Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy Howell Rodham
You seem to have misread or misunderstood . Assuming good faith, I will not say you are misrepresenting it.  says  "Family members of celebrities also must meet Wikipedia's notability criteria on their own merits - the fact that they have famous relatives is not, in and of itself, sufficient to justify an independent article. Note that this also includes newborn babies of celebrities: although such births typically receive a flurry of press coverage, this testifies to the notability of the parent, not the child. Ordinarily, the child of a celebrity parent should only have their own independent article if and when it can be reliably sourced that they have done something significant and notable in their own right, and would thereby merit an independent article even if they didn't have famous parents." My understanding of this is that for the former First Lady's Mom to have an article, she should have "done something significant and notable in (her) own right" such that she would merit an article even if her daughter and son in law weren't famous. She has only been covered because of her relatives, thus she fails this guideline. Come back when she does something other than be a mother, mother-in-law and grandmother. Maybe she will write a best-selling book or something, other than just be along for the ride. The failure to satisfy  is exactly the same as if she were a baby of a celebrity. The press coverage derives from the famous relatives, not from her actions
— User:Edison, 02:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:INHERITED||WP:INHERITED||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)