Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Tollerman (2nd nomination)
In the world of wine, and certain in the world of wine consulting and sommeliers, Tollerman has done nothing of significance to establish notability. As a wine editor, I would say there are a lot of Master Sommeliers that have more claim to notability per  and  than Mr. Tollerman and there are a lot of Master Somms that also '''don't''' have sufficient claim for notability. Just being a wine consultant to a big name winery or head somm at a hotel is not notable. There seems to be some vanity vendetta on the part of Tollerman or his associates to have an article on Wikipedia as evidence by it repeated recreation without any change in his notability or status. Quite weird. If he wants to get on Wikipedia so badly maybe he should write a book or rob a bank (granted, the bank robbery alone probably wouldn't pass  but at least it would help his case
— User:Agne27, 03:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)