Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/States Reorganisation Commission
Has the appearance of notability to me.  Per , I've cut out unencyclopedic content consisting of more than 90% of the article - what appeared to be a cut-and-paste from a Commission report.  That leaves the article as a stub.  I'd support keeping it in that form and seeing if it grows.  Regarding Akradecki's suggestion, I have no objection to moving the source material to Wikisource, but I can't find it anywhere online, so it's difficult to verify.  Is it a translation?  Who translated it
— User:Hyperbole, 22:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BOLD (Wikipedia:Be bold)