Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics of Gatineau Park
This article makes a strong case in support of the writer's goal rather than a balanced and objective portrayal of the topic suggested by its title. It makes one side of an argument and in so doing fails to meet the fundamental principle that articles must have a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view.  It should be kept somewhere, but not in Wikipedia.  Advocacy, even if the position advanced is worthy and desirable (who knows because we only have one side of this story) has no place in an encyclopaedia.  See .  Rather than asking whether it can be made into something that has a place here, the question should be why try to change it into something it isn't.  The changes it needs would change the whole nature of the article. Rather than asking whether a sow's ear can be turned into a silk purse, the question should be why try? It should go someplace else, it has no place here
— User:KenWalker, 08:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTADVOCATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)