Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluoride Action Network
Are mentions on other anti-fluoridation sites unnotable because anti-fluoridation is just dumb in your view? ''" Its not my view. Notability is not importance, "'''''mentions on other anti-fluoridation sites'''''" or popularity... Notability is based on Wikipedias content policies and they apply to ''all articles''. Wikipedia requires the existence of Wikipedia:Reliable sources|"reliable", Wikipedia:Independent sources|"third-party" or "independent sources" so that we can be confident that we're not passing along random gossip, perpetuating hoaxes, or posting |indiscriminate collections of information. Wikipedia requires that all articles rely primarily on Wikipedia:Independent sources|"third-party" or "independent sources" so that we can write a fair and balanced article that complies with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and that articles are |not advertising an organization. ''Fluoride Action Network'' does not meet this criteria and clearly fails Wikipedias |inclusion guidelines. Also, attributing motives to fellow editors ''is'' inappropriate
— User:Hu12, 01:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IINFO||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)