Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003–04 Manchester City F.C. season/FA Cup Fourth round replay
because the case for violating  is an ass-backwards piece of reasoning.  The comeback game is notable because people frequently mention this game whenever another comeback occurs.  The repeated occurrence, almost every few months, of "lists of best comebacks" featuring this game that get posted on the web in both blog and news media articles simply serves as a testament to this game's intrinsic notability in the collective consciousness.  Additionally, the elephant on this page that no one appears willing to address is ''TerriersFan's'' calling out of the paranoid mindset that clings to the fallacy that keeping such an article will somehow automatically open the flood gates for thousands of other similar articles to be generated that might possibly cause Wikipedia to become overwhelmed by such articles in the future.  Reality, however, does not support such a negative viewpoint.  What is much more likely to happen in these situations is that the editor(s) who created the deleted article(s) simply won't wish to fruitlessly waste any more of their productive time creating future Wikipedia articles. The consequence is always more likely to be a loss of good editors rather than an over-abundance of similar articles
— [[User_talk:Mancini&#39;s Lasagne invite to Harry|'''Mancini&#39;s Lasagne invite to Harry''']] Talk, 13:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)