Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EucA
ping|Malus Catulus}} Wikipedia obeys by different rules than a tribunal (and you oversimplified the question of burden of proof, but let us not get astray). In that case, the relevant Wikipedia guideline is , which states that the burden in on the one who puts or opposes removal of material (paraphrased, you might want to read the whole thing). And of course, it makes sense, since proving something is not notable or not discussed in any source is proving a negative, which is impossible in most cases (see Russel's teapot
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BURDEN (Wikipedia:Verifiability)