Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ney v. Landmark Education Corp.
WP:MILL|Run-of-the-mill district court case, setting no precedent. Yes, it was appealed, but the district court's judgment was s:Ney v. Landmark Education Corporation and Werner Erhard| affirmed in an unpublished opinion that cannot be cited as precedent. The fact that the Fourth Circuit designated the opinion as "Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States|unpublished" (i.e. "the court deems the case to have insufficient precedential value") is evidence of its unimportance. The sources indicate it got some news coverage, but ); the other sources appear to have axes to grind. Nothing to see here
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)