Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Seacat
I have been watching this for about a week and was originally leaning toward deletion. The article as it stood at the time of nomination was bloated and almost painful to read. I'm still slightly on the fence about it, as that I feel her notability is very marginal... but I'm going to err on the side of caution here. I don't feel that she fulfills the qualifications of , but I think there is enough extenuating notability to warrant inclusion. I would also like to commend AuthorAuthor on taking a poorly written article that is on the deletion block and turning it into quality work
— User:Trusilver, 23:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FILMMAKER (Wikipedia:Notability)