Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryli Morgan
per nom.  The fact she may be "relevant" to the genre is not part of , or , and is unverified in any case.  For that matter, fails  for lacking any reliable documentation outside of her own website and IMDB.  Only 167 distinct Ghits out of 508 general hits, and Alexa says her website isn't in the top 100,000.  No multiple non-trivial articles by third parties, though there are a few movie fanzines.  No evidence her movies have won awards, been a major work, nor has she won any awards or contributed substantially to her field.  The article is a resume, and WP is not a free webhost.  I'm willing to concede one review of one of her films by Joe Bob Briggs, though considering his interest in her body, I'm uncertain how this would relate to s requirement for '...widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field
— User:Tychocat, 10:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)