Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy
Per , this is notable because, "An event is presumed to be notable if it receives significant, non-routine coverage that persists over a period of time. Coverage should be in multiple reliable sources with national or global scope."  This clearly has widespread non-routine coverage and affects federal law enforcement throughout the United States.  There is no requirement that an event be unprecedented (we have articles on every Super Bowl, and every presidential inauguration), although some parts of this do seem to be unprecedented.  It just has to be notable.  At least two aspects in particular are receiving non-routine coverage: 1. Preet Bharara was fired (he did not resign). 2. There are https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/30/nyregion/preet-bharara-says-he-will-stay-on-as-us-attorney-under-trump.html earlier reports that he was previously asked to stay on.  No strong preference on the title
— User:Mattflaschen, 22:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:EVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)