Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientific acupuncture
the article meets the definition of a POV-fork. The editor(s) creating it obviously want to separate themselves from criticism of acupuncture and elevate it to a science despite it plainly having a status as an alternative medicine. If there was a single scientific research department at a mainstream medical institution devoted to "scienctific acupuncture", then I could see this article existing. As it is, what we have is a tactic of avoidance of critique that is done to avoid |NPOV conditions. It's also pretty clear that the article represents an original synthesis of material which makes it plainly |original research. Too many damning points in favor of deletion. We can stick to the acupuncture article as the main source for information on the subject
— User:ScienceApologist, 12:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)