Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumers' Institute of New Zealand
I added some statements with citations, so now there are some sources. I feel that what I have added demonstrates that the subject of this article has received significant coverage in multiple publications which are independent of the subject, and for that reason, this article meets Wikipedia inclusion criteria and should be kept. However - I work for a sister organization of Consumer NZ - Consumer Reports in the United States. I know nothing about Consumer NZ and actually these kinds of organizations exist in many countries. I have a |conflict of interest by Wikipedia community guidelines so the usual practice is for me to declare this when I edit articles which could be promotional and for me to ask other editors to put extra scrutiny on what I do. I actually am employed to share consumer information on Wikipedia - see  for some descriptions of what I do. Thanks
— User:Bluerasberry, 20:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:CONSUMER (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)