Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Links (2nd nomination)
per meeting  and  through http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Critical+Links%22,+:EdgeBox%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1992&as_hdate=1993&lnav=hist1 RS in 1993, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Critical+Links%22,+:EdgeBox%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1994&as_hdate=1995&lnav=hist2 RS in 1995, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Critical+Links%22,+:EdgeBox%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1999/04&as_hdate=1999/06&lnav=hist5 RS in 1999, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Critical+Links%22,+:EdgeBox%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2000&as_hdate=2001&lnav=hist5 RS in 2000 and 2001, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Critical+Links%22,+:EdgeBox%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2002&as_hdate=2003&lnav=hist6 RS in 2003, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Critical+Links%22,+:EdgeBox%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2004&as_hdate=2005&lnav=hist7 RS in 2004 and 2005, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Critical+Links%22,+:EdgeBox%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2006&as_hdate=2007&lnav=hist8 RS in 200 and 2007, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Critical+Links%22,+:EdgeBox%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2008&as_hdate=2009&lnav=hist9 RS in 2008 and 2009, etc., I believe current concerns over issues with sourcing or sense of advert can be addressd through normal editing and cleanup
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 07:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)