Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarcho-conservatism
If you have not studied Economics, well, then, of course you may have never heard of anarcho-conservatism.  So you may, as the OP, posit: «The topic seems to fail the », and of course be utterly, completely wrong!. But if you know your Misesian Economics (and you should!), then you immediately know where to look for this stuff.  So I've just added a bunch of citations, including from World Policy Journal, from the Mises Institute, from The Burkean, and from the book ''The Political Animal: Biology, Ethics and Politics''.{{cite book |last1=Stephen R L Clark |title=The Political Animal: Biology, Ethics and Politics |date=4 January 2002 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=1134658605 |page=89 |edition=2002 |url=https://books.google.com/?id=HF6FAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA200&lpg=PA200&dq=anarcho-conservatism#v=onepage&q=anarcho-conservatism&f=false |accessdate=20 December 2018 |quote=The fault of anarchy-conservatives, from Burke to the Agrarians, is...}}  The latter makes explicit that anarcho-conservative thought ranges from Edmund Burke to Agrarianism.  People, if this does not meet , I don't know what does.  Don't delete a political-economic school of thought just because you don't know about it.  Now as to the huge farm quote, hey, I don't it think most of it should be there, but Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup.  Deal with it some other way
— User:XavierItzm, 23:26, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)