Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Ghanam
Note that people are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have Facebook and Twitter accounts, so the social media profiles listed above by Adham Hamam aren't relevant to whether this is keepable or not. A very large proportion of ''everybody'' who ''exists'' on the entire ''planet'' has one or both of those things now, so they aren't instant free passes to encyclopedic notability in the absence of |reliable source coverage ''about'' the person's work. And no, the fact that an article exists on another language's Wikipedia is not an instant notability freebie either, per  and . But when it comes to the sources present ''in the article'', what I'm getting is not notability-supporting reliable source coverage ''about Ahmed Ghanam'', but a mix of |primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things — which is not the kind of sourcing it takes to make a person notable enough for a Wikipedia article
— User:Bearcat, 16:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:WAX||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)