Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations
I've kind of had my change of  reverted, though I presume it was just because of a misunderstanding. It's probably going to be a controversial change, however. Thinking about it more it seems very strange that an academic book can meet the criteria for a book and still not be notable. I mean, it is a book, isn't it? Would anyone like to attempt to show how it doesn't meet the normal criteria for a book? By my reckoning, it meets them with relative ease, whereas a lot of similar book articles here seem to come up short of the mark (many don't have a single citation, though I rarely see them going in the AfD direction). I appreciate that it's pretty weak on the citations, but I think if it meets the criteria for any book as outlined it the nutshell, it should therefore be notable
— User:Richard001, 00:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)