Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert E. W. Hancock
Obvious pass of #C1 (14 publications with over 1000 citations each; over 100 would already be good enough), multiple pass of #C2 (OBC, Prix Galien, Michael Smith Prize, and McLaughlin Medal among others), multiple pass of #C3 (FRSC, Fellow IDSA, Fellow AAM, Fellow CAHS), likely multiple pass of #C5 (Canada Research Chair and Killam Professorship). Any one of these by itself would be good enough. Speedy because the nominator doesn't appear to have even attempted to consider our academic notability guidelines, instead basing the nomination on sourcing (GNG, the wrong notability criterion for academics) and doing even that part wrong ( requires searching for outside sources, not merely evaluating the sources present in the article, and many of the sources already present in the article are independent of the subject and his employer). There is some promotional language in the article but not so much as to make it worthy of deletion; 
— User:David, 21:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BEFORE||WP:DINC (Wikipedia:Notability)