Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SK Foods
Passes WP:GNG and WP:CORP. I reject the idea that because the available sources are primarily about the scandal a company has evidently perpetrated that those sources aren't also "about the company". What, do people want to rename the article to something like "The SK Foods bribery and price collusion scandal"? If a company comes to the attention of the media for its alleged crimes that's just as notable as if it were to come to the attention of the media for its takeover bids, its product innovations, or any other result of its business decisions and activities. It's ''all'' about the company, imo. Re Dennis'  suggestion, I can't see that, either. The relevant passage would seem to be, "Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. For example, routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia." I ''don't'' see this as "routine news", and I ''do'' see it as beyond the importance and inherent interest of "most newsworthy events
— User:Ohiostandard, 05:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWSPAPER (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)