Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARS Public School
Upon reading through the closure of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&oldid=767023947#RfC_on_secondary_school_notability the February RFCI have found that the closure is confusing and inconclusive, ''but'' from my understanding the result was 'no consensus, defaulting to status quo'. BTW, {{tq|Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist}} was the status quo back then; existence has to be verified by a reliable secondary source independent of the subject. I believe though, that the correct interpretation would of been reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Now though, school AfDs have become much further scrutinised because of the RfC, and I feel that is a slightly negative aspect. Now, here are the two sources that the RfC requires: http://www.odishanewsinsight.com/sports/mothers-public-school-bhubaneswar-champions-in-basketball-tournament/ https://www.telegraphindia.com/1160604/jsp/jharkhand/story_89196.jsp. '''This satisfies notability for third-world schools, as a contrast to rticles for deletion/Dawn School|this AfD.''' As a further note, |promotional language is a content issue and ought to be discussed at the article's talk page, not here
— User:J947, 22:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:Attribution)