Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code page 293
Even the original version of the article was sourced with a top reliable reference (although badly formatted), showing that the nominator did neither attempt to do his homework (per ) before nominating the article for deletion, nor made any (even trivial) attempts to improve the article (by formatting the given source correctly) as would have been his duty before nominating the article for deletion. If the nominator really was uncapable of identifying or reformatting the given source himself, he could have asked for sources via our established article improvement procedures instead of asking for deletion. This has been explained to the nominator several times already, therefore this must be seen as unconstructive behaviour
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)