Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFOs and the Bible
The idea is a load of cobblers - but there is a hell of a lot in print about it. People like von Daniken are not so much discredited by the scientific establishment as never having been credited in the first place - but they and their theories are notable (unfortunately...). Apart from that external link (which I regard as spam), the article looks well researched and documented. I can't see much that violates . The whole concept is 'fringe' , but it's much-publicised fringe - unlike some of the snake-oil peddlers and self-improvenent jockeys we get trying to push their own particular brands. To me, this attempts to cover the lot of this particular bee in the bonnet
— User:Peridon, 20:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)