Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuroepistemology
A neologism it is not; the term is used in the book http://books.google.com/books?id=r0Bf3lLys6AC&dq=%22neuroepistemology%22&source=gbs_navlinks_s Philosophy of the Brain: The Brain Problem, in the title of a book http://books.google.com/books/about/Neuroepistemology.html?id=5xJPLwEACAAJ Neuroepistemology: What the Neurons Knowledge Tries to Tell Us, and in the title of an article http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-170582003.html Neuro-epistemology: a post-modernist analysis of the neuro-sciences.The topic has been researched by Patricia Churchland, a prominent scholar (past president of the American Philosophical Association) in the philosophy of mind, e.g., the secondary source http://sciconrev.org/2004/03/brain-wise/ An interview with Patricia Smith Churchland and the peer reviewed paper http://www.amacad.org/publications/winter2004/churchland.pdf How do neurons know?. Given the books, the peer-reviewed article and the interview all from a 10 minute search, this topic looks notable to me. It is true that the article has much original synthesis of disparate references, but this is a matter of editing cleanup and AfD is not for article cleanup (see  for details). The article thus should be kept. '''Update:''' Given
— User:Colonel, 17:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTFORCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)