Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drill and tap size chart
This table may be a 'synthesis' because it is a compilation of other sources, but it is '''not''' a |synthesis in the sense of the linked WP article.  The purpose of the compilation was not to 'imply a conclusion' or 'advance a position'.  See this article about hese_are_not_original_research#Compiling_facts_and_information|compiling information.  I admit (again) that wishing to keep this around because it's useful is a naive position.  However, there are other pages I use that are quite similar, e.g. Comparison_of_AMD_processors, another page of tables with data compiled from other sources.  It was nominated for deletion in 2008, but the debate was about redundancy, and even under scrutiny, other arguments from this discussion that could have applied to that page were not advanced.  An argument that still stands for this page's deletion is the claim that the metric numbers are incorrect, but this could be fixed.  I'm afraid I don't understand the argument about 'encyclopedic context', but would appreciate a pointer to an explanation of the term
— User:Butchwax, 17:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:T (Wikipedia:No original research)