Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street
and '''merge''' verifiable information to appropriate articles. Northamerica's argument revolves around two things: that this information is not present elsewhere, and that there is sourcing that confers notability on the topic. I might agree with the first point, although that's not an argument for inclusion of this ''article.'' The information ''ought'' to be included in Wikipedia. It is verifiable, and it is also interesting! It should be included in relevant articles. Regarding the second point, none of those sources are actually about the ''topic'' of this article. They are about individual elements of the topic. There's a big difference between an article covering ''one'' such rumor/urban legend regarding Sesame Street and an article covering the ''topic of rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street,'' and  looks for the latter. Coverage of the ''topic'', directly. I really just don't see the purpose of having this as its own article, and I don't see the justification for it unless sourcing can be found that can establish the phenomenon of rumors about Sesame Street as being independently notable, as a topic, not as a list of examples of said rumors
— User:Ginsengbomb, 08:19, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)