Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Luke Lutheran Church
I appreciate your comment and it has been most informative. What's in  appears more to be about things or stories that absolutely no reliable source (or potentially none at all) exist. I can't agree that would hold true for a place, which is obvious that someone could visit it an find that it currently exists (and that would be inheritly a reliable source). That is covered in the central discussion: '''wrong forum''' &mdash
— User:Dzonatas, 01:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:HARMLESS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)