Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downward Mobility and Divorce
I would disagree that "no substantial content" has been put up.  I ''do'' agree that this is a weakly sourced essay that looks like a  violation, and you could infer from nom's language that this was something put up last year and has been dangling ever since.  Wrong: nom filed a speedy ''eleven minutes'' after the article's creation, allowing for no time for improvement or proper sourcing.  ''If'' this article is unimproved a month from now, then deletion would be warranted, but this level of misdirection does the process no good
— User:Ravenswing, 13:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)