Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Scott Cummins
Throwing aside that {{User link|Salmodavl}} has been blocked as a sockpuppet, the links provided to the offline articles (assuming they are legit) seem to satisfy  requirement for multiple sources of significant coverage.  However, lacking any evidence that the acting roles are major to satisfy , the subject seems un-of-the-mill.  Also, the sources are from local papers from his hometown in Contra Costa and from Hawaii where he went to college.  While it shouldnt be automatically discounted because , I do wonder if based on the ROTM nature if these are Wikipedia:Independent sources that are discriminating or is this an example of a local feel-good story. This could be a case to invoke the presumed clause of GNG which says "significant coverage in reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, that a subject is suitable for inclusion. Editors may reach a consensus that although a topic meets this criterion, it is not appropriate for a stand-alone article." I will abstain from !voting unless a compelling argument sways me
— User:Bagumba, 18:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR||WP:R||WP:ITSLOCAL (Wikipedia:Notability)