Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump Derangement Syndrome
or at least merge to  Donald Trump. MrX failed to mention the wide variety of sources that were on the page including the Washington Post, New Yorker, National Review,  Los Angeles Times, and Chicago Tribune.  More sources have been added including more from Washington Post, CNN, Fox News, Time, Forbes, and local newspapers.  It is obvious that the term is notable, as it has been mentioned by a wide variety of sources in publication and in television, both liberal and conservative.  The aims of  and  are not applicable here.  The article is balanced.  There is a wide range of point of views and sources.  The term is used for reflection and by critics as the article states.  As far as  (if this is considered to be a neologism, which no source calls it), the majority of the articles cite what reliable sources "say about the term or concept."  They are "not just sources that use the term."  Therefore, it does not fail  either.  This is not going to be obsolete.  It has been widespread usage from 2016 to present
— User:JimmyPiersall, 13:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTOPINION||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)