Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack McClellan
The notion of a flash-in-the-pan  works a lot better if you don't have a ''year's'' worth of cited sources, as this article does.  User:Debate's and DGG's assertions notwithstanding, I can find nothing in  requiring criminal convictions before reporting on |reliably sourced information about the subject's involvements with the authorities.  Moreover, while  correctly states that we should exercise due caution about outing negative comments that a subject might reasonably not want revealed, a fellow who proudly proclaims the information on his website and on the talk show circuit (and, indeed, the precipitating factors in the world noticing him in the first place) might reasonably be described as having blown the gaffe already
— User:RGTraynor, 16:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT||WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)