Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boubaker polynomials (3rd nomination)
Looking over the bibliography, WT:Articles for deletion/Boubaker polynomials (3rd nomination)#Reference list, I have managed to do cursory verification of enough sources from enough respectable journals.  I read through a few of the articles and while they don't strike me as nobel prize work, they also do not strike me as fraud or trickery, etc.  I think we can assume that (some of) the articles cited are just fine.  For me, there are enough '''significant coverage''' in '''independently edited and published reliable sources''' to satisfy the |notability guideline
— User:JackSchmidt, 03:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)