Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Wisne (2nd nomination)
According to , athletes are inherently notable if they've played in the highest professional level, which this person has not.  According to , people are notable if they have been the subjects of multiple nontrivial independent articles, but in this case, that's a real gray area, as there are just a few articles, and they are of the heartwarming human interest style that might be written about any non-notable person- even I have been the subject of an article of this sort, and I don't think it would qualify as 'nontrivial'.   His acting career does not reach the level of notability, and the article is so promotional in tone that it will require a complete rewrite in order to meet .  As an athlete, his main accomplishment appears to be that his career was ended by an injury, and as an actor, his main accomplishment appears to be a supporting role in a movie so obscure we don't have an article in it, and television roles like "bar patron" and "party guy," neither of which are strong arguments for notability.  If I'm wrong and he really is notable, then presumably someone other than himself will inevitably be inspired to write about him
— User:FisherQueen, 21:20, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATHLETE||WP:BIO||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)