Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of specialist photographic suppliers
per . See also  -- the answer to the question, "Why is this useful?" is that it will tell someone where they can find ''current'' purveyors of a service they need. It's a shopping guide. You could somehow rethink this so that it includes photographic businesses that are ''notable'' for providing unusual services, and don't limit the scope to exclude defunct companies, it might become encyclopedic. But I'm not exactly sure what that solution would look like. Could be moved to user space for more work
— User:Dennis, 20:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:USEFUL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)