Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Walrus Dalzell
Mduvekot is correct that the ''Canberra CityNews'' article, which only mentions Dalzell in a photo caption, is a terrible source. ''The Canberra Times'' article, however, is solid. The 280-word portion of the article in ''The Age'' is not as deep, but to it could be added a similar depth article from ''The Sydney Morning Herald''.http://www.smh.com.au/act-news/canberra-life/commit-no-nuisance-meets-groovin-the-moo-20150407-1mg9li Neither is a trivial mention, and  tells us that where "the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability." I feel that together these three meet , albeit not by a wide margin
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)