Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd R. Woodson (2nd nomination)
Nothing has changed since the first AfD.  still applies. The article should have gone to deletion review instead of being reposted, and it still remains substantially the same as its prior incarnation despite promises of enhancements and a raft of new coverage. There has in fact been minimal follow up coverage in the local media, just a handful of reports of his indictment and fringe coverage related to honouring of officers.Further to the NPOV problems, for an apparently non-terrorism related incident, the word terror (including  derivatives) is used an incredible 18 times throughout the article, 5 of which are in the second paragraph. This is clearly being used as a  for other issues such as conspiracy theories about the authorities definition of terrorism
— User:Wjemather, 21:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)