Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Qualls
per the articles brought to the table in the arguments above. I also disagree with the argument above that "This article has clear tones of a personal LinkedIn page because it only focuses with what she herself would advertise to clients and that is always enough for deletion, regardless of what could be said." I personally don't see the usefulness of  when a quick chopping to stub size would suffice perfectly fine, only take a few extra minutes, and leaves the topic in place so that less-experienced editors like IPs can add to it over time, without the hurdle of page creation
— User:Yvarta, 01:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)