Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pantheists
and the suggested move to "notable" is fine with me. It seems to me that the page passes , and that's that. We have pantheism, and there is no concern that ''that'' lacks notability, thus passing LISTN, and so the only problem would be if there was unreliability of sourcing individual persons on the list as belonging there, and that argument has not been made. The "otherstuff" arguments do not really work, and in fact we have numerous list pages about persons who were/are atheists
— User:Tryptofish, 15:28, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:Notability)