Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyscraperCity (4th nomination)
I was for deleting above, and I can't see where it clearly and obviously passes GNG, but there are so many pointers and minor mentions and other factors that make me think this is bordering on a  KEEP.  I think I've done that twice in 50,000 edits, so it isn't something I use often.  It boils down to "is Wikipedia better off with or without the article?" and I think we are better off with since it is so well known, I just can't find enough sources to pass the normal criteria, and it clearly doesn't.  Keep in mind, criteria isn't a hard pass/fail line, it is a fuzzy line, a really good general purpose guideline that works 99.99% of the time.  This isn't a spam article, or some wannabe superbusinessman's biography, it is an article on a website that is references an insane number of times by other high quality websites, meaning this might qualify to be that .01%.  This is exactly the circumstance that  exists for: exceedingly rare situations where we are better off ignoring the rules.  It is just a matter of whether others agree we are better off with it or not
— User:Dennis, 18:44, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)