Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narnian timeline
The timeline as a subject does not meet the |general notability guideline and there is no indication that it can be anything other than a |plot-only description of a fictional work. Upon further examination, the references used in the article, while reliable, do not show notability for the timeline. ''Past Watchful Dragons: The Fairy Tales of C. S. Lewis'' is a |primary source since the timeline is taken allegedly from a manuscript by the author of Narnia. It is not a review or essay about the timeline and certainly not a secondary source, so it doesn't work for notability purposes. ''The C. S. Lewis Hoax'' seems to be used only to prove the authenticity of ''Outline of Narnian history'' since the document is not mentioned as part of Hooper's alleged hoaxes, which are mentioned in that book, but I couldn't find any mention about that document itself or anything related to the timeline, so it is not even a trivial mention. The ''Outline of Narnian history'' is only alluded in one sentence within ''Reading with the Heart: The Way into Narnia'', a trivial mention. The other two sources cited within the article are tertiary sources that do not show notability for the timeline in anyway as they do not make analytic or evaluative claims about the timeline. A |search engine test shows no indication of #Notability|third-party sources that cover the timeline as a subject addressed in detail. Since it is only plot and that is already covered in several other Narnia-related articles, I do not see the need to keep around this non-notable and redundant |content fork. The text of the article itself is redundant since it merely rewrites the ''Outline of Narnian History'', which is already present in image form at Wikimedia Commons. It is sufficient to add a link to that image in Narnia (world)#History
— User:Jfgslo, 02:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PLOT||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SET||WP:V||WP:CFORK (Wikipedia:Notability)