Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASIOC
The number of |single purpose accounts flooding this debate has, of course, influenced my decision. But mainly the lack of a significant, third-party reference that has this group as the subject of the article leads me to say we should boot it. Also, the article is skirting #G11|our blatent advertising speedy delete criterion, and stealing from a charity never appeals
— [[User talk:Redvers|REDVEЯS]]''' is always ready to dynamically make tea, 21:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPA||WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)