Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbrage (film)
per my own  showing the film is receiving significant review and comentary in the sources we expect for smaller budget independent films: http://www.dreadcentral.com/reviews/umbrage-first-vampire-uk-dvd Dread Central 1 http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/46033/doug-bradley-tackles-vampires-umbrage Dread Central 2 http://www.mjsimpson.co.uk/reviews/umbrage.html MJSimpson http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/18803 Bloody-Disgusting http://www.joblo.com/video/player.php?video=umbrage_trailer JoBlo http://www.fangoria.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5847:exclusive-clip-pics-doug-bradley-takes-umbrage&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=167 Fangoria http://www.28dayslateranalysis.com/2011/08/exclusive-interview-with-umbrages-drew.html 28dayslateranalysis http://www.makingthefilm.com/diary21.html MakingTheFilm et al. In respect for , I am concerned that this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Umbrage_(film)&action=history brand new article was sent to AFD while being actively edited by its author when it would have been more suitable to have simply tagged it for cleanup, expansion, and sourcing... thus allowing its author to continue his work.  |Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation within an article. As such sources |were easily found, the applicable guideline otability (films) is met. I request the nominator withdraw and allow this to be |improved through regular editing
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 17:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:BITE||WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:N||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)