Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy audit
Which external links are problematic?  The embedded ones, or the ones listed in the External links section?  I've read the  page and fail to see how that's a rational for deletion; at worst, proper citations should be done, with some housekeeping on the more spammish links.  The tone could be improved (parts read like a brochure
— User:E8, 23:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:EL (Wikipedia:External links)