Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East coast liberal
to Modern Liberalism in the United States; If we look at what searches bring up, one will see that NEO does not apply, the term has been in use since the 1970s (at least 2 examples of usage: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=KqlOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=sgkEAAAAIBAJ&dq=east-coast-liberal&pg=7247%2C1697043 1, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rNtUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zZADAAAAIBAJ&dq=east-coast-liberal&pg=2008%2C4138723 2). So the question remains, is the subject |notable? Lets look at what the searches bring up: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22East+coast+liberal%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 News, https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22East+coast+liberal%22 books, and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22east+coast+liberal%22&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp= scholar. From What I can tell, the subject is used as an adjective for the past several decades, but the usage has appeared to increase since the turn of the century. It is my opinion that if one were to add up all the content the the subject clearly passes ; that being said, if summarized down, worded for neutrality, and cited by the available |reliable sources that this can be brought down to two or three well cited paragraphs. This content IMHO belongs in the article Modern Liberalism in the United States, where it can be its own section. If that article meets the size as described by , this subject (or another subject) can be spunout
— User:RightCowLeftCoast, 23:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NN||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:LIMIT (Wikipedia:Notability)