Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNU/Linux naming controversy
we don't delete articles because they're "difficult to write about while taking an NPOV", unless someone deleted everything in :Category:Politics without telling me. This article is reasonably well written, well sourced with primary sources (but does need some help with secondary sources, which Crisco has made the first step towards above), and as far as I can see doesn't actually have any NPOV issues. I would also dispute the notability claims made by Nanobear. This seems to pass  - just because primary sources are used extensively in the article does not mean the secondary sources do not exist
— User:Boulevardier, 13:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)