Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (2nd nomination)
to celibacy. The article lacks secondary sources in the sense of  (independent reviews of such "incel" studies etc.) Although there are numerous mentions of "involuntary celibacy" in GB, they don't necessarily agree with this definition, being rather casual juxtapositions. There are in fact few sources to cover "incel" in depth: roughly two (groups): the Donnelly papers and the chapter by Abbott. There's no agreement in the numerous sources that cover celibacy in general as to whether celibacy (without other qualifiers) is strictly voluntary; from my survey of a half-dozen sources or so, this appears to be a minority position, although my source sample is too small for a definitive conclusion. The bottom line is that I see no good reason why a separate article for "incel" is needed at the moment
— User:Someone, 06:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:MEDRS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)