Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Koranteng-Pipim
The article stretches to establish the appearance of legitimate sources (there are 32 references), but when you check them, they're all either dead links, testimony, , material from pamphlets, brochures and other ephemera, or hits to the subject's own website. In short, there's not a single  that demonstrates notability. Much of the article itself seems to be , suggesting this may be nothing more than a vanity or fan page. Respectfully
— User:Agricola44, 03:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)