Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual personal names (3rd nomination)
We don't need "universal agreement" on a topic in order to document it, otherwise we couldn't have articles on topics like Beauty, Terrorism, Pornography, or Christianity. NPOV only requires that we fairly document any controversy where it exists in reliable sources. However, I doubt there is much "controversy" surrounding what names are "unusual", that is, you will find few, if any, reliable sources saying something like "Creedence Clearwater Couto is not an unusual name for a person." Sure, unusual is in the eye of the beholder, but if the beholder is a |reliable source, then we can document it
— User:DHowell, 01:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)