Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veem (2nd nomination)
Clearly, not a single reference by Cunard meets the criteria for references to establish notability. Either the references rely on company announcements o they rely on interviews with founders or investors or other related sources, none of which meets the threshold of "intellectually independence" as set out in . It states ''Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a sougree with Highking. rce unaffiliated to the subject.'' Each reference mentioned by Cunard attributes the information directly from the company or from interviews or announcements and therefore fails  and . There are a small number of other references where the company is given a mention-in-passing and fails , also part of NCORP. Cunard's assertion that there are "sufficient reliable sources" does not take into account that there are additional criteria for references to meet the criteria for notability. If any of the Keep !voters above {{u|CNMall41}}/{{u|David Gerard}}/{{u|Cunard}} can point me to a minimum of two references that meet the criteria for notability, I'll happily review them and |change my !vote if they are good
— User:HighKing, 13:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:HEY (Wikipedia:Notability)