Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energetically modified cement (2nd nomination)
and severely admonish or block Jono2013. His misbehavior made me come into this AfD with a predisposition towards deleting the article. But my standard for articles on research topics is , that they must be the subject of multiple reliable independent publications. Most of the EMC publications in Google scholar involve a group centered around V. Ronin, but there are enough that don't such as http://www.aycrete.com/pdf's/phd_conf_wienna.pdf this one to convince me that this topic is sufficiently notable. On the other hand, I think far too much of the article is promotional in nature (stressing the benefits of this technology and downplaying its deficiencies) and based on primary sources (Ronin-co-authored publications) and that it should be cut back to what can be verified through independent sources only
— User:David, 23:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)