Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia
per multiple  and  asserting notability, per . In future this article could be expanded to include other controversies around the IWF, but there is more than enough to justify a seperate article, and this would overwhelm the IWF article. Putting the image in question on the IWF article itself with this content would also be tasteless, though it is justified in this article. I see no policy arguments for deletion. Added bonus: a light should always be cast on censorship, whether justified or not, but especially when unjustified (I realise that isn't wikipedia policy, that's just my view
— User:Verbal, 13:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Verifiability)