Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blanchard Valley Conference (2nd nomination)
Now that is something I can live with.  If the article has no sourcing, has not asserted notability, then tie a piece of lead to it and kick it off the deck.  My concern is that this nomination, accidental as it was, just seemed to bundle some local conferences together and delete them, followed by the promise that others are on the way.  As at least one editor proffered, it sounded like a man with an agenda to get rid of all such articles (I didn't wholly buy that, but I can see why that came out), and another who basically said (let's delete irrelevant of of notability or , those can just be started over.  That dog don't hunt!  The problem with these bundled noms is that you run into these issues.  I would wholly approve of your suggestion, with the note that in the future, you need to be more careful about what you are bundling together
— User:LonelyBeacon, 23:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)