Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitGold
The criteria for establishing notability goes beyond whether the *source* is an independent reliable secondary source, but whether the specific article meets the criteria for establishing notability including being intellectually independent expressing opinion/analysis and not reliant on company sources. https://www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2015/may/31/bitgold-new-standard-digital-currency The Guardian article relies almost exclusively on interview/quotation with Crumb, one of the founders and has no independent analysis/opinion. It also follows the format of history/Aha moment/funding/"future is bright" churnalism (a rare find, it has no posed photo) and is really just company marketing masquerading as real journalism. It is not intellectually independent and fails  and/or . http://business.financialpost.com/investing/bitgold-begins-trading-on-tsx-venture-exchange-as-gold-transaction-platform-builds-momentum?__lsa=c93a-82d8 This Financial Post reference (oh look, posed photo!) is another example of churnalism with the same format, etc. It is not intellectually independent, relies on quotations/interview with company sources and fails  and/or 
— User:HighKing, 13:32, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)