Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard Horowitz
Does this close the discussion?  I'm not versed in deletion protocols, so I don't know where we are in the process.  As long as I'm here: I've gone from '''110% KEEP''' (probably violating  here and there under the influence of my certainty) down to about '''95% Keep''' -- or would that be '''Weak Keep'''?.  This change is a side-effect of earning the dubious distinction of suddenly becoming Wikipedia's #1 expert (probably -- who else would admit it?) on Leonard G. Horowitz. On the whole I'd prefer the side-effects of binge drinking, if a bender could help me forget what I now know about the guy. (Unfortunately I've watched some of Horowitz's YouTube video footage, so he is now burned into my brain as indelibly as certain scenes from Leonard_Horowitz#References_in_Popular_Culture|I Am Legend.)  I'll soon post some discussion at the article's discussion page, about why I think some notability arguments made above (both mine and others) are a little weaker, and why some arguments for deletion perhaps a little stronger, than I originally thought.  This experience has improved my understanding of notability and BLP issues; growing understanding of these issues is another contributing factor in my weakening Keep opinion
— User:Yakushima, 13:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)