Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HeartattaCk
I don't deny that there are some real challenges for someone who wants to make a good article here.  I've added some sources and some notes to the talk page.  Much of the article is based on claims by the publisher--which is not unusual for a small periodical, but secondary sources would be better.  Unfortunately the marginal nature of the publication results in secondary sources being mainly blogs and websites that don't normally meet .  If, however, these sources are accurate (and they don't seem to be controversial) then this thing may have had a circulation of ~10,000 and represents a large enough community that this should be covered in the 'pedia
— User:MrFizyx, 04:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)