Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Till Kraemer
I will attempt to help build consensus, as this discussion caught my eye due to the repetitive arguments supplied by Mr. Kraemer. I agree with the "delete" voters above on the lack of |independent and reliable coverage. Kraemer certainly appears in a lot of online media but it is largely self-promotional and unreliable, and no longer eligible for notability after the recent rejection of the  standards
— User:doomsdayer520, 21:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:PORNBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)