Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Joseph Cormier 3
I think Cormier fails .  My reaction is the same as Atama's: the article itself -- the text, the claims made -- demonstrate ''lack'' of notability rather than the reverse.  I'd go even further -- I think the text itself shows that it is preposterous to have an article on him, to the point that it is a discredit to Wikipedia.  Even if we need to invoke IAR on this one, I think it should be deleted.  And if it isn't already apparent: the only (weak) keep vote here that is coming from someone who ''wasn't'' canvassed is Steve Smith's
— User:Nomoskedasticity, 21:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)