Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Nessman
or stubbify. Almost completely |unsourced attempt at |literary criticism; only one sentence is sourced from a secondary source. While the topic might be notable, it's better to rewrite the article from scratch, based on |secondary sources, rather than keep some random Wikipedian's #ESSAY|essay around forever in the hope it is brought up to standards. I'm not convinced the topic passes  based on that single source
— User:Pohta, 09:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:OR||WP:SECONDARY||WP:NOT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)