Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Press Organization
I'm unconvinced by any of the reasons given for keeping this (but willing to be convinced). Searches for reliable sources in English and French find nothing substantial http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22African+Press+Organization%22&um=1http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22Organisation+de+la+Presse+Africaine%22&um=1http://books.google.co.uk/books?ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22African%20Press%20Organization%22&um=1&sa=N&tab=nphttp://books.google.co.uk/books?ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22Organisation%20de%20la%20Presse%20Africaine%22&um=1&sa=N&tab=np. I'm a very strong advocate of |countering systemic bias, but I don't see why we should give any particular leeway to an organisation based in Switzerland, a country that has very good internet coverage. In fact we would be perpetuating systemic bias by keeping this, by implying that a European organisation claiming to represent the African press is more notable than African organisations
— User:Phil, 21:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CSB (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)