Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FundRazr
I appreciate some work has been done to clean this up but the fact remains that it exists purely to  the subject - written by the subject's marketing manager (please see ) who offers only an  argument for keeping this. I'm not excited about the blog reference, but the guy writing it seems reasonably credible. One of the other references really isn't coverage of the subject - it is coverage of an event that the subject's CEO attented. The few lines he snuck in about his company couldn't possibly be considered "significant coverage". The other blogs-for-sources aren't great either but there's one or two |reliable sources in there. I'm not so convinced it completely fails  so badly that I strongly favour deletion. All in all, a great lesson on how '''not''' to use Wikipedia for company PR
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 13:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROMO||WP:COI||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)