Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autocunnilingus (2 nomination)
Reviewing the VfD and AfD, all I see is a bunch of keep votes based on ... google hits. No sources. No PROOF that this can actually be done. Loads of hoax pictures. In the VfD the main reason repeated for keep was that this was a 'real, growing article'. It's a stub with a CARTOON drawing of a fantasy act that men want to believe in. Without FIRM proof, this fails  and . Voting 'clean up' or 'expand' is pointless, since nothing -- '''nothing''' -- has been done to do either since the VfD or 1st AfD. If this was about something from Scientology , or about Creationism, or something controversial that people hated the idea of, none of you would be voting keep based on the merits of the article
— User:Elaragirl, 14:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)