Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disemvoweling (2nd nomination)
The Jargon File (also published under the name ''The New Hacker's Dictionary'', ISBN 0262680920) is generally regarded as a reliable source on computer-related jargon.  Why would you discount it?  Also, why do you discount the other sources that are linked in the article? Double-tongued Word Wrester Dictionary, for instance, is published by Grant Barrett, a professional etymology researcher, so counts as a reliable source per the definition at .  The term has been discussed in professionally published magazines (see the link to the SFX column in the article), also.  Why are these not reliable sources
— User:JulesH, 13:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)