Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.BLP (2nd nomination)
without merge per Izno. The nom's badfaith characterization of the article as trade secret exposure notwithstanding, there is little question that GNG is not met in this case. Rather than couching it in terms of misappropriation, I'd suggest that the article is simply too detailed and that it falls on the wrong side of . (Also: |obligatory
— User:Thibbs, 17:44, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:BLPDEL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)