Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doncaster North services
Clearly fails the ; what we're dealing with here is (ultimately) a run-of-the-mill shopping center. The claim in  about services clearly isn't good law given recent contrary AfDs and speedy deletions. It's meant to be descriptive, it doesn't carry the weight of policy, and it's inaccurate to boot. The claims about  must fail as well; if it applied to services where the population is 100% transient then ''every'' major (or minor) commercial complex would be presumptively notable, and this is not so.  is obviously the applicable guideline inasmuch as this is a complex of buildings, but that section requires significant coverage in line with the GNG, and none is on offer here
— User:Mackensen, 11:09, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ROADOUTCOMES||WP:GEOLAND||WP:GEOFEAT (Wikipedia:Notability)