Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthea
It must be really, really frustrating for the editors, having worked to get a new page through  successfully, to have it immediately put  forward for deletion. But I'm  really sorry, I don't yet see this quite meeting . Maybe it is  for this product. On Google News, all  I can find is articles about Synthea, the robot sex doll! Some good medical journal articles reviewing it might have cemented it.  I see no reason why the editor shouldn't take a copy back to their sandbox to retain to be worked on for later. Any editing should aim to shorten the article and keep it factual,  and less promotional in tone. I should also comment that I learnt more about what Synthea offers from the references than from the over-complex Wikipedia article. Sometimes less is more
— User:Nick, 00:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AFC||WP:NSOFT||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Articles for creation)