Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I did not have sexual relations with that woman
We should record the notably stupid things that politicians do ''in a suitable article'' about the event, or about the politician. However, it is not encyclopedic to make an article with a title Clinton supporters will see as an attack, and which Clinton detractors will use as a coatrack to list everything bad Clinton said, carefully Quote mining|quote mined. There is no  source asserting that there is something notable about the actual statement (apart from the incident itself, and all the attempts by the Clinton side to avoid admitting misconduct, and the attempts by the other side to force admissions of sexual impropriety). Further, the article is unavoidably  (e.g. who said the statement is a "meme"?). The Bill Clinton|politician is covered in excruciating detail, as is the Lewinsky scandal|scandal, and there is nothing of additional value in this statement (not without |secondary sources asserting there is such value). '''Do not merge''' because that will encourage every POV-pusher to start making attack articles so every notable person's stupid statements end up as redirects
— User:Johnuniq, 11:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SECONDARY||WP:OR||WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:No original research)