Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithra Siriwardena (2nd nomination)
This subject can not be considered otable by any stretch of the imagination. Arguments for or against oldier are irrelevant because there is absolutely no "automatic inclusion clause but all articles are to depend on "significant coverage in independent, secondary sources". This applies to Wikipedia:ANYBIO and , that states, ''"People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. This is supported by the policy Wikipedia:Verifiability and the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. This article is lacking on all counts
— User:Otr500, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:S||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)