Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Roanoke Obama campaign speech
The numerous |reliable sources which have covered this topic establish that it clearly satisfies .  '''If editors are using this article as a oatrack''' (and I'm not saying that they are), oatrack is just an essay, and even if it's legitimate concern, this can be addressed through '''normal editing of the article'''.  I see no policy-based reason to delete the article.  Indeed, the nomination makes no policy-based reason for deletion.  Instead, the nomination argues that the article should be deleted not because it doesn't satisfy , but because "'''Republicans are trying to use as an attack'''".  Since when do we care whether a particular political party likes (or dislikes) an article?  Again, this nomination has no bearing in Wikipedia policy as far as I can see
— User:A, 01:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:C||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)