Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of battles by casualties
I disagree that this violates SYN. Simply having a multitude of sources, some of them conflicting, does not constitute synthesis or |original research; rather, basing a conclusion off of these facts would be (thus why the header of the SYN section includes the words "that advances a position"). Merely presenting the statistics (especially in a range when the refs are inconsistant) is simply a NPOV way of presenting the facts without advancing a position. See also
— User:Bahamut0013, 11:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)