Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public weal
The fact that "public weal" is still used in some contexts does not mean that it is not archaic; a complete lack of usage would make it obsolete.  But "public weal" is not colloquial and has an antique air about it, hence archaic.  As to Mad War and League of the Public Weal, neither of these seem appropriate.  From , under "What not to include," partial title matches are not included.  War of the Public Weal redirects to League of the Public Weal, while the article on the Mad War does not call it the "War of the Public Weal."  Those unfamiliar with the term "weal" may well misunderstand the meaning of the league's and war's name, but this is solved by linking to the wiktionary, not by disambiguation.  Rather, a disambiguation page would be necessary if the Mad War were sometimes called "The Public Weal," which it is not, even if sometimes called the War of the Public Weal.  The same goes for the League.  "Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving conflicts in Wikipedia article titles that occur when a single term can be associated with more than one topic, making that term likely to be the natural title for more than one article. In other words, disambiguations are paths leading to different articles which could, in principle, have the same title."  The other two links seem covered by the section of  that says "A disambiguation page is not a list of dictionary definitions
— User:RJC, 21:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DAB||WP:DAB (Wikipedia:Disambiguation)