Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draconity
with caveats from discussion in previous thread.  I.e., I agree with Titanium Dragon.  I feel having a WP article on draconity has been valuable, I've contributed to it when I could, and I've been meaning to add better sources for a while.  But many good points have been made on this page.  I'd love to argue the article needs cleanup, not removal, but I just don't see enough verifiable sources right now for .  The best solution is to fold this back into Otherkin, which does at least pass that threshold, and then bring Draconity back if it ever starts getting attention on its own merits
— User:Baxil, 00:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)