Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Talerico (2nd nomination)
I'm ''astonished'' that anyone could advocate keeping this at the prior AfD.  What conceivable criterion of  can a two-year-old pass?  Or shift this to the GNG; even presuming there's a source out there discussing the subject in "significant detail," what significant detail could there BE about someone who's working on mastering speech for the first time?  The three Keep votes from the prior AfD ran respectively through "She meets the GNG" (which she doesn't), "The entire show revolves around her character" (which it doesn't), "There are sources" (which is irrelevant if they don't discuss the subject in significant detail) and "One episode has aired" (which forms no part of valid inclusion criteria).  This is one of those cases where the closing admin should have gone for policy over counting votes (well, shouldn't they ''all'' be?) and I hope folks have better sense this time out
— User:Ravenswing, 17:17, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ENTERTAINER (Wikipedia:Notability)