Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Foundation Day
Looking at the above material, I think an article about the anniversary could be warranted. But I think the problem is that the current article is trying to portray the anniversary as something it isn't, namely an established commemorative occasion with a proper name. The title "Hong Kong Foundation Day" was selected arbitrarily by the article's author. None of the above sources uses it. The Chinese etymological sections are absolutely not necessary. Why is it not enough to explain that ''hoi'' means "open"? Why is it necessary to describe the historical development of the Chinese character? I don't get it. Same with the bit about the definition of the word "foundation". Finally, if the article stays it needs to be stripped of the huge amount of , including . Please review Wikipedia:Citing sources. The claims in the article should be directly verifiable using the reliable sources cited. Editors should not add their own interpretation, speculation, and commentary to the encyclopedia. Thank you
— User:Citobun, 08:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTHESIS (Wikipedia:No original research)