Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Patrick
I did not read the wall above, so maybe some of these arguments have been made already. Basically, Patrick is a junior academic with only a few independent publications that are not (yet) highly cited. (I would not count publications like the 2006 Science paper heavily, since that was several years ''before'' she earned her grad degree, so it's likely her role was very minor.) It seems the vitamin D story was a news blip for a time and almost all of the references are either a cull of the media community for this story or blogs and other web ephemera. This seems to be an obvious case of 
— User:Agricola44, 17:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)