Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love-shyness (2nd nomination)
Reasons for nomination fail to pass muster. The article contains references from multiple sources This is absolutely not original reasearch, and calling it fringe is ludicrous, and inconsistent with discussions on other article talk pages of what constitutes "fringe." If it is mentioned in books published by oxford univeristy press, I think that makes shoots down any claims of . Let's not waste time deleting this as it likely will be restored again as more information about it continues to be published. There are dozens of articles that were deleted for the same reasons only to later be recreated when the topic became too mainstream to ignore--Special:Contributions/173.75.214.124|173.75.214.124
— [[User talk:173.75.214.124|talk]]), 01:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:MEDRS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)