Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Initial D characters and teams
Strictly speaking, the "too much detail" argument doesn't warrant deletion, despite the fact that it's an accurate assessment of the article.  As a rule of thumb list pages like this exist to provide relevant information that is too voluminous to fit in the main article page.  It's certainly got some serious issues in its current form, but if someone would like to |be bold and fix the article, that would really be the best course of action.  Deleting an article that addresses a notable topic or appropriately supplements another article on a notable topic because it is written poorly is somewhat of a nuclear option that should be reserved until some attempts to fix the issue have been made.   Any statements about the series can be sourced at least to an episode or publication volume, and extreneous information can be removed easily enough. If attempting to fix the article proves to render it unencyclopedic or no longer useful/notable, I would agree with removal at that point but insofar it appears that no attempt at cleaning up some of the issues above have been maintained or even raised on the article's talk page
— User:Oni, 20:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BOLD (Wikipedia:Be bold)