Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Adam Briggs
Sorry, not notable - which means, not recognized or written about by independent reliable sources (see  and ). Looking at the references in the article: one, the only detailed one, is from a less-than-one-year-old quarterly supplement to a small regional newspaper; one is actually an op-ed or letter to the editor written BY the subject; and one is a blog article which describes the subject's efforts to land a job as a CIO. (If he is such a notable tycoon, why is he trolling for a job as a CIO? And is he hoping to point to this Wikipedia article to support his job search?) As for Vator it's a directory-type listing, presumably self-supplied. Not a single eliable source among them
— User:MelanieN, 03:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS||WP:R (Wikipedia:Notability)