Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional child prodigies (2nd nomination)
there are certainly enough sources that speak of fictional child prodigies as a group to meet  both provided in the article https://bookriot.com/books-about-child-prodigies/ and https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2009/may/11/fictional-children-geniuses more. My main issue is that the term 'child prodigy' is not concrete enough which is probably why the article has become a dumping ground lacking citation for many of those included in the list. The sources must actually assert that the character is a child prodigy. This is probably  but I am not sure it is worth or encycopeadic to trawl through sources to find one that calls the character a prodigy just to justify inclusion. I think a ''Fictional Child Prodigies'' section would be better on the Child prodigy page with a paired down list. Happy to see '''Delete''' too due to my general dislike of these kind of useless lists
— User:Vladimir, 03:33, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NLIST||WP:FIXABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)