Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JetBlue flight attendant incident
Huge amount of very significant coverage, obviously passing  and is a major part of the air passenger experience public consciousness.  The arguments above seem  ("I think had he not deployed the emergency shoot ..." "Person quits retail job ..." ).  There could've been ''no'' emergency shoot and he simply stormed off the job and this could've still been notable, as long as the very significant coverage is there.  As for WP:RECENTISM, this is ''still'' getting coverage years later.http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/flight-attendant-loses-cool-aboard-nyc-plane-16676827#.T_MVTXAqkvohttp://www.cnn.com/2012/06/30/travel/flight-attendant-outburst/index.htmlhttp://www.cleveland.com/books/index.ssf/2012/07/william_j_mcgee_tells_us_how_a.html.  Clearly a case with longevity
— User:Oakshade, 15:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)