Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auli'i Cravalho
EmWinn, your first point is basically , which isn't a valid reason for keeping an article. Peter Ostrum has a long article precisely because independent sources have been writing about him for 45 years after his only film role and he has maintained his notability over that period. Had Wikipedia existed in 1971 and someone created an article on Ostrum, there's every chance it would have been put up for deletion as WP:TOOSOON as well. You also state "there is a lot of interest in the actress" but you have only provided evidence of interest in the movie via number of page views, not in her. And you say "she is likely to become well known" – that's just speculation at this point, per 
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:CRYSTALBALL (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)