Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carnism
per nomination. I believe this is clearly not what wiki intended per . "wiki is not a dictionary". The article is a primary sourced article by the author and coiner of the phrase, which thus counts as original research  per  - it could easily have been "omnivorism". The author is attempting to introduce a political ideology out of something so universal, and automatic that it does not involve choice at all. The introduction of choice into the consumption of meat is, I suspect, with the agenda of eradicating the human consumption of meat.  soapbox. "Carnism" scores 121 unique Ghits out of about 459. The saying does not appear to have gained widespread usage, and the originator herself would probably be excluded from wiki for not being sufficiently notable. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Dr+Melanie+Joy%22&hl=en&hs=sDH&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&start=10&sa=N 14 unique hits out of 26 for "Dr Melanie Joy", a name shared by another physician in the United Kingdom. No relevant Amzhits for Melanie Joy
— User:Ohconfucius, 06:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:OR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)