Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 5
I do not believe that the topic of the article meets the |general notability guideline because there aren't multiple reliable sources with significant coverage. The article does provide one, but one is not multiple and the coverage is not particularly different from that of |routine coverage. The information in the article itself is merely |routine coverage, nothing to indicate historical significance or at least a significant lasting effect of the event, so it is unfit for Wikipedia. In its current state, the article falls into WP:!|what Wikipedia is not as it is at best a |news report and the topic does not seem to meet the exception criteria of  due to the lack of independent reliable sources with significant coverage to indicate that the event is notable and there is also no sanctioning body or league to presume that it is inherently notable. The single source that provides a little more in-depth coverage of the event shows, in my personal opinion, potential to improve the article, but it still doesn't justify a stand-alone article. I favor redirection, but since there is no target for a redirect and with only one source with semi-significant coverage, I favor deletion
— User:Jfgslo, 19:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:SPORTSEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)