Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReviveMed
Well {{u|Ritchie333}}, I expect you know this already but your link to https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22ReviveMed%22+-wikipedia Google and a "whole bunch of news sources" isn't any good for the purposes of establishing notability (see ) especially when a look through the first dozen entries fails to uncover any story that meets the criteria for establishing notability (see ). https://www.mddionline.com/unlocking-potential-ai-fatty-liver-treatments The MDI source is extensively based on an interview with the founder and CEO and fails  as it is not an "intellectually independent" source. And https://www.forbes.com/sites/bijankhosravi/2018/03/08/how-persian-women-entrepreneurs-are-changing-the-tech-industry/#608e00fc562d the Forbes reference is a one sentence mention-in-passing to explain that ''Dr. Leila Pirhaji is the founder and CEO at ReviveMed.'' and fails . You also appear to be a little confused because, if you read the rationale for nomination above, you'd understand that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila Pirhaji|the Leila Pirhaji AfD which you say was closed as speedy keep was was not the result of a consensus reached by the community but a result of the withdrawal of the nomination because the article was changed from an article on Leila to this article on the company, ReviveMed. And .. while we're looking at the older AfD and seeing as how you've mentioned the article creator, I find this: ''Admit it is maybe too soon.'' - Jesswade88
— User:HighKing, 18:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GHITS||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)