Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacquelyn L. Williams-Bridgers
unless somebody can show much more evidence that she actually has significantly better sources than this. Just because we happen to have an article listing the past holders of a government bureaucratic job does not in and of itself confer an automatic notability freebie on every single person named in the list — if she were properly demonstrated to have enough |reliable source coverage to clear , that would be one thing, but the role isn't "inherently" notable enough to justify leaning almost entirely on her own employer's self-published content, along with just one news story about an incident that would just make her a  if it's really all the media coverage she's got. Again: if she were much better referenced than this, then sure, but it's not such a vitally important role that she would be ''exempted'' from having to have better sources than this just because she held it
— User:Bearcat, 01:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)