Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Performance report
as boring and unvisited as the page may be, that fact that |no one is working on it is not ipso-facto proof of non-notability nor reason to delete, as |there is no deadline for improvement. And yes, |pointing to g-hitshttp://books.google.com/books?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ei=rkd-SuDsL5KsswOozqDvCg&resnum=0&q=%22Performance%20Reports%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp is not an ipso-facto proof of notability, but as guideline allows, it might be used as a simple indicator that sources toward expansion might exist. For reason of expansion, the term is not limited to governmental usage. The subject is covered in ''http://books.google.com/books?id=chXsGln2YOkC&pg=PA145&dq=%22Performance+Reports%22&ei=tkd-Sou3O6COkAS_7qWaCg#v=onepage&q=%22Performance%20Reports%22&f=false The stage management handbook'', ''http://books.google.com/books?id=B2KCv2fx8qEC&pg=PA235&dq=%22Performance+Reports%22&ei=tkd-Sou3O6COkAS_7qWaCg#v=onepage&q=%22Performance%20Reports%22&f=false Professional Practice for Interior Designers'', ''http://books.google.com/books?id=8MxUm6lJ1JIC&pg=PA257&dq=%22Performance+Reports%22&ei=tkd-Sou3O6COkAS_7qWaCg#v=onepage&q=%22Performance%20Reports%22&f=false Financial and Business Statements'', ''http://books.google.com/books?id=WLJtZfo08DYC&pg=PA205&dq=%22Performance+Reports%22&ei=tkd-Sou3O6COkAS_7qWaCg#v=onepage&q=%22Performance%20Reports%22&f=false Schaum's outline of theory and problems of cost accounting'', ''http://books.google.com/books?id=wjhlH5-CIo8C&pg=PA170&dq=%22Performance+Reports%22&ei=tkd-Sou3O6COkAS_7qWaCg#v=onepage&q=%22Performance%20Reports%22&f=false Airman's Guide'', ''http://books.google.com/books?id=TeVQJmnq8lEC&pg=PA125&dq=%22Performance+Reports%22&ei=tkd-Sou3O6COkAS_7qWaCg#v=onepage&q=%22Performance%20Reports%22&f=false Performance measurement explained'', and literally hundreds of other books. Boring? Certainly. Expandble? Definitely. Notable? Yup. It |may take a lot of work to bring this article to Wikipedia's encyclopedic standards, but its being in need of expansion and cleanup is not a vaild reason to delete
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 04:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOEFFORT||WP:DEADLINE||WP:GHITS||WP:HEY (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)