Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Beesley (3rd nomination)
I disagree with the idea a resignation makes one less notable.  Angela does easily meet 's requirements for multiple reliable sources giving non-trivial coverage, so there's no "nn" arguement to be made here.  But obviously we have failed with this biography, which I think is a shame.  We're unable to protect from trolling junk.  I think this deletion sets a sad, but unavoidable precedent.  If this is deleted, we must now honor all similiar requests by the "notable but not famous".    Also, if we make this permanently fully protected as deleted (or redirected), we certainly have no justification for denying at least permanent semi-protection to any other living biography with problems.  To those who say we should just fix clean the article up, I say, we had our chance and we blew it
— User:Thivierr, 04:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)