Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Broch
There's no significant coverage by reliable, independent sources. Arguing that he's an ace, and we have articles about other aces, is a classic example of . Being an ace doesn't mean the subject is notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia article. There's literally nothing else on this page except that he was a "prolific signer" and as K.e.coffman said, that's really stretching it
— User:CrispyGlover, 18:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)