Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie V. Woodcock
unless stubbed into an actual biography and rewritten from scratch).  While it looks like Woodcock himself could probably clear some threshold of notability (as the term is used on Wikipedia), the present Wikipedia article completely fails to demonstrate that. Fundamentally, the problem is that the article is mistitled.  The article currently located at Leslie V. Woodcock isn't actually Woodcock's biography, but rather is An exhaustive and overly-detailed analysis of some comments that Woodcock made to a regional newspaper in April 2015.  The vast bulk of the article &ndash; including most of the brief lead, the two largest of the article's three body sections, and all of the ''See also''s &ndash; deal with climate change, his views thereon, and the (mostly-blogosphere-driven) reaction to them.  Meanwhile, his entire ''Early life and career'' &ndash; from getting his PhD in 1970 through to the present &ndash; gets two sentences and no actual description of his scientific work.  The article is a , not a biography, and flagrantly violates 
— User:TenOfAllTrades, 12:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK||WP:WEIGHT (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)