Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Lazarus (2nd nomination)
So heavily promotional that it could be a case for #G11, it is not obvious that any of the sources present in the article are in-depth, neutral, reliable, and independent, and good sources were also not obvious in searching. I'm not convinced that he doesn't pass , but I'm also not convinced that he does, and in any case  applies to the current text
— User:David, 00:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CSD||WP:GNG||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)