Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Derk
While  calls for quality sources, I object to those who equate quality with quantity. That the policy cites the New York Times as an example is pretty shameful at this point due to the number of ethical lapses reported about that particular publication over the last several years. Small, local papers are not to be dismissed as "unreliable" just because of their lower circulation numbers. We are supposed to look at editorial policies, standards, and the history of a particular publication in determining the reliability. Circulation has no correlation to those standards for the purpose of passing 
— User:JimMillerJr, 19:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)