Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Münsterstraße (street in Dortmund)
without a doubt. The street clearly meets  with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. The German article calls it "one of the oldest and most historically significant streets in Dortmund", the eighth-largest city in Germany. That article has several pages of high-quality content, and 31 citations. The street has coverage in news media, travel, and history books, Dortmund Tourism has produced a https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d0FwILV6h8 video guide to the street, and the street has its own website at https://www.muensterstr.de produced by the neighborhood's ''Interessengemeinschaft Münsterstraße'' (community association of Münsterstrasse). Even the nominator admits the German Wikipedia article shows that the subject is notable. However, statements like "the article is definitely not notable in its current shape" are mistaken - the question of notability is purely whether the subject itself is notable or not, which is unrelated to how well or poorly the article is written or sourced - see . If it is established that the subject meets the notability guidelines by the existence of coverage in reliable sources, non-notability cannot be an argument to delete the article. Possible , too few citations, or poor-quality writing, are ''content issues'' that must be solved through the appropriate procedures including talk page discussion and good faith effort to improve the article. There is  for that. Deletion of the page and its edit history via AfD is not an appropriate method to address content issues
— User:IamNotU, 21:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ASSERTN||WP:PROMOTION||WP:NODEADLINE (Wikipedia:Notability)