Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Reeves (mathematician)
He does have some high-citation papers (aven normalizing for which field they're in), and ordinarily that would be enough. But to me that's mitigated by a couple of other points: (1) they were apparently all written when he was a student (e.g. although the journal publication date of his highest-cited paper is 2007, it also has a 1999 working paper version, and he was a student until 2005), so it is hard to disentangle his contribution to their impact from his more senior co-authors; (2) there is very little sign of notability for anything he's done since then (http://www.eecs.umich.edu/eecs/about/articles/2013/Beeminder.html this is the only in-depth independent source I know of for Beeminder, although it in turn cites a WSJ article that mentions the system more briefly), and (3) because of the lack of secondary sources it is difficult to write a properly sourced article about the subject, and per  articles about living people need good sources. I'm willing to change my mind if we get better secondary sources about what he has been doing since graduating, though
— User:David, 22:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)