Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle (company)
and please quit this stuff.  Passes , no dern question about it.  Attempts to redefine  should be pursued in talkspace (WT and usertalk).  AfD is not for cleanup, and if the article passes  ''as presently written'', then nominating for AfD is ''|the wrong thing''.  AfD is also not for revenge on the eeevilll ''allegedly'' undisclosed paid editors, either, there is |a tool for that, and both Kudpung and DGG possess said tool.  Bangkeep rationale, using only the extant refs, just for kicks:  WSJ Apr'15,http://www.wsj.com/articles/goldman-a-lead-investor-in-funding-round-for-bitcoin-startup-circle-1430363042 && Wired Apr'15,http://www.wired.com/2015/04/circle-bitcoin-digital-wallet/ plus Boston Globe Mar'14,http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2014/03/26/circle-internet-financial-ltd-gets-financing/jpvDrHbV9H3GgNpNJJdUjN/story.html && NYT Mar'14.http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/start-up-unveils-bitcoin-payments-product-and-additional-financing/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=1 make me strongly suspect that  might just hold a few more  about the company.  But even if it didn't, those four seem sufficient, to my wiki-eyes, to pass  as currently written
— NONE, NONE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:POINT||WP:BLOCK||WP:GOOG||WP:SOURCES||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)