Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International School of Gemology
The above material is interesting but I went looking for |reliable sources that talk about the notability of the school -- not its principal, not any controversies in which its principal or others might be embroiled -- and found nothing that contributed to |notability.  My personal view is that the material I found would not be sufficiently |reliable to assert notability on behalf of Robert James, but that is not what we're being asked to assess here.  I was unable to establish reliably that the school, in and of itself, was notable, according to the definition of "reliable sources" given by Wikipedia
— User:Ubelowme, 19:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)