Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynette Nusbacher (2nd nomination)
I think Carrite and Yworo are correct. So is Hinata, for the most part. Because there's no indication of a noteworthy achievement or public figure status, and because there's no source providing substantial biographical detail, a BLP on this subject is going to remain worthless at best and problematic at worst. An article is devoid of encyclopedic content when it consists of |shit people think is interesting, a meaningless |list of TV appearances and publications mostly lacking note among third parties (no, just being on TV doesn't make one a public figure — that takes demonstrable coverage or prominence), and |outdated, contentious information that isn't exactly additive to any noteworthy aspect. Furthermore, I've seen nothing in the current or previous versions indicating the subject passes either  or , but even if the subject did barely pass, that's no mandate to keep, especially in light of the subject's wishes. The marginal encyclopedic merit of the article, coupled with the wishes of the subject, set beside the paucity of |in-depth coverage, should help those on the fence reach the same conclusion
— User:JFHJr, 20:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:RESUME||WP:V||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:42 (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)