Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FBI raid of Michael Cohen's Office
We not only have a huge amount of coverage, but there's a growing body of commentary explaining why this raid is incredibly important.  It's rare on WP for us not only to have RS but to have RS explicitly stating that the subject is notable.  Just for instance, see http://reason.com/volokh/2018/04/10/why-the-fbi-raid-on-michael-cohens-offic Volokh Conspiracy and https://www.popehat.com/2018/04/09/the-search-of-trump-lawyer-michael-cohens-office-what-we-can-infer-immediately/ Popehat.  Sure, these are blogs, but as  says, "''Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications.''"  These are reliable sources telling us that this raid is hugely important.  Thus it certainly meets the GNG. Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
— [[User talk:192.160.216.52|talk]]), 14:07, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLOGS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)