Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David L. Leamon
The article has expanded some and accumulated citations since being brought to AFD.  The references are from two newspapers, but the set from one newspaper are not accessible, which is why I append ''Weak'' to my support.  Assuming Good Faith, I would say that the subject passes the first  criterion of being the subject of multiple secondary sources (I count the 6 articles being from 2 secondary sources in this case - which is why  is needed).  Having a part of a building named after you satisfies (weakly) satisfies a second of the  criteria - receiving a significant recognized honor; people seek out having wings of buildings and rooms named after them as persistent marks of their influence. --User:Ceyockey
— [[User talk:Ceyockey|talk to me]]''), 00:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Notability)