Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four (drink) (2nd nomination)
The sources given include a blog and a press release in an industry-specific publication. This could easily become notable at some point--alcopops are quite popular in the UK, for instance. Need to have a |reliable independent source (or three) which writes about the product. For now, the article is little more than an advert for a product which is not (yet) notable. As far as the previous AfD, it was closed as no consensus, when the only Keep came from the person who added the thin sourcing--a relist would have been more appropriate at the time. Yes, this could have gone to DRV, but I think the suggestion that we keep just because the previous AfD was so recent is flawed. It's similar to AfD arguments of (too soon, not enough edits, too soon after failed).  is not satisfied by the article in its current state
— NONE, 00:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)