Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Boerebach
After the references that Nuujinn has added, the article clearly passes the , i.e. has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. What more do you want? Also half the nom appears to be about the wording. If you think the wording is bad or a section is not relevant, remove or refactor it, don't just send the whole article to AfD
— User:Jenks24, 07:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)