Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passionato
I created this page, after some thought, because it was of personal interest. My argument for notability would be based on the extensive news coverage. Many news sites covered the launch as well as the BBC story cited. Obviously such coverage could be transitory and the whole thing may fold up. I also think it is notable as one of the few sites dedicated exclusively to the download of classical music. The other thing I checked was wikipedia coverage of music downoad sites - there are quite a few here, and even a Comparison of online music stores|comparison page that I intended to update with data from this site (once I could actually log on to it after launch day problems). But, , I'm not too personally concerned either way. I'm prepared to bet, however, that it will need to be re-created fairly soon. On another note, there's no notice of this afd on my talk page which is discourteous per . I also object to the "obvious spam" accusation. Even a brand new companty (sic) can be  and I would hope that my edit record shows I'm not here to spam
— User:Mcewan, 21:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PROD||WP:WEB (Wikipedia:Proposed deletion)