Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid
Every major authoritative dictionary of the English language from the OED to M-W to Webster's New International defines "apartheid" both as the proper name for South Africa's former system and as a generic political term for systemic segregation.  The articles in this pseudo-series are merely |gathering instances of the regular use of a word and |building narratives to thread the instances together.  Wikipedians ''never'' decided – not repeatedly, not ''ad nauseum'', not even once – that "Wikipedia can have an article on the epithet."  What was decided, rather, was that '''if''' use of the word or concept (or "epithet" if you will) provoked enough discussion, commentary, controversy, scholarship, and international debate, then ''that debate'' could be considered encyclopedic.  A very different thing.  Creating a series of unsourced hoax articles in order to leverage deletion of an article that's survived six AfDs is "guerrilla warfare"; addressing the disruption head-on and through the usual channels is not
— User:G, 20:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)