Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waagner-Biro
I'm curious how anybody could get to two keep votes and think these references are valid, particularly since they are in such a poor state. The de wikipedia articles references are also in a poor state and reflect the same failure in  particularly ,  that they do here. They are a major engineering outfit, widely reported and should have an articles, but it must be verifiable and it is not in its current state. There is a lot of coverage, e.g. of this type: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/luxury/drinking-and-dining/first-look-inside-legendary-london-club-annabels-unveils-55m/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/luxury/drinking-and-dining/first-look-inside-legendary-london-club-annabels-unveils-55m/ ''Assisting him in the £55m renovation are Viennese steel-and-glass engineering experts Waagner Biro''. Name mentions, lots of them. It needs much better than that
— User:scope_creep, 13:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)