Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NOLAP
It is mostly . There is very little in the way of secondary and primary sources to support the article. Even your website article posts back to this WP article page, with only 3 other Google page hits supporting both this term and the concept, also linking to this page. In addition to that, the article also advances a narrow field, specific to certain financial reporting products. It also focuses on XBRL. Why? There is many more reasons.  I hope it doesn't put you off
— User:scope_creep, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)