Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pataphor
as a neologism. Merriam-Webster doesn't have it, Oxford English doesn't have it, and a look through the first hundred or so Google hits gives a repeated appearance of phrases along the lines of "looked it up in Wikipedia..." which suggests that there are no |reliable sources - other than those that can be tracked right back to here. One single mention in a Chilean newspaper doesn't equate to multiple, non-trivial references. I fully agree with Y, above - when it gets to the point where it's being used in actual reference material, college courses, etc., then I'll give it a bit more credence. Right now, it has no traction, and cannot be |verified
— User:Tony, 16:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)