Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana DeArmond
bad faith nom and patent lack of , clearly passes GNG and , and at the time of nomination the article already contained several RS supporting, or at least suggesting, a claim of notability. A whole chapter devoted to the subject in Julia Angwin's book ''Pornography and Seriality: The Culture of Producing Pleasure'', several pages in Rich Moreland's ''Pornography Feminism'', the ''Las Vegas Sun'', ''Esquire (magazine)|Esquire'' or ''The Daily Beast|Daily Beast'' articles clearly are not "a passing mention". Furthermore she was interviewed in ''Cosmopolitan (magazine)|Cosmopolitan'' http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/news/a5460/porn-stars-talk-fitness-and-body-image/ and http://edition.cnn.com/2012/07/19/showbiz/porn-stars-twitter/ in this ''CNN'' article
— User:Cavarrone, 06:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)