Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amos Yee
This is a tough one.  challenges the notability of the bio version of the article (it looks like most of the information about his other work are sourced to articles from the last couple days) while  and  require coverage that persists over time. We might consider  for an article about the video, but that too assumes coverage over time. It does ''look like'' coverage will continue, which inclines me to !vote weak keep since it seems like there's a notable topic in here, even if it requires renaming/refocusing. The problem is that it's conceivable, albeit far from likely, that the arc of the story dies off over the next day or two (for example, if all charges are dropped and no new videos come out). If that happens, it would wind up failing GNG/EVENT. That such a situation is possible makes me hesitant to say keep on a strict policy level (personal predictions of future coverage are not supposed to factor in). I will say, however, that the delete !votes above are particularly poor. {{ping|A.K.R.}} non-policy reasons are typically discounted by whoever closes this discussion. The idea that we should only cover a person accused of a crime if that person ''doesn't want'' us to cover him/her is seriously problematic per  (and ). {{ping|muckysock94}} what he did to become notable isn't really important and nobody has argued that "'he slandered...' thus he's notable", so you're burning a straw man. All that matters is whether there has been significant coverage in reliable sources -- coverage which persists over time. You should also be aware that arguing for deletion on the basis of no demonstrated coverage over time just means it'll be deleted for the time being -- it doesn't prevent it from being recreated as soon as that "over time" is satisfied. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 22:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:EVENT||WP:GNG||WP:WEBCRIT||WP:NPOV||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)