Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wedding dress of Kate Middleton
I've seen some pretty retarded articles around here over the years, from Michelle Obama's arms to Yul Brynner's bald pate, but this tripe gives them a run for their money.  Simply being "in the news" is not the only criteria to create a wikipedia article, that is why we have safeguards such as .  A notable event of this magnitude is bound to have many side stories of quirky/irrelevant interest as the 24/7 drive-by media begins to run out of things to talk about and they cast about for some filler.  This reminds me of every Thanksgiving when we get a full rundown...in many, many media outlets...of what is on the White House dinner table.  Reliably sourced?  Sure.  Encyclopedic?  Not so much.  Mention it in the main article, but there's no call to devote encyclopedia treatment to a flippin dress
— User:Tarc, 16:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)