Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Monastir (1917)
to Battle of the Cerna Bend (1917).  I agree with the others that the article's content should be deleted in light of the failure to satisfy  and the general untrustworthiness of the unreferenced material.  However, it is my view that the article itself should be preserved as a redirect.  A fresh search turned up two additional sources.  One applies the label "the second battle of Monastir" (9-14 May 1917)" to this engagement (http://books.google.com/books?id=HGIyl-gI6bkC&pg=PA7&dq=battle+Monastir+May+1917) and the other describes how "The second battle of Bitola, also known as the second battle of the Cherna Bend, began on 5 May 1917..." http://books.google.com/books?id=lVJ3BwKa9wMC&pg=PA87&dq=Bitola+1917+May. ("Monastir" was the name of the city during Ottoman times; by the outbreak of WWI, it was also known under the alternate name Bitola so "Battle of Bitola" and "Battle of Monastir" are just different labels for the same event.)  These sources demonstrate that "Battle of Monastir (1917)" is a valid alternate descriptor for the "Battle of the Cerna Bend" and hence a potential search term.  WP already Battle of the Cerna Bend (1917)|has an article on this battle which is a logical redirect destination.  Moreover, redirects are cheap (
— User:Mike, 17:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CHEAP (Wikipedia:Notability)