Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Obama assassination plot in Hawaii
I've not read the Hawaii one yet, and I don't have time to look into it yet because I'm about to go off for a few days for the holidays. I'll check it out when I get back and vote accordingly. However, I am the primary author of the Denver and Colorado ones, and I take exception to the fact that they have been lumped in with the Hawaii article. Both of those are well-written and well-sourced with sufficient secondary sources that are independent of the subject, which satisfies the |general notability guidelines. However, because they've been lumped together with an article that may not yet satisfy those guidelines, they are going to be getting delete votes that, in all likelihood, should only apply to the Hawaii article. Furthermore, both the Denver and Colorado articles have already been thoroughly vetted, and '''both are good articles'' (see Talk:2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Denver/GA1 and Talk:2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Tennessee/GA1). In fact, the Denver one is under consideration for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Denver/archive1|featured article, and has already been the subject of a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Denver|pointy deletion attempt, for which the result was keep. I'm trying to assume good faith here, but lumping these three articles together is simply unfair
— User:Hunter, 13:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)