Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Beale (5th nomination)
based on what everyone else has said already: to summarise: fails , fails , fails , possibly other guidelines or policies, apart from being vanity and puffery. I cannot believe that the subject of the article gave a ''keep'' vote, and questioning almost every other ''delete'' vote! I thought such behaviour was a breach of ? It should be noted that many of the ''keep'' votes are from new accounts or IP addresses - looking at the contributions, they are people who have done little or no Wikipedia editing - is the subject drumming up support for keeping this article
— User:Rapido, 20:02, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR||WP:RS||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)