Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Roy
I say Keep, because she doesn't seem to be completely non-notable, because she appears to have published her articles in respectable outlets. However the |secondary third-party sources written ''about'' her, which are more important for establishing notability appear rather weak to me - hence ''weak'' keep. I understand what makes the nominator think that this is a coatracking article, but i don't think that is too severe in this case. Other opinions are welcome
— User:Amire80, 04:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PSTS (Wikipedia:No original research)