Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn K. Jones
Subject passes neither  nor . The article notes "extensive research", but lists http://books.google.com/books?id=KEtdzgAACAAJ&dq=%22Marilyn+K.+Jones%22&hl=en&ei=6_xjTofZKcnHsQLLhpSJDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA this publication, which further checking shows to be nothing more than the http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=69110&local_base=GEN01-MCG02 dissertation of a Marilyn K. Jones, except in psychology (the article does not mention such a degree, so it's unclear whether this is actually the same person). GS searching on her name seems to return many pages of false-positives and there is nothing in WoS. The above "keep" votes seem to focus on either the procedural aspect of the AfD itself, or assert the same "extensive research" without showing anything that meets . For example, the above 4 sources are all web flotsam. I would say this is an uncontroversial "delete". Thanks
— User:Agricola44, 14:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)