Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDition
The issue is that Wikipedia has |certain standards for determining notability.  The basic one is that a subject should have '''significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject'''.  Searching on Edition's website will not provide sources independent of the subject.  Blogs are not regarded as being reliable, as anyone can write one with any information (see ). And the FIPP site, whilst confirming EDition does exist and exhibits at trade fairs, falls far short of offering significant coverage, and would not be considered independent as presumably EDition paid for a spot at the congress.  The sort of things we are looking for is a newspaper or trade magazine articles.  Something that says independent sources think that EDition is important enough to write about.  Please also note that Wikipedia also has a policy that you should be  to other editors, which I suggest you are in danger of breaching
— User:Paulbrock, 10:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:SPS||WP:CIVIL (Wikipedia:Notability)