Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Bellow
Humboldt Prize and Noether Lecture should be enough to show notability per #C2. Note that her most noteworthy publication (''Topics in the theory of lifting'', with nearly 500 cites on Google scholar, an enormous number for pure mathematics) is under a different name than the one she uses now and under that same name she does have publications in PNAS, TAMS, etc., contradicting the nomination statement. In any case the nomination is bizarrely justified: it names specific honors that she doesn't have and journals she doesn't publish in rather than looking at what she has done. Anyone, even the most blatantly notable, could be criticized in the same way, because there's always going to be some specific honor that they haven't achieved. Additionally, I find the sudden appearance (on the article talk page) of three different IP-address editors with very few other contributions other than to try to delete one other female mathematician's article (Eugenia Cheng) quite suspicious
— User:David, 17:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)