Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia
as per the nom. The only reason why articles like this can be written is because it somehow involves those writing the very articles themselves. While the article tries to keep to  (not much in terms of "rules" but trying to write about Wikipedia in the third person, obviously) its obvious that a similar ban of another website wouldn't be written about---so the fact that WP is involved is the reason why the article exists. So, the article is the product of the ''enthusiasm of WP editors'' and not of ''notability.'' Of course, the two can overlap, but not in this case
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WAWI (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)