Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wanderful Media (2nd nomination)
and '''|salt''' - to start with, I'll try to address some of the concerns raised above. 1. this is not |speedy deletion, it's |Articles for Deletion so you should probably read up on that before commenting further. Similarity toi previous version is irrelevant. 2. We need reliable independent coverage. For what might be considered "reliable", please see . |Routine business announcements are rarely considered significant coverage. 3. That's great but it doesn't really impact on anything here. If the tone of the article is |promotional, that's a bigger problem. 4. Good, but it doesn't resolve the |notability issues. 5. The content and style might adhere to  but the subject itself still needs to be |notable to be included. That's the issue here. 6? Nobody has been blocked (from what I can tell) but the article has been deleted in the past and you really need to demonstrate why |consensus might have changed. Really, you should have gone to  before ignoring the community and recreating your article
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 02:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SALT||WP:SPEEDY||WP:AFD||WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:PROMO||WP:N||WP:MOS||WP:N||WP:CCC||WP:DRV (Wikipedia:Protection policy)