Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POLQA
I believe this discussion slowly drifts away from its original topic and we should restrict ourselves to the purpose of this page. The above mentioning of  ,  and  is purely speculative, not helping Wikipedia and even offensive. Let's stop that. The only thing we discuss is  and as far as this is concerned, the "red-linked" contributor made some very valuable comment (and I don't mind if somebody is concerned of his/her privacy on the internet, as long as the content of the comment is valuable). Also, where would we end up if we did see google as our only source to verify notability? Keeping in mind the many sources mentioned and coming from that specific industry, I can only confirm my above statement that this article is really notable
— User:Grizzly007, 09:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SOCK||WP:MEAT||WP:CIVIL||WP:N (Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry)