Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Niter (2nd nomination)
The nominator's definition of a reliable source seems contrary to what Wikipedia defines as a reliable source. Recommend nominator review  under "What counts as a reliable source."  Wikipedia doesn't define a Google search under "NEWS" tab as a sole reliable source.  The nominator was swift to demonstrate that a Google search for "Robert Niter" did not list one reliable source regarding the bodybuilder.  However, the Wikipedia article for Robert Niter clearly states that the bodybuilder is known as "Rob Niter."  Upon performing a Google search for "Rob Niter" (under the condition of the nominator), and clicking the "NEWS" tab; it is revealed that the bodybuilder is featured in an "independent" and secondary article in a well-known and reliably sourced newspaper: https://www.google.com.tr/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=msvWV82XIYaT8QeW_aHwCQ&gws_rd=ssl#q=rob+niter&tbm=nws Periodico Zocalo This is contrary to the nominator's statement that "He is nowhere mentioned in any reliable newspaper." I would highly encourage the nominator to review the Wikipedia article and its entirety prior to nominating for . Recommend speedy keep per
— User:GeoffreyT2000, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SOURCE||WP:AFD (Wikipedia:Verifiability)