Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rankings of retirement destinations in the United States
Good to see some input on whether to keep or delete this article, although comments thus far on whether the article can be edited and kept are missing. / have been mentioned; the article is ''not a travel guide'' and does not fit within the parameters of the policy at this time of what WP is not. The article's subject and focus is on the topic of rankings of retirement destinations rather than a list of the top places to retire. The distinction is important, as a list of the best places to retire is a travel guide, while the topic of ranking of the best places to retire is not. The same would be true for best vacation destinations; a list would be a travel guide, while the topic of ranking of the best vacation destinations would not. The article includes a list of places as examples, clearly cited, to illustrate the topic rather than ranking places best to worst which may be considered a guide. As for , there are no arguments of A + B = C. If there is, please state a specific example. While the information has been gathered, sources have been clearly cited so the article does not fall in . If there is a specific example of original research, please state so. The article has been written from a neutral point of view with the five pillars of WP, something refreshing for a topic usually covered only by the media and advertisers. This is what WP is about. Cheers
— User:Gmcbjames, 18:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)