Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Jewish control of the media
The topic is probably encyclopedic.  However, this article suffers from flaws so broadly fundamental that |blowing it up is the better solution.  JFW's desire to draw attention to the evidence Mathsci presented at Arbitration is appropriate.  There is every reason to consider this article equally suspect.  Again, a fundamental problem with the article is that scholarly sources exist which would provide a broad, reasoned, long-term view of the topic.  However, this article is, in the main, not constructed from such sources.  This is especially profound in the "Analysis and Commentary" section, which provides little or nothing in the terms of broad, long-view analysis.  Rather it is an isolated series of observations, mostly consisting of headcounts of Jews in certain positions, patchworked together in the place of actual commentary.  Furthermore, these observations (as with the article in general) are divorced from anything resembling a chronological examination (1999 statements by the ADL are sandwiched between 1936 and 1941 observations), and are often from sources that, although reliable in the Wikipedia sense (''Slate'', ''Midstream''), are ill-equipped to provide "analysis" of the topic.  Consider as well that Foxman's book is given probably undue weight as a subtopic in and of itself, but is nevertheless cited as a reference elsewhere in the article.  Even if there is no misrepresentation of the material claims in any of the sources used, this style of reference selection, in the context of an article of this nature, advances an inherent POV, a POV that ArbCom has already ruled against by sanctioning one of the primary editors involved
— User:Serpent, 20:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)