Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tons of Fun University
One very pertinent issue Dan raises in the problem of genre. There are specific sub-guidelines of  because a musician, an author, and a corporate figure are treated differently by the press - there are different types and volume of press coverage, different benchmarks of achievement, etc, and so more specific  guidelines have been created for each. However, not all articles will fit into one of the established categories, and when this happens it's necessary to use some common sense. I would suggest that because of this particular group's emphasis on spoken word and poetry, their work could also be considered to somewhat overlap with what would normally be covered with , which has less specific "press coverage" requirements, which this group easily meets. Furthermore, within usic the group also has become a "prominent representative of a notable style" (7) even if that style is more avant-garde, "won or placed in a major music competition " (9) (if we consider major poetry slams music competitions - again, an overlap of categories is evident here), and has certainly been mentioned in enough independent published works to at least approach requirement (1). Again, however, I emphasize that the  guidelines can only be just that, guidelines, especially for this case
— User:Orphic, 13:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N||WP:FICTION||WP:M||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)