Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of multi-instrumentalists (2nd nomination)
Not seeing any real reason for deletion here. A multi-instrumentalist is not a musician that picks up another instrument once in a while. As we say in our article on the topic, it's a person with a professional level of proficiency in two or more instruments. An inclusion criteria would thus be easy to articulate (e.g. "notable musicians notable for a professional level of proficiency in two or more instruments," possibly requiring sources calling them a "multi-instrumentalist"). It's also a notable topic for a list, having received more than enough coverage (though it doesn't look like notability has been challenged). Being incomplete is explicitly not a valid reason for deletion, nor is being perpetually incomplete. We rarely do complete lists; we do ''encyclopedic'' lists. Every list of ''notable examples'' (including most musician-related lists) is going to be incomplete because they're not supposed to be complete. They're supposed to include what's encompassed by our inclusion criteria (typically ). &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 18:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CSC (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)