Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scouting in Vatican City (2nd nomination)
no assertion of ''existence'', never mind notability, and per .  How in the hell could anyone vote to keep an article that basically says "There is no scouting in the Vatican City and it's unlikely there ever will be"????  Was any vestige of common sense applied?  The nonsensical argument that we need a Scouting article for every nation-state in the world, whether there is any active Scouting there or not, just, well, um, "because of completeness," is meretricious garbage that does nothing save to provide ample ammunition to Wikipedia's detractors, never mind damage the concept that closing admins pay attention to anything other than the voting tally
— User:RGTraynor, 15:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BULLSHIT (Wikipedia:Complete bollocks)