Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perpectual motion machines
I've declined (regretfully) a speedy for nonsense as the wording is clear enough to me. The concept is still in the development stage, and so fails . As I feel (from what is stated here) that this concept will never get a patent, this looks like a long term fail. Patents are not granted on perpetual motion machines unless accompanied by a working model - that is the hard part. Before I'd learned about friction (and other) losses, I'd 'invented' several ways of getting free energy myself. At present, only the passage of current in a superconductor seems to be free of losses - certainly no mechanical system comes close
— User:Peridon, 15:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)