Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People speculated to have been autistic (2nd nomination)
everything is sufficiently sourced, and the "speculation" is attributed to the "speculators". Significant minority views and even fringe theories have their place on this wikipedia, and meet the standards of eutral point of view as long as we present it fairly and without bias (which means looking for reliable criticism on the subject). Not including significant minority views would actually be against POV. Besides, it doesn't take a genius to read a biography on someone's life with the diagnostic criteria at hand to, albeit informally, diagnose someone, especially with an autism spectrum disorder. If one were to divide this article into the books/reviews sourced (or by authors), each article would probably have merit on its own, although perhaps a small topic to cover. Having it all on one page is more efficient. Incorporating a criticism section sounds like the best option
— User:MichaelExe, 19:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Notability)