Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Ammori
Basically, for the reasons already stated, that this is clearly a self-promotional entry.  Also, I cannot agree that this entry passes under #C7 while so utterly failing #C1. Let's return to the criteria in #C7: "The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." Can we really truly say that a person who is cited in *literally* a handful of stories meets the criteria of "substantial impact outside academia"? I think not. Also, it should be pointed out, that the articles cited by Ray were very old-- the WaPO story is 2010, and Mercury News piece is 2008, and the PhilInq story is 2009. Thus, the subject fails the "frequently quoted" requirement. This isn't a case of an academic working in a "local media" environment. The subject claims expertise in national/federal regulatory policy. IMHO, this article fails #C1, #C7, and thus Wikipedia:BIO|WP:BIO and Wikipedia:Notability|WP:Notability
— User:Category, 05:11, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)