Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia Dramatica (2nd nomination)
Sufficiently sourced, and appears to have non-trivial coverage in the so-called Real World - In my opinion, it satisfies ; even if it still could be somewhat better, it's still better than it was before. "May attack Wikipedians" argument is utter rubbish, as seen so many times before; Wikipedia's goal is neutrality, and I'd say that if the idea is to cover topics neutrally without opinionated comments, the other side of the coin would be to not limit ''inclusion'' to Wikipedia based on opinions, either; otherwise we'd have to start deleting articles like ''(Insert blatant unfurling if the Godwin Flag)'' neo-Nazism, because it happens to cover a topic that may promote hate toward a group of people. If we delete arguments based on that alone, where would you draw a line? Let's let go of the tiresome drama and let's quit trying to kill this article because of politics. The bottom line is this, no matter how you bake the cake: we set the bar somewhere and this thing narrowly leaps above it. If this thing gets deleted, I see it as a victory for evil wikilawyering of most foul kind, not as a victory for interpreting Wikipedia's content guidelines
— User:Wwwwolf, 09:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)