Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weird Paul Petroskey
The sources seem valid and the depth of coverage seems just enough to pass the benchmark of  - barely. I must note, however, that am troubled by the appearance of a slew of IP editors, in what has the appearance of a |canvassed attempt to influence the debate with a variety of |arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
— User:Drm310, 13:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PEOPLE||WP:CANVASS||WP:ATA (Wikipedia:Notability)