Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donkey punch (5th nomination)
For no other reason than that following four failed nominations for deletion, a fifth nomination, without more, should be foreclosed. Surely some kind of claim preclusion can attach to that kind of consensus. Indeed,  states speedy keeping is appropriate if "the nomination was unquestionably vandalism or disruption and nobody else recommends deleting it . . . . Examples of this include . . . making nominations of the same article with the same arguments after they were strongly rejected
— User:Pop, 08:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SK (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)