Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Muhammad Vastanvi
By #6, the vice-chancellor of a major academic institution is automatically notable - so dismissal from such a post can hardly count as . And the Darul Uloom Deoband, as the leading seminary of one of the major movements in contemporary Islam, is certainly at least a major teaching institution and, at the very least, an argument needs to be made as to why #6 should not apply in this case. Even if it does not apply, the post also seems to have some religious standing and, while we seem to have no explicit specific notability guidelines for religious officials, there does seem to be agreement on a strong presumption of notability for holders of certain Christian religious posts, and we might at least want to guard against |systemic bias by considering whether this post would be comparable
— User:PWilkinson, 18:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BLP1E||WP:PROF||WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Notability)