Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dutch oven (practical joke)
This nomination is made on the basis of . The nomination itself is also a strong case of  where the nominator self identifies that it is made "''as a particularly embarrassing...''" etc. The article is well referenced, with sufficient |reliable sources to ensure that it is shown as notable and verifiable. As we keep reminding ourselves, |Wikipedia is not censored. This nomination is a misguided attempt at censorship. The suggested merges are banal. How many other practical jokes should be merged to ''practical joke''? And what value woudl it add to ''flatulence''? It doesn't matter whether we ''like'' the article or not. There are many articles we don't actually ''like''. What matters is whether the encyclopaedia finds the article notable and verifiable. I submit that it is both of these, and demonstrably so with its citations
— User:Timtrent, 08:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:POINT||WP:RS||WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)