Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1906 (film) (5th nomination)
per both |policy and |guideline. Continued coverage, perhaps specially due to its setbacks, which has allowed this one to be one of those very |few allowed exceptions to  in that ''|the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines'' and through its meeting the inclusion criteria of WP:CRYSTAL's ''|All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced'' and in its otherwise surpassing the instructions per 's ''|If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article.'' We CAN speak about this topic somewhere, and  instructs that we do not require something that had|enough coverage in the past to somehow remain in the news or have continued and ongoing coverage.  As for IMDb page on this project not being updated... so what? We're not IMDb. We do not demand nor expect ongoing and continued editing of any article, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1906 (film) (3rd nomination)|once notability has been determined.  And a '''point''' well worth consideration, is that even if not yet greenlit, Brad Bird's wish to make a film about the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 '''continues''' to receive coverage:http://geektyrant.com/news/2011/12/15/brad-bird-gives-update-on-his-1906-san-francisco-earthquake.html"Brad Bird gives update on his 1906 San Francisco Earthquake Film Project", ''Geek Tyrant'', December 2011 http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/brad-birds-latest-1906-project-update-why-its-taking-so-long/"Brad Bird's Latest '1906' Project Update and Why It's Taking So Long", ''First Showing'', December 2011http://www.mtv.com/videos/movies/718679/brad-bird-says-the-script-for-1906-is-still-in-progress.jhtml#id=1675786"Brad Bird Says The Script For '1906' Is Still In Progress ", ''MTV'', December 2011to support the years of ongoing topic coverage.http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%221906+%28film%29%22&num=50#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Brad+Bird%22%2C+1906+(film)&oq=%22Brad+Bird%22%2C+1906+(film)&gs_l=serp.2...142390.148578.3.148625.25.18.0.0.0.9.579.5268.2-13j2j0j2.17.0...0.0.umZIzi5eM6g&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=9ef31202156bf7cb&biw=983&bih=591http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%221906+%28film%29%22&num=50#q=%22Brad+Bird%22,+San+Francisco+earthquake&hl=en&tbm=nws&prmd=imvnso&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=2q_yT-i4JsnCrQHi8dGJCQ&ved=0CCQQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=9ef31202156bf7cb&biw=983&bih=591  We learn that while the project is by no means dead, his wish to make the film has been held off due to his now directing ''1952'' for Disney.http://www.craveonline.com/film/articles/187959-brad-birds-next-film-is-the-super-secret-1952http://collider.com/brad-bird-1952/163826/http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/brad-bird-to-direct-mystery-disney-project-1952-penned-by-damon-lindelof-20120503  AFD's #1 and #2 resulted in deletes in 2007... more than 5 years ago.... reasonable AT THAT TIME the requisite significant coverage of this topic was lacking. Problematic as future films sometimes are, and as many times as some are returned to AFD, earlier consensus should be respected and this |well covered topic should not become a .  That said, |guideline itself tells us notability |can be established through a film's production meeting |notability criteria. Certainly not all future projects are notable... but sometimes one can be found, and we allow such articles. I disagree with
— User:Erik, 01:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CBALL||WP:NFF||WP:FFCLARIFY||WP:NFF||WP:NF||WP:CBALL||WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:KEEPLISTINGTILLITGETSDELETED||WP:NFF||WP:FFCLARIFY||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)