Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historic Environment
for all of the canvassing, SPAs, personal attacks, ad-hom nastiness and , I'm struggling to find a coherent argument for keeping this article. The article itself is promotional and little of that promotion is supported by reliable sources. The indexing rates seem lower than we would normally expect from even "niche" industry/academic journals. I certainly couldn't find anything by way of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources to allow it to pass . Merge seems sensible but I have serious doubts about the notability of Australia ICOMOS per  so what would be the point of that
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 21:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OSE||WP:GNG||WP:ORGDEPTH (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)