Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientific dissent (2nd nomination)
Presently the article discusses several specific authors' views on dissent in science, and I think the politicization article is more appropriate where politics are involved. Galileo and Lysenko are almost straw-men here, as they often are; Galileo was right and dissented, and Lysenko was wrong and dissent was suppressed. Those incidents are in the pre-modern scientific era, and they should not be used to suggest that there is some merit in dissent from things that are presently well-established. I'm opposed to keeping the article based on  as well, because I think that dissent is not a concept applicable to the scientific method. Science can be politicized and it can be wrong, but one cannot dissent from the scientific consensus ''for a non-scientific reason'' and call that dissent "science
— User:Roches, 06:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)