Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shade and Shadow
Aside from whether or not Film Threat is a reliable source, I can vouch that Amos Lassen certainly is not. He's been accused by multiple people over plagiarizing reviews and has been removed from Amazon over this, among other places. That throws his credibility into enough question to where I'd say he's out of the question as far as using as a reliable source. That leaves the Fangoria review and the FT review. I'm not able to find anything on Fangoria to show that they reviewed the film and the only things that come up on a search all point back to the director's site. Now even if Fangoria did review the movie (and I have no reason to believe that this is a lie), that leaves us with two sole reviews for the film. Two reviews are not enough to show notability for this film and there's nothing else out there to show reason as to why this would pass . This is pretty much just one of many non-notable films that were added to form a walled garden around the film's director. There's also concerns of COI going on here as well, but you can see some of the other AfDs as to that
— User:Tokyogirl79, 16:46, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NFILM (Wikipedia:Notability)