Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sant Kaur Bajwa (2nd nomination)
Yes, one ''could'' argue that Sant Kaur Bajwa has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and that she would therefore pass . But taking a closer look at this guideline, one finds that not only the mere existence of media coverage is demanded, but also '''encyclopedic suitability''' of the subject in question. And I dare say that this is not met here: Just ''claiming'' to be very old, without a definite proof, is not sufficient (also because of ). Please note that |Wikipedia is not a newspaper. This means that being featured in some kind of a news source does not automatically call for a Wikipedia article. All coverage is about her death, so that one could further argue that she is only notable for |one event (dunno if "death" is applicable here, though). In any case  also comes to mind: There has not been any ''ongoing'' news coverage; what we are talking about here is a relatively short news spike. To sum it up, even though there are reasonable sources, she should not be included into Wikipedia because there is just no "raison d'être
— User:FoxyOrange, 23:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E||WP:EVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)