Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyall Howard (2nd nomination)
I don't really see any notability.  In reference to lester's statement, 1 is left up for debate (don't know if that's notable), I see no evidence of malice for 2 (and tend to |assume good faith nevertheless), 3 is sheer speculation and therefore unnotable, and 4, as per  (explained above is not notable.  5, quoth you, "may have" had effects on his son's upbringing - "may have" is, again, sheer speculation, and I'm not sure that, if conclusively the answer was yes, it would apply, in any event
— User:Dennisthe2, 05:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)