Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Irrational Atheist
The reason given by the nominator is spurious, and looks suspiciously like a Y attack on other editors. Also, whether the nominator considers the book "excellent" and "powerfully written" is beside the point. The point is, does the book fulfil the criteria specified in ? I reckon not. It's been reviewed in a couple of religious blogs, but there is no evidence that it has been "the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works..." Where are the |reliable sources reviewing the book? Where has it been noticed other than by a narrow-minded clique of like-minded people
— User:Snalwibma, 17:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:POINT||WP:NB||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)