Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of redundant expressions (2nd nomination)
Many, if not all, of these expressions can be sourced to |reliable sources indicating that they are considered redundant. Even if an expression's redundancy is a matter of ''opinion'', it is notable and sourced opinion, which is allowed under both |original research and |neutral point of view policies. Multiple reliable sources have lists of redundant expressions which independently cite some of the same examples, such as "ATM machine" and "PIN number", making this list quite different than the various hypothetical non-encylopedic lists given above. For examples, see ''http://www.amazon.com/American-Heritage-Book-English-Usage/dp/0395767857 The American Heritage Book of English Usage'', pp. 59-65, and ''http://www.amazon.com/Write-Right-Desktop-Punctuation-Grammar/dp/1580083285 Write Right!: A Desktop Digest of Punctuation, Grammar, and Style'', pp. 156-158. The books ''http://www.amazon.com/Words-You-Thought-Knew-Misunderstood/dp/1580629415 Words You Thought You Knew: 1001 Commonly Misused and Misunderstood Words'' and ''http://www.amazon.com/Common-Errors-English-Usage-Brians/dp/1887902899 Common Errors in English Usage'' also include many examples of redundant expressions. Given the wide availability of sources, any problems with this article are solved by editing, not deletion
— User:DHowell, 21:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)