Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Album (Despina Vandi)
reasons mentioned above). I've worked on this article myself, trying to lift it up a bit, however, I never heard of the  rule. Having read that, and bearing that in mind, I can't say anything else then 'delete'. I think the next (or perhaps only) question should be: is it ging to be deleted at once, or is there going to be a timeframe? The latter gives people a chance of finding new/ more sources, and/ or perhaps Despina/ Fivos/ Spicy Effect will release some new/ more info (although I think that seems very unlikely). If the time has run out, and no additional sources/ info could be found, than I recommend saving this article's page somehow (in Word or Pages for example), and sort of here_is_no_deadline| start over again when  is not of relevance anymore. Another idea might be to Deleting_an_article#Merging| merge parts of this article in the article of Despina Vandi. But whether speedy deletion, deletion after some time, or merging the article;  is the guideline, and I think no one can deny the fact that this article fails greatly in that department
— User:Robster1983, 10:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:HAMMER||WP:T||WP:HAMMER (Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law)