Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center (3rd)
That you were present and saw no evidence of controlled demoliton may, if citable, be a useful part of the article.  Additionally, the fact that you saw no evidence for it neither makes the article suitable for deletion nor for keeping.  It is a valid personal statement but not a valid reason to "vote" either way.  The article is not about whether the destructon had any elements of controlled demolition in it.  The article is about a hypothesis that some people have proposed to explain the demolition.  As one of the editors who have worked on the article I can state that I think the hypothesis is , but that does not prevent it from being notable.  The article is about a notable piece of what appears to be ludicrous folklore.  It does not express any opinions or conclusions about this hypothesis, it simply documents that it exists
— User:Timtrent, 07:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BALLS (Wikipedia:Complete bollocks)