Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipediocracy (2nd nomination)
I think the article has sufficient sourcing to meet . It's also informative. Moreso than the bazillion stubs on this site. The ownership that Mathsci mentioned above ''is'' included in the article. Those asking to delete this article seem to either have unusually high standards or perhaps suffer from . They seem to want the article to say worse things about the topic in order to match their personal views. And failing to find independent sources for those views, they want the article deleted. But that's not what  says
— User:Psychotropic, 09:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)