Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of LGBT slang terms
there are 36 articles on individual slang terms in :Category:LGBT slang and its subcategory, so even if this list were limited to only notable terms there would be enough to merit a standalone list as a complement to the category per , and NOTDICT does not in any way restrict our internal indexing of articles just because those articles happen to be about words. But there's also no requirement for all list entries to be notable, particularly here where listing terms that are at least significant would be informationally integral to LGBT slang per . So we have indisputably valid entries (i.e., the notable ones) and a notable parent topic grouping them (contra the completely unfounded LISTN deletion !votes above; see sources in parent article to show that LISTN is actually satisfied here). Which only leaves us with the problem of what inclusion threshold to maintain, which, given the previous, is a matter for ordinary discussion and editing to resolve, not a basis at all for deletion of the list as a whole. Simply requiring secondary sourcing to verify the usage of the term and its meaning might maintain adequate standards, though editors might decide to restrict inclusion to those terms verified in particular sources recognized as more authoritative. At any rate, that's not our problem to solve here in this AFD. So to recap, keep per , , and , and deletion !voters should be reminded that AFD is 
— User:Postdlf, 18:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CLN||WP:LISTPURP||WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN||WP:LISTN||WP:NOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates)