Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakan Ben Williams
although as Hullaballoo Wolfowitz mentioned it would be better to have somewhere to redirect to. There was a lot of coverage by a large number of blogs at the moment and for about a year afterwards. Content is not much, and while it was suggested that he might have been a fake person, that didn't get much following either. I agree that these sources fall short of  individually, but I do think that in tandem they show it to be notable enough for mention without failing  (that is, in case the subject ''is'' a living person), and also without absolute need for the subject to produce more content. Here is a pack of references, it's not everything that will come up, but they do provide an average of the available material and of its reliability:  http://www.sofir.org/sarchives/005248.php 1 http://www.afcpr.org/articles/6-7-08_stop_american_hiroshima.html 2 http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2006/03/fear_mongering_.html 3 http://socalviewsfromtheright.blogspot.com/2006/03/who-is-rakan-ben-williams.html 4 http://www.blackfive.net/main/2006/03/last_warning_br.html 5 http://www.nationalterroralert.com/2007/03/11/raken-ben-williams-last-warning-to-america/ 6 http://paxalles.blogs.com/paxalles/2006/03/rakan_ben_willi.html?cid=14949459 7 http://www.homelandsecurityus.net/Ind.%20Terrorists/rakan%20ben%20williams%20posts/rakan_bin_williams_exposed.htm 8 http://www.internet-haganah.com/harchives/005515.html 9 http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2006/03/who-is-rakan-ben-williams-jihadist.html 10 http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=35207 11 http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2006/03/rakan_ben_willi.php 12
— User:Patitomr, 16:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)