Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diggers Bar, Hamilton
reference 1, which demonstrates that the topic has received media coverage, clearly states the extended quote.  on Stuartyeates here, but I don't think they could've read the whole article to not see it. Quantum Foundation has also received media coverage even if not particularly well-known outside of their locale. Furthermore, the nominator only adds to the weighting on the topic, by showing an article, (EVEN MORE media coverage here) about the building being listed a historical places trust (and even though , other such buildings have their own articles for a reason, '''historic places trust buildings in New Zealand of category I or II are notable historic buildings.''', such a status is not just given out to every building simply for being old, but because it has historical significance on at least a national level. The nominator's argument further condradicts itself by admitting the area as a well-known bar and venue for notable touring musicians. And of course, any arguments for deleting the article on the basis of being a paranormal topic are invalid under 'TLIKEIT. There wouldn't be a Wikiproject Paranormal if such articles were not welcome on Wikipedia. This should never have been brough to AfD, much less been prodded
— User:Laughing, 21:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:IDON (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)