Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of the Doctor Who universe (2nd nomination)
Instead of nominating this article here, you should at last have ''tried'' to fix the article. After all, problems with sourcing and/or OR can and should be addressed by editing and  says so. They are not a reason for deletion. The article has, at this moment, 298(!) different sources and you picked a single one as an example why everything should be deleted. A lot of those entries listed ''are'' indeed sourced to reliable sources and/or primary sources after all. The list serves a valid purpose for readers who wish to place the episodes of the show in context. The article does not fail  (|vague waving there does not excuse not reading what the page is about), as it explicitly says "... as an article grows, editors often create Summary style spin-offs or new, linked article for related material. This is acceptable, and often encouraged, as a way of making articles clearer and easier to manage." As for , it simply doesn't apply here and you have not explained why we should think so.  does not apply because as a part of the MoS it describes ''how'' to write about fictional topics not ''whether'' to do it. As for linking to another AFD, remember that every article should be based on its merits. Regards
— User:SoWhy, 17:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:NOTPLOT||WP:WAF (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)