Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JamVM
I'm striking the delete for now solely due to the apparent coverage in peer reviewed literature. However, I will note that I disagree with most of the other justifications for keeping made so far. For example,  is not a reason to keep - if you have problems with other articles nominate them too! Furthermore, readability of code does not necssarily make the subject notable - and it certainly isn't the job of Wikipedia to make the subject notable because it has readable code.  Equally, JamVM could shipped with every electronic device on the planet, however it still wouldn't be notable if there weren't reliable independent sources top atest to this
— User:Pit, 23:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERCRAP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)