Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrotheology
User|Koavf}}'s reason for AfD is not a reason for deletion. As stated in , "Disputes over page content are not dealt with by deleting the page." This is a discussion that needs to start on the article's relative discussion page. I think {{User|Garbage Collection}} put it concisely that it "would be a stub forever if there would be no mention to the film," and that's similar to what I thought when I added the mention of of the film -- strictly for reference to continue to expand the article, which there are many references (170) available from the film's website. I used the term myself even to describe to people about native american beliefs and paganism (which astrology alone doesn't cover). Part of the reason is stated as neologism, but that would mean that should shouldn't be on AfD but should be merged with another article. There is, however, no other article that I found that mixes astrology, astronomy, and religion in what astrotheology covers. I made a contribution to Wikipedia to help '''expand''' this article. I hate to see AfDs be used to prevent contributions. &mdash
— User:Dzonatas, 21:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DP (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)