Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAGs of 2006
I can see this is heading for , but will still defend it - they may have got their fame only through their partners, but that's not an automatic bar - if it weren't for family ties, would we do have articles on Sarah Macaulay|a PR agent from Buckinghamshire, Laura Bush|a librarian from Austin, or two very lengthy Humphrey (cat)|articles about Socks (cat)|a cat, or indeed overwhelmingly !voted "keep" on an article about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blondi|an Alsation? The 2006 WAGs are the subject of http://wags.itv.com/ their own TV series, news coverage ''as a specific group'' in Britain's http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2001290023-2006270209,00.html biggest-circulation newspaper and lengthy articles (again as a specific group) in both of Britain's leading quality newspapers http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/06/18/nwags18.xmlhttp://football.guardian.co.uk/worldcup2006/story/0,,1804182,00.htmlhttp://observer.guardian.co.uk/osm/story/0,,1954237,00.html
— User:Iridescenti, 19:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)