Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very minimum-shift keying
from original nom) - I agree that the article is now much-improved in structure and content, and I disagree with the premise that the technique being nonsense is grounds for its deletion.  I also agree that the refs are all on-topic.  However, I still don't believe notability has been established; a couple of throwaway mentions in some trade publications might barely scrape past the letter of , but not the spirit, in my opinion.  I've already commented on the papers.  Therefore, I maintain that the article should still be deleted
— User:Oli, 20:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)