Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Teo
One single |independent, third party reliable source, in which "substantial coverage" may be debatable. Unfortunately, that's not enough to pass the bar and meet our |inclusion criteriae. Most of the article's content cannot be sourced back to other |reliable sources, and is therefore |unverifiable. Regarding the original editors' assertion that Rome wasn't built in one day, this is correct, but do also note that by Wikipedia's standards, Romulus and Remus would have had to wait until Rome itself became noted enough to get their own article. Joel Teo may become noted enough to warrant an article in the future, but at present, that is not yet the case
— User:MLauba, 08:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)