Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooster School
I do not feel it's old is a reasonable arguemnt for keeping the article - there are trees in my back garden that are far older which don't have articles (and probably shouldn't). |common outcomes is not a policy or guideline - it is just a summary of past decidions it does not superceed policies or guideline (see at the top: ''"For rules, guidelines, and consensus on a more detailed basis, visit the various notability policy pages instead"''). I do not think the fact that notable alumni may have attended makes the school notable, notability is |not inherited and a subject should be notable in its own right. Unless the alumni have caused there to be "significant coverage by reliable, independent secondary sources" of the school then it should not have its own article per . Currently the article is not written from a |neutral point of view (although this could be changed) and unless there are independent sources that show that the article is notable (per ) that will make the information contained in the article |verifiable I do not feel it belongs on Wikipedia. Of course if such sources are found I will withdraw my nomination if there is no dissenting arguemnt within the debate
— User:Guest9999, 22:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OUTCOMES||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NN||WP:NPOV||WP:NN||WP:V (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)