Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of radiata animal orders
per nom, unless it can be shown that historical sources provided extensive lists of this sort that go beyond the outline definitions already added to radiata.  That would make it encyclopaedic in my opinion, but the current list mapping modern groupings onto historical definitions is .  I'm not persuaded by the argument that contradictory definitions rule out this page.  That could be handled by separate sections, but as I say, there needs to be proper sourcing first
— User:Spinningspark, 23:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)