Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Locco
We have a rule about |reference bombing, wherein a person is made to seem as notable as possible by augmenting the ''number'' of sources without regard to the ''quality'' of them — but that's exactly bass ackward, because the ''quality'' of the references, not their number, is what determines whether a person passes GNG or not. The sources here are not solid or notability-supporting ones on the whole — there are far too many |primary sources and far too few |reliable ones — and none of what Gulfzero Charlie pointed out about Locco above constitutes notability at all. Founding a local swimming group is not a notability claim in and of itself, fighting the closure of a local recreational facility is not a notability claim in and of itself, standing up for what you believe in is not a notability claim in and of itself, and being mayor of an Australian suburb is not a notability claim in and of itself, if the sourcing available to actually support an article on any of those grounds is this poor
— User:Bearcat, 19:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:REFBOMB||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)