Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa McEwan
for the reasons specified in the nomination. The only coverage in |reliable sources is the 2007 controversy, and writing a "biography" that's really a record of this controversy is a violation of , not to mention  and our policies on |undue weight. That is fundamentally an irreconciliable issue &mdash; we cannot write a comprehensive biography because we don't have adequate sources to do so. Also, as noted above, the fact that vandalism remained for two months indicates that no one really cares about this article and that it isn't being properly maintained
— [[User talk:Crotalus horridus|***&nbsp;Crotalus&nbsp;***]], 15:36, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:BLP||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)