Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UrbanClap (4th nomination)
I had a good look at the sources and I'm sorry, but they do not satisfy . For example, http://www.firstpost.com/business/start-up-india-urbanclaps-focus-on-local-services-benefitting-both-customers-and-service-professionals-2584310.html the Firstpost source is ''entirely written by the co-founder''. And yet, we have people quoting it for notability (This points to a greater problem here - editors do not inspect the source. They just look at a source and think it is OK. I find this pretty bad because Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and we are supposed to hold stuff to an academic standard here. We definitely need to be sceptic about sources and analyse them carefully.) The sources in Times of India/Economic Times (all part of the same media group) are not useful either - they are either interviews of the founders or routine news about the company mergers/finances. http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/urbanclap-launches-initiative-to-curb-wastage-of-water-in-mumbai/article8479629.ece The Hindu businessline source is a very brief coverage with stuff like ''{{tq|Those who wish to avail themselves of this service can log on to the app, place a request for Save Water Mumbai, and they will be visited by trained plumbers from UrbanClap who will fix the leaking taps. The activity will run for a week, until Friday, April 22nd.}}'' - like someone didn't even bother to redress the press release. There is nothing here which substantially focuses on the company and explains why it is notable
— User:Lemongirl942, 07:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPIND (Wikipedia:Notability)