Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video game collector and limited editions
yet again.  This list certainly hasn't become less encyclopedic since the last time.  Let's go over the points again. 1) It's not suitable as a category because this list has annotation which is essential to the encyclopedic value.  2) This is not an indiscriminate collection of information; it's tightly focused, organized, referenced, and encyclopedic.  3) While it's true a general encyclopedia would not usually include this level of detail on this topic, a specialized video game encyclopedia probably would; Wikipedia, being |not paper, is often both general and specialized.  4) This list compiles specific information from numerous separate articles into one location; restricting this information to the individual game articles reduces the encyclopedic value of the information by making it almost impossible to compare entries to each other
— User:LtPowers, 14:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)