Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Campaign For Life
Both users who have voted keep seem to not understand the policy of |assuming good faith. As they are new around here, I shall explain quickly. This means that we assume all users, whatever their personal beliefs, are voting with the best of intentions and not in an attempt at a smear campaign. This is one of the most fundamental policies of Wikipedia. Another fundamental policy of Wikipedia, and the most fundamental part of the decision to keep or delete an article, is the concept of otability|notability as |verified in |reliable, independent sources. Unlike the articles on such groups as Focus on the Family or Birthright, this group has no otability|significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Thus, they are unfit for inclusion. In the future, I suggest all users try harder to PA|stick to content, not contributors in their comments
— User:VanTucky, 21:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NPA (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)