Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger versus lion (2nd nomination)
The nomination is based on the shallow |argument to avoid of .  It utterly fails to address the previous nomination which took place just last year and was a clear '''Keep'''.  This is therefore a disruptive nomination per  which explains that it's "''disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.''"  The topic has a high readership and has persisted for many years.  That's because the topic is very notable and so there are numerous sources.  The topic passes  and any difficulties are just an ordinary matter of editing and dispute resolution per 
— user:Andrew, 18:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATA||WP:NOTENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:DELAFD||WP:GNG||WP:IMPERFECT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)