Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha (4th nomination)
The sources provided by Uncle G and Raitchison seem to me to be reasonable coverage. Yes, the article may be over-detailed with unsourced stuff at the moment and could use some rewriting; but I'm pretty confident that this wiki is notable enough to satisfy  on the back of the books and reviews provided. Additionally, JulesH's point about the difficulty of finding reliable sources amongst the huge amounts of other stuff is an argument in itself: even if one argues that this doesn't technically satisfy the wording of the notability ''guideline'', this is clearly ''the'' primary source of canon Star Trek information on the internet and is very widely used. It certainly feels, to me, to be notable as per the spirit of the guideline
— User:Mazca, 17:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)