Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of microfluidics research groups (3rd nomination)
as unnotable listcruft (no evidence of notability |for the set, even though some of the groups might be notable on their own). I could not find any valid keep arguments in the former two discussions. Though they are 4 and 5 years old, for the sake of discussion, I ping {{U|Nergaal}}, {{U|Riffic}}, {{U|Avala}}, {{U|Stvfetterly}}. Per , also pinging {{U|LibStar}}, BelloWello (indef block), {{U|Postdlf}} though the "delete" side does not seem to be in danger of under-representation
— User:Tigraan, 11:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:VOTESTACK (Wikipedia:Notability)