Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (5th nomination)
Clearly in violation of basic NPOV policies, and could never be brought within them in anything like its current form. An appalling article, probably the worst thing Wikipedia's made. It's had several AfDs which were closed as No Consensus in the hopes that it might be fixable; this only resulted in the ers chasing off anyone who was trying to suggest changes, by insisting on endless bureaucracy before any changes. Everyone knows this is a problem article, no reasonable person thinks, after 4 AfDs, that the people who have claimed ership will ever allow it to be brought in line with policy unless it's deleted. It's a Quotefarm, meant to push a signgle sifde of the devbate, by presenting arguments from one side in EXTREME detail, while forbidding the other side a response, because it's supposedly "just documenting views". And this is not going to change; it's been in this state since before the first AfD, and is only getting worse as time goes on. When an article violates basic Wikipedia policy - NPOV is one of the |five pillars - and its very nature means that it can ''never'' be brought into line with this fundamental Wikipedia policy without throwing everything out and starting over, it '''must''' be gotten rid of
— User:86, 00:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OWN||WP:OWN||WP:5P (Wikipedia:Ownership of content)