Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Welcome Lodge
IF there some way to independently verify the assertions in a single, somewhat obscure, secondary source. The sourcing for this article depends on the ''footnotes'' in a particular minor journal which cite a number of primary and secondary sources. If everything asserted here is true (or at least individually verifiable), the notability criteria of  are clearly met; but my concern is that the importance and notability of the subject may have been |synthesized by assembling these indirect sources, as opposed to having a real source that says directly that the Lodge was important because of its connections to particular political events. Thus given the presumption of fundamental accuracy of the sources, I argue for '''keep''' in the hope that the article can be improved
— User:MCB, 19:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:Notability)