Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Widelands
Another article that cannot provide |reliable sources to |verify any claims of |notability. And as has been demonstrated by two other editors, search engine results are just as unreliable a reason for keeping as they are for deleting, unless they can be supported. Instead of saying 'We should keep this because it's in development but still has 250 Ghits', how about actually provoding a couple of those 250 websites that are |reliable sources
— User:DarkSaber2k, 08:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:WEB||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)