Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Bollyn
the Pipes comments do not rise above the trivial (it's just another excuse for Pipes to write about his favourite subject, Daniel Pipes) and none of the other "sources" come close to being reliable (neither is Pipes in my view, but some may disagree). Not verifiable, no independent reporting worthy of the name, so in addition to failing the  hurdles, it cannot meet two of the three  requirements and should be stubbed if it is somehow kept
— User:Angusmclellan, 12:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)