Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl necklace (sexuality) (3rd nomination)
There are sufficient references for notability and although the border between dictionary definitions and encyclopedic articles may be fuzzy at times, this one seems to be sufficiently on the encyclopedic side to merit keeping. The argument to delete based on potential trivia magnetism is not policy based and should have absolutely no bearing on the close. Frankly, I think an appropriate amount of popular culture references enhances the value of an article, places the subject in a cultural context, and is a necessary and important service to our readers. I agree that the article does need work, but we fix problems with articles (other than intrinsic non-notability) by improvement, rather than deletion, per 
— User:Becksguy, 15:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)