Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Color of the bikeshed
It's clear that it's not a neologism (because it doesn't fit the requirement of being recently coined). It's also clear that it's notable (from the multiple '''secondary''' sources). It's also clear that it isn't original research (since those many different secondary sources '''discuss''' it, not just mention it (In fact, I find it kinda hard to imagine how one could mention the term without discussing it, especially if it was non-notable as has been asserted). This covers all of the deletion reasons. However, it does probably need to be re-titled. As the bottom of  suggests, this notable topic seems to have no accepted shorthand (the shorthand used is not recent, but does not seem to be "accepted"), so instead the title should use "a descriptive phrase in plain English, even if this makes for a somewhat long or awkward title
— User:BurnChao, 12:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)