Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of Hightower
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS But I did quickly run through the SCA article's sources and seen enough third-party reliable sources to establish the notability of the organization. I also know that there has been plenty of press coverage that are not listed as sources to know that SCA is notable. I can't say the same for KoH. As for overturning the results of a deletion discussion, there is |deletion review. But you have to explain why the closing did not reflect consensus, there were serious procedural errors, or present new sources that would have changed the outcome of the discussion if the deletion was based on a lack of notability. But beyond that there is no "higher authority
— User:TheFarix, 21:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DRV (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)