Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anyuta Slavskaya
per nom ( not met;  not met), and per {{u|Novem Linguae}} (regarding mostly-interview coverage). An interview is not unreliable or non-independent simply because it's an interview, and interviews in combination with regular reporting-style coverage can definitely reinforce a good look for SIGCOV, but there's a big problem when there isn't much potentially relevant coverage in the fist place (which is the case), and what coverage there is is ''mostly interviews''. This view ''does'' align with policy. We can, and need to, look whether the coverage is significant on a per source basis, and not only as a general impression. Interviews are often long, and are something we'd generally call non-trivial, but they're very rarely ''in-depth''. If you couldn't take a published text and derive a few ''factual, own-voice'' content points from it, that could (ostensibly) be incorporated here, it isn't really an instance of in-depth coverage, and generally you ''can't'' do so with interviews: obviously, an individual's views, and their claims (unless they appear somehow reinforced by the interviewer, editor...), are not good references for factual claims on Wikipedia, and can't form a backbone of an article. Keeping based on an argument that what's presented here is significant coverage would be kind of unfortunate
— User:Alalch, 21:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SINGER (Wikipedia:Notability)