Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bank Identification Numbers
passes , , . The argument to keep it is that this information does not appear to be compliled by a more authorative source or otherwise readily accessible. The recently added citation is a partial replacement at best. Neither my bank or VISA provide a similar list. This information constitutes a valuable fraud prevention tool, allowing a  merchant to identify which bank needs to be contacted for timely transaction inquiries.The information is verifiable () either on the bank's website or by phoning the bank directly. The information is neutral (). And it passes (teniously) . The article would be stronger and more authoritative if sources were cited. But it's positive utility argues that we should keep it unless a more authoritative source can replace it or significant harm can be argued. A disclaimer regarding citations continues to be appropriate.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Iredato, 22:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTE||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)