Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Kudusay
In conducting a  search, the subject does not receive significant coverage in multiple reliably and independently secondary sources which indicates they fail . One can question the reason for the nomination if they want but I focused on the subject of the article which is really what is important. It does not matter how many countries the subject toured in. It does not matter how the article is written either. AfD is not article clean-up. It really doesn't matter what sources are or are not provided in the article so long as they exist but they '''have''' to exist and '''must''' be verifiable. If someone can provide three independent and reliable sources that give the subject significant coverage then I will re-evaluate my assessment
— User:ARoseWolf, 17:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)