Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MBG Expense Management
I've looked at the references, which are enough to make me strike my "speedy A7" !vote above. But what we have is (1) the company has passed an audit (2) report of a press release (3) it's a founding member of a trade association (4) it has organised a survey - statement from the director of marketing.  I don't find that really up to the standard of  which says "''Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.''" and excludes "''Press releases... and other works where the company... talks about itself—whether published by the company... itself, or re-printed by other people
— User:JohnCD, 21:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)