Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exomissiology
Wikipedia is |not a dictionary for terms that happen to be used obscurely in two theology journals. When there are |third-party independent sources that discuss this term in a rigorous and comprehensive way, then Wikipedia should include it
— User:ScienceApologist, 14:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:PSTS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)