Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luv Israni
Also should be noted that this article had previously been a draft at Draft:Luv Israni, but was deleted about 4 days ago as abandoned. {{u|बहिर्जी नाईक}} was not the account that created the draft, yet both versions contain ridiculous language about the subjecting having "a keen eye for directing"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luv_Israni&oldid=775351886https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=Draft%3ALuv+Israni&timestamp=20160811105429 (only admins will be able to see the deleted article). I suspect paid editing here, or COI, given that the creator of this article also took a stab at an article on Megha Israni, again with promotional language and insufficient establishment of notability. As for Luv, even running his name through the http://searchindiannews.in/search.html?query=%22luv%20israni%22#gsc.q=%22luv%20israni%22&gsc.page=1 Indian newspaper custom search I don't find sufficient articles to warrant a unique article. I see http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Israni-siblings-to-capture-Harbhajan-Singh-Geeta-Basras-love-story-on-film/articleshow/49494328.cms this, which is a passing mention and http://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/a-new-generation-of-indians-is-experiencing-the-joys-of-convertibles/story-Qp6vopfCYIyu8r9cyROy0K.html this, another passing mention, and  http://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Sunday-Hans/2017-04-02/Focusing-on-Passion/290476 this, which is an interview (and thus insufficient for notability as ). The guy probably has lots of credits and may be well-known in the industry, but there is a lack of substantive independent coverage. Even the article creator had trouble finding references as noted in the Talk:Luv Israni|contested speedy-deletion nomination. So I think delete, since I don't see where we could intuitively redirect
— User:Cyphoidbomb, 15:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY (Wikipedia:No original research)