Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish subversion
I never called you an anti-semite. I said that the "article appears to be anti-semitic in nature." But it's interesting that you jumped to that conclusion, which is just as interesting as you pointing out that another editor is Jewish, and that is why "he wants it deleted." Cries of censorship, persecution and pointing out irrelevant information about someone's identity are odd ways to reach consensus (reminds me of certain groups, but I digress). By the way, my comment above pointed out that ''is'' allowed as a reason for deletion (i.e. it does not say that we can't use it, as you have claimed). As for "it's here to stay, whether you like it or not" and "I always engage myself in AfD debates when articles I've created and worked on, are listed for deletion": you may want to check out . The fact remains, many of us feel the article is not worth keeping. That is our opinion. You can continue to obsessively watch this page and reply to ''everyone'' who disagrees with you, but I will move on. My opinion is here for the record. Have a nice day
— User:Freshacconci, 18:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:OWN (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)