Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewardship economy
On first pass, given the placement in the economic footer and reading it, it sounded like an easy keep.  Upon closer examination, I could find only one real source for this: A single book by one author.  Given that is is being shown as an important economic model, I would think there would be one reference on Google News, World Cat, National Library of Australia, National Library of Australia, the US Library of Congress, Newsbank, Google Books, the University of Canberra catalog, The Economist website, the Chicago Tribune.  I just could not find anything there to support this being an economy type of any note.  Reading the text and absent any other reliable sources based on independent search, it appears to border on Wikipedia:Fringe theories. Of the sources listed by EllenCT, the first is trivial, the second references "product stewardship economy" and is unclear if it is the same topic (and also trivial), Sustaining the earth source is also trivial, the next source has more details but is also about  "product stewardship economy" which never appears in the article, Report - Water Resources Center, University of California, Issues 77-84 is a trivial mention to a resource stewardship economy and is trivial, the next reference is also trivial, and the same for the last. Not the same names and trivial.  Does not establish  and shows major problems with  for this article
— User:LauraHale, 04:34, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)