Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Really Happened (2nd nomination)
Again, your contention that the site does not meet  criteria is a blatant falsehood. As has been noted and cited in any number of ways in both discussions, it clearly does. And if "anonymous comments" will always be disregarded, then your "wiki" should cease allowing "anonymous comments" to be posted. Threatening to remove such comments from sources 'outside' your 'group' because they post comments you don't approve of (or agree with) shows you have a problem with adverse opinion on some level. And that problem can, should, and will be construed as "editorial bias" in many quarters. Thus, if your policy is to remain truly "neutral" as a good "reference" site, then you shouldn't even be having this discussion. If you want to remain credible, you need to take your personality out of the discussion
— User:64, 23:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)