Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loughborough Students' Union
It seems to me that the people commenting here would be well-advised to consider the standards for notability at .  The best way to assert an organization's notability is by adding sources about it, preferably third-party ones from reputable places.  So far the only third-party source currently in the article is one about a shooting.  Which is hardly significant coverage of the organization itself.  I would also point out that the existence of other articles about student unions is a poor argument.  Most of those articles are not in a good state, and some are in quite poor state.  If you want to see examples of organizations where notability is well-established, try Skull and Bones or possibly Oxford Union.  OTOH, looking at the various student organizations with articles (both in the UK and the US, probably other countries as well), I see a lot which probably should be carefully examined
— User:FrozenPurpleCube, 21:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)