Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curious George Takes a Job
meets  and , ''Curious George Takes a Job'' article listed multiple |reviews prior to nomination so why is it here? This is another bundled afd that highlights the problems with doing so, for example lets look at ''Curious George Rides a Bike'', a quick basic gsearch ("Curious George Rides A Bike  book reviews") brings up multiple reviews in the 1st few pages: a ''Kirkus Review|Kirkus'' https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/h-rey/curious-george-rides-a-bike/ starred review here, ''Books for Keeps'' http://booksforkeeps.co.uk/issue/147/childrens-books/reviews/curious-george-rides-a-bike review here, there is even http://www.wcl.govt.nz/blogs/kids/index.php/reviews/kids-club-review-by-elroe-curious-george-rides-a-bike/ a recent (sept 2019) child's review here that although not |reliable does reflect the impact that this title still has after over 60 years. Also, http://www.wcl.govt.nz/blogs/kids/index.php/reviews/kids-club-review-by-elroe-curious-george-rides-a-bike/ this ''The Washington Post|Washington Post'' article, as well as having a review of ''Curious George Gets a Medal'' within it (Ding!:)) mentions "By the end of the 20th century, over 25 million copies of George’s seven volumes had been printed" bringing the 1st 7 titles into the realm of the bestseller, another criteria of nbook. in conclusion ("thank goodness for that.:)), a special plea for afd nominators pllleeeeeezzzzze carry out , especially for bundles, prior to nominating
— User:Coolabahapple, 12:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NBOOKS||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)