Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Pakistan relations
let's go through each cited reference to show why we have nothing resembling a valid article so far. Links 1 and 2 are primary sources (produced by the Pakistani government) and thus fail the requirement for "independence from the subject" mandated by . Really, do you think minutes and declarations of meetings can be used as reliable sources? Link 3 violates , but even if it didn't, the information is trivial and irrelevant. Again: do you see this information being used ''anywhere else'' on Wikipedia? No, it's only being included here out of a perceived "need" to "expand" this article. It says nothing about "Argentina–Pakistan relations", but rather about what the editor who added it ''thinks'' constitutes Argentina–Pakistan relations, but is in fact trivial in the extreme. Link 4 is about Brazil, so that's irrelevant. Link 5 is an essay by the Canadian Government which in any case says nothing specifically about Argentina–Pakistan relations. Links 6 and 7 are directories, and as pointed out, Diplomatic missions of Pakistan and Diplomatic missions of Argentina fully cover that information already. Still waiting on any "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - none of the references do that yet. Let's not allow our standards to slip just to fill a perceived need, all right
— User:Biruitorul, 01:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:Notability)