Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jsreport
yo|Pofider}} wow! Your last edit was nearly three years ago, yet you responded here within minutes of this discussion going up. So I'm guessing that that you're pretty handy at web monitoring too. :) Anyway. This is a tricky one. Going strictly by , the nominator is right, it doesn't have significant coverage in eliable sources online, and zero Google News or Gbooks hits. But Wikipedia doesn't have official guidelines yet on software notability, mostly because it's so hard to come up with any general guidelines on which a broad cross-section of editors can agree. It seems to have pretty good support outside the project, NuGet, PyPi, etc., and it seems to get a lot of mentions on sites like StackExchange. A lot of widely used FOSS tools suffer from the problem of being overlooked by magazines and books, unfortunately. So I don't know quite whether this should be deleted or not, and would be interested to hear from wiser editors than me, before deciding
— User:Wikishovel, 15:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP: R (Wikipedia:Notability)