Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race and intelligence (4th nomination)
The article passes  (it is very notable with a very large body of research attention given to it and many books written, many of which are well referenced in the article), it also passes . The delete votes seem weak to me, but understandable as this article is controversial, offensive to some, and attracts drama, and these seem to be the reasons behind the delete votes — but Wikipedia is OTCENSORED. I am not convinced the article’s existence is undue given it passes . Further, if this article is deleted then people interested, even with good intentions, will search out other sources of information on this topic which will likely lead to exposure to heavily biased extremist white supremacy websites: why not let those interested have access to a much more balanced summary of academic debate and evidence on Wikipedia? Finally, many Wikipedia sub articles depend, to varying degrees, on the existence of this article
— User:Literaturegeek, 08:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)