Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men Going Their Own Way
As the creator of the article, I am not interested in having a Wikipedia article about MGTOW ''just for the sake of having a Wikipedia article about MGTOW''. If the article does not ''correctly'' and ''completely'' explain MGTOW, detail the various gradations within MGTOW, and contrast it with unrelated men's groups, explain its ''equivalence'' with the herbivore men, and its equivalence with the marriage strike/boycott, then I don't even see the point in having an article.  If it makes any difference, the near-consensus of the MGTOW outside Wikipedia with whom I've discussed this is agreement with my '''delete''' vote here.  Editors who know nothing about the subject have somehow decided that MGTOW has nothing to do with the herbivore men, or with the marriage strike/boycott, even though ''MGTOW themselves'' and ''Herbivores themselves'' (such as  Kyojiro Kagenuma) disagree.  The Helen Smith book is an excellent source, but you have decided that it cannot be allowed.  The majority of the Google News articles are useless and only show up in the search results because someone mentioned MGTOW in their comment sections. The fact that you have removed everything from the article ''except'' "'''criticisms of MGTOW'''" is clear example of  weight, intended to make it appear&nbsp;as if MGTOW are merely "https://www.mgtow.com/shaming-tactics/ men who whine about women on the internet".  You also do ''not'' consider Milo Yiannopoulos to be a reliable source (but ''do'' consider the VICE article to be a reliable source, even though the latter is clearly a poorly researched, heavily biased journalistic hatchet job, intended to mock MGTOW with  phrases such as "those tricky, tricky women"). If all this is the case, I instead prefer to wait several years, after a number of books about MGTOW have been written (as I expect), to make any Wikipedia article about MGTOW, or not to have an article at all
— User:MaximumGrossTakeOffWeight, 22:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)