Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Emken
A person does not get a Wikipedia article just for being a candidate in an election they didn't win — if you cannot show and |properly source that she cleared another notability criterion for some other reason ''besides'' her candidacy, then she has to win the election, not just run in it, to get an article because of the election itself. But this does not properly source any evidence that she cleared GNG for her autism work; that entire section is referenced ''exclusively'' to |primary sources, not reliable independent ones. And no, the fact that she ran and lost in a ''Senate'' race rather than a House of Reps seat does not automatically make her candidacy more notable than the norm — a Senate candidate has a better ''chance'' of either already having enough preexisting notability to qualify for an article or having her coverage expand ''beyond'' the  and expected norm that all candidates for all offices always get, but there's still no ''automatic'' inclusion freebie for ''all'' non-winning candidates at that level of office: it's still  or bust
— User:Bearcat, 18:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)