Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science-Fellows Inc.
I think  is appropriate as an analogous guideline: if the only independent attention an academic publisher has received is to be listed as predatory, and they don't even stand out among the list of many predatory publishers (there is nothing unusual about what they do), then they're not notable
— User:David, 18:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PERP (Wikipedia:Notability)