Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Mohammed v. Donald Rumsfeld
There have been a limited number of habeas corpus petitions filed on behalf of the captives in Bagram. It was very difficult for lawyers in the USA to learn the identities of the captives held in Bagram, but they succeeded in doing so a few times. For those who don't know, Bagram Air Base holds what has been called ''"the other Guantanamo"'' -- the Bagram Theater Internment Facility.  There has been a significant amount of comment from  over those habeas petitions.  Some  commented that those habeas petitions would have a very significant effect if captives held in Bagram were given access to the US court system.Since this article has started there have been some significant developments.  A US District Court Judge in Washington ruled that most Bagram captives were not eligible to access the US court system.  They ruled that only those captives who were not captured in Afghanistan, and who were taken to Afghanistan by the USA were eligible to access the US court system.I have no problem merging the other habeas petitions from Bagram captives into a single article, and I suggest this now.  IMO the assertion that this topic is not notable is not supportable.For what it is worth the Grizwold article is still available online.  I came across a new link to it just a couple of days ago.  I would take the time to fix that reference, and add additional references to bring this article up to date -- if it weren't that a recent flood of {{tl|xfd}} over articles or userspace pages I started simply does not allow me enough time to do so
— User:Geo, 13:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)