Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mawla (2nd nomination)
I am not sure why we are even discussing this. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. To be frank this article is not even a dictionary entry as does not even define the term. In my opinion one of the shoddiest articles on wikipedia which should have been tagged with speedy deletion rather than AFD. There are millions of words used in the Hadith and the Quran, so are we going to include them all in wikipedia because they are "important in Islamic studies"? I am afraid not. The  is on the keep voters to show that this word has a unique definition within Islamic theology which has been given in depth coverage by multiple reliable sources. Otherwise, lets get rid of this mess please. Regards
— User:FreeatlastChitchat, 07:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BURDEN (Wikipedia:Verifiability)