Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DbVisualizer
While the number of references is impressive, their quality is not. I would like to emphasize that a mix of references where some fail to  (a thesis about JPA that uses DbV but could have used any similar software), some are not independant (press releases), some are not reliable (blogs) and some are passing mentions is no substitute for '''even a single source''' that matches all criteria all of GNG. Special pleading ("but it is software, so there are less sources or sources of lower quality") ought to be discussed at the guideline level (e.g.  or   though the latter one is only an essay
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INHERITED||WP:PRODUCT||WP:SOFTWARE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)