Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacGyver the Lizard
I believe this article passes the .  MacGyver has been the topic ("significant coverage") of multiple publications by reliable, independent, sources.  I do not believe any argument can be made that this is a case of , as none of the coverage is related to any event.  He has not gained temporary notability as a result of any event, but rather has received this coverage as a result of already being notable.  In my opinion, this alone is enough for a '''keep''' vote.  In addition though, I think an argument could be made that he also passes under  (2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following) as well.  I do not believe a standard of "Trekkies" should be applied, as absolutely nothing other than Star Trek would pass this test.  A  (3. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment) argument is also possible, as he is the only reptile (unique) with any significant fan following as a result of creating videos (very unique) that show reptiles as cute, friendly, animals.  He is well known throughout the reptile community for changing public opinion on reptiles. (Note:  I am the article author.  I believe I am being completely objective, but take my arguments as you will
— User:Lizzymartin, 22:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:ENT||WP:ENT (Wikipedia:Notability)