Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Gray's Power Company (2nd nomination)
According to https://hometheaterreview.com/richard-grays-power-company/ homeatheaterreview it is/was "One of the most interesting success stories in high-end audio and home theater... Gaining a cult following throughout the audio underground" - that site has a https://hometheaterreview.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=%22Richard%20Gray%27s%20Power%20Company%22&IncludeBlogs=1&limit=20&page=2 bunch of reviews but may not be a sufficiently RS. ''Stereophile'' has a https://www.stereophile.com/powerlineaccessories/255/index.html large review in 2000 and https://www.stereophile.com/content/richard-grays-power-company-400s-ac-line-conditioner-michael-fremer-november-2004 another in 2004 -- both negative. There's a number of other in-depth reviewshttp://stereotimes.com/acc033100.shtmlhttp://www.soundstagenetwork.com/revequip/richard_grays_power_company.htmhttps://www.avrev.com/home-theater-ac-power/ac-power/richard-grays-power-company-1200s-power-conditioner-2.htmlhttps://www.audaud.com/audaud/MAY01/EQUIP/equip1MAY01.html. There's also evidence of some kind of reviews in ''Jazz Times'', ''Sound & Vision'', and ''The Absolute Sound''.https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&tbm=bks&q=%22richard+gray%27s+power+company%22, which suggests a likelihood of further print coverage. There's not a huge amount on the company itself to clearly meet CORPDEPTH, but there appears enough reviews to satisfy GNG of at least their 400S and  applies for manufacturers. By analogy to NCREATIVE, etc, coverage of a body of work should be considered as evidence for notability even if coverage of the creator is limited. That said, I'd be happy enough with a merge to capsule in a list of noteworthy audio manufacturers until there's (NPOV, RS) expansion but I can't see a suitable target and a permastub is hardly the worst thing in the CORP world
— User:Hydronium, 06:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRODUCT (Wikipedia:Notability)