Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVN Award for Best New Starlet
per |DEL8 as clearly failing |GNG, the relevant notability guideline. Feigned shock, polemics about deletionists and anti-sex bias, and inept comparisons to notable awards notwithstanding, there is simply no significant coverage of this subject in independent, plausibly-reliable sources. (''Good Morning America'' 's description of the award as "coveted" is not significant coverage by any stretch of the imagination.) Also, there is nothing wrong with the article's use of primary sources: the problem is that primary sources do not count towards establishing notability. ''See'' . I strongly suggest that the retention proponents make some minimal effort to locate independent sources that do more than mention the award in passing, as the existing votes are unconvincing. ''Cf.''  ("Once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface
— User:Rebbing, 19:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DEL8||WP:GNG||WP:NRVE||WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)