Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Pistol
Per Piotrus. As the article's creator, I am fully aware of the qualifications for  and I believe this article fully passes them. The sites cited are some of the most major game journalism sites out there. This just seems like  and the nom has refused to discuss whether the article is notable and isn't assuming good faith. Per Piotrus, there is one article entirely about the Smart Pistol's gameplay implications, and many numerous mentions. There's also https://www.htxt.co.za/2017/03/20/3d-printed-smart-pistol-from-titanfall-auto-aiming-bullets-not-included/ this article that hasn't been integrated into the article yet about how a real life prop version was created, and https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/02/ars-plays-titanfall-editors-share-their-thoughts-on-the-beta/ an entire article by Kyle Orland about how good the Smart Pistol is that I should be adding in shortly
— User:Zxcvbnm, 09:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)