Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Douglas (cameraman) (2nd nomination)
Besides the very high amount of in-depth coverage soon after his death including some extremely in-depth stories http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/06/13/eveningnews/main1709477.shtmlhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/british-journalists-killed-in-iraq-480248.html, years later, in 2007 and 2011 are examples I've found after a quick search, still received significant coverage. http://books.google.com/books?id=i0TpPYAZFS0C&pg=PA191&dq=%22Paul+Douglas%22+iraq&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wp0VUY3bHKXgiwKonoGIDA&ved=0CDoQ6AEwBzgK#v=onepage&q=%22Paul%20Douglas%22%20iraq&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=adGiti6UeCcC&pg=PA72&dq=%22Paul+Douglas%22+iraq&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wp0VUY3bHKXgiwKonoGIDA&ved=0CCEQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=%22Paul%20Douglas%22%20iraq&f=false   is for individuals who have not received in-depth coverage but simply related to those who have.   doesn't care ''why'' someone is notable, but ''if'' someone is notable
— User:Oakshade, 01:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)