Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Z. Williamson (2nd nomination)
The third criteria of  says that an author is notable if that author has (a) created a well known work or body of work and (b) that work is the subject of multiple reviews. First, according to the Stars and Stripes article https://www.stripes.com/former-troops-building-second-careers-in-military-science-fiction-1.417224#.WT5fwuvyvcs, Williamson's books yielded "a half million in sales and several bestsellers." Locus additionally confirms that at least one of his books, "Freehold", was a legitimate bestseller. https://www.locusmag.com/2004/Issues/04LocusBestsellers.html . Both Stars and Stripes and Locus are legitimate, credible sources, and the level of sales they describe establishes that his work is well-known. Furthermore, his work has been the subject of discussion and reviews from major genre fiction sites, including sfreviews.net http://www.sfreviews.net/freehold.html, tor.com https://www.tor.com/2013/07/31/fiction-affliction-genre-benders-for-august/, and Tangent Online https://www.tangentonline.com/print--other-reviewsmenu-263/anthologies-reviewsmenu-107/3634-forged-in-blood-ed-by-michael-z-williamson. Williamson thus meets both criteria of the  standard
— User:AaronCanton, 07:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)