Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Folx (term)
As Crossroads suggests, some of the cited sources seem to be Use–mention distinction|use rather than analysis of the word ''qua'' word. But leaving those aside, there are still about half a dozen appropriate scholarly sources, satisfying , at least to my satisfaction. Completed dissertations, at least at the doctoral level, can be used as reliable sources when supported by other sources. Being behind a paywall or not available online has no bearing on sourcing. While the article may include original research or other problems, eletion is not cleanup. NB: I removed the blog that is #12 in nom's list above, and replaced it with a scholarly article by the professor in question. Like the blog, it also refers to the ''Boston Globe'' piece, but also includes much more analysis of the general issue
— User:Cnilep, 05:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:D (Wikipedia:Notability)