Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13th Child (3rd nomination)
basically every word in his deletion rationale is completely inaccurate. Also, there is an obvious lack of  if not more (apparently he did not even checked the RT link and the other sources currently in the article), the article was nominated just two minutes after starting another AfD. I would also note in a few hours the nominator voted for deletion in about 200 AfD, boldly redirected dozens of articles with the rationale "non notable on its own since 2008" and prodded dozens of others, generally spending one minute per article. I have not looked into them except for a couple, but if his carefulness is the same he showed here, a topic ban could be necessary
— User:Cavarrone, 12:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)