Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rape of Rawalpindi
The article is no longer a one liner stub and nominator seems to be have mistaken as the article is clearly  because  states that ''To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term. ''. We cannot dismiss a wp:N|notable historical subject from 1947 such as this article as neologism when we not only have several books discussing about the topic https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Rape+of+Rawalpindi%22 but even have a book exclusively on this subject with the same title
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEO||WP:NOTNEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)