Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tjako van Schie
I am getting the feeling that this entire AFD is mainly based upon  and . The majority of the keep votes are being based upon being the article's creator/writer (With no specifics why it is a good article), and the majority of the Delete votes basis seems to be that it was "Removed at the dutch wikipedia". I find both of these arguments not valid for this AFD. An article should be kept or removed based upon ''Its compliance with the relevant guidelines in its current form'', and NOT on the basis of having "Been removed before
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)