Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASCA International
A significant number of the sources above amount to a single sentence, or aren't about this organization at all (half the Google Scholar hits).  The other "Scholarly" hits are the website of a "Cyber Community Centre promoting events on Vancouver Island"—hardly a scholarly source—and a dissertation that mentions NASCA's website as a source in a single sentence, and a book that does little more than describe one page on its website (currently ref 2).  The rest of the options in "Google Books" suffer from similar problems, only worse, since most of them provide little more than the name and address.  Of the news articles, it looks like most of them name NASCA's website as a source or quote a person connected with it—again, the single-sentence trivial mention.  There's a lot of them (and, again, some of the hits are about Nasca, Peru or otherwise unconnected), but I don't think you could build anything longer than a permastub from these sources:  You could pretty much say "it exists" and "____ was a director" and "they have a website" and that's about it.  Only the Vancouver Island website says anything more than that about them, and that's a pretty weak source.  I don't believe that this complies with 
— User:WhatamIdoing, 06:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)