Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Comisar (2nd nomination)
I really don't understand the  argument here.  When I search the Google News archive under his full name http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Steven+Robert+Comisar%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a "Steven Robert Comisar", I see many articles about him and his con games in reliable sources over an 18 year period, starting with a horse racing scam in 1990.  If you want to know how extensive and pathological his con games have been, just read http://sabrinaerdely.com/docs/TheCreepWithTheGoldenTongue.pdf The Creep With The Golden Tongue from GQ magazine, in August, 2003.  How can any editor review this material and conclude that Steve Comisar is not notable? The sources show quite clearly that he is
— User:Cullen328, 01:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)