Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of furry comics
As I understand it, having a related category is not an argument against having a list. What  does state is: "Notability of lists ... is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources ...; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list." I am trying to find whether furry comics have been discussed as a group or set in reliable independent sources. "Funny animal" comics (or comics featuring anthropomorphic characters) certainly have - not surprisingly, as they have been around for over 100 years. I haven't yet found any RS discussing "furry comics" as a group, so they may not meet . I'll do some more searching
— User:RebeccaGreen, 09:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:Notability)