Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New relationship energy (2nd nomination)
To here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyamory#Research.  I personally believe it is a  neologisms.  However, a small claim can be made that there has been enough coverage for otability|Notability to be established in that the term has been covered by 3rd party – reliable –creditable and verifiable sources as shown here http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22New+relationship+energy%22+NRE&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 .  While Google Scholar only shows two hits, and one an unpublished thesis as shown here http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22New+relationship+energy+%22+NRE&hl=en&lr=, there have been a few books published covering the subject, as provided here http://books.google.com/books?q=%22New+relationship+energy+%22+NRE&btnG=Search+Books.  Overall, as I mentioned above, there is enough information that someone can make a case.  However, I feel it would be better served with a '''merge/redirect''' to here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyamory#Research as it fits well in the research category of Polyamor and fleshes out the article.  Just my thoughts
— User:Shoessss, 23:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)