Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist genocide
and expand. I have a feeling that those supporting deletion have not even bothered to do a simple Google Scholar search. The term "Communist genocide" has been in use for more than fifty years, so how can it be neologism? There are several monographs and dozens of scientific articles dealing with the communist genocide, quite a few dedicated to the topic. It is a term used even within last ten days by newspapers http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/On-Vietnam-Cronkite-told-it-the-way-it-wasnt-51751487.html. Several countries have laws dealing with communist genocide. So claiming that it didn't happen, isn't notable or the term doesn't exist is quite frankly, ridiculous and laughable. If the article is POV in your opinion, add opposing viewpoints - but that does not make article suitable for deletion, Wikipedia isn't censored. All other given reasons for deletion come down to 
— User:Sander_S, 06:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)