Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Klingon Way
or possibly a selective merge) to Klingon language#Sources.  The author's article is a perfectly acceptable target, but maybe the Klingon article will give readers more info about the language, which is presumably what they're seeking.  There's been a lot of discussion about the sources, but I'm just not seeing how they can establish notability.  Wikipedia requires significant coverage by independent reliable sources, and |the fact that something exists is simply not good enough for an entry in a general-purpose encyclopedia.  I'm unconvinced that the Klingon Language Institute can establish notability, as it's more-or-less Okrand's fan club.  It's like how half of those ''Transformers'' articles are sourced to official fan club magazines.  I'm sure the fan club magazines have lots of useful info, but they can't establish notability by themselves
— User:NinjaRobotPirate, 17:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ITEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)