Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagg Romney (2nd nomination)
This should have never been recreated without going to DRV first.  Nothing has changed at all since I nominated this for deletion (successfully) almost 2 years ago; then, as now, the source coverage stems from the connections to his father.  The person's bio needs to be looked at in the context of ; any other person in the world who had been VP of online marketing for a shoe company, a presidential campaign aide, etc...would not get within spitting distance of being covered in the media.  The coverage here comes ''solely'' by who he is related to.  The keep votes must be weighted as next-to-nothing, as they do not address the "notability is not inherited" issue, nor do they demonstrate what has changed in the 2 years since AfD #1.  What has Tagg Romney done independently of his father to earn coverage in reliable sources?  Nothing in 2011, which is why it was deleted, and nothing new since then. RayAYang's "vote" is particularly odious and at complete odds with Wikipedia guidelines.  The "why" of a source is of great importance to deciding ; sources that only cover a subject in the context of one event do not make a 1Event person into a worthwhile article subject.  So all in all, if there was ever a time for a closing admin to demonstrate that an AfD is not a straight-up vote, but rather a measure of arguments that are correctly backed by policy or guideline, this is it
— User:Tarc, 13:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)