Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boring Bible
Can any of the keep !voters provide even one reliable source that provides significant coverage for this topic, the ''Boring Bible'' book series? I searched extensively, but they don't seem to exist. Sorry, but the arguments for article retention equate to  thus far, and are not backed with any sources to qualify the stance. Notice how custom source searches such as those listed below are providing no significant coverage. Just because a series of books exists does not automatically mean that said series is notable. Furthermore, a series of books is not automatically notable by virtue of being a series. As I stated above, it just does not appear that  or  is met at all, or even able to be met. Fact is, there is not enough coverage available in reliable sources to even properly |verify content presently in the article
— User:Northamerica1000, 14:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:BOOKCRIT||WP:GNG||WP:V (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)