Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internets (2nd nomination)
you're AfDing this on the basis of  when about two-thirds of the text in the article is devoted to the effects and reaction to the term? To me this is almost a textbook example of what Wikipedia articles on neologisms ''should'' be like, and while your apparent campaign for better compliance with  is a worthy goal, you seem to be picking some pretty odd articles to wave it at
— User:Mazca, 13:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NAD||WP:NAD (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)