Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Group (2nd nomination)
The question in the original AfD was whether notability was established by the claims made in the article, whether those sources which meet  gave the subject non-trivial coverage, and whether the article was promotional in nature.Whether this meets the "sufficiently identical" test under  falls into the realm of admin discretion &ndash; some sources and phraseology differs, possibly enough that some would be uncomfortable to delete without discussion, but not to an extent that could possibly change the arguments at this AfD relative to the previous one. Which is surely the ''point'' of G4
— User:StillWaitingForConnection, 13:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:G4 (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)