Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbes Fictional 15 (3rd nomination)
Meets  with coverage across media in multiple countries.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8433739/Scrooge-McDuck-tops-Forbes-Fictional-15-wealthiest-characters.htmlhttp://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2012/04/forbes-fictional-15-richest-characters-topped-by-smaug/http://www.msnbc.com/jansing-co/chris-list-forbes-fictional-15https://www.themarysue.com/forbes-fictional-15-twilight-vampire/http://www.therichest.com/rich-list/nation/the-15-richest-fictional-characters/http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-bruce-wayne-tony-stark-christian-grey-make-it-to-the-forbes-15-richest-fictional-characters-list-1901694http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/04/25/who-is-the-richest-fictional-character/ Last nomination was 10 years ago so that doesn't count for much. An alternative would be to merge to Forbes if it had a section on the company's famous lists, but do the thing which requires the least work. No indication of  either: lists are notable if they get media coverage which this plainly does. And if fiction isn't notable or encyclopedic then why do we have approximately 1000000 articles on fictional topics
— User:Colapeninsula, 09:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)