Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Watch (5th nomination)
Please, folks, let's debate the article on its own merits. If this were the fifth nomination over the period of, say, eight months, I'd agree; but it's not. The first AfD was in '''2005''', about four years ago. More to the point, |consensus can change. Therefore, arguments for keeping this article based solely on the fact that it has survived multiple prior AfDs are weak and mostly irrelevant. This article covers a topic on an obscure website with little or no notability. As mentioned above, self-references should be avoided unless the topic is unquestionably significant in real life; this website is mere navel-gazing and nothing more. I agree with the nomination statement and I believe deletion is appropriate. (FWIW, I also have a weak COI with the topic, but it doesn't affect my ability to judge this article in a neutral manner
— User:Juliancolton, 15:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CCC (Wikipedia:Consensus)