Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INSZoom (2nd nomination)
Please carefully study the General Notability Guideline (), which expects ''"significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"''.  Essentially all the sources cited so far are reprints of press releases, which are explicitly listed as a kind of source that is '''''not''''' considered independent for purposes of satisfying the GNG.  The fact that a press release has been republished by a reliable news source is not enough to make it independent of the subject.  If INSZoom truly is as noteworthy as is being claimed, then there should be numerous independent sources discussing the company '''''without''''' basing their comments primarily or exclusively on the company's own self-promotional material.  Even assuming the editors writing here in favour of keeping this article were not sockpuppets, their arguments are not policy-based, because they are putting forward sources of a type not considered acceptable per the GNG.  —&nbsp
— User:Richwales, 16:07, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)