Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PIXELearning Ltd
I declined a speedy - for |unambiguous promotional-ness - but thought that the article should probably be deleted at AfD. However, Pcap's sources sway me towards keep: the first one, in seriousgamessource, looks |reliable as far as I can make out and together with the book and Gscholar mentions adds up to notability in my mind
— User:Olaf, 14:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:G11||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)