Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early 21st-century civil rights movement
The nomination statement, while extremely succinct, is correct. I commented about this article being synthesis Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Early_21st-century_civil_rights_movement|here at ORN and at the article's talk page. Everything discussed in this article is obviously noteworthy, but it's also all covered elsewhere. The article is cobbling together various current and recent events and treating them as a ''distinct'' "Early 21st century civil rights movement", which is |original research and for which there is little evidence in reliable sources. There is https://news3lv.com/news/local/black-lives-matter-protests-mark-historic-civil-rights-movement-unlv-professor-says this, but that is one professor, and he clearly is talking specifically about Black Lives Matter, which already has an article. There's also https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2020-06-12/new-civil-rights-movement-foreign-policy-win this, but this uses the word "maybe", and in any case we don't have enough to meet , nor can we get around the fact that gathering these current events under this label in the way the article does is synthesis. We need to avoid ecentism; the job of what to call this era and how to label its events falls to academic experts, not us Wikipedia editors. Any good and non-redundant material can be merged out to their respective topics
— User:Crossroads, 22:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:GNG||WP:R (Wikipedia:No original research)