Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega (1987 computer game)
for reasons I've articulated above (at length, ad nauseum) in response to the only developed opinion in favor of retention, by Pixelface. I'm unmoved by the remaining arguments along those lines, as three (Xihr, clpo13, 23skidoo) appear willing to rest on the strength of Pixelface's position alone, and the fourth (wwwwolf) is admittedly half-hearted and contingent on a possibility with no demonstrable likelihood of coming to pass. Longevity is not notability, nor do I see signs of reliable sources that contribute significant material toward recognition of the subject's notability. Obscure or not, ''Omega'' fails to meet Wikipedia standards and practices for inclusion on those grounds. ''I'm willing to be convinced otherwise'', but to date I simply cannot agree that any of the resources linked-to above constitute adequate evidence per , , or 
— User:D, 11:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Verifiability)