Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelda Ramos
Most of the references in the article are primary (by an exhibition space about their own exhibition), dead links (no longer mentioning the subject), or only mentioning the subject very briefly (e.g. the "Not easy togetherness" source). The one exception is the boladenieve site which appears to be both independent and in-depth. And the only exhibits of the artist's performance and works that the article discusses are an exhibit at a private gallery and a piece in a multi-artist show at the Mexic-Arte Museum, which don't seem to rise to the "substantial part of a significant exhibition" or "significant critical attention" clauses of . Which is to say, I don't think the article as it is currently written is enough to demonstrate notability. But there are other in-depth and independent sources to be found, for example http://www.lapollera.cl/nelda-ramos-artista-multidisciplinaria/ and http://www.andes.info.ec/es/cultura/chileno-pedro-lamebel-argentina-nelda-ramos-participar%C3%A1n-primer-encuentro-sur-sur-ecuador. So I think she does pass  at least, and possibly also , but it would help to add better sources to the article
— User:David, 23:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Notability)