Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dex Lauper
Notability is , so he's not automatically entitled to an article just because he has famous parents — but nothing claimed or sourced here gets him over  as having attained notability in his own right yet. A lot of the sources here just briefly mention his name in coverage of Cyndi rather than being about him — and the ones that ''are'' about him are a mix of |unreliable sources (Perez Hilton's blog), non-substantive blurbs and |reference-bombed repetitions of the exact same article in its original source ''and'' followup reprints in aggregators (see #10-12, which are all the same article in three different reprints, and thus not three distinct sources.) No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he actually passes NMUSIC for something, but nothing written or sourced here gets him an article today
— User:Bearcat, 17:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NMUSIC||WP:RS||WP:REFBOMB (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)