Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Control races
I guess the confusing part is that we added http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Star_Control_races&diff=384324636&oldid=384262890 entire paragraphs worth of sources, which was the reason for this AFD. Reliable game reviews where 25% of the review talks about why the races and characters are so compelling. Then someone says we need sources for the individual sections, which flies in the face of |"Notability guidelines do not directly limit article content". Then someone http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Star_Control_races&diff=384828543&oldid=384823723 did that anyway. We've complied with every guideline and policy. But a few editors have teamed up to say that if even a few portions of the article are unsourced, we should '''delete the whole thing''', '''including the referenced facts'''. It flies in the face of every known policy. Not just  and , but  and  which says that you've satisfied the minimum standards of inclusion once you have third-party sources. On that note, I've done here. Go ahead and have the 
— User:Shooterwalker, 17:09, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NNC||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD||WP:V||WP:N||WP:LASTWORD (Wikipedia:Notability)