Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-universality in computation
Most of the delete arguments above seem to rely on a novel interpretation of "independent sources." First, the subject is not the author, and second, the references in question seem to have been published by reliable third parties with editorial and/or peer review. The fact that the same author appears on them only means caution must be used, per . (Note to closing admin, please review relevant policy and discount any arguments made contrary to policy). I don't know if this theory is true or not, and neither do the others making arguments that it is not, which is  anyway. We don't allow inclusion of OR in WP, and we shouldn't allow exclusion based on OR either. Even if a counter-proof was published in a reliable source, we would simply merge that into this article, give each appropriate weight per , and let the reader decide: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth", per: . There seems to have been a productive discussion on the talk page for this article, and the normal editing process should be followed, with the history preserved. Move any unsupported controversial material to the talk page, and work out a reasonable compromise
— User:Dhaluza, 00:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPS||WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)