Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerhard Kramm
A number of the commentators here seem to be acquainted with one another from previous talk regarding Kramm and perhaps other articles related to climate change and, furthermore, there seems to be a thinly veiled theme of taking sides for or against this article based on Kramm's stance on global warming. ''This stance is irrelevant to his notability.'' We are only debating whether he satisfies ''any'' of the standard notability guidelines, although it's pretty clear that  is the most appropriate. There also seems to be confusion on sources. Specifically, it has been argued that unless there are ''biographical'' sources, he is ''not'' notable. This is patent nonsense and there is an enormous body of precedent that contradicts this assertion. I've already demonstrated above that he has a body of scholarship that has ''conservatively'' (per WoS) been cited >350 times, which satisfies  #1. Wikilawyering counterclaims that these sources provide no information for the article are false. At the very barest minimum, his published papers (which are, by definition, ) can be combed for places of employment, research interests, accomplishments, etc. and the article can be a stub with this information. In this case, however, there would also seem to be additional biographical info in the material that
— User:Tillman, 15:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)