Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of items associated with Weekly Shōnen Jump
The article is indeed in ''very'' bad shape. Especially with sentences like "The most likely series of JUMP Comics (store-wise) would be Naruto". It is in dire need of referencing, removal of promotional content, and needs a new name. My only comment would be that these are |surmountable problems. If we had to look at the notability of JUMP and the possibility of a sub-article for their products there is plenty of |significant coverage. JUMP is one of the largest manga publications in Japan. A  search reveals thousands of sources, particularly in Japanese, and many of them are about their products. I'm not certain if there's enough for a sub-article on each product. The main article is already a fair size which brings us right back to a single sub-article about their products if it can be written well. We can and do have articles about commercial products if covered in a comprehensive and encyclopedic way. Before we mention , the Star Wars franchise as being a prolific example, has a relevant and comparable series of sub articles about products related to the franchise that meet our notability standards. Based upon the sources available, ''this article'' could likely get there under a single sub article
— User:Mkdw, 15:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE||WP:OTHERSTUFF (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)