Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denial of Soviet occupation
WP:COATRACK|coatrack synthesis. I waited with the vote thinking that the article will be reasonably fitted to wikipedia rule. The creators once again genuinely fail to understand the  policy. Someone starts with ahttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Denial_of_Soviet_occupation&oldid=159677475 juicy personal essay, and then after improvements under the pressure the artcle turns into a weird cactus. While the correct way for a historical article is to start with |solid, scholarly sources and then expand the topic with newspapers and what not. Right now whole article is a complilation of supporting statements and  '''not a single quootation''' that discusses the "soviet occupation denial" '''as a phenomenon''' or "a point of view" as the article says. Any new content absent in other wikipedia articles (not so much of it: 2-3 short paragraphs) may be safely merged by the contributors into "Soviet occupations" article
— user:mikkalai, 06:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)