Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kresimir Chris Kunej (2nd nomination)
per ,  as some editors above noted. Yes it is kind of on the borderline, but sources are plentiful, and sufficient to pass GNG. Also, I must concede that ANYBIO is met (...contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.) It does not matter how important or unimportant this field may be. The one paragraph conveniently titled in a way to point to this does show this, although I see potential  issues there (not a deletion issue, possibly a re-wording necessary). I tend to vote "delete" much more than "keep", and personally I do not like this article included on here but I do not see this as the usual BLP suspect. I like how some participants try to raise the bar to  (even the article creator foolishly), but that is not necessary since it seems several persons have stated GNG is passed. I tend to agree with Drmies that subject does not seem to pass  4 and 7, but I believe it passes  1
— User:WildHorsesPulled, 00:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:SYNTH||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)