Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MKR (programming language) (2nd nomination)
There really are no reliable sources for this.  Almost everything is material self-published by the creator of the article.  It fails , , and is mostly .  The author reached hard for sources, even at one point citing a mailing list on which it was mentioned a few times; McCulloch was trying to argue that it had some benefit to the XML/RDF community, and got a few responses.  (Although the article doesn't link to its sources, you can, in fact, find most of them on the web.) The language got short entries on long, comprehensive lists of AI tools.  I've been looking for more sources; I tried Google and Google Scholar, and the best I could find was a paper by McCulloch (editor who created the article) rejected by a regional AI conference in Florida. It's not even getting blog references.  This isn't new work; it's been around for years. As for the lecture notes cited, they're online.http://www2.cs.uidaho.edu/~jeffery/courses/monvis/lecture.html The reference to mKE is in a lecture about debugging tools for the Unicon language, and mKE is "the Largest Publically Available Unicon Program (50K lines)", and it's mentioned as something to practice debugging upon. The entire reference is three lines.  That's it
— User:Nagle, 16:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOTE||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)