Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Suburban Jungle
no decent third-party sources about this topic, let alone any suggesting the website has any noted achievements, impact or historical significance. Being distributed by two minor, little-known publishers does not meet , nor would meeting a notability guideline mean that this article meets our content policies. Without decent sources, all we're left with is original research and wikipedia editor's points of view. Note that several of the comments above misinterpret . Plan 9 Publishing  is not a "well known and independent .... online publisher;" it is a little known book publisher whose own unreferenced article appears to fall short of .  "Nontrivial hosting" is not part of , though "has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself" is, which this article does not meet.  Claims of a "non-trivial print run" do not appear to be backed up here or in the article; do we have any sources for the print runs of these books? Any reviews of these books by reputable publications? Or have four supposedly "notable" books been published, yet no decent sources have bothered to note them?  If a webcomic falls in the forest
— User:Dragonfiend, 08:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WEB||WP:CORP||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)