Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNS Theory
per nom, the critical attention Dhartung found is pretty minimal, and I can't quite figure out what, http://knutepunkt.laiv.org/ Dissecting larp is, oh wait! there's a wikipedia article on it, sort of at Knutepunkt about "A live role playing avant-garde movement".  If this article gets merged into Ron Edwards then The Big Model ought to be merged in there too (and maybe Trollbabe while we're at it).  The Big Model is just as bereft of reliable sources as this article is.  The Threefold Model is also totally unsupported by reliable references.  At first glance, Role-playing game theory has some sources, and is the logical home for GNS Theory, The Big Model and Threefold Model, but it's unclear whether any of the reliable sources there support any of these articles.  In summary GNS Theory, The Big Model and Threefold Model are all role playing cruft, unsupported by reliable sources, and of no demonstrated encyclopedic value. As psychological theories they fail 
— User:Pete, 14:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)