Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhoda McGaw Theatre
Per AleatoryPonderings and other sources found. '''Please note'''; that a week rationale for keep may grant a reprisal for now,  but a relisting, because the Nom was valid, could result in a different outcome. It is policy that information be |verified and that |primary sources do not advance notability. When notability is contested it become the |burden of those wishing inclusion to provide proof according to our policies and guidelines.  "Keep" gestures (wannabe !votes) will not usually suffice in many debates. If a venue is important it will likely have achieved notice and thereby sources. "All of the above" can be seen as |"keep because everyone else likes it", and sourcing through the "xternal links|external links section (certainly "not currently well-referenced" -- or at all) is rarely indicative of notability. I found some sources to validate some of the unsourced content and will see if there are more later. https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/fancy-working-new-victoria-theatre-13410088 The Ambassador Theatre Group, which includes the New Victoria Theatre , the Rhoda McGaw Theatre and the six-screen cinema in Woking
— User:Otr500, 07:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:PRIMARY||WP:BURDEN||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:E (Wikipedia:Verifiability)