Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord John and the Succubus
to Diana_Gabaldon#Lord_John_series. In addition to SwisterTwister's finds, there are reviews at Kirkus reviews and Entertainment Weekly, but each were just a paragraph within a larger review. I have not yet found any in-depth independent reviews from reliable sources, but from all the finds the topic is threshold notable/non-notable. The novella is clearly verifiable and WP users could be expected to search for this title. According to , it is best to preserve verifiable information when we can reasonably do so. A merge or redirect to the Lord John series is best until sufficient sources build for a separate article
— User:Mark, 20:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Editing policy)