Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oroville Fire Department
The previous AfD rationale for the article's deletion did not provide a valid reason for deletion but reasons to cleanup. I guess that was why {{u|Gaff}} voted its ''keep and cleanup'' in the first instance (not too sure, I might be wrong). However, it doesn't seemed to me that the issue of the subject |notability was addressed in that https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oroville_Fire_Department_(California) discussion. However, {{u|Zackmann08}} Comments; {{tq|Hello. I was hoping you could help me. I saw your comments regarding my nomination of Oroville Fire Department (California) for deletion. There is something I have never understood about the process and I was hoping you could help me understand}}  on {{u|Gaff}} talk page and their vote here as '''Keep''' suggested that {{u|Zackmann08}} don't really understand certain guidelines and policy
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)