Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Grime (2nd nomination)
to Numberphile – basically per {{u|David Eppstein}} in the last AfD. Grime focuses on public engagement so is not likely to pass most  criteria, but it's perfectly possible for him to be a notable populariser per #C7 or the . At first glance I assumed he would be—''Numberphile'' certainly is notable—but on closer inspection the sourcing just isn't there. Most of the references in the article are to non-independent sources or passing mentions of Grime in popular articles about mathematics. I searched quite hard and couldn't find anything better. The closest is probably https://books.google.dk/books?id=QUNhDwAAQBAJ&q=james+grime#v=snippet&q=james%20grime&f=false ''The Best Writing on Mathematics 2018'', but we can't have a BLP hanging off a single, one-paragraph contributor bio in one book. But it's not a bad article. In the interests of |preserving appropriate content we should redirect to the project he's most associated with (Numberphile) and tag it with {{tl|R with possibilities}}. It can be revived should more independent sourcing emerge. &ndash;&#8239
— User:Joe, 09:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Notability)