Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramanujan Machine
I'm the creator of the article with no COI with it. Just because an idea is not accepted by experts does not mean it should be removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a scientific journal  . Regardless how worthless/wrong a concept is it may still have encyclopedic value because of the coverage a subject is receiving. And this is the case here. The article meets  and . Tabloids have been going gaga over it and it's one more reason why Wikipedia article must be available to present a neutral point of view. Experts can help building the criticism section further using reliable sources. Also, someone connected with a subject requesting deletion is not a vaild deletion argument
— User:RationalPuff, 22:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:NOTLAB||WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)