Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damaged beyond repair
The OR issues mentioned above are not a reason to delete, of course; I'm not sure why they were brought up.  However, I don't think this neologism quite meets the bar set by .  "Damaged beyond repair" is a common phrase used to describe objects such as equipment, so for example a search for the phrase "damaged beyond repair" yields a lot of results.  However, very few of them are for the usage that is the subject of this article.  There are some; this is a thing that has some usage, to be sure.  But I can't seem to find much in the way of discussion in reliable sources ''about'' the term, other than the trivial mention in the Karazin book that Tokyogirl linked to: "Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources are not yet ready for use and coverage in Wikipedia." (
— User:ErikHaugen, 17:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)