Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oligo Primer Analysis Software (2nd nomination)
and '''cleanup''' — The two people seem to meet  with notability shown by having multiple academic works published. Oligo also meets the |general notability guideline with many secondary sources coming from academic sources - which are the most reliable of all the |reliable sources. While I do not like the "footnote abuse," either, that is more of an issue of cleanup rather than deletion. Otherwise, I do not see spam nor evidence of a |walled garden
— User:MuZemike, 17:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GARDEN (Wikipedia:Notability)