Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture (second nomination)
because Wikipedia is #DIR|not a directory of loosely-associated entries.  The article fails to make any claim of E|notability through ''|independent, secondary sources'' to reflect the phenomenon's impact in popular culture.  The information is not |verifiable in providing any real-world context about each occurrence.  "1989 - In the comic strip Dilbert, Dogbert tells Dilbert that his poem would take 'three monkeys, ten minutes'." ''So what?''  What does this provide in an encyclopedic sense?  Look at this http://skylla.wz-berlin.de/pdf/2002/ii02-101.pdf PDF that I found: "The Internet is home to a vast assortment of quotations and experimental designs concerning monkeys and typewriters. They all expand on the theory often attributed to Henri Poincaré which contends that if an infinite number of monkeys were left to bang on an infinite number of typewriters, sooner or later they would accidentally reproduce the complete works of William Shakespeare (or even just one of his sonnets)."  ''This'' is the kind of content that needs to reflect this subject, and depending on how much of this significant coverage of the topic is available, the content should be included at Infinite monkey theorem until it needs to be spun off per .  Listing random mentions is just not encyclopedic, and there needs to be real-world context behind it to qualify for Wikipedia
— User:Erik, 15:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:SS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)