Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gropegate
This actually does seem to be a term used by the media, but not solely in connection with Arnold. While news stories related to him do show up in a Google search for "Gropegate" (#2, after Wikipedia, is http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/02/recall.schwarzenegger/index.html this, but the actual article does not use the term, so I'm not sure why it is showing as a #2 result for the term), and these news reports: http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/10/9/212519.shtml http://goliath.ecnext.com/premium/0199/0199-3303779.html, as well as those "subscription only" URLs, but the term does come up quite a bit in a news http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Gropegate&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn archive search.  However, it is also associated with other public figures, as seen http://gawker.com/news/culture/the-christian-slater-gropegate-souvenier-docket-106195.php here. I think the bigger issue, would be the obvious  concerns, and that if the article remains, it must be exceedingly well sourced, and very carefully written for neutrality and BLP issues
— user:ArielGold, 00:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)