Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kama Chinen (2nd nomination)
for more or less the same reasons I nominated this page for deletion a decade ago. In terms of sourcing, not much has changed; there is still no evidence of the type of coverage that would be sufficient to meet . There's nothing here of encyclopedic value that couldn't be reproduced effectively on one of the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia
— User:Canadian, 21:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)