Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EPlasty
I'm sorry, but I strongly disagree with the arguments put forward in the last 2 !votes. The !vote by DavidLeighEllis has no basis whatsoever in any policy or guideline. As for the remarks by DGG, I respectfully disagree. The journal is ''not'' boderline. It is not indexed in any selective database. There is not a single |reliable source. As for the argument (also put forward by others above), that being cited in WP shows notability, I couldn't disagree stronger. WP is not and cannot be an indication of notability (if only it's not a ...) Accepting this argument would create a very dangerous precedent. And whether or not the authors who published in this journal are from notable institutions or are notable themselves is immaterial, as |notability is not inherited
— User:Randykitty, 14:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)