Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janine Machin
I have to agree with the nominator here (my searches bring up BBC website bits mostly with occasional mere mentions), all the sourcing here is purely in passing (#1 is a  interview of 20 short questions, #2 is a name drop: "Janine Machin welled up following the story of Jane Windle" and same for #3: "Janine Machin, pictured, will front the programme covering the west of the region"), and does not rise to the level of . The makes her fail , which requires "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" It also has to be said that Bmcln1's pageviews argument does not stand per  and should be discounted ("just because an article is popular does not mean it is within the project scope
— User:Jovanmilic97, 09:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BIO||WP:POPULARPAGE (Wikipedia:No original research)