Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John H. Stamler (2nd nomination)
There was basically a consensus to delete the first time (especially if you discount the wikilawyering and  arguments). There is nothing particularly notable about his career. And the resurrection of the New York Times obit = automatic notability argument is really aggravating. That has been shot down as a claim to notability in so many other deletion discussions. The second New York Times article doesn't really help much, it is about a new police academy that just happens to be named after him. Having a building named after you is not auto-notability either (especially since that building would not meet notability standards for its own article
— User:Rusf10, 03:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)