Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis 1:4
The page contains very little commentary, and even that reads like obvious . It would be possible to create an article, but this is not it. I cannot even see any point keeping the page history behind a redirect. I voted to keep Genesis 1:2 after it was expanded, but unless Genesis 1:4 is improved shortly then it should go
— User:Fayenatic, 12:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)