Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairfield Industrial Dog Object
Public art is notable.  Significant coverage is likely to be able to be found if you look hard enough - and a google search isn't looking very hard at all. Libstar, how many times must we tell you that google searches for things from the late 1990s and early 2000s (especially Australian) are not covered adequately on google news? Remember it says that  isn't a reason for deletion either.   The statue was erected in 2000, so it would make sense that significant coverage would have happened then.  As an example, {{AFL Ess}} dominated the Australian Football League that year, so why are their only http://www.google.com.au/webhp?hl=en#q=essendon+afl&hl=en&prmd=imvns&sa=X&ei=WIfnToqQOsWNiAfF-p3dCA&ved=0CBoQpwUoCw&source=lnt&tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2000%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F1%2F2001&tbm=nws&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=2a65d09baff23c8b&biw=1680&bih=925 2 GNews hits from 2000 about Essendon AFL?  Please stop trying to delete things based solely on google hits
— User:The, 17:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GOOGLEHITS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)