Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Schlossberg (5th nomination)
He has also written opinion pieces for http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/03/opinion/jfks-legacy-as-seen-by-his-grandson.html?_r=0 the New York Times, http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/04/23/kennedy-politics-bush-congress-clinton-column/8047957/ USAToday and http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jack-schlossberg/profiles-in-courage-in-our-time_b_5213634.html the Huffington Post.  is an essay, not policy, and states ''This is why notability is usually neither inherited nor inherent: inherited and inherent notability claims can't be verified with evidence'' which is not true in this case as notability can be verified by third-party sources. These sources should not be dismissed because of the activity Kennedy was involved in as ''notability is a property of a subject'' and it doesn't matter if editors consider the activities covered by those sources not to be notable in themselves. Also, , which is a guideline, states ''For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:FAILN (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)