Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metametaphysics
There's an ontological problem here of the kind discussed in Manley's essay: is the reference one book or a collection of articles by different authors on the topic of metametaphysics?  There is a http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001/acprof-9780199697908-chapter-5 chapter in a book by Sider on the topic. There is also a http://faculty.washington.edu/hildebrt/TylerHildebrand/PHIL401_S13_files/Metametaphysics.pdf course taught on metametaphysics at U. Washington, but I don't know if this counts toward notability. If one reads Manley's essay, looking at meta-ontology is only one way of approaching metametaphysics--epistemology and semantics play a role too. Redirecting to meta-ontology may not be the best strategy. But at any rate, a book and a chapter in another book  on the topic show multiple reliable sources and the notability of the topic according to . Except for an overlong quote and lack of multiple refs, the article, as a stub, has no serious problems. Notability and no serious problems suggest that this article be kept
— User:Mark, 22:33, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)