Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biscuits and human sexuality
The nominator is absolutely correct, the subject of the article is artificially chosen and the article is a bad case of , an ad hoc collection of several refs involving the words "sex" and "biscuits" in them. It makes for a good laugh but not for a coherent encyclopedic topic. One can create an article of this kind by taking any two words from the dictionary, running a googbooks search for their combination and then making a collage Wikipedia article from them called "A and B" where A and B can be anything. There is no indication in the references cited that anyone ever actually considered "sex and biscuits" to be a separate and coherent topic worth saying anything about.  For example, the Madonna-Guy Ritchie episode does not even seem to fall into the scope of the article as it is defined in the article's opening paragraph. Madonna claimedhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-559327/No-sex-Madonna--Im-Cookie-Diet.html that Ritchie was trying to lose weight on a "cookie diet" and that the loss of sex drive was one of the side-effects. That does not really correspond well to the article's stated subject: "human sexual behavior involving biscuits or cookies, to pornographic material involving biscuits and cookies, or to the use of biscuits and cookies as a medium for the production and distribution of pornography". The McVitie's story also seems like rather a stretch. A careful reading of the reference provided therehttp://news.scotsman.com/annsummers/Sex-partys-crumbs-of-comfort.2366308.jp shows that McVitie's justified its partnership decision with Ann Summers by demographic marketing considerations ("new cookies are aimed at the same target market - women aged 20-45") rather than by asserting a special connection between biscuits and sex. The ref given for the Mondongo storyhttp://www.mondongo.tv/archivos/quienes/kevin_eng.html also appears to say that Mondongo's choice of buscuits as a medium for making a series of pornographic images was motivated by other considerations and not by asserting some kind of a special link between buscuits and sex. The ref says: "Things stink and no wonder Mondongo has even thought of making a work from out their own faeces. They didn’t, they chose biscuits, this time, equally heinous since they are what the wives of the military would have nibbled on at tea-time as they told stories to their ‘adopted’ children." Again, I don't really see in any of these references a specific discussion of relationship between sex and biscuits as a coherent topic. Overall, the entire subject of the article seems to be an artificially created one to me
— User:Nsk92, 02:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYN (Wikipedia:No original research)