Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BaoFeng UV-5R (2nd nomination)
Nothing has changed in the 9 days between these two AfD discussions, so I will re-iterate my earlier recommendation: The ARRL, FCC and Hackaday sources are independent RS and there seems enough depth for  and a modest article. In particular, the FCC is primary, but authoritative for their own sanction, and the sanction is about selling the UV-5R. I consider Hackaday a reliable source for maker/hacking topics--there is some editorial oversight, and their content is usually solid. Cheap and controversial, the UV-5R has had more impact than most transceivers. Reasonable people can disagree, but given my knowledge of the amateur radio field, the topic seems a modest keep. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
— User:Mark, 20:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)