Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Felton
I came across something else that might be relevant to this discussion.   states that local newspapers covering college athletes, even though they are reliable sources, do not neccesarily help to determine the notability of a college athlete.  "It has already been accepted that professional athletes, regardless of their accomplishments in their field, may have articles. But local newspapers also cover high school and college athletes. In every city and town, there are several high schools and colleges and papers that cover them. So inevitably, these athletes will receive coverage."  Additionally  "is not a policy, but may be consulted for assistance during and AfD discussion."  The ''Toronto Star'' and ''Buffalo News'' articles certainly fall outside this.  They, however, only commented on him because he was signed to the Bills.  Whether this is or isn't enough for him to be notable seems like a very fine line to me - just like whether or not he is still a professional athlete because he was signed even though he didn't play a single actual game.  Also my former statement about him not "standing out" was poor wording on my part.  Notability is not subjective.  I'm just still not totally convinced the he is (or perhaps isn't) notable
— User:Narthring, 01:30, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:MILL||WP:MILL (Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill)