Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Beamer (2nd nomination)
You say "After the attacks", and that is, surely, the point.  He became famous posthumously because of one notable event.  Isn't that what  is all about?  It says "''If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography may be unwarranted.''".  I see nothing wrong with altering the policy of that is what consensus desires, but that is a different discussion.  Again, if consensus keeps the article, that is an important outcome. But, in that case, let us make our policies and guidelines crystal clear with no scope for a nomination such as this one
— User:Timtrent, 17:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Notability)