Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Character Options (2nd nomination)
No indications of notability - entirely promotional article. Fails , topic fails GNG and , references fails  and/or . Notability is not inherited - that is, just because some of the products this company manufactured may be for notably characters from movies, etc, this does not mean that the notability of those characters bestows notability on the manufacturer. Also, there appears to be some misinterpretation of "independent of the subject" - this does not mean that the publisher of a reference must be an independent corporate entity from the company. Routine listings in Bloomberg and the Companies Office fail , references such as http://kidscreen.com/2016/08/10/scooby-doo-hits-center-stage-in-the-uk/ this one from kidscreen.com provide no information on the company and are mere mentions-in-passing, thereby also fails CORPDEPTH, references such as http://www.toynews-online.biz/news/read/character-options-named-pok-mon-master-toy-distributor-for-uk-and-ireland/049219 this one are based on company announcements with no independent analysis or opinion and fails  and/or 
— User:HighKing, 18:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPIP||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)