Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional genealogy
agree with Jclemens that some indiscriminate claims are nonsense, but this is a textbook case. No third-party sources to  of this concept. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be the first place you cover a topic, even if you can assemble a few things we know exist (like the Sopranos family and the McDucks family). If a reliable source directly covers the whole topic then recreate the article or list. But until then it should remain deleted
— User:Shooterwalker, 15:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:verify notability (Wikipedia:Notability)