Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Achúcarro
Did you know that https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ANotability&type=revision&diff=894769618&oldid=894764961 women academics are twice as likely to be nominated for deletion as you would expect from the proportion of women among Wikipedia biographies? This seems to be a case in point. She has huge citation counts, easily passing #C1, and is a member of Academia Europaea, passing #C3. The source in the article from the NWO (the Dutch scientific funding agency) with her name in the title is in-depth, reliable, and independent, so that nomination claim is false too. https://www.ondacero.es/programas/julia-en-la-onda/audios-podcast/entrevistas/ana-achucarro-parece-muy-logico-pensar-que-haya-vida-otros-planetas_20140611553fea060cf21d2cb1b44905.html This, https://www.elcultural.com/noticias/buenos-dias/Ana-Achucarro/2505 this, and https://culturacientifica.com/2015/08/30/un-universo-inesperado-por-ana-achucarro/ this also look like usable sources. Bad nomination
— User:David, 05:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)