Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Fefferman
per Frank, above. Obvious and strong notability. There are years of coverage of this person in hundreds of  of all kinds. In several cases he '''is''', indeed, the subject of such coverage (random example http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rRMRAAAAIBAJ&sjid=LuADAAAAIBAJ&pg=5054,1158886&dq=dan+fefferman&hl=en, but by no far the only one), and the fact that http://books.google.com/books?pz=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=dan%20fefferman&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np numerous books treat the subject is even more compelling. That we currently don't have sources on his wife or place of birth is irrelevant: we simply won't include such data, and it's fine. NPOV problems can be dealt with editing, per  policy
— User:Cyclopia, 16:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)