Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilimall
This is an interesting scenario as the company likely passes  but fails  and . As of yet the company has not achieved the level of in-depth, significant coverage needed to pass the new NCORP guidelines, but many smaller news articles do cover the company. If those that discuss routine business news I consider to be irrelevant, but these stories seems to be more along the lines of news stories than business announcements. Then again, some could also be considered as trivial PR coverage (''Kilimall does X, Kilimall sells Y, Kilimall opens location E'') generated by Kilimall to increase their notoriety. There is also the concern that the article in question was recently (and possibly still is) the target of a marketing blitz perpetrated by a sock farm at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Louislouis510/Archive. My recommendation would therefor be to delete the article and apply the  option to have a more experienced editor create the article in a non-promotional manner. This would allow said editor(s) to decide which of the many minor sources concerning Kilimall are notable enough for inclusion
— User:SamHolt6, 23:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Notability)