Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domenic Johansson custody case
Regardless of how important the homeschooling organizations make this case seem, there are virtually no objective, reliable sources that satisfy Wikipedia's guidelines. Please recall that Wikipedia is not a soapbox (). An article should not be used as a way of advocating a point. If charges of racism have been made, if this really is a case that is sparking a discussion about homeschooling rights and the role of the state in family life, then there should be reliable sources that discuss the issue and how it has sparked this discussion. But there are not. The only sources available are either (1) opinion pieces from non-neutral organizations, or (2) court filings by the parents. Neither of theses may be accepted as RS. If in the future there arises sufficient objective evidence, I would be very pleased to see the article recreated. Until then, however, the criteria for keeping an article are simply not met. Special:Contributions/68.0.215.230|68.0.215.230
— [[User talk:68.0.215.230|talk]]), 23:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)