Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronological summary of the 2008 Summer Olympics
unless someone can persuade me there is something wrong with this article. Finding information in reliable sources, summarising it in your own words, and putting it into some kind of order (e.g. chronological) isn't . It's how encyclopedias get written. It looks like an impressive article to me. What's the objection
— User:AndyJones, 13:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)