Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kissmetrics
as clearly meeting . Saying a source is a PR does not make it so, the same with saying journalists are not honest or have a conflict of interest, these judgments should be demonstrated in order to be taken into a minimal account. And even dismissing some weaker sources such as the ''VentureBeat'' and ''TechCrunch'' articles, the concerns about the two John Wiley & Sons books and the ''MediaPost'' and ''Wired'' articles are particularly weak and very unlikely, if not odd (I never heard that a book being a bestseller means it being unreliable, nor I have never seen press releases opening about lawsuits against the companies they should promote). There is enough news and book coverage https://www.google.it/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=Kissmetrics&gws_rd=cr&ei=DZLvV-SQLIKAUbjeoNAG, particularly in ''The Lean Entrepreneur: How Visionaries Create Products, Innovate with New Ventures, and Disrupt Markets'' by Brant Cooper and Patrick Vlaskovits, to have a neutral and accurate article
— User:Cavarrone, 10:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)