Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxonomy (general)
with all due respect, the original rationale for deletion amounts to a fussy, pedantic (mis-)use of .  '''''this article is USEFUL'''''; that matters. it's a kind of article-length disambiguation page, & that's ''NOT A BAD THING''.  as for the arguement about taxonomy = classification so merge & be done, i'd suggest that i) it is still useful to have the various "taxonomies" disambiguated, & ii) the useage of "taxonomy" has specificities within the larger topic of "classification"; in that the 2 words are not always & exactly interchangeable in english use. how we should handle that, i do not know. in deciding to operate wiktionary as a completely separate wikiproject, we left certain questions of how to handle "the science of words" in a messy limbo
— User:Lx, 00:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)