Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guybrush Threepwood
Like LeChuck, the article is unacceptably bad, being about two-thirds redundant plot summary and one-third |original speculation/observation about the character. Once you've taken those two out all that's left is the story about Guy.Brush, a paragraph that can safely go into the series article
— User:Nifboy, 07:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Stance: merge
Cited policy: WP:OR (Wikipedia:No original research)