Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/François Sagat's Incubus
In looking beyond |current states, I still contend that article issues are more often addressable than not, but as pertinant non-crufty, non-hype, neutral and sourced information that does not contain any of the words or phrases or sources to which the nominator here has taken issue, have now been http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fran%C3%A7ois_Sagat&diff=481978026&oldid=481747526 added through |regular editing to the François Sagat#Director / Producer|Sagat article, I would be okay with a result of '''redirect''' of the current article.  As |preserving the pertinant information has now been done, I would but qualify my refirect with a proviso that there should be no prejudice toward a recreation of the article if/when more sources become available AND as long as the returned article be properly sourced and maintain a properly neutral tone. While the noise ratio in porn article deletions often becomes too high, the nominator and I can agree on some things after all. And in a sidenote, and as a result of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fran%C3%A7ois_Sagat&diff=481978026&oldid=481747526 this edit, discussions of post-AFD merge has been rendered moot
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 21:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:UGLY||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)