Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Noble (3rd nomination)
Being national cochair of a small political party is not a free notability pass that automatically entitles a person to have a Wikipedia article just because he exists, sourcing be damned — it can get a person over the bar ''if'' he can be shown to clear  for it, but it does not make him so critically important for us to cover that having to source him ''properly'' becomes ''optional''. But the references here are a Blogspot blog, two blurbs tangentially covering stray facts about the party which completely fail to even mention Noble's name ''at all'' in the process, and two raw tables of election results — so not even one of the sources actually present in the article is contributing ''squat'' toward making him notable at all. And if literally all you can find on the Google for new sourcing is one piece by a ''Huffington Post'' blogger and local media coverage of the type that ''any'' school board trustee would simply be routinely ''expected'' to receive in his local newspaper, then no, that's ''not'' enough coverage to make him special. GNG is ''not'' just "count up the Google hits and keep anyone for whom n meets or exceeds 2" — it tests for depth and range and context, not just number
— User:Bearcat, 00:08, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)