Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klemens Fischer
without prejudice against recreation if somebody without a |conflict of interest can do better. I can't read German, so I'm not equipped to determine whether he has enough coverage in |reliable sources to clear  — but this is written like a résumé rather than an encyclopedia article, is based entirely on |primary sources (his own staff profiles on the self-published websites of his own employers, etc.) rather than reliable ones, and is stating nothing about him that counts as "inherently" notable enough to make it necessary to keep an article that's written and sourced this badly. And the German article, as written, isn't any better — it's following exactly the same format (the English one is literally a straight translation of it, in fact) and citing exactly the same primary sources, and should rightly be deleted on DE too. If a German speaker can do ''better'', be my guest
— User:Bearcat, 18:14, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)