Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Chalker
while the content of the article is objectionable, the subject meets the criteria of inclusion as there are multiple references about her as https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/soloish/wp/2015/12/15/6-things-that-would-do-more-for-womens-sex-drive-than-female-viagra/, https://www.bustle.com/p/9-fascinating-facts-about-female-sexual-anatomy-8878384, https://www.mic.com/articles/148568/what-is-menstrual-extraction-inside-the-controversial-technique-that-could-help-women, https://www.centralwesterndaily.com.au/story/6605641/tissues-and-tim-tams-for-parents-as-excited-children-start-first-day-of-school/, so she passes 
— User:Chiro725, 01:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)