Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Kaye Tardif (2nd nomination)
Our notability and sourcing standards have been tightened up considerably since 2006 — back then, we didn't have anywhere near as clear a set of rules for distinguishing a reliable source from an unreliable one as we do now, but rather permitted more or less ''any'' source at all that verified the content, inclusive of the author's own self-published website, to support notability. (To be fair, that was before people started trying the "I'm notable because I'm on Facebook!" thing that finally forced us to get stricter about what's a notability-supporting source and what isn't. Which isn't to say people weren't already trying to game the system in other ways, but we hadn't built up the quality control standards to effectively combat them yet. But I digress.) But under  mk. 2018, she has no notability claim or reliable source coverage strong enough to still be considered notable enough for a Wikipedia article
— User:Bearcat, 16:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)