Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodbye Marie (2nd nomination)
The nominator complained that there was no policy discussion in the KEEP decision from the first nomination. That's untrue because there was plenty of discussion there about notability for a charting single. Meanwhile, the nominator has said that the article should be deleted because it will permanently be a stub.  states that an article ''could'' be deleted for this reason, but it also states that some stub-class articles can be kept simply because there isn't much else to write about. There is a similar decision to be made at  criterion #2. Those are two judgment calls that might kill a lot of articles, but this song charted and therefore has some notability under  and related guidelines. And by the way, the chart guidelines do not contain the phrase "terribly low-charting" as a criterion for making a decision on notability. If you don't think #17 is high enough, explain why
— User:Doomsdayer520, 14:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOEFFORT||WP:BEFORE||WP:NSONGS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)