Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thornberry Animal Sanctuary
I agree that the ''nobility'' of an organization's mission should be of no significance to its ''notability'' for the purpose of WP inclusion. However, I would argue that the referenced third-party coverage is not "trivial" as defined in #Primary criterion. Three of the pieces are specifically about the organization and its founder; and two others illustrate the sanctuary's local and even regional impact. The founder also received national recognition. In general, there is no requirement that ''all'' information in an article be referenced to independent sources; for non-controversial, factual details (history, facilities, etc.)  says that using primary sources, such as the organization's website, is OK. If the veracity of such information is challenged, it should of course be substantiated or removed; but I don't think this is a significant problem in the current version
— User:Hqb, 10:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG (Wikipedia:Notability)