Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Kade
Clearly fails both  and the GNG.  Not even verifiable for the most part.  This kind of misinformation is harmful to the encyclopedia.  There is no consensus that a senior researcher at GM is notable, that is merely DGG's personal opinion and it is not backed up by anything credible in this instance. That an article is new does not mean that the subject is notable.  Let's deal with facts and reality and not wishy-washy I Like It or I Can't Really Tell arguments
— User:Drawn, 16:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)