Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Engineering
I can't find any evidence of notability, as defined in .  This guideline requires "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" and my search doesn't return anything that could be considered "significant".  The article has been significantly culled and its difficult to determine from the article, as it stands, why it should be included in the encyclopedia.  That the article is a stub doesn't, of course, make the subject non-notable, but it does make it hard to research notability when the article makes no mention of the company's achievements, structure or history.  To have any chance of surviving the debate, the article would have to very quickly be enhanced with information supported by the reliable, independent secondary sources
— User:Wikipeterproject, 21:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)