Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard William Paul
there are ''zero'' secondary sources in the article, so he'd fail  and .  He's ''not'' cited widely in the leading undergraduate textbooks. (See: John Chaffee, ''Thinking Critically'' (9th ed.), {{ISBN|978-0-618-94719-5}}; Brooke Noel Moore and Richard Parker, ''Critical Thinking'' (10th ed.), {{ISBN|978-0-07-803828-0}}; Peter Facione, ''THINK Critically'', {{ISBN|978-0-295-73845-8}}.  He is cited once, in end-note 1 from page 2, of Hassham, Irwin, Nardone, and Wallace, ''Critical Thinking: A Student's Introduction'' (4th ed.) {{ISBN|978-0-07-340743-2}}.  I don't think that allows him to pass the PROF test; however, if you can find additional evidence, please ping me
— User:Bearian, 20:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:42 (Wikipedia:Notability)