Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berkeley Partners for Parks
I believe this AFD is premature, raised less than 10 hours after article creation and less than 8 hours since it was de-speedied from a CSD A7 in preference for appropriate improvement tags which I added at the time. A quick glance at results in GBooks and GNews shows a high likelihood that sources can be improved in the near future and as per the |DEL guidance such searches should be taken into account rather than just the current sources included in a new article (which is what the nomination appears to be based on). The article creator has made some related articles quite successfully that were originally challenged and as they appear committed to improvement I would rather see these articles encouraged and discussed for improvement rather than challenging with deletion notices so shortly after creation. As for the partnership arrangements of the organization, there is some explanation on the sites linked already in the article and you can read some of these for yourself if you visit http://www.bpfp.org/index.php/bpfp-affiliate-groups/ bpfp.org, consequently it seems a trivial improvement to add a bit more explanation in the article about how this works and their associated impact and influence on wider issues such as taxation and legislation which is not only supported in independent news articles but in published books
— User:Fæ, 12:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)