Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Codd
Aside from the fact that the content is so obviously and overtly promotional, the subject does not meet  or . On the latter, the subject has never held national or similar office (only very recently being elected to a local council). On the former, the only coverage of the subject is the run-of-the-mill coverage about his candidacy in the pending general election. The only material coverage is the relatively limited coverage that is already linked in the article. (Much of which, frankly, appears to have been copy/pasted into Wikipedia without consideration to  or  guidelines. To the extent that, in honesty, this could likely have been speedy deleted under  (as unambiguous promotion) or  (as clear copyvio of the few local news pieces upon which it is based
— User:Guliolopez, 23:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:COPYVIO||WP:CLOP||WP:G11||WP:G12 (Wikipedia:Notability)