Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate social media
per , regardless of whatever can be found on Google to show |significant coverage in multiple |good sources, which by the way, has been shown, per .  It is axiom|axiomatic that our encyclopedia has articles on topics of interest to our core readership, who are students.  Many |otherwise odd yet commonplace articles exist here at WP, and have been |kept over and over again at AfD.  This is an obvious, commense-sense example.  Northamerica has found several good sources and has added them to the article, which is |now good enough for me.  Please move on, nothing to see here except |a few snowflakes
— User:Bearian, 19:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ODD||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:HEY||WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)