Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GURPS 4e Basic Set
For one thing, it would be very hard to claim that these are promotional articles, given that most of them are years out of print, and ascribing malicious intent to the same is at best a  violation.  For another, many have received industry awards, making a ''prima facie'' case for notability; calling them "related" trade associations works only if you assert that these associations are functionaries of Steve Jackson Games, a curious argument for which I'd be interested in seeing your evidence.  As it stands, it is difficult to take seriously a nomination that lacks evidence of taking seriously the notability of each case
— User:RGTraynor, 18:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)