Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar Hager
without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do much better. Having a "large" entry in the Kentucky history book is certainly a potential ''start'' down the road toward making him more notable than most other smalltown mayors — but the link is just to a directory page for the book on Google Books, not to an actual ''copy'' of the book by which anybody can ''see'' how large his entry really is or isn't, so it isn't a magic bullet all by itself as the article's ''only'' notability-assisting source. And of the other five sources here, three are |primary sources that do not bolster notability at all, one is a self-published family genealogy, and the last is an incomplete citation to a local history book which is also impossible to verify whether its content about him is substantive or not — but since that source is being cited ''only'' to support the base fact that he was a mayor, and not for any substantive content ''about'' his mayoralty, I suspect that it isn't very substantive at all. A smalltown mayor's article needs to be much better referenced than this to actually get him over  #2
— User:Bearcat, 17:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:No original research)