Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jin Wang Kim
Joungok, it would be better for you to add these references to the article in a neat, orderly way than to just keep throwing them at our heads here. I still don't think Jin Wang Kim meets our standards for an article, but if there is anything in all the references you're giving us here, on this AfD page, that would change anyone's mind, we will never find it. There is just too much here, and it is presented in too disorganized a way. To speak directly, no one here is going to take the time to sort through all of the poorly formatted links you're giving us here. You need to present them in an orderly way that makes it easy for your fellow editors to verify them. That's what ''articles'' are for. This process should continue another four or five days; that will give you time to try to add meaningful, |reliable references to the article, to try to make your case that Dr. Kim is |notable. Again, I think that will probably be wasted effort; I doubt he is notable, as we all use that word here. But arguing with each new vote here, with new links for every one, is not going to work. Put them in the article if they're useful, and then come back here and ask us to take another look. &nbsp;–&nbsp
— User:Ohiostandard, 07:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RELY||WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)