Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebTrain
It is strange for an article about a company that sells things not to say how much it sold. The company's website is coy about turnover and capitalisation as well. It seems to me what is missing from this article (other than promotional spin about its products) is real-world content, context, critisism or analysis of the company's development and market growth. It seems to me this article, like most , puts the cart before the horse: there is an underlying presumption that the company has sold product, yet the article provides no evidence that it has sold so much as a sausage. What we have instead is an "Impact" section, which demonstrates certain organisations have used the product, but not actually bought it. Basically this article provides us with lots of promotional ''stuff'', but is short on real-world ''information''. A mention in a PC magazine is not evidence of notability
— User:Gavin, 07:57, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SPAM (Wikipedia:Spam)