Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Elmore
I find myself respectfully agreeing with Drawn Some fairly frequently of late but this is the first time I've rebutted his keep vote. However notable this guy may or may not be, primary sources are not sufficient for  or , this seems to be purely a vanity page that cites more vanity pages. Creating lots of webpages on oneself does not make one notable
— User:HJ, 15:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)