Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Bradford (professor)
as non-notable.  He fails .  Regardless of whether or not he wants to delete the entry he doesn't meet notability.  His credentials are nothing special for a tenure-track asst. prof.  The controversy is essentially local -- this happens all the time where someone is denied tenure and claims he has been discriminated against based on race, sex, polical affiliation, sleeping with the dean's daughter, ''etc''.  Some of them have been discriminated against, others have not.  Some win, most don't.  He probably had a little more than his 15 minutes of fame because there are groups who like to push the point of view that conservative faculty are discriminated against.  I see nothing beyond local interest.  If he becomes a poster child for the Student Bill of Rights, then we can revisit the issue.  Right now, he's simply just another relatively anonymous former-assistant professor
— User:TedE, 05:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)