Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Saxon Spelling
I'm not sure that I would categorize the sourcing as "leaves much to be improved". There's a grand total of one source for a rather long article. I agree that a lot of enthusiasm and care went into the creation of this article, however it just doesn't meet . I do agree that a short summary (based on the one source offered) at Low Saxon language might be appropriate
— User:Waggie, 00:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)