Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. H. Lightstone
obscure was perhaps the wrong word; my point was having written papers on your subject is not usually a criterion for inclusion, unless the papers are notable or the subject especially so. Otherwise every academic would merit an article and  sets the bar considerably higher. On citations Google is only a rough guide and 75 is not an especially high number for something written 35 years ago, while the even older article which seems to be the main basis for his notability has been cited only nine times
— User:JohnBlackburne, 17:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)