Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credit Management
The great notability of this topic may be seen from the http://books.google.com/books?&as_brr=0&as_epq=Credit+Management thousands of books, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22credit+management%22&hl=en&lr=&start=10&sa=N scholarly papers and http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&q=%22Credit+Management%22+encyclopedia+&btnG=Search+Books encyclopedic articles which cover it, many of them being devoted entirely to the topic and given the title ''Credit Management'' like our article.  The article just needs improvement in accordance with our |editing policy and deletion is not helpful in this.  I have made a modest start but the article already has better sources than some of the suggested alternatives such as Accounts Receivable.  The editors above who complain of original research provide no particulars or evidence but it seems that they misunderstand the point.  Our articles are required to be original writing as they might otherwise be in breach of our policies on |copyright or |plagiarism.  What we must avoid are original theories or discoveries but this issue is not relevant to this article which describes a common business activity
— User:Colonel, 12:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IMPERFECT||WP:COPYRIGHT||WP:PLAGIARISM (Wikipedia:Editing policy)