Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Bone
at best; '''delete''' if we're really unforgiving. I cannot at this point see how ''any'' keep !votes are justified. "''He's getting a ''ton'' of coverage''". So what?  exists for a reason; so does . But for the debate, he'd be http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/14/ken-bone-s-disturbing-reddit-history-shows-he-s-not-nearly-as-adorable-as-we-thought.html just another anonymous Redditor.And ''that'' brings up another reason we should delete this: if we don't, we will have to keep debating whether to include that or not. As I type, Vanessa Bayer is on ''Saturday Night Live'' cracking jokes about exactly that disclosure. And I do not see any reason this should be allowed to follow this guy around for the rest of his life at this point. Or, more to the point, I do not want a project I very much enjoy being part of to be part of the reason he shoots himself two years from now. Not at this point in time, anyway.Put it this way: we have allowed Brian Chase (Wikipedia prankster)|Brian Chase to get on with his life; Mr. Bone deserves no less if he wishes to retreat from the limelight
— User:Daniel, 04:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:BIO1E||WP:RECENT (Wikipedia:Notability)