Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Z. Lehrer
Given that the only third-party source that we have on his works (the Rognes review) is quite negative,  seems to apply. The source is reliably published, so it's ok to use it (and maybe necessary to use it if the article is kept, per ). But in a borderline case such as this, when a properly sourced article on the subject is likely to be negative, I think we should err on the side of not having an article at all
— User:David, 01:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)