Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual Morality and the Law (2nd nomination)
I am a little surprised to see all the keep !votes here. I mean, seriously? How does this article pass ? The entire article is an original commentary on that interview. The article appears to have created an illusion of four distinct references; but, in reality it has only two. One is the transcription of that interview and the other is a book written by Foucault himself, none of which are secondary sources. The real question is not about censorship. It is about whether the topic is notable enough to warrant a separate Wikipedia entry or not, based on an analysis of the secondary sources that discusses the topic. That is not the case here. I even did a thorough search on Google to see if there were any other sources that covered the topic at length. Nothing significant comes up. A clear GNG fail
— User:Mosesheron, 22:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)