Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1099 Pro
subject of substantial third party published materials; as an example, consider http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/37845554.html?dids=37845554:37845554&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jan+06%2C+1999&author=LAWRENCE+J.+MAGID&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Small+Business%3B+Business+Tools%3B+Tax+Software+Can+Ease+Form-Filing+Burden&pqatl=google this Los Angeles Times article.  It's easy enough to find many others with Google News or whatever you favour.  Thusly passes  - I see no reason to deviate from the usual notability standards here
— User:WilyD, 14:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)