Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul LaViolette (2nd nomination)
Not an easy decision to make. On the one hand, it does look like he passes . On the other hand, when you read further there really isn't any indication that his contributions have made significant impact. We need third party sources to show that these were infact significant contributions to physics. So, delete per nom
— User:Vyvyan, 16:54, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)