Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micro-urban
because it doesn't really matter who coined the phrase first - for it to be considered notable enough for inclusion here, it needs to have been the subject of |significant coverage in multiple |reliable sources and I don't think it has yet. My other concern is that the article is entirely US-centric and this isn't Ameripedia. There are probably a dozen places in the UK that could be described as being "micro-urban" and dozens more in Europe. I can think of at least half-a-dozen in Australia that would meet the criteria. And that's kind of the point - if this were a term in widespread use, it would have been used in relation to a great many more places. At the moment, we don't even have reliable sources describing those places listed in the article as "mirco-urban". That list is simply |OR - based on someone's interpretation of the criteria and how it might apply. Most telling of all is the line from the people who claim to have coined the term
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)