Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IP2Location
I'll give you my take on the primary differences. NCORP guidelines are stricter in order to counter "echo chamber" articles and to ensure that "Independent Content" (as per ) is available in order to determine notability. So, for example, when editors say things like "that's an independent source", they usually mean that there is no corporate connection between the topic company and the publisher and that there's no personal connection between the journalist and the topic company. With NCORP, there is also a focus on "Independent Content" which tends to not get a thorough examination when looking at articles through GNG glasses. There is also an emphasis that a topic company must have an article that provides in-depth information on the actual topic company itself () and not an in-depth review of their product with a one-line description of the topic company. So when you're examining references here, ask yourself whether the reference discusses the company at an in-depth and detailed level and whether the journalist provides their own opinion or presents or one from a third party and isn't simply repeating or commenting on an announcement from the topic company
— User:HighKing, 20:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)