Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Alexander (3rd nomination)
I was the declining administrator for speedy deletion; my reasoning was that (a) it was not an attack page, as everything was sourced appropriately and (b) I deemed that there were sufficient improvements from the previous version - there were only about 5 or 6 sources quoted then, there are now lots more, and these are from reasonable third party sources.  Having said that, the tone is completely wrong for Wikipedia, he is only notable for  so unless there is a complete rewrite to bring it in line with BLP, then the article should be deleted
— User:StephenBuxton, 11:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)