Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John R. Schindler
This article is basically a tabloid gossip column entry, not an encyclopedic article. People are pilloried every day on the internet for stupid nonsense, are we to have articles about every Tom, Chris and Sally who has written a book who then showed someone a nude selfie? Pathetic. And Gawker isn't a reliable source, so those ought to go. How many other of these sources would fail ? And while we're at it, let's discuss . People claim this guy is notable enough to have an article here based on the  guideline. So, is he notable for his writing or for his penis pics? If he's notable for his writing, then the penis pic garbage is flagrantly in violation of UNDUE and needs to go (and after that, what content do we have?). If you're claiming he's notable for the penis pics, then the article needs to be deleted per BLP1E. Please pick one
— User:The, 03:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:UNDUE||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)