Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most expensive objects
fails |synthesis in |vague scoping and dubious interconnection and comparison. A list of most expensive auction sales would be more encyclopedic. A list of most expensive retail items (wines, perhaps) also has a shot. A list of even the most expensive construction projects is at least going somewhere |verifiably comparative. I'm not saying any of these would pass AFD, but they have a better chance than this Everything2-ish article
— User:Dhartung, 04:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYN||WP:OR||WP:V (Wikipedia:No original research)