Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Erick Lozada
on the merits. The sources indicated either don't refer to the subject at all or confirm facts about the subject - he is a blogger, for example - but none of them actually offer the kind of coverage we require to show notability. There are no sources offered, nor can I find any, that actually talk about the subject himself. This may be a case where the |Usual Caveats apply, as the subject seems to be early in his career; if he publishes notable work, or if he finds himself covered in reliable sources as required by , then an article may become appropriate. But not yet
— User:Ultraexactzz, 13:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:USUAL||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Usual caveats)