Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Kong defence
This is an example of a non-noteable comment in a trial being made notable by the same people who are creating this article.  Some of the earliest news stories covering the "King Kong defense" are actually referencing back to this article.  Which means the article is essentially feeding itself.  Sure, the "King Kong defense" may '''become''' notable if future cases make use of it.  But who are we to look into our |crystal balls and decide that we should have the article ready "just in case" that happens?  Make reference of the defense's statements in the trial article.  If it starts to grow '''ON ITS OWN MERITS''' then we can split it into it's own article
— User:TRTX, 21:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)