Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Sherwin
highly notable in his field, a cited published academic who has made significant contributions to his field of study, particularly in the husbandry and welfare of laboratory animals.  clearly states: {{xt|Some academics may not meet any of these criteria, but may still be notable for their academic work. It is important to note that it is very difficult to make clear requirements in terms of numbers of publications or their quality: the criteria, in practice, vary greatly by field. Also, this proposal sets the bar fairly low, which is natural: to a degree, academics live in the public arena, trying to influence others with their ideas. It is natural that successful ones should be considered notable.}} There is little doubt that his work meets the notability criteria in his academic field, (entomology-zoology-Biology|veterinary biology), having served as a member of the working group that drafted the scientific risk assessment which was reviewed by the Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) panel and adopted as their scientific opinion on the “Aspects of the biology and welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes” published in the 2005 EFSA Journal. He also authored Chapter 25, The Husbandry and Welfare of Non-Traditional Laboratory Rodents in "The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research Animals" (8th edition
— User:Atsme, 20:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)