Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Police
Added three refs and expanded it. Another depressing AfD, with the occasional injection of asinine comments.  Apart from spotting that the article at present was unsourced, did the nom do any work whatsoever to check if it could be sourceable, per  and ? Never been there, and no plans of going, but Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa, and the eighth most populous country in the world, with a huge entertainment industry. Nigeria is infamous for its Gini coefficient and not exactly famous for widespread Internet access.  They don't speak English you know, so the odds of finding a sizeable Google footprint in English to satisfy  are of course slim, and really, really ought to be considered in the deletion rationale, in particular when, as in this case, there is no problem with |verifiability.  This type of nom lends itself to  problems. The !votes above, that it should be deleted for BLP reasons, for being a one-sentence stub, and "come-on" are downright ludicrous.  Laurels to Schmidt for defending the Wiki-spirit, where do you find the energy
— User:Power, 12:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:FILM||WP:V||WP:BIAS (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)