Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condosity
I've address both long-standing flags for no sources and no links (orphan). I've also managed to find and  insert quite a range of independent  to show this term is in use across a number of scientific research fields. I'd never heard of it before, but that's no reason for deletion. Nor would  apply any more, as this article has now  been expanded sufficiently to being more than a mere definition. Note to nom: do remember to sign your AfDs in future, please. Regards
— User:Nick, 02:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOTDICT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)