Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Mahon
The multiple feature articles 40+ years later make me lean keep regarding GNG.  We have multiple sources with the articles, but the minimum required and the local nature of the coverage raises some  concerns.  I am not familiar with how the book being cited was published.  If its self-published, then I don't think we can count it as independent (e.g., its in the same category as a blog with no editorial review), so I am not considering the book towards meeting GNG.  If someone can explain that it holds up to review for the GNG requirements, then I would go from weak keep to keep
— User:RonSigPi, 21:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)