Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NodeXL
Most does not mean all, or all but one. I would be happy to eliminate citations that you think are inappropriate, but (see below) I argue that there are a number of citations that are not . I think the article structure does need work, but that should be a matter of editing, not deletion. This software has been downloaded over 30,000 times (as I have mentioned on the article discussion page) a number that is far from obscure for the network analysis community. This software has been continuously supported by funding and research efforts from a number of universities / research labs, as described in the article. This software has been described and used in multiple peer-reviewed publications and not just technical websites
— User:Vlad43210, 12:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:QS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)