Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March Against Monsanto (2nd nomination)
do not merge any content, and allow for expansion.  The https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=March_Against_Monsanto&oldid=566206178 last good version of this article was in the process of undergoing 2x expansion from 20,000 bytes to 40,000 bytes with the addition of about 20 new sources before being disrupted by POV pushers and edit warriors yet again.  IRWolfie's deletion rationale is entirely false and based on an imaginative fantasy he invented that has no bearing on reality.  The sources in this article range from before the protests on May 8, 15, 19, 21, and 24, to the day of the protests on May 25, to after the protests on May 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 through June 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 19, and into July.  It does not fail WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE at all nor does it fail WP:INDEPTH, as we have numerous in depth coverage about the worldwide protests and the reasons for the protests.  Finally, there are ''no'' editors "contending" that the scientific consensus cannot be stated in this article without it being OR, that is another imaginative fantasy that IRWolfie made up.  The fact of the matter is, the scientific consensus has been stated ''multiple times'' throughout the last good version of the article ''using sources about the subject of the protests'', not off-topic sources about some other subject.  That's how  works. To prove this point, the last good version said, "Many scientists and U.S. government agencies maintain that GMOs are safe" (Associated Press), "people can be rest assured that GE foods are absolutely fine" (The Wellingtonian) and "Genetically modified crops are the most tested and regulated crops, and the scientific consensus about their safety is overwhelming." (The Maui News)  So, that's ''three'' examples of reliable secondary sources in the last good version of the article illustrating the scientific consensus ''without'' original research.  One must either assume that IRWolfie doesn't understand the English language or is deliberately making false statements in bad faith to get this article deleted
— User:Viriditas, 10:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)