Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Lataster (3nd nomination)
the opinions above are correct that  is not relevant if this person meets the GNG.  But I'm not at all sure that they meet the GNG.  The only source that is in depth, about Lataster specifically, and unquestionably independent is http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2014/12/24/4154120.htm this one.  The others are either in very obscure sources, or are written by Lataster themself (including the Washington Post one mentioned above
— User:Lankiveil, 02:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)