Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colorado Dimensional Signs
The problem is not lack of knowledge regarding the subject, but the lack of |reliable sources that provide '''significant coverage''' about it ... articles about the subject in ''The Sydney Morning Herald'' or ''The Daily Telegraph (Australia)'' would be meaningful, but all of the references (currently) are from publications that are not |notable enough to have Wikipedia articles of their own, so it will be hard to convince the other editors that it meets the criteria for inclusion, which in this case is . &mdash; Special:Contributions/71.166.147.78|71.166.147.78
— [[User talk:71.166.147.78|talk]]), 20:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)