Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The UKA Press (2nd nomination)
I'm sympathetic to the cause of small presses. They are underdogs in a world run by Amazon destroying the fabric of book culture (long story). It really pains me to see small presses deleted from Wikipedia, one more freaking thing right? Amazon ahoy. The problem is though once something reaches AfD, it has to meet the guidelines of . That means, multiple reliable sources ''about'' the company itself. This is IMO a very high bar for certain types of companies: magazines, small publishing imprints and press, small companies. We have seen it over and over on AfD. At this point there is not much that can be done if there are no reliable sources. I recommend whenever you can try to get some press exposure for the press itself, a journalistic story or two ''about'' the press, not just the products the press produces. At some point I would like to see rules that allow for products to influence the notability of the producer but right now it doesn't seem to be the case (see last sentence of 
— User:Green, 20:52, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:PRODUCT (Wikipedia:Notability)