Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constant Rijkenberg
per BLP1E and in line with most other !votes. Especially considering the other editors commenting here have no problem with placing a poker player under  (I agree with them), closing admin should note that it's persons accepting enough of this definition who are participating which implies people more familiar in these specific areas. Actually, the discussion of other EPT winners that have articles all having additional claims of notability almost makes a case for a 'Delete' on its own as it implies an unofficial consensus. With guideline concerns listed completely valid and any case for a keep long since during irrational and completely out of the scope of Wikipedia processes, I don't have anything to sway across. As for the ''proxy voting'' mentioned above in a panic, that's not for discussion here, but per  it's almost certain to be looked into after it's been brought up. Sorry
— User:Datheisen, 13:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATHLETE||WP:BEANS (Wikipedia:Notability)