Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Hale
Radio personalities are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist, but the referencing here is not adequate to get her over  and nothing claimed in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to get over GNG. I'd also note that ''after'' this nomination was initiated, an anonymous IP rewrote the article to be even more |advertorialized than it already was — I just had to switch the introduction back to "speaker, best seller expert and book publicist for high-profile entrepreneurs, politicians and celebrities" (i.e. her actual claim to potential notability) rather than "was once a single mother, living in a women's refuge but went on to become an entrepreneur after a career in broadcasting and publishing." I'm happy for her, but people don't get Wikipedia articles just to honour them for making something of themselves out of difficult circumstances — they get articles by being the ''subject'' of ''media'' coverage ''about'' them, but none is being shown here at all
— User:Bearcat, 18:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOTADVERT (Wikipedia:Notability)