Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kineti-Go
I think that the nom-statement is a little harsh, but the over-the-top protests of the clearly COI-infected article creator don't help matters.  I did find one additional source, but only the abstract is available on-line... http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/greenvilleonline/access/1777681041.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Nov+21%2C+2005&author=Kathy+Spencer-Mention&pub=The+Greenville+News&desc=%60The+Force'+is+with+local+game+company&pqatl=google  What I will say is that I would expect a ''notable'' product developed in 2005 to have enduring coverage, not two mentions in regional papers in the same year the product launched.  Since the coverage seems to be one-shot coverage and there hasn't been any mention of the product since then, I have to agree that the product seems non-notable.   seems to set a pretty high bar for product articles; I sincerely hope that nobody here thinks this is equally notable as the iPhone
— User:Livitup, 23:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PRODUCT (Wikipedia:Notability)