Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Martine Vik Magnussen case
I agree with others that although the article passes Wikipedia:Notability, it also fails . So here's why I think it presently it should be kept - because if we delete it, it will only presently be added back by another Anon. Secondly, the longer term issues of extradition between the UK and Yemen, let alone the diplomatic pressure Norway will bring to bear, would easily push this past a News point to an issue of excellent encyclopaedic note. In example, I'd say look at the Alexander Litvinenko article - initially news of one person dying, now an ongoing diplomatic issue clearly worthy of encyclopaedic inclusion. Let the Anon's edit and add as the news piece ebbs and flows, and review in a months time once its significance (in light of the police report) has been established or not. Rgds
— User:Trident13, 16:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)