Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Long (entrepreneur)
Yes, it should obviously have been speedied A7. if you look at the contributions of the editor who declined it, there's a clear pattern of failing to apply the "credible" part of the "credible claim of significance or importance" criterion in #A7. One  article after another gets its speedy declined, usually with the edit summary ''"asserts enough significance to survive A7"''. The end result is a sharp increase in the number of pointless, time-wasting AFDs
— User:OnionRing, 05:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CSD||WP:SNOWBALL (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)