Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patti Sacks
But to be fair, she is not entirely unsourcable... and in 1939, 1940, and 1944, only the bigger names received an onscreen credit. Heck, the further back one looks in film history of onscreen credits, the less likely that any but the top three actors received any onscreen notice by the studios. THAT in itself would not form my opinion. There was a flurry of news blurbs in 1948 and 1952 making reference to her divorce from Jane Wyman#Fred Karger|Fred Karger,http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Patti+Sacks%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%22Patti+Sacks%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&tbs=ar:1,sbd:1&tbm=nws&prmd=imvnso&ei=mPlXUMGRF4H7igLU7YDIBw&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=2d946c6b2c35186c&biw=1024&bih=600 an early husband of Jane Wyman,http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=1_ciAAAAIBAJ&sjid=680FAAAAIBAJ&pg=5164,382518&dq=patti-sacks&hl=en but nothing much about her work as an actress. Looks like Patti finally become an attorney as she had planned,http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Patti+Karger%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1http://books.google.com/books?id=pY9JAQAAIAAJ&q=%22Patti+Sacks+Karger%22&dq=%22Patti+Sacks+Karger%22&source=bl&ots=DyKvvXjXZQ&sig=ImVA_cYp8RJzl-Rq-CHWVmowHgM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=h_xXUJ-DKYLQiwKl2YGYBg&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA but she does not have enough coverage to meet 
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 04:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)