Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lima: Breaking the Silence
Although it is no doubt the duty of the nominator to run a BEFORE search, when the claim is that a BEFORE search has produced no coverage, I feel that an effort should be made on the part of those wishing to preserve the article to prove the nominator wrong. A page view count is a relatively meaningless statistic at AfD; we measure notability primarily by amount of coverage in reliable sources, not by page hits. Additionally, language barriers can usually be mitigated with Google Translate. There are a couple reviews in the Spanish article that seem noteworthy: the https://elcomercio.pe/luces/cine/hollywood-fallida-vez-quiso-relatar-toma-embajada-japon-lima-noticia-544685-noticia/ El Comercio (Peru) review and the http://rayray.utero.pe/2017/04/23/alguien-recuerda-esta-peli-sobre-la-toma-de-la-residencia-por-el-mrta-video/ rayray.utero.pe review. The https://books.google.es/books?id=5dSEDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT100&dq=%22Lima:+Breaking+the+Silence%22&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjM36vizqzhAhUFExoKHWa6AToQ6AEILDAA#v=onepage&q=%22Lima%3A%20Breaking%20the%20Silence%22&f=false book source has a couple paragraphs about the film. https://www.cinencuentro.com/2007/09/21/el-extraditado-fujimori-en-el-cine/ cinencuentro.com looks like it could be reliable though it seems to be a niche website. The German article has https://www.filmdienst.de/film/details/514089/127-tage-todesangst this Film Dienst source with a "long review" hidden behind a paywall. Other than that, the https://www.new-video.de/film-127-tage-todesangst/ New Video source looks like minor/routine coverage. Overall, the amount of coverage is somewhat underwhelming for an American film released in 1999, but I think it might be ''just'' enough to meet  guidelines. I think I would support either keeping the article or merging some of it to the director's article, Menahem Golan
— User:Mz7, 19:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFILM (Wikipedia:Notability)