Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Jakobs
Clearly not notable. Searches returned zero hits for him (except for one, which I'll get to in a moment), so fails . Doesn't come close to passing . Article is clearly promotional. Didn't know there was a restriction for A7'ing an article after it had been tagged for notability. I don't think I've ever done it, but didn't know there was some guideline against it. Only that you can't re-add a prod tag. Now, about that single hit: imdb.com.  This imdb.com is the poster child for why imdb.com is not a reliable source. Obviously self-published and self-promotional, it reads like the resume of a friend I had in high school who was trying to puff themselves up for agents. In fact, I'm bookmarking his imdb.com page so I can bring it up anytime there's a question about imdb's notability
— User:onel5969, 12:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR (Wikipedia:Notability)