Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kirk
fails .  Well, yes, there are a lot of publication credits there, but do we have any sense that his collective body of work is deemed significant in the field, as  requires?  With a directed Google search to weed out similarly named professors of economics and art, there are only 624 hits, and even there a lot of them are for other people; I don't get a sense here that he's all that much of a pioneer as all of that.  My mind could change with some genuine attribution
— User:RGTraynor, 17:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATT||WP:PROFTEST (Wikipedia:Attribution)