Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scene (2010s subculture)
The 2 sources added are still insufficient and of questionable reliability. The Sydney Morning Herald article was already discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scene (youth subculture)|the previous AfD and found to be a very poor source, woefully insufficient to support an encyclopedic article on the topic (one glance at the source shows why...). The second source (VideoJug) appears to be some kind of "how to" blog...a glance at the site's http://www.videojug.com/ home page indicates to me that it likely doesn't pass . AbbaIdea2010's previous "sources" for the article were blogs and last.fm user profiles; also clearly unreliable, and he claimed they were "the best I could find."  requires "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy", and I've seen no sources in this or any of the past incarnations of "scene" articles that approach this threshold. I would be satisfied with 2 or 3 sources giving substantial coverage to the topic of "scene" in reliable mainstream press (ie. nationally distributed music or style magazines), but none seem to exist at this time. Given the poor quality of the 1 or 2 tenuous sources that have been found, I'm still unconvinced that this is anything more than a |neologism, and I would not expect an article on it to be able to reach even a C-level of quality given the lack of available sources
— User:IllaZilla, 19:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)