Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bird in a Cage
and expand.  When a film wins an Academy Award,http://www.oscars.org/awards/saa/winners/winners.pdf page 24 it's notable per "|''The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking''"... even if |the event happened 25 years ago.  That Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences chooses to recognize the work of young filmmakers |does not make that recognition somehow dismissable because the filmmaker is 25 years older.  As far better sources exist beyond the one impuned by the nominator,http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Bird+in+a+Cage%22+%22Zarro%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a we have a guideline encouraged reason |to expand the article and add them, not delete it because it |has not been done yet... nor is it a reason to argue that |because a different film does not (yet) have an article, this film should not either
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 21:41, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:NTEMP||WP:NTEMP||WP:ATD||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:WAX (Wikipedia:Notability)