Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Lane Craig
According to the article, "One of his most notable contributions to the philosophy of religion is his defense of the Kalām cosmological argument." If you look up his book The Kalām Cosmological Argument, there has been little academic interest in it for the last 30 years. His main fame on the other hand seems to be from debates, which received some press, mostly from Christian websites (some fail WP:RS). It is telling that 7 of the sources in his article are from himself or CV and some others are links to youtube. If he ''is'' an academic it should be reflected in the sources. If he is a famous debater when there should be secondary sources, not youtube clips. As it stands the article fails . No notable work in the field of philosophy (or Christian thought), no major award, no major academic position, not the editor of a major journal and never been elected to a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society
— User:VLARKer7, 18:40, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)