Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Elmhurst, Illinois
into Elmhurst, Illinois or '''Delete''' &mdash; No evidence at all of ; plenty of evidence that this is an occasionally-used neighborhood/directional name, not a separate place.  Even when I look for "South Elmhurst" history on Google, about half the time it shows up with a lower-case "s" instead of "S" in "south".  My guess is that it probably has a USGS GNIS entry because it had a railroad stop at some point: http://www.dupagehistory.org/dupage_roots/Elmhurst_8.htm "Elmhurst" in ''DuPage Roots'' says "The coming of the Chicago Great Western Railroad in 1887 and the Illinois Central in 1888 stimulated commercial and residential development in south Elmhurst." (Note lower-case "s".)  I also found the name as a cutoff point for a section of rail line in https://books.google.com/books?id=LCsoAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA84&dq=%22South%20Elmhurst%22%20history&pg=PA84#v=onepage&q=%22South%20Elmhurst%22%20history&f=false ''Past History and Future Prospects of the Great Chicago Western Railway Company'' (1900), p. 84.   A USGS GNIS entry is not recognition as a legal, or even statistical, entity.  Methinks Carlossuarez46 (to use his own words) didn't look too hard into what USGS GNIS classes indicate, and criticizes based on incomplete information and a false assumption.  (Boilerplate I'm using for all these nominations: This is a series of  articles by {{user|Bnnnperdue}}, each one using a USGS GNIS entry, then copy-pasted claims from other towns or patently-false claims about being incorporated place|incorporated or otherwise a legally-autonomous entity or having some other significant history, so that it appears to the casual viewer that  applies or otherwise gives the façade of meeting , and a mess like this deletion discussion ensues.  In each case, the bulk of the article has been fantasy, often provably false, sometimes with alleged locator maps, also invented by Bnnnperdue.  USGS GNIS populated place entries only mean that a place with that name was once on a map or reported to exist at some point; lots of USGS GNIS entries have no significant cultural history and don't meet ; for example, many were mere train stops or intersections with few buildings or other activity.  Given the creator's hoax history over the last few months, there's no reason to presume that a subject is/was notable; go look at
— User:Closeapple, 19:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:HOAX||WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)