Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Schroeder
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS|The existence of other poor articles on Wikipedia is not a valid argument for keeping this bad article.  I have nominated this article based on my interpretation of the Wikipedia guidelines and the existing sources.  If others disagree with my interpretation of the guidelines or the facts in evidence, then they can disagree with me, and the |consensus may be reached that the article should be kept.  I have no personal opinion about Schroeder at all: I have never heard of her nor have I ever read any of her works.  I've never read any of Charles Dickens' works either, and would very likely despise any that I did read (that's just not my favored style of literature), but I can recognize his notability without having read him
— User:WikiDan61, 20:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CONSENSUS (Wikipedia:Consensus)