Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Messiah claimants
per Users {{user|Alansohn}} & {{user|Cullen328}} and it is really surprising that the nominator makes sweeping assertions about it being "OR" -- when no OR is visible to the naked eye at all -- but does not even cite one case to back himself up. This article/list is unique to Jewish history it relates to historical failures stemming from the notion of a Jewish Messiah, so it makes no sense to merge it with another "general list". It is also the lead article for its parent category :Category:Jewish Messiah claimants where many of the cases cited in the list are discussed at more length with more  & . That it has not been developed much over the years is no reason to delete it either. WP has been around for many years and editors have come and gone. There are relatively few good Judaic editors who stick around for a long time, so that the work that had been started should not be eradicated on the flimsiest of excuses of  & . Thank you
— User:IZAK, 12:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)