Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (5th nomination)
we're apparently once again back to the invalid POV-fork argument.  of ''what'' content? POV fork is not just a term to throw around, they have characteristics, none of which this list falls under. The  claim is an argument that calls for  not deletion. Basically this is a  AfD. What should be considered is |notability and nothing else, and to claim that the topic-area (sceptical scientists) that the list covers isn't notable, is to me rather strange
— User:KimDabelsteinPetersen, 23:39, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK||WP:POV||WP:SOFIXIT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:N (Wikipedia:Content forking)