Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yehuda Kolko
per Leifern and IZAK, particularly due to the ibel issue.  There is no indication that the case has even gone to trial yet, let alone reached a verdict.  A mere "allegation" or "civil lawsuit" against a person is completely NN (unless the person is ''already'' notable, and even then it's questionable.)  The only possible notability at this point is that he is an "Orthodox Jewish rabbi", making this a Man-Bites-Dog story.  The article itself alludes to its NN, by acknowledging that the "impact of the allegations remains unclear."  Bottom line:  Delete now and revisit the issue once the criminal/civil cases are concluded and the societal impact becomes clear
— User:Nmagedman, 11:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:L (Wikipedia:Lists)