Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meditation for Spiritual Unfoldment
no claim of notability in the article, questionable whether existing sources are enough to provide verifiability.  The first "reference" is from UKPRwire, and is just the group's promotional release, not a |reliable source.  The second "reference" is the group's own website, also not the kind of source that can establish notability.  That leaves the article with just two mentions in a single Cyprus newspaper.  Perhaps there are multiple featured coverage in reliable sources, but this article should be kept only if some are found and cited.  Before I get accused of hating and being at war, I'm not making any value judgment about the group or its practices; I meditate, especially to avoid getting upset with people who think that their most important function is getting their special interest covered in Wikipedia.  Such a priority leads people to suspect that the true goal is promotion, not spiritual improvement
— User:Barno, 21:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)