Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Lutz (2nd nomination)
The notoriety mentioned in the last debate seems to be that he has been mentioned in newspaper articles. If everyone ever mentioned in newspapers articles had a Wikipedia page, there would be a lot more entries. There are no awards or accomplishments of merit listed. I don't understand why the last one ended with no consensus. The arguments certainly seem to favor deletion. Every pro argument seemed to have rampant speculation or personal opinion. There is clearly not enough citations or reliable evidence to warrant keeping. While he may be notable to Disneyphiles, this is Wikipedia, not DisneyWiki. 
— User:sig1068, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)