Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schrödinger's Rapist
Schrödinger’s Deletionist is a term..." - No, I won't continue - we already have two too many heavy-handed parodies of the nominated article in this discussion, and a nomination in which only about three words are devoted to giving a valid deletion reason (parodiability is '''not''' a deletion reason) and of which over half is in blatant breach of . Turning to the article itself, the subject is a meme which I have seen quite a few times - but I accept that the article does not have quite the quality of sources we require for notability and I have not identified better ones on a quick search. But that is no reason for gratuitously irrelevant attacks on the article and its creator
— User:PWilkinson, 20:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPA (Wikipedia:No personal attacks)