Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Sullivan-Beckers
She meets GNG as scientific discoveries are not merely news events, and I believe she also meets criterion 7 of  "The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity" re: her discovery of a new species. Note that "Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area." She may also satisfy criterion 1 of NACADEMIC "'''Criterion 1 can also be satisfied if the person has pioneered or developed a significant new concept, technique or idea, made a significant discovery or solved a major problem in their academic discipline'''. In this case it is necessary to explicitly demonstrate, by a substantial number of references to academic publications of researchers other than the person in question, that this contribution is indeed widely considered to be significant and is widely attributed to the person in question". Besides this, her published works go beyond run-of-the-mill scholarly works, one of the more significant might be her chapter in ''The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Evolutionary Psychology''. Altogether, this seems to be a case for keeping
— User:IphisOfCrete, 17:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)