Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promenades Drummondville
mdash; The main policy and guideline-based arguments given to delete are |failure to meet general notability (WP:N / ). Arguments over its size are irrelevant unless secondary sources can |verify the notability thereof (). Furthermore, |common outcomes at AfD () is a descriptive essay of what someone, in their |original research or |personal opinion thinks happens or happened at some point in AfD history&mdash;it is '''not''' a consensus-backed |policy or |guideline. On top of the issue of , the article in its current form is a #DIR|directory entry, and, failing a clear assertion of and verification of |reliably-sourced notability, it is also in violation of that policy, too. Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) is also '''not''' a policy or guideline yet. On top of all of that, we don't take our hints of what's notable from a glossary section on "allbusiness.com," nor do I personally believe we should start to. Ever
— User:Slakr, 00:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:OR||WP:ESSAY||WP:LOP||WP:LGL||WP:NOT||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)