Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelma Maine-Jackson
This is a rather on-the-fence one. The arguments made by David Eppstein and bender235 leave me somewhere in the middle. I think David Eppstein's argument has been stronger on matter of policy, but I'm still not convinced WP:GNG is met. The Scientific American post about her is certainly part of a blog, and though I lack familiarity with this magazine's structure, I don't believe she works for the magazine itself; she only blogs there. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/rosetta-stones/about/ Here is her about page on the blog. I believe this scenario falls under  which states {{tq|Several newspapers, magazines, and other news organizations host online columns they call blogs. These may be acceptable sources if the writers are professionals, but use them with caution because blogs may not be subject to the news organization's normal fact-checking process
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEWSBLOG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)