Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 (2nd nomination)
Disruptive pointy nomination. Nomination is based on their own personal judgment about the credibility of the pageant, not on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Nominator ignores multiple articles which go beyond a passing mention and  which could very well satisfy  when the nominator considers two mere mentions of a name to be enough to show notability http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FThambipillai_Thanalakshmi&diff=533986766&oldid=533935571. Nominator goes overboard !voting keep to the extent of saying keep per relister. Gives a reason of keep because sources show music?? Claims passing GNG when no reliable sources are provided. In the face of nominators excessive inclusionism this reeks of bad faith
— User:Duffbeerforme, 10:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)