Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul series mystical weapons
they're notable fictional swords. The nominator doesn't appear to understand the policy on |no original research or |verifiability. Summarizing a source (a game in this instance) is not original research. And before someone says  requires information to be third-party verifiable, no, it just has to be verifiable by appearing in reliable sources. And PLOT is disputed. So there is no policy basis for deleting this article. And there are tons of third-party sources that have written about the games these swords appear in.  links to a WikiProject guideline which was invented by members of a WikiProject, not the Wikipedia community at large. The article isn't a game guide because it does not tell readers how to beat the fighting games in the Soul (series)|''Soul'' series. The article could at least be '''merged''' into Soul (series) per the |editing policy. And the term "gamecruft" is about as valid a reason for deletion as "thoughtcrime
— User:Pixelface, 10:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:V||WP:GAMECRUFT||WP:EP (Wikipedia:No original research)