Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost ramp
since I am working at a computer that rejects cookies and therefore cannot sign in. The terms "ghost ramp" and "stub ramps" are synonymous and have been use long before there was an Internet (the definition can be found http://www.southeastroads.com/glossary.html here, for example, in addition to several travel books; the State of Washington uses the synonym http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/transit/ptr_newsletter/2006_october.pdf here). As far as  is concerned, those ghost ramps/stub ramps mentioned in the page that have external links most definitely do not constitute original research in the Wikipedia definition. This this the most liberal interpretation of  I've seen in my time with Wikipedia - if this interpretation is upheld, then 90 percent of the road articles (and 100% of those with current exit lists) violate the policy as well. Furthermore, if we are now defining neologisms as terms being used by only a certain segment of the population, we'd better be very well consistent in that interpretation... and delete about 99% of the technology articles - or anything dealing with a very specialized topic - as well. From this person's viewpoint, this is right on the edge of a bad faith nomination, particularly in light of over 150 external links and references in the article
— User:147, 19:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)