Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Gunter
The one item in Lancet (in a very informally written technology column) does not satisfy , which requires significant coverage by MULTIPLE independent sources. (And I can't believe that people are seriously arguing for her notability based on the fact that she uses Twitter a lot!) Nothing else of significance appears in the citations at the article, or in a search of http://www.google.com/#q=%22jen+gunter%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=sHmhTrLjN6WQiQKU27Vx&sqi=2&ved=0CA4QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=9d81edfce7194ae7&biw=1044&bih=660 Google News. Her citations at http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jen+gunter&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=on Google Scholar are a little more impressive but IMO not enough to meet 
— User:MelanieN, 13:56, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)