Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perceptions of religious imagery in natural phenomena
and then shoot me, please.  "Less than serious newspaper" coverage.  We look at verifiability, not seriousness.  "This type of whacky article probably reduces the credibility of Wikipedia."  If it's verifiable and reliably sourced, your assertion fails.  "What if someone notices the face of Einstein on a piece of fruit?  Will there be an article on that in Wikipedia?"  If there's significant discussion of such a phenomena in the media, it just might be included in this article.  "If Wikipedia is to be taken seriously then we must delete this article..."  Sorry, I missed that particular criteria for deletion.  Funny enough, I did find |this, and I think that might be what you're asking for here
— user:j, 18:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)