Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of metonyms
Sorry, Louiedog, but a list of metonyms is potentially endless. The list actually begins by stating that it's a list of ''common'' metonyms &ndash; so why doesn't the article title make that distinction? Even if it did, I would still support deletion at this point, because the entire article appears to be unreferenced |original research. If you can find references indicating that the metonyms on this list are, in fact, more common than others, I may reconsider
— User:A, 15:51, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)