Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of opponents of same-sex marriage in the United States (2nd nomination)
If reliable sources publish similar sorts of lists -- and thus show it to be a notable list topic (beyond just the subject of opposition/support) -- then as long as there's also a clear criteria for inclusion, I don't think  would apply. The real question to me (and what Nwlaw63 might be getting at with "singling out individuals") is . If we limit it to public figures and cite sources sufficient to satisfy BLP requirements, I don't think there's a problem with "singling out individuals" who take well-documented, public positions, but we do have lots of articles about various pieces of legislation, timelines, campaigns, controversies, etc. such that it's not entirely clear to me whether there's a need for these lists (whether they're POVFORKs). However, this is not like Supporters and Opposers of Iran Nuclear Deal. That was a single event/deal, so any fork is clearly going to be a POVFORK and the coverage of supporters/opponents will be limited to a narrow span of time, with no certainty coverage will persist. Same-sex marriage, on the other hand, is a huge issue that has spanned many years. Another question worth asking is whether there are other issues for which we have such lists. Yes, yes,  (or doesn't), but it may shed some light on what consensus has been in the past. I'll note that it looks like we have list of abolitionists and list of slave owners but no list of proponents of slavery or equivalent that I can find. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 15:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:POVFORK||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)