Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suga Mama (2nd nomination)
Not only is the article well-sourced, it is a good article.   is merely a set of guidelines, it is not a policy.  An article doesn't necessarily have to fulfill every single notability guideline to be notable.  Nowhere in the guidelines does it say that a song must have won an award or appeared on a chart to be notable.  It simply says that most songs that fulfil that criteria are "''probably notable''".  It also says "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article."  There is most certainly enough verifiable material to create a detailed article, and with 19 reliable sources, most from widely-printed media outlets, you cannot argue with that.   This is most certainly a violation of .  Go ahead and keep redirecting articles without consensus as you please.  If you don't plan to stop, prepare to be |blocked. You already have two warnings on your talk page at this moment
— User:Dream, 02:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NSONGS||WP:POINT||WP:BLOCK (Wikipedia:Notability)