Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tabletop Simulator
per . There is one reliable source covering this: two paragraphs posted on RPS. I don't believe the Entertainment Buddha source is reliable. For one, it's written by https://www.linkedin.com/pub/raymond-porreca/48/788/293 a 2010 college grad who up until a year ago had only worked retail and appears to have no other experience in the gaming industry before being made Managing Editor of the website. Does anyone seriously believe this is a reliable source? Because I'd like to hear your reasoning. People in this AfD say "the source'''s''' available" or "seems well sourced". I don't consider one short RPS article to be "notable media coverage in the references". GNG requires ''significant coverage'' in ''multiple'' sources. If this article is kept due to having only two paragraphs on RPS, I think that would be a very low bar for inclusion, and I don't think we need to ignore all rules every time RPS posts two paragraphs on their website
— User:Odie5533, 17:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)