Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expletive infixation
I don't understand the arguments against this article... wait a minute... there are none! Every "delete" vote is merely making fun of the article and/or calling it "ridiculous." Last time I checked the AfD is meant for discussion and arguments for deletion, not mocking the articles at hand. Now, there have been many articles (both newspaper and scholarly) written about the subject, so it easily fulfills both  and  (see this article in the ''Toronto Star'': http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/document?_m=506b02ad7e26bc148cd45d04183e7ccd&_docnum=3&wchp=dGLbVlb-zSkVA&_md5=85dc90e9fcdc15fc2d87d6f6a9643366 and then add that to the already numerous mentions in JSTOR and Google Scholar). Needless to say, I would hope for a more mature discussion in an AfD, especially about a linguistic phenomenon that is both notable and serious
— User:Rockstar915, 19:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)