Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ataria (2nd nomination)
StarM moved this back to mainspace on my advice.  It looked likely notable and certainly improved in enough in sourcing to not be eligible for a speedy deletion as recreation.  On the merits, the sourcing in the article is still pretty thin but more sources are likely, perhaps in Basque, given it's status as a local attraction and nomination for the architecture.  Though sources are likely, those that are currently in the article are probably just short of the GNG lacking either independence or in depth coverage.  That would normally make my opinion a "week keep" at best, but given the other indicia of nobility (architecture nomination) and the subject (museum) I am comfortable opining straight "Keep" given that the pillar,  is fully met and it's solely a question of the more flexible  bar
— User:Eluchil404, 11:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:N (Wikipedia:Verifiability)