Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional pandas
per  and .  Only one element of this list has a reference.  It seems odd to me that this article has existed for so long, and had such extensive work to it done by numerous editors, yet no one has been able to find sources.  If you got rid of all the red-linked and non-linked elements in this list, you'd be left with a pretty sad looking article.  Why is that important?  Because red-linked and non-linked elements mean that they're likely not notable.  So, can we jump to the conclusion that this list is a collection of mostly non-notable things?  I think it would be safe to say yes
— User:Snottywong, 01:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IINFO||WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)