Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorven Public School
or optional '''Merge/Redirect''': Wikipedia:FAILN|Fails any |notability criterion. Attempts to rake through the leaves to find sources to |prove |existence does not advance notability per Wikipedia:CORPDEPTH. Satisfaction of even the barest |notability standards requires |verification by '''"significant coverage''' in '''|reliable sources''' that are '''ndependent sources|independent of the subject"'''. Assertions |"that all the other comparable schools qualify" is not a good argument and #RfC on secondary school notability|dubious without evidence of a |"clear claim to notability" (#1). While |listing all schools in the world might be a noble idea, lack of coverage would be evidence the subject might be better located in Chandapura (really in need of expansion and a fantastic place for a "School" section) where a single |primary source (shown above) might be sufficient also adding substance to that article. It is my opinion that the creation of thousands of unsourced or poorly sourced forever stubs, possibly just for the sake of inclusion (or maybe even just growing Wikipedia), is not a good goal. If there is already coverage on Wikipedia then expand that article. If the content grows too big we can then consider splitting-off as |not every subject in the world qualifies for a stand-alone article
— User:Otr500, 12:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROVEIT||WP:ITEXISTS||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:I||WP:OTHER||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:FAILORG||WP:notability||WP:reliable sources||WP:primary (Wikipedia:Verifiability)