Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrej Brodnik
on my opinion rendered above. Having read through the points raised here (sorry for being so dismissive to publications in proceedings, I thought that theoretical CS was like maths and that important results are published in journals, possibly in addition to publication in proceedings), I still don't see what distinguises him from the average academic. My own opinion on notability for academics corresponds roughly to , but in my reading none of the criteria in that proposal applies. However, my opinion is very '''weak''', especially because I think that if the consensus (or the lack thereof) on notability as evidence in AfD discussions on other subjects would be applied to academics, then the article would have been kept
— User:Jitse, 06:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROFTEST (Wikipedia:Notability)