Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo4j
Although there are quite a few blog-level reports on this software, as well as some industry conference presentations, and even some academic papers mention using it, overall I have trouble finding in-depth coverage in  sources to satisfy . I suspect this article will be recreated at some point after better-known secondary sources write about neo4j. The developers that edit here shouldn't take it hard. After all, the 1st google hit is their own site, on which they can make a better presentation of the product that it's currently possible here given the |rules. (FYI: the Wikipedia article on neo4j is not even in the top 10 ghits
— User:Pohta, 23:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SECONDARY||WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)