Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriotic Nigras (5th nomination)
I concur with Thibbs, I'm not sure how exactly the nominator or the "delete" !votes are defining notability. The article has |many third party reliable sources discussing the subject in significant detail. That's all that's needed, and that's what is already present in the article. I don't mean to make bad-faith assumptions, but the people in favor of deletion's rationale seems to border more along the lines of . I don't like or condone this sort of activity from internet trolls either, but I also know that that has no bearing on  Wikipedia's standard of notability
— User:Sergecross73, 16:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)