Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arctic MUD (2nd nomination)
God, y'know, |screw all this courtroom drama about whether the evidence is admissible since it's tainted by Usenet cooties: the fact is that Arctic MUD developers publicly contributed a popular and useful socket code patch that corrected a common problem in DikuMUDs, anybody can check this by looking at the rec.games.mud.diku FAQ on faqs.org, there's no reason to suspect any chicanery in any of this, and it's not like this is some kind of crank assertion that we must have Authority From On High to call upon in order to let it in the door.  Further, I assert that this fact is a meaningful indicator toward notability; I personally think that that plus the three passing mentions plus the longevity factor add up to enough notability to work with.  If not, whatever, I'm just sick of the cooties arguments. &mdash
— User:Chaos5023, 15:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)