Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Reed
She "has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." I agree it is not the greatest article for WP but she does meet . If historical significance was our test for notability than we would not need  or 
— User:Nolamgm, 01:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:PORNBIO||WP:ATHLETE (Wikipedia:Notability)