Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory Burnell
I direct the Delete proponents to , which states "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list."  Burrell is mentioned in significant detail in several reliable sources; done deal.  Whether he is now embarrassed by some of his past involvements - as the nom suggests without proffering any evidence of the same - is irrelevant.  Whether he disputes the accuracy of the news reports - again, something a Delete proponent alleges without proffering any evidence of the same - is irrelevant
— User:Ravenswing, 08:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)