Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure
because |notability is not inherited and the book itself doesn't seem to be |notable independent of the controversy.  As we saw with rticles for deletion/Gay Nigger Association of America (18th nomination) (yes, it was really nominated 18 times--and only deleted on the last one!), merely being a controversial topic does not protect an article from being deleted (that article was subsequently discussed on DRV many times; it is currently a redirect).  Deletion is not automatically |censorship.  It may be appropriate to have a separate article ''on the controversy'' (hence the move option) but it is not appropriate to have an article ''on the book'' since the book is not notable ''independent of the Amazon controversy''.  On the other hand, the information in the article may be useful elsewhere and notability generally is not a reason to remove content
— User:NYKevin, 20:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NB||WP:A||WP:FREE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)