Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on Game Design (2nd nomination)
as not passing  with ''multiple'' reliable independent in-depth sources. Previous AfD "keep" arguments are very unconvincing and do not address GNG at all. The authors are notable, yes; the book is popular, yes; I've even personally used it and cited it. But that doesn't make it automatically notable for a Wikipedia article. There is one http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/130500/book_review_andrew_rollings_and_.php Gamasutra review, and that counts as a great GNG source (and pretty much assures an entry in any "list of ... books" article it might belong in). Unfortunately, everything else I can find are just catalog/directory/store entries and a few unreliable reviews/descriptions. The http://www.otakunozoku.com/ernest-adams-and-andrew-rollings-on-game-design/ review in the article doesn't appear to be a reliable source. —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 14:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)