Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pale Moon (web browser)
The rationale sounds like a  to me. I'm fine with Basilisk getting deleted or merged to this article, but to delete this one? Nope, not a chance. It's also interesting that this AfD comes right after someone posted a reddit post about Pale Moon devs "abusing" the Mozilla Public License
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SOFIXIT (Wikipedia:Be bold)