Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Stink (Gilmore Girls)
per the reasoning of Extraordinary Machine and Hiding.  WP:NOT is policy.  The article violates that policy.  And there is no sign that there are any reliable, independent sources that we could use to add "real-world context and sourced analysis" to the article as required by WP:NOT.  No need to redirect (unlikely search term) or merge (what information is there to merge?).  Responding to folks above who cite "precedent" as a reason for keeping:  Wikipedia is not a court.  Each subject is treated individually, on its own merits, i.e. are there enough reliable sources independent of the subject to write an article.  Even  emphasizes that "This page is not policy."  If people find ''arguments'' made at past AfD's convincing and relevant to this AfD, then repeat those arguments.  But ''outcomes'' of past AfD's have nothing to do with this one.  Anyway, precedent is not uniform on episode articles, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Merry_Fisticuffs_(Gilmore_Girls)|this (cited by Salad Days) or Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pieface_%28The_Buzz_on_Maggie_episode%29|this
— User:Pan, 15:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AFDP (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)