Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Philip Gale
I count 10ish (I may have double counted a reference) reliable sources that specifically talk about his death and span a 6 year timeframe.  Additionally he as a person fulfills the .   On wikipedia neutrality does not mean censored, it means that the editors are faithful to the reliable sources.  Six of those sources talk about how people tied his death to his involvement with Scientology.   a failure of POV in this case would be to whitewash these sources from the page, and not mention how reliable sources are talking about how his death may have been caused from his involvement in Scientology.  The death itself is significant, has had a lasting impact in reliable sources, and the page layout provides  by talking specifically about his death and then having a aftermath section which is in length proportional to the reliable source distribution
— User:Coffeepusher, 16:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NPOV||WP:WEIGHT (Wikipedia:Notability)