Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Korean War
based on the precedent set by World War Three, a well-written and informative article that doesn't go against . Sure, some of the material in the current version does, but there's no reason it couldn't be brought up to a standard like that of the WW3 article. It's important to distinguish, I think, that this and the WW3 article are not meant to be "what would happen if X and Y went to war" or something as random as "who would win in all-out war, Brazil or Argentina"; that kind of thing doesn't belong here. Both of these conflicts are things that have been researched, with expert opinions to cite, and are situations which could realistically present themselves at some point in the next few years. &nbsp
— User:Dalahäst, 07:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)