Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bratz products (2nd nomination)
Wouldn't this section from  be enough to show that this is notable?  "The list may be a valuable information source. This is particularly the case for a structured list. Examples would include lists organized chronologically, grouped by theme, or annotated lists."  It is a structured list organized chronologically. Other than that, I really have no desire to see this on Wikipedia because it isn't something I care about.  It was also decided to be notable in the first AFD; although, I am fairly certain that is irrelevant
— User:Ryan, 20:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LISTPURP (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)