Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Day (2nd nomination)
Not necessarily because of the subject's notability, but mainly because the current version of this article is almost identical to the one that was deleted last October following rticles for deletion/Alex Day|this AfD discussion (probably the most thorough of the ''four'' previous discussions on this person). http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alex_Day&diff=449395232&oldid=390092540 The only real changes to the article since then seem to be the addition of links to some YouTube pages (which aren't reliable sources) and general mos fixes. Very little of the actual content of the article has changed, therefore the arguments favouring deletion back then are all still valid now. I have http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alex_Day&oldid=447148617#Edit_request_from_MarcusBritish,_28_August_2011 previously espoused how I think that, if the article ''does'' exist, it needs to be written in chronological order so as to make the most logical sense to an uninformed reader. Basically, I guess what I'm saying is that this particular article should be deleted per  and maybe  (which I know are technically criteria for ''speedy'' deletion, but I still think they're relevant here). Thanks
— User:A, 22:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:G4||WP:G11 (Wikipedia:Attribution)