Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic Bible Contradictions
OK, some things to be going on with when working on this article: Wikipedia:Weasel_words|avoid weasel words such as ''"It is a widespread (but not universal) belief..."''.  This tells a researcher and a casual reader precisely nothing about the scope and depth of the topic under discussion and, more importantly, attempt to cover a Point of View.  Articles shouldn't be partisan and  is a guide to avoiding this stance.  The article tells me nothing about the dispute between the two authors but instead prompts in my mind the question "What line is the author trying to push in the debate?".   Secondly, presenting illustrative quotes to raise awareness of a debate is not the same as contributing an encyclopædic article about said debate.  Wikipedia:How_to_write_a_great_article|How to write a great article is a good guide towards constructing something for inclusion in WP.  Please read it whilst thinking of further improvements.  Why not precis the debate?  What is the context?  What are the points of view of the contending authors?  A NPOV guide to the debate is worth far more than a series of quotations which are really quite boring to read.  Sources and citations for researchers?  Is this debate continued in journals of religious studies?  References to these would be really worth having for any researcher interested in the debate. In summary, NPOV; introduction with topic & scope; analysis of POV of subjects' work; one or two illustrative quotes so as not to disrupt the flow of the article; summary if appropriate; citations, references and further reading.  I hope that my comments are useful.  I would like to read about the debate but I can gain nothing from reading this article as it stands
— [[User:(aeropagitica)|'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;''']], 21:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)