Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mech people
I prefer to go by what reliable sources say rather than by what a Wikipedia editor claims. It may be a failure to understand the connotations of the word in English, but the repeated use of the word "barbarian" is hardly going to endear anyone to this cause. There is clearly a substantial body of opinion in reliable sources, including the government of Assam, that this is a separate (but related) group. If there is sufficient |weight in reliable sources saying that they are the same as the Boro people then the controversy should be covered in the article, but it certainly shouldn't be deleted.{{pb}}One other thing that I must mention is that we shouldn't regard Raj-era sources such as the one used for the map on this page and the one {{diff2|955010289|I removed from the article}} as reliable - see
— User:Sitush, 12:09, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:weight (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)