Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of units in the Age of Mythology series
If the article had information on how or why these units were selected, and how their in-game representations were designed as such, my opinion could have been different; unfortunately, whatever reliably sourced information there is, it is about the game itself or a one sentence quotes on what a unit is capable of and how to use them in the game.  The current list does not display intent to be discriminate, simply listing all the units without care for their purpose.  Per , lists are to be for information, navigation, or development purposes.  On information, the units as a whole are not of interest to the general reader.  On navigation, the current list do not match that purpose, simply linking whenever there is a unit. On development, the terms used in the list are not of interest to readers, many of which only exist in the game and would fail notability as their own articles.  Hence, the list is an |indiscriminate collection of information. Furthermore, the article is acting like a game-guide (, ) by teaching readers that "''the Nereid is the most powerful sea myth unit when fighting OTHER myth units. The Nereid has a whopping 7x bonus vs myth units, meaning it does 700% more damage to myth units after armor is taken into effect. 25 * 7 = 175 {{'}}The Nereid is a fairly run-of-the-mill sea myth unit. It{{'}}s fairly strong against most mortal ships, but weak against ram ships.{{'}}''"  Perhaps out of point, but I think that a "List of mythological creatures in the Age of Mythology series" minus game-guide materials would be a better list than this (a discriminate focus, and helpful directory
— User:Jappalang, 06:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LIST||WP:IINFO||WP:VGSCOPE||WP:NOTGUIDE (Wikipedia:Lists)