Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogrammer (2nd nomination)
Last time the decision was not "keep" but rather "no consensus", so I don't understand how the last nomination would be an argument either way. Also, many of the people who said keep argued that it could improve, which it hasn't. Finally, the subject of the article seems to be getting less relevant over time, which might bring  into play
— User:TheDracologist, 18:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SUSTAINED (Wikipedia:Notability)