Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies
You're absolutely right that many articles violate  by including a "notable members" section. Without reliable sources that those members actually did something of note for the organization involved, all that stuff needs to be deleted. Remember that |we have no deadline, which is why |this stuff sometimes stays around. But if that were an argument to lower our standards, we would end up with accepting the worst article on WP as the standard used to measure all others... Finally, you above "keep" !vote does not contain a single policy-based argument, meaning that the closing admin will most likely ignore it completely. If you want your voice to count, you should base your arguments on  or , instead of aspersions about peoples' motivation
— User:Randykitty, 16:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTADIRECTORY||WP:DEADLINE||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:GNG||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)