Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FRSs with public religious stances
as initial author). : ''"The list may be a valuable information source. This is particularly the case for a structured list. Examples would include lists organized chronologically, grouped by theme, or annotated lists."'' Making such a list cannot be considered  - if it were then ''all'' structured lists would be OR.  I have no idea whether there will be more Atheists, Agnostics or Christians on this list - the intention is simply to present the information factually and without POV comment. When the people listed have their own articles which attribute religious positions in the articles (based on reliabile sources) additional refs seem superfluous, but can be provided if necessary. The fact that list A is not list B or C, or the possibility that people reading this list might draw conclusions which certain editors don't like, are not valid reasons for detetion
— User:NBeale, 12:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LIST||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Lists)