Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeleChoice
As per  and . If you look back through the edit history you can find a much more substantial article. Just one quick web search reveals enough sources to satisfy |corporate notability standards, for example; https://www.crn.com.au/news/telechoice-sues-optus-claiming-millions-of-dollars-in-lost-revenue-480674, https://www.news.com.au/finance/telechoice-customer-wins-court-case-over-191000-mobile-bill/news-story/af07a76cfe9aa869f6eb14e12478c965, https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/587565/telechoice-pay-credit-monitoring-after-privacy-breach/, https://www.oaic.gov.au/media-and-speeches/media-releases/telechoice-resolution-provides-remedy-to-affected-individuals-and-offers-better-security-for-all-customers, https://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/2009-02-25/telechoice-on-ball-with-carlton, https://www.canstarblue.com.au/phone/brands/telechoice-mobile-phone-plans/, http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2012/10/31/technology/optus-pull-plug-telechoice, http://www.itnews.com.au/News/37273,optus-c2one-stores-sold-to-strathfield-group.aspx, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/30/telechoice_not_optus_chosen_one
— User:Unoc, 21:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Editing policy)