Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluoride Action Network
I see your point about notability transcending mere popularity: Wikipedia should only document, not raise a subject's profile.  You have not, however, answered the important question, '''''Is there  an organization dedicated to opposing fluoridation more notable than FAN, or does opposing water fluoridation consign one ipso facto to a deserved obscurity?'''''.  If you can think of no more notable organization, it begs the question of whether you think the ''topic'' is even notable, a reasonable question, rhetorically.  Also, you keep saying that FAN is not , but have not substantiated this beyond saying that all who do take note of them are irrelevant.   I am not assigning you motives, but I am struggling to see any ''evidence'' of what you are saying. When you imply that having an article on FAN amounts to, ''passing along random gossip, perpetuating hoaxes, or posting |indiscriminate collections of information.'', it is difficult not to see a reliance, here and elsewhere, upon a working assumption that ''anti-fluoridation is just dumb
— User:smaines, 02:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:IINFO (Wikipedia:Notability)