Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Matthew Pinson
I have read the debate above and I find the delete votes, citing  as guidance to whether he's likely to be notable, to have a much more firm grounding in evidence and policy. Keep !voters cite a prominence in theology, in particular arminianism, but no evidence was supplied that he is noted amongst peers or especially recognised as such in independent sources. I also concur that the college in question doesn't qualify as a "major institution", and I see no evidence that the term is defined anywhere. As an aside, it would probably be worth nailing down at  what that actually means. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp
— User:Amakuru, 16:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)