Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-124b
I did find this topic interesting enough to edit the article, but unfortunately I couldn't find much more information than was already included. I read through  and the discussions on the talk page about exoplanets, and the discussion seems somewhat split on whether or not exoplanets are notable in and of themselves. Certainly the first several were, but now that they are becoming more common, some fall on the side of requiring independent coverage (essentially following NASTRO) and others on the side of keeping all exoplanets that meet certain objective observable criteria (no consensus was reached regarding the exact criteria). If pressed for a !vote I would probably err on the side of keeping it, as honestly this is the sort of thing I would probably use Wikipedia to find (being an astronomy nerd since I was a little kid), but I realize that I'm very likely in the minority on this one
— User:Cthomas3, 03:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NASTRO (Wikipedia:Notability)