Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FieldTrip
Even though I was the article's original PRODder, I am going to !vote neutral. The reason for this is that the article describing this software has already been cited over 100 times (Web of Science; over 200 times in the less precise Google Scholar), despite having been published very recently (2011). If the article creators could provide us with an independent (|reliable) source discussing or reviewing this toolbox, I would change for a "keep
— User:Randykitty, 16:05, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)