Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (2nd nomination)
I've read through much of the discussion above, and frankly the "delete" reasoning is entirely unconvincing. Yes, the list needs some cleanup and a clearer definition of inclusion criteria, but neither of those is a reason to ''delete''; some people seem to be forgetting that "needs cleanup" is not a reason for deletion and |we have no deadline here. The claim that there is no relation between Pilgrim dress and geological features is spurious, as there is a connection: both are the subject of things many people believe that are not, in fact, true. The assertion that the list is "indiscriminate" is false, although it does need a clearer definition of scope; Father Goose said it better than I can. The comparison to a "List of common conceptions" is amusing: we have something like that, but to avoid having a terabyte-sized page it's split across Special:AllPages|many articles. The fact that someone made a No true Scotsman argument regarding other encyclopedias' coverage of the topic is similarly amusing. The claim that the list matter is "trivial" or "|cruft" smacks of 
— User:Anomie, 15:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEADLINE||WP:ITSCRUFT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)