Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Lauren Wasilewski
I'm inclined to think that if the original nominator felt so strongly ("super-duper") about the need for a redirect (rather than deletion) then perhaps this should have initially been raised on the article's talk page first. Nonetheless, having considering the sources provided above, I'm inclined to think the subject passes . I would caution the use of some of those sources (like the one from the Huff Post which seems to have been a non-oversighted "student contribution" and so might fall under  and the couple that are blogs) but on balance there's a few there which, in my opinion, constitute enough significant coverage to justify the view that the subject meets notability requirements. The Cleveland-based ones, especially, provide plenty of "significant coverage", with enough non-Cleveland coverage to avoid  arguments
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]], 02:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:USERG||WP:LOCALFAME (Wikipedia:Notability)