Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Smile in the Mind
Just looking at the sourcing in the article, it appears that the only usable source is the review from the http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/a-battle-of-wits-brings-out-the-buyer-in-all-of-us-20160216-gmu81d.html Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2016/february/smile-after-smile-in-the-mind/ Creative Review is a primary source (since it's a piece written by the book's authors) and the publishers' pages are certainly primary as well. That a primary source is trying to back up a claim that it's an essential book doesn't help it seem less promotional either. Offhand I'd endorse giving it a dose of  because it's so horribly promotional that it cannot be salvaged in its current state. I'm also blocking the editor {{u|Brandstrategy}} since a quick search shows that they share the same name as a marketing company. I'd recommend a look at all of their created pages to see if they're as equally spammy as this one
— User:Tokyogirl79, 03:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)