Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derbyshire and Lancashire Gliding Club
both per Nimbus' comments and my own belief that the umpteen thousand various definitions of notability are becoming more and more of a club with which to beat worthy articles, often simply because people |don't like them. Wikipedia is |not paper, therefore I fail to comprehend why so many things which are |verifiable are smacked with a "not |notable" argument. Is Wikipedia running out of space? I doubt it. So why ''not'' cover subjects like these, as long as they can be verified using secondary sources and have some claim to notability in any for beyond |existing? AfD should be a case where the onus should be on those seeking deletion to prove why an article should ''not'' be in Wikipedia, not on those seeking to keep it to prove why it ''should''. It seems to be the latter way, though, and that saddens me. /Rambling
— User:The, 22:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:V||WP:N||WP:ITEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)