Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Lee Parrott
The case itself only returns 8 unique hits http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=10&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Hadaway+v.+Fowler-Dennard&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images, although charmingly, one from morons.org.  The judge, however, returns many more hits, a number from reliable news sources.  It isn't a strong one, but it certainly passes .  The thing is, this case isn't just A Random Case where there was, as there always is, some judge who passed judgment.  The case revolves around the alleged bias and misjudgment of the judge himself, and its notability revolves around the judge rather than the citation line of the case itself
— User:RGTraynor, 18:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)