Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castro Valley Library
GNews reveals more than enough reliable, secondary coverage to justify an article, per  and |the general notability guidelines, at that. That said, while I think the nominator uses the wrong word to describe the problem with the article (it's not "spammy," really) the article is certainly unencyclopedic in several places and reads a bit like a PR piece put out by the library. Clearly, though, that's an editorial concern and not an AfD issue. I see plenty of GNews evidence that this library is locally notable
— User:Ginsengbomb, 05:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LOCAL||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Places of local interest)