Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is Genesis History? (2nd nomination)
The big question at the previous AfD seemed to be whether to treat this as a film or as something inseparable from its fringe content such that sources would need to meet the standards outlined at /. If the latter, well, there's basically nothing. The last AfD was closed according to the former, with several people stating unequivocally that it's notable as a film. Ok, so then the sources we need are reviews from reliable publications known for film criticism. If they are known not for film criticism but for pushing a particular ideology, it is not a reliable source for these purposes. Likewise, if it is an announcement of a screening with no coverage of the film itself, if it's a reworked press release, if it's evident the person writing the "review" hasn't even seen the film, then it's not sufficient. What we have is a veneer of notability by superficial local coverage, along with in-depth coverage limited to advocacy organizations/publications. Unfortunately, if the same numeric majority of participants show up to claim that it's notable because of a bunch of superficial and agenda-driven sources, we're probably going to head for the same result. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 12:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PSCI||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)