Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AJ Raval
The individual in question has received extensive coverage in a number of reliable media sources, including ''CNN Philippines'', ''The Manila Times'', and ''The Philippine Daily Inquirer''. Many of them have to do with her starring in Viva Films productions, not really gossip: https://cnnphilippines.com/videos/2021/4/23/Diego-Loyzaga--AJ-Raval-team-up-for-movie--Death-of-a-Girlfriend-.html, https://www.manilatimes.net/2021/04/30/lifestyle-entertainment/show-times/diego-loyzaga-and-aj-raval-proud-showbiz-scions/868635,https://entertainment.inquirer.net/418910/the-daughter-also-rises-aj-raval-forges-her-own-path, https://entertainment.inquirer.net/411259/career-boosting-portrayals-from-diego-and-aj-in-noirish-rape-slay-whodunit, https://mb.com.ph/2021/08/07/what-aj-raval-did-for-love/. I don't think subjective assessments of the figure's worth is really relevant to this discussion. I'm sure much coverage of Paris Hilton would similarly be criticized as "vapid gossip coverage" but that doesn't have anything to do with her notability, or the fact that she has received coverage that is NOT "vapid gossip coverage" (i.e. one doesn't cancel out the other). Moreover, if being the beneficiary of nepotism were a legitimate criterion for non-notability (and I can't find anything on any guideline that says so), half of Hollywood wouldn't be considered notable. Per , an actor is notable if they have "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." The individual in question has at least two lead roles in two Viva Films productions. They have also appeared in at least 6 different Viva Films productions, not to mention her appearances in ABS-CBN television series. I would also just like to remind: per , "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article." Therefore, however many references currently exist in the article in question is immaterial to questions of notability. Additionally, per ultiple sources, "based on existing Wikipedia community norms, it seems that challenges to notability are successfully rebuffed when there are three good in-depth references in reliable sources that are independent of each other." I have provided 5 sources
— User:Koikefan, 03:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NOTE||WP: M (Wikipedia:Notability)