Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capillary Technologies
Considering that this is a Singaporean company, I find it extremely suspicious that it has not received significant coverage in the Straits Times (which is pretty much the only broadsheet newspaper here). That led me to look at the sources. Most of them are from Economic Times/Indiatimes which as we have seen here have often published redressed press releases. In addition to that, many of the sources are often routine news of merger/aquisition/product launch. There is not one good article which focuses on the company and explains why it is significant or what impact it has made. The sources are not good enough for  and . Add to that the promo pressure - the article is swamped by SPAs and so is this AFD (and I suspect undisclosed paid editing going on). There is absolutely no need to waste volunteer time on stuff like this - this is pretty much against 
— User:Lemongirl942, 03:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPIND||WP:NOTPROMO (Wikipedia:Notability)