Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizzeria Venti (2nd nomination)
Bogus reasoning Keep !votes above ''I think notability is established through references from multiple reliable sources and from the fact that this chain emphasizes quality (with correspondingly higher prices) compared to other pizza chains.'' First, there must be multiple (ie at least two) sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability. So if one reference is in-depth (meets ) but is based on an interview with an owner (failed ) and another reference is the opposite, is written by a journalist and contains Independent Content (meets ) but only describes the pizza that is served in the restaurant (fails ), you don't combine both and say they count towards notability. Also, whether they emphasize quality has nothing to do with notability. An examination of the references in the article (and book) and the references mentioned in the previous AfD shows that not a single one meets the criteria for establishing notability. Most are based on announcements or interviews (fails ORGIND) or inclusions in a list or mentions-in-passing (fails CORPDEPTH). I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability - topic fails GNG and 
— User:HighKing, 19:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)