Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISO 13407
I didn't ignore  when I nominated it, I just worded the nomination poorly. ISO standards start with a presumption of notability based just on the organisation's charter.  And for that reason they get coverage in multiple places if you define "significant" in terms of numbers of hits without regard to what those multiple hits actually say about the standard. I've been part of groups that have worked on standards in the past, and from that experience I'd suggest that a hypothetical otability (standards) interpret "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to be worthy of notice" to mean that the standard had an impact beyond its mere publication.  I took a look at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.101.6086&rep=rep1&type=pdf and found it hard to come up with anything impactful about ISO 13407.  Here are some statements from that paper that suggest ISO 13407's notable contributions to making software usable
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NTEMP||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)