Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama on Twitter
because this is what Wikipedia is . Wikipedia is DIARY, CASE study, and DIRECTORY. This is not a simple issue of notability. The fact is, for any major public figure, you're going to be able to assemble sources about a myriad of subtopics. Barack Obama's appearances in Ohio. Justin Bieber's live performances. Lindsay Lohan's substance abuse issues. Those would all technically be sourceable. The problem is, you're starting to get into topic selections that resemble the biases of the editor. You're starting to confuse "the subject" with "what the subject is notable for". It's your standard  problem where people can write multiple articles that are all basically about the same thing, which would make the encyclopedia even more unmanageable than it already is. (Note: this is a copy-and-paste comment that I also posted at the similar Bieber article. Everything I said there applies equally here
— User:Shooterwalker, 15:46, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOTDIARY||WP:NOTCASE||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:CONTENTFORK (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)