Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Heller
per the above, it seems completely untenable to suggest an article created a long time ago with over 500 edits by the nominator was done "in error".  The actual history of the article appears revealing edit summary such as "(art split off and moved from userpage without user's approval or consent, in an act of hidden vandalism)" and it's original userfication do support the suggestion that the nominator is actually complaining about their lack of ability to have long term exclusive control on the article, |not a free webhost. Irrespective G7 is not a "will" be deleted, but "can" be deleted, we aren't in the business of deleting encyclopedic material to fulfil some bureaucratic process (|not a bureacracy etc
— [[User_talk:Pgk|pgk]], 10:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)