Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlene McMann (3rd nomination)
We have two sources about the charity which are marginal at best—I think it's reaching a bit to call this "significant coverage"—and a few news articles on her sentencing, all of which seem to be the attorney general's press release lightly rearranged. The embezzlement alone would absolutely not meet the  guideline; I don't think adding the minimal coverage of the charity pre-scandal really makes this a notable biography. (Contra the previous poster, in the 21st Century, the range of crimes classified "felonies" is so broad as to confer no particular distinction; might I suggest we consider the question of the article's notability strictly on its merits, rather than making this some kind of demonstration of You Can't Threaten Us
— User:Choess, 06:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CRIM (Wikipedia:Notability)