Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chemical compounds with unusual names (5th nomination)
This looks like it is heading to at least no-consensus-to-delete, if not an outright 'keep'. Repeated (5th nomination!?) nomination seems counter-productive and foolish. On the other hand, the current |inclusion criteria ("a sample of trivial names") is vague and |not at all discriminating. That needs to be cleaned up, or it will just invite a sixth (ugh!) nomination. The second inclusion criteria, "some examples of systematic names and acronyms that accidentally resemble English words," is much better, but could still be made more precise. I humbly suggest that some of the editors spending time crafting arguments to delete or keep the article could be better employed improving the criteria for inclusion
— User:Cnilep, 01:43, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LSC||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)