Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sollog (2nd nomination)
Doesn't seem to be notable. Note that almost all of the sources are primary, so much of the article constitutes a synthesis from these (a.k.a., |original research). What would be left is a non-trivial couple of articles by a journalist he antagonised, and little else. I do understand that self-published sources (such as his books and website) are admissible for ''|verifiability'', but they don't count when determining ''|notability''. We don't seem to have multiple non-trivial independent sources to satisfy the notability criteria. And, I must note finally, this is the state of affairs after two years: things are unlikely to improve. &mdash
— User:Saxifrage, 06:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NN (Wikipedia:No original research)