Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007
The current year is notable.  I can source it by the calender on my wall, or if you prefer, you can look at my date stamp.   For the record, because you disagree with the reason being offered for a deletion somewhere else, you're nominating an obviously valid article because "it fits the same criteria and therefore should be deleted".  Not only does that assume that we're proving non-notability (notability can be reached in several ways, and only one is needed to be included, not the other way around), but it's most definitely |disrupting to prove a point, despite what you think
— User:UsaSatsui, 21:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)