Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (6th nomination)
The vague argument that there are  violations is not backed by facts (in fact it is contradicted). The way that  has (and is) vetted by this list, is by validating that a direct quote (from the scientist him/her-self) is directly in opposition to one of the three consensus criteria, this by itself meets BLP.... but the editors of the list has always gone further ... we've verified that no statements could be found that contradicted the quote, or that the quote, seen in a larger context, may have been out of character for the scientist. The scientists are all required to be notable (by wikistandards), so that a larger context can be verified against (per ). Finally it has always been policy to remove people from the list, iff there was any doubts on their inclusion, until such time as a discussion showed consensus on the addition. The main problem that people have with this list, seems to be one of |"i don't like it".. but there is a significant encyclopedic navigation purpose served by the existance of it
— user:KimDabelsteinPetersen, 13:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:BLP||WP:LSC||WP:IDONTLIKE (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)