Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HHO gas (4th nomination)
As i'm not a scientist I can't speak to issues about the article's content. I however would vote delete on WP procedural grounds, as three previous community consensus decisions have gone delete. The only reason this article still remains is because various authors are gaming the wiki to |disrupt it and make a point. While the merge suggestions may have some merit, all that will happen is that it will drag POV editors over to these articles and cause them to get worse. As for a rename, again this will only perpetuate the problems
— User:Thewinchester, 11:19, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)