Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ping Li
Li's awards above are not ideal because they are "Who's Who" awards which don't grant academic credibility, and the others are extensive lists of individuals, rather than in-depth coverage required for . Li's position in SCiP is also unhelpful toward notability, because SCiP does not appear to be a "major academic society."  Its attendance at last year's meeting was 60 individuals (http://sites.google.com/site/scipws/conference/st-louis-mo-on-thursday-november-18-2010), and that they appear to be a subset of individuals from the larger Psychonomic Society
— User:I, 09:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ACADEMIC (Wikipedia:Notability)