Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Iorio (2nd nomination)
Also Nsk92 does not refer to merit and content, do not take into account wiki rules themselves at all clearly ignoring  them, refutes to use NASA ADS and deal with the irrelevant sockpuppet stuff. David Eppstein writes deliberately distorted and clearly incorrect statements. Everybody (serious) can check that, actually, NASA ADS and GS do '''''not''''' yield same results at all. David Eppstein, why do you refute to look at all other papers by Iorio NOT considered by GS but considered by NASA ADS? It is incorrect to state that Iorio's h-index is padded by self-citations. The non-self citations are 663. Anyway, it is  a fact that you are ''deliberately ignoring'' the wiki rules about  and otability. These are facts, not speculations. All here adopt the same points by Lucas: "I don't want to hear what you say", or "I refute to put my eye in the telescope
— User:Megalobingosaurus, 22:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)