Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanna Barysevich
The existence of pages on other wikis is totally irrelevant to our inquiry. Reading the text, I'm struck by the fact that there is a sole reference, but the article features competing claims. From whence do they come? There is quite clearly no  in multiple, independent |reliable sources evident here. The  of longevity articles needs to be pruned back so that it starts getting closer to compliance with the rules, policies and guidelines that govern our collaboration in creating an encyclopedia. Reflexive opposition to deleting even such clear embarrassments to the project as this thoroughly out-of-policy stub is baffling
— User:David, 18:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:WALLEDGARDEN (Wikipedia:Notability)