Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Deanda
No references for any of the claims is a big problem.  It simply does not assert meeting  or  in any coherent way.  Claims to be considered "legendary" - by whom? Ties to other bands and musicians are confusing and unreferenced, there's some name dropping but it's just "compared to" or "attended a lecture by", and at best "worked with" - in what capacity exactly? Only person contributing content seems to be the subject of the article, which is often cause for serious concern. Ultimately this needs some references to be cited, if they answer my questions, that might change my mind
— User:W, 17:55, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NMG (Wikipedia:Notability)