Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympic Medal Statistics: Medal Count Winners
as per nom.   is quite clear that Wikipedia articles cannot "introduce an ''analysis or synthesis of established facts'', ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, ''without attributing the analysis or synthesis to a reputable source''".  That is the case here.  Medal tables from individual games (e.g. 2004 Summer Olympics medal count) have clear references (e.g http://www.olympic.org/uk/games/past/table_uk.asp?OLGT=1&OLGY=2004 IOC website).  Cumulative tables, such as Total Olympics medal count, to be free of "introducing a new analysis or synthesis" of these counts, can do no more than simply sum up the totals by each List of IOC country codes|IOC country code.  Anything more is original research, as defined by Wikipedia
— User:Andrwsc, 10:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)