Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futaba Channel
Bah, I just spent about two hours digging through machine-translated pages from google.co.jp and news.google.co.jp. Literally nothing. I'm thoroughly convinced we're not going to find "reliable, third-party, published sources" for this topic as of now - but the article has to stay. It's far too popular to be non-notable; perhaps the sources policy can merely be |overlooked, with the hope that supporting references will appear in the future? To quote from : "''an article which may currently be poorly written, poorly formatted, '''lack sufficient sources''', or not be a comprehensive overview of the subject, can be improved and rewritten to fix its current flaws. That such an article is lacking in certain areas is a relatively minor problem, and such articles can still be of benefit to Wikipedia.''" With that in mind, it's clear that there's no benefit to be had from deletion here. I'll reiterate my '''strong keep
— User:Luinfana, 05:00, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IGNORE||WP:NOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)