Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DKP
this AfD seems to be getting hit with a lot of IP users and accounts with very few edits.  That's not a grounds for discounting !votes but I would like to point out that by their own admission, the article is unsourced and likely to remain unsourced due to the fact that this information is not to be found anywhere.  While I agree that it is a valuable source of information, that is the very definition of .  Wikipedia cannot be a primary source of information!  I'm not keen on destroying information, and I wouldn't be opposed to userfying this somewhere until a more appropriate permanent home can be found for it.  Wikipedia is not that place.  No one has addressed the issue of lack of verifiability, lack of attribution, original research, and so on.  All the arguments hinge on  without addressing concerns regarding policies and guidelines
— User:Arkyan, 18:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:USEFUL (Wikipedia:No original research)