Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two hundred fifty-sixth note
I see no evidence that this is original research, in fact I think it's likely that the note exists. However, there's no indication that it's ever been used, and even if it has, it's incredibly rare. I don't agree with DGG's non-abridged encyclopedia idea; we all know that the |Notability criteria means that lots of things don't get included in all fields
— User:Ged, 14:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)