Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in biology
Redirect to List of biology journals, per comment just above. Merge content into History of biology, History of neuroscience, etc., etc., etc. There is no way for editors to determine the boundary between what is and what isn't a "breakthrough" without engaging in . It would be much more encyclopedic to discuss these published studies in the course of pages that discuss the breakthroughs as they occurred during the histories of the respective fields. Also, note Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists: normally our list pages are lists of blue-linked Wikipedia articles, not lists of items in text form
— User:Tryptofish, 19:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)