Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Banner
Per , , and others, as a |promotional Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|BLP about a local lawyer that lacks references, among the many supplied, advancing |notability. Wikipedia:Bombardment|Refbombing local |trivial court cases as an attorney, that I could not even find https://www.superlawyers.com/about/digital_magazine.html nationally listed in the http://digital.superlawyers.com/superlawyers/okslrs14?pg=16#pg16 top 50 of his field, and local commentaries and opinion pieces as an |author, does not establish notability. The ''many'' loaded language|loaded words  of "greatness" is |puffery, as well as |original research. GNG states ''"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content."''. Some of the content can only be understood by someone privy to information not supplied in the references. The policy on Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability states |''"Use sources that '''directly support the material''' presented in an article and are appropriate to the claims made
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:PROMOTION||WP:TRIVIAL||WP:OR||WP:SOURCES||WP:notability||WP:author||WP:puffery (Wikipedia:Notability)