Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeneCalling (2nd nomination)
I partially rewrote the article by cutting promotional content, rewriting the lead, and adding independent reliable sources. Of the sources in the article, The Kirst 2005, Green 2001, and Klein 2002 sources seem independent reliable sources with enough depth to write a short article on the topic. Multiple reliable sources are sufficient for notability per  and with the promotional content largely gone,  and  no longer apply. There is of course much room for improvement, but the article has . A notable topic and an article with  problems suggests keeping the article
— User:Mark, 21:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROMO||WP:TNT||WP:POTENTIAL||WP:SURMOUNTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)