Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exodus 21:12
We don't cover "Bible-cruft" but most biblical verses probably do have good solid credible coverage - and secondary analysis - in multiple reliable sources. I don't have a strong view on covering all bible verses but a good case could be made that we should. (For instance at the risk of touching on , we have full articles on every episode of many TV series that got much less coverage in  than 2000 years of biblical analysis). Copyright doesn't seem a problem - most translations of Exodus are not copyright in the United States and even if one or two are, a single verse would not be breaching copyright (at worst fix it). The problem is that this is an appallingly poor stub (as others also said). It's a translation list with what appears to be a brief personal view. Either remove original research/unbalanced views and allow eventualism to expand the stub with analysis and balanced commentary, or delete without prejudice for now. Same net effect. As a valid article could surely be written, no real benefit to deleting
— user:FT2, 02:15, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)