Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James M. Matarazzo
The academic study of special libraries does indeed appear to be a low-citation discipline, so I don't think we should read too much into the unimpressive numbers in Matarazzo's citation record, but neither is that a justification for keeping the article on #C1 grounds. And our article Special Libraries Association says that its fellow title is "awarded to mid-career SLA members", which is not the kind of "highly selective honor" that would pass #C3. So the strongest claim to  notability would appear to be through #C2 and the SLA Hall of Fame and John Cotton Dana Award. Additionally, the article already listed two reviews of two of his books and I added four more reviews of two more books. It's a little on the light side for  but above threshold for me. So combining #C2 and AUTHOR, and the one in-depth reliably-published obituary (not enough for  by itself, but also contributing to notability) I come down as a keep on this one
— User:David, 20:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)