Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracker (video analysis software)
and merge verifiable content into Open_Source_Physics#Sub-projects, where it is mentioned. Tracker itself has coverage in several books and papers https://books.google.com/books?id=cQ92DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA41&dq=%22Tracker%22+video+analysis+software+-wikipedia&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3jsbQ-rzrAhVQGDQIHat-AAcQ6AEwA3oECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Tracker%22%20video%20analysis%20software%20-wikipedia&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=iLd9DgAAQBAJ&pg=PA167&dq=%22Tracker%22+video+analysis+software+-wikipedia&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3jsbQ-rzrAhVQGDQIHat-AAcQ6AEwBXoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Tracker%22%20video%20analysis%20software%20-wikipedia&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=JMbECQAAQBAJ&pg=PA497&dq=%22Tracker+video+analysis%22+software+-wikipedia&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjqh-K_-7zrAhWpGTQIHdF0A4oQ6AEwBHoECAQQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Tracker%20video%20analysis%22%20software%20-wikipedia&f=false,http://103.8.145.246/index.php/masshp/article/view/3283/840. There is probably enough depth for marginal notability, and keep is a reasonable outcome. But if the consensus is that it doesn't reach GNG, there is still plenty of verifiable material. Our policy  states that if possible, verifiable material should be preserved, not deleted. In this case, Open Source Physics is a notable project, having won significant awards, and Tracker is one of its main subprojects, so a selective merge and redirect is a reasonable alternative. Outright deletion goes against policy and is the wrong outcome in this instance. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
— User:Mark, 03:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)