Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Inc.
In my opinion, the only convincing argument I'm seeing for removing the article is that the only notable thing about this company was the Iowa Caucus incident. In that case, move all of the content of the article into a page or subsection about the incident and leave a redirect. This isn't a reason to delete the page history, and I've got to admit that it gets frustrating seeing so many decent arguments for ''merging'' being used to advocate ''deletion.'' With all of that said, I'm not entirely convinced that the page as is fails . So long as a page about a company has "significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources" it meets the notability guidelines. I think there's a very strong case to be made that notability has already been established based on the existing guidelines. If, however, notability has ''not'' been established for an article about Shadow Inc. to remain, then the content should be moved from one page to another with a redirect left behind, ''not'' deleted
— User:Vanilla, 07:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COMPANY (Wikipedia:Notability)