Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditions of the University of Santo Tomas
To the next editor who will decide on the fate of this article. The editor who nominated this for deletion said, ''I redirected this article because I could not identify sources which were not either primary or non-regional according to WP:N/WP:NORG.'' So because of that, I looked for sources, from the original 50+ sources, this article now has 80 sources, to which 44 are reliable, secondary sources. His issue has already been resolved. That editor did not nominate the article because of the content, not because of the trivia too. Almost all of the content here are supported by those 44 reliable articles. The others are supported by university-based publications. Meanwhile, there are 4 tables here, and based on , the 4 tables are not trivia as they are ''selectively populated list with a relatively narrow theme''. The Traditions of Texas A&M University, where I patterned this article from, contains a lot of ''trivia'', because thats what you get from an article based on ''traditions''. You expect everything to be trivial. But, to counter that, significant amount of sources have already been provided. Again, the problem with the sources has already been addressed
— User:Pampi1010, 02:31, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TRIVIA (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)