Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullshit
Comparing this article to the one mentioned by the nom is, well, bullshit (there really should be a  to go with ). Just because an article is on a word, doesn't mean that it falls under , and this one certainly doesn't. Its written from an encyclopedic standpoint, not a dictionary one. Its also reasonably sourced, and I'm sure more can be added. In short, there's no reason for deletion
— User:Umbralcorax, 16:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:NOTDIC (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)