Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pi delta kappa
I think there's been some confusion over the text. When tagged, in its original revision), and currently, the article specified ''three'' chapters; rather than one chapter per the deletion proposal. Since the nom opens using this as its basis for the article deletion, the discrepancy is significant. The confusion continues with the claim the article's referencing the group's coverage in Baird's Manual was inserted "in order to add Baird's as a source". It follows with a false analogy of a phone directory. Presumably this was to relate it to notability discussion on negligible otability#cite_ref-5|listing coverage. (The nominator changed the original text of 'phone directory' http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pi_delta_kappa&diff=254546616&oldid=254546204 diff to Thomas_Register - a directory; Baird's Baird's_manual|own entry clearly instructs it is neither
— [[User talk:Whitehorse1|Whitehorse1]], 00:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)