Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age disparity in sexual relationships (2nd nomination)
Topic has encyclopedic value given the societal trends of the last 2 decades. The proponent's rationale that the article has been a mess for years is just a variant of the to-be-avoided  mentality and, thus, a non-reason. If there is riginal Research in the article the correct procedure to follow is to be  and fix it; going on a delete frenzy is not the way to deal with that. A review of the sourced citations shows that a serious attempt has been made to include an abundant variety of reliable sources. I further note that the WikiProject Sexuality has assigned "Medium" importance to this article,,, not bad. '''My name is
— User:Mercy11, 04:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RUBBISH||WP:O||WP:BOLD (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)