Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nooka
per nom,  and . Notwithstanding the https://vimeo.com/101344976#t=28s video which the nominator highlights (in which the owner/operator of the company states himself that it is "such a small company"), the only coverage that I can find are all linked from the article itself. Like https://forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2014/08/13/trying-to-rebuild-a-company-with-crowdfunding-nooka the Forbes piece. Which seems to be as much about how small companies use crowdfunding sites to overcome their size/funding issues, as it is about the subject itself. And, frankly, would seem to further reinforce the nominators point (that this company is no more notable than any other small organisation or Indiegogo subscriber). Other pieces https://www.europastar.com/news/1004089379-the-story-of-nooka-watches-a-warning-for-other.html like this one seem to reinforce this point. (That, of the limited coverage that the subject has had, much of it seems to be actually focused on its ''lack'' of notability/prominence.) The COI/promo overtones in the original creation are also concerning. Personally I'd advocate deletion
— User:Guliolopez, 14:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)