Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snyderman and Rothman (study) (2nd nomination)
Firstly the title "Snyderman and Rothman (study)" includes the authors names and not the title of the article or the book. The article published in the journal "''American Psychologist''" is titled "''http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ351789&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ351789 Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence and Aptitude Testing''" and the book is titled "http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DAYO1Nggh3EC The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy". Based on , I would think that if the article were to be kept, it should be given either of the two names and not the present name. If the title of the book were to be chosen then the article should discuss the entire book, and not just the survey portion. If the title for the survey article is chosen, then the question then becomes does this single article deserve a standalone article. Such publications are not usually given standalone articles but can be cited in other articles. This is not a problem for books as they often have standalone pages. Many will argue that this study has been cited a number of other articles. In general Wikipedians who patrol the AFD tend to be more open to studies if they have been cited. At the same time, much of the material from the survey that isn't about race is not mentioned in the article. This does give the article the appearance of a POV fork
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NAME (Wikipedia:Article titles)