Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Olson
The subject is not entitled to a presumption of notability per  or , but probably satisfies  based on the coverage in two of the article's three sourced footnotes alone----and that's before I started to review Cbl62's list of sources above.  While this article raises an interesting question of whether or not the subject rises to the level of ''encyclopedic'' significance for inclusion, as long as Wikipedia continues to define "notability" in the manner in which it does, many college football quarterbacks of no particular accomplishments will continue to have stand-alone Wikipedia articles simply because of the volume of coverage that they receive.  Subjectively evaluated, there's little that recommends his inclusion: he was a part-time starter with a history of season-ending injuries, middle-of-the-road passing statistics, no championships, and no national awards.  It's one of the glaring flaws of Wikipedia's notability standard, but that's a policy discussion for another day.  In all events, his infobox should be reverted to that of a college football player (not NFL player), as his notability, such as it is, is based entirely on his history as a CFB player, not his non-existent NFL career
— User:Dirtlawyer1, 13:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NCOLLATH||WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)