Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialwok
I agree that a lot of the article is advertising and unencyclopedic. On the other hand, the product is real and  has generated a lot of buzz on techie blogs (in which category I am including TechCrunch). However, there has been zero coverage in general-interest or mainstream media, as opposed to blogs. I would propose a compromise: keep the article, but strip out all the advertising stuff ("look at all the wonderful things it does!") and leave it as a stub until it generates some real  coverage. (BTW Druidswok, your argument and agitation here is not helping your cause - particularly not your repeated argument that other articles are just as bad. Your best bet at this point would be to stand back and let the community evaluate the article on its merits
— User:MelanieN, 16:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)