Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Adamescu
per nom. Half the sources, such as they are, deal with the subject's father. The other half are mostly editorials and position papers. Alexander may deserve a line or two in the article on Dan, but nothing really suggests he's independently notable. Anyway, the article as it stands is fatally flawed, an endless screed against the Romanian government, so  applies
— User:Biruitorul, 21:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BLOWITUP (Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over)