Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Biscoe
unless the article sees significant |improvement before close. Nothing here constitutes an automatic presumption of notability just because he exists, if the sourcing present in the article isn't sufficient to get him over  — and while it's true that an article can be deemed to pass GNG if adequate sources exist even if the article isn't up to scratch yet, it's not enough to just ''say'' that adequate sources exist: one has to ''show'' hard ''evidence'' that adequate sources exist, such as the actual hard results of an actual search. And even if this does get deleted, that doesn't constitute a permanent ban on his ever being allowed to have an article — if somebody can write and source something ''better'' than this, they ''are'' allowed to try again. But we can't keep an entirely |primary sourced version just because somebody ''asserts'' that stronger sources exist somewhere
— User:Bearcat, 19:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:HEY||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)