Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darryl Parker
nn.  Note to creator of article:  It's not the length per se that's the problem.  It's the length of non-notable stuff, that's the problem.  You have to read  and see what wikipedia thinks is notable, and worthy of inclusion.  Then, the article must show this, and provide verifiable proof (like footnotes) of it.  I read the old version and new, and I don't see anything meeting the requirements.  As an example, if Parker is the "author of several important historical papers", then the question is what papers, why are they important, where were they published, who published them, how widely were they read, etc
— User:Thivierr, 11:22, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)