Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy (demon)
The nomination is essentially an "I've never heard of it" argument.  I do believe that the list of stubs related to demons has gotten a bit excessive, but this is valid, verified information (and fairly well known in the circles familiar with the references cited) and should not simply be deleted.  I think Demons in Goetia could be an alternative in the event of a merge, which would allow for slightly more information (such as is contained in this stub) to be provided above a mere list.  Such a list, by the way, would be superfluous, since the list is already there in the Goetia article, which I assume those who voted for deletion based on  and the like seem to have missed. To single out one of these listed and sourced 72 for deletion doesn't seem reasonable
— User:Zahakiel, 03:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BOLLOCKS (Wikipedia:Complete bollocks)