Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Tel Aviv nightclub attack
for now - This is a difficult one to say the least. I'll dispense with the weak arguments presented first. As of this moment, this article actually has a better argument for / than the 2016 Nice attack. I say this because the Nice attack, though notable, is almost exclusively discussed in sources from 2016 with only two citations from 2017. By contrast, this 2011 attack has been discussed by sources, however limitedly, in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016, and even in 2017. The first real question with regards to this is, whether or not this can be considered routine coverage, even if persistent. I'm a firm no on this, specifically because a terror attack isn't simply ''routine'' coverage and because coming up multiple times in six years negates any routineness about it. I'm also not entirely sure why the OP has linked to Wikiproject:Diversity in their nomination, I assume this was a mislink meant to be for . Eh, again, the sources aren't mirror images of each other and they aren't just local. So this argument doesn't hold much water. Same with , national and international coverage does negate this argument. The OP isn't particularly interested in a GNG argument, since it's obvious that this article will meet it; it received some significant coverage in a variety of reliable sources independent of the subject and is thus presumed notable. You could make that argument and just walk away, to be fair. There's also somebody's "litmus test" for this article about there being casualties, this event has 8/9 (IB/Lede) casualties. As I've explained before, a casualty and a fatality are not the same thing. Casualties include injuries, fatalities, for obvious reasons, do not. That dispensed with, the nom does bring up something of particular value to this kind of discussion. That is, . The big keep or delete split really should come down to that question. The closest this article comes to meeting lasting, afaict, is the branding of this attack as being {{tq|an early example of the the terrorist vehicle-ramming attacks}} phenomenon within the article itself. A check of the sources supporting this claim ... do not support it. From http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_world_/2014/11/05/car_attack_in_jerusalem_why_are_terrorists_ramming_vehicles_into_crowds.html one specific source; {{tq|In 2011, when a stolen taxi rammed into a police roadblock outside a club in Tel Aviv, injuring seven, the Jerusalem Post reported that it was the fifth attack of its kind in the past three years}}. Beyond that, while its part of the I/P conflict, nothing seems to have precipitated out of it. No retaliation, no policy, no nothing ''except'' the cited claim that other vehicle-ramming attacks drew inspiration for this one. Right now, I'm leaning towards a weak delete. I'll have to revisit this, and find the previous AfD, before making a final statement on it. This is just what I have for now
— User:Mr, 14:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:DIVERSE||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:LASTING (Wikipedia:Notability)