Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Creation Society (2nd nomination)
somewhat reluctantly as I am (personally and professionally) interested in human languages, constructed or otherwise. The society just doesn't have significant coverage in reliable independent sources; I won't repeat the arguments already made above re &nbsp;or trivial mentions versus deep coverage, but they are of course relevant. Sorry, but neither  nor  is met here
— User:Bonadea, 14:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)