Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yves Vatelot
and agree with Nom: There is too many issues that could only be solved by blowing the article up and starting all over again, if notability could be established. A big red flag, other than the essay writing, is the |advertising that violates What Wikipedia is not|policy. ''"The vineyard regained its place among the best Bordeaux wine producers"'' that is not sourced and is clear Wikipedia:Wikipuffery|''wikipuffery''. The Yves Vatelot#Early career|"Early career section" is not sourced and without that it screams |original research. Part of the Yves_Vatelot#In the consumer electronics industry|In the consumer electronics industry section is unsourced so more . The article red links a PMU partenaire |section heading, a PMU|disambiguation page, and again the same red link as the heading that is also unsourced. Although  "may not ''usually'' be a good argument for AFD" I observed all of the above without getting to the sources so would offer that an only solution is to Wikipedia:JUNK|"get rid of the WP:promotional|''promotional junk
— User:Otr500, 22:08, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT||WP:OR||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)