Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornik (peak)
and '''comment''': {{user|Natasa1991}}, aka {{user|Zdravkobayter}}, aka {{user|Parkirovski}} aka... I kind of appreciate your efforts to clean up the articles on Serbian landforms, like {{la|Lake Vrutci}} or {{la|Pometenik}} but they are for the most part misguided, and you are so persistent about them that your efforts come out as disruptive. 2,000 meters is not a norm for anything, |notability and other factors come into play. Yes, Tornik is not a very important peak in the geographical sense, but it is the second-largest ski center in Serbia http://www.skijalistasrbije.rs/en/about-ski-resort and thus pretty notable in tourist and economic sense. We do not delete pages just because they are too short or even because the information there is inaccurate. At best, it makes sense to  this short article into Zlatibor. Or it makes sense to leave it at this stage, maybe someone will expand the article with ski center information. And it also makes sense to move it to Tornik, because the current redirect is barely sensible. But none of this is reason for deletion. Please familiarize yourself with our |deletion policy
— User:No, 16:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:MERGE||WP:DP (Wikipedia:Notability)