Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven E. Wedel
Sorry, but this fails GNG by a wide margin. (That facebook post is almost a quote and something which faded from view without any effects). I'm not convinced that the subject passes . There is no evidence that the books written are significant - significant books actually receive secondary coverage. This is a minor writer who is getting some reviews for his book because he stays in the West and I feel keeping this article would be a pretty good example of . In other countries, local sources are often considered unreliable or sometimes do not exist. The way to solve systemic bias is to have objective standards. We don't keep minor writers from other countries and neither should we keep those from the West. In addition, the article is clearly being used for promotion
— User:Lemongirl942, 01:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:SYSTEMICBIAS (Wikipedia:Notability)