Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tabiti
easily passes  per https://books.google.com/books?id=3XlkAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA127&dq=tabiti&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiz1IiZxfPeAhUMqI8KHWx_CTwQ6AEIMDAC#v=onepage&q=tabiti&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=ARyeneZne9gC&pg=PA71&dq=tabiti+Scythians&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjLnZbDxvPeAhUDr48KHeQcAGwQ6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=tabiti%20Scythians&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=jixfDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA47&dq=tabiti&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiz1IiZxfPeAhUMqI8KHWx_CTwQ6AEIUDAI#v=onepage&q=tabiti&f=false. I am rather inclined to suggest '''procedural close''' because no policy based reasoning has been provided and there was clear failure of . The months later block of {{U|Falconfly}} is irrelevant because he was an independent editor. I am not going to count the false accuations of sock puppetry made by the nominator because
— User:Tabiti, 03:00, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)