Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chillum (pipe)
Though an  reasoning, we have an article on other pipes, such as Steamroller (pipe). The page in question has been around for almost three years. There is a reference to what it is, and that much is verifiable (as opposed to a "someone claimed this exists" article). The article's content is sufficient so as to demonstrate notability. Is it a very notable subject? No. Is it notable "enough"? Yes. Therefore, at bare minimum combine into a Cannabis pipes article, but I believe that otability and erifiability are minimally met and could be met through additional referencing. Therefore, should be a Keep
— User:VigilancePrime, 23:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OSE||WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)