Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump derangement syndrome
This article appears to be well-sourced with multiple |reliable, |verifiable source that establish |notability. I don't think this violates OTOPINION at all; the term itself is a loaded one, for sure, but I think the article describes it accurately and without violating POV. In fact, it appears the article describes how the term has been used and defined by ''both'' sides of the political aisle, both by pro-Trump writers to critics of Trump, and by anti-Trump commentators who say it is used by the GOP to discredit criticisms of Trump's actions. Given the subject matter, I think this is a very balanced and well-written article, and a clear Keep vote for me
— User:Hunter, 12:04, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N||WP:NOTOPINION||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)