Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Schlossberg (3rd nomination)
nbsp; Note that I commented twice at the most recent DRV.&nbsp; IMO, there is no argument here that satisfies eletion policy without invoking WP:IAR.&nbsp; The argument to WP:NOTINHERITED is a contrary interpretation of rguments to avoid in deletion discussions.&nbsp; The related implied argument that WP:NOTINHERITED is an emerging tenet of WP:NOT does not explain John Quincy Adams.&nbsp; IMO, the policy path to consensus here is to conclude that the topic passes WP:GNG but is not "worthy of notice" as is required by WP:N.&nbsp; The remedy for such is a merge, which does not need AfD.&nbsp; In part I think that editors are not unreasonably reacting to the misuse of the encyclopedia in the "Career" section, but removing trivia and speculation is handled by diting policy.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 16:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:D||WP:A||WP:E (Wikipedia:Disambiguation)