Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientology 8-8008
I think that the 2 above comments re: a possible Merge meant the existing list, Scientology bibliography - but any material merged (if a "Merge" is the way this AfD is closed, I still support "Delete") should be sourced to / ''secondary'' sources, as opposed to primary self-referential sources affiliated with the publisher of the book
— User:Cirt, 22:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)