Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/33 Snowfish
The trade reviews are dodgy, but there has been no official consensus on whether or not they would be considered trivial coverage. Even without those, the book has still been reviewed or mentioned by several literary journals and was made an ALA pick. It's light, but there's just enough to where I'd say this passes 
— User:Tokyogirl79, 14:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)