Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Raj
With an article about such an important topic, the only reason to delete would be the nonexistence of a suitable version '''anywhere''' in the history.  Is the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=156224 original version better than nothing?  I believe so, and thus without any opinion of the current state of the article, I oppose deletion.  By the way, you use "|NPOV" in a pejorative manner — are you sure that you mean "neutral point of view"?  Finally, I see comments at talk such as one opposing the idea of continuing to ; even if the Raj were a fiction or a hoax, it's gotten enough coverage that we could write an article about the impact of this legal fiction
— User:Nyttend, 01:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)