Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Canova
I guess I volunteer to do some needed cleanup. But some  arguments here & elsewhere are logically defective. They seem not to be based on anything that guideline actually says, but read things into it that are not there: In effect that candidacy (or lesser offices) works ''against'' notability. That if there is reliable source coverage that would have decisively proven notability in any other context, the fact that it was coverage related to political candidacy makes it inadequate to prove notability; That proof of notability outside of or prior to the candidacy or non-notable office is required. The guideline does not say that. In this example, although many might judge him notable for other reasons, the substantial coverage of him (& the race) in major, national sources make satisfaction of  (& ) ''as written'' completely unambiguous
— User:John, 01:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES (Wikipedia:Notability)