Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArbitrationGate controversy
This is a neologism and clearly fails .  It has 5 Google hits.  I know that counting Google hits is not a sensible criterion in general, but for a topic like this which is completely internet-based, I'd be suspicious at 50000 Google hits.  For comparison, GamerGate gets over 5 million.  As many have mentioned, the sources are ridiculously lacking, and there is no credible claim of notability in the article
— User:Slashme, 17:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)