Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Stunt (3rd nomination)
although much of the content out there appears to be weak with gossip-related comments, there is quite a lot out there that indicates that he is notable to a large group of people globally.  Although one can argue that some of the sources aren't reliable secondary sources, it would lead one to wonder why so many of them write articles about Mr. Stunt.  Furthermore, according to , ''"If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability."''  With that said, I suggest that we keep the article.  By the way, I too was canvassed here by
— User:Khocon, 20:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)