Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek 2 (2013 film)
or with good faith '''Incubate''' or '''Userfy'''. While the sub-SNG  is sometimes seen to conflict with policy , the policy itself '''does''' allow properly sourced discussion of events that have not yet occured... even planned films. And as long as we have proper sourcing, we can find always find place for contextual information, even if not in a separate article. I believe that at a minimum, we can allow the article to be userfied or incubated out of respect to NFF and the willingness shown by editors to continue improving the article. After which we can then without prejudice set a redirect of the title to a parent topic elsewhere where the unmade film might be discussed in context to the film franchise... such as either the suggested Star Trek (film series)#Reboot or at Star Trek (film series)#Films and allow its return to mainspace when principal filmming is more imminent. Seems a reasonable compromise that meets both policy and guideline without rewriting either or bending either into pretzels. Looks like we'll have a very short wait
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 05:39, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFF||WP:FUTURE (Wikipedia:Notability)