Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rational trigonometry
Removing valid sources from the article and then claiming sources couldn't be found is '''extremely''' bad form by the nominator, who deserves a . The deleted sources included a properly cited journal article (Olga Kosheleva, ''Geombinatorics'', Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008, pp. 18–25), which I have restored to the article. Problems with the accompanying urls were no reason at all to delete the references (as has been noted). A quick Google books search also finds several mentions of Wildberger's ideas, e.g. in Shirali & Vasudeva (2010), ''Multivariable Analysis'', Springer, pp 246-247; Harrison (2009), ''Handbook of Practical Logic and Automated Reasoning'', Cambridge University Press, p. 414. Together with the ''New Scientist'' article, and the MAA book review, that puts it over the notability line in my view, and indicates an ongoing interest in Wildberger's (possibly nutty) ideas. His finitism|finitist approach is interesting particularly for computational mathematics and automated reasoning, however. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.15.209|101.119.15.209
— [[User talk:101.119.15.209|talk]]), 11:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TROUT (Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout)