Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Wilcock (2nd nomination)
that sourcing is unacceptably lacking in es for a  - and I say that thinking he's someone who ''should'' pass prima facie notability, per the "keep" opinions above ... but we can't have a BLP that isn't solidly backed up with RSes
— User:David, 23:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)