Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWWX
per Wcquidditch. Although Neutralhomer is correct that the base notability claims for a radio station are that it has a broadcasting license from the appropriate regulatory authority (FCC, CRTC, Ofcom, etc.) and that it originates at least a part of its programming schedule in its own studios rather than simply operating as a rebroadcaster of another station, Wcquidditch is ultimately ''most'' correct about what ''actually'' gets a radio station an article: |reliable source coverage that properly |verifies those things to be true. This was a completely unsourced two-line stub at the time of nomination, but a station is not ''exempted'' from having to cite reliable source referencing just because passage of our notability criteria for radio stations has been ''claimed'' — so what saves this isn't the statement that it exists, but the significantly improved sourcing and substance that have been ''added'' since nomination to ''improve'' the article
— User:Bearcat, 12:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)