Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Murray (politician) (3rd nomination)
The sources provide sufficient information to write a reasonable biography, and we follow the sources. If there was this much coverage about a milkman delivering milk, he would be notable based upon sourcing alone. The bias against losing politicians is turning WP into an incumbent's paradise. Per , if we have the sources, we should have the article. Anything else is an attempt to insert a value judgment into the inclusion criteria which is outside of policy and principle, or an attempt to bury significant coverage of an individual as "routine" because we have regularly scheduled elections in a democracy. Are we to have another AfD every 90 days until those who seek deletion get the result they want
— User:JimMillerJr, 15:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)