Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dulcinea Media, Inc
By inspection, appears to be an encyclopedia of sorts, gathering and report news and related-to-news topics, including good citing to mainstream media. Thus it itself could qualify as , or at least clearly ''not'' |linkspam as nom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Smashville seems to think. For its own page to exist though, of course we need it to be notable, not just reliable. Their http://www.findingdulcinea.com/info/media-kit.html media page includes numerous links/reprints of substantial mention in media. Also, I found http://askpml.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/the-librarian-of-the-internet-findingdulcineacom/ this recommendation by a professional librarian (it's self-pub/blog, but it's an expert speaking in her area in her official capacity, so I think it's RS). A site that claims to do something but for which there is a reliable cite stating it does not actually ''does'' support notability of the site...frauds, hoaxes, and other crap that are important enough to be reported on as such pass 
— User:DMacks, 22:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:EL||WP:NOTABLE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)