Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/321 North Clark
It initially seemed non-notable, and almost all of the sources that turn up in a search are clearly  coverage of transactions, people moving in and out and so forth. These must be ignored for the purposes of this discussion. But I was able to find http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/24759104.html?dids=24759104:24759104&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Apr+10%2C+1988&author=Paul+Gapp%2C+Architecture+critic&pub=Chicago+Tribune+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&desc=THE+ODD+COUPLE+QUAKER%2C+NIKKO+STAND+TOGETHER+IN+UNEASY+UNION&pqatl=google this Chicago Tribune article, which dwells on the building itself in a significant way. It's also discussed in http://books.google.ae/books?id=Gf1bAS6OxvYC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=%22quaker+tower%22&source=bl&ots=z1elqvYZWs&sig=MSnVkQEmoy00iytKdKlfId2Phqo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3uSAUNq3E8HLrQeEyYCwBA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22quaker%20tower%22&f=false this book and http://books.google.ae/books?id=aQE21zTaju8C&pg=PA562&lpg=PA562&dq=%22quaker+tower%22&source=bl&ots=MsDikVI3ci&sig=ro72OnYJxfMqMLUju88LQ0MKp6s&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3uSAUNq3E8HLrQeEyYCwBA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22quaker%20tower%22&f=false here, although briefly. Combined with the Tribune naming it one of the most important buildings of the '80s, as cited above, I think this passes . I suspect that there are other reliable sources covering the building, but that they may not exist online because much of the coverage appeared in the 1980s
— User:Batard0, 05:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)