Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinton donors in the Panama Papers
I was tempted to snow-close this as 'delete', but I concluded there are enough reasonable 'keep' !votes to preclude a snowstorm. So instead I will just say that I hope this gets deleted as soon as the seven days are up. I can't improve on what Bearcat said: ''"No comparable article of this type exists for ''any'' other political figure who is only tangentially connected to the Panama Papers, which suggests that this is very clearly a misplaced |original research attempt to discredit Hillary Clinton by |synthesizing sources to tar and feather her with guilt by association."'' I would add that there is virtually no INDEPENDENT reliable sourcing to support the thesis of some kind of notable association between Clinton and the Panama Papers. Most of the sources do not even draw that conclusion - they are about the individuals - and the few that do make a connection are clearly POV editorializing, not neutral news reporting. Note, too, that the article doesn't even attempt to disguise its POV; the section headings are a dead giveaway. And instead of a normal lead summarizing the article, the first paragraph is a collection of quotes from her - which I guess the rest of the article is then supposed to disprove or something? I agree with Volunteer Marek that the article cannot be improved; it is a BLP violation on its face, and only deletion will fix it
— User:MelanieN, 20:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)