Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socionomics (2nd nomination)
or failing that, '''delete''' per . Some comments don't seem to appreciate that  and  are separate guiding principles, and that thickly annotated prose may still be original research&mdash;especially when the citations are only trivial mentions of a topic linked with |new synthesis. I'm also concerned about the problem Bob mentions above: allowing such recreations will encourage users to perpetually recreate articles on every contentious deletion in hopes of a different result
— User:Cool, 23:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:N||WP:OR||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)