Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secure Process-oriented Integrative Service Infrastructure for Networked Enterprises
The claims by the nominator that the Google Scholar hits are "not reliable, independent secondary sources" appear to me to be incorrect.  Some of them at least appear to have been published in peer-reviewed academic literature, which is the gold standard for Wikipedia reliable sources.  For example, https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-642-03964-5_10 this item.  The article also contains several references that appear to cite conference proceedings for conferences in which the authors were involved only as participants; if legitimate, these would also qualify as reliable, independent secondary sources.   The claim that the article is "written in gobbledygook" is unsubstantiated; it seems plausible to me that it is written in overly technical jargon with which the nominator is unfamiliar.  Either way "gobbledygook" is not a reason for deletion; see  ("the remedy for such an article is cleanup, ''not'' deletion").  Finally, nominator's claim that the article "is probably copypaste from somewhere" is pure speculation.  I suggest that the nominator should review the Google search results and the references cited in the article and, depending on the outcome, write a correct and substantive rationale for deletion, or withdraw the nomination
— User:Dominus, 16:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RUBBISH (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)