Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto
WoS shows 4 papers having a cumulative total of 1 citation - quite literally next to 0 impact. I think the "Journal of Cosmology issue" discussed above is somewhat relevant. For example, this journal is not indexed by WoS, the definitive source for physics-related archival journals, because it has not satisfied WoS' acceptance criteria (which include "impact"). It is not considered to be a mainstream physics journal. Conversely, there ''are'' mainstream journals that ''do'' cover similar topics, e.g. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. and Astrobiol. and it's plausible that had more of his work been in these journals, the citation numbers would be more favorable. I don't think the issue here is . We have lots of bios on fringy people. Rather, there's simply a glaring lack of sources/coverage that demonstrate notability of this person. Thanks
— User:Agricola44, 18:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)