Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 826
Easily passes  and the in-depth coverage spanned years and thus passing WP:EVENT's .  Once again a misuse of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT.  WP:NOTNEWS states very clearly it it meant to prevent articles on topics such as "routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities..."  There is nothing "routine" about, outside of BOAC Flight 911, arguably the most notable clear air turbulence event in modern aviation history (AA 587 went down because of wake turbulence, not clear air turbulence).  WP:EVENT also is meant to preclude topics that only received "routine reporting" as this topic certainly has not.  Massive worldwide coverage when the event happened http://www.nytimes.com/1997/12/29/world/jet-hits-turbulence-110-hurt-and-a-woman-dies.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9712/28/japan.turbulence.update/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-12-29/news/9712290057_1_clear-air-turbulence-narita-united-spokeswoman and years of coverage afterward.https://books.google.com/books?id=OHd1AfeqPAkC&pg=PA146&dq=united+airlines+flight+826+clear+air+turbulence&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAWoVChMI2LPnurnpyAIVCJuICh3VDgz5#v=onepage&q=united%20airlines%20flight%20826%20clear%20air%20turbulence&f=falsehttp://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/08/03/inexplicable-deadly-turbulence.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/12/business/12turbulence.html?_r=0  And
— User:The, 03:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PERSISTENCE (Wikipedia:Notability)