Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biscuits and human sexuality
obviously, as the creator. In what way is this original research? Every single factual claim, is cited; in almost every case to easily verifiable and indisputably reliable sources. It's only a "synthesis" in that it's an article about different aspects of a topic – which ''every'' article of ours other than the most specialised is. What "novel conclusion that is not in any of the sources" are you suggesting I'm making here? I very carefully avoided making ''any'' conclusions or value judgments. Your nomination, which appears to boil down to , seems to me to fail to do the same. Obviously, it's a sketchy article; it was less than six hours old at the time you nominated it for deletion. What policy exactly are you claiming this article violates?&nbsp;–&nbsp
— User:Iridescent, 00:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)