Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical Development Services Agency (2nd nomination)
reply to|User:AusLondonder}} I think it would be helpful to focus on the key element in the nomination's rationale - the apparent lack of sources that would be needed for |notability. I see that you have a general interest in this domain, so I wonder if that familiarity would enable you to track down some wp:rs|appropriate second-party quality sources ? - For example, what has been discussed in the press or in trade journals? Has the agency been seen favorably, or has its existence gone unmentioned? Have any of its various reports elicited commentary? --- etc. I haven't come up with much on a first look. (The lesser issue of what is a "routine" government agency might I imagine be one that is fifth tier in the hierarchy, that is extramural but advertises salaried positions, and that does things like "support research to generate evidence for development of practical and scalable regimens to medically rehabilitate children suffering from ''Severe'' (sic) Acute Malnutrition (SAM) ''without serious complications'' (sic) at home/community level and/or at peripheral inpatient facilities". This wording may not strike you as odd, perhaps even bizarre, but it does strike me that way.) Are you able to help with |notability? If not, I may be inclined to a Merge with Department of Biotechnology, as well suggesting that Translational Health Science and Technology Institute should be merged there as well
— User:FeatherPluma, 21:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)