Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter (Starbucks)
After all is said and done with my listing this for an IP, I believe that the guy in question passes notability guidelines. Yes, the guy's bizarre drive to visit every Starbucks in the world could initially have been seen to be , but the media has gone back about 5-7 years after the initial reporting in 2004 to follow up on his status in 2009, with a Turkish paper running an interview with him in 2011. If that's not enough, the guy was also the focus of the documentary "Starbucked", which has received a few reviews. If not for the documentary I'd have argued for  status as well, but all in all the guy and his documentary have received just enough coverage in multiple reliable sources to where I believe he passes . Being the focus of a documentary that has received multiple reviews and gaining coverage in RS is not a trivial thing. Silly and ridiculous? Yep. But then something can be silly and ridiculous and still pass notability guidelines
— User:Tokyogirl79, 16:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)