Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of "Occupy" protest locations
The calls above for "speedy keep" and "snow keep" are absolutely unwarranted. There are several argued "delete" !votes, so what's the hurry with closing this without allowing further debate? Why silencing those who think this list is not notable? And it is neither notable not informative. Really, look at it. It's a list of countries and cities. If you click on one of those links, do you get any more info about the events that this list claims to be about? Absolutely not: you go to an article describing tat country or city. This "list" does not fulfill any of the purposes that lists normally have. It does not aid in navigation, it does not provide info that cannot be included very easily in the main article (there's no reason to provide an exhaustive list of every place where people gathered). As far as I can see, most "keep" !votes boil down to Wp:ILIKEIT, , , , , basically every argument in rguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Also, several of the arguments against the "delete" votes are just putting up straw men. Nobody is saying that the "Occupy" protests are not notable, so stop repeating that. The argument here is about whether this ''list'' is worth keeping and, so far, I see no compelling arguments that it is
— User:Crusio, 09:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:USEFUL||WP:MAJORITY||WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:INTERESTING||WP:A (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)