Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Dushku
The content of the article seems extremely trivial and lacking in-depth detail. Plus, it's clearly written to shed her in an overly positive light. The lead about her standing in Mormon feminism (however one gets that) is questionable, as there's nothing really later on in the article about it. Except that she was involved with a magazine that printed feminist articles, among other subjects. The thing about Exponent II is questionable to establish notability also because its just a none profit journal that isn't associated with the church and might not even be notable on it's own. She's notable by association of being one of 4 people that brought it back though. Let alone just for doing a column in it. There's nothing that applies just on her academic accomplishments either as she doesn't seem to have a had a significant impact on anything, hasn't held a highest level post, or accomplished anything else  mentions. Just being a professor doesn't qualify
— User:Adamant1, 09:49, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)