Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KnowledgeTree (2nd nomination)
I added better content with a couple of more sources, including a couple of CEO interviews, and removed anything that could be considered advertising.  The article has gone from being nominated for deletion due to being advertorial and weakly sourced with three items to better with nine, and less advertorial.  I read  and don't think any of these sources are routine, brief, passing or simple references.  Please clarify your interpretation(s) so I know what you are referring to.  The whole article now comes from this independent media coverage
— User:Timtempleton, 22:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)