Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SORCER
there is a current flurry of activity adding yet more scientific papers to the article. This needs to be viewed with care, since  is required to establish notability. All primary sources such as scientific papers do is to verify existence. With so many papers one wonders why no  stuff exists. The obvious conclusion seems to be that it lacks notability. The extra papers add credence to the coatrack hypothesis for people to hang up scientific papers on
— User:Timtrent, 01:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)