Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyle Stevik (3rd nomination)
This is among the weakest of keeps but two reason pushes me to favor keep. Generally, when an article is repeatedly nominated for deletion over a short period of time the nomination reeks of , I do not think this is the case here. I am very vocal of defending articles subject to repeated nominations, a lack of consensus is a sign of notability. I was unable to access 5 of those sources
— User:Gourami, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)