Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplilearn (2nd nomination)
Lots of different takes and confusion above but in my opinion, much of the confusion above stems from 2 things. The first, some editors are looking at the wrong guidelines and putting far too much emphasis on . RS is probably the lowest standard to reach. The correct guideline for an organization is  and . Second, nobody has mentioned  and the fact that a reference must pass both CORPDEPTH *and* ORGIND - it isn't an either/or situation. Just about all of the references in that table above fails ORGIND. For example, https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/322387 this from entrepreneur.com recites verbatim an interview with the CEO and has no "Independent Content" - a clear failure of ORGIND. It doesn't matter in the slightest if a journalist puts their name on the article or not - that doesn't make the content "Independent Content". According to the ORGIND definition for Independent Content, the article must contain ''"original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''"''. Not a single one of those references meets the NCORP criteria
— User:HighKing, 13:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)