Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THOMAS (neuroscience)
The ''origin'' of the article is not the reason for the deletion call here. Rather, the theory does not seem to be |notable. The variety of sources that do not discuss the theory are of no use to us in this discussion as they do not demonstrate that the theory is notable. Those sources might be useful elsewhere (outside of Wikipedia) to explain or defend the theory. That is ''not'', however, appropriate for a Wikipedia article
— User:SummerPhD, 03:14, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)