Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-printed books (2nd nomination)
The idea that we should have a list of the most numerous books which excludes the leading candidates such as the Bible is absurd.  If this is a content-fork of the list of best-selling books then, per , the remedy is "''If the content fork was unjustified, the more recent article should be merged back into the main article.''"  Merger is not deletion and so this a matter of ordinary editing.  As for the facts of the matter, I don't see why the print runs of religious works or the thoughts of Chairman Mao should be any less well-documented than the works of authors like Charles Dickens, which were pirated in the USA and are long out of copyright.  Sales and printing are both grounded in particular technologies and modes of business.  What about library loans?  What about digital downloads?  We have many lists of books and it seems clear that the total size of the print run is a notable way of doing this.  The list should therefore be kept in some form per 
— user:Andrew, 18:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CFORK||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:Content forking)