Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jihadi tourism
The term's obviously in use, but I clicked through all the examples given above, and they appear to all be about the Hezbollah museum being an example of jihadi tourism. I don't see any examples of jihadi tourism being discussed ''in itself'' as  seems to me to require. (Such as an article that seeks to define it, or an article that gives multiple examples to explore the phenomenon in multiple places or over time). The line I'm particularly looking at is: "An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books, and articles that use the term rather than are about the term) are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require analysis and synthesis of primary source material to advance a position". The first sentence of this article seems to me to be an example of this; the author's had to infer a definition that doesn't appear to be sourced. I feel like this article's likely to crest notability requirements in the near future but not quite there yet
— User:Khazar, 17:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)