Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FORDISC
I started looking for sources for this via Highbeam, which returned quite a few. Apart from those now referenced in the article, others were pointing towards the critical literature, which is also indicated in more detail in the two Google Books links provided by the nominator. In sum, though, these are indicative of notability; it strikes me that the main concern expressed in the nomination is a lack of |balance in the present text? In that case, the need is for either a competently-written and referenced Criticism section to be added to the article, or perhaps a less vendor-specific merge into :Forensic_anthropology#Application
— User:AllyD, 18:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: :WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)