Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Money Masters (2nd nomination)
I agree that notability is insufficiently proven to maintain the article. - it's not an issue of disagreeing with the content of the documentary, it's an issue of significant coverage in secondary sources, and I don't think the film meets that burden. Several of the editors supporting keeping the article (including those, as DCI said, seem to be clearly SPA/ips specifically targeting this discussion) argue that mere existence of the film justifies inclusion. Existence does not confer notability. And it is also clear that several of these supporting editors do not exactly have a NPOV on the subject. The admin who closes this discussion ought to take a good look into the sources actually cited in the article. Biased, fringe coverage shouldn't be held up to prove notability
— User:Ducknish, 22:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)