Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 in UFC events (2nd nomination)
edit conflict with Ravenswing's sensible comment'') The content is encyclopedic and mostly referenced. There has been a lot of dispute here as to whether individual UFC events deserve articles, but this combined article is a good compromise. The reason for deletion doesn't make sense per Wikipedia policy. Summary articles are allowed even if the events have their own pages. Finally, it was AfDed previously less than a month ago, with the result "speedy keep", so nominating it again so quickly is an abuse of Wikipedia's process, possibly a case of  or , almost certainly more to do with the debate over coverage of UFC than any concern about notability or article quality
— User:Colapeninsula, 12:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:REICHSTAG (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)