Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doom Builder
It's being "good" doesn't enter into it, as that is a subjective view (see ); I personally think it's a fantastic editor. However, it needs to be shown that sources that are both |reliable and wholly independent of the subject and coder have written about it non-trivially
— User:Drat, 01:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)