Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Berg Komt Er
I'm not sure whether referring to the deletion history on the Dutch Wiki is relevant in this case. From the discussion history :nl:Wikipedia:Te_verwijderen_pagina%27s/Toegevoegd_20110831|here and :nl:Wikipedia:Te_beoordelen_pagina%27s/Toegevoegd_20130819|here, it seems their entire discussion was whether the article was 'encyclopedia worthy' (also referred to there as 'relevant'). However, a reading of :nl:Wikipedia:Relevantie|Wikipedia:Relevantie and its :nl:Overleg_Wikipedia:Relevantie|talk page reveal that the Dutch WP:REL (upon which the entire discussion is based) is a ''de facto''-guideline, serving a similar purpose to our |notability requirement, but the precise guidelines are much less clearly defined on the Dutch wiki. Based on their 'relevance'/'encyclopedia worthyness' guideline, the discussion about "Die Berg Komt Er" on the Dutch wiki revolved around whether coverage of the event by (reputable) (inter)national news sources for a non-insignificant period, followed up by feasibility studies, were sufficient to merit an article on the Dutch wiki
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)