Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candice Kumai
u|Jerem43}}, a "critical review" does not have to be a scholarly treatment of the subject. Reviews in the NY Times for example, are acceptable. Reviews in the news, magazines or journals are hardly "routine": only books that receive significant attention for various reasons are reviewed--I know: I'm a librarian. BTW, the term "critical attention" is not mentioned once on otability, nor is it specifically defined in AUTHOR, leaving it to the AfD participants to weigh and evaluate the info provided. Anyway, that's a little off-topic, but I think important to clarify. The subject of this article passes GNG for coverage under reliable sources which I added to the article
— User:Megalibrarygirl, 16:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NAUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)