Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Summerton (2nd nomination)
I agree that Summerton fails to meet the notability requirements of . She also fails to meet Wikipedia's |general notability criteria.  To meet , she must either have done something ground-breaking, be cited by peers or her work must be the subject of multiple independent reviews, etc.  None of these seem to be the case.  She is a professional photographer whose work is printed in magazines, but that is just her job.  Most online sources are either self promotion or photo credits.  The news articles are not at all exclusively about her, but rather just make mention of her in passing.  The references in the article are very weak and it is questionable whether they are independent at all.  They do not mention an author and are not published in a mainstream journal or magazine and the absence of such reliable, secondary source refernces points to a failure to the meet general notability requirements.  She's a good photographer, but not a notable one (by Wikipedia standards in any case
— User:Wikipeterproject, 19:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)