Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poppler (software)
I don't know why Karnesky can't paste search results, but http://news.google.com/news?q=poppler+xpdf+OR+evince+OR+okular+OR+vindaloo+OR+ePDFView the google news search he describes gets no hits, and, of the hits on http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=poppler+xpdf+OR+evince+OR+okular+OR+vindaloo+OR+ePDFView google scholar, most are - as Karnesky himself points out - incidental mentions only; they do little more than verify that a library of this name exists and that it has something to do with rendering pdfs.  These are exactly the sort of non-sources the "significant coverage" requirement of the |general notability guideline excludes.  In particular, |just because someone forks notable software, that doesn't make his fork notable.Only two hits, http://is.muni.cz/th/143058/fi_b/bakalarska_prace.pdf and http://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~jw209508/papers/thesis/thesis.pdf, seem to mention it in any detail at all, and as I speak neither Czech nor Polish (and machine translation is worthless for papers such as these), I can't properly assess them.Should not be redirected; disambiguated redirects usually have very little use.  I'd say to just mention it on the Poppler disambig instead, but if Poppler (software) goes away, it should itself turn back into a redirect (to The Problem with Popplers, I suppose, as the original target's been deleted, but that's a matter for Talk:Poppler). &mdash
— User:Korath, 07:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:INHERIT (Wikipedia:Notability)