Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavi Begtrup
People, regardless of their field, are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they have jobs: simply being an inventor is not an automatic exemption from having to establish the ''notability'' of his work as an inventor, being a "published scientist" is not an automatic exemption from having to establish the ''notability'' of his work as a published scientist, and on and so forth. No matter what field a person is involved in, the notability test is not automatically passed just because it's possible to verify that he exists — it requires independent |reliable sources to establish the enduring significance of his work by ''analyzing'' it. But his scientific and entrepreneurial work is referenced entirely to |primary sources (staff profiles on the self-published websites of directly affiliated organizations, etc.) that are not support for notability, with no indication whatsoever of any external analysis of his importance — and while there's clearly a small smattering of campaign coverage in the context of his campaign for mayor, the existence of a bit of local campaign coverage is not an exemption from having to pass  for the reasons I explained above: if the existence of some campaign coverage were all it took to hand an unelected candidate for office a  pass that ''exempted'' them from NPOL, then ''every'' candidate for office would ''always'' be exempted from NPOL, and NPOL itself would be meaningless since nobody would ever actually have to be measured against it at all anymore. So no, nothing here is enough
— User:Bearcat, 13:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:NPOL||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)