Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people (5th nomination)
This is, in my view, a bad faith nomination. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_ex-gay_people|One poorly sourced list is deleted three weeks ago, and nominator is probably angry and feels that there is a great unjustice in the world. But, this list is well sourced, and satisfy . In adition,  is weak argument and doesn't apply to this list. If there is a problem with sourcing of individual entries it can be fixed or removed (like AV3000 has already said). But I don't see that sourcing is big problem (and even people who voted for deletion don't mention that sourcing is problem). Maybe nominator and some who voted for deletion should read Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
— User:Wikiwind, 09:13, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LIST||WP:DIRECTORY (Wikipedia:Lists)