Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Sidney Hyman
Fails  even allowing for citation counts probably being generally lower in the past. (The point of  is that we need to be able to write about academics who have demonstrable influence even when biographical coverage is spotty, but there still has to be demonstrable influence.) As written, the article is one long failure of , which requires secondary or tertiary sources that evaluate the claims made in primary ones. The assertions about his solving Gulf War syndrome are pure . The "systemic coccal disease" material is also extremely dubious. (The closest thing I can find to a genuinely independent, third-party evaluation is a brief comment by https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(11)63058-9/fulltext Sartin (2000), which lists it among proposed explanations for GWS that {{tq|remain hypothetical and have not been demonstrated in appropriate test populations using standard microbiological techniques}}. Most mentions of it are by G. L. and N. L. Nicolson, who coauthored with Hyman and shouldn't be considered independent experts
— User:XOR, 21:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:MEDRS||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Notability)