Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Sport
Outside of interviews, there's coverage solely on the subject (versus episode recaps) in the https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/rupauls-drag-race-jan-name-change_uk_5e6771ddc5b6670e72fe7b91?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAKMBe90PSF9S8ZxeiqFyRuM1o5k484QqIjodam0DLy-4hHlOUMmx-JxwzuIAjfs1Pega__FjarGWIycTFBphL1fDoberRpMrYSfQcbfecPKGGxGWlgXa6XYoScuG5KfVOXbALFvACqarylCItJtGj3DXNuQd_7TS7y7EzWdivb2b Huff Post, https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/pride/9362887/rupauls-drag-race-jan-elimination-playlist Billboard, https://www.gaytimes.co.uk/culture/134597/drag-race-fans-think-this-weeks-eliminated-queen-was-robbed-2/ Gay Times, https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/04/20/drag-race-jan-grandfather-coronavirus-season-12-jukebox/ Pink News, https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/drag-queen-jan-sport-makeup-140000307.html Cosmopolitan, and others. There's also tons of coverage discussing her participation on the show, which a quick Google search will show. As as aside, I don't think it's appropriate to nominate an article without following the deletion nomination steps, which includes a  search. Stating "They may be notable" leads me to believe there wasn't a lot of source review outside WP
— User:Kbabej, 21:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)