Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Bloody Valentine War
The article clearly has tone and style issues and could benefit from at least rewriting.  However, what is astonishing to me as an observer is the behavior of those involved in this discussion.  A number of invalid or questionable arguments were put forth above, the article was turned into a redirect for 36 hours, and all in all this AfD phase has run roughshod over normal deletion procedure and criteria.  I am not stating that the article should or should not be deleted, only noting that the discussion above has repeatedly moved far afield of actual deletion issues such as notability. There have been valid arguments both for and against deletion, but the invalid ones seem for some reason to all be for deletion. (If you accept Farix's argument that Plau's statement is too brief to be valid, then there is one invalid argument against deletion.)  I cannot account for this under , and I find it troubling
— User:moritheil, 08:33, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FAITH (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)