Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Methodist Senior High School
https://books.google.pl/books?id=slmSNI3HdwgC&pg=PA62&dq=%22Christian+Methodist+Senior+High+School%22+Ghana&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj1wp2wzqvfAhWPCuwKHV4TA0MQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=%22Christian%20Methodist%20Senior%20High%20School%22%20Ghana&f=false My WP:BEFORE picked up a court injunction announced through a notice in the Ghanaian newspaper, Daily Graphic and https://www.graphic.com.gh/news/general-news/work-progresses-on-nkrumah-circle-interchange.html a piece from the Graphic's website that discusses the school's previous site, and https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/features/Is-Christian-Methodist-SHS-under-threat-561792 an article in Ghana Web (which appears to be a WP:NEWSORG), as well as an https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/I-was-called-invisible-in-school-Anas-394895# interview with an investigative journalist who appears to be prominent in Ghana who went to the school and describes some details of it, also from Ghana Web. I don't think the mentions in the Graphic do much more than substantiate the existence of the school, but the Ghana Web pieces appear to indicate potential notability.  is a bad argument by itself but it does indicate that, all other things being equal, we should lean towards keeping when we have sources that appear to be reliable and appear to potentially be . I'm still very tentative about this one because so much depends on things about Ghana that I have no knowledge of (is the journalist actually prominent? is Ghana Web actually an RS?) so I'd welcome input from editors with more knowledge of Ghana. EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQX2W_RbJxQ This TV news coverage appears to lock in notability, so switching to a firm keep
— User:FOARP, 10:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)