Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open access in Vietnam
per nom and . While this is absolutely a valid ''potential'' subject area for Wikipedia coverage, ''these'' are not the articles we're looking for. By and large they're |unsourced (and/or sourced only to UNESCO's main open access project, if anywhere at all, rather than to ''media'' coverage), and strike a tone that falls somewhere between an essay and a |how-to guide rather than being ''encyclopedically'' written and formatted. And the reason for both issues is that essentially they were copied and pasted from the UNESCO platform rather than being original Wikipedia content — but while  isn't an issue in this instance due to the free content nature of the UNESCO site, the lack of a copyvio problem still does not in and of itself ''exempt'' Wikipedia's copies from having to comply with our tone, structure and sourcing standards. Nominator is entirely correct that a more realistic approach would be to start with one base overview article, permitting by-country spinoffs as needed for the countries where we can source a sufficient volume of good content, rather than just jumping straight to a series of 80-100 articles generated by copy-pasting unencyclopedically formatted content from somewhere else
— User:Bearcat, 13:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:RS||WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:COPYVIO (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)