Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Me, Matthew!
We'd need to be able to verify some of the sources that aren't on the Internet. For example, the article asserts that the film was reviewed by the Herald Sun, but the news source's title is "68 films to be shown at gay film festival". The title implies that these are films that have yet to be screened at the festival and that the news source is a list of films with brief synopses that are possibly based on press releases or information provided by the festival. In other words, this type of article is unlikely to be a review since most of these are articles written before the author has had a chance to review the film. The sources that can be verified just show that it screened at various film festivals, which is almost never something that would assert notability. It's assumed that the average film would screen at various festivals, so this isn't something that would give notability at Wikipedia. Also, sources like http://boston.edgemedianetwork.com/entertainment/movies/Features//94406/ri_film_fest_hosts_235_films,_honors_shatner this one are considered to be predominantly routine notifications of events since it looks to be heavily based on a press release. The award from the WHIFF wouldn't be considered one that would give notability because as far as Wikipedia is concerned, the film festival and its awards are too minor for its purposes. It's harsh, but there are so many film festivals out there that give awards that WP has had to limit things to awards ceremonies that have received heavy enough coverage to where the ceremony/award/festival would warrant an article, which doesn't seem to be the case here. http://nypost.com/2008/06/05/starr-report-kathie-lee/ This link is just a passing mention so it'd be considered 
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TRIVIAL (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)