Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard M. Waugaman
Not notable for his medical work. As a minor  Shakespeare scholar we need mainstream sources to provide a properly |neutral point of view on his work and how it differs from the mainstream. The Times Higher Education is such a source and, if kept, should be more prominently incorporated into the article text. But as a source for notability I think that article plus the Telegraph article on the same events fail 
— User:David, 17:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:NPOV||WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)