Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative theories regarding Hurricane Katrina
but I think it needs a major rewrite. Much of the article seems to give |undue weight to |fringe theories, but I do see some sources like The Guardian, Nature (journal)|Nature, Time (magazine)|TIME, CNN, and MSNBC. I think there should be an attempt to salvage the article based on any sources deemed |reliable. We have other articles on alternative theories http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=alternative+theories&fulltext=Search. This article could be seen as a |POV fork, although it may also just be a |spinoff of the Hurricane Katrina article. Moving certain theories to this page instead of the Hurricane Katrina article might not be a good effort to represent a |neutral point of view, although having this article could be seen as an attempt to represent views fairly. It seems like the Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations article exists to debunk various theories. We have the articles Titanic alternative theories and 9/11 conspiracy theories. I think the rumors about the levees in New Orleans may be notable, as they were widely reported in the mainstream media in the U.S. It looks to me like some of these theories are significant and have been published in reliable sources. The title of the page "Alternative theories regarding Hurricane Katrina" could be seen as biased, but at least the word "conspiracy" isn't in the title
— User:Pixelface, 13:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEIGHT||WP:FRINGE||WP:RS||WP:POVFORK||WP:SPINOUT||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)