Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATutor
The best sources I could dig up through Google (and belive me, I dug) were http://www.lmsnews.com/modules/content/index.php?id=22 two http://needforcontent.com/atutor-review reviews (neither of which I'm convinced of the |reliability of) and one http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=10110/ur0612a/ overall survey of this kind of software. Any mentions I found of the Blackboard patent thing only mentioned ATutor in conjunction with of Sakai and Moodle, which doesn't strike me as much justification for an individual article for ATutor. Take this information as you will
— User:Nifboy, 06:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)