Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron de Wael
without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can ''actually'' find the depth and quality of sourcing that it takes. As currently written and sourced, this is much more a ''genealogy'' than an encyclopedia article — there's ''no'' evidence being shown of |reliable source coverage about him at all. Wikipedia does not have a requirement that our sources be locatable online via a Google search — print-only books and newspaper archives are acceptable — but we do have a requirement that ''reliable'' sources ''exist''. But that's not what the sources here are, and nothing stated in the article is strong or substantiated well enough to earn him a free ''presumption'' of notability in the ''absence'' of a demonstrated GNG pass either
— User:Bearcat, 15:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)