Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zulu Wikipedia
No secondary sources to demonstrate notability.  does not work in reverse; the essay linked to is about how large numbers don't automatically make something notable. A website with small numbers probably isn't notable. Sources are what makes an article notable, and this article only has some statistics. There is a consensus that notability isn't simply "inherited" (see Wikipedia:Notability/RFC:compromise), there must be sources. gnore all rules|Ignore all rules is a dangerous gambit. You are in effect saying "I know this article doesn't follow policy, but this article is a special case." You have not demonstrated ''how'' this article is a special case. You would have a much better chance to save this article if you find sources and use them to improve the article, and not have to fall back to AR. Until then, I have to vote delete
— User:Phirazo, 15:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIG||WP:I||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)