Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trademob
I agree with the nom's assessment that the article is still somewhat promotional, and befittingly for a mobile ad company, they really know how to pump out the PR. I found one article that qualifies as an independent source and is in depth: http://gigaom.com/2012/08/31/report-40-percent-of-mobile-clicks-are-fraud-or-accidents/ GigaOM article on click fraud. Is GigaOM considered reliable? If so, then this source counts as an RS. But one RS is still below  notability guidelines and below  notability guidelines as well. Unless more reliable sources can be found, I recommend deletion with no prejudice to recreation if more RS become available
— User:Mark, 05:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)