Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Worth
Nom gives no valid reason for deletion.  The tone is irrelevant, the number of wikilinks is irrelevant, whether there's synthesis is irrelevant, and the number of GHits is irrelevant.  Thus the nomination itself fails.  However, the guy clearly meets  #1 as his work is very highly cited.  For instance, see https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22mark+worth%22+whistle&btnG= this GScholar search on the guy's name in quotes + the word "whistle" to filter false positives.  For whatever reason his work mostly isn't listed there, so it's hard to calculate h-index, but the number of citations is evident.  This is strong evidence for his being respected by his peers, which is what AUTHOR asks for.  Also, there are interviews with the guy, e.g. http://www.dw.com/en/africa-needs-to-catch-up-with-protection-for-whistleblowers/a-37873356, which, per , establish notability. Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
— [[User talk:192.160.216.52|talk]]), 18:58, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:INTERVIEW (Wikipedia:Notability)