Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regina Bateson
One well-cited review paper is a good sign for the future of her academic career, but is not enough by itself for #C1. A dissertation award and a best-paper award are also not enough for #C2; we need something that recognizes her accomplishments more broadly and isn't based only on student work. Her work in the foreign service and her run for congress are not enough for . And a Q&A in a small local paper (the only source published independently of her and her employers that our article lists) or other |routine newspaper coverage of her campaign http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article204779874.html http://www.auburnjournal.com/article/2/21/18/regina-bateson-eyes-south-placer-key-beating-congressman-tom-mcclintock http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-congress-democrats-mcclintock-20171119-story.html is not enough for . We can certainly revisit this case if her political campaign succeeds or she moves forward in her academic career, but for now a lot of things that don't individually add up to notability means no notability
— User:David, 20:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)