Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lawyers
per . Interesting that I'm citing the same policy as the user above me who wants to keep the article.  Where I'm coming from is the section that reads "Lists that are too general or too broad in scope have little value, unless they are split into categories."  A list of lawyers is way too broad and an |indiscriminate collection of information.  This information is much better in a category because nothing binds them together.  A list of defense lawyers or a list of law specialists in the field of civil rights, or something of the like would be acceptable, but "lawyers" is too encompassing for a list
— User:Themfromspace, 05:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SALAT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)