Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekahau Site Survey
I agree with the !delete comments above, no independent secondary sources to convince me of notability. The article itself is a mess as well, lots of the (primary) sources aren’t even about this particular product but are  for other products by the same company
— User:Cardiffbear88, 18:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)