Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipediocracy (2nd nomination)
I suspect I may be one of the editors Silver seren speaks of when they talk of re-evaluating the sources, as I have been arguing against this article's appearance as a DYK due to questionable notability.  In short, I agree completely with the analysis of the references, and despite searching, have found no indication of the existence of a single source that is independent of Wikipediocracy and offers significant coverage of the site. The time may well come when such coverage does exist, and that will be the time to consider creating this article (and potential DYK).  However, due to the present lack of coverage, this article is actually a , where the real purpose is to promote criticism of Wikipedia itself.  Criticism of Wikipedia|That article already exists, and lacking the above required non-trivial coverage of Wikipediocracy, there is no need for a duplicate
— User:Resolute, 04:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)