Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War on Terrorism casualties
those voicing delete and merge opinions raise concerns with some validity.  ''"War on terror"'' is an amorphous term.  Additionally, it is a term the Bush Presidency stopped using, and which the Obama Presidency has never used.  So the term is of historical, not current interest.  On the other hand, how is merging this article into War on terror#casualties an improvement?  Once merged ''"war on terror"'' remains amorphous, and of historical interest, since no official body uses the term any more.  War on terror#casualties directs readers to Casualties of the Iraq War and Civilian casualties of the War in Afghanistan (2001–present).  These are more clearly defined areas -- less amorphous than ''"war on terror"''.  IMO whether the central discussion remains in this article, or at War on terror#casualties I think it would be best if it quotes some  about the problems of defining ''"war on terror"'', and then directs readers to the more specific articles.  In addition to casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan ''"casualties of the war on terror"'' could include
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)