Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetWiki (2nd nomination)
it may be "something", but is it something ''notable''?  Is there non-trivial independent coverage by reliable sources?  Or is this just something that deserves ''at most'' a minor footnote in the articles about MediaWiki and Wikinfo?  Frankly, I think this is starting to run afoul of .  Although I suppose it might be marginally better than Elephant (wikipedia article) (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elephant (wikipedia article)|AfD).  (Or not.  The Elephant article was better written and better researched than this one, IMO
— User:Xtifr, 03:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ASR (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)