Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Niter (2nd nomination)
In evaluating the comments, I have responded to each wikipedian's claim with strong evidence in supporting this bodybuilder's article.  I've used good faith to remove parts of the article that others have written that gave the appearance of "promoting" the bodybuilder and inaccurate data.  What I haven't received is the "why" factor.  Why does this bodybuilder not meet .  In my review, I hear "concern" but that doesn't tell me that this bodybuilder isn't notable. I hear that one is not "convinced" but nothing to follow as to why.  Example, one member wrote that their was no news sources in which it was later provided.  I hear things regarding "specifics."  The specifics of any article in Wikipedia should be VERY SPECIFIC and include sources as to challenge anyone in question.  Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article.  I still stand by this bodybuilder as being notable based on  He meets the bar.  The topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
— User:Rniterjr, 09:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)