Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrimeroEdge
into Cybersoft. Ok, it exists and is in use by about 11% of school children in the U.S., but there's little in the way of independent coverage. We have 7 references in the article. The first is basically just a listing of approved packages. Not particularly revealing. The second is a press release from the company itself, thus a |primary source, not what we |really need. The third is virtually identical to the first. The fourth and fifth references are the same article from two different news outlets. I.e., it's really just one reference to a |secondary source. Ok, that's one. The sixth isn't a secondary source; it's a customer. The seventh is, once again, a press release, thus a |primary source. So in the shake out of all this we have.... ONE, reliable |secondary source. That's precious little to support a stand alone article. Recommend to merge useful content back to Cybersoft and leave this as a redirect to same
— User:Hammersoft, 14:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:SECONDARY||WP:SECONDARY||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:No original research)