Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mix FM (Ottawa)
in addition to my keep vote above: If suppressing sources (that name the child) would cause the article to dip below  threshold for notability, then the sources should be left in, at least to the extent necessary to meet the same Wikipedia guidelines the article would have met otherwise.  The same goes for any other local speech laws that end up having a domino effect on applying Wikipedia guidelines.  It is one thing to give courtesy deference to local privacy laws in an article about that place, when it doesn't endanger content's ability to meet Wikipedia guidelines; it is another, and quite unacceptable, to allow local laws to insert alterations in the application of Wikipedia policy (erifiability/eliable sources/otability) to its own content, and as a result, for example, effect the deletion of the subject itself from Wikipedia when it would not have happened otherwise.  In short: Canadian law should not be allowed to push a Wikipedia article into failing  or any other Wikipedia policy
— User:Closeapple, 10:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:V||WP:R||WP:N||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)