Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgetown Emergency Response Medical Service
A reliable source is a reliable source. Per  - "One signal that a news organization engages in fact-checking and has a reputation for accuracy is the publication of corrections." Of course student news papers publish corrections. Regarding Stalwart111's comment, there's plenty of reliable source material in the article itself for the topic per . The sourced article has plenty of depth and that depth came from the sources, so I don't see  as an issue. If The Hoya doesn't write about the Georgetown Emergency Response Medical Service the medical service won't respond to The Hoya staff's medical needs? No. The Hoya has editorial independence from Georgetown Emergency Response Medical Service (e.g., the service doesn't dictate content of The Hoya) and no one has brought forth any conflicts of interest (potential for personal, financial, or political gain from The Hoya) regarding Georgetown Emergency Response Medical Service. The Hoya is independent of the topic. Reliable sources publish information, Wikipedia summarizes that information. It's a fairly straight forward process
— User:Uzma, 02:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEWSORG||WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)