Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midas List
but get rid of the list sections. The links available are enough to meet |notability in my view, and http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2011/04/06/nitpicking-the-forbes-midas-list/ this article in particular provides good secondary analysis to justify a stand-alone article, even if it ends up being a tad short. The issue of notable lists being reproduced in articles has been brought up at AfD several times before, and my understanding is that the contents of the list can be easily be considered creative expression because they are compiled arbitrarily, and that even listing only the top entries is also problematic since that would the most relevant and interesting section for Forbes' readers
— User:Frankie, 17:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)