Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XOYO
It has a https://www.residentadvisor.net/news/71241 good https://www.residentadvisor.net/news/17361 amount of https://www.residentadvisor.net/news/27276 coverage at ''Resident Advisor'', which I'd describe as the paper of record for electronic music. (From what I can see, all these articles are written by staff and have bylines.) The claim about being voted one of the top 100 clubs by ''DJ Mag'' https://djmag.com/top-100-clubs/poll-clubs-2020-xoyo checks out. It was https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/clubbing/xoyo-london-tickets-dress-code-monday-capacity-a3971751.html profiled by the ''Evening Standard'' and then https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/clubbing/xoyo-london-new-main-room-hunee-residency-a3952206.html further described. (Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources|No consensus on the reliability of the ''Standard'', but this is basic factual reporting about a local club in London—don't think there's a whole lot of reliability to question there.) But a fair amount of this coverage, while it exists, could be seen as —hence why my keep is still weak
— User:AleatoryPonderings, 14:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)