Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laure Zanna
without prejudice against later re-creation if her notability improves, per . Draftification would be acceptable but I'd recommend against it because the draft would likely need both several years waiting (for her to become notable) and significant rewriting (to write about the stuff she would have become notable for) before it could become acceptable. Puffing the article with minor things like early-career and best-paper awards and detailed descriptions of individual research papers sourced to those individual research papers are signs that the more significant awards, works by other people that cover her research in-depth, or other ways she could become notable haven't happened yet. As the discussion above suggests, the citation record is promising but not yet at the level needed for #C1 in a high-citation field, her "fellow" title is routine for all Oxbridge faculty rather than being the kind of fellow that passes #C3, and there is no indication that she passes any of the other criteria
— User:David, 05:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Too soon)