Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partial cloverleaf interchange
The nomination seems to accept that the topic is notable (which it is), does not propose deletion and does not provide a valid reason to do anything else.  Instead, we mainly have insults – cruft, garbage, &c.  Note that the page has been separate since 2004 and that there is no recent discussion of the supposed issue(s) on its talk page.  See , , , &c
— user:Andrew, 19:28, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:BEFORE||WP:CRUFTCRUFT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)