Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional journalists (2nd nomination)
As far as I understand a list is justified on Wikipedia either as a sensible grouping of topics that are treated somewhere on Wikipedia (or have secondary sources), or because the topic, in this case fictional journalists, itself is notable. I feel the nomination does not make clear on both points why this should not be the case here. I think, especially as this is a second nomination, that |"I feel it isn't encyclopedic" does not carry any weight as long as it is not supported by more arguments. Sure, this list can be improved, e.g. by citations (though by its nature, the entries themselves already give primary sourcing), but that |is not a reason for deletion
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)