Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Today (Australian & New Zealand website)
Notability aside, when I accepted the article during the |Articles for Creation process, I presumed there was significant coverage based upon the claims it had and the 3 sources it does have. According to , it should be presumed that a subject is notable when it has significant coverage. Is 3 reliable sources good enough? After all, the only reason the significant coverage is required is so that the information within the article can be verified. In my opinion, yes. HOWEVER! The 3 sources are not considered reliable, as they are trivial, simple mentions that do not meet |the requirements. I'll continue to check and will give a !vote soon
— User:Michaelzeng7, 19:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AFC||WP:GNG||WP:NWEB (Wikipedia:Articles for creation)