Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramanujan Machine
Going by the scholarly literature alone, it's at best |too soon to have an article on this. One just-published paper isn't nearly enough to base an article upon. And even if we had peer-reviewed |secondary sources establishing its significance, I doubt it would be |due more weight than a few lines in an article like automated theorem proving. The media coverage is churnalism
— User:XOR, 21:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:SECONDARY||WP:DUE (Wikipedia:Too soon)