Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David L. Ganz
There are certainly potential notability claims here that could get him a Wikipedia article if he could be properly sourced over  for them, but there's nothing here that entitles him to an automatic inclusion freebie just because he exists. There's one short blurb about him, which is not substantive enough to carry a GNG pass as an article's ''only'' reliable source, but everything else is either a |primary source that cannot support notability in a Wikipedia article or an inherently unreliable source: Ancestry.com, his own staff profiles, the sales page of his book on an online bookstore, a review of his book on a non-notable blog, and another newspaper piece in which he's the ''author'', not the subject. This is not the kind of sourcing it takes to make a person notable enough for a Wikipedia article, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to hand him a free exemption from having to be referenced properly
— User:Bearcat, 18:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Notability)