Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Lord
People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win — and Goth4prosper is correct that the existence of some campaign coverage is not in and of itself a "GNG"-based exemption from having to pass , because ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election ''always'' gets some campaign coverage literally by definition. So the notability test that a candidate has to pass is not "does some campaign coverage exist": it is "does a reason exist why her candidacy should be seen as uniquely significant, in some way that would pass the |ten year test for enduring significance", but that hasn't been shown here. GNG does not just count the footnotes and keep everyone who happens to surpass an arbitrary number: it tests the sources for the ''context'' of what they're covering the person ''for'', and discounts some types of coverage as much less notability-making than some other types of coverage
— User:Bearcat, 23:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Notability)