Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernie Siegel (2nd nomination)
I think the sales of the book from 1986, and its longterm presence on the bestseller established a pop culture recognition which, though perhaps waning, is still in play--as mentioned above, this is not my bailiwick, but even I'm familiar with his name. I don't know what the mainstream take is on his theories, and whether they're regarded as fringe, but if sources can be found which address this then it would be relevant, so long as it doesn't violate . And given the activity around this I imagine enough eyes are on the article to insure balance. As a throwaway observation what's impressed me about this process is the crafting of an acceptable article via a sometimes mildly contentious exchange. Special:Contributions/99.156.65.73|99.156.65.73
— [[User talk:99.156.65.73|talk]]), 13:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)