Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Delaney
Delusional" seems a bit harsh and not in keeping with our policies about |civility and  |assuming good faith.  I would have supported deletion when this originally autobiographical article was first created nearly three years ago.  But what has happened since then? Notability, that's what.  In depth coverage in the Los Angeles Times.  An interview on the CBS Evening News.  Coverage in the New York Daily News and USA Weekend (circulation 22.6 million).  Writeups in Hollywood trade publications like the Hollywood Reporter and Tubefilter, which is one of the most professional sites covering web media.  Just what do terms like "delusional" and "wannabe" mean in this context
— User:Cullen328, 05:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CIVILITY||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Civility)