Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proton pack (2nd nomination)
a supposed "user interest" is 1) perfectly unquantifiable (to what do you compare it? which tools were used? etc), thus unreliable and unusable in an AfD, and 2) derives from  and thus is completely useless here. An article isn't kept just because undefined "users" updated it, but because it passes the |general notability guideline in that it has a significant coverage in independant third party sources, which is not the case here. You refer to "sources" that don't exist and don't appear on the article...you don't use imaginary "sources" to keep an article. You claim  "arguably become a notable topic", but I don't see any argument in favor of this
— User:Folken, 21:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)