Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic bitch
The topic satisfies Wikipedia:Notability; the article already lists references from Paper, Time, NYMag, The American Reader, The Guardian, Vogue, and Forbes that are dedicated to the topic. The topic also satisfies , as (1) the phrase is in wide use, and (2) there are treatments in secondary sources. And the article satisfies the following paragraph, , in that it does go beyond what would be found in a dictionary entry; it provides history and commentary on the phrase, both with references. I agree that the article has "issues", in that a few sentences appear to include Wikipedia:No original research|original research, but that problem can be corrected; it isn't a rationale for deletion
— User:Melchoir, 21:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:WORDISSUBJECT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)