Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Autism Association
for now. Per the nom, I'm not seeing coverage in independent, reliable third-party sources. The ''Medical News Today'' pieces seem to be essentially press releases, and I agree with Eldereft's appraisal of them as criteria for notability. As a side note, there is an ongoing need to clean up the walled garden of content forks relating to "alternative" theories of autism - dozens of articles on non-notable groups and individuals are created, and then used as s for content which violates |undue weight. Given the history of abusive editing on this particular topic, I believe we should rigorously apply notability criteria
— User:MastCell, 18:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK||WP:WEIGHT (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)