Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maia Weinstock
It cannot be excluded under  for 2 reasons.  The first is that  reads requires that 3 conditions be met, and the second is: "If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual." I assert that this young science write is unlikely to remain "low profile". I assert this with great confidence because this 2015 Supreme-Court-Lego media spike is the second such even in her career. The first was a burst of publicity around getting women better represented on WP in 2013. Both topics sparked media coverage not just in the U.S., but in the Eastern and southern hemispheres. In major news sources easily found by typing her name into a google news search.   http://www.news.com.au/technology/brown-universitys-anne-fausto-sterling-and-maia-weinstock-are-trying-to-solve-wikipedias-woman-problem/story-e6frfro0-1226741354147
— User:E, 20:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)