Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Craven
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by  and fails to state a reason why notability should be presumed in lieu of sources under .  Googling turned up nothing useful, not even on Google scholar, where I expected I might find some papers that had been cited, given that the subject is a PhD.  I agree with nom.  This individual may be a very good at what he does but that has not made him notable
— User:Msnicki, 03:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)