Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of musical works in unusual time signatures
at least one entry is well sourced - pruning of unsourced entries of the list is not a concern for AfD.  '''This article is incomplete, and likely to remain so''' is a terrible criterion for deletion.  It'd result in the deletion of most articles on wikipedia.  Nor is ''maintaining this article is a lot of work'' a good argument.  The article ''is'' being maintained - if someone wants to put in the time and effort to create a good article, it's hardly the wiki spirit to say "You're working too hard - stop building such a good encyclopaedia".   In the end, the article is '''sourced''' and it is '''encyclopaedic'''.  It fits well with .  It's in good shape.  There's absolutely zero reason to delete it
— User:WilyD, 22:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTS (Wikipedia:Lists)