Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aro gTér
There was no  for the article as it was when this AfD was posted - only primary sources by the founders of the tradition, websites associated with Aro gTer, and a couple of tertiary sources which only repeat what Aro gTér says about itself were used as sources (other than for a few parts which really had nothing to do with the subject of the article). Since then someone has removed the junk and effectively made the article into a stub (which is better than it was). If the article is kept, then it should not get filled up up with all that junk again. Just leave more or less as is until some good quality reliable secondary sources appear (which, if the subject is notable, they should). But meanwhile, in the absence of such sources, I don't think the subject really meets notability guidelines. Currently there are no reliable independent sources that actually examine and discuss Aro gTér in a meaningful way - only a couple of tertiary sources with brief, rather insignificant, entries that do nothing more than summarize or repeat a few things Aro gTér says about itself
— User:CFynn, 12:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)