Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forum of Mathematics
Sorry, but I am not seeing widespread noteriety pertaining to this annoucement -- please see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=forum+of+mathematics&oq=forum+of+mathematics&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i400.11919.30549.0.31611.42.5.2.35.0.0.90.375.5.5.0...0.0.N_VXrvV7ekY here and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=forum+of+mathematics&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C22&as_sdtp= here. This doesn't really satisfy   (at this time). Also, I don'see how this is an intersting development more than any other Open Access journal that has been established in the last few years. Some have become notable (and worthy of inclusion) and some have not. Unfortunately, this journal has not had enough time to establish noteriety of any sort. Also, of course, the prestige of the founders and editors is not inherited by the journal itself. Also a blog post is not necessarily a  reliable source
— User:Steve, 20:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)