Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitch Wars
I dont know about Darwinek, but you ignored my explanations. Let me recap them. New generations of bold deletionists driven by best intentions  now and again fail to understand that quite a few articles were written long time ago when rules were not so strict. Some subjects are of historical note, but unlike US presidential elections or pornstars, no one really watches these pages or works on them unless some drastic happens. I have  already written above: if you want so badly some  article fixed, go to the corresponding wikiproject, noticeboard, original authors, whatever. But it seems you have a different desire, just delete it and done with the problem. You also seem to lack basic comprehension skills. You wrote ''I do not buy the excuse that, "I'm busy''. This was '''not''' what I said. I basically said "I am busy, but I have found some time to fix it". You may further pretend to be naive and ask "" why you did not do it earlier?" My answer: there is '''HUGE''' amount of work in wikipedia  to be done "earlier". And I am doing it 25/7, but in ''other'' areas. But when some mop/scissors wielding wikipoliceman jumps in with threats of deletion, then don't be surprized that I will put aside my regular work, because you created unnecessary exaggerated panic. And you last sentence of aggressive deletionism is duly noted. You are not alone, unfortunately. But fortunately there is some fierce |and propactive opposition to your extremism. And no, wikipedia is not failing despite years of bitching and groaning and whinning of some, because some others are working
— user:mikkalai, 19:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ARS (Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron)