Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Italian geniuses (2nd nomination)
and request  close of this AfD - the original nomination was closed less than 96 hours ago following a 3 week discussion involving 14 editors in which not only a consensus supporting delete failed but even a simply majority couldn't be achieved. This immediate relisting is absolutely not in the spirit of  and has the effect, whether intended or not, of stifling contributions by the creating editor by harassing him with red tape and bureaucracy. (For the record, I was notified by the article creator of this AfD as a courtesy due to the fact I participated in the AfD that ''closed just 4 days ago'', and not as a canvassing action.) It is clearly not acceptable to continuously relist an article day after day in the hope of eventually getting the right mix of editors that a delete consensus can be achieved. This is doubly disturbing as the article's original author, though extremely eloquent, is most likely not a native English speaker and these continuous relistings may have the effect of chasing him away from the English WP by process of sheer exhaustion. As a non English speaker myself, I am concerned with the use of English as a cudgel
— User:BlueSalix, 13:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOWBALL||WP:RELIST (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)