Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedona Underground
This seems a bit  to me, and the newsletter coverage seems to back this up. The real reason for my !vote is the fact that the article cites no "multiple third-party reliable sources" verifying any of the info in it, nor as a measure of notability. In addition the article is crufty in the extreme (cruft == high level of detail inappropriate for an encyclopedic "arm's length" treatment of the subject in question
— User:Zunaid, 14:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LOCAL (Wikipedia:Places of local interest)