Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unlabeled sexual orientation
At the end |neologism , it says that if there's a noteable topic for which no well established term exists, we should use a plain english phrase. So I dont think that phenomena for where there's no established term need to off bounds.  I had this confirmned a few weeks back by the folks on the no original reasearch notice board.  Granted it seems to be hard to find good sources, but the ones already present seem to confirm the noteability of the phenomena
— User:FeydHuxtable, 20:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)