Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Woolgar
First, the nom violates , and ironically the thing the nom never heard of was linked to. You could have just read through that article to familiarize yourself with the subject. I think the nomination should be reworded. As for the article, the person seems notable enough, but major expansion is necessary. Maybe something like the man's accomplishments in the realm of chessboxing and beyond would be good. Notability should be asserted more
— User:AcroX, 00:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTKNOWIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)