Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Holt
as insufficiently notable at this time.  suggests that if she were more notable, she should be able to rely on disinterested parties to create a proper article for her instead. With only her self-added IMDb data and her official website, independent tertiary sources are lacking at the moment. (And I'm skeptical of IMDb's vetting of her information. They certainly don't seem to have cared that she apparently added 2 largely overlapping mini-bios, when even one is a bit unseemly
— User:Jeffq, 00:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)