Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Later-no-harm criterion
A http://www.google.com/search?q=Later-no-harm+criterion&hl=en&start=20&sa=N Google search on this term shows it is in use, but most hits are from Electorama/ElectoWiki or from Wikipedia mirrors or from a personal website.  I'll also note that two years ago, we had to clear out a lot of unsupported election-theory articles that were little more than |original research.  Later-no-harm appears to be in circulation among a small circle of, uh, election-theory hobbyists, but so far I'm not aware of it having had any influence on the real world, or even of being covered nontrivially in multiple reliable sources.  This counts more under WP policy than anyone's smell test.  I'll defer to anyone who can provide better-sourced information, but currently I'd favor a '''merge''' into an article on election systems and criteria used to evaluate them
— User:Barno, 01:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)