Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El kondor pada
The listed criteria for the song notability are now http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/El_kondor_pada discussed in detail on the article talk page too, as well as on this page. It is clear that '''http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music/Notability_and_Music_Guidelines/Songs according to the proposed guideline the song is notable''', and that the claims on which this depends are now either fully referenced or can be verified by emailing radio stations like b92, the indexovci themselves etc. Numerous Serbian, and also Croatian, Slovenian wikipedians, and even some from abroad have testified on the main deletion page that this is indeed the case (i.e. confirmed the claims from which notability follows), and so, according to , it should be enough for AfD (means for verifying are available; all claims are verifiable in principle, by checking broadcast etc. with the stations and it is undue burden to require all the e-mail confirmations and non-online references, that these users claim to exist, in short time for the purpose of this AfD; verifiability should be matter of principle, not actual scanning of books and obtaining other proofs about that, but allownig enough information for anyone to check; besides, there are tags to be placed if notability has yet to be demonstrated, deletion is wrong - since, by  a word that it can be done should do for the purposes of AfD - discarding the claims of '''all''' the people who heard about the song or are from relavant area, spreading few countries (that were even warring against each other) that listen to songs in Serbian, is really violating  in my opinion
— User:BabaRera, 16:26, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:AGF||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)