Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denapaona
for essentially the same reason I've just outlined at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakritir Pratisodh: "Point #5 of  is clearly met: Tagore is a Nobel laureate and arguably the most significant figure in Indian literature. That criterion doesn't require that we have articles for every book he ever wrote, but those, such as this, where a measure of sourcing can be found should certainly be kept. The sources currently in the article, both of which are high-quality academic books, may well also be sufficient to satisfy  and point #1 of . It strikes me as likely that sources in Indian languages, which I'm not able to find as I only speak English, will also exist. Given List of works by Rabindranath Tagore|Tagore's prolific career, it isn't reasonable, as the nominator seems to suggest, to discuss each of his works in his article." To which I'll add that redirecting this to an article where it isn't mentioned would also be unwise for obvious reasons. &ndash;&nbsp
— User:Arms, 20:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BK||WP:GNG||WP:BK (Wikipedia:Notability)