Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day-by-day summaries of the 2012 Australian Open
These should not have ever been created into separate Wikipedia:Content forking|content forking, which the creation of this is a |POVFORK to highlight these as being so-called news and |INDISCRIMINATE.  These are intricle parts of the main article, and without them the 2012 Australian Open has virtually no context and plot lines to the event, such as the 2009 Australian Open has with the inclusion of the day-by-day aricles.  I think we use |SIZERULE to much, which when a Grand Slam deserves the extra information, we can go over the limit, which only occurs four times a year.  By the way, |Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia clearly states this is a general encyclopedia at the same time a specialized one, so we can have them because we can create a tennis encyclopdia inside Wikipedia with more detailed content including these Wikitable.  I agree these articles don't stand on their own, nor should they have ever been created.  So, I say keep the information and merge it back onto the main article because we have had four years of consensus for them on the main grand slam tournament articles just go look
— User:HotHat, 05:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:SIZERULE||WP:ENC (Wikipedia:Content forking)