Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of state terrorism by the United States
without prejudice to recreation. Notability is not a suicide pact to keep atrocious articles and I seriously distressed to see it used in such a fashion more and more often. Notability simply says that that this ''topic'' is notable for inclusion. It does not indicate that we need to keep articles that are in such a dire state as to be nearly unsalvageable. I don't think anyone is disputing that the ''topic is notable''. Arguments to keep based purely upon notability ignore the arguments being made for deletion. Making notability the be-all end-all for keeping an article not only flies in the face of good sense, but also runs contrary to multiple principles and policies (as an easy example, 
— User:Vassyana, 08:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)