Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reform Taoism
In response to Milestokilo, the Reform Taoism website is a |primary source and thus is insufficient to confer notability on the topic of the page, regardless of the |number of pageviews it gets.  (And frankly, even if the number of pageviews were relevant, barely 100K in over a year isn't that many.)  Wikipedia itself is a tertiary source, and thus information in Wikipedia should be based on secondary or tertiary sources, not primary sources
— User:Chuck, 16:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:BIGNUMBER (Wikipedia:No original research)