Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hurricane Rainband and Intensity Change Experiment
This seems like an interesting topic (but a terrible title for the article), but sadly, it fails our notability standards.  The four references in the article are to scientific papers, which are first-party sources, and thus not suitable as sources to establish notability.   I looked at the three sources supplied by {{U|OtterAM}}.  The Science Daily piece is a reprint of an NSF press release.  I assume NSF is the funding agency, so this is again a first-party source.   The phys.org one is, again, a reprint of a press release ("Source: University of Washington").  Although it's not explicitly stated, the USA Today piece also reads like a press release.  The best source I see is the Washington Post article suggeste by {{U|Happysquirrel}}.  This is a good source, in a major newspaper, which discusses the topic in depth.  But, it's just one source, and since I can't find any others, I'd have to say we this fails 's ''multiple sources are generally expected''.  So, I'd say move to draft, work on finding better sources, do some serious rewriting of the article text, definitely find a better title (''RAINEX'' comes to mind), and maybe at some point in the future it'll be ready to move back to mainspace
— User:RoySmith, 13:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)