Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Yarmush
The subject does appear to be notable, and justified in having an article.  appears to be met by number of published papers Though there is a content dispute. The subject of the article though should not determine the content.  What is in there should be determined by what the references say. The style of the writing at maximum size has some puffery and peacock terms, so I can see that could lead to embarrassment. Can Timjm please disclose if they have a  on this topic? If they work for Martin Yarmush then this may explain the content addition and removal
— User:Graeme, 22:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)