Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Domenech
See: http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/53537792.html?dids=53537792:53537792&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=May+7%2C+2000&author=&desc=An+Early+Eye+for+Political+Punditry this sample of the first several paragraphs of the Washington Post article, which is clearly about Domenech and meets our definition of significant coverage from a reliable source. From what little I saw of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution article (the first two paragraphs http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?s_hidethis=no&p_product=AT&p_theme=at&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_field_label-0=Author&p_field_label-1=title&p_bool_label-1=AND&s_dispstring=Rising%20stars%20in%20the%20Republican%20Party%20AND%20date(08/29/2004%20to%208/29/2004)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=08/29/2004%20to%208/29/2004)&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=(Rising%20stars%20in%20the%20Republican%20Party)&xcal_numdocs=20&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no here), it also appears to be significant coverage of Domenech from a reliable source (although he's apparently one of a number of people featured). This is clear, convincing evidence of otability. Combine it with the scandal and with whatever coverage we have in the article and that the other sources Will provided, and the case for notability is solid, now. Will Beback, thanks for your enormous help
— User:Noroton, 23:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)