Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of crooners
or '''Merge''' to Crooners. The deletion arguments make no sense - the topic of crooners is notable, we're agreed? And there are notable crooners with articles on Wikipedia, right? We know that, as we've got a category for them; we must be able to define who a crooner is, so it isn't indiscriminate - we use the descriptions given by reliable sources. If there's a content dispute, we resolve it, we don't delete whole articles. And the existence of a category doesn't preclude the existence of a list. So what argument is left for deletion, other than 
— User:Fences, 02:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)