Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Associated Student Government
per . If the organization and its functions are notable, then the article should mention those functions - "The ASG is responsible for a variety of functions on campus, consisting primarily of X, Y, and Z." The specific legislative means and authority for those responsibilities, as shown in bylaws, constitution, etc., is unnecessary - unless those elements of the organization are notable in themselves (i.e. being the first or oldest such constitution). Once those elements are removed, the remainder is one paragraph of "About" and one paragraph under History. The About section should be the lede, and must be revised to present a Neutral POV - the organization's website does not get to write the lede, it must be neutral. The history section, similarly, must also be re-written, and it doesn't really discuss the organization's history, but rather cites an example of the organization's activity. Of the sources, at least half refer to the ASG's site, which isn't an independent source. The other half discuss events and activities unreferenced in the article - those links are nice and all, but nothing in the article says ''why'' they demonstrate notability.  is a serious concern, as noted - and the author's percieved relationship to the organization and its members may comprimise his/her neutrality. I think that this article would be salvageable, but for the notability issue - though I wouldn't mind being proven wrong. Best
— User:Ultraexactzz, 18:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTE||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)