Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waipoua Forest Trust
Which of the sources you've added do you claim discuss the ''subject'' in "significant detail" and are |reliable sources, as the GNG requires?  Having just gone through them all, I don't see it.  Newsletters don't count, seminar reports don't count, the Trust's own website doesn't count, casual mentions don't count, unrelated quotes by the Trust's officials don't count.  That the Waipoua Forest is notable no one would dispute; that this Trust is, I do
— User:Ravenswing, 22:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)