Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston Long
I've read the article, looked at refs, and the discussion above. My conclusion is that he doesn't qualify for inclusion under  or . (His latest book, in which he supposedly makes those groundbreaking confessions, is held in just two libraries https://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=wikipedia&q=isbn%3A9780972709491. His 2002 book in just six https://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=wikipedia&q=isbn%3A9780972281607. His PRESTON method book in just one https://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=wikipedia&q=isbn%3A9781424106844.) Coverage in "high-profile skeptic blog posts" doesn't seem to qualify per  and more importantly self-published blogs can't be used as sources per . Also, if the WorldCat data is correct, Stephen Barrett is a co-author to Long's latest book, so Barrett's coverage of Long is therefore not so independent
— User:Someone, 10:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:BLPSPS (Wikipedia:Notability)