Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cary Lawrence
Meeting NACTOR requires |reliable sources to write content ''about'' her and her performances to establish their ''significance'', and is not just automatically passed by every actor who can ''list'' acting roles — having acting roles is literally the ''job'', so if listing roles were all it took then every actor would always clear NACTOR and the idea that it was possible to distinguish notable actors from non-notable ones at all would be dead as a doornail. Being a contributor to a magazine is not a notability freebie in the absence of ''other'' people writing content that ''analyzes'' the ''significance'' of her writing. Being president of a union chapter is not a notability freebie in the absence of ''other'' people writing content ''about'' her work in that role. And on and so forth: notability can never be supported by |primary sources like IMDb or YouTube or the credits scroll at the end of her own films or content published by directly affiliated organizations or anything on Facebook or Twitter — notability requires ''journalists'' to do ''journalism'' about her, and nobody's shown the first bit of evidence that any such thing exists at all. Notability is not about measuring the things the article ''says'', it's about measuring the quality and depth and volume of ''sourcing'' that can or can't be shown to ''support'' the things it says
— User:Bearcat, 03:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)