Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of the Holy Archangels, Bălți
There is no Wikipedia:Notability (churches) (proposed guideline did not pass. Neither did Wikipedia:Notability (architecture) nor Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks). What's left is : "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." and given I do not see any entry for churches at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, that's all we have to go on outside of broader . And in light of that, I would agree with Biruitorul. The sources here are very weak, inclusion on some list of churches/buildings, and passing mentions in very local, very niche sources that don't seem particularly reliable. It's one thing if a church is a historical building (monument). But outside that, unless there's some proper coverage per N, this fails at being encyclopedic. Ping me if there are any new arguments for me to consider
— User:Piotrus, 08:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GEOFEAT||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)