Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene Zundel
albeit reluctantly. Of the notable sources (those that have their own Wikipedia article), the El Pais source is OK. The article in El Universal (Mexico City)|El Universal El Universal is not about the subject, but about the opening of the Cultural Institute in the Mexican Embassy in Berlin, and she receives only a mention. The es:Periódico Vanguardia|Vanguardia source is massively misleading, because it suggest she participated in the Venice Biennale. That would pretty much establish notability instantly, if only it were true. Her work is shown during the event in a parallel exhibition that is not affiliated with the Venice Biennale and its curators. She did not represent Mexico at the 57th Biennale, that was Carlos Amorales. El Siglo de Torreón has got their biennials mixed up and can't tell the difference between the Venice and the Florence Biennale (one is REALLY important, the other a scam). La Jornada writes about the same exhibition as Vanguardia, but has it about right. In summary, there are two articles in independent reliable sources that are usable. This meets the GNG, then only by the slimmest of margins. It fails  in almost every conceivable way and really ought to be completely rewritten to address the gross errors and misstatements in the sources
— User:Vexations, 21:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Notability)