Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ultra groups
I don't see a problem if some groups are not individually notable, that's what lists are for. (In particular,  and  apply to standalone articles, not to list entries, so arguments along these lines are invalid.) Not being able to find secondary sources for a particular group is grounds for removal of ''that group'' from the list and not the ''entire list'', along with clearly notable and reliably sourced groups. Also, if the list is "impossible to objectively define", how come we have :Category:Ultras groups and why would it - being purely subjective, as it were - "suffice
— User:GregorB, 23:12, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ORG||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)