Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of food
per Bartlett; this is fundamentally a question of whether the sourcing verifies its claim to notability, and, whilst it leans perhaps rather too heavily towards one particular source, per , the fact that they are Korean (and German?) does not stand against them. The arguments favouring deletion rather tend themselves towards : reading as |an essay, being |poorly written, and  |that it should be TNT'd, and much of the nomination itself could fall under 
— User:Serial, 15:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOENG||WP:AADD||WP:PERESSAY||WP:UGLY||WP:TNTTNT||WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Verifiability)