Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House)
The original mass nomination of 20 articles would have make improvement of those 20 a bit problematic, but finding it now includes an aditional 112 articles does not allow any reasonable or common sense expectation that all 132 could or would be improved in a 7 day period.  As noted by other editors, the series' various episodes have |received individual recognition and commentary.  As each has sources available, we have an individual notability apart from the notability of the series.  Wikipedia itself recognizes that it is |not perfect and that there is always |work that can be done.  But it does not also demand that 132 improvable articles must be fixed in |seven days.  Immediatism is not policy, unreferenced does not automatically equate to unreferencable, and patience can improve the project.  The nominator left a neutral notice on my talk page about an AFD to delete 20 season one articles.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMichaelQSchmidt&action=historysubmit&diff=417088660&oldid=416825654  It was only after arriving that I learned the number of articles being considered for deletion had grown nearly 700% from 20 articles to 132
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 07:40, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:IMPROVE||WP:DEADLINE (Wikipedia:Notability)