Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilmington Montessori School
It has been a quick learning curve since my first-ever wikipedia post on Saturday morning.  I agree that the NYT article on asbestos is non-notable.  I had previously removed that entry based on DGG's prior analysis, as noted on the article's talk page.  It was added back in by a well-meaning editor. I think that entry should be struck.  Also, I intend to strike the state-wide foundation grant refs, since I have come to better understand the importance of .  I think that the national listing that shows the school in the top 50 in the country alongside several very large organizations could probably remain.  Likewise, I think that the national grants/awards (Toyota/NSTA, ING) can remain.  After reading #Reliable Sources I am still unsure of the required notoriety of publications.  I understand the preference toward "respected publishing houses", but some additional guidance or comments regarding the use of the two separately published magazines would be appreciated
— User:Daddy, 15:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)