Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Ferrazzi
Any time on the NY Times list is significant, but primarily because at elast three of the cources already cited in the article seem in more than sufficient depth to pass the . And the find soures search reveals several others, blus at least some book sources. I don't relaly belive that a  search was done here, or else everythign was jsut dismissed because marketing is this person's field, so "its all just marketing". Well there can be notable marketers, and here is one
— User:DESiegel, 02:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)