Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cellebrum Technologies Limited (2nd nomination)
Specifc reasons were given in the nomination: "; insufficient coverage in secondary sources; self-published elements and only trivial or incidental coverage. ". For further details, see . The authors of the article are irrelevent, it should be assessed on its own merits. Parameters of notability are fully documented in . We do not compare articles - please see . (Out of interest, of the other companies you mentioned in the talk page, Hungama has now been deleted (as 'blatant spam') and OnMobile is undergoing serious revision and debate
— User:Chzz, 10:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:N||WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Notability)