Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernie would have won
The sources are not actually demonstrating that this is the ''name'' of a specific meme, they're simply demonstrating that this is a statement of opinion that some people ''believe''. Almost all of the sources here are not covering a ''meme'' per se, but are simply op-eds or interviews in which people ''state'' their ''opinion'' on this question in ''words''. And yes, ''one'' source demonstrates that some people communicated their belief by making Bernie Sanders memes — but even then, "Bernie would have won" is the underlying ''idea'' those memes are trying to communicate and not the ''name'' of any specific notable meme in its own right. So this is a matter of somebody trying to reify an unfalsifiable and untestable opinion — it's impossible to go back in time and rerun the 2016 election to verify whether these people are correct or not — into a named thing by citing every piece of opinion journalism they can find that happens to agree with them, and then ''calling'' that a meme even though the sources overwhelmingly don't support that label. The place for any content about the belief that Bernie Sanders would be in the White House right now if he'd been the Democratic candidate in 2016 is in Bernie Sanders' , not in an article titled with a statement of opinion
— User:Bearcat, 15:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)