Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional films in Seinfeld
I think you are looking at the letter of the law, in this case the , and not he spirit of the law.  The  was created so that we don't have individuals who call themselves "authorities" on a subject giving un-factual information.  For instance, I start an article about Nuclear Fusion because I think it has something to do with an atom and splitting it, and I present that information as factual.  That is where the  comes into play, as that would not be appropriate.  But the rule wasn't put into place to stifle research.  The very idea that someone would do research is inherit in creating an article.  It's the very nature of Wiki.  But, as I said earlier (or later, I don't know where this falls in relation to my other comments), but Wiki is constantly evolving.  And while I agree with you Motor, as this isn't what would be considered a subject that belongs in an encyclopedia, it is that fact that make it an appropriate subject for Wiki.  It is one of the best things about this site, the fact that it contains so much information on such a wide verity of subjects.  I appreciate how Dylan gathered this information and made a page that is easy to understand and navigate.  To delete his work, because it falls within the "gray" area of what is Original Research or what is encyclopedic in nature, would only stifle the creativity that Wiki is based off.  In fact, this discussion is another great thing about Wiki, the fact that so many people with so many different backgrounds and opinons have come together to create a site that one day could rival Google
— User:Reignofjerm, 15:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)