Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birmingham Council election, 2008
has multiple non-trivial reliable sources. Wikipedia is an almanac, and therefore does keep details of notable election, where the information is sourcable. Notability has been established - deletion would be a retrograde step on the road to building an encyclopedia. I agree, it "could easily be deleted", (as can any page) but why? A |verifiable, |neutral article on a |notable subject that does not resort to |original research does not seem like a worthy candidate for deletion
— User:EJF, 16:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:N||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)