Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapman's Problem
Definitely interesting, very original, and I'd be interested in finding out more directly from the article creator.  However, it's still a delete-- one of the cardinal rules here is  "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought."  Our purpose is very ''un''original, preserving things that have already been published and attained such a degree of notability that people already know of them.  I've not heard of this before, so I won't dispute that it's originated with the creator or with Chapman; ironically, if someone else already discovered this, it would be a keeper.  This is one of the most original of our original research  contributions, but still original research.  Sorry
— User:Mandsford, 02:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)