Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur (3rd nomination)
The issue is essentially one of Wikipedia:Content forking|forking.  The nomination asserts that this is a passé fad, as if this were either true or relevant, but does not actually want us to remove Bulbasaur content from Wikipedia.  Instead, the content is to be contained in the article List of Pokémon (1–20).  The latter seems an entirely |synthetic creation of Wikipedia editors &mdash; this grouping is not supported by any reliable source and so it is tagged as requiring reliable sources.  Bulbasaur is an especially notable Pokemon, as it is prominent in the game and other media.  Putting together notable Pokemon with less notable Pokemon to make arbitrary anthologies or compilations, seems quite improper.  This list in question has not reached featured status, as the Bulbasaur article did, and has itself been nominated for deletion more than once.  So, removing a featured article to bolster a dubious and inferior list seems quite absurd and we should build upon the stronger foundation
— User:Colonel, 11:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)