Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taquan Air
Well, if the entity is notable, there would be an article about in the Anchorage Daily News. And there isn't. There are some articles the ''mention'' the entity, but if I read  right we are looking for ''coverage'', something like at least a short feature on the entity itself. And if the Anchorage Daily News doesn't care about the entity, why should we? On the other hand... gee, it's a nice enough article. Someone went to to the trouble to dig up ''27'' refs and do all that writing, and you hate to just toss that away, and  is just a guideline, and its not like the article is spam or anything like that. I know, we're not supposed to pay mind to article quality, but you kind of can't help that sometimes. I don't really know what to "vote", it seems on the bubble, but given all the discussion above then a '''no consensus to delete''' close would seem reasonable to me
— User:Herostratus, 19:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)