Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Séralini affair
the Séralini affair is certainly |notable, and there's no shortage of respectable independent sources which discuss the issue, so it shouldn't be hard to write a |neutral article. However, "neutral" doesn't necessarily mean "only saying good stuff"; independent sources generally point out flaws in Séralini's "research" so we shouldn't shy away from that. Just look at Bogdanov Affair, Andrew Wakefield, Hwang Woo-suk &c - instead of deleting those pages, we ''write neutral content
— User:Bobrayner, 12:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)