Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Environmental
I'm AkankshaG's argument about "deletionist means article is good" is tough to take. There ''are'' the three sources given, but Inc is minimal, the CSM article is acceptable, and the Press Democrat article is onyl 50% about CJ Environmental. I thought perhaps the news articles would be under http://www.google.com/search?q=CashforGoldUSA&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=nws:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn "CashforGoldUSA", but that just shows a press release and makes me suspect this is a company strong in marketing and capturing a current meme, not a company truly satisfying , not to mention taking advantage of the Cash4Gold name. So I say delete. Admittedly, about 50% of my !vote is my gut feel and because I worked on creating the Cash4Gold article, about 50% of it is based on Wikipedia guidelines
— User:Tedder, 00:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)