Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House)
The arguments for retention made in the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hunting_(House)|previous AfD (that took place less than 5 months ago, and of which I wasn't previously aware) are still valid. I also can't see how deleting these articles would do anything to improve Wikipedia. When I asked Xeworlebi, he simply pointed me to various policies, but that doesn't answer the question. I agree that the articles are not great at the moment, but believe that even in their present condition, they're better than the proposed redirects. Instead of the deletionist method of pointing to WP:EPISODE, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:PLOT as if that provides some kind of inescapable logical conclusion, I'd point to  and . It doesn't make sense to claim that some episodes of a series are notable and others aren't based solely on what's been added to an article so far
— User:Rpeh, 14:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:COMMONSENSE (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)