Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HillJack
No indication of notability.  Above commenter (Wikiqwiki) seems to badly misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia; arguments that Wikipedia is risking its own relevance or importance by not including articles on obscure people and phenomena are nothing new, and don't hold any more weight now than they did when they were first advanced.  What's needed to establish notability of this person isn't vague assertions that some people know who this person is or dire prognostications of Wikipedia's decline in relevance; it's links to coverage of this person in |reliable sources.  I looked, but couldn't find any.  (A Google News Archive search, for example, turns up absolutely no relevant hits&mdash;it does turn up 65 hits, but most are about the country music band mentioned above, and the remainder simply use "hilljack" as a vocabulary word; none are about the subject of this article.) &mdash
— User:Smeazel, 20:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)