Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (4th nomination)
A |battleground article pure-and-simple that tries to pigeonhole people into an "opposition" category that is only defined by what it is not. Would it be appropriate to have an article on List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of gravity or List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of evolution or List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of electromagnetism or List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of meteorology? That there is a media-hyped controversy over the broader topic of global warming is fact that is addressed well elsewhere. That there exist ostensible "scientists" who have various opinions on the matter is not surprising. That Wikipedia is trying to determine who does and does not fit such a characteristic is well-beyond the capabilities of the amateur hour that passes for editorial guidance here. Special:Contributions/69.86.225.27|69.86.225.27
— [[User talk:69.86.225.27|talk]]), 03:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BATTLE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)