Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Schlafly (5th nomination)
In response to the  reference, I guess I should've included my later comment about being contraversial as point 5. I feel that it is fair to point out that Other Crap Exists in this case - because other crap which is a lot less contraversial passes, and this doesn't. I feel like a higher standard of notability is being called for, due to the controversy. And that isn't a notability guildline
— User:SmokingNewton, 02:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)