Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposed Israeli Nuclear First Strike on Natanz Facility
As the originator of the article, the intention was to use these unfolding events as an illustrative case study of the more general concept of nuclear preemption. I note that nuclear preemption does not seem to have been dealt with yet on wikipedia which is a pity since it is an important aspect of nuclear deterance which is clearly becoming more relevant due to the inevitable march of technology. I have proposed that the original article be merged into Plans_for_strikes_against_the_Iranian_nuclear_program which should in term be linked to from nuclear preemption as an illustrative case study. This move would deal with the article name being POV which, I agree, is inappropriate. In its current form the article does not violate ,  or . I strongly disagree with your opinion that "Personally, I don't think that a newspaper report that generated a few days worth of controversy but seems to have been otherwise ignored is at all notable." in that a potential aggresive nuclear first strike is clearly a major event in human history .... potentially only the third to be precise. I also find it interesting that you hold this opinion and yet have contributed such articles as July_2006_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting, which would seemingly also be inappropriate by your standards
— User:LochVoil, 00:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:No original research)