Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inchrosil
That the article has severe COI and self-promotion troubles is obvious. However I'm not sure of the reason given for deletion. My question is: Has anybody looked at the references -the Spanish, first 11 ones? What do we know about their coverage? They could be well enough to pass , but it's hard to tell without looking them. (Also -incidentally- being a fringe theory is not reason for deletion: notable fringe theories are still notable
— User:Cyclopia, 00:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)