Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trial of Gotovina et al
The supposed basis for the deletion (an "all-or-nothing" argument) is not based on policy and is therefore invalid. Editors are definitely not obliged to produce a series of articles in order for coverage to be "consistent". Given the volume of coverage of this particular topic (71 references in the article, out of which more than one half are in English), a notability-based line of attack against the article |does not stand a chance
— User:GregorB, 20:31, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOWBALL (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)