Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back In Time (software)
The argument above is , but I think it meets . There's plenty of coverage about it in reliable sources in its field, including http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/70728.html Linux Insider, http://lifehacker.com/5212899/back-in-time-does-full-linux-backups-in-one-click Lifehacker and http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/backup-restore-data-and-files-easily-time-linux/ MakeUseOf. My reservation is that it doesn't seem to meet , which requires it to be discussed as significant in its field. I don't think it's discussed as significant in the above articles, just as a useful piece of software. It's a close one, but I believe there's barely enough coverage
— User:Batard0, 07:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOHARM||WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)