Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Television series considered the greatest ever (2nd nomination)
WP:OR/. Yes, the opinions can be sourced to critics, polls, etc, but who decides which sources are significant enough to count? Two examples from the list; TIME magazine's "best television show of the 20th Century" is obviously significant, but Channel 9's 50 Years/50 Shows special in Australia is nowhere near as significant. Where do we draw the line at what sources to rely on, and which to discount? Just because a source passes  doesn't mean their opinions should be used to create a list like this
— User:Masaruemoto, 23:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)