Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of American foreign policy
WP:SYNT, |coatracked facts, arguments and conclusions not actually supported by the cited sources. My initial response was that the "Topic is notable, but the execution is flawed", and recommend stubifying... however, the POV nature of the topic title does need to be considered.  I doubt that this article could ''ever'' be anything but a POV magnet.  I strongly suspect that it was created as a POV fork, to allow mention of criticisms that were rejected from other articles.  Certainly there are lots of people who criticize US foreign policy, and much of that criticism deserves to be discussed in wikipedia... but it has to be discussed in context.  Criticism of US foreign policy needs to be disussed in articles about US foreign policy, (and criticism of specific polices should be discussed in the article about that policy
— User:Blueboar, 15:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:coatrack (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)