Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-homosexualism
most of this information into homophobia or Violence against gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and the transgendered and '''redirect''' the article accordingly.  The discussion here from the creator of the article is enough for me to throw |assume good faith to the wind.  Notice how assuming good faith is NOT encouraged in the presence of evidence to the contrary.  Let's review.  Britcom has 'attacked' Herostratus through his ''religion'', claiming that it has a 'pro-homosexual' agenda (note how Britcom uses this AS an attack as if it were a BAD thing. Is it unreasonable that this leads me to question his motives?).  What would we do if an editor who made an arguing point based upon the fact that their 'opponent's' Userpage had a "This user is Christian" or "This user is Catholic" userbox on it? Of course, we would begin to assume BAD faith (as we should).  Britcom also says that the homophobia article has a 'pro-homosexual' POV push.  These are red flags to me, personally, and are enough for me to assume that this article was CREATED as a bad faith POV-fork of homophobia.  That being said, there IS some good information here, and rather than being spent in a POV-fork article, it should be placed where it belongs, in one of the two articles I suggested.  The forthing at the mouth that continues from editors who claim that homophobia does not include opposition to homosexuality or is limited to a FEAR of homosexuals (even though all common sense regarding the usage of the term in actual language would have us believe otherwise) is rather disconcerting and, in my opinion, damaging to the wiki
— User:CaveatLector, 21:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)