Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Gould Bear
Reluctant keep'' - I'm seriously unimpressed with the  creation and subsequent |meat-puppetry here (including from someone who claims to have written about the subject and is cited as a source in the article). I'm also unimpressed by the use of the subject's CV as a "source" (seriously, I kid you not) and the |original research that has been used to interpret some of those sources and extract "facts". If I were the subject, I would be very embarassed that someone had attempted this in my name. Nonetheless, there's enough actual coverage of the subject to meet  in my opinion. Someone should take a machete to that "source" list, but the article should probably be kept. A real shame that people thought a genuinely notable subject needed to be spammed into Wikipedia in this manner
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 10:03, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPA||WP:SOCK||WP:OR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)