Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovegirl
I wanted to tag the article for speedy deletion, to be sure, but it doesn't seem to really fill any of the criteria for speedy deletion.  It's not ''exactly'' patent nonsense, not ''exactly'' a non-notable bio...  I was hoping it would quietly die from the prod, but of course the creator had to go remove that template for no good reason.  There really should be some ammendment allowing prods to be re-posted if they're removed without explanation by the article's creator, because I see that happen a lot.  I was unaware of , but I hope the next admin to stop by decides to invoke it.  If ever there was an appropriate circumstance, this would be it!  It's not actual policy, though, so I'll understand either way.  The important thing is that whether it takes another hour or another week, this vanity/girlfriend-cruft/pain-in-the-butt-waste-of-time-to-even-delete article will bite the dust
— User:Icarus3, 09:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)