Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (3rd nomination)
If it were a question only of notability, I would recommend keeping, since it easily passes |GNG. For acceptable sources, the guidelines for |news organizations is more relevant here than the one on scholarship. The article is discussing biographical details, not the science, and there are articles from reputable news sources supporting them. For example, the Maclean's article is ample evidence for autism. You won't find a scientific paper analyzing a particular individual; I'm pretty sure that would violate ethics guidelines. However, I think that {{mention|CBM|p=}} is right that  trumps notability here
— User:RockMagnetist, 01:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:NEWSORG||WP:BLP1E (Wikipedia:Notability)