Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Mackie
Even if a person does nominally meet a notability criterion in NCURLING, their includability is still conditional on the article's |sourceability — and the article still has to be written neutrally and non-promotionally. (For just the most blatant example of the many problems here, "There is life after the CBC" is not an appropriate section subhead.) So even if NCURLING doesn't change, leaving him still technically clearing the guideline as it stands, the article would ''still'' have to be |blown up and restarted from scratch with better sourcing, and if it does indeed change, his notability claim won't clear it anymore — and, for that matter, notability for his radio career isn't properly established by reliable sources either. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can ''properly'' source him over , but ''this'' version just can't stand. ''Regardless'' of whether he has a valid notability ''claim'' or not, it's the claim's ''sourceability'' that determines his includability or lack thereof, not the mere ''existence'' of an ''unsourced'' claim of notability
— User:Bearcat, 16:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:TNT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)