Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Fonteno
Having a public building named after him is not an instant inclusion freebie that would exempt a local political figure from having to demonstrate his notability in the same way as any other local political figure: receiving significant coverage that expands ''beyond'' the local media market where such coverage is merely ''expected'' to ''always'' exist. At a guess, a very large percentage everybody who's ever served on a municipal or county council anywhere at all has had something in their town or city (a street, a building, a park, a new housing subdivision, etc.) named after them. And since the naming of post offices in the United States ''always'' has to be handled by an act of Congress, the fact that such an act was passed does not speak to Fonteno having achieved more nationalized notability than everybody else Congress has ever named a post office after. So we can only evaluate this in terms of whether he gets over  #2 on the sourcing or not — but by far the majority of them are |primary sources that do not count as support for notability at all, and the few that are actually reliable sources are merely the expected level of local coverage, which means the answer to that question is no
— User:Bearcat, 17:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Notability)