Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keishorne Scott
I was reviewing this at the same time as Prax (edit conflicted to raise the deletion discussion), and came to the same conclusion. The subject's books are all self-published, the secondary sources referenced in the article are all fake news sites, and there's no depth of coverage in ''reliable'' secondary sources - fails , 
— User:Girth, 15:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)