Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Guay
The Curbed source seems okay. I've read this exhaustive http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/realestate/keymagazine/21Key-Steele-t.html?pagewanted=1&sq=Lockhart&st=cse&scp=1 New York Times report on the source; NYT mentions: "''To create that balance of power, the information needs to be reliable, and Curbed has made strides in ensuring the accuracy of its reporting.''" That, combined with the http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/lifestyle/7587825/joseph-guay-elton-john-exhibition-human-condition Billboard source and exhaustive reviews on the subject's work like http://burnaway.org/review/joseph-guay-turns-photography-inwards-at-jackson-fine-art/ this make me tend towards ''Keep''. The subject, in my opinion, seems to qualify on GNG and perhaps more so on , having originated innovatively new concepts, which have been covered by multiple reliable sources. Of course, you are right. The article needs to be cleaned up significantly if kept. But this is not a TNT case. Thanks
— [[User talk:Lourdes|Lourdes]], 10:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NARTIST (Wikipedia:Notability)