Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional chemical substances, A-M
The nominators reasoning that this is "|original research (from primary sources only)" demonstrates a misunderstanding of the actual policy, which says: "''Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources including primary sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is encouraged: this is 'source-based research,' and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia.''" Saying that this is |unencyclopedic is a matter of opinion not supported by policy, and to those who find this "disgusting", sorry but #CENSORED|Wikipedia is not censored. Finally, Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes explains why the possibility of a category does not preclude the validity of a list
— User:DHowell, 04:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:UNENCYC||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:No original research)