Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontario Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce
Given the accusations of homophobia being flung around, I'm going to preface this with a reminder that I'm a gay man myself. But gay topics do not get an automatic notability freebie on Wikipedia just because the word gay is involved — notability still has to be properly demonstrated through the use of |reliable source coverage. But as written, this depends almost entirely on |primary sources like the organization's own press releases and its own |self-published website. Literally just ''one'' reference here (''Globe and Mail'', #2) counts for ''anything'' toward notability — but it's a ''blurb'', which means it would be an acceptable source amid a ''mix'' of acceptable sources but it can't ''carry'' the organization over  all by itself as the article's ''only'' acceptable source. Sure, the organization probably would qualify for a more substantive and better sourced article than this — but none of the sourcing present here gets it over ORG as written. No prejudice against draftifying, to give the creator a chance to make it ''better'' than this — but this, as written, is neither substantive enough nor referenced well enough to earn inclusion as things stand right now, and there's no homophobia required to reach that conclusion
— User:Bearcat, 21:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)