Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Plett
The article is an obvious , and has little on the subject herself - those who have edited the article seem to have expended little effort in attempting to find any either - or if they have, they have failed.  seems thus to apply. If it was established that the subject ''were'' notable, the single event that seems to have led to the article creation would seemingly merit little weight in any case. It belongs instead in Criticism of the BBC, as noted above. In response to the posting by 87.86.118.227, above, I'd point out that over the years Wikipedia policy regarding biographies has been changing, and what may have been acceptable in the past may not now be so. I'm sure both journalists are creditable professionals, but that in itself may not establish 'notability' by current Wikipedia standards
— User:AndyTheGrump, 02:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:COATRACK||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Coatrack articles)