Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel Sharp
What at first glance appears to be a healthy wall of references is actually a number of |questionably reliable sources and passing mentions. Didn't win a high-level award and was not an ace, therefore I concur that deletion is likely the policy-based outcomehere...based on . The nominator is reminded that "fails " is ambiguous - it implies that that is the only/primary deletion reason, when it is entirely possible to fail SOLDIER but pass 
— User:The, 21:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)