Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designism
While I haven't had enough depth in philosophy to know if this has any serious academic supporters, I recognize the structure as being an academic approach to the idea) and I support delete because any measure of notability I can personally check shows it as unnotable, but I'd still like to point out that sometimes wikipedia editors are too quick to say "no google=no go" In my own field(computer science) I've seen things that were the among subjects of courses that I've had to take that would fail the internet tests of notability... although I could be overdoing the  for this article
— User:Ikanreed, 15:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Assume good faith)