Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2011 in the Libyan Civil War
Asd has been pointed out above, this so-called splitting because of "WP:SIZERULE" is a mere ruse. It was part of an elaborate and well thought out plan to make numerous changes in various palces to hide the true purpose, which was to conveniently lose elements that the editor did not like, and substitute versions more in keeping with that editor's point of view. There is no good reason for having a host of little articles. Fragmenting the account into little pieces about tiny fragments of the whole story is not helpful in any way. We don't have an article on April 1944 in World War 2. I note that, apart from the author, the only editor here in favour of keeping is Dennis Brown, who says "the event is obviously notable" (but that is about whether to keep the content, not about whether it should be fragmented into separate articles, which is essentially what is at issue here); "a timeline is certainly appropriate" (but nobody except the sockpuppet author has suggested deleting Timeline of the 2011 Libyan Civil War, and that suggestion was clearly a bad faith  nomination); "then merged if that is appropriate at that time" (but gives no reason why it isn't appropriate now); "Merge isn't a topic for AFD anyway" (yes it is
— User:JamesBWatson, 19:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)