Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shitposting
WP:NEOLOGISM doesn't apply in this case because reliable sources have used the term, and its use is already popular on web forums, so its inclusion here isn't part of a campaign to increase its usage.  doesn't apply because the sources provided do provide encyclopedic coverage of the term beyond just the definition. ''The Independent'' discusses the demographics of shitposting, http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/what-is-shitposting-donald-trump-us-election-2016-palmer-luckey-a7326111.html, and the ''Engineering and Technology'' article focuses on the political implications of shitposting. https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2016/09/view-from-washington-palmer-luckey/. Other sources, like the piece from ''The Guardian'' above cover the real-world impacts of shitposting and go far beyond just mere dictionary definitions
— User:Patar, 20:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIC (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)