Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Kelly (Freeholder) (2nd nomination)
I agree that Wikipedia is non-static. The problem is that the changes that you have claimed at  between your previously rejected AfD and now just don't exist. I expect that you can provide clear examples of the policy changes to  between the time that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Kelly (Freeholder)|your previous failed AfD was rejected and your current attempt at undermining consensus. Please read the previous AfD and tell me that you can honestly believe that the previous AfD was not on the merits of the article. We have made Wikipedia policy and we reached consensus, one article at a time, and it has been reached for this one. You just stubbornly refuse to acknowledge that, even after having only been able to get only one, lone individual to agree with you. How big does the margin have to be to get you to accept consensus? You are following  to the letter. If everyone followed your lead, all we would have is anarchy
— User:Alansohn, 03:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Notability)