Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiqup
Not every source that includes quotes from the subject's people is "churnalism". Independence is only missing when the whole article is based on words by the subject. Neither the Telegraph article nor the source added by timtempleton are such sources. More sources: http://www.cityam.com/268339/city-moves-13-july-2017-whos-switching-jobs-quiqup https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/food-drink/best-of-london/3-companies-disrupting-london-food-industry/11/07/ https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:rL2o6HB4dJoJ:scholar.google.com/+%22Quiqup%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5. Sufficient coverage per . Regards
— User:SoWhy, 17:41, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)