Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Sakson
My initial response was to vote "delete", since the subject only seems to have one notable credit for the purposes of —but there ''are'' some sources out there, including a very in-depth write-up in the ''Los Angeles Times'' (the first three links): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51092793/jake-sakson-the-los-angeles-times/ here, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51092900/jake-sakson-the-los-angeles-times/ here, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51092940/jake-sakson-the-los-angeles-times/ here and https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51092963/jake-sakson-indiana-gazette/ here. So, combined with the fact that he was nominated for a notable award (even though that doesn't technically meet ), the page might be justifiable on the grounds of 
— User:Dflaw4, 10:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NACTOR||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)