Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakhill Christian School
or preferably '''merge and redirect''' to the city's section on education because we don't have '''significant coverage''' of the '''school itself''' in '''third-party''' reliable sources, which is required by the policy at erifiability so that |we could actually write an entire article that contains more than just what the subject says about itself, which in turn is required by the  policy.  We haven't found of have anything about the school that isn't in the small local newspaper, which is a violation of  (which has explicitly included schools and other educational institutions for years).  I know that there are a handful of (almost always younger) editors who want to believe that anybody who claims to issue diplomas that they label "high school" deserves to have an entire article about it in Wikipedia because they're just so terribly important to high school students.  I know there are people who are just sick of the disputes and so vote to keep all "high school" articles in the belief that suspending good judgment will make it go away.  But just like the essay at NHS says, an '''unaccredited''' "high school" that graduates a couple of students a year is little more than a home school, and without '''independent''' sources, we can't actually write a balanced article.  We should no more keep this article than we should keep one on "WhatamIdoing's Ballet High School
— User:WhatamIdoing, 16:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:WHYN||WP:NPOV||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)