Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porn for the Blind (2nd nomination)
The issue here is not whether it is a joke site, but whether there is enough in the article to meet . Wired obviously is a |reliable source as it is one of the biggest tech 'zines out there. The Nassau Weekly reference is debatable, as it is a student-run literary paper from Princeton, and I'm not 100% sure on it's reliability, as it appears to be more of an op-ed paper than a journalistic one. Keep in mind that we aren't debating whether this is a "joke" site or not, but whether this is notable enough of Wikipedia. As I said in my nomination, since I helped in filing the AfD, I'm going to '''abstain''' from giving my opinion
— User:Wildthing61476, 19:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)