Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concurrency (road)
I don't think the nom is challenging that the concept exists. The nominator makes a valid point. When you examine the sources, the first one uses the term "coincident" and the second uses the term "common section." None of the sources use the word "concurrent" or "concurrency." Doing a quick Google search turns up nothing which supports that the term "concurrency" is not a coloquialism. I'm inclined to support deletion. However, this may be an acceptable time to |ignore all rules. I believe this article is ?|a good change by common sense, and it improves the encyclopedia
— User:Hmich176, 09:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)