Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places in The Chronicles of Narnia (2nd nomination)
per {{u|Bearian}}. There's some overlapping coverage, but it's ''not'' a complete duplicate |content fork, so that portion of the "keep" arguments is thus invalidated. As well, given the ''age'' of this alphabetical list, which is arguably the ''better'' of the two, likely precludes us from outright deleting per . The merge should occur at the talk page of the subject list; we shouldn't dictate where or how to merge. Sure, this list needs some improvement to meet , but it's not a complete fail, either. As well, we have to remember "keep" and "merge" are essentially variants of each other; thus, those who !voted "keep" despite this being |not a vote will likely be amenable to a merge in some fashion. That is, they just oppose deletion (for different, some incorrect, reasons
— User:Dmehus, 02:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:FORK||WP:ATT||WP:LISTN||WP:NOTVOTE (Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks)