Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) (3rd nomination)
despite the attempts at revisionist history, this article exists as a |split due to size considerations -- '''not''' as a POV fork (read the definitions).  O'Reilly generates lots of controversy.  This article went through a massive rewrite not long ago that culled out the content that doesn't meet with our inclusion guidelines -- , , , etc.  Given that the content herein meets with those policies, there is absolutely no reason that they shouldn't be included in an article about O'Reilly.  The '''only''' reason it doesn't exist in the parent article is due to size.  The only reason this article should be deleted is if all the content is put into the main biography.  Since that obviously violates the |article size guideline, it exists here.  It seems there have been a lot of knee-jerk "Criticism of == POV fork" reactions, when this just isn't the case.  //USER:Blaxthos|Blaxthos
— [[User Talk:Blaxthos|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Blaxthos|c]] ), 22:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPLIT||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:SIZE (Wikipedia:Splitting)