Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilkamal Plastics (2nd nomination)
Bah. I won't blame DGG, because none of the Indian editors showed up the last time this was discussed. Otherwise this would have been an  keep if multiple Indian editors in standing had asserted to its notability. Probably none of the Indian editors watch Indian TV or use plastic products, so I will assume  about their lack of participation as well. My harping without any backup probably gave off the illusion that this was indeed not notable, and I was some kind of POV editor/sockpuppet. The last time this was discussed, there were three Indian editors involved. Me, the nominator and the creator.  is skewed against Indian companies, so a lot of articles about Indian companies would probably end up being deleted if taken to AfD. However I find it hard to understand why an Indian editor would nominate a popular company like Nilkamal, even though I will still assume AGF again, and assume probably he is one of the editors who falls in the above categories, or is a deletionist who would rather see all articles which don't satisfy  get deleted. However I still find it strange as to why Nilkamal's biggest competitor, Supreme Industries, which is http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/improving-margins-may-earn-nilkamal-re-rating/articleshow/54775660.cms much smaller than Nilkamal was never considered for deletion by anybody, even though Nilkamal's page has mentioned that Supreme was their biggest competitor for quite some time now. Please don't think I am insinuating at , but I feel that since the bigger company does not satisfy any of the norms, that should also hold for the much smaller company, and in the interest of ruling out any bias in nominations, Supreme should also be AfDed. Could {{ping|DGG}} or {{ping|Dlohcierekim}} look at Supreme Industries, and see if it satisfies  or  and decide on the merits of an AfD as I seem to be very bad at it. And as for Nilkamal, I have always associated plastics with Nilkamal (and Supreme). But if none of the other Indian editors feel so, then probably this should be deleted as well
— User:Jupitus, 17:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:AGF||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)