Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bowles (4th nomination)
The independent references look to be trivial with respect to their treatment of ''him'' specifically.  Seems like there's a decent argument for notability the of Bowles and Moxon firm, but I don't see anything that establishes him as notable aside from that.  If his name really wound up getting out there in these Scientology cases, then I guess I wouldn't have a problem with the encyclopedia being able to respond to his name being entered here.  But from what I can see, even if that's allowed, it would be better for the page resulting from entering Bowles's name to be that of the law firm, rather than be a bio of someone who doesn't seem to really meet  &mdash; at least not judging by what I see cited in the article (again, because what is cited in the article is trivial with respect to Bowles individually
— User:Mwelch, 22:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)