Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chester Hill High School
Seems to be a well written and encyclopedic article to me that meets  in citing multiple independent sources appropriately. While I respect that the nomination was in good faith; I really don't see the need for deletion. At the absolute worse a merge and re-direct could occur - but I don't see the need for that either. OTNEWS is important, but it is pretty clear in the article with the sources used that security deserves at least a mention. NC means that  is mostly irrelevant to individual sections or sentences of an article (though , ,  e.t.c are not), and content can be added which does not directly add to notability such as primary sources to add context. Only the article as a whole usually needs to meet , and I am quite confident this article does, like most high school articles should do
— User:Camaron, 20:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NNC||WP:V||WP:UNDUE||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)