Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Havoc & The Hurricanes (2nd nomination)
With all due respect, Karl, shut up about COI/COPYVIO; it prefaces every single argument you make, it has nothing to do with the content, and it hs nothing to do with whether the article should be kept or not.  I made that comment in response to the state of the article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_Havoc_%26_The_Hurricanes&oldid=718711134 here, which was unsourced and had not been substantially changed from its creation by an https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Andru0711 SPA a year previous.  So where did the information come from if I couldn't find a source for it?  Either another source that wasn't cited, or someone who had inside information.  You never showed otherwise; you only screamed (repeatedly) that I was wrong. So I'm tired of you constantly claiming that the article should be kept because "COI/COPYVIO wasn't proven."  '''The article was nominated for not meeting .'''  You had several weeks (your "period of time") to "prove" the group met NBAND, and they have not.  The policy specifically prohibits usage of the types of sources you have used as indicators of notability, and I told you that in the last AfD, but you went ahead and filled the article with inappropriate material anyway. As an example, you cited an ''award'' to a ''concert flyer''.  Moreover, your opinion of the band is irrelevant - '''if you cannot show it by acceptable sources, your opinion on a subject does not matter
— User:MSJapan, 17:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NBAND (Wikipedia:Notability)