Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist terrorism (2nd nomination)
Nomination is completely without merit.  "Communist terror" turns up  18,700 google hits, "communist terrorism" turns up 6,980 google hits and "Maoist terrorism", just to use one possible additional term, turns up 1740 hits.  Of course search engine hits are just one indicator of notability.  In the U.S. State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, communist groups are only second to Islamic.  Plainly this subject is notable.  It has been used in the mainstream media,  see http://openweb.tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/1970-9/1970-09-01-CBS-23.html here and http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,837503,00.html?iid=chix-sp here, by http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-Singapor.html major encyclopedias, and in academic journals (http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0554%28197503%2969%3A1%3C306%3ATCATBC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-O&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage here, http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-5850(195804)34%3A2%3C157%3AMNN%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y here and       http://www.clemson.edu/caah/history/facultypages/EdMoise/atroc.html here.   Anyone who's heard of the Red Brigade, Revolutionary Organization 17 November|November 17 or FARC know it's communist terrorism; this article is plainly proper.  It is not a POV fork but a separate notable subject.  It certainly makes as much sense as the eco-terrorism, narco-terrorism and bioterrorism articles.   This nomination is plainly a case of  on the nominator's part.  If there is POV in the article that can be fixed and is not a basis for deletion
— User:Mamalujo, 23:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)