Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straight pride (3rd nomination)
To me, the two most significant arguments against a keep seem to be  and the pragmatics of merging. With respect to the first, I don't feel the article is synthetic/OR, for me it falls underneath the "of course" threshold if sources only presented single incidents.  Moreover, that isn't the case, there are a few broader linkages evidenced in sources as well, e.g., the Mass. Gov's office ref., the USA Today ref. With respect to the second question, whether it's pragmatically better for the reader to arrange the information one way or another, I believe that a separate article (this one) with summaries and links at Gay Rights and/or LGBT rights opposition is perhaps the best way to present coverage of each topic and not unnecessarily duplicative. (See also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FStraight_pride_%283rd_nomination%29&diff=486302112&oldid=486300433 this diff for clearer statements of which two refs I was acknowledging
— User:Joe, 05:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)