Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free republic of liberland
to {{ping|Mikispag|Giulioprisco|Dilbert}} As it happens, ''since'' this discussion was initiated, a large burst of attention has been given to Liberland, and it can reasonably be said to meet . In light of that, you've remarked that the deletion request was "premature" and such. I'm wondering, though, whether you meant that the request ''turns out'', retrospectively, to have been premature, or whether you meant that ''at the time this discussion was initiated'', it should have been judged to early to do so. In the latter case, I want to explain that we base assessments of notability on whether topics meet  ''now'', not on predictions of whether they will later. The deletion request was definitely reasonable at the time. As  explains, "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball
— User:Largoplazo, 15:26, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Notability)