Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pringle (activist) (3rd nomination)
The referencing here is not demonstrating a strong case that he's notable for being a candidate per se, but neither is it adequately demonstrating that he has preexisting notability for other reasons. All of the content about anything ''outside'' of the candidacy itself is based on a mix of |primary sources, interview clips in which he's the ''speaker'' and ''not'' the ''subject'' being spoken ''about'', and glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that are ''not'' substantively ''about'' him, none of which help to get him over GNG for that work in lieu of not passing NPOL — and the campaign coverage itself is not enough, in either volume or geographic range, to make his candidacy a special case over and above everybody else's candidacy
— User:Bearcat, 04:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)