Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogrammer
or secondly '''Merge''' (per Borock and others)''':''' In my personal opinion I think this term is more worthy of Urban Dictionary than an Encyclopedia. That aside, "Brogrammer" is a combination of "bro" and "programmer", the first of the two being slang itself. Now the sources used for the article use the word in quotes or describe it in some other fashion as not to confuse it with a proper word and to identify it as slang. I question it's notability in the sense that the term may not be widely used or continue to be relevant at all in the future, sort of along the lines of . http://gizmodo.com/5910824/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-brogrammer There's No Such Thing as a Brogrammer I tend to agree with this source which is actually used in the article. One of the other sources is sort of a mock up encyclopedia from a computer magazine. The rest seem to be sources about sexism within jobs in computer related industries. These sources use the term in quotes as slang, and there are no mainstream media sources or any source using it as a standalone term without explanation. So while this term may be warrant a mention in a feminism article about sexism or perhaps a short description in computer related article, I do not think it's valid enough to require it's own article. At the very least this article title should be followed with "(slang)" such as Cornhole (slang) and Redskin (slang) have
— User:Lightgodsy, 19:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)