Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earthworm Jim 4
Neutral. Strictly speaking, fails  as the product doesn't exist. That said,  does not forbid articles on future products with sufficient sourcing. So if one applies GNG for "announcement of EWJ4", then it kind of passes. I still think  should apply until there is an actual announcement (the 2008 one was later denied) by the IP owners or the contracted developer backed up by an in-development product. Most sourcing boils down to people wanting to make it and talking about it, but nothing real yet existing, just tons of rumors that are all denied. Current article (without directly using the quotes) could serve as a paragraph on development history if the game was ever made. I definitely consider content worth keeping, just unsure if it should be a stand-alone article or part of people's and developer's article. —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 15:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)