Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solyndra loan controversy
Tempted to call for a |Speedy G5 as a Grundle2600 shtick here but too much time has probably passed to get that to swing.  This is what we have to deal with time and time again in this subject area; that something ''happened'' (there was a loan to Solyndra) is fact, that that fact is a ''controversy'' is what is debatable here.  Criticisms of a fact don't always add up to a full-blown controversy per se; this is the political arena where anythings politician does is going to be automatically hated by slightly less than half of the electorate.  I think to justify a full article or an entry at a politician-related page (e.g. Dan Rather memos or Bill Ayers stuff), a "controversy" has to reported as exactly that, and not just be a composite of "well, some people criticized it" news stories
— User:Tarc, 13:01, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SD (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)