Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Bunce
satisfies notability criteria in #Athletes.  The arguments for deletion essentially say that these notability criteria should be tightened--however, that debate really should take place on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) rather than with an AfD nomination.  A few thoughts on one-game players: (a) You can't tell, just by looking at the statistics, which biographies will be easy to expand and which ones won't. For example, I've recently found quite a bit of information on a baseball player who played one major league game in 1913 and will soon be expanding his article. (b) If a person with experience in historical or genealogical research made a sufficient effort, most of these stub articles could be expanded to full articles.  The research, however, would involve trips to research libraries and hours spent looking at microfilm. (c) Realistically, most articles of this type are doomed to remain stubs, not because there isn't verifiable source material available, but because Wikipedia doesn't have the editors who are willing to do the work.  So, I think a discussion of changing the notability criteria could be an interesting one, but under the current notability criteria this article clearly needs to be kept
— User:BRMo, 00:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)