Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyoncé's Fifth Studio Album (2nd nomination)
while the sources described in the article aren't reliable, information exists for this topic in sources generally respected as reliable, and easily found by typing in 'beyonce's next album' or 'beyonce's new album', and already listed on Beyoncé_Knowles.  these include MTV, billboard, vogue and rolling stone.  the topic is therefore notable.   includes a provision for the inclusion of unreleased materials that are verifiable, which, while not entirely relevant, i believe should infer that the verifiable information on this topic should justify it's inclusion under the spirit of this criteria.  because the example for  refers to media specific guidelines for notability, i believe the prior justification extends to this criteria as well.  this means any deletions should be justified by  or perhaps an argument that the information is better suited to inclusion on beyoncés main page.  I believe the latter argument is inappropriate because it would require a merge-unmerge process once we get a name, while keeping it in a separate, vaguely named article would ease the transition once a name is found.  As for , the boundary between reliable source information and reliable source speculation is pretty thin, and I am making an individual decision that the extant information is the former
— User:Romnempire, 18:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NALBUMS||WP:TOOSOON||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)