Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic: The Gathering deck types (3rd nomination)
I haven't looked at every single source in the article, but the majority seem to be how-to guides. Just because a site that is reliable covers the topic of deck composition does not mean that they are establishing notability for the topic as a whole. Using the topic of video games, GameSpot and other such sites will have various gameplay guides. That's a reliable site, but that would not mean an article on a game's gameplay would have notability established due to that. That is explicit game guide material and nothing shows the potential to develop the article as a whole in such a way that such restructuring is possible. The idea that it somehow only applies to video games is silly. Games are games, guides are guides, and this is a game guide. It's basically an issue of , and everything shows that Magic: The Gathering#Deck construction has a decent overview of the topic
— User:TTN, 20:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEIGHT (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)