Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Nathan
This is a borderline A7 qualifier. He runs a large church, which confers more innate notability than city councilman how exactly? 1 trivial gnews hit, he was quoted along with multiple other people. Ghit total isn't that impressive, especially once you factor out websites his church owns. Hits are mostly things showing up for sale at various Christian bookstores, or other people named Rich Nathan. If Ghits amounted to notability, we wouldn't be deleting many pornstars, and most of those deletions had wider name recognition than this articles subject. Unless someone finds enough  to establish significant coverage, this has no valid reason to remain that I can see
— User:Horrorshowj, 19:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)