Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagger (zine) (2nd nomination)
u|RoySmith}} Isn't this a failure of  Criteria 1 (fails to advance any argument for deletion)? I feel like the only basis of this AfD is "an article was deleted and was recreated but because it is not G4 worthy it is going to AfD." Was  done to show that the new article still does not establish notability (I will assume it was under  but I still have to ask as it's not said at all)? Currently I have no opinion on this right now ({{u|Randykitty}} had very persuasive arguments on the 1st AfD to be honest) and will check back when I have time to for all these sources
— User:Jovanmilic97, 18:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SK||WP:BEFORE||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)