Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristi Yamaoka (fourth nomination)
No compliment was intended or justified. The problem is that "We have a clear policy here, and it's not being adhered to." The problem is that the policy in question is   and you refuse to abide by it.  requires you to obey precedent, and lays out a procedure for those too stubborn to accept it: '''"An editor who thinks that a consensual decision is outdated may ask about it on the relevant talk page, at the |Village Pump, or through a |Request for Comment to see whether other editors agree. No one editor can unilaterally declare that consensus has changed."''' Yet you have refused to follow this part of the policy, as well. You have ignored consensus not once, but a second time. You have shown that you refuse to respect precedent as part of your |ignore all rules crusade, firmly sticking your thumb in the eye of two clear agreements that this article stays as is. If this is a lousy article improve it. If you can't come up with a clear explanation for why  should be ignored, it's time to walk away from this article
— User:Alansohn, 18:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CONSENSUS||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:VP||WP:RFC||WP:IAR||WP:CONSENSUS (Wikipedia:Consensus)