Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAGIC Foundation
Between Anarchangel's "OMG Google hits!!!" frothing at the mouth and Carrite's assertion that the provisions of the GNG and WP:CORP should be suspended if the subject is worthy enough, there's a lot of chaff here lacking verifiable substance.  The core content policy of Wikipedia states, explicitly and baldly, "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."  Show me some reliable, third-party sources discussing the subject in "significant detail," as relevant policies require; something that, for all of Anarchangel's impassioned assault on the nom, neither he nor any other Keep proponent has found and added to the article.  I rather think we don't want to get into the business of suspending  just because we fancy that the subjects are nice people
— User:Ravenswing, 11:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)