Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious violence
The above discussions have not refuted the |original research and |synthesis criticisms.  As such, I think any admin or editor who closes the discussion should disregard those opinions advocating keeping the article.  The problem (which no one has yet refuted) is that the article conflates all kinds of unrelated activities: terrorism, ritual mutilation, human and animal sacrifice, and sectarian violence.  There is no support whatsoever for this synthesis having been done by anyone other than the editors.  I don't believe this grouping of diverse types of acts, treated together, could be found in reliable unbiased sources.  They might be treated separately, all of which separate treatement use the phrase "religious violence", but they are not treated together in a notable way.  The idea was conceived and cobbled together by the editors and no one else.  Without a showing that this conflation of all these diverse types of phenomenon are treated together in a notable way by secondary sources, this article plainly fails based on |original research and |synthesis not withstanding any number of "votes" to keep it
— User:Mamalujo, 17:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYN||WP:OR||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)