Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resource-based economic model
Rephrasing what I said in the nom, since my concerns have not been addressed: why I call for deletion is '''because the article duplicates (the purpose of) existing articles on the same topic'''. Not just one article but three. We don't need a fourth. And articles should be titled according to what a majority of secondary sources call the subject (). It's not RBEM, it's RBE. And the reasons that I listed are the reasons why I don't just support merging the content into (the) other article(s). By me, the TVP article could/should be expanded, and a more modest/shorter version of the current RBEM content could be written for the section in the older RBE article. —&nbsp
— User:Jeraphine, 04:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TITLE (Wikipedia:Article titles)