Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kallappadam
per easily meeting .  {{u|Gene93k}} is eminently correct. Come on {{u|Finngall}}, {{u|L235}}, and {{u|Arjayay}} The {{u|Joseph2302|nominator}} (sorry Joseph) made a poor #REASON|deletion rationale, should hone his , and really should understand that a topic's notability is found per sources being available, and not whether an article is sourced or not. We have enough sources speaking toward this film for the topic to meet . IE: http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/cinema-columns/kallappadam-a-meta-movie-with-good-ideas-that-needed-better-filmmaking/article7016070.ece ''The Hindu'', https://4d1fac7452666a9f1a1e7b6fa5af791fa725173b.googledrive.com/host/0B3ke7sJYbO1gVkRjUVh6bmtqeVU/IndianEnglishNewspaperSearch.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=kallappadam&gsc.sort= and '''many''' others. Did you guys forgot to do BEFORE yourself prior to opining
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 00:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:DEL||WP:BEFORE||WP:NF (Wikipedia:Notability)