Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pearce (philosopher) (3rd nomination)
improve the sourcing. Doesn't appear to pass  as his "science" doesn't meet the criteria, but passes GNG with significant coverage in the media. Moreover, he has been a subject of multiple third party analysis, so the article should stay
— User:Aleksa, 09:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMICS (Wikipedia:Notability)