Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August 2010 West Bank shooting (2nd nomination)
Per Wikipedia:Notability (events). I see there is no clear agreement, so I've tried to form my own opinion. First I brushed through August_2010_West_Bank_shooting#References|article's references. It seems sources define a topic here and it enjoys |general notability, since it is reported both by primary reliable sources like Ma'an, Jerusalem Post, Ha'aretz, YNET and also major international secondary reliable sources around the globe: Wall Street Journal, AFP, Washington Post, Reuters. Now what about ? There is violence in the region all the time. It seams to be routine. However not every violent event in the region reaches pages of Wall Street Journal. In this particular case, it appears sources discuss the event in context of Direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in 2010|current round of peace talks and it is reported and analyzed widely around the world. So I guess we have both ''historical significance'' & ''diversity of sources'' which are both Wikipedia:Notability (events)|'''Inclusion criteria
— User:AgadaUrbanit, 20:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Notability)