Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tas László Dobos
per , with no prejudice against recreating with better sourcing.  The most plausible case for notability is through , which would generally require multiple reviews of multiple works.  The article does appear to have some quotations from reviews, but sourcing is extremely unclear, and it is unclear how one would go about verifying.  I suspect that the subject had reviewed works in the pre-internet age, with the reviews appearing perhaps in defunct Hungarian newspapers (for example).  The reviews quotations that are in the article do not look like a clear pass of  even if they could be tracked down; meanwhile, the article is in a sufficiently poor state that I believe we'd be better off starting from scratch if reviews are tracked down later.  I am not particularly influenced by the hu wiki deletion discussion, as notability criteria are surely quite different; I remind participants here that sources do not need to be in English or online (but they do need to be |verifiable).  I will remark that I do speak some Hungarian, though I am far from fluent
— User:Russ, 08:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:V (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)