Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional wrestling attacks
the content is legitimate, but so are the concerns with OR and excessive detail.  The "how to" guide concern does not strike me as serious because describing the move is necessary for understanding it.  However, I suspect that most of those here who, as I did, heard about this AfD from WP:PW believe that no major changes are necessary to these articles.  This is not the case.  If there are no secondary sources that describe the way these moves are performed--no books, websites, magazines, etc.--and if no such sources are cited, then there is really no way to say that the articles pass  and .  For now, I'd be in favor of keeping the articles.  However, if verifiability and excessive detail concerns are not addressed within, say, a month, and the vote were to come up again, I'd be inclined to favor deletion
— User:Croctotheface, 14:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)