Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikas Kedia
As we have several first-time editors here, it might be useful to point out that ''|notability'' is a term of art here with a significantly different meaning than the usual sense of the word.  Quoting from :''Generally, a person who is "part of the enduring historical record" will have been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books on that field, by historians. A politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists. An actor who has been featured in magazines has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple magazine feature articles, by magazine article writers. An actor or TV personality who has "an independent biography" has been written about, in depth, in a book, by an independent biographer.''  Yes, the subject of this article has been mentioned in a handful of publications, and I'm happy to stipulate that he's a good person doing useful work.  However, as none of his companies have wikipedia articles (due to their lack of notability) and he himself has not garnered ''significant'' coverage, I still don't consider him notable ''in the wikipedia sense''.  I'd be happy to reconsider given an argument based on our notability guidelines
— User:Lesser, 13:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY||WP:ANYBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)