Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Rydell
3 minor roles and a Dateline interview fails .http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0753074/filmotype Being part of 1998 Playboy pictorial "The Babes Of Baywatch" does not impart any notability, and it has been decided elsewhere that being a Playboy Playmate is not in itself notable. Further, I can find no verifiability of article's claim that she is an "Independent TV/Movie Producer", and so she fails . She has some sourcability and mention for her being one of many falling for con man Christophe Rocancourt,http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20133133,00.htmlhttp://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/l-amerique-attend-l-escroc-des-stars-16-06-2002-2003167091.phphttp://www.google.com/search?q=%22Rhonda%20Rydell%22%2C%20Rocancourt&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=409563l412672l0l412844l12l11l0l10l0l0l235l235l2-1l1l0&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=nphttp://www.newspusher.com/EN/post/1220544662-1/exclusive-the-playboy-playmate-rhonda-rydell-and-conman-christophe-rocancourt-in-west-hollywood.htmlhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26669502/ns/dateline_nbc/t/catch-him-if-you-can/ which could, at most, be mentioned in his article, but there is no merit in listing all those that fell for this con man. Pretty much, if it were not for |involvement with Rocancourt, she would never have received coverage by media
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 23:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ENT||WP:FILMMAKER||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)