Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Availability, salience and vividness
agree with nom, Wikipedia is |not a dictionary, nor are articles meant to about collections of terms, especially when they are weakly or doubtfully related. If they are important in social psychology then they may form part of a brief discussion there, suitably cited. As this stands, there's nothing worth merging
— User:Chiswick, 12:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTDICT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)