Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Duchesne
Fails . Beyond that, fails : If a work receives wide coverage, then an article about the work might be notable, but being notable for a work is not enough for an independent article. There is not enough independent coverage in the RS for an article on the author, but there might be for the book. I think the keep !voters are missing this very important point. Furthermore, his book is not a peer-reviewed book, so citations in academia are irrelevant. A look at the citations shows he is not being cited as an authority, but mostly to question him: ''notoriety'' of a promoter of a  idea is not enough to establish ''notability''. Also resumecruft per COI
— User:Cerejota, 23:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Notability)