Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to Tennessee (album)
It passes  but does not now meet the requirements of . It has coverage, at least a mention at Amazon - Amazon is  for existence, track listings, planned release dates; but not reviews. The coverage is not "significant" though. However I lean towards keep as I have strong expectations that significant coverage for an album by a notable artist WILL happen and be enough to establish notability. Article is a work in progress and a reasonable expectation that notably will soon be established is, in my judgment, justification for a keep. Article has been tagged with {{tlx|notability}} and deletion should be reconsidered if a reasonable amount of time has passed without "significant coverage in independent sources" shown
— [[User talk:NrDg|NrDg]], 18:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NALBUMS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)