Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert Cawthorne
per SKCRIT 2 or 3 - I have serious concerns about the conduct of the nominator and the nomination is clearly erroneous that I don't believe the nominator has even read the article, let alone undertaken . There ''are'' references in the article and they clearly show that this player is notable per  (professional with multiple appearances) - the article simply needs improving, not deleting
— User:GiantSnowman, 22:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:NFOOTBALL (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)