Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greeneyes (second nomination)
as the sourcing here is a problem. Wikipedia has established standards for #Self-published_sources_.28online_and_paper.29|verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable_sources|reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Forum_for_Encyclopedic_Standards|encyclopedic standards, which don't seem to be met here. The suggestion to transwiki is a good one, as the material itself is not so poorly written as to be of no worth. The issue here simply is sourcing, and the article does not meet notability guidelines for inclusion here. We have a responsibility to readers to assert notablity and importance, by citing multiple non-trivial published sources, and to adhere to |web content guidelines. Should the consensus favor inclusion, then this article still is in need of serious cruft cleanup
— User:NetOracle, 06:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Verifiability)