Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewontin's Fallacy
I've added further sources to the articles, such as http://books.google.com/books?id=OKSL_N0tybsC&pg=PA115&dq=%22Lewontin's+Fallacy%22&hl=en&ei=JQIeTo-DBcXXiALGhe3-CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Edwards&f=false The SAGE Handbook of Race and Ethnic Studies, http://books.google.com/books?id=rR9XPnaqvCMC&pg=PA406&dq=%22Lewontin's+Fallacy%22&hl=en&ei=JQIeTo-DBcXXiALGhe3-CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Lewontin's%20Fallacy%22&f=false The Ancestor's Tale, and http://books.google.com/books?id=KKrsBcU_DikC&pg=PA76&dq=%22Lewontin's+Fallacy%22&hl=en&ei=JQIeTo-DBcXXiALGhe3-CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22Lewontin's%20Fallacy%22&f=false DNA: promise and peril. It is also true that Lewontin's Fallacy is clearly the  by far. There is a significant amount of discussion within the academic field about Edwards' paper and it is definitely notable
— User:Silver, 21:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COMMONNAME (Wikipedia:Article titles)