Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time travel urban legends
I'd warrant that creating an entire article and cluding together slightly connected elements, instead of keeping them in their parent articles seems ever more wasteful. At least on of the componesnts - the Chaplin one, should be retained in the parent article. Titor already has its own article. We can categorize articles that have the 'mysterious time traveler' or whatever element. Its the difference between a smart encyclopedia and a |'nyah nyah nyah' one
— User:Jack, 14:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)