Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanta
Per , people who satisfy at least one of the items in  may merit their own Wikipedia articles.  Per  and , a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the subject itself.  Zanta has been the subject of '''(1)''' McLaren, Leah.  (April 30, 2005).  Globe and Mail.  ''Who is that capped man? Meet Zanta Ho Ho.''  Page M1 and '''(2)''' Gerson, Jen.  (September 12, 2006).  Toronto Star.  ''So close to the stars, yet so far away; Tiny Penelope transfixes crowd Going with the Flow nets no result.''  Section: Entertainment, Page C3.  Since Zanta has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the subject itself, Zanta is notable per .  In addition, per , "Published works" is intentionally broad and includes published works in all forms.  Both Globe and Mail and Toronto Star are Published works per .  Further,  does not require a minimum geographic region for the fame.  The opinion that "his "fame" is entirely local to Toronto" as posted by an annomous Wikipedian is not relevant to whether Zanta is notable per  and .  Moreover, whether a Wikipedian personally thinks a subject is or is not notable is not relevant to whether Zanta is notable per 
— User:Jreferee, 14:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:NOTABLE||WP:BIO||WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOTABLE||WP:BIO||WP:NOTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)