Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invento Robotics
I de-tagged it for A7 as there was a (somewhat) credible claim of significance, making it ineligible for A7 in my view. I'd kept an eye on the article to see what became of it following this, fully intending to send it through AfD if it did not improve. The de-tagging however, does not mean that (a) it is notable, or (b) it is not promotional. In relation to notability - the coverage in reliable sources is incredibly difficult to identify as most seems to be regurgitated PR junk, even in seemingly OK publications. I am on the fence as to whether it meets the notability guidelines |for articles or |corporations as I am struggling to find coverage which seems truly reliable. In terms of promotion; the article (even in its' significantly pared back state) is irrecoverably promotional. To the point where the only way forward appears to be to |blow it up and start over. |Wikipedia is not for advertising
— User:Jack, 06:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:TNT||WP:NOTPROMO (Wikipedia:Notability)