Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olde Boston Bulldogge
In my opinion, I do not accept anything printed by newspaper or magazine journalists as reliable. These either have no expertise on the subject or they can misinterpret what an expert has told them because they do not understand the basics of the subject. Regarding the two books, Gingold is a freelance writer, has no expertise in the subject, and the text quoted appears to be promoting a farm that breeds this dog for sale by marketing it as being special. However, Harris appears to be an expert, the book has 4 editors to maintain its quality, and of interest it refers to https://ioeba.net/ IOEBA. The subject currently has one potential reliable source; it is up to editors to decide if this source meets the "published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" criterion. If it is decided that this book does meet this criteria, then all that we have established is that this cross-breed exists; there still remains the issue of  material that could be used to create an encyclopedic article, as we do not have 
— User:William, 22:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RELIABLE||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)