Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrCAD
A misnomination per . The quality of the article in the current shape can certainly be improved (it has many gaps of information which need to be filled and various loose ends fixed, in particular after a huge section discussing parts of the company history has been deleted recently without consent after it has been a stable part of the article for half a decade). However, that doesn't even sligthly affect the notability of the topic OrCAD "as is", which has been one of the truely professional and traditional EDA CAD tools for decades. As an encyclopedia, we obviously need an article about it - actually, the question is more, if one article is sufficient or if we should have separate articles about the company and products like OrCAD or PSpice. (At the present stage, I would prefer one combined article with sections split out when enough stuff has accumulated, but others seem to prefer to split out an article about the company even now
— User:Matthiaspaul, 06:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)