Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipnarine Maharaj
The sources look like local news articles and other similar-quality publications that do not convince me of a pass of . And comparing his cites (100, 61, 51, etc on Google scholar) to the top-cited papers in stem cell transplant research (1115, 713, etc) makes the claim in the article that he's a leading expert in this area seem overblown
— User:David, 17:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)