Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Sabrosky
Passing MILPERSON-6/8 or NPROF is borderline. I see (manual calculation) a h-index of around 10 and 1 major publication (''Interstate alliances: Their reliability and the expansion of war'' - 166 citations, the rest have 32, 28, 26, 26, 5 less than 20, the rest less than 10). What is of concern here is  in regards to his 9/11 and Mossad operation theories - coverage of this seems to be scant and mostly passing (at least in reputable publishing outlets....) - and not in depth - e.g. there is https://forward.com/news/349432/9-11-anniversary-sparks-new-wave-of-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theories/ this and on the other hand https://books.google.co.il/books?id=x5QL4aWSLJYC&pg=PA147&dq=%22Alan+Sabrosky%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwih3cWUqILcAhXBEZAKHXh4CgEQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=%22Alan%20Sabrosky%22&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=UIha0iJu-20C&pg=PA136&dq=%22Alan+Sabrosky%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwih3cWUqILcAhXBEZAKHXh4CgEQ6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=%22Alan%20Sabrosky%22&f=false which support this - but there isn't enough in-depth mainstream coverage of this to cover the fringe aspect in a NPOV manner
— User:Icewhiz, 06:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)