Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiqup
Fails  and GNG. I've also deleted most of the article as Wikipedia is not a platform for marketing or advocacy and most of the article regurgitated routine partnership and funding announcements. Also, while {{u|TTTZZZCCC}} says above that the sources satisfies the criteria for notability, I do not know what this means. If he means that the sources themselves meet the criteria for "reliable" and "independent" sources, that may be true. But examining the sources provided in the article with the specific guidelines for sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability and especially  and  results in the straightforward conclusion that *all* of the sources provided in the article fail either one or the other and often both. This article is corporate spam and the topic fails notability criteria
— User:HighKing, 16:19, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)