Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science and God
I have read your whole article and I can see why you argue that it does not meet deletion criteria. I'd like to link to some Wikipedia policies, to help you understand why people are describing the article as an 'essay'. Firstly, the article seems could be accused of giving |undue weight to the pro-God viewpoint, especially since the anti-God view is explicitly titled "Counter-arguments". Secondly I think the tone of the article could also be made more |impartial - the paragraph on Newton for example is heavily weighted by the inclusion of the sentence "whose discovery of the laws of gravity reshaped our understanding of the universe". Thirdly and perhaps most importantly, the article seems to go expressly against the guideline that |you should not avoid existing neutrality debates by creating new articles. In fact, this very topic area is the one given as an example for that section of Wikipedia policy. I agree that the article does a good job of citing its sources - perhaps other editors could give some examples of the passages they think constitute |original synthesis
— User:Noiratsi, 08:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:IMPARTIAL||WP:NPOVVIEW||WP:SYNTHESIS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)