Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intuitive eating
It seems to me that this is in fact a notable topic, and I do not find the nominator's expressed reasons for deletion to be other than a version of . Whether this is sound medical advice is irrelevant, as we don't give medical advice in any case. Whether this is in fact the sort of topic that falls under  I am not sure of. But even assuming that it is, that does not affect the notability of the topic. Moreover, I find it hard to believe that the current version is mode closely in compliance with MEDRS than the version with 66 cited sources including 5 review articles. {{U|Prof Haeffel}}, you should be aware that that version was '''not''' deleted, but only reverted. It remains in the edit history, and could be restored by any editor, although that should not be done against consensus (See 
— User:DESiegel, 19:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:MEDRS||WP:BRD (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)