Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwyer function
Fails ,  and possibly even OR. There are no sources in recognized and established scholarly publications that use the term "Dwyer function" in relation to this function or that mention this function by any other name. The term appears to be used only in two papers by Dwyer posted at the Algana Associates websitehttp://www.algana.co.uk/Research/research.html, which is associated with Dwyerhttp://www.algana.co.uk/HistoryofComputingGroup/HistoryofComputingGroup.htm. The website has no other papers posted, no editorial board, no refereeing procedure, no editorial statement and no submission procedure posted. No hits in GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Algana+Associates%22&hl=en&lr=, WebOfScience or Scopus for anything to do with Algana Associates. So the two Algana Associates articles are essentially self-published and do not pass . The subject of the article also fails . There is no indication that the name "Dwyer function" in relation to this function is widely accepted or even widely used in the scientific community. In fact, apart from a few false positives, GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Dwyer%20function%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws and WebOfScience return zero hits in relation to the "Dwyer function". Even the plain Google searchhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Dwyer+function%22&btnG=Search returns only 32 hits, most of which are false positives
— User:Nsk92, 01:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:N||WP:NOR||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Verifiability)