Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddharth Shetty
The nomination is clearly good-faith, but I'd say in error; while about half of the article's sources are non-independent of the subject and primary in nature or otherwise non-suitable for verification or notability assessment, at least six of them are acceptable reliable sources which treat the subject in detail.  (which is the principle I assume nom was referencing via  essay) does not seem to apply here as notability appears to be established via 
— User:Snow, 03:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL||WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)