Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Lynch (2nd nomination)
An editor's writing proficiency has absolutely ''nothing'' to do with notability. How is |GNG at all met by an article almost entirely (aside from a self-published book) composed of |primary documents? Those documents, by the way, are mainly 2-3 line blurbs. Perhaps because the article's creator is highly respected or because the subjects are women some editors are willing to give a free pass, but you are doing no one--women or Wikipedia-- any favors by ignoring inclusion guidelines you would apply anywhere else. GNG is ''not met'', we |are not the news (even old news!), and |original research--no matter how well done--is still just that
— User:TheGracefulSlick, 06:43, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)