Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazes and Minotaurs
Actually you are mistaken regarding whether rpg.net is an appropriate source.  Per #Criteria| we have:{{cquote|The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.  This criterion includes reliable '''published works in all forms''', such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, '''websites''', and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations.}} Also, as this game is also published as an e-book, we have in |WP:NOTABILITY (books) {{cquote|The criteria set forth below apply to books in electronic form (or e-books). However, the notability of e-books should also be evaluated using the notability criteria for web-specific content, as well as a determination of whether the book is covered by Project Gutenberg or an analogous project.}} Rpg.net is an important source in the context of an article about Role-playing_game|RPGs.  You might notice from its own article that it is itself considered notable enough for Wikipedia, besides {{cquote|RPGnet is the second largest roleplaying forum, after Wizards of the Coast.}}  And besides http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/12/12092.phtml several http://www.rpg.net/news+reviews/columns/tempus12nov02.html articles in rpg.net, a quick google search unveils other articles on http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/index.php?topic=24175.msg236174#msg236174 similar http://www.fudgery.net/fudgerylog/2008/01/24/79/ rpg http://grognardia.blogspot.com/2010/01/review-mazes-minotaurs-players-manual.html sites. It is http://www.owlcon.com/2010/events_ttrpg.php#Mazes%20&%20Minotaurs scheduled for http://www.owlcon.com/ OwlCon XXIX (referenced BattleTech Centers|here) and http://www.theescapist.com/ypal/news.htm Origins http://www.theescapist.com/blog/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=1 Gamehttp://www.originsgamefair.com/ Fair (referenced Game Manufacturers Association|here). I think it is important to rate Notability in context, which is clearly at issue here.  The context here is Indie role-playing game|Indie RPGs, and |in that realm sources like RPG.net are particularly important. The fact that M&M is referenced by sites and associations which are considered notable for Wikipedia standards is notable
— User:Rifter0x0000, 14:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:NB||WP:OBSCURE (Wikipedia:Notability)