Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protologism (3rd nomination)
as a section: It's well-referenced and considerably more than a , giving history and background. WP itself frequently has articles or article sections on protologisms (e.g. Campaign for "santorum" neologism which began as Santorum (slang), then was merged into the Dan Savage article, before being developed much further into the present article)  It would be helpful to have an article on the protologism concept to link to, instead of having the explain it ''{{lang|la|in situ}}'' (with sources) every single time it comes up.  Additional sources, just from one search: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=protologism+-proctologist+-proctology+-protoplasm&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5
— User:SMcCandlish, 08:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)