Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemesysco
I'm puzzled by the suggestion that there are not enough sources to meet the notability threshold, especially when this relatively short article already has 11 independent sources cited. The very first one, for instance, is an academic journal article, and its treatment of Nemesysco can hardly be considered "passing." The article is an analysis of the reliability of Nemesysco products, and it uses the word "Nemesysco" 15 times. The article from ''Science'' also checks all the boxes for the  notability guidelines. I'd be disinclined to change my vote unless someone can explain to me what is wrong with those two sources, at the very least
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)