Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle Transporter
to Space:_1999#Special_effects,_design_and_music as it is mentioned there and serves as a valid redirect target. First of all, I find it puzzling that {{u|Michig}}, an admin who I respect a lot, used a combination of , , and  all in one (before  is pulled up, the "Popular" statement is subjective for that to be a common sense either)! Second, I don't see enough evidence like the nominator, that it is independently notable of Space 1999, nor there is any significant coverage of it to be found, making it fail 
— User:Jovanmilic97, 10:02, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:ITSIMPORTANT||WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)