Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic views on Falun Gong (2nd nomination)
In general, I support the renaming although there is considerable redundancy. It is about time we stopped FG activists using euphemisms (academic views) and strongly emotional terms (persecution) when it suits. Academics are on the whole neutral or are FG apologists, so having this title imparts an obvious |bias, and avoids addressing the real criticisms of FG
— User:Ohconfucius, 05:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)