Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/66 Months
per meeting .  Under the film's long title, |numerous sources were found discussing the film directly and in detail: http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/10203568.Film_maker___s_death____big_loss_to_industry___/ ''Oxford Times'', http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/9932184.Documentary_film_focuses_on_six_years_without_care/ ''The Argus'', http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/9506544.Film_maker_revisits_homeless_roots/ ''Oxford Mail'' (1), http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/10203568.Film_maker___s_death____big_loss_to_industry___/ ''Oxford Mail'' (2) and http://www.bicesteradvertiser.net/news/bicester/9932184.display/ ''Bicester Advertiser'' allowing the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=66_Months&type=revision&diff=703367106&oldid=703366576 nominated poor stub to be easily https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=66_Months&type=revision&diff=703386972&oldid=703366576 '''expanded and improved'''. There are https://www.google.com/search?q=%2266+Months+under+the+Radar%22&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjc4sCh99_KAhUX9GMKHUCEDcQQ_AUIBigA&biw=1024&bih=713&dpr=1.25 more, but we already have enough to show  and  met. {{checkmark
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 05:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:NPOSSIBLE||WP:BURDEN (Wikipedia:Notability)