Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teodor von Burg (2nd nomination)
vote altered per TimTempleton - cultural differences)  doesn't require that editors spend time analyzing if somebody is important or not. It simply requires we find if enough coverage in independent reliable sources exists. It undoubtedly does, therefore specific sub guidelines from WP:BIO or others are mostly irrelevant - they are there to help make a decision but shouldn't be abused to delete something simply because one has never heard of it or because subject doesn't meet one specific sub-criteria which might not even apply. If this were the one-time winner of some competition, then yes delete per . However, article subject has received |sustained coverage for multiple events and, per , "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times." - The 'Charter of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts', if not the gold medals (which I agree are probably not that important), is clearly such an significant award, being awarded by a national level institution. Judging the intent behind the award is WP:OR and does not render the award moot. Special:Contributions/198.84.253.202|198.84.253.202
— [[User talk:198.84.253.202|talk]]), 16:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:ANYBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)