Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fascists in Christian Clothing: The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
I can best shed light on this because I created it.  I created this to make a point.  Note that point is different than  because this in no way causes disruption to wikipedia.  Yet, when I saw a proliferation of anti-Islamic polemics (some found in :Category:Books critical of Islam) I created a rather borderline notability book about Christianity but made sure its  Amazon rank (381,306) was better than the book that inspired its (639,969).  I was worried about systemic bias because when an encyclopedia has many pretty non-scholarly critical books about one religion and not about others I'm not sure that's a good thing.  It should be noted that there are more critical of Christianity books and hopefully things will even out some, but since it was pretty clear to me from other articles that inclusionist tendencies were winning out in the community I realized that books on this level were not considered notable per AfD voting standards.  The title also plays off of Islamofascism debates but was not an attempt to get the title into greater usage.  I would also not oppose in any way adding (book) to the end of the title of that makes people feel more comfortable
— User:Grenavitar, 14:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)