Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garadaghly Massacre (2nd nomination)
per my own and other arguments advanced in previous AfD regarding the strength of the existing sourcing. I disagree with the assertion that an Azerbaijani source is by nature |primary. Unless we are to assume that all of the sources were literally written by people who were in the village at the time of the assault, by calling all of these sources "primary" we are removing the ability of Azerbaijani media to contribute to the coverage of Azerbaijani events within Wikipedia. As I suggested last time, if there are opposing views on this subject then they should be incorporated within the article. If the concern is objectivity, deleting the article is another and more extreme version of being non-objective
— User:Ginsengbomb, 19:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:No original research)