Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asel Asleh
with provisions) I don't see this being against WP:ONEVENT. That notability guideline "discourage Wikipedia from having separate articles on people playing minor roles in major events or major roles in minor events." His death was a major enough event if it is true that "The day after his death, 30,000 people followed Asel's body to the cemetery where it was buried"http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/10/07/asel/index.html (I'm skeptical of anythign from Salon personally). His death had spikes in coverage at the time, a couple years later after the inquiry, and passing mentions since then in the search for sources link in Google News shown above. That shows ongoing coverage from reliable sources of a national and international scope. That means that NOTNEWS is certainly questionable as reason for deletion. It appears that his death meets the General Notability Guidelines. Al that being said, the article should be retitled ("Death of Asel Asleh") since he was not notable but his death was. The scope of this article also needs to be his death and the background information should not over weight that (although sources do include his background to a decent extent it looks like) The article also needs sources to verify what ti is saying and a quick check for POV just to be on the safe side. If these things are not done then there may be enough concern to delete it per  (part of  which is mentioned as reasoning at 
— User:Cptnono, 01:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTESSAY||WP:NOT||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)