Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaveh Farrokh
basically per nom as failing  and . For  there is no evidence of high citability of his work by other academics, very few academic reviews of his work, no academic awards or honors and his two books are not widely held by academic libraries. He is quoted a few times by newsmedia as a historian but certainly not enough to pass criterion 7 of ; as item no 14 in the "Notes and Examples" section of  says, "Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark." GoogleNews gives a total of 6 hitshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22Kaveh+Farrokh%22, certainly not enough. With , I do not see any examples of in-depth biographical coverage of him by independent reliable sources. All in all, delete
— User:Nsk92, 23:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)