Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Rivera
If the "items involving the law officer mentioned are backed up by the transcripts and reports", then cite them. Official court documents are legitimate sources. But if the court permitted certain evidence and testimony that is in dispute, then the reason and source of the dispute ''needs'' to be referenced. Also, language like "fabricated circumstantial evidence", "snitch story" and "fabricated confession" without substantiation shows "opinion and bias" and thusly violates , and potentially  . If you can cite legitimate sources that show the prosecution acted in bad faith, then do so and I'll withdraw my objection. But as it stands, this article cannot survive as is when http://www.robertrivera1.com and http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/r/rivera-helton_katelyn.html (both equally spurious sources) tell completely different versions of the events, but the WP article only chonicles one side
— User:Caknuck, 08:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POV||WP:LIBEL (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)