Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get back at your parents
Renaming the article to Acts of teen rebellion and experiementation (spelling error, btw - it's "experimentation" not "experiementation") doesn't change the fact that "will scare most parents", "may only work on conservative parents", "may only work on liberal parents", "Why this is important for parents" etc are all unsourced personal judgments which violate  and . If there are any specific notable examples of behavior that can be supported by reliable sources (see ) and can be presented in an encyclopedia style (rather than a "teen magazine" style), then I think they should go in the existing Teenage rebellion article (which itself needs some rework
— User:Boing, 16:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)