Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massachusetts Library Association
working with the archivist at the organization " - This raises the potential for serious issues of |conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutrality.  Of course a professional working within an organisation is bound to be in a position to know more about the organisation than those outside, but if the only ources|sources are those within the organisation then I doubt they meet the requirements to be reliable and independent.  As for not being tagged - nowhere in the Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion procedures does it state that this is necessary.  The article has been around for two years and at no time during those two years has anybody produced any sources to support the claim that this association is notable.  I don't doubt it exists, I doubt if it is notable
— User:B1atv, 09:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:S (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)