Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epiphenomenon
Let's not rush to judgement here. The entry is distinctly dictionary-like, as is what you get if you Google the term. The example applications could help to rescue the article, but they are dangerously close to being  with 5 of 7 paragraphs without citations. If we can have some decent citations, listed here if not in the article itself, then I'd be persuaded to vote to keep: if not, we could send it to Wiktionary
— User:Chiswick, 14:45, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)