Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of military disasters (4th nomination)
I'm leaning delete, but I'm open to arguments to the contrary, as well as to alternatives such as the one directly above my comment (something similar was the outcome of rticles for deletion/Eco-terrorism in fiction, and I wouldn't be opposed to the same thing here). Any list article needs , and these should ideally be the starting point from which the list is constructed, not something we add to a pre-existing list. I think the editors arguing in favour of keeping the list based on otability are really missing the point here—that's not the issue. ''If'' it can be demonstrated that we can have inclusion (and perhaps ''exclusion'') criteria that are {{tq|unambiguous, objective, and supported by wikipedia:RS|reliable sources}} (''nota bene'' plural) to allow us to make a proper list article, I would in favour of keeping that (as-yet hypothetical) list
— User:TompaDompa, 23:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:LISTCRITERIA||WP:N (Wikipedia:Attribution)