Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Michael Hyman
Based upon the article as it currently exists, and what I can find in an admittedly brief search, I don't see notability.  I regard federal Article III judges as inherently notable (given the requirement for presidential nomination, Senate confirmation, and lifetime terms); but not all state court judges, certainly not at the trial court level.  There are some hints that Hyman has something more, with the claim of creating "Therapeutic Jurisprudence," but it's not borne out by anything in the reference that purports to support it; and I can't find anything that would suggest that it's a critical distinction.  Likewise, his teaching work does not seem notable, although maybe something just got missed there.  I would suggest to the creating editor that, if she is convinced of Judge Hyman's notability, she seek to have the article |userfied, work to make the claims of notability more apparent and better-cited, and then try bringing it back to article space when she thinks it's ready
— User:TJRC, 19:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:USERFY (Wikipedia:Userfication)