Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Hackett
Redirect''' - First, let me point out something to the people voting that this is by consensus, not by !vote count. There could be 10 delete votes and 1 keep vote and the rationale from the keep vote could be enough to keep the article (or vice versa). With that in mind, I would suggest coming up with policy based reasons to support your !vote. For me, I do not see this persons being notable independent of the nonprofit group that he founded. The references in the article are about the organziation, not him, and only mention him as part of the organization. While there is  about the organization, there isn't any for him. I would consider them passing mentions and notability is not . Also, some of the sources are the same as they talk about a study released by the organization, but for notability they can only be counted 1 time as they are references about the same report. Looks like notability masking and as a stand alone article, there is not  in  to meet . As such, article fails general notability guidelines and should be deleted
— User:FoolMeOnce2Times, 17:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:INHERENT||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)