Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Janus
to Janus v. AFSCME. Even though the subject has received additional coverage for his employment ''subsequent'' to the case, that information is only of interest because of his participation ''in'' the case. So, while the subject may be notable, placing information in needed context is a better service to readers than creating a standalone article (see ). The additional information about the subject's subsequent employment already exists in Janus v. AFSCME as the single sourced sentence it merits
— User:Bakazaka, 21:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOPAGE (Wikipedia:Notability)