Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furcadia (2nd nomination)
that I'm a little confused as to where to leave. I have to say, I didn't see one guideline or policy brought up in that entire nomination. At a glance, the article looks okay, but if it's missing notable information that can be verified by reliable sources, add it. If the subject is non-notable, perhaps that should have been mentioned somewhere in the nomination. Even if everything the nominator said is true, I'm inclined to say, assuming the subject is notable, '''keep''' per 
— User:Nosleep, 04:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)