Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threadless
While I would certainly agree that the article needs better citations than the ones it currently has, and therefore may currently fall afoul of , I strongly disagree that the article fails  because it's a notable company that has been the subject of non-trivial coverage in secondary sources multiple times, which is the primary criterion listed on 
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:CORP||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)