Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Bone
Some more details why I don't think Bone passes otability, particularly the requirement of '''significant coverage''': While it is true that several major news sources published an article about Deborah Bone in early 2015 (a few days after her death), no source (except for The Comet (newspaper)|The Comet, a local newspaper) ran more than this one article, and the content of all these articles is almost identical. See https://www.thecomet.net/news/tributes-paid-to-letchworth-mental-health-nurse-who-inspired-pulp-song-after-recognition-in-new-year-s-honours-list-1-3901598https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/02/deborah-bone-dies-mental-health-pulp-disco-2000-mbehttps://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/deborah-bone-inspiration-for-pulp-s-disco-2000-dies-hours-after-mbe-announcement-1-7030174https://www.nme.com/news/music/pulp-13-1222373https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/music-news/11321647/Deborah-Bone-who-inspired-Pulps-Disco-2000-dies-aged-51.htmlhttps://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-30658292https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/mental-health-nurse-deborah-bone-mbe-who-inspired-pulps-disco-2000-dies-aged-51-9953976.htmlhttps://www.billboard.com/articles/news/6429357/pulp-disco-2000-deborah-bone-dieshttps://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/418140/Pulp-muse-Deborah-Bone-dies-aged-51-of-bone-marrow-cancer (The second article published by The Comet a few days later is a short text about the reception of its article: https://www.thecomet.net/news/letchworth-deborah-s-inspirational-story-circles-the-globe-1-3911606.) It appears that most of the sources basically copied the content from The Comet. (Roughly half of them mention The Comet as a source.)  While the meaning of 'significant coverage' is deliberately left vague by , I think '''a single article is not significant''' (even if there are several slightly different copies of it
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)