Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissociative identity disorder in popular culture
The TOPIC is clearly notable.  The topic, as a category that notable sources like to list things, has been demonstrated above to be notable.  If the article sucks right now, well, a good starting point would be to blank it and start over with the references linked above... but note I say BLANK and start over, not DELETE () and start over, specifically because I think the history of the page would be valuable to future editors trying to expand the list. ''However'', I'm not convinced that the list really sucks that much right now.  Okay, sure, it doesn't use enough secondary sources, but if the work of fiction itself uses the words "Dissociative Identity Disorder", I think that would just barely be enough for our primary source criteria (that you don't synthesize or reinterpret what the primary source says).  And I highly suspect that most, if not all, of these items on the list meet that criteria.  Sure, secondary sources are always preferred, but there is allowance for primary sources in certain circumstances
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)