Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ash M. Richter
actual googling her results in considerable media, including her Google Scholar page with numerous publications and several 3rd party articles--all of which qual as |independent. Majority of third party citations do mention the subject by name, and/or are interviews or quotations of public addresses by subject. I continue to repeat my ongoing concern that female scientist stubs are being deleted from Wikipedia without due diligence and with prejudice. And if an archaeologist who now leads technology projects for the CIA isn't wikipedia worthy- what is? Or does she have to be a man to count?...Keep and reassess the standards and editorial standards that are blocking female scientists from having the presence they deserve User: Anonymous (because I'm tired of being trolled by male editors for objecting to their edits of women's wikis)   —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Hecate316, 00:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)