Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Dach
Almost a candidate for speedy per . The suggestion by {{u|LavaBaron}} that this page should be kept because Dach received less than a sentence of a birthday wish amongst a long list of others from a website that basically serves as a Washington DC staff newsletter is preposterous and a serious error of judgement. I have never seen a more textbook case of . The only reason people want to keep this gossip is that we resent paid and conflict of interest editing. However, this article is the worst kind of gutter yellow journalism (and pathetic moralising "Oh my dear God, no sex please, we're Americans") that any family would wish to protect themselves from
— User:AusLondonder, 22:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ATTACK||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Attack page)