Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Bezetti
I added a source for content about her husband. This does not actually add to notability just content sourcing but I have been unable to find anything, especially support for "her career took a very successful course",  more than passing mention that the subject was just "an opera singer". I would like to state that |"Civility" is not only policy it is also part of our |"Five pillars". I do not feel that editors are required to boldly state every time ''"I performed a  search!"'' and think it is Wikipedia:Casting aspersions|casting aspersions to imply that it is not performed by anybody. There are stipulations laid out, |"considered a minimum search requirement", and if that is performed without success, that would include sourcing advancing  and not just content, then notability can be questioned. It is not unreasonable to expect sources to be |supplied which is backed by many WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines (,  (people) (including WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:NMUSIC), Wikipedia:Citing sources, and many others for |inclusion.  states: {{tq|Wikipedia articles are not a final draft, and an article's subject can be notable if such sources exist, even if they have not been named yet. If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate. '''However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface.'''}} I don't see evidence of notability in the sources provided for an actual , Wording "her career took a very successful course" is backed by a dead link so is |"peacock terms"|. Since notability is questioned providing https://books.google.com/books?id=O1cYAAAAIAAJ&q=Bezetti+Frincu&dq=Bezetti+Frincu "snippets" do not really provide evidence. If that is the direction we are being gently herded then it is not cool. I would rather see evidence of notability that would permanently "keep" an article than hopes of one day finding a |crystal ball, or suggestions that evidence "might possibly exist" somewhere in the universe
— User:Otr500, 20:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CIVIL||WP:5P4||WP:BEFORE||WP:PROVEIT||WP:V||WP:PAGEDECIDE||WP:NEXIST||WP:BLP||WP:PUFFERY||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:notability (Wikipedia:Civility)