Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel's Vineyard
I'm seeing well over 100 news stories (I stopped counting at 100) and about 50 books discussing the subject. I think  is more than satisfied, and I don't know why the nom missed all that coverage. Also, "article is almost entirely drawn from the organization itself" is '''not''' a valid deletion reason, it's a reason to improve the article: see OTCLEANUP. And I '''really''' don't understand the suggestion "that the revert of the redirect, by the article creator, almost justifies a delete all by itself." -- Special:Contributions/202.124.75.35|202.124.75.35
— [[User talk:202.124.75.35|talk]]), 02:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Notability)