Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salem Shaloam David
and agree with User {{user|Brewcrewer}} that because this article is almost entirely reprinted from the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia hence it is  based on a , and is now in the public domain that it is therefore beneficial to WP as an encyclopedic article. Also, in years gone by, User {{User|Shirahadasha}} had once noted http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chaim_Dov_Keller&diff=154418964&oldid=154350305 in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaim Dov Keller that: "...Religious sources and media of notable religious organizations are perfectly acceptable |reliable sources to establish notability of religious subjects and figures. Notability in the field, not notability in general media, is the standard, and that is met here. There is no problem I can see that can justify a delete vote..." and the same applies here. Thank you
— User:IZAK, 07:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:RS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Verifiability)