Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Murdock
I did my homework before taking this stance.  is met. The suggested #G10 describes speedy criteria of "attack pages" which "may include libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person or biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced."  The article presents its information neutrally and is well-sourced. OTRS is well and good, but if John Hinckley were to request through OTRS that the page about him be deleted because it described negative aspects of his life, we'd look to coverage and respectfully decline that request. We need to be just as careful in deleting as we are in allowing topics, and apply policy reasonably and evenly.  Any G10 should be declined, as the properly-sourced article is not libelous (information is available outside of Wikipedia in multiple reliable sources), nor does it make legal threats, nor does it present information intended only to harass or intimidate a person (though the subject himself may not like his life being written of within these pages), nor is it "entirely negative in tone and unsourced".  Sorry Hinckley. Sorry Murdock.  We only neutrally report within these pages that which is covered in more detail elsewhere
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 21:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Notability)