Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOAT Store
The subject does not meet the . It's hard to tell for sure |with this massive list, but with what I've looked for, they're either first party, not reliable, don't mention the subject at all, or mention the subject in a very trivial, passing mention sort of way. Not a single source is third party, reliable, and discussing the subject in significant detail. Not a single third party source is dedicated to the actual GOAT store itself, for example
— User:Sergecross73, 20:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BOMBARD (Wikipedia:Notability)