Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reaver (Firefly) (2nd nomination)
The independent sources provided by JClemens show that there's enough significant coverage to meet the . The coverage in the http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1105&context=honors honors thesis, http://slayageonline.com/essays/slayage25/Curry.htm Slayage paper, http://books.google.com/books?id=i_pfs_4vQooC&pg=PA193&dq=firefly+reaver&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NED1T-v8PIesrQHPhNHJAw&ved=0CFMQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=firefly%20reaver&f=false book, http://faculty.weber.edu/srogers/archive/FA09/2810-4810/4810.pdf syllabus, and (apparently) http://books.google.com/books?id=Z8dkAAAAMAAJ&q=firefly+reaver&dq=firefly+reaver&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NED1T-v8PIesrQHPhNHJAw&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBQ ''Finding Serenity'' are more than just throw-away mentions in plot summaries. The article's in-universe perspective and its need for expansion |are not good reasons for deletion. Wikipedia is in a state of becoming, so tag it with {{tl|in-universe}} and let's get on with it
— User:Braincricket, 14:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RUBBISH (Wikipedia:Notability)