Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oskar Kuhn
although with a little hesitation. For somebody in academia who worked primarily before the internet age, I'd usually want to see more explicit evidence of specific biographical coverage, even for  cases. However, here the googlebooks resultshttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&tbs=bks%3A1&q=%22Oskar+Kuhn%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= are quite significant, even allowing for a portion of false positives. He was a co-editor of a multi-volume encyclopediahttp://books.google.com/books?id=2Cp_PQAACAAJ&dq=%22Oskar+Kuhn%22+encyclopedia&hl=en&ei=Djs7TPGnC8iOjAe54-zrAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAA. Also, his collected papers were published in 1959http://www.worldcat.org/title/collected-papers/oclc/25864864&referer=brief_results, presumably upon retirement; this usually indicates a significant degree of academic notability. The entry could certainly use the attention of an expert, but I think we can be reasonably sure that the subject was indeed a notable academic. So passes , in my opinion
— User:Nsk92, 16:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)