Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jory Prum
leaning weakest of all keeps) - This is a tough one. On one hand, there may be enough coverage to get by . On the other, what purpose does  serve (and it's quite clear wording) if it has no practical implications (i.e. )? {{ping|Jory}} {{tq|Audio engineering and dialogue production is an invisible art, which means that direct mention within news media is extremely rare.}} - Wikipedia is not here to right great wrongs or to provide a venue to celebrate those professions which go under-recognized elsewhere. In fact, one of the common criticisms of Wikipedia is that when it operates according to its own rules, as a tertiary source, it reinforces the status quo (i.e. covers things already well covered). I'd also add that nothing is more effective at pushing the experienced Wikipedian crowd towards delete like a horde of single-purpose accounts !voting keep. --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 00:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:COS||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Notability)