Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Yavneh attack (2nd nomination)
Obviously the attack received international coverage and it is crystallballing to say that it won't further have coverage in future future (these cases do come around especially at sentencing time).  Nominate again in a couple of years, we'll see what the record says then.  Now, on the issue that "there were no deaths."  If this was somehow any sort of standard, then you would have to delete the "Cecil the Lion" article, as: (1) There were no human deaths (2) The courts ruled everyone was innocent: the U.S. hunter, the Zimbabwean hunt guide, etc.  I.e, there was never a case at all, only media and mass hysteria.  The bottom line is that the current standard is that notability is documented via  from media and authors and as the Yavne attack has plenty of  from media, people don't have a foot to stand on to argue for deletion
— User:XavierItzm, 20:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)