Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Euthanasia (2nd nomination)
Yikes. A heads up would-be and current participants: a flood of people who have made almost no edits to Wikipedia other than to opine in a discussion like this is typically taken as a sign of |canvassing and tends to give experienced editors the impression that people must be canvassing because the article would not be kept if left to others to apply Wikipedia's guidelines (see also ). As it happens, I agree it should be kept, but a word of advice: unless you're providing new sources that meet standards presented at , you're not doing your position any favors simply by jumping in. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 16:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CANVASS||WP:SPA||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Canvassing)