Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shemayel (2nd nomination)
Does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (people) nor  ("the article itself must document notability through the use of reliable sources"). This is a 2006 |unsourced |BLP that could have been BLP-prodded.  states: {{tq|Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether the ''English language Wikipedia'' should have a separate, stand-alone article on that subject.}}, which means that any notability standards of ar.wiki are not applicable.  states: {{tq|The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability.}}, added with : {{tq|If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate. ''However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive'', especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface.}} This article has existed in contempt of policies and guidelines
— User:Otr500, 11:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NMUSIC||WP:UNSOURCED||WP:BLP||WP:WHYN||WP:NRVE||WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Notability)