Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analytic/Anglophone and Continental Philosophy
as |original research.  Though there are some supporting citations for a few of its claims, the bulk of this article is idiosyncratic, original interpretation and synthesis, stated as though it were incontrovertible factual information, in Wikipedia's voice – exactly what the original research guideline is meant to guard against.  There are serious NPOV issues with some of these claims as well, but this is a secondary concern.  I agree that it would be possible to write a neutral, well-sourced, synthetic encyclopedia article on the analytic-continental split, but this is not that article
— User:Rbellin, 22:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)