Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Svidersky (5th nomination)
Wikipedia:NOTMEMORIAL and neither is this article. A memorial is for subjective and emotional tributes.  The article is written according to wikipedia policies of ,  and .  It has been extensively discussed in great detail by a number of experienced editors to arrive at the current text, specifically to avoid inappropriate material. The only justification for the accusation of NOTMEMORIAL is the fact that she is dead, a rationale which would necessitate the deletion of a vast number of articles. I note that "almost everything" is covered in Mourning Sickness, so obviously everything is not covered. For everything to be covered adequately it would be necessary to transfer the text of the article into the mourning sickness article, which would be inappropriate and the reason we have a  methodology, so that people who wish to find out more can go to where the more detailed examination of the subject exists. The fact that she is considered to be important enough to merit her own section in the mourning sickness article is a reason to keep the article on her, not to delete it. The inclusion of some material from one article in a second is not a reason for deleting the first article. Sviderdsky has in a most unfortunate way achieved individual notability, rather more in fact than Mourning sickness. The fact that the latter received 473 views in August,http://stats.grok.se/en/200908/Mourning%20sickness and Anna Svidersky received 3454,http://stats.grok.se/en/200908/Anna%20Svidersky speaks for that. As the article has been nominated four times before, the first "no consensus" and the last three all  "keeps", I consider this nom to be inappropriate. , but there is no change of external circumstances to justify the expectation that it will in this case
— User:Tyrenius, 02:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:SUMMARY||WP:CCC (Wikipedia:Verifiability)