Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phati'tude Literary Magazine
There's nothing out there to suggest that this magazine is notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. The magazine exists, but |existing does not give notability on Wikipedia. There doesn't seem to have ever been any true in-depth coverage of the magazine, nor does it appear to be indexed anywhere that would give |notability on here. The article claims that it's won an award, however awards aren't something that automatically give notability on Wikipedia - you first have to show that the award is a notable one. I honestly can't find any record of the magazine winning an award and it's not named on the article or on the magazine website, so I have to assume that it's something that Wikipedia would consider non-notable. As far as the association with notable people goes, notability is  by having an association with notable persons. I looked the magazine up in Ulrichsweb and found nothing to establish notability there either. The majority of places that mention this magazine are typically  or they're in places that Wikipedia would not consider a , like a self-published website and the type. That this is ''also'' one of several very promotional articles written by people who appear to have a strong COI is also a concern in this situation. Since this is already at AfD I'd recommend this just running the course because if this is deleted, this will help prevent recreation, whereas a deletion for G11 would not prevent this at this point in time. I'd recommend against any merging or redirecting at this point in time given that most of the articles relating to IAAS are up for deletion in some form or fashion. If any survive deletion then a redirect could be discussed then, but not before that point in time
— User:Tokyogirl79, 01:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ITEXISTS||WP:NJOURNAL||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:PRIMARY||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)