Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Window sitter
Just to restate my comments from WT:ANIME, the article is entirely original research, has no sources whatsoever (an image gallery is not a source), and does not shows any indications of notability via reliable, third-party sources. Further, this term falls into the category of |neologisms as a Google search for reliable sources does not turn up anything
— User:TheFarix, 17:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)