Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory mosque
as article seems to exist to advance a strongly held |point of view on a current controversy.  It tries to create a facade of respectability by listing other mosques through history but doesn't show that this term or anything similar was ever used in connection with those mosques prior to the current controversy.  No attempt whatsoever is made to provide a balance of views.  The Christian Science Monitor reference looks impressive only at first glance - it is an advocacy opinion piece by someone who is spreading this term, and is therefore not an |independent, secondary, reliable source. The second reference doesn't even mention the "victory mosque" and is instead an article about the overall controversy. Both are worthless as references
— User:Cullen328, 15:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)