Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General list of masonic Grand Lodges
I wouldn't classify it as "indiscriminate information". Right off the bat, it ''tries'' to keep out "clandestine" by ''at least attempting to use'' "descending from the United Grand Lodge of England". I would hope if you have access to a Grand Lodge-issued List of Recognized Lodges, you may consider Cite'ing it as a source. "unwieldy and useless"? No, I dont believe editors will let it remain unwieldy for long, I can forsee where breaking it into several 'country' related sub-Articles would solve any of thoes concerns. Who is considering it |useless??? I am willing to admit it does need work, the original :fr:Liste d'obédiences maçonniques|French version shows how much TLC work this article needs
— User:Exit2DOS2000, 06:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:USELESS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)