Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viewers Like You (2nd nomination)
First: normal practice when entering a  discussion is to avoid snarky condescension about other people's grammatical and usage errors.  Secondly: The original nomination was made through Twinkle. Twinkle, as mentioned above, did something aberrant to my nomination, which included removing my original rationale. Apparently, the process was truncated somewhere along the line, for reasons beyond my control. Your insistence on a small point of process doesn't make the nomination any less valid ("''if it's properly nominated''...") and your verbal victory-dance, based on your "superior" knowledge and execution of this small point of process, comes off, at best, as pedantic and self-congratulatory
— User:Gladys, 23:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CIVIL (Wikipedia:Civility)