Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Gänshirt
all four "keep" votes above come from the same single-purpose account that has done nothing aside from comment on this discussion. I do not believe the subject meets the notability criteria at . The idea that Tools for Ideas is a well-known work is simply not true. Google results are extremely sparse. It should also be noted that the Tools for Ideas page was created by another single-purpose account and is promotional in tone. Lastly, that the subject worked as a project architect and contributed to major projects does not establish notability through  - in any architecture firm there are many project architects that have a hand in many major works, yet few project architects have actually received the depth of coverage in secondary sources to warrant a Wikipedia page. This subject also has not. The numerous single-purpose accounts and promotional  pages surrounding him smells of a case of using Wikipedia for advertising, contrary to our policies on |neutral point of view and |what Wikipedia is not. Ganshirt himself made a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Christian_G%C3%A4nshirt few fledgling edits to Wikipedia mere days before Tools for Ideas was created by the SPA. I suspect a case of of self-promotion through a web of sockpuppets. Here is a list of SPAs (or near-SPAs) surrounding the subject that may be socks
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:ARTSPAM||WP:NPOV||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)