Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediamerx
For me, the TVWeek "Digital Dealmakers" profile of the company CEO and the GigaOM item are start-up proposition coverage; for example the latter concludes ''"Will it work? We shall see. For now the company has four people and a small amount of funding, but to meet its ambitions it will need more than technological innovation."'': does that either claim or establish attained notability? After a couple of years the company appears to have https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kaptur/startup-aims-to-kaptur-bigger-slice-of-lucrative-wedding-market-idUSTRE7A373620111104 morphed into Kaptur, seeking position in the wedding photo market, and then to https://www.ahalife.com/press/2013/07/24/pandodaily/why-would-ahalife-a-luxury-commerce-site-buy-kaptur-a-photo-sharing-app have been acquired by :Ahalife, and to have been regarded as a start-up throughout. (The other venture described in the text, Sportpass.tv, still exists, though its "About" page consists of "Lorem ipsum" content, so it is unclear who operates it.) I don't see anything sufficient for the current  standards
— User:AllyD, 12:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)