Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donofrio v. Wells
the article is a POV fork to start with (not to mention violating  and ). The article is a running political commentary dressed up in the form of a . South Park|Move away, there's nothing to see here. The assertion (unsupported by |reliable sources) of a person "spending ... millions of dollars" to prevent the State of Hawaii from releasing his birth records (which, under Hawaii state law, are '''public records''') does not add anything credible to this discussion in terms of Wikipedia policy and editorial guidelines. Again, the court case is dead - the same should be true of the tempest in a teapot that some people are trying to push as a "valid" article despite Wikipedia policies stated above
— User:B, 13:00, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)