Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Albert (writer) (2nd nomination)
Writers are not automatically notable just because their work exists; they need to show some evidence of ''significance'' (notable literary or screenwriting ''awards'', etc.), not just verification of existence. But this features no indication of significance, and it's referenced 50 per cent to directory entries (IMDb, Yahoo Movies, the self-published schedule listing of a TV channel, etc.) that aren't support for notability at all — and while the other four footnotes are real media, three of them are neighbourhood hyperlocals and/or alt-weeklies (which would be fine for use if there were other, better sources around them, but are not widely distributed enough to ''carry'' a  pass all by themselves if they're more or less ''all'' the coverage he actually has), while the ''Playback'' hit (https://playbackonline.ca/2006/05/15/tech-20060515/, since it hasn't actually been linked in the article) is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a piece that isn't ''about'' him, which means it's also not solid enough to vault him over the bar all by itself. And furthermore, I can find no indication that any film called ''Hunt for the Devil'' was actually produced or released ''at all'', as there's no film of that title listed in ''any'' of Scott Albert's, John McFetridge's ''or'' Michael Madsen's IMDb profiles
— User:Bearcat, 13:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)