Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill people
I am not familiar with an ''"overview index page"''. |Synthesis: ''"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources., which would be |original research (OR) amounting to |"what Wikipedia is not" as an |indiscriminate collection of information and accordingly the article fails to be |notable. Being ''well sourced'' does not justify editors "presenting their own points of view in articles.". If one area and group of people (hill people) are added to the article, unsupported by source, it is OR. Stating "After this discussion is closed I may add some information on hill people in general.", boldly assumes that a consensus will deem it is alright to keep an article because it may be cool, even possibly somewhat "informational", or maybe just because |we like it. If the article is to remain without being a blatant violation then |prove it by |significant coverage, in |reliable sources that are |independent and directly in support of the subject, meaning discussing the collection of "hill people". Like it or not these are policy and guideline based reasoning. If we don't like those this is not
— User:Otr500, 16:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:OR||WP:NOTESSAY||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:PROVEIT||WP:SIGNIFICANT||WP:RELIABLE||WP:notability||WP:independent (Wikipedia:No original research)