Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Williams Record (second nomination)
there are 2 issues I must deal with - Firstly the assertion that we should keep this article or delete all college newspapers is but a variant of |"other crap exists", and is not a valid argument to keeping or deleting everything in a given category. There is a pretty big difference between "all college journals are not notable" and "not all college journals are notable". Secondly, while the independence of the journal may give it the right to a separate article, continued existence on wiki is still contingent on editors establishing its |notability, and furnishing sufficient |references from |reliable sources to support same. Right now, the article fails to do it in a pretty big way. I would agree that if it is a truly independent journal, the article should be deleted, otherwise, a merger would  still be possible
— User:Ohconfucius, 05:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:N||WP:CITE||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)