Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe Levin
OK, I am finding a sizable amount of dedicated and extensive coverage in a number of reliable sources. It's just that this article doesn't mention or reflect that at all and seems to have been written by someone less than competent, and the article does not assert any kind of recognizable notability. It's also true that the article creator has been edit warring over non- citations, etc. I don't know whether to !vote Delete with no prejudice for someone else creating a decent article with the actual RS interview coverage she has received, or just leave this article standing and wait for someone else to add the RS coverage
— User:Softlavender, 07:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)