Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classicide
I agree with the nominator that the term is not an internet neologism.  would only apply here if there were no reliable secondary sources with material ''about'' the term (rather than just using the term). The term is used in relatively few sources because it is a narrow term competing with others in a specialized field: genocide studies. However, the google search link above shows that it has a number of sourceshttp://books.google.com/books?id=E0N9AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT43&lpg=PT43&dq=%22Classicide%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=IiHSJJarS2&sig=OMMA4IcBZsjyj-MTVAPqreHezNU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cE47U-noJrLksASVwIH4Cw&ved=0CGUQ6AEwCw#v=onepage&q=%22Classicide%22%20-wikipedia&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=oGqTqgueMt8C&pg=PT65&lpg=PT65&dq=%22Classicide%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=uaSkgc3gXg&sig=WDOr3d3JaF5nmmHDPXFHtRIt-kY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cE47U-noJrLksASVwIH4Cw&ved=0CGAQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22Classicide%22%20-wikipedia&f=falsehttp://www.massviolence.org/Classicide which meet Wikipedia's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline Notability criteria of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (that is, sources which address ''"...the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a passing mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material."''). I would have made this into a redirect to Mass killings under Communist regimes myself, but there is enough material out there for an article
— User:AmateurEditor, 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)