Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball canon
because it fails , and , and it doesn't follow .  This is original research on the part of all the editors.  They may be justified in their conclusions about the "canonness", but it i still original research.  There is no verifiability as there is not authority determining what is canon, and no sources from which to draw this information.  And there are disputes of the what is and isn't canon because of this
— User:Whpq, 18:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:No original research)