Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Press (3rd nomination)
per my reasons in the last AfD; nothing has changed since it was closed as "no consensus" yesterday.  Dealing with the nominator's specific points: (1)  doesn't apply as Howard Press isn't a living person. (A) The policies about notability of perpetrators cited refer to 1E which doesn't apply as the man's criminal notability stretches across multiple events and prosecutions even before we take into account his claims as an inventor.  They're also intended to address the question of whether it's appropriate for an article to be about the perpetrator, the victim, the crime itself or something different, rather than the question of whether Wikipedia should cover it at all.  There's no suitable alternate article in this case. (B) As above, he's not notable only for one event.  (C) The relevant policy statement for articles about the deceased is that they should be verifiable and well sourced; this article is (at least in relation to the potentially defamatory claims).  (D) The need for privacy applies only to the biographies of living persons (Howard Press is deceased); the "victim" clause (those impacted by another's actions) isn't relevant here as the claims of duress made by the nominator within the article are unsourced
— User:DustFormsWords, 03:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)