Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zane B. Stein
Whoof -- there are certainly people who are very powerfully invested in interpreting Wikipedia notability guidelines to squeeze this fellow through.  For all the repeated -- and oft-shrill -- exhortations to read , I question whether the editors did themselves. For one thing, they are ignoring a critical element of notability policy: that ''all'' such notability guidelines are subordinate to the GNG -- meeting their criteria is considered (officially) to presumptively pass the GNG.  The entire "Additional Criteria" section holds that "meeting one or more of the subordinate criteria does '''not''' guarantee that a subject should be included."Beyond that, though, editors such as Softlavender and Kooky2 repeatedly maintain that the subject meets , but proffer no evidence from reliable, credible sources for the same beyond their own unsupported assertions.  Sorry, but that dog won't hunt
— [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']], 06:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)