Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic McDowall-Thomas
Per my argument at rticles for deletion/Cubicle 7, ''Designers & Dragons'' is borderline reliable under  (non-academic publisher, cited only in other borderline sources); since we hold  to a high standard, I'd lean towards not counting it in this context, so we'd need another few solid RS
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:SCHOLARSHIP||WP:BLPSOURCES (Wikipedia:Attribution)