Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto Valley (2nd nomination)
Strong''') term is good enough for two BBC articles, ''Business Insider'' and 1/4M Ghits but not good enough for a redirect? Really?! We ''follow'' sources not ''ignore'' them and assist readers finding content with redirects. This AfD is understandable given the last one (note that one delete !vote Ilyina Olya Yakovna is now a blocked sock which wasn't recognised at the time) and the usual whack a mole of crypto, but trying to force a delete when there's a merge underway and  is questionable. Usage in sources isn't that obscure and we can fix that now per -M 
— User:Widefox, 13:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD||WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)