Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Broeker
albeit weakly. The Iwazumi review is an excellent source, but it's the only reliable, independent treatment of Broeker and/or his work that I could find. If we're going by  #1, a single journal review doesn't suffice. Neither is a single review sufficient for  #3 (needs {{tq|multiple independent periodical articles or reviews}}). If additional sources could be presented that demonstrated significant coverage of Broeker, that would probably convince me, but none outside of passing mentions and interviews turned up in my search, and the other ones listed in the dewiki and enwiki articles are not independent or don't really go towards establishing notability
— User:DanCherek, 16:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NAUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)