Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dingonek
Looking at the article as it stands now, there is one  source. There appears to be no   sources. There appears to be no  outside of the crypto-zoology field. Therefore, in my opinion it does not meet ability. I also reject the Slippery slope fallacy being employed on this page - if the Dingonek is removed today then tomorrow it could be the removal of the Loch Ness monster
— User:William, 08:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:RELIABLE||WP:SECONDARY||WP:NRV||WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:No original research)