Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SportsLogos.net
I'm hardly a neutral party in this having written the article, but I obviously disagree that it doesn't meet . I wouldn't have published it if I felt it wasn't going to meet . The content of the website—not only the logos themselves but their evolution—is sourced in the given reliable citations more than just trivial mentions, along with articles that talk about the site itself. That's on top of a significant number of Wikipedia articles that use the website as a reliable source (usually to reference logos) and the increasing number of other websites that reference sportslogos.net for anything logo-related and even uniform related. Is it overwhelming notability at this point? No, but there is definitely ongoing and widespread coverage across various media outlets and sports beyond a few trivial mentions here and there
— User:JonRidinger, 19:26, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEBCRIT||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)