Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penis game
I admit I do not like this article, and I have never heard of the game. But Wikipedia is not censored, and "liking" something is not a requirement in the |notability guideline. A Google News archive search http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22penis+game%22&num=10&as_price=p0&sa=N&start=10 shows a few refs which have substantial coverage of this game.   Some refs are not about this innocuous inanity, but are inappropriate touching, comparison of equiment, or indecent exposure. But very much on topic are  http://media.www.smudailycampus.com/media/storage/paper949/news/2006/02/03/TheMix/Stacy.Looks.On.The.Brighter.Side.Of.Male.Immaturity-2276950.shtml , http://media.www.redandblack.com/media/storage/paper871/news/2007/08/23/OutAbout/superbad.A.Dirty.Pleasure.For.Opening.Weekend.Audience-2934692.shtml http://media.www.jhunewsletter.com/media/storage/paper932/news/2004/11/12/Features/Some-Pillow.Talk.That.Wont.Put.Your.Partner.To.Sleep-2244075.shtml (Do campus papers count for satisfying "multiple reliable and independent sources?"). Since variant versions in other countries/languages are claimed to be part of the article, there could be additional references. The BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_4180000/newsid_4188100/4188145.stm and a paper in Wales http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-131957250.html had some coverage of "Bogey game," but BBC talking about a BBC program is not very "independent."  (edited
— User:Edison, 00:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)