Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dannielynn Marshall Stern
How can  possibly be applied to a 5 month year old infant, who hasn’t had any life of her own? There is nothing substantial in the story about her as person, but only about the involved adults. Moreover, many of the quoted sources (TV transcripts, interviews) where people raise their claims are primary sources in the sense of close to the situation. I would invoke here the clause #Presumption in favor of privacy|Presumption in favor of privacy of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, who suggest for non-public persons that the ''rule of thumb should be "do no harm". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid. It is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives.'' (Which means for me also no redirect and rather not consider carefully where to mentioning the babys name in other articles
— User:Tikiwont, 19:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)