Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (gerontologist)
I guess it really doesn't make that much of a difference to me whether this article stays or goes, but I think one of the biggest problems that people seem to be having (including myself) is that it was written by the subject itself.  is bad and all that. I think the people who are voting for keep should be prepared to completely rewrite the article - blank the page and recreate it themselves. As linked to in , everything must be verifiable and no original research is allowed and, from looking at the article, I can see where there are arguably violations to that. Anyhow, if this does stay, people who voted keep should keep it up and people who voted delete should make sure that, at the very least, it satisfies verifiability and . Voting comes with a responsibility
— User:Canadian, 16:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AUTO||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Autobiography)