Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Fluke
as a textbook case of . The event in question is her non-testimony before  the congressional committee. Everything else is just media flap and fall out from that; this coverage looks broad enough to warrant mention at some article, but we hold |biographies of living persons to a higher standard. I think a more instructive search than those described above is to use the date delimiting option. This returns a number of results, but they all relate to: (1) Fluke's activities as a law student (useful if we were reviewing a grant application, but they do not establish notability); or (2) older articles with newer material appended (a flaw in the limiter algorithm). In my uninformed layperson's opinion, I think that there is a good chance that she intends to become a public figure at some later point, but for now we do not have the sourcing necessary to construct an article with any depth about the person that is not just a coatrack for an article about the event (with apologies to the people who worked on the article, as it is pretty decently written and covers all the major points I could find
— User:FiveColourMap, 05:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)