Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (2nd nomination)
per .  Irrespective of the avolitional nature of his notoriety (toward which Allen properly and persuasively adduces the counterexamples of Chelsea Clinton and George P. Bush), that notability exists, if only in view of the sundry legal problems that have arisen (I assume arguendo that Allen didn't mean to suggest that the fact of the subject's ostensibly having undertaken to be a private person is at all relevant to whether we ought to have an article apropos of him; such suggestions have surely been refuted at, inter al.,  EVIL, the several Daniel Brandt Talk:Daniel Brandt|AfDs, Wikipedia:Wikiethics).  Were he a biographical subject only in view of his being related to a notable personnage, I'd likely think deletion (or redirection to Al Gore) appropriate (as I did, for example, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suri Cruise), if only because of what we'd expect to be an attendant dearth of biographical information.  Sad though I am that the youngest Gore has experienced legal troubles&mdash;after all, I volunteered a great deal on his father's 1996 VP and 2000 Pres campaigns, during the latter of which I had occasion to meet Gore&mdash;those troubles have made him, à la Michael Dellums (a good analogue, I think), notable
— User:Jahiegel, 19:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)