Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest H. Rosasco
The core notability test for mayors is  #2, "major local political figures who have received significant press coverage" —  is just a clarifying statement, not the notability test in and of itself. Mayors are not always automatically kept just because they existed; they're kept if they can be |reliably sourced as the ''subject'' of enough ''media'' coverage to clear . But the only source here is his own alma mater, supporting only the fact that he graduated from there, with no substance and no sourcing being shown at all for his notability ''as a politician'' — and North Adams is ''not'' large or prominent enough to hand him an automatic ''presumption'' of notability in the ''absence'' of any valid sourcing. A mayor of North Adams could certainly be kept if the article were well-sourced and substantive, but there's no need to keep a primary-sourced stub that just says "he existed, the end". No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do much better than this
— User:Bearcat, 20:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)