Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rory Blackwell
Subject is clearly notable.  Nominator's basis boils down to a claim of a violation of voiding harm.  But I see nothing in the article that approaches that, and if there were, the appropriate response would be to correct the article, not to delete it.  The subject's dissatisfaction with his inability to control the article content is not a ground for deletion
— User:TJRC, 18:33, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A (Wikipedia:Attribution)