Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number of the Beast (occurrence)
Massive |OR and a virtually infinite topic raising huge notability and POV issues any direction you turn. ... And if, as another editor suggested, it's a split-off from the original article, then instead of returning it to the original article there needs to be a synthesized discussion about the matter with a few particular examples. For instance "Sometimes used intentionally in popular culture, as in x and y, by producers seeking to garner additional publicity for their work. Some have suggested carries hidden messages or has actual religious significance; for example in these works, commentators A and B suggested that producers inserted intentionally, although that was disputed. Other times the very existence of the item has been disputed, as in the famous satanic grilled cheese." In other words, ''prose''. There's just no reason to list these things
— User:Lquilter, 16:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)