Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tranceluz
Source searches to qualify !votes in AfD discussions are actually a long-standing best practice and exercise in proper |due diligence on Wikipedia to assess notability, as a cross-check to ensure that topics are ''actually'' notable or non-notable. As per , topic notability is not based upon the state of sourcing in articles. However, in this case, I'm not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources about the subject. It remains best to check for sources, to ensure an accurate encyclopedia based upon the principles of journalistic objectivity, versus having an encyclopedia based upon assumption alone
— User:Northamerica1000, 10:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)