Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muffin top
per . To keep an article on a neologism there must be reliable sources ''about'' the term, not just that ''use'' the term. The notion of this being the "word of the year" sounds impressive, but it was actually the word of the year in an online poll. Not quite the same thing. The argument that this phrase "deserves" an article is flawed because no topic is entitled to a Wikipedia entry, and the flaw becomes fatal after considering that |the existence of other articles has no bearing on whether this one should exist
— User:Otto4711, 01:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)