Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Judaism (2nd nomination)
because the article is much too large to be merged into Judaism and because deleting this article would upset the balance of neutrality with respect to other major religions that have separate "Criticism of..." articles (see Criticism of Islam, Criticism of Christianity, Criticism of Buddhism, Criticism of Mormonism, and many others, all of which are viewable at Template:Criticism of religion).  I don't see any problems with original research in this article; synthesis is arguable, but because of the list-like structure of this article (and the other ciriticism articles) I don't believe the claims of synthesis are valid either.  If they are, they can surely be solved without deleting the article.  Also, with respect to Spartaz's claim that the sources used in this article are not balanced, I'm not aware of a rule in  that states that sources used to verify claims but themselves conform to , only that their use in the article must.  If we did have to reject POV sources, sentences in the  page such as '' Views that are held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views.'' would seem to not make sense
— User:Soap, 11:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)