Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roedy Green (2nd nomination)
Sources offered, especially http://books.google.com/books?id=mdo-95q2EYgC&pg=PA159 1 and http://books.google.com/books?id=Zv8N3PDlcEkC&pg=PA269 2, meet the requirement for multiple reliable independent secondary sources as required by  as usually interpreted.  Yes, yes, I get it, that these are not fabulous sources but I've lost count of the number of times I've !voted to delete on less but yet the consensus has been to keep.  The claim that these sources don't meet our usual standards is believable only if you've never participated in many AfDs
— User:Msnicki, 18:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)