Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David DeAngelo (second nomination)
I wouldn't question that DeAngelo is notable within the seduction community; he clearly is.  That's not the question here, though.  The questions are whether he's notable enough for his own article, and whether there is enough material extant to write a biographical article which can pass  and . After digging through all the links, I'm willing to grant the former, sort of.  The Orlando Sentinel article, along with a couple other passing references, is enough to establish that he's been regarded as an expert on seduction outside the seduction community.  His case for notability is not as rock-solid as all the other persons on the list of "Notable members of the seduction community," all of whom have been the subject of reliable articles, but hey, some articles are harder to source than others.  If the only question was one of notability, I'd change my vote. It's the latter question that I'm stuck on.  Is David DeAngelo ''really'' a pseudonym?  I'm quite sure it is.  But where's the published biography?  Is Eben Pagan his real name?  Does he actually have a doctorate?  What's it in?  According to , we could not even assert that David DeAngelo is a pseudonym unless we had a reliable source.  What needs to be remembered here is that the article in question is '''biographical''', which means there are policies which ''must'' be followed
— User:ObtuseAngle, 23:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:BLP||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Attribution)