Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diaosi
Wouldn't calling it a "Non-English neologism" be a form of |systemic bias? We have all sorts of articles about concepts for the western world, but when a Chinese social term is introduced, it's deemed as non-notable? Think about it, this term is by no means "non-notable" - I know that  isn't an absolute measure of notability, however "屌丝" gives https://www.google.com.au/#q=%E5%B1%8C%E4%B8%9D 30,400,000 google results; the majority of Chinese people don't even use Google, they use Baidu -- a Baidu search brings back http://www.baidu.com/s?wd=%8C%C5%CB%BF&rsv_bp=0 100,000,000 results
— User:benlisquare, 02:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SYSTEMIC||WP:GOOGLEHITS (Wikipedia:Systemic bias)