Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armando Lloréns-Sar
First of all, I don't see any evidence for any mob mentality in this discussion. Spend a few seconds reading  before you make slanderous remarks about the intentions of the editors here. Second, about Armando's intent to keep his identity private, I have never heard anyone else claim that Stanford University and NPR are obscure entities. Moreover, it seems to me that both sources were ''voluntary'' opportunities to speak publicly and seemingly Armando agreed to have his (semi-)full name ''and'' both his affiliations (attorney and blogger) be used to identify him for those occasions. So the alleged interest in his privacy seems to be a rather new thing, and I'm sure Armando understands the dynamics of the internet well enough to realize that if any information is posted on any website it is very much in the public domain. I was very sympathetic to proposals to keep his full name out of the public domain before, but with the new evidence I fear it's an open and shut case
— User:Trialsanderrors, 01:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)