Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run Sheldon (2nd nomination)
as passing  with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources -- http://www.gamezebo.com/games/run-sheldon/review Gamezebo and http://www.gametrailers.com/mobile-apps/49788/review-run-sheldon GameTrailers are two reviews from reliable /RS sources. I'd ideally want to see 3+ reviews from our RSes. But this is certainly not a run-of-the-mill game if the entire games industry is concerned, most games don't even get mentioned, let alone get reviews. For other articles included, http://www.realwire.com/releases/Run-Sheldon-Speeds-its-Way-onto-the-App-Store is definitely not reliable, they charge for posting articles. http://appadvice.com/appnn/2013/04/will-the-turtle-outrun-the-hare-find-out-the-answer-in-run-sheldon and http://www.appannie.com/apps/ios/app/run-sheldon!/ look semi-okay, although they don't have an official reliable source status. Other reviews include http://www.148apps.com/reviews/run-sheldon-review/http://www.modojo.com/reviews/2013-04-10-run-sheldonhttp://www.padgadget.com/2013/04/17/help-sheldon-the-tortoise-escape-from-the-evil-hares-in-run-sheldon-ipad-game-review/ etc. although these aren't yet considered RSes, but I believe do supplement GNG. The rest of the hits are press releases or non-reliable sources. Of course, notability of the topic is independent on how the article is written and frankly it's written better than most our game articles, so I don't agree with  issues. (Posting the comment on this AfD, since it's a later one and properly announced.) —&nbsp;&nbsp
— user:Hellknowz, 13:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:VG||WP:GAMECRUFT (Wikipedia:Notability)