Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shock site (3rd nomination)
per Tbeatty and others. None of the support arguments are particularly convincing - the article currently lacks reliable sources, violating a couple of rather important "Double-yew-pee-colon" thingos. "It ''may'' have sources!" isn't convincing &mdash; someone needs to turn up with the |goods (after a long time of sourcing stagnation, as Mangojuice says above), as it doesn't cut it at the moment-K
— User:Kangie, 14:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)