Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magdalen Berns (2nd nomination)
Fails . When looking for reliable sources in the media I would suggest one look at  to evaluate. Using opinion pieces to establish notability is unequivocally against Wikipedia's Notability Policy. What is reliable can not be defined by any one editor here. It must be agreed upon by a consensus of editors. I respect someone presuming that the subject is notable and creating an article for the subject. This AfD is not to presume something already presumed, therefore any criteria which says you may use it to presume notability is null. No result here can undo the significance of the subjects life. The only thing that matters to Wikipedia is whether the subject received significant coverage in multiple reliable and verifiable independent secondary sources that confirm notability rather than presume it. I don't see it in what has been included. Sometimes there can be too many references so if anyone can point out specific sources that are on  and included in the article then I will reassess my bolded course of action. The tragedy here is that a life was lost almost two years ago to something as terrible as cancer. Lets keep everything else |civil, please
— User:ARoseWolf, 20:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RSP||WP:RSP||WP:CIVIL (Wikipedia:Notability)