Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gospel Music Association
I didn't ignore the dead links, but them being dead does factor into if there is currently existing reliable in-depth coverage of the company or not. Which is what AfDs are about. On the hundreds of entries you found, great for you. See . I said sources came up when I looked, just that they where trivial coverage or weren't otherwise reliable. Notability goes beyond just the existence of sources. If you have sources that meet 's notability standards, 100% contribute them. Without them though, this company isn't notable. Let alone should it be speedy kept just because of some Google hits
— User:Adamant1, 08:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)