Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bow tie wearers (4th nomination)
This article is outrageous, and rather ish.  However, the reason for keep is it's absolutely a well sourced article.  My regards to the editors who created such a thorough piece (only on Wikipedia would an article/list like this come to existence).  That being said, , no problem.  The real question here is notability.  This is a tough one because we're talking about bow ties.  As the nom mentioned, everyone wears a boe tie once in their life...right?  However, if you look at the list, it's not the fact that these people are sourced as wearing bow ties, but the individuals themselves are rather notable.  The list, simply stated, is just the medium that brought all these notable bow tie wearers together.  Some might take this as an indiscriminate collection of information.  That is not the case at all, as the excellent prose and article itself are purely about notable people wearing bow ties, which is hardly indiscriminate.  I would suggest some individuals to re-think their !vote, and take into consideration the definition of our policies , , and  when doing so.  In my opinion, these policies were written the way they were to allow articles just like this.  Besides that, this is an informative piece that makes the encyclopedia a better, more enlightening read.  My I remind people of the single most important policy when creating a great encyclopedia; 
— User:DigitalNinja, 14:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:N||WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)