Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megalithic geometry
The , , and "gaming wikipedia for notability in real life" issues surrounding these articles are clouding my judgment, but I think that a merger of some of the content to Alan Butler would be acceptable, provided it is done carefully. However, I would object to merging with Megalithic yard or any of the other "established" fringe theories as they might bestow some their notability onto this more dubious fringe notion, violating . I suppose such a merger could be done right, but the undue thing won't even be an issue if merged and presented as a part of the an Alan Butler article
— User:Cronholm144, 09:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:SOCK||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)