Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge
Of course this is one of the sillier articles ever on WP (an article on an unborn child? Really?) Of course the child is |only notable because of its parents (who themselves are only notable because ''she'' is married to ''him'' and he's only notable because of ''his'' parents). But as long as we have this medieval institution of royalty around, people will have this (rather unhealthy) fixation with royal families (who nowadays really don't do much of any real importance) and write articles in otherwise respectable newspapers about unborn children, gossip about little kids, etc. And, unfortunately, that makes these fetuses, children, and adults notable under . This need for royal fables apparently is something inherently human (remember that the French Revolution -supposed to make an end to monarchy for once and ever- ended up with putting an emperor on the throne
— User:Randykitty, 13:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)