Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 27
Per  and  ("It incorporates elements of general and ''specialized'' encyclopedias..." - my emphasis), something covered in http://www.amazon.com/UFC-Encyclopedia-BradyGames/dp/0756683610 an actual published printed encyclopedia that devotes multiple prose paragraphs beyond just results to each event is by definition encyclopedic.  The results of this event moreover are not merely covered on Sherdog; indeed other sites provide detailed reviews of the event (for example, http://www.sportsoratory.com/?id=156 here), and even more importantly they are discussed again in prose paragraphs in published books demonstrating their ongoing significance to the history of the notable fighters who participated on this card: http://books.google.com/books?id=XlzaQ9GozpEC&pg=PA123&dq=%22UFC+27%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=raOeT7OmGIr06AG9hK2bDw&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22UFC%2027%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=S1a0M_otVYYC&pg=PA69&dq=%22UFC+27%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=raOeT7OmGIr06AG9hK2bDw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22UFC%2027%22&f=false, etc.  To suggest that this event is not encyclopedic is frankly absurd and reflects a lack on knowledge/familiarity with this subject matter and how to research/look for sources per .  --Special:Contributions/24.112.202.78|24.112.202.78
— [[User talk:24.112.202.78|talk]]), 14:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:FIVEPILLARS||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means)