Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus and comparative mythology
Reviewing the nominator's contributions, there is a strong pro-Christian bias and I am not entirely sure this was nominated in good faith. I think the article is pretty well-sourced with 27 footnotes.  I am concerned, however, that we have Jesus and comparative mythology, Historicity of Jesus, Jesus myth hypothesis, '''and''' Historical Jesus, but given the long length of each I suppose it's understandable.  Suggest a ball close. &larr
— [[User talk:BenB4|BenB4]], 17:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)