Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Neeleman
On one hand he does hold a named chair appointment at a decent law school, which I ordinarily would consider a sign of academic notability (of course, law schools often have bigger endowments and more named chair appointments than other academic departments). On the other hand his scholarly record appears thin: Eastmain's GoogleScholar search returns a grant total of 5 hits and GoogleBooks does not return much eitherhttp://books.google.com/books?tab=sp&sa=N&hl=en&lr=&safe=active&q=%22Stanley+D+Neeleman%22&btnG=Search&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=bus&as_subj=soc. GoogleNews (all dates) search gives 5 hitshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Stan++Neeleman%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8, so there does not seem to be substantial coverage in conventional newsmedia either. It does not seem to me that the subject passes  based on these results. He does appear to be an active practicing lawer, according to his faculty profilehttp://www.law.byu.edu/Law_School/Faculty_Profile?133, which might explain a relative lack of academic impact. It could be that he is notable as a lawer under  but a verifiable case for this has not been made
— User:Nsk92, 07:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)