Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satna Titus
for 2 reasons -  and undisclosed COI editing. The subject is essentially known for acting in 1 movie. If you look at the references, (http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-cinemaplus/my-parents-didnt-want-me-to-act-satna/article8059299.ece http://www.thestatesman.com/news/entertainment/satna-titus-all-set-for-telugu-debut/128705.html http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150822/entertainment-kollywood/article/satna-titus-says-no-skin-show http://www.americanbazaaronline.com/2016/03/09/satna-titus-set-telugu-debut-757577/ http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/role-in-pichaikkaran-is-vijay-antonys-alms-for-me-satna-titus/), all of these are in the context of the movie and is essentially . There is nothing which suggests that the subject is notable independent of the single movie. This is too soon to have a Wikipedia article. In addition, the article is one in a series of similar articles (about Telugu film actors) where I have observed undisclosed COI editing. I could not find sources online for some of the details in the article. That the article creator managed to get hold of these facts indicates that there is a possibility of contact between the article creator and the subject. Delete as this is not notable and Wikipedia is being used for promotion, violating 
— User:Lemongirl942, 08:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTPROMO (Wikipedia:Too soon)