Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EconLog
per nom. Clearly self sourced to an excess: citations 1 through 30! But it gets worse after that. The non-self-sourced citations start in the "Reception" section, where WSJ and Onalytica Indexes each list it in directories as one of N blogs, then several sources are used to show "blog entries have been referenced by many blogs and newspapers" or similar weak attempts at riding coattails of other notables. The first fails to help here: "directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined" per otability. The second fails flat per OTINHERITED
— User:Bri, 19:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Notability)