Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taingda Princess
as per the comment above, she was emphasizing documented in reliable sources by historians because of her historical significance. She played a major part in the history of Burma. A daughter of Burma King does not make her notable automatically, but she had held the highest-level appointed administrative position as "Duke" of three territories, which makes her a high-ranking member of the Royal Court of Burma. I don't see how  applies here. Either way, since the book sources added it passes WP:GNG. I found these arguments in the Royalty project talk page. We are only to record. Not an ideal solution as this cuts out a lot of very important subjects due to lack of media sources. I really do not understand why people are using AfD as a weapon
— User:VocalIndia, 14:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)