Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 1600 (3rd nomination)
Consider me slapped. :) Alright, so I'm obviously wrong on the "PC remote is unique" argument.  However, I think my other arguments are still valid.  I think Wikipedia:Other stuff exists|there is other stuff like this, so we should keep this one, too, is not a valid argument, and I would probably vote "merge and redirect" for the Blackberry client phones you linked to, as well.  As for "it was already kept twice", see onsensus#Consensus Can Change.  Especially since, as Wikipedia matures, and our number of articles grows, arguments for inclusion have been undergoing much more rigorous scrutiny than before.  I think the other "redirect" votes above are evidence that, for some of us at least, the previous consensus is no longer valid.  Also, I would point out that the result of the first discussion was in fact '''no consensus''', which ''defaults'' to keep.  I would point you to , as well.  As for searching for gadgets on google, google WILL still give the redirect as a search result, and since I am urging that we keep all the Nokia 1600 ''info'' in the Nokia products article, it is not as if we are therefore preventing users from finding information about the phone
— User:Aervanath, 20:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:C||WP:PRODUCT (Wikipedia:Copyrights)