Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative Halakha
This should not be in an RfD. There isn't even a claim that the material doesn't meet the usual criteria of , , . The reason given for deletion -- that Conservative Jews do not have an approach to Halakha distinct from Orthodoxy  -- represents a NPOV|POV and is simply not a valid AfD criterion since it simply doesn't address the question of whether the content is encyclopedic (many |reliable sources think the two don't approach things identically, but that's a separate issue.) The only question is where this content should be -- as a stand-alone or as part of another article, such as Conservative Judaism, Conservative responsa, Committee on Jewish Law and Standards, or Halakha. This question should be addressed in an AfM discussion, not an AfD. Finally, the Conservative movement made a very controversial decision last week about the issue of homosexuality. This article is the only place in Wikipedia that contains a detailed discussion of that decision. The AfD process should not be used to eliminate valid information about controversial (and notable) topics. Deletion is completely inappropriate. '''Speedy Keep
— User:Shirahadasha, 22:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)