Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality of Vikesland
as per nom. Not encyclopedically notable; appears to be a vanity project. The article's claims about Vikesland having actual sovereign nation status are a violation of  and are also silly (Vikesland does not have the capability of having diplomatic relations with well-established sovereign states which give it no recognition - the Vikesland "ambassador" would simply be escorted off the premises by security; Vikesland also has no sovereign political authority, unless it has a private military which is able to face down the combined Canadian, US and UK armed forces and police services over the exercise of sovereignty on Vikesland territories
— User:Bwithh, 01:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SOAP (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)