Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebTrain (2nd nomination)
For an award win to confer notability in and of itself, that award has to be one whose announcements of its winners get covered by the media as a news story — if an award's own |self-published list of its own award winners is the ''only'' source that can be found, then the award is not notable enough to carry the company's notability. And outside of that, all we've got here is |primary sources, with the exception of a single news article which isn't substantively ''about'' the company, but merely namechecks its existence in the context of an article whose ''subject'' is the ''general'' field of e-learning — and that's just not enough to satisfy . And the article still has some PR overtones to it (frex, who gives a flying monkey what an unnamed provincial government bureaucrat said about it in a client satisfaction survey?) None of this, in other words, suggests or sources a reason why it's earned a place in an encyclopedia
— User:Bearcat, 18:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SELFPUB||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)