Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Capitalism
You are quite correct that it is appropriate for Wikipedia editors to |assume good faith, in fact it's one of Wikipedia's core values.  However, I will ask that you not take criticisms personally , since assuming good faith goes both ways.  Those editors above (including myself) may well have been inappropriate in calling the post-2008 section of the article "propaganda" or the like, but we were not incorrect that there was an underlying |conflict of interest that expressed itself in those sections.  Of course many people are capable of being objective in writing about their own work.  However, from wikipedia's point of view, writing about one's own work in the complete absence of verifiable secondary sources is a serious concern.  I see that you have already removed those sections, thank you, and doubly thank you for offering to work on the historical uses of this term to make a much stronger Wikipedia article.  But there's no reason to become upset when editors expect the guidelines for inclusion (|verifiability and |notability) to be upheld in an objective manner
— User:Markeer, 00:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:COI||WP:V||WP:N (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)