Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal status of Sealand
Normally, I'm not one to nitpick, but  is an essay. In no way is it a policy, it merely reflects the opinions of its authors. Also, I don't recall anyone saying that this article was indiscriminate information. I think it's unnecessary, but not indiscriminate. It definitely deals with Sealand. I just think that anything Sealand can be covered in one article
— User:Cyrus, 01:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PAPER (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)