Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Erhard vs. Columbia Broadcasting System (2nd nomination)
then, per MLKLewis. I've gone back over the article with MLKLewis's response in mind, and found several instances where, at the very least, the wording is problematic for . As long as the case gets relatively significant treatment in the main Werner Erhard article, I see no reason why the case should be kept as a separate article
— User:Jorgath, 07:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)