Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Wayland
While I agree that removing unencyclopedic content would leave next to nothing in the article (and it definitely needs rewriting), I don't think that's grounds for deletion; however, I have my doubts about her notability.  I'm not seeing any claim that she satisfies , but I'm not sure whether the three interviews cited demonstrate notability or not.  I'm not seeing any guideline saying they do, so I'm thinking they don't.  (This, I think, is a case that demonstrates the weaknesses of the Google test; I'm not wading through 66,000 porn sites to try and find reliable sources, especially considering that she doesn't get any GNews hits
— User:Anturiaethwr, 23:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:PORNBIO (Wikipedia:Notability)