Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama media controversy
How is it a |POV fork or |coatrack if the article makes clear that the reports of him attending a madrassa etc. were incorrect? If there was no mention of the allegations being proven untrue, then I could see it being a POV fork or coatrack. :In this case as long as the facts are stuck to the situation is the conservative reverse of the Rathergate issue; reporting based on incomplete information that was revealed as such. There certainly was enough coverage to establish notability, including media like the NY Times discussing the poor quality of Insight's sources
— User:Anynobody, 02:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FORK||WP:COAT (Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks)