Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human disguise (2nd nomination)
sourcing is fine in the article. ''The article has no references from  that establish '' is clearly bogus as the article is well sourced.  One can argue that the cites aren't entirely on topic, but the nom didn't do so (and I think they are fine).  The other issues raised by the nom are in the "shades of gray" of policy (is this indiscriminate? I don't think so, etc.) In any case, it meets all of our inclusion guidelines
— User:Hobit, 18:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)