Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluxx goals (2nd nomination)
as no valid reason has been given for deletion. There is no policy or guideline that says that the failure by "someone" to perform a merge is a reason for deletion. No editor has any more or less ability or responsibilty to perform the merge than any other, so if an editor is concerned that a merge hasn't happened then the solution is simply |to do it, not to renominate the article for deletion. I am concerned that the :Template:Afd-mergeto appears to encourage editors to renominate in this way. If anyone else has any opinion about the wording (either for or against) then I would encourage them to join the discussion at Template talk:Afd-mergeto
— User:Phil, 21:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BOLD (Wikipedia:Be bold)