Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinfest
Nominator is correct that things like the Salon and San Francisco Chronicle/Gate sources are trivial one sentence mentions and do not satisfy . Powers is incorrect in thinking that notability is inherited from something like the Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards. PC Mag coverage is pretty trivial, however this http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6696601.html Library Journal review and this http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/book-news/comics/article/45885-tatsuya-ishida-speaks-on-sinfest-jesus-and-fans.html Publishers Weekly source suggest this topic does have the significant coverage in multiple independent sources that we need. Article does need a major rewrite
— User:Rangoondispenser, 20:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Notability)