Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Svidersky (2nd nomination)
When an article is |notable and |verifiable and |not original research and written with |reliable sources and someone still invokes "unencyclopedic" as the reason to delete, how do we possibly dispel that bogeyman other than to say, this ''is'' encyclopedic.  If it's too much of a memorial, if it needs a rename then thrash it out on the talk page.  But the level of sourcing makes it abundantly clear that this article is valid per our standards.  Don't buy the rationale that it's about "mourning sickness"?  Well, sorry, the sources in the article already made the call.  And so what the nomination really comes down to is 
— User:JayHenry, 01:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTE||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)