Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek 2 (2013 film)
This is ridiculous. We've had this tango twice before. ''The Lone Ranger'' i understood because it got shelved soon afterward. This is a well-sourced and well-discussed film. There is a filming date cited in the article, which is in two months. There is a bounty of sources that confirm this film is happening. You constantly cite . That is for films that are announced and hasn't got alot of news stories that aid in it's notability. If i created this article when it was first announced for release in 2012, yea, i would have understood why you would redirect it. But now, they've begun casting rumours, they're scouting locations, and there are new stories on the film each day. I spent two hours digging deep through clusters of stories about this project, so this meets . It's notable. Just look at sources like this http://www.filmjunk.com/2011/11/24/star-trek-sequel-gets-a-new-release-date-3d-confirmed/, now why would they be announcing what format of filming they would use if there was a slight possibility this wouldn't happen
— [[User: Rusted AutoParts|Rusted AutoParts]]'' ([[User talk:Rusted AutoParts|talk]]) 15:48 24 November 2011 (UTC), NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)