Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Temple-Wood
1) the major sources specifically cover her not Wikipedia. (2) the major sources do have factual information that was not in the Wikimedia Blog, indicating, among other things, independent verification. (3) there are enough reliable sources with in-depth coverage to meet . (4) This is not the case of  or , this is continuous endeavor in a particular field. Kudos to
— User:Rhododendrites, 20:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTEBLP||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E (Wikipedia:Notability)