Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wreathgate (2nd nomination)
but probably change the name. There is clearly plentiful coverage that satisfies notability and . It isn't an evident attack page, though I'm sure it might get some edits that move that way, they should be handled in-article. It is a significant enough event that it is a legitimate CONTENTFORK. Amazingly this isn't a pile-on !vote, given the number of delete/redirect !votes, most of which I would say are at best over-reacting and I believe unjustified. I would say the only thing that I am unsure about is what is a good alternate name
— User:Nosebagbear, 21:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LASTING (Wikipedia:Notability)