Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1978–79 London Spartan League
Subject doesn't pass  and  (in reply to the above discussion about inaccessible texts, I think that's it's more likely than not that they are based on not more than {{tq|routine coverage of each game}}; I disagree that there's a general onus on the keep !voters to produce evidence of significant coverage, but there as onus on the side that claims a concrete example of coverage is significant, to back that assertion up with something, so that it isn't completely speculative). I disagree with the procedural critique outlined by {{u|Number 57}}. When there is a lack of a specific procedure, the more general procedure that is in effect needs to be used, it's a robust, transparent, and inclusive way of doing things. And if the results are a little unsatisfactory for the time being, that just means that we know ''why'' a new tool of process needs to be made, but discussions can't be based on this speculative future tool, in anticipation. Individual AfDs are more than fine. Edit: those who !vote delete based on their perceived need for a centralized discussion simply need to start that centralized discussion
— User:Alalch, 10:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SPORTSEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)