Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anouk Claes (2nd nomination)
I would only want to "see more" if it were not interviews, home page content, or other self-published sources. Regardless of all the wishes, the criteria for otability (people)|notability is evidenced by |significant coverage in |reliable and |independent sources. I just do not see the subject meeting the criteria for inclusion in a worldwide encyclopedia. "She not only talks to people, but also to coconuts and wine bottles.", and she also converses with "different detergents". I don't find this particularly interesting or intriguing but some may. It is not Wikipedia's goal to advance the strange paranormal or stranger para-abnormal. There has to be irrefutable sourcing per policies and guidelines. It is not our job to determine the truthfulness. When someone believes in the Bible they can believe that we can Mark 11|talk to a mountain (verse 23). Anything short of proper sourcing and Wikipedia is guilty of propagating WP:fringe theories|fringe theories
— User:Otr500, 17:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:IS (Wikipedia:Notability)