Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distance e-Learning (Philippines)
it doesn't really matter who "pioneered" it - for it to be considered |notable enough for inclusion here, the concept itself must have received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. A number of the new users here should have a quick read of . Dumping a brand new 60,000 byte article into Wikipedia isn't a great idea at the best of times, even worse an idea when there's a Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Distance e-Learning (Philippines)|AFC submission that hasn't been submitted (from the looks of it). There is nothing to indicate anyone has previously created (or tried to create) an article at Distance eLearning (without "Philippines" on the end). Can anyone demonstrate (in 2-3 sources) that the concept itself is notable? Not different, not unique, not interesting... |notable
— [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']], 23:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:SPA||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)