Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Radusky
most of the deleted content was not focussing on Radusky, but on a |coatrack-y listing of projects he was involved in as architect - with lots of irrelevant details. Radusky is only mentioned in passing in his obvious role as architect, none of the sources offers additional relevant biographical information. The general problem with the underlying certification process is sufficiently mentioned in Self-Certification (New York City Department of Buildings), but a Wiki-article should not serve as a directory or "list of shame" of such incidents without sufficient topic-related context. On a sidenote, several other related articles have also been edited in an apparent attempt to raise more awareness for these problems in New York City ( applies). Removing these coatrack details, the remaining content and sources ''directly about Radusky'' are not sufficient to establish notability
— User:GermanJoe, 17:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTADVOCACY (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)