Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas E. Woodward
Not really an academic as such and should be considered under . I looked around and could not find substantial coverage of him by independent reliable sources. Nothing of relevance in GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Thomas%20E.%20Woodward%22&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws. GoogleBooks produces a bunch of hits for his namehttp://books.google.com/books?tab=sp&sa=N&q=%22Thomas+E.+Woodward%22&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N but upon checking closer almost all appear to be false positives (there are some exceptions such as a citation of his book herehttp://books.google.com/books?id=RFYo1rXi70UC&pg=PA303&dq=%22Thomas+E.+Woodward%22&ei=EKyfSJP5K5D0jgHx87D7BA&sig=ACfU3U0di6baesXGhHgya0y7RzX_W6nSuQ and another one herehttp://books.google.com/books?id=L5Y5JZkMIogC&pg=PP10&dq=%22Thomas+E.+Woodward%22&lr=&ei=g6yfSOOmM4_aigHF1rX7BA&sig=ACfU3U2gUrrQ52CRHmohrQ4HrUkJRTf8yQ). Very little in GoogleNews alsohttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=pn&q=%22Thomas+E.+Woodward%22 (20 hits, all but one are false positives; the single non-false positive is an article by the subject himselfhttp://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-22595677_ITM in Christianity Today). Does not appear to be a sufficinently prominent figure within the intelligent design movement and does not appear to pass 
— User:Nsk92, 03:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)