Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bargain bin
per criteria 1. "The nominator... fails to advance an argument for deletion".  It is clear from the nomination that the nominator believes this to be a notable subject, as they are proposing to write an article on the subject under a different title. There is an objection that the article is unsourced, but, as the nominator is proposing to write an article on the subject, he either knows there are sources or believes there to be sources. That those sources are not present right now is not a reason to delete. The other objections – reading too much like an essay (which I don't think it does), being "too American" – are content issues, not deletion issues. It's nowhere near  territory. The nominator is free to |FIXIT if he doesn't think it's written very well. The only "benefit" to the nominator's plan is to move the article from Bargain bin to Bargain basement without having to file a Requested Move. This seems an unnecessarily complex way to do an RM.  Just do an RM
— User:Egsan, 16:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:FIXIT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)