Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best
This meets criteria of  and  and is well sourced. With respects to TPH above, the criteria for inclusion on their specific lists are set by the sources provided, and we are not here to place a personal or arbitrary criteria for such... only to report and share their findings. If the list seems too long to some, then a split might be discussed on its talk page, and does not require a deletion. We do not judge the truth or not of the criteria used by the various organizations and sources for inclusion in their lists, just so long as the information provided is verifiable in sources deemed suitable for offering their judgements. As long as the list remains sourced and is not indescriminate, it serves the project and our readers. I wish to remind the http://toolserver.org/~tparis/pcount/index.php?name=FnH&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia 8-edit nominator that EVERYTHING included in Wikipedia is to be based on the |reliable sources we find on the web and elsewhere, just so long as the source is considered reliable enough for the information being sourced. We accept that American Film Institute may report on the films ''they'' consider "top". We accept that The Moving Arts Film Journal may report on the films ''they'' consider "top". We accept that IGN may report of whatever films ''they'' consider "top". We accept that Rotten Tomatoes may report of whatever films ''they'' consider "top". We accept that BBC News may report of whatever films ''they'' consider "top". We accept that Entertainment Weekly may report of whatever films they consider "top". We accept that Time (magazine) may report of whatever films they consider "top".  We do not demand or expect that all sources use the exact same criteria. As the threshold for inclusion is beased upon verifiability, and not what may or may not be a ''subjective'' or ''objective'' truth, we judge the messenger, not the message. And to address your comparison... |IF a set of experts decided to offer opinions on what they considered the best colors and why, we could consider an article. But |that's an argument for a different discussion.  The list is definitely not "against everything Wikipedia stands for" as Wikipedia specifically has criteria for such lists
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 01:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTPURP||WP:SALAT||WP:RS||WP:WAX||WP:WAX (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)