Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Slater
This is definetely not a case of , apparently most of you didn't read the . The reliable sources are '''persistent'''. Right now, more people around the world know of this guy and this story then will ever know who John Hinckley is. And, according to , John Hinckley is the prototype of notability for a single event. There are more notes about this guy than about 99 percent of Wikipedia subjects. Right now, a google search for Steven Slater gives 1.4 million results. All of those results could be characterized as "Notes". If something has 1.4 million notes, then it is notable. Any other interpretation is a psychotic break from reality that, unfortunatley, has taken over the mind set of some Wikipedians. I just did a random article, from the home page of Wikipedia, and came up with "Chemlab", a band. Googling it reveals 90,000 results. How is that more notable than the millions for Steven Slater? There is no way that the notability of this story is going away. '''Keep
— User:Marcwiki9, 02:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)