Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banana powder
I find it difficult to believe the nom followed  and even did a cursory search of this topic as it took me only a few seconds to find non-trivial secondary coverage.http://books.google.com/books?id=mnh6aoI8iF8C&pg=PA873&dq=%22Banana+powder%22&hl=en&ei=Bz3zTJCLDouWsgOtzISbDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Banana%20powder%22&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=Cf8tAQAAIAAJ&q=%22Banana+powder%22&dq=%22Banana+powder%22&hl=en&ei=Bz3zTJCLDouWsgOtzISbDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQhttp://books.google.com/books?id=DLx08zpU7jAC&pg=PA117&dq=%22Banana+powder%22&hl=en&ei=Bz3zTJCLDouWsgOtzISbDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDcQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Banana%20powder%22&f=false.  I know from starting AfDs that setting them up takes longer than my search on this topic.  Go ahead the throw the "you're assuming bad faith!" charge at me.  I would be happy if this AfD was investigated and perhaps used as an example of why  needs to be an absolute rule
— User:Oakshade, 05:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)