Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collaborative information seeking
per  - ''What?'' Academic peer-reviewed research publications are not considered self-published, they're the |most reliable of all reliable sources. The guidelines against spam should not be used to delete coverage of scientific research, they're fundamentally different things. These two articles contain a respectable collection of references from different authors with a high count of citations. If there's a conflict of interest, the community's responsibility is to review and assess the credibility of each individual claim, not to sweep everything under the carpet. The reasons why this content may be non-neutral have not even been addressed at the article's talk page; deletion should be a last resort if it was impossible to |fix the problems, which seems unlikely
— User:Diego, 08:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SOURCE||WP:IMPERFECT (Wikipedia:Notability)