Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kabbage
I was the user that attempted to clean up the page from previous COI editors. One user in particular, "KabbageKate", seemed very likely to be directly related to the subject. The page was riddled with  issues that I tried to address. The page has been live for over four years, with dozens of editors contributing to the page. The proper route would be to improve the page rather than flat-out deleting it, as it so clearly passes otability with trusted independent sources such as The Washington Post, Forbes, New York Times, USA Today, and Bloomberg, see  and RV. As it relates to the press releases, it appears that there are only three out of over 45 sources total, which passes . This is something that can easily be corrected, rather than resorting to deleting the page. In regards to , sources have been added by a variety of editors, including myself, and I don't think it applies here; there has been  of this subject
— User:Walton2413, 15:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:N||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NRV||WP:SPIP||WP:BOMBARD||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)