Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GridPP
I was initially completely perplexed by this nomination, wondering why the various scientific papers were being ignored. However, I see otability, in requiring independent sources for notability, says ' "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent' and perhaps the nominator is regarding the co-authors of the scientific papers as being the "producers", and they may be affiliated with the topic. However, I think the guideline is trying to say that the journals' editors and publishers must not have an affiliation. Whatever, if the guidelines suggest this sort of topic is not notable, the guidelines are inappropriate in this case, and I choose not to accept their guidance
— User:Thincat, 21:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)