Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inconsistencies in the Star Trek canon
None of the inconsistencies are linked back to secondary sources. None of the inconsistencies are verfiable in their current form and I doubt they will be til someone starts their own page about each and everyone. There is no citation in the article other than citing the exact episode something was claimed. You have cite the literature that CLAIMS this is an inconsistency, otherwise this is original research. Is the whole article repeated by those 3 secondary sources? Surely there is a usenet faq which documents every single one of these. Currently this fails 
— User:Quirex, 21:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)