Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out Now Consulting (2nd Nomination)
I don't agree that the discussion has been sidetracked. The Dutch textbook citing them mentioned by others does render notable per |notability as well as the Australian TV report about what they do meeting that and being |verifiable. I think the Google remarks started above because of me because I mistook what http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Out+Now+Consulting%22&hl=en&safe=off&start=180&sa=N "Ghits" meant in an early remark, but it also was one of the reasons cited by the nominee of the afd that started the discussion. When you get past the first few google pages there seem to be numerous citations referencing the company as being notable in their area of work. I also edited out material in the article I think may have been viewed as less than encyclopaedic
— User:JeffStryker, 20:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)