Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli occupation of the West Bank
and obviously so. You can't have a POVFORK from multiple pages, and beyond that, this article is currently at 120 kB of readable prose. It cant be merged in to its parent article (which is West Bank). The personal attacks in the nomination notwithstanding, this is an obviously notable topic, with sources very specifically treating this as its own topic. The idea that because it deals with a topic that the nominator finds uncomfortable means it is propaganda is kind of funny but not at all important. One of the more obvious keeps in the history of AFD. An obviously notable topic, one which currently has 295 reliable sources cited dealing explicitly with this topic. The most basic  search, if that were even necessary given the number of sources already cited, https://www.google.com/search?q=israeli+occupation+%22west+bank%22&rlz=1C1CHMO_enUS561US561&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiDuLS6k6XgAhUDuRoKHajFCZkQ_AUIFCgB&biw=1920&bih=938 would disabuse somebody of the notion this is not its own topic. Some users dont want the Israeli occupation covered. That is a position that is fine for an individual to hold. It is however not one that is relevant to the goal of building an encyclopedia. As far as the patently silly claim that the sources are "cherry-picked" or "POV", please, look at the source list. Among the 295 sources, 28 are published by some university press. 72 of them are from peer-reviewed journals. The rest mostly from top-class publishers like Routledge, Brill, and Taylor & Francis. This article is sourced to the very best available reliable sources. Some people just dont like what the sources say
— [[User talk:Nableezy|nableezy]]''' -, 17:43, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)