Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Joseph Rovelli
I can't find anything out there that would establish notability for Rovelli. The SUNY mention seemed promising, but that's pretty much the only thing out there that's usable. This is a pretty common issue with anything that even remotely smacks of : someone can be known in their field, yet never receive coverage in places that Wikipedia would consider usable as a . Most of what I found were forum posts, blog entries, and the like- nothing that would show that he passes . I tried looking for sources with the name "Zephyros93" (the handle mentioned in the SUNY book), but couldn't find anything with that either. Other than the one mention in the SUNY book (which isn't enough by itself to show notability) there's nothing out there that's usable. This is required for notability purposes. It's unfortunate that this tends to be the case with fringe topics, but Wikipedia is not here to make up the difference
— User:Tokyogirl79, 06:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)