Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rex Armistead
An article that unlike this one had no sources and was intended to defame its subject would be subject to deletion under #G10 as an attack page. But that's not the same as a well-sourced and well-balanced article, as this one appears to be, that says primarily negative things about its subject. To take an extreme case, we don't delete our article on Ted Bundy for being too negative. So, while Vernon's nomination rationale could be valid in different circumstances, I'm not convinced that it applies in this case unless Vernon or other proponents of deletion can come up with substantial positive coverage which was inappropriately omitted from the article. And even if such material turns up, I agree with Esradekan that it would more likely be a cause to rewrite than to delete
— User:David, 05:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)