Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1996 in Australian television
I am not sure in the nomination the point of the comment ''The pages for *Year* in Australian television all do not seem to include an article. They are merely lists that provide little or no notable content. Pages have already been deleted before because of their consisting of only a template with broken links to uncreated pages. Most pages also seem to need references and most can be considered stubs.''  Red links and stubs are both OK on Wikipedia and neither are reasons to delete.  Lists are also OK.  Note that notability guidelines do not limit content of lists except when it comes to people - see .  I have not been able to find a specific guidleline for television but there is a comprehensive wikiproject and perhaps they can shed more light
— User:Matilda, 23:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NNC (Wikipedia:Notability)