Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomic bombings of Japan as a form of state terrorism (3rd nomination)
Nomination is based on a misunderstanding of  .  states: "Since what qualifies as a "POV fork" is itself based on a POV judgement, do not refer to forks as "POV" except in extreme cases of persistent disruptive editing." Has there been "extreme cases of disruptive editing" in this case? If not the POV Fork argument has no merit., "Don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point" has absolutly no applicability here.  is about an editors behavior, not a content dispute
— User:Inclusionist, 18:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK||WP:POVFORK||WP:POINT||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Content forking)