Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emochila (2nd nomination)
Frankly, I don't believe that both stay or both go.  One can be notable while the other is not.  And I would certainly express my opinion if that were the case.  Fairness is not relevant.  If a firm's clients are stupid enough to think that a WP article is significant in choosing a supplier, then they should lose their CPA licenses.  And you can print that in the Technology Review.  That said, neither firm can demonstrate that they are notable.  The references offer nothing in this regard.  Republished press releases are meaningless and fail .  A small blurb in an obscure trade publication would be something if it were accompanied by other independent sources.  Its not.  I looked through Google News for all dates and found one mention of E Mochila.  The CPA Technology Review. That doesn't cut it
— User:TastyPoutine, 01:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)