Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish family law
The subject is obviously worthy.  ''This'' is a non-article that essentially says that Scottish family law is the family law of Scotland - tautology (rhetoric)|no shit, Sherlock!  The rationale of the nominator seems flawed; the family law of Tonga is also a worthy subject, awaiting someone who has access to the appropriate sources to write one.As an article that contains little more than a noninformative sentence and a template, it would appear to fall under several categories for #A1|speedy #A4|deletion.  The question seems to boil down to whether a redlink to an encyclopedia subject is more encouraging to editors who want to start a new article there than a blue link to an empty article waiting to be filled.  I think the redlink is the better option.  A bluelink suggests that the rudiments of a subject have already been addressed, and here they have not been.  The template looks fine and dandy.  But if there are gaps in our coverage of these subjects, it should be obvious from looking at it
— User:Ihcoyc, 15:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CSD||WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)