Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Galsworthy
I approached this somewhat methodically, and ignored the canvassing in favor of policy arguments. I first reviewed the sources. I excluded any sources written by Mr. Galsworthy, since they are primary sources and are all opinion pieces about Brexit.  I don't see that a case is being made that notability is based on his meeting . I also excluded his academic papers as sources, since we're also not basing notability on scientific achievements, per . Those sources seemed to be a roundabout way of substantiating his academic career.  I then looked up his organizations to see if they were notable; what I'm finding is that by Wikipedia guidelines, they are not - there's no sign that any of the groups meet . Compounding this is the lack of in-depth coverage of Mr. Galsworthy himself, coverage we'd expect to see with a notable person's article.  I hope others will confirm the absence of material on his early life and education. What we're left with is essentially a case of  - with the 1E being his vocal opposition to Brexit. That's not enough in my experience to demonstrate notability
— User:timtempleton, 22:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NWRITER||WP:NSCIENTIST||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)