Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of disbarred lawyers
The main problem here is that anybody who is added to the list is automatically being compared with everyone else on the list, which includes some pretty unsavoury characters.  Disbarment can be the result of technical breaches or egregious misbehaviour, so this is equivalent to a "list of criminals" which includes petty thieves alongside mass murderers.  The small size of the list makes this more likely to happen.  In the prose article on disbarment, a discussion of notable examples with cited content showing why they are notable, is quite acceptable, but lumping together all those who happen to have been disbarred for whatever reason seems to me to be a significant  problem just because the event is uncommon and there is little homogeneity between the individuals concerned. The clincher is that it includes people disbarred through automatic process due to heinous crimes alongside people whose disbarment was the result of professional misconduct hearings
— User:JzG, 15:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)