Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rational Response Squad (3rd nomination)
Not as many citations as I remember it having, but it's still got enough coverage to pass the GNG.  The Blasphemy Challenge was a pretty big deal, and it made headlines, as demonstrated in the article.  Notability is not temporary, and the group does not have to maintain constant coverage.  There are elements of  involved in the Blasphemy Challenge coverage, but there's other coverage, too, even if it's not quite as strong.  For example, their work debunking Uri Geller: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2007-07-07-geller-youtube_N.htm from ''USA Today'', http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Psychic-fighting-YouTube-clips-sued-by-SF-group-2561027.php from the ''San Francisco Chronicle'', and http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/05/eff-to-psychic-there-will-be-a-dmca-abuse-suit-in-the-near-future/ from ''Ars Technica
— User:NinjaRobotPirate, 22:33, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)