Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/César Luis González
we have to |verify it. I can find three hits in gBooks that mention this fact; two of them are SPSes/vanity publishers that have wording that makes it pretty clear ''they'' sourced from ''us''. The third is an ABC-Clio published book and ''should'' be reliable https://www.google.com/books/edition/Ethnic_and_Racial_Minorities_in_the_U_S/5ufJEa6u3BcC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Cesar+Luis+Gonzalez+first&pg=PA548&printsec=frontcover, but my antennae are twitching as to ''its'' sourcing (i.e. they may have pulled from us...) and it is only a passing mention to boot. I'd really like to see this sort of fact cited multiple places, ''especially'' in "pre-Wikipedia" sources; the fact there don't seem to ''be'' any mentioning this makes me twitch even more. (I'll also note the fact isn't even actually cited in the article or even ''mentioned'' outside the lede.) If somebody can find a source that is both reliably published, pre-dates Wikipedia, and clearly states this fact, I'll happily change to a "full keep", but as it is right now there's merely the ''presumption'' of notability that can only be verified in the weakest of ways. I'm willing to AGF with my !vote here that sources, offline likely, ''exist'', and thus not being a BLP that's ''enough'', but
— User:The, 19:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)