Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hookers with hearts of gold
Funny, but not supported by : "Lists should always include unambiguous statements of membership criteria based on definitions made by reputable sources, especially in difficult or contentious topics. Beware of those cases in which the definitions themselves are disputed... Even if it might "seem obvious" what qualifies for membership in a list, explicit is better than implicit." If any of these entries can actually find a source (any of the currently 71 entries all of which are unsourced) can find a secondary source so it is not just Wikipedia contributors saying that these character are hookers with a heart of gold, then they can be added to the main article (assuming the main article can find a source to describe what a "hooker with a heart of gold" is
— User:Maclean25, 07:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LIST (Wikipedia:Lists)