Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freenom
u|Shritwod}}, of the above sources, only the quartz one is any good. The World trademark review source is behind a paywall, so I have no way of identifying how in depth the coverage is, but appears to be routine coverage of legal proceedings. Both of the scmagazineuk.com sources seem to be trivial mentions within stories about other stuff, and so do not contribute to notability. The quartz article is more like what we are looking for to establish notability, but that is only one source, and we require multiple good ones. Searching for other coverage of the .tk domain finds quite a few sources that just barely mention Freenom http://www.zdnet.com/article/why-the-us-is-dwarfed-by-tiny-tokelau-what-the-online-world-looks-like-without-com/. However, there are other sources for the company's older name; CNN's coverage of the company and Zuubier would probably work http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/13/tech/web/tokelau-domain-name-holder/index.html, though they call it 'Freedom registry', which was the old name for the company. One issue is that all of this coverage isn't really about Freenom or the Freedom registry, despite containing significant coverage of the company, the stories are about the .tk domain. {{u|TonyBallioni}} was the first to redirect this article to .tk, and I still agree that is a good solution, but should include a merger as well. Per , the above sourcing does seem to be enough to establish notability though, if barely, so I guess I'll change my !vote to keep, but a merger is also a good solution
— User:Insertcleverphrasehere, 01:55, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)