Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David J. Strachman
The book the subject wrote is notable. It is stocked by the http://encore.law.yale.edu/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1236701__SActions+and+defenses+--+United+States.__P0,1__Orightresult__X3;jsessionid=7071C1E543BA7C80A34E8E14BE96E598?lang=eng&suite=cobalt Yale Law library and http://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/7705533 Stanford Law library (Crown library). I saw one review http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Wisconsin_Lawyer&template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&contentid=81566 here. Those libraries stock only notable books, and also note the book has gone into a second edition. There is also scattered coverage in the http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE1D61030F93BA3575AC0A96E9C8B63&ref=victormarrero NY Times, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/17/AR2006071701177.html Washington Post, another http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/11/AR2008021102627.html Washington Post article, in http://books.google.com/books?id=w3ouAQAAIAAJ a book, and as a contributor to http://www.newjurist.com/writer-corner.html New Jurist. Enough coverage in independent, reliable, third-party sources to pass . If the subject wants the article gone, he should contact OTRS; we have no way of verifying how genuine nom's claim is, nor whether we are legally required to delete the article for whatever reason (policy, per se, doesn't ask us to
— User:Churn, 16:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)