Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AliView
NB: I am the nominator) I appreciate the additions made since this AfD request; however IMO the same concerns still remain. Is there some claim of notability besides the number of citations, eg some detailed reasoning (ie meeting ) of why it was chosen in the cited studies over any of the other List of alignment visualization software|many alignment visualizers listed in Wikipedia? Bioinformatics software packages in general seem to have the issue {{u|Lemongirl942}} brings up: its existence alone doesn't merit a WP article. I'd like to see a large overhaul of the coverage of bioinformatics software on WP, for example cutting the aforementioned list to ''only'' bluelinked packages (which should ''also'' be able to demonstrate their own notability), but this is perhaps getting away from the current topic
— User:Amkilpatrick, 01:05, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)