Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lockheed XF-104
and '''Strongly Oppose''' this move which was not discussed on the talk page even though the primary editor made a sincere effort to involve others in the creation of the article and it represents his first attempt at crafting a Wikipedia article. This flies in the face of "don't bite the newcomers." I question the use of an Afd when a merge tag was sufficient. What meagre evidence that was presented also does not coincide with what is now a well written and well researched article on a prototype aircraft that had been featured as a separate chapter in Steve Pace's book, "X-Fighters..." FWIW I am also calling for a '''Speedy conclusion''' under the  clause
— User:Bzuk, 02:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOWBALL (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)