Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenSIPS
I don't see any notability in the sourcing. Also, fwiw, PROD removal does not exempt an article from soft deletion via an AfD per the policy: administrators may soft delete at their discretion per , even if it has been deproded. This discretion might be to not delete this time because the deprod was so recent, but it would not be outside the policy to soft delete. Hopefully it won't come to that, though. {{bcc|Killiondude}} Edit: actually, I think soft deletion would be good here if we don't have more participants. The actual contested PROD was in 2013, not recently, and a how-to guide is not really the type of sourcing we look for. Soft deletion (assuming we don't get more participation) would work because the deprod had been years ago, and a lack of a quorum now after multiple relists would show that over time, the deletion had become non-controversial. Anyway, that is assuming we don't get more comments, which like I said, hopefully we will
— User:TonyBallioni, 00:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SOFTDELETE (Wikipedia:Deletion process)