Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Hunter Johnson (3rd nomination)
This discussion isn't as close as a !vote count would make it appear. There's little approaching  applied to the page and a reasonable search doesn't find anything much better. As pointed out by the nominator, the only source that looks at all reliable (Kidscreen) ''doesn't even mention the subject''. The standard for  is significant coverage by multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. Nothing like that here. I don't see any assertions above which refute the nominator's statement that the even more stringent  isn't met by the sources applied. I would have no objection to draftifying, but as it exists, there's nothing here to keep. Even a presumption of possible notability via WP:PEOPLE requires some sourcing for verification. We don't have anything meeting the standard
— User:BusterD, 22:39, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IRS||WP:GNG||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)