Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Taneja
Most sources online seem to mention the subject only in connection with his recent exposé about the airline he used to work for, but other than that, he doesn't seem to have any significant notability. Seems like an example of . The relevant notability guideline, I believe, is , and the subject clearly doesn't qualify. The guideline is unambiguous; the person in question must have a "large fan base or a significant 'cult' following." The guideline does mention a few other criteria for general entertainers, but they are not relevant here. It's also worth noting , which although is not a binding policy or guideline, does contain helpful information, including: "The subscriber count on the subject's YouTube channel is considered a primary source and is also subject to change (there's nothing to guarantee that the x million subscribers might all suddenly unsubscribe, even though that may seem far-fetched). So editors like to see the subscriber count mentioned by a secondary source, which comes with the advantage of being a point-in-time record of that count." However, I have not been able to find |reliable sources that document the subject's subscriber count, which is indicative of a lack of notability. The few subscriber counts I have found for him are either self published, or are tabloid news articles
— User:Puzzledvegetable, 19:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:ENT||WP:NYOUTUBE||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)