Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David G. McAfee (2nd nomination)
Several of the Delete voters are parroting one another and are highlighting what is a spurious rationale for their vote. The subject of this article does not need to meet the criteria of  ('''which is in the ADDITIONAL criteria section''') to be be notable, if he meets the criteria in the Basic Criteria section of Wikipedia:Notability (people) -- which I and the other Keep votes maintain that he does. Also, the repeated use of "salt" by some people is quite obnoxious and hints at ulterior motives - not wanting an atheist activist to be the subject of an article '''no matter what he accomplishes'''. As I understand it, salting implies making it damn near impossible for a resurrection (pun intended) of the article no matter what future news-worthy accomplishments may occur for the subject. That seems just wrong on the face of it, and openly calling for that seems to me to display an ugly bias in some of the people voting to delete
— User:Rp2006, 03:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)