Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technocracy Study Course (2nd nomination)
see below -- , , and arguably  from admission linked here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Skipsievert&diff=prev&oldid=236113985, etc, delete, unless a proper justification can be given beyond a generic  in which case merge. As the editor inserted him/herself into this discussion by free will, I'd say that  with association to editor would allow the edit archive links given be used for an evaluation of the overall topic. An explanation of edits done to hide discussion of own NPOV issues in articles and break AfD discussion standards is needed or the COI is blatant. If an article is truly written to just, proper standards and the editor has nothing to hide from then it should speak for itself and the editor would never need to speak on its behalf in defense, which is why I can't say it should be kept. Even a merged article would probably need a rewrite to avoid any later need for debate on similar grounds as this
— User:Datheisen, 00:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:NPOV||WP:SPS||WP:N||WP:RRULE (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)