Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Election Selection Trauma (second nomination)
Bad faith nomination. Nom put in a hoax tag, but didn't discuss it on talk, then nominates for deletion two minutes later.  Nothing has changed in the article, nothing suggests that (lack of) consensus would change in a month's time (since the last AfD). Can you point to discussions you've had with editors regarding that consensus on this article might have  been formed?  Not that I see much worth to this particular article, but seems it could be improved and I see no evidence consensus has changed (or formed) that would validate a renom per 
— User:Sparkhead, 02:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CCC (Wikipedia:Consensus)