Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassie Jaye
Everyone who is talking about WP:ACTOR, WP:DIRECTOR, etc are missing the point here. The criteria for biographical articles comes down to the same criteria as all other articles, from : {{tq|People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject}}. As part of the AfD discussion template, there are links to sources like Google News and Google Scholar and Google Books. Taking a look at this results https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Cassie+Jaye%22&tbm=nws News - 1550, https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Cassie+Jaye%22 Books: 600+ (although I'm sure many of these are false positives you can see pretty clearly from the previews that she's discussed in multiple books, https://cse.google.com/cse?hl=en&cx=007734830908295939403:galkqgoksq0&cof=FORID:13%3BAH:left%3BCX:Wikipedia%2520Reference%2520Search&q=%22Cassie+Jaye%22#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22Cassie%20Jaye%22&gsc.page=1 Custom Search 15,000+... It's true that this article isn't currently making adequate use of the  that covers her, and that's problem. But in terms of the  there's no question
— User:Scarpy, 20:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:RS||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)