Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatrice M. Mady
Agree with above, based on earlier version of article, but there are sources (required some digging), reliable sources, a review in the NY Times in 1996, she exhibits many places, professor, but the article in its previous state was essentially a resume, possibly written by someone who does not understand how Wikipedia works? If keep, my vote is a weak keep; depends on discretion of admin making decision; my sense is she barely meets the |general notability guideline
— User:Tomwsulcer, 23:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)