Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clint Baclawski
I'm surprised by the simple, comment-free invocations of "". The latter comes with just two concrete -looking examples: an entire book about one person, and the most fleeting mention of one band. Clearly the coverage of Baclawski cited in the article or above is far less than the former, but this is true of not just a lot of biographical articles (an observation that famously isn't a valid "keep" argument) but the ''majority'' of them. (Yes, I mean that the majority of poets, photographers, phonologists, psychologists etc that get articles here don't have books about themselves.) Clearly the coverage of Baclawski cited in the article or above is far greater than the one passing mention of "Three Blind Mice" -- and of course this is an absurdly low bar, allowing in, inter alia, just about anyone who's ever been seen on TV kicking or batting a ball
— User:JC7V7DC5768, 23:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)