Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donofrio v. Wells
or (less preferable) '''Delete'''. This case did attract a certain amount of media attention, although virtually no one in the mainstream media took it seriously; but I'm sympathetic to the  arguments that in six months' time, it will have been forgotten entirely. As the Supreme Court refused to hear the case, I don't think there's a strong argument for keeping this as a separate article; but it would be appropriate, I believe, as part of a larger article on rumours/conspiracy theories about Obama (or even as part of his article, though there would be definite  issues there). That would probably be the best way of handling this, preferable to outright deletion
— User:Terraxos, 09:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)