Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gas porosity
This article has problem with NPOV and therefore needs to be rewrite, but I disagree with deletion. If the information in the article is a copy of published information (and the patent is published), it can't be . Also, gas porosity is quite notable thing in petrophysics, and worth to have its own article. This article is about gas porosity and not about the Patent 5684299 solely. The user presented this article for deletion uses logic that if the source is not notable, that also means that the article can't be notable. I think this is wrong and dangerous logic to use. About copyvio
— User:DGG, 20:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)