Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mackenzie Calhoun
1) No ''deletion'' rationale advanced: even if it's non-notable  expects that it be merged or redirected.  There's no question it's verifiable.  2) Several RS'es exist, specifically in the 'news' and 'books' sections of the above {{tl|Find sources AFD}} template, sufficient to meet GNG. 3) As a notable author, Peter David's own comments meet 
— User:Jclemens, 05:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:SPS (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)