Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junie Hoang
I'm persuaded that / apply here, and there should not be an article on Hoang herself.  Apart from the notable lawsuit, she's a third-tier actor, and would not merit an article but for the lawsuit.  The guidance in the  policy and  guideline anticipate that there is already a separate article on the event into which the content should be merged, but that's not the case here.  A few editors have suggested creating an article and redirecting; or deleting without prejudice to recreating.  Some have suggested just deleting based on the policy or guideline without considering the notability of the event.  Because an article on the event will consist of substantially the same material as the "Junie_Hoang#Lawsuit_against_IMDb|Lawsuit against IMDb" section, we should not delete this article and re-create that material.  Apart from the inefficiencies of recreating deleted work, deletion and recreation will lose the history that needs to be maintained to comply with -BY-SA.  In light of that, the page should be moved to ''Hoang v. Amazon.com'' and edited to conform to the article being about the case rather than the actor (and to avoid  issues).  I've changed my position above accordingly
— User:TJRC, 19:10, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:CC||WP:PSEUDO (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)