Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhoda Jenkins
The current version of the article reads like a memorial, and at first glance I was expecting to endorse the proposed deletion.  But a further search for sources reveals a surprisingly extensive amount of coverage about her, as shown at GNewshttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&tbs=ar%3A1&tbm=nws&q=rhoda+barney+jenkins&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&tbs=ar%3A1&tbm=nws&q=rhoda+jenkins+stanton&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= and GBooks.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=rhoda%20barney%20jenkins&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=ar:1,bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=np The NYT articles are examples (and I do not agree that the first one is mere "human interest" or that the second one is merely a mention "in passing") but as the search results demonstrate there is quite a lot more (much of it behind pay walls).  Rhoda Barney Jenkins may not have been a particularly notable architect, but all this coverage suggests that she may have been notable for her contributions to women's rights and history.  Or maybe some of this content should be merged to the too-short article about her Nora Stanton Blatch Barney|mother, or in some other way we could |preserve the information about her and her distinguished family.   At the very least, there is too much here for this content to disappear via the invisible prod process, without some community attention.  I'll be interested in other opinions from those who look through the potential sources
— User:Arxiloxos, 07:31, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Editing policy)