Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deirdre M. Condit
Above is again an argument on the basis that the subject is a "sought after pundit". This ''can'' satisfy GNG, but here it seems that it's mostly limited to local outlets and TV stations, for example the student-reported story on local affiliate channel 6 and all the other local sources that SusunW furnished &ndash; "local" is not the fodder for GNG, otherwise ''most'' academics would be notable. Also, most commentators seem to be unaware that some institutions have a rotation system for chairs and this tends to happen more in non-science departments. If this is true here (and I think it is a safe assumption), then this aspect adds no weight towards notability. Her citations are low and the SMS journal was founded in 2015, so editorship does not carry the weight of an established journal. I think the honest assessment here is that her trajectory is very promising, but that it is still , as SwisterTwister argued
— User:Agricola44, 15:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)