Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black the Ripper
I would suggest that JoyRider reads  to see why those are not considered reliable independent sources. Also, I would point out to them that merely showing that something exists is not showing that it has significance or notability. If grimepedia were really a wiki, it would be rejected. As a pay site, it is also rejected. The forum part is also rejected. YouTube merely shows that someone exists. Amazon too is merely establishing existence - they will list almost anything. What we are after is totally independent sources that show that the subject is of note. The article claims various things. We need verifiable proof () in the reliable independent sources I referred to. I agree with FisherQueen that there are claims to significance. But I don't feel they are proven
— User:Peridon, 12:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)