Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unforgivable Trilogy
as per comments from 68.239.79.97 above.  AfD makes no comment about whether the video is "good" or not, or how legitimate it is. It purely looks at  and I find that based on what has been said here and my own looking around, it fails this criterion. AfD should not look at how well the article is written, either - this is purely about whether or not the subject should have a WP article.  Right now, I do not think it is notable enough, and #Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball | WP is not a crystal ball. If it becomes notable in future, then an article could be developed. (It would help if you signed your comments using ~~~~ at the end
— User:Alucard, 19:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)