Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rulers.org (2nd nomination)
Not |reliably sourced as notable — one of the two "references" is to itself, but you don't make a thing notable by metasourcing it to its own existence, and the other reference is to the Google Books profile of a book about the ''general'' phenomenon of name-matching databases, offering no way to |verify whether ''this'' particular database is the ''subject'' of enough content in that book to count for anything toward meeting  — and even if it is, it still takes ''more'' than just ''one'' GNG-worthy source to ''pass'' GNG. So no, this sourcing simply isn't good enough
— User:Bearcat, 18:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)