Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saki Hatsumi
for lack of notability (|DEL8). The subject fails GNG as the available coverage, including that presented here, is more trivial than significant. This point is illustrated (but obviously not proved, ''cf.'' |NEXIST) by the fact that, despite apparent editor interest, the article gives absolutely nothing of substance about the subject.Neither of the Adult Broadcasting Awards, despite receiving regular and routine coverage, is a "well known and significant industry award" as contemplated by |PORNBIO point 1. Even if the subject met PORNBIO, which she doesn't, she so clearly fails |BASIC that PORNBIO doesn't apply: PORNBIO, like BIO's other additional criteria, is to be used in mine run debates, where notability is plausible, not to find notability where it is plainly lacking. ''Cf.'' #Additional criteria|BIO § Additional criteria ("Meeting one or more additional criteria does not guarantee that a subject should be included."); otability|otability § Why we have these requirements
— User:Rebbing, 20:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DEL8||WP:NEXIST||WP:PORNBIO||WP:BASIC||WP:BIO||WP:N (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)