Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order of the Eagle of Georgia and the Seamless Tunic of Our Lord Jesus Christ
Without any intention of sounding peevish, "proclaiming" an order reestablished, then "Knighting" yourself within it are, indeed, serious conflicts of interest -  (admittedly not the world's strongest rationale).  The defunct house from the 13th century may have had significance in that era, but that infamy remains with the defunct house and is not inherited by incarnation of the "new" entity.  Having members who claim prominence of various other active/inactive "houses" does not change the status of the defunct entity.  Would consider this  until it's currency and notability as vested can be distinctly providen.  Basically what I'm saying is they may be trying to reestablish the name, but the history does not transfer to contemporary times just because someone wanted to recreate it today.  It would be no more valid than calling yourself a "Knight's Templar", finding people who can attest that there were some long ago, buying a plot of land by the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, and then self-Knighting/anointing to currency
— User:Ren99, 09:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:NN (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)