Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rincon (surfspot)
World renowned surfspot.  It's not me saying that, but the ''Los Angeles Times''.http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/61212857.html?dids=61212857:61212857&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Mar+08%2C+1992&author=JEFF+MEYERS&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=Pell-Mell+IN+THE+Swell+Surfing+Traffic+at+World-Renowned+Rincon+Has+Increased+at+a+Rate+That+Alarms+Locals+and+Threatens+to+Desecrate+Site%27s+Mystique&pqatl=google.  The book "100 Best Surf Spots in the World" rates Rincon #24. http://books.google.com/books?id=NyskjBWJLQcC&pg=PA50&dq=rincon+surf&cd=10#v=onepage&q=rincon%20surf&f=false Besides the aforementioned significant LAT coverage, it has more coverage from various sources, like the book ''Surfing the World'' http://books.google.com/books?id=_HsqHQyVWpYC&pg=PA60&dq=rincon+surf&cd=6#v=onepage&q=rincon%20surf&f=false  and ''Surfer Magazine''. http://books.google.com/books?id=6_QBXXUtVNUC&pg=RA1-PA15&dq=rincon+surf&lr=&cd=18#v=onepage&q=rincon%20surf&f=false.  Before assuming an article topic is "Probably non-notable" because an editor doesn't see references or sources, the nom should always follow  and look for sources instead of nominating an article for AfD
— User:Oakshade, 20:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)