Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales of the Questor
and '''Comment''':  The deletion log for the award contained very valid and substantial arguments from which the closing administrator could have easily referenced in deciding to delete the article.  Some of the "I hate furries" comments that you are lumping together do not actually claim any bias against furries.  There does not seem to be anything procedurally wrong with the removal of that article as being on a non-notable subject.  If you disagree you are always welcome to put it up for |deletion review.  The arguments for keep did not address the problem of reliably sourced coverage of the awards outside of its community in order to meet the guidelines of the encyclopedia making them wholly unconvincing (keep 'because people need to find this info somewhere' or 'because another article mentions it' are not valid criteria).  In fact, the second argument presents a "notability creep" problem.  If a notable subject relates to a non-notable one but notability is transferred in this manner, then if in the non-notable article (like this one) another non-notable subject is related, then this third article gets written referencing the second's "notability".  Nip and Tuck, also submitted for AfD, is an example of this "notability creep" which is deriving its notability because Tales of the Questor won a supposedly notable award and both were written by the same author.  This webcomic fails WP:WEB due to non-notability
— User:Ju66l3r, 19:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DRV (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)