Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitTorrent index comparison
although sadly it is clearly the result of hard work, which I hope the editors should find a home for elsewhere. (1) There are no reliable sources, and it seems to me that the nature of the information presented is that there cannot be reliable sources; we should not see blogs as references; (2) it is original research per , synthesising too much from its sources. An editor posted "... believe that they should both be kept, since this comparison is useful, and exists nowhere else on the internet " which seems to me to confirm this; nothing on Wikipedia should be justified by its not being anywhere else, quite the opposite
— User:Notinasnaid, 08:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)