Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extitution
per nom. This appears to be a neologism that has, at least at present, very little if any mainstream recognition. BEFORE searches turn up essentially nothing besides what the nominator has listed. I'm not sure that at this point there is sufficient material for anything beyond (somewhat poorly) defining the term, which would fall afoul of ; it is also a fail of the GNG at this time due to the complete lack of independent, secondary reliable sources
— User:Cthomas3, 04:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTDICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)