Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikael Ljungman (3rd nomination)
The sourcing looks good enough for  and , they cover more than one event (so there's no issue with ) and the long-term nature of the coverage of his misdeeds is enough to meet . The special pleading above that we should ignore mainstream national-newspaper level sources because he has attracted political enemies (what politician doesn't?), because the newspapers have a bias (what newspaper doesn't?) or because his misdeeds were too sensational doesn't sway me
— User:David, 23:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:BIO1E||WP:PERP (Wikipedia:Notability)