Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craic
The article contains content that would be inappropriate for wiktionary. As Angr mentions, this is yet another example of Wolfkeeper attempting to impose an extremely myopic interpretation of policy.  is quite clear that ''In some cases, a word or phrase itself may be an encyclopedic subject.'' I don't think Wolfkeeper has shown that this is not the case for this article
— User:Bkonrad, 16:41, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)