Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silicone Sex World
The criteria for establishing independent requires a minimum of two references. It isn't that these references must be from reliable sources but they must also be "intellectually independent". As per , this specifically excludes references that base their article exclusively on company announcements and also further states ''Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.'' Not a single one of the references either in the article or that I can find online meet this criteria. The references either fail  as the article is more interested in the titillating aspect of the product and says nothing about the company (the subject of this article), or they fail  where the company is name-checked, or they fail  where the article fails to provide any original/independent opinion/analysis/fact checking/investigation that is clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated with the company. Notable too that the Keep !voters haven't produced any references despite request. Topic fails GNG and 
— User:HighKing, 20:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)