Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vageshwari Deswal
I have continued to remove excess citations from the article, and based on what remains: ''The Times of India'' and ''The Economic Times'' are both major conventional news outlets in India that frequently publish Deswal's legal commentary, and describe her as an expert in https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/author/vageshwari-deswal/ her profile, i.e. "an academician, feminist and activist teaching at Faculty of Law, University of Delhi." The "frequency" is documented by https://muckrack.com/journalists MuckRack, which claims to automatically update online portfolios, so it offers at least an estimate of Deswal's publication rate.  states that it is a guideline, not a rule, and "Criterion 7 may be satisfied, ''for example'', if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area." (emphasis added, because in this instance, Deswal is frequently published in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area, and based on the subject matter and her profile, it appears to be an expert in women's rights issues). In addition, Deswal is quoted as an expert in ''The Quint'', which appears to be a respected news outlet in India, and ''ABC News (Australia)'', which appears to be a public news outlet with editorial independence in Australia. Per , for ''The Times of India'', there is currently "a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable. It tends to have a bias in favor of the Indian government," yet Deswal often appears as an expert calling for changes to the status quo. However, a review of some of Deswal's research suggests that she does work in conjunction with the government sometimes, including with regard to investigating acid violence attacks on women, as well as issues related to farmers and prison reform
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:TOI (Wikipedia:Notability)