Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mototaka Nakamura
A few days ago I tried looking for more sources indicating notability and to find better independent coverage (including expert criticism and mentions in wide mainstream papers).  I mostly fell on advocacy org sites and blogs, including Friends of Science's (that has a misleading name BTW) and self-published pamphlets like the one I removed Special:Diff/948266459|here (despite it being a Google books link, it's not a book).  I'm also not convinced that  is met.  When good expert sources evaluating fringe claims are rare (and we need them to cover the topic) it's usually a sign of  and Wikipedia is not the place to popularize things
— User:PaleoNeonate, 01:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)