Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocentric universe
Obviously this article isn't getting deleted, but I'm concerned about the push to merge the article. The subject means GNG from the sources already in the article, and |notability is not temporary. To merge the article would make no sense, as this article is quite lengthy in comparison to the Lanza article and merging it would give undue balance to the subject of Biocentrism in Lanza's career if added to his page. That means a lot of this article would have to be removed (items that are well-sourced) in order to not create an undue balance to the subject in the Lanza article. It is a sneaky backdoor way of culling parts of the article, rather than letting it stand, in my opinion. Many of these arguments here are based on the faulty belief that academic articles are required to discuss a hypothetical situation, which is just not true. News sources are fine. It is also complete nonsense that a concept must have a lot of adherents to appear on Wikipedia; it just has to be notable. There seems to be a whole lot of  going on here
— User:Jeremy112233, 19:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)