Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dusty Springfield's legacy
any reliably sourced content to Dusty Springfield#Legacy. That section could afford a little more content, and this is a plausible search string and redirection will take readers to exactly where the information is. This is ''not'' to be interpreted as a '''keep''', per the essay-like content, the duplication (sans sources) of much of the information in the Dusty Springfield article, and the |WP:original research/synthesis concerns (although I can see the possibility of a Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard|WP:HEYMANN-like improvement if someone is willing to put effort in to restructure this as a valid sub-article of Dusty Springfield and |reliably source the content
— User:Saberwyn, 05:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)