Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One-Above-All
Aidoflight, you seem particularly alarmed that deleting this article means that it will be deleted forever.  Nothing is permanent and that deletion of an article does not prohibit it from ever being added again. The article hasn't demonstrated notability per WP:N.  Either find those sources that will or don't.  But if you or some other editor doesn't, then you can't ignore it and argue that it should stay.  If an article is going to be on here, it is supposed to fit that criterion.  If it doesn't, it will always run the risk of eventually being proposed for deletion.  Every instance of it remaining despite failing that criterion just means that it slipped through the cracks, and that goes for any article on Wikipedia.  The only thing that might keep an article up is if it's obvious that the subject has independent sources out there and it just hasn't been added yet.  That would be the case if someone created an article on Superman or Senator John McCain.  One Above All is obviously going to be more obscure and is less certain to hav those independent sources.  That's why I keep stating that you should try to find those sources.  If you do that and add them in, then this whole AfD becomes moot.  But if you can't find any, then it means this article fails notability and should be removed.  If at some future point in time, an independent source is found or is created, then the justification for recreating the article exists.  All the other discussion about the synthesis and OR is to point out that even if the article meets notability and stays, it needs a MAJOR overhaul and weeding. Also, please remember to be ivil|civil
— User:Luminum, 06:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:C (Wikipedia:Copyrights)