Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Edward Said memorial lectures
I am still not entirely sure about this, but I find Plot Spoiler's many arguments unconvincing. I do not see why it violates . As Mike Cline asks, which criteria does this violate? "This memorial lecture is not a recognized phenomenon that merits its own article" is just a "I do not like it argument", as is "The LECTURES, which this article pertains to, are NOT significant". The real question is whether the lectures as a whole have been noticed. I would be very surprised if they had not. That is what those who wrote this list should be looking for. Given all the other references I think this can be kept to give more time to find such a mention or indeed until the lectures as a whole receive more notice. There is no strong reason here to delete useful material
— User:Bduke, 21:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIRECTORY (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)