Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Goenka (2nd nomination)
the source analysis by Hako9 shows that she just barely passes GNG, with two reliable sources giving her significant coverage. The article could use quite a bit of work, but it’s not promotional to the extent a  delete would be the solution
— User:Devonian, 02:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)