Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nudity in Judaism
or '''Redirect''' to '''Tzniut'''. This is a total violataion of  and #SOAPBOX as it's just a modernistic pro-nudist mish-mash that makes no sense as it cites old Biblical verses out of context and links to secular Israeli nudist sites with pro-nudism POVs (with graphic pics to boot...) and assumes that this somehow translates into "Judaism" (a clear violation of  by the way.) The article was obviously written by someone who knows ''nothing'' about Judaism, its views and how it's practiced, but ''does'' wish to promote nudism, which has nowadays been Political correctness|politically corrected (and redirects) to "Naturism". To be clear: '''The Jewish view of nudity is already recorded in the Tzniut article !!!''' One could "prove" anything from the Bible this way and add a dollop to it where it's mentioned on secular Israeli websites and call it or link it to "Jewish" or "Judaism" -- which would be totally dumb and falacious. Besides, classical Judaism as it has been practiced for millenia, and in Halakha|Jewish law, ''forbids'' explicit displays of nudity, again see the Tzniut article in this regard. What will they think of next? Nudity in Islam? Nudity in Shintoism? Nudity in Atheism? Nudity in airplanes? Nudity in the White House? Nudity in Hollywood? (actually that is a good one) Nudity in the home? Nudity in the bathroom? Nudity in academia? Nudity in politics? (Or better yet, The politics of nudity!) The potential for this nonsense is endless
— User:IZAK, 12:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NOT||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:No original research)