Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmörnen (2nd nomination)
or '''merge''' to Värmlands Filmförbund.  For a festival that's supposedly existed since 1978, I admit I find it shocking that there's so little information about this, though I did find http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&u=http://www.sr.se/Varmland/nyheter/artikel.asp%3Fartikel%3D3144585&ei=3U5GS9vhOdTT8QbO8_n0Ag&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=25&ved=0CHAQ7gEwGA&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Film%25C3%25B6rnen%2522%2B-%2522founded%2Bin%2B1978%2Bby%2BErik%2BFasth%2Band%2BKjell%2BBergstr%25C3%25B6m%2522%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN%26num%3D30 this and http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&u=http://www.nwt.se/noje/article587117.ece&ei=3U5GS9vhOdTT8QbO8_n0Ag&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=28&ved=0CHoQ7gEwGw&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Film%25C3%25B6rnen%2522%2B-%2522founded%2Bin%2B1978%2Bby%2BErik%2BFasth%2Band%2BKjell%2BBergstr%25C3%25B6m%2522%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN%26num%3D30 this in what appear to be reliable sources.  I must say I disagree with the nominator's comment in the previous discussion that "if notability isn't 'huge,' it shouldn't have an article."  That's not policy.  However, to the extent this festival can be considered a "product" of Värmlands Filmförbund,  implies that it "should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy."  That article's currently a stub with virtually no content, so a merge seems like the best course of action
— User:Glenfarclas, 21:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRODUCT (Wikipedia:Notability)