Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maniram Rajora
without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody with access to archival referencing tools can do much better than this. A population of 100K is still not an instant notability freebie that overrides a dearth of actual sources — even in the US, a mayor who was this poorly sourced ''would'' still be ''deleted'' if nobody could actually ''show'' any new sources that could be added to fulfill the  criterion. Even for pre-internet people who don't Google well, the notability test still does not just ''presume'' that ''maybe'' better sources exist: we are allowed to cite offline print sources, but the existence of offline sourcing still has to be ''shown'' and not just ''speculated'' about. Of the three footnotes here, however, one is a Facebook post, one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about something else entirely, and the only one that's about him to any non-trivial degree is a mere blurb, and that's not enough. If people could ''show'' better sources, then I'd be happy to reconsider this — but that's a matter of showing them, not just guessing at the possibility
— User:Bearcat, 14:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Notability)