Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MWICPS
Frankly, you should have upheld the speedy nomination. A7 or G11 would have done the trick. The organisation does not appear to be the slightest bit notable, as is evidenced by the primary sourcing and the lack of independent sources. |snowing in November
— User:HJ, 18:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)