Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richmond Royal Arch Chapter No. 3
per nom.  The sources Doncram is providing are, of course, not independent, as  requires; indeed, the Moore and Snydor cites are written by ''members of the chapter.''  Blueboar's use of the word "conflate" to describe Doncram's actions is not in the least degree confused - any sources or arguments based around the notability of the building in which an organization meets cannot, of course, pertain to the notability of the organization.  That this chapter exists no one disputes; that it is ''notable'' is another matter
— User:Ravenswing, 15:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)