Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintek
Also invoking  as an additional reason for deletion of this article. I still doubt heavily that even with a massive re-write it would come close to meeting either the letter or the spirit of  regardless of any increased conversation about it's business practice. It's practices have no significant national or trans-national impact, and the issue is not receiving significant coverage in the mainstream press, invoking #fn_6_back as these are not major authored works, but one time press articles about a minor and localised issues. The company is private and is '''not used''' in the calculation of ASX indices. My request for deletion under  remains. Further to the citations of financial status, this was information provided to the newspaper in question by the company themselves and would not meet the criteria of  and  being that the information ''is not independently verifiable''. Consistent with , such citations do not meet the Wikipedia:V#Burden_of_evidence|Burden_of_evidence section of this policy. thewinchester
— NONE, 13:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:CORP||WP:CORP||WP:CORP||WP:V||WP:REF||WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)