Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Picault
Some edits on Wikipedia are responded to more quickly than others.  I believe this is not generally due to prejudice, but because it can take time for an editor to notice an edit that needs to be addressed.  I happened to check the article in question soon after you had made the edit I proceeded to reverse.  The fact that I reverted your change, 78.145.35.67, within "seconds", was a coincidence as a result.  You may not believe me, but it is the truth.  The source cited in Goux's article is reliable, imo, but I believe its coverage of him is trivial.  According to otability (people), "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability".  What I have quoted is a guideline, but I believe trivial coverage in one reliable source is not enough to establish notability for Goux.  78.145.35.67, you said "One of the other articles has the same level of citation".  Please could you tell me which article that is?  I ask because I would like to investigate it, to see if it deserves to be on Wikipedia.  You also said "or just because you don't know about it. That's because you know nothing about this article."  I do not see how my knowledge of the article on Goux has anything to do with my knowledge of another article
— User:JEdgarFreeman, 20:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)