Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is Genesis History?
I'm sympathetic to the nominator's argument and have considered nominating this myself several times, what with the tedious back-and-forth that's been needed to keep it from becoming a creationist . However, I don't think  applies here, since this is not an article about a fringe theory, it's an article ''about a film'' about a fringe theory. Otherwise the fringe theory in question is creationism, which is clearly notable (in fact it's the first example of a notable fringe theory given in ). So I don't see a reason to exclude notable creationist periodicals – they are fringe, yes, but they are independent of the ''film'' and reliable sources as far as the world of fundamentalist kookery is concerned. That being the case, I think {{u|1990'sguy}} has shown that there is enough coverage for the film to be considered notable. &ndash;&#8239
— User:Joe, 21:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK||WP:NFRINGE||WP:NFRINGE (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)