Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Dollar Grey
per .  A https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8&ion=1#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Two%20Dollar%20Grey%22&oq=&aq=&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&fp=2d61b1e856bd1cf1&ion=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1298&bih=824 Google search produces several reviews and interviews (or what I consider significant coverage) by several sources.  The sources, unless there's some sort of mass conspiracy going on here, the likes of which I've never seen in my several years on Wikipedia, are independent of the subject of this article.  Lastly, there is no reason to believe that the sources are not reliable.  Fosse8, you're simply incorrect that there's "nothing" to suggest the band is notable.  Your opinion seems to be that the sources presented are either not notable (which doesn't matter, whatsoever) or not reliable to which you have provided no evidence.  The reviews and interviews are certainly more than "a two-line stub noting they exist".  I think anyone would be hard pressed to claim that http://40ozrobot.com/home/?p=2841 this and http://www.hard-rock-reviews.com/2012/01/interview-with-two-dollar-grey.html this article are less than "significant coverage
— User:OlYeller21, 17:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)