Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujeer Du'a
WP:GNG says "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list."  Prayer books (and website prayer books) are not independent of the subject.  This article could have been proposed for speedy deletion under . {{ping|Saff V.}} can you find significant coverage in independent reliable sources?  I am not even sure what significant coverage would look like.  I can see that the prayer might be mentioned in passing in sources - but that does not justify inclusion.  Wikipedia is not a dictionary of blessings and prayers
— User:Toddy1, 08:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:A7 (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion)