Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whogasm
nominator doesn't mention that there is also a reference to an article in ''The Daily Telegraph'' http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3641059/Did-Doctor-Who-do-it-for-you.html; also, three of the "blogs" used as references are associated with two major publications (''The Guardian'' and ''The Stage'').  That easily surpasses the requirements of , and establishes both notability and verifiability.  As for the coverage being centered around a particular time fram, isn't that an issue for pretty much all the articles in :Category:YouTube videos?  These things are popular for a while, get media coverage, and then fade.  I realize that this is sort of a  point, but I haven't seen  used as a deletion argument for viral video articles before
— User:Josiah, 05:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Notability)