Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilkins Lumber
Good point that some sources may be offline (perhaps even likely) due to the age of this company. But the sources you've highlighted above do not meet the criteria for establishing notability. There's a higher standard for notability-establishing sources than for other sources that may be used within an article to support facts, etc. We need to see two sources that talk about the sawmills in an in-depth manner () and contain independent content (). Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. In my opinion, those sources do not meet this standard
— User:HighKing, 10:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)