Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veracode
Like Michig, I fail to see what is so promotional in this article. The ''worst'' puffery in the article is {{tq|the company’s cloud-based service '''safeguards''' more than 600 organizations worldwide, including three of the top four banks in the Fortune 100 and more than 25 of the world’s top 100 brands.}} (emphasis mine) and the list of awards won. Now, if we remove the list of awards won on grounds of puffery and "churnalism", the next thing you know is that the article will be nominated for deletion (by the usual crew) because it fails . Gerard's assertions that Gartner is a "sponsored content outlet" border on are ridiculous; kindly nominate Magic Quadrant for deletion to test it. For all its shortcomings and bias, being listed (at the top of) on the Magic Quadrant is a major achievement by any company https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-2KW56YW&ct=150807 so it passes  with flying colors
— User:No, 13:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)