Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Tucker (2nd nomination)
The overwhelming coverage that has been made on Tucker's research and his routinely being employed as an expert on the subject by mainstream media is quite sufficient as a rationale to keep the article. The dogged assaults on these articles, with much sophistry, leaves me with a strong impression of |I don't like it and it is increasingly difficult to retain a |good faith attitude towards editors who appear to want to purge Wikipedia from covering certain topics which remain paradoxical towards Scientism|current scientific consensus, based on that as the main motivating factor. With basis in Hepcat65's comment about other biographies I think a major argument here is that there shouldn't be another standard for articles on people which some editors scorn, basically on dogmatic grounds.  __
— User:Meco, 09:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)