Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Hunter Adams
Fails  and . My concerns with the sources have already been articulated by {{u|Nsk92}}. There coverage is what I call trivial and the ones where the coverage is somewhat substantial are not independent sources. Accordingly, the significant coverage required is missing here. In fact, I looked up on Newspapers.com and wasn't able to find anything significant either. I'm not convinced about  either - no significant work, or highest post in academia. The closest claim is the one about being an editor of the journal, but the  criterion requires one to be an "editor-in-chief". Considering the lack of coverage in independent sources, I will go with a delete
— User:Lemongirl942, 12:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)