Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossohyal
perfectly valid  (which I suggest some editors read). As modified by Chessy999, has context that will allow expansion. Google Scholar results suggest that should not be a problem. I do not think it is appropriate to tag just-created articles as dicdefs or unexpandable just because they are obscure and brief
— User:Dhartung, 22:46, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:STUB (Wikipedia:Stub)