Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (4th nomination)
or fundamentally restructure with stronger documentation.  There are two cases which would justify an article on this topic under the guidelines.  First, the "theory" could meet verifiability (and other requirements) in and of itself.  There does not seem to be a strong sense that this is the case; the theory is known because of the author.  The argument for deletion or merger in that regard is the same that finally prevailed in the CTMU debacle.  Alternatively, an article could meet WP standards by being about the ''website'' itself, under the  requirements.  This article does not appear to meet those obligations: it is a long article focused on the content of the site (including a substantial list of claims that amounts to little more than contextless quotes).  The given references are directed towards the site's content and its creator, not towards the site in and of itself.  If there has been appropriate independant coverage of the site, cleanup and document accordingly.  If not, follow CTMU precendent and delete (or merge, if determined desirable
— User:Serpent, 04:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)