Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is (novel)
First off,  is not a valid argument. Neither is . We don't keep books because it could potentially be helpful in one format or another to someone. You have to show that the book is notable by showing links to reliable sources. This leads me to the next point: Babbleabout Children's Books is not a reliable source. It's a book blog. It might be a bit bigger than some of the other blogs out there, but essentially it's a non-notable book blog and isn't usable to show notability for the book. Even if it was, it's one book review and we need multiple independent and reliable sources that talk about the book in-depth. So far there are no sources out there for this book  to show that it even slightly passes 
— User:Tokyogirl79, 08:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOHARM||WP:ITSUSEFUL||WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)