Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Lynch (2nd nomination)
User:Huldra and User:Mr rnddude sum it up. The sources are a single book by a local researcher, either self-published or produced by a local press so small that it's pretty much invisible, with a stack of scraps of information from local contemporary newspapers, which are presumably taken from the one book that has assembled them. This =/= significant secondary sources: it's a single secondary source of low status plus loads of primary sources extracted from it. There seems to be a lot of misunderstanding here of what the newspaper entries are: they're not feature articles but routine reports of local court proceedings and the like, and getting mentioned in them just doesn't confer notability. I suppose it's conceivable that the histories of these women / existence of this book may now be picked up from Wikipedia after the profile they're receiving and disseminated more widely, so that this may eventually turn out to be an instance of 
— User:Eustachiusz, 02:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: :WP:TOOSOON (Wikipedia:Too soon)