Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of living princes and princesses
primarily because I don't think a valid argument has been presented as to why the list should be deleted, and I can't think of a good reason to delete it.   is an essay and thus not a good reason for deletion, but this list seems to pass the criteria presented there anyway.  The list has a well defined scope, and the subject is neither too broad nor too narrow to be listed.  The list corresponds to a notable subject (that of prince|princes and princess|princesses), and the content is easily verifiable in reliable sources.  There are no concerns about neutrality, original research, or any of the other potential problems with lists mentioned at .  The other stated reason for deletion, , has absolutely no relation to this list.  It certainly isn't a plot summary, lyrics database, listing of statistics, or software update log.  I also don't think you can say the topic just isn't encyclopedic, as people with princely titles seems like the sort of thing you would expect a broad encyclopedia to cover (many of them are individually notable, and those that aren't would generally be expected to be mentioned somewhere, such as in the articles on their parents).  I just don't see any good reason why this list should be deleted
— User:Calathan, 19:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Listcruft)