Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magdalen Berns (2nd nomination)
I have no opinion on the retention of this article. I do have an opinion on the quality of some of the arguments put forward. It is important to make comments based upon Wikipedia policy, not on  or on . When this is closed it will be closed based upon the '''policy based arguments''' put forward by all who express an opinion. Personal strongly held opinions either way are not relevant, however valid, important, they are in the real world. Here we are only concerned with |notability and |verification/verifiability. Either Berns passes or she fails. Those new to Wikipedia who have, perhaps, come here from the twitter announcement, should try, please, to understand how discussions are held here
— User:Timtrent, 12:42, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)