Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodi Livon
Reading through this discussion it appears that all of the general notability requirements have been met. Significant and continuous coverage for years (at least 11) from reliable sources, including: KSTP (Minnesota), KARE 11 (Minnesota), North Dakota Today (North Dakota) and numerous national featured articles and appearances in the news, radio shows and podcasts - per {{ping|WikiBotEli}} previous edits. After the recent changes the article has 25 sources, many of which are from reputable, reliable, and independent news agencies. The primary criteria for General Notability Guidelines of “significant coverage,” “reliable,” and “independent” have clearly been met beyond the minimum requirements . {{ping|Serial Number 54129}} referenced   which states “contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion.” I see all of the sources as being valid, reliable sources . With the  having been deleted, what continues to be specific issues up for discussion? Is it just a matter of opinion for notability or is there specific reasoning that the original issues that we’re up for discussion have not been remediated
— User:Info, 18:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLPSOURCES||WP:RS||WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:Notability)