Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saba Ahmed
People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being unsuccessful candidates in party primaries, but this does not make any strong claim that she has preexisting notability for other reasons. The existence of a profile in ''The New York Times'' is not in and of itself a magic bullet that inherently exempts her from having to clear the deliberately high bar we set for non-winning candidates — the rule most certainly is ''not'' that a person at this level of significance clears the bar the moment ''one'' piece of extralocal coverage exists, it's that enough extralocal coverage has to exist to get her over the |ten-year test as a topic of ''enduring'' significance. What I am ''not'' seeing here, however, is a credible reason to believe people will still be looking for this article in 2028. She might attain something like that in the future, certainly, and if that happens then a new article can be recreated at that time — but nothing here is a credible reason why she could be considered to have already cleared the ten-year test today
— User:Bearcat, 18:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Recentism)