Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESPN College Football on ABC results
I'm a little less convinced on this one, but I don't like how the nominator neglected to explain in his nomination statement how this article violates . It is the nominator's job to do the legwork in gathering evidence to demonstrate why the article should be deleted. He did not do that. How are we supposed to evaluate the nom's argument if all we are given is "Per ". Per what part of ? How does that part apply? Also, I am not impressed by the nom's effort to silence a keep !voter, especially since the !voter in question, unlike the nom, had the courtesy to do more than merely link a policy and make a vague claim
— User:Lepricavark, 14:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)