Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur (4th nomination)
Let's take Link's |three sources, which I believe demonstrate an important distinction: |significant coverage is whether we have enough quality material to write an article that does the topic justice without regressing to primary sources or original research; significant coverage is not simply invoking the topic's name in |the headline. These three sources are about Bulbasaur but say nothing—they offer no original analysis for us to cite in any depth
— NONE, NONE
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:THREE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:HEADLINE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)