Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomas Gorny (4th nomination)
Passes.  In my opinion, SwisterTwister’s approach here is more destructive than constructive, and I know this has been mentioned in the past. Did anybody bother to check online about subject’s notability? The article was published by a confirmed contributor, and has been voted Keep by several senior editors and admins in the previous AfDs. We are now at the 4th nomination, and will go on to subsequent ones until the nominators get what they want. This is simply abuse and not the way AfD was intended. The subject easily meets , and that’s enough reason to keep the article. I’m opting to remain anonymous here to avoid any subsequent drama, just wanted to assist in the discussion.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/88.27.194.58|88.27.194.58
— [[User talk:88.27.194.58#top|talk]])   — [[Special:Contributions/88.27.194.58|88.27.194.58]] ([[User talk:88.27.194.58|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic., 11:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)