Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Kroger
It's not an impasse at all, Pln9mg.  A subject doesn't become notable, per Wikipedia guidelines, by you believing that his work is important.  He becomes so through him receiving "significant coverage" in |multiple reliable, third-party sources.  It's well established that notability isn't achieved through being quoted in the newspapers; it's in the newspaper article being ''about'', in this case, Mr. Kroger.  Not one qualifying source mentioned in the article does more than deliver a single quote from Kroger amidst several other quotes
— User:Ravenswing, 19:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IRS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)