Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (third nomination)
The issue of sourcing is not, in my opinion, the definitive issue here. No one is disputing that the word "apartheid" is being used in each of these contexts. The problem is in deciding which uses are appropriate to list in this article. The opening paragraph of the page even says that "its meaning has been extended to include any wholesale cultural, intellectual, religious, economic, or gender based discrimination." Apartheid has become so widely used as an epithet that we are left to determine for ourselves which uses really qualify and which are mere rhetoric. That's the |original research problem. I don't see how that problem could be solved
— User:Rossami, 20:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)