Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Devine
If you look past the nominator's commentary about why he/she doesn't think the article belongs, you will see the nominator also cites policies and indicates that research looking for reliable sources was done.  This is more than many nominations on AfD have, and a detailed discussion of why the article lacks merit is certainly better than the many "delete per nom" or "keep per above" votes, and even the nominations that say "useless, delete" or "NN, Delete".  The fact is the nominator cites policies in their nomination, and indicates that they attempted to establish notability.  They should not be Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|bitten when they are citing WP policies in their nomination.  That said, the article fails the |general notability guidelines, and also fails 
— User:Theseeker4, 14:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:PORNO (Wikipedia:Notability)