Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Lou
She definitely meets  and therefore is a WP BLP; we can debate the degree of notability, but her qualification is not in doubt (which I think is the consensus view of this AfD).  No problem with removing specific details from a BLP if it causes distress (as we did on Dhammika Dharmapala), but we would be creating a dangerous precedent (e.g. a WP:WENDYLOU), if a publically known and photographed figure (she is a Prof in a major university http://www.dlsph.utoronto.ca/faculty-profile/lou-wendy/ http://ondri.ca/people/wendy-lou/ https://childstudy.ca/people-partners/researchers/lou-w/ http://www.wlou.biostatistics.utoronto.ca/ https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wendy_Lou http://www3.stat.sinica.edu.tw/scv2008/cv/35.pdf https://ssc.ca/en/ssc-elections-2010-list-candidates http://sam.cufe.edu.cn/info/1087/1550.htm; even her salary is public knowledge http://www.thesunshinelist.com/ca/salary-disclosure/wen-yi-wendy-lou/university-of-toronto), could have a bland BLP of public information deleted because she does not like it, or it causes her distress?  She has her own LinkedIn page? https://www.linkedin.com/in/wendy-lou-33a5161b  How do we progress after such a point?  We have many "controversial" BLPs on WP whose subjects would also prefer it deleted if given the option - how would we respond to their future requests post WP:WENDYLOU
— User:Britishfinance, 17:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPROF (Wikipedia:Notability)