Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul LaViolette (2nd nomination)
He satisfies  as normally applied.  The Patent Office case alone was covered in multiple sources, including a couple of articles in ''Slate'' that don't appear in GNews results (I see them in results using Nexis); I've just added a quote from one and a ref from another.  As usual, there are more sources than are available via GNews.  Sure, I could add them, spend hours working on this article, but it's not necessary for me to do so before I express the view that I'm well satisfied that the sources available establish notability.  And again he is not eligible for deletion on privacy grounds
— User:Nomoskedasticity, 19:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)