Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chewbacca defense (3rd nomination)
Multiple reliable independent sources, following the above. If there is a conflict among commentators as to the meaning of the term, that fact should be noted and cited in the article. It still doesn't qualify it as a neologism unworthy of an article under 
— User:Geuiwogbil, 21:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)