Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Aaron
this will sound very unfair, I apologise in advance for that.  All the things you have stated are true, of that I am sure.  Some of them, if reported in |reliable sources could well add up to notability.  They may not.  But Wikipedia is not interested in Truth.  It is interested in verifiability.  A lie is as encyclopaedic as the truth if it is notable (look at conspiracy theories) and verifiable.  It is extremely difficult ''knowing'' that one has what look like quite magnificent achievements and having to understand that they are only acceptable here when verified independently in reliable sources
— User:Timtrent, 22:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)