Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penelope Trunk (2nd nomination)
Quality of writing in an article, or lack thereof, is not grounds for deletion. If people have a problem with that, then it can be edited. Likewise, the article might be out of date because it was deleted contrary to policy in 2009 until it was recently restored. Therefore, it simply needs updating. Moreover, |notability is not temporary. It should be noted that most of the negative comments in the 2007 AfD discussion are no longer relevant. There are now lots of verifiable independent third party sources about Penelope Trunk, and she is certainly notable. She's a published author; Forbes named her site one of the top websites for women in 2011http://www.forbes.com/2011/06/23/100-best-web-sites-for-women-blogs-2011.html; she is cited in and is a contributor to several bookshttp://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&biw=1259&bih=600&q=%22penelope%20trunk%22&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=146860l150532l0l16l16l0l15l0l0l62l62l1l1&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=np; and has no shortage of Ghitshttp://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=1259&bih=600&q=%22penelope+trunk%22&oq=%22penelope+trunk%22&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=undefined&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=1344l1344l0l1l1l0l0l0l0l297l297l2-1l1. Of the press coverage of her, there were significant pieces about in the ''New York Times''http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/style/18divorce.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=penelope+trunk&st=nyt&oref=slogin and ''The Guardian''http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/nov/06/penelope-trunk-tweet-miscarriage (the topic relating to Trunk in the latter article garnered a great deal of coverage by major news outlets at the time
— User:Agent, 19:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NTEMP (Wikipedia:Notability)