Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming_(3rd_nomination)|Even ten years ago it was clear to me and others that this article had become a |badly written nexus of non-notable fringe theories and advocacy for religious points of view. Ten years on, a dozen scientists formerly denying climate change have died. Outside of another dozen die-hards in the United States, virtually no credentialed scientist does not think that climate change is man-made and will, on the whole, have deleterious effects on us and our world. As a scientific community, we also have much more information and data, and the consensus has gotten stronger (close to 99.9 % of scientists agree) as the Max_Planck#Quantum_mechanics|obituary pages continue to publish the memorials to those who disagree with scientific consensus. Everyone has moved on with their lives. In the meanwhile, I've earned a master's of art in teaching secondary science. I still find students who don't believe in evolution, and in some quarters, natural selection remains controversial, but ''absolutely nobody'' -- not teachers, not students, not scholars -- ''seriously'' denies climate change any more. A list that purports to list the dozen or so people who still deny it to their grave is shrinking each day, and is an example of FUD|fraudulently spreading doubt and uncertainty, as noted by {{U|Johnuniq}}. At some time in the past ten years, climate change denial-ism has become the next alchemy, Luminiferous aether|ether, and astronomy. Sure there are a handful of believers in this, Area 51, cold fusion, Occultism in Nazism, AIDS denialism, and the Age of Aquarius, but it's so few that to list them in an article is to give |extreme undue weight to that side. The list also is written as a Gish gallop - a whole series of illogical arguments with their own adherents designed to obfuscate the lack of evidence of the other side
— User:Bearian, 18:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)