Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous (group)
As per , especially in light of recent events.  If it fails to pass  however, I believe it still improves Wikipedia through inclusion.  As far as I know there has never been a reliable source to find unbiased information about Anonymous.  Thus, even if it fails other policies as mentioned in delete comments above, it qualifies under .  I for one have felt that we needed an article on Anonymous since before Project Chanology began
— User:Scetoaux, 00:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Notability)