Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul C. Gartzke
Fails the  and none of the keep arguments are compelling. Especially the ones made by Asdasdasdff. Who cut and pasted the exact same crap about how voters where just lazy, didn't look into it, and don't understand how courts work into 6 other AfDs about judges. Yet the user never provided any sources in any of them that would help them pass . I guess they were to busy attacking people to find any. Lazy indeed. So.....Delete it is
— User:Adamant1, 23:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)