Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Womanity Foundation
As per Rentier's analysis.  I'm finding the same thing.  It should be noted that the Thomson Reuters article ''does not appear to be from their news service at all'', it appears to be a ''promotional'' post on their ''foundation's blog'' about an organization they've donated to  ''written by that organization's employees''.  It's an interesting example of a source that looks reliable on the surface, but completely fails  as non-independent when actually examined.  Ditto for the Forbes article, which was written by a "contributor" from "Ashoka" which listed http://womanity.org/partners/ as a partner of this organization.  This is a  violation that depends on unreliable sources for its content, if that content was removed there would be nothing left of the article
— User:Rrachet, 16:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PROMOTION (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)