Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Akin rape and pregnancy controversy
thanks everyone for their !votes. I'd say that no one arguing keep has demonstrated enduring significance in a diverse range of sources that warrant this fork as required by . The article as it stands is mostly stuffed with "reaction" (always a warning sign) and lengthy quotes. So clearly is in need of merging. I am worried that a lot of people !vioting keep (Sue Gardner is a particularly worrying example!) are working of their own opinions and POV that this should exist... I am pleased to see an article about the whole topic exists - which includes a number of examples of a similar situation to this. I think we have a very strong argument for merging to there
— user:ErrantX, 12:26, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:EVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)