Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure (motorcycle)
I agree the current article is |original research (I tagged it as such before it was nominated for deletion); it is also |unreferenced. However, I think the subject matter is WPN|notable. A quick Google search threw up a number of |reliable sources referring to adventure motorcycles: http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults/First-rides-tests/2010/june/jun1010-top-ten-adventure-bikes/, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/motorbikes/8950917/Kawasaki-Versys-1000-review.html, http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/Leicestershire-firm-Triumph-Motorcycles-reports/story-14019224-detail/story.html, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WM8DAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&dq=%22adventure+bike%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=M3rqTpTfGdP24QShreGlCQ&ved=0CHMQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=%22adventure%20bike%22&f=false and so on. Its clear that "adventure bike"/"adventure motorcycle" is an accepted term in the wider world, and as such is a valid subject for a Wikipedia article. All that said, the current version of the article needs swift and substantial improvement so it is written based on proper sources, not on what one editor believes
— User:Sparthorse, 22:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)