Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complextro
without prejudice to recreation when more sources have written about the genre. Usage of a term in a few places is not enough to justify there being a Wikipedia article about it.  Complextro certainly appears to be a genuine genre, albeit a relatively modern one, but with little or no documentation out ther in reliable sources to describe it, it would be hard to write an article that lives up to our standards.  Looking for reliable sources, I see little more than a number of articles describing artists who perform it, but without providing much insight into what it is, along with some press-release-inspired articles about a company who has released a collection of samples for use in its production.  If it were not for http://www.ssgmusic.com/porter-robinson-at-the-roseland-theater-612/ this source (which has been published since this AFD began) I would be wholeheartedly in favour of deletion.  This one, however, does confirm at least some of the information in the article (i.e. that Porter Robinson coined the phrase), and could therefore be the start of a useful article.  I don't think it's enough, however.  The mentions of complextro in all of these articles are, unfortunately, trivial: they just catalogue that a particular artist performs it, or mention that the artist coined the term, or in the case of the one highlighted by MelanieN above devote a few sentences to describing it.  And  requires non-trivial sources, which, frankly, aren't out there
— User:JulesH, 14:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)