Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Street Co-op
1) We've heard from participants here who have found sources, yet there is no apparent effort to have complied with . Where is the analysis of potential sources and alternatives to improve the article? Simply asserting that "Your assessment of the sources is false", without any evidence of an appropriate good-faith effort to find sources,  accomplishes nothing. 2) The header for this AfD -- and every other one in Wikipedia -- states that the nominator must '''"... consider alternatives to deletion. If you think the article could be a disambiguation page, redirected or merged to another article, then consider recommending "Disambiguation", "Redirect" or "Merge" instead of deletion. Similarly, if another editor has proposed an alternative to deletion but you think the article should be deleted instead, please elaborate why."''' Why has the nominator not considered a merge / redirect
— User:Alansohn, 20:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)