Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan RoAne
Definitely . Going down the sources in order, the SF State University one is an ad listing for a course she's giving; the Fripp one is an article self-published by someone who calls herself RoAne's "marketing buddy". The Huffington Post one is actually a video produced by RoAne's publisher. The UT School Of Law one is an ad for an event. The NYU one is promo for an event. The Harper Collins one is from her publisher. The Publisher's Weekly one appears to be legitimately third-party... but it doesn't support the claim that it is being referenced against ("which was number one on Book of the Month Club’s Best Seller list and the Publisher's Weekly Best Seller list."); that information is not in the source. Then we're at the subject's own website. Then we have another third party site, but she's just one on a list of more than 80 speakers that at least some unnamed meeting planner praised. The next three to various publications are indeed third party sources, and do indeed verify that she has written for them, but articles by her (as opposed to articles about her) do not convey notability. Next is the Wall Street Journal, which does have a brief quote, but only half a sentence about her, not a conveyor of notability. The claim that she has been heard on NPR points to what appears to be merely local shows on two NPR affiliates, not on something syndicated across the nation. So if we strip away the puffery and the things not appropriately sourced, there's not much left here
— User:NatGertler, 02:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)