Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Hamill
I generally prefer !voting in Afds where I am not involved as an article contributor (purely my personal choice, as I feel I may not be able to comment neutrally in deletion discussions of any article where I have edited significantly). Therefore, if Tigraan is okay with it, I'll simply place my general views, clarifying that they should be read as neither a support or oppose. On the positive side for this author are the two extensive and very in-depth coverages of her career done by https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-426324351.html The Sunday Mail and http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/music/morrisseys-no1-fan-reveals-how-6303831#x0X46uxHwyTLZASG.97 Daily Record. These two should be enough to qualify her on BASIC. Beyond this,  mentions that an individual may be notable if ''"the person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."'' Hamill has created a very well-known and well-covered book, and this alone again seems enough to qualify her as being notable. On the negative side, a few other coverage that I have found of her seem to be purely press releases (but then, I think that is expected during the book promotion stage). Notwithstanding my comments, I'll maintain my ambivalence to this article being kept or deleted
— [[User talk:Xender Lourdes|Lourdes]], 15:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)