Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of diplomatic recognitions and relations of South Sudan
The main argument for keeping, as I see it, is the list of recognition dates. However, Wikipedia is not a place to store raw data. Encyclopedic content (all of the article's ''seven'' cohesive sentences concerning universal recognition and admission to the UN) is already present in Foreign relations of South Sudan#Chronology of relations.  (point 3) applies to everything else straight on. Whatever happens, just don't stuff this huge thing into "Foreign relations of South Sudan
— User:Illythr, 20:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTSTATSBOOK (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)