Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bratunac massacre
I would like to remind everyone of the basic policy of |verifiability.  Any personal opinions we might have of whether the accounts of this massacre are credible are irrelevant, if there are authoritative, verifiable references that report it.  This policy is intended to short-circuit endless, circular arguments over "truth".  Did Armenian massacre|Turks massacre a million Armenians in 1916?  In some circles reports of this massacre are extremely controversial.  We don't let those who claim it didn't happen suppress coverage because they challenge the credibility of those reports.  I suggest the commemoration described in the B-92 report is worth covering, even if only one ethnic group found the account credible.  Some contributors here have complained that there were other massacres alleged to have occurred in the Yugoslav wars that are better documented.  So what?  Shouldn't we cover every massacre for which there are verifiable sources?  That massacres exist with better references is not an argument for deleting this article -- it is an argument for covering the other massacres as well
— User:Geo, 05:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:VER (Wikipedia:Verifiability)