Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Irving Andrews
Being a full professor explicitly does not satisfy . Nor does publishing articles and books in itself make someone notable. Having said so, I realize that it might be difficult to find online sources on somebody who worked almost a century ago. Google is bound to be useless here. So I find myself in disagreement with both the nom and Cirt... Guess that comes down to a '''neutral''' then... :-) One note to the nom, though: if you performed an "(admittedly cursory) search", you should (re-)read 
— User:Randykitty, 19:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)