Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smirting (2nd nomination)
I just finished sourcing the article with multiple |reliable sources that establish "smirting" as a |notable phenomenon.  The sources have in-depth (significant to exclusive) coverage of the phenomenon and term, rather than simply using the term "smirting".  I added eleven sources (The Guardian, BBC, Chicago Tribune, Daily Mail, a couple of books, etc). If you want more, there are plenty to be had on http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=smirting&cf=all Gnews, http://books.google.com/books?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=smirting&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np Gbooks, and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=smirting&cf=all&sa=N&tab=ps Gscholar. I would also add that TEMP|notabilty is not temporary. —&nbsp
— User:LinguistAtLarge, 17:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NTEMP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)