Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosebery 7470
to List of Australian films of 2006 as a valid search term – Not a single news article found (see https://www.google.co.nz/search?safe=strict&dcr=0&tbm=nws&q=%22Rosebery+7470%22+%22film%22&oq=%22Rosebery+7470%22+%22film%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...5375.14017.0.14412.4.4.0.0.0.0.347.1078.2-2j2.4.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0._WtNRjoPGbI here); nothing found in https://www.google.co.nz/search?safe=strict&dcr=0&tbm=bks&q=%22Rosebery+7470%22+%22film%22&oq=%22Rosebery+7470%22+%22film%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...62048.68267.0.68638.9.8.1.0.0.0.329.1612.2-3j3.6.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..2.0.0....0.sNs6H9watmE books from a quick scan. As such easily fails the |general notability guideline. I'm happy to overturn this WP:!vote|!vote if someone can find |significant coverage in |reliable, |secondary |sources that are |independent of the |subject, as |notability standards require, or alternatively indications that this film meets FILM|film-specific notability |guidelines in addition to at least 3 paragraphs from good sources about the film
— User:J947, 04:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:SECONDARY||WP:CS||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:PRIMARY||WP:N||WP:NFILM||WP:LGL (Wikipedia:Notability)