Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Add Grup
I concur almost entirely with the nominator's analysis of the article's sources as directory-type listings, trivial mentions, press releases, otherwise not third-party, or not significant coverage. However, I agree with {{U|ThaddeusB}} that there is no proof that the http://www.logos.press.md/node/34072 Logos Press article is a paid promotional piece. (Admittedly, I'm not au fait with the media landscape there, and my Moldovan is rudimentary.) The http://newsmaker.md/rus/novosti/aleksey-lazarev-na-samom-dele-my-gorazdo-luchshe-ih-umnee-my-golodnye-a-oni-sytye-10667 interview ThaddeusB found might be a useful source of information, but doesn't establish notability because it's a primary source which is mostly the president of the company talking about the company, with little or no independent analysis. Searches turned up no additional sources that would prove notability. With at best one independent, reliable, secondary source, the subject fails to meet 
— User:Worldbruce, 23:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)