Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R v. Elliott
per Ivanvector's argument.  It certainly has the potential to be notable, but unless and until it rises to that threshold, I don't think it deserves an article.  Slightly contra Rhoark, while I agree that a verdict of guilty would almost certainly be a notable precedent, a verdict of not guilty would likely not set any sort of precedent (not guilty here would not be a total repudiation of the idea of harassment via twitter).  Basically, why rush it?  As we all know Wikipedia is |NOTNEWS.  Thanks
— User:Dumuzid, 02:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)