Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadym Pozharskyi
per . Notability is ''theoretically'' possible here, but the article as written is far too résumé-advertorial in tone, and far too dependent on |primary sources with no evidence of |reliable source coverage shown — the few references here that ''are'' reliable sources are not ''about'' Vadym Pozharskyi, but simply confirm tangential facts about the company without even once mentioning Pozharskyi's name in conjunction with anything. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source it better than this, but nothing here is good enough to stand in this form
— User:Bearcat, 22:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)