Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Gettleson
It's a rambling mess of an article. I think there's a nugget of why he might be notable in there with the whole Cambridge Analytica thing, but a BEFORE search doesn't show enough reliable sources for me to assume a keep off of that, and as noted above he's such a minor player he doesn't get mentioned in other sources. A keep vote would require massive amounts  to narrowly focus why he's notable. Also fails , for what it's worth
— User:SportingFlyer, 02:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)