Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1901 Census of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh
but not because the data is wrong (we have many articles about ideas that were once thought correct but are simply wrong). Rather, because . It is reasonable to discuss major national censuses. This isn't; it's one regional component of the 1901 Census of India. By comparison, we have an article about the 2010 United States Census, but I don't think anyone would seriously argue in favor of by-state sub-articles that serve only as stat-table dumping grounds (2010 Texas Census is thankfully red). I wouldn't entirely be opposed to individual articles, such as 1901 Census of India (currently a redirect) on the pre-Independence Indian censuses, citing the aggregate "data" as well as the |reliable modern sources that explain why those numbers are untrustworthy (at best). But that still doesn't justify regional articles like this one
— User:Squeamish, 15:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTSTATSBOOK||WP:RS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)