Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Aronowitz bibliography
First, I believe we all agree that Mr. Stanley Aronowitz is a notable Acidemic with a justifiable article here on Wikipedia.  As such the inclusion of his bibliography incorporated/embedded on his page would not be questioned.  Which leads me to my Keep opinion on this  bibliography/list of Mr. Aronowitz works.  Lists, tables, and other material that is already in summary form may not be appropriate for reducing or summarizing further. If there is no "natural" way to split or reduce a long list or table, it may be best to leave it intact, and a decision made to either keep it embedded in the main article or split it off into a stand-alone page.  In looking at the Professor’s bibliography we see that he is a prolific author penning or majorly contributing to over 200 works.  As we can see here, http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=%22Stanley+Aronowitz%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,47, his works are considered important and cited 1,000’s of times.  If we were looking at just 5 or even 10 pieces I would just say '''Redirect and Merge''' to the main article.  However with over 200 pieces, my opinion is we would be over burden the main articial, which than makes a case for a stand-alone piece.  Many may say just shorten the list to those works that have been cited over a 1000 times.  Others will say, lets include pieces that have been cited 500 or more, and on and on and on.  My gauge point, for a piece to be considered passably notable, is when an article is cited 50+ times.  In Mr. Aronowitz case, that would be 50+ separate article, books, papers.  Which I believe justifies a stand-alone piece.  Thanks for listening
— User:Shoessss, 13:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPINOFF (Wikipedia:Content forking)