Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Blacketer controversy
If (as is suggested on the article's talk page), wikipedia logs are allowable providing that use of the data does not infringe , ie is not analyzed nor interpreted but merely included as examples of the actual editing reported previously in nominally reliable sources, then surely we can't call for deletion on the grounds that the article's sources have been shown to be unreliable and hence has no reliable sources to satisfy notability and verifiability, as others have suggested here? Paradox
— User:Esowteric, 10:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)