Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting of Danny Gonen
As per  the most important of the several policies that distinguish notable events from routine news and events.   reads: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article."  I point you to in-depth articles on this terror murder in the New York Times, The Daily Telegraph, Haaretz, and elsewhere.  I remind editors raising  that WP is  and , and that  is not a policy based argument.   An event with this breadth and depth of coverage does not have to demonstrate ongoing impact to be WP notable. Under  an event has to meet , which this event objectively does. Nevertheless, this shooting has had demonstrable impact (in article since the creation) on the Israeli conversation about whether to agree to a prisoner exchange that Hamas is requesting this summer (for the bodies of soldiers, or for the return of a mentally ill Israelis who crossed the border into Gaza).  It is argued that since this was one of 6 recent terror murders carried out by convicted terrorists released in the Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange, a fresh exchange endangers the lives of Israelis and is, therefore, bad policy
— User:E, 19:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:BATTLEGROUND||WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT||WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:INDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)