Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiohalo
unless before the end of this AfD someone does a major revision of the article. Ordinarily, I would say that notability is a primary concern but in this case  is a bigger problem. From looking at the article, it is really hard to figure out the context or what is really going on here. Loads of 'citations needed' tags and unverified data in the article and only a couple of direct citations. Six years on WP is more than enough time for this article to have been brought to  standards. The article can't really stand as it is. If someone knowledgeable about the subject can produce a reasonable stub while this AfD is open, it could be kept. Otherwise, better to delete the whole thing
— User:Nsk92, 04:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)