Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battoni
Fails |verifiability since the only reference is to a website which is a mirror of this same Wikipedia article. Geographic places, even if they are no longer inhabited, even if their maximum population at any time was 50 (like this one), have been kept in AFDs as long as there is at least one rock solid reliable reference, such as the US Census, the 1911 Britannica, or some other governmental or scholarly reference to verify its existence.  The nominator, CastAStone, states that areas within a municipality are not necessarily notable, and I agree. Such a neighborhood may be |notable on the basis of substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. Examples of such are TriBeCa as mentioned by CastAStone, DUMBO, Brooklyn, Whitechapel, Haight-Ashbury, San Francisco, California, Chicago Loop and  countless other notable areas within a larger municipality. The burden is presumably much lower if the hamlet stands by itself in a county, province, or region and is a census reporting locality, is in the Domesday Book or equivalent. If references satisfying  and  can be found for this hamlet by the end of the AFD period, then I might switch to "Keep
— User:Edison, 01:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:N||WP:V||WP:N (Wikipedia:Verifiability)