Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syagrus atricolor
I'm generally one of those who point to , and I don't see a problem with, eventually, having an article for every species ever recognized. However, just about any other case that has come up so far has had at least a few items of interest connected with the species; this one just seems randomly obscure (and as Plantdrew acutely notes above, may have surfaced from obscurity merely to be reclassified in the near future). As such it really is testing the boundaries of what is , after all, not a binding rule re notability. {{u|Rubbish computer}}, can you maybe comment on what prompted you to create the article in the first place
— User:Elmidae, 07:31, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)