Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Henry Williams (baseball)
WP:NOTINHERITED is not applicable here because the subject has received coverage for his own actions and certainly substantial coverage way beyond what the typical child of a baseball player - even a Hall of Fame baseball player - achieves.  And I don't understand the basis for the comment in the nomination that he "clearly fails ," since the subject has been covered in numerous articles.  Many of those involved the Alcor controversy, so  could be argued, but I don't see any of the specific elements of BLP1E actually applying here, let alone all of them.  In particular, with respect to criterion 1, there are reliable sources covering other aspects of the subject, such as his abortive baseball career, his business dealings and his death, for example, http://www4.whdh.com/features/articles/hank/H9/ http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/williams/2002-07-12-son.htm http://www.sptimes.com/2004/03/08/Tampabay/Son_of_baseball_star_.shtml http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20020627/NEWS/206270521 http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1346&dat=20020711&id=Ar8wAAAAIBAJ&sjid=-v0DAAAAIBAJ&pg=6558,9685 http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=willia012joh (some of these of course touch his his Alcor role, which was his most prominent claim to fame, but also address the other topics).  With respect to criterion 2, he was not a "low profile" individual.  And with respect to #3, his role in Alcor was substantial.  On #3 one might argue that the Alcor controversy was not significant enough - although it generated substantial press coverage - but even if he fails #3, BLP1E would require failing all three criteria, not just one of them
— User:Rlendog, 15:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)