Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Ansari (actor)
The notability test for an actor is not passed just because roles are ''listed'' — it's passed by the depth of |reliable source coverage he did or didn't receive ''for'' having roles. But that's not what the sources here are doing: #4 and #5 are |primary sources that do not assist notability, #3 tangentially verifies the existence of a show while completely failing to even ''mention'' his name ''at all'' in conjunction with it, and #1 is a Q&A interview with his ''sister'' in which he gets a glancing namecheck, not coverage ''about him''. The only source here which is about him is #2, but that's not enough sourcing to clinch a GNG pass all by itself if the rest of the sources around it are all worthless — and even it isn't covering him in the context of his acting, but just in the context of being sexy to look at. Which he sure is, but that's not an article-clinching notability claim for an actor in and of itself (hotties can still fail NACTOR and ugly people can still pass it.) So no, none of this is good enough sourcing to get him over a notability criterion that requires good sourcing
— User:Bearcat, 19:36, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)