Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qi (programming language) (2nd nomination)
Okay, I followed Ruud's link at the top to peek at what the Qi community thinks of us.  Some remarks:  As explained at , we do not delete articles because of content problems; if an article's not well-written or incorrect in what it reports, that can be always be fixed by anyone willing to put in the effort.  But to have an article on Wikipedia, the topic needs to be :  Someone other than the people connected with the topic have to have decided it was sufficiently interesting that they thought about it and wrote something that got published in a reliable publication.  This is a more technical, more precise use of the term than most of us would use in ordinary conversion where, if something ''seems'' notable, that's close enough.  Here, it's not enough that an author thinks his work ''should be'' notable, it actually has to be.  It's not enough that others ''should'' take note, they actually have to do it.  If we didn't do this, we'd be overrun with spam.  Wikipedia is not a .  But this bar of notability really isn't that high.   If a couple reliable independent sources say a topic is notable, we take their word for it.  If PCWeek isn't the right place to get some coverage, how about an ACM or IEEE journal?  All it takes is a couple people not named Mark Tarver writing a couple short articles and getting them published somewhere.  My suggestion would be  the article while you go get something published
— User:Msnicki, 20:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROBLEM||WP:NOTABLE||WP:WEBHOST||WP:USERFY (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)