Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod of Seven Parts (2nd nomination)
and nominator should be warned of  violation. Added afterward: The closing admin. will probably note that several of the "Keep" !votes, including my own, primarily mention the potential  violation as a justification for speedily closing this discussion.  There are, however, enough ignoring the obvious bad form and commenting on the article itself, which is a good thing, and there are still significant keep-favoring editors either way.  I also want to add "per my arguments in the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rod_of_Seven_Parts|last AfD" for the record
— User:Zahakiel, 04:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)