Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitt Romney Cranbrook incident
but give the article lots of TLC to ensure it remains within the bounds of policy. Some of the delete comments above come across as knee-jerk reactions: that a topic is also a recent news story is a necessary condition for meeting  but not a sufficient one. The same can be said about objections based on the idea that this is an attack page: it doesn't read that way to me, just an attempt to document a potentially inclusion-worthy topic. If this story completely goes away within a week, month or whatever, there's nothing to stop it being AfD'd again, but for now, the amount of coverage its getting suggests that that stands a good chance of not happening, so let's hold on and see how things develop. I think a rename would be a good idea: I'd like to offer up "alleged bullying of John Lauber" as something that might be more neutral? If this is deleted, then second preference would be for this content to be d but condensed into a section of that name in the Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012 article
— User:SP, 16:50, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)