Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth L. Gardner
Note for HEYers - ing the article with lots of sources with passing mentions (or with no mentions at all) does not help !voters at AfD assess this (and is an indication, actually, of lack of notability). Subject is dead, so no BLP concerns nor is PROMO a big issue (given she's been dead for a few years). The photograph itself is possibly notable per itself (and having a Photograph of Elizabeth L. Gardner seems silly (we could - but it would end up being the same thing - describing the individual in the photo - so might as well have have the bio if its one individual)). There does seem to be some coverage e.g. -https://www.rrstar.com/news/20190518/muralists-rediscover-female-rockford-pilot-history-nearly-forgot rrstar, https://books.google.co.il/books?id=BEkEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&dq=Elizabeth+Gardner+WASP&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Elizabeth%20Gardner%20WASP&f=false life, https://books.google.co.il/books?id=c89LN66l9M4C&pg=PA110&dq=Elizabeth+Gardner+WASP&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjroIPe9bviAhWNqaQKHQ-DDhkQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=Elizabeth%20Gardner%20WASP&f=false this book. There's a bunch of snippet view hits in google-books (some of them from periodic war-time newspapers). Sourcing level here isn't great - but there does seem to be quite a bit of it
— User:Icewhiz, 14:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:REFBOMB (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)