Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doxy.me
I understand where the editor above is coming from and I appreciate the thoroughness. It sounds like we've interpreted  differently, so I've reviewed again and my interpretation still leads me to believe these sources pass.  appears to mainly weed out anything that's essentially just a rewrite of material published by a primary source (churnalism). I dove into  as well in case I was missing something, and I'm not seeing any examples there that support the claim above. I'm not saying that interpretation is incorrect, but I haven't been able to verify this myself within the guidelines
— User:Spicypumpkin, 00:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:NIS (Wikipedia:Notability)