Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-canonical spells in Harry Potter
Completeness? I don't think so. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of useful content, it's not a matter of "let's jam in every minor detail just so it can be complete". If it's useful and notable enough for other articles: I can see this information moved elsewhere. But if not: it just goes, and doesn't get resurrected as cruft. I know   just fine, so don't go throwing links at me
— User:RobJ1981, 18:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)