Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edelweiss (visual novel)
Appears to fail  and , I guess. Japanese Wikipedia article is not much better. I see some blog reviews but also a few less bloggish, so it seems sources do exist. One : https://rpgvaliant.com/game-reviews/edelweiss-review-a-ticket-to-paradise/. Another: https://www.uk-anime.net/Games/Edelweiss_(slash)_Edelweiss:_Eiden_Fantasia_(PC).html. One more: http://www.gamingtarget.com/article.php?artid=9420. Not sure if they are all reliable, but this may squeak by. (Also, some additional reviews seem to be from 18+ sites and may contain 18+ content, this one for exammple is blocked at my workplace: https://fapservice.com/edelweiss-visual-novel-review/). I am open to the discussion on whether those are reliable, but hmmm, I think there is enough out there to make it pass notability requirements. But best to review those sources outside one's workplace, lol
— User:Piotrus, 06:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)