Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drawbridge (company)
The reason given for the AfD nomination seems at the level of . For notability, I think we can use  as a guide. In this case, the Forbes, MIT Technology Review, BBC, and TelecomTV references already in the article are all secondary, in-depth, independent and from reliable sources. Reference 5, as a blog from the Guardian, may or may not be reliable, but it's also secondary, in-depth, and independent from a reliable news organization. With multiple secondary sources already extant in the article, the topic of the article is notable and the article should be kept
— User:Mark, 22:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)