Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Woodward (psychologist)
Fails . Not a notable academic by Wikipedia standards. Number of citations on Google Scholar is low, and includes books he edited. And as Pascal Tesson points out above, editing a book is a far cry from writing a book (and there's no citations of authored books for Woodward here). Class controversy is not quite a storm in a teacup but is certainly not encyclopedically notable to justify an article on Woodward. Brief mention in the Scholars for 9/11 Truth article would be ok
— User:Bwithh, 01:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)