Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederic P. Reichey
While RAN is correct that  doesn't ''preclude'' local coverage from being ''included'' in the notability pool, we ''do'' have a consensus that if a person fails all of our SNGs, and so you're shooting for "still notable just because media coverage exists" instead, then that media coverage ''does'' have to extend beyond the ''purely'' local and routine. For similar examples, an actress who has had only local stage roles with the local youth theatre company, but has never had a film or television role that might actually get her over , does not clear GNG just because she's been profiled in the local newspaper; the owner of a local non-chain restaurant does not clear GNG just because the local newspaper's food critic wrote a restaurant review; and smalltown mayors do not clear GNG just because their death resulted in an obituary in their local newspaper just as could be simply ''expected'' for ''any'' mayor of ''anywhere''. If a person;s notability claim passes an SNG as a topic of legitimately broad interest, then we don't care how local or non-local the sourcing is (a state legislator doesn't have to get nationalized coverage to qualify for an article, for example) — but if you're going for "doesn't pass any SNG but is still notable under GNG just because press coverage exists", then you ''do'' have to show significantly ''more'' press coverage than other equivalent people at the same level of significance could also show. But nothing here passes NPOL, and none of the coverage suggests a reason why he could be considered more notable than the norm for an otherwise non-notable role
— User:Bearcat, 17:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR (Wikipedia:Notability)