Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Marsh
I have added references that show he is one of the significant contributors to what is essentially the bible of Social Work undergraduates. Thus, he passes . He is also extremely notable within his field; I'm looking for a source for this right now.  This would also pass him on .  Also, Google Scholars gives a substantial amount of material that he has authored himself or contributed to, which is another criteria for .  I'm sure that the nominator is acting in good faith, but I think it's about time people start improving articles rather than deleting them
— User:Celarnor, 20:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)