Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Vance (British politician)
The references here aren't cutting it in terms of making him notable enough for inclusion just for being an unsuccessful candidate. Two of them are |blogs, not reliable sources; two are his own |primary source social networking and "staff contributor" profiles, not reliable sources; one is a Q&A interview in which he's speaking about something other than himself, which is not a notability-supporting source as he isn't its ''subject''; and one is a raw table of election data, which is not a notability-supporting source as he isn't its subject. And the sources which are actually both reliable and about him aren't supporting any substantive notability claim — most are simply the ''expected'' coverage that every candidate in every district in the entire United Kingdom could always show, and the only one that's actually doing something is a single book review which isn't enough to singlehandedly make him notable as a writer in lieu of his not being a notable politician. Nope, this cuts no ice
— User:Bearcat, 07:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLOGS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Verifiability)