Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pictures for Sad Children
Between full Google searches and news-only searches, this seems to be on the bubble of notability. It averages 100+ views per day, so users are still interested in it. It has a high ratio of primary to tertiary sources, but that's no reason to delete. Nominator's rationale isn't in line with policy. Assuming the claim that the archive will be put back online if this page is deleted, then Parabolist's argument becomes self-defeating. Thoughtmonkey dismisses it as an event by a non-notable person, but the comic and ''events themselves'' seem notable per coverage. NoThanks fails to understand . Relaxing links to relevant essays, but does not actually make a point with them. A quick search of Google News shows at least two articles from 2016 that give coverage to the story, so the  claim doesn't hold water.  Xaxxyxxxyx makes a lot of unsupported claims. aslamp is refuted per Dane. Bottleofink makes an emotional appeal, but I side with Dane - removing sourced (and undisputed!) information because the subject doesn't like it damages the integrity of Wikipedia
— User:Argento, 14:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NTEMP||WP:RECENT (Wikipedia:Notability)