Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places blurred out on Google Maps
The notion is sound. I don't agree with the  claim, because Google Maps is a fixed source. How is saying that "at this location in Google Maps, there is blurry imagery" different from saying that "on this page of Das Kapital, there is mention of the proletariat"? Furthermore: The article could be re-done based only on material documented elsewhere -- like Google Earth Community, Virtual Globetrotting (which has a "satellite problem" category), and other existing GMaps/GEarth placemark collections that include notations or categories. So even if I were to concede to the OR claim, which I don't, it still would be a valid article topic
— User:KeithTyler, 17:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)