Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinals–Royals rivalry (2nd nomination)
I !voted "weak keep" last time, mainly since "there's likely other tidbits floating around about the 'rivalry'".  That was a presumption on my part.  However, I am disappointed that more sources have not been identified to satisfy 's requirement of multiple independent sources of significant coverage since the last AfD, which was a "weak keep" consensus.   Note also that the article had been http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cardinals%E2%80%93Royals_rivalry&diff=461350426&oldid=460806407 tagged with not meeting GNG since November 2011.  My |good faith recommendation, taking into account people have real lives, is for interested editors to agree on a timeline whereby sufficient sources will be identified so a consensus can be reached on notability. Would another month be sufficient
— User:Bagumba, 14:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Notability)