Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don R. Sommerfeldt
If this article actually contained ''substantive'' content about him, sourced to enough properly |reliable sourcing to support it, then I'd be completely comfortable voting to keep on  grounds ''regardless'' of any debate about whether the Tax Court is notable enough or not. But it doesn't — in its current form, ''all'' it consists of is a single sentence asserting his ''existence'', resting on a single |primary sourced confirmation on the court's own website. (And even that source just ''lists'' his name, without even giving him the standalone profile that some of the other judges have to provide more information about them beyond name, rank and serial number.) But that's not how ''any'' person ''ever'' gets a Wikipedia article — ''no'' Wikipedia inclusion guideline ''ever'' confers a notability freebie on ''anybody'', regardless of the "inherent" notability of their office, until '''reliable, independent''' sources can be added to support the claim. I'm willing to revisit this if the sourcing and content can be beefed up well beyond where they're sitting right now — but in its existing form, there's just not enough substance, and not a whit of valid referencing, here
— User:Bearcat, 15:25, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)