Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cockblock (2nd nomination)
sad to say, there are  that mention this http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?hl=en&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&um=1&tab=wn&q=cockblock&ie=UTF-8 maybe due to the seduction fans mad keenness to sell the ideas, which we've seen here. As such I can't in all conscience vote 'delete'. However, this one isn't as notable as Neg (seduction).  We maybe don't need all these as separate articles
— User:Sticky, 02:23, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)