Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Greathead
A  search turns up nothing notable enough to pass Wikipedia's chief notability requirement () that all other guidelines should adhere to. Until those requirements are altered it is what it is no matter what anyone likes, myself included. I am not saying the article should never have been created. Notability can be presumed because it meets the criteria of a SNG, in this case . It even says that in the notability guideline. The SNG states that the criteria does not mean an article should be kept but simply to be used as a "rule of thumb" for presumed notability. But when the subject is rebutted and a search is conducted and the results formed by a consensus is that the subject does not pass the notability guideline then the article does not belong. Thus this AfD. The results will be what they are. No need for attacking each other or hate filled responses
— User:Tsistunagiska, 16:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:N||WP:CRIN (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)