Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamberlain-Ferris Act
Anyone object to |snowball keeping the article to spare unnecessary discussion? I'm sure the original nom and the first !vote were made in good faith, as the article was only a sentence or two then and wholly uncited. I believe notability has been thoroughly established in the meantime though, and the article has been expanded significantly. Speaking for myself, I don't see a need to keep this nomination active anymore
— User:Peteforsyth, 00:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SNOWBALL (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)