Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave
if there is nothing to '''Merge''' to Papal conclave, 2013 - I don't think it's an  argument to point out that we don't have such lists for almost all other conclaves, though for some (like those in the 16th and 17th centuries) there would be plenty of source material with which to start them. In almost every case, such speculation is included (post election) in the article for the relevant conclave. I see no reason why it shouldn't be so in this case
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 00:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)