Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Western Daily
To be fair, I'll acknowledge that at the time DGG first nominated this, it contained no references at all and was essentially a marketing brochure which said little of substance beyond "this is a newspaper that exists, and covers things that newspapers cover". But the content and referencing has been significantly improved, and per  a newspaper does not have to have won awards to be notable enough for inclusion (although that certainly wouldn't hurt, it's not at all a precondition) — the ''only'' claim of notability that a newspaper actually has to make to be kept is that its existence and at least a bit of history is |verifiable in sources ''independent'' of its own |self-published content about itself, and that's now been amply shown here
— User:Bearcat, 23:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NMEDIA||WP:V||WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:Notability)