Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twinnie Lee Moore
I may ultimately agree that the article should be deleted, but in my opinion none of the arguments the nominator presents are reasons to delete an article. They are reasons to be ''suspicious'' about a given article, but not reasons to actually delete. Perhaps I'm splitting hairs, but I don't think casting aspersions on the article's creator and/or subsequent contributors represents a compelling reason to delete, in most cases. Regardless, I think there is cause to be concerned with the subject's |notability. I would be unhesitant about expressing a Delete !vote here, but http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/leisure/theatre/8301610.Twinnie_Lee_Moore_lands_West_End_role/ this is certainly non-trivial coverage of the subject. I am less certain about the reliability of the source, however, and the article itself is a puff piece with very weak sourcing as-is
— User:Ginsengbomb, 05:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)