Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fine Young Capitalists
Article absolutely meets the |general notability guideline, with 14 reliable sources. Similarly, OP making the argument that is essentially  without the BLP bit does not affect policy. There is adequate sourcing for the article, and just because they've been embroidered in a controversy doesn't mean that they lose any of that notability. OP even admits this. {{tq|'Not notable outside of the Gamergate controversy'.}} They are notable, have met the GNG, and as such, meet the notability guideline. Full stop. There's no policy based deletion argument here. OP also makes an erroneous argument saying {{tq|There is no information in any RS's to indicate that this organization is notable enough for its own page, and the current content in the article is very -y to the GamerGate discussion.}} They've met their due coverage verbosely in reliable sources in due quantity, and COATRACK is an essay which refers to tangentially related to content added to the pages. It has no due weight in a deletion debate. Due to them overtly meeting the GNG, the page should be kept full heartedly. I also don't see much rush to delete Zoe Quinn, who is  presumably in the same category guideline wise as TFYC. In spite of BLP1E applying surely to their article as well, and appropriately; it is a biography
— User:Tutelary, 22:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Notability)