Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David North (socialist)
Since the nomination appears to assess only sources that are in the article, keep in mind that "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article" (). A quick search finds ''New York Times'' coverage of his open letter to Google https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/26/technology/google-search-bias-claims.html, as well as multiple reviews of multiple books (e.g. reviews of ''In Defense of Leon Trotsky'' include Gaido, Daniel. ''The Russian Review'' Vol. 70, Iss. 2 (Apr 2011): 349; Cox, John K, PhD. ''International Social Science Review'' Vol. 87, Iss. 1/2 (2012): 63-65; and Patenaude, Bertrand M. The ''American Historical Review'' Vol. 116, Iss. 3,  (Jun 2011): 900.; see also https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0896920517699161 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/johs.12146). Even without going through the additional book review and news search hits, it looks like a #3 pass as someone who "has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work" that has been the subject "of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews
— User:Bakazaka, 09:23, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)