Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucharest maternity hospital explosion
per , which provides that "a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notable", and that "further analysis or discussion" are needed to establish notability. Of course, it's too early for those; should they happen, we can recreate at a later date. In response to Circeus' request: sure, every one of the leading Romanian newspapers has covered this since it happened; here's one article from each of them: http://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/explozie-la-maternitatea-giulesti-patru-bebelusi-morti-si-sapte-raniti-in-stare-grava-9033.html, http://www.gandul.info/news/explozie-la-maternitatea-giulesti-patru-bebelusi-morti-si-alti-sapte-in-stare-grava-parintii-nu-stiu-care-dintre-raniti-este-copilul-lor-vezi-aici-filmul-tragediei-6912930, http://www.adevarul.ro/actualitate/patrulea-decedat-incendiului-Maternitatea-Giulesti_0_318568158.html, http://www.cotidianul.ro/122338-Numarul_bebelusilor_morti_la_maternitatea_Giulesti_a_ajuns_la_patru, http://www.jurnalul.ro/stire-observator/tragedie-fara-seaman-la-maternitatea-giulesti-552146.html, http://www.romanialibera.ro/actualitate/eveniment/incendiu-la-maternitatea-giulesti-4-bebelusi-au-murit-7-sunt-raniti-grav-196648.html. That's to be expected: the press reports the news. That doesn't automatically make the news encyclopedically notable, and I believe that has not yet been shown to be the case here
— User:Biruitorul, 16:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PERSISTENCE (Wikipedia:Notability)