Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Angeli
There are more than enough in-depth articles about him to satisfy . Importantly, these profiles are not mostly  coverage, but are contextualizing his involvement in that event by describing his position as one of the most consistently prominent members of a major extremist social movement. In addition to the several independent in-depth profiles in reliable sources that are already cited in the article, it is extremely easy to find more in-depth sources in various RS. Here are just a few arbitrary ones, in https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/jake-angeli-qanon-shaman-stormed-capitol-b1784091.html The Guardian, https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-is-qanon-what-we-know-about-the-conspiracy-theory-11597694801 the Wall Street Journal, and https://www.bbc.com/news/55572805 the BBC. He is mentioned by name in the first two headlines, and the articles focus substantially on him, while the latter story calls him "well-known", so, notable beyond this one event. And more examples can be found by searching his name. Further backing up the objection to a 1E deletion, we can indeed find non-trivial news coverage of him (if not necessarily particularly in-depth coverage) from before yesterday, such as mentions and photos in https://www.dailyherald.com/article/20201107/news/311079954 the Daily Herald, https://www.sj-r.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/07/its-not-over-trump-supporters-flock-to-state-capitols-after-biden-victory-is-announced/43015609/ the State Journal-Register, and https://www.azcentral.com/in-depth/news/local/arizona-investigations/2020/10/01/how-arizona-patriots-have-built-community-around-conspiracy-theories/3486382001/ AZCentral. This is more than enough for GNG, and the fact that they are contextualizing his participation in this one event in the context of broader notoriety should allay any 1E concerns
— User:Astrophobe, 20:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:1E (Wikipedia:Notability)