Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YesAllWomen
Per nominee's suggestion that it fails , this is a recent subject (2-3 weeks old), and I think it's too soon to assess whether it had a lasting effect. Meanwhile, general notability guidelines suggest a presumption of notability based on the very significant coverage in many very well known reliable sources cited in the article. I think deletion based on  or , in this case, will require a longer period with which to assess the subject in a historical context. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/05/27/how-yesallwomen-became-trivial-a-noble-hashtag-loses-its-bearings.html This Daily Beast column, which makes the argument three days after its inception that the hash tag had "jumped the shark", also acknowledges that "#YesAllWomen isn’t just a hashtag; it’s a social media movement", suggesting that that there may be some effect distinct from the initial hashtag creation. I think time will make this clearer, one way or the other
— User:Agyle, 19:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LASTING||WP:LASTING||WP:ONEEVENT (Wikipedia:Notability)