Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedish Judicial Authority v. Julian Assange
as a Wikipedia:Content forking#POV forks|POV fork and a violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight|WP:UNDUE with continuous  violations. The information certainly meets  and that's why it was included in Julian Assange and given it's due wieght. This artcle was forked from the original and greatly expanded thus giving it increased weight. A similar article was created Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 December 17#Assange sex charges and trial|and deleted when this event started. The Assange article has been the focus of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive102#Julian Assange et al.|repeated BLP problems in recent months and has only been under control after http://toolserver.org/~mzmcbride/watcher/?db=enwiki_p&titles=Julian_Assange 291 people watch listed the article. This new article has http://toolserver.org/~mzmcbride/watcher/?db=enwiki_p&titles=Swedish_Judicial_Authority_v._Julian_Assange less than 30 and has had repeated BLP problems as noted on the Talk:Swedish Judicial Authority v. Julian Assange|talk page including an Talk:Swedish Judicial Authority v. Julian Assange#Focus of this article|RfC just to detemine what the article should be about. I think we should generally try to avoid another Siegenthaler incident
— User:Hydroxonium, 06:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)