Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JWASM
Can we stop discussing other user's imagined intentions or conduct, or the content of other articles. This is a deletion discussion about JWASM, and should be dedicated to discussing whether there are sufficient sources to establish the notability of JWASM (not its producers, or usefulness, or extent of use, or the content of the article) and thus whether it is a suitable subject for a standalone article. "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" does not include technical information on how to use the product. The final decision will be made by an uninvolved (and likely non-computer-expert) administrator based on quality, not quantity, of arguments - , , , 
— User:OrangeDog, 12:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:AGF||WP:AADD||WP:TLDR (Wikipedia:Notability)