Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Level of support for evolution
I commented early on in this AfD, and I've been reading the comments since.  I've read the article, and I do not see how any objective reader can conceive that the article is pro-creationism.  Now, it is true that (as I mentioned up above) some POV statements need to be removed.  The last "delete" vote had a point regarding the ending sentence... I don't think it was necessary, and certainly added nothing of value to the objective data.  Nevertheless, that is a problem for cleanup, not scrapping the entire entry.  The votes for delete have largely consisted of "#I_don.27t_like_it|I don't like it" comments (if any justification is included at all), and one #What_about_article_x.3F|scorched earth statement.  I don't know about the (apparently intricate) edit wars that have attended this and similar articles, but coming into the arena fresh I don't see any good reason provided for deleting this one, and lots of valid data that justifies its retention. And further, reporting on other people's POV from verifiable sources is not, itself, POV; especially if the ''topic itself'' is about viewpoints
— User:Zahakiel, 17:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)