Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harris Mayer
ping|Smmurphy}} I have to say I'm not seeing anything useful in that material.  It's essentially "Mayer, as a student, continued the work of Teller, which Rosenbluth finished."  One, we still have no idea what that work was, and two, if it wasn't finished, I still feel no more enlightened as to Mayer's contributions than I was without it.  Is there anything else there?  I am having a difficult time asserting notability of an individual who has a serious  issue; ''nowhere'' is it stated what Mayer ''did'', and it's only made worse by the fact that whatever he did apparently wasn't finished.  This is the problem - if someone does something that's classified and we therefore don't know what it is, I don't think it's appropriate to have a WP article based on a presumption of notability.  That's all I'm seeing here. I suppose what concerns me particularly is that almost no one mentions him, and he's hardly published - I looked up Oppenheimer, and he's still got a ton of papers despite probably being one of the ''most'' classified people on the project
— User:MSJapan, 17:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)