Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methodist churches in Leicester
I would '''conditionally support''' the ''merge'' supported by {{ping|Ross-c|Hut 8.5}}, ''but'' this article cannot wait for that merge to be carried out and, given the controversial nature of this article, |consensus to merge with the target should be '''discussed at the talk page of the ''proposed'' target article'''. It's ''not'' our place to deliver edicts to merge said content into a target. Thus, I think a merger is ultimately appropriate ''down the road'', but that the correct outcome as an |alternative to deletion is to '''draftify''' this list which fails the above-noted policies for lists and lists, categories, and navigation templates. It's non-qualifying encyclopedic content and cannot remain in the '''Main:''' namespace. While it's being draftified, incubated, and so forth, a parallel discussion can emerge on the talk page of the proposed target. But, at present, |consensus is now firmly ''against'' "keep"-ing this article, and since "merge" is a variant on "keep," we really do only have two (three, actually) possible outcomes:  delete, draftify, or userify. Userify isn't likely a good option as there's a number of willing editors to contribute
— User:Dmehus, 20:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CON||WP:ATD||WP:CON (Wikipedia:Consensus)