Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corruption in the United States
Nothing but a linkfarm.  As far as "keep per Alan Liefting" goes, Mr. Liefting doesn't advocate a single legitimate ground to keep.  That there might be other Corruption in X country articles is but a  argument - if the "other stuff" actually existed, which in fact it doesn't - that there is an alleged pro-US systemic bias on Wikipedia forms no part of inclusion criteria, and disambiguation pages commonly, well, I dunno ... ''disambiguate'' between choices, as this doesn't remotely attempt to do.  As Qwyrxian correctly states, there are list articles which do exactly this, more clearly and adeptly.  The article Mr. Liefting proposes to write, come to that, sounds like a heap of |original research and |synthesis
— User:Ravenswing, 10:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:NOR||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)