Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Massoud Tofangsazan (2nd nomination)
the separate sources from the Daily Mail, BBC News and Times Online constitute multiple non-trivial coverage in third-party independent sources per . Therefore, this individual is notable. I don't see how this could be construed as an attack page either; it's not the role of Wikipedia to make subjective judgments about what might have "seriously damaged a person's life" or whether events are "embarrassing". This article is an accurate and factual report, containing no libel, and is sourced to third-party reliable media sources
— User:Walton, 19:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)