Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnosticism in popular culture (2nd nomination)
The nomination rationale is bankrupt. Wikipedia rules that tell us that articles that can be improved, must be kept, are not temporary. There is no . I would say 'speedy keep' were it not for 10lb's rationale of OR, which has to be addressed, I guess. I mean, he has not done anything but assert it, so whatever. I (also?) occasionally return to the point of frustration past resignation, because of rubberstamped delete votes and nominations. As for improving the article, it is just as simple as picking a name for the list, putting it in Google Search with "gnosticism", and copying the URL. I found sources for all I have seen so far
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEADLINE (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)