Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanu Ikechukwu Anthony
Setting aside the accusations of racial bias in the nomination, his linked Google Scholar profile at first glance appears very strong for philosophy, enough for #C1. However, investigation shows that a large fraction of the citations to his works are self-citations, which would not count towards #C1. So I think we would have to look elsewhere for notability. For instance, is his journal ''Igwebuike'' a "major, well-established academic journal" as #C8 asks for? My guess is no. Does he have sufficient in-depth coverage in reliable sources (such as major national Nigerian newspapers) to pass  instead of ? The article doesn't make a case for that in its current state but I would prefer to reserve judgement in case this AfD can turn up better sources
— User:David, 19:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)