Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert Dover (2nd nomination)
This isn't a  problem as there's ongoing tabloid coverage of him, it's a  issue. I've noted multiple times at the ongoing deletion review that this page really doesn't show the lasting notability of Mr. Dover, someone whose position in a normal city would not lend itself to notability. This page is being used to effectively cover an ongoing scandal in which he has been involved in  format. The article has served as a  in the past for complaints against his leadership, and is currently covering a minor and ongoing scandal in  format. Per , {{tq|Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives}}. This article does not meet that standard. Nothing has changed since October, and this article should be salted if and until a completely neutral, doxproof version of the article can be created
— User:SportingFlyer, 15:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)