Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FRSs with public religious stances
The notion ''that this information is important'' to be presented ''in this manner'' is original synthesis, violation of . The list appears to be a violation of  as well, as the author points out the purpose of the list is "dispelling popular misconceptions".http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_FRSs_with_public_religious_stances&diff=117008584&oldid=116993859 NBeale, http://starcourse.blogspot.com/2007/03/amazing-few-days.html you have a blog. Please use it. That's the appropriate outlet for your POV
— User:Coelacan, 14:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYN||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:No original research)