Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Segall
it's neutral, reasonably well-written and doesn't cover personal irrelevancies. It doesn't read like an autobiography or a puff-piece. It's exactly the sort of article we would be comfortable with were there more sources and were the subject to pass . But he doesn't and we generally don't have articles for losing electoral candidates. In this instance, he didn't even make it to the primary during his second run so there isn't even the "major party candidate" notability that some argue should apply. A couple of lines in press here and there isn't enough to substantiate a pass against  in my view
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 23:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)