Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race and intelligence (4th nomination)
I encourage those !voting to keep to review this article's sources, specifically their age. The article cites many studies which are out-of-date, and fail  AGE. We are using old sources to misrepresent the modern academic consensus, which is not appropriate for many reasons. This article fails to summarize modern secondary source, instead citing obscure primary sources without appropriate distance. This information is historically important, and with context might be useful at History of the race and intelligence controversy. This article, however, purports to explain the topic at large, including the modern consensus. Hopefully everyone here is aware that genetics has advanced considerably in recent decades, regardless of how these older works were seen at the time. If your argument is that the article should be kept because the topic is covered by sources, then the article is '''not''' representing these sources in an encyclopedic fashion. Other articles already do a better job of summarizing sources, so this one has been made superfluous, at best
— User:Grayfell, 00:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)