Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atantaake Tooma
let's assume they meet NFOOTY; the presumption of notability is rebutted by the total lack of sourcing. When I searched for {{nowrap|''"" -wikipedia -transfermarkt''}}, none of these players yield more than three pages of results–most just one or two pages. I could not find a single secondary source on any of them–just statistics and directories. None of the articles seems to have a secondary source listed as a reference, either; they're all sourced to primary sources like statistics websites. All that these articles say is that these players played on the national team in 2003. It's the only information available about these players. That information can be listed at Kiribati national football team. With no secondary sources, we cannot have stand-alone articles, ''especially'' BLPs. These articles run counter to the consensus documented in our core policies like  ({{tq|Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources&nbsp;...}}), , and  ({{tq|Avoid misuse of primary sources}}) as well as our guidelines  and . If someone finds sourcing, these articles can always be recreated
— User:Levivich, 17:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:BLP||WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:No original research)