Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Aleksander
Starts off with "...is considered one of the most outstanding pianists of his country.", which constitutes |weasel wording (considered by who?) and |peacock phrasing.  Then the whole article just goes downhill from there.  No |sourcing, no |external references, practically no cross-referencing to other articles, no |attribution, no |verifiability, not even a hint of |neutrality.  Reads like a junior high biography essay - was someone assigned to write a "positive" 500-word theme on their local piano teacher as punishment for not practicing?  Or maybe it is a cut-and-paste job from his personal web site, or local music store was holding a competitive recital and featured him as a "judge" and needed some background information?  In any case this is not encyclopedic and virtually unfixable even with enormous effort by a dedicated editor.  If there is already an "improved" and "cleaned up" version already prepared, then let the authors defend that version in a future AfD if it comes to that
— User:T, 18:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AWW||WP:PEACOCK||WP:RS||WP:EL||WP:ATT||WP:V||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)