Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Scanlan (logic historian)
Since it was suggested I read rof, I went back and read it again.  I still stand by my deletion rationale as the first bullet point under rof#General notes says: "It is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject."  As I said in my nomination statement there are no reliable, independent sources in the article and in my searches I couldn't find any reliable, independent sources to add to the article
— User:GB, 12:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:P||WP:P (Wikipedia:Portal)