Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Rogge
It was not my intention to remove any information from the article -- that happened because of an dit conflict|edit conflict and the lost material has been restored.  As for the reasons for the deletion nomination, prolificity is not in itself a cause of |notability.  If the volume of Rogge's work is so significant, than an independent writer should have picked up on that and written something about it in a |reliable source.  The fact is that IMDb is ''not'' considered a reliable source in ''establishing'' notability, since the filmographies there can (and often are) faked.  I do not believe that to be the case here, and I am making no accusations, I am just pointing out |Wikipedia guidelines.  Since no reliable sources ''can'' be found, there isn't enough fact on which to |verify this article.  If anyone can find sources that have not yet been identified, they are welcome to do so
— User:WikiDan61, 12:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:E||WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:IMDB||WP:V (Wikipedia:Editing policy)