Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of birds on stamps of Bophuthatswana
On two grounds.  1) I object to these mass deletions because of the strong bias it gives to delete votes!.  One who votes! Delete merely has to generalize without any specific evidence of non-notability on any given entry.  Whereas a Keep vote! is forced to either provide generalized evidence of notability which can be typically dismissed or is forced to provide entry by entry specifics.  2) Neither the nom or those voting! delete have provided valid rationale for deletion.  Notability of lists is clearly spelled out in  a guideline that took a lot of work to achieve consensus on back in the day.  The relevant portion of  is: {{tq|Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTESAL (Wikipedia:Notability)