Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Iorio (2nd nomination)
per Xan's findings. The only real claim to something that might pass  in the article is the high citation count for his articles. But, at least as viewed in Google scholar, the citation counts are not that high (less than 50 max) and heavily larded with self-citations (the top entry in Google scholar, "The LARES mission revisited: an alternative scenario", is listed as having 45 citations but by my count only 3 of them are not self-cites; the next one "The impact of the static part of the Earth's gravity field" is listed as having 42 citations but by my count only one is not a self-cite. So the claim to #C1 fails, and what else is there
— User:David, 03:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)