Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball v Johnson
This article seems straightforwardly to meet |the general notability guideline 'if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list'. Looking at the |event criteria, 'Events are probably notable if they have enduring historical significance'. As a layman, I'd have thought that this case will have a lasting significance in UK caselaw for its role in determining the scope of Malfeasance in office
— User:Alarichall, 13:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:EVENTCRIT (Wikipedia:Notability)