Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the War on Terror
In general I oppose POVFORKs because they are so regularly used as a way to hide or wall off legitimate criticism of organizations and institutions.  In this case, it is justified by the length of both articles.  That said, it's a lousy article, dealing as it does with only certain kinds of criticism, it lacks, to give just one example, a section on the sizable and serious critiques of American strategy and tactics being made by military analysts on grounds of ineffectiveness.  It might also be interesting to have something on the campaign-related upsurge of right wing (Trump) and left wing (Sanders) isolationist critiques of the "War."   There is also an inappropriate POV tone to much of the writing, it is, for example, usual on such pages to discuss "Allegations of Hypocrisy..." Rather than assert Hypocrisy of the... in a  subhead.  That said, even highly biased s can pass notability.  This topic does
— User:E, 16:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:Content forking)