Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basket of deplorables
with no strong position on a '''Redirect''') - I'm surprised to see so many experienced users supporting keeping this. Maybe deserves a brief mention in the campaign/candidacy articles because it ''has'' received coverage, of course, but Wikipedia is  and every news cycle "controversy"-of-the-week doesn't need a stand-alone article (/) when we have articles on the campaign, candidates, candidacies, elections, etc. Not opposed to recreation after the election, once lasting significance can be displayed, but it would really need a lot more to merit a stand-alone article. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 18:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOPAGE||WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)