Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Lodge of Iowa building
It looks like a significant enough institution for an article. In any case, nominating an article for deletion 19 minutes after it was created is truly ludicrous. I have no idea what the nominator was thinking! Equally ludicrous was his http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iowa_Masonic_Library_and_Museum&action=historysubmit&diff=420984964&oldid=420984077 deletion of a reference to the building's webpage citing "no self-published sources". What? That's not what  means at all. Of course an article can reference the organisation's own webpage to say when the building was built! This is a pure misinterpretation of the policy. When a building is constructed is a fact and there is nothing whatsoever that says that uncontroversial facts cannot be garnered from information published by the institution in question as long as that institution would generally be considered a reliable source. Change this and you would be deleting much info from a large proportion of our articles
— User:Necrothesp, 08:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)