Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video games notable for negative reception (2nd nomination)
1. Not indiscriminate. This list is not indiscriminate, in the sense that not everything could be on there: it has to have a sourced statement that the game is notable for negative reception. Sources like http://www.gametrailers.com/player/16066.html the most disappointing games are used, and are adequate. 2. The argument of the nominator rests on a single point: ''"all of this information can be covered on their respective articles"''. This point is blatantly false and goes against the reason to have lists like List of Chinese philosophers, List of topics in philosophy of mind and Films considered the greatest ever at all. I suggest the nominator gives ists a good read. I also suggest the nominator withdraws because the debate is unlikely to have a different conclusion than the last one, but this really is just a suggestion, unlike the rest of this argumentation, which has a pressing and generally not nice tone
— User:Krator, 20:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:L (Wikipedia:Lists)