Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Lubitz (3rd nomination)
per . Lubitz is notable for one thing only, and there is no justification for a separate biography. I am unconvinced that extending  via  is itself a valid reason to delete an article, but in this case it is unnecessary, since  covers the issue anyway. I would add that few of the keep !votes above appear to actually give an explanation for why encyclopaedic coverage of a single event needs to be split into two articles. How does it benefit our readership to split coverage in this manner
— User:AndyTheGrump, 16:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRIME||WP:BLP1E||WP:BDP (Wikipedia:Notability)