Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dexter Edge
Seven articles archived in JSTOR is far above the norm for a musicological researcher; his articles are heavily cited there and he's extremely well regarded in Bach/Mozart circles, being invited to nearly every major conference I can think of there.  On the weak side for musicological notability, he doesn't have a permanent academic post (though being a senior appointee at PHI is almost significant enough itself).  Musicology is not a discipline where you can expect to find FUTON bias|free evidence and articles on the web. Reading through the journals in the field makes it clear that Edge's output and notability is clearly above the average for the field.  I went through the list of Cat. American Musicologists a few months ago for a discussion on  and identified 8 that I think should be brought to AfD (I'll send the list offline, if anyone'd like) and several borderline cases, but Edge was not an "edge case" by any means
— User:Mscuthbert, 01:50, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)