Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Kinsella (journalist and tech entrepreneur) (2nd nomination)
The previous AfD was closed with a very clear consensus of Keep.  Even if you discard Lapin's votes, you still had several other Keep votes, and good solid arguments for notability, wothout a single Delete vote.  This is a clear, deliberate, bad-faith violation of , you cannot claim that there is no evidence for notability when the prior AfD cited multiple reasons for notability.  As I pointed out in the previous AfD {{tq|If the article itself is factually correct, then the subject must be notable. Former Vice President at Microsoft, President of MSNBC.com, Chairman and CEO of World Online, Chairman and CEO of Interoute Communications, etc. Look, even if he was a figurehead (and I see no reason to assume this), simply holding those roles should have generated significant reliable sources about the subject. And I see that at least one of those companies, World Online, appears to have been involved in some sort of controversy around the time of the dot-com bust, which ought to have generated even more coverage and thus more RS. In addition to the sources already cited, it may be worth looking through the relevant articles on those other companies to see if they contain further good sources that mention Mr. Kinsella
— User:Hyperion35, 20:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)