Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream Pod 9
after DRV and relisting: Note that the product review from ''Dragon'' was added after the first Delete response above, and although it was added before the second Delete response (which seemed to misunderstand that the company is still actively producing products the way it once was, although I am not sure if they are even active at all to be honest) and I do not think the user took that source into account.  The relevance in my opinion of that source is not so much that it includes reviews of the games, but that it comments on the Silhouette system, which does not have its own article, and is the core element of the company's games, and I believe that an independent source such as that is necessary to include in the article so that we have more about the Silhouette system.  I added the source ''Designers & Dragons'' after both delete votes, which contains several pages of information and commentary on the company.  I will AGF from Hobit's response that the self-published "Dice Rolling Mechanisms in RPGs" comes from a reliable author in the field of CS math.  I believe that the commentary from "Next Generation" magazine – an independent reliable source from the video game industry – is most useful in its contrasting the smaller DP9 with the much larger FASA, as the video game publisher at the time had gone from licensing FASA's BattleTech to DP9's Heavy Gear.  I have not seen the "PC Gamer" source to know what it says about the company.  I believe that the above is enough to meet the minimum for the , and thus I affirm my initial Keep, although if consensus ultimately disagrees with me, then I think we have enough to show that rather than deleting it should be '''merged''' somewhere.  Meanwhile, I will see what else I can do to find more sources for this topic, which are likely not easily found online due to how long ago this company was at its peak
— User:BOZ, 22:14, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)