Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhotoSpring
Wikipedia is not a Yellow Pages or a substitute for a corporate website. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. The onles listed by Kvng above fail since http://www.eweek.com/innovation/photospring-stores-images-in-intelligent-wifi-connected-frame the eweek reference is a review of the product written exactly like an advertisement and contains no information on the company, failing , https://www.fastcompany.com/40503813/the-second-coming-of-small-screens-in-the-home the fastcompany reference is a mention-in-passing and fails  and https://www.zdnet.com/article/photospring-smart-frame-review-todays-technology-enhances-the-photo-frame-experience/ the ZDNet reference appears to also be a review of the product and fails . Perhaps the product is notable and the article can be renamed/reworked in that direction, but the company on notability
— User:HighKing, 17:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)