Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is Genesis History?
This article has plenty of good independent sources. In addition to the two sources that Jytdog considers good, there is Box Office Mojo, Religion News Service, ''AMFM Magazine'', ''World (magazine)|World'', ''WorldNetDaily'', ''The Christian Post'', and the ''Christian Examiner (California)|Christian Examiner''. While some of these sources are run by Christians, several of them are secular. All of them are notable publications. All of these are acceptable sources -- just because a publication's editorial stance may be slanted in favor of this movie does not mean the source should be disqualified. Most of the other references are reviews from notable organizations/publications: The Gospel Coalition, The BioLogos Foundation, AiG, ICR, and CMI. You can't say that this movie hasn't been noticed or has not received much coverage. Of course, many (but definitely not all, not even close) sources have some connections to Christianity, but that's expected because this movie is intended for a Christian audience. This movie was released in more theaters, has a higher box office (even if you only count the BOM source with hasn't been updated since the first day of release), and received more coverage from notable sources than quite a few movies that have Wikipedia articles, even those that survived an AfD. This movie definitely meets , and if there are any problems with the article, fix the article rather than deleting it per 
— User:1990, 20:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RUBBISH (Wikipedia:Notability)