Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Isaac Fine
The offsite |canvassing evidenced above is utterly unacceptable, and taints the AfD in a shameful way. That said, there is some weak evidence of notability, but this requires first the article to be completely pruned of everything coming from questionable sources and BLP1E concerns are to be addressed. Since this can be addressed with editing, the article should be |kept for now (Userfying could be a nice option if BLP concerns are too strong), but for sure the situation has to be dealt with seriously if the meatpuppetry continues. In particular, the article creator must learn that canvassing offsite is the best way to get his article deleted and his account banned. We're not morons
— User:Cyclopia, 16:24, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CANVASS||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Canvassing)