Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Break, Break, Break (movie)
Normally, when a film is "non notable" it is new and/or insignificant, where sufficient reliable sources do not yet exist and/or may never exist.  In this case, there seems to be a good-faith assertion that it is so ''old'' that sourcing simply isn't available anymore.  While acknowledging the principle of notability, I would be far more willing to give a film in this predicament the benefit of the doubt than a more modern work.  Having said that, if all we have is enough to meet , what can we really say about it that will be instructive to our readers? Thus, I officially have no opinion, leaning towards keep
— User:Jclemens, 18:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)