Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinay Deolalikar
It is not clear at this point that the proof is flawed beyond reasonable hope (see for a similar example how there was initially a serious whole in Andrew Wiles proof), and even if the proof fails it is clear that Deolalikar's techniques are likely to be very useful and open a lot of new avenues of research which means that he arguably meets  and certainly will meet it very soon. Certainly, deleting this now when it isn't at all clear whether the proof is good or not is not helpful
— User:JoshuaZ, 22:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)