Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shwebomin (2nd nomination)
No solid coverage in independent reliable sources.  It could be |userfied, as Soewinhan suggested, but (1) we'd have to have someone willing to take it, and (2) it would be best to delete it after a year or two should no improvements be made, since |we're not an indefinite webhost
— User:Nyttend, 22:37, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:USERFY||WP:HOST (Wikipedia:Userfication)