Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maheshwara Engineering College
No reasonable, competent editor could call this "a straightforward A3". It's not "only links to the college's website". It's an infobox, albeit a not-quite-perfect one.  says, plain as day, without any ambiguity, "''this criterion does not cover a page having only an infobox''". If Bazj doesn't understand that, they lack the basic  to be applying speedy deletion tags. (And if they do understand it, why would they not only apply the tag but double down on the obvious error?) It's also clear that G11 doesn't apply; the infobox is standard form and its content appears entirely appropriate. Note also, very importantly, that this was the first attempt at article creation by an very inexperienced editor. All of their previous contributions were constructively and reasonably intended. So we have a well-intentioned, reasonably capable new editor who's just beginning to write their first article, does a pretty good job in their first step, and is inexplicably |BITTEN by an experience editor who blithers in, tag-bombs the article with obviously inappropriate deletion tags without doing any of the most basic things that  requires. And, unsurprisingly, the new editor is driven away. '''Fourteen minutes after beginning to write their first article, barely five minutes after their second edit of it, and for no reason other than the sheer carelessness and officiousness of an experienced editor who really should know better and is unwilling to admit and correct their most obvious error.''' The new editor ought to have a reasonable opportunity to return and complete their work. And that's much longer than the four whole goddam minutes Bazj so generously allowed after I posted to the article creator's talk page encouraging them to resume writing their first article
— User:Hullaballoo, 18:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:A3||WP:COMPETENCE||WP:BITE||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)