Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CheapTickets
I believe the company meets  as it has had multiple non-trivial published works written about it.  See the articles linked in the references section.  I also disagree with the assertion that it exists solely as a marketing aid -- the first paragraph states what the company does and summarizes their product offerings, while the rest of the article summarizes the company's history, which I would consider encyclopedic.  Are there gaps in the company's history?  Probably.  That's why its a stub.  Which, by |definition, doesn't have much encyclopedic content.  As far as it existing as a marketing aid, you could probably make that argument for virtually every company article, possibly except for those with a Criticisms section
— User:Hawaiian717, 16:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:STUB (Wikipedia:Notability)