Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiworld (2nd nomination)
as not providing any |verfiable information ''about the book itself'', supported by |reliable sources that go any way to meeting the |notability criteria for books. The current article talks about the ''concept'' of "WikiWorld" and not the book itself. Searching for the title brings up obvious results using the same term but not in reference to this book or the authors. The main editor may want to have a brief look down the policy of |what Wikipedia is not, as it entirely refutes the points made in their second paragraph, above
— User:Onebravemonkey, 09:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NBOOK||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)