Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding animal (4th nomination)
I concur with Cyclopia, this is a case of  rather than original research or synthesis. The fact that prior deletion requests resulted in a ''speedy keep'' the last two times this was proposed should have clued in the nominator
— User:Marcika, 16:37, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)