Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreqTweak
C'mon, people, the requirement for |notability is well known. Significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. I'm less than amused by downloading megabytes of PDF file only to discover the program mentioned ''once'' in a "we ran it" sort of off-handed way (that's the first English reference), or included in a long list at the very back of the conference proceedings (the second). The German reference is a single footnote which contains a bare URL, and the Chinese reference is an unpublished master's thesis. None of these constitute significant coverage. Suffice to say, this is abandonware from 5 years ago, which never even reached 1.0. Let's send this article to the Great Intertubes up in the Sky where it belongs
— User:RayAYang, 11:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)