Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Cameron (lawyer)
People do not get articles just for being candidates in elections they have not won — a person has to ''win'' the election and thereby ''hold'' the office to qualify for a Wikipedia article, not just be a candidate. But this makes absolutely no credible case that he had preexisting notability for other reasons, and the sourcing isn't getting him over  in ''lieu'' of having to pass NPOL either: it's based 2/3 on |primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the only references that are reliable sources are the purely  pieces of campaign coverage that ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election can ''always'' show, not evidence that he's somehow a special case of significantly greater notability than most other unelected candidates. Wikipedia is not a free repository of campaign brochures for aspiring officeholders: we keep articles about people who ''hold'' notable political offices, not everybody who ever ran for one
— User:Bearcat, 14:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)