Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genealogical relationships of Presidents of the United States (2nd nomination)
this is a perfect example of the dicta that "|AfD is not for cleanup" and "|please search online before coming to AfD".  The article has inconsistent, irregular, or missing citations, but that is no reason for deletion.  Every bit of information could, in theory, be |sourced well, mostly Legacy.com, Peerage books, Snopes.com, Ancestry.com, periodicals, Presidential biographies, etc.   Our core readership -- students -- will certainly want to find this information and the citations therein right here on our Project. |Consensus does not change that quickly since the last AFD only eight months ago; even my mother's pregnancy lasted longer than that.  The Community decided that it was notable less than  a year ago.  My standard for CCC is thus: if you would be laughed out of family court for re-litigating a settled child support or child custody issue, then you should not try to argue an AFD so soon.  I can only think of one AfD that was re-nominated so soon, and ''only because'' Jimbo Wales got involved in that one.  Now, I'd love to trim out the NN relationships (19th cousins and the like
— User:Bearian, 19:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CLEANUP||WP:BEFORE||WP:RS||WP:CCC (Wikipedia:Cleanup)