Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Bourne
First, I do not think he qualifies under . He is known for his poetry and translations, not for his scholarly research. But he does seem to qualify under  as a creative professional/poet/translator, even if the case is not very strong (but previous AfDs regarding poets show that such situations are not unusual and that it is often not easy to demonstrate notability there). The page has been improved considerably in the last few days and looks mostly up to speed now. GoogleBooks, even after filtering, gives 111 hits for himhttp://books.google.com/books?tab=sp&sa=N&um=1&lr=&q=%22Daniel+Bourne%22+poetry&sa=N. GoogleScholar produces 29 hits after filteringhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?um=1&lr=&q=%22Daniel%20Bourne%22%20poetry&sa=N&tab=ps, some of which give explicit praise to his work and go into biographical details. For example,  this:http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/getdocument.aspx?logid=5&id=0A961CC8-8A02-4ABE-BBF2-1AE326625409, an 2001 article in "Sarmatian Review", goes at some length talking about him
— User:Nsk92, 13:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)