Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave
per ist. It's only a limited number of names, each of which are sourced to a reliable source and provides a valuable information source grouped by theme into a structured list. Users will have some general idea of what they are looking for and then can used this list to navigate to those Wikipedia articles that provide more details on the person listed. I revised the lead to make it more reader friendly.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_papabili_in_the_2013_papal_conclave&diff=543843338&oldid=543831076 As for the concerns about , there is agreement above that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that the information in the List comes from a reliable source. Regarding "sepeculation", it is not Wikipedia generating the speculation. This is a world-wide interest event and the reliable sources are going to write such articles that are of world-wide interest. There's nothing wrong with Wikipedia providing a list summary of those reliable sources
— User:Jreferee, 14:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:L||WP:V (Wikipedia:Lists)