Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imani Hakim
The  or not, the fact remains that after being listed for two weeks nothing has been added to the article with regard to sourcing, and the article is, as mentioned, essentailly a UBLP at this point. The fact that no sources have been added to the article in two weeks indicates that none of the "sheer mass of coverage" rises to the level of "substanstial coverage" in |reliable sources and thus this should be deleted
— User:The, 00:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GHITS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)