Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Lataster (3nd nomination)
Per nom and clearly Fails  and also fails  .The subject is an  Australian academic even if he represents   scholarship simply lacks independent coverage .Per Lankiveil above could find only one independent article about the subject.Other sources are obsure and the fact that the subject or  everyone who writes one article in the Washington Post does not make the subject notable  or one mention  https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Q1zlCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT78&dq=%22Raphael+Lataster%22&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Raphael%20Lataster%22&f=false in a book does not make him pass 
— User:Pharaoh, 07:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)