Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeitgeist the Movie (second nomination)
With so much reliable source material, the topic meets . The present article seems to accurately reflect the collective of the independent reliable source coverage of the film. That is Wikipedia concern. From Wikipedia's perspective, it is irrelevant on how the independent reliable sources choose to cover a topic. If the collective of the independent reliable source coverage is POV, then Wikipedia need only accurately reflect that POV coverage for the Wikipedia article to meet the POV policy. If the film itself reflects ideology, accuracy, inaccuracy, fantasy, hoax, etc., that too is irrelevant because the film itself is not independent of the topic per  and not a valid Wikipedia source of information for the Wikipedia article. In other words, the truth of the film content itself is irrelevant to the Wikipedia article on the film. If the film served as a source of material for the Wikipeia article, the Wikipedia article would be nothing more than a  for the film. Since the present article seems to accurately reflect the collective of the independent reliable source coverage of the film,  no longer is an issue
— User:Jreferee, 17:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NPOV||WP:N||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:A (Wikipedia:Notability)