Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisha Harris
without prejudice against recreation in the future if her sourceability improves. Nine of the eleven footnotes here are |primary sources that are not support for notability at all — staff profiles on the self-published websites of her own employers, content where she or her father is the bylined ''author'' of coverage about other ''things'', etc. — and another just briefly namechecks her existence as the compiler of a listicle without being ''about her'' to any non-trivial degree, and still comes from her employer anyway. And the one source that actually is both about her and relatively independent of her comes from a |blog rather than a real media outlet, which means it's not a magic key to passing  either. As always, the notability test does not hinge on the ability to verify facts in primary sources, it hinges on the ability to show that she's been the ''subject'' of coverage in |reliable sources (media outlets she isn't directly employed by, books, etc.) ''about'' said facts
— User:Bearcat, 16:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:BLOGS||WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)