Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zikula (3rd nomination)
I'm seeing a lot of forum posts, primary sources, and blog posts, but very little by way of reliable sources that might establish . Going weak delete because there's an indication there are sources (other than those linked in the previous AfD, which I don't see as sufficient) in languages that are functionally unavailable to me. So I'm content to change my !vote if people can point out some decent ones, but for now we have an article about a company that probably doesn't pass GNG and is sourced ''entirely'' to its own content. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 21:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)