Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Hofschröer
I think you can make a reasonable case that the subject is notable. Certainly his work has been the subject of reviews in reliable sources (e.g. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2004/apr/17/featuresreviews.guardianreview23 and some of Chris Troutman's links above). However it is going to be rather difficult to cover him while remaining compliant with  given his conviction for possessing indecent images of children http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/14612062.Historian_who_had_36_000_indecent_photos___videos_gets_two_and_a_half_years/ and the large number of people trying to insert poorly sourced content claiming there has been a campaign of harassment against him. Given that his notability is somewhat borderline I think think it's worth trying to do this
— User:Hut, 13:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)