Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional monarchs
I called for a speedy keep above but instead it was relisted even though were no delete !votes; tsk.  For avoidance of doubt, let's be clear that my position is that we should keep this per policies such as  and .  Now that we have an actual delete !vote, let's consider its claim that "''Category is enough...''".    This argument that we should delete the list because we have an :Category:Fictional royalty|equivalent category is contrary to our guideline  which states "''It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative. Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided
— user:Andrew, 09:24, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOTDUPE (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)