Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajeel Shahid
Most coverage is in fact not in-depth, but mostly trivial and passing. The best example of in-depth coverage is http://menmedia.co.uk/asiannews/news/s/480163_main_goal__the_islamic_revolution_in_pakistan this; I wouldn't go so far as to include http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_15-7-2002_pg7_12 microscopic, context-free coverage as substantially about the subject because it's not substantial coverage period. Even aggregating the trivial mentions,  is not met. Furthermore, trivial, non-noteworthy mentions are used to support the majority of the prose, which to me indicates a rather clear  problem: if it's noteworthy, it'll have rather more substantial coverage
— User:JFHJr, 19:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)