Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phase (band)
The arguments given by Asouko (the author of the article), the other single purpose account, and the single purpose IP amount to (a) mentioning sources which are not reliable, not independent, or both, or too indiscriminate to be an indication of notability (e.g. a blog, press releases, amazon), (b) asserting that it is "undeniable" that a performance by the band is of "undebatable notability", despite the fact that others clearly do deny it, (b) stating that there are other articles which, it is claimed, are no better, (c) saying that anyone who thinks the article should be deleted is "fascist" and "nazi", and is "playing the cops". None of these are reasons for not deleting under Wikipedia policy. The only independent editor to argue for "keep", ChrisGualtieri, says "Meets WP:GNG and that is the only thing which matters", but, as Ten Pound Hammer points out, ''does not give any indication at all of how or why it "meets WP:GNG"''. There are 16 references in the article. One of those does not mention "Phase", some of them barely mention it, or merely include it in a list. Some are clearly not independent sources, or not reliable sources. I am not saying "delete", because it may be that there are some reliable sources, but it has not yet been demonstrated that there are. None of the editors saying "keep" have been around for more than a few months, so it may be that they are not clear what is needed to establish notability. Those who are asking for "keep" need to read the guideline on |reliable sources, if they haven't already done so, and explain clearly which sources are reliable and why. If they can do so, then that will be great, but if not, then the article will have to be deleted
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)