Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foresight Institute Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology
I don't think  is an issue for this article. By Jytdog's argument, we should delete the |Featured List, List of Nobel laureates. Sources can be better or worse than others and there is a gray area due to independence, reputation,… so I probably add more than other editors. When a receiving organization reports winning the prize, even if it just repeating the press release, it is imparting information acknowledging receipt. For almost any award, most sources would say, "X won Y prize" and then go on talking about X and what X did. They might use some superlative for the prize. Puffery is easily fixed, usually by deleting the word in question. I have problems with David Gerard's accusations,"… it's ''all'' desperate attempts to puff up its importance, and that of the fringe science in question. Paid fringe advocates repeatedly removing tags…". For me it is: attempts to Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron|rescue with sources, of an evolving fringe science that is now more mainstream, and volunteer advocate of Wikipedia (not sure if I removed tags). I have added a couple more refs (SciAm, newspaper) and will try to find more. At worse, this article should be merged with Foresight Institute
— User:StrayBolt, 20:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SOAP||WP:FL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)