Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Oaks Baptist School
I think the reporting on the school's e-mail system makes a big deal over very little, and in general, the article seems like a grab-bag of media mentions.  But that's not the issue here -- the issue is  and specifically  (since HS doesn't apply.)  You make no mention whatsoever of awards won, when these might actually be pivotal to the Keep case.  You also don't establish that the ROBS library was given as a merely "typical" example.   It might have been singled out as an example of good library design practice.  And by putting "this school has a quite typical school library" in quotes, you might lead some editors here to think the book actually says that (or some such thing).  It doesn't.  The subtitle of the book ("Drawing on Function and Appeal"), and the lack of any particular criticism of ROBS library in the book's discussion, suggest that this library actually ''was'' selected on the grounds of distinctive "function" and "appeal".  The library coverage, together with details on its (soon retiring) chief administrator and its awards, is part of a case that this is a notably ''excellent'' middle school.  Can you supply more detail on how you believe ROBS fails 
— User:Yakushima, 04:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:ORG||WP:NHS||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)