Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimedia Commons
First off, while it isn't a typically valid argument, Wikimedia Commons definitely passes the http://www.google.com/search?q=wikimedia+commons&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a sniff test. I'll go out on a limb and say by the 69M results there that it passes . Secondly, http://www.eschoolnews.com/eti/2005/03/000717.php there http://www.golem.de/0505/38234.html are http://moreresults.factiva.com/results/index/index.aspx?ref=OKLD000020050829e18t0000a secondary http://alacarte.lexisnexis.com/partners/int/google/landingpage.asp?id=21334412&mtid=1&ws=9j0hDk1UboE=&ws_pub=The%20News%20&%20Observer%20(Raleigh,%20North%20Carolina)&ws_date=August%2031,%202006&ws_len=1251&ws_lni=4KSJ-RJ50-TWK0-52PK-00000-00&ws_lastupdate=20060831&ws_title=Free-for-all%20collaborations%20build%20from%20ground&ws_refer=http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=wikimedia+commons&num=10&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ldate=&as_hdate=&lr=lang_en&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring= sources http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=RHHB&d_place=RHHB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=10E512A3F121CDF8&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM out http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-6102451.html there; http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4450052.stm they're easily found using a Google News search, so it passes . Finally, articles being of somewhat poor quality isn't a reason for deletion, the last time I checked
— User:Disavian, 00:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)