Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel González-Gay
As I indicate on the talk page, the "number" of papers seems meaningless per ... as someone disciplined in science/medicine (i.e., thanks to my father), I know that inflated paper counts can happen. Peer-reviewed journal article counts are just that: an objective measure of how often one publishes. Granted, the number is directly proportional to the credibility of the research, but at the same time, I am hesitant to say that articles ''by'' the man should be used to gauge notability per one of the six criteria at . Rather, articles ''about'' the man should be used... i.e., third party cites indicating why he is notable in his field, what his peers think of his work, how significant they perceive it to be in the field of rheumatology, etc. Some sort of  rather than just the PubMed listing count
— User:Kinu, 06:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROFTEST||WP:PROFTEST||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)