Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional Scots
a simple, straightforward, and notable topic, and I see no valid or substantive arguments for deletion.  The claims that this violates  as an "unencyclopedic cross-categorization" are contradicted by many of the same commenters, who have stated that an article on fictional Scots generally would be notable and acceptable.  I fail to see how a list of examples of an encyclopedic topic could be unencyclopedic.  Further, some claiming this is a nonencyclopedic cross-categorization have incredibly stated that the same topic would be nevertheless acceptable :Category:Fictional Scottish people|''as a category''.  The only valid concern I see here in any of the deletion comments is that the list may be indiscriminate, but on that I point there has not been any substantive discussion, only the nom's unelaborated opinion.  So I am not convinced that the list is inherently indiscriminate and that no threshold or inclusion criteria could be adopted or maintained
— User:Postdlf, 17:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)