Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonial/Modern Gender System
as per Roscelese and Troutman and Orasis, okay, everybody up there, plus an additional problem is that it is essentially |original research by one scholar, an Argentinian-born radical feminist, which would be permitted in Wikipedia if there were reliable |secondary sources commenting on the theory, explaining it, arguing with or against it, but I did not find sufficient evidence of this happening. I did not find the term used in my numerous newspaper sweeps; I did find a source http://books.google.com/books?id=tDCuX0y6ZnMC&pg=PA66&lpg=PA66&dq=%22colonial+modern+gender+system%22&source=bl&ots=WR8-TRKaNC&sig=YPc6qB8_oRHUxvvTRRgwktYhUSY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ljwcVIO_Afb8sASM04GADg&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=%22colonial%20modern%20gender%20system%22&f=false here which discusses her theory at length by another scholar named Alison Bailey. My searches without filters did not find much which was not written by Lugones. QED delete
— User:Tomwsulcer, 14:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:No original research)