Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soulscraper
Notable per . The details about Soulscraper in McFarlane are found in the iNsuRge entry http://web.archive.org/web/20040930235056/http://www.whammo.com.au/encyclopedia.asp?articleid=946 link. Whist they are on the trivial side here McFarlane's Encyclopedia is properly researched. A large list of his source material can be found in the Encyclopedia and it is from these sources that McFarlane would have compiled his entry. It is safe to presume that Soulscraper is covered in the reliable sources used. They did  receive coverage in Beat Magazine and/or inpress (McFarlane used both) but I don’t know how well archived those publications are. The Rolling Stone (Australia) article  can be verified by reading issue number 483, dated  May 1993. The Rolling Stone article was quoted in a book which I believe was ''Sound Tracks: Popular Music, Identity, and Place'' By John Connell, Chris Gibson http://books.google.com.au/books?id=XQMHSlRipBEC&pg=PA106&dq=soulscraper&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3SX0U8_-NYW58gX5zIGICg&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=soulscraper%20rolling%20stone&f=false. I can't see the page in question due to google books restrictions, perhaps someone else can. If that's the right book then it also verifies the Rolling Stone article. It doesn't help that they were around in 91-93 from when online coverage is scarce
— User:Duffbeerforme, 05:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)