Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icaria (genus)
If you apply this rationale to all valid taxa stubs, you'll find yourself swamped. There are millions of species on the planet, all of them are notable as ''all'' of them have at least one reliable reference due to the very mechanism of how taxa are named. In the future please check the validity of the taxon first in other sources before AfDing (and better yet - source them yourself). The only reasons a taxonomic article would be deleted is if it was a hoax or if it had been invalidated/synonymized by scientific consensus. Furthermore, please reread  and  and understand when and where lists are encyclopedic. Just because it's a list doesn't mean its scope is unfeasible, its content is bereft of information, or that it is unencyclopedic. Do not nominate something for deletion based solely on it being a list.--&nbsp
— User:Obsidian, 19:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:LIST (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)