Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masta wong
Unfortunately, New York Times and CNN has written about him, fairly extensively actually, as the primary subject in their articles, and it's not just a passing mention, so he gets by .  I'm not sure "esotericness" = "nonnotability" (just as "famous" != "notability").  See the essay
— User:Uncle_G, 01:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)