Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Fertik
I think CorporateM raises some good points, so I have further updated the article.  Again, I have a declared non-financial COI so I'm not going to vote, but I believe CorporateM's issues have been addressed.  As to notability, the article now links to articles about Fertik in the New York Times, Forbes, The Chicago Sun-Times, and a few others, plus some TV profiles (such as 20/20).  That should be enough under  to show multiple reliable independent sources (full articles with photos about him in more than 3 national print publications plus some TV), but there's also the role in World Economic Forum, the book he published, and his columns for Inc., HBR blogs, and the Washington Post.   Each of those (WEF, bestselling book, columns) doesn't prove notability by itself, but in combination it should get across the hump under the secondary  criteria even without the publications.  As to the quality of sources, I agree that it wasn't great originally.  I've tried to add profiles from third-party sources (Businessweek, Inc., Harvard Magazine, etc.) on major facts.  I don't think it's perfectly sourced yet, but it's at least improving
— User:Sunnymale, 10:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)