Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Dinah Elizabeth Pearce
the sourcing is either trivial coverage more about the building than the woman or not independent. I'm also not entirely sure if the Wordpress site meets . I don't see enough in-depth treatment to merit an article under 
— User:TonyBallioni, 18:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)