Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kresimir Chris Kunej (2nd nomination)
Nominator himself commented on how much the article is now improved. Per previous discussions, article clearly passes  1, 4 and 7 (let me know if someone needs more details on this claim). Nominator states "''Finally, the claims that notability is achieved because an article of his was used in a seminar in Germany, and that he translated a textbook that's in use, those claims are overblown and do not a notable scholar make."'', but I think he is wrong, those claims exactly contribute to notability in a huge way if one reads the above listed  policies. Regardless, the paragraph "Resulting lasting impact in the field of Croatian translation" shows notability per nybio in a very obvious way. This is not a standard BLP, it is well researched, well sourced and academically relevant. There is a point at which "no notability" accusations become unreasonable, I hope we do not reach it. Thanks
— User:Turqoise127, 15:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:A (Wikipedia:Notability)