Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimi Hendrix: Canadian drug charges and trial
The article gives |undue weight to this non-notable event that shouldn't have a stand-alone page. Yes, it can be argued this was an important event Hendrix's life but many notable people have important events happen in their life (marriages for example). That fact that it was "important for them" doesn't merit it as being notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Hendrix, while he was a use of drugs, is not notable for his involvement with drugs- he is notable for his music. The article can be paraphrased as: "Hendrix had drugs on him, was charged with possession, he could have faced 20 years but didn't." I can't see why anyone looking up Hendrix be looking for more than that. Kudos to the |pointiness and |redundant fork. The lack of press coverage at the time (circumstances aside) concerns me too. Many sources are from significantly after the event - they're neutrality is questionable. Given the creator's super-aggressive and often straw man arguments, I think the creator is unquestionably |not being neutral, I interpret the notability of the event as being largely exaggerated by
— User:GabeMc, 03:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:UNDUE||WP:POINT||WP:REDUNDANTFORK||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)