Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl necklace (sexuality) (4th nomination)
I don't think the nom is all that convincing. My own reasoning, though, is that this article is little more than a . If there were some significant expansion that showed the historical significance of this particular act, or something, that'd be different. As it stands there's just not enough here to warrant a separate article. As for those saying the article ''could'' be expanded, I say in the meantime it should be merged until the content is expanded thusly. It can always be split off again once there's adequate material to warrant a separate article
— User:Equazcion, 19:53, 23 Feb 2010 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)