Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Acocella bibliography
Wikipedia is  a CV. We don't include every publication for every academic we have an article for. The guidelines for what to include aren't as clear as they could be, but especially if we're talking about spinning off to a separate article in order to include ''everything'', there really needs to be a degree of importance for the author or publications that would allow a bibliography to satisfy our notability criteria on its own. For example, there are reliable secondary sources about the collective oeuvre of, say, Kurt Vonnegut or Emily Dickinson, and there are published bibliographies on major subjects in scholarly works. That's the sort of thing we would need for notability, and it just doesn't exist for most subjects (even notable subjects). &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 02:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)