Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Spielmann
While I do think that the article should be '''kept''', I think there is a certain amount of abuse of citation numbers going on in this discussion (and in the article as well), and the case for trouting does not seem so strong to me.  In experimental physics, it is not unusual for hundreds of individuals to coauthor the same paper.  In the first pages of results on Google scholar, he is not the primary author.  Even so, he clearly does hold a respectable h-index even as a primary author, so I would grant him a pass under criterion 1 of .  (However, I would remove the statement from the article about his Google scholar citation number as grossly misleading .  Search index results are not usually thought of as reliable sources for this very reason.)  I agree that the awards are not significant enough to qualify as fulfilling criterion 2
— User:Sławomir, 13:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Notability)