Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Directional Michigan (3rd nomination)
per X96lee15's reasoning. as the term fails . Looking through all 19 references (two of which are links to conference websites, another two are dead links), I found that not one of them discusses the term, instead just uses it. Per , the sources need to "address the subject directly in detail, so o original research|no original research is needed to extract the content." However, not one of the sources actually tells the reader what the term "Directional Michigan" means and therefore most, if not all, of the article's content is original research. The bulk of the article also explains where exactly the term has been used, which is not notable
— User:Eagles247, 19:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)