Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demonic "Fantasy"
having read the article, I would tend to agree with your appraisal. This comes under my definition of |original research, and as you rightly said, appears to be intentionally disparaging of the things it cites as examples, not to mention being very |POV too
— User:Robchurch, 16:13, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ISNOT||WP:POV (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)