Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Sophistic
based on the nominators own assessment: “…a synthesis thereof based on existing sources “shows that it is not |Original Research but rather a combination of separate elements to form a coherent whole as shown by a quick Google Scholar search, as shown here: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Second+Sophistic%22&hl=en&lr=.  A well researched – written article, that has been around since 2004.  Why bring to |AFD now?  Thanks
— User:Shoessss, 18:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:AFD (Wikipedia:No original research)