Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special Strong
reliable source"  and "in-depth coverage" is two out of three - people always tend to try to ignore  and the fact that all the information is provided by the company (in a glowingly positive way, hence the term "advertorial"). Same as the CityLifeStyle article https://issuu.com/lifestylepubs/docs/mckinney___prosper_2021_1_print originally published in McKinney & Prosper - once you see it in the original magazine, you'll see it as an advertorial also. The entire magazine is one big bunch of ads. You need to examine very closely those times when the CEO is being interviewed or there are mentions of the company and ask - who is providing the information. To pass ORGIND, it can't originate from the company/CEO/founder/executive and be published - the reference requires independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of those links provide that
— User:HighKing, 10:23, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)