Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oddjob's hat
as an editorial decision. I'd have to concede that the GNG is met. There's enough coverage in third party sources to , and provide real world context about the hat so it's not just a summary only description of a fictional object (something that Wikipedia articles are ). But this is one of those circumstances where a cluttered stub article could be written as a nice couple of paragraphs and added to the main character entry. That creates the potential that the whole Oddjob topic/article could one day reach good or featured article status, which does better service to our readers
— User:Shooterwalker, 19:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:verify notability (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)