Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Boyett-Compo (2nd nomination)
I searched pretty hard for anything that could justify keeping Boyett-Compo on here, but it seems that she's on the very cusp of what Wikipedia would consider to be notable. She has a lot of ghits, but not of anything that would be considered reliable sources. (Ghits aren't enough to justify notability, after all.) She's been nominated for awards but hasn't won anything big just yet and most of the awards are sort of "minor" as far as wikipedia guidelines go. http://www.authorsden.com/visit/author.asp?id=16985, http://www.authorsden.com/visit/author.asp?id=214, http://www.windlegends.org/promo.html Nor has any of her books hit the NYT or any of the big bestseller listings. The only thing that would potentially give her enough to stay is if I knew what type of profile she got in the Writer's Digest Publishing Success entry, although it sounds sort of like it was more of a brief entry where she was mentioned along with other authors. I can't find the actual article- the only mentions of it refer back to sites the author has put this info on. At this moment she just isn't notable enough to warrant an article. She might be in the future but then she might not be and keeping the article on the idea that she might be is a  no-no
— User:Tokyogirl79, 06:01, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)