Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factual dispute
basically what I see here is a tautological statement (as pointed out by aeropagitica) and then it veers off into a catch-all, apparently trying to explain different kinds of factual disputes and why some cannot be solved.  The first sentence is a dicdef and the rest is an essay of sorts. No |verification from |reliable sources.  It looks to me like an original research essay... I'm willing to reconsider though if someone advances a good argument why this article should stay
— User:Isotope23, 12:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)