Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Par
Having gone over the article's history, I found it was the work of a sole contributor (others were established users performing maintenance and tagging) . Now while I think any editor w/ his prosaic skill should be retained, I am troubled by the use he put his skills to and by the fact that this is the 4rth iteration of an article on a subject that does not meet the  and whose purpose seems promotional. I still think it should be ed
— User:Dlohcierekim, 19:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SALT (Wikipedia:Notability)