Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primary water
This is a fringe topic, but that's fine, we have many articles on those as was said right above me. Where this runs afoul of policy is that many of the sources cited support a small fact in the text, but little in the way of reliable sources support combining those facts to back up the desired claim. Thus we have |synthesis at work. Again as mentioned above there is little in the way of |reliable sourcing to cover the concept from soda to hock in the kind of detail we need. This article gives the appearance of being the paper submitted to scientific journals which puts all the facts together to prove the conclusion. Unfortunately that's cart-before-the-horse here
— User:Crow, 22:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)