Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1660 Safed massacre
Based on the sources cited, it is (if you will pardon the expression) just another pogrom, to which no one dedicates more than a sentence or two, except for one discredited source and another that did the discrediting. Given the lack of a detailed study (except for one that concludes in the negative), it is hard to put any faith in the claims that it even happened, or at least that it happened as described. As per Carwil and Roscelese, this fails . We shouldn't have an article created by pasting together a set of passing references.  This would be fine as an entry in a list of possible pogroms, but not a whole article all to itself. Again, there are citations but they are window-dressing not detailed study and hence they don't prove notability, not at all
— User:Agricolae, 01:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)