Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxxy (2nd nomination)
Subject meets  criteria 2. There are multiple reliable sources since 2009 detailing the subject, therefore demonstrating .  The fact that there is 9/20 YouTube sources isn't an issue; that's why we have  (and further, used in line with ). Note to the nom: |bludgeoning the process does not assist your cause
— User:MelbourneStar, 02:40, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ENT||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ABOUTSELF||WP:PST||WP:BLUD (Wikipedia:Notability)