Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Harner
based on the above. Google search suggests he's clearly well-known in his field, and apparently well-cited. I will note however that there seems to be much criticism of his work on the web which is not reflected in the article at all, suggesting a  and/or  issue. We should rectify this, but it's not criteria for deletion
— User:Ivanvector, 00:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SELFSOURCE||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)