Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killings at Coolacrease
Wow, yet another single-purpose account pitching in here.  Ukobserver is not a new editor, so he/she is probably unaware of wikipedia policies, which is why every one of the arguments made by Ukobserver directly opposes wikipedia policies.Firstly, wikipedia's a standard is not truth, it's verifiability (see ). "Setting the record straight" by "discrediting of the RTE programme" is a blatant breach of .  Finally, you may or may or may be right that the RTE programme was a pile of nonsense, but it's not up to you or me use to use |original research to prove or disprove that point; wikipedia is a tertiary source, and it reports the analyses which have already been published in secondary sources
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 14:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)