Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pekeapoo
WP:N|Notability is verified solely though reception of significant coverage in |reliable, published sources. Passing a Google test, when not a single decent source for verification of facts exists, is not an acceptable reason to keep an article. The recent commercial viability of this hybrid does not entail firm notability. Your last arguments about orchids boil down to . The bottom line is: no reliable published sources focus significantly on this dog, which both suggests it is not notable and prevents the necessary |verification of any info in the article. If a subject cannot be sourced, then it should not have an article
— User:VanTucky, 00:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)