Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rekcahdam
If one is to allege the subject meets the GNG, where are the reliable sources which discuss the ''subject'' in "significant detail?"  Indiegames.com ''bills'' itself as a blog, and the two reviews are two short paragraphs apiece about the game, mentioning his name and nothing more.  The Rock Paper Shotgun and kotaku.com reviews have ''three'' short paragraphs apiece about the game, mentioning his name and nothing more.  The gamercareerguide.com cite was written by the subject himself.  That some of these sites have Wikipedia articles do not make them reliable sources, nor does the subject's name being mentioned in passing confer notability, since |notability is not inherited.  Like Hobbes Goodyear, I don't consider this remotely close; even if you presumed they constituted reliable journalism |by our standards, the sources presented that don't come from the subject's own website or from his own pen ''don't discuss him at all,'' let alone in "significant detail
— User:Ravenswing, 16:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:IRS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)