Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spooky Southcoast
Single-station local radio programs don't pass  unless the sourcing is ''really'' solid, but of the three sources here two of them are |primary sources and the third just glancingly namechecks the show's existence rather than being substantively ''about'' it. And Ravenswing is entirely correct that in 2016, when almost every radio station in existence has a live webstream and individual programs ''frequently'' get reupped as podcasts, almost every radio program that exists at all could self-promotionally ''claim'' to have a worldwide audience — so "worldwide audience because stream/podcast" isn't an inclusion freebie under  either, if |reliable source coverage ''about'' the show isn't present to ''demonstrate'' that the program is ''actually'' getting any significant degree of international attention. So no, none of this is good enough
— User:Bearcat, 19:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NMEDIA||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:NMEDIA||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)