Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penn Singers
or if the consensus is not to keep, ''Merge'' to an article on the University.  The group has been the primary subject of over 20 articles since 1990 in the campus newspaper, the Daily Pennsylvanian, per http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/home/index.cfm?q=%22penn+singers%22&event=displaySearchResults&buttonPushed=1&sa=Search&forid=1&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&hl=en. TheDaily Pennsylvanian is a respected, award winning, independent campus newspaper, published since 1885, with an editorial review board and a policy of edittorial review of stories, which are written by identified reporters. As such, it is not excluded as a reliable source. (See ongoing discussion of campus newspapers at .) This establishes verification if any of these articles were added to the article, and shows that they are notable at least within their local community, the university, as much as a town arts group would have verification and local attestation of notability with 20 stories in the noncampus town paper or the local TV station. For a campus arts group (there are 45 at Penn, and I certainly do not advocate articles for every one of them) I would like in addition to see 1 or 2 noncampus reliable, independent and verifiable sources showing that they have more than a local notability. the same as if they were off-campus. If they have only local notability, then per  the key facts in the article could be greatly condensed and included in the University's article. Saying "delete because it's just a bunch of students" completely fails as an argument for deletion, because it's just the "IDONTLIKEIT" argument
— User:Edison, 18:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:LOCAL (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)