Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hillary Clinton controversies
I think, at the very least, this listing is an example of  – it's completely one-sided, the listing is only negative and hence the definition of a |coatrack. I will also note that this listing sounds awfully like an |attack page: non-neutral, and considering when it was created (during an impending presidential campaign) I regrettably believe that its purpose may have been to disparage the subject. Now, the creator may continue to wp:bludgeon|bludgeon their point that "there are similar articles on x, y, or z" – but I'm actually referring to ''this'' article and ''this'' subject
— User:MelbourneStar, 15:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CHERRY||WP:COATRACK||WP:ATP (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)