Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victim feminism
As an academic term at the heart of a long standing debate over what feminism should stand for, it definitely passes the . Would '''oppose merge''', because the idea is not limited to Wolf, but is tied to many other thinkers in the field. Camille Paglia, Christina Hoff Sommers, Natasha Walter, Katie Roiphe, and Rene Denfeld are listed alongisde Wolf in a non-exhaustive list in https://books.google.ca/books?id=QK3cAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA17&lpg=PA17&dq=Victim+feminism&source=bl&ots=jTWKyJQxUu&sig=MDK0hJhQVP7J-qg9hzcdLUzmqiM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiG_J7Jh43MAhUKs4MKHQU0BR44ChDoAQhaMAc#v=onepage&q=Victim%20feminism&f=false this chapter from an entire academic book studying victim feminism. Just because a term is sometimes used as a pejorative in certain forums does not mean that there cannot be an an article on the subject. A https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?start=60&q=%22victim+feminism%22&hl=en&as_sdt=1,5 Google Scholar search gives 900 results, many from the last decade, which could be a start point for someone better versed in feminism to contribute to the article
— User:Patar, 02:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)