Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FactorDaily
The references are very poor, startup style PR and run-of-the-mill business news that don't prove the organisation is notable. The first references to https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/19/ambitious-new-media-startup-factordaily-aims-to-be-indias-wired/ fails . The second one is a passing mention and fails . The third ref is also very poor and doesn't pass /. The references provided above, are news stories that perhaps were  originated by the news outlet, but don't verify it as being notable, in own right. They are merely stories that originated there and were picked up by other news organisation. Anybody could have originated them. All that has been presented so far, is indicative of a very young new outlet, that hasinsufficient coverage to satisfy  or . If there was detailed reference available that passed /, they would have been present, but they're not. It is non-notable at the current time
— User:scope_creep, 17:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:SIRS||WP:V||WP:SIRS||WP:NCORP||WP:SIRS||WP:NCORP||WP:SIRS (Wikipedia:Notability)