Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Godling Chronicles
I did search and while I found two local articles about the series, I didn't actually find anything (else) that would really be usable as a reliable source. The closest I found to a RS was http://forewordliterary.com/tag/the-godling-chronicles/ this link, which was written by someone http://forewordliterary.com/2014/08/breathing-new-life-into-a-bestselling-series/ representing the author so it'd be considered a  source. As I suspected, all of the reviews for this series have been written by various book review blogs, so they've be considered . The thing about SPS is that while they might be well written or entertaining or popular, none of that makes the SPS a reliable source per Wikipedia's guidelines. It's fairly rare that we have a blog that would be considered an exception to this rule and we don't really have any in this instance
— User:Tokyogirl79, 07:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:SPS (Wikipedia:No original research)