Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperlexicon
The current sources don't look reliable - they appear to be personal websites, written by the same author, and the definition given seems to be the invention of that author. A google search shows that the term does appear to have some usage, so it's possible that an article on it might be written; this isn't it however - neither the content nor the sources would be useful for a rewrite, so probably best to delete per 
— User:Girth, 13:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)