Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conspiracy theories of the United states presidential election, 2016
Passes  - everything sourced to RS (''Washington Post'', ''New York Times'', CNBC, etc.) and RS establish these ideas, though ludicrous, pass our GNG for sheer volume and breadth of repetition, not unlike other weird ideas like Roswell UFO incident, etc. The article is a sober, academic treatment and is not actually ''promoting'' the ideas, which is a key criteria of PROFRINGE. The first section of this entry, further, establishes the underlying sociological and anthropological importance of irrational thinking in American politics by reference to academic study, justifying an entry providing deeper examination. Finally, not a "hodge podge" but meets our definition of 
— User:LavaBaron, 21:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROFRINGE||WP:LISTDD (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)