Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Scherban
per .  As Djsasso says, this is the type of case that the specific notability guideline is supposed to simplify by avoiding the needs identify specific instances of coverage meeting GNG where there is consensus that the subject meets criteria that would cause it to meet GNG.  There is also an argument above to ignore the primary source that he meets NCOLLATH.  This is a misreading - all we need in this case is a reliable source and primary sources can be reliable.  But regardless I did find a reliable secondary source from the https://www.newspapers.com/clip/36105766/edm_journal_scherban/ Edmonton Journal
— User:Rlendog, 19:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NCOLLATH (Wikipedia:Notability)