Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consolidated Rite
Fails both  and .  It does not really matter whether the subject qualifies as a Masonic "Rite" or not... the important question is whether it is ''Notable'' enough (as a topic) for Wikipedia to have a stand-alone article about it.  I don't think it is. Both  and  require that a topic be discussed (in reasonable depth) by reliable sources that are ''independent'' of the topic.  Such sources simply do not exist
— User:Blueboar, 13:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)