Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English versions of the Nicene Creed
This article is wall-to-wall |OR and the subject itself isn't notable. Every single source cited is a primary source documenting a particular English-language version to which many Wikipedians shamefully contributed. These versions are then followed by OR commentary about what makes each different. There is not a single secondary source discussing the topic or providing any commentary on the differences. Not only should this be deleted wikt:forthwith|forthwith, I would seriously question every editor that saw this article and failed to nominate it
— User:Chris, 19:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)