Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 Hour Propane People
the vast majority of the articles are completely unsourced and consist only of a plot summary. Wikipedia articles should #PLOT|not simply be plot summaries. Other sections included in several of the articles are "Trivia" and "Cultural References", this is almost all unsourced, unencyclopaedic |original research and |synthesis - Wikipedia is #OR|not a publisher of original thought. In the very few articles that sources are given they are almost always not |reliable (such as IMDB or TV.com) or not independent (such as DVD commentries or comments from the creators of the series). The articles therefore show no evidence that the episodes meet the standards of |notability - having recieved significant coverage by reliable, independent secondary sources - required for inclusion.  states ''"If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."'', it is unlikely such sourcing could be found for the vast majority - and prehaps all - of these episodes/articles. It might be appropriate to |merge some information into the main King of the Hill article such as the awards won by And They Call It Bobby Love and Bobby Goes Nuts (if reliable sources that verify the information can be found) but even these accolades are unlikely to have given rise to the significant coverage required to confer notability to the individual episodes themselves
— User:Guest9999, 15:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:SYN||WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:NN||WP:V||WP:MERGE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)