Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Makim Khalisadar
per RomanLady. I agree completely with her first sentence: "The article is focused on Abdul Makim Khalisadar, but it relates to, and evidences, much broader issues." The article is a |coatrack, not primarily concerned about this one incident, but masquerading as a biography. Otherwise, it's a one-time news story because of his religious affiliation, with no sustained coverage, which doesn't indicate any historical significance
— User:Dominic, 06:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)