Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vector (Gibbs-Heaviside)
It appears that there is no such thing as a "Gibbs-Heaviside vector".  http://www.google.com/search?q=%22GIbbs-Heaviside+vector%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 This google search returns 91 results, but excluding the obvious cases "Gibbs-Heaviside vector analysis" and "Gibbs-Heaviside vector algebra" yields http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Gibbs-Heaviside+vector%22+-%22GIbbs-Heaviside+vector+analysis%22+-%22vector+algebra%22&btnG=Search only 6 hits, one of which is to the Wikipedia page, and for the others "Gibbs-Heaviside vector" is a modifier on some other word, such as "calculus" or "cross product" (which was actually invented by Lagrange, but I digress).  Since the term "Gibbs-Heaviside vector" to refer to an actual type of vector appears to have been invented by this article, the article clearly needs to rethink its choice of nomenclature as it relies exclusively on a  and a rather idiosyncratic view of history
— User:Silly, 20:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEOLOGISM (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)