Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinyoung Englund
Every'' candidate in ''any'' election is ''always'' going to garner some degree of coverage, because covering elections is a big part of what the media is ''for'', but candidates are not automatically deemed notable just because that coverage exists — candidacy-related coverage is |run of the mill for election candidates, because it's simply ''expected'' to exist for ''any'' person who's running as a candidate whether she has a substantive and enduring notability claim or not. What we've got here, however, is almost entirely a mix of routine and almost exclusively local candidacy-related coverage of exactly the type and volume that matches what's ''expected'', |primary sources that cannot assist notability at all, and glancing namechecks of her existence in references that aren't substantively ''about'' her. The only source here that ''actually'' establishes any real notability at all, by passing all three of the "substantively ''about'' her", "from a reliable source" and "not just about her candidacy" tests, is the ''Korea Times'' article — but ''one'' source doesn't singlehandedly confer a  pass all by itself. So no prejudice against recreation on or after election day if she ''wins'' the seat, but nothing here constitutes a compelling reason why she would already qualify for an article today
— User:Bearcat, 21:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MILL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill)