Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.S.F.Patil
and '''Comment'''. Delete because of issues detailed above. I have nothing new to add to the lack of notability. As one of the people who does copyedit work, and am fairly new to it on here, I always wonder why such badly formed articles are allowed to begin with. Even if it was notable, I would want (though perhaps it is incorrect to want this on Wikipedia) for it to be draftified until the original author could get under some control. Doesn't have to be perfect of course but this isn't even an article, it's a list of things this person supposedly did. Someone else would need to come by and change it to prose and deal with all the  issues. That doesn't seem quite fair when the original writer didn't even make an attempt
— User:PopularOutcast, 21:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)