Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RapidVisa
Although it was made by a paid editor, this service seems to be notable. It has in depth coverage in |reliable sources. It passes . The specific criteria that could be contestable is whether or not the coverage is routine. I believe the coverage not to be routine, as the articles are not simple statements or notices that something is happening with the company. In fact, the article in The Colorado Springs Business Journal was published on Nov. 9, 2015, while the court thing was finished on Sept. 2 (at least according to what I understand of the source). Overall, this is definitely not routine, and I don't think that it is promotional either
— User:RileyBugz, 22:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:ORGDEPTH (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)