Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piotr Blass
There's a lot of name-dropping that still needs to be removed and unsourced material needs to be expunged also, per Wikipedia policy (erifiability).  What will be left after all that is a bio with some basic background on family, education, etc., references to Zariski surface, and possibly the Zeosync stuff and political campaigning stuff.  With all this other non-mathematical stuff, it seems there is enough notability (notoriety?) to establish a keep vote.  However, I really have no wish to keep a bio that is mainly kept because of minor scandals of dubious notability or verifiability.  Additionally, Blass' mathematical notability was marginal anyway; it's no real loss or gain to have this mathematician's bio or not.  As others have commented, it may just be too much trouble.  After all, don't we have better things to do than patrol this page with the goal of what, not improving the article (since there's not really much potential in it), but instead with the goal of keeping it trimmed down to a stub or semi-stub?  That's really the problem with these marginal mathematician bios.  Most of the time, people say "keep" because they don't see the harm in it, and there is some marginal notability.  In this case, we have the subject insisting on spending his free time changing the article to his blog/webpage.  It's really too much trouble to bother with, I would think
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)