Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Scarlat
This person is not notable under conventional thresholds of . As the subject is an engineer, WoS probably gives a better assessment of his research work. A targeted query ("AUTHOR: (scarlat a*) Refined by: RESEARCH AREAS: (CONSTRUCTION BUILDING TECHNOLOGY OR ENGINEERING) Timespan: All years. Search language=Auto") shows 8 papers with citation counts: 3, 1, 1, 0, 0, ... As for books, WorldCat shows his "Approximate methods in structural seismic design" is held by ~150 institutions and that he has several other books in the Romanian language, whose holdings are in the single digits. Finally, we do not conventionally accept "trivial mentions" and such, even in mainstream periodicals, as demonstration of notability. Unless there's something else we're missing, this analysis seems fairly conclusive
— User:Agricola44, 16:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)