Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thefederalist.com
Although I changed my vote to "weak keep" I'm concerned that in spite of the large number of insignificant mentions in links provided above the only sources which can plausibly be construed as meeting the  requirements are a thoroughly negative Politico article and a couple articles from Physics Today and the Washington Post concerning The Federalist's criticism of Neil Degrasse Tyson. I worry that it will be impossible to write an article based on that which doesn't violate  standards. I think that keeping the article is really a stretch but I support doing so in the hope that other useful sources will turn up. Obviously I'm also concerned about the apparent foul play, but that doesn't affect my opinion
— User:Sammy1339, 21:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)