Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Satanic Warlock
per above. I'll be completely honest: it's hard for religious books to gain enough coverage to pass notability guidelines on Wikipedia and that's after the release date. Most outlets just don't want to cover religious works, regardless of the religion. This book doesn't look like it's one of those exceptions, especially since it hasn't released yet. This may gain coverage after it releases, but I'll be honest in that the odds are stacked against it. Most of the places that would be considered RS typically go for your mainstream (ie, "safe") religious works by extremely well known people and the lack of chatter about this book in even the non-reliable sources is also kind of telling. Normally there'd be at least some kind of talk out there somewhere and there doesn't seem to be any, at least none that aren't . I know that this hasn't released yet, but it doesn't look like it's going to be a particularly noteworthy book even within its religion. This is way, way  for an entry at this point in time. This is in :Template:LaVeyan Satanism, so if deleted (which looks likely) then it'll need to be removed from there as well
— User:Tokyogirl79, 06:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:No original research)