Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fiction that breaks the fourth wall (Second nomination)
Arkyan's point is extremely sound: Fourth wall includes sufficient examples to explain the concept, and the development of breaking it, for readers. This article is #IINFO|indiscriminate. Most of the examples, unlike the ones in Fourth wall, seem to have been picked entirely at random, and are unreferenced. So far as I can see, this list does not seem to fulfill any of the Wikipedia:List guideline#Purpose of lists|purposes of lists, and as Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists) says, "lists that are too general or too broad in scope have little value". This list has no encyclopedic value
— User:Angusmclellan, 21:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)