Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Bartholomew
StAnselm, it is not open and shut. In terms of  read that in the General notes section of , it's mentioned as a guideline and not a policy; the exception it gives is the other way around, but certainly the reverse can also be true. Happening to meet one criterion does help, but ''ultimately it depends on the number of reliable sources on the subject''. He doesn't fulfill this, doesn't pass the professor test. Also, in terms of sources, you should know the answer to your question, seeing how you've started/edited the bulk of the "reputable publishers" he has been featured in. It suggests , either that you work at RC or are affiliated with it or him. Either way, the bottom line is that yes, to answer your question, he has written a lot. But no, that in itself does not make him notable. Certainly not enough to fulfill  Listing ''every'' publication he has to his name doesn't make a difference. Some of the sources are from presses that in themselves are questioned to be notable. Others are obscure enough not to have any secondary coverage. Moreover, for someone who has so much out there, you'd think we'd be able to find many reliable, independent sources, and there aren't any to be found. Lastly, yes, he does have a title and that is great but as other editors have pointed out per language in "''Major'' institutions, for these purposes, are those that have a reputation for excellence or selectivity. Named chairs at other institutions are not necessarily sufficient to establish notability." RC is ''not'' a major institution
— User:Jimsteele9999, 15:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:COI||WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)