Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Mase
I agree that  is being overused as a keep argument and it's not a strong defence. However multiple high quality independent sources have decided that she is notable enough for them to report on her in her own right. We on WP may have a view that they are only doing so because of who her former husband was, but this is second guessing the independent source's motives. The sources exist, they comment in depth on her, they are independent and multiple. It's not our job to tell newspapers etc that they are mistakenly according her inhgerited notability
— User:Kim, 09:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)