Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patharkandi railway station
ping|Oakshade|Thryduulf|Necrothesp}} Per , I thoroughly checked  before nominating. Despite what Oakshade asserted above, under |Rail transport, it says that Subway and railway ''lines'' (not stations) often survive AfD and to see the essay at Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations). That latter page then says that for ''stations'' you should either follow  or you should keep the article if enough verifiable information is available for a comprehensive article (which is not the case here). That page goes on to say "If some source material is available, but is insufficient for a comprehensive article, it is better to mention the subject under the article for its parent locality or parent company. If no source material, or only directory-type information (location, function, name, address) can be provided, the subject may not merit mention at all." Since only directory-type information was available, I thought I was erring on the side of inclusionism by proposing a redirect. If the decade-long consensus is that every little concrete slab next to a set of train tracks deserves an article, it should really be listed in  and/or 
— User:Ahecht, 14:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:RAILOUTCOMES||WP:GNG||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:GEOFEAT (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)