Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Text 100
per nom.  Subject seems only notable within its own industry.  It's biggest claim to fame is lauching Microsoft in Europe 25 years ago, and its own website is apparently the only source for that.  For a PR firm, you'd expect it to have more mainstream press if it were truly notable in the WP sense.  Also, while I have tried to remove the POV, it still feels like an advert, and there's not much left.  I also have serious |COI concerns.  The creator even mislabled the 2005 Holmes award so that it looked like Agency of the Year rather than the more limited Technology Agency of the Year, and I don't know if the good faith assumption holds here due to the COI.  Finally, the existence of articles on similar firms is just |INN.  I'll have to look at the other articles mentioned for possible prod/AfD
— User:Butseriouslyfolks, 22:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:INN (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)