Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-Blended Impressionism
to Roy Maloy. Art genres are not automatically notable, they must meet  and other policies. Wikipedia is not for publicizing your newly-invented genre. This is not a widely used stylistic term, it is something invented by one person to describe his own work. And Maloy is not a well-known artist: he seems notable if you include his circus skills but I can't find any serious critical discussion of his art, just a couple of human interest stories that say a circus performer has shown paintings. Until the term is used by art critics (plural) rather than just quoting Maloy, it's not a notable term just a |neologism of Maloy's. The term is mentioned in Maloy's article, which should satisfy anybody's good-faith attempt to explain Maloy's work; making it a separate article gives the false impression that this is a movement that goes beyond Maloy
— User:Colapeninsula, 14:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Notability)