Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossed Out
so this was never going to provable by the conventional in-depth coverage or normal  criteria. However, |BAND#7 or potentially |NMUSICOTHER#3 (a criterion I have never used) offer possibilities. But only if they can provide at least some minimal reliable coverage as {{ping|Adamant1}} notes. The current sources don't do that. But with https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kXyFAwAAQBAJ&lpg=PT4797&dq=powerviolence%20genre%20%22crossed%20out%22&pg=PT4797#v=onepage&q=powerviolence%20genre%20%22crossed%20out%22&f=false The Music Sound, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VnRbAAAAMAAJ&q=%22powerviolence%22+genre+%22crossed+out%22&dq=%22powerviolence%22+genre+%22crossed+out%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjemuTG667sAhWSoFwKHcHIA-AQ6AEwAXoECAMQAg maximum rock n roll newspaper, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=L77LoQEACAAJ&dq=powerviolence+genre+%22crossed+out%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjNmY_C6a7sAhW8SEEAHVo7Ai8Q6AEwBnoECAEQAg New York Hardcore (n.b. iffy about previews, keep trying) I feel they do. By all means, the coverage is light (but reliable, I feel), but that was always going to be the case for anything seeking to utilise these criteria
— User:Nosebagbear, 10:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BAND||WP:BAND||WP:NMUSICOTHER (Wikipedia:Notability)