Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Dunn (2nd nomination)
some of the comments arguing a failure of  are laughable. The individual in question has been the subject of detailed news reports in national newspapers such as ''The Independent'' which undeniably qualify as reliable sources. The reason for the coverage is no doubt due to this man's longevity in non-league football, for which he is clearly considered by such sources to be newsworthy. Admittedly some of the sources are routine coverage, but notability is . I would summarise that this is a classic tale of , where a number of editors have cooperated to justify this inclusion on Wikipedia since its deletion in the last AfD three weeks ago, when he was deleted for failing GNG. I finish with the assertion that this can no longer be considered the case
— User:Cloudz679, 15:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:HEY (Wikipedia:Notability)