Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis Jones (footballer) (2nd nomination)
The reason behind my deProding was not NFOOTY, it's  and PRODs are meant for uncontroversial deletions. So in order to demonstrate the fact that the subject is failing on GNG, please confute the sources that I am going to present here. I guess merely stating that the subject fails on GNG is not going to suffice the purpose of this discussion. The subject has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources including one from a major sports magazine, ''Sports Illustrated''. Here is the https://www.si.com/soccer/2018/01/30/top-talent-curtis-jones-set-sign-new-deal-liverpool-after-prospering-under-steven-gerrard link to Sports Illustrated article. Apart from that https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/curtis-jones-takes-next-step-14219857 this, https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-u19s-analysis-ben-woodburns-13844633 this and https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/meet-curtis-jones-liverpools-new-13996967 this are from ''Liverpool Echo''. Liverpool FC's official website has published an article on the subject http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/academy/289302-gerrard-this-has-to-be-the-beginning-for-curtis here. A person who does not meet these additional criteria such as , may still be notable under Wikipedia:Notability
— User:HitroMilanese, 17:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY (Wikipedia:Notability)