Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Berwick (2nd nomination)
See list at Talk:Jeff_Berwick#WP:SOURCES, plus a couple in section below.  I am happy to work on the article-rewrite, but do agree there are some BLP-issues at play here (talkpage has some examples of negative commentary by editors who apparently have real-world very strong opinions).  I've never heard of this BLP-subject, but the sources are often glowly-positive and/or fiery-negative, from what I've seen; getting the NPOV balance right, of reflecting what the wiki-reliable sources say, with due weight, will be a bit tricky.  Still, I think this is a keep, easily passes WP:GNG, ''as long as'' there are enough long-haul wikipedians willing to watchlist the page going forward, and act as |long-term stewards of the rewritten version, to keep it from degenerating into a pro-Berwick puff-piece *or* an anti-Berwick hit-piece.  There are potential real-world-legal-repercussions, to either kind of degeneration-mistake.  p.s.  The first AfD mentions some kind of yacht-accident, covered in pre-2005 newspapers, so coverage bursts are stockhouse.com (hypothetical), yacht-sinking, guests on podcast, chilean real estate, bitcoin ATMs, expat passports, and libertarian campaign, plus background-details like DOB and such. Special:Contributions/75.108.94.227|75.108.94.227
— [[User talk:75.108.94.227|talk]]), 14:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OWN (Wikipedia:Ownership of content)