Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleargear
The Company did receive a lot of coverage and a PR nightmare but solely for the fine imposed on the customer  .It is for this reason https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Materialscientist#Kleargear that a admin did not Speedy the article and suggested AFD. Almost entire article is about the fine and the non-disparagement clause  and most of the the sources are from Consumer activist sites  and speak only about the fine and are from Nov 2013.There is little coverage beyond this and the company fails   and there is nothing to state the Company is notable beyond this |Fine issue and it fails . Large sections of the article lack  sources and some of them with consumer activism sites negative material needs to WP:LIBEL| be referenced through the citation of reliable published sources, so as to maintain a standard of verifiability It is Wikipedia policy to delete libelous material when it has been identified
— User:Pharaoh, 20:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:ORG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)