Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paola Pivi
No evidence of notability at all. Curiously Vejvančický, the only person so far asking for "keep", uses straw man arguments by answering hypothetical reasons for deletion that have not been put forward. Nobody has claimed there is "harmful" or "commercial" information, nor has anyone suggested copyright infringement, so Vejvančický's arguments are irrelevant. As for "a notable and interesting artist", "notable" has not been demonstrated and "interesting" is irrelevant: see 
— User:JamesBWatson, 15:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)