Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy gameplay
I'm unsure right now, but Hobit does have a valid point regarding not necessarily violating . However, I ''am'' concerned about the high quantities of original research present as well as relative lack of real-world relevance. Moreover, this http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/video/15influential/p16_01.html source in the "Reception and Legacy" section indicates that the ''Final Fantasy'' games – not the series' gameplay – have been considered influential. "Well-sourced" doesn't necessarily equate to meeting  when all you do is include information sources not necessarily relevant to the series' gameplay (most of them culled from other ''Final Fantasy'' WP articles) and attempt to blend them together
— [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]], 23:51, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:N (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)