Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bikram Grewal
Actually, Shyamal, if you know something of the subject's notability, then please don't recuse yourself. It's not forbidden to write about something you know about; it is only forbidden to use your own brain as a reference. The notability guidelines are just that - guidelines. If WP:Scholar doesn't adequately cover all types of scholars, we can do one of three things: either take the issue to the people (which I think AfD is a fine start for that in some regards, although a wider audience should be sought), |be bold and make new guidelines to fit the situation that works with (and not against) the existing guidelines, or drop back 10 yards and punt this to  (and sue me for mixing bird watching and football playing...). What could the guidelines be for guidebook writers such that it would be consistent with GNG and WP:Scholar? Would Bikram fail or pass those guidelines
— User:UtherSRG, 11:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BOLD||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Be bold)