Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul LaViolette (3rd nomination)
barring any more convincing evidence, to give some credence to notability, in which case I will revisit this discussion) From the above, I conclude, that this subject does not meet our |notability guidelines, as I unable to find sufficient coverage in '''independent''' |reliable sources. Considering the apparent efforts to promote the notability on non-reliable websites, and the consequent efforts to validate it on Wikipedia, I do recommend that if we can agree this matter, '''we should also |salt the page'''. I'd also like to apologize to everyone here for taking time by removing the PROD
— User:Chzz, 03:04, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SALT (Wikipedia:Notability)