Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amiram Goldblum
Notability -- Subject appears notable.  Named chair at major university likely passes .  He may also be generally notable for his activist activities as well (especially if he's notable enough to be drawing attacks).  Another editor mentioned this when-in-doubt guideline for deletion "... where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus".  If indeed the subject requested deletion of this article in its current state, then I would be okay with deleting since it's at least arguably borderline.  But (1) if the subject requested deletion of an earlier article that was attack-oriented, then we need some comment from subject about ''this'' version of the article. (And as I said elsewhere, protection is one of the answers to an article prone to POV attacks and vandalism.) AND (2) if it's just that the subject is expressing doubt about his own notability in chemistry, I respectfully think we can override him based on  (if editor opinion is leading that way, of course
— User:Lquilter, 15:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)