Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninjutsu (Naruto) (second nomination)
I hate to turn into a raving inclusionist on this one, but the article is |verifiable by |reliable sources - the specific anime and manga (on the other hand, those are primary sources).    The overall subject (Naruto) is clearly notable, so we're really dealing with a question of how much specificity should the Naruto Wikipedia:Article series|article series contain.  The closest thing to a relevant guideline, Wikipedia:Notability_(fiction)#Fiction_in_Wikipedia|Notability (fiction) states ''Minor characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be merged with short descriptions into a "List of characters." This list should reside in the article relating to the work itself, unless either becomes long, in which case a separate article for the list is good practice.''  This article is well written given the subject matter, meets the core policies, and seems to be dead on with the relevant section of Notability (fiction).  Ultimately, I say keep.  With respect, other than the argument that it's primary sourced, which is not grounds for deletion, the main deletion argument looks a lot like some flavor of IDONTLIKEIT to me
— User:TheronJ, 21:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)