Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emergency Aeromedical Service
It's not clear from the nom what notability criteria is being applied, but to my understanding the subject would seem to meet the GNG and ORG criteria. Relative to the GNG criteria,  would seem to be met as there is seemingly non-trivial coverage across various independent outlets and a broad span of dates that deal with the subject specifically. For example, the following sources represent non-trivial coverage (these are not "passing references" in which the subject is mentioned fleetingly, but coverage on and about the subject itself): http://utv.ie/News/2015/06/11/Air-ambulance-marks-1000-rescues-in-three-years-38923 http://clareherald.com/2015/02/air-ambulance-in-695-missions-in-2014-98051/ http://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/pilot-review-confirms-need-for-permanent-air-ambulance-service-1.1629930 http://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/52677/air-ambulance-service-flies-first-patient-to-uhg http://www.thejournal.ie/air-ambulance-1784403-Nov2014/ http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/busy-year-for-air-ambulance-as-103-missions-completed-1.1641359 http://www.thesun.ie/irishsol/homepage/irishfeatures/6865856/Inside-the-elite-emergency-aeromedical-service-You-realise-how-vital-we-are-when-you-meet-those-weve-saved.html http://www.limerickleader.ie/news/local-news/115541/Air-ambulance-service-has--saved.html. On ORG, these types of sources would seem to equally demonstrate the ,  and  criteria for sources establishing ORG notability. Perhaps additional sources of this type might be added to the article. However that notwithstanding, I'm not sure I am following what NN criteria is unmet here
— User:Guliolopez, 22:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:AUD||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)