Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OxiClean (2nd nomination)
As pointed out at , "if the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD". In order to establish whether "normal editing" can fix an article, ''some'' amount of diligence is required, but which the nominator doesn't seem to have done. A http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=oxiclean&cf=all Google news archive search shows on the first page at least two reliable sources independent of the subject that provide significant coverage of the product: http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2004/05/03/focus1.html the Denver Business Journal and http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/23/business/media-business-advertising-flush-with-infomercial-cash-company-that-makes.html The New York Times
— [[User Talk:Bongomatic|Bongo]][[Special:Contributions/Bongomatic|matic]], 03:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)