Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Motley Moose
It's hard to judge this content reasonably with edit warring and acrimony galore. Given those bloggers involved, the subject matter and the current level of heightened political interest and the rising prominence of blogs in the news media world I have to add in  in regards to finding sources. Which seems likely, again, do to the nature of the media, the players and content. What remains is neutral writing and legwork, aka clean-up. There seems to be a bias against blogs and bloggers in general and this might be a part of that. Blogs certainly can be reliable sources and more are catching on to becoming reputable sources and many morph into real world notability. This is an emerging field. Once the discussions closes I encourage those interested to dig through deleted content to see if some of the content and cites are salvageable and repurposeable
— [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- Banjeboi]], 12:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CSB (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)