Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batman of Zur-En-Arrh
Honest question:  Have those individuals who have stated there are references for this article actually looked at those references?  Please see my comment above that none of the three web links are to sources with non-trivial coverage of the subject.  The discussion here is whether this article passes wikipedia's guidelines, not if it's "interesting" or because someone slapped three random links at the bottom of the article.  A one or two sentence mention of the character in a much longer article on a broader subject is, I believe, the definition of trivial coverage per . I don't hate this article, and I actually think merging it to either article mentioned sounds like a good idea, I'm just surprised that there's any discussion of keeping it
— User:Markeer, 20:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)