Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Internet phenomena 3
I fail to see anything new being added to the this discussion that hasn't been discussed in the old AfDs. For example it has ask before '''Who or what decides when something on the internet has earned the 'phenomena' status?''' and been answered that The "accepted definition" of '''phenomena''' is in Wikipedia's own notability policy: once a phenomenon is covered by a secondary news source, it becomes verifiable and thus notable. This is the very reason why almost each entry has a reference attached to it. I would be very tempted to say this AfD could be a  but meh who am I to decide that
— User:Sin, 06:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SNOWBALL (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)