Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deletionist versus Inclusionist Controversy
Many of those who have voted expressed their opinions above seem very familiar with many Wikipedia policies, such as , ,  etc.  I, however, very much urge everyone to step back, for a second, and just think about what this project is all about. It is about creating an '''encyclopedia of general knowledge'''.  Yes, we do have rules and guidelines about what should be included and what should not.  That does not mean that one shouldn't excercise one's common sense, at least once in a while.  And the common sense clearly tells that the internal workings of the project, including the internal controversies, are just not important enough (or not "encyclopedic enough", or not "notable enough", whichever phrase you prefer) to be inflicted onto our audience.  So, I urge everybody to consider: it this really notable?  Or do you think this is notable only because you yourself are involved with Wikipedia?  Would someone who is not involved with Wikipedia really think that this is a subject that is worthy to be included in a general-knowledge encyclopedia?  I believe that the answer to all these question is "no
— User:Ekjon, 22:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Verifiability)