Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global warming conspiracy theory (3rd nomination)
Bad faith nomination. 86.** has done no editing, no discussion, or any attempts of improving the article in question. He asserts that it is a  fork, but when examined, the content that he is referring to is not similar. When stating that the article is a BLP violation, he doesn't give examples, but instead asserts that because people are named, it ''must'' be a violation, no matter whether references support the namings. In fact it seems as if 86.**'s nominations is purely based upon . Finally the hatted part is simply unacceptable, it ignores  and casts aspersions at his fellow editors. It is not a particularly good article, it could do with a lot of improvement, which hopefully will ensue from this nomination
— User:KimDabelsteinPetersen, 21:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POV||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)