Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streisand effect (2nd nomination)
Adequate reliable and verifiable sources are provided to establish notability per the Wikipedia:Notability standard. You've got to love the claim that the article should be deleted because "Andy Greenberg - the author of the Forbes article - doesn't get to violate  and  any more then any one here does." We Wikipedians are the only ones under a  restriction; we are perfectly entitled to create articles based on what other people have "made up" as long as reliable and verifiable sources are provided. Even better is the claim that "if a mainstream source uses an article violating  as its source, the wikipedia article doesn't, all of a sudden, magically become justified." which implies that Wikipedia is "really" the source of the term. Doc, isn't this the plot of the move ''Back to the Future
— User:Alansohn, 01:52, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MADEUP||WP:NEO||WP:NEO||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)