Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumud
Fails .  This is totally unsourced, except for a vague assertion that it's in a book, with no details.  More disturbing is the assertion that this might be just a typo (or, more probably, alternate transliteration) of Kunud.  Looking at the two articles, I have no way to prove or disprove the assertion.  For an encyclopedia which holds  above all else, that's a serious problem
— User:RoySmith, 22:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)