Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metadefinition
poorly written  by , with miscellaneous out-of-context quotes. There is a core  from mathematics (more succinctly expressed as something like "a meta-definition or definition schema is a rule for producing definitions" http://books.google.com.au/books?id=F__uAAAAMAAJ&q=%22a+meta+definition%22), but this dicdef does not need an article given the content already at metalanguage. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.223|202.124.73.223
— [[User talk:202.124.73.223|talk]]), 13:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:No original research)