Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Park (2nd nomination)
or merge ''very'' selectively to Institute for Creation Research. Since the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Park|last AfD no |reliable, independent sources have been identified and I am unable to find any. Based on this I do not think that the topic meets the criteria for an independent article as set out in the |general notability guideline. The arguments for keeping the article presented at the last AfD appear to be weak, based on - so far unfounded - speculation that third party sourcing existed and unsupported claims of popularity
— User:Guest9999, 16:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NN (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)