Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ananth Prabhu Gurpur
Nominator is correct when they say it doesn't qualify for uthor. Truly it doesn't. But it qualifies for  sufficiently. For example, India Today https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/anniversary-issue/story/20191230-cyber-sentry-1629809-2019-12-23, The Hindu https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Mangalore/Ministers-release-book-for-teachers/article14421054.ece, https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Mangalore/two-sahyadri-college-projects-to-get-80-lakh-grants/article32814574.ece, Times of India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/cybersecurity-expert-designs-free-online-course-on-cyber-safety/articleshow/78472091.cms. They have sufficient material to contribute to . There is also a lot of print coverage over the website of the subject that was brought to my notice by the creator https://www.ananthprabhu.com/media that helps establish . I had also initially rejected the article and didn't take it seriously. I only took it seriously when I saw the coverage of receiving grant from the state government to establish a center of excellence https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Mangalore/two-sahyadri-college-projects-to-get-80-lakh-grants/article32814574.ece where he is a PI. Hence, cleaned and accepted it. I have myself lost many debates to
— User:Beccaynr, 09:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Attribution)