Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixelism Art Movement
Again, this is all speculative (as per  at best. The Hainley article only mentions "pixelism" as a general description, not a reference to an actual movement. The Frayling and Serota endorsements are unsourced (the last link is actually just the curatorial statement which lists the same Frayling and Serota reference without source). The Chang and ''Asimov's Science Fiction'' references again fall under speculation, with no evidence of an actual movement. Unfortunately, this still fails per  and 
— User:Freshacconci, 09:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOR||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)