Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyrrho (RDBMS)
Thankyou for the comments.  My efforts in sourcing the Begg/Connolly book are currently on hold.  I can understand I did not previously question possible questionable independence of that source, though the wide distribution of said book might make the question to be asked on Wikipedia about Pyrrho.  The significance of the educational DBTechNet initiative do not appear to be appreciated here ... with Pyrrho bundled (probably) in the educational pack for ACID or OCC properties.  However in total strictness UWS is associated as a partner in DBTechNet.  Despite the developer appearing to be retiring ... which came to light to me during this nomination ... development by that person is likely to continue any we may yet be .  I had considered article content improvement but the loss or outside possibility theft means I am likely to forego that.  I could also possibly use some search resources down Portsea on Monday ... but Portsea for me is always iffy.  I have and am possibly considering a re-direct/merge ... though I know of no suitable existing target I would support ... attempting merge/redirect to Mimer SQL or VoltDB would be too disruptive to the target.  I am quite likely to initiate some form of save on Sunday or Monday.  Thankyou
— User:Djm, 06:30, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)