Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Èrs people
per . The article depends on just one source. AFAIK, this hypothesis is not further discussed or elaborated in other sources. Therefore, it does meet the criteria for a standalone. As an alternative for deletion, we could merge and redirect somewhere, but then, we also have to check for  and . Not everything that has been proposed somewhere at some time has to be mentioned in WP. There should be at least a certain degree of scholarly impact. However, at the current state of the article, I cannot see that. Even after 10 years, all other citations in the article are about circumstantial information, but not about "Èrs people
— User:Austronesier, 12:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:UNDUE||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Notability)