Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonders in civilization IV
If you look around, you *can* find coverage on different wonders here. A lot of reviews such as http://www.macworld.com/article/52067/2006/07/civ4.html this mention wonders. Some give actual critical feedback, like http://www.gamingnexus.com/Default.aspx?Section=Article&I=1567 "Most of the new Wonders weren’t all that impressive". Some go into detail on specific wonders, such as this review that says the Great Wall is "http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/civilization-iv-warlords/707249p1.html a pretty impressive sight considering the other tiny wonders on the main map, squished in as they are among the coliseums and aqueducts." There's also a number of books on game design that highlight wonders as being a major part of the civilization series, and tries to use it to teach good game design: powerful milestones for players, super abilities, and so on. But when I look at all of these, I don't see anything that persuades me we should have a '''list''' of every wonder in the game. Yeah, highlight a few wonders in the main article if they're a major part of why people loved or hated the game. Yes, explain the appeal of the wonder mechanism. But a list of every single wonder is |complete exposition and belongs in a , not for an encyclopedic summary of the game
— User:Randomran, 18:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NNC||WP:GAMEGUIDE (Wikipedia:Notability)