Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinDirStat (2nd nomination)
There are two editorial reviews from sources I consider important. http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,64425-page,1-c,downloads/description.html A very brief review from PCWorld is useful but maybe not significant, due to its short length. http://download.cnet.com/WinDirStat/3000-2248_4-10614593.html CNET's editors' review makes me take notice, because I don't see many reviews from them these days. I'm not sure whether I'd classify Gizmo's http://www.techsupportalert.com/best-free-disk-space-analyzer.htm (source of this review) as reliable http://www.techsupportalert.com/become-a-reviewer.htm based on their editorial descriptions. This article currently reads as overly promotional; it needs to become more encyclopaedic. Finding additional  would help, as would deleting some of the current content
— User:Jodi, 13:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)