Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISLA Bank
Although the evidence isn't quite so strong as I'd like.  The notability criteria should be out of  and not just the general vague notability preference here.  A Google test may not necessarily be the best possible source of information in this case, and I'm unfortunately not familiar with sources in the Philippines to provide a more useful source of information to help out in this case.  With the only current "source" of information being the official website, I find that to be dubious, but I'm quite certain that there are some additional sources of information for this institution that could be found to meet the raw sourcing requirements.  The real hook, something that makes this more than just another bank, is something that would be useful for the article.  In this sense, notability is the issue and if something more about the bank being "established from a rich Filipino heritage" could be defined or expanded... what heritage they are really talking about in the article could make this something useful.  At the moment, it reads like an advertisement and not something encyclopedic
— User:Robert, 14:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COMPANY (Wikipedia:Notability)