Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ology (website)
It being defunct/short-lived isn't really a reason to delete, nor is it having had 4.4 million users a reason to keep. The only relevant question is whether it meets . Based on a review of the article's sources (one press release and a couple primary sources), and some web searches, I would say it does not. Which is kind of a shame, given that it has >50 mainspace links (mostly from articles on TV episodes talking about reviews written on the website). But there just isn't any  that we can use to write a verifiable article that's more than a directory entry
— User:Colin, 16:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)