Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom McAlpin (2nd nomination)
Your original comment noted that he was ''mentioned'' in three non-Disney publications (a short blurb in a travel-jobs newsletter; a brief announcement that he would be speaking at a College of Business; his in-house profile at Make-a-Wish); a small number of ''mentions'', even by |“reliable sources”, isn't sufficient evidence of |“notability”.  And, while the edits subsequent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom McAlpin||the last AfD discussion may have been improvements of ''some'' sort, they do ''almost nothing'' to address the issue of ''establishing |“notability” with |“reliable sources”''.  If someone says that a building is ''structurally unsound'', one does not point to subsequent improvements in ''the electrical wiring'' as if they addressed the complaint.  Where are the |“reliable sources” that treat him as '''notable
— User:SlamDiego, 23:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)