Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CS2D
Erpert, your sole warrant for the deletion proposal rests upon , I contended that your justification for non-notability is not based on faulty evidence and provided a first hand source to the author of the game who explicitly categorizes the organization in question as an unaffiliated third party. Since the actual author of the game isn't the one who is making the edits, I don't see how his statement is irrelevant or harms the position contesting the deletion proposal. I agree that sigcov is not fully fulfilled, however if we strictly uphold the notability guidelines, then no articles will ever come to fruition. I advise giving it a bit more time
— User:Phailed, 23:37, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:COI (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)