Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanksgivukkah
This is a classic version of ecentism if there ever was one. Another case of editors confusing breadth of coverage with depth if coverage. Just because it appears everywhere for a short time does not mean it is going to have the the staying power for it to become truly notable. The sources that are being cited are not news but human interest fluff pieces that are not intended to be serious, in depth pieces that have significant editorial oversight that would be needed to make this ote|notable beyond the the 24 hour news cycle
— User:Jerem43, 17:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:R||WP:N (Wikipedia:Redirect)