Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter (Starbucks)
I also wanted to address the name issue. The guy has reported to multiple news outlets since 2006 that he's legally changed his name to Winter. Even in the early reporting on him, he's gone under the moniker of "Winter"- he just hadn't legally changed his name just yet. I've emailed him to request that he provide visual proof, but considering that there have been multiple news outlets reporting this I'm not sure how much more we need. I'd also like to state that his website has links to all of the news stations, radio stations, and other news outlets that have reported on him: http://www.starbuckseverywhere.net/MediaAppearances.htm There is also a link to various http://www.starbuckseverywhere.net/EgoSurfing.htm web coverage, but most of those don't seem to be usable. I guess I just have to restate the question: at what point does being notable for one event pass ? If a person has received somewhat regular coverage since 2004 in various sources, at what point does that pass notability guidelines? This is one of those instances where I think that the "one person one event" thing is being used a bit too broadly and I'm worried that saying "only one event so this person isn't notable unless they're one event along the lines of Lee Harvey Oswald" is being far too limiting. Sometimes a person is known for one event that is OK, maybe not something major, but is still reported on enough to where it's more than just a passing news fancy
— User:Tokyogirl79, 05:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)