Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civilization Fanatics Center (2nd nomination)
Found no coverage in a reliable source on which to base notability claim per , let alone significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. It's won no major awards or met other website-specific criteria described in  to suggest notability. Individual forum posts have been referenced in a few books/papers, but these aren't sufficient for a presumption of notability. The previous AfD was closed incorrectly, in my opinion: the arguments for deletion cited policy, the arguments for keep essentially boiled down to "it's popular" with no sources cited or indication why that should be sufficient; while it's technically correct that a "consensus" wasn't reached, the closer should have considered the strength of the arguments, not just a vote count. One respondant in the 2006 AfD suggested that the game publisher's link to the fan site conferred a quasi-official status, which I'd dispute, and in the context of an AfD, point out that notability is not inherited from sites that link to a site
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)