Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PolicyGenius
I agree with {{u|Paisarepa}} that it has serious  and  issues and there are some  issues with some of the references but that these issues should also take into consideration of other references that prove notability.  This means that it needs to be rewritten by a non-COI editor or two to get this article up to scratch ASAP.  It seems to me that enough of the reference articles do support noteworthiness and dont have GNG issues, from what I can see from a cursory glance, such as the https://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2015/06/15/online-insurance-agent-policygenius-nabs-5-3-million-series-a/ Wall Street Journal article or the https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/24/policygenius-30m-norwest/ TechCrunch article or the https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/13/your-money/life-and-disability-insurance/flat-on-your-back-not-a-good-time-to-consider-long-term-disability-insurance.html New York Times article.  In short I think that deletion might be a bit cavalier, but then again I would say that as I am more of an Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia|inclusionist then a deletionist by default
— User:Discott, 14:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:COI||WP:NPV||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest)