Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alignment (archaeology)
my first reaction was that this was another example of a wiki-article attempting to  a new meaning out of a commonly understood english phrase. However it appears that the term is in use in archaeological circles eg http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=8HKDtlPuM2oC&pg=PA37#v=onepage&q&f=false - I will add this as a source to the article. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alignment_%28archaeology%29&diff=515318722&oldid=514095932 diff However the definition given does not extend to the other definition given in the article, though I believe the article to be correct - I believe that the second definition given is also valid (based on having heard the term in use). I would suggest editorial oversight should leave the second definition in until it can be referenced. However some of the body text is a little to obtuse to be realistically left as is with out a single supporting reference (irrespective of whether it is right or wrong
— User:Oranjblud, 15:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)