Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudomathematics (2nd nomination)
This appears to be our main article on mathematical crankery, frequent mistakes, and the like, a notable topic (the subject of whole books, e.g. Dudley's ''Mathematical Cranks'', Barbeau's ''Mathematical Fallacies, Flaws, and Flimflam'' and ''More Fallacies, Flaws & Flimflam'', or de Morgan's ''A Budget of Paradoxes''). Probably a better name can be found for it, but that is not a good reason for deletion. For the same reason the nominator's argument that "to have any credibility the material you cite ought to use the term" itself lacks credibility — per , our articles are about notable topics, not about English words, so it is the topic, not the word, that needs sources
— User:David, 07:04, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDICT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)