Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of populist parties
I can't really see any value to this article. It admits itself that the term 'populist' is difficult to define, and the cites it has chiefly appear to be merely descriptions of a politician or party as being 'populist', in a way that practically any successful politician or party could be described.  They don't really qualify as ''defining'' a party as 'populist'.  Aside for that, the majority of the article is waffly and .  The sentence "''finding populist parties is a hard work, because we have to distinguish the connotations (both positive and negative) of populism and look for real trademarks of the populist ideology/political philosophy''" is practically an up-front admission of original research in action
— User:Escape_Orbit, 22:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)