Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOT.TUNES
Page has not been edited since August 31st, so I suppose it's safe to assume that the developer has taken it as far as he or she intends. While there does seem to be ''some'' claim to notability (its sources show it has been covered in PC World and Wired (the latter is posed as a blog, but note that it is a blog created by editorial staff)) several of the references are not  for the purpose (ZDNet does not refer to DOT.TUNES; Tipmonkeys looks like a blog). We're cautioned at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) not to create criteria that unfairly discriminate against smaller companies, which are less likely to attract major media attention but which may have equal notability (as opposed to fame) to the large companies. However, there's really no assertion in the article I can see to suggest encyclopedic inclusion is appropriate for this
— User:Moonriddengirl, 12:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)