Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kirk
Sorry, but you have no secondary sources in the article that back up your claims that he meets .  The first criterion is that they are a significant expert.  Where is that backed up?  In the article you prove that he published and was reviewed by other academics in academic journals.  So has every other full professor in the world.  The second criterion is that they  are regarded as important - I don't see that backed up in any source in the article.  So on down the list. You need independent, secondary sources stating how and why he is notable.—&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Mus, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROFTEST (Wikipedia:Notability)