Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Five (film)
as the person who prodded the article in the first place.   states two criteria for having their own article.  The first is that principal photography have been starting; I stipulate that this is in fact the case for the movie and is met.  The second criteria, however, is this: "Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."  This has not been met, in my opinion.  There are 6 references.  One is to IMDB, which generally does not qualify as a reliable source.  A second is a set of photographs on comingsoon.net; this certainly does not establish notability (it merely establishes existence).  A third source, also from comingsoon.net, indicates it is unreliable--note that the authors are "scoopers" (i.e., SPS) who are merely repeating what is in a PR newspaper.  The Variety source seems solid, the screenrant and collider sources possibly (I don't know enough about the industry to be certain these are reliable).  To me, this doesn't satisfy GNG--if it did, then pretty much any future film by a major company would qualify, and it seems to be that  is specifically trying to stop from happening.  The only grounds I can see for keeping are , if we want to logic that it seems more likely than not that this article will eventually need to be made, and thus taking it down just makes more work later
— User:Qwyrxian, 01:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFF||WP:NFF||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Notability)