Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gore Effect
Political invective?! At the same time that this is supposed to be a joke?? Oh, please. Al Gore is a  figure and we don't need to protect him from a common kind of satiric humor -- that meets  -- because we're worried he's going to be the victim of a Wikipedia "attack page". The article meets all Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Whenever I see "unencyclopedic" in an AfD, I wonder whether this is a way of avoiding saying |"I don't like it". The commentary on the phrase from Benen and Siegel show that the article goes beyond a mere dictionary definition. This is a notable example of political humor spread for political effect and inherently a proper topic for this vast, non-paper encyclopedia. Let's not censor ourselves in order to favor one side over another in a political controversy. This would make a good addition to Wikipedia:Unusual articles, joining such august company as Miss Me Yet?, Obamaism, Evil reptilian kitten-eater from another planet (we're going to protect Al Gore but leave some obscure Canadian politician to the wolves?), Stephen Colbert at the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, Polish Beer-Lovers' Party, Why I Want to Fuck Ronald Reagan|a certain horribly named article about
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WELLKNOWN||WP:N||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)