Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wall letters
as  and . KarenAnn is right: the links provided are weak and somewhat non sequitor. This article could (and perhaps should) be recreated, as this does seem to be a genuine phenomenae. But as currently written, this smells too much of unverified original research. Delete, unless someone feels ambitious enough to do a complete rewrite and cite some better sources
— User:Scorpiondollprincess, 13:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:V (Wikipedia:No original research)