Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupy Ashland (3rd nomination)
I don't think the article meets the threshold for notability in that there isn't "Significant coverage"...and i base this against the Occupy Wall Street article. And in my looking at the article there appear to be only a handful of authors of the sources. It is surely a notable news story for the moment, but does that make it a notable enough subject for an independent article on Wikipedia. I don't believe so. There are too many Occupy article stubs that have no potential to grow past stub status and this article fails to even have a rating or importance or class. We may want to take in all the stray puppies we find, but eventually we know they have to be taken away and dealt with in one way or another. I would hope we could be humane about how we deal with these stubs but at some pint we are going to have to deal with them and I agree that time may be fast approaching. As stated it does not meet , and does not meet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NTEMP#Notability_is_not_temporary notability is not temporary. This just not worth keeping in my view
— User:Amadscientist, 06:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE (Wikipedia:Notability)