Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Ferguson (photographer)
I know the consensus so far has been 'delete', but I did a bit of in-depth searching and found some non-trivial coverage to satisfy  - namely http://www.fotofreo.com/2008/projections2008-1.phphttp://www.viiphoto.com/more-photographer.php?photographer=Adam%20Fergusonhttp://www.100eyes.org/2009/11/adam-ferguson/http://www.cdp.edu.au/cdp/conferences-and-events/speakershttp://current.com/items/89015424_adam-ferguson-his-lens-on-manipur.htm, and to some extent http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/10/02/picturing-americans-at-war-in-afghanistan/ (the first one also goes part-way to satisfying 's 'significant exhibition' criterion). The list goes on. Therefore, I'd say that this article satisfies the |general notability guideline - ''significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
— User:JulieSpaulding, 07:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)