Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Videosmarts (2nd nomination)
Thibbs' assertion that this is a "historically important example" etc is interesting and all, but it remains the assertion of an editor, as opposed to one made by multiple reliable sources.  He is not the first, of course, to advocate the curious notion that subjects lacking adequate sourcing should receive free passes nonetheless because of their "relevance" or "importance."  Unfortunately for the premise,  remains the fundamental core policy of this encyclopedia.  The response to a lack of reliable sources is not to wave off ; it is, in the blunt phrasing of , "If a topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it
— User:Ravenswing, 02:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:V||WP:IRS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)