Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy E. Punke
Nothing here is so "inherently" notable as to exempt him from actually having to pass , but none of the sources are getting him past GNG — it's referenced to a mix of |primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things or people, not to coverage that's substantively ''about him''. Wikipedia is not a place where professional anythings are entitled to repost their résumés just because they exist: the basis for inclusion in Wikipedia is not the things the article ''says'', but the quality of the ''referencing'' that the article uses to ''support'' what it says, and none of the references here are cutting it
— User:Bearcat, 17:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Notability)