Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consolidated supervision
while the article lacks application of |MoS and ontext|context, it is obviously (in light of the sources provided by Wikidemo) a verifiable term; however the prose completely fails to explain the subject, and how it differs from financial supervision, of which it seems to claim itself a seed of. The most perplex  issue here is how anyone could accuse this of spam; I hope some of those using the term could elaborate—unless they have completely misunderstood and though the article was about an organization rather than a business term, which would be rather alarming
— User:Arsenikk, 17:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MOS||WP:C (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)