Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bone Breaker
Pardon me, but |being "weeks old" for an article not in violation of  or  is not a valid deletion argument.  And as Argentia|Argentinian sources exist allowing a rebuttable presumption|presumption toward |notability (they need not BE in the article), are we now not allowed, per |encouraged efforts to counter systemic bias, to even allow the least bit of |patience that an Argentinian Wikipedian might stumble upon this article in en.Wikipedia and then decide to improve it
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 01:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOEFFORT||WP:NOT||WP:BLP||WP:NF||WP:CSB||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)