Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korom
mdash; The core issue is |the policy of verifiability. The main policy-backed argument is that there's no evidence that the village exists.  Other things nearby having the name "Korom" doesn't mean that a village officially exists or otherwise meets . Although not an actual guideline, this concept is covered in |common deletion outcomes for places.  As far as whether it's truly a "hoax," I don't know&mdash;that's literally the problem here. The policy-based presumption is that it shouldn't have an article unless we can prove it exists. It's not a valid reason to "keep" something because there's not evidence that it's fake; it's the other way around:  there has to be direct evidence it's not fake to be kept.  No prejudice against speedy undeletion the moment that's demonstrated
— User:Slakr, 08:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:GEOLAND||WP:NPLACE (Wikipedia:Verifiability)