Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seph Lawless (2nd nomination)
It is odd that there are no sources showing art critics or historians discussing him within the long tradition of the painting and photography of ruins.   It is also odd with his photo appearing everywhere that he is not notable enough for his real name to have been reliably published. Or his hometown, high school and education.    This lack shows that he's not all that notable.  More to the point, I cleaned up some of the text because since his name is also unknown the Cleveland childhood and auto factory worker father must be regarded as unsubstantiated assertions by Lawless and , if used, framed by text along the lines of "according to Lawless" until this sort of biographical info is published by independent, reliable sources.   Details about his personal life need to be stated "according to Lawless" until this sort of info can be reliably sourced.  Nevertheless, We can '''Keep''' the article not because, as I mentioned above, I had seen his work in a magazine and liked it, but because there is 
— User:E, 11:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)