Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Thomson (politician)
In response to the recent expansion, I'm still going to stick with my original vote (delete or redirect/merge). Per Kww above, who says it nicely, the Keep arguments here seem to want to use coverage related to her being a politician in order to satisfy GNG -- even though that coverage still doesn't satisfy . This is a roundabout way of justifying inclusion. Just as  tells us whether a film really deserves its own article ''despite'' satisfying GNG, since there are too many pre-development films that receive coverage,  tells us when someone's political coverage warrants giving them an article, since even those barely in the running receive coverage. These are higher standards for inclusion for subjects of those topics
— User:Equazcion, 07:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NOTFILM||WP:POLITICIAN (Wikipedia:Notability)