Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milo's Astro Lanes
I was the prod remover, FWIW. The reviews in question are http://uk.ign64.ign.com/articles/152/152295p1.html IGN and http://uk.gamespot.com/milos-astro-lanes/reviews/milos-astro-lanes-review-2543683/ GameSpot. I don't see how these are primary sources, being external to the game's publishers and reviewing the game in a once removed fashion described by . Could you be more specific as to how these are primary as opposed to secondary sources please Indrian
— User:Someone, 22:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:No original research)