Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Configure One
Despite the comments by the Keep !voters above, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. {{u|Michael Powerhouse}} argues that the coverage in the ''Illinois Business Daily'' article seems significantly in-depth to him. That article relies entirely on quotations from Preston Stewart who is the company's Business Development manager, therefore the article is not intellectually independent and fails . {{u|Allison Jean Paully}} !votes to Keep and provides the reason that it has "been covered significantly by at least one reliable source that's independent of the subject. That's the definition of Notability." No, that it wrong on two counts. The first is that *two* sources must be cited. The second is that being covered by a reliable source that's independent of the subject is one half of that criteria - the other half is that the contents must be intellectually independent. None of the references are intellectually independent and they fails 
— User:HighKing, 17:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)