Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soviet occupation denialism
There seems to be some (good faith, AFAIK) misrepresentation of  in the above discussion. Articles should not be deleted on the basis of POV, as there can be instances where there is either no other point of view (try deleting water on the basis that the article only notes that it is a liquid in its natural state), or that there are no reliable third party references for the other point(s) of view. NPOV only states that articles should be written in a neutral ''style'', and that '''all''' germane references are used and ''not'' only those that support a certain position or theory. Since the language of the original title (and some of the proposed alternatives) indicates a bias, and the article presumably follows it,  then the question of NPOV does not arise
— User:LessHeard, 21:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)