Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlene A. Eilers Koenig
As discussed, a subject doesn't have a right to demand that she's not included because criticism of Wikipedia|she doesn't like Wikipedia, Wikipedia doesn't need her permission, and there will be a discussion here.   There are a lot of links to the article, which suggest that she's being used as a .  As such, it may be worthwhile to help explain the source, especially if the source is her blog. A widely published and cited author, I'd lean towards '''keep''' actually
— User:Barney, 18:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SOURCE (Wikipedia:Verifiability)