Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Dilhara
The articles for the shows she's supposedly so well known for being in are extremely badly sourced and barely notable themselves. Looking through the articles on them I'd hard pressed to deduce that they are that popular or at least enough to warrant this actress having an article because of being in them. Since their claims to fame are mostly weasel words. For instance she "Has a large fan base." Cool, but that could mean anything and plenty of non-notable actors/actresses have fan bases. She's in  Salsapuna which is a "long running" program, but so what if it's long running? Supposedly she's "popular among the Sri Lankan audience", but again that's meaningless to notability. Everything else is much of the same. So, I'm going with delete due to failing . Unless someone posts some serious, in-depth, reliable sources about her. BTW, I know she has the award, but it's questionable the award is "well-known and significant." Plus, it doesn't have anything to do with her acting careering and I'm pretty sure that's what  is talking about when it references awards. BTW 2.0, I could also do a break down of the sources currently in the article and why I don't think they pass  and are mostly ref bombing, but I'm not going to waste my time. I think her lack of notable roles is way more important anyway. Since the article is about her as an actress. Not her other work. Even though most of the article seems to be about it, but I'm not the one that referenced  originally to try and claim she was notable. So, whatever
— User:Adamant1, 06:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACTOR||WP:NACTOR||WP:NACTOR||WP:NACTOR (Wikipedia:Notability)