Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wet paint sign (2nd nomination)
There are plenty of sources out there. Being "unencyclopedic" is only a matter of opinion. The |General notability guideline is what determines whether or not something is included, not the opinions of a few deletionists whose point of view is that something they have no interest in is "silly" or otherwise inappropriate in an encylopedia. In general, articles with sources should be kept. Those given the |just not notable or |unencyclopedic arguments should never be deleted. These are empty arguments showing nothing but |disdain out of one's personal taste
— User:Shaliya, 21:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:JNN||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)