Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schlock Mercenary
on  if nothing else (and I am NOT saying that's the only reason to keep it). I find it interesting that as an online encyclopedia we still basically demand that an article's subject get featured in the (paper) New York Times or similar before some will accept it as a "safe to retain" item. If Schlock Mercenary can be deleted as non-notable on the "letter of the law", then deletionists have won, and we might as well close Wikipedia down and hand it other arbiters than the public and the users (i.e. give it to media corporations like everything else). Special:Contributions/125.236.217.145|125.236.217.145
— [[User talk:125.236.217.145|talk]]), 02:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COMMONSENSE (Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means)