Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (4th nomination)
per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_common_misconceptions_(4th_nomination)&curid=58586939&diff=862152853&oldid=862145625&diffmode=source) There is plenty of  to make the numerous individual topics within the overall topic notable.  As I see it, Wikiipedia is to inform, and this list does just that.  Is it a typical encyclopedia entry?  No.  Is it a typical LIST?  Yes.  If anything in the list is not properly documented in  sources, sure get rid of that. But otherwise, I see absolutely no problem with this potporri of random facts.  It's certainly far more useful than this list of Toronto Skyscrapers that seems to me mostly just a bunch of 
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SECONDARY||WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)