Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headbands of Hope
from the change of !vote above): I didn't dig in far enough to see the change you found so I give you a | hey on that. The notability of a subject (|by sources) is not dependent on the state of the article or lack of sourcing therein. The article "is in bad shape and the only reference without issues is the one I added but the notability of the company is acknowledged by the sourcing found that goes beyond regional and even national. The company, of course, will be somewhat inherently promotional but when written like an advertisement it falls squarely in the middle of |what Wikipedia is not and I feel this article has enough |significant coverage to warrant stand-alone status. There is a fine line between Wikipedia coverage of the company or the individual, per the lead of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), but the sourcing that includes her basically as also the company front person always associates her with ''Headbands of Hope'' so that seems clear to me. I think all subjects should be scrutinized by the criterion found at |NPEOPLE as the test: ''"..."worthy of notice" or "note" – that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia
— User:Otr500, 20:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:HEY||WP:ORGIN||WP:NOT||WP:ORGSIG||WP:NPEOPLE (Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard)