Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Cleverley
Interesting concept - "famous but not notable".  That's quite a stretch.  Can we AfD Paris Hilton yet then?  (I think not.)  There is no practical limit to the number of topics that Wikipedia can cover.  |Wikipedia is not paper.  As long as the ''guidelines'' for notability are satisfied, why can't most every kid on a milk carton have an article, especially if it was nationwide?  There aren't that many total.  The "milk carton" complaint would only strike me as a problem if people were using Wikipedia to find their lost pets or runaway teens. Having an article is certainly more meaningful than a search result essentially saying ''"Nope, we have no idea who that is, but see the extensive Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Cleverley|discussion on why we're keeping our mouth shut"'', or ''"Nope, we don't know who this is, and we don't want you to tell us either (salted
— User:Reswobslc, 14:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTPAPER (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)