Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Wilson
Sorry, we judge on the merits of a person's body of work, of which there are plenty of sources listed, not the fact they have won awards or had films made about their work (most writers do not enter the business aiming for that goal). This reads like a |nomination made to make a point by a |single purpose account which has a rationale which is too long to be understood, much less can have the reasoning for deletion found within it. Article has long existed before her relationship was revealed, thus the NH rationale is invalidated, and nominator cites policies such as WP:CORP and WP:MUSIC which do not apply to the subject at all, and needs to learn to link to the proper rationales, as |the Wikipedia Soap Opera Project doesn't apply here either
— User:Mrschimpf, 11:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:SPA||WP:SOAPS (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)