Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djanan Turan (2nd nomination)
per Nom and GN-z11. I looked at the sources, and those available, and ''"Plenty of sources"'' is not a valid criteria. Yes, we always want  more coverage of women on Wikipedia, but not at the expense of watering down notability requirements concerning 's. A |criteria is:  |"reliable, |independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy", as well as "Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are appropriate to the claims made." That is where just listing "plenty of sources" can end up  being |citation overkill. The numerous sources just do not tip the scales of notability. Working with another Timur Selçuk|individual with questionalble notability is not a factor. Giving the article time to grow would be a good argument but in this case that would include giving notability time to grow which apparently hasn't happened in "Decades
— User:Otr500, 18:06, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:SOURCE||WP:RS||WP:independent||WP:citation overkill (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)