Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3dpaintbrush
I don't think the developer being redlinked is particularly relevant to the discussion but I agree with the sentiment to delete, and agree with 2's comment that there's a lack of good sources out there.  I find Pcap's reasoning sound.  I find some things in google news: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&source=hp&q=3dpaintbrush&cf=all but they seem to mostly be recycled press releases.  The articles seem to have only made minor changes to the formatting, suggesting that they essentially passed on a press release as-is.  This hardly qualifies as a |reliable source for establishing |notability
— User:Cazort, 21:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)