Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lords of the Nine Hells
per both our |notability and |verifiability requirements, if there are no third party sources discussing a topic then we should not have an article on it. I've done a bit of a search, and the best I could find outside of D&D's own publications was a passing mention on a gamer website. It is not enough to AGUEWAVE|wave your hands airily going "There'll be sources out there somewhere"; the |onus is on the defenders of such material to prove it. This is especially true when others have tried and failed to find the required sources
— User:Reyk, 05:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:BURDEN (Wikipedia:Notability)