Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alluc
for now; the sources are almost all about allfg, not alluc.  What's the relationship?  Also, the coverage seems incredibly sparse for something asserted to be so significant.  Compare YouTube, which is all over the news.  Most coverage of this seems to be in comparison with YouTube or other sites, generally much more significant ones at that. I suppose the inevitable copyright and takedown lawsuits will generate a bit of coverage... My Factiva search turns up one source about alluc (the Financial Post one), the balance are just "and also..." in lists.  I do not subscribe to the strictly legalistic "two = multiple" interpretation of , I like multiple to mean a British Standard Several, so we can compare and establish that it's not just reprints of press releases or whatever.  Whatever, two sources for something asserted to be of global significance is woeful.  Might be significant one day?  Yup, might.  Or might be shut down for copyright violation.  Come back when we know which
— User:JzG, 09:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)