Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matoran
Lacks |''reliable'' sources to |verify that the information isn't |original research (which is predominantly seems to be) or that it adheres to . There seems to be only one http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2002/11/56451 viable source applicable to the subject from those which were pointed out above, which is used already in the main article where coverage is slightly better. The subject fails  by not containing multiple secondary sources, and as such is #REASON|eligible for deletion
— User:Seraphim, 11:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:NOTE||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)