Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PureVPN
Remove from the list of sources all of those that make money from that review and we do not have something that meets . Explore the links a little more -- they're affiliate links. That's part of why VPNs and other similar services get so many reviews -- it's not just consumer interest; it's kickbacks. Could they still be neutral reviews? Sure, but how can we tell? If there's an affiliate link in there, I don't think we can consider it independent. Eastmain above specifically referenced MacUpdate and PCMAG. https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/52417/purevpn# MacUpdate is... far, far, far from acceptable. Far from an "in-depth review from a reliable source," It's basically a copy/pasted list of features from the company itself. https://www.pcmag.com/review/350623/purevpn-for-android PCMag has, bigger than everything else at the top, the logo and three affiliate links. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 13:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)