Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epineurial repair
Oh My Gosh.  Well, at least this one is honest, and I hope the prof is reading. So, for the information of your professor, it is still quite a horrible article in terms of prose and organization, and there is currently no indication that it uses sources correctly (per ).  If the article had a single PMID, we could determine what is there that could be kept, and delete the rest.    As it stands, pending addition of PMIDs and clarification of what secondary reviews are actually being used, I'm on the fence as to whether it should be '''merged''' to Epineurium, which is certainly not overloaded at this point
— User:SandyGeorgia, 20:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MEDRS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)