Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Swiss incursion into Liechtenstein
I feel I must comment on the recent votes for deletion of this article.  NMChico24, does every Mexican migrant who crosses the border wind up on every major news station and newspaper in the United States?  Hut 8.5, why doesn't it merit an article?  It's a widely published incident, please give a reason.  Agnetha1234, "substance" is irrelevant.  This is why we have stubs, an article should not be deleted for being short, so long as what's contained within is proven to be notable and is sourced.  YechielMan, how does this "ten-year test" pertain to Wikipedia guidelines?  I never read it in a policy before.  Further, an incident passing notability guidelines at one point in time passes notability guidelines always (ignoring changes in the guidelines themselves).  Just because people stop talking about something doesn't mean it should be removed from Wikipedia.  And yes, this incident was only widely publicied for its amusement value, but  doesn't care ''why'' something is notable, only that it is.  No one here has yet to contest that this incident received substantial coverage in English language media, so barring that, someone please explain to me ''per Wikipedia policy/guidelines'' why this should be deleted.  I appologize if that seemed a bit rash, I'm just befuddled here. User:Someguy1221|Someguy1221
— NONE, 22:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)