Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul William Day (2nd nomination)
with respects to the nominator, I do not believe that waiting just 12 days since the last close to renominate is an appropriate length of time to allow |improvements over time.  Did you take this to DRV first to contest the non-consensus keep close of 12 days ago?  Sources not being online is not a valid reason to delete, and the sources do appear to be more than just "local" coverage, being sources from all over that contenent. Further, even if available sources are all Australian, notable in Australia is notable enough for en.Wikipedia per 
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:UNKNOWNHERE (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)