Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Female-led relationship
and '''Redirect''' - At minimum this is a  situation. The article makes very large claims about feminism, social trends, relationships, etc. but lacks even one reliable source. Of its four sections, the first, The History of Female-Led Relationships, is entirely OR (citing only Wiktionary); the second, Female Superiority, draws predominantly from, ahem, femalesuperiority.com (NSFW, for those who care); the third section, The Nature of the FLR, only cites a wiki page at aboutflr.com (note the URL again); the last section, The Dynamics of the FLR (continuing an oddly scientific organizational scheme), cites an archived version of a discussion forum at she-makes-the-rules.com and rwddh.com. ...It's also unclear that what encyclopedic potential this has isn't already addressed elsewhere (I'm not sure which is the best redirect target), e.g. matriarchy, gynocentrism, gender role, matrifocal family, Stay-at-home dad, Family economics, Men's liberation movement, and so on. --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 03:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)