Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tone FM
While this definitely needs more sourcing than it has before it could be considered a ''good'' article, it doesn't need any more sourcing than it has to satisfy : the base criteria that a radio station has to meet to be eligible for a Wikipedia article are that it is |verifiable in at least one |reliable source as (a) having a license from the appropriate broadcast regulator, and (b) originating at least some of its own programming in its own studios. As long as those conditions are met, a radio station need claim ''nothing'' else that would make it a ''special'' case above and beyond any other radio station — media outlets are one of those areas where Wikipedia's stated and consensus-established goal is to be as ''complete'' as feasibly possible a reference for ''all'' verifiable members of their class of topic. (No, we obviously can't be ''perfect'' about it — but our goal ''is'' to get and stay as close to "all radio stations that meet the criteria, without exception" as we can realistically get.) So this should absolutely be flagged for refimprove, because it does indeed need more referencing than this before it can be considered a ''good'' article — but to be ''keepable'', all a radio station actually has to do is show at least ''one'' reliable source (which the BBC certainly is) which verifies that the base criteria for notability are met. Obviously we would still ''prefer'' more sourcing than is present in the article right now — but to get a radio station over the ''base'' inclusion criteria, the only thing we ''require'' is that the reliable sourcing isn't sitting at ''zero
— User:Bearcat, 18:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NMEDIA||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)