Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas D. Taylor
To report on the subject neutrally, we need to include the negative material (the retraction and the predatory journal editing), since those are very salient for an academic. But such negative material in a BLP requires a higher standard of sourcing and notability that doesn't seem to be present here. One can make a case that his citation counts are good enough for #C1, but they're not backed up by good secondary sourcing about the subject, and his use of predatory journals calls the validity of his citation counts into question. The better solution is just to delete the article
— User:David, 16:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)