Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in networks and security
Before stating one or two reasons that comply with our rules and regulations, let me state the main reason for me: (I am aware of .) It is an incredibly useful list. To me, it is so useful that it is the only article I watchlisted primarily in order to be informed of new developments, not in order to edit it. Apart from that, it is possible to reference those claims one by one because every once in a while an academic paper states that certain works are "important" or "groundbreaking". I am not sure such references would improve the readability of this list, but if they are required to fulfill  they can certainly be found. So if there is a problem at all, this can be solved by editing, rather than deleting. Geometry guy also makes excellent remarks http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_important_publications_in_mathematics&curid=33269547&diff=453602133&oldid=453556809 here
— User:Pgallert, 06:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:USEFUL||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)