Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott G. Stewart
One modestly substantial piece in a newspaper (''USA Today'') isn't really enough to meet , and the  issues make it a clear delete in my view.  The lack of general coverage of Stewart means that the article ends up being dominated by the unproven allegations, which (as DGG noted) makes it function as an attack page. I assume that was not the intent of the article's creator(s), but it is the effect
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 18:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)