Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Loxton with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
as legitimate, well sourced spin out articles. This AfD is provocative, unnecessary and will serve only to further wikidramas. "I also note that Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket lists almost all of these as 'low importance'." Are you serious!! 90% of the project's articles are "low importance" as the default standard. The argument seems to be "I don't find it interesting, therefore it should be deleted". If the nominator wants to cite a policy reason for deletion I am all ears. This should be speedy closed and the nominator given a good |slap with a trout
— User:Mattinbgn, 22:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TROUT (Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout)