Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghil'ad Zuckermann
The subject is prolific, well-cited, controversial inside and outside academia, and has received outstanding awards and fellowships, which, in sum, is notable.  I can see that this 3 year old article deserves several improvement templates, but it does not deserve to be deleted.  IMHO, this 3 year old article is worth saving, and should not be dumped in the ol' bit bin. As for , in this case  should trump.  Wikipedia is better with this article than without.  Wikipedia will be even better if someone were to improve this article
— User:WVhybrid, 03:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Notability)