Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Gallagher
Citation counts not enough to convince me of a pass of #C1. Nothing relevant found in Google news archive. No other evidence of significance apparent in the article. "Psychoprosthetics" and "Enabling Technologies" are both reliably published books, but they're edited volumes rather than monographs so they don't really do anything to demonstrate the impact of her research. Unless something else turns up during the AfD, this looks like a failure of both  and  to me
— User:David, 01:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)