Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Century technology
That would be something that should be brought up in the article talk page, not an AfD, isn't it?  Actually, since the talk page consensus is removing the lengthy list, you might as well be  and remove it yourself(and maybe leaving the sourced sections/sentences).  I don't see moving it to AfD without actually trying to contribute to the article while claiming it can be real and notable.  For the time issue, I will have to admit that I have been really busy and most of the sources and work on the alleged  articles of the said project are produced by me, and while others might support my work in some clean up, I have to from time to time engage in long and tedious AfDs. I will remove the list now, to show that it could be and would be done in order to save the article.(And also include the sources I brought up here)  However, please be patient while the grammar and spellings might be terrible since not much time was given for me to translate the sources and include Japanese quotations since I type Japanese really slow due to the fact that I do not know how to pronounce a lot of kanji(but my Chinese background allowed me to be able to read and understand most of them).  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|signed comment added by
— User:Mythsearcher, 13:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BOLD||WP:NN (Wikipedia:Be bold)