Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy Catalyzer (2nd nomination)
I am sorry but I don't see how this article is . The article seems to accruately report the current commentary pertaining to the E Cat story, and is backed up by sources. This is very much the essence of an acceptable Wikipeida article. If the internal components of the E Cat are unknown it is mostly because the promoters of this device pruposely give vague descriptions. Here is an interesting article about that in the http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2011-11-30/no-miracles-science-story-energy-catalyzer Energy Bulletin and why it is doubtful this device actually works. Additionally this is the type of press that this subject is generating. Therefore this Wikipedia article is doing what it is supposed to do, and that is reflect or report on what the sources say. Also, I don't see any reason to merge because this seems to work very well as a stand alone article. It is possible that even more press will be generated depending on whether investors put money into it. ----  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Steve, 02:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)