Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic totalitarianism (4th nomination)
fails #Undue weight per sheer dearth of currency inside or outside the academic community. Zero hits in ScienceDirect (including numerous economics handbooks) and a total 7 of JSTOR article hits over sixty years, all completely unrelated to each other, and none in economics journals, none citing Friedman, show this term never gained a foothold in the academic debate. 120 total (65 unique) Google book hits is far too small to give a term encyclopedic billing. Economic engine gets http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=%22economic+engine%22&as_brr=0 2770 hits, economic prowess: http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=%22economic+prowess%22&as_brr=0 1010 hits, economic wisdom: http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=%22economic+wisdom%22&as_brr=0 2160 hits, economic literacy: http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=%22economic+literacy%22&as_brr=0 1220 hits, economic necessity: http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=%22economic+necessity%22&as_brr=0 26,200 hits, economic decline: http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=%22economic+decline%22&as_brr=0 34,800 hits. Even economic symbolism, a completely meaningless term, gets http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=%22economic+symbolism%22&as_brr=0 71 hits. I could go on and on. Just string two words together, "economic" and "something", and you're bound to get a couple http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=%22economic+something%22&as_brr=0 hits
— User:Trialsanderrors, 18:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)