Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natami (2nd nomination)
Is there any hope of consensus towards a merge? That Natami has sufficient verifiable information to warrant a paragraph (or few) at a fairly Amiga#Amiga_hardware_clones|obvious destination seems easy to justify. The only dispute over the current sourcing is whether it's strong enough to confer |notability sufficient for a separate article. I am absolutely opposed to the outright removal of Natami content from Wikipedia, I just remain unconvinced that it warrants its own article
— User:Ginsengbomb, 01:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)