Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Cloherty
after citing  I decided to try and do exactly that. Have cleaned up all the references, some of the commentary not strictly supported by references and some of the other sections that needed work. Am now seeing more than enough "significant coverage" to justify keeping the article. Have also brought some sections back to more  language to (hopefully) address some of the concerns the subject had about the article (which, looking at it, were entirely justified). None of the coverage cited is in any way negative (in either general tone or specific assertion) so suggestions in the intro that gave  weight to marginal commentary should not have been there - in essence, one paragraph was picked out from a pages-and-pages-long feature article, responsibility for that "issue" was arbitrarily attributed to the subject (without verification) and then given undue weight via inclusion in the intro. Really inappropriate. I have now changed my "vote" above to ''Keep'' and have struck some of my commentary now which is probably no longer relevant
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]], 02:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM||WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Editing policy)