Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Vithoulkas
lets cool this for a moment because the last thing we need is a battle. Articles to be included in Wikipedia need to fulfill certain policies and guidelines, where the adhering to the policies is mandatory and the adherence to guidelines a question of debate. The first policy is , whereby it has to be proven by second party sources that a subject is notable. The second would be  which says that the content of an article has to be attributable to a second party source. Our problem is that, as is, this article fails at least  because we can hardly say that the Society of Homeopaths would be a second party source as Dr. (Mr.) Vithoulkas would be a member of it. We cannot say that a book written by the person is a second party source. What does certainly not work is first party sources, as any of these would fall under . I am always happy to be wrong about the notability of a person but I cannot take the word from someone for it, I need sources
— user:Alf_photoman, 19:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:A||WP:N||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)