Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish invasion of Czech Republic
This event is extraordinary, in the literal sense that it is extremely unusual. The delayed response is particularly striking —&nbsp;in a world of instant communication, it took them two weeks to withdraw the troops. That's an argument based on , but I think the invocation of  here is essentially a  argument. o choose one example from above, "if we cover every newspaper news pumped up to get readers" is suggesting that the story is inherently inconsequential, and therefore doesn't meet notability standards. When have we, in human history, treated sending troops into foreign countries and holding (a small piece of) foreign territory for two weeks as an inconsequential event? I am arguing that the very fact that we're treating it as a joke is itself indicative of changes in the last century of European law and practice, and I'm sorry, but that is actually (wp:)interesting. As far as notability standards go, this event has been described as an "invasion" by many reliable sources, including BBC News, NPR and Politico, and that coverage happened two weeks after the original event
— User:Toughpigs, 14:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:INTERESTING||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTINTERESTING (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)