Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Topshelf Records
Coverage" is not, on its own, enough to meet the criteria for notability. The coverage must also be significant and independent. None of those references meets the criteria for establishing notability. https://pitchfork.com/thepitch/86-your-new-favorite-emo-bands-the-best-of-topshelf-records-2013-sampler/ The Pitchfork reference is a mere mention-in-passing, essentially saying they've had a breakthrough year but providing no other information on the company itself but comments on the success of various artists and albums, fails  and . https://arena.com/article/topshelf-interview The Arena reference is entirely based on an interview with the company and it therefore not independent coverage and fails . The http://www.punktastic.com/interviews/interview-seth-decoteau-topshelf-records-september-2015/ Punktastic reference is also entirely based on an interview, likewise fails . Finally http://sdcitybeat.com/music/notes-from-the-smoking-patio/topshelf-records-moves-san-diego/ the San Diego CityBeat reference is based on an announcement and also fails 
— User:HighKing, 16:40, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)