Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of legislators who support SOPA or PIPA
Clearly  and I am sure that individual representative's support or opposition is verifiable in sufficient es.  In its current state the list/article looks a little "thrown together" and could use some polishing, but that's not a reason to delete it.  And of course, the content of the list is going to change over time, but that's no reason to delete anything either.  And the fact that changes will occur does not mean that the list is indiscriminate, it just means it's incomplete.   would actually seem to argue ''for'' this article's inclusion, as the article is a "collection of information... gathered where care and/or distinctions about the information contained in the collection are made--in a thoughtful manner"  It will evolve, as will every article here, but there's no valid, policy based reason to delete it, IMO.  Arguments citing  or  seem, to me, to be arguing the corollary of —if other bills don't have lists of pro/opponents, this bill shouldn't either.  But just because it doesn't exist, doesn't mean it shouldn't.  It just means that nobody has gotten around to creating it yet. :) Finally, merging it back into the articles on the bills themselves, would make those articles unmanageably long.  This is exactly the kind of situation where such data ''should'' be forked off to a stand-alone list article
— User:Livitup, 19:04, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:POV||WP:UNDUE||WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Notability)