Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilith (hypothetical moon)
The wording of the nomination comes perilously close to . References to to Petit, Verne, and Goldstein-Jacobsen, in published works satisfies notability and renders  (which is guideline, not policy) in applicable. Since this article does, however, address other hypothesized second moons, I would support the article being renamed something that addresses its more wide-ranging nature, and turning this into a redirect to that article
— User:23skidoo, 14:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)