Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Zappelli
As I already noted on the article's talk page the first time this was attempted, Wikipedia does ''not'' give article subjects the right to ''veto'' our having of an article about them. In the case of a low-profile figure whose notability claim and sourceability aren't particularly strong, we can take the subject's wishes into ''consideration'' under  — but even then, there still have to be other reasons why the article might be deletable ''besides'' the subject's own wishes alone. And a person who has a ''clean'' pass of an inclusion criterion, such as a high profile state-level holder of a notable political office, ''definitely'' gets no special rights to control the existence of an article about him. If there are neutrality or BLP issues here, they can be resolved through the normal editing process — but Zappelli does ''not'' get to unilaterally decree ''himself'' off limits as an article topic
— User:Bearcat, 22:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIODEL (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)