Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutan Naidu
Nothing stated here passes , this is formatted like a résumé (with weird digressions into poetry) rather than an encyclopedia article, and there's no evidence that he passes  — once I stripped all the invalid  "references" to other Wikipedia articles, all that was left was a |primary source candidate financial report, of the type that doesn't demonstrate a candidate as notable because ''every'' candidate has to file one, and a single news article which glancingly namechecks his existence without being ''about'' him in any substantive or non-trivial way. As well, there's possibly a  of some kind here, as the creator's username suggests that they may be the same person as the author of the news article — so even if he has no personal connection to Naidu beyond admiring him, the "self-citing your own work" problem would still pertain. As always, Wikipedia is |not a free alternative to LinkedIn on which a person is entitled to have an article just because he exists — to get an article on here, a person has to satisfy our notability standards. But there's no evidence whatsoever that Naidu does, and even if he did this article is written ''so'' awfully that the "blow it up and start over from scratch" treatment would still apply
— User:Bearcat, 17:32, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:CIRCULAR||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:COI||WP:NOTLINKEDIN (Wikipedia:Notability)