Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engelbertha Stroebele
I have to admit I didn't do my homework on this after assisting the primary contributor to move the initial draft from his userpage to articlespace. Every single Google hit on the topic seems to lead back to the author's book, and the book itself has, as far as I can see, no significant secondary coverage. Therefore we can assume that this is |original research. It may be that the author's theory might gain some traction and recognition in the future, but for now Wikipedia is helping led credence and notability to it, which is not our role
— User:FreeRangeFrog, 19:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)