Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edouard d'Araille
After perusing it thoroughly on November 29 I tagged the article as insufficiently notable. Since that time, Johnhargreaves added some more sources but none to address the problem of notability, that is, none which would help to satisfy the minimal requirements of . More references were then added by Aldersonsmith, including listings of books at Worldcat and the British National Biography, but these only show that a book exists; they do not help establish notability. Aldersonsmith also asserted that the quote by John Bayley ("Technically fascinating and moving") was made by a man connected to the ''London Review of Books'' and the ''New York Book Review'', however it appears that Bayley's comment was not actually published by those periodicals or by any others. Perhaps the compliment was delivered in person, over the phone or by email. So what we have here is an overwhelming number of references none of which give us traction toward . I have searched the interwebs for traces of dedicated coverage about d'Araille but I have not found anything suitable. Unfortunately I must weigh in with 'delete
— User:Binksternet, 01:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)