Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Sawyer Jr.
paid TOU violation created by a CU confirmed sock that is obvious spam, so excluded by . The fact that this is paid and the subject is a young BLP makes deletion in this case even more of a good idea because of previous attempts we have had to blackmail the subjects of paid biographies (not this article, but others). Per my arguments in the last AfD: notability is also not established: most of the sourcing is trivial or local. Car crash articles do not establish notability, even if it is the Atlanta paper, because the Atlanta paper routinely covers car crashes. I don't think he's notable, but at most he is borderline, and given the paid concerns, deletion is the best outcome
— User:TonyBallioni, 01:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTSPAM (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)