Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KOI-2194.03
KOIs should not be exempt from either  or . As a practical matter, if every candidate exoplanet receives an article without regard to GNG and NASTRO, then WP will be flooded with stubs about non-notable exoplanet candidates which needlessly duplicate catalog information. The problem with merging into a list is that I'm not sure that there's encyclopedic value in a list of objects which aren't sufficiently notable to warrant their own articles. On an unrelated note, a number of these KOI stubs contain very speculative statements about habitability. In the event that these articles are kept, I think that these statements should be removed unless substantiated by in-depth, peer-reviewed research
— User:Astro4686, 23:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NASTRO (Wikipedia:Notability)