Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
Correct me if I am mistaken, but tallies during AfDs are deprecated, are they not?  This AfD requires a wholly uninvolved, totally disinterested and highly experienced Admin to close it.  One who will read the monotonous argument, counter argument and repeats thereof, and will sort out the wheat from the chaff calmly.  Since emotions are running high on this it might even be wise (assuming procedures will allow it, and using the spirit of  if they do not) to close the discussion prior to considering and posting the outcome.  Were I an admin, and were I to be stuck with the task of closing this monster I would look not only at the arguments made in this discussion, but at many surrounding circumstances and naturally at the article itself, knowing that this was also likely to be taken by either "side" to deletion review.  And I would write a small treatise on why I reached the conclusions I reached.  I am pleased I am not in this position
— User:Timtrent, 16:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)