Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Densa (3rd nomination)
I haven't read the book, but we seem to have quite a number of sources now&mdash;certainly enough to justify this article. The prose of the article is much better than it was for the past two AfDs, as well (I've just done some  editing, and clarified that the organization is fictional). I've been finding more and more that I'm playing devil's advocate rather than arguing a sturdy position, so I'm changing my vote
— User:CA387, 13:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)