Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kin Fables
Unfortunately you seem to be making up the rules as you go along in this case.  The Montreal Gazette is a national source not a local hometown paper and does not cover the more insignificant items or subjects, and I have not read in  that a national reliable source should be excluded because the subject covered happens to be from the area that it is printed. For example an Evening Standard piece reviewing a London West End show is permitted as a reliable source showing notability. Also the  guidelines make it clear that exerpts from a piece can be sufficient for establishing notability; and the prose in an article that includes an interview is not necessarily sourced to the subject at all, that is just your presumption. Major articles in reliable sources most often include interviews particularly for balance and often after negative comment that is obviously not sourced to the subject so interviews can be reliable sources if they contain independent prose content and there is no evidence the prose in these interviews were not the result of independent research before the interview. When the new  rules were being drawn up I specifically asked if prose content from interviews was acceptable for notability and I was told by {{ping|Renata}} that such prose is acceptable even if the main part of the article is an interview so if such sources are acceptable for corpdepth which is much stricter than GNG then such sources such as six paragraphs before an interview are certainly acceptable for  as applied to film articles, regards
— User:Atlantic306, 20:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)