Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural History of South Asia mailing list (2nd nomination)
As pointed in comments above. If prediction of an earthquake on the list, report of a new species, references to the list on journals and newsletters and newspapers is not enough for notability, fine with me. And if mentions in a Linux book and a few reports of questionable authority can make LKLM notable, then this is just a case of  /. And using popularity/google hits as notability will always work when it comes to web or software related material. Finally, I would like to see administrators help in defining or refining policy and not merely use policy citations to win debates
— User:Shyamal, 05:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IDONTLIKE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)