Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Wang (cadet)
Subject fulfills  easily, which is enough for Wikipedia. Moreover, subject also satisfies  easily since that policy establishes that a person is likely to be notable if he "has received a well-known and significant award or honor." Wang satisfies those conditions since he has received two significant honors: (1) the ROTC Medal for Heroism, the highest medal awarded by the Army ROTC, and (2) a posthumous admittance to West Point, which according to ''The Washington Post'' and many other sources, is "very rare." Furthermore, Wang also satisfies  because "media coverage of both the event and the individual's role" has "grown larger." Even more so, the event is "highly significant and the individual's role within it is a large one" since Wang can be easily singled out in contrast to others involved in the event. In addition, he also satisfies  since, as a victim, Wang had "a large role within a well-documented historic event." His "role" is considered "large" because his actions have obtained significant exclusive coverage and because within the context of the event itself Wang's actions had a significant impact (by saving several lives). The event is also a "well-documented historic event" because https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/15/us/florida-shooting.html according to ''The New York Times'' it was "one of the deadliest the shooting in modern American history." Finally, contributors are reminded that  is an essay and thus not policy, that  is a failed proposal and thus not policy, and that  is for biographies of ''living'' people which does not apply to Wang because he is dead. &mdash
— User:Ahnoneemoos, 03:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:BIO1E||WP:VICTIM||WP:TOOSOON||WP:SOLDIER||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)