Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Gaga on Twitter
Renaming the article to @ladygaga is trivial to do if that's really an issue and her twitter account is clearly notable, as is her use of it and how it has influence her career. Sources that discuss it as such include http://books.google.com/books?id=a4N_9Qxwb_0C&pg=PR13&dq=Lady+Gaga+Twitter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2Pv3T8C0Aejd6wHI9PTqBg&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAQ#v=snippet&q=Twitter&f=false this (pgs 114-116) and http://books.google.com/books?id=Hw-9uQ2JYwAC&pg=PA100&dq=Lady+Gaga+Twitter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2Pv3T8C0Aejd6wHI9PTqBg&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Lady%20Gaga%20Twitter&f=false this (description of the account). However, what would be much better especially with Lady Gaga is to make the article be about all social media she's involved in, because she really is a virtuoso of using it (Sources: http://books.google.com/books?id=MZsSMKQZoYwC&pg=PA28&dq=Lady+Gaga+Twitter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VP33T6DXI4e06wHDvNjKBg&ved=0CGYQ6AEwCTgK#v=onepage&q=Lady%20Gaga%20Twitter&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=2-XMabF_ja4C&pg=PA90&dq=Lady+Gaga+Twitter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2Pv3T8C0Aejd6wHI9PTqBg&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Lady%20Gaga%20Twitter&f=false). So, unlike Barack Obama who is primarily focused on Twitter, Gaga uses Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube equally and is also in the process of setting up her own social network. Finally, all of your arguments have already been refuted in the Barack Obama on Twitter AfD, including why using INDISCRIMINATE and NOTDIARY are inappropriate arguments and how nothing in NOT applies here. Also, how this isn't SYNTHESIS and I wonder if you even understand what that means. This subject is notable and should have a standalone article, because there is way too much information to be covered in the Gaga main article without a |due weight issue
— User:Silver, 09:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)