Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badflower
No coverage to suggest Significance or notability. what coverage there is either a primary, unreliable, or if it is secondary it's at best  and  in a digital world every band will have some coverage. but the existence of a shred of coverage is not "Significant" notability guidelines rise with the times. 10 years from now we will demand more evidence than we do today. but today Badflower misses the notability mark of encyclopedic importance
— User:Bryce, 17:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MILL||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill)