Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Hawke's Bay
You are are confusing notability on Wikipedia with the fact that you think the flying school you are attending is important. It wouldn't matter if the company flies dozens of B-747s on scheduled runs every day, if there are no reliable third party references that have written about the company to the extent required by , then the company should not have an article on Wikipedia. What you know, that has not been documented in reliable third part references, is called |original research and it is not acceptable because other people will disagree with what you think you know. You can add that this company runs five charters a week and someone else will come along and say "no they don't, they went out of business two years ago". The only way we can tell which one is right is through reliable third party references, which is why the inclusion criteria for Wikipedia is |"verifiability not truth". Without this requirement Wikipedia would be nothing more than a blog where people argue over their own version of he Truth. The other factor here is that this company, while it surely does exist, is no different from ten thousand other flying school/air taxi operators around the world. It exists but there isn't much more to be said about it. My neighbour's cat exists and may even have its own You Tube channel, but it doesn't meet notability requirements and so should not have an Wikipedia article about it
— User:Ahunt, 12:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:T (Wikipedia:Notability)