Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Independence Party
to Scottish independence. I agree that Twbanks brings up a good point there is a level of notability in that the party has recieved votes in the past and continouesto exist today and some of these sources exist apparently as secondary sources Which by definition of  satisfies that A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of secondary sources. However I was reading this http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/64742/Scottish-Independence-Party---SoA-2007---Late.pdf which seems to be their financial picture which doesnt shed a very notable view of the party and seems to be in decline. They are mentioned in a secondary link at http://independence2010.org/. I dont think the article should be deleted but a redirect merge would be approporaite as a worse case scenario if it cannot be expanded or sourced properly with enough secondary sources
— User:Ottawa4ever, 21:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)