Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actualidades
the threshold for Wikipedia notability is not existence, but ''significant coverage in |reliable sources that are independent of the subject''. The ''Hispania'' review is a start, as it is a third party source that is reliable. However, the coverage must also be non-trivial; that is, a mere ''appearance'' is not enough, which is a problem with the other sources provided. As mentioned above, the ACTFL link you provide is a list of links with a few brief sentence about this and about a dozen other topics (the same seems to be the case for the Cafe Pedagogique link). Likewise, the ''independent'' clause is important; looking at the FLAG website, the http://www.flageorgia.org/conference/2010Conference/2010ScheduleAtaGlance-MailoutFinal.pdf conference schedule would seem to indicate that you are the one who presented about it, and thus this does not help to establish notability; indeed, looking at your resume (which is freely available online; for privacy's sake I will not link to it here), you also were the presenter about this topic at the other conferences you mention, which is the same issue. (Using passive voice to say that it has "been the subject" of these presentations is somewhat misleading... being up front about things would be welcome here, please.) I would recommend looking at the links to  and , as well as , to see what kind of sourcing would be needed. The key is, as stated above, ''significant coverage in |reliable sources that are independent of the subject''. I hope this helps
— User:Kinu, 18:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:WEB||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)