Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)
Dicklyon, why don't you just  it?  You don't seem to be in dispute with anyone so you probably have a free hand.  That way you don't need to do substantial work on it right now, and the page remains open for anyone who wants to improve it.  I agree with Chiswick Chap, this is definitely a notable subject.  It's a terrible article, full of maths nobody cares about (even if it was correct) and missing basic concepts that might actually help the reader, like the fact that SNR is proportional to root imaging time https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=5UXOBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA602.  But I don't think we need to TNT it in this case
— User:Spinningspark, 14:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:STUBIFY (Wikipedia:Stub)