Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institutionalized Riot Systems
although I do see discussion of the term on g-scholar, it's not a lot for a term put forward in a 2004 book, and, a term that, according to comments above, was used in even earlier articles.  More to the point, even where it is  discussed, it is the context of discussion of the originator's book.    applies because the gauge to judge whether a neologism is working it that it is being picked up by other scholars and applied to new contexts.  I see no indication that this term is being used outside of the narrow context in which it was put forward by the term's originator
— User:E, 17:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEOLOGISM (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)