Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Merkow
It seems a bad precedent, a deliberate override of the intent of  to delete an article with 60 sources.  Of the sources I read, they were neither related to the subject, niche specific or trivial.  You can't just take this volume of material and put your . . . but, but . . . opinion as a higher level of judgement.  Wikipedia is a worldwide source of information.  This is legitimate, sourced information.  It is not a vanity article, fraudulent or unsourced and clearly falls within the bounds of .  Denying that sets this self-administration system on a slippery slope of tossing a lot of valuable and well founded content
— User:Trackinfo, 03:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)