Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of languages by number of words
This is at best a |synthesis of not-totally-comparable data. It's vanishingly unlikely that, say, Duden and Shogakukan will have the same standards for what counts as a headword. Apparently the Svenska Akademien has only completed A-T, so there's obvious incommensurability among the dictionaries. Furthermore, any such list necessarily privileges the selected dictionaries' definitions of "word" above other, equally valid possible definitions and possible counts. The selection category is words "included in the dictionary considered the most authoritative or complete", but considered by whom? the Wikipedian who added that line to the chart? I don't see how this can be anything other than original research
— User:Cnilep, 02:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)