Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Police stop, search, detention and arrest powers in the United Kingdom
as per CaveatLector, TenPound Hammer, RBlowes, Targeman, Espresso Addict, and GorillaWarfare.  Yes, it needs a bit of improvement, but that is ''not'' fD|Grounds for deletion.  I might add a legal disclaimer (a la Allocation questionnaire) or a link to isclaimer|the standard legal disclaimer.  It is Axiom|axionomic that "The law is vast and constantly changing."  I would argue that ''all'' legal articles need to updated periodically.  That is why we have a |WikiProject:Law.  That is also why I have here at WP in the first place -- to help my students.  If we deleted every legal article for the reason that it is out of date, WP would be bereft of legal research, and thus a valuable tertiary source for college (paralegal) and law students.  I am happy to jump in and fix it per |the Heyman doctrine
— User:Bearian, 21:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:D||WP:LAW||WP:HEY (Wikipedia:Attribution)