Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garduño's
The chain barely meets the standards of otability as established in  because one out of all of the sources is coverage about the company. The rest are poor quality because said provided sources all fall under outine or are rimary. They consist almost exclusively of reviews, listings from travel guides, or from local business directories; not one of the dozen or so other sources are actually about the company. Yes some of the sources provided are unto themselves S|reliable, the reliability of the source does not connote automatic notability on the subject. While the company is local and local chains can be notable, these other sources are not sufficient to prove its notability, which means there needs to be more because a single GNG-compatible sources is not enough to provide the necessary notability to keep around. It needs more quality sources and if they are not provided it should go. I think that it can be rescued
— User:Jerem43, 06:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:R||WP:P||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)