Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleep sort
This is a joke   but not one that's actually notable under , unlike the famous comefrom statement.  The detail that items are ''scheduled'' is irrelevant to this silly "algorithm" but the Rube Goldberg complexity is distracting:  What's actually happening is that it just uses the scheduler to do the sorting.  (Ignore races and imagine the granularity of the scheduler is diminishingly small; the scheduler still has to sort things into a list.)  This is no different than building a wrapper around any real sort algorithm of your choice and calling it WrapperSort.  There's a reason there are no sources to support notability
— User:Msnicki, 14:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:MADEUP||WP:OR||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day)