Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paws and whiskers
First, new sources: http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbbc/faq/book-club-paws-and-whiskers BBC and http://bookwitch.wordpress.com/2014/02/23/paws-and-whiskers/ Bookwitch at Wordpress. Now, let's go through  one more time. #1, it passes, because of the excellent sourcing in http://www.theguardian.com/childrens-books-site/2014/apr/11/review-jacqueline-wilson-paws-whiskers The Guardian and http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/books/childrensbooks/article4005988.ece The Times, and the BBC. Therefore, #2, #3, #4 and #5 are redundant, because Notability:Books' criteria list is a list of criteria for INCLUSION, not deletion- "A book is generally notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, one or more of the following criteria
— User:Anarchangel, 23:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BKCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)