Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Really Happened (2nd nomination)
I have already 'voted' to '''keep''' but I wanted to cite the following excerpt from the top of : ''This page gives some rough guidelines which most Wikipedia editors use to decide if any form of web specific-content, being either the content of a website or the specific website itself should have an article on Wikipedia. Web content includes, but is not limited to, webcomics, podcasts, blogs, Internet forums, online magazines and other media, web portals and web hosts. Any content which is distributed solely on the internet is considered, for the purposes of this guideline, as web content.''  Notice that is says '''rough guidelines'''.   was '''never''' intended to be some kind of '''absolute law''', and in fact is a living document.  Furthermore, I am sick and tired of ad hominem attacks by referring to posters as meatpuppets simply because they are anonymous, without presenting any evidence that they are in fact sockpuppets.  Talk about a lack of references
— User:Earpol, 12:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)