Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Joshua Danao (2nd nomination)
I nominated one of the earlier versions for a speedy and this current version has no more merit.  Highly promotional and underwhelmed with verifiable sources. Very clearly not notable and fails . I did wonder whether it might actually be a hoax but I will accept it may just be self aggrandisement. '''''&nbsp
— User:Velella, 06:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)