Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CalWIN (2nd nomination)
I'm not convinced that the computer system used by a welfare agency, no matter how large, is necessarily separately notable. If the litigation becomes notable we could have an article about that, but it would need secondary sources. As is this is pretty much a  situation. Regardless, much of the nomination above does not speak to acceptable deletion rationales
— User:Dhartung, 13:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)