Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daymaker
per #Films|WP:NOPE.  I found out that the best this one did in festivals was 3rd place "Best Feature Film - Drama/Comedy" at the "Cleveland Indie Gathering".http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0784618/awards  Not enough. Sad to say, but there is fishing boat somewhere called "Daymaker" and it has far more press than does this film... and then there is a hair salon on wheels that hosts a "Project Daymaker" which also has more press.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2006&as_user_hdate=2010&q=%22Daymaker%22&scoring=a&q=%22Daymaker%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go  And while the one in-depth article about this film is quite decent,http://www.daymakermovie.com/html/news_article.html the "one" is not nearly enough.  And really folks... this one does not qualify for a rather bitey ING... unless this brand new artcle had been recreated a number of times or is somehow a hotbed of dissention... and neither seem to be the case.  It's simply a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daymaker&action=history several-hours-old article about a film which has no sourcable notability.  No need to over-react. Sheesh
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 03:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:SALT (Wikipedia:Too soon)