Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siglap Secondary School
per existing consensus that there must be evidence of |non-trivial external sources.  As far as I know there is no consensus that all secondary schools are notable.  In Siglap's case, as there is what some might consider a ''claim'' to notability (being the first coed secondary school in Singapore) I checked some databases.  Nothing non-trivial appears in Lexis-Nexis, Proquest, Infotrac.  I can't even find independent verification for the claim to notabilityhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=co-educational+siglap+schoolhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=co-ed+siglap+school.  I suppose there's no reason to doubt the school's website on that point, but it's not a convincing claim to notability if no reliable source outside of the school have, er, taken note of it
— User:Pan, 02:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)