Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boy's surface/Proofs (2nd nomination)
per #A5. The declined prod shouldn't prevent the speedy deletion. I agree with Carl — some proofs are significant enough to deserve their own articles, and others are short and illuminating enough to be worth including within articles on other subjects, but this is neither
— User:David, 01:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)