Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Fox News – White House controversy
The article seems to fail to demonstrate why this particular incident is notable and so I agree with Thryduulf's comments. I fear some may expecting that this issue might become something more significant but such speculation isn't appropriate.  is relevant; "not all events warrant an encyclopedia article of their own". The length of the article seems to support the suggestion that an article here is not necessary and that this event could be adequately dealt with in other articles. It note the comments that this article satisfies  that has been given as a reason for keeping this article but I'd suggest we can't simply say that any topic which has "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" automatically needs an article, not least where it is probably true to say that any trivial incident concerning the White House is likely to result in dozens of news articles
— User:Adambro, 13:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)