Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenton Lengel
The most reliable sources provided don't actually mention the subject at all, or are only passing mentions.  The only sources that really cover him specifically are blog posts, press releases, and the subject's own web site.  Very few of the "speedy keep" commenters appear to really know |what that term really means--it's for nominations where the subject very obviously is notable (which, even if my own assessment is incorrect, is most assuredly not the case), or for which the nomination was indisputably in bad faith (debatable, perhaps, but not indisputable).  Moreover, most of these "speedy keep" !voters have relatively few edits in general or in AfD discussions in particular.  (To be fair, the nominator doesn't have a long editing history either.)  Regardless of the motives on either side here, the article itself does not appear to meet the |notability guidelines for biographies
— User:Finngall, 22:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SK||WP:BIO (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)