Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Klingon Way
and '''redirect to Okrand''' in the interim ... or just '''delete''': the cited sources seem to substantiate the book's content Some cited sources are self-published wikis that fail to meet . The Irish Times article does not mention this book at all, and likewise the cited academic journal is about a different Klingon text. The article does not even assert, absent substantiation, that the book is significant -- and, I doubt substantiation for such a claim (for a niche publication over 20 years old) exists. In other words, I believe the subject fails . Still, if someone's interested in working on the article without a looming AfD deadline, perhaps shift it to a willing participant's user space so interested folks can continue to scour for third-party commentary at their own pace and ping the wikiproject page for feedback before a possible re-introduction as an article. Such a rewrite would need to articulate why the book matters, and not just what's inside. But, considering it's a long shot, I don't think it's appropriate for this article to linger in article spaaaaaaaace, the final frontier
— User:EEMIV, 20:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)