Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Me and the Orgone
When I wrote the article, I did so because I read that it is a very significant part of the ''orgonomy'' lore. I did get the impression, as Dhartung alludes to, that it was the object of much attention when it came out, which means that there is likely to exist several notable newspaper articles and op-ed pieces centering on it. Obviously I have not researched this (partly because I'm in Norway, and although I have access to both the national library and the Oslo university library, I don't know that they archive many foreign language newspapers. I could perhaps make an effort to find out about periodicals.). This conjecture would tend a good-faith editor towards concluding that the book probably does satisfy , but that the article presently doesn't substantiate this, and such an editor would most likely deem it sufficient to add an appropriate maintenance tag which would give other editors generous time to provide the lacking references. __
— User:Meco, 04:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)