Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison between Roman and Han Empires (2nd nomination)
Comparing two things an author wants to compare is not an encyclopedic topic.  What about Comparison between Roman Empire and modern Uruguay?  More to the point, this article seems to be in large part an attempt to make the Roman Empire look bad.  Consider that contains sentences like this: "Nothing underlines the backwardness of the west more than the fact for thousands of years millions of human beings plowed the earth in a manner which was so wasteful of effort, and so utterly exhausting, that this deficiency of sensible plowing may rank as mankind's greatest waste of time and energy. Only the Chinese freed themselves from the tyranny of bad plows."  This is not only a violation of , it's a bad article.  If someone wants to present a scholars theory of these differences, it should be under the scholar's article, or under "So-and-So's Theory of the difference between
— User:Glenfarclas, 21:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)