Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shock site (4th nomination)
More than enough coverage in reliable secondary sources to satisfy notability, but it sounds like the nomination is based on this article being too much like a list, which is not a reason for deletion but may be cause to rename it (I don't agree, but that would be the more appropriate course of action). Per  categories don't make lists/articles unnecessary. --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 17:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDUP (Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates)