Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Andrews
I've looked through the sources, and despite the |huge amount of them, the best in my view that ticks all three boxes of significant, independent and reliable is http://www.tampabay.com/news/religion/north-pinellas-religion-briefs-for-july-31/2133925 this, and even then that strikes me as |routine coverage that's part of a newspaper's general announcements. As a side issue, the POV in the article is also a problem
— User:Ritchie333, 13:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BOMBARD||WP:ROUTINE (Wikipedia:Citation overkill)