Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Stoltz
On a purely procedural point, you could have just proposed this for deletion as a regular .  is an expedited process for BLPs with absolutely no sourcing, but BLPs can still be deleted through the general PROD process. On topic: this clearly lacks the sourcing needed to establish notability, and the lack of sourcing is especially damaging given the article is a BLP. A quick search of the guy's name doesn't turn up any significant coverage
— User:Martin, 17:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP: PROD||WP: BLPPROD (Wikipedia:Proposed deletion)