Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save the Netbooks
Leaving out the COI issue, as I stated on the talk page the sources used in the article do not satisfy notability requirements.  They are mostly trivial sources, or press releases.  None of the stated links fulfill the reliable, secondary sources requirement.  A Google search is not a clear justification for keeping a page in Wikipedia. A site getting 20,000 or 30,000 page hits does not make it notable either.  Those numbers are irrelevant.  I would agree with the comment that the subject can be covered very well under the Netbook article, and this page comes off as propaganda for the website it covers.  As for valid reasons to delete the article, see otability in addition to  as all articles have to meet the general Notability requirements.  To quote from that page: "'Presumed' means that substantive coverage in reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, of notability. Editors may reach a consensus that although a topic meets this criterion, it is not suitable for inclusion. For example, it may violate hat_Wikipedia_is_not|what Wikipedia is not."  Going by hat_Wikipedia_is_not|What Wikipedia Is Not: "Wikipedia considers the historical notability of persons and events. News coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, but not all events warrant an encyclopedia article of their own. Routine news coverage of such things as announcements, sports, and tabloid journalism are not sufficient basis for an article. Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be. Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that individual should be limited to the article about that event, in proportion to their importance to the overall topic." Based on the evidence from these guidelines, this article should be deleted
— User:Iarann, 05:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:WEB||WP:W||WP:W (Wikipedia:Notability)