Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rape jihad (5th nomination)
this article is a huge pile of |original research propping up a neologism. This is the basic pattern: some article somewhere uses the term "rape jihad" to describe a case of an Islamist organisation or a group of Muslims sexually abusing people. This is used as an excuse to stick in a paragraph of text about that sexual abuse, usually copied from some other article about it and citing references which don't talk about "rape jihad" at all (in the case of the Darfur section the copyist hasn't even bothered to copy across the citations referred to in the footnotes). This is all linked up to conclude that these are all instances of some wider phenomenon called "rape jihad". Very few of the sources cited draw that conclusion, and the ones that do are of very low quality (the main ones are http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=11278 this which is a FrontPage Magazine|very unreliable source, and http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/391814/isis-and-rape-jihad-andrew-c-mccarthy this, an |opinion piece). Since the last AfD two paragraphs about the general history of rape in warfare have also been shoved in, despite the fact that the sources don't seem to talk about "rape jihad" at all. I advise against a merge as there is very, very little content that could be used and isn't already present somewhere else and given the history of recreations salting may be a good idea
— User:Hut, 21:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NEWSORG (Wikipedia:No original research)