Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Wayne Williamson
The sourcing is not solid enough to get Williamson over  — his acting is sourced solely to his IMDb profile, which is ''not'' a source that helps to establish the notability of an actor, and the stuff about the coffeeshop is sourced entirely to specialist franchising industry newsletters, most of which just briefly namecheck Doug Williamson as a giver of soundbite in an article that is not ''about him''. And of the just two sources that ''are'' actually about him in any non-trivial way, both come from specialist franchising business newsletters which aren't widely distributed enough to bring the GNG all by themselves if they're the ''best'' sourcing he has — they'd be fine for use amid a ''mix'' of much more solid sourcing, but they don't magically clear the bar all by themselves if they ''are'' the most solid sources on offer. Neither actors nor businesspeople are automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just for having jobs per se, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have any better references than this
— User:Bearcat, 14:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)