Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Freak Hideout (4th nomination)
nbsp; Previously AfDed for WP:WEB and WP:CORP, no notability sub-guideline is identified here.&nbsp; As for the claim, "Article requires non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent...sources", no, notability is not a content guideline, see #Notability guidelines do not apply to content within an article.&nbsp; Since deadlinks are good as WP:RS references, just harder to locate, the nominator confirms that he/she has not read some of the good-faith sources already provided for this topic.&nbsp; Moving on, WP:BEFORE B4, B5, and B6 are issues.&nbsp; B4 has been dismissed with an argument whose source says, "If an article has been repeatedly nominated for deletion, sometimes users will recommend 'Keep'..., arguing that because the article failed to gain a consensus for deletion before, there is no reason to renominate it. This is a good argument in some circumstances..."&nbsp; B5 shows a large number of links being proposed for turning red, this number was reported in a previous AfD, and turning this many links red would seem to be a high-priority consideration for the nomination.&nbsp; I'm not convinced that 1800 edits to the encyclopedia are possible linking to a topic that has failed to attract the attention of the world at large over a period of time ( nutshell).&nbsp; As for B6, there are three foreign language websites not reviewed in the nomination.&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 19:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)