Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frances M. Vega
At Wikipedia we have a decades' long policy that |local consensus doesn't trump Wikipedia |community consensus. Any group of editors can write an essay for others to read but, when used in DN discussions, essays are nothing more than local consensus. Essays are so low in the Consensus totem pole that the  policy itself picks on them by name (''"no more status than an essay"''). So, no, essays not only do not compare to  but, in fact, to even use the two in the same DN argument shows a gross misunderstanding of what drives Wikipedia. As such, the  essay isn't worth a dime here, and the guide that matters here is  and, more precisely, , the guideline for notability of biographies
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CONLIMITED||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:PG||WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Consensus)