Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Lindenberger
Rationale is given as  but this doesn’t apply as the third criterion isn’t met, clearly the event IS significant and the individual's role WAS both substantial and well documented. One reason why this strikes me as particularly pertinent is whilst the anti-vax “movement” has in recent years spread rapidly through misinformation and social media, it is only now significant numbers of unvaccinated young people are reaching the age of majority in order for this to be important. Clearly this man is something of a landmark case, hence bringing him to congress
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)