Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pincus v. Yahoo! Inc.
can those proposing a redirect explain the value they perceive in redirecting to an article that does not discuss the subject?  edirects are cheap, of course, but if the redirect has no value (indeed a negative value, in that it misleadingly suggests to a reader that the target has something to do with what they searched for or clicked on), it's not a matter of whether it's cheap, it's whether it's helpful or the opposite
— User:TJRC, 01:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:R (Wikipedia:Redirect)