Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMBnet.journal
I've added a secondary ref from a reliable publisher in the field. The main question in my mind is whether EMBnet.journal is different enough from EMBnet.news to be considered a new journal. If so, this may be a case of  unless we can find another secondary source. If it isn't a new journal, then EMBnet.news does have a lot of history behind it and secondary sources such as http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/S6/S1 and http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/22487/InTech-Concepts_historical_milestones_and_the_central_place_of_bioinformatics_in_modern_biology_a_european_perspective.pdf; in this case, the article should be kept
— User:Mark, 21:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)