Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AJ Mattioli
While I do share the concerns expressed above about whether the nominator is acting in good faith or not (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/More of Our Stupid Noise (2nd nomination), in which I expressed doubts about the same editor), the sourcing here just isn't cutting it. By far the majority of the footnotes are |primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and even the few that are real media mostly still just namecheck AJ Mattioli's existence without being ''about'' AJ Mattioli to any non-trivial degree. There's only ''one'' source here that's substantive enough to start getting us somewhere, but that's not enough all by itself, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to ''exempt'' AJ Mattioli from having to have a lot more than just one notability-building source
— User:Bearcat, 20:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)