Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superosity (2nd nomination)
trim to stub if necessary. There seem to be some third party sources. More importantly, I’d like to remind everybody that opining on AFD carries the responsibility of actually checking your facts. The article has been deleted exactly once, by the A7 criterion. It has been undeleted, not reposted. Regardless of that, it does not qualify for speedy deletion under G4, since that is only for items deleted by an XFD process and the first nomination of this article was closed not by consensus but because the article had been deleted in a different way. So, will the ‘speedy delete’ people please refresh their memory of  and reconsider
— User:xyzzy_n, 12:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CSD (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)