Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alientology
Just because an article refers to itself as a neologism doesn't mean that it warrants deletion as a neologism.  The guidelines on eologism establish this.  Some neologisms (in the sense of the common usage of the word) are notable enough to have articles.  In this case, I do find a New York Times article that references the term Alientology: http://movies.nytimes.com/mem/movies/review.html?res=9504EFD91F39F937A25751C1A964948260.  But I do not think this particular article is notable because I barely find any sources--and the coverage in that source I gave is rather trivial.  I say '''Delete''' but I want to caution users that I do not agree with all the reasoning/arguments presented above.  I agree with the reasoning that there aren't good sources--as many people have pointed out
— User:Cazort, 22:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)