Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MobileIron
Promotional tone is not a reason to delete. There is very good evidence of notability in a good number of the 11 refs in the article. I consider the following |reliable sources: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2010/08/02/daily24.html, http://connectedplanetonline.com/mobile-apps/news/mobileiron-openet-mobile-data-costs-0805/, http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/090910-new-version-of-mobile-management.html, http://paidcontent.org/2010/08/03/419-mobileiron-raises-16-million-to-manage-smartphones-in-the-enterprise/, http://connectedplanetonline.com/mobile-apps/news/mogileiron-enterprise-app-store-1209/, http://www.enterprisemobiletoday.com/features/management/article.php/3902581/MobileIron-30-Enhances-MultiOS-Smartphone-Management-Software.htm, http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/wireless/2010/040510wireless2.html, http://www.crn.com/blogs-op-ed/mobility/219100646/mobileiron-takes-smartphone-management-to-the-cloud.htm, http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/print-edition/2011/06/03/mobileiron-software-draws-line-work-home.html. Press releases are not reliable sources but if a respected publication is willing to parrot a press release and a reporter puts their name on it, I consider it reliable. What's your criteria {{user|DGG
— [[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]], 00:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)