Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WetLeather
The problem seems to me to be that the references given are mostly trivial mentions of the group. There is nothing that backs up the content of the article or demonstrates that WetLeather has had "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" per . The main source of information seems to be the group's own web site... which brings us on to another matter. Large chunks of text in the article are taken ''directly'' from the website, which is a serious copyright violation and completely unacceptable on Wikipedia (in fact, this is a speedy deletion criteria
— User:EyeSerene, 17:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTE (Wikipedia:Notability)