Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodleigh School, North Yorkshire
Article meets notability in , and . There's no evidence of  and there are more than sufficient eliable sources|reliable sources. I see a lot of shouting for delete, but no effort on the part of these editors to |convince others by using evidence. These arguments to delete seem to derive from attempting to discredit those attempting to improve the article and any attributed comments, and by cleverly equivocating so as to assert that they never said what they never said it said. Rather than making clear positive assertions, AGUEWAVE, , and  are being relied upon. I have no interest in this article, but this AfD is a disaster. Those proposing deletion need to be clear and precise as to their reasoning. Nowhere is this apparent. Special:Contributions/95.149.231.88|95.149.231.88
— [[User talk:95.149.231.88|talk]]) — [[Special:Contributions/95.149.231.88|95.149.231.88]] ([[User talk:95.149.231.88|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic., 21:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GROUP||WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:ADVERTISING||WP:R||WP:CON||WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:ASSERTN (Wikipedia:Notability)