Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design classic
I'm undecided at this point, but the term "Design Classic" appears to be a |neologism ripped from "Phaidon Design Classics".  From the talk page it appears this originated as an attempt to reprint the Phaidon Design Classics list here, which in my opinion is a completely unacceptable concept.  Still, there are other entries in this list that have different sources, but most of this list is completely unsourced and I think the criteria is weak and arbitrary.  If kept, at minimum it needs a move to a better namespace and some good hard editing and sourcing.  Still, I'm not convinced it's worth salvaging even then
— User:Isotope23, 16:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NEO (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary)