Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogan
it seems to me that no-one in this 'discussion' has managed to assert how this article can be more than a dicdef, which was my original reason for nominating the article. My use of  was merely to point out that most of the article is at present OR, and that that's all that pads it beyond a dicdef. Even the assertion of fictional characters as bogans is largely unverifiable, except in a couple of seminal cases where the word 'bogan' was specifically used. The wide currency of a word in no way indicates that there should be an article about it
— User:Mgekelly, 22:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)