Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Wexler
Even if against policies and guidelines and because |other stuff does exist. Wait! don't tell me I can't argue this. It is suppose to be avoided at AFD's but is brought up so many times it can't be counted. This means that when policies and guidelines are ignored by enough people we should leave it alone or get it brought to a conclusion. We ''should not have fictional biographical articles'' unless presented as such like Kim Wexler (fictional character) but we do, then splash a real world actor or actress images on the "fake biography" to mix real world and in-universe elements. Every single one of these articles should have a biograpy template added to the page but I don't know if any do. Examples are too many to list but include Mike Ehrmantraut, J. R. Ewing and '''many, many more'''. This also means that by proxy we have allowed fake biographies to exist either by , Wikipedia:Silence and consensus, or the unlisted ecasue we like it. It does not matter as consensus has determined that fake biographies with real world names are acceptable. If this has been allowed by more local (project) consensus then it is either accepted by silence or just hasn't received attention. None of this matters as this is being allowed so we should just get over it. A head count will often suffice for consensus even if there are clear policy violations so that is another policy that is ignored. Anyway, I like it but think if the community wants it (fictional character) should be added or at a point consensus will change against real world people added to fake biographies. Just a thought
— User:Otr500, 07:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHER||WP:IAR||WP:B (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)