Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punchline (character)
This nominator description is extremely misleading, to say the least. It literally says "This article lacks reliable secondary sources except for the reliable secondary sources it cites." And it lobs out the accusations of "fancruft" and "primary sources" even though there are ''no'' primary sources used and there is literally no cruft or plot summary in the article ''at all''; it's entirely written from a real-world perspective. The article is a stub right now, which can and should be expanded in the future, but that's no reason to delete it. The article is supported by reliable secondary sources that provide significant coverage, which establish that it passes , and there are a plethora of other sources out there (more and more each day) not currently in the article that could be used for future expansions, including (but not limited to) the stories below my signature
— User:Hunter, 12:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)