Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003–04 Manchester City F.C. season/FA Cup Fourth round replay
No one is claiming that anything has changed WRT the notability of this game.  The match is still as highly notable as it was during the last AfD discussion.  What HAS changed this time around is that the notability of this game is much better supported in the article with RS citations (amongst other improvements).  Vote / comments such as this one (which was typical of the last AfD) no longer apply: ''"'''Delete:''' the match has not received coverage other than routine reports in the days following the game. No indication that the match is notable enough for its own article."''  is a completely bogus reference here. That guidance refers to situations such as someone creating a Wikipedia article about, say, a game between Wolves and West Ham in the Premier League just because all the news media that regularly provide reportage on Premier League games covered that one too (which they would as a matter of course).  This match is notable because of how it is regarded in the consciousness of football fans, not because over two dozen RS references have been cited for it. The cited sources serve testament to the game's obvious notability; no one is claiming the game is considered notable merely because citations exist.  Your reasoning is completely backwards on this issue
— [[User_talk:Mancini&#39;s Lasagne invite to Harry|'''Mancini&#39;s Lasagne invite to Harry''']] Talk, 17:58, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)