Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (2nd nomination)
this part of the collective Wikipedian vanity series of articles which will never be . The argument to keep this, and similar articles, appears to be "Wikitruth/Daniel Brandt/whatever criticised Wikipedia and Andrew Orlowski/Slashdot/whatever picked it up". Who cares ? Apparently lots of Wikipedia editors do, perhaps because it makes them feel important (cf. ).  more or less explains why this sort of article is a Bad Thing
— User:Angusmclellan, 11:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:CVU||WP:AUTO (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)