Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James McCown
generally following the reasoning of {{u|Smmurphy}} and {{u|Newyorkbrad}}.  I find the article informative, encyclopedic-ally written, and .  It is of interest to a relatively large set of readers.  I do not see how the encyclopedia would be improved with the deletion of this article
— User:78, 15:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)