Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Row (cryptozoology)
Agreed that the purpose is to document the hoax, but only if the hoax is notable. Loch Ness has appeared in a number of media, same as Yeti. I can not find anything on Row, and the article itself seems to suggest that the only book which documents it is the cited source. Per the |general notability guidelines a subject must have "Significant coverage". '''~ AmeIiorate
— User:AmeIiorate, 10:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)