Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/François Asselineau (4th nomination)
I would be hardpressed to find many Delete grounds more specious, insulting and - indeed - reprehensible than that there are editors on another Wikipedia who find an article's existence here inconvenient.  Now perhaps the French Wikipedia operates off of different rules, but here on the English Wikipedia ''all'' notability criteria are ''subordinate'' to , which establishes nothing more than that a subject has been discussed in significant detail in multiple reliable sources.  Period.  It doesn't matter whether he's a notable politician or not -  is subordinate to the GNG.  It doesn't matter whether the reasons for this coverage are silly.  It doesn't matter whether or not he's a self-promoter.  It doesn't matter whether there's enough biographical information in print to write a credible biography of the man.  What matters is this: ''does he meet the GNG?''  He does, by quite a comfortable margin.  Done bloody deal.  Startlingly enough, '''the nom concedes that he does in this diff:''' http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FFran%C3%A7ois_Asselineau_%284th_nomination%29&diff=481648862&oldid=481648569  Perhaps the editors of the French Wikipedia can tend to their own knitting, and we'll tend to ours.  (The question of why the existence of this article ''bothers'' them so much we'll table to another time and place.)Beyond anything else, given Nyttend's cogent point that the subject's position as a Parisian city councillor is normally the sort cited as a pass on , the Council of Paris is the legislative body for the ''department'' of Paris, giving Asselineau a clear pass on criterion #1 as a provincial legislator
— User:Ravenswing, 19:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:POLITICIAN (Wikipedia:Notability)