Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainocene
to sustainable development;  @Ryulong, your argument appears to be based on the reasonable concern in  that we shouldn't be used as a platform to foster the popularity of terms.  If the word had never appeared in the professional literature, I would probably agree with you.  But it did pass its review process and got published, so I don't see a big abuse-of-process problem using a redirect on the term
— User:NewsAndEventsGuy, 23:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NEOLOGISM (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)