Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apocrypha (fiction)
to canon (fiction) without merge. That article is already tagged as being under-referenced and possibly containing original research, so I don't see any value in merging in still more completely unsourced information that may constitute more original research. The term clearly is used, though; I was quickly able to find two examples with a few minutes of searching https://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/moviesandtv/11653-Star-Wars-Apocrypha-The-Expanded-Universe-Canon-and-Religious-Myhttps://www.syfy.com/syfywire/star-trek-apocrypha-major-canon-facts-that-were-silently-ignored. However, it's only ever used in contrast with the concept of canon, so should be discussed in the same article to avoid  problems
— User:Lowercaserho, 08:20, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:REDUNDANTFORK (Wikipedia:Content forking)