Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jw.org
As to size of organization, please read .  I think it would maybe qualify as a redirect just as you did Watchtower.org, but as of now, the website (as a standalone website) doesn't meet notability.  *New* websites are the defacto definition of what db-web speedy was designed for.  I don't begrudge you for pulling the speedy tag, although that is clearly against policy for an article creator to pull a speedy tag.  You should have used the {{HANGON}} tag.  You should also have FINISHED the AFD process, which the failure of may look like someone trying to work around the system.  I am taking you actions in good faith, but you see that they were really contrary to policy.  Regardless, the site fails notability.  I wouldn't object it was redirected to Jehovah's Witness, which is the only thing that makes the site have any potential notability anyway
— User:Pharmboy, 20:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)