Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward W. Gosselin
the nominator's rationale seems malformed in that I have no idea how a subject can "fail"  (which of cse isn't a rule and is ''inclusive'' not ''exclusive''), regardless I cannot see that this poor bloke has enough coverage to meet the requirements of . Consensus seems to be that DANFS isn't enough (although I've been the dissenting opinion on that one before). Merge to the article on the ship that was named in his honour
— User:Anotherclown, 09:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)