Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicity Jurd
the problem is that there are no references that are ''at once'' both independent and in-depth.  That is, all of the in-depth references are written by the subject and/or official representatives there of (that is, personal website, press releases, etc.) OR they are extremely trivial in nature (that is, where her name may be mentioned, but where her life and work is not discussed explicitly in the sort of detail that  requires).  Having a bunch of press clippings which name her various jobs, coupled with self-published autobiographical information, does not really meet  standards.  What is needed is sources which simultaneously very in-depth AND which have no personal affiliation to the subject
— User:Jayron32, 16:31, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)