Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvikkalkul (2nd nomination)
This is an early esoteric language. It is documented in reliable sources like http://foldoc.org/Kvikkalkul FOLDOC and http://www.catb.org/retro/ The Retrocomputing Museum. Based on a Usenet post in 1994, it has become a minor part of computing folklore, like Intercal. These RS are enough to establish verifiability and some notability, but I am not sure there is enough depth to declare notability according to . The stub itself needs refs, but the prose is fine and seems accurate relative to my knowledge. I am on the fence in terms of a recommendation. If there was a good place to selectively merge, maybe Esoteric programming language#Examples, I think that would be the best option
— User:Mark, 19:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)