Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physicians for Patient Protection
or possibly '''Merge''' with an article on the broader topic) with the caveat that this article will need some MAJOR revision for neutrality and likely a high level of page protection if it is kept. They appear to have received significant coverage in several large newspapers, like https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-nurse-practitioners-doctors-increase-illinois-20200206-4x7s7quab5bctjffc7hzxrun3m-story.html Chicago Tribune, the https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/12/27/plan-give-nurse-practitioners-greater-role-patient-care-fuels-debate/QiuURmlXLkQfetyIokufnN/story.html Boston Globe, https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2020/02/16/facing-doctor-shortage-california-eyes-more-authority-for-nurse-practitioners/ Times of San Diego. If  isn't met, I think it should be merged and redirected into an article on the issues and controversies around expanded autonomy for RNs and PAs. The article is terrible, yes, but I think the organization warrants coverage
— User:Niftysquirrel, 19:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NORG (Wikipedia:Notability)