Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papaya (group)
Your argument that "We kept X so we should keep Y" is misleading. First, the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Moulann|afd for Moulann resulted in a "no consensus" which maintained the status quo (also meaning that it can very easily be nominated for another afd). That is not "a vote for keeping" the article. Second, the only thing, germane to this discussion, that those two have in common is that neither meets , which is obviously not a good reason to keep the article
— User:Ektar, 14:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BAND (Wikipedia:Notability)