Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fringe science organizations
I don't agree that it's inherently OR to characterize organizations that are widely acknowledged to be outside of the mainstream as fringe, and I don't think the word is necessarily pejorative either. Don't agree there are no sources to verify these organizations as fringe. Here's an article in LiveScience (eliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_65#Is_LiveScience.com_a_reliable_source.3F|previously identified as a reliable source) that refers to it as "fringe": http://www.livescience.com/24310-flat-earth-belief.html. An article in the BBC characterizes them as "conspiratorial", which is synonymous with fringe in this instance: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7540427.stm. Without going through the rest, I'm guessing other organizations have similar articles on them. However, this page lends itself much more to a list rather than an article, since that would require synthesis
— User:Mikeman67, 14:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:R (Wikipedia:Redirect)