Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl gamer (2nd nomination)
Topic is clearly notable, as evidenced by several conferences with academic research and organizations with groups specifically dedicated to it (linked in article). |But then we'll have to create a zillion other X in Y articles--yes, as soon as there are sources demonstrating that it's a notable topic. There really are given sources that specifically focus on ''the female aspect'' here, not just two columns of parallel data, so cloning it and swapping every gendered word, as appears to have been the y genesis of Guy Gamer, isn't an automatic keeper if the girl article survives. The term itself does not even need to be used (although others say it is used), per  policy, as long as it clearly describes the topic. However, some of the issues really are gender-comparison-related (or at least also highlight the current male-dominance of the field). There is an active discussion on article talk-page involving several ideas for renaming to something involving the term "gender" instead of highlighting one particular one--that doesn't require an AFD to resolve
— User:DMacks, 13:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WAX||WP:POINT||WP:NOTNEO (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)