Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim White-Sobieski
This person fails , but that is not a sole factor in deciding what is notable and what is not. Does the person meet ? '''Barely'''. And I do mean barely. He (and one or more of his works) is ''mentioned'' in many different sources, such as http://www.metropolismag.com/March-2006/East-Meets-West-on-the-Champs-Elys-eacutees/ this magazine article, as well as http://www.myvirtualpaper.com/doc/WhiteWall/whitewallsummer2010/2010080201/51.html#50 this one. He's also mentioned in some news articles as well (such as https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.welt.de%2Flifestyle%2Farticle2869221%2FKunst-und-Mode-sind-eine-gute-Partie.html&edit-text=&act=url here (translated), and https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stern.de%2Flifestyle%2Fleute%2Fvanessa-beecroft-vuitton-und-die-nackten-frauen-3329788.html&edit-text=&act=url here (also translated)). The sources (collectively) do add up to be significant ''per se'', and there are many more sources that do mention his work such as art centers and publishers (not secondary sources, but they are noted and considered). Why such a weak keep? Because I don't see any sources that cover the person ''himself'' in an in-depth manner, nor do I see anything regarding his work that asserts any kind of cultural, social, or societal impact. I'm really on the fence about this vote, mostly because the sources that I found ''mention'' him and one or more of his artistic pieces, but aren't ''exclusively covering'' the person. But, the many sources I found were plentiful, reliable, and secondary. For these reasons, I believe the article meets  and that notability is established... barely, but just enough
— User:Oshwah, 01:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)