Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Conrad (3rd nomination)
The reason stated here is the same as for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Conrad|the last one, in saying the nominator works for MTV, speaks for Ms. Conrad, and wishes the article deleted due to Conrad's wishes. The subject is notable, but that is not what the nomination is about. As before, the nominator has no proof that they actually speak on behalf of Ms. Conrad, and even if they did, there is no grounds for deletion. Also as before, this deletion makes for the nominator's first and only edits to WP and seems to be a clear violation of 
— User:Skew, 22:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)