Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Davies (3rd nomination)
conditional on updating the current article to reflect the new sources listed by SquatGoblin. Disclosure: I posted the current version. It was speedy deleted, and on review I was inclined to agree the sourcing was marginal and largeley circular. Given the coverage by several non-trivial sources in the interim, the article now appears to pass  and  if properly amended. The article should not (and does not) state conclusively whether this is a hoax (an unverifiable claim), but shoud discuss the (verifiable) controversy and provide the appropriate references. Without those additional, external sources, the article is susceptible to the criticisms in other votes above regarding sources
— User:Gerta, 15:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)