Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 shooting of Philadelphia police officer
Meets and exceeds , with 80 citations so far.  People's unfounded objections include , but that's a misreading of the policy.  See , which reads, for example, «Once every four years, the United States holds an election for President. These elections are "routinely" covered by every news outlet and the event is a "pre-planned event" as a part of the United States Constitution. However, that does not mean that this coverage would be excluded from notability discussions because of the  guideline.»  Besides,  is designed to weed out "announcements, sports, or celebrities," not actual Lone_wolf_(terrorism)|lone wolf terrorism.  Another unfounded objection is , but  alone trumps that, and anyway the ''book'' citations nix the argument, as, by definition, coverage of the subject in books by definition is not news.  The final objection raised is "selective quotes and a POV essay."  This is egregious, since , deletion is not cleanup: if anyone has any genuine objections to the material as presented, the forum to raise it is on the TP, and not AfD
— User:XavierItzm, 19:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTROUTINE||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:DINC (Wikipedia:Notability)