Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New relationship energy (2nd nomination)
as a |neologism.  Could be redirected, but infatuation and limerence would seem a bit |original research.  Google scholar turns up "new relationship energy" http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=jyq&q=%22new%20relationship%20energy%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws 10 hits, several of which are unrelated to polyamory and I don't see any discussions, just mentions.  Straight-up google turns up http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=jyq&q=%22new+relationship+energy%22&btnG=Search&meta= 4K with wikipedia at the top - never a good sign
— User:WLU, 02:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)