Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index:
As for the secondary argument "the lack of notability of almost all the winners" I linked to around a dozen people and/or projects/products that were not already linked, resulting in 72% of the winners being linked. Apart from being moot the argument to me appears like a reversed . As for the primary argument "no evidence given that this is a notable award" the |search for sources reveals an abundance. I've added 100+ sources, 17 of these being Google Book hits, numerous of the others being from national newspapers from several different countries. "Largest/biggest/important/influential" not to mention "the Nobel Prize of Design" clings to this award. Subject is notable. I support a move to INDEX: Design to Improve Life per  and have applied MOS to that effect
— User:Sam, 08:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ITSA||WP:BEFORE||WP:COMMONNAME (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)