Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd Rhode Island Heavy Artillery
Necrothesp is correct, but so is Christroutman, and I believe the need to write an encyclopedia article that clearly indicates where its material is sourced from () is much more important to encyclopedic integrity than having a cut-and-paste job to show that "some sort of information exists in some fashion someplace" (which is about as specific as it can get at present).  As far as I am concerned, this article is unsourced - without specific pages given, I have no empirical proof that the information in the article as presented exists in the source
— User:MSJapan, 16:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)