Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Sarmast
As noted above, has certainly received plenty of coverage. I also disagree that this constitutes an ttack page--there is no disparaging or threatening language at all, that I can see; merely an admirably neutral-toned presentation and footnoting of the arguments against the subject's interpretations
— User:Hobbes, 01:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A (Wikipedia:Attribution)