Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underdark
the article is sourced, just not properly sourced.  The smallest amount or research uncovers many books including quite a number of NYTimes Best Sellers, so it most certainly meets the requirements of . Plus according to , Fancruft is not a valid reason for deletion, but rather improvement.  Since there are no reasons remaining to support deletion the article needs to be kept, but improved
— User:Webwarlock, 19:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FICTION||WP:ITSCRUFT (Wikipedia:Notability)