Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Coles (businessman)
This has been a |Heymann improvement from the paid piece which I declined.  As noted by other editors, the article clearly satisfies |biographical notability.  In the short run, keeping the article improves the encyclopedia.  In the longer run, |conflict of interest editors will see that the |system has been gamed, and that |autobiographies and paid |biographies can be submitted, and are likely to be reworked to neutral or nearly neutral form by reviewers.  So it is definitely in their interest to submit autobiographies and paid pieces, because they are likely to be accepted, and they might get through in a form that has not been fully neutralized.  The system has been gamed.  Reviewers need to be even more vigilant than in the past to look for |promotional articles and rework them.  Keeping is wrong, because it encourages promotional edits, but deleting would be more wrong.  There is no right answer
— User:Robert, 02:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:HEY||WP:NBIO||WP:COI||WP:GAME||WP:AUTOBIO||WP:BLP||WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)