Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional guidebooks
Lists such as these are important for redlink development and serve as a navigational aid for those reading about the topic.  Beyond being useful, they are in actuality ''quite'' encyclopedic.  If you were to look in the index of an encyclopedia containing an entry on fictional guidebooks, if the article itself did not lisat them, then they would have a place there in the index.  Lists such as these are our index and are necessary to serve in that role.  This one in specific does not contain |original research, links to |notable material, and is |verifiable based on those articles
— User:Celarnor, 04:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:No original research)