Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madis Eek
The ''Äripäev'' https://static-pdf.aripaev.ee/XjH653_dwk-5kyJoXM5aFjomTzU.pdf article is absolutely not "nearly entirely an interview piece" whatsoever. It is a lengthy, featured profile of the subject, directly. He is quoted in the article. It is not merely some "interview" piece. https://www.aurumworld.net/about-the-building This is an interview piece. https://static-pdf.aripaev.ee/XjH653_dwk-5kyJoXM5aFjomTzU.pdf This is not.  You also still seem to not understand : "Inherited notability is the idea that something qualifies for an article merely because it was associated with some other, legitimately notable subjects." A co-creator, equally in partnership with another person, is not "inheriting" the notabilty of their associate when the weight of an article is given to both equally (or, minimally, as you suggest). I also never claimed that the subject was "notable by the mere merit of having co-created a building." It is the totality of his work
— User:ExRat, 20:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)