Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donofrio v. Wells
Instead of just outright keeping an article on this one case, why not roll it into another article?  I have a feeling that while this case might probably be closed tomorrow with the supreme court rejecting it, we are not going to hear the last of this.  This most likely will morph into some type of theory that various web blogs and such will keep alive like any other conspiracy theory.  My thinking is that instead of having an article on it's own, why not create a much larger article covering the theories just like we have for all the JFK conspiracies, 9/11 conspiracies, and so on.  That way if someone wants to know about this case they will see it listed on the same page as a variety of other cases.  Then if this case becomes so notable to outlast the recent attention it is getting now, then an article should be written then.  This case/issue still falls under the  policy and the only reason the article was created in the first case was due to the fact it was not included any where else.  So lets give this case a home where it should be included instead of being it's own article
— User:Brothejr, 22:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RECENT (Wikipedia:Recentism)