Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Joanna Yeates
Massive amounts of coverage well beyond anything  covers (that's a prohibition of basing articles on ''routine'' coverage; wall-to-wall coverage of this disappearance and murder investigation are not "routine"). If you actually read  you'll find it advises against early deletion nominations, and points out that recent events are not automatically non-notable (that would be a perverse position). If the coverage dies away you can consider alternatives like a selective merge to List of unsolved murders in the United Kingdom, but this mania for nominating high-profile investigations has to stop. It's ridiculous, you make Wikipedia a laughing stock by doing this
— User:Fences, 14:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)