Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth United
I am unable to understand the subtleties of the notability of this organization. The notability is quite an abstract issue. One issue may be notable to you and one may not. You can not  prove the non notability of any entity just by saying that the corresponding wikipedia article does not have third party sources. At least the article Youth United has a lot of sources referenced from its official website, and in many a cases, excluding or including wikipedia, official website is taken as the official and authentic reference. regarding the Google search thing please refer in |''here''. I am aware of this policy WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but it does not mean that these articles are still to be overlooked after having noticed. This is a registered NGO having certified charter and bye-laws. The offical website cites these information only and challenging the authenticity of a certified charter is uncalled for. This matter is quite irrelevant for wikipedia administrators that what are the goals and activities of Youth United.I request you to take the matter more seriously, so that we may finally reach to a valid conclusion and hence close the discussion. sincerely
— User:Extolmonica, 20:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: :WP:GOOGLEHITS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)