Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agitainment
I copyedited a bit per  and . However, I tend toward delete per nom, unless editors can proof that this new word has been been described in a |reliable source. Not as a trivial neologism buzz word in an entertainment media
— User:Dekisugi, 10:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MOS||WP:EL||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)