Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superbradyon (2nd nomination)
The rule is, on wikipedia, we only discuss things from |reliable independent secondary sources, not primary sources. The only thing in |reliable independent secondary sources, as far as I can see, is "González-Mestres has proposed a theory about Lorentz violations with the goal of explaining high-energy cosmic rays". Everything else in the article, i.e. almost every single sentence in the article, is not based on |reliable independent secondary sources. (For example, someone please show me a |reliable independent secondary source, e.g. a widely-used physics textbook, that discusses the role of superbradyons in non-cyclic pre-Big Bang cosmologies.) Now, don't get me wrong, this is fine content, and it can be written about on a google knol, a blog post, or whatever, but definitely not as a separate article on wikipedia. It can also be mentioned in a few words, or a sentence, or a footnote, in Lorentz_covariance#Lorentz_violation. (I also agree that it should be '''salted''' to prevent re-creation without prior approval, since this is its second deletion
— User:Sbyrnes321, 19:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)