Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meep
specific criticism is exactly what I provided in the nom. The article is not remotely encylopedic and is, at best, a collection of indiscriminately googled up mentions of the word "Meep". You might try moving it to wiktionary and see how they react. Your one "academic" PDF comes from a personal website and is merely routed via google scholar, the rest are blogs/forums/websites that have been formatted according to wikipedia guidelines and a "Fantasy creature" section that is  material. As for the schools point below: that is not an argument not to delete this article. You need to argue about those articles elsewhere
— User:Motor, 20:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BJAODN (Wikipedia:Silly Things)