Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potions in Harry Potter (4th nomination)
not picky if this winds up a redirect or not.  In terms of Wikipedia practice,  I would ask which is better:  1) Copy-and-paste this into another article and replace it with a redirect,  2) redirect and make sure target had at least a summary of what is in the page, knowing that over time that "summary" may expand and expand until someone decides it's time to split the page, 3) same as 2 but "guard-dog" () the target to make sure excessive expansion doesn't happen, 4) leave things the way they are ('''keep'''), or 5) '''delete''' the page, possibly replacing it with a redirect.  I'm not sure which will be best in the long run, those are the options on the table.  I'm against option 5
— User:davidwr, 19:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OWN (Wikipedia:Ownership of content)