Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 New York City airplane scare
easily satisfies  (thousands of sources, major mentions, etc.) so the only question is OT#NEWS.  We truly don't know whether any recent thing will have lasting notability, and it is too early to be sure, so we are in the same position as any article involving a recent event.  Looking over the details this is the sort of incident that tends to have lasting notability.  The indications are that it is the intersection of a number of different subjects (the presidency, the air force, 9/11, New York, the war on terror), has gathered broad commentary from a lot of sources, and news coverage has increased rather than decreased from each day to the next.  It is not a frivolous random, tabloid-ish event of the sort normally covered by not#news.  Plus it does inform the reader to know about it.  This is a judgment call, but all in all it looks more likely than not to be notable.  If that proves wrong we can always delete it later.  This is a brand new article about an emerging event.  It should have been given a few days to mature.  As it stands, the article and the event will mature so that by the end of the AfD process we ought to have a better idea
— User:Wikidemon, 02:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)