Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of opponents of same-sex marriage in the United States (2nd nomination)
These are well-referenced, so there are no BLP issues here, and these lists of national level politicians by which side of this prominent issue they took have significant educational and historical value. The "unmaintainability" argument can be addressed by restricting the timeframe, turning these into historical resources on an interesting question: who in U.S. politics was for and against gay marriage around the time it was legalized? Some of the arguments above seem completely illegitimate, including (to paraphrase) "my ''sense'' is that this is OR and biased" and (not to paraphrase) "huh?". The comparison to the Iran deal list is , and the argument that the outcome of that discussion was based on - the idea that lists of prominent supporters and opposers of ''historical'' political issues are encyclopedic, but lists of supporters and opposers of ''current'' political issues are not - is just wrong and is not based in policy at all. If something will be an acceptable topic with lasting significance twenty years from now (as this obviously will be) then it is an acceptable topic today
— User:Sammy1339, 04:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)