Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of backup software
We literally have hundreds of such comparison on Wikipedia.  Many software comparisons in Wikipedia have survived deletion.  I think the only reason why this may not is because it is essentially a very new stub.  There is no reason that these need to be based on original research--there are  that describe the features of products & even  comparisons that may be used as a basis for the article.  Can those calling for deletion please say whether they would support recreation of this article, assuming that it was more comprehensive in the products and features that it included and assuming that it was properly sourced
— User:Karnesky, 14:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)