Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikil Murugan
for being a publicist dealing with and promoting notable others, is not in and of itself a particularly notable field.  ''India Today'' may applaud his expertise by calling him the http://www.extramirchi.com/movies/nikhil-murugan-best-pro-in-south-cinema-india-today/ best public relations officer in South Indian cinema, but that is not itself a notable accolade. And the http://www.filmibeat.com/tamil/news/2009/nikhil-murugan-pro-040809.html ''Filmibeat'' citation simply repeats that and shares more about his regular job as a P.R.O. Yes, he does get a lot written about him in https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Nikil+Murugan%22&tbm=nws multiple reliable sources, but his press coverage is |entirely dependent upon what he has done for others as a job. The article is itself quite |promotional and lacks |neutrality. The |A7 speedy was because it was thought the former article did not have a clear assertion of notability, '''but''' this one does include sourcing which makes such a claim. However, this AFD is best so as to have others offer input toward the reasonableness of the claim and whether or not it is a notability
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 17:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INHERITED||WP:PROMOTION||WP:NPOV||WP:A7 (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)