Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTTrack
I added a couple of secondary book references to the article that discuss the software in detail (a few pages in each book). Along with the the references provided by the author of the software on the article's talk page, e.g., a paragraph in http://pdf.aminer.org/000/467/656/tools_and_techniques_for_harvesting_the_world_wide_web.pdf, there are multiple reliable sources, at least a couple in depth, that discuss the software. That the software is used by the Library of Congress is an indication of significance. The makes the topic notable under general notability guidelines  and software notability guidelines, . The article itself is not too promotional; I removed a peacock term. Notability of the topic and no major problems with the article suggest that this article be kept
— User:Mark, 16:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT (Wikipedia:Notability)