Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe (actress)
since subject fails , , | (aka WP:GNG), and . The multiple porn-industry awards do not confer Wikinotability on our subject; not since WP:PORNBIO was deprecated. As to the rest of the links submitted above to support a general notion of notability, they are worthless, either on their own or cumulatively: A https://www.theguardian.com/books/2001/mar/17/society.martinamis1 write up about where the porn business was heading in 2001, in which our subject is used among many others as a source or "inside" information; an https://web.archive.org/web/20070126065004/http://www.adultdvdtalk.com/chat/chloe.asp open discussion with porn fans organized in 2000 by the "Adult DVD Talk" website that hosts such discussions with every other female porn-performer; some https://web.archive.org/web/20060610195231/http://www.rogreviews.com/interviews/chloe.asp interview by a |blogger plus another https://www.salon.com/2001/07/12/seymore/ piece by a blogger, hosted in 2001 on ''Salon (magazine)|Salon'', about "extreme porn" with interviews by some of its practitioners, such as our subject; a 2005 https://web.archive.org/web/20070930030907/http://adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=7766 report on "AdultFYI" featuring Chloe on her "AVN Adult Entertainment Expo|AEE experience" (flu & no voice); and that's it. The rest of the links are about porn awards. We cannot be supporting inclusion in Wikipedia on the basis of such |thin evidence
— User:The, 19:14, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACTOR||WP:ANYBIO||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NPERSON||WP:BLOGS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)