Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs of Blood and Sword
easily meets  & 's #1, which states that "the book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles,...and reviews". It has received quality reviews from all across the globe. In fact, among others, it has been reviewed by the likes of William Dalrymple (historian) & Thomas Lippman. Here are some of them
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BOOKCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)