Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela Georgieva
or at the very least '''merge''' to a sports list. Sure, she marginally checks some of the boxes at , and sure, if you look hard enough you may find some reliable sources, but it is extremely shocking to me that an AFD for a |BLP would get such a high number of outright keeps when the subject of the article has issued a personal appeal for the page to be deleted because it is causes her and her family to suffer. Has the Wikipedian community lost its sence of |common sense and become a box-checking machine? Do the benefits of keeping this article really outweigh the harm we are doing to one person and her family? I expected some discussion, but to see so many "keeps" is both extremely surprising and very sad. Perhaps I've spent too much time away from Wikipedia to notice this change. Let throw out some quotations from our own policy pages and essays
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NTRACK||WP:BLP||WP:COMMON (Wikipedia:Notability)