Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony James Hall
finally, somebody who fails .  I thought that was pretty much impossible.  Anyway, I'm inclined to go for delete per .  Yes, he's had a couple of book reviews but there hasn't been any ''meaningful, sustained, in-depth'' coverage by reliable sources that have editorial oversight.  A quick https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Anthony+James+Hall%22&rlz=1C1CHBD_en-GBGB755GB755&oq=%22&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l3j69i57.760j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Google search shows that there is third-party coverage on him, but the vast majority of said sources are not considered reliable
— User:DrStrauss, 15:10, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)