Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Reformed Baptist Churches of America
But  assumes some sort of reasoned analysis as to ''why'' particular policy or guidelines should be disregarded (the reason "a rule prevents you from improving" WP). "Clearly encyclopedic" beg the question|begs the question and is not such a reason (might as well say "keep it just because" or "useful"). Nobody has explained why denominations should be per se notable regardless of coverage or why we should have WP articles about any org with such scant coverage. And a majority vote () isn't sufficient for an IAR jusitification either. Now, at least some have argued this particular org meets , but for reasons given above I don't think so and that ignores the lack of substantial coverage in any case
— User:Novaseminary, 04:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:NOTAVOTE||WP:NONPROFIT (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)