Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language)
For the sake of Straw_man#Steelmanning|steelmanning, I'll point out that https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/1/11/%D9%81%D9%89-25-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84-%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86/2532713#.Vxg2-tQrLIU this article in Youm7 could be argued to constitute . But I'm still inclined to delete for a few reasons: a)  says that "multiple sources are generally expected", and I can't find any other reliable secondary sources covering this topic b) I don't think this Youm7 article/interview is particularly reliable for establishing the notability of the programming language itself. It's as much about the interviewee (Fayed) as the language. And if this were a notable programming language, I would expect coverage in RS that cover technology/computer science. c) The interview (in Jan 2016) talks about the language as something newly announced which is about to be published. So  and  come into play. ''Update'' {{no ping|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated}} has shrewdly observed below that the author of the Youm7 articles (Hany Salah) is http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html listed as a member of Ring's 'marketing' team. I withdraw my steelman - there's nothing approaching reliable, ''independent'' coverage of this language out there
— User:Colin, 15:49, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:CRYSTALBALL (Wikipedia:Notability)