Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pheromone Recordings
to MapleCore. Full disclosure, I'm the original creator here, but I did so at a very different time in the history of Wikipedia's notability and sourcing standards. At the time, all a record label had to do to be considered notable per  was to have notable artists on it — and  wasn't a thing yet either, but rather it was enough to be able to reference it to RS coverage of the ''artists'' which verified that those artists were on it. But we're stricter now about the distinction between coverage which mentions the topic and coverage which is actually ''about'' the topic, and this isn't salvageable to the latter sort of coverage. But even without the depth of coverage needed to qualify for a standalone article, it is verifiable enough to merit ''mention'' in Wikipedia somewhere — and its parent corporation's article is better-sourced as the subject of more coverage about it than this division is
— User:Bearcat, 15:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NMUSIC||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)