Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunstone (medieval)
Is well-sourced and informative; I, also, don't see the phantom OR. There are referenes from multiple peer-reviewed journals; the possible  is alleviated by, as noted, the articles being peer-reviewed. I am also ''very'' disturbed by the addition of words, even parenthetically,  that are ''not'' in a policy to a quote from that policy to alter the policy's wording to support a deletion agenda
— User:The, 01:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)