Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taran Rampersad
Room for improvement is not grounds for deletion.  I would note, however, motives of the nomination are less important than establishing .  I think the news coverage qualifies the article.  The fact that it was created by an independent source is a testament to that
— User:TeaDrinker, 03:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)