Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newtonian time in economics
While possibly a |fringe theory, it appears to be a |notable one to judge from these Google http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Newtonian+time%22+economics+O%27Driscoll+Rizzo Scholar and http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Newtonian+time%22+economics+O%27Driscoll+Rizzo Books searches, so rather than deleting, it needs |improving to include criticisms of the idea or the terminology (e.g. from the 'strongly negative' review of the book in ''The Review of Austrian Economics'' {{doi|10.1007/BF01539340}}: "''It would have been better, I think, to refer to the static uses of time as "neoclassical time" rather than "Newtonian time;' for the latter suggests that more is at stake than the misuse of time in economic analysis. But that is a quibble. The last subsection of their discussion of Newtonian time, "The Measurement of Time" (pp. 58-59), is dressed up in mathematical garb and is very difficult to understand;''" (p195)). Personally I have serious doubts about including the article in Template:Time topics|the 'Time topics' navbox though, especially in its present state
— User:Qwfp, 19:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:fringe||WP:notable (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)