Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashton Kutcher on Twitter (2nd nomination)
mostly per S Marshall (I don't care for the topic, but it seems to meet our guidelines/polices as they stand).  I'd prefer we move the article to Ashton Kutcher on social media if it is kept however.  Further, I'm having a hard time distinguishing "" from "I don't think this is encyclopedic".  I don't see a case being made that this ''isn't'' encyclopedic other than "it doesn't seem encyclopedic to me" (which is fairly weak) and "not other encyclopedia covers topics like this" which is a lot more reasonable but given the nature of Wikipedia (fast to cover topics) and Twitter (fairly new) it's not a hugely convincing argument that others won't
— User:Hobit, 17:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)