Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Faraci
to Pizza Pops. No prejudice against recreation if someone puts in the work to find more evidence of ''sustained'' |reliable source coverage about him to get him over  — in the database I've got, he gets just ''one'' hit apart from the "Paul Faraci has died" blip itself, so I'm not the angel of salvation here — but a person doesn't automatically qualify for a standalone article ''just'' because his death occasions obituaries. And that's ''especially'' true when ''two'' of the five obituaries are reprints of the ''same'' wire service article, and thus combine as ''one'' reference per |citation overkill rules. He's a plausible enough search term that we should retain it as a redirect to the thing he's known for — but the sourcing here just isn't good enough to earn him a standalone article as a separate topic, and even the ''content'' is mainly about the ''product'' apart from his birth and death dates
— User:Bearcat, 19:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:REFBOMB (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)