Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusebox (programming)
all the sources I could find on topic are not independent (at best they are ColdFusion-centered, which is a very narrow scope, leaving the otability|Notability guideline's connotation of deferring the decision of notability to independent reliable sources unmet). The claim of historic (and probably current) significance of this title would save the article, but only if it is itself made in reliable source independent of topic, not by Wikipedia editors or sources that focus on ColfFusion and thus have substantial bias towards mention of related topics. —&nbsp
— user:czarkoff, 17:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)