Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intrevention
Nonsense, , etc. Also don't see any proof that this is a real definition of either intrevention or intervention; all 56 GBooks hits are clearly using it as a misspelling of intervention. http://books.google.com/books?q=intrevention. On the basis of having so many GBooks hits, maybe redirect to intervention after deletion? However, I don't see the fact that it's been in the (''non''-subject-sorted) :Category:Articles needing expert attention for x months to mean anything at all; does anyone really look through that category besides statistics bots? What's the likelihood that a business expert is just gonna happen to click through all the way to 'I
— User:CaliforniaAliBaba, 03:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WINAD (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)