Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Plott
per nom and . Previous arguments regarding  don't acknowledge that  details ''additional'' criteria for notability, and that simply passing  isn't exclusively sufficient. Additionally, some aforementioned 'wealth of sources' such as blogs, Youtube links and opinion pieces aren't generally considered reliable sources. The canvassing is disappointing and I don't agree it was done in good faith - if the canvasser had assumed good faith himself, he would have trusted the Wikipedia community to make the correct decision without soliciting outside help
— User:TechnoSymbiosis, 00:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:ENTERTAINER (Wikipedia:Notability)