Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One hour translation
Reference 1 is a  | blog (which is not generally authoritative) also also appears to be  | promotional. Reference 2 is a patent application which does not indicate notability (and may never issue as a patent). Reference 3 briefly mentions the subject as used by another service.  Reference 4 is a disguised press release and discusses a proposed launch without any indication that such ever occurred or that it is notable.  Reference 5 is a blog in which the subject is mentioned once in a list of others.  In Reference 6, the subject is mentioned once - although this is probably the only authoritative source referenced.  Perhaps if the article and references are greatly improved, I might think differently but at present this seems  | self-promotional
— User:Rpclod, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UGC||WP:QUESTIONABLE||WP:PROMOTE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)