Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional military organizations (3rd nomination)
Original research abounds; each entry should have been sourced as being a fictional military organization to have been let into the list. Now that this is at AfD I concur with deletion since it's quite obvious that the overly broad scope of the list () inhibits the development of an article that fits within our policies. The sum total of the list doesn't amount to any sort of encyclopedic understanding of fictional military organizations other than "there's a lot of 'em!".  The individual entries have nothing in common other than the overly broad criteria for inclusion. As the nom pointed out,  and  come into play here
— User:Themfromspace, 09:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SALAT||WP:DIRECTORY||WP:IINFO (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)