Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unusual eBay listings
I'm a sucker for these type of lists as , but non policy, personal opinion aside, this clearly fails our guidelines for an article. What contributes to be "unusual" in this case? As far as it stands this fails  and  as unusual is as vague of a term as it can get. Someone random news website thinking that an ebay auction is "unusual" doesn't mean it is as in almost all of these cases, the auctions are created by people trying to make a quick buck by attracting attention to themselves, which  and  applies for this. News sources love covering that stuff, but that doesn't mean it's encyclopedic, and thinking something is unusual is original research at it's finest. If anything using that term makes the list unmaintainable as well. The secondary sources argument is badly misapplied here, and the rest is I like it/interesting comments
— User:Secret, 08:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)