Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang sicong
OK, I have gone through and reviewed all the sources that have been added to the article. There's a lot so I will leave my comments under the hat below. In general I will note that nearly all of them refer to him or qualify him as the son of China's richest man. This is a clear indicator to me that he is not notable in his own right. As I said in my nomination, most of the coverage is trivial. If we only use the information in these sources, the majority of the article will be about a rich guy with lots of follows on the internet who likes to waste money on his dog and likes women with large chests. I am not seeing the significant in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources needed to meet  or to avoid a BLP full of trivia and  material
— User:Sarahj2107, 20:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Notability)