Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inventory of Church Property
per . The original nomination says that this article is a dicdef, which it's clearly not — there's some discussion of the history of the process from the Middle Ages. I think that I can answer PMC's above question to Scorpions13256: ''When you say that "more sources are needed", do you mean "more sources are needed to indicate notability", or "more sources are needed in the body of the article"?'' I agree that more sources are needed, which (for me) means that the current state of the article is not very well-written, and there is obvious room for expansion on the topic. But the historical content from ''The Catholic Enyclopedia'' demonstrates notability, and if the content is not entirely reliable, then it can be corrected through normal editing, rather than deletion of a notable subject
— User:Toughpigs, 19:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ARTN (Wikipedia:Notability)