Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Narvaez, Jr.
First of all, to address a misconception brought up by {{U|Soetermans}}, popularity actually ''does'' confer notability for entertainers, to a degree. See , which states "2. Has a large fan base or a significant 'cult' following." shows likely notability. Keep in mind that a lot of the sources likely to discuss Mr. Narvaez are primarily online publications, which have a quick decay in terms of search engine findings. Here's several sources that seem to either meet or come very close to meeting GNG, in my opinion: http://www.tubefilter.com/2015/05/06/ray-narvaez-jr-rooster-teeth-twitch-full-time-streaming/  http://www.craveonline.com/culture/845837-ray-narvaez-jr-leaves-rooster-tooth-order-full-time-twitch-livestreamer  http://www.popsci.com/can-playing-video-games-be-your-full-time-job  (first three are the ones presently in the article), http://www.tubefilter.com/2015/06/11/captainsparklez-ray-narvaez-jr-twitchcon-guests/ , http://www.tubefilter.com/2014/11/07/rooster-teeth-x-ray-and-vav-animated-series/ , http://www.geekireland.com/breaking-news-ray-narvaez-jr-leaving-achievement-hunter/ , http://www.austinchronicle.com/screens/2014-07-04/at-rooster-teeths-annual-rtx-fest-its-all-about-the-community/ , http://www.vavel.com/en-us/television/547803-the-strangerhood-is-back.html . Given the assumption of notability provided by  based on a clear "cult following" as well as the above evidence suggesting GNG is possible to meet, especially if I had access to local offline sources, I believe this should be kept. I'm not directly placing a keep vote myself because I happen to be a fan, but I encourage other editors to consider the sources I've supplied and the entertainer notability guidelines. Pinging {{U|Robert McClenon}} and {{U|Kyle1278}} to ensure they see the entertainer guideline
— User:BU, 15:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ENT||WP:ENT (Wikipedia:Notability)