Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Kumar Pallathadka (2nd nomination)
In Wikipedia, it is possible for an author not to be notable under the provisions of uthor guidelines but to be notable in some other way under one of the other notability guidelines. Conversely, if an person is notable under  guideline, his or her possible failure to meet other subject specific notability guidelines is irrelevant. This is what we get from Wikipedia guidelines. So it is enough to pass any one or more guidelines as to be eligible to be on Wiki. However this subject passes , ,   and . I beg to differ with others over  and IMHO even sources from Leading Regional Language dailies such as Udayavani and Vijaya Karnataka are indeed reliable sources and meets . Their online absence and inability to keep archives is not to be taken as granted for rejecting them. Press Clippings uploaded in an Official website of a Cabinet minister cannot be considered as unreliable and unacceptable. I am not biased but what I am trying to say is accept to learn and respect regional languages as well. English is an Important communication language but the policy of ''we accept whatever which is in English and we dont accept whatever which we don't understand'' is not simply acceptable. If somebody don't understand any regional language then it is their problem and not the problem of that language. Sorry I just don't mean to offend anybody, I just felt and wanted to express. Thank you
— User:Bharathiya, 04:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GOOGLETEST||WP:GOOGLECHECK||WP:GFG||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Attribution)