Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GALES
per the above. I agree, if and when the organization really takes off, an article would be welcome. But, as it stands, there isn't enough coverage to justify keeping this one. |Usual caveats apply, of course, as the organization can (and likely will) grow and become more notable over time
— User:Ultraexactzz, 14:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:USUAL (Wikipedia:Usual caveats)