Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expenditure incidence
the recent additions appear to be a small and scattershot collection of loosely connected factoids (?), the largest of which appears to be more than a little . It does not amount to a coherent exposition of the subject (even at a stub level), which may, as Dingo1729 suggests, be better explained as part of Fiscal incidence
— User:Hrafn, 06:49, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:HOWTO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)