Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz Stewart
Multiple media appearances and reliable sourcing. Clearly passes io. She's a celebrity, this is not a vanity page. It's becoming pretty obvious there's some time-wasting -making going on in this recent outbreak of AfDs. Sources on pornographic subject are being labled 'unreliable' because they deal in pornography. Does this law apply to other fields as well? Articles on a historical figure are 'unreliable' if they appear in a historical journal
— User:Dekkappai, 18:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:B||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Bots)