Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabbos App (2nd nomination)
because '''1''' the article cites sufficient  & , and adheres to , to make it basically  regardless if it was a trial balloon or has yet to see the light of day it has sparked serious attention and '''2''' because it relates to serious core issues of Shabbat-observant Orthodox Judaism|Orthodox young Jews who are nevertheless addicted to texting and communicating with each other on Shabbat with their smart phones hence the interest in this innovation. '''3''' So this is not a "hoax" nor is it a form of "crystal balling" rather it's something to be treated more in the spirit of  and . '''4''' This AfD comes within days of the first AfD being closed as lacking consensus to delete, meaning there was enough of a  to keep the article and ''not'' delete it. Therefore, one can only conclude that '''5''' the nominator appears very upset that his arguments and POV did ''not'' carry the day first time around and now wants to keep the arguments going, that does seem rather Y and engaging in borderline  behavior to achieve on the fly what was not achieved after almost a month that the 1st AfD lasted. '''6''' Note that way out Theories, even non-existent Faeries and invisible Ghosts, get their own elaborate WP articles even if they never make an appearance in the real world right away or ever. '''7''' The nominator is advised to read up on  and cool it. Thank you
— User:IZAK, 22:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:N||WP:DONOTDEMOLISH||WP:CHANCE||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:POINT||WP:BATTLEGROUND||WP:SPIDERMAN (Wikipedia:Verifiability)