Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sivalinga as phallus
I created this during a cleanup effort by moving material |unduly impacting the Lingam article.  Currently, it consists of a predictably biased quote-farm; proper editing can fix this, as the issue is indeed a real one, philologically. Unfortunately,  the issue is also a radioactive one, and therefore a cruft magnet, which is why I think an article on this separate from Lingam is ''needed'' anyway.  Delete this one and in the fullness of time another one will appear for sure.  The correct approach is to make a proper article of it so that the WP-ecological niche remains occupied.  (I'm not partial to the current title; a better one would do nicely
— User:Rudrasharman, 23:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)