Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Who's Who
I came to this article expecting a Keep but there are almost no significant RS on this publication (or site) to support .  This article has existed for over a decade, and not a single material independent RS has been added.  References quoted above like this https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/meet-the-acclaimed-canadian-author-who-couldnt-stop-lying-about-his-birthplace/ MacLean's, and this https://www.pressreader.com/canada/the-peterborough-examiner/20090808/281590941577114 Perterborough Examiner are not enough as they are not about Who's Who, but just refer to it (we are not questioning existance, but notability). This Canadian journalist's http://www.robertfulford.com/CWW.html blog is the only actual article on Canadian Who's Who but it is not acceptable for WP as an RS; it does explain why the publication was doomed, as you pay your subscription and write your own bio (the reason why it ended up in the MacLean's article above).  Media-type GNG cases should be straightforward to prove, as by definition being in the media sector, they should throw up lots of RS.  Hardly a single major Canadian newspaper or Canadian television network seems to be interested in the ''Canadian Who's Who''? This has almost nothing in terms of a GNG RS, and certainly when the requirement for "several" significant indepenent RS is added, it is a clear fail
— User:Britishfinance, 13:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)