Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles E. Wicks
While there's little sign of  C1, I believe the  C4 case from the apparently fairly widely-used textbook.  The other book is reasonably highly cited, and I think it saves this from being a .  The article is in relatively poor shape, but as usual, 
— User:Russ, 10:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF||WP:BLP1E||WP:DINC (Wikipedia:Notability)