Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeek
I find the responses to my request above to be unsubstantial. Continuing with the crutch of a multiplicity of sources, and simply the opinion that the sources check out as significant non-promo coverage, isn't enough to counter SwisterTwister's analysis.  Also,  isn't necessarily as time-restrictive as suggested -- it's about whether a subject has ''yet'' proven itself notable. There's no timetable set for that
— User:Stevietheman, 13:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)