Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Glasgow
I think that the biggest issue with the article is it focuses on the Drew Peterson case, and to a lesser extent the use of dogs in courtrooms to help calm children. You may be right about all the points about a potential conflict of interest, in which case that could be raised and addressed. As well as its tone and the sources that are used. I think a lot of people coming in fresh don't understand the importance of |reliable econdary sources|secondary sources
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:S (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)