Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMBnet.journal
Thinking about it, EMBnet.journal is more than just a name change, the publishing model greatly changed as well, so it can't really be thought of as the same journal. EMBnet.journal is verifiable and has at least one secondary reference, as noted in my comment above. While it may fall below threshold for notability, it is a good candidate for merging to EMBnet. As a relatively new journal, this topic has ; anyone recommending delete rather than merge should justify why deletion is necessary, as merge is the preferred action for such topics
— User:Mark, 16:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:POTENTIAL (Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state)