Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose (goat)
I'll admit that my first reaction was: "A goat!? What the hell?" However, after overcoming my gut Speciesism|speciesist response and actually looking at the article ... yes, this goat is notable. That a goat is more notable than myself is perhaps a somewhat depressing thought, but it doesn't change the facts of the matter. I don't think refocusing the article to be about the goatsex is necessarily a good idea (as it complicates matters with regard to ), but it's worth considering. However, I see no merit in the arguments for deletion. "It's a goat, for Pete's sake" is a good first reaction, but an inadequate deletion rationale
— User:Black, 18:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)