Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonmage (2nd nomination)
I think it's been demonstrated above that this article meets the . Because of this, a deletion would be unusual, and I'm not sure what basis this would be for doing that. (A lof the "votes" above were made before the new refs were found.) Granted, the refs ''in the article now'' are very poor. But that is not a reason for deleting an article and never has been
— User:Herostratus, 05:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)