Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hem Chandra Chowdhury
This looks like a person who'd be a dozen times notable in Europe but sourcing presented does not seem to establish . The time period suggests there should be books covering him if he is notable, which have not been presented. At the same time, it's hard to imagine he would not have  when everything is dug up, as it will be in time, especially considering Banglapedia, which looks reputable enough, apparently a work of hundreds of Bangladeshi scholars with a grand mission. So, I suggest a Keep on  grounds, but wouldn't fault an opposite outcome based on what has actually been presented. It would be an unequivocal delete if Banglapedia turned out to unreliable/spam-prone, but there's nothing to suggest that such is the case
— User:Usedtobecool, 13:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:THREE||WP:NPOSSIBLE (Wikipedia:Notability)