Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear stonewalling
The article, as it exists now, is clearly a very recent neologism that has not achieved widespread acceptance, thus falling under wiki's guidelines of .  Looking through the gnews archives, there are references to this phrase in news articles going back as far as the 80's, where the term is being used to describe various, and completely different, concepts.  So while I can see that an article with this title could ''potentially'' be valid some day (though I have my doubts), the article as it stands now is merely on a unnotable neologism and thus should be deleted
— User:Rorshacma, 18:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)