Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Mower
I'm still for keep because, to quote Tryptofish, "I think the page reads as though it's early-stage encyclopedic now.i.e. most of the reasons why the article was nominated for deletion in the first place have been fixed The question is whether it passes , which hinges pretty much entirely on what is now reference #5 (formerly 8) which I believe is now reference #6" and if that source and the others don't establish notability (please check them) then I'm committed to finding more that do, indeed I found two other possibly secondary sources (which I listed above) but I haven't used them in the article yet because I was seeking feedback from Tryptofish as I was taking all of his advice on how to improve the article
— User:Invmog, 17:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)