Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-liked YouTube videos
Per  list articles are appropriate when there are secondary sources covering the general category; not every entry needs to be covered in these sources. Here, there are several media sources giving coverage to the most liked YouTube videos. While this article has citations to a quite frankly obnoxious amount of YouTube videos, there are a number of secondary sources spread out over a few years. The sourcing is however a bit weaker than other recently nominated list of… articles, so I’m only voting weak keep. Also, I’m not concerned with original research, since at worst the article is sorting numbers from largest to smallest. This is a  | routine calculation requiring no independent thought, so I don’t think it violates our no original research policy
— User:Spirit, 05:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:CALC (Wikipedia:Notability)