Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Hawkins (2nd nomination)
He does not have an actual knighthood, as formerip pointed out in the DRV, according to http://www.maineworldnewsservice.com/caltrap/prioryof.htm, any news report that claims he did has done little investigative work. His claimed awards: Huxley, Orthomolecular are fringe pseudoscience awards. The Psychiatry awards are standard achievements for any psychiatrist with a long career; see their requirements. The sourcing is rather lacking, this is the only reliable source we have for the article: http://www.skepdic.com/news/newsletter58.html. Those pointed out by Uzma are unreliable (they repeat the false knighthood claim), one is a different person, one is a blog, one is a standard notification. These aren't good sources. He does not meet  either. His books are barely cited (: "One important barometer for determining the notability and level of acceptance of fringe ideas related to science, history or other academic pursuits is the presence or absence of peer reviewed research on the subject. "); what impact has he had as an author? Basically David Hawkins is as notable as any other Psychiatrist of similar experience; not notable enough. The only difference is that he has written books on pseudoscience; from  we look for the reliable mainstream sources: #Reliable sources not fringe sourcing
— User:IRWolfie, 10:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:FRINGE||WP:FRINGE||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Notability)