Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dictionary of Words in the Wild
It's definitely , but the project is only a year oldhttp://www.iath.virginia.edu/lists_archive/Humanist/v20/0534.html and has received no significant coverage in secondary sources to date (per Google Books, Google Scholar, Google News Archive
— User:Dhartung, 21:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INTERESTING (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)