Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Ancheril
No matter how "significant" any role is or isn't, NACTOR is not passed just by ''stating'' that roles were had, or even by sourcing the having of roles to the shows' own |self-published promotional materials or press releases — it is passed only by showing significant and substantial |reliable source coverage in real media ''about'' her and her performances to ''demonstrate'' that the roles were as significant as you claim they were. If all you had to do to get an actor over NACTOR was to ''say'' the ''word'' "significant", then every actor could just throw the word "significant" into their article and no actor would ever actually be non-notable anymore — so, basically, an actor cannot pass NACTOR #1 if he or she does not simultaneously pass . So the only source here that's relevant to whether she passes NACTOR or not is the ''Globe and Mail'' article (footnote #4) — but that article isn't about her, and instead just briefly namechecks her existence as a person that the actual subject of the article once @'ed in a Twitter tweet. That's not enough
— User:Bearcat, 19:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)