Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qantas Flight 32
The incident '''does not''' meet WP:AIRCRASH - which I will quote verbatim - ''"If the accident or incident matches criteria '''only in this section''', then coverage should normally be on the article about the aircraft or airline"'' Criteria A1 (first in type) and A5 (grounding) are both in the same section, meaning that this info is more appropriately included in the A-380, RR Trent and Quantas pages, rather than it's own article. And while AIRCRASH is just an essay, it is the only current go-to project specific information for informing on the  portion of the  Guideline, which is the site-wide consensus backed interpretation of the GNG presumption and #NEWS policy for breaking news type articles, which this clearly is. And while this incident is for obvious reasons getting global coverage, it is far too early to say with any confidence or even proof, that this incident is not a basic violation of NOT#NEWS by meeting the  and  clauses of EVENT. Even in terms of , the case is weak (and no, in depth coverage in sources like the ''Aviation Herald'' as well as coverage in the news, does ''not'' count as diversity for air incidents
— User:MickMacNee, 14:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:EFFECT||WP:EVENT||WP:NOT||WP:INDEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:DIVERSE (Wikipedia:Notability)