Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominique Strauss-Kahn sexual assault case
Any problems with neutrality can be fixed through editing. It is true that Strauss-Kahn is innocent until proven guilty, and that his trial has yet to occur. However, that does not change the historical importance of the scandal, particularly in the context of French politics. Coverage of this case thus far has been in-depth and persistent;  is met here. The article does indeed need to be heavily patrolled to ensure compliance with , , and . However, that's not by itself a reason for deletion. Although Strauss-Kahn's alleged crimes are obviously more violent than perjury and obstruction of justice, I think a parallel with Bill Clinton is fair here. If Wikipedia was around in the late '90s, some of those advocating deletion here might have voted to delete the Lewinsky scandal article because of BLP concerns. I would have objected just as strenuously
— User:A, 18:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:EVENT||WP:BLP||WP:V||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)