Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Hase
to Heutagogy. I previously argued for this article to be kept in Talk:Stewart Hase#Recognized by mainstream, reliable sources (books, magazines, etc.)|this discussion (which I recommend the other participants read, as it is directly relevant), but on reviewing the article again I have changed my mind. While  says "''criterion 1 can also be satisfied if the person has pioneered or developed a significant new concept, technique or idea ... in their academic discipline''", I concede DGG's point about the significance of the concept of heutagogy, given the WorldCat listings. Also, there doesn't seem to be any significant sourceable information that isn't already covered in the heutagogy article, meaning it would be hard to write a biography that didn't significantly duplicate the heutagogy article. I think that heutagogy passes , and if that article is kept I think that keeping this page as a redirect would be more useful than deleting it
— User:Mr, 10:27, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)