Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Giles
appears to clearly pass criterion 1 of . It does seem somewhat surprising and sad for a new editor to start off by trying to remove an article with their very first logged-on edit, rather than adding to the encyclopedia.  is only an essay but is worth reading, and is partly relevant here. There are undoubtedly many notable palaeontologists, and other scientists of all disciplines, all eras, both sexes, who ought to have articles and haven't yet. Plenty to work on in a positive direction, and much more rewarding than taking time to propose deletions
— User:PamD, 16:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Notability)