Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faxination
to Fenestrae B.V., which might just barely scrape by as notable; there's nothing worth merging that's not already there.  I don't think http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/108806/information_gateways_faxinated and http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/94458/faxinating_messaging_market are enough to support a full article, and all the other hits for "faxination" seem to be either independently-coined neologisms, misspellings of "fascination", or (most commonly) reprinted press releases.  The article creator's rather blatant |conflict of interest (e.g., images uploaded with fair-use rationales consisting solely of "promotional" or "marketing") doesn't help matters a bit. &mdash
— User:Korath, 02:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)