Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitweaver2
The problem with the Newsource article interview is it is not focused on Bitweaver only.  That makes it a 'trivial-source' per the stated Policies (read them if you disbelieve me). We do not have Multiple, Reliable, Independent, Third-Party sources that mention this software exclusively. We have an article with a passing reference, and a handful of security warnings from a software security website. Nothing that would denote a passing of 
— User:Bschott, 22:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)