Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Egerton
very weak claims of importance, and winning a couple of local "readers' choice" polls doesn't convey encyclopedic notability. Insufficient non-trivial coverage in multiple  to meet . Nominator's assertion that this is |walled garden spam is reasonable
— User:Kinu, 08:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:WG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)