Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of senescence research
The topic seems |notable although some of the sources don't really fulfil .  The amount of general information shows that the topic is |verifiable and encyclopaedic.  As to the question of using pros, I much prefer pros myself but this timeline format is understandable and, for me, is well done
— User:Pmedema, 17:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)