Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Alan Miller
WP:FRINGE|Fringe researchers such as he appears to be need high-quality mainstream sourcing in order to provide an adequately |neutral overview of their contributions, and no good sources are visible here such as (if they existed) would let him pass . I'm not convinced that he should even be evaluated by  (the article portrays him as an academic but gives no evidence that he actually is one) but appears to fall far short of that bar too. Finally, more as a comment: I'm a little surprised that this was relisted. Three delete opinions (over that of the nominator) with some discussion but no dissent seems pretty clear to me
— User:David, 06:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:GNG||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)