Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanking
Bit of a  /  situation. Sourcing present doesn't do much to convince that this is notable from an encyclopedic standpoint. It's obviously a real term (not a hoax), but I see no evidence aside from the article's attempts at historic context (which are original and not pulled directly from sourcing), that this is notable from Wikipedia's standpoint. Suppose I'd support '''merging''' per JFHJr above, although there's not much to merge
— User:Ginsengbomb, 05:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DICTDEF||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)