Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unpopularity
The nomination is certainly bold as it's the first time I've seen the complaint that "It is excessively long, and essentially imparts only a dictionary definition", which seems to be self-contradictory.  The complaint that it's "like a sociology essay" seems rather different and is bizarre too, because that's the type of content we'd expect for this topic.  Finally the claim that it "does not provide encyclopedic content" is empty per .  So, there doesn't seem to be a case to answer here.  My impression is the nominator is expecting something else or something more but they don't say what that is and they don't seem to have made any effort to improve the article themself
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTENCYCLOPEDIC (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)