Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid
This article is well sourced and written very well. It complies with  and with . The nominator's rationale (at least the ones that are not attacking the editors) have been taken care of. Specially the quotes and such. Also, please note that AFP, Reuters and BBC are not the only Realiable sources. There are plenty more RS that exist out there and the arguments that say that this article is not cited by RS is baseless. Note that it is not a violation of  when an article has over 20 reference and EVERY SINGLE claim is backed by references. I honostly believe that people accusing this article of violating  themself are breaching just that
— User:Watchdogb, 20:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:NOR||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)