Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Mei Li Josephine
The position in question makes her a ''bureaucrat'', not a ''legislator'', so there's no automatic presumption of notability just because she exists — but the "references" here are both |primary sources (her own Facebook and her staff profile on the website of her own past employer), which are not independent of her and thus cannot support notability. No prejudice against recreation in the future ''if'' she can be shown as the ''subject'' of enough ''media'' coverage to clear , but merely existing is not grounds for an improperly sourced article
— User:Bearcat, 15:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)