Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ouma Rusks
Every single source is either a negligible mention that doesn't even repeat "ouma" more than once, a primary source, or a press release. The only one that ''might'' not be a puff piece is http://www.mweb.co.za/Entrepreneur/ViewArticle/tabid/3162/Article/8847/Ouma-Rusks-and-Simba-Chips-Roaring-success-steeped-in-tradition.aspx mweb. Wikipedia doesn't care about what a company does, what it makes, or where it's made -- only that there exists significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. I agree with {{u|Cartney23}} that it may deserve mention at rusk but in no way passes . --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 23:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)