Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextiva (4th nomination)
I have been in this discussion about this subject before. These sources http://www.azcentral.com/story/money/business/tech/2016/04/15/nextiva-growing-rapidly/82514464/ this and https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/blog/techflash/2014/11/nextiva-named-fastest-growing-tech-firm-in-arizona.html this are definitely . Even though borderline this passes the  test. The article has been recreated twice via Drafts and it was approved by different AFC reviewers but one thing that stands out is it has been having the same AFD nominator 3 times even though mot consecutively. Referring to http://www.azcentral.com/story/money/business/tech/2016/04/15/nextiva-growing-rapidly/82514464/ link 1 and https://www.huffingtonpost.com/todd-vanduzer/nextcon-brings-the-silico_b_13074830.html link 2.  states; ''An independent interviewer represents the __world at large__ giving attention to the subject, and as such, interviews as a whole contribute to the basic concept of notability.'' and it also states; ''The material provided by the interviewee may be primary, if the interviewee is speaking about his own life, or may be secondary, if the interviewee is recognized as an expert on the subject being reported.'' While I think it is in order to write off what other language encyclopedia consider as matter of policy on inclusion of subjects yet all of them are working to consolidate information about notable subjects in the quest to create the sum of all human knowledge. Not unless ''sum of all human knowledge'' is supreme over all in some language(s). If anything they span off from English Wikipedia and the policies their might be better in a bid to improve coverage as DGG stated above. I have also seen an editor trash the revenue per year because this is a tech company – granted that might be the case but some companies say UBER (Taxi) had an article here when it could only raise USD 1.25M of seed capital while it was more of a unicorn and not really having any revenues. Not really citing  but just like law precedence is equally important when building solid foundations
— User:Kagundu, 12:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:INTERVIEW||WP:OTHER (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)