Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Imre (2nd nomination)
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better |reliable source coverage than this even attempts to show. People are not inherently notable just for owning cooking schools, or for being on the board of directors of the BIA in the small town where their cooking school is located, and historians don't get an automatic inclusion freebie just because their writing exists either — no matter what occupation you're trying to put out as his notability claim, he still has to be the ''subject'' of ''media'' coverage ''about'' his work in that role to clear the notability bar. As well, the old AFD discussion isn't actually as irrelevant here as it may seem at first — this version was literally recreated just slightly more than ''one year'' after the original discussion's closure, by the ''same''  who had created it the first time, but even though it wasn't even the slightest improvement on the old version it somehow slid under the radar until now instead of being immediately speedied on sight as a recreation of deleted content the way it should have been. '''Salt''' this while we're at it, because it has literally ''all'' the classic hallmarks of being self-promotion by a person who's very likely to just try again a third time once he notices that it's gone
— User:Bearcat, 20:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)