Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stev´nn Hall
The only source that is of any use for notability is the Globe and Mail review, and that's just a short review amongst several others. Perhaps the creators.vice.com link is useful, but I can't personally |verify that. The Thomas Waugh essay (https://books.google.ca/books?id=UQnaAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT261&dq=%22Stev%C2%B4nn+Hall%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiMrdaymJ_cAhWCyIMKHRQ0DJ4Q6AEILzAB#v=onepage&q=%22Stev%C2%B4nn%20Hall%22%20-wikipedia&f=false google books link here) only mentions him in a screen grab and caption. The article's claim that his "satyrical short film 'Bondage Television' deserved broad commentary by the film writer Thomas Waugh in the context of masculine sexual orientation" is not backed up by the cited text itself (nor does it make much sense as a sentence -- Hall's short film deserved more "broad commentary" ''by'' "the film writer Thomas Waugh"? Or is Waugh claiming it deserves more broad commentary in general?) Either way, it doesn't seem to appear in the cited text and cannot be verified. If the original author of this Wikipedia article is making some sort of claim about what Waugh has or has not done as a scholar on behalf of Hall, that would be |original research and a POV issue. Further searching turns up very little, a few mentions that only confirm Hall as an artist, but nothing that supports  (or  for that matter
— User:Freshacconci, 18:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:OR||WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Verifiability)