Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWSA
Broadcast stations have traditionally been been presumed notable on Wikipedia if they have at least the main type of broadcast license (i.e. not low-power or temporary) for their country and originate their own local programming rather than simply being a rebroadcaster.  Backing up that presumption is easy for U.S./Canadian stations; but I've found that, often, Philippine stations don't even have enough data to establish that they have had original histories/programming separate from another station, let alone  and Wikipedia:Notability (broadcasting).  Maybe the status of the stations are given more coverage in the Philippine print media; but online, you often find sparse and contradictory information about whether stations even exist.  I had a heck of a time sorting out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXDM, for example.  Since Philippine stations tend to group in networks pretty often, I'd say that, like with my opinion on DXDM (which turned out to be a no-consensus close), Philippine stations should be deleted/redirected unless there is at least  evidence that they originate(d) their own programming or had a separate history.  There seems to be some (unsourced) claim of separate programming for DZBF and separate history on DWKI#History, but they seem to be 
— User:Closeapple, 07:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)