Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Bachelder
as an obvious vanity piece for the promotion of the BLP subject. It's little more than a CV - like a social media entry - and doesn't even include any traditional bio information. It is a vehicle for spam for her companies. See  and . That makes it a clear G11 and just a plethora of sources never alone adds up to notability anyway. Whether or not it applies here, and whether or not the article passes notability and/or MoS standards, the article also has all the hallmarks of having been written by the subject's employee, PR agency, or an otherwise regular Wikipedia editor plying their wares.  A practice which is not only a COI, but a conflict with policy
— User:Kudpung, 04:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DCOI||WP:COINOTBIAS (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)