Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciklum
At this moment, I still do not see any evidence for ''...significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources...'' as required by . Most references are press releases or blogs. Only the Dutch "Computable" article is a reliable secondary source, as far as I can see
— User:Crowsnest, 10:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)