Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Event of Moon Disaster
I've noticed that almost every "keep" argument posted above follows the same basic rationale, namely that the article is |interesting, that |articles of "lesser importance" exist on Wikipedia, and that it deserves to be on Wikipedia |simply for being a historic document, all of which are considered |arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. I'd like to comment that nobody questions the notability of this document. Clearly, it's a historic document. However, #REPOSITORY|Wikipedia is not the place for historical soruces; that's what Wikisource is for. Furthermore, there is simply no need to have this as a separate article. Any relevant information can easily be put into the Apollo 11 article and the speech can be moved to Wikisource. That would be the way to go with this article
— User:Hnsampat, 17:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:INTERESTING||WP:WAX||WP:ABOUTEVERYTHING||WP:ATA||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)