Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political leaders renowned for their integrity (2nd nomination)
as inherently subjective, with unclear inclusion criteria. Lists must make a case that their subject is notable; it is not enough to say that all the items in the list are notable (for whatever reason) and therefore any conceivable grouping of them |inherits inclusion-worthiness from those items. This list is a prime example of why. Carrite makes an excellent point regrading how we can distinguish a politician famous because of their honesty from one merely perceived to ''be'' honest but not famous solely for that reason, or where we should draw the line on that. I also think the list is an inevitable edit war magnet, where supporters of one party will edit war to remove politicians from a rival party and substitute their candidates more to their own liking. Finally, I think the article was ''extremely'' lucky to survive last time, as IMO consensus to delete was clearly established
— User:Reyk, 07:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INHERIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)