Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corinna Löckenhoff
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corinna_L%C3%B6ckenhoff&type=revision&diff=934678398&oldid=934676456 This revert on the basis of COI reintroduced multiple factual errors. The first two I noticed were that the subject's affiliation is now listed incorrectly, and a co-edited book has become a co-authored one. I dislike COI edits as much as anybody, but this is a case where the subject made changes in good faith and provided citations (e.g., https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/rising/corinna-e-lockenhoff.htmlhttps://www.geron.org/press-room/press-releases/2016-press-releases/647-the-gerontological-society-of-america-selects-2016-fellows). This is definitely a situation where more consideration is required, and |blindly following default procedure makes things worse. I have https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corinna_L%C3%B6ckenhoff&type=revision&diff=935272214&oldid=935198526 refactored the "Career" section to make it focus on the standard topics of an academic biography rather than reporting individual grants. This was not a major time investment on my part, and I wouldn't regret it if we decide to follow Dr. Löckenhoff's first choice and delete the page. I think there's a good argument made in the !votes above to the effect that, while she may clear the bar set by |our notability guideline for academics, her wiki-notability is not so overwhelming that it should mean we override her request
— User:XOR, 17:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)