Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle (company)
Mainly because I found plenty more sources which show that coverage isn't restricted to the two rounds of funding that all the current RS present in the article stem from: e.g. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/11/ex-jpmorgan-executive-to-join-circle-a-digital-currency-start-up/ Dec 14 http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/09/29/bitbeat-allaires-circle-releases-bitcoin-wallet/ Sep 14 http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/10/31/the-biggest-bitcoin-investment-so-far-circle-raises-9-million/ Oct 13. If these aren't sufficient to meet  then we need to delete hundreds of thousands of articles. While I understand the sentiment of the !deletes with regards to discouraging promotional editing, the article has been cleaned up and this isn't the place for argue for exceptions from well-established guidelines. Deleting articles purely because of them being the result of PE has never been policy and for good reason as we'd be spiting ourselves. There are plenty of good sources available which could be used to write a neutral and informative article
— User:Smartse, 22:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)