Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hogtie bondage
Ok, I'm not saying it constitutes significant coverage, but google books suggests that there are books out there which do provide the kind of detail shown in the article - so I don't think its a case of , just a badly sourced but otherwise plausible article. See http://books.google.com/books?id=ZPP7NnFIPYoC&pg=PA98&dq=Hogtie+bondage&sig=cO7b0nPmuSDevpoA38PaczZeO6Y this for example, which alludes to the 'technique' whilst describing a different one. Ok, ew and stuff
— User:Tree, 03:28, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)