Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spells in Harry Potter (3rd nomination)
and gut any |OR on etymology. Spells being you know a major element of HP, having an article on spells might actually make sense! Having already been noted by others that there's |reliable sources that can be used, one should note that notability is the pillar of Wikipedia inclusion citeria, and there can be no doubt spells in HP is notable. For the quoters of , I quote just one point while you use it to debate away in this AfD - "it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception". When the debate turns into what should be included in the article and how it should be presented, I encourage editors to participate in the article's talk page
— User:KTC, 11:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:FICT (Wikipedia:No original research)