Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Beesley (3rd nomination)
the best next thing would be Angela taking an important decision based on this article not being deleted, so the article could say it, and doing so, self-reference not merely WP, but itself! "blablabla because of this article not being deleted from Wikipedia." References could be added pointing to the AfD discussions. At least, that would be encyclopedic, being related to the cause of her "notability": WP. That is, it wouldn't be '''trivia'''. BTW, anybody knows what's the name of her pet? And anybody heard about ? If in some years she becomes notable enough for someone to do a research about her (for, say, writing her bio), he would find the same info we've found about her, in the same places we've found it. And then, we could make a serious encyclopedic, third source, article about her. Don't fear for that info to be lost because of deleting our article. WP is not a log
— User:Euyyn, 07:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)