Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presumptive nominee
clearly referenced in the article as a notable concept used in |third party publications. The content is also currently applicable to the US only, so at nearly the same size as candidate merging it would |unduly slant that article. The historical content makes this much more than a dictionary definition. As the nominator is a |single purpose account, given the subject and timing I feel it is impossible to |assume good faith about this nomination. SPA nominations need to be rejected on principle in my mind
— User:MickMacNee, 16:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:UNDUE||WP:SPA||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)