Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bettina Pelz
I think there's a case for arguing she meets  as the creator of one or more notable works (her works being exhibitions or installations), e.g. Lichtrouten has some presshttp://www.derwesten.de/staedte/nachrichten-aus-luedenscheid-halver-und-schalksmuehle/lichtrouten-verzaubern-die-stadt-id7484802.htmlhttp://www.derwesten.de/wr/staedte/nachrichten-aus-luedenscheid-halver-und-schalksmuehle/20-kuenstler-gestalten-die-luedenscheider-lichtrouten-id2706533.htmlhttp://www.come-on.de/lokales/luedenscheid/bettina-pelz-groll-besichtigen-kuenstlern-standorte-installationen-2663699.html. However the existing article does not meet the requirements of a Wikipedia article on a creative individual: it needs to have an independently-referenced explanation of her importance as a curator (e.g. references to media or scholarly articles that explain her importance, not written by herself, her employees, colleagues or friends); a summary of critical opinions of her work (with references to reviews); ideally, information about her development as an artist/curator, influences, working practices, etc; and not just be a CV-style list of her various jobs and who she worked with. Virtually none of the references on the article currently provide independent analysis: this is a massive failure to produce an article that accords with Wikipedia policies. Someone fix it, please
— User:Colapeninsula, 15:20, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE (Wikipedia:Notability)