Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Wars spacecraft
I think all three of these lists could be and should be improved upon and expanded, with added citations from reliable sources. But just because the articles need work doesn't mean they should be deleted; |there is no deadline for such improvements. Some individual items on each of these lists may not be notable or worthy of inclusion, but if that's the case, they should be discussed on a case-by-case basis on the list's talk page, rather than just throwing away the entire lists. Some of these are extremely obviously notable (X-Wing, TIE fighter, Trade Federation battleship, snowspeeder, etc.) and others that some would assume are non-notable I suspect reliable sources could be easily found for if effort were put into it. As an experiment, I picked one at random that didn't necessarily seem immediately notable -- the ARC-170 -- and with minimal effort I found on the Newsbank database such sources as The Daily Telegraph, BusinessWire, The Straits Times, The Courier Mail, the Herald Sun, The Courier Mail, The Sudbury Star, The Tribune (Welland, Ontario), etc. (I can't share Newsbank stories online but could provide them upon request if necessary.) I imagine efforts to source, clean up, and expand most of these list entries would be successful. And last but not least, lists like this are useful because it prevents people from making separate standalone Wikipedia articles for every single spacecraft or vehicle in ''Star Wars''; often when such articles surface, the suggestion is to merge them to a list like this. There are numerous reasons these lists should be kept
— User:Hunter, 18:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:THEREISNODEADLINE (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)