Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maclab
all three with LabChart, under one title (e.g. PowerLab).Rationale:MacLab/maclab is the old name of PowerLab, and LabChart is the visualization end of the whole shebang. All four are part of the same system.In response to the notion that that there are "hundreds of citations" (worse yet "6000 citations")..."Oodles of citations" is gross marketing hype, and incompatible with what the real world understands under the term "citation". What the company website has done is list papers that merely note that they ''used'' the product. In order to ensure experimental reproducibility, researchers ''are required'' to note which tools were used in their experiments. The mere indication that such-and-such tool was used does ''not'' constitute a "citation" of that tool beyond its raw data value. That the website calls these allusions "citations" is misguiding, and is no more meaningful than suggesting that a researcher who times an experiment is "citing" his watch.The gimmicky, out-of-context misappropriation of those allusions on a company's website |does not qualify them as ''Wikipedia references'', which is how they were forwarded here on WP.FWIW: I have just http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LabChart&diff=prev&oldid=259897029 cleaned up LabChart. The ADInstruments marketing folks may consider the revised version an example of how to write a sales flyer such that it doesn't violate Wikipedia's  policy
— User:Fullstop, 13:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NOTADVERTISING (Wikipedia:No original research)