Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irvember
On the one hand, I think an argument can be made under  to go ahead and speedily delete the article. On the other, I see the speedy delete criteria of G1 as being intended for articles where no content can be salvaged at all from them: in other words, if it reads like the string of nonsense in a spam email, it's G1 and speedyable. If you can at least make out what the author is saying, then it goes the Prod/AfD route. So, using G1 here to speedy the article would be bad precedent
— User:Cfred, 17:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SNOW (Wikipedia:Snowball clause)