Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetralibro
for failing .  there's only 105 distinct Ghits here, so it's easy to sift.  There's a lot of press releases, but no multiple non-trivial third-party articles about the concept; no awards, no evidence of genericization of the name, and so on.  As the article is solely about Tetralibra, there's no way to be encyclopedic, or not be an ad.  Since the only documentation are Tetralibra press releases, this raises the failure of {WP:V as well
— User:Tychocat, 15:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)