Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Tia Sharp
I think discussions of this sort are inherently subjective: developing events like this often won't satisfy  or , but there's little point in deleting them if it's clear they soon will. In this case I think 146.90.141.14's logic is sound: it's hard to see the story dying down anytime soon, so coverage will go beyond a short news cycle (as required by ). I could be wrong though. &ndash;&nbsp
— User:Arms, 03:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT||WP:PERSISTENCE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)