Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meryle Secrest
no legitimate argument for deletion has been made.  The subject clearly meets the |notability guidelines for people and |Wikipedia is not censored.  The claim that the article previously contained inaccuracies is regrettable, but as per the nom these inaccuracies have been corrected; not surprising considering that articles on living people are subject to exceptional care as per |wikipedia policy on articles about living persons.  In essence, the fact that the article previously had errors is no reason to call for deletion; nor does the subject of an accurate article have any standing to ask for its removal within Wikipedia policy
— User:Locke9k, 20:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:LIVE (Wikipedia:Notability)