Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extention basin
not (yet) notable. Note to author: you say "''Under the notability criteria Einstein's theory relativity would not have been eligible when it was published''"; that is absolutely correct. Then you say "''it would take a reviewer knowledgeable in hydraulics to determine whether the Extention Basin is notable.''" No: the point of the notability criteria is that we do not expect to have the expertise to make correct judgements about which new ideas are significant. We have a different approach - wait to see which ones gain ''independent'' comment and endorsement. That way we may be  slow to pick up on the eventual winners, but we also do not have articles about the innumerable new ideas that go nowhere. See #The right way to get things you or your friends made up into Wikipedia
— User:JohnCD, 21:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)