Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional companies (3rd nomination)
This should go because of #INDISCRIMINATE|the indiscriminate nature of the collection. It is a selective collection based on what a few editors find personally interesting. There are thousands of times as many fictional companies as the ones listed here, so it is unmaintainable. No independent and reliable source is presented to show that this particular sample of fictional companies is more notable than all the omitted ones. Also the article fails #IINFO and #DIRECTORY. The best arguement presented for its retention is that it is interesting, which bumps into the essay Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
— User:Edison, 18:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)