Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vatican conspiracy theories
I agree that the theories are largely rubbish, but they are out there.  Some of them may be  by a single person, who has given them little publicity.  Others are widely believed even though they are unsubstantiated trash.  A few appear already to have their own articles.  Others do not.  The objective should be to provide sources for the theory as propounded and for its refutation.  One of the problems is that once some one has propounded an error, it is liable to get repeated.  I agree that the article is not (yet) adequately sourced, but that is a reason for improving it, not one for deleting it
— User:Peterkingiron, 13:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)