Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars sequel trilogy
From : ''"It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects '''or''' whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced."'' It has enough references to pass both that, and . Even if it does have bits of trivia, it's sourced enough to not fail , and even if it were , it's not unreasonable to say that the Star Wars fan base is big enough that (contrary to the essay), content is of importance ''to a large'' population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. ''Update: I should probably point out that the main reason I'm opposed to just merging to Star Wars is because that article is too long as it is, and leaving this one separate makes it easier than merging and having to trim/fork off something else
— User:Khalfani_khaldun, 18:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL||WP:N||WP:OR||WP:FANCRUFT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)