Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food Justice
or '''Userfy''' -- the article, as is, has significant problems, as noted above (|POV; too many inadequate |sources; and, ).  However, as the authors correctly point out, significant improvement from when I first suggested to Userfy  (revised ).  The subject is notable because of coverage in secondary sources.  Although we do have just a tiny little section Food_security#Food_Justice_Movement that the best material could be merged to, ultimately this subject is significant enough that it will need its own article.  So it seems a wasted effort to merge and then have to separate again later.  {{pb}} Instead, it would be better to get the students to fix the article to comply with our standards.  If this was indeed part of a school assignment, we should do outreach to the instructor to explain our sourcing standards and the problem with , not delete the students' hard work. That outreach has occurred. added
— User:David, 04:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)