Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Marks
and allow recreation. The current article has major problems that  might best be used to fix but he is notable. It was created as an unsourced biased puff piece and still reads like that. Refs were thrown in seemingly at random to make it looked well sourced. Ref 4 (Fin Review) does not verify the sentence it follows, it makes no mention of Marks education. With that deception can we trust the rest of the article? Below is some of the available refs which add up to enough coverage to start a new article with
— User:Duffbeerforme, 05:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)