Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Anita's
you didn't look very hard either, more reviews and travel guides, none of which establish ote|notability as established in . You are missing the point regarding proper sourcing for restaurants- reviews, best of lists, directories, now open listings and all other outine coverage only provides that the place is erifiable. You need quality sources that are about the chain, not the poor quality listings that you have provided. You need articles that are about the chain, and when I say about the chain I mean articles that discuss its history in depth, it business model and other structures related to it. These other sources you keep adding aren't worth the paper they were printed on regarding notability. Remember that sources that are reliable do not automatically confer notability to a subject simply because said source is inherently reliable. You need quality, not quantity, and so far you have not provided the required quality sources
— User:Jerem43, 14:59, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:R||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)