Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luma Health (2nd nomination)
re "which sources are press releases", MedCity News "San Francisco-based patient communication company Luma Health ''announced'' Tuesday", "In the ''news release announcing'' the fundraise, the company stated." Pulse 2.0 "Luma Health ''announced'' it raised $16 million in Series B equity funding", "Luma Health formalized its partnership with Epic and ''announced'' additional EHR integration partnerships." Vator.com "On Tuesday, the company ''announced'' that it raised a $16 million Series B round of funding." Essentially those articles are just summaries of their press releases, with interviews from capital investors or the CEO talking about how great the company will be in the future intermingled in. In no way is that neutral or secondary. It's essentially just a ruse to get investors. Btw, according to  partnerships, found raising, and new product announcements are not usable to establish notability. Id say especially funding. As essentially every startup gets funding when it is first starting out. So, there's nothing unique or notable about it. Especially with these kinds of companies. If you get rid of the four or so articles on that and the few others about products or whatever, there isn't really much left to actually establish notability with
— User:Adamant1, 11:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)