Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capricon
Seems to barely meet , primarily because of tenure. It is a bit "listy," though, and verifiable sources are pretty thin. I don't have really strong feelings one way or another about this one, frankly
— User:Realkyhick, 20:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)