Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water (data page)
I am not convinced that deletion is OK for reason of .  gives a nice background for this argument (concluding into 'keep' here, IMO). The data is quite structured. And this being water, such lots of data may be relevant. With this, I think the data is encyclopedic (while one could consider improvement of the page). Now for practical reasons, mostly web-originated, the data is not added to the main article. That is, we have not found a sound way to manage such a big page by web means. We could use improvements in this (i.e., high end webpage design guidelines
— User:DePiep, 13:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:DISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)