Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes (3rd nomination)
because there is significant coverage in reliable sources about films getting 100% ratings on Rotten Tomatoes. The next question is, is a list justified? Per , ''"One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed ''as a group or set'' by independent reliable sources,"'' and this has happened: https://qz.com/1138834/rotten-tomatoes-best-reviewed-movie-ever-is-now-lady-bird/, http://ew.com/movies/2017/12/28/rotten-tomatoes-100-percent-fresh-movies-2017/, https://screenrant.com/movies-hundred-percent-rt/, http://www.hindustantimes.com/hollywood/here-are-the-7-movies-that-scored-a-100-rating-on-rotten-tomatoes-in-2017/story-0QCvIFjsA7lcr0wxePgcLN.html, https://www.thewrap.com/movies-100-percent-fresh-rotten-tomatoes-citizen-kane-get-out/. Now, this does not necessarily mean that the list has to be comprehensive, as I do agree that the list is too long as it is. What about determining a cutoff by community consensus? Obviously that has to be done for box-office articles, and we can do that here. Top 10? 25? 50? To address the nominator's points
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTESAL (Wikipedia:Notability)