Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Bitner
This is a really tough one. There's an obvious (and I think valid) argument to be made that the subject is |notable (given the assertion that she had ''"38 film roles and 87 television credits"'') but not necessarily notable in a manner that can be |verified. I don't think its an imaginative stretch to suggest that a white actor with similar credits might have received more "significant coverage" in mainstream media. Many of the most high-profile African-American "celebrities" (in all fields) of the 40s and 50s received far less "coverage" than their white co-stars / colleagues. Unfortunately for the subject in question, gradually increasing press coverage of African-Americans through the 70s, 80s and 90s coincided with the end of her career and her retirement. Retrospective coverage of the career of a non-headlining actress is unlikely, regardless of the extent to which might balance out historically skewed reporting. Every argument I can give for keeping it would be resoundingly  in nature and I won't insult your intelligence by trying. But I would ask that any closing admin give consideration to whether or not a ''strong and obvious'' |consensus has been reached, in making their determination. Thanks all
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]] ., 03:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:CONSENSUS (Wikipedia:Notability)