Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jellyrox
for all the wall of text, retention is still only supported by the article's creator. Not sure why this has been relisted again. The arguments for deletion are policy-based while the arguments for keeping this seem to return to the same misinterpretations of policy. I'm not trying to insult the article's creator but dragging this out is becoming colosseum-esque. The great irony is that we're probably only a couple of good sources away from |notability and spending time ''making'' the subject notable away from WP (rather than spending time on WP arguing that it is already) would be a much better use of your time. Work on getting the subject some good coverage in a couple of magazines and you can dispense with all of the above. There's a very good chance this could |be notable in the future - go and make it so
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 12:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)