Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Patrick
I am offended, on so many levels, that this file is nominated not only for deletion but is tagged as a hoax. What part of  was done here? If one doesn't even understand naming conventions of women, how can one assess a file for anything? First, a simple look at "scholar" shows she is publishing with Bruce Ames (BN Ames). Would he be assessed as a hoax? Would he likely be jointly publishing with someone who was? Clearly the sourcing on the files establishes notability. ''The Telegraph'', "Patrick and Ames, both well-respected scientists in the field of autism"; the ''Boston Globe'', "work by Ames and Patrick is significant". Are you questioning the reliability of the San Francisco Chronicle, the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute, etc.? Does this sound like the woman is a hoax? http://body.io/body-io-fm-15-dr-rhonda-patrick/ - unsigned comment was by
— User:SusunW, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion)