Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dandelion Radio
In response to the statement that, "The poster of the deletion proposal made no attempt to define exactly why he felt that Dandelion Radio was "non-notable"," look at the end of the deletion proposal - you will see "Fails  / ."  Those two links take you to two of Wikipedia's "Notability guidelines", which define what is and is not notable for Wikipedia purposes.  If you want to make a case to have this article kept, I suggest you follow those links and read those pages.  However, when you linked to the  Portsmouth newspaper article you did yourself a favor.  The big thing about notability is that on Wikipedia it boils down to |are the claims made in the article verifiable from multiple, independant, reliable sources?.  Notability is a guideline - but it is based on verifiability, which is a basic site policy.  That newspaper article is one independant, reliable source.  Dig up several more, make sure that each and every claim in the article can be traced back to one, and you'll have yourself a good article by Wikipedia standards, and it'll be kept
— User:ONUnicorn, 20:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:NOTE||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)