Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top international association football goal scorers by country
Who is the highest goal scorer for each country is notable as evidenced by their mention on each (mostly) of their individual country's football page, and the fact that every player that nears their county's record gets a chunk of coverage when they are about to pass their predecessor, as evidenced most recently by CR7, but also by many others, including Robbie Keane, Falcao, Messi, and even others who are still some way off, but likely to get there given their youth, eg http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11915987 Wood. This itself I don't believe is the question here, but rather should a combined list of them exist. I suggest it should. This is an article I frequently refer to for easy comparison of those that reach records, to compare for example how many more or less matches these record holders took to reach their tallies. There is nothing in NOTSTATS that suggests this list should not exist. It is not an''Excessive listing of unexplained statistics'', it is a ''concise list of explained records''. There does not appear to be anything in  relevant here, except PAPER which is not a delete argument. The ''LISTCRUFT '' argument does not wash with me as of the 12 bullet point Wikipedia:Listcruft#Meaning|Meanings, none apply except arguably #8, and I submit that also doesn't apply as there are many examples of sources that list the top international goal scorers. http://www.goal.com/en/news/ronaldo-moves-into-top-10-international-goalscorers-with-71/llrwnqswta9t1c7bc5quh89ku https://m.sportskeeda.com/football/stats-highest-international-goalscorers-time-robbie-keane http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/41-international-goalscorers-who-wayne-6409147. Maybe not so many broken out to show only top per country, but refining the information is not against policy.  In fact, EVERYTHING suggests ''A Wikipedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject.'' This is a good example of summarising information from multiple articles into a concise format.  Club
— [[User_talk:ClubOranje|Oranje]][[User_talk:ClubOranje|T]], 12:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:NOTEVERYTHING (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)