Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRECA
Certainly neither a candidate for speedy deletion, the claims of significance are credible, nor for uncontroversial deletion observing . I have added 3 {{tl|cite book}}s and 3 {{tl|cite news}}, there's sufficient significant coverage in independent, reliable sources available to pass 
— User:Sam, 08:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRODNOM||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Proposed deletion)