Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lundby (dollhouses)
If this company has been building dollhouses since the 1940s then that's notable. The nominator misunderstands the concept of , as another editor has http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lundby_%28dollhouses%29&diff=161598599&oldid=161589299 already explained, when they attempted to get this speedily deleted... twice. I notice the nominator claimed that they "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smashville&diff=prev&oldid=161696979 have discussed it with a couple of administrators who also felt it was blatant advertising". Please include links to those discussions in this AFD, if administrators are claiming this article is "blatant advertising" then they shouldn't be admin, although I couldn't actually find any record of these alleged discussions, what could have happened to them? It's a standard thing in every article about a company to list the official site, that isn't "blatant website advertising". It's also acceptable (and encyclopedic) to decribe what their most popular house is, or what sizes they are. No reason at all for deletion here, good faith nomination, but totally misguided. At worst it could do with another source (I already added one
— User:Masaruemoto, 03:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPAM (Wikipedia:Spam)