Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakini
exactly.  A merge does not necessarily denote that the entirety fo both articles needs to exist in one merged article.  What can be sourced from the current Dakini should be retained.  What cannot be sourced should be removed from the article as |unverified.  From the looks of it Dakini(Buddhism) is well sourced and the info there should be incorporated back into the Dakini with a redirect from Dakini(Buddhism) to Dakini.  The point is that all of this effort could be '''boldly''' done without an AfD; This is a content issue and there is nothing here that needs to be deleted.  If there is a problem with this because specific editors don't agree with this course of action or are reverting changes without discussion than this is a situation that needs to be dealt with through a Request for Comment or Mediation.  Bottom line, there is really no reason for an AfD here
— User:Isotope23, 19:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)