Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Conaghan
Actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they list roles — the notability test is not "he has been in stuff", but "he has received |reliable source coverage in real media ''about'' his performances in stuff". But the external links being linkfarmed here aren't doing that: one is just a Google search for photos of him, which has nothing to do with notability at all; one is from a WordPress blog, which is not a reliable source; one is a theatre's self-published press release about its own production, which is not an independent source; and the only one that is a real media source just mentions his name in an overview of ''all'' the casting announcements for a stage production, and is not ''about Mark Conaghan'' in any non-trivial way, so it is not enough all by itself. These sources don't make him permanently notable by themselves, and nothing stated in the article body is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better sourcing than this
— User:Bearcat, 21:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)