Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Fordyce (2nd nomination)
While it is not impossible to sell lots of records with a remix, it is usually due to the success of the original version which is produced by different people. One only needs to check the alleged Michael Jackson remix to understand why this article has serious and irreparable problems; I found this at http://www.discogs.com/Michael-Jackson-One-More-Chance/release/1858713 Discogs - One Last Chance but the official remix release is http://www.discogs.com/Michael-Jackson-One-More-Chance/release/266344 here. The original version is a totally different CD, one that more importantly, there is no record that it even charted at Billboard. In fact there is nothing on Billboard that gives support to any of the so called "38 Billboard Hits" being claimed. If such scale of success should exist, then this would probably be reflected with a few interviews with reputable magazines per . Also, this amount of success is usually reflected on the Grammy nominations book, it seems strange that not one single nomination was achieved. Remixes, unless the subject if of an indisputable fame (in which case it would be easier to obtain magazine interviews) are usually not a good vehicle to establish notability, much less if they are mp3 downloads
— User:Jrod2, 10:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)