Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American police officers killed in the line of duty
Wikipedia:Incomplete lists|Incomplete lists are fine. List of numbers is a good example. The selection criteria are not vague: every law enforcement death is officially recognized as either in the line of duty or not. It's one or the other. |Surmountable issues are not a valid reason for deletion. So whatever problems may exist with the sources can be fixed. If the current content is too recent, that can be fixed. If it grows too large, that can be fixed by spawning sub-lists.  says "Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements." But this isn't about creating an ''article'' on every officer death. Many things in WP:NOT deal with not creating separate ''artices'' on a thing, which can be misunderstood to mean whole classes of content can't appear ''within'' an article or list. That's not what it means. in the Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates|Categories, lists, and navigation templates guidelines explains that some list member are all notable with their own article, but other lists are simply members of a group, in themselves not notable enough for a stand-alone article.If poorly sourced entries are being added, well, clean them up. It's not like every other list on Wikipedia doesn't suffer the same maintenance problem. That goes with the territory.The talk archive issue is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_American_police_officers_killed_in_the_line_of_duty&diff=801180060&oldid=791308581 now fixed
— User:Dennis, 04:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:CSC (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)