Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (3rd nomination)
per |IAR if nothing else. I think that this article works towards the goal of Wikipedia to bring valuable knowledge to its users, even if it doesn't match the traditional notions of an appropriate article as defined by our current guidelines. Thus, I think keeping this article makes Wikipedia ''better'' regardless of whether it may or may not meet our current standards for an article topic, so I must break out a rare occurrence of IAR. It might be the case that IAR doesn't need to be invoked and that interpretations of policy and/or guidelines would support this being kept, but I don't have the energy to research all that now and considering a finding in the negative wouldn't have changed my mind, IAR it is.  If this is deleted, it would be a real shame to see this information go. I would ask that it at least be moved to Wikipedia space for preservation and maintenance there
— User:VegaDark, 08:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)