Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (3rd nomination)
It has been quoted many times in major daily newspapers (see one example on the talk page) but not every Australian newspaper puts every article online. Google News Archive is not the be all and end all of the world's news. http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=railpage+site%3Agov.au This search shows 895 Australian government web pages linking to Railpage. It is an http://www.education.gov.au/goved/browse/0,3830,759,635,640?start=11&count=10 EdNA Evaluated Page approved as a school resource (this is not just a link and every site approved by EdNA as a school resource has to be evaluated). The Australian Bureau of Statistics has used it as a secondary sourcehttp://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310116.NSF/0/ec03f30964e795b5ca256dcc007c2598/$FILE/Statsercise%203%202004.pdf. Jim Betts, the Victorian Director of Public Transport, contributed to the site in an official capacity. (Taken from last Afd).  Those asking why these sources weren't included last time would probably find that the page was protected for a period of time, and within a week or so of protection being removed we're back here again and have had edit wars holding things up.   seems to be the big factor here.  I'd like to remind contributors that if the article doesn't contain reliable sources, but they do exist - then it is '''not''' a good cause for article deletion, but '''is''' a good cause for the article to be rewritten or edited
— User:59, 06:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)