Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messed Up (2nd nomination)
Fundamentally, the question here is whether there's a second reliable source (as ''Die Tageszeitung'' is unquestionably the first). I think that answer is probably yes. ''Cafébabel'' is a distinctly weird publication, based on the concept of participatory journalism; however, it doesn't appear to be "user-generated content" in the way that normally excludes sites from satisfying . It has a stated editorial policy, and includes editorial oversight both in terms of article topic selection and traditional prose editing; additionally, it is published by a recognized nonprofit that partners with Europe for Citizens. We've certainly accepted far more marginal sources as reliable elsewhere. And there's no question that the article in question offers a significant treatment of the subject. Now, some of the other sources? Probably not as good. But that's not a deletion rationale
— User:Squeamish, 15:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)