Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archaeoporn
As neo as a ~logism can be.  Regarding the comment above, it is true that this does not appear to meet any specific articles for speedy deletion, but an administrator can (and should, in my view) speedily close this debate because, as stated in , "If an issue doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of getting an unexpected outcome from a certain process, then there is no need to run it through that process." I think that any editor other than maybe the author voting to "keep" this despite it's undeniable status as a recently created term for any policy-based reason is a remote possibility beyond any reasonable expectation
— User:Zahakiel, 15:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)