Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Essien Etok
WP:BIO and  both require sources where the person is the subject of the article - |you can't be notable just for being somone's friend. Looking at the sources, http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/aug/31/michael-jackson-doctor-defence-gutted this in the Guardian is probably the highest quality source, but only mentions Etok very briefly. Sources that are more directly about her (but still really about Michael Jackson) like http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/news/a170311/jackson-begged-british-doc-for-drugs.html this and http://www.contactmusic.com/news/doctor-took-pill-boxes-from-jacksons-hotel-suite-pharmacy_1113697 this are based off interviews that Etok gave to tabloid sources such as ''The Mirror'' and ''Entertainment Tonight'' - not what we want to be using as sources for BLPs or to establish notability. None of the references in the 'Early life and career' section are sufficient to establish notability and  is clearly not met either - she has an h-index http://www.journalogy.net/Author/19436826/susan-essien-etok of 2
— User:Smartse, 22:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:INHERIT||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)