Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bicycle law in California (2nd nomination)
First, most if not all interpretations of the vehicle code in this article are supported by secondary sources, including: Wachtel, Forester, Bluejay, Mionske, Pein, and Bernardi.   I also suggest this is a special case, and perhaps |IAR needs to be invoked.  Let's at least consider whether Wikipedia is improved by the deletion of this article.  To that end, according to http://stats.grok.se/en/201210/Bicycle%20law%20in%20California traffic statistics, this article routinely gets 1500-2000 hits per month.  Considering it's such a narrow topic (which also explains the scarcity of secondary sources on the topic), that's pretty impressive, and demonstrates the utility and value of the information in the article to our readers.  It should also be noted that the published vehicle code is not a typical problematic primary source.  It is written specifically for the public at large and so that anyone can understand it.  I fail to see how Wikipedia is improved by removing this article, based solely on rules designed to remove material that creates problems which are not created by this article
— User:Born2cycle, 19:52, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)