Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earliest living former members of the Australian Senate
If making the list requires you to set up and code a spreadsheet on your own, because the list hasn't already been compiled by outside sources, then by definition you're doing |original research — and the US list should most likely be deleted as well on the same grounds, but per  the fact that it hasn't ''already'' been deleted does not justify this list in and of itself. The reason such information tends to be hard to find is because it has no inherent value in the first place — identifying who was the first holder of any given political role to still be alive today is not a thing people need at all, because "earliest living" confers no special status on former politicians over and above other former politicians. If the information had any value at all, then the list would have already existed somewhere, and could have just been copied wholesale without having to fire up Excel to figure it out yourself — the fact that such outside sources ''don't'' exist is because people don't need the information ''at all''. Speaking as a Canadian, we've ended up with a lot of pointless content that had to be deleted, solely because somebody decided that Canada has to comprehensively replicate ''every'' "List of X" that the United States has, even if the topic has no actual meaning or relevance or applicability in Canada at all
— User:Bearcat, 14:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:No original research)