Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Mahindra Holidays
Although the article contained unnecessary promotional stuff and is possibly being monitored by "sympathizers", I don't think there is any ground for deletion. It definitely satisfies  with multiple non-PR |reliable,  in publications like http://www.traveldailynews.asia/news/article/58115/mahindra-holidays-expands-geographic-footprint Travel Daily News, http://www.business-standard.com/article/pf/monetising-a-timeshare-membership-115082300851_1.html Business Standard, http://profit.ndtv.com/news/corporates/article-mahindra-holidays-unveils-new-brand-identity-to-add-1000-rooms-370210 NDTV, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/portfolio/beyond-stocks/should-you-sign-up-for-time-shares/article7596676.ece The Hindu, http://www.indiainfoline.com/article/news-sector-hotels-tourism/mahindra-holidays-ties-up-with-kidzania-116033000112_1.html more, and http://www.livemint.com/Companies/LMscfb70cC5tXIVdZyLRLI/Mahindra-Holidays-and-Resorts8217-experiment-in-timeshare.html more, and http://www.thehindu.com/2000/11/16/stories/0616000a.htm some more (print media). These are wide coverages about the company acquiring other companies, its revenues, its business models, takeovers, and other relevant stuff that is of interest to the public at large. The fact that none of these are in the article also cannot be an excuse to consider deletion. Although being listed does not make a company notable, but  can be very well cited here. I have improved the article and removed promotional stuff, so  is out I think. Finally, per , I think the article should be retained. We are building an encyclopedia here, and try to |fix the problem. Special:Contributions/1.186.37.86|1.186.37.86
— [[User talk:1.186.37.86|talk]]), 19:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP||WP:LISTED||WP:PROMO||WP:PRESERVE||WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM||WP:reliable sources||WP:independent sources (Wikipedia:Notability)