Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Pelennor Fields
WP:POINT nomination which stinks of  (look at the username) and seems to be targeted to ''the'' biggest battle of the Legendarium. CNN's coverage of the battle in an article about New Line also makes me lean more towards keep. The "reliable secondary sources" part of the notability guideline is easily met as ''The History of Middle-earth'' is a deeply analytical text. Yes, it was written by Chris Tolkein, because he has access to the source material - I doubt the Tolkein estate would release ''THoMe'' just to make a quick buck, so in my mind it passes the "independent of the subject
— User:Sceptre, 23:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WAX (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)