Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical trials with surprising outcomes
If secondary sources could establish strong criteria for inclusion and article set, the utility of the list would outweigh the problem of deciding what is "surprising" vs. "merely unexpected". A resource for some good "game changing" research in medicine would be nice, but a list that would exclude Jenner's vaccination study or Pasteur's rabies series because they didn't have an acronym (weren't formal trials by modern standards) isn't. The current list suffers from |recentism, and the arbitrary character seems too great a gap to bridge
— User:Novangelis, 14:58, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RECENT (Wikipedia:Recentism)