Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics
The framing of the topic is inherently negative, contrary to |core policy.  If an issue about this event is significant then it should be in the main article.  If the main article is too full then topics should be split off in a neutral way.  So, for example, the G4S matter is best covered in a neutral article about security arrangements for these games and we actually have one &mdash; Security for the 2012 Summer Olympics.  We should not cover the matter in a ''controversies'' article too because that will, by its nature, bring together other unrelated sub-topics that have been cherry-picked because they have some negative or sensationalist spin.  Note also that we don't ever seem to get counter-balancing articles with a positive spin - articles which cherry-pick praise, success and things which went right.   This further demonstrates the lack of balance and neutrality
— User:Colonel, 07:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)