Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Smith (minister)
The nomination sounds a bit like . I don't think we're stretching  #6 to say that the subject passes those guidelines. The only point, as far as I can see, is whether the Presbyterian Theological Centre qualifies as a "major academic institution". Now, the number of students is not all that relevant - the significant thing is that it is one of three official seminaries of the Presbyterian Church of Australia. BUT if you look at the notes on the criteria of PROF #6, "if the person has held the post of President or Chancellor (or Vice-Chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant accredited college or university..." It puts the emphasis on accreditation. It ''does'' use the word "significant", but that is not well-defined, and I would suggest the PTC ''is'' significant. Hence, this passes Wikipedia:Notability (academics). It simply isn't good enough to say " is, as written, overbroad" - it is a notability guideline, not an essay
— User:StAnselm, 21:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTBIGENOUGH||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)