Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornado preparedness
the above summarised work has certainly improved the article but I just can't see how we can get past . The problem is that most of the "sources" provided '''are''' the how-to guides and FAQ-type pages from the various emergency management agencies. There's no real analysis of how tornado preparedness measures (implemented in the past) have had an impact on sustained damage or death rates or repair bills. There's no historical analysis of what tornado preparedness looked like in, say, 1900, then 1950 and then today. There's no analysis of the measures implemented in different countries or a comparison to measures implemented during different natural disasters. Those are the sorts of things I would expect to see in an encyclopaedia article about this subject. Instead, we still have mostly how-to type stuff. If the lede could be expanded into a full article and the step-by-step stuff removed, I think we would be getting closer. But I think we need more analytical, historical stuff rather than the "this is recommended" type stuff, if that makes sense
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 01:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTHOWTO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)