Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Lindsay (second nomination)
and merge pertinent facts into Mormon apologetics. With all due deference to those who did a great job of cutting the vanity from this article, it still fails key thresholds in WP policy. Absent |reliable outside sources the subject is simply someone who is vocal on his webpage and on discussion groups but with zero news hits (even Utah or Wisconsin local news) simply lacks the outside standing of a Phillip E. Johnson to be the public face of the apologist position in this debate. The litmus test for an entry like this is whether we can include a properly sourced and attributed criticism of his position. If not, we can either include hearsay and run afoul of  or we leave it out and make this a |POV fork, giving undue weight to one side of the debate. To be clear, the debate is important and should be properly covered, but we cannot bestow notability to a partisan figure who has not received any attention outside the world he is active in
— User:Trialsanderrors, 18:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:BLP||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)