Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seductio
Article does need improvement, but we judge notability based on the |existence of suitable sources, not necessarily the current quality of the article — and the existing fr: article ''does'' have suitable, notability-bolstering sources in it that we can simply copy over. A film's notability does not depend on whether its critical or media attention has been indexed by IMDb or not — sure, that can be ''a'' valid place to check, but it's not the ''only'' place we need to check: the absence of such links in that source is not in and of itself a notability-breaker if other sources can be found elsewhere. And neither user reviews nor user ratings are relevant at all, either, given that we don't reference Wikipedia content to |user-generated sourcing. Better sources ''are'' available here, it's just necessary to look at more than ''just'' IMDb to find them. I've been improving the referencing significantly; the trick, as I just learned, is that at the time the sources were spelling the filmmaker's name as "Bachar Chbib" instead of "Bashar Shbib" — once I found that out and made the necessary search term adjustment, the film's sourceability literally exploded
— User:Bearcat, 22:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEXIST||WP:USERG (Wikipedia:Notability)