Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of calculator words
as nom. I always thought  was a dangerous thing to have lying around. I strongly feel that it should not apply in determining wether material should be included in Wikipedia mainspace articles. In this area the rules are crucial- everyone is bound to want to save there favourite unencyclopedic articles on the bases of  which just becomes  on a policy footing. These words were |dreamed up in school on many days. Sometimes such ideas can become widespread and popular amongst those of school age, but that does not make them worthy of an encyclopedia article where there content is unimportant and not notable (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common room cricket|Common room cricket for an example of a recent AfD of this sort). I think fun has its place in the Wikipedia community, but not in the article mainspace
— User:WJBscribe, 12:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:IAR||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:NFT (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)