Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerglove (3rd nomination)
There are a lot more references now than there were when the 2nd nom was done.  So, there may be notaility established now that wasn't before.  I am nto sure whether the references meet the requirements though, so I am withholding judgement.  If they do, then obviously keep, if not, restore redirect. Although the redirect has been overridden, that is hardly abusive give the added references provided (even if they prove not be adequate under 
— User:Rlendog, 18:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)