Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Woods (dog)
I see numerous |reliable sources demonstrating the dog's notability, including the major U.S. sources ESPN and USA Today. You removed a lot of prose text and changed it into a list. This is an encyclopedia designed to be prose not lists - so you did the opposite of what you're ideally supposed to do. I saw little fluff material in the article before your removal. Earlier this year, I reviewed this article while it was waiting in the queues for |Did You Know and editing out some fluff
— User:Royalbroil, 02:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:DYK (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)