Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noninterference (Buddhism)
The recent lengthy addition, which probably prompted this AfD, is entirely  and runs afoul of , while its promotion of Buddhism in Wikipedia's voice is .  That definitely has to go whatever the outcome of this AfD.  That leaves us with the original single sentence that sounds to me like it could be a Buddhist principle, but I'm not seeing any verification of it.  There is the Buddhist idea of ''detachment'' through meditation, but that is not quite the same thing and in any case a single sentence will say no more than is already in the Buddhism article.  I'm seeing references in sources to two meanings of Buddhist non-interference, neither of which matches the definition given in this article ({{xt|...the idea that all things are impermanent, with a resignation to events beyond human control.}}).  The first is the idea that Buddhist monks should not interfere in worldly affairs (e.g. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=iepJAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT1315 ''Encyclopedia of Monasticism'') and the second is non-interference with local religious practices (e.g. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lPdgDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA468 ''Encyclopedia of Buddhism'').  I have no objection to creation of a well-sourced article at this title, but there is nothing worth keeping in the current offering
— User:Spinningspark, 11:13, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NOTESSAY||WP:POV (Wikipedia:No original research)