Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Japanese sex terms
How on God's green earth can you claim this is encyclopedic''??! It does NOT meet . It is NOT VERIFIABLE in that there are no SOURCES. Bishōjo has no sources. Futanari is not sourced. Image club is just totally made up. I would '''strongly''' suggest that the people voting keep THINK about what they are voting to keep. There are some terms in the list that are legit, but the majority of list is an unsourced list of mostly unsourced terms that , if they belong ANYWHERE, belong on the Japanese Wikipedia. Please also look up in the dictionary the definition of ''encyclopedia''. Wikipedia is not toilet paper
— User:Elaragirl, 15:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP: NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)