Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Berger
Again, the notability of the references is purely your own opinion. Fiction is not at all the same as non-fiction. Again, just because some other person doesn't have an article here doesn't mean they or this guy shouldn't, and the relative crappiness or podunkness of the institutions they might work for is also irrelevant. And since you want to further comment on  my exact words were "could be marginally construed as." You are not just a voter, you are the nominator here are you not? Also it is not required for me or anyone else to explain to your satisfaction why this guy is  more notable than some person who is not and consequently has no article written about them. The significance of the body of work is self evident
— User:Aspenocean, 01:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)