Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Herron (2nd nomination)
Available sourceshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Tyler+Herron%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=ahttp://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tyler%20Herron%22%20source%3A%22-newswire%22%20source%3A%22-wire%22%20source%3A%22-presswire%22%20source%3A%22-PR%22%20source%3A%22-release%22%20source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=np would seem to |indicate that this stub is expandable and improvable. SO... just how much coverage in independent reliable sources is considered |enough coverage for an indivual, one whom might otherwise only tickle at , to be seen as being |worthy of note through that http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Tyler+Herron%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a years-long coverage and contribution to the enduring record? Re-stated: When does  over-rule 
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 03:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POTENTIAL||WP:GNG||WP:ATH||WP:N (Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state)