Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fish Information and Services (2nd nomination)
Regardless of the notability of the subject, this discussion is really about whether or not the first AfD was closed properly - that is discounting the susupected sockpuppet votes. That discussion (regarding the propriety of the original close) belongs at |DRV, not back here at AfD. If the original closing admin has already discounted the socks when determining that there was no consesnsus, then the default action is to keep and we should not be having this discussion. If the socks were not taken into account when reaching that determination, then this is a debate about the closing and is properly handled at DRV. Either way, without some kind of intervening act, a second AfD after three days is inappropriate
— User:JimMillerJr, 16:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DRV (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)