Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConnMan
I'm usually a deletionist and was all ready to !vote that way based on the completely worthless sources cited, which amount to two obviously  blog posts and a link to the download site.  But Googling quickly turned up an http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/06/intels-linux-connman-examining-the-pros-and-conns/ ArsTechnica article, http://books.google.com/books?id=XsXBLIZHiq0C&pg=PA79&dq=%22ConnMan%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kO_FU8KUCZK8oQTU9YLIAg&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22ConnMan%22&f=false a book and http://www.caixamagica.pt/sites/default/files/respondr/2011-oss.pdf an article on scholar.  I think this qualifies as multiple reliable independent secondary sources and is enough to establish notability.  (We ''often'' accept far less.)  Since our only concern at AfD is notability, which we decide based on available sources, not merely the sources cited, I must !vote to keep.  I'm as surprised as anyone
— User:Msnicki, 03:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)