Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) (3rd nomination)
Despite the multiple accusations in POV forking, no one actually presented any evidence that the article's content is biased or factually incorrect. There were some concerns about the name, but  clearly states that we have no consensus on whether all "Criticism of..." articles are necessarily POV forks. It's most certainly not the only "Criticism of..." article on WP, and I really don't believe that we can just delete the entire page because of its title—particularly with much more sensible alternatives like renaming. As I said before, the article's existence is valid under , which specifically suggests that ''if a section of an article has a length that is out of proportion to the rest of the article it is recommended that a split is carried out
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK||WP:SPLIT (Wikipedia:Content forking)