Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moxie Raia (2nd nomination)
Of Valoem's set of four links above, the first two give only passing mentions in articles about Steve Aoki, and the fourth is a passing mention in a  local event listing. This is the case with most of the references in the article. Where I hesitate is over the way the a couple of the articles that have any focus on her (such as http://www.directlyrics.com/introducing-moxie-raia-exclusive-interview-talks-the-brain-house-buffalo-bill-upcoming-ep-news.html Valoem's third reference) comment on how "she is about to become the 'next big thing' in music". Can we say someone is notable for being "about to be notable"? I thought http://line-mag.com/issue-no-2-articles/ this reference from the article was useful, insofar as it presupposes that the websites readers know who she is and would be interested in knowing what she tells us about herself. And then there's http://anthemmagazine.com/this-girls-got-moxie-2/ this full-on interview. In total, I've seen three or four sources that I feel qualify, but is that enough? So let's say this article wasn't posted until five years from now, and nothing more had been published about her in the interim. From that perspective I wouldn't feel that she hadn't attain notability, not just because her coverage was brief but because it was shallow, unlike the coverage of, say, flash-in-the-pan William Hung. So I'm leaning toward , even while feeling it might not take much to tip her over to the other side
— User:Largoplazo, 14:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ROUTINE||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)