Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of how the average Wikipedia reader is currently moving
This must be the strangest way of testing the limits of Wikipedia:Avoid self-references, but linking these various ways in which people can be said to be 'moving' is not encyclopaedic. It's linking unconnected things in a way which suggests |original research, and is a list of coincidences. I wouldn't object to this as a user page or sub-page but it is not suitable for an article
— User:Sam, 23:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)