Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of music
Deletion is ''definitely'' not cleanup. Being the main article for a category definitely reinforces my point of view. The subject of the article is encyclopedic, despite the tone similar to an essay. The arguments presented by the advocates for the deletion of this prove unpersuasive. The reason that I marked strong in here is because of the fact that |GNG is ''easily'' met, a shown by https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=%22Censorship+of+music%22&tbm=nws&gws_rd=cr&ei=I_y4WPfoBanZ0gLVzqa4Dw https://www.google.co.nz/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Censorship+of+music%22&gws_rd=cr&ei=MPy4WNeqEuWa0wKO-q6wDg https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Censorship+of+music%22. I thoroughly encourage keep advocates to strengthen their Wikipedia:Glossary#!vote|!votes and for proposers of deletion to reconsider
— User:J947, 05:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)