Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wipipedia (third nomination)
WP:WEB is not policy,  is. This is an article about a specialist encyclopeida. That the encyclopedia is (only) available on the Internet should be no disadvantage to it: were it to be publshed in printed form I am sure it would be bought, quoted, mis-used and argued about by many people, just as many such books covering BDSM or fetish are, just as are specialist encylcopedias. True, it would be nice to quote professional people's objective data on the web site (published in tried and tested media, of course) but let us be realistic about the subject matter and realise that just is not going to happen; it won't happen about the encyclopedia nor about much of the subject matter, some of which is covered in :Category:BDSM|this encylopedia. This does NOT make the topic meaningless, nor useless, nor inaccurate, nor even unverifiable to the greatest extent possible
— User:Interesdom, 10:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)