Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Günter Bechly
While some of his work is impressive to me, does not appear to meet  or .  The current article also has apparent  issues.  If kept, it should be pruned (as ).  I tried to find some mentions in large English papers and found one mention in The Washington Post as the author of an image used in a paleontology related news article (which was not about him and is not significant coverage).  The current sources used in the article are far from ideal (fail to demonstrate significant coverage in sources independent of the subject and notability).  It is possible that the person is better known locally/nationally than internationally
— User:PaleoNeonate, 08:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPROF||WP:NBIO||WP:COI||WP:NOTCV (Wikipedia:Notability)