Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucio Fernandez
GNG is not just counting up the footnotes and keeping anything that passes some arbitrary number: it also takes into account factors like the ''depth'' of coverage that each source represents, the geographic ''range'' of where the sources are ''coming'' from, and the ''context'' of what the sources are covering him ''for''. Any local political figure, for example, is simply and routinely ''expected'' to be able to show some local media coverage — but local political figures are ''not'' all automatically accepted as notable, so showing the existence of some local media coverage is ''not'' a "get out of  free" card in and of itself. And local creatives are also pretty routinely expected to get some coverage in the local media too, so it takes more than just the expected local media coverage to get them over  too — some of the arts awards could be notability claims if the coverage of him in that context were going above and beyond the purely local, but none of them are so "inherently" notable as to guarantee him an article just because his ''local'' newspaper gave him some "local guy does stuff" human interest coverage. To be notable for either of those things, his reliable source coverage would have to expand considerably ''beyond'' just Union City/Hudson County (and I mean ''more'' considerably than just the other side of the Hudson River, to boot, so the two Broadway World cites aren't the magic ticket either.) But every single source here that's even attempting to go any further than spitting distance from Union City is a |primary source or a |blog. This may look like enough volume, but it ''isn't'' enough ''range or depth or context'', to get a figure of "local to a single city" notability into an international encyclopedia
— User:Bearcat, 21:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:CREATIVE||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:BLOGS (Wikipedia:Notability)