Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overunity
Google is, of couse, riddled with false positives, but it doesn't look like the necessary coverage is out there. The "credibility" sentence practically serves as proof that this article is |unencyclopedic, anyways. As a side note, does anybody else find it odd that about half of the external links have nothing to do with overunity but instead deal with physics in general
— User:Chris, 22:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SOAP (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)