Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Eyerman
Interesting concept that  means we should not argue that people are notable on account of the jobs they do. That's not my reading. My take is that, even if a job is notable, a person doing it is not notable unless they are personally covered in independent, reliable sources. For example.https://www.thecalifornian.com/story/news/2016/08/08/charlotte-eyerman-leaves-monterey-museum-art/88438554/http://www.montereycountyweekly.com/archives/2013/1107/charlotte-eyerman-ushers-in-a-new-era-at-the-monterey/article_865d2444-4719-11e3-93fc-0019bb30f31a.htmlhttps://www.artforum.com/app.php/news/charlotte-eyerman-appointed-director-of-monterey-museum-of-art-42379  and  do not discount local sources
— User:Thincat, 10:07, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:INHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)