Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Michigan Review
Seems to fail  due to a lack of multiple independent and reliable sources with significant coverage. The best notability evidence, press coverage of a couple of publicity stunts, seems weak.   Just being a contrarian paper (right-winger editors at a liberal campus) does not make it inherently notable. Claims that several former editors have had a bit of prominence similarly fails to prove the paper is notable. I could find at the paper's website no evidence it has a large circulation, or that it has won national college press awards, or that its articles have been widely cited. Claiming it is "probably more widely read than" some other paper are unconvincing. No student activity automatically deserves an encyclopedia article, any more than an article about a bowling league or a choral society or a camera club would
— User:Edison, 16:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)