Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IM5
This is a weird one because there's little doubt they're about to become ''extremely'' notable (even allowing for , the people involved will surely mean coverage in reliable sources as soon as they actually release a record), but the lack of coverage now (and as it stands, their very existence isn't verifiable - it could all still turn out to be a hoax on Hilton's part, or something) means they don't meet the standard for an article right now.  It seems counterproductive to !vote delete on something that's almost certainly going to have to be recreated down the line, but the alternative can of worms seems worse
— User:Fosse8, 10:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)