Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter John
Oakshade argues, passionately and accurately, that the GNG trumps the subject's failure to meet the criteria of .  Indeed it does, but I'm missing the part where there's a single |reliable source discussing Mr. John in "significant detail," as the GNG requires.  Google News UK returns a dozen hits for the past year from the ''Southwark News'' (which its own website claims to be a borough weekly with a circulation of 9,660), each and every one of them a quote about some local political issue or another, but none ''about'' Mr. John
— User:Ravenswing, 09:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POLITICIAN||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)