Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Art in Public Places
With the article's lack of notability all but settled, I'd like to address whether PAPP is a reliable, cite-able secondary source as well as the question of . The problem with establishing the former is the lack of transparency and vetting. Looking at https://www.publicartinpublicplaces.info/ PAPP's official site, I don't see what I'd expect to see to confidently link to it. The claim is that PAPP "collaborates with with local governments, news media, technology firms, and arts and cultural organizations to provide free and accessible public art information as a public benefit." But other than Google, none of these are named. There's no history of the project. No endorsements from institutions or experts. As established above, there's no press coverage. The Director, a "social ecologist", has a one-sentence bio and no other online presence I can find. Do you see the problem
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LINKSPAM (Wikipedia:Spam)