Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball-pen probe
Tricky. On the one hand, that's a lot of valid sources, and apart from some over-illustration (and grammar), that's a very well-constructed article. On the other hand, the COI is strong in that one - the inventor and main page editor features in 24 of the 38 refs, and at least three others seem to be theses from their graduates; and honestly, starting an article with "X is a novel technique for..." raises immediate warning flags about . I think non-familiarity with the field prevents me from assessing this one correctly
— User:Elmidae, 07:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)