Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Ballard
My understanding is that  is more relevant than  because Sarah Ballard is not a figure with "significant coverage" as required for GNG. As the expression goes, everyone has their 15 minutes of fame, which seems to have generated a few brief mentions of Sarah Ballard on some news stations and blogs. (This is not atypical for postdocs, since public outreach is often a requirement for positions like Carl Sagan postdoctoral fellowships.) However, none of these mentions suggests that she is generally well known. Instead, she seems to be a typical postdoc, making good, incremental scientific progress in an interesting field. Although I didn't specifically mention it in the nomination above, I agree with the others that  applies in this case
— User:OtterAM, 16:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)