Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Bagwell
while the passing mentions are not "significant coverage", we are talking about early-1950s Louisiana. Many paper records are still being digitised (see those few Google Books records that ''do'' exist) and online coverage is predictably scarce. That said, I'd argue that his contribution to Southern politics (his "field") is significant enough for him to pass #2. We're not talking about someone people are trying to "promo" for election now (60+ years later). I think there's value in keeping this article as part of the enduring political record of the region in that era. But I agree that at present, there's not a lot of significant coverage there, such that a strong case is difficult to make. I certainly don't fault the nominator for bringing it here
— User:Stalwart111, 03:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ANYBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)