Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay Valley Foods
The major issue here is not presentation. The material on pollution is a textbook example of '''|original research'''. No notable secondary sources are cited: the page explicitly presents primary sources, and draws its own conclusions. (Look for sentence beginning "''Therefore, this facility''".) The source for visible smoke plumes is an email address. The guidelines advise that articles should be based mainly on secondary sources; this helps ensure notability and neutrality. This page is making an argument, not just presenting information. With OR material removed, there's nothing left but a list of products, which is an advertisement. The page fails . ''&mdash
— User:Duae_Quartunciae, 14:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:No original research)