Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interface: a journal for and about social movements (2nd nomination)
Since this AfD has the potential to explode quickly into personal charges and counter-charges,  I am going to summarize the evidence as quickly and politely as possible, and then hope that everyone will keep his head.  First of all, anyone whose name appears on this table of contents http://www.interfacejournal.net/2012/05/interface-volume-4-issue-1-the-season-of-revolution-the-arab-spring-and-european-mobilizations/ should, in the interest of academic integrity and objectivity, recuse himself from participating in this debate.  The backstory is this:  The editor of this journal, who is a total  acting out of , is here to promote his journal.  One of the ways he has done so is to M direct links to his website on at least ten other WP articles.  When confronted with this behavior, he replied that he is an academic and a scholar who is primarily concerned with citation, citation, citation, and that everyone who calls him on , M, and  has failed to understand citation, because these critics are not scholars.  The mile-high irony in all of this is that the article he wrote about his own journal is '''''utterly lacking in a single acceptable  citation!!!'''''  The journal is not even remotely notable, not by any previous Wikipedia guideline, policy, or convention.  These points were made at the previous AfD by editors other than myself, and the article was kept only because of lack of consensus.  This lack occurred only because the magazine's editor and--as it turns out--one of the magazine's actual '''contributors''' managed to polarize the discussion.  Obviously, both of them should recuse themselves this time around, and this matter should finally be decided by  and the notability guidelines for journals
— User:Qworty, 23:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPA||WP:COI||WP:SPAM||WP:COI||WP:SPAM||WP:SPA||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)