Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resignation of Shirley Sherrod
Rather than the "temporary keep" recommendtations above, I would suggest that the article, as it stands, violates the spirit of  and , and even though the information is sourced, its sources may not be the most neutral, and it is controversial and may well violate BLP guidelines.  With so much that is troubling about the article, why not rticle Incubator|incubate it until the story plays out, and then it can be introduced later if the event merits.  There is no rush to introduce information to Wikipedia, but there should be a rush to remove information that is injurious to living people
— User:WikiDan61, 13:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:A (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)