Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Romano
The 'discernible reason' this was examined and then nominated is because I came across it while looking through CAT:NN; but that has nothing to do with the notability or otherwise of this character. It was also not nominated because it needs cleanup; that's irrelevant too. It is also not hugely relevant that the article :List of supporting characters in ER (which is not the article I suggested as best redirect) has limited detail. That article (or any) could be expanded, or this article could merge to an article - but not that one as it doesn't mention Robert Romano. All of that is just fluff - does this meet  guidelines? That is what we should be focused on
— User:Boleyn, 22:32, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Notability)