Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Reimer (2nd nomination)
Apparently I approved this at AfC but I'm not entirely sure what I was thinking at the time. Only a handful of those sources where he has received significant coverage are RS. The status of The Blaze is not really open for debate here as it's already been determined by consensus not to be a RS. Had I to review this over again I probably would neither have approved it nor rejected it but have left it for someone else to look at. The sources unambiguously establish that this person is a real, living human but mere proof of existence is not sufficient for a WP article. Further, a person can appear on 1,000 episodes of ''CNN Morning Express'' and ''Fox & Friends'' and that doesn't establish notability if they're only there commenting on things, versus being the subject of commentary. And campus newspapers may be fine to source facts, but certainly not to establish notability. That said, the ''Fairfax County Times'' is a good source, but the ''Washington Examiner'' is not because it covers him within the context of a political campaign which is addressed in . It is very much on the edge but I'm leaning - though just barely - to weak delete
— User:Chetsford, 23:29, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:Notability)