Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where Troy Once Stood
The editors above are focusing on the ''quality'' of the book. The issue here is not quality but notability. We have proposed guidelines for the notability of books at . In order to be notable a book really needs to generate interest outside of its own field - yet this book generates only about 600 google hits http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Where+Troy+Once+Stood%22+-site:wikipedia.org+-site:answers.com&hl=en&lr very few citation from Google scholar http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Where+Troy+Once+Stood%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search, is in only about 300 libraries out of 10,000+ in woldcat http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/22907688&referer=brief_results. The only review cited by the article is from Library Journal, a publication which reviews thousands of books a year with very limited regard for notability and is specifically disqualified from establishing notability per . There is no evidence so far that this book has been the subject of significant works in publications serving a general audience as required by 
— User:GabrielF, 16:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BK||WP:BK||WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)