Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional counties (3rd nomination)
We've already discussed this twice before and the result was '''Keep''' both times.  Starting a third discussion is vexatious per , "''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.''"  The suggested alternative of fictional location seems quite poor, having but one source and little content for such an ambitious scope.  The page in question is better established, better sourced and better structured.  If it works, don't fix it
— user:Andrew, 10:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:DELAFD (Wikipedia:Deletion policy)