Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overwriting (computer science)
as the dePRODer) To be clear the article is not fit for mainspace in is current state, its even more horrific {{noredirect|Overwriting}} points to it.  I dePRODed it because I see, on quick scan, a ''possibility'' of a useful .  To quote the nominator on my talk page, albeit in a different context, "editors are not psychic nor expected to be", any possibly may not be able to envisage how someone else might HEY the article, so "no encyclopedic topic to be had here or prospect for expansion" might be a little bit of an assertion that could end up being disproved.  I refute the topic is covered at computer memory; mainly because the article in its current state is somewhat confused whether its about "computer storage" or "computer memory", and I'd contend the topic can encompass both.  I read the PROD as already being controversial in the talk, with someone at some point seeming to indicate preference for AfD; hence a confidence in dePROD.  As the result of the dePROD I looked at the possibility of doing an AfD but as I felt it could be improved I couldn't pass a BEFORE myself (though no object and in fact expecting someone else to give to take to AfD.  I search for a template such as "This is a basket case article at moment" wikipedia warning template but the best I could manage was a very poor cn before I gave up.  To stress a point, I am strongly not in favor of it remaining in mainspace in its current state.  I'll also be giving a strong oppose to :computer memory as a target as it because can also refer and be relevant to computer storage (Per the categories). Thankyou
— User:Djm, 22:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:HEY (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)