Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Fand training camp (4th nomination)
I would have preferred to see the previous AfD to have taken to DRV (in that AfD even the article's creator has agreed that there is not enough coverage for the stand-alone article on the topic to exist, so it really should have been closed as "delete"). As it is, there is nothing in the nature of significant and detailed coverage of this camp by independent sources. At most we have a few brief mentions.  As noted above, the NYT ref does not really qualify as "coverage" by NYT - rather they posted a copy of some official documents - certainly not the same as if a journalist wrote an article at least mentioning the camp. Moreover, there is a long-established WP convention that judicial documents, such as trial transcripts, court opinions etc, do not qualify as "coverage" for  purposes, even though they may be used for  purposes. I think the same principle applies to official judicial documents like the Combatant Status Review Board transcripts
— User:Nsk92, 09:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)