Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMICS Publishing Group (2nd nomination)
Having reviewed this article's sourcing, it seems to me it easily passes our notability guidelines, nor has any other policy-consistent deletion rationale been supplied--point in fact, for that reason, this is an extremely flawed nomination, OTRS or no.  Addressing the comments of those two editors who have thus far !voted for delete, I can't see how this article constitutes an attack page simply by virtue of the fact that the sources we utilize are overwhelmingly critical of the company; there's no shortage of articles on topics for which the bulk of our sources are largely critical.   doesn't mean that we present every topic as if the wider world were ambivalent about it.  Rather it means that we keep our personal perspectives out of the matter and only report what reliable sources say, as accurately as we can.  As such, our neutrality policies will often require us to relay information that is decidedly critical of a topic, from multiple sources, specifically because we do not filter the information through out own perspectives
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)