Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coeloria elegans
I see three questions here.  First, is every biological species that has been properly documented and accepted by the appropriate taxonomic authority for its kingdom notable ''ipso facto''?  I think that the answer to that is yes.  If we don't have a notability guideline to that effect, we should.  Second, is a taxon inquirendum notable ''ipso facto''?  That seems to be the issue here, and I think that it makes more sense to include any taxon inquirendum than to exclude it.  Third, should this article be deleted because of the misconduct of its creating editor?  If it should, then it should nonetheless be re-created by an editor in good standing, and I am willing to do this, so that deleting it is simply a symbolic gesture.  For that reason, |ignore all rules should apply to avoid the need for a pointless deletion and re-creation.  The only real issue is whether we should include a taxon inquirendum.  To that question, I ask:  Why not
— User:Robert, 23:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)