Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTubers (2nd nomination)
I'd even say it could be argued that a  is in order due to the multiple glaring flaws in the nomination.  My initial reaction when coming upon this article was  as well, but what I did was to start an RFC that succeeded in narrowing the scope to include only those persons who already have a Wikipedia article. Any person whose article is later deleted is removed from the list. This is therefore a list of related, notable subjects, which is perfectly in step with what lists are for.  "Steadily changing" and "tendentious entries" are manifestly ''not'' reasons to delete an article. We'd have to scrap millions of articles if those were valid arguments
— User:Beeblebrox, 23:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPEEDYKEEP||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)