Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrodiil
This conversation is frustrating as it is inevitably fractured across several of these contested AFDs. I think a more nuanced view of notability on the part of the nominator would be helpful to understand where others are coming from on this. Rigidly applying an idea of notability based on refrences would result in deleting many unquestionably notable articles and also creating many unnotable articles simply because references meeting  have been turned up. On another note the idea expressed in the rationale that the information in this article is duplicative seems manifestly bogus. Duplicative with what
— [[User talk:Dv82matt|dv82matt]], 14:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)