Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clarice Phelps
There is a lack of significant independent coverage.  Getting an award from the local YWCA does not help her meet any notability criteria.  As a for notability as a scientist, my search in Google Scholar found a grand total of 1 citation of papers she has authored or co-authored.  Just because she works for the government doesn't mean she can't publish papers (and she has), the only restriction is if her work is classified.  Her participation in the discovery of element 117 appears to have been very minor.  Her name does not appear in the Oak Ridge publication "The Discovery of Element 117". Her Oak Ridge autobio says her part of the discovery of the new element was to "contribute ... to the purification of the Bk-249 used to help discover Z=117".  Sounds like a very minor role in an undertaking involving a large number of people.  I don't see convincing evidence that she is notable as a scientist or meets .  I agree with the others who cited  as an issue
— User:Papaursa, 19:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)