Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dee Workman Benedict
clearly promotional in intent. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable for the purposes of entitling her to have a Wikipedia article, but the referencing consists of a mix of |primary sources and glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage of other things or people, not coverage that is substantively ''about her'' for the purposes of getting her over 
— User:Bearcat, 18:04, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)