Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selam Ahderom (3rd nomination)
Even though the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selam Ahderom (second nomination)|previous AfD was quite some time ago and the concept of notability has now become much more formal, the previous verdict still seems baffling, e.g. "keep" arguments like "Precedent schmecedent" and Special:Contributions/Optiv|SPA voting. I think that if you look at the actual merits of this case, it's an uncontroversial delete. This individual works as a lecturer, but holds no notable position, nor has earned any notable recognition per . The most common way of passing the notability hurdle, research impact ( #1), is a complete bust here. WoS shows 6 papers, h-index = 2, and a grand total of 26 citations. Bear in mind that this person's specialty is Electrical engineering|EE, so the publication record, such as it is, is well-represented by WoS. Page is also an orphan. The fact that it has extremely low views probably is what allowed it to fly under the radar for so long. Should probably be salted too for 2 reasons: (1) current version was Special:Contributions/AfricanEditor|SPA-recreated and thus likely to be resurrected yet again if deleted, and (2) given the above observations, it is extremely unlikely this individual will ''become'' notable anytime in the near future. Again, an uncontroversial delete. Respectfully
— User:Agricola44, 15:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PROF||WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability)