Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glyconutrient
Wikipedia content does not have to be true; it just has to be sourced ().  There are plenty of quack theories on the Wikipedia; it is appropriate to include traditional scientific viewpoints on these theories in the article.  (See IAHP and Orthomolecular medicine for examples.)  What's not appropriate is to censor these articles wholesale.  It's also '''definitely''' inappropriate to ram them through AfD with less than 24 hours up, and then close them with a "speedy redirect" when there was no consensus to do soand I '''strongly censure''' the folks who attempted that
— User:Ikkyu2, 01:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)