Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Videogram
For somewhat more than a month, someone checking the Wikipedia for videogram got at least a somewhat useful answer. Now they won't. Even worse, even ''if'' they knew about the wiktionary ''and'' checked there, too, they wouldn't find the transwikied version because it's at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Transwiki:Videogram Transwiki:Videogram. The English WP itself has some two dozen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=videogram&fulltext=Search articles using that word, but we'd rather leave people in the dark about its meaning because of !? &ndash; I've given up on using the transwiki templates a long time ago because the process is broken, and I totally fail to see how it helps us making a better, more useful encyclopedia. I am the author of videogram, but I don't care much for the article itself
— User:Rl, 06:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:DICDEF (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)