Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiquote (2nd nomination)
I can only assume {{U|Whjayg}}/Jay is referring to the relisting admin ... who I have noted on many AfD's providing helpful comments to the discussion on relist ... often displaying great insight into Wikipedia policies and guidelines.  It's pointless racking up loads of sources that won't pass  but we now have on the article (Woods & Theony 2011)''("Dummies")''; (Buscaldi & Rosso, 2007) and (Chorowski et al,2008) with (Rickson, 2013) also fairly tempting for .  For  (Buscaldi & Rosso, 2007) and (Chorowski et al,2008) both use a lot of web content while there are many examples of Wikiquote being used for the source of things; and while not the example I was looking for this whole article from the Independent (url-access=limited) seems somewhat reliant on misquotes from Wikiquote  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-top-ten-misquotations-8611230.html for example
— User:Djm, 19:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:WEBCRIT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)