Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Aaron Roberts
as nominator. No further sources have been offered except for http://www.trystanowainhughes.com/#/compassion-quest-reviews/4574224298 which I would classify as trivial, merely a link from a book promotional page back to a review on the blog of the person under discussion. I would question if even that was independent as it is a review of his "former lecturer". The further links to the new media awards are merely passing mentions. The IP:92.19.219.41 seems to be proposing that as the organisation is notable (which it is) then the awards are notable. This is questionable especially as no proof of such notability is offered. Then they state "...anyone who receives it is notable." which in my opinion is plain wrong. I'd cite  as part of "Arguments to avoid": "''notability of a parent entity or topic (of a parent-child "tree") does not always imply the notability of the subordinate entities.''". The IPs argument actually involves a double level of inheritance none of which is supported by sources unconnected with the subject or more than trivial in nature
— User:Tassedethe, 18:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)