Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecopsychology
With over 4,300 hits on GScholar, this looks like a ''highly'' notable topic. The field has its own journal, http://www.liebertpub.com/eco Ecopsychology and that page, too, distinguishes ecopsychology from conservation psychology. Along with Rhododendrites' sources, there is good evidence in RS that the two fields are considered distinct, and that is good enough for us. The article itself is well-structured has some citations. There might be some synthesis, but nothing that cannot be fixed, per . A highly notable topic, good evidence in RS that this is a distinct topic and an article with surmountable problems suggests keeping the article
— User:Mark, 21:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SURMOUNTABLE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)