Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Weeks
None of the references here represent |reliable source coverage ''about'' him — every last one of them is either a |primary source, or coverage of ''tangential'' topics which with one exception doesn't even contain Weeks' name ''at all''. This is not how you demonstrate a person's notability for the purposes of a Wikipedia article — he has to be the ''subject'' of reliable source coverage, and ''nothing'' that can be said about him hands him an inclusion freebie that ''exempts'' him from that requirement just because it's been stated. And it's not enough to just ''assert'' that other sources exist if you're not ''showing'' them, either — if he's been covered in ''Applied Arts Magazine'' and ''The New York Times'' as EngiZe claims, then why aren't those citations ''present'' in the article
— User:Bearcat, 14:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)