Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hogg
At this point, I think most of the arguments that are going to be made have been made and that it is evident that the article will be kept. As such, I would humbly suggest the possibility of '''ING''' the discussion. As I have made my opinions clear earlier, I will not be the one doing so, however, and given the nature of the debate, I don't think non-admine closure would be wise
— User:Acebulf, 05:10, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SNOWBALL (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)