Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heisenberg's paradoxical criterion
Aspects of old material spun up with a novel and utterly non-notable analysis, precisely what the previously-mentioned-here {{user|W.GUGLINSKI}} was blocked for performing non-stop. Maybe Guglinski could have made this clear to you, seeing he was blocked precisely for ignoring numerous warnings of it, but unless a theory or analysis has received coverage in independent |reliable sources (i.e. peer-reviewed journal articles that neither you nor your friends had anything to do with), it is going to be deleted. Citing Dirac and Heisenberg isn't going to get you anywhere as they're ''probably'' not publishing anymore, and Guglinski's papers are worthless as far as Wikipedia guidelines are concerned. Or maybe you ''are'' Guglinski. Either way, I hope I've made this pretty clear
— User:Someguy1221, 03:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)