Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goal Line Blitz (2nd nomination)
per failing  as lacking significant, independent, reliable coverage to suit , such as from /RS. Looking at previous AfD, while delete arguments center on lack of notability, the keep arguments center around , which is not lasting notability in WP terms. There are other minor arguments, but most are incompatible with notability. Their site http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/press.html list some press mentions. I don't have access to the magazine (I suspect it's one of those blurbs rather than a full review), GameFront page is 404 and there's no archive (being under "news.", I doubt it was a full review), while http://www.mpogd.com/news/?ID=3734 is in fact unreliable per /RS. Removing the / from the article would leave us with a stub as there are no reliable sources to use for expansion. —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 11:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:WAF||WP:VG||WP:POPULARITY||WP:VG||WP:GAMECRUFT||WP:FANCRUFT (Wikipedia:Notability)