Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecozoic
An encyclopaedia is supposed to have an entry on each '''coined term''' that does not belong in a dictionary. In just twenty minutes I could find the term being coined and described on ABC NewsRadio, in a paper on a university web site, etc. and I put just a few references in the article; there will be more - I hardly looked. It proves a lack of seriousness to put up an Afd for |non-notable or (here even and) |original research without even trying to find a proper reference. Should  not apply to a presentation for Afd? I do not care whether the '''topic''' is ''pseudoscientific mystical flapdoodle'', else we must erase either ''Catholicism'' or ''Islam'' - or would that have to be both
— User:SomeHuman, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY||WP:OR||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)