Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Snapchat hack
as I argued on this one's DYK submission, I can't help but feeling that this article may violate  and , and that its content should be integrated in the Snapchat main article. I mean, just how important is this |in the scale of things? Sure, there has been a "good" level of coverage in the world's press, but I being reported in the media #NEWS|doesn't make it encyclopaedic. It is just one very very small episode in the era of internet security glitches, and ought not to be an excuse to create an article for DYK that may damage the company. If Snapchat was a person (yea, I know it isn't), WP:BLP would make us highly circumspect about creating such an article. More customer data has been hacked from Adobe and many others, or more data innocently "lost" by Mastercard, than this little company. Even if this causes the company to fold, which it won't, the text belongs in the parent
— User:Ohconfucius, 14:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)