Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuram
Notability is  (which makes the Nosebagbear's argument flawed). I don't see how he meets  as there is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources of the subject himself. Instead the article relies on Kalyanism and Dum for references, where he is either present as a passing mention or not at all. Nothing in my searches either. It is simply  at this point. He may easily become notable at some point, but not now
— User:Jovanmilic97, 12:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)