Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potions in Harry Potter (4th nomination)
This is a disruptive re-nomination per , being a |pointy spinoff from the current RfA.  The nomination's claim that work is impossible is blatantly false.  For example, I recently added a relevant photograph.  This was taken in the real world where Potter re-enactment and memorabilia is a billion dollar business – there are entire shops that sell nothing else.  And there is extensive literary analysis of the potions in works such as ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Literary_Allusion_in_Harry_Potter/8P8nDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1 Literary Allusion in Harry Potter''.  I have made a start on identifying and using such sources but it's a thankless task while the nay-sayers who complain about |no effort, don't do any work themselves.  The applicable policy here is  which states that "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page.''"  As this is clearly possible then that's what we should do
— user:Andrew, 11:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DELAFD||WP:POINT||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)