Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelma Maine-Jackson
She appears not to be an academic or research scientist at all, so judging her by  is inappropriate. Instead, the relevant notability criterion for someone like her should be , which demands multiple sources that are independent of her, in-depth, and reliably published. The story by the Nature Conservancy appears to be in-depth, but non-independent because she's a trustee. On the other hand, the ''Scientific American'' and ''Northwest Public Broadcasting'' stories do seem to be in-depth and independent, giving her the minimum for notability
— User:David, 08:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)