Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey L. Bass (2nd nomination)
Not a single one of the deletion advocates has offered as their rationale "I don't know what this is about, but in my opinion this isn't worthy". So you're conveniently ignoring the arguments people have actually made, in favor of dismissing an argument that no one has made. Excellent example of a straw man, actually. The reason why this does not meet the standard is that the standard is "a topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."  No one has offered any indication that this person has received significant coverage in any |reliable source that is independent of him.  That would pretty much be why
— User:Mwelch, 16:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)