Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Shaver
as originator.  The Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines for people in general say "published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject ... trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability."  Mere listings of what work a person has done or published are surely insufficient.  For |creative professionals, the relevant tests are "widely cited by their peers", "a significant new concept, theory or technique", "a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews", "work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries."  None of these appear to be satisfied.  Have the stories or games been the subject of a book or multiple periodical articles or reviews?  I think not.  In fact the only game on which she is reported to be lead designer has not appeared yet
— User:Thompson, 11:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE (Wikipedia:Notability)