Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPS Airlines Flight 6
We are invited to consider whether the article fails notability under the policy  which in turn asks whether the subject of the article has enduring otability.  then gives clarifying remarks which lead me to suspect this subject is "enduring". In the guideline otability it seems to me the only aspect by which this well-referenced article could "fail" is the general notability guideline where, because all five criteria seem to me to have been met, the article has a presumption of meeting the notability criterion for being kept. The matter is then referred to consensus. So, in this case there is no policy for deletion and we are asked to try and decide amongst ourselves whether the article is worth keeping. The matter becomes quite subjective. I happen to think the article is very well worth keeping and I note there are detailed bodies of such information for the UShttp://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/month.asp and UKhttp://www.aaib.gov.uk/sites/aaib/publications/formal_reports.cfm, for example, aimed at a broad audience. For me, merely not liking articles about air accidents and observing that they are reported as news, is nowhere near enough to sustain a delete argument. I think this nomination is unhelpful to the encyclopedia
— User:Thincat, 21:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)