Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbrage (film)
Now well sourced, and enthusiastically expanded, and tenderly copyedited. I agree with Schmidt's assessment about  and the sources, above, especially Fangoria. The film's genre, and audience, determine the review pool in which it is known. In its genre, it is well known, and well represented in reviews. I disagree with any attempt to restrict film coverage to only ''mass market'' films, based on too-narrow interpretation of guideline. IMHO film blogs can be considered reliable due to accumulated author expertise, especially if the article only uses them for mundane claims. The claims made in the article are mundane, and are presented ''as opinion'', requiring only the sourcing that is provided. Any ''strongly disputed'' sources should be taken to , not adjudicated here
— User:Lexein, 07:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:RSN (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)