Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucie Chan
without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when somebody can do better. GNG is not a measure of what an article ''states'' about a person, but of how well it |reliably sources the claim as true — but the sourcing here isn't getting her over GNG, as most of them are directly affiliated |primary sources, and the few that are actual media coverage merely namecheck her existence without being substantively enough ''about'' her to count as GNG-building sources. ''No'' gallery show, not even at the National Gallery, counts as an automatic free pass over CREATIVE if your only source for it is the gallery's own |self-published website about itself, or a mere blurb in an events calendar. An art critic actually ''reviewing'' the show would help make that show a data point in the notability column, but that's not what any of the sources here represent. (By the same token, a musician or band doesn't get over 's touring criterion just because concert listings calendars or the websites of the concert venues themselves can technically be added to show that concert dates happened — music ''journalists'' have to write ''editorial'' content ''about'' the tour, such as concert ''reviews'', before touring counts as notability. Not that NMUSIC is ''directly'' relevant to the notability of a visual artist, obviously, but the relationship between gallery shows and notability works the same ''way'' as the relationship between concert performances and notability: ''editorial'' content ''about'' the show, not just an event listing, is what it takes
— User:Bearcat, 16:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB||WP:NMUSIC (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)