Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Proctor
The case for  is borderline and given all the COI and sockpuppetry issues I think we're best off without. Given that he seems to have made such a big deal about not winning the Nobel, proper coverage of him should say something about it, but disinterested and reliable sources don't seem to exist. So we're left with an unbalanced article that just avoids talking about the issue, also not a good thing
— User:David, 05:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)