Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat people and dog people
The sourcing on the article's talk page is sufficient to me to warrant an article. I don't feel like  applies, its an established term that has been used for a long time and used by a ton of reliable, third party sources. This isn't some zany word some kid made up on Youtube last week or something, the type of thing NOTNEO is usually trying to prevent. I'm not opposed to splitting it off into 2 separate articles, as Aspirex states, but I think that should be a separate discussion that occur sbased on how things are looking once its been expanded out some (hopefully soon
— User:Sergecross73, 20:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)