Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous (group) (2nd nomination)
Not only does this seem to be a bad faith nomination, but the subject is ''obviously'' notable given the recent events with Scientology, which there have been more than one of, thus passing |ONEEVENT and !news.  While it's true that Wikipedia's portrayl of anon isn't entirely accurate, that is because the media coverage isn't entirely accuarate, and Wikipedia must go by those.  Until some reporter goes to /b/ and does a report on what's going on there, there isn't anything that can be done about that under the current policies and guidelines.  Furthermore, |KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED is bad, and |IAR, which is really all that is left of your nomination, in and of itself doesn't make a good argument, especially with the |IDONTLIKEIT tone
— User:Celarnor, 04:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT||WP:KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED||WP:IAR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)