Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatal dog attacks in the United States
Per , a list meets notability requirements when the list topic has substantial received coverage by reliable sources. Fatal dog attack in the United States is a subject that has received a lot of coverage and analysis; here are some secondary sources I found after only a rudimentary search: https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/09/13/americas-most-dangerous-dog-breeds-infographic/#6b9bdaaa62f8https://www.avma.org/News/Journals/Collections/Documents/javma_217_6_836.pdfhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4595761?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=fatal&searchText=dog&searchText=attacks&searchText=united&searchText=states&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dfatal%2Bdog%2Battacks%2Bunited%2Bstates%26amp%3Bacc%3Doff%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_expensive%2Fcontrol&refreqid=search%3A01c0915309f8d0124a99c59fdac096fa&seq=1https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_Lawyer_s_Guide_to_Dangerous_Dog_Issues/hbEVF7RrUiIC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=fatal+dog+attacks+in+the+united+states&pg=PA1&printsec=frontcover. I believe that  may be a bigger problem: the list size is massive, and I expect that a reasonably complete list would have several thousand listings. However, I think the article does a good job contextualizing the information, and the list is broken up into three sub-articles. Given the extensive academic interest (largely medical and legal) in American dog attacks and the fact that every listing has received coverage in reliable sources, I do not believe indiscriminate is a good reason to delete
— User:Spirit, 05:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Notability)