Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrightStar Care
Hi {{u|Atlantic306}}, would you mind taking another look? References to meet the criteria for establishing notability are different that the standards for reliable sources. Commenting on the specific sources you mentioned, the https://www.webcitation.org/72sxdGfAx Chicago Tribune reference relies nearly entirely on an interview with the founders, fails . The https://www.webcitation.org/72sx5jCFC Fox reference likewise relies on an interview, fails . The https://www.webcitation.org/72sx5jCFC Detroit News reference is a feature on a franchisee and there is no evidence of any intellectually independent opinion/analysis/etc. Finally the https://www.webcitation.org/72stcSAiB?url=https://madison.com/wsj/business/providing-care-is-their-business/article_0d1d2857-2875-5536-aac5-5987836d88a9.html Winsconsin Journal is also a feature on a franchisee again with no evidence of any intellectually independent opinion/analysis/etc as required. All those references fail  as per ''Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
— User:HighKing, 11:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)