Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellensburg community radio
While Carrite is correct that an online, non-licensed internet radio stream can still have a Wikipedia article if it can be shown to clear , he isn't actually correctly evaluating whether the sources he's offering are ''doing'' that or not. "MyEllensburg" is a tourism site, not a media outlet, and the "article" there is quite plainly a PR piece rather than neutral coverage. University ''student'' media cannot be used to show notability either — it can be cited for supplementary sourcing of stray facts ''after'' GNG has ''already'' been covered off by more solid sourcing, but because of its limited niche audience, subencyclopedic focus (e.g. university newspaper coverage is ''not'' going to get the president of that university's LGBT student association into Wikipedia on "GNG met because media coverage exists" grounds), and lack of wider distribution or archivability, it can't be a ''bringer'' of GNG if it's nearly the ''best'' you can do for sourcing. So neither of those count for anything at all, leaving us with ''only'' the ''Daily Record'' for GNG-carrying references — but since internet radio streams don't get an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, it takes ''more'' than just one GNG-carrying reference to ''pass'' GNG or . So no, we simply don't have what it takes here
— User:Bearcat, 18:08, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ORGDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)