Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shail Kaushal
I'm not an expert on New Zealand politics, but from what I can tell the subject's position appears to be equivalent to what I would know as a ''borough'' council rather than the actual citywide government — but even in the rare class of cities that ''are'' large enough to NPOL their main city councillors (which I'll grant that Auckland is), the ''borough'' councillors still ''don't'' get an automatic inclusion freebie (even London can only NPOL the members of the main London Assembly, and ''not'' every borough councillor in Hackney or Barking or Croydon.) The coverage here is ''not'' substantive enough, however, to pass  in lieu — Bondj really needs to learn about the difference between |significant coverage that's substantively ''about'' the subject vs. coverage which just namechecks the subject's existence in the process of being ''about'' something or someone ''else''. The coverage ''here'' is mostly of the ''latter'' type, but what ''we'' need to deem Kaushal notable enough for an article is far more of the ''former'' than has been shown here: it takes ''more'' than just ''one'' piece of substantive coverage to clear GNG
— User:Bearcat, 14:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)