Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rozen Maiden characters (2nd nomination)
DragonZero is correct when they say that eyes outside WP:A&M are needed. Offshoot articles might be a precedent, but like here they quickly devolve into dumping grounds for |original research. One thing that used to happen in the past was that we had |"''X'' in popular culture" articles because the authors of the main articles would rather not deal with such content. However, that is what is needed and here DragonZero has merged any usable information on the ''main characters'' into the parent article. While main characters of series are often notable, side characters usually lack any coverage to write about them without devoting to original research or synthesis. This is the case here. Lastly we should remember why articles are split off in the first place: because of size; the content of this article would have been deleted in the main article because it is OR, or else the article would have never gotten to GA
— User:Opencooper, 00:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:IPCA (Wikipedia:No original research)