Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christabel (2002 film) and James Fotopoulos
James Fotopoulos meets .  The https://www.google.com/search?q=%22James+Fotopoulos%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 coverage of he and http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0288188/filmotype his works meets  and thus .  And while his multiple http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0288188/awards awards may not meet , so what? The filmmaker already meets the |primary notability guideline. His film Christabel (2002 film)|''Christabel'' has received the requisite coverage (even if most is negative) to meet . IE: http://www.austinchronicle.com/calendar/film/2002-11-05/141067/ ''Austin Chronicle''  http://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/3031/ ''Film Threat''  http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/328869281.html?dids=328869281:328869281&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Apr+27%2C+2003&author=Patrick+Z+McGavin%2C+Special+to+the+Tribune&pub=Chicago+Tribune&desc=Prolific+filmmaker+sticks+to+non-commercial+style&pqatl=google ''Chicaho Tribune'' and others (some behind paywalls). I can appreciate someone thinking an addressable issue as artspam, but what sort of |search was made to uncover |available sources even if not used in these articles?  Yes, these articles needs work.... but deletion of improvable topics rarely improves the project. What makes a better Wikipedia is actually addressing addressable issues
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 02:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:FILMMAKER||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:BEFORE||WP:NRVE (Wikipedia:Notability)