Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanlie James
It seems to me that, even as the article is now (as opposed to when this was nominated for deletion in good faith), it satisfies . The references to her work in King, Deborah K. (2010) and Barnes, Marian (2005) are both in books published by reputable academic publishers, and can be checked online. The same seems to be true of the Pedwell, Carolyn (2010) citation  as it's published by a reputable academic publisher, (though it may not be checkable online). And this is quite likely only the tip of the iceberg since googling "Stanlie James" (in quotes) gives 10,400 general results and 4,100 book results. This also makes accusations of possible self-promotion () seem pretty implausible - with that many books available she could presumably manage far more than just the 3 independent citations she has now (and the none she had at the time of nomination) if she were promoting herself. And the article was originally created, and has now been greatly improved, by one of our most experienced editors
— User:SlimVirgin, 04:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPF||WP:SPIP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)