Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boogie2988 (2nd nomination)
I find deplorable that the AfD nominator seems to have attempted to pull a fast one by not notifying the article creator, so I left the notification to {{u|Czar}} myself). I was initially wary when Czar recreated this article in late 2016 (I had closed the 2014 AfD as a (barely) delete, enforced with G4 for years eventually salted the page due to repeated recreation), but if you'll allow me to quote my own keep rationale from a JonTron AfD: "{{tq|Plenty of sources about the person and the channel from well-established RSes like Ars Technica, Kotaku, Engadget.... I think people dismiss Youtubers and a lot of "internet culture" things because they're not into it, but WP:GNG is the baseline for every article, regardless of topic, and this article's sourcing far exceeds the requirements of GNG, even though admitting that may displease some who would like to see Wikipedia cover more academic/scientific/historical topics and less pop-culture ones.}}" If passing GNG is somehow not convincing enough,  #1 (an "important figure" having won a major award in ''the'' major industry award ceremony) or maybe even  #2 might be applicable (although these are just more-specific definitions of the overarching GNG pillar
— User:Salvidrim, 16:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:ENTERTAINER (Wikipedia:Notability)