Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Rezab
I'll get to Rezab's comments in a second, but only in extreme cases should an article be deleted based on intent. In this case, sources do not meet notability guidelines, and are mostly flimsy PR and churnalism used as . Many of the sources don't even mention Rezab at all. The ''Forbes'' thing is puff. It's a listicle which is widely abused to suggest notability, but is a very poor indicator. It's divided into 20 subcategories, making for 600 entries a year, and reliable comments about the list itself are thin. The article could be used as a source itself, but it says almost nothing. Just mentioning the listing is not informative, and further supports that this is based more on self-promotion than being neutral and informative
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BOMBARDMENT (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)