Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Graham McKenzie
Firstly, the claim that the RfC had a consensus to cover all cricket articles is a complete lie, the closing administrator noted that "here's no consensus here that they should universally be included. Nor is there a clear consensus that such sections should be removed from all cricketer articles". Secondly, I simply don't believe that there is no source that would compile his five wicket hauls together, but the obvious solution is to merge the list of five wicket hauls to Graham McKenzie. A valid |alternative to deletion that is not inappropriate. The sourcing is entirely fine for an article outside of a list. Deletion is a poor and lazy option here and editors need to find other solutions rather than just nominating the article for deletion.The nominator has a clear bias against particular cricket articles and needs to stop nominating them for deletion when a clear alternative exists and they are '''required''' to consider those before deleting
— User:Deus, 12:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)