Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightsource.com (2nd nomination)
You've made two of the |arguments to avoid: |other similar articles exist (if they're so similar, that's probably an argument for their deletion, too, not for keeping this one) and |it's valuable, so it belongs (but |Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion of any resource nor a collection of all useful information). PS, I'm a conservative Christian who appreciates some of the content you host, but that doesn't mean it belongs here or that this is in any way related to the material's religious nature -- it's not. The website simply doesn't meet the |notability criteria for inclusion
— User:Flex, 16:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ATA||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:USEFUL||WP:NOT||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)