Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Lewinsky
His contributions as a photographer do not pass muster because sourcing seems to be limited to a few one-off briefs in local or narrow specialty outlets, like http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/health&id=6297515 KABC-TV, the Los Angeles ABC affiliate, or http://www.jewishjournal.com/health/article/doctor_calms_radiation_fears_with_nature_photos_20090310/ jewishjournal.com. (I think sourcing requirements for photogs are more akin to those shown in articles on, for example Tina Barney, where coverage is in mainstream outlets or national publications, like http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950CE2D71530F932A35755C0A9619C8B63 NYT.) After a more detailed examination of his published research, I conclude that  #1 is also not satisfied. WoS shows 33 papers in the area of cancer with h-index 15. Of these, 9 of the 10 most highly cited seem to have been spearheaded by Melvin Silverstein, who was the corresponding, as well as first author. Lewinsky would appear to have played a supporting role for these. Although Lewinsky was first author on the 10th paper, it appears that http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142%28197403%2933:3%3C778::AID-CNCR2820330325%3E3.0.CO;2-T/pdf Munro Neville was the leader there. (It is a somewhat counter-intuitive convention in biology research that the ''last'' author is often the intellectual spearhead, which is the case here.) Without making this too much of a prolix !vote, one can proceed further down the list of publications, concluding that Lewinsky basically played supporting roles on the highly-cited papers. Down at the 18th paper (in order of citations) appears to be a study that Lewinsky led: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360301676901310 Lightcast: An aid to planning, treatment and immobilization in radiotherapy and research by Lewinsky and Walton, but this paper has only been cited 10 times since its publication 35 years ago. Citations rapidly tail-off after this point. I think these figures conclusively show that, while Lewinsky may be a good clinician, he is not a cancer researcher of any real note. Thanks
— User:Agricola44, 22:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)