Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Jeremijenko
This is not a vanity article, although a clean-up and better sourcing are certainly needed here. A fairly unusual career and I think notability can be established both per  and probably  as a notable artist/designer and engineer. TheGoogleNews results cited by the Busy Bee are quite impressive already:  157 hits, most with nontrivial coverage related to her  http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Natalie+Jeremijenko%22&um=1&sa=N&start=0 . GoogleScholar also returns a substantial number of hitshttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&um=1&q=%22Natalie%20Jeremijenko%22&sa=N&tab=ws as does GoogleBooks, which yields 132 hitshttp://books.google.com/books?tab=sp&sa=N&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&um=1&q=%22Natalie+Jeremijenko%22&sa=N. Several of them give detailed biographical coverage, such as this http://books.google.com/books?id=PG-yhOdZ61YC&pg=PA68&dq=%22Natalie+Jeremijenko%22&sig=qn9VIm6pdX9sZzA0gKpiRgh7Ldw, and this  http://books.google.com/books?id=FdmBwC8gBN8C&pg=RA1-PA185&dq=%22Natalie+Jeremijenko%22&sig=G9EOIa0ix-TRlvYUAfR835QlT_g, and where many more provide nontrivial coverage of her.  Salon.com had an in-depth feature article about her http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2006/06/22/natalie/. Other examples of in-depth coverage include a review in New York Times  http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E4DF1E31F931A1575AC0A9609C8B63&sec=&spon=. More than enough here to satisfy .  Suggest the nomination be withdrawn
— User:Nsk92, 23:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)