Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fish Information and Services (2nd nomination)
I agree that is a useful reliable source with content that could be usefully added to the article.  I appreciate I am now a little bit jaded with the whole debate but ...  I am not sure actually if the reliable source confirms notability to either  or  standards - it is not significant coverage in more than one source - we need a couple of sources.  I note that the source provided states ''FIS so far has had only a few profitable months, but added that his company is "very close to achieving profitability." ''  To me lack of profitability is kind of an indicator of lack of notability - not entirely fair and outside the guideline but
— User:Matilda, 01:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)