Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Michael Lacey (2nd nomination)
Fails  by a country mile, and I'm quite staggered at both the notion that it's taking a second AfD to bounce this article and that, with 7-3 in favor of Delete and two of the Keep votes coming from SPAs, that this was closed as a No Consensus.  I would be extremely interested to have the previous closing admin explain why he took a baldfaced, unsourced, unproven assertion of notability from one of the SPAs and used that as a justification to close No Consensus ''without bothering to check on it.''  I swear, every time someone tells me "Wikipedia isn't a reliable source of information," I think of instances like these where people make presumptions without even pretending to check the facts first
— User:Ravenswing, 16:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)