Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siegfried Hansen (photographer)
No valid argument clearly supplied for deletion. One argument can, however, be inferred: "Over on de:WP, Hansen was judged not to merit an encyclopedia entry (and not merely an entry in German), QED." I've read Google's English quasi-translation of the discussion, and it's not so garbled that I can't get the gist of it. I'm not convinced. A lot of it is along the lines of: "He's less notable than are various unspecified photographers whose articles have been deleted." Even if this were true, it would be invalid here: see rguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Well, is he notable? There are chapters devoted to him in books from publishers of some merit; therefore yes he is notable
— User:Hoary, 05:17, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A (Wikipedia:Attribution)