Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William A. Dembski
nomination does not cite a legitimate reason for deletion. Wealth of coverage demonstrating topic is notable. Whilst  is generally ''not'' a valid reason for deletion, I would note that this article does in fact comply with  as it ''does not'' "'give equal validity' to minority views such as pseudoscience". Likewise no indication (let alone a coherently argued claim) that it violates  and 
— User:Hrafn, 11:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:VALID||WP:MNA||WP:RNPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)