Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnljot Elgsaeter
Three papers with over 200 citations each, first author on each, and far and away the most cites in a search for "erythrocyte shape", convince me that he passes #C1. Looking for newspaper coverage is pointless and irrelevant as that's not where one expects to find coverage of academics. I improved the referencing of the article; it's still very weak, but a lot better than its previous nonexistent state
— User:David, 17:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)