Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitty (cricketer)
or merge to (a single sentence in) any relevant article.  This fails even the lowest interpretation of GNG, and failing GNG so completely matters, because if you can't pass GNG, then you can't actually write a decent encyclopedia article.  This article fails :  it is not a subject about which enough verifiable information can be found to write an encyclopedia article.  Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate, all-inclusive database with a separate record for each person who can be documented to have ever played one game.  Think about what's being defended here:  The thoughtless "Keep per NCRICKET" votes are asking us to have a completely separate, stand-alone page for someone about whom almost nothing is known, or will ever be known.  We literally don't even know whether "Chitty" is his first name, last name, nickname, or only name.  This is not a suitable subject for a proper encyclopedia article.  Should this player be in Wikipedia somewhere?  Sure.  Should this player be on a separate, stand-alone page?  No
— User:WhatamIdoing, 17:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WHYN (Wikipedia:Notability)