Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusta Holtz
There are three "sources" cited on the page. Two are GRG pages that have already been rejected as  eliable sources on the Reliable Sources noticeboard and the third is a single Associated Press obit. Isambard has it exactly right: "As per otability (people): People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject...." The notion that "record-holders" are inherently notable is not in any way a policy-based assertion. Indeed that notion is precisely the problem in this suite of articles
— User:David, 20:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:R||WP:N (Wikipedia:Redirect)