Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of GO Transit stations
per above commenters. The difference between this and the Metrolink or London Underground lists isn't that GO Transit is inherently less valid in principle; it's that the Metrolink and London Underground lists both contain ''substantive'' content ''beyond'' just listing the stations' names — they both contain actual substantive ''introductions'' that go well ''beyond'' just restating the page title; they both contain system maps and photographs; they both list the stations in expanded tables that also include columns for supplementary details such as intermodal connections, opening dates and ridership statistics; they both contain |reliable source ''references'' to ''support'' the content. I'd be perfectly okay with keeping this ''if'' it could be |Heymanned up to the ''quality'' standard displayed by those lists — but in ''this'' form it's not even close to substantive or keepable
— User:Bearcat, 15:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:HEY (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)