Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noynoying
Clearly passes  based on references, many of which are specifically about noynoying and are independent, reliable newspapers. Although we must tread carefully when dealing with articles on attacks on public figures, clearly the purpose of the article is to document the attack, rather than be an attack in itself. I read it over and I don't see any unsourced criticism of the figure (so no substantial  issues) and quite a lot of it is dedicated to defenses against the attack, to the point where I don't think POV is an issue either. Counterarguments based on , Wikipedia:Civility, etc. make no sense as those are policies for editor behavior, not article content. (Note: article does appear to have been improved substantially since deletion discussion was opened - at that time it looked like http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Noynoying&oldid=482731738 this
— User:Dcoetzee, 04:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:NPA (Wikipedia:Notability)