Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrie Morgridge (2nd nomination)
because sources exist to pass ;  New York Times; :http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/26/your-money/the-art-of-saying-no-when-giving.html; Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-money-lifelessons-morgridge-idUSKCN0ZG2B0; Aspen Public Radio: http://aspenpublicradio.org/post/doing-philanthropy-right-way-donations-large-and-small#stream/0; a name check in The Villager:http://www.villagerpublishing.com/78354/fleurish/guests-rock-n-roll-all-night-at-the-2016-beaux-arts-ball/; and CBS-News Miama because, yes, she and her husband gave money to the MiamiDade school system, http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/03/06/million-dollar-donation-toward-dade-schools-wifi-goal/.  Does she get covered because she is a rich philanthropist?  Yes;  Here's her book on a Wall Street Journal list of the 10 best beach reads for rich people: http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2015/06/01/10-beach-books-from-j-p-morgans-summer-reading-list/; the Denver Post covers her intensively http://www.denverpost.com/2015/06/17/need-a-few-million-dollars-10000-digital-whiteboards-or-a-shipment-of-sheep-hearts-dont-ask-for-them/, and she gets covered incessantly https://www.google.com/#q=%22Carrie+Morgridge%22+++site%3ADenverPost.com. Bottom line: she's rich (her husband is rich, the parents are rich) and they give away a lot of money.  so interviews happen and article are written.   But here's the thing: once the articles are published in mainstream sources, we consider the subject notable.  I may have an aversion to Paris Hilton and to Keeping Up with the Kardashians, others appear to have an aversion to rich philanthropists who give interviews.  But our personal preferences are not the metric of notability.  The metric is RS coverage that is substantive and extensive; she has it
— User:E, 17:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)