Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lydian augmented scale
and attempt to draw a consensus there as to its inclusion, but '''delete if lacking other options'''. As a derivative and without a current source that suggests any substantive use it falls to the philosophy behind a combination of  and . This reads as a textbook entry with minimal context and lack of secondary sources to suggest any notability. Citations that merely state "this exists"--From only one instructional source, no lesshttp://www.amazon.com/Jazz-Guitar-Beyond-Century-Method/dp/0757982816, and the author himself lacking notability via a Wikipedia entry and minimal search impact--Is simply not enough. I won't claim a specialty in this area, which is another reason I suggest a redirect so we don't necessarily have to lose this content via future diffs but it can be evaluated more appropriately via a talk page
— User:Tstormcandy, 08:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:MANUAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)