Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Thomas O'Higgins
WRT "authenticated sources" -- sources do not have to be online to be considered .  There are sources where there is a formal or informal consensus that they are not , even though they have a surface appearance of being legitimate news organizations.  In this particular case I don't see anyone offering a reason why we should not consider the references this article uses to be .  This is the first time, in my four years on the wikipedia, I have seen the term "authenticated sources" used.  I'd welcome an explanation of what respondent thinks this term means, and who they think we should count on for that authentication?  Who do they propose would have the responsibility to initiate this authentication
— User:Geo, 16:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)