Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Vista Optimizer
Let's analyze sources which establish . As of now, there are 5 references in the article. 1st is , clearly doesn't count for  purposes. Second is PCMag, recognized . The rest (software.informer, registercleanerstested, and ciol), are merely affiliate sites, and IMHO clearly don't qualify as . So, we have only one  to justify notability, and it clearly falls short of ''multiple sources'' requirement of . Verdict: delete
— User:Ipsign, 13:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:SPS||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)