Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1316 Kasan
to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per  (specifically ) and . Also, {{Reply to|Andrew Davidson}}, please follow . Votes in AfDs should be based on the merits of the subject of the article, not opinions on the validity of the nomination.  While in this case bold change to redirect was considered, it does not hurt Wikipedia to allow for a formal discussion at AfD. While I too would like if these were all together, I am certain that if they were, editors would not check every single one and would only look at a few randomly in determining their notability (which is understandable given there are thousands, I suppose).  At least one of the individual noms resulted in keep, and that is the goal here.  Weed out the unimportant ones, keep the few that are notable.   says "A single paper is not enough to establish notability for most objects. Being mentioned alongside other similar objects, such as in a table of properties of 200 newly discovered supernovae, does not constitute non-trivial coverage; the paper needs to have significant commentary on the object." &#8213;&nbsp
— User:Padenton, 15:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NASTRO||WP:NASTCRIT||WP:GNG||WP:AGF||WP:NASTCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)