Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapsiru Dainkeh
I think  is the more appropriate notability criterion for the subject's career trajectory than , despite this being listed as an academic deletion case. I found a handful of news stories quoting him, but none with the non-trivial depth of coverage required by GNG. Given the article history, protection against recreation looks like a good idea
— User:David, 21:45, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)