Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bond 24
I don't get why every time an article on a future article pops up on namespace, someone ''has'' to cite  or . Especially for cases like this, we should be looking at |this policy instead. We do not have to stick to same old policy every time and each AfD discussion has its own merits and warrants its own results. Since SchroCat |has cited Bond 23, let's talk Bond 23. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bond_23&oldid=185970692 This diff shows how it was in 2008, four years before release. Does it look anything like what Bond 24 is like now? Put it short and sweet, merging/redirecting/deleting this does the project more harm than good. Hence my !vote choice. Thank you
— User:Bonkers, 12:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFF||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:FFEXCEPTIONS||WP:OTHERCRAP (Wikipedia:Notability)