Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superpanopticon
Certainly notable, but seems to fall foul of .  ''If'' this undoubted neologism for a very real concept has achieved any sort of currency, then the article needs to demonstrate that clearly ''before'' we can regard it as acceptably encyclopedic
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)