Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans National Place (2nd nomination)
The nomination is way offbase.  There is absolutely nothing in WP:N which suggests that sources need to be recently published, or that building projects need to be active, in order to meet the GNG's requirements.  Just the sources listed in the article are significant ones -- to the ''Boston Globe,'' ''Business Week'' and the ''Boston Herald'' -- and nothing more taxing than clicking the "news" search button on this AfD turns up articles in the New York Times, Boston Business Journal, the Associated Press.  A casual glance at these articles demonstrate that they discuss the subject in "significant detail," as opposed to a sentence or two.  Would the nom care to proffer a valid reason to delete?  In place of his final sentence for which there isn't an actual guideline, I'll tender one that does: |"Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']], 11:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NTEMP (Wikipedia:Notability)