Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Bachmann
The sources are about him, there is no doubt about that. On the other hand, the sources most likely would not have written about him if his wife wasn't trying to become President. It's not our job, however, to judge ''why'' reliable sources cover a subject and even if we can assume why they do so, we still cannot let the reason for the coverage influence the fact that there ''is'' sufficient coverage. If it turns out later that his notability was strictly temporary, we can still delete it then but currently the article meets |the relevant notability guideline, so there is no reason to delete it. If some editors want to use it for personal agendas, then it's our job to stop them and strive for a NPOV article but such (perceived) agendas are not a reason to delete an article. Regards
— User:SoWhy, 17:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)