Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish subversion
Nowhere does it say you ''cannot'' use  as a reason for deletion. The section you cite ends with: "Material that violates  should be removed." There are serious questions of |verifiability here. If that is not established, then  applies. The sources cited merely add supposed references to what appears to be original research. In order to save this article, we would need to gut it and start again. Is there any point to that? Others have suggested a merge and that is a sound compromise, and that is exactly what we are here for, reaching consensus. Please do not jump the gun on whether or not the article is "here to stay". The necessary gutting of this apparent bit of original research would likely lead to an edit war: not a reason in itself to delete, but more than enough reason to be cautious and consider at the very least a merge.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Freshacconci, 17:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)