Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Sullivan (technologist) (2nd nomination)
The provided sources are overwhelmingly just news articles quoting something Sullivan said or are primary sources. It comes across as a very concerted effort to appear notable without actually being so. Sullivan does not appear to meet any of the guidelines in . If Sullivan has done something notable that is of lasting historical impact in his field, I can see him being notable, but I am not seeing any evidence of this in his article or the sources provided
— User:217IP, 02:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)