Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Roanoke Obama campaign speech
I don't believe  applies in this case.  If editors are saying the article is biased, the obvious solution is to fix the bias.  If the case is that the article is mostly about the reactions to the speech rather than the speech content itself, that's pretty common; look at Reagan's Neshoba County Fair "states' rights" speech (where almost the entire article is about the reception to the speech - and correctly so IMHO) as an example.  Speeches are measured by their impact.  If the speech didn't have much of a reaction, then it wouldn't be notable.  Whether the reaction is negative or positive is not relevant when judging notability
— User:Mr, 03:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)