Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddison Hall
the subject clearly meets , with coverage of convictions, issues facing the subject as a trans person in a male prison, suing Corrections dept. They may be trashy reasons for coverage but its there nonetheless. Ticks the box for significant coverage, reliable and independent sources. I don't agree that  applies since the media was as much about trans issues and prisoners, allocation of funds to prisoners to support their transition etc. Also the media coverage has endured right up to 2016
— User:Flat, 06:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:1E (Wikipedia:Notability)