Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ 1151
this object clearly fails . Per : "Unless the astronomical object is the primary, or one of the primary, targets of a study, then such a study should not be used to support the object's notability." Most of the sources in SIMBAD are of the catalogue nature and do not provide substantial coverage. I could not find substantial coverage in any scholarly paper. At best, you're going to find data points in tables. For example, Delfosse et al. (1997) has two table entries and no mention in the text.http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A%26A...331..581D Red dwarf stars are a dime a dozen; they don't all need coverage
— User:Praemonitus, 21:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NASTRO (Wikipedia:Notability)