Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantic reasoner
I've culled all the non-notable entries (superficially, I didn't search for RS for the redlinks) in the lists in the article and transferred the possibly OR comparison table to the talk page for future work, and removed what looked like a couple of promotional bits. The lead needs to be rewritten according to reliable sources. But a GScholar search shows 524 hits for "semantic reasoner" and 4,590 hits for "semantic reasoning"; this seems like a highly notable concept. A notable topic and article problems that are surmountable, per . suggest keeping the article
— User:Mark, 19:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SURMOUNTABLE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)