Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Art controversy (2nd nomination)
The lead says the article concerns "a domain name ownership dispute". Therefore, standards of notability for a ''domain name ownership dispute'' (a trademark dispute) should apply.  shows that the article is not notable. For example, here is a much more notable http://www.odt.co.nz/lifestyle/food-wine/59257/review-brewer-bows-db-pressure trademark dispute where a product had to be renamed, while the dispute in this article was resolved by the web site displaying "not affiliated with Wikipedia". Per , the fact that there have been news reports of an incident is not a reason to have an encyclopedic article on the incident, and per , we should not create articles that celebrate disruptions or misuse of Wikipedia
— User:Johnuniq, 09:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:DENY (Wikipedia:Notability)