Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mockingbird Don't Sing
I don't especially like the trend of article creation for seemingly every banal film coming down the pipeline these days, and here we can actually do something about it (though the discussion isn't quite going as I would have liked it to). OK, so ''Variety'' reviewed it, like they do most films, and it's in the IMDb, a site the very purpose of which is to list all films ever made (and, keep in mind, IMDb ≠ Wikipedia). Beyond that? Nothing. No evidence of box-office success, no particularly notable actors (Kim Darby doesn't fit the bill), no claim to any sort of cultural impact (in response to Dhartung asking "What policy requires this?": , quite simply. Let's not get bogged down in legalisms. We're trying to build a better encyclopedia, and the presence of this article isn't helping, which is why it should go, even if it happens not to transgress WP:FICT.), a director who's a redlink... So ''why''? Why on earth keep an article on such a film? No real reason; let the IMDb do it - that's what they're there for
— User:Biruitorul, 04:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)