Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Logic and Analysis
back into Association for Symbolic Logic. It is clearly |not yet notable, being so new.  Because we have not developed specific criteria (such as a rule or guideline) for academic journals, we must rely on |the general guideline.  Wikipedia is only supposed to report what is already notable, not what ought to be notable.  There are a few exceptions of people or places that are ''pre se'' notable, but I know of no regular contributor who advocates having an article for every journal.  The parent organization meets our |notability rules for organizations, so I think we should merge it back there for now.   If you can convince me that  applies, please make your argument now
— User:Bearian, 01:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)