Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Vernola
the consensus at the RfC was pretty clear that this distinction is not suitable for inclusion within itself, and the RfC was widely advertised with much more participation than at these AfD debates. Because of this sourcing requirement no subjects get automatic inclusion or "inherited notability", which is basically the argument that some editors are making above. I haven't found the level of coverage necessary to meet the GNG. This article also fails , as it is only deals with future speculation about a distinction that isn't notable in itself
— User:Themfromspace, 22:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)