Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otherkin
I think it's rather clear from even a casual reading that the  rule exists for preventing wikipedia from becoming a platform for cranks or ''pet theories''; the Otherkin article is neither.  Otherwise the article describing Bright|Brights would need to be deleted as well: it also explains the nature of a term used by a group to describe itself, and from primary sources at that. I'm sure it wouldn't take much effort to find other examples
— User:Coren, 21:54, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)