Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon CJ Graham
The sources that are apparently given show reliability. Stated with , we see that yes there are other wikipedia pages that probably have way less merit than this page does. The fact of the matter is, he has thousands of fans. Because of Jon CJ Graham's contribution to the Machinima project and because of the fact that his Machinimas remain to be the highest and most viewed videos, ought to be merit enough. Just because for right now he doesn't have any "high standard reliable" sources means nothing. His hard work and status as a Machinima maker ought to qualify him to have a wikipedia page. Obviously from what has been stated in this in this discussion(mostly from the above), calling his fans "die-hard" basically just opens the door to the fact that you are biased against him. Sometimes on Wikipedia, you guys confuse '''notability''' with what you actually care about. A great link for you is this,  I believe helps to merit this articles existence. It needs obviously clean up and is also obviously very incomplete. Thanks
— User:H, 05:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:INSPECTOR (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)