Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartAction
I'm throwing an |ignore all rules vote in on this one.  While I don't believe that this article has enough significant sources yet, it has been steadily improved since I nominated it for speedy deletion two weeks ago.  Now it reads like an encyclopedia article (well more than some I have read) and it is quite interesting in my opinion.  ROO1605 has demonstrated her/his ability to take constructive feedback and significantly improve an article...something myself and many other editors could learn from.  so while I don't believe this article will be up to standard by the time this AFD is over, I think it has the potential to be a good article...hence the  vote
— User:Coffeepusher, 02:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)