Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vegans
sourcing track record seems solid and the list is well maintained considering unsourced and nn material tend to be purged in reasonable time, nothing "unwieldy" about it. We should be encouraging lists which demonstrate such strong supports ,  - definitely has |featured list potential. Groupings and order are generally good, definitely not wiktionary:indiscriminate. Said groupings/ordering cannot be achieved as effectively under the wiki software's rather primitive category system, further justifying a list approach. Of course any list is "potentially endless" (OTPAPER, ), but that is not a deletion criterion. In fact, there appears to be no valid deletion criterion claimed for this AfD
— User:Dl2000, 22:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:N||WP:FL||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:SPLIT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)