Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Piper (2nd nomination)
probably should be '''speedy keep'''). My https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adrian_Piper rationale for keep in the first AfD still very much applies. Ms. Piper is a public figure and cannot reasonably expect to have no article on Wikipedia, barring issues with copyright or  concerns. Are there any such issues with the current article? Is it written in an inappropriate way? Are there too few sources? Simply put, Adrian Piper passes ,  and any other notability requirement. Anything else is an editing issue, not suitable for AfD
— User:Freshacconci, 17:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)