Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupid Videos (2nd nomination)
as per previous nomination.  Also, you should actually search for third party references.  I believe http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS163498+07-Jan-2008+MW20080107 reuters and http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2006/07/27/fox-atomic-licenses-content-from-stupidvideos-com DMR qualify.  Also, the argument that because there are other video hosting websites is gay.  There are multiple political parties, and yet they all have articles unless they aren't notable.  Also, an Alexa rank is a bad metric to use; 
— User:Celarnor, 19:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTBIGENOUGH (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)