Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Todd
I do not think there are valid  concerns here.  1E says "Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but essentially remains a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them."  In this case, the "larger subject" is ''the fraudulent actions that Ashley Todd chose to commit''.  There is no way that Ashley Todd can do something which splashes the photo of her face, with the backwards 'B' she put on it herself, on TV screens and computer monitors all across the nation, and then say "oh, but ''I myself'' am still a low-profile individual."  Other  concerns only apply if the information is poorly sourced, but I see no evidence of that.  Now, one might argue that the "larger subject" itself, the entire "Ashley Todd affair", is only a transitory blip on the screen, and will be forgotten four weeks from now.  That's very possible but I do not think we should be looking into our  balls and declaring that ''unknown'' state of the future to be established fact and calling for a deletion on that basis.  I would fully support holding a deletion discussion in three or four weeks -- but I think that calling for deletion ''now'' is premature. -- Special:Contributions/65.78.13.238|65.78.13.238
— [[User talk:65.78.13.238|talk]]), 01:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)