Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Kish
spaced ndash}}The statement that the individual lacks reliable sources per an entire guideline page, , doesn't provide any specific rationale for deletion of the article, and exists as a generic, blanket statement without any form of actual qualification. Referring to entire pages of guidelines fails to qualify specific reasons for notability or lack thereof, and equates to referring to an entire list of multiple, specific rationales as a singular, generic rationale for article deletion. This logic equates to stating that an article should be deleted because of any reason on a guideline page. These types of illogical qualifications and arguments are absolutely invalid, and exist as the Fallacy|logical fallacy of hasty generalization. Specific examples from guideline pages are valid and should be considered
— User:Northamerica1000, 05:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NSPORT (Wikipedia:Notability)