Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raji Arasu
This looks pretty borderline to me. There are many non-independent sources in the article, which don't help in showing notability. The independent ones seem to be ''The Daily Muse'' and ''Forbes''. I can't see the ''Boston Globe'' source, so I don't know how much it has about her. ''Computerworld'' includes her in some articles where IT leaders give advice and opinions - March 2009 and August 2016, and in 2016 included her in 100 Premier Technology Leaders. (I'm not including links as I access them through the National Library of Australia|NLA.)  ''Business Insider'' in 2017 had her as #28 on a list of "43 most powerful female engineers of 2017" https://www.businessinsider.com/most-powerful-female-engineers-of-2017-2017-2?r=AU&IR=T, and in 2014 had her as one of "5 Successful Women In Technology From India" https://www.businessinsider.in/5-successful-women-in-technology-from-india/articleshow/44991200.cms. So that coverage extends from 2009-2017. It's not substantial, but neither is it trivial, and I think it just meets  "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability
— User:RebeccaGreen, 13:22, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)