Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharlin Class Warcruiser
or '''Delete''', the article fails to establish the topic's notability per , which requires "''significant coverage (and not trivial mentions)'' from reliable independent sources". The new sources added to the article sure are reliable and independent, but do not go beyond short, trivial mentions of the topic within plot summaries and do not provide significant coverage based on |out-of-universe information such as origin, development, influence or reception, without which it is impossible to build an encyclopedic article that goes beyond a mere plot summary, per . Some of the ''keep'' !votes are entirely based on a rejection of the  policy and as such should be discarded, per , AfD isn't the place to debate policy but to check whether articles meet policy or not
— User:Folken, 17:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:PASI||WP:NOTPLOT||WP:NOTPLOT||WP:AFDFORMAT (Wikipedia:Notability)