Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Architects' data
According to , "suggested bases for a finding of notability for an academic or technical book include whether the book is published by an academic press, how widely the book is cited by other academic publications or in the media, how influential the book is considered to be in its specialty area, or adjunct disciplines, and whether it is taught or required reading in a number of reputable educational institutions." Cesar Pelli calls this book "invaluable" and The Architects' Journal calls the book "an invaluable reference book" (http://www.amazon.com/Architects-Data-Ernst-Neufert/dp/0258965096 see Amazon). Numerous educational institutions list the book as required reading/reference (http://academics.triton.edu/faculty/fheitzman/library.html 1, http://cat2.mit.edu/4.207/2011s/textbook.html 2, http://fac-web.spsu.edu/library/Subjects/architecture_architects/standards_and_codes.html 3, http://www-personal.umich.edu/~crumich/A322W2011/322_W12_syllabus.pdf 4). It seems this book is influential within the field of architecture and thus it must be kept per 's guidelines for academic or technical books
— User:Sailing, 05:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NBOOK||WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)