Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research and Analysis Wing activities in Pakistan
Agree with nominator that this is a . The article only focuses on a single viewpoint of RAW involvement, in spite of many refs giving substantial weight to opinions that accusations have been made to cover-up internal issues. (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32604137, http://www.wsj.com/articles/pakistan-is-pressed-over-dual-track-terror-strategy-1470938346, https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=e-vBAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29&dq=Russia,+India+and+UAE+involved+in+Baloch+insurgency&source=bl&ots=QYbAloUU1q&sig=v2MQXq9fnm8cdCQs-QtzABrccGM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiw6MW3_sXZAhUIORQKHTAyAEoQ6AEIhQEwDQ#v=onepage&q=Russia,+India+and+UAE+involved+in+Baloch+insurgency&f=false, https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09KARACHI398_a.html). A substantial part of article is either a list of accusations or statements of Indian involvement in general rather than RAW specifically. There are also multiple sourcing issues in the article including statement contradicted by reference placed near it (https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/how-best-can-india-play-the-balochistan-card-against-pakistan/story-vOq6IkRKSdlzgGYKkI7pjK.html), op-ed used as a ref (https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/afghanistan-pakistan-and-the-f-16-mattis-has-to-hardsell-these-issues-on-his-visit-to-india/story-qvL9NS6wgl17sy756hE2WN.html), news reports on other reports used to artificially inflate ref count (https://nation.com.pk/24-Sep-2017/ttp-is-an-active-indian-card-in-pakistan-and-afghanistan-hindustan-times reports on https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/afghanistan-pakistan-and-the-f-16-mattis-has-to-hardsell-these-issues-on-his-visit-to-india/story-qvL9NS6wgl17sy756hE2WN.html, https://tribune.com.pk/story/545058/sarabjit-singh-was-a-raw-agent-indian-report/ reports on https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi-news/was-sarabjit-singh-a-raw-agent/story-62qEnuOGe1fXFSckX7ovfN.html), usage of opinions from fringe theorists (http://foreignpolicynews.org/2015/05/29/terrorism-deception-and-india/ from a 9/11 truther) and using WikiLeaks ref to cite an unreliable website (https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/63/63956_india-intel-research-.html originally from http://www.faqs.org/espionage/Gu-In/India-Intelligence-and-Security.html). The remaining well-sourced content can added to Research and Analysis Wing article
— User:Gazoth, 07:43, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:Content forking)