Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.K. Firos
Subject has not held any role that would confer an automatic presumption of notability just because he exists, and the article is still referenced to a mixture of |primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, with short blurbs and glancing namechecks of his existence within articles that aren't ''about him'' for the purposes of getting him over , which is not the kind of sourcing we're looking for. GNG is ''not'' just "count the number of webpages that can be found with his name in them, and keep him if he surpasses an arbitrary number" — it tests sources for their type, their depth, their geographic range and the ''context'' of what they're covering the person ''for'', and ''not'' every possible "source" is necessarily always a ''notability-building'' source
— User:Bearcat, 00:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)