Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia defense (2nd nomination)
This |neologism doesn't appear to meet basic notability requirements. I'm not finding any coverage that mentions the term besides the Signpost article and a short https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061013/072913.shtml Tech Dirt article. Perhaps someone can dig up more sources and start a legal section on the crowdsourcing article. Useful content could be merged to Floyd Landis doping case, but the inclusion of SCO v. IBM as an example seems to be original research
— User:Gobonobo, 01:44, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)