Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barandal
It seems there are plenty of !votes that only say "Keep per ". But the guideline says: {{gi|Populated, legally-recognized places are typically considered notable, even if their population is very low.}} As I said above, just saying "per " is a really weak reason to keep an article because the guideline only says that such places are "typically considered notable" which is different from "always considered notable". As such, there should be additional supporting evidence that the article's topic would be considered typically notable. Lacking such evidence, we default back to the basic  guideline that requires reliable sources, which the nominator argues that there is hardly any for the currently AfD
— User:Seav, 22:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GEOLAND||WP:GEOLAND||WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Notability)