Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional reptiles
as valid navigational index per , and as complementary to :Category:Fictional reptiles per . The claims are wholly without merit that the contents of this list are unverifiable, as the inclusion criteria is simply being 1) a fictional character, that is 2) a reptile or reptilian. Complaints about uncertain inclusion seem to rest upon the equivocation of fictional with legendary or mythical (a meaningful distinction we maintain elsewhere; "fictional" does not simply mean "does not exist", but rather "originating in fiction"), or the issue of how far down the notability scale inclusion should go, which is an ordinary editing determination commonly made for lists of this sort. Editors may decide this is only for characters that have their own articles, or that the list should be broader and include significant characters from works of fiction that have their own articles
— User:Postdlf, 13:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)