Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LostPoet
per nom, due to an utter lack of |reliable sourcing. Going through , I haven't found anything better. |User-generated and self-published web content do not establish any modicum of notability. And despite the claims generally made in the lead, this subject is far from even approaching  or 
— User:JFHJr, 19:19, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:BEFORE||WP:BLPSPS||WP:NACTOR||WP:CREATIVE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)