Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mic Crenshaw
I would say it meets , as it meets criterion 1 due to at least 2 'independent', 'not self-published' and I would consider 'reliable'. I would say that it meets 'reliable' as the newspapers have wikipedia articles about them and it does not mention they are un-reliable. I would say that they however are not subject to the first exception, even though both of citations I chose were 'Q and A' newspaper articles, as I could see no evidence of endorsement or advertising in them. I would also say that the other citations might meet the requirements for the first criterion
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MUSICBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)