Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bunny Museum
While  is certainly cause for concern, it is not an automatic criteria for deletion. While Candace Frazee may have been a major contributor to the article, I see several other people have contributed in major ways to it who have no discernible connection to the museum. I'm also finding plenty of third party coverage, including http://www.odditycentral.com/pics/bunny-museum-the-hoppiest-place-on-earth.htmlhttp://www.worldrecordsacademy.org/collections/largest_collection_of_bunny_memorabilia_The_Bunny_Museum_sets_world_record_101619.htmhttp://www.insidesocal.com/rose/2010/01/at-this-museum-bunnies-are-serious-business.htmlhttp://www.insidesocal.com/rose/2010/01/at-this-museum-bunnies-are-serious-business.htmlhttp://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/36023744/ns/travel-destinations/http://www.chicagotribune.com/travel/ct-travel-bunny-museum-032610,0,2070813.storyhttp://abcnews.go.com/Travel/wireStory?id=10198229. And that's just three pages into the more reliable of the Ghits. I see no reason to delete. If you feel it is promotional, improve it to make it less so. I personally don't see anything inherently promotional about the article
— User:Redfarmer, 23:09, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)