Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paperstone
even absent the allegations of paid/ editing, the quality of article's references fall far closer to the "A7 threshold" than they do to the most generous possible threshold to avoid deletion at AFD.  Also, the vast majority of companies with only £2 million of revenue in a year will fail .  Any admin seeing this after it's been open 24 hours should ''consider'' a -close if the overall circumstances fit.  Also, if this winds up being speedy-deleted as a page created by a banned or blocked editor AND if there is enough participation at this AFD that it ''could have been deleted'' by an early-close of this AFD, consider closing the AFD as "deletion pre-empted by speedy deletion, but closing this AFD as DELETE to allow for speedy-deletion if it is re-created
— User:davidwr, 23:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:N||WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)