Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Tobinick (2nd nomination)
I did a database search and found, for example, a http://articles.latimes.com/print/2002/may/13/health/he-disc13 2002 article about him in the ''LA Times''. And a http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2012-12-08/health/fl-stroke-brain-injury-treatment-20121206_1_stroke-patients-boca-doctor-traumatic-brain-injury 2012 article in the ''Sun-Sentinel''. His h-index is 11, so I agree he's not notable as an academic. But he appears to generate enough coverage in independent sources to meet . In fact, the 2002 ''LA Times'' piece devotes coverage to the fact he ''hadn't'' published as much as some of his peers would have liked. I'll note, though, that it appears he's published in journals a good bit more in recent years. All in all, it seems he's attracted enough interest from reliable sources to have a short article on him and his work. I don't understand why having an article would be a problem, unless the subject himself objects to having an article here, which would be another story
— User:Biosthmors, 20:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)