Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saffron terror
To me this appears to satisfy  via  given the available sources. That's not to say the article as it is should stay as it is, of course -- just that I don't think deletion is the way to solve problems with the article. That said, I feel like I may misunderstand some of the delete arguments. The most convincing non-keep arguments to me would be (a) that once the page is brought up to NPOV/RS standards it will have insufficient content beyond a dictionary definition, or (b) that there is an obvious target for merge and redirect. I see some comments that have touched on each of these, but I hope someone can either summarize one or both of these positions or otherwise point me to where I may be overlooking or misreading. --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 23:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)