Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Logston (2nd nomination)
i am swaying here, one point of  requires reviews of their works and for them to be "significant or well-known", although there are plenty of reviews available from |"good" sources (see Internet Speculative Fiction Database|ISFDB http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?2856 listing here) - click on individual titles and reviews are listed (there are reviews in addition to those mentioned by {{u|DiamondRemley39}} above) - i note that 5 of the titles have 2 reviews listed that technically meet  ie. multiple reviews, and depending on which books are reviewed in ''Kliatt'', and ''VOYA'' mentioned above may mean that more of her books are wikinotable/articleworthy, a concern is that they may be deemed not well known ie. library holdings (acknowledging that the figures may not be uptodate) are in the low double figures (highest found: ''Dagger's  Edge'' https://www.worldcat.org/title/daggers-edge/oclc/834977018&referer=brief_results 34 libraries, ''Waterdance'' https://www.worldcat.org/title/waterdance/oclc/423044710&referer=brief_results 27 libraries, ''Shadow'' https://www.worldcat.org/title/shadow/oclc/939468051&referer=brief_results 24 libraries), but with Logston being covered by ''Encyc Fantasy'' and ''A to Z Fant Lit'' i am feeling "keepish
— User:Coolabahapple, 06:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NAUTHOR||WP:RS||WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)