Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProElite 1 (event)
or at worst, keep #1 and #2 and redirect/merge #3 back to ProElite... but reducing a reader's understanding of a topic is never a good first choice when issues are addressable. The applicable |guideline indicates that an ongoing series may have notability, and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ProElite+1%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%22ProElite+1%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=oDgfT5jZKMW02wWMicinDw&ved=0CA4QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=fc2a061fa472aac1&biw=792&bih=424 "ProElite 1" https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ProElite+1%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&source=hp&q=%22ProElite+2%22&pbx=1&oq=%22ProElite+2%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=119157l119282l1l120844l2l2l0l0l0l1l468l890l4-2l2l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=fc2a061fa472aac1&biw=792&bih=424 PerElite 2" and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ProElite+1%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%22ProElite+3%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&source=lnms&ei=ODkfT9-GNOPY2AXi36mZDw&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=1&ved=0CBsQ_AUoAA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=1520b380902028d9&biw=792&bih=424 ProElite 3" appear to |have the coverage to meet  and thus allows us |improvable topics. With respects to the nominator, improving a reader's understanding of any topic is always the greater consideration. |Better to improve the improvable
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 23:11, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:NRVE||WP:GNG||WP:ATD||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Notability)