Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of French apartheid
Article is well written, encyclopedic, and uses high quality sources, and  isn't a valid reason for deleting. Nor are the various ''ad hominem'' comments that have peppered this AfD. The article also uses sources that all refer directly to French apartheid, and multiple sources refer to the same issues, so there are not  issues. Finally, I did an experiment last night and hit the "Random article" button twenty times; the majority of articles didn't even have any references, and the best article only had four. This one has 15, and the article itself was longer than all but 3 articles. I recommend this test to other editors, to see how this article stacks up against the Wikipedia norm
— User:Jayjg, 22:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)