Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victimless crime (political philosophy)
I don't understand Ultiam's logic; by that argument thousands of Wikipedia articles would be impossible to write. There are thousands of potential sources on Google Scholar alone, suggesting that secondary sources have already defined the parameters of discussion sufficiently to satisfy academic rigor. Obviously there is not going to be one universal definition, but that's why we have |a policy for handling it. Sometimes a crime is implicitly victimless but contains a moral hazard, making "society" (or "us all") the alleged victim. We just have to attribute such categorizations, not decide whether they're right. Certainly the general topic of victimless crime is of encyclopedic notability
— User:Dhartung, 02:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)