Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Racket (book)
The nom disagrees with the criteria set out at , which state "A book is notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria: The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews." They have written at my talkpage "I've thought for years that a literal interpretation of NBOOK is too low a standard". However, disagreeing with an integral Wikipedia policy is not a reason for deletion. I think this is made pretty clear by the statement the NOM made "Despite the reviews, not an important book" - surely one of this more interesting deletion justifications. Basically, that translates to me as "Despite meeting , it's not a book I like
— User:AusLondonder, 03:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BKCRIT||WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)