Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult-child sex (2nd nomination)
Now, I don't know about the content of this particular article, but the argument that the article is a POV-fork doesn't seem to me to be quite right. Redirecting this article to child sexual abuse seems particularly weird when, historically and anthropologically, adult-child sex was considered the norm in many cultures other than our own. Granted, in today's world and in our global culture, there's almost no place adult-child sex is legitimately practiced, but it is quite presumptuous of us to say that adult-child sex is always child sexual abuse. I mean, was Plato sexually abusing his pupils? Is that even a legitimate question to ask? This is clearly a topic that an encyclopedic exposition can be written about from a |neutral and non-inflammatory perspective. Certainly child sexual abuse will be mentioned, but there are plenty of reasons to think that there will be more to this subject than simply child sexual abuse
— User:ScienceApologist, 02:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)