Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krausser–Samwer–Zaccone equation
per the nomination and {{u|Mark viking}}. I looked into this page shortly after it was created and decided that it was pushing a |neologism for a topic that didn't have enough coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. At the time, I didn't have the energy to start an AfD (and the matter did not seem very pressing), but now that somebody else has, I'll chime in with my opinion. Age is a red herring; what matters is coverage in |secondary and tertiary sources establishing that the topic is significant and that the scientific community has given it a standardized name
— User:XOR, 17:03, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)