Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Vladimir Putin (3rd nomination)
Regardless of the  argument that is going to come up, this article is a gross violation of both  and . It is absolutely correct that some of this material should exist, but where? In the main articles for a start, where much of this information is already present. Not in articles such as this, which are magnets for the loon  type views that often create a situation which is breaching . Take for example, Criticism_of_Vladimir_Putin#Allegations_of_political_assassinations_and_muzzling_of_reporters, which is presented in such a way to try and prove the ''guilt'' of Putin of muzzling reporters, and then ordering assassinations on those who won't be muzzled. Well what would one expect when the article is essentially from the POV of the Berezovsky crowd? All criticism belongs in relevant articles, not in coatrack articles such as this
— User:Russavia, 19:53, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:BLP||WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)