Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elecom
1. I don't think it is an acceptable argument against notability to argue that someone has provided too many sources. 2.  says "Acceptable sources under this criterion include all types of reliable sources except works carrying merely trivial coverage," and goes on to provide a number of examples of trivial coverage. HighKing seems to go well beyond this when they reject the Nikkei Shimbun. HighKing has themselves said that the BCN award mentioned in Kabutan would establish notability. The full listings of those awards are here (https://www.bcnaward.jp/award/gallery/2017/hard/index.html , https://www.bcnaward.jp/award/gallery/2017/hard/p2.html ) and they appear to be based on the point of sale data for the market share of various products. Many of these are trivial, but some of them are not - for instance (second link), Elecom has the highest market share of sales of computer mice - higher than Logitech
— User:Furius, 23:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)