Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Anne Sakovich
While there are roles here that could get her over  if the article were sourced properly, simply listing roles is not in and of itself an ''exemption'' from having to have any sources. But on a ProQuest search, the strongest source I can find harshly criticizes her acting skill right in its headline, so I really don't want to use it at all for  reasons — if she had 100 sources, it might not be so bad if one of them was a bit unkind about her acting ability, but if the ''only'' genuinely solid source she has is openly bashing her talent? And absent that, literally all I can find otherwise is glancing namechecks of her existence rather than coverage that's about her in any non-trivial way. And even if I ''did'' overlook my concerns and use the tricky source, it would still take quite a bit more than just one source to actually get her over the bar anyway
— User:Bearcat, 01:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACTOR||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)