Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun School 6
of ''Fun School 6'' to Fun School if Fun School can be improved (or to Europress per Czar). As Czar points out, only significant coverage in reliable |''third party'' sources can be used to demonstrate notability. So even though manuals and other ''self-published'' sources may be sufficiently reliable to cite in an article they still don't demonstrate that it meets |the basic notability threshold. The existence of old paper-copy sources for the other Fun School games is the reason my !vote is tentative. If additional sourcing can be located sufficient to demonstrate notability then I'd change to "keep
— NONE, NONE
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:THIRDPARTY||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)