Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natami
Despite the tidal wave of SPAs (which, of course, are coming here because people are urging them on an Amiga bulletin board in multiple topics to do so http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=58103 http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=58104), this AfD can only be decided on Wikipedia policies and guidelines.  That a handful of remaining Amiga fanboys are excited about this is all very well and good, but in order to sustain a Wikipedia article, this must be covered in "significant detail" in |reliable, independent, third-party sources.  Could the fanboys cite any articles in mainstream media, newspapers, print magazines or coverage on TV or radio news programs?  I wouldn't hold my breath.  There is only '''one''' Google News hit in English http://www.osnews.com/thread?355351, a blog post which gives this project a passing mention alone
— User:Ravenswing, 07:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)