Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-Vector
It appears from the added references that this topic may be notable in astronomy, and more specifically in celestial mechanics. But the article is presented (and categorized) as belonging to data base algorithmic, and its content is absolutely not notable in this field. For being acceptable, there are two possible ways for improving the article, both needing a major rewrite.  The first method is to keep it as an article of data bases and algorithmic. This would need a comparison (complexity and practical efficiency) with the best algorithms of the literature. IMO these comparisons would be , and the resulting article would not satisfy the criteria of notability in algorithmic
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)