Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy van Deurzen (2nd nomination)
Delete (weak)''' no independent source in 11 years fails . The assertion of notability as former chair of United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy is  from the UKCP. Needs checking against  /  / other, but we can't build an article (let alone a BLP) without a single secondary, independent source so this can't be left in limbo and Andy is right to nom. We wouldn't leave it in draft/AfC this long, so less acceptable in article space. The previous ''no consensus'' Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy van Deurzen has Keep arguments based on 1. publications 2. "top of her field". '''NB''' notability is not the only grounds for deletion,  promotion etc also allow deletion. No prejudice against a Keep !voter ''draftify''/''userify
— User:Widefox, 12:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NPROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)