Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristis
A specific epithet like this an adjective and is an intrinsic part of a name; it is ''not'' comparable with the a name like Robert. The epithet "tristis" is nonsensical to use by itself to refer to a species; it is like referring to New York City as just "New" or Long Island as just "Long". This "article" is still essentially an expanded disambiguation page and "tristis" (or any of the other specific epithets that keep cropping up as new disambig pages) are definitely partial title matches, which is the first thing mentioned in the list of "What not to include" in the Wikipedia Disambiguation guidelines, see . I have been unable to find any print sources where the specific epithet "tritis" is used by itself. As an article this would be like a list of towns that have the word "South" as part of their name. It is unencyclopedic. I agree strongly with User: Deor and the examples of previous AfDs he gives are extremely relevant here
— User:Invertzoo, 13:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DABNOT (Wikipedia:Disambiguation)