Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Null (scanlation)
per nom and above. Groups like this are awesome for the work they do, and lets face it, without them at lot of us who only speak English would be at a huge loss. However, even if an individual group is notable, it's hard to even say what that group is. They change people all the time, different people in the groups will claim different levels of involvement, etc etc. Lets say we even get past that we still need to reference it. As tjstrf, said it's pretty much unreferenceable. I doubt we'd be able to get Wikipedia:reliable sources|reliable sources for such an article. As  says, "''The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth.''" Other than individual reader testimony, I don't even see how we'd get past the first step I mentioned, whether or not the group is notable in the fist place (and not violate ), let alone the other hurdles
— User:Ned, 08:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:Verifiability)