Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unidan (2nd nomination)
Once notable, always notable. . There is no such thing as "temporary notability". Taking such an idea to its logical extension, we would be deleting articles on Ramses II or Sweyn Forkbeard. They haven't been up to much lately, have they? Or when was the last time you heard about the Balloon Boy hoax? Yet we keep the article because it was once notable and, so, is always notable. Currently, on average over 100 people view the Unidan article every day, so clearly it continues to be useful to a number of people. Frankly, the fact that the only activity the account that proposed this deletion has had is nominating the page for deletion, yet it clearly has a knowledge of past discussions, leads me to believe that this may be Ben Eisenkop himself attempting to have this page deleted because of the unflattering information that it contains about his conduct. Creating alternate accounts for shady purposes is the entire point of his scandal, after all
— User:AlphabeticThing9, 03:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTTEMPORARY (Wikipedia:Notability)