Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jason Allen
as lacking significant coverage in |reliable, third-party sources, per |general notability criteria. No evidence of satisfying  or  notability guidelines. The subject is an independent filmmaker, musician and bit player, but has not yet received sufficient coverage to merit inclusion in an encyclopedia. It's great the subject won some small film fest awards, but the only source I've found so far that is not affiliated or a PR site is http://archive.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/02/17/20090217wvpeomovie0217.html this blurb in the ''Arizona Republic''. If {{u|AtlasAlmanac}} can provide more significant, ''sourced'' coverage, notability may be clearer. From the intimate, in depth (unsourced) coverage and the defensive tone above (as well as allegedly creating :File:Michael Jason Allen.jpg|this promotional photo), I feel AtlasAlmanac may have external connections with the subject, and would refer them to Wikipedia's |Conflict of interest guidelines and policy on |paid contribution disclosure
— User:Animalparty, 21:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:COI||WP:PAID (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)