Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Emily Dickinson poems
The list is not encyclopedia material but rather, effectively, a table of contents.  It does nothing to help to inform readers about Dickinson, and runs afoul of the basic principle that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  It is also surely false that each of Dickinson's poems is worthy  of an article of its own (even in principle, disregarding the unlikeliness that anyone will ''write'' all those articles) -- this idea, if put into practice, would run far afoul of , as the great majority of the poems (beyond the few most famous ones) do not have enough of an existing critical history for anything much non-OR to be said about them
— User:Rbellin, 00:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)