Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxy's Ruler
The "keep" arguments seem to be primarily ,  and , which in my opinion are not sufficient enough to overcome  and . Perhaps as some have pointed out, there will more written about this in reliable sources in the (near) future, but the mainspace's purpose is not (once again in my opinion) to act as an incubator for "articles" about subjects which might someday be the subject of . Nobody has suggested this yet,  or  might be worth considering if there's a strong feeling that this might someday be notable; the creator or anyone else interested in doing so can continue to work on imroving and adding citations to reliable sources. Then, it can be submitted for  review if or when the concerns expressed in this AfD have been addressed
— User:Marchjuly, 01:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:VALINFO||:WP:ITSUSEFUL||:WP:EFFORT||:WP:NOR||:WP:TOOSOON||:WP:SIGCOV||:WP:DRAFTIFY||:WP:USERFY||:WP:AFC (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)