Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Waters
Individual does not pass . What is relevant is whether a subject is |notable, whether the information in the article can be |attributed to multiple independent, non-trivial third party references unrelated to the article subject, and whether the article conforms with Wikipedia policies concerning |the biographies of living persons, |conflict of interest, |copyright matters, and the like. This article does not make the subject appear notable enough for Wikipedia, and searching on Google (what "Ghit" means) does not reveal sufficient non-trivial independent third-party references to this. Hard-copy references from non-trivial sources (from books other than his works, for instance, or magazines) talking directly about this individual would also make acceptable references, but I don't see any of that in this article. Dreariness or the lack thereof does not matter with respect to Wikipedia policies, nor do personal opinions about things. Anti-American sentiment and sarcasm will not bolster your argument, even to fellow non-Americans such as myself. And yes, the article is not written in an encyclopedic matter - it looks as if it had been written for a promotion. Wikipedia is not for getting attention for non-notable subjects. The subject has to ''already be notable''. (Edited
— User:Charlene, 01:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:ATT||WP:BLP||WP:COI||WP:COPYRIGHT (Wikipedia:Notability)