Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Resig
Reasons for a speedy keep decision are… The nominator… fails to advance an argument for deletion." "Possibly NN person" is ''not'' a deletion rationale. It's clear that the nominator paid no attention to , or they would have found hundreds of http://www.google.com/search?q=%22John+Resig%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 Google News hits, http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22John+Resig%22 Google Books hits, ''and'' http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22John+Resig%22 Google Scholar hits. Hell, just looking at the article's Talk:John Resig|Talk page should have been sufficient
— User:DoriSmith, 02:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)