Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess C Scott (2nd nomination)
There is nothing in the article that show that the subject meets  in any way. The supposed "third-party coverage" is all either mere mentions of the subject, simple quotes by the subject, or dead links. Oddly, I don't find a single review of her works published in a reliable source. I also don't find where any of her works have been listed on any sales charts, of have even been published by a regular publishing house. As a whole, the article appears to be more promotional than encyclopedic. Regarding the thinly-veiled accusations of some sort of conspiracy, I suggest that editor to visit |Other Stuff Exists. --&#124
— User:Uncle, 21:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:OTHER (Wikipedia:Notability)