Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell in entertainment and other popular culture
per #DIR #1. I know that ''indiscriminate'' has become a nasty word in certain quarters, but this list and similar ones are truly indiscriminate by design, in that there is nothing in the context provided that would allow one to retain notable and relevant entries while rejecting nonnotable and irrelevant ones—all that's required is that the reference be to "something in popular culture" and that hell be alluded to, however obscurely. In this article, moreover, the unsourceable subjectivity begins in the first entry ("the most imaginative and famous depiction of hell") and recurs throughout. Everyone's always saying that these topics can be turned into acceptable articles; but I've seldom seen that happen, and I see no reason for unacceptable ones to be preserved while we wait. If there's an encyclopedic topic here, let someone create an article on it afresh
— User:Deor, 01:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)