Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nucular (2nd nomination)
I don't see, really, what part of  this falls afoul of.  I can only see potential issues with #DICT and , and given that the article goes beyond the level of a simple definition and establishes notability for the subject (with two notable sources quoted directly in the body of the article), I don't think that it has particular problems with either.  It needs some clean-up to fit the style of the wiki, but other than that, I think that this is a legitimately encyclopedic (if odd) topic and an attempt to tackle it.  Article was also rescued after a previous AfD, with the Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_July_10|Deletion Review Log here.  Reasons given there are pretty good for maintaining the article on this wiki
— User:Chri, 20:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:DISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)