Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lum the Mad (second nomination)
For those editors above who say that books are available, I'd say go ahead and add listings for those books to the article.  I may have access to them as well, but I'll echo what other people have said here, which is that AfD is not something that should be used as a tool for "Hurry and clean up the article right away."  If it's obvious that sources exist, and the consensus is that the article should be kept, then tag the article as needing cleanup (which I do agree it obviously needs), and let's move on.  There's no urgency involved.  See 
— User:Elonka, 17:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)