Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fredrick Brennan
as a somewhat unusual BLP. I will also say that ''the substantial focus on disability is extremely professional'' and it reads like something of a fluff piece. Would also support a '''merge''' to 8chan if the weight of sourcing places matters exclusively on it. Taken alone, most of the matters mentioned in the article and the sources related to only human interest and "mentions" other than straight content pieces is a decent case for . All these smaller pieces combined and I think overall you end up with suitable notability. There's no specific one thing I can point to as being some kind of turning point nor exact guidelines I can quote, and some of the sourced articles aren't the best quality; I'd probably !vote a delete if it were restricted to 1-2, but this many? Yeah. Marginally notable +  x even a bit more than 1  =  enough for me
— User:Tstormcandy, 15:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)