Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Aditya
Being well-known in a particular ethnic community is not a Wikipedia inclusion criterion per se — it's not clearly quantifiable how well-known somebody is or isn't in most cases, but rather "well-known" is a vague claim that's open to abuse and hype-inflation. So we judge notability not on the basis of the general claim to being well-known, but on the basis of specific things that the person has done, specific roles that they've held, specific analysis of the specific sources brought to bear, and on and so forth. And on that basis, what's here isn't adequate at all: the article is entirely too dependent on |primary sources and |routine local coverage in a local WordPress blog, with not even close to enough genuine |reliable source coverage shown at all. And nothing claimed in the article is an automatic notability freebie that would ''exempt'' him from having to show more reliable source coverage than this, either
— User:Bearcat, 15:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:ROUTINE||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)