Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popplio
or '''merge all''' of the article's contents to some other suitable destination - I have no idea who or what this character is, but even a brief  search shows significant coverage from reliable independent sources. I know that some people would prefer that Wikipedia editors dedicated their time to writing articles on serious subjects rather than articles about fictional cartoon animals, but  is not a valid reason to delete articles on subjects which pass . My lack of familiarity with the subject means that I don't know whether this would warrant its own article from a  perspective, but given the massive scope of Pokémon's popularity I find it quite easy to believe that most of its characters would at the very least warrant sizable sections within articles regarding closely related subjects in the franchise, if not their own standalone articles. There's simply too much coverage from reliable independent sources at this point
— User:HumanBodyPiloter5, 07:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG||WP:PAGEDECIDE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)