Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James M. Cahill
The notability test for mayors is not an arbitrary population-of-the-city cutoff. A mayor's notability lives or dies on the quality and depth and range of his ''sourcing'', not on how many people he happens to govern — 56K is certainly large enough that an article ''could'' be kept if it were substantive and well-sourced, but 56K is not an "inherent" notability freebie that would ''exempt'' a mayor's article from having to be substantive and well-sourced just because it's technically possible to verify that he exists. But the only sourcing shown here at all is the city's own |self-published website about itself, not notability-supporting |reliable source coverage in real media
— User:Bearcat, 17:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)