Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim White (2nd nomination)
First and foremost, there is absolutely nothing in WP guidelines that says local coverage is unacceptable. Specifically, the guidelines say the sources determine whether or not a subject is notable. If local sources repeatedly cover her in pieces such as http://www.chattanoogan.com/2015/8/6/305697/River-City-Company-s-Kim-White-Says.aspx this, she is notable to Chattanooga. But apparently  wasn't done, as there are more than local sources. She has been covered in an article by http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2009-08-14/chattanooga-reinvents-its-downtownbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice Bloomberg Business, was a featured speaker for http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/Now-What-...In-the-Life-of-Our TEDxTalks event, was one of the women's profiles of http://www.cityscopemag.com/women-for-the-city/ CitiScope Magazine and been covered on news affiliates for http://newschannel9.com/news/local/making-the-heart-of-chattanooga-more-vibrant ABC and http://www.wdef.com/news/story/Chattanooga-Bank-Buildings-Becoming-Apartments/GDd5d0kbhU2TT6JbRQ-SRg.cspx?rss=3457 CBS. Meets GNG with significant coverage over time in multiple independent sources
— User:SusunW, 18:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)