Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Briton (2nd nomination)
without prejudice against recreation of a redirect from the redlink if desired. As always, being leader of a minor fringe political party is not an automatic free pass over  — a person in that boat can get into Wikipedia if they can be referenced well enough to clear , but does not get a free ''exemption'' from having to have any real notability-supporting sources just because he exists. But the footnotes here are all directly affiliated |primary sources, not notability-supporting |reliable source coverage, so nothing here is getting him over GNG. He's plausible enough of a search term that a redirect probably should exist — however, if there's going to be editwarring over this, then we should delete the article and ''then'' create a redirect, rather than leaving the edit history in place ''behind'' the redirect, so that there's nothing for editwarrers to revert
— User:Bearcat, 14:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)