Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public restrooms in Bratislava
nbsp; After skimming this article, I don't see why the nominator wants this article listed at AfD; fact is, the nomination does not make a complete argument for deletion, nor does the word "delete" in bold using an argument listed at  constitute an adequate !vote.&nbsp; So the best thing would be to get this speedy kept #1 with WP:NPASR within 24 hours of nomination, so that the nominator can decide if he/she is willing to do some additional work to prepare the rest of the community for a deletion discussion.&nbsp; Given that parts of the lede appear to be WP:OR, there could be content problems, but to separate this possibility from good material it would help to show that the Hungarian sources are not adequate.&nbsp; Beyond that, it helps if an AfD nomination explains why the content is so objectionable that it cannot be merged.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 23:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATA||WP:SK (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)