Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BFL CANADA
per , without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when it can be sourced ''properly''. As written, this does indeed have some advertorial/PR shades to it (not blatant enough to warrant ''speedy'', but definitely still present), and it's sourced almost entirely to |primary sources, such as the websites of other organizations with which it has a direct affiliation and  ''paid-inclusion'' notices of executive staffing appointments in the business-section equivalent of the classified advertising|classifieds, with virtually no evidence of any real |reliable source coverage about it in the ''journalism'' sections of newspapers or magazines. That's ''not'' the kind of sourcing it takes to get a company over  ''regardless'' of how notable it may be in theory
— User:Bearcat, 16:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:ROUTINE||WP:RS||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)