Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cato Research
non consumer consultancy businesses need to show independent references and make a fairly strong case for notability at the start.  This page itself seems to argue instead that it is notable because of its allegedly unique or innovative business model: ''This page is significant because Cato Research was the first CRO to establish a venture arm which exchanges development services for equity in early stage pharmaceutical companies ...''  Aside from the stylistic flaw of arguing notability in the article's text, this does not meet the criteria of independent, third-party notice that constitute the basic |criterion for notability
— User:Ihcoyc, 15:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)