Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of kemalism
Wheew, there are a lot of POVFORK shouts and it's too bad that the creator has been blocked for a week for edit warring and 3RR. Regardless of what the author nationalistic-POV-biased intention when (s)he started the article, I investigated again #REASON for this AfD debate. There's no single item there as the basis for the article deletion. Not even for a POV! Now, if some editors feel the unreliability of sources given in this article, I'd looked one of the links from the article. Especially, http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=30073 this news article explains  that Criticism of Kemalism is a notable topic, even for ECHR. There are other news articles from reliable publishers in this article. Basically, the article has |reliable sources, |not an original research (it's a notable term that is also coined by a European institution), but it's not |neutral. Again, non-neutrality does not warrant a deletion
— User:Dekisugi, 13:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DEL||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)