Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On Genetic Interests
Having been schooled in my credulousness by ජපස and XOR&#39;easter (which I very much appreciate, btw!), I'm now quite undecided. As it now stands, the article features two pieces of critical commentary from apparently legit sources—Kenan Malik and Catherine Nash. Most charitably interpreted, that passes . Less charitably interpreted, it doesn't: the mention in Nash's book is only in a footnote, although it's a long footnote. In addition, the book has received some attention from fringe scholars and outright Nazis. That does not confer notability, but I don't think it's outright irrelevant. ''The Bell Curve'', for instance, is also a widely discredited book that (I assume) has received lots of favorable attention from fringies and white supremacists—and, imv, is almost certainly notable. So I'm not sure quite what to think, but I'm trending delete now
— User:AleatoryPonderings, 21:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)