Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mims–Pianka controversy
An examination of the sources reveals that many are simply rehashes of other sources with some commentary, as is standard practice in blogging, and thus should not be considered |distinct sources. There is no national or international coverage of any depth. (The one international source is a short spot that recaps a blog post that is already referenced.) Coverage is not persistent. The event appears to have had no lasting effects and has not become, say, an standard example of pro-extinction rhetoric or something like that. Thus, per |notibility guidelines, this article should be deleted, with limited relevant material moved to related pages, with no prejudice against resurrection should the event become notable in the future
— User:Gimme, 10:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DIVERSE||WP:NNEWS (Wikipedia:Notability)