Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copy (written)
Reads like what I'd expect to find in a dictionary, except perhaps a bit more detailed. If it's in fact a stub, then the theory is that it could later be expanded into a proper encyclopaedia article. But it's hard for mew to imagine what that article might be like, other than an -filled essay on the technique of copy-writing. What else is there to say about it? And why hasn't someone said it, these 14 years? —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:MrDemeanour, 11:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)