Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathy Malchiodi
She has a large number of GS citations for  C1, but looking through them, an unusually large number appear to be erroneous or repeated.  I searched in Scopus, and still believe in the NPROF case, but it's weaker than first appears.  However, the NPROF case is supported by .  She has a large number of books, and while the number of reviews is relatively small, I think it's a weak pass.  http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n88151383/ Worldcat helps support, showing many books held by hundreds or thousands of libraries.  Combining the two, I think it's a solid keep case.  The article is not in great shape, with puffery, a completely unsourced "Research and achievements" section, etc etc
— User:Russ, 00:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)