Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Steigerwald
You have got to be kidding me... We have zero relevant information about this person. How can we be an encyclopedia if we have a biographical article with no biographical content? Basically, we can say she was 15 in July 2005 (but we can't verify that information) and she has a grandma... The article contains pure speculation like "It is rumored that she, like Dave MacPherson, will receive special privileges like invitations to special events or even a life-time pass." and complete Disney public-relations junk like "Madison Steigerwald is significant to Disneyland's history because she is considered to be first person in line for the next generation of Disneyland visitors." Now of course, we could clean all of that up and make sure the article conforms to our policies on |verifiability, |reliable sources (which would exclude the Disney public relations stuff), |WP not a soapbox and so on. What would be left? Nothing. A two line article with zero encyclopedic value. How can we expect Wikipedia to be taken seriously when we allow ourselves to be free space for the Disney marketing machine
— User:Pascal, 16:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)