Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerhard Kramm
The h-index is promising but not quite enough to convince me of a pass of #C1 (searching Google scholar for ozone formation or ozone destruction reveals many better-cited papers on the subject than his top paper), and in any case is not enough by itself to write an article. And despite what seems to have been a lot of effort over the course of the article, the sources are still weak and non-neutral, mostly coming either from Kramm himself or from the Cato Institute
— User:David, 19:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)