Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Devabhaktuni
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by  and fails to state a reason subject should be considered notable in lieu of sources under .  As an , subject might be found notable based on his scholarly work but http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=qYbMUeIAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao his profile indicates that his top paper has only received 301 citations.  (In general, a significant paper is one that received over 1000 citations.)  Perhaps it's simply  for this subject
— User:Msnicki, 15:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)