Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presskr,Inc
the question is not whether the company is "legitimate" but whether it is |notable, and it is very clear that this company is not. The article is very spammy but that can be fixed with editing by people who are not affiliated with the company - the lack of notability and significant coverage in third-party sources cannot be fixed, however. In addition to the three mainspace articles and one draft mentioned in the nomination, there's also Draft:Pressker and Draft:Presskr.com - an interesting online shopping website, the latter of which has not (yet) been deleted. A few other single-purpose editors have also been involved in creating and recreating the articles over the last six months (but that's a question for SPI, not this discussion.)  Clear conflict of interest, at any rate, as also shown above
— User:Bonadea, 11:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)