Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of solitary animals
U|Epipelagic}}, please |be civil and |assume good faith. Of course this list would be useful to some of our readers. Whether it would be overwhelming, or less useful than a category, for the majority of our readers and users, is another question. Upon review, I see how this list could be just ''too much to handle''. On the balance, a category rather than a lost would be much better in this instance. I know that may not be a really cogent argument, but that is what I see now
— User:Bearian, 23:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CIVIL||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Civility)