Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bushra Amiwala
People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they didn't win, but nothing else here constitutes credible evidence that she's notable for other reasons. The thing that comes the closest to that in theory, "was on the cover of TIME Magazine in January 2018", falls down when you actually examine it: she was one of about 50 thumbnails in a ''collage'' cover, not the main cover subject in her own right, and she wasn't a subject of the associated article at all — literally the only time her name appears in the text at all is in the photo credits footnote. But magazine content supports notability based on how much ''substance'' it contains about the subject in the ''body'' of the ''article'', not based on whether her photo was incorporated into the cover art or not — so this is not a notability claim that makes her special. And other than that, the sourcing is a mix of |primary sources and the purely local media coverage of local election primaries that's routinely ''expected'' to ''always'' exist, so none of it assists in making her a special case of significantly greater notability than most other unsuccessful political candidates
— User:Bearcat, 16:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:No original research)