Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Ritter (2nd nomination)
There is nothing in the Wikipedia article about Revolt that speaks to its reliability as a source. Notability does not in any way equate with reliability.  The National Enquirer is notable but totally unreliable. Also, interviews with the subject of the article lend very little to notability.  Sources for notability need to be independent and obviously what he has to say about himself is not that.  An interview with a respected authority in the industry about the subject of the article would show notability, if it came from a reliable source. It's really not  to infer that editors who have voted here haven't read the article.  And  is not a valid arguement at AfD. It would behoove you to read the instructions for posting here linked at the top of the page. Finally, you seem to be missing an understanding of the basis of notability. It is almost completely based in how much has been written about the subject in reliable sources. His importance in the industry is not all that relevant. The fact is that generally not much is written about people in the music industry that are not performers
— User:John, 18:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)