Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank William
it appears that nom is basing this (and perhaps other) nominations, not on MOS:DAB (which is actually rather silent about this situation) but on  instead. If the nom wishes to nuke {{tl|given name}} pages, he/she should start the discussion as to whether the mention of given names should not be mentioned at all in MOS:DAB; similarly,  is being implied here, yet this is not a valid reason for either keeping or deleting an article, a redirect, or even a disambiguation page. In addition, nom "confesses to preferring the deletion of all {{tl|given name}} pages that don't offer a substantial discussion of the origin and meaning of the name itself" - yet MOS:DAB discourages such a presentation in article space in the first place. At present I remain unconvinced one way or the other as I am unsure as to whether these people are referred to regularly as "Frank William" as opposed to simply "Frank". On the other hand, claiming that this is a vanity page denies |good faith, which itself is a violation of one of the Five Pillars of Wikipedia (two of them, actually). Special:Contributions/147.70.242.54|147.70.242.54
— [[User talk:147.70.242.54|talk]]), 20:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:ALLORNOTHING||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)