Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perth Leisure Pool
as now meeting all Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, per improvements and sourcing added since the nomination to meet the nom's concern of "unreferenced" (per |WP:AFTER AND ) and per precedents set for inclusion of regional notable venues if properly sourced, as notability for a few million is just as suitable as notability for a few hundred million if it meets the guidelines for inclusion. The article '''now''' leaps past the , despite  views (sorry, but it does) with in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. Wikipedia does not state that such are not worthy of inclusion. Wikipedia does state the requirements that need be met... and this one now qualifies
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 01:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:POTENTIAL||WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)