Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhail Katz
Per cademic, the best case to be made for him is 1, but as a professional mathematician it is my personal opinion he has done solid work but not ''significant''.  I would go on to point out that writing a book is neither uncommon for mathematicians, the fact that having a book is not considered significant is even listed in the notes to criteria 1, and they use a mathematics book that gets reviewed on something like mathscinet as an example.  He is a good mathematician, but just not especially notable
— User:Thenub314, 18:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:A (Wikipedia:Attribution)