Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electracy
I don't understand why the fact that it is a "neologism" is such a problem.  "Blog" is a neologism but doesn't say that it is a neologism in the article.  Should we remove "Blog" because it is a neologism?  The article can easily be edited to remove the term neologism if that is the problem.  Finicky's comment is not invalidated because she makes the point that it is not |original research and it is |verifiable. Citations can be added to show that the term has been used by writers other than the author.  The entry itself cites a source published by a reliable publisher as well as other scholarly work mentioning the term.  For this reason, it is also "verifiable."  Do a google search on electracy and you get 22,000+ hits, demonstrating its broad usage
— User:Rsmyth, 15:20, 6 January 2007 (EST)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:VER (Wikipedia:No original research)