Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual personal names (5th nomination)
We do not publish the real name of the infamous Star Wars Kid, citing '''''' and "|do no harm".  Why then is it we are maintaining a list of '''''children''''' much younger than Star Wars Kid (at the time the meme began) who are named something they have no control over?  Is a person really notable if some local newspaper happens to mention someone was given an "unusual" name by their parents on a slow news day?  I'm reading comments like "The loss it pretty obvious" and "article has an excessive number of independent reliable sources" and cannot help but strongly disagree with that line of thinking.  I don't see how this article benefits Wikipedia editors, passive readers, or the living subjects being covered
— User:JBsupreme, 08:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:DONOHARM (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)