Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beit Hanan attack
no secondary sources cited '''at all''' (and newspaper accounts 50 years later are , see for example https://hartness.vsc.edu/find/articles/newspapers/primary-sources/#:~:text=Newspaper%20articles%20can%20be%20examples%20of%20both%20primary%20and%20secondary%20sources.&text=would%20be%20considered%20a%20primary,be%20considered%20a%20secondary%20source. here). Bring some actual secondary sources that discuss this and provide in depth coverage then make an article. As it stands now there are literally 0 sources demonstrating any type of coverage in secondary sources
— [[User talk:Nableezy|nableezy]]''' -, 21:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:No original research)