Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top 100 web sites in the United Kingdom
The original editor is starting to pull data from multiple sources and putting it together into one table. IMHO, this is heading towards one of Wikipedia's taboos - |no original research. |By gathering unlike data from multiple resources and combining the data within the Wikipedia article, the resulting table becomes unique, i.e. original research. If someone did the combining work outside of Wikipedia and Wikipedia references it as a source, then that would be okay. But it does not look like the progression of this article is heading in that direction. Wikipedia should not be used for conducting research on a subject that hasn't been explored elsewhere
— User:Groink, 21:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)