Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stylianos Vlasopoulos
We are still trying to find out the notability of this individual and so far we have scant evidence by a few primary sources that he may have written a book and in another that his signature appears on the constitution of the Septinsular republic and that he is referred to as rector. These primary sources are interpreted by us to be important, which is original research, yet there is no secondary or tertiary source attesting to any significance of the scant evidence which exists. Every other claim made in the article about Ali Pasa and saving the Greeks of Kefalonia etc. is sompletely unverified. How are we going to write an article on the person then? Are we going to say that "his signature appeared on the constitution of the Septinsular republic" without an independent scholar having said that? And "He is referred to as rector in some book"? Are we going to be based on |personal evidence to interpret literally one-word primary document evidence to write an article? Is this our function on Wikipedia? To read one-word entries in some old list attached to some name, (not even supported by a complete sentence), and then write articles about the name appearing on the list? This is a classic example of  and . And even if we do this SYNTH what then? Everything else mentioned in the article will have to go. What we are going to end up with is just a few / supported sentences and a one-sentence stub of an article. Not a pretty sight
— User:Dr, 14:42, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)