Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three-check chess
noting that all of the content that is presently in the stand-alone article is probably fair game for merger, as it's not a terribly excessive amount of information.  Even if we ignore for the moment that this article is unsourced and fails  (no, a set of rules posted on a website are not RS for the purposes of establishing otability), this would still be a pretty straightforward OPAGE/ analysis, as I see it
— User:Snow, 04:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:NOPAGE||WP:SUMMARYSTYLE (Wikipedia:Notability)