Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palakkattu Madhavan
per meeting  and thus . Sorry {{u|Abecedare}}... but my own |due diligence shows the topic '''has lots''' of coverage in reliable sources. I quickly found http://www.sify.com/movies/palakkattu-madhavan-review-tamil-phdjHJaahaeeg.html ''Sify'', http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movie-reviews/Palakkattu-Madhavan-Ivan-Tamilan/movie-review/47933939.cms ''Times of India'', http://www.ibtimes.co.in/palakkattu-madhavan-palakkad-madhavan-review-live-audience-response-637950 ''International Business Times'' (1), http://www.bangaloremirror.com/entertainment/reviews/Film-Review-Palakkattu-Madhavan/articleshow/47915063.cms ''Bangalore Mirror'', http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150704/entertainment-movie-review/article/movie-review-palakkattu-madhavan-fails-evoke-laughter ''Deccan Chronicle'', http://www.ibtimes.co.in/palakkattu-madhavan-movie-review-round-vivekh-stands-out-others-disappoint-638017 ''International Business Times'' (2), and https://4d1fac7452666a9f1a1e7b6fa5af791fa725173b.googledrive.com/host/0B3ke7sJYbO1gVkRjUVh6bmtqeVU/IndianEnglishNewspaperSearch.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22Palakkattu%20Madhavan%22&gsc.sort= '''many''' others.  Sheesh... please |look first, dude. The article |currently lacking decent sourcing through a possible or intentional ineptitude of its author(s) is |correctable.  We might punish the socks, but we Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater|do not punish our readers when dealing with misguided contributors
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 11:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:BEFORE||WP:BEFORE||WP:UGLY||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Notability)