Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana S. Nau
Full disclosure: I am not Dana Nau, but I am one of his many former research students; it should be obvious from my edit history that I have only a passing familiarity with Wikipedia.  I assume (though I don't know) that Dsnpost was Dana Nau, and clearly any self-promotion in Wikipedia is fraught with peril.  That said, I read , and Dana Nau seems to qualify for notability rather easily, both by criterion 1 (see his http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3Anau+author%3Adana citation statistics, as well as the references to SHOP2 and some of his other work at Hierarchical task network) and, as a AAAI fellow, for criterion 3.  Philosophically, though, I don't know where Wikipedia stands on articles that should have been created, but probably not by the editor who created them
— User:Incremental, 19:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)