Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Biss
I am indeed a novice (sorry for mistakes caused by that). But, I have not seen any  given for any coverage of a controversy over, or notability of, any of Biss's papers, moreso than any of the thousands of other papers that have appeared in top journals. Also, thousands of mathematicians satisfy the criterion I give above.  For example, at the last ICM http://www.icm2006.org/ alone, there were 20 sections of speakers, plus plenary, with about 10-13 in each section.  That makes for more than 210 people in that year alone. Note that Biss was not invited (at that time (2006) his paper was already published (2003), and still thought to be correct, but the work was not deemed important enough for an invitation
— User:Math31415, 22:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)