Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whers
and continue to improve as some editors have done since nomination or at worst redirect with edit history intact per  and  so that a basis is preserved should additional sources become available.  Dori has already demonstrated above that Whers are |verifiable in |published books.  As such, we know it is not a hoax, something just made up, and certainly not libelous, but rather part of a series of many books that have a readership far beyond those commenting in this discussion.  Thus, as our project strives to cover human knowledge and serve our readers rather than ourselves (and clearly http://stats.grok.se/en/200905/Whers some of our readers are interested in coming here for this information), we would be doing a disservice by outright redlinking per
— User:T, 16:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)