Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabur Khan
This article reads like a CV even when it was heavily trimmed down, and now that someone has replaced a large amount of the original content its even worse. Of the 26 references, 1-7 are |primary, 8 is blogspot (not |reliable), 9 is a directory type site, 10 also blogspot, 11 doesn’t mention him from what I can see, 12 is primary, 13-15 are wiki articles (|circular), 16-17 are primary, 18 is a broken link but from the url it seems to be primary and finally 19-26 are all primary sources. There is not one independent reliable reference and a Google search seems to show why, there aren’t any. This person is not notable and most of the article content is not relevant or suitable for an encyclopedia. At the very least it needs to very reduced to a stub and properly referenced per BLP guidelines
— User:Sarahj2107, 22:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:RS||WP:CIRCULAR (Wikipedia:No original research)