Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unconstructed freeways in Florida
The sourcing is troubling, but perhaps not insurmountable.  Inline sources are sorely needed to judge which statements in the article are actually supported by the only cited source.  That source, by the way, seems borderline RS to me.  The supposed old newspaper articles need to be |cited if we are to take them seriously; Wikipedia is not limited to what's available online.  Defunct websites, on the other hand, are not acceptable sources because they are not |verifiable.  Sorry.  However, I would probably still recommend "delete" even if the above issues were addressed; the determining factor in my mind is |notability.  An individual canceled building project can certainly be notable; if so, write an article about it and include an assertion of notability for that particular project.  A |laundry list of non-notable canceled projects does not become notable simply because you bundle them together into one article
— User:BlueMoonlet, 02:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CITE||WP:V||WP:N||WP:LAUNDRY (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)