Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Blacketer controversy
per sources noted by Cirt. It's a notable controversy. The nominators's claims that this is a "non-event" is voided by all the coverage, the claim that it's "unintellible for someone outside the Wikipedia community" appears to be untrue for the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sam_Blacketer_controversy&oldid=296253088 current version. And I don't see any more  concerns than there would be for Essjay controversy. Of course, we could always delete it and then just recreate it later when there's even ''more'' coverage of Wikipedia sweeping it under the rug
— User:Pixelface, 23:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)