Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podorowsky, Thompson & Baron
unless significantly more evidence of notability is produced. There are a number of issues with its sourcing. The first link is a wikilink, not a source. The second link is a small newspaper--may help support notability, but doesn't satisfy it alone. The third source, the pdf, is a primary source which only verifies the sale of land to an attorney; it doesn't substantiate anything in the article, and it doesn't verify notability. The fourth source is from a premium site and per  "should not be linked unless the web site itself is the topic of the article." (I don't know what it says; I didn't pay.) The final source is a student paper An American Bar Association magazine article about the undergraduate activities of one of the partners. A http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Podorowsky%2C+Thompson+%26+Baron%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a google search of the current firm name yields 7 hits, 2 of which are Wikipedia. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=nrw&q=%22Podorowsky+%26+Thompson%22&btnG=Search "Podorowsky & Thompson" gets a good bit more, but it shrinks to 31 distinct, and most of those are advertising sites. (http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:HKEnrubSBHMJ:www.manhattanville.edu/AlumniandFriends/AlumniNews/ManhattanvilleMagazine/Default.aspx+%22Podorowsky+%26+Thompson%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=28&gl=us&client=firefox-a this html version of a pdf file mentions one of the partners; http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:FJPYK9Meh-8J:www.new-britain.net/PDF/CNCL-021407reg.pdf+%22Podorowsky+%26+Thompson%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=12&gl=us&client=firefox-a this one confirms the sale of the land). The earliest name hits only Wikipedia
— User:Moonriddengirl, 20:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:EL (Wikipedia:External links)