Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Forster (geneticist)
for lack of a valid deletion rationale. The nominator's "promotional" nomination is a classic Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Arguments without arguments|argument without an argument: here it appears only to mean that we have an article that mentions the accomplishments of its subject; by referring to the motivation for the article and not to its content it is an ad-hominem argument and vioaltes ; and it fails to refer to  or any other notability guideline. In any case the subject clearly passes #C1 (highly cited pubs with the top one being cited 3500+ times on Google scholar) and #C3 (member Leopoldina
— User:David, 04:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)