Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Thomas Hamblin
what you're referring to is  which with poor grammatical form tacks on "had works in many significant libraries".  This allows in a lot of authors which is a good thing but then there is the "many" and "significant" to weigh.  In this particular case I would honestly say it is only a few significant libraries that hold his works, not many. There are some major university and research libraries among those but few "popular" libraries and no library seems to hold a complete collection of his works.  So it is mixed at best.  I'll change my opinion from "delete" to '''neutral''' because if there is a near-consensus that the number of libraries holding his works is sufficient for notability then I don't want to stand in the way. Still doesn't meet  though
— User:Drawn, 02:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)