Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenton Communications
as a general rule, I highly frown on people who strip out most of a page's content before nominating it for deletion.  If you want to discuss deleting a problematic page, then I think you ought to let people see the problems and what they have to work with, and not simply truncate the page first.  The https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fenton_Communications&oldid=566882202 prior version certainly had issues and had been the subject of |SPA editing, but some of that content might be made into something useful.  Hell, even the original https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fenton_Communications&oldid=48736428 2006 version had more content than what {{User|CorporateM}} left there before nominating this.  Bad form in my opinion
— User:Dragons, 18:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)