Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qantas Flight 32
First off, this has a ''lot'' of sourcing behind it, and for me goes well beyond the routine coverage mentioned in . The relevant guideline, then, is , which basically requires significant widespread coverage and lasting impact. The sources already in the article come from multiple countries and offer a good level of depth which should be sufficient for that portion, so impact is the only possible stumbling block. What we have is the grounding of two fleets of A380s (one still ongoing), discovery of faults in the type's engine design and modifications as a result, and serious shifts in stock market position of at least two involved companies. Whether that is enough to meet the guideline is open to interpretation, but I reckon it is
— User:Alzarian16, 18:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)