Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conspiracy theories of the United States presidential election, 2016
Fails |notability.  In order to establish notability, it must be shown that someone has written about the |topic of conspiracy theories in the U.S. presidential election, not that various journalists have written about various individual theories.  "Conspiracy theory" has a specific meaning in the literature, but journalists may stretch it.  So for example the theory that Ted Cruz could not become president because he was born in Canada has been described as a conspiracy theory but is actually a |fringe theory.  The theory that Clinton's concussion affected her cognitive abilities is either an unfounded or malicious rumor.  What we need is a source that explains what is meant by a conspiracy theory and outlines some examples from the 2016 election.  And we need to know before we add anything that the author is talking about the same topic.  If no one in reliable sources has chosen to write about the topic of this article then it lacks notability.  The fact that we can find numerous examples where someone has called one theory or other a conspiracy theory (the "but we have sources!" argument) is insufficient to meet notability guidelines.  Otherwise we could have articles such as "Republican sex offenders," "Democrat thieves," "Liberals who text pictures of their genitals," etc.  Each of these articles would be a |point of view nightmare, wasting editors' time edit-warring and on talk page arguments, which has happened here
— User:The, 21:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY||WP:TOPIC||WP:FRINGE||WP:POV (Wikipedia:Notability)