Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Bergman (2nd nomination)
I don't think the Stansfield source (which briefly summarizes Bergman's beliefs before suggesting a student exercise comparing them with mainstream biology) is enough by itself, and other than that we have no reliable mainstream sources that we need (per  and ) to counter the fringiness of this, let alone to prove sufficient notability. I don't think the talk.origins and ICR sources are reliable and neutral, and as for the Toledo Blade piece, besides not really having much actual information about Bergman or his beliefs, and taking the fringe side of the issue, it's hard to take seriously when it has solecisms like "doctorate in evaluation
— User:David, 02:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)