Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack P. Gunter
If the only independent source is one angry customer with a nose job complication, then the page should be deleted in order to comply with . Actually, I think unless nosejobsgonebad is balanced with other sources, it shouldn't even be included. If enough reliable third-party sources exist to support an article, then there would be something worth keeping. At this stage, the problem is a lack of good sources. If Rosemont Media can come up with enough good sources for an article, then that's great. If all they are going to do is put up a resume, then they've come to the wrong place and the article can just be deleted. I've added a few good sources below. Anyone else is welcome to add more.&nbsp;&nbsp
— User:Chris_Capoccia, 18:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATTACK (Wikipedia:Attack page)