Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Lennox
re|SmokeyJoe}}{{re|SportingFlyer}}{{re|Valeince}} '''Here is again another article for your consideration that explicitly talks in detail about our subject-- this time in ''Italian Vogue'' by Barbara Frigerio.''' '''''Vogue Italia'' is independent, reliable, and in the lines extracted from this article, secondary (the words are Barbara Frigerio's own).''' https://www.vogue.it/en/vogue-curvy/glam-and-curvy/2010/03/lola-lennox#ad-image10625. In this article we can extract: Lola is A) A model. B) Daughter of Annie Lennox C) Father is Uri Fruchtmann D) Sister is Tali Lennox E) Her parents divorced in 2000 (already cited in Personal Life section). F) Lola is a singer. G) Lola went to a prestigious music school like her mother Annie. H) That school was the Royal Academy of Music H) She has modelled for Vanity Fair, Jalouse, and Topshop. I) She plays piano and writes music. J) She is from London. Barbara also states her analysis that our subject is a "young fashion icon", is "well-known for her talent in fashion", explains "why she is famous" and that she "sets trends because she is naturally cool". Those are clear examples of the author's own analysis above and beyond all of the crucial information she also provides us in secondary sourcing about Lola's basic information and life that we need for our Wikipedia entry. All of this information is solely and explicitly from Barbara Frigerio's own passages, and are clearly statements that are secondary sourcing. Remember '''as per official guidelines "A source may be considered primary for one statement but secondary for a different one,''' and sources can contain both primary and secondary source material for the same statement." as directly quoted in . This, in addition to the newly discovered article from ''British Vogue'', and the correct referencing from ''Teen Vogue'' alone I believe should settle your desire for secondary sourcing that can be used to build the article's base appropriately per explicit official guidelines, without original research, and establish our subject's passing of . Thanks for taking the time to respond and examine and, again, I hope you find them helpful in your analysis. '''Much love and cheers x
— User:Soulman1125, 09:02, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PSTS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)