Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack on HMS Invincible
I just wanted to make a comment about  and .  requires that sources are reliable and the mere fact that someone has published outrageous claims in a book doesn't mean we have to repeat them.  We are not required to include demonstrable nonsense about this attack when its plainly contradicted by the fact that the ship sailed home unharmed.   requires that the article should be written in an impartial tone that documents and explain major points of view, giving due weight for their prominence. An impartial tone doesn't mean we have to give equal weight to  or conspiracy theories, rather an impartial tone explains in context how this claim is contradicted by evidence.  A good example of how to deal with is in John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories.  I am concerned given the lecture I've just had about  and  that some may not understand that
— User:Wee, 13:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:VERIFIABILITY||WP:TRUTH||WP:VERIFIABILITY||WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE||WP:VERIFIABILITY||WP:TRUTH (Wikipedia:Verifiability)