Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Scooter for Yaksmas
deleting these articles would be contrary to , which would mandate the articles being redirected back to the parent article - List of episodes of The Ren and Stimpy Show. As to the question of whether reliable sources can be found for these shows, a quick google search reveals that the New York Times has a number of reviews from the first run of the show which could be used http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE7DB1130F935A2575BC0A964958260, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE4DA143CF931A25750C0A964958260, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE1DC133CF932A15752C1A965958260 which mention Emmy award nominations and ratings "astonishing for Nickelodeon". The book ''Nickelodeon Nation'' (ISBN 0814736513, New York University Press) has a chapter on Ren and Stimpy which "provides a fascinating look at the wide commercial and audience success of a controversial show that perhaps ought to have been marketed to adults rather than children." http://www.ybp.com/acad/reviews/0205_nickelodeon.html and academic Mark Langer's "Animatophilia, Cultural Production and Corporate Interests" is a "serious study of Ren and Stimpy". (Animation World Magazine - issue 3.7 - October 1998). Finally the DVD releases includes commentary and introductions from creator John Kricfalusi and have also caused a number of reviews to be published that analyse individual episodes. http://www.popmatters.com/pm/tv/reviews/ren-stimpy-the-lost-episodes. There are many ways for editors to start improving these articles, deletion should only be considered after other searches have proved fruitless
— User:Catchpole, 14:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:EPISODE (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)