Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CupoNation
Per  and . Beyond sources that cover routine events (like receiving funding, etc), I couldn't find sources that cover this company ''in-depth'', and enough of these sources to assert that ''significant coverage'' exists from secondary |reliable sources (which is enough sources to write a full article without the need for |original research). Hence, I am voting ''delete
— User:Oshwah, 19:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:RS||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Notability)