Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capoeira in popular culture (2nd nomination)
I concur with Stifle. As a topic, the appearance of Capoeira in popular culture isn't likely to be notable and isn't evidenced as such in the article except as a |synthesis.  As for the content, most of it is an |indiscriminate listing of details that don't even have to do with Capoeira.  This article isn't about a single subject but rather a multitude of different subjects loosly drawn together through original research to claim that it is Capoeira.  There's really nothing to merge back into the original article, as the few cited statements fall under different subjects entirely, such as Kickboxer 4, a gay porn studio, Hellboy II, and Paul Simon. This is what happens when articles don't stick to a strict, defined, and notable subject
— User:Themfromspace, 06:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:IINFO (Wikipedia:No original research)