Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rendille–Boni languages
Wikipedia is not the place for linguists to |work out correct taxonomies. If reliable sources (preferably secondary or tertiary sources) differ on the status of the family, that controversy needs to be noted, with |due weight to the published sources on each side. But that does not suggest that the controversial conclusions should be deleted from Wikipedia. True, the stub article currently cites only one source, but that source, ''Ethnologue'', is for better or worse often the key work for such issues
— User:Cnilep, 02:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:No original research)