Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragonlance artifacts
per  and , and I quote NOTPLOT: Articles "should contain more than a recap or summary of the works' contents. Such articles should be expanded". It's easy to expand the article with not-in-universe references to the works and years of publication where each artifact appeared, and NOTPLOT instructs us to do exactly that, which couldn't happen if the article is deleted. The article already contains elements that are not plot, such as the books, movies and video games that included. Expand those, and remove what can't be sourced. Even if that results in a stub,  is a viable alternative and preferred to deleting everything
— User:Diego, 11:50, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTPLOT||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:STUBBING (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)