Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle (company)
preferably speedily, per {{U|Kudpung}}'s emerging BOGO philosophy nicely articulated above, {{U|DGG}}'s emerging NOT STARTUP philosophy, as well as his "lack of notability is not the '''only''' reason for deletion" stated elsewhere (my emphasis). WP articles shouldn't be a way for paid actors to start a crummy PR fluff piece and have volunteers finish it in order to promote a company and its execs. I've been over this ground many, many times at COIN and it just takes time away from adding WP content. As an independent and sufficient rationale, the article is three sentences long and shows little prospect for growing meaningfully – that is beyond mentioning money moving from one bank account to another – until and unless this startup actually produces something; therefore 
— User:Brianhe, 05:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)