Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Books Ltd (2nd nomination)
while this did qualify for a speedy keep as nominating an article two days after an closed AFD without a |deletion review) is highly discouraged, and considered disruptive. I decided to look closely at the sources before deciding. The first source is most likely a press release, as there was no author named in the article and researching further the Trade Month articles come from the UK Trade & Investment website, which is a government website that helps UK buinesses expand and grow. So that source is not independent of the subject. The second and third sources are clear press releases from press release websites, not independent neither. The fourth release can be considered "independent" from the subject but it's a local newspaper award, which isn't a claim of |notability
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DRV||WP:N (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)