Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Stella
People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they have not won — people need to ''win'' the election and thereby ''hold'' office to pass , and otherwise they have to already have had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten them an article on those other grounds anyway. The coverage shown is not enough to get her over  in ''lieu'' of having to pass NPOL, either — it just makes her a , not a person who has passed the |ten year test for enduring significance. It is not our job to keep an article about every single person who happens to show up in the current news cycle — we're writing the ''long'' view of history here, not the five-minute view of current newsiness, so GNG does ''not'' just count up the footnotes and keep anything that surpasses a certain arbitrary number, but rather it also tests for the ''context'' of what the person is getting coverage ''for''. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in November 2020 if she wins, but nothing here adds up to a reason why she would already qualify to keep an article today. Also, sourcing anything to Facebook or Twitter is always a hard no
— User:Bearcat, 14:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Notability)