Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual personal names (4th nomination)
I would argue that the discussion has concatenated two discrete questions, the first question being "Should this article itself be in Wikipedia?" (the point of contention in this AfD), and a second question, "Will the article's content be completely unmanageable?". I wholeheartedly agree that the '''content''' of the article will always have ongoing , ,  and more problems.  As
— User:Stifle, 13:51, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:No original research)