Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Finnerty (2nd nomination)
I won't try to speak to the nominator's motives but the bottom line is that this article currently cites exactly zero non-trivial reliable sources about this man.  I Googled his name and I saw exactly zero non-trivial reliable sources (plenty of mentions on various partisan web pages, as well as other trivial mentions amounting to littler more than stating his name an office, but nothing both non-trivial and ) in the first couple of pages of results.  I checked on him at newslibrary.com and saw exactly zero mentions of him outside of a single paper: ''The Press of Atlantic City'' (and even in that paper, I recall only two or three articles in which mention of him is non-trivial).  This seems to indicate to me that his notability, such as it is, is entirely local.  I'll add the caveat that I didn't spend copious amounts of time looking through the Google and Newslibrary results, so it's entirely possible that I might have missed something, or there might have been something beyond those first couple of pages of each, which does better establish his notability.  But the point is that neither I nor any other reader should ''have'' to dig for the sources establishing his notability.  The burden of proof of notability is on those who want to keep.  If those folks would care to find and cite the non-trivial reliable source coverage of him (preferably from more than just ''The Press of Atlantic City''), then I think that would pretty much end the attempts to delete the article.  Without such sources being cited, the deletion nomination is entirely understandable within the assumption of good faith
— User:Mwelch, 02:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)