Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empty idea
It wasn't that I thought you had invented the concept, but that this particular definition of the concept looked like OR, or at least was uncited. (actually, many people '''do''' go to wikipedia for info on gravitation and the like, when the wish info on about the ''Scientific American'' level or a bit lower.) We also get lots of crackpost promoting their own private versions of physics, in fact I think that  was originally created specifically to deal with crackpot physics
— User:DESiegel, 23:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)