Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lochtegate
Still thinking, but I do want to bring up that the notability guideline is clear that even if topics may be considered notable under relevant notability guidelines, that does not mean that a standalone page ''must'' be created as a matter of editorial judgment. Per : {{tq|When creating new content about a notable topic, editors should consider how best to help readers understand it. Sometimes, understanding is best achieved by presenting the material on a dedicated standalone page, but it is not required that we do so. There are other times when it is better to cover notable topics, that clearly should be included in Wikipedia, as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context.}} Also, per Yngvadottir, , , and  definitely factor in. We must be especially cautious of Wikipedia:Recentism|recentism bias. The controversy is still fresh in our minds, and so we might be giving more weight to it than it would really be worth five years down the road. How big is this in the context of Lochte as a whole
— User:Mz7, 15:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PAGEDECIDE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:UNDUE||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)