Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snotling
Here we go again.  The books, magazines and references on Warhammer subjects are almost exclusively produced under the direct control of the game manufacturer.  Because they wield explicit and strong control over their intellectual property, an unlicensed fictional or out of universe account of this unit is highly unlikely.  The significant coverage available on this subject comes from Games Workshop publications and publishing houses (White Dwarf (magazine)|White Dwarf, Fanatic magazine, the codexes and the works of fiction are all published and produced by games workshop).  The sources listed above in the AfD (as no independent sources in the article are cited) provide a textbook definition of what is meant by a Wikipedia:N#cite_note-0|trivial mention.  Each source either mentions the text string "snotling" in an entirely different context or only mentions it in passing on the way to discuss another subject.  It is plainly not our business to populate this encyclopedia with items simply because some company has published material about them.  This feeling is expressed in the guideline  and in the overall outcome for the warhammer AfD's (overwhelmingly, the articles are deleted or redirected).  We should respect that consensus and that guideline and delete this article as it fails |the general notability guideline and meets no daughter guideline.  Arguments to keep the article based on logs of edits, searches, or inherited notability don't cut the mustard.  Delete it
— User:Protonk, 21:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)