Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Future of Food
Per , , and lack of .  The |notability of an independent documentary film is not gauged by releases, but by http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0427276/criticreviews?ref_=ttawd_ql_6 wide analysis and commentary... and (at minimum) |true diligence using http://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-future-of-food Metacritic gives |multiple good quality independent sources to show this film as easily meeting : http://variety.com/2005/film/reviews/the-future-of-food-1200528865/ '''''Variety''''', http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/FILM-CLIPS-Opening-today-2605644.php#flick3 '''''San Francisco Chronicle''''', https://web.archive.org/web/20050924142937/http://villagevoice.com/film/0537,tracking4,67749,20.html '''''Village Voice''''', http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2005/10/21/a_credible_case_against_genetically_altered_food/ '''''Boston Globe''''', http://www.seattlepi.com/ae/movies/article/Future-heaps-on-the-biotech-food-horrors-1188106.php '''''Seattle Post-Intelligencer''''', https://web.archive.org/web/20081202162135/http://www.avclub.com/content/node/40641 '''''AV Club''''', http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/review/the-future-of-food '''''Slant Magazine''''',  http://movies2.nytimes.com/2005/09/14/movies/14food.html '''''The New York Times''''', and http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/the-future-of-food/Film?oid=1072475 '''''The Chicago Reader''''' to share but a few of the |'''MANY''' showing a '''lot more''' than the nominator's |claimed {{tq|"''bare smattering of coverage''"}}. Someone really failed to look and we do not substitute a personal opinion for diligence
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 17:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NRVE||WP:BURDEN||WP:BEFORE||WP:NF||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:PPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)