Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of iOS e-book reader software
I see no unfixable problems raised by the nominator nor evident from the article itself, and no problem with having such a comparison article in general. Any NOTCATALOG issues (if there are any; I think it's a stretch to liken this to a product catalog) could be fixed by removing non-notable products (though that is not always necessary so long as there is some secondary source coverage, even if that coverage falls short of meriting the product an article) or removing prices (though comparing free and non-free may also be relevant, and even prices sometimes get commented on in secondary source coverage). That's all for editors to hash out through normal processes, not a deletion concern at all (as is true of most claimed NOT violations I have seen). Finally, the nominator's concern about editors using it to "add credibility" to a particular product is an unpersuasive -type claim, again fixable by NPOV monitoring and editing
— User:Postdlf, 17:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SUSCEPTIBLE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)