Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toronto rapid transit signals
No general reader would be interested''" is probably true of the vast majority of our articles, and a dubious argument against deletion.  (It's a sort of privileged ''I-believe-it's-unimportant-so-everyone-must-believe-the-same-thing'' variation on the theme of .)  There's presumably a small but active Toronto railfan community &ndash; as there is in any major city &ndash; who actually find this sort of thing ''quite'' interesting, thank you very much.Merging wouldn't make sense, as the diagrams and images which convey the useful central information in this article &ndash; the photos of signals and diagrams of the different signal indications &ndash; would take up a rather overwhelming amount of space in the already-beefy Toronto rapid transit article.  Indeed, this is a textbook case of a situation where a detailed |sub-article is appropriately used to provide detail that isn't necessary in the associated main article.(It's also worth comparing with Automation of the New York City Subway to get an idea of where a sub-article like this could evolve in the future
— User:TenOfAllTrades, 15:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:SUBARTICLE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)