Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Lives Matter
or merge but there's nothing to merge.) I understand and respect the reasoning North America and Ronaz elaborate in their keep votes but I don't think this is so obviously notable. All the coverage is in relationship to BLM (so, not independently notable) and moreover, it's all from just a couple days of press, so it doesn't qualify as |sustained coverage. Knowing the SPLC is taking it seriously is some indication we may see more coverage in the future--but also maybe not. They've tracked many groups the media hasn't bothered to cover. Now, SPLC updates going forward + this initial burst of press could eventually flesh out an article but we're not there yet. AfD redirect is well in line with existing practice; and a revisiting if there's more sourcing in the future would be too
— User:Innisfree987, 14:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:SUSTAINED (Wikipedia:Notability)