Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lateral coital position
or '''merge''' with the Woman on top article. Then someone should cut pieces of the content for quality and source the material well. But I must state that "related to Woman on top" does not mean "is the same thing as Woman on top." Looking on Google Books (without the "wikipedia" addition given for the search field above), it appears that Störm did not do a  job before nominating this article for deletion. There is enough material for the article to stand on its own or go the o page route. But the topic should be covered on Wikipedia. For example, https://books.google.com/books?id=Hk5ZBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA69 this "Discovering Your Couple Sexual Style: Sharing Desire, Pleasure, and Satisfaction" source, from Routledge, page 69, addresses history regarding the sex position
— User:Flyer22, 22:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:N (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)