Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Press (2nd nomination)
There is plenty of assertion of notability, but unfortunately it is not borne out by the sources. Uniformly except the patent, the references presented support only ancillary points, leaving the main thrust of each paragraph as unsupported |original research. References 13 and 15 are to the same article, which discusses Nitroglyn but not Press
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:original research (Wikipedia:No original research)