Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linguistics (poststructural)
based on http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=post.structural.linguistics google scholar there might be enough for a |fringe topic. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linguistics_(poststructural)&oldid=232732427 Right now the page is a bit better after I removed several chunks of |content forks, but there's still very little evidence of interest beyond the 70s. This AFD is being approached like a |battle when it's a matter of the sources not indicating notability. There's space on wikipedia for even minority positions, but they must be sourced. This is not. If there are sources to demonstrate interest in the page, it should be obvious to demonstrate contemporary interest. Discussion should also focus on the deletion of the page; discussion of the page's contents should be on that talk page
— User:WLU, 18:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:CFORK||WP:BATTLE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)