Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArbitrationGate controversy
Obviously this just ''must'' be my internalised misogyny talking - but this is obviously |made to make a point and nothing else. The title isn't established and if we must have coverage of this, I agree that a footnote in the main subject's page is the only way to go about it. As someone said above, in a week this will probably be  regardless
— User:Panyd, 16:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)