Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Andrews
To be fair, this article was started in 2008, when she was still the ''active'' candidate in her district and hadn't been relegated back to "placeholder" status yet. But a candidate doesn't qualify for a Wikipedia article just for being a candidate — she has to ''win'' the election, not just run in it, to be considered notable as a politician, and apart from that the only other way to get a candidate in the door is to demonstrate and |reliably source that she qualifies for an article for some other reason ''besides'' her candidacy itself. But this makes no such claim at all: notability is |not inherited, so she doesn't qualify just because her husband was a congressman, and there's no strong or well-sourced evidence that her work as a lawyer passes our notability standards for lawyers. Even under the incredibly lax standards of 2008, when in actual practice we ''did'' frequently let articles stand on candidacy alone far more often than we should have, this article should never have survived her ''withdrawal'' from the race
— User:Bearcat, 16:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)