Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So where the bloody hell are you?
I am the article's creator). Your arguments are fairly flawed in my opinion: if it is "too short" then it needs expansion, not deletion (you did only wait less than http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=So_where_the_bloody_hell_are_you%3F&diff=45133966&oldid=45133727 two minutes after it's creation before nominating for deletion which didn't give me or other editors long in which to expand it). If it uses "profanity" then |Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors (note that bloody on it's own exists as an article). Your only argument which would stand up, if valid, is that it is not sufficiently important to merit an article. I would disagree with that since it has received http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=en&ned=uk&ie=UTF-8&q=where+the+bloody+hell+are+you&btnG=Search+News plenty of media attention recently
— User:UkPaolo, 18:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)