Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare Objects
I object to the herrypick of quotes in the section on "Reception". The presumably glowing quote from Publisher's Weekly follows a sentence that says: "An intriguing correspondence between May and the shop’s mysterious absentee co-owner brings further entertainment and character insight, though it doesn’t fit seamlessly into the rest of the plot." So the sentence quoted cannot be said to represent the review. Calling any review "favorable" is, IMO, drawing a conclusion that is not factual. We should avoid inserting these kinds of conclusions into articles. I also note that reviews from these publications that specialize in reviews are short (~250-300 words), mostly descriptive of the plot, and rarely do any analysis. They exist for people to decide whether to buy the book, and are not part of literary criticism by any stretch
— User:LaMona, 21:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:C (Wikipedia:Copyrights)