Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Booth
The text of the article makes it sound like he should be eligible under  criteria #1, but the sources all go to the research he is claimed to be notable for, not any independent sources confirming that he is in fact notable. If the claims already in the article could be properly sourced, I would withdraw my weak delete
— User:Monty845, 05:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)