Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicaragua–Switzerland relations
no actual rationale for deletion has been provided, and the article clearly fulfills multiple encyclopedic functions. In addition, to respond to this boilerplate nom in the spirit in which it was posted, I will once again note that this nom, like many others on AfD, is based on a fundamental misreading of , which states the conditions under which notability (i.e. appropriateness as an article topic) is ''presumed''.  To claim that a "failure" to meet the GNG means that ''non-notability'' is presumed is to flip the guideline on its head.  The GNG does not provide grounds for deletion. In particular, in this case, such an article makes sense (i.e. the topic is "|notable", whether or not a handful of AfD habitués deem it "significant") because it makes far more sense to assign encyclopedic information about Nicaragua-Switzerland relations to a single article than to duplicate it in separate Nicaragua and Switzerland articles
— User:Visviva, 06:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)