Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annick Press
This particular publisher seems to have established a strong list of award winning authors.   is a guideline that outlines for us that just because X is associated with Y, and Y is notable, then X by mere association is not notable.  In the case of a publisher, it's notability is linked to the publications that it puts out, and the publisher isn't merely associated to the books and authors, having a stronger relationship and hand in the production of the book.  It's difficult to tell how deep the coverage is as the articles are behind pay walls, but http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/thestar/access/470463031.html?dids=470463031:470463031&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Apr+08%2C+1989&author=Kathy+English+Toronto+Star&pub=Toronto+Star&desc=The+big+boom+in+children%27s+publishing+Canadians+are+making+their+mark+at+home+and+abroad+with+books+that+kids+love&pqatl=google, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/thestar/access/474648991.html?dids=474648991:474648991&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+13%2C+1985&author=Sherie+Posesorski+Special+to+The+Star&pub=Toronto+Star&desc=How+storyteller+Munsch+keeps+his+audience+spellbound&pqatl=google appear to indicate that they are notable enough to attract some press attention,and especially in the second abstract, it's clear that the success of Robert Munsch is being told framed with how it was achieved through this publisher
— User:Whpq, 16:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)