Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Saturday Comes Sunday (2nd nomination)
Looking at the first time this was nominated for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Saturday Comes Sunday in 2011, have to agree with this argument by {{ping|Raul654}} that resulted in a quick keep result: "The stated deletion reasons are flatly false. The term gets http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=1486&bih=765&q=%22after+saturday+comes+sunday%22&oq=%22after+saturday+comes+sunday%22&aq=f&aqi=g-v1&aql=1&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=539l2928l0l3075l29l16l0l0l0l0l197l2267l2.14l16l0 38,000 hits now 78,000+ on the internet and http://www.google.com/search?q=%22after+saturday+comes+sunday%22&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 74 hits on Google books now 108, hence it is notable. Every single statement in the article is referenced to a reliable source - there's nothing there that is original research. This whole nomination is basically drive-by AFD tagging because the nominatior |doesn't like the subject matter
— User:Raul654, 15:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)