Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragonlance artifacts
fails , I don't see any significant coverage of artifacts in Dragonlance as a whole, merely plot summaries (which don't qualify as significant coverage per ) for a few entries. Agree with nominator as to why such lists are not needed on WP. To efficiently deal with not-individually-notable fictional elements, we should just not mention them at all beyond what can fit into plot summary sections of notable articles. The need to make WP a directory or memorial to every fictional device (characters/objects/cities/weapons/ships/etc) that ever existed goes against  and particularly . Fan wikias are better suited to such a task
— User:Folken, 03:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:WHYN||WP:IINFO||WP:NOTPLOT (Wikipedia:Notability)