Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OtterBox
Article is pretty clearly  (very weird to have a patents section, for example), but that doesn't take away from its notability necessarily. There's a decent number of hits on Google News, and it was named by Forbes as one of America's most promising companies http://www.forbes.com/companies/otterbox/ and some product reviews in major publications (e.g., http://www.thestar.com.my/Tech/Hardware/Mobile/2014/01/02/You-Otter-use-this/. I do share your strong distaste for the paid editing going on here
— User:Mikeman67, 23:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)