Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles S. Herrman
Mr. Herrman's work here is a substantial, positive contribution to the Wikipedia in keeping with the spirit of its mission and principles.  The primary topics addressed in the article are surely notable. Those with serious interest in the primary topics addressed in this article would feel strange disputing their notability or significance.  (I don't see that this in dispute; perhaps I've missed or misread some of the discussion).  As for Mr. Herrman's own "notability" status I think he qualifies based on this criterion: otability (people) | "The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded."1 Notable in the sense of being "famous", or "popular"—although not irrelevant—is secondary."  (He seems notable enough among the 1100 or so scholars who have downloaded his work from SSRN, where he is among the top 10 most popular authors
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)