Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower of Life (2nd nomination)
with cleanup which has been somewhat done.  This article is good information from RSes, though it has been said that it needs more secondary sources.  People have commented here, linking to the important core policies of Wikipedia which describe the criteria of encyclopedic content as is provided by secondary sources.  Thanks for doing that, and for having already cleaned it up.  This content is good and plentiful and well established, the subject is important and popular, and it needs to be preserved somewhere even if it was merged like with a biography of Drunvalo Melchizedek.   and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism optimistic eventualism in this case.  Deletionism sucks; deletion is not an answer to fixable issues, and AfD is not a valid (even if sometimes coincidental) basic method of attempting to explore or establish them. The talk page is. Thanks
— User:Smuckola, 05:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NORUSH (Wikipedia:There is no deadline)