Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kludgeocracy
First, the neologism itself doesn't seem to be sufficiently widespread. I'd expect to see a lot more than a few blog entries and news articles that '''quote the author'''. A neologism has to have a life of its own. Second, the author is not sufficiently notable, so there is no redirect target. Because that would be perfect. Perhaps this is a case of , and the author will become notable and get his own article and then this will be a redirect to a section that discusses his successfully published work and everyone will win. Not right now
— User:FreeRangeFrog, 02:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)