Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oilogosphere
The sources in there now are not "passing mentions"; in each case, the Oilogosphere is the primary subject of the article.  http://communities.canada.com/EDMONTONJOURNAL/blogs/hockey/archive/2010/03/07/oilogosphere-rules-the-internet-when-it-comes-to-oilers-commentary-at-least-according-to-google.aspx Here's a blog entry from this month from the ''Edmonton Journal'' (per : "Some newspapers host interactive columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control.").  And not that this is conclusive, but the term gets http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=oilogosphere+-%22collectively+applied%22&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= 16,200 ghits even when the search is formulated to exclude the Wikipedia article and mirrors
— User:Steve, 17:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)