Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Rabinowitz
I've removed the vast majority of them and here's why: while Rabinowitz is either mentioned or makes a statement in many, ultimately they are all just trivial mentions. He's quoted or mentioned, but very briefly and he is not the focus of any of those articles. I wouldn't even say that he's the focus of the sources I left on the article. I'll do a search, but so far I'm leaning towards deletion myself. I just wanted to state for any incoming editors that the previous sources did not show notability. They establish that he's an expert, but being an expert isn't notability in and of itself. As far as the original editor goes that added all of the citation spam, trivial sources do not show notability and  can actually discredit an article faster than a lack of citations would
— User:Tokyogirl79, 05:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:REFBLOAT (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)