Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unit cohesion
Frankly,  either, but let's keep in mind that AfD is , nor is it about getting rid of  articles.  It's about  of the topic itself, irrespective of content.  Perhaps the term "unit cohesion" has picked up some unfortunate dog-whistle politics | dog-whistle frequencies in the debates over DADT (and over overt expressions of minority sexual orientation in the U.S. military.)  I wouldn't know.  Nevertheless, it's a significant military concept, per comments above.  As for remedies suggested above: I oppose deleting the references to the DADT debate, since this aspect of the topic is hardly insignificant -- if anything, there's probably a notability argument for a debate over unit cohesion vs gays in the U.S. military article, as suggested by (yes, gay-friendly) sources like this one: http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/index.html
— User:Yakushima, 06:38, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:UGLY||WP:NOTABILITY (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)