Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FLEUR
Any promotional content/tone can be addressed on the talk page. I personally am not a huge fan either of the feature lists, but this passes , for example the software is extensively discussed in this white paper on FLAPW methods.{{Cite journal|last=Davidović|first=Davor|last2=Fabregat-Traver|first2=Diego|last3=Höhnerbach|first3=Markus|last4=di Napoli|first4=Edoardo|date=2017-12-19|title=Accelerating the computation of FLAPW methods on heterogeneous architectures|url=http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07206|journal=arXiv:1712.07206 cs}} or this German article{{Cite journal|last=Hardrat|first=Björn|date=2012-11-28|title=Ballistic transport in one-dimensional magnetic nanojunctions:A first-principles Wannier function approach|url=https://macau.uni-kiel.de/receive/diss_mods_00010133|language=en}}, along with its extensive usage. In general, I think there needs to be a new criteria for  since it is a fine line between legitimate accreditation and promotional fanfare
— User:Shushugah, 18:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NSOFTWARE (Wikipedia:Notability)