Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M Sarki
The reason "|notability" and "|vanity" are invoked as criteria for deletion is less that they are an extension of " an indiscriminate collection" then because of real concerns that the subject of the article is so obscure that he/she/it will in all likelihood not attract a good mix of involved, semi-involved and univolved editors. Chances are the article will always stand as a POV piece written solely by partisan editors with a strong involvement with the subject, failing  and often  and  to boot. This article is a perfect example why notability should be a concern. It's a gush piece, it's scraping the bottom of the barrel with a rusty spoon what |reliable sources are concerned, and it's even #Don't sign what you don't own|signed by the main author who seems to be the publisher of the subject's poetry if not in fact the subject him/herself
— User:Trialsanderrors, 22:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NN||WP:VANITY||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:RS||WP:OWN (Wikipedia:Notability)