Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amirite
Craddock1.  First, no one, especially not the admins, care about the users that are weighing in on this AfD, other than if they are socks.  This is about the article, not personalities, so please |assume good faith and lay off the negative comments about other editors' motivations or background.  I would especially be careful about the latter, as WP has a strict policy about |outing.  What happens off-wiki is not relevant to this discussion.  The |notability (or lack thereof) of the article is what is at issue.What you need to concentrate on is |reliable and |verifiable sources.  Backlinks don't count, nor do |self-published accounts, such as press releases.If the article has won a significant award, then a reliable source, and likely multiple reliable sources should cover it.  The fact that Jimbo was a judge is not significant as far as notability.  If you doubt that, ask him on his talkpage - Jimbo actually reads it and responds.  Focus on the article, not editors
— User:GregJackP, 02:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:OUTING||WP:NN||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:SELF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)