Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaakov Glasman
Does not meet  no significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.  In my opinion Jewish newspapers are not sufficiently independent sources in these circumstances.  I am surprised to see no notability guidelines for religious figures. {{strikethrough| He did not give evidence at the royal commission into child sexual abuse - he was excused}}.  He may have made comments to the media, but he was not a major player.  Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see where holding a formal position of leadership makes a person notable.  A quick google search does not reveal any coverage outside that already cited in the article.  He may be well known within the Jewish community, but he is not well known outside the Jewish community. I don't see the article as being |a puff piece
— User:Boneso, 20:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:PUFFERY (Wikipedia:Notability)