Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucking bar
LOL-- LOL-- LOL--, sorry! Strong keep as payback? That's a good one, and one of the better of rationale. I love Wikipedia. There is this little |policy that apparently is not important, or over-looked (I hope the later), that Wikipedia is #DICTIONARY|not a dictionary. Maybe Wikipedia:Significant coverage not required|significant coverage is not really required. We can |"ignore the rules" because it will help Wikipedia somehow, or |mothball the 29 words as a redirect until such time as we have enough for a full-blown article. The "I'm pissed at you so keep" expended more words in the first line and there are five more lines. On a more serious note Rivet gun would be the more suited place for coverage but with only 29 words and such passion I think we could just |blank-and-redirect
— User:Otr500, 04:26, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:NOT||WP:IGNORE||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT||WP:policy (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)