Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major cricket (2nd nomination)
the original AfD eventually reached a fairly strong consensus that this was  and , and I don't believe anything has changed. There is definitely no reference anywhere to satisfy me that "major cricket" has been adopted in the four years since the previous AfD as a term with either a formal or a widely used conventional meaning encompassing the top non-international levels of each of the three forms of cricket. All of the content in this article which deals with the historical status of first-class cricket is already in first-class cricket, and sits much more appropriately there. Maybe redirect to forms of cricket
— User:Aspirex, 23:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)