Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of support system in Pakistan for Osama bin Laden (2nd nomination)
Why is this article nominated for the ''2nd time''? Article could be improved. But clearly it is not about a Fringe theory and has substantial coverage in mainstream sources and easily verified. it's been discussed in http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704322804576303553679080310.html The Wall Street Journal, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13359030 BBC News, http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/05/04/us.pakistan.relations/index.html?iref=allsearch CNN, and http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/07/world/asia/07policy.html?ref=osamabinladen the New York Times. Barack Obama|President Obama discussed this on ''60 Minutes'' earlierhttp://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504803_162-20060530-10391709.html?tag=contentBody;storyMediaBox. This is ''neither'' a speculative theory nor a baseless conspiracy theory. This article is about well-sourced allegations and that's what it is doing. There have been ''multiple'' accusations by various nations against Pakistan about this exact topic (as demonstrated by the article itself). And this meets  also. "''allegations''" — well-verified, note-worthy and paramount allegations made by some ''very notable political figures'', yes. |Not all POV is unacceptable, Criticism of Facebook or Criticism of the Israeli government or Criticism of religion all reflect a POV but they are existing, as they should be. If there are other problems, they are |surmountable anyway. This AfD is needless and a POV itself. Read what I wrote #mrt|below
— User:Mrt3366, 12:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SUBPOV||WP:PROBLEM (Wikipedia:Notability)