Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle time
Per {{u|Andrew Davidson}}'s list of sources and many, many others in e.g. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22circle+time%22&btnG= this GScholar search.  Further, nom fails to give valid deletion rationale. Claim that it reads like an essay shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how notability is judged.  The fact is that the article could read like an essay written by a semi-literate third grader and it wouldn't mean a thing at AfD, where we evaluate articles based on the sources in the world rather than the lack of sources in the article in its present state per . Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
— [[User talk:192.160.216.52|talk]]), 19:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ARTN (Wikipedia:Notability)