Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaquelín Abdalá
WP:BEFORE asks that nominators consider whether it's a newly created article. Only a few hours had passed since the creation of the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yaquel%C3%ADn_Abdal%C3%A1&oldid=650419904 When the article was nominated it qualified for CSD-A7, asserting no claim to notability, but it wasn't CSDed -- it was AfDed, and for not ''being'' notable, which is another matter. The article was subsequently improved somewhat, with claims to notability added such that it no longer qualifies for A7, and there's no reason to believe it won't continue to be improved. Rather than the condescending, y {{tq|"Gosh! ..."}} perhaps consider the implications of {{u|Creatrixtiara}}'s comment: that as an article created as part of an ongoing event, it will likely continue to be developed over the course of that event. Should it have been created in a sandbox first? You bet. Is the subject notable? I don't know. I don't blame you for trying to have it deleted when you did, but at this point I'd recommend withdrawing the nom and taking another look in a few days. I would also support a '''Move to draft''', which is a good place for a new article created by a new user to start anyway. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 01:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BITE (Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers)