Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Moorer
the article does establish notability of the subject with reliable sourcing that supports position of the subject, which is the criteria here. While the article's creator may or may not be the subject, it appears to treat the subject in a relatively neutral manner, or no less so that the majority of biographies of smaller venue artists. It could use more referencing, but there's no indication of extensive hyperbole. The article has certainly had more than one long term registered username make edits to it. An article possibly begun by the subject doesn't automatically qualify for deletion. Issues with a primary editor on this article, who is far from an  editor http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name=Smatprt&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/topedits/index.php?name=Smatprt&namespace=0, on other articles doesn't apply or belong here, that's a matter for /I or 
— User:Wildhartlivie, 09:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPA||WP:AN||WP:COIN (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)