Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identity tourism
per : I agree that the writing style is confusing (although "vague waffle" is unfortunately common in social science topics, even in published academic work). But there are a lot of published sources used in the article, and "talking about other people's work" is what Wikipedia articles are supposed to be. (See .) ARTN says that writing style doesn't impact notability -- if this is a notable subject, then it should be kept and improved. I think that the sources given in the article demonstrate notability
— User:Toughpigs, 17:56, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ARTN||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)