Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Édmée Schneerson (2nd nomination)
Using Google as the sole (or even primary) standard is explicitly against |notability, and should be discounted. In the Lubavitch community she is very notable, and it is also obvious that in that community females are not splashed in the public's eye (e.g., traditional secondary/tertiary sources) due to their cultural sensitivity as publicity relates to women (i.e., there would be a cultural bias on the part of Wikipedia without adjusting the standards for that community, just as there would be for Native Americans, etc.). More prudent, IMHO, is to take seriously DGG's concern of the limited source, and because Wikipedia http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_is_not_paper is not paper, retain with the tag asking for additional documentation, with the understanding that additional documentation may be from atypical sources
— User:Edstat, 17:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)