Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riskified
None of the sources meet the criteria for establishing notabilty. https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-riskified-tackles-credit-card-fraud-1001251299 The Globes article is an interview with the founders, not intellectually independent, fails . https://www.jpost.com/Jpost-Tech/Business-and-Innovation/The-immigrant-story-at-the-heart-of-Israels-fraud-fighting-start-up-569092 Both this Jerusalem Post reference and https://www.jpost.com/Jpost-Tech/Meet-the-Israeli-anti-fraud-start-up-that-protects-shoppers-542327 this one are classic chrurnalism - faux "profiles" complete with the usual photo/quotes/vision/growth/funding structure but, you know, no actual "news", fails as not being intellectually independent, fails .  https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2018/04/your-online-purchase-might-get-declined-for-no-reason-anyone-is-willing-to-tell-you/ The MotherJones reference is the best of a bad lot but it is merely commenting on the WSJ reference and doesn't provide and in-depth information on the company and fails . This company obviously has a marketing dept but the topic does not appear to be notable and fails  and GNG
— User:HighKing, 12:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)