Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athar Siddiqui
Sources presented in the article do not amount to in-depth coverage and are heavily dependent on a single source, Times of India. The coverage seems minor. I can't speak to the roles performed, but after looking at each article listed above - the features appear to list a significant number of actors, among which Siddiqui is not especially standing out - our own coverage of him does not indicate significance of roles performed, so I do agree that this presently fails . Source search, particularly  turns up mostly Times of India, which is noted in  "to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable." In this case, I would say the standard for notability demands more in-depth coverage than shown currently - I'm not seeing evidence of passing 
— [[User_talk:Asukite|&nbsp;A&nbsp;S&nbsp;U&nbsp;K&nbsp;I&nbsp;T&nbsp;E&nbsp;]], 05:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACTOR||WP:RSSE||WP:RSP||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)