Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scubaprobe
per . The current article wording also strongly suggests a copyvio. There might be a case for an article on the '''technique''', if it proves notable, but it would have a different title and reuse very little of the existing content, which is all about the '''product'''. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.14.157|101.119.14.157
— [[User talk:101.119.14.157|talk]]), 01:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTADVERTISING (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)