Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horton Gallery
that references have increased in number, but are. at present, insufficient in quality. the NY Times one is a passing mention only, and the others fail . That something exists is fine, but that does not of itself, make it notable. Some sort of notability must be asserted and verified
— User:Timtrent, 11:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)