Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Allan Feldman
per nom, Bearcat and . As a creator and editor of several different articles about minor-party and lesser-known candidates, I would really like to say "keep". However, after a closer look at of the sources provided (and a search for others), I have to conclude that the assessments of the delete !voters are correct. The vast majority of the sources are either: primary; provide no significant coverage of the subject, only a mention or passing reference; are written or created ''by'' the subject, rather than independent coverage ''about'' the subject; or are non-|RS (e.g. the blog Irregular Times). That leaves us with only a modicum of mainly local coverage about his current campaign, and these fall under . It has already pointed that just an being an unelected candidate is not enough - in and of itself - to achieve notability under . In the event that he actually wins the Libertarian nomination for president, the article should be recreated as he will then be the nominee of a notable party on the ballot in enough states to have at least a mathematical possibility of winning the election. For the time being though, sorry to say, he's just not notable
— User:Cojovo, 21:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:10YT||WP:RS||WP:RECENTISM||WP:NPOL (Wikipedia:Recentism)