Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Setjetting
I was ready to recommend deleting this as a non notable |neologism, but my search shows that it has been discussed enough in reliable sources that I conclude it passes the threshold into notability. Here are examples: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2005/aug/09/news.travelnews 'Set-jetters' boost tourism, http://www.onecaribbean.org/content/files/SetJetting.pdf Set Jetting, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23130378/ns/travel-destination_travel/t/set-jetting-fabulous-film-locations/#.UB7vx01lT8k Set jetting 2008 — fabulous film locations, http://www.newzealand.com/travel/media/features/film&television/film_set-jetting-around-new-zealand_feature.cfm Set jetting around New Zealand locations, http://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/20/elsewhere-frightseeing-palidays-and-set-jetting/ Elsewhere: Frightseeing, Palidays and Set-Jetting, and http://www.tourism-review.com/travel-tourism-magazine-set-jetting-to-the-islands-of-the-bahamas-article804 SET-JETTING TO THE ISLANDS OF THE BAHAMAS. The topic is narrower than Pop-culture tourism as a tour of Beatles-related sites in Liverpool would not be considered setjetting
— User:Cullen328, 22:27, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEOLOGISM (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)