Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rutherford Journal
Notability is not demonstrated by the sources - Randykitty has accurately summed them up after the refbomb was unleashed. The editorial board does not determine notability for an academic journal - it is the journal itself that must stand on its own merits per   and . Also, thank you to {{u|Randykitty}} for showing me that ''User:Jpbowen'' has an article published in this journal http://rutherfordjournal.org/article030103.html. Hence, in my view he is acting in concert with a bias as demonstrated by over-enthusiastically arguing for "Keep". In other words, he has skin in the game and really should recuse himself, rather than arguing endlessly for "keep
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:ISNOT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)