Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottawa District Badminton Association
Notability, for the purposes of getting a Wikipedia article, is not attained by just asserting it, but by |reliably sourcing that it has been the ''subject'' of enough ''media'' coverage to clear  — but the references here are almost ''entirely'' to |primary sources such the |self-published content of the association itself, the clubs and teams that are members of it, and the provincewide parent league that it participates in — and it's not the ''subject'' of ''either'' of the only two things here that represent acceptable -assisting reliable sources, one of which just verifies the existence of an individual person named in the article ''without'' actually verifying the reason ''why'' he's named in the article, and the other of which is just an unretrievable deadlinked bare URL (which is the ''reason'' why I keep getting on people's backs around ''always'' providing the ''full'' citation details and ''not'' just a bare URL: weblinks ''die'', and we can't ''retrieve'' a dead reference from an archival source if we don't know what its ''title'' was.) So none of this properly demonstrates the assertion that it's a notable organization, because notability ''depends'' on ''media coverage'', and this has none that I can locate
— User:Bearcat, 17:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)