Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Schaack
I think the article about her in ''Nature'', the Fulbright scholarship, and her high citation record (#C1) add up to notability. But as the nominator said, "Getting an NSF grant and tenure does not qualify one to get a Wikipedia page" — the article was previously written in a way that emphasized those picayune details, rather than anything that made Schaack notable. I have rewritten it to be shorter but I hope also to make notability clearer. As for the h-index, I am more interested in the top end of the citations (her https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=02U6g_UAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao Google scholar profile shows five publications with over 100 citations each) than in how many lower-level ones she has
— User:David, 05:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)