Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free energy suppression
It's a widespread and notable conspiracy theory; there are books and movies published on it, and a community of supporters.  Whether it's true or complete bollocks is irrelevant with regard to keeping the article; the nominator appears to misunderstand this point.  He states: "An article about something that doesn't exist..." and "...fine intention to give counter-evidence...".  There are plenty of valid and needed articles about Unicorn|things that don't exist.  Also, articles on Wikipedia are not intended to give evidence or counter-evidence; #SOAP|Wikipedia is not a soapbox.  The article presents encyclopedic information about a notable social phenomenon.  Yes, the information is sketchy; but that's grounds for improving the article, not trashing it
— User:Freederick, 17:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)