Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algebraic Geometry (journal)
From everything I can find, this seems like a legitimate publication, but perhaps |too new to really merit an article. Typically, I would suggest redirecting to the publisher and carrying over the AMS and Zentralblatt citations to provide sources for basic facts. In this case, however, Foundation Compositio Mathematica redirects to the article on their primary publication, ''Compositio Mathematica.'' My current feeling is that Foundation Compositio Mathematica should be an actual article that summarizes https://compositio.nl/#foundation the activities of the foundation, and both ''Compositio Mathematica'' and ''Algebraic Geometry (journal)|Algebraic Geometry'' should be sections of that article. To me, this seems to strike the right balance between |preserving uncontroversial content about legitimate mathematics publishing (thereby being useful to the mathematical community) and giving undue weight to efforts that have just recently gotten going
— User:XOR, 17:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Too soon)