Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz Wilde
Pay-per-view articles aren't really too big of a deal since they refer to newspaper articles that could be verified if necessary.  Many editors seem to think that finding several mentions of the article's subject in newspapers or magazines is sufficient to establish notabilty, it's not.   states that ''substantive coverage in multiple independent reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, of notability'' and ''minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as reliable sources.''   emphasizes this with ''If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability''.  Based on the claims that she is the first and/or only female shock jock, I'm inclined to say she's notable but without reliable 3rd party, non-trivial, sources to back up this claim, it's just a claim.  I added the references that I could locate (the only ones that are there) but they are pretty trivial
— User:Rtphokie, 01:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)