Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Featherproof books
More than passes |general notability with multiple, nontrivial mentions in verifiable, reliable sources.   It doesn't even require extra research; the information is right there in the article. It shouldn't matter where it operates from or whether or not it is an incorporated company; mentions in RS are all that matter, and the subject has those.  I don't find the deletion arguments very persuading since they seem to disregard that
— User:Celarnor, 16:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)