Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of questionable diagnostic tests
there is a concern with running afoul of  and / here, but that's not a reason to delete. I would much rather prefer that we cite secondary or tertiary sources calling the group of these tests questionable. Whether you agree with QuackWatch or not, I think we can all agree that it has an obvious POV and fails . All of this logic applies to List of questionable diseases as well, which looks to be in similar shape
— User:Shoy, 18:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:MEDRS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)