Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definitions of Pogrom
per  and . Before reading this article, I read through Pogrom, which is a well-organized presentation of 1) the etymology of the word "pogrom", 2) the use of the word to describe violence against Jews, with a list of incidents in different times and places, 3) the expansion of the term to apply to violence against non-Jews. Nowhere do I see, as Definitions of Pogrom states, that "There is no academic consensus regarding the definition of the term 'pogrom'". This article appears to be a content fork that really isn't necessary, as I will soon explain. The whole tone of Definitions of Pogrom is wishy-washy and hair-splitting. What's the point? Every Jew knows exactly what a pogrom is. The other "Definitions of" articles, such as those on fascism and terrorism, deal with the nuances of philosophy and expression of the "ism", while this article just reads like a dictionary debate. The article is also limited to the point of view of English-language academic sources. Knowing the broader treatment of The Holocaust|Holocaust studies in Hebrew (language)|Hebrew, I wonder if the Israelis debate the definition of the word "pogrom" as vociferously as the Americans
— User:Yoninah, 20:47, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FORK||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks)