Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (4th nomination)
It has been argued that it does not meet the threshold of otability. Per , {{tq|One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed ''as a group or set'' by independent reliable sources}}. Several sources have been linked above demonstrating that this is the case for the topic of common misconceptions; https://www.businessinsider.com/mythbusting-common-misconceptions-2014-11 here is another for good measure. It has also been argued that there aren't clear and well-defined  and that the list is hence . I don't personally agree that this is the case, and even if I did that's not a reason to delete the page without at least making an attempt to fix the criteria first (since the topic is notable – if the topic itself were not notable, changing the inclusion criteria to redefine the scope to something that ''is'' notable I would consider a much more dubious proposition, and I might favour deletion in such a case). It has further been argued that the sourcing is poor, that certain entries don't belong, that some entries that should be on the list are missing, and that the inclusion criteria are insufficiently enforced; these are all  problems that can (and should) be solved by regular editing, not reasons to delete the page outright. Considering I don't see any reasons for deletion that I think hold water, I am of the opinion that the page should be kept. I would however not be opposed to splitting the page into subarticles
— User:TompaDompa, 13:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:LISTN||WP:LISTCRITERIA||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:SURMOUNTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)