Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Palace (chat site)
I originally created the article as part of my series on the history of talkers, with the asserted notoriety in relation to the conversial elements of this talker.  However, in retrospect, having an individual article purely to document controversies is something that I think is probably not a good idea.  I have been considering merging the controversies in to Planes of Existence (talker) for some time, as was suggested by a number of users (indeed, some suggested merely documenting important events of talkers in to one article, which has merit).  I did try to redirect this article and merge it so as to avoid an edit war, but this did not work and have stopped editing due to the 3RR rule.  It seems understandably that the owner of this particular talker does not want to have an article created about them for what they perceive to be an attack page, and there have been irreconcilable issues with regards to resolving its .  The talker itself asserts no claims to notoriety.  Its main page has an alexa rank of over 5 million, it was never the most popular talker in history (indeed, never in the top 10), was not the first to do anything and is not unique in any way.  Whilst there are assertions that it was the first to combine talker and muds, this is not true.  TinyMUD was in fact the first to do this, in 1989, 7 years before this talker was created, when they created MUSH.  Other than the many controversies surrounding this particular talker, it has no assertions to notoriety.  I do feel rather sheepish for nominating an article that I created for deletion, but I also feel that this is a good way to resolve disputes and hopefully stop the plague of vandalism that has hit this and related pages in the past few days.  I would have suggested merge, but as all of the notable things about this talker are listed elsewhere, there is no longer any point to it.  Hence I would like to suggest an outright delete
— User:Zordrac, 03:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)