Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitor Coutinho Flora
Passing , no matter how slim the margin, gives the subject of an article a presumption of notability.  That shifts the burden to the editors that think the article should be deleted (if such a shift didn't occur, then there would be no point to SNGs).  While it is impossible to prove a negative (i.e., that sources don't exist), editors wanting deletion must do more work than a mere 5 minute Google search - they must show that a full effort was made to find sources.  In view of , it would be challenging for English speaking editors that do not live in Brasil or Latvia to truly evaluate sources.  This differs, for example, from the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Sinclair (footballer born 1991)|Scott Sinclair (referenced above) where it is a lot easier for English speakers to try and find sources.  Unless multiple editors fluent in Portuguese and Latvian perform truly detailed searches (more than the first few pages from Google), then I don't think the presumption is invalidated and we presume  is met.  Again, the community has set  and we should respect the standard they set until shown in this case the standard is not valid
— User:RonSigPi, 05:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NSPORT||WP:BIAS||WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY (Wikipedia:Notability)