Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs whose title includes a phone number (3rd nomination)
his argument in the last AFD is quite uncompelling. He cites Wikipedia:Lists_%28stand-alone_lists%29#Appropriate_topics_for_lists|a guideline for lists but his cited guideline states that the creator (and by extension, the defenders) of a list must be prepared to explain why the list contributes to the state of human knowledge. I don't see any such explanation in any of the AFDs of this article. He goes on to cite a slew of Template:Lists of US Presidents and Vice Presidents|lists about presidents of the United States to justify this list.  is not a compelling argument. Each article must pass policies and guidelines on its own regardless of the existence of any other article. Even if one were to ignore that flaw in his argument, since the last AFD of this article a number of those lists have been deleted, so that particular reed has grown rather slenderer. Finally he states that it is possible that someone might be interested in this information. We delete articles every day that people are interested in, because they don't meet policies or guidelines. That somethign is interesting is not automatic grounds for its inclusion in Wikipedia. Uncle G's arguments are weak, they do not address the objections to this list raised in the nomination, and opinions |relying on them should be discounted
— User:Otto4711, 19:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:PERNOM (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)