Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Royal Book of Lists
The https://www.newspapers.com/clip/76967718/the-royal-book-of-lists-by-matt/Victoria Times Colonist reference is not very long, I'm not sure I would call it substantial as it is one of several reviews in an article. I feel that the review is trivial, so #1 of  is not met.  Is the Guelph Mercury review longer?  None of the other criteria at  are met
— User:Cxbrx, 20:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK||WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)