Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chlotrudis Society for Independent Film
Sorry, I don't see it.  An advanced Google News search turns up only TWO hits for this obscure local organization: a press release from its own website, and a Globe article.  Strictly local coverage of its events fails WP:GEOSCOPE, and the GNG requires that there be ''multiple'' sources -- if there were fifty ''Boston Globe'' articles, and still nothing else from a |reliable, independent, third-party, published source that wasn't the ''Globe,'' that would not pass the GNG.   requires that, as a non-commercial organization, the organization not only pass the GNG, but that "The scope of their activities is national or international in scale."  This organization would fail that test as well, unless it could prove that it has "achieved national or even international notice" or "there is substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area."  Add in that this blizzard of subordinate articles is just plain absurd -- and if no one else files a bundled AfD on them, I'll be happy to do so myself -- and there you go
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']], 09:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IRS||WP:CLUB (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)