Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fjordman (3rd nomination)
If sufficient independent, third-party coverage for Fjordman can be found, then an article on Fjordman will be fine. At that point, the article can also reflect primarily what the reliable sources say, instead of serving as a soapbox for Fjordman and as a |linkfarm for Fjordman's and other right-wing blogs.&nbsp;&nbsp
— User:Cs32en, 18:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LINKFARM (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)