Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Motor Film Awards
original nominator): yes, twenty six references have been added, but not one that contains substantial material about the Festival. Reference 2 is about the 2015 winners, and has a couple of paragraphs about the festival. That would work as a second source if it were coupled with a more substantial independent piece about the festival; but AFAICS the other 26 references are all about particular films nominated or winning. It is possible that one or two of them have a paragraph or two about the Festival (I doubt it, but I haven't looked); but unless one of them has ''substantial'' material about the Festival ''and'' that material plainly does not come directly from the Festival but is somebody's independent work, the article does not establish |notability for the festival. {{U|Janipewter}} this is not a comment about the quality, importance, or popularity of the Festival: it is about whether it meets ''Wikipedia's'' criteria for whether ''Wikipedia'' is prepared to host an article about it. As for other articles: that is not relevant: there are many substandard articles in Wikipedia, some of which should be deleted if anybody gets round to it. See WP:other stuff exists|other stuff exists
— User:ColinFine, 17:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)