Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davina Reichman (2nd nomination)
This person is not the subject of substantial coverage by multiple reliable sources. While Cusop correctly points out that we're not limited to what's currently in the article, the talk:Davina Reichman|talk page provides a thorough discussion of why several previously offered sources failed on  or substantial coverage. If there's something else out there, show it to us. And need not refer to  because 1) there was no consensus to keep – the AfD resulted in no consensus; and 2) the biggest open question from the last AfD was whether this subject s any notability from her fashion show or her clothing line. In this case, I don't think the collective reliable coverage of Being Born Again Couture Fashion Show and iClothing supports notability for their founder, even if it could be ed, since neither the event nor the clothing is notable per . It's perfectly alright for a BLP |to contain non-notable content about otherwise notable people. But if the article contains only non-notable information, no matter how well it's cited, the subject still fails  requirements
— User:JFHJr, 23:48, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:INHERIT||WP:INHERIT||WP:GNG||WP:NNC||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)