Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Book of Enoch
no redirect.  This would appear to be  in respect to the claims there is an additional "Lost Book of Enoch" different from existing, known works attributed to Enoch.  None of the links provided suggest that anyone has a serious, scholarly opinion that there is an additional "Lost Book of Enoch" that is different than 1 Enoch.  Claiming that because Enoch 1 is pseudepigraphal and thus cannot be this so-called "Lost Book of Enoch" is a straw-man argument.  Regardless of the true authorship of Enoch 1, the author of Jude apparently accepted it as scriptural and referenced it in his work; not surprising if taken in the historical context of when Jude was written.  A discussion of whether or or not there is an additional Book of Enoch that differs from 1 Enoch, 2 Enoch, or 3 Enoch is a disscussion for a forum or message board, not a Wikipedia article.  I would say redirect to 1 Enoch but since this was http://www.heaven.net.nz/writings/enoch.htm found in 1773, the title would be a misnomer
— User:Isotope23, 13:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)