Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Forensic Accounting
the citations are either listings and rankings or come from the publisher. So there is not enough independent in depth coverage by reliable sources to meet , still the basic notability guideline if there isn't anything more specific. This is a problem for many journals, so they can be included if reasonable rule of thumb criteria are met that indicate that we definitely should have an article on it (which is the general idea of secondary notability criteria that actually often arise from discussions like this). In this case, I don't see anything here that comes close. The journal is neither old, nor widely distributed nor widely cited nor ranked as top tier. It seems not even to be cited inside Wikipedia itself which should put the idea of having a separate article on what essentially is a source of information for this encyclopedia into perspective. Rather we now have the journal included in the 'See also' section of an uncited article forensic accounting which puts the cart before the horse
— User:Tikiwont, 09:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)