Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shock site (2nd nomination)
Okay, I gave two sets of arguments above, but I'm rather surprised how easily everyone seems to be willing to dismiss our longstanding |no original research policy in favor of weak arguments like "Wikipedia is not censored."  Yes, Wikipedia is not censored, but that doesn't mean that offensive things should be kept regardless of other policies, just because they're offensive.  I want to endorse this side of the argument, because I want to see some discussion of this issue, not just blanket endorsements of Wikipedia not being censored, which is all we've had so far
— User:Mangojuice, 04:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)