Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Saturday Comes Sunday (2nd nomination)
It's a term that appears to have some history to it and there do appear to be several reliable secondary sources to justify a notability claim. It's evidently not a . No point in rehashing the previous AfD, which was procedurally problematic (and the ghits argument is not in itself a good one). The religion of the people writing the sources is not of much consequence so long as it's published in a reliable source (and/or that person is a reliable source). If you feel the article is imbalanced because of it, then fix it, but that's not a reason to delete. --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 18:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)