Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biblical literalism
Arbeiter seems skilled at defending his edits, but we should still recognize this article as worthless. Wikipedia articles should never make mainstream Christians uncomfortable. Wikipedia is supposed to remain |neutral and ivil. DjSamwise's revisions are even worse. There are plenty of Biblical literalists. Repeatedly claiming they don't exist doesn't make it true. And because the Bible explicitly states Jesus spoke in parables, literalists recognize the parables of Jesus as such. DjSamwise's version offers misrepresentations of references and misrepresentations of terms (AKA "straw man" terms). DjSamwise even includes references conflicting his own thesis. It would be better if both versions simply disappeared
— User:Millstone, 10:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:C (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)