Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Green Bay Packers retired numbers
See , , and  for policies and guidelines regarding standalone lists. The basic guidelines include: a defined membership, notable people make up the list, and the list is discussed in reliable sources. The main reasons listed to delete are that the list is not long enough and that it can be included in the larger article. From what I can see, neither of these are established in Wikipedia policies or guidelines. The list is clearly defined (if the Packers have formally retired a number), made up of notable people (all professional football players with extensive careers and accolades), and is discussed in reliable sources as a cohesive list (see http://archive.jsonline.com/packerinsider/99326524.html Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, https://www.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/dougherty/2016/06/22/packers-should-retire-hornungs-no-5/86237952/ USA Today, http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/14232466/brett-favre-retired-number-unveiled-green-bay-packers ESPN just to name a few). This list needs to be expanded and improved, but that is never a reason to delete an article. This list should expand on various things that wouldn't be included in the Green Bay Packers article, including backgrounds on each player, why the organization decided to retire their number, discussion about unofficial retired numbers, and the addition of future retired numbers. The Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame is a completely different topic and would not be appropriate for the list of retired numbers. It appears that none of the delete votes are rooted in any policies or guidelines, and just comes down to the article not being good enough at this time. Note to the closing admin that deletion discussions should be based on |adherence to policy before determining consensus
— User:Gonzo_fan2007, 17:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SALAT||WP:LISTCRITERIA||WP:LISTPEOPLE||WP:NHC (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)