Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirits of the Jaguar (2nd nomination)
per  and  . Most notable ever? Nope. But notable enough through coverage and commentary in suitable independent reliable sources? Yes. Sorry, but not using available sources of commentary and review does not mean automatically non-notable... it means the project benefits from work not deletion. http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/24688/bbc-atlas-of-the-natural-world-western-hemisphere-and-antarctica/, https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Spirits%20of%20the%20Jaguar%22%2C%20BBC&oq=%22Spirits%20of%20the%20Jaguar%22%2C%20BBC&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.7056j0j4
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 06:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NRVE||WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Notability)