Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nontrinitarianism
If I may jump in... Antaeus, I think your original comment in this sub-discussion here might be considered to be violation of , , and .  I see no evidence whatsoever that the nomination was in any way malformed or in bad faith. My personal opinion is that its a good nomination, and in fact I boted to merge the article. It's true that the information in the article should not just be thrown away, but a merge consensus is often a good and appropriate result of an article brought to attention via AfD. I also don't see why a new editor cannot lurk for a while and begin her editing career in AfD, if that is the path she chooses, and as long as her nominations are made in good faith and are properly formed, as here
— User:Herostratus, 12:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:BITE||WP:NPA (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)