Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedish Judicial Authority v. Julian Assange
and do not merge (although a merging discussion would have to take place elsewhere anyway).  I created the article so perhaps I can shed some light here.  The coverage of this case in the media has been disproportionately large, and as a result the section on the allegations in the Julian Assange article was getting a ridiculously large an thus violating  and .  I don't like deleting cited factual material altogether from the encyclopaedia so I decided to create a separate article for the material so that I could delete the material from that article.  This is not |content forking (this refers to situations in which the same content is dealt with twice in two articles such that the two article substantially overlap) but instead a conventional application of .  The ''existence'' on an article is never , only the disproportionate representation of a particular opinion or event ''within'' an article.  For example, it is  to include alternative fringe theories in the article for the mainstream theory, but the fringe theories still get there own articles where they are described from the NPOV of reliable sources.  This is true of any verified but  material.  You don't simply deleted cited factual material altogether from the encyclopaedia but instead you merely delete t from the article after finding a more appropriate place for it, creating a new article if necessary.  We can't delete it because it meets the notability criteria, and we can't include all the material in the Julian Assange article because that would violate  and also we would be worse off in terms of .  If it were to be merged, it would have to be with some "Notable European Arrest Warrant Extradition Cases" article, but the fact of the matter is that there is an extensive amount of factual material that has been reported on this case and it would simply take up too much room as a subsection of any other article
— User:Gregcaletta, 06:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DUE||WP:BLP||WP:CFORK||WP:UNDUE||WP:UNDUE||WP:UNDUE||WP:UNDUE||WP:DUE||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)