Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Ullman (2nd nomination)
From looking for sources which might establish notability one way or another (which I had assumed would be straightforward) most of the results are articles by the subject himself promoting opinions and from what is left I don’t think it is possible to write a neutral page on this person as per  core content policies. The second aspect I assumed could establish notability definitively was the books. I am concerned by the argument above that the wikipedia page is basically a promotional source for the books, about which I wasn’t able to find any reviews aside from homeopathy-promoting websites which cannot under the circumstances be considered neutral. If the author is considered a “foremost spokesman” it should be the case that his books would have mainstream reviews in reliable sources and I am not finding any
— User:Mramoeba, 00:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)