Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lex Coleman
It ''is'' interesting |original research, but I don't see how "Lex" passes  just yet. Perhaps someone will follow up and produce a reliable source; then we can have a "Lex" article, or put the "Lex" material into the "Lester" article, whatever is supported by the sources
— User:Studerby, 18:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:N (Wikipedia:No original research)