Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip H. Friedman (2nd nomination)
There is still no evidence that this author has had any impact on his field. The "references" listed at the article, and the "additional sources" offered at the DRV, are merely a bibliography of his self-authored material. The only secondary source is  http://www.spiritualityandpractice.com/books/books.php?id=19653 one review of one of his books in a non-notable journal website called "Spirituality and Practice". I was the sole commenter at the original AfD (full disclosure: this second AfD was called to my attention by Gaijin42), where I said I found no citations at Google Scholar; I apparently didn't allow for the fact that he has such a common name. On re-searching now I find http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Philip+H.+Friedman%22&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 some listings, but most are self-published rather than in peer reviewed journals, and most of them are citations rather than actual publications. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_vis=1&q=%22Philip+H.+Friedman%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 Eliminating citations, I find half-a-dozen publications in peer-reviewed journals, with fewer than 10 citations each.  I stand by my original assessment that this subject is not notable under ,  or 
— User:MelanieN, 19:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SCHOLAR||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)