Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A2Command
All I'm seeing here is a blizzard of verbiage from the Keep proponents concerning anything and everything but providing |reliable, independent, third-party, '''published''' sources describing the subject |in "significant detail".  That's the bottom line.  Fulfill that fundamental requirement, and the article passes.  Fail to do so, and it must be deleted.  The Keep proponents are making a common error among newcomers in believing that when we use the word "notable," it means "I think it's important."  Rather, "notable" in the context of AfDs means "Considered to meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability."  In the case of this article, that means passing  AND .  The number of page views a website allegedly gets is irrelevant.  The number of Twitter feeds supposedly generated is irrelevant.  The article creator's unproven assertion that the "target community" believes the subject to be notable is irrelevant
— User:Ravenswing, 17:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)