Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Round Table (re-nomination)
per #NEWS.  Per Guy, the only clearly independent source that has been shown is the TES article (last reference) that talks about the controversy, which is a fundamentally online forum kind of controversy.  Still, it got reported in a reliable source, but just once, and there's no evidence to suggest that the issue has any deeper coverage.  I don't think the user behavior issue should have any impact on whether to delete the article or not, as long as we don't mistake the large numbers of participants for evidence that the subject has lasting notability.  (However, if the article is kept, I think we should place it on Wikipedia:Article probation|Article probation
— User:Mangojuice, 16:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)