Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Dwight
This is not fair. You expect people to turn up while you guys expect me not to notify them. There is no guideline that people who edit wikipedia twice in a millenia (or, actually, not ever) cannot participate in AfD, nor that opinions of people not checking back soon enough wouldn't matter. Also since it has been proven - as far as I see, but I'm pretty open to run checkuser against me if anyone needs that way of satisfaction - that all the people up there are real, separate and possessing his/her own opinion, I would really appreciate if you would '''not ignore their opinion'''. I already have inserted (some) sources (which possibly could have improved upon); I have already told why sources are hard to find; already told why the person is notable (while I accept that he's on the lower bound of the notability scale for people not being familar with the network and general networking history, still pretty relevant in the course of the shaping if FidoNet which have lead to internet implementation later by the same persons). Also some of you are strongly advised to read , which has been followed in this case (and has been ignored by the labeling above!), an remove ''canvassing'' marks from the people. Thanks
— user:grin, 15:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:APPNOTE (Wikipedia:Canvassing)