Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Rite Cathedral (Pasadena, California)
I'm not intending on voting in this.  Given that this building is not ''listed'' it doesn't pass the NRHP project notability position, however if one takes a fairly generous position on the meaning of ''non trivial'' and ''independent of the subject'' then there are likely to be sufficient sources to meet the needs of the | General Notability Guideline.  Personally I'd say that rather abuses the notion of notability, but the majority of votes do tend to take a fairly lax position around evidence.  There are a number of aspects of this article, as with many of the similar stub articles, that would benefit from clarification around meaning and accuracy.  The use of the NRHP forms as a source does leave me considering our position on Primary and Secondary sources, the form looks like a primary source to me
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)