Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bagpipe books
The |notability guideline for lists says that the items in the list should have been "discussed ''as a group or set'' by independent reliable sources".  This list does not cite any sources that discuss these books as a group or set. Indeed, the talk page contains a discussion about if the article needs a reference section or not, which concludes with, "I . . . don't understand why there's a "references" section when the whole article is a list of books."  They seem to have decided that the books serve as their own references, which so far as the title, author, publication info, and the fact that they are about bagpipes is concerned is true, but there is no evidence that NLIST is satisfied - that anyone before Wikipedia has treated these books as a set
— User:ONUnicorn, 20:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NLIST (Wikipedia:Notability)