Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of software license violations
per  and . It appears that 100% of the references in this article are unusable as reliable sources for the facts they're citing – that the list entries violate the licenses of some other software. For example, consider http://busybox.net/shame.html this page on the BusyBox site. While that source would be OK for citing statements about BusyBox, such as "The BusyBox project maintained a list of projects which appeared to violate its license terms," it isn't OK for a statement like "Macsense HomePod appears to violate BusyBox's license." The article cites that page 17 times. If there are reliable, secondary sources which I missed, please point them out
— User:Pnm, 01:39, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)