Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soz (rapper)
worthy of note, the policy does specify that "conversely, meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept." That said, I'm not sure that the article ''does'' meet any of them. Specifically, criterion 1 indicates "multiple non-trivial published works". I don't see that criterion made. Billboard is a mirror of AMG. That leaves two: the San Mateo Daily Journal and a magazine article that is not verifiable. This doesn't strike me as "multiple non-trivial published works". Touring requires a national or international tour; there's no assertion of that (so possibly #4 means also possibly not—and regardless, it's not |verified); 6th does not says "significant association with" but "contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable". #11—maybe—but it's lacking verification. And that's the most compelling problem. As  says, "to meet Wikipedia:Attribution, the article in question must actually document that the criterion is true. It is not enough to make vague claims in the article or assert a band's importance on a talk page or AfD page -- the article itself must document notability". Where are the |reliable sources? I can't find them, and I have spent a good bit of time looking. Unless somebody does, the article doesn't pass muster
— User:Moonriddengirl, 01:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:MUSIC||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)