Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Cook
I believe he exists. Unfortunately, that's not enough to substantiate notability such that we should have a article about the fellow. The two credible claims to notability (as I see it) would be the awards cited the ''The Atlantic'' interview and that interview itself and the 8-line passing mention he got because someone at ''The Guardian'' thought a doco he wrote was the ''least boring'' thing on local television that week. I don't think the two combined are enough to substantiate a pass against  and I don't think his books are enough to substantiate a pass against . The interview is (as most Frank Bures interviews are) about the topic, not the interviewee; in this case the issue and Cook's book. Even if he were to have talked about himself more, I don't know that would have helped. I'm willing to concede that a couple more high-quality sources might get this over the line, but I don't think we're there yet. Once again, the suggestion that a perfectly routine discussion about a subject and whether or not it meets our inclusion criteria is "censorship" is total nonsense
— User:Stalwart111, 00:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)