Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts
as a blatant POV fork. This legal action, which hasn't even reached trial, does not even warrant a separate section in the main museum article yet, (but is does deserve a mention, per the recent poll). The current version of this fork article is just a badly written self important navel gazing essay/blogroll about copyright law and free content, |coatracked on a small piece of noteworthy news, the only decent content herein just duplicates the Wikinews article which presents it as what it actaully is, a news item. It is not yet by any standard, not even NOT#PAPER, a plausible topic for an encyclopoedia article
— User:MickMacNee, 12:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)