Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straighterline
as per nom and . The article fails at   and  should probably really  have been up  for CSD at  A7, G11, or even both,  and appears to  have slipped through  the net. This is also very  possibly a  (single use account) for the purpose of advertising  the subject's product or service. Wikipedia is not  a directory (). The company  on  the author's own description, is a start-up and is therefore too new to  have accumulated an notability per  It's parent  organisation  will  also  shortly  be up for deletion  review. Referenced sources do  not  make notability, they  confirm it , if it  is already  there. - being  'popular' dos not  make the new kid on  the block  an encyclopedia candidate. Just  having  McGrawHIll  as a customer does not  make it  notable. AFAIK, the subject  does not  have a direct government accreditation, even if it  is 'partnered' with  some universities. Also  the article contravenes policy  by  listing  the courses it  provides. The world of distance and onine courses is a very  vague area
— User:Kudpung, 02:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPIP||WP:FAILN||WP:SPA||WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:Notability)