Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seascraper
I object to the above renaming proposal. For one, it's patently obvious that the mentioned http://www.greenmuze.com/images/stories/photos/build/design/des110/gyre1.jpg Gyre Seascraper is anything but amphibious. The other problem is the seeming lack of significant coverage. Again, a term doesn't belong to WP unless it's specifically covered by at least a couple of reliable sources. If we want to rename it, it's better to rename it to something like :Floating building. Google Books has a number of  sources for this one, including http://books.google.com/books?id=Z4D-0J9R4QMC&pg=PA468&dq=%22floating+Building&ei=Lx2lS9uWG5juyATtyYXBCA&cd=1#v=onepage&q=%22floating%20Building&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=A9qWqqoaQMAC&pg=PA347&dq=%22floating+Building&ei=Lx2lS9uWG5juyATtyYXBCA&cd=6#v=onepage&q=%22floating%20Building&f=false, and http://ftp.resource.org/bsc.ca.gov/title24_part03_dice/title24_part03_page0532.pdf
— User:Rankiri, 19:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)