Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignition (video game)
u|Hahnchen}},  does not mean it is covered widely, but that there need to be multiple coverage '''in detail'''. I found a PC Powerplay review https://archive.org/details/PCPowerplay018/page/n85 that is in-depth and reliable. There is a paragraph on Computer and Video Games https://web.archive.org/web/20070222111655/http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=8068 (with the coverage going very light on the game details, so I can't count this as something that adds to ). There is also a coverage on Pelit that is in-depth at https://www.pelit.fi/artikkelit/ignition/. Yes, there are reviews on Moby, but  says "the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition". I don't see the evidence that there is a significant coverage in those reviews (or if they are about that game), considering that reviews on Moby are added by users and there are no links (with some being unreliable). I may switch to a full keep if I see more, but for now I am undecided but leaning to keep (there are Pelit, PC Powerplay and Game.EXE
— User:Jovanmilic97, 19:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:NRV (Wikipedia:Notability)