Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ward Churchill misconduct issues
When looking at this article, Ward Churchill, and Ward Churchill 9/11 essay controversy, I feel we have too much material on this individual.  The Ward Churchill article, left without this, would violate  by being overly biased in presenting him as a legitimate researcher.  Having this material in a sub-article but making that sub-article's summary more prominent (than it currently is) in the main article would appear a reasonable overall balance.  Sourcing meets  standards in the version immediately prior to deletion, with the likely exception of the source in footnote 54, which can be solved by editing
— User:GRBerry, 14:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)