Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Zhongjun Cao
to Murder of Dr Zhongjun Cao. Yeah, with the current article name this is a BLP1E case, but that problem would be easily cured by a move to a different title. The real question is if the underlying event (the murder, the trials and subsequent political fallout) is sufficiently notable and whether it gets over the #NEWS bar. It seems to me that in this case the answer to the last question is "yes", even if not overwhelmingly so. There has been a fair amount of newscoverage of the case in the Australian national (and not just local) media, as a googlenews search shows. Moreover, crucially, this coverage was not limited to the time of the murder but extended over a significant period of time afterwards: from some articles in January 2008 (e.g. http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/01/26/1201157739191.htmlhttp://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/story/54130http://news.smh.com.au/police-identify-attack-victim/20080124-1nys.html) and through 2009 (e.g. http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,27574,24995765-2862,00.htmlhttp://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25921041-2862,00.htmlhttp://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25902095-2862,00.htmlhttp://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23153658-2862,00.html).  There has also been some international coverage, in India (e.g.http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mistaken-for-an-indian-chinese-killed-in-au/495793/) and, apparently, in China. Overall seems enough to me to overcome the #NEWS bar. The article needs some clean-up though
— User:Kinoq, 18:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)