Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubuntu Christian Edition (2nd nomination)
or '''Merge''' Most of these arguments are invalid, delete and keep alike. As has already been pointed out,  doesn't cut the mustard, but neither does "This product shouldn't exist"/aka - I don't like it. What matters is that the page is flagged with multiple borderline WP:RS sources and one patently obvious WP:RS, the print Catholic magazine. As stated above, we don't have a clear/good way to verify that source over teh intertubes, but that's true of most books and many magazines and does not invalidate the source. The relatively weaker sources, given their number, and the RS source are adequate. There is so much overlap between this and other similar projects that I believe it poor writing to deal with them separately, but this second AfD was probably not called for and the nom's rationale is partially inappropriate
— User:MrZaius, 08:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)