Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kairos (journal)
After a long debate with myself, I think we ought to keep this one. The lack of indexing in selective database is a strike against notability, which is usually what we go by when we lack stronger, more direct indication of notability. But I feel that the LoC interview goes a long way towards establishing notability, because why would they have bothered to interview them if they were not worth taking note of? We also have secondary sources that did research on Kairos' impact, and while there seems to be some type of close affiliation between at least some of the researcher and the journal, there's also the fact that there's a historical aspect to the journal in that it pioneered certain webtext techniques. Taken together, I think that this journal at least meets #C3 and , even if #C1 is tenuous
— User:Headbomb, 17:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NJOURNALS||WP:GNG||WP:NJOURNALS (Wikipedia:Notability)