Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bieber on Twitter
As I understand fancruft being something other than , the article would be of extremely limited interest over a relatively obscure topic where there was limited sourcing.  http://twitter.com/fusetv/status/215126996513071104 FuseTV mentioned the article on Twitter.  The sources include ones in several languages including Romanian, Turkish and Italian.  They also represent sources from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and India.  Justin Bieber has 25 million followers, more than the population of Australia.  There are over 100 different sources including academic works, newspapers, popular culture works.  I'm trying to understand what you are defining as fancruft here.  Can you provide additional details?  And if the article has that many reliable sources that would in most cases far exceed those required for notability elsewhere, then what is going on?  The article goes beyond what Bieber's random blatherings on Twitter are.  Please elaborate more?  If necessary, I can work to improve the article to add any of the 3,000+ available  sources that do more than just mention random tweets Bieber made
— User:LauraHale, 11:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)