Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Airlines Flight 380
Would you not agree that your comment has basically degenerated (once again) to nothing more than ? In fact, it fits the bill exactly: ''We do not have an article on , so we should not have an article on this.'' Notability is not established by what you define as a workhorse of the aviation industry. It is established by the extent of coverage via third-party sources, which has been clearly demonstrated as meeting the requirements as per above, irregardless of the outcome of the plane's performance in years ahead. If an article has PR-spammy-advertorial content, than initiate an attempt to clean it up (unless you are able to do it yourself). You are once again reminded not to abuse the AfD process
— User:Huaiwei, 06:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)