Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the July 2016 Kabul bombing
effectively the same thing). (1) At time of writing, this page and the main article are very short and splitting off is definitely not justified. See . (2) This is clearly just the latest in a long line of attempts by list-junkies to exhaustively document all the standard predictable condemnations/commiserations, "in case they might be useful in the future", which is not what WP is for. See . The significant statements should be merged back into the main article, the rest deleted. I'm happy to note that an intelligent precedent has recently been set at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2016 Nice attack. (3) The last bit of the nomination rationale is clearly facetious and tasteless and should be ignored, or preferably fixed up by the nominator.  &mdash
— User:Rwxrwxrwx, 18:37, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPLIT||WP:NOTEVERYTHING (Wikipedia:Splitting)