Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Gluckstein
Being a regular contributor to a television talk show ''can'' be enough to get into Wikipedia ''if'' the article can be properly sourced over  — but nothing here gives him an automatic inclusion freebie just because he exists, and the sourcing is nowhere near adequate. Of the four sources here, two are |primary sources that cannot assist notability at all, one is a publication (''Post City'') that doesn't qualify as a |reliable source, and the only source that counts for anything whatsoever (''Toronto Star'') doesn't count for ''much'' since it's not a ''substantive'' profile ''about'' him, but merely quotes him giving decorating advice. That's not the kind of sourcing it takes to make the article keepable — if you're shooting for "notable because he exists", rather than "notable because he was awarded the Order of Canada, or a Canadian Screen Award, or a major literary award for his book on the history of interior design", then the sourcing has to do considerably ''more'' than just ''nominally'' verify that he exists
— User:Bearcat, 20:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)