Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bible und Muhammed
the article needs to have reasonable references, otherwise it's |original research.  The sources, as mentioned above, are almost all spurious.  If it is properly referenced, I don't see why it can't be incorporated into Islamic view of the Bible (which incidentally, also could use a cleanup) without a sub-article
— User:Samir_, 05:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)