Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Greatest Works of Modern Jewish Literature
and if not, then '''Strong delete''') IZAK's reasons are valid arguments against having a list purporting to be objective. That's not what we have here, though. Instead this is an unambiguous copyright violation of the National Yiddish Book Center's intellectual property. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service clarified that any list that involves some creativity in what is included and excluded, as well as the order of arrangement, is definitely copyrightable. Our |policy specifically says that "Excessively long copyrighted excerpts" may not be used. Articles consisting only of copyrighted text may be speedied
— user:Nadav1, 22:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NONFREE (Wikipedia:Non-free content)