Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcend
Nominator's argument is not really valid as it is merely a  variation- a biased article can be rewritten as pointed out by Rmosler. Now, there is some evidence in the article of independent notability (although most of the references lead to the company's own website). It was mentioned in this article: http://bwnt.businessweek.com/interactive_reports/it100_2008/index.asp?sortCol=id&sortOrder=1&pageNum=2&resultNum=50 which alone does not satisfy criteria for notability. It is a little difficult searching for it on Google due to the very general nature of its name, but I have found several mentions of it (many of them more than just trivial) in the Google News archives: http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Transcend-Information-Inc-Announces-Worlds-Largest-MultiMediaCard.htm, http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-28863876_ITM, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-20559036.html, http://businesstechnology-asia.com/news/show/Bharti-Teletech-to-Promote-Transcend-Information-in-India.html etc. At any rate, it appears to be a relatively major player in its industry
— user:Dominik92, 05:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UGLY (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)