Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhavika Sharma
per nom.  Does not pass . That said, I don't see anything wrong with the deprod. At the time the BLPPROD was placed there were no sources of any kind. But one source, admittedly trashy, was added that seems to verify most of the article's content so deprodding is probably OK. Besides which, letting this discussion run to a delete consensus will be quicker than closing it, re-prodding, and then waiting a whole week
— User:Reyk, 20:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NACTOR (Wikipedia:Notability)