Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sapiosexuality (4th nomination)
It may not be recognised by the scientific community, but it is a term that's been thrown around plenty in popular culture and there are many reliable sources that discuss it. And if the article is a dictionary entry atm that should be cause for change, not deletion. Passes  easily, especially with coverage in the ''Toronto Star'' (https://www.thestar.com/life/2017/03/28/sapiosexual-is-the-latest-it-word-on-dating-sites.html) and ''The New York Times'' (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/02/nyregion/the-hottest-body-part-for-a-sapiosexual-its-the-brain.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=2FFF70B9616E73CBC6BCD2D6D6D2B253&gwt=pay) newspapers with the largest weekly circulation in Canada and largest combined print and digital circulation in the United States, respectively
— User:Indy, 00:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)