Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination)
This is a toughie, because what would be  in one part of the world might be pretty mainstream in another.  If this were Americopedia, I'd be inclined to ''Delete'' because the apartheid analogy is pretty fringy where I live.  However, it appears to me -- and I vote "weak" because I could be wrong here -- that the apartheid analogy is relatively mainstream in some parts of the world.  Care should be taken, though, to consolidate where appropriate so that we don't have pov forks and such.  For instance, this may be redundant with Israel and the apartheid analogy.  (On a side note, any allegations of sing on the part of ChrisO are ludicrous.  He is informing potentially interested parties of thjs debate ''regardless'' of their previous opinions -- which, having done similar things in the past, I can say is a tedious, thankless, and yet very valuable service.  Shame on the accusers, and kudos to ChrisO for getting more participation
— User:Jaysweet, 20:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:CANVAS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)