Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fjortis (2nd nomination)
as per . Not sure the topic is sufficiently encyclopedic, more of a slang pop-culture term. Still, despite the lack of , my sense is the article is essentially correct in describing the term, since the article has been in Wikipedia for six years and has stayed in pretty much the same format and sense. Pageviews averaging 25/day, roughly, occasional spikes, so I would not be averse to keeping it either
— User:Tomwsulcer, 16:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)