Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be like Bill
Though I was originally swayed to favor Bill by the large amount of coverage available (see my entry above), I've changed my mind after looking  into Notability more thoroughly. In particular, the guidance re. Notability (events) seems apt.  Specifically,  , which states that “Notable events usually receive coverage beyond a relatively short news cycle.”  And ,  which advises “Writing about breaking news may be&nbsp;recentism, and&nbsp;Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.”  All of the articles on Be Like Bill were written in a burst of a few days starting in the last week or so.  The directives just cited, along with the rest of the discussion in (E), point towards a standard of notability that has to do with having a persistent impact.  By that standard,  one should say at a minimum that it's too soon to tell whether Bill will continue as a cultural entity.  Is there an option to "hold" the decision for a period
— User:Jmatazzoni, 18:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:BREAKING||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)