Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collaborative Entrepreneurship
Nominator states: "Original research" This is false. Please strike this claim nominator. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Collaborative+Entrepreneurship%22 15 Articles on Google news, including http://globalnation.inquirer.net/mindfeeds/mindfeeds/view_article.php?article_id=173361 A new concept of entrepreneurship: "The current buzz word is “collaborative entrepreneurship” (CE)" Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/13/AR2005121301828_4.html The Purchase Of a Lifetime. The book: http://www.sup.org/book.cgi?id=3525 Collaborative Entrepreneurship How Communities of Networked Firms Use Continuous Innovation to Create Economic Wealth from the esteemed Stanford University Press, http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Collaborative%20Entrepreneurship%22&sa=N&tab=nw 6900 google hits.As typical, the nominators' first and only edit to the page was to add a AfD tag, if the editor would have followed , , and Wikipedia:Notability which state: "If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself."  the nominator may have found these sources.Re: "Advertising" and "essay" accusation, the editor has 10 edits, with a little coaching, he could become an active member of the wikipedia community.  We could have helped him build this article up to meet and exceed all of our pleathora of guidelines.  But instead, the editor's user page when I went there had 3 warning templates and not a single "welcome". With treatment like this it any wonder that the Economist blames the drop of wikipedia on behavior like this?I could rewrite this article, but it is too late, it will be deleted because the delete editors above didn't bother to check sources before voting to delete, or help this new fledgingly editor.  Better it be '''|userfied''' and the new editor can work on this page in relative peace, at least for a short period of time. http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10789354
— User:Ikip, 09:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRESERVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:userfication (Wikipedia:Editing policy)