Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Pelc
No, we ought not treat the guidelines as fixed law ... but we also have to have a pressing reason to set aside guidelines which enjoy wide consensus.  What is the pressing reason here?  That, well, Dan Pelc is a swell fellow, and, well, that it'd be awfully nice for him to have an article?  There is no evidence that he meets the GNG, he doesn't meet , there is no "spirit" of notability requirements out there for him to meet, and if we handed out eligibility to anyone who "almost" met requirements, then hand me my Wikipedia article: my dozen publication credits in role-playing games are surely good enough.  NOT
— User:Ravenswing, 21:58, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFOOTY (Wikipedia:Notability)