Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Lionel Churchill
I'm not convinced that the CMG provides automatic notability in Wikipedia terms. It indicates that the holder was thought to have done a good job, but this doesn't necessarily translate into Wikipedia-handy sources, which this man seems to be lacking despite a clearly solid career. If he didn't have the CMG there would be little question here but that the article shd be deleted as principally genealogical; and the addition of the CMG without sources doesn't seem to me to tip the balance.  itself surely supports this: "People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards incl WP:ANYBIO #1. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included". (bolding mine
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:ANYBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)