Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Perera (Old Cambrians cricketer) (2nd nomination)
although I would also be happy with a '''redirect''' in the short term in order to preserve the article text whilst either further research continues or a wider review, taking opinions from throughout the project, of the notability guidelines for cricketers (and possibly the other sports specific criteria) takes place. My reasoning for delete is that NCRIC is being interpreted in a simplistic boolean fashion when, in cases such as this, I feel the lack of verifiability is a major factor which must be taken into consideration. , the direct parent of  is no where close to being met. The fact that NCRIC differs so markedly from SPORTCRIT (which mirrors the GNG so much better) as well as the simplistic boolean approach is my reasoning for thinking that there needs to be a review of NCRIC. In this specific case we essentially have a scorebook entry. This has, at some point, found it's way onto a database, possibly via a book, and then that database has found its way to CA and CI. All very well and good, and if I want a score book style entry I'll go there. Without any form of additional information to verify the identity of the individual concerned I feel that the verifiability of the article is in too much doubt for us to include within this project. This doesn't mean that other cricketers with just one first class, List A or T20 appearance will necessarily fall into the same category, just as it doesn't mean that a cricketer without an appearance in any of those types of games is necessarily non-notable and should be precluded from inclusion
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPORTCRIT||WP:NCRIC (Wikipedia:Notability)