Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Ding
This is a really hard one to analyse on  grounds. Per , he is mentioned in several different papers, and is the lead on one or two of them with a bunch of citations. He's been name dropped in a bunch of different articles. He fails . The article is so badly source-bombed and promotional that it's difficult to understand what exactly he's notable for, or how he would pass . I have no comment either way apart from the fact this at the very least needs , if not deletion
— User:SportingFlyer, 01:43, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:NPOL||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Notability)