Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago Bears statistics
I question whether NOTSTATSBOOK is the proper grounding. But I do believe this list is of dubious notability under  as we have no evidence that the subject "has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources" as suggested by LISTN. I also have problem with the lack of cohesiveness of the topic, and also a concern that it represents . Team records, on the other hand, appear to me to be a cohesive and legitimate list topic
— User:Cbl62, 01:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)