Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texture advection
The nomination seems to misunderstand our  policy, which has nothing to do with the potential for expansion. {{cquote|One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written. Another perennial source of confusion is that some paper dictionaries, such as "pocket" dictionaries, lead editors to the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent
— User:Colonel, 11:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)