Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PARSIFAL
We aren't in the business of creating articles solely on individual studies (and many have a lot more citations) unless they have some actual claim to notability like . I'll also highlight that what we have here is a Waldorf School teacher creating an article based on a primary study, which makes Waldorf schools look favourable. Arbcom has already established Waldorf teachers have a conflict of interest with respect to Waldorf schools; Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Waldorf_education#Conflict_of_interest, so I think this is an open and shut case. Nyttend's statement isn't an argument and is a classic . Hgilbert's argument is a standard  argument
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOHARM||WP:GOOGLEHITS (Wikipedia:Notability)