Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PetalMD
Fails  and . This is an emerging software with a limited geographical scope which makes it  as well. I'm particularly concerned that the sources seem to be examples of ; redressing press releases and printing them. For example https://www.betakit.com Betakit.com seems to exclusively focus on publishing startup news and seems to publish literally all news related to startups. This makes it useless as a source to measure notability. http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/affaires/actualite-economique/201601/27/01-4944390-acquisition-strategique-pour-petalmd.php LaPresse news about acquisition is a routine news. This leaves only 2 sources http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/PetalMD+prognosis+good/9711047/story.html Montreal Gazette and http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/z/archives/affaires-/201501/07/01-4833355-la-poussee-fulgurante-de-petalmd.php LaPresse, both of which are unfortunately are more of interviews with the employees of the company rather than an analysis of the company. This makes it borderline primary and of questionable independence. I'm particularly concerned with the lack of independent reviews. With no other coverage, I will go with a delete. Software are some of the easiest things to find sources for and we actually have an over-coverage of software on Wikipedia. This one falls short of it
— User:Lemongirl942, 05:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NSOFTWARE||WP:TOOSOON||WP:SPIP (Wikipedia:Notability)