Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Walker III
Passes  with significant coverage in multiple, reliable, and independent sources. Masem's contention that the coverage is  is baseless.  The coverage here includes feature articles in major news outlets that are the antithesis of routine coverage. Such coverage includes http://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/la-sp-ucla-kenneth-walker-20160907-snap-story.html this from the ''Los Angeles Times'' (the fourth largest newspaper in the US) which provides factual background on his childhood and his track career and provides a solid basis to construct a decent article. https://www.ocregister.com/2012/09/27/walkers-path-to-ucla-had-some-sharp-turns/ Here is another feature story from a major metropolitan daily providing depth of coverage. With in depth feature stories like these, I'm not sure how/why  would be a concern
— User:Cbl62, 14:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:WHYN (Wikipedia:Notability)