Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldini & Castoldi
bad nom,  failure. We don't consider a topic as non notable just because it is poorly sourced, but only if reliable sources does not exist. Article still needs a bit of cleanup (and probably copyedit), but I can assume the nominator's concerns about the lack of notability of this 120 years old publishing house were addressed, so a withdrawal is suggested
— User:Cavarrone, 06:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)