Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XEAR
The guidelines governing this, , ask for sources and references from some editorially independent venues -- which this lacks. News coverage, reviews, even posts in well-regarded blogs can help. {{reply to|carsten.schipke}} Typically, an article must pass tests of erifiability, eliable Sources, ikipedia is not, and otability. Most articles here pass the first 3, and then we argue about notability, which is essentially what people in the discussion say it is. My recommendation here though is based primarily on the lack of sources in your article and my inability to find any. Because of the self-promotion that sometimes occurs, the policies for inclusion of companies (and people) are quite exclusive (be publicly traded). I would suggest an article for your product(s), which will could be covered in the press, academically, and on the Web in a way that may merit inclusion.--Special:Contributions/69.204.153.39|69.204.153.39
— [[User talk:69.204.153.39|talk]]), 01:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:V||WP:R||WP:W||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)