Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Derek
Two of the Delete votes were based on the supposition that a Google-hit count was used to determine notability. Nowhere above did anyone vote to keep based on number Google hits. Doing so would be counter to . Instead Google was used as a research tool to check whether this subject had any kind of notability. Evidence of notability within a specific genre, which is considered proof of notability at  was found. Wikipedia does not yet ban the use of Google as a research tool, though this AfD discussion appears to be attempting to set that precedent. The nominating editor refers to other editors as "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEpbr123&diff=117140194&oldid=117132028 nutjobs," then cites civility. His application of  appears to be just as selective and self-contradictory
— User:Dekkappai, 17:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PORNBIO||WP:PORNBIO||WP:PORNBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)