Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahnome McEwan
Nothing here hands him an automatic notability freebie just because he exists, but the referencing is not cutting it for getting him over . People get over a Wikipedia inclusion criterion by being the ''subject'' of coverage in |reliable sources, not by being the interview guest who's speaking about something other than himself or by |self-publishing his own web presence or by getting profiled on a bank's corporate |blog — so the Rob Carrick article in ''The Globe and Mail'' is the only source here that even ''starts'' to build a case for notability, but ''one'' viable source doesn't ''finish'' the case for notability all by itself if it isn't verifying anything that would constitute an "inherent" notability claim (such as winning the Governor General's Award for English-language non-fiction ''for'' his book.) No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when there's a stronger basis for notability and better sourcing for it, but Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which he's entitled to have an article just because he exists
— User:Bearcat, 18:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:BLOGS (Wikipedia:Notability)