Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish solution
clearly the initial entire rationale for advocating the deletion of this page couldn't have been more wrong!  The term existed before, as a  would have (and has) revealed.  The nom should have been withdrawn at that point and it is quite, quite improper to now piggyback on the majorly flawed OP to raise extraneous "arguments" for anything other than a straight keep.  The railway industry term "Spanish solution" is quite important in the industry, for those familiar with the industry, i.e., ''the subject matter experts'', even if outsiders can spend five years wondering whether it is a term of art or not.   Now, once one understands this is a highly relevant and usable industry term, what could be more natural than citing examples of its current and past use?  The article stands on its own and is quite useful as is; any small weaknesses should be addressed by interested editors, and remember: AFD is not cleanup
— User:XavierItzm, 18:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)