Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd R. Woodson (2nd nomination)
To quote the |deletion review page "Deletion review review considers disputed deletions and disputed decisions made in deletion-related discussions and speedy deletions."  As far as I'm aware no-one is disputing the original deletion or the decision reached so deletion review is not the appropriate venue.  The article having been recreated G4 should have (and was) considered but, in my opinion, correctly deemed not appropriate as the article, having been improved, no longer met the "a sufficiently identical and unimproved copy" #G4|criteria and I also believe it was no longer "substantially identical" to the original.  Both of these are matters of interpretation but per |deletion policy "If there is a dispute over whether a page meets the criteria, the issue is typically taken to deletion discussions" therefore I feel this article has ended up in the right venue.  Disclosure: I removed the speedy tag the second time after it was inappropriately re-added as it had been removed by someone other than the page creator (i.e. at the time I removed it again on process grounds not on its merits).  However I have also stated that I was not adverse to another AfD.  My view on whether this article should be deleted is below
— User:Dpmuk, 22:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DRV||WP:CSD||WP:DP (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)