Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undisker
Web search doesn't bring up ''even one'' instance of independent coverage of this product in the first hundred hits.  (What it does bring up is loads of SEO and |endless reprints of trivially-reworded material from the official site, which is only relevant to anything in that it makes me want to stop looking.)  Every last google books hit consists of "product name product url price" in lists of similar software&mdash;the very model of |insignificant coverage.  The article itself was apparently written by the software's author and, while it reproduces the software's release history in excruciating and unverifiable detail, fails even to say ''what the program does''.  Heck, rm (Unix)|rm and Notepad (Windows)|Notepad "work with disk images" too. &mdash
— User:Korath, 02:49, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPIP||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)