Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dingonek
this is a ''clear'' delete. There appears to be essentially nothing (as discussed above) to establish notability. From , "A fringe subject (a fringe theory, organization or aspect of a fringe theory) is considered notable enough for a dedicated article if it has been referenced extensively, and in a serious and reliable manner, by major publications that are independent of their promulgators and popularizers", and cryptozoology proponents like Coleman, Shuker, or Heuvelmans are in no sense independent for the purposes of establishing notability. They are definitely fringe. Which leaves us with the  primary source and a couple of "news of the weird" offhand repetitions of that primary source
— User:Tronvillain, 18:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)