Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Joseph (2nd nomination)
and improve. The nominator voices concern with the article having only one reliable source.  But as there do seem to be "|'''multiple''' published, secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" actually available,http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2007&as_user_hdate=2011&q=%22Peter+Joseph%22+%2BZeitgeist&scoring=a&q=%22Peter+Joseph%22+%2BZeitgeist&lnav=od&btnG=Gohttp://www.google.com/search?q=%22Peter%20Joseph%22%20%2BZeitgeist&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=np  that speak toward the individial that have not (yet) been used, it would seem that the  is met and this is more a matter for improvement |through regular editing that not one requiring deletion.  A merge discussion can certainly be continued on the article talk page
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 18:47, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Notability)