Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony J. Hilder (2nd nomination)
I'm seeing a lot of mentions in book, just a few here https://books.google.com/books?id=uAsKAQAAMAAJ&dq=tony+hilder&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=hilderhttps://books.google.com/books?id=_lEUAQAAIAAJ&q=tony+hilderhttps://books.google.com/books?id=GeXBzJBJe1wC&pg=PA210#v=onepage&q&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=0Lte8pweTa0C&pg=PA514. Most of them however appear to be just passing mentions. I'm assuming Karl Twist is claiming notability based on  #7, which he should clearly state to be so if true. He should however recognize that Discogs is not consider a reliable site per , and should avoid filling the article with references that don't contribute to notability, in fact obscuring what might be the useful ones. I'm leaning towards keep, but the article needs tidying up
— User:Hzh, 15:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:MUSICBIO||WP:RSP (Wikipedia:Notability)