Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeMagic
I removed the disclaimer that it's not advertising from the page, as it appeared to be a pre-emptive AfD comment, and instead I'm posting it here.  While it was in the original edit, I felt that it violated the general practice of not posting content disclaimers.  If it is truely not advertising, then it's |Neutrality should be apparent from the article itself.  The disclaimer read (for information purposes) as follows: "There are pages for the Bedazzler and Magic Bullet appliance with the same general information and they are not deleted. This is an article that provides information on the product. It is not a form of advertising"  To me this is an AfD comment made before the fact, and not appropriate for a mainspace article, as they attempt to cite comparisons in the introduction to the article itself
— User:Wintermut3, 02:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)