Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Meugniot
The general requirement of in-depth coverage in , which is not met here, largely derives from the desire to have sufficient reliable sources to avoid inappropriate  weight and thus honor  and .  Some of our special notability guidelines carefully carve out, largely correctly, alternative guidelines which work well in specific fields--things like the named chair provision of  and as here, some   provisions of .  While I'm often dubious of claims of the significance of roles and/or movie works which themselves lack much in the way of coverage, the daytime Emmy nominations (and any independent reviews of his works, as noted by  Hullaballoo Wolfowitz above) each independently would to my mind "hit the bar".   Are we relying on horrible sources to show that?  I don't think so, even if the sourcing here looks weak overall.  Are the nominations verifiable?  I presume so.  Is the resulting article horribly non-neutral?  I doubt it. So, why not
— User:Joe, 01:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:UNDUE||WP:NPOV||WP:BLP||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ENT (Wikipedia:Notability)