Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamophobia-phobia
per Rhododendrites and , due to absence of |secondary sources. Primary sources (opinion pieces) in http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-a-rizvi/the-phobia-of-being-calle_b_5215218.html HuffPo (partisan), http://nypost.com/2016/06/13/what-we-really-need-to-reject-is-islamophobia-phobia/ New York Post (tabloid), http://www.foxnews.com/story/2010/08/29/are-islamophobia-phobic.html Fox News (partisan; claims to have coined the term in 2016), and https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/524/on-islamophobia-phobia the New Humanist (good for a primary source, but insufficient) are not RS for the purposes of GNG. Secondary sources are required by  as well; without them it's definitionally impossible to write an article satisfying , which not okay because the topic is politicized
— User:FourViolas, 12:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK||WP:PSTS||WP:NEO||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Content forking)