Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip pop
per : 'To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, '''not books and papers that use the term'''.' and 'Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources ''are not yet ready'' for use and coverage in Wikipedia.' I've looked through all the above canvassed drivel for something resembling a cogent argument this article should stay but I'm not finding it. A dump of sources from Google Books does not meet the criteria
— User:Rushyo, 21:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)