Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Griffin (Councilmember)
nbsp; Our guidelines do not say, "&nbsp;'routine' means worthless".&nbsp; President Obama and the War in Iraq are "routinely" covered too, routine coverage means that we can expect that there is enough material about a topic to write an encyclopedia article.&nbsp; Our policy at eletion policy#Alternatives to deletion suggests the next step to consider if a topic is not notable is, where can it be merged?&nbsp; And we have at least one reasonable target, the Richmond City Council.&nbsp; If we re-interpret the delete !votes to be ''merge'' !votes, we can also re-interpret the essence of the delete argument by recalling that |WP:N is not satisfied just because a topic passes , the topic must also be "worthy of notice".&nbsp; So we can still properly ask the question, "Is the topic "worthy of notice?" and question whether or not the topic should have a stand-alone article&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 23:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:D||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Disambiguation)