Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stick to Your Guns
With a staff of professional writers, Allmusic meets  quite handily, which is why they are so widely mirrored in other industry websites like billboard.com. But notability requires multiple sources; Allmusic is slightly watered down in that regard because of their willingness to receive and review ''any'' commercially available cd. (See http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=32:amg/info_pages/a_product_submissions.html their submission guideline.) They aren't selective. Metal Review looks like a really well done fansite. I don't see any sign that the staff is professional or that there's editorial control. , which is the parent guideline of , notes that "The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources." I'd consider metalreview.com a dubious source, which would mean more numbers would be helpful. Are there newspaper articles or magazine coverage that you know of? The band's name is unfortunately a common phrase, so I've come up with a ton of false hits
— User:Moonriddengirl, 12:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:MUSIC (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)