Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great White Brotherhood
I find myself surprised to be agreeing with the nominator here, as with such a long list of references I didn't expect to actually be able to verify the claim that none of the sources are good enough.  But I can see they aren't.  In most cases, the publisher's name is directly connected to this movement.  Most of the rest aren't published at all.  The few remaining after that are apparently obscure original publications from the early 20th century.  This strikes me as parallel to : these are concepts specific to a world view found in a few written works.  There's no outside importance to this, none presented in the article, and no sources that suggest any outside importance exists, and I think that would be needed here
— User:Mangojuice, 21:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FICT (Wikipedia:Notability)