Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweat Cosmetics
There's no way, if  was met, that ''13 sources'' should effectively get us "they make cosmetics," but that's really what we have.  There's obvious COATRACKing - ''Her Campus'', with a profile on a founder, and all that comes out of it is that the products are hypoallergenic?  Clearly the source wasn't about the product, then, was it?  Several of the other references are "X number of X"-type articles, and those are never any good as sources.  The fact that it's sold at Sephora?  So is a lot of other stuff.  Some famous people started it?  . I'm not seeing anything that tells me this is anything other than ordinary.  The coverage is pretty typical product launch coverage because a famous person is involved, and said coverage is over a span of only two months, and ''at best'' it's , and I'm not so sure it's got coverage outside of the news cycle.  This is an SPA-created article on a company that simply doesn't meet notability guidelines
— User:MSJapan, 17:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)