Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White privilege (sociology)
nobody has attacked the |notability of this article. even the critics agree that this article should be here so that's not the dispute. it sounds like the pro-deletion camp is saying that the only way to improve this article is to start over. this doesn't fit with what ive seen over the past year. over time the opinion piece was scrapped, the  fight stopped, the article got some proper footnotes, and there were only a few uncited facts left. it's still not perfect. citing everything wouldn't make it perfect. but deleting it ain't gonna fix it. one attack on this article is that the sources aren’t |neutral or |reliable. the most questionable stuff seems to be the oldest. flag that or edit that if you gotta. but stats from universities, newspapers, and government are solid. i agree that some parts only quote stats without conclusions, and so there’s some  and  going on. but it doesn't take much for somebody to find a book that takes those stats and explains them using white privilege. and if the stats lead to a different conclusion, then somebody should put that other conclusion in the criticism. isn't that gonna work better than killing this article? the last criticism is that anyone who says “white privilege exists” has a POV and so the article will always violate . but we can’t slash every concept that a few people say doesn’t exist. a study from the “panel on climate change” isn’t too biased for wikipedia just because they want to show that the climate is changing. if the science is there you can’t deny it. critics can only offer new data or new conclusions. that’s why we got articles on global warming and the bell curve, with criticism for both...  oh, i guess I see just one more criticism... supposedly everybody voting “keep” is part of a vast conspiracy! when the debate gets to that level then you know it’s time to give it up
— User:Dannythrax, 16:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV||WP:SYN||WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:notability||WP:reliable (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)