Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MILF
I was going to base my reasoning off of #DICTIONARY "Encyclopedia articles are about a person, or a group, a concept, a place, a thing, an event, etc. In some cases, a word or phrase itself may be an encyclopedic subject..." That last bit is currently under discussion. I don't believe any deletion based on that part of NOTDICTIONARY should go through until that is reconciled. There are other reasons in that policy that apply. Namely: ''Concept''. MILF is not just a term. It is a concept that has become so widely known that it has its own genre of porn. That alone is sufficient for an article. It transcends just being a fetish involving older women (since that could be an article called "Older woman fetish") though. The concept has become part of pop culture and is reflected in various forms of media. But if it is to be deleted and "Older woman fetish" is to be created it needs to be put up for a move discussion since "MILF" is how it is known. All of the notability arguments should touch on the fact that Google News, Google Book, your favorite video store, and God only knows where else point to it being common enough. And it is already more than a dictionary definition so a merge is not adequate
— User:Cptnono, 07:03, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)