Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resonance (MIT)
no reason to delete.  I'm going to suggest, per Isopropyl, that  should be ''ignored'' here.  The article is well written with a neutral and encyclopedic tone — unlike most band articles that hit AfD, this isn't a blatant attempt at self-promotion, nor is it particularly |crufty.  Not everything that ''may'' be deleted according to policy ''must'' be deleted.  In my opinion, losing this article would be a net loss for the encyclopedia
— User:Ilmari, 20:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MUSIC||WP:CRUFT (Wikipedia:Notability)