Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benford's law of controversy
to Gregory Benford. This "law" has no |independent, credible sources demonstrating that it has |notability. We don't actually have to OT#DIR|maintain a directory of every "law" FT|someone thought up one day, even if they're famous. In those cases, it's easy; they have an article, so mention the "law" there. (I'm not fond of the scare quotes, btw, but I wonder if there's a word akin to wikt:protologism|protologism for these -- wikt:aphorism|aphorism is close, but an imprecise match
— User:Dhartung, 13:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:NFT (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)