Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Doehner
This was really challenging. It's true that the only reason Doehner was notable was because he survived the Hindenberg (): {{tq|When the role played by an individual in the event is less significant, an independent article may not be needed, and a redirect is appropriate.}} However, there is extensive significant coverage (not reflected in the article, but exists) both over the years and now on his death. I've gone back and forth between  and  and . I finally narrowed it down to this part of : {{tq|'''The significance of''' an event or '''the individual's role is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources'''.}} In this case, significant coverage was persistent over the years, particularly as other survivors died until he was the last one. Multiple highly-respected sources consider his role significant, even though his "role" was simply continuing to live. So, I say we should keep it
— User:Schazjmd, 22:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:1E||WP:GNG||WP:1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)