Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core energetics
There is a glaring inconsistency in WP rules, when a nominator for the peer-reviewed process of AfD can be guilty of infracting  for not checking available sources, but any editor can tag that same article with  or  and delete it without discussion, or bothering to look for sources. Also , , or , without having to look for evidence, or  without there having to be anything wrong with the article whatsoever. While the nom did not check Books, at least it was brought to AfD
— User:Anarchangel, 01:49, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:A7||WP:A9||WP:F4||WP:F7||WP:F11||WP:G5 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)