Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur (3rd nomination)
This is a well-referenced, well-written, and well-developed article, with numerous reliable sources for each of the sections that deal with real-world information, namely Development and Reception, making it pass  by several kilometers. Those editors who insist that only delete arguments are according to policy are, to assume good faith, going by an older state of the article. Arguments that it's time to "put a stake through" this are not arguments made in good faith, but based on emotions left over from prior arguments
— User:Quasirandom, 14:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)