Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Getmyhomesvalue.com
The references consist of 1. The Inc mention.  2. A piece that is actually about the subject's corporate parent with a small mention of the subject 3. A directory listing devoid of any evidence that getting the listing requires any notability. 4. A link to the corporate parent's website and 5. An award from a locally based business paper.  The question is does that count as being the "subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources".  Inc counts for something, although I cannot imagine that there is any precedent that all Inc 500 companies are notable.  Perhaps if Inc had actually written an article about the subject...  The Central Penn Business Journal counts for something although the criteria for this award are unclear.  The article's claim to notability that the firm required no venture capital is meaningless without context.  Is there any evidence that this is one of X number of companies that achieved $3 MM in revenue without venture capital financing?   Its not quite cutting it.  The company's growth is admirable, but being admirable isn;t notable.  You have to demonstrate that enough people cared abough about your success to write about it.  I won't call it spam, although its one of the more blatant |conflict of interest cases I have ever seen
— User:Montco, 01:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)