Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WorkXpress
In terms of the AfD, a quick http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=workxpress google news search returns 3 syndicated posts and a name drop in an article about moving, all of them from the same regional journal. In consideration of the questionable reliability of your main source, the fact that the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=&user=&page=WorkXpress&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1 article logs show a long history of speedy deletions, the spamming of other cloud computing article(s) and image(s) with this one, various quality, , , , POV and other policy issues, and constant interference with process (e.g. the essays above) I think this article should be deleted and salted until such time as you can demonstrate |verifiable |notability by way of non-trivial references in multiple |reliable sources
— User:SamJohnston, 22:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)