Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (9th nomination)
the subject simply doesn't pass , which allows two routes to demonstrating notability: the GNG route of significant coverage in third party reliable sources, or winning well known awards (which isn't claimed here). The third-party sources which are held up as evidence of notability boil down to places which mention, reference, quote or link to Railpage Australia. Actual coverage of the site in such sources is extremely slim. Aside from these we are left with numerous citations to the site itself (which isn't independent) and automated pages such as traffic stats or domain registration (which are virtually worthless). It does look like a determined effort has been made to present this as a notable topic, but there's very little to back that up
— User:Hut, 21:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)