Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazuo Hiramatsu
Strong keep''': Sourcing only to primary sources, if those sources are reliable, is not a reason to delete a page that has presumed notability under . It is also not an accurate description of this page, since both sources currently cited are secondary, and the news article looks independent. As the president of a large university, a member of national advisory councils, and the president of a major professional society, he passes NACADEMIC criterion #6 and surely passes several others. And a , including looking at the Japanese page, shows that secondary sources exist even if they aren't yet included
— User:Astrophobe, 20:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)