Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFOs and the Bible
This is not , but based on a lot of published work.  My personal belief is that the whole business a a load of cobblers, but that is '''my''' opinion.  A lot of published sources are cited, and editor's views of them are their .  I am certainly not an expert of the subject, but it is a view that people hold, and they are entitled to seek to put forward that view.  There is a significant difference between an article about a view, and a POV article.  If the article is expressing only the POV of its believers, the appropriate course is for some one to add a section setting out the arguments of those debunking the theory, so that the reader is offered both opposing POVs, and can make his own choice.  However, that implies improving the article, not deleting it
— User:Peterkingiron, 10:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:POV (Wikipedia:No original research)