Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Ryne Goldberg
rarr; '''Keep''' (see below) - Here's a hypothetical: let's say the FBI announces tomorrow "ah we made a mistake. we meant to arrest this kid's neighbor" and all coverage of Goldberg rightly ceases. If the article were then nominated for deletion, would you !vote to keep or delete it? If you say we should delete it in that case, you should say we should delete it in this case. This is the sort of reason  exists and why  requires coverage over a period of time. We don't know whether coverage of this person will continue. All we have are news reports from over a span of a few days based on an arrest and various alleged connections. If it weren't a BLP, there might be room to say "well it's obvious the subject is going to continue receiving coverage", but because of  and particularly CRIME, which tells us we should exercise extreme care when talking about people notable only in connection to a crime, we should be deleting now and recreating later if coverage continues and/or if he is found guilty. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 16:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:BLPCRIME (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)