Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tacha
Nom is correct in that there is not enough in-depth, independent coverage to establish the subject's notability per ; many of the sources are puff pieces or churnalism. In addition, the COI/PAID issues and off-wiki canvasing surrounding this subject (see Talk:Tacha#Paid Advocacy Off Wikipedia & Major Canvassing) definitely runs afoul of  and , core policies of Wikipedia. While these may be overlooked if the subject were overwhelmingly considered to be notable, the past AfD - which resulted in deletion - shows this is not the case
— User:SamHolt6, 23:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:NOTADVOCACY (Wikipedia:Notability)