Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Particle
The nomination is a prime example of a bad idea, reckless, and a sign of why our Civilization is Eschatology|slouching towards Jerusalem.  Not only that, but it's in bad taste, as the article was just created earlier this month and a peek at the "history" tab would reveal that it was still under construction.  In any case, the |article has already been improved enough to keep.  "Particle" is a core idea in science and philosophy, and is incredibly well attested in thousands if not millions of |reliable sources.  The nominator could not have been |bothered with even a simple online search.  Such core ideas are also extremely necessary for our core readership, high school and college students.  WP:AfD is not the place to suggest fixes to |ugly articles. I can just see the headline in the tabloids: "Wikipedia eliminates particles; Climate change proven false
— User:Bearian, 00:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:HEY||WP:RS||WP:BEFORE||WP:UGLY (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)