Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wealthiest historical figures (2nd nomination)
The subject is probably notable, and the article is sourced. I appreciate the definite ''substantial'' concerns over  and , but those are better met through a big watchlist (has 48 right now) contingent, vigorous debate on page, and '''most importantly''' a clear explanation of the ranking criteria. If it comes out that the page is completely misrepresenting those sources provided, I'd change my vote, but as it is now I think this is a keep, but I wouldn't suffer any suggestions that the nominator was wrong in bringing it here
— User:Shadowjams, 07:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:No original research)