Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Chesnoff
I agree with you very strongly, in terms of keeping the page, and I also think the nomination and comments to delete were a bit hasty and do not address or take into account the huge volume of sources here.  And yes, that irritated me when I saw t.  But I want to encourage you to keep the discussion constructive.  Comments like "I don't have time to respond" can come across as dismissive to other editors.  If you edit wikipedia, other editors ''will'' waste your time--that's the nature of the beast.  99% of the time, they are not doing it intentionally and it doesn't have anything to do with you.  ssume good faith is a good guide.  This is important, because we are all sloppy at times, I certainly have made my share of bad or misguided edits or recommendations
— User:Cazort, 19:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:A (Wikipedia:Attribution)