Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Sears
The article as it was before the nominator and a previous editor committed major surgery on it was clearly over-promotional. However, a quick glance through GScholar seems to give the subject an h-index of about 28, which in most fields would be taken as fairly strong evidence of meeting #1. Though (particularly seeing the amount of multiple authorship in the subject's publications) I am willing to be told I am wrong
— User:PWilkinson, 15:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)