Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality of Robert Baden-Powell (4th nomination)
Content is already summarized in RBP main article, and is barely shorter than this spin off.  So it is clearly a content fork, but is it worth keeping?  The sources as represented present content so speculative as to be nearly unencyclopedic.  I mean, I almost laughed, ''he's saying that based on *what*?''. Bayes' theorem|Given the intensity of that corner of scholarship which tries to identify anything nonheteronormative in famous historical figures, if this is the best that can be done the topic is clearly non-notable, deserving one or two sentences (not paragraphs) in the main article at best.  Basing this much prose on such |indiscriminate ponderings is extraordinarily |undue
— User:Baccyak4H, 20:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)