Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temporary tattoo
and create a redirect to Tattoo. The article might possibly be eligible but cleary fails . Deliberately created as artspam and has slipped throgh the net ever since. The only sources/links are still purely commercial and Ghits appear to return no dedicated in-depth treatment other  than a blog-style editorial in ''Vogue'' which on its own is not enough.  The section in the suggested redirect target at Tattoo#Temporary tattoos also needs better sourcing than the incorrectly cited retro enhanced Wikipedia article on a non Foundation 3rd party wiki
— User:Kudpung, 03:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)