Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jevon King
There seems to be a wholesale attack on the articles of individual Miss Universe contestants.  Yet they all, individually receive immense courage at the pagent, which is essentially a press event.  As I started looking into this, I found major media, LA Times, Las Vegas Sun, Seattle P/I doing individual photo articles on these contestants during the patent.  Yeah, its not exactly deep investigative journalism to put pretty women in your newspaper, but it doesn't hurt the bottom line.  And there are lots of sites that devote a lot of attention to each nominee.  Her name comes up on sources of varying levels of reliability all over the world right now.  To pick on this one because the pagent hasn't happened yet is a rush technicality.  In track and field where I do the majority of my content, we have virtually unknown athletes place at the national championships qualifying them for a major international championship team.  It would be a ridiculous attack on those athletes in the interim between the qualification and the major press coverage we know they will receive at the championship.  This short sighted attack ignores what she will do later this year.  It is not  because by her current status, even if she were not to actually appear, she would achieve (possibly greater) notability by the coverage of her absence.  And finally, unless the NOM has some greater insight into the press coverage of Trinidad and Tobago than is otherwise stated, are we on the ground there?  What kind of national coverage is she getting, there?  Within that sphere, these are national heroes.  Wholesale, these are bad faith noms and each of these AfDs should be rejected in an equally wholesale fashion
— User:Trackinfo, 20:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CHRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)