Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Bologna
The reliable sources indicate that the subject is notable for more than one event, though the 2004 events would not have been adequate sources to support an individual article for Bologna on their own.  I'm at a bit of a loss to understand how a keep is not obvious here - it appears to me that the argument being used is some sort of BLP+1E rather than simply BLP2E.  The contention appears to be that if a subject had not been quite notable enough for an article, being involved in ''one more'' event then should not serve to make that person notable.  If we were to accept this notion, we can extend BLP1E to BLP2E, to BLP3E, and by induction no one could become notable (or at least no article that we |don't like
— User:Noren, 15:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)