Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) (2nd nomination)
Thank you to the editor who added the {{tl|notvote}} template. Many of the recent "delete" votes are very weak. Several are just bare assertions, having not explained why the sources are insufficient. These are  votes (Capitalismojo, Czolgolz, and Galloglass).Guy's argument that "The lack of depth in coverage makes it impossible to ensure NPOV" is unconvincing. How does the article in its current state not comply with ?  should be easy to maintain. If non-neutral material is added in the future, it can be just be removed.Itsmejudith talks about the ''Metro'' being unimpressive, but she doesn't indicate why the ''Chicago Tribune'' 2006 and ''Wall Street Journal'' 2010 articles mentioned by David Eppstein are insufficient
— User:Cunard, 01:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)