Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archimedes Plutonium (4th nomination)
I've been through this so many times. The mathematics that's now in the article is complete nonsense and badly written nonsense at that. We can argue back and forth ad-infinitum about , but I also propose we can be sensible: This individual has achieved nothing of any scientific value, much less of notable scientific value. Plutonium's not really notable as a scientific crank; his notability if any, is as that of an individual who has become an easy target of ridicule and abuse, and unlike Emperor Norton, he's alive. Couldn't we just leave this guy alone (as has wisely been with other noteworthy living individuals
— User:CSTAR, 21:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)