Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthera
In my opinion, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. The https://www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/news/ccg-healthera-app-prescriptions-pharmacies Chemist and Druggist reference is not in-depth and there is no evidence of ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject'' as is required as per . The reasoning provided by Siliu.3310 and supported by Bondegezou is not based on policies or guidelines and, in fact, is contrary to  guidelines. References that are based on company announcements (such as funding announcements) may be used to support facts or information within the article (so long as they are from reliable sources, etc) but are not counted towards meeting the criteria for establishing notability and fail . Blog posts are not considered reliable sources and shouldn't be used for any reason. A listing on an apps site does not provide any in-depth information on the company and fails . The criteria for notability is fairly strict for companies/organizations. This topic fails GNG and 
— User:HighKing, 17:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)