Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SYSLINUX
The key point remains about the  key sources presented.  The nom. has challenged only one of these - the implication to date is the other two are okay RS.  TipsyElephant has vaguewave looked for reliable choices but ignored specifically the one's presented; and suggested what I would regard as a poor choice of redirect which reveals insufficient investigation of the subject.  Thankyou
— User:Djm, 09:41, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:THREE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)