Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Levin (fourth nomination)
to Peer-Directed Projects Center.  I can see a convincing argument that Rob Levin is not independently notable, but "non-notable" doesn't mean "delete".  "Non-notable" means "shouldn't have his own article".  And if we've decided he shouldn't have his own article, then it's very stupid to turn Rob Levin into a redlink that encourages an inexperienced editor to write one; and besides, "Rob Levin" is a plausible search term.  We can be more helpful to our end users than just giving them a redlink.  A redirect would take them to some of the information they seek, and there's no reason why Peer-Directed Projects Center shouldn't contain a sentence or two about Mr Levin.  In terms of our formal procedures, we're supposed to exhaust the |alternatives to deletion before we delete this material, and a redirect ''is'' a perfectly reasonable alternative
— User:S, 00:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)