Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of governors
and develop, this is a completely obvious search term and parent for organizing our lists of governors, particularly since List of governors even redirects here. Seems like a pretty standard set index to me, in aid of reader navigation and content organization. See  ("It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative."),   ("If users have some general idea of what they are looking for but do not know the specific terminology, they could browse the lists of basic topics and more comprehensive lists of topics..."), and  ("...Wikipedia functions as an index or directory of its own content..."). On the nominator's complaints, first, if it "duplicates" a category, then how is it unclear what should be in this list? It could obviously be expanded to match the contents of the category, and organized and annotated in a way that the category cannot, yet the nominator inappropriately focuses on the list's current state rather than its potential. Second, it's ''our'' list of what articles we have on this topic, so it's completely irrelevant if not nonsensical to complain that our list is not "discussed in sources". Re: LISTN, to the extent that guideline is helpful here, see governor; clearly the position or title that these are lists of is notable
— User:Postdlf, 17:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDUP||WP:LISTPURP||WP:NOTDIR (Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates)