Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Neme
I would say that being interviewed by NPR and by Time Online does lend credibility, but I'm concerned that these aren't discussions about her work, but interviews ''with her'' about her work. I'm inclined to agree with , which contends interviews fall under ''primary'' sources (per the footnote). Granted, they definitely show she might be an expert in her field, but seeing as how policy prevents basing an entire article on such sources, I would personally need to see more ''secondary'' sources about her or her work to be convinced that  is met
— User:Kinu, 20:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:No original research)