Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drastic Team
per , the popular press are often not reliable for scientific claims. As for the CNET piece, it is lovlingly PROFRINGE. As for RSP, the last discussion on the reliability of CNET was 6 years ago, and it states that {{tq|CNET is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles.}}, not reliable in general, and lab-leak claims fall well outside CNET's wheelhouse in consumer electronics, and the coverage has not been mirrored by other more reputable news sources. As for the other articles, they are incidental mentions and do not consitute SIGCOV
— User:Hemiauchenia, 12:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:MEDPOP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)