Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Young
This AfD is open already a while but all this while no case has been made for deletion. As is clear from the improved article, the actress meets both  and . If one were to claim that the films in which Young has lead roles are non-notable, these could be listed for deletion, however these films meet . My claim is not that |other stuff exists. I reject such arguments. Rather I'm pointing out that there are obvious dependencies here. It's like the category that is listed for rename but the name change should be discussed at the critical article for that category. Same with a lead actress of multiple feature films at the "Major film studio#Current|Big Six". Only if the movies are nevertheless proven non-notable it would even be conceivable that their lead actors are non-notable. And even then Young meets the . But without addressing the films no case for deletion would be possible. Sure, it is said in the intro that the actress is not notable by the relevant professional guideline. It is the how not notable by that guideline that defies logic without procedurally addressing the films. After all,  is crystal clear: actors ''are'' notable (amongst others) if they have "had significant roles in multiple notable films
— User:Gidonb, 00:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG||WP:NFILM||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR (Wikipedia:Notability)