Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Server 2012 R2
Let's analyse this for a second. Claiming that this will definitely be notable now is a violation of CRYSTAL. Stating that it will definitely be significantly independent of the original version is a violation of CRYSTAL. Stating that it should be kept in a standalone article because of Windows Server 2008 R2 is a violation of . However, it is confirmed, so, at least for now, it should have a place in the main WS2012 article. This will negate any need for original research or speculative content (note: I'm not saying those should be happening) whilst still being encyclopedic. If it turns out that 2012 R2 is significantly independent, then we can always split it out later
— User:Lukeno94, 21:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)