Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race Differences in Intelligence (book)
to Richard Lynn. I don't see a violation of NPOV: there is a lengthy section of criticism and responses. Although you say there is no uptake by serious scholars, the page cites 2 articles in scholarly journals, one of which is a review of this book, and Google Scholar claims 161 citeshttp://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&q=Race+Differences+in+Intelligence%3A+An+Evolutionary+Analysis&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=. There's also a review in ''Education Review''http://www.edrev.info/essays/v14n12.pdf. For me the only issue is whether it should be merged to Richard Lynn (whose article already includes a briefer discussion of the book) or kept; there maybe aren't enough sources yet to establish separate notability, and many sources seem to group together Lynn's ideas from multiple publications, so discussing them all at once makes sense. Remember, Wikipedia is  which means we don't delete discussion of ideas just because we find them distasteful
— User:Colapeninsula, 13:51, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)