Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Lavie (2nd nomination)
And userify to the author's userspace for later inclusion.  in my opinion. I disagree that the subject meets  in any way. What coverage there is seems trivial, aggregate or secondary of the subject herself, so no #1. Being a backup singer to Yanni does not meet #4 or #6. #9 is not met either because YouTube is not a music competition. #12 is not met because whatever coverage there was was in aggregate to the video that she appeared in, not for herself. Artist has not charted, and has not released a record through a major label. iTunes doesn't count. The Streamy Awards is mentioned, but obviously she didn't receive one, she was a backup singer for another artist that also didn't receive the award, she just performed. All in all, the article is probably 90% puffery and excessive referencing. The 10% that's left at the end doesn't really qualify for  at this point. If the article is removed and userified, and at some point in the future the subject meets the notability guidelines, I'd recommend the author be a lot more honest about how the bio is structured and sourced. Someone who is truly notable hardly requires that level of |reference overload
— User:FreeRangeFrog, 17:38, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG||WP:BOMBARD (Wikipedia:Too soon)