Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megagon (2nd nomination)
It has gone from unreferenced to having numerous refs in the course of the AFD, Other than the first ref, the books and journal articles speak of a "million sided polygon" rather than specifically a "megagon."  But we are not the "language police," to delete articles because they offend some editor's sense of what prefix should be used with what suffix.'''Keep''' It has gone from unreferenced to having numerous refs in the course of the AFD, though it is not clear in every case what the depth of coverage is. The nominator's sense of the name being "incorrect" does not overrule numerous books from scholarly publishers such as John Wiley & Sons which use the term. We should follow what scholarly reliable sources use as terminology and not act as the "|original research language police
— User:Edison, 20:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)