Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-At-Arms
striking my keep !vote above. I wrote above that there were a few trivial mentions to ''barely'' meet the . But a closer inspection of the sources shows that some of the sources don't mention the subject at all. I remain of the belief that a merge would be an acceptable compromise, as what little sourceable material would be better as part of a proper article instead of a stub (plus unsourced garbage). But I'm watching the discussion shift, and I'd support deletion if it helps form a consensus
— User:Shooterwalker, 05:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)