Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Croman
I don't agree with the nom's rationale being one-sided. Being one-sided is not a valid criterion for deletion, that's a  issue.  This article is, however, something that could have been speedied per A7.  Article was created and edited by a single-purpose user.  It's borderline adverising and I'd wager it's personal fluffery. Kill it with fire
— User:Roodog2k, 15:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SOFIXIT (Wikipedia:Be bold)