Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speculation that Iapetus is artificial
Doesn't the title of the article scream  and ?  Re-reading the article, the 2nd paragraph, which leads to a source, is documented by a known conspiracy theorist.  Personally, I think it's  if a consipracy theorist is trying to claim a conspiracy on a specific subject...doesn't really count as a source IMO
— User:sumnjim, 16:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:POV||WP:POV (Wikipedia:No original research)