Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawna Della-Ricca
or '''Move to draft namespace''': I prodded this because there are no sources are cited in the article which show how this person satisfies  or . Moreover, a search for such sources only found social media pages and other trivial mentions which do not provide the type of |significant coverage in |independent |reliable sources needed to establish |Wikipedia notability. This person may indeed someday become notable enough to have a Wikipedia article written about her, but at this point it appears to be a case of . It was de-prodded after being mistakenly moved to the Wikipedia namespace by its creator. I have no objections to this being moved back to the draft namespace as long as the article's creator agrees to submit for review via  and not directly added to the article namespace again. I also am wondering if the creator has a  with respect to the subject matter since the same editor also created :Draft:Candyse Della-Ricca|Candyse Della-Ricca, which was subsequently moved to the draft namespace by another editor
— User:Marchjuly, 02:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:BIO||:WP:ENT||:WP:SIGCOV||:WP:IS||:WP:RS||:WP:N||:WP:TOOSOON||:WP:AFC||:WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)