Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NodeXL
I disagree that the sources are too weak to pass . The "NodeXL and research" section of the article includes citations to peer-reviewed publications, at least two of which are not by members of the team. I have also added a link to a World Bank Group blog post that a) addresses the subject in detail, b) is reliable, c) is a secondary source, d) is independent of the subject and thus fulfills  in my understanding
— User:Vlad43210, 12:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)