Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UnrealIRCd (2nd nomination)
Why is my opinion worth any less than any other wikipedians, just because i am an expert in this field? Not to mention, the sources used by unrealircd here are the same sources used by the InspIRCd article, which was successfully deleted. Not to point out the obvious here, but if these sources were not acceptable for that article (please read its AFD page) then they are not acceptable here, either. It is plainly obvious to me that none of these ircd pages or services pages have any place on wikipedia, as none are otable
— User:Braindigitalis, 21:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)