Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Progressives (2nd nomination)
or '''userfy'''. Yeah, I'm going this way again. I still think our rationale needs to be that inherent notability for parties derives from registration ''and'' contesting an election (although parties can of course be notable without meeting this benchmark). The recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danig Party of Australia|Danig Party AfD, as well as the deregistration of http://www.aec.gov.au/Parties_and_Representatives/Party_Registration/Deregistered_parties/coke-bubblers.htm another never-ran by the AEC, further convinces me that this is the way to go. As for the sources, I see one source on a minor spat between two micro-parties, and a minor mention of same in another much longer piece, which is not enough for  in my view. In the event they make further news leading up to the election, and if and when candidates are announced and confirmed, we can reconsider. It may be appropriate to userfy the article in the meantime
— User:Frickeg, 07:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)