Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tessa Majors
per , specifically clause 4 (emphasis mine): 'Routine kinds of news events (including ''most crimes, accidents, deaths'', celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – ''whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance''.' There is nothing currently about this story that gives it enduring significance. That it's been widely reported on is not relevant; a crime making the news does not confer inherent notability. There has to be something more. Something like the Lindbergh kidnapping makes the cut, not just because of who was kidnapped and the amount of books and material written about the case, but because the results of the act caused kidnapping to become a Federal offense. The disappearance and murder of Amber Hagerman, which was a motivation behind the creation of the Amber alert, doesn't even have her own article; it's a subsection of the Amber alert article. Currently there's nothing to indicate that this specific death even rises to the level of Hagerman's death. It's making the news cycle but . If that changes, the article can be restored, with proper emphasis on what about this event gave it enduring significance
— User:Mr, 18:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Notability)