Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional Alumni of Real Universities
WP:NOTE.  "If a '''topic''' has received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable."  Please provide links to reliable third-party sources that discuss this topic in order to demonstrate that it is notable.  Wikipedia is not a reliable third party source.  Note that the discussion is not whether Iron Man, Chuck, and/or Stanford are notable.  The discussion is whether the topic of the article, Fictional Alumni of Real Universities, is notable.  Also, .  ""Original research" is material for which no reliable source can be found. The only way you can show that your edit is not original research is to produce a reliable published source that contains that material."  In the absence of any evidence to the contrary (i.e., the discussion of this topic in reliable third party sources), I stand by my contention that the authour has taken knowledge of a variety of different notable topics, found a common thread among them, and turned that thread into a Wikipedia entry that is itself original research and not notable
— User:Rejectwater, 12:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)