Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lucifer Principle
I say weak because I'm not completely convinced the article passes  as yet. But it will pass once cleaned up, and as has been pointed out sufficient time hasn't been given before AfD commenced. I've also thought that the book might not need its own page as such and just having a reference to it at the Bloom article might be sufficient? I also feel that the nominators rational of the article being non-encyclopedic was not valid
— User:Sting_au, 09:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)