Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkhitekton
This seems to be a piece of |original research wrapped around a dictionary definition. No |evidence found in multiple searches (Google, Highbeam, Questia) that this is noted as a professional designation as seems to be the implied thrust of the article text. Similarly nothing found in UK-specific searches of The Guardian and The Independent newspaper sites. And for the specific mention of the 1968 Trades Description Act (now largely superceded): no mention there either. It is also worth noting that the contributing editor is in the process of setting up :Arkhitekton Magazine|a magazine of the same name, to be published next year, on which he has also submitted an article
— User:AllyD, 21:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:OR||:WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)