Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Pierpont
When 'legitimate' and 'suppression of the truth' are brought into an argument, I tend to look for the angle... Whatever the 'truth' here, Wikipedia is not a vehicle (leaded or unleaded) for campaigning. It is the notability of the article subject that counts, not the justice of it, or the honesty of the campaigner. I am concerned that all the references appear to be from windturbinesyndrome.com, which I find hard to believe is a neutral third party source. (I haven't managed to get into these references yet - they don't seem to want to load.) The publication mentioned is not yet published, bringing  into play, possibly
— User:Peridon, 21:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)