Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erasmus Darwin Barlow
fails  criteria #3 (:Category:Fellows of the Zoological Society of London does not demonstrate that organisation is "highly selective", at least in terms of zoological contribution -- selectivity on social standing may be another issue, also it appears to be a charitable/conservation society, rather than an principally-academic one), #6 (was only the secretary of the ZSC, not the president, and it's charitable-not-academic, per above) #7 (appointments are not contributions -- and those listed are generally more administrative than research-orientated). Also fails 'General notes': "It is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject." I would further note that the article fails to articulate ''any specific contribution to either psychiatry or zoology
— User:Hrafn, 01:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)