Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limiting case (philosophy of science)
The topic is notable — see ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pEzcsK1wlVYC&pg=PA237 The Philosophy of Science'', for example.  It's not clear to me why their jargon is ''limiting case'' rather than ''limited case'' but that's by the way.  Note also that the |vague wave to  in the nomination is quite inappropriate:  "''One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written. Another perennial source of confusion is that some paper dictionaries, such as "pocket" dictionaries, lead editors to the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent
— user:Andrew, 12:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)