Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomos Roberts
the Washington Post article contributes to notability, and the NZ herald is likely also contributory, but I haven't seen anything else that remotely comes close to contributing to independent coverage. Furthermore, at this point, even if more coverage of this one "viral" event was found, this is exactly the reason that  exists. It's a weak not-vote from me because it may be that this person is notable, but the user posting wall of text here has done absolutely nothing to help that case, and has been hurting it by presenting literally dozens of unreliable sources/invalid arguments in this discussion. The user fighting for this article does not appear to have read any of the help they have been provided - and I also suspect based on their history that they have a heavy COI with this article - regardless of if they claim they do not. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez
— User:Berchanhimez, 19:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)