Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game of Thrones title sequence (2nd nomination)
The nominator suggests it is not notable, and that it qualifies as . While I agree that winning an Emmy does not alone make this topic notable, the many many secondary sources in the article and referenced above certainly ensures the topic clears the notability bar. Whether or not it is fancruft is immaterial. The fancruft essay (not a policy document) explains many common problems with articles that are written by 'fans' of a topic.  Even if I were to grant the fact that in this article there are too many tables and too much detail (which I am not convinced of), then that is problem best addressed by edits and on the talk page, not by deletion
— User:Benthatsme, 23:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FANCRUFT (Wikipedia:Fancruft)