Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frozen Tide
This is a perfectly straightforward issue; collegiate inter- or intramural teams have not been held to be presumptively notable.  The GNG takes no notice of how many people attend their games, whether their players have or have not played professional hockey, whether or not the particular articles are WIP, the number of trucks nationwide which sport team bumper stickers, the industriousness of local hockey bloggers or the number of years Wikipedia editors claim to have worked in law offices (in which, at 17 years and counting, I should be ahead of the curve).  Certainly someone familiar with the legal field must understand that the best way to meet a guideline is to meet it, rather than argue why failing to do so ought to be credited nonetheless as a success.  We would of course pass any club team which did meet the GNG by having multiple reliable, independent sources report upon them in "significant detail" (not counting sports scores and match writeups discouraged by ).  Do you have any articles from the ''Birmingham Press'' or ''The Hockey News'' to cite
— User:Ravenswing, 18:39, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)