Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Død Beverte (2nd nomination)
I was very disappointed to see that there was no consensus for deletion of Dethcentrik due to one editor not looking closely at the sources referenced. In particular there are a lot of sites which allow user submitted content and these can be used on wikipedia to stack a bunch of superficial references to add legitimacy to the topic. The same thing has certainly been done here. It is a clue when you see 15 references in the same place that someone is stacking in order to make up for the subject's general lack of notability. The article does not actually establish notability. I will note that it has been deleted before for this exact same reason. It is common for small-time uknown garage bands to create a wikipedia page for themselves in order to promote the band and give themselves a certain notoriety. This is just such an attempt at promotion, only with more meaningless references. Regardless of motives which cannot themselves constitute a viable reason for deletion, the article does not pass  or . Not notable. see Wikipedia:Masking the lack of notability, Wikipedia:Wikipuffery and especially Wikipedia:Bombardment
— User:Metal, 08:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BAND (Wikipedia:Notability)