Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual predator
I have a few problems with the proposed rationale for deletion.  First of all, not having an article on one topic does not mean we must not have one on this.  Instead of just posting  I might also elaborate that ''Dateline'' is a little more prestigious than The Register, which is described as an "opinion website" in addition to whatever else it does.  Being a politically loaded term does not disqualify it from being on Wikipedia, nor is a lack of "scholarly" references, since notability does, in fact, stem from the fact that something has been noted in well-known sources (''e.g.'', mainstream media, not limited to tabloids).  The concept of a sexual predator, finally, is absolutely not synonymous with a perpetrator of childhood sexual abuse, since a predator may not limit the scope of his/her victims to children; this would be an improper redirect
— User:Zahakiel, 23:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WAX (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)