Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natami
and merge any |verifiable content to the Amiga#Amiga hardware clones|Amiga article's hardware clones section. Total lack of |reliable sources, and while I, as a geek, have considerable sympathy for the outpouring of -style arguments above, they are not in any way good arguments for inclusion. The "Obligement" source is the closest thing we have to a passable source but I can't find any evidence on the site that it would pass muster as a reliable source, per the |relevant guidelines. Micro Mart might suffice as a reliable source if anyone could produce the alleged coverage and if it is significant, independent, etc. I note that a search for "Natami" on Micro Mart's website produces zero results, although I do know that that does not necessarily mean that they have never featured this product in print
— User:Ginsengbomb, 23:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RELIABLE||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:RELIABLE (Wikipedia:Verifiability)