Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg N. Gregoriou
need in depth independent reporting on him to support the key claims of notability ("well known", highlighting certain papers/contributions as "important", and similar statements). "His most important contribution" is an article on which he does not appear to be the main author (need actual cite that ''he'' is notable ''for this'', not just that ''this is notable'', per  and being the best of one's work doesn't make it good beyond oneself). Article suffers from COI (NPOV is evident in writing, describing financial journals as "scientific", academic boosterism of his PhD institution, etc) and seems thinly rewritten from copyvio, so I think the''subject'' is uncertain/marginal and ''this article'' is into the realm of TNT. Admins will be able to see from the deleted history a chain of COI editors working to get this person into WP
— User:DMacks, 01:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)