Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul
The nomination fails to recognize the general consensus of the Ron Paul editors that more of that article should be broken out into subarticles under  style, as Ron Paul is seeking FA status. The Legislation article is a direct result of that discussion, as mooted Talk:Ron Paul/Archive 6#another suggestion|here and Talk:Ron Paul/Archive 6#Excessive trivia|here. After creation I called editors' http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&diff=prev&oldid=172957308 attention to the new article Talk:Ron Paul/Archive 7#Semi-Protection|again and Talk:Ron Paul/Archive 7#family|again with no objections. The "redundancy" is merely due to the fact that the "Legislation" section of Ron Paul has not yet been converted to a short summary (3 or 4 short paragraphs) as I repeatedly Talk:Ron Paul#Length|advertised. Contrary to nominator's perception, the entire contents of the Legislation section were incorporated into the Legislation article-- the section does not contain "greater depth", the article does; especially as it comprises, into one place, some content from several other sources noted in Talk:Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul|TEN different articles on independent pieces of Paul's legislation. Therefore the article is, appropriately, the greater depth. Finally, there is NO other duplicative source where the legislation is not only described but ''discussed'' neutrally as per sources. This article comprises the best of WP's collation of source analysis of Paul's bills (as collected at Ron Paul and elsewhere). Such an article is widely sought and not available anywhere else
— User:John, 15:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SUMMARY (Wikipedia:Summary style)