Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Fairly OddParents characters (2nd nomination)
based on this taking too much room up in the main article.  Also, I understand the  and sourcing arguments, but those seem to be more relevant when we don't have many "informed" eyeballs focused on verifying content.  This isn't obscure chemical variations of plant enzymes - it's a show that every fan will be able to quickly spot errors and fix them, with or without proper sourcing. (Heck - I'd just source with the episode name, whether it can be viewed online or not). That's the beauty of crowdsourcing. I know this position isn't supported by any formal policy and the purists will be angry, but if it works and brings enjoyment to some readers, why not just let it go
— User:timtempleton, 19:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)