Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Charlie's prostitution of a child
That this article passes  seems obvious to me. The national interest in this event is not impinged upon because external reporters were not sent in for additional coverage; what is relevant is that several of Canada's most major news outlets decided that readers across Canada would want to read a full article on the subject of this event.  is not relevant to this case; the closest thing that  guards against is articles based solely on crime logs, which this article clearly is not. There isn't anything else in  that suggests that we should ignore the applicability of  in this case. As has been amply demonstrated above,  is not relevant to this article as this article is not a biography but is about the event itself. Because a significant number of the "delete" comments above cite one of these inapplicable guidelines, and because of the canvassing concerns raised above, I would urge the closing administrator to be especially judicious in weighing the arguments and not the number of !votes on either side
— User:Neelix, 17:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:EVENT||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)