Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of popular Internet services
this boils down to two issues: 1)  and 2) the content of the article.  To me, the OR argument doesn't hold water because all of this information is searchable and retrievable through various sources.  I find it highly unlikely that individual editors are using this as the source of their original research.  As for the content of the article, those are all ''editing'' issues and not ''deletion'' issues. Therefore, I say we keep it
— User:Paulmcdonald, 19:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)