Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Curran (scientist) (2nd nomination)
despite the apparent self-promotion and sockpuppet invasion here and the  and  promotional language on the article, some of which I just https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Curran_%28scientist%29&diff=623917737&oldid=623630048 cleaned out. The h-index doesn't really tell the whole story: 11 isn't a big number for this area but it could mean 11 papers with citation numbers in the teens or (as in this case) four of them with over 100 citations. I think the highly cited research papers, together with the stories about his research in ''Wired'' and the ''New York Times'', are enough. But given the sockpuppetry here and the pattern of promotional edits to the article by anonymous users, some level of protection may be warranted
— User:David, 21:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WIKIPUFFERY||WP:PEACOCK (Wikipedia:Wikipuffery)