Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slut Night (2nd nomination)
Most of the references are to a non-eliable_sources|reliable source, and if the remainder do not mention ''slut night'', then this is basically an unreferenced article. A search didn't find significant coverage - it could be argued that a ''niche'' subject like this would not have much anyway, but as far as I am concerned, if no reliable sources can be found, it is too obscure to be worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Slut+Night%22+source:%22-newswire%22+source:%22-wire%22+source:%22-presswire%22+source:%22-PR%22+source:%22-press%22+source:%22-release%22+source:%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2000&as_hdate=2019&lnav=hist6 Google News has no significant mention (most of the mentions are not about this article's practise) as there isn't on either http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Slut%20Night%22%20source%3A%22-newswire%22%20source%3A%22-wire%22%20source%3A%22-presswire%22%20source%3A%22-PR%22%20source%3A%22-press%22%20source%3A%22-release%22%20source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&sugg=d&hl=en&sa=N&tab=sp Google Book Search or http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Slut%20Night%22%20source%3A%22-newswire%22%20source%3A%22-wire%22%20source%3A%22-presswire%22%20source%3A%22-PR%22%20source%3A%22-press%22%20source%3A%22-release%22%20source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&sugg=d&hl=en&sa=N&tab=ps Google Scholar Search
— User:Phantomsteve, 08:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:R (Wikipedia:Redirect)