Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Islamic Library
Sorry, I don't see it: almost all the sources listed are primary, and none of the others meet , and we can wave off any  arguments. Meeting the GNG doesn't come close to meaning that there "might" be sources that "suggest" notability.  Either there are reliable, ''independent, third-party'' sources that discuss the subject in detail or there are not.  We don't get to keep conditional articles.  If this one doesn't have such sources, then userfy it to the creator until it does
— [[User talk:NukeThePukes|Nha Trang]], 22:09, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IRS||WP:ITSUSEFUL (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)