Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facter
the subject satisfies  & . In my own looking, I quickly and easily found reliable, independent sources. I acknowledge that the article does |need work however that is not a proper #REASON|deletion rational (See , , , etc).  I would remind the {{u|Brittabrowsler|nominator}} and {{u|Michig}} that notability is based upon |sources BEING available and not upon their use in an article.  A better approach would to work to improve this article rather than delete it because it is an ugly
— User:Dan, 05:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG||WP:UGLY||WP:DEL||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:HANDLE||WP:IMPROVE||WP:NRVE (Wikipedia:Notability)