Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of collections from Easton Press
although against my character, this list does not meet the notability standard for standalone lists—.  I spent over an hour trying to find at least one reliable source, independent of Easton Press that discussed their collections as a group.  As far as I can tell, there is none. Many of the individual collections are discussed in sources, but even those sources are essentially promotional material in various other publications.  But nothing, especially nothing independent of Easton, discusses their collections as a group.  This list hasn’t passed the most basic hurdle for list notability.  Although I would fully support and embrace the concept of  ''Usefulness'' as a valid reason to keep a WP article, unfortunately it isn’t one today.  I also disagree with this list being called spam, it’s not.  It’s just a list that hasn’t met the basic list notability hurdle—.  If sources can be found that discuss Easton Collections as a group, I will change my position
— User:Mike, 16:29, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTESAL||WP:NOTESAL (Wikipedia:Notability)