Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huang's law
The main sources bolstering this are not reliable.  One of which starts out by describing Moore's law as a "prediction" rather than an empirical observation (and later a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy).  This ''per se'' renders the source unreliable.  Another conflates the idea of transistor density (which is what Moore's law is actually about) with processor power (which is definitely isn't, and which is well-known).  There's also a lot of overly credulous and hyped-up treatment of the concept rather than serious analysis of it.  Maybe worst of all, that it's just not well-defined.  {{tq|"Huang's law claims that a synergy between hardware, software and artificial intelligence makes the new 'law' possible."}}  The law claims something that makes the law possible? Huh?  And there's still no clear statement of it.  All this, at the very very least, adds up to a case of .  If this really turns into a better-defined thing that people really refer to on a large scale, then come back to this in 5 or 10 years.  &ndash
— User:Deacon, 15:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)