Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Seth Rich (2nd nomination)
but give serious consideration to a rename and/or eventual merge, if the appropriate namespace can be found).  By even the most conservative interpretation of  this easily meets our community guidelines for notability, with substantial coverage in  that run the gamut of local, nation, and global press.  Reasonable concerns have been raised about not misrepresenting the victim, but that goal is not in any way mutually exclusive with having an article on this notable topic, nor with presenting the whole story of how the murder became caught up in the political spin of the election cycle.  We simply need to exercise the utmost care in how we present and attribute the relevant information--which, with the number of eyes the article now has, will be a more sound process.  This story is out there, and trying to stifle coverage of it/pretending that's not the reality Streisand effect|just will not work, and actually is directly counter-intuitive to the notion of preserving clarity on the topic.  Whether your interest is to protect the victim from being maligned or just to present accurate coverage of the topic, the way forward is with a well-crafted, well-sourced, neutral article--not an effort to cull a notable topic, however sordid the facts surrounding it
— User:Snow, 02:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:reliable sources (Wikipedia:Notability)