Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human disguise
and I liked the "Human suit" title.  I consider the |work that has gone into this article since it was first deleted under the other name, and in consideration of the term finding wide use in http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&num=20&q=%22Human+Suit%22&cf=all reliable sources and many http://books.google.com/books?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&num=20&q=%22Human%20Suit%22&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np books (Who didn't actually look?).  The article will benefit from continued expansion and further sourcing as the term exists, whether Juman suit, Human disguise, etc., is used, and has a fascinating notability. All that need be recognized is the article's delightful |potential for improvement and how it can be made to serve the project.  What can be improved through normal editing does not belong at AfD
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 09:46, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:HEY||WP:POTENTIAL (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)