Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashton Kutcher on Twitter
the applicable policy here is |...not case studies, which states that we should be cautious in how we treat "situation X in location Y" or "version X of item Y" types of articles. There ARE enough sources to create articles about ''television appearances of Barack Obama'', ''newspaper coverage of Barack Obama'', ''humor and entertainment of Barack Obama'', and any other number of forks. (And you can see how similar articles could be written for other major public figures.) The principle at play in  is that we can let sources dictate what verifiable content should appear in articles, but not always the proportion or organization of said articles. It's possible that ''celebrities on Twitter'' or some other article would make sense. But we already have Twitter usage and there has to be an intelligent way to fork this, instead of creating numerous articles about case by case by case. Again, |Wikipedia is not a collection of case studies
— User:Shooterwalker, 22:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTCASE||WP:NOT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)