Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titania McGrath
and fight lazy and uninformed deletionism everywhere it spreads. The people posting delete clearly did not bother to do so much as a Google search before they asserted that there were no RS sources for her. And the one that did proceeded to whittle away at the sources they found with irrelevant objections that are not germane to a deletion decision. Even worse, one even point blank stated their |bias against her. (And the fact that the book hasn't been released yet is a shibboleth for notability? So what that implies is that ''after'' the book is released, a magic event will occur that will suddenly make her notable. What?) Come on, seriously Wikipedia. Come on
— User:KeithTyler, 03:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)