Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadine Baggott
I originated the article, and I'd like to say now '''I'm NOT Nadine Baggott''' - I can't speak about some of the Anon's though who have "added" comments. I originally added an article because much as though I don't think she's the most wonderful or entertaining person in the world, a bit of investigation to me showed that she did pass  on at least two counts: ''The person has demonstrable wide name recognition; Commercial endorsements of demonstrably notable products.'' I also don't particularly like editors http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nadine_Baggott&diff=156605982&oldid=156289399|"grooming" articles for deletion - before making your mind up on this one, have a look at the edit history. I will also add one more point - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nadine_Baggott&oldid=105910518|my original version of the article has more references and seems closer to a better/more encyclopedic article: perhaps one of those unique articles which has deteriorated through co-operation; or just a refelction on her public view? Rgds
— User:Trident13, 20:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)