Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rio Blast
in some capacity.   is not a valid reason for deletion.  Per  and , as the subject is not a hoax nor libelous and as the nominator even points out a valid merge and redirect location exists, that is what we would do.  Obviously the name is plausible for editors to have created the article and worked on it and this character was apparently http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=%22Rio%20Blast%22%20%22Masters%20of%20the%20Universe%22&oq=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi worthy of getting a toy in addition to being on the show.  No valid reason exists as to why we would not therefore at worst redirect with edit history intact.  Someone can make a reasonable case for such a merging or redirecting, but there is no reasonable case for redlink.  "I don't like it" just doesn't cut it.  Sincerely
— User:A, 17:57, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:JNN||WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)