Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Walpin (2nd nomination)
as the person who first nominated this article for the exact same reason that Rd232 has above, I find that the article, in the state it is in today, does not give  coverage to the firing, and it appears that notability has been established via other references.  I appreciate not wanting to reward banned editors, (both of the editors involved in creating and expanding this article have been banned, those being Grundle and ChildofMidnight), however, in this case, I do not find that fact to be a compelling reason to delete this article in light of the state it is in today, which is pretty unobjectionable if you knew nothing of the history of the article.  You would not count me among the friends of either of these banned editors, and they have well earned their ban, but I don't think that cutting off our own nose to spite our face is productive, and that's all this deletion would do
— User:Jayron32, 01:46, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)