Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praise and veneration of Muhammad
The article as written has a rather staggering number of issues. Much, maybe even most, of the article seems to be written as if it were a persuasive essay, offering primary source citations as proof for the given analysis in a manner that clearly violates both  and . What analysis that is left to secondary sources is dominated by one rather outdated source to which the vast bulk of citations link. The 1985 book by Annemarie Schimmel is cited 40 times, 1/3rd of all the citations in the article. Most of the non-superfluous information is redundant as it it covered in depth elsewhere in several articles, and the sheer volume of long quotations is overwhelming and unwieldy
— User:UnequivocalAmbivalence, 13:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)