Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full service (2nd nomination)
If the page is kept, it should be split. At present it is a poster child for  – a list of different concepts (a type of engineering firm, retail services, a radio format, and a sexual code word) that share the same name rather than a single concept. That might be an argument for deletion. On the other hand, though, some of the content may be notable and worth keeping, especially the 'sexual code word' sense
— User:Cnilep, 06:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NAD (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)