Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgeborough School
2.3&nbsp; I agree with Warden that SK2.3 is the best outcome for the encyclopedia here.&nbsp; AfD is for articles with serious problems, and given that editors are here because of a content dispute, I think that we want to discourage the use of AfD for such.&nbsp; Three editors have written down the word "delete" in bold without providing reasons to justify the removal of the edit history for this material.&nbsp; In other words, in all cases, even with the arguments made, we want to keep the redirect and the edit history for this material, so there is nothing to delete.&nbsp; As for the nominator's erge and Delete preference to bring an end to the content dispute, "The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Document License (GFDL), which Wikipedia uses to license all of its content, both have provisions requiring that the attribution history of an article be preserved."&nbsp
— User:Unscintillating, 02:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:M (Wikipedia:Mediation)