Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen Hambro
a previous PROD rationale claimed "appointments of this civil servant mentioned in official Norwegian sources, but no secondary sources and insufficient notability", but this is wrong, wrong and wrong. 1) The sources are not official by any means, they are independent/|RS. 2) Two secondary sources already in the article, one of which is a paper encyclopedia. 3) This adds up to sufficient notability. Notability should be intuitive anyway. 4) By the way the article was prodded by a new user and afd'd by an anon - who in the world has a grudge against Ellen Hambro
— User:Punkmorten, 22:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)