Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies surrounding Royal Dutch Shell
You are aware that we have mechanisms for a proposed merge beyond *fD, right? Is the nom actually calling for deletion? Also, doesn't half of the nom basically negate ? OR should be removed, but most of the article is well sourced. If you'd prefer they be so tightly focused in pursuit of GA status, then split the events into other articles (lord knows it's well past what's called for by , and always has been) and/or merge the strongly sourced points to the (already large) parent article. AfD seems like an odd place to bring this up
— User:MrZaius, 16:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SPLIT||WP:LENGTH (Wikipedia:Splitting)