Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhaka Paranormal Society (2nd nomination)
Taking a look at the article I only see two references - one from Dhaka Tribune, the other from The Independent. While these may be major news agencies, the publisher of a reference does not give the source inherent depth of coverage, which is one of the things we look for in citations and sources. See  – the Dhaka Tribune's interview falls over the criterion for ''quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources'', while the Independent's club review falls under ''routine restaurant reviews'' (they're both routines reviews). A web search would indicate a lack of verifiable, independent, reliable sources
— User:TheAustinMan, 22:40, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)