Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of state terrorism by the United States
who cares that this article is a blatant POV push job? Indeed, a lot of people who edit this article and vote here clearly agree with the sentiments described therein, so the NPOV guidelines be damned. After all, as many have said, this is clearly a bad faith nomination (as one person said, "vandalism"), despite the fact it was made by an Englishman, and other non-American (liberal even) long time users are calling for delete. Why should we pay attention to  and  when it's notable? Thank God for all the , , etc. to help state this is a clear keep. Like one user said, "if you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen" - if you don't like the fact this is clearly a biased article and violates our core policies (and always has and always will), you can just ignore it
— User:The, 00:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV||WP:COATRACK||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:PER (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)