Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Orgasmic Illness Syndrome
I have cleaned up the article, removed all the unverifiable and personal-experience cruft, and properly sourced every statement.  What we're left with is a single journal article (case study involving two people), a press release that says they've actually seen five such cases, a glorified dictionary that summarizes the journal article, and an unrelated column written by a physician that is very probably, but not definitely, the same condition.  I have tried to include every possibly relevant fact from the sources, even including these non-medical sources, without transgressing , , or , so what you see is about as much as possible:  just fifteen (15) short sentences.  It's maybe not a bad article, but there's no chance of this being a |good article unless/until dramatically more is written about it in |proper reliable sources
— User:WhatamIdoing, 17:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:V||WP:GA||WP:MEDRS (Wikipedia:No original research)