Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 2016 Paris police station attack (2nd nomination)
As is the case with these averted attacks, there is a wealth of  coverage consistent with the 24-hour news cycle, and scant follow-up references to demonstrate any level of enduring notability – therefore a failure to meet . I disagree with E.M. Gregory's assertions above that coverage is "in depth" and "extensive" – having read the references given, I would conclude that the standard of coverage is no more extensive than the level that would be expected from any newspaper reporting on the facts of any attempted murder. The argument that the incident is notable because coverage was international is not backed up by any policy – routine international coverage is still routine coverage, and does not demonstrate any enduring notability. I would support merging the content into the proposed list of failed terrorist attacks which generated some support at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2015_New_Year's_attack_plots|this related AfD, but I would delete this article
— User:Aspirex, 07:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)