Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Marxism (2nd nomination)
and modify content (both articles are horrible). It appears "Frankfurt School conspiracy theory" has 0 Google Scholar hits and 1 Google Books hit (the only hit, ''Catastrophism: The Apocalyptic Politics of Collapse and Rebirth'', is being used as a source despite the fact it's a book by a radio journalist).  The term "Cultural Marxism" on the other hand has plenty of usage in Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Cultural+Marxism%22 1760 hits, regardless whether it's with a lower-case "C" or not - and indeed not all usage refers to what we're discussing about at all - but that just means a redirect is inappropriate). So why would "Frankfurt School conspiracy theory" somehow be a better title when it has very little actual usage outside of a 2003 SPLC intelligence report? Sourcing is difficult on both articles, and both articles currently are inappropriate per . If a merge is done, Frankfurt School conspiracy theory should be merged back into Cultural Marxism because the latter has far more usage. People have rightly criticized Cultural Marxism article's poor condition, but at the same time they have ignored the fact that the other article is just as poor. Or should both be deleted, then
— User:Pudeo, 23:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)