Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duplicate Record Detection
I completely reject the argument that it is too long. |Wikipedia is not paper and should go into as much depth as anyone wants to write, as long as it's based on sources.  It is true that the tone of the article is not encyclopedic, but that's never been a reason for deletion, only for cleanup.  The only reason I think it should be deleted, and it's a big reason, is the copyright status. I hope the author gives proof he can republish this under GFDL
— User:Nadav1, 19:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PAPER (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)