Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Tuyl
Rory, the problem is not that this is ''commercial'', but rather that this is |self-published and thus fails our standards of |reliable sourcing from |impartial third parties. |An edit, article or editor need not be for-profit to be |promotional
— User:Orangemike, 19:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:SPS||:WP:RS||:WP:NPOV||:WP:NOBLECAUSE||:WP:PROMOTION (Wikipedia:Verifiability)