Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Moates (2nd nomination)
This article is ''not'' showing that Moates has been the ''subject'' of enough |reliable source coverage to pass  — this is based entirely on |primary source (e.g. his own contributor profiles on websites he's directly affiliated with), YouTube clips, glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of someone or something other than him, and sources which are entirely tangential to him because they entirely fail to even mention his name at all. This is ''not'' how you demonstrate a person as notable enough for a Wikipedia article
— User:Bearcat, 21:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)