Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SteatoTest
and the closer should completely disregard Eastmain's argument as having no policy or guideline basis. We require independent sourcing: none of that exists as pointed out by Jytdog. Merging spam also makes no sense, which means it is not a ''reasonable'' alternative to deletion, as after we merge it we'd just have to remove it again. Deletion is the only outcome supported by our policies here (i.e.  and 
— User:TonyBallioni, 01:40, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)