Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnosticism in popular culture (2nd nomination)
Nominator notes that no one has cleaned it up... but has not himself cleaned it up!  Just because no one has cleaned up an article suitable for cleanup does not mean that deletion is an acceptable option.  The topic is clearly notable, even if I agree that many of the examples are both currently unsourced ''and'' likely unsourceable. Thus, a deletion is not a policy-supported option per , even though cleanup is clearly appropriate. Oh, and per , merging much of this content back into Gnosticism would be a less-preferred option, but with more policy support than an outright deletion
— User:Jclemens, 01:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:IPC (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)