Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factlet
somewhat to my surprise). The Use–mention distinction|use of the word in media sources is not sufficient to |verify content or establish |notability of an article |about a word. However, this article cites pieces by William Saffire, Alex Madrigal, and Paul Brians discussing the word as a word, as well as a category of information. Given its brevity, and the brevity of (the non-example portion of) Factoid, the two concepts ''might'' be handled in a single article, but the content should not be deleted
— User:Cnilep, 00:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:N||WP:WORDISSUBJECT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)