Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Genovese
At a WP:COMMONSENSE level, {{u|Atlantic306}}'s initial argument is WP:SIGCOV – 4-5 years of research by a notable author on the BLP subject, brocast via a podcast series sponsored by the New York Times, a /P.  In addition, {{u|RebeccaGreen}}'s, and other, references also support broader WP:GNG.  There is certainly no consensus to delete this BLP (I was almost tempted to close it myself on that basis), however, there is also a clear consensus that it passes WP:BASIC as a Keep. Meeting WP:BASIC is not a legal concept, it is the consensus of a collection of Wikipedians following ''guidelines'' (not rules), as to what constitutes sufficient RS that can support a subject's GNG. I know that {{u|Vaselineeeeeeee}} has worked hard on this AfD, but they should listen to what other experienced Wikipedian's are saying – I have been there myself (many times); you go in with one view, and it gets completely turned, but that is what makes it interesting
— User:Britishfinance, 00:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)