Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restored Holy Bible
Bible translations are pretty much a dime a dozen, as every few years someone comes up with a new translation with some sort of gimmick to it. (Easier to read, more "true" to how it was originally written, etc.) Sometimes these translations can catch on and become notable, like the ESV or The Message, but I don't see where this is the case here. Bible translations do not automatically inherit the Bible's notability (). As was said on the talk page, this has nothing to do with what translation is "correct" or "right". This deletion is all about whether or not this specific translation has received coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspaper articles, scholarly coverage in academic journals or academic textbooks, and similar. I'm fully aware of how difficult it is for a new translation of the Bible to get this sort of coverage in RS. Despite the amount of believers, the amount of scholars and newspapers that would cover this ''and'' be considered reliable sources is pretty small. Regardless, that coverage is still required and a search doesn't show where anyone has really paid much attention to this translation. A search brings up nothing that would be considered a RS. That there are very few "junk" hits (false positives) and non-usable hits (primary sources, blogs, forums, etc) is also pretty telling
— User:Tokyogirl79, 03:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)