Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caps (drinking game) (relist nomination)
I presume that in referring to  you are specifically talking about "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information", point 8?  This says, I quote - ''Instruction manuals - while Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things, Wikipedia articles should not include instruction - advice (legal, medical, or otherwise), suggestions, or contain "how-to"s. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, video game guides, and recipes.''  An article on Caps has the obvious potential to contain a) history and evolution of the game, b) its cultural significance, c) appearances in books, on TV shows, in films etc, and thus is more than simply a collection of rules (it doesn't matter if these things are not there or haven't been completed: the fact is, they could be inserted).  However, the rules need to be included as otherwise it would be impossible to give a clear idea of the game - and I presume you are not arguing that the entries for Chess and Soccer should be deleted? A drinking game invented 14 years ago and still being played is definitely not something made up in school one day and forgotten the next term
— User:Vizjim, 11:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)