Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoon
There seems to be a misapprehension that  means Wikipedia may not have articles about words themselves. This is not the case. As long as the article is – or can be expanded to become – more than a mere dictionary definition (in this case, as long as the article says more than "''Hoon'' is an Australian word for 'pimp'", which it does), it is acceptable at Wikipedia. I would point out that we even have a Thou|featured article about a word
— User:Angr, 18:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)