Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cambridge Working Group
I have looked at the sources, both included in the article and some mentioned above, as well as conducting a  search. I see nothing that specifically brings this group notability outside any other activist group that made for a single purpose. Some are notable and some are not. The question remains, does the specific subject, the entity, receive significant coverage, not of its ideas but of the entity itself, in multiple, not numerical but those in which a wide range of view points is discussed, reliable and independent secondary sources? Nothing in the notability guideline  states that a thousand mentions equal a significant coverage, in fact, it reflects the exact opposite. Mentions are not stackable nor do they build to notability. The entity fails notability. If there is an appropriate redirect or merge I would not be opposed to such action
— User:Tsistunagiska, 20:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:N (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)