Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donny Long (2nd nomination)
After considering this for over 3 quarters of a hour, I've decided to support deletion. The main reason I'm voting in favor of delete is |there appears to be no verviable sources. I've done a Google search on the topic, and all I could really see is blogs and Facebook etc. This would lead to |doubts to whether this article would meet the notabillity clause. Yes, |the noteabillity clause on this topic seems to have been met, but I'd involke |ignore all rules, because this article has caused mass conflict between it's subject and editors. I'd also support salting just to prevent recreation, given these circumstances. I am not a expert of the subject, just looking at google and what's been said on wiki, but there was enough for me to come to some conclusion
— User:Sk8er5000, 10:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOTE||WP:PORNBIO||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)