Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Avalon Collection
Lack of ''citations'' is grounds for improvement, and some primary sources may be ok for supporting uncontroversial statements. ''Nonexistence'' of reliable secondary sources is grounds for questioning otability (books), which seems to be a problem here but is not the issue raised by nominator
— User:Ningauble, 17:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)