Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Recife
Judging by https://www.thecynthiacorbettgallery.com/usr/library/documents/main/165/eduardo-recife-cv-december-2019.pdf this  source, we should expect a GNG pass because it looks like he has arguments under  4 b) and 4 d). Turning directly to GNG, here are some independent and in-depth Portuguese or Spanish RS that others might have missed: https://stafmagazine.com/gallery/eduardo-recife/ 1, https://www.hojeemdia.com.br/almanaque/o-mineiro-eduardo-recife-%C3%A9-refer%C3%AAncia-no-universo-internacional-do-design-1.325113 2, and two that are not very in-depth but give indirect evidence of his notability, https://www.raulnarros.com/los-collage-de-eduardo-recife/ 3 and https://inspi.com.br/2014/01/ilustracoes-eduardo-recife/ 4. This is on top of a bunch of coverage of his books, some of which was given above, which gives further credence to the signs for an NAUTHOR argument too even if the NARTIST direction isn't sufficient. Note that I have just included Portuguese or Spanish sources; there are lots more English sources but I assume others can find those. Some of these sources directly attest to his notability (a good sign for, say, NARTIST 1), with for example the Hoje em Dia article calling him "bastante procurado" — really sought-after. This article needs better sourcing but in terms of notability it is a comfortable keep
— User:Astrophobe, 06:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:NARTIST (Wikipedia:No original research)