Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog poop girl (4th nomination)
If you read  (which multiple people are claiming as a reason to delete this article) it states that a biographical article should not be created for a person who is notable for a single event. Rather, it states that you should "cover the event, not the person". '''That is being done here.''' This article is not about the person, it does not even name her or give any information about the person other than information relevant to the event itself, the article is about the event that took place and the consequences of such event (this is explicitly stated in the introduction). Since this is not a biographical article any suggestions of deletion based on  are as invalid as deleting the NASCAR article for the same reasons. Aside from that, the article is shown to be |notable by citing |reliable sources that |verify what is in the article. It was a mistake to nominate this article for deletion in the first place. Perhaps a merge to the article on Internet vigilantism (if '''all''' information is preserved without expanding that article too far), but there hasn't been a single viable justification for a deletion given yet
— User:Atama, 20:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons)