Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KBC Void
You have an unusual understanding of what "puffery" is. See the essay Wikipedia:Wikipuffery. "Seven times bigger than normal" makes it "unusual", as the word is generally understood. http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/milky-way-galaxy-cosmic-void-04939.html SciNews called it "fascinating." Do you prefer that to "unusual? They also said it is the largest known void in the universe. Wikipedia deals with "Notability" as specified by . Where is the policy or guideline for your notion of "reliability within astrophysics"?   We need not wait until it is proven that a scientific theory is "correct" before we have an article about it. Also, you stated that "An area of space a billion light-years in radius is synonymous with "the entire universe" for all purposes other than astrophysics." But Universe says the diameter of the entire universe is 91 billion light years. Observable universe lists various historic estimates of its diameter both smaller and larger than that, but none are as small as the figure you stated, which has little bearing on the notability of this subject
— User:Edison, 20:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)