Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf Mail (2nd nomination)
It's a badly made article, that needs some rewriting with proper formatting, particularly for references.  It has some highly misleading labels of "references", such as the "Rolling Stones" item, which is actually nothing of note.  But, I see some substantial coverage from independent sources.http://www.theaureview.com/interviews/wolf-mail-everywherehttps://rhythms.com.au/reviews/wolf-mail-above-the-influence/.  So, it clearly meets 
— User:Thivierr, 00:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)