Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis and Critique
ping|Anna Comnena}} Unfortunately |journal notability is a tricky thing since their importance tends to be based on the extent to which their contents are cited/referenced rather than how often people write ''about the journal''. That's part of why we have the indexing possibility for establishing notability. But that's not to say indexing is the only way. The |general notability guideline can apply to any article. That requires significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. The first link you shared above is from a school where the editor works (and says as much), so we can't consider that one. Nor where people claim credit for publications there because these aren't neutral/objective sources -- they have a professional interest in mentioning it. Sometimes a large collection of high profile citations of a journal in top tier publications has been enough to establish notability here, but if those aren't there, if the indexing requirement isn't met, and if there aren't enough sources about the subject, it's going to be |too soon for an article. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 21:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NJOURNAL||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)