Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas E. Bearden
and redirect to MEG per  (and spirit of  lack of independent notability. Despite talk-page promises that there are sources attesting to notability of this person himself apart from just being someone involved in a notable field or device, none appear to have been provided. He may be lots of things to lots of people and have the potential to...develop or become important in his field according to independent sources, but according to  at this time, does not appear to be. Promising-future-notable people and not-yet-discovered geniuses are out of scope for WP. We really ''are'' a mainstream publication, or at least strictly require reasonably mainstream or at least independent sources
— User:DMacks, 03:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)