Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bistech
fails  as has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Only evident coverage is a single article in a local UK paper. Factiva search shows an Australian firm called Bistech Pty Ltd which won a minor industry award, and a Singapore Bistech which wins the occasional contract. But not clear that these are the same firm as the UK one, and in any case the coverage would still be very thin for a standalone article. Probably eligible for speedy deletion, but the tag was previously removed. Seems like no harm in having the formal discussion here
— User:Euryalus, 03:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)