Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MKR (programming language) (2nd nomination)
This is a procedural keep as the spirit of process was violated in renominating four days after the close of first.  The  1st AfD had it's chance at the article. If sourcing is so important as a rationale to delete, it should have been included before.  Repeated nominations of an article are disruptive, and the existence of an article that may be, or may not be, sufficiently notable is infinitely less destructive to WP that violating process for some supposed immediate gain.  Also, it's inappropriate to delete articles that can be improved, per 
— User:Becksguy, 20:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)