Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. H. Carroll Theological Institute (2 nomination)
The standards for  state that '''The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself.''', all of which was met with the "church" sources and is more than met with the coverage added based on the items retrieved from the Google News archive. The  standards were created knowing full well that any new and growing company will make efforts -- including hiring PR people, whose sole purpose is to obtain such coverage -- to get articles published in the media, the more the better. That these articles cover the subject in a neutral manner, describe teh school in the context of its "competitors" and within the current Baptist theological framework, meets the "multiple non-trivial published works" standard. That the school was covered by papers in the Dallas/Fort Worth area could be chalked up to local religious coverage that spits back the contents of a press release (I'm surprised this charge hasn't been made yet), but newspaper articles in serious papers based in Kansas City (519 miles from Arlington) and Atlanta (a whopping 800 miles away) bespeak a newsworthiness that meets the  standard, using sources that are inarguably valid per  and , which ergo, by definition fulfil the  standard. Whether it's Iowa hot dog stands or basement diploma mills, those nonexistent hypothetical cases are irrelevant to the question posed in this AfD
— User:Alansohn, 23:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:CORP||WP:CORP||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)