Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Judaism (2nd nomination)
The Criticism of Judaism article should not be deleted as there are articles on Criticism of Christianity, Criticism of Islam, Criticism of Hinduism, and Criticism of Buddhism. It is not neutral and  to have criticism articles on some religions while not on others. It would be incredibly biased and would never be accepted. Either there are criticism articles on all religions or no criticism articles on any religions with all criticism of religion as a whole covered in the Criticism of religion article. Articles should not be deleted merely due to content dispute. That is infantile and is not constructive work on Wikipedia. Articles should not be deleted because  otherwise many important but controversial articles would disappear from Wikipedia. This whole debate stinks of an attempt by some to censor Wikipedia, to censor criticism of a certain religion. ikipedia is not censored, it's a fundamental part of Wikipedia to be neutral and not censored. Wikipedia cannot work if is censored and biased. Censorship is bias
— User:Space25689, 18:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:W (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)