Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StationRipper (2nd nomination)
without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do better than this. The inclusion standard for software is not anybody's presumption about how well-known it is, or where it ranks in a Google search — the inclusion standard for software is being the subject of enough |reliable source coverage to clear . But Slashdot and p2pnet are both |blogs, not reliable sources for establishing the notability of anything, and StationRipper is just namechecked in, not the ''subject'' of, the only two references here that are reliable sources. When trying to establish notability, what we're looking for is ''dedicated'' coverage ''about'' the thing in ''media'', not blog posts or its name getting mentioned in coverage about other things
— User:Bearcat, 14:32, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BLOGS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)