Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Iqbal Singh
The argument from #C3 seems rather weak to me.  The inclusionary guidelines at  are usually meant to be used in case there is something of scholarly notability to be said about the subject and their work, which might otherwise fall on the wrong side of WP:GNG.  One should usually expect to see some reasonably high citations on the subject's work or, at least, something on which to base an encyclopedia article other than membership in a society ().  In this case, however, the poor citation numbers fail to bear this out.  (Also, the sources in the article are rather poor.  One of which, discussing her research, says this: "The s include peredbation theory for line operators sic"  which is obvious nonsense.)  Indeed, the subject appears ''only'' to be notable as a member of a scientific body
— User:Sławomir, 23:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:NOTDIRECTORY (Wikipedia:Notability)