Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shlomo Riskin
The article provides a clear claim of notability and multiple reliable and verifiable sources are included. Hundreds more sources and some of the many books he has written would only pile on to the obvious case of notability. The bigger issue here is why we tolerate an  the abuse of a well-defined process that requires a nominator to look for sources to support notability before staring an AfD. Here we have an editor who has no other edits to any other article doing an excellent job of nominating this one article for deletion. A speedy keep followed by a sockpuppet investigation / block would appear to be the appropriate course of action here
— User:Alansohn, 05:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)