Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Astrological Studies
I found zero gnews sources for this organization, which means notability looks very weak since it reportedly exists for over 60 years. A book search yields more results, but this are mostly astrologers mentioning that they obtained a diploma from this "school", so these are not really independent sources.  puts the bar rather high for companies and organizations, and I don't think we should put it any lower for astrological organizations. We don't keep articles about some exchange traded companies with 100s of employees, because they are not in the news. And here we are going to keep the article about a fringe organization that has never been in the news, just because some astrologers make mention of it in their book. Really
— User:MakeSense64, 06:46, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)