Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salty Fingers (plant)
Time to come off the fence. The test for |notability is that the "topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". My analysis of the sources offered in the article and in this discussion only finds one independent reliable source with as much as a sentence about salty fingers, http://www.nib.com.my/archives/text/view/67188853?pos=9&hide_header=1&resultset=nstpec%3Awww/cross-search/search.php%3A_1348218272%3Aresultset this article in the ''New Straits Times'', which has about 150 words in a preamble to a recipe, without giving any concrete information about what salty fingers are. I have been unable to find any other independent reliable sources with significant coverage. This hardly constitutes the significant coverage required, and is only one source. I held off from expressing a firm opinion previously because I had hoped that those editors who claimed that this was notable would respond to my analysis with better sources, because I recognise that there is a strong bias against gastronomy in Wikipedia, but the only response has been misrepresentation and belligerence, so I can only conclude that they are unable to find such sources
— User:Phil, 21:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)