Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obligations in Freemasonry
The fact that the article's content was removed with a reason that was a complete lie, and then immediatly put up for deletion once the content was gutted, should be a red flag to any administrator watching this page.  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Obligations_in_Freemasonry&diff=101943410&oldid=100998915 This edit on the talk page that justifies the removal of all that material as a "copy vio" is a blatant lie, it's hard to  when an editor does something so obvious as this.  It's copy pasted content from a Public Domain book, it's avaliable for all to easially see by going to a website, the text is there letter for letter and puncuation for puncuation, yet somehow the editor decided that they don't match up.  The editor who removed the material then put up a prod with a reason "The article was intended as a crude "exposure", and without the copyvio that entailed, the article does not say very much, nor is there much to be said that is not already included
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)