Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Roskams
The previous AfD showed almost 2K citations and it handily exceeds that mark now. I think we're all growing tired of noms not understanding that citations ''are'' independent demonstration of notability and, even if there is not a single non-science or bio source, publications are still sufficient  to support basic statements regarding employment, areas of scientific interest/accomplishment, etc. This AfD is a waste of time and certain to be closed as "keep". Would be good form for nom to withdraw it
— User:Agricola44, 15:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)