Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Bull House of Art
Every single source is either unreliable, blacklisted (Examiner.com), a primary source (Metro Times being one example), or local to Detroit or San Diego, as far as I can see. Often a mixture of the three. And a Google search does not change that much. So, we're left with a list of non-notable people, of dubious reliability, about some kind of project run by a non-notable person in a local area that just happens to be sponsored by Red Bull. And Red Bull's sponsorship means nothing; they sponsor pretty much everything under the sun. So, yeah. Doesn't matter how many Google News searches come up, as per 
— User:Lukeno94, 08:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GHITS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)