Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities
we have a number of lists with cut-off points, it helps manageability of the length of lists.  The title of the list explains exactly what the list comprises.  I've seen that MilbourneOne has a list of personal issues about this, to which I've responded http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_aircraft_accidents_and_incidents_resulting_in_at_least_50_fatalities&diff=prev&oldid=563015130 here.  Quite why the aviation project is set on "delete as default" I have no idea.  We don't use categories for a coherent list of disasters.  We stopped using "... by location" or whatever several years ago.  In fact, defending a "... by location" list and then criticising a "... at least 50 fatalities" list is crazy.  Each define the content, and the presentation.  This list is intended to be useful to our readers, not the |owners of the Aviation project.   I have raised concerns with Godot13 that there are some elements that could be removed (as they seem unnecessarily |synthetic) so I'm not just waving a banner for this list.  But it shouldn't be deleted.  Finally, per
— User:JetBlast, 19:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OWN||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:Ownership of content)