Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
and ''ballance'''. From  ''Verifiability, not truth'' so whether this is "nonsense" does not come into the equation. What is perhaphs a more appropriate policy is  ''Undue weight''. Firstly is having this article giving undue weight to a particular conspiracy theory? Seeing as how it seems to be the domininant alternative account, covered by a wide varierty of mainstream media I would say not. A second question which does not relate to this AfD is whether this article gives ''undue weight'' to the pro controled demolition advocates against those who disagree with this theory. Jones and Hoffman raise several important questions: namely why were the collapses so neat and tidy, none of the references in the critisim section really address this question
— User:Salix, 18:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Verifiability)