Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideological Turing test
Per , a topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. These sources exist—in addition to the sources listed by {{u|Omegatron}}, the sources that provide significant coverage to the topic include at least one book chapter, at least two peer-reviewed journal articles, and two doctoral dissertations available on ProQuest.Irwin, William. "Saturday Night Live and the Political Bubble." Saturday Night Live and Philosophy: Deep Thoughts Through the Decades (2020): 51-61.{{cite journal |last1=Hannon |first1=Michael |title=Empathetic Understanding and Deliberative Democracy |journal=Philosophy and Phenomenological Research |date=22 July 2019 |volume=101 |issue=3 |page=591-611 |doi=10.1111/phpr.12624}}{{cite journal |author1=W. Joel Schneider |author2=Alan S. Kaufman |title=Let's Not Do Away with Comprehensive Cognitive Assessments Just Yet |journal=Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology |date=1 February 2017 |volume=32 |issue=1 |pages=8-20 |doi=10.1093/arclin/acw104}}Snow, N. D. (2019). How to Talk: Richard Whately, the Constitutional Conversation, Informal Social Groups, and Reform (Order No. 22587156). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2310307809).Shugars, S. (2020). Reasoning Together: Network Methods for Political Talk and Normative Reasoning (Order No. 27835438). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2402915321). As a result, I believe that the article meets notability standards and I oppose the deletion of the page
— User:Mikehawk10, 08:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)