Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Extreme Championship Wrestling
Yes admittedly, the article is a mess now of  and does not cite sources for much that is written, BUT lots of good articles start out that way. ECW is a major and notable wrestling brand that a lot of famous pro-wrestling stars started from (hence the notability/importance of its history). To label it as "wrestlecruft" and mark it for deletion is a classic example of  reasoning. Putting cleanup or other relevant tags on the article, or raising questions in the talk page, or even being bold and attempting to directly solve the article's alleged faults, is the way to solve content problems. The AfD process should be reserved for cases where the existence of the article itself is questionable under Wikipedia policy (I took that comment from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starship Enterprise|here
— User:Eqdoktor, 09:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:No original research)