Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of recluses
per  and objections raised above. The page for recluse already provides examples, which do not need to be complete in order to be valid. But attempting to maintain a ''running list of notable people'' requires efforts toward both accuracy and completeness, something not only difficult but also privacy-invasive toward |living persons. Also, a list regarding character traits or behaviors should be given sensitivity similar to how religion or sexual orientation are regarded in  and CAT. As demonstrated in this AfD discussion, even agreeing on what ''is'' a reliable source for whether a person is genuinely a “recluse” would be difficult. I second
— User:Pontificalibus, 20:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTCATALOG||WP:BLP||WP:LISTPEOPLE||WP:BLPCAT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)