Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proton pack (2nd nomination)
and fix through regular editing.  Article has existed since 2005 and has seen multiple edits by numerous editors, showing continued contributor interest in the topic. It was kept after an Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proton pack|2007 AFD, with the caveat that while the article needed work it had become the center of content disputes... and yes... it still needs work. As Talk:Proton pack#Real-world"|sources are available showing this topic as being referenced in both related and unrelated fields, we have something that has now become part of popular culture. We have it covered in news and books and it would seem the deletion request is based more upon the problems with the article's |curent state, and a need for inclusion of better sources. My thought here is that it is far better to address adressable issues than it is to delete an article on what has arguably become a notable topic
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 22:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UGLY (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)