Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mythology of Lost
Not to evoke , but I'm a primary contributor on another Abrams show's mythology page Mythology of Fringe, and from what I know there, most of those elements can be commented on by secondary sources to augment the primary-work discussion (some already are). Given that Lost was a much more popular show (at least in the first few seasons), as well as having a companion guide, I would be reasonably expect that more sources - about how the mythology elements were conceived and how they were received - should be doable- the article already has several.  That said, the nom arguments amount to issues with cleanup, even if it has been sitting for several years, which is never a reason to delete an article. A merge might be possible, but I don't see where it could go (the main Lost page is too long for any more detail).  Note that I would expect #PLOT to be considered for the overall article, but not necessarily for every single element in the mythos; currently the article is maybe a little heavy in plot over out-of-universe function but its nowhere close to a point I would consider deletion before cleanup
— User:Masem, 20:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OSE||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)