Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical response to She Has a Name
I'd failed to notice this one was also AFD'ed. Broadly speaking, see my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 tour of She Has a Name|the other related AFD. Here, more specifically, the problem is |undue weight. Start by looking at the She Has a Name#Critical response|critical response section in the parent article. That's a (relatively) reasonable survey of critics' responses to the play, generally in line with what we expect from similar articles. There was nothing special about the critical response to this play, nothing that made the critical response ''itself'' notable or distinctive. Yet this critical response article spends several thousand words conveying the reviews written about it. ''No'' media subject is given this treatment elsewhere in Wikipedia; nearly every newspaper in America has some sort of film review column or section, but each film release's critical response section is not spun off into an article of its own so that each of those voices can be presented; rather, we make editorial determinations as to which are significant and representative. That's the opposite of what was done here. And make no mistake, many of these critical response voices are from extraordinarily minor local news sources. That it is possible to assemble a facially well-written article thus doesn't make it compliant with policy; rather, it makes it promotional
— User:Squeamish, 19:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)