Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 404 podcast
One other thing I want to point out, and that is . This essay basically suggests that if a large percentage of this article, such as the inside jokes listing or the guest list, cannot for the life of it be verified by independent sources, the article can actually lean towards , where "the specific focus of the discussion may be that the article is a compilation of facts that reliable sources outside of fan-based reliable sources have not found interesting enough to publish." To paraphrase, others can  in order to boost the independent sources, but if these kinds of sources are overwhelmingly being used, then the article can be interpreted as not being notable. Sources outside of the clique should be talking about show
— User:Groink, 04:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FANCRUFT||WP:NOT||WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:Fancruft)