Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Ibezim-Ohaeri
The sources are not reliable sources. Columns written by the subject are not an indication of notability. We require reliable third party coverage ''about'' the subject. I looked at the sources above and I'm not really impressed. http://thenationonlineng.net/scourge-child-marriage-lagos/ 1 is a passing mention/quote, http://thenationonlineng.net/daughter-ask-get-married-16/ 2 (same website as 1, but different article) is actually the ''same quote, copied word to word'' as the previous source (which makes me seriously doubt the reliability of the sources). http://newsrescue.com/victoria-ibezim-ohaeri-upset-newsrescue-re-captioning-article-implicating-ihejirika-boko-haram-crisis/#axzz4NEAv653H 3, essentially a repost of her facebook post where she alleged that someone plagiarised her work. http://ekiti.citynewsline.com.ng/news/ekiti-elections-all-parties-were-heavily-rice-sharing-to-voters-victoria-ibezimohaeri 4 redirects to an interview on a citizen journalism site, and https://www.channelstv.com/tag/victoria-ibezim-ohaeri/ 5 seems to be a quote. More importantly, almost every source talks about the subject in context of the organisation which potentially makes it a BLP1E. I guess this is  and in any case there is not enough coverage about the subject for 
— User:Lemongirl942, 06:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:WHYN (Wikipedia:Too soon)