Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERROL
This article gives  coverage of one specific entity-relationship language. What would be more appropriate would be a Wikipedia article on such languages more generally, giving appropriate coverage to the http://scholar.google.co.il/scholar?hl=en&q=%22entity+relationship%22+intitle%3Alanguage&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 several other ones that are more notable than ERROL. As for the 29 hits in an early comment from ERfan (whose name does not exactly convey an image of neutrality): most of them appear to be primarily about other e-r languages and tools and only cite ERROL as part of their competition, rather than having nontrivial coverage of ERROL specifically. For instance, the first one, "A graphical data manipulation language", does not even mention ERROL in the main text of the paper, only includes a reference to it at the end in a collection of "nongraphical ER languages". The second one, on SQL/EER, only has one sentence citing ERROL and four other languages. The third one (skipping the ones by the ERROL authors themselves) is the one on QBD*, again includes it in passing as one of five citations for the phrase "fourth generation languages". So I'm also not convinced that there's really adequate depth of third-party coverage
— User:David, 23:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)