Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson's Underworld
While the article looks packed with sources, actually looking at them show that many are not reliable, secondary sources, and the majority are just from the same handful of extremely local news sources.  The arguments above that it is notable because a notable person has visited does not establish notability per , and the argument that there are articles on similar attractions is invalid per .  Searching for additional sources just turns up the same kind of routine coverage in very local sources, and nothing that would indicate that it has any notability outside of the community it is in
— User:Rorshacma, 17:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)