Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science humour
There are zillions of jokes. I highly doubt that explaining each and other of them is a way for writing encycopedia. All wikipedia rules apply. Firtst, trivial as it may seem, unreferenced explanations are just what they are: |unreferenced, possibly |original research. Second, there are jokes and jokes. Some of them deeply penetrated the culture, spawned a number of imitations and/or have aninteresting history. In this case ee can have separate artice for a '''single''' joke, just as we have separate aricles for single slang words or witticisms. But again, references for '''academic discussion of the topic''', please
— user:mikkalai, 18:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CITE||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)