Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Knight
per Colapeninsula and Mscurthbert; unambiguously meets  and  (4c). If it weren't for the above !vote I'd recommend speedy closure per point #1 of , since the nomination statement is not an argument for deletion. &ndash;&nbsp
— User:Arms, 15:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:SK (Wikipedia:Notability)