Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord North (disambiguation)
the keep arguments made are extremely weak. Empty language such as "ease of use", "useful" or "user-friendly" are not rooted in any particular policy. Per , the page is redundant. Per , the page is a potential copyright violation. I struggle to understand why one should keep a page that is only linked by one article ({{what links here|Baron North|in contrast to Baron North}}), an article whose hatnote once made it perfectly clear that for "other holders of the title" one should click ahead to Baron North, and find their way through. We must be taking our readers for fools, if we honestly think that half-duplicating pages for the sole purpose of making it "quicker to find the right person" is necessary (for those with a smaller monitor, why not scroll down
— User:Neve, 17:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:2DAB||WP:MAF (Wikipedia:Disambiguation)