Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nendasji
Though the nomination may be terse, I am inclined to agree. I came upon the article tagged for speedy deletion for criteria #A1, but was ''just'' able to figure out enough context for the article to survive. I then set about trying to locate additional sources and failed to come up with anything. I think AfD is the right process for this, since it gives time for sources in other languages or with other spellings to be produced to verify that this is, indeed, a notable temple. I'll be watching, of course, in case that happens. As it stands, this temple not only doesn't ''|verify'', but doesn't even seem to ''imply'' encyclopedic importance
— User:Moonriddengirl, 18:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CSD||WP:V (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)