Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Palmer (artist)
article has changed since AfD was proposed and improvements continue; the cryptic grounds for deletion in WuhWuzDat’s portmanteau neologism no longer apply. The subject clearly satisfies  as this photographer “''has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject''”. As well as the independent awards she has received, recent works have been the subject of “''multiple independent periodical articles or reviews''”, and she satisfies . The creator of the article has clarified that she is not the subject (on the :Talk:Cat_Palmer_(artist)|article’s talk page), and the initial lack of references has been addressed; work continues on the formatting of the article and the balance of subject matter. I am in no doubt that this subject satisfies Wikipedia’s criteria for inclusion, and that it can be progressively improved into an encyclopaedic article
— User:Hebrides, 11:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST (Wikipedia:Notability)