Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law museum
I hadn't realised that the photo were from a single collection - the Facebook site is a bit vague on that point (and in fact, "This space is all about sharing cool stuff you've collected that relate to the practice of law. Feel free to post pictures with helpful comments and tales about things you'd like to have." implies otherwise). Regardless, however, unless the collection/museum/site has been the subject of significant coverage in independent |reliable sources, it falls short of Wikipedia's |notability and |verifiability criteria. If there's no coverage of it beyond the Facebook site, then I'm afraid it's a case of good luck, and come back when it's better known
— User:Iain99, 00:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)