Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Goenka (2nd nomination)
The reason given in the deletion nomination looks false. I don't find article promotional in any sense. Whatever the information is written is supported by the third party reliable source. It also doesn't make any claim on notability through her family, even her father's name is mentioned once only in Personal life. Now, just because her family is known, the article shouldn't suffer. After reading the guidelines of Wikipedia:BIORELATED|BIORELATED, I do not think if it applies here. It meets , , , as the subject has gained significant media coverage from the various newspaper and the nominator should have performed . Also, I think if any article contains any PROMO in the page, it needs a Wikipedia:Fixit|WP:FIXit, not . I also found '''the article PASSED AFD''' in its Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rachel_Goenka|last nomination in 2016. So, I'll go for keep. --Special:Contributions/2401:4900:5177:719:257F:5030:40FA:6AFF|2401:4900:5177:719:257F:5030:40FA:6AFF
— [[User talk:2401:4900:5177:719:257F:5030:40FA:6AFF|talk]]), 10:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:NBIO||WP:BEFORE||WP:DELETION (Wikipedia:Notability)