Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bricemanning
Apparent |original research, almost a classic example of  in action. I am unable to find any evidence of this term being used in a |notable  or independent publication. The arguments in favor of keeping it seem to forget that Wikipedia is |neither a personal soapbox for social change nor a dictionary. We don't make change happen, we report the changes that are ''already'' happening with as |neutral a tone as possible, if that makes sense. Where the primary purpose of an article is to "get the word out," something unencyclopedic is probably going on. Just my two cents. Regards
— User:Luna, 09:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NEO||WP:RS||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:No original research)