Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suman Sahai
Obviously notable. Multiple awards. In addition, there is the fact that the subject has plagiarized in her habilitation thesis. This is sourced to a |reliable source (''Labjournal'' is a well-respected German magazine covering the life sciences) and confirmed by a statement from the University of Heidelberg itself. Although not yet mentioned in the article, the subject has also frequently been interviewed on German radio and television, in newspapers in India and Germany, and Indian TV stations. There have been repeated attempts recently to remove the information about the plagiarism from the article, but as far as I can see, the information presented is not a BLP violation (in fact, the article in ''Laborjournal'' is much more negatively-worded than our article). As ''Laborjournal'' writes, the subject is unremarkable as a scientist and would never pass . However, this is a clear pass of  and unfortunately for Dr. Sahai, we cannot only present positive information, nor should we delete biographies of obviously notable persons just because they don't like what we write about them
— User:Randykitty, 16:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)