Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enochlophobia (2nd nomination)
Voting keep on the same grounds as I did in the initial AfD. That the term has "infested the 'net" and "even books" is pretty clearly, to me, grounds for inclusion, not grounds for deletion. If it's a neologism, it appears to be a pretty sticky one. I support the deletion of neologisms in obvious cases where the term is either brand new and/or popped up on the web for a brief period a few years ago and then fell away. This does not appear to be the case with this term. "No such medical term" seems almost like an |I don't like it type of argument
— User:Ginsengbomb, 16:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)