Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelley Webb
concerned that once again a nom is (gently?) criticised for not having carried out , although recommended they are not actually required to do so, rather the  is on the editors who add information (especially for blps) to provide |sources (but coola, what about the older articles when they didn't need them? oh:)), and to be even more pedantic doesn't  point 3 talk of a significant or well-known work having been the subject of a feature-length film not a tv series? anyway, with that rant out of the way:)) this is a '''keep''' with multiple reviews/sources, reflected now in the article, thanks to {{u|E.M.Gregory}} (also agree with them about the time it can take to 'rescue' these articles ... if only the creators included enough reliable sourcess in the first place .. sigh
— User:Coolabahapple, 15:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:BURDEN||WP:RS||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)