Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hereditary Peerage Association
This article seems to scrape through all the tests. First, it clearly meets #Non-commercial_organizations; this is the association of a group of people who elect a sizeable proportion of members of the House of Lords.  It is irrelevant whether any editor thinks that arrangement a good or bad thing, but that's how it is, and this body has a position not unlike a sort of unofficial grouping of the majority of members of a United Kingdom constituencies|parliamentary constituency. As such, it is clearly a group of national scale, albeit not a high-profile one.Secondly, there is no dispute that this group exists: we have one good secondary source, and several undisputed primary sources. notes that "smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations." If this was a paper encyclopedia, I doubt that this article would merit as many as five lines, but |Wikipedia is ''not'' a paper encyclopedia. This is a weak article, but it's not a bad or misleading one, and it's a pity that it seems to have gotten caught up in a political dispute between some editors
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 21:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:PAPER (Wikipedia:Notability)