Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teens Run Modesto
First off, I didn't look into the discussion at the top in depth, but I don't think that consistently nominating an article under speedy, the prod, then here, is in bad faith per se. It may be otherwise, but I don't see that substantive argument being made above, just the procedural one. My !vote is based on the sources almost exclusively from Modesto: 3 from one week of the Modesto Bee, another two from "Run Modesto", another from the local TV station (same week), and the national ones being, in my estimation, simple announcements of the race/winner. I don't see how any of this is non-trivial coverage that indicates notability. Local marathons (half marathons in this case) will be reported on in the local news, but that doesn't make them notable more widely. In addition, while I see references to the race, I'm unconvinced that these sources really discuss the ''organization'' (the topic of this nomination) in depth enough to qualify under . If someone can point out to me the source that does, I'd change my opinion
— User:Shadowjams, 06:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)