Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiedemann Park
about the new sources. Several are primary which verify some facts like it exists, has a playground, and it got a new fence in 2014. The rest are offline news articles which I see as routine coverage in a local newspaper that do not contribute to notability. As each of these articles (six local news articles spanning 75 years) are each used as refs for a single sentence covering more mundane things (the park opened in 1939, $6k spend on improvements in 1993, there were neighbor complaints about nighttime use, etc.) No in-depth coverage, just another  city park
— User:MB, 22:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:MILL (Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill)