Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plant creatures (Dungeons & Dragons)
or merge if we must.  What strikes me about this article is that the list is quite incomplete (c.f. http://monsterfinder.dndrunde.de/results.php?id=1542252170&skip=0 Monster finder) and that there is a lot information missing about the entries that are there. There are many secondary sources out there, such as http://monsterfinder.dndrunde.de/ D&D Monster Finder, http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page D&D Wiki and http://www.d20srd.org/index.htm the d20 SRD; D&D Monster Finder has content under fair use and D&D Wiki has some community content transferred with permission of WoTC, but no commercial licensing as far as I can tell. So they seem independent of WoTC. While these aren't news organizations or academic publishers, I don't doubt the fact checking by passionate D&D enthusiasts is better than most news organizations. Although they may not fit the traditional WP mold of a RS, I'd be comfortable with considering them reliable, especially with primary sources available to do our own fact checking. If by consensus such list sources are not considered notable, creating individual articles for each notable monster type may be the way to go. A merge the information, per , would not be my first choice, but would be acceptable
— User:Mark, 21:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Editing policy)