Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cushitic peoples
I beg to differ from all of the votes and comments above. I see this as no more controversial or spurious than articles like Bantu peoples, Austronesian peoples, and Uralic peoples. However, Niger-Congo peoples would be spurious and . Although some people argue that the concept of ''Cushitic peoples'' is a made-up one with no basis in scientific reality, the fact is that there is much more concerete genetic and archaeological evidence backing this up, at the level of Bantu, Austronesian, and Uralic rather than Niger-Congo or Afroasiatic (in other words, ''Niger-Congo peoples'' or ''Afroasiatic peoples'' certainly shouldn't be created because there's not much evidence for such proto-ethnic groups). ''Cushitic peoples'' is a concept very well known in Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Somali, and it wasn't just some recent  project made up several years ago by random Wikipedians. Also, what do we do with the other language versions
— User:Greenwhitedino, 12:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)