Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Hack
No argument from me, as we are in agreement that |verifiability is the key, and per policy, her work meeting  ''MUST BE'' (and '''IS''') |verifiable.  My point though was that the mandated verifiability itself need not itself be significant coverage, as WP:N and its constituent parts allow us different ways by which to determine notability other than SIGCOV.  Using due diligence, I have already added her |awards and |confirmation of such to the article. Verifiability of all can be found... all it takes is the |looking. And as I rarely just do a drive-by with my opinions, I have http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Olivia_Hack&action=historysubmit&diff=454664447&oldid=453882170 begun work and do recognize that there is more that can and will be done
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 05:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:ENT||WP:V||WP:ANYBIO||WP:V||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Verifiability)