Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reputation911
nbsp; Easy search name, so results should be easy to repeat.&nbsp; I also found nothing on Google books and Google news.&nbsp; I saw no third-party independent sources on the first two pages of Google web.&nbsp; I also checked site:businessweek.com reputation911, because investing.businessweek.com is, in my experience, fairly reliable as an indicator of wp:notability, but this firm is not listed.&nbsp; I also looked at most of the references in the article.&nbsp; Note that some of these, such as the ones from NYT and Washington Post, have older accessdates, because they were originally prepared for the Reputation management|Reputation management article, so don't expect to find Reputation911 listed in those references.&nbsp; There are a couple of press releases.&nbsp; The only third-party independent source I saw was the one from Green Bay, and there is certainly some WP:GNG significant coverage there, but not a lot.&nbsp; lternative outlets is suggested.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 19:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:A (Wikipedia:Attribution)