Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges (2nd nomination)
per sources listed in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges|first AfD (in the first Keep vote) and per . These sources are significant enough (in number and type) to show notability. The nom requests "substantial coverage" but  says ''significant'' coverage. Significant does not mean substantial, it means significant to show notability. Also the nom's focus on peusudo science theory as a reason to delete is incorrect because the article is about an NGO, not a fringe theory or theorist. What an NGO advocates is unrelated to the notability of the NGO itself
— User:Green, 04:20, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NGO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)