Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead hand problem
I would like to say keep & expand. But the problem is verification , (usually) when used the meaning is seen as self evident and not explained, causing problems with citing examples.  The term is used beyond interpreting the United States Constitution, but with interpretations of laws/contracts/constitutions (and so on) in general and in the meaning (interpreters perspectives) of texts/document in regard to history or philosophy and the like. As well can refer in decisions and debates to where some lingering interest or influence (intentionally or unintentionally) is attached onto some thing (for example with wills/laws/contracts) and it is seen as a problem.  For poor of example of this have a look at the legal rule Rule against perpetuities
— User:Blue520, 15:33, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)