Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eunice Penix
To Tupelo's comment, if a local politician has significant coverage, they meet "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage" per .  How are the nine separate references I have outlined in addition to the three or more that Niteshift deleted not significant?  I would consider "Mayor Pro-Tem" a major local political figure.  Reference 18 shown above gives a significant biography of Penix.  Also, do we really want to crowd the Dade City, FL article with information about Penix?  Additionally, there is no reason under the ten points of #DELETE for this redirect to be deleted (if I am mistaken, please advise).Also, the NOTIFICATION above has been deleted twice ''by a user involved in this discussion''.  If an uninvolved admin thinks it should be deleted, then and only then should we be obscuring comments like this that may be relevant to the discussion
— User:Jax, 22:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POLITICIAN||WP:RFD (Wikipedia:Notability)