Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quackpotwatch
fails . Plenty of Ghits, but they seem to mostly be attacking (or praising) the subject. I couldn't find any independent "non-trivial published works," signs that it "has won a well known and independent award," or any indication that content is "distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators." Not-notable. Also, I'm suspicious of how all but one of the sources cited come from the same place. And all but one of the external links in this article come from the same two people. This seems to be a non-notable feud of narrow scope. Not encyclopedic
— User:Scorpiondollprincess, 19:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)