Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Strawn
This subject only begins to approach , and fails basic criteria of . Though there is substantial coverage, though ultimately by one reliable source, as pointed out by Mangoe. The summary of the Legal Affairs article in a second publication doesn't add much in the way of substantial coverage; it doesn't have anything that could support additional article content. Given the one (or 1.5 or 2) sources and the negative aspects of the coverage,  applies. It can't be said the subject is |well-known at all. Uzma and Mangoe have also both pointed out the negative content in coverage poses problems BLP-wise. I think that even if / were satisfied by additional reliable coverage, in this case, the BLP problems are reason enough to vote !delete
— User:JFHJr, 01:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BLPCRIME||WP:NPF||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)