Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strong (relative detectability)
I created this article as a target for "Strong" in the disambiguation, in desperation (I think as a third-party editor) when an objection was raised years ago to calling Cygnus X-1 (in its FA review) "one of the strongest X-ray sources" in the sky.  I searched (not exhaustively, but at least until I was exhausted) for a reliable source for the usage in vain, yet it is firmly and widely established in scientific and technical literature (from physics to biology, signal processing, electronics, statistics, etc), and generally understood by practitioners and interested lay people.  A vast number of examples could be found, ''a la'' OED, but listing examples did not seem to formally satisfy Wikipedia sourcing requirements (and listing such examples would seem to be inappropriate  in any case) so I just decided to break the rules.  (I see the definition is no longer linked in from our Strong or Strength disambig pages.  I can understand how that might have happened, but it seems to me something is needed to answer the fair question of a technically naive editor
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)