Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lost Symbol (film)
Saying that there's been no recent news, is not a valid argument for deletion. There are reliable sources, and the movie is going to happen, even if there are schedule delays. As Tokyogirl79 pointed out, there are current sources,http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Dan-Brown-Lost-Symbol-Movie-Could-Start-Pre-Production-Year-35140.html and if the ''Los Angeles Times'' is covering the story,http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-dan-brown-whats-the-film-status-of-his-last-book-the-lost-symbol-20130115,0,4604787.story that is a good argument that the film is notable enough for its own Wikipedia article. Even if we temporarily merge this film article back into the The Lost Symbol article now, we're just going to end up re-creating the film article in the future, so why go to that trouble now and make more work for ourselves? I have read the guideline at , but it's a guideline, meaning a recommendation, and not policy. We don't need to follow it absolutely. This ''Lost Symbol'' film article already exists, doesn't appear to be causing any damage to the project, the topic is notable, and has multiple reliable sources. I see no need to delete
— User:Elonka, 17:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NFF (Wikipedia:Notability)