Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against men (4th nomination)
The article is poorly written and laden with -type language, but that's not a criterion for deletion. The subject is obviously notable (especially in the context of war and genocide). It just needs a rewrite. I think what some people forget (or are not aware of) is that improvably bad prose isn't a reason to delete an article on a notable subject. My suggestion is that the article be kept, and the poorly written parts either removed or rewritten from a more objective perspective by someone with knowledge and access to appropriate sources on the subject
— User:RHM22, 17:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)