Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of military disasters (4th nomination)
The list as it stands is clearly riginal research. Inclusion on the list is ostensibly based on the definition by McNab outlined in the : {{tq|chronic mission failure (the key factor), successful enemy action, and (less significant) total degeneration of a force's command and control structure}}. That doesn't meet  by a long shot, because those criteria are not {{tq|unambiguous, objective, and supported by |reliable sources}}—there's room for interpretation/debate, which necessitates applying R to determine whether any particular entry qualifies. It's also a bit dubious if this singular definition reflects the consensus among scholars about what makes something a military disaster (if such a consensus even exists); having a definition which multiple sources agree on would be preferable. If, on the other hand, inclusion is ''not'' based McNab's definition, that's even worse from an R perspective since inclusion is not in such a case based on ''any'' inclusion criteria
— User:TompaDompa, 19:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:O||WP:LEAD||WP:LISTCRITERIA||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Orphan)