Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precolombian goldworking of the Chibchan Area
Being a poorly written article is not a criterion for deletion.  The article is already tagged for clean up and that is all it needs.  It cites a source, so it cannot be  unless the source does not exist or the content does not reflect what the source says.  No one has alleged that.  Many WP articles are summaries of published work -  but a legitimate one in an encyclopaedia (not illicit plagiarism or COPY-VIO).  Unless some one can produce a valid reason for deletion, this article should be kept.  I know nothing of the subject myself, but it looks credible to me
— User:Peterkingiron, 23:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)