Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethel Lang (supercentenarian)
This person definitely belongs on the lists where she appears (although five lists on this topic, as indicated under the "See also" heading, does seem a bit excessive.) But there's nothing in this article that's particularly notable. Simply living a long time is not |notable as that term is defined on Wikipedia; the only coverage in |reliable sources is news items about successive birthdays and an obit. OPAGE. Also, nearly half of the article is filled with either information about |her non-notable relatives and their ages or information about other "title-holders" and which "record-setters" succeeded which for each mythical "title". This is the stuff of trivia contests and hobbyist websites, not an encyclopedia. Human longevity is an important, encyclopedic topic. But not every long-lived person is notable simply because of their long life
— User:David, 15:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS||WP:NOPAGE||WP:INHERIT (Wikipedia:Notability)