Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radioactive Panda
edit conflict). So far I have seen no rationale as to why this comic is notable. Two people have said it "seems notable" with no evidence to back them up, and one person has opted to keep because the previous two did. AfD is more than a vote. If it seems notable, I'd like to hear why. I see the author has published one book, but I can't find ''any'' information on it, leading me to believe it might be minor or self-published. Most of the links to it are from http://www.google.ca/search?as_lq=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.radioactivepanda.com%2F&btnG=Search private blogs, it has a http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.radioactivepanda.com%2F&url=radioactivepanda.com traffic rank of around 450k, and I can't find any third party sources to |verify anything. In fact, the only two sources in the article are both primary- we have one from the website, and another from a forum. If someone wants to provide evidence to the contrary of what I've said I'll consider changing my opinion
— User:Wafulz, 14:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)