Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleveland steamer (8th nomination)
WP:N seems to be an irrational argument. The article cites sources that discuss the topic. The sources are from a third party. One is even an FCC notice of liability discussing the topic. If you want, I am sure there is a porn site or two that can be used as sources but that seems to be a bit unreasonable, what is used seems fine to me. As for , the article is already expanded beyond a simple definition. Like it or not, this is a pop-culture issue. Also, the argument using  was equally bad. The article does not contain a trivia list. From what I see, this seems to be a deletion based more or less on the limited use of the term. This is an invalid rational. However, given the history of numerous nominations. It will only be a little while before this is nominated again. Ce'st la vie
— User:CraigMonroe, 23:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WINAD||WP:trivia (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)