Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kept Man
Wikipedia is not .  seems to be in play here. I would agree that the plot summaries are overlong, and the articles do seem to be short of secondary sources. But given time - this may improve, after all wikipedia wasn't built in a day. Per above the show seems notable
— User:Megapixie, 02:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PAPER||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)