Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (2nd nomination)
his accomplishments in the Putnam was covered by mutliple reliable sources inluding the LA  Times which isn't small potatoes.  On this alone, I'd !vote keep although some might argue that it might be .  But when you combine this with a highly cited paper, it takes it beyond a single event
— User:Whpq, 13:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)