Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of French apartheid
There are a couple of sources that actually appear to pursue the comparison.  Most on the other hand merely use the word "apartheid" once for what appears to be rhetorical effect.  These passages are then presented in such a way as to make the rhetorical effect look like an extended comparison.  All fifteen of the sources are listed twice, first as "Notes" and then as "References," in order to give the illusion of depth in sourcing.  The fact that this article has been cobbled together by two editors who know nothing about the subject matter and are merely compiling quotes they've found through Google-searches, and that the  of all this is to create a bargaining chip with which to bring about the deletion of Israeli apartheid|an article they're ideologically opposed to, doesn't bode well for its future quality.  I vote only "weak delete," however, because I don't know that much more about the subject than the authors do, so it's ''possible'' that there's a quality article to be written on this by an editor with genuine interest in and knowledge of the subject.  If that's the case – that is, if there are sufficient RS-foundations for this and such an editor comes forward, I wish him or her the best of luck in coaxing the article out of the sweaty palms of the pranksters now clutching it.  '''For the purposes of this AfD, the comments and recommendations of editors with experience editing France-related (or civil-rights-related) articles should be given much more weight than those of other editors
— User:G, 16:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)