Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rambam's Laws
this article, or userfy it to the author (if they request it) for possible reworking into an article about Steven Rambam. To Mpdehnel, I understand your frustration about the response you are getting to this article. But we have criteria for what can and can't be the basis for a Wikipedia article, and the main criterion is that the subject has received |significant coverage from multiple independent sources. I couldn't find such coverage for Rambam's Laws in a search of Google and Google News Archive. However, I did find quite a bit of significant coverage from reliable sources about Steven Rambam himself - for example http://blogs.computerworld.com/node/3059 http://www.csmonitor.com/Innovation/Tech-Culture/2009/0831/a-private-eye-does-an-online-search-of-us http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/263598/privacy_thing_past_says_private_investigator/ - and that coverage could be used to write an article about the person rather than about his "laws". In my opinion an article about the person would satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. (Some sources list his name as Steven Rombom with the indication that Rambam is a nickname.) If you want assistance in writing such an article, just ask at my talk page
— User:MelanieN, 15:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:42 (Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything)