Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Beale (5th nomination)
Excellent point, Vesal.  My reading is the same as yours--I think  is met.  As to EALacey's points, he appears to read in new, non-existent criteria: a) suggesting we have to in greater particularity describe NB's ''specific'' contributions to his most notable/co-written book, as though "co-writer" status is insufficient; b) that those contributions have to be a ''major theme'' in the commentary; and c) the book must have led to more coverage of NB's biography than the coverage we see here.  Those simply aren't part of the guideline.  NB meets the guideline.  As to my reflecting in the article elements of NB's career outside of his co-authored book, which are reported in a number of RSs, that's appropriate material for a bio.  It's not necessary that each such aspect be ''itself'' notable enough to warrant an article.  If the subject is notable, and has written additional books, or had his career as a consultant or writer covered in other RSs, or written other books, all of which are covered in RSs, that's perfectly appropriate for coverage in his article.  In fact, its normal course on wp
— User:Epeefleche, 17:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)