Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Emken
Unsuccessful candidates for political office not notable for any other reason are not notable per 's initial two criteria. The key test is whether she has major coverage across a variety of reliable and independent sources, which she does not. Four links are dead, and appeared to just be candidate aggregators. One (autism speaks) is not independent of her and the Los Angeles Times article is just noting her candidacy. The only meaningful part of the article is her work on Autism, which in itself doesn't appear notable and is essentially reliant on a single source
— User:Maswimelleu, 10:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:Notability)