Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitty (cricketer)
The key policy here is  which states that "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page ... Articles that are short and unlikely to be expanded could be merged into larger articles or lists.''"  Some good improvements have been made to the page in the course of discussion per  and so we see that such improvement is feasible and so the page should be kept for further development.    is only a guideline and so is weaker than this policy, but, in considering the notability issues, it is clear that CRIC takes precedence over  per the legal principle ''Lex specialis|lex specialis derogat legi generali''.  The detail about the number of players in the game is irrelevant because, when first-class cricket was formally defined in 1947, its formula was explicitly not retrospective and so the status of earlier games was not changed.  The game in question was clearly of top quality, being from an era when ''https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Jubilee_Book_of_Cricket/Chapter_10 the county was so strong ... that Surrey frequently had to contend against Fourteen of England
— user:Andrew, 07:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:HEY||WP:N||WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)