Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollie Hughes (politician)
Every'' candidate in ''every'' election ''always'' receives campaign coverage, so the existence of that coverage is ''not'' an automatic GNG pass that hands a candidate a free exemption from having to pass NPOL by ''winning'' the election — campaign coverage ''only'' turns into a GNG pass for a non-winning candidate on the extremely ''rare'' occasion that the candidate has received so bloody much ''more'' coverage, compared to what every other candidate also gets, that she has a serious claim to being ''special''. But that's not what the depth and volume of sourcing here are showing at all — they're just showing the normal and routine coverage that every candidate can simply ''expect'', not a strong case for enduring |"people will still be looking for this article ten years from now" specialitude. And no, "for about a decade Ms Hughes has served on the Liberal Party state executive, and is listed on their website as the country vice-president" isn't a notability freebie either — the way to make that an article-clinching notability claim is to reference it to media coverage she was ''already'' receiving in that role ''before'' she was a candidate for anything, ''not'' mere mentions of it as career background in the campaign coverage, but there are no sources being shown here that meet the correct standard on that count either
— User:Bearcat, 18:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:10YT (Wikipedia:Recentism)