Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The British Guide to Showing Off
I do not think I am going to far out on a limb here to suggest that as the film is completed, will release on November 11, and has already been covered in http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/latest-reviews/the-british-guide-to-showing-off/5029506.article ''Screen Daily'' and http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945670/ ''Variety'' we have a meeting of  and can let this one remain and grow normaly through regular editing. And toward the nominator's concern of the |current version lacking available sources, |notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation within an article. '''BUT''', I'll be glad to go over |and add some to perhaps encourage a decision to withdraw this nomination. Mostly though, I am quite concerned that this brand new article |was sent to AFD only 4 minutes after being created and while being actively edited by its author,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_british_guide_to_showing_off&action=history when |doing a bit of reasearch and then tagging for concerns |is the preferred response to new articles
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 20:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFF||WP:UGLY||WP:NRVE||WP:ATD||WP:BITE||WP:BEFORE||WP:DEL (Wikipedia:Notability)