Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998 Manila blackmail incident
Honestly, I'm guessing that this AfD is a on't be a fanatic|knee-jerk reaction by the nominator after I've inserted it back to the "See also" section of Manila hostage crisis for policy rationale I have cited and explained Talk:Manila hostage crisis#|here, per . Also, backing it up with the two different (unrelated to each other since one is from Hong Kong and the other from Philippines) newspaper sources. Furthermore, he has Talk:Manila hostage crisis#NPOV of article is being undermined|insinuated that I am writing from HK perspective when I am in fact from Singapore. The fact that I'm not writing from HK or PH perspective is thus bringing into the article a neutral third party's opinion, and my opinion right now is that this article "1998 Manila blackmail incident" is relevant and has been backed by two different |verified |reliable sources whereas the nominator has went on a spree of adding weasel word. This, my friend, is no different from on't be a fanatic|behaving like a fanatic. That is all
— User:Dave1185, 04:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:D||WP:ALSO||WP:VERIFY||WP:IRS||WP:D (Wikipedia:Disambiguation)