Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regressive left
For me, this is in principle .  is established from my POV. I don't see any  in the article. The only valid argument is , However, insisting on  inevitably makes WP silent on a real concept, until such time a reliable third party has published something about the concept (without using it or being partisan). I think that keeping the article '''tagging''' the lack of sources (or the fact this is a "nascent concept", or something) is better for the average Wikipedia user than deleting it
— User:Thomascorner, 12:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WORDISSUBJECT||WP:N||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)