Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Year 10,000 problem (3rd nomination)
It is not our role as WP editors to speculate on how likely this event is to take place.  It has received coverage from multiple, non-trivial, reliable sources, and therefore meets .  I don't see why the "External links" were discarded as "not serious" and no reason was given.  If one search did not return sufficient results, try others like http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2B%22Year+10%2C000+problem%22+-wikipedia "Year 10,000 problem", http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2B%22Year+10%2C000+bug%22+-wikipedia "Year 10,000 bug", http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2B%22Y10K+problem%22+-wikipedia "Y10K problem", and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2B%22Y10K+bug%22+-wikipedia "Y10K bug".  That gives between 1920 and 4306 ghits (the latter figure being the sum of all four, although there are bound to be duplicates
— User:Black, 22:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)