Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raheem Sterling (3rd nomination)
Clearly fails the "not fit for purpose" , however clearly meets . For those above who doubt the sources exist have a read of : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1357850/Raheem-Sterling-cast-spell-Dalglish-Liverpool.html Boy wonder Sterling has cast a spell on Dalglish at Liverpool (dailymail.co.uk) or http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/raheem-sterling-in-line-to-become-liverpools-youngest-player-2216508.html Raheem Sterling in line to become Liverpool's youngest player (independent.co.uk) or http://www.givemefootball.com/premier-league/gunners-to-sign-english-wonderkid Gunners to sign English wonderkid givemefootball.com the fist two clearly independent of the sport. In answer to those who believe that  trumps  - read , the community wide consensus is that if you pass  then you (with some exceptions) qualify for an article, a smaller group can not override that to suit there aims
— User:Mtking, 00:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NSOCCER||WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG||WP:CONLIMITED||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)