Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art student scam
no policy violation was cited in the nomination...this appears to be a case of . There are sufficient reliable sources in the article to show notability. Also, as no one else has linked it: |Wikipedia is not censored. I don't understand the purpose of deleting an article if it's not fully NPOV...it ought to be fixed...and deletion isn't the fix. It's unfortunate that its taking so much time from
— User:Preciseaccuracy, 14:23, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)