Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kapoustin
As one of the editors that has been accused of libel and had my ability and professionalism maligned by the subject of the article, I shall only point out the subject has been given numerous opportunities to provide  | verifiable substance to the article to counter any statements that were believed to be inaccurate.  I am not sure how this would fit as a  violation since the current text appears to be adequately sourced.  As has been pointed out, the talk page has deteriorated to threats and borderline  |uncivil comments followed by some "interesting" further allegations in a RPP.  Unfortunately, the subject and the original creator have chosen to "attack a straw man" rather than providing  | verifiable substance
— User:Ttonyb1, 15:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:BLP||WP:CIVIL||WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)