Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated
No point in time is ever good to have a deletion discussion. There's no point closing this early, there's certainly no  situation, and no consensus. If the situation is the same after the allotted 5 days, there will be a decision by an admin on consensus, most likely "no consensus" looking at things in their current state.  Looking at the stuff you provided above, however, it appears that the coverage is incidental - unless someone has that copy of Newsweek around (and even 1 article may not establish notability). Mentions in an article about Srac... aren't enough, and If we merged the article to "b5 and the internet", then it would just redirect there, where the article text could be read alongside other incidents of similar things. Also, with the debate bein open for another couple of days at least, it gives you plenty of time to cite the article, using these guidelines ,  and . If you want to message me on my talk page, I'd be happy to help you add citations to the article, and advise you on what sources are considered reliable etc, as I'm pretty familiar with full citations etc
— User:Toon05, 12:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SNOW||WP:REF||WP:CITE||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)