Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Dahlene
I was asked to reevaluate the article, and have done so. While it is true that an additional factoid (he was a college president for a few years too) and some sources have been added, it appears to be window dressing. The sources either (in a couple cases) have links which do not even work, and for those that do, mention the subject only in passing or trivially, or are primary. No substantial independent sources, ''no article''. So to be clear, I stand by my rationale of delete for the version of the article as of this writing, or any other, as it appears as far as I can find, ''substantial'' independent sourcing on this subject simply does not exist. A bunch of Wikiproject members |liking it does not change that
— User:Seraphimblade, 13:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)