Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bmcabana SF
COI or not, Zefu zungu has a point. Just claiming "Fails X" is not helpful when a lot of sources are mentioned. And claims that those sources are all unable to be correct either linkhttps://reviewonline.co.za/polokwane-news-team/ appears to be a reliable source (editorial board and all) covering the subject in detail (remember, blogs by reliable sources are usually reliable sources as well). Same goesbfor the coverage in the The Sowetan, and SAGOODNEWS https://sagoodnews.co.za, bothe are clearly reliable sources, That this contain interview parts does not disqualify them ad reliable sources. While Roodepoort https://Roodepoortrecord.co.za accepts submissions, it performs editorial controlhttps://roodepoortrecord.co.za/about-us-new/ , which should suffice to make it a reliable source as well. A short Google news search finds other sources and articles but not in one place, but they also give details aboutbthe subject, the sourced articles meet criteria for Wikipedia inclusion for basic criteria 
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)