Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koto Okubo (2nd nomination)
as a stub-like bio. Though I don't feel strongly about a merge, if all the content here is merged into some other article (list of oldest people in the world at the time of death). So long as no information is lost, what's the difference in where it is? Lumpers and splitters should both be happy with . I just don't like deleting info, per . The only argument I can see for leaving this a stubbish stand-alone bio, is that, in a sense stand-alone articles, even stubs (especially stubs) invite further contribution in the same manner as a redlink does. Perhaps somebody out there (for example) has a WP:V source for how this woman lived, what she ate, whether she was demented and when (if so), or something about the ages of her ancestor deaths, etc., which will later aid somebody in a hypothesis about the causes of these unusual things. Keeping this a stub is pretty harmless, as she's dead
— User:Sbharris, 00:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SS||WP:NOTPAPER (Wikipedia:Summary style)