Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circumcision fetish (second nomination)
The reason this one should be deleted is that, since there are no verifiable sources, as near as we can tell it is simply made up; note that one of the sources in the article is actually a letter by a wikipedia editor.  This, it seems to me, egregiously violates the |no original research guideline
— User:Nandesuka, 13:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)