Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Engelbrecht
Not in the slightest.  I have stated my case for the |notability of the film and there are a large number of references for its |verifiability.  The only arguement that keeps coming back is |conflict of interest and yet no one has pointed out what about the article is not neutral.  In all honesty the pages have no value to me whatsoever apart from the time it took me to assemble them.  I am insulted about the attack being extended to the Lausanne Underground Film and Music Festival and having read the article on Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement|vanispamcruftisement all becomes clear.  There is a policy here by certain people to attack pages that are not mainstream.  Otherwise give arguements why a film which won first prize at a world reknown underground film festival and has appeared at numerous other film festivals throughout Switzerland and Italy (Two of those festivals asked for it to be included without our applying) is not |notable
— User:Geoff13, 06:50, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:COI||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)