Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shout Out UK
of course the vandalism campaign shouldn't count against the article as it has no bearing on notability and we have tools to lock down the article if needed.  It's an interesting case because the paper probably meets our definition of a |reliable source itself and yet is |non-notable.  While we have somewhat lax notability standards when judging RS notability (in part because RS rarely write about other RS), try as I might I can't find anything to justify an article.  I've reviewed the sources in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shout_Out_UK&oldid=647959223 an earlier version of the article, the current version, and done my own search.  Everything was either clearly not-independent (written by the paper or its founder), clearly trivial coverage (one-two line mentions), or clearly not reliable (pay-for-play writeups).  I am open to changing my mind, but right now I just can't justify a keep !vote
— User:ThaddeusB, 20:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)