Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuzari Principle
It's badly sourced, it does not meet our sourcing standards. It uses a self-published book for one of its few sources, plus a personal website. It uses no properly published books, no journal articles. It is basically |original research full of what some text doesn't have, 'if this then that' statements, etc. It might make a good essay but it is a bad article. The article is about a 'Kuzari Principle' yet I'm still waiting for evidence not that elements of the argument made in the article are notable, but that this 'principle' with the name it has is notable. Blogs and personal websites and self-published books aren't enough. If it's notable, why hasn't it been mentioned in journal articles, books on Jewish history or theology, etc
— User:Dougweller, 09:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)