Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VideoPad
Could simply be  for this one.  Lacks the multiple reliable independent sources necessary to establish notability.  The CNet "5-stars" is helpful but simply too weak as the only source.  I also checked newspapers.com and highbeam.com (fabulous for AfDs -- if you don't have a free account yet, ask at ewspapers.com and ighBeam) and was surprised to find there is a likely notable Videopad (http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-8238988.html Boston Globe, Aug 1, 1993) but it's not this one
— User:Msnicki, 17:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:N||WP:H (Wikipedia:Too soon)