Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RevSpace
Three sources (from Hackaday, Vice and Stadsomroep Den Haag) have been added since, which are independent, RS and have SIGCOV. Also, the first source you cite, about the Hackermeldpunt is a initiative of RevSpace where RevSpace members are being cited, so I count that as SIGCOV. The first tree sources are definitely RS, because they both have editorial oversight. See Tweakers and NU.nl. '''Update''': the Den Haag FM reference is a 20 minutes recording about RevSpace, so it definitely qualifies for : "Significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail" The same can be said about Hackaday which has an article primarily about RevSpace. Also, in the GNG is stated the following about SIGCOV: "but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." This is the case with the video about Zawadi, where the RevSpace part is not the main subject of the video, but it is more than a trivial mention. You state the following about NU.nl: "nu.nl doesn't appear in list of Dutch media and it appears to be a circulation of "limited interest", therefore falls short on significance.". I can present you https://www.svdj.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/nationale-nieuwsmerken-maart-2018.png this graph about the most visited news sites in The Netherlands published by the :nl:Stimuleringsfonds voor de Journalistiek
— User:Dwaro, 20:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)