Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of English Defence League demonstrations
I was going to type almost exactly what Diego did. Those delete !votes arguing "indiscriminate" seem to understand "indiscriminate" to mean something like "random", "unusual", "just any old information" rather than the ''technical'' definition it has on WP. The article clearly is not indiscriminate in the WP sense - not just because there are clear inclusion criteria as Diego points out, but I would also argue since the number of EDL demonstrations is finite and each individual demonstration is well-documented in reliable sources, a comprehensive, objective and discriminate list is possible. A good way of understanding  as it applies to this article - ''if there had been only five demonstrations in the history of the EDL, would a cut-down version of this list have belonged in their article''? The answer is clearly "yes". This (a) confirms that ''the content of this article is encyclopedic'' (even if the topic title might not seem it at first glance), (b) completely addresses the "individual protests were not notable" argument. Individual protests may not be ''article-worthy'' but Diego explained why this does not contradict ; moreover this thought experiment confirms that ''somewhere in Wikipedia there should be overview-level coverage of the history of EDL demonstrations''. It doesn't need to be at article-level granularity for each demonstration, but it should be here somewhere, and while the logical place would be in the EDL article  applies for length reasons
— User:TheGrappler, 11:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPLIT||WP:LIST||WP:SPLIT (Wikipedia:Splitting)