Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Ivy League (2nd nomination)
While it's a ridiculous term, it's clearly in widespread usage as one can see with a quick look through some of the sources and many others not cited.  The article as it currently exists may not be very good but deletion is not the answer.  I caution others against |letting their dislike of the term color their opinion of the article about the term
— User:ElKevbo, 21:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)