Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamaskan Dog
While I laud users Badbilltucker, Keesiewonder and Wwwwolf for their efforts to maintain |civility and |assumption of good faith in this discussion, I want to point out that as of today, there are ''no'' |verifiable secondary |reliable sources to establish |notability, breeding community acceptance, or even existence of this breed. Everything I've turned up on searches are WP mirrors or sites that accept user submissions, (often the submissions are identical from one site to another), all of which seem to lead back to the author's web site on Tamaskans. The article itself is a |conflict of interest as the author or people associated with the author seems to be the only source of information, and the links in the article lead only to web sites maintained by that group of people
— User:Tubezone, 01:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CIVIL||WP:AGF||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Civility)