Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique Máximo García
I don't think this article deserves this witch hunt it has undergone. There are thousands of articles about nonsense, thousands of stubs and thousands of articles with false references or information which aren't being persecuted so exhaustively. This article has proved its right to be in the wikipedia, as the articles in spanish and italian haven't caused any problems, as well as the author has received several congratulations for them. It is shameful that some people put such a great effort for this article to be deleted according to some terms of notability, as if it were the score in a contest. All the information given for this article is true an extensive enough, an can be fully contrasted with its sources,so I can't understand the aversion of some people who want this article deleted for a pair of clauses of a bureaucratic form. If you are trying to base the deletion of the article in the failure to fulfill  or , you must also refer to the non-online sources, because all the complaints given here just cover the information that can be found on the Internet. Looking up on libaries, newspaper libraries and other physical sources I'm sure we can find enough data to fulfill  and . So, before accusing of lack of evidences, please consult ALL the sources, not only the convenient ones
— User:Lorgar, 13:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP: N||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:N||WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)