Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santorum (disambiguation) (2nd nomination)
The argument made by Theoldsparkle (hatnote instead of dab page) is perfectly sound as a matter of principle.  As a matter of practice, it's hopelessly unrealistic.  The effort to insert and keep that hatnote would almost certainly fail, and even if successful would require enormous investment of editor time, lasting approximately forever.  The intensity of the desire to suppress any and all information about this topic means that we have to put up with some practical accommodations that wouldn't be necessary if everyone had Theoldsparkle's commitment to 
— User:JamesMLane, 05:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)