Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Kade
Fails the test of substantial coverage in impartial, reliable sources. Notable sources are not necessarily |reliable sources; and his mentions in Gawker in particular seem to owe a lot to their attitude toward Philadelphia vs. NYC. He clearly wants to be notable; that doesn't make it so. The one solid mention in one solid magazine is simply not sufficient to pass the test
— User:Orangemike, 14:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)