Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Smith (British Army officer)
WP:SOLDIER says (as it has to): "In general, an individual is presumed to be notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources."  Only considering the books in libraries of people active in Milhist, we probably have hundreds of books that devote significant, independent coverage to all the key Normandy officers.  There's a misreading of  here; we're not going to get rid of our article on Nathan Hale, who was only notable for one event.  The point of  is that multiple newspapers, all breathlessly dishing out the same drivel, don't make someone notable; but if the interest of multiple independent historians doesn't make someone notable, then "notability" doesn't mean anything. - Dank
— [[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]), 17:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT||WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)