Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Coppock
I'm all in favor of following Wikipedia guidelines. That's how/why I created the article and why I defended it with specific reasons for each of the items in . If someone wishes to refute those, how about using some specific arguments in the discussion rather than simply say that she "does not satisfy  or "?  I'll abide by whatever the Wikipedia community decides ... let's all remember that Wikipedia decisions are made by consensus and discussion, not majority voting
— User:Truthanado, 01:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR (Wikipedia:Notability)