Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autumn Phillips
per Nfitz and just as her being a part of the British royal family. I also want to point out that in , which a few used as an argument for deletion, has one example about marriage -- and it's used to show as a reason ''not'' to use for deletion. It even goes on to say about not inherited: "Note, however, that this does not apply to situations where the fact of having a relationship to another person inherently defines a public position that is notable in its own right, such as a national First Lady." I personally think being a part of the British royal family does denote a public position, but I'm sure some might disagree. Either way, it's just an additional thought, since the new sources added pass 
— User:Whisperjanes, 02:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)