Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BRitic
I was curious as to whether it was even real (or a hoax) when debating (read edit warring!) over the capitalisation of the name. Now that someone else seems to think the same, it suggests maybe it isn't notable. Furthermore, the sample text section seems rather |original research to me. Perhaps adding a few paragraphs to English spelling reform would be more appropriate
— User:Nouse4aname, 14:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)