Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of Catwoman (2nd nomination)
Last I checked, a ''wikt:directory|directory'' (as referenced in ), is a list of ''names'', not a bibliography|list of references. (Anyone else tired of seeing that comment as a reason to delete a list someone doesn't want?) And I'm rather surprised that on an encyclopedia we have editors "voting" to delete such references. If these have no value, why do we list first appearances? If these have no value, why do we have articles on comics' characters at all? After all, as I've noted elsewhere, these are a listing of the information chronologically by publication. Not "in-universe". (It's about as non-"in universe" as one can get.) But perhaps I'm missing something, so please let me know how this is different than what I would read in: ''"general encyclopedias, specialized encyclopedias, and almanacs
— User:Jc37, 05:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)