Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Waldman (2nd nomination)
and nominate Nooka for deletion. A company that needed $90K to stay afloat from an https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/nookrono-chronograph-watches-by-nooka#/ Indiegogo campaign is truly tiny. They also dare call their products chronographs when what they really sell is plastic pieces https://www.google.com/search?q=Nooka&source=lnms&tbm=shop&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiKqajgntTiAhVxuVkKHdAtD0AQ_AUIECgB&biw=1536&bih=750 like this. Both articles do not mention anything negative about either Waldman (failure of his design studio Berrymatch aka apartment in Chelsea) or Nooka which teetered on extinction ever since 2008. These things are in the sources, but not the articles. Also, this company does not maintain sales offices around the world nor does the source support that (it's actually one which speaks of Nooka as a warning for startups). Both pages stink to high heaven of  and/or . And to some extent it worked (one sources tells its readers to learn more about Nooka by reading the Wikipedia page). His claim to fame seems to be he designed a single watch for Seiko once upon a time (before Nooka) which is now being presented as "commisioned work" done by Nooka. Neither Waldman nor his company come anywhere close to notable. The Wikipedia articles do not represent the truth in any objective or balanced manner
— User:SVTCobra, 07:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROMO||WP:VANITY (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)