Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Chapman (Canadian) (2nd nomination)
just about. I never liked articles with 40 references where 30 of them are non-independent, but there does appear to be a small number of substantial sources about the person, both at local (London Free Press) and national level (ABC). Probably meets , which is just as well as he fails pretty much all of the additional criteria at 
— User:Alzarian16, 11:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:ENT (Wikipedia:Notability)