Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LEAD Technologies (2nd nomination)
None of the reasons including the sources provided by {{u|Trusty route}} above have anything to do with the actual criteria used to establish notability. The guideline is .  requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. Also, saying that the organization is notable because it had a demonstrative effect on scientific communities is |synthesis, none of those scholarly articles says that
— User:HighKing, 19:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:SYN (Wikipedia:Notability)