Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Kong defence
as the article is still only hours old and has gone through marked improvement since it was so quickly nommed. While tossing new articles into AfD before letting them be improved in order to see if they "can" be improved inside that 5-day period of discussion (Wiki has no ) is not what AfD is supposed to be about, it had exactly that result. No matter its name, the article is now worthy of wikipedia
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 19:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEADLINE (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)