Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WindowsWear
Hi Logical Cowboy, thanks for your comments above. Sources listed are not 'passing mentions' by my definition. In 4 of the 8 references listed (Elle, Time Out, Glamour, Lucky), WindowsWear is the subject of the piece – actually 6 out of 8 if you count the two lesser quality refs of Refinery29 and Fashinvest. The Wall Street Journal is a good solid ref for establising names of the founders and the existence of the company, albeit a paragraph in a piece about life after Lehman Brothers. WWD – also a respectable business-facing source – gives us a 100-plus word paragraph in a piece on Christmas window displays, in which one of the company founders is used as a commentator on trends for Christmas display timings. Back to  and I'm struck by the fact that this suggests that if coverage is not substantial 'then multiple independent sources should be cited'. I'd say WindowsWear does provide multiple sources via these 8 references – enough to support the existing article
— User:Libby, 10:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)