Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Bogdanor
I could only find sixteen cites, ''total,'' on Google News http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&as_scoring=r&as_maxm=10&q=%22Paul+Bogdanor%22&as_qdr=a&as_drrb=q&as_mind=13&as_minm=9&as_maxd=13&sa=N&tbs=nws:1,ar:1#q=%22Paul+Bogdanor%22&hl=en&as_qdr=a&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&ei=PBC2TLnDCcT58AaYx9iBDA&start=10&sa=N&fp=9f2370386c77b788 about Bogdanor, and none discussing him in any detail at all, let alone substantive detail, as is required.  I disagree with the  premise of the nom - the article doesn't advocate any positions, but merely states that the subject holds them - but I would expect a prominent blogger to have far more G-News cites, and so believe that the subject neither passes the GNG nor the WP:BIO bar
— User:Ravenswing, 20:16, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)