Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakhill Christian School
WP:NPASR&nbsp; #1: "the nominator...fails to advance an argument for deletion".&nbsp; XfD is not an RfC biased with a !vote to delete and without an argument for deletion.&nbsp; WP:POINT: Nominator stipulates in the nomination that the topic is notable, and then !votes to delete.&nbsp; Stating that this is somehow procedural has no standing, the nom is still a !vote to delete.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 00:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SK (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)