Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yakub Abahanov
the number of edits on a talk page does not address the reason I nominated this article for deletion and is not a basis for "significant coverage" or anything else.  Opinions stating "I think this man is notable" do not mean that there are independent secondary sources which focus on this individual; these opinions (less justification for these opinions) are simply examples of .  It boils down to the fact that there are no independent secondary sources out there (and I've spent time trying to find one, let alone significant coverage) in which this individual is the subject of the article.  The sources referenced in the article DO NOT focus on this individual (except for the military documents, which are not independent, secondary sources); if he is mentioned at all in the sources given, his name simply appears on a list.  This clearly doesn't meet the basic requirements for  nor the basic criteria for 
— User:BWH76, 06:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:BLP||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)