Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Digital Cable
I got 164 GHits, and a good proportion were WP or mirrors. Mentioned as "new" as of 2006-05-23 http://www.pocketpcmag.com/newsl_jkwg/webguide.asp?id=304 here. Not a fantastically authoratative source I know, and I'm aware that newness doesn't constitute a failure of , but it really doesn't seem notable. technologyguide.com did have a review of their service, but I'm not sure that makes it notable. I also might add that there have been a lot of new and anon users commenting on this AfD in the past, and (probable) sockpuppeting just screams "spam" to me
— User:Ruaraidh, 00:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)