Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheryl Nields
I agree with MB's assessment on notability: the sources aren't in depth and don't demosntrate why the subject is significant. Even if it is a GNG pass, it is borderline. Additionally, GNG is only part of , the other part is the requirement that it pass the policy of OT. OTSPAM is relevant here. The article creator is a declared paid editor, which is fine under the WMF terms of use. It does not mean, however, that we aren't able to enforce local policy here. The editor created the page on a non-notable to borderline notable at best creative because they were specifically paid to create a Wikipedia article that would be indexed by Google. Their name makes it clear that they are a marketing person and they have declared that they were paid for this reason. While this might be okay under the TOU it is quite clearly a violation of NOTSPAM by any reasonable definition of the term promotionalism and seals the deal on deletion
— User:TonyBallioni, 16:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:NOTSPAM (Wikipedia:Notability)