Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikitribune
One section above  we have  which explicitly says that {{xt|"once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage."}} This is the case here, as demonstrated by 47.222.203.135 above. One should also note that  explicitly says that brief bursts of coverage ''may'' not sufficiently demonstrate notability; this indicates that even this part of the guideline accepts that there are enough cases where is may be enough. Also, if the nominator's interpretation were correct, we couldn't have any articles on current events; yet, we do and we even have a |notability guideline for them which even says |don't rush to delete articles. So all in all this is actually really a case of . On a side note, per  this should definitely be redirected/merged to Jimmy's article if it actually weren't a notable topic so deletion would ''never'' be the correct way to handle it. Regards
— User:SoWhy, 19:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NEVENT||WP:RAPID||WP:SNOW||WP:ATD (Wikipedia:Notability)