Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Thomson, Stella Vine, and the Stuckists
Rubbish that misrepresents Vine (favourably) and her opponents (badly). Some of it is sourced to primary sources (including Thompson and the Stuckists) and some to broken links, but where available secondary sources are often misrepresented, failing to acknowledge criticisms of Vine or to present the POVs of her opponents, while blowing up passing mentions into claims of great artistic significance. For instance, her accusation that Saatchi was engaging in anticompetitive practices is presented in a very one-sided way, quoting only Stuckists and ex-Stuckists, despite  issues. Sarcastic praise is quoted as genuine praise, and abuse is ignored. Hence, it badly fails . If there is any encyclopedic content, then POV and referencing issues can be fixed by editing, but this is trivia and gossip. For another example, the fact that her ex-husband includes her in a list of artists who the Tate overlooked, published on a dubiously- websitehttp://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/stuck-inn-v-what-is-wrong-with-sir-nicholas-serota/, is hardly worth writing about. And nor does every bon mot of Vine and Thompson deserve immortality. If anyone is bothered to extract the iota of legitimate content and merge it, fine, but deletion is more realistic for this non-notable topic
— User:Colapeninsula, 18:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:NPOV||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)