Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KZYY-LP
Radio stations do have to have sources, which this does, but there is no requirement in  that the sources have to attain whatever standard of in-depth analysis Onel is applying here over and above what these sources already show. The principle at NMEDIA is that, and this is an ''exact quote'' from NMEDIA, "As media outlets are themselves a significant proportion of our sources for other content, however, it serves an important purpose for Wikipedia to provide neutral and verifiable information about those sources so that readers are able to evaluate their reliability and scope. Accordingly, the notability standards for media organizations and content are designed to be as inclusive, not restrictive, as possible within the bounds of verifiability in reliable sources." Would it be nice if every radio station on earth had at least one full book written about its entire history by a professional radio historian? Sure, of course it would. But the existence of such a book is not a core requirement for a radio station to be notable: the requirements are that the station has a broadcast license from the appropriate regulatory authority for its country, that it has originated at least some of its own programming instead of operating strictly as a rebroadcaster of another station, that it is actually on the air and not just a silent paper license or construction permit, and that all three of those facts are verifiable in sources independent of itself. And this station passes all four of those conditions
— User:Bearcat, 15:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BCAST (Wikipedia:Notability)