Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pwn (2nd nomination)
open to Merge or Move to Wiktionary, but not open to Delete.  Nominator argued "not sourced" but in order to argue deletion, you need to demonstrate "not sourceable".  http://news.cnet.com/2300-7349_3-6220529-2.html, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1659741,00.html?iid=digg_share show that it's certainly |verifiable.  I think a discussion of possibly moving to wiktionary could be fruitful (not sure how I feel about that) but I would not support deleting the material.  Another possibility would be to merge into some page about related slang terms, with the content on "PWN" as a section
— User:Cazort, 19:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)