Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spigning
but not for the reasons above. It may ''not'' be |madeup but rather a term that's obscure to the rest of us and known to a small group of people, and although the software ''does'' exist, it almost certainly shouldn't be in this article. To me, this seems like an article that's a "puff piece" praising the software, and using phony celebrity endorsement to give the appearance that it's reliably sourced. I did look it up on Google, and although there's few Ghits for such a thing, this certainly doesn't seem like patent nonsense, it's just in an inappropriate place. Whether this was |written by an employee of the firm or a fan of the software (which doesn't matter anyhow), this article doesn't meet Wikipedia's criteria. Not speedy delete-worthy, but for now it should be deleted, or at least moved offsite. It doesn't appear to be a spam campaign, more of an attempt to try and get free publicity for something, but it fails. My vote: delete
— User:Denyanode16, 19:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MADEUP||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)