Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Jaaska
Let's look at the facts.  This article was nominated for deletion three hours after it was created.  Do people need pointing at  or even our |editing policy? Let's practise what we preach here and allow the collaborative nature of Wikipedia to work its charms.  I have a stack of Comics Journals sitting here, but it's going to take me longer than the time this afd has left to run to find the articles that exist and build a better article than we currently have. The sources likely exist.  That's all we need to know.  If they haven't been found in six months or so, we can revisit it.  There's no hurry here.  I'd also advise the nominator that we do not speedy articles for lack of assertion of notability, and that the correct speedy clause is '''An article about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.'''  Being a published artist is of no small significance, but I guess that's all subjective. Stubs used to be allowed to exist on Wikipedia, I don;t recall the memo that that had changed. Someone want to post it to me
— User:Hiding, 23:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BITE||WP:EP (Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers)