Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Gosvami Maharaja
This article fails  and . Based on the above discussion, I thought I was going to find lots of sources to evaluate. However, I was very surprised that searches on Google News and Scholar, NYT, JSTOR and Academic OneFile did not produce a single source: no passing mentions, no short bios and no reviews of his work. In the evaluation of the sources listed above, I am still not convinced they show notability as defined by Wikipedia at . We can't use his own publications to show notability because they are not secondary sources. Fan pages, Facebook pages and blog posts are not reliable. VNN doesn't have a masthead and accepts articles from "contributors" so they are not reliable. Therefore, I recommend deletion. My vote might change if at least two links to profiles or reviews of his work are posted that pass : "Significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Claims that he is notable, without a link to a source I can check myself, will not convince me that he is notable
— User:Z1720, 02:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)