Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivory carved tusk depicting Buddha life stories
there seems to be plenty of coverage, though there doesn't seem to be an accepted English-language name for the piece which means nailing down coverage is a little harder. It is, however, mentioned in http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-07-05/delhi/40391445_1_jade-ivory-gallery this article as one of the museum's feature pieces highlighted when the museum reopened in 2013. http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/decorative-arts-gallery-at-national-museum-reopened/article4888462.ece This article mentions it in the same way but includes a photo of it as the article's feature image. It's mentioned twice in http://millenniumpost.in/NewsContent.aspx?NID=31911 this article about the reopening. It has also received coverage in http://books.google.com.au/books?id=WP5tAAAAMAAJ&q this book. Again, coverage-locating is more difficult in this instance because nobody seems to have agreed on a name but that also suggests there should be quite a few sources in |non-English sources given its apparent national significance. There's also a matter of it, as an art work, being of national significance enough so that it has been featured in an internationally-regarded National Museum. An artwork with that level of importance is probably notable, regardless of coverage. Placement like that in a museum like that is, effectively, significant coverage in my view - the Museum being a reliable source of information with regard to artworks of national significance
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 07:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOENG (Wikipedia:Verifiability)