Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globus Cassus (second nomination)
Since submitting this second AfD, I have taken a closer look at the first one, and to be honest, it is a joke. Not one contributor referenced any Wikipedia policies, nor did anyone provide any references or sources establishing the notability of the concept ''in its own right''. The entire argument boiled down to  versus . This article requires multiple, non-trivial references to demonstrate its enduring notability, and these are unfortunately seriously lacking
— User:Jammycakes, 09:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)