Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entropy (energy dispersal)
subject to a thorough rewrite. As Jheald rightly says this approach does not contravene . As an introductory teaching method presented as being fully compatible with standard textbook stuff it has achieved notability both on the web and in a significant number of chemistry textbooks. I agree with Jheald that there should be a brief discussion of the usefulness and applicability of this method in the main entropy article, pointing to any critical analysis and limitations of this approach as well as noting what usefulness it may have for those who find thermodynamic entropy easier to understand when directly related to energy and temperature. This page has been cobbled together by "Sadi Carnot" as part of a vitriolic campaign to hide these ideas. It misrepresents the ideas at present, but can be improved to give a reasonable properly sourced explanation of the merits and demerits of the approach in more detail than is appropriate on the main page. #Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia|Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, and  requires that notable views should be represented fairly, proportionately and without bias, not censored so that only a particular orthodoxy is shown
— User:Dave, 18:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:No original research)