Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advice Polack
I accept http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FAdvice_Polack&diff=547650869&oldid=547647526 Volunteer Marek's assessment above of the 8 sources cited in the article.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Advice_Polack&diff=547660468&oldid=547650351 No one has refuted that assessment. The topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. Salt if repeatedly recreated, but I did not find any evidence of that. The meme ruined the police officer's life, but I don't think listing his name in the Wikipedia articlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Advice_Polack&diff=prev&oldid=527514130 an egregious BLP violation since it was sourced, although it was correct to remove the name per BLP. Delete per  - lack of sufficient source material. If the topic ever gets past , it still would need to get past  before there can be an article on the topic. The sourced BLP material itself does not meet , so the BLP information in the Advice Polack article should not be disbursed into other Wikipedia articles and the AfD closer should make a comment towards this
— User:Jreferee, 14:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)