Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternoster Press
Happily, I ''do'' have access to the ''Irish Times'', and I am at a loss to figure how anyone claiming familiarity with the provisions of the GNG could possibly claim that this casual one-sentence namedrop meets the requirements for "significant coverage," since it most bloody explicitly does not.  I am likewise at a loss as to how anyone could think that  applies to a publishing house.  Publishing houses are not authors, and I wonder what other entities E.M.Gregory would care to unilaterally rewrite (or invent wholecloth) extant notability criteria to cover where notable books are concerned.  The shipping companies?  The bookstores that sell them?  Banks that handle the financing?As far as E.M.Gregory's question uptopic, I'd like to turn that around: why are you so intent on ''keeping'' this article that you're willing to rewrite or ignore the criteria upon which we make such decisions? SL93 is exactly right: AfD is not the proper venue to legislate notability criteria, and we must determine the notability of subjects based on the criteria that are in place.  If you want to change those criteria, the appropriate talk pages are where you do it
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']], 10:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)