Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur (Dungeons & Dragons)
I think there may be a general misunderstanding that a mention on a fansite or a passing reference in a third party publication is a reliable secondary source, when in fact they are nothing of the kind. Evidence that these D&D monsters have notability outside of its primary source (a role playing game) needs to be shown by "|real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance, not solely a detailed summary of that work's plot". As this article is composed of Wikipedia:Waf#The_problem_with_in-universe_perspective|in universe #PLOT|plot summary, sources that support the in universe content do not provide of notabilty
— User:Gavin, 12:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FICT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)