Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Michael Savage neologisms (second nomination)
merge and redirect''' would be alright, although I'm not certain there's much to merge), though not per nom, which fails to state a good reason for which deletion is appropriate.  I've been considering AfDing this for a while, principally because I think it's likely |largely unverifiable (at least inasmuch as many of the neologisms ostensibly come from the radio show and are not aggregated elsewhere), and in any event because |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate repository of information and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary|is not a dictionary.  That the neologisms are personal attacks is irrelevant (see, e.g., List of ethnic slurs and |Wikipedia is not censored); that the neologisms (which term may be largely inaccurate) are (in part) unverifiable and unencyclopedic cruft is.  Many participants in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Michael Savage neologisms|the previous AfD also offered excellent reasons for deletion, and those views should be incorporated by reference here
— User:Jahiegel, 05:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)