Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelia Womack
unless the article sees improvement. While being deputy leader of a political party ''can'' be enough for notability ''if'' the person is properly sourced as clearing , it is not an automatic inclusion freebie that guarantees an article ''regardless'' of sourcing issues — but this, as written, is based almost ''entirely'' on |primary sources rather than |reliable ones. Of the two citations that actually constitute media coverage, just ''one'' is actually ''about'' her to any significant and non-trivial degree; the other just namechecks her existence in a pro forma list of ''every'' candidate in an election that she ran in. And Netherzone's 327 Google News hits aren't strong ones, either — I see a lot of glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage of other things, and ''not'' any significant number of hits that are ''substantively'' about ''her''. The ''Huffington Post'' hit, for example, does not represent coverage in which she's the ''subject'' — it's content in which she's the bylined ''author'', which does not assist notability at all. I'm simply not seeing the depth or breadth of media coverage that it takes — when it comes to whether a person clears GNG or not, we care about the ''substance'' and ''quality'' of the Google News hits, not the raw ''number'' of them
— User:Bearcat, 14:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)