Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Islamic terrorist attacks
I'm just an another person who is amazed to see these experienced editors !voting "delete" here. The list simply meets |general notability guideline (150+ RS, how much more do you assume it would be needing to reach GNG?) and the list includes notable attacks that they do have a standalone article itself and are attributed to reliable sources. List_of_Islamic_terrorist_attacks|Visit the article page to confirm. The nominator argues #Synthesis as a reason of deletion (I do not see any other blue links there), which does not match any of the #Reason|reasons of deletion laid by |Wikipedia deletion policy. Well, we have a  here. Many long standing editors and administrators did follow the same, "as per nominator" (WP:SYN and neutrality is disputed). While, "inappropriate-title" as a reason of deletion was entertaining. Almost all keep reasons here, are , ,  or simply . "Neutrality is disputed", "at some instance verifiability fails" and "contains OR" are not reasons for deletion. The article, if includes such, requires discussion on the article's talk page, if needed a RfC, therefore clean-up not deletion!! eletion is not cleanup. |Wikipedia is NOT censored. The article meets GNG and should be kept
— User:Anupmehra, 21:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:OR||WP:DEL||WP:DEL||WP:DUCKSEASON||WP:JUSTAVOTE||WP:PERNOM||WP:MAJORITY||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:D||WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:Notability)