Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Functional temporalism
fails .  It is very rare, if not unheard of, that a technical term, however obscure, does not show up ''somewhere'' in google scholar.  This one succeeds in getting zero hits across the entire web, if wikis and similar are filtered out (I have a CSE doing this for me). No one denies that there are good sources to be had offline, but none have been put forward.  Not even the name of a proponent (or a critic) so we can look up their work.  At best this would seem to be a neologism
— User:Spinningspark, 20:50, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)