Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic item (Dungeons & Dragons) (2nd nomination)
On seeing the !votes I'd hoped to close this discussion (and perhaps a better NAC or admin still might) , but there seems a lack of actually justified arguments by the Keep crew and an absence of full  checks throughout. Items are so bound up that they're slightly difficult to filter out from the general coverage of D&D. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zuseH4RrliQC&lpg=PA259&dq=%22dungeons%20and%20dragons%22%20items%20-wikipedia&pg=PA259#v=onepage&q=%22dungeons%20and%20dragons%22%20items%20-wikipedia&f=false D&D for dummies, Magic Items gives detailed coverage in a fairly reliable form (strict editorial control and source checking on the books). Next to consider are probably the reliable game sites - those generally accepted to provide reviews (usually the way of establishing ) should also be deemed reliable/independent for any articles on the topic. E.g. https://www.kotaku.com.au/2016/06/the-20-most-wtf-magical-items-in-dungeons-dragons/ Kotaku The 20 Most WTF Magical Items In Dungeons & Dragons
— User:Nosebagbear, 21:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:NGAME (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)