Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pen clicking
Seriously, did ''anybody'' aside from the nominator actually bother looking at the sources?  This is one of the worst sourced articles I've ever seen anyone try to claim was a "good" article.  I'm not sure if a single one of them actually counts as a reliable third party source.  The vast majority of the sources are from completely unreliable "Top Ten" humor articles.  There's a youtube video, a "Yahoo Answers" link.  One of the so called "sources" is from a passage in a fiction book, where a character in it happens to be clicking a pen.  Even the sources that seem halfway decent barely talk about pen clicking specifically, merely mentioning is as an example of a bad habbit.  So, if you want a policy based reason for deletion, eliable Sources is a good start.  There's also the question of whether or not the subject even passes the .  While there are sources that mention the phenomenon as an example of a bad habbit, I'm not seeing much here that talks about the subject itself as anything that is independently notable
— User:Rorshacma, 17:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:R||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Redirect)