Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Hoyt
I am saddened to see that there is obvious sing going on here but I also see good arguments regarding the notability despite it not having been sourced before in the article. My question is which option is most likely to craft a good article back. Is it the  process suggested by Trillfendi or the eer Review option suggested by Letcreate123? I am fully willing to rescind my nomination to whichever of these is the best option as long as consensus can be agreed to on what will most likely make a good article
— User:6YearsTillRetirement, 04:09, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CANVAS||WP:DRAFTIFY||WP:P (Wikipedia:Canvassing)