Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carson Optical
The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria, especially ones like the https://www.tampabay.com/hillsborough/family-extends-its-legacy-with-optical-business-in-brandon-20190103/ this Tampa Bay Times article which relies on an interview, and the interview and quotations in the https://libn.com/2014/06/06/carson-optical-focused-on-ronkonkoma-expansion/ Long Island Business News article as there's no "Independent Content" *about the company* in those and they fail ORGIND. It isn't about the quantity of references but the quality, so adding references about, say, a review of a product where the author claims to have done some research (but actually just cut and paste from https://carson.com/history/ the company website) fails  plus the fact the topic is the company, not the product. Having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails 
— User:HighKing, 13:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)