Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proto-Australoid
or '''Redirect''' to Australoid race. I think notability is a red herring, the entire article is  based on a 93 year old work of scientific racism, which justifies  in my book. There are Google Scholar hits, and some of them are recent-ish, but I wouldn't describe any of them as ''good sources''; lots of fringe Indian physical anthropology, some mentions in historical overviews that apparently haven't updated their references since the 1940s, maybe a handful of examples of mainstream anthropologists using it to refer to a morphometric/craniometric type (but these are very ). In theory we could have an article covering Proto-Australoid as a notable historic/fringe concept, but I doubt the sources are there. In any case, this isn't it. &ndash;&#8239
— User:Joe, 11:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:TNT||WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)