Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim terms
review again in a couple of months.  The article is only 3 days old.  It has clear potential for improvement.  It could be, at least potentially, a very encyclopedic and useful overview for comparing/contrasting key usages and acting as a portal to more detailed presentations on specific words.  #DICT does not apply here -- this is not a dictionary.  The editors should be given a chance to remedy  and  concerns by more comprehensive citation to s.  The "Neutral" column, in particular, is not sustainable without detailed references.  But I see no reason why the other columns should not be sourceable.   AFDs are supposed to consider the potential of articles for improvement.  This article has potential
— User:Jheald, 13:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOR||WP:POV||WP:RS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)