Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Liberation of Intellect: Neohumanism
or '''merge and redirect''' to Neohumanism. Fails . I agree that significant secondary source coverage is required for a stand-alone article. The assertion has been made that this exists, but I don't see it. The target Neohumanism has enormous issues in that it is built on almost exclusively primary sources, but that can be dealt with separately. The arguments here are almost identical to those voiced in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neohumanism in a Nutshell and in many other recent Afds concerning articles developed by Sarkar's proponents
— User:Location, 16:47, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)