Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet psychic
Just because there's a lot of words in the reference section, doesn't mean its notable. All I see are sources covering broader pseudo-scientific claims (which fail to offer the required "significant coverage"), and a lot of non neutral primary sources. Fails 
— User:Sloane, 17:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)