Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlayRadioPlay!
Your argument here is a perfect example of  and . Just because someone ''is going'' to be successful soon doesn't mean they're notable ''now'', unless it can be verified with independent sources. Likewise, just because there are plenty of other Wikipedia articles on obscure bands doesn't mean that those articles ''belong'' on Wikipedia - it just means no one's bothered to nom them for deletion yet. A MySpace page doesn't constitute evidence of notability, even if it gets a lot of traffic.  demands ''third-party reliable sources'', i.e. sources independent of the band itself
— User:Walton, 16:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:MUSIC (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)