Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Blacketer controversy
after reading through the arguments pro and con, I find the argument that our own logs prove the sources are misleading, and hence not |reliable for our purpose, convincing. The picture edit is a non-issue on several levels (fairly accurate edit summary, fair-use vs. free-use, etc.) While Boothroyd might be notable enough to keep, this article definitely isn't
— User:SarekOfVulcan, 15:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)