Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shock sites (fourth nomination)
To those who argue that the list is useful, being useful is not part of our content policies. We do not entertain cookbooks and FAQs, and  an Internet directory. To those who are concerned with process: the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shock sites (third nomination)|third nomination was bungled by a
— User:Yevon69, 18:45, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)