Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Woodner Company
Per the table above, I could not find a single decent quality RS of which this company was the principal subject; zero , and a fail of .  If no material RS wanted to cover this company, why should WP?  We end up in a situation where its WP article was the major source of its notability.  There is no WP:PRESERVE here, and there are other articles on the family that can cover it.  Company is not notable enough to have it's own standalone WP article I'm afraid
— User:Britishfinance, 15:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:NCORP (Wikipedia:Notability)