Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Shames
per nomination. Verifiability alone is not enough to guarantee an article, and the GNG is not a right to inclusion, as  makes clear. We have to use common sense and discern what coverage is substantial and what isn't, and that includes looking at what the coverage is about. Since the subject did nothing in his life that is noteworthy, and the biggest coverage is because of the book/miniseries, it is reasonable for us to discount the other sourcing as routine or being about the company as a whole. The one line keep arguments here are pretty weak, as is the assertion that passing  is enough to have an article. On the weight of the policies and guidelines, this article should not exist, and I'd encourage the next person looking at this to close to look past the nose count and at the very least consider another relist
— User:TonyBallioni, 14:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)