Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Post-Grunge (2nd nomination)
Where can I go to sort out my confusion with notable non-trivial sources versus notable content? I feel that the tags I'm seeing at the top of articles are misleading when they say it needs notable sources, yet notable sources are provided, but editors still claim the content is still not notable. In other words the tag to improve the article does not directly confront what is really needed. And because I don't understand the lack of notability within notable sources, I need some sort of instructional video, a page or talk thread that clears up the confusion for me.  and  have not sufficed, despite everyone citing those wikipolicies. {{ping|Robert McClenon}} has been the only one willing to attempt to recognize I'm not up to speed, that I've fallen into some sort of common "myth" at Wikipedia. So far as I can tell, it appears the measurement of notability within a notable article is left at the discretion of opinion, since the tags we apply to these articles only requests non-trivial sources be applied, not that the content itself is unnotable. If this myth is as pervasive at Robert McClenon suggests it is, we need to fix some of the policy to clarify as it's too ambiguous
— User:Leitmotiv, 17:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NALBUM (Wikipedia:Notability)