Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilpazier Aslam
KazakhPol may be abusing , if there's stronger proof of this, I may vote for a procedural keep. As for the article itself - a blogstorm in a teacup over a trainee journalist. Wikipedia is not a news report archive or an archive for recording blogosphere story-of-the-weeks
— User:Bwithh, 22:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)