Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smarandache-Wellin number
It's true that not everything that ends up in the OEIS might be encyclopaedic (although I can't say with certainy either way), but I think that these definitely are. They're mentioned in a mathematical textbook, they're listed at Weisstein's site (Mathworld), and they're discussed on other websites; of course they're not as important a concept as, say, Hilbert spaces, but the claim that the concept is "non-notable and mathematically trivial" is simply and obviously wrong. Furthermore, I think we'd do well to keep in mind that #PAPER|Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopaedia: we can afford to have entries even on relatively obscure topics, so long as they're important in *some* way, and these certainly are
— User:Schneelocke, 13:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)