Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Ireton
I'm not seeing significant coverage of the subject in secondary sources to pass  although I see lots of incidental news coverage. The difference between "historic first" and "that's nice, a novelty" is a matter of how much attention people pay to the matter. I personally think it's a good thing about America that a town's first openly gay mayor attracts more of the second variety of attention than the first, but that's neither here nor there. Since he doesn't pass  either, I don't think we'd lose anything by maintaining standards and deleting this article
— User:RayAYang, 19:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:POLITICIAN (Wikipedia:Notability)