Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abeir-Toril
as usual I see none of the "''significant'' coverage from ''multiple'', ''independent'' reliable sources" that  requires for a topic to be notable. In the article, source 1, 2, 3 and 4 are trivial and are actually first party and thus non-independent (Tom Costa wrote for WotC, Brian R. James's work has been bought and distributed by WotC, ''Dragon'' magazine is an official D&D publication, and Jeff Grubb is a TSR/Dragonlance/Forgotten Realms writer). Concerning sources that have been brought up here, ''The Fantasy Role-Playing Game: A New Performing Art'' merely mentions "Abeir-Toril" within a description of a gaming session or plot summary and is thus ''not'' a "significant coverage" (actually not a coverage at all). ''Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide Chronicles the World’s Epic Changes'' is even worse since "Abeir-Toril" is only mentionned as part of the description of the reviewed book's content. I don't see how anyone, except devout D&D fans, of course, could say anything different
— User:Folken, 19:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)