Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (2nd nomination)
per  as it is a list of discriminate, useful, interesting, verifiable, important, and encyclopedic information that gets http://stats.grok.se/en/200902/List%20of%20common%20misconceptions over 20,000 page views a month. The article serves a great purpose as a spinoff or sub-article to our coverage of misconceptions by illustrating examples, much as an encyclopedia or almanac article on a country lists cities with that country or on the Academy Awards lists award winners for illustrative purposes. The article also serves a navigational function as a means for those interested in these common misconceptions of having a gateway to our other articles that deal with the reality of the items listed. In any event, it is what editors and readers come to Wikipedia for and is thus consistent with what Wikipedia is. Calling it "indiscriminate" is patently dishonest as it is clearly discriminate, i.e. only miconceptions and only miconceptions that are common and on top of that only miconceptions that are common as verified through reliable sources per . Calling it "trivia" is pure subjectivity as it concerns items that are studied and discussed by millions of people throughout history and in many diverse fields. Dismissing their academic interest is trivial borders on insulting. Some calls to delete and merge should be reminded per Wikipedia:Merge and delete that we cannot delete and merge per the GFDL. Thus, no reasons beyond  has been presented for deletion. Any appearance of policy are guideline based reasons are and have been easily refuted. The truth is that the article clearly meets all of our policies and guidelines with flying colors. Sincerely
— User:A, 17:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTS||WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Lists)