Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bell Canada
difficult decision for me, as I hate Bell Canada with a passion! (250$ bill - what?)  However, this article does suffer from neutrality issues.  It is essentially a . Sources are about Bell Canada, not "Criticism of Bell Canada".  An article like "Bell Canada billing practices", which covered all aspects of Bell's billing practices, both positive and negative, would satisfy our NPOV requirements.  This article does not. If this was a BLP, there would be little argument. (''Not'' suggesting corps. should have the same rights as people ;)).  These "Criticism of" articles fail , they present one side of the story, and have a "point" - namely that Bell sucks. (Which may well be true, but it is subjective, and not within our mandate
— User:The, 19:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTADVOCACY (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)