Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedarsoft
but not because of the sales — notability has nothing to do with meeting some arbitrary income figure. It's entirely about the presence or absence of |reliable sources, but those are clearly lacking here. If an article's been around for four years, and we ''still'' can't actually figure out what individual ''city'' the company was based in (as opposed to describing and categorizing it solely by province), then there clearly aren't enough valid sources about the company to make it a keepable article
— User:Bearcat, 18:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)