Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal status of Hawaii
I agree that it avoids , although it is a very, very minority view. I was able to view the first source, and its a law review note (drafted by a law student) rather than an article authority by a professor. It may be a stretch to refer to such as a "scholar" but again, that goes to cleanup, not whether the article should be kept. Merger per the nomination may be an option, but frankly, I think this article may be the easier one to bring up to appropriate standards
— User:Xymmax, 16:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)