Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the Anti-Defamation League
back to the main article. Unlike what most editors have stated here in reality the criticism section isn't long or large or overbearing or whatever else you want to call it. It's certainly not large enough to stand up as an article on its own. The article was not in need of a content fork. While the criticism section was a little large, it could have easily been trimmed back. It does not need a separate article. The split, which was not discussed, has changed the editorial bias of the main article by providing one point of view, while the other "sub-article" provides another. We should not be splitting articles into positive sides and negative sides and I see no consensus to say otherwise. Both  and  provide valuable insight on why this should not have occurred. If AfD results in a keep, we've lost the original contribution history which is in violation of  and needs to be corrected immediately following the guidelines on that page
— User:Matty, 09:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:STRUCTURE||WP:POVFORK||WP:SPLIT (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)