Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HeadKrack
Nothing in the article even ''tries'' to make a claim of notability (as opposed to mere existence) for anything, and none of the sourcing shown so far is cutting it. The ''LA Sentinel'' source shown above is not independent third party coverage about him, but merely leads to a YouTube clip of him speaking about himself in a Q&A interview, so it doesn't support notability at all — people get over GNG by being the ''subject'' of coverage written by other ''people'', not by talking about themselves or other things in Q&A interviews — and ''RapZilla'' is a |blog, not a reliable source. So the only reference that isn't a ''complete'' non-starter right off the bat is the ''Dallas Observer'' — but that's a local alt-weekly, so while it would be acceptable as one source within a ''mix'' of more solid sourcing than anybody has actually been able to show, it does not ''bring'' the GNG all by itself as an article's ''only'' valid source. Possibly just , so no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when somebody can do better — but he needs more and better sources than this
— User:Bearcat, 20:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLOGS||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Verifiability)