Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gambo (carcass)
Eberhart looks reliable in this case. There is significant coverage in at least one reliable independent source, but it's not a secondary source, it's a catalogue of about a thousand of these beasties. Considering  and  is there enough for an article. This isn't addressed above.&mdash
— User:EricR, 23:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTPAPER||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)