Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biology Fortified, Inc.
I agree that it fails the in depth coverage standard of .  However, I ended up reading the http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Biology_Fortified,_Inc.  article at SourceWatch, which was more balanced. The couple of in depth articles by GM-Watch don't amount to substantive coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, and have their own bias.  The ''Forbes'' was just a mention in passing, and the Cato Institute video wasn't independent. The "Biology Fortified’s GMO Corn Experiment" caught the eye of someone at ''Popular Science'' but the article is slim at best. I am not sure what to do with the numerous mentions at Jon Entine|Jon Entine's Genetic Literacy Project, whose bias is also obvious
— User:Bejnar, 06:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)