Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Lam (physician)
there is plenty of evidence that he is notable, and much of it comes from clearly |reliable sources. The question is whether some sort of hoax has been perpetrated on those sources? To be honest, unless there is clear evidence of hoax (which there doesn't appear to be), I'm not sure it's wikipedia's job to take that into account? Wikipedia usually just reflects what the sources say, unless something is obviously false. I think at this stage the article should be kept and if evidence of a hoax emerges it can be re-written or removed
— User:ThePaintedOne, 11:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)