Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural impact of Beyoncé
u|Bettydaisies}}, literally this entire article is copied wholesale from other articles. There is simply nothing here that other articles don't do better (well, technically the exact same). Lemonade (Beyoncé album)#Impact_and_legacy and Beyoncé (album)#Legacy are prime examples of this because, again, that's where most of this information was lazily copy-pasted from. I furthermore don't understand how the 'Legacy' section in her biography is considered "lengthy" when compared to any other section there; if anything, it's far shorter than the vast majority of sections in that article. Moreover, you argue that deleting this article would "bloat" Beyoncé#Legacy, but literally nothing in the article 'Cultural impact of Beyoncé' is original material except for one relatively insubstantial edit by Nguyen0409; nothing would need to be migrated out to other articles, as it already exists there. By deleting this article, nothing would change in any other Beyoncé-related article, full stop. If you don't believe me that nothing here isn't already in just a handful of other articles (give or take three of them), copy-paste any sentence into Wikipedia's search bar, and it'll return this and one other article. Understand, Bettydaisies, {{u|Bgkc4444}}, and {{u|Jimoincolor}}, that this entire article is |a redundant fork and would need to be rewritten entirely, not just "expanded" to fill in some gaps. Even if that were done, however, it would likely end up being an inferior version of the legacy sections in |Good Articles that we already have. Nothing that anybody wants to add here couldn't realistically go in another Beyoncé article such as Beyoncé#Legacy (which isn't "lengthy" by any means), Lemonade (Beyoncé album)#Impact_and_legacy, and Beyoncé (album)#Legacy, because that's where this material already exists. Not to mention that the material there ''is much better-curated'' as well. As an example, Beyoncé (album) and Beyoncé are both Good Articles. Meanwhile, this one has yet to even be given any categories besides "Beyoncé" (and even that was only done by {{u|DoubleGrazing}}, who happened to be passing by, to make it not {{uncategorized}}), assessed by anybody, or even have the relevant WikiProjects attached to it. Letting such an obvious redundant fork like this remain and inevitably decay into an inferior version of those other articles will only harm the project
— User:TheTechnician27, 14:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:REDUNDANTFORK||WP:GA (Wikipedia:Content forking)