Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Rhyde Rhodes
as probable hoax per discussion above, and per  because it consists solely of unreferenced material on a possibly living person.  is policy, not a guideline, and it is quite clear that it is up to an editor who adds material to provide the sources to justify its inclusion.As an aside, I regret the tendency at AfD to treat that requirement as if it were inverted, requiring other editors to spend a lot of time trying to second-guess the editor who created the article. The edit box for a new article says in bold print "Articles that do not cite reliable published sources are likely to be deleted"; it does not say "don't worry about referencing article, because other editors will devote huge amounts of time to trying to assess whether there were some sources you could have used or whether this is just something you made up
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 05:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:V (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)