Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Yu-Gi-Oh! cards
The question here is not whether each individual card is notable (some appear to be), nor is it whether the game itself is notable (it clearly is). Per  (which has been incorrectly interpreted and linked to multiple times during this discussion), the question is whether the grouping/set of cards ''itself'' is notable. So far that answer appears to be no, and so far no one asking for this article's preservation has brought forth evidence (in the form of multiple |reliable sources) to show otherwise. To metaphorically illustrate what I'm saying: We have an article on the game Monopoly (game)|Monopoly, as the game ''itself'' is relevant. But, we ''do not'' have a list of Monopoly property, chance, or community chest cards, since those sets are not independently notable from the game and do not have an independent (from the game) parent article. As many others have said, this is probably perfect material for Wikia... and if it's not there already it should be. &mdash
— User:Coffee, 00:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)