Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lurline, California
Fails . Part of a mass article-creation campaign based on use of bad sources, and misstating what good sources say. Note to closer: I seriously suggest not relisting these California AFDs unless someone finds a good keep rationale as there's thousands of them coming down the pipe. Someone spent literally years creating tons of these articles and they all have basically the same problem: they rely on bad GNIS data and at most one other source (Durham) which they typically mischaracterise (e.g., Durham will say there was a single building at a location in 1870-something and the author wrote an article about a ghost-town at that site). A "locality" in Durham does not mean an inhabited place
— User:FOARP, 12:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GEOLAND (Wikipedia:Notability)