Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXodus
The |general notability guideline asks for coverage that is independent, significant, and in reliable sources.  After having verified the list of references above, many entries have problems with the "significance" prong of that test (as implied by the multiple notes of "short").  Of these, only Marshall (1989) meets the GNG criteria. Marshall (1990), Busse (1991), Welch (1993), InfoWorld staff (1994), and MacWorld staff (1994) are all not significant, being little more than mere product update announcements. InfoWorld staff (1996) is not even that - just a passing mention of the software company. I was not able to verify Rizzo (1999), but {{u|Pavlor}}'s description of it as a one page mention does not fill me with hope.  One significant  does not meet  and there is no applicable  that would apply
— User:Eggishorn, 23:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:SNG (Wikipedia:Notability)