Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bone spectacles
The article cites six sources, mostly described as in Persian (presumably Farsi).  I would guess that these consist of an archaeological report of '''1962''' on the excavation and one article interpreting the find, whose conclusions have then been repeated in several books - tertiary sources, but still potentailly , and in a 2010 journal that might only be a trade rag - I may be wrong.  The excavation report will be a .  The interpretation article is presumably from an academic source, which will also be .  Whehter the interpretation is correct is a different question, but without a source that questions it, a WP article doubting the conclusions would be .  I agree that the find is an oddity, but if not spectacales, what is it
— User:Peterkingiron, 16:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)