Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfterLogic XMail Server
I get 13.700 Ghits for "AfterLogic XMail Server".  Overwhelming majority are independent, and I see no reason to assume that the info on the page should not be factually correct, it is certainly verifiable by tech buffs.  With the many hits, I assume that the product has such a penetration in the Linux (or whatever) community that a Wikipedia article is warrented.  I see no promotion, advertising or spam.  Maybe it's a , maybe the creator has  - and that should definitely have been disclosed by the editor - but I cannot see that this has influenced, skewed or tainted the article, factual as it is.  I cannot see that own interest have been advanced at the detriment of the interests of Wikipedia.  I'm likely a minority around here, but tag with refimprove and '''keep
— User:Power, 12:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPA||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)