Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Berliner
I have just noticed that the original reporter (@agtx) has removed some content from the wiki article and then nominate it for deletion; even if the removal was legit (it seems so by  policies), this type of behaviour is inappropriate as it makes the article look much weaker than it was before, thus erroneously influencing the users and consequently affecting the decisions made about the AfD. The part removed was essentially a list of secondary sources from respected mainstream publications (by  policies).  For now, I assume good faith about the reporter and I formally ask a ''procedural delay'' to properly investigate those sources and then have someone "fluent in law" (I'm not) review the entire article. Sorry for the pedantry
— User:Toffanin, 12:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:C||WP:V (Wikipedia:Copyrights)