Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiquote (2nd nomination)
Already keep voting above but responding to relisters comments).  When nominating per  there is onus on the nom. to try to improve the article first and if that fails, if the article has noteability issues, to tag the article for improvement per  C#3 or otherwise notify parties for improvement and this does not seem to have been done.  This is necessary to give goodly time for improvement and helps prevent hasty and rushed comments by at least one idiot.  The nom in the nomination rightly and correctly identified one suitable source, now articled, (Buscaldi et al, 2007) ''Some Experiments in Humour Recognition Using the Italian Wikiquote Collection'' at the International Workshop on Fuzzy Logic and Applications conference.  (DeVinney, 2007) was a dead link and not recovery at nom. time in the article, I have recovered same and it seems most suitable for the keep.  The fact it was used in Italian  curriculum ( Ministero dell'istruzione, dell'università e della ricerca, 2018) seems persuasive, the ZIP download reference is a tad of an issue and I have personally not opened it.  Thankyou
— User:Djm, 13:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)