Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SF Tech Beat
unless someone can produce evidence of satisfying |Wikipedia's notability guidelines, which so far nobody has done. A Wikipedia editor speculating on what would be the outcome of a survey of people in San Francisco is not a reliable source, and even if we had evidence (not speculation), a lot of people thinking that something "made an impact" is not the basis on which Wikipedia's notability guidelines are based. The actual sources that we have are a whois record, a page not even mentioning SF Tech Beat (so far as I can see) and a traffic record for the site: none of those even begins to be relevant to Wikipedia's notability standards. ''The editor who uses the pseudonym
— User:JamesBWatson, 20:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)