Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William W. McCorkle Jr.
OK, I've researched all the references posted above.  I should point out that this is really moot because this AfD is about the subject's notability per !  Anyway, most of them I can't verify through Google, but based on the titles it would appear as though the majority of these are listings in calendars or upcoming events in the publications: "Club Hopping", "Hot Dates", etc., would not meet  #1 under the second exception (''Works comprising merely trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories.'').  I was able to verify an independent review of the subject in the Santa Monica Mirror, and it definitely meets  #1, but it's only a single reference and  #1 seems to call for ''multiple non-trivial published works''.  Based on the references provided I would still vote '''Weak delete''' for the musician's article at this time pending further research.  Here's a summary
— User:Chuuumus, 17:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC (Wikipedia:Notability)