Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ursula Reinstein
Sorry to pester. I don't have a vested interest in the outcome of this discussion either way, but I'd like to point out that I believe keeping this article on the grounds of  would be an unusually broad application of that guideline. The guideline is most commonly used to justify keeping or creating articles on professors whose work is highly cited (as a proxy for highly impactful). While Ursula Reinstein is an author on several papers, that work is not highly cited. Also she was not an independent researcher at the time, but was either a graduate student in Martin Reifinger's lab, or a Postdoctoral researcher in Brett Finlay's lab. To consider someone notable under  entirely for work done under the supervision of other scientists would be highly unusual. Or at least it's not something I've seen before. If we consider this level of academic impact to meet |the first NPROF criterion, then we should consider clarifying this at  as nearly all professors at research universities and many postdocs will have a similar number/impact of publications. Also, having your work featured on the cover of a journal does not necessarily indicate unusually high impact (which is why we use citations as a proxy for impact instead). Last thing, {{ping|AuthorAuthor}} you mention meeting ; I couldn't find any independent sources that substantially cover Ursula Reinstein. I may have missed some that cover her maiden name? Could you elaborate on why you feel she meets GNG? Thanks. Sorry for the long message
— User:Ajpolino, 22:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NPROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)