Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Horton (radio host) (2nd nomination)
I've been swinging my opinion with keep or delete, and choose delete. Almost all of the sources appear to be associated with Scott Horton, and are not independent of him. I've done a '''Scott Horton" radio host''', and I get no independent results. If it fails , it's not notable. I would've choose keep because it |can {{small|(or will)}} be improved as shown above and a currently a COI edit request with the proposed addition of sources. But once again, the sources are not ''independent'' of the subject. However, cCitations are just for |verification of statements, and you only need enough citations to ''fully'' verify a statement. The proposed additions are |citation overkill, which is excessive turning the purpose of citations from verifiability to notability. With my statement, as of right now with my argument knocking out ''all'' of the keep !votes, it's 2 delete, 0 keep. &#123;&#123;Template:replyto|replyto&#125;&#125
— User:Can, 02:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ATD||WP:VERIFY||WP:OVERCITE (Wikipedia:Notability)