Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter film/book differences (2nd nomination)
because these entries have '''zero''' real-world context.  There are always, always going to be changes in the adaptation of a source material for creative and conventional reasons -- the only notable changes to record should be those covered by published, secondary sources, not what an editor ''subjectively'' deems appropriate.  It is |original research for an editor who has watched the film and read the book to put 2 and 2 together and determine, "The difference between these pieces of information is notable to belong on Wikipedia!"  I'm looking at Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone|the article now, and I see an incredibly insipid difference in ''hair color''.  I can't say that the other changes mean much, either, if there is '''no real-world context''' to determine that all these differences mean something except to "It's useful" to Harry Potter fans.  Such differences should belong on a Harry Potter Wikia, not on this encyclopedia
— User:Erik, 12:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)