Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DirectIA
but with a question.  Does anyone have ready access to the cited sources to determine whether they specifically mention ''DirectIA'' as opposed to, for example, simply "situated AI," "subsumption architectures" in general?  I agree that the article is spammy and its purpose is promotional: however, that's not in itself always sufficient reason for deletion.  If the cited references actually devote substantial attention to ''DirectIA'' in particular, then the topic probably meets  and the solution is possibly not deletion but rather cleaning up the article to remove any promotional material and/or tone.  On the other hand, if the cited sources have nothing to say specifically about ''DirectIA,'' then the article ought to be deleted
— User:Rrburke, 21:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)