Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Brancheau
The foregoing keep arguments, including User:JaconaFrere, have it correct.  reads, unlike some element or factor based benchmarks, as a ''weighting'' benchmark. In addition to the death itself, material is available and should be included (I will try to do so in the next few days) that is reasonably distinct from her death itself: subsequently a groundbreaking legal situation arose regarding release or non-disclosure of the SeaWorld surveillance video and the crime scene investigative images.(refs:https://books.google.com/books?id=_SBzAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA98&dq=%22Dawn+Brancheau%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiO7pOY4fvLAhWELyYKHVsADQI4ChDoAQhGMAc#v=onepage&q=%22Dawn%20Brancheau%22&f=false and https://books.google.com/books?id=ppfoBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA105&dq=%22Dawn+Brancheau%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi814u73PvLAhXG4SYKHSasBnIQ6AEIRTAH#v=onepage&q=%22Dawn%20Brancheau%22&f=false) It has been contended that the post-mortem circumstances and legal arguments gave birth to Florida 406.136, passed in 2011.(2nd ref, and 2 others I am working through). This material is not a good fit for the suggested merge-to articles. Whether or not a rename of this article is appropriate need not be decided at AfD and would logically depend on the article situation after the additional content is integrated
— User:FeatherPluma, 05:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:1E (Wikipedia:Notability)