Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcello Guido
Sorry, but I'm not convinced by the discussion above or by the nominator's retraction. None of the many sources in the article appears to be |reliable, and, although I can find plenty passing mentions of the subject in reliable sources,http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=h_hPAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Marcello+Guido%22&dq=%22Marcello+Guido%22&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=27http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ep9UAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Marcello+Guido%22&dq=%22Marcello+Guido%22&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=30http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YTvmAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Marcello+Guido%22&dq=%22Marcello+Guido%22&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=36http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=XlfqAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Marcello+Guido%22&dq=%22Marcello+Guido%22&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=47http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=r7JUAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Marcello+Guido%22&dq=%22Marcello+Guido%22&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=64http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BxjqAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Marcello+Guido%22&dq=%22Marcello+Guido%22&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=67http://www.professionearchitetto.it/news/archivio/piazzetta_toscano/piazzetta_toscano.asphttp://www.vivienna.it/notizie/notizia.php?id_news=8908http://www.exibart.com/profilo/eventiV2.asp?idelemento=16942http://www.salernocity.com/news/default.asp?codice=18125&directory=Culturahttp://www.ideamagazine.net/it/rep/rmc0505a.htmhttp://www.edilportale.com/eventi/scheda-evento.asp?idevento=1102http://www.professionearchitetto.it/mostre/notizie/1592/Manifesto-tecnico-di-Marinetti-e-l-Architettura-oggi none of those sources has as much as a single whole sentence about him, so they can't be said to constitute significant coverage. The issue isn't whether "Marcello Guido's architecture is worth the article", but whether there is significant coverage of him in independent reliable sources
— User:Phil, 21:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)