Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry white male
If the nominator actually read the article I am not sure how they could have come to the conclusion that the article "doesn't exactly explain what it is", when the first sentance reads Angry White Male '''"is the designation of a voting bloc of white males"'''. And then goes on to describe the characteristics of the said voting bloc. While the current source is not properly noted using inline citations, all the information is laid out Angry white male#References|in one of the better bibliographic notes that I have seen, showing that it is |notalbe and |verifiable. It is currently in need of cleanup, but it doesn not meet deletion criteria
— [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|The Red Pen of Doom]], 00:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)