Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bloody Day in Jaffa
A number of  refer to the Bloody Day in Jaffa, including The Nation on its June 3 1936 issue.  Entire Wikipedia articles have been written on less (and this one is additionally backed by references to 2 books and at least 2 scholarly journals).  I see nothing wrong with this article, which, being young, will probably be developed in future, but since when is Wikipedia in the business of deleting young articles before a chance is given to develop them?  Now, some people say "merge," but then, once merged, others may fairly complain that this one event's section on a long series of events is oversize respect to the entirety of the 1936-39 Arab revolt article, and then, well, we'd be back to square one.  Kingsidian's comments and Zero's are nothing but ad hominem's on EMG's; they seem to not like the Wikipedia articles EMG apparently chooses to edit (his "stock in trade", they say).  I say, judge this Bloody Day article by its merits, and not by EMG's other articles. Cheerio
— User:XavierItzm, 01:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)