Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Paulus (2nd nomination)
well sourced by at least 3 sources, there is no reason for deletion. The alternatives would be to put all this stuff in Clay Aiken's article, with a redirect (which would be ), or ignore the subject entirely (which would be an indication of our ). It's trashy and gossipy, but its not WP's gossip, it's the mainstream media's gossip. For an encyclopedia that insists on keeping every also ran on every version of reality show known to mankind, to delete this would also seem to be against precedent
— User:Carlossuarez46, 19:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)