Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wealth Tech
The article is so lightly paraphrased from the two references that it's arguably a copyvio ("Fintech companies that provide alternative solutions to incumbent wealth management companies" versus "fintech companies that offer an alternative to traditional wealth management firms", etc.). Even setting that aside, the first reference is mostly a long quote from somebody's LinkedIn post, and the preface to that quote says "Ah, a new word is born" &mdash; i.e., |a neologism. A news search finds a smattering of results for the past few months, but not enough, IMO, to indicate that the term itself deserves an article. Plenty of news and general hits are false positives, too; e.g., "as they have grown in wealth, tech firms have..." (By way of comparison, the financial technology article is pretty dreadful, but its presence is more justifiable. A redirect to financial technology ''might'' be warranted, but there isn't any content in the Wealth Tech page worth merging
— User:XOR, 17:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEOLOGISM (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)