Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pteronophillia
Quoting from the article itself: "Closing- All of this work has been done based off of nonfactual evidence, as no actual scientific evidence or novels of any sort exist documenting ,at the moment, such a fetish. All of the notation has been done by a pteronophilliac with the aid of a physchology major and a masters thesis on fetishes".  Fetish articles, in WP and online, are rife with |protologistic constructions from |arbitrary Greek or Latinate roots.  This is no exception
— User:Serpent, 03:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:NFT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)