Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (4th nomination)
Editors are supporting deletion because they assert that the article violates . When Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (3rd nomination) was closed as "keep" in November 2016, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacob_Barnett&oldid=751718408 this was the state of the article. The article primarily contained facts about his schooling. It did not contain undue original research like a paragraph saying https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacob_Barnett&diff=786047983&oldid=786036102 Barnett solved a problem incorrectly on a TV program even though no reliable source has said this.To address the  concerns, I propose reverting the article back to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacob_Barnett&oldid=751718408 its November 2016 version, which had been stable for nearly two years since https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacob_Barnett&oldid=640752378 David Eppstein's trimming of the article in January 2015. I also propose removing the "child prodigy" descriptor so that editors won't feel the need to add information saying "the claims for his being a child prodigy were based on falsehoods".An article containing only the facts and no analysis about whether he is or is not a child prodigy will comply with  and .{{tl|db-a7}} will not be applicable because the presence of significant coverage in the "References" section will "credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject
— User:Cunard, 04:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:BLP||WP:BLP||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)