Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzi Gablik
Passes  by having a substantial body of work reviewed in reliable publications. The article seemed to lack any sense of proportion or of ''why'' a person might be notable, but what matters is |whether sources exist, even if they weren't yet used. (Also, while I could probably give the Smithsonian https://www.aaa.si.edu/collections/suzi-gablik-papers-16176/more-information 12.8 linear feet of documents, they wouldn't bother to catalogue and archive them
— User:XOR, 22:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Notability)