Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard M. Weiner
unless I'm mistaken, he fails all the  requirements. He certainly fails points 2-3 and 5-9. Points 1 and 4 are a bit less clear, but what is suspicious is that 9 of 14 footnotes cite works by him - failing the "''independent'' reliable sources" requirement, and that a further footnote uses ''an Amazon review'' (!) to validate his notability. We're left with two papers citing him (which isn't that remarkable when you've written nearly 200, and anyway don't actually discuss ''him'' but his work), a blurb for his book, and a couple of sources indicating he's been interviewed (which ''is not'' evidence of notability). What's strikingly lacking is independent reliable sources about Weiner and about the fact that he has made a significant impact in his scholarly discipline
— User:Biruitorul, 15:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)