Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HQ9+ (3rd nomination)
While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HQ9+ (2nd nomination)|previously discussed at AfD and the result was Delete arguments are stronger, and there is no double jeapordy in Wiki. An article which is notable will survive all reasonable XfD's
— User:Cewbot, 00:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE (Wikipedia:Deletion process)