Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presidential prevarications (United States)
My above four reasons: POV warring hasn't happened; if it does, we'll deal with it then and even if it does, it will probably a good thing. It isn't partisan (both R and D presidents are included). The subject of which lies to include will always be subject to debate, but it's very similar to  and ; we're talking notable lies, important ones, whoppers. The article is well referenced. Last, it holds politicians feet to the fire; if they LIE, they go in WIKIPEDIA. An incentive to TELL THE TRUTH. And, moreover, let me just say, although this ISN'T a valid Wikipedia criteria for inclusion, but it IS for me; this article is fun
— User:Tomwsulcer, 19:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:VERIFY||WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Verifiability)