Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious terrorism
per .  While the article in its present state may not evidence notability, ''notability is a property of a topic, not an article draft,'' and the subject of religous terrorism is one which receives specific coverage in reliable sources.  http://books.google.com/books?id=swJkERVd80cC&pg=PA68&dq=which+religions+incite+terrorism&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EXD1UK3fJIP42QWepYCYAg&ved=0CEIQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=which%20religions%20incite%20terrorism&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=0fooSsaO6rMC&dq=which+religions+incite+terrorism&source=gbs_navlinks_s, http://books.google.com/books?id=V1xukwRq2cUC&dq=which+religions+terrorism&source=gbs_navlinks_s, http://books.google.com/books?id=1NgQAQAAIAAJ, http://books.google.com/books?id=WZdDbmxe_a4C&pg=PR12&dq=which+religions+terrorism&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4HD1UOK1HIbF2QXB4IDoBw&ved=0CFkQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=which%20religions%20terrorism&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=0RYbdOui4gkC&dq=which+religions+terrorism&source=gbs_navlinks_s, ....  The nominator's claim that sources (by which he or she should mean "available" sources, not sources listed at the article) on the topic are unavailable is quickly belied by a simple Gbooks search
— User:Joe, 15:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)