Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz Prince
Tomboy'' is notable by the reviews Grayfell posts (not convinced by Masters Review but the others seem professional or semi-professional). There's also a Publishers Weekly reviewhttp://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-936976-55-3, a staff review in PunkNewshttp://www.punknews.org/review/12938/liz-prince-tomboy-book which is reliable for music reviews so presumably ok for comicshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Sources, a not-online review in Booklisthttp://www.booklistonline.com/ProductInfo.aspx?pid=6929086&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 (an American Libraries Aassociation publication), and a review (and non-notable award) by Kirkushttps://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/liz-prince/tomboy/. Writing a widely-reviewed book makes you a notable |author
— User:Colapeninsula, 10:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)