Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (2nd nomination)
When I read this nomination and the article I was sure that somewhere in there must be a notable subject. One or two contributors above have suggested that |reliable sources existed, and I thought that a Google search must reveal at least one objective piece from an independent source to go along with the multitude of walled garden references between conspiracy sites. Sadly, after 15 pages of Google hits the references to Griffin started to run out and there were still no independent source. None of the '''keep''' contributions above have produced evidence to assert that the article passes , nor have the promised references appeared in the article itself. It's a shame because I think he's an interesting-sounding subject
— User:Kim, 09:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)