Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six Sigma Pricing
If sufficient reliable independent resources exist to demonstrate notability and provide verification, let the author show them. Otherwise this is , , , .  Basically Wikipedia is not to be used for publicity. I agree banning is overly harsh now but if the article is reposted again without sufficient references it could be considered repeated vandalism
— User:Drawn, 17:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:OR||WP:SPAM||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)