Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Slatter
see later comments) - No reliable secondary sources are provided in the article - they are all self published or blogs. One is even a deadlink to a facebook page. Punkrocker, thanks for providing the sources above, but I do not believe these qualify as reliable sources. They simply appear to be blogs without editorial oversight. At least one of them is signed "Punkrocker1991". Producing expert opinions in itself is not going to help, unless said opinion has been reported in a |reliable source. Publishers Weekly might get close, but I don't know if they are notable, and more to the point, I can't verify their review exists. Other acceptable "evidence" would be a review in a major magazine or newspaper, or some other demonstration that the work is of major importance. It fails both  and  at the moment, and a quick google search doesn't produce anything better than that mentioned above
— User:Yeti, 03:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)