Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Safran
There is a plausible notability claim here that might get him an article if he could be |properly sourced as clearing  for it, but nothing that's "inherently" notable enough to ''exempt'' him from having to clear GNG just because he exists — but the referencing here is parked on |primary sources like pieces of his own writing, photographs and the |self-published websites of organizations he was directly affiliated with, with no evidence of |reliable source coverage about him in media that would count as valid support for notability. Also this was created by a banned sockpuppet, so even if his notability ''could'' be properly demonstrated by the correct kind of sources, it would still need to be deleted and then recreated from scratch anyway
— User:Bearcat, 18:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)