Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hogg
He's been in the news for a mere two weeks -- and on top of that, only for ''reacting'' to the shooting. That is maybe sufficient justification for a blurb somewhere, but is not one for a standalone article. However, the ongoing reaction to the shooting (debate, possible new laws/restrictions/regulations) is admittedly one of the more distinctive parts of this incident, and Hogg plays a significant role within that aspect. Over the next couple weeks, it's possible that his notability could move beyond , by becoming a sustained activist over a period of time (principally unconnected from the incident at Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS). In order to balance the potential that he'll just be washed out in the next news cycle against that of premature deletion, I think that the article should stand as-is for several weeks. I propose to close this AfD "without prejudice" so it can be reopened in several weeks. If nothing's really changed by then, I would '''merge''' this article, and those of Cameron Kasky and Emma González, into Never Again MSD. '''&mdash
— User:Cnzx, 05:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:1E (Wikipedia:Notability)