Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rule 34
and salt. We don't delete articles just because they get vandalized, but I don't see any benefit to keeping a stub for this specific rule. Since this deals with discovery, it's possible that some high-profile case will have a high-profile screw-up involving this rule, and if coverage begins to discuss it, or if some major court case or landmark decision changes it, then an article may be worthwhile. But that's an awfully unlikely caveat. As for the meme usage, someone somewhere is wondering how it will apply to this debate, and I weep softly for the future of the species. A  is appropriate here
— User:Ultraexactzz, 15:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SALT (Wikipedia:Protection policy)