Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronson Webb
as A suitable Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment#Grades|start class article which can be expanded over time and through editorial attention.  As long as information within a BLP is properly |verifiable, we do not "have" a demand that it be it be "|immediately perfect", nor we do not mandate it "be right now" some Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment#Grades|class "A" article or even a Wikipedia:Featured articles|featured article.  We have a reasonable assertion that it meets  and .  I am mindful that |the guide WP:GNG is just that... a guide that accepts the use of  and allows |occasional exceptions. I tried to clarify this when I wrote Wikipedia:Too soon and its section about |Actors and actresses, and the related Wikipedia:The GNG and notability for actors. I note with thanks the efforts of {{u|009o9}}, in that it has been markedly improved since https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronson_Webb&type=revision&diff=678457386&oldid=677676289 first nominated. It is no longer the unsourced new stub article that first caught the nominator's attention.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bronson_Webb&type=revision&diff=678457386&oldid=677676289   Being weak on GNG is not some automatic or immediate Death knell|death knell and it is now a decent start class that serves Wikipedia and its readers. Thanks
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 05:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:PERFECT||WP:BASIC||WP:ACTOR||WP:NOTAPOLICY||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:IAR||WP:NYA (Wikipedia:Verifiability)