Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recombinant text
the term is used in many different ways. For example, "DJ Spooky" used the term in a rap/poetics context in the 1990's. Other people use the term in a hypertext context, but it is uncertain if they are talking about the same thing. And the term was used in an essay on "utopian plagiarism". However, I was unable to find any use of the term in WebofKnowledge or Jstor.org. The article has a much more well-developed definition of recombinant text than can be found anywhere on the internet. The sources provided are all by Mr Allen, except two 1982 books which do not mention the term, and two forums. Therefore the article is in violation of #OR points 1 and 3, and in violation of . The way it is currently written, it is also in violation of #MANUAL. As for the possiblity of rewriting the article, since it is currently missing any independent secondary sources that attest to the notability or importance of the term or the concept, it (the term) fails otability
— User:AnteaterZot, 15:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:SYN||WP:NOT||WP:N (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)