Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assembled Brands
per . The "new and improved " is not entirely improved; it tends to assumptively eliminate all business media coverage as routine from the start, regardless of the actual content in said media, and some reporters/articles/sources are more independent than others. Then, deletionists may sometimes just say "delete per ,  ...(et al.) anyway, and sometimes don't even bother actually reading the sources, only base notability upon sources within an article (see ), or even worse, don't bother to engage in  searches (not saying that anyone within this discussion has done so). Not a bright precedent for the encyclopedia; it dumbs it down. Also, no prejudice against '''merging''' to Adam Pritzker as per DGG's stance above, which is correspondent with -M
— User:Northamerica1000, 10:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:SPIP||WP:NCORP||WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)