Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult-child sex
Because adult-child sex is "''commonly'' known as child sexual abuse" does not deny its being ''uncommonly'' known another way.  There is a clear difference between denying the existence of a view and agreeing that it exists but refuting it.  The term ''child sexual abuse'' is a term that inherently denies that there is any other perspective on the issue.  That even one person believes that adult-child sex isn't abuse is simply not a germane topic for that article.  The term ''adult-child sex'' allows for the existence of the minority view that not all adult-child sex is abusive.  Pro-pedophile activism|pro-pedophile activists exist, but their views are completely out of place in an article on child sexual abuse.  To be sure, I agree that adult-child sex is child abuse, but to deny that there is an opposition populated by people like Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault is simply counterfactual.   The term ''adult-child sex'', because it focuses on the objective act, allows both views to come in contact with one another, where ''child sexual abuse'' does not.   This article makes clear which is the majority view and which is the view of a small minority, but it would be dangerous to pretend that that minority doesn't exist.  Giving |due weight to the views on a topic (rather than denying their existence) is what we're supposed to do
— User:Ssbohio, 22:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)