Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moynihan’s law
JJL, you said "A surprising number of them do reference Wikipedia but the chicken-and-egg issue now seems irrelevant."  Why do you consider the issue irrelevant?  A source which cites Wikipedia to support its assertion is unreliable, and unreliable sources cannot be used to prove that Moynihan’s law is established (please see ), and I agree with Crotalus's assessments regarding the other sources that have been cited.  I have not found multiple, reliable, independent and secondary sources to suggest that Moynihan’s law is not a neologism, and thus I believe the article should be deleted
— User:JEdgarFreeman, 03:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)