Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of the thimerosal controversy
but would support delete on the basis of  because there are serious  problems here. I do not feel this article should attempt to be a list of scientists who "oppose the mainstream scientific assessment of the thimerosal controversy", but would support this content being moved to List of scientists known for opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of the thimerosal controversy because that number is relatively few and it would relieve BLP concerns. The book ''Bad Pharma'' has a chapter on this topic, and suggests that despite the thimerosal controversy becoming a major international controversy, there was scientific consensus on one side and only a few researchers in opposition. Lists on Wikipedia are almost always original research as is the category system, but at least in the case of lists it is possible to provide citations to verify whether a statement is so. It seems that right now many entries in this list are poorly cited and also as I said, I feel that this list should be reserved for people for whom their position on this issue is key to their public identity and not those for whom this affiliation is merely incidental
— User:Bluerasberry, 21:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLOWITUP||WP:V (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)