Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Erhard vs. Columbia Broadcasting System (2nd nomination)
The lawsuit lasted only 2 months and never resulted in a decision or precedent. It just isn't independently notable enough to warrant it's own article. And yes, the material in this article is already handled in the Werner Erhard article and has been for some time.  This article about the lawsuit began as a  by an editor who has since been sanctioned for creating these sorts of biased articles about this individual.  This article was an attempt to give new life to old allegations that never were anything more than allegations. This is unduly harmful to a living person and against the spirit of . Given that there is no notability to the lawsuit itself, and that the material is handled in the Werner Erhard article already, there is no justification for keeping this article
— User:MLKLewis, 21:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)