Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMBnet.journal
The 3 apparent SPAs concern me greatly. Especially as all 3 have suddenly come out of the woodwork after months, or more, of not editing to vote here. The number of visits each year is not evidence for notability. A lot of these so-called "citing articles" don't, on the face of it, appear to have anything to do with this journal, and if they do, they're not all exactly . Also, I'm pretty sure that arguing the journal is notable for having notable editors fails , as does any links between EMBnet.news and EMBnet.journal. I have not, however, searched for sources myself, and as such, won't vote
— User:Lukeno94, 21:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:INHERIT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)