Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ntsele
I was going to vote to Redirect back to Hlubi Kings, until I realised this was a very new article and may be a placeholder which the author intends to expand.  This may be a case of .  I recall having a stub that I had created and had under construction deleted by an over-officious admin, so that I had to start my article again.  I was advised to tag such stubs as Underconstruction to avoid that happening.  That was in the days of dial-up connections to the Internet.  Having said that my potential target is a list, which could usefully be fleshed out with dates and other material, including a preamble describing of where their kingdom was.  This all depends on how much is known about the various kings.  If we know little but their names, that may be the best course of action.  I do not favour having articles that will never be expanded beyond a stub, because literally nothing is known
— User:Peterkingiron, 17:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DONOTBITE (Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers)