Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phaser (game framework)
I think we can be more lenient with free software relative to commercial software, but there still have to be some independent, secondary sources for notability (otherwise every project on github could have an independent article - we still need some standard for notability). I can't find any sources for this subject, outside blogs, and the only blogs we allow are news blogs subject to editorial control. I think there is room for improvement here - ''Linux Kernel Monkey Log'' should definitely be considered a , but the bar would still have to be high, and even the blog sources for this seem to be relatively minor
— User:SeraphWiki, 23:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)