Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan-Michael Cox
This is a really difficult one. The nominator is right - it does read like a resume and the list of artists is excessive, unreferenced, and needs pruning. There is worse: the exact text of the article appears elsewhere so it might be a copyright violation (but then, those other articles could be mirroring Wikipedia) and it is under-referenced - of the three links only one actually works and it's not major coverage. Indeed, some of the assertions appear to fail simple checks - for example, the article states 4 GRAMMY's have been awarded, but the http://www.grammy.com/nominees/search?artist=Bryan+Cox&title=&year=All&genre=All GRAMMY website disputes this, with only one listed (and its for a different year). Therein lies the problem: the article is clearly unreliable but even one GRAMMY award meets inclusion criteria ( #8). My recommendation is to prune the article down to a stub containing only what is verifiably referenced, or failing that to delete with no prejudice against anyone recreating a properly referenced replacement
— User:RichardOSmith, 20:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MUSICBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)