Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Joseph Cormier 3
The opinion of the subject here is moot; there is a sizable number of reliable sources.  Many of them are 30 years old, and appear to be print-only, but they still exist.  The article itself has improved some since the last time it has been nominated, but overall it has been a terrible -magnet for its own subject, and still suffers from a lack of outside attention from people who are uninvolved with the subject.  That, however, is a cleanup issue, there is nothing with the ''tone'' of the article that cannot be cleaned up.  The sources exist, so the subject is likely notable.  In the interest of full disclosure, I was invited here by DoDaCanaDa
— User:Jayron32, 16:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)