Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Focus
for now: The song ''Dance with Me'' hit the chart (week of 04-07-2018) at #47 (top 100) and climbed to #36 (week of 04-14-2018) in one week. I am NOT a fan of Wikipedia:Recentism|'''recentism''' or Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Breaking news|'''breaking news''' as we shouldn't rush to create articles ---but--- then we shouldn't rush to delete them either. I also think that any exclusion to |GNG cannot over-ride the criteria and mandate concerning a  so care should be used when a person is involve. This becomes Wikipedia problematic when an article is actually a |pseudo biagraphy. In this case we have a VERY poorly written "wanna-a-be" biagraphy of a newer artist than can be fixed by edits. Notability can be established by the chart records and the https://www.google.com/search?q=Dance+With+Me+with+Chad+Focus&oq=Dance+With+Me+with+Chad+Focus&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.5667j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Dance with Me video but the there would be concerns of violating . The artist also has the video http://rapxclusive.com/new-video-chad-focus-troyse-cito-g-flames-get-to-the-money/ RapXclusive (video): ''Get to the Money'' by Chad Focus and there is a http://hiphoprapscene.com/new-music-chad-focus-dance-with-me-featuring-raeliss/ Chad Focus bio (Hiphoprapscene). I think there is enough sourcing to present notability even though it really was  to create the article. The options now would be to leave as an article, Wikipedia:USERFY|userfy, or place in a Wikipedia:Drafts|draft. I would classify this a a "too soon" but let's "wait a while and see", since it is here, and I think wait and see is justified
— User:Otr500, 03:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:PSEUDO||WP:BIO1E||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)