Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heretic's fork
As I said in my earlier comments, enough pre-Wikipedia usage can be found to challenge any idea of this having been placed as a  article. However, my searches in various places have failed to locate |solid sources to provide positive support for an article about a C16-17 inquisitor’s object – and even when I was confident of finding such, I was still expecting to finish by recommending merger into a list of instruments, much as {{u|Rhododendrites}} suggests. Alternatively, following the suggestion by {{u|Hydronium Hydroxide}} and {{u|Peterkingiron}}, the article might cover the topic as a cultural idea, such as in the Golub artwork, but would I think need to |avoid original research by citing a source which had already investigated the topic in those terms. All in all, I wouldn’t be uncomfortable with a "no consensus" outcome, but can’t make a strong positive argument for retention
— User:AllyD, 18:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:HOAX||:WP:RS||:WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes)