Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How Funny
per meeting  as a source that says it has released and speaks (even if briefly) toward a film project directly and in more-than-trivial detail is exactly what |criteria requires. In my own looking, I quickly and easily found representative more:http://english.onlinekhabar.com/2016/05/02/376297http://www.ecanadanepal.com/2016/04/nepali-film-how-funny-movie-review-on.htmlhttp://www.filmyjoy.net/2016/04/how-funny-two-days-box-office.htmlhttp://nepaliactress.com/priyanka-karki-transparent-dress-in-how-funny-premier/http://glamournepal.net/funny-pictures/http://nepalinsider.com/how-funny-movie-box-office-collection-report/http://devarbhabhi.org/interview-with-nilu-doma-sherpa-how-funny-director-2016.html  And to the {{u|Dan arndt|nominator}} and to {{u|Sheepythemouse}}, I politely remind that notability is based upon |sources BEING available and not upon their use in an article.  I humbly share the fun of |diligence and the India media search tools of . Better we work to improve this per what is available, than delete it because it is an ugly stub... IMHO
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 03:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:NF||WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:INDAFD (Wikipedia:Notability)