Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viola Wyse
While a First Nations chief may be able to qualify for an article under  #2 ("Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage") ''if'' they can actually be sourced over  for ''career'' coverage that was published ''while'' they were chief, they're not ''automatically'' entitled to have articles just because they existed. Politically speaking, they're equivalent to ''mayors'' of ''municipalities'', not to national heads of state, and thus are judged by the same inclusion or exclusion standards as mayors — and the standard for mayors is "if shown to clear GNG", ''not'' "all mayors automatically get articles because mayor, regardless of sourceability". And for sourcing, what we have here is primarily her ''paid-inclusion'' death notices in the ''classifieds'' — a type of sourcing that would exist for every single person who ever lived, ''regardless'' of their notability or lack thereof in life — and one glancing namecheck of her existence in an article, published a year and a half ''after'' her death, which isn't substantively ''about'' her. This simply is not enough sourcing to clear GNG, and nothing in the article is significant enough to ''exempt'' her from having to clear GNG
— User:Bearcat, 17:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)