Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Gerard
Ok. First smack Doc with a trout for writing this article. More seriously I'm seeing a few mentions in the press  but I'm not seeing any about David. He does not as of yet appear to meet (it is arguable that he does but I'm not seeing it strongly). There are instead a handful of occasions (maybe two handfuls?) of David being quoted or referred to. Being quoted a lot isn't generally enough for that.  Seth's call for keeping seems |pointy especially given that Seth is much more  notable than David (sorry David). While obviously having actual articles on major Wikipedians would likely help them see some of the more serious problems we have with BLPs this is not a good reason to modify our inclusion criteria. Finally a procedural note: There are two other people with similar names to David at the top of the page. If this debate does end up favoring deletion we should instead just keep the page as a dab page
— User:JoshuaZ, 23:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Notability)