Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Walk Networking
Where are you people seeing "verifiablity and notability". Please discuss the sources because no one has backed up anything. There are NO souces at all. Numbers 2 and 3 are merely lists of non profit organisations with this organisation being mentioned in the list, not nobitibility is shown at all here to meet the  standard. The 1st reference does not mention the organisation at all. No other verifiability or assertion of notibility, so it fails  and . Further reading is two newsletters, and the book is only published and distributed locally and does not show any notibility of its own. Is it bad luck for the author it is but Wikipedia has standards because small non notable organisations like this are not encylopedic. To be kept it should haven notable media coverage etc. I did not found any mention when searching QLD newspapers back to 1995
— User:Dacium, 03:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)