Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon items
per , which suggests that content on minor characters, places, and concepts should be included in a list that is separate from the article if it becomes too long.  Regarding  a game guide, statements in this article should ''describe'' the objects in question; they should not give tips as to how to use them.  The use of game guides as references does not automatically make this article a game guide itself, just as the use of news sources does not make an article news, and the use of government reports does not make an article such a report.  This is how I see it from a WP-policy standpoint.  I have never directly dealt with anything Pokemon-related (except on WP), so I can't comment as to how "major" or "minor" these objects/concepts are.  Please correct me if I'm making some erroneous assumption regarding what these objects in fact are.  However, even if minor, I believe the content qualifies for inclusion
— User:Black, 02:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FICT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)