Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zbyszek Zalinski (2nd nomination)
The fact that the article hasn't been improved since the first discussion is not a deletion criterion in and of itself — but what is more determinative is that the ''reason'' it hasn't been improved is because there ''aren't'' any genuinely solid sources to improve it ''with''. Two of the three sources here are a |primary source and a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article whose core subject is something else, neither of which are support for notability — and while there is one source that's both reliable and non-trivially about him, even just a basic GNG pass requires ''more'' than just ''one'' such source
— User:Bearcat, 17:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)