Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agastopia
This was previously proposed for speedy deletion on  grounds, and it may still satisfy that criterion, the two (dodgy) sources notwithstanding. That said, if there were more demonstrable substance to this, I'd actually want to keep it as a curio, but given that the article consists only of a dictionary definition plus a couple of unsupported claims (and on a quick search I couldn't find anything to support it either), there's nothing there to keep, once you've pared it down; hence fails . Draftifying it seems pretty pointless, too, seeing as it's taken 6+ years to get this far
— User:DoubleGrazing, 18:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:A11||WP:NAD (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)