Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing (2nd nomination)
I don't think merely having an impact factor indexed by SCOPUS meets the "is frequently cited" of criterion 2 at the essay .  Anyway, it seems likely that the correct guideline is not one about academic journals, but one about peddling in pseudoscience, , which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  There is at least one independent secondary source that mentions this journal in passing referred to in the article as known for publishing pseudoscience.  (It gives the example of a study of whether it is possible to embed "intent" into chocolate.)  It discusses this journal along with two others, and concludes that "these three journals are ''shams masquerading as real scientific journals''" (emphasis mine).  This strongly urges us to apply NFRINGE in our assessment of the journal, and if there are more such secondary sources, I think this article could be kept under that guideline.  Otherwise, I do not think it meets that guideline, and therefore should be deleted
— User:Sławomir, 13:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NJOURNALS||WP:NFRINGE (Wikipedia:Notability)