Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giapo
Certainly there are less notable articles that this floating around WP but IMHO most of those should be removed. Ideally notability should be established by some solid |secondary sources. A short mention in one magazine does not qualify. And from what's been offered there is no good reason to think that will change. Whether it has the largest cone or the largest ball of yarn is not really relevant
— User:Mcorazao, 23:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:secondary source (Wikipedia:No original research)