Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James H. Stuart
without prejudice against recreation if somebody can do better. Unlike Colin Basran, whose depth of coverage I can easily vouch for because he's the current incumbent and thus his coverage Googles well, Stuart's term in office predates my ability to locate any suitable sources — even the databases I can dig into for older pregooglable media coverage don't include Kelowna papers prior to the early 2000s, so I can't establish whether or not it's possible to write or source anything of substance here. If somebody else with better access to the archives of the ''Kelowna Daily Courier'' is willing and able to tackle writing something much more substantial than "he existed and here's a |primary source to prove it, the end", then that could change things — but we can only evaluate notability on the basis of sources that are ''shown'' to exist, not those that are merely ''presumed'' to exist, so he can't be exempted from having to clear NPOL #2 on the sourcing just because we assume there's probably other coverage we can't actually find
— User:Bearcat, 19:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)