Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cream (software)
I'm confused, wouldn't a user with an emacs (not a vim) button have a POV problem? But I guess, you are saying there is an "editor war" between vim and cream just like between vi and emacs? Anyway, as long as this won't help with , it shouldn't matter. The articles on itworld.com and linux.com (http://open.itworld.com/nl/lnx_desktop/09262002/http://www.linux.com/feature/61971) mentioned in the article are both non trivial, reliable sources, as far as I can tell, so no reason to delete the article because of notability concerns. There's also quite a few somewhat more trivial mentions turning up in google, e.g. http://www.linuxlinks.com/article/20070701111340544/Equivalents.html lists it as one of two possible linux alternatives to notepad and describes it a bit. Likely more can be found. Of course, the article is just a stub and could need some work, so I'd also see no big problem with merging and redirecting this to the vim article - no AfD needed for doing so though
— User:Allefant, 11:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)