Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Veracruz
per |DEL8 as lacking notability. Even accepting that the subject's awards satisfy PORNBIO, the coverage is much too thin to find notability. The SNGs and sub-guidelines, including PORNBIO, are for determining notability in debatable cases where there is some meaningful coverage, but it's unclear whether or not that coverage meets GNG; they should not be used to find notability where it is plainly lacking. ''See'' {{slink|WP:BIO|Additional criteria}} ("Meeting one or more additional criteria does not guarantee that a subject should be included."); |NRVE; ''cf.'' |WHYN. The closest thing to a qualifying source is the ''Fleshbot'' piece,Holly Kingstown, ''http://straight.fleshbot.com/6010017/twenty-questions-with-porn-star-vanessa-veracruz Twenty Questions with Porn Star Vanessa Veracruz'', Fleshbot (June 29, 2015), ''archived at'' https://archive.is/0LmrJ Archive.is but a single brief interview is not nearly enough, and I have grave doubts about Fleshbot's independence.{{r|Rebbing's Fleshbot note
— User:Rebbing, 04:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:DEL8||WP:NRVE||WP:WHYN (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)