Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goold v Collins and Ors
Following the discussion above, and my own  efforts, I do not support deletion based on the argument(s) made by the nominator. The argument (that the retention of this article constitutes a breach of privacy legislation or court protection order) doesn't stack up. And the argument (that the "article currently published is out of date and irrelevant") is not typically considered a valid reason for deletion. If there are other arguments to be made, then I am not aware of what they might be. Absent a valid or substantiated deletion argument, mine is a "keep" recommendation
— User:Guliolopez, 11:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)