Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Philippine Presidents by longevity
I'm sorry if my 'pointless' comment offends, but this is trivia (IMHO). I can see no usefulness or any point to this organization of the presidents. As far as the US list (and many others), that seems more an example of  or US-centricity of WP than any valid precedent. Read the '''keep''' comments frome the AfD for the US Presidents list; ''Wikipedia should be a place for masses of information'', and ''Very interesting collections all'', and ''I came upon this page out of my own interest and would feel sad to see it go''. Granted I have excerpted the shorter and more succinct !votes, but there are none that make a valid argument. The result of the AfD was '''no consensus''', equivalent to the verdict '''not proven''', in Scottish law. Again in my opinion, ''other stuff exists'', and it too should be deleted
— User:Killing, 17:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)