Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Stone
As a subtle point, I disagree that one must be active at university to be judged on the basis of  (as the numerous articles on long-deceased or retired academics and scientists demonstrate). That being said, it appears her academic credentials are minimal. The WoS query "AUTHOR: (stone k*) Refined by: ORGANIZATIONS-ENHANCED: (UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE) Timespan: All years. Indexes: SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, BKCI-S, BKCI-SSH" shows 7 papers, none of which seem to be from Stone. Sources seem instead to focus on the sensationalism of Stone's transgender. I think the basic question is whether we can have a BLP based essentially on the transgenderism of an individual. I think not, since it is not notable ''per se
— User:Agricola44, 15:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)