Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age of Worms Timeline
A quick |search engine test shows zero reliable sources. The article is referenced exclusively with |primary sources with no secondary sources. Since there are no #Reliable sources and notability|reliable third-party sources independent of the subject to presume |notability, I don't see a valid reason to keep the article. Furthermore, the subject of the article by itself does not meet the |general notability guideline. The content of the article is a |plot-only description of a fictional work with no real-world context, it's full of |original research and, as stated in the nomination, the article is an unnecessary |content fork, easily meeting the criteria of #REASON|reasons for deletion. Since the text is purely a plot-only description that relies on original research, I believe that nothing from this article is worth merging with Age of Worms
— User:Jfgslo, 20:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SET||WP:PRIMARY||WP:V||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:PLOT||WP:OR||WP:CFORK||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Search engine test)