Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Everett
The references here are |primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence, not |reliable source coverage about him. And it's not enough to just ''say'' SOFIXIT, because ''anybody'' can simply ''say'' that about ''any'' topic — saving a badly sourced article does not hinge on simply ''theorizing'' that ''maybe'' better sources ''might'' exist, it hinges on ''showing hard evidence'' that better sources ''definitely do'' exist. So I'm willing to reconsider this if somebody can actually show a better quality of sourcing than my searches have been able to find — but it's not enough to just ''say'' that the sourcing needs to be improved if you don't ''show'' any actual evidence that the sourcing ''can'' be improved
— User:Bearcat, 19:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)