Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alanna Shaikh
with an eye to a future entry. At the moment most of the case for this entry seems to be --to me she does sound interesting and important, to the extent I'm surprised this discussion has not turned up a profile of her from an independent, reliable secondary source, and I'd love to see this entry resubmitted if or likely when that does happen (or better still, happens nmore than once), but the general principle that Wikipedia editors should not take on the task of evaluating the legitimacy and significance of primary sources seems both 1, applicable, and 2, well-advised, given the way this debate illustrates how hard that can be to sort out
— User:Innisfree987, 19:41, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORIGINAL (Wikipedia:No original research)