Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombietime
per lack of apparent existance of substantial reliable sources.  Sources that discuss this website either only mention it in passing, or are themselves not up to the muster at , many only marginally above the "blog" level of reliability.  If actual, mainstream, reliable sources could be shown to discuss this website in depth (not just in passing) then I could be persueded that the article could be kept.  But I don't see anything right now that looks promising
— User:Jayron32, 21:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)