Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filecamp
Using the argument that "other stuff exists that should be deleted so this article should stay" (otherwise known as  or ) is not a viable argument. Not every app passes notability guidelines and if you feel that other apps do not pass , then feel free to propose them for deletion or bring them to AfD. (BTW, PROD posts are to stay up for 7 days and should only be removed if you have addressed the issues brought up, not because nobody has posted an answer to a question.) While I haven't personally made a decision yet, I can see that one of the biggest issues with the page is that all of the sources on the article are primary, meaning that they come from the company itself. Primary sources do not show notability and really can only be used if you have multiple independent and reliable sources to back up the claims. () The guidelines for what is considered to be a reliable source can be strict in and of itself, so if you ever have a
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)