Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pippa Middleton (2nd nomination)
and a  to the nominator: the first AfD was shot down; there's many times more coverage of Pippa Middleton now than there was then, and this nomination is absurd. The forwarded argument for deletion is that she is not herself notable because her sister is actually the notable one. But the fallacy in that argument is easy to see: in the same way, her sister must not be notable either because she has merely inherited notability from her more famous husband. And he in turn has merely inherited his notability from his more famous father, who in turn ... and so on. It is true you do not attain notability ''merely'' by virtue of being connected to someone notable, but that does not ''prevent'' you from attaining notability of your own, even if that connection is what kick started it. The media is now full of articles about Pippa Middleton and she is now notable in her own right. In the last AfD I quoted the Daily Mail; the nominator has conventiently tried to exclude that report. Try instead this report from CBS that she is now considered http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-32917_162-20058721-10391716.html "England's most notable bachelorette" instead. Or one of the other thousands of reports worldwide about her, if you would prefer
— User:RichardOSmith, 22:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TROUT (Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout)