Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payoneer (4th nomination)
There's a lot of sources. None meet the criteria for establishing notability. Repeating that this article meets the criteria because of the outcomes of previous AfD's is not a good argument unless it can be backed up with arguments in relation to policy/guidelines and more importantly, sources that actually meet the criteria for establishing notability - namely intellectually independent references that do not rely on company-produced materials or quotations. The problem with {{u|Cunard}}'s references (every single time - and that's leaving aside the length of the post) is that while the *sources* might meet the criteria for reliable sources (yay!) the references themselves invariably fail to meet the criteria of  and/or . For example
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)