Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 2017 Brussels attack
that  I have now added 2 academic articles to the page. in addition to a number of news articles.  Nom's assertion that coverage was limited to "the same story was repeated for a few days in late June" is absolutely ''wrong.''  As is Nom's interpretation of .  While it is true that an event with LASTING impact "is likely to be notable."  and that as per : "Events are probably notable if... they have a significant lasting effect." It is equally true that as per  that: "It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable." This bombing of a major European train station meets  ,  (although it only happened three months ago,) and  - the standards that actually apply to a high profile crime that just happened
— User:E, 15:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:HEYMANN||WP:LASTING||WP:EVENTCRITERIA||WP:LASTING||WP:INDEPTH||WP:COVERAGE||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:DIVERSE (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)