Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynette Sweet (2nd nomination)
there appears to be sufficient impact to meet  and the article is of benefit to the encyclopaedia. I have to agree that there is more to meeting  than suspecting that an article might not meet the notability criteria and it most certainly is the problem of new page patrollers to make good faith attempts to check if there is a reasonable expectation that the article might be improved in the near future with better sources. This is not a good nomination and the nominator should have spotted that the last AFD was a speedy keep less than 3 weeks ago which, even though it was problematic, is an indicator that any new nomination should be carefully written and would have benefited from an explanation of whatever efforts that were made to address the BEFORE guidance. An improvement notice on the article would have been sufficient to encourage discussion and improvement, an AFD in this situation is unhelpful and appears heavy handed
— User:Fæ, 12:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)