Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama on Twitter
Under NPOV, all facts on a given subject should be treated in one article except in the case of an Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts: "Summary style" articles|article spinout, and article splits must not be an attempt to evade the consensus process at another article. See . Also see : "Splitting long articles and leaving adequate summaries is a natural part of growth for a topic." The biographical article Barack Obama on Twitter is not a written account of Barack Obama's life. Moreover the keeps have failed to establish that Barack Obama on Twitter is a significant part of a written account of Barack Obama's life. In fact, Twitter is such an insignificant event in the life of Barack Obama that a search of the Barack Obama article for "twitter" reveals that twitter is not even mentioned in the Barack Obama biography. That raises  issues, which notes that not every match played, goal scored or hand shaken is notable enough to be included in the biography of a person. The keeps have not established consensus to condense Barack Obama on Twitter to a brief summary in the Barack Obama main article as required before creating an article spinout. The keeps have not established that Barack Obama on Twitter is part of treating biographical facts on Barack Obama in one biographical article. Rather, the creation of Barack Obama on Twitter bypassed the NPOV required article spinout consensus process. The keeps have not established that Barack Obama on Twitter is a natural part of growth for the Barack Obama main article as required by . Barack Obama on Twitter should be deleted per NPOV and NOT
— User:Uzma, 11:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOVFACT||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:NOTDIARY||WP:NOTPAPER (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)