Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John F. Ashton
My initial delete vote was based on the lack of good sources for this article. This view was confirmed after reviewing JJB's shortlist. Put simply, none of the articles were reliable secondary sources which gave significant coverage to the subject. Some of the items on JJB's shortlist did not cover the subject at all! I agree with David Eppstein, that the problem here is our inability to identify any "core" of notability and the obfuscatory  of JJB which has wrapped this discussion in a haze confusion
— User:Salimfadhley, 18:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:WIKIPUFFERY (Wikipedia:Wikipuffery)