Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PWCT (software)
my gut said Delete) We relax our inclusion criteria for free & open source per #Reliability and significance of sources. That sidesteps the issue of whether the sources are RS or not (the Arabic language issue is moot). Most seem weak - 1. non-independent as they're interviews or appear to be rewritten interviews 2. Research papers may be borderline or fail "reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses" . That's somewhat subjective but per NSOFT is adequate for WP:N. The only issue left is platform - this being Windows, which shouldn't matter. I do agree with the spirit of Andy Dingley. The article is a mess. It comes across as  - do any editors need to disclose any ?  draftify to rewrite would be better than deletion, but that is 
— User:Widefox, 16:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NSOFT||WP:SCHOLARSHIP||WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:COI||WP:SURMOUNTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)