Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Slade (2nd nomination)
I think  is a better notability guideline than  in this case: despite the deletion sort listing under academics and educators, Slade's books seem aimed more at industry than academia. Regardless, it's not hard to find multiple published reviews of his works http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1480866 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=565419  http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-126449561.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-80869959.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-84879190.html. The nominator's claim that this is self-promotion appears to be false, easily seen to be false by looking at the article history, and an unfortunately common violation of 
— User:David, 03:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Notability)