Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sex symbols (4th nomination)
There's no meaning or consistency.  There are various lists of sex symbols, and it's fine to cover and summarize them in various articles, separately.  But, we can't mix and match different sources using different criterion.  I don't want a lists of people who are stupid, ugly, pretty, dorky, nerdy, rude, polite, honest, dishonest, competent, incompetent, good, bad people etc...  I can find an endless abundance of sources for lists of each of these types of things, but the lists mean nothing.  A list of "sex symbols" is , as you're creating a fresh list, that no single source would ever put together, or approve of.  It's wanton misinterpretation to mix a source calling somebody a sex symbol because of their body, with somebody who bases it on their mind, or personality, or how they move, or how they dress, or maybe they just wanted to pay a compliment.  Just because two sources use the same literal words , does not always mean they are talking about the same thing
— User:Thivierr, 23:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)