Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Luxury Cars
Lists and categories may duplicate coverage.  I don't feel that it constitutes original research to compile a list like this as all it requires is finding a secondary source (say, Road and Track) to declare the car to be a luxury car and then it goes on the list.  If, perhaps, we were making a list of "ranking of luxury cars from best to worst" or "list of unappreciated luxury cars" or something along those lines, we would be right to declare the article OR.  As it stands the list is exceedingly bare (and includes an open wheeled race car...), so I'm not worried about the list introducing editorial content.  I've advocated deletion of lists in the past without some "unifying secondary document", but I don't think this list needs one.  Literally all we are looking as is "Luxury yes/no" for inclusion.  As for claims of , I'm not so sure.  IINFO is there to prevent lists of arbitrary classification or minimal standards from ballooning--an article on "Russian expatriates" or an article on "the times someone said 'centipede' on a TV show" would fit under this category.  In this case the list can't possibly (by definition) be more indiscriminate than the List of cars. This one is a keeper
— User:Protonk, 05:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IINFO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)