Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Lataster (3nd nomination)
The subject does not have to pass  if they pass GNG.  From what I can see on google now he has at the very best a "very mixed academic reputation", BUT he is covered by reputable independent reliable sources, for example the ABC in Australia and the Washington post in the United states.  I suggest the subject passes  sufficiently to pass GNG.  Not liking the subject's subject of interest is not grounds for deletion despite how , or poor scholarship, it might be believed to perhaps be.  See the second AfD too
— User:Aoziwe, 11:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NEXIST||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Notability)