Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheek to Cheek (album)
Eh. I was going to close this as redirect, but have you looked at the article? It has multiple reliable sources that discuss multiple aspects of the album (release and pushed back dates, and so on). The major counterargument I could see would be that the sources cover more of their collaboration than the album, but that would mean that their collaboration had the potential of independent notability anyway. Moreover, this would be a merge rather than a redirect because the article's been maintained quite nicely (kudos to whomever). But this belies the point that the article topic does meet the |GNG with the current sourcing and doesn't raise any red flags otherwise. Not being released is not a disqualifier, and the linked  says so itself. I don't know what points the nom thinks the album fails, but it's going to need more than a vague wave. The proposed merge target, Bennett, could use some merging of basic details regardless of how this AfD closes.  czar&nbsp
— User:Czar, 00:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NALBUMS (Wikipedia:Notability)