Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Últimos días de la víctima (novel)
I held my tongue on this because I figured if the book has been adapted to film then that content can't be incorporated into our article on the author, even if the claim that the film is an adaptation of the book is currently unsourced anywhere on English Wikipedia, but the fact that James500 apparently went and looked for a source to verify that claim and came up with a bare GBooks link to an anthology of short fiction that doesn't appear to say anything on the matterhttps://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=ja&id=ThqaAAAAIAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=filmhttps://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=ja&id=ThqaAAAAIAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%C3%9Altimos+d%C3%ADas has tilted me against preserving this article as is. No prejudice against a better standalone article being created if someone can write more sourced content than is already there. And this doesn't even touch on the wikilawyering "essay vs. guideline" remark above, which is complete nonsense (the guideline is a guideline, and not a policy, because it is meant to be flexible and applied based on circumstances; an argument based on the circumstances of this "article" as it stands now is permitted, AFAIAC, to incorporate elements of a widely held editorial opinion like 
— User:Hijiri88, 00:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)