Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatisation
I don't see the connection #BATTLEGROUND has with this case. As explained above, the issue is two fold - 1. use of a politically charged term for the title - I would argue that any ~isation article should be deleted or merged into corresponding demographic section for given country subject; 2. the creation of a separate stubb (instead of covering in relevant existing stubbs), the choice of title and examples, leads me to believe that purpose of the stubb is to push a particular propaganda line - for this reason I see it as .  I'ld appreciate it if you could explain why you don't see it as , and if my reasoning is flawed, point out where it is so.  Also, what is the relevance of the Anti-Croatian_sentiment stubb.  If it contravenes wiki rules then it should be subject to the same criteria and resolution process
— User:Marinko, 14:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:POINT||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)