Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Kralev
having gone through the article's references, most of them show that the subject has done a lot (present refs 4 to 47}, in line with 3. first part of  - "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.", but none of those references are useable for the second part of 3. - "In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." (instead the article looks like a , i know this doesn't mean the subject is not notable.) Refs 1 to 3 do discuss/review one of his books - ''America's Other Army'', so that book may warrant its own article, but it appears not so for the author
— User:Coolabahapple, 06:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:RESUME (Wikipedia:Notability)