Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Protocol (video game)
The articles at GameSpy and Ten Ton Hammer seem to me to just squeak in under the |notability bar.  I reread the user's talk page comments, and I'm not convinced that they clearly say that these articles were published because of advertising money- nor am I convinced that this would render the sources no longer usable for demonstrating notability.  There ''is'' a serious |conflict of interest problem, but the correct response to that would be a neutral rewrite, and for the people who work for Dark Sky to stop editing the article.  There ''is'' one of those editors who has behaved badly and been blocked, but that's outside the scope of this discussion.  I don't think this game is ''very'' notable, but I'm not feeling that I can make a clear call for deletion, either.  Other wise editors better-schooled in the ways of such games may disagree with me, and could even persuade me to change my mind
— User:FisherQueen, 22:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)