Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Creswell
My goodness, what an unfortunate situation this AfD is. I spent quite a bit of time sorting through the many references proffered here and in the article, all the negative commentary here, and all the rest of it. After that, I must conclude that Creswell does not actually pass  or . He seems like a very interesting individual, though. My evaluation is that the sources can be summarized as 1) |primary sources (interviews are primary sources, as are libertarian party sources, and his own websites), 2) passing mentions, or 3) not mentioning the article subject at all. The government sources are also not comprehensive coverage. Wikipedia articles are summaries of what reliable and independent sources say ''about'' a subject, not what a subject says (or their close associates say) about themselves. If there isn't reliable and comprehensive independent coverage available, then there simply isn't content available to write an ''encyclopedic'' article. What is there now is a summary of what he says about himself, and his political viewpoints and a |synthesis of what primary sources and non-comprehensive coverage says. With respect to the Five Pillars, this article fails both  and 
— User:Waggie, 02:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SYNTH||WP:5P1||WP:5P2 (Wikipedia:Notability)