Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bureaucrash (2nd nomination)
Looking at the 16 references, I see 3 YouTube links, 4 links to the groups' websites, 6 trival mentions (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122221440058969313.html?mod=googlenews_wsj, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/uk_news/magazine/4088584.stm, http://books.google.com/books?id=ltu3AAAAIAAJ&q=Bureaucrash&dq=Bureaucrash&ei=wb2-ScChJoLOlQTJmoH2Dw&pgis=1, http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/healthscience/stories/DN-SICKO_30bus.ART.State.Edition1.36d691c.html, http://books.google.com/books?id=XGBp415LyrAC&pg=PA144&dq=Bureaucrash&ei=wb2-ScChJoLOlQTJmoH2Dw#PPA144,M1, http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2001-03-16/article/3907?headline=Debate-strong-over-controversial-speech), 1 blog (http://blogs.sltrib.com/movies/2007/07/sicko-spin-patrol-continued.htm), 1 book I can't check and 1 proper article at the Washington Times. I think it fails , not enough '''significant coverage''' in multiple '''reliable''' and '''independent''' sources has been shown
— User:Sloane, 23:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)