Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People who menstruate
per , #ADVOACY, DICT.  If there's a trans-related article at which this phrase can be mentioned, and it can be reliably sourced as being in common enough usage and with enough independent, reliable sourcing material about it to write not-just-dictionary-definition (i.e., actually encyclopedic) material about it, then fine, but that doesn't require a merge.  There's nothing particularly special about the trivial amount of content presently in the page.  If someone thinks otherwise, they can always  the page to their draftspace and merge from it, if/when there's a good merge target.  I have no objection to draftifying, to serve as the first entry in a "Trans-inclusive language", or "Glossary of trans-related terms", or whatever it might be titled. But again, this is a trivial amount of content, and it need not be kept if there's not going to be a concerted effort to produce such an article
— User:SMcCandlish, 14:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK||WP:NOT||WP:NOTDICT||WP:REFUND (Wikipedia:Content forking)