Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fag hag (2nd nomination)
The concept of a "fag hag" is more than the definition of the term, so  doesn't apply.  |Notability is established and EO|neologism is denied by its commonplace usage within media and popular culture (~200,000 Google hits).  |Verifiability is Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Problem articles where deletion may not be needed|no reason to delete the article, and the prevalence of the concept outside the article denies allegations of |original research.  None of this information was difficult to come by, and the lack of due diligence in making this nomination appalls me
— User:Ssbohio, 05:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WINAD||WP:N||WP:NEO||WP:V||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)