Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Meyer
I sincerely hope that you will not fall for all the non-notable and far-fetched "conspiracy-theorizing"; such is not the stuff of an encyclopedia and it can stay on alt.religion.scientology and ARS-derivative POV websites where it belongs and where those few that are interested can find all the conspiracy theorizing that they care to. That one of these ARS regulars, Keith Henson, fell for the conspiracy theories and broke the law adds little notability. The only real issue to decide here is if the local coverage in one newspaper meets the requirements of . I will not tell you how to decide that but simply mention that, yes, an accidental worker fatality in what must be a somewhat mysterious Scientology compound in a quiet area of the Inland Empire (California)|Inland Empire would get some local attention. Compare a recent situation where three divers perished while wreck diving on the USS Spiegel Grove (LSD-32)|Spiegel Grove. That got a lot of press attention locally and even nationally and lots of notice in the dive community, a community much larger by several orders of magnitude than the Scientology critic community. Did that make the dead divers; Kevin Coughlin, Jonathan Walsweer, or Scott Stanley; notable? Is Stacy Meyer notable? Or is it simply Scientology and criticism of Scientology that are notable?; areas that are well-represented here
— User:Justanother, 13:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)