Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alanna Devine
My initial research shows Devine has been recognized as an expert by multiple independent and reliable sources over time, e.g. https://montrealgazette.com/news/a-reputation-for-cruelty ''Montreal Gazette'' 2009, https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/stricter-animal-welfare-laws-in-quebec-can-t-come-soon-enough-1.701801 ''CTV News'' 2011, https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/horrific-conditions-at-quebec-fur-farm-spca-1.1959940 ''CTV News'' 2014, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/quebec-bill-calls-animals-sentient-beings-and-includes-jail-time-for-cruelty/article24832028/ ''The Globe and Mail'' 2015, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37526015 ''BBC News'' 2016, https://globalnews.ca/news/2493805/verdun-woman-furious-over-slow-raccoon-rescue/ ''Global News'' 2016, https://globalnews.ca/news/3101348/montreal-pit-bull-ban-quebec-court-of-appeal-reinstates-bylaw/ ''Global News'' 2016, so there appears to be sufficient coverage of Devine as an expert per , i.e. "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability" and the essay , which reasons, "An independent interviewer represents the "world at large" giving attention to the subject, and as such, interviews as a whole contribute to the basic concept of notability," and "The material provided by the interviewee may be ... secondary, if the interviewee is recognized as an expert on the subject being reported
— User:Beccaynr, 15:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:INTERVIEW (Wikipedia:Notability)