Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola LC88
The article on 87 was proposed for deletion for having no references.  This article does have references.  If the proponent of deletion thinks that the references are inadequate, they may make that statement as the reason for deletion.  The two articles are not comparable, in that one was referenced and the other was not.  If the deleted article can be properly referenced, it can be resubmitted, either preferably via |Articles for Creation or directly into mainspace.  If this article is not properly referenced, then it should be deleted, but I think that it is properly referenced.  Your opinion may vary
— User:Robert, 03:40, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AFC (Wikipedia:Articles for creation)