Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Bridson
per nom. As the nominator did, I went seeking sources which might support  and . In honesty, and with every respect, while the subject's contributions to the relevant spheres (as editor, activist, politician, etc) may be documented in other/offline sources, I can find no evidence of that. Not to the extent that the subject is a primary topic of published (paper/offline) works at any rate. In the online sphere, the only sources I can find are https://www.celticleague.net/news/carn-editor-steps-down-after-29-years/ this article and https://www.celticleague.net/news/mann-is-mysogyny-alive-and-well/ this one. Both of which seem to be published by the group/publication with which the subject was associated (ie. primary sources). And, while both of these support the claims in the article stub (subject was an editor and activist), they do not address the GNG/SIGCOV question. As the subject is not the primary topic in either piece of coverage. In short: delete. On GNG/SIGCOV grounds
— User:Guliolopez, 20:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NBIO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)