Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharath Sury (2nd nomination)
Certainly looks like an advertisement promoting the subject. Investment publications do the same for fund managers. Portfolio management is, in any case, not an exact science and  anything to do with investment, as fund managers and conscientious  financial advisors keep reiterating to their clients and potential clients, carries risks and rewards. He may have commented on what other notable people in the field (mentioned in the article) have said to back his statements and/or writings (name-dropping), but that does not, in itself, make him notable, even if Bloomberg has given him the time and space to say what he says. Bloomberg, CNN, the BBC and other similar channels  give a lot of people in the world of finance, be they lecturers, professors or ordinary investors, the opportunity to voice their opinions on a variety of  financial issues of the day. It does not make them or this man notable either. Here today, gone tomorrow! Bloomberg producers are just doing their job, he is doing his, and he is still only a lecturer  in San Diego, leaving aside his incidental work elsewhere. So, still some way to go before he becomes a full-fledged professor, which would  indicate some sort of recognition from his own peers and superiors in academia. I think he does not meet  at present. I note, too,  the timing and similarity in the comments on the talk page and also the similarity in the signature styles of this article's supporters on that page and  on this AfD page
— User:Zananiri, 19:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)