Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigid Maher
as any issues with the article's format or content can be dealt with through normal editing.  It would seem that the subject, even though seen as failing  or , could pass the |General Notability Guidelines http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2002&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22Brigid+Maher%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22Brigid+Maher%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go.  If enough independent reliable secondary sources discuss a topic in enough depth to put together a decent article, we'd better have a good reason to not have an article on that topic. In other words, "''A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.''"   explicitly includes and defers to the . In my opinion, the subject has enough significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, so that the article should be kept... cleaned up certainly... but kept
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 04:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)