Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Einesman
There are things here that could be potentially valid notability claims if he were properly sourced as the ''subject'' of enough |reliable source coverage ''for'' them to clear , but there's nothing here that makes him an automatic must-include just because he exists. And I'm not finding any strong evidence that he's been the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear GNG, either
— User:Bearcat, 15:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)