Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binders full of women
article fulfills  which stipulates that ''"...to support an article about a particular term  we must cite what reliable |secondary sources, such as books and papers, '''say about the term''', not books and papers that '''use''' the term"'' (emphasis mine). The countless scores of international reliable secondary sources that have written about "Binders full of women" do exactly that: the term "Binders full of women" is thoroughly explained in context, analyzed and interpreted (e.g. http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/mitt-romneys-revelatory-binders-full-of-women/2012/10/17/d0acc962-186e-11e2-a55c-39408fbe6a4b_story.html 1, http://www.welt.de/politik/wahl/us-wahl-2012/article109927471/Amerika-lacht-ueber-Romneys-Ordner-voller-Frauen.html 2 http://www.punchng.com/columnists/medals/american-women-in-a-binder/ 3, http://www.newsday.com/opinion/oped/hess-mitt-romney-s-binders-full-of-women-mean-cabinets-full-of-women-1.4129800 4). The term is not just merely used. Thus this term has fulfilled Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for neologisms
— User:Amsaim, 15:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:PSTS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)