Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients (2nd nomination)
per  2.4: "nominations that are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course", and because nobody besides the nominator asked for wholesale deletion. I had closed this as a duplicate discussion of the talk page discussion, also intiated by JBsupreme: Talk:Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients#How is this list discriminate?, but someone here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FComparison_of_Internet_Relay_Chat_clients_%282nd_nomination%29&action=historysubmit&diff=340949146&oldid=340906721 thought this exercise in futility should continue. There's also Talk:Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients#A way forward|a RfC going on to decide a criteria for inclusion, which I hope will draw outside input, as the long term combatants are obviously deadlocked
— User:Pohta, 20:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SK (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)