Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpiderGraph chart
I am extremely concerned by the apparent onflict of interest by the article's writer, who is acting as a ingle-purpose account here; the  responses only make it worse. Okay, so this SpiderGraph chart is a product among many, and it differs ever so slighty from the others (which product doesn't?). The majority of the current article tries to show this difference from normal spider charts. However, this screams advertisement to me, and wikipedia shouldn't be a plateform for this kind of material. Any general stuff should be mentioned (along with non-promotional sources) in the Spider chart article, e.g. to illustrate minor possible deviations, the rest is simply  in my eyes. &ndash
— User:Sgeureka, 10:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:C||WP:S||WP:TLDR||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Copyrights)