Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of self-referential songs (4th nomination)
I am somewhat surprised by what I found in looking at the article; although footnotes to the places one plucked the quotes from would be better by way of , they can no doubt be found. I appreciate Mandsford's comment and where the actual words provide ambiguity, the reader can judge for himself or herself, unless es can be found to show the meaning one way or another.  This is done in numerous articles: virtually any exegetical one, those dealing with various any other written document (constitutions, treaties, books, novels), and yes, songs and films. So, that's no barrier to keeping it. But ultimately is this encyclopedic? It's a close call, but I will give it the benefit of that doubt
— User:Carlossuarez46, 06:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)