Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mygodshot
The article's creator (who appears to have a COI) has stated that there are print sources available, however we would need to see them in order to see if they are independent and in-depth reliable sources.  sources (things released by the publication and/or people/organizations related to it) and  sources (one line or very short mentions of the project in passing) cannot show notability for the paper and given the complete lack of coverage for the project I have to assume that most or all of the coverage is either primary or trivial. Once this publishes and it gains the necessary RS it can be recreated, but not before then. Something I have to warn the article creator about (since they appear to have created this in all good faith) is that routine notifications and database type listings do not show notability, as it only shows that the publication exists in one form or another, which is not a sign of notability in and of itself. I'd recommend that if they're interested, that they work on a copy of this at fC in the meantime and I have no problem with this being sent to the AfC draftspace
— User:Tokyogirl79, 04:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:TRIVIAL||WP:A (Wikipedia:No original research)