Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Byars Jr.
actually conjecture by an editor ''is'' prohibited even if clearly labeled.  Please see .  If the Rush Limbaugh article contains conjecture about his hearing loss, that should be removed as well.   is very clear in the prohibition of original synthesis of thougth.  Additionally Usenet postings are not  and even if clearly identified as such should not be used as a source or even included in an aricle.  Wikipedia is expressly not the place for republishing rumors, particularly those that come from Usenet threads.  Something else I've noticed that I'm not sure anyone has touched on is the "What ever happened to…?" section, which is completely inappropriate in the context of this article.  This is an article on Byers and off-topic explorations of what happened to individuals who are not Byers don't belong in an article about him. Beyond that, Natalies concerns are valid and are a good reason to see this article reduced to one line at this time per 
— User:Isotope23, 15:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:No original research)