Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Fluke (3rd nomination)
For some history, the article was the source of a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Fluke|long-running AfD that ended in delete. Then Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 June 21|after deletion review recreation was allowed, although the deletion decision wasn't overturned (whatever doublespeak that means) and the page was http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hoary|restored by Hoary, who had argued in the DRV for recreation.Her notability stems entirely from the Rush Limbaugh issue. Remove that piece of the puzzle and this wouldn't pass BLP1E. Testifying before congress doesn't make one notable, nor does writing a few pieces for CNN. Similarly the work she's doesn't appear to satisfy  itself. I think the earlier AfD was correct
— User:Shadowjams, 22:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)