Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asticlian Gambit
as reception in two secondary source has been discovered, the miniumum suggested by . As far as I can see, several deletion votes have not said why these secondary sources should not be preserved. That said, I would obviously prefer a merge over deletion. At least the reception section would be there to preserve
— User:Daranios, 14:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)