Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination)
refactor to ''Palmer v. Kleargear.com'' or a similar title.  Unless Wikipedia has started recognizing Corporate personhood (and if that's the case, I missed the memo.)  is inapplicable. I think there's an excellent chance that Kleargear is only notable for the case, though, and given the case really the subject of the coverage, a rename is warranted.  is interesting here, but the most relevant guidance is really at .  There, we do have some international coverage, so  is modestly satisfied,  as well, there is modest , and given a possible appeal, it's difficult to estimate the chances of any possible  effect, some sort of precedent is plausible here given the novelty of the case, but far from assured. In short,  we're left with a judgement call, and in view of those metrics, I lean toward retaining content per , and titling it properly to correct issues of  weight. If this is moved, I believe a redirect would be appropriate per usual practice. If there is a valid user for userfication, that would be my second choice in order to preserve content should an appeal to the Circuit Court happen
— User:Joe, 05:14, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:DEPTH||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:LASTING||WP:PRESERVE||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)