Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dcfldd
The programs gets 137 hits on Google scholar and about 360 hits on Google Books. The books http://books.google.com/books?id=hI3dqOyboegC&dq=%22Dcfldd%22+-wikipedia&source=gbs_navlinks_s ''The Best Damn Cybercrime and Digital Forensics Book Period'' has an in depth (several pages) discussion of the program, as does http://books.google.com/books?id=v7f4BEoAEAMC&dq=%22Dcfldd%22+-wikipedia&source=gbs_navlinks_s ''Defense Against the Black Arts''. Two more books http://books.google.com/books?id=O3EFpf9N6BgC&dq=%22Dcfldd%22+-wikipedia&source=gbs_navlinks_s Penetration Tester's Open Source Toolkit and http://books.google.com/books?id=J8h8VWUmDuYC&dq=%22Dcfldd%22+-wikipedia&source=gbs_navlinks_s Digital Forensics with Open Source Tools both have 1-3 paragraphs apiece on the program. Multiple reliable sources, two of them in depth, demonstrate the notability of the topic according to . Notability of the topic and no insurmountable problems with the article suggests keeping the article
— User:Mark, 00:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)