Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Blaylock
The first three citations say it all - they rebut Blaylock's theses without mentioning him in particular. Writing for NewsMax and JPANDS similarly confer no |notability. His books have received some attention (''e.g.'' http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FDN/is_4_8/ai_111303987/ this review in the Alternative Medicine Review), but I have not found any particular evidence of impact. The media appearances come closer, but they honestly are just a step above |self-published. Given that this is a |biography of a living person, it is especially crucial that we use solely in depth high quality independent sources
— [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] ([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]]), 16:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPS||WP:BLP||WP:notability (Wikipedia:Verifiability)