Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Kasaraneni
Fails ; I could find no publications at all at Google Scholar. Fails  because being named one of the top 50 physicians in a given field by a magazine does not amount to a "well known or significant or award or honor"; magazines publish such lists all the time. Fails  for lack of significant coverage by reliable sources; he is mentioned in the Pulse Magazine top-50 list, which got a little bit of press (BTW the Economic Times article and the Deccan Herald article cited above are the same article), but nothing close to |significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Basically he appears to be a successful, well-regarded physician in general practice; that's not enough for inclusion in an international encyclopedia
— User:MelanieN, 17:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:42 (Wikipedia:Notability)