Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Wimmer Presents
I believe with established references from the New York Times, Sacramento Bee and Pollstar, notability is not what is now being questioned, but rather the correct sourcing, documentation and objectivity of the article. I would agree that it is a good idea to  this to be worked on until it is ready to be submitted to an administrator for approval. I want to work with the community to make sure content that is making it to article space is purely neutral and objective
— User:Spuderman, 18:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:USERFY (Wikipedia:Userfication)