Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code page 875
I'd look at these as essentially part of the EBCDIC article (or other encodings for other similar pages), offering encyclopedic detail that would be awkward to fit into the main page due to length. I'm not aware of this being ''explicitly'' addressed in policy — but I do think it is ''implicitly'' supported by the documentation of standard practice (admittedly not policies) between  and (depending on how one reads it, see discussion below): note how CONSPLIT wants notability for the split topics, but such is distinctly absent from the practice documented under SIZESPLIT. I don't think  should (or is intended to, probably) discourage content that would be otherwise acceptable if not for being lengthy. —&#123;&#123;u&#124
— User:Goldenshimmer, 01:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIZESPLIT||WP:CONSPLIT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Splitting)