Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silentlambs
The searching by Pburka is convincing. The organization has received widespread, national coverage. If someone were to add all those additional links to the page, it would become instantly, obviously verified and notable. If some people (like the nominator) feel the article is not neutral in its tone, that can be fixed by editing, but we can't suppress all mention of a verified, notable organization just because we don't like its viewpoint. And "being biased" is not one of the reasons for deletion. Per , "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion." BTW any editing which is introduced for balance has to be properly sourced. Argument, personal opinion, blog comments, etc. are not adequate sourcing and not acceptable as content
— User:MelanieN, 22:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)