Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruben Gasparyan
Thanks for the cleanup, Tokyogirl79, it helps make what's claimed and what's sourced here much clearer. What's claimed: that he worked for a scientific institution eventually becoming a mid-level manager, and that he published stuff. Neither of these things is sufficient for notability per : working for a national academy is not the same as being honored by membership in the academy, chairing a department is not the highest level position at the academy, and we need evidence of impact not just of publication. As for sourcing: it's pretty much nonexistent, so the article fails verifiability and would have to be trimmed back even more severely if kept
— User:David, 21:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)