Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruenor Battlehammer
That assessment is incorrect on at least three points; a) It is not a stub, for, from  a stub is "an article containing only a few sentences of text...  ... Sizable articles are usually not considered stubs, even if they lack wikification or copy editing." b) A main character of a large number of hugely notable books cannot by any stretch of the imagination be considered merely a stock character; it's obvious a heaping helping of  is coloring your vision here from the somewhat contemptuous tone you have employed. c) The notability guideline ''requires'' common sense in order to properly determine whether or not a character is presumed notable; it does not ''require'' the depth of sources you are culling from , particularly since a guideline can never trump a |policy.  If it seems I am repeating myself here, at least I'm not copying-and-pasting (yet
— User:Zahakiel, 17:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:STUB||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:FICT||WP:CONSENSUS (Wikipedia:Stub)