Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stubbs (cat)
on the merits, owing to obvious notability and depth of coverage, much of it contemporaneous and predating the subject's death. I'm loathe to bring up any point that might trigger , but the Delete arguments (and the nominator's rationale) remind me of His Royal Highness Emperor Norton|Norton I, Emperor of the United States. It doesn't matter one bit that Norton was emperor of nothing - he was noted as such, with varying levels of seriousness. In this case, it doesn't matter whether the cat was elected as mayor of anything - what matters is that he was noted as such in reliable sources
— User:Ultraexactzz, 13:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)