Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Charvet customers
WP:WAX, again, and .This is the first shirtmaker ever, 170 years old, quite a special history: worth an article in Wikipedia, which would not be complete without a development on customers. Thank you for saying "many obscure things are appropriate here". If some other are not appropriate, according to you, this can be |surmounted. You are welcome on Talk:List of Charvet customers. Please note the list is precisely not a list of rich or aristocraric customers, these have been kept to the minimum. A "customers" section was in the main article Charvet Place Vendôme. It was forked out of  for clarity. This was not my personal preference, but I admit it improves the readability of the main article. The question should rather be: '''Keep''' or '''Merge'''... or maybe '''Keep''' or '''Rename''' in view of a recent allergy to lists ;-) ... except that lists have the advantage they help minimize 
— User:Racconish, 08:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:PROBLEM||WP:OR (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)