Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticisms of Harry Reid (3rd nomination)
I'm a huge supporter of the  method of article development, but I have long considered these "Criticisms of " articles are the wrong way to go about it.  Frequently they suffer from undue weight.  On topics where there really are a lot of reliable sources saying things on both sides of the argument (like polarizing politicians), it's ''still'' a balance problem.  Praise of Harry Reid?  That wouldn't make it a week before being deleted as a hagiographical POV fork.  And, thus, so should this, as its opposite
— User:Serpent, 17:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPINOUT (Wikipedia:Article size)