Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Yaniv
The prior AFD was, by it's title, was exclusively about the tribunal case, so really just an expansion of what's in  British_Columbia_Human_Rights_Tribunal#Yaniv_v._Various_Waxing_Salons.  Given the case was ongoing, and only so much to say (per ), a separate article made no sense (at the time).  The local coverage helps us discuss this person as an activist, and not just reference them as a single-note individual (it gives context to the person, we can't in the tribinual article).  I think the arrest has garnered significant coverage https://nationalpost.com/news/jessica-yaniv-a-transgender-b-c-activist-says-she-was-arrested-for-brandishing-a-taserhttps://globalnews.ca/news/6304748/jessica-yaniv-transgender-weapons-charges/https://torontosun.com/news/national/waving-stun-gun-on-livestream-lands-transgender-body-waxing-activist-behind-bars.  So, it's worthy of inclusion, but will be out of scope in British_Columbia_Human_Rights_Tribunal.  Also, I think there's clear room for growth in this article, in terms of the political/cultural dimension of it.  There is https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/27/male-genitalia-week-in-patriarchy-women this editorial in the Guardian about the nature/motive of most coverage of the case, why/how it's covered, combined with questions of motive of Yaniv, that can be used (it would of course, need to be attributed to the author appropriately, as opinion) that gives a much better understanding of what is actually going on, that can be explained in the Tribunal article.  There is room for growth, but I've been intentionally slow in expansion, as I am trying to exclude the 95%+ of internet "news" that's blatantly bias and unreliable on this topic.  - —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Thivierr, 22:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)