Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government House, Wellington
The building is indisputably notable, and I oppose having no article about the building, even briefly. The current poor state of the article is due to removing large chunks of text without substituting brief cited paraphrases. The copyvio detector is unconvincing. Of course, there are repetitions of government titles and designations. That does not violate copyright.  is an essay which I find unpersuasive in this case. We are not talking about a promotional article about a new pop "star" or a YouTuber. This is a highly notable topic, and the article should be improved through normal editing
— User:Cullen328, 00:38, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLOWITUP (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)