Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyFreeImplants
To me, it's dependent on one's personal definition of "non-trivial" mentions per  and , about the site itself and not just the topics of breast enhancement, cyberbegging, etc. The blurb about the BBC Three show doesn't mention the site at all, just the breast enhancement market in general, and there's no indication (without watching it or reading a transcript) that it's mentioned in a more than passing fashion on the program itself. Likewise, the Houston Press article is more about cyberbegging in general, and mentions the site in a vague "here are some sites we found" context rather than truly being "about" it. The AVN thing is also just an ad for some promotion that mentions the site in a context of a giveaway. I can't speak to the reliability of Vyuz as a news source, however. Of course, other editors' opinions may vary, so I welcome their input as well, in terms of possibly changing my recommendation
— User:Kinu, 16:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)