Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Service-Longépé
without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody unaffiliated with the subject herself can do better than this. While there's a ''potentially'' valid notability claim here, there isn't a |properly sourced one: of the five sources here, two are |primary ones, one is a glancing namecheck of her existence, and the two that are genuinely reliable and substantive don't really support much ''information'' about ''her'' besides the fact of writing a book (a fact which is ''not'' an automatic  pass for all writers of all books in and of itself.) Either there needs to be a greater ''volume'' of sourcing about her than this or the book needs to achieve something that makes it notable for more than just existing, such as winning a notable literary award or making a national bestseller list — and even if and when she can be properly shown to pass our notability standards for writers, she still doesn't get to create the article herself (or pay someone to do it for her) under our |conflict of interest rules. Sometimes we keep COI articles anyway and just give them a scrubdown for advertorial problems, but there's just not enough substance or enough sourcing here as of yet to overlook the COI in this instance
— User:Bearcat, 20:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:AUTHOR||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)