Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord of Darkness
why did this go to deletion discussion at all?  The problems with this article could have and should have been handled via citation tags and the article's talk page.  Also, see .  One of the problems cited, "in-universe", is totally incorrect - the article is clearly about a fictional character from a movie.  Most of the article is an articulate and perceptive description of the character and the story in which he is portrayed, which can be verified by simply watching the movie.  The ''primary'' source, the movie (also a "primary source"), is provided in the first sentence. For more about the use of "primary sources" see  and the Wikipedia talk:No original research#Fiction in Wikipedia|debate about fiction on it's talk page.  I've seen the movie, but I appreciate the character "The Dark Lord" more now that I've read this article, which makes me want to see the movie again!  Also, this subject has great potential for expansion, such as including information about that incredible make-up job, who designed it, what it was made of, how long it took to apply, etc.  And I'm certain that Tim Curry had something to say about his role, and that can be included as well.  Definitely a keeper.  Let Illustrious One develop the article further, as he is obviously interested in doing so.  If the article hasn't been improved to your satisfaction within a month, bring it back here
— User:The, 16:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BITE||WP:PSTS (Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers)