Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User State Migration Tool
as the editor who seconded the prod when the article was named USMT(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USMT&diff=265022352&oldid=265020966 diff). As far as I am concerned, this is still promotional FAQ instead of a valid Wikipedia article. If it's kept, it needs a complete, non-promotional rewrite to get it to Wikipedia standard. The sources mentioned above should be incorporated ''into the article'' to bolster the points regarding notability (for it to meet , there must be some |reliable sourcing outside of Microsoft. This reads like a Microsoft promo or FAQ sheet instead of what it should be: an article in Wikipedia
— User:B, 18:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)