Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Ferrara
the problem is that the only sources that ''might'' be considered reliable are almost entirely negative. I mean, we ''might'' be able to create an article based on reliable sources but it's going to become a  issue if we ignore the negative in favour of the marginally positive like http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/books/item/15452-review-of-christopher-ferrara-s-liberty-the-god-that-failed this review by the current president of the John Birch Society or http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=66&catname=14 this article by Anthony Cekada or http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/2014/01/liberty-god-failed-christopher-ferrara.html this review by the current president of the Center for the American Idea. Most of what is available is material like http://tomwoods.com/on-chris-ferrara/ this from people like Thomas Woods. Most of the puffery would have to be removed and replaced with reliably sourced content which wouldn't be very positive at all
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 08:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEIGHT (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)