Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Kohan
The article meets the conditions of . I see it as a general bio that needs more citations for clarification and verification. I don't see it falling under . However, "Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources".id. The subject of the article may not be in the Web of Science but that does not mean he is not notable in the world of ideas, and I am not sure if the reference to him in the news article was "trivial". Being an enormous expert can be helpful in notability, but not being enormous does not take away notability. As a doctoral journalism student I have a special interest in the Affordable Care Act and Kohan's prediction of its affects on cardiologists in the United States, as reported, makes him noteworthy
— User:BMWcomputer, 17:07, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)