Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShipHawk
since subject fails . The sources are simply not there: The usual self-references, e.g. https://shiphawk.com/about/ here; an https://adage.com/article/digital/walmart-beat-a-rival-loses-money-care/301257 article on ''Ad Age'' about Walmart going against Amazon (company)|Amazon with a single mention of our subject; a 2014 https://csq.com/2015/01/the-disruptors-the-end-of-business-as-usual/# piece on a website about eight of the "new breed of entrepreneurs who are transforming traditional industries" which includes our subject; an ''Inc.'' https://www.inc.com/magazine/201505/john-peabody/fulfillment-a-love-story.html report on "outside logistics" that name drops ShipHawk once; plus two routine articles on ''Tech Crunch'', https://techcrunch.com/2014/10/06/shiphawk-5m/ one about the firm raising capital and the https://techcrunch.com/2013/04/30/shiphawk-aims-to-be-the-only-retail-shipping-solution-you-ever-need/ other an advertorial. A case of , we may wish on them
— User:The, 08:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)