Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baroness of Douglas
on the basis on improvements to the article are enough per , mostly the added sources per .  However,  is only invoked when there is an exptremely clear case one way or the other, based on a large number of "!votes" either to keep or to deleted, or when common sense must prevail.  This is actually quite a marginal case per , and common sense does not dictate any one outcome
— User:Bearian, 20:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:HEY||WP:RS||WP:SNOW||WP:BARE (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)