Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paymentsense
I'm inclined to go with nom - they receive a lot of mentions in various places, but only a few meeting , including the actual Financial Times ref. The other bits are fasttrack working with the FT, and their paragraphs on each company on the list come across as more like advertising rather than reliable sources. Nothing else cropped up in my  sweep
— User:Nosebagbear, 13:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)