Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Charvériat
The citations above represent fairly, proportionately and without bias, significant views, published by reliable sources on the topic. "The neutral point of view does not mean exclusion of certain points of view, but including all verifiable points of view which have sufficient due weight", per . While naturally having our own points of view, the goal is improving Wikipedia content in good faith. Finally, arguments have been given on both sides of this issue. The preponderance of evidence supports |notability, and more particularly rtist, i.e., the person who is the topic of a biographical article is worthy of notice, remarkable or significantly interesting enough for a written account of that person's life be recorded within Wikipedia
— User:Coldcreation, 21:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:YESPOV||WP:BIO||WP:A (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)