Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial controversy
After several days discussion, those w supporting on the article have shown themselves totally unwilling to remove the  of examples, or even provide NPOV references to them. Nor does it adequately discuss that calling things an AC is used as a way to sidetrack good arguments as well as bad--there is one sentence only saying that, and i wrote it. I conclude that the purpose of the article is possibly those very examples. this is not just a possible place for POV to accumulate--this is a place where POV will accumulate and has already. I'm not going to try to figure out which one or ones might be the point of it. An article on the subject is possible, but not based on this one. If kept, of course, I'll try to bring it to NPOV as best I can
— User:DGG, 10:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)