Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat O'Donnell
if its for "soapboxing" then I suggest  not delete it. What is the rationale behind deletion, is it based on notability, unreliable sources etc? I remain unconvinced because I dont hear a reason to actually delete it
— User:Vintagekits, 10:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FIXIT (Wikipedia:Be bold)