Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooklands photo archive
Although I recognise the poor 3rd part citation and the issue with , we ought to fix that by tagging the problem and editing, not by summary deletion. The history of Brooklands is highly notable, this archive documents that history. There is no issue here with , and even little in respect of , unless you fancy a sophist circular argument about 1st party sources
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)