Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Dabi
to List of Union Public Service Commission Civil Services Toppers.  Being a "topper" is the ony thing that she is known for, desipte how inspirational that may be for some people. This is a clear case where the ''policy'' at  Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event applies.  Tina Dabi is a living person and meets the definition of a Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual|low-profile individual.  In addition, the coverage of her is ''only'' about one event, her score on the Civil Service exam and the background leading up to that.  Aside from that one event there is no independent coverage. Thus, the guideline Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event (WP:BIO1E) also applies.  If at some later time she distinguishes herself in another way, then her Wikipedia notability may be reconsidered. {{Ping|Juneymb}} Note that Wikipedia:Notability (people)|Wikipedia notability is not the same as an inspirational story.  If later there is in depth coverage about her in the context of having inspired others to achieve their goals, not just passing coverage, her Wikipedia notability may be reconsidered, but that kind of coverage, if it does occur, is reasonably years from now, otherwise it is just .  With regard to your comment about football (soccer) and cricket players: (1) Sports figures have a specific and different set of notability guidelines. Wikipedia:Notability (sports) (2) Such comparative arguments are very weak, see the essays at Wikipedia:Other stuff exists, Wikipedia:Pokémon test, and in general Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
— User:Bejnar, 20:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTALBALL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)