Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Riskin
since I don't see any actual argument against , which was the point of this AfD. There are enough secondary sources over a period of time to support basic criteria in . The primary sources are irritating, but aren't particularly misused. There have been a lot of editors of the page and the content seems reasonably neutral
— User:Jeff, 17:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)