Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-Newtonian calculus
the Talk page comments also appear here http://non-newtoniancalculus.books.officelive.com/sitemap.aspx. The Talk page comments make clear the  issue, as '''smithpith''' who created and has primarily edited the article is identified as Michael Grossman. I have "The Rainbow of Math." to hand. On pg. 332 is a footnote mentioning Grossman and Katz 1972 as having developed on a 1754 comment by Besicovitch. But pg. 774 is in the Bibliography and is just the actual citation for Grossman and Katz 1972. This is only one reference to Grossman and Katz in a footnote plus its Bib. entry. The terms "non-Newtonian" and "bigeometric" do not appear in the footnote; the former is in the book title in the Bib. I still feel this is one person pushing his somewhat -y theory (correct, I'm sure, but far off the mainstream). Which of the Grossman books is from a reputable, non-vanity press? I don't think policy is that every technical term used in a journal or book merits a page
— User:JJL, 15:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)