Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schrödinger's Rapist
Firstly, I want to make it clear that I believe that many of the deletion rationale's given in this thread are totally invalid.  The fact that an article on the phrase "Schrodinger's cougar" is irrelevant, as that is a made-up phrase that as far as my google-fu can tell has never been used in the history of the internet; thus, it would be deletable under , , and .  On the other hand, the existence of the concept of Schrodinger's rapist is trivially verifiable.  Nor is the identity of the creator of the article relevant to whether the article should be deleted. Nor is the article being "shite": OTCLEANUP|AfD is not Cleanup.  However, the article ''is'' about the term "Schrodinger's rapist", and as far as I can tell, the term is not notable.  Any discussion of the term seems to come from blogs which don't meet our |standards for reliable sources, though the term is ''mentioned'' by some reliable sources.  If the article could be turned into a discussion of the Schrodinger's rapist phenomenon (i.e. that women are expected to take responsibility for not being raped, but have no way of knowing whether or not someone is a rapist, and so have to treat all men as potential rapists), ''and'' if evidence that this is notable is found (possible, though I'm not sure of the best way of searching for it) then this might be keepable (or, at least, mergable into rape culture).  So long as this continues to be an article about the term, however, I think it is deletable
— User:Caeciliusinhorto, 09:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:N||WP:HOAX||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)