Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Bey Barmada
Copying and pasting your own work into mainspace literally within minutes of having submitted it for AFC review in the first place is not the path to getting an article created. The article is not in a good enough state of quality to overlook that problem, however: as written, it is supported ''entirely'' by glancing namechecks of the subject's existence, not to content that's substantively ''about him'' for the purposes of helping to establish his notability. There are potentially valid notability claims here, but the article still has to be written and referenced better than this before it's actually allowed to go live — but the creator has the opportunity to keep working on the draft to make it better, so deleting this doesn't wreck their work. And the apparent  (creator's username directly indicates a family connection of some kind) is precisely the reason why we have to insist on proper process here, because it inherently calls the article's credibility into question if the sourcing isn't airtight. Obviously, no prejudice against future approval of the draft if it gets improved properly
— User:Bearcat, 21:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)