Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyadarshini Raje Scindia (2nd nomination)
I've had a long think and had a good look round for yet more sources. There is nothing here of substance except minor society sycophancy by people who still labour under the belief that she is royalty (she is not). Her primary notability is as the wife of a politician who happens to have various sinecures in his control, and of course notability is not inherited. Shobhit Gosain's arguments hold no weight in policy because  applies and because their response to Fowler&fowler is nothing but yet another personal attack from them.  Dusti seems not to have spotted that all we have in the article is namechecks and, of course, such things do not confer notability and are common in situations where sycophancy is involved
— User:Sitush, 09:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)