Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hartl
It seems to me that the primary reason adduced for the notability of the subject is his introduction of the constant &tau;.  The relevant guideline is of course , to determine if this is a lasting and important scientific contribution.  It's a clear fail there, as the subject has a Google scholar h-score of only just two or three
— User:Sławomir, 19:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)