Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Late Bloomer Bride
per eologism. However, the nominators statement that "Most of the refs cited don’t make any use of the term at all" is false. When the article was nominated (along with when it was created), it contained two references cited. Both of these make use of the term and can also be viewed at the internet archive (see https://web.archive.org/web/20160303210516/http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/04/30/first-time-marriage-over-40/ and https://web.archive.org/web/20120306081055/http://latebloomerbride.com/about-this-blog/). I believe that this was likely an error made in good faith by the nominator
— User:MarkZusab, 00:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)