Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X3SR
This band has six fairly good sources (sites that seem to have an editorial staff and somebody there to check the copy) as well as a lot of sources that are really off the mark. I've listed them at Talk:X3SR#References_for_this_article. I suggest that the badly sourced information simply be deleted and the well-sourced data be left in a vastly shortened article. When this band becomes world-famous then the article can be pumped up with other information from ''Rolling Stone'' or wherever. In the meantime, it seems to be Notable within the definition of and
— User:GeorgeLouis, 08:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:B (Wikipedia:Bots)