Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fatal dog attacks in the United States
some things I think it's worth clarifying. 1) Yes it is a violation of . Several keep !voters have harped on the fact that it isn't in-discriminant because has clear inclusion standards. That's wrong. {{tq|reported by the news media, published in scholarly papers, or mentioned through other sources.}} is not a standard of inclusion, it is just a rephrasing of . Of course a fatal dog attack would have to be mentioned in a source to be here. There is no threshold of inclusion other than it being verifiable, which is already our policy (see  as well). Note that indiscriminate says {{tq|merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia}}, which is the case here and brings me to point 2)  absolutely applies to this list. Particularly points 2 and 3, {{Tq|Wikipedia considers the enduring wikipedia:Notability|notability of persons and events. Wikipedia considers the enduring wikipedia:Notability|notability of persons and events.}}. 3) in the same vein,  is not met because nowhere is the actual ''list'' of fatal attacks (chronicling individual events) discussed. These three points are at the heart of why this list should be deleted. Nobody is saying that "fatal dog attacks" or even "fatal dog attacks in the United States" is a non-notable topic, but that the "list of fatal dog attacks in the United States" should be deleted, something that has not adequately been addressed in keep !votes, imo
— User:Eddie891, 12:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IINFO||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)