Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minister for Men
As Cazort shows, there are .  I'm concerned that the other !votes do not pay sufficient attention to this, and to the merits of the information in the article, discussing less relevant fringe issues (absolutely fringe), no "minister for animals" bordering ridicule.  There are many crackpot ideas on Wikipedia, their inclusion is determined if there are multiple independent RS - this is a pass. I found an additional one from the http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/every-day-a-fathers-day-1256142.html The Independent and The Observer source has found way as a reference in http://fap.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/18/1/35 scholarly research (sse Reeves, R
— User:Power, 09:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)