Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Rose (podcaster)
Reviewing the citations in the article, we have one long, in depth piece about Rose https://www.vice.com/en/article/bv8x5a/london-real-brian-rose-digital-freedom-coronavirus; a short puff piece about Rose https://www.livingvegan.com/london-reals-brian-rose-shares-his-recipe-for-a-filling-vegan-breakfast-smoothie/, but is it RS?; and three short pieces about Rose https://www.cityam.com/london-mayoral-election-campaigns-kick-off-despite-lockdown/ https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-55796176 https://www.indy100.com/news/brian-rose-london-mayor-campaign-fine-b1792391 on his mayoral campaign. The Salon and Press Gazette pieces are not primarily about Rose, but do contain significant coverage of Rose. The Telegraph, CNBC and News-24.fr pieces contain significant coverage of his channel London Real and mention Rose. The ITV piece has significant coverage of London Real but does not mention Rose. Politifact, swlondoner, El Confidencial, Deadline and McGill all just mention Rose. The other BBC News piece mentions Rose's Icke interview, but does not mention Rose by name. Vice + Salon + Press Gazette + first BBC News piece + Indy100 seems plenty to satisfy . The mayoral candidacy on its own would fail . Some of the coverage focuses more on London Real, so I did wonder if it was better to have an article on that than on Rose. But I think, combined, it makes sense to have a Rose article on his actions (Vice), London Real stuff (including the Icke interview - Press Gazette/Salon/Telegraph/CNBC/News-24.fr) and his candidacy (second BBC News piece/Indy100/City AM
— User:Bondegezou, 19:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:Notability)