Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarbonInsights.org
It's possible that the magazine will become notable (which means: be written about by independent, reliable sources) in the future. But rystal|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.  The magazine has no notability at this point (which means, it has not been recognized by independent reliable sources), so the article does not belong on Wikipedia. Romeo423 has gone to a lot of trouble to develop this page, so it should be userfied back to his userpage rather than deleted. That way it can be reposted, AFTER independent reliable sources report on the magazine and confirm its notability. However, please carefully read  and  before reposting it, because the Wikipedia community takes a very dim view of reposting deleted articles if the problems haven't been fixed. (By the way, Gia 72, you kept trying to add the facebook page to the article, but facebook is a perfect example of something that is NOT a "reliable source" in the Wikipedia sense. Likewise twitter
— User:MelanieN, 14:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:C||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Copyrights)