Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katharine Beeman
Nothing stated in the article passes , and the references are not |reliable or notability-supporting sources for the purposes of establishing that she would pass GNG. Prism would be a reliable source in theory — but the source being cited is not a review of her work, but a review of somebody ''else's'' work which has Beeman as its bylined ''author'', which means it isn't ''about Beeman
— User:Bearcat, 02:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)