Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newname performance
unless |reliable, independent sources are produced that give |significant coverage to this group.  Individual sources need not be available online, but they should be well-cited and described in detail including quotations within the limit of copyright policy.  In addition, these phrases on the article's talk page concern me very much: "This article was originated by one of the members of the organization who attempted to be as factual as possible" and "It is a first person eyewitness account of historical events".  Those statements indicate that the article has a serious problem with regards to |conflict of interest and |original research.  I fear that these problems are insurmountable in this case, but I will keep an open mind
— User:Cullen328, 07:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:COI||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)