Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branislav Tošić
This article, post-|HEY, is very good given the available sourcing, showcasing SF's talents as an editor and writer. I agree it meets  and is well-written. I'd love to change my !vote to "Keep because SF put time into this and did a good job." But, alas, for me to do so would be . Notability of a subject is independent from quality of an article; just like a poorly-written article should be kept if the subject is notable, a well-written article should still be deleted if the subject is not notable. And it's not just a matter of taking the notability ''guideline'' and imposing it like a strict rule; I think there is a very good reason to delete this article:{{pb}}This article gets less than one page view per day: 190 page views from Jan–Aug 2019; Sep 1 is the 244th day of the year https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2019-01-01&end=2019-09-01&pages=Branislav_Tošić. It is not of interest to readers of enwiki. (Also, it's further evidence that "#-of-apps-in-an-FPL" is not a good way to predict notability.) Every page requires editor-hours to build and maintain, and our limited editor-hours are better spent on article subjects that are of interest to readers. There are, no doubt, many other Serbian football players who readers ''are'' interested in, and we should free up our resources to focus on ''those'' articles, instead of this one
— User:Levivich, 00:19, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:HEY||WP:V||WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)