Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Urantia Book related articles
or break up into separate AfDs at a minimum. This strangely formed AfD is from an editor who refuses to talk on the article talk pages to have his concerns addressed, and instead has been edit warring to blank out these pages for several days.  The reasons listed for AfD are "walled garden", which is from an ''essay'' he or she found, not any policy, and "POV fork", which is not at all what any of these articles are.  Meanwhile there hasn't been the slightest word from the nominator on what his or her POV concerns ''actually'' are, only page blanking.  He or she is saying that people have been " advocating for their perferred content".  Not true, people have been advocating for ''discussing his or her concerns on the talk pages'' and not blanking articles. I totally disagree with how these four different pages are all lumped together and rushed into AfD in this situation where the nominator has been so antagonistic on a topic and hasn't made more than the briefest effort to engage with the editors who know the topics sources.  The nominator hasn't evidently read the talk archives, read the sources, hasn't read the book that is the topic of the main article, or even apparently read the main article itself, The Urantia Book, which shows clearly two of the above articles branching from subtopics according to  despite his claim that somehow they didn't
— User:Wazronk, 19:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SS (Wikipedia:Summary style)