Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wifey's World (3rd nomination)
It seems like there are a plethora of articles from |reliable sources that haven't been used in the article yet. Among them (including those currently in the article): http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/1998/09/14784  http://www.azcentral.com/community/scottsdale/articles/1104sr-pornography1104insideZ8.html http://tucsoncitizen.com/morgue/2006/11/06/31612-plan-for-porn-web-site-in-scottsdale-under-fire/ http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/1107necoalition1107.html http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/1104porn1104.html http://www.salon.com/2002/06/19/semen/ http://business.avn.com/articles/video/Face-to-Face-The-Husband-Wife-Team-Behind-CumOnDagny-com-39003.html http://business.avn.com/articles/video/Doubt-Cast-on-Anti-Porn-Coalition-28946.html http://business.avn.com/articles/video/AVNONLINE-ON-THE-RISE-200606-RealityWife-com-49443.html. I suppose that one could make an argument that a number of these sources are passing mentions, but ''Wired''{{'}}s profile of the site along with the plethora of other mentions mean that a quality article could easily be written if an editor put their mind to it. From reading the articles, this site appears to have been a leader (the first off the boat as it were) in amateur pornography
— User:Nomader, 15:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)