Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwm (2nd nomination)
As per the previous AFD, some references, third party discussion, etc: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22dynamic+window+manager%22+dwm http://www.linux.org.ru/view-news.jsp?tag=dwm http://www.linux.com/archive/feed/62218 http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Dwm http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dwm http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dwm.  The discussions come down to whether these are significant mentions, which is, when it comes down to it, a subjective judgment.  My subjective judgment is that the Gentoo Wiki article is a significant mention which establishes notability.  If that doesn’t establish notability, there’s this http://pcworld.bg/7248 PC World article.  And, oh, I don’t use dwm, I don’t develop window managers, and I’m only here because I saw the AFD notice when net surfing.  As an aside, may I point out that http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Psychonaut&oldid=346480133 Psychonaut’s user page is an Wikipedia:Attack_page|attack page and should be deleted; see Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User_talk:Gene_Poole/attackrants, Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User_talk:Gene_Poole/genepooleisevil, and Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Gene_Poole/genepooleisevil (the pages were, in all cases, quotes of other editors saying hostile things about “Gene Poole”).  I hope that Psychonaut can no longer feel a need to attack other editors in his user page but instead |assumes good faith
— User:Samboy, 16:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)