Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of terms in Xenosaga
Let me just run down a few things.  First off, the reliable sources: '''the game is a reliable source.'''  More specifically, it's the '''primary source''', and as such is perfectly suitable for matters of  and , but ''not'' .  Instead, notability is in this case asserted by the "parent" article which the list was (presumably) split off from: Xenosaga.  From : "''Minor characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be merged with short descriptions into a "List of characters." This list should reside in the article relating to the work itself, '''unless it becomes long, in which case a separate article for the list is good practice'''.'' (emphasis mine)  The rest of the nominator's objections warrant a cleanup, not a deletion
— User:Yukichigai, 11:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N||WP:FICT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)