Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture (second nomination)
a polite request to not close this per  until everyone has had a chance to contribute to the discussion.  says: ''"If properly sourced and consistent with policies and guidelines, popular culture articles can attain quality and be a quality part of a topic."'' I intend to edit the article to provide the necessary sources (secondary source talking about the cultural phenomenom, not primary sources to examples of the phenomenon), and to bring the article in line with policies and guidelines. This will hopefully demonstrate what might be possible. This will likely invalidate most of the delete votes above and below, which is unfortunate, but I think editing an article to improve it is better than deletion. fD says: ''"If you wish for an article to be kept, you can improve the article to address the reasons for deletion given in the nomination. You can search out references, and diffuse the deletion arguments given using policy, guidelines, and examples from our good and featured articles. If the reasons given in the nomination are addressed by editing, the nomination should be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an admin."'' Possibly there will be insufficient content once the editing has finished, in which case a merge of what remains may be the best solution. I intend to start the editing tomorrow, and invite those participating in the debate to contribute. Thanks
— User:Carcharoth, 09:23, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SNOW||WP:IPC||WP:A (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)