Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of omnipotent fictional characters
without prejudice per much of the above, but in my mind primarily for redundancy and an inherently arbitrary design.  1) Redundancy: the majority of this list mirrors in miniature the existing articles Cosmic entities (Marvel Comics) and Cosmic entities (DC Comics), lists of characters of a certain type that at least ignore questions of level of power while still giving basic descriptions and links.  2) Arbritrary: the problem with almost all lists of this sort generally falls under the guidelines of #IINFO|indescriminate collections of information.  Peregrine Fisher does indeed have a valid point that wikipedia does not care if these characters are omnipotent or not, only whether it is possible to cite that they have been described as such.  However, this begs the question of whether one description of an adjective merits a list.  I doubt there would be much debate about an AfD for "List of Strong Fictional Characters" or "List of Generous Fictional Characters" regardless of the quality of citation.  As used, "Omnipotent" is simply a descriptive modifier, only of interest because it appears to be a larger and more impressive modifier than other adjectives.  I respect the work put into this list, but given the duplication of work of most of it, I can't bring myself to suggest keeping given that underlying problem
— User:Markeer, 14:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)