Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moneysavingexpert.com (2nd nomination)
It seems to meet  on many counts.  Let me declare an interest though, I came to Wiki after reading one of Martin Lewis's blogs recently and am a regular user and fan of the site, which is a huge vast resource of help to many people; and widely acclaimed as such in the UK.  It's interesting to compare it to similar UK money sites.  We have an entry for Moneysupermarket (Alexa rank 5414 compared to MoneySavingExpert 3083) and even Housepricecrash (Alexa rank 15,000).  This site even has a motion in the UK House of Commons supporting its work.  As for the finances, I've just been reading through it and can't see any conflict. Having read the linked source on the subject it seemed clear to me that this site is 'ethical stance with the principles of being free to use with no advertisements3, independent, unbiased and journalistic in all its research and money-saving articles' whilst at the same time commercial (as noted in the info box).  Perhaps its also worth us all having perspective we're on Wiki, this article can be changed and amended we're really talking about whether the entry is worthy and its clear to me it is. Paul  —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by
— User:80, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)