Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naturalistic pantheism
that seems to be a lot of  material; plenty for inclusion.  It's also unclear under which policy you're suggesting deletion?  The article doesn't seem to be 'promoting' anything and by your logic of not including anything 'without any other backing but a single person's preference and his organization', I supposed we'd have to remove all articles about Calvinism too, as that's just 'one persons preferences'.  If the phrase in question here has other, older uses, then they should be |sourced and included in the article
— User:Dp76764, 18:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)