Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trimble Community Forest
It meets the |general notability guidelines as there is significant coverage in reliable sources. These two sources (http://www.athensnews.com/ohio/article-18326-township-trustees-to-be-asked-to-consider-trimble-wildlife-land-proposal-on-thursday.html,http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/woub/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=1229834) and the others available and cited in the article represent significant coverage in my opinion. They are ''about'' the subject, rather than simply mentioning it. Of course I might require a large number of non-local sources if I were judging the notability of, for example, Acme Web Marketing Company, but an article on a 1200 acre community forest goes towards fulfilling Wikipedia's function as a |geographical directory. For this reason, as long the forest can be verified to exist, and there are sources that provide coverage ''about'' the subject, the article should be retained
— User:Pontificalibus, 16:04, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:FIVE (Wikipedia:Notability)