Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CALA Homes
The sources provided by CNMall do establish notability as required by , The Telegraph's coverage http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/10/02/cala-homes-boss-hits-understaffed-councils-firm-soars-fifth/ and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/10/28/chinese-investor-eyes-up-high-end-house-builder-cala-homes-for-t/  is directly about the subject, and it satisfy  independent, reliable source. It is one of the oldest companies in the UK, in existence since 1875. (Almost 150 years). The Telegraph report also says it is the largest private house builder in the UK. Financial Times also covered it https://www.ft.com/content/7e1f2814-8fa3-11e2-9239-00144feabdc0/. But "delete! vote" is dismissing all these as a PR by wave of hand. Being covered by two reputable UK papers indeed shows a company is recognized and no PR strategy is able to manipulate these two papers to compromise their hard-earned reputation by advertising firm under cover of news coverage. Also wonder how The Scotsman's  http://www.scotsman.com/business/companies/cala-homes-could-boost-midlothian-to-tune-of-300m-1-4572548 report is vaguely termd as PR, perhaps because writing that is cheap
— User:Ammarpad, 01:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)