Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation Books
As infamous as this company has become, there just aren't any reliable sources that would show how it's notable. The only sources I've found have been articles briefly mentioning the company as well as of course a few blogs and websites talking about the controversy over authors not getting their royalties, none of which could be used as a reliable source. There's just nothing out there and since Wikipedia isn't meant to be a |soapbox for viewpoints, there's no other choice but to vote to delete.tokyogirl79
— NONE, 09:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SOAP (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)