Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uttarakhand Handloom and Handicraft Development Council
controls here. We need |significant coverage in multiple |independent, |reliable |secondary sources. I agree that , I also note the question is one of what sources exist, |not which ones are found in the article. However of the references provided https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/retail/snapdeal-to-market-uttarakhands-handicraft-handloom-products/articleshow/49417484.cmshttps://www.dailypioneer.com/2020/state-editions/handloom-and-handicrafts-exhibition-begins-at-doon-haat.html do not satisfy the requirement for . The two additional references in google news beyond those provided above, also have this issue. The broader google search finds only a small amount of additional coverage of a handful of marketing deals. In sum English language searches do not uncover anything that satisfies . At a deeper level, content must be neutral and verifiable, the only neutral and verifiable things that can be said are that this organization exists and has struck a few deals, but Wikipedia is |not a directory. Would be willing to strike and reconsider if non-English sources show that  is in fact met
— User:2604, 17:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:RS||WP:SECONDARY||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP||WP:NEXIST||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NORG (Wikipedia:Notability)