Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Fosh
per nom and Bearcat's thorough analysis, and fully support  per Domeditrix observations. Also, and because this has come up in several AFD debates lately, the argument that social media followings, such as YouTube in this article, equates to  criterion: ''Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following'' needs to be revisited in my opinion. Frankly, I think the  policy guidelines should outline that social media followers ought not be considered to meet criterion #2 since the number of followers can be manipulated through the purchase of online websites. This is somewhat touched on in , but editors insistent on inclusion of these ''social media stars'' continue to point to, and rest their case solely on  criterion #2 whether SIGCOV in multiple RIS is available or not
— User:Megtetg34, 20:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SALT||WP:ENT||WP:ENT||WP:NYOUTUBE||WP:ENT (Wikipedia:Protection policy)