Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NYDIG
The ''Forbes'' article is by a staff member and not a "Forbes contributor" and so it passes the |usual test. The ''WSJ'' is lighter in terms of  in that it is mostly about Mass Mutual but the transaction itself is certainly significant and was the work product of this company  so that also satisfied the test from my point of view. Coindesk is not even to be considered but ''Business Insider'' is usually acceptable and I also found an article in https://www.americanbanker.com/news/quontic-bank-and-nydig-launch-bitcoin-rewards-checking ''American Banker''.  I'm satisfied that, whatever irregularities it took on the way to mainspace, it is a notable company according to 
— User:Eggishorn, 22:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:42||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NCORP||WP:42 (Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything)