Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Aronowitz bibliography
Clearly not in keeping with the spirit of  (and  broadly).  Reading the proposal and the first few responses, I thought this might be a tough call--until I actually looked at the article.  Clearly having this kind of indiscriminate collection of details on the publications of every mid-tier academic would be blatantly against longstanding community consensus on these matters; we only have lists that are even semi-comprehensive for the absolute giants of research and academics, and even then, only because their entire repertoire of work can be proven to be notable by way of secondary works which discuss them.  This is a very different situation here; I'm sure this academic has his proponents, but I doubt he and his books are themselves the topic of enough sources to justify listing hundreds of his articles and books, especially given that, looking at Stanley Aronowitz|his main article, I notice it is almost entirely (and thus inappropriately) sourced to  references.  Borderline  on this one for me
— User:Snow, 08:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTEVERYTHING||WP:WWIN||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)