Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigme (Kagyu lama)
The reason it has been open for two weeks is because an admin has looked at the article and found it wanting. Most of the references are self-published. The ones that have been added are profile pages, they aren't under editorial control or peer reviewed and are probably invalid per . There is no real secondary sources, that are independent, in-depth and reliable. The only reason I didn't comment up until today as I saw an article in The Times about Akong Rinpoche and thought their might be some link to it here, but not found anything.  There is a good para in one book, but its not-independent. It don't believe at this time, that Jigme (Kagyu lama)|Jigme Rinpoche is notable. It doesn't satisfy 
— User:scope_creep, 08:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:BLPSOURCES (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)