Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinsmores, California
I think at this point we can simply call  on all of {{u|Carlossuarez46}}'s 2009 California articles which are referenced only to GNIS/Durham. The essence of a TNT situation is: {{tq|"if the article's content is useless (including all the versions in history) but the title might be useful, then delete the content to help encourage a new article. If you keep the article, then you're keeping something of no value until someone replaces it with something of value, when people tend to be more inclined to fill red links"}}. This is clearly that kind of situation - these articles exist, which dissuades anyone from creating them in better form, but they are also garbage, with probably ''at most'' 1-in-20 being a  pass and then only with detailed research for each one of those 20. GNIS is a bad source, and Durham may be a good source but it has not been cited correctly whenever it has been checked (i.e., the locales it is being referenced for aren't communities that were ever inhabited). Much better for the project to delete all and then recreate the ones that can be recreated. {{u|Reywas92}}, {{u|Cxbrx}},{{u|Hog Farm}}, {{u|Mangoe}} (users pinged as they have all recently contributed in AFDs involving California locales only sourced to GNIS/Durham) - I would support simply adding all of these California location articles that are cited only to GNIS/Durham and TNTing them in one go rather than separately PROD/AFD for each one
— User:FOARP, 09:10, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:GEOLAND (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)