Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Protocol (video game)
This boils down to  and . Keep voters ought to really focus on this article's merits rather than attacking the nominator or trying to point out that other articles are in a worse shape. As for gaming the system, recreating a |salted page under a slightly different name to avoid the permanent protection on Beyond Protocol would be a fair case of pot calling kettle black if we weren't |assuming good faith. Last but not least, the policies ''are'' binding, in particular |verifiability through |independent reliable sources. I kindly suggest addressing this issue rather than pointing at other poor articles or continuing with the ad hominem against the nominator
— User:MLauba, 23:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:SALT||WP:AGF||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)