Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles Routledge
oh boy, it's another one of those, huh? I've been passively following this discussion, and a lot of the more recent support for deletion features an increasingly undeniable tinge of . I also have to call into serious question statements like {{tq|sources alone (reliable or not) are not enough, “No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists“}} – sorry to say, but no, the second half doesn't really have much to do with the first one at all, and reliable sources alone indeed ''are'' enough. Mainly per JPxG's eloquent words above, I find myself in favor of inclusion by this point
— User:AngryHarpy, 17:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)