Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faretta
As the article’s creator I obviously have no reason to vote. But I won’t go back and forth with people who don’t know jack shit about modeling. Sadly, it’s that demographic of editors who always seem to have the most opinions on the subject. A group who couldn’t even name a new model (from any recent season no less) if held at gun-point but think they know what quantifies their notability. Manifestly, not. The point of saying which shows a model does IS THAT IT’S WHAT AMERICAN VOGUE PROFILED. Duh! It’s what VOGUE spotlighted as notability. {{xt|Spring 2017 was Faretta’s first full ready-to-wear season, and she came on like gangbusters, opening three shows (Victoria Beckham, Roberto Cavalli, and Mugler) and closing one (Chloé). She wore key looks like Saint Laurent’s bustier top and Céline’s Yves Klein–inspired dress. What made Faretta right for each of the distinct brands that cast her? There’s nothing saccharine about her; rather, she communicates an innate strength combined with an air of fresh-scrubbed healthiness. It’s a winning combo.}} If they take notice the model is doing something right. The cover of British Vogue under the latent editorialship of Edward Enninful? My God, do your research. But since you don’t know fashion I wouldn’t expect you to understand. And then yet another Vogue? The point of all these sources is that people who want to read more about the model |can go there to do so. If you don’t like the coverage: . If you don’t like the way the article is written then re-write it. It’s that simple. If I was writing this article for so-called PR then I’d include the mindless minutiae of Victoria Beckham’s Instagram photo. Questioning the legitimacy of models.com’s well-respected-for-20 years-and-regularly-updated "Top 50" list? Blithe ignorance. That’s that on that
— User:Trillfendi, 03:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:NNC (Wikipedia:Notability)