Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cars.com
notable as evidenced by the multiple reliable sources in the article, e.g. Library Journal or CNET, which can't be assumed to be promotional. Also, there's some interesting coverage about their marketing/management strategy in http://books.google.com/books?id=wphaxe6wtXYC&pg=PT260 this book. A $400m business can't be assumed non-notable.  The cars.com website is analyzed in a textbook about web user interfaces http://books.google.com/books?id=xRUFEhQwcZgC&pg=PT62. Being one of the few websites mentioned in the cars section of the 2009 O'Reilly Media book ''The Internet: The Missing Manual'' is another sign of notability http://books.google.com/books?id=dJomGlPLjF0C&pg=PA126. The same applies to ''Internet For Dummies'' http://books.google.com/books?id=r-kIZUpWShMC&pg=PA289. I think the nominator has put very little effort in researching the topic  firing up Twinkle
— User:Someone, 19:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)