Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilot (Desperate Housewives)
and/or '''redirect''', or possibly '''keep'''. These episode titles are at least plausible search terms, which means redirection is an acceptable alternative to deletion, and as such, per |policy, deletion is unwarranted. The nominator says this set of articles "Breaks pisode" and yet the nominator has broken pisode by ignoring that guideline's very advice to "''Avoid listing episodes for AfD unless they are completely unverifiable and original research''". Why? The fact that these episodes are all available on DVD, some with commentary, shows that information in these articles is not "completely unverifiable", and there are even http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Desperate-Housewives-Contemporary-Television/dp/1845112202 published http://www.amazon.com/Welcome-Wisteria-Lane-Desperate-Housewives/dp/1932100792 books covering these episodes, which indicates that there may be enough reliable source material even for individual articles to satisfy notability
— User:DHowell, 05:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:E||WP:E (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)