Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Landing
There are dozens (hundreds? thousands?) of reliable sources discussing this place/place name. I think this becomes especially clear in light of {{u|Eperoton}}'s well-considered edit from "planned suburb" to just "area" -- and there may be other ways to frame it that could be better still. Per local authorities, it is not "just Crystal City" but rather a wider area that, the authorities say, should be considered under one umbrella. Yes, the name first became public because of the HQ2 project, but that's why you can't run a Google search for it, exclude the word Amazon, and conclude there aren't any reliable sources left. Of course any mention of the area is going to mention Amazon! Even if the name sticks and starts dotting highway signs and postcards in five years, 99% of the reliable sources about it are still going to mention Amazon because HQ2 is going to be a huge part of the identity of the area going forward. And conversely, as long as Amazon and the local governments and commercial interests are using "National Landing" to refer to the neighborhoods around HQ2, the name will have some currency and notability through sustained coverage of that development as it grows. The name may or may not "happen" long term, but in the near to mid term, the name and the concept of the overall area are notable and amply documented. Readers will continue to seek information about this place that continues to be mentioned in news articles, and rather than surprise readers with a redirect to Crystal City (which is also factually incorrect) or a generic "Neighborhoods of ___" article, Wikipedia should bring them to an updated, well-sourced article about the place they want to know about. As a result, I agree with {{u|MPS}} that the best course is to keep the page, maintain it as things develop, and if it turns out that the name ultimately does not stick, it can then perhaps be moved under a neighborhood list subject to the caveats above. I believe the |"not temporary" guidelines support and even require this: "Notability is not temporary; ''once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage''," but notability may be reassessed from time to time in future AfD discussions
— User:EightYearBreak, 19:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NTEMP (Wikipedia:Notability)