Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emis Killa
but because of notability, not because of lack of . The sources provided by Cavarrone do show notability, but the onus to provide evidence of notability rests on those wishing to add or keep content. (See Wikipedia:Verifiability.)  says that one should "take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources", but I have frequently taken significant efforts to find such evidence and yet missed evidence which someone else found very quickly, because they happened to look at different links than I did. We should assume that the nominator took reasonable steps in good faith unless there is evidence to the contrary
— User:JamesBWatson, 09:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)