Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Party of Australia (founded 2014)
I didn't !vote in the earlier discussion but I remember having a quick look at the article, and I would definitely have gone for deletion at that stage. The party certainly wouldn't pass any notability guidelines specific to political parties (no registration and no elections contested), but I think https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Country_Party_of_Australia_%28founded_2014%29&diff=648090977&oldid=648086940 BDD's work in expanding the article pushes it over the line when it comes to the GNG. Two non-trivial articles from the ABC, three of the same from ''The Land'', and one each from ''Queensland Country Life'' and ''Farm Weekly'' is a lot more than many AEC-registered parties, and definitely |significant coverage in my book. The ABC is definitely an , and I'd strongly argue the same of the three rural publications. I'm not a regular reader of them by any means, but I have come across them on several occasions (for Wikipedia and non-Wikipedia purposes), and I would suggest their quality meets or even exceeds the standards of the capital city dailies – they of course don't have the readership level, but they're on a completely different level to the free community rags you get in the metro area
— [[User talk:IgnorantArmies|IgnorantArmies]] [[User talk:IgnorantArmies|(talk)]]''', 11:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)