Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhiannon Waits
unless the author can find a |reputable source to support notability.  I couldn't find any substance in related web pages, and IMHO other Wikipedia editors shouldn't have to do all the work in removing puff and bias (one problem being that the existence of psychic phenomena is of course |POV and so notability cannot be based on that alone).  I would have said keep as a single-para article if it weren't irredeemably promotional (and apparently written by the subject's office staff  http://www.psychic-rhiannon.com/arhiannonwaitscompany.html).  Keeping this would set a bad precedent
— User:Cedders, 16:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:POV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)