Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumpy da comedian (2nd nomination)
Since I was the nominator the first time, and my nomination statement has been copied verbatim here, I'm not going to make a formal deletion argument because that feels too close to the spirit, if not the letter, of our rule against "voting" twice in a consensus discussion — but I do still want to note that this hasn't been upgraded with a stronger claim of encyclopedic notability or any improved |reliable sourcing at all. It's also worth mentioning that the undeletion request at WP:REFUND didn't actually include a ''reason'' why undeletion was warranted — I'll grant that since nobody actually participated in the original discussion and thus it closed as a ''soft'' delete it wasn't unreasonable to just proceed with the request anyway, but a strong case for the article's keepability still hasn't actually been made anywhere. Also the creator is an  who has never contributed to Wikipedia on any other topic but this, so there's the possibility of a direct |conflict of interest
— User:Bearcat, 13:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SPA||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)