Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian apologetic works
It has already been explained that  is a style guide, not a reason for deletion, and I don't see how any of the criteria of  remotely apply to this article. Maybe the nominator could let us know which criterion he or she had in mind? And, if this is a content fork, it is a perfectly valid |summary style fork: if anything Christian apologetics#Further reading should be culled rather than this article be deleted
— User:Phil, 18:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SAL||WP:NOTDIR||WP:summary style (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)