Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Crowder (3rd nomination)
This person's career has advanced to meet  and start to nudge slightly at ... and, differently from the version that was deleted in 2011, |independent secondary reliable sources with editorial oversite Steven Crowder#References|indeed cite this version of article. Using an essay as a rationale for deletion is fine, but I prefer looking to #REASON and seeing if the rationale falls within that list of valid deletion criteria. It's a suitable stub and it serves the project and its readers for this to remain and grow over time and through editorial effort
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 10:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:RS||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Notability)