Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of politicians in India charged with corruption
though I am open to being persuaded. Can someone please point to me where in  it states that high profile people (which every politician with a WP article is) cannot be described as having been accused of a crime? I'm specifically drawing the line here at politicians for which charges have been filed in a relevant court of law (or, in India, there are bureacratic, extra-judicial equivalencies)?  Note that this article used to be something like "accused of corruption", and after quite a bit of work, specifically with reference to  concerns, we restricted it only to those people with charges filed. Lastly, please note that the indefinite semi-protection is irrelevant--it's there because new/IP users don't understand or refuse to accept the "accused"/"charged" distinction. No one would argue that indefinite semi-protection on Barack Obama is somehow an argument for deletion
— User:Qwyrxian, 22:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)