Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeCommander
I'm just not convinced the references provide "significant coverage" of the subject. One is a how-to guide from which we can't really get a lot of value (see ). It's not coverage of the subject, it's a guide for how to use the subject - that's not really the same thing. I couldn't cite a street-sign as contributing to the notability of the street it is on, just because it tells me how to use it. Others are download points, some with a brief explanation of how the product should be used. Again, very "how-to" - not "significant coverage" that objectively reviews the software. Though it is a user essay, not a policy,  gives some idea of what the Wikipedia community might expect to see for notable software. Whether you apply NSOFT or , I don't think, on balance, it passes either
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]], 02:40, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:NSOFT||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)