Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetris effect
Hate to be a downer here, but I don't see evidence of this Neologism's use or acceptance in language.  Needs reliable sourcing, the 4 given sources are inadequate.  The first "reference" is an abstract (I'm not willing to buy the full article), but it's called "tetris dreams"  and doesn't refer to anything as "the tetris effect" in the abstract, leading me to believe that it won't later on in the story.  The second reference (Wired, 2005) never uses the phrase "Tetris Effect" either.  The external links:  Scientific American article doesn't say "Tetris Effect" anywhere.  The only one of these 4 supposed sources that uses the phrase "Tetris Effect" is the Wired 1994 external link, hardly current and definitely not establishing .  The phrase only appears once and in no way is doing so as establishing that "Tetris effect" is something even coined.   The only GHit I got making heavy mention of "tetris effect" was http://www.citypaper.net/articles/032196/article038.shtml this one, but I'm not sure of the sources reliability
— User:Keeper76, 19:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)