Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State management (NLP)
Are any of these "numerous sources" you mention RS or are they all |books? These various articles do not seem to be about notable enough aspects NLP (already a niche topic) to deserve their own entries. There is also very little well-sourced and informative material to salvage. Some articles (Future pacing) have only single sources, usually a |business website. Most of them (NLP University, State management) are simply unsourced stubs. Some other more lengthy articles (Sleight of mouth) are context- and discussion-free lists of examples ("...most of the understanding will follow from working through examples, and seeing how these are applied..."). They do not explain the very concepts they purport to be about and WP is  a how-to manual. Finally, very few other articles link to these (or rather, they all link to each other, creating a ) and I am positive that the readership of WP would not miss them. Famousdog
— NONE, 11:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SPS||WP:PROMOTION||WP:NOT||WP:WALLEDGARDEN (Wikipedia:Verifiability)