Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savanna Theory
initially I was leaning ''merge'' to Aquatic ape hypothesis, but this article is a bit long for that.  Aquatic ape hypothesis is, in my opinion, patently ridiculous (and even less supported than the "Terence McKenna|Stoned Ape" theory), but the argument against traditional evolutionary theory by proponents of AAH appears to be documented, and documented enough under the name "Savanna Theory" (or Savannah Theory)  that it isn't a |neologism.   states '''verifiability, not truth''' and this seems to be a very good example of such.  The fact that there is a Savanna Theory can be verified... whether it is true or not is irrelevant.  Article has POV issues, but those are editorial concerns.  We don't wipe out the Astrology article becuase it is complete bollocks... we edit it to be a balanced, encyclopedic view of the topic
— User:Isotope23, 13:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NEO||WP:V (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)