Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scene Generator
per references.  The article iswas not in the greatest state.  However the nominator has previously PROD'd and item that had already been PROD'd ignoring the talk page and has now misleading introduced a URL to this nomination which has noting to do with the article.  (It does have a little to do with Mockup and a hatnote at the top of the article would not go amiss but it is not a perfect match and might require a tweak to the target which is why I didn't immediately do it).  This usage is more in like with Physics which is why I added that to the Physics WikiProject a while ago.  So I am concerned the nom. has not fully understood the article to be tackling it.  But it is currently a mess.  I think I waybacked one fairly good reference earlier today but haven't had time to apply it.  Yup probably  the nom. but the article does need improved citations and disambiguating from the URL given by the nom
— User:Djm, 15:42, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TROUT (Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout)