Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vereniging Basisinkomen (2nd nomination)
during the first AFD I initially !voted keep, based on the presence of a large number of sources.  I then reviewed the sources in greater depth, and found them lacking and changed to !undecided.  Mentions were either brief throwaways that couldn't be used to justify any text (i.e. essentially stating that VBI exists but not staying much else beyond address and phone number) or were from themselves extremely dubious notability sources (and here I'm thinking of the nomination of one VBI member for an award by a tiny political party, that no longer exists and never received a parliamentary presence, from another country in a non-Dutch/English language source, for which their work, of which VBI was only part - that ''may'' be notability for the person, at a stretch, but not for the organization).  After re-visiting all my previous analysis and discussions on the organization and the references/sources, and checking the history to see nothing has changed since my last edit bar the addition of a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vereniging_Basisinkomen&diff=211523379&oldid=210572529 category, I am quite comfortable with a !vote of delete.  Discussion is minimal and insufficient to pass the guidelines of .  I am comfortable with what minimal information that exists being merged into the Basic income in the Netherlands page as a section
— User:WLU, 02:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)