Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important operas
Definition or no definition, I still maintain the title - and therefore the fundamental premise of the article - is POV/OR. At the very least, it should be renamed. The article itself, if it passes AfD, will need to be overhauled, because it is written like a music review - very unencyclopedic - and filled with rampant opinions, observations,  and , with language like '''"A moving work"''', '''"Mozart takes on Gluck at his own game with this richly scored work"''', '''"memorable"''', '''"ethereal beauty of Mozart’s perfect setting"''', '''"hilarious comedy"''', '''"The Wolf's Glen scene will still send shivers down your spine"''', '''"arguably the best"''', '''"all guarantee an exciting night at the opera"''', '''"We won't reveal what happens in the Epilogue"''', '''"touching moments lead the audience to the inevitable, heartrending conclusion"''', etc., etc. I mean, come ''on''. This is ''not'' an NPOV article in title, premise, or content in any way, shape or form
— User:Wikipediatrix, 02:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEASEL||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)