Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clovis library shooting
at the time of the first AfD being submitted, it was legitimate, but the coverage this received is certainly sufficient - multiple high quality sources at a national level. The key consideration is , point 1: the article is not likely to have "enduring historical significance" and quite possibly lacks "significant lasting effect" (though I would say it does meet ). However, point 2 is met - significant USA-wide coverage
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)