Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fifth Harmony (3rd Nomination)
OK, I'm intrigued, I guess I'll play. First, it is strange that the nominator chose  to keep the article they recommended. Never seen that, but oh well. Despite, it looks like they receive enough coverage to meet . What they need to show is that they meet . The past AfD discussions (all 3 million of them it looks like) state to redirect as they do not meet ; however, looks like they meet #1 as they have significant coverage even outside of the X Factor. Record deal with Epic Records and in the studio working on an album, not sure if having a song released is an issue here. Maybe I am not reading  correctly, but looks like they fall into #1. Let the comments begin
— User:FoolMeOnce2Times, 16:18, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BAND||WP:BAND||WP:BAND (Wikipedia:Notability)