Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laughing Jackal
per : "''Note that a specific product or service may be notable on its own, without the company providing it being notable in its own right. In this case, an article on the product may be appropriate, and notability of the company itself is not inherited as a result.''" and  as I don't feel the references provided describe '''the company itself''' in enough depth. I do recognise the creator's ongoing work and believe this company could in future become notable so I suggest |userfying the article to the creator's namespace so that work can be continued and if/when the company can be demonstrated to clearly meet / the article can be recreated. This is a borderline case, IMHO, which is why I suggest this
— User:Suriel1981, 16:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRODUCT||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:USERFY||WP:CORP||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)