Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial controversy
The entire article flunks .  Once the  violations are scrubbed, nothing is left.  Perhaps an entirely different article can be written that complies with Wikipedia policy, but I haven't seen anyone make a case for it.  Where's the reliable source that systematically describes and defines artificial controversy qua artifical controversy?  There isn't one cited in the article as it currently stands, and  a dictionary
— User:TedFrank, 16:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYN||WP:NOR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:No original research)