Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google monopoly
as essay or content- or maybe even POV-fork of some other Google article. If none of the sources support the claims they are claimed to support, then it's indeed |hopeless personal ramblings and should be deleted. If there ''is'' any salvaveable content, merge it into the existing Criticism of Google article, since this topic is just one more example of that, and even as written and assuming it were all completely citable, seems  on one criticism aspect. Given that WP seems to frown on "Criticism of..." sections in articles themselves (vs actually writing coherent/unified content), not sure a "Criticism of..." article is better, so "One specific criticism of..." is surely going the wrong way
— User:DMacks, 13:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:UNDO (Wikipedia:No original research)