Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huang's law
Yet another |neologism written about far |too soon. One reference is a not-in-depth |primary source which throws in "Huang's law" for the sake of a clickbait headline (and Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#RfC:_Reliability_of_headlines|headlines are not to be trusted), following it up with an admission that nobody actually called the idea "Huang's law" yet. The other two sources are |newsblogs from this past week. Nothing here establishes notability. The best source that further searching could find is another opinion column https://www.extremetech.com/computing/315277-theres-no-such-thing-as-huangs-law?source=opera saying the idea doesn't make sense. Wikipedia is not for Mean Girls|trying to make ''fetch'' happen
— User:XOR, 22:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:TOOSOON||WP:PRIMARY||WP:NEWSBLOG (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)