Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renfield's syndrome
2000 Ghits make it hard to argue that it's a |neologism.  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renfield's syndrome|Risker's hypothesis (unlike Renfield's syndrome) may not pass peer review :-).  To use Risker's own words from another page, the allegation of neologism is based on ''irrelevant information'' with ''no significance'' from sources unknown.  Absence of evidence ≠ evidence of absence.  This topic isn't |something made up one day.  Improve the article -- don't delete it
— User:Ssbohio, 05:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:MADEUP (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)