Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Act
This is just additional harassment from Rich, Rubin and SPECIFICO... Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive786#User:Xerographica.  The information is factual and is obviously notable to the congresspeople who sponsored and co-sponsored it.  Right now the argument is that newspaper editors are somehow more qualified than congresspeople when it comes to determining notability.  Regarding the slippery slope argument... I think it's pretty absurd to worry about editors making the effort to create an entry for every 10,000 bills introduced.  And if they did...so what?  Why not have a record of all the laws that congresspeople have tried to pass?  How is that unencyclopedic?  Is the concern that 10,000 entries is going to take up a lot of space on the hard drive?  If so, anybody with even the slightest knowledge of space constraints would appreciate how absurd such a concern is.  |Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia
— User:Xerographica, 14:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTPAPER (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)