Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Friedman
My thought are similar to what Rebbing articulated above. Overall, this is a borderline case and (in ordinary circumstances), I would have probably recommended a redirect as there are not enough independent secondary sources to establish notability. However, the socking and the unwillingness to disclose the COI is extremely troublesome, not to mention the personal attacks. The history of sockpuppetry indicates that we are dealing with a long time POV pushing editor who is clearly Wikipedia:NOTHERE|not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia, but rather to Wikipedia:PROMOTION|promote themselves. This kind of behaviour should not be encouraged. What particularly ticked me off was playing on the sensitivities of the community about gender and using it for promoting their own interests. It wasted a whole lot of time and created bad blood among longtime members of the community. Let's stop this right now. I recommend a delete under |CSD G5 - article created by a blocked user in violation of a block
— User:Lemongirl942, 05:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:G5 (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)