Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awesome Library (2nd nomination)
Did not find any independent reliable source with significant (or in fact any) coverage about the topic to meet . I admit I didn't search long; the name's generic quality makes it challenging to search. No sources are currently cited in the article. I read the previous discussion and simply disagree with the rationale that "keep" voters applied, i.e. that reliable sources are unnecessary because links on independent websites (Yahoo, NASA, etc.) that describe the site are sufficient. I'll check back here in case someone posts reliable sources that I overlooked
— User:Agyle, 22:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)