Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/南山 (2nd nomination)
WP:POINTy nomination; nominator is currently in a deep and controversial discussion at  and other places regarding a similar issue. As for why this page should be keeped, I would like to give an example of how important non-English search terms might be on the English Wikipedia. Following the days immediately after Roh Moo-hyun's death, the 노무현 redirect got http://stats.grok.se/en/200905/%EB%85%B8%EB%AC%B4%ED%98%84 more than 1000 hits. Non-native English speakers may use foreign scripts to search for things, and I think '''TBROKE|don't fix what ain't broke'' applies here. We have many non-English redirects like these, and these redirects don't seem to be hurting anybody so far, and do have their beneficial uses (from what I'm aware of,  does not dictate what can and can't be done with ''redirects''). Now, in the case of 南山, what do we redirect to? Redirecting to Nanshan would clearly neglect Japan and be biased towards China; redirecting to Nanzan would give a similar problem. Is the answer to this really to delete this page? Or, should it be to not fix what isn't broken? The English Wikipedia does ''not have a sole audience of native English speakers'': as the largest Wikipedia project, many non-native English speakers also use this project, and cases such as 노무현 and 南山 are beneficial in that it helps people who use these search terms. Keep in mind that English is the global language, and if a native Japanese speaker can't find what he is searching for on the Japanese Wikipedia, he might go looking for it on the English Wikipedia next (but may not know the proper things to search for
— User:benlisquare, 17:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UE||WP:AIN||WP:UE (Wikipedia:Article titles)