Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeek
The sources are blatantly  and using these for notability is a violation of . Many of these sources quote the organisations employees and use it as a story source which is explicitly not allowed by . I am amazed that the Forbes/sites (not Forbes) has been considered a reliable source when it is very obvious that there is no journalistic oversight. In many of these sources presented, the amount coverage is so limited that the entirety of it has been pasted into this AfD. That's not indepth coverage. The rest of the "news" is essentially very brief pieces about funding which clearly show that they have been placed by the company. None of this is useful for notability. More importantly, I see this as a case of a COI editor pushing to "keep" the article
— User:Lemongirl942, 05:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPIP||WP:NOTPROMO||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)