Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mototaka Nakamura
Citations are only moderate in a high citation field, and I don't see other signs of notability.  I'm concerned at how the article uses his past affiliations to give him a veneer of respectability (if he has a current academic post, I can't find it).  A single book (self-publisher even?) isn't likely to give , and the coverage mostly consists of the review by Tony Thomas and various rehashes
— User:Russ, 08:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NAUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)