Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trauma in film
the original research -- the list of films is purely subjective, and anyone can add an entry, depending on what their definition of trauma in film is.  In addition, the references are ''not'' focused on the topic of "trauma in film" -- it is the |synthesis of non-film-related trauma studies and coverage.  What does this http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/candy/2002/2002-06-12-candy-question.htm USA Today article even have to do with anything?  And the http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/talking_pictures/2007/07/if-a-film-made-.html Chicago Tribune article does not cover trauma in film, just examples of walkouts, like if a film was ''bad'', not filled with trauma.  If this article were to succeed at all, it would avoid listcruft and use academic studies of solely trauma in film, which I can't imagine -- there'd likely be subtopics, and this is too general of a definition
— User:Erik, 12:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)