Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming
While I agree there problems with people trying to puff it up, and the inclusion criteria could be improved, yet it is a place where the generalized notion of "there are LOTS of scientists who disagree" is particularized as ''these'' "scientists". And that is very useful for seeing who they are, what kind of records they have, and the generally pathetic nature of the "lots of scientists disagree" argument. As to "{{tq|no value in a list like this}}" because these aren't "real" scientists, or their statements are out of date: well, yes, that is the nature of ''every'' such list that the deniers have prepared or alluded to – these are not serious scientists, etc. Indeed, the main reason this list has gotten as big as it is because the deniers keep wanting to add to it. As long as the denialists argue that "there are scientists who disagree" with the mainstream view a list of such scientists is notable, and we should retain it. It is not |''UN''DUE for giving an inflated view of how much doubt there is, it is ''entirely''  in showing how thin and weak is this alleged doubt
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:DUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)