Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantitative parasitology
Sections two and three aredirectly copied from http://www.zoologia.hu/qp/BRIEFGUIDE3.pdf this for the most part. I'm not sure how that works with  since I'm not seeing a copyright outright though. I'd have a tendency to suggest  with that in mind. I have to agree with Agricolae otherwise though in that I'm not really entirely sure what to do with it. It's a common cross categorization ( comes to mind), but it doesn't really seem distinct either from quantitative research, just that it's for parasites. Things truly specific to parasites would seem like too technical of formulae used for models, sampling methods, etc. for an encyclopedia. Someone might be able to write up population dynamics of parasites article someday that would have significant overlap and would be notable, but this is a rare case where I'd say TNT the thing and let someone take up the population dynamics stuff in a new article. Either way, we don't seem to be losing anything by delete right now
— User:Kingofaces43, 06:38, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COPYVIO||WP:TNT||WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:Copyright violations)