Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fucking sign
Under , to include all information about the sign in the village article puts undue weight onto the sign in it. The village is more than just a sign. If anything, the content in the village article about the sign should be merged into the sign article. Not to mention that the sign article includes information about it being the most stolen sign in the world, the statistics for the thefts and info about websites offering guidance on how to commit them. And furthermore, what is the difference between saying "Fucking taxpayers" and "London taxpayers
— User:The, 06:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)