Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferguson October
The article is about an organized social movement, not a group, thus the applicable notability guideline is . Several major media sources have reported specifically about the movement in non-trival coverage including http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/11/ferguson-october-protests_n_5970056.html Huffington Post, http://abcnews.go.com/US/thousands-march-st-louis-protesting-police-killings/story?id=26128360 ABC News, http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/10/11/powerful-images-as-massive-ferguson-protests-kick-off-peacefully/ Washington Post, http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-ferguson-protests-20141011-story.html LA Times, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/10/11/protests-peaceful-as-questions-about-deaths-loom/17114913/ USA Today, http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ferguson-weekend-resistance-thousands-expected MSNBC, http://www.essence.com/2014/10/12/ferguson-october-marches-expand-second-day Essence Magazine, http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/ferguson-october The New Yorker, http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/05/sophisticated-network-social-media-drive-ferguson-protests/ Fox News, http://www.ibtimes.com/ferguson-october-protests-over-50-people-arrested-following-acts-civil-disobedience-1704366 International Business Times, and http://www.newsweek.com/peaceful-ferguson-october-march-recalls-missouri-protests-276921 Newsweek. I'm gobsmacked that this article was nominated for AfD as it shows a startling disregard for . Editors commenting that the article should be renamed to ''2014 Civil Rights Protests in the United States'' should understand that these are related, but completely different subjects, much in the way that Kent State shootings is different than Protests against the Vietnam War. ''This'' subject easily stands on it's own as meriting an independent article, per 
— [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]], 02:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)