Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional actors (2nd nomination)
per  and  as complement to :Category:Fictional actors. No need for "cultural impact" to be demonstrated, and we are listing article subjects by what they are. Note the nom copy and pasted the same boilerplate into at least eight separate nominations, all made at the same time. In response to TTN, whether it only includes standalone articles or not is a matter of normal editing and discussion to resolve; regardless there are clearly plenty of articles to list. Even notwithstanding , the list can be (and has been) annotated with what work(s) the character is featured in, time period, etc., so it is already demonstrating a function that the category cannot perform. We really need a compelling reason not to permit a list where we have a category ("discretion" without that turns into IDONTLIKEIT), and none have been presented
— User:Postdlf, 16:07, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN||WP:NOTDUP (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)