Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retro metal
The article has a serious  problem: Notes do not contain information they are cited to contain, and might even be considered faked. Notes 1 and 2: Trivial mentions of the term "retro metal" on a page about Wolfmother. Note 3: Theilluminati.net, a band's (The Illuminati (band)|The Illuminati) own website, containing Revolver screenshot which is titled "Heavy Meta", and the article starts "Hipster rock acts Wolfmother, Witch and The Illuminati...". Thus, magazine article is not about "Hipster Metal" as claimed in the WP article and also, does not verify the sentence before it: ''It is not entirely clear the origins of the term "hipster metal", but music journalists have been using it in popular magazines such as Revolver, Classic Rock, Guitar World and Kerrang! since around 2005.'' Note 4: Again, about Wolfmother and used as a source for sentence ''Bands in this movement take influences from the originators of heavy metal such as Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, Blue Cheer and Deep Purple.'' Incorrect. Note 5: A commercial link (Amazon.com) to a compilation album, that could be considered promotional and spam. This seems both unverified and unverifiable. Also,  clearly states that "To support the use of (or an article about) a particular term we must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and papers ''about'' the term — not books and papers ''that use'' the term." Trivial mentions do not help the fact that the article is original research, and the only way to avoid that would be turning it into a one-sentence stub, a |dictionary definition
— User:Prolog, 08:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NEO||WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Verifiability)