Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Late night anime (2nd nomination)
even though I can fully understand (as a matter of personal fact) why this might be worthy of an article. Without some work to provide reliable sources it fails  and , not to mention  as well. I can't agree that it's an  without evidence to support that assertion, though. Regardless, there seems to have been a consensus in the previous AfD that if sources would be added to support the assertion this article should exist then it would be kept. They clearly haven't been, so the position should be re-considered. Aren't articles supposed to become better sourced, not worse
— User:Rushyo, 23:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NEO||WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:No original research)