Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powow River Poets (2nd nomination)
plenty of passing mentions on various poetry blogs and mentions of membership in relation to particular poets, but not a lot that could be considered "significant coverage". I suppose we would need it to pass , which I don't think it does. There are a few articles like http://www.newburyportnews.com/lifestyle/x364973768/Powow-River-Poets-at-festival-this-weekend this and http://www.newburyportnews.com/lifestyle/x845856273/The-Lookout-Powow-River-Poets-share-one-final-verse-before-moving this from their local paper. They have also published http://books.google.com.au/books/about/The_Powow_River_Anthology.html?id=zxKIAAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y an anthology (not ) but that would be by the subject, not about the subject. On balance, not really enough for me to consider it |notable but not so strongly non-notable that I strongly believe it should be deleted
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 01:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:SELFPUB||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)