Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steam into History (2nd nomination)
If you "accept the assertion that this page was created to promote a tourist railroad", then you see why I nominated the page, so I don't particularly appreciate the ''ad hominem'' as to how you can't understand my actions.  The news articles you cite as GHits are ''all local'', and by the way, you can do that search from the top of the AfD - you're not breaking new ground or creating an aha! moment that you insinuate I forgot.  As for ongoing "stories" (plural), I see one local story on one locomotive, not multiple sources talking about this acquisition - don't misrepresent the extent of coverage.  As for "news farther afield" GNG still requires substantial coverage, and a few lines in a larger travel article on the area is not substantial coverage.  That's the crux of the notability problem - local coverage is still local coverage, and  isn't valid - there's quite a few redlinks on that heritage railroad list, too, because 
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:ENN (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)