Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Parker Square
to Matt Parker. Potential future notability is not grounds for notability now; being a "legitimate finding of a well-known mathematician" (even assuming without granting the latter) is hardly sufficient for a stand-alone article. There are literally thousands of "legitimate findings" by well-known mathematicians every year, yet few have their own page. If this turns out to drive a lot of traffic or develop sufficient independent verifiable reliable sources on it, then it can be separated into its own article. As it is, it ''does'' provide bias: it gives |undue weight to this subject. It is not ''currently'' notable, so it does not ''currently'' warrant a stand-alone page
— User:Magidin, 16:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:WEIGHT (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)