Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Roman cognomina
We have 53 examples at :Category:Ancient Roman cognomina, more than enough to merit a complementary, standalone index of articles per  and . So unless that category is somehow invalid (if it is, please demonstrate why), I'm not seeing any complaints here that can't be resolved by cleanup or development, such as by removing entries that don't merit articles. Also, LISTN is plainly satisfied by the existence of cognomen, which shows these are notable as a group
— User:Postdlf, 18:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN (Wikipedia:Manual of Style)