Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lapal primary school
There are so many problems with the above I don't know where to begin. I see at least three issues. First the matter of a questionable premise - the repeated assertion that all schools are notable even though most people don't think that. Two the irrelevant tautology- obviously everyone agrees that verifiable sourced |notable schools should be kept but to claim that is a policy is simply wrong (in fact, if something were agreed to be notable but not meet  it would be removed.  overides pretty much everything). Third, this once again has the usual buzzwords about organic growth which I have yet to see a defintion. What does this mean? How is organic adding anything to the phrase, and how is this somehow relevant
— User:JoshuaZ, 03:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)