Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (6th nomination)
Basically, per arguments along the line of those made by Noren and others.  Most lists that we have are self-explanatory.  Every criteria in this particular list here is sourced, but examining people's quotations to try to classify them on to this list is classic .  Also the listing of criteria is not exhaustive... there are other bullets in the http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/005.htm Third Assessment Report summary which contrarians could disagree with.  This article has always been problematic for exactly that reason... and how do you deal with converted contrarians like Richard A. Muller who have said things opposing consensus in the past but now explicitly endorse it?  You have to make some sort of an arbitrary decision in a lot of places.  And lists shouldn't work that way
— User:Sailsbystars, 15:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTHESIS (Wikipedia:No original research)