Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nomophobia (2nd nomination)
Fundamentally,  trumps every other policy and guideline.  Are there a powerful lot of mainstream media sources describing this in significant detail?  Yes.  Done deal.  Whether this is a legitimate psychological syndrome or not is not only irrelevant, but almost certainly beyond our professional qualifications and competence to judge.  I'm also completely unimpressed with "seems to be have been created ... as part of a PR exercise"  Either it has been - and the nom has credible evidence of this - or no credible evidence is available, and that's irrelevant too. (Come to that, what does it matter if it has?  The bar is still not whether it's a promotional stunt or not, but whether it meets .  It does
— User:Ravenswing, 20:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)