Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard Opportunes (2nd nomination)
I disagree; I believe that despite the best attempts, the writers are doubtlessly partial towards their own choral groups, sports teams, and organizations, and I am sure that some of these biases make it past the editorial board.  However, this is beside the point.  None of the ''Crimson'''s articles really speak to any of this article's non-established claims (hence, claims in violation of .  As Pan Dan said just above your comment, we need to source all the claims in this article, at a bare minimum... and I'm still not at all convinced that it covers a notable subject
— User:Srose, 02:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)