Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Miley
County board of supervisors is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees inclusion in Wikipedia, but this article is not actually demonstrating a reason to deem him more special than the norm. It certainly ''thinks'' it is, if you eyeball its length alone — but when you actually analyze the content, you notice that it's padded with a lot of trivia that isn't adding anything of noteworthy substance (an entire paragraph devoted just to the legal definition of "unincorporated community" has nothing whatsoever to do with making Miley notable, frex), and that it's referenced far, far too heavily to |primary sources that aren't support for notability at all. You have to plod all the way to footnote #24 (skip past #23, it's a |blog) just to get to the first real media outlet, and even that source isn't ''about'' Nate Miley, but merely namechecks his existence in the process of being ''about'' something ''else''. And just two more hits after that, you're back in primary source territory again. As always, the notability test for politicians does ''not'' hinge on the ability to use the city or county government's own self-published website as technical verification that the subject ''exists'' — it hinges on the depth and geographic range of his ''media'' coverage, and there's not nearly enough of that here to make him more notable than the norm for a not automatically notable role
— User:Bearcat, 05:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:BLOGS (Wikipedia:No original research)