Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca S. Snyder
The reasoning, as I understand it, is that there seem to be no references to the subject of the article apart from her connection to a single case for which she is one of the co-counsels.  The only references that mention her outside the context of the Khadr case are directories of attorneys (where she can be found alongside all the other lawyers in the U.S.A.).  While the Khadr case is certainly worthy of an article, |notability is not inherited and it does not follow that one of his attorneys is notable enough to have an article without some notability of her own unconnected to the Khadr case.  Another issue facing this article is that it looks like a wp:coatrack|coatrack for Khadr.  Use of POV language like "captive" rather than the actual designation "detainee" or even the vulgate "prisoner"; there was even an unattributed pull quote dropped willy-nilly into the middle section.  None of that has any place in an encyclopedia
— User:L0b0t, 01:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ITSA (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)