Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Cantor
Does not pass , it seems, but arguably passes . A search on GS (for: "Paul Cantor") turns up 34 citations for a book, then 3 in the 20s, and others with fewer citations. A search on WorldCat (again, for: "Paul Cantor") does not turn up any book with major library holdings. A search on GN (for: "Paul Cantor" literary) turns up 37 news items, from the early 1990s to 2009. Several of these news items are by reputable outlets, and cite him as an expert in a way that supports the claims of the article, which is why I think the article should be kept under 
— User:Eric, 00:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)