Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Voelker Sr.
District court is not a level of office that confers an automatic pass of our notability standards for judges, but this article is not |reliably sourced anywhere near well enough to get him over the bar: it's entirely too dependent on |primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things or people, none of which is enough. I won't rehash everything I've already said, but my comment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Xavier Ransdell lists the evidence that Gulfstream411 was indeed almost certainly a Billy Hathorn sockpuppet
— User:Bearcat, 16:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)