Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactical hapkido
I've given this article all the benefit of the doubt I can. I simply can't find enough reliable ''third'' ''party'' sources to establish notability. All three articles rely heavily on their own sites as sources. There is a clear COI issue (which isn't a reason to delete, but it illustrates the promotional nature of the articles). Puffed up claims and an overall promotional tone. Simply fails  and  in my opinion
— User:Niteshift36, 16:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:MANOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)