Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginger Jolie
She also gets 186,000 ghits, and 40,000 image hits. You have to be realistic here, her lack of privacy is not related to her Wikipedia article. She is clearly notable via either /. She even has an http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1422951/ IMDB Profile and Penthouse is still selling all her DVDs, as are dozens of other stores. Her status as Pet of the Month is easily sourcable. She isn't a crime victim here folks. Her BIO is listed on MANY other websites already, including http://www.gingerjolie.net/ginger-jolie-biography here, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1422951/bio here, http://tf.org/person/630 here, http://www.modfxmodels.com/FeaturedModels/fm-GingerJolie.html here (plus an inteview from her, and plenty of lesser bios like http://www.babes.net/detail.asp?name=Ginger+Jolie here, http://www.blissbox.com/store/peoplebio.asp?peopleid=7632 here, http://www.definebabe.com/models/072/ginger-jolie/ here, http://www.neongalleries.com/310/index.html here, and her images are available from literally hundreds and hundreds of pays sites. I don't think pity delete votes is conducive to Wikipedia's interests
— User:Pharmboy, 11:44, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:PORNBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)