Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. v Evans and McDonald
The primary question here seems to be  of coverage, and I can understand why some editors feel that that bar isn't met--we wouldn't usually count a cluster of articles at the time of a crime and another at sentencing time as "persistent", and rightly so. However, the Twitter-related arrests, and their likely continuing is another matter. That, while recent, includes some coverage of this case past the routine. Perhaps to put it more clearly, when the Home Secretary gives quotes to the media to discuss the social implications of a side-effect of a case, some degree of lasting  and notability has been, in my view, evidenced
— User:Joe, 15:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:EFFECT (Wikipedia:Notability)