Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rehak
First let me thank you for such a lively debate. I haven't been this intellectually challenged and stimulated in awhile. I've checked into it and registration of ISBNs indicates that these are indeed 4 different and separate publishing companies, so they cannot be publishing through each other. And of the 4, only Lulu offers self-publishing, which means that the author can pay for a distribution service. But you're right that there's no need to get caught up on that. In my humble opinion, although I haven't bothered with hunting down the articles and links and citations, based on web searches and offline sources I remember reading, I come to the belief that the information is sourced and it meets . I understand you feel differently, and that's fine, I fully respect and understand, and we can agree to respectfully not agree. On a purely subjective note, I must say I have really enjoyed this author's books and it would be for me a big pity to see this interesting article deleted and removed, as I would be interested in seeing it change and expand as the author's career progresses. With that concern in mind, I of course leave it up to wiki administration to make the final call.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Verywords51, 16:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)