Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rape jihad (5th nomination)
per the numerous issues with regard to /, , , , , and so forth; I advise respondents here to check out the talk page discussions for salient details.  I think there remains some potential for a '''merge of some of the content''' into the articles Wartime sexual violence, Sexual slavery, and Slavery in 21st-century Islamism (to whatever limited extent the material which is properly sourced is not already located in those articles).  I also feel that a general article on the topic of sexual terrorism (a more neutral and less inflammatory/coatrackish title for a topic whose notability and verifiability under available sourcing is undeniable) could be of immense value to the project's coverage of sexual violence.  I would not only support such a move as a reasonable middle-ground approach, I'd volunteer as much time as necessary to helping get it off the ground, as its an important and broad topic upon which we have very little coverage at present.  But I suspect that the acrimony attached to ''this'' article may preclude that route in the short term, as some may see it as an end-run around the delete that is likely to occur -- and the "salt" comments above tend to support this supposition, with everyone clearly tired of wrestling this neologism down. So while I think some sort of neutrally-approached article on the broader topic of rape utilized as a means of social control is not only well-advised but probably inevitable, at the moment my support goes to deleting this present article outright, as a non-neutral, inadequately sourced, and otherwise problematic mess
— User:Snow, 20:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:SYNTH||WP:COATRACK||WP:POVFORK||WP:NEOLOGISM (Wikipedia:Verifiability)