Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deletionist versus Inclusionist Controversy
but cut it down a good deal to resolve issues of wp:original research|original research. This has received significant news coverage and attention, so it is definitely |notable. If written properly, it can wp:avoid self-references|avoid self-references, so this should be a reason for cleanup rather than deletion. And in response to the nominator's reason for deletion, have you read 
— User:Pyrospirit, 02:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:CAPITALIZEDGIBBERISH (Wikipedia:Notability)