Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO Phil (3rd nomination)
The article currently looks extremely promotional and unclear and may qualify for , but notability seems to be available, and better then the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO Phil (2nd nomination)|previous nomination which ended in keep. I am not entirely convinced either way, but keeping in mind eletion is not cleanup and the recommendations in , it may be better to to rv to a old revision without the promotional content and start again from there
— User:Alpha3031, 03:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TNT||WP:D||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)