Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night of the Day of the Dawn of the Son of the Bride of the Return of the Revenge of the Terror of the Attack of the Evil, Mutant, Alien, Flesh Eating, Hellbound, Zombified Living Dead Part 2: In Shocking 2-D (4th nomination)
Respecting the previous 3 keeps, we have suitable coverage and suitable sourcing for an article on a 20-year-old genre film. Even if seen as only ''just'' making the cut, this one meets through ''just'' enough |coverage and analysis in suitable genre sources,http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/magazin/yazarlar/7716407_p.asp ''Hürriyet'' (Turkish) http://ibnlive.in.com/news/the-longest-film-titles-ever/33760-8.html ''IBN''  http://www.cineman.ch/weblog/beitrag.php?id_beitrag=628 ''Cineman'' (German) http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AT&p_theme=at&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=10E650A954737170&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM''Atlanta Journal-Constitution'' (pay-per-view)  http://www.lavozdeasturias.es/culturas/palabras-nombre-ultimo-disco-fiona-apple-titulos-largos_0_659934174.html''La Voz de Asturias'' (Spanish)  http://www.google.com/search?q=Night+of+the+Day+of+the+Dawn+of+the+Son+of+the+Bride+of+the+Return+of+the+Revenge+of+the+Terror+of+the+Attack+of+the+Evil,+Mutant,+Alien,+Flesh+Eating,+Hellbound,+Zombified+Living+Dead%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=np and others to remain and serve our readers... though with his subsequent films with equally silly and overlong titles it seems Riffle is bent on flogging more than just his horse. As this is this article's 4th nomination, it almost seems a matter of . And I had to fix the Find sources template assigned by this AFD,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FNight_of_the_Day_of_the_Dawn_of_the_Son_of_the_Bride_of_the_Return_of_the_Revenge_of_the_Terror_of_the_Attack_of_the_Evil%2C_Mutant%2C_Alien%2C_Flesh_Eating%2C_Hellbound%2C_Zombified_Living_Dead_Part_2%3A_In_Shocking_2-D_%284th_nomination%29&diff=527906802&oldid=527752520 as "(4th nomination)" is not part of this film's title.  Even if not the recipient of the same sort level of studio hyped coverage as is the Harry Potter or Star Wars films, in meeting #Other evidence of notability|, we have this film having multiple festival screenings and repeated airings more than 5 years after original release, and we have it written of in books in a non-trivial fashion more than 5 years after original release. The article does provide sources where this film IS discussed, even if briefly, in a more-than-trivial fashion. We|do not expect a topic that received coverage 20 years ago to remain in the headlines.   is met, even if ''just barely''. And I will be happy to repeat myself at the 5th nomination in a few months
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 21:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:KEEPLISTINGTILLITGETSDELETED||WP:NF||WP:NTEMP||WP:NF (Wikipedia:Notability)