Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARDOR
The ''Forbes'' sources are contributor blogs and not staff pieces, which means they are not subject to editorial oversight and are opinion rather than reporting. ''CoinCentral's'' piece finishes up with the caveat "CoinCentral's owners, writers, and/or guest post authors may or may not have a vested interest in any of the above projects and businesses." ''International Business Times'' looks like a good article, but ''Yahoo News'' is a replica of that piece. The ''CoinSpeaker'' piece is only a passing mention as is ''NewsBTC''. The ''VentureBeat'' piece qualifies for . Then there is a slew of sketchy looking blogs or primary sources. The ''International Business News'' and ''VentureBeat'' pieces are not enough in my opinion to assert notability on their own, and the rest aren't of any value
— User:Isingness, 23:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)