Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regalix
Perhaps I'm missing something. You've stated that the references pass  and . But, obviously, https://www.cioreviewindia.com/magazine/Regalix-Driving-Innovation-to-Reform-Customer%E2%80%99s-Perspective-in-Digital-Marketing-Space-JAWR747831543.html this reference from CIOReview doesn't have an attributed journalist and fails . It is also extensively relying on an interview with the CEO and is not intellectually independent, therefore failing  *and* . I've also looked at the other references and found issues with each. Do you mind posting the links for two specific references that you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability so that I can determine if my !vote below needs a revisit? Thank you
— User:HighKing, 20:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND (Wikipedia:Notability)