Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Aronov
People do not qualify for Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates for political offices they have not won, but this (a) makes no credible claim that he has preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy, (b) makes no credible claim that his candidacy is markedly more special than everybody else's candidacies in any way that would pass the |ten year test, and (c) is referenced entirely to |primary sources and neighbourhood hyperlocals that don't clinch a  pass. Even if he had a strong notability claim, it would still have to be referenced better than this. Obviously no prejudice against recreation if he actually wins, but nothing here already justifies an article today
— User:Bearcat, 11:16, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:10YT||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Recentism)