Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Harnett
Neighbourhood advisory commission (a/k/a neighborhood council) is not a level of office that gets an automatic free pass over  #2, but this article is not referenced anywhere close to well enough to get him over the bar: of the 28 footnotes here, nine of them are |primary sources that are not support for notability at all (i.e. Twitter tweets and/or the self-published websites of organizations he's directly affiliated with), another 11 are high school or college ''student'' newspapers which are not notability-assisting coverage, and the few that are real general-market media are still exclusively local coverage which doesn't demonstrate a credible reason why his notability could be deemed to have nationalized at all. As always, GNG is not just "anybody who's gotten their name into any media outlet twice or more" — GNG does not just test for the ''number'' of footnotes, but also applies tests for depth and range and context, and the sourcing here isn't passing those tests
— User:Bearcat, 23:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Notability)