Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Larman
I guess the basis of my argument is in the following passage from : "Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources." My interpretation is that primary sources are enough, so long as they adequately establish that "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors" per . I believe both apply here
— User:Celtechm, 18:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)