Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNAlogy
All the links I found traced back directly to this commercial operation and none were |reliable sources.  This might qualify for deletion as |advertising -- it's not really a |dictionary definition, more like a trade-mark that the company is attempting to "word-ify" with the aid of product placements like this one
— User:Ubelowme, 18:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SPAM||WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)