Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hillary Clinton controversies
per . No clear inclusion criteria. Almost any political position in the United States will be "controversial," for example. The list is a mishmash: some of the entries involve actual investigations; some involve criticism of perceived "gaffes" in the media, and still others are run-of-the-mill political criticism or smears (the "accent" and "adopting last name" bits are particularly silly, and the inclusion of one author's speculation that Clinton and Vince Foster had some sort of romantic relationship is not a "controversy," only an unverified and irresponsible assertion by one author). I also agree with others that have pointed out that it raises BLP concerns for a list entry to give an  allegation of misconduct on the part of an individual without also noting that the individual was subsequently cleared
— User:Neutrality, 05:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)