Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HEWI London
Not only is the article completely promotional, *none* of the references are intellectually independent and they fail . Both {{u|Cwmhiraeth}} and {{u|Szzuk}} state that the references are sufficient for notability. This is not true - at least for the ones included in the article and mentioned here. Perhaps could either of them please post which references meet the criteria for establishing notability here? While the references are published by third party reliable sources, the references/article themselves are not intellectually independent or contain no in-depth information - qualities which are required in order for references to meet the criteria for establishing notability. Cwmhiraeth mentions references from The Telegraph, Harpers Bazaar, Daily Mail and El Pais. But The Telegraph article relies on quotations and interview with the founder with no independent analysis or opinon and no independent in-depth reporting on the company, therefore fails  and . The Harpers Bazaar reference is a listing of "The Best Designer Resale Sites" with a small description of each site - specifically fails  as it fails "inclusion in lists of similar organizations". There's two Daily Mail references. The first is "My lightbulb moment" from the founder -> fails for the same reasons as the Telegraph article. The second reference is not intellectually independent as the author relies on information provided by the company as demonstrated with comments such as (and its a bit of a giveaway) "and Gucci, whose owner is super famous, but sadly I’m not allowed to reveal her identity." Both Daily Mail references fail 
— User:HighKing, 18:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)