Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Lodge
and/or merge to Castleknock). The nominator should probably take a look at the policy they are proposing under. However, in terms of NN (and  in particular), any searches for material and references suggest that the principal meaning/use of the term "Laurel Lodge" is in relation to the parish in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin. Rather than the housing development/former manor house estate. And, as mentioned by others, this topic (the parish) is already covered in the St Thomas the Apostle parish, Laurel Lodge article. Otherwise, in terms of , as a "populated place without legal recognition", I am not seeing anything which indicates that there is "non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources". Where this is the case, the information on this type of place "should be included in the more general article on the legally recognized populated place or administrative subdivision that contains it". In this case this would mean covering the topic in the Castleknock article. If the content is merged there, I'm not sure we need a redirect. As, frankly, I just don't see how a housing estate (however large) needs its own article or title. I have not been able to fully follow the wall-of-text above. But I note what appear to be  and similar arguments
— User:Guliolopez, 16:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GEOLAND||WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Notability)