Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinky (pornographic actress)
I'm afraid I must side with Hullaballoo Wolfowitz on this one. Frankly, I am offended by implication that the subject's ethnicity imparts notability. African Americans are no longer as rare as they once were, though, |assuming Good Faith, your neighborhoods may differ. I don't think that merely being of African descent constitutes Notability anymore, and I believe consensus will back me up. We learn from the article that the subject copulates. Well, we all do this, individually and in concert with others, given the opportunity, don't we? Indeed most of us-- ''regardless of ethnic background''-- would not be here today without someone having copulated with someone or something else. As such it is no different from any other bodily function done on a semi-regular basis... Moving one's bowels for example. The "award", I regard as simply a pat on the back for a job well done. Who among us has ''not'' given his or her partner a pat on the back after a rousing bout of sex? (Indeed, even if it were ''not'' so rousing, simply out of common courtesy.) To carry the analogy further, this would be no different from showing one's spouse a particularly impressive bowel movement, and getting a "Wow!" or "Wouldja look at that!" out of him or her. Again, who among us has not done this? So the "Keep" votes boil down to claiming that Wikipedia needs an article on every (1) American of African ancestry who has (2) had sex and (3) received a pat on the back. This is like claiming we need an article on every (1) Irishman who has (2) taken a really big dump and then (3) shown it proudly to his admiring wife. Ridiculous. Gentlemen, I urge you to consider Wikipedia's reputation as a bastion of reasoned discussion, and join me in voting '''Delete'''. Thank you
— User:Dekkappai, 18:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)