Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remote Telescope Markup Language
It looks like this language has been discussed in detail in many reliable sources, including journal and news articles; not all are telescope manuals or from the creators. There's usable content for expansion about the language's history, structure, and current uses, so I'd say it passes  and merits a keep
— User:ComplexRational, 03:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)