Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of film sequels considered better than the original
IMO, this article is inherently POV and violates  because the act of choosing to assess a pair of films for inclusion in the list is arbitrarily decided by the editor. It isn't an analysis process carried out by a verifiable third party that is then cited in WP. So however careful the editors are, it will always fail . The article's current POV crowbarring in of films that do not fit the alleged selection criteria is just the icing on the cake. If it existed as "List of films considered by someone reliable and verifiable to be better..." then it would be a different story. But it isn't
— User:DaveG12345, 02:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)