Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Martin (academic)
It's now clear, from an objective standpoint, that Martin passes the notability test based on the criteria of , which says that "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." Criteria 5 is: "The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon)." Martin holds a named chair at a highly-regarded university, so he's notable. The CMU announcement is a reliable source per the notability guidelines, and it was also published in the http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/ae/art-architecture/art-notes-high-heat-fails-to-burn-out-heritage-festival-fans-644160/ Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.   --Special:Contributions/76.189.114.163|76.189.114.163
— [[User talk:76.189.114.163|talk]]), 00:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)