Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of commonly available chemicals (2nd nomination)
This list-based article has almost all notable entries with their own article and so satisfies  as a valid standalone list; non-notable entries can be deleted. It is a nagivation aid with useful summaries and is valid as such, per . The inclusion criteria are not precise, but are reasonable in the sense that editors can discuss marginal entries and come to consensus on whether to include them. We have plenty of lists with imprecise inclusion criteria, e.g., List of philosophical concepts, and our category system is full of them. Hence "imprecise inclusion criteria" criticsm by itself is not a compelling reason for deletion. A well-formed list article with no major problems suggests keep. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
— User:Mark, 14:29, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SAL||WP:CLN (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)