Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol Povah
without prejudice against recreation of a '''redirect''' afterward — but delete the article first and ''then'' create a redirect if desired, because we have no need to retain the edit history ''behind'' the redirect. None of this is "inherently" notable for the purposes of establishing that he's eligible for a Wikipedia article — but the sourcing consists of one glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article about something else and a letter to the editor which he ''wrote'', which is nowhere close to enough sourcing to get him over 
— User:Bearcat, 22:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)