Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pound for pound
Outside of the dictionary definition, the usage of the term in some other way would need  about the usage of the term, not simply referencing others using the term or  on how the term is being used by various sources. None of the sources provided, nor any found in a quick web/news search, are ABOUT the term. The HBO article almost comes close, but even if it did then it would be a single source of dubious reliability (written by an HBO staffer for their "inside HBO" desk). Ultimately, it is either DICDEF, or fails 
— User:Tgeairn, 21:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)