Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old School Nickelodeon
While that is certainly criteria for ''deletion'', it is not criteria for ''speedy deletion,'' which is what you recommended. |Nonsense as a criterion for speedy deletion implies an article that is complete gibberish and completely incomprehensible by any method of interpretation, which this article is not. A lack of sources is criteria for ''deletion'', but not speedy deletion. Furthermore, |fancruft, in and of itself, is not criteria for deletion. As I stated, I do recommend deletion unless someone comes forward with more reliable sources before this discussion is closed
— User:JMyrleFuller, 14:30, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PN||WP:FANCRUFT (Wikipedia:Patent nonsense)