Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fingerpoke of Doom
For your first paragraph, I guess that we'll have to agree to disagree. The truth is, regardless of whether it was or not, and whether or not you feel it is exaggerated, it has always been ''perceived'' to be the beginning of the end for WCW. You demonstrated some |research to suggest otherwise, and if you find sources for it then you should put that into the article, but the point is to the casual observer this looks like the straw that broke the camel's back, and always has. That is why it is notable, because of how it has been treated and looked at, regardless of whether or not it is true. As for your second paragraph, I was referring to conceptual correlations that can be determined only in hindsight, ie. something can only be called a pivot when you have already seen it was a pivot. I wasn't referring to the literal screwing over of a person, but that isn't important
— User:The, 13:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)