Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure
maybe merge a small stub of the info into the Amazon article. There are a lot of books published, and I'd say as a general rule a book that can't find an actual publisher is almost certainly not notable. The article actually contains not that much about the book itself, but it doesn't appear to be scholarly work or otherwise of value. The only reason to keep the article is the controversy. If the article ''is'' kept, it should definitely be renamed to something like ''The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure'' controversy. But what is there to say about the controversy, really? Not much. And , and we are an encyclopedia rather than a tabloid broadsheet, and notoriety is not the same notability.  Anything that needs to be said can be said in a couple of sentences in the Amazon.com article
— User:Herostratus, 06:05, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)