Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Hartemink (2nd nomination)
It is true that the article appears to have been created by the subject. Thirteen years ago. It has had many other editors since then, most of whom were presumably not motivated by self-promotion. The only other argument made by the nomination is , specifically called out as something to avoid in deletion discussions. The citation record of the subject https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=-ToX7x0AAAAJ, with 18 publications having over 100 citations and an h-index of 42, is well above our usual standards for #C1, and he also appears to pass #C3 (as a fellow of a major academic society) and #C8 (as editor-in-chief of a well-established journal). The unsigned spa nominator's claims that these criteria are not met have no actual justification
— User:David, 23:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WAX||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)