Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think and Grow Rich
we seem to have a large number of ''bare assertions'' of notability from editors who (with the sole exception of KleenupKrew) have not bothered to ''substantiate'' these assertions by actually coming up with s (the ''explicit'' basis of both  & ) for this article. If every editor who opined with such confidence that this topic is ''obviously'' notable would actually provide (in the article) a single inline-citation to an independent RS for a single fact, the notability of this article would be ''iron-clad
— User:Hrafn, 07:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:BK (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)