Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C'tan (2nd nomination)
As with the other Warhammer AfD's,  provides a clear guide as to which pages are to be maintained.  If the subject is covered in significant detail in independent sources, it is presumed to be notable (note for the curious, the codexes, works of fiction and White Dwarf magazine are all published by games workshop).  This AfD is not the forum for debate on .  Extraneous and novel methods of determining "notability" that bear no resemblance to the consensus view don't seem very persuasive to me.  The fact that the article fails to abide by  is tangential but indicative of the larger problem of meshing this subject with a real world encyclopedia without some secondary sourcing to anchor it
— User:Protonk, 05:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:WAF (Wikipedia:Notability)