Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Lady or Second Gentleman of the Philippines
I think the bottom line here is there is no sourcing, and doesn't appear to be any forthcoming. Aside from notability not being inherited, one of the core tenets of Wikipedia is |verifiability. Notability is also not inherited. If we look at it as a list of people, then  applies, which this fails. If we look it as a definition of a neologism, then  applies, which states: "Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources are not yet ready for use and coverage in Wikipedia." Sourcing is the primary distinguishing characteristic, it seems, between the US version of the article and this one - the US version has a great deal of sourcing even though it is also problematic in it's own way
— User:Waggie, 03:50, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:LISTBIO||WP:NOTNEO (Wikipedia:Verifiability)