Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert K. Preston
WRT the suggestion that this article be merged with "White House intruders" -- could those who advocate this make a greater effort to explain how this would be an improvement?  The article has been renamed to the incident, so calls upon the |biographies of living persons policy, or the |coatrack essay are no longer relevant.  I looked at "White House intruders", it includes '''''zero''''' details on any of the incidents or individuals it lists.  So, those arguing for a merge are either all the details in this article be discarded, or they are arguing that "White House intruders" should contain a bare list, where ''one'' entry is populated by details, and the rest aren't.  In the first instance, why throw away the information about the incident, or in the second instance, why not keep the list an easily navigated list, with no details, and place all the details where they belong, in the articles about the alleged perpetrators and/or incidents
— User:Geo, 18:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)