Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Rougeau
both per blatant failure of nominator to perform  and for a nomination statement that does not even address the appropriate notability criterion, . This is a brand-new article, not in great shape as nominated, but . Subject appears to pass #C6 both as head of a major scholarly association and as head of a notable institution of higher learning. Notability in general does not require sources to be non-primary (although for  they should be independent, reliable, and in-depth) and  does not even require them to be independent. And in this case, independent reliable secondary sources appear plentiful in Google News searches
— User:David, 21:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:PROF||WP:DINC||WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)