Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Zhong (Ming dynasty)
for reasons I'll go into below. But first I must say I'd be tempted to vote keep just because of the flaws in the arguments above to delete. As has been stated above, creation of this page is not even remotely |pointy, it's a valid response to the RM discussion and should be commended. (This deletion nomination is however arguably pointy, being raised by the nom of the RM.) Now to the positives: The subject does pass the |GNG, barely but clearly. Chinese Wikipedia https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%BB%B4%E5%9F%BA%E6%96%87%E5%BA%93 has a similar stub (but I assume the Wikisource document(s?) to which it links are the source discussed above). https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Wang+Zhong+(Ming+dynasty)+-Wikipedia Google web search gives me over a million hits, hard to say (not reading Chinese) how relevant any are but certainly a case to answer, https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Wang+Zhong+(Ming+dynasty)+-Wikipedia&tbm=bks Google books almost five thousand, similarly not easy to tell how relevant and some at least are not, I even had a look at Google images which may be more productive but still time consuming. In conclusion, a good stub which should be given a chance
— User:Andrewa, 15:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:point (Wikipedia:Notability)