Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kirk
probably a borderline case but I want to note that being an emeritus professor or having written a bunch of reviews (!) is clearly not sufficient. The key question, which supporters have failed to address, is whether there exist sufficient third-party coverage of his work to built an article in line with . I'm not saying that's not possible but this should be the issue
— User:Pascal, 15:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATT (Wikipedia:Attribution)