Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemant Taneja (2nd nomination)
The analysis of each presented source show that there currently is insufficient significant coverage about Taneja from independent secondary sources to satisfy /. Also, none of the keep !votes really identify RS evidence that actually go towards this person satisfying a notability guideline.{{pb}}The closest that I could find are the two Forbes articles (https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2021/04/01/general-catalyst-doubles-down-on-healthcare-with-600-million-fund/?sh=5191c5eb2e1b 1, https://www.forbes.com/sites/katiejennings/2021/03/18/concierge-medicine-on-steroids-startup-raised-40-million-to-disrupt-primary-care/?sh=3bf1cea35650 2); they are both similar in that most of the text is Taneja talking about specific companies rather than Forbes talking about Taneja. The second article falls short of being significant coverage, while the first article is right on the borderline. Altogether, there isn't quite enough for GNG but it is a somewhat close case.{{pb}}It is also worth pointing out that there is one review for one of the books that the subject co-authored (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306098/ review for ''Unscaled'') and something that I thought was a review at first but is so short and un-review-like that it appears to be a news release for the other book (https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/jefferson-health-ceo-co-authors-book-calling-for-a-healthcare-revolution.html link for ''UnHealthcare''). The actual review goes towards #3, but we would need to more published independent reviews to satisfy that criterion
— User:MarkH21, 06:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:NAUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)