Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reid W. Barton
Fails , as amply demonstrated above. Most of the content consists of laudatory trivia and is neither notable nor verifiable via secondary sources. Regardless of one's opinion of the difficulty of winning IMO, Putnam, etc they are not independently notable. Also, since |Wikipedia is not a directory, arguments about "completeness of coverage" and "red links in IMO articles" seem ill-advised (such red links can be created &mdash; and sometimes they are &mdash; each time a book or paper is cited; the best solution is to de-link
— User:Arcfrk, 03:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:Notability)