Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge University Law Society (2nd nomination)
WP:SOFTDELETE|soft delete): Having three entries in an external links section does not references make. It seems to me that an article with no references would be a prime candidate for a speedy. I would never want to be considered a "Deletionist" (I think it is called) because I feel an article should be on Wikipedia on merit of the policies and guidelines, of which |notability is a prominent factor. Longevity is not a major reason for keep. One thing I am against is using "External links" (against policy and long consensus) to create an article and then "acting" like that is a reference or source. "IF" this article has information in an Wikipedia:External links|external links section that can be used in the article and referenced then do so or at least create a ''General reference'' section. If the article is not notable enough since 2006 to generate "some" interest, hanging around with multiple tags about references of which there are actually zero, then how notable is it? I didn't look at how long but one of the external links is even formatted wrong
— NONE, NONE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTABLE (Wikipedia:Notability)