Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo On (2nd nomination)
as not passing  with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as /RS. I only see the semi-secondary 1UP piece (already in article) and non-in-depth 99lives piece, and nothing more except primary (by video creater) or unreliable pieces (forums and boards). Just to be clear, an article ''about'' a hoax is okay, the argument here is that it doesn't pass GNG or . I don't think any content belongs in Wii or anything Nintendo-related, but may be in a list of (sourced) hoaxes if such were to exist. —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 16:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:VG||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)