Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veropedia (2nd nomination)
I stated 2 years ago at the original AFD, ''Delete (without prejudice against recreation when #NEWS surpassed''. The basis was that there really wasn't much evidence it was more than a few brief mentions in the news. The first time round it wasn't clear, and it was highly topical, so benefit of the doubt was then appropriate. But after a start with some press notice, it has now clearly not achieved long term historic note, nor does it really meet the criteria of notability. It is not a defunct once-notable site. It is now clearly a defunct once-''potentially''-notable site, where we can now see that potential was never realized. If that ever changes, recreation is easy
— user:FT2, 01:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)