Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Andrzejewski
Too soon, if at all.  Person with no political office and no evidence that he will make the primary.  Article is substantially like a campaign press release, complete with Wikipedia:Wikipuffery|wikipuffery like "entrepreneur", the implication that he could have retired at 37 without any financial records in evidence, claims of "national attention" from a magazine that itself is non-notable, crowing about "measurable accomplishments" because some county put its check register online, etc.  Even if subject were notable by now, this article would need to be reduced to  or totally rewritten to meet  and .  And it seems reasonable to conclude that "significant coverage" in criteria means sources from which coverage is a sign of notability.  Merely being able to fill space is a different story: making one's own media availability a full-time job is not notable (unless one leaks a sex tape and gets a TV show, but that has only worked for females so far).  And Wikipedia is for people who ''are'' already notable (see specifically ), not those who someone thinks |ought to be or |are destined to be notable
— User:Closeapple, 11:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:STUB||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NPOV||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Stub)