Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differences between Christian mysticism and Evangelical mysticism
As I read the article, it was clear to me that I was reading a piece of persuasive writing which uses sources to support the author's conclusion, which is a desire to make a distinction between her own religious tradition and other Christian traditions.  There's certainly room for that sort of essay, but it should be published in an evangelical journal; it's outside the scope of an encyclopedia.  This looks like |synthesis to me, not simply reporting the facts but using them to support a thesis- that mysticism as practiced by many Christians isn't 'real' Christianity.'  Notice that none of the sources seem to actually use the phrase 'evangelical mysticism,' and a google search on the phrase brings up a few blogs but no |reliable sources.  I'm not at all convinced that 'evangelical mysticism' exists as a notable school of thought, and I think that the recent article Evangelical mysticism should probably be added to this AfD as more of the same: lots of sources that aren't actually about something called 'evangelical mysticism,' used in |synthesis to try to create the impression that 'evangelical mysticism' is a subject anyone is writing about
— User:FisherQueen, 12:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:RS||WP:SYNTHESIS (Wikipedia:No original research)