Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FocalScope Email Ticketing Solution
barely. I continued MrX' good work in cleaning out promotional content from the article. It is now quite short. I looked hard for references beyond those in the article and found none. Borsen looks like a reliable source. Most of the article is behind a paywall, but from the initial paragraph, it is likely in depth. The AisaOne article reads like a press release, but the Channel NewsAsia article reads like a news article, with discussion of privacy concerns about the monitoring aspects of the software. From the http://www.channelnewsasia.com/about/ about page, Channel NewsAsia looks like a TV news channel. I could believe that it is an independent, reliable news source. So there seem to be two reliable sources with enough depth for the topic, making it barely above threshold for general notability . A barely notable topic with an article that has been mostly neutralized with respect to promotional content suggests that the article should be kept, barely
— User:Mark, 06:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)