Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Rotolo (2nd nomination)
I don't even think you need to redirect this.  See , , , .  This woman had sex with a royal and had a child out of wedlock.  There was a scandal, but it's settled now, with little fallout to the Prince.  She is not notable b/c she had sex with a royal.  She is not notable because of the scandal, which was one event, which is now settled.  Notability is not temporary, but the previous arguments seem to speak otherwise. Should she be mentioned in the article?  Yes.  Should there even be a redirect?  I say no, based on the above
— User:Roodog2k, 15:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NTEMP||WP:1E||WP:NOTSCANDAL (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)