Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Marxism (2nd nomination)
and perform the inevitable fate this article will face'' once the |canvassing and off-site collaboration from s has settled down. Many commenters here and editors of the article are misunderstanding the process of fitting into  and more specifically /. As for the article itself, many sources listed here fall under the eyes of  beneath . Merely because a term exists a few times in articles from B-tier sources does not imply any means of verifying some kind of notability. Merely because it is in the title (but not contents of) of essays or academic papers (see  and  for |fringe material) does not imply notability and have no place here, similar to the old climate change wars and other controversial topics. Hell, ''a graph from Google Trends Australia'' has been in the article near the top since 8 Decemberhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cultural_Marxism&diff=637141488&oldid=637139933 as an incredibly desperate attempt to provide . Worse, it was added under a stealth edit summary to hide its inclusion. It's so well-guarded and generally low-priority in trying to clear up that the essay-style wording of its entire paragraph has been left there to rot
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CANVASS||WP:SPA||WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE||WP:ONUS||WP:V||WP:SPS||WP:REDFLAG||WP:FRINGE||WP:N (Wikipedia:Canvassing)