Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Examination of Apollo Moon photographs
I don't agree with the nom's rational... but I do agree that this article should be deleted.  The article is a spin off from Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories.  The topic of ''that'' article is definitely notable.  It's fringe... but it is notable fringe (in fact it is used as an example of how a fringe theory can be notable in  itself).  As a sub-topic of ''that'' article, the various examinations of the photos taken on the moon (or not taken on the moon, depending on one's POV) has some degree of notability... but I have to question whether the sub-topic merits an article on its own. Is the idea of examining the moon photos notable? (and if so, can that notability established through reference to reliable secondary sources that are independant of the topic, as per GNG?) I would !vote for merger back into the main article, except that there already is a fairly good section on photos and films ''in'' that main article.    Also, ''this'' article has other problems... for one thing it has serious WP:V and WP:RS issues. The majority of the article is either cited to unreliable sources (various on line forums and personal webpages and the like) or not cited at all ... and it is filled with Original research (as it is structured, it is a classic example of an OR magnet, just begging for POV warriors to add their own pet theory or analysis of the moon photos)... The one thing I will say in favor of the article is that it is even handed in its problems... both the conspiracy theorists and the debunkers are trying to prove the "truth" of their claims and counter claims, but both are violating WP:NOR in doing this.  So the one thing it does ''not'' have is POV problems
— User:Blueboar, 20:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)