Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trishana Gurung
The sources currently cited in the article demonstrate notability under both the broad principles of  and the specific criteria in . The ''Khatmundu Post'' and ''My City'' are both clearly reliable sources that are independent of the subject—and there is non-trivial coverage in each.{{Cite web|title=A tale of two singers|url=https://kathmandupost.com/weekender/2020/03/12/a-tale-of-two-singers|access-date=2020-10-06|website=kathmandupost.com|language=English}}{{Cite web|last=Lama|first=Sonam|title=5 things about Trishna Gurung|url=http://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/51486/|access-date=2020-10-06|website=My City|language=en}} By the same token, she satisfies criterion one of MUSICBIO, as she is "the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." In answer to ''~dom Kaos~'', neither of the aforementioned sources are press releases, and nowhere does it say that interviews are not both "non-trivial" and "independent" (be careful not to confuse publication of an interview ''in an independent publication'' with the unrelated warning against "''publications'' where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves" in MUSICBIO). I'm not convinced this is even an edge case—the article may suck, but the subject is notable
— User:Kilopylae, 11:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)