Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augustus Sol Invictus
The fact that this person is an unelected candidate doesn't fail the article on  because he has had some coverage supported by sources significant enough to provide a degree of notability.  My main concern with the article is that it shouldn't be a vehicle for self-aggrandizement, as Greyfell wrote. In view of the fact that he seems to be on a political campaign at present, that's an important and current concern. Parts of the article fail  and either have no sources or have the person himself as the source.  With those elements taken out, I don't believe the article has much left. If it is retained, that must be resolved.  I agree that it's possible the article might be added again after deletion, but that is not a reason to keep it. At this moment in time, I fall very slightly on the side of deletion but am primarily Neutral
— User:Twistlethrop, 00:40, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)