Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EduTechnoz
There's just not quite enough coverage to satisfy . Wouldn't object to '''Userfying'''/'''Draftyifying''' if the creator thinks it will receive coverage moving forward that might increase its notability. The problem with the sources is that they're almost all connected to one of the organizations involved. http://www.barakabits.com/2013/09/arabic-learning-made-fun-with-online-games-qatar-2 This looks to be a press release, for example, and many sources reprinted https://cdn.qf.com.qa/app/media/38502 this press release from the Qatar Foundation. There's some coverage of http://news.arabnet.me/silatech-ooredoo-announce-winners-arab-mobile-app-challenge/ this competition, and http://www.mitefarab.org/2013/04/diana-aldajani-of-edutechnoz-awarded-the-best-female-entrepreneur-prize-2013/ this award, but coverage is mostly limited to sources connected to the awards/involved parties, brief mentions, or are about the founder, not EduTechnoz. http://www.wamda.com/2013/09/qatar-s-edutechnoz-learning-arabic-gamification This looks pretty good, but it's not enough. Sort of in response to the comment above, interviews most definitely do contribute to notability -- if it's significant coverage, about the subject of the article (rather than the person), and conducted by an independent source. There are limits to what primary sources (like the words of the founder) can be used in the article, but a journalist/editor/publication deciding someone is noteworthy enough to interview them is the sort of thing we're looking for to assess notability (it's significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject one can be independent of the subject while interviewing them)... but there's just not enough. &mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 20:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH (Wikipedia:Notability)