Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Saxton Burr
I think that with  topics, that notability is only demonstrated when a reliable mainstream source provides adequate commentary on the fringiness of the work.  There were some pretty wacky ideas banded about in the 1930s-1950s period.  It also seems that he did some good but routine work in the 1930s but then went off on a bizarre tangent of L-fields.  He was an anatomist, and apparently more of a teacher of basic anatomy to med students than a cutting-edge researcher.  It isn't really enough that even though have http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2603704/ this additional reference I found - this seems to be "wasn't old Burry such a decent chap".  We need decent history of (pseudo)science source(s) and that provide examination from a mainstream perspective.  I am not convinced about the notability of L-fields either
— User:Barney, 18:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)