Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Truth (painting)
per APK especially, and CoM. I found another RS, the Buffalo Examiner http://www.examiner.com/p-335517~_The_Truth___D_Antuono_Cancels_Unveiling_of_Obama_Painting_Due_to_Public_Outrage.html here with the title: "'The Truth': D'Antuono Cancels Unveiling of Obama Painting Due to Public Outrage". Reuters, the Washington Times, the National Review, and the LA Times are clearly mainstream, multiple, independent and reliable sources and therefore satisfies |notability. The NR cite is an article in a conservative but still mainstream RS; the LA Times cite is a piece, not a mention; and Reuters is a major and respected news service with more than a mention. The Washington Times is not a lot more than a mention, but at 168 words is clearly more, so it qualifies. They all add up to more than sufficient RS and it's clearly not a . Also not an orphan, and we can't speedy delete when there are keep votes. I'm not sure about the cat, have to research that, but it's not the subject of this AfD
— User:Becksguy, 22:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)