Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Person, woman, man, camera, TV
Wikipedia is not a (phrase) dictionary, especially for terms of novel conception (i.e. neologisms). Being the quotable of the day (or two) does not make it notable. Coverage generated in such a fashion is routine, just like for any top news item on any given day. I doubt anyone will |remember this in 10 years, although the general trend of Trump's mental capacities being questioned, and him bragging about his faculties, will be. The people who have found this article "useful" have only found it so because they are looking for the wrong things (news and dictionary) in Wikipedia. –&nbsp
— User:Finnusertop, 16:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Recentism)