Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Wing Chun terms
Really? Nothing is |verifiable? Even if we disregard the notability of Wing Chun, there are plenty of academic sources that would corroborate the terms listed in this glossary. To illustrate the point, here are the first two terms in this glossary in two separate academic sources: https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=H7s0CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA192&dq=%22Wing+Chun%22+terms&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Siu%20Nim%20Tau&f=false Siu Nim Tau (SUNY Press), https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=Ux0NCwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22Wing+Chun%22+terms+glossary&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Chum%20Kiu&f=false Chum Kiu (Tuttle Publishing
— User:Alex, 15:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)