Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Weitz
Fails ,  and most importantly . All of the in depth sources are too closely connected to the subject, and therefore building an article based in quality RS is not really possible. With no independent reviews on his publications, no independent biographical sources, etc. it’s a clear delete for me. Further, think tanks often produce publications with clear biases and political agendas, and lack the integrity and oversight that happens in academic research, so I fundamentally have a problem with applying NPROF to anyone employed by a think tank without significant independent coverage
— User:4meter4, 06:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR||WP: SIGCOV (Wikipedia:Notability)