Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictive programming
I suspect that the subject is probably notable, but the cited sources are fringe and massively fail . A Google yielded a ton of hits but the first ten pages were pretty much all fringe and the few that weren't would still not have met our standards. As it stands it is little more than a PROFRINGE essay. The article currently fails , , and . Even if RS sources are found, my advice would be to blank the article and start from scratch. Yes, it really is that bad
— User:Ad, 17:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:PROFRINGE||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)