Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karla Lane
WP:PORNBIO|PORNBIO does not carry as much weight as most notability guidelines; as with the other additional BIO criteria, it's closer to a notability suggestion. ''See'' {{slink|WP:BIO|Additional criteria}} ("Meeting one or more of the additional criteria does not guarantee that a subject should be included."). The additional criteria are helpful shortcuts in most cases: when notability under  (or |GNG) is plausible but disputed; but they should not be used to find notability where notability is clearly absent.Here, the available coverage in reliable sources does not come close to meeting BASIC or satisfying |the reasons for the notability requirement; thus, the article may not be retained. I will reconsider my vote if anyone can point to specific sources that satisfy BASIC or GNG that I may have overlooked in my BEFORE.Also, I don't accept the suggestion that winning AVN's BBW Performer of the Year award proves that the subject "has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre." The award is going to go to ''someone'' whether the recipient's contributions are unique or merely the best that happened in a particular year. The rest of point 2 elucidates what a "unique contribution" likely entails: "beginning a trend in pornography; starring in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature; or being a member of an industry hall of fame .&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp
— User:Rebbing, 22:54, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:GNG||:WP:WHYN (Wikipedia:Notability)