Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budget range
as unsourced .  I wouldn't be opposed to keeping this if there was sourcing (and given a better name, such as Pricing and video games suggested in the nom), but as it stands, there's so many statements that fail , I don't see how keeping it makes any sense.  I've marked up the article where citations are needed.  The result is an ugly citation-needed-bomb-run, but that's because we really do need sources for all these statements.  Merging this into some other article doesn't eliminate the need for sources; merging solves , the problem we have here is 
— User:RoySmith, 16:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:V||WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:No original research)