Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay McCormick
Whether she meets the  depends upon the degree the articles about her are mere public relations. (personally I find the ESPN hotties series  somewhat disgusting, but that's not a reason for deletion)  The correct Esquire link is http://www.esquire.com/the-side/qa/lindsay-mccormick-101910,& I reading through it, I class that as PR, despite the apparent respectableness of the publication.     But that does not compel us to have an article if the intent and purpose is promotional entirely, as I think this is.  The nature of the keep arguments above seem to prove it.  I rarely say that as a deletion argument except for what I consider the more outrageous cases
— User:DGG, 05:10, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)