Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of heads of Hong Kong by education
for much the same reasons as the Singapore article.  I have carefully read the arguments of the article creator but none of them are convincing.  The issue is not that the article lacks sources; I don't doubt that each entry on the list can be sourced and that every person on the list is notable.  The issue is that it lacks sources discussing the ''subject'' of the page – that is, the education of the heads of Hong Kong as a group.  Wikipedia totting up the alma maters of the heads and making something of it is .  Without sources on the subject, there are no viable alternatives to deletion.  It cannot be improved or merged or redirected without such a source.  This is not a subjective decision as claimed, it is based entirely on the objective existence or otherwise of such sources
— User:Spinningspark, 08:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)