Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) (3rd nomination)
It's tricky, but I don't think this is a POV fork, mostly on the grounds that the subject matter can (admittedly with difficulty) be covered in a NPOV way the same way it can be in an article. In fact, I think a good portion of the article already covers the criticisms decently: saying exactly what each side stated while generally avoiding most |words to avoid and withholding |synthesized judgment. You could  go through any of the material within this article and see that it would also fit in the main Bill O'Reilly article, so it's really more of a plain-old split than a POV fork. POV forks are only articles composed of material that is so inherently POV'd that it couldn't withstand to be within the main article. Perhaps you are worried that readers will get the idea that Bill O'Reilly is highly controversial and heavily criticized, but that is verifiably and undeniably true. I am ambivalent about the name-change idea to "Controversy of", but it doesn't sound like a bad idea. &ndash
— User:DroEsperanto, 04:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WTA||WP:SYNTHESIS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)