Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proportionate pirate law
I cited a textbook which discussed it. I personally would prefer it to be included in a seperate article, for example, stormtrooper effect however, it seems to get deleted constantly. I reviewed the history, and it seems as if the inclusion of the topic included more information. Most of which was entirely POV. However, the POV part of the statement--most of which was gibberish--has been deleted. In essence, the article has been cleaned up. In fact, it now contains the same number of cites that the entire storm trooper effect article. Not to mention, the mention of the inverse ninja law which contains no citations, though it is also mentioned in the textbook I cited. Simply doing a google search does not eliminate the fact it meets  since it is discussed by independent sources
— User:NubianPrince, 22:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)