Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Displacement in Philadelphia
This is nowhere near "unsalvageable". It ''is'' a hot mess, badly under-referenced, and with the "External links" section and REF fields inside {{tl|cite}} templates being used as a jury-rigged way to achieve the effect of collecting the references in one place and decluttering the main text—an effect better accomplished with Help:List-defined references|list-defined references and the {{tl|r}} template. It will be a lot of work to fix, but not nearly as much as some of the users favoring deletion seem to think. Many of the links are dead, but can be revived with a little searching. As an experiment, I revived one single dead link, http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/article.php?id=520 Penn Offers Cash Incentive to Increase Home ownership in University City. A Google search on its title revealed https://news.upenn.edu/news/penn-offers-cash-incentive-increase-home-ownership-university-city this live link to the article as the very first hit. With that, I was able to construct a proper reference{{r|Holtzman-1998-03-30}}—which turns out to be a source for many, if not most, of the claims made in the section "University City". Granted, it's a primary source for many of the claims, but that's a different matter from complete lack of sourcing. This article doesn't look like  or an essay to me—it just looks badly referenced. A bit more searching easily turns up secondary references for the topic. For example, this Google search term
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)