Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incest pornography
there are |reliable sources out there, with substantial enough coverage to demonstrate |notability. There is a mention http://66.102.1.104/scholar?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=cache:PtHuws2MmRUJ:www.bishopireton.org/faculty/GAVINW/HomepageGavin_files/Pornography/Pornography%27s%2520effect%2520on%2520children%2520and%2520adults.doc+%22incest+porn+OR+pornography%22 here. There is a section in http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1xgnAQAACAAJ&dq=%22Men+Confront+Pornography%22&ei=YO8vSJH-EKLsygS53oXLAw this book called "Incest Pornography and the Problem of Fantasy", would be useful if anyone has access to it. It is quoted http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=dwwO1P2ftbcC&pg=PA195&dq=%22incest+porn+OR+pornography%22&ei=0-wvSIysAZHcywTrydnXAw&sig=WS6Kdus80VhFmOvVJovjsF9y_gY here. There is more coverage in http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=z6Mn0zcYfusC&pg=PA72&dq=%22incest+porn+OR+pornography%22&ei=0-wvSIysAZHcywTrydnXAw&sig=gVdr5I5iOrwj1EC_kgKXx0xFXX8 this book. Couple of news stories: http://www.courttv.com/trials/posey/012506_ctv.html, http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=15&art_id=iol1205413910264I522, http://sadlynormal.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/oh-toledo-mom-declared-fit-for-trial-on-incest-charge/. Some of these may seem somewhat trivial in their coverage, but I think that taken together, there is enough to demonstrated notability. There may be more coverage on the web, but inevitably, it is hard to search for as you have to wade through literally millions of porn sites. I think there could be a good little article there about the connection with incest, child pornography and child abuse. I would potentially support a merge, but as far as I can see, Pornography would not be a great destination because it does not seem to give much attention to any of the sub-genres beyond listing them. I think that it would also take focus away from the child porn / abuse aspect, giving |undue weight to the hot twin-on-twin action. Similarly, it could be merged to child pornography, but then it may unduly swing the focus the other way
— User:Belovedfreak, 09:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)