Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adyen
per HighKing's excellent analysis of the sourcing, which I concur in, but I'll add additional reasons: the interview based sources are ''primary'' sourcing, which does not count towards the requirements of , also, this is actually one of the worst non-G11 eligible spam articles I've seen. It might as well be a case statement they provide to investors or a brochure for clients. It is excluded by OTSPAM from inclusion in Wikipedia (see , which means that even if it did meet the general notability guideline, it would not pass . In this case, it both fails the GNG and is spam
— User:TonyBallioni, 00:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOTSPAM||WP:DEL4||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)