Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bristol/Bath to South Coast Study
to Bristol and Bath articles. Evidence of a significant amount of coverage in independent, reliable sources is lacking, and I haven't been able to find any additional sources that would counter this impression. Government reports and government commentary on government studies do not constitute independent coverage, in my view. Outside of government circles, there's only a smattering of coverage, mostly residents voicing their opinions on planning and policy. This, too, does not rise to the level of significant coverage in my view. I tend to agree with Martinvl. The most practical course would be to merge selectively into the Bristol and Bath articles, taking care that the merge does not give undue weight to the report. A sentence or two or three may be warranted, depending on the context. As a separate article, though, we are not yet at . I don't think it's necessary to invoke  here because this material has a suitable home elsewhere, and need not be wholly removed from the encyclopedia under the guidelines
— User:Batard0, 06:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Notability)