Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Smith Pegues
The subject's references meet the notability guidelines for . This article was created in accordance with Wikipedia's  guidelines and approved for publishing via the Articles for Creation (AfC) process. In good faith, I have worked to improve the article's references and tone. The content does not meet the -REASON criteria of ''"advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content"''. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation&diff=prev&oldid=912240886 Personal opinion should not override Wikipedia's guidelines. Between October 2018 and September 2019, I've contributed six paid articles which were approved for publishing by AfC editors. Between 12/18/19 and 12/25/19, five of these articles were tagged (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:E-Stylus&diff=931301944&oldid=929450311 1a, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:E-Stylus&diff=931621014&oldid=931301944 1b, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deborah_Smith_Pegues&diff=931697154&oldid=916294718 2a, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deborah_Smith_Pegues&diff=932054760&oldid=931697154 2b, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hily&diff=931696524&oldid=923339594 3, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Art_of_Elysium&diff=932341531&oldid=932219211 4, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vecna_Robotics&diff=932341983&oldid=923274923 5). While I'm more than willing to improve my writing style relative to Wikipedia's guidelines, it is unreasonable to expect that these articles would reflect the tone preferences of one editor when the content was approved by multiple other AfC editors. The outcome of this article should be determined by its content and adherence to site guidelines
— User:E, 03:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:PAID||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Notability)