Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treecat
Wikipedia isn't a fansite. It isn't a meta-fansite. Wikipedia is in all respects a discriminate encyclopedia, we don't let just anything on. We have rigourous guidelines of inclusion which work off of a definition of |notability which hasn't been met in this article. Per Wikipedia:DEL#REASON an article may be deleted if it doesn't meet the notability guidelines.  All of the points that the nominator brings up are valid and per |our deletion policy this article should be deleted because it doesn't meet the relevant notability guideline, and because the content is just not suitable for an encyclopedia as it fails , and .  If this would ever be appropriate for an encyclopedia it would have to be covered from an out-of-universe perspective looking in at the topic and analyizing its significance in the real world.  If this is impossible, which I highly suspect it is, the article doesn't belong here
— User:Themfromspace, 22:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:DEL||WP:PLOT||WP:WAF (Wikipedia:Notability)