Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul William Day (2nd nomination)
with respects to User:WikiDan61 & nominator User:Davnor.  While the original version did not meet BLP, that is no longer the case. The current version meets BLP concerns while the original did not.  The Article went through many changes since it was first created by a one-edit SPA as it became property of Wikipedia and other editors looked in. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_William_Day&action=historysubmit&diff=354108440&oldid=354107851 This became http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_William_Day THIS... showing that editors were/are interested in making it a decently encyclopedic and sourced article per .  If the close was somehow incorrect, a DRV would have been the proper course, rather than a hurried renomination.   Policy acknowledges that |immediate perfection is not demmanded. So 12 days from a non-disputed close to a renomination of a non-consensus kept article seems just a bit of a hurry, no?  If this had not been improved in six months and then returned to AFD, I might be more inclined to agree with you. But this is just too soon back at AFD
— User:MichaelQSchmidt, 22:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:IMPROVE||WP:IMPERFECT (Wikipedia:Editing policy)