Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilmington Montessori School
elementary schools really need to be exceptional, not just a good school (which I'm sure this one is). Obviously the author's counterargument 1) is of the |What about X? variety. Even if there are other notable elementary schools, that does not affect this one, and even if there are non-notable schools with articles, that does not affect this one. Counterargument 2) is more of a comment on the nominator's tone, but obviously saying there are many Montessori schools is not a criticism. There are many Montessori schools, a testament to their success. Counterargument 3) amounts to a claim that "one of the largest" schools is notable, which is debatable, but difficult to prove in any case. Being accredited and complying with the code are base expectations for such schools and not any indicator of notability. Counterargument 4) again invokes accreditations, but these too are not ''notability'' as such is available to many schools. Counterargument 5) involves the notability of a teacher, which may or may not exist, but in any case is not directly transferable to the school
— User:Dhartung, 05:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WAX (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)