Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RFP360
The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. scope_creep above has explained why Forbes sites is not regarded as meeting  and I will add by saying that part of the website has no editorial oversight and falls into the same category as a blog, which is why is fails as a reliable source. Topic fails GNG/
— User:HighKing, 11:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:RS||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)