Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam4Adam
Fails .  I've looked at every one of the sources (bar the NYT which is members only) and aside from the FlavaMen review (which is questionable) not one of the sources has Adam4Adam as the subject of the article, mostly they are just brief mentions
— User:One, 05:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)