Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James M. McCanney
I spent some time reading in hopes of finding some claim as to what problem was solved, but only saw an ever-increasing crackpot index.  Charitably, this is |original research unfit for Wikipedia; less charitably, it's a probably a scam.  It's just possible that his physics is good, but his math is worse than wrong: it's gibberish
— User:CRGreathouse, 02:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)