Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business logic
Term is not yet adequately defined by the industry to merit an encyclopedia article.  Too many of the references described the term as needing definition.  This makes this a neologism in the process of forming.  Per , we need treatments in ''secondary'' sources to have a Wikipedia article.  We aren't there yet; the online Tech Encyclopedia link comes close, but to my eyes doesn't pass muster.  ''Disclosure'' to my shock and surprise, my job is actually relevant to the discussion of this article.  We don't highlight this term in our marketing materials (using "business rules" instead because we have a patent related to that), but at least one of our competitors is being puffed by one of the links in the article, and I feel the closing admin ought to know this
— User:GRBerry, 00:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)