Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two envelopes problem/sources
but either '''merge''' into Two envelopes problem#Further reading or '''rename''' to something like List of articles and books discussing the two-envelope paradox. Notwithstanding , the two-envelope paradox is special in that, in spite of a vigorous debate, nothing resembling consensus as to how to resolve the paradox has emerged in the scientific community. Even the papers that purport to give an overview of the arguments give spotty coverage, and our Wikipedia article is no exception. The list would be more useful if it was annotated, but I realize that requires a tremendous effort. As far as I'm concerned it can be culled somewhat by removing unpublished or self-published sources. &nbsp
— [[User talk:Lambiam|Lambiam]], 17:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LINKFARM (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)