Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivaldi (web browser)
All things considered, this is one of the situations that the problem can be fixed instead of eliminated. Cursory web search shows good material on secondary reliable sources on websites such as ''TechCrunch'', ''TechSpot'', ''ZDNet'', ''Ars Technica'', ''Softpedia'', ''Gizmodo'', ''PC World'' and ''ExtremeTech''. Things that I would do instead of deleting would be revising the prose, deleting parts that are just reiterations of the infobox without additional ''value''. There is a |bit of raw download stat that should be deleted too. We need prose added from the mentioned source. I read some important things in the sources that does not appear in the article, e.g. how the browser caters to power users with quick commands. Also the citation style is also non-existent. Best regards
— User:Codename, 03:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTSTAT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)