Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Crayola crayon colors
Agree re: NPOV (No POV issues - someone needs to explain this rationale to me). Agree re: notable list (Yes - It's notable, as a large number of people (''and some Wikipedians'') have used this brand of crayons at some point in their lives). And having done the same colour testing as USer:Timothy Perper|Timothy Perper did here at Talk:List_of_Crayola_crayon_colors#Pure_Advertising:_It.27s_a_Commercial_for_Crayola|the relevant talk page I can see that whoever nominated the RGB and hex colours '''probably''' grabbed those color values from the colour swatches available on line at the http://www.crayola.com Crayola website. I slso don't think that this comes under , as it fits the criteria of '''routine calculations''' (color sampling via computer program being reasonably routine these days). But when all's said and done, what actually appears here seems to be a classic m:Inclusionism|inclusionist vs deletionist debate that really doesn't do ''''the project'''' any favours. For what it's worth, I think it's a perfectly valid article and I can see a time when a curious person would ask themselves the question "I wonder how many Crayola colors there are" and being rewarded with a great Wikipedia answer
— User:Mark5677, 11:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)