Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shiny Diamonds controversy
a non-notable "controversy" about a non-notable band'' and ''back-door attempt to get mention... into WP'' pretty much sums it up. In the end, one article in the paper does not meet the "multiple, non-trivial" aspect of ... indeed, it is just one example provided, and is not the subject of the article. In the end, it is |self-referential and unencyclopedic. And the solution for a deleted article is , not to create another article that is indirectly about it. Rather than generating a stink about it in the Post (was it even in the print version, or just online?), might I suggest the band focus its energy on meeting 
— User:Kinu, 06:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:ASR||WP:DRV||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)