Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paige Moss
While the nominator's concerns are reflected in the article's |easily addressable (former) current state, and with respects to those above... a little |WP:AFTER goes a long way.  This individual's career does indeed surpass the |notability criteria for actors and the person is covered directly and in detail in multiple reliable sources.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1994&as_user_hdate=2010&q=%22Paige+Moss%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22Paige+Moss%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go  There is a Rebuttable presumption|quite reasonable presumption of notability for her named roles in 10 different films and recurring or major support roles in numerous television prductions... such as she playing Tara Marks in 7 episodes of ''Beverly Hills, 90210'' or as Hayley Cartwright in 2 episodes of ''Baywatch Nights'', or as Veruca in 3 episodes of ''Buffy the Vampire Slayer'', or as the lead actor|lead Maddy O'Neil in 20 episodes of ''It's All Relative''... and many, many more.http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0609055/filmotype  Yes...  is met, as well as .  While |fixing up an improvable article might |take a little work, a |lack of overdue effort is not a proper rationale for deletion
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 21:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE||WP:ENT||WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:ATD||WP:HEYMANN||WP:NOEFFORT (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)