Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious violence
until there has been a chance to explore the topic further.  This is clearly a notable term and a notable topic both in mass culture and in academia.  Presently the entry is unreferenced and possibly bordering on  ''because of'' the lack of references.  I might agree with the idea of deleting the content and making a stub entry, but I don't think this nomination was the right course of action given that no other course of action was taken first.  For instance, the tags about original research and the lack of references only went up after the AfD nomination--see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religious_violence&diff=165379466&oldid=165091624 here.  I've added several books to the further reading section written on various aspects of this topic by prominent academics.  I hope that helps someone get started on improving it
— User:PelleSmith, 17:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)