Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deletionist versus Inclusionist Controversy
The conflict between inclusionists and deletionists on Wikipedia has received substantial coverage, properly referenced in the article, in USA Today, National Public Radio, The Telegraph, Canadian paper National Post and the Harvard Business School. This easily satisfies  and . This is not original research and it is not a metadiscussion among editors. The fact that somewheere on Wikipedia editors discuss something has no bearing on whether a referenced article about the subject is also appropriate.  This short article probably in the top 25% of Wikipedia articles in terms of having multiple independent and reliable references with substantial coverge. We needn't attempt to hide disputes within the Wikipedia comunity from public scrutiny, when they are widely covered in the world's newspapers and broadcast media. It clearly is not a candidate for merger to a "Criticisms of Wikipedia" article or section, since the references and the text do not single out either philosophy as deficient. This could be a section in the main article, so separately from this AFD there could be a merger proposal
— User:Edison, 18:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)