Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional United States Presidents (2nd nomination)
Can it with the "strongs" and the "ridiculouses" and "crufts."  As for NOT#INFO, exactly which part of that do you think applies?  I read it and it doesn't seem particularly relevant.  #PAPER seems more relevant.  If people wanted to study fictional representations of: US Presidents, first black presidents, women, assassinations of presidents, etc. it would be useful.  This isn't like providing great detail about trivia of a single (or even multiple) fictional universes.  And unlike, say, a list of "great wizards" or some such thing, this relates to a real subject of import.  There's no great detail about any of the individuals, no "waxing about their favorite books, movies, etc." and if that started happening, those additions could be deleted, rather than the whole list.  Actually, in some cases more detail would be desirable, like dates of publication, if someone wanted to study whether fictional representations of US Presidents occurred more often at certain times in history, and why that might be.  Why it would be argued that it makes sense to have individual articles without a list, I'm not quite sure.  There are individual articles of actual US Presidents and a list of them...? Regards
— User:Schizombie, 03:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)