Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GURPS Infinite Worlds
I've resisted saying somethig like this until now, but I think it's clear that the nominator is trying to make some sort of , but I'm not sure what it is.  I also feel that he's now reached the point of Wikipedia:Disruptive editing#Definition of disruptive editing and editors|disruptive editing, specifically in regards to "rejecting community input".  His nominations of articles for AfD, in spite of repeated assertions by many parties that Origins Awards are indeed notable awards http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Role-playing_games#A_call_for_assistance, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Role-playing_games#A_policy_for_RPG_notability (and promising "not to argue the point" on one occasion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Role-playing_games#A_policy_for_RPG_notability see end of section), and then nominating that same article for AfD anyway), are done in bad faith.  He continues to nominate articles, even though they clearly satisfy |notability guidelines by being award-winning games/game supplements http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GURPS_Illuminati_University_%282nd_nomination%29, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GURPS_Infinite_Worlds, and seems to try to argue that people who are in disagreement with him must be somehow connected to Steve Jackson Games, involved in some conspiracy to promote their products on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GURPS_Bio-Tech, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Role-playing_games#A_policy_for_RPG_notability.3F
— User:Craw, 03:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:N (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)