Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pig slaughter
I also wanted to mention that there are two big problems with the article, that virtually requires it be deleted. The article is unsourced, but quite lengthy. There isn't a little bit of  that went into it. There is a lot. That means that what would be done (should it be kept), is to attempt to find sources to justify the . This means that, if it is kept, it cannot be given proper weight. We're looking to justify the content already there, rather than looking for what content actually belongs there. It would be quite disturbing, to me, for us to go that route. The alternative, is the second problem. Suppose we keep the article, and simply remove the . As I pointed out earlier, that's the entire article. If we keep it, our options are to either 1) lower our standards, and settle on a biased article, or 2) blank the page, which amounts to deleting it, and start again.  Once you take out the , there is NO page. That, alone, should be enough to have people rethinking their position. Most of the arguments on here come down to 
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORIGINAL||WP:ORIGINAL||WP:ORIGINAL||WP:ORIGINAL||WP:MUSTBESOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)