Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animals, Property, and the Law
per {{u|Notecardforfree}}; there are multiple independent  for the book, including the reviews in the Further reading section (and the source at the end of the Notes section). The lack of direct citation, except of the book itself, is an unrelated problem (but still a problem), and the claim to be "the first extensive jurisprudential treatment of animal rights", citing the foreword, isn't the basis of its notability:  is, which it clearly passes. &#8209;&#8209
— User:Yodin, 22:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)