Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presidential prevarications (United States)
The essay is incredible POV. Selective bolding of words show the POV. Also, the idea of counting "lies" told during public statements in the interest of national security as being the same as lies told under oath about getting a blowjob is apples and oranges. The format (the boxes) don't allow for significant comparison by differing POV's. Instead it just says "here is the truth" as a statement of fact. Was Nixon a "crook"? That would depend on how you define crook, wouldn't it? When I hear "crook", I think thief. Nixon lied. Is that being a "crook"? Depends on who you ask, but this thing simply says "he was". Runs afoul of ,  and possibly  and 
— User:Niteshift36, 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:SYNTH||WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:No original research)