Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downsizing masculinity
All the comments above of the form "''Delete per WP:OR''" all fail  which states "''While this gives editors a clue as to what your reason is, it does not explain any specifics. This does not actually tell us whether the policy is being violated or not. This can be avoided by quoting the specific parts of policy that an article needs to meet, and why you think it succeeds/fails to meet them. Also, keep in mind that articles can often be improved, and may not need to be deleted at all, if the specific problems can be identified and corrected.''".  The original nomination was for notability which was an obvious nonsense as the article already cited 3 good sources and there are many more available.  No-one who has subsequently switched to another reason such as OR has provided any evidence or justification as to why they think the policy/guideline is being violated and why the article cannot be improved to address this.  This won't do.  If you want to justify the extreme measure of deleting such a substantial article then you have to do a little work like reading the article, checking out its sources and then forming a cogent argument based upon them.  A vague wave at a policy is not enough
— User:Colonel, 14:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:VAGUEWAVE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)