Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Series (record label)
I looked at the references and thank you for providing them. The https://www.prothomalo.com/entertainment/article/1598894/%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%87%E0%A6%9F%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%AA%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%A5%E0%A6%AE-%E0%A6%85%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A5%E0%A6%A6%E0%A6%A3%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A1-%E0%A6%9C%E0%A6%BF-%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%9C%E0%A6%95%E0%A7%87 1st reference fails  as it has no accredited journalist as the author. Leaving that aside, the reference fails  as it says almost nothing about the company itself. If the case was a milestone though, perhaps there are other articles that provide a more in-depth profile of the company? https://www.jagonews24.com/entertainment/news/412646 The 2nd reference also fails  for having no accredited journalist as the author. Leaving that aside, it also appears that this website requests users to write articles and provides a gmail address. This also raises alarm bells and I would argue for this reason, this article fails . The https://www.kalerkantho.com/online/entertainment/2019/06/10/778242 3rd reference also has no accredited journalist as the author of the article and fails . The reference also fails  as it contains no details about the company. The book reference contains a single reference and also fails  as it contains no in-depth details about the company. While I have no doubt this label exists, in order to meet the criteria for establishing notability, at least two references must exist that provide Independent Content (as defined in ) and in-depth information
— User:HighKing, 18:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)