Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic Party Rentals
There is at least one reporter, Lisa Hurley, covering this topic ''in depth'' (see, http://specialevents.com/rental/event-rental-industry-reacts-classics-chapter-11-filing, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-389497265.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-447412965.html). In depth coverage goes well beyond our  notability requirement. There is a lot of  coverage of changing personnel and acquisitions but I think bankruptcy and sale of the company is not so routine and has been covered by many reliable sources (see http://www.rentalmanagementmag.com/Art/tabid/232/ArticleId/22574, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-14/classic-party-rentals-files-bankruptcy-over-debt-load, http://labusinessjournal.com/news/2014/feb/17/lenders-group-acquire-classic-party-rentals/. Additionally I don't feel those supporting delete here have done adequate research. There are a lot of press releases but the coverage clearly goes beyond that though you have to sift through a lot to find it. {{u|SwisterTwister}} asserts that his original prod reason, "Basically only sourced by press releases and my searches have certainly found nothing else better aside from 1 local news item, there's nothing else convincing for the applicable notability." is still valid even though I deprodded giving a specific non-PR source and 10 pages of HighBeam search results. {{u|LaMona}} wants to see demonstrable effect of the subject. As the largest player in a rapidly-changing industry, I think that is clearly the case. It may be argued that this is a niche industry but it is a $5 billion niche (http://www.ibisworld.com/industry/party-supply-rental.html) so presumably worthy of coverage here on Wikipedia
— User:Kvng, 14:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)