Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayard Bridge
I'm not sure that your comment about  really applies here - that deals with prediction of future events.  That's not what we're debating.  We're discussing if this bridge is notable and unique enough to warrant a Wikipedia article.  Based on what has been developed in this article over the least 2 years, the only discussion in the newspaper articles as being of the difficulty in finding replacement funding until 25 years after the bridge was closed, and the extremely rural low-traffic nature of the areahttp://www.wvdot.com/3_ROADWAYS/RP/TA%20Traffic%20files/VCnt/grant105.pdf, I don't see that this bridge justifies an article on its own.  As part of a larger article about Bayard or bridges of the Upper North Branch Potomac, maybe
— User:Bmpowell, 22:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)