Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent evidence for Apollo Moon landings
with Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations.  My interpretation of  does not provide for making separate articles for cited POV's.  If the information is notable, then it should be cited and reside right next to the contrary position's notable and cited content.  By making separate articles each catering to a particular POV, you may avoid conflict between editors, but you do the reader a disservice. Some readers are likley to read just the one article, which devoid of a balanced NPOV, is unfair.  If the article is too long, then consider trimming out the fat... if there is no fat to trim, then maybe it is ok to be long... or maybe the article needs to be split up, but not based on the POV of the content
— User:Jerry, 02:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)