Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planets in science fiction
This is an amazingly outrageous AfD -- a classic example of abuse of the AfD process.  The nominator has never been involved in this article; has nothing on the talk page; has not even made any statement that anything is wrong with this article; and has simply thrown up a deletion notice.  Every general claim made is unsubstantiated, for the simple reason that it's false: this is not trivial; it is not loosely associated; nor is there "original research". Nominator hasn't provided a single substantive criticism in the proposal, which doesn't even meet the laugh test.  Is it too much to suggest that nominator is making these deletion proposals in order to make a |point -- namely, that he hates fiction-related articles? Is the repeated failure of his deletion proposals not sinking in?  Nominator is wasting everybody's time with crap like this.  What is the proper response to this kind of tying up of Wikipedia administrative processes with ridiculous proposals
— User:RandomCritic, 00:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)