Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of relationships with age disparity
I have changed the excessively arbitrary criteria to a simpler and if anything overinclusive straight five-year cutoff.  I have also added {{tl|verify}}, since it doesn't cite sources.  Obviously it will be hard to complete, but not impossible, and in any case that's true of many lists.  But it's definitely verifiable; also neutral (it no more expresses the POV that age discrepancies are interesting than the existence Age disparity in sexual relationships does: both assume that the reader may be interested in their content, and it's certainly verifiable that ''some'' people are); and isn't inherently original research |as we define it.  It's a perfectly reasonable organization of preexisting information.I will note that I came here because Mr. Norton http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Simetrical&diff=58956238&oldid=58842162 contacted me on my talk page due to my self-categorization as a member of the m:Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians|Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians.  I don't think that makes my opinion worthless, but it should be noted by the closing admin.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Richard+Arthur+Norton+%281958-+%29 his contribs: he contacted somewhere around forty inclusionists
— User:Simetrical, 20:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)