Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernon Ashley
While there are certainly claims in the article that ''might'' qualify him ''if'' they were |properly sourced, nothing claimed in the article automatically ''entitles'' him to keep it just because he existed — and the only sources present are a WordPress blog and his death notice on the website of the church that held his funeral, neither of which are |reliable sources for the purpose of establishing notability. No prejudice against recreation in the future ''if'' somebody can dig out enough archived coverage in ''media'' about his work to get him over , but nothing in this version cuts the mustard at all
— User:Bearcat, 17:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)