Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodan + Fields (2nd nomination)
The article does not obviously pass  or . In the last AFD the Forbes article was mentioned as a good source, and Forbes is a fine publication, but the Forbes article is a case study about a business strategy that happened to be used by this organization, and I would argue is less about the nature of this organization itself. The article certainly does not present this organization as being significant mostly as a model for finance practices. The other sources are mostly not about this organization. I expect articles to be apparent in meeting Wikipedia's standards and this one has too much promotional content to have anything which can be saved apparent
— User:Bluerasberry, 14:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)