Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Karachi plane crash
Truth be told, Mick, were I in your shoes, I wouldn't dare wave the PERNOM flag after having claimed "failing" the provisions of an '''essay''' to be a valid deletion ground.  That being said, let's examine your only other citation, that to .  First comes the Lasting Events clause, which states "It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable."  Strike one.  The second is Geographical Scope, "An event affecting a local area and reported only by the media within the immediate region may not necessarily be notable."  This is an event receiving international front page coverage.  Strike two.  Depth of coverage?  There's plenty of that.  Duration of coverage? "However, this may be difficult or impossible to determine shortly after the event occurs, as editors cannot know whether an event will receive further coverage or not. That an event occurred recently does not in itself make it non-notable."  This is a crash that occurred two days ago, and it's desperately premature to claim this as a leg upon which to stand.  Diversity of sources?  A slam dunk there too.  The truth is that despite your assertion that this article fails "most parts" of , it doesn't fail '''any''' part of it as of yet
— User:Ravenswing, 21:59, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:EVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)