Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Domains
the fact that a speedy deletion prod from the nominator was contested does not invalidate a subsequent AfD nomination. All four "sources" are from the company itself and can not possibly be considered "independent". Cannot find anything even close to "significant coverage" of the subject - looks to fail  fairly clearly. For the record, Hover (domain registrar) is also in fairly bad shape and should probably be considered for deletion also. But  is not a good argument for keeping this article. Nor is 
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]], 02:45, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:THISNUMBERISHUGE (Wikipedia:Notability)