Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barzilai paradox
I see no citations of this work in the ISI World of Knowledge, nor does "Barzilai paradox" generate any WoS hits.  I think this means there's no scientific equivalent of "widespread coverage" of the topic in reliable secondary sources required by .  I see no strong evidence that anyone but Barzilai himself is working with this idea, therefore no evidence that it's notable
— User:Pete, 07:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)