Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio Lacerda
there are three sources given in the article, and they are all I could also find in a search. The first, a book, is presumably a good source. the next two are minor mentions, less than a sentence each. That means that there is a lack of SIGCOV in multiple sources, so it is clearly a delete. His work is very nice, however, so I think there will be coverage in future. At the moment, however, it is clearly  
— User:ThatMontrealIP, 01:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)