Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steak and Blowjob Day (4th nomination)
I heartily disagree with the assertion that the subject fails either notability or sourcing requirements.  Saying something does not make it true.  The |requirement for notability is ''If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article''.  The article includes 24 references, all of which are from reliable, notable, independent and differing sources.  All references are specifically about the meme/day.  The sources include ''Bild'', ''LA Weekly'', ''Huffington Post'', ''Cosmopolitan'', ''Gothamist'', the ''Daily Mirror'', and notable feminist writer Feminista Jones.  You can see them on the article.  That, clearly, ensures the notability requirements are met.   There are also many other sources out there (as per the article talk page and the DRV discussion) yet to be worked into the article.  I would like the nominator to be able to provide his/her rationale as to '''why''' he/she considers '''all''' these sources to not be |reliable, and back up their unfounded assertion that the article fails to meet Wikipedia's reliable sources guidelines.  I expect a number of  !votes on this AFD and trust that the closing administrator weighs them appropriately.   Disclosure: I am the one who rescued this article and took it through DRV, where there was a strong consensus in favour of allowing recreation and where neither the notability or the reliability of the sources was disputed
— User:Fish, 09:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)