Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Françoise Moréchand
I asked about this article at :WT:JAPAN#Françoise Moréchand and :WT:WOMEN#Françoise Moréchand prior to it being AfD'd. I felt that the article had some significant issues, particularly with respect to content recently added by a recent good-faith edit spurt by {{u|Ukunsumo}} and added some maintainence templates to reflect these concerns. I didn't dig deep enough, however, to notice the copyvios which were subsequently revdeleted. My original assessment is that Moréchand is probably notable per ,  and , but finding sources to support a claim of notability may be a bit difficult for the reasons given by {{u|Dekimasu}} above.{{pb}}I also feel that while there's nothing wrong trying to improve an article being discussed at AfD in good-faith, it seems recent edits by Ukunsumo re-adding of unsourced content and various :MOS:MOS errors is not really helping things out and actually moving the article in the wrong direction. Creating more things to clean up and may actually make it easier for others to see deletion as the only real alternative here. In my opinion, we should be doing the opposite and trimming out as much unsourced content as possible and cleaning up the layout/formatting as best as we can to make the article at least seem viable as a stub. Content can always be added (re-added) when reliable sources are found which can be cited in support. I am well aware of  and ; so, I'm not suggesting that making things all nice and pretty will be sufficient for keeping the article. At the same time, there's also no need to make the article worse (even if done unintentionally and in good faith
— User:Marchjuly, 04:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: :WP:BIO||:WP:NTEMP||:WP:NEXIST||:WP:ARTN||:WP:OVERCOME (Wikipedia:Notability)