Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside Bozeman
This is pretty much the same article as from a year and a half ago, obviously written as part of the magazine's publicity effort and carefully tailored to squeeze every last droplet of "notability" from the relative stones which are the sources here.  And what are those sources?  An "alums done good" writeup in a college paper, a blog post on the website of a local radio station advertising the magazine's $250 contest, a half sentence in the Washington Post, and a three-minute "local interest" interview on a Montana TV station's morning show (which, again, is not really about the magazine but about its contest).  There's really nothing here that can possibly add up to "significant coverage."  If every throwaway interview, day after day, on local TV stations created notability, my grandmother's quilting club would be notable by now.  The keep !votes above run the range from blatant sockery to  to an irrelevant remark about its circulation -- last time I checked, didn't they give this thing away for free
— User:Glenfarclas, 05:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WAX (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)