Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Renard (4th nomination)
for lack of  in .  Reynard's books and films are not notable, making it hard to argue that he passes  #3. or 4.  He fails  #.2 because sole claim to notability is writing ''"books' stated purpose is to reawaken interest in and clarify the core principles of the 1976 spiritual text A Course In Miracles"''  And also because the books are not notable (I.e., not widely reviewed, cited, or discussed in .)  That leaves  #.1 :"The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors."  And here we have to face the fact that despite the fact that the article has been here since 2005 and this is the 5th AfD, none of the editors arguing for keeping have been able to bring sources that would establish this point.  The books cited in the article are within the A Course In Miracles thought tradition (a small, walled garden) and are not notable books.  Nor do they appear to give  to Reynard's work.  Nor, for that matter, does any source I can find.  The items that come up on a news archive search (Proquest) are primarily press releases and event listing talks in local events columns.  I can find nothing that approached  in a soruce independent of Reynard and A Course In Miracles.  Nor can I find anything resembling a published profile of him.  Topic fails 
— User:E, 15:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR||WP:RS||WP:AUTHOR||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)