Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakash Institute
Per DGG.  There is no doubt that this article is plagued by promotionalism and when the article was nominated for deletion, suddenly half a dozen SPAs came out of nowhere, but without actually giving any rationale that doesn't fall within .  Even if those issues could be resolved, the article is also redundant with another article already in existence, that already contains the same content.  The subject is not notable enough for its own subject when there is already an article that ''already'' covers the subject.  I wanted to see how the discussion panned out, but I don't see a single keep rationale that addresses this issue.  There's nothing to merge because it's already at the main article, and "running for 20-25 years" is not a reason to keep an article.  A slight notability does not warrant an entirely separate and redundant article when the content already exists on Wikipedia, so it's not like the removal of this article is removing anything from Wikipedia that isn't at the main article for the subject
— User:SudoGhost, 05:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATA (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)