Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Robert Plumlee
as per Viriditas, Location, and Tom Harrison. Using cherry-picked primary and self-published documents to accuse anyone of  criminal activity is not acceptable practice, ever. (Note: by the time I viewed the article, the only citation left was the one from ''Playboy'', referenced above by Location. However, the history shows the FOIA requests and the external links to conspiracist and other dubious sites.) I doubt it would be possible to ever construct and article about this individual which complied with BLP, NPOV, and RS guidelines and policies, and although  is only an essay, this is a prime example of it, since it's not about the subject, it's about the others whose alleged dirty deeds he has abetted
— User:Horologium, 03:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)