Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terra Kulture
reply|Deb}} I'm fine with objections to the wording or tone. "If a subject is notable and the content can be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." . "When an article on an otherwise encyclopedic topic has the tone of an advertisement, the article can often be salvaged by rewriting it in a neutral point of view."  I think there is room for compromise here. {{reply|Wikicology}} If the sources are to be believed, the art gallery has held 200 exhibitions over the past 10 years and the restaurant hosts readings by leading writers, among other related activities. It looks to me like more than a non-notable restaurant. That's my honest analysis of the subject matter. As for the core policies, see the two links above. Deletion is not the only solution. Are we any closer to consensus with the current version? –&nbsp
— User:Margin1522, 02:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:G11||WP:ARTSPAM (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)