Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Brimmer (2nd nomination)
It was clear in the previous AFD, that he fails ; the argument to keep in the last AFD is that he passed . And he still does. In the past AFD I raised two sources that were unchallenged http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2753267/Liverpool-youngster-Jake-Brimmer-scores-two-brilliant-free-kicks-Australia-U-16s.html one and http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/article/liverpools-aussie-scores-for-joeys-in-pre-world-cup-clash/raady0jt4ro31ubhr8o58edo5 two. Add in the ones above, and the keep argument is stronger than ever. And what's with the SALT from
— User:GiantSnowman, 05:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)