Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of congresspersons who received campaign money from the NRA
The source for the substance of the data is opensecrets.org (source 11, currently, on the article).  The other sources are all window-dressing about violence by people with guns, "top-10 NRA donor recipients," etc.  So, is opensecrets.org the new fashionable , and is Wikipedia to replicate all its data?  Seems unreasonable.  Also, : why only this page dedicated to 2016?.   reads: "''Undue weight can be given in several ways, including but not limited to depth of detail''".  I say the depth of detail points to POV-pushing, raising  issues.  As pointed out on the TP, opensecrets.org offers the same data for 2014, 2012, 2010, etc.  Insofar as these pages do not exist, it appears to be UNDUE to have this one page.  Mind you, insofar as the article is quote-"supported"-unquote by some  articles, I do think it would be fair for interested editors to build an article such as "NRA political contributions in the early 21st Century", or some such.   It's just the deep data replication from opensecrets.org that is highly questionable, UNDUE, and therefore this article should be deleted
— User:XavierItzm, 18:31, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:UNDUE||WP:WEIGHT||WP:NPOV||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)