Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor Alexia Thomas
I'm in agreement with much of the above arguments. The degree to which, as of right now, the article needs systematic cleaning up is troubling. Still, I think that the coverage that's been cited above as well as in the article itself push things past the hurdle of . There should be more eyes on the page, yes, but it shouldn't be deleted
— User:CoffeeWithMarkets, 07:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)