Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of women art historians
as the original Article For Deletion nominator, I am finding that the superior efforts by some editors to find references that I missed have brought the topic to a point where we have, if not yet 100% solidly crossed a rubicon of notability, reached the point where it seems quite likely that line will be crossed with a bit more development. To avoid the  concerns, I feel we should limit it not just to blue links, but to blue links+names with references that suggest a high likelihood of being able to meet notability requirements should an article be created. (As example, a reference to a listing in the Dictionary of Art Historians would qualify; a basic listing on a faculty list would not), and where that reference includes mention of the individuals gender (not because we should list only those for whom the gender is a significant attribute, but for the mundane reason that, well, we've already had to take one man off of the list; names that sound feminine to a modern American may be masculine in other places and times.)For those of you new to the Articles For Deletion process, let me note that my change in stance does ''not'' stop the process; other editors have waded in with their own arguments for deletion
— User:NatGertler, 19:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DIRECTORY (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)