Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CamGSM
This is pretty scant coverage.  The company name is mentioned briefly in one article and the other article where there is some additional "coverage" is in some minor trade publication which I could find had only been used in one other article in all of wikipedia as a reference.  Like I said originally, the only notable thing that ever happened to this company was an investment in it by a small private equity firm that seems to be eager to draw attention to itself.  I think when you step back this is a stretch.  It is one of six or seven mobile phone companies in Cambodia (maybe it is the largest but where is the verification of this?), there is limited third party coverage and the only reason there is an article is because a problematic COI editor intends to use it for .  I tend to be an inclusionist but I find little reason to support keeping this article.  There is limited content of any value and if you wanted to save it, the better route would be to show what would be done with the article
— User:Urbanrenewal, 14:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ADVERT (Wikipedia:Advertising)