Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incels
or '''Very selective merge''' to sexual frustration. If the ''concept'' was closed as delete just ''6 weeks ago'', there shouldn't be a question about an article for the abbreviated version/|neologism of/for that same concept. Seems like it could qualify for CSD in that regard. Based on the contexts in which this neologism is used, if merged, sexual frustration is the clear choice as being nearly synonymous (see previous AfD for more on the unsuitability of other targets). Quoting from my comment from August, that there are sources which combine the words "involuntary" and "celibacy" does not mean there is a distinct concept that merits a stand-alone article. In order to have a stand-alone article, it must be a concept we don't already cover elsewhere. The same goes for a neologism about the same concept. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 04:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)