Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings Colony Shastripuram
I think the key to interpreting  is the phrase: "legally recognised, populated place", as {{u|AusLondonder}} pointed out. However,  I come to the opposite conclusion, since there is no sourcing to show that it is a "legally recognized" place. I can't find it on any census documentation. Therefore it falls to the second category, "Populated places without legal recognition". And in this instance, the coverage in the Hindu seems to indicate that it, just barely, passes . Unlike corporations, which require more than local coverage to show notability, neighborhoods may only have local notability. That seems to be the case in this instance
— User:onel5969, 12:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)