Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid
Please see #Abuse of deletion process: '''"XfD(deletion) processes are not a way to complain or remove material that is personally disliked, whose perspective is against ones beliefs, or which is not yet presented neutrally. Using XfD as a "protest strategy" in an editorial or NPOV debate is generally an abuse of process and the article will usually be speedy kept."''' Without making a judgment on the worth of the article in question, Haham hanuka's nomination is a clear abuse of process. I note also that Haham hanuka has just recently been blocked for a week for another abuse of process on AfD and has a long history of blocks for 3RR and revert warring (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Haham_hanuka). I've asked for this deletion vote to be closed
— User:ChrisO, 18:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)