Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiff's Treats
Look, this isn't the first time we've disagreed. I've pointed out several times in the past, as have other editors, that your style of inundating the AFD process with lots and lots of references, many of which clearly fail to meet the criteria for establishing notability, is disruptive. You don't need 10 or 20 references (or you wouldn't if you understood and read }}). Just pick the three of four, the best of what you can find. Otherwise it is frustrating when I (and others I'm sure) read every one of your references which is a waste of time. It is disruptive. And I suspect the problem, in part, is that you don't acknowledge  and rely on bland statements such as "sufficient coverage in realiable sources" which, by the way, is not enough of a reason to accept sources
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)