Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Crowther (ecologist)
In terms of reliability and independence, all information included in the article is published by established outlets (as listed above). I have updated the article to include citations of his peer reviewed research. In addition, I have included references to a citation index which show it is in the top 5% of research for impact (and the 99th percentile for researchers of his age) to demonstrate that this research is at the forefront of its field https://nature.altmetric.com/details/14191295/news https://www.altmetric.com/details/4464950. I have also now updated the article to include citations from secondary sources. These include academic review articles (which summarise the most significant, up to date research in this area and reference his work e.g. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article-abstract/175/5/716/532080/the-deep-history-of-earth-s-biomass?redirectedFrom=fulltext as well as textbooks which directly reference Prof. Crowther’s work https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128127667/soil-carbon-storage. These both fulfil the requirements in the  notability guidelines for criterion 1
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SCHOLAR (Wikipedia:Notability)