Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radicalization
then improve: As the originator of this quickly-hacked-together stub article replacement for a dicdef, I know it's a poor article, but it's a poor article on a valid, ''highly'' notable subject (see http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=radicalization for '''over 24,000''' citations from Google Scholar using the term, many of which have radicalization as their main subject, and http://news.google.com/news?q=radicalization for evidence of coverage in around 1200 |verifiable |reliable news sources in the last few weeks alone), complete with two source citations to demonstrate notability. As such, it needs improvement, not deletion
— User:The, 21:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)