Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation Seventh Day Adventist Church (second nomination)
per multiple sources cited from numerous independent publications, (e.g. ''Waymarks'' and ''In His Steps'') a detailed article in a well-known newspaper (The Clarion-Ledger), and per the outcome of the last AfD.  Nominator's argument that "Major contributors are church members (WP:COI)" is not an argument against the article itself, this is a behavioral guideline, not a content guideline; nor is it unusual regarding other articles about churches in Wikipedia.  According to  primary sources may be used: a) to make descriptive claims about the information found in the primary source, the accuracy and applicability of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge, and b) make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about the information found in the primary source.  These sources are so used.   Nom. seems to have (as stated) not checked all resources before making the nomination
— User:Zahakiel, 18:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PSTS (Wikipedia:No original research)