Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software Craftsmanship
I see a page with sources relating to the article title, though not necessarily its content. The defense seems to be argument by fiat or by anecdote, with most of the defenders admitting to . That's specifically a problem in discussions like this. The problem is that without third party verification, this is a vanity page. - Special:Contributions/68.20.1.120|68.20.1.120
— [[User talk:68.20.1.120|talk]]), 07:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)