Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roma Virtual Network
Some of you newcomers seem to hold a wrong impression of what constitutes, under Wikipedia policy and guidelines, a |"reliable" source.  It is a reliable, independent, ''published'' third-party source with a proven reputation for fact-checking.  Moreover, the source must discuss the subject of the article at length; it cannot be what  calls a "trivial mention."  A mere mention of the RVN's existence on some website doesn't count ... and beyond that, Mr. Novoselsky being on the staff of the other organization disqualifies it as "independent" even if there were more than a trivial mention
— User:RGTraynor, 12:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)