Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 1913
per Mandsford. In addition, this is a , an acceptable type of forking. If month articles were merged into their respective year, the thing would be absurdly long. And I don't think it's redundant to 1913. That article has two entries for January, neither of which overlap with those in January 1913
— User:Braincricket, 15:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPINOFF (Wikipedia:Content forking)