Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asylum Seekers (film)
The criteria for  are not yet met but, should the film be widely released at a later date, then it will satisfy criterion 1 of the guideline which requires it to be (i) widely distributed and (ii) to have received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. The second part of the criterion requirement is met by virtue of reviews by http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=18568 eFilmCritic and http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/news/2009/jun/14/asylum-seekers/ Las Vegas Weekly. Currently, though, the film does not satisfy the first portion of that criterion due to not having been widely distributed but http://www.screendaily.com/shoreline-acquires-worldwide-rights-to-asylum-seekers/4040155.article this article indicates that Shoreline Entertainment has obtained global distribution rights to the film so this should be treated as an indication that the film might be widely released at some point. Even barring that scenario, the film still passes the |general notability guidelines and  always trumps  or, for that matter, it trumps any other specialized versions of the general guideline. The film is, then, notable by virtue of significant coverage in the following sources: http://www.indiewire.com/article/a_total_artwork_asylum_seekers_director_rania_ajami/ indieWIRE, http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jun/14/asylum-seekers-filmmakers-get-noticed-nuptials/ Las Vegas Sun as well as http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/spring2008/redcamera.php Filmmaker Magazine. As the nominating editor mentioned, the main topic of last link is cinematography but the film is mentioned in a non-trivial manner and ''Filmmaker (magazine)|Filmmaker'' is definitely a reliable source. Per , "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material
— User:Big, 18:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FILMNOT||WP:N||WP:N||WP:FILMNOT||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)