Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmett Rensin
the subject meets , which requires "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject", by virtue of the three articles about his 2016 Twitter controversy cited in the article. A better argument for deletion would rest on  and , but in this case neither applies since—as I've now edited the article to make clear—Rensin was the author of a 2009 book that itself received significant coverage in reliable sources, and so meets not only  but also . &ndash;&nbsp
— User:Arms, 23:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)