Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delayed grief
The diff provided by the Magnificent Clean-keeper is concerning, and the Amanda Knox case seems to have been a principal motivation for the creation of this article. The "Examples" section as it stands hinges mainly on the (unsourced) assertion that Knox and "delayed grief" are connected, when the only Google web search result that includes both of these phrases happens to be the article that is the subject of this deletion nomination. A search for "Amanda Knox" and "delayed grief" in Google News yields precisely zero results, making the Knox paragraph |original research and |synthesis. The rest of the article is above the level of a |dictionary definition since it cites reliable sources, but on its own I would say that it is not enough to support a separate article when there is a prospective parent (Grief) into which it could be merged. While it is true that |there is no deadline for article development on Wikipedia, the same essay proposes that there is no rush to create a new article "until its significance is unambiguously established." "Delayed grief" is a notable concept, but for the moment, on Wikipedia, it could just be included in a subsection on the main "Grief" article
— User:SuperMarioMan, 14:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:DICTIONARY||WP:DEADLINE (Wikipedia:No original research)