Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John B. Kimble
The NYT coverage appears to be about the (admittedly amusing) fact that Kimble's campaign manager in 2000 was the wife of an opponent. This is the stuff of |one-off trivia. I'd be willing to consider his notability on a separate basis if this article covered his "work as a scientist researching hormonal rage syndrome," but I see no notable coverage of his work in this capacity, and I can't help but look askance at "keep" votes that have as their basis arguments like "he's not notable in the context of the current article, he's notable in this completely, totally unrelated context." (no offense intended there) Let's be frank: if this guy's campaign manager in one failed election campaign in 2000 hadn't been his opponent's wife, we probably wouldn't be having this conversation, because that simple bit of trivia is what generated the NYT coverage, and the NYT coverage is all that makes this interesting. Beyond that, all coverage appears very local. Delete
— User:Ginsengbomb, 09:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)