Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of politicians in India charged with corruption
I think it would appropriate to have an article about those who have been ''convicted''.  The mere fact that they've been ''charged'' (or in many cases in this article, merely ''accused'') is not appropriate to mention.  Anyone can accuse anyone of anything.  The mere fact of reporting the allegation may do political damage even if the person is innocent, and we have to presume they ''are'' innocent until a Court finds them guilty.  Therefore, I have ,  and specifically  concerns with this list.  I think the situation is different in specific articles.  Compare and contrast Julian Assange who has been accused of a crime but not charged or convicted.  Because Assange is vastly notable for other reasons, because he has been through an exhaustive appeal process and a Court has found that he has a case to answer, and through sheer volume of coverage, it ''is'' appropriate to mention that Assange has been accused of offences in the article about him.  But I do not think it would be appropriate to list him in a List of Australian journalists charged with sex crimes, if we had such a thing
— User:S, 23:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)