Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The California Review
Per Nom, alternate merge to UCSD for historical purposes: Fails . A defunct campus newspaper that was active for a couple of years. The use of |primary sources, especially multiple listings of the same source, DO NOT advance notability. This is even more of an issue when the sources are just articles showing the paper existed. I do not see that questioned but the notability for a stand-alone article. The scant non-primary sources that are more about certain incidences other than the paper do not tip the scale
— User:Otr500, 18:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NORG||WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:Notability)