Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coronavirus pandemic anti-Muslim riots in India
The ''Keep'' comments don't hold water because hoaxes and conspiracy theories also get coverage in reliable sources. Being |covered by reliable sources isn't enough and the subject must abide by . Why there is no article about Anti-Chinese reactions to the Coronavirus Pandemic, given Chinese people are the biggest victims of coronavirus-based discrimination? I also wonder why there is no Anti-Muslim reactions to the Coronavirus Pandemic in the United Kingdom,https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/anger-wing-uk-voices-predict-ramadan-virus-spread-200413170844190.htmlhttps://www.arabnews.com/node/1655056/worldhttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/05/police-investigate-uk-far-right-groups-over-anti-muslim-coronavirus-claimshttps://www.newsweek.com/islam-muslims-coronavirus-lockdown-ramadan-islamophobia-1498499 Anti-Muslim reactions to the Coronavirus Pandemic in the United Stateshttps://www.businessinsider.com/trump-claims-mosques-could-avoid-lockdown-accused-of-islamophobia-2020-4https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-churches-mosques-minnesota/false-claim-minnesotas-government-allowing-mosques-to-remain-open-while-churches-must-close-amidst-covid-19-outbreak-idUSKCN2232DEhttps://dailytimes.com.pk/599089/islamic-organisation-slams-trumps-divisive-attempt-to-target-muslims-during-coronavirus-pandemic/ despite being ''widely covered'' by reliable sources? We can agree that this |POVFORK reeks of POV pushing. Sources are only sharing variety of opinions already covered at 2020 Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi, and as such this POVFORK lacks notability independent of that subject
— User:Azuredivay, 21:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:GNG||WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)