Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network for Good
VERY poorly sourced as it relies almost 100 percent on it's own website. It fails the notability test, and a "significant web presence" is easy to '''promote''' through those NY Times articles (and therefore don't qualify as reliable sources per 
— User:Dragonfire, 12:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ADVERT (Wikipedia:Advertising)