Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duhin Nanda
without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he's got better sourcing. There are plausible notability claims here, but there's nothing that's so "inherently" notable that it would entitle him to rest entirely on |primary sources instead of reliable ones — and no, the existence of one "alumni get jobs" article in the ''student'' newspaper of his own alma mater is not a notability clincher in and of itself either. The notability test for a person is not the things the article says, it's the depth and quality of the ''sources'' you can or can't use to ''support'' the things the article says
— User:Bearcat, 16:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)