Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced SystemCare
I'm not going to say this is the best article ever written - but I have done quite a bit of investigation on the topic as the article creator is one of my mentees. Quite simply, I think there is clearly enough to meet our |notability guidelines. I think Ihcoyc has it backwards - notability is not something that can be lost but we don't have to prove that something will be used and popular in coming years. Indeed if it's notable now, in 10 years it will still be notable as something that was notable 10 years ago (if that makes sense). A program that is the most popular of it's kind (as mentioned above), reviewed multiple times in reliable sources is notable. I should also point out that  is firstly an essay (as opposed to  and ) and secondly just because something is commonplace doesn't mean it CANNOT be notable - which this product clearly is
— User:Worm, 09:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:NOT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)