Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David G. McAfee (2nd nomination)
and start over with a lot of loving . I think McAfee probably is notable, but this article is overly sourced with references that aren't independent of the subject, and feels very promotional. There are, however, enough mainstream secondary sources which discuss his books which, in my opinion, make him pass  #1 as being cited by his peers. Some are already in the article itself. I haven't seen the older article, but this article has too many primary/non-independent-of-the-author/irrelevant sources
— User:SportingFlyer, 07:41, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:NAUTHOR (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)