Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conrad Bangkok
The sources provided by Cunard are more than sufficient to establish notability per  and most certainly per . The objections to Cunard's sources are unconvincing. E.g. the first source, http://archive.today/2020.11.16-094303/https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=WORLDNEWS&docref=news/1239DDCD565BB588&f=basic provides in-depth non-perfunctory review of the hotel. Yes, the review is quite complimemtary, but there is no evidence that the author from The Daily Telegraph should be regarded as non-independent. The article was published in the Features section of the paper. I see no reason why we are supposed to treat this source as "advertisement" rather than as a bona fide independent source; at least no such reason has been offered
— User:Nsk92, 01:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)