Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 ANZAC Test
Does the nominator have any reasoning for the bald assertion that the test is not notable? No reference is made in the nomination to any policy or guideline. No reference is made to the multitude of references in the article demonstrating this to be a match that received wall-to-wall sports media coverage over a substantial period of time, particularly before the match. The match is considered so significant that the announcement of the venue months in advance gets coverage in national media.http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-sport/christchurch-to-host-anzac-test-20100605-xm1h.html This match did not receive routine coverage of the kind described in  or . It is an annual event between two of the three best rugby league national teams in the world. It was also notable for being the first even ever held at Melbourne's AAMI Park (which the article notes). These kinds of tests are rare: there are only two or three test played every year between Australia, New Zealand and England. In short, this appears to be a drive-by nomination: the thought put into it certainly appears disproportionate to the work that multiple editors put into the article
— User:Mkativerata, 23:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)