Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RevSpace
My vote is still keep, but let's continue the debate here so it is clear that it happens after the relisting. I have commented on the noticeboard, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Masters_theses_as_reliable_source_for_notability_purposes here. I argue that it is  because the thesis was supervised by Albert Benschop and the University of Amsterdam would definitely be accredited in a US context, it is listed as the 123th best university in the world. I see you updated the table with sources. I disagree with your evaluation about the The Register article. The article is primarily about the action that RevSpace took, and gives some further explanation on the actions of the criminal for context. For the Computerworld article, the same applies. To quote from WP:INHERITORG: "An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it.". Notice the ''merely''. We have multiple sources about events ''initiated by'' RevSpace. RevSpace was maybe in that article ''associated'' with the event of the attack, but the article was primarily about their initiative of assisting someone in becoming more ethical
— User:Dwaro, 09:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)