Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megxit
I'm not sure why so many are invoking  on this, which isn't policy or guideline, it's only an essay, and if applied literally would mean we'd never add articles about current events. Much as I personally think the story is overblown nonsense and it shouldn't be a big deal, it's clear that this has enough substance and enough reliable source coverage to easily meet our standards for both notability and having a standalone article. It's a bigger deal than Covfefe. On the naming, although I wouldn't be opposed in principle to a descriptive title I think there's a big problem with defining what that is. For a while the article was titled "Resignation of..." which is inaccurate. They haven't resigned from the Royal family, they've just "stepped back" from some of their duties. As such, the current title which has gained lots of traction in lots of sources, describes the topic in a  fashion and with enough frequency to justify as a . In short, leave exactly as is. Cheers &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp
— User:Amakuru, 10:47, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:TOOSOON||WP:CONCISE||WP:COMMONNAME (Wikipedia:Too soon)