Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafed.net (2nd nomination)
I don't think you can argue that the quotes in books are "non-trivial"; they give a passing mention to one of a number of sites they are describing. The Alexa and Google rankings are immaterial - as I've said before, popularity is not equal to notability. It's harder for me to judge the seestani.com review, but I'm worried by both its independence and reliability. You say that "close relations and being allies" isn't the same as dependence and that might be true, but it certainly does not encourage ''in''dependence. You also say that reliability is not an issue (interestingly the primary notability criterion on  recently had reliability added to it) but I can't agree with that. By that logic, if ''I'' reviewed a website and posted it to my personal blog or homepage, that would qualify as a source - clearly absurd. So I'm still going to support deletion
— User:Trebor, 13:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)