Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Edward Hayhurst
lack of significant coverage per . If all that exists is the primary source document (the citation), that is not enough for a biography. Conversely, if significant coverage exists, then there is no reason why a Silver Star recipient can't be considered notable, however, unfortunately where it doesn't exist it is not enough to be considered automatically notable per . In the case of Roe it appears like significant coverage might be possible, hence my keep rationale for that article. I found the following: http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&biw=1280&bih=554&q=Elaine+Roe+Silver+Star&aq=f&aqi=g-v1&aql=&oq=&fp=7e7d4b90e5ca0f75 Google web search http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&biw=1280&bih=554&q=Elaine%20Roe%20Silver%20Star&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp&fp=7e7d4b90e5ca0f75 Google Books search
— User:AustralianRupert, 23:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:MILPEOPLE (Wikipedia:Notability)