Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Person, woman, man, camera, TV
I think that many of the Delete arguments are based on  and .  talks about tabloid-esque magazines like ''People'' and ''Us Weekly''; it is not meant to negate coverage from CBS News, ''The New York Times'', ''The Baltimore Sun'' and ''Rolling Stone''. Stepping back from the "I find it funny/I think it's dreck" feelings, I think a key area of dispute is whether this will have lasting significance in the campaign over the next several months. I don't believe that that question is answerable right now; people are making predictions about news cycles that are yet to come. Given that, I think that the most sensible answer is to keep the article, and revisit the conversation in a few months. If it's deleted and turns out to be notable, then it would be hard to come back and recreate it with a Delete consensus on the books
— User:Toughpigs, 17:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:FART (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)