Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ophélie Bretnacher disappearance
It's clearly not a  for the simple reason that it is not a biography, it is a summary of a ''case'', and a pretty interestingly ramified one. BLP1E policy says: ''In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article.'' -But this ''is'' the event article already, so problem solved.  has no relevance here -the case is cleary |notable for several good news sources and it is not OTNEWS given the long time range of the coverage. I see no other OT concerns here (to answer JohnCD above). Also, the fact that "it is not uncommon that a person disappears and is found dead in unclear circumstances" is completely irrelevant: we do not judge if something is unusual or not, we judge if it is |verifiable, |notable and OT|appropriate for the encyclopedia. This article seems to satisfy all these requirements without problems
— User:Cyclopia, 14:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:N||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)