Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Killick
pace'' . The current sourcng is all |primary. Like Darth guy above, a  search found no third party, independent reliable coverage demonstrating notability.  clearly applies: the chances of an ECR with three papers uder their belt being independently notable in their field is ''phenonomnally'' unlikely (although I grant not impossible, and not perennially).{{pb}}Disclosure: Arguably, special:diff/925997783|I was brought here by {{u|Schlossbergfes}}'s ing
— User:Serial, 17:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIAS||WP:PTS||WP:BEFORE||WP:TOOSOON||WP:CANVAS (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)