Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter John
Existing source material is very weak; 6 from the council website referring to one of the councillors (basically a self-published source), 1 from the local Labour party about their councillor (another self-published source), 1 from a blog (Operation Black Vote) and 1 from a local community website of unknown reliability. The strongest source appears to be the Financial Times, but the reference is trivial (1 sentence out of the whole article, and much of that is a quote about somebody else). The article needs far more independent, non-trivial, |reliable sources to be sustainable
— User:Road, 01:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)