Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermann Leiningen (2nd nomination)
per Bearcat; in particular agreement with this part of his argument {{tq|the ''Canadian Jewish News'' hits aren't "covering" him in the context of doing anything noteworthy, either}}, to which I would add: the piece is obviously about the story of saving the Jews, and the information on the subject is a pretext to create a reason to retell the actual story, i.e. trivia to catch your attention. The https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/hermann-leiningen-profile-canadian-with-royal-blood The Canadian who would be king article on the other hand is about daily life with the historical tidbits acting as trivia. There is something trivially interesting and eye-catching in all of this, but there is a serious reason not to maintain the article which is . Plus all the other more prosaic arguments consistently put forward by other delete proponents (such as  and ), and not refuted. For example I find the counter of {{tq|nobility inherently derives notability from inheritance}} to be an explicit negation of an obvious result of adding NOTGENEALOGY and NOTINHERITED together, and therefore completely invalid
— User:Alalch, 23:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTGENEALOGY||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)