Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Ricky Coward
Vanity article which fails  and . Most of the references are simply a link which establishes the existence of the thing referenced (various boxers, the Camden County Prosecutor's Office), and do not mention Coward, meaning that the majority of the text is primary research. Others are passing mentions in minor articles about other matters, aside from the single 'HITC' source from 2013, which is not itself a notable news source as far as I can see.  The only reference in which Coward is the sole subject is a non-independent advertisement for his services, which advises on where one might purchase his DVDs. In sum, conducting padwork with a number of pro boxers is not sufficient to have a wikipedia entry about you, no matter how you fluff it
— User:El, 18:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NBOX (Wikipedia:Notability)