Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FedEx Express Flight 647
I find it honestly bizzare to see the article described as a ''biography of an aircraft''. And also in the various air-crash AfD's I've seen, no matter how acrimonious the debate got (and it gets pretty nasty sometimes!),  has never been brought up.  may be a "project-level essay", but it is still ''the'' standard used for the evaluation of aircraft-crash articles to determine if they should be deleted on grounds of notability. In addition, invoking  on an event that occured in 2003, and didn't have an article created until 2006, is, IMHO, picayune and stretching the definition of "not news" considerably (is something still "news" three years after the event? How about seven years?).  It should also be noted that the crash and its NTSB report are cited in books published in 2008 (http://books.google.com/books?id=kJSDJkgym-EC&pg=PA53&dq=%22Express+Flight+647%22&hl=en&ei=WAYBTfXSGcSclgesjanQCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Express%20Flight%20647%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=B3ng54W3sQ8C&pg=PA376&dq=%22Express+Flight+647%22&hl=en&ei=WAYBTfXSGcSclgesjanQCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Express%20Flight%20647%22&f=false) and 2009 (http://books.google.com/books?id=6S-CzE5Uw-sC&pg=PA160&dq=%22Express+Flight+647%22&hl=en&ei=WAYBTfXSGcSclgesjanQCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Express%20Flight%20647%22&f=false) - thus demonstrating 'continued coverage
— User:The, 16:42, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:EVENT||WP:AIRCRASH||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Notability)