Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo hoax in popular culture (2nd nomination)
per Steve Dufour, Escape Orbit and JH Hall.  To back up Escape, I can't see what "POV fork, trivia page, clearly unencyclopedic, clearly POV and WP:FRINGE article name" means.  How can the pop-culture view be a content fork?  Notable examples can be kept, and trivia can be removed.  Pop-culture is inherently Wikipedic, because we can go beyond print encyclopedias.  Unencyclopedic really means (a) |the nominator just doesn't like it, (b) the nominator can't grasp the concept of an Internet encyclopedia and its potential, or (c) it's better suited for a fan page or being transwikied to Wikitionary; I don't see how the latter applies.  A move or re-name can work for a badly-named article; WP:AfD is not the place to discuss that. 10-lb-hammer, your concerns can be addressed through normal editing processes
— User:Bearian, 19:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)