Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 4
The article doesn't provide reliable sources with significant coverage that make analytic or evaluative claims about the event, so I believe it doesn't even pass the |general notability guideline. Like other similar articles, the information is merely |routine coverage, nothing to indicate historical significance or at least a significant lasting effect of the event, so it is not appropriate for Wikipedia. The article falls into WP:!|what Wikipedia is not as it is at best a |news report and the topic does not meet the exception criteria of  since, outside routine coverage, there are no independent reliable sources indicating that the event is notable and there is no sanctioning body or league to presume that it is inherently notable. With no target for a redirect and a lack of reliable references, I favor deletion
— User:Jfgslo, 18:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:SPORTSEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)