Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oddjob's hat
There is little of merit in the nomination which seems only to be based upon the argument-to-avoid of .  The proposition that we can move facts from this article to another page is absurd because deletion would obviously hinder such action and be contrary to our |editing and |licensing policies.  What's needed here, instead, is expansion of the article.  For example, see ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WrzFd0RSaaEC&pg=PA46 Memoir of a Special Effects Maestro'' for detailed technical facts about the prop which have yet to be added to our coverage
— User:Colonel, 19:04, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ITSCRUFT||WP:PRESERVE||WP:GFDL (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)