Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Michael Lacey (2nd nomination)
He is not actually an actor--he's an extra who has also engaged in some manual labor around movie sets.  He does not satisfy .  Go ahead and search the ''entire historical archive'' of Google News for him and you will come up with precisely '''''ZERO HITS''''': http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22Aaron+Michael+Lacey.  If he were in fact any sort of notable actor, there would have been at least one news article about him since the beginning of creation, and there hasn't been even one single utterance about him in print.  Most of the "sources" used to buttress this article are indeed self-generated, and don't be fooled, because ''that includes IMDB'', to which subjects can contribute their own resumes.  In fact, the earlier version of this article, before I revised it down to a stub, was nothing more than a  from IMDB.  Additionally, there has been heavy  and  here, both in the writing of the article and in the previous AfD.  The prior discussion was also tainted by behavior that looked very much like , and if we see that again, a checkuser will be the way to proceed.  Finally, I have actually seen him (only because I was looking for him in the corner of the set) in his latest and greatest role, in John Adams (miniseries), in a scene that lasts about two minutes in the U.S. Senate--he is, as always, an extra, just sitting there for a few micro-moments without a line to utter.  This article, in its various versions, has never been anything but self-promotion to the extreme, and the previous AfD contained only one keep vote--a suspicious one at that--so I was very surprised that it survived with No Consensus.  Let's get rid of it now and salt it if it's recreated
— User:Qworty, 14:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:COPYVIO||WP:COI||WP:AUTO||WP:SOCK (Wikipedia:Notability)