Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Telehealth Service Providers (2nd nomination)
I've created this loooong ago when I didn't know much about . While the mention is in passing, the source does call it a 'major tele m/h organization." Some of its surveys from ~15 years ago or so are cited in a number of works, but there is no in-depth coverage of the organization. Some of the best 'in-passing' mentions: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/tmj.2008.0121?casa_token=2FE5dYT587AAAAAA:zdANOiR1eC4YsOZYR4-CZm5qPhwdNrOO3H967_WN_DEqQ8zFtVRfE6CjWSnFjVZv2Tu96TQVxsOtRCg This source found through GScholar mentions it in passing: "The major tele- medicine and telehealth organizations, such as the ATA and the Association of Telehealth Service Providers, continue to direct lobbying efforts toward these issues."  https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=ytGQrJaXgqoC&pg=PA311&dq=%22Association+of+Telehealth+Service+Providers%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwis0qqkuf_iAhVmyIsBHTPlCfQQ6AEINDAC states "Lobbying efforts by the American Telemedicine Association and the Association of Telehealth Service Providers, groups representing the industry, have strongly influenced changes in US federal telehealth reimbursement policy. " Overall, that doesn't seem to suffice to rescue this article. I guess it can be mention in passing in some other articles, but there's probably not enough information about it to cobble more than 2-3 sentences, so hardly enough to argue it is notable. And if their website is inactive, this only suggests that whatever they were doing, they either failed or succeeded, so no new sources will discuss it unless one day some historian publishes more research into this org and its significance. But until this happens, they are probably not an organization worth having their own encyclopedic page
— User:Piotrus, 11:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NORG (Wikipedia:Notability)