Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divergent (book)
Sure it's a new book, and the article is badly written (not encyclopedic), and the author is an . But take a look at the references! It has been reviewed by the http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/15/books/review/young-adult-books-divergent-by-veronica-roth.html New York Times and the http://www.guardian.co.uk/childrens-books-site/2011/oct/10/divergent-veronica-roth-review?newsfeed=true Guardian. (Oops, the Guardian removed that review as plagiarism. http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jun/16/removed-divergent-veronica-roth-review) Not to mention http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20484977,00.html Entertainment Weekly. Seems like some reliable sources have taken notice. Not bad for a first book, and one in the often-underreported Young Adult genre
— User:MelanieN, 23:07, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)