Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EWay
Fails . There is a smokescreen of sources in the article, but they are either not RS or routine coverage. A search for sources shows a lot of PR but hardly any significant RS. Many of the RS I found are routine news which seem to be redressed press releases. If the SMH source is the best we have, then I'm afraid I have to go with a delete. From what I see, the company is marginally notable and exactly in what we call  territory. It is an emerging company and maybe in 3-5 years there might be better coverage. But till that time, I will go with a delete
— User:Lemongirl942, 09:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)