Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictions of the end of Wikipedia
to Criticism of Wikipedia. Per nom and XOReaster, and per . This article as it stands is pure trash. In the lead we have {{tq|Many online encyclopedias exist; proposed replacements for Wikipedia have included Google's since-closed Knol,12 Wolfram Alpha,3 and AOL's Owl.4}} which is ridiculous since Knol is closed and Owl doesn't even have a WP article. The section on "Decline in editing" is something covered in Criticism of Wikipedia. The section "Sources of viewers and funds" the content appears to have zero relevance to the subject, and is cited to a source which also doesn't say anything about Wikipedia ending. The section "Possible antidote" is  -- it talks of automated editing as an "antidote" and cites a single research paper -- (i) which is primary, (ii) which only gives a method for generating articles without commenting on if these methods would take over humans
— NONE, NONE
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOPAGE||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)