Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Protocol (video game)
as lacking sufficient non-trivial coverage in |reliable sources to demonstrate |notability. The sources have been pretty exhaustively explored above and on the talk page, and I agree that the only remotely good one appears to be from GameSpy. However, I should note that the GameSpy article is ''not'' a review; it's a preview written last year. The fact that it has since generated no new content on that site I would actually call an assertion of non-notability. This also isn't the first time apparent users of the site came to support a Wikipedia article on the game. Beyond Protocol was speedy deleted four times and salted last year
— User:Someguy1221, 08:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:N (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)