Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanilla DeVille
currently, the article is so terrible to even be eligible for a speedy deletion under '''wp:G11|G11''' (unambiguous advertising or promotion). The subject appears to pass  per award noms and even for her mainstream works, so an article about her is generally acceptable, but this article is plain and simple a BLP nightmare, written like an advertisement and almost enterely based on self-made claims in unreliable sources (including forum posts, lol!). Eg, the claim that she posed for ''Playboy'' could be a good point for her notability and it is apparently well-sourced, as it is referenced by four sources: well, the sources are 1) her official website 2) an interview for http://www.ambushinterview.com/ this website, that is far from being minimally reliable 3) her blog 4) her official website again (lol!). Other things are simply false: "''In 2011, fans named her one of the top MILF performers in the industry.''": looking at the first source (the second one is her website, as usual) a blog (not a generic "fans") selected her for a poll about milfs. The result of the poll is not even known. So, as per G11, an article about her "need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic". She could be notable, but the article fails two things that are more important, Wikipedia:Neutrality|neutrality and Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability
— User:Cavarrone, 06:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PORNBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)