Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worcestershire Record Office
the AfD was relisted so more people might contribute to the discussion. Of course those who have contributed before may continue to discuss the article's merits, but it is usual to describe that as comment, not as another !vote. Concerning  vs. : The latter says that "Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources ...", which this one does not and apparently cannot. And our #REASON|deletion policy states: "Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following ... Articles whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth)" This article, despite your previous claims, fails both  and , so deletion is reasonable
— User:Huon, 12:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTE||WP:V||WP:DEL||WP:N||WP:N||WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)