Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luthic
to List of Dungeons & Dragons deities or '''delete'''.  Either is acceptable.  I agree with Simone.  There has been no credible, policy-based argument for keeping this article.  It boils down to  or zealous inclusionism.  The article does not satisfy the , and it does not matter whether TTN uses a boilerplate or not.  There are no independent, secondary sources, and the article is even helpfully tagged with PRIMARY.  I don't see how any any of DGG's arguments are true.  Dragon, TSR, and Wizards of the Coast are all trademarks of the publisher.  How are there any secondary sources
— User:NinjaRobotPirate, 11:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)