Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of criticism and critique articles
largely per NorthAmerica1000. The nom's  complaint is off the mark, as that style guide is entirely about article content referring to their own nature as articles ("This article is about George Washington"), and doesn't deal with indexes or any kind of list at all; list indexes are naturally about what Wikipedia articles exist and so are not improper self-references. Warden's  !vote is also irrelevant as Coin945 explained, as LISTN has nothing to do with this kind of index; see instead  and  for navigational/organizational lists. That takes care of all the actual deletion arguments
— User:Postdlf, 15:43, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SELFREF||WP:LISTN||WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)