Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludmila Foblová
Both "" and "" are invoked above. They're two names for the same thing. If this (not these) were rigorously applied, a very large number of biographies that are clearly ''not'' vanity -- the biographee is long dead, and was obviously not known to the biographer(s) -- would have to be deleted. Unless, that is, the weasel word ''significant'' were interpreted maganimously. Has Foblová's work "won significant critical attention"? Well, it's written up. (Inconveniently for me, in a language I happen not to be able to read.) Are the write-ups "significant"? I suspect that they tend to be if you like her work and they tend not to be if you don't. Her work doesn't interest me but I hope and try to be fair; perhaps somebody whose ability in Czech is sufficient not only to babelfish just what is said but to gauge the significance of its being said where it's said can contribute here
— User:Hoary, 02:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE||WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Notability)