Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashmiri descent from lost tribes of Israel
but, if kept, '''strong support for re-name''' - the title is rubbish and just lends to suggestions that the whole thing is either  or a . I accept that it might not be - there certainly seems to be references to support the suggestion that the ''theory'' exists. I'm not convinced it is so widespread a theory (in the scholarly study sense) that the subject deserves an article. The most substantive source supporting the theories in question is from David Hatcher Childress, an "alternative historian" and "historical revisionist" who "claims no academic credentials as a professional archaeologist nor in any other scientific field of study". Whether the other sources are enough to establish notability of the theory itself, any version of the article that doesn't describe it as a |fringe theory is, in my opinion, not accurately reflecting the available sources. It's a fringe theory from a fringe theorist who writes about it in his non-scholarly book without referencing any facts, sources or primary material. The fact that others have bought into the theory means it might pass notability tests for inclusion but if it is kept it should be described for what it is
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]], 00:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:HOAX||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:No original research)