Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educational Demonstration
That is an interesting template you have used alongside my name.  {{tl|vandal}} has connotations of objectional conduct and is highly inappropriate to a deletion discussion. If you have something to say to assert and verify the notability of the article, then go ahead and say it. If you can improve the article to make it of sufficient quality to avoid deletion then do that. But do not spend your time and energy on people instead of the primary task which is to create a proper encyclopaedia. Please read .  Note that the person closing this discussion will read the article with care, will look at the references, and will take arguments about policy into full consideration, but will ignore personal remarks and rhetoric. Please put useful comments here based upon notability, verifiability and other aspects that will demonstrate to the community that the article should remain here. Please add relevant references to the article to demonstrate not only the notability of the topic but also the notability of the term, and use |reliable sources. Also read the policy about |assuming good faith where your fellow editors are concerned
— User:Timtrent, 08:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:RS||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)