Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mozart (train)
but the article is relatively poorly sourced.  I vote "keep" because Wikipedia's deletion guidelines only require that there be compelling evidence that a subject is notable, not that such evidence must be included in the article at present, as Bahnfrend noted above.  It's a named train that ran for more than half a century, with the same name and approximately the same route, serving several major cities in three countries. Tags urging the addition of better sources and more inline citations are definitely called for, but not deletion.  Regarding the sourcing:  Most of the content that is cited (with inline citations) comes from two websites, both of which are questionable sources.  One, www.grahnert.de, identifies itself (in German) as "the Internet pages of Marcus Grahnert".  Under , very rarely are personal websites suitable sources for WP content (thousands of WP articles use such sources, but that doesn't make it acceptable).  Mr. Grahnert ''may'' be well informed, and the content on his site ''may'' be very accurate, but there's no way for Wikipedia readers to know whether it is or not.  The other source, www.trains-en-voyage.com, is also worrisome, because whoever is behind it does not identify themselves.  Unlike Mr. Grahnert's site, this site appears to be for a group, but nowhere on the site can I find any information as to the name of a group, or person, it represents – not even on its "contact" page (which refers to the "webmaster" without giving any name); it has no "about this website" page, not in any language.  Look, I'm a railfan myself, but websites of individuals or of unnamed groups that (apparently) have no paid staff or elected officers are not acceptable sources for WP content, because they have no accountability.  Websites of formal organizations, even railfan ones, at least have some degree of accountability for accuracy of content that they put on the web, so I consider those to be OK. If Mr. Grahnert were a widely recognized authority on the subject area, or had authored several books, e.g., then I would hold a different view of whether his website is a suitable source for Wikipedia, but I find no evidence of that
— User:SJ, 07:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)