Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberBerkut
for the modicum of coverage, but there seems to be some  going on here.  It doesn't look as though anything will save the Background, Goals and Symbols sections of the article, unless the suppositions there can be tied to reliable sources. Several of the websites used for the ''news'' do not appear to meet the reliability requirements, such as the anyone edit pastebin.com, jeffreycarr.blogspot.com and news.softpedia.com (although the article by Oana Lungescu reposted by Eduard Kovacs seems legit).  The editors would be better off citing the UPI and ''The Guardian'' which had similar articles
— User:Bejnar, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)