Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Salaskar
The article passes the GNG, and as Sarvagnya and others point out, there are RS's mentioning him before he died.  So even contorting  to apply to him (deceased) , he doesn't fit, as he isn't a one event guy.  A more appropriate guideline is , which is worded a little less stringently.  But in addition to there being RS's with info on him apart from the 1E,  it contains the clause "unless ... sources have written primarily about the person"  to make it consistent with the GNG (2RS=N). So even under the strictest interpretation, BIO1E thus does ''not'' really apply to this article.  In any case, BLP1E and BIO1E suggest  ''redirection'', not deletion.   When there are substantial RS's like newspaper articles that put a person or a topic in the title, the article is very rarely, perhaps never, something suitable for deletion. There are sources specifically about him, with him in the title in the refs - perhaps they weren't there when the debate started. But now it is clear that according to our policies and guidelines, this is a keep. What BLP1E and BIO1E and Not a memorial are for is to discourage articles on people like the ''victims'' of such attacks, private individuals for which  an article based on reliable sources would just say things like "died in the attack" and  little more, and who at most should be treated in a list or as a redirect to the "one event.".  Not people who have gained real notability, or attracted more notability, due to their prominence & actions in the "one event
— User:John, 09:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)