Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mermelstein (2nd nomination)
While a lot of the references are press statements and passing mentions, I think there is no question this person passes . None of the independent sources are actually about him, but they do go into sufficient detail. On the other hand I do not believe there is any doubt Mermelstein passes any other notability guideline. So I believe this case is about the word ''presumed'' in the GN guideline. The subject is completely |run-of-the-mill, as the initiator of this discussion eloquently points out. In a way this article could be A7-ed because it does not even attempt to point out any specific fact that makes Mermelstein special. As the ''presumed'' in GNG can only be rebutted by , I think the policy reasons to delete this are YELLOW, point 2, and WHOSWHO, point 4
— User:Pgallert, 08:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:NOT||WP:NOTYELLOW||WP:NOTWHOSWHO (Wikipedia:Notability)