Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Service codenames
but ''not'' per nom.  This is at the moment just a list, and not a useful source of information on things such as how the codenames are given or when they are given.  However, I am certain that a point like "some of the information in this article is wrong" isn't a reason to delete it, as that's not what  says.  It says that reliable sources must be found.  So ignore the  part of the prod nomination
— User:Wittyname, 21:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)