Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (2nd nomination)
There is no recognized, formal definition for this term. What very few book sources exist (e.g. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=whs0eudAfJIC&pg=PA303&dq=%22involuntary+celibacy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QEDMUuGHL5Sw7AamgYHACg&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22involuntary%20celibacy%22&f=false Abbott 2001, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=z55xx8_P08UC&pg=PA132&dq=%22involuntary+celibacy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QEDMUuGHL5Sw7AamgYHACg&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22involuntary%20celibacy%22&f=false Hawes 2001) use the ''phrase'' "involuntary celibacy" in discussion of celibacy in particular contexts; but "involuntary celibacy" ''as a specific reified topic'' does not exist. Using them to imply so is both |synthesis and misrepresenting the content of the sources. We shouldn't dignify this made-up term by maintaining it as a redirect
— User:Scott, 18:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:synthesis (Wikipedia:No original research)