Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERPLAB
reluctantly - The noteworthiness of this topic may be difficult to judge for the general reader, but the bottom line is that without |significant secondary source material there is neither evidence of notability nor any raw material to construct an article out of. The present version of the article, written by editors with close connections to the subject, is a mix of |OR and primary source material. In short, if it's not been written about in |reliable sources, there shouldn't be a Wikipedia article about it
— User:Rrburke, 17:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOR||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)