Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bell & Ross (3rd nomination)
Passes  with sufficient  sources. I can understand mistakenly assuming that a watch brand that's only 30 years old must be a fly-by-night, especially when compared to others that have been around for 100-200 years, however Bell & Ross is actually a fairly notable Swiss brand within the industry. Is it notable as defined by Wikipedia? Yes. Apart from https://www.bellross.com/pressreview the company's collection of third party reviews, there is analysis of the brand itself, such as https://books.google.com/books?id=G9ZQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT179&dq=bell+%26+ross&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiJ3P3qqKjtAhWxRDABHd0xAVEQ6AEwAHoECAYQAg ''The Watch, Thoroughly Revised by Stone and Pulvirent. Abrams 2018''. I would also point to https://www.hodinkee.com/brands/bell---ross many articles in Hodinkee, which is sort of the horological equivalent of Car & Driver
— User:LuckyLouie, 18:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)