Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Userbar
the phenomenon is clearly notable, and I think the large quantity of unreliable sources makes it sufficiently verifiable. Searching http://www.google.com/search?q=userbar+tutorial 'userbar tutorial' on Google yields hundreds (thousands?) of tutorials listing pretty much the same specifications &mdash; although nearly all of them are on forums/blogs/etc. I think we should invoke |common sense here, because although these sites would not be |reliable sources individually, there's so many of them stating basically the same thing. There's also the http://www.userbars.be/faq userbars.be FAQ that I've referenced in the article, which can probably be considered a more reliable source
— user:intgr, 10:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COMMON||WP:RS (Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means)