Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Songs Containing the word Fuck in a Prominent Position
When George Carlin or the Family Media Guide creates a list of songs containing "fuck", there may be grounds for writing an article citing them, per Seven dirty words and List of films ordered by uses of the word "fuck". The "commercial and legal ramifications" of "fuck" are unremarkable on their own - the "ramifications" talked about are fairly minor in reality, they are crucially not restricted to use of this one word, and besides, JJay alleges that it's the use of "fuck" "in titles" that has significance - if that's so, why on earth is this article being mealy-mouthed about "prominent positions"? Maybe thirty years ago this would have been an exciting and edgy topic, but today, I personally find it rather tame and crufty - "juvenile" even, FWIW. Aside from my POV, I note no one has yet explained how this article successfully passes the WP policies that I cited above (A7, , ). It would definitely help the article's case if this were done
— User:DaveG12345, 16:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)