Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellaria Sand
According to C2 of efore, editors should consider leaving time for other editors to develop an article before nominating the article for deletion, if the article was recently created." but there is also URDEN - "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.", also editors who change a redirect to an article can do plenty of things to ensure articles aren't nominated quickly, the easiest thing is to ensure the article has pleny of |sources, start the article in your |sandbox before taking it 'live', place messages in relevant project/article talkpages saying what you're doing, ditto with the article talkpage so editors know that someone is working on it and hasn't just done a 'flyby' article, and of course there is always the Template:Under construction that lets editors know that an article is ... well, under construction
— User:Coolabahapple, 02:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:B||WP:BURDEN||WP:RS||WP:SANDBOX (Wikipedia:Bots)