Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (2nd nomination)
It's an atypical article, but it's still an asset to the encyclopedia.  The criteria for what items get included on the list could be made more definite, and the sourcing improved, but that's about it.   is there to keep material with no encyclopedic value out of the encyclopedia -- this list does not qualify -- and  is not a deletion catch-all.  Claiming that an article is "|indiscriminate, delete" is a non-rationale and an abuse of the AfD process, as far as I'm concerned
— User:Father, 16:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)