Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa May (actress)
Something like this does not escape  territory just because the ''same'' coverage context pops back up a second or third or fourth time — no matter how many more times she gets another brief blip of coverage because she happens to have virtually the same name as the Prime Minister, she still does not cross from BLP1E territory into "satisfies a notability criterion" until you can show sources ''besides'' the name-twin blips. If you want to get her over  for "Smack My Bitch Up", or over  for appearing in nudie mags, then you can't do it just by referencing those things to sources which are mentioning those facts by way of ''background'' in coverage that she's getting ''because'' name-twin; you need to show that she got some media coverage ''because'' "Smack My Bitch Up" or ''because'' nudie mags '''at the time those things were happening'''. If there were just three or four sources being shown here which were covering her '''without mentioning the PM at all''', then I'd be happy to vote keep — but as long as the sourcing is dated ''entirely'' to 2016/17, and exists fundamentally ''because'' of the name coincidence rather than because her ''work'' is making her notable at all, then yes, she ''is'' still a BLP1E ''regardless'' of how many times the same 1E keeps bobbing back up above the surface of the "insignificant news of the weird" cycle
— User:Bearcat, 15:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:NACTOR||WP:NMODEL (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)