Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toddlercon (2nd nomination)
I'm seeing some comments saying "I don't think it is a likely search term", "I've personally never used the term nor seen it used in anime websites, and I tend to visit a lot of them", and even "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toddlercon_(2nd_nomination)&diff=702362536&oldid=702354924 Wikipedia is no place for this twisted stuff". These are all based on subjective opinion based on personal anecdotes. Unfortunately, extreme sexual deviancy is a part of this world, and Wikipedia has no moral responsibility to keep this stuff off the site (). Alsee has provided at least three sources that shows the existence of the term and phenomenon, and I have seen no counterargument to discount them yet (except an erroneous claim that the PDFs are blank
— User:Underbar, 06:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NOTCENSORED (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)