Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Flynn (politician)
draftify''' also acceptable.) Being a state political party chair is not an automatic notability freebie that guarantees an article just because the person existed — and while I can't actually see any of the sources being cited, because the links all lead to a login wall rather than the actual content being cited, their ''headlines'' do ''not'' suggest that Flynn was the ''subject'' of enough of them (as opposed to being namechecked or quoted in coverage of other things or people) to give him the benefit of the doubt on whether he clears  or not.This was also, for the record, recreated shortly ''after'' another user approached me, even though I ''wasn't'' the nominator the first time and thus there was no real reason for me to be the approachee, to play the  game because two other past chairs of the Wisconsin Democratic Party had articles without being well-sourced — which backfired, as OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments routinely do, as both articles promptly got nominated for deletion too: one got kept because it was able to be sourced much better than it was or this is, while the other got deleted. And I remain convinced that the ''real'' reason that people are so determined to create an article about him is ''not'' his past role as a state political party chair, but the desire to create a campaign brochure for his ''current'' campaign in the gubernatorial primary (which is not in and of itself a reason why a person gets an article on here either.)So, as always, no prejudice against recreation if somebody can do ''better'' than this and/or he wins the gubernatorial election next year — but the article claims nothing about him that would get him an automatic inclusion freebie now, and the sourcing still isn't where it would need to be to get him past 
— User:Bearcat, 20:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)