Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmel Art Association
I agree that there's nothing here that satisfies , and fifty trivial mentions or namedrops still don't add up to a single bit of "significant coverage."I am also utterly indifferent to protests about "cherry picking the weakest ref."  IMHO, in a deletion discussion, I want to be assured that people are arguing in good faith.  If keep proponents are just tossing up a blizzard of Google hits ''without bothering to check if they provide substantial coverage to the subject in question,'' then they are at best not paying attention, and this is particularly ironic in a discussion where Delete proponents have been accused of wanting to delete this article "at all costs
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''' ]], 18:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)