Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluxx goals (2nd nomination)
I tend to agree with the anon. I don't see why we should delete material when it isn't merged soon enough. According to the deletion policy, deletion is for harmful material or material that cannot be saved. Since this can be merged, that is not an issue. |There is also no deadline. (Incidentally, I still haven't discovered how the claim that something has to be merged promptly became part of the merge template to begin with.) Redirecting would still allow someone to merge at a later date without leaving the page lying around in the mean time. Use NOINDEX if there are concerns about its appearance on Google
— User:MacGyverMagic, 11:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:DEADLINE (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)