Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Conway (academic)
The text of the Wikipedia article does not explain why this academic is noteworthy. It's just a short summary of where he lived and the jobs that he has held, none of which alone is sufficient for . If the consensus turns out to be that his written works are sufficiently noteworthy, I think that it is necessary to explain why they are noteworthy in the body of the article. The article doesn't even say what David Conway studies beyond "theology" and "philosophy
— User:OtterAM, 19:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)