Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China exclusion policy of NASA
This has plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources, I don't think a good faith effort was ever made  it was nominated. As well as The Guardian and Scientific American sources in the article: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/11/nasa-chinese-scientists-conference-banhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/farside-politics-the-west-eyes-moon-cooperation-with-china/, about 30 seconds on google gives me ARS Technica: https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/12/china-completes-lunar-sampling-mission-eyes-next-steps-on-the-moon/, Politico: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/20/biden-china-space-448529, Time: https://time.com/5954941/u-s-china-should-collaborate-in-space/, The Telegraph: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/05/16/safety-comes-second-chinas-race-space/, Financial Times: https://www.ft.com/content/8a6bb0c0-9a6f-46c0-8438-48984c5e32dc, etc. Not opposed to a rename, and this article could very clearly do with some work, but we really do have to stop with these silly AfD nominations of clearly notable subjects. &#8209;&#8209
— User:Volteer1, 07:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)