Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Cow-Girl
Even measuring the topic (unnecessarily) against the |basic notability guideline for people, we find that the article more than qualifies:"A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject…If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then '''multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability'''; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability" (emphasis added). The subject has coverage in no less than seven major British news outlets referenced in the article, for at least one of which she is the primary topic of an article.http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/comment/newspaper-opinion/2008/06/14/by-election-is-a-freak-show-86908-20606700/ By any measure, the outcome here is obvious
— [[User talk:Skomorokh|Skomorokh]], 13:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)