Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemson University football recruiting scandal
Personally I don't think these types of infractions generally deserve their own articles except in rare cases such as the SMU death penalty case (which actually doesn't have an article) and should normally be handled in a section in University Mascots football ''but'' the subject does meet notability guidelines and reliable sources can be found so it certainly may stand as an individual article. Although there are many bytes in this kitchen sink nomination, a large percentage are dedicated to a misplaced behavior report and refutation of a single errant statement in the article that does not represent a fatal flaw. Furthermore, the nominator misunderstands/mistates #TEMP|not temporary and claims via bullet point the ''topic has not received "significant coverage" in secondary sources'' and then immediately backtracks acknowledging that reliable sources certainly exist
— User:Autiger, 03:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)