Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Marchick
I oppose relisting. The thread has already run for 12 days, which practically means it has been relisted once. There is sufficient discussion, and sufficient information unearthed, to decide for good. Deletion is not necessarily based on consensus, it is based on policy and guidelines. One doesn't relist just because there was a lengthy discussion; an Afd tag has real consequences: it scares editors off the page (why put in what could vanish tomorrow), and it leaves readers with a vague idea there is something not fine with the subject. There isn't anything stuck here, since we don't need a consensus to decide an Afd. Here are the sources collected in one place: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B86iegI5pG5TTUN4RHlKVS1MeG8 Journal of Economic Literature, Vol XLV, 2007, pp. 1042–44, an in-depth review of his book, http://www.cfr.org/business-and-foreign-policy/foreign-investment-national-security/p11146 here, http://cip.gmu.edu/archive/archive/2009_CFIUS_CIP_Update.pdf Journal of Homeland Security, citation to book,  http://books.google.com/books?id=HjO1mkyoMagC&pg=PA101 (Palgrave MacMillan), http://books.google.com/books?id=0kmvyB8PuFUC&pg=PA267 (W.W. Norton), http://books.google.com/books?id=vqjWWs9FDFwC (Kluwer Law: pages 51, 168, 169), http://books.google.com/books?id=-B_7n0jOJggC&pg=PA83 (Edward Elgar: page 57 in biblio and a bunch of other pages, check with a search), http://books.google.com/books?id=4tHEFuaKaCAC (Peterson Institute for International Economics, pages 192, 200, 202), http://books.google.com/books?id=mhcWghgCx2kC (Edward Elgar), http://books.google.com/books?id=z3fGsUG97AoC&pg=PT254 (Yale University Press), http://books.google.com/books?id=k-GPxGMy8qMC&pg=PA146 (Cengage learning—a textbook in its 13th edition, clearly instructors are using it to teach),  http://cip.gmu.edu/archive/archive/2009_CFIUS_CIP_Update.pdf Washington Post and Financial times (pay link), http://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/17/style/weddings-pamela-kurland-david-marchick.html New York Times Style section, book as the course material for a law course at http://www.law.georgetown.edu/academics/academic-programs/graduate-programs/current-students/upload/National-Security-Law-and-the-Private-Sector-Fagan-and-Plotkin.docx Georgetown University. That coverage, largely non-trivial (a footnote is not trivial since it is a citation and one should look at the cited material to see the coverage), meets , which asks for reliable, third-party, non-trivial coverage, and nothing else. Relisting is when sufficient discussion has not occurred, not when there is lack of consensus
— User:Churn, 14:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)