Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Frind
per /. User:Northamerica1000 could have stopped at the third citation; this AfD is carpetbombed with significant coverage whose primary focus is Marcus Frind. The coverage is related to his company, but it is clearly about how Frind's life experience, personality, abilities, attitudes, etc, affect the company. There is other source coverage whose primary subject is PlentyOfFish, and those articles are not the same as these. '''Red herrings:'''  only applies to Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual|low-profile individuals, not Frind. The significant coverage of Frind in major media is dated 2007, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2016... How is that ''one'' event?  The 2007 WSJ and NYT profiles found significance in Frind's individual productivity running such a high traffic/profitable website alone. The 2012 Globe and Mail profile covers Frind's childhood, education, family, and personality to shed light on his current business practices running a larger company. In 2015, the coverage was about the sale of his company. The list goes on. One event? Many events. Low profile? Absurd. Is his role in the event(s) not substantial or well documented? Also absurd. Bio doesn't even pass ''one'' of the three main criteria of BLP1E.  would be appropriate only if Frind were not alive, but even then it has ''looser'' criteria than BLP1E. An article about non-living person can be ''kept'' if only two of the conditions are met; with a living person, you can still delete the article if they are low-profile. Also, PlentyOfFish is a company, not an event
— User:Dennis, 17:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Notability)