Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death by ice cream
I was honestly expecting this to be nonsense, and instead it is a meaningful and surprising collection of sourced deaths. It is not  because no ''conclusion'' is reached: it simply lists together related cases. Nor it is , for the same reason: this is not a primary essay on ice-cream related deaths, it just summarizes what sources say. Other rationales like "it's trivia" or "we can't have deaths by X articles" are just  non-arguments. I think the delete !votes should look beyond the fact that the article title sounds funny or trivial, and reason by policy
— User:Cyclopia, 12:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:No original research)