Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Napolis
repeated mention in multiple news sources, popular magazines and scholarly books.  Sails pass , has significant coverage (numerous articles exclusively about her and her actions both as an on-line presence in the satanic ritual abuse phenomenon and for celebrity stalking) in reliable, secondary sources (People (magazine)|''People'', ''The San Diego Union-Tribune'', books by scholarly publishing houses), well independent of the subject.  Easily enough for a stand-alone article.  Note that Napolis is famous for at least ''two'' things - her on-line presence in the SRA circumstances (resulting in news articles and books covering how her identity was revealed and her impact on personal privacy concerns) and for stalking two extremely high-profile celebrities (four more news articles).  As for harm to the subject - everything is sourced, wikipedia is not therapy, pages are not deleted because they might hurt someone's feelings, and consider the impact of Napolis' past (and future) accusations against, say, Elisabeth Loftus, Carol Hopkins and Michael Aquino.  Loftus has been attacked at conferences based on accusations revolving around the SRA moral panic.  Keep, utter, utter keep.  I regularly monitor the page, and have never seen evidence of Napolis editing the page via sock puppets (however, the permabanned
— User:ResearchEditor, 02:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)