Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magibon (3rd nomination)
I would rather see the person's personal information kept that way (as personal) than the article kept and be open to attack vandals or others willing to defame a living person (see ). Unless someone is willing to |rollback all edits going back to sometime around June or |request for oversight, I have to side for deletion. The fact is that the personal information will still be present in the article's history unless rollback, oversight, or article deletion occurs - that is something page protection cannot accomplish in this case. Nothing against the article, it notability or lack thereof, etc.; but protecting the actual person is more important than keeping the article
— User:MuZemike, 16:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:ROLLBACK||WP:OVER (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)