Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Edmonds
without prejudice against recreation if somebody without a conflict of interest can do a better job of writing something with some actual substance and citing some actual evidence of |reliable (i.e. non-|primary) sourcing to support it. University professors don't automatically get Wikipedia articles just because they have faculty profiles on the university's own website; they still need some form of reliable sourcing independent of their own employer. I'm willing to reconsider this if it sees the necessary improvement before this discussion closes, but absent that I favour the |blow it up and start over approach
— User:Bearcat, 22:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)