Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PizzaRev
because the promotionalism outweighs any good, and this is because https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PizzaRev&oldid=788505576 this is what the article was before removing the spam (1-24 sources counted, and now after: 1-17 so it hardly helped), but it's still promotional so it violates our ive pillars of having non-promotional articles; copyediting is not what actually help here if it only sugarcoats the promotionalism instead of actually resolving it. GNG quotes that we need independent coverage, not simply secondhand press releases, see {{Green|Acceptable sources under this criterion include all types of reliable sources except works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as: brief announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business, simple statements that a product line is being sold, changed, or discontinued, routine notices of facility openings or closings, quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources or passing mention"}}. Worse, it seems we were taken advantage of since https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Darebear310 1, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/108.47.13.154 2 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/96.94.230.14 3 accounts so far added advertising. Sections 1 and 3 are advertising through and through and the middle section is basically sourced to the company's own menu website, so it cannot satisfy  and 
— User:Zppix, 17:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:F||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Non-free content)