Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craftsvilla (2nd nomination)
nbsp; The nomination provides no -REASON, so editors must guess as to the purpose for the nomination.&nbsp; In the previous AfD, the nominator cited "notability", which would be 8, although when sources were brought to the AfD the nominator asserted that they were "simply expected coverage", which is not policy-based terminology.&nbsp; No mention was made then of "advertising".&nbsp; Currently, there is no concern for notability.&nbsp; The word "blatant" or forms of the word appear here five times.&nbsp; If the problems are now "blatant", how do we interpret the absence at the last AfD of a concern for blatancy or any concern for "advertising"?&nbsp; The nomination states that the concerns were stated at the previous AfD, but objectively I see no basis for this assertion.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 01:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DEL||WP:DEL8 (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)