Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Begin (computer game) (2nd nomination)
Sources so far merely show |that it exists.  The PC-SIG reference seems to merely come from a vendor of classic games, and vendors are typically looked on as not being a |reliable source.  The first source (MobyGames) is used properly in the sense that it only supports who developed the game, but won't be enough with the PC-SIG reference to hold up the article.  The Home of the Underdogs reference again goes back to verifiability, but provides no |notability. The Audyssey Magazine reference seems to look good - I've never heard of this magazine, but it appears to have been in existence since the late 90s, and covers http://www.audyssey.org/ games for the visually impaired. I still feel like more critical coverage from |reliable sources is needed to pass |general notability guidelines. Right now there's one critical review an little-to-no coverage elsewhere. I did find one mention in a http://features.metacritic.com/features/2010/best-and-worst-star-trek-videogames/ Metacritic feature, but it's merely a mention of Begin and Begin 2.  With other, more significant references this could probably be added to increase notability, but isn't enough to help the article on its own
— User:Teancum, 11:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)