Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Election Selection Trauma (second nomination)
Wow, only in Florida. :) Clearly as an academic term it isn't worthy of an article since nobody in the academic community seems to take it seriously. Google scholar shows no relevant hits for the term.http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=+%22Post+Election+Selection+Trauma%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search Could it survive as a neologism?  is one of the strictist notability guidelines I've read, in fact it doesn't really describe any circumstances when an article on a neologism is appropriate. I'll admit that some neologisms may be worthy of articles, but with only 9000 google hits http://www.google.com/search?q=+%22Post+Election+Selection+Trauma%22+-site:wikipedia.org+-site:answers.com&hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&as_qdr=all I'd say its pretty clear this one doesn't
— User:GabrielF, 02:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)