Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy Catalyzer (2nd nomination)
and not merge.  First of all, the point of  is about the article tone itself or over emphasizing some trivial little detail that is off topic.  I don't even remotely see how calling an entire topic undue weight to Wikipedia and therefore justifies its deletion.  This is a flat out inappropriate reason to justify deletion at all, other than to perhaps suggest the article itself needs to be nuked and rewritten based up on actual sources.  That is sort of the point of an article talk page, of which this has been amply worked on.  As for the merger request, I suggest that this topic has independent notability and does involve more than one person, even though Andrea Rossi is prominent in telling of this story.  Otherwise, this AfD is a rehash of all of the arguments raise in the previous AfD where notability was clearly established.... IMHO the only real argument to even be worth discussing as grounds for deletion.  Even the merger discussion was raised in the previous AfD and rejected
— User:Robert, 15:34, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)