Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catriona Bhatia
Local councillors are not automatically eligible for Wikipedia articles just for serving on local councils, but the sourcing here is not strong enough to get her over  in lieu. Of the eight references here, three are  coverage in the local media where such coverage is merely ''expected'' to exist for ''all'' councillors ''regardless'' of whether they clear ''our'' notability requirements or not; another three are in Scotland-wide media outlets' local news ''sections'' for the specific local area where she's a councillor, and thus is still simply routine and expected; and of the remaining two, one is a mere table of election results in a national newspaper's comprehensive local election results section in which ''every'' councillor or council candidate across the ''entire'' United Kingdom would have a "profile" with as much information as that, and thus is ''still'' merely routine and expected. And Times #3, the ''only'' source in the ''entire'' bunch which suggests the possibility of ''more'' than purely routine and expected coverage, is (a) a deadlink whose content is |unverifiable, and (b) strongly implied by its headline to have actually been in the context of who her father is rather than in the context of anything she did in her own right. But notability is  — so if there's not enough substance or sourcing to deem her notable because of who ''she'' is, then she doesn't get a free pass over the bar just for being the ''daughter'' of someone who does. Simply put, none of this is enough
— User:Bearcat, 05:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:V||WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Notability)