Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Informed Consent (website) (2nd nomination)
it certainly ''appears'' notable, given the large member count and how decisive the previous AFD was.  That said, the sourcing IS very poor, and I can't find much better either (there's http://www.newstatesman.com/nma/nma2008/entry/200805070004 this, but it isn't much) and may not pass .  I'd probably be leaning toward delete if better sources can't be found by the end of AFD
— User:Starblind, 21:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)