Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clogau Gold
the article is a mess of promotion and spam wrapped in disingenuous sourcing. While I agree that  wasn't ''really'' designed to apply to trade journals, the trade journals in question have issues that extend beyond their general premise. ''Master Jewellers'' seems to base most of its content on press releases - none of the articles are attributed to journalists and there doesn't seem to be any sort of editorial oversight mechanism. I'm not even sure that the "articles" are ever published as part of a magazine. ''Retail Jeweller'' hires ex-journalists but their role at RJ is actually ''"working on bespoke projects for individual clients"'' - ie. promotion/advertising. That's fine, of course, but those don't make for strong sources. The source issues combined with the actual content suggest there's nothing much worth keeping here
— User:Stalwart111, 08:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUD (Wikipedia:Notability)