Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Whitfield (inventor)
WP:BIO requires significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I grant that http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/yourbusiness/brightideas/4268434/Thomas-Whitfield-The-Oxford-student-who-plans-to-make-baldness-a-thing-of-the-past.html the 2009 Telegraph article is one such source, but I can find no more (from e.g. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Thomas+Whitfield%22+oxford+OR+inventor+OR+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a this Google News search), and I don't think a single 300-word article is substantial enough to satisfy  on its own. The other refs in the article are either not independent or do not include significant coverage of him. of course the article may be recreated in the future if more such sources are published
— User:Qwfp, 20:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BASIC (Wikipedia:Notability)