Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Astronomical Review
I could see keeping The Astronomical Review via a Wikipedia:Scholarly journal lowest possible bar for scholarly journals under  if articles within Wikipedia cited to The Astronomical Review, but there doesn't seem to be much usage of The Astronomical Review within Wikipedia per http://www.google.com/search?sitesearch=en.wikipedia.org&profile=default&q=Astronomical+Review&fulltext=Search#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Astronomical+Review%22+site:en.wikipedia.org&oq=%22Astronomical+Review%22+site:en.wikipedia.org&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=serp.12...6310.9765.0.11938.2.2.0.0.0.0.84.162.2.2.0...0.0.kGJTre-NpDY&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=fa1a64566e60c19f&biw=1920&bih=883 this search or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/The_Astronomical_Review what links here link. If you go around and improve 20 to 40 or so Wikipedia articles with citations to The Astronomical Review, then you might have a basis for keeping or recreating (if deleted) The Astronomical Review. External cites to The Astronomical Review would go towards make the collective event of citing to The Astronomical Review notable for a Citations to The Astronomical Review article (assuming third parties covered the topic), but still wouldn't  help a The Astronomical Review topic as a stand alone article
— User:Uzma, 15:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)