Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People wrongly convicted in the United States
but remove anyone who is still convicted.  It's not wrongful until a court agrees.  Do '''NOT''' remove people whose were "overturned on a technicality".  That will lead to endless arguing over what constitutes a "technicality", AND it's just as likely to exclude the "innocent" as the "guilty" (technicalities don't play favorites).  The law has declared these people not guilty; it's preposterous, and a violation of  for us to claim differently.  Even if "everyone knows he did it"; heck, even if he later admits he did it!  "Convicted" is a legal term, and it's silly to use anything but the legal definition in an article on this topic.  (I might suggest moving it to People wrongfully convicted in the United States, though, as "wrongful conviction" is the most commonly used term for this.)  Oh, and the bloody thing needs references and citations, of course.  As it stands, it fails / completely, but it's a clearly notable topic
— User:Xtifr, 14:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:ATT||WP:V (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)