Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umar haque
The coverage is following a typical 'flash' cycle - some initial coverage https://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm="Umar%20haque" around Jan 17 when the case was heard, followed by lots of coverage https://news.google.com/news/story/djQxHX22UOkydCMdR3qif_J2eW5OM?hl=en&ned=us&gl=US a huge burst of coverage right around March 3 when the verdict come out. That is pretty much the typical "relatively short news cycle" referred to by |PERSISTENCE and unless we see some significant coverage outside those time frames it fails that criteria. |RAPID anticipates that |PERSISTENCE will be met but, even a mere couple of weeks on, it is apparent that it has not. Therefore keeping the article under |RAPID is not appropriate although I have no objection to is being saved as a draft which is a recommended alternative to deletion
— User:Jbhunley, 19:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:RAPID||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:RAPID (Wikipedia:Notability)