Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lüftner Cruises
None of the Keep !voters have based their arguments on the correct guideline, , which has a stricter interpretation of requirements for establishing notability than vanilla GNG.  is not appropriate here and neither  nor  make sense unless the !voter suggests an alternative to deletion. !votes which rely on reasons such as "sourcing seem fine", "passes GNG", "I think notabilty has been established" and "A cruise line that operates sixteen vessels would seem to be notable by any definition of common sense" should be discounted.  requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria as per the breakdown above. They are either standard business listings or short articles based on an "announcement" by the company - all of the articles I can find are within the company's echo chamber and I have been unable to find any "Independent Content" as per ORGIND. Topic fails 
— User:HighKing, 10:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:BASIC||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)