Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea lioning
to Wondermark. Yes, it passes . However the article must have encylopaedic information - {{tq|That is, such articles must go beyond what would be found in a dictionary entry (definition, pronunciation, etymology, use information, etc.), and include information on the social or historical significance of the term.}} - . Currently it doesn't meet that, having only the definition and etymology. I was looking for the possibility of expansion, and the extra information I can find is: that it was derived in relation to gamergate and that it has been "embraced" by the subreddit KotakuinAction sourced to this unpublished "computer science" paper - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.05851.pdf (not a super RS for this I think). IMHO the possibility of expansion is a little grim based on the sources I've found so far; so it should be merged
— User:Galobtter, 09:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:WORDISSUBJECT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)