Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael D'Orazio
It is shown in this debate that D'Orazio doesn't meet  because the sources available are all press releases and local in-game coverage, which isn't acceptable coverage. The sources Dolovis keeps bringing up were successfully rebutted yet he/she keeps trying to defend the article "using the same sources", instead of listening to Resolute and others advise to check for any extra sourcing to see if it meets GNG, thus saving the article from deletion. That either means that Dolovis is ignorant and lazy to find the sourcing, or there is none. This debate is ridiculous and I hope the closing administrator would take it to account
— User:Secret, 00:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)