Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleveland steamer (4th nomination)
Although it is gross, and dubious in ever having actually occured, it is a widely known and used term.  If references are needed ... oh God, I don't want to have to look any up ... eww.  Nonetheless, it passes  with flying colours, and any other standard I could require it to uphold.  If you don't buy the citations, that's one thing, but I'm sure it'll be easy enough to dig up ones everyone can agree on
— User:WilyD, 20:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)