Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spellfury (2nd nomination)
the article as it stands, is poorly written and unenyclopediatic. But |AfD is not for cleanup, and as noted the series has established notability. A notable topic that is horribly written shouldn't be deleted unless it's |to be started over, and this one isn't bad enough to need that. (Also, deletion rationales that start out "Yeah. No." are asking for |trout
— User:The, 01:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:TNT||WP:TROUT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)