Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy King (2nd nomination)
Once notable, |a person is always notable, even if they become inactive, retire, or die. The article was kept |by a wide consensus in 2009. The article |has been improved considerably lately. Even |assuming good faith, I always wonder what |conflict of interest or |agenda an IP editor ''from https://www.robtex.com/?ip=131.172.153.147&whois=1 an unregistered IP'' might have, since they don't or can't disclose any interest, which especially is true when they have made few or no edits outside of this particular AfD and the subject itself is controversial. Wikipedia is |not censored and should not be. One last thought: I am particularly wary about deleting articles about controversial females, Gamergate|considering the recent past
— User:Bearian, 16:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:CCC||WP:HEY||WP:AGF||WP:COI||WP:SOAP||WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:Notability)