Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idiom dictionary (2nd nomination)
per the 2012 AfD, which found the concept notable, and per . In particular, "One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written." The article is a stub. I have no strong objection to merging it somewhere, except that it would seem a somewhat uneasy fit at Idiom. Dictionary#Types might be OK
— User:Cnilep, 01:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIC (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)