Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2013
That a dysfunctional tilt in wiki articles like this exists is the main problem. I see nothing wrong with such lists, save for the fact that (a) it is relatively easy to main-source attacks on Israel -they get intense coverage abroad, but quite difficult to find RS for attacks where Palestinians or their infrastructure are casualties (). We are deleting en masse the Palestinian articles, but none of the Israeli articles will lose out in the Adf process. (b) the Israel/victim pages show the vice of using 'Palestinians' instead of 'Palestinian militant'. (Imagine the obverse, if one wrote 'Israelis' bombed a Palestinian refugee camp' etc. It's the IDF that does that, a group or institution. That usage is a clear violation of , involving ethnic stereotyping and collective blame. (This article also adds shameful colour by mentioning Shavuot festivities being disturbed by 'Palestinians' etc). The answer is to have articles representing the comparable lists for both sides 'Israeli/Palestinian attacks' per year, astringently neutral. Otherwise articles on this from neither side should be permitted, since they are  being abused by image-manipulation, and this one looks like anything you can  get out of an Israeli government website
— User:Nishidani, 10:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:systemic bias (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)