Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antiverse
It's definitely not , although I'm also skeptical that this idea will prove fruitful. In any case, it's not our job to judge scientific merit: it suffices to notice that there's no significant coverage in secondary sources (how could there be? the paper has just been published!). The coverage it received is pretty much only the announcement that the paper was published. Such coverage is nowadays routine for papers published by major institutes, if we would allow that to establish notability Wikipedia would have hundreds of articles about papers that got ignored by the scientific community. If this one makes an impact, then it will be the time to write an article about it. Not now
— User:Tercer, 20:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)