Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wedlease
while there are 'references', I find the 'references' to be trivial blog-type references, and it fails to make a convincing case that it actually is notable; there's no lawmakers trying to push it through anywhere for example, it seems to be a purely theoretical thing. There's also no books, there's no academic journals, and the article completely lacks content. I therefore consider it fails 
— User:GliderMaven, 20:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)