Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (3rd nomination)
According to . Having the article there is better for the site than to not have it. The article is factual, informative, and useful. While it may not fit strictly in a category with other articles, it is very much in the spirit of Wikipedia - it provides knowledge to the world. Wikipedia isn't going to run out of space, and this is a good article. Deleting it wold be a loss to Wikipedia. I'd suggest if you don't like maintaining this article, leave it to people who do. Also, not having a clear criteria for inclusion isn't really a reason for deletion - all articles have to have decisions made regarding what to include, that's part of the article creation/maintenance process. --Special:Contributions/58.96.69.23|58.96.69.23
— [[User talk:58.96.69.23|talk]]), 10:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)