Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERP system selection methodology
very selectively) to Enterprise resource planning, per reasons above. I think the lead is about all that could be merged based on the sources. Almost all of this article is OR/SYNTH, that is more of a |technical guide than an encyclopedic article. This is not an independently notable topic apart from the merge target. Even if sources did exist, this alone is not a reason to have a stand alone article; in this case the content would be better included in the target. This is an unneeded CFORK. {{ping|MarioGom|SailingInABathTub|XOR'easter}}, would you be amenable to a selective merge of the lead? &nbsp;//&nbsp
— User:TimothyBlue, 16:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOTGUIDE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)