Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invasion (Magic: The Gathering)
No, Leitmotiv, the issue is not my feeling about retailers.  The problem is that the relevant policy () assesses notability by looking at coverage in sources ''independent'' of the article's subject. The fact that the sellers make lots of money doesn't make them independent sources; it gives them a |conflict of interest.Indeed, in Time Spiral I did miss a reference from InQuest: an http://web.archive.org/web/20071124032902/http://www.wizarduniverse.com/magazine/inquest/004170053.cfm interview with the game's designer. That's not a great example of a secondary source. Anything which doesn't consist simply of quotes from the creator
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 21:29, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)