Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deutsche Standard
per lack of reliable sources.  Even the company's own web site lacks any claim that it has 2B+ in annual income.  No prejudice against undeletion for the purposes of userfication- or draft-ification upon-request by a established editor provided he immediately adds at least one reliable-source reference that back up some claim of notability.  No prejudice against re-creating a new article or moving a userspace or other draft (including one based on this version) into mainspace provided the article goes through a review process such as  or something similar first. '''If a reliable, independent source that support the 2B+ revenue are provided before the end of this discussion and I don't contribute to this discussion after that edit, change to "abstain"'''.  Better yet, ping me when it happens
— User:davidwr, 23:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AFC (Wikipedia:Articles for creation)