Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Unison
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS|The fact that supposedly similar articles exist is not a valid rationale for keeping an article. Besides, both of the other magazines you cited have been in existence for a very long time, which in itself makes them notable. (I did tag both articles as lacking sufficient references, though, and thanks to you for bringing that to my attention). If ''In Unison'' had been around a bit longer and had more recognition by other |reliable sources, it might clear the bar of |notability, but not yet. You envision this article as "an ongoing chronicle of the magazine," but that role should fall to the magazine itself
— User:Realkyhick, 06:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)