Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Agents
While {{u|4meter4}} has mentioned a possible book reference above, it is only a single reference and therefore does not meet the criteria for "multiple" references. Also, I am hesitant to accept it as a good reference because the indications are that 4meter4 fails to understand the criteria for establishing notability. It is not simply a search for |reliable sources as stated above. References must provide |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content - the definition of Independent Content can be found at . Of the other references put forward, https://www.thebookseller.com/news/literary-agency-acquires-music-company-311537 this from The Bookseller is based on an announcement and fails , https://deadline.com/2018/10/marnie-podos-united-agents-uk-management-under-new-mgmt-1202481567/ this from deadline.com and https://www.screendaily.com/news/how-the-uk-production-boom-is-changing-the-way-londons-literary-agents-are-doing-business/5142150.article this from screendaily.com are mere mentions-in-passing and fail , https://deadline.com/2018/03/anonymous-content-casarotto-ramsay-united-agents-chapter-one-sophie-gardiner-steve-golin-1202338391/ this from deadline.com is based on a company announcement and is only a mention-in-passing, fails  and finally https://www.standard.co.uk/news/the1000/the-progress-1000-londons-most-influential-people-2019-media-agents-a4246971.html this from the Evening Standard describes one of the founding agents of the company but provides no information on the company, fails . I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and 
— User:HighKing, 13:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)