Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cases of penis removal
1) No example of copyvio claim. 2) The article does have a selection criteria.  Having an article on every entry is just 1 common type of selection criteria.  There are other types (see ) as long as membership criteria is based on reliable sources.  News articles are reliable secondary sources.  Primary sources are documents directly associated with people in the events (for example, wife's diary, husband's love letter to mistress, etc.) 3) Advances the claim/conclusion one of the severed penis images is fake because few news articles publish it and original source does not cite its source.  One possibility and more likely explanation few news articles publish it because of censorship of severed genitalia in a for-profit commercial product.  All the news articles I was able to find with only the woman's image also does not cite their source.  It may be more likely as a government entity the police released the woman/penis photos into the public domain and news agencies exercise discretion in usage
— User:Esuc, 17:28, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LSC (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)