Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2/1 game forcing
I don't play bridge, so I can't make any sense of it. People who understand the jargon don't need it, people who don't understand the jargon can't use it. Per , the same policy as , supported by MOS:JARGON. Anything that's worth keeping here belongs in Contract bridge#Game strategy
— User:Jacknstock, 05:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTJARGON||WP:NOTHOWTO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)