Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why I Am Not a Christian
This is what http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/22/books/review/Holt.t.html?ex=1188360000&en=3798461d78ae3d18&ei=5070 The New York Times calls a "classic 1927 essay". As stated above, it definitely passes  because "The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable, even in the absence of secondary sources
— User:Spellcast, 15:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)