Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenia Kotval
The induction as a Fellow by the American Institute of Certified Planners a part of the American Planning Association should satisfy criteria 2 of  as it would be on the scale of the Association of Computing Machinery or other Professional Fellowship recognition. Just be cause an academic profession intersects with applied work it does not make it less notable. Additionally across disciplines what constitutes a contribution to the field vary thus the 100+ books in the planning field probably is in higher regard than peer reviewed publications. Thus Criteria 1 is partially met as well and with a little more investigation and probably expertise in the subject could be a better judge how criteria 1 is met. I disagree with the position that content should be deleted rather than made a draft or kept as a stub for future improvement. I speak from my personal experience that I'd rather take a single line article the expand upon that has one or two sources than have to start by establishing the same facts to start. It is like growing sugar crystals, a slight imperfection allows the greater structure to grow
— User:Wolfgang8741, 14:08, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)