Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daz Dillon
I feel like I need to point out that to qualify for A7 speedy deletion, an article must not make any claim of ''importance'' not ''notability''.  Those are two very different things.  The article makes several claims of importance, such as having received significant coverage from multiple independent and reliable sources which could even be considered a claim of notability per .  Look, as much as the next editor, I don't like when people come to Wikipedia and write promotional articles about themselves and include information that seems to be completely made up but some of you seem a little eager to pull the trigger.  With a speedy, you stand to have the user come back and make an article here or at another location on Wikipedia while we stand to gain literally nothing when compared to an AfD.  The only thing we lose with an AfD is a little bit of time and we gain a discussion that will allow for G4 deletions in the future when the author will most likely return
— User:OlYeller21, 21:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)