Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Hungarian sentiment (2nd nomination)
My biggest issue is the nomination stating that the article was recreated using the exact same text as the reviously deleted article. The articles current history does show a degree of evolution. I am not fully convinced that argument is indeed correct. Can an admin who can view deletion history verify this???., That aside as it does not fully impact the current discussion (just may add a bit of perspective to the discussion) as we look at the article today not yesterday anyway. One primary motivation for deletion last time was that the article was full of synthesis and original research. Is that an issue today? This article is referenced albiet these references should be improved. This is mainly due to the article being extremelely POV (borderline still a synth issue, but limited in its OR in my belief) on the selectioning of events discussed. I dont believe the sake of other articles (anti-X) existing should impact this article (See  for further rationale behind this), with this article alone, i do see some oppertunity to improve the article if someone were to take the time, so i would side on a weak keep
— User:Ottawa4ever, 12:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)