Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LLBLGen Pro (2nd nomination)
It is entirely notable and easily passes . It is a highly specialized piece of software, which is still well used and well respected in the industry. The article has not been updated for some time, but it is still used and gives a good description of what it is, links code generation and object-relational mapping, and describes well a complex and very expensive piece of software, at the forefront of the industry. Why is it being nominated again?  I think this nomination is vexatious. If you wanted to know what the previous article AFD was about, read the previous AFD
— User:scope_creep, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)