Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judaization of Jerusalem
It's one of the most frequent topics in Israeli newspapers, the events described are of a weekly order. Something that often in the news, and so frequently mentioned in serious books by ranking Israeli historians (Meron Benvenisti in his City of Stone etc.). The phrase has been around since the late 60s, and this accounts for the extensive literature on it. Why delete an article that must cover something that has attracted an extensive secondary literature. (Michael Dumper's book ''The Politics of Sacred Space'' lists quite a few studies on this, Oren Yiftachel's ethnocracy, idem.  Historicist's arguments are all about past history, and therefore the comparison is misplaced. The Judaisation programme is something going on for some decades, the object of intensive often monographic studies and articles, by sociologists, historians of landscape etc.. Silwan's 1500 inhabitants, under the wall, have just got their marching orders. Deleting looks, for the moment, distinctly, like , and nothing more
— User:Nishidani, 21:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)