Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So where the bloody hell are you?
at the least for the sake of lack of real reasons for nomination; "too short" is not a reason for deletion (tag it as a stub), and neither is "uses profanity" (or should we delete cunt as well?). While one must |assume good faith, I too am a little nonplussed by this nomination and the one for the article on Peter North (porn star)|Peter North.  It would be a ''keep'' regardless, as it is most certainly notable based on the news mentions provided (and there are certainly more; for what it's worth, I originally found out about this on my sub-par local news on which the anchors consider Oklahoma to be "foreign") and the controversy caused
— User:Kinu, 19:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)