Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reasons to Vote for Democrats
merge; article should be kept (my iVote to ''keep'' is above) for the same reasons that we keep any notable book: because it got an enormous amount of  over an extended period of time, including multiple, full book reviews in significant publication.  (c.f.: The Roger Kimball review in The Weekly Standard: http://www.weeklystandard.com/shooting-blanks/article/2007663 ''Shooting Blanks'': ''"this brief, but comprehensive, inquiry...  covers all the bases: There are chapters on Economics, Foreign Policy, Civil Rights, Education, Homeland Security, Energy, Jobs, Crime, Immigration, and (perhaps the weightiest section) Values. Knowles has covered the waterfront.... his extensive bibliography...  has done his homework: He has drawn on a wide and bipartisan range of works, from Saul Alinsky's classic handbook for community organizers, Rules for Radicals, to Peter Schweizer's critical investigation into the Clintons' finances in Clinton Cash—and many other books."'') Satire book inspiring full length satiric reviews from public intellectuals.   This is what notability for a book looks like
— User:E, 09:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)