Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyewitness identification
I can't understand why this was nominated in the first place. The article is extremely well referenced, and the consensus of research is that eyewitness identification evidence is a leading cause of wrongful conviction (whether is it the number one cause I don't know).  It therefore does not violate , and as it is clearly notable there are no grounds for deletion.  May I suggest you withdraw the nomination so as not to waste people's time
— User:Ffbond, 01:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)