Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in English labeled the worst ever
The article is encyclopedic and has plenty of potential, and meets none of the criteria for deletion. It is also true that common sense dictates that renominating an article repeatedly is counterproductive verging on abusing the system or pushing for a |point. A fair length of time is required between nominations. For example, I'd love to nominate :Category:LGBT criminals, :Category:LGBT murderers, and :Category:LGBT serial killers for deletion this minute, but because two of them somewhat recently survived VfDs, I'll wait until a safer amount of time has passed. And it's even worse in this situation, where the circumstances ''haven't'' in any way changed since the last nomination. Where's the justification for attempting to defy a clear consensus like this? Even if you honestly think an article shouldn't exist, you must work ''within'' the system to seek its deletion, not try to bend the system to your wishes and force things to go your way through sheer persistence
— User:Silence, 16:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)