Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual personal names (5th nomination)
The list is well sourced and there are numerous substantial works upon this topic such as ''The Guinness book of names'', ''Personal names and naming: an annotated bibliography'', ''A history of British surnames‎'', ''American given names: their origin and history in the context of the English language'', and so on.  As naming is the subject of such study and scholarship, we are able to rely upon this to establish whether a name is unusual or not and so we're good.  The nomination seems vexatious per  as it offers no new argument that has not been considered and rejected before.  Raising this matter at this special time of the year with no trace of a new argument seems to be |disruption contrary to , "''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hopes of getting a different outcome
— User:Colonel, 07:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:BLOCK||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)