Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rutherford Institute
per the previous keep rationales. The weakness of my conviction reflects only my lack of previous knowledge of this organisation, but from what I can see it is (a) notable due to its prominence in a number of well reported cases, and (b) very controversial. This controversy is not really reflected in the article about it; I don't think it would be a violation of  to include discussion of the controversy so long as it is suitably backed up with references
— User:RichardOSmith, 18:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NPOV (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)