Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science and God
Thanks for your comments, however I would like to point out a few more details. Intelligent design(ID) and several other related articles are already classified as List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience#Religious_and_spiritual_beliefs|pseudoscience actually there is no debate here. we tend to avoid creationism too, we all agree that the earth was not created a few thousand years ago and we do not believe that there is scientific evidence for Noah’s flood. If you have a look at the Creation-evolution controversy article you will notice them. Therefore,  (content forking) doesn’t apply here.The name of the article implies that the article is not about a particular religion therefore it doesn’t promote a particular religion, however I agree with you on the neutrality of point of view (POV). But we want to make sure that we don’t delete articles simply because we have a different POV. As an example, we didn’t delete the article Existence of God we put a subsection of Existence_of_God#Arguments_against_the_existence_of_God|evidence against in the article instead. If an editor thinks that a passage from an article is provocative or simply wrong he or she can edit the page. There is also a talk page for every article in Wikipedia. Some comments may be from pro-ID guys, Michael Behe I think is pro-ID but maybe we can still have his comments here because he is a scientist. I am afraid but I don’t see any rational for deleting the article, I think it can be improved with editing and probably a talk page
— User:Kiatdd, 16:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CFORK (Wikipedia:Content forking)