Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popular beat combo (2nd nomination)
The renomination is vexatious per , "''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.''"  It is counterproductive to create multiple AfD pages to try to remove an innocuous page of this sort -- this adds to the clutter rather than reducing it.  As for the supposed case against, it's quite false.  It's clear that the late Marcel Berlins put some effort in researching this and this is well-documented and sourced.  Policies which mandate that we retain this include ; ; ; 
— user:Andrew, 10:41, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DELAFD||WP:ATD||WP:CENSOR||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)