Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidewalk cafe
Neither the original reason for nomination claiming that it is a common vocabulary term or the unsubstantiated claim that it adds no value to Wikipedia etc. seem valid. The additional comment by the nominator claiming that "Sidewalk cafe" is a combination of two common vocabulary words to create an unambiguous, self-explanatory term also does not seem to be a valid reason for deletion. Sidewalk cafe is used as an independent subject in official documents like the https://books.google.com/books?id=XshcoFjozNUC&q=%22sidewalk+cafe%22&dq=%22sidewalk+cafe%22&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwij0eSqk9rkAhWIA2MBHUJQALgQ6AEIUTAF New York City Charter and Administrative Code and other similar documents. I'm not sure that  was properly done. A quick search reveals that it has also received in depth coverage by multiple reliable sources like for example https://books.google.com/books?id=fM7a-OBysYcC&pg=PA454&dq=%22sidewalk+cafe%22&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwij0eSqk9rkAhWIA2MBHUJQALgQ6AEIaDAI#v=onepage&q=%22sidewalk%20cafe%22&f=false this book or https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/8/19/20812235/sidewalk-cafes-sidewalk-space-noise-complaints-citations this article by the Chicago Suntimes, https://streetsillustrated.seattle.gov/urban-design/public-space/sidewalk-cafes/ Seattle's government, or https://austintexas.gov/sidewalkcafe The city of Austin, etc... Since the article does not violate  I see no reason to justify deletion
— User:Crystallizedcarbon, 10:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:ISNOT (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)