Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caméléon language
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by .  Sources provided are  and thus, not helpful.  Further the article is self-promotional.  The author is of the article is one of the authors of this new language, which is an obvious onflict of interest.  Wikipedia is not a means of , nor a RYSTALBALL of things that may someday become notable, nor for things you 
— User:Msnicki, 18:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY||WP:C||WP:PROMOTION||WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:MADEUP (Wikipedia:Notability)