Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Mercieca
To address some points made above, I'd like to clear things up. First, I don't think this article is notable based on the . GNG requires {{tq|'''significant coverage'''}} which is ''not'' to be found here. I also do not think the subject meets the normal NPROF route. ''There are no significantly quantifiable reviews of her first book.'' This is where I !vote to keep comes in. As {{u|XOR'easter}} describes, #C7 is made for the situations we have found ourselves in. We have an individual who has clearly portrayed themselves as an academic, but such individual lacks the academic "chops" (if you will) to be considered notable in that field. The alternative route to notability (from my reading of PROF#C7) is becoming notable for frequent media appearances in your capacity as an academic. |Reliable sources in the news media have frequently cited her contributions and thoughts, but her colleagues in the academic field have thus far dismissed several of her claims. The solution here is not to delete the article outright, but instead it is to naturally portray what it is she believes and the critical response to it (both good and bad). I hope that all makes sense. I still can provide more sources if needed... &#8211
— User:MJL, 16:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)