Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science Park High School (Newark, New Jersey)
Well, while certainly referring to someone as a Yahoo or anything else is a question of |civility, the lack of professionalism in trying to hurry and type a reply is itself a problem. If you don't have the time to send a thoughtful, considered response, then the wise thing to do would be to refrain from responding.  It's basically an extension of the 10-second rule when you're angry.  If your alleged school administrator wanted to convince people, it would behoove them to do a better job of responding effectively.  Sure, anybody can make a typo, or forget to zip up their fly, accidents happen, pobody's nerfect, but there's still a responsibility to be professional.  As to your claims of a reason to delete this article, they are not convincing. The COI problem in this case is minimal.  If you can't make edits to it without bias, that is your problem, not the articles.  The same goes with Vandalism.  It happens all over Wikipedia, every day in thousands of articles.  So far, it hasn't destroyed the world yet, and I doubt it ever will.  But it will likely remain an ongoing problem, not just for this subject, though high schools with the typical immaturity of teenagers do attract a lot of problems, but for almost any of them.  If your school administration thinks there is a problem with its students though, perhaps it might be worthwhile to consider instructing the students as to the value of integrity, honesty, and not making vandal edits to Wikipedia.  This could be a great educational opportunity, teaching responsibility, not just complaining about a problem.  Notability is still in discussion, but High schools are generally accepted as being notable
— User:FrozenPurpleCube, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CIVIL (Wikipedia:Civility)