Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoyChat
I agree that is pretty obvious that pedos have combined forces to prove this article (they say so on the talk page) and topic meets  and  but I don't appreciate the accusation that anyone arguing for this article or adding references to this article must be a pedo. The fact is they have already been given "legitimacy" by the news media and various govt research groups. I'm just annoyed that you're suggesting this rather than putting your foot down and pointing out that a majority of  edits on behalf of pedos are not  and only represent a minority opinion. If you want to be a good admin you should go through and apply  to the article and the edits which people suggest they revert for . The first thing to be done is make sure all the pedo language is inline with the wikipedia pedo watch group that
— User:Herostratus, 16:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)