Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V language (2nd nomination)
The only 3rd party source is a newspaper, and it's not a |reliable source in this context. Besides the general idea, the Wikipedia article is mostly vaporware, and so is the newspaper article. I cannot find any discussion in specialized press. It's easy for journalists to get excited about stuff they don't understand. For comparison purposes, look at the article for NimbleX: surely it was covered by the mainstream press in its country of origin, but the Wikipedia article is not based on that coverage (which is only mentioned), but rater on the articles that appeared in the specialized press, because the latter actually involve some critical thinking. No objections to recreating this article when there's some coverage that allows a substantive presentation. Besides, the software is in pre-alpha stage. Right now #NEWS applies: a single blip in a newspaper does not make a Wikipedia article
— User:VasileGaburici, 18:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)