Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mama grizzly
The "fails |notability arguments" are easily refuted by the fact that there are a dozen different references that are in the article (which is just a small sampling, Google has 3/4 million articles). As for the argument that the article reads like a "List of candidates endorsed by Sarah Palin", this is an exaggeration. Yes, there is a section which lists all the Mama grizzlys, as one should expect in such an article, but there are also sections on Mama grizzly#Opposition response|how the opposition has responded to the Mama grizzlys as well as Mama grizzly#Related uses|a section for other uses. I'm not quite sure what message the nominating editor is trying to make with the statement ''"drive-by media"'' (Drive by media redirects to Media Bias, so it would be advisable for him/her to explain any perceived bias), but to say that "there is nothing to suggest that Palin's endorsements are more notable than ex-presidents, senators, etc" is contradicted by http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/palin_tracker/ this external link in the Washington Post (which is listed in the article
— User:Victor, 20:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)