Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBSC (AM)
To clarify why I gave a delete rationale: not a single one of the "speedy keep" comments are based on any Wikipedia policy or guideline, including the relevant notability guidelines.  The keep rationales given say that this article should be kept because radio station articles are "generally kept".  This is true, however that has no bearing on why ''this'' article specifically should be kept.  That such articles are "generally kept" of course means that there are articles that are not kept, and that these articles must show notability.  This is reflected by .  Arguments have been put forth on my talk page that radio station articles are "inherently notable", but this is directly contradicted by Wikipedia consensus;  specifically points out that '''no''' organization is inherently notable, no matter what kind of organization it is.  This includes radio stations.  So the argument that such articles are "generally kept" does not warrant keeping this article, as that is nothing more than commentary about the overall concept of radio station articles, not a justification for ''this'' particular article.  An article needs to show notability, not ride the coattails of articles with actual notability.  When the "radio stations are inherently notable" fallacy is discarded and this article is looked at on its own merits as it should be, it becomes quickly apparent that it fails to meet any relevant notability guideline
— User:SudoGhost, 05:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BCAST||WP:ORGSIG (Wikipedia:Notability)