Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (art)
By way of preface, my personal opinion is that identity politics has been the centre of the moral universe in the humanities department for the past forty-odd years or so, and the result has been an indigestible mass of turgid prose from armchair revolutionaries trying to out-transgress one another, serene in their conviction that their incomprehensible screeds are striking mighty blows against the hegemonic patriarchy that ignores them.  The editor who's able to wade through that stuff and provide a readable synopsis in |plain English would be doing a favor to not only the encyclopedia but to the human race.'''But''', the current article reads like a quote-farm from these texts.  This raises not only |unencyclopedic issues but also |originality issues.  I think a successful article will have to at minimum provide an original synopsis of all of these points of view, and not let the sources speak for themselves.  They '''can't''' speak for themselves; they just aren't able any more
— User:Ihcoyc, 17:18, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UPE||WP:NOT||WP:COPYVIO (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)