Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken (Memphis May Fire album)
There have been a total of 12 references supplied to date and I cannot find more. To meet  the album has to have 1) significant coverage 2) in reliable sources 3) that are independent of the subject. The following are brief,  coverage http://bringthenoise.com/blog/qa-matty-mullins-talks-new-memphis-may-fire http://bringthenoise.com/blog/the-noise-presents-atreyus-in-our-wake-tour-with http://loudwire.com/memphis-may-fire-broken-album-the-old-me-single/ https://www.altpress.com/news/memphis-may-fire-broken-album-old-me-song/ http://www.metalsucks.net/2018/08/27/atreyu-announce-tour-with-memphis-may-fire-and-ice-nine-kills/ https://www.facebook.com/revolvermag/videos/506190199881714/ while https://www.allmusic.com/album/broken-mw0003211617/releases is just a database entry: no review or anything significant. The following is not a reliable source https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/memphis-may-fire/broken.p/ The following are not independent of the subject https://open.spotify.com/album/6OjdYx9U5k0Tex2SAKyDSh https://twitter.com/memphismayfire/status/1042217362978754567. In short it fails GNG. It in no way meets  either. A redirect is not an option since it went through RfD and the decision was that it should be restored it, so it's clear that they do not think it should be a redirect and they would not discuss the lack of sources. No double-jeopardy. As for the "notable single" notability is  so the single can have an article, but there are no sources for the album
— User:Walter, 17:09, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:GNG||:WP:ROUTINE||:WP:NALBUM||:WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Notability)