Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism and response in parapsychology
and merge relevant criticism into main article. It's basically a list of "answers" to strawman arguments, a POV fork which violates #Undue weight and gives the impression that the critcism (which is made up of strawmen to begin with) has been decisively rebutted. Criticism/controversy should be incorporated into the main parapsychology article
— User:Charles, 18:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)