Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Maier
I removed the offending links from the page a few days ago (and promptly forgot about the AFD)... Well, the inline citations prove the subject is who he's stated to be. I think a "keep" is borderline-reasonable given the referencing.Re: the nomination statement - the fact the citations were not inline at the time is not a reason for deletion (see  and I've yet to see evidence this is a vanity article
— User:Suriel1981, 19:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SOFIXIT (Wikipedia:Be bold)