Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OTRS
As written, it does fail . But I found a few sources that suggest keeping is warranted: 1) http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.474.8605&rep=rep1&type=pdf dedicated academic conference paper 2) http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.551.7896&rep=rep1&type=pdf another highly related, seems to be in a journal (http://wseas.org/cms.action?id=4026) 3) https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/104/ academic theses on the topic. There seems to be a bit more on GScholar, overal, the academic treatment of this is likely sufficient for keeping. The nom should Google Scholar, not just Google, in the future
— User:Piotrus, 09:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)