Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam4Adam
Delete''' -  states that a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself and each other such that there exists enough source material to write a verifiable, encyclopedic article about the topic.  ''Kennedy, Sean (August 29, 2006) The Advocate. They're peddling death. Issue 969, page 44'' might be consider one source.  In September 2005, ''San Jose Mercury News (September 11, 2005) "Busiest online matchmakers." Section: AE'' ranked Adam4Adam as number ten on the top 10 online dating sites based on traffic in the year prior to September 2005: 1 Yahoo! Personals, 2 Match.com, 3 eHarmony, 4 American Singles, 5 Gay.com Personals, 6 Tickle.com|Tickle Matchmaking, 7 Webdate.com, 8 True.com, 9 Perfect Match (dating)|Perfect Match, 10 Adam4Adam.  However, I did not find multiple sources for Adam4Adam.  Lots of interesting information, but the information should come from a Wikipedia source per  to be counted as contributing to a verifiable, encyclopedic article about the topic
— User:Jreferee, 01:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)