Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WXYK
First of all, the information in the article is not verified by sources independent of WXYK.  Heck, it doesn't even seem to be verified by (the non-independent) WXYK website, which is the only non-trivial reference listed in the article.  So I looked on Lexis-Nexis, and surprise surprise, there is no coverage of WXYK, like most radio stations.  So we have a clear failure of  like the nominator said.  Now, in response to all the keep voters above who cite "precedent" or claim that "notability patterns have been set":  please note that precedent is not an argument for automatically keeping or deleting anything.  If there have been good ''arguments'' made in past AfD's that apply to this AfD, then make those arguments.  Simply citing the ''results'' of past AfD's is not convincing.  Next, in response to the keep argument "Do we need to delete all the other local radio stations as well?":  Yes.  Those that have no reliable independent sources that establish notability (i.e. most of them) should be deleted.  Finally, in response to the claim that there is "consensus" that "all licensed full-power radio stations are notable":  this is not true (witness the delete voters here).  Consensus about this radio station will be established in this AfD.  Consensus in past AfD's has nothing to do with consensus in this one
— User:Pan, 17:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)