Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metatron's Cube
This is gratuitously invalid deletionism over an obviously extraordinarily notable subject, with a presently sub-par (nonetheless good-looking and well formatted) Wikipedia article. I'm not even a specialist in this field, just a casual noob, and I know that it's notable geometrically, culturally, artistically, historically, or otherwise.  But you ignored all those obvious categories just to pigeonhole it as the one thing (some fringe theory about something) that you could try to disqualify.   is text "for which no reliable, published sources exist", not text for which the sources Wikipedians haven't posted yet, you haven't found yet, you don't know how to find, or you don't want to find.  Deletion is not a valid response to a subpar article, period. You don't delete it; you fix it, you call others to action, or you just walk away
— User:Smuckola, 10:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)