Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traktor (2nd nomination)
If there's a consensus that the subject is indeed notable, reliable sources are easily found, and the article could be improved by editing - if only someone would make the effort - then it shouldn't be removed from the main article space, no matter how "terrible" it is currently, or how long it's been that way. Except for extreme cases of spam or copyright infringement, if the existing content is hopelessly irredeemable, then at most it should be |stubbed. But that's a content discussion for the article's talk page, not AfD. "Needs improvement" isn't grounds for deletion. There's Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline#View_two:_Don.27t_rush_to_delete_articles|no deadline for improvement, and one shouldn't be artificially imposed through an AfD nomination
— User:IamNotU, 18:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:STUBIFY (Wikipedia:Stub)