Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Universal Century technology
PLEASE '''define''' ''why magazine sources are primary''. If you cannot do so, your arguments are faulty at best and does not show any willingness to discuss and fall into the category of ,  and  since you don't read the discussion before you ''vote'' and per , this is NOT a vote but a discussion. Magazines and their special editions like appendices from third party publications and editorials ARE secondary sources, and reliable per .  All of the arguments here are simply western biased or I should say biased because of users do not know the magazines published in Japan.(And a fact is that at least one of the magazine sources listed a magazine that is publishing in North America
— User:Mythsearcher, 07:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NN||WP:CRUFTCRUFT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOT||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)