Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langham Estate
The article does specifically say it is about the company, so it must meet , as other editors have noted. I do find some coverage not included in the article:  'Langham Estate deal near', Mortished, Carl, ''The Times'' (London, England), Monday, August 9, 1993, Issue 64718, p.31;  'Langham offer lower as bidder disputes figures', Kinloch, Bruce, ''The Daily Telegraph'' (London, England), Tuesday, April 27, 1993, Issue 42873, p.25 (171 words);  'Langham Estate £59m tag looks excessive', ''The Daily Telegraph'' (London, England), Tuesday, March 9, 1993, Issue 42831, p.23 (769 words); 'Could the owner of Langham Estate test good relations with move for Shaftsbury?', ''The Telegraph,''  By Ben Marlow, 29 Nov 2014; 'The Langham Estate snaps up West End office for £29 million', ''The Evening Standard'', JOANNA BOURKE, Monday 20 April 2015. There are other articles which mention it, but the focus is often on the owner rather than the estate, or on neighbouring estates. These 5 articles, and ''The Independent'' article already in included as a source, all include the name Langham Estate in the headline, indicating that they regard it as notable, and they are all about it. They don't come under 'Examples of trivial coverage, eg standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as: "expansions, acquisitions, mergers, sale, or closure of the business" - or at least, many are about sales, but not routine, eg they're reporting on the progress of and problems with a proposed purchase. So I would say we probably have 6 sources which meet all the criteria of , significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and certainly enough to meet the 'multiple' criterion. Interestingly, I don't find much coverage before 1993, but that doesn't matter for establishing notability
— User:RebeccaGreen, 17:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:ORGCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)