Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cray Valley Paper Mills F.C.
Comment''' I have not looked for sources for this club. However I hope that the closer takes note of the quality of the argument presented; the vast majority of these comments do not make a true argument for notability, citing  which most definitely is not . It's important to remember why SNGs exist: as a '''shortcut not a replacement''' to proving that an article subject meets  and . It is presumed that if an article topic passes SNG that there will be enough sources available to satisfy GNG. I don't have time at the moment to evaluate the sourcing offered by {{u|SportingFlyer}} but appreciate their efforts to make a GNG argument rather than relying on a project guideline in an AfD. If footy fans feel that FOOTYN should be more than it is, at minimum I would think about getting community consensus to incorporating AfD results into  if not . Best
— User:Barkeep49, 19:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FOOTYN||WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:NFOOTY (Wikipedia:Notability)