Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol Sawyer (4th nomination)
Why is this even an argument? The fact that it was AfD'd 3X before is not a good policy-based argument and thus should be ignored. However, the fact that he has his work in multiple museums is ''clearly'' enough to pass . And as always we don't delete an article because sources haven't been added yet, only if they do not exist. Which as you can see from multiple comments above mine, that there are plenty of sources, and reliable sources proving that his works are in multiple museums. If we are basing this AfD purely on policy, then the only option is to keep it. Regardless of history, or editors who clearly do not get along
— User:War, 01:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CREATIVE (Wikipedia:Notability)