Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Dunin 3
as article creator).  Life's too short to deal with griefers, let's just delete.  Back when I was a new editor in early 2006, I created this article about my father in good faith, about an individual that I felt meets . He was born to Polish nobility, was involved with the launch of a historic satellite, and helped with the cracking of a famous code. After I created this article, per Wikipedia guidelines I asked an uninvolved editor to review it, and they gave it a thumbs up. Now, if I would have just created the article and then never edited Wikipedia after that, it probably never would have been a problem.  But because I am an active Wikipedia editor, it seems that some other editors are using this article about my father as a constant target as a way to seek revenge against me for other disagreements on Wikipedia.  I've seen editors come in and systematically dismantle the article, removing a sentence here, a paragraph there (yes, even removing sourced information) until they get it down to a stub, and nominate it for deletion again.  My 70-year-old father (who really has led a remarkable life and has already overcome incredible odds at even surviving the chaos of World War II) truly doesn't deserve this kind of constant harassment.  And to be honest, the information about him doesn't ''have'' to be on Wikipedia.  I've already got the information in multiple other places on my elonka.com website. If Wikipedia wants to "lose" the data, well, fine, it's Wikipedia's loss (shrug).  Let's leave my dad in peace, delete this article, and just move on
— User:Elonka, 01:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Notability)