Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Tech (philosophy) (3rd nomination)
There was just a AfD earlier this month. This article is based on primary sources. It is perfectly legitimate to cite authors of books as a sources about what tbeir own own books say. Just because there are no secondary sources available, it doesn't mean the article should be deleted. And, Neo-Tech is definitely noteable.  (neologism) doesn't even apply
— User:JoeMystical, 17:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)