Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Shepherd English School
An |essay with pseudostatistical generalizations about past events is not a prescription for future decisions such that we bypass all of the other policies and guidelines. If there's really a long-standing consensus to keep them all no matter what the circumstances, it needs to be in an SNG. Long-standing consensus is ''not'' that schools get a free pass; it's that most schools have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject sufficient to satisfy our |notability criteria. There is, however, long-standing ''practice'' of citing  at AfD as though it were an SNG, essentially resting arguments on "other stuff exists" (an "other stuff exists" argument that continuously feeds itself). As this does not appear to have been subject to that coverage, it should not be kept just because it's a school.  Happy to change my !vote if someone has more luck with sources. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 13:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OUTCOMES||WP:N||WP:OUTCOMES (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)