Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Douglas
WP:BLP1E in no way cancels any notability that she and her peers on the court enjoyed previous to the news reports of a sex scandal. She had an article for years before the lurid stuff came out in news reports. There is a whole category of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Canadian_women_judges Canadian women judges and scads of articles about judges at or below the level of her office. The fact that these article generally do not get nominated for deletion may be because there is a consensus to keep articles about judges of a certain rank. Try a group nom of all 45 or so biographies of Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba if you think there is no consensus for notability such as via . Don't just selectively delete when some http://news.google.com/news/story?q=%22lori+douglas%22+judge&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=d4hzIDHw_iN_e8Mfe4whA84LY9v3M&hl=en&ei=f7d-TNHWHIj_nQeD_vTvAQ&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=1&ved=0CBsQqgIwAA unsavory news comes along about one. The bio does not appear to violate 
— User:Edison, 20:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POLITICIAN||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Notability)