Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MS-10 Pezun Dowadge
per . In the case of Fictional items,  would supercede the cited policies, as it makes no sense otherwise (why have a seperate specific policy for a fictional items if it's outranked by a more general policy?). Also, assertion that the article isn't written in a "real-world perspective" (while this this seems completely subjective and a questionalble assertion to me), even if true, isn't grouds for deletion, as it's a simple matter to re-write information from a different perspective. If there's a problem with having fictional material on Wikipedia, nominator should propose changes to policy instead of trying to backdoor his way through
— User:Xenon, 22:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:FICT||WP:FICT (Wikipedia:Notability)