Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disruptive physician
Our policy  explains that "''One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written.  Another perennial source of confusion is that some paper dictionaries, such as "pocket" dictionaries, lead editors to the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent.''"  I have made a start on expanding this notable topic to help dispel this confusion
— User:Colonel, 11:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)