Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The US network TV schedule articles (2nd nomination)
Per , "For example, an article on a radio station should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable. These are "historically important programming lists and schedules." They are notable as shown by having multiple independent and reliable sources with significant coverage, or at least the prime time schedules are easily found to have significant coverage in books, magazines. They are a useful organizational tool with respect to the articles about the individual programs. No synthesis is needed to produce them. They are historic information, and not an "electronic program guide" someone will use to decide what to watch tonight. It is not realistic to compare a national prime time TV schedule with a weather report for one day, or with a bus schedule. I do not see how they are a "blog" as the nominator asserts, nor are they a "diary." They are not "indiscriminate."  The nominator's complaint that they  are "crufty" smacks of 
— User:Edison, 22:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)