Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/86 (term)
To be honest, I cannot find a decent policy-based argument around the appeal to how |Wikipedia is not a dictionary, whereas Wiktionary is a dictionary. I’ve been looking at sources for 86’ing, and all of them are about etymology, which fits uncomfortably close to what the policy is describing. On the other hand, I don’t recommend deleting it because 86 is a well-known acronym that people will want to look for, even outside of the Twitter controversy. Wiktionary is a wiki that provides articles about words ''qua'' words, and most discussion about this word is etymological. Reference to definitions of words can be added to these articles. If a definition is not yet found there, one should find it used in a speech or similar published source (tweets would not count, but there are better sources out there anyway) and put it in
— User:Discuss, 02:10, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTDICT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)