Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lopadotemachoselachogaleokranioleipsanodrimhypotrimmatosilphiokarabomelitokatakechymenokichlepikossyphophattoperisteralektryonoptekephalliokigklopeleiolagoiosiraiobaphetraganopterygon
The rationale is bad, but I am not seeing sources that suggest the topic is |notable, outside of it being in the Guiness book of records. But most Guiness records don't need separata articles, just inclusion on some list. But considering the flood of speedy keeps above, this may be a trainwreck (depends on whether the discussion closer reads the arguments, because they are not particularly impressive either). I suggest this is speedy closed and renominated to discuss the subject's notability
— User:Piotrus, 08:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)