Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Cofnas
The argument that Cofnas is a notable academic is very weak. The only evidence given for his notability is two articles he wrote that attracted attention in large part because of their low quality. The first was (according to Steven Pinker) a poorly argued  a partial added later critique of MacDonald, and the second was a defense of fringe views on race. The resignation of the editor of ''Philosophical Psychology'' resulted from a dispute with other editors about whether or not to publish a submission strongly criticizing the journal for publishing Cofnas' low-quality and inflammatory article. So Cofnas was only indirectly involved in that. It is unclear if the resignation of the editor is noteworthy or is just a transient event, but in either case his resignation does not establish Cofnas' {{tq|enduring notability}} per 
— User:NightHeron, 22:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)