Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticisms of sexual behavior
per nom , though I don't see it as pro-homosexual or pro-anything - it's too much of a mess.  You perhaps could have tried an RFC, don't know if there's reason to make one while there's an AfD now.  But it is very unsourced, and has not been attracting editors making the necessary changes.  Nom doesn't mention criticisms of abstinence, monogamy, reproductive, marital, and "vanilla sex" and who knows what else besides (everybody's a critic).  It would have to be all or nothing, and it's got to be cited responsibly, and that would be a practically Kinseyian undertaking.  I don't see any content worth merging into other articles, though the topics could possibly be addressed in other articles—starting from scratch (though I suspect most of them already contain criticisms
— User:Schizombie, 19:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)