Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark O'Keefe
Being a major party's non-winning candidate for state governor can be enough for an encyclopedia article ''if'' he's shown as the subject of enough |reliable source coverage to clear , but it is not an automatic inclusion freebie that ''exempts'' him from having to have enough reliable source coverage to clear GNG. But this is completely unsourced, and literally identical to the original version from 2004 but for the toning-down of one -violating adjective about the outgoing predecessor. What ''actually'' happened here is that about a year after it was first created, somebody ''hijacked'' it to be about a Hollywood screenwriter ''instead'' of the Montana gubernatorial candidate, and it remained about the screenwriter for ''12 full years'' until it was reverted back to the gubernatorial candidate just over one week ago on the grounds that the ''screenwriter's'' notability wasn't properly sourced ''either''. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if the politician or the screenwriter (or both) can be ''properly'' sourced as clearing their respective notability criteria, but our tolerance for unsourced BLPs is much, much lower than it was in 2004 and ''neither'' Mark O'Keefe was ''properly'' sourced at all
— User:Bearcat, 17:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)