Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Kronberg (2nd nomination)
the views being expressed here reflect a common belief that if it's in a newspaper, it belongs in Wikipedia. I think this is a misreading of policy, as seen in . Newspapers devote a lot of space to rumors, allegations and gossip -- encyclopedias do not. Once a story moves beyond the stage of allegations and innuendo, to a point where there are criminal charges for example, it becomes suitable material for an encyclopedia. In this case, that is clearly not going to happen. I would suggest a review of SCANDAL
— User:Leatherstocking, 05:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOTSCANDAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)