Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom4j
I'm surprised to vote to keep.  I'm usually a deletionist and my initial impression was this was another wikicruft  article.  I didn't find anything useful from a simple Google search.  But I agree with ElComandanteChe that Google books returns mentions that, if added to the article, would certainly establish notability.  The fact they aren't yet cited isn't a reason to delete
— User:Msnicki, 19:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CATALOG (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)