Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Gravity theory
Just because it may be wildly incorrect doesn't mean that it's an automatic delete, but that  applies. RG appears to have originated with João_Magueijo and Lee Smolin -- their http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/21/7/001/meta 2004 article has been cited by 164 articles. Magueijo was still working on it as of 2013 in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257459742_Intermediate_inflation_from_rainbow_gravity this paper with John D. Barrow. Per http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rainbow-gravity-universe-beginning/ this article, Smolin has moved in favour of Relative locality. Even (contrafactually) if every paper on the topic happened to have been written by random http://snarxiv.org/ SnarXiv generation, the fact that it got the https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Rainbow+gravity%22&tbm=nws ''quantity'' of tabloid/popsci buzz it did is somewhat notable, regardless of the ''quality'' -- or lack of it -- of that buzz. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Hydronium, 09:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)