Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vahdam Teas
Being a chai-nnoisseur, I admit I hadn't heard of this brand. But I looked it up and the only proper, independent and reliable source I can find is this https://www.forbesindia.com/article/onlinefirst-brands/vahdam-teas-can-the-online-tea-empire-replicate-its-success-at-home/61411/1 recent Forbes story, where a note at the bottom says it appears in the print edition, which I know is held to a higher standard and fact-checking than a stray online story. This https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/newsbuzz/vahdam-teas-raises-rs-75-crore-led-by-sixth-sense-ventures/articleshow/71522828.cms Economic Times story  introduces it as "premium tea brand" and says it's present in US and Europe, but is probably from a press release? so a primary source?? There are many other similar stories, but nothing approaching the depth of the Forbes one. More experienced editors in this field need to take a call, but this might possibly be a case of . If they think Forbes source is enough, along with funding stories etc., it may well be kept. What the company is doing looks interesting, and if gets deleted now, I think months or a year or two down the line, I see no reason why it wouldn't get an article after more quality sources have reported on it independently. (No prejudice agains its good-faith creation
— User:MaysinFourty, 07:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)