Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Post
Interviews have always (since 2001) been accepted as precisely the sort of third-party coverage required for BLPs, as long as the interview is subject to journalistic questioning and editorial review.  Unless there is a drastic change of policy, interviews in |reliable periodicals are valid sources.  Whether this person is |notable is entirely another issue, of which it is not clear to me.  It's a |marginal case in my mind
— User:Bearian, 15:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BARE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)