Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viewnior
as not meeting the .  This is not a comment on the software itself, which I'm sure is very good.  However, I was not able to find independent, reliable sources that discuss the software in any depth.  There are two "reviews" included in the article, but the sites that review them are one-man operations, self-published, and explicitly therefore they don't count as |reliable sources.  I haven't been able to find anything better while searching myself that indicates that this might pass one of the notability guidelines.  Sorry
— User:Lankiveil, 07:36, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)