Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Raymar
Nothing stated here hands him an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing, but this is based ''entirely'' on |primary sources that do not count as valid support for notability. If he could be shown to pass , then this would be a different matter — but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on the sourcing
— User:Bearcat, 16:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)