Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audley Retirement
The  editor has followed correct disclosure procedures etc. in preparing this article. This is clearly a firm going about its business but is there |evidence that it is notable for an encyclopaedia? A Highbeam search turns up just a few routine announcements; a Guardian search is better, with http://www.theguardian.com/money/2012/jan/15/retirement-villages this describing the firm as "one of the biggest developers of retirement villages" in the UK, and passing quotation in a couple of other articles http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/jul/20/old-age-retirement-communities-village-developments, http://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2015/aug/24/retirement-villages-offer-a-better-quality-of-life-for-older-people-survey-finds, the latter a piece based on the firm's publicised research). However while these do establish the firm as prominent in their local sector, I don't think they amount to demonstration of  notability
— User:AllyD, 08:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:COI||:WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)