Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet naming
is well sourced, despite the fact it is a stub. There are entire books written on the subject, as you can see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=pet%20names&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp here. This goes far beyond the requirement for . The rationale behind the deletion is nothing more than  ("just not notable"), while the other comments appear to be , |PERMAJORITY, and |Just unencyclopedic
— User:Shaliya, 07:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:JNN||WP:PERNOM||WP:MAJORITY||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC (Wikipedia:Notability)