Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABC Riverina
Per all above. I concur that large numbers of independent reliable sources are likely to be available for most, if not all. A number of the articles already have been expanded and referenced justifying their retention. I'd strongly suggest that the nominator withdraw this |AFD and that an evaluation of each article be undertaken on a case by case basis
— User:Dan, 07:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)