Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of closed stack libraries
As far as I can tell, all of the keep !votes above boil down to  and . The list isn't well defined, but definition isn't the only requirement for a list to exist. Stand-alone lists are subject to notability criteria, and my search for other lists of closed stacks libraries (''not'' specific examples) turned up almost nothing but Wikipedia-derived content. There is a better case to be made for the subject article vs. the list (although |a move during AfD is frowned upon because it  it confuses what everybody's talking about), but I would say delete to the subject article as well. This is first because it's just a  (with a list of examples), but more importantly because I don't see sufficient sources to justify a stand-alone article. I wouldn't have any objection to merging selectively to another library-related article, though. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 21:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:USEFUL||WP:EDITATAFD||WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)