Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatnik (programming language)
Your first argument is invalid – this article has been rewritten and its deletion history has nothing to do to with its present notability. And Google or other search engines don't return nothing. I can talk about the outline of sources, but let's keep the discussion objective. I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft%3ABeatnik_%28programming_language%29&type=revision&diff=711540887&oldid=593720861 worked hard to improve this article to fit these criteria and it https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beatnik_%28programming_language%29&diff=711680368&oldid=711656189 passed the |Articles for Creation https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beatnik_%28programming_language%29&diff=711656189&oldid=711655856 submission ({{ping|Hasteur|Anarchyte}}). We have 3 independent sources on this, so I would recommend to '''Keep'''. Here's the list of present sources
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AFC (Wikipedia:Articles for creation)