Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictitious Jews
as completely idiosyncratic non-topic. We have no article on Fictitious Jews... because fictitious Jewishness is not an encyclopedic concept. If you don't agree, then try writing an article on Fictitious Jews. In general, there shouldn't be a "list of X" unless there is an article on X, and the article should be written first, the list begin as a part of the article, and only be broken out when it becomes too big. As is, alas, usual for so many lists, '''none of the entries are sourced''' and the article therefore completely fails to meet the |verifiability policy. Is this a vacuous criticism? No. Picking one at random, the entry for Leopold Bloom has no citation. It's linked to a Wikipedia article, but, of course, Wikipedia articles are not |considered reliable sources. And if we look at the article for Leopold Bloom, not only does it not cite a source for Bloom's being Jewish, it '''does not even say that he is Jewish.''' What it does say is that he is "the only son of Rudolf Virag (a Hungarian Jew from Szombathely who had converted to Protestantism and later committed suicide) and Ellen, an Irish Catholic."  That might make him Jewish according to the definition used by... oops, never mind, I don't want to trigger Godwin's law... but not by most definitions. So, the list is unreliable, and due to failure to cite sources there's no quick or easy way to sort out the valid entries from the invalid ones
— User:Dpbsmith, 20:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)