Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 FC Winterthur season
Change of !vote, see comments below". (|ATD, draftify) : Fails , hat Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not, and erifiability. Article problems are likely insurmountable. Wikipedia:Verifiability#Notability|Notability: {{tq|If no eliable sources|reliable, ndependent sources|independent sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it (i.e., the topic is not otability|notable).}} The catch-22 of not wanting to add prose (and apparently sourcing) to an article that may be deleted (we call a ey|Hey) is that currently the article fits the definition of 1)- OTSTATS|"Excessive listings of unexplained statistics", basically a list-class article. If we have a list-class statistic article there should be a main article with ''"explanatory text providing context"''. When this is lacking the article fails  miserably: {{tq|Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players. Wikipedia is not a stats directory. It is strongly recommended that such articles be redirected to the team page if no sourced prose can be created.}} When notability is |challenged an unsourced article, apparently improperly using sourcing from the "External links" section that includes the names of living people, runs afoul of |BLP: {{tq|This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP, whether or not that person is the subject of the article, ''and to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages'', including talk pages
— User:Otr500, 03:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:NSEASON||WP:W||WP:V||WP:R||WP:I||WP:N||WP:H||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:CHALLENGE||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)