Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrish Banerjee
as is stands, it seems clear that the subject fails  – zero significant coverage outside of the usual cricket stats sites which, as they contain records for almost everything, cannot be held up as an indicator of notability. Articles compiled exclusively from these sites tend to be as described above – "a stat dump masquerading as a biography" – which will almost always contravene OTSTATS. Finally, while playing the odd match here and there may be enough for NCRIC, it is a rather poor indicator of whether a subject will meet  – the guideline is obviously overly inclusive, and as such should be largely disregarded at AfD (per consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 135#The criteria of SPORT here are too inclusive|this RfC
— User:Wjemather, 10:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)