Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houndstooth (record label)
I was initially skeptical, but started checking the sources referenced and was surprised to find that most have Wikipedia articles (''Resident Advisor'', ''Dazed'', ''Tiny Mix Tapes'', ''XLR8R''), so it appears they're something more than 'random websites'. In particular, ''Resident Advisor'' appears to be a |reliable source and https://www.residentadvisor.net/features/1802 their feature on Houndstooth is certainly significant coverage. A quick google also turned up http://www.factmag.com/2012/12/19/london-club-fabric-announces-new-label-houndstooth-full-details-and-forthcoming-releases-inside/ a substantial article in ''Fact (UK magazine)'' and http://www.npr.org/2016/02/19/467134456/songs-we-love-snow-ghosts-undertow a 9-nine paragraph on npr.org. So it seems to me that the subject meets  as having received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I agree that the 'Discography' section should be deleted per , however
— User:Qwfp, 13:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOTCATALOGUE||WP:reliable source (Wikipedia:Notability)