Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalog numbering systems for single records
Wow, the direction of this AFD is baffling to me. I've never seen so many experienced editors advocate keeping an article without any reliable sources present and without proposing any new usable ones. (at least not since the pre-2010 AFD days.) Yes, AFD is not cleanup, but that doesn't change that nothing beyond anecdotal "" arguments have been given so far in favor of keeping. No one has established how this meets the . "There's potential to improve this" type arguments are only valid when an actual potential path forward is presented - like providing actual reliable sources that could be used. No one has done that, and improvement hasn't happened organically since its inception in 2005
— User:Sergecross73, 13:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)