Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DivXLand Media Subtitler
no significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. All I found were Special:Diff/618426619|these two sources, which don't discuss the software in more or less significant depth, and both have problems of their own: Softpedia is not independent (hosts indiscriminate collection of download and describe it randomly; no assertion of notability to reuse per ) and LifeHacker is a collective blog, albeit with some editorial control. Anyway, even if sources were 100% reliable and independent, the "significant coverage" criterion of  is not addressed
— user:czarkoff, 15:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)