Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Kimberlin (2nd nomination)
Obviously meets  by a long long mile. Although a quick scan of the article does seem like it may have an over-reliance of primary docs (including court records) that should probably be aggressively pruned, this article is no where  near . FWIW, I think he is materially misrepresenting the outcome of some of those court cases above
— User:ResultingConstant, 15:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NUKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)