Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Local Live
I'm not sure it fails . It has some secondary sources that, while not all explicitly about the topic, give it more than a trivial mention. I say weak because, in spite of that,  | Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and it may be more appropriate to include in another article, rather than as its own article, but I'm not familiar with the topic, most of its links are red, and so I doubt that's a likely possibility. I side with keep because it may be notable, and, if there is an article it can be merged with in the future, I think we can revisit it as a merger, but delete seems a little over-the-top at the moment
— User:Wugapodes, 14:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:INDISCRIMINATE (Wikipedia:Notability)