Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human disguise (2nd nomination)
A literary device that has been used throughout the recorded history of literature, mythology, and religion.   The article itself is well referenced.  The Westfahl references transcend merely the listing of examples, http://books.google.com/books?id=fNJRAAAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA163&dq=%22human+disguise%22&lr=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&as_brr=3#v=onepage&q=%22human%20disguise%22&f=false this quotes Voltaire discussing the concept used in the context of pagan deities, Judaism, and Christianity.  The nom has questioned the  of the subject; the Voltaire bit alone should establish notability.  As to the other claims of , , , and ; these are the result of there being so many examples of this device mixed with the eagerness of Wikipedians to add to story. Combining that with the need to "defend" the article from repeated attempts at deletion; has led to the long list of examples, some of which do go beyond the scope of what this article should be; I'm sorry but the Trix Rabbit?  The article's lead, which doesn't contain , , , or  is enough for my Keep !vote; the rest of it enhances the article, puts it into fantastic historical perspective, and more fully elucidates the point.  I would also like to point out the lack of assumption of good faith and the excessive badgering by both sides of this debate.  Everyone who has voiced an opinion on this page has done so because they believe they are making Wikipedia better and their opinion should be respected whether you agree with it or not. Other than that I have no strong opinions on this matter
— User:J04n, 10:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:PRIMARY||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:PRIMARY||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:Notability)