Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilateral relations of Ireland
Per , notability is demonstrated not by assertion, but by substantial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.  I see no evidence of any such coverage in any of these cases. You mention bilateral agreements, but can you list any? Does Ireland have bilateral agreements with any of these countries? (they will all be in the public domain if they exist, because of article 29.5.1 of the Constitution of Ireland, which provides that ''"Every international agreement to which the State becomes a party shall be laid before Dáil Éireann"'', with an exemption in 29.5.3 for ''"agreements or conventions of a technical and adminstrative character"''.) Also, I don't understand why you say "weak keep" when you list only one article as being capable of expansion, and even in that case you say that you "imagine" the expansion rather than offering any evidence of the possibility.The "keep" arguments here all seem to me to be broadly similar: they rightly stress the importance of the topic of bilateral relations, but fail to distinguish between those bilateral relationships which are actually significant to one or other party, and those which amount to little beyond the formal level of accrediting ambassadors and the low-level practicalities of consular arrangements.I have no objection to any of these articles being recreated ''if'' notability can be established, but in this discussion so far there has not been one shred of evidence for the notability of even one of the ten bilateral relationships nominated for deletion. They would all make useful list entries, but a list entry is not an article
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 14:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)