Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Character shield
Per |Avoid Neoligisms -- the term is unsupported by any references, let alone reliable sources. The only usage of this phrase that I found in google searches http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22Character+shield%22+%22Star+Trek%22&aq=&aqi=&aql=&oq=%22Character+shield%22+%22Star+Trek%22&gs_rfai=&fp=f8bc9ba0718e9555, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22Character+shield%22+story&aq=&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=f8bc9ba0718e9555 postdate and mirror this 2005 Wikipedia article. There is nothing in http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&q=%22Character%20shield%22%20story&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp book searches. There is no reason to redirect a term whose only sourcing is created by the page itself
— User:CactusWriter, 22:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)