Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StrongVPN
since I already casted my vote and others are disagreeing. I don't see any problems with reviews. They provide significant, independent reliable coverage of the subject. They are published by TechRadar (who calls it "a major VPN brand"), ZDNet, Tom's Hardware and PCWorld who all meet the  requirements. Apart from the reviews, the subject is mentioned in works published by academic publishers like Springer Publishing and Association for Computing Machinery and the acquisition has been mentioned in the news. Based on these sources, the subject can have a standalone article per , and can also be extended. The article is written with  in mind, I don't think it is promotional or spam at all. Also, the article has been extended since being nominated. Above of that, the nominator has been accused
— User:PhotographyEdits, 19:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)