Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of short place names
Non-encyclopedic" is just another word for "|I don't like it."  If a comprehensive, online encyclopedia is not the place for a list of one-and two-lettered real places, then I don't know what is.  Places are inherently notable, and non-random lists of such would thus be |notable.  The nomination neither cites |direct policy, nor explains logically why it should be eliminated.  This is precisely the sort of thing our core constituency, students at high school and college, would need here, and is |commonly kept here by consensus.  '''Not sure''' about the second list, which is subjective
— User:Bearian, 19:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:N||WP:5P||WP:OUTCOMES (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)