Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Uncensored Library
We have before us an article that has gotten a lot of international press for several days but for which  has not been met. The amount of coverage is far above the trifling coverage typical of articles deleted per , but much less than articles typically kept per . For the time being, I'm voting keep because of the international coverage and the breadth of coverage of the library. However, if the coverage dies down and it becomes apparent that the library was little more than a novelty, then I think a re-nomination would be appropriate
— User:Spirit, 23:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RAPID (Wikipedia:Notability)