Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptocurrency (2nd nomination)
If cryptocurrency is a notable topic itself, there is no reason not to create a breakout article from the original digital currency; cryptocurrency is a kind of digital currency, but it is not a synonym of digital currency. Cryptocurrencies are distributed and anonymous, whereas digital currencies like Zen or Linden dollars are based on a central issuer. The article has reliable sources like Technology Review and Ars Technica and a quick Google News search reveals articles at http://news.cnet.com/8301-31322_3-57581952-256/heres-why-bitcoin-is-the-future-of-money/ CNET and the http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/28/feds-shut-down-payment-network-liberty-reserve-is-bitcoin-next/ Washington Post. GScholar shows multiple peer-reviewed articles on cryptocurrency.  Multiple independent reliable sources show that the topic is notable per . The article is new and short, but already has some good sources and shows no major problems. A notable topic and an article with no major problems suggests keeping the article
— User:Mark, 01:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)