Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITM Power
Not sure where "strong links" to government come from - and I don't see that at  as a notability criteria. I see a small company with a few press releases printed and local coverage. Nothing to say there is anything notable about it. I have asked W.D. for what specific  criteria it meets without response - the first two references given are clearly from press releases, the third and fourth are explicitly press releases, the fifth is a directory entry, the sixth is another press release, the seventh could be the basis if other good refs can back it up, the eighth mentions the company in passing - not significant coverage, the ninth is another press release, the tenth might be significant or could be another press release not as clear cut as some of the others,  the eleventh and twelfth are not significant coverage, the thirteenth and fourteenth are basically the same, and the last is a primary source. While there seems to be a lot of sources, there are very few good sources so fails DEPTH
— User:Noq, 23:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)