Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles
As is clear from the policy wording pasted above, making descriptive claims about primary sources is not |original research. Saying that this is |unencyclopedic is a matter of opinion not supported by policy, and to those who find this "disgusting", sorry but #CENSORED|Wikipedia is not censored. Finally, Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes explains why the possibility of a category does not preclude the validity of a list
— User:DHowell, 04:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:UNENCYC||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:No original research)