Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Current Affairs (Event Planning and Production Company)
it is spammy, but |several of the sources look reliable - in particular the ''business journals'', which are syndicated and well-known.  It seems, therefore,  to be |barely notable.  I am leaning towards a keep, but the "puffery|peacock language" has to go
— User:Bearian, 16:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:BARE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)