Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phasebuilder
I have done some PLC design work in the past but have never heard of this - although that is not conclusive, I don't have extensive experience in the field.  However, it is not often that I do a Google search on a borderline product and get http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK318&q=Logicon+Phasebuilder&start=0&sa=N only 12 hits.  Five of those are Logicon, its subsidiaries and directories listing it.  Two are Wikipedia and mirrors.  Three are broken or dead and one is an exhibition stands listing.  So, an article written from the sources would be able to state two |verifiable facts: the product was once demonstrated at an exhibition and it has a Wikipedia article.  I think we can bring that down to one shortly
— User:Spinningspark, 21:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)