Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 DCC market fire
Ping group|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 DCC market fire|Discussion of 2017 DCC market fire|LibStar|Sangdeboeuf|Noyster|Ibrahim Husain Meraj}} It's great that four editors have participated, and good points have been made by all, but there hasn't been any discussion beyond staking out our positions. None of the participants so far think it should have been created or currently works as a stand alone article, so is there a disposition we can agree on that avoids it being kept as "no consensus"? An IP has, in effect, done what Noyster suggested, by adding a sentence to Gulshan Thana citing the article's three sources.{{diff|Gulshan Thana|764286663}} I'd be willing to change my recommendation to '''merge and redirect''' if that would help settle this. What do you say? Redirects are cheap, if down the road sufficient analysis is published to warrant an article, the redirect could be turned back into one, and it's in line with the subsections of policy 
— User:Worldbruce, 05:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)