Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Petersen (politician)
While {{u|ErieSwiftByrd}} makes a cogent if  point, I would contest that Petersen's position in Maricopa County is not within the scope of  notability. Montgomery has notability thru the AZ Supreme Court, Penzone is Arpaio's replacement (and even that is a shaky argument of notability), and Purcell has the legal notability. Petersen would not meet  for his municipal government work, and would be a case of  for the adoption controversy. For the IP who voted, it is not Wikipedia's responsibility to be a  or . If you'd like to add more information about adoption reform in the United States, you can add that to the existing article on Adoption_in_the_United_States#Adoption_reform|Adoption in the United States
— User:Bkissin, 16:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OSE||WP:NPOL||WP:NPOL||WP:1E||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)