Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenRA
as teetering on the edge of passing  with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources. http://www.macworld.co.uk/download/games/openra-playtest-v20150830-3330349/ MacWorld looks good, but it's by the same author (Mike Williams) that a bunch of other articles on OpenRA are. http://www.kotaku.com.au/2015/10/tiberian-sun-is-getting-added-to-the-command-conquer-fan-remake/ Kotaku looks okay, though its focus is 50/50 on Tiberian Sun itself and the engine. Unsure how we treat TB reviews for RS purposes, but it's an okay supplement since he has credentials. http://betanews.com/2011/12/15/get-back-to-basic-and-really-fun-gameplay-with-retro-style-openra-and-ufoai/ BetaNews is not in-depth,  I wouldn't call it a reliable source, and I can't find author's (Mike Williams) credentials. http://www.gry-online.pl/S030.asp?ID=45035 Gry is not in-depth, but okay otherwise. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Play-Classic-Remakes-on-Linux-of-C-C-Tiberian-Dawn-C-C-Red-Alert-and-Dune-2000-447566.shtml Softpedia is a download site and so interested in reviewing what they host -- I would class this as not really independent or reliable. http://www.downloadcrew.com/article/26446-openra DownloadCrew is a copy-paste from MacWorld, definitely unreliable. The rest are passing mentions. Overall, it feels , but I expect major outlets will cover it at some point when it gets its 5 minute spotlight. —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 22:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)