Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWWX
There is a |presumed notability for most broadcast stations, as long as it is |verifiably backed up by |reliable sources. I've expanded the article a bit so that it's not just a two-sentence unsourced stub; I can't guarantee that it will definitively save the article (i.e., if it sufficiently establishes any notability WWWX might have), but it's reasonably safe to say that OUTCOMES|no matter what past outcomes for broadcast station AfDs have suggested about broadcast station notability in general, articles ''must'' have sources to survive an AfD. (Furthermore, even  seems to hint that stubs with minimal content — and far too many radio station articles fall under that category — aren't really encouraged at this point. For that reason, I do ''not'' feel this justifies a speedy keep |based on the criteria; the article had been around as a stub since 2007 with little-to-no sourcing, and had ''no'' references at the time of nomination — an article persisting like that for so long is definitely at risk for potential deletion. Indeed, this may be more of a ''weak'' keep !vote than I'd prefer to admit
— User:Wcquidditch, 00:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BCAST||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BCASTOUTCOMES||WP:BCAST||WP:SKCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)