Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pundits
More reliable sources exist for this: see, for example, "http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/01/24/punditry-performance-art-with-a-paycheck/ Punditry: Performance art with a paycheck". Reliable sources can define who is and who is not a pundit—and unless you can find reliable sources disputing that someone is a "pundit", then ignoring the reliable sources that say they are is just as much |original research and |biased as including entries which aren't verifiable. Further, |categories and lists work in synergy, and should be used to maintain each other
— User:DHowell, 04:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:CLN (Wikipedia:No original research)