Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branch Insurance
or ''Draftify'' as per ATD. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is  and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short,  requires multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc, so "articles" which simply parrot a company announcement without adding independent opinion or analysis fails ORGIND. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Also, the excuse that it passes AfC is not a good reason to Keep as I see a lot of articles get approved from AfC where the references fail the criteria for establishing notability. I've no issues with the article being Draftified is the author is confident references can be found although my search has yielded nothing. As it stands, topic fails GNG/
— User:HighKing, 21:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)