Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Docket (court)
There's a fundamental misunderstanding here of the process:  An Afd for |notablity is argues that the topic ''in itself'' should not have a Wikipedia article because no good Wikipedia article  ''could ever'' be written about the topic.  I and others argue that the topic  has encyclopedic significance given its wide usage in the United States and numerous appearances in reliable sources.  That, I would think is self-evident, hence, it is a notable topic.  The current state of the article is that it {{tl|needs citations}}.  That is a reason to add templates and improve the article, preferably by a subject matter expert to provide cites for the summary which now exist in the article. The article needs improvement not deletion.  Impatience with the pace at which the article improves is never a good reason to delete.  |The Wikipedia is a work in progress
— User:Patsw, 13:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:WIP (Wikipedia:Notability)