Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saffron Walden Conservatives
see  - that argument won't get you anywhere.  Notability of this must be asserted using reliable secondary sources.  Note the text at  : ''Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Sources should be appropriate to the claims made
— User:The, 15:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)