Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identity tourism
Easily passes . AFD is not cleanup. A cursory  search in my university's online catalogue shows a plethora of peer reviewed academic journal articles and books on this topic. There's clearly not a lack of sourcing or notability issue here. If a content fork  needs to happen that is an editorial issue that should be solved outside of the AFD process. Likewise any issues in the writing style or content organization should be solved through tags and discussion on the article's talk page and not here at AFD.  doesn't apply here because at this point the amount of academic published content on this topic is extensive. My university library contains 460 peer reviewed journal articles on this topic
— User:4meter4, 17:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Notability)