Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Pantagruel
Deletion discussions where |notability has been questioned are not difficult.  It doesn't matter whether you think it's notable or I think it's not notable.  The only thing that matters is whether or not multiple |reliable sources exist which are |independent of the subject, and which cover the subject in a significant, non-trivial way.  Four things need to be satisfied:  '''multiple''' sources (more than 1), '''reliable''' sources (see  for a definition), '''independent''' sources (see ), and '''significant, non-trivial coverage''' (see ).  These requirements have not been satisfied for this article.  The |number of Google hits you get for searching "The New Pantagruel" is not proof of notability.  If actual reliable sources come to light, I will gladly switch my !vote to Keep.  Until that time, however, the article must be deleted.  A partial merge and redirect might be appropriate, although it's unclear if any of the info in this article can actually be sourced
— User:Snottywong, 23:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS||WP:SEC||WP:RS||WP:SEC||WP:GNG||WP:GHITS (Wikipedia:Notability)