Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MusicBlvd
No, Olowe2011. This article absolutely doesn't violate the section "''External links to commercial organizations '''are acceptable''' if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article''". Read that line carefully. The website used in the company infobox is the company's website. This is the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patriotic_Nigras&diff=520933922&oldid=520358271 second time I notice you making this claim. From briefly looking at this article it looks fine. Adweek, Business Wire, and NY Daily News are all RSes. The refs aren't very impressive, but they're not AfD worthy. WP:SOAP is about keeping unrelated material off of wikipedia. We don't want the article on law review journals to become a linkfarm for all ABA accredited schools to promote themselves, but if it's an article on the Harvard Law Review then it's perfectly acceptable to contain a link to the Harvard Law Review's webpage. That's not SOAP, that's |common sense
— User:Thibbs, 19:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UCS (Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means)