Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Franzi
They have been interviewed in Forbes, but that alone is not enough. Otherwise I see mainly mentions or, as {{noping|Philafrenzy}} mentioned, self-published (or, at least, non-secondary) sources. Article in its current state also reads like a C.V. Overall, I just don't see enough for it to pass |GNG at this time. If someone comes up with new information that I didn't find/see, which presents a good case as to why the article should be kept, I am more than willing to reconsider my !vote/position, just {{tl|ping}} me
— User:TheSandDoctor, 02:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)