Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiyo Miyako (2nd nomination)
I have only been active in Wikipedia for a very short time, and I am already very tired of being bombarded with AfDs for supercentenarians. It is possible to show that some have received significant, sustained coverage in reliable sources, while others have not (and therefore that some meet  and some don't). It does not seem to me that the nominators of these AfDs do much , and the rate at which these articles are being nominated makes it very difficult to research each to determine whether there is other information and other sources which have not yet been included in the articles. Some of the "keep" articles may not be policy-based, but many of the "delete" arguments are based on the quality of the article as it stands, and the fact that there is no notability guideline on extreme age, rather than assessing whether "many sources exist, but simply have not been included yet." 
— User:RebeccaGreen, 16:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:PAGEDECIDE (Wikipedia:Notability)