Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courageous (film) (2nd nomination)
for reasons stated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courageous (film)|the last discussion. First of all, you said, "the only sources covering this film are religious sources affiliated with it and intending to promote it"; this is incorrect. Please view the sources to WALB, KWTX-TV, WFXL, ''The Oklahoman'' and Box Office Mojo (this last one is about ''Fireproof'', not ''Courageous'', but relates to it). The "religious" sources are to some of the most famous and reliable news sites that deal with Christianity; ''The Christian Post'', the ''Baptist Press'', ''Christian Today'' and Charisma (magazine)|''Charisma'' magazine (notice: they are all reliable sources ''with'' Wikipedia articles). None them are affiliated with the film, as you incorrectly said. The topic of failing WP:NF was dealed with in the last AfD, and I'll quote myself from there: "This is not a conventional film, and really isn't notable as a film and its principal photography. It is the ''centerpiece'' of Christian film, and had a worldwide announcement that anticipated thousands of people and brought dozens of media outlets to a church service. The film, although yes, it is still scripting and casting, is clearly notable (per )." I'm fine with the Facebook number of fans being removed; I only added it because a news article stated it. '''Strong Keep''', and this AfD was unnecessary
— User:American, 20:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)