Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kung-Flu
guys, you're getting it wrong. This page does not "disparage or threaten its subject", so it isn't an |attack page. Since when did we start deleting relevant search terms because they might be "racist" or "xenophobic" or whatever? Come on, we have an entire article on nigger, negro, chink, and we have extremely graphically detailed articles on sexual terms. To quote : "Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive‍—‌even exceedingly so. Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia." So far the Delete !votes have said that this page should be deleted because it is: racist, xenophobic, stereotypical, junk, useless, borderline racist, racist garbage, and a racist fringe term. If you're going to vote delete, explain why you think this term hasn't received enough coverage to stay here on WP. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese virus, just four days ago, was closed as keep because, well, it is a widely used term that has received enough significant coverage. Personally, I'm not sure whether "Kung-Flu" has received enough significant, reliable, coverage to deserve a place in our encyclopedia, but one thing's for sure, this page shouldn't be deleted on grounds or racism before nigger, negro, and chink go as well
— User:L293D, 12:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATP||WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:Attack page)