Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-graphy (2nd nomination)
and '''fix'''. This is not a "textbook case of ", it is a textbook case of an AfD submitted by somebody too lazy to think of ways to handle a difficult case. This could be a disambiguation page, or a redirect to a section, but it this would need editorial expertise. Submitting an AfD does not need editorial expertise. The question is, will Wikipedia benefit from -graphy being a redlink? I do not think so. The real question here is, what is the status of th stuff in :Category:Glossaries? Are these articles? Do they all violate ? We need a wider discussion of this and a more satisfactory solution than what we have now. This isn't something that can be solved in a bunch of isolated AfDs. If you really want to push this, you will need to AfD all of :Category:Suffixes, since there is no conceivable reason to delete an article on the suffix "-graphy" while keeping articles on other suffixes
— User:Dbachmann, 11:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DICT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)