Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSV application support
WP:FAILN and is an |indiscriminate grouping of material. Totally unsourced article (showing since 2006), hanging around apparently mocking a multitude of WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines. Indiscriminately links, that looks impressive, but does not offer any "support" for |notability. A search did not find anything to show anything either. Maybe it should not have been moved. Of course, if it had the same lack of sources while in the other article just maybe it shouldn't have been there either. In 2015 and 2017 issues were raised and a merge request placed. Nothing was dealt with. "Seeing" or "not seeing" a supposed point is not the issue. We have policies and guidelines, as well as broad community consensus, that notability- be established by reliable sources. Just because someone |"likes" an article does not mean we should have it either. I can't even see a basis for a stand alone article if it were blown to bits and started again from scratch. What would be the sources? Produce a couple so I can look
— User:Otr500, 16:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:LIKE||WP:notability (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)