Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey Renaud (2nd nomination)
and close per no consensus. A presumption of notability, according to the guideline, is derived from sources. I would take that a bit further and state it also implies that a person should really be notable for more than just one accomplishment. This player had a storied collegiate and amateur career, and an unfortunate death, so we can close that portion of the discussion. The first sentence of the guideline is that "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The subject meets these criteria. Anything to circumvent  defeats having it in the first place. Further, per , "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability." There are multiple independent secondary sources so this requirement is also met. These are the only requirements that afford a presumption of notability. Past this, we have only Additional criteria, such as , and "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included
— User:MrPrada, 05:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:ATHLETE (Wikipedia:Notability)