Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bowles (4th nomination)
It's simple: does this guy meet ? The guideline tells us to consider "the depth of coverage" - and the additional sources seem to mention Bowles in a line or two, at most. I still don't see that he's been the subject of ''non-trivial'' coverage in "secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." He is not automatically notable just because his firm is - see . The prior AfD's have not generated a consensus (they've all been closed as "no consensus", not "keep"), so relisting is not as inappropriate as some of the above comments suggest
— User:MastCell, 15:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Notability)