Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purpleskirt
Fails  and . And Martin, please review , which states ''"Attribution is required for direct quotes and for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. Any material that is challenged and for which no source is provided may be removed by any editor."'' If these theses do exist, then the burden of citation lies with the editor who introduces the information. If this truly is a notable sociological phenomenon that has been documented in multiple sources as you claim, then it has a place in WP. Easy as that
— User:Caknuck, 22:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:RS||WP:CITE (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)