Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Jeong
This appears to be a case of verzealous deletion.  is satisfied here. There are adequate  for the old article, and more RS covering the recent incident, this is enough to satisfy . The BLP1E restriction doesn't apply, because the original article is already acceptable, and the twitter controversy is ongoing -- this may be only the beginning of an entire arc of events, it is too soon to judge. Furthermore, the individual and the controversy are closely related, it would be easiest to document the controversy on the existing article. If we choose not to document it, the existing article can stay, there is no need to delete the whole thing (talk page drama is not a reason to delete, that can be moderated in and of itself). Finally, I have serious concerns about the motivations of this request for deletion -- I notice that the article was allowed to stand until the recent controversy, after which a request for deletion was put in almost immediately after. This gives the appearance of a partisan maneuver designed to obstruct coverage of the recent controversy -- if so, this would be endentious editing. Controversies often elicit strong reactions, but Wikipedia is , which is yet another reason to Keep
— User:Bigdan201, 15:16, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:O||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:BLP||WP:T||WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:Orphan)