Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tane Ikai (2nd nomination)
to one of the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia. There seems to be more coverage here than usual, but nothing that justifies a stand-alone article per . Previous nominations are irrelevant (unless made in quick succession) because |consensus can change and there is no policy that states being the oldest anything is automatically notable; it comes down to sourcing, which in this case I feel is insufficient for a stand-alone article
— User:Canadian, 21:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:CCC (Wikipedia:Notability)