Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moderated nuclear explosion (2nd nomination)
WP:CSD G4: "Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion.") and trout the creator for not following normal procedures () and recreating his neologistic  against consensus. As determined in the original AfD, which I closed, there are no reliable sources discussing a moderated nuclear explosion. There are sources discussing nuclear events, which the article's author interprets as a "moderated nuclear explosion", but that is obviously original research. That he or she can now add a few new sources (not all what one would call RS for such a topic though) to his speculation doesn't change anything, as they present the exact same problem
— User:Fram, 09:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DRV||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)