Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woozle effect
I thought some more about this, and unfortunately this can't quite merged with confirmation bias. There is only one book which even discusses them close together http://books.google.ro/books?id=nUyyvmz-Z0UC&pg=PA4, but without saying they are the same or even what their relative relationship might be. The examples section is unfortunately all sourced from the primary sources actually using the term (rather than any secondary sources observing that others use the term), which is generally discouraged by . The people theorizing about the woozle effect are generally also those using it as a rhetorical instrument (to smack their opposition), so we can't easily separate primary and secondary sources. There are some exceptions to this, for example the ''Father-Daughter Relationships'' book I've linked in this paragraph only cautions about the woozle effect in general, but doesn't target it at any one issue in particular either on that page or anywhere else in the book (using that term anyway.) On the the other hand, if we remove all the examples, all that's left is basically a  and some thin theorizing as to what it relates to. Its use in a few different sub-fields of social science (human trafficking, domestic violence) probably qualifies this for  in some way.  We do have a somewhat similar article called just-so story, which is based on a fairly similar choice of sources (mostly users of the term
— User:Someone, 13:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:DICTDEF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)