Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vagina envy (2nd nomination)
Merger with Penis envy makes no sense. The article now has three references wherein the topic has received substantial coverage in refereed scientific journals, satisfying  and . There is clearly room for improvement by rewriting the present stub to incorporate more content from the sources cited as DGG said
— User:Edison, 17:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:N (Wikipedia:Attribution)