Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy 2.1
The sourcing really concerns me. The only independent source that covers the topic seems to be the article about New York and possibly the Portuguese article. The Scotland one does not (passing mention), and other ones are marketing articles about the creator (Carnegie Mellon, Politico.eu) and are not actually about the voting system itself (for instance, discussing the voting system in an academic article, versus being about the creator and then discussing the voting system). It's a really odd article, since a voting system shouldn't in theory be tied in with marketing, but this reads and is sourced like an article that would fail . Does not pass 
— User:SportingFlyer, 02:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)