Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treat Myself
The album still has enough coverage to exist on its own. The album being delayed and not having a release date or track listing does not invalidate the previous news articles about it that are present on the article already, so there absolutely still ''is'' a claim to notability. If there weren't, it would be a candidate for speedy deletion. It also passes  because of its sufficient independent news coverage. There is no confirmation that all the songs that, at the time they were released were confirmed as being on the album, have been scrapped, or that Trainor has thrown all the intended tracks for it out. It's just been delayed, which happens to albums quite a lot. We're not speculating on its release date or year, so I believe it also steers clear of  stating that Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable content nor is it a crystal ball. It's fine to stay put as a "this was the status of the album and what was on it last we knew". Before I am accused of making  arguments, let us just ''bear in mind'' that there are currently albums with mainspace articles that are basically in stasis with the last details we knew about them still intact because they've been delayed or the artist claims they have "retired", that were also nominated for deletion and kept. I mention these because this album's status is very much the same and can be considered on its own merits to be kept. If other details come to light, then we can change the articles. If they are explicitly cancelled, we can react accordingly. The EP's release does not invalidate the existence of the album either, because it's not intended as a replacement. If it were, then we would just move this to there
— User:Ss112, 08:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NALBUMS||WP:TOOSOON||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Notability)