Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle Finger Protests (2nd nomination)
Per {{u|Rathfelder}}.  Nom's dismissive analysis of sources is not convincing.  {{u|LikeMeercats}}'s argument is especially not convincing per .  And the use of  is particularly off base.  That the org's POV is cited in articles on matters being protested is precisely an indicator of notability for such a group.  Finally, regardless of the "spacing issues and the like" we don't delete articles for being written by "somebody unfamiliar with Wikipedia." Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
— [[User talk:192.160.216.52|talk]]), 14:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PAPER||WP:INHERITED (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)