Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hauke Harder
I reason as follows:The references supplied between them satisfy  (because it's shown that he exists and is a composer) and  (because he receives at least a passing mention in reliable sources; the first one I looked at, kiel.de, is clearly over the bar as a RS).It remains to be shown that Hauke Harder satisfies .  However,  trumps  because the former is a policy and the latter is a mere guideline.  This is why Uncle G wrote this: {{quote|''"Notability deals in subjects and topics, not content.  That a subject is non-notable does not mean that verifiable information about a subject should be excluded from Wikipedia. It means that the subject is not an appropriate one for an article
— User:Uncle_G, 11:46, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:PRESERVE||WP:N (Wikipedia:Verifiability)