Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ducentillion
not a standard word. |verifiability problems. Not in http://www.bartleby.com/cgi-bin/texis/webinator/ahdsearch?search_type=enty&query=ducentillion&db=ahd&Submit=Search standard dictionaries. Although it appears in names of large numbers no citation for its use is given. Google references seem to me to be websites echoing each other. No hits in http://books.google.com/books?q=ducentillion&btnG=Search+Books&hl=en Google Print. No hits in a9.com book search for "ducentillion." Per  #Wikipedia is not a crystal ball|words formed on a predictable numeric system (such as "septenquinquagintillion") are not encyclopedic unless they are defined on good authority, or genuinely in use
— User:Dpbsmith, 17:40, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)