Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rejuvenation Research
Fails  and general publication standards.  Majority of sources state nothing more than the journal exists or was just introduced.  Considering that the journal seems to act as a mouthpiece for a single group as opposed to a wide scientific body or field of study and it's clearly creeping into |Fringe Theory territory
— User:Nefariousski, 22:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Notability)