Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music Is the Weapon (2nd nomination)
I've got this in my watchlist: there's a bit of vandalism etc., but not much. For notability, rather than just looking at the four sources mentioned in the last AfD, just search for it in Google: this album has generated a lot of ongoing speculation in reliable music news sources (i.e. many articles just about the album, not just passing mentions), passing GNG, and I would agree with {{u|Sergecross73}} from the last AfD that it's comparable to ' ''Chinese Democracy'' example (and note that the  quote mentioned above is prefixed by "generally", as well as the example I mentioned for high profile unreleased albums – the purpose of this guideline seems to be for cases where fans of a minor band start an article when there's nothing to say yet – the expansive coverage in this case makes me think it doesn't apply). The article is already beyond a stub, so ' "articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography" is passed too. &#8209;&#8209
— User:Yodin, 11:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FUTUREALBUMS||WP:FUTUREALBUMS||WP:NALBUMS (Wikipedia:Notability)