Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside Bozeman
since it does have multiple coverage in other media outlets (actually somewhat unusual for a paper like this one) and so passes  (barely), and it does seem to be a legitmately significant publication in its market. I don't think "local" is a valid objection; we do (and should) have articles for local papers.  Although I do favor keeping this article, I have to note that an article about this publication was deleted in April 2010; as I (vaguely) recall, that article was written (at least initially) in a more blatantly promotional style than this one, which did not help its case any.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside Bozeman Magazine
— User:Arxiloxos, 06:10, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)