Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Jedi Purge (4th nomination)
the topic fails to establish its notability in that there is no significant coverage from reliable and independent secondary sources, per . One-sentence and passing mentions don't count, per #cite_note-1, and those found over the course of the discussion fall in the same category as they don't allow the article to go beyond a plot summary. Per , the emphasis of an article about fiction must be its reception and significance, ''not'' the plot summary which is to be "concise". The inescapable truth of Great Jedi Purge is that it is a massive plot dump frighteningly devoid of out-of-universe content, and the two or three scattered out-of-universe sentences just can't improve or save the article on their own. In order not to violate , plot summary would have to be trimmed down almost to nothing so as to seem "concise" next to the abysmally small amount of discussion on "reception and significance"...that would mean reducing the article down to 5 or 6 sentences. I think some contributors need to open their eyes on the fact that without significant secondary sources there is nothing to be fixed, and the discussion utterly ''failed'' to provide any (most of the sources provided https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Great_Jedi_Purge&diff=576250356&oldid=575181912 in this edit don't have even trivial mentions of the purge), and that Wikipedia doesn't take "so be it" for an answer. One way or an other, "Great Jedi Purge" doesn't deserve a stand-alone article (there could be a merge to Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
— User:Folken, 19:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NOTPLOT||WP:NOTPLOT (Wikipedia:Notability)