Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Really Happened (2nd nomination)
I certainly can't speak for Aeon and I don't really accept non-notable as a reason for deletion, but looking through the first AfD I don't see how What Really Happened meets any of the  criteria.   There was an attempt to justify it per #2, but those awards are very minor "site of the day" type awards.  In my opinion they don't qualify per #2.  There also was an attempt to justify it per #1 essentially arguing that WRH met the criteria per 11 published interviews.  Unfortunately, these interviews were bittorrent, Google Video, and Alex Jones' prisonplanet website.  None of these qualify as non-trivial.  3 more NewsMax cites were added, but none of these articles were ''about'' WRH, they were either mentioned in passing or linked at the end of the article.  Obviously this was ''no consensus'' upon closing, so opinion was split, but I personally see no credible evidence or argument provided that this site meets 
— User:Isotope23, 16:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:WEB||WP:WEB||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)