Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcendence: Healing and Transformation Through Transcendental Meditation
I had a look around, and decided to go with the keep option here.  Reasons:  On the  side I think there's enough ''significant coverage'' over ''reliable source'' (Fox news, USA Today, CNN, WSJ, NY Times, LA Times, etc.) that I think it could stand on that alone to some extent.  While a couple of those are "self published" in that Rosenthal was the author - it does persuade me to the point of number 5 in the criteria of the  guideline. (which I find to be a bit undefined if not ambiguous).  Not saying he's an Edgar Allan Poe or anything, but his GA article certainly establishes him as a notable author.  Now  won't tell us if the book will win any awards (still too early in its release for that) - the fact that it has made some of the best seller lists I find also persuasive.  guess that about covers it from my view.  ty, and luck to all
— User:Ched, 16:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NB||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Notability)