Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of incidents famously considered great blunders (2 nomination)
Whether it is something we agree with or not, it is definitely not designed as an |OR, and is at the very least an educational reference list. Yes, I agree that citations should be included, and if the claim is dubious, the citations should be thorough and accurate. This by no means a reason to delete it, it is a strong reason to add clarity by clarifying the edit. I would also suggest strongly that we do not split this into multiple subtopics as others have suggested. 1, this would just garner merge tags to regroup them (as it should be), and 2, it adds risk that entire sections could be unnecessarily deleted, as shortened stubs
— User:Duuude007, 15:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)