Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Herrmann (2nd nomination)
on the grounds that the previous AFD was little more than a month ago. Articles should be given at least a few months to allow potential improvement before renomination. I have no personal opinion one way or the other on this particular article; this is a procedural "vote". I'm citing the third paragraph of  that says sufficient time should be allowed for an article to be improved upon after it has survived an AFD challenge
— User:23skidoo, 13:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)