Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jobie Hughes
The guy is a ghostwriter who got fired by James Frey, and whose name never even appeared on any of the books packaged by Frey.  Is this what passes now for  and ? Surely not.  Yes, he did manage to publish one book under his own name, but it immediately tanked.  Is ''that'' what passes now for  or ?  Again, the answer is no.  Everyone should read the guidelines carefully.  Otherwise, every non-notable ghostwriter who's gone on to publish non-notable work under his own name will be demanding an article.  Also, editors who might try to argue that he is indeed notable for the one book he wrote under his own name should note ''that the article for that book has already been deleted from Wikipedia.''  You can read the deletion discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/At_Dawn_(novel).  This appears to be the case of a person who thought that we would forget about all of this, wrongly imagining that he could sneak back here the following year and recreate some of the same non-notable material.  But there are editors who've kept this stuff on their watchlists for a long, long time, and for good reason
— User:Qworty, 20:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)