Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Goodman (politician)
Wow, I agree that the keep proponents are going overboard. First off, WP:OUTCOMES starts with:This page summarizes what some editors believe are the typical outcomes of past AfD discussions for some commonly nominated subjects. This page is not a policy or guideline, and previous outcomes do not bind future ones because consensus can change. The community's actual notability guidelines are listed in the template at the right. Notability always requires verifiable evidence, and '''all articles on all subjects''' are kept or deleted on the basis of sources showing their notability, not their subjective importance or relationship to something else. All articles should be evaluated individually on their merits and their ability to conform to standard content policies.Secondly, it's damn bad faith to screech that people "only want to delete her because she's on the council." Strange though it might appear, there are actually editors on Wikipedia who vote in deletion discussions on the merits of the argument. If Goodman's vote was in the news because of the Floyd incident, and that's where |significant coverage ''of Goodman'' (as opposed to just of her vote) came from, then that's a BLP1E issue and still a notability fail
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''' ]], 07:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)