Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Tabernacle, New Jersey
per #1, no deletion rationale provided or proposed.  Whether or not it is currently sourced has nothing to do with whether it should be deleted (or merged, for that matter).  Per  and , it was a mistake to list this at AFD without trying (or even discussing) merger first (are AFD instructions not clear enough?).  There has been no talk page discussion for this article, nor at Talk:Tabernacle Township, New Jersey, nor was the sole creator of this article contacted except to notify him of this deletion discussion ''a day after the article was posted''.  That's absolutely not how things should be done here, and I can't help but wonder if that is representative of why Wikipedia is having trouble gaining new editors and retaining old ones.  If you see that an article about a seemingly viable topic needs further development, |help with that process by doing some research, writing, and editing, or even just merging; communicate some concerns or proposals to the contributor on their talk page; tag it for the attention of others who might be more interested or knowledgeable about it; '''or leave it alone''' so someone else can deal with it properly
— User:Postdlf, 17:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE||WP:SOFIXIT (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)