Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presenter
or '''DAB''' (secondary): Not notable. One reference (a glossary) for a 492 word article means there is a lot of |original research or Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing|close paraphrasing. I am continually amazed when I see someone !voting "keep" and commenting SOFIXIT. "If" notability is contested by one it is silly to then comment there is notability (with one reference) so anyone !voting delete needs to fix the article. This seems like a two-way street
— User:Otr500, 03:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)