Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freopedia
I still fail to see any reason for  - too many afds like this from ,low edit possibly  are given credit by well meaning misinterpreters of the AGF principle.  I say even just one clue to the nominators nomination text of the slightest  negative bias should see the nomination thrown out, regardless of the veracity of the actual intent of the nomination. I still stand by the checkuser suggestion, and a closer watch on eds who think 2 edits with knowledge of the issues as shown in the nomination be '''not''' assumed good faith. Where has the knowledge about notability come from?  The responses above are basically feeding a Troll - and I thought in the old days we didnt do that
— User:SatuSuro, 01:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)