Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inventive Leisure
I've rewritten and expanded the article so it's hopefully all nicely sourced now. I believe it meets the GNG by being the subject of significant coverage over a number of years. In addition, looking at , it says "Examples of such sources include independent press coverage, analyst reports, and profiles by companies such as Hoover's (a commercial source)." when talking about publicly traded companies (which this was). It seems that financial reports and the like should not be excluded from determining notability. It has also got a http://www.hoovers.com/company/Inventive_Leisure_Ltd/rfrsfti-1.html profile in Hoover's, which is specifically mentioned in the guideline. The coverage available is more than simply announcements of profit and loss, and includes interviews with the founders, lots of details of takeover speculation (which I haven't included in the article but is easily found for those who care to look), analytical business coverage and so on
— User:Quantpole, 22:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)