Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodson Law Office and Jones Law Office
I'm not taking any position on the question of the ''individual'' notability of the articles, as I haven't looked at it closely enough, but I think Dravecky has made an important point. I don't see that the content of the articles should be excluded from Wikipedia, so even if I wanted to support the AfD I should be saying "merge". But this isn't an encyclopedia which copes well with long pages, and our  policy doesn't seem to address the common need to have more pages than there are individual subjects of notability. If we haven't got it already, we need a better concept of what could be called ''marsupial notability'', connected to the multi-page structure which the nature of Wikipedia often calls for. But, not having looked at the particular question in enough detail, I don't say these articles could only rely on that
— User:Xn4, 13:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)