Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hang Yin
I restored this article as it had been PRODed without discussion. While I agree that the article subject's citation record is impressive, this does not establish notability. Criterion 1 of , I would argue, requires more than a list. Of the sources referenced in the article, the majority are not independent of the subject. Those that are independent are little more than trivial coverage. Of course, being named in a Nature news piece is impressive, but it does not establish notability. My main concern with this article is one of . The article has clearly been placed on Wikipedia as a promotional piece by either the subject or people close to him. These people are the same s that are arguing to keep above
— User:Catfish, 09:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:SPIP||WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Notability)