Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Adams (wrongly jailed)
per . The fact that his sentence was overturned doesn't suddenly make him much more notable than any other convicted murderer/murder suspect - speaking as an English law student, the EWCA (Court of Appeal) looks at dozens of appeals of this sort a year. It also doesn't help that the central source is the Daily Mail, a newspaper which is chock full of "Miscarriages of Justice and Other Reasons Why The Government And Judiciary Are Bad". I find Location's argument around http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-evening-chronicle/2009/04/04/andrew-adams-stole-30-meat-packs-after-murder-conviction-quashed-72703-23312404/ this to be flawed; the fact that a local northern newspaper thinks he's notable means we should? Really? We set higher standards in some ways than ''national'' papers, nevermind local rags. Providing the bailii judgment is similarly useless; almost all cases at that level are noted by one of the Law Reports. The fact that it appears on BAILII doesn't make it notable, it makes it clear that the judgment is a EWCA one
— User:Ironholds, 02:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)