Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William A. Tiller (2nd nomination)
It's crucial to remind ourselves that the analysis on Tiller's notability is grounded in what WP's established policy's are, specifically in this case . Tiller ''conclusively'' passes at least 2 of 's tests, #1: his WoS h-index is 28 (~2900 total citations), which is far and away above the usual h-index of around 15 or total citations of a few hundred, and #3: http://php.aaas.org/about/aaas_fellows/list.php AAAS Fellow, the AAAS being the world's largest general scientific society. You may have arguments for/against some of his other activities, but it matters not whether he is notable for those because he separately passes PROF and that alone is sufficient for this article to exist. If there are concerns about sources to flesh-out the article, then leave it stubbed for now. In other words, the article's content may be debatable, but it's existence is not. This discussion will certainly end in a "keep" and I hope it is not seen here at AfD again. Thanks
— User:Agricola44, 15:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)