Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xinsheng Ling
per nom, {{u|Espresso Addict}}. Fails . There's only ''one'' article that even comes ''close'' to |reliable, independent source coverage in the Boston BizJournal https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/mass-high-tech/2009/05/nabsys-nabs-4m-for-dna-sequencing.html here and even, ''then'', it may be non-qualifying trivial coverage. The two "keep" !votes are (a) reminded this is |not a vote and (b) that passing an SNG like  does ''not'' confer otability. It's more or less a rough guideline that, typically, professors are notable, but they are, expressly and unequivocally, '''not''' substitutes for . This professor has lots of co-author mentions in research papers and for writing chapters of textbooks, but there's nothing ''about'' him that is both ''in-depth'' and ''at length''. Thus, it's a hard '''delete'''. I don't see any other way this can close, to be honest; failing that
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:NOTVOTE||WP:NPROF||WP:N||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)