Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Cleverley
Both comments you make are more likely true than not.  To add to it, I suppose many people here recognize that being a blonde white female means the attention she ''gets'' is far more than the attention she ''deserves''.  It's also true that she's getting talked about much less now that she's found.  That's the nature of all news and events.  But that does not make someone not notable.  Plane crashes are no different - their perceived notability is exaggerated simply because planes fly and people fear that - and they disappear just as quickly from the news.  Yet we have extensive articles not just for plane crashes, but for near misses that harmed nobody! (2007_San_Francisco_International_Airport_runway_incursion|example, 2005_Logan_Airport_runway_incursion|example, 1999_T._F._Green_Airport_runway_incursion|example).  I think we should stick with  the criteria in  for judging notability.   says notability means ''the person has been the subject of published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject''.  If notability were judged on how notable some feel she ''deserves'' to be, then I'd agree, this article should go (and I'd AfD Paris Hilton in the same swoop
— User:Reswobslc, 01:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)