Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatland
hp|Uncle G}} first of all,  is not applicable here as the name is not given/created/labelled by census authority or any other government body. ''secondly:'' Elected or other politicians use it for politicial/divisive reasons, in that case it doesnt pass it ; as most of the times the term is used in either steriotypical manner (talking about Jat community), or in some sort derogatory and/or crude manner (or humour). These sources do not meet criteria for |reliable sources. The only two reliable sources that "mentioned" the term, was because they quoted the same peron who had used the term. It is as trivial as it can get.''Thirdly:'' Other such terms which are used, like Tristate area, or some "golden triangle" for industries, or toursim; are used by government officially. eg: "the crime rate in tristate area has increased, so we are increasing our efforts to stop it". That was a statement from few years back from the government. Other statements by government can be found like "offering schemes in x-y-z golden triangle to boost industries" or "tourism". There are also numerous articles ''about those'' areas. These articles discuss the subject in depth. Like "what constitutes as tristate, the brief history of tristate, how was the crime in past, the current crime situation, possible reasons/speculations of the increase, government's response to the increase" and so on. The point is, all of these areas receive |significant coverage that too |persistently. Whereas Jatland hasnt been covered by any  in depth. Government doesnt use it officially. It fails , and as explained in first point, it fails . Its a nickname. It exists. But its not notable. —usernamekiran
— [[User talk:Usernamekiran|'''(talk)''']], 09:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:GEOLAND (Wikipedia:Notability)