Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen A. Chang
I am not seeing a good policy based rationale from the keep voters. With only one significant role to speak of, he clearly fails . Further, there is no in depth significant coverage in '''independent''' sources. The article substantially relies on interviews in gamer blogs and ezines. However, interviews have historically been discredited as RS at AFD towards SIGCOV because they essentially lack independence. Fails 
— User:4meter4, 16:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACTOR||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)