Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resignation of Shirley Sherrod
I suggest waiting until early August before making a decision, to see what happens and where the controversy goes. For example, there are now reports (http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/20/usda-reconsiders-employee-ouster-over-race-remarks/print/ example) that the USDA may reemploy Ms Sherrod. Once things settle down, we can work out whether we should have a BLP about Ms Sherrod (very unlikely, IMO), rename this article to (say) "the Sherrod controversy" or merge it (preferably shortened) into some other article. (As an interim measure, we have a United States Department of Agriculture#Shirley Sherrod|section about Ms S in the USDA article.)As things stand, the reasoning behind the BLP1E rule and  are both good arguments for deleting the article. We should only keep it (possibly under a different name) if something changes. But I think the end of this AfD will be too soon to decide on that
— [[User talk:Chris Chittleborough|CWC]], 13:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)