Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bantha (2nd nomination)
When I saw the AFD I assumed this article would be all plot summary, as is usually the case in situations like this, but not only is it from a real-world perspective, it is cited by |verifiable |secondary |reliable sources, which speak to the subject's |notability. I also suspect the article could be expanded upon and fleshed out further, so I think it's worth keeping. It's also worth pointing out there was a previous AFD for this subject that resulted in a keep after the article was revised to reflect its notability and a |consensus was reached to keep it, and although that certainly doesn't mean we can't discuss this again in AFD, I'll just note that OTTEMPORARY|notability is not temporary, so if the subject was notable back then, it's still notable now
— User:Hunter, 14:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:SECONDARY||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:NOTTEMPORARY (Wikipedia:Verifiability)