Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Mattix
In trying to disentangle the various parts of the nomination, it seems like the nomination is basically confused about  (representing what is in reliable sources, good) and  (applying notability standards to article contents, bad). Nonetheless, focusing on the policy-based rationale for deletion (), it's obvious from a simple Google search that the subject has been covered by multiple RS over multiple events (with multiple people), so it's a pass of  that is not ruled out by . It's worth noting that the sole redirect !vote above does not suggest a specific target, and indeed can't, since multiple valid targets are supported by RS, precisely because it is not a  situation
— User:Bakazaka, 00:09, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:NNC||WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)