Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ioquake3
and redirect to id Tech 3. There is a large volume of sources plastered across the article, but that isn't what the |notability guideline is about. What's being asked for is ''significant coverage'' in |reliable sources, IE do the bricks exist to build a proper wall. In this case I'd say no, by a mile, outside of press releases, copy-and-paste jobs etc. it's just passing mentions which are by definition no good for building a standalone article. If Ioquake3 is part of Tech 3's story then that's where it should be, it's still present on WP but as part of a larger subject rather than a standalone which isn't working out
— User:Someone, 19:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)