Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Zalewski (2nd nomination)
The previous AFD was not helpful in shedding any light as to why it would have so many keeps despite  the lack of reliable sources. Considering that  has become more rigid since then, and despite his large body of work, there has been no real substantiated assertion of notability. As such, I'm inclined side with delete unless someone is able to track down multiple reliable sources
— User:Mkdw, 20:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)