Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonchain (2nd nomination)
Fails  as well as  (#Independent sources) and  (#Significant coverage). Notability is not |not inherited so attempts to tie this to Disney for notability is vain and fails . What I do see is |promotionism not only on this non-mined cryptocurrency but as a whole in some |attempt to list all 1600+ cryptocurrencies on Wikipedia as being notable simply because they exist with mostly |primary sources and some Wikipedia:Trivial mentions|passing mention in reliable sources. Where is the |bottom limit on notability? This is established |GNG: {{tq|If a topic has received |significant coverage in |reliable sources that are WP:independent|independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.}} I do not see that criteria being met
— User:Otr500, 12:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:INHERITORG||WP:NOTPRO||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:BARE||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:primary sources (Wikipedia:Notability)