Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional beverages (2nd nomination)
I honestly think that somone whould take a moment and define what indiscriminate actually means, rather than how it appears to be being used in this discussion. As there is a '''''discriminate''''' inclusion criteria for this list (being a beverage presented in fiction, which is also only fictional). Indiscriminate would be to pull 5 or more disparate things out of mid-air and list them on a page. Like for example if I listed acetylsalicylic acid, Snoopy, Australia, fire, and hard drive all on a page. Then someone could possibly suggest that those 5 are disparate enough as to be indiscriminate information. But a page with clear inclusion criteria, and which ''can'' be referenced with |verifiable |reliable sources, simply doesn't fall into the category of '''''in'''''discriminate information. And incidentally, it's only "can", because, as we're a wiki, the idea is that references will be added eventually. So we only need to  that such references likely exist. And even better, if in doubt - Template:sofixit|go find some
— User:Jc37, 11:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Verifiability)