Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secure digital forensic imaging
and put on probation list for one month for the editor (and others) to improve it.  Alternatively, '''wp:userfy|userfy''' it, but with the likely outcome that only the editor will work on it.  As it stands, there is no overt advertising (and therefore little acute harm done) but the article is transgressing , which is unsustainable in the long run.  The article creator says ''"this is a process greater than anything I am involved in."''  I would take this at face value, and ask him to write an article on this greater process, with a broader title, and as a sub-issue it could mention the proprietary system here.  The article creator is evidently a sawy expert content contributor, his comments above demonstrate willingness to conform to WP policies, he shows a healthy measure of good faith - but it is simply his first article.  We should encourage people like him to contribute, outright deletion is not the right thing to do here
— User:Power, 11:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ADVERT (Wikipedia:Advertising)