Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herman Rockefeller
None of the above ''keeps'' provide reasons in accordance with WP policy, as per  or .  With regard to the notability of victims, the policy states ''"A victim of a high-profile crime does not automatically qualify as being notable enough to have a stand-alone article solely based on his or her status as a victim. Notability with regards to this is normally defined as satisfying some other aspect of the notability of persons guideline..."'' So, we have to look at the notability of the crime itself or of Mr Rockefeller's life before  the crime.  If it's the crime that's notable, that should perhaps be the subject of the article, not the victim.  Before the crime, Mr Rockefeller was a very ordinary and, according to his family's own press statement, a very private person.  15 news articles in 20 years - most just quoting him as a company spokesperson certainly doesn't make him notable.  With regard to the crime as an example of psychoeconomics, if that is indeed the case, I would recommend a merge with Psychoeconomics.  I feel that this deletion must be argued in accordance with policy, otherwise we have a case of Wikipedia becoming a newspaper, in breach of . —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Wikipeterproject, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:VICTIM||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Notability)