Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipankar Home
The popular-press book looks like it's sufficiently notable per Qwfp, and his citation record, though weak as evidence for  #1, is enough to convince me that he's not known only one thing and that we should have a separate article on him rather than just merging into an article on the book
— User:David, 00:59, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)