Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullshido (2nd nomination)
Can the editors who want to keep the article provide reliable third-party sources to establish that this term satisfies |WP:V and #Reliable sources for neologisms|? Because currently the only article references that mention the term are |self-published sources (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim/browse_thread/thread/883564e27c8ae0ce/e8ea4cfdf68e52ce?lnk=st&q=bullshido&rnum=12&hl=en#e8ea4cfdf68e52ce Usenet posts and a http://www.international-atemijujitsu.co.uk/bullshido.html self-published article on a website). Note that  states: "Neologisms that are in wide use—but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources—are not yet ready for use and coverage in Wikipedia
— User:Muchness, 23:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SOURCES||WP:NEO||WP:SPS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)