Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klefki
to List of generation VI Pokémon#Klefki. This is a shining example of where "counting sources" for notability falls flat. Where is the substance? In each of the above sources, the article is either itself an attempt at humor, a passing mention, or game guide material (how to do X in a game). With what overabundance of sourcing are we going to write an entire encyclopedia article that does justice to this topic? All we can extract from this content is a series of unserious quotes from a glut of clickbait that we could string together into a very lackluster Reception paragraph. There is enough video game journalism coverage that we can afford a modicum of discernment that, "Every Pokemon is interesting and worth talking about. I don’t play a ton of Pokemon, but I do enjoy the universe and I love learning more about the creatures in it. So, Here’s Another Pokemon! It’s Klefki!"https://kotaku.com/klefki-will-steal-your-keys-and-never-give-them-back-1836710679 is an admission of randomness, not of the topic's |independent notability. If all readers need to know about this character is that journalists think it's a joke, that's a single sentence to cite within the existing list's notes section (as has already been done
— [[User talk:Czar|czar]], 09:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:42||WP:42 (Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything)