Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue giant (disambiguation)
following the addition of Blue Giant Equipment Corporation to the disambiguation page. Nevertheless, I do not see any reason to trout the nominator for this |good faith nomination. Prior to this addition, there were two topics requiring disambiguation: Blue giant (the primary topic) and Blue Giant (band). ''If'' these two topics had been the ''only'' topics that required disambiguation for the title "blue giant", then the use of hatnotes would be much more useful to readers per . I would support the use of hatnotes rather than a disambiguation page in that scenario. By extension, I would support the deletion of the disambiguation page. That right there is not a content issue—it's a matter which deletion is suitable for: hatnotes vs. dab pages. Now, TWODABS describes a situation where an unnecessary disambiguation page should kept anyway: that is when {{tq|there could '''reasonably''' be other topics ambiguous with the title on Wikipedia now or in the future}} (emphasis added). TWODABS also continues to say that the disambiguation page {{tq|may be deleted if, after a period of time no additional ambiguous topics are found to expand the disambiguation page}}, which seems to confirm that this is a valid reason to delete a dab page
— User:Mz7, 18:37, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:TWODABS (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)