Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Battlestar Galactica (1978) and Battlestar Galactica (2003)
it is rather unfortunate that the |original research policy, originally designed to keep crackpot claims from being treated as legitimate encyclopedic facts, is being used to remove material such as this. The "claims" being made by this article are verifiable by anyone who has viewed the two series. This is as much "original research" as saying "the sun is hot" is; and while there do seem to be people who would demand a citation for saying "the sun is hot" (and sure, such a citation could be found, but that's not the point), common sense should override the literal application of policy. That's why we have |ignore all rules. The fact that license issues forbid us from transwiki-ing this to BSW only intensifies the arguement to keep, instead of allowing a good collaborative article like this to be wiped out in the collateral damage of hyperenforcement of policies, an inexplicable hatred of "fancruft", and incompatibilities of licenes
— User:DHowell, 00:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:No original research)