Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of topics characterized as pseudoscience (3rd nomination)
if anything at all - to "List of pseudosciences" and have the inclusion criteria mirror ; whereas, the resulting list article will have entries mirroring that of tl|Category:Pseudoscience but with an explanation next to each entry (as we have it now). Otherwise, I'd vote '''Keep''' and remind everyone that being included in this list does not mean that a topic is definitively pseudoscientific; ''only that some notable source has characterized it as such.'' Essentially, either this is a "List is of topics characterized as pseudoscience" and we abide by  by including all notable characterizations past and present ''or'' we change it to a "List of pseudosciences" and we only include obvious pseudosciences or topics which are generally considered pseudosciences
— User:Levine2112, 19:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:PSCI||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)