Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knapp Street
public streets don't "always pass WP:GNG". Some of these should have some level of disambiguation applied if they continue to exist. Why is this Knapp Street primary over https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Grand+Rapids,+MI&hl=en&ll=42.994227,-85.636196&spn=0.060518,0.058279&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=65.645551,59.677734&oq=Grand+Rapids,&hnear=Grand+Rapids,+Kent,+Michigan&t=m&z=14 the one in Grand Rapids, Michigan, which is the equivalent to 2 Mile Road in that county's Mile Road System (Michigan)|mile road system? Unscintillating's comments on how these streets supposedly pass GNG aren't exactly the case. Each article must make an individual claim to notability. Concerning the nominated Knapp Street, footnote 1 only establishes notability for the sewage plant. Footnote 2 only establishes notability for the hotel, not the street. Foonote 3, as mentioned in the article, is a "brief mention", which doesn't establish notability. Notability isn't inherited by the street only which these features are located. Based on past precedent, as outlined in , city streets have contested notability; they simply need to demonstrate that the ''street itself'' is notable. These articles do not. Saying they are "residential yet important" or "residential yet primary" or even just "primary" without some official source to back that status is a bit of a POV. (In my home state, county roads and city streets are legally classified as either primary/local or major/minor respectively.) Claiming primary status without a source to back that (and no, the wider yellow line on Google Maps won't cut it) is an enhancement, and there aren't sources to back any claims of notability in these articles
— User:Imzadi1979, 05:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ROADOUTCOMES (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)