Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bieber on Twitter
article, but '''merge''' the non-trivial bits (by which I mean the majority of the article) into Justin Bieber and/or Twitter. I could see how it would be a good example of the power of individual users on Twitter, but a whole article?  seems to apply here, a lot of the article is random facts about individual tweets. From what I've seen of the sources, a large number of them refer to Justin Bieber as the principal subject, and his twitter account only as a side-issue. See  - web content does not necessarily have inherited notability. In addition, if we were to adopt the level of notability for social media that this has, we should note that there are enough sources tangentially covering various topics, with articles being needed for hundreds of public figures on many different kinds of platform. This seems to go against the spirit (if not also the exact letter in every case) of several policies, including  for a start, DIARY, and, again, 
— User:Gilderien, 20:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WHIM||WP:WEB||WP:NOT||WP:NOTDIARY||WP:IINFO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)