Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Dennison (biology)
Does not pass  and does not satisfy  either. Apart from the general  itself, at the moment these seem to be the only applicable guidelines that one could use here to justify notability. The NPR reference is solid, but it is certainly insufficient to establish notability. A GoogleNews (all dates) search turns up only four more mentionshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Robert+Dennison%22+biology+&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8. The only factors to indicate real notability seem to be the awards listed. If more sources and details related to the awards are found, I may be willing to change to weak keep/keep, as one might then argue that he satisfies  (based on criterion 6 of ). I am somewhat sympathetic to Protonk's comments, but at the moment the choice here really is between  and  (and possibly ), neither of which seems to be satisfied here
— User:Nsk92, 03:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)