Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fugenx
Article topic lacks |significant coverage from |reliable, |independent sources. (|?) Yes, it's in those few listings, but among hundreds of companies, I'd only consider that significant if a secondary source felt it appropriate to report the accolades. I did a ProQuest firehose search of 50+ databases and only got minor and press release hits. The app company had no meaningful hits in a /RS|video game reliable sources https://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=003516479746865699832:leawcwkqifq custom Google search. None of its apps have received enough reliable coverage to warrant so much as a sentence... so the article can't even act as a holding area for barely notable apps. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. –&nbsp
— [[user talk:czar|czar]], 02:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42||WP:VG (Wikipedia:Notability)