Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iorworth Hoare (2nd nomination)
selectively to A v Hoare-  the material in the article about the case would be useful background information in the court case article.  says that we shouldn't have separate articles about criminals if the material on them can be covered in some other article. In this case the subject's notoriety derives from the lottery win and subsequent court case which set a legal precedent, both of which can be covered in the article on the court case. He doesn't meet the further standards at  as his victims weren't famous and the motivation/execution of the crime wasn't enough to make it a historical event
— User:Hut, 09:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:CRIME||WP:CRIME (Wikipedia:Notability)