Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael L. Vincent
Again your personal assumptions are not relevant to this debate regarding the notability of Michael Vincent. I have respond to the comment, and assured you I have no conflicts of interest. Like you I've been |assuming good faith. This is my first article, and I believe he is a notable addition to wikipedia so I have added it. 5 min after adding it, it was consistently tagged for speedy deletion, and passed despite the continued attacks. The evidence has been disregarded. It is a shame there are many who seem interested in arguing in the removal of relevant wiki material
— User:Gregg, 01:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: :WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)