Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney L'amour
I do wish to point out that the''New Zealand Herald''http://events.nzherald.co.nz/2012/can-can-dance-workshop-with-courtney-lamour/wellington and ''Dominion Post''http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/4816086/Quake-Fundraisers-every-bit-helps ''Stuff''http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/4537596/Discovering-your-inner-seductress/http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/3673169/Show-off-your-inner-seductress ARE reliable sources and notability, even if only to New Zealand, is notable enough for Wikipedia. We |do not expect someone to have worldwide fame if they at least be determined as having |significant coverage to and in their own country. And secondly, failing WP:ENT does not mean we disregard . Yes, this may always be a stub or start class and yes, this brand new article |has issues,  but these appear |addressable through regular editing and addressable issues are |rarely valid cause for deletion
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 06:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CSB||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:UGLY||WP:ATD||WP:DELREASON (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)