Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Relations Journal
The article has scant information and almost certainly can never be expanded. It is unlikely that sources will be identified which critique this journal, as even very popular journals often have no coverage in third-party sources. As the nominator said, the organization behind the journal is much more interesting than the journal itself. However, I routinely argue that journals should have their own articles because such journals are the source of Wikipedia itself and Wikipedia is made better when people are prompted to improve articles about the journals from which it came. I say this even about scholarly academic and professional journals which do not meet  if they seem to be popular in their field of expertise, as this one does. At a minimum, this should be a redirect with the categories left intact so that it can appear in lists of journals
— User:Bluerasberry, 16:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)