Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProFicient
as although it ''sounds'' like it ''might'' be notable, I can't find WP:notability|significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so we can't |verify the contents of the article. I had a good look, searching for "InfinityQS" rather than "ProFicient" (too many false positives for the latter, and any ''significant'' coverage would include the name of the company): {{findsources|InfinityQS}}. The News hits appear to be reprints of press releases, as does the existing ref in the article, so don't count as independent reliable sources. There are some ''mentions'' in books, but no sign of ''significant'' coverage. It's true that there are many other statistical packages with articles, but |that's not a good argument against deletion—quite a few of them probably don't meet our WP:notability|criteria for notability either (though I wouldn't go as far as
— User:Ihcoyc, 11:32, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:verify (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)