Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gil Cisneros
without prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the seat. The substantive notability claim here, and the reason why this article was created, is the election candidacy — but candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, and if you take his candidacy out of the equation the lottery/philanthropy content is ''not'' substantive enough (or sourced well enough) that he would have qualified for an article on that basis independently of his status as a candidate. The only sources here that exist outside of the campaign-specific context are a single article in his ''local'' newspaper and two citations to the same "public relations platform for philanthropists" |blog, which is ''not'' enough coverage to get a philanthropist over GNG as a philanthropist — so I can't give this a keep on "preexisting notability for other reasons" grounds. I can evaluate this only on the grounds of whether he clears  or not — but as a candidate whose campaign coverage is ''not'' showing any signs of being unusually deep or broad compared to most other candidates, he doesn't pass NPOL. Certainly it can be recreated in November if he wins, but nothing here now is enough to convince me that he's already permanently notable today
— User:Bearcat, 16:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLOG||WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:Verifiability)