Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snyderman and Rothman (study) (2nd nomination)
The article satisfies the  criteria, because it has been the "subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience", as anyone can ascertain from Google Scholarhttp://scholar.google.fi/scholar?cites=16865081919986717421&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=2000&hl=enhttp://scholar.google.fi/scholar?hl=en&q=%22The+IQ+Controversy%2C+the+Media+and+Public+Policy%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0. It is not a POV fork of anything, it's an independent subject. There's been a good deal of work done on the article, and a variety of viewpoints from secondary sources are present in it
— User:Victor, 18:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NB (Wikipedia:Notability)