Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathmo
as a term it violates  and  there is also no establishment of notability. Name drops are trivial coverage. The link above to google news is nothing more than half a dozen name drops of the term. The only source which gives it any coverage is a university/college level news paper which does not confer notability. If some reliable sources start writing articles about the term Mathmo, then feel free to recreate the article. As it stands its a term that is barely used in mainstream language and is barely on the radar. We're not a compendium of all human knowledge and that we're not a place for things you made up at school one day (which the policy may still say, if not its rather appropriate here
— User:Crossmr, 01:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)