Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Witter
The extent of the promotionalism problem in this article is enormous, and the material not based on reliable secondary sources needs to be drastically cut back. (Maybe I'll feel bold here shortly and do it myself.) Further, I don't think it's anybody's obligation to go back and fill in what will then be a nearly empty entry with neutral, properly sourced material, unless some editor really want to. But all that said. I do not believe COI is sufficient reason to delete an entry if reliable sources could validate notability: I'll note that for instance,  warns if you put up a post about yourself--a clear conflict--and "you do turn out to be notable, you must expect the article to stay." Seems pretty clear that COI does not automatically override notability. And on the notability front, I think this subject meets  #3, possibly  as well (I didn't look super closely because I was satisfied with AUTHOR
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUTOBIO||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Autobiography)