Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Van Leer (2nd nomination)
fails  and no new evidence presented or any real claim that he meets it. "Related to noteworthy people" is not a criterion, and no evidence that Cosmo has written about him has been presented. Perhaps he appears as a model in Cosmo ads? That is not notability. Additionally, the recreation of deleted content and the blatant |conflict of interest-gaming count against any leniency
— User:Dhartung, 04:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)