Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissy Houlahan
obviously without prejudice against recreation in November if she wins the seat. Candidates are ''not'' automatically presumed notable just for being candidates — and since ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election ''everywhere'' can ''always'' show some evidence of campaign coverage, the existence of some campaign coverage does ''not'' automatically hand a candidate an instant  pass that would exempt them from still having to pass NPOL. The amount of sourcing shown here is nowhere near enough to already make her candidacy a special case over and above everybody else's candidacies, because ''every'' candidate could ''always'' show this many sources
— User:Bearcat, 16:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)