Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech G5
No, evidently not. http://www.techspot.com/reviews/hardware/mouse_roundup_gaming/ please http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1846968,00.asp make http://www.trustedreviews.com/peripherals/review/2005/10/19/Logitech-G5-Gaming-Mouse/p1 sure http://techgage.com/article/logitech_g5_laser_mouse/ there http://reviews.cnet.com/mice/logitech-g5-laser-mouse/4505-3148_7-32379337.html aren't http://www.virtual-hideout.net/reviews/Logitech_G5_Laser/index.shtml stacks http://www.geek.com/logitech-g5-and-g7-gaming-laser-mice/ of |sources available from google by typing -"whatever it is" review- before listing something at AFD. Those came from the first 30 hits, there were more that could be acceptable among those and doubtless others further back. Multiple sources, at the very least some of those pass as reliable, many are very in-depth - it passes notability, easily
— User:Someone, 03:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)