Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pissing contest
Several things actually: 1.)  isn't a policy, and in fact, it technically isn't even a guideline - it's an ''interpretation'' of a section of , thus, in effect - it is an essay.  2.) The article (pissing contest) isn't written as a "definition", and is therefore not even in any violation of the "Not a dictionary" section of .  It is referenced, and the the references are somewhat reliable resources.  3.) That leaves the notability aspects of it all.  IMHO this meets our , Therefore I'd have to say keep.  The one thing (and it's mentioned above) that perhaps could be done would be to split the two items (the actual "contest" and the "phrase") and |dab them.  At this point in time I don't really see enough content here for that however.  Having read through all of this, I think the strength of the '''keep''' !votes here have more strength in their arguments than do those who lean toward the '''delete''' camp
— User:Ched, 14:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NAD||WP:NOT||WP:GNG||WP:DAB (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)