Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuk-luk
unless somebody can actually locate evidence of |reliable sources to support its notability better than this completely unreferenced article does. We would have to keep ''total hoaxes'' if merely ''saying'' "keep it source it" was all you had to do to stave off deletion — anybody could simply ''say'' that better sources are available for absolutely ''anything'' if they merely had to say it and had no responsibility to actually ''prove'' it. So we do not keep unsourced articles just because somebody ''speculates'' that better sources ''might'' exist somewhere that nobody has actually found — rather, we consider the sources that people ''show''. So if you want to save an unsourced article, then it's ''your'' job to ''find and show the sources'' it would take to make a difference
— User:Bearcat, 16:44, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)