Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Foulkes
Thought long and hard about this, but ultimately fails the notability guidelines and that concerns both WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. The keep supporters all make the logical fallacy that a sportsperson automatically is notable upon reaching a certain sportive achievement. That's not true. The achievement alone does not do that. It only creates a '''rebuttable presumption'''. As it happens here this darts player only qualified for the tournament through a specific qualifier designed to allow one young player from his country in the draw. He did win his first match, but his opponent was a rather insignificant player himself (ranked around #100 in the world). Foulkes subsequently lost comprehensively against the first significant player he faced. WP:SPORTCRIT clearly states that notability is dependent of the subject having been subject of multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent and independent of the subject. That is what we call |significant coverage. Said coverage does not exist here and the keep supporters have not made any attempt to prove it does. The only existing coverage of this person fall under 
— User:Tvx1, 13:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Notability)