Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krystal Meadows
Per John Pack Lambert. otability|non-notable issues and unsourced subject. I have no problem removing IMDb as an unreliable reference. The use in the "External links" section, as a back-door reference, does not make the site any less unreliable nor the article any more sourced, since a source must be |reliable. It might have worked at one point but not recently that I know of. I don't have a problem with the use of IMDb (especially comtemt from the WGA), just not the inundation of every related article, regardless if the site offers {{tq|a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article. In other words, the site should not merely repeat information that is already or should be in the article}}, especially when "user-submitted" content
— User:Otr500, 01:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)