Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity St. Clair
per Morbidthoughts and Cavarrone, two editors who i have had disagreements with in the past, but who I acknowledge to be perhaps the only WP users who have demonstrated that they are neither anti-porn nor pro-porn, but reasonable and unbiased. St. Clair does indeed pass the GNG, a guideline which is held in high regard on WP and has even been used as an excuse to depreciate PORNBIO. Several users masking their  by citing  among other excuses have actually managed to get articles on porn stars who pass the GNG deleted as well (e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luscious Lopez|Luscious Lopez & Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love twins|The Love twins). WP's thriving anti-porn movement continues to be the elephant in the room. The recent Wikipedia:Overzealous deletion|mass deletions/PROD's/AfD's of porn biographies are proof of it. As mentioned above, this discussion has been taken to BLP/N, possibly out of fear for the projected "keep" or "no consensus" outcome
— User:Rebecca1990, 16:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)