Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical homeopathy
in its current form the article does not warrant a separate page. If one is able to really discuss ''classical homeopathy'' (which does exist) with sufficient  and without violating ,  I have no problem with such an article. Clearly that is not the case today
— User:Nescio, 13:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)