Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Woods
I certainly see no evidence he meets , which requires influence, innovation, reviews, academic study, or holdings in major public collections. "He experimented with different mediums throughout his ‘education period’ but came to the conclusion that the formal art course could not help in '''my''' quest for a more traditional approach to painting and realised that he didn’t want to paint watercolour landscapes either. ... He uses a digital camera as photographic reference for many of '''my''' paintings" (emphasis added) Does anybody think this might be not only autobiographical but poorly edited? That isn't in itself grounds for deletion but does suggest that nobody else thinks he's notable
— User:Colapeninsula, 11:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Notability)