Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doreen McAndrew DiDomenico
except for DeGise in this nomination (note this would be a procedural keep for DeGise). After a search for each nominee, the remaining subjects are county legislators and have only received local coverage of their work. Our precedents (per ) is that local politicians must receive "national or international press coverage beyond the scope of what would ordinarily be expected for their role."  The problem I have with  is that a tendency exists to address entire categories of subjects without evaluating whether any subject may "a fair or better chance of standing on its own merits" (). (In addition, nominating more than one subject for deletion limits the ease of searching for information about each subject). In the present case, DeGise is a county executive, and not just a county freeholder. I do think that a county executive is more akin to a mayor because of their executive authority and should similarly be evaluated on its own merit (which is different than the usual outcomes of county legislators). Because of that, DeGise should have been nominated individually
— User:Enos733, 00:46, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:BUNDLE||WP:MULTIAFD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)