Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Schlund (3rd nomination)
completely fails  (including  and , depending on where you stick him) and . He does not have any real significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, including as noted above in the evaluation of those found. Only a few minor mentions in a few reliable sources. Bulk of the article comes from his own site (not third party) and IMDB (not . He has also not "made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment", no evidence of a large fan base (as in evidenced by those pesky reliable sources, etc etc. Can't believe this actually survived the previous AfDs. I see no valid reason to redirect this to jetpack either. He neither invented it nor is a significant person in relation to it. It just, apparently, uses it
— User:AnmaFinotera, 04:14, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:ATH||WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)