Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Yeagley
This article obviously needs a good makeover to ensure |neutrality, as most of the editing appears to be from people with strong opinions about Yeagley rather than from people taking an objective view of what has been published in independent reliable sources, but there has clearly been significant coverage in such sources, meaning that he is notable: http://books.google.com/books?id=xVeIsvQjFN4C&pg=PA258&dq=%22David+A.+Yeagley%22+OR+%22David+Yeagley%22&hl=en&ei=gUJPTN3JEcq9sAbEqOWgAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22David%20A.%20Yeagley%22%20OR%20%22David%20Yeagley%22&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=MVr5VGc2JgsC&pg=PA201&dq=%22David+A.+Yeagley%22+OR+%22David+Yeagley%22&hl=en&ei=gUJPTN3JEcq9sAbEqOWgAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22David%20A.%20Yeagley%22%20OR%20%22David%20Yeagley%22&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=H_RrLyV9rDUC&pg=PA445&dq=%22David+A.+Yeagley%22+OR+%22David+Yeagley%22&hl=en&ei=gUJPTN3JEcq9sAbEqOWgAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=26&ved=0CJoBEOgBMBk#v=onepage&q=%22David%20A.%20Yeagley%22%20OR%20%22David%20Yeagley%22&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=LFHzAAAAMAAJ&q=%22David+A.+Yeagley%22+OR+%22David+Yeagley%22&dq=%22David+A.+Yeagley%22+OR+%22David+Yeagley%22&hl=en&ei=gUJPTN3JEcq9sAbEqOWgAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=39&ved=0CNABEOgBMCYhttp://books.google.com/books?id=I3KBAAAAMAAJ&q=%22David+A.+Yeagley%22+OR+%22David+Yeagley%22&dq=%22David+A.+Yeagley%22+OR+%22David+Yeagley%22&hl=en&ei=gUJPTN3JEcq9sAbEqOWgAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=44&ved=0COQBEOgBMCshttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a741506926http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/wicazo_sa_review/v023/23.1russell.htmlhttp://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/american_indian_quarterly/v031/31.2byrd.htmlhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a904092219http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a758728739http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a755199600http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C01E0DF1E3CF933A05750C0A9639C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/06/23/18510505.php. The nominator and others have brought up lots of other issues apart from notability, but they are reasons to edit the article rather than to delete it, and, most certainly, distaste for Yeagley's opinions is not a reason for deletion, otherwise we might as well delete Adolf Hitler (please don't quote Godwin's law at me)  and Osama bin Laden
— User:Phil, 21:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:neutrality (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)