Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Heche
Full-article reviews of her two books, one in the Chicago Sun Times, the other in the Christian Post, evidence notability in my view via , quite a bit of coverage in "Call me Crazy" by her daughter, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=ADHB&p_theme=adhb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0ED028C1EE94CCF3&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM This Daily Herald piece and the CBN piece give me additional confidence in my judgment.  Notability is not inherited automatically via policy, but sometimes it leads towards notability in the real world, and so may or may not be the case here, through the subject's activism and authorship. Possible POV issues, even egregious ones, Wikipedia:Npov#Achieving_neutrality|should be dealt with via normal editing and/or getting assistance at the POV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard|noticeboard; concerns about problematic editors should similarly be taken to the Wikipedia:RFC/U|appropriate noticeboard, neither is, per Wikipedia policy, a valid rationale for article deletion
— User:Joe, 04:46, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)