Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sociopaths in Society
I think the last time that we disagreed on a deletion discussion, consensus was wholeheartedly on my side, so I'm not quite sure where this "once again" is coming from.  But look, my initial argument was completely correct at the time I made it (which I could elaborate on, but in view of what I'm about to say would be a waste of time).  Since then, you've significantly improved the article, which I hadn't noticed, to the point where it is STILL an awful article on the unallowable topic "sociopaths in society" but is actually a pretty good starting point for an article on "sociopathy".  Procedurally, the correct path is to delete this article, userfy it to your user space, and then allow you to use the content to create an article of sociopathy.  However, practically speaking, I think an  approach of renaming it to a name befitting its new content would be better, both for involving less bureaucracy, and as preserving the edit history.  I have accordingly changed my vote to rename, on the basis of the work you have done.  What it gets renamed to I don't much mind as long as the name accurately reflects the new content.  And next time, you can get the same result with a polite notice "I have improved the article", rather than a personal attack on me
— User:DustFormsWords, 04:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)