Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survival Edge Technology
Very few of the sources provided meet the project's standards. Most are self-published (Medium user pages, Blogspot) or are directly connected to Banerjee, or both. There are better quality sources ''cited'' in some cases, like legitimate scholarly journals, but those sources do not mention this topic specifically, only the general background concepts (the essence of a  objection). The best quality directly relevant source seems to be ''India Water Portal''. But the cited content there has a disclaimer ("Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of India Water Portal.") that makes me question whether this material went through that site's normal editorial process. I am certain that the people employing this neologism are doing good and important work, but Wikipedia's standards of inclusion are based on different criteria, which I don't think this meets. The closing administrator will likely also want to note that all of the supporters above have very few, if any, contributions outside this topic (or, often, outside this AFD
— User:Squeamish, 15:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)