Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Sidney Hyman
The https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33&q=%22Edward+S.+Hyman%22&btnG= citation record in GoogleScholar is slightly better than the above discussion indicates, but it is still rather low, with the h-index of about 9. Certainly far below of what would be needed to justify satidsfying #C1 based on citability of his work, even taking into account when most of his papers were published. Eggishorn is correct that the references cited in the article are not self-published. But they are all (every single one of the 22 references currently cited in the article) to the publications of the subject himself. Thus they are not wp:IS|independent sources and they cannot be used for justifying his notability. I am not seeing anything else that would justify passing  or  on other grounds. The article is written in a promotional tone, and reads like a tribute by a close colleague or a family member rather than a neutral third party. The biographical and personal info given in the article is currently completely unsorced and presents  problems as well
— User:Nsk92, 20:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:V (Wikipedia:Notability)