Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retro VGS
The time spent on this AfD would be better spent cleaning up the article. Yes, it should be sourced to secondary sources wherever possible instead of the press release, however there are a number of sources for the purposes of the |general notability guideline, including the TechCrunch refs currently in the article and the first few hits of the /RS|video game vetted sources https://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=003516479746865699832:leawcwkqifq custom Google search. "Advertising" is not a good deletion rationale—otherwise it would qualify for speedy deletion. –&nbsp
— [[user talk:czar|czar]], 03:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:VG (Wikipedia:Notability)