Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Century
I can understand the nom but the term itself is being used more and more widely and is receiving ongoing press coverage. See http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/editorial/onwards-into-the-asian-not-just-chinese-century-20120826-24ugf.html this, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/australia-in-chinas-century-conference/story-e6frg8zx-1226365873251 this, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/Chinas_Century.pdf this and http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2099180_2099179_2099178,00.html this. I think originally there might have been an element of  and perhaps even  but it is now becoming a regular feature of ''Western'' politico-economic commentary
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]], 00:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Too soon)