Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermina Dunz (2nd nomination)
This article has been tagged since April 2013 for having only one reference (now a dead link) and as possibly failing to meet our general notability guideline.  It's never been improved. Being a supercentenarian (110+) is not inherently notable. I haven't searched exhaustively, but what I could find was a bunch of sites that mirror Wikipedia and a passing mention in a work of fiction https://books.google.com/books?id=jqiECgAAQBAJ&pg=PT145&lpg=PT145&dq=%22Hermina+Dunz%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=uEWHMYkDY-&sig=yWXQI9eL69ZTk04iCYLaYChuypQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwivroWNtZPKAhUKzmMKHcjiD3YQ6AEITDAM#v=onepage&q=%22Hermina%20Dunz%22%20-wikipedia&f=false. There's no evidence of significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. There's nothing of encyclopedic value in the article. 
— User:David, 19:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTMEMORIAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)