Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitt Romney Cranbrook incident
there has to be a better policy on incidents like this. Some of them don't deserve to be covered at all. And giving some of them their own article? That's a clear violation of  weight. Not always. But just because there are enough sources that talk about some random political "scandal" to support a separate article, it doesn't mean there should always be a separate article. Such scandals need to require a certain threshold to be covered at all, let alone in a separate article. I might lean towards deleting or merging
— User:Shooterwalker, 14:27, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)