Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.H.O.M.P.S
Satisfies  by significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, in the form of film reviews listed by Dekkappai and others above. The LA Times had what was, per the abstract, a http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/648824932.html?dids=648824932:648824932&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Dec+25%2C+1979&author=&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Tail+Wags+the+Dog+in+%27C.H.O.M.P.S.%27&pqatl=google 368 word review in 1979 by Linda Gross. This also satisfies the first provision of F by having been "widely distributed" and having received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics."  It does not have to satisfy ALL the provisions of NF, just any one of them
— User:Edison, 21:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:NF (Wikipedia:Notability)