Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F@NB0Y$
What ''EXACTLY'' in this article is unverifiable and needs sources?  If this comic is as notable as people say it is, then it should be easy to back this up with evidence.  This could simple be a case of the article being worded poorly and in a way that makes it seem less notable than it really is.  Rather than run around in circles with keep vs delete, we should consider cleaning it up and adding more 3rd party sources to it.  I'm seeing people throw  and  around, but I would like to know what exactly in the article is original research. --skyman8081
— NONE, 04:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)