Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Arlman
unless somebody can improve the article. Mayors are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they existed — and that goes especially for mayors of small municipalities in the 10-20K population range. The notability test for mayors is not just the ability to say that he was a mayor, it is the ability to write and |reliably source some genuine ''substance'' about the ''significance'' of his mayoralty: specific things he did, specific effects he had on the development of the town or city, and on and so forth. But there's no such content here at all: it just says he served as a mayor and then moves on without saying or sourcing ''anything'' that might establish how he could be seen as a ''notable'' mayor. And if there are "many secondary sources about him", none of them are actually ''in the article'' — so getting him over the bar is not just a question of ''saying'' that unspecified sources exist, it's a question of ''showing'' that enough sources exist to get him over : namely, by ''finding'' those sources and ''using'' them to ''expand the article
— User:Bearcat, 14:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)