Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittany Pettibone
Doesn't look to be quite enough to pass /. That said, I don't buy the / rationales for deletion. There's a similar justification associated with another recent AfD for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (4th nomination)|Jacob Barnett. Whereas he was a child, making claims inappropriately reported upon by the media, with exposure in large part through his parents, she is an adult with coverage about her words and activities made in public, as a public person. If there's significant coverage of her in reliable sources, then as long as we present it neutrally, without disproportionately emphasizing the negative, it's not a problem for BLP. But, again, I don't see quite enough that GNG is satisfied here. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 03:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:ATTACK||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)