Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reid Hazelton
the entire article is basically |unverified editorial sourced to race results. That's not how Wikipedia works. If we actually included those facts that can be verified by those sources the resulting article would violate . There are whole sections (''"Kautz's Honda power and superior aerodynamics seem to have been the deciding factor up the hill en route to the checkered flag"'') which are pure |original research. There are a couple of instances of coverage (like http://www.scca.com/events/news.cfm?eid=5680&cid=51586 this and http://eformulacarnews.com/news_info.php?n=12108 this) but they aren't exactly what we would consider |reliable sources - news reports from various races. I can't see how the subject passes 
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 07:52, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)