Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleveland steamer (third nomination)
It's a dictionary definition, and  a dictionary.  Its source is not useful: an appearance in a radio transcript means nothing:  extends: Wikipedia is not for things made up on the radio one day either.  As a matter of fact, that source PROVES this shouldn't be on Wikipedia.  If you look through it, you'll see that it's quite obvious that the "Cleveland steamer" term was made up by one of the "male cast members" on the spot as some kind of joke; they were having a silly discussion about gross, made up sexual practices.  In fact, merging this with Coprophilia is a bad idea, because this made-up slang term is of absolutely no importance to Coprophilia.  As for this nomination being in "bad faith", I disagree.  I think the nominator wasn't very civil... but there is PLENTY of reason this article should be deleted from wikipedia, so I just don't see bad faith
— User:Mangojuice, 18:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NFT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)