Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fowler-Noll-Vo hash function
There is certainly plenty of discussion of it online with lots of people referring to it as widely used. The only questionable part is the "reliable" requirement of , but that is largely for verifiability and the large number of medium-quality sources (university lectures, peer-reviewed academic publications using FNV, tech sites, etc.) make this quite verified in my mind. I think it's unreasonable to expect newspaper articles and things about even notable algorithms--I google the extremely notable heapsort and the source quality is not obviously better than for FNV
— User:Gruntler, 07:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)