Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurence Brahm
as  and for lack of , despite all the hype on the page, sourcing is almost entirely PRIMARY,  many grand claims are unsourced, and I can't find anything much in searches, certainly nothing to support notability.  Great photo, though. I wasted a lot of time loking, but came down exactly as Nom
— User:FOARP, 15:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROMO||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)