Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festivalism
per everyone above and per . From this experience I have learned that I don't have the same kind of "radar|cruftdar" as many other editors do. To me this just looked like another article on another nutball philosophy. However, when I pointed this out on IRC, 3 other admins instantly knew that the article needed to go. Therefore, I guess "huh?" is as good a rationale as any to those for which such things are instinctual. At least NW has demonstrated that a descriptive deletion rationale is possible, even for such an obvious case as this
— User:Ron, 23:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MADEUP (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)