Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemson University football recruiting scandal
We are being way too easy on this article and its "creator" (read "copier" or "sockpuppeteer").  Per the nom, this definitely is an ttack page|attack page, no matter how you slice it and no matter how emphatically the sockpuppeteer (Special:Contributions/ViperNerd|ViperNerd) who created it argues his point to stop debate as quickly as possible (so he can get back to his business of disrupting Wikipedia).  This editor and his socks should be immediately put on the shortest possible leash and banned at the FIRST sign that they are back to their crap (I'll submit the sockpuppet report ASAP).  He is being snide with other contributors (read "Clemson fan") in the discussion above already.  Is there truly anybody who thinks this editor is going to change his ways?  This guy just doesn't get it.  In the last three days, he has engaged in an edit war, violated 3RR (should have been blocked AGAIN for that), had the page protected, used a sockpuppet IP account to be ivility|uncivil (see the last edit history quote above), and who knows what else (does he think we're all blind?).  Contrary to the nom, this should have been submitted as a '''SD|Speedy Delete''' and deleted quickly per the WP policy.  The quality of the original article was poor, read like a pasted NCAA report in its entirety, had ZERO secondary or tertiary sources (hastily thrown together).  It was awful.  It has been doctored up (a waste of time since it should already have been deleted) but still needs significant work.  '''Get rid of this article and its troubled creator
— User:CobraGeek, 14:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:C||WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Attribution)