Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical response to She Has a Name
others hinted at it above, but with the main ''She Has a Name'' article sitting at only 29K of prose, I don't believe this meets the criteria for . If the main article was at least 50K, I would consider "keep", and if it was at 70K I'd probably go with "strong keep, bad nom" (eg: Canadian drug charges and trial of Jimi Hendrix vs Jimi Hendrix) .... but it isn't, so I can't. Under the circumstances present, since the title is not what I would consider a typical search term, I would go with "delete". However, I believe I should make an exception here as in this case, merging the critical response back into the main article is probably going to be a lengthy and difficult task, and destroying properly reviewed prose and sources so editors cannot retrieve them (via the history) to do the merge is unhelpful - |there's no rush to do it
— NONE, NONE
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:SPINOFF||WP:NODEADLINE (Wikipedia:Content forking)