Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massutmaning
per nom. Arguments about its significance are emotive . Arguments for potential persistence are : Wikipedia's role is not pre-emptive, particularly where the impetus for creating an article smacks of borderline  for both the author and the book in question. The fact that we're arguing |"other stuff" speaks to a shaky case |verifiability, not |notability
— User:Iryna, 21:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ITSIMPORTANT||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:PROMO||WP:OSE||WP:V||WP:N (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)