Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Baukol
Certainly in ''theory'' we don't observe a notability distinction between temporary "interim" or "acting" holders of a political office and permanent duly elected or appointed ones — ''if'' we can source them ''properly'', then we don't care if they held the role for twenty years or three weeks. But all we have for sourcing ''here'' is one set of |primary source meeting minutes and two glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, and that's just not good enough. For the record, I have ''also'' occasionally nominated my own prior work for deletion, usually because it was stuff which I created a decade ago under our old sourcing and notability rules, but which ''couldn't'' really be repaired to meet the ''current'' standards anymore
— User:Bearcat, 19:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)