Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emperor Entertainment Group
as blatantly promotional and excluded by . The question of whether or not they meet the general notability guideline does not matter in this case as it is not the sole factor as to whether or not we keep an article. Cunard's sourcing does not demonstrate that these are essential articles to the encyclopedia, and , the overarching guideline that the general notability guideline is of but one part, makes it abundantly clear that passage of the GNG alone is not enough for inclusion: the articles also must pass the ''policy'' of . In this case you have lovely descriptors such as {{tq|Dedicated to nurturing young talents, EEG is the cradle of many of the hottest artistes in the Hong Kong music industry. Artistes under EEG management are frequent award winners of the territories' various annual music award ceremonies.}} throughout the text of all the articles.{{pb}}In deciding what to do in blatant cases of failing NOT,  lists deletion as an option among others: my test for this is whether or not the Wikipedia article would likely be the most significant coverage a subject would have received, in which case promotional language with promotional intent would be a clear violation of our most fundamental principle |Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising platform. Having reviewed all of Cunard's sourcing, it fails this test for me, and the correct way to deal with this based on the principles of Wikipedia is deletion
— User:TonyBallioni, 14:43, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:N||WP:WHATISTOBEDONE||WP:5P1 (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)