Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinduism and Judaism (2nd nomination)
and improve, as just referring to the above "Find sources" proves: (1) https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Hinduism+and+Judaism%22&num=50 Googling "Hinduism and Judaism" shows about 440,000 results; (2) https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Hinduism+and+Judaism%22 "books" shows about 23,100 results; (3) http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Hinduism+and+Judaism%22 "scholar" shows about 643 results; (4) http://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=%22Hinduism%20and%20Judaism%22 "JSTOR" shows about 78 results. All in all this is obviously a serious topic for which many  and  sources can be easily lined up. Effort should be put into improving the article. Perhaps contacting  editors at Wikipedia talk:Hinduism-related topics notice board and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism and asking for their input and help at improving the article would be a better service to building up WP as an encyclopedia. This nomination is unwarranted and the nominator would do well to read up on  and 
— User:IZAK, 09:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:EXPERT||WP:DONOTDEMOLISH||WP:CHANCE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)