Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suresh Danoda
People are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just for existing as civil servants in the government bureaucracy — but two of the four footnotes here are |primary source content on the government's own |self-published website about itself, which are not support for notability at all, and the two which are real media are just short blurbs about him announcing a government policy, not substantive coverage about him doing anything relevant to our notability criteria. The notability test for a Wikipedia article is being ''substantively'' the ''subject'' of a ''significant'' volume of press coverage, not just getting your name into the newspaper twice as a giver of soundbite in an article about something else
— User:Bearcat, 18:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:No original research)