Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooklyn Artists
Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists says, "Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and tables." {{user|Northamerica1000}} https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FBrooklyn_Artists&type=revision&diff=669703132&oldid=669702205 has shown with several sources that "List of artists from Brooklyn" is a notable topic.I also agree with {{user|postdlf}} that several of the "delete" votes advance arguments that conflict with the guideline Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates#Overlapping categories, lists and navigation templates are not considered duplicative, which says: It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic.  These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative.  Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and |should be avoided. Another argument for deletion is , which has four bullet points: (1) Summary-only descriptions of works, (2) Lyrics databases, (3) Excessive listings of statistics, and (4) Exhaustive logs of software updates. None of these bullet points can be applied to "List of artists from Brooklyn
— User:Cunard, 18:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATA||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)