Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China exclusion policy of NASA
although perhaps a single sentence or two could be salvaged and placed in NASA and / or China–United States relations.  Overall this doesn't seem to have enough cohesive coverage as a single unified topic to justify an article. As it is this article has a y feel to it - taking a bunch of disconnected stories, tying them around public law 113-6 (which has almost no direct coverage), and giving it an intensely overbearing name to make it sound far more significant than it is. But public Law 113-6 has https://news.google.com/search?q=%22public%20law%20113-6%20%22&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen almost no news coverage and its only impact seems to have been a single incident, which itself received minimal coverage and was quickly resolved
— User:Aquillion, 17:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:No original research)