Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PaGaLGuY (2nd nomination)
The nomination was made on the basis of there being no reliable sources - that's no longer true.  We now have coverage from The Times of India and the Economic Times, and just enough to meet . Does the nominator want to withdraw the nomination, or do any of the others who voted delete based on the original poor sourcing want to change their votes
— User:timtempleton, 00:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)