Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worm day
It has been suggested that this is a hoax.  It might be, but I'll |assume good faith for a moment and pretend that we all know it is a real event.  There is still no material presented in the article or available on Google to make the article |verifiable, or to establish that it is |notable.  In the absense of sources, this is all OR|original research which is not allowed in Wikipedia.   A passage from the Wikipedia verifiability standards states "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."  I do understand that |Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy and strict interpretation of the policies is not alwasys appropriate, but, in this case, the lack of available sources is pretty damning on the grounds of both  and 
— User:OlenWhitaker, 20:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:V||WP:N||WP:NOR||WP:BURO||WP:V||WP:N (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)