Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bolshevik Influence on Political Correctness
nbsp; I think that we need a guideline or policy to match WP:N and WP:V called "WP:Identifiability", although ringe goes to the point when it says, "Wikipedia is not and must not become the validating source for non-significant subjects."&nbsp; Similar issues were discussed at rticles for deletion/City Seminary, where the closing admin kept a topic whose name identifiability only existed in local slang.&nbsp; A related discussion is occurring at rticles for deletion/Archdiocese of the Goths.&nbsp; In each case, there was something notable or reliable, but the article topic itself failed wp:identifiability.&nbsp; The absence of citations in the lede of this article and the failure of the body of the article to use the word "correctness" confirm that this article is incoherent.&nbsp; If the author (or someone) doesn't request the userfy, then the article has no value to the project and can be deleted.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 19:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:F||WP:A||WP:A (Wikipedia:Non-free content)