Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of baseball jargon
Seems like a spiteful nomination (or at least done purely out of principal), as I cited this basball article article as an example in another AfD discussion.  Sorry baseball fans... I had no idea it would get this reaction.  As for why to keep this article... it falls clearly under  1.5.2 which allows for  ''structured lists to assist with the organisation of articles''.  This provides extensive commentary and more importantly links to many baseball articles, and it cleraly helps to organize them.  I guess I'll stop citing articles I actually care about as examples
— User:W, 00:10, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)