Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best
per the above. The nominator is confusing the problem of a Wikipedia article advancing subjective opinions, which violates , with the non-problem of a Wikipedia article being ''about'' subjective opinions, which does ''not'' violate . The concept and discussion of "best film" is a notable one, and an article about that concept can comply with all WP policies by summarizing the statements of notable critics and institutions and the results of significant polls. We are therefore not asserting that Film X is the best and citing to Critic Y's list to verify that claim, but instead asserting that Critic Y says Film X is the best and citing to Critic Y's list to verify only that he said it. Though of course one need not defend all such hypothetical "best of" subjects in order to defend this one (see , , and straw man), I would imagine "best song" would also fit that bill as a suitable subject matter in the same way (cf. :Category:Lists of rated songs, Albums considered the greatest ever), and even "best color" may have merit in some specific contexts such as an article about the popularity, critical assessment, and psychology of certain colors and color combinations in interior decorating or fashion
— User:Postdlf, 14:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV||WP:OTHERCRAP||WP:ALLORNOTHING (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)