Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaim Rabinowitz
The nominator of this AfD User {{user|Rms125a@hotmail.com}} has been in constant violation of Wikipedia:Username policy#Internet addresses a most basic rule of WP. He has pleaded and claimed that he is "exempt" from this rule, thus, there is the utterly absurd anomaly that this nominator takes for himself the "right" to break current WP policies with his own self-justifications and twisted arguments, while at the same time he seeks to impose WP policies, as in this AfD, on articles and users. Um, isn't that what is called hypocrisy in English? He will claim that he has a "papal dispensation" from admins someplace to be in violation of rules that all Wikipedians must adhere to once those rules come into effect. For example, '''no one on WP (not even User {{user|Jimbo Wales}}) would be allowed to cite the easier standards for including articles when WP first started years ago''', so why should a user be allowed to be in violation of ''current'' policies and guidelines and have the self-appointed "right" to impose stricter rules and guidelines on articles |he does not like and other users who refute his POV as in this AfD? Therefore: '''Until such time as User {{user|Rms125a@hotmail.com}} rectifies his own user name and behavior that is presently in flagrant violation of WP policy, he should withdraw this AfD, in addition to which he should also be censured until such time that he changes his name and follows the rules as they exist and apply to everyone at this time and not the way things were ten or five years ago.''' Thank you
— User:IZAK, 05:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)