Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meredith Jones (author)
Being quoted a couple of times in relation to what seems like a tabloid story-of-the-day and a http://cmc-centre.com/kardashian/ one-day symposium publicity stunt in the wake of Jenner's gender transformation, does not equate to "substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity". Read Jones' damage control in the  https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/jan/14/whats-wrong-with-studying-the-kardashians Guardian article and she even points out that the whole thing "came under attack, especially on Twitter and other online forums". Note that no one is quoting Jones anytime in 2016-2019 about the Kardashians. No way does that support a claim to #C7 (the "Neil deGrasse Tyson" rule). Does not satisfy  due to writing only one book, and a few articles promoting said publicity stunt. Other books have her in the role of editor, and not even top-billing.  Gotta ask why the two "academics" voting above me are trying to  this one
— User:Netoholic, 21:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:MASK (Wikipedia:Notability)