Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INTP
and clean up. Not |hopeless. Passes : the basic info is cited using |reliable sources, though the uncited |original research and/or |copyright violations certainly need to be removed. Needing clean up is not a criterion for Afd, nor is "pseudoscience". And to the nom, having an MBTI box on one's page doesn't automatically indicate that someone commenting here is using  as an argument. Only the comments on this page should be taken into account
— User:Katr67, 16:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:HOPELESS||WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:COPYVIO||WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)