Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Martin (academic)
No secondary sources, no independent, notable sources regarding his research. As a matter of fact, I don't see ''any'' published research. Kind of makes  a hard sell. Yes, he is currently a dean at a major university. Great. But, I would have voted for keep if he acquired that position while publishing, distinguishing himself (e.g. fellowship) in some way
— User:Jimsteele9999, 18:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)