Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maja Einstein (3rd nomination)
I questioned the wording in this template on the help desk not too long ago, but I didn't get too many replies. From where I'm standing it amounts to Wikipedia:Immediatism and a bit of deletionism combined. Also, it goes directly against  that specifically tells us not to delete something fixable even if it is not being fixed,  and  apply too. The best way to handle this is to contact regulars on the Albert Einstein article personally. Regardless, I think nominating it now under the template's current wording. (How prompt is prompt? There doesn't seem to be a consensus on that, and based on the current view on grace periods for unreferenced articles with regard to deletion  (talk) I don't think a consensus  is likely to develop. When did this phrase manage to creep(sp?) in
— User:MacGyverMagic, 00:00, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AFD||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:DEADLINE||WP:IRE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)