Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soft water path
as others have noted above, this is an essay based on a |neologism from a single scientist's work (Peter Gleick), rather than an encyclopedic article on a well-established subject. There's nothing inherently wrong with such new topics, but they should be ones that are widely researched/discussed. Redirect the topic to the author Gleick's article, where a short summary is all that's needed
— User:HidariMigi, 23:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)