Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin Andresen (2nd nomination)
with Bitcoin -  applies, and while there are sources, they fail GNG because they are not independent of the subject, and possibly not neutral, either.  The technology may be notable (and I'm skeptical of that because it only has market penetration in very specific areas; it's still very much a fad) but notability is not inherited.  If everything Andresen is mentioned in is Bitcoin-related, than it's really about Bitcoin, not about Andresen as a biographical subject.  Note that  guidelines are very different than people seem to think - interviews with a subject published in a newspaper are reliable, but as the majority of the info is coming from the subject directly, reliability is questionable (Andrew W.K. is a good example of what can happen there), and most certainly the sources are not independent of the subject
— User:MSJapan, 21:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)