Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William A. Darden
While there does appear to be some original research here, along with some unnecessary cruft, the sources listed, while not incorporated as proper references, seem to be, at least on the surface, reasonable enough secondary sources to nominally satisfy . While the ''Christian Activities'' article was written by a family member, it was nonetheless published through a standard editorial process of a print magazine. (The magazine, BTW, cites a circulation of 15,000 to 20,000 a month in the Nashville area.) The other sources seem to be of varying levels of coverage, though it is hard to determine without actually seeing them. As to the notability of the subject's awards, while each by itself likely doesn't confer notability, nor might not be just a couple of them, the combination of all of them may amount to a reasonable degree of notability. Thus, I recommend that this article be cleaned up, crufty information culled, and referencing improved
— User:LaMenta3, 07:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)