Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemmersbach
Having read the above discussion and the sources for the article, I think it should be deleted. The sources, in spite of being mainly in reliable publications, are too complimentary of the company to demonstrate clear-cut independent content. This is why I think the company is a / fail. Their mention in an ''FT'' list is good but not significant coverage. Overall, this has the look of a really good PR drive. I would change my mind if several pieces of ''disinterested'' coverage in secondary sources were to surface. With regard to MichaelDubley, his contributions list does nothing to assuage concerns that the account is a 
— User:Modussiccandi, 22:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGCRITE||WP:COMPANY||WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Notability)