Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Golden (businessman)
When we https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Golden_%28businessman%29&type=revision&diff=899413875&oldid=899019283 remove the auto-bio/promo/NOTLINKEDIN stuff that the nominator noted as concerns (including the unsupported claims and unattributed POV about the subject being a "renowned author" or a "sales and marketing thought leader"), we are left with three potential notability guidelines under which the subject might be considered. The first is . And, respectfully, publishing two titles (both seemingly released ''only'' at least one of which released primarily as Amazon/ebooks) doesn't meet the threshold of a "significant or well-known work or collective body of work". The second is  (and related guidelines applicable to businesses and business people). Here,  would seem to apply. In that, while the subject may have reached senior positions in several businesses, that doesn't confer notability by default. The third and final is . And, while the contributor above points to a single Irish Times piece (of which the subject is the primary topic), a single bio piece isn't enough to meet SIGCOV. The other links/etc offered fall well short (in that they are either not independent of the subject or the subject is not the primary topic. Or both.) That the subject would seem to be reasonably well known to people familiar with SPIN selling or other similar techniques notwithstanding, I'm not seeing enough to meet the criteria of the project
— User:Guliolopez, 22:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NCORP||WP:INHERITORG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)