Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Nicholson
While I would agree that the subject is notable, they have requested deletion. We have precedent for complying with these requests, see CGP Grey and edits around his name. While this would not technically be a G7 speedy (as she is not the author of the article), we also have the Speedy Deletion criteria for authors who request a page be deleted. In the CGP Grey case, we as editors maintain Grey's privacy because we're decent human beings (sometimes). In its current form, there are very few  with  to make this viable in the long-term. I agree with {{u|Astrophobe}}'s assessment above. Nicholson has a variety of published articles and mainstream mentions, but to get the type of information that we get on other BLP candidates would involve a level of invasion of privacy that would at the very least violate the spirit of . I know that the intentions of {{u|Sheila1988}}, {{u|MadScientistX11}}, {{u|No1lakersfan}} and {{u|TwilightFluttershy}} are good |(I hope), and this is not a suggestion that Nicholson is not talented or notable in Youtube spaces, but we should consider if this is really worth the amount of personal strain that this may cause to the subject of the article, and how much reliable information could theoretically be obtained without violating her privacy
— User:Bkissin, 00:51, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOR||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)