Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human spirit
per the total rewrite since nomination that addressed the nom's concerns and turned an essay into an article that bears little resemblance to what was first sent to AFD. I wonder how a concept so heavily covered in http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Human%20spirit%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf8&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-US&tab=np books and even http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Human%20spirit%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf8&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&sa=N&tab=pn news could be seen as non-notable. The |potential for improvement seemed quite clear. Nice to see that someone was willing to actually |fix a surmountable concern through regular editing
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 01:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POTENTIAL||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state)