Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of giant animals in fiction (2nd nomination)
per , which states that "merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia."  Is a list of animals that are "large" in size in ''all of fiction'' really discriminate and focused as a topic?  I'd be more inclined to see this as a category than a list article.  The subject is not focused enough to ever be truly complete, nor could it be developed into a list article of any level of quality until parameters on what is "giant" are set - and given that fictional universes don't have data for the most part, that would mean using  to do so.  This just screams problematic all over
— User:Red, 00:31, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)