Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quackwatch
I don't see any evidence of non-trivial coverage in third-party sources per . The vast majority of the sources are pages at Quackwatch's website, which also fails to satisfy  ("the article is not based primarily on self-published sources"). The exceptions are generally news articles including very brief mention of the subject
— User:Jakew, 16:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:Notability)