Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orly Taitz (2nd nomination)
My arguments at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_July_31 the DRV for the nomination apply with equal force here. I won't recapitulate at length what is already available with one click, by a summary is appropriate.  and  cut strongly against articles for people whose notability stems ''only'' from a single event. The arguments for BLP1E's inapplicability are not persuasive, and even if they were, SINGLEEVENT picks up the slack. When both are taken together, they overwhelm. Taitz's notability rests entirely on her involvement in litigating the President's citizenship; "event" can and should be read broadly to deem that one event. Just as playing in one baseball game is one event, no matter how many pitches one throws or balls one hits during that game, filing multiple lawsuits that are functionally identical is also ''one event''. It's the ''game'' that is the event, not the ''plays'', and Taitz's can be covered adequately at Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories. She is not independently notable and doesn't merit her own article.- Simon Dodd
— User:Simon, 01:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)