Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Zurawik
but ''improve'' the sources. I did a quick read through of the article, and searched him up on Google. It seems that he does pass  (barely) and . He won the Arthur Rowse Award for press criticism, a National Press Award (which is reliable referenced http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/bs-md-press-club-zurawik-20150729-story.html here and is independent of the subject). In , he meets criteria in point four, sentence b. Though sources and the writing of the article and its format needs improvement, that is not a reason for deletion per  and . Per these criteria, I support a weak keep. I would also support '''userfying/draftying''' the article and moving to the main-space if the article is improved
— User:CookieMonster755, 20:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:JOURNALIST||WP:ARTN||WP:ANYBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)