Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Zaghab
edit conflict) There are a number of steps that could have been taken with these articles that would be far more appropriate and useful than merely tagging with {{tl|unreferenced}} and expecting that someone would magically come along and clean it up, then bringing it to AfD to be hurriedly looked over by a bunch of people who can't speak Arabic. One obvious thing would be to bring it to the attention of Wikipedia:WikiProject Palestine|WikiProject Palestine or other Arabic speakers. In practise, Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English is also sometimes used to request verification by a foreign-language speaker for articles which can't be sourced in English. On the other hand, |countering systemic bias is ''not'' a reason to keep non-notable or non-verifiable material, though it may be a reason to allow people more time to get sources, or to give more weight to GHits from countries with little Internet presence, or to recuse yourself from voting either Keep or Delete if you can't contribute usefully to the process of figuring out whether something is notable or not
— User:CaliforniaAliBaba, 00:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CSB (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)