Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur (Dungeons & Dragons) (2nd nomination)
The non-primary sources are just not sufficient for passing the .  The ones present are either from non-reliable sites (such as fansites), or are extremely passing mentions that have no discussion about them outside of basically saying "dinosaurs are a type of monster in D&D".  For example, the book being used as a source, "Religions in play: games, rituals, and virtual worlds", sounds impressive, but actually looking into it shows that D&D dinosaurs are mentioned exactly one time, and in no other context aside from being included in a list of a bunch of other monsters.  The ''number'' of sources stuck onto a page doesn't mean that much if none of them actually provide any kind of in-depth coverage or analysis that would allow an article to be written that could pass the .  And quite frankly, none of the ones present, or can be found upon searches, do
— User:Rorshacma, 16:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)