Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Great Black Britons
The accuracy of the list as far as who is or isn't black is completely beside the point, as the article is ''about'' the list (or the website that hosts it) as a document or work, and there are plenty of notable works that are complete rubbish factually. And so we can (and should) deal with this simply by judging the notability of the list (or website) itself, keeping  in mind.If the article is kept, the list itself should be removed, as the list is copyrighted as an author's creative selection and arrangement (who is included and in what order is subjective) rather than uncopyrightable fact
— User:Postdlf, 17:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)