Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog & Bull
not enough significant coverage from independent reliable sources to pass .  Most of the keep !votes hinge on whether or not Grade II listed buildings meet the auto-notability requirements as per , however, in other discussions on other topics, any classification with so many recipients would fail that test (e.g. Silver Star recipients - approximately 150k). , while saying that buildings "may" be notable due to their historic record, clearly states that these must be backed up "significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability", which is clearly not the case here. I think {{u|Black Kite}}'s suggestion regarding an RFC on grade II buildings is warranted
— User:onel5969, 16:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GEOFEAT||WP:NBUILDING (Wikipedia:Notability)