Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitt Romney Cranbrook incident
a number of editors are quoting  in support of deletion. There doesn't actually appear to be anything in  which relates to whether a standalone article should or shouldn't exist. This aspect of policy is actually about ensuring that articles don't give undue prominence to a tangential aspect of a subject or minority view ''in comparison to'' the prominence given to the main aspects / the majority views. Whether a subject is worthy of a whole article is the realm of the , not . This is something for the closing admin to bear in mind
— User:SP, 17:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:UNDUE||WP:GNG||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)