Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pankaj Rag
Subject meets |Wikipedia's general notability guideline given the significant coverage they have received in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources such as, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/business-of-bollywood/pankaj-rag-the-perfect-relacement-for-tripurari-sharan/articleshow/2846557.cms Economic Times, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/FTII-begins-selection-process/articleshow/5268109.cms Times of India 1, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Layout/Includes/ETNEW/ArtWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=ETNEW&BaseHref=ETM/2010/07/24&GZ=T&ViewMode=HTML&EntityId=Ar01800&AppName=1 Times of India 2, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-bookreview/inner-history-of-the-uprising/article671418.ece The Hindu, http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?266768 Outlook India, http://www.newindianexpress.com/magazine/article476137.ece?service=print Indian Express, etc. Subject may also meet the  criteria #3, for they have written a book that was subject to multiple independent reviews (http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-bookreview/inner-history-of-the-uprising/article671418.ece, http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?266768, http://www.newindianexpress.com/magazine/article476137.ece?service=print). We may at least write a stub using these sources. There are many other passing mentions of the subject, may be found on clicking this http://searchindiannews.in/#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=Pankaj%20rag&gsc.sort=&gsc.page=1 link
— User:Anupmehra, 14:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)