Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annika Connor
there is absolutely nothing here to say that this painter is notable. All coverage is routine and very low quality. There are about four barely acceptable sources, and by that I mean that they just barely qualify as sources. The majority of the coverage is interview-style and promotional in nature. Fails all notability tests, and especially  on all counts.Special:Contributions/104.163.148.25|104.163.148.25
— [[User talk:104.163.148.25|talk]]), 03:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Notability)