Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missy Jay
the article is well-written and I can tell that a lot of work went into it's preparation, however the only listed sources establishing her |notability are ; in other words the only ones listed are promotional in nature. In addition, many of these "separate sources" are from different events listed on the ''same website''.  The author needs to understand that promotional ''(travel, leisure, etc...)'' websites have a vested interest in publishing material on artist that can attract attention to either themselves or a particular locale.  For this reason, this is not a proper means of establishing notability, since this would by proxy open up Wikipedia itself to being used in this manner ''(see )''.  If there were independent publications from established third party sources, and you can't go wrong with |news organizations, then I'd support this article.  As it stands, there aren't even any acceptable Italian sources listed here.  I suggest trying look for acceptable references, otherwise this article is likely going to be deleted.  I wish you luck
— User:Unak78, 18:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NRV||WP:QUESTIONABLE||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:NEWSORG (Wikipedia:Notability)