Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
While clean up is certainly merited (a number of the sources I've managed to go through so far are, at the very best, barely capable of satisfying ), no one is arguing that this theory's existence is unverifiable, and it's certainly notable. I assume that the majority of those who have responded here have heard about the theory at some point. In my eyes, if the theory has gained enough credence that even my own government is taking the time to http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=August&x=20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355 respond to it, it's also got enough to warrant a WP article. The article itself is not inherently POV, and the "blatant soapboxing" everyone is referring to can be cleaned up by clearing the worst cruft and citing the rebuttals where possible. POV is always going to be an issue with articles on controversial topics, but AfD isn't the place to resolve it
— User:Philodespotos, 16:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)