Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornerstone Barristers
I've had a look through the sources that the IP added. A good number of them were |primary sources, either from Cornerstone themselves or from legal documents. Of the secondary sources that were included, none of them seem to discuss the actual Cornerstone organization. Rather, they discuss cases that Cornerstone has been involved with or barristers who are Cornerstone members. This is not good enough to prove notability on Wikipedia, in my opinion, because |notability is not inherited. I think that rather than having a stand-alone article about Cornerstone, it may be more appropriate to mention them in the biographies of Cornerstone barristers that already have a Wikipedia article
— User:Mr, 05:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:PRIMARY||WP:INHERIT (Wikipedia:No original research)