Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Allan Feldman
As things stand right now, the sourcing here is ''far'' too dependent on ''unreliable'' and ''non-independent'' sources (e.g. YouTube videos, |blogs, |primary source public relations profiles on the websites of directly affiliated organizations, and content where he's the ''author'' and not the ''subject'' of the cited reference), which is ''not'' the kind of sourcing it takes to get a person into Wikipedia. A candidate in a party primary is not entitled to a Wikipedia article on that basis itself, but rather gets a Wikipedia article ''only'' if they were ''already'' eligible for one ''before'' running in the primary — but ''nothing'' that's been written or sourced here demonstrates that he had any preexisting notability at all. Given that this is the ''presidential'' primary, it's possible that merely winning the nomination ''could'' be enough notability to get him over the bar — for most offices it isn't, but most offices don't generate even a fraction of 0.0000001 per cent as much media coverage as the presidential race gets. And even if that ''does'' happen, it still doesn't confer an ''automatic'' inclusion freebie — if the |reliable source coverage still doesn't take a ''big'' jump afterward, then he ''still'' won't get to keep an article that's sourced like ''this''. No prejudice against recreation in the future if he wins the party's nomination and the coverage of him increases accordingly — but until that happens, he doesn't get to use Wikipedia as a campaign tool
— User:Bearcat, 23:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLOGS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)