Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love 101
Maybe, if you squint a little, meets the requirement of two reviews by recognized sources.  I am not extremely convinced that http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=9545&reviewer=128 EFilmCritic (aka Hollywood Bitchslap) represents a reliable source; on the other hand, Rotten Tomatoes counts them a source of critic reviews (and includes this one), so...  On the other hand, I don't see anything wrong with the http://www.avclub.com/review/love-101-19884 A.V. Club.  If you accept EFilmCritic, that's the standard, strictly speaking.  If you don't, well, there's a real review in the ''http://cjonline.com/stories/051200/wee_love101review.shtml Topeka Capital-Journal''.  That's unquestionably a reliable source, but whether it has the gravitas to count for  is sort of another question.  On the whole, I think I'd count the Topeka newspaper review, punt on the EFilmCritic reliability, and retain the article.  Barely
— User:Squeamish, 17:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFILM (Wikipedia:Notability)