Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Fair Cop
The book has not received the necessary |significant coverage from independent reliable sources. A search at http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22A+Fair+Cop%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22A+Fair+Cop%22+bunting&oq=%22A+Fair+Cop%22+bunting&gs_l=serp.3...10199.11804.1.12015.8.8.0.0.0.0.160.950.3j5.8.0...0.0...1c.1.X4n6rvHj_Io&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=c5f8586ec6d2eddf&biw=980&bih=693 Google News finds minor coverage in minor publications, with the single exception of an article in the Yorkshire Evening Post. Both the Wikipedia article and the book (and even the book's title) are blatant examples of special pleading, telling one side of the story - what I call "ain't it awful" reporting. The article should be made more neutral if it is kept, but IMO it should not be kept because it fails Wikipedia:Notability (books
— User:MelanieN, 15:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:42 (Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything)