Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SharkSSL
Well, here's an "unbiased" editor, such as Sorisen demands, and I find his arguments unpersuasive.  He would be better served adding |reliable sources conferring the significant coverage ''about the subject''  requires to the article, devoid of promotional/press release content explicitly debarred by the relevant guidelines, instead of mudslinging and ''ad hominem'' attacks, a standard tactic of editors lacking substantive arguments.  (Honestly, does ''anyone'' glare at his terminal and think, "I have found a random editor, and despite knowing nothing about him and never having had dealings with him before, I somehow must hate him and wish him ill!  Death to his articles!")  I could find no such sources myself
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']], 03:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)