Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Sridhar
My presumption would be that a full professor at the Tata Institute would be notable, but of course that's not a policy-based argument. And it's a little hard to search because there are other people named "K. Sridhar" with highly-cited publications. But I'm seeing Google scholar citation counts of 276 ("Quarkonium production in hadronic collisions"), 187 ("New LEP bounds on B-violating scalar couplings"), 167 ("Fragmentation contribution to quarkonium production"), 156 ("New LEP constraints on some supersymmetric Yukawa interactions"), 114 ("Getting to the top with extra dimensions"), 108 ("Next-to-leading order QCD corrections"), etc., which should be good enough for #C1 even in a high-citation field. In addition, the major-newspaper reviews of his novel (thanks for adding these
— User:EricEnfermero, 03:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)