Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward H. Harlow
All soldiers in WWI do not automatically get Wikipedia articles because soldier; there has to be something ''substantive'' (and, even more importantly, |reliably sourced) to write ''about'' a soldier than "he lived, he died, the end". But there's no substance, and no viable sourcing, here — being the "last surviving veteran" of a war would be a much more credible claim of notability if he'd actually ''been'' to the war, as opposed to just loitering around Halifax as a reservist until that war ended
— User:Bearcat, 21:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)