Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracey Curtis-Taylor
and redirect for now. I think this article may now fall into . Against that is the continuing press coverage of the controversy and the (arguable) point about her exploits being independently notable, outside of the busted claim about flying solo. Are they? That's what this debate should centre around. An article which mainly discusses the controversy around her claims and the rescinded award isn't viable, but is that all that can be sourced? If it is, it should maybe redirect to and be a short mention in Amy Johnson. Remember that if we went down this road there would be no prejudice against recreating the article if someone was to write a book or make a movie in the future, or if the subject does something else more notable. I incidentally also think, ethically, it might be kinder to the subject to delete and redirect for now. Pragmatically, if this article is kept it will continue to generate work for those of us committed to maintaining BLP standards. Are those !voting keep willing to assist in this? I suspect the answer is "no
— User:John, 01:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)