Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The House of Fine Art
fails /. Before even commenting here, I had already searched about the HOFA, and was unable to find any in-depth, independent, reliable coverage that comes anywhere close to meeting  or . But I am someone who believes in discussion. So I posted my analysis of every source of the article in the hope of getting others' views. But rather than providing any new material for discussion or any policy-based arguments, they have just provided the copies of ''https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/arts/mayfair-gallery-to-put-its-entire-art-collection-up-for-sale-in-cryptocurrency-a3905356.html LES'' source, which appeared in multiple cryptocurrency promoting blogs/websites. These blogs/sites aren't even counted for notability, per . In any case, they add nothing new. Every thing else has already been explained in my analysis above. And I also note the thorough policy-based analysis of Jytdog. We can waste more time here, but that won't make any difference
— User:NitinMlk, 22:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:GNG||WP:ORGCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)