Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 8
nbsp; As per hat Wikipedia is NOT#Wikipedia is not a newspaper "...routine news reporting on things like...sports...is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia."&nbsp;  adds "Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats."&nbsp; The only citation currently in the article is that there were "160,000 buys" from a source that asks, "Please take some time and sign our guestbook!"; which is not "well-sourced prose".&nbsp; Given the absence of reliable citations, WP:V by itself is sufficient reason to delete this article, although primary sources can be reliable so this is not by itself a complete argument for deletion.&nbsp; At the same time, when sourcing the article means starting from zero sources, it means nothing is lost to editors in the deletion of this article under WP:V.&nbsp; The claim that there was a protest associated with this event, which as per WP:NRVE seems likely to be sourceable, does not mean that readers would also be interested in the UFC 8 sports event itself, which is another way of saying notability is not inherited.&nbsp; I concur with the nominator that there is no indication that the event has any enduring notability or significance.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 00:24, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:W||WP:SPORTSEVENT (Help:Watchlist)