Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaxFlame 2
Just to be clear, so far no valid reason has been given to delete this article. At least that's how I perceive it, correct me if I'm wrong. Just claiming that it's unencyclopedic is vague and not valid (see 
— User:Slaapwel, 11:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNENCYC (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)