Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prostitutes in South Korea for the U.S. military
per . This is a notable topic, but the article is POV-pushing train wreck. As some examples from a single paragraph, it states that "Former South Korean prostitutes remark that they have been the biggest sacrifice of the South Korea-United States alliance" - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/08/world/asia/08korea.html?pagewanted=2&_r=3&sq=Comfort& the source specifically attributes this remark to a single woman. "The women also see themselves as war victims" - http://koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2896741 the source is clearly referring only to the views of a group of 60 women. "They are seeking compensation and apologies" - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/08/world/asia/08korea.html?_r=2&scp=8&sq=Comfort%20Women%20Korean%20War&st=cse the source is also clearly talking about the views of a group, and not all as this implies. Earlier in the article it's stated that "Second Republic viewed prostitution as something of a necessity" - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/08/world/asia/08korea.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2&sq=Comfort the source states only that "Transcripts of parliamentary hearings also suggest that at least some South Korean leaders viewed prostitution as something of a necessity", and so does not support such an unequivocal statement. The article also contains the difficult to believe statement that "During the 1960s, camp town prostitution and related businesses generated nearly 25 percent of the South Korean GNP" - http://koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2896741 the source carefully attributes this to the view of a single academic, but that's been left out here. A fair amount of material is about prostitution in South Korea in general, so it's unclear why it's here. I'd note that the author of this article has also been engaging in similar POV-pushing in the Recreation and Amusement Association article. Much of the text in this article is only slightly changed from the sources, so I suspect that this should also be deleted on copyright grounds
— User:Nick, 11:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)