Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Angels Network
WP:TOOSOON. I tracked down the mystery-meat https://space.taurigroup.com/news/start-up-space.html analyst report (https://space.taurigroup.com/reports/Start_Up_Space.pdf PDF) that's the main reference, it's not impressing me as a source for this article, apart from being a promotional work to sell the analyst's services; even though likely factually accurate, all mentions of Space Angels are passing. SpaceNews and BBC are RSes, but the things sourced to them are actually in quoted words from Chad Anderson. Too much sourcing to CrunchBase, a directory. The Forbes cite is to an actual staff piece and is good. Some of the refs are good. They might pass  in not too long, but if this article is kept it'll need serious RS culling. (And this is after it already got one RS cull - that previous version is ''terrible
— User:David, 12:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)