Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walden Three
please don't imply that failing  is a reason for deletion. It is a reason to remove the unreliably sourced material. Additionally, the article does have sources. They may not be independent, objective sources, but they are reliable for basic information about the project. Also, I see no signs of  in this article. Please don't http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/OVEREGG overegg the argument.  is sufficient to see this article deleted
— User:Carcharoth, 09:39, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)