Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabel Bigod
References, to the extent I can check them, appear to be database listings and short of "in-depth" coverage, which leaves this article technically short of .  I'd cut it enough slack to stay over the line were it not for two factors.  First, in my experience, the reliability of individual genealogical entries in databases is often overstated, editorial oversight is weak.  This creates a  problem.  Secondly, and yet confirming the first point, the veracity of of much of what has already been said was called into question 100 years ago based on what one reliable source described as conflicting sources
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)