Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keqin Li
Nevermind, just saw the former content was in a better state because the things were removed around (including a reference of the official site of the subject, which while it is a primary source, it is still vital). I have no objections then, clearly passes #C3
— User:Jovanmilic97, 20:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)