Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IC Markets (2nd nomination)
There's no doubt the company exists and even mentioned in newpapers, but that doesn't mean the company is "notable". !voters above claim that it meets  - but as per , NCORP guidelines set the criteria for references and these are examined fairly strictly. Looking at the references posted above, a fair few of them are very obscure websites and others are broker "referral" sites - these are not "independent", they exist simply to push people towards certain brokers and collect a referral fee. For example, https://55brokers.com/ic-markets-review/ 55brokers uses the exact same descriptions as many other websites such as mytopbroker.com (which although no longer exists you can still see the descriptions https://www.sitelike.org/similar/mytopbroker.com/ here and https://www.scamner.com/check/mytopbroker.com here), https://thatreallyworked.com/no-1-ecn-account/ thatreallyworked.com review is practically identical as is https://trade-leader.com/forex/icmarkets trade-leader.com, https://forexsuggest.com/ic-markets-review/ forexsuggest.com, https://dailybluepips.com/ic-markets-forex-brokers-reviews/ dailybluepips.com and many many more. The use of the exact same descriptions and text means that the content is being provided by the company - its their form of marketing. Also, check out https://www.icmarkets.com/global/en/company/about-icmarkets the company's *own* description and you can see that it says the same stuff too. Another referral site listed above is https://forexbrokerlisting.com/forex-brokers-reviews/ic-markets-review/ foxbrokerlisting. https://bestctraderbrokers.com/ic-markets-get-cysec-regulation/ BestcTraderBrokers focuses on the community of brokers and traders that use the multi-award-winning cTrader platform on a daily basis - so designed to promote those brokers, not independent, fails ORGIND. https://www.thenextbitcoin.net TheNextBitcoin.net is also not "independent" and even carries a disclaimer https://www.thenextbitcoin.net/terms/ here, fails ORGIND. This leaves us with https://www.publicfinanceinternational.org/ic-markets-review/ PublicFinanceInternational which looks good, has no disclaimers and claims to have done all the research, but has a referral system in place. Big red flag though is that the founder, Ziga Breznik, appears to also promote himself as an SEO expert and also promotes https://www.quora.com/profile/Ziga-Breznik First Page Elite which  attempts to convince you to http://firstpageelite.net/blog/ sign up for his video on how to make $$$$ selling on Amazon. There's more online if you look. Hard to treat this as a credible source, fails . The remaining references are https://financialcommission.org/2020/11/06/ic-markets-continues-to-suffer-problems-with-expansion-to-the-italian-market/ this announcement fromm the Financial Commission which offers no in-depth information on the company, fails CORPDEPTH; https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/brokers/exclusive-ic-markets-takes-inter-milan-to-court-for-dumping-sponsorship-deal/ this mention in Finance Magnates also has no in-depth information on the company, fails CORPDEPTH; https://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/fake-margin-calls-forex-traders-furious-after-losses-20150127-12ypsm.html Two https://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/sock-puppets-and-lifeline-ads-welcome-to-the-wild-world-of-copy-trading-20201210-p56maf.html articles in SMH and one in https://www.reuters.com/article/australia-markets-regulator-idUKL3N26E0SY Reuters which mention the company but they're either talking about an event involving the company or they're fleeting mentions-in-passing, none though which meets CORPDEPTH criteria. I've searched and the majority of stuff is PR or referral sites with some newspaper mentions-in-passing or an article talking about how some brokers complained about false margin calls - none of which meets NCORP criteria
— User:HighKing, 21:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)