Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Races and creatures in His Dark Materials
The two lists at least. I won't bother to comment on the other two right now. The arguments that those are proper splits are ridiculous.  is completely against that kind of content. These are lists of minutia that help nobody understand the context. Summary style content is king in fiction, and some people think that's impossible. Guess what? If the page is too long, then we simply don't need to cover the material unless backed by non-primary sources. I have never seen anyone actually argue why lists like these are necessary beyond pointless arguments like page views. Guess what? If you look at a specialized Wikia's views, they'll far surpass any page on Wikipedia. It's pointless to draw away views from useful information for this bare bones useless junk. Then there's the usual "there's sources because this is a popular series" arguments. The pages should not have been brought into existence without sources. If sources are actually abundant, we can try to imagine the articles' optimal states, but the promise of possible sources is just an excuse to let these linger
— User:TTN, 12:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTPLOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)