Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rantic
the nomination statement rather contradicts itself saying both that the article is promoting a company and that the company doesn't exist.  Um, that isn't possible - make up your mind as to your argument before making one...   As to notability, the company (or fake company) has been covered by ''numerous'' reliable sources (no one would debate this, I'd think).  Why it attracted such attention is pretty irrelevant - coverage, not importance, conveys notability.  Let's say the company is really the work of prolific hoaxsters (seems to be RS consensus).  So what?  Then it is a notable hoax instead of a notable company. Essentially this is an  nomination. The only real question is what to name the article - any of the various names used for the hoax should suffice, I'd think, but regardless that is not a question for AfD. Pinging {{ping|Kikichugirl}} who accepted this at AfC for input
— User:ThaddeusB, 20:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)