Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li-Meng Yan
Li-Meng Yan's case has received a lot of media coverage, and according to  that should be sufficient reason for inclusion. Admittedly, much of the coverage was in Murdoch media, but many of them are . Her story seems to be that she heard from a professional colleague that the novel pneumonia was transmitted from human to human on 31 December 2019, WHO said there was no evidence of human to human transmission on 9 January, but Yan reported her knowledge of human to human transmission to her superiors on 16 January, but they told her not to talk about it. The Chinese government started the lockdown on 23 January, so human to human transmission must have been common knowledge at that time. I'm not sure what the verifiable facts are and what the truth is, but I'd like to see the claims on both sides laid out on Wikipedia for the benefit of people who are trying to figure it out. It would be a much better story if and when more reliable sources than the Murdoch media and anti-PRC media, preferably written by reporters who understand the discovery of the covid-19 virus
— User:Nbauman, 01:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEIGHT||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)