Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheReportOfTheWeek (2nd nomination)
Harizotoh9's first two sources both satisfy , as does the Forbes source cited in the article, at least in my opinion, so I am in disagreement with people who think the GNG is not satisfied. Also, I have looked at the essay Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube/Notability, which is not actually official Wikipedia policy but an essay regarding notability for YouTubers but it does give helpful guidance to deletion discussions involving people primarily known for their YouTube videos. According to it,  is something that is generally considered to need to be satisfied regarding YouTube personalities, even though nobody has brought up  before. I think having 1.1 million subscribers just barely fulfills the 2nd criterion of , “Has a large fan base or a significant 'cult' following”. Earlier I thought that number was rather low in 2018 and I would have set the bar for “large fan base” at between 2 million and 5 million subscribers, but I looked up at the statistics again after seeing EditorE’s reply, such as the numbers at List of most-subscribed YouTube channels among other things, and decided to move the arbitrary cutoff point for “large fan base” down to be EXACTLY 1 million, so with 1.1 million subscribers, this channel meets that criterion. I suppose maybe we ought to try and come to some kind of consensus regarding what exact number of YouTube subscribers constitutes a “large fan base” per , since no number is specified in that policy. I would suggest standardizing it at exactly 1 million subscribers in the case of YouTube personalities, after considering the reply EditorE made below which led me to reconsider my original vote, which was to Delete on the basis of 1.1 million not being a high enough number
— User:Yetisyny, 06:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:ENT||WP:ENT||WP:ENT (Wikipedia:Notability)