Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Craigslist killers
This term appears 1,700+ times in http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=%22craigslist%20killer%22&sa=N&safe=off&tab=wn&um=1 sources so I dunno what the nom means. If the list contains non-notable cases, they can be removed... that doesn't require article deletion. This clearly passes  criteria 4 and 10 due to the sources. I think criteria 1 is hopelessly subjective (you could say a list of county seats in California was created "just for the sake of having such a list"). As for the "list is of interest to a very limited number of people" or "the list is unencyclopaedic" arguments, I dunno, I can see that. But then again, 1700 sources... it may be a silly trend in my opinion, but it's one the media apparently cares about. I think there's enough sources to justify some sort of an article here... maybe a list is a silly format, but nevertheless deletion isn't called for
— User:Chiliad22, 13:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LC (Wikipedia:Listcruft)