Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Steiner
per  and the sources extension of . I don't generally like to fall all the way back onto the root GNG for a delete !vote but it is quite clear about sourcing and "coverage".  is less of a factor if we are to take the claims in the article at face value and might warrant further discussion regarding precedent of similar articles, however these are entirely unverifiable and drags us back to GNG and BLP matters
— User:Tstormcandy, 08:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NNC||WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR (Wikipedia:Notability)