Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Railsback (3rd nomination)
The analysis about  is spot on and in any case it doesn't pass . GNG is not a free pass to an article - it is a guideline which needs to be seen in context of  as well as . We need to exclude sources with tangential coverage as notability cannot be inherited. http://www.newsweek.com/miss-usa-pageant-draws-less-38000-online-viewers-352963 This source for example cannot be used for GNG purposes because the article is about the event with a tangential mention of the subject. This is not significant coverage. (in contrast, an article about the subject with a tangential mention of the event would be useful). I'm also cautious about using local sources for GNG purposes because they tend to give disproportionate coverage to local events. Using local sources would make a whole lot of people "notable" which precisely goes against DIR. The way I see it, the subject has received some coverage for being crowned Miss Kansas USA but the rest of coverage is tangential. BIO1E, so I am OK with a delete or redirect to Miss Kansas USA
— User:Lemongirl942, 10:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO1E||WP:GNG||WP:NOT||WP:NOPAGE||WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:Notability)