Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies of Chabad-Lubavitch
The multiplicity of articles seems in part to be due to an edit war. I'm not impressed by the references of any of these articles. Can anyone who wants to defend their own article be sure to (1) be sure that all the links actually work, (2) that any real published books have ISBNs?  I'd allow all these articles to exist until there is one master article that is extremely well-sourced and is acceptable to the general Wikipedia community as being a good article. What's here now does not seem to meet the normal WP standards. For example, there are many claims made without in-line citations. We are supposed to take it on faith that the person writing the article is correct. The only article by David Berger that I could find was a web posting, that probably does not count as a reliable source by . If this stuff is important, someone should be able to write an article that is well-sourced by general Wikipedia standards
— User:EdJohnston, 22:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)