Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxx
Article might be worth keeping if it could explain its importance better. Agree with the comments above about lack of  and . Is the language (a) already great, just not widely known, or (b) the germ of something better?  After reading the article, I have no idea
— User:EdJohnston, 20:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)