Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No homo
My initial impression when I saw the article link was "delete", but having read it, it is well-sourced, interesting, and informative. Even in its current state, it is far more developed than a dictionary definition, and it is arguable whether it is a neologism since it was  coined in the early 1990s according to the source. Google News has 1,700+ hits, most of which appear to be related to this phrase, and there are even a couple in Google Books.  does not apply to terms that are notable in their own right through |reliable third-party coverage
— User:Strikehold, 02:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)