Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asynchronous semaphore
nothing in Google news, only a few hundred https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Asynchronous+semaphore&rlz=1C1CHBD_en-GBGB755GB755&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjC-KLI5Z_WAhXCDcAKHcG0D0kQ_AUICSgA&biw=1366&bih=638&dpr=1 Google results, which of course doesn't preclude notability, but all of the sources are either |affiliated or unreliable (WordPress, for example).  I agree with the |original research assertion by the nominator because many of its claims aren't even verified in self-published sources.  Little indication of passing |general notability guidelines
— User:DrStrauss, 13:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SPS||WP:OR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)