Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Park credits
the two articles into one. |Notability guidelines do not require ''exclusive'' coverage of a subject, and just because there are no news stories or books entitled "South Park's Opening Credits" does not mean the subject is not notable. Even one-sentence mentions in reliable sources can contribute to significant coverage if a significant number of unique one-sentence mentions with different perspectives on the subject can be collected into a comprehensive article about the subject. But in addition a large amount of mentions in news stories, a book about the Simpsons (''http://books.google.com/books?id=n6vZJnxK1XYC&pg=PA213&dq=%22south+park%22+%22opening+credits%22&sig=OkwreeUyB844xjlpHz6T19DTMYc#PPA213,M1 Leaving Springfield: The Simpsons and the Possibility of Oppositional Culture'') actually devotes a ''paragraph'' to the South Park opening credits. One of Wikipedia's biggests strengths is being able to collect information from a disparate variety of sources into comprehensive coverage of a huge variety of topics. Why does it feel like there are forces trying to misuse policies and guidelines in order to reduce Wikipedia to a clone of Encyclopedia Britannica or Microsoft Encarta
— User:DHowell, 21:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)