Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sucden
I like to assume good faith, but I can't believe that the nominator made |any effort whatsoever to check for sources. When I removed the prod tag from this I pointed out that thousands of reliable sources are available from http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=Sucden&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=pn Google News archive and http://books.google.co.uk/books?q=Sucden&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp Google Books searches. If the nominator is concerned about references not being in the article the answer is to add some of these, not to nominate the article for deletion
— User:Phil, 18:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)