Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Goldstein
per : "...include '''only''' material relevant to their notability, while omitting information that is irrelevant to the subject's notability." - most of this information in this article is not relevant to the subject's notability. Also, "Any such potentially damaging information about a private person, if corroborated by multiple, highly reliable sources, may be cited if the Wikipedia article states that the sources make certain "allegations", without the Wikipedia article taking a position on their truth." This article does not satisfy these requirements. Goldstein is still known for only one thing. Walker was featured on 60 minutes, etc. There is not even a file photo for Goldstein in any articles about him, all of which are for only ONE thing, which provides for deletion of the article as per . The subject of this article is not notable according to the guidelines (thousands of people are charged with aiding and abetting to gain unauthorized access to a server, and they do not have a Wikipedia article). Much of this article is written without verifiable sources. Some of the sources that are included are dubious at best; for example, the article in "The Register" used as a reference relies solely on information provided by other (probably rival) hackers. Additionally, this article was written by an individual with a vested interest in disparaging the subject of the article. For these reasons, this article should be deleted
— User:Cypher55, 02:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPF||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)