Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proton pack (2nd nomination)
Editors do not need a calculator or ouija board to be able to compare the busy edit historyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proton_pack&limit=500&action=history of this article to some of the other Special:Statistics|{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} en.Wikipedia articles that might have only one or two edits over similar years-long periods. Simply put, editors can look and compare for themselves to see that contributing editors ARE concerned with this article's topic. And "arguably notable" is a reference to those "arguments" being made here toward notability AND Talk:Proton pack#Sources|an offered search which finds the topic as having become part of enduring cinematic history... even leaking over into popular culture. And with respects to those who have opined a delete based upon |current sourcing, that so many available sources have not been used does not mean we automatically delete a notable topic because of that lack, as |notability is dependent upon sources toward a topic being available... and NOT upon their immediate use as citations. The concerns listed in your nomination statement all look to be addressable issues with format and style... issues that can be addressed through regular editiing and do not require deletion. For such issues, we have |means of correction other than deletion
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 22:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UGLY||WP:NRVE||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)