Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiropractic care: Research and Criticism
No reasons for deletion given that satisfy . This is ''not'' automatically a POV fork, and even some of its opponents in its current form seem to say that it was not one from the start. As the POV concerns may well be valid, I suggest the following solution: Rename back to "Scientific inquiries into chiropractic care"; make sure that the article content matches its title; make sure that the article conforms to ; make sure that it is summarized and linked to as main article per . An article's being biased is not a reason to delete. It's a reason to edit. I share Hyperbole's frustration in seeing a proper spinout article go to AfD
— [[User_talk:Avb|Avb]], 16:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DELETION||WP:NPOV||WP:SPINOUT (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)