Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Brockwell
The article as written is short on independent secondary sources and long on: interviews that are simply Brockwell talking about Brockwell without analysis by the interviewer, material ''by'' Brockwell, and tabloid content. However, {{U|SusunW}} has identified independent sources published by the ''BBC'', ''CNN'', ''News.com.au'', and ''Tech Times'', to which can be added an article in ''The Times'' (London)https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/woman-finally-wins-her-struggle-with-doctors-to-be-sterilised-at-30-3x3jlqp6d and one in a ''Washington Post'' |newsblog about another "campaign" of hers, against the app Stolen!https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/01/15/the-brief-life-and-sudden-death-of-stolen-the-app-for-trading-people/?utm_term=.86ff04ad0749 These are enough to meet . Keep and rewrite using the identified sources
— User:Worldbruce, 03:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEWSBLOG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)