Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in theoretical computer science
I don't find the arguments from general principles (/) above compelling.  The question is, can this list ''in principle'' be referenced in a way that meets our core principles?  I have no doubt that it can (see my arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in mathematics|here, mutatis mutandis).  Certainly nothing that the delete !votes have said to this point in the AfD argues against the impossibility of finding such sources.  (Lacking objectivity?  We have plenty of subjective information in the encyclopedia.  We just  and use sources.  I see no reason that wouldn't work here
— User:Sławomir, 13:18, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:OR||WP:ASF (Wikipedia:Verifiability)