Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychiatric abuse
I first looked at this article to give a 3rd opinion. Two significant problems would seem to support the AfD. First, the article appears to be an |original compilation of disparate items, without sufficient reliable sources that tie these items together. Hence, doesn't this article represent a |synthesis of items that the author considers connected? I raised this question and, while there may be some better sourcing of discrete items, the overall article still has this rather fatal flaw. Second, the ''article title'' is not based on |neutral terminology drawn from reliable sources. Instead, the title seems slanted and more likely to draw an array of controversial allegations (i.e., anything that is called or seems to be an abuse, i.e., a quote farm) rather than a coherent analysis and critique of psychiatry. Having raised this problem, I do wonder, why hasn't the article title been verified from quality sources (pref. academic)? Perhaps the title "psychiatric abuse" is mainly notable a term-of-art in Scientology. If so, then the article might be restructured and revised as an explanation of Scientology or Citizens Commission on Human Rights|CCHR doctrine or the like. Would the author (Sullivan) consider adding this content to Scientology and psychiatry? Or as an article growing out of that Scientology context? Thanks for hearing me out
— User:HG, 07:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:No original research)