Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/300-page iPhone bill (second nomination)
the nomination is based on a #CRYSTAL ball vision of future notability cloaked as a novel interpretation of encyclopedic suitability.  only considers objective evidence of notability and properly dismisses editors' personal opinions. This article is way over the top in terms of evidence of Notability per that guideline. But some people just don't get it, and attack this article, without clearing the threshold of 'TLIKEIT
— User:Dhaluza, 18:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATA||WP:N||WP:IDON (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)