Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jami Floyd
as subject does indeed have coverage by http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1994&as_user_hdate=2010&q=%22Jami+Floyd+%22%2C+%22Court+TV%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22Jami+Floyd+%22%2C+%22Court+TV%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go reliable 3rd part sources, thus meeting . That she is an opinion-maker and her views are sought show her as notable. That and her http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Jami+Floyd+%22%2C+%22awards%22&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a awards show she's "major" enough for Wikipedia. Article can be improved through normal editing and |as such is no reason to delete
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 20:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Notability)