Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exopolitics (3rd nomination)
I have to acknowledge that there is a place in Wikipedia for the annotation of the existence of such beliefs, but that's a far cry from (a) explaining them in great detail, which leads to (b) their being lent a scrap of credence by being so annotated in an encyclopedia.  I think  comes into play here.  The more that a theory is -- let's call it "difficult to accept" -- the greater amount of proof and |verifiability by being considered |notable by |reliable sources ought to be present.  The germ of information that defines the word "exopolitics" has been completely obscured here by 
— User:Accounting4Taste, 16:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)