Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedSpotGames (2nd nomination)
A video game publisher of notable games |does not mean the publisher is notable. Of the sources listed, Wired, Engadget and GameSpot are reliable and notable. But http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/21/redspotgames-looking-to-continue-publishing-for-dreamcast/ this one and http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/22/redspotgames-has-plans-for-further-dreamcast-development/ that one by Engadget are pretty much the same - hell, they were published a day apart. The http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gc-2008-they-are-still-making-dreamcast-games/1100-6234455/ GameSpot piece covers the same as Engadget. http://www.wired.com/2007/08/new-dreamcast-g/ Wired's piece is different though. So out of 31 references, there are essentially two that are reliable. That does not meet  and does not mean there should be an article on RedSpotGames
— User:Soetermans, 10:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INHERIT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)