Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellypunching
For those voting keep while ackowledging that this fails , a question: ''why'' is this worth keeping if no proper sources can be found?  Sure, it likely exists and some have heard of the practice, but why should a sexual fetish with a small audience have an article when, say, a webcomic with a small, but clearly existent, following and no relaible third-party media coverage is readily deleted?  Why should an article about a sexual fetish garner apparent AfD bonus points
— User:Scientizzle, 18:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)