Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socionomics (2nd nomination)
Readers can see for themselves which of the two of us is ranting and violating ; Rgfolsom has repeatedly reverted my edits that corrected his POV-pushing, has lost every time a third opinion was sought, and has already been blocked once for edit-warring as a result.  Rgfolsom's comment misrepresents an arbitration decision, and the comment's concern for precedent is contradicted by the fact that he recreated and is defending an article that was already deleted, despite existing consensus. , but it is certainly not a one-way ratchet
— User:TedFrank, 15:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPA||WP:CCC (Wikipedia:No personal attacks)