Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carly Hill (2nd nomination)
I removed the tag because I read the relevant Wikipedia policies and thought that it did not qualify for speedy deletion via that criteria. Before I removed the tag, I wrote why I thought it didn't qualify for deletion at Talk:Carly_Hill#Contested deletion. The athlete is a two-time gold medalist at a global senior championship. There are at least twelve references from ten different independent secondary sources demonstrating non-routine coverage of the subject. That demonstrates substantial depth of coverage that far surpasses the  guidelines in my opinion, which overrules NSPORTS. The purpose of the NSPORTS guidelines is to supplement GNG and not to replace it (in fact the purpose is not to be authoritative in any sense as it is only an indicator of whether sources can be found), and I think that the athlete meets GNG. Also, I don't think it's very fair to say the tag was removed by "someone" without even mentioning my rationale for removing the tag (which is, again, on the talk page) when you could have pinged me by my username
— User:Habst, 03:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)