Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Walpin (2nd nomination)
per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Walpin firing and BLP1E.  The post in question is not a notable post meriting an automatic  qualification.  It's a minor federal agency; the current CEO of the agency doesn't even have a bio article, and neither do several of his predecessors.  Walpin's successor and predecessor do not have articles.  If the article is kept, the current version is a violent violation of  and  by failing to fairly detail the lawsuit; Walpin's side of the story; or Senator Grassley's investigation.  Amazingly, the words "Kevin Johnson" never appear in the article.  The Kevin Johnson article is similarly lacking.  I note that bringing this article up to par on the subject of his firing would then cause the article to violate UNDUE, further demonstrating how this article is a BLP1E.  In fairness, I note that if someone were willing to spend the money dredging up old New York newspaper articles from the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, it would be possible to construct an article that meets the weak standards of .  (For example, Walpin's 1999 op-ed criticizing the American Bar Association received national publicity.)  I would change my !vote if someone promised to do that, but I see no indication that anyone ever will
— User:THF, 22:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NPOV||WP:BLP||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)