Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jankers
Doesn't seem like much more than a #DICDEF|dictionary definition and is perhaps more appropriate to Wiktionary.  With reliable, independent sources that tell ''why'' this is encyclopedic (beyond a definition), I'd say keep.  History? Origins? Cultural relevance? Don't see it yet.  Right now, it's dictionary material, and perhaps even a |neologism of sorts.  Jargon at best.  Please don't accuse me of "ulterior motives" because I'm not British.   This is a discussion about ''Jankers'', not Martijn Hoekstra or Keeper76.  Thanks in advance
— User:Keeper76, 21:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)