Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoo (3rd nomination)
Not convinced from the previous discussions that this article is notable. It may have been fulfilling notability criteria back when it was first created, but not in the modern day. "Keep" arguments that it was mentioned in several books but said books appear to be  sources rather than secondary ones. A clear example of something that belongs on Wikia rather than Wikipedia
— User:Zxcvbnm, 04:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:No original research)