Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bionicle Super Chapter Books
This is the last book series covering events in the 1st Generation Bionicle Universe. It is every bit as notable as Bionicle Chronicles, Bionicle Legends, and other similar book series. This is especially true since this series involves the last Bionicle film, and because it also describes the conclusion of the 1st Bionicle storyline. For articles that describe books like this one, there usually aren't that many outside sources that ''can'' be cited; the only places where sourcing would actually be needed are for any claims in the article that would need a reliable source for verification. (The blogs are reliable enough for use because they often get their information from the Bionicle author himself, or from the LEGO technical team.) This article has relatively few of those claims, and nearly all of them have been sourced. As a number of users have told me in the past, most Wikipedia article content in general is unsourced (and much of said content is ), that being said, there's no reason to delete the article outright just because it has a few sourcing issues or some write-up issues. If we deleted articles every time they had serious sourcing or coverage issues, most of the articles on Wikipedia would have been deleted a long time ago. If there's an issue, ''it should be fixed'', and other users should be brought in to help with such issues if needed instead of simply nominating such articles for deletion. Also, the perceived "lack of notability" is completely debatable, and actually depends on the readers' |point of view. That being said, opinion ''should not'' be a fact in this article's fate. Technically, this series is as notable as the other Bionicle book series (some of whose corresponding articles have worse sourcing problems than this one), so that in itself is enough to warrant the existence of this article. The reason why this series's ''name'' may not be so notable is because that name was never formally printed on the books, but this has no bearing on the notability of the ''content''. Instead of jumping the gun and putting up an article for deletion if it had tons of problems, those issues should be addressed and fixed. I have personally seen multiple other articles along the same subject line with similar issues in sourcing, write-up, and possibly other issues, why not delete them all? The only articles that actually ''should'' merit deletion are those that so broken up that they cannot possibly be repaired in any way (aside from pure vandalism or copyright issue article). None of Wikipedia's articles became perfect overnight, and most of them are far from Good-Article standards. Instead of reaching for the deletion gun, we should actually work to improve this article to meet Wikipedia's standards
— User:LightandDark2000, 04:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:POV (Wikipedia:No original research)