Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weak dematerialization (Shroud of Turin)
Per talk page, looks like a |bad-faith nomination. I think ing takes place here to affirm the sole notion on Shroud, while there is no scientific consensus on image origin as showed in the Shroud of Turin.  I’ve provided some critical insight, but not a single scientific source, indicating WD’s flaws, has been provided by opponents .  The whole lynching-like action seems to be a shifting to some obscure view of the image origin, not currently tested. The article demonstrates that the theory '''has''' a following within the scientific community as per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Alternative_theoretical_formulations|alternative theoretical formulations, passed in Arbcom’s pseudoscience request
— User:Brandmeister, 14:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)