Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Person, woman, man, camera, TV
The reasons given in several of the "delete" contributions above are unpersuasive. , and in particular its section , does not speak in favour of deleting articles. It's mostly not about creating or deleting articles but about avoiding undue focus on recent events in existing articles. Where it does mention deletion, it makes several points against it: "Still, these articles are valuable for future historical research."; "'''Just wait and see.''' Remember there is no deadline, and consensus can change later on. Editors writing today do not have a historical perspective on today's events, and should not pretend to have a crystal ball."; " Proper perspective requires ... the passage of time." Claiming that we already know that this currently highly notable phrase will not be notable in the future is not in line with these guidelines
— User:Joriki, 18:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RECENT||WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Recentism)