Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (3rd nomination)
or, failing that, '''merge''' into celibacy.  The term itself is a neologism, but the current article reads as an essay by a user, assembling every source which uses the words 'involuntary' and 'celibacy' together to give the artificial appearance that the term has academic meaning.  Attaching eg. Theodore Parker's usage of the words to an essay that contains a 'contributing factors' section using Denise Donnelly's  opinions on the neologism itself as if they were talking about the same thing is ; and the entire article is essentially composed of such things.  The few meaningful sentences that could be parsed out ("sometimes people are celibate involuntarily") belong in celibacy and are not sufficient to support an independent article
— User:Aquillion, 21:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)