Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dacian script
I think... Protochronism superficially looks like a suitable destination for Dacian script, but that article has its own inherent problem, if it is to collect other proposed protochronisms: it risks providing undue . I instead propose that both are kept, and that the link to Dacian script is included in a '''See also''' section of Protochronism
— User:Rursus, 18:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)