Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MeKin2D
I can't find evidence in |reliable sources that this software has been widely adopted. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22MeKin2D%22 Two hits on Google Scholar, with one citation between them &mdash; that's simply not enough to go on. We cannot write articles without ''independent'' sources that indicate the significance of the subject matter. |Those sources might well exist in the future, but they don't exist now. None of the paywalled references written by people other than Simionescu concern this software in particular. Contrast this situation with, for example, PyMC3, a scientific software package that was AfD'ed not too long ago. In that case, there were book chapters written about the software, and plenty of scientific papers that used it
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)