Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Jackson
There is a role listed here (Chicago Housing Authority) where I can see a theoretical path to notability if the article actually featured ''substantive'' content about his work ''in'' the role rather than just ''saying'' he held it — but there's nothing here that's "inherently" notable enough to guarantee him an article just because he existed, and one short blurb about his appointment to that job, one |primary source and two pieces of routine local death coverage are not enough to get him over  if they're all the sourcing you can show. No prejudice against recreation if somebody can actually dig out enough archived sourcing to do much, much better than this — but even GNG is ''not'' just "anybody and anything that can show two footnotes
— User:Bearcat, 14:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)