Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn School
or smerge) (in)to Nolambur per longstanding precedent for schools not kept at AfDs – Upon reading through the closure of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&oldid=767023947#RfC_on_secondary_school_notability the February RFCI have found that the closure is confusing and inconclusive, ''but'' from my understanding the result was 'no consensus, defaulting to status quo. However—rather surprisingly, in fact—I have found ''not a single'' |reliable source that is |independent of the subject. If some editor can find some, I will change my !vote to ''weak keep'' (second choice, per this being in a third-world area with limited news coverage) per the outcome of the RfC. Also, {{tq|Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist}} was the status quo back then; existence has to be verified by a reliable secondary source independent of the subject. I believe though, that the correct interpretation would of been reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Now though, school AfDs have become much further scrutinised because of the RfC, and I feel that is a slightly negative aspect. I cannot find any mentions of the school, which is probably because the school was made only in 2008. As a further note, |promotional language is a content issue and ought to be discussed at the article's talk page, not here
— User:J947, 20:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)