Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trūata
A news search does return a number of relatively recent sources. However, the majority of these seem to be of the "republished press-releases as journalism" variety - which is specifically called-out in the Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_independent_sources#Press_releases|relevant INDEPENDENT/CHURNALISM guidelines. For example, the https://www.ft.com/content/576171dc-27ab-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0 FT piece from 15 March overlaps in time/date/content with the https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180315005200/en/Truata-Delivers-Next-Generation-Data-Protection-Analytics-Europe original 15 March press release. And the "company creates 75 jobs" pieces on the https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/data-analytics-firm-to-hire-75-staff-for-dublin-hq-1.3537848 Irish Times. https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2018/0621/972134-new-truata-jobs/ RTÉ and https://www.techcentral.ie/truata-hire-75-new-dublin-office/ elsewhere in June all reflect the https://www.businessworld.ie/news-from-ireland/Tech-company-to-hire-75-personnel-in-Dublin-571005.html June press release by the company. Otherwise the half-dozen other mentions are of a |trivial nature (frankly to be expected in this day and age), and confirm only the |organisation's existence rather than its notability, and provide no evidence of |LASTING relevance. At *best* this seems like a case of |TOOSOON. However, while I am not saying this is the case here, the manner and pattern of this article's creation are very similar to those patterns seen with accounts involved in paid-editing. That pattern, together with the promotional tone of the first revision gives me pause relative to the  guidelines. Firm delete recommendation from me
— User:Guliolopez, 20:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TRIVIAL||WP:EXIST||WP:LASTING||WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)