Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of controversial celebrity baby names
Should I say "self-explanatory" too?  No, I will actually explain my position by reference to |policy: "''The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion''".  And not only does the nomination not bother to explain itself, it seems quite clear that no consideration has been given to .   The naming of babies is quite a big deal in the real world and so the topic clearly passes  as there are numerous examples of relevant coverage including
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SK||WP:BEFORE||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)