Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deaths related to Scientology
I completely disagree that "related to" in this AFD |"present the appearance of support for statements but can deny the reader the opportunity to assess the source of the viewpoint" the article actually is "clearly attributed" through |reliable sources and provides the reader the opportunity to see where those claims come from.  As I said, the lede and background sections of this article demonstrate that "deaths related to scientology" is not a weasel concept (use of obscure language to hide the fact that the source is not given), but rather is attributed to many different reliable sources over a period of 30 years. There are many articles that paint a disturbing picture of a group or organization from which there are two different sides, but those articles are written like this one with due consideration given to weight and | neutrality (note that neutrality does not mean that if two sides are present you pick the one that is not critical, rather that you write your article giving equal weight to the reliable sources as they are presented).  No one has been able to say that this article skews the reliable sources, only sees one set of reliable sources disregarding other sources on this topic, or provides an undue weight on one set of sources.  therefore the article does provide a POV.  Oh and there is a The Holocaust|Deaths related to Nazism article, but I am not sure what the inclusion rules are over there
— User:Coffeepusher, 15:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEASEL||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)