Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of diplomatic missions of Northern Cyprus
Firstly, the article is referenced, a link to the official list by the official page of the Northern Cyprus Government was already on the page, see http://www.trncinfo.org/index.asp?page=220 here, yes it's in Turkish, but a quick http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=tr&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trncinfo.org%2Findex.asp%3Fpage%3D220 Google Translate clearly shows its validity, though I have also added an http://turkishcyprus.com/representative-offices.html English Link.   Secondly, diplomatic missions of nations, and partially recognized nations, are (or at least should be) inherently notable.  These are one of the main ways that a country attempts to exert its influence, as well as to maintain day-to-day relations with nations.  The fact that these are 'technically' not diplomatic mission, but classified as businesses, is because the countries they operate in do not recognize Northern Cyprus and thus they cannot get official diplomatic status.  This is similar to diplomatic missions of Taiwan, Palestine, etc.  Thirdly, independent citations are a difficult thing to find for diplomatic missions as they are something rarely talked about by the media or other purely independent sources.  While independent sources would be ideal, in this case, official sources that confirm the existence of these institutions are perfectly acceptable.  Finally, I'd suggest  keep on this, but I'm not fully familiar with that policy regarding AfD discussions
— User:Ravendrop, 05:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)