Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Dong Silver (3rd nomination)
The only reason the 640 sources I found in a Google news search aren't being used is that someone, I really don't know who and don't care to check, had this article previously be an attack against Clarence Thomas, which was later removed. While the Clarence Thomas speech controversy is important to the subject, it has to be properly worded and used and not given too much  weight in the article. I'm thinking two sentences or so should be fine. Nonetheless, this porn actor is notable. The usual awards requirements don't really apply, as his major films that he acted in were before award ceremonies like AVN existed. So it makes things rather different. But, as the sources and other things show, this performer is notable
— User:Silver, 18:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)