Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikinfo (4th nomination)
Disregarding the apparently bad-faith nom and ignoring the silly vendetta from Encyclopedia Dramatica users, there really is no reliable secondary sources demonstrating |notability or allowing |verifiability. As others have mentioned, the two or three secondary sources are just passing mentions in the context that it was forked from Wikipedia. Google News Archives only returns one result (one of the above passing mentions cited), LexisNexis returns none. The above sources verify enough information to maybe merit a short mention in History of Wikipedia|History or Criticism of Wikipedia about how Wikinfo forked from Wikipedia and why, but not enough for a full verifiable article
— User:Krimpet, 20:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)