Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamza Tzortzis
Meets  for being the focused topic of multiple bylined secondary sources.  Ironically, I could ''possibly'' accept the argument that ''some'' of these sources are not eligible for inclusion in the article themselves per , HOWEVER, inclusion in the article is not a requirement to survive AfD, merely existence.  Note that I'm not ''actually'' accepting the argument that these sources are not eligible, merely arguing that even in the case of successfully arguing their exclusion from the article, that they still firmly establish notability, due to their pervasiveness (there are a large number of RS's reporting on him) and extensiveness (each of the RS's are devoting quite a few words to him
— User:Fieari, 00:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)