Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTorrent
a  !vote. I understand this is not strictly passing , but in such cases this seems to me a ''weak'' argument to delete. We badly need distinct guidelines for free software notability. Such software can have a wide and strong community, and thus being notable in the broad meaning of the word -used and known by a non-trivial amount of people- without ever ending up in "classical" sources, simply because these are not the venues in which such softwares are usually extensively discussed. We had several examples of that. There is no reason to think the information in the article is unverifiable or unreliable, even if it relies mostly on primary sources and/or non-conventional sources.  Deletion of the article, therefore, does nothing to improve WP -quite the contrary
— User:Cyclopia, 00:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)