Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheating in Counter-Strike (2nd nomination)
Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. If you find this article useful, perhaps you might enjoy www.gamefaqs.com, which is where this sort of thing should go. Any article about cheating in Counterstrike, if we had to have one, would be '''about''' the cheating, listing the history in a structured and referenced manner, the articles people have written about the cheating culture in Counterstrike, perhaps. Unfortunately, there are no reliable references, and there are no articles written about cheating in Counterstrike, so what we have instead is a shitty big list of ways to haXX0rz the game and a load of namedrops for a bunch of user / anon's awesome scriptkid buddies. Not even remotely close to an encyclopaedic article. And then for good measure, a crapload of original research about 'why Counterstrike is subject to so much cheating', with theories pulled out of the air, blogs, and forums. It will be unfortunate if the special interest groups get this one kept with |keep it because I like it arguments, when there is not a single redeeming feature about it. To summarise based on policy, this article ought to be deleted because it fails |Wikipedia is not a game guide, is irredeemably |original research, lacks |reliable sources, and is 99% |unverifiable.  It might just about be |NPOV, and hey, one out of |5 pillars is enough, right
— User:Proto, 20:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ILIKEIT||WP:NOT||WP:NOR||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:5P (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)