Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precision Manuals Development Group (3rd nomination)
Two sources -- http://blogs.wsj.com/corporate-intelligence/2013/08/30/almost-as-cool-as-the-new-boeing-777-the-new-flight-simulator/ and http://www.salon.com/2003/07/23/flightsim_terrorism/, both not having the company as the focus. The coverage in the first one is good to supplement GNG and second provides a mention. I can't find any extra coverage. And I don't see how this yet passes / with multiple reliable independent ''in-depth'' sources. Most of the reliable sources review their games including awards http://www.precisionmanuals.com/pages/reviews.html, but notability is . Last AfD had basically 1 participant and first AfD mostly presented sources for products' reviews rather than for the company itself. (While I personally feel many companies should have additional notability criteria if their products are highly reviewed/acclaimed, this is currently not in any guidelines.) —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 11:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Notability)