Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheFinalBall
per nom. Can't really see any third-party coverage of this, or its main variations ZeroZero or Ogol. Side note: The site shouldn't be used as a reference as it's data includes |user-generated content (I'll raise this separately). However, the fact that a site is being used as a source on Wikipedia doesn't make it notable, per the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CricketArchive
— User:Nzd, 11:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UGC (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)