Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Research Center for Women & Families
Looking at Google http://www.google.com/search?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22National%20Research%20Center%20for%20Women%22&cf=all&sa=N&tab=pw and Google News Archives http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22National+Research+Center+for+Women%22&cf=all and Google Books http://books.google.com/books?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22National%20Research%20Center%20for%20Women%22&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np, I don't see a single source that gives substantial, in-detail coverage of the organization as a whole, but I do see many, many references to the group that, taken as a whole, show that it's an influential organization. Sources such as ''The Washington Post'', http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/24/AR2009092404272.html?hpid=moreheadlines http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/718353431.html?dids=718353431:718353431&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+21%2C+2004&author=&pub=The+Washington+Post&desc=CORRECTIONS&pqatl=google ''USA Today'' (where the organization has its own page in the newspaper's online archives http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/National+Research+Center+for+Women), and the Associated Press (most recent http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jjyjRfFZhLWGMe3kPR_UfAuYpiswD9AK22201) all seem to respect this organization. If there weren't so much of it, I'd favor deleting, but as  states: ''If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability.'' In a practical, common-sense level, it's good for readers to be able to find an article about a group that gets quoted advocating or commenting in the media so much
— User:JohnWBarber, 20:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)