Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan H. Gardner
I was initially split, but I found that those supporting deletion (Bearcat, JPL, Gnome etc.) provided rationales complicit with policy. Being first, to my knowledge, in an otherwise unnotable county office is not in accordance with anything I read at |NPOL and |GNG. I see the "are we running out of server space?" |argument to avoid has also reared its ugly head. A good illusion is made with the ite overkill|cite overkill, but analysis of the sources reveals primary sources, passing mentions, and |routine coverage
— User:TheGracefulSlick, 01:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:ATA||WP:C||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)