Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Thomas Beauchamp controversy
I'd never heard of this event before, but one look at the article shows it easily passes Wikipedia's requirements of |reliable sources and |notability. Just because the facts of the case are ''disputed'' does not mean the case is not ''notable'' - whether the reports were a hoax or not, the story about them has become sufficiently well-known to deserve an article on Wikipedia. It looks like almost everyone else here agrees, and if no one makes a decent argument for deletion within the next few hours I think this AfD should be |closed early as an obvious Keep
— User:Terraxos, 02:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)