Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazons in popular culture
because contributing |firsthand observations to forward an argument is |synthesis.  There is no |significant coverage of this topic, only a list of |indiscriminate trivia items.  Per #DIR, "There is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contributed to the list topic."  The only problem is, the entries are not famous for having Amazons (except for Wonder Woman, it seems), they're famous for other reasons, and they are only loosely associated for having Amazons.  It is original research to support a topic by providing examples while saying nothing attributable about Amazons' presence in popular media.  Even if attributable sources existed, it would not warrant extra examples that are being uncovered by the editors themselves
— User:Erik, 19:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYN||WP:NOTE||WP:IINFO||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:No original research)