Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doc Love
As I still have been unable to find significant notable coverage in reliable sources and none has been provided by other editors. That is why it should be deleted, not because it is poorly written. If consensus is that Doc Love meets , it should be kept regardless of the current state of the article, which myself and others have attempted to improve. I just don't think he's notable. I stand by my statement that {{ping|Johnpacklambert}}'s concerns about a hoax are unfounded. But  is not a reason to keep
— User:Smartyllama, 17:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ITEXISTS (Wikipedia:Notability)