Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inxeption (2nd nomination)
on balance) People wanting to keep (and me!) should ensure they've signed and read .  The first three cites supported the current claims in the first sentence appear to be press releases.  ''Demery, Paul'' (currently 4th) may be a candidate for notability.  Various others lead to press releases and on some the cites are not suitably embellished with e.g. ad 'id' to lead me to the relevant part of the article.  Might be , not helped by oozing blockchain everywhere(though perhaps a good application of it), and I've not rigorously checked every reference - Burnson then Garrity might be the next best.   The summary ''Added new information on'' didn't help me understand what was new as I have not baseline.  Too hard to look further
— User:Djm, 12:13, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:THREE||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)