Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Larman
Yikes, I did a quick Google Scholar on "Craig Larman" http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22craig+larman%22&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C22&as_sdtp= and his first single-authored book is cited by 2352.  Easily meets  -- which does not require coverage ''of the individual'', but cites / discussions / uses ''of their work''.  That's what the the first test means: "1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." and if you look at all the other tests you will see that this is a common thread.  We don't look for mainstream or secondary resources covering the individual -- that's quite rare, since it's much more important that consumers of media receive adequate information about footballers, entertainers, celebrities and occasionally politicians if sufficiently scandalous.  The gist of  is that scientists and academics are notable through their research
— User:Lquilter, 19:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)