Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Information Research (2nd nomination)
per Risker and Giano. While related entities might be somewhat notable, PIR fails  as far as I can see. I have a suspicion that NGPOV (navel-gazing point of view) is the major reason we keep this around. We don't like WR, so we keep the article so we can have someplace to talk about Brandt & Co. In the greater world, it's just not that important
— User:Kylu, 03:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)