Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire (strategy game)
as failing  with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources. From sources given, both http://empire-game.org/wp-content/uploads/Empire-Builders-article-sm.jpg and http://cdm.reed.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/reedhisttxt&CISOPTR=16311&REC=7 are not independent, http://www.ag.ru/games/empire-wargame-of-the-century/cheats/3251/http://www.wolfpackempire.com/1978infofile.txt (same thing) is derivative project and  and would only serve as extra sourcing rather than main sourcing for GNG. Interview https://web.archive.org/web/20130208063758/http://www.reed.edu/alumni/oral_hist_intro.html (article links same page twice), while great for development history and insight, is not independent. As we focus on |real-world perspective, such as reception, there isn't enough content for a stand-alone article. I cannot find any more sources, though the title is really hard to search by. Since the game is unlikely to receive further coverage at this point, I don't see much point in userfy-ing unless the editors believe there are more sources somewhere. —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 16:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:WAF (Wikipedia:Notability)