Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TazaMart
There are two references that, in my opinion, just about meet the criteria for establishing notability. https://tribune.com.pk/story/1066664/a-comparison-of-pakistans-online-grocery-market/ This tribune.com.ok article just about meets the criteria as there is sufficient independent analysis/optinion on aspects of Tazamart's business. https://www.dawn.com/news/1242498/do-pakistans-online-grocery-stores-deliver-what-they-promise-we-find-out This dawn.com reference also just about meets the criteria and although it doesn't contain a lot of in-depth information, it has enough and it also provides independent opinion. But the others fail. https://aurora.dawn.com/news/1142052 This dawn.com article provides no in-depth information on the company and relies on information provided by the companies and others in the sector and does not provide any independent analysis or opinion, fails  and/or . https://www.brecorder.com/2016/03/30/287615/ This brecorder.com reference only namechecks the company, fails . I cannot find any other decent references
— User:HighKing, 15:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)