Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First 100 days of Donald Trump's presidency
There is a lot of material already, I expect there to be a lot more by the end of the hundred days, and I don't see any strong arguments for deleting it other than a desire to have less material about Donald Trump's presidency. But |Wikipedia is not paper, and we often maintain constantly updated articles of unfolding news events. As a matter of fact, one of the most valuable things for me about Wikipedia is the way it tracks unfolding news events when the regular press is spotty or stops following up. There is no particular harm in this article that I can see. If, after a hundred days or a year or four are up, there's a consensus that this material seems to have faded into importance and to have a disproportionate amount of detail, it can always be cut down and merged back in at that time. There's no need to do it now
— User:Dpbsmith, 02:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PAPER (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)