Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations (2nd nomination)
I made a research on the matter and reviewed the positions of each party. I'm not an expert on the subject but I have some knowledge on how things work in the field of theoretical physics. It's a strange and confusing area, as many wikipedians have probably found out by now... I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia policy too. There is something very important in  that makes the difference here, I cite: "...it has received '''significant''' coverage in...". In this context, it means that mere mentions or cross references are not enough. I see some non trivial developments by the author and related, but no substantial coverage by other sources. They are thousands of " equations", for example, the http://scholar.google.fr/scholar?hl=fr&lr=&q=%22Witten%E2%80%93Dijkgraaf%E2%80%93Verlinde%E2%80%93Verlinde+equations&btnG=Rechercher&lr= Witten–Dijkgraaf–Verlinde–Verlinde equations or the http://scholar.google.fr/scholar?hl=fr&lr=&q=%22Veltman-Bell+equations&btnG=Rechercher&lr= Veltman-Bell equations, just try the name of a physicist and equation after that on google. Of course, only a few are notable w.r.t . In response to comments above, it's always possible to reduce the field of study so that they become notable there but I don't see the interest of doing so. Hence I support '''Deletion''', no rename, no merge, it's not in renaming an article that we make its subject notable! Even if the nominator has a coi, it doesn't affect the issue of the afd if consensus is formed that the article should be deleted
— User:Cenarium, 02:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)