Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Albertson
per  and . I do not consider that Albertson nor his movies and book meet inclusion criteria. Sure, someone cared enough to put in all the effort in creating the pages to ensure inclusion on wikipedia (thus answers.com, shortopedia.com), and spamming the internet. In most of these cases, the information has been copied verbatim from one site to the next. Except that the wiki entry seems the most complete, including details about how he earned money by being a hacker, suggesting it could only have been autobiographical, as no independent sources can be found . His websites toddalbertson.com,http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=link%3Awww.toddalbertson.com&btnG=Search 1, thegodsofbusiness.comhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=link%3Awww.thegodsofbusiness.com&btnG=Search 2, theproverbmovie.comhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=link%3Awww.theproverbmovie.com&btnG=Search 3, none of which are linked to anything, but score Ghits when searching for "Todd Albertson". I personally don't consider imdb entries necessarily as criteria for judging notability. Even if there's an entry at imdb, editors need to check qualitatively whether the global achievements of the subject meet wiki's criteria by looking for other corroborating sources. Wikipedia will only be unreliable if people continue to post nonsense, spam and entries of non-notable people or organisations and if facts are not correctly checked
— User:Ohconfucius, 03:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:SPAM||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)