Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew dwyer
per nomination. There are two problems here. The first one is verifiablity: a great deal of biographical data given is unsourced and at the moment appears unverifiable. Perhaps this could be fixed in time but there is a problem with  now. The larger issue is notability. None of the references listed are directly cited in the article and most of them do not qualify as independent third-party reliable sources with ontrivial coverage as required by . A few sources are OK such as thishttp://www.sptimes.com/2007/07/16/State/Can_a_Democratic_sher.shtml and thishttp://www.fladems.com/content/w/democrats_look_to_take_back_panhandle_position_from_republicans, but they contain only very brief and cursory mentions of him. I tried some google searching, but with a common name like this it is hard to do filtering and I did not really find anything of substance. A google news search for ''"Andrew Dwyer" DVS'' gives 1 hithttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22Andrew+Dwyer%22+DVS, but the link there is broken. Not enough here to pass  or . Unless more independent third-party reliable sources are found (either in large number or a few with in-depth coverage), the article would have to be deleted
— User:Nsk92, 22:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:N (Wikipedia:Verifiability)