Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Perriman
As David E says, the only claim to notability is her book on Dickinson, from a very minor publisher, which is insufficient as WP:AUTHOR and totally insufficient as WP:PROF. But with respect to some comments above,the reputation of a publisher is of extremely great importance in evaluations under WP:PROF because this is a key factor in how the academic professions evaluate careers; a PhD_a book based on the PhD are minimal qualification, showing knowledge of the subject, not being an authority in it; she has never been been hired even as an assistant professor anywhere;  not enough to get hired--and indeed, she apparently has never even been in a tenure track line.  But ISBN numbers are the standard identifier for books, and provides the input for ook sources. It's required information here for a book title, if available; the OCLC number is a useful supplement, to provide for books too old to be in the ISBN system. Though ISBNs were developed by the book trade they've been adopted as a standard by libraries also, as well as newspapers etc
— User:DGG, 00:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:B (Wikipedia:Bots)