Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Mithen
I'm not voting here because on principle I don't like the idea of judging entry contents based on the behavior of editors.  However, the creation of this entry was disruptive and the existence of entries like it, when created under these circumstances will only continue to cause problems for Wikipedia.  We don't want to establish a precedent for editors to create entries  in order to buttress a |point.  Likewise, entries like this one might get the axe because of the disruptive behavior that begot them without being judged fairly by those who could actually determine the notability of the subject.  I sure can't in this instance.  I wonder if the proper route here is not to delete the entry but to look into the disruptive pattern of editing from whence it came
— User:PelleSmith, 18:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)