Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climaticide
I have to agree with the nom.  In checking it out, there may appear to be some |reliable sources but I feel that it is not a |notable EO|neologism.  As you say "is being adopted at a rapid rate" shows a partial violation of .  Also, blogs are not a |reliable source because they can be created by anyone and not |verifiable.  Just recently, Avril Lavigne convinced news people that she was pregnant through "reliable" blogs.  The article is also very much into the relm of |original research
— User:Pmedema, 09:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NEO||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)