Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClimateHouse
Perhaps there are non-English WP articles that have good sources, but assuming they establish notability isn't enough; that's essentially . The Italian and German articles (just translations of one or the other; not two articles) have a list of books but only one footnote to a useless government document. If an editor has actually read and understood the books at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/KlimaHaus#Literatur KlimaHaus#Literatur and wants to come here affirm those books meet , fine, accept that AGF. But otherwise we don't really know if these are self-published, have only passing mention, or what. The content iteslf is machine translated copy-paste of a boilerplate mission statement, and so there's nothing worth saving. Bad title, bad content. What is the point? Anyone is free to create KlimaHaus (CasaClima) and start fresh if they have the sources in their hands
— User:Dennis, 17:22, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MUSTBESOURCES||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)