Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarring and feathering in popular culture
because the topic is actually treated in secondary sources. It seems to me that all critizism so far is directe toward the current state of the article, which is not actually decisive for the question of deletion, and that noone has yet done a proper  search. I ask the nominator and the deletion voters to have a look at e.g. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=%22Tarring+and+feathering%22+%22popular+culture%22&hl=de&as_sdt=0,5 these Google scholar hits. The sources vary widely in scope and length of treatment (and respective use of "popular culture"), but they should be way enough to fullfil the |WP:GNG requirement of providing more than "a few sentences" worth of material, and therefore also of . https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/151298/TRNINIC-DISSERTATION-2013.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Here for example is a whole PhD thesis about the topic. Do you need me to provide more examples
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:WHYN||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)