Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overclock.net
but lean towards '''delete'''.  I don't see this as an article which is likely to grow into an article meeting wikipedia's standards.  Right now most of the facts in the article don't tell us much about the site (for example, that overclock.net got a press mention is great for them, but a mere mention is different from a secondary source which tells us about overclock.net).  The article also has severe problems with tone (along the lines of :Template:Advert and ), which could be an argument for Wikipedia:Cleanup, but that's going to be hard unless there are more sources to work from than we've seen so far
— User:Kingdon, 22:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)