Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jelq (2nd nomination)
my own searching leads to a whole bunch of aggregation sites, SEO spam and forum posts. I'm not able to find any reliable source for it. This article just gets used as a repository for low value spam links. The previous AfD over seven years ago in 9/2005 closed with no consensus, but there was no real argument provided by proponents of keep. Article fails to stand on its own merit and even if there is some coverage, its similar enough that posting it as a new article instead of keeping it together as a sentence somewhere is a 
— User:Cantaloupe2, 06:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CFORK (Wikipedia:Notability)