Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belgian Orienteering Federation (2nd nomination)
I disagree with the blanket nomination - surely notability ( and  in particular) has to be decided on a case-by-case basis, not merely by saying "hey these look stubby and unpopular". On the other hand, I don't see a single valid "Keep" argument above. "Likely to be notable"? Notability needs to be proven, that's what guidelines are for, and there's no point in guessing. "60,000 active participants" - so what?  and  require ''sources'', not hands. "Although it's not an olympic sport, it's still somewhat popular in some European countries" - doesn't matter since the articles are about the ''organizations'', not about the sport. "Quite well referenced" - the best among the arguments but still not enough: do these references count towards meeting  and/or  or not? Finally, as a member of WP Croatia, I'd say probably the best choice would be to rename Croatian Orienteering Federation to Orienteering in Croatia and amend the contents accordingly. For one thing, it makes no sense to create an article on a more ''narrow'' topic in the absence of an article on a more ''general'' topic. This could be the way to go for other nominated articles too, although again this is best decided on a case-by-case basis
— User:GregorB, 21:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:GNG||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)