Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States support for ISIS
or failing that, redirect or merge anything Reliable and legitimate. Severe problems with unreliable sources, , , and misrepresentations. RT is utterly unreliable, and the Iranian source aren't much better. It's absurd to suggest that hardware stolen or diverted to ISIS by third parties constitutes support. It's absurd to suggest that Trump's wacky quote about "Obama founded Isis" belongs in here. It's absurd to suggest two instances of the US ''not attacking'' constitutes "support" - especially when at least one was a tactical decision to protect civilian lives. It's absurd to suggest that prisons being a ''metaphorical'' "training ground" constitutes support. And I was particularly unimpressed when Iranian PressTV cited a rant by someone who is basically an elected dogcatcher in Virginia, as if that accurately represents or reflects US foreign policy. This isn't even a , because a POVFORK would actually require proper sourcing to support the alternate POV. In this case the only POV being presented are things being falsely represented as "support" along with a dash of routine RT-fiction. There's a damn good reason we don't cite RT for anything but Russia's official position and (occasionally) for basic uncontroversial facts
— User:Alsee, 01:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:No original research)