Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DHS media monitoring services
so  point 5 is closest in relevance, in effect the monitoring being a "product".  Thus the key aspect is "short articles that consist only of product announcement information are not appropriate.". Number of sources & standard notability are irrelevant - the question is "is there sufficient encyclopedic information?", otherwise we should merge it to the DHS (or related) article. On that, I am unsure - the actual detail on the project is 5 or 6 lines, duplicated source to source, just with some differing viewpoints
— User:Nosebagbear, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CBALL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)