Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAR Camp
I see the editorial problems of POV and self-promotion. And I don't have a good feel for the  standards, which clearly apply. On that score, quality of writing aside, I wondered, why delete BarCamp but not, say, FooCamp? Then, I noticed, via Talk:BAR_Camp, this BarCamp article has been cited by http://www.hindu.com/2006/04/17/stories/2006041701671700.htm The Hindu in a piece on new protocols for organizing conferences. A quick http://news.google.com/news?oe=UTF-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=barcamp&btnG=Search+News Google News search pulled up 3 more similar media references. (I've added them.) So, which is appropriate: serious editing for POV or delete? If delete, could someone clarify how the  standards apply to conferences
— User:Latrippi, 02:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)