Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RATE project
The sourcing seems easily to meet  with various critical papers, even though most or all are from other Creationist perspectives.  POV is very evident in the nom, which is not helpful.  This should be proposed as a merge rather than a delete, but that doesn't seem necessary to me.  I don't believe   applies at all - which heading is meant?  This has been around for some years, & is well-referenced for the area
— User:Johnbod, 16:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SOAP (Wikipedia:Notability)