Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Iorio (2nd nomination)
Lucas, I quote directly from : "If an academic/professor meets ''any'' '''''one''''' of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, they are notable. If an academic/professor meets none of these conditions, they ''may still'' be notable, if they meet the conditions of otability or other notability criteria, and the merits of an article on the academic/professor will depend largely on the extent to which it is verifiable. '''Before applying these criteria, see the detailed Notes which follow'''. 1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." As I am trying to let all of you here understand, point 1. is met from NASA ADS, which is the database which is appropriate to this case, given the field of activity of Iorio. Then, please read carefully also otability and the criteria inside. They are met by the media coverage. Since Iorio has been compared here to other common scientists, many of them have their own articles here, please note that very few have this media coverage. Anyway, again, here we are not a scientific commettee deciding if hiring Iorio or not. We are evaluating an article for its content and according to to the wiki criteria. Please, also look at the ''CONTENT'' of the previous discussion about the recreation of the article, which Bgwhite claims to be happened under (''false pretences''-why? On which bases you say that
— User:Megalobingosaurus, 10:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)