Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bennetts Associates
suggest the  process for a possible ''Rab Bennetts'' or ''Denise Bennetts'' article) I've only been able to locate a handful of sources, the best amongst them listed below. At the time I first received a COI edit request for the Bennetts Associates article, the founder was listed (alone) as Rab Bennetts. On the website he is listed as Denise Bennetts partner. The COI editor who made the request wanted her listed as co-founder. He has received an Order of the British Empire|OBE{{cite web|title=Commission for Architecture and the Purpose-Built Environment — Appointments and Reappointments — Biographical notes: Rab Bennetts, OBE|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/77668/PA_CABE.pdf|website=Gov.UK|publisher=UK Department of Culture, Media and Sport|date=December 2010}} and she is listed in ''Who's Who''.{{cite journal|title=Bennetts, Denise Margaret Mary, (born 26 Jan. 1953), Co-Founder and Director, Bennetts Associates Architects, since 1987|journal=Who's Who & Who Was Who|doi=10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.58789|url=https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.58789|publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing plc., Oxford University Press|language=en}} For the article to remain, I believe it should be established that the firm ''on its own'' is notable. But I don't believe it is notable, as the other architects at that firm haven't established a presence that goes beyond the Bennetts — in other words, the two Bennetts '''''are''''' the firm — and the firm's notability would not exist without them. '''''Yes''''' there should be a Rab or Denise Bennetts article but '''''No''''' there shouldn't be one for the offices that these two work at. According to , notability is a property of a ''subject'' and not of a Wikipedia ''article''. By having an article named Bennetts Associates, the assumption is that ''the firm'' is the subject. But the subject to whom that notability is conferred to is ''the Bennetts'' — for it is ''they'' who are the subject of the article, and not their firm. If anything, the article is mislabled, and the information contained in it should be proposed through AFC as an article on the Bennetts
— User:Spintendo, 22:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AFC||WP:ARTN (Wikipedia:Articles for creation)