Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clarice Phelps
Government organisations provide profiles of employees for promotional/outreach reasons on their websites and in internal publications. Only some of these will have clear or marginal notability; in the latter case  and/or  might apply, but the profiles themselves do not provide or necessarily even contribute to notability. Here's examples of profiles from the https://www.energy.gov/diversity/search-womenenergy-profiles US Department of Energy,  https://dod.defense.gov/News/Special-Reports/Womens-History/more-stories/ US military, https://www.army.mil/women/profiles/ US Army, https://www.epa.gov/careers/profiles-women-epa US Environmental Protection Agency, and https://books.google.com.au/books?id=I4sL5WGoxnoC US Department of the Interior. I'd give more weight to IAR if her article was key to interlinking unconnected articles as supporting pillar 1 (''heretical version: "Wikipedia is a hyperlinked encyclopedia"''), but until coverage improves this is likely to end up an orphan or close enough if she is given due weight as it's clear now that she should not appear at tennessine. With current sourcing, the only articles which provide — or are likely to provide — incoming links to her article are lists (section or full article), and she really shouldn't appear in any which state that members listed are notable. (''One of these days there is going to be someone whose article's AFD is going to achieve clear sigcov
— User:Hydronium, 01:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:NPOINTS (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)