Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagined interaction
The topic is probably notable, but significant portions of the article are incomprehensible.  This is one of the clearer cases where an article should be |blown up and started over.  The collapsed argument by the |SPA and the article have more or less the same quality.  This does not mean that the SPA is a |suckpoppet, but it may mean that the topic attracts this sort of rhetoric
— User:Robert, 19:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:SPA||WP:SOCK (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)