Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missed call
Aside from lack of refs (which I believe can be found; I've seen enough evidence that this is a real phenomenon), the problem is mainly that the article is about ''a specific phenomenon'', not about ''missed calls'' in general.  Every time I fail to answer my phone (cell or otherwise) then that is a "missed call" but it is not what is being described here as a missed call. I do not consider myself knowledgeable enough on the topic to suggest a better name for it off the top of my head.  Adding links to other WP articles does not do anything to "merit inclusion". If it does not have at least one reliable source by the time this AfD closes, it should be deleted, per , and that has nothing whatsoever to do with American bias.  If the phenomenon is |notable, someone will create a |reliably sourced article on it later. It also needs copyediting, as it reads like it was written in an e-mail or something, i.e. it has an inappropriate informal tone and imprecise, ambiguous wording. PS: Agree with Dhartung that there is likely more than one rationale behind calling someone and hanging up before they answer so that they call you back
— User:SMcCandlish, 14:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)