Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement
The group is described at some length in Forbes and Techdirt - that's enough for me; they meet .  If I took the time I bet they're mentioned by name in some of the many other solid-sounding sources for this article.  I also must reject the notion of "renaming" i.e. changing the focus of the article - it would effectively prohibit an article about a tight, well-defined topic area in favor of what the deletionists usually call a "coatrack", an open-ended exploration of all the different groups that might ever have touched Wikipedia.  For those who ''don't like'' this article, I should point out that this is not a Bugs Bunny cartoon and you can't stop the oncoming train by pulling down the windowshade.  If this article turns out to be a lightning rod, ''good'' - much easier for us to assess the impact of equests for comment/COI with a practical example; much easier to assess the effects of a single-party conflict of interest in an article about a brand new group than one where the argument is about the image of some immense corporation with fifty years of history
— User:Wnt, 17:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:R (Wikipedia:Notability)