Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ars Disputandi
per DGG. Included in major databse in the field. However, I would like to make one comment: I agree that the article could be expanded with, say, the three most-cited articles it has published, because we have objective criteria for that # of citations). A list of notable authors, unless we can find a |reliable source discussing authors in this journal (small chance...) would just be some editor's opinion of who are the most notable authors here and be inadmissible OR. I also maintain that the WorldCat counts are rather meaningless for an OA journal, as explained above
— User:Randykitty, 22:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)