Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Hit 30 Countdown
per nom. I'm actually the original creator here, but I did so at a very different time in Wikipedia's history — in 2005, our notability standards weren't nearly as dependent on the distinction between |reliable and |primary sources as they are now. Rather, the fact of multistation syndication was considered an "inherent" notability claim for a radio program, such that as long as the program's own website technically |verified the fact as true, the program was "entitled" to have a Wikipedia article and exempted from ever actually having to cite any non-primary sources. That's no longer how it works, however — over the 13 years since, we've learned a lot of hard lessons about how much that approach left us open to advertorialism and even outright hoaxery, so our notability rules have been rightly and wisely tightened up a lot more. But this simply doesn't have the depth of coverage needed to meet the stricter standards that apply in 2018
— User:Bearcat, 12:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)