Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture
Here's what I think: peer-reviewed academic journals should be automatically in, period. If you wanna call that logic a manifestation of |IGNORE ALL RULES, fine. Here's why though. This is an encyclopedia based upon footnoting to so-called reliable sources. The highest order of these are peer-reviewed academic journals. There are hundreds and probably thousands of them, and we as Wikipedias occasionally need to make use of a roadmap to see the terrain. If somebody cites this journal or that there are sometimes circumstances when further investigation is necessary. Wikipedia articles on these journals should be part of our investigative process — a quick and easy part. If we're gonna go tossing articles on journals just because their sourcing is sub-optimal or their information is largely self-sourced, we're cutting off our nose to spite our face. A comprehensive encyclopedia ''needs to contain this information
— User:Carrite, 17:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)