Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Aguiar
In terms of qualifying for a Wikipedia article, the notability test is not the things the article ''says'', but the quality of the ''sources'' that can be shown to ''support'' the things it says. For example, a person is not "notable" for appearing in a film if your source for the claim is a video clip of the film's trailer on a streaming platform; a person becomes notable for appearing in a film if the appearance led |reliable sources (i.e. media) to write and publish ''journalistic'' coverage ''about'' the appearance. But this is referenced entirely to |primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and even on a Google search there's literally nothing better out there. Wikipedia is |not LinkedIn: we are not a place where people are entitled to have an article about them just because they exist, we are an encyclopedia where an article becomes earned by passing a notability criterion and receiving media coverage
— User:Bearcat, 14:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:NOTLINKEDIN (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)