Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsamara Amany
Notability is not conferred just by ''saying'' that the person "fulfills general notability" — it is passed by ''showing'' the |reliable source coverage ''about her'' that ''gets'' her over the bar: notability isn't a measure of what the article (or somebody commenting in an AFD discussion) says, it's a measure of the quality of the ''sources'' that are being shown to ''support'' what the article says. But being a political party apparatchik is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees inclusion, and the footnotes here aren't getting her over : the first just briefly namechecks her existence in the process of being primarily about other people, the second is just her |routine wedding announcement, and the third is just a photo gallery of her on what's clearly the Indonesian equivalent to ''Buzzfeed''. This is not the kind of sourcing it takes to make a person notable for serving on the organizational board of a political party
— User:Bearcat, 19:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)