Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bearpaw (footwear) (2nd nomination)
Entirely promotional, fails , fails GNG and . Reference listed by Tinton5 fail the criteria for establishing notability as follows: http://footwearnews.com/2017/focus/womens/bearpaw-men-in-high-heels-walk-a-mile-in-her-shoes-event-349594/ this footwearnews.com article fails  as it is based substantially on http://www.bearpaw.com/press/article-05012017 this PR from the company, same quotes too, and is therefore also a PRIMARY source with no independent opinion/analysis. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2015/02/prweb12513258.htm This prweb reference is a Press Release and fails  as it is not an independent secondary source. https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2011/12/14/bearpaw-footwear-store-citrus-heights.html This bizjournals.com article also fails  as it is also http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20111214005226/en/BEARPAW-Footwear-Opens-Retail-Store-Location based on a company announcement and is also therefore is not intellectually independent and fails the criteria for establishing notability. http://footwearplusmagazine.com/2010/09/qa/all-in-the-family/ The interview in footwearplusmagazine.com fails  and/or  as it is entirely based on an interview/quotes from the CEO with no independent opinion/analysis and is also therefore a PRIMARY source. Finally, https://www.justice.gov/usao-edca/pr/sacramento-area-businessman-charged-evading-56m-customs-duties-footwear-imported-china the article on fraud only mentions this company in passing. If the topic of this article was the CEO, this would arguably help to establish his notability. Notability is not inherited. This article is only a mention-in-passing and fails 
— User:HighKing, 18:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPIP||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)