Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophy of Accounting
I've taken the initiave to clean up the article considerably, removing the (often incorrect) philosophical biolerplate, the empty citations of standards documents without connection to the philosophical issues announced in the lead, and so forth.  I've placed some '''key''' citation-needed tags to request citation of the key claims which go to the root of the question of this article's suitability for the encyclopedia.  Especially, we need a citation for the claim that the substance-over-form question is of philosohical import, and the claim that the rules for reporting raise epistemological concerns.  What is needed here--'''let me be perfectly clear'''--is not an argument that they are connected (that would be |original research, but rather, a citation to a secondary |verifiable source which asserts the connections in question
— User:Tb, 01:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:V (Wikipedia:No original research)