Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Banks Elliott
more or less per DGG and .  First, I think there is a direct argument that BASIC has been shown here. I think the Miller source and the CAIRN source (later removed) both are in-depth, third-party, reliable sources. I recognize that "in-depth" is subjective, however, and the rest of my argument will proceed allowing that people can have different views on that bar
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)