Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dates in Harry Potter (second nomination)
The main argument to delete the article was that it constitutes an |original synthesis. However, this article does ''not'' advance a position, as required by . As for the idea that the article synthesises disparate facts in an original manner, I shudder to think that the simple act of ordering dates chronologically or adding or subtracting numbers, which is explicitly allowed in , could be considered "original research
— User:Black, 17:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNT||WP:SYNT||WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)