Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelia Chase Brant
1.   is typically not so useful for assessing notability of someone who worked in the first half of the 20th century.  That probably leaves GNG; note that sources are harder to find on someone active in the pre-internet age.  2.  A sensible alternative to deletion might be a redirect to a stub on the book (biography) by her daughter, which appears to be possibly notable: there's a review in Kirkus https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/a/john-gassner-2/dream-within-her-hand-the-life-of-cornelia-chas/, and a short summary in this book https://archive.org/stream/chaff-bib_w21w872_532-reduced/chaff-bib_w21w872_532-reduced_djvu.txt, which I take as being of roughly similar weight to a review.  Given the difficulty of finding sources for a book published in 1940, I think this might be enough for 
— User:Russ, 08:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPROF||WP:NBOOK (Wikipedia:Notability)