Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Schlund (3rd nomination)
Meets  as "the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject".  couldn't be clearer about not using the word "vanity" as it is considered "accusatory and discouraging" as well as "not helpful, nor reason to delete an article
— User:Shunpiker, 05:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)