Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barracuda atomic
I see no particular evidence of notability myself. I removed the speedy tags because this was not without context, and does not fit the quite narrow confines of #A7. Therefore it should have wider community consensus for deletion. I don't quite agree with "when have a cheap full suspension bicycle ever became notable" -- "Schwinn" is sufficient answer. But that is perhaps covered under "retrospective culture" and is surely a somewhat exceptional case. Unless sources indicate some particular notability for '''this'''  bike (and there might be printed sources not on the web for all i know) it should probably be deleted
— User:DESiegel, 20:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)