Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Separation of money and state
It's true some (not all) austrian economists have argued in favor of separation, but they are not the only ones. Objectivists have hinted at it too (as you correctly mention, although Rand rather advocates a gold standard), but also electronic currency advocates, anarchists, or simply free-market commentators (e.g. http://www.econlib.org/library/Leggett/lgtDE3.html'''Leggett''', http://www.wepin.com/why/products/natf/natf.html'''Riegel''', http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmatonis/2012/10/04/bitcoin-prevents-monetary-tyranny'''Forbes''', etc.). The topic is adjacent to classical liberalism, monetary sovereignty, free banking, ... but it is equivalent to none of these. As per the notability argument I don't understand given the numerous reliable sources that exist (and more to come, I'm still going through other sources to cite them appropriately). I acknowledge it is a marginal claim, but notable nonetheless (over 60k Web http://www.google.ch/#hl=en&safe=off&tbo=d&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22separation+of+money+and+state%22&oq=%22separation+of+money+and+state%22&gs_l=hp.3..0i30.1017.4019.0.4163.31.26.0.0.0.0.220.4008.0j23j3.26.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.2.hp.ZpfvDbbUca8&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.41867550,d.Yms&fp=c45f5bf549e43f24&biw=1280&bih=638'''hits''' and over 100 book http://www.google.com/search?q=%22separation+of+money+and+state%22&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1&hl=EN'''hits''' on the exact sentence). Again I think  does not call for outright deletion
— User:Alfy32, 09:28, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IMPERFECT (Wikipedia:Editing policy)