Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Directive Communication
I read the article. I read the response on the talk page where the person who had never before contributed compared us to the Nazis in the first line of his first ever edit. I have read your admission that you work for the man and his company. That is |conflict of interest, no other way around it. Look at what you yourself said, ''"we are doing a job to inform the public of "Proven" methods in organisational change and training, this makes us no money or helps us to sell books or porduct, true, it is PR"''. Wikipedia is not that place. It needs to be established '''elsewhere''' first. You've offered no proof that it has been covered in |reliable, verifiable sources that are independent of the subject. It's also extremely odd that so many paragraphs have been written in defense of these two articles, yet the articles themselves are still only one-line stubs
— User:DarkAudit, 13:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)