Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Quintana (2nd nomination)
not notable. He ''might'' meet , which says that people with "significant coverage in reliable sources" are "''presumed'' to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article", but note my italics. The coverage may not count as "significant" either, as GNG defines it. I don't see how a handful of court cases (restraining orders, a lawsuit and http://articles.latimes.com/1998/jan/31/local/me-13986 an assault conviction) are enough for notability. And it's clear, as has already been noted, that the court actions are his only possible route to notability. His work in film is sub-notable, as are his several unsuccessful forays into politics. This is a longstanding nuisance entry with frequent sock attacks and article ownership issues
— User:Hairhorn, 03:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)