Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Bowman
Honestly, I would tend to agree with the nominator on this one. If the subject has had one prominent role (as opposed to a body of work over time), that role has to be truly notable to justify an article, and I'm not convinced that that is the case here. I would also throw out the |usual caveats - if Mr. Bowman ends up in a notable role or roles in the future, and if sources are presented to document this, then an article might be appropriate. But we're not there yet
— User:Ultraexactzz, 12:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:USUAL (Wikipedia:Usual caveats)