Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positive friendships between men and boys in literature and film
First off, you seem to be forgetting that Wikipedia is not here to prove any point, or bring awareness to any factor of any issue. A  argument for keep is not acceptable under any circumstances. Your ranting assertion about how I am "oblivious to the revilement of males as inherent sexual predators against young boys that has developed in western societies during the post WW2 period, conspicuously fronted by radical feminism" is not a reason that this article should be kept per Wikipedia's policy. In fact, the idea that this article should stay to counteract any other idea is in direct opposition to Wikipedia's policy of |a neutral point of view. Articles do not, or at least should not, exist to prove any point. They exist to be an encyclopedic resource recounting the facts about a subject as |verified in |reliable, published sources. And as no reliable sources directly cover "positive relationships between men and boys in film and literature", the topic as covered in the article is |synthesis original research. By self-referential material, I meant the extensive phrases in which the article talks about itself. Phrases revolving around "This article is/is not..." are not encyclopedic content
— User:VanTucky, 19:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)