Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Review (3rd nomination)
This view seems inconsistent with the article long having used as references six links to earlier versions of the same WR site. When the reference cited in the article as the official URL, www.wikipediareview.com, is clicked, it displays a message "NOTICE:This domain name expired on 1/16/2012 and is pending renewal or deletion. WELCOME TO: wikipediareview.com." That is presently cited as reference number 6. Don't the old refs to WR then also fail  and ? How can you pick and choose which versions of the WR site are reliable sources and which are O.R
— User:Edison, 16:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)