Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudden Jihad Syndrome
Sensible commentators haven't touched it, but there are 60,000+ hits from the likes of Little Green Footballs and other sloughs of irrationality.  Generally, a blog doesn't meet the standards of  as a source for a fact -- but a fact about blogs, such as that many blogs use a term, can be considered when we try to adjudicate notabiliity.  In addition, there are at least a couple uses that are neither Pipes himself nor right-wing blogs, e.g. http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=256521423294106 Investor's Business Daily.  My bottom line is that the term is out there enough that someone might see it, be unsure whether it's a real "Syndrome" or just some Islamophobe's rhetorical device, and come to Wikipedia seeking enlightenment.  This article presents uses by Pipes and others and now includes a criticism that I added.  It will therefore enlighten that hypothetical reader more than would a redirect to Daniel Pipes; the latter article couldn't readily accommodate all this detail
— User:JamesMLane, 20:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)