Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appian Corporation
This was a somewhat marginal case (hence the talk post). I believe notability is best demonstrated by these three summaries: https://www.wired.com/2001/11/army-intranet-worlds-largest/ Wired talking about Army Portal; https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/06/22/feature/forget-silicon-valley-the-dulles-tech-corridor-is-cultivating-companies-that-break-the-mold WashingtonPost on alternative to Silicon Valley, using Appian as an example; https://www.pcmag.com/article/344371/build-an-app-in-15-minutes-with-zero-coding-using-appian-qui PCMag on what they do (Little less trustworthy via some Appian involvement). Two of these sources are product-based articles but they cover the parent company in good detail, so I don't believe inherited applies. The sources were narrowed to satisfy NCORP. Regarding the use of  I'd first say that it doesn't apply, since it's designed to apply to things where there are countless equivalents - more importantly it is an essay on notability and  is more relevant, where other companies existing or not existing is irrelevant to Appian being notable
— User:Nosebagbear, 11:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MILL||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill)