Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Nolke
This isn't the stuff of  at all. GNG is absolutely ''not'' just "count the footnotes and keep anybody who happens to surpass an arbitrary number" — it also tests the sources for their type, their depth and the ''context'' of what they're covering the person ''for'', and does ''not'' just agnostically accept ''every'' possible "source" as contributing equally to the process of making a person notable.Podcasts and YouTube videos, for example, are not support for notability: a source has to be a real media outlet, not just any web content that exists. Q&A interviews, in which she's doing the speaking in the first person, are not support for notability: they can be used to support stray facts after a person has already cleared GNG on third-party ''analytical'' coverage, but not as prima facie support for getting her over GNG in the first place. Sources that briefly namecheck her existence in the process of ''not'' being substantively ''about'' her, such as a source that briefly alludes to her work in the process of being fundamentally a review of a film she had nothing to do with or a recipe for chicken, aren't support for notability. Minor local awards, like the "Toronto Sketchfest", are not automatic notability passes: "notable because award-nominated" goes to top-level national awards like the Canadian Screen Awards, the Emmys or the Oscars, not just every single award that exists on earth. IMDb and the self-published websites of people she's worked with, verifying that roles were had but not ''independently'' analyzing the ''significance'' of said roles, are not support for notability. And on and so forth: notability is ''not'' just automatically supported or built by just ''every'' web page that can be found to have her name present in it.And of the few sources left that actually survive all of those tests by being from real media outlets, written in the third person and substantively ''about her'', all of them are covering her in the context of a single viral video — which just makes her a , not a person who has been shown to pass  as of yet.GNG is ''not'' "as soon as a person can show n>2 examples of their name being mentioned on the web, they automatically pass GNG and are thus exempted from actually having to pass the defined notability criteria for their specific occupation" — it requires a lot more than that, and this isn't surmounting that higher bar
— User:Bearcat, 11:43, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:NACTOR (Wikipedia:Notability)