Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Struldbrugg
per Piotrus. There's nothing other than short  style mentions which aren't enough to prove |notability. There isn't significant coverage in reliable third party sources. I would support including a dictionary definition at a relevant article about the fiction if someone bothers to add one. But I can't call for a merge if we're talking about a section that only exists hypothetically. Either way there isn't sufficient coverage to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline
— User:Jontesta, 22:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DICTDEF||WP:N (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)