Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jules Joffrin (Paris Métro)
We can argue about notability until we are blue in the face, and probably get nowhere. However, none of those above arguing for "keep" seem to take seriously the first, and probably stronger, claim of the nominator: that the article is ''completely'' unsourced, and so fails ! Take, for example, this, from the article: "The station opened in 1912." Suppose someone came along, and edited this to read "The station opened in 1913." Not being knowlegable about the topic myself, I cannot honestly decide which is correct. And without any sources cited, on what grounds could one argue that it must be changed back to 1912? Additionally, it has been suggested that the problem is that the sources are in french, not that they do not exist. This is a fine point: but the article still needs to cite existant sources, and no one has provided ''any,'' in french or otherwise. I do not claim that it is impossible to find sources for the article, and so it must be deleted. I claim that it is against policy that the article remain on WP without sources, and ''so far,'' none are forthcoming. If this changes, so will my '''delete''' opinion
— User:Echuck215, 00:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:V (Wikipedia:Verifiability)