Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway incident
This AfD is an obvious misapplication of  that was litigated previously per RecycledPixels above. The argument that because this is one of a large N that makes it less notable is fallacious. A larger population means more, not less, notable examples would be expected. For example, a larger country should have more notable people. The fact that we don't know who the man is because of privacy concerns is irrelevant too. And the argument that this case is "only" unusual because of the mask contradicts the argument that this is . In fact, because the mask use was so unique, it caused CBSA to issue an internal alert that was leaked to CNN, so this became an international story. We have in-depth follow-up coverage in multiple reliable sources on both the initial investigation, the asylum hearings in Canada, and the arrest, trial, and conviction of ground personnel in Hong Kong. I have added several more of these refs to the article. So this AfD should be closed because the discussion above is now moot
— User:Dhaluza, 01:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RUNOFTHEMILL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)