Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beata Nowok
Per Nom. I am going to have to draw a line "somewhere". I think "Having published work does not, in itself, make an academic notable, no matter how many publications there are.", but when they are on the low side then sub-splitting notability ("That might be low for experimental biomedicine, but for demography its quite enough.") seems to give differing standards. If we are going to go with 2 papers with over 100 citations as a criteria to pass Wikipedia:PROF#C1 (not giving any differentiation between authoring and co-authoring), citing 169, 93, 69 (one is almost there), then this would actually be |"too soon". "If" revisiting NPROF is required, that may or may not give results that "quadruple the number of academic bios", then that is a possible future discussion. As pointed out the current position of the subject and being just a member of something does not give added advancement. I don't have an academic background but if any "pinging" starts, where we are going to discuss a "more inclusive standard", please include me
— User:Otr500, 10:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)