Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbados–Germany relations
beyond the sole fact that relations exist (which can and doubtless is covered in the apposite articles), the recent expansion is trivial and fictitious. Trivial in that it accords attention to details (eg, the "Agreement between the Government of Barbados and the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany for the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments" - well, it ''sounds'' important, at least) we would not bother mentioning outside "rescue" efforts done on this series of nonsense articles, just because we can (see  for that); fictitious in that no, the actions of Barbadian men in the Imperial British Army, well before Barbadian independence in 1966, ''is not'' a function of "Barbados–Germany relations", and ''is not'' a manifestation of "historical ties", no matter how desperately some may wish to portray them that way. That history is probably notable, but you mention it at (the rather wretched) History of Barbados, at (the equally bad) Military of Barbados (where, by contrast, an ''avant la lettre'' section ''is'' appropriate), at Military history of  the British West Indies during World War II, but not here, for reasons that should be obvious
— User:Biruitorul, 00:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)