Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Cranston
as failing . Meeting NSPORT is not an alternative to meeting GNG; it merely means there's a good reason to think that an athlete does meet GNG when sources not in the article (or not easily available online) are taken into consideration. In this case, even the keep voters haven't argued that this presumption is actually right in this specific case.The GNG-NSPORT relationship has been discussed ad nauseam, including quite recently in this Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 135#The criteria of WP:NSPORT here are too inclusive|very long VPP discussion where the consensus on this was affirmed
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)