Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocentric universe (2nd nomination)
There is an obvious lack of |independent sources that discuss this; the advocates who sit on this article have reverted almost all discussion from independent sources by calling their quality into question (See for example Talk:Biocentric_universe/Archive_2#Removed_unreliable_sources_from_Reception|this talk section; still also https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biocentric_universe&type=revision&diff=753044055&oldid=753038134 this kind of blatantly POV editing, removing an EL critical of the theory and replacing it with a link to another Lanza website, with a fraudulent edit note.)  Just to make that clear --  the advocates' consistent removal of content critical of the notion on the basis that the sources are not reliable sources, just shows how FRINGE this is (there is little to no independent discussion of it in high quality sources), as well as demonstrating that the topic lacks basic notability.  Just look at it - the article is overwhelmingly sourced to refs by Lanza and Berman; there are few solid, '''|independent''' sources with significant discussion
— User:Jytdog, 23:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:INDY||WP:INDY (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)