Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeFileSync
per nomination. No indication of notability per Wikipedia standards. A supposed CNET.com quotation in the reception section (the ''only'' source cited there) is sourced to a link which leads to a download page - for FreeFileSync along with multiple similar applications. Even if the quoted text appeared there (it doesn't), this would hardly be a legitimate third-party review, since websites offering things for download are inevitably going to praise them. And a search on the web finds little commentary but blogs, and comparative reviews discussing similar software. The only other commentary on the application seems to revolve around alleged malware content. Lacking meaningful in-depth third-party commentary of the type  mandates, any article can only either be promotional guff, or negative content regarding malware. Neither of which constitute a valid Wikipedia article. Special:Contributions/2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:130:351B:68D3:4C6D|2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:130:351B:68D3:4C6D
— [[User talk:2A00:23C1:8250:6F01:130:351B:68D3:4C6D|talk]]), 07:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)