Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Tucker (2nd nomination)
I wasn't going to bring the article up for deletion again, but no ''specific'' claim of  or  has been substantiated.  Yet.  As of a few hours ago, there were few sources which (clearly had, or were claimed to have) significant coverage about ''him'', rather than about his works or cases.  One of the "better" (i.e., most used as an example justifying ) sources was about one of his ''subjects'', with any comment about him or his works being secondary.  As for the specifics above, the second reference above is about the book Life Before Life (and is not strong evidence that the book is notable; it could easily be sponsored by the book publisher), and the research bursary is '''clearly''' not notable, as has been pointed out before
— User:Arthur, 23:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)