Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kea Wong
But weak delete. My take is Wong is a competent actor who works rather steadily, who has not had major roles, has zero contact with the press, or does not cultivate the press. I looked through twenty (20) SERP pages, using the minimal "web" filter (not the "news" filter) and basically found a few filmography-like sources from the NY Times, a film database, but not much else. No film reviewers commenting on how well she acted, no comments by her about film or TV or anything really, almost like she is an invisible actor? Does that make sense? So I am sensing she does not meet the |general notability guideline, although her filmography suggests she is a steady actor. Still, any admin closing this debate ought to take a good look at these http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Kea_Wong pageview statistics, with eyeball counts over 1000 in one day recently, so there may be protest from fans if this article gets axed. Glad I'm not making the final call
— User:Tomwsulcer, 00:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)