Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocom
I think the analysis by SwisterTwister is convincing. The vast majority of the sources are redressed PR and do not satisfy  (''any material written or published by the organization, directly or indirectly'') and hence cannot be used towards . It is also worth looking at the fact that the coverage is almost entirely local. The only somewhat OK source I found is LA Times, but that quotes the people affiliated with the organisation extensively and it not enough for 
— User:Lemongirl942, 05:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPIND||WP:NORG||WP:NORG (Wikipedia:Notability)