Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Skell
Skell was a member of the NAS, which is a strong indicia of notability -- it's been argued all members of NAS are by definition notable.  A h-index of 20 in google scholar, which isn't bad for a scientist whose active research appears to have been primarily in the 1950s, given its presentist bias.  Two first author articles cited by 142 and 150 in google scholar.  Note to nominator -- His denialism isn't relevant to his notability, except insofar as  issues apply.  If you think  is applicable, then please say so; if it's not, then let's not try to bias the discussion of notability based on the man's views.  My assessment of "keep" is based on his chemical research, not his denialist views
— User:Lquilter, 21:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)