Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberBerkut
Why would we need to know more about the group itself beyond that its actions (and therefore the group) is the subject of significant coverage in many reliable sources? Easily passes  with the sources already cited and I'm finding a whole lot more. Also keep in mind the many sources not in English. Just a few that weren't already included in the article: http://www.magyarhirlap.hu/tamad-a-cyberberkut Magyar Hirlap Online, http://www.globalresearch.ca/unconfirmed-destruction-of-electronic-system-of-ukraines-central-election-commission-cyberberkut/5383568 GlobalResearch, http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/65204/nato-web-sites-are-under-attack-201465204/ Lithuania Tribune, http://inserbia.info/today/2014/03/ukraine-cyberberkut-hackers-takes-down-nato-websites/ inSerbia, http://guardianlv.com/2014/05/cyberberkut-attempt-to-alter-ukrainian-election/ Guardian Liberty Voice... these were in the first couple pages of ghits. This is an easy keep as far as I can see. --&mdash
— User:Rhododendrites, 04:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)