Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlestar Wiki (3rd nomination)
no real assertion of notability.  A bare mention on one independent site, a whole bunch of citations to blogs and the battlestar wiki itself, a conference presentation (?) privately published and apparently no mention in any actual journal or book of conference proceedings, and a broken (?) link to the AOL external site.  That last one, were it working, might let it pass , depending on its contents.  If it is working, and the only mention is the one sentence, which lists numerous other sites, then I withdraw my previous tentative support.  Aside from the one possibly viable source, I see no assertion of independent interest in reliable sources.  After 3 deletions, I'd say salt the earth; recreation can occur on a |sub-page and be moved after an admin clears it
— User:WLU, 20:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:SP (Wikipedia:Notability)