Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Lee lane closure controversy
There's nothing yet actually tying this scandal to Mr Christie except that it involved his staff.  As the people I the other discussion said, including a long section in his article gives undue weight to something in his life he may have been tangentially involved in.  I guess if it had to be related to someone prominent it would be him, but that's not a very good reason for it to be in his article.  Also, even if it turns out he was centrally involved, it would still be weird for Mr Christie's article to focus extensively on minor details of this one scandal (per ).  So I think it should stay here unless and until it turns out later it needs to be deleted outright
— User:Agnosticaphid, 06:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SUMMARY (Wikipedia:Summary style)