Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Joseph Didier (2nd nomination)
I found it difficult to navigate through the fine points under , because, as written it is difficult to see if this person has or has not met the Wikipedia definition of notability.  I took a look at otability (criminal acts), which, while not yet a policy, deals directly with this article, and does so in a way that I think is wise.  If you look under victims otability (criminal acts)#Victims, it states that a victim of a crime in and of itself does not meet notability, even if they are the subject of a multitude of articles.  I suspect that someone is writing this policy to address this issue.  So, even if this article survives AFD, it may one day be in violation of , and get deleted anyhow.  My personal opinion is that it does not meet the guidelines to meet encyclopedic notability, even if there is some current loophole that might somehow let it on here .... for the moment
— User:LonelyBeacon, 07:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N||WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)