Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaven (Inna song)
to Inna discography (as nominator).  Much of this article is filler.  Most of the Promotion section is sourced to the YouTube video for the song, the Track Listing section gives a table for the download's sole track, and the prose in the Chart section gives a week-by-week account of the songs chart's performance.  But the real issue is whether the song has received the significant coverage from "multiple, non-trivial published sources" called for under .  The article section that discusses the critical response is largely given over to a single review in People Magazine (the Zambian publication, not the U.S. one).  That review contains mostly press-release information on the recording and the video, and devotes only three sentences to a discussion of the song itself.  Indeed, the article here uses more words to describe what the reviewer said than were used in the review itself.  As for the other two sources quoted (Outland and Urban.ro), the brief statements that appear in the article here are essentially the only things that were said by the sources.  So, the question is whether these three brief statements satisfy the requirements for a stand-alone article.  I think they do not
— User:NewYorkActuary, 21:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NSONGS (Wikipedia:Notability)