Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawcett City
No reliable, secondary sources appear to discuss the city in any way that would allow it to pass the .  The argument that it is notable in-universe are not valid in establishing real-world notability.  The proposed merge/redirect target is another mess of cruft that is sourced only to primary sources, and I don't see how adding even more unreferenced cruft would improve matters
— User:Rorshacma, 16:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)