Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of eruvin (3rd nomination)
per , all that is required is "if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources." Also per : "one of the functions of many lists on Wikipedia is providing an avenue for the retention of encyclopedic information that does not warrant separate articles." It has been discussed as a group in numerous places, including these books: https://books.google.ca/books?id=HrFzsP_AbtUC&pg=PA67&dq=eruv+cities+north+america&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAmoVChMIztC_hc_0yAIVQ5UeCh0PMwMg#v=onepage&q=eruv%20cities%20north%20america&f=false, https://books.google.ca/books?id=UUmvqyWtY1IC&pg=PA56&dq=eruv+in+cities&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAWoVChMIy76M0c_0yAIVBSgeCh3f0Abu#v=onepage&q=eruv%20in%20cities&f=false, https://books.google.ca/books?id=IBHx1n3rDe4C&pg=PA3&dq=eruv+cities&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=eruv%20cities&f=false and so on. Also the list is clearly useful to readers, and isn't indiscriminate
— User:FuriouslySerene, 16:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTESAL||WP:CSC (Wikipedia:Notability)