Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natter Social Network (2nd nomination)
Natter misses the mark for notability. 2 of the 3 references are unreliable (Career addict is an unreviewed blog platform and techspark is a volunteer joornalism site) the only reliable secondary source is a BBC story. I am going to propose that when  calls for '''''significant''''' coverage it doesn't mean a single story. Per  I would recommend listing this in a directory wiki such as wikicompany.org not an encyclopedia. Per , Wikipedia isn't made for things that are just cooked up. If natter takes off and becomes a notable thing then we can write an article on it, but it is missing the mark for notability
— User:Bryce, 13:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ALTERNATIVE||WP:ONEDAY (Wikipedia:Notability)