Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Eggar
for now): Evidence the subject passes  #1, possibly #4, #5, #6, possibly #7, certainly #8, and possibly #10. I would like to find more independent and non-promotional sources but we should not determine against stand alone status when search results may be biased. I was "almost" persuaded by {{u|Atlantic306}} to !vote delete, because a "week keep" on rumors is not compelling, but three Grammy's are. The current poor shape of the article is not a determining factor but a |promotional tone is evident. This is not detrimental as it can be resolved by editing. '''See comments below
— User:Otr500, 10:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NMUSIC||WP:NOTPROMO (Wikipedia:Notability)