Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockwood Village, Mississauga
An article about Burnhamthorpe (a recognized official city neighbourhood) would likely be appropriate, as long as it was |reliably sourced, and could include a bit of information about this subdivision — but  only ''guarantees'' notability to the city of Mississauga itself, while neighbourhoods or subdivisions within the city are eligible for their own standalone articles ''only'' if they can be well-referenced to enough reliable source coverage to clear GNG. The residents association's own |self-published website about itself is ''not'' a reliable or notability-supporting source, either — it's a directly affiliated organization, not an independent or notability-assisting media outlet. And the references present in the article aren't helping either: it's referenced to more primary sources, not any evidence of notability-boosting reliable source coverage. Even the three "Kathleen A. Hicks" citations are to documents published by the Mississauga Public Library, not to real media, and are not about Rockwood Village either, but other parts of Mississauga. And no, it isn't our job to facilitate the publication or retention of information unpublished or unavailable anywhere else, either: we're an encyclopedia, not a free web host, so our job is not to help undercovered topics create media visibility they don't already have
— User:Bearcat, 20:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GEOLAND||WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)