Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharma Bells
The article isn't encyclopedic in tone but the topic is encyclopedic. It could be stubified or perhaps merged to Emil Richards for the moment, but deletion is not the best way forward, and will just lead to more recreation. The solution is to develop good coverage of the topic(s). Disagree that it's purely part of a ''spam cluster'', but there are definitely possible COI issues that nobody seems to have addressed, remembering  (diffs please if there have been attempts I've missed). Happy to work with the contributor(s) to resolve the issues
— User:Andrewa, 23:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)