Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa May (actress)
content and '''retarget''' title to "event" article (needs to be written).  First, to  – there is no doubt that Teresa May has received '''significant coverage''' in '''reliable sources''' that are '''independent of the subject''', so she is '''presumed''' to be suitable for a stand-alone article – "presumed" means "that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject should be included", which is why deleting her article is being discussed here "in depth".  So we see that this begins to boil down to "what Teresa May is".  As for what she is, she has received no awards neither for acting nor modeling, so as I see it, the subject fails both  and .  Therefore, the only possible notability she has must come from the single "event".  We go on to  – one main focus in this discussion has been the third criterion in that part of this Wikipedia '''policy'''.  After removing other stuff, the sentence becomes, "We should generally avoid having an article on a person ... if the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented."  The event has proven itself in reliable sources to be considered significant enough for us to be having this sometimes heated discussion about it.  As well, the subject's role in the event has been quite "well documented".  So the final argument boils down to whether or not the subject's role in "the event" is to be considered "substantial".  Many say "no", because her only role in the event appears to be that her name, "Teresa May", is just one letter off from the prime minister's name of "Theresa May", and that by itself is not at all significant.  Others here seem to say, "But is that her only role in this?  Or is there more to it?"  If her only role is having a very similar name, then no, her role should not be considered as "substantial".  However, if there is more to her role than just the similar name, then that just might make her role in the event substantial, which would meet the BLP1E criteria and allow an article to exist about Teresa May.  Fortunately, the (in this case) controversial BLP1E '''policy''' is assisted by , our '''notability guideline''', which states, "Editors are advised to be cognizant of issues of |weight and to avoid the creation of unnecessary |pseudo-biographies, especially of |living people."  It is with this guideline that the subject's article fails, which means that its content should be deleted.  The guideline also stresses that if the event is significant, as in this case, then an article should be written about the event, and the person's article should be redirected to the event article.  This it would seem is the optimum solution.  Thank you for your indulgence, and I ask your forgiveness for "thinking out loud" and for being unusually verbose.  I actually wrote all this before coming to a final decision. &nbsp
— User:Paine, 15:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NMODEL||WP:PORNBIO||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:WEIGHT||WP:PSEUDO||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)