Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Modelo
The article was nominated for speedy deletion under , which certainly doesn't apply now, and under  (advertising), which also doesn't seem to apply.  The restaurant has received positive reviews, which we can report faithfully without our article constituting advertising.  For example, the phrase “critically acclaimed tamales” in the article may seem promotional, but it seems to be an accurate report, as that one sentence cites four sources, the first one of which says “In New Mexico, perhaps no one makes tamales as revered as El Modelo”.Erasing the template is not the preferred way to contest speedy deletion, but I don't believe it's sufficient cause to bring the article to AfD.  The article now may be of modest size, but it's well structured, and well sourced, citing reputable sources such as ''USA Today'' (more than once) and ''Travel + Leisure''.  There are no obvious problems, and while there may always be subtle issues which aren't obvious, there's nothing so wrong with the article that it can never be fixed and must be deleted.Finally, the article is not yet 24 hours old.  It's off to a good start.  We should keep it.&nbsp
— User:Unician, 16:30, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A7||WP:G11 (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)