Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Hilton's second album
I have to say, my initial reaction was to remove all links to the new single and the album, as I've done innumerable times, but while the song surely fails #Songs, this album passes #Albums. I've just listened to the radio interview, and the facts from the article are all confirmed by the primary, reliable source Paris Hilton. And while that interview and thus the album announcement is only a couple of hours old, it is already generating significant noise in http://news.google.com/news?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&num=50&q=%22My%20BFF%22%20%22Paris%20Hilton%22&um=1&sa=N&tab=wn the news, and I really ''don't'' need a crystal ball to know that this will increase during the next hours or days to become definitely notable (and I urge the closing admin to check this at the time). In particular, it is '''not''' a violation of , since it is ''verifiable'' and ''of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred''.I agree that the article creation was premature and could have waited a couple of days, but deleting it now is very |POINTy. A merge to Paris Hilton or her Paris Hilton discography|discography is the least that we should do, and as before I say we keep it
— User:Amalthea, 21:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Notability)