Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macadamia nuts controversy
this event has spurred considerable social commentary, as evidenced by the links provided by Blue Rasberry.  Analysis like that is the hallmark of an event that goes beyond a "temporary news story" to a topic of lasting importance...  Many of the above arguments are just plain wrong.  For example, the amount and nature of English language coverage is completely irrelevant.  Any language is acceptable - it is the nature of coverage that matters. (See : "Sources do not have to be available online or written in English.")  People saying it should be covered at Heather Cho are getting BLP1E backwards - the event, not the person has preference in most cases.  And people citing NTEMP ("Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of 'significant coverage' in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage") as a reason for deletion are either very confused or didn't read what they cited.  It is a guideline that only makes sense as a keep argument (normally used at a date well after coverage has ended
— User:ThaddeusB, 15:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)