Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minty (My Little Pony)
The fictional pony and toy does not seem to meet the |general notability guideline as there is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. All that appears with a |search engine test are unreliable sources, like fan pages, primary sources or tertiary sources (like ''Toys and American Culture: An Encyclopedia''), but there is no objective evidence of notability from reliable secondary sources that give analytic or evaluative claims about the pony or the toy. The article itself does not provide evidence of notability for the character as there is nothing related to the reception or significance of the it, only |release notes or |summary-only descriptions. ''My Little Pony'' as a whole may be notable, but |notability is not inherited to every single |content fork. This particular toy/character seems more like an an |unnecessary split that does not have notability as a stand-alone subject. I do no believe that a merge is warranted since the information is barely sourced, that which is referenced falls into WP:!|what Wikipedia is not and it doesn't add anything of importance to the main article. I also don't think that a redirect is necessary since the disambiguation in the article title makes it an implausible search term
— User:Jfgslo, 05:08, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SET||WP:NOTDIR||WP:PLOT||WP:ITSA||WP:CFORK||WP:AVOIDSPLIT (Wikipedia:Notability)