Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Rage
I found some sources http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0706430/biohttp://www.imdb.com/name/nm0706430/ and brief mentions of him in two books https://books.google.com/books?id=PwwN5BInAucC&pg=PA335&lpg=PA335&dq=%22Christopher+Rage%22+actor&source=bl&ots=KMTgynBYui&sig=N5rwN_LN61YE_On3V_FC_M1M7OM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAzgKahUKEwia4uqr67jIAhVKlIgKHU3YBpQ#v=onepage&q=Christopher%20Rage&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=yRsYON5rFiYC&pg=PA113&lpg=PA113&dq=Christopher+Rage+actor&source=bl&ots=1_QA1_qh4C&sig=oLZIBAN9bFR6LOGIidkR5eYdHzs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CGQQ6AEwDmoVChMI-M_d5-q4yAIVEaSICh2r7A17#v=onepage&q=Christopher%20Rage&f=false, but this actor fails  and I believe that it fails  as well. GNG assumes notability if the person "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Are there sources? Yes. Secondary, independent, and reliable sources? Yes. But... is there ''significant coverage''? ...significant coverage that "addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content?" The answer to this is '''no'''. Absolutely not. The sources I found outside of IMDB were simple mentions of his name in two novels about gay pornographic films and acting; they did not significantly cover him in-depth. In fact, they didn't cover him much at all. I took a look at both of the Google Books sources provided by
— User:Wikiuser20102011, 21:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)