Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts
WP:SNOW.  Legal disputes are plainly an encyclopedic subject.  The sourcing for ths one clearly establishes the formal baseline criteria notability.  #NEWS is about trivial news of the day.   is, likely, something to keep us from covering trivial issues simply because they affect Wikipedia.  This is a significant issue involving two of the more prominent players on opposite sides of the issue - WIkipedia and the NPG.  It is pretty important to people interested in artwork and copyright.  Nevertheless, after a small spate of significant coverage the matter grew quiet as a news item, and has received relatively little attention in the days that followed, which may in fact suggest it is just the news of the day.  If the dispute gains ongoing coverage that would argue for keeping - an actual lawsuit would probably get a lot of coverage; if it diminishes into obscurity via uneventful resolution or lack of coverage I might change it to a weak delete.  I don't see much fuss either way.So what's the fuss
— User:Wikidemon, 23:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NAVEL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)