Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuckey and Murray
I can't find evidence for meeting  (their reviews don't meet 4c), and the article doesn't claim any. For GNG, there are three independent RS with nontrivial coverage available: reviews in the http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20150605/PC2106/150609520&ampsource=RSS Post & Courier, http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/stuckey-and-murray-offer-sketches-and-songs-on-whatever-makes-them-laugh/Content?oid=5215845 Charleston City Paper (Cohen) and http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/stuckey-and-murrays-song-sketches-will-leave-you-cringe-crying/Content?oid=5222433 CCP (Oyer). (There's more in their http://stuckeyandmurray.com/press/ press clippings, but nothing substantial as far as I can see).) These sources do not have enough depth of coverage to verify basic encyclopedic information like their location, major career events, and influence within their field
— User:FourViolas, 04:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Notability)