Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soccerpulse (2nd nomination)
A poor article with  and  issues, but a pared-back version might be usuable. They seemed to have 10s of 1000s of users and have plenty of hits on google (which doesn't conver notability in and of itself, before anyone chirps in). The Daily Star and FourFourTwo satisfy  and they apparently present people from the forum as 'experts
— User:Eliteimp, 16:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:PUFF||WP:COI||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Wikipuffery)