Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slinky Malinki Open The Door
Again, it is simply not true to say that no independent reliable sources cover this topic. Stating this again and again for articles about books does lead me to wonder about how much  has been done. Similarly, citing Google search results is not a valid deletion argument - at a minimum, searches should be made in journals and digitised newspapers of the time. I will add sources, but as I said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slinky Malinki, I would suggest that if this and other Slinky Malinki books do not individually meet Wp notability guidelines, Slinky Malinki (cat) would
— User:RebeccaGreen, 12:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)