Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajam
An enormous  indeed... with derivation, historical overview of usage, references to a number of reliable secondary sources as well as to primary sources, and notes on usage outside the main definition, even as it changed over time.  Would have to be trimmed of most of these to be included in a dictionary, as in its current form it would be more appropriate as an encyclopaedia article
— User:Shirt58, 10:37, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)