Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemical postevolution
I think a full article on this topic is premature at this time. The topic is very interesting though, and should probably be discussed briefly elsewhere. I don't think there is an intrinsic problem with naming an article by a relatively new scientific term. The problem is that a dozen or so scientific articles on the concept discussed in the article, apparently all from the same group of researchers(?), is not enough to warrant a full article, see . A longish section in a related article could serve the same purpose, however
— NONE, NONE
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Notability)