Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neg (seduction)
Ok, but what are the policy reasons behind your vote to delete? Terms such as categorical imperative also have no meaning outside a particular community and somewhat resemble the more general use of similar words, but they are worth including in wikipedia because they are written about by |notable people and in |reliable sources. Same thing with neg. Neg is discussed in other articles, but that discussion is not as well sourced as the current version of this article
— User:SecondSight, 20:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)