Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Croatia (2nd nomination)
for 2 reasons. 1) procedural: there no notice on the article suggesting it's up for deletion -- perhaps the stealth is part of the deletion agenda?? 2) substantive: there is/was a Red Croatia, it is well documented in the article, which is well-referenced as these things go, and is admitted by the nominator. The fact that the nominator believes a great part of the article (mostly dealing with modern (mis)uses of the term) belongs elsewhere doesn't provide grounds for deleting the historically valid parts. If you believe things ought to be moved: be |bold and move them, don't delete the parts we all think ought to remain
— User:Carlossuarez46, 01:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BOLD (Wikipedia:Be bold)