Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bart Tanski (3rd nomination)
no new arguments for deletion have been introduced, except "the news articles are old" -- but notability is not temporary.  I maintain that the subject has achieved notability for the reasons I outlined the last time we had this discussion.  Barring any reason given to change position, I still say it's a keeper, espeically with the buzz created from his college playing which is more than enough to pass  even if  is not met
— User:Paulmcdonald, 21:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE (Wikipedia:Notability)