Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Frome
The citation counts are suggestive of notability via #C1, but (because it's a high-citation field, the papers have many authors, and the citations drop off so quickly after the top 10) not conclusive, as XXan's opinion above already hints. So I'd like other evidence of notability as well, to confirm that suggestion. The evidence we have in the article is: an in-depth profile in TechTalks and an in-depth interview in Kaptur, both of which appear to be reliable and independent. Churnalistic press-release-like stories in TechCrunch and Bizwomen (or maybe San Francisco Business Times?) about Clarifai hiring her, about which I have doubts both about the depth of coverage and the independence. And a story in the New York Times that I can't read because I'm too annoyed at the Times' political hackery to sign up for the free subscription that I could get from my employer, but that seems likely from its first few lines merely to name-drop her as one of 25 signers of an open letter. Not included in the article are https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2017/07/28/ai-leaders-share-path-to-success-with-rising-female-stars/ this story about her featured talk at a women's conference and several reliable-looking but non-in-depth international sources reporting her assignment to a new Google lab in Accra. I think the TechTalks and Kaptur sources are the strongest, and they make a weak case for , but the case is there. So she has a borderline case for two notability criteria, and I think that's enough
— User:David, 06:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)