Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple Hauptfleisch
and clean up. Seems to me to satisfy  on several grounds, as stated above. The quality of the article, advanced as an argument by all ''delete'' votes so far, is irrelevant, and the bald and false assertion that it fails ''probably anything else you want to name'' is most unimpressive. (The information in the article is actually not too bad, but agree the article is terrible for other reasons
— User:Andrewa, 06:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SCHOLAR (Wikipedia:Notability)