Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Fluke
per  and . It's BLP1E because if Rush hadn't opened his mouth there'd be no article, and COATRACK because it's much more about the incident than the person, and always will be unless this person gains further notability. There are several arguments here that amount to "We should keep this article until we see if further notability is established". No, if further notability is established we can create another article. Since when was an article subject "notable until proven non-notable"? Another unconvincing argument: "She has Google hits from before the Limbaugh controversy", with an attempt to prove this by a Google search for sandra fluke -limbaugh. If you look closely at the http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=sandra+fluke+-limbaugh&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 search results, you'll see that most references are from the past few days, with a few from around the time she was just about to testify. The rest are mostly blogs
— User:Szyslak, 16:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)