Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Fee
per Nom) and optional |ATD '''"Merge"''' to (and expand) Great Lakes Theater#Artistic directors. A merge rationale is also supported by |; "C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted" (#4): {{tq|If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.}} A general listing of Google search hits has been shown to not advance notability and "significant hits" directly supports merging. I am a fan of classical theater arts but when a search does not produce anything to allow for more than a two sentence |pseudo biography, the questioning of notability is warranted concerning having a |stand alone article. 12 years is long enough for something of substance to have emerged. The second paragraph is just a repeat of the first, to include duplicate links, but with the added years. This could be added to the first (and only) paragraph resulting in little more than a |dictionary entry
— User:Otr500, 07:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE||WP:PSEUDO||WP:PAGEDECIDE||WP:NOTDICTIONARY (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)