Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Meir (2nd nomination)
A friendly reminder that the Globe and Mail article is actually about the group "Adventurers and Scientists for Conservation" and only mentions Meir peripherally. The PR-related NSF, Scripps, and NASA website material and her NASA homepage also do not satisfy what we conventionally consider . There are several web-zine articles, but these likewise don't seem to be  either. For example, the http://www.livescience.com/14091-modern-mother-goose-attempts-unravel-flight-bar-headed-goose.html Mother Goose article says it is "provided to LiveScience in partnership with the National Science Foundation", seemingly more NSF-contracted publicity rather than legitimate, independent coverage of Meir. I agree it is somewhat soon after the first AfD, but nom appears to have not been involved in the previous one. If article is kept, it is likely we'll all be here again in a few months when someone else wonders by and realizes this person isn't actually notable. Respectfully
— User:Agricola44, 05:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)