Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Robertson ''GQ'' interview controversy
To be quite honest, I'm not surprised to see sportfan5000 here. I'm glad this discussion has steered clear of any attempt to derail the negators as having a bone to push against equality rights. However, when the discussion at Talk:Duck Dynasty seemed to tread towards condensing the recent event, which still occupies more space in the article than info on the show itself, this article was spun out in an attempt to retain the info. I personally feel this is a BLP violation, as it goes a long way to condemning Phil for his opinions. This also falls under  and , as the coverage of this rather trivial event on here is overblown. Finally,  lightly applies, as evidenced by the title alone. In this article, I see no evidence of viewpoints that support Phil's comments, however intolerant they may be to some
— User:Floydian, 04:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:Recentism)