Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercer University School of Medicine
Merely clicking on the http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mercer+University+School+of+Medicine%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#q=%22Mercer+University+School+of+Medicine%22&hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&ei=rrqmT661IuHL2QWkx5CmAg&start=20&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=ae8dac67cd049857&biw=1280&bih=856 news link in the above AfD Find sources heading shows that there is more than enough coverage in reliable sources that are independent of Mercer University School of Medicine to maintain a stand along article on Mercer University School of Medicine. Clearly meets . As for the argument that the topic does not have enough fame, importance, or popularity notability for a Wikipedia article, that argument doesn't jive with all these reliable sources using their time and resources to write about Mercer University School of Medicine. The article is far from need for a |Blow it up and start over solution. While the article could be improved (e.g., info on accreditation problems,http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AT&p_theme=at&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB7C2149499BFD2&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM etc.) need for improvement isn't a basis for deletion and there's no reason to merge a topic that can stand on its own per . I added {{tl|Main|Mercer University School of Medicine}} to the Mercer University article,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mercer_University&diff=prev&oldid=491032202 which I think takes care of this issue. See Wikipedia:Summary style#Basic technique
— User:Uzma, 18:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:TNT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)