Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wyatt Gallery
With regard to the museum holdings, I certainly see the claims, but no accompanying . The only sources in the article are still all limited to his own web-pages. We all seem to agree on this. However, I still don't see that real sources would even be enough for a "keep". The claim of something like "so-and-so's photographs are in 2 museums" is pretty much on par with "so-and-so's research is in 2 journals" &ndash; this is far more of a ''necessary'' condition rather than a ''sufficient'' one, considering the oodles of museums and oodles^2 number of artists represented therein. There is nothing ''substantive'' which really makes this person stand out from the herd of others. (I'm sure lots of artists have "explored Japan, Vietnam, Cambodia" et al. for inspiration.) Awards such as "25 Under 25, Up-And-Coming American Photographers" seem to me to be hollow accolades, on par with Marquis Who's Who|Who's Who and such. Add to this the fawning tone ("a celebrated American Photographer"), and it sure paints a picture of being a  fan-page. Respectfully
— User:Agricola44, 16:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PUFF (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)