Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect rhyme
You stated, "My reading of wp:AFD (ie: If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD.) says this isn't a good candidate for AFD, as we have explained how to fix it." If you read AfD again, notice that it is for ''discussion'' of whether an article should be deleted or not. Among the valid deletion criteria are articles not suitable for an encyclopedia, and it links the  policy. On , you will see among the various examples DICDEF (it's almost the first example). This article appears to me (and others as you can see) to be a violation of the  policy, and so it's very appropriate to bring to AfD to discuss whether it should be deleted or not
— User:Atama, 01:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOTDICDEF||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)