Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Martinez (2nd nomination)
largely per Bearcat:  is clearly not met, which leaves , but GNG requires in depth coverage of the article's subject within (ideally at least a handful of) reliable, independent sources.  The closest we have to in-depth coverage focused upon the proposed article's subject comes from the HuffPost article, and even that source contains merely a three sentence paragraph regarding Ms. Martinez.  Unfortunately, despite the fact that there are technically nearly a dozen citation in the article, collectively, the content within them that is directed to the subject does not meet the notability threshold, even when we aggregate them. Further, if this is the second time we have had to delete the article in three years, we may want to consider salting the title. That would be a shame, in that its possible this woman's profile could raise in the coming years, and then there will be hoops to be jumped through to get a (then justified) article into existence, but given there is a possibility that the subject's supporters may re-add the article again without meeting notability standards, it may be called for
— User:Snow, 07:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOLITICIAN||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)