Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Gettleson
The amount of content in this article is striking and maybe a bit misleading. There seems to be a lot of |dot-connecting that creates tenuous conclusions about the subject's involvement in a wide range of events. Some sources used do not mention Gettleson even once. I'll grant that the articles listed above do come from independent, reliable sources, but that's not quite enough to pass . The way the article's written also makes it seem like Gettleson was the primary actor in the Cambridge Analytica/Vote Leave scandal. Gettleson was a background player at best or at least not the center of the scandal (he doesn't even warrant conclusion in the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal|scandal's own Wikipedia article or in the Cambridge Analytica or Vote Leave pages). I do think this article qualifies as both  (because, in many areas, its goal seems to be building a case against the subject, using information from a broader, actually notable topic and occasionally using sources in which the subject isn't even mentioned) and  (because the 2015 Lib Dem scandal—a non-event for which Gettleson was exonerated—was relatively minor and would never be enough to establish notability on its own
— User:Gargleafg, 01:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYN||WP:GNG||WP:COATHOOK||WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:No original research)