Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postmodern mathematics
to Philosophy of mathematics#Social constructivism. The article is far too unclear and expository, and it is straightforward  in its efforts to collect various ideas and thinkers into a group they never agreed to join. So, how can we better serve our readers? Thinking in terms of  and -R, redirecting to Philosophy of mathematics#Social constructivism keeps the title as a search term but puts the reader in a better position to understand two important pieces of context: 1) where some of the ideas discussed in the current article actually fit in the broader history of philosophy of mathematics, and 2) the distinction between constructivist epistemology (which seems to be the thing that the term "postmodern" is being used to avoid saying in this article) and Constructivism (philosophy of mathematics)|constructivism as used in the philosophy of mathematics
— User:Bakazaka, 01:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:NOPAGE||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:No original research)