Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey to Portugal
It's obvious now the nom is simply cut-and-paisting deletion rationale on a Wikipedia:Overzealous deletion|AfD fishing expedition for non-English topic articles created years ago with zero regard to  and -CONTENT (the latter being policy).  In less than two seconds I found very in-depth coverage from ''The New York Times'' and ''Publishers Weekly''.  https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/01/04/01/reviews/010401.01pyelt.htmlhttps://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-15-100587-1  I'm wondering if the nom even ''read'' the stub.  I should point out that all AfD's generate the page Wikipedia:Introduction to deletion process|Introduction to deletion process which states, "Nominators for deletion should demonstrate a reasonable level of competence. This means '''articles, categories or templates should not be nominated in a routine fashion, nor because one feels too lazy to check for sources''', or if the content is still being built or improved
— User:Oakshade, 03:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)