Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Inconsistent Truth
I was not canvassed to be here, but found this on the delsort. While the article |needs work, and should not rely on questionable sources, we do have enough offered above to show the film as meeting the |requisites of otability (film). I note that a few of the above delete votes appear to have been based upon sources contained in the article at the time of their votes and not upon what is findable through searches. RVE|That's not how we determine a topic's notability. I have not seen the film and have no opinion one way or the other on its subject matter... but |we do not sit in judgement over the truth or not of a topic. We instead determine through |policy and F|guideline if it has, even in ignoring questionable sources, received enough coverage in enough reliable sources to be determinable as notable.  This one has. And with respects to the nominator, those |"attributes" you shared, are '''not''' requirements of , but are criteria that ''if'' present encourage more diligent searches for sources.  As sources already exist, we need not even consider whether or not we need consider them
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 23:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CLEANUP||WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:NRVE||WP:V||WP:V||WP:NF||WP:OEN||WP:MOVIE (Wikipedia:Cleanup)