Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camel toe (2nd nomination)
Decide whether to substitute with a soft redirect to the Wiktionary entry by ordinary talk page discussion.  If there's a point to be made here, that point is that there is ''no need'' for an administrator to delete the page history of this article - apart from a lack of information, there's nothing to object to.  To the contrary, if that is done, it means that the original contributors who created the stuff I moved over to Wiktionary will no longer be properly credited.  Also, there are some bits and pieces of content which, while rather obvious, I didn't manage to stuff into the Wiktionary article as quotes.  Someone with experience in that project might be able to scrounge up something else to transfer over.  I started a discussion along this line at 's talk page, though it didn't sound like I was getting enough support last I looked - nonetheless, I feel my logic is right, especially for this example
— User:Wnt, 02:10, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)