Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noynoying
I may be living outside the Philippines, but I do follow the news back home, and it seems that the local media is making a big deal out of this "Noynoying" phenomenon.  Add onto that international media coverage and I'm inclined to believe that this much more than just being a "meme".  However, while I must agree with Obsidian Soul that we should allow the term to run its course to ascertain whether or not it stands the test of time, I am not inclined to believe that time ought to be the sole determinant of whether or not an article warrants including in Wikipedia.  By the looks of it, it does pass the muster of the |general notability guideline, regardless of who invented the term or not.  If there's a problem with association, we ought to clean it up rather than remove it hook, line and sinker: hence the provisional keep. (Also, on another note: I'm seeing an unusually high number of anonymous IPs who are behaving as if they're experienced Wikipedia editors.  Please start |assuming good faith and allow the AfD to run its course.  Thanks
— User:Sky, 21:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:AGF (Wikipedia:Notability)