Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reiner Grundmann
In my opinion he doesn't pass . And I doubt that the presentation is neutral, especially since the main author seems to use him to support his clear agenda to raise doubt in a lot of quite settled scientific fields, especially climate change. Just look at Naomi Oreskes: With Merchants of Doubt they have presented a well-respected work about climate change denial, which has been cited http://scholar.google.de/scholar?cites=3604367220790983448&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=de more than 800 times since publication in 2010. And now Serten uses Grundmann's single opinion (the Heartland Institute is criticised by Oreskes, so that doesn't count) to fully rebut Merchants of Doubt, of course without mentioning all the scientific praise for the book. If you takes this, the missing of elemental notability standards and add the POV in the Grundmann article, the solution can only be the deletion of the article. --Special:Contributions/84.170.141.233|84.170.141.233
— [[User talk:84.170.141.233|talk]]), 22:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)