Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Indonesia Forum
I'm not sure exactly what is meant by the "non organization" line in the WHOIS report, but it seems a bit outlandish to me to take it at face value and say it's evidence that the subject is "not an organization" or a fake organization. I can see it as an abbreviated form of "non-profit" organization or "non-governmental" organization. Regardless, the registration line in a WHOIS isn't nearly as authoritative as published, reliable sources. We need to read the WHOIS line in context with the sources, and we need to follow the lead of what the reliable sources say. The provided sources http://www.webcitation.org/6S5t2eOuN here and http://www.webcitation.org/6JIjZXXwv here in ''Republika (Indonesian newspaper)|Republika'' demonstrate that this isn't purely an invention by a Wikipedian. Beyond that, the relevant notability guideline is , which is satisfied by the presentation of multiple independent reliable sources in the article that provide in-depth coverage of the topic—see the two sources in ''Republika'', https://web.archive.org/web/20150731113705/http://jateng.metrotvnews.com/read/2015/07/29/151979/puluhan-ilmuwan-dari-berbagai-negara-hadiri-international-indonesia-forum ''MetroTV News'', http://news.okezone.com/read/2012/07/04/373/658559/ugm-yale-university-bahas-posisi-indonesia ''Okezone''. Note that link rot will happen naturally with any source found online – archived URLs do not make the source any less credible than when it was published, and they are certainly not indicative of some contrived hoax. Also note that |self-published sources may be used under certain conditions as sources of information ''about themselves'', as it is done here
— User:Mz7, 04:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:Notability)