Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Hoyt
WP:SNOW|what is all this white fluffy stuff?) easily meets  and  as brought out by above editors, another waste of time for afd editors, how many times does it have to be said - |article content does not determine notability, it really  doesn't matter how badly written an article is, if the subject is notable, then, they're notable, i note that even prior to the article being prodded, it stated that Hoyt has won the Prometheus Award (PA) -  (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sarah_Hoyt&type=revision&diff=900557117&oldid=897528971 see here), this alone means that she meets , so if the nominator had been bothered to going to the PA article they would have seen her name there, not only as a winner but also as a finalist on multiple occasions, as for this afd being reinstated by {{u|Bbb23}} (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FSarah_Hoyt&type=revision&diff=907550271&oldid=907536326 see here) (after being non-admin closed by {{u|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz}} (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sarah_Hoyt&diff=prev&oldid=907536326 see here)) with the comment "you cannot do that", um yes they can, having a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How an AfD discussion is closed and , this is almost a text book case of an afd being closed early ie. editor is experienced, uninvolved, registered; and the outcome at the time was a slamdunk "keep" (4 of the 6 editors specified "keep", the other 2 while not specifying "keep" testified to Hoyt's notability
— User:Coolabahapple, 02:40, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:ARTN||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NACD (Wikipedia:Notability)