Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Island (documentary)
Yes.. reversing myself.  While the issue of possible notability for an academic film paralells the same issues of notability for an academic text, it seems that that greater issue might end up be resolved elsewhere.  My concern herein is that the allegdedly paid SPA resorted to blatent |copyvio in creating the article.  While yes, I tried to address it with my later edits, I do not feel inclined to support such actions.  Look at how it appeared when first nominated,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bloody_Island_%28documentary%29&action=historysubmit&diff=405505091&oldid=405503413 and compare the text to the text at Filmmakers.com,http://www.filmakers.com/index.php?a=filmDetail&filmID=857 and you'll see the word-for-word copyvio in the plot section and the reception section.  Yes, I try to save what I can... and a stub might actually be workable if later determined notable to academia... but copyvio is a serious violation of policy and an affront to Wikipedia. This one can go
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 03:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COPYVIO (Wikipedia:Copyright violations)