Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DKP (2nd nomination)
this is '''totally unsourced'''!  There are literally no sources in this this entire article - if this is seriously a "notable" and "enduring" concept, then where are the facts.  I could go through this with a {{Citation needed|date=July 2011}} gun, and literally every single fact would be suspect.  I mean, the ''lead'' of the article contains a factual assertion with no sourcing!  I can't believe people are willing to totally ignore policy and keep an article that violates policy so blatantly basically because |they like it.  Source it or delete it - don't dither around with content like this.  It's either encyclopedic, and you can source it, or it's unverifiable |original research and should be deleted
— User:Haemo, 01:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)