Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I. Kudigame
this is clearly allowed by , if you disagree with that you should take it up at the discussion page (where an active discussion is under way where I agree with the nominator's basic point).  Procedurally, a consensus can't over-turn the 5 pillars or the 3 core content policies. However, otability isn't any of these.  With a lack of content, POV and OR are trivially met, and the existing sources are sufficient for .  As far as  is concerned, this clearly qualifies as valid content for a specialized almanac
— User:power, 22:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRIN||WP:N||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:5P1 (Wikipedia:Notability)