Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoyChat
I've added news paper article links to the article which show that journalists have been talking about BoyChat since 1998. With all the articles posted (4 or more at the time of this comment) this article easily meets , there needs to be some integration to be truly verifiable but the shear number of media mentions allows the article to meet . Since  and  are met via '''multiple''' real-world '''non-trivial''' publications which are secondary sources this article meets . The article still needs a lot of a work and seems to skirt around the issue that all the reliable sources say that BoyChat is chat for pedophiles. This article seems to avoid stating verifiable facts about the website. Then on a non-policy note I'd like to say that having an article on BoyChat on Wikipedia allows people to read about it without actually going there. Hopefully wikipedia can give people unbiased information (they are pedophiles) about BoyChat rather than users having to interpret their FAQ. In Summary '''please re-read the article, please view ALL of the references and external links''', you'll the article passes ,  and 
— User:Quirex, 06:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)