Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Holland
But for the citation in ''Business Week'', I'd say "delete". However, that is one small reference in ''one'' publication, and this person was not the main topic of the article - he was one of 25. If this person garners more media attention and better meets  in the future, no prejudice against recreation
— User:Agent, 21:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)