Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long face syndrome
It's not a good article; it's certainly not , and it's a shame the NOM hadn't taken the trouble to spend a few minutes on Google. (Do please read ). There are serious sources going back to 1976 which clearly refer to it as a genuine syndrome, so I believe it meets . See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1067758 here and also http://medcraveonline.com/JDHODT/JDHODT-02-00071.pdf this literature review. I will add them have added them  to the article, and have reworded its contents
— User:Nick, 01:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:BEFORE||WP:N (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)