Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger versus lion (2nd nomination)
my assessment has not changed since the last go-round. If something is covered to this extent through the ages, it passes . Contrary to what is stated above in some places, the bulk of the article (sections "Coexistence", "Observed fights", "Opinions", "Art") has little synthesis; these sources/people/artworks are commenting directly on the topic. We don't need academic papers to supply that material - {{tq|children's books, something from 1875, and two short pop pieces}} are just fine. (In fact, the main  offender is the "scientific" section (Tiger_versus_lion#Physical_and_behavioral_comparison|Physical and behavioral comparison) and IMO that would be a candidate for removal
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:SYNTH (Wikipedia:Notability)