Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principles of energetics
WP:NOR|original research.  I draw the court's attention to the second paragraph: ''This article pays tribute to Odum's statement of the principles of Energetics. Reference to the first four principles are included only to orient the reader and contextualise Odum's work. As noted, some researchers consider the Onsager reciprocal relations are loosely held to be the fourth principle, and so the situation is moot.''  Are we here to pay tribute?  I think not.  Is that paragraph comprehensible to a general readership, as the second introductory paragraph of an article might be expected to be?  I'd say not, and some of my best friends are chemists.  Is the subject of Energetics covered?  Why yes it is!  So did the author expand that?  No, they just added a link to the new article and pasted in their end-of-term paper.  And does this article have much substantive content beyond the flummery at the top?  Actually not much, and some of it is speculative.  If anyone feels wqualified to judge how much of this is |verifiable then do feel free to merge it, the redirect will not, I think, be needed
— User:Just, 17:30, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)