Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Railsback (3rd nomination)
nbsp; We've now seen four examples of .&nbsp; Deletion arguments keep trying to reduce the focus of attention away from the entire corpus of evidence that this topic has received the attention of the world at large over a period of time (WP:N nutshell).&nbsp; CNN is not a WP:RS(?)&nbsp; Only the pageant in Kansas can be allowed to contribute to GNG (since when does Wikipedia only like people who win?).&nbsp; And all of those sources in Kansas (width 410 miles) can be discounted as local as per WP:CORPORATION (cited by two to three delete !votes).&nbsp; Coverage in Orlando and N Y City is not really evidence, because, you know, pictures are for people to look at, and such pictures don't represent attention given to the topic by the WP:RS(?)&nbsp; Yet this topic is truly a special case, as a state pageant winner who has transitioned to become a focus of national political attention, generated by the fallout from the controversy following the announcement of Donald Trump to become president of the US.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 01:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)