Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valenzetti
seems to violate every rule I can think of, including . If this information hasn't been published elsewhere, by definition it has no place in Wikipedia. We can't even include info on the hoax itself, because *that* information has not been published elsewhere that I know of. If this wasn't from the makers of Lost, then it falls down under notability - what do we care about fan sites' fictional universes? If it was from the makers of Lost, but relates to unaired material, it falls down under  a crystal ball. So many reasons to delete, do I have to choose one
— [[User Talk:Stevage|Stevage]], 08:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:No original research)