Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neckbeard (slang)
as {{u|GretLomborg}} says, |Wikipedia isn't Urban Dictionary.  The term itself has not received significant, in-depth coverage and has only been used in major publications as a passing reference to instances of Internet harassment.  For the benefit of the closing admin, while the keep !votes are numerous, they are generally shallow and are only superficially valid.  I respect {{u|Andrew Davidson}} as an editor, however his !vote is based upon |other stuff existing and these other articles cover the beard style in-depth whereas the article we are discussing is based upon its Internet-lore status.  Two other keeps are merely "it's covered in publications" but such reliable publications are not cited.  Although {{u|Cunard}} does mention a whole chapter of a book being dedicated to the Internet phenomenon, I can find few other reliable sources that give ''meaningful'' coverage that would create content useful for an encyclopedia.  Perhaps a section in Beard would be more appropriate but I am of the opinion that the keep rationales are more numerous but weaker
— User:DrStrauss, 12:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTDICT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)