Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human photosynthesis
I agree with the arguments above that this is  and . The journal articles are all either not credible or not relevant, so RS is an issue as well. ''OJPsych'' and ''Neuroscience and Medicine'' are published by Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP), which is on http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/ Beall's list of predatory open access publishers. ''PLOS One'' is peer reviewed, but doesn't really have standards for inclusion. The ''Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish)'' is peer reviewed, though small and open-access. ''Current Biology'' is a real journal, although there are some very similarly named fake ones. So, yes, this is OR, SYN and speculative nonsense. CoI disclaimer: I have no competing interests and have not edited the article. Voting editors with a potential conflict of interest should disclose that here
— User:Roches, 19:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)