Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Ruck Keene
The article is heavily padded with non-independent sources of non-accomplishments, and I was not able to find anything better (such as heavy citations or in-depth news coverage of the subject) that would allow her to pass , , or . Sourcing is sparse enough that the newly-created article appears to have misstated her academic rank and affiliation — it says only she is associate lecturer at Exeter but she appears to also hold a position as senior lecturer at Oxford Brookes. (Or maybe is in the process of moving from one to the other.) Her precise rank is not directly a notability issue but the confusion over this issue demonstrates that proper sourcing is problematic here, and illustrates why we should not have articles in such cases
— User:David, 01:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)