Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TruthRevolt
clearly meets . As well as The Daily Beast, the article cites the Washington Examiner, which is a respectable RS. Also, ''The Hollywood Reporter'' did a good piece on the source.https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/media-matters-gets-some-right-644390 These other sources (https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2013/10/07/meet-the-right-wing-leaders-of-truthrevolt/196320 1,https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/3/lena-dunham-disputes-abuse-allegations/ 2,https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/10/16/truth-revolt-media-matters-sharpton-limbaugh-column/2997567/ 3) may not ''necessarily'' be RS, but they show that this article is notable enough to keep. Right now, it may be puffed up, but it can and should be cleaned up per 
— User:Desmay, 16:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RUBBISH (Wikipedia:Notability)