Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freakum Dress (3rd nomination)
Just so we are clear, i was asked to comment http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AL-l-CLK-l-l&action=historysubmit&diff=407345489&oldid=406793139 here. With that said it was a neutral comment asking for opinion, wasnt a canvas violation. Okay, so back to this article,  has been cited for the deletion, although i agree with this rule i also disagree due to inconsistency on wikipedia. What i mean is, according to , "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." Charting is not ''always'' a necessity in establishing notability, in this case, this is a well written article that has received a fair amount of coverage. Im leaning more towards keep but not enough to say keep
— User:L, 23:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NSONG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)