Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimi Finster
Certainly it should be possible to write a |neutral article about Kimi Finster, who after all is just a fictional character. The editing dispute should be resolved in some other way besides deletion of the whole article per Bobet and Extreme Unction. Also, each person gets a maximum of one vote in an Articles for Deletion discussion; if a voter has more to say after voting, they should phrase it as a comment rather than a separate vote. Keeping this article does not mean we endorse everything written in it, just that the article is worthy of staying in Wikipedia even if editing is needed
— User:Metropolitan90, 17:49, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)