Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen Kennedy
there appears to be little indication that voice-only roles, either in animation, dubbing into a foreign language (or both) are accorded any particular 'significance' or recognition by the video/television/movie industries. This is perhaps due to the lack of any strong recognisability accruing to the roles. Regardless, it is the animator (or original visual actor) that is perceived as the 'star', not the voice-actors. Wikipedia would appear to have two choices in such circumstances -- it can either allow  to guide its interpretation of  and consider that significant roles are those that generally garner significant coverage -- which has the advantage of generally resulting in articles on purportedly-biographical topics that have a reasonable level of ''biographical'' coverage. Alternately, it can impose its own ''subjective, expansive and independent'' interpretation of significant role -- resulting in a large number of articles that are little more than lists of roles cobbled together from  sources. Given that the latter would appear to be an invitation do violate , I believe it is  to go with the former
— User:Hrafn, 05:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR||WP:PRIMARY||WP:NOR||WP:COMMONSENSE (Wikipedia:Notability)