Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Pantone
Notability has been established, IMHO, but not the presence of anything that can be said about him ''without'' violating , either of him, or of the judge.  (The statements made about the judge's ruling are legally inconsistent and unsourced, so clearly imply the judge is either an idiot or biased against Mr. Pantone
— User:Arthur, 22:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)