Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiff's Treats
Many of the sources cited here are independent, third party newspaper offering factual information about this organization. Cunard makes this point above. We must be very careful when evaluating what we believe to be "quality" coverage and, instead, focus on the source. For instance, The Austin American Statesman is a legitimate newspaper. They made the clear editorial decision to include this organization in their coverage. While we may disagree on the tone of the piece itself, we cannot make a judgement about the editorial decision to cover what the newsroom believes to be a notable organization. They made a decision to feature this organization in their newspaper. The same could be said for the Dallas Morning News, Nation's Restaurant News, The Atlanta-Journal Constitution, and others. If the standard for  demands citations from "reliable," "independent" and "objective" sources, that standard has been met here. Moreover, the inclusion of this organization in a book-length piece further supports a claim of . Starting a discussion that challenges the editorial decisions of an independent, third-party source opens up a standard that is extremely difficult to sustain
— User:Coffee312, 20:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)