Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) (3rd nomination)
I'm sort of sad to endorse deleting this given that work has gone into making it better, but I'd really rather see it go than stay.  My main objection to this, and all criticism pages, is that they are at best collections of troll-magnet |random facts and can be far, far worse.  I've said my piece on the article's talk page, and some of those concerns have been addressed, but I still think the concept for this article is, by nature, inappropriate for an encyclopedia.  I do believe that this is something that will have to be addressed with a formal version of  rather than on a case by case level, and my primary objection is that it is a criticism article, not to any of the specific current content
— User:Somedumbyankee, 01:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TRIVIA||WP:CRIT (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)