Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L Tower
Buildings are not handed an automatic free notability pass, in the absence of passing  on the sourcing, just because they happen to surpass a certain arbitrary height — so the building's height is irrelevant to whether it should be kept or not. The clincher here is Oakshade's efforts to improve the sourcing, not anything inherent to the building, and I can attest that additional sources also exist to improve it further: why, for instance, does this article say ''nothing'' about the ''crane'', citing sources like https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2018/09/11/crane-atop-the-l-tower-is-finally-removed.html this and https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/l-tower-highrise-crane-construction-delays-1.4821084 this and https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/l-tower-crane-1.3470108 this and https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2017/07/06/crane-on-top-of-downtown-building-finally-ready-to-come-down.html this? This is definitely notable, but it's the improved sources that clinch its notability and not just its height per se
— User:Bearcat, 16:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)