Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Litter in the United States
I split it from the litter article to avoid |systemic bias issues. The article has some references and lack of any referencing concerns can be resolved by adding a {{tl:fact}} tag or adding refs. Lack of referencing is not a valid reason for deletion. With regards to POV I feel it is no more POV than any other articles such as Environmental issues in the United States, Climate change in New Zealand etc. As for being an unlikely search term I would argue that it is ''exactly'' the sort of term that would be used to search for such information.  If the info if merged back into the litter article or elsewhere we will be back to systemic bias issues. Also, if it were to be merged back it will have to be split out at some point in the future since WP is always growing in size. Should we also merge the Litter in the United Kingdom and Litter in New Zealand in other articles? There is much systemic bias in WP that makes WP US-centric
— User:Alan, 07:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CSB (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)