Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Brahmin Gotras
as complement to category per  and as navigational list of articles per . It ''should'' be obvious that "unsourced" is not a deletion argument; what matters is whether the information is verifiable, and the nominator implicitly concedes that it is. We also must consider the potential of an article per  and , not its current state, and the list obviously ''can'' be sourced, not to mention annotated and otherwise expanded. So let's not see any more wasteful and counterpolicy nominations like this
— User:Postdlf, 13:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDUP||WP:CLN||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates)