Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Rodriguez (2nd nomination)
Enough established sources to satisfy notability; I agree with Cirt that "link rot" is irrelevant; |Assume good faith applies that the links at one time existed and if someone wants to put in the effort they can probably replace the links with something from Archive.org, anyway. The fact the nominator interprets one of the sources as a "slam piece" is irrelevant per  and  as it's not our place to judge the nature of the source, only whether the source is real and from a reliable source. Of course, with an article like this  must be adhered to, but I don't immediately see anything here that runs afoul of that policy
— User:23skidoo, 16:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FAITH||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)