Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanity (journal)
as the article stands. First issue published in October 2010 - no matter who publishes it, it could be a total flop. "This nomination for deletion is unwarranted and spurious."? No, it isn't. It's quite warranted as the article is unreferenced and gives no claim to any notability beyond the publisher and editor being blue-linked. As to 'spurious', I quote the definition in http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spurious: "not genuine, authentic, or true; not from the claimed, pretended, or proper source; counterfeit." This nomination is here, it follows the rules of Wikipedia and cannot be defined as spurious. Your dictionary might be worded differently. Referring once more to the article - there could be notability. We need more than a solitary link to the subject's website. Please see  and . In my opinion, the article should have been deleted back in June, as no issue had then been published - according to the current state of the article - . I am quite prepared to change my !vote if evidence is produced that this publication is more than just a flash in the pan issue with no future
— User:Peridon, 19:11, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Notability)