Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of human diseases associated with infectious pathogens
to the infectious diseases list or '''Repurpose.'''  There are also some serious cleanup issues here, with a lot of this based on "primary" sources (i.e. research results, not |review articles), and honestly it appears like there are rampant problems with .  I'm looking at the article ''as a list'', not the caveats and article at the top, because it claims to be a list, not an article.  The whole "associated with" and the problem of cum hoc ergo propter hoc|"post" hoc fallacies means that this article and list could be ''very, very easily misunderstood''.  A list of pathogens "associated with" diseases might be useful (this content is already sort of there in this article), with the heavy caveat through formatting of specifically having an "associated with" and "proved to cause" distinction.  There are some major gaps in the content, as there are all sorts of infections are "associated with" HIV (e.g. HHV-8, T. pallidum) and aren't listed here, so this list comes across as "infections that might cause disease" and I have a healthy wariness towards speculative content.  One possibility is simply to retitle the article and have an article on infectious agents (pathogen implies that it causes disease, which is not known for some of these bugs) associated with disease and have a bunch of examples rather than having a list
— User:SDY, 23:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:MEDRS||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)