Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Yuldasheva
AJ has it backwards. We don't default to keep, particularly on BLP articles because we can't find sources to disprove. Nor do we give a pass because it's hard to find sources. If there's an iceberg of sources then at least demonstrate there's something from what's available.I also like the creator's comment: "It seems to be true that Wikipedia is a collection of articles by conservative twenty-somethings who are trying to rewrite history." It's followed by "immediately remove this article from the list of articles to be deleted." That just advertises you're unfamiliar with our policies and how AfD works. Just read the top of the  page and it explains that in most cases the page will be listed here for 7 days.I have no opinion on whether the article should be kept or not. It needs sources however there are a few
— User:Shadowjams, 21:53, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)