Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Putinjugend (3rd nomination)
as the nominator does not give any valid reasons for deletion. Article is very well referenced (''Find sources'' above gives many more), the concept is actively used and often described; not only in news but also in books and scholarly sources. I do not understand why ''one'' {{plainlink|url=http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2006-06-12-schmidu-de.html|name=German source}}, discussing the phenomenon in detail, is mentioned in the nomination - especially as even cursory reading of said source makes it clear that the article is about meaning of the Putinjugend described in the article. I also would like to remind the nominator that AfD's are closed based on arguments, not votes - and  is not a reason for deletion
— User:Sander_S, 07:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)