Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ion Storm (Command & Conquer)
and '''Comment'''  To refute your refutation...neither the existence nor notability of the Solar_wind (the redirect for the astronomical phenomenon) is being disputed in this AFD.  Nor is the existence of the ion storm in the game - rather, I think it's really just the notability of the C&C ion storm.  There's not really a huge problem with including too much detail, except when that detail turns into a new article.  Since every article on Wikipedia is expected to eventually (through good editing) be good enough to become a featured article on the main page, there comes a point where a full article on a minor topic is not warranted, and should instead be shrunk down enough to be merged into another article.  I'd rather not address the "big stink about sources" and will simply direct you to .  That's one of Wikipedia's three big policies - don't take it lightly.  As far as the "game guide argument"...I actually agree with you.  Probably the reason that argument was tacked on was because of
— User:Proto, 15:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)