Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resilient control systems (2nd nomination)
Neither tone nor CoI are causes for deletion: tone is resolved by editing, and CoI by careful attention to neutrality. Actually neither tone nor NPOV appear especially problematic in the article as it is today, but please feel free to edit it to read better. Clarity isn't a cause for deletion either; and again, the article is pretty clear. On sourcing, I haven't attempted to check the dozens of sources supplied, but with this thoroughly referenced an article, I don't think there's a '''|SNOW'''ball's chance of deletion on grounds on notability. That leaves the question of self-plagiarism: not an ideal situation; but as nom notes, the article has already been heavily edited since it was drafted
— User:Chiswick, 07:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)