Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comprehensive study of aging and free radicals
Pretty clear POV essay. The very fact that it's titled "Comprehensive study" suggests that this is an original synthesis of information and violates . (Wow, talk about an unnecessarily overly wikilinked article, too.) The platinum nanoparticle article is a bit more difficult, but on the balance, I think it should be deleted. The article is definitely fringe-oriented. None of the more outlandish claims are sourced. In fact, it looks to me like only the trivial claims in that article have sources. There are decent nanoparticle articles out there, like gold nanoparticles, but there isn't much in this article worth salvaging
— User:Eaolson, 19:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)