Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panos Papasoglu
For this area, MathSciNet is the more appropriate tool to use. He has 14 papers listed there, five of which have numbers of citations in the 10-20 range (not exceptional, but not bad for mathematics papers — my experience is that mathematics citation numbers tend to be smaller than some other subjects and that MathSciNet numbers of citations tend to be less than half of the Google scholar numbers for the same papers). Several of the reviews are unusually long and thorough: a typical review there is just a one-paragraph abstract, often copied from the original paper's abstract, but {{MR|1346209}}, {{MR|2221253}}, and {{MR|2300450}} are signed reviews (by three different reviewers) that are considerably longer than that. I'm not convinced this is enough to show a pass of  #1, but it at least demonstrates that he is a successful working research mathematician
— User:David, 20:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)