Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stolpersteine in Neratovice
Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists #Appropriate topics for lists gives us good guidance on content of stand-alone lists: {{tq|"Some Wikipedians feel that some topics are unsuitable by virtue of the nature of the topic. Following the policy spelled out in |What Wikipedia is not, they feel that some topics are trivial, non-encyclopedic, or not related to human knowledge."}} The nominator is entitled to their opinion along those lines, but I will disagree: a reading of DIRECTORY (the relevant section of ) spells out seven classes of directories that Wikipedia is not: '''Lists of loosely associated topics'''; '''Genealogical entries'''; '''Yellow Pages'''; '''Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business'''; '''Sales catalogues'''; '''Non-encyclopedic cross-categorisations'''; and '''Simple listings without context information'''. There is no way that the list of Stolpersteine in Neratovice fits any of those groupings. In fact, it is clear from reading the amplifications given with each of those classes that NOTDIRECTORY excludes a very different sort of list from the one under debate. I would urge anyone uncertain about the place of this article in Wikipedia to read DIRECTORY  and see for themselves that is not an applicable rationale for deletion here
— User:RexxS, 13:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTDIRECTORY (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)