Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physical comparison of tigers and lions (2nd nomination)
As for the nominator's comment about why this can't be covered in other articles like lion and tiger, he has opposed having what he would call "too much", "trivial" or "unimportant" information in pages like those, even if it's covered in Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|WP:reliable sources and is directly related to the subject, such as in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lion&diff=848131765&oldid=848126069 this case, which led to the necessity of articles like this being kept separate from those pages, and as I have made it clear already, this is not , but a subject that has been '''directly''' covered in '''detail''', in a '''number''' of reliable sources, for example
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)