Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unexplained boom
This concatenation appears to be |original research. The notability requirements of  seem not to have been met.  It is possible that a detailed reading and summary of the scholarly articles mentioned above could result in an appropriate article, but this list is not it
— User:Bejnar, 23:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:OR||:WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:No original research)