Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stev´nn Hall
This is far too dependent on |blogs and |primary sources, and not nearly enough on |reliable sources, to deem him notable — but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to ''exempt'' him from having to be sourced much better than this. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do much better than this
— User:Bearcat, 17:10, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLOGS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)