Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middleton family (2nd nomination)
The question is whether the ''family'' is notable, not any individual member of it. The risk is that the article becomes a series of biographies of people not notable enough for their own separate articles cobbled together into one page. What I would expect is a general article about the family history etc, with individual members mentioned as appropriate within that history - and, perhaps, small subsections devoted to the more notable family members as an addendum. That concern aside, the family does appear to be notable. It is now linked to the House of Windsor. This is relevant and sufficient now, but consider also that the union is expected to result on the birth of a future monarch whose heritage will then include the Middleton family.  doesn't seem to prohibit that assumption, saying "individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place": it would obviously be notable and we have reliable sources confirming the couple intention to have children, eg the http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11770033 BBC. Furthmore, we have good, reliable, sources to populate this article and further attest to the notability of the family: the http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13050232 BBC for example (note also the links there to that article's sources), http://www.channel4.com/programmes/meet-the-middletons/episode-guide/series-1/episode-1 Channel 4, etc
— User:RichardOSmith, 11:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)