Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cockblock (4th nomination)
let's take this slowly as it's plainly a bit of a pinkie trap, given the 4 previous AfDs with differing outcomes. Having read through all of them - quite fascinating, actually - it seems that when this topic is written up hastily, it comes across as obviously unencyclopedic and , so everyone agrees to delete. If it's written up over-enthusiastically with graphic detail of how to cockblock,  cuts in and people at once say delete. But if it's written up a bit more subtly with more citations, people angrily insist it's a perfectly valid topic and vote keep! This 5th incarnation is on the  side, by the way, but we could easily add some of the old citations back to confuse matters
— User:Chiswick, 19:36, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NAD||WP:HOWTO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)