Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Ramaraaja
per nom, with suggestion to re-introduce when notability is proven. In cleaning the article and discussing the issues both here and at the talk page, C.Fred has been a model of patience. The issue has been explained clearly for several days; a series of indignant, patronizing, and bold-face comments supporting the article are not a substitute for objective reliable sources, per . This is not the place to offer lessons in spiritual history, but to supply third-party sources which will support the importance of this person. Shouting at other contributors won't do, and ought to gain the attention of administrators. Conflict of interest is a major concern here. Contributions to this page feature several single purpose accounts--one desires to assume good faith, but given tone and timing, there is a possibility that one editor is using several accounts to forward their point of view. My disclosure: I proposed the article for speedy deletion, and contributed to the article's talk page under a different IP. Special:Contributions/99.168.82.38|99.168.82.38
— [[User talk:99.168.82.38|talk]]), 23:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RELIABLE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)