Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Admission to an event or establishment
The topic is notable as various aspects are documented in detail in sources such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TQ1l3CKiT_0C&pg=PA135 Professional Event Coordination'', ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1n8oG9zAEg4C&pg=PA1244 New York State Sales and Use Tax Law and Regulations'' and ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zwf-Ofc--toC The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission And Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, And Princeton''.  The dicdef claim is confused per , "''One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written. Another perennial source of confusion is that some paper dictionaries, such as "pocket" dictionaries, lead editors to the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent
— User:Colonel, 22:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)