Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10/90 gap
article might be poorly written and sourced but it took me 20 seconds to do this http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%2210+90+gap%22&btnG=Search&meta= Google search and find articles in the Journal of Perinatology, The Scientist and the World Health Organisation. There also seems to be a bit of http://www.medicalprogresstoday.com/spotlight/spotlight_indarchive.php?id=427 controversy about it. See the last item http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/10138 here where it is mentioned by Medicins sans Frontieres and the The Guardian Weekly. Please ensure you've covered the bases of  before nominating. The "forum" you mention is http://www.globalforumhealth.org/ not a non-notable bunch of amateurs in a chat room but an international organisation! As penance, please fix the article
— User:Bigger, 22:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)