Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloudology
I'm glad someone's got a copy of Patrick Reed's book, because Amazon hasn't. In fact, the only ghits (two) are to do with this article. People have been photographing clouds and studying then since cameras were capable capturing images of clouds. Nothing new there. Blogs are not reliable independent sources. Whether or not someone has made up the term 'cloudology', there is no sign of notability. Someone on the talk page says that it is "small and relatively unheard of". That is, it's not notable - by our standards. Our field, our ball, our rules. Yes, we WOULD tell a student of Watson to avoid writing the article because of conflict of interest , and they couldn't use any private knowledge not yet published because of our policy on original research . Hell, we'd even tell WATSON not to write the article himself ( and  and 
— User:Peridon, 20:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:OR||WP:OR||WP:AUTOBIO||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)