Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Urdang
and send to cleanup. A pity that the article |has not received the wikilove it deserves, as the subject is |indeed covered in independent sources. For example, a quck look finds ''Boston Globe'' speaking toward the filmmaker when writing http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2008/12/04/nervous_time_for_indie_films_headed_for_sundance/ "Veteran Los Angeles film producer Leslie Urdang stands among the most fortunate independent filmmakers."  and ''The New York Times'' writing http://www.nytimes.com/1991/11/29/movies/at-the-movies.html?pagewanted=2&src=pm "Leslie Urdang and her colleagues have been tapping the talent of New York's theater community..." and also http://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/17/theater/hey-kids-let-s-put-on-a-show.html "Leslie Urdang was going to be a senator, until she got a job with one."  And there are many more such that speak about the person directly and in some detail.http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Leslie+Urdang%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#q=%22Leslie+Urdang%22&hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&ei=oFldTtS6I46nsQLw2YlB&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=e12f4fb57b603324&biw=768&bih=398http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Leslie+Urdang%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#q=%22Leslie+Urdang%22&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=np&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=87c1ad1c208692a6&biw=768&bih=398  That a filmmaker and her work are written about in  multiple sources shows notability per  and . Sure the article needs work, but |lack of work is not a decent reason to delete what can be |addressed through normal editing, specially as recognition of |notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 22:02, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOEFFORT||WP:NRVE||WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:ATD||WP:NRVE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)