Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John T. Walker
Not for the reasons stated above. There are either sources |verifying and providing information so that an enycyclopedia article can be written, or there aren't. In this case there are, in spades, which I deduce from and need go no further in researching than http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?frow=0&n=10&srcht=s&query=%22John+T.+Walker%22+bishop&srchst=nyt&hdlquery=&bylquery=&daterange=full&mon1=01&day1=01&year1=1981&mon2=07&day2=07&year2=2007&submit.x=22&submit.y=5 this. Probably all similarly situated religious leaders are notable as we use that word here, but not inherently; because all of them have been the subject of significant treatment in reliable sources (we cannot write a tertiary source encyclopedia entry from vapor, sources must exist
— User:Fuhghettaboutit, 19:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)