Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anibal Ramos Jr.
The standard for inclusion of city councillors is not that the city is the largest in its own state, or whether its own local newspaper is a notable one or not — ''most'' cities' local newspapers are notable for our purposes, and notability is . To get an automatic presumption of notability just for existing as a city councillor, the person has to serve on the city council of an internationally famous metropolitan global city, such as New York City or Los Angeles or Toronto or London. Outside of that range (''even'' in those cities' own external suburbs), a city councillor qualifies for an article ''only'' if they can be sourced to a depth and volume and geographic range of coverage that marks them out as plainly ''more'' notable than most other city councillors in most other cities. ''Every'' city councillor ''anywhere'' could ''always'' show as much local coverage as any of these contains, because local coverage of municipal politics is quite routinely ''expected'' to exist ''everywhere''. To be kept, the standard all of these people would have to clear is not that they exist, or that they can be sourced to some local coverage — they would have to be shown as significantly ''more'' notable than most other people at this level of political office, and none of these are
— User:Bearcat, 16:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)