Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Bombing Division
I'm the admin who removed the tag, though I ''did'' actually read the article.  It's simply not patent nonsense.  Distinctions like one kind of plane replacing another don't qualify as "nonsense" to me.  And linking a name to a disambig page is a common error in new aritcles.  Given the research by the nom, it does appear to be a possible hoax (which is not a speedy deletion reason). If it is |unverifiable, I'm fine with deletion.  I've seen the nonsense tag applied with what appears to be great haste lately, and have removed them when the article does not fit the criteria. My doing so isn't a reflection on the quality of the article, or the tagger
— User:Dina, 17:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)