Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wreathgate (2nd nomination)
to Jeremy_Corbyn#Foreign_affairs where it is already covered in roughly the same detail as the article. As we see over and over with Donald Trump and other high-profile politicians, countless events attract a ton of news coverage over the course of a news cycle or two. One one hand, GNG requires lasting significance such that we stay away from //. No evidence of lasting significance yet. Regardless,  is pretty clear that even when we do have a lot of sources, it's absurd to create separate articles on each and every sub-topic of things we already cover. This looks like a great example. What we're debating isn't whether to cover this subject, but whether we need to duplicate content across two articles such that it's covered under Corbyn's foreign affairs or needs its own article. To me this seems like a pretty clear-cut case of . I would say Merge, but it's already all there in the Corbyn article. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 20:29, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:DELAY||WP:NOPAGE||WP:NOPAGE (Wikipedia:Recentism)