Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Sansom
Although he ''may'' pass  criterion 1 of the the  guideline  (Web of Science gives him an h-index of 13 with top citation counts of 96, 65, 61, 40, which strikes me as pretty good for paleotontology, if not all that exceptional), the complete lack of |independent |reliable sources (including for most of the info in the infobox) means the article fails to satisfy the erifiability policy, and as #General notes #3 says, "''It is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject''". I did search Google Scholar, News and Books for suitable such sources, but failed to locate any
— User:Qwfp, 07:51, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:V||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:independent sources||WP:reliable sources (Wikipedia:Notability)