Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid
per nom. This article is a thesis (if not a badly written one). There are sources, yes, but they are used to argue a point instead of sourcing the contents. As you can see, the article is just a bunch of quotations - it does not reflect the real situation. Having sources also does not make it any more notable, as in . While I won't deny there are human rights problems in China, this article falls short as an original research. It being in a series also does not mean it should not be deleted. See . Besides, as observed earlier by other users like
— User:PalestineRemembered, 02:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:WAX (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)