Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedman (unit) (2nd nomination)
This article is a valued resource for those who come across the use of the term.  It is an article "about the concept that the title denotes" in accord with .  Also, according to that guideline, "note that dictionary and encyclopedia articles do not differ simply on grounds of length."  Croctotheface has proposed the article for merge, and now twice has nominated for deletion - all in good faith, of course.  I hope that when this latest attempt is rebuffed, he will finally be content that the article will stay, and will work instead to improve the article, as it is is in accord with both the spirit and practice of Wikipedia principles.  Notability has been established through thousands of mentions on blogs and several mentions in the print Washington Post and Editor & Publisher.  One wonders if, in this technological age, whether we truly want to establish the idea that something must be printed on tree material to appear on a wholly online source ("let alone significant one such as a book").  The absurdity of this position is rather startling, and I would submit against the founding principles of Wikipedia
— User:Arjunasbow, 19:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)