Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sexual slang
why is no reason given for re-nomination?  It was voted on like 2 weeks ago with a quite high ratio of keeps.  Anyway like it or not there are lots of lists of jargon/slang/technical terms on Wikipedia, for example List of baseball jargon.  As long as they're well organized and useful, I don't see the problem.  It's just when the subject is sex or something controversial that people start to look for excuses to delete such lists.  Until consensus is to delete all slang/jargon/terms lists changes, I can't see deleting just certain ones for subjective personal reasons, under the thin excuse of arguably breaking 
— User:W, 23:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)