Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Kumar (2nd nomination)
This appears to be a high-citation field; e.g. even the highly specialized topic of synthesis of polyhydroquinoline derivatives using a Hantzsch reaction (his 1st and 3rd-cited papers) has citation counts 234, 170, 137, 115, 88, 74, ... in Google scholar (searching keywords polyhydroquinaline and hantzsch; the 170 and 74 are the subject's, and are neither the first nor the most highly cited on this topic). Additional evidence that this is a minor and specialized subtopic is that we don't even have an article on polyhydroquinaline. So although the most likely avenue of notability is through #C1, I think the case there is not strong enough to carry the day in the absence of anything else. Certainly the claims in the article of "significant contributions" to wide areas of biology and chemistry appear overblown
— User:David, 03:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)