Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Konstantin (2nd nomination)
even if every word is true, this person fails to meet  and . Much of the information is |badly sourced, or |unsourced. The rest are |claims of notability by association or |vague generalities. This seems to be a great guy, but |his work was ordinary in the big scheme of things. If reviews of his ''Dummy'' or other books could be found from major sources, then I'd change my mind
— User:Bearian, 17:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:WEASEL||WP:MILL (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)