Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NHL Draft Steals
The very fact that the opening sentence admits the topic is by nature unencyclopedic makes, to me at least, a very compelling argument for excluding it from Wikipedia.  Croat Canuck's concerns regarding its seemingly arbitrary inclusion criteria are also influencing me.  Finally, I'm not moved by the fact that it's part of a wikiproject, as I don't think the fact that an entry's editors have formally grouped themselves together with a collective name entitles them or their articles to a looser reading of , particularly section 1.7 and the ''overarching principle'' that Wikipedia is not to become an indiscriminate collection of information.  Cruft is cruft, and being part of a wikiproject doesn't, or at least I believe ''shouldn't'' be treated as some sort of imprimatur on cruft
— User:The, 06:59, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)