Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deauxma (2nd nomination)
mdash; Notability ''guidelines'' are just that - guidelines. A subject or topic that meets a particular notability guideline IS NOT guaranteed a stand-alone Wikipedia article.  One of the primary functions of the AfD process is to determine if a subject, which is "presumed to be notable" (by virtue of meeting an SNG) is ''actually'' notable. Consensus at an AfD can and does override notability guidelines, especially when the article is not or cannot be in compliance with actual policy like BLP or V.  When the presumption of notability from the guideline conflicts with the requirement to have a neutral, well-sourced, well-written article, then you CAN and DO "just ignore" the guideline.  Not because you don't like it, but because meeting a notability guideline is NOT A GUARANTEE that the subject gets an article. Regarding this specific article, my opinion after having read the article and checked the sources, is that this person is '''not sufficiently notable''' to have a Wikipedia article,  be damned, because the sources are ''not sufficient'' to write a neutral, truly verifiable article about this living person. &mdash
— User:Darkwind, 05:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PORNBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)