Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanwal Ameen
Our inclusion criteria for academics are weak enough as it is, I don't see any need to lower the bar even more for persons from some countries. I am disappointed by the vast majority of the "keep" !votes above. Some don't know what a "named chair" is. Most don't cite which sources show that this person is a "policy maker" or otherwise wields significant influence. Even in countries less developed than Europe or the US, newspapers and such do exist and a "policy maker" would be suspected to hit the news from time to time (and Urdu sources are welcome, Google Translate has become good enough to at least give a rough idea what a text in a language that you cannot read is about). But the sources don't seem to be there. Armeen's Google Scholar profile (https://scholar.google.fr/citations?user=ZhuLbeYAAAAJ&hl=en here) indicates a fair number of publications (but far removed from the 100 claimed in the infobox) and a decent citation record, but not close to what we usually take to indicate notability. Quite decent for somebody just 11 years after their PhD, but nothing more than that. Given that she's mid-career at best, this may be a case of , but I dropped my |crystal ball yesterday, so I can't be certain that she'll become notable in the future
— User:Randykitty, 12:48, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Too soon)