Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodleigh School, North Yorkshire
First of all can we please stop the shouting, e.g. "DISPICABLE BEHAVIOR!"; highly uncivil personal attacks, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FWoodleigh_School%2C_North_Yorkshire&diff=489290209&oldid=489289711 this; and accusations of vandalism when the edits are legitimate, albeit controversial, disagreements over content and/or sourcing. Second of all, Yunshui was ''not'' the editor who nominated this article for deletion, and has currently opined a merge rather than a delete. Nor has s/he participated in the recent editing/re-structuring of the article or removal of its references, and has in fact supported the suggestion that the original references and material remain for the duration of this discussion. Thirdly, I don't understand the determination to delete Council for the Registration of Schools Teaching Dyslexic Pupils simply to |make a point when having an article on the Council is actually of ''benefit'' to the Woodleigh School article. This really has gone far enough, and I'm now going to ask a couple of uninvolved administrators to keep a close eye on this discussion
— User:Voceditenore, 12:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)