Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddha Wild: Monk in the Hut
I spent the better part of the last fifteen minutes trying to figure out if this film was |notable or not. I started by checking on the external sources in the article. The links provided me with a couple of brief summaries and promoted the films as well. There was not anything in the external sources that could really be viewed as asserting notability. The article itself is completely unsourced, and in my opinion that is the biggest issue. If the the film was as widely shown as it was purported to be, there certainly there would be more information about it. Next,  I went online to find my own |reliable sources, and I could not find any. All I found was short blurbs or reviews. The article was created in April and we still don't have any sources five months later. As far as I'm concerned, this is a non notable film that was produced by a non notable director. Until I see evidence to the contrary, I think this should be deleted
— User:Cyrus, 16:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)