Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Anglo-German Cultural Relations
the only hits I can find on this source is a few ''mere mention'' of the fact that this or that academic is affiliated with it. It therefore fails "significant coverage". And no, it is third-party coverage that matters, not s. It is easily possible for university programmes to have classes in the thousands, but be so blandly generic and mechanical (i) that nobody would bother commenting on them & (ii) they're indistinguishable from similar programmes in any other large university. There is http://www.rae.ac.uk/results/qualityProfile.aspx?id=137&type=hei no indication that the research in this field is sufficiently prominent to merit a mention in the Queen Mary, University of London article
— User:Hrafn, 07:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIGNUMBER (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)