Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistakes were made
a perfectly good stand-alone article, |well-referenced, for a cliched phrase.  Not exactly the same as a "non-apology apology", and I see no pursuasive argument to delete or to merge it, so neither redirect or merger would improve the encyclopedia.  The nomination is of the  variety
— User:Bearian, 20:28, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)