Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Dickson
This article is ''extremely'' well cited with reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. As Cirt points out above, that satisfies much of the general notability guidelines outlined in . Most of the sources are from reliable news organizations, which is satisfactory according to the Wikipedia:Reliable#News_organizations|section of WP:Reliable dealing with those sources. Regarding Glenfarclas' comment above about "major news" coverage, that policy doesn't state all the sources have to be ''The New York Times'' or ''The Washington Post'' or some other national paper, just that it be a mainstream media source. And furthermore, I don't think the fact that this article is of more regional interest than national interest should preclude it anyway. This is a comprehensive, meta:Wiki is not paper|paperless encyclopedia, and I think it should have ''more'' of these articles, not less. And finally, any problems with the encyclopedic writing of the article can be improved as we go along, or via a eer review|peer review
— User:Hunter, 14:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:P (Wikipedia:Notability)