Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIR Faizabad
and/or '''redirect'''. Broadcasting does not work in all countries the same way it works in Canada or the United States — in the vast majority of countries, radio and television networks do not have ''any'' such thing as local "affiliates" that originate any local programming separately from the parent network, but rather they operate ''exclusively'' as a single national service with a bunch of rebroadcasters that have ''no'' local programming variations. North American broadcasting is the ''exception'', not the rule, to how broadcast networks operate in most countries. So the notability test is not passed just by ''saying'' the ''word'' "affiliate" — it's passed by ''showing'' |reliable source ''evidence'' that the station ''actually'' originates some local programming. But there's no evidence of that being shown here at all. I'm not an expert in how to figure that out when it comes to India, but that's precisely why the claim has to be ''sourced'', and not just ''asserted'' as ''possible'', before it actually becomes valid grounds for an article about a radio transmitter — we've had ''lots'' of articles attempted about radio "stations" that ''don't'' meet that criteria, but actually exist solely as rebroadcasters of other services or networks, so proof that a radio station actually passes that condition has to be ''shown'' and not just ''presumed''. NMEDIA most certainly does ''not'' exempt a media outlet from having to be properly ''referenced'' to be considered notable
— User:Bearcat, 18:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)