Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Garvey
based mostly on her tenure as a powerful Diary Secretary (which is why re-directing to Jimbo is inappropriate). Looking up someone obscure (the WP is littered with obscure sports stars from the 1920s, etc) and drawing a blank ''is'' worse than having around some borderline notable entries. . It is likely true that the article was created in response to that line in the NYT magazine (I had the exact same thought - it's as if the reporter was issuing a challenge), but so what? The question ought to simply be whether or not she's notable
— User:Jnc, 13:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PAPER (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)