Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gender euphoria
agree with Crossroads but will expand my opinion as well - a neologism should not be based solely on ''temporal'' newness, but also based on both ''professional'' and ''colloquial adoption''. A term that's been around for centuries can still be a neologism if it ''never'' got widespread adoption - once a term has gotten widespread adoption it can no longer be a neologism, but until then, it may still be no matter how many decades have passed since it was "coined". I personally do not, based on the sources here, in the article, and from a google search, see enough usage to consider it more than a neologism at this point. The vast majority of usage is from activists and people who are not medical professionals - whereas "gender dysphoria" has become an accepted medical term, this is hardly used in a medical sense, much less become accepted as such. |Wikipedia doesn't need to "lead the charge" and can wait to have an article, or even a redirect, for this term until if/when it becomes widely used. I appreciate the work of those trying to improve coverage of gender dysphoria and transgender topics on Wikipedia, but we must keep in mind that it's our job to write an encyclopedia - and be sure that we don't let our desire to improve coverage of a topic lead to inadvertent |overt activism for a topic that is beyond what we should be doing as an encyclopedia. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez
— User:Berchanhimez, 19:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DEADLINE||WP:ACTIVISM (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)