Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional applications of real materials
How can you argue that any of this meets our |notability guideline when  clearly states:  '''...fictional concepts are deemed |notable if they have received substantial coverage in |reliable ''secondary'' sources.  For articles about fictional concepts, "reliable secondary sources" cover information such as sales figures, critical and popular reception, development, cultural impact, and merchandise; this information describes the real-world aspects of the concept, so it is "real-world content".'''?  It seems that everyone conveniently overlooks this basic requirement for notability
— User:Blaxthos, 20:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:FICTION||WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)