Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titanic alternative theories (2nd nomination)
I have posted a thread on the sources at Talk:Titanic_alternative_theories#Sources. Some of these "theories" have received some coverage. For example the coal fire, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22titanic%22+%22Coal+Fire%22. The pack ice and the mummy may also be notable for inclusion. The others should go, I think, or only be briefly mentioned (there's still http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1554121/Revealed-Titanic-was-doomed-before-it-set-sail.html). As most of this material is not mergeable (clearly ), I'd vote either delete or keep. There's already a mention in Titanic, Titanic#Alternative_theories. I'll wait and see if the article improves
— User:Cenarium, 21:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)