Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Illusions
Marginally notable tech company.  After reading all of the linked sources included within the article, I believe that the subject probably satisfies the specific notability guideline for companies per  and the general notability guidelines per , but contrary to some of the outraged "keep" comments above, it's a relatively close call.  Why?  Because most of the linked sources are about the subject company's product(s), not primarily or even significantly about the company itself.  This is an article about the subject company, not its product(s); therefore, I am looking for significant (i.e., not trivial, not , not incidental) coverage of the company, its officers, its financial backers, its finances, its history, its long-term prospects, etc., and not solely about its product(s).  If the product is notable, then perhaps the product should have a stand-alone Wikipedia article, but the subject company must be notable in its own right per our notability guidelines
— User:Dirtlawyer1, 19:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)