Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of atheist Nobel laureates
IMO, these should all go, and , an essay not a guideline or policy, contains an exception for singling out one of several equivalents: "Wikipedia recognizes that it suffers from systemic bias (see ). Sometimes the nomination of one of a series of articles that have relatively equal merit would further the bias (e.g., deletion of Fooian this but not XYZian this if XYZian represents the majoritarian culture at Wikipedia." I would think that atheist, Hindu, Jewish Christian, and Muslim nobelists are all potential equivalent articles to rise or fall together to avoid bias
— User:Carlossuarez46, 23:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)