Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Iranian sentiment (3rd nomination)
Wikipedia should always have a subject on something, even if unencyclopedic and POV-pushing; as long as, well, it's sourceable. The movie 300? Didn't you guys see that? The fact that a few very zealous Iranians think this movie has a sinister anti-Persian agenda - well, that means it ''must'' be encyclopedic. Why would we want Wikipedia to be neutral and factual; then we could no longer include fringe opinions and present them as obvious fact. As long as a few fringe people think something, it needs inclusion - even if it's not written in a POV tone. I for one think we need an article on the Anti-Semitism shown by Jesus, as well as one talking about Harry S. Truman's communist agenda (no need to write that 98% of the academic world thinks it's nonsense). Finally, I have to agree with the preponderance of other , , and "count the reference" arguments above
— User:The, 19:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:PERNOM (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)