Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DinuraCreations (2nd nomination)
same reasons that applied in 2015 apply today: there is absolutely no evidence it meets the general guideline of  in sourcing. Google News turns up exactly zero sources for me, and I don't see any claim to it in the article. Salting should apply because this is the third creation of the series of articles, and the creator has not provided us with any reason to expect it would be notable in the future. Any future creations would likely simply be a waste of further time
— User:TonyBallioni, 15:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)