Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uwe Kils (2nd nomination)
I'm not impressed by the quality of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uwe Kils|the previous discussion. The deletes are mostly "vanity" and "non-notable" without any elaboration and the keeps are mostly "verifiable" and "notable" without any elaboration. It looks more like a vote than a discussion. I think that, rather than relying on precedent, we should come to a fresh consensus on whether he passes 
— User:David, 07:29, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)