Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of country names in various languages (2nd nomination)
Abstaining for the moment, but I'm noticing that the Keep arguments seem to either (a) fail to address the deletion rationale or (b) rely on one of the |arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (e.g. it's useful, people put work into it, etc.). The issue isn't notability -- of course country names are notable. The issue is  (and I suppose ). Wikipedia isn't a dictionary, isn't a translation tool, isn't a list of "various" anything. It seems to simply be outside the scope of the project, whether or not it's useful or people put time into it. --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 04:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATADD||WP:NOT||WP:SALAT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)