Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surfing (Counter-Strike) (third nomination)
because , but I think Reinoutr is making a perfectly valid point here.  Speedy delete should be used sparingly, and not in the case of articles with substantially different content.  This is still bad, but it's a *different* bad article with little hope of salvage, and must go through the process again.  Of course, if it's a copyvio, then that would warrant speedy delete, but otherwise he's right.  In some cases AFD is used because a full rewrite from scratch is preferable to a current mangled article.  That should be respected, and articles rewritten in good faith should go through the AFD process again, in full
— User:129, 13:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)