Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation Jones (3rd nomination)
The nominator doesn't understand the idea of |original research, and neither does RollandWaters. Generation Jones is an idea that's caught on in reliable sources. Trying to suppress it by deleting this page won't work, it would be shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. Argue against the concept and rant against Pontell all you like elsewhere, but don't bring that agenda here. This argument to delete is plain old . If there is criticism of the idea of Generation Jones in reliable sources (and "Savvy Boomer" isn't that), then include them in the article
— User:Fences, 23:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:No original research)