Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Chitty
Now, I know it's an unreferenced BLP, but that in itself is not a reason to delete. Having read  fairly closely, it gives a lot of weight to the fact that there should be nothing contentious in a BLP, and I don't think there is here.  says ''A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.'' Now, if you type "Kathy Chitty" into Google you come up with lots of Paul Simon sites, all of which seem to verify what is written here, and which I would say counts as multiple independent sources. Furthermore, I think if anybody has a copy of http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=oatLSwAACAAJ&dq=paul+simon+-+a+life&hl=en&ei=SkpsTOLEDNjNjAe38aGDAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA this book I think we could put in a reliable source; there are also many other books about Simon which might provide enlightnment (and which I also don't have). Fundamentally you know, I don't like seeing an article which many wikieditors have worked on for nearly two years deleted
— User:Brichcja, 21:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)