Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Klenner
I have rarely seen so many references to an individual source that didn't have the article subject as it's primary focus. Seriously, over thirty references to ''Bitter Blood''? Then there are a huge number of references to Klenner's own work, which are fringe and clearly don't meet . I just don't see significant coverage independent of the subject, per : "{{tq|A fringe subject (a fringe theory, organization or aspect of a fringe theory) is considered notable enough for a dedicated article if it has been referenced extensively, and in a serious and reliable manner, by major publications that are independent of their promulgators and popularizers.}}" So, not orthomolecular journals, not Klenner's own publications, not ''The Healing Factor: Vitamin C Against Disease'', not self-published blogs, and not primary research for medical claims
— User:Tronvillain, 13:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MEDRS||WP:NFRINGE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)