Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocktail hat
The article seems to satisfy , barely by the references given and yet more obviously from the added info that Uncle G provided. On the other hand, I completely agree that AfD is not the place to attack a nominator; focus on why the article should be kept in your argument, not what the nominator's motivations might be. I do see why NeutralHomer might have nominated this for AfD because the article contains very little content and isn't heavy on the sources. On the other hand, Mathsci's comment about the article being "nonsense" is completely unjustified
— User:Atama, 17:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)