Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamella Bordes
we've had a few of these recently and the point I have made elsewhere is that the test for  is ''"significant coverage"'' not ''"significant complimentary coverage"''. Selecting which sources we include based on whether or not they are complimentary of the subject is contrary to . Excluding material because |we don't like it is akin to |original research in that we are building an article which is not based on reliable sources. There are always going to be some subjects (including BLPs) which have only uncomplimentary coverage. That is unfortunate but |Wikipedia is not censored. It didn't take much to find more sources, like http://www.deccanherald.com/content/275816/masters-light-shade.html this from the Deccan Herald, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1254490/What-Pamella-Bordes-did-From-society-girl-life-hippy-haven.html this and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255830/The-wages-sin-She-escort-girl-affairs-Establishment-figures-shocked-Britain-Today-Pamella-Bordes-chats-men-internet.html this from the Daily Mail, http://www.theweek.co.uk/people-news/16301/pamella-bordes-discovered-living-goa this from The Week (Indian magazine)|The Week, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100302/jsp/frontpage/story_12165591.jsp this from The Telegraph (Calcutta)|The Telegraph and http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1309&dat=19890402&id=A6JUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=hJADAAAAIBAJ&pg=6882,305507 this from the New Straits Times. None of those are from the News of the World, by the way
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NPOV||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:OR||WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:Notability)