Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tips from the Top Floor
There are two arguments that could be made for notability here,  and  #2.  I don't see that the article or Anarchangel has established sources that meet the first of those criteria.  WEBCRIT 2 only applies to "well-known awards", on one hand, I think it's a stretch to suggest these are well-known awards in the meaning of that criteria, but that is mitigaged by two wins (2005 and 2006 education award.)  I don't know of precent relevant WEBCRIT and the Podcast awards, but am willing to reconsider my view in view of such precedent if it's brought to my attention.  The two relevant discussions on the relevant talk page Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(web) do not appear to be sufficient to argue a consensus either way
— User:Joe, 20:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:WEBCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)