Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Greenwalt
Mm, I'm with EEng.  The article claims that the subject has been "featured" in the ''San Francisco Examiner,'' but when you pull up the cite, it's a 168 word soundbite from one of the Examiner's bloggers, half of which is the subject boasting about her skills at gaming the Google search engine.  The article's lead claim that the subject "has been a major influence on the recent 21st century turn towards more feminine styles and colors used in digital and print design" comes from her own response on a blog interview.  She has allegedly been featured in "Design 360º," a publication which lacks a Wikipedia article, and indeed a search turns up, why, Greenwalt's Wikipedia article as the lead hit.  The article also claims that she was named a "top designer of 2009" by Print Runner, but the company's website seems to have no record of the same. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jessica+Greenwalt%22+site%3Aprintrunner.com&hl=en&biw=1067&bih=699&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=off&tbs=The bar of  is quite high, and alleged awards from spurious sources doesn't come remotely close.  The subject certainly doesn't meet the GNG
— User:Ravenswing, 16:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE (Wikipedia:Notability)