Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Bologna
I haven't counted, but it seems about half the keep !votes rely on various |arguments to avoid. (It's useful! People are talking about him! He's a bad guy! Look at Google!) The closing admin should weigh these very little, if at all, especially given the external |canvassing mentioned above. The 2005 ''Downtown Express'' and 2010 DNAinfo.com fluff pieces amount to insignificant coverage in unreliable sources. The 2010 ''Daily News'' piece contains only trivial mention. The rest is just |coverage of one event or non-notable dirt dug up in response to that event. His order to arrest some guy in 2004 doesn't come close to being a |notable event. The |coatracking seems to have been mostly addressed, but |BLP1E still mandates deletion
— User:Lagrange613, 00:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATA||WP:CANVASS||WP:BLP1E||WP:EVENT||WP:COATRACK||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)