Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Byrne (centenarian)
Does  not apply here?  The subject seems to only be notable for one event - dying at 108 years old.  The coverage seems to only cover this one even.  I don't see how that establishes notability per .  I could be convinced that this case is fundamentally different but it seems to me that picking an arbitrary number (at what age does one become notable?) isn't something that Wikipedia has ever done but if we're covering what humans consider notable, represented by significant and independent coverage from reliable sources, there has been some coverage.  Still, that coverage verges on non-significant as it only covers her age.  As an example, I've seen longer obituaries but that doesn't make a person notable, even though it can be covered in several reliable and independent sources.  What's the difference?  Again, it seems to be an arbitrary number.  At least the references used in the article aren't in the obituary section.  That at least leaves the door open for an argument
— User:OlYeller21, 05:08, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)