Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Gilchrist
WP:ATHLETE isn't the whole story—a person may still meet  to be notable.  I admit it seems very early to have an article on this kid, and I'm generally the first to nominate articles about school-age athletes who are supposedly going to be the next big thing.  However, I think I'm pretty much swayed by coverage at http://insider.espn.go.com/ncb/recruiting/tracker/player?recruitId=54118&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f ESPN, the http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-165975959/he-got-game-13.html Philadelphia Inquirer, and a variety of other places Google News will show you.  I can't go with a full-on "keep" recommendation though because to the extent he's currently notable it's still only because of his future prospects, and, in my mind at least, for encyclopedic purposes that's not the same as being notable for current or past deeds
— User:Glenfarclas, 00:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)