Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychosocial (song)
mdash; there are a http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&q=Psychosocial%20single%20Slipknot&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn number of |reliable sources which give significant coverage to this single.  It easily passes the |general notability guidelines for Wikipedia, and given that it is a single by a major band, there is little reasonable doubt that it will chart.  Wikipedia may not be a crystal ball, but the language on  is ''inclusive'' rather than exclusive &mdash; editors arguing that it fails to meet those guidelines because it has not charted are missing the point, and being rather bloody-minded about it to boot &mdash; to wit "A separate article ''is only appropriate'' when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article".  This easily meets that standard.  All songs which meet the specific guidelines are notable; some notable songs may not meet those guidelines &mdash; for example, why do we have a {{tl|future single}} template if not for this exact reason?  You don't even have to |ignore any rules to keep this song &mdash; it already meets the guidelines for inclusion, and only a narrow and incorrect reading of guidelines could possibly claim it is not notable
— User:Haemo, 10:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:MUSIC||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)