Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civilian (street artist)
per Greatwalk. I think the notability of each artist needs to be assessed on its own merits – I do not support either blanket inclusion or blanket deletion. I also don't agree that "notability is POV". Wikipedia has clear standards about |notability, namely multiple non-trivial mentions in published sources. Some graffiti artists rise to that level of notability, but many don't.I do like the idea of an article like Street art in Melbourne, or some variation on that (using "street art" in the title would make it more inclusive than "graffiti"). Such an article could probably be quite easily assembled from multiple non-trivial sources, even if individual artists may not rise to that level of notability. If that kind of article is a good idea, in the future, I'd certainly like to contribute a Street art in San Francisco article (for which I can find many published sources for
— User:Peter, 07:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)