Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railway station layout
I don't think  or  really apply here; anyway, the existence of an essay is no proof of its validity in a deletion argument. My !vote is based on the nom's application of . If any article were to attempt to catalogue this information, it would have to take an entirely different approach of summarising rather than randomly listing. In my view, that's deleting without prejudice to readdressing the subject, though you could call it TNT if you were that way inclined
— User:Triptothecottage, 09:32, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SOFIXIT||WP:TNT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Be bold)