Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul (2nd nomination)
per long-established consensus against merging, demonstrated at this article, Ron Paul, and the prior AFD. Arguments presented by nom are , , and . The other argument is : a comment in this style sounds like it has the potential to hint at an argument through an implicit fallacy which would be a grey area (it speaks for itself). What qualifies as ungood and why? . Further, nom has not attempted ''any'' of the deletion alternatives recommended prior to AFD: editing, discussing, or proposing merge (which is not done by AFD); nom has only added tags and failed to respond to an offer to discuss: see Talk:Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul|talk. FYI, similar articles exist for Senate_career_of_Hillary_Rodham_Clinton|Clinton, Governorship of Mitt Romney|Romney, Mayoralty of Rudy Giuliani|Giuliani, and Sponsorship of legislation by John Kerry|Kerry
— User:John, 18:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:NOGOOD||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:SOFIXIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)