Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrunal Jain
Am unaware of an earlier AFD, or how long ago it might have been... so for sake of discussion, let's ''pretend'' this is the first.  He seems popular enough in India so that when he was seen buying jeans, he was "mobbed" by his fans.http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-03-22/tv/31224250_1_mobbed-jeans-kids  And searches show he has recieved ''some'' coverage for his work in such |reliable sources as MSN|MSN India, Times of India, Mumbai Mirror, Indya.com, Deccan Chronicle, and Daily News & Analysis.http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mrunal+Jain%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mrunal+Jain%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#q=%22Mrunal+Jain%22&hl=en&prmdo=1&source=lnms&ei=ZwN0T5yeLcHWiAKMpp2SDw&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=1&ved=0CBUQ_AUoAA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=fd9da5a0a0015be8&biw=768&bih=415 and did star in such as ''Hitler Didi''.http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-12-31/tv/30568283_1_zee-tv-s-hitler-didi-rajput-sameer and several other notable projects, so it might be arguable that though weak on , he has |verifiability showing he pushes at .  Unfortunately, Indian news media quite often uses a short format for reporting of what is of note to their country, and while offering |verifiability of his works, such short and to-the-point blurbs are not seen as being substantial coverage. I know that notability is not dependent upon brief mentions, but even if in reliable sources and short and to the point, do we then automatically dismiss them as  "trivial" simply |because of that format being the India media's preferred way of reporting?  A thought-provoking question? Perhaps. I am reminded that the spirit and the letter of |the notability guidelines are concerned with having sources offering enough content for us write articles from a neutral point of view. So even if short, do the available sources provide us with enough information to do just that... |confirm his work and write a neutral article?  Worth a ponder
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 06:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:ENT||WP:V||WP:CSB||WP:GNG||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)