Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WA007
At the very least, the second article you cite above was created by an active editor with many edits to unrelated pages.  I see no evidence that he's a principal in the company in question.  The first one may very well be a vanity article, but it should be noted that the existence of one article doesn't justify the existence of any others. If the two articles you cite do indeed violate  and , they should probably be deleted as well
— User:Geoffspear, 17:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:VAIN (Wikipedia:Notability)