Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocence
The article is probably |spam and is most definitely not |notable. The article takes lines directly from a press release to assert its notability.  makes it clear that sources for notability must be independent of the subject e.g., not a press release (see also: ) Furthermore, registering a product with the FDA does not automatically make the product notable. The ferocity of the creator's defense, his lack of |assuming good faith, and the fact that he has only edited the Biocence article after returning from hiatus, makes me think he might have a |conflict of interest
— User:Lebowbowbowski, 04:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPAM||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:SPIP||WP:AGF||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Spam)