Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of firsts
omg kill it before it multiplies! This list is infinite, and if DGG's criteria is "if it has a wikipedia article" that does very little to threaten my argument. This list is so incredibly unmanageable, it would be of no use to anyone, and rife for problems of a number of kinds.One possible exception: a meta-list of wikipedia "First" articles. For example, it could have things like "List of first Oregonian Americans to..." or "List of first Mongolians to..." "List of first people to summit a mountain...". That might be a ''manageable'' article, but the fact I can come up with this many topics off the top of my head should only reinforce the point that this list is absolutely endless.Finally, I don't think the meta-list, as reasonable as it ''could be'', is advisable, since the same goal is accomplished much more efficiently through ategory|categories
— User:Shadowjams, 10:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:C (Wikipedia:Copyrights)