Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manar Maged
The case appears medically significant and the article focuses on the medical aspects of the case, rather than the sensationalism.  Even though it was mentioned on Scopes, it does not appear to be the subject of an abusive internet meme.  Although WP should respect the privacy concerns of non-public persons (which I think is what the invocation of  above refers to), where the individuals involved do not appear to be concerned about keeping the subject of the story out of the public eye, privacy issues become less of a concern with respect to the information that the individuals are themselves making public.  If I had a child with a rare birth defect I doubt I would take the child on Oprah, but the parents made the choice to do so. There is no need for WP to be more concerned about the privacy of a subject than the subject herself (or in this case her parents) is
— User:ObiterDicta, 16:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)