Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TiMidity++ (2nd nomination)
Can't go just by chapter headings—what does the text say? ''Linux Sound Programming'' is more of a how-to manual, and the "chapters" ({{doi|10.1007/978-1-4842-2496-0_21}}; {{doi|10.1007/978-1-4842-2496-0_28}}) are just code examples with zero background on the software itself or its importance. I'm struggling to see what can be cited from it at all. Mentions in scientific papers are not |significant coverage. Mentions in the |user-generated Arch wiki (or any other unWikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources|reliable source) do not indicate external notability. Not seeing any useful redirect targets either. Altogether, lacks |significant coverage in multiple |reliable, |independent sources. (|?) (not Help:Watchlist|watching, please {{tl|ping
— [[User talk:Czar|czar]], 19:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:USERG||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42 (Wikipedia:Notability)