Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DVD Verdict (2nd nomination)
as a suitable and improvable stub/start class article per analysis and sources brought forward by {{u|23W|User:23W}} showing the nom's rationale is flawed, and the facts shared in the last such deletion attempt of five years ago: '''1) '''   DVD Verdict is one of the top DVD review websites much like DVD Talk.  Major movie studios work with DVD Verdict to get press coverage and reviews of their new releases.  DVD Verdict is also counted as a reliable source for countless Wikipedia film related articles. '''2)'''  SCTV includes their reviews of them on their website,http://www.sctvguide.ca/episodes/sctvdvd.htm, they are listed besides others such as Roger Ebert, Salon.com, etc. as reviewers,http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0217505/externalreviews and Rotten Tomatoes considers them a suitable critic resource.http://www.rottentomatoes.com/critics/sources.php '''3)''' 9 sources should be sufficient to keep it; the minimum number required is 2.  And aside from a wish to have it gone, no proper  #REASON|deletion argument has been made.  User:23W |found the coverage the nom did not, and this is suitable for coverage herein under  and 
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 13:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DEL||WP:BEFORE||WP:USEBYOTHERS||WP:RSOPINION (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)