Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SambaStream
Main products seems to have been launched late 2009 http://www.online-information.co.uk/online09/press_exbtr_item.html?press_id=151992, some in-depth mention in Information Today a few months later is at least indicative of notability, so let it rest for a while. WP is  and there is also encyclopedic value in providing timely information, and the  guideline is not law.   Smerdis is running a personal vendetta against ''More of the "project management" morass.'' - there is no broad support for this view, and, eh, it's not project management but "content management" - even that I'm no sawy in this field, I'm pretty sure that these two things are entirely different.  Despite the eyesore "on top of its multi-tenented architecture", it's not too spammy either, can be fixed easily
— User:Power, 16:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY||WP:N (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)