Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gasthaus Gutenberger
This claims ''nothing'' that would make it a topic of any substantive or permanent ''encyclopedic'' interest, and cites no non-local coverage to pass the  test (which, as noted above, is ''not'' passed just because a local publication happens to have some extralocal readership.) We could nearly ''always'' write an article like this about almost ''any'' restaurant that has ''ever'' existed in the world at all, if local coverage verifying inconsequential facts of ''no'' wider or enduring ''significance'' were all it took. A standalone non-chain local restaurant has to be significantly ''more'' notable than the norm in some genuinely substantive way to qualify for a Wikipedia article, because there are ''millions'' of such things in the world and they can't ''all'' be deemed notable just for existing. If this were Winnipeglocalpedia, I'd say keep. But it's not. If it were sourceable that there was anything ''distinctive'' or ''unique'' about it compared to other German-cuisine restaurants, I'd say keep. But there's no evidence of that being shown here at all. If it were sourceable as having something approaching ''national'' renown, I'd say keep. But nothing here demonstrates or sources that
— User:Bearcat, 00:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUD (Wikipedia:Notability)