Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert M. Bernstein
This one presents a tougher policy question than usual, in that it's hard to ignore the fact that Dr. Bernstein most definitely meets .  On the other hand, it's equally hard to ignore the fact that this article has always violated a core principle of , which is that "Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion".  It could easily have worked the other way-- a libelous or attack article about an otherwise notable person is just as subject to deletion.  In this case, I think the consensus is that this person, because of the use of Wikipedia as a means of promotion, fails the one ground of  that really is up to the editors' opinion concerning encyclopedic suitability-- "The topic of an article should be notable, or ''"worthy of notice"''; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to ''deserve'' attention or to be recorded."  If someone with no association with the physician's hair restoration clinic were to author a future article, the outcome might be different.  Ultimately,  trumps E
— User:Mandsford, 16:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOT||WP:PEOPLE||WP:NOT||WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)