Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Size (Unix)
Yes, as usual, Cunard was able to dredge up many trivial mentions.  However, there just isn't enough there to justify an article.  What I would want to see is something like vi, which has background, history, and a clear description of why it's notable.  I dispute that an article created from those sources would be encyclopedic and satisfy the requirements of .  Then again, we've been through this with enough AfDs by now that everyone probably already knows how I feel.  If we can't create an article that doesn't violate policy, then we shouldn't have an article
— User:NinjaRobotPirate, 16:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTMANUAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)