Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boba Phat (2nd nomination)
as previously demonstrated both in the first AfD and above, the subject of the article clearly meets the minimum |standards for a standalone article per the notability |guideline. Once the minimum standards are met, self-published sources are |specifically allowed for and often essential for |verification of minor details. Outright deletion is still a |last resort option when there are |other things which can be done with verifiable content.That said, given http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Biohazard388 this, http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pcount/index.php?name=Biohazard388&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia this, and especially when compared against http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Biohazard388 this I have to concur with
— User:Cobaltbluetony, 17:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:SELFPUB||WP:V||WP:BEFORE||WP:MERGE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)