Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hockey stick controversy
In most cases, the existence of articles about "X" and "X controversy" means that the "controversy" is covered in  detail, and I don't see any reasons to believe that this case is any different. My layperson's understanding is that the hockey stick graph is a representation of mainstream climate science, and the "controversy" is an aspect of climate change denial, which is important as an economic and political force, but is fringe or fake science. In the context of this scientific topic, therefore, covering the supposed "controversy" at great length violates , and the fact that the undue detail has been spun off into a separate article does not change that
— User:Sandstein, 19:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)