Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerican Empire (2nd nomination)
multiple verifiable reliable third-party sources, so what is the problem?  So maybe it's silly, but silly doesn't necessarily mean non-notable.  Parts of the article are unsourced and need to be re-written or removed, but that's not a reason to delete the whole article.  Neither is not ''liking'' the subject.  This article looks like a perfect example of #The right way for things made up in school one day to get into Wikipedia
— User:PubliusFL, 00:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFT (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)