Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Drake (director)
as ''just'' barely notable enough and we do not expect a new fimmaker to have the coverage as might Spielberg or Lucas. Since this young filmmaker is involved in more than one project, it's not quite a . That he and his most recent project ARE receiving coverage,http://www.onyamagazine.com/arts-culture/film/australian-conversation-edward-drake-aspiring-film-maker/http://www.theage.com.au/national/melbourne-life/love-to-have-a-beer-with-reg-after-film-20120216-1tbeg.htmlhttp://www.filmink.com.au/news/movie-extra-webfest-finalists-announced/http://if.com.au/2011/05/16/article/JSWHJPBXFI.htmlhttp://www.horror-movies.ca/2012/02/first-poster-for-australian-zombie-film-animals/http://www.moviehole.net/201252753-young-kewley-gorman-and-zachariah-for-new-australian-zombie-filmhttp://articles.freeadsearch.com/2012/02/production-underway-on-animals-2/http://www.moviehole.net/201252753-young-kewley-gorman-and-zachariah-for-new-australian-zombie-film the concern for ONEEVENT does not quite apply, as it is expected that filmmakers receive coverage for their latest projects, just as has this fellow. With ''just'' enough coverage, we have  and  being met. I have already suggested elsewherehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FAnimals_%28film%29&diff=479792226&oldid=479370764 that the film Animals (film) should be redirected to the filmmaker for the time being, and we can allow this new article to grow and be further improved over time and with regular editing
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 09:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG||WP:FILMMAKER (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)