Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradhan senadhipati
A misconception might be "realistic potential for expansion" but WP:notability|'''notability''' is a main criterion for inclusion. Since I can assume that many readers or editors may not have the ability to access Nepali |sources then someone needs to |''prove it''.  "Unsourced since 2006" would be valid on two points, 1)- it is unsourced, and 2)- it has flown under the radar for a long time but now this has been contested. A Wikipedia:NEGLECT|''"PrettyPleaseWithACherryOnTop"'' keep reasoning is also ineffective. This issue involves the |fundamental principles of Wikipedia. An argument that an unsourced article "might" improve Wikipedia, as a possible reason to |"ignore the rules", and some editors seemingly alright with unsourced articles, does not currently enjoy broad community |consensus so we generally follow the WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines. If an editor wishes to find at least one (more of course preferable) reliable independent source (not a |primary only) and |add it then ping me and I might consider changing my mind as well as possibly even others
— User:Otr500, 05:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROVEIT||WP:5P2||WP:IGNORE||WP:HEY||WP:sources||WP:consensus||WP:primary (Wikipedia:Verifiability)