Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8514oem
I can't even see how this would be encyclopedic as a list. To address Jules' first point - dbnmpntw.dll, jgdw400.dll, and MSSTKPRP.DLL are also distributed with Windows - and let's not forget ALANA.DLL, cc3250mt.dll, and the ever-popular DartSock.dll. I would argue that while very vital to the functionality of our computers, #INFO|none of them are encyclopedic. As to the second point, "may expand" is a bit unsettling - in a few months' time, it's still equally probable that they "may expand", and a few months' time later, still just as possible. Until these fonts are as well-established in popular culture as, say, Times New Roman, or even of the same kitsch|kitschy niche as MS Comic Sans (edit: which is itself a red-link, thus only bolstering my confidence in this argument), then I see no need for their inclusion in an encyclopedia
— User:Action, 00:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)