Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Rogers Turner (2nd nomination)
Just to kinda seal this. Subject meets  because a) the text explains why she is notable, b) the text follows BLP guidelines, c) she is the primary subject of many reliable secondary sources - the article itself quotes The Globe and the Tennessean. As mentioned above, there are also sources available in Newsweek, the Washington Post, the New York times, etc, but there isn't necessarily a need to use them, as everything in the entry is referenced. She also meets the criteria of being a participant in a significant controversy covered by the media and she has been featured numerous times in the mainstream media. I think the more pressing question is...why do you argue that she is not notable? What is your reasoning
— User:Smashville, 13:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)