Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killings at Coolacrease
Potatoswatter, please take another look at the article. The list looks impressive, because it includes lots of references to trivial points (in sources which are highly unlikely to menton these killings at all). When it comes to the core of the story, the only source which comes anywhere close to being a reliable secondary sources is the articles in the local paper by Philip McConway, who is a postgraduate studenthttp://www.tcd.ie/history/postgradcon.php. An article by a postgrad in a low-circulation local newspaper is not the sort of peer-reviewed publication that fits the best standard of reliable source, per .Beyond that, we have lots of primary sources (irrelevant to notability), and two books by involved parties; that hardly amounts to notability per .As to your suggestion that I should be "explaining the poor historical foundations to the readers" ... are you serious? You appear to be asking me to write a  of original commentary, in flagrant breach of 
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 00:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOTE||WP:ESSAY||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)