Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motor control in humans
This article has many issues, is too essay-like and too unfocused.  But it is certainly not |original research.  The article creator has less than 10 edits.  His user page indicates that he is a last year undergrad at a tech institution.  All signs of good faith, but also unfamiliarity with Wikipedia.  The preferred action here is to try to recruit the guy, not  him.  First, he should familiarize himself with existing articles - starting at :Category:Motor control - maybe he can improve some of those articles of which many at present seem to be in a bad shape.  Second, I have a feeling that his real interests (I'm assuming a male here) lie within the field of Computational motor control - this is presently a redlink, but seems to be highly notable.  A pruned version of this article might fit under that heading.  A basic search in Wikipeia suggests that he would first have to consult Cognitive science#Computational modeling, Brain#Computation, perhaps Computational neuroethology, perhaps Cerebellum#Motor coordination and Kurt Thoroughman plus++.  So I would say '''userfy and a friendly notice''' encouraging him to contribute.  Although I'm way outside my comfort zone (and short on time), I would be willing to take that task and try to coach him. The tendency around here seems to boot everything that is less than perfect for deletion, sort of a Pavlovian response mechanism - it's not particularly constructive nor nuanced, it disregards  and more importantly the very fundamental way in which Wikipedia grows and exists in the first place. After all, we are here to build an encyclopedia, not delete it.  If everybody can agree on this outcome, I would ask Joe to withdraw, I will then userfy etc
— User:Power, 13:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:BITE||WP:IMPERFECT (Wikipedia:No original research)