Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sore Thumbs
fails pretty much all our content policies as Wikipedia is not an internet guide and this is original research with no third-party reliable sources, let alone enough to write from a neutral point of view. This also fails the  guideline, not that we could keep an article that meets a notability guideline but fails multiple content policies. The idea that "The Comics Buyers Guide review ... satisfies Criteria 1 of  as do the print collections themselves" is incorrect. First, The Buyers Guide http://www.keenspot.com/pressbox/ article doesn't even mention this webcomic. Second, the single brief mention on that web page of this comic is in a press release, and a single mention in a press release is not independent of the site, or non-trivial, or for that matter multiple non-trivial and independent. Third, the http://www.amazon.com/Sore-Thumbs-1/dp/1932775242/ self-published book (with the Amazon sales rank of "none") is not an independent source either. My searches for non-trivial reliable third-party sources at my library have turned up nothing, let alone anything that suggests notability
— User:Dragonfiend, 07:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)