Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtonomics (2nd nomination)
Fails  and . Most of the Russian sources mentioned above (and in the previous AfD) were in the article, but I removed them as unreliable, mostly press releases, that didn't even support the claims made. The sites haven't been vetted by |WPVG–which isn't unusual, especially for non-English sources–but ''if'' they were brought to G/RS I can guarantee that they would be judged as ''unreliable''. We're talking blogs without mastheads or any indication of editorial control, most without even ''author by-lines'', but prominent "advertise here" links. I couldn't say that the articles were advertisements, of course, but they're just like what we see on advert-ridden pay-to-review browser game sites. There is zero indication that this game has been featured or reviewed by any sort of legitimate gaming press
— User:Woodroar, 01:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:WPVG||WP:VG (Wikipedia:Notability)