Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Driessen (lobbyist)
The article makes him out to be a non-notable fossil-fuel apologist (note: those are two separate things — it is entirely possible to be a notable fossil-fuel apologist, but there is no evidence here that he is one). He is certainly not notable for the originality of his ideas — they appear to be whatever is most expedient for his corporate sponsors. The one source in the current version of the article (the Mother Jones piece) mentions him but is not sufficiently in-depth in its coverage of him for ; anyway that's only one and its neutrality on this subject is questionable. We also don't have evidence of sufficient academic impact (per Xxanthippe's comment above) nor the multiple published book reviews that might allow a pass of 
— User:David, 07:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)