Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabari Parker's high school career (2nd nomination)
ul|TonyTheTiger}} asked me to clarify an edit I made to this AfD (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ivanvector&diff=609568915&oldid=609034100). I hid the table of pageviews that he posted to this AfD as I felt it was completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand, but if he feels it's important to his argument then that's fine. It's still irrelevant, though. The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabari Parker's high school career|first AfD on this resulted in a thorough consensus that the content fork was unnecessary and improper, not because it was too long but because it existed at all. Several editors noted that there is an unencyclopedic level of trivial details included not just in the subject article but in the Jabari Parker|main article as well, and that a content fork for an athlete's high school career is  detail, regardless of coverage. At Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 May 6|deletion review, editors again noted that the fork presented an excruciating level of detail not necessary to cover for an athlete at this stage of their career, and the deletion was thoroughly endorsed. TonyTheTiger simply recreated the fork anyway, ignoring the consensus of both discussions. He argues that this is not  because he's shortened the article, but that's beside the point. He recreated an article that was deleted per ''two'' discussions, and although he made some changes to it, the reasons for deletion are identical, and still apply to the recreated article. If it's not G4 then it's a |snowball - the community already concluded this should be deleted. Twice
— User:Ivanvector, 20:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:G4||WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)