Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander C. Feldman
somewhat confused about the {{reply to|Bearcat}} reasoning above because as per  we're not supposed to be making judgements based on the quality of the sources found on the page but whether sources which meet the  ''exist''. Hence I can't see how one can possibly !vote that "he's not entitled to keep ''this'' just because a better written and better sourced article ''might'' be possible" - because that is ''exactly'' what we '''are''' supposed to be assessing to determine whether the page should exist or be deleted.  As it happens, I don't believe that significant secondary sources about this guy do exist, and on that basis it should be '''delete''' - but this has nothing to do with the poverty of sources currently on the page
— User:JMWt, 21:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEXIST||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)