Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Ho
all sources are from Reddit, which is definitely not the most |reliable of sources. Based on the fact that the channel also only has 61 subscribers, I would not consider that "famous" as the Reddit threads state. I also went through all 5 pages of Google results for "TheOmegaLeaf" and "Bradley Ho" (had more than 5 pages, none appeared to be RS & related), only to discover no reliable sources. Additionally (in the case of the former), Google's news tab does not return anything. While I would certainly not rule out the fact that he could become famous tomorrow (anyone ''could'', just odds are against it) - and if that was the case and tonnes of reliable sources suddenly pop up that weren't there when I did the search, I would happily change my !vote - I do not think that there is enough notability to warrant an article at this time and if it were sent through AfC and I reviewed it, it would most definitely have been declined
— User:TheSandDoctor, 22:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)