Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phyllis Bolds
egregious case of attempting to pad up a subject whom, alas!, is not notable.  The padding consists of adding entire papers written up by the subject, but which are either not cited by anyone or having less than 10 cites (lifetime grand total for the person for all papers), i.e., failing .  What does that leave?  A churnalism article written for the local newspaper by ''the public relations officer of the subject's employer'', a family interview, a series of PR/recruitment efforts including "honoring"  by the subject's employer ''whose children are current employees'' (but note: not actual medals nor any genuine, formal recognition), and a paid obituary at Thomasfunerals.com.  Clearly fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV and lack of WP:INDEPENDENT.  All special pleadings and wishes to  ought to be dismissed out of hand
— User:XavierItzm, 10:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPROF||WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS (Wikipedia:Notability)