Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic genealogy of computer scientists
First of all,  is completely unrelated to anything to do with this discussion.  The page in question is obviously not a directory.  Second, this is not any kind of BLP violation.  Give a specific reason, nom, if you disagree.  Finally, this topic is obviously notable.  Computer scientists were mathematicians until about 75 years ago, so mathematics genealogies provide both sourcing and GNG satisfaction.  See https://books.google.com/books?id=4siw31DPONUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=academic+genealogy+of+computer+scientists&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwijv5O066_aAhXnsVQKHR80A4oQ6AEIJjAA#v=onepage&q=academic%20genealogy%20of%20computer%20scientists&f=false and https://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/ the mathematics genealogy project for two examples out of very, very many.  Not only that, but genealogies specific to computer science are also pretty common, see e.g. https://books.google.com/books?id=GFX2qiLuRAMC&pg=PA46&dq=academic+genealogy+of+computer+scientists&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwijv5O066_aAhXnsVQKHR80A4oQ6AEIQTAF#v=onepage&q=academic%20genealogy%20of%20computer%20scientists&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=mocvDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA15&dq=academic+genealogy+of+computer+scientists&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwijv5O066_aAhXnsVQKHR80A4oQ6AEISDAG#v=onepage&q=academic%20genealogy%20of%20computer%20scientists&f=false, and so on.  This isn't OR by any means.  This is a well-studied, easily sourceable subject whose article could use some references.  Absolutely not a candidate for deletion. Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
— [[User talk:192.160.216.52|talk]]), 13:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIRECTORY (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)