Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandria’s Genesis
There are no |reliable sources that treat the hoax or even mention it (and of course there isn't any treating it as an actual condition). A large amount of unreliable sources does sometimes prejudice me towards keeping, but this one is not that large if you look closely, and the repetition of content (and lack-there-of) is consistent throughout the reports and it corresponds to the first stage of the hoax. No measure was reportedly sought or proposed against the "condition", and it seems to have vanished without hitting the mainstream media jackpot. The only reason I can think of (and it is most certainly ''not'' guideline based by any means) is that I feel it is a fair service to record and report the situation as a hoax (and I agree with Dantai Amakiir that the fact that no respected sources make comment reinforces the need for comment). The matter with doing that is not notability but verifiability, as there seems to be no pertinent authority ''denying'' it, so we have no one to quote, and it would mostly depend on how much of the fact that it is a hoax is actually a matter of fact. But even then an article would be too much. Is there a List of Internet Hoaxes or something for a redirect
— User:Patitomr, 22:19, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)