Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahrokh Zamani
If the current article reads like a political statement, the answer is cleanup, not deletion.  The only question is notability.  The subject is the focus of numerous reliable bylined secondary sources, which is our typical criteria, but I could see a potential argument for , hence my "weak" keep !vote.  That said, the event attracted the attention of amnesty international, as well as other big name sources, which I think is sufficient to merit conclusion, so I do maintain keep
— User:Fieari, 01:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Notability)