Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional Jews
Now here is a well articulated (but whoefully flawed) delete vote so riddled with policy errors as to be scary.  Delete because its is a Coatrack (but the coats being obscured are not identified), it is original research (but the facts unattributable to reliable sources are not identified), it is synthesis (but the conclusions unattributable to reliable sources aren't identified.)  It is a ''compilation of trivia'' linked to a content guideline that says nothing about trivia. It is made up (and nicely done to boot).  And best of all, we we've deleted other articles just like it (seeming to say that therstuffexists is only valid when those who want to keep content cite other article, doesn't apply to us when we want to delete something, does it.)  This is not contest to see who can cite the most policies and guidelines. Even if you understand them (as your arguments show you don't), they need to be applicable to the article being discussed
— User:Mike, 20:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:O (Wikipedia:Orphan)