Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're either with us, or against us
and rename He who is not with me is against me (taking Jesus as more canonical than Gaston (Beauty and the Beast)). This article should be considered as a stub-class historical development of a commonly and widely expressed thought (announcing lack of middle ground); for a polished example of this class, see ethic of reciprocity. Considered in this class, it should (and does) read like a historical review of usages that might appear, abbreviated, in Bartlett's. It is certainly , certainly encyclopedic, it was both of those before 9/11, and if there is  in a couple sentences that is not a deletion argument. The other deletion arguments read to me like  and wikilawyering. Also, this is an excellent add to :Category:Political catch phrases. I will also add a critical source
— User:John, 18:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:OR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)