Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human disguise (2nd nomination)
per our |deletion policy which states, "''Renominations shortly after the earlier debate are generally closed quickly. It can be |disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hopes of getting a different outcome.''"  and this is clearly a |disruptive renomination of this sort.  As for the article, it continues to improve and has excellent sources such as the multi-volume http://books.google.com/books?id=SQMQQyIaACYC&pg=PA202#v=onepage&q=&f=false Greenwood encyclopedia of science fiction and fantasy which amply demonstrate the |notability and |unoriginality of the topic
— User:Colonel, 18:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEL||WP:BLOCK||WP:DISRUPT||WP:N||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)