Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of French apartheid
per Urthogie and jossi et al. I've said elsewhere regarding these sort of "apartheid" articles that I'm not crazy about them period. However, the nom and delete votes in this case looks like simple  to me. The article is properly sourced, and is perfect alignment with the other similar articles. I haven't read a good explanation why an exception should be made in ''this'' case. I'd also ask that the "deletionists" in this case try and ease up on the ad hominem arguments. They're poor and don't work
— User:Armon, 22:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)