Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Bloom (Boxer)
WP:NBOX isn't very good with pre-1970s boxers, so I don't think it not being met matters much (I know some editors equate not meeting a guideline as a presumption of not being notable).  In Bloom's era there were few regional titles and 1 world title for 8 weight class each (8 total).  Now there are 4 world titles (or more) for 17 weight classes (68 total).  Hard to hold to the same standard.  With that, I googled him to try to find if GNG was met.  I quickly found a number of good/great sources such as https://books.google.com/books?id=-Oc_AQAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA16&lpg=RA1-PA16&dq=Phil+Bloom+boxer&source=bl&ots=DNd3YfFZM5&sig=roEaR9CtM2SqXTBXVRpN9D-TZCA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UXtKVdWWGMalNuPQgLgI&ved=0CC0Q6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=Phil%20Bloom%20boxer&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=sO2pBT9g9lwC&pg=PA118&lpg=PA118&dq=Phil+Bloom+boxer&source=bl&ots=oZF-R4qGZh&sig=vnaCMAChQ0z3saSMYWQMgfgA3IU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UXtKVdWWGMalNuPQgLgI&ved=0CDoQ6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q=Phil%20Bloom%20boxer&f=false, http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9801E4DD143CE533A25755C2A9649D946195D6CF, https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1915&dat=19170915&id=avwgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=m3UFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2190,1328671&hl=en, http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2008/nov/07/boxing-joecalzaghe, and https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1144&dat=19170902&id=q0UbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aUkEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5132,337618&hl=en.  Considering the time when he fought (i.e., harder to find sources for someone who fought 80-100 years ago), finding this many sources with relative ease is a good sign.  Looks like he meets  and therefore keep
— User:RonSigPi, 20:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)