Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubiquitous command and control
fairly strongly.  You mean that this sort of |complete bollocks has infected someone's military?  I blame PowerPoint, the death of literacy. Unlike some of the editors above, I am underwhelmed by this sort of writing.  I agree that it does seem to represent a lot of work, and share the sentiment that it's a shame to delete something that effort has been invested in.  But, having read through the whole thing, I feel like I know nothing that I didn't know at the beginning.  It seemed platitudinous, tautology (rhetoric)|tautological, and seeking to camouflage its emptiness with inappropriate abstractions.  The only military application I could imagine for this sort of prose would be to torment unlawful combatants with, but that would be a war crime.  In the end, this article really isn't ''about'' anything
— User:Ihcoyc, 14:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BOLLOCKS (Wikipedia:Complete bollocks)