Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Artist Award (2nd nomination)
The coverage you've pointed to exemplifies the problems with this article. The first article is very brief coverage, offering very little other than an explanation of what the awards are. Examiner.com, as detailed in its article, offers " hyperlocal news websites (from) citizen journalists". If that's a |reliable source with a history of fact checking, I'm the Pope. The third article is essentially a passing mention in a local paper. (In that very paper, my father has received considerable coverage. He is not, in Wikipedia's terms, notable (sorry, Dad!).) You've outlined a path to a permanent stub
— User:SummerPhD, 01:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)