Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gravity in meta-analysis
1)''' Yes.  It's .  Note that it says articles ''should'' have more than one external source, but not that articles ''need'' to have more than one reliable source.  '''(2)''' I understand that but the question is who has the burden of proof: the person who says it isn't notable, or the person who says it is?  Again there's Wikipedia policy on that, which is .  That policy says unreferenced material should be cut, so the burden of proof is on the person who says it '''is''' notable to provide |verifiable references from |reliable sources to prove their case
— User:S, 15:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:BURDEN||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)