Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unseen Bean
The central issue here ought to be whether the subject meets the standard for ''significant'' news coverage to establish notability per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria.  Let's look at those cited by the article and a few by AfD commenters here.  The Armstrong tweets are a distraction and don't deserve serious treatment; let's ignore them.  The Reuters blog coverage was a human interest piece tangential to their reportage on the DNC.  (Had this seen broader exposure beyond a reporter's blog, it might meet the benchmark.)  The Ashmore piece appears in a Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired newsletter; its target is a narrow, special-interest audience.  And, not to belabor this, but the Yelp pieces are predominantly reviews accompanied by a brief human interest piece.  Neither significance nor depth of news coverage are established; the article fails 
— User:James, 17:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COMPANY (Wikipedia:Notability)