Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murad Gümen
WP:BLP and  apply here. The man is clearly a relatively unknown figure as there is no significant coverage about his work. All the sources refer to the potentially defamatory claim made by others (one includes the irrelevant tidbit about his father) and of the four, two are not |reliable sources. I opt for '''delete''' on the basis that the subject is a relatively unknown figure, |notability outside of these claims is not demonstrated, that the claims are potentially defamatory and harmful to the subject's reputation, and that he has requested deletion. The possibility of harm to a living person is the most important factor here in my view
— User:Malcolmxl5, 00:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPF||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)