Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Fitzpatrick (2nd nomination)
per . It's now a stub, but topic is notable per guideline and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Fitzpatrick|judged as suitably notable at the last AFD. Is it here again because  was either overlooked, ignored, or forgotten?  As the article now belongs to Wiki and fluff was removed, giving us a nice and well-sourced stub to meet  and .  And with it being improoved, it can and should stay.  My own quick look at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Blake+Fitzpatrick%22%2C+director&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 Google News for "Blake Fitzpatrick" director, shows numerous articles about this young director... |multiple in-depth and extensive coverage in reliable sources. He has the coverage. The notability is most definitely there through, at minimum, the ''Kansas City Star'', and the ''Wichita Eagle'', and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Blake+Fitzpatrick%22%2C+filmmaker&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= lots of others
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:BEFORE||WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NEXIST (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)