Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lassiter Holmes
Holmes just isn't that notable of a person. I found one local source that commented upon him being in the movie and a brief mention of him getting taken to court and disbarred for mail fraud, but none of this is enough to show notability for him. None of the sources on the article show notability either. The high school paper is considered primary and the local newspaper review of him performing in a play isn't really enough to show that the performance gives notability. Now if Holmes had received coverage in say, New York, that would count towards notability. Local reviews are pretty routine. His high school records seem to have only been notable to the school and his association with other people doesn't give any notability either. Notability is  by Holmes having known someone notable. Training a person for a pageant is not enough to give notability unless his actions received coverage in reliable sources- which it didn't. Nor are routine listings of him having been a lawyer enough to show notability either. Nobody is questioning whether or not he's been a lawyer, just his notability per Wikipedia's guidelines. I've actually tagged this for a speedy delete as sheer promotion. Even without the promotion, Holmes is not notable enough for his own page
— User:Tokyogirl79, 03:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTINHERITED (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)