Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philo (Internet television)
I don't know how we can any longer call the article creator an  when he's clearly branched out to write about notable (in my opinion) American tech startups and Internet entrepreneurs with no relation to one another, other than perhaps that they have been incubated in the Boston area. Why would we want to discourage this with y behaviour? Plus, this ''isn't'' an example of  , it's a neutrally well-written article. And while Philo is hardly a household name, we do have enough coverage to meet the criterion of multiple reliable sources, in my opinion
— User:Shawn, 04:07, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPA||WP:BITE||WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:Single-purpose account)