Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pawnee capture of the Cheyenne Sacred Arrows
There are sufficient minimal, reliable, sources to satisfy the minimum required on notability grounds, as noted by GMG. Copyvio accusations need to be clearly made, a general accusation isn't sufficient, especially when overview tools like Earwig don't indicate a breach. Inability to access sources, via paywalls, offline etc |does not invalidate them. Quality accusations are the most grounded, but as is always made clear, aren't grounds for article deletion. Saying you could add shorter accurate detail to another article isn't sufficient, if the article could legitimately stand as-is
— User:Nosebagbear, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SOURCEACCESS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)