Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piña, Darién
as it does not meet the |general notability guideline that all articles must pass, having ''"significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"''.  To re-iterate Hrafn above, determinations of outcomes are determined not by wiktionary:consensus but by Wikipedia:Consensus, and guideline Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators is relevent here, and in particular it's advice on determining Wikipedia:ROUGH_CONSENSUS#Rough_consensus|rough consensus: ''"Consensus is not determined by counting heads, but by looking at strength of argument, and underlying policy (if any)."'' It's also worth noting that the header on the top of this very page directs all contributors to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_discuss_an_AfD, says to make recomendations "sustained by arguments," and another linnked from that bar Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines to cite in deletion debates says clearly that "''if an essay is used to support deletion or to keep an article proposed for deletion, a good explanation should be given as to why one believes it supports his/her case''.  Thus, to those who'd like to keep this article, please provide multiple instances of signifigant coverage in |reliable sources
— User:Aaron, 23:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)