Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry R. Lawrence
I am in agreement that this level of LDS church leadership confers a very strong presumption of notability, analogous to how we treat Olympic athletes, state and provincial legislators, widely cited scientists and academics, Roman Catholic bishops, and secondary schools, none of which are expected to comply fully with the GNG. I agree with the lengthy and persuasive "keep" arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy D. Funk, which apply in this case as well. In addition, the |GNG, is ''not'' policy but rather a subsection of a broad guideline. Hence the name, "General notability ''guideline''". Repeatedly calling it policy does not make it so, and subject specific notability guidelines are created because the GNG is ''not'' universally applicable
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)