Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAJMS
The "nom" is the "nomination" (the top four  lines of this discussion) or the "nominator" (myself). If somebody votes "per nom", it means that this person agrees with the deletion rationale presented. As far as I can see nobody here has commented upon the diversity (or lack thereof) of the editorial board, just on the fact that most people that are on the board do not even bother to mention this in their CV. Nobody here either comments on the ''quality'' of the material published in your journal, as that is not the subject of this discussion. We try to establish whether the journal is "|notable" in the sense that this is used in Wikipedia, which is independent of quality (indeed something of very low quality or a very bad person can be very notable just because of that). If your journal publishes good quality material, I am sure that in time it will get cited frequently, included in major databases, covered in |independent reliable sources, in short, become notable. However, at this point this is not yet the case and OTCRYSTAL|WP is not a crystal ball
— User:Crusio, 15:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS||WP:NOTCRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Notability)