Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security thought leadership
I agree with Doc Strange on this one. I looked up the topic, and tried to find reliable sources. I was only able to find two,http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS115601+04-Apr-2008+BW20080404http://www.sans.edu/resources/securitylab/pari_networks_kumar.php and both were highly unhelpful. Therefore I conclude a lot of the article is made up of |original research. The tone of this essay clearly isn't encyclopedic, and I believe it is safe to say this was meant to be a personal essay. #WEBSPACE| states wikipedia is not for personal essays. I would like to mention a third policy that it violates, which Doc didn't mention. That is 
— User:SJP, 22:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NOT||WP:V (Wikipedia:No original research)