Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightsource.com (2nd nomination)
Don't let the number of sources fool you. They aren't independent, |reliable sources, and in the two or three that are independent and reliable, the coverage is trivial. |Notability is not asserted from the sources (and cannot be from these sources), and an organization is not inherently notable because of its association with other notables (cf. an talent agent who works for many well-known people but who has no significant independent press coverage -- that agent does not get a page just because his clients do). This is too much like an ad
— User:Flex, 11:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)