Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Camp
Actually, {{re|Crazybob2014}} significant coverage in reliable sources matters a lot. Being made by a notable company doesn't make this topic notable -- |notability is not inherited (if it worked that way, we'd have an awful lot of very trivial articles -- http://roosterteeth.com/show look how many shows Rooster Teeth has made). Camp Camp fails to meet |the general notability guideline. I did a bit of searching, and I couldn't find a single article that I would call "significant coverage in a reliable source". I did find a few instances of reliable sources covering Camp Camp (http://ew.com/tv/2017/05/25/rooster-teeth-camp-camp-exclusive-season-2-trailer/ Entertainment Weekly, http://mashable.com/2016/05/26/rooster-teeth-new-animated-series-camp-camp-trailer-debut/ Mashable, http://www.tubefilter.com/2016/05/26/rooster-teeth-camp-camp-trailer/ TubeFilter, https://www.awn.com/news/rooster-teeth-announces-camp-camp-season-2-june-9th-premiere Animation World Network), but it was all trivial coverage -- most of them were just a few short paragraphs to accompany a trailer
— User:IagoQnsi, 00:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INHERIT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)