Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyPHP
failing that, '''Redirect''' to WAMP) at https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22EasyPHP%22 422 hits on G Books,  http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22EasyPHP%22 479 on GScholar & https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22EasyPHP%22&num=50 560,000 hits on Google it easily passes  IMO. Also note that one of its versions has been downloaded some http://download.cnet.com/EasyPHP/3000-2212_4-10079659.html 225,000 times on Cnet further indicative of popularity. Additionally, per therstuffexists, there is no reason to have articles on the Linux & MAC equivalents (cf. MAMP, DAMP (software bundle), Bitnami, Apache2Triad) and ignore EasyPHP being the popular Windows equivalent. It will be really absurd of Wikipedia to have a red link for something as popular. (note the number of people looking for it even as it has been deleted http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/EasyPHP
— User:Tachfin, 14:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:O (Wikipedia:Notability)