Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Event of Moon Disaster
Perhaps because this is getting so much attention, in particular from being covered by reddit, that says something about the standards for what should be a stand alone article. The reddit exposure would not have happened without this being stand alone. Perhaps in the shifting world of social bookmarking/linking the encyclopedia standards for what is stand alone should shift also? I also agree that the current title for this article does not satisfy , I would rename it to be more encyclopedic but keep it stand alone and include a mention of it in the Apollo 11 article. This article is making me reconsider the degree to which rich topics like Apollo 11 can be handled in one long article versus links to smaller related but separate articles
— User:Owlmonkey, 08:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)