Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media coverage of Bernie Sanders (4th nomination)
or '''merge''' with Media coverage of the 2016 United States presidential election or a similar article. Per : ''Information should not be included in this encyclopedia solely because it is true or useful. A Wikipedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject''. US presidential elections get enormous, saturation-volume media coverage and even minor details would be sufficient to pass the |GNG, but that doesn't mean we should have an article on them. Taking a longer view I don't think Bernie Sanders is going to be nearly significant enough to justify this kind of treatment. While he's an influential figure now, he's also a US Senator known for unsuccessfully seeking the Democratic presidential nomination twice, and I don't think he will be widely remembered, say, fifty years from now. Imagine how people would feel about an article on, say, Media coverage of George McGovern. I also think it's significant that this article consists almost entirely of statements some person or group has made about media coverage of Bernie Sanders, referenced to the place where those statements were made. The coverage apparently doesn't allow building a narrative, as opposed to a series of isolated quotes
— User:Hut, 07:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)