Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Joko Widodo
Criticism of a head of state is a perfectly valid reason for an article and highly notable, and not a BLP violation if it's inline with valid sources. Plenty of sources in English media.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/04/joko-widodo-how-indonesias-obama-failed-to-live-up-to-the-hypehttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-13/jokowi-defends-corruption-law-changes-criticized-by-right-groupshttps://www.dw.com/en/opinion-joko-widodos-last-chance-to-fulfill-his-promises-to-indonesia/a-48371002https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/02/12/with-friends-like-these-indonesia-jokowi-joko-widodo/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/20/world/asia/indonesia-president-inauguration-protest.html We have similar articles on other world leaders. Obviously the article needs to be free from conspiracy theories and only based on criticism from ''reliable sources'', including respected human rights groups, and so the neutrality of the article should be addressed. The article is extremely detailed and extensive, so I don't see the point of . Just remove any unsubstantiated content
— User:Wikimandia, 07:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)