Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PureVPN
It initially twiggesd my mind ... ''PureVPN''  ... I ''think'' I've heard of that before (but I could equally be mixed up with something else).  It seems to have large market share and has sustained but the choices for the reception section may not be neutral (and they were sloppy, no access date, not archived, url's swapped, one probably non neutral, not sure if the other (CNET) had actually reviewed from using the product rather than taking info from the website).  Other reviews https://www.techradar.com/uk/reviews/pc-mac/software/utilities/purevpn-1325640/review techradar 2018, https://uk.pcmag.com/vpn/4500/purevpn PCmag 2018 https://www.comparitech.com/vpn/reviews/purevpn/ comparitech, https://thebestvpn.com/reviews/purevpn/ The Best VPN (2019) (possibly not RS and possibly negative POV) perhaps paint a more balanced picture.  So it seems there are about 78 VPN products and we not would expect a wikipedia article for each.  That said PureVPN has , has about 2000 VPN servers (About 3rd or 4th  here),  and is headquartered in Asia so an article may well be warranted.  But it really needs to be beefed with a few more details and  probably needs to be tagged or to be sorted
— User:Djm, 12:37, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)