Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Romanelli (2nd nomination)
Nothing here (or in the pre-blanking version from 2013 either) constitutes a substantive  pass, and no |reliable source coverage at all has been cited in ''either'' version. And the blanking was actually semi-justified, as well, since the pre-blanking version contained both an |advertorial slant and some unsourced  issues. A writer is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists — reliable source coverage which verifies a proper claim of notability (rather than mere existence) must be present to ''support'' one, but nothing remotely like that has ever been shown in ''any'' version of this article all the way back to its original creation
— User:Bearcat, 16:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:RS||WP:NOTADVERT||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)