Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contrarian Journalism
In its original state it read as a personal essay with |original research and synthesis of various sources into a whole somewhat less than the sum of its parts. To claim Muggeridge as a "contrarian journalist" there needs to be at least one |reliable source which covers this as more than a passing mention. In its current state, as I write this, it is a icdef|dictionary definition for a neologism. Neither form belongs in an encyclopaedia
— User:Beeswaxcandle, 02:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:D (Wikipedia:No original research)