Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriela Trzebinski
I have reread the Peterson article and I think it raises an interesting question. It is obvious that as a declared collector of her works he is in a COI position. It is equally obvious that he takes a strongly positive POV. Yet his arguments are a credible interpretation of the work. If we ''consider'' that article, I would agree that the guidelines of  are fulfilled. If we ''discount'' that article, then, despite the many references that Ty has discovered, I tend with Drawn Some that the coverage is thin and does not reflect a notable appreciation of the contents and qualities of her work. Since I ''myself'' agree in part with Peterson, I could invoke the core of  - simply: "worthy of notice". But not based on a , rather based on a gut feeling (call that POV, or call it OR, or just the bias that is unavoidable in any case, simply because we care enough to edit). I'm thinking out loud here, but I don't yet see a clear (and equitable) line for this AfD
— User:Enki, 04:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)