Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Keane
as reasonable  from main article because of  issues; listing significant/notable awards and nominations for notable performers is a standard and expected part of our coverage. At most it would be trimmed and merged back there (''none'' of this is currently at Keane) so per  policy deletion is off the table. The nomination is completely without merit and confused as to relevant policy and guidelines. Outside of narrow BLP concerns we do not delete content "because it is unsourced"; we delete it because it ''cannot'' be sourced. And when we're dealing with notable awards and/or awards by notable organizations, it's simply not credible to claim that here. We have the awarding authority, the name of the award, the year, and the recipient. That arguably ''is'' a source, as awards and award announcements are effectively documents themselves; it certainly is a clear guide to a reader where the information can be found elsewhere. I suggest to the nominator, who has made a number of similarly invalid AFD nominations recently, that they ask an experienced editor for a second opinion before they nominate any more, else they find themselves topic-banned for repeatedly wasting the community's time. They should also read through  thoroughly and spend more time reading deletion discussions to see what is considered a persuasive or relevant argument
— User:Postdlf, 14:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPLIT||WP:SIZE||WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Splitting)