Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Unificationists (2nd nomination)
or rename: With the rationale given by nominator, it literally can't be deleted for those reasons. "Most" of the people already there means we'd be losing content. Even 1 character of content deleted without a new home is still lost content. That's picky, but something Wikipedia cares about. More still, there being a category doesn't mean there can't be a list page or vice-versa. They have different purposes. True Family is kind of limited to family, so even having 1 more name of someone that is independently notable on top of their membership to this faith, the article is justified. Weak points, I entirely admit this, but I can't think of any ''direct'' policy that would promote a delete. "Not needed" is a weak justification for nomination unless it's literally a copy-paste job, and instead is trying to cling on to . It's already here, and there's no reason to think that  fell through the cracks and this has to be vetted from scratched. That's not what AfD is
— User:Datheisen, 06:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ALLORNOTHING||WP:BURDEN (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)