Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chemical compounds with unusual names (4th nomination)
and a sloppy wet trout for the nom. The inclusion criteria for this "List of X" are "what  says is considered X", and several are cited--that satisfies even the most deletion-minded reading of a stand-alone list article requirement. Those same sources that define terms and identify members were what led to the keep last time. The nom doesn't actually matter once the debate gets rolling (closure/consensus is of !votes based on their stated merits to keep/delete, not strict up/down agreement with stated nom
— User:DMacks, 21:24, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)