Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of modernized adaptations of old works
This is clearly |original work. The definition itself of the subject is pure original-work, naturally without any supporting reference. It's an introduction to a text that's full of arbitrary, unsourced listings. Even the sources that are supposed to support inclusion are one critic's or writer's opinion, i.e. nothing fundamentally, solidly conclusive: What to one person looks like a "source" to another might look like Homage (arts)|homage or partial inspiration. This list actually operates in the opposite direction Wikipedia lists are meant to go: It confuses and misinforms rather than educate
— User:The, 17:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)