Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Watch (5th nomination)
this is a well-sourced article that clearly meet  criterion number 1. This has been cited by reliable news sources on at least two separate occasions (the Seigenthaler and Essjay controversies in 2005 and 2007 respectively) so does not fall under the auspices of . #Notability is not temporary|Notability is not temporary so just because the site has been quiet since then does not mean that we should delete the article - it was notable at the time and therefore it continues to merit an article
— User:Thryduulf, 08:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)