Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snotling
In my opinion this term doesn't meet the |GNG (at least as far as I can find).  However, I do think this is an example of a place where the GNG is wrong.  The non-independent sources allow for sourcing to meet WP:V, and in my search for this term I read through a ''lot'' of sources using the term.  Most in the context of the game (mainly painting the minis) but some outside.  Further, I found some pretty good reviews/overviews of Snotlings, but mainly in blog/forum type locations (self-published and thus not a RS.)  The problem is that the term is clearly notable and worth having here.  It is heavily used (25,000-75,000 ghits depending on how you do the search), shows up in RS reviews (as a passing reference) and simply belongs here.  So an IAR !vote to keep
— User:Hobit, 06:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)