Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiquidSky
This feels like an article about an announcement of the service, in other words,  and fails . It's all rehashed PR blurbs and quotes, basically a whole lot of . But the number of references from reputable sources, such as /RS and broader, is numerous. It feels , but I'm sure more sources actually dealing with the product itself will appear once it's released and reviewed. If it's a flop and no one ever comments on it again, I would revisit the AfD and argue for deletion due to failing . —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 17:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEVENT||WP:LASTING||WP:PRIMARY||WP:VG||WP:TOOSOON||WP:LASTING (Wikipedia:Notability)