Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pharmacology Weekly
wholly unsourced and offering no indication that third party sourcing may become available. In response to S Marshall's "this is an academic journal" argument, I will simply quote : "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." There is no reason to believe that "third-party sources can be found" for either of these journals, so no good reason to retain them
— User:Hrafn, 11:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)