Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Exposure, Ltd. Laboratory
I understand that you are annoyed by the previous |prod deletion and by this nomination and discussion. Nobody is doing this to annoy you, so please don't take it personally. You are encouraged to add eferences|references from eliable sources|reliable, third-party sources that show how this company is notable; you can include off-line media - we're not restricted to internet sources. Please also read |the notability guidelines. Although ther stuff exists|'other stuff exists' isn't a valid argument, your mention of Dwayne's Photo prompted me to look at that article and I see you're correct about the state of the references there - the Wichita Eagle is about the only relevant and reliable source included. However, a brief Google search found http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/30/us/30film.html| this article from The New York Times in fifth position. Nothing like that appeared when I searched for "Double Exposure Ltd. Laboratory", otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation, would we? By the way, I know a fair bit about film photography. ;-)  Cheers
— User:Baffle, 04:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROD||WP:R||WP:R||WP:GNG||WP:O (Wikipedia:Proposed deletion)