Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEOmoz.org
The large amount of prominent coverage at Google Books alone is sufficient to meet  and exceed the trivial coverage outlined in . Several books on Search engine optimization repeatedly mention SEOmoz.org and discuss it in depth.http://books.google.com/books?id=osAaZHcEbtkC&pg=PA209&lpg=PA209&dq=%22SEOmoz.org%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=1opiES8r_6&sig=3xwABUWkhmav8Jv83ChiH0poiN0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wXtsUJ_JGqz8iQKZrYGoDg&ved=0CFEQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22SEOmoz.org%22%20-wikipedia&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=7Cjb0zZjdYEC&pg=PT63&lpg=PT63&dq=%22SEOmoz.org%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=KsfZfpZikS&sig=8cMNObdvFb5YF1VyZ3CWCGGdlvA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wXtsUJ_JGqz8iQKZrYGoDg&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAQhttp://books.google.com/books?id=Pnv_6UJ_KKMC&pg=PA258&lpg=PA258&dq=%22SEOmoz.org%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=54AFs3rXnA&sig=7mvN2fuckDLLsWbwJ_55M3I04pc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wXtsUJ_JGqz8iQKZrYGoDg&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22SEOmoz.org%22%20-wikipedia&f=false etc. SEOmoz.org is frequently cited as an authority in mainstream news articles about SEO (''Hotwiring Your Search Engine; Google a Topic, and the Results Are Based on Popularity, Right? Wrong. Inside the Shadowy World of {{'}}SEOs{{'}}.'' Stone, Brad. Newsweek, December 19, 2005. ''Net Investment; Your Money'' Sunday Mirror (London, England), February 26, 2012. ''Web site search engine optimization: a case study of Fragfornet'' Gandour, Aurélie; Regolini, Amanda. Library Hi Tech News28. 6 (2011): 6-13. ''The Goodness in the Evil of SEO'' Rushton, ErinView Profile; Funke, Susan. Searcher19. 9 (Nov 2011): 30-35.) There's definitely a lot of chaff out there: large numbers of press releases and lightly paraphrased press releases mention this company, especially in the semi-legitimate marketing news media. Nonetheless, it is clearly one of the most notable companies in its field and is treated as such in reliable sources
— User:Dennis, 18:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)