Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuralink
Clearly satisfies . I understand the nomination is based on the assumption that after the launch, there were "No further sources or available coverage detailing anything further detailing sic the company's plans or progress", but that is simply wrong - I just https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neuralink&diff=863492785&oldid=863235652 expanded the article based on the in-depth Gizmodo report from 2018. PS: While I appreciate the effort to keep speculative medical claims out of the article, let's not go overboard with MEDRS, and pay attention to Wikipedia:Biomedical_information#What_is_not_biomedical_information?. Regards
— User:HaeB, 04:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)