Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comfort Keepers
nbsp; The parent company Sodexo is covered at investing.businessweek.com, which in my experience has been a good indicator of wp:notability, in this case for the parent company.&nbsp; Since this topic already has UE weight in the encyclopedia at Sodexo, there is no theoretical case for a EL8 deletion.&nbsp; We also know from the large number of reliable sources found that the topic passes WP:GNG.&nbsp; There is a theme in the AfD of the potential of this article to be used for WP:NOTPROMOTION, but no WP:NOT policies are mentioned in the nomination except what we can guess was intended by the reference to WP:G11, but G11 has been mentioned to say that it is not applicable.&nbsp; Some exact words from the nomination are, "substantial...coverage", which looks like it could be related to the words "significant coverage" in WP:GNG, which would make it a WP:Notability argument.&nbsp; WP:Notability, to rise to the level of eletion Policy, must rise to the level of EL8, which as already stated is not a valid deletion criteria for this topic.&nbsp; There remains the issue of WP:NOTPROMOTION raised by others, and I am aware of the long-term potential for moneyed interests to undermine a volunteer organization over the long term, but at the same time it is not actually practical to write an encyclopedia article without making it useful to readers, which in this case includes those who want to sell franchises.&nbsp; At an absolute worst case, EL14 here, just as with EL8 here, does not allow deletion of the topic itself from the encyclopedia, so what is left is that WP:NOTPROMOTION must be dealt with as a content issue, not a deletion issue.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 02:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:D (Wikipedia:Disambiguation)