Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Prozialeck
I can't find any solid RS on this BLP from a proper source outside of minor online sites (of which he is rarely the principal subject).  I definately can't find  which I think is important for a BLP – there is no material article on this subject (and where he is the subject) from a full WP:RS? I am struggling to see the basis on which this BLP can avoid deletion? It would help if the Keeps could present an RS that would be SIGCOV on him, but none have been presented so far. Otherwise we fall into the unsustainable situation where his WP BLP is the main source of his notability (it is meant to be the other way around
— User:Britishfinance, 16:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)