Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White American (2nd nomination)
I don't see a compelling reason to delete here. The nominator called it "one giant, crufty, -laden  disaster." Perhaps the article was in a completely different state at the time the nomination was made, because I don't see any of that at all; I see good sources from the US census and sociologists. I do see a couple of statements with the dreaded "citation needed" tag, but that in itself is not a general reflection of the state of the article. I would think that, by now, the nominator would know that "it's cruft" is one of the arguments that we are explicitly to avoid in deletion nominations. That's simply a pejorative term that means "of little general interest", but I hardly find that relevant here, as ethnicity is certainly of general interest
— User:Kansan, 16:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)