Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters
I think I'll abstain from making a recommendation on this one--I recommended "delete" for the earlier nominated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters|List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters, but I'll hold off this time--but I do want to say I think you need a different reason for your nom.  I don't see how "Violates " applies or even makes sense--reading over , there's nothing there to violate; it's all about how to include lists in Wikipedia, and why they're important, and there are no guidelines there about when to ''avoid'' lists--there's nothing to violate!  (Well, there is the statement about lists being "equally subject to Wikipedia's content policies such as Verifiability, No original research, Neutral point of view, and others", but if this article violates another content policy, then ''that'' should be given as the reason for the nom.)  I'm not arguing against the nom, per se--like I said, I recommended "delete" on a related nom--I just don't think the reason given makes sense.  There may be a valid reason for deletion here, but "Violates " isn't it.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
— User:Smeazel, 13:52, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:LIST||WP:LIST||WP:LIST (Wikipedia:Lists)