Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badboy Lifestyle
As Chaser points out, the burden of proof is on the article to assert its own notability.  Yet the article does so, and it has references from http://loaded.co.uk Loaded (UK) magazine, and http://www.thewest.com.au/ The West Australian.  Now the burden is on those proposing deletion to show that these sources are somehow inadequate.  This has not been done; Chaser has not even acknowledged that these citations exist.  I think it passes .  There are two non-trivial sources cited that are independent of the company itself.  There are also more references to the company, but they tend to in European languages I don't speak, so I can't go find them.  For example, there was an article in Playboy (Germany
— User:SecondSight, 00:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CORP (Wikipedia:Notability)