Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles L. Burgreen
Beneath the surface, there's plenty of press coverage: see https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599716/burgreen-1/ 1, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599741/burgreen-2/ 2, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599790/burgreen-3/ 3, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599830/burgreen-4/ 4, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599845/burgreen-5/ 5, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599868/burgreen-6/ 6, and https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599907/burgreen-7/ 7. While he may not have been the world's most noteworthy person, these sources amount to significant coverage, particularly considering 's statement that "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". Putting these sources together, we have more than enough to write a policy-compliant non-stub article, which means he's notable. ( makes an argument that bishops are automatically notable, but we needn't delve into that when the GNG is passed, as in this case
— User:Extraordinary, 00:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:BISHOPS (Wikipedia:Notability)