Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land recycling
but suggest heavy, heavy editing to ensure it meets basic standards of |verifiability and |neutrality. Land recycling in the UK is tracked by Defra (http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/progress/regional/summaries/25.htm, http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/progress/national/25.htm), to me that is a very strong indicator that the topic is |notable. Do not redirect to Land reclamation as it appears to be an entirely different topic. As I have had to be informed in the past "not encyclopaedic" is not a good argument for deletion at |AfD as it is effectively stating "doesn't belong in the encyclopaedia because it doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia" without a true reason why
— User:Guest9999, 15:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NN||WP:AFD (Wikipedia:Verifiability)