Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Kuhrt
As director of ministry for the Archbishops' Council of the Church of England, he is quoted in quite a few articles in ''The Times'', ''The Daily Telegraph'', ''The Financial Times'', ''The Sunday Telegraph'', certainly more than an ordinary archdeacon would be. He is considered as one of four English evangelical scholars in the second half of the 20th century, and his book ''An Introduction to Christian Ministry'' discussed, in ''Priesthood in a New Millennium: Toward an Understanding of Anglican Presbyterate in the Twenty-First Century'' https://books.google.com.au/books?id=a2W3AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218&dq=%22Gordon+Kuhrt%22&source=bl&ots=FWAlOlNydc&sig=ACfU3U1BU31N4cr-ryqMvY5PlWZzFuCjCA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjMk5iP4-TmAhWNdn0KHQWcCT84FBDoATAEegQIChAB#v=onepage&q=%22Gordon%20Kuhrt%22&f=false. There is a review of his book ''Life’s Not Always Easy'' (not in the article yet) in ''Fulcrum'' https://www.fulcrum-anglican.org.uk/articles/review-of-lifes-not-always-easy-by-gordon-kuhrt/, and the views presented in his book ''An Introduction to Christian Ministry'' are criticised in an article 'Beware the bureaucrats' in the ''Church Times'' https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2005/5-august/comment/beware-the-bureaucrats, though it is Indicative Reading in a Master of Theology in Chaplaincy Studies at Cardiff University https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b0013668ab7225ab8cfc75b/t/5b0458de758d46ba387a13bf/1527011554463/MTh_Chap_Handbook_2015.pdf. The book ''Paul on Baptism: Theology, Mission and Ministry in Context'' gives his book ''Believing In Baptism'' in Suggested Reading, as a "useful popular book  ... widely respected and valued" https://books.google.com.au/books?id=ffhTDwAAQBAJ&pg=PR24&lpg=PR24&dq=Kuhrt+%22Believing+In+Baptism%22&source=bl&ots=m_veQDWtGp&sig=ACfU3U0BTrvoBaoveoc0Iox4g-7OxHYs-Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjamKX_6OTmAhUFXn0KHZbzDbc4ChDoATAAegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=Kuhrt%20%22Believing%20In%20Baptism%22&f=false, and there's a review of that book in ''Churchman'' http://churchsociety.org/docs/churchman/102/Cman_102_4_Reviews.pdf (p 380), and the editorial in ''The Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology'' (Spring 1989) is almost a review of it, certainly discusses it and recommends his approach https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/sbet/07-1.pdf, and this issue of the journal has an actual review of it (p 58) http://docplayer.net/154580011-16-the-protestant-dogmaticians-and-the-late-princeton-school-on-the-status-of-the-sacred-apographa-theodore-p-letis-university-of-edinburgh.html. I think he meets , with reviews/discussions of 3 of his books, and is close to meeting #4 "Were recognized by their peers as an authoritative source on religious matters/writing
— User:RebeccaGreen, 12:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NAUTHOR||WP:RELPEOPLE (Wikipedia:Notability)