Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pictish Mithraism
The theory is certainly , but whether it is ''notable'' fringe in the terms of the policy, I can't tell. The thin referencing suggests not. At the very least (copyvio apart) it should be rewritten to make this crystal-clear. It is unfortunate that the article contains, among the fringe stuff, more good information on & illustration of the Pictish symbols than we currently have anywhere else. If Penny manages to get his book published that might alter things a little, though I can't see it being an RS, but the article might work as one on the book, quoting reviews etc
— User:Johnbod, 14:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)