Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magali Elise Roques
As I said at the DRV: {{tq|I looked up the subject, and I do not see any way that the subject could pass . If the retracted publications had all been legitimate, the record would still be one of an unremarkable early-career academic. (There is another Magali Roques, a cell biologist at University of Bern|Universität Bern, who is much more prominent than the philosopher on Google Scholar.) The plagiarism incident has not itself attracted significant attention &mdash; the ''Daily Nous'' post mentioned by {{u|FlybellFly}} is all I can find. Retraction Watch just points to the ''Daily Nous'' without doing a writeup of their own https://retractionwatch.com/2020/11/14/weekend-reads-hydroxychloroquine-champion-faces-ethics-charges-a-serial-plagiarist-in-philosophy-another-author-reaches-100-retractions/. This isn't enough coverage to warrant an article on the incident, and I'm highly dubious that the ''Daily Nous'' is a good source for  material, whether that content is in a biography or an article on an event. Maybe the situation will change, but right now I don't even see grounds to describe the incident within another article, let alone devote a page to it
— User:XOR, 19:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)