Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Hamence with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948
both articles and merge only the necessary details into their respective biographies. I completely agree with the nominator's views. Even to someone with a keen interest in cricket history, Hamence was an obscure player at the international level with only three Tests under his belt and what he did on this tour doesn't deserve a separate article. The article goes into an awful lot of detail about what he did in the less important matches of the tour, and that isn't interesting even to me who normally enjoys reading about old cricket matches. The same can be said regarding the McCool article. Maybe we can further improve the Ron Hamence article in time to promote it to FA status and post it on the Main Page instead. For the record, I'm voting "delete" not because  but because it's non-notable as an independent subject. Special:Contributions/1.39.62.143|1.39.62.143
— [[User talk:1.39.62.143|talk]]), 21:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)