Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruenor Battlehammer (2nd nomination)
the nominator's claim that sources 2, 5 and 6 are primary sources is debatable;  the primary source materials mentioned here are sources 7,8 and 9, the published novels in which the article subject is a character.  Sources 2,5 and 6 are sourcebook materials ''based on'' the character defined by the primary material, in that they distill the characterization defined by the novels into usable game mechanics.  The fictional characterization section is rather too large and too world-specific, but that is a matter for article cleanup by editing, not AFD (and time and real-world commitments permitting I may take a stab at that).  '''Additional Comment''':  the nominating editor is politely but '''firmly''' reminded of ;  you are not the closing editor and it is not your place to decide whose comments '''should''' be discarded from the consensus assessment.  Otherwise, your nomination and subsequent comments can just as easily be boiled down to 
— User:Vulcan, 23:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CIVIL||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Civility)