Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RandR
With a simple -type of search, I added three book refs and a Linux Journal ref to the article verifying some basic facts about RandR and its clients. There is clearly secondary sourcing for the basics of this protocol and its clients. I'm not sure there is enough depth on these sources to support a standalone article. But verifiable content, per policy, should be |preserved if reasonable. In this case, a selective merge to X.Org Server is a good approach to preservation. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
— User:Mark, 22:54, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)