Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThinkTank Learning
as per nom. First 50 results on Google return nothing but directory listings and contnt from the company. http://www.asianweek.com/2005/07/08/let%E2%80%99s-get-small-thinktank-learning/ this newspaper article refernced in the current articel does seem to be independent, but doesn't have much depth of coverage.  says "If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." I don't think this newspaper article has "substantial depth
— User:DESiegel, 18:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)