Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Odin Brotherhood
reads like utter FictionCruft. I mean, sources?? Who is this important to? Hilarious , verifiability and blatant self-promotion issues too... Writing a book qualifies you to do exactly '''SQUAT''' on WP. The existence of a notable subject qualifies '''anybody''' to write an article about it, PhD or not... 173 unique Googles, nearly all of which are commercial listings for the book rather than any verification of the subject, http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22odin+brotherhood%22&num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=250&sa=N while the comments on the book's Amazon page (sales rank: #2,970,920)  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1558183183/o/qid=932166174/sr=8-1/002-4483871-9621412 could not stink more strongly of Sockpuppetry. Mirabello has been very clever with his linkscattering, especially the various legit sounding google references which eventually end up http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/1043/ here. Nice try
— User:Deiz, 02:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)