Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flora Footbridge
Bridges are not handed an automatic notability freebie just because of who they're named after or what they happen to cross over — and GEOFEAT does not say that bridges get an automatic notability freebie just for existing, either, it says they're considered notable ''if they clear  on the sourcing''. But the sources here are a |primary source from the city's own website, the local neighbourhood pennysaver and a 148-word blurb in the local daily — which means two of them are not support for notability at all, while the third is a start toward getting this over GNG but ''not'' substantive enough to carry it over the finish line all by itself as the ''only'' GNG-eligible source in play. This doesn't necessarily have to have grand claims of architectural or historic uniqueness to qualify, though those certainly wouldn't hurt — the absolute minimum baseline that it has to meet is clearing GNG on the sources, but these sources aren't clearing GNG
— User:Bearcat, 14:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Notability)