Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race Differences in Intelligence (book)
What counts as "independent" reliable sources about the book? I see that the  | notability guideline for books asks us to look for books that have "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself." I don't think that has happened here. Moreover, the  | general notability guideline reminds Wikipedians to look for a topic that "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" when creating an article. Wikipedia is WP:''not'' | not a directory, and indeed a https://openlibrary.org/ different crowd-sourced project is already attempting to have a webpage for every book. I ask, because there is a book, a reliable secondary source by a professional scholar published by a university press, that points out that many books by Richard Lynn are "reviewed" by reviewers who receive funding from the same ideological funding source that Lynn receives funding from. Below I will include a block quotation from the book (which, oddly, does not appear on Wikipedia with its own stand-alone article, even though it has many independent favorable reviews) to respond to another editor's question here about the reviews that Lynn's book has received
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)