Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pghbridges.com
now that quotes from verifiable third-party sources have been added.  Just because the site isn't notable per  doesn't mean it can't be encyclopedic for other reasons.  The article is a mess right now, but once this nomination is closed and no-one's trying to prove a point anymore we can rewrite it into a perfectly good (if short) article about a perfectly good (if mildly obscure) reference source.  And besides, this is clearly not linkspam.  Exactly what would deleting this accomplish — :meta:Wiki is not paper|saving paper
— User:Ilmari, 21:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)