Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual Dark Web
doesn't pass .  Nearly all these sources are opinion pieces and op-eds; the article literally has only a single sentence that isn't just quoting someone's opinion, cited to the only non-opinion source.  This fails the bare minimum of sourcing necessary for any article - we need at least two sources we can cite for statements of fact, and as it stands we only have one.  I'm just not seeing how people can support keeping it based on these sources - they're really, really poor.  A handful of op-eds is not enough to support an article on a neologism. This could support a sentence or two on Eric Weinstein, but there's clearly not enough to support a full article
— User:Aquillion, 12:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)