Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tzahi (Zack) Weisfeld
The focus of the '''deletion decision''' should be 1) is the topic notable?  '''If not notable''' then delete, '''if "possibly notable"''' (NOT "marginally notable, but no hope of finding sources to push it "over the line", but rather "there are likely sources that haven't turned up yet that will push it over the line" or "there is still debate over the quality of the sources"), soft delete, draftify (since there is obviously ongoing improvement, with hopes of finding suitable sources), userfy (ditto), or "no consensus."  '''If it IS notable, BUT low it up and start over applies,''' then salvage the references and userfy them and delete.  Obviously, if the topic is notable and the page can be salvaged, then "keep and improve
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:B (Wikipedia:Bots)