Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Boeing 747 gambit
and also look carefully at articles such as Russell's teapot, Last Thursdayism, etc.  There seems to be an increasing perception that if twenty different analogies/rhetorical figures have been used to try and make a particular point, each of those analogies should be given its own article, rather than mentioning those analogies or a reasonable subset thereof in an article which is about the point they drive to(and of course, in NPOV fashion, about the counter-point to that point.)  Even if the analogy of the "Ultimate Boeing 747" ''was'' notable enough to merit its own individual article, this article would still be bad, as pretty much everything except the direct quotes is |original research
— User:Antaeus, 21:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)