Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Testatika (3rd nomination)
The sources here are all unreliable and unreputable. This is in contradiction to  and furthermore, does not follow the precedent of the Pseudoscience ArbCom case (/PS). Particularly, the sources would not be Acceptable Sources per ARB/PS even if they were Reliable Sources; as they are neither, and it appears that no suitable references exist, the topic is not notable per the Wikipedia definition
— User:Philosophus, 20:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:ARB (Wikipedia:Verifiability)