Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventh-day Adventist historicist interpretations of Bible prophecy (2nd nomination)
nbsp; Note that independence is an issue for notability, not for reliability.&nbsp; What matters to Wikipedia is reliability.&nbsp; Not only that, notability cannot be challenged at this AfD, because this is a spinout article.&nbsp; {{parabr}}Nor is the analysis of independence correct, as the essay cited in the nomination, , states that independence avoids "undue attention to the subject's own views."&nbsp; What are the views of the subject here?&nbsp; Does this subject have money in the bank being used to get the views from Daniel represented in front of the views from Revelation?&nbsp; Where is the evidence?&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 00:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)