Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Democratic Party of Russia (2nd nomination)
The concern with the first AfD was with  for a moment, but unless you are to consider the party a product it was clear that no speculation was being made and that the announcement to form the party was serious, so it was treated as such by the media. If it is somehow clear now that it won't happen then crystal is definitely not an issue, and it is only required to source that fact to seal the content. Notability was clearly established by consensus last time, and it is not temporary. I think the nom has a valid concern regarding that content is to meet significance, and on that I agree with Carrite's position. The subject is of a matter that the encyclopaedia actively seeks since that's it's purpose in the first place
— User:Patitomr, 00:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)