Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulāsana
These articles have been around for years"? That's exactly the problem. We have been far too lenient with this sort of thing. People dump some random text off the top of their head and we preserve it for years and years, afraid to get rid of it lest it ''could potentially'' have some unidentified factual or encyclopedic kernel. That's not how it works at all. Either fix the article ''now'', or delete it. It can always be recreated ''iff'' proper references ar given and  is met.  doesn't cut it. The burden of establishing notability lies entirely with whoever wishes to keep a given article. The default solution is redirection or deletion.  In the case of this asana cruft, this means: if the term can be substantiated as the name of an asana and nothing more, delete it and create a redirect it to List of yoga postures. Proving that a term exists falls very short of establishing that we need a standalone article about it. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. ANy time you wish to bring such an article to "reasonable standard", you are certainly welcome to go ahead. As long as nobody does, Wikipedia will be better off with this stuff gone and clean redirects to a list of asanas
— User:Dbachmann, 16:27, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTE||WP:OTHERCRAP (Wikipedia:Notability)