Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Myth of National Defense
|The notability guideline for books gives some basic guidance on what we should be looking for.  Reviews are largely insufficient to generate notability for books since ''most'' books are reviewed by some body or another.  If a broad swath of newspapers and journals decide to review a book, then more of a case can be made.  In the case of a "popular book", we could make a case to keep it if the NY Times, LA times, Wa. Post, etc all decided to review it.  For a book like this, if Reason Magazine, the American Conservative and other niche magazines (just spitballing to think of right leaning libertarian publications with some clout) reviewed the book, I could see bending .  as such, it is a work produced by a libertarian thinktank on a subject near and dear to libertarians: divesting the government of its control over some sphere of power.  I wouldn't go so far as to call it "one of the most important..." of anything.  Free to Choose it's not.  without those reviews or some secondary source making the claims above about importance in the field, we should look to other criteria in the books notability guideline
— User:Protonk, 00:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NB (Wikipedia:Notability)