Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul LaViolette
As he is a fringe scientist  and  are probably more relevant than , which is aimed more at orthodox academics. There was a certain amount of media attention for the legal case that arose when LaViolette was fired from the Patent Office for his fringe beliefs: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16722546.400-feedback.html http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/284/5418/1254 http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?filepath=/dailyfed/0800/081100lb.htm http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-1553809/Cold-fusion-confusion-the-Equal.html etc. But these are almost completely unrelated to the content of the present article, and 1E would apply to an article based only on these sources
— User:David, 03:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Notability)