Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HouseQuake
per easily meeting . I do not know how the nominator did not find this coverage, but  is met per http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/pl_20091031_7871.php ''National Journal'', http://voices.washingtonpost.com/reliable-source/2009/10/rs-docfilm20.html ''Washington Post'', http://www.newsobserver.com/2009/11/01/166498/filming-the-underdog.html ''News & Observer'', http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karen-elizabeth-price/revisiting-rahm_b_573432.html ''Huffington Post'', http://variety.com/2010/biz/opinion/cheer-up-to-2006-39256/ ''Variety'', http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/us/politics/22baker.html?_r=2& ''New York Times'' and many others.  I hope this lack of |due diligence was not intentional
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 01:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)