Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalya Rudakova (3rd nomination)
and tag with '''Merge''' to Transporter 3.  The fact that this was put up a 3rd time to make a point (or for whatever reason) aside.  It's been refused deletion twice at AfD.  If an actress makes it to the top of her profession, and actually gets to "play in the game" as it were - that is notable.   Transporter 3 has made over 30 Million dollars, it's not a home made web-episode.  As far as the WP:ENT argument?  I see it as a case of the guideline failing the article rather than the article failing the guideline.  OTHERSTUFFEXISTS?  That essay?  Nicely written essay, but still a one sided essay.  OTHERSTUFFEXISTS fails in the sense that we strive for consistency across the 'pedia.  I also remember the phrase "|preserve information" from our |Editing '''policy'''.  Now, that said, I can't find enough information at this time to build much more than a start-class article.  C-class at best.  The  sources aren't the best, but they exist.  Better to merge with Transporter 3, preserve the information, (and redirect "Natalya Rudakova"),  then if Rudakova continues with her career it can be spun out at a later date
— User:Ched, 04:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRESERVE||WP:EP||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Editing policy)