Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagging
a |disparate scattering of uses of a term (and in one case, ''non-use'' of the term) demonstrates neither notability nor that the topic is a fit subject for an encyclopaedic article. You could as easily come up with such a grab-bag of sources for an ''article'' (''NOT'' a disambiguation page, Colonel Warden) on People in history named Robert, Brown dog, Things that smell like strawberries, or who knows what else. As  states: ''"As explained in the policy introduction, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia
— User:Hrafn, 03:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:IINFO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)