Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BC Biermann
per  and UPE/SPI concerns.  Having gone through the refs and google search, there is very little good RS on this subject, and nothing in the way of a quality RS with .  Most refs are either not WP quality to assess an artist BLP and/or not independent of the subject (e.g Heavy Projects).  I find passing mentions in books on "Augmented Reality Art" like https://books.google.ie/books?id=WQV0AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&dq=bc+biermann&source=bl&ots=b9AqHdozUn&sig=ACfU3U0o3XFDUvesLK96EAajqyZkfrqHiw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjN3s-jxODmAhWvShUIHU9TBcM4ChDoATAFegQICxAB#v=onepage&q=bc%20biermann&f=false this, and https://books.google.ie/books?id=eMJNDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA160&dq=bc+biermann&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZjojKxODmAhVdUBUIHaOdC6oQ6AEIMTAB#v=onepage&q=bc%20biermann&f=false here. Perhaps Augmented reality art will become something and BC Biermann will become more appreciated, however, currently, he is not getting any real coverage in the art world – if the main art magazines/art sections of newspapers don't want to cover him (and have zero SIGCOV on him), why would Wikipedia
— User:Britishfinance, 18:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Too soon)