Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Daniel Chilcott
Ontario Superior Court of Justice is certainly a level of judgeship at which a person ''could'' be includable if they actually had adequate |reliable source coverage to clear , but it is ''not'' "inherently" notable enough to entitle him to an automatic notability freebie on primary sourcing alone. And no, even being treasurer of the law society still isn't "inherently" notable enough to waive our sourcing rules either. Notability is not measured in terms of the things the article ''says'', it's measured in terms of the quality, depth and reliability of the ''sourcing'' that can or can't be shown to ''support'' the things it says
— User:Bearcat, 17:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)