Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitt Romney's tax returns
38 news articles; whether one believes that any of them have '''significant coverage''' about the specific subject is debatable. Same can be said if someone creates an article on Obama's college transcripts. Although there are over 1 million regular google hits about the subject, not all are |reliable sources, and against it is debatable of those that do fall under RS whether there is enough significant coverage about the subject. There should be an attempt to improve the article |before bringing up the article to AfD, to at least support that the subject passes notability guidelines. I would support a '''merge & redirect''' at this point to an appropriate article (there are multiple notable subjects if a merge were to occur), however if it can be shown that the subject is clearly independently notable in and of itself I can be persuaded to change my opinion to KEEP
— User:RightCowLeftCoast, 06:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)