Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David I Orenstein
Tomato33 appears to be confusing the notability of ''topics'' (i.e. things that might be the subject of a Wikipedia article) with the notability of ''sources''.  Sources are neither notable nor non-notable.  They may be either |reliable or not, and we really only want the reliable ones, and they may include coverage of the topic that is significant or not (and we really only want the significant coverage).  In this case, the ''Library Journal'' profile of Orenstein is both reliable and significant, and does count toward the weight of coverage for this individual.  However, it appears to be the ''only'' source which meets these criteria.  We might, possibly (although unlikely) end up with an article on Orenstein as a notable librarian, but based on available sources, not as a notable secular humanist
— User:WikiDan61, 14:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)