Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurent Schwartz (oncologist)
Despite the citation data, there is  a lack of independent, reliable secondary sources that I think we need, and are encouraged by , to determine if this person warrants an article. Two secondary sources are listed, but they fail provide sufficient depth of detail to support the notability of this person, or indicate that his research stands out from the pack. They are utiized to support the Biorebus section, but do not mention the company. I agree that the article is promotional in tone, that it stretches the facts to the breaking point ("Major achievements" should be "Areas of research") and that yes, the COI doesn't help one bit. Alleged and unsourced relationship to famous mathematician of the same name is inconsequential
— User:Coretheapple, 14:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)