Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Jeong
WP:notability|Not notable. There are two related instances of |sensationalised fame. Who is this lady? A journalist among 32,000 in the US and multiple hundreds of thousands in the world. {{redact}} However, concerning this subject we have to battle over whitewashing sourced content to make it look better when the "claim to fame" is the tweets. Without the tweets what is she notable for? What national journalistics award does she claim? If there are claims it is as a "senior staff writer" then that is premature as |too soon and I can argue that "just that alone" is not really notable. Because there is some sourcing out there does not mean Wikipedia "MUST" have an article on it. Especially of a Wikipedia:Notability (journalists)|non-notable journalist some |''hope'' will be someone. Maybe any news is good news because Wikipedia is being painted as supporting this: http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/05/wikipedia-sarah-jeong-new-york-times/ '''ACTIVIST WIKIPEDIA EDITORS FORBID ANY MENTION OF SARAH JEONG’S RACIST TWEETS IN HER PAGE'''. Some are there (now maybe) but watered down
— User:Otr500, 16:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SENSATIONAL||WP:TOOSOON||WP:BALL (Wikipedia:Notability)