Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DKP (2nd nomination)
This is rapidly becoming a re-hash of the original debate.  Yes, it's .  Yes, it exists.  Yes, it is true.  None of these things satisfies the the problem that this article does not have a ''single'' reliable resource per .  That's what makes it original research.  If it's just going to stir up the |single purpose accounts to come out and cast their !votes to keep it because it's a great article, then fine, but ''please'' would someone who wants to hang on to it provide at least a compelling argument as to how it satisfies policies and guidelines
— User:Arkyan, 21:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:USEFUL||WP:RS||WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)