Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swagg Man
While I don't dispute that there is coverage of the subject in line with , I do think it's important to note that having reliable sources alone does not guarantee inclusion under , rather, it implies notibility but editors should use their judgement in determining whether the sources establish notability and how significant the coverage is.{{efn|"A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article" and "Moreover, not all coverage in reliable sources constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as reliable sources."}} |Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. Currently the article has no more information than a list of his tracks, where he currently lives, and that he has a tattoo on his head, and half the citations are to the artist's itunes listings. I don't speak French, but looking at the articles linked here (and as they are cited on the article page) using Google Translate, they seem to be rather minor news stories that simply talk about either his tracks or his head tattoo. I'm very dubious of the encyclopedic value of this article if the most interesting thing we have written about him is the tattoo he has on his head. We aren't a paper encyclopedia so we ''can'' have a page for every artist who has released a track and been interviewed a couple times, but should we? I do not believe that the sources available at this time give enough information about the subject to warrant an encyclopedia entry
— User:Wugapodes, 22:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:VERIFY||WP:GNG||WP:IINFO (Wikipedia:Verifiability)