Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape combat
the last umpteen AfDs for that had the same or better deletion arguments and still ended in overwhelming keep. Until articles on characters are declared unencyclopedic by major policy changes and Gods is thrown in a mass nom, it's staying. '''Speedy keep Gielinor''' - no reason given for deletion. For the record, I'll say what I said last time: articles on fictional universes are encyclopedic. As for the rest: '''keep''' - ''these are not game guides'', no matter how many times someone keeps saying they are. These are no use to someone looking for a walkthrough to the game. Sometimes some slips past the local editors, it's easy enough to fix. Notability not being inherited doesn't apply, it refers to related but separate topics (like a player or developer, in this context). Notability doesn't apply, RuneScape easily demonstrates notability, and that it's components are notable as a result ''is'' a valid argument. If that wasn't a valid argument, there would be rampant holes in Wikipedia's coverage; Bill Gates' article would be forbidden from mentioning his upbringing and education. Notability not being inherited would apply to Gates' family, they aren't notable just because he is.  is a very real, valid concern. We are not talking about some little Flash game here, this is a full-fledged MMO with probably more history and at least as much content as the other major MMOs. If the main article needs cleaning up, please explain why it is GA rated
— User:CaptainVindaloo, 18:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SIZE (Wikipedia:Article size)