Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle Finger Protests (2nd nomination)
The argument I was trying to make, that you refute by citing  directly supports it. It's tongue in cheek by saying 'there's not enough wikipedia'  makes a clear distinction by what "can be done" and "what should be done" - this article shouldn't be done. The second comment is in regard to promotion, not the poor writing. Often these promotional articles are just written at a different quality - agreed circumstantial at best, but not irrelevant. For your direct comment "That the org's POV is cited in articles on matters being protested is precisely an indicator of notability" does that mean that if a random Joe on the street gives a comment to a newspaper he is now notable? That's nonsense! Newspapers can, and will, take comments from anybody and any organization then print whatever ones get the most clicks. We should seek to distinguish between truly notable groups and ones that are good at getting quips in the paper
— User:LikeMeercats, 17:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PAPER||WP:PAPER (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)