Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Schonemann
Seems notable on its face per , though the article as written is pretty weak (long prose where a list of works would do, prose/lists-of-works seeming only for the purpose of propping up notability instead of talking about the person and his ideas. However, all claims of being an expert or being originator/major player for novel ideas are self-written (lack of secondary sources). If his ideas about IQ and racism are notable or novel (vs fringe ideas...not to belittle them, as even Nobel Laureats can have fringe ideas), surely someone else would have written review articles highlighting his ideas
— User:DMacks, 18:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)