Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LocalBitcoins
Couldn't establish notability ( or ), despite being an important company. I spot-checked several established English-language news sites with reputations for fact-checking for coverage of "BTC-e" . All I found was incidental coverage, quoting a price from them, mentioning that BitStamp and BTC-e are the highest volume exchanges when covering some other subject, on rare occasion printing a sentence from a spokesperson, or something similar. The number of mentions, and the repetition that it's one of the largest exchanges, absolutely establishes that it's an important company, but that's different than being a ''notable'' company as Wikipedia defines it. It's rare to have such a wide difference between the two, but the requirement for significant coverage from these types of sources is so that there is verifiable information about a subject on which to base an article
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)