Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xone of Contention
Disruptive and grossly inaccurate nomination. If the nominator "can't see" any reviews, it's because he didn't look (and therefore didn't comply with . The most cursory search turns up reviews in ''Publishers Weekly''http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-312-86691-4 and ''Library Journal'' (quoted here, https://www.amazon.com/Xone-Contention-Xanth-No-23/dp/0812555236, apparently too old for online archive). It was also on the ''Locus'' list of noteworthy releases for the month of its original publication and, as I recall, on various genre bestseller lists, including ''Locus'', shortly thereafter. Even absent this level of coverage, there's no argument for deletion, since redirect targets are clear
— User:Hullaballoo, 13:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)