Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Olsson (3rd nomination)
The accusation of  clearly does not apply, since there is no particular event involved. There is no  policy saying we don't care about people known for only one ''theory'', and many of the most notable people in the world are only known for promoting one theory. It doesn't matter whether her works are self-published or not and doesn't matter whether her theory is a fringe theory or not; what matters is whether she and her works are ''notable'' or not. There are even some people who are clearly considered notable for only self-publishing work that is generally regarded as random nonsense, and that doesn't stop an article about such a person from becoming a "Stanley Green|Featured article". There is coverage supporting notability, cited in the article by ''The Times of India'', ''India Today'', ''UCA News'', ''Global Press Journal'', ''New Straits Times'', and ''Dawn (newspaper)|Dawn''. None of those seem to be fringe or self-published sources
— User:BarrelProof, 17:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1T (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)