Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthrosexual
It appears to be in moderate use, but the mentions I've read through google seem contradictory to its exact definition, and at least one does call it a |neologism.  Any article that relies on a LiveJournal definition as its primary cite has problems, and it would appear that much of the article are the opinions of the page creator, who has decided which definitions she/he likes, and which are "confused".  Perhaps this doesn't belong on Wikipedia until a more authoritative definition can be sourced
— User:Escape_Orbit, 17:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)