Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Dahlene
The question of broken links was not my main concern, and yes they all work now. My main point was that the "sources" are trivial, passing mentions, in several cases only name drops, in others offering only a sentence or so with no substance. ''Substantial'' sourcing is required to support a separate article, not just "the guy got mentioned here or there." If you could show me a source that goes into substantial depth ''about the man, not the team'', I would agree that a separate article on the man rather than a brief mention in the team's article is warranted. Otherwise, we should |follow our sources' lead, and do as they do, mentioning him only briefly in context of the team
— User:Seraphimblade, 07:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)