Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emb
maybe speedy. I had speedied it A7/web, when it was sitting around with no claims of notability or refs other than from its own domain. It now still really doesn't IMO but does cite two other sources. But the expn one (the one that looks to be in-depth) identifies its source as a press-release and the other is a one-sentence mention on a blog of some sort (and again is sourced back to the site being discussed). No independent , no claims of |notability? I'll avoid a delete/recreate war for myself and leave it to other admins consider A7 or let AfD run its course
— User:DMacks, 09:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)