Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JWASM
Slashdot has http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/01/29/1632253/x86-Assembler-JWASM-Hits-Stable-Release posted the review of JWASM.  FWIW, I find Unitanode's many allegations of bad faith above to be offensive and destructive of this discussion.  The fact is, Slashdot is a ''pretty good'' source, and one that does exercise editorial discretion in publishing articles (maybe not as much as I would like, but that's even more true of, say Fox News or Washington Times).  In any case, publishing there is no different as a principle than publishing in an academic journal... there's not "COI" in finding a topic notable enough to publish about.  And there's no reason that someone who happens to be a WP editor is barred from publishing elsewhere (for example, I have personally published to a variety of 's on topics that are covered by WP articles I monitor... in some cases, I am one of the cited sources in some such articles... that's not bad faith, it is simply the areas of my expertise
— User:Lulu, 20:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)