Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
I just added nine |reliable sources and expanded the article a bit. Some of the references ''use'' the sentence instead of ''discussing'' the sentence (and are included in the article to show various ways the sentence is used), but overall, I think notability is established.  If you want more, try looking through the 99 Gbooks hits for http://books.google.com/books?as_q=&num=10&lr=&as_brr=0&as_pt=ALLTYPES&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Had+had+had+had+had+had+had+had+had+had+had&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_brr=0&as_pt=ALLTYPES&lr=&as_vt=&as_auth=&as_pub=&as_sub=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&as_isbn=&as_issn= "Had had had had had had had had had had had". I am very much in agreement with Uncle G's comment above that this is part of a wider subject of Repetition in linguistics, and would be equally satisfied if this is merged to an article like that. —&nbsp
— User:LinguistAtLarge, 06:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)