Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters (3rd nomination)
I agree that the quick renomination is probably not going to result in a different outcome, as the same editors are very likely going to weigh in with the same comments as the version that just closed.  That said, I will reiterate my points in that prior discussion, which largely fall in line with this new nomination.  The list falls somewhere between a list of table of contents and a pure .  There is virtually nothing discussing this particular grouping as a whole, causing it to fail .  The two non-primary sources being used here are being used to support one statement, that monsters are "an important element" to the game.  That is not sufficient coverage for the subject matter.  While I don't have access to the German book, looking up the Ashgate Encyclopedia shows me that the entry regarding the game does not specifically talk about 2nd Edition monsters at all.  It is a brief overview of the concept of monsters in the game in general, which is a great source for a single article on the actual notable D&D monsters, which has been proposed several times in the AFDs for the other lists, but does nothing to establish any sort of independent notability for the specific concept of "AD&D 2nd Edition Monsters" that would allow it to have the notability needed for a stand alone list
— User:Rorshacma, 19:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)