Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jehovah's Witnesses teaching programs
based on lack of reliable secondary sources to establish . Alternately, I could see including the significant independent reliably sourced information to Sunday school or similar, possibly even leaving a redirect behind. I note that many of the "keep" comments above seem to my eyes to not address matters of policies or guidelines, and believe that might be taken into account at closing. I also note that, in general, I probably ''would'' agree that several similar entities of other major Christian groups might very easily be notable. This would be I think in large part because those groups, like the Anglicans, Lutherans, Calvinists, Catholics, etc., do not share the JW's apparent aversion to independent media coverage, and are much more frequently and thoroughly discussed in independent reliable sources, and even often in the local or regional publications of those faiths, which often have a degree of independence from the church itself. Unfortunately, this group's mild aversion to independent reliable sources is a problem for many subjects regarding the Jehovah's Witnesses in particular. Having myself created the list of articles to be found in so far as I know the only independent reference source on the JWs, the Chryssides book whose articles are listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses/Articles, I don't even see this topic included in it
— User:John, 00:15, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Notability)