Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dustin Berg
WP:N/CA outlines the notability of criminal ''acts'', while  (a sub-section of the former, the notability guidelines for ''perpetrators'' of crime.  Given this article is about the individual, rather than the event,  applies.  A criminal perpetrators is notable if any one of the following is true:1.  ''The perpetrator is notable for something beyond the crime itself...'' (Berg fails on this one)2.  ''The victim is a renowned world figure, or immediate family member of a renowned world figure...'' (Fails)3.  ''The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual or has otherwise been considered noteworthy such that it is a well-documented historic event...''  This, according to the guideline is true if there is persistent coverage about the event.  This is also not true.  http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Dustin+Berg%22 Here you can see that news peaked during the event (the trial) and has dropped away completely i a relatively short period of time.  Compare this to Beverley Allitt, who has sustained http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Beverley+Allitt%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a news coverage for more than a decade.  Other than that, he gets little more than a passing mention in articles about related matters (for example the North County Times article cited in the "Reaction" section of the article.In all, there is simply not enough under the current guidelines for notability of perpetrators of crime to warrant Dustin Berg's inclusion
— User:Wikipeterproject, 19:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PERP (Wikipedia:Notability)