Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ra (channeled entity)
The article is not about the book, it is about the channeled entity. How can  be the reason for deletion for this article? All point of views including critics (significant or not) can be stated if there is any. Lack of other point of views or critical material (significant or not) does not violate , as it states that "all significant views that have been published by reliable sources should be represented fairly, and as far as possible without bias, by a neutral point of view, while writing articles for wikipedia". It does not state any course of action in case of non-existence of critical material. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Cultural_artifacts and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Paranormal_as_an_effective_tag draw attention to how these kind of articles should be treated. Even in the case that  criteria is the basis, again the article does not violate 1st criteria http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BK#Criteria as it is just a simple plot summary. Since it the article has not grow grown past a simple plot summary yet, significant critical material is not needed for its current state
— User:Logos5557, 19:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BK||WP:NPOV||WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)