Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skeptic's Annotated Bible (2nd nomination)
This is rediculous. I closed this quite awhile ago, and another non admin opened it. I dont have a problem with a healthy debate, don't get me wrong here, but when it comes to someone trying to make a |Point someone needs to draw the line. Sources have been established, citations have been made, references added, but those who wish to destroy the article |don't like them. I would like to closing admin to also take a look at the attempted deletion history of the individuals who have asked for prior articles to be deleted. We are an encyclopedia, articles should be KEPT, NOT DELETED. Whomever wrote  and added something along the lines of "why don't you try to FIX an article instead?" was a fucking genius
— User:Dusti, 10:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:IDONTLIKE||WP:DELETE (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)