Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Achom (2nd nomination)
Noting that the notability is very marginal indeed, and that per  and the fact that the person desires deletion, ties go in favour of deletion.  Being listed as one of the 100 most powerful businessmen of African or Caribbean origin in the UK Powerlist is not, IMO, a "notable award" at all.   Nor is being in the list of '''1000 most powerful Londoners'''  a "notable award."   That list includes Bip Ling, Simon Hammerstein, Matt Hermer, Nick Jones, Piers Adam, Nick House, Charlie Gilkes, Duncan Stirling and a host of other "luminaries".  It is not a "notable award" by any stretch of the imagination.     A majority, as far as I can tell, of the "news sources" are actually simple "press releases" and, as such, far down the totem pole of Wikipedia.   SPS press releases do not establish notability.   Lists of thousands of non-notable people are ''not'' "notable awards" at all.  And the "repeated coverage" is non-existent. For example the http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/10/hot-spot-the-scotch/?_r=1  New York Times cite has ZERO mention of Achom.  Yet is one of the "reliable sources" averred to exist. It is about "The Scotch" and not about Achom, does not mention Achom, does not imply that Achom is notable, and is a clear case of adding purely tangential "sources" to a BLP devoid of actual sources. http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/freddie-achom-joins-the-board-of-vivid-technologies-as-nonexecutive-chairman-428277.php is a press release. http://www.virginmediabusiness.co.uk/VOOM/news/AppyParking-scoops-1m-investment-/ is a press release. In fact, almost every source for his business is - a press release, or barely rewritten press release. Delete it
— User:Collect, 16:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)