Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Shaw (footballer)
borderline , however, I think there is enough coverage before the pie-eating incident to take outside of that.  The whole reason the betting incident took place was that he was a notably large goalkeeper.  That is covered in the article here http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/15098437.Meet_Wayne_Shaw__Sutton_United_s_Roly_Poly_Goalie/ and here http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/why-sutton-uniteds-roly-poly-goalie-wayne-shaw-is-not-your-stereotypical-goalkeeper-a3471551.html - both predate the match in question.  Think of it this way -  bets would not be offered on a non-notable person.  Even if you don't agree, he would have to be at least quasi-notable for best to be offered.  Otherwise, no one would bet because they would have literally no idea who the bet is talking about.  The betting scandal from the pie eating incident put him over the top.  It's  and not  (or maybe even WP:BLP1.5E
— User:RonSigPi, 21:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP2E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)