Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voyage Au Pays Des Nouveaux Gourous
When I put up this AfD proposal, it was really because I couldn't see that a TV program was a likely candidate for an encyclopedia article.  But if there are pages devoted to episodes of the Simpsons, perhaps that's perfectly appropriate.  However, my concern is now that the article is really a back-door way of evading the  policies.  It's a way of giving extensive coverage to minority opinions about Landmark Education, and cloaking them in unwarranted authority.  It's perfectly ok to report the fact that some population (as long as you can identify them) hold the opinion that Landmark is cult, or that its programs harm people, or that it exploits its customers.  So long as you also report the fact that other (much larger) groups hold the opposite views, give due weight to each side of the debate, and don't advocate that either opinion is factually correct.  All this is already reported in the Landmark Education article itself (at perhaps excessive length already
— User:DaveApter, 18:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)