Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryo Hazuki
as lacking significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, thus failing . There's some trivial coverage here, but that's not enough to pass . But good enough for a redirect, perhaps with a sentence or two. No prejudice against splitting this character out if there's enough reliable third-party coverage to support something non-trivial, that isn't just filled in with |original research from primary sources
— User:Randomran, 02:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)