Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raman Bhardwaj (2nd nomination)
Err ... he "appears notable" because he's listed in a category with other presenters who, themselves, ''might'' be notable?  Nonsense.  Not only is |notability not inherited, never mind venereal, the GNG requires that the subject be cited in "significant detail" in multiple reliable, independent sources.  Twitter feeds don't constitute independent sources.  A self-submitted bullet point bio on a newspaper's blogsite does not constitute "significant detail" ''or'' independent.  Pulling up a search for him on Google UK shows the top hits being the usual ones for insignificant subjects: this Wikipedia article, his Facebook page, his Twitter page, his Bebo page, his Linkedin page, his Google Plus page and other forums and social media.  A Google News UK search, by contrast, turns up empty
— User:Ravenswing, 16:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)