Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cousin White Paper: Aching Mature Lewdness
Pink film is notable, many specific pink films are notable, I accept the award as apparently notable, and I appreciate that there are articles on them.  I'd like to see more thorough coverage of pornography on Wikipedia.  This specific film is not WP-notable, however.  The film is lacking the sort of |significant coverage from |Reliable sources and consequent |verifiability one would want for an encyclopedia article.  Instead of prose following the topics in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (film) there are bare statements of fact as to having gotten the award, the cast, crew, and a brief plot outline, essentially  apart from a short lede.  If that's all that can be written, then that's a problem.  Merely winning an award is ''not'' a guarantee a film is notable by WP's standards Wikipedia:Notability (films), only a general indicator it ''might'' be if there are RS for things other than the mere fact of winning the award.  It's the existence of RS treating the film as the subject at length that is the measure of WP-notability.  This film could be better treated in a list of films that won the award, if that
— User:Шизомби, 18:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:PLOTONLY (Wikipedia:Notability)