Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clockwork universe theory
While I agree that the , , , and  issues could be addressed by stubbing the article and moving it to Clockwork universe, I'd like to clarify that no one has actually suggested 1) that Clockwork universe be deleted,  2) that Clockwork universe is not a notable analogy, 3) or that the misapplication of the sources in the Clockwork universe theory article also fail . MA, are you suggesting the subject of the article ''ought'' to be that of ''The Clockwork Universe: Isaac Newton, the Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern World''? From the http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/27/books/review/book-review-the-clockwork-universe-by-edward-dolnick.html?_r=0 NY Times review: {{small|"London before the mid-1600s was a general calamity. The streets were full of thieves, murderers and human waste. Death was everywhere: doctors were hapless, adults lived to about age 30, children died like flies. ... This little history begins Edward Dolnick’s “Clockwork Universe,” so the reader might think the book is about the Royal Society and its effects. But the Royal Society is dispatched in the first third of the book, and thereafter, the subject is how the attempt to find the mathematics governing the universe played out in the life of Isaac Newton
— [[User talk:Machine Elf 1735|Machine Elf 1735]], 10:43, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TITLE||WP:NPOV||WP:COATRACK||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Article titles)