Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cheeky Panda
per Nom and {{noping|Alexandermcnabb}}. Fails  and hat Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not. I have not tried the products. I would venture that almost everyone appreciates a good roll of toilet paper and some just take it for granted. To those I would suggest crumpling up a brown paper bag or newspaper, rubbing it together a bunch of times, and see how that works. Another option is just go to a store or station, when nature calls, and finding toilet paper equivalent to mild sand paper. However, this discussion is about the notability of a fairly new company, edited by new(er) editors that may or may not be 's, and at least one that has a |conflict of interest but maybe more. ikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion|Wikipedia policy on advertisement and promotion:  {{tq|Information about companies and products must be written in an Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|objective and unbiased style, free of ords to watch#puffery|puffery}}. |Advocacy is writing from one point of view which will lack |balance. The comments above hint at a likely impossibility of a neutral article
— User:Otr500, 06:50, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:W||WP:SPA||WP:COI||WP:W||WP:W||WP:5P2||WP:balance (Wikipedia:Notability)