Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeoGAF (4th nomination)
In most circumstances I would agree that forums are not notable, and in fact I almost nominated this myself a few months back. But then I did some research and found some decent sources, including those from G4 (channel)|G4,http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/688372/NeoGAF_Bans_Too_Human_Creator_Denis_Dyack.html The Escapist (magazine)|The Escapist, http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/80169-NeoGAF-Raises-5-600-for-Game-Charity and a very substantial article from 1UP.com http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3167513. The article details the impact the site has on the gaming industry and includes interviews with several developers and designers talking about the site, including David Jaffe, Todd Howard and Soren Johnson among others. Maybe two of those references are from smaller blog-style sites, but I'd say that three substantial sources from reputable industry outlets would meet the first criterion of , ''The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself
— User:Rwiggum, 18:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Notability)