Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Víctor M. Marroquín
There's no indication that Marroquín satisfies , or even . I've tried find sources which might help better establish notability, but have not had any luck at all. I was able to find {{url|elcomercio.pe/politica/actualidad/victor-marroquin-congreso-unicameral-parche-noticia-1959203}}, but it's an interview so it's not really sufficient for establishing notability. I've posted about the article at :Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru#Víctor M. Marroquín, but have not gotten a response. I started a discussion about the article at :Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive250#Víctor M. Marroquín, but that thread was archived without anything being resolved. I've also asked about it at :User talk:Tokyogirl79/Archive 31#Víctor M. Marroquín where it was suggested by {{u|DGG}} that the article needed to be sorted out at AfD. Much of the content is being added/removed by IPs who may be trying to portray the subject in a particular light, either negatively of positively. (See :Special:diff/132.184.128.61/760280972|this, :Special:diff/132.157.128.196/761497403|this, :Special:diff/132.157.128.196/764315008|this, and :Special:diff/140.247.0.129/759788004|this Teahouse post for examples of these edits/comments). There is also this edit sum :Special:diff/132.184.131.172/767446955|here which might not technically be a |legal threat but does seem to be moving in that general direction by calling for an (legal) investigtion into the reasons a :Template:Notability was added. Anyway, none of this is, of course, a reason to delete, which is why I've continued to look for better sources. I'm just not sure now whether such sources |exist at all
— User:Marchjuly, 03:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: :WP:BIO||:WP:PROF||:WP:LEGAL||:WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Notability)