Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Steel Buildings
Quite aside from that it's extremely condescending to imply that Canadian First Nations people neither use books, newspapers or reliable newssources, there is a strange school of thought circulating around Wikipedia that if there is some putative excuse for reliable sources not to be found on a particular subject, the requirements of , ,  and/or  are suspended. '''This curious notion has no basis in policy or guideline.'''Moreover, it is quite possible to advocate the deletion of an article on its merits, without requiring a grudge against First Nations or needing to be an editor from Ontario.  There is nothing in policy or guideline, either, giving a free pass to companies that have allegedly done work for the military; no doubt thousands of companies do, from giant multinationals to the local meat market supplying the PX.But that being said, this is not some outfit operating out of a Quonset hut north-of-60.  This is a company headquartered, according to its article, in a city of 250,000 people in metro Toronto.  Such a company, were it genuinely notable, would have ample opportunity to be the subject of reliable sources.  As it happens, there are zero Google News hits, an ominous sign.  Fails .  No prejudice against userfication
— User:Ravenswing, 17:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Verifiability)