Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dungeons & Dragons Starter Set
On the one hand, this article seems well written and sourced (I didn't read the whole thing or actually look at the specific cited sources, I skimmed the article and looked at the source list at the bottom of the page).  On the other hand, it isn't about a specific starter set, but rather about D&D starter sets in general.  I think that deleting this article is the wrong response to its failings.  If, after combing through the sources we find that there are not multiple, non-trivial, independent, reliable sources about any one version(and we determine that there are unlikely to be more), we might move this article and its content to Starter Set (which might instead end up being a disambiguation with the article ending up on Starter Set (Roleplaying game supplement).  I think that we would need to have at least one of the specific supplements be able to meet  by itself before we can have an article about starter sets in D&D specifically. Alternatively, if each version passes , then we can use  and make a list of starter sets with individual articles about ones that have received more press
— User:Rockphed, 14:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:SNOWFLAKE (Wikipedia:Notability)