Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Naqvi
MathSciNet citation counts tend to be low especially in peripheral areas to mathematics (he is a physicist). The Google scholar citation counts are more respectable: 134 cites for "Rolling tachyons and decaying branes", 120 for "Giant gravitons in conformal field theory", 94 for "Space-time orbifold: A toy model for a cosmological singularity", etc. I think that's enough for a pass of #C1. As well, I think it can be helpful to be less judgemental of non-western researchers in order to counter Wikipedia's heavy western bias
— User:David, 18:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)