Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination)
if for no other reason that this statement ''"This article has long been a source of controversy, and is regarded by many as a  violation ..."'' is no more than an appeal to the public and ''argumentum ad verecundiam'', the authority being the alleged "many".  (A use of "many" nebulous enough to imply that the "many" are in the majority). But, I digress, the term and concept exists, we are here to report it.  Improve the article, don't delete it just because you find it displeasing and contentious
— User:Jim62sch, 21:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)