Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Achúcarro
I don't see grounds for speedy (though it may ) unless nom withdraws. Agree with nominator on the contents of the article and that sourcing of this article, in terms of  and RS issues, leaves a lot to be desired (hint - sometimes less is more - using a few high-quality refs is better than a large number of low-quality ones). However, the subject clearly passes (1) - per https://scholar.google.co.il/scholar?start=0&q=author:%22Ana+Achucarro%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 google scholar (not you need to search without the diacritic ú as many papers only have u - and you get significant less results than ú) - our subject has a h-index of around 26. Her two top cited papers (on which she is the first named author) have 1,087 and 333 citations respectively - this has her comfortably passing NPROF which is one of the very few SNGs that actually overrides GNG (which she possibly does not pass per my very quick check - Eppstein's links above seem to be interviews with the subject herself - which do not establish SIGCOV - however this is all moot given NPROF(1
— User:Icewhiz, 06:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOW||WP:BLPPRIMARY||WP:NACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)