Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moglix (3rd nomination)
At this point, based on the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMoglix&type=revision&diff=1032306781&oldid=1032295230 admission of the page creator, it is safe to say this meets speedy deletion. Per , "Copyright violations, extensive cases of advocacy, and undisclosed paid sock farms are frequently blown up. Anyone can start over as long as their version isn't itself a copyright or WP:PAID violation, or a total copy of the deleted content." The history and current failure to disclose meets the definition of "excessive cases of advocacy" in my opinion. Get rid of it so no more of our time is wasted on this paid advocacy
— User:CNMall41, 23:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)