Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Trebus
as even if I'm not fond of keeping this article because his claim to fame isn't that notable. However, considering the presence of multiple secondary sources, it passes . Similarly, your comment on Rrose's edit count is highly irrelevant and rather condescending, Martinevans
— User:Sang, 13:41, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)