Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denialism (2nd nomination)
The several |sources listed in this AfD should be reinserted or more clearly highlighted within the article. The  claims seem perjures or somewhat vindictive rather than substantive. The article is far, far from feature quality, but considerably better than many others here. It could be improved, but it fills an apparent niche that covers the more general topic of denialism. &mdash
— User:Willscrlt, 05:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)