Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhoda Jenkins
Per  which states ''"If a subject under discussion is independently notable, provide the evidence to show that''" and "''Ordinarily, a relative of a celebrity should only have their own independent article if and when it can be reliably sourced that they have done something significant and notable in their own right, and would thereby merit an independent article even if they didn't have a famous relative.''", merge any useful content of the article into Harriot Eaton Stanton Blatch and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. All sources I've found lack "''significant coverage''" stated in the  as ''"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content.'' I cant find any source that covers her directly in http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Rhoda+Jenkins%22 here and http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Rhoda+Barney+Jenkins%22 here, which are google book results for Rhoda Jenkins and Rhoda Barney Jenkins, which are discussed previously. I cant even find a single source where she alone received significant coverage, apart from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0DEEDC113AF934A3575AC0A9619C8B63 this sad news. I'll be more than happy if someone can point a source that covers her accomplishments
— User:Nimuaq, 04:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)