Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veropedia (2nd nomination)
I don't have access to http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/infotoday/access/1428661061.html?dids=1428661061:1428661061:1428661061&FMT=CITE&FMTS=CITE:FT:PAGE&type=current&date=Feb+2008&author=Mick+O%27Leary&pub=Information+Today&edition=&startpage=31&desc=Pedia+Proliferation this which seems to be a two page article specifically on Veropedia and Citezendium (according to http://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrder.do?UIN=223723224&ETOC=RN&from=searchengine this abstract) which could be significant coverage. The fact that the site is defunct means nothing according to policy. Deadlinks do not invalidate their original content, and a defunct website itself is no reason to delete per . I believe that the other sources clear the bar of notability
— User:JimMillerJr, 22:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NTEMP (Wikipedia:Notability)