Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela L. Johnson (2nd nomination)
Although I didn't explicitly !vote during the prior AFD my sentiments were clearly in favor of something like a weak keep. At this point it's clear that Johnson does not meet a continuing coverage test and indeed has very limited attention outside of the one WaPo series. I don't believe she satisfies  or  at this time. ''Note'' that I removed about two paragraphs from SashaSammy's post that were clearly libelous against an individual (and basically an ad hominem argument
— User:Dhartung, 21:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)