Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krakatoa in media and popular culture
or '''merge''' to Krakatoa.  I just trimmed some trivial mentions (of the nature of "In work X, character Y says "this reminds me of Krakatoa!") and apparently non-notable examples, but some substantive cultural depictions remain.  Deletion simply is not an option per  because even if further trimmed down (by normal editing) to a mere few works, this information at a minimum belongs in the parent article.  Whether there is enough for a standalone split-off article is a matter for normal editing and discussion to resolve.  If there are enough notable works, then it also functions as an index of notable works by shared subject in addition to being a subtopic of Krakatoa.  The claims that this is  are difficult to understand, because this does not combine material from different sources to make a conclusion or statement of fact that those sources do not support.  And for the claim that this is garden-variety , it seems that this claim was made on the incorrect belief that mere reliance on a primary source constitutes OR.  Whether a work is about, or substantively depicts Krakatoa is verifiable, even if from the work itself.  Listing such works together does not inherently constitute SYNTH even if you are the first to do so, no more than it is to be the first to combine information from two particular biographies about a "George Washington" without having a third book telling you that the biographies are indeed about the same man
— User:Postdlf, 18:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)