Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian A. M. Fuller
with Corydoras. This was a difficult one to evaluate for the reasons outlined by Elemimele, but in the end there's just not enough significant independent coverage for Fuller to meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. While, his work is considered important in his niche field, he doesn't fit , and much of his research isn't peer reviewed (only has a https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Ian+A.+M.+Fuller%22 few hits on scholar). The coverage in the magazines don't meet  as they're written mostly by people within the same small niche (friends of Fuller). His work should be given  in the articles of the fish that he researched, but I don't see a policy based justification for keeping a separate article for Fuller
— User:Qwaiiplayer, 17:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NACADEMIC||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:DUEWEIGHT (Wikipedia:Notability)