Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Beesley (3rd nomination)
although '''CONTRA nom'''. It is irrelevant whether someone herself wants the article to be deleted, stronger, that is more a reason to keep it, because articles should be judged on the merits, not preferences. HAving sai that, the merits are listed in , and she is clearly not notable enough in the real world to warrant an article at wikipedia. Being part or having been part of wikipedia by itself is NOT sufficient reason to have an article, they should be treated in the same way as we would do with other articles. My conclusion, delete as NN
— User:KimvdLinde, 13:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)