Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Waugh (2nd nomination)
Learn something every day. I have not seen Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement (VANISPAM) and can see it has sound reasoning. This AFD has become a circus of attacks and I have noticed several times where salted titles are re-created by adding a simple variation. I think when this becomes evident there should be a speedy delete option. This creative ability to hamper the Wikipedia process, effectively nullifying an reation protection|admins rights, is sometimes well-used. The protection, according to the policy: ''"This is useful for bad articles that have been deleted but repeatedly recreated."'', but seems woefully ineffective. Maybe we need an added  In my opinion a ban should be considered on an editor that barges into a Wikipedia process (especially the subject of the article), tries to steer it like a new Cadillac, and goes off the deep end against editors and Wikipedia. I would also think someone would consider sanctions against any editor that ''deletes the valid votes of other editors''. To me that is an egregious violation and personal attack. I commend editors and closers for starting to look more closely at these things
— User:Otr500, 21:25, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:C||WP:DUMPTRUCKSALT (Wikipedia:Copyrights)