Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Cotterill
I wish to voice my own growing concern over my perception of  on the part of the nom.  It would seem a discussion best kept on this page was taken to the talk page of an editor who opined a keep... questioning their integrity and belief in the notability of this artist. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AIkip&diff=274686798&oldid=274630561 diff 1. Bad form. And then to visit the page of an non-biased admin and question their interpretation of the ongoing discussion? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tyrenius&diff=prev&oldid=274681570 diff 2. Bad form. That he chooses to ignore some arguments in favor, or dismisses other's interpretations of guideline is fine... but perhaps he might wait until the AfD is closed to make arguments best seen at a DRV
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 19:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)