Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Hudecki (2nd nomination)
Verifiability concerns are serious, but we dont delete articles for presently being unverified, but for being unverifiable. The difference between the two may just be work, e.g. finding this http://mad.durhamcollege.ca/EN/main/programs/animation/faculty/peter_hudecki.php.  Same story with notability, the material question is if a person with this profile would likely pass.  The answer is yes, also per the discussion at the first AfD. I'm concerned about the nomination.  It's surprising and disquieting if an editor (the nom) with 90,000 edits under his belt, presents such a distorted wiew of the  and the speciality  guidelines.  The original nom also cited a violation of  which is also misleading, if not grossly misleading, as the article contains no ''harmful'' info, if anything, the concerns could be vanity. These guidelines produce much cover for poor deletion rationales
— User:Power, 10:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)