Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioluminescence phytoplankton
While I appreciate Thincat's argument that there might be a notable topic behind all this, neither the title nor the content are salvageable. I do not see the point of keeping, moving the page and blanking it. I know there is genuine debate among editors about whether a poor article is better than no article at all ("redlinks are an incentive to writers!") but the wrong title surely tips the balance towards 
— User:Tigraan, 16:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)