Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHMA-FM
I think we'll have to agree to disagree here.  I am interpreting the guidelines in this case rather than precedent - and I believe the article does not meet the guideline, even if |other articles exist or |prior AfDs have gone against these guidelines for whatever reasons.  In my opinion, using '''only licensing''' as terms for notability means that all information in the article (except the call letters) can be sourced from the station's self-produced press and other sources which may or may not contain actually reliable information.  (Because these sources are fine as secondary sources once notability has been established...)  If we choose that precedent over the notability guidelines at  or , it brings into question the accuracy of '''all''' radio-related articles on Wikipedia.  This is why the guidelines exist
— User:Addionne, 00:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OSE||WP:WAX||WP:GNG||WP:BROADCAST (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)