Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stochastic terrorism
Again, I'm not sure why everyone is still going on about google scholar hits. Notability doesn't require scholarly sources specifically, just |reliable ones. It's more than a  since the sources actually discuss the term and apply it to real-life figures. DICTDEF |evens says: "such articles must go beyond what would be found in a dictionary entry (definition, pronunciation, etymology, use information, etc.), and include information on the social or historical significance of the term." If you're claiming this article just merely states "definition, pronunciation, etymology, use information", then you haven't read it. I implore everyone to take a minute to actually examine the sources used instead of bandwagoning. (it's a stub, so obviously the article itself won't be as fleshed out as the sources it's based on
— User:Opencooper, 23:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:DICTDEF||WP:WORDISSUBJECT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)