Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of killings of Muhammad
OR '''Merge with main article'''. Not  or  because it's a list (see Amatulić vote) . Not  Concentration of facts does not imply an agenda if sources view and discuss it in such a fashion (see also non-article sources ITT), lists by their nature concentrate facts and higher test standards must be applied. Both arguments against the sources do not hold water ("primary religious texts and other outdated scholarship" is factually untrue and would be irrelevant if it was, the events took place 1500 years ago; "wouldn't pass muster even if all the sources were excellent and recent" implies what it argues against.) Not  because there are no alternate opinions if the list answers the criterion by which it is arranged. Lack of WP precedent is factually untrue, see for example List of postal killings or List of killings and massacres in the British Mandate for Palestine to which same argument can be applied. However recommend to improve by specification (e.g. "List of notable killings authorized by Muhammad" etc) and attentive verification of sources. Unfortunately a case of 
— User:Zombiestan, 16:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:NOR||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:UNDUE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:No original research)