Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Still Hacking Anyway
but appeal to personal experience is not evidence of notability. Per , this event is expected to have coverage beyond the typical coverage events receive shortly before and after it happens. All the sources are between June and August, 2017. It also had contents I've had to remove, because it was based on reader comments of Tweaker.nl articles which is always disallowed by  with rare exception such as when such comment has been discussed by reliable source. "apparently is the largest event in the series" doesn't justify keeping of its own page without reliable sources that would establish notability. Which ones have gone through formal deletion, but undeleted through the deletion review? I'm not saying to downright delete it. I'm saying merge it, but the merger is getting protested by the article's creator
— User:Graywalls, 14:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:UGC (Wikipedia:Notability)