Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free alternatives to proprietary software
I don't see how the nom could possibly consider this to be OR. Each entry is clearly either Proprietary software or Free software. Each entry is clearly a specific type of software. There is nothing at all wrong with grouping these in a table by software type and license. The only way something like this could become OR is if it were stated that one particular type of software was better than the other. states: ''"The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough to be a '''separate article''' in Wikipedia. They do not give guidance on the '''content''' of articles, except for lists of people. Instead, various :Category:Wikipedia content policy|content policies govern article content, with the amount of coverage given to topics '''within''' articles decided by its appropriate |weight."''While the notability guideline may apply to the individual entries listed in these tables for the purposes of determining if each should have it's own standalone article, it does not in any way limit how these articles may be linked and listed elsewhere.From where I sit, this article appears to me to be a typical :Category:Indexes of articles|article index with the benefits of listing both proprietary and free software side by side
— User:Tothwolf, 11:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NNC||WP:WEIGHT (Wikipedia:Notability)