Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Dekkers(brian D)
Absolutely nothing there to show notability, so far as I can see. When tweets are given as a ref, it means one of two things: either the author hasn't read , or there is nothing better. (Possibly both, mind you.) One of the two main editors of the article (if they're not one and the same...) blanked this discussion page - also not a good sign. I'm now expecting a flock of sockpuppets to appear singing the praises of the subject of the article. Take my advice - don't bother. Spend your time finding some solid references to show something more than that this chap has been trying to promote a record. (Look at  and  too while you're at it
— User:Peridon, 15:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:SPAM (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)