Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversial Israeli and Zionist quotes
Ignoring for a moment the quote farm (which should go) & the website list (which should also go) as editorial issues - and ignoring the strong |POV this article completely hinges on whether or not one can consider a series of websites selectively publishing "controversial" quotations as a phenomenon.  This is really the crux of the article.  Deeming these "Israeli and Zionist" quote sites a "phenomenon" is not ; i.e. there is no external source provided (and I could not find one myself) that has documented the "phenomenon" of this type of quotation.  That being said, This makes the very central point of the article |original research, unless sources are provided that this has been documented as a "phenomenon" by |reliable sorces.  Drop the contention that this is a phenomenon and you are left with a link farm and quote list... both violating .  There are of course websites that selectively choose quotes to publish, but this is a general practice, not limited to sites quoting Israelis about Zionism.  I could find you dozens of websites that only mention the witicisms of H.L. Mencken, while completely ignoring his racist comments.  That doesn't make an article called People quoting H.L. Mencken selectively an encyclopedic article though.  Without sources that this is documented as a "phenomenon" the very contention of such is original research and what is left is an indescriminate collection of information
— User:Isotope23, 04:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:RS||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)