Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edius
This is easily the silliest nomination for deletion that I've seen in a while.  It took literally 10 minutes to find 3 sources, which I've added; I'm satisfied I could find as many more as anyone wants.  If you click the books link, it's obvious this software is well-known and that many writers have published mentions of the product.  This product easily clears the bar for notability as required by .  Further, nom is simply wrong in labeling this article as "spam vandalism"; I don't believe he knows what the term |vandalism means on WP
— User:Msnicki, 18:24, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:VANDAL (Wikipedia:Notability)