Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geeta Seshu
Does not cross the threshold of otability (people) specifically . When I see several references I have a certain amount of questioning why there is an AFD. Initially discounting the ''Hoot'' the subject worked for I just randomly picked https://www.medianama.com/2018/05/223-namapolicy-mumbai-regulation-of-online-news-content/ Medianama (Subtitle: Can self-regulation even work?) that supports content ''"She is an influential voice on media in India."''. '''There is zero mention in the source''' that I could find to back up the |puff words. Adding content and irrelevant sources to bolster notability is |original research. I next looked at references for ''"Geeta is a prominent supporter of rights of women journalists and vocal about threats to them."''. The first reference https://www.newslaundry.com/ "Newslaundry" is nothing more than a laundry list of news captions. Apparently the subject did not stand out as I missed any mention after scrolling down for a good while. The second source https://www.firstpost.com/india/rana-ayyub-on-global-list-of-journalists-under-threat-abuse-of-those-pursuing-truth-must-be-stemmed-with-govt-action-6390521.html "Rana Ayyub on global list of journalists under threat: Abuse of those pursuing truth must be stemmed with govt action" centers on journalist and author Rana Ayyub and the subject did make comments on threats to journalists. It also stated the subject was a former consulting editor for Hoot and co-founder of the "Free Speech Collective". #1 of NJOURNALIST (1- The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors) would be coverage by peers writing on her like she did Rana Ayyub. I could not corroborate being co-founder of "Free Speech Collective" that might be important enough to pass  #3 and possibly #2. A subject just being a journalist is not notable. The number of full time journalists in India alone would be staggering with over List of newspapers in India|100,000 registered papers and considering free-lance the numbers could be over 2 million journalists world-wide (ex. 83,000 in the US, 84,000 in the UK, and 100,000 in Italy) so there needs to be clear indication the subject is "worthy of notice" more than just being List of Indian journalists|put on a list
— User:Otr500, 14:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:JOURNALIST||WP:PUFFERY||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)