Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sex symbols (4th nomination)
after giving this one some thought, while I think there's no issue with the ''notability'' of this list, there is a problem with  because I don't see a way to set an unambiguous inclusion criteria short of "has been called a sex symbol". Unfortunately that's a term that people, including reliable sources, throw around without a lot of clarity about what they mean other than that, well, they think someone is attractive. And if that's the case, why wouldn't we include synonyms? Include "sexiest man/woman alive" lists and "heartthrobs" and "hunks" and "babes"? What's the difference? The closest thing I can think of to a sensible criteria is to only include people in sources that are about the concept of "sex symbols" (maybe even limited to scholarly literature). That's potentially problem prone in itself, and probably sufficiently limiting that it couldn't get buy in among those who would edit such a page, so I wind up as weak delete. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 17:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SALAT (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)