Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Classic Hits
Neither online radio stations nor Part 15 operations get an automatic presumption of notability per  just for existing — they must be the ''subject'' of enough |reliable source coverage ''about'' them to clear . But that's not what the sourcing here is showing: except for ''one'' article in a radio trade magazine that's actually about Carolina Classic Hits, all of the content that's actually about CCH itself is referenced to |primary sources rather than reliable ones, while all of the other properly ''reliable'' sources are supporting a  essay about the general challenges of radio broadcasting in the 21st century while neither being ''about'' CCH nor even ''mentioning'' CCH ''at all''. This is not what it takes to make something like this eligible for a Wikipedia article — the radio trade magazine is literally the only source here that counts for anything at all toward supporting notability, and ''one'' acceptable source ''doesn't'' count for ''enough'' by itself. Also, |conflict of interest (what a shocking surprise) if you compare the creator's username to the owner's name in the article's infobox
— User:Bearcat, 19:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NMEDIA||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:COATRACK||WP:COI (Wikipedia:Notability)