Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick I. Moxley
NsK92 sums it the basic issues for me, I don't see him passing  (no extensive coverage of him in secondary sources), and so it seems fair to evaluate the impact of his ideas on his discipline via WP:PROF.  While he may be important within his organization, I don't see the reliable and verifible evidence of his impact.  DGG's point is that there has to be considerable impact, even if it is not in verifiable and reliable sources.  I suspect he may be right, but I don't think that suspicion is grounds enough to retain this biography
— User:Pete, 19:44, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)