Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeachPie
selectively to Phalanger (compiler)#Legacy, where it is discussed. Too many citations is a bogus reason for deletion, as this is an editing issue and AFD is not for cleanup. On the issue of notability, I found third party coverage in https://www.infoworld.com/article/3043974/peachpie-compiler-aims-to-bring-php-to-net.html InfoWorld, https://thenextweb.com/dd/2017/02/28/company-figured-run-wordpress-net/ TheNextWeb, https://www.i-programmer.info/programming/php/10193-peachpie-open-source-php-to-net-compiler.html i-programmer, and http://phpmagazine.net/2017/02/peachpie-the-php-compiler-and-runtime-for-net.html PHP magazine. The last is just a PR announcement, but the Infoworld article is a reasonable source and the TheNextWeb and i-programmer sources are not gold standard, but I think qualify as independent sources. In terms of notability, amount of coverage is right at threshold for me, but perhaps under threshold for the AfC editors. What is clear is that there is verifiable information on this topic and our policy is to preserve verifiable information per . A reasonable compromise that preserves such information would be a selective merge based on the reliable sources--an expansion of the Legacy section in the Phalanger (compiler)|Phalanger article could be a good target. Hence, merge. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
— User:Mark, 23:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)