Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osano
being promotional isn't a reason to delete per se. Of the four sources currently in the article, Crunchbase is not reliable and the BusinessWire one is simply a press release. However, the Techcrunch and Business Insider articles are substantial pieces, and the publishers are at least not ''obviously'' unreliable. And then there's a lot of coverage in what look to me like 'semi-reliable' online business and techy publications such as http://www.siliconhillsnews.com/2019/10/25/complying-with-data-privacy-laws-may-not-be-sexy-but-austin-based-osano-says-its-a-billion-dollar-business/https://www.informationweek.com/big-data/big-data-analytics/data-privacy-transparency-get-new-weapon/d/d-id/1334465https://xconomy.com/texas/2019/06/19/big-business-has-your-data-and-osano-is-rating-how-they-handle-it/ and https://www.komando.com/security-privacy/be-careful-these-major-companies-are-not-protecting-your-personal-data/574428/. Taken together, I think there's enough to meet  and 
— User:Hugsyrup, 11:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)