Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out Now Consulting (2nd Nomination)
With due respect to WJBscribe, the core issue is the higher standard that needs to be met for a marketing firm in relation to  and , and this does not meet the policy in spirit, and by the very thinnest of margins meets it in letter. As the vast majority of the content the subject puts out is for the primary purpose of self-promotion of it's business and services, often thinly disguised as research and new information, it's a #SELF|primary sources issue. It's the whole Letter Vs. Spirit debate, and on face while it may meet the cited policies, it does not come close to meeting the policies intent (spirit). I have seen thin attempts from some contributors to cite selected references from selected people to push the POV regarding it's notability. As commented by a friend I spoke to earlier this evening "the most credible sources are the ones who say what you want to hear
— User:Thewinchester, 13:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)