Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of Attraction
I don't see why this article was proposed for deletion in the first place. There are http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Law+of+attraction%22&meta= 435,000 google hits. It is quite obvious that this concept is in wide use by many people and the article needs to be expanded to study this. The objections raised so far are |OR and |POV. We're not interested in whether editors think something is mumbo-jumbo. We're interested in whether something is sufficiently widespread and of note to merit an encyclopedia article. This obviously is. I'm sure a lot of people consider consider that Christianity is mumbo-jumbo. That is not a reason to delete the article on Christianity. There is no wiki criterion for "mumbo jumbo". There is one on "patent nonsense" and this is already addressed on the article talk page
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:No original research)