Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colleen Cassady St. Clair
While the Google scholar results are not bad, they're not strong enough to convince me that she passes  #1 — I agree with Exzakin's "Cite-count is also unreliable" but to me that means we shouldn't rely on it to argue for a pass in cases like this where it's not clear-cut. I don't think the Telegraph/NYT piece's coverage (of her specifically) is nontrivial enough for , and it's only one piece (the wording is the same despite being in two different major papers). And I don't see any other reason to keep
— User:David, 03:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)