Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Akin rape and pregnancy controversy
Editors quoting "WPNOTNEWS" might re-read . Todd Akin went from little-known outside his state to international news overnight, generating more coverage in two days than he's likely had in his career to date. I can only assume the editors who argue this will have no significant follow-up coverage after today are joking--people still write about George Allen's Macaca (term)|macaca incident in 2000, and this is that turned up to eleven. To give a tiny example of the sort of detailed coverage this is receiving, check out this supplementary piece in the UK newspaper The Guardian explaining the origins of rape-pregnancy myths.http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-h-word/2012/aug/20/legitimate-rape-medieval-medical-concept Attempting to summarize all this coverage (and the coming further coverage) in Todd Akin's article is impractical and would create a serious imbalance, making this  the best option. Wikipedia shouldn't have to wait four years to cover this in a substantive way
— User:Khazar2, 12:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RAPID||WP:SPINOFF (Wikipedia:Notability)