Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Concepcion (2nd nomination)
well, since  and  speedies have been declined on frivolous grounds we'll have to do this the long way. The first AfD found that there was not enough substantial, reliable sourcing to sustain this article. The new incarnation, started by a sockpuppet of a banned editor, is largely identical to the deleted version except for the removal of a copyright violation. Obviously the situation regarding notability hasn't changed since last time, and looking at the state of the sourcing I think the previous AfD got it right
— User:Reyk, 12:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:G4||WP:G5 (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)