Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fish Karma
I haven't decided yet if I think it's salvageable. It relies for sourcing primarily on the website of the record label that handles the artist, which violates . Wikipedia:N#Notability_requires_objective_evidence|The notability guidelines require objective evidence. The individual ''may'' have two albums on notable independent labels, which would meet  criteria. Alternative Tentacles Records qualifies. I'm not sure about Deep Shag Records, since it seems to pin its notability at least in part on this (and Harlan Ellison). The other two artists wikilinked within the label site are not helpful, since one of those sources back merely to the label and the other leads to a disambig page which does not seem to contain the band referenced. I'm not convinced of the notability of Deep Shag Records, since  indicates that a major indie label has been around more than a few years (check) and has "a roster of performers, many of which are notable" (not that the article indicates). The individual does seem to have ''local'' notability (See http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/media/local_music/rock/karma_fish/index.html here and http://www.tucsonweekly.com/gbase/Music/Content?oid=oid%3A44333 this Tuscon paper indicates that "Fish Karma has still had an illustrious career, at least here in the Old Pueblo."), but I haven't been able to find anything beyond local coverage, coverage by the record labels and directory style listings. I look forward to seeing if others have more luck, which may help me make up my mind. *''In the interests of full disclosure, I have to reveal that I'm currently leaning "delete
— User:Moonriddengirl, 22:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC (Wikipedia:Verifiability)