Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Bryan
I was originally going to vote delete in agreement with the nom, in the sense that while he is well known, it is only because he is doing his job. However  says ''"is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published, secondary source material"''. After sifting thru google, weeding out all the ones that just referred to him doing his job, I found this http://www.listener.co.nz/issue/3560/features/11582/geoff_bryan_.html. So I believe he passes. I do however disagree with the argument that he is notable just because he is known from TV. That just makes him known, not necessarily notable
— User:Esradekan, 02:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)