Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zane B. Stein
Despite  and , and a substantial amount of puffery and misrepresentation of sources, none of the sources proferred even come close to qualifying as a reliable source according to our policies. The subject has been totally ignored by everyone outside of a small segment of the fringe community. No relaible sources means no article. Personal correspondence and mention in  "for entertainment purposes" fringe sources does nothing to establish general notability. The subjects own claims for notability above are far from convincing. Still have not turened up anything reliable sources in my own searches, and still think the article should be deleted
— User:Dominus, 04:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LOTSOFSOURCES||WP:GOOGLEHITS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)