Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postcodes in Victoria (Australia)
Clearly, the concept of a postcode is notable, as is each country's implementation of the idea.  However, individual postcodes are not notable: if they are referred to at all, it is as a convenient name for a small geographical area (e.g., lazy sports writers writing "SW18" because they've already said "Wimbledon" a hundred times in their article), and the discussion is not about the code itself.  allows lists where all entries are non-notable but these ones are just directories so fall foul of . Wikipedia is also |not a mirror of Australia Post's website or anyone else's. I think it is best '''not to redirect''' as that increases the likelihood of the page being recreated and also provides a landing spot for search engine users. If we don't look like we have a full list of Australian postcodes in the encyclopaedia, people searching for that topic will end up at sites that actually do have one, instead of here
— User:Dricherby, 09:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CSC||WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTMIRROR (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)