Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgetown Bagelry
Utter spam. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Reader's polls on "best bagel" are mentions-in-passing and fail . Someone mentioned above that the coverage about the owner's book but misses the point that none of the information is therefore Independent Content and fails . Topic fails GNG/
— User:HighKing, 18:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)