Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Gower (5th nomination)
or '''redirect''' relevant info into Jagex; the subject clearly doesn't meet  or merit a standalone article when there are better targets. Another AfD the better part of a decade after is not inappropriate, and helping to make a hit video game does not make oneself independently notable. If you're using archived links for ''job descriptions'' to try and source someone's bio, it's a pretty good indication that they don't merit their own page. Of the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Gower&oldid=1011170670 eleven current sources, at least six are primary or not independent—documentaries by the game's developers, the aforementioned job posting, minutes from board events, etc. We've got a plainly unreliable source (Retireat21). We've got a listicle from the ''Telegraph'' where Gower (along with his brother) are merely one of dozens of individuals, and a ''Guardian'' story about ''Runescape'' (not focused on Gower)—these are not . That leaves the only source that specifically focuses on the brothers as the ''Develop'' source. What you end up with is three sentences you could cite in Jagex or ''Runescape'' about how it made the brothers rich
— User:David, 19:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)