Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Sieradski
Certainly fails . No ''significant coverage'', only a couple of secondary sources which are unclear if independant of the subject. The others sources in the article are from non-RS blogs and other NN sites. Perhaps in the future if their is something notable from this person, but someone who has created a couple of blogs and worked for a news organization is not
— User:Shuki, 05:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)