Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawyers in Hell
The difference between ''this'' book and Sue Grafton's Alphabet Mysteries are crucial: the Grafton books are all ''New York Times'' best-sellers, many have won the Edgar Award or other top honors in the mystery field, and each of the articles is properly cited with references from reliable third-party sources. For the "Hell" books, where are the '''sources cited''' that "contain sufficient critical commentary" to expand the articles? The "Hell" books, including this one, are mostly '''unreferenced''' stubs and do ''not'' meet the  guidelines. (I'm not going to pointlessly re-argue the notability of the Grafton books here, especially as you have chosen to put the next novel in the series up for AfD, but I will point out that it too was nominated without any apparent  efforts on your part so your complaint about Orange Mike is puzzling at best and hypocritical at worst.) I confess that my deep reserves of good faith are strained by this sequence of events
— User:Dravecky, 23:30, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)