Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinton Foundation-State Department controversy
A few editors have voted to delete by citing "."  That is not an argument, unless an explanation is provided why it violates POVFORK, which no one has done.  Certainly forks are allowed and even some POVFORKs are allowed.  No one has explained what makes this a POVFORK or an unacceptable POVFORK.  A POVFORK is an article about the same subject that gives different weight to the content.  "Clinton Foundation-State Department controversy" is not a competing version of "Clinton Foundation" that provides a different narrative, but is solely concerned with one aspect of the foundation, ''viz'', the "controversy."  There are numerous examples of similar articles.  The "Watergate Scandal" for example, while it may be a fork of the "Watergate Hotel" or the "Nixon Administration" is not a POVFORK, because it does not provide an alternative narrative of the Watergate Hotel or the Nixon Administration
— User:The, 01:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POVFORK (Wikipedia:Content forking)