Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraken (Marvel Comics) (2nd nomination)
The issue here appears to be whether TTN A) Conducted a efore search to look for sources and then nominated the page for deletion after determining there likely were none, or B) just looked at the sources already on the page and nominated it for deletion after determining they were not enough. If it's A, that is fine, but if it's B, that's a problem. My understanding of policy is that the burden is on the nominator to conduct at least a basic search for sources for notability or alternatives to deletion, rather than place the burden on other editors to do that work after the fact
— User:Rhino131, 03:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:B (Wikipedia:Bots)