Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DokuWiki
I returned to the discussion because there was a possible good faith minor  attempt to persuade some comments to change to keep !votes.  A good closer would account for that anywaay; and it would be hard at this moment to establsih any concensus to delete.  I have always not wanted to get heavily involved in this as this was pretty well certainly always going to be a stonewall keep, and I dont want to get into hunting specific sources if I have to, I'm time limited.  I do note of significance {{u|gegohouse}} presented significant and sufficient sources for RS consideration on 9:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC).  Failure to challenge those within what is now nearly is surely a minimum for a keep no-consensus, and probably sufficient for a keep result.  Thankyou
— User:Djm, 21:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CANVAS (Wikipedia:Canvassing)