Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 China censorship of Google services
i) The present tense is used only because it is not a incident in the past, but a incinent from past to present. It is still blocked now. (ii) Wikipedia:CFORK issue. I don't think it is a content fork. By definition, A content fork is the creation of multiple separate articles all treating the same subject. However, it is a complete article. Even if you really think it is a content fork, it should be included in the exclusion rule - related articles. (iii)  issue, the non-neutral words such as "obviously" have already removed. If there are still some, then please remove the words. (iv)  issue. Most of the words have citation, exception some with the {{citation needed}} templates. Moreover, citations to non-English sources are allowed, although English-language sources are preferred. I don't think that "I don't understand non-English sources" can be a reason to deny the reliability of sources
— User:Yejianfei, 18:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:VERIFY (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)