Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart shoe
Another ill-considered nomination from this nom, who's racking up a lot of bad AfDs in recent days.  Plainly an  nomination, because if he claims that this fails , I can only respond that he has no idea what  ''says'' -- the ''very first sentence'' of the guideline is "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources."  ''Forbes'' and the ''Wall Street Journal'' count.  The nom may "escalate" all he likes, but he might be startled to find that AfD has no appeals process.  From a nom who's been making AfD nominations for ''nine years'', this degree of misunderstanding is inexplicable
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']], 09:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)