Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Montagu, 13th Duke of Manchester
Let's look at this properly, shall we. He is not a Duke, nor is he a peer - so there's no notability from that regard. Wikipedia may be about verifiability, and not truth, but I'm pretty sure we can tell that the source made an error. Being of a notable family lineage is definitely not grounds for notability - see . The Daily Mail is not a reliable source, and I facepalmed when I saw someone referring to it as such. The AAP source is reasonably reliable, and isn't purely routine, so that's an OK source, although it is quite tabloid-esque. That said, it's for just one event. The Age (Melbourne) was a local source to the event that it describes, so doesn't construe notability. We can leave the Peerage sources aside - they're not going to show any further notability. The Daily Telegraph source is for exactly the same event as the AAP source, so that doesn't go any further towards notability. It's irrelevant that those two sources happen to mention previous convictions as well. Essentially, it's a BLP that reads like an attack page, which would be enough to remove it on its own, regardless of sourcing. The reliable, national-level coverage is centred around one event, and appears to not have been sustained. So, this article should go
— User:Lukeno94, 14:01, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)