Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Bond
I just wanted to point out the obvious, which is that the votes of canvassed users/single purpose accounts Checkingfax, Corinne and Jbeaton5 don't do much to advance the "keep" side's arguments. No, averring that "this article has potential", without specifically underlining sources to bolster such a claim, isn't convincing. Neither is advancing preposterous claims of "incivility". At some point, if you want this article kept, you're going to have to show how this individual conforms to  ("has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject") or . The rest is simply noise
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:ENT (Wikipedia:Notability)