Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann M. Clarke
Her GS citation counts look pretty good for someone who mostly published in the pre-Internet era. ''Mental Deficiency'' was an edited collection, but quite a widely-reviewed one https://www.jstor.org/stable/25390186https://www.jstor.org/stable/25409877https://www.jstor.org/stable/23635664https://www.jstor.org/stable/20472360https://www.jstor.org/stable/2172075https://www.jstor.org/stable/23700941. So was the 1976 ''Early Experience''  https://www.jstor.org/stable/1043460https://www.jstor.org/stable/41161755https://www.jstor.org/stable/23651815. The 2000 ''Early Experience'' was authored, rather than edited, by Clarke and Clarke, and it was also reviewed more than the token amount for an academic book https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2538477/https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-11/edition-9/early-experience-and-life-pathhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/car.654https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-psychology-and-psychiatry-and-allied-disciplines/article/early-experience-and-the-life-path-by-ann-clarke-and-alan-clarke-jessica-kingsley-publishers-london-2000-pp-127-1195-pb/B133CCE1EF67B8CEDBEF29A3D1AC88E5https://doi.org/10.1054/cupe.2000.0096. Being an Honorary Fellow of the British Psychological Society (confirmed https://www.bps.org.uk/about-us/history-psychology/founders-fellows-presidents-members here) may also qualify for #C5#C3. I don't have time today for a deeper evaluation, but I'd be inclined to !vote "keep" unless someone had a rather good counterargument
— User:XOR, 23:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)