Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irina Lunina
Fails .  Of the sources listed in the article, the http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/opinion/15lunina.html New York Times article is reliable (editorial control), but not independent, being written by Ms Lunina herself.  The http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/16/echoes-of-bear-stearns-one-year-later/ DealBook Blog may or may not be reliable but in any case the coverage is not significant, being essentially just a vox pop.  The one at http://www.pri.org/theworld/?q=node/25150 PRI's The World is interesting - it's both reliable and significant but again it's just a really extended vox pop look at the collapse of her employer.  My good faith searches failed to turn up anything else that could be construed as a |significant coverage in a reliable, independent source
— User:DustFormsWords, 02:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)