Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Coppens (author)
I have a lot of respect for some of the keep !voters, but so far none of them have come up with sources that meet  or  and the decision should be made on the basis of our criteria for notability on the article as it stands now. The very fact that none of them have been able to find sources is part of the reason that I've decided to !vote at all. As DreamGuy says, delete now per our guidelines with no prejudice for recreation later if sources are found. I realise that the delete !votes are outnumbered, but hopefully this decision will be made on the basis of our guidelines (and please, 'no consensus' shouldn't apply here as that would be - in my opinion, saying our guidelines can be broken on the hope that someone will someday provide sources. The reason AfDs take a week is to allow sources to be found. If they aren't being found, that suggests they may not be there
— User:Dougweller, 08:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)