Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linguistics (poststructural)
per Supriya. There is plenty of published work in reliable sources. As for the nominator, whether you think that post-structuralist approaches to linguistics are actually linguistics is completely irrelevant - what matters is that there are specific post-structuralist approaches to language and linguistics, and that the existence of these is |verified in |reliable sources. If 'proper' linguists have decried it as not linguistics, find some sources and add that to the article. As it stands, the deletion rationale is an essay
— User:Mostlyharmless, 10:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)