Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Gilliard
There does seem to be some level of mainstream media attention here, and not just because of his death; some of his Photoshop work was controversial enough to be discussed in The Washington Post. (See http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/27/AR2005102702115_pf.html.) If a blogger receives a non-trivial reference in a major newspaper of record, that is enough notability in my opinion. There aren't all that many bloggers who meet that standard, and all of them who do should have articles, since  paper
— [[User talk:Crotalus horridus|***&nbsp;Crotalus&nbsp;***]], 14:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)