Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Banggs
Number of films in a genre ''can'' contribute to a porn star's prolificness, and certainly more so than the Google test, which on its own is unquestionably invalid, but it does speak to both the size of an entertainer's fanbase/following (see ) and the prolificness of their work and can be used ''in conjunction with'' more valid criteria of either  or  to make a determination of whether they have a significant following and/or are prolific in any genre. This actress doesn't even seem to be prolific in porn ''in general'', or anything else for that matter, as Googling her gets under 400 hits. I get more relevant hits if I Google ''my'' name (real name, not WP name), and I'm not notable enough for a WP article. I can't find anything about this actress other than her IMDB (and similar) profiles and some minor mentions/inclusions on spammish porn sites. She doesn't even have a website of her own. While even that is not an immediate grounds for inclusion/exclusion, again, it is a piece of evidence that needs to be looked at as a part of a whole. All of the sources in this article are IMDB (or similar) and  while such sites may be used as sources ''in conjunction with'' other |reliable sources, including the actress' own website, if she has one, as this is an article about a person and would be considered a primary source provided the information is neutral, and preferably at least one third-party reliable source, IMDB-ish sites ''alone'' are not acceptable as reliable sources
— User:LaMenta3, 18:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:PORNBIO||WP:BIO||WP:ATT (Wikipedia:Notability)