Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical social justice
Scholarly and borderline-scholarly papers coin neologisms all the time. This one hasn't reached the point of being sufficiently widespread and established to qualify as noteworthy. Sources not by Lindsay and Pluckrose are false positives. Some use "critical" as a synonym for "vital"; e.g., {{tq|Some counselor and counseling psychology training programs also might consider including educational, legal, and public policy institutions as experiential or applied learning sites for the development of '''critical social justice''' competencies among their students}} (https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007.tb00440.x Constantine et al. (2007), emphasis added). Others use the phrase to describe their own work, but overall there isn't an established meaning consistent across authors. It's not our job to bring unity where the actual literature has none. (Compare the recent deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigenous Ways of Knowing|Indigenous Ways of Knowing on  grounds.)  applies
— User:XOR, 19:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SYNTH||WP:TNT (Wikipedia:No original research)