Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rape jihad (2nd nomination)
Having read this afd i would like to express my admiration for the cogent arguments that the participants have put forward although the passion being displayed at times may have put off some editors from taking part.  That said, the article appears to meet , however some parts are  (eg. 7 refs, and some repeated, for a 2 line sentence about the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal|Rotherham incident)  These refs in the article all (but 1:)) have ''Rape Jihad'' in their title and look notable - http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3846/britain-child-grooming, http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=11278, http://www.afternoonvoice.com/after-love-jihad-now-rape-jihad.html, http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/rape-jihad-inside-isis-harem-for-captured-non-muslim-women/, http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/391814/isis-and-rape-jihad-andrew-c-mccarthy, http://www.jewishvoiceny.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8449:rape-jihad-inside-isis-harem-for-captured-non-muslim-women&catid=125:iranian-threat&Itemid=331, http://www.udayindia.in/english/content_27sept2014/cover-story.html (the last one although titled ''Mystery of Love Jihad'' has large part discussing Rape Jihad).  Could one or more of the deletionists please explain why they are not suitable (but not a generalisation like "they're all not notable":).  thanks
— User:Coolabahapple, 14:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:OVERCITE (Wikipedia:Notability)