Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor planets: 500001–501000
the Meanings of Names articles. Massive  to the irresponsible person who mass-created scores of literally empty articles that couldn't even be theoretically filled since these have only numeric names. '''Delete''' other lower-numbered Meanings of Names articles that do have some namesakes, which are copied directly from the respective citations already provided in the main lists. Perhaps the main lists could have a column for 'Named after', but we do not need to have articles just to copy and paste the primary source for something not covered by tertiary sources; the Citation column links to the meanings page through a repetition of the name, but it's unclear what warrants the duplication or what makes this a citation – both have the same JPL link in the Ref column. '''Weak keep''' the main planet lists: Yes there's a lot of them but I believe these were a compromise as a way to cover scientific information without having articles on individual asteroids, though there are still quite a few of them e.g. 4585 Ainonai that are certainly not notable, all sources being databases of stats without . These should be redirected to the lists with linked citations
— User:Reywas92, 19:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TROUT||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout)