Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morgan James Publishing
The only substantial coverage of the company I can find is in ''Publishing Weekly'' but as a specialist industry publication, I don't consider coverage in there to be sufficient to demonstrate notability per . I've searched in Factiva to see if there has been any coverage in more mainstream sources but haven't been able to find anything but http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5tBSNc9yxu4J:www.adweek.com/galleycat/morgan-james-rick-frishman-answer-their-critics/8670+&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=ubuntu this but it's not possible to find what the original allegations were that lead to that piece
— User:Smartse, 11:10, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)