Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Ramsey (artist) (2nd nomination)
I think there's a chance the subject ''might'' pass  but the referencing has to be some of the most dishonest I have ever seen in a Wikipedia article. For example, the article suggests his artwork was bought by Ban Ki-Moon, a statement which is sourced to an article about an unrelated subject with a passing mention at the end that ''another'' source had suggested his work had been bought by, "officials at the United Nations". The vast majority of the biggest claims are ''completely'' unsourced and those that are sourced have been sourced to interviews with the subject where he makes various unsourced and unsubstantiated claims to fame. There are some sources that quote whole swathes of other sources but are used to suggest "multiple" instances of coverage. I'm going to try and clean it up but it's really quite atrocious
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 22:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)