Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karrinyup Shopping Centre
Meets . The question we are asking here is, is the subject notable? The answer is yes, a 54,000 sqm shopping centre in a city as isolated as Perth is clearly so. Only two comparable shopping centres exist in the region in consideration. Never mind that the article is clearly a stub - that is an issue for cleanup, and obviously something that would have been looked at given time. Editors are not only usually busy people but also volunteers and work on a range of article types, and by far the majority of articles on Wikipedia are at present stubs, so demanding they be developed at the sole discretion of another editor at the other side of the world is somewhat disingenuous. , Wikipedia's deletion policy, expressly states: "''If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion. A variety of tags can be added to articles to note the problem.''" I am concerned that this AfD (which started off as a proposed deletion!) and some of the comments above are an example of rampant meta:Deletionism|Deletionism which has become the norm in recent times. I note that it is presently 12:36am in Perth, so most likely editors who actually are familiar with the subject, or with shopping centres in Australia more broadly, are unlikely to comment for some hours
— User:Zivko85, 16:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Notability)