Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/York Place Studios
Comprehensively fails . All the coverage is from listings on industry sites, blogs, etc. The only exceptions are two articles from the ''Newcastle Evening Chronicle'' and the ''Newcastle Journal'' which are virtually identical and published on the same day—a local interest story about one of the partners when she was still in college. Neither of them mention the business at all. I can find nothing better. The "awards" are utterly non-notable. This has all the hallmarks of the paid-for article, springing fully formed from the hands of a "new" editor, complete with multiple perfectly formatted references (masquerading as independent reliable sources) and a perfectly formatted infobox . Note also that York Place Studios is a member of the 20Collective, an article by the Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody|Orangemoody paid editing sockfarm and deleted multiple times. Although created by an allegedly different user, he/she has the same ''modus operandi'' as the one who created Neil Palmer Photography (another non-notable member of the 20Collective). i.e. create the page first as a redirect and then return a week later to turn it into an article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neil_Palmer_Photography&type=revision&diff=663689960&oldid=662463288, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=York_Place_Studios&type=revision&diff=663572643&oldid=661562270. UGH
— User:Voceditenore, 18:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)