Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's immigration crisis
ndash; The rationales for deletion are wanting.   First, the majority of them are  problems that are not a valid reason to delete the article.  "Articles should not be deleted as punishment because no one has felt like cleaning them up yet."  Per , in "the Wiki model, an article which may currently be poorly written, poorly formatted, lack sufficient sources, or not be a comprehensive overview of the subject, can be improved and rewritten to fix its current flaws."  So the fact that the title is wrong or it's not the world's most academic prose is not a reason to delete the article.  Also, maybe some people think the article is somehow offensive or non-neutral, but that problem is not similar to the stated examples of low-quality content that might warrant deletion ("problems like copyright infringement, advertising, patent nonsense, or unsourced negative statements in biographies of living people").  Second,  is completely inapplicable.  It says "For example, routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia."  This highly visible controversy is not in any way akin to "routine news reporting on ... celebrities."  If the subject of an article is in the news, that doesn't mean that the subject is ''not'' notable.  Moreover, the article has a variety of non-newspaper sources, like the report of the UN refugee commissioner.  Overall, I think this is just another instance of a misguided "attack of the it's-not-a-newspaper police
— User:Agnosticaphid, 01:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:UGLY||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)