Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fandom Wank (2nd nomination)
Not ''a single'' reference from anything even remotely close to a |reliable source. The article asserts a good deal of notability, and this is supported by "Fandom Wank" getting almost 300,000 Google hits, with (exactly) 500 of the first 1,000 hits being unique, but again, all of the hits I saw were message board posts and blogs. In addition, and what ''really'' convinces me that this is insignificant, is that it's hosted on a freeweb service that itself is not notable enough (FYI: Alexa rank of 63,593) to have its own WP article
— User:Kicking222, 15:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)