Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Dyment (2nd nomination)
as per the discussion in the previous AFD from earlier this month. I looked at the sources provided by 96.127.244.201, and I find they are sizeable in-depth reviews (e.g. Canadian Art). The Globe and Mail references are not just a glancing namechecks. The Art on Paper reference is not really visible, but it appears to be starting at least a paragraph discussing Dyment. The Queens Journal article discusses his work in detail. So does the Toronto Star review. The coverage appears sufficient to satisfy  and therefore, as in the last AFD, the obvious conclusion is: keep
— User:Ross, 19:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)