Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//r/science
I think the interesting aspects of Allen's involvement, the PLOS partnership, and prominent AMAs all provide credence to . My initial reaction was delete, but after reading the article in depth I'm a soft keep
— User:Shibbolethink, 17:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)