Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out Now Consulting (2nd Nomination)
How is a promotions and marketing company that focuses on the LGBT market any different in  to a promotions and marketing company that focuses on sports fanatics? or single mums? I do not agree that the niche that this company applies itself to makes it at all notable on its own, and, sadly, that seems to be the ''basis'' of this article's support. I have read the entire discussion, article, references and do not believe that  exists to anywhere near the high level that a company of this nature (marketing and promotions) would require on Wikipedia. Furthermore, I think it is highly likely that the vast majority of the editors that will be involved in the maintenance of this article will come from within this particular company, () or have a direct involvement with this company. Can people in this position write POV? Yes. Is it likely that they will? No. Also, I must comment that  is recommended to NEVER BE USED as an argument to keep or delete an article, and has been used extensively in this debate. Even though I read through the entire proceeding text, I agree with the nominator and was not convinced that this article was any more than careful 
— User:Aliasd, 12:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N||WP:SOAP||WP:NPOV||WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:VSCA (Wikipedia:Notability)