Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozy and Millie (2nd nomination)
no meaningful (i.e. non-trivial) secondary sources, what exists appears to fail  / , and thus serious questions exist as to its |notability. I think Sigma 7's solution of making it available for transwikiing would be good - this is a well written article suited to another publication without Wikipedia's sourcing requirements
— [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]], 00:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Verifiability)