Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Psychology, NTNU
ping|Ella Sjødyr}} Your inexperience in wikipedia AFDs is showing here. Arguments not based in wikipedia policy will not convince other editors to support an article's inclusion. The main policies at issue in this case are , , , and erifiability. Making claims without citing evidence doesn't go over well because Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth|wikipedia is not interested in what is true and but what is verifiably true. If you want people to support you, you need to show url links to '''independent secondary and tertiary sources''' where either the Department of Psychology, NTNU or the Psykologisk institutt is the '''main subject''' of that coverage (ie not just secondary to a larger article on the university). Wikipedia:Offline sources|Offline sources that are '''independent''' of the subject can also bolster your argument by listing them here in this discussion. You will need to provide the Title, Author(s), Publisher, Date/year of Publication, and page numbers along with a description as to how this source is a significant supporting reference (ie the source must cover the topic more than just in passing). If you cannot provide this kind of evidence the article will be deleted. The book you gave possibly lends toward notability, however, ''Tapir Akademisk Forlag'' appears to be owned and operated by a student organization and I am not sure if this publishers works are considered reliable (ie peer reviewed and not self published). So far there appears to be only one good potential source (and not if the publisher isn't good). Wikipedia require '''at least three quality sources''' to pass 
— User:4meter4, 16:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:ORG||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)