Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's play
Subject is borderline notable, and the sources scarce. Taking a look at the possible sources DGG presented as compared to the article  content...I would be very shocked. It doesn't take much more than even a second to realize that what the books are documenting and what the article are about are 2 mutually exclusive topics. If this were to be kept, I would probably suggest it being reduced to the stub status it recently had until some reliable sources can by found. (The stub status seems to have been reverted by http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Let%27s_play&action=historysubmit&diff=321304874&oldid=313496429 some anons.) I would also probably heeding the advice of |Neo in this case
— User:Toffile, 03:59, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)