Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AcoustID
Extremely curt nomination with no evidence of .  While the claim is it fails  that assumes is is in-scope for that criteria, I'm not immediately convinced it is.  On quite interesting note is :MusicBrainz has a specific mention at NMUSIC, and then at the :MusicBrainz article AcoustID and Chromaprint are specifically mentioned (albeit uncited) in the context of fingerprinting.  Should a competent and diligent BEFORE have picked this up, and perhaps also that the Chromaprint algorithm is perhaps the more important related topic.  In all events nom. seems in good standing, albeit seemed to have a high rate of reverting problematic edits, possibly an indicator of automation, and their talk page had lots of unsigned (by others) discussions. In passing note I've added (Chikanbanjar, 2017) to the article and claim RS towards GNG/SIGCOV
— User:Djm, 13:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:NMUSIC (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)