Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Law of One (The Ra Material)
Subjects related to this article have gone through the ringer here at Wikipedia, but claims that it passes  have not been convincing. Basically, the ''only'' sources which discuss this book and the associated claimed channeled entity are books that take the claim seriously. There are hundreds if not thousands of examples of books that are self-published about claims "discovered" during channeling sessions, and there are many instances of New Age true believers writing various supportive (and sometimes less-than-supportive when they don't think a particular channeled work is relevant) text about a particular claim.  is intended to ask for people who aren't in the same fringe community (and Kinney, for example, clearly is). We don't need a skeptical source, necessarily, just something  like a media piece, a historian, or an academic who thinks the particular fringe idea (or channeled entity in this case) is noteworthy beyond the sensationalism. Why Ra has remained in Wikipedia in spite of this clear necessity for truly independent sources is something I still don't understand
— User:I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc, 11:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFRINGE||WP:FRIND||WP:MAINSTREAM (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)