Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip R. Bjork
as notability had been asserted and sourced and the subject of the BLP passes . And I did not opine until after having a hand in improving the article. WIth respects to Deor, that I might be a part of the "|usual ARS crew" does not mean I have some sort of kneejerk response to opining a keep, as I actually do what I can to improve the encyclopedia. There's no need to wait for a non-ARS input if the concerns of the nominator have so heartily been addressed that even the nominator has withdrawn.  Again and with respects, that suggestion seems to indicate that editors belonging to ARS are somehow second-class citizens and that their opinions do not matter
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 19:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:ARS (Wikipedia:Notability)