Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay slang words and phrases (second nom)
per  and Wikipedia:Verifiability.  My concern with a slang list is that anyone can come along and add words to the list that are extremely local, rarely used, or even bald-faced neologisms.  If we don't require that use of the terms be verified, what good is the article?  I think we should include only those terms that have documentably widespread use.  That would undoubtably decimate this list, and the terms that are left over are going to be those that are already mentioned in other articles (Transgender|MTF and FTM, Bisexual|Ambisexual) or are important enough to have an article of their own (Gaydar, Bear community, Twink (gay slang)).  So, out with the list.  Seriously, what good is it?  You can't use it to learn slang for conversation because you have no way of knowing whether a term on the list is completely unknown in your area or hopelessly out-of-date, and you can't use it for research because there's not enough information and it's unverified
— User:AdelaMae, 00:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)