Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Crowder (3rd nomination)
subject has received |significant coverage from multiple non-primary reliable sources, however most of those are about a single notable |event. Therefore, per  the article should be converted to a redirect to an article about the event. Like Sandra Fluke, if the subject receives significant coverage for other events, the article can always be recreated. I understand that the subject has posted a lot of commentary work, and has been interviewed as well, but on those things they do not have him (the subject of this AfD) as the primary subject of the content. As a writer (or even reporter) it is my opinion that he is not yet notable per . As an actor it is my opinion that he is not yet notable per . It is |too soon for a stand alone article, he maybe independently notable outside of the event one day, maybe if he speaks at a national convention (that was what changed Fluke from a BLP1E individual to a independently notable biography subject), but not today
— User:RightCowLeftCoast, 00:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:EVENT||WP:BLP1E||WP:CREATIVE||WP:NACTOR||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)