Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge F. Zeballos
or '''Redirect''' to Seventy (LDS Church). Even religious organizations and members have to pass .  Church sources are absolutely usable for finding good information about the subject ''if notability is already established''. But  is clear about independence. Coverage in official LDS publications such as ''Church News'' or the ''Ensign'' does not establish notability for church leaders, any more than an in-house magazine for a large corporation covering the appointment of a vice-president would establish notability for that corporate employee. The comparisons to Catholic bishops are inaccurate. The Catholic Church has over a billion adherents worldwide vs. about 16 million for LDS. A more accurate comparison would be between LDS and the Seventh-day Adventist Church. And even Catholic bishops are not automatically notable, though AfD discussions typically find they meet the notability guidelines, according to . Of course it is possible that Wikipedia guidelines are biased against denominations whose leaders do not get significant attention outside the church. One alternative would be to redirect the individual article to the higher-level entity that is already accepted as notable, and discuss the individual there. For this article that would mean a redirect to Seventy (LDS Church), which I would also support, but it looks like the subject is not currently mentioned as one of the noteworthy members in that article
— User:Bakazaka, 07:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:IIS||WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES (Wikipedia:Notability)