Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bank of America controversies
while a "controversy" page ''may'' in some cases be encyclopedic, the use of the plural indicates it is an indiscriminate list of gripes that an anti-BoA editor has collected to |push an anti-BoA point of view. There is a reason why "controversy" is on our list of |words to avoid: it often, when used incorrectly, assumes a point of view against the subject. This appears to be no different. This page can never be neutral because it inherently discourages/forbids any sources that are positive about the BoA, thus creating an unworkable |undue weight problem. The solution to dealing with this is deletion, as it can't be dealt with in any editorial way
— User:Sceptre, 13:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SOAP||WP:WTA||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)