Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EVO 2
Whether or not it has images or an infobox has no bearing on whether or not it meets the . The sources at the article are largely first party (doesn't count toward notability standards), |not exactly reliable, or don't cover much beyond it's initial announcement. To call it "detailed" is a stretch as well, the article is largely tech specs ripped from the official website or countless delays or "absence of news" type updates observed by editors. (Empty statements like ''The EVO 2 was supposed to be featured at E3 2012 in June, as stated on their site, however it did not appear there
— User:Sergecross73, 19:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:IRS (Wikipedia:Notability)