Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital City Green
per nom. This is very trivial subject, of course, but that aside BHG makes a good point. Even a cursory review demonstrates the material here is not built up on any kind of  at all, and as such should not be constituted as an encyclopedic topic under our guidelines. I understand fully BHG's frustration, as a result, because she has noted with exceptional clarity the problems with the sourcing of this article and yet has been handed a fine dose of  &  in return (as the above comment exemplifies
— User:Eusebeus, 09:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OSTRICH||WP:ATA (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)