Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isa dreams
The article needs work and may rely too heavily on biased sources. That said I think there is enough RS coverage to pass GNG. Just because a subject may get more coverage from sources unfriendly to a given group or faith identity doesn't make it non-notable. Also sources from outside of a given religious tradition are not automatically unreliable, though I agree with the nom that some of these do look suspect. This looks like one part legitimate content dispute and one part .  I am going to tag it as needing improvement, but I think the topic exists and there is enough out there to warrant coverage in an article
— User:Ad, 16:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)