Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed al-Nami
This is silly. There's tons of well-sourced information about this obviously notable figure. The 9/11 Commission Report ''does'' cover Al Nami as an individual, from his origin to his recruitment and training to his activities in the U.S., to his appearance in various videos, to his newsworthy death. There are many, many reliable secondary sources. Like Herostratus and Tank Man, Al Nami is primarily remembered for one event, which is the way he wanted it, and like Herostratus and Tank Man he passes our notability guidelines with flying colors. Does anyone really think it would benefit Wikipedia in any way to delete a thorough, meticulously researched article on one of the 9/11 hijackers? The mind reels. (By the way,  doesn't apply ''at all'', since it's a part of  and Al Nami is quite resoundingly dead.) &ndash
— User:Quadell, 18:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)