Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanna Bonta (3rd nomination)
That there are major promotional and verification issues in this article is obvious, and the ''vast'' majority of sources cited within it are either not independent or secondary (and thus not useful for establishing |notability in particular) or are simply not |reliable sources for use on Wikipedia in general.  Those sources and the many (often dubious or not terribly encyclopedic) claims which they support should be removed.   All of that being said, there remains a small core of useful and acceptable sources which do establish a level of notability sufficient to support the article.  But good luck to whoever has to wrangle the content into consistency with our policies
— User:Snow, 00:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)