Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Score Runoff Voting (2nd nomination)
A trivial variation of range voting with no significant independent reliably-published sourcing (all we have is web sites of dubious significance and reliability), does not pass . The sightline piece in particular is a pamphlet from a partisan group, not a scholarly publication, mentions a different variation (with reweighting), and does so only trivially as a short bullet in a long bulleted list of possibilities.  I see no reason to change my  opinion from last time
— User:David, 20:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)