Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Nicholson
based on . This was not as clear-cut a case as I expected; I'm basing it on Special:PermaLink/897872177|this revision, as noted above, which had 22 footnotes. It does not appear to me that there is enough coverage from independent reliable sources focused on Nicholson herself. Please note, I'm not arguing that this is a grey area in which we should act in accordance with her preferences; rather, it seems to me that regardless of the request, this is a subject that does not meet our guidelines for inclusion. It's possible that I'm missing something; a well-formed "keep" vote would need to include a list of several |reliable sources, with significant focus on her (as opposed to merely quoting her). The quotes-as-an-expert help, but in the absence of anything besides the ''Washington Post'' article that are substantially about her or her work or focus on her beyond a short quotation, and in strong publications, this should be a "delete
— User:Peteforsyth, 00:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PERSON||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)