Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatnik (programming language)
You don't have to repeat your own vote, and moreover written uppercase. And '''it is notable''' as you can see above your last comments, that's why I asked you for some arguments. Well, I can provide some counterarguments, after I have read yours {{smiley}}. There's no simple way to determine, if some lang is useful or not, if a large number of them are Turing complete.  Some of them are usable to code a kernel, some are suitable for SQL queries. But when we talk about the '''esoteric''', not just a programming languages, their purposes obviously change. As you can read in the Esoteric_programming_language#Cultural_context_of_esolangs|Esoteric programming language § Cultural context of esolangs, esolangs can be considered as code art and code poetry. The Art is not always useful, it's just art and may impress someone, that's why it exists. And IMO Beatnik is interesting and unique enough, to deliver its existence to readers in that way. Programming languages consist of things with a wide variety of usage. And Wikipedia should cover this outline, not just the small part, which let you code a business app or a next game. And I agree with you that not every part of the Internet should be sucked into the Wikipedia as it's not a , but this topic is significantly different, it's not a simple  from some place on the Internet. Cheers
— User:Rezonansowy, 21:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEBHOST||WP:COPYPASTE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)