Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Ann Drazba
This seems to me like a fairly open and shut case where we should have an article and where the argument for deletion is, respectfully, extremely threadbare.   addresses situations where someone is famous locally for something they did locally. This person is notable--and not just in her hometown--for being one of the first two American nurses to die in the Vietnam War.  Nor is she notable just because she died, as the nominator suggested; she's notable because of when she died, where she died, what she was doing when she died, and why she died.  As a result, numerous reliable sources discuss her life and her death, only a few of which were added as a starting point when creating this article earlier this evening.  (To my admitted irritation, this was nominated for deletion the very evening it was re-created.)  The argument the nominator made on the talk page is likewise insufficient as a basis for deletion: That not everything needs its own article.  Sure, but notable subjects covered in reliable sources should.  That's... basically what we do here.  Moreover, consider the following
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LOCALFAME (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)