Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NKosi Ntsikayezwe Sigcau
It's long established that https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=AFD%20is%20not%20clean%20up&fulltext=Search&profile=all AFD is not clean up, so being "undersourced and non-neutral" are not valid reasons for deletion and, contrary to what the nominator says in a reply above, yes, it is clear from the WP:AFD page that people nominating any page for deletion should go through the preliminaries outline at  ("if there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources....The minimum search expected is a Google Books search and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects. Such searches should in most cases take only a minute or two to perform.") as otherwise we run the risk of losing valid content. Besides meeting , the subject receives coverage http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qczCAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA52&lpg=PA52&dq=Ntsikayezwe+Sigcau.&source=bl&ots=wsyIUXgdbn&sig=Hq9YkfL5Ws3_qtvuQOwPZKlbGAE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=OPWEVLDwOYe-PKrfgHg&ved=0CFcQ6AEwDA#v=onepage&q=Ntsikayezwe%20Sigcau.&f=false here, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xwyzVMQXQFcC&pg=PA139&lpg=PA139&dq=Ntsikayezwe+Sigcau.&source=bl&ots=1KaUNAmnTP&sig=U5rWUG2DHQNVRHcEnA7724yradk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=OPWEVLDwOYe-PKrfgHg&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Ntsikayezwe%20Sigcau.&f=false here, and http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=oEgnAQAAIAAJ&q=Ntsikayezwe+Sigcau.&dq=Ntsikayezwe+Sigcau.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mPqEVLGLG4fiO9rXgZgF&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAw here
— User:Valenciano, 01:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:POLITICIAN (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)