Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alanna Shaikh
The sole question at AfD is notability, which can be be established either directly with multiple reliable independent secondary sources addressing the subject in detail as required by  or presumptively, e.g., as a .  I reviewed each of the sources cited in the article and made a good faith attempt to search for others.  My conclusion is that the sources to support notabity do not exist.  Her own articles are obviously , but so are the  and passing mentions where she's quoted on various topics.  I simply could not find the sources I would need to support a keep.  I also do not believe she qualifies for presumptive notability based on either TED fellowship (not quite the same as, e.g., an IEEE fellowship) or as a scholar based on her meager https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=gsb90&q=Alanna%20Shaikh&lookup=0&hl=en citation count.  I came here from the discussion of systemic bias at  talk page to get a background on the issue.  But this is not the poster child for claims of bias.  This is someone who's just not (yet?) notable under our guidelines
— User:Msnicki, 16:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SCHOLAR||WP:PRIMARY||WP:INTERVIEWS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)