Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Sears
when I http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kim_Sears&oldid=299756187 first came upon this page, I thought this page was probably , but I had a poke around, and came up with loads of sources about ''her'', not Murray. The ones which I thought most significant are the five used for references. These numerous sources are why I think the subject is notable. It doesn't matter where her notability came from, as long as she is notable (is every mention of her was in passing, while the subject of the source was Murray, then I would vote delete, but they aren't). Passes 
— User:Kingpin13, 20:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NN (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)