Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldcoin
as a non-notable topic failing  with lack of reliable ''in-depth'' sources. Alternative coin lists or generic articles about coins (as with previous AfDs), where Worldcoin appears, are not in-depth sources, those are passing mentions or extremely brief generic descriptions. Looking at links above, the only substantial material is from opinion pieces and primary sources. Almost every article argued to be reliable (which by itself isn't enough) deals with multiple currencies and in none of them Worldcoin appears outside a small dedicated paragraph (and often copy paste of features). Market caps or any other niche field-only measure has nothing to do with notability. And definitely not subjective measures like "known", "legit", "reputable", etc. I see a large influx of new editors arguing this point above and only a couple of editors actually addressing the |notability guideline. Obviously promotion-driven arguments from pages like http://worldcoinforum.org/topic/594-wdc-wikipedia-easy-promotion-opportunity/ this or http://worldcoinforum.org/topic/544-wikipedia-page-gone/ this are unacceptable and I suspect a great deal of COI. —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 12:34, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)