Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economy of the Caribbean
while I don't disagree with the nominator's analysis, those aren't really reasons to delete the article; they are |problems that can probably be fixed. The question, in my mind, is whether or not the ''subject'' is |notable or not. I don't think there would be much argument, surely? It should be possible to create a well-sourced article with a comprehensive timeline covering the economy of the Caribbean from Spanish settlement through to a modern tourism-based economy. What the nominator seems to be arguing for is a  deletion which I can seem some justification for, but I think securing some support for a clean-up effort would be a better course of action
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 09:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM||WP:N||WP:BLOWITUP (Wikipedia:Editing policy)