Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praxis effect
or '''merge''': ''https://www.google.de/books/edition/Les_images_de_synth%C3%A8se_au_cin%C3%A9ma/3momDwAAQBAJ?hl=de&gbpv=0 Les images de synthèse au cinéma does'' contain the ''name'' of the effect, so I think this should lay |neologism concerns to rest, even though I have to say that this source is from 2017, so the Wikipedia article predates that book. It is by Armand Colin, which seem legitimate enough to me. The treatment there is quite short, but I think it tells who created the effect and coined the term! (But I am not firm enough to understand completely, maybe someone has the time to type into Google translator). tells us where the effect comes from (film and company), where the name comes from, that it was influential. So if this together is seen as too short for , I have no great aversion to a merge - though I wouldn't know where. But I think this should ''not'' be deleted, as the ''effect'' seems legitimate according to the source already in the article, no matter the concerns about the ''name''. In addition I have found https://www.cbr.com/star-trek-hidden-secret-easter-eggs/ this CBR article, which has a paragraph on the effect. Now I am fuzzy again on the reliability of CBR. If it counts, we should have no problem with  any more
— User:Daranios, 17:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)