Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Brooks
well for starters this appears to be a content dispute, and should be resolved as such.  Second... the article currently cites no sources to back up any claims towards  and is in fact completely |unverified.  This to me is absolutely grounds for deletion; but  sourcing exists.  Could someone opining ''keep'' add some sources? (and not the "blog"... that is not a |reliable source
— User:Isotope23, 18:51, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:AGF||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)