Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dovico (company)
per . Applying for a patent does not make a company notable. About.com is not a reliable source of product reviews. KIRA is specific to New Brunswick. Mention in Daptiv case study is unsubstantial (and doesn't describe the company or identify which product it's about). Sidenko mention is unsubstantial. Guha paper is an undergraduate thesis and therefore self-published. I searched for other sources but didn't find any. It belongs in Wikipedia ''after'' there's substantial coverage in reliable sources
— User:Pnm, 05:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)