Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decoloniality
Several people above have cited , which is an important policy. So, let's look at what it says. "To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources, such as books and papers, say ''about'' the term or concept, not books and papers ''that use'' the term. ... Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources are not yet ready for use and coverage in Wikipedia. ... when secondary sources become available, it will be appropriate to create an article on the topic, or use the term within other articles." The key point being made (which really just comes back to  and ) is that we need reliable secondary sources "such as books and papers" that are ''about'' the term before it can be covered. I count 14 academic papers above that are about the term, and more are already given in the article. As  says, "when secondary sources become available, it will be appropriate to create an article on the topic". Those secondary sources are available and given
— User:Bondegezou, 10:40, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:V||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)