Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthetic rope
I suppose, as contributing to a general improvement of the rope article but I don't feel strongly against merely a ''redirect'' (or even ''keep''). There is nothing wrong with the article and the topic passes  although editorially the contents could sensibly be handled as part of the broader topic. Even the nomination seems to be hinting at ''redirect'' although the earlier PROD had a contrary implication. Sometimes a redirect is accompanied by deleting the previous article content. This would not be appropriate here
— User:Thincat, 09:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)