Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jae Bryson
notability is not established, and while the number of Ghits is low, the number of GNews archive hits is http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Jae+Bryson%22&um=1 way lower at 14. To me, that is more an indicator of lack of notability. Lack of Google hits doesn't deny notability, although it often correlates; but if there are few or no GNews hits, it indicates that there are few or no articles in independent, reliable sources that constitute coverage of the topic or individual. Even if there were tens of thousands of hits in Google, the real scarcity of independent hits in news archives shows lack of suitability. Also, only http://books.google.com/books?ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Jae%20Bryson%22&um=1&sa=N&tab=np four hits in GBooks, and only one of them is a book written by Bryson. (Not intending to use a reverse- point, but we did ''speedy'' the article for Chuck Hustmyre http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Chuck+Hustmyre just a few months ago and he has authored http://books.google.com/books?q=+inauthor:%22Chuck+Hustmyre%22&lr=&source=gbs_authrefine_t at least five books
— User:Frank, 21:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)