Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divorce Recovery
the parts that I didn't strike out as copyvio are basically copyvio of http://divorceafter50.com/Divorce/stages-of-recovery.html this source (and it also looks like the sourcing may have just been copied from there, rather than checked directly, which is a no-no.) Strike what's there, and we're basically left with an opening sentence, sourced to a dictionary definition that doesn't cover it, on a page that would have to be moved anyway due to Improper Title Capitalization. This is not to say that an article on this topic could not arise under a similar title and be acceptable, but as it stands, it's looking pretty  to me
— User:NatGertler, 19:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:G12 (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)