Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Katelyn Nicole Davis
per  and . The fact that an event got significant coverage during a short spate of media interest does not mean we can have an article on it. For that it needs to have sustained coverage. The only source cited in the article which was not part of the initial flurry of media interest is an article published by an Irish tabloid five months later in which it is briefly mentioned, this is not evidence of sustained coverage. In the linked DRV discussion there were a couple of links to books which mentioned it in passing as an example of a modern social phenomenon, I don't think that's sufficient either. I'm happy for the topic to be covered as part of an article on Facebook and suicide or suicide and the internet but we don't seem to have such a thing.There is also a serious BLP concern with the article. It makes several very serious accusations against living people. While it doesn't name names any more it is clear from the wording that only a few people could have done what is alleged. Per  we shouldn't be doing this in the absence of a conviction. The article does say that the police opened an investigation into these accusations, but it doesn't say what the outcome of it was, presumably because it's too low profile to be reported. As a result the suspicion of guilt is left dangling in the article indefinitely
— User:Hut, 21:22, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLPCRIME (Wikipedia:Notability)