Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirngulbai Misech
Eeeesh.  Without respect to the accusations flying around, the subject doesn't pass the GNG, pure and simple.  Of the various sources cited, all but one fail.  One of the Island Times cites, both of the FoxSportsPulse cites, the Saipan Tribune cite, the Oceania Sports cite, '''all''' of these very plainly fail under  -- these are typical meet coverage pieces, where the subject is mentioned only casually and fleetingly, mixed in with the results of numerous other swimmers.  The Pacific Games page is a simple table, and does not provide "significant coverage" to the subject at all: its information can certainly be used to verify facts, but it cannot be used to sustain notability.  I'm failing to find any mention of the subject at all on those reportersacademy cites, and if someone might be so kind as to point one out, I'd appreciate it.  The ''only'' cite that provides extensive non-routine coverage of the subject is this ''Island Times'' piece - http://www.islandtimes.us/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=496:misech-swimming-for-her-dream - but there's one small problem: what about this paper, with no prior mention on Wikipedia, does anyone claim meets standards for reliability, fact-checking and accuracy, and what evidence does anyone proffer to back such a claim up? (In the best case, that's only a single source.)As far as NSPORT and SPORTCRIT go (err, Lugnuts, they link to the same guideline, and I'm unsure how you arrived at the premise that they're separate), I think Lugnuts is being a bit disingenuous.  NSPORT sets out no explicit default guideline for all other sports not otherwise mentioned; there isn't one, and such athletes must meet the GNG ... which in fact ALL athletes must do nonetheless.  There ''is'' no explicit criteria covering swimmers or divers, and if there had been, Lugnuts, as you're implying here, you wouldn't have sought comment on creating one as you did in this diff, four days ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ANotability_%28sports%29&type=revision&diff=675287783&oldid=671576537.  As such, no presumptive notability can be claimed.Finally, to Ron's suggestion that there might be non-English language sources out there: as I expect everyone is well aware, it is not acceptable to speculate that such sources might possibly exist, and then expect such speculation is by itself a reason to retain an article.  One must ''demonstrate'' that they do, and this being a BLP, it's very firmly the case that inferences or conjectures on that count cannot be made
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']], 22:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)