Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rompivalasa
as a |recognised populated place. If we can verify its mere existence (as has now been done for this village) such articles are normally allowed to remain. "Original research" is unfortunately rife among articles of this type. I think it is tolerated because we would otherwise lose much basic information about a place, and because much of it could (in principle) be verified by visiting the place and seeing for oneself. I would only remove trivia, advertising, non-notable residents and the like
— User:Noyster, 10:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GEOLAND (Wikipedia:Notability)