Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Harrold
Hasn't really improved since my PROD, where I said: "Promotional article created by SPA. No evidence of notability. This is the version with substantial promotional material removed.  shows little evidence of RS coverage." It would be saveable with sufficient independent third-party RS coverage, but without that we can't really have a BLP
— User:David, 21:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)