Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher D'Elia
I usually think some of the critera in  on their own are not stringent enough (i.e., having a bunch of citations is extremely arbitrary for determining notability for generating content), but there's enough of a mixture to just make it past . Just a note that Google Scholar is not reliable for citation counts as the citation counts can sometimes vastly overinflated by included non-peer reviewed sources, sometimes websites, etc. Web of Science and Scopus show a decent publication history though. Nothing that would immediately make me think it would be worthwhile to write an article, but enough that I wouldn't argue against keeping it either
— User:Kingofaces43, 20:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)