Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Lindgren
Does not pass . http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3A%22Carl+E+Lindgren%22 Citation impact seems to be minimal, and primarily related to obscure patents (if these are not false positives). WorldCat returns a few books by C. E. Lindgren, including books on aura theories that would probably fall under . These may be false positives, but even if they are not they fall short of indicating notability. The most widely held book is in only 36 libraries worldwide. The memberships do not seem to be in societies that would qualify under  criterion #3. For notability to be asserted under this criterion, the level of prestige of the societies must be comparable to, for example, the United States National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society
— User:Eric, 20:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)