Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effi Wizen
because even though sources verifying his works do not give enough detail about his life to support a decent article. Even his Royal Television Society|RTS Television Awards http://www.rts.org.uk/rts-craft-design-awards-20002001 nomination did not itself receive notice.  Even though not a violation of , we can allow it back once this person receives some media attention for who is is and not for what he has done (though it would seem that they are intricately inter-related). However, under  the nomination ''could'' be enough to allow this to remains and grow over time and through regular editing... and | #1 & #2 it ''might'' be seen that his works themselves have received enough attention (mostly in |non-English sources) to meet that SNG,http://www.cgw.com/Publications/CGW/2006/Volume-29-Issue-10-Oct-2006-/Digi-Documentary.aspxhttp://cinema.terra.com.br/interna/0,,OI3871439-EI1176,00.htmlhttp://www.focus.de/kultur/medien/special-effects-kino-toccata-in-digital_aid_149321.htmlhttp://www.old.diariodepernambuco.com.br/assinantes/acesso_dp.asphttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/worlds-hottest-production-facilities-23343http://www.dci.com.br/servicos/grupo-brasileiro-compra-a-produtora-canadense-imarion-id247058.html which is why my delete stance is "weak
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 21:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:BIO||WP:ANYBIO||WP:CREATIVE||WP:NONENG (Wikipedia:Notability)