Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roebling (River Line station)
Regardless of whether this individual station or this set of stations will survive AfD or not, this begs the question of the generally accepted standard of notability for train stations. Some editors mentioned that all stations is notable as per common outcomes. I checked the  but could not find the indication to suggest that there is consensus about about rail stations. It further suggests to go to the  essay. It said, "It may be considered that if enough attributable information exists about a station or railway line to write a full and comprehensive article about it, it may make sense for the subject to have its own article." That does not say about train stations are presumed to be notable. Also in the Train project page notability /MOS|essay, it has a very high bar for the infrastructure and buildings (stations included) such that one has to reach the historical status. It also refers back to  for the ongoing discussion about the notability. Therefore, there is no clear consensus or clear common outcomes in term of the stations. At the very least, if there is a commonly accepted standard developed by consensus to deviate from the GNG, that should be documented as such at the essay level, or at the  guideline level. If there is no consensus on that yet, the topic of station notability should be specifically discussed, perhaps Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Manual of style|there
— User:Z22, 16:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RAILOUTCOMES||WP:STATION||WP:TWP||WP:GEOFEAT (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)