Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canadian post-grunge bands
Eh. Well, the sources referenced by 's second bullet point don't ''necessarily'' have to be cited in the article. If you visit a random list of bands, say, odds are most of the entries you see will not have sources. Ideally they all would, but because lists are commonly restricted to items with Wikipedia articles, the presumption is that the requisite sources can also be found in the band's article. If it's just a matter of pulling a reference from one article into another, that's not a great reason for deletion. On its face, this seems like a reasonable list. If someone were to start splitting up List of post-grunge bands into country-based sublists, then eh. The problem, however, is that it's not a necessary or consistent convention to do so, and this anomaly looks to be based entirely on an ''unreliable'' source per the lead. Allmusic's genres in the sidebar are not considered reliable sources. The content of the staff-written biographies can be, but this list clearly came from the sidebar (e.g. http://www.allmusic.com/artist/artificial-joy-club-mn0000929931/biography Artificial Joy Club's entry doesn't mention post-grunge except for there). Given it's only based on that one source, and given it's an unnecessary spin-out of the main list, it doesn't quite seem worth keeping. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 21:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LISTPEOPLE (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)