Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakob + MacFarlane
The appropriate guideline is not  as that is only for professional persons and not companies. Rather, the appropriate guideline is  which states that the criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Also, |notability is not inherited so while some references may talk about the buildings architected by the firm, that does not automatically convey notability on the firm itself. Also, profiles on either Jakob or MacFarlane may provide a case that either or both of the architects are notable in their own right, but does not mean that the firm itself is notable. That leaves us with the award from Les Globes in 2007 where the firm won "Best Architect". I do not believe the awards themselves are notable and in my opinion this award doesn't push the firm over the line into notability on its own. What is required are sources that actually talk about the company and there doesn't appear to be any. There is more material to create articles individually for Jakob and MacFarlane that for this company. Since references fail the criteria for notability, topic is not notable, fails GNG/NCORP
— User:HighKing, 13:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NOTINHERIT (Wikipedia:Notability)