Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etail Conferences
as unambiguous . Remember that the  policy specifically says {{tq|Wikipedia articles about a company or organization are not an extension of their website or other social media marketing efforts.}}. The brand new editor's first edits were to the fairly obscure MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist page in an effort to get a known brand spammer removed from the blacklist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist#Worldwide_Business_Research. This has happened before, when another SPA tried to get the spammer added to the whitelist while editing this specific article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JoeGranata. That's the context here: blocked spammers, and SPAs pushing this conference. The content of the page shows that the company does not meet , as the cited sources are mostly not about the subject, or are from trade journals deriving their content from company-provided material. For example, the Forbes Thau source is about Wal-Mart, and only contains a quote from an eTail employee. Put another way, the coverage is either not significant or not independent. So, delete according to policy, or delete according to guidelines. Either way the result is the same
— User:Bakazaka, 18:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROMO||WP:NOT||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)