Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoneTooSoon
An interesting philosophical question, whether the ''Daily Mail'' is a |reliable source; but this obituary website seems to have attracted "mainstream" (?!) media coverage chiefly on account of a flawed ad-serving algorithm that dished out ironically inappropriate advertisements.  Then again, I am not sure what sort of advertisements would be appropriate for an obituary.  Leaving that aside, I don't see that minor flurry of coverage as something that meets |the website notability guideline
— User:Ihcoyc, 15:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)