Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gore Effect (2nd nomination)
The phrase has proven worthy of discussion in secondary reliable sources over a span of years; there is enough material there for the topic to easily meet . The phrase has progressed beyond a neologism to part of the culture of the climate debates and the sources already in the article show there is enough discussion to form a reasonable short article on the topic. I don't see a lot of synth in the article. Summarizing and giving examples of secondary sources' interpretation and reception of the phrase is what we should be doing. If there is material that does synthesize a new assertion, then it should be removed--but this is a simple matter of editing, not deletion. A notable topic and a modest article without major problems suggests keeping the article
— User:Mark, 18:38, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)