Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman
per . No evidence has yet been presented that Richard Tylman "has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." With all due respect, the  argument holds no water. If "less notable djs, rockers and other artist wannabees" cannot meet notability guidelines they have no place either. Finally, that some of Tylman's commercial artwork was printed a handful of magazine advertisements in 1986 does not speak at all to notability, rather they demonstrate that he was once employed as a commercial artist (as were the many dozens of other commercial artists whose work would have appeared in the very same issues
— User:Victoriagirl, 21:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Notability)