Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Erhard vs. Columbia Broadcasting System
Cirt as usual, has created a Fine Article with a plethora of diverse sources establishing Notability and to Boot 60 minutes segements on it. Also Concerned about Open COI on the nom part (though I applaud his decency on being open about). If the Nominator has concerns about  then the solution is to make it NPOV. However Cirt has once again created a Neutral (From my POV at least.)  It is not an Attack page or Coatrack in my opinion. Also may i Note the stats you have cited are accuate but its worth noting that EST-Popculture, Outrageous Betrayal are both GA having gone through some form of Peer review and been promoted as Neutral and Factually accurate. YOu have also failed to provide any evidence Cirt violating Biographies of living persons and Neutral point of view specifically on Werner Erhard and topics related to Werner Erhard. Please bring up such accuastions on the appropriate notice board as mudslinging here is counter proudcitve.  Also you Cirts edits at Werner Heart seem to mostly be reverting vandalism and such http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Werner_Erhard&action=history
— User:ResidentAnthropologist, 18:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)