Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark sweet
The thing is, a person can appear on shows or whatnot but that doesn't mean that those appearances or roles were overwhelmingly notable. It's fairly difficult to show notability for entertainers because there are a lot of people who will be brought in to shows (notable or otherwise) to kill time until the person everyone really came to see is brought in. It doesn't mean that the comedian isn't good or that they didn't work hard, just that these sort of things are rarely noted in news articles or made the focus of news articles or shows. The Jimmy Fallon appearance is good, but there's little other coverage out there for him. He hasn't really been the focus of in-depth news articles or other RS, he doesn't have a fan following that is so overwhelmingly large/unique that he'd get notability for that, and he isn't considered to have made any contributions that would be considered to pass part three of . In all fairness, part two and three are incredibly hard to pass without first passing part one in some way and all must have some form of coverage/reliable sourcing to back any of them up. This coverage just doesn't seem to be out there. I see trivial mentions here and there, but no in-depth coverage. The mention in http://books.google.com/books?id=7mY2GXVysX4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Top+of+the+Rock&hl=en&sa=X&ei=FYWyUJbcDebs0QGnp4CIAw&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Mark%20sweet&f=false Top of the Rock is pretty much a brief mention. It does state that he's done a lot of show warmups but I imagine that the number is probably standard for warmup comedians. The coverage just isn't out there right now. I don't have any problem with this being userfied to Melancie's userspace, though
— User:Tokyogirl79, 20:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ENTERTAINER (Wikipedia:Notability)