Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture (second nomination)
The first AFD result was arrived at correctly.  The page can and should be edited—anything important or non-trivial on it should be edited into the main article and this page should be deleted.  In particular, mention of a ''New Yorker'' story that was reprinted by Newman should go in the main article, not ghettoized in a "... in popular culture" page.  These "in popular articles" are most often a bad idea and non-encyclopedic ''unless'' the the ''effect or significance'' of the subject on popular culture has been studied and has  sources.  Sure, the infinite monkey theorem has appeared in pop culture a lot.  What is needed are  reliable sources that examine what these mentions tell us about pop culture or the theorem.  This requires ''secondary sources'', not ''primary sources''.  The ''Foxtrot'' comic strip is a reference to the fact that the theorem was used in that strip, but that primary source alone doesn't make an article unless a reference can be found that describes the significance of the theorem's appearance in a comic strip
— User:Quale, 05:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)