Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Lipstick (2nd nomination)
Though I !voted to "keep" last time, this should probably be redirected to ''Talk That Talk''. Since the first nomination,  has (rightfully, in my view) been clarified to note that songs must establish notability independent of its parent album to warrant a standalone article. In this case, such coverage in reliable independent sources is rather limited - if we accept http://popdust.com/2011/11/17/rihanna-talk-that-talk-bonus-tracks-red-lipstick-leak-new-review/ this write-up as one piece of significant coverage there still must be a second to meet the "multiple, non-trivial" standard. Further, the remaining sections of the article - "Recording and production" and "Credits and personnel" - merely duplicate the album's liner notes (i.e., no independent coverage). The "Charts" references yield only listings; no coverage. The spirit of , as I see it, is that a song must, ''in addition to'' having "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article", have coverage beyond "the context of reviews of the album on which it appears". I'm not convinced this song qualifies
— User:Gongshow, 17:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NSONGS||WP:NSONGS (Wikipedia:Notability)