Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken as Things Are
The original status of this article was atrocious, but I've cleaned it up considerably and found some sources. Most of the links on the article are trades, true, but there's one newspaper review in there and then there's http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AT&p_theme=at&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=10B8D7E921FAEDC8&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM this newspaper article where the Google News search asserts has a review for the book as well. I can't verify it through the snippet that this link shows when I actually click on it, so if someone can verify this and then link it to the article, I'd be much obliged. The second newspaper article would definitely push it to a stronger keep for me if it does contain a review. In any case this just barely and I mean '''''barely''''' skims the notability guidelines of . If it was just the trades I'd have voted for a weak delete. I'll probably still try to see if there's merit in creating an article for the author and redirecting there if all else fails. If it does get deleted, I'm willing to userfy a copy to hold on to and work on with the intent of potentially creating an article for the author
— User:Tokyogirl79, 04:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)