Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of Jehovah's Witnesses
per /. The content is redundant, because it is already included into the JW main article and articles related to JW practices. If there is a disagreement about what to include to the literature list in the main article, it would be a POV fork to start a new article to be in control of what to include. I cannot see a comparability to lists of artists and authors complete work, is of relevance to this discussion, as this is an open topic with an unknown and possible huge number of possible relevant works, rather than a limited list
— User:Grrahnbahr, 00:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:REDUNDANTFORK||WP:POVSPLIT (Wikipedia:Content forking)