Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGB Alliance
Present version is well-sourced and cautiously worded. That there are other unused sources which mention the article subject is ''not'' an argument to ''delete'': quite the opposite. Arguments for deletion on the basis of what they speculate the author's intentions to be, or what they speculate the intentions of other commenters to be, violate |Assume Good Faith. Objections about text that was in a previous draft but not in the article we're discussing are irrelevant. Arguments about the ''past'' consensus about the reliability of PinkNews somehow overriding the ''present'' consensus are just bizarre
— User:MartinPoulter, 09:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)