Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional films in Seinfeld
I'm not going to rehash the same point any more:  does not prohibit what you are describing. Rather, you seem to have a novel interpretation of the original research policy that no one else seems to share (for example: of the ten "delete" votes so far, only two mention original research: yours and the one by Angus McLellan who dubbed it "per Motor." In fact, your original vote didn't even mention original research, it appeared as an objection in later comments). Your interpreation would delete the great majority of material at :Category:Dynamic lists, lists to which "revisions and additions are welcome," meaning that they aren't already listed at some exterior source as belonging to that list, they just need to verifiably meet the criteria. Should this type of material qualify as original research, I should think that one of the other Special:Statistics|1,602,256 editors would have pointed it out by now and deleted it straightaway.We seem to be talking past each other: I can't understand why you don't see it my way, and I'm guessing that you feel likewise. This argument is sapping my time and energy, and I think it's time to call it to an end. Feel free to take the last word, but I've made my points several times and I am done repeating them
— User:Kane5187, 22:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)