Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxbridge
That pretty much sums up my position exactly; while the ''idea'' of an article on this topic has some merit (e.g. a short stub explaining where the term comes from and what it signifies) nearly all of the current article content is |original research; it's essentially unsourced editorial opinion at the minute and it would need, as you say, a total rewrite to fix - I don't think that's a practical solution. Best to nuke and start again IMO
— User:Coldmachine, 15:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)