Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chemical compounds with unusual names (2nd nomination)
provided it can be rewritten to meet Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines. I dispute the claim of extreme OR as it does not violate  or . It does not introduce a new theory or method of solution, original ideas, define new terms, new definitions of pre-existing terms, etc and all the information is verifiable (all the molecules and their names can be confirmed to exist). The criterion of "unusual" is not OR/subjective if verifiable, reliable sources say the names are unusual. The Bristol University page is referenced.http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/sillymolecules/sillymols.htm Exactly which part of  do you claim it violates? It can be made encyclopedic by improving the etymology
— User:Dbromage, 03:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:V||WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)