Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: Enterprise alleged continuity problems (third nomination)
quite blatantly |original research and . The fact that it is reasonably well-written and is formatted properly, and has obviously had a lot of work put into it, does not change the fact that it is clearly unsuitable for Wikipedia. This won't stop mass voting by Trekkers stalemating it into a no consensus... as usual. (oops, no-one's supposed to admit that AFD is actually still a vote tally done by the closing admin are they? It is officially a 'discussion' now, isn't it
— User:Motor, 16:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:No original research)