Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ox Society
while some secret societies ''can'' be notable (see my reply to Phil Bridger, above), this one seems to fail . The sources currently provided are, in order: 1) a membership roster published in a borderline blog (showing that it exists, but offering nothing substantial), 2) a link to the front page of a student-run newspaper's website - no mention of Ox on that page, 3) a book describing an "Ox Head Society" from 19th century China - I'll assume good faith, and figure that this is merely the result of an Ivy League student too stupid to manage a useful Google search, rather than assume outright intent to deceit on his part - and 4) a post on a webforum. Nothing useful, and it only calls into question whether anybody in this secret society has ever ''read'' an encyclopedia, since whoever wrote this article clearly has no clue as to what constitutes an encyclopedic source. Finally, even if Ishtar21 were to follow through on his promise, the sources provided would still be primary - and ''secondary'' sources are what matters for notability
— User:Badger, 13:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)