Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identical (film)
This is so far short of the general standard envisaged by  that it would require substantial, in-depth independent coverage to qualify for an article, and I don't see it. The references cited are: 1. A press release, 2. The founder of the festival talking about the film it's going to show, 3. Interview with the writer/director in IFQ, 4. Rotten Tomatoes entry showing no reviews. That's not enough. "''Films produced in the past, which were either not completed or not distributed, should not have their own articles unless their failure was notable per the guidelines.''" This wasn't a notable failure, it wasn't a notable anything
— User:JohnCD, 07:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NF (Wikipedia:Notability)