Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxana Geambasu
Despite all that, I think the case for notability through #C1 is a little weak. She has one heavily-cited paper on Vanish (her work as a graduate student in a project led by someone else), another paper with 100+ citations, and the rest down in double digits, nothing special in a high-citation field. The reason I ended up siding with keep is that she also has a lot of media coverage for her work, both among the articles now cited as sources from high-profile publications (NYT, NPR, Slate, PopSci etc) and among others that could have also been cited but would have been redundant. They cover at least three aspects of her work (Vanish, XRay, and the Gmail findings) and include media from both the US and Romania. I think it's enough for #C7 and 
— User:David, 05:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)