Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Submit Express
The best source -- and it is indeed a good one -- is Forbes. That's the only one that looks to provide significant coverage in a reliable secondary source...which isn't a trade publication. Trade publications count, to be sure, but in the sense that a local paper counts vs. a national paper (important to some vs. important to a broad audience). There are some good industry sources to be acknowledged, like Visibility and Search Engine Journal. So it's borderline, but what pushes it over to delete for me is that all of the best sources are interviews, thus more about Zarokian than the company. That means they count for notability (though I think they make a stronger notability case for Zarokian himself), but are  for the purpose of building an article. It's not clear, and I'd be willing to change my !vote upon new sources turning up. --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 05:19, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:No original research)