Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Le Blanc (historian)
It looks like  would be easier to pass than  for this sort of material. But for that, I think we should distinguish the books that are mostly others' writings edited by the subject from the books written by the subject. I did find another published review of one of his actual books http://www.jstor.org/stable/27672903. But putting that together with the one mentioned by the nominator is not, I think, enough, especially because of the specialized audience of these reviews compared to e.g. the newspaper reviews more typically expected in . Certainly if this is kept it needs to be trimmed down to material that can be given reliable sources; for instance, I think most of the "Scholarship" section needs to go
— User:David, 17:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)