Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AtTask (2nd nomination)
After the first debate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AtTask, it was decided that AtTask is a legitimate corporation per the  criterion. The sentences I added about AtTask's integration features have been removed. Also, with respect to notability, I've found a few more independent references that cover AtTask in-depth: http://www.cio.com/article/124309/How_to_Spot_a_Failing_Project, http://www.rev2.org/2007/09/14/task-enterprise-class-project-management/, http://www.softwareceo.com/attachments/attask/com091807.php, and http://www.techrockies.com/story/0009464.html. Furthermore, the references for Wikipedia articles for project management tools such as Vpmi, 24sevenoffice, and ProjectInsight seem even more secondary and trivial
— User:Vpdjuric, 00:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)