Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WingtraOne
In general, "a specific type of aircraft that has flown" has been considered to be ''prima facie'' evidence of notability; the explosion of mini-/micro-/nano-/itsybitsyteenyweenie-drones has made that a bit wobbly in their situations, though, as radio-controlled aircraft do ''not'' count, in Wikipedia terms, as aircraft - where is the line between "aircraft" and "toy"? That said, once a little elbow grease was applied to some ''very'' simple formatting of the article, suddenly it looks much more like an article and much less like an advertisement. And while the  of references does include a lot of the "not intellectually independent" types that are in vogue at AfD to be called out, I believe there is enough here - perhaps ''just'' enough, but enough nontheless - to establish  compliance. The article does, in fact, need a lot more polish and pruning of the spamosity that is in the aforementioned bombardment, but |AfD is not for cleanup - and, at this point, all that is needed is cleanup, not deletion
— User:The, 08:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BOMBARDMENT||WP:GNG||WP:NOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)