Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Case no. 16CV300
The sources given, are to peachcourt.comm that requires a login to read - I cannot comment on what is hidden behind the login, the 3 references to an a server without a name is not a  - I cannot associate it with anyone that could be reliable, the other references predate the legislation that this case is about - so cannot be used to establish this case as notable. Most court cases are known by the the names of the litigants involved rather than a court assigned number which makes searching for coverage hard to do - you might want to put that in the article as it would help anyone reviewing this try to find significant coverage in reliable sources
— User:Noq, 19:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:reliable source (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)