Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gore Effect (2nd nomination)
Being a neologism is not a reason to delete.  In fact, we have an entire :Category:Political neologisms devoted to neologisms.  The only thing that really matters here is whether the topic meets the  guidelines.  Given that the article cites 17 different |reliable sources, I think it's obvious that it does.  And if not, here are a few more sources that the article doesn't currently cite.http://www.latimes.com/travel/la-trw-sns-trvrail1-wk4-story.htmlhttp://www.nydailynews.com/news/gore-effect-brings-snow-new-york-city-article-1.436120http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gore-effect-brings-snow-new-york-city-article-1.436120http://www.nationalreview.com/planet-gore/16295/al-gores-climate-extremes/patrick-j-michaelshttp://www.spectator.co.uk/features/notebook/8751471/somerset-notebook
— User:A, 23:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)