Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unusual eBay listings
unless evidence of notability for the concept underlying this list can be provided. I'm no kneejerk deleter of weird lists; in fact, I've been an outspoken defender of several weird lists here. In order to defend such a list, it is necessary to show |reliable sourced coverage for the concept underlying the list -- ideally mainstream reliably source coverage. The article does not show evidence that the concept has obtained such coverage, and my Google searches find only non-RS interest in this topic. Additionally, there's no indication yet of a defensible set of inclusion criteria (tickling somebody's funnybone doesn't qualify
— User:Orlady, 23:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)