Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notability in Wikipedia
Wikipedia's concept of "notability" is in itself a |notable topic for an encyclopedia article, as demonstrated by the multiple, secondary |reliable sources in the article. The self-referencing argument doesn't stand. Read Wikipedia:WAWI#Writing about Wikipedia itself, and note that articles about Wikipedia, such as Wikipedia, are acceptable, and only have to meet our notability/encyclopedicness guidelines for inclusion.  The argument that ''we don't have articles on ""reporting standards for CBS News" or "editorial inclusion policies of the Wall Street Journal""'' is an  argument and can be discarded as such, or can be countered with the fact that we ''do'' have articles on the editorial policies of certain publications, such as The Economist editorial stance.  The nominator needs a trout slap and a reminder of , since if there isn't enough material here for a stand-alone article, it should be merged and redirected to Wikipedia. —&nbsp
— User:LinguistAtLarge, 20:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)