Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward-looking statement
With limited attention to the VfD process for this page, I'm left to make further comment in the hollow. I've noticed the related  subjects and concluded the nom was an experiment of Durova's. In contrast, I've also noticed other articles that haven't been so quickly put up on AfD, like Functional shift which has barely any content. It receives only http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Functional+shift%22&btnG=Search 13k hits on google. While that is easier to wade through and find verifable content, there are many hits that express a different definition than given. There is also the Shatt language that barely has any impression, which google reports only http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=shatt+&btnG=Search 160k hits just for "shatt." Nevertheless, just "forward-looking" alone comes up with more than http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22forward-looking%22&btnG=Search 17 million hits.  &mdash
— User:Dzonatas, 06:10, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)