Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spring project
As persuasive as a tidal wave of , ,  and  arguments may sound, the subject still needs to receive ''significant coverage in |reliable secondary sources'' in order to satisfy Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Regretfully, I wasn't able to find such sources myself and I don't see anything concrete in the discussion above. Perhaps I really did miss something after all
— User:Rankiri, 03:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IKNOWIT||WP:BIG||WP:LOTSOFSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)