Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyanogenMod (2nd nomination)
This debate seems to be tilting towards the deletes, and they are making a lot more cogent arguments. Most of the keepers are just railing against perceived slights by "deletistas" and iPhone "fanbois". Ugh.  And while there are also occasional mentions on more "notable" sites like androidandme.com, but I haven't seen many on independent news sites yet (though the article has an Engadget reference). So to the people arguing Delete, what I have to say to you is, the very nature of this project is why most of the discussion is still taking place primarily on forums and blog posts.  This is a grassroots and open source project known only to people with Android phones that have the courage and knowhow to alter their phone.  That's a niche.  But it is a profoundly new way for people to interact with their mobile devices.  There is nothing else like it out there among phones sold by major carriers.  It is leading the way.  Despite lack of major notable sources, the project itself is extremely notable.  While it sucks that only a relatively small niche is acquainted with the reasons why the project is so notable, you don't ''need'' to be a CyanogenMod or Android user to understand why it's important.  Give the project a chance, and allow a little more latitude in your interpretation of 
— User:Klondike, 18:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)