Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is Genesis History? (2nd nomination)
This article clearly meets , and it has received a large amount of coverage from independent and reliable sources that are clearly "not directly associated with the topic", as the previous AfD found, such as the ''Arkansas Democrat-Gazette'' (the newspaper of record of Arkansas), ''Business Insider'', ''Orlando Sentinel'', ''The Christian Post'', ''World (magazine)|World'', and ''Newsmax''. All of these sources are either secular or do not take any position on creation/evolution, making them all undisputably independent of the film (as the last AfD also found) -- the nominator has a rather high standard for source "independence", as any other movie on a less controversial topic would pass an AfD with flying colors with that kind of coverage (and there are many existing movie articles with ''far less coverage'' on WP, as several editors pointed out last AfD). And contrary to what the nominator implies, sources ''don't'' have to say "this movie is false BS" to be considered independent. Regarding the sources from YEC organizations (along with the many reviews from other sources), they are '''reviews''' and were cited as such -- reviews are inherently opinion-based as they record someone's opinion of the movie. Let's remember that the YEC reviews were condensed in a ''single sentence'' that merely named the orgs and nothing else, and that some undisputably mainstream organizations, such as The BioLogos Foundation, whose founder and president Francis Collins was appointed NIH director under Obama, were cited with much more extensive coverage. Either way, we're only citing their opinions of the movie, rather than scientific info (remember, ''this is a movie, not a belief''), and  applies for these reviews, making them appropriate to cite. And while many of these organizations may have fringe beliefs, they are definitely not fringe by any cultural/clout definition. The article did not and does not rely on sources such as those, and rather relied upon independent sources such as what I listed above for the non-review/reaction info
— User:1990, 20:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFILM||WP:BIASEDSOURCES (Wikipedia:Notability)