Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cable 8 Productions
Individual editors' assessments of whether the article is well-written or not are not relevant to whether the topic qualifies for a Wikipedia article or not — and we'll never mind that ''my'' assessment is that this is trending in an |advertorial direction rather than an encyclopedic one, because arguing about differing interpretations of article quality would be an irrelevant digression. The determining factor is whether it can be shown as the ''subject'' of enough media coverage, in ''unaffiliated'' sources, to clear  — but this is not, as its ''only'' citations are to one of the same university's other student media outlets and a press release from the university administration. These are ''not'' independent sources for the purposes of establishing that a topic is notable
— User:Bearcat, 02:45, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTADVERT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)