Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civmec (2nd nomination)
Giving due weight to the two comments immediately above, per HighKing. Pretty sure he has a better grasp on what constitutes notability after 13 years than Deus et lex has garnered in 8 months, and HKs analysis is spot on. Trade rags are virtually always created from press releases and if you want others to believe that somehow the one you're touting is different, the burden is on you to make arguments to  about the source to convince others. Notability and importance have no relationship; other people have objected to the quality of your sources. You're not going to change anyone's mind by simply asserting over and over that your analysis is correct. Special:Contributions/174.212.222.202|174.212.222.202
— [[User talk:174.212.222.202|talk]]), 00:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)