Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankita Harshvardhan Patil
People are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have jobs: they actually have to have genuine evidence of fairly broad significance, supported by |reliable source coverage ''about'' them in ''media'' (which is ''not'' the same thing as "coverage of other people that happens to also briefly mention this person's name"). But nothing stated in the article is an "inherently" notable role that would get her over , and the article is not referenced even remotely close to well enough to get her over . And notability is , either: people aren't automatically notable just because they happen to have a family relationship to a notable person — so just because her father has an article doesn't mean she's automatically entitled to have one too. Also there's a possible |conflict of interest here, as the creator's username also has the subject's surname in it
— User:Bearcat, 17:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)