Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Brannan
per |notability for entertainers, the gay thing is sourced, and |there is no deadline&mdash; so as long as there aren't |BLP violations, I see no reason to delete.  Granted, the notability is weak, too, but ironically as a direct result of the guy repeatedly trying to delete the bad publicity (), it was actually revealed by other editors that he actually had significantly more |verifiable coverage in secondary sources than I had initially thought.  That is, I ''would have'' happily argued a delete due to notability issues, but as a direct result of the Streisand effect, it seems that the stuff the dude was trying to delete actually ended up helping to solidify grounds for inclusion. :P  Let that be a lesson to future editors:  always try to use the proper channels
— User:Slakr, 21:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:TIND||WP:BLP||WP:COI||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)