Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MathOverflow
The nomination statement seems to imply that a subject cannot be notable if it is related to something else notable, untrue and a completely bogus application of . And Alexa Rank is almost completely irrelevant for Wikipedia notability. The article as nominated already contained multiple in-depth sources in published reliable sources (the Atlantic and Mercury News sources) as well as multiple additional sources that are self-published but still reliable by virtue of the "recognized expert" clause of  (blog posts from famous mathematicians). I just added two more peer-reviewed academic papers that are about the subject (they both have it in their titles). Clear pass of 
— User:David, 20:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:SPS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)