Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elchin Khalilov
The presence of scammers like the International Biographical Centre in the references and pseudoscientific organizations like the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences in the awards and honors throws the whole thing into question. And as already said, the sheer volume of puffery in this one makes it impossible to tell whether there is any actual notability hidden among all the rest. Another bad sign is the highly prolific publication claimed in the article in contrast with the low citation numbers (max=18) found by Google scholar.  The Lenin Komsomol Prize may be real (I didn't find sources to check, but I would expect them to be in Russian) but it's the only thing that looks like a legitimate honor in the article and as a junior-researcher prize it's not enough. And the nominator's accusations that the subject is using this material to peddle pseudoscience is troubling. Per , we need a mainstream scientific evaluation of his work, and obtaining that seems unlikely, but without it we have a problem with |maintaining a neutral point of view. All said, there are many bad points about this article and nothing good enough to rise to a justification for a keep, so I think it should be deleted
— User:David, 01:49, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)