Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conectiva
The 'research' mentioned above does not discuss how significant the coverage of the company is in detail, but gives the impression it simply confirms the company was mentioned in passing for its business as usual/press release type activity. Nothing presented so far suggests it would pass . PS. I did, in fact, look at the first book source, https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=5CsFGUtF2eYC&lpg=PP1&dq=Linux%20Patch%20Management%3A%20Keeping%20Linux%20Systems%20Up%20to%20Date&pg=PA151#v=onepage&q=Conectiva&f=false, which mentions the company several times, but in passing. The book does not discuss the company, just talks a bit about the product (code) it produced. If this represents the best sources we have, this is very much a failure
— User:Piotrus, 12:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NORG (Wikipedia:Notability)