Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steg steganography software
I  disagree with their rationale "Promotional article about |unremarkable software.". The software is freeware and we have already other similar wikipedia articles of similar niche software that certainly are not famous to the general public and some of these does not have any scientific article in their references (Steg steganography software has one). Examples StegoShare, OpenPuff, StegFS, only to mention the software on the same topic that have an approved article on wikipedia. For consistency we should keep (or propose to delete) all of these articles
— User:io, 11:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)