Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vageshwari Deswal
I think there's a case here for the subject as a public intellectual per  C7.  It's very much verging on , but the consistent record of blogging for the India Times organization (note that the Economic Times and Times of India appear to be co-owned, and certainly have a common blog platform) is something.  The subject also appears to be frequently and somewhat substantially quoted on matters surrounding her legal expertise in India.  The combination brings me to a (very) weak keep.  The case would be more solid if there were more evidence of impact for the blog; I do note that it seems harder to find such evidence for a blog for the Economic/Times/ of India than in a comparable US-based publication.  I agree with concerns of {{u| Aseleste}} about ing, but as usual, 
— User:Russ, 20:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPROF||WP:TOOSOON||WP:REFBOMB||WP:DINC (Wikipedia:Notability)