Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Dose of Buckley
Seven of the eight footnotes are YouTube videos and other |primary sources which are not support for notability, and the only one that actually comes from a real media outlet is a smalltown community hyperlocal which isn't widely distributed enough to singlehandedly get him over  if it's the ''only'' acceptable source in play. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better sourcing than this — GNG is ''not'' just "everybody who's ever gotten their name into any newspaper on earth even once", but applies tests for depth and range and volume and context
— User:Bearcat, 14:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)