Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerri Ratliff
without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do better. The role she was appointed to is not an "inherently" notable one under , so she isn't automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because she has a job — her includability would come down to getting her over  on the ''sourcing'', but the sources here aren't cutting it: three of the five footnotes are |primary sources self-published by her own employers, which are not support for notability, and both of the other two just briefly namecheck her as a giver of soundbite in articles that aren't ''about'' her, which is not support for notability either. As I noted above, people do not attain notability by getting ''quoted'' in coverage of other ''things'', they attain notability by being the ''subject'' that ''other'' people are talking or writing ''about
— User:Bearcat, 15:39, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Notability)