Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simcha Eichenstein
Fails . "Looks" apparently can be deceiving. There are literally "thousands" of "long-time NY political operatives". Someone "being the first" might be notable to Ripley's but not an encyclopedia recording of possible future events. |GNG would certainly be a factor, especially concerning getting elected to a notable office, or else we can delete five of the seven election related sources. While we are on the "political" aspect of notability, since Wikipedia is not a |crystal ball, it is |too soon to even consider. Create the article and wait and see is not included in any policy or guideline. Because there is |newspaper mentioning of a subject does not mean Wikipedia should have an article on it. We don't list every politician running for state office (there will be some local or state coverage) and throwing in religious |sensationalism is not encyclopedic nor the |scandal of an acquaintance. Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event|''People "notable" for one future possible event'' does not count. '''NOTE''': The ''New York Magazine'' might be reliable but what does the long "soap opera" addition '''attached to a reference''', have to do with the price of tea in China, notability, or the subject? The reference  "Are Liberal Jewish Voters a Thing of the Past?" looks like we are advocating for voter turnout
— User:Otr500, 15:59, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOLITICIAN||WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:SENSATIONAL||WP:NOTSCANDAL||WP:too soon (Wikipedia:Notability)