Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unreleased Michael Jackson material (2nd nomination)
per : "A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources." There has been a recent wave of AfDs involving "List of unreleased (Artist X) songs/material", and in most of these instances, the topic of "unreleased (Artist X) songs" did not meet that standard. In this case, however, the topic of "unreleased Michael Jackson material" has been discussed as a group http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/michael-jackson/5717178/Michael-Jackson-left-mountain-of-unreleased-material.htmlhttp://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/music/news/2009-07-08-unreleased-jackson-music_N.htmhttp://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/michael-jackson-left-hard-drives-of-new-songs-80s-recordings-20090806http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Music/03/16/michael.jackson.deal/http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9EG0RA83.htmhttp://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/michael-jackson-s-unreleased-tracks-among-1006357352.story. If there are issues with individual songs on the list, that can be addressed at the list's talkpage.  suggests, for example, a limit on large lists so that each entry has independent notability. I don't know how practical that would be here as very few of the songs satisfy that threshold. But whatever the solution, it would seem to involve cleanup rather than deletion
— User:Gongshow, 07:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTN||WP:LISTN (Wikipedia:Notability)