Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (6th nomination)
Categorization of people in the encyclopedia ''must'' be based on simple, precise and unambiguous criteria that is free of all controversy and requires no consensus whatsoever. This is not a list, it's a coatrack and a biased shame vehicle with nebulous and vague requirements for membership. If a scientist has valid reasons to disagree with some criteria of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, should they be included there as well, to punish them for having a slightly different opinion? It's bad enough that as a community we can't get our shit together regarding our systemic biases and complete lack of neutrality when dealing with certain topics and people we dislike, now we have to actually showcase them in a list? A list that has a complex inclusion criteria and disclaimer at the top (because what else can one call that), and that's been at AFD six times, no less. Delete, as a BLP vio, for failing ,  or anything else. This article should not exist
— User:FreeRangeFrog, 22:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)