Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Leadership and Management
We are here to decide on notability. Not having independent sources is not a reason for deletion and does not contravene  - this is not an article about a minor celebrity or band which is likely to attract fancruft. The organisation's official website is not automatically an unreliable source unless it makes outrageous claims, which this one clearly doesn't. Professional associations in major countries are usually considered to be notable. I can see no reason not to give this one the benefit of the doubt. Apart from anything else, it is part of the highly respected City & Guilds organisation and awards nationally recognised qualifications
— User:Necrothesp, 14:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)