Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hobgoblin (Dungeons & Dragons)
The D&D specific version of the creature does not have any sort of coverage in reliable, secondary sources that would allow it to pass the .  There are plenty of results that establish that, yes, , but nothing that would support an independent article.  The only sources being used currently are game books and primary sources.  Merging to hobgoblin, per Cas Liber, ''could'' be possible, but given the utter lack of reliable sources, I would not recommend it.  It should probably be noted that the multitude of "Keep" votes above are entirely , and should be discounted appropriately, and I find it weird that so many people continue to try this tactic
— User:Rorshacma, 16:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ITEXISTS||WP:JUSTAVOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)