Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgetown Bagelry
I see no reason to discount the Washington Post as a "local" source. If a Topeka business were covered in a Kansas statewide paper, then it would clearly meet the definition of "regional" in . I don't see why coverage of an area with a population of over 6 million should be inferior to coverage of an area with a population of less than 3 million, so IMO the Washington Post is a ''regional'' source for the DC metropolitan area (a ''region''). https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/food/1981/09/24/bringing-home-the-bagels/4861e047-6097-4f0c-bce3-bf1a8a4fc083/ That source, along with the https://archive.vn/20130630174203/http://www.wtop.com/109/1373231/Georgetown-Bagelry-Closes-M-Street-Shop local coverage in WTOP, combine to constitute significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, at least one of which is more than local. I am sympathetic to DGG's point about "a directory or every restaurant in a city with a major newspaper", but likewise we can ask: Do we want to be a directory of every restaurant in a small state with a statewide paper? Currently,  says yes, and to go against it would either be a , or require believing that the media market of a major metropolitan area is not as important as the media market of a small state
— User:King, 03:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUD||WP:AUD||WP:LOCALCONSENSUS (Wikipedia:Notability)