Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedra Bistodeau
I agree, Brain, that there's mischaracterization (to the point of trivialization) of Sedra going on here, from the very beginning -- to the point where'd I'd support a clean-sheet relisting of this AfD just to get the discussion off on the right foot.  However, there are weaknesses on the Keep side, too.  For example, the "non-trivial, published source" you point to above has an "artist bio" of only a couple paragraphs -- and for Sally O'Reilly, not Sedra.  (The title lists them both, Sedra first, confusingly.)  So who's really the '''subject'''?  My heart says "Keep", but my head keeps going back to  (a guideline that's pretty new to me, admittedly) to see if she can somehow get across the notability line on ''points''.   And I can't quite see it yet. Let's say it comes down to the competitions.  What counts as a "major competition"?   doesn't say.  Maddening
— User:Yakushima, 10:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:MUSICBIO||WP:MUSICBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)