Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bell & Ross
Not otability|notable per |GNG, CORP|NCORP,  and OTYELLOW|Wikipedia is "NOT" a business yellow page directory nor free OTADVERTISING|advertising vehicle. The last two alone give amply reasoning why a run-of-the-mill luxury watch company (as stated above), should not be presented on Wikipedia. There are many multiple hundreds of thousands and maybe millions of companies and this is why we don't advertise for them as they are not encyclopedic. The company self-professes ''"as a young house"'' and there is no historical significance. This continued push to get companies listed on Wikipedia needs to be resisted according to current WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines. Let them pay facebook in lieu of free full page Wikipedia sponsored advertising. Oh! It is free so why not --right? What about the "AeroGT concept car" that would seem to be pretty notable. It is a https://www.designboom.com/technology/bell-and-ross-aerogt-concept-03-18-2016/|''computer generated concept'' car for ----- advertising ----- and not an actual designed car
— User:Otr500, 12:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NOTYELLOW||WP:NOTADVERTISING (Wikipedia:Notability)