Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Harris
I suggest editors take a look at this article's Talk:Stacy Harris|talk page discussions, as well as the deleted article links listed above, to see how this COI editor's "middle ground" comment is not any kind of offer to work with other editors, but a summary of how this editor has consistently edited over the past five years and exactly how this editor will continue to edit.  This editor continues to express a willful ignorance of Wikipedia policy, the intention to relentlessly readd the same trivial details, wildly exaggerated claims and sourcing that doesn't meet , can't be verified or does not support the statement, aggressively challenge and bully any editors who try remove or edit the article, and complain that the same persecution, jealousy and fear that keeps her from getting press credentials to the CMAs is also shutting her out from sharing the minute-by-minute account of her life's every single accomplishment, whether they actually happened that way or not. Without clear boundaries and a community of editors willing to enforce them on this article, delete, prune, gut, whatever; we'll be back here in a year defending our stance that posting comments on article pages does not constitute "significant media coverage
— User:Flowanda, 08:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)