Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Rufus Pennington III
The only potential here is that the case he is on ultimately returns something significant from a legal standpoint.  Maybe this case will.  But any assumption on that would be |serious crystal balling.  There is no legal commentary that he has pursued anything in this case that dozens of other lawyers aren't also doing.  They aren't all notable.  A couple of the references are sort of useless.  Any idiot can sign up for the Guantanamo Bay Bar Association.  Any idiot with a law degree can volunteer his services to detainees.  Doesn't really make him special.  A single speech on the issue in a church?  Big deal
— User:Montco, 00:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)