Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snatch Game (2nd nomination)
per Bearcat. The present version of this page more than passes muster for being "substantially different" from the previously deleted version, most notably due to the significant increase in breadth and quality of sources, additional context, and substantive expansion of the prose. It does not even come close to meeting  or other speedy deletion criteria. The present article is sourced with reputable, well known , including ''TV Guide'', ''Mic (media company)|Mic'', ''Vulture.com|Vulture'', ''The Atlantic'', ''The Guardian'', ''HuffPost'' and ''Gay Times''. If there is still doubt about whether the subject meets , why not just expand the article with academic literature about Snatch Game? A superficial Google Scholar search turns up numerous mentions of the subject in peer-reviewed journals, including https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/qsmpc/2018/00000003/00000002/art00001 this article, which focuses ''specifically'' on Snatch Game—not even on ''Drag Race'' in general. Other such articles (e.g. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/scp/2016/00000001/00000001/art00005# this one) reference and contextualize the segment. I don't have time to do content work right now, but I'm happy to provide access to sources behind a paywall for anyone who would like to expand this article
— User:Armadillopteryx, 20:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:G4||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)