Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Agreeing with the comments above that this topic infringes on  and . It should also be noted that - given this topic is so new - there is no evidence of  coverage of the topic. As far as the  argument is concerned, topics that meet GNG are ''presumed'' to be notable, an issue in this case given that next to none of the  coverage of this topic seems to be indicating it will have long-term, encyclopedic significance. Deletion now is the best option, and if in the future more sources continue to sustain coverage of it then the article can be recreated
— User:SamHolt6, 14:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Too soon)