Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey Updyke Jr
per nomination, per 86.17.222.157 and per . The act may have received substantial coverage, but it all seems to have been news about the act, and speculation on why he did it, rather than about the man himself. Hinckley, Oswald and Chapman, on the other hand, all received substantial and lasting biographical coverage, and not just about the single acts that they're known for
— User:Little, 08:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PERPETRATOR (Wikipedia:Notability)