Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caversham Primary School (2nd nomination)
Well above average merit" does not equal "Notability." There is no such inherent notability provided by , the relevant guideline for schools that are given some "Ofsted" rating. The Ofsted article seems to say in "Current system of inspection" that 9% of schools get an "Outstanding" rating since 2009, but that 19% got an "Outstanding" rating before 2009.  This is not a compelling argument for notability, at all. In the US, "Blue ribbon" schools include 5200 recipients, or 3.9% of the 133,000 eligible schools. That also is far, far too low a bar. The US award has been criticized as going typically to schools which have students with wealthy parents. In any event it is not selective enough in either country. It is not the "Top performing one school."  requires multiple instances of significant coverage in independent and reliable sources, besides the common outcome of merging elementary and secondary schools. Wikipedia is not a Michelin guide to above average schools. It is specifically |not a directory of every organization which got some particular score in its national rating system.  Being exceptionally good or exceptionally bad at what an organization is there to do does not gain automatic notability. If it did, the 10% lowest rated schools would also be entitled to automatic notability
— User:Edison, 15:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)