Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abella Anderson (5th nomination)
Fails  and the . Virtually no independent sourcing, negligible independent reliable sourcing. There's never been a credible argument that the awards claimed by the subject met the "well-known and significant" standard, just a lot of handwaving and attempts to bootstrap claims of notability that were ultimately rooted only in promotional efforts
— User:Hullaballoo, 14:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)