Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edith Jordan Gardner
Well, there seems to be consensus here that this person meets the ; that is, in case anyone has forgotten, just a guideline. As it tells us, "significant coverage |in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article—perhaps because it violates Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|what Wikipedia is not, particularly the rule that Wikipedia:INDISCRIMINATE|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information". For a person to have a Wikipedia article, he or she needs to have actually done something of some significant interest or importance, unlike this person, who lived a fairly ordinary and uninteresting life typical of a person in her social position at the time. I suggest again that of the fairly limited coverage she received, a good part at least is due to her very notable father. To the "keep" !voters: if she is so significant, where is the coverage of her in modern reliable sources
— User:Justlettersandnumbers, 19:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)