Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trimble Community Forest
WP:GNG is one section within  (click on GNG and then scroll up to verify). N/GNG is a guideline which is followed unless there is a very good reason to depart from it. The actual policy is really  which states: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." I wouldn't be suprised if |RSs, especially guidebooks, etc., cover this preserve in the coming years. So, I wouldn't oppose |userfying the article. When sources come to light, they can be added and the article recreated. V has more on the need for secondary sources (maps are generally primary sources) and the prohibition on original research, too. And I think  cuts the other way. There are thousands of articles on places, but not on places not receiving coverage. Just as there are thousands of articles on people, but that doesn't mean there should be an article on every person
— User:Novaseminary, 02:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:USERFY||WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Notability)