Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sieve of Zakiya
as per most of the reasons already given above. Until someone demonstrates that the algorithm is |worthy of note (by, say, being able to factor one of the currently unfactored RSA numbers, or by showing that this algorithm is notably faster than existing algorithms), and more to the point, until a second source (i.e., someone other than the creator of the algorithm) mentions the algorithm in print, it's simply not ready to have its own WP article
— User:Loadmaster, 22:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)