Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bell & Ross (3rd nomination)
The sources are pure churnalism, and in most cases pretty blatantly so. The only proper RS one is the NYT article, but it's about sapphire crystal, not about this company, and in any case not enough on its own to satisfy  / . (I was first going to say keep and improve by cutting out all the promo blurb and fluff like 'collaborated with Renault' etc., but I'm not sure there'd be much left. And even then it wouldn't be any more notable than it is now
— User:DoubleGrazing, 08:15, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)