Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments
Maybe I missed it, but I think that those claiming POV problems have not mentioned one single example of something in the article that they think needs to be fixed to achieve NPOV. As GoRight says, "Calorimetry is not a POV." The nomination statement says that this article gives undue weight to one aspect of a subject; but covering specific aspects of subjects is just what we're supposed to do per This article looks to me to be reasonably NPOV or probably fixable by editing a few specific sentences if anyone does point out any POV problems. I would be very surprised if there weren't a significant amount of literature on the topic of calorimetry in cold fusion, since it's an important aspect of what has been a widely-publicized, controversial and intriguing topic.  Here are '''secondary sources''' I'm finding from simple web searches; quotes are Google snippets
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SUMMARY (Wikipedia:Summary style)