Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order of battle for the Battle of Long Tan
We have plenty of OrBat articles, and putting this detail in a separate article is valid under . I accept {{u|Mztourist}}'s point that Long Tan has had far too much written about it, but in Wikipedia terms that amounts to . "Uniquely notable" is not the criterion for lists; significant coverage in reliable sources is. Yes, it could be in the main article, but moving material into a subarticle is valid under . That no other Vietnam War engagement has an OrBat falls under : "The nature of Wikipedia means that you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on whether other articles do or do not exist, because there is nothing stopping anyone from creating any article
— User:Hawkeye7, 21:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPINOFF||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SPINOFF||WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST (Wikipedia:Content forking)