Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultima Online timeline (2nd nomination)
Look, the previous AfD closed as a "no consensus" on the strength of '''two''' out of seven editors voting Keep, claiming that |reliable, independent sources exist.  None have been presented, then or in the five months thereafter.  A G-search turns up a number of hits for "Ultima Online" + "timeline," but none actually coming up with the goods.  To quote from , "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."  As it stands, the article can't even make its mind up as to whether the timeline is about the fictional world, in-game (reports of invasions and catastrophes), or about release dates and subscriber benchmarks.  The  and  essays don't immunize an article from the requirements of 
— User:RGTraynor, 16:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:V (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)