Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Protocol (video game)
but '''cleanup''' – We got the Gamespy article as mentioned above. There is also an interview from IncGamers http://www.incgamers.com/Interviews/133/Beyond-Protocol-Interview here talking about the game. There is also a review from Bright Hub http://www.brighthub.com/video-games/pc/reviews/12984.aspx here; I'm not sure if the site itself is reliable, but the credentials of the person doing the review gives it a good sense of reliability. We also have something from Softpedia http://news.softpedia.com/news/Beyond-Protocol-Brings-Strategy-to-the-MMO-World-91548.shtml here. There are other entries out there, but I wouldn't consider them |reliable enough as far as |verifiability is concerned. I think it barely skimps past the notability requirements – multiple reliable, independent sources, and a couple of them provide some decent coverage of the game. Needs some major cleanup, however, to maintain a neutral encyclopedic tone. The behavioral conduct should be left as a separate issue to work out
— [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]], 00:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)