Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Walker III
I read the  intro again in view of the conversation here.  Is states "Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below."  LA Times has a daily circulation of 650,000+.  As a contrast, the Chillicothe Gazette has a circulation of about 15,000 (picked random small town newspaper with wikipedia article - here for Chillicothe, Ohio).  Even if of local interest, a subject featured in the LA Times would make the subject far more famous than in the Chillicothe Gazette.  The teams, games, and players of a Power Five conference school is far more important than a Ohio Regional Campus Conference school.  Likewise, the general popularity of UCLA and its sports teams is far greater than the Ohio University – Chillicothe's sports teams and this flows down to the athletes of those teams.  Even just thinking about the concept of something being "worthy of notice", this will slant towards major population centers.  All this considered, I think that also favors keeping (though still not moving from weak keep above because I would like to see a greater number of sources
— User:RonSigPi, 21:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)