Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lathander
Something many arguing here fail to realize is that a "novel" or "game guide" is not a reliable, third-party |source. Any interpretation of such works is |original research and should not be included in a Wikipedia article.  What the article should be based on is ''third-party'' examination of primary sources such as game guides.  If a D&D periodical had written an article "The Importance of Lathander" or something, then that would qualify as a source. As it is, this article contains no such outside confirmation of notability, and those in favor of keeping it have made no assertions that such sources exist
— User:Livitup, 16:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)