Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red String (webcomic) (2nd nomination)
Looking into this further, one of the references given is ''Newtype (magazine)|Newtype USA'', a magazine. That should be looked into further, of course - can anyone dig up a copy? - but with that and Comixpedia, I'm ready to support the article as the subject seems to have multiple reliable, third-party sources. Both should be integrated into the article properly, of course, but if we started nuking stuff for being in need of work instead of irredeemable, the next major change in standards would blow up the encyclopedia. :-)Now lessee here. The rule-of-thumb (also known as a "notability guideline") used for web content is , laboriously made to meet the unique position of online content. It requires the fulfillment of any of three criteria. Multiple non-trivial published works? That seems to be in order. Well-known independent award, or multiple nominations for such? There was a repeated wrangle over the state of the WCCAs. The decision was... well, mainly "NOT AGAIN," but they were accepted. This was a bit ago, though. A year or two. Distribution through a respected, non-trivial, independent medium? 159.182.1.4 points out that the strip is published by Dark Horse Comics, which is right behind Marvel Comics and DC Comics. Check. The article meets all reasonable standards for keeping
— User:Kizor, 13:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)