Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futaba Channel (2nd nomination)
same reason as already stated: popularity does not meet . There is no apparent significant coverage in reliable sources, and what other sites may be using its software is irrelevant. This site fails all  criteria, and all  criteria. It has not "been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself", it has not won any "well-known and independent awards from either a publication or organization" nor is its content "distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster." It has not been demonstrated to be notable by Wikipedia standards. I can't even find a SINGLE reliable source that discusses this site, and the one source in the article is of questionable reliability. No one else has produced any either. Claiming they exist without providing is valueless. just because something uses its code or was inspired by does NOT make it itself notable at all
— User:Collectonian, 18:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:N||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)