Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of astronomy websites
At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universe Today (4th nomination), I wrote: I created the list by relying on Lists of websites and failed to take into consideration whether it violated  and . It is meant to complement :Category:Astronomy websites by including both notable astronomy websites and non-notable astronomy websites that have received tangential coverage in reliable sources. I think this is a good compromise position for this AfD: It dissuades users from Wikipedia:Bombardment|bombarding the article with poor sources, trivia, and fluff to create a façade of notability. Instead, at List of astronomy websites, the non-encyclopedic information can be removed in favor of retaining only a short encyclopedic summary of the website. Please do not withdraw that nomination. List articles are not my area of expertise, so perhaps an AfD can attract experienced users to refine the inclusion criteria of List of astronomy websites so that it does not violate  and . However, if, at the end of seven days, the list cannot be improved to satisfy the  and  policies, then it can be deleted and the discussion at this AfD can focus solely on whether Universe Today can be kept or deleted.I request that this AfD be relisted by the reviewing administrator after seven days have elapsed, so that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of astronomy websites can come to a conclusion before a decision is made here. I would like this article to be kept so the Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline-failing Universe Today can be merged into it. However, AfD positions should be motivated not by personal opinion but by policy-based arguments. Because I have little experience with regard to list articles, I will '''abstain''' from formally supporting retention but hope that more experienced editors can revise this article so it does not violate  and 
— User:Cunard, 18:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTDIR||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)