Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stealing Summers
per meeting  and  by having requisite more-than-trivial commentary and analysis... even if in |Spanish sources.https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Stealing+Summers%22&num=50#q=%22Stealing+Summers%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=gXGQUNzdD8rTigKj2IGYAQ&ved=0CB8QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=2b955bbbc36d8184&bpcl=36601534&biw=1014&bih=589http://www.stealingsummers.com/Press/Jagger_for_Rolling_Stone.PDF ''Rolling Stone'' seems more that a "brief mention", and these http://www.stealingsummers.com/Press/Spanish_Press_Clips.PDF other Spanish soutces are more than tivial.  Article could benefit from use of these sources and regular editing, as non English coverage would certainly be expected for even an English language film premiered outside the US. It being |unknown here is not a valid reason to delete.  anyone
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 00:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:NONENG||WP:UNKNOWNHERE||WP:CSB (Wikipedia:Notability)