Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gujadhur
It's certainly within the realm of possibility that a genuinely good and properly referenced article could be written about this family, so no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody's willing to put in enough work to make the article good and properly referenced — but this, as written, is semi-advertorialized and poorly referenced fluff. Two of its three footnotes are |primary sources that do not assist notability at all, and the third is a book which glancingly namechecks the family's existence in a quote from a person who married into it — so even the one acceptable reliable source is still ''not'' substantive or independent enough to singlehandedly  this topic all by itself as the ''only'' non-garbage source in play
— User:Bearcat, 17:59, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)