Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dual-role transvestism
because it is still a medical diagnosis, and to not have an article on a diagnosis would be unprecedented as far as I know; and also because diagnoses meet  by their very nature. Any diagnosis, after all, must have medical peer-reviewed literature describing it. I don't think NOPAGE should apply in this case, as medical conditions are best served by having their own articles, rather than being buried in an article mainly about a societal topic. All that said, though this is not a reason for deletion, the article does have room for improvement. It's not a problem if it remains short however
— User:Crossroads, 03:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)