Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Balabin
I'm still not completely sure how I feel about this.  Mostly, I feel incapable of assessing the references as they're in Russian or only mention Balabin.  I can't read the others but that doesn't mean they're not |verifiable.  I misunderstood others before regarding "another encyclopedia" implying notability as I assumed they meant another language WP.  I'm not sure that another encyclopedia implies notability and I'm certainly not going to attempt to argue the |reliability of a 19th century Catholic document (Catholic Dictionary) although I can see how someone could.  I'll I can really say is that I don't have the ability to assess notability at this point.  I would be making assumptions that I'm neither comfortable nor qualified to make.  I didn't !vote as I'm the nominator but this would be changing my !vote to '''Neutral
— User:OlYeller21, 13:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)