Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard J. Weibel
Lightburst sums up my feelings. He does seem to meet . His magazine writing seems to indicate he has importance in his field. He has brief mentions in multiple RS and WP:BASIC states ''"If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability"'' He may pass , ''"The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors."'' Under , ''" "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded"''; I think he meets this. The article is certainly notable for being the first one where I vote "Keep" and {{u| AleatoryPonderings}} votes "Delete" ;)  &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
— User:TimothyBlue, 21:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ANYBIO||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)