Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamrock Shake
Yeah, I did read these.  Look, if an independent reputable publisher prints a story that is effectively a press release, that doesn't make it any less a valid reference. We're talking about the Shamrock Shake here, not Watergate. You want investigative journalism? What is there to say beyond the press release that you would expect a newspaper to tackle? It's up to consensus on the related articles if this is better merged or not, but it's clearly notable, and not a candidate for deletion.  In the US and Canada, I'm willing to guess more people have heard of a Shamrock Shake than can name many of their national or local political leaders. Arguing that this topic, while of zero humanitarian or intellectual value, is not notable just doesn't pass the smell test.  If this topic wasn't notable according to , we would have to change 
— User:T, 01:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)