Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people and organizations associated with Dominionism (2nd nomination)
My reading of  is that it would not apply here.  Wikipedia should absolutely be free of censorship ... an article being offensive is not a reason to delete an article.  My support of deletion (and as I am reading in general, those of most people opposing deletion) is that this article is written in such a way that anyone in a community of scholars who wants to say "so-and-so acts as if (s)he is a dominionist" makes this list, even if the scholarship is on shaky ground
— User:LonelyBeacon, 15:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CENSOR (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)