Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs of All Time
I somewhat disagree with the notion that this is "a POV article" -- the whole point of |Wikipedia's POV policy is to make sure that '''''the Wikipedia articles themselves''''' are written from a neutral perspective -- the '''''subject''''' of the article does not have to have a neutral perspective (i.e. most movies, songs, books, documentaries, religions, etc., have a definite POV, yet it's possible and acceptable, and expected to have a non-POV article '''''about''''' them). However, I agree with the sentiment that this article lacks notability -- in other words, there really is nothing to write '''''about''''' (..."Rolling Stone published this article about their opinion of the top 500 songs of all time. Yay."). It seems almost |fancrufty -- what Rolling Stone says in their magazine is for their readers to post/discuss in appropriate places (of which Wikipedia is not one). Rolling Stone is not the accepted authority for music rankings -- the Billboard charts are (largely due to the fact that Billboard's methods are quantitative/objective, whilst Rolling Stone's are qualitative/subjective). Again, there really is nothing to write '''''about''''' (..."Rolling Stone published this article about their opinion of the top 500 songs of all time. Yay
— User:Piercetheorganist, 01:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POV||WP:FAN (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)