Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political change (2nd nomination)
per Cab.  (1)  We have a stub that hasn't been improved in nearly a year.  (2)  We have a premise that violates .  (3)  We have neither references nor sources.  (4)  The stub consists of the puerile statement "Political change refers to the concept of change in politics."  No, really?  (5)  We have a dicdef of sorts without a particular widely recognized definition.  (6)  This is a classic example of the limitations of Google hits.  "Red balloon" by the same test gives '''three''' and a '''half''' million Google hits ... should we on that basis alone have a Red balloon article
— User:RGTraynor, 17:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)