Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ping-pong ball conundrum
per Richardcavell, with whose observation that there's nothing useful to merge I concur, and per Ultra, in view of whose observation that the ''marble'' formulation is (ostensibly) not profoundly less common as an alternative title to Balls and vase problem than the ''Ross-Littlewood'' one I can't imagine redirection to be inappropriate even as I would, were I in accord with Mukadderat's supposition as to notability, counsel deletion as against redirection, notwithstanding that certain redlinks might be created (I've never understood us to avoid deleting redirects or prospective redirects qua articles simply because we might thereby oblige ourselves to partake of a bit of housekeeping here, to-wit, removing the quasi-self-referential link from Balls and vase problem and pointing the link at Thought experiment to the instant article to Supertask or Balls and vase problem instead; I've |been bold and made such changes
— User:Jahiegel, 05:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:BB (Wikipedia:Be bold)