Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epygi
Discussions of editor education and specific edits aside, it looks like | other stuff exists is the primary (or maybe only) reason being advanced to keep this article. That seems to be trying to gloss over the appearance that the company is  |really not so notable: "trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." I'm always willing to support an article if it can be shown there's a reason to keep it, but...I don't see it here. More independent sources (Infoworld reviews of one product aren't enough) would help
— User:Frank, 22:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OSE||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)