Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/July 29 in rail transport
WP:TRIVIA clearly states that it is '''not''' a reason for removal or addition of information, just how to present it. If there is no other way to present valid and sourced information, lists are perfectly acceptable. Thus you cannot argue any nomination for deletion based on it.  does not apply to these articles, as none of it aims to forbid such lists as those proposed for deletion here. The arguments brought forth for deletion are mostly variations of |"I don't like such lists", paired with |vague-waving at some shortcuts that do not really apply to those articles but sound good to the casual observer. With no real policy-backed reasons to delete them, keeping is to be preferred. Regards
— User:SoWhy, 09:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:VAGUEWAVE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)