Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Martin (TV producer)
without prejudice against recreation if and when somebody can do better than this. He does have credible notability ''claims'', but what's lacking here is the sourcing necessary to get him over  ''for'' them — and on a ProQuest search, I'm not finding anything stronger at this time. I can find a few glancing mentions of his existence in coverage of ''Slasher'', but nothing that's ''about him'' for the purposes of demonstrating his standalone notability — and even the Gemini/CSA nominations, which are his strongest basis for inclusion, still require some sources ''about'' him, not just |user-generated verification on his own IMDb profile, before they actually clinch an article. Merely ''stating'' a notability claim does not exempt the person from having to have the |reliable sourcing needed to ''carry'' an article — he'd absolutely be eligible to have an article that was sourced ''properly'', but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to ''exempt'' him from having to have any reliable source coverage about him anywhere. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that ''anybody'' can edit, nothing stops "anybody" from adding information to our articles that's ''damaging'' to the subject's reputation, or even outright ''false'' — so we require reliable sourcing, not just the making of an unsourced or poorly sourced notability ''claim'', before we can actually keep an article, because that's the ''only'' mechanism we have for keeping our articles accurate and non-defamatory
— User:Bearcat, 17:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:USERG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)