Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenPsion
I am, actually, a bit confused by the arguments given above. By common consensus, Wikipedia is not meant to describe everything that is |interesting or |useful. It is meant to cover everything that is |notable. The |notability criteria specify what "notability" means in this context: There must be Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent sources which cover the topic. That might be press coverage (press, not blogs), or books describing this software in detail, or similar. Unless such sources are provided, the topic just fails the criteria. Don't take this as a personal attack: That's the way we deal with all topics here. Currently, I don't see that OpenPsion is notable; maybe it will be one day, and then it deserves an article. By the way, Bdushaw, your comments above suggest that you are one of the authors of the software. In this case, you may have a |conflict of interest, and should be very careful about editing the article
— User:B, 13:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INTERESTING||WP:USEFUL||WP:N||WP:N||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)