Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unconscious - The Real Life
Sushil, I think you still don't understand why this article is at AfD.  To summarize: there is a theory or philosophical concept called "Unconscious - The Real Life", laid out in a self-published website at weebly.com. You are trying to write a Wikipedia article about the contents of that site.  But self-published essays are |unreliable sources, and new theories (even if they are a synthesis of the work of existing scholars and researchers) are |original research.  Both are unacceptable on Wikipedia.  Are you the author of the material?  You do say you are trying "to make the philosophy as an acceptable view to all of us".  In other words, you want to promote the concepts to a wider audience.  Good luck with that, but you can't do it on Wikipedia.  Wikipedia only publishes articles about things that are already known and documented, it discourages people linking to websites they control or have written, and it strongly discourages people from writing about subjects to which they have a close personal link (such as a new concept they have developed, for example). "Unconscious - The Real Life" is at AfD because there's no evidence at all that it describes an established philosophical concept that has been covered '''''under that name''''' in books, academic journals, news articles or other reliable sources.  Unless that evidence is provided, the subject is unsuitable for Wikipedia.  JohnCD's suggestion of Wikademia is a good one
— User:Karenjc, 22:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)