Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman
Agree with {{u|EAWH}}. Subject’s work, thought leadership, and impact are confirmed by multiple independent and credible secondary sources that meet Wikipedia’s criteria for such sources. In context, subject’s tweets are as easily read as self-deprecating and humorous. The potential for a page on Wikipedia to boost one’s professional credibility and opportunities is well-understood. To {{u|Bender235}}'s reference to , note that it states, "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." Subject cannot held responsible by association for the actions of individuals associated with the subject. Black Birders Week, as noted in the https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/03/us/black-birders-week-black-in-stem-christian-cooper-scn-trnd/index.html cited CNN coverage, is a timely and comprehensively organized and programmed “series of events and activities designed to highlight Black scientists, scholars and everyday nature lovers. While spreading their joy and knowledge, the countless people involved in the movement are also raising visibility of Black achievement at a painfully critical time.”  To the allegation of meatpuppetry, I'm a longtime if infrequent Wikipedia editor
— User:Ejgertz, 23:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ANYBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)