Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional toxins
per . Though not particularly badly written, sources are lacking to establish notability of the concept and the inclusion criterion is not clear, e.g. "basilisk venom" is not exclusive to J.K. Rowling, and, in terms of sources of toxins, it just appear to be some random collection of popular fiction universes or stories. Are the toxins really notable even within the fictional sources?  Again, compare the ''basilisk venom'' in Harry Potter which at least plays an important role in at least two of the books, to toxins from expansive fictional universes (e.g. Batman, Star Wars) which might have at most a mention or relatively trivial role in one of many minor stories within the universe.--Special:Contributions/137.122.49.102|137.122.49.102
— [[User talk:137.122.49.102|talk]]), 17:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)