Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ra (channeled entity) (2nd nomination)
The article satisfies |notability with the references provided, which meet .  does not apply here, since the definition of fringe in  is: "ideas that depart significantly from the prevailing or mainstream view in its particular field of study". The particular field of study is paranormal, ufology, new age religions etc., so how a well educated wikipedia user can claim the departure of the topic from mainstream view? Nevertheless, there are evidences of serious academic coverage (as if this is the criteria in wikipedia, you should educate yourself more on wikipedia policies and rules) in the field of philosophy by Stephen Tyman, and in the field of Transpersonal Psychology by Arthur Hastings. What relevance, of me having |ownership issues, is there with this AfD? Discussing is not throwing unsupported claims and fallacious arguments into talk pages with incivil style. Those "discussions" in talk pages and this AfD are just gaming the system to me , and definitely requires the intervention of arbitration committee
— User:Logos5557, 11:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:FRINGE||WP:FRINGE||WP:OWN||WP:GAME (Wikipedia:Notability)