Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical Storm Beatriz (2005)
IMHO, any named tropical system meets  ''by the fact that it is a named tropical system''. ,  and  are being used as clubs with which to beat articles, and this disturbs me greatly. Is Wikipedia running out of server space? I might be mistaken, but I don't think it is. Given that, and that OTPAPER|Wikipedia is not paper, why are so many articles that are |verifiable using |reliable sources being deleted - especially this mass deletion of tropical cyclone articles? The very simple reason seems to be |they just don't like having them around, and use "notability" as an excuse to be rid of them
— User:The, 22:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:INSERTYETANOTHERNOTABILITYSTANDARDHERE||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)