Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hohenzollern impostors
Hohenzollern illegitimate descendants, conditioning that  violations remain under control. When reading the essence of the article, I don't find anything notable. It's an ''exciting'' story, indeed, but hardly notable. Even though they aren't biological descendants, their ancestor Anders Fosse claimed to be one. This might defend inclusion, either in the article or elsewhere on Wikipedia. A problem is that Anders Fosse's alleged claim is known through his grandson only: the same person who initiated everything. I find it problematic that Anders Fosse's alleged claim lacks his own words, instead relying on a grandson who retrospectively has shown self-interest in claiming Hohenzollern descent. Without accusing anyone of anything, attributing  a claim to a deceased person is not an historically unknown way of backing contemporary personal ambitions, and it's also easier to assert something uncomfortable or controversial via a proxy. This is not an obvious keep but a weakest possible keep, and if the article is deleted, it will probably not be missed by many, cf. a total lack of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Hohenzollern_impostors internal references on Wikipedia
— User:Nick, 20:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)