Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilcoo Camp (2nd nomination)
If we actually had an article about Camp Awakening, then this could be mentioned in and redirected there. But they're not the same thing for the purposes of establishing that ''Camp Kilcoo'' is notable enough for an article — Kilcoo is a camp ''facility'', while Awakening is an ''organization'' that organizes a camping ''event'' held ''at'' Camp Kilcoo. But notability is |not inherited, so the fact that a potentially more notable organization uses Kilcoo as a venue is not a notability freebie that exempts Kilcoo from having to have |reliable source coverage ''about Kilcoo''. This is the same as the reason why the camp facility where I used to do Boy Scouts camp in the summer is not automatically notable enough for a Wikipedia article just because the Boy Scouts themselves are — the ''camp'' isn't itself the ''subject'' of enough reliable source coverage to clear a Wikipedia notability standard, and just because the camp's events ''included'' regional Boy Scout camp week doesn't make them the ''same'' thing as the Boy Scouts themselves
— User:Bearcat, 18:21, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)