Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photo.net
for failing  - lacks multiple third-party non-trivial articles about it, no national awards.  The reason Google isn't the final arbiter of notability is because it's not entirely accurate on its face:  Yes, you get 4.4 million general hits from "photo.net", but only '''80''' are distinct hits, and of those 80 most don't have anything to do with Photo.net.  Most of these are similarly-named sites like aircraft-photo.net, and so, and this says a lot about the notability.  Yes, the traffic on the site is good, but that's not notability either (it's not a popularity contest).  See  for guidelines to improve the article
— User:Tychocat, 11:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)