Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natami (2nd nomination)
appears to be no sources (either in the article or discernible from Google News or Books) from outside the Amiga enthusiast community, so no indication of notability. Even ignoring this point, the article is poorly sourced and dominated by a ly detailed 'Specifications' section. (I would also question why this article was renominated without first going through 
— User:Hrafn, 14:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:DRV (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)