Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GatherSpace
four re-lists? I'll bite. As the nominator suggests, many of the sources aren't really |reliable sources. Of those that are, some seem to be more focussed on the creator and his "vision" rather than the company itself. I think we would need more in terms of quality "significant coverage" to substantiate . http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/1530-cloud-based-software-requirements-management.html This sort of thing is good, but http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Levy_Darren_1404379867.aspx this sort of thing is basically worthless as a source for conferring |notability. Quite a few of the sources seem to have been prompted by one particular announcement which doesn't really suggest "depth" to me - short term quantity over longer term quality. Another one of these, ''"what's the CORP version of BLP1E?"'', cases
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 03:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)