Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! in popular culture (3rd nomination)
The article used to be http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeopardy%21_in_popular_culture&diff=113756813&oldid=108830357 much worse off than it is now. I thought my standards as I set in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! in popular culture (2nd nomination)|the previous nomination were strong enough to determine notability and define what should be included. Apparently they are not, even as nobody raised objections or clarification then. It's up to other editors to define a stricter standard and implement it. Most "in popular culture" articles are inevitably going to be lists of some sort, because they have the nature of pointing out examples. If referencing and lack of independent commentary on the subject is the problem, in order to strictly satisfy |verifiability, that is a valid problem to be corrected. After that's done, that may be a stronger reason to keep. But I disclose that I am not going to be the person to do that. If we continue with the current pattern of "in popular culture" articles on AfD, almost everything in :Category:In popular culture and its subcategories will eventually be nominated at some point. I do not wish to partake in such debates until consensus is shown: when either  is expanded to explicitly include such articles, or Wikipedia:"In popular culture" articles is adopted as a content guideline
— User:Tinlinkin, 06:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)