Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judaization of Jerusalem
Definitely not : http://books.google.ca/books?q=%22judaization+of+jerusalem%22&um=1&as_brr=0 360 google book hits for "Judaization of Jerusalem", http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&q=%22judaisation%20of%20jerusalem%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp 72 google book hits for "Judaisation of Jerusalem", http://books.google.ca/books?um=1&q=%22judaizing+jerusalem%22&btnG=Search+Books 91 hits for "Judaizing Jerusalem" and  http://books.google.ca/books?um=1&as_brr=0&q=%22judaising+jerusalem%22&btnG=Search+Books 18 hits for "Judaising Jerusalem". While there may be some SYNTH in the article as currently constructed (not sure, but I am assuming good faith regarding Nudve's claim in the nomination), the topic itself is notable in its own right and a subject of scholarly discussion. It is also not a POVFORK, since while it discusses a process and policy arguably related to the articles Nudve lists, it is as evidenced above, a subject in its own right. Controversy over the use of the term can be discussed in the article itself. Those concerned by a lack of balance are encouraged to add the views of those who take issue with the term to the article itself, rather than lobbying for its deletion
— User:Tiamut, 16:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)