Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
as unencyclopedic and severely undue weight to a minority viewpoint as well as synthesis of facts in order to support a hypothesis in violation of . A minority viewpoint("hypothesis") does not require a full article explanation and this current treatment goes way afield of 's dictum on undue weight and POV fork. The prime contributor to his article has admitted it is a vehicle for presenting his POVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Controlled_demolition_hypothesis_for_the_collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center&diff=77564182&oldid=77544991., in gross violation of , , and . Delete with prejudice
— User:Mmx1, 05:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)