Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenText
Ping|Cmurphey80}} Ok, I'm really sorry that I rushed to conclusions based on your edit history without checking in depth. As far as notability goes, the guidelines require "multiple" qualifying sources. "Multiple" generally means more than one, and deletion discussions tend to agree that two qualifying sources are sufficient. In addition to the 2 qualifying sources in the article, it's easy to find more news stories by just searching for "OpenText" on Google, for example http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/opentext-s-120m-grant-hinges-on-creation-of-1-200-new-jobs-says-province-1.3092731 http://www.pcworld.com/article/2982491/opentext-pitches-big-data-service-the-first-in-a-planned-series-for-analytics.html http://www.cmswire.com/cms/information-management/opentext-targets-compliant-office-365-cloud-shift-otew2014-027154.php http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/07/29/opentext-survives-a-tough-quarter-as-shares-soar.aspx http://venturebeat.com/2015/01/05/opentext-snaps-up-document-collaboration-partner-igc/ &mdash; I believe all of these qualify for 
— user:intgr, 15:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)