Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Substantial Gift (The Broken Promise)
Two of the four used sources are unreliable () by definition (user-edited content), the New York Times article is almost completely about the show and not about the pilot, and the fourth source just verifies the premiere date. Notability () has been challenged since November 2008, still hasn't been established (where is the "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject"?), and likely can't be established based on the very meager results of Google http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22A+Substantial+Gift%22+%22The+Broken+Promise%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives News, http://books.google.com/books?hl=de&as_brr=0&q=%22A+Substantial+Gift%22+%22The+Broken+Promise%22&btnG=Nach+B%C3%BCchern+suchen Books and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=de&lr=&q=%22A+Substantial+Gift%22+%22The+Broken+Promise%22&btnG=Suche&lr= Scholar. No prejudice against recreation if someone can actually prove that a proper article can be written, although I doubt this is even possible. &ndash
— User:Sgeureka, 12:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)