Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Beltzner
The position of "Director of Firefox" is not notable. Sorry, to get a bit , but it does actually help to make my point. Is the Director of IE notable (can't find his article)? How about Chrome? The CTO of Opera has a page, Håkon Wium Lie, but he's notable for his work on CSS. By suggesting that the Director of a major software product is notable the inference is that all his compatriots in the industry are notable. How about the Director of MS Office? And why restrain it to software? Where are the pages for Ford's Director of Commercial Vehicles, the director of Coca-Cola's Fruit juice business? What about the head of HR for ExxonMobil? I use firefox, I love it, but the current director of its roll-out has no place in an encyclopedia. I'm afraid most of the keeps are suffering from |systemic bias: "I use firefox a lot, so the person who makes sure it gets to my desk ''must'' be notable" (obviously, I'm simplifying to make my point..). The firm which does X probably is notable, but the person performing that task at a specific moment in time is not notable unless they do something amazing or something terrible that gets the required depth of coverage
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:CSB (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)