Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick G. Strickland
mostly per  along the lines of what DGG already said. But I think https://books.google.com/books?id=eX0QOpl7iBQC&pg=PA1833 his inclusion in the 1908 Who's Who (back when that meant something) also goes a long way towards . Also I think the De Leon source should be removed per ; it is clearly editorial in nature and would not be tolerated as a source if the subject were living, so why is it ok in this case
— User:David, 11:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RECENT||WP:GNG||WP:ATTACK (Wikipedia:Recentism)