Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalit Lives Matter
but with no prejudice to recreation should real life resources and media sources become available. Aman kumar goel is right that it is not an international movement, but wrong that it shows no signs of becoming one. As for the nominator's arguments, let this be deleted for the right reasons. I cannot imagine why Wikipedia would have an interest in concerning itself with the promotion of an agenda by the subject of an article, in the world outside of that article. There is no promotion within the article, nor in its choice of words. Is the nominator attempting to invoke ? There is no sign of the article seeking to align itself with BLM in any way. The purported movement itself, with its name, yes, but not the article. The problem is that it is not a movement. At this point it is little more than a Facebook meme, as the link in TheList article shows. The Communist Party article confirms this when it says, "there should be" such a movement. It should be a movement, it should have received more coverage, but only one of those things concern Wikipedia and neither of those things are true at this time
— User:Anarchangel, 03:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)