Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mainstream films with unsimulated sex (2nd nomination)
This is an embarrassment. Wikipedia is not a porn site. Is that a good enough reason? In WIkipedia, we have rules, like . It's just totally not a sensible place to be trying to maintain such a list. "I watched the film, and saw real sex" is NEVER going to be an admissable reason for including the film. And if the film really, obviously does include unsimulated sex, what does that mean? This list is doomed to be wrong, anyway! I have no qualms about porn as such; it's fine, this is the 21st century. It's just not encyclopaedia material. Please take this list elsewhere. Further, all the other "delete" reasons are very valid appeals to real Wikipedia policies (second Steve Dufour, The Four Deuces). Please respect the polices. Thanks
— User:Alexh19740110, 14:17, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)