Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosanne Henry
No prejudice against recreation in the future if enough properly |reliable sourcing can ''actually'' be found to get her over  — but she's not entitled to keep an article on Wikipedia that's referenced solely to her own self-published website, or that's formatted like a résumé. ''Especially'' in a , notability and reliable sourcing has to be demonstrated ''immediately'', and is not something that you get to claim an ''exemption'' from just because the article is "new
— User:Bearcat, 18:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)