Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rikhav-Infotech
Ye gods, that was hard reading. Repetitious, disjointed, and on if not over the borderline of spam, it fails for me to credibly show any notability for the company. Why do people say 'pitches for' - especially when they're not in a baseball nation but a cricketing one? Whatever the reason, it suggests spam and/or copy&paste. The references seem to fail . The nomination is on the ground of lack of referencing - I consider the lack of notability more important. A notable subject without references can be cured. I don't think this one can
— User:Peridon, 21:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)