Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Rosenwald
No {{U|Jeff5102}}, it is not just you.  Other people recognize that a perceived POV problem is a bad reason to suggest deletion.  I did a google search, contrary to what the nomination seems to assert, there are references.  Nomination seems to be written from a serious misconception as to the meaning of .  Nomination complains that the references are biased.  This is why we have policies and guidelines to help us write neutral articles that are based on RS that weren't written to comply with wikipedia neutrality in mind.  Practically no RS aims to measure up to wikipedia neutrality standards.  So we attribute opinions to those who offered them
— User:Geo, 19:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)