Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nostalgia Critic episodes (3rd nomination)
for the "also included" articles with the dates in the titles. That is just ludicrously disproportionate over-coverage of a very minor topic and probably requires no further consideration but, in case any of the walnuts crave a sledgehammer, I'll just note that some of them have no sources at all and some are "referenced" solely to social media and primary sources. ''Not one'' of them has a single valid RS reference on it! Oh, and I hurt my foot stepping on a shard of walnut shell.'''Delete''' for the main list article too. That is not quite so egregious in its scope but, again, it is  that dooms its content as well as a fair quantity of over-coverage. There are long paragraphs about individual episodes and ''nothing'' RS to verify them. In fact, there is only one non-primary source there at all; the very short Crunchyroll article and even that is not supporting the main list content, just some minor trivia about him getting a cameo appearance in a cartoon. Even if it were verifiable, 98% of this is fan writing unsuitable for an encyclopaedia. The best advice I can give to anybody who wants to keep this stuff alive is to set up their own fan wiki
— User:DanielRigal, 00:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)