Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOPYX Social LMS
the "sources" list is full of self-published material, mirror sites (of self-published material), broken links and non-RS blogs. If you remove everything that doesn't constitute either "independent" or "reliable", the subject would seem to fail  by a good distance. Fairly obvious promo-spam from what I can see. Article was declined 3 times at AFC for being promo but was created anyway
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]], 05:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)