Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucker Reed
To The Amber House Trilogy, assuming it is not also deleted. The subject has not received wide-enough individual coverage, in my opinion, to merit inclusion under , her individual work does not meet , and she is not a notable activist. The subject's basic claim to notability is that she was allegedly assaulted, and wrote about it on her blog. That's it. This article is also essentially a |soapbox for the author(s) - the idea being (I feel) that an article on Wikipedia will give wider coverage to the allegations made by the subject, which by the way were serious and gross violations of  as seen from any angle. I would have no problem !voting differently on this if there was significant, real coverage that didn't include blogs and her own publishers, but I see this as a worrying BLP concern with no redeeming qualities whatsoever that would otherwise prompt me to recommend this be kept and watched until the end of time to prevent the alleged assault perpetrator from being named. I have no opinion on whether the allegations are true or not, and I don't have a problem with anyone seeking justice any way they can, but Wikipedia is not a battleground, and we don't need this type of thing. Maybe |later
— User:FreeRangeFrog, 21:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:NBOOKS||WP:SOAP||WP:BLP||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)