Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smuxi
even if somewhat weakly. Covered in Tom's Hardware, at more length in TuxRadar, which is an online publication owned by Linux Format, and also in the print issue of that magazine http://www.linuxformat.co.uk/archives?issue=116. All of these sources were present in the article at the time of nomination. Granted, being reviewed in an article on more obscure apps (TuxRadar) is surely not an indication of popularity or importance. I find it ironic, but not surprising however, that the hardcore deletionists when presented with arguments that something is important, immediately argue that |notability is all that matters, and when presented with significant coverage in , they argue that the topic is simply not notable (as in popular or important) because it is discussed at some length among other not well-known topics. Besides, if the round-up in Tom's Hardware was as indiscriminate as some say, we'd be able to reference any IRC software on this site from it, including the whole Comparison of IRC clients. Clearly that's not the case given the number of IRC clients that got deleted
— User:Pohta, 03:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)