Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowser and Blitz
In reading the above comments in this debate, I haven't seen a single person even ''attempt'' to justify this article's inclusion based on the |standard criteria for inclusion. I suspect this is because there is no way to actually justify including this article based on |notability. In fact, I more than suspect this -- a GNews, GScholar and GHits search confirms this beyond a shadow of a doubt. I mean, it doesn't even get more than 2 or 3 ''Google hits'' that are about the topic and aren't mirrors or Wiki products. The two GNews hits are the character names appearing in credits or a plot summary (and one mention per hit), and there are no Scholar hits at all. '''Clarifying''': I support a redirect/merge of content as well, although any merge needs to be handled carefully and with an eye toward not overwhelming the target article with a ton of information on one character
— User:Ginsengbomb, 08:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)