Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Sucessora
A lack of sources in an article is '''''not''''' a valid reason to delete an article. (Unless you've searched and can find none, then it would be a valid reason to delete, but there's a ton of results coming back on Google so I find it hard to believe that there's absolutely none.) I'm finding sources, although it's somewhat slow going because there's a huge language barrier here. (Everything is in Spanish and I'm having to use Google translate due to my comprehension being at beginner level.) However, what I'm finding shows that this is indeed notable. It is a bestseller in Brazil, spawned an incredibly popular telenovela series, and even got some controversy because of the incredibly close similarities between A Sucessora and Daphne du Maurier's Rebecca. (A Sucessora was published earlier and the general consensus in Brazil seems to say that du Maurier plagiarized the work.) The article is slow going, but it does seem to pass  via it being the focus of a notable telenovela and being the focus of several news articles. (Most of them are from the 40s, but coverage is coverage.) Since it was published in the 1930s it's going to take some time to find all of the sources (some of which are undoubtedly lost to the sands of time or aren't on the internet) but this does appear to be notable. My school has a copy of the Auerbach book, so I'll check to see if I can verify that claim in the article
— User:Tokyogirl79, 06:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)