Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Wheeler (2nd nomination)
Does not appear to be notable enough per . Searches for http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+wikipedia&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 her name plus Wikipedia, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+%22liberal+democrats%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus Liberal Democrats, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+LGBT&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus LGBT, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+gay&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus gay, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+lesbian&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus lesbian, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+%22brazen+radio%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus Brazen Radio, and finally plus http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+wikimedia&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 wikimedia appear to turn up insufficient sourcing for everything she may be notable for that is listed in her article from reliable third-party sourcing. As her former status (she appears to have resigned?) on an inactive/seperate fork of the Wikimedia project (their page on Meta the last I looked was http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_UK&limit=500&action=history largely idle for some time) is no factor towards figuring notability, unfortunate Delete
— User:Lawrence, 22:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)