Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Beardsley
that the article is reliably and verifiably sourced.  I just added a little info, some more sources, but, overall, that IP has a point: this is a article readers expect to find on Wikipedia. IMO, that makes it the sort of article we should keep.   And searches show that her work is widely cited in books and (non-NPR) articles, meeting  #1.) :  "is widely cited by peers
— User:E, 12:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:JOURNALIST (Wikipedia:Notability)