Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Asiedu (2nd nomination)
I disagree with the nominator's assessment of the sources. Gulf African review is not a trivial mention, there's whole paragraphs about him in the article. TV3 is also a more than trivial mention; there are whole paragraphs about him in that article as well. Those two combine to pass WP:GNG.  Also, per , only being available on LinkedIn Pulse is not in an of itself a reason to say that the sources are unreliable.  Sources don't even have to be online to be reliable!   I would also caution the nominator for seemingly using notability, verifiability and reliability seemingly interchangeably.  To a certain extent, what is in the ''article'' isn't entirely relevant to whether the article passes GNG or not; what is relevant is what is in the ''sources'', and what type of sources those are.  Also, in his claim about AfC, the nominator fails to note that the article was reviewed and accepted by an AfC reviewer (me) prior to being mainspaced
— User:Purplebackpack89, 21:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PAYWALL (Wikipedia:Verifiability)