Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Loy
I am friends with Brendan. That does not change the fact that almost none of the anonymous IPs (and new accounts) that have commented here have presented a valid, detailed argument against keeping (by addressing the relevant policies and guidelines). ''You'' may not think the subject is notable, but Wikipedia has two established notability guidelines ( & ); I have detailed above 4 criteria from these two guidelines that the article appears to meet. I believe I've objectively come to my "keep" vote and properly supported my conclusion. Additionally, while Brendan Loy has been (in my opinion) overly zealous in defending his honor here, there have been several specious and demonstrably false claims made in support of deletion. I honestly wonder where all these anon IPs and new accounts with no Wikipedia edit history are coming from. Please stick to the facts, make sounds arguments, and avoid |personal attacks
— User:Scientizzle, 18:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:WEB||WP:NPA (Wikipedia:Notability)