Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center (3rd)
The article documents a social phenomenon - that of the facts of the hypothesis and the existence of the hypothesis.  It does not argue for the hypothesis, nor does it argue against it.  It simply, correctly and competently documents it as a hypothesis that exists.  The topic is suitable for encyclopaedic coverage and the article simply gives it that.  There was a certain inevitability that, as soon as a eer Review was asked for, someone would take the opportunity to propose it for deletion.  There is no issue with that since an AfD is, in many ways, a review process.  However it is important to make the distinction between the article which documents the demolitionists' hypothesis, which this handles correctly, and the hypothesis itself.  A correct and encyclopaedic article, which this strives to be, documents that citable facts of the existence of the hypothesis without either validating or invalidating that hypothesis.  The article needs to be judged on the merits of how it handles the topic - a notable, well reported topic - not on the merits of the various opinions people have about the truth or otherwise behind the destruction of the buildings
— User:Timtrent, 22:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:P (Wikipedia:Portal)