Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canonical gospels
Not all s are bad by definition.  I think the key question is whether Gospel#Canonical gospels merits a  to discuss the canonical gospels as a group in more detail than was done in the parent article.  If the answer to that question is "yes" then the article should be retained.  Content can always be improved by more sources, more NPOV, better writing, etc.  The principal issue here seems to be the organization of the content in a hierarchy: Gospels --> Canonical Gospels --> Matthew/Mark/Luke/John individually
— User:Ignocrates, 21:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CFORK||WP:SPINOFF (Wikipedia:Content forking)