Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Were They Thinking? The 100 Dumbest Events In Television History
It seems this is used as a '''reference/citation''' quite a bit, e.g. - http://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1295&context=jolt, https://www.metv.com/lists/do-you-remember-the-star-wars-holiday-special, http://articles.latimes.com/2008/nov/16/entertainment/ca-starwars16, http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/ct-perspec-0206-things-20110206-story.html, http://www.skeptical-science.com/religion/doctor/, http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/a26636/star-wars-holiday-special/, https://www.completeset.com/stories/10-things-to-know-about-the-star-wars-holiday-special-we-all-tried-to-forget-about, http://www.messynessychic.com/2015/11/25/the-sleazy-70s-game-show-for-husbands-sleeping-with-their-secretaries/, http://www.rickstexanreviews.com/2014/12/vows-are-made-to-be-convoluted.html, http://www.rickstexanreviews.com/2013/11/the-citizen-kane-of-star-wars.html - where David Hofstede ranking of the worst shows is deemed to be an expert opinion. However, this does not advance notability of the book itself per the 5 criteria in . I do however think that some of the content here could be used in an article for David Hofstede, and that this would advance Hofstede's claim to notability. A rename is perhaps possible
— User:Icewhiz, 07:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)