Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foswiki (2nd nomination)
and '''redirect''' to TWiki, per , . I found a couple more occurrences, but wouldn't consider them enough to keep the article at the present time.http://www.linux-magazin.de/content/view/full/67810http://www.cfans.umn.edu/UndergraduateStudents/CurrentStudents/CFANSStudentNews/CFANSStudentNews-February32012/index.htmhttp://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/black-duck-honors-best-of-19000-new-open-source-projects/5655 If there were more unique content, a merge would be inappropriate, per . But having compared the two articles, some content is duplicated. Therefore, any merged content could summarise the differences/developments. A standalone article would be appropriate when more refs are available
— User:Trevj, 12:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NSOFT||WP:TOOSOON||WP:UNDUE (Wikipedia:Notability)