Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Applied Rationality
The criteria for deleting this kind of article is , not whoever has been editing it or whether you think it is promotional (which it isn't) or negative (which it has been in the past). On Fqn9010e0754032's smear attempt - I'd encourage you to look into the actual history of edit disputes to see what was going on rather than uncritically using them as argument fodder -- Jytdog and I were both trying to reduce and rewrite the same article at approximately the same time, not arguing about what kind of content should be included in the final version or not. The insinuation that I have something to do with Vipul is wrong, I never had anything to do with him. Finally, Fqn9010e0754032 is a single purpose account which was created yesterday, and I've noticed that throwaway accounts attacking LessWrong/CFAR/etc have been on the rise over the last month or two on several websites, so we could both play this game if we wanted to
— [[User: Kbog|'''K''']].[[User talk:Kbog|'''Bog''']], 20:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)