Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Grey
While there is disagreement here, I would point out two things: First, notability is inherent in the , not our views of them or the subject of the article. Secondly, a good number of comments, on both sides of the issue, have been discussed on this discussion page (and elsewhere, when you include the talk page, Talk:Erika_Grey, individual talk pages, and even in edit comments. One overlooked point was the lack of comparability between a "physical" encyclopedia, with its inherent limitations on space, and an electronic, or online, encyclopedia. I won't reinvent the wheel, but rather refer to the already-robust discussion above, as required reading material for anyone before they aspire to vote. Also, I do find it odd that nothing has been done, even though it has been slightly over a week since the last or most-recent relisting on the 15th.Special:Contributions/96.59.177.243|96.59.177.243
— [[User talk:96.59.177.243|talk]]) — [[Special:Contributions/96.59.177.243|96.59.177.243]] ([[User talk:96.59.177.243|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added at  (UTC)., 04:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)