Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CryEngine 3
That the software is unreleased is irrelevant, as is the fact that nothing has been tied to the technology yet - it has no impact on the |notability. Importance, maybe, but that's an entirely separate issue. There's a fair bit of coverage out there for this. CRYSTAL only applies with the absence of sources, and while I don't usually go with posting Google results, http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=cryengine+3&btnG=Search&meta= just look. Joystiq, Kokatu, IGN, GameSpot, CVG, GamePro, Eurogamer, and more covering the announcement, plus features including interviews and development progress in substantive detail (ie not trivial coverage). It ''is'' early days yet for the engine, so there isn't much variation between sources at this time, but the information is there none-the-less. Worst case scenario is a merge (not a plain redirect) to Crytek, but I don't believe that to be necessary
— User:S, 20:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)