Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coat of arms of the London Borough of Haringey
regarding  and my argument above: my point was that if we decide this is notable, then it makes sense for it to be its own article, rather than merging to the article for the borough. That would contribute to making the page quite large, and it would likely be broken out again eventually anyway, so keep per . I didn't at all mean to argue "keep because other stuff exists" but I see how it sounded like that. As for the sources, this isn't my area of expertise by any means but it seems that the authoritative sources on heraldry are ones that are not kept online. They exist but someone's going to have to go find them. The projects like http://www.civicheraldry.co.uk Civic Heraldry UK and http://www.ngw.nl Heraldry of the World are ones which are trying to compile that info online; they are self-published but may be nonetheless authoritative on this topic. Problem is they don't cite their sources. Someone in Wikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology|the Heraldry project might be able to help with better ones. Anyway, it seems like the references that are there are enough for a weak keep
— User:Ivanvector, 16:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OSE||WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)