Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eaton Partners (2nd nomination)
Not sure why you don't think there's .  The Bloomberg article is a perfectly clear-cut discussion of the company, and the WSJ and Columbia Business article are pretty good. The WSJ article is not directly about Eaton but certainly discussed the company in some depth; the Columbia Business article discussed the company directly but is arguably not a nationally-recognized journal (no bitching, please, Columbia alum Wikipedians!).  The article needs work, but that's never a reason for AfD. I may have a go at improving this one.   P.S. Thanks {{U|SwisterTwister}} for prompting me
— User:Fiachra10003, 16:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)