Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in English labeled the worst ever (3rd nomination)
To the people electing "Keep", please explain how the current "cleaned-up" version of this list passes  - it still contains such blatant POV as "Aqua's satirical dance number is not strictly noted as the worst..." (so it should ''NOT'' be in this list) and "'Disco Duck'... Near the top of The Book of Rock Lists' list of worst #1 hits" (so it should ''NOT'' be in this list), and that's just the first few lines. This list must use solid verifiable criteria for inclusion, or it is just obvious editorial picking-and-choosing per Luna Santin et al. These two examples prove the point categorically. Since no such selection criteria have been asserted or seem likely ever to be asserted, this is an obvious Delete as intrinsic NPOV and NOR failure with no hope of credible fix-up. #Lists and criteria for inclusion of list members is absolutely clear on this. It is not enough when it comes to lists to cite a random unnotable source per entry - criteria must be clear, self-evident and unbreakable from the start, and must apply to ''every'' entry in the list
— User:DaveG12345, 11:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:LIST (Wikipedia:No original research)