Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Pantagruel
A new approach that may be more productive." Would everyone agree that the fundamental disagreement here hinges on a lack of consensus on the minimum standard of non-trivial mention in a newspaper--or really any "reliable source," correct? Isn't the main sticking point specifically the meaning of the phrase "a brief summary of the nature of the content of a web publication" in the nontriviality guidelines in ? It may be better to try to clear this up, ideally by reference to specific cases in Wikipedia where online publications similar to TNP were AND were not allowed to have their own entries for reasons based on the non-triviality guideline. Can anyone provide such examples
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)