Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WHJG-LP
If the only reasoning that can be given for a keep is to blindly point at  and this argument is accepted, then outcomes like this will keep happening regardless of whether or not the topic is itself notable. Effectively whatever subtopic gets on  self-perpetuates its own existence from merely being on the list. The additions on that list don't contain examples or citations to even demonstrate the case; anyone who makes an addition to that essay (in good faith mind) is unlikely to be challenged because others will, most likely, not be familiar with it that topic area and so allow it.  is an essay, look closely at the header on the top of the page: "''Please defer to the relevant policy or guideline in case of inconsistency between that page and this one.''" What's a relevant policy guideline for an AfD? -REASON with the supplement guideline |WP:N. The only source that comes close to satisfying  is this brief in a local newspaper: http://rockrivertimes.com/1993/07/01/new-low-power-radio-stations-on-air/. This article is nowhere close to 
— User:IRWolfie, 19:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OUTCOMES||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:DEL||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)