Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC on FX: Belfort vs. Bisping
Regarding |lasting effect, the specific text says ''"It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable."'' As thus, an event that is not at least several months old should not be eligible for deletion on those grounds according to that criteria. Furthermore "primary" sources is only listed in  in the context that ''" Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories. Wikipedia does not constitute a primary source."'' That is entirely inapplicable here. Furthermore the only section that appears to be potentially applicable in  is section 2, ''News Reports'', but it specifically makes a contrast to Wikinews which is literally emulating a newspaper and reporting on things daily. Adding information to an event article as more information emerges over a period of months is quite different from creating entirely new articles for each new piece of information. As such per the text of  I do not see how  applies here as a criteria for deletion either
— User:Beansy, 14:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:EFFECT||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER (Wikipedia:Notability)