Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phunckateck Communications
I posted a (second) PROD notice on the article today (not noticing the first one) and it was taken down.  The person who removed it posted to the talk page saying that they, and others, had been listing references which noted the collective's significance.  I see only one reference site (used four times) which is nothing but a database.  Nothing signifying why the collective is '''notable''' as opposed to simply in existence.  Since the first PROD notice, they've had nearly two weeks to make this article better but all it has become is a directory, which |Wikipedia is not.  The article fails notability standards under either  and 
— User:Dismas, 02:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:CORP||WP:MUSIC (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)