Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictive programming
While it could be argued there should be more coverage of 'notable' conspiracy theories on Wikipedia (in their own articles, where they can be shown with the facts that prove they're preposterous), as none of the sites are ever going to be anywhere near , but as policy stands now, it cannot meet , and I see no reason to start with this one. This article would need a complete rewrite in order to be presented in an encyclopedic and factual way.  &#8213;&nbsp
— User:Padenton, 23:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)