Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NedaNet
but improve sourcing. It should be noted that reportorial blogs on the newspaper's own website '''are''' in fact considered |reliable sources. These are not some random bloggers. Links to Raymond's website are to document his claims; the veracity of said claims is for the reader to decide. This discussion seems to be dominated by dislike for ESR, which I read as a form of . I'm not going to assume there is any political agenda here, but I'm seeing a lot of unfamiliar names in this AfD compared to most AfDs I've participated in
— User:Orangemike, 12:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: :WP:RS||:WP:DONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)