Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shredder Company
per . Industry periodicals are usually not sufficient to prove notability, in my view, since they are rarely entirely reliable and independent. I'm not seeing any sign of extensive coverage. Indeed, a number of the cites in this article appear to be based primarily on press releases (bir.org and some of the 'recycling today' ones) or are simply summaries of industry events/statistics ('scrap beat'). More than half of them are from the same source (recycling today), which is ok, but tends to speak against a decent breadth of independent coverage. The isri one seems to only mention the company in passing as part of a list of names. Overall, I just don't see that it's enough to establish notability or importance
— User:Korruski, 14:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)