Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tangst
per . The point here is that there is insufficient information provided by other parties, that is, other than the blog itself. For example, nobody appeared to care to link to this blog http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A//tangst.blogspot.com/ nor to talk about it http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=tangst+blog&qt_s=Search. It may become more notable in the future, but for now there shouldn't be an encyclopedia article about it
— User:Paolo, 20:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)