Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello Ghost
First and foremost that's not what |"Wikipedia is not a blog" actually means: Wikipedia articles can use ''some'' blogs that are distinctly proven reliable as sources. The current structure, albeit lacking at places, is well on its way to be encyclopedic. Sure, a number of the nom's complaints are true (lack of critical reception, plus the not-so-articulate language in the Plot section is really getting to me), these are surmountable problems which I am encouraging anyone who has the ability (to read Korean, which I don't) to |go fix it (phrase better, cut down on plot, add critical reviews, etc.). Notability is not a problem here IMO as per current cites, with similar sentiments as with Tokyogirl. '''野狼院ひさし
— User:Hisashiyarouin, 09:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTBLOG||WP:SOFIXIT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)