Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incest in popular culture (2nd nomination)
per  "'''Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information''' As explained in the policy introduction, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources." There is nothing remotely encyclopaedic about a random contributor-complied list of supposed 'examples' of incest in popular culture. If an article on the subject is merited at all, it is one exclusively based on sources which ''analyse'' the topic in detail - and nothing in the present article remotely fits that description
— User:AndyTheGrump, 21:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)