Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John F. Ashton
In addition to my earlier comments, which were based on the content of the article and the lack of good sources that could be found on its subject, JJB's problematic behavior here and on the article (, , ) makes it look very unlikely that we can maintain a properly sourced and properly neutral article. Essentially, anything that anyone else removes for being too weakly sourced, too picayune, or too remote from the subject gets put back redoubled. If there is a core of notability here (which I doubt, but if there is) then he is making it impossible for the rest of us to find it by insisting on padding the article with all this non-notable fluff
— User:David, 15:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OWN||WP:TE||WP:WIKIPUFFERY (Wikipedia:Ownership of content)