Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vp.art
No assertion of notability and no |reliable sources backing-up the assertions made in this article. By way of explanation, Wikipedia is a "tertiary" source of information. That is to say, there a "primary sources" - things that are out there in the real world (works of art, in this case), then there are "secondary sources" - writers and academics who write about the primary sources in reliable newspapers, books or academic journals. Then there are tertiary sources like Wikipedia which draw on the reliable secondary sources. If there are no reliable sources then we cannot have an article on the subject. None of the links in this article fulfil that criterion, and a google search doesn't find any, either. This is not pettiness or censorship - it's one of the core policies of Wikipedia. For more information you should read  and 
— User:AndyJones, 13:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)