Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Vaughan
As far as I am able to tell the article fails  and more specifically , ,  and . I have not seen an argument for keeping it that doesn't boil down to . While I am prepared in some cases to overlook some minor deficiencies in criteria for inclusion, '''chucking all of our standards''' for someone who hasn't shown up on any RS sources or as far as we know had any meaningful roles before or since the one mentioned, is a bridge too far for me. I reaffirm my '''delete''' vote
— User:Ad, 16:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)