Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NHL playoff series
I'm not in this to win any argument, so I have no reason to withdraw. I'm actually on the fence on this myself. Pardon if I didn't point an established precedent that fits this example exactly. Is correlating data and presenting it in a new fashion considered ? That's what we have here: raw data: team X played team Y in 1965, etc, etc. Lets derive from the raw data that they also played in 1974, 1987, and 2011. Team Y advanced 3 out of the 4 times. Its presented like it is relevant, but in reality all 4 series are vastly unrelated because of player/personal turn over. Is that trivial, is that ? I am trying to find similar articles (or evidence of similar articles in AFDs), but I haven't come across anything
— User:TerminalPreppie, 18:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:CRUFT (Wikipedia:No original research)