Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah M. Tillman
External  biographical information from an independent source is ''extremely important''. To say that it has little bearing or significance is to ignore one of the fundamental criteria of notability guidelines of Wikipedia. The fact that Sarah Tillman has not been the subject of any independent work/review shows that she is not a noteworthy illustrator. As mentioned before |notability is not inherited. That is not to say that without the illustrations the book would've been different. Maybe it was an integral part or maybe it's not. The point is that none of the reviews say anything about the importance of the illustrations (i.e. without them the book would not have been the same) To claim that it does without any citable references goes against Wikipedia's Wikipedia:No original research|no original research
— User:Dysepsion, 21:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)