Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odds Are...
I checked out the sources added after the nomination and they are 3 blogs (Vashivisuals, flixchatter, filmchecker)  2 of routine coverage without any critical comment (Screen daily and Ramolawpc the second is a copy of the first), a trailer without comment (freestyle) a tweet from someone the director used to work with no comment about the film, and the 3 VOD pages some with user generated comments (cinequest and amazon). The blog reviews do not meet the criteria #1 IMHO. If only it were the number of sources that mattered things would be much easier and we wouldn't have to go through them when reviewing new pages. Also we have to remember  is not an acceptable keep argument
— User:Domdeparis, 16:50, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)