Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey Z
Meets  for being "widely cited by peers" and his works receiving recognition in independent sources. The "claim to notability" is in the lede. Wikipedia articles are not written for a toddler's mentality, and do not begin with insultingly simplistic things such as "This topic is notable because....".  The article AND project will be be improved through regular editing without crying "it has not been done or it cannot be done". Topic notability is met through |verifiabilty of contents and assertions to show it meeting |our inclusion criteria. While nice,  is not the only criteria for determining if something might be within these pages to serve its readers, specially as guideline specifically tells us at , that ''if'' lacking GNG, "a topic is also presumed notable if it meets the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right", which this topic does. {{smiley
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 12:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:V||WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)