Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mad scientists (2nd nomination)
or fundamentally re-envision.  I'm less concerned about  here as the fact that, as it stands, this entire list is a giant collection of |original research.  A list at this title is probably possible; the core concept is unquestionably notable.  At a minimum, that will need clear references to reliable sources, preferably ones that ''discuss'' the characters as mad scientists rather than just dropping the phrase.  What is at the title currently lacks that for literally every entry.  One way or another, we cannot keep this in its current form
— User:Serpent, 21:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTDIR||WP:OR (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)