Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W2S
to Sidemen, which I have already implemented once but was reverted on the basis of sources that turned out not to even mention the subject of the article (see article talk page). The number of subscribers is meaningless unless significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources ''actually exists'' which it doesn’t, on the basis of the sources in the article and those I can find. A vague wave at  is similarly meaningless unless you can give us some indication of where these sources might exist. And as for the carpet bombing of sources above maybe the editor could just give us the  that show notability because the handful I checked are no better than the ones in the article. Bottom line - it seems very likely that Sidemen are notable, and most of the best sources focus on them, but all coverage of this member specifically is trivial or unreliable or both, and so a redirect is the obvious solution
— User:Hugsyrup, 07:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NEXIST||WP:THREE (Wikipedia:Notability)