Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Crone (politician)
While Liverpool is certainly a large enough city that a councillor ''would'' be deemed to pass  #2 if he could be sourced as passing the "who have received significant press coverage" part of the equation, the sourcing ''here'' isn't showing that at all. The article is based mostly on |primary sources rather than |reliable ones, and of the two sources that ''do'' represent media coverage, one just namechecks his existence in an article whose ''core'' subject is the ''party'' rather than ''him'', and the one that ''is'' substantively about ''him'' is only just barely long enough to escape being dismissed as a ''blurb''. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do ''better'' than this, but this is ''not'' the depth or volume of sourcing that it takes to make a city councillor notable for being a city councillor
— User:Bearcat, 17:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)