Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selcovia
It's noticeable that there is nothing in http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=Selcovia&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdtf=&as_sdts=5&hl=en Scholar. The sources that I can find all use much the same language, suggesting a common origin, and even http://www.earlybritishkingdoms.com/bios/senylsv.html  they say only that one Senyllt: "''appears to have become king of the region around Selkirkshire where the people were known as the Selgovae. Although the name of his kingdom is unknown, for identification purposes, the Latin 'Selcovia,' would seem appropriate.''" A name |made up one day because it "would seem appropriate" is not a good enough foundation for a Wikipedia article. Per  we would need evidence that it was a widely accepted term
— User:JohnCD, 20:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFT||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)