Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to the Future timeline (3rd nomination)
per Wikipedia:KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED.  The article is notable, encyclopedic, and well-sourced.  It is a notable and popular enough topic that, if deleted, it would only resurface again shortly after.  There's no  here; much of it is simple restatement of things given in an original source.  There is no thesis presented, thus there is no research pushed forward
— User:Celarnor, 17:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)