Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream Pod 9
Came here from a closed DRV. Can a company be notable for having products which were reviewed given ? The only potentially significant coverage of the company I've seen are the two Lien Multimedia articles published within four days of each other, unfortunately require a subscription to view completely, and I'm not sure that's a reliable source, or whether the articles are PR. Many of the links provided above are links to reviews of the company's products and are not of the company themselves. Even if we're going to start accepting self-published academia, Dream Pod 9 is only mentioned once and as a throwaway, which may be a good source for the article but not to demonstrate notability. Even assuming ''Designers & Dragons'' is a good offline source for , there's still not enough here to pass . If anyone has offline sources which discuss the company and not the company's products, please let me know. I also don't mind if the game-specific prose gets merged into its respective game
— User:SportingFlyer, 22:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:NORG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)