Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vp.art
The books listed as references have nothing to do with "Vp.art". Essentially, this is original research and a |neologism. This isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia. If there were specific, third-party references ''about'' Vp.art, that would be different. But as it stands, this is a non-notable art form
— User:Freshacconci, 00:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)