Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batuque (documentary)
It would have been better if you actually linked to websites instead of a google search, which we already know how to do.  What I did find in those google searches was a lot of blog entries and a couple of dead 404 pages.  Personally, references in foreign languages don't bother me, as Chrome offers to translate on the fly making it very easy to |verify.  The problem is I don't see reference-able material in |reliable sources. As for the IDFA http://www.idfa.nl/industry/tags/project.aspx?id=cca5cd7b-3aad-4335-b458-d596105d9161 they didn't have much to say about it, just a synopsis. I would be happy to actually look at any RS articles on the documentary if someone can point to a couple.  The COI issues are disturbing, but don't disqualify the article.  A lack of significant coverage by reliable sources does, however
— User:Dennis, 17:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)