Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Linford
this is a bad Promo article of an Associate Prof. that uses primary sources and fails  and . The patents I found and the contribution to a 1996 Cambridge University paper (http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8046658&fileId=S1946427400206349 here) could be promising if there was an expert who could discern if the subject has made some kind of unique discovery or impact but those alone aren't enough
— User:EBY3221, 14:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)