Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James D. Zirin
U|Coolabahapple}} and {{U|Animalparty}} have ably outlined the guidelines-based rationale. His first book was reviewed by ''The Times'' (London), ''The New York Review of Books'', ''The Times Literary Supplement'', ''The New York Times'', ''The Economist'', and the ''Providence Journal''.https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-mother-court-by-james-d-zirin-2bzs3dph3znhttp://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/06/19/southern-district-court/https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/private/classic-suits/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/29/nyregion/first-if-no-longer-foremost.htmlhttps://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21605877-paean-oldest-tribunal-united-states-courtly-lovehttp://www.providencejournal.com/article/20141019/Entertainment/310199944 His second book was reviewed by ''The Sunday Times'' and ''The Spectator''.https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/books-supremely-partisan-how-raw-politics-tips-the-scales-in-the-united-states-supreme-court-by-james-d-zirin-b9ql3gbc2https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/02/how-impartial-is-the-us-judiciary/ These eight reviews alone meet  criterion #3 and then some. The subject is notable. Any other problems - autobiography and overuse of non-independent sources - can be dealt with by editing
— User:Worldbruce, 03:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)