Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pear Cable Audio Cables (2nd nomination)
Still doesn't establish notability as a player in the electronics or wire & cable industry. "High-end" audio "in universe" publications are basically going to mention every tidbit that happens in or is offered in that hobby, same way Model Railroader is going to mention every company that sells scale-model Rail spike|track spikes, because that's what their readers want. So, in context, the mentions can barely be considered non-trivial. The Italian page lists no less than 24 companies that assemble cables for this market, Pear Cable is just one, and is not the ''subject'' of the article. Some of the other companies that Apblake mentions probably ought to go bye-bye too, but equating this company's notability with companies like Audio-Technica is a stretch. Lastly, there is the issue of  as according to the PF article, {{vandal|Apblake}} is one of the principals of the company, although that's mitigated somewhat by the article itself not being excessively self-promoting or spammy
— User:Tubezone, 10:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)