Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary G. Enig
Due to the fact that this person has received scant mention by reliable sources, how do you propose to overcome the fact that this article presents only her non-mainstream views and nutritional advice without citing any reliable sources? If you are voting to keep the article, could you please improve it with citations from |reliable sources rather than just vote to keep the article as is?  It seems to me that her numerous WAPF articles and overall influenence in the field of nutrition have not been deemed significant enough for reliable sources to even bother to comment on them.  Why should Wikipedia give her and her views an uncontested article?   In my opinion, this article should be deleted if it were to stay as is.  However I would support her biographical information being incorporated into the Weston A. Price Foundation article in the same mannor as the co-founder, Sally Fallon
— User:OccamzRazor, 20:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)