Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Tolkien Miscellany
As the often-cited  points out, "In categories of items with a finite number of entries where most are notable, it serves no useful purpose to endlessly argue over the notability of a minority of these items". Maintaining comprehensive, complete, well-defined sets of articles "serves the purpose of Wikipedia being a comprehensive reference." Ultimately, an encyclopedia should be encyclopedic. It is also clear that there are more than enough sources available to write a worthwhile article about the contents of the book, even if there is little specific to this particular edition. The book has been in print for nearly 20 years, and been issued by at least two different publishers. It is a very plausible search term, and if Wikipedia is being operated to provide information to its readers, rather than as an arcane game for its editors, this content should remain available
— User:Hullaballoo, 04:11, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)