Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ringsted terror plot
A few voters on the side of keep argue there is in-depth coverage; however, these news stories are typical of the |news cycle. Another editor argues simply |rapid, even though that is a double-edged sword and past its expiration in this case. A few even admit the article is in a poor state which is a ''huge'' deal for |BLPs. The simple facts of the matter are that we cannot claim there is |sustained coverage with the expected news reports as our “evidence” or sufficient coverage to satisfy our |notability guidelines on events, all while somehow somehow negating our core policy of NOTNEWS. A |lasting impact cannot possibly be seen without a |crystal ball so notability has not been established on several counts—and cannot be until we move beyond the news cycle crimes are afforded
— User:TheGracefulSlick, 05:59, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RAPID||WP:BLP||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NEVENT||WP:LASTING||WP:CRYSTALBALL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)