Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William A. Dembski
The reasons given are not reasons for deletion, and all really belong in the talk page for ongoing work on the quality of the article. The  guideline that is cited by the proposer is actually a clarification that neutrality does '''not''' require giving equal balance to both sides. The article as it stands does meet  | neutrality as understood on wikipedia. The idea that the article violates  (Make Necessary Assumptions) is just weird; but in any case it is not a reason for deletion. The article does meet  (Religious Neutral Point of View) just fine, but in any case it is not a reason for deletion. There is no case given here for deletion. ''&mdash
— User:Duae_Quartunciae, 12:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:VALID||WP:N||WP:MNA||WP:RNPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)