Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars sequel trilogy
verifiable, sourced to reliable sources, no more a synthesis than any other article and hardly breaching , since this article is about what has been said, not what will be said.  Yes, there's an argument that this shouldn't be important, but that's another argument that smacks of POV. I can't see this as being guilty of UNDUE, since this has been reported upon by the BBC
— User:Hiding, 13:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)