Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elonka Dunin (2nd nomination)
obviously. She is quoted in The Guardian and in Science magazine and in The Washington Post + she's mentioned in the Wall Street Journal and on CNN.com + she has 25000+ Google-hits + she's quoted as a reference in a couple of WP articles + she seems to be fairly known among cryptographers + she is a published author. By the way I don't see how writing a comprehensive explanation (that includes several external references) on a ''discussion'' page could be qualified as "very tasteless spamming". And as for "whether Elonka is contacting other encyclopedias and reference works to ensure that she is included in future editions", see 
— User:Zoz, 22:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)