Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Douglas Scott
to Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion#The Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion 2010.  Even though the Queen's Award does confer some notability, there are guidelines other than  to consider.  For example, because all four of the sources cited in the article were published in the immediate wake of the award,  becomes relevant.  And so is .  Other than its discussion of the Queen's Award, all of the detail in the article is unencyclopedic -- where he attended university, his early jobs as a programmer and librarian, etc.  Brief biographical data and a quote from the Queen's Award booklet could easily fit in a list of the 2010 awardees.  By the way, the Financial Times profile was behind a paywall, so I didn't read it.  But it is used only once in the article, as one of two sources for a paragraph containing biographical detail.  Most of that detail could equally well have been sourced from the Journal article, so it isn't clear what additional information was being added by the FT profile.  And finally, I note that the article Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion (2010) already exists as a redirect to the article on the Queen's Award.  Perhaps the better solution is to expand that redirect article into an article on all of that year's awardees, where brief biographical sketches on each awardee can be included
— User:NewYorkActuary, 19:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOPAGE (Wikipedia:Notability)