Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Robertson controversies
How is the article not just presenting stuff that he's gotten in trouble for?  states "'''Criticism''' and praise '''should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources'''" (emphasis mine). For attack pages it says "Pages that are '''unsourced and negative in tone''', and which may disparage the subject, should be deleted," (emphasis mine, the article neutrally reports the negative reactions Robertson has gotten, with reliable secondary sources).  and  do not require, insist, or even support us kissing any article subject's butt. The article simply reports that much of the media has disapproved of much of Pat Robertson's behavior, and presents individual cases as examples. The only reason to remove this page would be to |give equal validity for his supporters, which isn't something that we're required to do
— User:Ian, 19:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:BLP||WP:GEVAL (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)