Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeria Lukyanova (2nd nomination)
I think "educator" is a stretch and is perhaps a bit of a misrepresentation. The vast majority of coverage (as you can see with a basic Google search) relates almost entirely to her looks and I think it's strange that the article doesn't reflect that. Why not call her a model and acknowledge her additional "spiritual" work, rather than call her an "educator" and try and play down the dozens and dozens of reliable sources that give her significant coverage for her "work" as the "human Barbie". To be clear - there's nothing wrong with an assertion of notability on the basis of her looks, in my view, especially if her looks have resulted in her receiving significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. How is that any different to any other model? She probably says it best herself - ''"I use my appearance to promote my spiritual ideas"''. There's really nothing wrong with that. But a self-promoted, 20 minute "documentary" really isn't enough to buy into the "spiritual guru" claim, especially given the apparent lack of spiritual followers. Best to frame the article in an honest, neutral way that doesn't give  weight to the few sources that discuss her spirituality over the many, many sources that give her coverage for her looks
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 09:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)