Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starbucks collectibles
if I could find the slightest indication that this term was notable, I'd have argued for a merge, but I cannot. A google search turns up precisely nothing, and all of the sources in the article seem to be aimed at proving that people do in fact collect Starbucks merch and that a secondary market exists (hardly surprising - people will collect anything) but do nothing to show that the term, concept, or existence of that secondary market is notable. So, agree with nom that this fails , insufficient sourced content for a merge. A case could be made for a redirect, but the obvious redirect target of Starbucks#Starbucks_collectibles was itself only added today, and seemingly only in a rather misguided effort to de-orphan ''this'' article. Since that section is itself extremely poorly sourced (an unreliable website, and an article that is actually about the Starbucks card and not the concept of collectibles as a whole) it should be removed. Hence, I see no value in a redirect either
— User:Hugsyrup, 11:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)