Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about Rainbows
Does not come anywhere near notability. None of the three "keep" editors has provided any reason that stands up to study in line with Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. The linking to other list articles by Billdanbury (the author of the article) is irrelevant, both for the reason given at  (the other articles may deserve deletion too), and because they may perhaps have features which make them more appropriate than this one: merely pointing to the fact that they exist does not establish that they are on the same level as this article. Colonel Warden suggests that the list satisfies , but it doesn't. That guideline says "A list topic is considered notable if it has been '''''discussed''''' as a group or set by independent reliable sources" (my emphasis) not "if you can manage to find a catalogue somewhere that gives another '''''mere listing''''' on the same topic". Northamerica1000 does not give any new reason at all, but just refers back to the two other "keeps
— User:JamesBWatson, 12:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)