Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race and crime
This is undoubtedly a valid article topic, although I don't think lumping together statistics from various countries (not to mention continents) was a good idea.  The nom provides 7 reasons to delete, one of which (not encyclopedic) is overly vague.  3 others are obviously inaccurate descriptions of the article (not factual, lack of context, lack of verification).  That leaves: POV (inclusive of "misleading"), original research, and attack page.  This is not a blatant attack page, so that can be dropped as well.  The fact that sources exist in most cases, inclusive of this one, means this is not original research (perhaps incomplete research).  There is no "unique synthesis"--it's simply a poorly- or insufficiently-performed synthesis.  That leaves only POV, which I have never before supported as a reason to delete an article.  This time, I will |make an exception.  This article was clearly created with a POV agenda (for instance, it doesn't even mention that perceived racial effects are significantly reduced after controlling for socioeconomic status).  There are more than enough available reliable sources about the relationship between race and crime (government records and scholarly articles) to write a good article but no effort was made to incorporate them
— User:Black, 21:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)