Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vega Conflict
Actually, this should have been moved to draft to be incubated instead of this, but because , I am leaning this way. There is several significant coverage in reliable sources, such as Gamezebo https://www.gamezebo.com/2013/08/16/vega-conflict-review/, Engadget https://www.engadget.com/2013/09/15/rise-and-shiny-vega-conflict/, Touch Arcade https://toucharcade.com/2015/05/07/vega-conflict-review/ and AdWeek https://web.archive.org/web/20181209065650/https://www.adweek.com/digital/kixeye-launches-vega-conflict-on-facebook-browsers/. Not strongly notable, but enough to pass the requirement per 
— User:Jovanmilic97, 17:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)