Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texe Marrs (2nd nomination)
closest this topic comes to "significant coverage" is the NYT piece, which is ''primarily'' on taxpayer subsidisation of non-profit postage, ''secondarily'' on Marrs' newsletter as one of the more bizarre examples of this, and only ''tertiarily'' on Marrs himself. I would also suggest that the further out on the  a person is, the more careful we should be that we have solid coverage, not just a few sensationalised and bizarre claims
— User:Hrafn, 04:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)