Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 10 artists with the most number-ones on the U.S. Hot 100
How is this even being nominated? There is no info anywhere else about which songs made by an artist actually hit number one, and the chart facts and records that came with them. Absurd to nominate. List of artists by number of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles and List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones#Most number-one singles are the same thing; the former is just a list of when every number one in the last 57 years, year by year, the latter just says how many number ones per artist, '''not''' a detailed account of each artists set of number-ones. So you've kinda tripped yourself up there. It's really irrelevant if another artist gets 13 (I believe only two artists have 12, anyway) and that info would be removed and added. Out of everyone on this list, only a few of them are active, and only one actually still has number-ones. So there's another point you've messed up on. You could say exactly the same for the milestones article about adding and removing info all the time. *Double standards*. No one is saying that this list will be created for all charts, so I don't know why you are talking about things that haven't happened/won't happen (). The list only works when everyone has had double figures, because there are less artists to include, meaning that it won't be as long as a chart where lots of people have had a lot of number-ones, or a new chart which hasn't had enough artists with the most number ones yet. I'm completely baffled as to why this would even be nominated for deletion... &nbsp;—&nbsp
— User:Calvin999, 08:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)