Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sentinel Trilogy
In the end, sales mean absolutely nothing. Something can sell insanely well, yet never meet notability guidelines. Given a few minutes, I could probably point you towards about a dozen romance novels that have landed on the NYT bestseller list, yet never received enough coverage to merit an entry. Heck, Laurell K Hamilton is a millionairess that writes urban fantasies that routinely end up on the NYT bestseller lists, yet her latest book (Affliction) doesn't pass notability guidelines. All that selling well means is that the book and/or its author will receive coverage in reliable sources. Now as far as the sources in the article go, only one is even remotely close to being a reliable source, the one from Cambridge News. However that one falls under local coverage, which doesn't really count towards much. The others are either  sources or they're from non-notable book review blogs, which are almost always a dime a dozen when it comes to book reviews. It takes an awful lot for a blog to be considered reliable and none of these cut it. It doesn't help that the article has some promotional tinged notes to it, which I think is due to the COI. This just isn't notable enough for its own article at this point in time, if ever
— User:Tokyogirl79, 20:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:No original research)