Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clogau Gold
There is nothing wrong with specialist press, and it seems to have significant coverage there (in references already listed in the article.) Unfortunately most of the article is pure advertizement and is unsourced. Per  I think the right thing to do is to simply get rid of all the unsourced material, which would reduce it to a little more than stub size. I said "weak" only because I'm not sure if it would be easier to start the article from scratch
— User:Sammy1339, 15:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)