Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trisha Hershberger
Pretty much this quote from the person who contest TH's deletion ''Talk:Trisha Hershberger|Trisha is popular and relevant enough to have a Wikipedia page. Her former co-host, Meg Turney has a Wikipedia page and has far less accomplishments than Trisha'' is invalid at least in regards to this Meg Turney article. It goes against |this Wikipedia policy. Either way it's weird how  ''Meg Turney has a Wikipedia page and has far less accomplishments than Trisha.'' can invoke someone to say that the Meg Turney article is ''in the same ballpark''. Did the person who nommed Turney's article for deletion even realize that there are 20 references for Turney, hardly in the same ballpark as the 0 references on Hershberger's article. Yes, I'm aware that some of those 20 might be removed, but from a person whose made an article for Hershberger before and failed before, I can tell you from experience it was easier to find references for Turney than it was for Hershberger. So, obviously now the Hershberger article should be deleted because it has 0 references, but on the other hand that can obviously be improved upon
— User:Soulbust, 03:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)