Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KaTeX
I think the ICMS and SD Times sources that I added to the article after the nomination are sufficiently reliable, in-depth, and independent to pass . (The new TUGboat source is also reliable and independent but not very in-depth.) Also, nominator, did you place a notice of this discussion on the talk pages of your proposed merge targets? I believe this should be a required part of the process whenever a merge is suggested at an AfD, by the nominator or anyone else. To do otherwise risks having an impasse where the consensus at the AfD is to merge but the local consensus at the merge target is to keep the material out
— User:David, 19:45, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)