Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs containing the I–V–vi–IV progression
just to cite policy : "If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article" there couldn't be more clear targets for merging, in line with MOS:TIMELINE. In case this is ignored and the article is deleted, I would recommend to anyone who cares for the lists to help finish adding all the songs to Category:Songs containing the I–V-vi-IV progression and start another for the other article. Even if this(these) article(s) is(are) deleted, there is no policy that says that notable items with references cannot be added into a shorter list in the parent articles, though there would be no redirect and history would be erased. From my POV they could not be more relevant to the parent articles, providing examples of the music discussed there. Also, the list failing comprehensiveness is certainly not a reason to delete and indiscriminate is open for debate, given they are stand alone lists with parent articles
— User:Footlessmouse, 11:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)