Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Notre Dame attack
that while article creator (497 edits to date) is a , Nom is an editor with vast experience who ought to have followed .  As the closing editor wrote  at a similar article that was rushed to deletion by Mr. X a couple of weeks ago and closed as No consensus, "Additionally, the incident happened very recently, and new information is still coming out about it. This article was created on the day of the incident, and the AfD was started 8 hours after the article was created (which is discouraged by  for this very reason). There will be a better opportunity for a stronger consensus to emerge after the dust settles."  As an editor who regularly works on terrorism-related articles, I have real fear that rushing articles on breaking news events of this kind can tend to  the project by forcing editors - especially new editors - to run the AfD gauntlet.   I strongly suggest that Mr X withdraw this.  If his opinion is unchanged  a few months, he can nominate it then
— User:E, 17:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEWBIES||WP:RAPID||WP:DISRUPT (Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers)