Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word Structure
No secondary sources analyze this journal, its founding or anything else. This is a violation of  and should be grounds for deletion. The article makes no claim of notability, and contains no encyclopedic information whatsoever, and should be deleted under . The article reads like a directory entry, which #DIR|Wikipedia is Not. #DIR is a olicy, and trumps , a mere guideline, and certainly trumps otability (academic journals), which did not achieve consensus when it was floated. DGG's argument that corporations whose business is indexing journals have, in fact, indexed this journal doesn't carry much water for me. Do these indexing services only index the most important or impactful journals? ''Is it Wikipedia's job to ''index'' all the hundreds of thousands of journals that happen to be indexed by some for-profit company?'' I say no
— User:Abductive, 22:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PSTS||WP:A7||WP:NOT||WP:P||WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:No original research)