Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of incidents famously considered great blunders (2 nomination)
This list needs a lot of work to bring it up to scratch, because it has serious sourcing issues.  If the unsourced items on it were removed, we'd be left with just four of them.  I don't think the subjectivitity and neutrality issues are a serious problem, because as long as the opinion that an entry was a blunder can be attributed to reliable sources (and for items "famously" considered blunders, I'd be expecting multiple sources) then I'd say the opinion is verifiable.   states that we should prefer to fix articles by editing rather than deletion where this is possible.  My feeling is that it is possible to fix this one, although it'll be a lot of work
— User:JulesH, 07:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DELETION (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)