Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerkcity
If the nominator had even taken a moment to do a Google search on Jerkcity, he would have found numerous third-party references. http://www.amazon.com/Big-Book-Jerkcity-Harrison-Page/dp/0966331184 Amazon.com, http://www.tcj.com/232/i_farnon.html TCJ.com, http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/08/09/comics/index2.html Salon.com, http://www.rotten.com/library/culture/jerkcity/ Rotten.com, http://www.nndb.com/group/844/000096556/ nndb.com, http://www.pigdog.org/jerkcity/ Pigdog.org. Now of course, you can always claim that these aren't "reliable" third-party sources, but since there's no criteria on which to base whether a source is reliable or not, you're still just making it up as you go. And applying  to an article about a webcomic where the accuracy of the article is not at issue is just double-talk
— User:Ariochiv, 08:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)