Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Mondryk
The issue isn't whether he has any talent nor whether people feel his media attention is deserved. The only question is whether he receives significant coverage from reliable third party sources. otability  Hello: http://www.thisislancashire.co.uk/news/1719385.singing_brothers_notch_up_another_success/http://menmedia.co.uk/tv_and_showbiz/s/1003052_brothers_have_got_tv_talenthttp://menmedia.co.uk/prestwichadvertiser/news/s/1064549_harry_is_top_of_the_pops_this_timehttp://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/britain_got_talent/2956168/Warbling-Britains-Got-Talent-teen-in-fourth-audition.htmlhttp://www.prestwichandwhitefieldguide.co.uk/news/8220946.Brothers_set_for_Talent_tour/http://menmedia.co.uk/news/s/532143_young_harry_shows_that_hes_still_got_talenthttp://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2010/05/01/it-s-si-time-i-won-115875-22225186/http://www.burytimes.co.uk/news/8208638.Britain_s_Got_talent_brothers_return_home/  Under the guidelines subjects who receive significant press coverage are notable even when they receive the coverage as a result of failure, losing elections or declaring bankruptcy. Notability attaches solely as a result of the coverage
— User:Eudemis, 14:00, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)