Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pussy (2nd nomination)
The article is in need of reorganization, better sourcing, and a clearer idea of what its subject is. It also appears to have some issues with original research. That said, deletion is not for clean-up. I'll venture to say that the subject to be treated is the word ''pussy'', and the history of its interrelated meanings. A Google Books search does find some sources that appear to be more or less on point, but none that are, at a glance, clearly sufficient on their own; thus the weakness of my !vote. By the way, given that this is a  article and that there are at least two specific things that readers searching for the term likely intend (''cat'' or ''vulva''; I'm discounting ''coward'' on no evidence stronger than my own impressions), I'm not convinced that this is the 
— User:Cnilep, 06:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WORDISSUBJECT||WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)