Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ego the Living Planet
while most people agree that the character is important because of its longevity and so on, this (like some other similar recent AFD's) has the big problem that that is not sufficient. If the character is not discussed in independent (i.e. not by Marvel), reliable sources, then it fails  and it fails our basic aim to be a tertiary source, not a secondary source. What we need are in depth sources. The character gets mentioned in one articlehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Ego+the+Living+Planet%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search (snippet view http://books.google.com/books?id=UUkVe8vmeYwC&q=%22Ego+the+Living+Planet%22&dq=%22Ego+the+Living+Planet%22&lr=&ei=H77PR__FNJbWzATBh7WdAg&pgis=1). It gets mentioned in a few books, but nothing beyond a passing mention. All in all, this looks to be one of those things that has been around for years but hasn't gotten any serious attention outside fan circles. Should we have an article on it? No, not really. There are over 1,200 articles in the :Category:Marvel Comics supervillains alone, I don't believe all of them are notable, and there is no evidence from reliable sources that this one is
— User:Fram, 09:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)