Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Kean
Let us know how you really feel.  The analogy does not hold water.  Notability criteria is NOT based on what is "good" for society at large.  This person, I will assert, is far more important to us ''vis-a-vis'' her positive contribution to society, but that is '''not a criteria''' for inclusion in WikiPedia.  The fact that a wider audience is aware of a Porn Actress than of a Wisconsin High School teacher means that the Porn Actress is actually ''more'' worthy of inclusion by the basic |notability guidlines.  Being a good person is not the baseline notability guideline for inclusion.  If it were, important figures like Pol Pot and Jeffrey Dahmer would be unworthy of inclusion, while some of my buddies that are also High School teachers (some having won national awards even) would be worthy of inclusion.  That's just silly.  We don't have to like that people are notable for doing things that we find abhorrant.  Do I think that Porn Actresses ''should be'' notable for what they do?  My opinion doesn't matter.  Society at large shows such an actresses notabilty, and wikipedia's inclusion of the subject matter is a reflection of that.  Award-winning high school teachers are not as notable in the society at large.  Is that right?  Probably not.  Is it the place of a document like WikiPedia to change that?  Definately not
— User:Jayron32, 17:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NN (Wikipedia:Notability)