Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnes (1904)
usually with an article like this it would be a case of , but this was covered across the nation:- ''The Sydney Morning Herald'' (Sydney) - https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/14732074?searchTerm=agnes%20%22sydney%20harbour%22%20collision&searchLimits= "Sydney Harbour Traffic", ''The Albury Banner and Wodonga Express'' (Albury) - https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/100686435?searchTerm=agnes%20%22sydney%20harbour%22%20collision&searchLimits= "Sydney Harbour Collision.", ''The Argus (Melbourne)|The Argus'' (Melbourne) - https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/10039101?searchTerm=agnes%20%22sydney%20harbour%22%20collision&searchLimits= "Sydney Harbour Collision", ''Western Mail (Western Australia)|Western Mail'' (Perth|Perth (Western Australia)) - https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/37387315?searchTerm=agnes%20%22sydney%20harbour%22%20collision&searchLimits= "Collision in Sydney Harbour", ''The Courier-Mail|The Brisbane Courier'' (Brisbane) - https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/19432349?searchTerm=agnes%20%22sydney%20harbour%22%20collision&searchLimits= "Collision in Sydney Harbour", (even so, editors may call this |routine coverage but then, there's just no pleasing some people:)), however, with the additional sources mentioned by {{u|Aoziwe}} above that it was reported on across the ditch (international), and in 2017 (lasting), this does raise it above the usual news reporting so is a '''Keep''' from me
— User:Coolabahapple, 04:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)