Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GH avisualagency™
as while GHava is a business, they are also a legitimate artist collective whose work (individually and as a group) is widely recognized beyond their commercial output - Art_gallery|gallery shows (most recently at the 222 Gallery in Philadelphia, books and Art_magazines|art magazines, etc.  I would argue that GH deserve a Wikipedia article on that basis, and should be considered not just on the grounds of  but in the more general ideas of otability, erifiability, mportance
— User:Dwdaniell, 20:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:N||WP:V||WP:I (Wikipedia:Notability)