Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JonTron (3rd nomination)
Wow, what a mess... Okay, so let's talk a little bit about notability, shall we?  What makes a person notable is '''significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources'''.  "Significant coverage" indicates that the coverage is focused on the subject, which none of the sources here are.  Because notability is not inherited, either, notability of his series, if it is, does not reflect on his individual notability for coverage.  "Reliable, third-party sources" indicates that the sources are independent of the subject and demonstrate a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight.  This is not present here, either.  Significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources is a requirement for an article to be here because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.  I'd like to remind the editors here, as well, of  in regards to a few of the arguments here.  We need to keep discussion specifically to the article at hand and the notability of the subject.  However, to those brought here by Jon's message, I'd encourage all of you to learn a little bit about Wikipedia, notability, and what good articles look like.  I'm sure any of us here who are regulars would be more than glad to teach and train new editors on the finer points of notability and article writing
— User:Red, 13:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)