Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark E. Clayton
I'm not terribly convinced that quibbling over the definition of hate speech is the determinative issue here — ''queers'' get the final mic drop on what is or isn't anti-queer hate speech, and non-queers do not get to put us in the corner on the grounds that they somehow understand what we actually have to go through better than we do ourselves. But that's not really the determining factor: what's more dispositive here, rather, is that the sources show little evidence of enduring nationalized significance that would somehow make his candidacy ''more'' special than all the other unsuccessful candidacies in the history of politics. Out of fourteen sources total, eight are the purely expected level of local coverage that every candidate in every election can always show without fail, two more are |primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, and what's left is not enough to demonstrate that he would pass the |ten-year test for enduring notability. This is just not, in and of itself, enough
— User:Bearcat, 03:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:10YT (Wikipedia:No original research)