Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorraine Bow
I thought about this for a good long time and I just don't see where Bow has achieved the amount of notability needed to pass  or . She did get a brief spurt of news articles about her, but has not gotten any media attention since then. The thing about "once notable, always notable" does not mean that a brief amount of news coverage will always give notability. Bow did participate on a BBC radio show and supposedly sang on a TV show, but was not the focus of either the radio or TV spots. This doesn't mean that these performances are meaningless, just that they aren't enough in and of themselves to pass . This was a tough decision because she really is thisclose to being notable, but she just hasn't crossed over from "occasionally noticed oddity" to "notable oddity". (I mean no disrespect by the usage of the term oddity.) The article's claims of her teaching or working with notable people don't give her notability either, as notability is not inherited. () I'm unfortunately not sure that her upcoming "how to play the uke" book for beginners will be enough to give her notability, as most "how to" books of any kind tend to fly under the radar, but I do encourage the article creator to look into userfying the article back to their namespace. I have no problem with them working on it until/if the point comes when she does pass 
— User:Tokyogirl79, 05:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:BIO||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:ENTERTAINER (Wikipedia:Notability)