Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Potaski
First off, I think that the IP removing the AfD notice is definitely doing it in |good faith and was simply trying to say "I don't think it should be deleted". Secondly, I'm not an expert in this area, but just because it (apparently) wasn't peer reviewed, does that make the source unreliable, even though the author is a professor at a University? Also, just because Cahill states "Whilst there is nothing great about his life", he still felt the need to write five pages on him, which I would see as significant coverage. Lastly, I think the key here is not the Cahill ref, but the books by Tipping, Paszkowski, Cotter, Mullan etc. It would be they, if anything, that proves he has significant coverage in reliable sources. We may have to assume good faith if either
— User:Ian3280, 11:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)