Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pier Giuseppe Monateri
I agree that Canoe's reasoning for removal of that content was invalid (see my comments about  at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Pier_Giuseppe_Monateri WP:BLPN regarding this article). However, even ''if'' the sources for the "Legal problems" section are reliable, why is any of that content worthy of inclusion? Is it appropriate to include mere allegations into a BLP article? It appears there was no conviction, no trial; not even any charges. But the most important issue with the article is that, other than the three Italian sources in that very contentious section, there are absolutely no references. So how can someone be notable if there are zero sources to prove it? And even if there were reliable sources to support all the content, does Monateri meet any of the nine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28academics%29#Criteria notability criteria for academics/professors?  --Special:Contributions/76.189.111.199|76.189.111.199
— [[User talk:76.189.111.199|talk]]), 04:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOENG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)