Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockin' Heaven
It is precisely series like this that I think that  should have a criterion along the lines of "has been translated, or licensed for translation, into ''N'' languages". As an IP above put it, "wouldn't basic logic an common sense dictate that nobody would waste time and money licensing, translating, and publishing a "non-notable" work, let alone, MULTIPLE companies in multiple languages?" This is along the lines of the  criterion of winning an award or the  criterion of having a song chart or the  criterion of having held a sufficiently high office: it's not these event per se that make the subject notable, but that these are markers that can make us pretty confident that more material is out there, even if we don't have it in hand at the moment. Which goes in hand with the official policy that |we don't have to have everything in hand yet. That we do not (yet) have such a requirement means that I'm likely to be discounted by the closing admin as not supported by guidelines, but so be it. Lasting as long as it has in Japan and several other publishers putting their money where their mouth is sufficiently indicates a level of notability that I'm confident that eventually this series can be shown to meet  #1
— User:Quasirandom, 01:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BK||WP:BK||WP:MUSIC||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:EP||WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)