Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing (2nd nomination)
because there are insufficient |reliable independent sources to write a verifiably  article. This is important because Explore, probably more than any other journal published by a mainstream company, is a platform for abject nonsense. A journal that can publish a paper on the medicinal efficacy of chocolate imbued with "intent" has completely lost any connection to the scientific method, and indeed the editor has described the teaching of science as tantamount to child abuse. He repudiates the scientific method., Thus, we can't have an article based solely on the self-description provided by the publisher, we absolutely must have solid reliable and above all ''independent'' sources. Most of the reality-based world imply ignores this journal. You won't find editorials in the NEJM saying that despite the latest paper in Explore, distant healing is still bullshit. Psychologists have come to the conclusion that Emotional Freedom Techniques is nonsense, the fact that advocates publish favourable papers in Explore won't change that and they won't comment on the journal that publishes those favourable results because it's ignorable. I have only found one source to date that comes anywhere close to  that actually talks about this journal, rather than one of its editors
— User:JzG, 18:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)