Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olive Tree Theology
I also do not like "endorsed".  Romans 9-11 is liable to be ignored by gentile christians, becuase it has litlte relevance to them.  It is however part of the scriptures.  A commentary on it is thus potentially encyclopaedic.  The question is whether this is merely one man's opinion (hence a NN logism, or whether it represents the views of a wide range of Messianic Jews.  If it does, it should be kept, but with some cleaning up.  However, I am not qualified to judge
— User:Peterkingiron, 16:52, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)