Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friendly artificial intelligence
None of those articles above substantiate and rigorously define the concept of "Friendly AI" as a scientific theory|theory beyond merely being . Further, the books you linked are citing non-notable sources for the materials on "Friendly AI" theory and are only covering the topic in 2-3 pages maximum at minimal depth. Oppose Keep on those grounds. As for a merge, I oppose that based on the argumentation that it isn't clear that "Friendly AI" as a  can be separated cleanly from this loose concept of the "theory" of "Friendly AI", which indeed has no credible sources which detail the subject matter. That is to say, people are saying that AI should be "friendly" and confusing or not seeing that there was indeed a speculative, non-rigorous fringe theory that specifies a kind of architecture for doing this. The Atlantic articles are blog-like, and directly link to the non-notable sources in question as well
— User:Lightbound, 22:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)