Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock Turner
The information is important and notable via a conjunction of  and , which respectively define a notable person as a criminal who is otherwise notable, and an athlete who is otherwise notable.  A criminal athlete sounds potentially notable, and the months and months of media coverage puts me over the edge.   applies only to low-profile individuals: specifically, if an individual has engaged in any kind of self-promotion, they are likely to be considered high-profile.  I'm inclined to count Turner's father as an extension of Turner for the purposes of this policy, given the close nature of their relationship, and the specific nature of the crime.  As a case against renaming:The case in question is not well-known by any unanimous moniker: "the case with Brock Turner and the series of events and news coverage that followed" may be descriptive, but it's hardly convenient or useful.  If instead, we decided to pick one of the names for the Event in question from the various news stories, it's possible we might technically be hewing closer to our rules on neutrality, but we'd also be making a choice at the whim of whoever titled the article, and that seems to violate the spirit of neutrality we should be reaching for
— User:Comrade, 02:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRIME||WP:ATHLETE||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)