Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heim theory (3rd nomination)
I think this may well pass  but that should not be the only consideration. Per  and  we need substantive coverage in mainstream sources, describing how this theory differs from the mainstream and why it is not accepted by mainstream physicists. Currently we only have one such source, of marginal reliability, a website maintained by a physicist (reference 31 of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heim_theory&oldid=529621281 the current version); I don't think that's enough. In addition, the proponents of the theory have trimmed back the criticism to make it look ridiculous (It hasn't been peer-reviewed? That's very far from the main point of the criticism.) rather than allowing it to be presented neutrally. I searched Google scholar for more and better mainstream sources but didn't find anything that looked usable. In the absence of enough coverage to make a properly neutral treatment of the subject, and with a significant past history of non-neutrality, I think the best option is deletion
— User:David, 17:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)