Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.C. Dilsaver
I've reviewed all the sources; 1&2 are self-promotional; 3 is an article about a book he wrote, probably the best source; 4&5 discuss his writings in the introduction of another book; 6 is a link to when he was on television; and 7 is a link to what appears to be a place to purchase a lecture he gave. An additional source search is largely promotional or lecture-based. I'm reviewing this as a  claim since his notability seems to be about the books he's written, and this isn't satisfied under any of the four prongs of . Simply not notable per our guidelines
— User:SportingFlyer, 22:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)