Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mackenzie Institute
Organizations don't get to dictate that an article cannot exist at all if it's not their own massaged PR version — inclusion is governed by ''our'' notability standards, article content is governed by ''our'' content standards, and the organization themselves get ''no'' special right to override our rules in either area. If the organization has |bias concerns about the content, they can raise their issues on the ''talk'' page for ''discussion'' — but they do ''not'' get ''veto'' rights over whether the article is allowed to exist at all, or what it is or isn't allowed to say. No prejudice against renomination in the future if a ''valid'' reason to delete can be found — but "the organization wants it deleted because their own PR whitewash of it has been reverted" is not a valid reason
— User:Bearcat, 00:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)