Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harini Iyengar
Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable for the purposes of guaranteeing her a Wikipedia article just because she exists — people do not clear  just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win; people do not clear  just because their own writing technically metaverifies its own existence; and on and so forth. Most of the footnotes here are |primary sources that do not count as support for notability at all — for example, appearing as an interview guest on the news is not a notability claim if your source for that is a video clip of the appearance itself, and people are not notable as lawyers just because they have a staff profile on the self-published websites of their own law firm. And the few sources that actually meet our |reliable source requirements aren't enough to get her over  either: they're all either routine coverage of the election itself, or glancing namechecks of her existence as a giver of soundbite in articles whose principal subjects are other things or people. So she's not notable as a politician, but this is not demonstrating that she clears the bar for other reasons either
— User:Bearcat, 14:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOL||WP:AUTHOR||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)