Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Blaylock
the standard per  is higher than simply having been quoted in newspapers; I'm unable to see a criterion there that he meets.  That leaves the general provisions of , however, which he appears to fulfill - "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." I see significant coverage in the Chicago Tribune, CBN News, and other news outlets, none of which are obviously unreliable, so as potentially fringe as this fellow is, he falls within the notability guidelines
— User:DustFormsWords, 02:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)