Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fanwank (3rd nomination)
throughout this activities the article was utterly unreferenced, i.e., itself was  an example of fanwanking in times when wikipedia was rather lax about its content. Therefore any merges/splits (if any) were in fact propagation of the violation of wikipedia's the most basic rule . Moreover, it was tagged to be merged in "fanon" however this tag was removed as no consensus, and I saw no tracing of merging. I see no signs of splitting. It was restored on the basis or copyright preservation of the possibly re-used content. I don't think we must protect copyright of stuff added against basic wikipedia rules. Let them sue, and I am sure an admin will gladly restore the content into their user page
— User:Staszek, 16:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)