Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PropertyGuru (company)
There's a protocol for dealing with  articles which if followed would have lead the nominator to consider . The claim that the article "majorly having  refs from just one source The Straits Times" is not justified. The subject has wp:sigcov meeting the wp:3REFS minimum in wp:RS one of which, {{Cite news|title=TPG-Backed PropertyGuru Eyes $2 Billion Thiel SPAC Deal|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-08/li-s-bridgetown-2-spac-said-in-talks-to-merge-with-propertyguru|last=Li|first=Fiona|date=2021-06-08|access-date=2021-06-15|work=Bloomberg News}} is listed green at  (Bloomberg News). In regards to The Straits Times, it's WP entry says, "daily average circulation of 364,134 and 364,849 respectively in 2017" and while there is some criticism further down the page alluding to its unreliability for politically charged matters there is no consensus at  stating that The Straits Times is unreliable for purposes of establishing . Additionally, the WP for Business Times (Singapore) reads "'''The ''Business Times''''' is Singapore's only financial daily" and although it shares the same parent company as The Straits Times it hasn't been part of the paper for almost half a century. There's also significant coverage in CNA (TV network) {{Cite news|title=Singapore's PropertyGuru raises S$200m funding from KKR|url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/singapore-s-propertyguru-raises-s-200m-funding-from-kkr-10883868|date=2018-10-31|access-date=2021-06-08|work=CNA (TV network)}} one of Singapore's national news channels, all of which adds up to 
— User:Black, 10:23, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MILL||WP:ATD||WP:RSP||WP:RSN||WP:NCORP||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill)