Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bear versus bull
per violation of , , and the limits of common sense. The main problem with this article is that it discusses an actual conflict between a bear and a bull, whereas the only place where "bear vs. bull" has any notability is in political cartoons (bear market, bull market). The references reflect this: the verification for the claim that "the topic of bear vs. bull is popular" comes from two sources, which, respectively, are "Investopedia" and amazon.com. Other attempts at verification fail miserably; reports of bears attacking bull bison (which are just male bison, not actual bulls) are used as proof of bear vs. bull conflicts, and Native American folk tales are cited as factual sources. This article may also violate , since I doubt that instances of bears fighting bulls are broadly supported by any sort of reputable scholarship. As has been stated above, this article is useless. Anyone who wants to compare bears and bulls can look at the separate articles and do so on their own time
— User:Colonel, 00:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:No original research)