Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter2Geo
WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a publisher of first instance, and cannot sustain an article without |reliable, '''independent''' sources or based on |original research.  One of Wikipedia's fundamental premises is that it has articles on that of which the world has taken notice, not on things of which certain parties would ''like'' the world to take notice.  Of course Wikipedia accepts notable scholarly journals as |reliable sources, and should this project be written up in them by uninvolved observers, an article on it can be sustained.  Should any of the Keep proponents wish to overturn Wikipedia's policies, I recommend going to the talk pages of those policies and attempt to sway consensus to their POV.  In the meantime, the conclusion to draw on an article on a project that some people think is important (but which otherwise violates one or more inclusion guidelines) is not having to change the guidelines to fit the article in.  It's that an article on the subject can't be sustained
— User:Ravenswing, 18:46, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)