Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual deaths (5th nomination)
most of the concerns in the nomination are simply not valid reasons for deletion.  is an essay, and even if the list is biased towards recent deaths that's not a valid reason to delete it. If the article is primarily sourced to unreliable sources that is likewise not a reason to delete it, unless there are no reliable sources on the topic at all. Yes, deciding what constitutes an "unusual death" has a large element of subjectivity, but we can largely avoid problems by pushing the determination of "unusual" to the sources, in a similar way to List of films considered the best. It is clear that there are a very large number of sources listing people who have died in unusual circumstances, and I should point out that most of the sources cited by this page report the circumstances of the person's death because it is considered to be unusual
— User:Hut, 19:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RECENT (Wikipedia:Recentism)