Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher)
I don't see anything in  which defines the notability of a researcher by the notability of their employer or publication; that seems to me to be a definition of notability based more on importance, which is explicitly rejected by . Even if the publications are clearly notable, as in this case, notability is not inherited.  I'm also surprised by the suggestion that Young is the "main subject editor for a major subject for Gallup": I can find no mention of supercentenarians on Gallup's website, and Young is not listed on http://www.gallup.com/corporate/19318/Gallup-Senior-Scientists.aspx Gallup's list of senior scientists, and I see no evidence that this "a major subject for gallup". A google search for http://www.google.co.uk/search?&q=%22Robert+Young%22+site%3Agallup.com "Robert Young" site:gallup.comthrows up only one trivial result which goes no indication as to Robert Young|which of many possible Robert Youngs it means
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 16:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)