Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rules of chess
One of the most overzealous and unhelpful interpretations of  I've ever seen and I've seen plenty. This is interpreting two words in a frequently ambiguously worded policy, and the sections on History and Controversy clearly make this not "just a game guide". And does the nominator really have to reply to ''every single editor'' recommending keep
— User:Canley, 13:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)