Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming
or '''Draftify.''' Ohhh, dear. This is like... oof. Idk. Basically, my hot take on this list is pretty simple: a notable scientist who disagrees with the overwhelming consensus on climate change is decently interesting while a scientist who accepts the consensus is... well just like the rest of 'em. I disagree with how the list is formatted (it should be more patently obvious what it is these folks are saying and how and why most aren't qualified to say it), but that is more of a matter for clean up than anything.Honestly, this feels more like a  arguement, but I'll just say what's on my mind. It's probably going to be either (1) we publish this list and get to inject necessary context for who these people are or (2) climate deniers publish this sorta list and make it sound like there is this huge secret group of dissenters that The Left™ doesn't want you to know about. I think people ought to know that these climate denying scientists happen to include Keith E. Idso the Botany|botanist and David Deming the geology|geologist.We need a better list, though. Maybe I'll clean this up later just for the fun of it. Were I to do so, I would probably use sources like these.https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.118-a536https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/feb/27/just-who-are-these-300-scientists-telling-trump-to-burn-the-climatehttps://foreignpolicy.com/2010/02/26/the-fp-guide-to-climate-skeptics/https://weather.com/science/environment/news/2018-11-29-climate-deniers-found-themselves-on-tvhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09959-4 My point is that there is a right way to do this, but this currently doesn't reflect that. &#8211
— User:MJL, 20:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)