Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homer Public Library (3rd nomination)
Look through past Afd , same nominator, same kind of starting "this is my library, but I don't think it should be an article, the the other people (after relisting once) managed to find sources. Then say GNG meet. Then closed as keep. This pattern is almost identical here. For clarity, let us just use normal GNG criteria. https://newspaperarchive.com/ryan-semendinger-other-articles-clipping-mar-11-1996-665354/ = AP ('''not local'''), one significant, independant source and that's it. Others are all dead links, trivial coverage. I will try to search Google till now https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=Homer_Public_Library&rlz=1C1CHBF_enSG790SG790&ei=8HPzWpGCJYK0vwTPy5GYAg&start=70&sa=N&biw=1366&bih=652 nothing significant I can find. 1 good source yes I cannot deny. For LEED, this is the page that should be added http://www.alaskajournal.com/community/2007-04-22/homer-library-awarded-leed-silver-certification#.WvN0XYiFPNM. Marginal source but LEED is an award that cannot be discarded. He is not  but just no solid arguments
— User:Quek157, 22:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FORUMSHOP (Wikipedia:Consensus)