Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richmond extensions of the Central Line
I'll concede it might not have been a hoax; I know that the author has been accused of adding intentionally inaccurate information in other articles and I hadn't been able to confirm the information in this one. I still stand by this deletion, however, since the article is essentially a list of links to other articles (see ) yet almost all of the articles have been deleted. Also, as Phil Bridger has pointed out this subject is covered adequately in the Central Line article already
— User:Atama, 16:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LIST (Wikipedia:Lists)