Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Creation Society (2nd nomination)
I'm sympathetic to the issue that even for major professional societies, finding independent coverage can be difficult. But the only things in the article that resemble claims of significance are "it has notable members" and "it filed an amicus brief in someone else's lawsuit". That's not close to enough for notability of the society itself. And the failure of the sources to pass  (or even provide any nontrivial coverage of the subject rather than attempts at  notability via its members' accomplishments) has been amply discussed above. The strong pattern of promotionalism, COI editing, defiance of and wikilawyering of the consensus on the past AfD, and canvassing shown here is also highly troubling, making it unlikely that we can ever have a properly neutral article and fully justifying the suggestion that this be protected against recreation
— User:David, 00:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:INHERITED (Wikipedia:Notability)