Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karikku (2nd nomination)
There has been mention of paid editing in this discussion.  {{U|Tachs}}(jojo@nthony) has invited scrutiny of his home page as evidence of no paid editing, and I personally opine that is not a suitable in itself for any such determination, although obviously we have contribution history as well, which perhaps gives some some input.  I do seem to note quite a number biographies of deceased persons and it it unlikely in my opinion these would have been subject to paid editing.  I note also some BLPs and maybe some organisations within the set where there might perhaps been risk of a request being made for a paid edit, but I also judge they are within the range of his normal writing interests as far as I can tell  So while Tachs/jojo@nthony probably has the skills for paid editing, as do many of us, I have no reason to assume it has occurred and  certainly assumes it should not.  In terms of the current article {{Tlx|TempUndelete}} on the previously article incarnation and the draft article would be needed for further scrutiny (unless one is an admin) so I see purposes here at this AfD to determine if this incarnation of the Karikku article is fit for mainspace based on its current content and available sources.  Thankyou
— User:Djm, 08:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)