Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eta Uso Jr.
Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be the ''subject'' of enough |reliable source media coverage to clear , but "subject of enough reliable source media coverage to clear GNG" is not what the sources here are demonstrating. There are nine footnotes here, but one of them is a reduplication of one of the others, so there are really only eight sources — but one just leads to an "access denied" lockout, leaving me unable to verify anything about it at all; two are directly affiliated |primary sources published by his own alma mater, not independent coverage that would help to establish notability; two are glancing namechecks of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article about something else, not coverage which has him as its ''subject''; and three are bylined pieces of his own writing about other subjects, not coverage which has him as its subject. As always, the notability test is not just the ability to verify that he exists — he is not a notable journalist just because his own journalism metaverifies its own existence — but none of these sources establish that he's notable at all. There's also a likely |conflict of interest of some sort, if the creator's ''only'' contributions to Wikipedia have been multiple attempts to make this article happen — there's no hard evidence as to whether the creator is Eta Uso himself or a friend or colleague or family member of his, but those would all still be conflicts of interest anyway
— User:Bearcat, 15:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)