Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House)
That the articles do not ''currently'' meet the standards of  is irrelevant; the question of whether they should be deleted should be based on whether reliable, third-party sources exist to a sufficient degree that an encyclopedic treatment beyond a cursory plot description would be ''possible''.  Other editors have shown that books discussing the show's production and medical/ethical commentary on each episode exist; these could and should be used to beef up the articles.  The source material is there; all that's needed is for an editor to do the work of putting it into the article
— User:Josiah, 21:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PLOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)