Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estophobia
It's a neologism, if not an outright protologism.  First, Wikipedia is not Wiktionary.  Second, the discussion, such as it ''could be'' would focus on historical currents.  Since this is a brand new coinage with fewer citations that Slartybartfast, there isn't much that is possible there.  Instead, we can have, and do have, a nice bit of  going on.  Wikipedia is '''not''' a place to settle scores, for illuminating the world about the ultimate reality of "those people," or fixing the world.  It's an encyclopedia, and this article ''cannot'' be encyclopedic and must not be lexical
— User:Geogre, 03:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BATTLEFIELD (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)