Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuickSilver (project)
Despite papers going back fairly far, QuickSilver appears relatively new--all reports of it are in conference proceedings and technical reports.  My keep would be stronger if it was in a peer-reviewed publication.  Due to the fact that there are papers on the topic & you can download it, I don't really see how #CBALL can apply.  The article describes QuickSilver as it exists now
— User:Karnesky, 22:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)