Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedman (unit) (2nd nomination)
This article does not come close to failing . The submission says that "the term has been mentioned, briefly, in a handful of reliable sources, but that specifically does NOT establish notability per ." This is simply not true. In fact,  says that "to support the use of (or an article about) a particular term we must cite reliable Wikipedia:No original research#Primary.2C_secondary.2C_and_tertiary_sources|secondary sources such as books and papers ''about'' the term &mdash; not books and papers ''that use'' the term." The article specifically cites several reliable secondary sources that satisfy that requirement exactly, including the Washington Post, Editor & Publisher, and the Huffington Post. If anything, the article as it stands now is a pretty good example of an article that ''does'' satisfy both pillars of 
— User:PHenry, 02:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)