Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jothydev Kesavadev
per  at the least.  I don't see a pass of  C1 here -- possibly .  I'm uncertain about the case for C3, but since the RCP fellowship is not supported by a reliable source (and I didn't succeed in finding one), I don't think this forms a good keep argument for the article.  Meanwhile, there is little from the current text of the article that would go into an eventual article on the subject.  I certainly don't think that we should take a no-consensus close on |another article (with particularly tart comments from the closing admin about poor keep arguments) as forming any kind of precedent
— User:Russ, 16:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:NPROF||WP:TOOSOON||WP:WHATABOUTX (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)