Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankit Love (2nd nomination)
I am the original nominator. Yes, there are many articles in which Love is the featured subject or mentioned in - far more of the latter than the former - but all those articles comprise ''normal coverage'' of an election campaign. To illustrate, there are a great many articles in which the election's other independent candidate, Prince Zylinski, is mentioned yet we do not have an article on Zylinksi because he, like Love, has not received ''significant coverage'' as an individual required to fulfil the |basic general notability guideline regardless of the number of promotional media appearances available to source. In the absolute best case scenario, if we were to somehow conclude that Love is notable (which simply isn't going to happen given that the seven of us prior to your arrival had reached a |snow delete consensus and that you've demonstrated repeatedly an inabilty to |maintain a neutral point of view), he still wouldn't merit an article as he would |only be notable for one event. He should simply be mentioned in the candidates section of London mayoral election, 2016 as he already is. I have sincerely seen zero argument for otherwise
— User:N4, 21:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SNOW||WP:NPOV||WP:1E (Wikipedia:Notability)