Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EFiction
I reviewed the interview at http://www.thekindlechronicles.com/ The Kindle Chronicles. The Kindle Chronicles page has a http://www.efictionmag.com/?ap_id=LenEdgerly personalized link to the eFiction website and is an affiliate of the magazine. The Kindle Chronicle interview falls under  more specifically, a conflict of interest because of its financial interest in eFiction. ALL the cited sources have questionable reliability (per  or  or ). Without any reliable third-party sources, the subject cannot claim notability (both under  as well as  which requires independent coverage "without incentive, promotion, or other influence"). If reliable third-party coverage can be found, the article may be able to establish notability, but as it stands now, I cannot see a reason to keep it
— User:Leavethelighton, 08:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:QS||WP:QS||WP:SELFPUBLISH||WP:SOURCES||WP:GNG||WP:SPIP (Wikipedia:Verifiability)