Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suctum
Nothing related on google of significance, utterly unverifiable.  The indicated offline reference is neither here nor there.  If this were a notable term, there would be more information out there.  As is, the article is either a |dicdef of limited importance or a hoax
— User:Cool3, 00:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NAD (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)