Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Schwartz
on some of the comments/arguments above - "The article fails to establish notability per WP:GNG or WP:BLP." and "At present the article is insufficient to keep as a BLP You would need to add the actual WP:RSes, not just hope they exist" - an article in Wikipedia does not have to establish the notability of its subject, nor do actual WP:RSes have to be added, a subject can be notable and have a poorly written article, please see Wikipedia:Notability#Article content does not determine notability|Article content does not determine notability. Also - "This is an article about the person herself. It is a biography and as such we need sources about her" - not necessarily, although  states "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published4 secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,5 and independent of the subject.6" which may appear to mean coverage ''about the subject'',  states that a subject is notable if "3.The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.", so that if there are multiple reviews of her books, then that will suffice.  Also regargding BLPs requiring indepth sources,  specifically states - "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability", so again no, there do not have to be indepth coverage of the subject (but then, there will need to be a lot more
— User:Coolabahapple, 14:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)