Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Firth (2nd nomination)
I wasn't contradicting your reliability of sources issue. But now you mention it, I will. Expressly ruled out? More like expressly ruled in: from , "Neither online nor print sources deserve an automatic assumption of reliability by virtue of the medium they are printed in". Basically, take it on a case-by-case basis. In this case, I think the article should definitely stay. Although we can't quantify his fanbase, I'm sure you're underestimating it when you say 30 seconds of fame among a tiny section of newgrounds fans... I admit that I am a fan, but I've never been on newgrounds. And I certainly have been a fan for more than 30 seconds
— User:JonONeill, 18:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)