Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very Serious People
Of the three rationales given, two of them are obviously invalid. ? There is no evidence that this is in any way temporary or tied to any event. #DICTIONARY? This is clearly not an article that contains nothing more than a definition. Not even close. The proposer would be well advised in the future to pick one ''good'' rationale rather than throwing several against the wall and seeing if any of them stick. This leaves , the only rationale that comes even close to being valid. The problem is, the article has enough coverage to meet our |general notability guideline
— User:Guy, 04:20, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:NOT||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)