Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyle Stevik (3rd nomination)
Besides the reasons given above and in the two previous '''lopsided''' AfD discussions, the unsolved nature of this case adds to its notability. What's the point of re-nominating if you're only going to repeat the same failed arguments from the previous two AfDs? That's what  is saying not to do
— User:Dennis, 14:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)