Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisha JamVwal
Yes that is were I'm concerned, the article must stand on |reliable hird party|third party independent sources, which unfortunately this article don't have. And I'm more worried to know that the author has close relation with the subject ( & ). Chintan, although I can understand that the provided informations might be correct but as I said, here self |promotion and since you know the subject  will interfere. And Wikipedia is |not a blog or free hosting website. Here subject should pass our . And an article only passes notability if the subject has |verifiable |inline hird party|third party |reliable sources. Bollywood hungama and Shiksha.com are not reliable.  In addition please carefully read |this and |this
— [[User talk:Jim Carter - Public|Jim Carter (''from public cyber'')]]''', 18:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:T||WP:COI||WP:PROMO||WP:PROMO||WP:COI||WP:NOTBLOG||WP:GNG||WP:VERIFY||WP:INLINE||WP:T||WP:RS||WP:COI||WP:ADVERT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)