Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noynoying
per Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Inclusion criteria, , and . Specifically: "A rule of thumb for creating a Wikipedia article is whether the event is of lasting, historical significance, and the scope of reporting (national or global reporting is preferred)." The term itself was coined only a few days ago. Too soon to even judge if the term is notable (I've never even heard of it until now). No this is not at all like Jejemon. I am not fond of Noynoy, nor ''any'' of our presidents for that matter, but this should be treated as under the terms of . It's an attack page after all with a great deal of POV thrown in. We'd be unduly legitimizing it by having an article on it just a few days after it was coined by the perpetual activists in the NCR region. So, '''wait'''. If the term survives after, say, six months, then I have no objections to adding it. But right now, it stinks of propaganda.--&nbsp
— User:Obsidian, 14:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)