Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jory Prum
to Grim Fandango. I look to . While Prum has coverage in somewhat of a niche field, I see the sources discussed with Serge above and they don't speak of him in such a way to fulfill Creative #1, 2, 3, or 4, which puts us back at the |general notability guideline, where there is coverage that isn't quite |significant. Again, what is the subject known for? Is his oeuvre cited for its monumentality? The sources do not say yes. Additionally, the article is overrun with details that do not descend from secondary sources as something of a |hat rack. I would be happy to reconsider this stance if given more dedicated (and reliable) sourcing. This discussion is no doubt exacerbated by the author's inability to Wikipedia:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass|distance himself from the article. Wikipedia and AfD carries along just fine without any of us, and things move smoother when those overly involved can distance themselves. After deletion, I recommend a redirect to ''Grim Fandango'', Prum's most notable work. With his knowledge of and competency with Wikipedia, I hope the author sticks around  to edit |unrelated articles. czar&nbsp
— user:czar, 02:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:HATRACK||WP:VG||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)