Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mawla (2nd nomination)
Currently the article is strictly a  (or worse -- a partial dictionary entry in that it provides lexicographical information and usage without even including a straight definition). As Wikipedia specifically does not include articles that are dictionary definitions, this a problem regardless of how important the term is (there are lots of important ''terms'' that don't have Wikipedia articles. That said, if anyone wants to edit the article to be about a single ''concept'' rather than a word, I'd happily reconsider. Otherwise, a keep !vote misunderstands the purpose of Wikipedia vs. that of, say, Wiktionary. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 16:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)