Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeta (company)
for the purpose of full disclosure, I came across this article while defending its AfC acceptance to Godric, I see why someone might argue GNG. I had not intended to comment on it, but on deeper examination of the sources, I felt the need to,  After review the sourcing is the standard coverage you would find in business publications that is not an in-depth analysis of the company or coverage of its impact in the general purpose press. The articles cited are effectively press releases. I do not see the type of coverage envisioned by  and , and thus it is not sufficient to meet the GNG. Additionally, as written now, it is little more than a directory listing, and |Wikipedia is not a directory
— User:TonyBallioni, 19:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:ORG||WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:Notability)