Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel D'Souza
I'd also dispute the characterization of Randwick as a small town — a population of 145K is more than enough that a mayor ''would'' be considered notable if he or she were |properly sourced, because the inclusion bar for mayors is nowhere near as restrictive as the one for city councillors is. But I ''do'' agree with the nominator's characterization of the article's ''content'' — apart from the statement that he ''exists'', all that's here is his purported involvement in a human rights campaign to prevent discrimination on the basis of ''pupil'' size. But that kind of discrimination isn't a thing in the first place — for one thing, pupils routinely dilate or contract in response to ''lighting'' conditions, and apart from a couple of very rare medical conditions ''no'' human being has significantly ''different''-sized pupils than any other. So that's absolutely a pile of bullshit. And the sole source present here is the search results for his name on a search engine, which mostly brings up |primary sources. So no prejudice against recreation if it can be written and sourced ''properly'', but ''this'' version is a clear candidate for the  treatment ''regardless'' of his notability or lack thereof — even if somebody were willing and able to tackle cleaning it up right away, we'd ''still'' have to REVDEL the current content ''out'' of the visible edit history
— User:Bearcat, 14:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)