Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strutt Family Trust
This is actually quite weird.  If you look at the sources thrown up by a Google search, most are press releases or press release-type articles hosted on self-publishing sites and several of these almost look doctored to get the Trust's name in afterwards.  For example, http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/4388237-strutt-family-trust-it6942002-invests-heavily-in-british-american-tobacco-plc-lse-bats-amex-bti-klse-bat-is-a-leading-global-tobacco-company-it-is-based-in-london-united-kingdom-and-is-a-constituent-of-the-ftse-100-index this one is supposedly about the Trust's investment in British American Tobacco, but the article is amateurish and the only mention of the Trust is in the title, where the words "Strutt Family Trust (IT694/2002) invests heavily in" have been tacked on to the beginning of the first sentence with no attempt even to adjust the grammar to make it read correctly.  I can't find a single primary or secondary source that provides any concrete, authoritative information at all about this organisation, so by definition it fails .  And the support above, which appears to boil down to "we want this article in order to provide a platform for charity fundraising", does not address doubts about notability or verifiability.  The Times online article cited by Bfigural is the nearest you get to a solid source.  Interesting that it's all about a hoax. Sockpuppet investigation probably a good idea
— User:Karenjc, 21:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)