Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of zoophilia
with the History of zoophilia as per . I can't find any guidance on when a timeline counts as redundant / when one should be created. Does wikipedia have one? There seem to be lots of redundant timelines on Wikipedia that are uncontested. But it seems like this timeline doesn't add too much. If this is not a Redundantfork, keep and cleanup. None of the other problems the articles has are -REASONs. I'd say most of the refs do meet  (books, laws). History of zoophilia is not necessarily better written. e. g. it seems to be wrong about the first criminalisation, as per Timeline of zoophilia|Timeline: "c. 1,750 BCE – The Code of Hammurabi is written and in the code, King Hammurabi of the Paleo-Babylonian Empire proclaims capital punishment for anyone engaging in bestiality.1" (1 being an RS book). This issue is mostly a question of cleaning up misleading wording, maybe , and unsourced stuff (like the bizarre mention of death by horse penis). Need for clean up doesn't warrant deletion
— User:Trimton, 20:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:REDUNDANTFORK||WP:DEL||WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Content forking)