Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain-disabling psychiatric medical treatment
I don't think any of us arguing for deletion would dispute that there is notable material related to what is on the page. But I would also urge care with respect to arguments based on . Likewise, we should consider the last paragraph of : the fact of notability does not trump  and other policies and guidelines (here, particularly,  and ). Anything to be kept or merged really ''must'' satisfy  as well as eschew anything that misleads readers medically. The question is whether, if the page were to be deleted, anything would be lost with respect to creating proper content from scratch. In that regard, please let me suggest that those editors arguing for some sort of keep specify what, on the page, you would retain on a kept and renamed page. If there is a compelling argument for keeping a significant portion of the content, then that might change my mind, but if there isn't, it would be advisable to create better material from scratch
— User:Tryptofish, 23:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GHITS||WP:JNN||WP:NOT||WP:FRINGE||WP:MEDRS||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)