Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisabeth Dawson
None of these sources count as strong evidence of notability per . People don't get over a notability criterion by speaking about themselves or other things in interviews, so even the source Powerenwiki singled out above as the only substantial reference still doesn't actually clinch anything in and of itself — and all of the other sources are weaker for the very reason Powerenwiki identified: they're either routine promotion, or glancing namechecks of her existence as a giver of soundbite, not coverage that's substantively about her
— User:Bearcat, 00:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)