Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turbulence: Ideas for Movement
or incubate) I'm puzzled that an editor with three years experience and thousands of edits would consider this article acceptable. While there is  some value in helping out a brand-new editor who doesn't know what is required, help find some  and maybe the article can survive. I know I am supposed to , but I feel like an editor wants an article on this subject, and wants others to do the hard work. Acceptable from a newbie, not from someone who has been here this long. I did look at a few pages of Google hits, but didn't find anything that would qualify it to be a notable publication. This is a very new publication, and I can understand why they would like a Wikipedia entry to get the word out, but we are supposed to add magazines after they become notable, not help them become notable. If someone finds any worthwhile links, and it looks like it could survive with work, consider the incubator. otherwise it should be deleted without prejudice, as it may be notable in the future
— User:Sphilbrick, 23:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)