Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Knox
Individual notability comes from multiple separate events covered by major sources (WP:BLP1E). If the Kercher murder had occurred in Aruba, and then years later, Knox had been last seen with a female prisoner found strangled in Peru, that would clearly be beyond 1 event: 2 felony crimes (a murder, then a 2nd murder). Instead, Knox is arrested for the first murder on 6 November 2007, then years later accuses the Perugia police of abuse (12 June 2009): treated as 2 felony crimes (a murder, then defamation of police). Involvement in 2 widely reported felony crimes, years apart, is a case when WP:BLP1E no longer applies. The chain of connection is broken when the 2nd event is not a likely outcome of the first (instead, a choice was made). When the Perugia court declared a 2nd trial for defamation, they too were acknowledging there was a 2nd event, separate from the first trial (major source on 2nd event: "Knox appears in Italian court to face slander charges", CNN Wire Staff, 1 June 2010, web: http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/06/01/italy.knox.hearing/index.html?hpt=T3 CNN-T3). Ignoring either felony charge is not acceptable, just as ignoring either death, in Aruba or in Peru, cannot be used to claim, somehow, if the first event had not occurred, a person would be just another student connected with only 1 event. Knox has notability from coverage of separate events, years apart. Also, WP cannot delete the article of "Charles Darwin" by claiming a need to combine all POV discussions of Evolution, nor can WP delete "Earth" as a POV fork of "Flat Earth". For those reasons, a separate bio article is based on notability, not on content debates. Per , the proper action is to edit an article to have better NPOV-neutral wording, adding alternative major viewpoints, not instantly delete the article
— User:Wikid77, 17:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)