Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of instant messaging clients (2nd nomination)
Article is well referenced.  Likewise, the article is well maintained as shown by the revision history statistics which shows that the article goes no longer than one (1) day without an individual editing the page as shown here http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/articleinfo/index.php?article=Comparison_of_instant_messaging_clients&lang=en&wiki=Wikipedia.  In addition the page shows 22,905 views within the last 30 days, as shown here http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Comparison_of_instant_messaging_clients.  Finally, looks like we have a 153 Wikipedia’s watching the page, as shown here http://toolserver.org/~mzmcbride/watcher/?db=enwiki_p&titles=Comparison_of_instant_messaging_clients.  All-in-all looks like a well maintained – useful list and not just; ..." |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information
— User:Shoessss, 15:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)