Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallop
mdash; most big Microsoft systems are probably notable. Alexa ranking is not the be all and end all, Wallop meets  inclusion criteria in my opinion, with press references (such as http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,61095,00.html this from Wired, http://news.com.com/Microsoft+licenses+new+way+to+make+friends/2100-1032_3-6065115.html this from CNN, http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2154793/microsoft-wallops-social this from VNUnet and http://online.wsj.com/google_login.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB114601517162336033.html%3Fmod%3Dgooglenews_wsj this from the Wall Street Journal). It's only just (the press release was today, see news on http://www.wallop.com Wallop.com) properly launched as a spin-off company, Wallop Inc. following some time as a project in Microsoft Research, so is only likely to become more notable and well-known as time goes by, following the previous beta testing a proper launch is due later in 2006. I would agree that the article needs significant expansion and more of an assertion of notability, however
— User:UkPaolo, 11:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)