Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Slessor
I'm a bit confused here as a lot of what's being stated is totally unsubstantiated by independent sources. Virtually nothing that anyone has included is independent (including the piece written by her own colleague.) I would expect for someone so "prominent" in their field, there'd be readily available sources to support such statements. As far as the NACADEMIC claim, I'd suggest revisiting that statement because that's a massive stretch. This is definitely borderline at this point and I'll gladly withdraw but |independent sources absolutely need to be added
— User:Praxidicae, 19:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IRS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)