Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Sehgal (3nd nomination)
per ;  refers explicitly to "'''Poorly sourced''' biographical articles" (my emph.), which this most certainly is not, and therefore does not apply. It also requires that there be "here is no rough consensus", yet, as we are on the third attempt to delete the article, it could be cogently argued that a "rough consensus" has plainly been estabished. In any case, per , "Page deletion is normally a last resort." Other delete !votes fail to present sound policy-based arguments: Greenborg's, for example, is an alphabet soup with no focussed explanation for the soup presented, BLPREQUESTetc does not apply, and other suggestions ('refs are a mess', for example) are pure .  presumably also applies :) Incidentally, regarding the question as to whether BLPREQUEST is relevant, this may well be a continuiation of a previous request; but I note that, actually, the filer has made https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Moona+Sehgal&project=enwiki over 75% of all their edits to ''improving'' (that is ''adding'' material to) the article for the last '''six years'''. &mdash
— User:Fortuna, 12:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ANYBIO||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE||WP:BLPDEL||WP:ATA||WP:IDLI (Wikipedia:Notability)