Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opposition to Maryland Route 200
The actual content of the two subsidiary articles is not that large;  has simply made far more material available to the online researcher on a controversial road with a complex history, and in each case most of the content of each article is in references which are pretty much duplicate two and three times over. There's no real need to split these out especially since the historical/controversial matter is really what is of most interest; the niggling detail needs to be cut back
— User:Mangoe, 16:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RECENTISM (Wikipedia:Recentism)