Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death watch beetle (Dungeons & Dragons)
and '''Redirect''' per Bushranger and others above. Hell, I think we could have made a good argument that it shoudl be '''Speedy''' as well, as these were merely restorations of previously removed content per the decisions of prior AFDs. These are all relatively minor beasties in D&D, and the all fail  by a wide margin. All sources are primary and trivial in the sense that they don't discuss importance or overall impact or anything, just in-game info. There's not one bit of anything to justify their existence as standalone Wikipedia articles. The deletion is necessary to prevent merely reverting back to the old versions, and the fact that this came back in such a controversial way is proof of that necessity
— User:DreamGuy, 17:35, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)