Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeitgeist the Movie
per Morton.  Since I have nothing to add to Morton's comment on why the article miserably fails inclusion, I'm going to address the keep votes.  The reasons behind every keep vote so far are atrocious.  They fall into three categories: A) |I like this movie and don't want to see it deleted!  B)  The article is new and we shouldn't delete it yet!  C)  It is notable due to word of mouth and hits on Google.  There is also another category of keep votes where the voters don't have any real reason to keep the article, so they just type "KEEP!" (note all caps and exclamation point), apparently because they think the loudest vote wins.  Category A is already widely dismissed on Wikipedia, so I won't address those arguments.  Category B fails to address the argument; the delete rationale is that the film fails our notability criteria for films, not that the article is bad.  The point is that no matter what happens to this newly created article (if kept), the subject is not worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia.  Category C also fails to address the inclusion requirement for films.  Word of mouth and Google hits are non-existant notability requirements
— User:Pablothegreat85, 21:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)