Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pegasus (roller coaster)
into the article for the park. The unsubstantiated claim that it costs millions is great, but sources would be better. Many things that cost millions of dollars get their articles routinely deleted, such as minor shopping malls, libraries, or college dorms. At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes I can't find any note that all amusement park rides have been found to ne notable enough for articles in previous AFDs. In the meantime, merge all such stub articles into the article for the amusement park which contains them. If the section on the ride becomes too large (with refs satisfying ) for the article on the park, then and only then split it off. As for it being "permanent" tell that to the rides at Opryland USA or Riverview Park.  Even at parks which are still in operation, rides are regularly replaced. There is no guideline I can find which says all amusement park rides are inherently notable. To have an article, it should meet  or perhaps . The sole source for these rides so far is www.rcdb.com, which appears to be a fan site, and one might question whether it satisfies  and . It has undated, unsigned notes about the ride, although it does list names of the site creator and editors. It is still not "multiple
— User:Edison, 00:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:A||WP:N||WP:ORG||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Attribution)