Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientology controversies
A controversy article on Scientology is valid because the Scientology movement has been... well... ''controversial''. The nominations dismissal of "Look how many sources this article has!" looks arrogant, considering that the presence of relevant and reliable sources goes right at the heart of the |notability and |verifiability policies. To make it clear, the sources clearly demonstrate that this is a topic which is of considerable public interest and therefore notable. Three of the six points listed in the nomination are irrelevant to deletion. Weasel words, and NPOV problems are all surmountable. The last point about the church suing is a problem I'd classify as "very potential", and if the church did take legal action, that would be an issue for the Wikimedia Foundation, and not the community. Points one and two just shows that this is an example of  style coverage
— User:Sjakkalle, 08:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:SUMMARY (Wikipedia:Notability)