Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulong Buhangin, Santa Maria
SJ does have a point, and as I think about my reasoning a second time, I am inclined to remember something someone wrote to me once when I asked about geographic features... she said that, in her experience, virtually every geographic feature is "notable enough". Well, when you can have non-towns and barely-populated areas such as Moolack Beach with a page, why couldn't a sub-municipality as well? I'm not sold on the local government unit having free reign in some sort of "inherent notability" paradigm, but I can see where this has a notability simply for being a populated, geographically-identifiable place. Hence the vote change. I stand by the ''comments'' above, though, and feel that  could be used to argue in both directions on this one and thus it is not an adequate argument for either. Status Quo is always to err on the side of keep, should no consensus or borderline policy be met
— User:VigilancePrime, 07:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)