Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of the Harry Potter stories (2nd nomination)
Fails |notability and |verifiability as well as |the fiction policy extremely badly - even if the books themselves are notable, it doesn't mean this timeline is. It doesn't really matter if the article supports all its clear |original research with a couple dozen cites of the books themselves and over thirty cites from just one of the many fansites used to source the article (that fansite, by the way, seems to be the basis for this article as it has a lot of content dedicated to hammering out a timeline like this one), because despite the considerable work obviously put into sourcing this article, the author was unable to find even a single relevant secondary source. It seems like a lot of people aren't well-versed on policy in this AfD, because you can source a series' content from itself all you want, but it's nothing more than fansite-level cruft until you can find secondary sources, otherwise you could put articles about anything fictional on Wikipedia without fear of it being deleted. Just because the books are notable and a few subjects from them are notable, by the way, doesn't mean a low-interest |plot summary anyway. Also lacks significant real-world coverage, but at this point that's just another nail in the coffin. I suggest that people read  as it covers pretty much all my arguements
— User:Gelmax, 18:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:V||WP:FICT||WP:OR||WP:PLOT||WP:FICT (Wikipedia:Notability)