Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiyamalen Thavandiran
Per Nom, {{U|Brittle heaven}}, and some "keep" !votes that advance that the project covering criteria (NCHESS) for inclusion is either wrong or not on par with WP:GNG meaning there is a split notability criteria according to fancy. Aside from the dead links there is another issue of notability of a |BLP being presented by largely |primary or non sources that I should point out does not advance notability. Instead of pointing out where past Wikipedia consensus is wrong I would think providing |reliable and independent sourcing a better route. It might also be a good idea to present these types of comments for discussion at the relevant projects for a criteria change, including the "unofficial" Wikipedia:WikiProject Chess project with 355 editors, and not here. It should further be noted that non-independent or primary sources that just present a score card is not usually acceptable to advance notability. Since the International Olympic Committee considers chess to be a sport I suppose the criteria of  might be included
— User:Otr500, 23:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:SPORTBASIC||WP:primary||WP:independent (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)