Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10x Management
Getting a "fair amount" of press (even in reputable publications) is not enough for a reference to establish notability. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. Usually, analyst reports which profile a company are considered good references but the Forrester report that mentions this company is a mention without a company profile. https://web.archive.org/web/20180918194041/http://gelookahead.economist.com/it-software-talent/ The Economist article relies on information provided by a co-founder and fails ORGIND. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-19/why-an-ex-google-coder-makes-twice-as-much-freelancing The Bloomberg reference doesn't have any in-depth information on the company and fails  and is more about the experiences of software engineers than the company itself. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/24/programmers-price The New Yorker magazine piece is really churnalism where the journalist is a fly-on-the-wall of a client's experience in deciding to hire 10x and also fails  as it relies on information provided by the company or their client. https://web.archive.org/web/20190119021720/https://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/08/representing-programmers-as-if-they-were-celebrities/ The NYT article is a blog post and fails . Topic fails GNG/
— User:HighKing, 14:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:RS||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)