Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Shapiro (second nomination)
It seems to me that a content dispute (Jance may want to use {{tl|totallydisputed}} ...) that has not been resolved through channels is spilling over into AFD. Shapiro seems to turn up as an example in some national news stories about aggressive legal advertising practices, thin notability indeed, but potential to pass. The major problem seems to be a bunch of original research drawn from case documents that is unsupported by citations and that violates #Undue weight. The nomination is not really drawing on policy but is more of a rant. I believe I'd vote weak keep on notability and insist that the editors solve the content issues |some other way
— User:Dhartung, 19:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:DR (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)