Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Perera (Old Cambrians cricketer) (2nd nomination)
per the argument put by {{u|DGG}}.  This AfD is not the place to decide about whether there is a problem with a guideline, nor a place to remove an article because it seems unlikely to go past the stub stage.  If his first class career is too short, where is the line to be drawn without starting dozens of new AfDs on edge cases?  If his sources are offline and not in English, so what?  As for the argument "fails  for clear lack of substantial, reliable third-party coverage", this depends entirely on the word "substantial".  Just about anything can be defended as not substantial enough which also invites more contentious AfDs.  Deleting this article will lead to more avoiding of the core issue in favour of fights over individual articles; keeping this will move the debate on the guideline back to the general case, where it belongs
— User:EdChem, 11:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)