Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Tajmar
The nominator is incorrect on both counts. '''1.''' As the discoverer of a new effect, the subject easily meets criterion 5 of , and the effect has been discussed and researched by independent researchers (e.g. the U. of Canterbury group).  '''2.''' However closely I read the article, I fail to see any evidence of "fringe" science--this is a reputable mainstream scientist doing grant-funded research for a respectable international body (the ESA).  It seems like the nominator strung together several loaded phrases ("coatracking", "fringe theory", etc.) without really understanding what they refer to.  There is no evidence of coatracking, etc. within the article
— User:Freederick, 04:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)