Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpretive science
looks to me to be a classic case of - the "definitions" section with all those quotes selectively mined and lined up to produce the argument is a telltale sign. Many of the sources seem unrelated to the subject and serve only to introduce what looks to be a Creationist POV. Combine that with the total failure of the article to explain Wikipedia:Complete Bollocks#The art thereof|just what "interpretive science" actually ''is'' and how it ''works'', and it becomes clear that this is not a real article at all and probably can never be one
— User:Reyk, 00:46, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)