Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miscarriage of justice cases
Notable, verifiable, objective criterion, not indiscriminate. I don't know how Shadowjams can seriously contest that there are ''no possible NPOV criteria for entry''. If someone would like to use the article's talk page to explain where the POV enters in terms of alleged cherry-picking of cases and POV pushing in the descriptions, |this can be fixed - it's not an argument for deletion
— User:AlexTiefling, 12:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SOFIXIT (Wikipedia:Be bold)