Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters who can alter probability
I really hate all of these types of articles, which do everything except explain why a character is on the list.  I suppose that I could click on the blue link to see what's so special about "Amos Fortune", but the only reason I would want to look at a list is to be able to see similarities and differences.  It's original synthesis, badly done, with the authors filtering out anything that might be remotely of interest to anyone who might consult it, so I can see other things I can say beyond .  I'd compare it to creating a list of the fifty American states and the only information about the state would be what time zones it's in, whether it's east or west, whether its flat or mountainous, and whether it's small, medium or large.  Yawn.  Clearly, people have worked hard on it and might even try to improve it, but for the most part, these are all boring and useless
— User:Mandsford, 21:16, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)