Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Searles Valley Minerals Inc.
I agree that most of the sources, while certainly ''reliable'', are mostly trivial and useful only as references for facts documented in the article.  The L.A. piece certainly seems in depth enough to easily meet the minimums of , however.  I don't see anything what-so-ever that is promotional or non-neutral in the article
— User:Kuru, 22:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)