Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flipora
The malware factor is irrelevant unless it gained further coverage for being discovered to be malware. It has had several paragraphs dedicated to it from Forbes in multiple articles, Huffington Post gave it a reasonably sized paragraph, and The Hindu dedicated a lengthy article to it. Sorry guys, but it clearly satisfies GNG, and |you not liking it does not change that. There's also a lengthy piece by http://www.pcworld.com/article/2365362/fliporas-stumbleupon-rival-now-senses-your-mood.html PC World, for example. Notability is not temporary, and we have a whole year of it getting coverage from just the sources in the article - one of which was published less than a month ago
— User:Lukeno94, 00:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)