Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin Pei Ling
As another Singaporean, I must say I am just as astonished by this nomination, and that the only way some people would push for its deletion is to cite some wikipolicy and attempting to follow it to the last without realising just how ridiculous this whole thing is. At least be consistent in your arguments. First, some of you argue she falls under  for "being a politician", and then some of you argue she does not qualify under  as she is just a nominee. So if she does not qualify under , why threat her as a politician? If we are going to follow rules to the last, let us split hairs, shall we? If she does not qualify under , then I am pretty sure both she and Nicole Seah qualifies under the basic rules of  and . Finally, while I do not support the above admins behaviour which would be considered rash, I can sympathise with his frustration, and the general frustration many editors from smaller countries feel when casual, obviously not very informed individuals simply flag articles for non-notability just because they do not know much about what happens in other countries, and who do not seem to take the very basic initiative of at least doing a google search, which garnered a whooping 1,110,000 results. If that do not amount for  for a country of only 5 million, I do not know what else qualifies. Make her run for the US presidency
— User:Huaiwei, 16:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POLITICIAN||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)