Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Lomax
The sourcing is problematic. So far I havent seen one high quality source. They tend to be about his discoveries, instead of him. There is not single decent  source, that I put a finger on, and say yip, it is absolutely encyclopaedic, he is notable and is worth an article
— User:Scope, 17:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:No original research)