Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Lok
I see the weak aspects of the sourcing of the article and have read the above debate and Jake's explanation of sources. It is a good idea to keep the article for now and if more sources are not available in future, it can be renominated. However, I would like to see if the article can develop if given a chance as the bibliography section of the person rings some notability bells to me. Talking about TV coverage, TV coverage does not need verification by news sources, infact TV coverage is a secondary source in itself and therefore should be taken as . It is an assumption that the coverage is advertorial which we should not take at face value and give the article six months (which is the normal time before an article should ideally be renominated) to see if it can be improved. Special:Contributions/50.100.174.75|50.100.174.75
— [[User talk:50.100.174.75|talk]])   — [[Special:Contributions/50.100.174.75|50.100.174.75]] ([[User talk:50.100.174.75|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic., 14:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)