Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomos Roberts
I have given this AfD quite a bit of thought. I agree with Berchanhimez' thorough assessment of the sources. The article fails  on all four criteria. The original article was the most promotional arts-related article I have ever seen. There is an indication that this is a coordinated effort between the article creator and the poet's manager/PR agent therefore I believe, whether or not UPE took place, the intention of the piece was pure  puff. The essay on  and in particular the section on ADVERTISING section #5 are relevant. I also agree the poet does not meet GNG per Berchanhimez. From my own observations when trimming some of the promotional content, I saw that all of this artist's works are from the past year, and based on that, it is way . Perhaps in a few years
— User:Netherzone, 23:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:PROMO||WP:NOT||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)