Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LinkStation
If a page like this were  wouldn't it be advocating something other than how easy it is to misuse the product to get it to do something it wasn't made to do in the first place?  I mean geez, how notable does it need to be?  http://reviews.cnet.com/Buffalo_LinkStation_160GB/4505-3382_7-30980068.html CNET thought it was notable enough to review it, as did http://reviews-zdnet.com.com/Buffalo_LinkStation_250GB/4505-3382_16-30979536.html ZDNET, not to mention http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT9676199755.html LinuxDevices and http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1641390,00.asp PC Magazine.  How about the http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinkStation_General Linkstation General Yahoo group with 2,799 members?  If this isn't notable, then perhaps maybe neither is the Playstation
— User:Reswobslc, 01:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ADS (Wikipedia:Spam)