Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Mahlon Davis
The article is not sourced well enough to get him over  — it's far too dependent on primary sources and blogs, with not nearly enough evidence of real media coverage — and claims nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to get over GNG. Just listing a bunch of books as a "bibliography" section separately from the references, without footnoting any of the body content ''to'' those books to provide some concrete ''evidence'' of how ''much'' the books do or don't actually ''say'' about the subject, is not dropping the mic on a notability question
— User:Bearcat, 16:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)