Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Gray
obviously without prejudice against recreation in November if she wins. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being election candidates per se — the notability test at  is ''holding'' a notable political office, not just running for one, and being a clearing house for information about current candidates is not our job. To already warrant an article today, she would have to demonstrate that either (a) she already had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten her an article independently of her candidacy (the Cynthia Nixon test), or (b) she could be referenced to such an ''unusual'' depth, range and volume of press coverage that her candidacy could be credibly claimed as ''much more special'' than everybody else's candidacies in some way that would pass the |ten year test for enduring significance (the Christine O'Donnell test). As for the fundraising claim, the source for that states ''only'' that she's the top fundraiser in the ''2020'' cycle, and does ''not'' claim that she has set the all-time fundraising record over the ''entire'' history of the office — so that doesn't pass the O'Donnell test. Obviously she'll get an article if she wins, since her notability claim will have changed from "candidate" to "officeholder", but nothing here is valid grounds for a Wikipedia article about her to already exist today
— User:Bearcat, 13:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Notability)