Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Language Police
to Diane Ravitch, where the book is already fully covered.  The concept behind the book, that there is a serious problem with textbook publishers in the United States bowing to various pressure groups, is notable and that is likely why there were book review articles published in the ''New York Times'', the ''Washington Post'' and the ''Christian Science Monitor'' (among others).  However, while that does meet the Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Criteria|notability of books threshold that does not mean that the book should have its own article. The Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Derivative articles|guidelines go on to say, ''if the book is notable but the author has an article in Wikipedia, it may be better to feature material about the book in the author's article, rather than creating a separate article for that book.'' A simple redirect will suffice, since not much more can be said about the book than what is already in the Diane Ravitch article, except for the  of abstracting examples from the book that are particularly egregious
— User:Bejnar, 01:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)