Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PromptCloud
quite apart from the aggressive attitude of the COI editors toward the nominator, I've just done a reference check - this is a blatantly promotional article, with ''most'' sources being bad. Promotional blogs, sponsored content sites, press releases ... I'm actually surprised there are a few sources that pass . If this is kept, it needs to be cut down to strictly what's in RSes, and will be about a paragraph. However, given the aggressively promotional attitude of the COI editors, I'd advise it be salted as well if deleted, to forestall another round of this. That's the only reason I haven't just stuck a G11 tag on it
— User:David, 17:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)