Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Still Hacking Anyway
The page says frequency: quadrennial; therefore, I think that a label of  is flat-out wrong here. This isn't a single event that creates a lasting cultural impression/significance. This is essentially a convention that happens every four years, not an event that caused a lasting effect (which imo should be seen in the secondary sources). Other than that, I think there is a weak showing of  through the Dutch sources: https://www.omroepflevoland.nl/nieuws/149972/zeewolde-scoutingterrein-tijdelijk-paradijs-voor-hackers omroep, https://tweakers.net/geek/128035/teslas-hacken-en-datenklos-op-hackerkamp-sha2017.html tweakers1, https://tweakers.net/geek/125999/pgp-bedenker-phil-zimmermann-spreekt-op-nederlands-hackercamp-sha2017.html tweakers2. Based on those (thin) sources, I reluctantly give a soft keep
— User:Ikjbagl, 08:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LASTING||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)