Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional supercouples
both because of the  problems that will inevitably follow, and because lists like this are utterly pointless dead air.  This is a precious notion that is the province of fan magazines and entertainment shows, not a serious subject for an encyclopedia.  The term "supercouple" has no practical meaning, and that we have a definition is far from a compelling argument for this article.  Rather, it's evidence we're already headed down a slippery slope into the realm of fan publishing.  Least compelling is the argument about using sources that call couples "supercouples."  We're trusting puff publications to set the standard for content in an encyclopedia?  Even if they do rise to the level of , and I doubt many do, where is the quality control?  This is beneath us
— User:Drmargi, 19:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)