Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ psychosis
The term, per the article may have originated at a particular website, so it is a neologism.  Yet it is asserted to have multiple usages which evolved out of very different streams of thought.  This may become a notable neologism at some point, but as discussed above does not appear to be yet.  The current article does not, and I don't think can at this time, pass the test for  | neologisms - the references must be to  | reliable sources that have not just used the term but explained the use and and origin of the term
— User:GRBerry, 01:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)