Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish
The title name is about a sentence in a chapter in a particular book. If we are going to separate the two then we must show autonomy by delineation (Notability) because it is |not inherited. Do we have ''Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish (Moby Dick)'' or ''Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish (law)''? There is the ''references in the article'': #1)- Law: "JSTOR", #2)- Need a "VCU eID", #3)- Not a good reference, #4)- Law: "Concise Introduction to Property Law", #5)- Law: "Vermont Law Review" (“He who has got it gets to keep it..." p.47), #6)- About the book; "The Book as Artefact, Text and Border", #7)- About the book?, #8)- Law: Melville's Bibles; "The question of possession", #9)- Either: "No, I am not a loose-fish and neither are you". ''Suggested references'' by Tokyogirl79. #1)- About the book: but does present information about ''Dead white men'', #2)- About the book: not a great reference, #3)- Law: who owns the baseball, #4)- N/A: Same as 5 above, #5)- Law: "Concise Introduction to Property Law", #6)- N/A: Included above,  #7) N/A: Same as 8 above , #8)- Not a good reference
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)