Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpenceGabor.
I'm very much behind Duffbeerforme on all of his points. But I'll add one more thing: Bech86 is definitely a . He may not be using his account for just this one article, but the other articles he's created - and virtually  touches on the idea that his contributions touches . Study the history log for this article - leaving out the vandals, Bech86 is really the only editor. If this subject was in fact notable, you would naturally have at least four or five other editors making constructive contributions. But you don't have that here, hence . If this editor has a personal attachment to the subject at-hand, I have problems with that. We're supposed to be creating articles as a way to learn about subjects - and not to write about subjects we might find ourselves as experts, and end up becoming primary sources
— User:Groink, 09:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPA||WP:OWN||WP:POV||WP:OWN (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)