Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayaram Padikkal (2nd nomination)
The current stub contains enough |reliable sources to establish |notability and appears to be both accurate and |neutral.  I noticed in the sources that Padikkal is deceased but no date or circumstances of death are included in the article.  He was/is controversial.  From the sources already listed, he was involved in and influenced historic episodes in the history of India.  I judge that editors will eventually find consensus on how to deal with the controversies in a neutral manner and more sources to improve the article so it becomes truly encyclopedic.  Until then, it needs close watching to revert attempts to add inappropriate and unsourced text
— User:Doctree, 21:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)