Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/web directories
IF the articles are fixed up with regard to  and , then I say '''Keep'''; there isn't anything in them that smacks of , ANITY, or .  Note that the GoGuides article links to a source that can be both cited and mined for additional information that might aid in article cleanup.  I believe these articles ''can'' be salvaged if someone cares enough to fix them. Cleaneruppers: They have individual problems as well as what's been outlined already (MusicMoz violates the "crystal ball" clause of  - "...aims to be a directory..."; Skaffe is based unabashedly on the site's own marketing materials, so it's not reliable - "It touts itself..." - I forget the WP: link to that one.) &mdash
— User:SMcCandlish, 06:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:SPAM||WP:AUTO||WP:VANITY||WP:NFT||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)