Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Lomax
Nearly all of the sources in the article appear to be about the discoveries, not about the scientist himself. Of the sources that are about him directly, https://blog.everythingdinosaur.co.uk/blog/_archives/2017/05/12/popular-palaeontologist-to-present-at-prestigious-science-festival.html the everythingdinosaur.co.uk article appears to be a blog (though happy to be convinced otherwise, I'm no dino expert), the http://www.rosiewinterton.co.uk/news/westminster/news.aspx?p=1021638 Rosie Winterton ref appears to be a press release from the local MP's office, and doesn't address the topic in any substantial way, and https://www.doncasterfreepress.co.uk/news/doncaster-to-celebrate-the-work-of-scientist-dean-lomax-with-exhibition-and-fun-day-1-8733460 the Doncaster free press article also appears to be a short local news article about an upcoming talk by the subject. Clearly the subject is the topic of some buzz, especially in the local press. However, I don't think the bar of "significant coverage" (i.e. addressing the topic "|directly and in detail") has been met. This is often a hurdle for academics, who are rarely the topic of secondary sources. For this reason, we have  which provides other ways to tell if an academic is notable. This bar also doesn't appear to be met (according to SCOPUS, top work is cited 11 times). Perhaps someday this scientist will meet the notability criteria here, but I think now it's just |too soon
— User:Ajpolino, 18:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Notability)