Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Himalayan Times
According to https://www.worldcat.org/title/himalayan-times/oclc/848243742?referer=di&ht=edition WorldCat, ''The Himalayan Times'' is held by over 500 libraries. A Google search in Nepali language|Nepali also reveals that reports from ''The Himalayan Times'' are cited in other major newspapers, e.g., the Hindustan (newspaper)|''Hindustan'' (https://www.livehindustan.com/international/story-tribhuvan-international-airport-in-nepal-lack-of-electricity-2954902.html), ''Punjab Kesari'' (https://www.punjabkesari.in/national/news/nepal-8-tourists-from-kerala-found-dead-in-hotel-room-1114329https://punjabkesari.com/world-news/7-people-still-missing-avalanche-in-nepal/), and ''Rajasthan Patrika'' (https://www.patrika.com/body-soul/coronavirus-coronavirus-in-nepal-5717189/). This seems sufficient to pass criterion 4 of #Newspapers, magazines and journals. FWIW, ''The Himalayan Times'' is also cited frequently on Wikipedia—just take a look at Special:WhatLinksHere/The Himalayan Times|its incoming links. Even if this article is never as extensive as our articles on ''The New York Times'' or ''The Washington Post'', deleting it would be a disservice to our readers who want to find out some basic info about the newspaper, such as its city of publication or year of establishment. For a newspaper the size of ''The Himalayan Times'', I think it's likely that a few Nepalese sources could be found that describe the paper's history or impact. If a through  in Nepalese sources turns up no independent coverage of the paper whatsoever, I'd be willing to reconsider my !vote; however, I think that the paper's impact, as demonstrated by the library holdings and citations in other sources, is enough to presume notability per 
— User:Lord, 15:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NMEDIA||WP:BEFORE||WP:NMEDIA (Wikipedia:Notability)