Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acting under a description
It does read like an essay to me, and I'd say it does breach  and  in its current form, as it includes a lot of personal judgment and opinion, rather than referenced statements made by notable people. Both of the references are links to other Wikipedia articles, neither of which mention the term "Acting under a description" (other than as a link back to this article) - it's perhaps a bit strange that the G. E. M. Anscombe article doesn't mention it. There are Google hits on the term, and I think it is a notable concept and a proper article could probably be written about it, but this one seems to be completely the wrong approach and I think "Delete and start again" would be the only practical way forward, as what we need is an encyclopedic article that describes only what other notable people have said about it, and no actual synthesis - if others haven't written such material, Wikipedia is not the place to start
— User:Boing, 14:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)