Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Mezvinsky (2nd nomination)
or '''Redirect'''.  I agree with the comments made above.  The only press is through Chelsea Clinton, who is herself a secondary figure, only |notable through Bill Clinton, which makes the connection here even more tenuous.  Also, the sourcing seems to fall solidly short of the notability guidelines.  Although the politicsdaily source seems to be written directly about him in detail, I think  applies here.  Also, although that source isn't exactly a private blogger, it's not exactly a reliable news source either--it is even presented as "Political gossip", and that's the only source with much detail.  But even reading that source, most of it just talks about the Clintons.  If, a few years from now, he is still getting the same degree of coverage, and there is more material to construct an encyclopedic page, even if all the coverage is through association with Chelsea, I might reconsider.  But this article as-is is unencyclopedic and cheapens wikipedia...there's only enough sourceable material for a paragraph or two, and breaking it into headings just makes this page look like a magnet for celebrity gossip
— User:Cazort, 04:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)