Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olde Boston Bulldogge
to a related real breed, in summary form as a section. Aside from all the issues addressed above, this is a  problem. WP is not for backyard-breeder experiments (especially unscientific "de-extinction" nonsense). To the extent there is any sourcing about this at all outside of  junk, none of it is in-depth, and it's not consistent, treating the subject as an experimental crossbreed, a sub-breed, a breed re-creation (which is not actually genetically possible), a fake breed for marketing to suckers, etc. It's routine to either delete or summarize and merge when a subject cannot be clearly delineated, is dubious as to veracity, of no or uncertain lasting encyclopedic significance as a stand-alone topic, or simply redundant with existing better material. This seems to be all of those at once, and WP doesn't exist for promoting alleged breeds not recognized by any legitimate registry organization anyway. There's a lot of money in dog breeding, thus a lot of incentive to try to use WP for advertising. Not every cluster of domesticated animals or plants someone sticks a name on constitutes a ''breed'' in any sense WP and its readership will care about. &nbsp;—&thinsp
— User:AReaderOutThataway, 17:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFT||WP:UGC (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)