Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo Stolovitzky
as the nominator and MewMeowth are both blatantly incorrect in their deletion rationales. Having a fellowship in a selective society is, by itself, a criterion for notability; see #C3. His fellowship in the  American Physical Society and in the American Association for the Advancement of Science both clearly qualify for that criterion, and his IBM Fellowship arguably does as well. (The redlinked fellowships and awards, not so much.) He also has highly-cited publications as listed in a Google scholar search, easily enough for #C1, which the nominator does not even seem to have considered or read. The nomination rationale that his position is not senior is both irrelevant and false — he appears to hold a somewhat high-level position within the type of employement he holds, as a researcher at an industrial lab
— User:David, 23:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)