Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redmine
The only reason to ''actually'' delete would be ''actual'' lack of notability, and I just don't see that.  In addition to the Information Week article, Redmine is also cited as an important tool in the book http://books.google.com/books?id=abNvyqPNWtgC&pg=PT444&dq=redmine+project+management&lr=|Ruby on Rails for Microsoft Developers by Antonio Cangiano, and there is also an entire book on Redmine, albeit in Japanese, http://books.google.com/books?id=GVdTVYqgwZcC&pg=PR1&dq=redmine+project+management&lr=|入門Redmine Linux/Windows対応 by 前田剛.  Given that these publishers and authors feel Redmine is worthy of note, I would say it rises at least to the level of some of the other articles linked from List of project management software.  It could still be debated whether or not the article is written like an advert or has insufficient citations and references, but there are different tags for each of those.  Not fD.  I would support
— User:Drmies, 00:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A (Wikipedia:Attribution)