Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wanker (2nd nomination)
Certainly not a neologism, but fails . ( was the main argument for deletion in the first afd). The article content is in very bad shape and is not encyclopedic in its current form. Recommend soft redirect to Wikitionary. At minimum, please let's remove the "popular references"/trivia sections altogether which as is so often the case, are out of control and a net negative - and well, a crap magnet in themselves in this such a case. I absolutely agree that the consensus reached in the previous afd was inadequate - in terms of taking the discussion seriously in policy terms
— User:Bwithh, 03:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF||WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)