Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poison In The Grapes
Fails to meet , ; nothing on Google Scholar for either workhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Poison+In+The+Grapes%22 or directorhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Matthew+Berdyck%22 (as opposed to say, John Pilger https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22John+Pilger%22 and his Cambodia documentaryhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Year+Zero%3A+the+Silent+Death+of+Cambodia%22, for example). Has no awards, recognition, nor run in major festivals etc. Fails a basic Google test (all SEO, nothing independent) so claim of ''"get national media attention"'' falls flat at best. I'm sure the |COI IP thinks they're important, too bad no one else seems to share the sentiment and that's why there is no {{underlined|significant}} coverage for the work. Wikipedia in an encyclopedia with inclusion criteria, this fails to meet even the most basic of them. As for what seems like a THREAT and WIKIBULLYING to get their way with ''"If I want media I can have media.  This is all going to back fire on you."'': be my guest. I '''{{underlined|love}}''' hearing about myself; make sure to mention me by name. ;) But it will most likely not end the way you think it will (and if there was actual media coverage, the point would be moot anyway). --&nbsp
— User:Dsprc, 02:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NFILM||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)