Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rihaan Patel
The issues of tone and citation format have been addressed.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rihaan_Patel&action=historysubmit&diff=479070644&oldid=478832910  The filmmaker and his work have received enough recognition by |reliable sources to meet  and . To disagree with the preceding editor and the nominator, the sources ''Ahmedabad Mirror''http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/index.aspx?page=article&sectid=3&contentid=200910052009100503135751590711514&sectxslt=&pageno=1 and ''NDTV''http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/amdavadis-film-finds-recognition-in-italy-58166/ comprise somewhat more-than-trivial coverage of the filmmaker and his work. "Substantial" and "Significant" are not the same thing. And toward the nominator's allegation of  (and I've not read anything from this authror granting that he is the subject of the article)... "''if''" the author is the filmmaker himself, all he need do is to be
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 05:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:FILMMAKER||WP:GNG||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)