Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doxy.me
According to , "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Based on that, this startup meets the primary criteria listed at  with at least the following sources: https://www.businessinsider.com/bootstrapped-telehealth-startup-doxyme-go-to-for-doctors-investors-2020-6 1, https://www.deseret.com/utah/2020/8/22/21348724/pandemic-coronavirus-high-tech-covid-19-business-growth-telehealth-e-commerce-overstock-com-doxy-me 2, https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/doxyme-simplicity-key-security 3, and https://www.techradar.com/best/best-telemedicine-software 4. These all meet: 1) , 2) multiple, 3) , 4) , and 5) . I was also able to find the following sources which appear to satisfy the criteria above but have not been included in the article: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/doxy-me-sues-doximity-to-clear-telemedicine-trademark-use 4 and https://www.techradar.com/reviews/doxyme 5 (this is a review but it's from a reliable source so I believe it still meets ). On top of that, there are almost 2000 results when searching for articles covering the organization. The sourcing is there to meet , it may just need some help from other editors to better convey notability in how it's written. Keep and tag as a stub
— User:Spicypumpkin, 01:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:RS||WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:Notability)