Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zara Kay
The citations are reliable sources, the article has been enhanced, it was never lacking for citations, and the subject (Zara Kay) is notable. The appropriate policy for guidance of notability for an article about a ''person'' is Wikipedia:Notability (people), not : "A topic is presumed to merit an article if: It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right", which would be Wikipedia:Notability (people) (NBIO). See  for a short paragraph on NBIO criteria. This article, and its subject Zara Kay, meet that criteria. There is "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". And if you don't agree it's substantial then I point you to there being "multiple independent sources combined to demonstrate notability." Those |primary source citations, such as podcasts, have been used in the article solely to support simple biographical information such as religion of upbringing, nationality of father, university attended, age and date of immigration to Australia, participation in religious activity, and community backlash after stopping wearing a hijab. None of those facts are controversial, nor are needed to establish notability. The subject meets NBIO's notability criteria. For these reasons, we should keep the article
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:Notability)