Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Andrew Kelly
No offense, but I find this interpretation of  odd.  Surely this portion of the policy is aimed at individuals who no one is going to write about, or want to read about, once they have been rescued?  If an individual has ongoing press coverage, if there are ongoing updates, after the first week or so of sensational coverage of a singular event, then surely they no longer meet the criteria of "one event".  Further updates show there is likely to be an ongoing need for the wikipedia to cover the topic.  Even if, for the sake of argument, that ongoing press coverage is largely sensational, there is likely to be some central core to the story that can be covered from a neutral point of view and cite reliable sources.  Readers who read a sensational story might want to look to the wikipedia to see whether there is any central non-sensational aspect behind sensational headlines.  Suppressing coverage of material based on this interpretation of  seems to me to be a serious disservice to our readership
— User:Geo, 15:33, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)