Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 hour rule
I'll look for sources, but I'll be bluntly honest: NONE of the sources on the article are usable as reliable sources that show notability for this idea. A comedic article on Cracked is not considered to be something that would show absolute notability or even legitimacy for the idea. They're a known site, but not considered to be a , especially not in this context. The other sources involve pieces of movie scripts and forums, none of which are RS either. This just comes across as a lot of |original research
— User:Tokyogirl79, 05:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)