Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fanwank (2nd nomination)
Sorry if that sounded "wikipolitical"; I don't think  is the devil or anything, it just isn't precise enough for XfD use in my opinion. To get to the meat of the matter: I disagree in that the presence of a cleanup tag for an extended period of time simply means that editors have not spent enough attention and time on the article in question; it does not mean that the problems are insoluble or that there is something inherently irreparable about the article or its nature.  Just as a matter of logic.  Topics are "sexy" or not for rather arbitrary, unpredicatable reasons. Regarding "wank" and censorship, I was responding to the "delete" !voter immediately after the nomination, not to the nomination.  Re: "flurble", even I've heard that term before.  I can't recall the alleged meaning, but I'm almost dead certain I heard it on ''The Simpsons'', along with "d'oh" and "cromulent", etc., and I hardly ever watch that show; it frequently introduces nonce words that rapidly get absorbed by the culture, and which are reintroduced in subsequent episodes, reinforcing the absorption, so many G'hits for it is not surprising; try "sarcomulation" and "queeblor", two that I just made up out of nowhere, by way of contrast.  I'll be surprised if you get a single hit for either, despite both of them being perfectly valid potential words by English phonetic and morphological rules
— User:SMcCandlish, 14:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATT (Wikipedia:Attribution)