Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Hundred Thousand Hearts
We brought in a professional writer" - quite often not a good idea on Wikipedia. Still, it's your money... (Disclaimer: I am a writer, but do all my work here on Wikipedia for free.) Anyway, very non-notable film, and at two hours I can't see this subject being viewed by the unconverted very much. The three references given in the article are no help. None of them even mention the film - and the Wikipedia one is not a reliable source . I do wish the film success (even though I can't see it happening) and would be quite happy for a return of an article on the subject if it does achieve more than it seems to have so far. Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and also that notability is often not achieved overnight (or even in three weeks...). If it does come back, read the policies, get the references that do more than just mention the film in passing, ask an editor with a good list of contributions for advice - and don't waste money on outside writers. We'll tidy things up if needed. (Some of the 'professionally written' things I've seen here have been amongst the lowest level writing I've seen outside schools. This is written well enough, but is far too long and detailed - and a bit soapboxy 
— User:Peridon, 10:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SOAPBOX (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)