Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrysler LA engine
This AfD nomination makes little sense. Those few Wikipedia articles that approach perfection get nominated for Featured Article status. We don't delete the ones that fall short of the mark, we work coöperatively and steadily to improve them incrementally. Chrysler LA engine needs work — |reliable sources would be a good start. However, it's not "messy" by any reasonable definition; its assertions and subtopics are arranged logically and coherently, its lengthy lists are neatly hidden behind hide-tabs pending consensus on whether the lists should be there or not, and it is currently under active development by more than one editor. There seems no valid reason to delete this article unless we also decide to delete Ford FE engine, Chrysler Slant-6 engine, Ford Windsor engine, and numerous other articles about vehicle engines that are in need of — and undergoing — active development. I would suggest the nominator http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Prahladananda_Swami&diff=prev&oldid=192661201 adhere to his/her own advice regarding Wikifying rather than deleting articles
— User:Scheinwerfermann, 22:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)