Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Informedconsent.co.uk
no evidence from multiple, nontrivial |reliable sources that site meets . As for the keep recommender's assertion ''they don't say a lot about the site, but there's not really a lot to say''... well, then the article does not belong on Wikipedia.  a primary or secondary source of information, it is an encyclopedia, which is a tertiary source. I can understand the assertion that the article was created solely as a last-ditch effort to save Wipipedia; that ship has sailed, so without any evidence as to notability, this one should join as well
— User:Kinu, 04:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:WEB||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)