Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liesel Litzenburger
The Amazon ranking was meant to suggest there is no "well known body of work". Pointing out the number of DLs in the article is to suggest the author is not that well known either as there tends to be an obvious correlation. If a keep is based solely upon "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews", then such "reviews" should be examined in detail. The "reviews" in ''Publishers Weekly'', ''Kirkus Reviews'' don't seem to be reviews at all; they lack comment by the "reviewer" and seem to be just a synopsis of the book - more of a press-release by the publisher for promotional purposes. The ''The New York Times'' review gives some actual commentary on the book, so that should count. I can't make judgement on the others since there are no links given. The Martha Stewart "short-short" is written by the author, the only thing said by Stewart is the rather vague mention that she is "a prize-winning novelist" without explaining just what this prize is. All I see here that is one review in the NYT and a lot of self-promotion. I don't think this is keeping with the intent of  at all
— User:MB, 15:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:AUTHOR (Wikipedia:Notability)