Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halvad railway station
WP:CONSENSUS|Consensus, which is the primary deciding policy, wisely decided long ago that all rail stations are notable.  This way thousands of editors don't waste time and energy fleshing out and debating the retention of articles on the tens of thousands of stations when editors efforts are much better spent on creating new articles and improving existing ones.  For this and most stations, it's impossible for in depth coverage like extensive government reports and budgets to not exist.  An article for such a station serving a town of over 60,000 (which this one does) in the UK or US would never even be considered for deletion even if there was zero coverage in the article.  Is this a case of |systemic bias
— User:Oakshade, 05:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)