Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Church of Google (3rd nomination)
Procedural Speedy Close - With a Keep AfD only three weeks ago, this is out of process and seems |pointy to me. It makes absolutely no sense that consensus would change in three weeks. Come back and renominate in three months, if you still think it should be deleted.  There was some discussion (I can't remember where, but I don't believe it made it to guideline status) that it would be a good idea that renominations should have a mandated minimum period before the renomination could take place to avoid this kind of issue and forum shopping. For this article, the closing rationale in the 2nd AfD was: ''The result was Keep. Both sides make good arguments here, but in the end, this does have sources and as as much of a "meme" as some of the other faux-religions that have articles on Wikipedia.'' To me, the delete arguments here and before seem to boil down in the main to . And that's not a valid reason to delete. In any case my !vote is '''Strong Keep''' per   and several keep arguments here and before, especially by DGG and LGRdC. It's a perfectly valid and encyclopedic article that can be cleaned up, as many articles can be and should be before being nominated for deletion, per  which says:  ''If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion
— User:Becksguy, 19:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:DP (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)