Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nova Roma (2nd nomination)
This subject fails  requirements, namely substantial coverage in reliable third party sources. Looking into the cites that exist, I agree with the nominator's careful if not overly detailed analysis of the sourcing concerns. This subject also fails  notability guidelines as an organization because of the paucity of in-depth coverage in . MsBatfish's comment above is essentially a form of . Several others above are essentially , and should also be discounted
— User:JFHJr, 02:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:BASIC||WP:ORG||WP:RS||WP:LOTSOFSOURCES||WP:ILIKEIT (Wikipedia:Notability)