Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual deaths (7th nomination)
Delete is the only option here, because this fails  in spades.  There's no set-in-stone criteria as to what's an unusual death and what isn't, and I can guarantee you that Warden's books disagree with each other as to that criteria.  If you need proof of how subjective this list is, you should note that the Wikipedia community has spent the time since the 5th AfD fighting over what belongs and what doesn't.  And there's good reason why there's never going to be any agreement: because, on the one hand, anything that's not one of the top 4-5 worldwide causes of death can be considered "unusual"; but on the other, anything which has claimed more than one life can be considered "usual".  Many of the top-notch lists on Wikipedia have clearly defined criteria (people who were X and did Y, usually; or places designated A because of association with B); this list could be 1 MB and still not be exhaustive, another no-no per 
— User:Purplebackpack89, 17:40, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)