Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosetta Code
Fails all notability guidelines by a wide mile. Multiple Google searches turned up no evidence of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources. I've checked the sources provided by the !voters above, and they are all trivial, tangential or passing mentions at best. Even taken together, they do very little to establish notability. The source produced by Degrees above is a internet forum thread, far from being significant or reliable. Peter.kofler's argument about the lack of sources for community sites is simply special pleading, and contradicts our notability policies and guidelines. A classic case of ,  and . Show me substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent sources, and I'll gladly change my !vote
— User:Dominus, 00:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LOTSOFSOURCES||WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:ITSIMPORTANT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)