Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subject–object problem
The article is well sourced and provides a very complete coverage of this subject as defined in its lede and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Subject–object_problem&oldid=660659106#Subjective-objective_dichotomy first subsection. Charges of  or , policies that counter WP editors presenting unsupported conclusions or opinions of their own, are misplaced because there is nothing in this article of that kind. The idea that a philosophy term can be expected to have "an established unambiguously understood use" can be taken only with a smile. In any event, any doubt about the widespread discussion of this topic is dispelled by a https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=%22subject-object+problem%22.&num=10&gws_rd=ssl Google book search for the exact wording  "subject-object problem" (5440 hits) or http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&as_epq=subject-object+problem&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C29 Google scholar. As it is, the article has stood pretty much in its present form for several years with only minor changes. This sudden decision to delete it has appeared from nowhere. The reasons given, there being too many quotations, and that it appears to be a cut-and-paste job, are insubstantial and do not challenge the content as containing specific passages that are misleading, incomplete, or erroneous in some way. If there are objections to particular portions of this article, they can be addressed on its talk page in the manner usually adopted for handling revision suggestions
— User:Brews, 03:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)