Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Radio Falmer
as noted. It's true that this isn't |reliably sourced well enough to stand alone as an independent article topic, but it's |verifiable enough to merit a mention in the university's article — which, in fact, is precisely what  dictates for student media outlets that cannot be sourced well enough to stand alone. For a station that's been around since the 1970s and used to operate on a conventional broadcast band, I suspect that better sources actually might exist in archived media databases, so no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can dig out enough media coverage from microfilms or whatever to do better than this, but it's not exempted from having to be properly sourced just because I think better sources ''might'' exist if nobody can actually show that better sources ''do'' exist
— User:Bearcat, 14:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NMEDIA (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)