Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arian controversy
An article using contemporary chronicles and the like is actually relying on the most reliable sources.  Anything more recent can only be a commentary on those.  A bit of historiography and the odd citation of modern works providing such commentary might be useful, not ''no way'' should we even think of deleting as substantial and well-sourced article as this one.  In the early days of WP, the use of primary sources was deplored, as it is liable to produce  (commonly called unreliable inventions), but WP has moved on a long way from that
— User:Peterkingiron, 17:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)