Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution as theory and fact
I see no  problem.  There are many high quality references to eminent life scientists and other notable scientific opinions published in |reliable sources.  The article is clearly using these sources in a manner consistent with the authors' intention.  Also, I disagree with JJL's characterization of the article as an essay.  This is a notable distinction, particularly in creation-evolution polemic, and as such is clearly deserving of its own article.  See, for instance, Casey Luskin's report at the Discovery Institute: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2008/07/is_evolution_a_theory_or_fact.html part 1, http://www.evolutionnews.org/2008/07/is_evolution_a_theory_or_fact_1.html part 2
— User:Silly, 03:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)