Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andersen Corporation
Dear {{u|Eóin}} and others: A) I think that the aforementioned Star Tribune sources don't meet , and may not meet  either, and therefore Andersen is non-notable. B) Even if Andersen were notable, I think that, per , it would be best to delete or stubify or draftify the article and then possibly start over. ❧ What are your thoughts on both points
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:AUD||WP:NOTFORPROMOTION (Wikipedia:Notability)