Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YATE
I originally deleted this as a spam article but was asked to reconsider and allow the article to improve. As the deletion was marginal I acceded. Clearly, the article has had time to improve and has but it still lacks independent reliable sources for verifiability and help establish notability. Without these, the article is not compliant and should be deleted. Note to Dheeman  isn't a reason to keep
— User:Spartaz, 19:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)