Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forestweb Inc
I have removed a long section on a lawsuit, which was totally disproportionate coverage in an article supposedly about a company, and which seemed to be use of the article as a . I have also removed a couple of spam links masquerading as "references" but not mentioning Forestweb Inc, let alone supporting any statements made in the article about Forestweb Inc. What is left is an unreferenced article about a company with no indication of significance or importance. In fact, it could be speedily deleted, in my opinion, but I am willing to let the AfD run its course. All the evidence suggests that this article was created for promotional purposes, in common with other articles created by the same editor
— User:JamesBWatson, 12:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)