Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Vectis route 10
the three Southern Vectis route articles, no evidence of |significant coverage. '''Merge'''or possibly '''keep''' Wightbus route 16; two of the sources are primarily about the route, but refer to it as "rail link", no mention of route number. A separate article may be unnecessary, if this is all the coverage that exists, but there's information that can be added to the Wightbus article. WP:NOTTRAVEL isn't relevant, as the information is not inherently unsuitable, it just lacks evidence of notability. "Check the operator's website" is also a poor reason as these routes are defunct; the articles also contain historical information that probably won't be found there
— User:Peter, 18:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)