Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Ballard
The notability is at least questionable (and I'm inclined to agree with previous analyses by Lord Arador and SmartSE that argue he's not notable). I also find #G11 and  relevant - this isn't an encyclopedic article, it's a puff piece; the author of it
— User:Expewikiwriter, 23:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CSD||WP:NOTADVERT (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)