Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of locations in the StarCraft series
as searching for the individual items on the list of Starcraft locations gets numerous hits on Google News and Google Books from which we could easily continue to build this article: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Starcraft+Aiur&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft+Aiur, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft+%22Antiga+Prime%22&btnG=Search+Books, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Starcraft+%22Bhekar+Ro%22&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft%20%22Bhekar%20Ro%22&ned=us&hl=en&sa=N&tab=np, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Starcraft+Braxis&cf=all, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft+Braxis&btnG=Search+Books, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft%20Brontes&ned=us&hl=en&sa=N&tab=np, etc. (at least one reliable news or book source exists for every item of the A and B locations; even “Starcraft“ and “locations“ gets book hits: http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft+locations see here).   As the results demonstrate, these locations have multiple appearances and mentions in numerous reliable sources, which in itself is a sign of notability and absolutely a sign of verifiability.  A thorough going through of these sources should be exhausted per  and  in this case as no one can legitimately suggest that the subject is neither notable nor verifiable.  Anyway, as a result of these sources already present in the article, and those that can still be added, the article clearly meets , , and .  Sincerely
— User:A, 18:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRESERVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:VGSCOPE||WP:GNG||WP:V (Wikipedia:Editing policy)