Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archive.is (2nd nomination)
Quoting my argument from Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 June 1|the deletion review: The ''CNET Japan'' and ''Ferra.ru'' articles only seem to be providing basic descriptions of the service, which I don't think meets the "significant coverage" requirement of GNG; the ''PLOS ONE'' article only has incidental coverage anyway, and I can't access the ''IJoDL'' article, but based on OP's summary I'm assuming that is also only incidental coverage. That only leaves the ''Vice'' article as clearly providing significant coverage. Thus it doesn't meet |GNG and I don't see any other notability guideline that it does meet
— User:me_and, 13:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)