Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThoughtAudio
Since the article's nomination, the reflist has grown from 3 items to 11. Yes it is a small-ish website with only 94 audiobooks but I must disagree with other editors who say that it fails . NWEB does not require a website to be "important" nor does it require a website to be famous. The only requirement is that the website is "noticed" and mentioned in other independent sources in a non-trivial manner. While it is debatable what qualifies as a "non-trivial" mention, it is undeniable that the website is mentioned in multiple independent sources (https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ThoughtAudio.com%22 5,800 google results... remember, the website is small, and has only 94 books so most of these are not itself). Also, this website is a not-for profit (its only products are offered for free); it's not the type of website that self-promotes or advertises. While the above !voters may argue that mentions such as "ThoughtAudio has classic works of literature and philosophy books available for download as free audio books" are trivial, considering what ThoughtAudio is, such a mention is actually appropriate... and I can't really imagine any other way this type of website is going to be mentioned... it's just not the type of thing that is going to win a prestigious award because no such awards exist.  Looking at the Special:Contributions/ELApro|contribution history of the editor who created this article, it is clear that he is independent of the website and that this article is not an advertisement
— User:Codehydro, 13:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NWEB (Wikipedia:Notability)