Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold War Crisis
the problem with these articles is the utter lack of reliable, independent sources. The worst is Mental Omega, which has precisely one showing its nomination for an award it didn't win (I couldn't even confirm the "honorable mention" claimed; the source just gave a list of all nominees). Thus, the article's content isn't |verifiable. Take such lines as "It is quite critically acclaimed" or "C&C All Stars garnered much attention in the C&C modding world" - says who? If I were to change the article and write that the mod was a critical failure, could you show me to be wrong? If there are no independent, reliable sources, the mods obviously are not notable (and by the way the same criterion applies to standalone games, too). The one (except Cold War Crisis) most easily salvageable probably is ShockWave, which claims an award for a game unit and a magazine article without providing details (such as the name and issue of the magazine
— User:Huon, 23:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)