Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EFiction
I'm still not convinced notability has been established.  None of the sources on the article are unambiguously |reliable sources by Wikipedia's criteria.  Notability must be established by multiple in-depth references in reliable sources.  There's no hard-and-fast definition of reliable sources, and they can be online, in print, or on tv/radio, but there are various guidelines: Are they self-published (bad) or produced by a commercial non-vanity publisher (good)? Does the publisher edit and fact-check contributions before publication? Are contributions written by professional journalists/academics/people trained in writing factual content? Is the source publication itself notable i.e. does it have a Wikipedia article, or could a WP article be written? Has the source got a significant publishing history or did it start last week?  I've seen a lot of interest about e-publishing and self-published e-books in the mainstream press lately, so I don't believe the arguments that "the mainstream press doesn't cover e-books so of course there are no reliable sources", but even if that were true, we can't trust random people's blogs
— User:Colapeninsula, 09:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)