Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Nehlen (3rd nomination)
nbsp; A check on Google news shows that the top three links are 3 hours old, 7 hours old, and 7 hours old.&nbsp; I also checked on Google books, and see that the topic has coverage there.&nbsp; {{pb}}The last (second) "AfD" was a classic case of a non-deletion content discussion that spiraled out of control into a delete.&nbsp; Considering that the nominator was not a delete !vote and one commentor advocated keeping, seven editors !voted delete, while seven advocated to not delete.&nbsp; Three of the deletes there cited BLP1E, which is totally inapplicable as BLP1E only applies to low-profile individuals, and even when applicable is a merge argument.&nbsp; The third !vote asserts, "Multiple non-notable acts do not add to notability."...This is not helpful, since ''coverage'' of "acts" accumulates.&nbsp; The fifth delete !vote claims that the "keep" !votes haven't done enough to satisfy him/her, even though this was a non-deletion discussion.{{pb}}The eletion guidelines for administrators#Deciding whether to delete#4 states in bold, '''When in doubt, don't delete'''.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 01:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:D (Wikipedia:Disambiguation)