Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensual Meditation
While this apparently at best barely-discussed topic could have been included in previous discussions, I think we can reasonably give the nominator the benefit of the doubt in perhaps reviewing the available sources for each article individually. I would also advise that any attempts to make substantial changes to the main Raelism article based on the deletion of these pages be not made until and unless other individuals agree to the proposed changes. The Raelism article is currently at GA, and, however ''committed'' certain editors might be to material regarding that movement, the article might, potentially, be placed under GA review if the material is unbalanced in the eyes of others. Also,  indicates that no one editor should feel he has the right to make changes to such a good article based on their own opinions. I think it would make most sense to propose changes to that article on the talk page first, and only make them after a clear consensus for such changes is established
— User:John, 19:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OWN (Wikipedia:Ownership of content)