Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WORKSsitebuilder
This is a classic case of |conflict of interest. A company insider comes with the purpose of featuring their product in the best light, which clashes with the experienced editors' goal of building a neutral encyclopedia, leaving everyone involved unhappy. To save this article, the insider needs to quickly provide reliable secondary sources as noted in . As it stands, none of the references establish the notability of the software. The biased nature of the writing are betrayed by phrases such as "features you would expect" and puffy wording such as "extremely relevant", "highly personalised", "extremely strong" and so on. Without those secondary sources, this is |original research by the company's employees. ✤ Special:Contributions/JonHarder|JonHarder
— [[User talk:JonHarder|talk]], 03:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:SOFTWARE||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)