Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemo Gould (2nd nomination)
Commenting about every single source and analyzing them is not bludgeoning them, because it shows the exact concerns here. Considering , simply noting that an article was kept ''over 7 years ago'' not relevant today if the notability and methods of it has substantially changed, that would essentially be saying "Why are looking at it again if ''they'' kept it 7 years ago
— User:SwisterTwister, 18:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CCC (Wikipedia:Consensus)