Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Stanek
Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee her a Wikipedia article just because she exists, but the referencing (a mix of |primary source government documents that aren't support for notability at all and purely local coverage in her hometown media market, with no evidence whatsoever of any broader nationalized coverage) is not good enough. There's no  significance being shown here that would pass the |ten-year test
— User:Bearcat, 19:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:LASTING||WP:10YT (Wikipedia:No original research)