Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KOAD-LP
Broad community consensus is that articles should meet either the GNG or an SNG that has consensus.  does not have community consensus, so all votes on the basis of that essay are effectively  arguments. However, the prose in the article is mostly sourced to reliable sources: although the coverage in The Hanford Sentinel is not quite substantial, the source appears reliable and it is verifying some facts. Similarly, the FCC seems to be "reliable" and is "independent of the article subject", although it is a primary source. Above all though, notability is really a test as to whether it's possible to write an article that complies with core content policies (, , ). This article appears to ''mostly'' have sourced prose that complies with all three of those guidelines. As such, I cannot identify a good reason to delete it since the information here may be of use to a reader, it complies with our policies and causes no harm, and Wikipedia is not a  encyclopaedia
— User:ProcrastinatingReader, 14:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NMEDIA||WP:IAR||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:PAPER (Wikipedia:Notability)