Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Journal of Books
As I commented earlier, I agree with nom's analysis of the Sagetree case study and ''The Booklover Magazine'' interview. They are not independent, reliable, secondary sources. The ''Publishers Weekly'' piece is an acceptable start on sources, but there is no other independent coverage of any depth. I don't see the "two references" A Guy into Books claims, and they haven't responded when asked for elaboration. Does not meet  or 
— User:Worldbruce, 12:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)