Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogar (2nd nomination)
Arguing to keep an article, that has zero references, and tagged since  2014, with ''"notable or not"'' because it has some unclear association between a surname and the name of a community, is insane. Wikipedia is not a #DICTIONARY|dictionary, GENEALOGY|genealogy portal, #OR|publisher of original thought (such as "defining terms"), or |indiscriminate collection of information. The article fails ABILITY, even , as well as . These are reasons we don't "keep" articles regardless of some remote connection to something else
— User:Otr500, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOTGENEALOGY||WP:NOT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:GNG||WP:VERIFIABILITY (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)