Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denizen (2010 film)
I can only suppose with good faith that you somehow missed the header "CNN iReport" at the top of the page you dismiss. And to emulate your need for emphasis, per , "'''''HOW RELIABLE A SOURCE IS, AND THE BASIS FOR ITS RELIABILITY, DEPENDS ON THE CONTEXT.'''''"  Reasonable editors might see that even Wikipedia policy recognizes and accepts that a small-budget, independent film pending release might not receive the same |press as a big-budget, highly-touted, blockbuster film full of notables. This filmaker and her film have, so far, more coverage than might be expected toward meeting  through  for such, and it is |reasonable to presume that more will come with general release, not less.  Guideline allows that each might be considered for what it is... not what it is not. At the very least, |incubation might well be considered
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 16:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:ADVERT||WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:INCUBATE (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)