Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Chadbourne
If "a considerable amount" of verifiable information is available in reliable sources such as those, why not add them to the article? Furthermore, although self-published sources can be used to verify information, they cannot be used to establish notability. I'm glad they exist to verify, but what is there to show that Mark Chadbourne is notable? You've added three links to the article: one |self-published, one written by a friend of his, and one potentially reliable and independent source. However, the reliable source shows chart listings for the song on what appears to be a relatively small TV station. Having #1 songs on that chart alone does not meet the criteria at 
— User:GorillaWarfare, 15:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SPS||WP:MUSIC (Wikipedia:Verifiability)