Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cytosorbents
as failing both  and the .  Although there were plenty of press releases to review, significant independent coverage wasn't found.  Also considered refocusing the article on their flagship product CytoSorb and significant coverage to support that wasn't found either.  (I see the AFD is listed with the CSD G11 criterion, which isn't directly applicable to an AFD discussion, but I didn't find the article in its current status overwhelmingly promotional enough to qualify for CSD G11.  If I thought it did I would have short-circuited the AFD by tagging it with that CSD instead
— User:Zad68, 01:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)