Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. F. Kapoor
Fails  in that he is not ''"influential in the world of ideas without (his) biograph(y) being the subject of secondary sources."''  Kapoor is well published, but he does not appear to be widely cited in other (i.e. secondary) sources.  The three "references" included in the article aren't really references at all.  Two of them are biogrophies, thereby providing a certain amount of evidence ''against'' notability as defined in .  The third is a Google Scholar search, which is not a reference at all.  Unless someone can find secondary sources that are not simply biographies, Kapoor cannot be considered notable
— User:Wikipeterproject, 21:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)