Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of residential buildings in India (2nd nomination)
no valid or substantive argument for deletion presented, and this easily passes  as index of articles and  as complementary index to :Category:Residential buildings in India. The nominator's argument is nothing more than , a poor argument in general, and one that is especially ridiculous here where this list hasn't had a single edit since it was last kept by my close of the first AFD in December, let alone a problematic one.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_residential_buildings_in_India&type=revision&diff=784300845&oldid=756176690 We don't delete just because something requires "maintenance", and we certainly don't delete where there is not even a record of maintenance (or of ''any'' talk page usage, still true here as it was at the first AFD), but instead just speculation about "drawbacks and potential problems". And not that we need go into any further benefits, but the list also has plenty of room for development, to make it sortable for example, and annotate it
— User:Postdlf, 20:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN||WP:SUSCEPTIBLE (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)