Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Better World
I respectfully disagree with the "keep" argument above; what  actually says isn't {{tq|an org is notable if it has received non-trivial independent coverage}}, it's {{tq|attention solely from local (as in - with a circulation limited to a single city or metropolitan area) media, or media of limited interest and circulation (such as trade journals), is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary}} which is clearly not the case here, and there's no indication that this is anything other than a tiny local group of minimal significance. "One of the refs is an article about the org's 20th anniversary" is a totally spurious argument; I can find equally legitimate articles in my own local paper about the 20th anniversaries of http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/more-news/new-yellow-bus-is-launched-in-midhurst-1-6728908#axzz3qvciG0x0 the Midhurst Community Bus Association, http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/more-news/celebrations-get-spooky-with-20th-anniversary-fun-1-7020300#axzz3qvciG0x0 the Hemel Hempstead branch of Specsavers, http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/more-news/club-watching-the-birdie-for-two-decades-1-7005771#axzz3qvciG0x0 the Ballymena Birdwatching Club and the http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/more-news/chilli-fiesta-at-west-dean-sizzles-1-6897928#axzz3qvciG0x0 West Dean Gardens Chili Fiesta, but it doesn't mean they qualify for Wikipedia pages by virtue of age. It's certainly possible for small local organisations to be notable by Wikipedia standards, but it needs to be demonstrated that they've had an impact significant enough to warrant the attention of those outside their local community, which this article singularly fails to do, and while it's a difficult name to Google I can't find any evidence that anyone else has noticed them.&nbsp;&#8209;&nbsp
— User:Iridescent, 19:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)