Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corinna Löckenhoff
I said that I'd reconsider {{tq|if the subject ''unambiguously'' withdraws her deletion request}}. She has https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FCorinna_L%C3%B6ckenhoff&type=revision&diff=935532723&oldid=935531614 now done so. Consequently, that's no longer a factor. I still think everything else I wrote above applies: decent case for #C1 just by citation numbers, but not great sourcing to actually base an article on, and #C3 not really coming into play. So, my re-evaluation lands me where I hypothesized that it would were the situation different, because now the situation has changed. ({{u|Levivich}}, thanks for pinging me. In turn, I will ping {{u|Yngvadottir}} and {{u|Ealdgyth}}, who have "per XOR" in their comments below
— User:XOR, 05:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)