Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cancelled Sega Genesis games
Well-sourced" repeated ''three times'' above: Are you impressed by the Wikipedia:Bombardment|300 sources? Because every ref I check here does not verify the basis for the article, that the game was canceled. This list is a collection of times a source has mentioned a game for a platform, not giving any indication of cancellation. Stuff like "Only a single screenshot exists.88 Showcased at E3 1995.38" is patent |original research. Whoever wrote this could ''only find'' one screenshot. We know nothing about what definitively "exists" because as a tertiary source encyclopedia we depend on secondary sources to vet claims for us. Without reliable sourcing that covers canceled games on the basis that canceled games are worth discussing as a group, the article will sit and collect more of these unfounded claims. And that's before even getting to all of the unreliable sources cited here just to build up the rows: Unseen64, Hidden Palace, Segabits, individual resumes, come on... And that's before checking the dead links. From every row I check, I'm struggling to see this as anything but an egregious violation of "no original research", a core Wikipedia policy
— [[User talk:Czar|czar]], 06:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)