Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Rewald
I'm still not convinced that he is notable - is this now a  article?  Should the real article be about the crime or the company rather than about the person?  I see you have had a merge request in the Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham and Wong|Company->Person direction - I'm thinking it should be merged Person -> Company - only leaving the merge request open for only http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bishop,_Baldwin,_Rewald,_Dillingham_and_Wong&action=history 7.5 hours isn't very useful, either.  I'll leave this AfD open and redirect the Delsort tags to bring in people more used to editing criminal related articles to decide.  Reading some of the public comments on one of the supplied sources makes this article a bit of a vandalism target - there seems to be a few people still angry/involved in the case out there.  Amazed that the criminal part never made it in the article until now.  And Pburka - I'm not doubting your efforts, motives or the reliability of the references you've found - it is just that this is way outside of my normal editing sphere (which is sports or Australian topics), so I'll prefer for others to decide
— User:The, 06:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)