Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear Skies (machinima)
and frankly my jaw is dropping at suggestions as vociferous as the nuclear option of "salt for one year" (!), which is a pretty extreme course of action reserved for spam, pagemove vandalism or persistently recreated junk, none of which this is.  Anyway,  is POLICY, yes,  the bedrock of Wikipedia.  But  is not an arbitrary, mathematical measure or binary yes/no equation to answer "should this article exist"?  The intent of  is to establish and verify that our articles are factual and accurate, and not sourced with error and misinformation.  It is not a |rule for the sake of rules, it is a rule to establish quality control.  Now, is there anyone here who seriously doubts the existence or factuality of what we have written, given the sources offered?  Are people asserting this could be a hoax or something two guys made up in class one day
— User:Fordmadoxfraud, 15:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:BURO (Wikipedia:Verifiability)