Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Respawn Entertainment
having notable founders is not sufficient for the company to meet . The company has not been subject to coverage by independent |reliable sources (in fact, the article simply cites one article mentioning its founding. Up to this point, speculation of the company going to "be big" is simply |crystal balling. Until such evidence showing that it can "stand on its own two feet" and satisfy Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for |verifiability and |corporate notability, this article should wait and be a non-presence here (suggestion to those who wish this article maintained: please resist to speculate on how big the company will be, but please add evidence of the company's significance - cited, of course - to the article. Arguments of the "more notable than X" variety generally become more reasons to delete both topics than reasons to save either
— User:B, 03:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:RS||WP:CBALL||WP:V||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)