Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singh Is Bliing
per meeting applicable |inclusion criteria.  Filming has begun (finished actually) and MOS:FILM#Production|production has the |coverage to meet F|F (paragraph 3).  Even https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh_Is_Bliing&type=revision&diff=683142321&oldid=683141990 when nominated the article's sourcing reflected this. Sorry {{u|Samtar|nominator}}, this was not the best AFD nomination. And nice to invoke , but that policy does not say we cannot have forward-looking articles, and it instructs that they must be well and properly sourced and avoid unverifiable statements: {{tq|"All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, ''if'' discussion is properly referenced
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 21:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:NFF||WP:CBALL (Wikipedia:Notability)