Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullshido.net (4th nomination)
fails to muster up the ''substantial'' coverage in |reliable sources that is required. The long history of COI edits, canvassing, s.p.a. involvement, etc., is sad but irrelevant to the simple continuing failure of this article to meet our standards. Arguments for retention boil down to  and exaggeration of the importance of the few mentions that have been found. As for examiner.com content: the less said, the better
— User:Orangemike, 17:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:RS||:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)