Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! in popular culture (2nd nomination)
IA is an essay,  applies to article sections, and this article is not just a "list of isolated facts", but more like a list of lists of isolated facts, with each list in its own section, which is what articles are. Jeopardy! is a particularly notable show, enough to have picked up a variety of references from other notable shows during its time. This significance in popular culture warrants an article of it in popular culture. It is unsourced for the same reason most plot summaries are unsourced, though you can verify each item by perusing the specific work. Has there been some published study referring to Jeopardy! as an important cultural phenomenon? I don't know, but just look at this list with  SENSE. The grouping of these cultural references is not inherently . If you cite #IINFO, please explain why it does not belong on Wikipedia, as that policy says nothing about this particular article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, so what is it about this article that makes Wikipedia more of an indiscriminate collection of information such as this? The article itself cannot be 'indiscriminate'; it has a definite scope and a maintainable size. It being 'trivial' only means it is useless to you, which is a purely subjective claim. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheel of Fortune in popular culture
— [[User talk:Pomte|Pomte]], 11:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TRIV||WP:COMMON||WP:OR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)