Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhub communications
Of the provided sources, most appear to be press releases or are from non-Reliable Sources. There are a few that appear legitimate but minor. The http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2010/07/12/daily40.html Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal reports on a collaboration with another, larger company. The http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09172/978709-467.stm Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and http://www.pcmag.com/business/article/turbomeeting-appliance-offers PC Magazine items are puzzlers in that they appear to have been written by journalists at the publications, but are written in a totally boosterish, press-release-ish tone. Basically this doesn't add up to much in the way of notability per . And given the history of repeated spamming documented by Allistair, I still favor delete and possibly salt. (And given the above history, has anyone done a whois search on the current SPA, Happysantacruz
— User:MelanieN, 14:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COMPANY (Wikipedia:Notability)