Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extravagance
It is our |policy to keep short articles with potential - they are called |stubs.  Our |dictionary policy explains at length that shortness is not proper grounds for considering an article to be a dictionary definition.  And, as for TPH's extravagant claim that the article cannot possibly be improved, please don't get me started.  The rest is the |argument to avoid of 
— User:Colonel, 19:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IMPERFECT||WP:STUB||WP:DICDEF||WP:ATA||WP:NOEFFORT (Wikipedia:Editing policy)