Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Church of Google (3rd nomination)
I agree with the deletionists that the sourcing for this article is horrible. However, it's simply not true that there are no reliable sources. One just needs to actually look in more than a casual way. After bypassing the self referential citations and blogs listed in the article, I find that there are more than sufficient |reliable sources, including several newspaper/magazine articles I located via Google (CoG?), and a couple provided by Quiddity, as listed below (and added to the article
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)