Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Heche
We shouldn't impose a higher burden on establishing the notability of individuals who hold views that differ from ours.  So Ms Heche is not a gay-positive individual?  Who says this is a fringe view?  How many of the individuals who vied for the Republican nomination for the US Presidency hold the same or similiar views on homosexuality?  I'll accept it is a minority view, but it is at least an order of magnitude too common to be a frienge view.  We should all aim to be be sufficiently fair that that we can draft a neutrally written article that fairly gives the appropriate amount of coverage to views we disagree with.  As I read this article I didn't see any glaring lapses from .  I remind everyone that, if an article is on a notable topic, then perceived lapses from  are supposed to be addressed through wikitags, discussion on the article's talk page, and attempts to replace wording regarded as biased with more neutral wording.  Our deletion policies are pretty clear -- noone is supposed to argue for the deletion of articles due to a concern over bias
— User:Geo, 04:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)