Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arid Uka (2nd nomination)
to the shooting article: Textbook case of : {{tq|A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person.}} This proposition can be very easily checked. Consider the version right https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arid_Uka&oldid=803611987 now. Look at the "Background" section and check the citations. Leave aside https://books.google.com/books?id=sdUxBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA57 this source from "Anchor Publishing", which is a self-publishing http://www.anchor-publishing.com/ outlet, and thus source shouldn't be in the  article at all. ''Every single one of the sources'' cited in this section is in connection with the shooting. Here, I'll list out some of the headlines of the articles for you (translated if in German
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRIME (Wikipedia:Notability)