Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Breisacher (2nd nomination)
Four of the eight references here are |primary sources that are not support for notability at all — Political Graveyard is not a notability-assisting source, and neither is the self-published documentation of any organization that's directly affiliated with the claim (such as sourcing his presidency of a local savings and loan to the annual report of the state division of savings and loan associations, rather than any evidence of real media coverage ''about'' his presidency of a savings and loan.) And for media sourcing, what we have is two obituaries, a glancing namecheck of his existence in a list of people, and a local history book: but the book is just being used to footnote the dates of his term in office, not any substantive content that might speak to his potential notability, and having your name appear in a list of appointments to a non-notable job is not a notability clincher, so the only sources that are relevant to establishing whether he's notable enough or not are the obituaries themselves. But one of them is the paid-inclusion obituary in the classifieds section of the town where he grew up, not a journalist-written news article, so it doesn't help at all — and while the other one is in ''The New York Times'', the fact that a person has an obituary in ''The New York Times'' still doesn't single-handedly clinch his notability all by itself: even just to claim that he passed GNG, he would still need to have a lot ''more'' than just ''one'' non-primary and non-trivial source
— User:Bearcat, 17:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)