Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tauseef Bukhari
there are a few different sources cited in the article, along with the (marginal) pass of , providing enough room to consider that further work may lead to  being met. I note that there is no reference at all by the nominator in the AfD of having done even trivial  searches, let alone the searches in non-Anglophone sources which would be required for this subject (likely in both Urdu and Cantonese) in line with the approach at . No evidence to support the assertion that that subject is "non-notable". I might change my view on this one if I felt that there the appropriate  checks had been conducted and were referenced in the AfD to provide verifiability, but that's simply not the case here
— User:DevaCat1, 13:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATHLETE||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)