Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagaian Cosmology
If the term is "defined in the article" as a "unique synthesis" then it definitely  would be considered a |neologism for present purposes.  However, if the book has been reviewed in multiple, independent, reliable sources (and I would like to see those sources given the obvious  problem here), then the ''book'' is |notable and should have an article, even if the term should not.  I think I will contact Dr. Livingstone on her talk page
— User:JChap2007, 16:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:COI||WP:N (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)