Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of edible invasive species
article not based on any sources, indeed it says it was "listified" from a category, which of course had been constructed piecemeal and at random. The narrow taxonomic focus - higher plants and familiar animals - says volumes about the ish method of selection of these species. This listicle is a disgrace to Wikipedia - we need to be getting rid of the whole idea of the uncited list ("oh, it's all right, it's got bluelinks") and basing lists (if any) on comprehensive, reliable sources. It's been policy for years now
— User:Chiswick, 18:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)