Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dănuț Marcu
for intractable  problems regarding plagiarism because multiple reliable mainstream sources don't indicate he's notable for that reason, and I think this borderline-at-best BLP will remain problematic indefinitely. (Correct me if I'm wrong. And I insert "mainstream" for the magnitude and import of the label "plagiarist"). There may be individuals who are notable plagiarists, notable hoax perpetrators, and notable scammers, but even if it were true, I think we're still far from that threshold here. That said, the reliability of scholarly results has been called seriously into question. I'm impressed with the Google Scholar results, but given this subject's specialty and assuming there's some question as to any credit, I take issue with the reliability of the citation numbers and index. That said, where's the genuine biographical coverage?  criteria are secondary, not the be-all-end-all; the truly encyclopedically notable will have a modicum of solid biographical coverage out there
— User:JFHJr, 03:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLP||WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)