Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Roddenberry
I appreciate the nominator's point, but I think that there has been enough coverage of the younger Roddenberry through the years--especially in connection with his ''Trek Nation'' documentary--to satisfy .  See e.g. http://www.thehindu.com/arts/radio-and-tv/article3632108.ecehttp://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-05-21-trek-tribute-film_x.htmhttp://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/story/2011-11-28/roddenberry-star-trek-documentary/51448162/1 and these GNews results https://www.google.com/search?q=%22rod%22+roddenberry+%22trek+nation%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=6w1&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&ei=K3oNUOqXGcjs2gW6lfAo&start=0&sa=N&biw=1680&bih=894https://www.google.com/search?q=%22roddenberry+jr%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbas=0&prmdo=1&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=-HwNUPD4Oomw2QWT9MAW&ved=0CCcQpwUoBQ&biw=1680&bih=894 On balance I think deleting the article leaves an unnecessary hole in our ''Star Trek'' coverage.  On the other hand, the current version of the article is overly promotional, and that should be remedied
— User:Arxiloxos, 16:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)