Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monasterio de Tarlac
The article has changed somewhat since I removed substantial copyright violations there, so editors might want to look at it again. If there are |independent reliable sources that attest to the notability of the place, I suggest that they should be added to the article so that other editors can evaluate them. At a first glance, the five web pages cited by {{u|RioHondo}} do not fulfill our criteria, but I'm open to discussion of that (yes, the Israelis have agreed to establish a farm there, for example; how does that make it notable?); the comment from {{u|NearEMPTiness}} is lifted from http://www.visitmyphilippines.com/index.php?title=BE%20HEALED%20BY%20THE%20RELIC%20OF%20THE%20TRUE%20CROSS&func=single&pid=48&Page=1&tbl=2 visitmyphilippines.com, a tourism site that one might confidently expect to indulge in unfounded assertions of importance; {{u|E.M.Gregory}} has cited a Google search as evidence of notability! (yes, really, a Google search!) Where is the in-depth coverage in independent sources? I'm not going to !vote for now, but as the page stands it is a no-brainer delete. If people want it kept I believe they should do some serious work on it
— User:Justlettersandnumbers, 18:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)