Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Gospel (book)
The following excerpt from the back cover (as found in the book's page on Amazon.com) seems, to me, to clearly illustrate the view of the author in this book:  ''Ruth Tucker’s overview illumines the personalities whose alleged revelations spawned historical heresies in all the major cults in the United States. She highlights important controversies within each movement as it aims for religious respectability. She pinpoints how the doctrines and practices of a dozen contemporary groups—as well as the New Age Movement—deviate from orthodox Christianity and shows how to reach out to cult members.''  At the very least, the current article fails  because it fails to even try to acknowledge the POV of the book.  Also, I question the citing of this book being required reading at Regent College as being supportive of its notability, given the evangelical Protestant bias of Regent College.  So I still believe this book fails the notability test — though I'm willing to concede that it ''may'' be possible to salvage its lack of NPOV via a major rewrite that does ''not'' tacitly accept a mainstream Protestant viewpoint
— User:Richwales, 19:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)