Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expenditure incidence
no evidence of substantive coverage, no sources in article, just a small amount of incomprehensible jargon. That it is WP:IMPERFECT (which is just ''one section'' of diting policy) is the least of its problems -- there is the fact that it is in pervasive violation of  &  -- and last I checked that is "a reason to delete
— User:Hrafn, 15:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:E||WP:V||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Editing policy)