Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have been pied
This article is an extension of pieing.  Also, pieing (and incidents of pieing) apparently seems to receive quite a bit of coverage.  I am unconvinced by arguments to delete, which so far have been  (including the nom's reasoning), "no need reason to publicize and thereby encourage this type of assault" (I doubt people do things ''just'' so they can end up being mentioned on WP; it's much easier to just create a hoax article), and #IINFO.  The last one is rooted in a guideline, but even a cursory examination of #IINFO shows this list does not qualify any of the 8 categories of articles that are listed there as inappropriate.  On a different note, it may be appropriate to merge the info to Pieing (not too long an article) so that the content is better organized
— User:Black, 04:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTUSEFUL||WP:NOT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)