Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
I'm inclined to keep. However, to evaluate the article from the standpoint of Wikipedia policy, I would like to know whether these scientists are expressing a "significant minority" or a "|fringe" position per ? As many folks know, "mainstream" is a WP term of art, contrasted with fringe. If the "mainstream" wording implies that these are fringe opinions, I can see that this could be a notable fringe. However, if these opinions constitute a "significant minority," then it is much harder to justify a separate article on a single POV. (A significant minority would cover scientific opinions that are carried well enough in peer-reviewed journals, even though they don't sway most of the audience.) So, which is it
— User:HG, 07:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)