Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia
ec) More than enough significant coverage in reliable sources for verifiability and notability. #NEWS talks about 'routine' news coverage - there is no way that the wide international coverage of this event, which is the first time this has arisen in the UK, could be described as a routine event. The example one of the delete opinions above gave involving job losses is unfortunatly a routine event so should does fall under NOT#NEWS. NOT#NEWS also talks about historical significance of an event and I feel that the first event in the UK which has got significant coverage about an instance of censorship is historically significant
— User:Davewild, 13:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)