Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the United States presidential election, 2012
Back in the days before Wikipedia, this stuff was used as filler to keep the A section of the newspaper from getting too small; most of it went unreported because, well, nobody really cared, and there was generally enough political news/gossip to fill the news hole. And nobody really cares today; it's just more accessible because it's used to fill up websites instead of paper pages. The first two-thirds of it is routine ''pro forma'' diplomatic chatter, utterly unnoteworthy. Most of the rest is talking-heads space-filling speculation which in an earlier age would be filed in the periodicals section of the library or put on microfilm and ignored forever after; it is impossible to pick out what is notably prescient or stupid, and unless it somehow seizes the imagination of the world (which none of it has—I would have noticed) there's no reason to memorialize any of it here. Verifiability is beside the point; its the unimportance the material that is the problem. It's being used to fill out the  trope that this is some sort of "Once to Every Man and Nation" epochal decision, when the truth is that this kind of material is ground out at every election, and then promptly (and rightly) set aside and ignored
— User:Mangoe, 13:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)