Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electoral history of Dennis Kucinich
The relevant criterion for an article like this isn't notability but rather  and . That is to say, because Kucinich is notable, it's reasonable to have articles about other aspects of his life if discussion of those aspects would be too long to include in his article without it becoming too long. In this case the Dennis Kucinich article is just under 81kB and the electoral history article is just under 19kB, so if the electoral history were restored to the main article it would fall into 's category of "Probably should be divided", right on the cusp of "Almost certainly should be divided". That being said,  may still require that the electoral history article be cut down somewhat — whether a particular statistic is "pointless" or not is not for us to say, but we could certainly trim most or all of the results that aren't cited to a reliable source. &ndash;&nbsp
— User:Arms, 17:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPINOUT||WP:SIZESPLIT||WP:SIZESPLIT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Article size)