Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human disguise (2nd nomination)
with an admonishment to the nominator per : "''If an article is frivolously nominated (or renominated) for deletion, then editors are justified in opposing the renomination. Frivolous renominations may constitute |disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point, especially when there was a consensus to keep it in the past, or when only a short time has elapsed since the last nomination.''".  A renomination that ignores the consensus reached at DRV disregards the instructions set forth at . Perhaps if the nomiator had waited several months and was then able to make note of changes or lack thereof to the article, his nomination might have merit. But to return it to AFD with a rehashing of the same arguments from the 2-week-old deletion dicussion because of his diagreement with the consensus of the DRV keep, does not improve the project
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 23:49, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:POINT||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)