Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGM-Pathé Communications (2nd nomination)
per improvements and "solid consensus for keep" of this new article at the last AFD |just last July.  As was pointed out then, there is no need to overburden the suggested target with so much additional and well-sourced information... information about this unique and historical aspect that would then be culled from MGM as . When an https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/109.148.185.204 anonymous one-day SPA IP tags something for a merge discussion, a lack of discussion tends to show a lack of consensus for a merge,  and a "let's merge it anyway" is not a proper #REASON|deletion rationale.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 12:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:UNDUE||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)