Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Murshidabad beheading
Nomination rationale consists of several things: objecting to the name (not a deletion reason), accusations of COI (not a deletion reason),  (not a deletion reason) and borderline personal attacks. It also consists of a  argument that this happens regularly (which I doubt), and is thus not remotely based on policy. This event did receive coverage a couple of years after the event: http://www.haindavakeralam.com/hkpage.aspx?PageID=10691&SKIN=B, although how reliable that is, I don't know (it doesn't seem too bad). Obviously the Kolkatta Telegraph is fairly local coverage, but if the Asian Age is reliable, then that evidently is not. There's also this http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=6935&SKIN=C. Add Hindi sources, which will surely exist, and I'm confident this passes 
— User:Lukeno94, 15:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)