Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definitions of Pogrom
The author of this amazing article spent an inordinate amount of time grinding a very large axe, selectively adducing various sources in order to try to support how this, that or the other is not a "pogrom" in some sense.  The point of this is utterly unclear - after all, for each given incident we can always tell the reader what happened and what the motivations were, use the common moniker for the event in the article title, and let the reader decide how to characterize what happened - a pogrom, a series of murders, a minor kerfuffle, or a birthday party that got out of hand.  I particularly enjoyed how 1918 Lwow is not a pogrom because xyz, while 1919 Pinsk is not a pogrom because abc "unlike Lemberg" - that gave me a chuckle.  Is this kind of crap covered under  or do I need a more precise policy justification? :) The author should seriously consider turning his or her considerable talents to some worthwhile goal, instead of this ineffective attempt at a  of Pogrom.  (And no, do not merge into Pogrom because the usage of the term is already adequately covered in that article
— User:Y, 16:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:FORK (Wikipedia:No original research)