Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fasoracetam
The nomination seems to be based upon .  That is supported by an arbcom statement of principle that "Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rex071404#Principles|An encyclopedia article is a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject, not a complete exposition of all possible details."  That doesn't seem to be a reason to delete an entire page; instead it's just an endorsement of our |summary style.This chemical clearly exists and it doesn't seem difficult to find review-class sources of reasonable quality which say things like "http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUS1-0010-0004 some new drugs such as nefiracetam and fasoracetam appear promising."  This is one of a family of such drugs and the family is covered in sources such as http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/cpd/2002/00000008/00000002/art00004 Design and Study of Piracetam-like Nootropics, Controversial Members of the Problematic Class of Cognition-Enhancing Drugs.  The worst case would therefore be to merge into some wider article about the family such as racetam.  It is our |editing policy to retain such content in a constructive way rather than deleting it
— user:Andrew, 05:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTEVERYTHING||WP:SUMMARY||WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)