Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mythryl
ndash; Rather than accusing someone of trolling it would be of greater benefit to establish notability for the article.  As it stands the article lacks "non-trivial" |reliable sources.  A quick glance of GHits and GNEWS offers no independent, | verifiable |reliable sources. Sergey Shandar you may or may not be right that Christopher has not done little research on the language, but you offer no support to validate the article's notability.  Vorov2 you are right that obscurity when applied by an individual is not a reason for article deletion; however, overall obscurity is.  Again, what would be productive would be the application of "non-trivial", | verifiable |reliable sources
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)