Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Near future in film
Doesn't qualify as unverified speculation because the entries in the article are, for the most part, reliably sourced, being either articles featuring statements from actors, directors, producers, or studios regarding upcoming projects, or entries from reliable sources derived from said articles.  That said, the intent of the article is best served by replacing the comingsoon.net sources with sources more informative and specific, because, while comingsoon.net is reliable, it is not a primary source, and in itself serves the same function as this wikipedia article.  So, instead of having  the cominsoon.net entry for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, it would be more appropriate to reference, for example, a news article about how the stars are signed on to produce said movie.  rystal also implicitly allows articles on future releases of movies by warning editors to avoid advertising or unverified claims.  Also, all the films listed are in either production or development at some level, and therefore are not only considered future events, but ongoing projects.  And, finally, given that individual articles on planned movies, assuming that there are reliable sources in which to find information on those movies, are considered valid topics, a topic that functions as a list of said movies, functioning to paint a picture of hollywood production in general in the near future, should also be considered valid
— User:Warhawk137, 14:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:C (Wikipedia:Copyrights)