Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of traps in the Saw film series (3rd nomination)
it's not "original research" to summarize a part of a film. And there is no policy against "trivia." And  never had consensus to be added to policy anyway. There are plenty of film reviews regarding the ''Saw'' series and I'm sure many of the reviews mention the traps. This article adds to Wikipedia's coverage of the ''Saw'' series, and it can be improved through normal editing. It's not a hopeless case. There was no consensus to delete in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of traps in the Saw film series (2nd nomination)|second AFD. I'm certainly interested in what Stifle meant in the second AFD when he said "Per the general weight of comments" since nine people who said delete used the word "cruft" (as in, "I don't like it
— User:Pixelface, 21:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PLOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)