Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beamery
I think the previous deletion mentioned in the nomination was a CSD G11 rather than an AfD? As to the article, it describes the feature proposition and the funding, but neither these nor inclusion in a "fastest-growing in sector" list provide evidence of attained encyclopaedic notabiility. Some of the references are items by firms involved in funding this venture, so also have to be considered as . Fails , . (Note there is also a similar :Draft:Beamery by the same author
— User:AllyD, 10:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:PRIMARY||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)