Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump email controversy
WP:Boomerang|Boomerang, {{u|Bozzio}} - |Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point.  If something is |verifiable and covered by multiple |reliable sources, we don't |censor it just because |you don't like it. The article is perfectly valid for inclusion in WP, per numerous policies, though of course it can benefit from expansion. Censorship of Trump articles seems to be an ongoing thing with his supporters (just now restored a working reference someone had deleted from the article). Apparently we can't even include his upcoming court hearing for rape of a minor because someone wants to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations#RfC:_Jane_Doe_content discuss it first, even though the hearing and allegations have widespread coverage! (Question for the proposer on the subject of bias - is s/he trying to keep out the latest FBI investigation of Clinton emails from ''that'' article, even though those allegations '"coincidentally" sprung up in the week before the election' too
— User:Bastun, 09:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)