Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of conservatism
The article is a clear case of original research. there are no sources saying these are noteworthy or key events in the history off conservatism, which is already a term with so many different meanings in different cultures, countries and eras as to be unsuitably vague for building a clear-cut timeline. The items are arbitrary, with no objective reason for their inclusion. A typical case it the entry for the appoint of Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court. Is he the only conservative judge worthy of note since 1500, anywhere in the world? Obviously not. Was Michael Steele a notable conservative in the scheme of things? Not at all: he was an unpopular head of the U.S. Republican Party for a couple of years. I think that it is impossible to write an article at this title which will follow all three core content polices: , , and , and so it should be deleted. &nbsp
— User:Will, 07:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Verifiability)