Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army.ca
The website in question has had mention in radio, tv, and print news (references cited in the article) and so meets  Furthermore, it cannot be ignored that the sole champion of deletion is constantly editing the article in an attempt to remove or discredit the citations that enable the meeting of , and it is a matter of record that this user was recently banned from the website in question which causes grave doubts about his good faith in editing. While it may not be the strongest case for  complience ever seen on Wikipedia, the fact that there 'are' cited instances of national media reports on this website, coupled to the dubious nature of both the deletion request and the subsequent editing pattern, seems to me to make a strong case for retention - at least for now. Perhaps it can be revisited in 6 months, when the disgruntled editor has moved on to other targets and the article contents will have stabilized
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:WEB||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)