Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manspreading
there are enough reliable sources. While the concept may not live into the next century (though who knows?), it's certainly not a mere ''internet'' trend.  Of course the article is a magnet for angry white man|angry white men — a few minutes ago, I removed a new and |pointy gallery, which has already been reinserted from another IP — but we have many articles of which that is true. Perhaps semiprotection should be considered. I don't understand why the last Delete voter above wants sources that address "mansplaining", but perhaps that was a mere typo or autocorrect error
— User:Bishonen, 13:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)