Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankheg (2nd nomination)
As per my comment above the article's subject fails , as it has a single third-party reliable source that is independent of the article's subject, and that single reference has zero significant coverage of the article's subject, giving no level of detail.  The two sources ("Into the Green" and "Pathfinder") that are being used as "keep" rationales are not independent of the article's subject; they are suppliment books for the game system this creature is used for.  |"Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject.  As the subject is a creature in the Dungeons & Dragons tabletop roleplaying game, it cannot be said that suppliment books published for that game system are independent sources. (Disclaimer: This AfD was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SudoGhost&diff=497276544&oldid=497269822 brought to my attention by an editor on my talk page, seemingly due to my https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Afanc_%28Dungeons_%26_Dragons%29&diff=497267472&oldid=497263999 comment on a related AfD, and while I think getting my attention in this way was inappropriate, my comments are my own conclusion of the article
— User:SudoGhost, 21:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)