Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidden-measurements interpretation
The nomination does not advance a deletion rationale based on Wikipedia policy, but that said, the topic is not |notable by our standards. All the sources in the article are primary (by Aerts or his co-authors). The same goes for the citations to the paper that supposedly introduced the idea: they are by Aerts, by people who repeatedly co-authored with him, or passing mentions. One of those co-authors actually https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.02869 called the idea "overlooked". This interpretation doesn't even make the list when https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1069 physicists are surveyed about their favorites. When an interpretation of quantum mechanics is so obscure that nobody has argued why it must be wrong, then it's ''really obscure
— User:XOR, 21:48, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)