Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unreleased Michael Jackson material (2nd nomination)
and contemplate a '''procedural close'''.  The previous AFD was just earlier this month, with the same nominator.  Last time, the argument was that at least one of the sources used was a hoax; it wasn't.  This time, the argument is that we lean too heavily on a single source.  Irrespective of the merits of that argument, it is an editorial one.  And the closing admin of the previous AFD, all of 15 days ago, noted that "cleanup ... is not a reason for deletion."  That's still true.  And 15 days is not, in my opinion, |a reasonable time between nominations
— User:Squeamish, 20:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DELAFD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)