Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Ryder Cup photograph
all of the "ample coverage" says essentially the same thing.  So how does it justify an ''entire article'' on the topic?  Per my !vote above, it seems like  weight to me.  I would like to see some discussion on this aspect of the topic; why does this meme warrant an entire article instead of a bullet point paragraph in the List of Internet phenomena article
— User:Andrwsc, 16:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)