Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudoarchaeology
Sources indicate this is a notable topic: books like Feder's and the listed articles establish notability. The title is a well-known term. If the nominator's main concern is with the article name, there are procedures for discussing that. And  makes it clear that articles on fringe ideas should concentrate on accurately reporting the opinion of mainstream experts, e.g. if all the mainstream sources say it's nonsense, it's ok for the article to say so. Despite what the proposer thinks, there is no requirement for an article to be largely favorable towards its subject
— User:Colapeninsula, 09:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)