Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gadget Flow
This is gross  by an SPA with a COI, as well as a procedural violation.  If processes are not going to be respected, then there is no need for an article, especially when said article has failed AFC twice.   As noted above, the sources don't meet standards for depth of coverage
— User:MSJapan, 17:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)