Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shock sites (fourth nomination)
While I am willing to |assume good faith in the nomination, I think that these issues have been discussed and settled several times in the past, including a very recent AfD, and that nothing new has really been brought up. (I'm also somewhat uncomfortable with the nominator "cherry-picking" some votes from the previous AfD as examples.) As a substantive matter, I believe the content to have encyclopedic value in showing examples of a notable Internet phenomenon that is followed by a large audience. As with any article, specific items of content that are inappropriate can (and will be) removed, and/or replaced by better content. I think this should be speedily closed as '''keep''' and further time, energy, and emotion be spared the participants in AfD
— User:MCB, 17:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)