Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua Anio Novus
no importance" is simply a matter of opinion.  Personally, I don't find a number of celebrities to be of great importance, but they are covered by numerous reliable sources, and therefore are |notable, facts about them are |verifiable, and thus they meet our inclusion criteria.  Likewise, there are plenty of sources that treat the Aqua Anio Novus: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40310747.pdf this paper, along with a number of others discussing the "four great aqueducts of ancient Rome" is on jstor; http://www.idrogeologiaquantitativa.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Pubb_1996_water_supply.pdf this, on Roman aqueducts more generally, appears to be publically accessible
— User:Caeciliusinhorto, 11:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)