Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Louisiana Historical Association (North Louisiana History nomination)
Above James500 claimed that a scholarly book had a "page or so" about this organization and a newspaper had coverage about the association, which "are not trivial." Three people changed their delete votes or cited keep based on those statements. As noted above, the 400 page book mentions the association in ONE trivial sentence. James500's statement was false. Whereas, James500 did not read the newspaper article and admitted he doesn't have access to it. All that is in Wikipedia from that single newspaper article is the association mentioned was a ''parenthetical clause'' in one sentence; as discussed in detail above. James500 opted not to cross a line through his statements, but edited them after those changes, drawing no attention to his erroneous remarks about sources despite people basing their votes on his false statements. Additionally, Unscintillating and DGG were part of the previous AFD and have not supplied any independent secondary sources that demonstrate "significant coverage" per . In the two years since its creation during an AFD for the journal that the association issues, there has been no improvement in the article or availability of sources: One sentence in a nearly 40 year old book and one parenthetical clause from a local article about the association
— User:SalHamton, 20:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)