Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the largest airports in the Former Yugoslavia
actually I can't see the point in any of the lists mentioned in this discussion, it all seems way to arbitrary to me -  states "Wikipedia should not be excessive listings of statistics". What is the purpose of comparing pasenger statistics for airports in two different countries? Why not have List of the busiest airports in Germanophone Europe, so we can compare Hamburg Airport with Graz Airport and St. Gallen-Altenrhein Airport? If I want to visit Sarajevo, I'd fly to Sarajevo, my choice of airport is not going to be influenced by how many other people are flying to Belgrade. Why is it limited to the former Yugoslavia; why not the whole Balkans? Maybe it's more convenient for someone who wants to visit Serbia to fly in to Sofia. Dragging in the other examples used as justification for keeping this one; why compare passenger traffic at an airport in Iceland to one in Finland? That makes as much sense as grouping Australian and NZ airports - NZ is three hours' flying time from Sydney and Melbourne, let alone Adelaide and Perth. SAS is not common to all the countries in the Nordic list either, it does not operate domestically in Finland, Iceland or Greenland. If the decision is to keep, then the page needs to be moved to "busiest" airports, as "largest" is misleading
— User:YSSYguy, 03:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)