Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Clit
As I said, I'm not opposed to a carefully considered redirect. If you merge whatever is needed from this article to the Bowfly article then a redirect is fine but as it stands now it doesn't meet the required standard regarding sourcing. As a consequence of that, it also fails the notability guideline discussed above as well as  which is non-negotiable, regardless of whether the article contains negative information or not. You need significant independent coverage by |reliable sources. You can't cite Wikipedia in a wikipedia article or use blogs, websites of record labels, reprints of press releases, Youtube etc. I'm just not seeing the required coverage to support an independent article. I'm also not entirely sure that you understand the consequences of having an article here with your pictures in it under the name "Miss Clit". Anyone can edit here and although Wikipedia is not censored (nor do I believe that it ever should be) you should consider if this is really what you want to do
— User:Vyvyan, 07:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)