Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (4th nomination)
I've been following the edits to this article for a few years with fascination (I guess you would call it lurking), but I couldn't bring myself to get involved probably because tensions run so high. Regarding the sources, it's true that the subject is definitely  by Wikipedia standards but the preponderance of reliable sources are quite critical of him, giving him an interesting case of notability. Do we delete the article because the preponderance of independent secondary sources only mention him in passing but are critical of this BLP or do we keep it and just document what they say? Personally, I favor simply reflecting what they say about him and being honest with the reader
— User:Oddexit, 20:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Fringe theories)