Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaCoder
Per the above source and two pages in http://books.google.com/books?id=7ra_GzPjRhUC&pg=RA2-PA439&dq=%22MediaCoder%22&cd=10#v=onepage&q=%22MediaCoder%22&f=false This O'Reilly Japan book, and this http://books.google.com/books?id=_4j9S7hyiWkC&pg=PT273&dq=%22MediaCoder%22&cd=1#v=onepage&q=%22MediaCoder%22&f=false this German book discusses it on two pages together with another (similar?) program called ''Super'' from eRightSoft. All of this does not amount to trivial coverage for a program of this kind. The nomination appears to be a case of "it's not popular with English speakers, so delete". Even if you don't grok those languages at all, you can tell it's the same program based on the screenshots. As for English user reviews, I http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/18/mediacoder/ had http://www.pcauthority.com.au/forums/yaf_postst8658_ReviewMedia-coder--The-only-Multimedia-converter-you-will-EVER-need.aspx no http://www.freewarewiki.com/MediaCoder trouble finding some of those too, and there are about 45 comments on the http://www.videohelp.com/tools/MediaCoder#usercomments portal site for this kind of software (http://www.alexa.com/search?q=videohelp.com alexa rank). There's a web world wide outside CNnet... And the issue you take with the license, which can be fixed by editing, appears to be a case of . Found http://www.videohelp.com/forum/archive/is-mediacoder-0-7-0-4396-safe-t367892.html discussion of the adware issue too
— User:Pohta, 10:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)