Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluoride Action Network
I say they pass, clearly, . Are mentions on other anti-fluoridation sites unnotable because anti-fluoridation is just dumb in your view?    Diversifying sources is better than deleting articles. Will you next want to AfD Water fluoridation controversy itself? An exercise: name an organization dedicated to opposing fluoridation  ''more notable'' than FAN, or does opposing water fluoridation consign one ''ipso facto'' to a deserved obscurity? I'm daring to examine motives here (ordinarily somewhat rude) not because I doubt that you sincerely want to improve the encyclopedia, but because I see zero concern for how properly to represent the topic of opposition to water fluoridation
— User:smaines, 21:34, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)