Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core-and-pod (2nd nomination)
The OP presents a long list of rationales that are all not Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Reasons for deletion|valid reasons to delete.  Being an orphan is not grounds for deletion (). Being a stub is not grounds for deletion ().  Being poorly referenced is not grounds for deletion (unreferenced is not the same as unverifiable ). Being arcane, technical, or narrow, is not grounds for deletion, indeed, it is the mission of Wikipedia to gather all human information.  Not being worked on (, and ) is not grounds for deletion.  Being poorly written is not grounds for deletion (}.  Having few pageviews is not grounds for deletion ().  It's almost like you are trying to go for a full house on arguments to avoid at AfD
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORPHS||WP:TOOLITTLE||WP:UNRS||WP:NOTIMELIMIT||WP:NOIMPROVEMENT||WP:IMPATIENT||WP:RUBBISH||WP:NOBODYREADSIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)