Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamplin v James
This case is notable: a search of the lawbooks indicates it is a widely known precedent in contract law (see http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinosrch.cgi?query=tamplin+w%2F2+james&results=50&mask_world=&mask_path=&callback=on&method=auto&meta=%2Fau here just for Australian cases). This would clearly pass otabilty (law) (currently a proposed guideline. The problem is the article is terrible, and perhaps includes a copyright violation of a law report (the headnote reads like a law report). I will aim to fix this article over the next day or so
— User:Mkativerata, 19:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)