Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Pitylak
I had no difficulty finding multiple  sources on this guy on the first two pages of hits from a Google search. His background may be unsavory, but it clearly meets  and . And I am just not seeing this as a promotional article. Reference to his current doings would seem reasonable in a BLP. And that reference is pretty matter of fact to my reading. I have occasionally been accused of being too quick to pull the trigger on suspected SPAM articles. But this just doesn't look like a promo article to me. It's short and to the point, just the facts thank you very much. And as already mentioned the subject is clearly notable
— User:Ad, 01:35, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)