Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Fuchsia
I'm going with "Keep" here. I was reading about it elsewhere, and came to Wikipedia to find more about it, hoping for more detail than is currently in the article. The only caveat I have is that most of the external coverage I see is in the last week or so, so it's ''possible'' that this might be a case of . But I'd rather err on the side of retention. If it turns out to have just been newsworthy rather than notable in the long run, we can always revisit it for deletion in another six months or so
— User:TJRC, 16:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)