Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Lehrer
per Shyamal's research and per Eric Yurken's original reasoning, which still seems sound to me.  Not every taxonomical classification imparts notability to the taxonomist;  requires peer recognition of a greater sort than has been demonstrated here.  If, indeed, Lehrer is a Galileo unappreciated by modern science, well, 22nd-century Wikipedia can celebrate his sacrifice and curse our ignorance.  Willing to change my mind if Frank Pais can show me more notability than currently exists in an article consisting entirely of  and , but simply having a publication record doesn't confer notability to me
— User:THF, 15:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:OR||WP:PUFF (Wikipedia:Notability)