Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Problems of Onomastics
selective merge) to Russian Language Institute. Contrary to Randykitty's assertion, some editors like myself do consider Worldcat holdings as contributing evidence toward notability. But in my opinion, Worldcat holdings are not quite enough by themselves to establish notability, as libraries can carry journals for many reasons other than importance. Other evidence toward notability is a mention of the journal in the article http://nevtan.arts.unideb.hu/nevtan/tagozat/06hajdu.pdf The History of Onomastics. I've also seen it claimed that the journal is indexed in the Russian Science Citation Index and was one of the approved journals by the Higher Attestation Commission of the Soviet Union, but I wasn't able to verify either claim--my Russian-fu is terrible. At this point, there isn't enough evidence of notability per  or ournals for this article to survive standalone. But basic facts about the journal are verifiable, and per  and , verifiable information should be preserved, not deleted. The journal is sponsored by the Russian Language Institute--it would make sense to selectively merge a mention of the journal in that article. The topic is a plausible search term, so a redirect is warranted, too
— User:Mark, 18:43, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NJ||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Notability)