Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Hunter-Clarke (3rd nomination)
I'm certainly not seeing genuinely ''compelling'' evidence of notability, and would most likely have voted to delete if I'd participated in the February discussion at all — but what I'm not seeing presented ''here'' is any ''new'' evidence of non-notability that wasn't already taken into account in February. I don't always agree with where consensus lands either, but my responsibility as a Wikipedian is to abide by consensus whether I agree with it or not, and to present a much more thoroughly reasoned case for reconsideration if I feel strongly enough to shoot for a |consensus can change test (which I have to admit that I don't here.) So if there were a ''compelling'' new reason to reopen this just three months after a clear keep, then I'd be willing to hear it out — but if we're just going to rehash the same arguments as last time with nothing new being brought to the table, then we should wait for at least three more months before trying
— User:Bearcat, 00:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CCC (Wikipedia:Consensus)