Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MagicView
as non-notable software add-on, unless reliable, independent sources can be found. I've had a go, but a determined http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22MagicView%22+Ecco&start=20&sa=N Google search doesn't bring back anything that near half-way fulfills the |criteria. Whilst comparisons |are not to be encouraged in deletion discussions (and despite the fact that using Google to prove a point is, well, |dodgy), I think that comparing that search to http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Word+Viewer%22+Microsoft&start=90&sa=N this one should give those likening this software to MS Word Viewer considerable pause for thought. If this software becomes as widely-used and notable then sources should not be an issue. Until then, however, I don't think it warrants an article
— User:Onebravemonkey, 15:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:GOOGLE (Wikipedia:Notability)