Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Kronk Warner
The case for #C1 is weak, as Xxanthippe notes, but she is clearly a recognized expert on native American law (e.g. quoted in Washington Post), and has a plausible case for #C7 for her judicial work and #C8 for being editor-in-chief of the magazine of the Federal Bar Association (as well as serving on the bar's board of directors). Also, her edited volume has been well reviewed; that wouldn't be enough by itself but I think it adds to the overall case
— User:David, 00:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)