Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janitha Hewawasam
nominator's rationale for deletion of this article may not be relevant for afd ie. "no secondary source since 2009", so? an article doesn't require "uptodate" sources for the subject to be notable, ditto for "none (sources) in English", although its nice to have english language sources to refer to, again does not preclude a subject from the enwp, as for "Fails ", doen't this mean the subject can't be non-notable due to not being known for just the one event? other editors have been saying keep due to meeting  which is fine, just like to mention at the top of , "conversely, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb which some editors choose to keep in mind ..", also the footnote added to the article is truly bizarre, i suggest it may be appropriate for the talkpage but not for the article page, anyway thanks for an interesting discussion
— User:Coolabahapple, 16:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:CRIN||WP:NSPORTS (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)