Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Utterback
This was never a speedy due to the assertations made in the text. However, not counting the |Original Research and |biased point of view, (e.g. "is loved", "david on his work" etc.) I struggle to see how the grand claims in the lead match up to any |Reliable Sources. http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/102-2106131-9088947?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=David+Utterback&Go.x=10&Go.y=9 Amazon have no works listed that I can see and http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLR,GGLR:2006-13,GGLR:en&q=David+Utterback Google seems slim - I can't be certain the e-bay refs are even him. Unless some |verifiable information can be found then this looks un-promising
— User:Pedro, 09:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:No original research)