Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus–Norway relations (3rd nomination)
If the closer discounts everyone who is claiming ''any'' relation article is notable (the ongoing general dispute, and the Afd record on several other such articles is prima facie evidence this is not the case), and if they also discount all the |arguments to avoid being given above by various people, then he has no option but to delete this article, because the deleters are the ones pointing out how it miserably fails our criteria for inclusion. Some suggest it is 'well referenced'. So? This is not the sole bar for inclusion here, as everybody surely knows if they are being honest. The article itself does not say one substantial thing that suggests this specific relation has been noted in independent third party sources as a topic. It is a collation of various referenced factoids, which absolutely does not translate into a coherent topic of a notable bi-lateral relation. And let's not forget that the information is not 'lost' if this article is deleted, what little of worthy substance there is here, would simply be moved to the more appropriate location, which is not this random intersection, because a lot of this info is not exclusive to the Cyprus-Norway relation alone
— User:MickMacNee, 13:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATA (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)