Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry d'Agier
I mostly agree with the nominator and Andrew Lenahan. No new sources have been presented during this AfD, and the subject doesn't qualify for a separate article by either  or , even though judging him just by the latter may be a little unfair given that a lot less press existed back then. He may have a certain claim to be a "part of the enduring historical record", but there's just not enough coverage of him to justify a separate article
— User:Pohta, 13:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN (Wikipedia:Notability)