Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wale Ojo
my !vote is a keep due to information available on cyber-space which proves subject of the article is worthy of a stand alone article on the encylopedia. Now notwithstanding, this AFD is not in anyway "laughable" as termed by {{u|Oluwa2Chainz}}, reasons being, notability is relative & very subjective as so persons you may consider notable might not be notable to {{u|Thomas.W}} and if he decides to put it up for deletion he is very much entitled to do so. But just as said by {{u|Darreg}}, {{u|Jamie Tubers}}, {{u|Versace1608}} the articles subject is quite notable and no matter the standard you have set @{{u|Thomas.W}} to assertain notability of any persons with stand alone articles, wikipedia provides us with primary yardsticks such as  &  the article/its subject clearly passes this. This would end in a "Keep" obviously, you really aint need to push this any further, with that said, i would also want to commend your efforts on the fight against undisclosed paid editing & Sock puppets it is duly recognized
— User:Celestina007, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)