Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional penguins
three of the five keep !votes are based on arguments which are widely considered to be erroneous -  is not a justification to keep, the argument that it is popular is basically just a simplified version of  and the argument by Calathan basically ignores the fact that |consensus can change and also shares problems with . I'm not sure that any policy states that entries in a list shouldn't be sourced simply because the entities listed are sourced, and certainly not all the penguins listed have sources on their main article. There's also an issue that some penguins on the list don't have articles. If  is "invalid", you need to take that up on the talk page or at the village pump. At the moment, I believe it reflects consensus
— User:Claritas, 11:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:POPULARPAGE||WP:CCC||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:SALAT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)