Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Online Film Critics' Poll
per  and . I see that in the link offered by Betty Logan we have a request made of Mr. Taddeo simply for an opinion with no suggestion that the opinion be positive, and neutral enough and not so widespread as to fall under .  IE: |"In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus".  Had the request been posted far and wide and requested only positive feedback to influence this discussion, THEN we'd have CANVAS. Toward the notability of non-Anglo-centric topics, we happily accept |non-English sources to aid in our addressing an unintentional systemic bias agianst non-Anglo-centric topics. I would also suggest that we consider creation of an article on the International Online Film Critics themselves, to further increase our reader's understanding of the topic of their poll. And no... I was not asked for my opinion, but came across this discussion through my own patrolling of film-related AFD delsorts
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 22:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CSB||WP:NRVE||WP:CANVAS||WP:NONENG (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)