Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Gay Musical (2nd nomination)
per |multiple in-depth reviews being available. For example, one of the many |easily found sources available to improve the article is a quite decent full-legth review and analysis in http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941896?refcatid=31 ''Variety''... and we have significant coverage in http://www.afterelton.com/movies/2009/10/big-gay-musical-review Afer Elton and http://www.newyorkcool.com/archives/2009/September/film-reviews.htm#gay ''New York Cool'' and http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/biggaymusical.php DVD Verdict and http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/42963/big-gay-musical-the/ DVD Talk and http://www.theatermania.com/new-york-city/news/09-2009/the-big-gay-musical-to-get-nyc-premiere-on-septemb_15955.html ''Theater Mania'' and http://www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/reviews.php?id=9227 ''Eye for Film'' and http://thisweekintexas.com/index.php?Itemid=95&id=261&option=com_content&task=view ''Twit Magazine'' and http://www.shadowsonthewall.co.uk/10/i2.htm#bigg Rich Cline and http://www.outimpact.com/entertainment/movies/dvd-reviews/small-review-ithe-big-gay-musicali/ ''Out Impact'' and http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1332100/externalreviews others. We expect such sources, even the less-than-mainstream ones, to review films or genre-specific topics... and the ones I listed by name are '''not''' simply capsule reviews '''nor''' trivial mentions, but are instead in-depth and significant coverage of this film.   and  are soundly met and |addressable issues of an article |needing improvement are rarely sufficient cause for deletion of notable topics, despite their subject matter
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 01:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:FILM||WP:ATD||WP:UGLY (Wikipedia:Notability)