Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miri Hanai
To make an argument about , you need to argue that the sources themselves are not reliable. Picking what you in your personal opinion think are frivolous quotes is not an argument. (I can find quotes from the same articles that give pertinent information about her career, etc.) Some of these articles are from major news organizations in Japan such as Tokyo Sports, Sankei Sports, ''ASCII'', Asahi Geino, Shukan Playboy, etc., which are used all over the English Wikipedia, especially in entertainment coverage. , again, does not ask us to judge whether the content fits some standard of "serious" coverage (a word it does not use; it also does not mention the word "tabloid"), precisely because it wants to avoid personal bias. The issue is whether the publication sources are "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." If you have an argument that the above newspapers and magazines do not fit that, please present it
— User:Michitaro, 02:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)