Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill Your Darlings (magazine)
Nominating articles for deletion because they don't meet the criteria set out in an essay is generally not a good idea, especially when you don't set out how the article fails to meet the criteria. The most relevant widely-accepted notability criteria is probably , which states that books are notable if they've been the subject of multiple and non-trivial articles, including reviews. Issues of this magazine has been reviewed at least twice in significant journals: http://overland.org.au/2010/04/review-%E2%80%93-kill-your-darlings-issue-one/comment-page-1/, http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=908568978859584;res=IELLCC, as well as in newspapers http://www.austlit.edu.au.virtual.anu.edu.au/austlit/page/C809531. In fact, if you go through the list of issues of this magazine at the Austlit database http://www.austlit.edu.au.virtual.anu.edu.au/austlit/search/page?query=%22kill+your+darlings%22&facetSampleSize=1000&facetValuesSize=10&count=50 here many of them have received serious critical reviews (Issue 1 received http://www.austlit.edu.au.virtual.anu.edu.au/austlit/page/C739755 four reviews). I think that this level of coverage is also sufficient to meet  and notability is established
— User:Nick, 10:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BK||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)