Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Temple-Wood
Per Iridescent.  Yes, that's right, the notability bar IS so low that all those "non-encyclopedic" people do meet the GNG, and DO get articles if someone cares to write them.  Does that mean pop-culture gets overrepresented? Absolutely: the sources are plentiful and easily accessible, unlike things found only in dead-tree books, which functionally means almost anything before 1990, but that IS the notability rulebook under which AfDs have been decided, like it or not.  Likewise, the  and  arguments are completely off base: What "event" is the subject associated with? A "campaign" to create articles on women scientists is not an event by any |reasonable definition of the word: an event cannot readily be logically broken down further into separate events, and each creation of an article is a separate event.  Further, she's not |low profile, and so thoroughly fails the middle prong of the three-point  test
— User:Jclemens, 09:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:WI1E||WP:WIALPI||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)