Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Chocolate
WP:ITSSOURCED is not a valid reason to keep an article. The thing that defines the otability of a subject covered here is not just the quality of the source but the type of source. outine coverage in eliable sources does not confer notability to a subject, and a product review is the definition of routine coverage. As the majority of the sources fall under routine coverage or are rimary in nature, I see no notability in the subject. If you could find sources that meet the ourcing standards here, I would easily support its inclusion
— User:Jerem43, 03:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:R||WP:R||WP:P||WP:S (Wikipedia:Notability)