Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical trials with surprising outcomes
for the same reasons discussed in great detail at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in mathematics and other related discussions.  In particular, accusations of "original research" regarding this page are spurious.  Editorial decisions regarding the inclusion of content are fundamental to Wikipedia.  The act of reading sources and choosing material to include in Wikipedia is not OR according to the policies here.  Just read : ''Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia'' and so on.  It seems clear that the content of this page is supported by sources.  I agree that the name of the page isn't ideal, but I don't have enough subject-specific knowledge to propose a good alternative
— User:Jowa, 22:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)