Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arpwatch (2nd nomination)
Although I might be incorrect, this article does seems to satisfy the third criterion of . For instance, look at the results I found on https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Arpwatch%22#tbm=bks&q=%22Arpwatch%22+-wikipedia Google Books and https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Arpwatch%22+-wikipedia&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C44 Google Scholar. I would also advise you to look at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arpwatch|previous AfD for this article, in which {{U|Canley}} pointed out multiple significant references in printed third-party books
— User:Biblioworm, 20:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NSOFTWARE (Wikipedia:Notability)