Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obligations in Freemasonry
per Blueboar and others and '''redirect''' to main Freemasonry article - without the alleged (and I've yet to see any proof it is accurate, or was/is used by any masonic body) obligations, nothing here that isn't covered allready in main article. As to the wisdom of including alleged obligations without any proof to it's accuracy... I feel that goes against , but others milage may vary
— User:WegianWarrior, 07:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)