Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Judaism (2nd nomination)
It has not been explained above why the article is not considered notable, as I clearly see numerous sources and the fact that the article correctly lists types of criticism of Judaism, which fits under the subject. I do not see original research in the article, as the references very clearly define where the information in the article is taken from. POV problems (and OR problems for that matter anyways) are not criteria for deletion. I view the article more as a list proper, just with information for understanding. The subject headings all fit under the subject of the article properly and the sources show that the article clearly passes . There are numerous other articles on Criticism of religion (even a Criticism of Religion article), so I believe the subject is notable. Per , my showing of these other articles provides consistency for this article and should not be dismissed offhand. I also believe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Criticism_of_Judaism#FAQs this section on the talk page properly explains away other assumed problems with the article
— User:Silver, 10:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS (Wikipedia:Notability)