Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Lomax
This is not "well sourced" towards |notability. It is sourced but a problem per above comments is that the sources that are not  are more about the discoveries than the subject. Reference to |other articles, as a show of reasoning to keep, is often misguided. Darren Naish has a PhD, Matt J. Wedel is an associate professor, and Mike P. Taylor a PhD, so there are some apple and oranges comparisons going on. This is currently a terrible |pseudo  needing biographical content like a birthday, family, education, etc... but this has become acceptable even on a BLP. He is an https://www.doncasterfreepress.co.uk/news/doncaster-to-celebrate-the-work-of-scientist-dean-lomax-with-exhibition-and-fun-day-1-8733460 honory scientist and has co-authored books, including https://books.google.com/books?id=piwntAEACAAJ&dq=Books+by+Dean+R+Lomax&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiW0f2p6f_aAhURbq0KHeReDEYQ6AEIKTAA ''The Bone Wars'' and https://blog.everythingdinosaur.co.uk/blog/_archives/2014/08/03/dinosaurs-of-the-british-isles-book-review.html ''Dinosaurs of the British Isles''. He also appears to be well https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C19&q=%22Dean+R+Lomax%22&btnG= published in peer-reviewed papers and in scientific journals so appears to pass  and the professor test. He has self-professed to having a "MPhil in palaeontology" working towards a PhD. A sad state of an article does not diminish notability
— User:Otr500, 17:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHER||WP:PSEUDO||WP:BLP||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:notability||WP:primary (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)