Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul G. King
Because the subject is a proponent of the fringe anti-vaccine movement, I feel that the citation counts are not an appropriate indication of the notability under the  guideline, which is intended to assess an individual's mainstream scholarly impact.  Many of the papers listed on Google scholar appear to be  research, with lots of self-citations, and low quality open-access echo chamber citations.  Google scholar is a notoriously unreliable indicator of notability of academics for those at the fringes.  The most over-the-top example I know of is https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Florentin+smarandache%22&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33 Florentin Smarandache
— User:Sławomir, 15:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Notability)