Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Lynch (2nd nomination)
The articles rely heavily on newspapers of local significance and a book of questionable literary merit as such the subjects cannot be considered notable even outside their hometown (). As such the people described in the articles are no different from any other common early 20th century British prostitute. They are not related and had never interacted with any people worthy of an article. Had they been men, common housewives or were born later into the century the article would have been speedily deleted without a single objection (), yet people want to keep it simply for the quality of its prose. With a variety of sources available one might write millions upon millions of articles on people of their caliber, we DO NOT need that to get an insight of her profession or era when articles such as Prostitution in the United Kingdom exist. I frankly do not see how the procedure used in  cannot be extended to prostitutes. Wikipedia's obsession with and glorification of criminals not matter how petty they are has reached its crescendo
— User:Catlemur, 19:06, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTOBITUARY||WP:PORNBIO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)