Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teen pornography (2nd nomination)
Looks pretty well referenced now. I know this is , but do you really think that panda pornography (or any other pornographic sub-genre) is more worthy of a Wikipedia article than teen pornography? I know that 'teen porn' is a vague and subjectively defined sub-genre of porn (not all of the performers are teens - and some pornography featuring teenagers doesn't live up to the stereotypes that so-called 'teen' pornography portrays), and that this has the strong potential to be a magnet for original research, but it does have seven different sources
— User:HisSpaceResearch, 01:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WAX (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)