Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohm Phanphiroj
this blather, because |WP:IMPISSEDOFF: I'm entirely innocent of the action alleged in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHoary&diff=261941430&oldid=261929052 this posting, though I'll concede that it woke me up in a way that no single cup of coffee could do, and that it has a certain black humor value. ''Contra'' Schweinwefermann, I ''do'' believe that ''"his works are shown in galleries and museums in the USA and Europe as well as in Asian countries"'' is an assertion of notability; I just haven't seen any evidence of this, and I have been waiting a long time. A quick look at Amazon showed that yes our man does indeed have at least one book published; its cover has a competent (focus, lighting, and exposure all OK) photo of a "hunk" with his legs widespread; those who are interested in male organs may be fascinated, while I (who happen to have other predilections) see no more (or less) ''photographic'' (or exhibition-worthy) value in this than in any of the lovingly lit depictions of female cleavage on the covers of the cheesecake anthologies published by the dozen every month in the nation where I happen to live. In other words, the man appears to be a competent artisan, no more; for two years I've been willing to be proven wrong via citation of  but this hasn't happened yet
— User:Hoary, 00:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)