Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StorageCraft
Certainly the company has some serious investment behind it, but there isn't any intellectually independent coverage. Most of the references are company announcements or are extensively based on company announcements and fail  and/or . Of the other references, https://www.buzzfeed.com/katiebrown24/is-online-storage-right-for-your-business-339kt?utm_term=.wx7dyXKEq#.bkaE2p05w buzzfeed is not regarded as a reliable source and this post was tagged with ''This post was created by a member of BuzzFeed Community, where anyone can post awesome lists and creations.'' https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/benefits-of-software-defined-storage-for-smaller-companies_us_5a565e96e4b024fa0543b636 This huffpost reference states ''I had the honor to interview some of the executives at StorageCraft'' and since it is extensively based on interviews with company execs, it fails . http://www.esclair.com/entry/time-incorporate-disaster-recovery-service-draas-business/ This esclair.com reference fails as a reliable source since again, anybody can become a "contributor" and there's no editorial oversight. Finally, https://www.forbes.com/sites/dell/2011/11/03/success-in-the-cloud-begins-with-integration/#1d250d401930 this forbes.com article was written by an employee of Dell, partners of this company
— User:HighKing, 15:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)