Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Ullman (2nd nomination)
per . The issue is that we need at least a couple of sources that meet the trifecta of reliable, independent and secondary. I cannot find a single one. The only one that might arguably meet these three criteria is a piece in the Berkeley Barb, an underground newspaper that might be assessed as having qualified reliability for 60s and 70s counterculture but doesn't cover a current biography. Our standards for sourcing have tightened in the last ten years, we are much more conservative, and this lacks the quality of sources necessary to create a verifiably neutral biography
— User:JzG, 14:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)