Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LOLCat Bible Translation Project (2nd nomination)
The article already has legitimate |sources, and the editorial linked by Umbralcorax above could be added as a source too. I believe the nominator has misunderstood Wikipedia:Stub, the guideline for stubs; being a stub is not a reason to delete an article. I also don't know what the nominator means by saying that the "chronicle" link is unaccessible; there's no mention of anything called the Chronicle in this article or its cites. Nor are there any inappropriately duplicated links in the references
— User:Metropolitan90, 04:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)