Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bieber on Twitter
I know I'm just reiterating what others have said here, but what a pop singer says online is unencyclopedic, let alone warranting of its own article. If your interested in somebody's Tweets, then do you A) read the person's Tweets or B) read about the Tweets on Wikipedia? I have a feeling almost everybody answers "A". The people who want to keep this page can rewrite it a million times for all I care, but the truth is it is |what Wikipedia is not - Wikipedia is DIRECTORY|not a directory, and is also |not an indiscriminate collection of information. Just because something is verifiable and well-sourced doesn't make it suitable for inclusion at Wikipedia. As somebody said above, this is gonna be a tough AfD to close. Does anybody know if we can get Jimbo to close it
— User:RedSoxFan2434, 19:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)