Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Petrus Kalil
pending investigation.  IF the sources support the claims in the article, then the article meets  (significant veriable secondary discussion) and , and should not be deleted merely because someone is upset by the content.  However if the sources less than 100% support the content then all unsourced content should immediately be deleted per .  (Being foreign language sources I'm not able to put an opinion on whether they support the article or not.) As a potential defamation issue it might be worth notifying an admin so that more speedy steps can be taken to look over the article and take appropriate action
— User:DustFormsWords, 02:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:BLP||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)