Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainspotting (2nd nomination)
One big piece of  cut down to look like an acceptable stub. Before the CSD was removed and the article gutted, I thought it was hopelessly OR, a rambling essay, even fringe fluff. It was promotional in a subtle sort of way that did not trigger the immediate, visceral response G11 articles usually evoke in me. If I'd just honored the #G11 when I had the chance, we would not be here, but I held back. A link to a Lawyers-are-us site & 2 local news fluff pieces '''does not, as Jytdog put, show an improvement in sourcing
— User:Dlohcierekim, 14:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:CSD (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)