Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madis Eek
There is also a very indepth, three page article about Eek specifically in the September 2010 ''Oma Maja'' edition of ''Äripäev'' (pages 16&ndash;19, https://static-pdf.aripaev.ee/XjH653_dwk-5kyJoXM5aFjomTzU.pdf here). Also, disagree with a few of your assessments. The https://epl.delfi.ee/artikkel/64924046/elanikud-protesteerivad-kultuurikula-rajamise-vastu ''Eesti Päevaleht'' article:  can't be used, as the subject is the co-architect. The subject didn't "inherit" notabilty from someone else's sole abilities; the subject ''is'' the ''co-creator'' of the building. The https://www.err.ee/924038/pealtnagija-arhitektid-avastasid-riigihangete-e-lahenduses-tobeda-vea Eesti Rahvusringhääling article: the article is indepth. The fact that it quotes the subject in small "bits of interviews"...well, it would be sort of remiss as a journalistic piece if it didn't. Not sure how that is a strike against it. Agree that several sources are passing mentions, but they are mostly about his work or buildings
— User:ExRat, 14:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)