Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Main (2nd nomination)
The player fails the guidelines at  and , set up to deal with exactly this type of situation. He may be the leagues top scorer this season, but so has a player every season and that doesn't infer notably. It is very questionable whether he passes  and  as there is a lack of reliable secondary sources for Jon listed in the article. The references provided either do not have him as the subject http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/fa_cup/7704913.stm 1 or are unreliable http://www.kentishfootball.co.uk/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2525&Itemid=38 2. Arguments such as page view statistics, he deserves it and users trying hard are redundant as per Wikipedia policy. The discussion is to determine whether he is notable for this encyclopedia, and the moment, he is not. If he passes the notablity stage in the future, the article can be recreated in it's current state, saving all the current work that has gone into it
— User:Eastlygod, 16:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATHLETE||WP:FOOTYN||WP:BIO||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)