Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermes in popular culture
Popular culture references are not in themselves at all an indiscriminate collection of information, so that argument as rationale for deleting is completely baseless. Could it use improvement? Sure, but then lots of articles can. If you don't think it's good right now, EDIT IT. This information can certainly be written in an encyclopedic way, and it's important enough information (though the trivia parts can be deleted) and needs some place in this project, and there's not a good way to keep it on the main article. We've been splitting these off into separate articles for years now. That's the Wikipedia way. We have a stream of people nominating any pop culture articles for deletion, and they should be warned to stop as a gross violation of the  violation. (I am at my new location and have limited Internet connectivity, so saw this and came to vote
— User:DreamGuy, 19:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)