Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Base load theory
This is a very notable subject that is widely discussed. The nominator only gives reasons for editing, not deletion. How can you say "nothing appears worth salvaging" when the article contains loads of well sourced factual information about the subject. The only problem is with the way some of it is presented. And the article's purpose is ''not'' to counter any claims. That may have been the purpose of the original creator, but that editor does not |own the article so does not have the right to define its purpose. As with any Wikipedia article this one's purpose is to present |neutral, |verifiable information on a |notable subject. That purpose can't be fulfilled by deleting the article, only by editing it
— User:Phil, 11:01, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OWN||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:N (Wikipedia:Ownership of content)