Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian federal election campaign, 2010
and if required, |be bold and '''merge''' the content to appropriate sections in Australian federal election, 2010.  Forgive me for being blunt, but the majority of the arguments proffered by those WP:!vote|!voting delete are almost identical to the examples given in |Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions.  In particular, I would point out that |this is a wiki, and |we don't delete articles simply because they're rubbish, we |fix them.  Furthermore, I completely disagree that the article as it stands is wholly unsalvageable: it's structure and |weight need quite a bit of work, but most of it is reasonably well referenced, and the individual sections are certainly not so terrible that the encyclopedia would be better off upon their complete removal.&nbsp
— User:Lear, 11:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BOLD||WP:PROBLEM||WP:FINISHED||WP:RUBBISH||WP:SOFIXIT||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Be bold)