Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic University Law Review
Appears to be a significant journal in its field.  is nonsense -- "Other stuff exists" can indeed be a reasonable argument for keeping, particularly if similar articles have existed for a long time and been exposed to a large group of editors. That's called "precedent". Of course no two articles are exactly alike, but it is a useful comparison to see how well or poorly similar articles have been accepted by the community
— User:Strikehold, 18:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)