Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Hatch
Per the http://www1.ncaa.org/membership/governance/assoc-wide/executive_committee/docs/2005/2005-10/s10_centennial.pdf NCAA, more than 3.5 million people have participated in the NCAA. You cannot logically argue that all 3.5 million of those people are notable for Wikipedia inclusion. Once again, it's not an ignore all rules argument. It's a "read the entire policy and use common sense" argument. Nothing in  says that meeting this criteria guarantees inclusion. And - as I have pointed out numerous times - the policy states "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." In addition, the policy also says, "Competitors who have played or competed at the highest level in amateur sports (who meet the general criteria of secondary sources published about them)". I don't see anywhere that he meets the secondary source criteria. Everything is either trivial mentions or in the context of something else. All of the keep arguments seem to be ignoring the last part of the policy
— User:Smashville, 19:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)