Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EdgeWave
Wikipedia:Significant coverage, and in fact the rest of the guideline, is a good read. In general number does not matter as much as the quality and depth of how the sources go. Specifically simply press releases (that is mostly reposted as-is) and routinal reportage (like board member or personnel changes) almost never count to notability. According to my own search, the subject's collaboration with Huawei http://www.fierceenterprisecommunications.com/story/huawei-edgewave-team-combat-cybersecurity-threats/2015-04-22 might suggest a slightly better potential than the thousands we turn away via speedy delete, but is still lacking in very compelling evidence of importance to solidly keep. PS. If you are working for the company you have an inherent |conflict of interest where there are more things to be aware of. '''野狼院ひさし
— User:Hisashiyarouin, 11:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)