Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janetta Thomas
There are, sort of, three "sources" here. One is from Gerontology Research Group web pages. There's some controversy about whether GRG pages are simply not |reliable, whether they are biased against non-western centenarians or whether they are primary sources, prohibited for citation by . Whichever way one goes, they cannot be the sole source for an article. The second is a footnote referencing the Guardian, a reliable source. But it sources practically no facts and cannot be verified because no link is provided. The final "source" is described in the text as a photo that ran in the Times on the subject's birthday. The Times is a fine newspaper and a reliable source. But there's no link here either. Information might be from an accompanying article, but it could also be from a cut line or extended caption. Such captioning is much less reliable than an article. Without more, this slender reed is not enough to serve as foundation for an article on Wikipedia
— User:David, 22:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)