Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cases of penis removal
This is a heavily sourced article, yes, but I likewise believe it runs afoul of  as an indiscriminate collection of information; indiscriminate because in the overwhelming number of cases, no evidence has been proffered as to why this incident or that is notable or noteworthy.  We don't have a List of rape victims - and that's a good thing - for similar reasons.  The one ''other'' reason likewise applies here: that the list is overwhelmingly of cases within the last ten years, the great majority of which presumably involve still-living people, and such sensationalism certainly runs afoul of the intent of .  Finally, to those Keep proponents who claim that this is not an indiscriminate list, the main section bears the heading "Selected cases of penis removal" - "selected" according to which "nondiscriminate" criteria, exactly
— User:Ravenswing, 02:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)