Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Bong-han (2nd nomination)
though I suspect the best that will happen with this is that we get a no-consensus keep again rather than a clear keep), for the same reason I gave the last time: no mainstream and scientifically-reliable sources to give a  take on the subject's fringe research. As the nominator notes, nothing has improved about the article, so there's no reason for me to have changed my opinion
— User:David, 06:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)