Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in medicine
The topic of the article is certainly encyclopedia-worthy (although the word "important" does not seem to do the topic justice: perhaps "landmark" is better).  For instance, I don't think there can be any serious argument that ''De materia medica'' or the writings of Hypocrates are not "landmark" publications.  The general arguments (/) above are not compelling.  The question is, can a list on this topic ''in principle'' be referenced in a way that meets our core principles?  A quick Google search for "Landmark publications in medicine" turns up many promising sources on which to base an article (e.g., "Science and Technology in Medicine: An Illustrated Account Based on Ninety-Nine Landmark Publications from Five Centuries").  As for the subjectivity of the inclusion criteria, we have plenty of subjective articles without a problem: we just  and use sources
— User:Sławomir, 13:29, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:OR||WP:ASF (Wikipedia:Verifiability)