Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skeptic's Annotated Bible (2nd nomination)
because of newly added sources. and '''merge''' to Biblical criticism which seems to be a good home for this. Allegations that !voting to "keep" are based on  don't hold water for me: I'd not visited the website until now. But a cursory check to the article showed sources added and 600,000 + g hits so it has some notabilty, in my view
— User:Truthkeeper88, 22:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)