Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Luginbill (2nd nomination)
for now) - I'm more than happy to consider the case put forward by the ''keep'' crowd but I must say, it's very difficult to do with the sources the way they are. It's not clear which sources are supposed to |verify which claims and some are just obviously unreliable. Do any of the "keepers" want to have a crack at cleaning it up so we can get a better appreciation for those sources that ''might'' confer notability
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 01:01, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)