Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dungeons & Dragons creatures
I keep hearing replies that this nomination is misguided, that there are independent sources, etc. Well: ''where are they''? Why should this article get a pass on having no independent importance when so many others do not? Why is proof by assertion sufficient here? As for , how am I gaming the system or acting in bad faith? I genuinely believe that these articles do not meet notability, as they have no independent sources. Concerning the decision to list several, there are about 200 entries in the D&D monster category. They should mostly be deleted. People complain if many articles are listed at once. These articles are all basically the same, and should be treated the same
— User:Eyrian, 12:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)