Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol Black
The potential for notability here depends on  for his work as a professor, not on  for being a city councillor in a small city, but the academic work is sitting on |primary sources — the |reliable sources are supporting the city council, his non-winning federal candidacy and a summary of general political views that we don't care about for a politician who hasn't held a notable office. As well, by and large those sources aren't ''about'' him in the manner necessary to clear , but merely namecheck his existence as a provider of soundbite in an article whose ''subject'' is something or someone ''else'' (and/or where he's the ''author'' of the content.) None of this is enough to deem him more notable than the norm for city councillors, and none of it supports notability as an academic at all
— User:Bearcat, 17:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)