Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fish Information and Services
based on my being almost undecided.  Googling it produces few results, but http://www.fis.com/fis/mediakit/2007/overview-e.html shows a not insubstantial organisation, though I do appreciate that this may contain trade puffery.  The putative Norwegian article will be enough to tip me into a simple ''keep''.  I do recommend that the article is "de-advertorialed" and that other |reliable sources are found for it.  If the consensus is to delete I recommend temporary userfication to allow more work to be done before republishing.  Just losing the article seems to me to be silly
— User:Timtrent, 07:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)