Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Government Gazette
this fails the secondary in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources needed to pass  and just having other extremely badly sourced articles on similar things isn't a good reason to keep it. I'd suggest doing AfDs on them also. Since they clearly fail . While I'm not a huge fan ofs arguments in general, I'm even less a fan of them when the "other stuff" doesn't even meet the notability guidelines. "lets keep this non-notable thing, because of these other non-notable things" is extremely weak reasoning IMO. What it should ultimately come down to is if the subject of the AfD passes  or not, and as things currently are this doesn't
— User:Adamant1, 01:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:OSE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)