Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedHack
I agree with User:Stalwart111. This article has been edited by close to 20 different registered users, including at least one administrator. There is a lack of conformance to |the Wikipedia Manual of Style, but that's not a reason for a deletion discussion. It has a plethora of cites. (I have a hard time getting my head around the idea of a 'Marxst-Lenninist' hacker group, but that's a problem that can be solved by a text elaboration). , that's hard to discern, considering there's been 20 or so registered editors ''and'' not an argument for an AfD. And how can ''any'' article be a '''dubious subject'''? What does that even mean? 'Partisan'? Does that mean ? That's not a reason for an AfD; besides, who can tell with this article - it has not been developed enough. Keep, and sort it all out by , not drive by tagging
— User:Neonorange, 02:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MOS||WP:COI||WP:POV||WP:BRD (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)