Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places blurred out on Google Maps
It seems many people want to make the argument that one can simply go and see the "source" and therefore there is no need for |attribution. The flaw in that argument is that although you may be able to "see for yourself " there is no unambiguous definition of blurred. Obviously, this is not JUST a list of "blurred" places because it would need to include all the other places that are blurred because of low-res photography, reflections, clouds, etc. It seem this list wants to be a list of "intentionally blurred" places, and that unfortunately requires original research. I love the idea of this list, but I just do not see how it fits within the restraints of wikipedia policy
— User:Ektar, 20:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:A (Wikipedia:Attribution)