Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversational publishing
I agree with nom that the sources now in the article do not qualify as non-trivial coverage by ''"credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy"'' per .  And with only http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=100&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Conversational+publishing&as_oq=&as_eq=wikipedia&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images 13 unique GHits excluding "Wikipedia", I was unable to locate any.  As such, article should be deleted and resubmitted only if and when it achieves verifiable wide use as required by #Reliable sources for neologisms. --&nbsp
— [[User talk:Satori Son|Satori Son]], 18:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Verifiability)