Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradhan senadhipati
Unsourced since 2006 is not a valid rationale for deletion. Per : ''Sometimes an article is nominated for deletion that is not being worked on very much, or has not been edited by a person for a long time, and thus might not be in very good shape. This does not necessarily mean that the topic is unsuitable for Wikipedia; it may be that the topic is obscure or difficult to write about. An article should be assessed based on whether it has a realistic potential for expansion, not how frequently it has been edited to date. Remember that Wikipedia:There is no deadline|there is no deadline
— User:Hawkeye7, 19:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEGLECT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)