Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulchon (2nd nomination)
Please note that this is not a vote, and no proper arguments have been presented. At best, an argument has been made that better sources may exist. Well, perhaps - but such sources need to be presented. Otherwise no article could be deleted, as one could claim that better sources exist for any AfD topic. I have ensured that WikiProject Korea has been notified through Article Alerts feature, and if any of their members finds a better source, they would/will presumably comment. In light of no such comments, I cannot but conclude that better sources do not exist. As for "6th biggest in Korea", there's no "x-largest in Fooland" provision anywhere in Wikipedia:Notability (companies). Just like in the first discussion, we are seeing nothing but an invalid  statements
— User:Piotrus, 16:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ITSIMPORTANT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)