Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science of morality
or '''Merge''' with ''The Moral Landscape''. I somewhat agree with William Connolley that there is a tilt in the article skewed towards Harris's point of view. But I don't think that is a reason to wipe out the article; rather, |balance should be restored. This is a tough philosophical subject and I think Tesseract deserves credit for working hard on this article. It needs more references and a good copyedit. It's an important topic in the media, essentially a debate between two prominent thinkers -- and that's what I think this article should focus on: their debate. Focus on this; and we'll achieve |neutrality. The first paragraph captures this; but later sections tilt in favor of Harris. But these issues (imo) are best solved by working on it, adding references, copyediting, and seeking out the help of knowledgeable people like Pfhorrest (sp?) and others here -- they've done an excellent job on the Rights article and many others
— User:Tomwsulcer, 14:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BALANCE||WP:NEUTRAL (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)