Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ch interpreter (2nd nomination)
same reasons as before -  wants a knowledgeable source, which takes out the Huber source.  Other editors appear to be arguing that Wang's close associates and even Cheng's papers constitute sources for the sake of notability
— User:Tedickey, 10:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)