Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supernova (programming language)
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by .  Sources offered are all rimary (meaning, sources written by the author) or otherwise unsuitable.  Googling turns up nothing useful.  It's possible this is simply a case of oo soon and that new, more helpful sources could appear tomorrow.  But, frankly, I doubt it.  It's very difficult to imagine this going anywhere.  I don't know who would use it to do what.   is not a reason to delete but is a reason to question
— User:Msfclipper, 17:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:P||WP:T||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)