Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letitia Libman
Heck, it's borderline whether or not this article would qualify for a #A7 speedy.  To the extent that there's any (poorly written, buried lede) claim for notability in the article, it's that Libman was accused of using witchcraft to treat psychiatric patients in multiple lawsuits.  While the fact that the allegations were made and the suits were filed is well-documented, it appears that the cases were dismissed.  As the article is mostly about these cases,  is a massive problem.  Libman doesn't seem notable for any other reason, so  applies and is strong reason to delete the article.  If the UNDUE issue were resolved, the article would have no useful content. Therefore, an uncontroversial delete
— User:Macwhiz, 15:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CSD||WP:UNDUE||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)