Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissident Voice (third nomination)
It's been eight months since the most recent nomination.  In all that time, it hasn't progressed beyond the unsourced stub that existed back then, and has had all of about three meaningful edits.  Arkyan's reasoning is sound, and frankly, I'm unimpressed with the argument in previous AfDs that dissident publications have a hard time finding sources which satisfy .  Notable ones manage just fine
— User:Ravenswing, 16:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATT (Wikipedia:Attribution)