Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Angel (2nd nomination)
widely seen (cough) with this pseudonym featured, but not particularly notable in her niche.  The article has no citations of media coverage even by niche magazines like Adult Video News, let alone |reliable sources.  Regardless of what the notability proposal ends up with, erotic models (especially Web-only ones) need more than their own website and frequent links on the daily-free-teasers lists to make me consider them WP-worthy
— User:Barno, 22:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)