Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumer Watchdog (Botswana)
per . It seems obvious that an article about a California based organization would quite naturally have a greater number of English sources available... and that an article about a similar Botswana company might just be a little tougher to pin down. It is reasonable to expect that sources, either harcopy or Non-English, http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Consumer+Watchdog+%22%2C+Botswana&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7DVXA quite likely exist. The article deserves to be tagged for expansion and further sourcing so as to improve wiki. leanup is the solution. Deletion should be taken off the table.  And kudos to
— User:MuffledThud, 05:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CSB||WP:C (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)