Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad science methods
nice effort, but I don't think it belongs here. It is almost like a how to, and I think  applies. The list is potentially endless, a better article would be about correct scientific technique. I am somewhat reminded of the barometer question,  something that sounds bad could be good, and vice versa
— [[User talk:Martin451|Martin'''451''']], 17:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTGUIDE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)