Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craic
as usual with Wolfkeeper's crusade to rid Wikipedia of articles about words. This is not a dicdef (despite his persistent attempts to be the sole arbiter of what  says and means), it's an encyclopedic article whose topic is a word. And yes, '''words are also valid topics for encyclopedia articles, just like everything else that exists'''. It's well sourced, it's notable, it's interesting and informative, it's everything an encyclopedia article needs to be. Transwikiing to Wiktionary is unacceptable because - guess what! - it's ''not'' a dictionary definition! Wiktionary already has a dicdef on wikt:craic|craic, and doesn't need or want an encyclopedia article taking up that space. Oh, and calling something a "neologism" doesn't make it one: the term "craic" has been around for centuries - nor is it true that we don't have articles on neologisms. We certainly do if they're notable and verifiable
— User:Angr, 16:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)