Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiles of the Hold (2nd nomination)
How can you have a "Keep" argument that says the subject is not notable? No reliable third party sources address the subject. The only source is from the book itself. There is no policy or guideline basis for a keep argument. The good faith of the editor not withstanding. As the source for this is the book itself, this is  at best. There is no point in userfying this. The quality of the keep arguments here astounds me
— User:Dlohcierekim, 03:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)