Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement
The quote from #Point of view forks doesn't mean that a "criticism of X" page shouldn't be created; otherwise, it would be impossible to create an article on an individual/organization's questionable behaviors which have raised public objections, regardless of the subject's notability. As far as I understand, the quote from #Point of view shows that '''both points of view''' (criticism + '''''not praise''''', but '''''responses to criticisms'''''), must be presented on the same page. This issue can be resolved by discussions on the talk page and additions of content, not by an AFD. Moreover, despite , I'm forced to note that there are many pages which start by "Criticism of...", and so I don't think we can assess one article's validity without taking those into account. Lastly, the word "Controversies" instead of "criticism" in the title appears to me more appropriate
— User:Europe22, 17:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV||WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)