Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticisms of Harry Reid (3rd nomination)
A  usually entails disagreement over content. I don't see objections to specific content at the article, nor at Harry Reid. I might remind everyone "do not refer to forks as 'POV' except in extreme cases of persistent disruptive editing." Reid is certainly controversial enough for an article such as this, and there is too much sourced material to just delete it all. However, I would make a few changes... I suggest that the article be renamed and content added to balance the article. Remember: "It could be that the fork was a good idea, but was approached without balance
— User:Lionelt, 23:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:Content forking)