Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Source Credibility
This is a classic example of an article with multiple academic independent reliable sources that treat this subject in a major way, including one peer reviewed article entirely about the subject. Although the article could use fleshing out (even in it's current version), it easily exceeded the |notability, |verifability, |reliable source requirements. It's not |original research nor an OT#OR|essay, as noted by many of the above. It also was improved during the AfD with added RS, structure, and content, all adding up to Keep. Also I oppose a merge as this seems to be more about the academic field than the merge targets that were suggested
— User:Becksguy, 20:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)