Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norton Canes services (2nd nomination)
on the basis of |WP is NOT a travel guide. However, I agree that these discussions may need to be handled individually. In particular, I am not finding that these articles meet the notability criteria of ''significant coverage'' in reliable secondary sources, but that must be discussed indivually. For instance, the article on Norton Canes services uses a reference to a BBC article. BBC is definitely a reliable and independent source. The article is ''about'' the subject (the service area), although I suspect the article is much more than a regurgitation of a company press release. There is another source given for this service area that says how many jobs are created by its existence--THIS is the type of ''encyclopedic'' data that is needed (in my mind) to make this article more than a "travel guide" entry. (However, these do not add up to ''significant'' coverage to me.) But these types of merits must be discussed for each individual article. Many of the articles in the list have no references at all, merely external links to travel guides that list and rate services. These should be deleted as there is no encyclopedic merit to these articles. I suggest merging into the article about the road or moving the articles to WikiTravel
— User:PennySpender1983, 14:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTTRAVEL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)