Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside In (organization)
I plan to expand the article further, but I want to register my keep before this is closed on the grounds that this organization clearly passes  in that coverage of it can be found in "in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization". Lack of citations in the article is not a criterion for deletion, when there are sources available, and though there is more coverage that could be added, I believe the article as it stands shows there is sufficient independent coverage (including books, magazines, newspapers, and research papers) and to pass a minimum standard of |notability. I'd invite {{ping|Delta13C}} to reevaluate the supposed lack of mentions in independent media. I'm also having trouble finding a guideline that says local sources (noting that the organization is located in the largest metro area in the state and one of the three largest metros in the region, so when we're talking "local" that doesn't mean it's a place like, say Greenhorn, Oregon|Greenhorn) are not reliable sources. In any case, the organization, as cited in the article, is notable as one of the first free clinics on the west coast, as a pioneer in needle exchange programs, and as a pioneer in naloxone dispensing legislation
— User:Valfontis, 08:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NONPROFIT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)