Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Face Mitt (2nd nomination)
or '''redirect''' as suggested above (which are perfectly valid contributions to this discussion) - I participated in the DRV discussion and nothing offered there convinced me that this subject is notable. Most of the sources provided thus far are examples of the meme, not explanations of what it is, how it started, etc. Examples without context don't make for very good sources at all - they could hardly be considered "significant coverage". The fact that youtube videos and twitter feeds (obviously not reliable sources) have been included in the source list just make it even harder to wade through to the one or two articles in the list that ''might'' be considered . I'm just not convinced that there's enough of a lasting impact and longevity of coverage to suggest this was more than a flash in the pan during the election. Funny? Sure. |Notable? Not really
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 06:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)