Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Seth Rich
The fact that the death is notable for stupid reasons (viz. conspiracy theories) does not somehow negate its notability. It has received extensive media coverage, and I don't see how BLP1E/BDP comes into play here, since the article's about his death, not about him, and there's nothing in the article which reflects negatively on Rich or his family and friends. Now, obviously this article should not be kept so that it can be used as an incubator for  conspiracy theories coming from |SPAs and POV-pushers. But I see no problem with it being kept as an article that |neutrally describes the detail of the investigation, as well as the conspiracy theories regarding it. (If POV-pushing remains an issue, |ARBAP2 discretionary sanctions can certainly be imposed.) If it comes to pass that the conspiracy theories become far more notable than the murder itself, then I can see the case for moving to Conspiracy theories about the murder of Seth Rich or such, per USer:The Four Deuces|TFD's quite insightful comments here.''' —&nbsp
— User:PinkAmpersand, 19:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:SPA||WP:N||WP:ARBAP2 (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)