Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamnet Shakespeare
procedural nom with no delete votes, per  #1)—Shakespeare's only son, whose untimely death cannot but have been an influence on the father (particularly a father that was very concerned with keeping his inheritance undivided for the future), must meet the standard for inclusion. Just look at the references; the article, short as it may be, still cites 8 different |reliable sources, of which 4 are from academic journals or university presses (usually heralded as the gold standard for reliable sources on Wikipedia), and 2 of whom are from the most prominent and respected Shakespeare scholars of the twentieth century (Edmund Kerchever Chambers|Chambers and Samuel Schoenbaum|Schoenbaum). And since I've contributed to this article I can add that the choice of sources was selective; if needed to establish |notability I could add a whole bunch more. As a reminder,  says: '''If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article.'''  In other words, it meets the standard for inclusion and the nom is purely procedural, so my !vote is an emphatic '''speedy keep
— User:Xover, 16:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SK||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)