Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Judaism (2nd nomination)
into Reactions to Judaism or something similar.  I appreciate the arguments made by Dustformswords et al, and I agree that this topic is notable.  Furthermore, while this article clearly needs some work, I do not believe it would be beneficial to simply remove all this content by deleting the article.  ''However'' this article's title (and thus subject) ''necessarily'' restricts it to a point of view that is critical of Judaism.  '''I cannot see how an article that ''necessarily'' violates the |neutral point of view policy should be retained in that form.'''  If there were an article called Reactions to Judaism, and the criticisms section became so long that a fork called Criticism of Judaism grew organically out of it, I would definitely WP:!vote|!vote keep, but as far as I can tell, this is not a content fork of any article.  Most of the article that Special:WhatLinksHere/Criticism_of_Judaism|link to it do so from the Template:Judaism|Series on Judaism template, so it appears to be existing in a vacuum.&nbsp
— User:Lear, 02:51, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)