Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civmec (2nd nomination)
I ask that you consider that this is a company that holds a significant Australian military contract. There are a number of sources quoted in the article and in this discussion that talk about this company in detail and go into its activities (particularly on the military work). It does meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and has been significantly improved with sources added since this AfD was started (both industry and non-industry publications). The last version of the article was clearly not notable and was rightly deleted, but this one has been a significant improvement and editors have worked together to significantly improve it. I should also note, that under Wikipedia policies, deletion should only be considered if there is no |alternative to deletion. There is a very clear and appropriate merge alternative here, the company's subsidiary which already has an article Forgacs Marine and Defence. That must be considered before the article is deleted
— User:Deus, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)