Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (third nomination)
There is no serious prior research linking the quotes, which is why the sections are placed alphabetically rather than in order of importance.  forbids advancing new arguments even from well-verified raw data; the new argument here is that Israel has plenty of company. My impression that this article is a pawn in the battle over articles on Israel is bolstered by arguments here to keep this article because of the continued existence of Allegations of Israeli apartheid. I sympathize with the pro-Israel editors for having had to deal with some maddening  violations, however countering with your own  violation is not the way to go. In addition to the  and  problems, the individual sections of the article are each in blatant violation of 
— User:Clayoquot, 06:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNT||WP:POINT||WP:POINT||WP:OR||WP:POINT||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:No original research)