Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamal Benslama
The huge number of co-authors on most or all of his papers renders our most common means of measuring academic impact (citation counts and h-index etc) meaningless, and I don't see any other  criterion for which we have any evidence. There is a little bit of popular press for his research http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/images/story.html?id=65def1af-d538-4fe3-b524-44f61abd91cd http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/story/2010/12/03/sk-regina-big-bang-1011.html?ref=rss (which is why I'm only weakly in favor of deletion) but both just mention him as being part of 2000- or 3000-scientist teams, which again doesn't do much to pick him out of the crowd
— User:David, 23:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)