Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Kean
Notability is , so people aren't automatically entitled to have articles just because they happen to be related to other people who have articles. This doesn't claim that she's ever done anything that would have gotten her over any of our inclusion criteria, however — other than her genealogy, literally the only other thing this says about her at all is that she was a hospital volunteer, which is not "inherently" notable work in any sense. And the only useful source present here (reduplicated as two separate footnotes even though it's the same source) is an obituary, which is not enough "coverage" to get a person over  all by itself if it's the ''only'' source anybody can be bothered to find — it also cited an Ancestry.com record to support her marriage date, but I've stripped that because we're not allowed to cite Wikipedia content to genealogy databases. She's not automatically notable just because she existed, and neither the sourcing nor the substance on offer here are enough to get her over the bar
— User:Bearcat, 13:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)