Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariel Weinmann
My first reaction is to say, keep. It certainly looks like a notable case to me. Any concerns of soapboxing/|POV could be addressed through editing. However my worry is that there's not much information on this yet. I couldn't google anything on the subject other than the one source already cited. I'd feel a lot more comfortable in asserting notability if multiple |verifiable |sources could be cited. Has anyone else started covering this story
— User:Scorpiondollprincess, 18:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)