Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodil
I think that  may apply here.  requires significant  and , both of which are not 'plenty'. Being sponsored by the government to do anything is not a good enough reason to create a WP article. If that was the case every farmer in Europe that gets European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development|subsidies would qualify, but it would be notable if there was a press release or significant quality news coverage. I commend {{ping|Prince of Thieves}} for his work copyediting, but it still seems a bit too spammy for me. I don't see how anyone would at this moment benefit from this WP article, other than the creator. It doesn't seem objective, even after fairly extensive work for a stub
— User:Nicnote, 00:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:IS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Too soon)