Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gnostic Movement Incorporated
in addition to , also fails notability, neutral POV, what Wikipedia is not (i.e., not a soapbox), verifiability and possibly vanity standard (see , , , , AIN). Fix each of these problems and use reliable sources () -- I'll be happy to switch my recommendation to "keep". I don't have a personal POV on Gnosticism-related articles (does that make me agnostic on gnosticism
— User:A, 16:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:NN||WP:V||WP:VAIN||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)