Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayley Gap
I'm not even sure this "Baylay Gap" exists. Even if it does, it obviously hasn't achieved substantial independent coverage to pass . To the author: Simply existing isn't a basis for inclusion in Wikipedia. Not even for a scientific discovery or electronics product. And while, sure, this "Bayley Gap" might be known around the world in a few years, to include it in Wikipedia now would be in violation of rystal ball
— User:Wakandas_black_panther, 02:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:C (Wikipedia:Notability)