Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klay Buckingham
The thing is, there are multiple, multiple issues with this article. First off is that the article is written to promote Buckingham and is full of unsourced information. Even if you are Buckingham himself (which I'm inclined to believe), we need coverage in sources that are independent of yourself. By this I mean sources in things such as news reports and the like. () Social media sites are not usable as reliable sources, especially those that are edited by a primary source. At the most they can be used as a  or  source, but that's pushing it and they will never show notability. You do seem to exist, but existing is not notability. () As it stands, this could probably be speedied as promotion/spam. I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but it really does come across as you coming on here to promote yourself, which is never well received
— User:Tokyogirl79, 05:57, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARY||WP:TRIVIAL||WP:ITEXISTS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)