Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zadara Storage
yes, the history has been expanded, but there's still a sources problem. Per , ''Startupbeat'' and ''sramanamitra'' aren't independent and ''USPTO'' can't be used for notability.  ''Storagernewsletter'' is literally guessing (it uses "apparently" far too often). ''Socaltech'' is a press release, and that's on top of what K.e.coffman has indicated above.  Aside from the fact that I now have objective proof that the founder wrote the article in the first place, I'm just not seeing anything here that leaves me with the sense that notability is met - it's still just another tech company amongst a slew of tech companies, and I still have no idea why what they actually do is notable either
— User:MSJapan, 17:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)