Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer One
I've just been looking at the page as it was when it was nominated, and the page as it is now. It's definitely come a long way from one rather poor reference and a synopsis ripped from the official site to a more in-depth article with eight references. At this point, I don't think the question is whether or not it's verifiable or adequately sourced, it's about whether it's . So two things: first of all, all the |single-purpose accounts here need to realize that this is not about whether or not the show is good. Second, I think we can dispense with the lingering questions of verifiability. Pioneer One exists, lots of people downloaded it, and lots of people liked it. The only question I see remaining is, is that enough for notability? I believe it is
— User:Fletch, 04:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NN||WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Notability)