Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Khan
Per  and . Apart from a bunch of tabloids and celebrity gossip, there doesn't appear to be enough coverage to assert that this person has met the guidelines for , and it looks pretty clear that this person does not meet . I ''did'' find some sources talking about her modeling ('''NSFW Warning: suggestive photos''' - http://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz/497151/Chloe-Mafia-boobs-bikini, http://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz/495754/Chloe-Mafia-Snog-Marry-Avoid-before-X-Factor, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3092571/X-Factor-reject-dubbed-Britain-s-biggest-chav-goes-rags-riches-making-MILLIONS-setting-webcam-stripping-business.html, and http://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz/493543/huge-boobs-chloe-mafia-worlds-smallest-dressing-gown), but she does not look to meet  (for those who consider her modeling to be pornography). I don't believe that  applies in this particular case, but I agree that notability is not sufficient given my research and findings
— User:Oshwah, 06:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:PORNBIO||WP:1E (Wikipedia:Notability)