Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert Dover (2nd nomination)
Although the ''Apple Daily'' coverage on it's own would likely not be enough to be notable, the substantial coverage by other secondary sources seem to warrant the retention of this article, as notability seems reasonable. Notability is not necessarily based on "achievements", and even if ''Apple Daily''&apos;s investigation is not found to be just, I think the secondary coverage of ''Apple Daily''&apos;s report and subsequent reactions are notable enough. Per , IMO there is little question of the notability as the subject has "received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject
— User:17jiangz1, 14:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)