Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niwa Kawamoto
Oh no, I don't question the basic fact - indeed there are many Ghits for the basic fact - but there's no reason why this needs its own article if it's never going to be anything more than what it is now (and quite frankly, the unreferenced, original researchish material should be removed no matter what happens). There's no |verifiable information here that couldn't be included on Oldest validated person by year of birth or Oldest people. Precedent has been that without sources covering the individual, it belongs on a list. Cheers
— User:Canadian, 00:04, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)