Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Municipal Code Corporation
requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. For example, the reference from 850 Business magazine relies entirely on an interview with the president of the topic company and does not contains and information/data that is "clearly attributable to a source *unaffiliated* to the subject", fails  as it does not have any "Independent Content".  The Tallahassee Magazine reference is a single sentence and the article does not contain any in-depth information on the company, fails . Finally, the Orlando Sentinel reference also relies entirely on information provided by Langford and the company and has no "Independent Content", fails . Topic fails 
— User:HighKing, 19:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)