Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East River Monster
I would like to add that, in my opinion, the outcome of this debate lies on how one wants to perceive this case. On one hand, one might argue , , and , plus the fact that there is ample sources and the subject being unusual in the sense to say that it is no usual animal. General notability seems to be met. But on the other end, naysayers might resort to arguing with the backup of Wikipedia policies like , , , , 
— User:Bonkers, 09:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:PRESERVE||WP:FRINGE||WP:SENSATION||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Notability)