Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Raphael Bender
to something but definitely not delete.  I would only support a keep if more independent sources were found.  This seems like a bit of an example of .  This source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/01/17/MNG9NARFJT1.DTL, which is already on the article, has detailed coverage.  There are other sources that cover her in detail too.  However, they seem to be recycled press-releases from the International Solidarity Movement so I think there is some question of whether such sources are independent or not.  I'm not sure whether these sources should be counted in establishing notability--if they are counted I would say she is solidly notable.  Otherwise (and I am leaning this way) I would say she probably isn't, and the content should be merged somewhere...merged, not deleted, because that sfgate article makes the core event--her getting deported for her protests--verifiable.  I think the event belongs somewhere on wikipedia
— User:Cazort, 21:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)