Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Deerhorn
With regards to the BSA comparison, I would think that BSA council camps would certainly be notable and there are several that have articles ... see :Category:Local council camps (Boy Scouts of America).  But even though BSA camps are notable, that's not a useful comparison to this camp, IMO.  If  is the only standard, then you're probably right about notability.  As a corporation, they aren't notable ... but really, I look at something like a camp or school - even ones that are for-profit (I have no idea if this one is - I'm just assuming) as more than just .  I look at them more like , even though they may be for profit.  If sufficient non-self-generated sources can be found to write an article (the  standard), I'm not overly opposed to keeping the article
— User:BigDT, 02:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:CORP||WP:ORG||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)