Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Disney Channel stars (2nd nomination)
If the lack of references isn't a reason for deleting the article, and I do agree that on its own it isn't, then it shouldn't have been the main reason for declining the prod, the main point of which was that the article fails .http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_stars&action=historysubmit&diff=331562789&oldid=331562417 The lack of references was mentioned because it is a factor that makes this an article of questionable value. The article is now two years old and not a single reference has been added, or is likely to be added. As such, the validity of the entries is questionable despite wikilinks. (See my earlier comments on Josie Tysoe for an example)  states that "''Wikipedia articles are not lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as (but not limited to) quotations, aphorisms, or persons (real or fictional).''" This is clearly a list of real http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_stars&action=historysubmit&diff=331191196&oldid=330998099 and sometimes fictional people, so the policy says it's not Wikipedia
— User:AussieLegend, 22:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTDIRECTORY (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)