Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TiDB
Two of the references in the article pertain to NewSQL, preceding and not mentioning this particular product. The remainder are a mix of online postings and presentation materials from |primary sources. None of these satisfy the requirements. (In answer to the query above, there would not be a problem with Chinese language sources, but they would need to be |reliable 3rd party sources.) Clearly this is a developing product but it looks at best  to demonstrate achieved encyclopaedic notability. The product is mentioned on the :NewSQL page which is sufficient (even then, preferably supported by a reliable 3rd party source
— User:AllyD, 12:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:PRIMARY||:WP:RS||:WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:No original research)