Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lipid hypothesis
An article about one aspect of one viewpoint will, to some extent, emphasize that viewpoint.  For example, we have a separate article on Young Earth creationism.  It states that mainstream science rejects creationism but doesn't go into detail about the evidence favoring evolution.  Noting the rejection by mainstream science conforms to the policy of  that we state facts about opinions.  In my rewrite of Lipid hypothesis, I stated that the opinion underlying the use of the phrase is not the generally accepted one.  Perhaps that point should be amplified?  I don't think this article is the best place to put the whole discussion of the enormous mounds of evidence, but the article might be augmented by a citation to a source saying what you say (and what I believe to be true), namely that this phrase is the terminology of the opposition and that the scientific consensus is to the contrary
— User:JamesMLane, 20:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)