Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise (film)
Per Wikipedia:Notability (films) , If all that existed was the press release this would not be a notable subject. However, in this case numerous independent  have deemed the subject of the press release to be notable enough to publish related content. At WP, as a tertiary resource, our responsibility is to summarize such RS regardless of their similarity. Examining Wikipedia:Notability (films) (especially the subsection ), if the press release is the source for our article it should not be kept. However, looking at the second part of that section, the proper consideration is whether sources with reliable publication processes and authoritarian authors have deemed the subject matter to be notable. In this case as {{u|Voceditenore}} has noted, numerous independent sources that have reliable publication processes and authoritarian authors have published content on the film, albeit similar content echoing a press release. Nothing about NFSOURCES says anything about a requirement that the RS have to have a wide variety of opinions. If several independent RS all have the exact same opinions it is no more or less satisfactory than if there is disparity. Clearly, the editors of each publication has independently determined the subject to be notable enough for its audience's attention. The other element of Wikipedia:Notability (films) that is relevant is consideration of its progress per . Clearly principal photography has commenced, making  irrelevant
— User:TonyTheTiger, 06:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NFSOURCES||WP:NFF||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)