Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity and violence (2nd nomination)
The arguments for deletion are just plain false. Nominator falsely states that only the title of the page has been changed since the previous AfD discussion. In fact, the edit history will show that the page has been considerably improved in the intervening time. As the editor just above me notes, the reason for the relative lengths of the sections reflects the existence of a separate pacifism page. The second editor arguing for deletion is essentially making a  argument. If there are still concerns about the tone of the page, the correct action to take is to edit it for NPOV, not to delete it. Nowhere has anyone even attempted to argue that the page fails  or lacks sourcing. In fact, since the previous AfD, secondary sources establishing a literature on the consistent link between Christianity and violence have been added to the page, obviating previous concerns about a coatrack. I also have to note that this nomination has appeared, over the Easter weekend, simultaneously with a sudden flurry of arguments for page deletion placed, incorrectly, on the article talk page instead of here, after months of quiet since the previous AfD discussion. Therefore, I cannot help but to suspect that there has been off-site canvassing to promote this AfD
— User:Tryptofish, 19:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:N (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)