Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid
and '''a note for the closing admin'''. A few days ago, I closed as a deletion the discussion for a related article, Allegations of American apartheid. The article overlapped with sections of existing articles, and the notability of the subject was questionable. The same problems affect this article. Like the American article, this article consists of a series of quotes strung together to create a theme. However, it does not cite anything to indicate that ''the theme itself'' - the subject of the article - is notable or has been the subject of significant discussion. You could just as easily retitle it List of people who have compared Chinese government policies to apartheid. It plainly fails , specifically . Concerning the arguments that have been made in this discussion, I would advise the closing admin to look carefully at Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions; many of the arguments are of the ,  and  variety. In closing the American article AfD, I took the decision to discount such arguments as being irrelevant side issues, and I would advise the closing admin to do the same (AfD is not a vote count; policy trumps (lack of) consensus). The closing admin may also be interested to look at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 30, where a substantial number of uninvolved admins endorsed the deletion and left comments of direct relevance to this discussion
— User:ChrisO, 22:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:ALLORNOTHING||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:No original research)