Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richter10
No sources found in https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Richter10%22+(site%3Aindianexpress.com+OR+site%3Anewindianexpress.com+OR+site%3Athehindu.com+OR+site%3Atimesofindia.com+OR+site%3Aindiapress.org+OR+site%3Ahindustantimes.com+OR+site%3Aindiatoday.intoday.in+OR+site%3Atribuneindia.com+OR+site%3Adeccanchronicle.com+OR+site%3Aoutlookindia.com+OR+site%3Aindianewsmagazine.com+OR+site%3Afrontline.in+OR+site%3Atehelka.com+OR+site%3Aforbesindia.com+OR+site%3Amasala.com+OR+site%3Asaindiamagazine.com+OR+site%3Afilmfare.com+OR+site%3Aglamsham.com)&rlz=1CAASUA_enUS604US605&oq=%22Richter10%22+(site%3Aindianexpress.com+OR+site%3Anewindianexpress.com+OR+site%3Athehindu.com+OR+site%3Atimesofindia.com+OR+site%3Aindiapress.org+OR+site%3Ahindustantimes.com+OR+site%3Aindiatoday.intoday.in+OR+site%3Atribuneindia.com+OR+site%3Adeccanchronicle.com+OR+site%3Aoutlookindia.com+OR+site%3Aindianewsmagazine.com+OR+site%3Afrontline.in+OR+site%3Atehelka.com+OR+site%3Aforbesindia.com+OR+site%3Amasala.com+OR+site%3Asaindiamagazine.com+OR+site%3Afilmfare.com+OR+site%3Aglamsham.com)&aqs=chrome..69i57.303j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 major Indian news publications, nor anything in the https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Richter10%22+(site%3Aindependent.co.uk+OR+site%3Atheguardian.com+OR+site%3Atelegraph.co.uk+OR+site%3Adailymail.co.uk+OR+site%3Athetimes.co.uk+OR+site%3Amirror.co.uk+OR+site%3Aexpress.co.uk+OR+site%3Athesun.co.uk+OR+site%3Aujnews.com+OR+site%3Atheweek.com+OR+site%3Amanchestereveningnews.co.uk+OR+site%3Athisislancashire.co.uk+OR+site%3Ametro.co.uk+OR+site%3Abirminghammail.co.uk+OR+site%3Ascotsman.com+OR+site%3Aheraldscotland.com+OR+site%3Awalesonline.co.uk)&rlz=1CAASUA_enUS604US605&oq=%22Richter10%22+(site%3Aindependent.co.uk+OR+site%3Atheguardian.com+OR+site%3Atelegraph.co.uk+OR+site%3Adailymail.co.uk+OR+site%3Athetimes.co.uk+OR+site%3Amirror.co.uk+OR+site%3Aexpress.co.uk+OR+site%3Athesun.co.uk+OR+site%3Aujnews.com+OR+site%3Atheweek.com+OR+site%3Amanchestereveningnews.co.uk+OR+site%3Athisislancashire.co.uk+OR+site%3Ametro.co.uk+OR+site%3Abirminghammail.co.uk+OR+site%3Ascotsman.com+OR+site%3Aheraldscotland.com+OR+site%3Awalesonline.co.uk)&aqs=chrome..69i57.614j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 British press, nothing in https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Richter10%22+(site%3Asciencemag.org+OR+site%3Anature.com+OR+site%3Asciencedirect.com+OR+site%3Ascientificamerican.com+OR+site%3Abio.biologists.org+OR+site%3Aconservationmagazine.org+OR+site%3Asciencedaily.com+OR+site%3Adiscovermagazine.com+OR+site%3Asciencenews.org+OR+site%3Anationalgeographic.com+OR+site%3Asci-news.com)&rlz=1CAASUA_enUS604US605&oq=%22Richter10%22+(site%3Asciencemag.org+OR+site%3Anature.com+OR+site%3Asciencedirect.com+OR+site%3Ascientificamerican.com+OR+site%3Abio.biologists.org+OR+site%3Aconservationmagazine.org+OR+site%3Asciencedaily.com+OR+site%3Adiscovermagazine.com+OR+site%3Asciencenews.org+OR+site%3Anationalgeographic.com+OR+site%3Asci-news.com)&aqs=chrome..69i57.318j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 general science publications. Not much http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Richter10 pageview stats either (my unofficial measure). Overall, subject does not meet the  as best as I can determine
— User:Tomwsulcer, 22:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)