Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Creation Society (2nd nomination)
I just looked at the references in the article and mentioned above. To my mind, it is very clear that there are no intellectually independent references cited and therefore none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. For example, https://books.google.ie/books?id=LFi2CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA35&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false ''For the Love of Language'' mentions the organization but uses the organization's own description (in quotes) and says very little else - fails . Or https://newrepublic.com/article/122961/fantastical-rise-invented-languages this reference from newrepublic.com mentions the LCS but it is merely a name-check ''They know Na’vi from Avatar but it’s unlikely they have heard of Moten, a language created by Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets, the president of the Language Creation Society'' and this is insufficient for meeting the criteria for establishing notabilty and fails . I could go on, but hopefully you get the point
— User:HighKing, 20:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)