Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanlie James
from the nominator.  I appreciate that the article has been improved since I nominated it.  But it remains a straightforward listing of CV-type data, solely drawing on the works of the subject herself.  The subject fails all four criteria of :  no evidence of being "widely cited by peers," no evidence of "originating a significant new concept," no "well-known work or collective body of work," and has "not won significant critical attention."  Just listing the subject's books and saying they sit on library shelves doesn't do it.  I don't think I have to remind people that we need people ''other than the subject herself'' commenting on these things -- none of that is in the article.  I greatly respect the article's creator
— User:SlimVirgin, 20:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)