Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerron Cross
because nothing here constitutes a notability claim that would grant an automatic pass under any of Wikipedia's inclusion standards — being a district councillor ''can'' satisfy  #3 ''if'' the article is well-sourced, but it's not a role that can confer an ''automatic'' inclusion freebie on ''every'' district councillor who exists at all if the sourcing isn't there. Of the sources ''here'', however, two are deadlinked |blogs that were ''never'' valid |reliable sources in the first place, one is a still-live blog that still isn't a reliable source because it's still a blog, one is a deadlinked |primary source, and one is his book's sales page on Amazon.com. There's only ''one'' reference here (#4) that counts for ''anything'' in the  sweepstakes — but even that reference is just a blurb in a community newspaper, so it's neither substantive enough nor widely distributed enough to carry notability as an article's ''only'' source
— User:Bearcat, 19:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:BLOGS||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCE||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)