Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trash Talk (band)
I removed the speedy tag because it was inappropriate. Before this was even speedy-tagged the article already contained references from Rolling Stone and Spin magazine - not in-depth coverage but enough to make speedy-deletion inappropriate.  involves looking for alternatives for deletion, and at least making some effort to find coverage, before bringing an article to AFD. Had you searched for sources you may have found, within the first few pages of Google results, coverage from http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/14102-eyes-nines/ Pitchfork Media, http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/cxm5 the BBC, http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/apr/21/new-band-trash-talk The Guardian, http://drownedinsound.com/releases/15391/reviews/4140008 Drowned in Sound, http://drownedinsound.com/releases/14989/reviews/4138701?relevant-artist and again, http://stereogum.com/365591/trash-talk-explode-video-stereogum-premiere/news/ Stereogum, http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/rbpn BBC again, and Rock Sound (http://www.rocksound.tv/news/article/trash-talk-get-robbed, http://www.rocksound.tv/reviews/article/trash-talk-eyes-and-nines). See also http://www.metacritic.com/music/artists/trashtalk/eyesandnines Metacritic - reviews from Q Magazine, NME, Absolutepunk.com
— User:Michig, 17:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)