Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. S. Jennsen
re|DouglasHatten}} try looking at .  It's a brief introduction to Wikipedia's concept of |notability.  The problem is that we need |significant coverage in |reliable sources.  "Significant coverage" means that it's more than just name-dropping someone or a single-sentence mention.  Reliable sources are publications that have editorial control, employ professional writers, and have a history of fact-checking and publishing corrections.  We can't accept citations to most |self-published sources, such as blogs, home pages, social networking sites, etc., because they have no editorial oversight.  One exception is that we can accept |certain self-published statements made by the subject.  As far as the two sources you've listed above, they look reliable.  If you can find more like that, it will probably save the article.  Others may disagree, but I'm not really convinced that two stories in small-town newspapers is enough coverage to satisfy |our inclusion criteria.  It may simply be |too soon to create an article
— User:NinjaRobotPirate, 03:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:42||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SPS||WP:ABOUTSELF||WP:CREATIVE||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything)