Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Gould
The notability test for actors, if you're shooting for "notable because she's had roles", is not passed just because the article ''says'' that roles have been had — it is passed only when |reliable sources ''attest'' to the "majorness" of the roles by paying attention to them and/or her. For example, a film review can help speak to an actor's notability if the critic singles the actor's performance out for special praise, but does not help speak to the actor's notability if it just mentions their name a single time in the cast list endnotes. Simply listing roles does ''not'' hand an actor a free exemption from having to have any sources, because then every actor would always get that free exemption the moment they had a second role. It doesn't take ''as much'' reliable source coverage to get a person over an SNG on "meets a specific notability criterion" grounds as it does to get a person over GNG on pure "just because media coverage exists" grounds — but it still takes more than ''none'', and ''no'' SNG ''ever'' confers a free exemption from having to show any evidence of reliable sources at all
— User:Bearcat, 20:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)