Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumter Mall (2nd nomination)
This is absurd.  A week after the DRV ended, this gets recreated.  It's essentially the same article, with essentially the same set of references, all in a local paper.  So it fails  for exactly the same reasons it failed the first time.  Recreating it was borderline disruptive.  The statement, ''At the DRV and AfD there was consensus that Sumter Mall met '' is equally absurd.  The AfD closing stated, ''The policy arguments clearly show that this is not independantly notable.''  How do you turn that into ''there was consensus that Sumter Mall met 
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)