Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
Its supposed Alexa ranking was cited, but that raking was misleading, as Alexa gives the same exact rank to a subdomain as it gives to the main domain.  So meta.wikimedia.org http://alexa.com/search?q=meta.wikimedia.org gets the same exact rank as wikimedia.org http://alexa.com/search?q=wikimedia.org.  Also, User:Zoz cited some other Wiki-Media project website articles, but if some of those are just original research and self-reference, then I think they should be deleted too.  I think there's a very strong case for keeping the main Wikipedia article, as Wikipedia is a major website which has recieved extensive media coverage and can thus be written citing those sources.  The same goes for any other Wikimedia website where notable sources have written about it which can be cited.  Someone said that it should be kept on the basis of |"Ignore All Rules," but I don't see how violating self-reference, original research, and NPOV - to include an article about a site which hasn't been shown to be encyclopedic - benefits Wikipedia
— User:ENpeeOHvee, 18:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)