Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaymer
A couple things that I would like to point out. On  one of the criteria for inclusion is that ''"we must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and papers '''about''' the term"'' (emphasis mine) One of the sources in the article is the university study ''about'' Gaymers--as an entity, as a group of which this terms apply. This brings the focus beyond the gay community as an extension of how the world at large relates to this sub-culture of ''Gaymers''. Second, the systematic bias comes into play in that the term is being viewed through limited worldview that systematically excludes those things which are notable and relevant beyond those looking glasses. The Gay Community is a sizable minority and Gaymers are a notable subculture that is within that minority. It's Wikipedia's desire (As laid out in ) to ''"to fill in the gaps left by this bias, consciously focusing on those subjects and perspectives neglected by the encyclopedia as a whole."''. Does the article need to be expanded? I concur and will note that Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies|Wikiproject LGBT has this on their list of articles to work on and expand. Actions like this help to counter that systematic bias instead of creating more gaps and, as a whole, Wikipedia benefits
— User:Agne27, 08:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)