Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women in Shakespeare (2nd nomination)
per  as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women in Shakespeare|previous AFD closed as keep and as nominator here has also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Women_in_Shakespeare_(2nd_nomination)&diff=287499664&oldid=287498472 withdrawn the nomination.  Anyway, an obviously notable and verifiable and encyclopedic topic concerning depiction of characters in one of the all-time most significant playwright's plays, many of which have also been adapted into films.  And yes, even print encyclopedias specifically discuss the topic of how Shakespeare depicted women (see for example http://books.google.com/books?id=v_OkSkFriAgC&pg=PA1313&dq=women+Shakespeare+encyclopedia&ei=rvb9SeW_MImGNLLvsesD here).  What's good for actual print encyclopedias is surely good for paperless ones.  Sure article can be improved, but so can pretty much everything.  Sincerely
— User:A, 19:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)