Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loius Carlet (2nd nomination)
I haven't participated in previous discussions, which there have been two, and I am open to the suggestion that process is being abused in this situation.  However, while I hope one day Mr Carlet becomes notable and more power to him and the union, however, sources 2, 3 are self written and 5 is nothing more than an advertisment for the union's march, source 4 has nothing to say about Mr. Carlet.  Like I said, nothing against the union and Mr. Carlet and I am sure he can be an excellent source as for reports, but I can't see why he is notable under  at this time in his career.  Sorry, Mr. Carlet
— User:XinJeisan, 02:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)