Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consulate-General of Pakistan, Chicago
meets , useful and encyclopedic. No indication that deletion of this longstanding article would serve the project's interests. More importantly, the burden of proof should always be on the proponent of deletion, and that burden does not seem to have been carried here. It's not clear that  is intended to apply to government agencies at all (it seems odd that they would be omitted from the laundry list: "charitable organizations, political parties, hospitals, institutions, interest groups, social clubs, companies, partnerships, proprietorships, for-profit educational institutions or organizations, etc.") Even if ORG applies, it's unclear how it is possible to fail a guideline that only states certain conditions for establishing a presumption ''of'' notability. As somebody or other probably said somewhere, the absence of a presumption does not justify a presumption of absence
— User:Visviva, 02:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)