Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard House
user|TonyTheTiger}} is correct but only if we assume that No Man Is an Island|each article is an island, which is something advocated for by .   is  and entirely gumpf.  Applied to reality as opposed to the aberrant fantasies of some Wikipedians, we can come to a better understanding.  This understanding is that the general consensus on this is that a page should actually exist.  Biographical details might be a bit thin on the ground, and if he wants his   that's fine; we include what we can . A decent "biographical" article without major biographical details can be written consisting of a bibliography and references to book reviews.  Some of the books themselves may also have articles.  The key is understanding that this won't be an article like William Shakespeare in style but more like Shakespeare's plays with the odd bit of biographical info thrown in
— User:Barney, 17:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTPOLICY||WP:BLP||WP:PRIVACY||WP:V (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)