Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keqin Li
It's hardly the sign of a good faith nomination to delete almost all of the content from the article and then claim that it should be deleted all the way because it's so short (the more-complete pre-nominated version is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keqin_Li&oldid=874820512 here). Even in its shortened state, the article clearly demonstrates a pass of . And the claim that the anonymous editor who expanded it from its sub-stub state should be reverted and their edits used as an excuse to delete the article is, without evidence, a |personal attack
— User:David, 20:18, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:NPA (Wikipedia:Notability)