Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Sikh Holocaust 1984
point of view fork issue''' {{tl|User wikipedia/WikiDragon}} Deleting an article based on it having a point of view problems is one of the worst arguments for deletion I can think of.  Probably the very worst example of an  argument is to try and justify deleting an article based on a claim that it is a point of view fork.  This topic is notable  and verifiable  it has over 160 references some of them from very reputable and non-partisan sources.  That is not really nice of you to call the Sikhs that don't agree with Indian main stream media a fringe group, but even if they are, they are certainly a notable fringe group.  Basically a point of view fork argument is that since some allegedly non-bias other article does not provide sufficient coverage of a subject, then an in depth coverage of the same topic needs to be deleted.  Nonsense, lets stick to the issue and forget about , better yet, since you have now awakened a sleeping dragon, I am headed right over to the article you claim is so unbias, and add in all the references that people suggest should be merged into that article, and place a link to the main article on the point of view expressed by some Sikhs.  The sad thing is that this will mean that over 160 references are going to probably start to toggle in and out of that article.  At least that will thwart your plan to get this content out of wikipedia edit history, unless people next advocating that article as well. Anyway, everybody please try and calm down and have a nice day.  I believe that many of you are men of good faith who just disagree with the point of view of some of the Sikhs, but I don't think it is reasonable to exclude it.  The other good news, is that all of the named point of view problems with the article have now been fixed.  Making a sweeping claim about an article having a point of view fork problem is a fallacy under  in this case because it really does not apply when two articles are bias, and also fails by .  Also I think in an argument we need to say if we are Sikh Hindu or other.  I have been clicking and visiting a lot of user pages, and there are many Hindus or at least Indian nationals.  Me I am mostly Irish and German with some Jewish relatives as well.  I have nothing personally against either Hindus or Sikhs and did not know anything about this issue until I clicked into it because I monitor articles for deletion
— User:TeamQuaternion, 01:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERCRAP||WP:N||WP:V||WP:OTHERCRAP||WP:JUSTAPOLICY||WP:ONLYESSAY (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)