Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Eckel
Reference books tend to get much higher citation counts than research papers, so I don't see the high cite count for "Thinking in Java" as being particularly conclusive re , and he doesn't have enough other high-citation publications to convince me of a pass of criterion 1. The more relevant standard for this sort of work would be the existence of multiple published reviews of the book — there's some of that (for instance a piece in The Register on the 4th ed.), but it still looks like a case of  to me
— User:David, 13:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Notability)