Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abba Gumel
per #C1 (highly cited publications in a low-citation field) as well as #C5 (the named chair). The publication impact is borderline enough that I'd be willing to follow the subject's preference if notability were based only on it, but the named chair is unambiguous. And the deletion statement (especially the part about "he will setup a page" seems to reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is and how it works — it is not a hosting site for you to write about yourself, nor should the subject of an article have direct control over it. As for the article being a "violation": obviously if the subject sees and can articulate specific problems with it then those should be cleaned up, but it looks unobjectionable to me
— User:David, 05:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)