Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Chen
Nothing claimed in this article gives him an automatic pass of any subject-specific inclusion criterion, but the article is not sourced nearly well enough to claim  in lieu; this is based almost entirely on |primary and/or unreliable sources, with the ''reliable'' source coverage being limited to glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that aren't ''about'' him. And appearing as a talking head on the news doesn't aid encyclopedic notability, either: if he's giving soundbite about something ''else'', then he fails to be the ''subject'' of that piece of coverage, and if he's talking about ''himself'' then it's subject to the same problems as any other |self-published source: people can and do lie about and/or misrepresent themselves. And getting attacked on social media is not a notability freebie, either. So no, nothing here is enough and Wikiwatcher isn't strengthening the case with his arguments. And I ain't no Tucker Carlson fan, neither, so my comment isn't coming from a place of ideological bias
— User:Bearcat, 16:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:Notability)