Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/99designs (2nd nomination)
responding to ping.  There's sufficient sourcing to demonstrate notability.  The Forbes piece is a staff written article, not a guest "contributor" which I think is what causes concern elsewhere. The Sydney Herald and Fast Company pieces are also good.  I read and use Techcrunch a lot - it's quite reliable. Based on existing sourcing, the company meets . And now that the fluff has been culled, it read a lot better
— User:timtempleton, 20:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)