Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parliament Street (think tank)
According to , quotations from the think tank's personnel as story sources are regarded as trivial coverage, and that accounts for most of the sources in the article and what I found on Google and Google News. It does seem to be good at making Freedom of information in the United Kingdom|FOI requests and getting coverage that way. But aside from the clergy assaults these were fairly trivial topics, like the police losing smartphones or Tweets by public servants. The EU Transparency Report link was good. It needs more sources like that. –&nbsp
— User:Margin1522, 20:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)