Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States House of Representatives elections, 2012
because I fail to see how this fails  and not having proper sources is not an argument for deletion by itself.  #1 on CRYSTAL states: "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place."  This is a no-brainer here, as it clearly passes this.  Further, it is ironic that CRYSTAL includes the 2012 presidential election (the next election) as an example.  Surely we can extrapolate that to allow the next House article to stay.  Finally, as Mandsford says, we'll have relevant information very shortly - as they say, the next campaign starts the day after the previous election - so what's the point in deleting this
— User:Bds69, 13:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)