Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Doctor Who historical characters
Yes, you are right that MOS:FICT does allow the use of the work itself to act as a source for basic information about the work. I was using a shorthand to refer to reliable, independent, secondary sources, which is what is needed to satisfy |notability criteria. I also note that this article fails MOS:FICT in almost every other way.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Bondegezou, 18:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)