Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans National Place (2nd nomination)
plenty of sources, and I fundamentally disagree that things must have existed to be |notable. That argument (specifically with regard to planned works and buildings) has been raised and dismissed before. |Consensus has been that planned projects (even if later canceled) can be notable if they meet . This one does, I think
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 23:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)