Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Raab
Probably . However he probably will be notable if current coverage level continues for a couple of years. This one is relatively in depth - http://jewishexponent.com/2013/06/12/brothers-document-history-by-tracking-down-historical-documents/. Aside from that he's got lots and lots of mentions in relations to sales/discoveries of historical documents. If I had found another in-depth article on Raab himself (by a higher caliber source than jewishexponent) I probably would've flipped this to weakish keep
— User:Icewhiz, 05:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)