Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGB Alliance
bad procedurally to create this over a version that was draftified, yes, but that draft was probably better |TNT'd anyway. ''PinkNews'' is not great for notability even in this amount of coverage, but ''The Scotsman'', ''The Telegraph'' and ''The Independent'' all have non-trivial coverage. I wouldn't oppose a "multiple-way merge" (not sure if there's a better term) where each event being covered is incorporated into other articles and then this article is deleted e.g. Criticism of the BBC#Transphobia (not saying that section/article is in good shape...). If it's to stay then {{tq|They have been described by LGBT organizations ...}} is a terrible case of opinions not being specifically and properly attributed
— User:Bilorv, 12:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TNT (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)