Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate Gothic
I agree, the A7 deletion may have been a mistake, but I disagree that the article passes  and  generally. The only source currently in the article that passes  would be the http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/fashion/21CODES.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/C/Colman,%20David&pagewanted=all NYT article, which mentions the term "corp-goth" once, and in the context of a company's product line. There are one or two other mentions and a smattering of cursory mentions in other mainstream media. The argument here would be whether these constitute "multiple significant" mentions. &mdash
— User:Mendaliv, 05:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)