Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISO 13407
The http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22ISO+13407%22&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws 2,390 gScholar hits which stopped the article's deletion via |PROD cannot be ignored. It seems as though the standard has received "significant coverage" as required by the |GNG. Not quoted by Ron Ritzman (neutral nominator) was this pro-deletion argument: "It is also worth noting that ISO 13407 was replaced last year by ISO 9241, further undermining its notability." However, |notability is not temporary (and I can only assume this is why the nominator left it out). Furthermore, the IP nominator adds "a review of of its current content" to the list of reasons for deletion. Article issues outside of those listed at #REASON| "should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion
— User:Guoguo12, 02:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROD||WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Proposed deletion)