Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TigerWiki
Could you explain your  assertation in more detail, in particular as the Wikipedia:Notability (software) guideline is "inactive", which is suggestive of highly contested ground.  Personally, I'm of the opinion that neutral, factual and concise articles on OpenSource software have a place on Wikipedia (mainly as per OTPAPER), regardless if discontinued or not.  I'm noting that the article has a claim of notability (the fork softwares).  There also seem to some snippets http://books.google.com/books?id=ur8D3BzrBu8C&pg=PP1&dq=TigerWiki p282, and http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1367497.1367581.  I'm no subject matter expert myself, but your user page profile intrigues me, and I'm looking forward to your reply
— User:Power, 23:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOTPAPER (Wikipedia:Notability)