Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winfield Hill
The Art of Electronics|Horowitz and Hill" is one of those texts that is so standard, it is known by the authors' names. It's canonical, like "Classical Electrodynamics (book)|Jackson" for electromagnetism or "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information|Nielsen and Chuang/Mike and Ike" for quantum information. You'll find it in syllabi all over the place &mdash; https://www.its.caltech.edu/~ph118/syllabus.pdfhttps://ocw.mit.edu/courses/edgerton-center/ec-s06-practical-electronics-fall-2004/syllabus/https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/media-arts-and-sciences/mas-836-sensor-technologies-for-interactive-environments-spring-2011/readings/https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-071j-introduction-to-electronics-signals-and-measurement-spring-2006/readings/https://web.northeastern.edu/heiman/2371/syllabus.htmlhttps://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/physics/documents/undergrad/spring2020syllabi/Electronics-for-Scientists-Syllabus-Spring2020.pdf, and then I stopped looking. That's a pass of #C4. Any "|only notable for the one thing" concerns are alleviated by the other points raised by {{u|David Eppstein}} above
— User:XOR, 16:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Notability)