Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for European Policy Analysis
Perhaps  criterion 1 should be considered as extending/applying to thinktanks ("...research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources"), but it's not at all clear that that would be met by CEPAhttps://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Center+for+European+Policy+Analysis%22&oq=ce. Another possibility would be if there were evidence of significant coverage of some of their activities including the CEPA Forum. A third possibility would be if there were sufficient offline coverage. On the one hand, it doesn't appear to meet ORGDEPTH / GNG. On the other hand, I know that HARMLESS and a (weak) USEFUL are , but... HARMLESS and USEFUL as this article links several bluelinked people; doesn't redirect anywhere cleanly; and can centralise material that would otherwise be reasonable to have at those members' articles, and that wouldn't nicely crosslink between those members
— User:Hydronium, 12:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC||WP:ATA (Wikipedia:Notability)