Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tod Wall
Actually a month rather than a week, as the start date is given as February 20 and the end date is given as ''March'' 27. But as much as we try to maintain articles about state-level cabinet officeholders, it's still a matter of whether they have |reliable source coverage ''about'' their work in that role or not. If an article's most informative possible source is the subject's own LinkedIn, because there's no ''substantive'' coverage ''about'' him to be found, then we can't deem him an automatic keep just because his existence gets glancingly namechecked at the very end of one news article about his predecessor. People are not exempted from having to pass  just because they ''technically'' held an -passing position for a couple of weeks — even for an "inherently" notable position, a person ''still'' has to be ''sourceable'' to some evidence of ''media'' coverage ''about'' them. The ''sourceability'' is what ''makes'' the role an "inherently" notable one, and a person still ''loses'' the "inherence" of the position's notability if the sourceability isn't ''actually'' there
— User:Bearcat, 02:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)