Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fr. Chico Monteiro
given the self-serving nature of your own article, I thought it might be worth checking your other contributions.  I found a lot of link-spam and a few more self-serving articles.  Seriously - you think an award you made up yourself is worthy of an article?  The piont here is that it appears you don't understand our policies regarding a subject's notability.  As for removing links, when the relevant links are all from your website, then yes, they fail our |reliable sources test and I removed them as I would remove any link-spam.  If Time magazine has an article on this fellow, then by all means, add a reference to this article.  Keep in mind, however, that we don't write articles on a subject just because Time magazine did.  When a subject is notable, it isn't difficult for experts on that subject to find some really great sources.  You, the expert, appear to have primarily yourself as a source.  This gives us a strong indication that the subject isn't notable ''according to our standards.''  If this should change in the future, that's great.  We'll still be here, and if necessary, we have a deletion review process
— User:Rklawton, 04:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)