Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Eisenkop (2nd nomination)
I think it's odd how there was no concern about this individual's notability ''before'' a few days ago since there was coverage to meet , but then one more event happens and ''that'' is the ''one'' even that warrants citing (ironically enough) ? The first sentence of  refutes the nominator's rationale; "Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." Saying that he was banned from Reddit and therefore will gain no additional ongoing coverage from that is ignoring the fact that notability ''is already'' established. That the nominator |thinks that no additional notability will be shown is irrelevant to that
— User:Aoidh, 20:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:NTEMP||WP:CRYSTAL (Wikipedia:Notability)