Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Problems of Onomastics
I would also accept a Merge, a/c {{U|Mark Viking}}) . The criteria we have been using for academic journals work nicely for journals in the academic mainstream in the sciences; they do not work well for journals whose notability is primarily limited to a particular country.  In almost all other fields at WP, national significance is all that is asked for. I think it should apply here also, and the fundamental reason is ultural bias. Otherwise we risk becoming only an encyclopedia of what is notable in the major English speaking countries, and such is not our intentions.   This journal is apparently part of the Russian academic mainstream, and therefore notable there; I consider this sufficient. I do not think there is however consensus among the very few of us working on academic journals about this, and would accept that in a period of unsettled consensus, a possible  way to go for the time being might be to find some sort of merge
— User:DGG, 04:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:C (Wikipedia:Copyrights)