Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of French apartheid
quite obviously. A neologism. Let us not fool ourselves: ''everyone'' who comes here ''knows'' that this article's creation and continued existence is disruptive; it was created in response to the Israeli Apartheid article (which, I maintain, should be about the use of the term and not the mess of charges and counter-charges it is now) in order to indicate that allegations of apartheid are widespread. This is ; however widespread segregation, even legal segregation is, the only ''term'' that is encyclopaedic is Israeli Apartheid. The others are all, quite simply, . The article is terribly written, largely OR, reading far too much into one or two op-eds. Delete with extreme prejudice
— User:Hornplease, 19:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)