Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Living
Changed my vote, see below.) Delete. I came here thinking it would be fairly easy to find good sources for a 'keep' result but I was wrong. The FDA and OSHA links are primary source reports, not sifted through a  observer. The Young Living brand has not been the subject of any in-depth coverage in non-partisan sources. Even the scientific paper has two authors who work for Young Living
— User:Binksternet, 18:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SECONDARY (Wikipedia:No original research)