Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discordian Works (3rd nomination)
anything that can be sourced to reliable secondary sources elsewhere and '''delete''' the rest. Primary - and biased - sources are entirely worthless in helping us decide on article inclusion. As it stands, the article consists of |original research and original synthesis and |unattributed material, which is not acceptable. If the article is cleaned up by the provision of reliable secondary sources that actually back up some of the claims made, then I will happily change my opinion to keep. As of now, though, delete
— User:Moreschi, 16:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:ATT (Wikipedia:No original research)