Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Frost (skysurfer)
just because one editor fills in a single citation doesn't mean it's no longer at autobiography. It's still an autobiography in violation of our rules. |Wikipedia is not a government agency paid for by your taxes; |nor is it a free web host, RESUME|nor a resume service, |nor a place for original research as this is. We are a charity, and if we give away our assets we risk losing our tax-exempt status by Letitia James (who just shut down the Trump Foundation and fined the POTUS $2,000,000), or being placed in some less attractive category by the IRS. If this was 2001, or 2007, or even 2014, I could understand - but this 2019. Everybody should know what Wikipedia is after 18 years; Ignorantia juris non excusat|feigned ignorance is no excuse. Just looking at the edit history and the discussion above, it's impossible to |assume good faith that he is just trying to make his activity safe Think of the children|for the children. Almost every edit posted by the created has been tagged as minor, even when it's not. This page does lacks a |neutral tone and |reliable sources, and is |extremely poorly written and coded. Not every single human being, even someone who has accomplished much, as the subject appears to have done, is |deserving of an encyclopedia article about them. Don't take it personally - Maslow's hierarchy of needs|all humans want to be immortalized but |nothing the subject has done so far is more than usual. I'm sorry, but the subject is |not yet notable, |not even close
— User:Bearian, 17:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:WEBHOST||WP:NOTRESUME||WP:OR||WP:AGF||WP:NEUTRAL||WP:RS||WP:TNT||WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:TOOSOON||WP:BARE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)