Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Maupin (2nd nomination)
There is obviously either canvassing or socking going on here, likely both.  The ''one'' article offered above that qualifies |as a reliable source is a local newsweekly (and a minor one, at that) talking about Maupin in the context of being one of two leaders of a 10-person group from nearly a decade ago.  That is not a significant piece of journalism about Maupin.  Absolutely everything that contains the words "Caleb Maupin" one could Google was then shoveled in  whether those articles are about Maupin at all or not and without regards to the source quality in an attempt to demonstrate coverage.  This is ridiculous and ''weakens'' the argument that Maupin is notable in Wikipedia terms, not strengthens it.  When an editor need to troll through ''Washington Examiner'', Youtube, ''Breitbart'', ''The Free Beacon'' and even ''Infowars'' to find one-sentence quotes and the like to try to demonstrate notability they've actually demonstrated the opposite.  Attempts to offer up sites controlled by the China Ministry of Information or the Russia Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications as  are also not persuasive and further the impression that foreign state-controlled actors are attempting to promote a profile of Maupin as a serious journalist
— User:Eggishorn, 13:29, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)