Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omnitrix
per Ravenmasterq's careful analysis.  Lack of ''independent'' and ''secondary'' sources is fatal for an encyclopedia article, but typical of nonencyclopedic fancruft.  The arguments for keep display a fundamentally flawed understanding of  (''reliable, third-party published sources'') and  (''Any interpretation of primary source material requires a secondary source
— User:Quale, 14:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)