Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judge Harry Pregerson Interchange
The nomination rationale basically amounts to "I've never heard of it and I'm an authority on the subject, so it needs to go." I am, however, more convinced by Imzadi's argument regarding the significance of the subject's biggest claim to notability. I'm not going to lie; I don't exactly have an argument for keeping this article that wouldn't amount to one of the many |ATA, and if I were an uninvolved user stumbling across this AfD I certainly wouldn't !vote to keep it. I started this article before I ever became involved at AfD, and I know a lot more about Wikipedia policies now than I did then. I'll keep looking for more sources, etc. to demonstrate notability if I have the time before this AfD period is over, but I won't exactly throw a fit if this ends up getting deleted. &mdash
— User:Kuyabribri, 22:36, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATA (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)