Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muten Roshi
Once again this applies, to your problem with sources. From  "Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is encouraged: this is "source-based research," and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia." Also from  "Examples of primary sources include... ...scripts, screenplays, novels, motion pictures, videos, and television programs." Finally also from  Secondary sources are only required when interpretation of the primary source was required. Editors seem to misuse the OR policy to get things deleted. OR should be renamed to Original Idea's or Original concepts, since that is what it blocks. This article does not present original thought, it is all verifiable through primary sources. This nominators use of colored boxes in his nominations is very unnecessary, and rude. Finally, saying that real world sources do not exist is completely insane
— User:Viperix, 01:50, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:OR||WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)