Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Rail Services
Theres been a lot of  stuff on this right from the nom. initially totally ignoring resources that are not online web text link.  Unfortunately no one with access to those has provided any quotable details.  If removed it will Wikipedia will prove useless at answering the question "What is Eastern Rail Services about?".  Small isn't an issue if its doing something unique, and if it were not unique we'd bundle them into a combined issue.  ERS's concentration on (mainline registered) rolling stock is somewhat unique as far as I am aware.  But we have sufficient.  The (Bumfrey, Steward, 2020) is RS for some but not all details; and shows the prominence of the new sidings.  (Russell, 2018) does not appear like a press release and the information would have been gathered by information.  One mans trivia is important to another, and thats all over Wikipedia and makes it work.  "The Eastern Rail Services acquires Sleeper Mark 2s Today's Railways UK issue 207 March 2019 page 69" looks significant by the other magazines with its implications (I assume) of possible sleeper charter work.  The ORR exemption is a forerunner of something that ought to come, but perhaps at present is  & .  For those wanting a jigsaw or otherwise of the new sidings its here:https://nr.printstoreonline.com/non-operational-railway/great-yarmouth-vauxhall-sidings/yarmouth-vauxhall-station-layout-new-carriage-19868262.html?prodid=80436.  Probably the biggest concern here is possible harrassment to the extent someone outed from the COIN, which is pretty serious, and I and the nominator may be held under investigation for that.  My rule of thumb would be if you re-open an AfD then relist it formally, don't just pretend it never happened, even if it was for a 60 seconds
— User:Djm, 00:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)