Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Krippner
While I understand the author angle, the article is ''not'' written in that context. Rather, the article paints him quite clearly as an academic &ndash; necessitating  as our yardstick. Corollary: if you want to eval him as an author, re-write the article as such. I'm afraid that as an academic, his impact does not seem to be very high. I used this Web of Science|WoS query: "Author (krippner s*) Refined by: Institutions=(SAYBROOK INST OR SAYBROOK GRAD SCH OR SAYBROOK GRAD SCH & RES CTR OR SAYBROOK INST GRAD SCH OR SAYBROOK INST GRAD SCH & RES CTR OR SAYBROOK INST PSYCHOL OR SAYBROOK UNIV) Timespan=All Years. Databases=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI", finding 29 journal articles (plus other stuff like book reviews and abstracts) for an h-index of 6. His highest-impact article has 141 cites, but this paper has >30 authors with his name appearing about a quarter of the way through, so it would be difficult to assign a large portion of the credit to him personally. With an h of 6, the citation count obviously falls off extremely rapidly. I do not argue that his number of "publications" is large &ndash; I checked http://stanleykrippner.weebly.com/--complete-bibliography.html his CV, as suggested by the anon above, and there is indeed a lot listed there. The problem again is that his scholarship has clearly not had much of an impact in the  sense. Respectfully
— User:Agricola44, 22:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)