Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Jacobson
Concerning "Subject of significant coverage" listed in a "keep" above: Of the seven references on the article 5 are to the ''Boston Globe'' and one is the ''Telegram & Gazette''. Of the three provided sources, indicative of attempting to prove "Subject of significant coverage", all are to the Boston Globe. This means that there are actually only '''two sources''' that count towards WP:notability|'''notability'''. Of the three: The first is a mundane news report that "After 35 years, Jacobson set to retire", the second, is "Life after chennal 5 and that the subject has "whale-watched in Mexico, hiked in California's redwoods, and sailed in the British Virgin Islands. She's also learned to pilot her boyfriend's 34-foot power boat on trips to Key West, the Bahamas, and Palm Beach.", and the third: ''Split screen'' discusses that both Natalie and her husband and co-anchor for two decades were leaving the show----- and each other, as he had another job, maybe with a new co-anchor to marry? All I know is that possibly well-intentioned, these are run-of-the-mill mundane "stories" that to the world and even the region are not actually "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded", so would be |refbombing to make an article look more notable
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:REFBOMB (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)