Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bromance (2nd nomination)
The article barely contains anything except etymology and example usage, i.e. discussion about the ''word'', which should be in wikt:bromance, per . The rest, if not already covered by the current article on homosociality should be merged into that article. Original research trying to establish that ''bromance'' is a new phenomenon, not covered by pre-existing terminology, should be removed
— User:PeR, 13:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIC (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)