Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starship Troupers
most SF works are reviewed in ''Locus'' and one or more of the pulps; that doesn't make them necessarily fit the standard set out in  of ''"The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary."''. ''LJ'' qualifies as a "work serving a general audience"; but not sure the others really do (except for trufen like myself). Heck, otherwise I'd argue that every book I reviewed for ''Dragon (magazine)|Dragon'' was thus made notable
— User:Orangemike, 22:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: :WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)