Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P90X (3rd nomination)
While it's not the best article on Wikipedia, it's certainly a notable subject and has been edited over 1,000 times over the past 6 years by dozens of editors. This subject has not lost any notability since the last AFD. A lot of the sources listed in the article do not meet , but at least two do. There are thousands of others available, too. For instance: The Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/sep/13/p90x-exercise-programme-stuart-heritage, US News & World Report http://health.usnews.com/health-news/health-wellness/articles/2013/09/10/tony-horton-talks-p90x-and-whats-next, Esquire http://www.esquire.com/features/how-to-lose-10-pounds/p90x-review-0411, Time Magazine http://time.com/3445032/, ABC News http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/p90x-star-workout-14758432, The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/business/29exercise.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0, and CNBC http://www.cnbc.com/id/37599790...and those are just the tip of the iceberg.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/162.95.216.224|162.95.216.224
— [[User talk:162.95.216.224|talk]]), 21:26, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)