Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florentin Smarandache (2nd nomination)
This article certainly has a colorful editing history, and some of the comments at the first AfD are laugh-out-loud funny, but I don't see that anything has changed since then to make me think that "keep" result wasn't the right one.  He certainly seems to be notable based on the evidence.  Per , we do generally allow some autobiographical information to be included in biographical articles, and in this case it is appropriately identified as such in the text.  For what it's worth (which may be very little in this case), Google News does turn up a few sources that appear to be "about" himhttp://www.google.com/search?q=Florentin++Smarandache&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=IVeCTYLcCJO6sAP08b2GAg&ved=0CA8QpwUoBQ: they're in Romanian, which I don't know, and they make even less sense to me after being run through the Google translator into English.http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=ro&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.revistanoinu.com%2FDin-perspectiva-limbii-romane-India-Magica.html&act=urlhttp://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=ro&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.revistanoinu.com%2FEl-Smarandacheste-dedicat-Florentin-Smarandache.html&act=urlhttp://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=ro&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.observatorcultural.ro%2FGheorghe-NICULESCU-Florentin-SMARANDACHE%3B-Vreme-de-saga-fabule-parodii-epigrame-catrene-distihuri*articleID_4508-articles_details.html&act=url  That seems to be par for the course with respect to this subject
— User:Arxiloxos, 19:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ABOUTSELF (Wikipedia:Verifiability)