Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Sood
I agree with SilkTork's analysis. As for the arguments given just above by BiH: addressing the UN only makes someone notable if this address was ''noted'' (i.e., written about) by independent reliable sources. The book references are nothing substantial (an acknowledgement, for example; the first book that pops up may or may not refer to this person). The Google Scholar results are very revealing: several publications pop up. ''None'' of the publications by Kunal Sood seem to have been cited even a single time. To pass #1, one generally needs a thousand citations or so. In short, no indication that this passes  or . As an aside, please refrain from |personal attacks on the nom. That the nom had some technical problems is not too surprising as the process is not easy (advice: use |Twinkle) and in any case, that has been remedied and is ''completely'' irrelevant to this discussion
— User:Randykitty, 11:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:NPA||WP:TWINKLE (Wikipedia:Notability)