Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bell Canada
This is essentially a . The concept itself of criticism particular to this company does not rise to the level of . Negative press, which may be understood as critical by readers, does not necessarily ''report that there is criticism of the company''. Criticism may be implicit and topically relevant to the company itself, but criticism most clearly merits a stand-alone article when the ''topic of criticism'' of the company is what's covered. Contents of this article that are actually noteworthy should be folded into the Bell Canada article, even as its own ===Criticism=== or event-based subsection, as |due weight indicates. Not every bit of negative press will be of enduring significance; I expect a summary statement supported by several reliable citations would be sufficient
— User:JFHJr, 06:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK||WP:GNG||WP:WEIGHT (Wikipedia:Content forking)