Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of street view services
First, I think  has been misinterpreted for the purposes of this debate.  #5 says "An article should not include product pricing or availability information unless there is an independent source and a justified reason for the mention." Neither product pricing nor availability are mentioned in List of street view services. The article does indicate that some of the maps are free and some are not, but that is different from listing specific prices.  #7 does not apply either, since many of the entries in this list do give additional context. Now to address the notability argument. I suggest there is a case for keeping this article under . https://www.tnooz.com/article/how-google-streetview-is-killing-the-competition/ How Google StreetView is killing the competition does discuss street view services as a group, namely how Google has maintained its dominance in this group. There's also this http://www.lifehacker.co.uk/2014/07/24/street-view-alternatives-great-options-nosing-around-streets list from Lifehacker, so there is sufficient coverage of alternative street view services as a group. Funny enough, Google Web Search has been impeding my efforts to save this article&mdash;I've been asked to solve three captchas while searching for sources
— User:Altamel, 04:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTDIR||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)