Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Bologna
on the basis that it is a |biography of a living person known for only one event. It would have been best not to mention "BLP2E" in the nomination, but what's done is done.  In my view, the 2004 incident is non-notable, except that investigative journalists have recently unearthed and revived discussion of that incident, but only in the context of researching Bologna's background because of the 2011 incident.  I do not believe that the 2004 incident has the sort of independent notability required to overcome .  Off2riorob did a good job of summarizing the arguments against this article early on, and Bbb23 also offered a good overview of the issues.  I agree, in particular, with the deletion arguments advanced by Collect and DGG.  ScottyBerg did a good job of critiquing the manifest weaknesses of the older sources.  Jarhed made many good points, although I disagree with Jarhed's specific contention that if Bologna was notable, there would already have been an article about him before the recent incident.  Instead, I would simply say that he was non-notable, so whether or not to have an article about him was not an issue until recent weeks.  I favor inclusion of neutral, well-referenced coverage of this pepper-spray incident in Occupy Wall Street, but I oppose a free-standing biography of this police officer at this time.  A redirect is fine with me as his name is a plausible search term
— User:Cullen328, 05:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)