Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abeokuta Girls Grammar School
Increasingly disappointed with this group of editors attending every school AfD, repeating the same "because it is so" arguments, dismissing established, broad consensus (, SNGs) and wikilawyering the recent RfC (hashtag #alternative fact|alternativeRfCs). And then another group, of which I seem to be part, engaging them in multiple venues, repeating the same "but... policies and guidelines? RfC? WP:LOCALCON? seriously?" pleas ad nauseum... If it's not given a free pass in one of our SNGs, and it doesn't pass GNG, it's not notable. I appreciate that notability, being based on existing publishing models, is one of the sources of systemic bias -- but the answer to notability's systemic bias isn't to just throw it out the window for some subjects but not others (unless, I suppose, there is broad consensus to do so in a way that reconciles it with core policies). I do wish this could be resolved in meta discussions rather than regarding several individual examples on top of meta discussions. Typically for this sort of thing, we'd hold an RfC to sort out differences and find consensus, but that just happened. If people simply refuse to acknowledge it, and the problem is widespread enough, is it possible the issue is enough in the space of behavior (as opposed to content) that it's something for ArbCom to weigh in on? &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 04:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)