Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killings at Coolacrease
Nomath, you are having great fun accusing me of all sorts of things ... but in the midst of your tirades, you have not once addressed wikipedia's policies other than to dismiss them.      Wikipedia is not a blog or a web-hosting service, nor is it indymedia. It is an encyclopedia, with policies covering content and sources. There is no censorship in insisting that wikipedia articles are referenced to |reliable sources, and that it is not used by Mukdowney or anyone else as a vehicle for publishing their |original research.  At no point in this discussion have you addressed any of the issues wrt to policy, and you seem to have not slightest problem with Uk2censor specifically praising this as supporting the aim of "utter discrediting of the RTE programme".  You may not have a problem with such blatant and deliberate misuse of wikipedia for propaganda purposes, but I do; now, if you think I'm wrong, please address policy and guidelines rather than yet another dose of vitriol at me. As one example, rather than accusing me of "high handedness of a breath taking quality", please explain in what sense Heaney's book meet #Reliable_sources
— User:BrownHairedGirl, 17:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:NOR||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)