Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin
I went through and cleaned up the article a bit. IMO, the only two |reliable sources providing any sort of significant coverage are the first two, the Inforworld article, and the article from the Hartford paper (which also appears in another online newspaper). Those of you who have come here from the bitcoin forum should keep in mind that WP's policy is that blogs generally do not qualify as reliable sources, the exception being if a blog is associated with a newspaper or journal that presumably provides editorial review. Passing mentions, forum discussions, and the like don't carry weight. Also, if the article is deleted, the author can request that it be userfied (put into the user's own space), where they can work on it more. Deletion is not prejudicial--if good sources come up with time and are added
— User:Nuujinn, 11:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)