Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Beale (5th nomination)
How do people interpret the secondary notability criteria? : "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." This use lots of disjunctions, so it logically follows from the following statement "The person has played a major role in co-creating a well-known work that has been the subject of multiple independent reviews." The latter is satisfied by Beale, so by implication he satisfies .  What else do you want? Significant coverage in reliable source, yeah, yeah, but ''what's the point of having secondary criteria then
— User:Vesal, 12:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)