Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becky Smith (academic)
It's a  subject, so we need extra care about making sure we have mainstream sources rather than ones that take a fringe point of view. In that respect, the quote from her in the one independent source we have (a local newspaper story) saying that she considers herself a skeptic is reassuring. And assuming that she does take that point of view, I don't see why the "dubious scientific value" of her research should be relevant — she appears to be more a historian of local folklore than a scientist. Nevertheless, we have no evidence of passing  and a local newspaper story doesn't go very far towards passing 
— User:David, 18:40, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)