Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Viewers Television Awards (2nd nomination)
I'm tempted to argue for keeping it, as awards are subject to , not . Not all the coverage is in BizAsia, as various reliable sources listed below dedicate a significant portion of their content to the ATVA. Sure, some include an official website link, but practically all online publications do that nowadays, even if just as a hyperlink hidden in the content. I don't believe that is a damning sign of promotionalism. On another note, considering it is explicitly called a "viewers" award, I think arguing for its deletion on the grounds that it is voted on by viewers seems roundabout. An openly viewer/fan-selected award is not the same as an award that downplays that it can't afford or find reputable judges. And on ''another'' side note, even if the award isn't relevant or notable enough to use help prove notability for biographies being tested for GNG, that doesn't mean it can't exist in its own space as well, also per GNG. The matters are unrelated
— User:MidwestSalamander, 14:04, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)