Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worcester Students Union
Agreed the article is poorly written, but that doesn't mean the subject is not notable. See . Also, '''Comment'''. Of the other articles listed above (and I'm quite aware that they have been withdrawn from this AfD discussion), five were nominated for deletion in December 2007. Four reached no consensus and one had the result of a definite keep! It strikes of bad faith and as an attempt to keep nominating some articles until they're deleted. I can't see any evidence that this was the case here, but I'm sure you can see my concern
— User:Andymmu, 02:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POTENTIAL (Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state)