Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medio Ambiente y Urbanización
to ''Environment & Urbanization''. Like Chris, I'm amazed that an unsourced stub made it through AfC. There is absolutely no evidence that this is "successful and highly regarded" and contrary to what {{u|Rhino209}} claims, Scopus ''does'' include journals in other languages than English (as do the Clarivate Analytics databases). Looking at GScholar I don't see anything indicating notability. Some articles have received some citations, many more haven't been cited even once. That the sister publication or the publisher are notable is |absolutely irrelevant. In short, there's not a shred of evidence that this is notable and how someone can !vote keep for something that is completely unsourced (with only an external link to online content) is beyond me. Any worthwhile info present in this stub is already present in the article on the sister journal, so a merge is not necessary. Unless significant sources turn up (in Spanish or other languages), this is an utter fail of NJournals or GNG
— User:Randykitty, 09:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)