Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Older Office Lady: Using Her Seductive Tongue
Perhaps the most important false statement in the nomination, and in some Delete votes, is that this film does not pass . It most certainly ''does'' pass per Wikipedia:Notability_(films)#General_principles, "The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking." This is noted, "This criterion is secondary. Most films that satisfy this criterion already satisfy the first criterion." (First criterion: "The film is widely distributed and has received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.") This note, in my experience, is correct, as I have stated above. As indicated by this notable award, these films ''are'' covered by reviews and secondary sources, but because of the barriers of language, Japanese sourcing availability, and distance, these sources are found more slowly than are their English equivalents. Also, these films ''are'' distributed nationally through OP Eiga, 50 years history as perhaps ''the'' major pink film studio. This latter fact further passes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(films)#Other_evidence_of_notability, "The film was successfully distributed domestically in a country that is not a major film producing country, and was produced by that country's equivalent of a "major film studio." Articles on such a film should assert that the film in question was notable for something more than merely having been produced, and if any document can be found to support this, in any language, it should be cited." OP is a major studio, and the award is proof beyond its "merely having been produced". There is no valid reason to delete this article
— User:Dekkappai, 20:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTFILM (Wikipedia:Notability)