Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of redundant expressions (2nd nomination)
Violates numerous policies such as Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary|no language guides, |no trivia and Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory|no repositories. I think arguing about sourcing is irrelevent, this is after all a list of facts, or can be. But we have more than enough encyclopoedic coverage of this topic at Pleonasm and Redundancy (language), with examples. I like the analogy above to List of jokes which would be similar in terms of interpretation and scope, but of course, |other stuff doesnt exist is no defence
— User:MickMacNee, 14:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TRIVIA||WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)