Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over-arcing
It would be better for the nominator to state the reason for deletion in English. In particular I can't see any relevance for  PAPER here. Having got that off my chest this is clearly not a notable topic. I can't find any reliable sources that use this term in this manner, rather than contain an accidental juxtaposition of the words "over" and "arcing", apart from the patent linked in the article which is a primary source
— User:Phil, 14:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)