Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate change alarmism (2nd nomination)
The deletion arguments seem spurious.  is not an argument, especially not when several scholarly articles address the topic. There is certainly more than enough to merit . As for the POV-fork argument, i find that equally spurious, since Global warming controversy is already bloated, and has had to be plitting|split several times. Denialism is at the other end of the spectrum - so a POV fork from that it certainly isn't either
— User:KimDabelsteinPetersen, 23:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:GNG||WP:S (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)