Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in theoretical computer science
passes  with multiple reliable sources discussing substantial subsets of this list. I have no doubt that the Gödel prize which seems to be awarded for such lankmarks is a good source. Others have pointed out more that more extensive list exist in print. There is no requirement that a single source cover ''all'' the entries in this article. If this article simply copied such one source it would easily be a copyvio. The reason invoked for deletion is thus invalid, and I have little faith in the search abilities of the nominator who has posted identical reasons for deleting other similar lists, nominations which were closed as  keep. The talk about impossibility of an objective criteria that others have raised is solipsism. We include stuff in Wikipedia precisely because some author decide to write about it, whether he is "objective" (according to what standard?) or not
— User:Have, 21:46, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Notability)