Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germ-X
to Vi-Jon Laboratories, which presently has only one sentence about the product and will thus improve that article. Interestingly, per this St. Louis Public Radio article, Germ-X is a http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/politically-speaking-after-2012-loss-john-brunner-talks-about-road-back-electoral-politics "very popular" product, but overall source coverage may not be adequate to support a standalone article. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/T_Rohrig/publication/6660451_Detection_of_Ethylglucuronide_in_Urine_following_the_Application_of_Germ-X/links/54db8a840cf23fe133ad4b25.pdf This scholarly source from the ''Journal of analytical toxicology'' provides |significant coverage. Some book sources found include https://books.google.com/books?id=z9mcBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA189&dq=%22Germ-X%22+sanitizer&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4n5qE6pjNAhUD6WMKHY1XBrsQ6AEINDAA#v=onepage&q=%22Germ-X%22%20sanitizer&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=cjUWuvBkg2wC&pg=PA31&dq=%22Germ-X%22+sanitizer&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4n5qE6pjNAhUD6WMKHY1XBrsQ6AEIOjAB#v=onepage&q=%22Germ-X%22%20sanitizer&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=KT23BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA12&dq=%22Germ-X%22+sanitizer&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4n5qE6pjNAhUD6WMKHY1XBrsQ6AEIRTAD#v=onepage&q=%22Germ-X%22%20sanitizer&f=false, but the depth of coverage is not significant. http://www.kcbd.com/story/11542247/we-find-out-which-hand-sanitizer-works-the-best This source from KCBD News provides around a few paragraphs about the topic
— User:Northamerica1000, 16:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)