Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puck App
I don't see a basis for deletion.  Apps may not be inherently notable, but this one passes GNG based on significant coverage in reliable sources (which are already cited in the article).  And while GNG is a guideline that doesn't always need to be followed, no one has presented a good reason for not following it here nor am I aware of one  (and  is not a valid reason
— User:Rlendog, 15:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)