Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kritik
It might pass , but it's certainly an awful lot of unsourced text here. It's an interesting subject. I came to it via http://www.radiolab.org/story/debatable/ this Radiolab episode. I will say that while some of the papers are hosted at the uvm site, that includes publications in Rostrum, a journal published by the National Forensic League. I'm also seeing some other sources that I'll retrieve if I decide to argue for keeping. As it stands, this is just way too much based on way too little, and I'm not convinced it couldn't just be included elsewhere (a critical theory- or debate-related article). Possible also to userfy if the article creator wants a chance to improve it to work within Wikipedia's sourcing policies. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 20:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)