Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massacre of Running Waters
The concerns about the motivations of the (now-blocked) creator of the article may be valid, but I have to agree with Michael Bendarek here that there's no sound policy-based reason for deletion of this article. While some on the left disagree with some of Blainey's historical views, there is no question that he is a well-respected Australian historian and certaintly isn't someone where we can just disregard his writing. My feeling (in good faith) is that the nom's concerns about the article are really concerns about |ensuring a neutral point of view and could be easily fixed by some edits to the page rather than deleting the article. As Wikipedia requires |alternatives to deletion to be considered first, editing the article to improve it should be the first option
— User:Deus, 09:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)