Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harambe
The article has gotten heavy coverage in the present, but it is too soon to say whether the death of Harambe will have lasting impact or if this will just end up being a |notnews-grade event. I think the odds of this article eventually meeting notability requirements are quite high, but this is obviously not justification for a long-standing keep. Given these facts, I would recommend closing the article as keep per  and then re-nominate it in a few weeks if notability has not been determined, or moving it into draft space and only moving it back into article space if and when notability is proven. I would prefer keeping per , since there is a lot that can be said about the gorilla that is source-able to reliable sources, and because there are a lot of people searching for Harambe (the Cincinnati Zoo page normally had a little under a hundred views per day, but exploded to several thousand a day after the indicdent, indicating that a lot of people are searching for information on the gorilla and that it would be more helpful for our readers to keep the information in article space at present https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Cincinnati_Zoo_and_Botanical_Garden
— User:Spirit, 20:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RAPID (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)