Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caiyad Phahad
A blizzard of self-promotional, self-submitted or otherwise unreliable sources; what we're not seeing here are news articles from reliable journalists, published in reliable publications, about the subject.   does not require us to suspend the policies governing notability and verifiability in newcomers' favor.  Further, I have considerable sympathy for the premise that two and a half years in, it is incumbent on an editor to become familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines; no one gets to be a newbie indefinitely.That being said, Caiyad, no one is demanding that you agree to the article's removal, or appreciate the action when it is removed.  Certainly, if you've found other articles on Wikipedia that you don't think meet our notability guidelines, feel free to nominate them for deletion if they cannot be adequately improved
— User:Ravenswing, 15:43, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BITE (Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers)