Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spec Property
the sourcing looks to be quite impressive until you dig down and look closely at it.  As noted by those above, the majority of the sourcing here is either not from independent sources, doesn't cover the subject in detail, or is simply routine and trivial.  Reprinted press releases do not count as independent coverage.  The article is a good effort given that the author had to work with, but ultimately I don't see that this can meet 
— User:Lankiveil, 23:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)