Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André Diedericks
First let me remind interested editors in the subject of this article of  & . Please do not make comments about fellow editors, and |assume good faith. Attacking fellow editors does nothing to advance the shared purpose of improving this project/Wikipedia. That being said, I have not come across any |significant coverage of the subject in |tertiary sources provided in the article (which as mentioned above has been edited multiple times since this AfD began), to indicate that the subject meets . As mentioned by other editors, since the highest medal for valour in South Africa during the subjects service period was divided into multiple grades, and as the subject was never awarded the highest of those grades, or the second highest of those grades multiple times, medals alone are insufficient for the subject to pass notability per . Now the only reason why I am not saying strait delete, but weak delete, is because of |the non-english language tertiary sources that might exist that give significant coverage of the subject. However, as I have not seen any presented that are readily available to other editors, I cannot support keeping this article at this time
— User:RightCowLeftCoast, 20:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CIVIL||WP:NPA||WP:AGF||WP:SIGCOV||WP:PSTS||WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER||WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Civility)