Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewinsky (neologism)
for the same reasons I expressed at the Campaign for "santorum" neologism discussion.  The entire concept is a  on a .  It's a  and .   My view also has grounds in many areas of .  Simply put: This is not what an encyclopedia, regardless of how extensive, should be documenting in all juicy lurid details.  The funny thing is, I won't be surprised a bit if this gets deleted, and the santorum one gets kept.  But I'm starting to get used to the complete lack of consistency in this project
— User:Ched, 13:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATTACK||WP:BLP||WP:FORK||WP:COATRACK||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Attack page)