Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undertone Networks
per . The article can probably be expanded, with more than 100 GNews hits (excluding PR releases) to choose from. The nominator has not even attempted to rectify the problems before nominating the article. The company has received coverage in dozens of reliable sources. The fact that the article was not expanded is never a reason for deletion and the above delete-!voters do not even try to make a reasoning based on the available sources. Keystoneridin's !vote is particularly interesting here since I do not think it's spammy (then again, I rewrote it...). Regards
— User:SoWhy, 20:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)