Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Eclipse
There's not enough third party coverage to meet the . There's a couple usable sources in all of this, but they're just short articles that are brief product announcements, not significant coverage. A vast majority of the sources cited just don't meet  - they're obscure blogs and -violating material. It's a clear case of  with the sources and  with all these bogus !votes. (I've seen "overzealous deletion" cited more in this discussion in the last 48 hours than in my entire 7 years on Wikipedia - that's about as clear cut as it gets when it comes to misguided collaboration off-wiki
— User:Sergecross73, 12:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:USERG||WP:BOMBARD||WP:SPA (Wikipedia:Notability)