Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stealing Mary
The problem is that the only sources out there are either primary, junk, or cannot be used to show notability in any context. There are primary sources, but no amount of primary sources can show that a film passes notability guidelines. What we would need would be coverage in reliable sources such as a news article commenting about the film, a movie review by a reliable source that isn't involved with the film in any context, or mention in a book published through a reputable publisher. That just isn't out there and while the film did receive some funding from notable enough companies, that doesn't give notability as |notability is not inherited. As far as saying  and would merit deletion if this goes through, then odds are that they would merit deletion even if a dozen RS were found that proved notability. It would be a different story if we were arguing this point over an article that had 3-4 RS that passed Wikipedia's guidelines, but in this instance we're not and we can't keep an article that doesn't have sources
— User:Tokyogirl79, 03:46, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)