Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlsbad grimple
As somewhat of a newbie, I judge articles based not on what I think at all, and only according to (rather strict reading of) WP guidelines. Let me also preface the rest of this by saying I am far from a prude, and widely circulated many of the above listed phrases amongst friends back in the day, and in an attempt to see what human are capable of I have a library of some rather gross and disgusting images and videos which frankly don't disgust me anymore. So, coming upon this article I did first what I usually do: read the appropriate guidelines, in this case . To judge a neologism on whether you've heard of it seems to suggest you haven't read  lately. What are these guidleines for if arguments are made which ignore them? In spite on what I've read on the other sexual neologism debates, I think they, too, still fail  miserably, and suggest another debate on the merits of them at all
— User:Guyanakoolaid, 22:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:NEO||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)