Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educology
per SportingFlyer's !vote just above and the  concerns raised by the nominator. Moreover, the article reads like a copyvio, thanks to short phrases being lifted from primary sources ("phenomena within the educational process", "the fund of knowledge", "intentionally studies under guidance some content in some physical, social and cultural setting", etc. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0798C78ZF/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_taft_p1_i4https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494894.pdf), and the fact that what was not lifted lacks all distinguishing features. The text around the plagiarized phrases is like an interminable and opaque PowerPoint presentation with too many words on each slide
— User:XOR, 15:14, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)