Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prhizzm (third nomination)
I am the subject of the article, and will thus try to stay out of this debate. Four points need clarification, in case they are not immediately obvious: (1) the Minerals release is an album by wikipedia standards. See the Talk:Prhizzm page. (2) Alkivar may not be neutral in this particular debate because he and I recently fought extensively over his ill-conceived attempt to delete the Zanta article. (3) Seeing or not seeing someone perform is not relevant to assertions of notability on wikipedia. (4) I did not create the article and thus implied assertions of anity are weak at best. There, now I will try to stay out of the debate. :) Thanks
— [[User talk:BFD1|BFD1]]  One final clarification: I am not sure what JzG meant about my work being mainly self-published, because of the releases listed on the wikipedia page (which is more or less complete), only one release is self-published. I find JzG's remark in this context rather curious. [[User talk:BFD1|BFD1]], 13:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)