Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chemical compounds with unusual names (5th nomination)
as usual). As usual, there ''are'' objective standards and cited ref(s) for claims of "unusual"...as usual, approximately "if a reliable source says so". Whether the article needs some pruning (other editors adding whatever they think is unusual) vs sticking to  material is (as usual for this article) an editorial issue for this article. There is an explicit and verifiable scope and inclusion criteria. The article is not so long that it needs to be split. And there's no obvious objective criteria for deciding how to split either. But split != delete. But no prejudice against creating separate "list of chemicals named for..." if someone feels like it (and there are many that do fall into those categories that are not "unusual"). Why are we ''here'' and ''again
— User:DMacks, 01:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)