Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tensor of a quaternion
and do not merge.  Appears to me to be original research, making an obscure argument about semantics based on original sources that do not directly address the argument it makes (and cannot, because the argument seems to be about concepts that were deveoped ''after'' the sources it references), i.e. |original synthesis.  Also self-contradictory: 'Hamilton did not ... define a tensor to be "a signless number" ... Hamilton defined the new word ''tensor'' as a ... signless number
— User:JulesH, 17:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)