Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engadget
No where in  does it say that the nominator has to be acting in bad faith. When the nomination has a snowball's chance in hell, that's grounds for Speedy Keep. And I'm amazed how frequently editors push  with total disregard for . I don't even read Engadget and I know it's a very notable website. I dread the day when Wikipedia gets so uptight that someone's gonna want "1 + 1 = 2" cited by a verifiable, reliable, independent source. And that's not an "if", that's a "when
— User:Amwestover, 04:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SK||WP:RS||WP:UCS (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)