Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mega journal
The article shows multiple references to chapters/articles in books, RS enough to satisfy notability requirements per . Beyond these, there are conference proceedings, eprints, and blogs, some by respected experts like Jeffrey Beall. IEEE Access http://open.ieee.org/ happily declares itself a mega journal and a number of big science publishers have come out with their own mega journals. It seems that the academic publishing world has taken note of this phenomenon and this topic is likely to get more notable over time. The term has been used in the sources since at least 2011, so it doesn't fit the  mold of an editor or minor player in the field trying to push a neologism. The article itself is carefully, nay defensively, cited. Except for one dubious sentence, I don't see the claimed synthesis or original research, just a summarization of sources. A notable topic and an article with no major problems suggests keeping the article
— User:Mark, 04:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Notability)