Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis St. Lewis
Modernist expresses my view on this exactly. Also, the IP states that the artist falls between print and the internet. They're referring to the difficulty of finding references, but I think it also applies to the artist's notability: enough for some mentions in the local press, but not enough for the kind of mainstream newspapers and specialist art magazines that have a large presence on the internet. Notability isn't decided by Google, but since a 47 year old artist can't really be described as pre-internet the lack of online sources is a real problem. Especially because we're talking about someone who's claim to notability is slight to begin with. Reluctant delete as having a minor claim to notability per , but one that can't be verified with reliable third-party sources
— User:Ethicoaestheticist, 18:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE (Wikipedia:Notability)