Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Politics in America
While the existence of reviews on face is ''not'' sufficient to meet , the number of or depth existing reviews can change things.  The review in ''Environmental History'' is four pages long and delves into the book in a significant fashion.  I wouldn't call the book widely cited, but it appears to have had some impact.  as for the publisher, while publication by UK would easily make the work reliable, it doesn't make it notable.  I am, however, inclined to offer the benefit of the doubt to the article
— User:Protonk, 04:05, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NB (Wikipedia:Notability)