Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddhist Geeks
though with the caveat that it http://www.lionsroar.com/after-ten-years-buddhist-geeks-shuts-down/ may be ending.  The existing sourcing is atrocious, but a mild  to the nominator for not finding "significant independent sources."  I did an extremely cursory search and by the second page of results found articles about them not only in the ''Wired'' source cited, but also in ''http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/08/local/la-me-buddhist-geeks-20110808 The Los Angeles Times'', ''https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/aug/09/buddhist-geeks-enlightenment-online The Guardian'', ''http://www.techtimes.com/articles/80857/20150901/podmasters-buddhist-geek-vincent-horn-meditation-modern-world.htm Tech Times'', and ''https://tricycle.org/magazine/buddhist-geek/ Tricycle'' (which is a major mainstream Buddhist magazine).  Those are clearly independent, reliable sources that establish adequate indicia of notability
— User:Montanabw, 19:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TROUT (Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout)