Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Antique Wireless Association Review
The ideal case would be having an article on the association and merging there however. But this fails . Agree with RK that if you wouldn't be notable as a scholar for having being cited X times, then you're not notable as a journal for having been cited X times. I mean, you have book literally called ''History of Wireless'' that cites it exactly https://books.google.ca/books?id=NBLEAA6QKYkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22The+Antique+Wireless+Association+Review%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjqpY71g4_jAhXBGc0KHcEZAjAQ6AEISjAG#v=onepage&q=%22Antique%20Wireless%20Association%20Review%22&f=false once. Of ''all'' places, if this journal was notable, it'd have been cited them a lot more than once in 577 pages. On google scholar, only 15 papers from the AWA review have been ever been cited. The citation counts are 36, 30, 15, 10, 9, 5, 5, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1. That's an h-index of 5.&#32
— User:Headbomb, 15:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NJOURNALS (Wikipedia:Notability)