Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Kendrick
Not |notable, |general or uthor|specific. olicies and guidelines|Policies and guidelines concerning |BLP's are clear: {{tq|"Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."}}. This would not be dependent on individual editor likes, dislikes or "crusades" but sourcing. "Crusades" aside, the opening statement does include "Problem is there is a lack of reliable sources..." and that has become apparent. If or when there is enough sourcing I would agree that having "fringe" topics is not bad but that would also include bio-content to make the article more than just a SEUDO|Pseudo-biography
— User:Otr500, 13:53, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:A||WP:P||WP:BLP||WP:PSEUDO||WP:notability (Wikipedia:Notability)