Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H2O Audio
I'll first note that there isn't a rationale given for why this article is being nominated for deletion.  That somebody tagged it for speedy deletion and it was contested is not a reason for deletion.  After digging int he article history, I'm assuming it is on |notability grounds.  The references provided in the article do not do a good job of establishing notability.  The US Patent Office does nto establish notability.  Neither does Michael Phelps facebook page, nor Laird Hamilton's website.  I'll also note that they aren't even |reliable sources.  However, they've received coverage in http://www.macworld.com/article/133185/2008/04/ipodwatercase.html Macworld, http://www.calendarlive.com/services/site/bal-sp.phelps17jun17,2,7664429.story LA Times, http://www2.counton2.com/cbd/news/science/technology/article/enjoy_some_h2o_audio_next_time_you_go_swimming/39967/ WCBD, and other minor coverage such as http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=190400312.  Not a trememdous amount, but enough to estalish notability for me
— User:Whpq, 17:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)