Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pear Cable Audio Cables (2nd nomination)
on notability.  I would like to politely urge people to consider the notability requirement in  very carefully.  Multiple independent non-trivial writings must be referenced.  It cannot be argued that the sources that are provided are independent.  There are definitely multiple sources provided.  Non-trivial is really the only remaining hurdle to clear.  In describing what IS trivial,  says that a media reprint of a press release is trivial.  None of the sources provided are reprints of press releases (This cannot be questioned if they articles are examined).  The other examples given of trivial sources, are "newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories".  The sources provided are significantly more notable than an extended shopping hours note.  Really the only thing left is whether or not the sources themselves are trivial.  Again, I believe that the sources provided easily pass this hurdle.  People who know the automotive industry know who SEMA is.  People into high-end audio know who Positive Feedback online is, and VideoHiFi is yet another prolific audio review publication that while lesser known in the US, is well known in Itlay.  The examples given in  for notable sources are "Palo Alto Weekly" and "Many people" who "have published their own accounts of eating there".  I have never heard of "Palo Alto Weekly", but that does not make it trivial.  The other examples given for a restaurant suggest that just an individual publishing a restaurant review should qualify
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:CORP||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)