Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama's visit to India
All of the justifications I have seen thus far as to why this is not a routine are not convincing. This was the ''sixth'' visit by a U.S. president to India? So what? The media likes to speculate about the implications of routine trips. Many of the same things were said about Barack Obama's 2010 visit to China, which was arguably more significant, but the article was still OBAMA'S VISIT TO CHINA|redirected to Sino-American relations. For those arguing that the United States' support for India's UNSC bid is significant (despite its support for many other countries' bids, and the fact that it's not likely to lead anywhere), that goes into the UNSC reform article. All significant trade deals go in the economy articles, all key developments go into the India-United States article, one paragraph at most. The rest is |news
— User:Quigley, 21:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)