Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of Attraction
I've just spent 3 hours trawling through numerous New Age web sites concerning the "Law of Attraction". They are fairly consistent in their use of this term and mostly refer to Hicks. There are http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Law+of+Attraction%22+Hicks&meta= 79,900 Ghits for "Law of Attraction"+Hicks. The argument that this is "mumbo jumbo" is not grounds for deletion. It is at the moment pure |POV on behalf of editors saying it. Verifiable sources should be provided that say it is mumbo-jumbo, and this viewpoint can then be included in the article. I have been trying to find a suitable source via http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=%22Law+of+Attraction%22+mumbo+jumbo&meta= 409 Ghits. Maybe someone else can do better. I have moved the page to Law of Attraction (New Age) per above comments
— User:Tyrenius, 12:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)