Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullshido.net (4th nomination)
Regarding notability:  I notice that practically every article in the list of social networking sites is sourced much less than the Bullshido.net article.  I know, , but let's not forget :  "The fact that it's 'only' a common outcome is not sufficient grounds to ignore the accumulated weight of Wikipedia's daily practice."  This isn't just a common outcome; it's the overwhelming standard.I notice that not one argument in favor of deletion has referenced a single precedent, much less a body of precedents.  They mostly consist of selective quotes from Wikipedia standards, or just blurting out the names of the standards.  That's not reasonable.  It's just wikilawyering, and bad wikilawyering at that.I hope the closing admin takes the actual weight of Wikipedia precedent into account, rather than the selective and incomplete invocations of isolated policies
— User:Cy, 18:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:AFDP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)