Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Colbert at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner (2nd nomination)
The cited policies do not seem to apply; the speech in question seems to have risen above a temporary news item to the point where it was still receiving comment in major media sources six months later, so I don't see how #NEWS is relevant.   is only an essay, and cannot therefore be used by itself as grounds to delete an article (as it quite correctly notes itself). I fail to see how  is relevant in the slightest; this article clearly describes an event that was quite important, a comedy performance that has achieved critical acclaim.  In this regard it is no less discriminate than any other article on entertainment events.  This particular event has quite clearly received much discussion in the press, which is one of the measures we use to determine whether the inclusion of something is indiscriminate or not: describing something that is |notable is not considered indiscriminate; by the rules described at  there's a clear presumption of notability for this event.  Unless there's a good reason to consider those rules wrong in this case (and I don't see one in your deletion argument), I see no reason to delete the article.  Very few after-dinner speeches are notable, but this one seems to make the mark
— User:JulesH, 17:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:RECENTISM||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)