Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens for a Canadian Republic
I'll ignore that last comment. However, you'll need to point to the guideline which says that the burdon of proof is on me. Please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Links_and_ID_numbers what Wikipedia:Citing sources says about this, which states in part: "If your source is not findable online, it should be findable in reputable libraries, archives, or collections. If a citation without an external link is challenged as unfindable, any of the following is sufficient to show the material to be reasonably findable (though not necessarily |reliable): providing an ISBN or OCLC number; linking to an established Wikipedia article about the source (the work, its author, or its publisher); or directly quoting the material on the talk page, |briefly and in context". These sources are acceptable and I have offered to provide PDFs of all the articles to a neutral editor for verification, which is more than I'm required to do
— User:Freshacconci, 22:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:COPYVIO (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)