Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outstanding leadership theory (2nd nomination)
Looks to fail , also looks to rely entirely on primary sources. I noticed that there are a surprising number of ghits for some of the article's text. Given the age of the article (and its previous home in the Leadership article), I'm assuming this would've been looked into last time around and found that it was the other sources that copy this (vs. a )? &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 03:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:COPYVIO (Wikipedia:Notability)