Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpretive science
Obvious content fork, obvious synth issues, obvious non-notable |neologism which is not being widely used by anyone.  Some editors above are claiming lots of |google hits on "interpretive science" or "interpretive research", but these google hits do not prove that the science community uses this term with any particular meaning in mind.  It is merely a noun and an adjective put together to describe something else, not a widely recognized scientific methodology.  Redirect to one of the abovementioned forks may be appropriate
— User:Snottywong, 23:38, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:GHITS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)