Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiral galaxy dynamics
The only reason to keep this would be as an example of all the things that a Wikipedia article should ''not'' be.  Apparent , lack of , no |secondary or tertiary sources (except a gratuitous link to Hipparcos data), looks more like an  than an article about a tangible and well-defined subject.  Admittedly the author was advised several years ago to shovel all the crap out of a more conventional article into something like this, but if it actually described ''spiral galaxy dynamics'' in a complete and non-partisan way then likely nobody would have objected in the first place.  Did I mention we should get rid of it?  Possibly, as such a general term, there would be no harm in redirecting, but it is hardly a likely search term
— User:Lithopsian, 19:59, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:GNG||WP:PSTS||WP:ESSAY (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)