Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units
probably all, although I haven't looked at any besides this one; if they're in the same format, they should be treated equally).  At best, this is a list of statistical data collected together into some nice tables.  Helpful information, sure, but  in the least bit encyclopedic.  At worst, one could argue this is a form of |adverstising, as the "article"'s  purpose is to list detailed specifications of products without any context.  Some above mention things like "it's an organizational list"--no, no it's not--if it were, it would list only the name of each item with links--instead, it's full specs.  Another mentions that Wikipedia is "a database for all people."  No, no it's not--it's an encyclopedia, not a database.  Our job is not to collect every fact in the world, and it never has been (insofar as policy and guidelines are concerned).  Others are concerned that converting this to prose will make comparisons more difficult--good, I say.  Again, we aren't here for people to look up details to do comparison shopping.   exists for a very good reason--because the project needs clear limitations on what counts as encyclopedic information and what does not.  That some find this useful is not enough; I'm sure there must be some that would find every possible piece of info (true or false) to be potentially useful
— User:Qwyrxian, 05:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:ADVERT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)