Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardian Units of Nations (2nd nomination)
but also favour '''delete'''. I for once agree whole-heartedly with TTN's actions. His merge was reasonable given the |notability, OT#PLOT|plot repetion |game guide problems, but reverted by certain other editor with who has made cleanup awkward on more than one occassion, who in this instance has utterly failed to |assume good faith, instead threatening to tell an admin he knows. Six months has been more than enough time to try to dig up sources and prove |notability, and the best that can be presented is "a fan forum to see what fans think of the organisation", which by its very nature automatically fails ,  and . Forums are rarely reliable sources for anything, and certainly are not in this case. Development and reception information should come from reliable, secondary sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, and based on the amount of work actually given to the article after the previous AfD, I'm inclined to believe such sources do not exist
— User:S, 22:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:AFG||WP:N||WP:V||WP:SPS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)