Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Carson
for now.  It can be better re-evaluated with the perspective of time in six months or a year or five years if there's still significant feeling at that time that she's not notable. |Wikipedia does not have a deadline, and if the article is deleted now but it's decided in a year or so that she was notable after all, the work that has already been done is lost and has to be re-done. Also, I'm opposed to moving this to Eve Carson murder or Death of Eve Carson.  While there doesn't seem to be any uniform policy on Wikipedia, and examples of both can be found (that is, there are articles on people notable solely for being murder victims directly under the person's name, and there are articles on people notable solely for being murder victims under the event), it seems looking at the various subcategories under :Category:Murder victims, that it's much more common to have the article under the person's name directly.  (Granted, not all of those people are notable ''solely'' on account of being murder victims, but many are
— User:Chuck, 18:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEADLINE (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)