Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Current Physical Chemistry
This comes under . Criterion 1 says it is considered by reliable sources to be influential. I don't see how this is possible given how new it is, but I checked the "most typical" way of verifying the criterion. It is not listed in the Science Citation Index, but I can't check the other two noted because you need a password. I also can't make various other checks because of similar issues. Criterion 2 says it is frequently cited by reliable sources. It may satisfy this by being "frequently quoted in conventional media as an expert source in a particular area." I don't find a single instance of this for this journal. Criterion 3 says it has a historical purpose or significant history. It's a new journal, so it can't satisfy this. Based on the above, I don't think this meets . Not finding any significant coverage ''of the journal itself'' anywhere on the web, I believe it fails  unless offline sources can be found, which is unlikely given its newness
— User:Batard0, 08:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NJOURNALS||WP:NJOURNALS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)