Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahitya Akademi Award to Dogri Writers
the $ value should have nothing to do with it, the question is ''reliable, 3rd party references''.  I note we have articles for every other language of the Sahitya Akademi.  My only concern is that the main SA article should really have more |reliable sources to make its notability clearer, as it only has two refs, and not particularly convincing ones.  Definitely keep this content, and I think a merge to the main SA article from every language variant would get bulky, but definitely need more footnotes for Sahitya Akademi (though outside the scope of this discussion
— User:MatthewVanitas, 10:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)