Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stdlib.h
to C standard library#ISO_C_library_headers. The text in this article is high quality, different from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limits.h, which was not. That makes it more important to preserve the content somewhere, but the same argument applies. I'll rehash what I said there. #1 in  applies. While the specific phrases "how-to" and "owner's manual" don't adequately describe Stdlib.h, it belongs in a reference manual, not in an encyclopedia.  #8 in  also applies: "Wikipedia articles are not a complete exposition of all possible details. Rather, an article is a '''summary''' of accepted '''knowledge''' regarding its subject." Emphasis mine of course: knowledge includes facts but it's not just a litany of all available facts
— User:Pnm, 15:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:NOTDIRECTORY (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)