Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consultative selling
It is irrelevant whether the information in the article is trivial or whether everyone has always been doing this. And if the article is unreadable (aster egg|Easter egg alert: that is not the same as |patent nonsense), WP:so fix it|so fix it, don't delete it. The only relevant criterion is whether the topic is ''notable'', a requirement that is fulfilled if there exists non-trivial coverage in multiple independent |reliable sources. There are many http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Consultative+selling%22 book hits; I have not attempted to evaluate how reliable they are and how non-trivial the mention is, but some books have this even in the title, and it would thus seem plausible there is enough material out there. &nbsp
— [[User talk:Lambiam|Lambiam]], 23:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:E||WP:patent nonsense||WP:reliable sources (Wikipedia:Editing policy)