Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institutes studying Chinese Law
there's always a gray area. In fact, if the article was a |stand-alone list with working wikipedia articles for most institutes, I might probably say keep, because it would follow the guidelines and have notable entries. But it's mostly external links, suggesting that the institutes are not notable on their own and the page just becomes a directory of links hosted on Wikipedia, which is not what an encyclopedia or navigational lists are for.--Special:Contributions/137.122.49.102|137.122.49.102
— [[User talk:137.122.49.102|talk]]), 16:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SAL (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)