Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millennium Items
Without any sources, how are we to say that anything in this article is verifiable, much less notable?  One primary source is cited parenthetically but numerous other claims--including claims outside the scope of the fictional primary sourcing--are made without evidence.  Several sections (and the lead) contain elements of original research (as of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Millennium_Items&oldid=225948612 this revision).  I'll try to remove some of the more blatant OR in a bit.  At the very least this article needs some inline citations referencing the storyline claims (ignoring the fact that  would suggest removal of most of the content here).  Also, every image used in this page claims to be released into the public domain as the original work of the uploader.  I |assume this to be the case but they look like they were pulled from a webpage to me.  Again, no sources, no verifiability, no article.  If we do find primary sources, the article still does not meet 
— User:Protonk, 22:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WAF||WP:AGF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)