Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles Routledge
After careful consideration, I'm going to lean on the keep side. The subject's coverage of the siege on Kabul and his escape are sufficiently distinct for me to say it passes . The sticking point for me was on "|There is usually no need to write articles about things with no historical significance whatsoever." The siege on Kabul was historically significant, and in my opinion the subject's coverage of the events that transpired, as well as his wider media coverage, make him sufficiently notable to have an article
— User:Tojam2, 22:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:1E||WP:NOTNP (Wikipedia:Notability)