Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego: The Adventures of Clutch Powers
per meeting .  For this article, its topic notability is |established  through |multiple sources being available even if not (yet) used. ie: http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/41329/lego-adventures-of-clutch-powers/ ''DVD Talk'', http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/clutchpowers.php ''DVD Verdict'', http://cinemagazine.nl/lego-de-avonturen-van-clutch-powers-lego-the-adventures-of-clutch-powers-2010-recensie/ ''Cinemagazine'' (Dutch), https://outnow.ch/Movies/2010/Lego-TheAdventuresOfClutchPowers/Review/ ''Out Now'' (German), http://www.moviemuser.co.uk/Reviews/4851/LEGO-The-Adventures-of-Clutch-Powers-DVD.aspx ''Moviemuser'' (UK), https://www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/lego-the-adventures-of-clutch-powers ''Commonsense Media'', https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Lego%3A+The+Adventures+of+Clutch+Powers%22%2C+review&oq=%22Lego%3A+The+Adventures+of+Clutch+Powers%22%2C+review&gs_l=serp.12...2669.4762.0.7565.8.8.0.0.0.0.113.813.3j5.8.0....0...1c.1.64.serp..8.0.0.9p3lBjKUk_w and others. And sorry {{u|LukeSurl}}, while Rotten Tomatoes is not perfect, it being the |only source currently used does not mean the topic non-notable or not improvable
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 12:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:BURDEN||WP:NPOSSIBLE||WP:UGLY (Wikipedia:Notability)