Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of disputed supercentenarian claimants
and only weak, because it's probably covered elsewhere in our 110 articles about people who have reached the age of 110.  Keep, however, because it's well-sourced, a rare quality in a Wikipedia article.  If not, then remove the unsourced or questionably sourced content.  I doubt that a nomination of supercentenarian will go far.  Regarding comments about deleting the whole thing because it's a "BLP minefield", the "L" stands for "living", and only the 30 or so persons listed at the top are alive.  I tend to agree that WP:BLP would apply to the living ones-- the inclusion of their names on the list is a statement that they are liars; worse yet, the accusations seem to come from ''websites'' rather than published sources.  Not all of this is a case of .  Opinions that the whole thing is of no benefit are just that, opinions
— User:Mandsford, 23:36, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)