Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rimini Street (2nd nomination)
per Tony.  The fact of it having been previously deleted does not make it notable, per JJay's amusing and ingeniously self-referential reasoning, but the fact of it passing  through significant media coverage does - even if I do think that at this stage it's "just another startup, just like all the rest".  I still think nothing should be added to the 'pedia until at leasta  year after it happens, to allow for proper perspective.  The scrabble by companies to get on Wikipedia as part of their startup marketing program is a real concern to me.  But Tony wrote this, and Tony has better things to do with his time than do other people's spamming for them, so in the end I'm trusting to his judgment re the company even if it looks to me like a close call.  Possible merge to Seth Ravin as a compromise solution
— User:JzG, 14:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)