Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PfSense
Covered by Softpediahttps://www.google.com/search?q=pfsense+site%3Anews.softpedia.com (if good enough for Department of Homeland Security http://dhs-daily-report.blogspot.com/, good enough for me), InfoWorldhttps://www.google.com/search?q=pfsense+site%3Ainfoworld.com, NetworkWorld, ZDNet, SecurityWeek, Phoronixhttps://www.google.com/search?q=pfsense+site%3Aphoronix.com, Tech Republic; multiple books written on subject; Microsoft writes about configuring it for their productshttp://blogs.technet.com/b/nexthop/archive/2014/04/07/configuring-pfsense-as-a-reverse-proxy-for-lync-web-services.aspx. Notability is not established by sources in article ( maybe applies?), but their mere existence elsewhere. Article could certainly use some cleanup, however. Maybe OP can search for external sources (appears to not have occurred prior to AfD...) and include those into article. A primary sources tag is warranted in head of article, but not deletion, as it clearly meets GNG. Namaste. --&nbsp
— User:Dsprc, 18:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:CIRC (Wikipedia:Verifiability)