Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bosses in The Legend of Zelda series (2nd nomination)
I would be surprised if these bosses received coverage from non-licensed publications (in other words, independent works from Nintendo).  This is the trouble with  and  information: a third party is unlikely to devote significant space to plot recapitulation so we aren't likely to see a magazine article on Gohma, for example.  We are tempted to just say "well the game received some outside attention so it must be ok to cover every level of detail using primary material" but then we get into the same mess that the independent publishers tried to avoid.  We end up with something that looks nothing like a summary of critical discussion and instead looks something like a list of bosses and weaknesses.  This isn't an accident.  It is a result of the type o coverage the material receives.  This is a case in point of why something like  exists.  A redirect to The Legend of Zelda (series) is acceptable but a merger there would clutter up an otherwise good article
— User:Protonk, 04:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PLOT||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:N (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)