Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solynta
I was unable to find independent, in depth, reliable sources for this product; hence it fails notability guidelines per . Just FYI, the scientific notability guidelines are usually aligned with general notability guidelines. The main practical difference is that secondary content embedded within in primary sources is often considered reliable in general scientific notability discussions, but MEDRS is dubious about this and prefers dedicated secondary sources such as review papers, reliable books, etc
— User:Mark, 19:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)