Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akram Pedramnia (2nd nomination)
as not notable per  and . If she were notable as a translator, I would expect to find reviews in literary journals and interviews, https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=%22Akram%2BPedramnia%22 which I do not, and |I have looked. I found https://muse.jhu.edu/article/715591 her own discussion about her translation. "Better World Books is an online for-profit bookseller of used and new books" so https://www.betterworldbooks.com/product/detail/iranian-immigrants-to-canada-115567183X their review of their own product is not independent. Likewise, "AbeBooks is an e-commerce global online marketplace with seven websites" that is a "subsidiary of Amazon" so https://www.abebooks.com/9789936802339/Lolita-Vladimir-Nabokov-Akram-Pedramnia-9936802330/plp their review is likewise not independent. |Lots of scholars give lectures at various colleges and universities, so she fails |the prof test. There are lots of Ghits about her, but they all seem to be social media and the non-independent sources of the type I've linked. She thus fails , and more generally . The writers of her article |are no doubt well-meaning, and her translation of ''Ulysses'' might be a delight to read, but |we are not a free web host for translators. I would not object to a relisting to allow another few days for others to find sources that I might not have found or that might be in languages other than English
— User:Bearian, 16:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP||WP:BEFORE||WP:MILL||WP:PROF||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:AGF||WP:NOTWEBHOST (Wikipedia:Notability)