Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's influence on style and fashion
Sweet jesus on a pogo stick, we're here ''again''? As noted by others, the "arms" article was already deleted via AfD. Despite the title and ''slightly'' expanded topic area to style, the bulk of the article still centers around the the lady's pecs biceps. Where this falls short in the |notability guidelines is the "...presumed to satisfy" aspect of it. It appears from past discussion on the main Michelle Obama page as well as in the prior AfD that the subject matter is simply not appropriate for a standalone article. Its just...fluff, like the kind of off-beat story that what's-her-name on CNN does about potato chip pantsuits and other silly season junk. Not everything mentioned by the media is instantly article-worthy, and via the 5th bullet point of the "General notability guideline", editors have the support they need to decide, by consensus, that some reliably-sourced events are just too dumb and too irrelevant to warrant an article
— User:Tarc, 15:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)