Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Brain Laboratory
I think ''The Guardian'' and ''Nature'' together provide splashy enough coverage in both mainstream media and the scientific literature to pass . And the nomination statement is deficient as all secondary sources are based on primary sources; that's what makes them secondary
— User:David, 06:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)