Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about Melbourne
This is a no brainer to delete (please keep in mind that I already !voted earlier in the discussion). 1.  This fails  horribly.  Here is a copy/paste from the  page as an example of Listcruft: '''''List of songs containing the sound of a woodpecker '''''.  By simple substitution, that can be '''''List of songs about '''''.  2.  Fails , which I would like to remind you, is '''''OFFICIAL POLICY''''' in wikipedia.  Wording from : ''It introduces an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source; ''  Without a |reliable source to each and every song name listed on each and every one of these lists, it does not pass , and is deemed ''original research''.  Since wikipedia has an offical policy of not allowing original research, there is no other conclusion than to delete all of these lists
— User:sumnjim, 14:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LC||WP:LC||WP:OR||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Listcruft)