Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah N.H. Philpott
without prejudice against recreation in the future if her notability and sourceability improve. Passing NACTOR is not simply a matter of ''listing'' roles — if it were, then ''every'' actor who exists ''at all'' would ''always'' automatically pass NACTOR, because having acting roles is literally the job description. Rather, passing NACTOR's "notable for having had roles" criterion is a matter of |reliably sourcing the article to some evidence of ''significant'' coverage ''about'' her having had roles. The sources here aren't doing that, however: #1 is an article whose core subject is the filmmaker who ''directed'' a film she's in, and it's paywalled so I can't verify whether it contains any substantive content about her or just trivially namechecks her existence; #2 is a blurb in the "alumni announcements" column of the newsletter of the acting school she attended, which is not a reliable or notability-supporting source at all; #3 just verifies a stray fact about another film she's in while completely failing to even mention Philpott's name in conjunction with it. This is not the kind of sourcing it takes to support an article if you're going for "notable because she's been in stuff". She may get the kind of coverage it takes in the future, given that her most potentially notability-making roles are in future films that went into production this year and haven't actually been released yet — so an article can certainly be recreated if and when that happens, but nothing here is already enough today
— User:Bearcat, 13:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)