Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parodies of Sarah Palin
WP:BLP and  both come to mind. Wikipedia articles should not be a list of "everything that makes you think this person is stupid or ridiculous." Parodies are by definition things that make a person look bad, and collecting them solely on one page creates a page that ''only'' serves to contain negative material about the subject. I quote directly from the BLP policy: "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid paper; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating" commentary about people, however notable. The speedy deletion of Criticism of Barack Obama set a precedent that even ''legitimate'' criticism of a notable figure should not be collected on a one-sided page. Parodies certainly deserve less consideration
— User:RayAYang, 17:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATP (Wikipedia:Attack page)