Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge
I'll start with what I think is most important here, that is, |notability is not inherited. This is an article about an unborn child, it's not an arguable position to say that the non-person (as yet) is notable. As it is, there isn't a guideline for dealing with the notability of people who are considered royalty, and, there is even less of that for a person who hasn't been born yet. In that regard I have to go with the most basic criteria available; {{tq|People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject}}. In this case, the subject of the article comprehensively fails all of the above. The person has not received any coverage independent of it's parents, the Queen, or any other persons, and, the pregnancy itself is the subject of the sources and not the child. Furthermore, , exists for the very reason this article does. This entire article is stitched together by minor press releases. I mean for god's sake; a) {{tq|Early media speculations were that the baby will be born at St Mary's Hospital, London, were the couple's other two children were born
— User:Mr, 01:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)