Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (3rd nomination)
councillors are generally not notable. This one is no exception: he fails , lacking sufficient coverage in independent reliable sources. Nothing significant has changed in that respect from the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination)|last AFD on May 23rd. The ''only'' in-depth coverage is from The Register; unless someone can demonstrate that more exists, this article should be deleted
— User:Robofish, 06:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)