Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/$pread
nomination doesn't give any genuine policy reason for deletion. You could argue the Washington Post article was a violation of  using this nonsensical argument. The magazine has won an award, which is usually considered good enough. Regarding Tainter's good faith comments, I would comment that google doesn't handle searches involving $ characters particularly well
— User:Addhoc, 11:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPAM (Wikipedia:Spam)