Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sourcery
Despite the |WP:INHERITED- and -type arguments made by some of the "snow(ball) keep" !votes above (the claim, for instance, that a book about Pratchett and philosophy probably includes some coverage of this book in particular is laughable, and Oakshade's jab at the nominator borders on NPA-violation), I find it incredibly hard to believe that enough coverage in reliable secondary sources doesn't exist to write a decent article on an early entry in the Discworld series
— User:Hijiri88, 03:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)