Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wind and Water: Puzzle Battles
I disagree that notability has been established in this case, a pity since it looks interesting. Listed in the article is an interview, which is useful for development but not for reception (which is the part where notability gets demonstrated), there's a short piece about the dreamcast release http://www.destructoid.com/a-new-dreamcast-game-wind-and-water-puzzle-battles-97560.phtml here, but what is needed is a couple of full-size reviews from |reliable sources. Being nominated for an IGF award is no basis for an article - "it was the running for an IGF award" so? Where's the reception information coming from? Nah, no prejudice against restoring the article if reviews show up in the future, but trying to build a broad and neutral article out of dribs and drabs doesn't work, I've tried
— User:Someone, 01:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)