Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleveland steamer (sixth nomination)
I've seen some horrifying stuff doing my newpage patrol thing, but this takes the prize.  I agree with the nominator in spirit and agree with his reasoning per , but disagree with the salty language.  BTW, I have a lexicon of slang or two that have "definitions" that look just like this article.  Definition plus examples of usage in sentence form or quotation.  All it needs now is called a noun and given an IPA pronunciation transcription.  I highly doubt Wiktionary would take this, as we aren't quite the dumping ground Wikipedians think they are.  Also, I first heard of this in 1992 when it was college slang, not fodder for TV jokesters, and there was no mention of the "steamroller motion of the buttocks."  I have a conventional ass, and mine won't move 360 deg.  It sounds like an embellishment.  I believe the common-sense etymology involving how feces steam in cool temperatures.  Origin in 1992, to me, means neologism banned according to .  This appears to have been a very, very bad article, a real troublemaker, a point of contention, and a source of snicker material for vandals for a very long time.  I must question badlydrawnjeff's neutrality (but not his zeal) as he has consistently voted to strongly keep this without a single rational reason that I can find in six AfD's.  I don't understand "valid pop culture term" as a reason to keep.  This is a contentious issue, and I hope you don't mind having a newbie like me chime in, as perhaps I may offer a new perspective after researching this for a day
— User:Mr, 19:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WINAD||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)