Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with the longest marriages (2nd nomination)
Smells like . This is trivia, pure and simple. Creating list pages when there isn't a related article should not be done lightly. Someone commented that the lack of maintainability isn't an valid argument but a list with a volatile membership requiring disproportionate effort to keep up to date is cruft. That there is no related article reinforces the non-encyclopedic nature of the list
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LISTCRUFT (Wikipedia:Listcruft)