Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruenor Battlehammer
What this boils down to is that you might benefit greatly from understanding the difference between  and .  There IS a difference; one of which is that the latter is an actual policy on this site.  In terms of the content of these two elements of our discussion (as I said in my previous chat with you about these matters) it's one thing to say, "Keep simply because article X exists," and quite another to say, "Keep, because the ''reasons'' article X was kept are also applicable here."  If you think that the pages I referenced were all - or mostly - retained through "no consensus" rather than "keep," then this points out the need for two things: a) Take an actual look at the pages I cite; you'll see a fair bit of straight keeps, and those that fall to "no consensus" do so only because of the tiny cadre of editors who ''always, invariably'' vote "delete" on this kind of material. b) If you aren't ''aware'' of the consensus for some bizzare reason, this might explain why you're so doggedly plowing through your
— User:Mikeblas, 13:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WAX||WP:CONSENSUS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)