Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstaLoad
Not a single one of the references meets the criteria for establishing notability. I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content. Cmon people - read the guidelines for establishing notability! The references are garbage. https://web.archive.org/web/20121104012047/http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/2010/jul10/07-01InstaLoadPR.aspx This is an announcement from Microsoft, fails as a PRIMARY source as they cannot be used to establish notability. not independent. Exact same failure for https://newatlas.com/microsoft-instaload/15605/ this from newatlas.com which is entirely based on an announcement. https://archive.is/BxA6i This reference from electronicproducts.com is an advert/churnalism from a partner company (and written by Tom Blaha the CEO) that licensed the technology, it fails because it is not Independent Content, fails . https://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/coolstuff/InstaLoad-to-Revolutionize-Battery-Installation This reference is a Primary source and cannot be used to establish notability and it is basically an advert. The last reference inserted by 4meter4 does not appear to be available online but it is also written by Tom Blaha, therefore cannot be used to establish notability as he is the CEO of a connected company. Topic is a total failure of GNG/NCORP
— User:HighKing, 13:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)