Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kush (word)
per nominator, per , and much of the content and sources fail . Also, I don't agree that most of the definitions have their own article. It appears to me that half the words and definitions are linked to a small number of the same articles. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a repository for a collections of |indiscriminate information. This page probably needs to be |written in prose, if that is possible; but that is only possible if this word was actually the subject of |reliable sources
— User:Steve, 06:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NAD||WP:VERIFY||WP:INFO||WP:PROSE||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)