Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter James Knight
Murders are unfortunately all too common. Even if this was the first abortion-related murder in Australia, I don't see why that would make it especially notable. It could perhaps be a mention in an article on abortion-related violence (if we even have something like that). I disagree that Supreme Court judgments are secondary sources: they are the primary sources that secondary sources (like newspaper journalists) rely upon. As for the sources, the Google search provided by the nom gives many hits, if you restrain this to "Peter Knight" and abortion, it is already much less. Skimming through the top hits, I don't see any that meet , just blogs, advocacy sites, etc. As the original prodder, I stick to my opinion that this person is not notable, but am willing to change my mind if good sources are presented, the Google search not being convincing at all
— User:Crusio, 21:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)