Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yesod (web framework)
nom - was  done? Any quick search finds more than the book that's in the EXT?!  clearly doesn't apply.  applies as article is primary source mess, but not commercial spam or anything (i.e. "NOTMANUAL is irrelevant, PRODUCT is NCORP and this is software not a company or product and nom knows it is against consensus at other AfDs" ), but  is policy - we don't delete just because sources aren't in the article. In this case, they're even in the article! (footnotes are all primary/non-third party but that's irrelevant for N). just reading the article it has the O'Reilly book. Further, nom's AfDed two of the three Haskell web frameworks, removed content from several Haskell articles and is against consensus at AfD on the Haskell xmonad today
— User:Widefox, 03:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:NUKEANDPAVE||WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP||WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)