Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massacre
See  #2. ''"Stubs and |imperfect articles are awaiting further development, and so the potential of the topic should be considered."'' There are entire books, works of scholarship, etc. written on the idea of a massacre. In time, as this article is given a chance for more editing and discussion, all of this should show up. Apparently, since the nomination, some information that could not be found simply in a dictionary entry has been added with sources. How much more can you expect in the future? If this article is deleted, it would have to be recreated completely from scratch. But if it is kept, it can be improved using the information and sources already in it, and this is valuable information for the article's future. You can't forget the purpose of Wikipedia. Is it to provide useful information to the public? Or is it to bicker about what belongs and what doesn't? —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/65.15.107.171|65.15.107.171
— [[User talk:65.15.107.171|talk]]), 03:55, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPERFECT (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)