Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shock sites (fourth nomination)
The coverage of shock sites is not what is objectionable, it's the notability of such sites being listed here. There is no problem with having an article on shock sites in general, or certain well-known shock sites getting articles. However, what is not needed is a list containing every random shock site people can think of and throw up onto a list. Also, #Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files|Wikipedia articles are not mere collections of external links or Internet directories
— User:WarpstarRider, 20:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)