Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulau Saigon
I've used the sources provided by {{u|Lemongirl942}} to expand the article a bit more. Sources there before my edit clearly established the economic and archaeological history of the site, beyond the requirements of . and my changes only reinforce it. Given this, there is little reason this should be open for a full week. My suggestion to the nominator is to avoid AfDs and work on their own content for the time being
— User:Patar, 15:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GEOLAND (Wikipedia:Notability)