Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jingle Cats
It looks like the nom is making a good-faith nomination; I don't see any evidence of him trying to disrupt Wikipedia to make a point, as discussed in . At the same time, AfD is for discussing whether articles deserve to be in Wikipedia at all; the nomination is about a content dispute and contains no assertions of valid reasons for deletion. Thus the AfD nomination is flawed and should likely be withdrawn. Such content disputes are best handled on the talk page of the article. If the stakeholders cannot come to a consensus on the talk page, then dispute resolution, as described in , might be called for. Good luck to both of you
— User:Mark, 21:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:DISPUTE (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)