Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of works with the subtitle "Virtue Rewarded"
per the rationales of most of those who commented at the previous two AFD's (which for some reason aren't weren't mentioned here (they are now)). I wish it was still 2004, when all the quirkiness hadn't been relentlessly sucked out of the place, and a bunch of smart and witty and clever people (I even saw Geogre's name in the history, which brought a brief smile to my face) could create something for the sheer joy of creating it.  I know, I know, even Bish has never supported keeping it.  I know, I know,   and  and |WP:NOFUNALLOWED and lots of other bluelinks. I know, I know, we are an ever so much more serious encyclopedia than we were back then.  I know, I know, this is going to get deleted this time.  But when sociologists of the future study the rapid loss of fun and joy and personality in Wikipedia between around 2007 and 2020, I hope they note that, although the drop in support for this article between the AFD of 2007 and this one was stark, there was still one lone holdout even in darkest 2020
— User:Floquenbeam, 01:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)