Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goof Ball
Userspace it, and assume good faith I do not see any reason for all the |assumptions of bad faith up there.  This article ''should'' be deleted because it does not (yet?) demonstrate the topic's |notability, with independent |reliable |sources, and it is confused and fragmentary to the extent that it can plausibly said to be ONSENSE|patent nonsense as it stands.  One need not throw around words like "hoax" without strong justification (e.g. Disguised space aliens in the U.S. Congress).  Gaspan, on the assumption that you can demonstrate with third-party sources (newspaper articles, etc.) that the game is actually popularly played in several major metropolitan areas, it could actually be notable enough (perhaps as a section of a larger article rather than a separate one, but that's of little consequence), if it is actually put together as an article, and not a bunch of fragments of incompleted thoughts (e.g., I've never seen a "Rules" section that didn't mention any rules! :-).  I encourage you to copy your work so far into
— User:Gaspan, 08:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AGF||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NONSENSE (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)