Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Belfield (2nd nomination)
Unlike the claim made by the sole other participant in the first discussion, the existence of two reliable sources is ''not'' necessarily enough to get a person over  — if you're shooting for "has a hard pass of an inherent notability marker, like winning a top award in his field or being elected as an MP", then one or two sources is enough, but if you're shooting for "hasn't accomplished anything inherently notable, but is soft notable anyway because media coverage exists", then it takes a lot more than just two sources to vault that bar. But no, the article doesn't claim anything that's "inherently" notable enough to justify leaning this heavily on primary sources in lieu of real media coverage
— User:Bearcat, 21:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)