Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Arthur Baird
Have tilted off the fence toward the keep side.  Not overwhelming, but coverage from this era can be very hard to find in on-line sources. I'm also influenced by the fact that there's enough sourcing available  to build a fairly well-rounded article rather than a perma-stub.  All in all, enough to get over the  hurdle (in particular, the newspaper sources and ''Illinois Bar Journal'' items cited in the article and the four newspaper articles referenced above by Jweiss). In fairness to the nominator, the current article is considerably improved from the minimally-sourced stub that existed at the time of the nomination
— User:Cbl62, 19:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)