Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Chang
I think the responses by native speakers above answered my WP:Verification concerns. The person seem to be notable simply per , i.e. "a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article" ("Significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.") The multiple sources, such as Radio Free Asia, do qualify as RS. Yes, the page is written as if someone wanted to prove that he was oppressed to receive a refugee status ("he was also oppressed directly by the Diplomatic Missions of China in Australia" and so on). However, this is not a valid reason for deletion, but something to be fixed
— User:My, 15:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)