Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jurassic Park IV (2nd nomination)
Consensus is not merely a nice thing to try to do, but a bedrock foundation of Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Consensus is marked as official policy. As the policy states, '''"This does not mean that Wikipedia ignores precedent; for example, editors should not continuously nominate an article to WP:AFD until it reaches their preferred outcome. However, an issue that was decided in the past can always be discussed again, especially if there is new information to discuss."''' While the exact words are not used, this would be a rather clear ban on double jeopardy, placing a very strong burden of proof on a nominator seeking to take a second (or third, or fourth...) shot at deleting an article that was closed as a '''Keep''' in the past. otability#Notability requires objective evidence and does not expire|otability (a mere guideline) states that '''"Notability requires objective evidence and does not expire.... If a topic once satisfied these guidelines, it continues to satisfy them over time."''' Given that the previous AfD ended in a clear consensus to keep and given that no new information has been provided to undermine that consensus, it would seem that this AfD is a rather clear violation of 
— User:Alansohn, 15:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:CONSENSUS (Wikipedia:Notability)