Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adzerk
The sources are thin and many of them do not count towards establishing notability per . For example, this http://observer.com/2013/03/reddit-adopts-new-ad-system-adzerk-allowing-users-to-up-and-downvote-ads/ observer source doesn't count towards notability per  as it is a brief mention in context of Reddit. Simply because Reddit is using their service doesn't make it notable. TechCrunch published literally every small news in the tech world, using it for notability would lead to Wikipedia becoming a directory (which goes against ). The quality of the sources is pretty bad. I mean this https://techcrunch.com/2013/05/30/how-adzerk-made-it-big-by-hitching-their-wagon-to-reddit/ TechCrunch article used an employee as a story source and this cannot establish notability per . None of the other sources are good enough and this seriously doesn't merit keeping
— User:Lemongirl942, 03:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:INHERITORG||WP:NOTDIR||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)