Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juni Cortez
I see no policy-oriented arguments for deletion and no evidence of an actual  - WP policy requires that AfD noms proceed on the basis of the notability of the ''subject'', not as demonstrated in the ''article''. This character is discussed (not as a TRIVIALMENTION) in such books as ''Mediated Boyhoods'' and ''Home Movies''  and has a whole chapter in ''Critical Approaches to the films of Robert Rodriguez'', as well as another in a doctoral thesis by Victoria Kearley. This clearly meets WP:GNG, and I am getting tired of people citing WP:FANCRUFT as if it were a policy and as if it gave guidance on notability issues. In-universe style in articles is a  issue, not a policy-based ground for deletion. Also, it is for the nominator and the Delete voters to do the , FFS
— User:Newimpartial, 21:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:FIXIT (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)