Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimlock (2nd nomination)
49 sources this time.  The nominator seems to be on a deletion spree motivated largely by antipathy towards to subject matter rather than a genuine attempt to understand and engage with the topic.  This seems to be  writ large but, per ''de gustibus non est disputandum'', this is not an adequate reason to delete.  The nominator seems like those old-school educators who deplored comics on the grounds that they were not proper literature.  But Jane Austen and Dickens were considered frivolous amusements in their day too — ''plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose''.  It remains our policy that |Wikipedia is not censored
— User:Colonel, 13:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:CENSOR (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)