Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditya Puri
I'm wondering if the nominator searched for sources outside of the article at all, as one is supposed to do before nominating. http://www.forbes.com/sites/anuraghunathan/2015/07/22/hdfc-banks-aditya-puri-has-created-indias-most-valuable-bank/#6af232605a9f This article from Forbes Asia would probably be enough to show notability per , there is also, for example, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/banking/succession-plan-for-hdfc-bank-in-place-says-aditya-puri/articleshow/53329277.cms this and http://www.financialexpress.com/industry/banking-finance/hdfc-bank-md-aditya-puri-once-asked-a-young-manager-bata-laddoo-kidhar-hai-anand-mahindras-interesting-anecdote-at-fe-best-banks-awards/364902/ this, also articles on his salary, his bank, 5000 hits on Google News and 370 hits on Google Books, some of which seem to have non-trivial coverage. That's not even going into sources in Hindi, which I can not assess, but I am absolutely sure are numerous. Hell, the Indian banking regulator seems to have changed their rules on mandatory retirement age just so that this guy could keep working
— User:No, 08:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)