Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tiedtke (2nd nomination)
Any argument invoking local coverage is bunk (it's Orlando, Florida, not Orlando, Oklahoma, and should we disregard ''The New York Times'' coverage of prominent New Yorkers?).   states "{{xt|If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability}}". Coverage in multiple independent sources exist. The essay  discourages the argument that local coverage is a valid reason for deletion.  Note that coverage also exists in a ''Toledo Blade'' obituary https://www.toledoblade.com/news/deaths/2004/12/24/Toledoan-was-supporter-of-arts-museum/stories/200412240042.  The article can and should be improved with a tone more removed from the laudatory nature of some obituaries, but Articles for Deletion is not Articles for Improvement
— User:Animalparty, 20:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:ITSLOCAL (Wikipedia:Notability)