Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jargon of The Rush Limbaugh Show (4th nomination)
I see 181 references in that article, roughly half of which are ''not'' to the Rush Limbaugh show.  It is obviously not "statistics" in any sense.  If you have problems with original research you should be trimming sentences, not deleting the article.  For that matter, even if the article were to fail AfD criteria this time, why not just revert the whole article back to the version for AfD Number Three or AfD Number Two when it was ''not'' found to deserve deletion?  People shouldn't be able to keep running an article through the AfD process endlessly until they get "lucky".  And  is an essay, not a policy; nor does it advise indiscriminate deletion; and if we were to start deleting such articles I'd prefer to start with all the featured articles for video games, as they are of much less historical significance than politics
— User:Wnt, 02:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRUFT (Wikipedia:Fancruft)