Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norton PC Checkup
on the basis that it is notable and verifiable, which are our primary criteria.  I don;t think you can dismiss an article in CNET News as Original research, you know.  To me that passes  with some ease.  Sources can always be improved and a poor source is not a valid reason to nominate for deletion, simply a reason to enhance an article.  There are intriguing sources that do not pass our criteria which discuss some controversy about the service.  Finding a reliable one would be valuable
— User:Timtrent, 23:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)