Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election, 2016 (2nd nomination)
I agree with LSD on the point that we do need a clear policy on upcoming elections. However, this does seem to violate . The article does cite reliable sources that speculate about 2016, and it would therefore seem to meet the requirements. However, almost all of the cited articles only mention 2016 in passing with a sentence or two of speculation on it, while some even state that "it’s practically impossible to tell at this juncture who might run in 2016." Another source admits that its speculative candidate for 2016 is even unlikely to run (Jeb Bush). In fact, it looks that half the sources don't even support the article text they're cited for. Sure, there are some reliable sources that speculate about 2016, even if only in passing. However, even if there is speculation, I don't believe there is a significant amount of ''well documented'' speculation. I say '''delete''' for now per CRYSTAL and create some kind of policy on upcoming elections as LSD proposed
— User:Timmeh, 20:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)