Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Crayola marker colors
If a reliable source existed for such a list then that would make the article unnecessary as we could just refer to that. Also, listcruft would still apply. The bigger problem is that this isn't even referenced to such an external source. The one "reference" is a list of colours on the Crayola site which does not give any clue which are marker colours (as opposed to crayon colours) or what dates they were issued. The article is completely unverifiable. It could be almost completely made up for all we know. The Hex values are either made up or sampled out of the website in an act of |original research. Some of the other Crayola colour articles are referenced, although I'm not sure how reliable their sources are either. This effectively isn't referenced at all. I see no hope for it
— User:DanielRigal, 22:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)