Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable events in American television in January 2012
What you should have done is go through  and used the {{Split2}} template so that readers and constant editors could actually comment on the article before deciding on a split. Also, one to one isn't any kind of consensus; that's a draw at best and at worst out of basic policy. Just throwing on "TooLong" and thinking that would build up any consensus was unacceptable. I check the article 3-4 times a week and never knew there was a split discussion going on, and unless someone checks the talk page (very rare as most of the editors there build consensus through article content rather than talk), they would've never known about the split. As it is though putting the content in separate articles lost most of the context of each month and since some items are related to actions from other months, readers would be lost without being able to know something else happened months before (e.g. the AMC Networks/Dish and Cablevision/Trib disputes). And if the issue is the length of text, that's something easily dealt with through consensus rather than deletion, and there's no way 2012IAT should be deleted because there, every item '''must''' be sourced before its added in
— User:Mrschimpf, 17:28, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SPLIT (Wikipedia:Splitting)