Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Markus Funk
Subject may have a weak claim to notability under  for his books (the one on the ICC received a full length review in French http://rs.sqdi.org/volumes/22_2_Hebert_Dolbec.pdf), but I wasn't able to find any further reviews. His citations are too low to pass  as a legal scholar (unsurprisingly, since while his scholarly work is extremely impressive for a practitioner, his main job is as a practicing lawyer, not a law professor). I do not find sufficient coverage of the subject himself to justify . The delete !vote is weak because his notability is borderline, between all his activities, but is not quite there yet, IMO. Furthermore, the article in its current form is so strongly boosterish and promotional that  may apply
— User:RayAYang, 14:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Notability)