Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional history of Spider-Man (2nd nomination)
Violation of  not to mention -U.  I don't see why plot information can't simply be included on the main Spider-Man article; yes, there's lots of it due to 40+ years of stories, but we don't need to describe every story in such detail.  People have argued in the previous AfD that merging would clutter the main Spider-Man article, but not if the info was summarised.  PLOT states "A concise plot summary is appropriate as part of the larger coverage of a fictional work."  Therefore, an independant article dedicated to detailed plot information violates that policy.  Yes, it can be acceptable to branch out into a specific sub-article if an article becomes too long, but the Spidey article isn't even that big, and per , "just because the spinout article is given more space to grow does not mean that excessive plot summaries or fictional character biographies are appropriate."  An article like Publication history of Spider-Man could work if the Spider-Man article ever did become excessively long, but the title "Fictional history of Spider-Man" just encourages in-universe information and the article is inappropiate.  While I'm sure readers would find this biography useful, it's really more suited to the http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Peter_Parker_%28Earth-616%29 Marvel Database than Wikipedia
— User:Paul730, 16:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PLOT||WP:IN||WP:WAF (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)