Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vintage print
perhaps make a footnote in some photography article. While it looking bad and being unreferenced are not appropriate deletion criteria,  is, and I may be stretching with it a tad here, but the way the subject is described in the article is basically a definition, and a seemingly subjective one at that
— User:Tpdwkouaa, 05:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIC (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)