Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable Muslim reports
and delete most of the individual hadith entries.  This is completely unmanageable.  There is no systematic way to choose what should be on this list given.  There is no systematic naming or scholarly precedent that is being followed for this.  I understand the inclusionist impulse. I really do.  However, it cannot be used for this article.  Renaming to "List of notable hadith" is not enough.  How do we set notability in an academic matter?  Are Shia hadith inherently less notable because there are fewer Shia?  How is the naming of the individual hadith done?  At last resort I'd deport the various hadith to wikisource if their translations are in the public domain.  An article like this removes any academic credibility from wikipedia. It exemplifies our bias problems and violates |no original research in so many ways
— User:Grenavitar, 03:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)