Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Duke University faux sex thesis controversy
per . I agree with Shirik. It is not part of Wikipedia's role to help these passing scandals "go viral." Nominator mentions the GNG, but that explicitly says that "''significant coverage in reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, that a subject is suitable for inclusion...  For example, such an article may violate |what Wikipedia is not''", and that is the case here. There are also BLP considerations
— User:JohnCD, 21:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)