Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surgical neurology international
for all of the commentary and claims there still seems to be a lack of basic understanding as to how Wikipedia works, including the citation of user essays like Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals) as if it were a policy or guideline. The reality is that the only "official" standard that should be applied here is the same one as for every other subject - . That means we require significant coverage in multiple |reliable sources. The coverage included thus far (like press releases) is not sufficient in my view. I don't personally think a citation count (for a publication that generates them) is really relevant anyway. Produce significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and we'll talk. Until then, claims like, ''"thereby influencing subject-areas such as"'', should be removed until they can be properly |verified
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 06:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)