Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjab Juvenile Justice System Rules 2002
The points that IP raises above would be sufficient to improve the article, if and only if that information came strictly from reliable sources. My worry, though, is that IP's point is that xe could make this analysis themselves, which would constitute original research.  The very last phrase ("expanded in a scholarly manner") directly implies original research on the part of xyrself or other editors. If the article is deleted (as I think it should be unless more sources are provided to show that this law is |notable), I would be willing to take a userfied version of this temporarily and work with the IP editor to determine if the article could be expanded into a full article meeting our policies
— User:Qwyrxian, 23:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)