Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Rappaport
looks to be a likely  failure, as the sources cited are not in-depth enough to establish the subject's notability. More could always exist, but the comments above seem to imply most of the coverage about Rappaport could be seen as being more closely linked to other, more notable artists. In addition to these points, the article is being used to promote the subject, and thus has been created and maintained in contradiction to 
— User:SamHolt6, 00:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NARTIST||WP:NOTADVOCACY (Wikipedia:Notability)