Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Mister Fantastic
Once again,  is determined by the existence of sources, not by whatever sources are or aren't in the article, per , , , , and . The crux of this nomination is {{green|"Unnecessary article split that goes into too much detail about in-universe subjects"}}, seeing as {{green|"fails to justify its existence through the reliable sources needed to pass "}} is irrelevant as far as deletion goes
— User:Darkknight2149, 22:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:DELREASON||WP:NEXIST||WP:ATD||WP:ARTN||WP:NNC (Wikipedia:Notability)