Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of recluses
as an |indiscriminate collection of information. While we can all find sources of people describing them as a recluse (eg: https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/music-theatre/2019/03/scott-walker-wasn-t-recluse-he-just-thought-compromise-was-toxic Scott Walker), I can't see any evidence that there are sources about ''lists of notable recluses as a whole''. In particular, the sources produced by Cunard seem to be passing mentions of recluses as part of ''other subjects'' as opposed to sources that document recluses directly, while the ones from Clarityfiend appear to be a bit of light humour such as "How much of the Syd Barrett factor has John Deacon got?" which isn't really suitable for a general article. Perhaps a category would be more appropriate
— User:Ritchie333, 11:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)