Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Asian History (journal)
I think that the case for deletion has been clearly laid out. The case for keeping, despite the production of huge walls of text, misunderstanding of WP policies, wikilawyering, and general muddying of the waters is much more shaky, although I don't envy the poor admin who'll have to wade through all that stuff. Just one final remark (although I fear that it will cause another multi-paragraph diatribe): Yes, WP determines what constitutes a |reliable source and what is or is not "selective". Only if we judge that a source is reliable and establishes |notability do we use it to base an article upon
— User:Randykitty, 14:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)