Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invincible Snowfields
and expand a bit. This is a notable subject. (1) Notability is preferably determined by the quality of the source(s), not the quantity. The Wikipedia:Notability guideline does not ''require'' multiple sources. An independent review in the SKImag means a lot in terms of notability precisely because this is such a small operation. (2) The entries in the various lists may have been written by or based on material from the skifield itself, but not all of them are ads. In fact inclusion in such lists & travel org catalogs also has fact/quality checking aspects. Example: if a skifield does not live up to its description, it would be removed from the list before long. Therefore they can be used to confirm the quality of the SKImag review. (3) If other editors would want to keep the article but (unlike me) feel that a policy or guideline stands in the way, a consensus to |ignore the rule(s) may be in the cards
— User:Avb, 09:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)