Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Michael (professor)
As mentioned when the prod was declined, the requirement is ''not'' that the article reflect the subject's notability.  But rather than the subject be notable.  It's unclear to me whether this has been understood, and a  analysis of notability outside of a review of the article has been undertaken by the nom.  The nom is required, before making a nomination due to sourcing or notability concerns, to "make a good-faith attempt to confirm that such sources don't exist."  Given that this had already been pointed out at prod, and the nom again limited his criticism ''to what is reflected in the article'', I wonder whether this step was taken, as required.  For example, by reviewing articles in ghits searches such as http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=right-wing+%22george+michael%22++-singer&btnG=Search+Archives&num=100&hl=en&ned=us&scoring=a this one, and gbooks searches such as http://books.google.com/books?q=right-wing%20%22george%20michael%22%20%20-singer&num=100&hl=en&ned=us&sa=N&tab=np this one
— User:Epeefleche, 02:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)