Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samurai Baby
Well currently common sense say that not much in the article can be proved. What can make me believe that the informations are accurate, point of view neutral & containing no original research? Third party RS coverages are here to ensure that and not just that the article can be kept. As far as it can go the article can be "near-emptied" with a strict reading of |verifiability policy. I prefer no article than empty husk while some editors like to collect them like seashells
— User:KrebMarkt, 06:07, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)