Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Hills Bank
Thank you for fixing the first link. The article is based on a company announcement and this is confirmed at the start of the second paragraph. It therefore fails  and/or . You say that you disagree with my assertion that the second link fails  because the article predates the "official" announcement of the name change. https://www.bankerandtradesman.com/hyde-park-savings-bank-to-become-blue-hills-bank/ Here is another article for the same date. Note it clearly refers to "a statement" from the company as the originator of the information. Finally, your assertion that the last reference is "independent of the subject of the article, therefore it meets " may be true, but it misinterprets what I said. The book is self-published and books of this type are generally not acceptable as reliable sources, therefore it fails . Furthermore, the book is 96 pages and the company is mentioned once, in passing, and therefore fails . Finally, I stated that the book is not intellectually independent but this is no longer important to the process of analysing this source for the purpose of meeting the criteria for establishing notability since this book fails on two other counts
— User:HighKing, 16:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)