Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unji
I think this article should be '''protected''' because tones of people ignored the original article which redirected to undzhi   ( http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unji&oldid=281971856 ). I agree with your comment that this is kind of orginal research and nonsense. If this word is fit to Wikipedia policy, why korean wikipedia didn't have same article? If you can understand korean please look this article (http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%9A%B4%EC%A7%80 ) and its talk page, history page. Someone constantly try to put same content to korean wikipedia and it's constantly denied. I think somebody constantly are vandalizing about this word. Also, korean wikipedia user also think that '''Wikipedia is |not a dictionary.''' so it should be '''deleted
— User:Tigger10, 10:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DICTIONARY (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)