Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gualtiero Piccinini
I can see how Thoughtmaker can claim the subject fails the |general notability guideline since there is really not much |secondary source information on him, not much in the news, not much in the non-academic world. One thing I look for in the lede paragraph is the "X is notable for..." line, and the current lede only suggests what the subject is ''working on''. That said, there is a strong http://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=sVwspDQAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&pagesize=100 publishing history with many of his articles cited by many others. Further, he published an article in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy which is impressive; ditto Popular Science. Further, he is an editor of a journal in his field. So, I am uncertain how to call this one. I bet in ten years there will be more sources. Sorry to be so wishy-washy but I am undecided
— User:Tomwsulcer, 16:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:Notability)