Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Handbra (2nd nomination)
unless reliable sources discussing the topic are found before the end of AfD.  No, those two don't qualify—they're passing mentions in op-ed pieces.   is not a valid argument.  Google hits are not a very good argument, and what I'm seeing on Google is A) products named "hand bra" (which is not what this article is talking about), and...blogs.  There may be more in there somewhere, but I didn't find it.  I will happily reconsider if more and better sources turn up—I have no personal convictions one way or the other about this one—but right now, I'm just not seeing it
— User:Xtifr, 15:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)