Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Proctor
The article itself could be speedied as ridiculously and over-the-top promotional, but let's put this one to rest. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=author%3A%22PH+Proctor%22&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33 Searching under Gscholar for "PH Proctor" as the author finds an h-index of 14, which is too low for #C1 in the ''extremely'' high citation fields of medical research. I see no other claim to notability under . The references in this article, especially as a ton of them are primary, are a classic case of TLDR, but a gnews search, as well as the work by earlier editors on the page, find nothing to pass 's requirement for significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject. The closing admin may indeed wish to consider '''salting''' the article due to the history with sockpuppetry
— User:RayAYang, 01:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)