Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SimpliVity
This is pretty obvious promotion for a non-notable company and should be deleted per . The company itself is not notable. If you carefully look at the sources, there is not one good in-depth trusted mainstream media source. All I see is the routine news published in a bunch of startup media. My problem with using these sources is that they often publish redressed press releases and I do not consider that independent per . The WSJ source is reliable but I cannot see if it is an in-depth source or if it is a routine news about funding. The Telegram and Gazette is a local source. That combined with the obvious socking is grounds enough to delete
— User:Lemongirl942, 06:01, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DEL14||WP:CORPIND (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)