Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phenom (company)
I'm not convinced getting coverage for a public relations exercise counts as coverage of the company (and if that's ''the best'' the author could find, it's even less convincing).  is difficult because it appears journalists use "phenom" as a short form of "phenomenon" far more than I'd have expected ... I'm willing to be convinced, but frankly even if notable the article would need a rewrite from whatever unexpectedly convincing sources turned up
— User:David, 11:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)