Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neda Agha-Soltan
Step one: Is Neda's life story notable, yes? or no? If yes, then move on to step two....T''here is no firm policy on the inclusion of obscure branches of popular culture subjects. ''... Well-referenced and well-written articles on obscure topics are from time to time deleted as well, but such deletions are controversial.'' It is also worth noting that many articles on relatively obscure topics are featured articles.''---''''''Step two: Would breaking the biography and the event into separate articles serve Wikipedia's purposes in this instance, yes or no? If yes, then keep.The key to avoiding information overload is to break an article down into more than one page...''. These can start out as section headings and be broken out into separate pages as the main article becomes too long. ''...''Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base of any and all information, full of railroad timetables and comprehensive lists. But ''any encyclopedic subject of interest should be covered, in whatever depth is possible.---'''META:Wiki is not paper#Organization|META:WIKI IS NOT PAPER#ORGANIZATION'''That is, to make sure our readers' eyes don't glaze over with coverage of peripheral detail extraneous to the precise topic being covered within an article, we break out extensive coverage being given some related matter or issue into separate articles, being sure to include only the pertinent details therefrom into that article's parent.Conclusion: Since I believe Neda is herself notable, along with the event of her shooting, and since I further believe that too exensive of  details about her shooting wouldn't optimally fit in her specific Wikipedia biography and that too extensive of details about her biography wouldn't optimally fit in an article about her shooting, I therefore believe that this article should be saved
— User:Justmeherenow, 19:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FAN (Wikipedia:Fancruft)