Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Wikipedia (4th nomination)
This (And the other articles) are notable enough to warrant separate topics about them. I don't see these article's as PoV forks, but rather as seperate articles to cover a certain aspect about the companies in question. These articles are simply to long to include into the main article, and are therefore forked. As far as i can see, the article comply to  more or less, and are properly sourced
— User:Excirial, 14:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)