Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insanity (Home exercise program)
Stacks of |G-hits, but many of them are of dubious quality, e.g. obviously sales and promotional based sites. I read quite a few reviews and they were all very promotional in style rather than being objective third party assessments. I have a feeling that the people behind this system are very good at web promotion and generating buzz (as evidenced by their P90X scheme being the most shown infomercial in the US). Coupled with the promotional style of the original version of the article (which was speedy deleted under G11) I'm not convinced the subject is notable enough. The sheer volume suggests it may be, but I'd like to see some better quality sources that are more obviously indepedent. e.g. articles in mainstream press discussing its popularity (as was provided on the Beachbody Inc.|Beachbody article). If such citations were added my vote would probably change to keep
— User:ThePaintedOne, 16:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GHITS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)