Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Sequenzia (2nd nomination)
but ''without prejudice'' against being re-created from a more reality-based perspective. The article, before the current content dispute https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amy_Sequenzia&oldid=897470105, was based entirely on overly-credulous sources treating a discredited pseudo-science as though it were real. I can understand (per ) using those sources to establish ''notability'', but it's pretty tasteless to treat them as unbiased fact, especially in a BLP for an unfortunate person who can't share their side of the story through any real method
— User:ApLundell, 00:57, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DESCF (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)