Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Heilman
I believe that sources in our article in major publications centered around his activities on Wikipedia on at least three different occasions (the Readers Digest "Is Google Making Us Sick" story, the stories in several sources about the Rorschach test and subsequent complaints against the subject, and the NYT story about a plagiarism incident discovered by the subject) are enough for . If we think he's doing this in his capacity as an academic then he also passes #C7, or alternatively if he's doing this as a hobby then it doesn't matter whether he also passes : being an academic doesn't disqualify someone from being notable for some other reason. It's also irrelevant that all of these activities involve Wikipedia: they're diverse enough to avoid  and there's nothing in  or other policy that says we can't write about Wikipedians who achieve external notability for their Wikipedian activities
— User:David, 02:29, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E||WP:SELFREF (Wikipedia:Notability)