Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mud and Blood 2
There are no sources presented in the article, from what I can see, which come close to being |reliable in WP terms, which are needed to |verify information and demonstrate |notability. I had a look for some via Google a few days ago and came back empty handed. GemCraft and Crush the Castle have been mentioned, while the presence of article X/Y/Z just confirms just shows that |other stuff exists, they can both be demonstrated as being notable. Gemcraft has been reviewed on http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/iPhone/GemCraft/review.asp?c=29374 Pocket Gamer and http://www.gamezebo.com/games/gemcraft/review GameZebo. Crush the Castle has been reviewed on http://uk.wireless.ign.com/articles/106/1067120p1.html?forwardform IGN, http://www.gamezebo.com/games/crush-castle/review Gamezebo and http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/Android/Crush+the+Castle/review.asp?c=22780 Pocket Gamer. The common denominator with those two games and the reviews is mobile gaming. Ever since the mobile gaming revolution kicked off a number of sites and magazines sprang up to cover them and existing game sites also started covering them. Browser games, flash games etc. have always had a very weak presence in the mainstream press, what little coverage there is can be covering several games in not-quite-enough detail for a WP article and very popular games are not given the coverage you'd expect they would. I have the same trouble, I'd love to create an article for http://armorgames.com/play/269/the-last-stand The Last Stand (almost 8 million plays on armor games), but there's naff all sourcing available
— User:Someone, 21:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N||WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)