Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 205
Full disclosure: I created this article and many of the other lists of U.S. Supreme Court case article lists. But as per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 113 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 35 cited by Davewild, those well reasoned arguments should really suffice. I will also say that I use these articles all the time to navigate and create new articles. Nowhere else on wikipedia is there a complete list of US Supreme Court case articles. It is also organized chronologically, so despite what Indrian says, it fulfills the first two categories of the WP:LIST. As for Indrian's point that wikipedia isn't a directory at , that page says: "Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contributed to the list topic, for example Nixon's Enemies List." I would say this is comparable
— User:Cdogsimmons, 00:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)