Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Trust Council (2nd nomination)
the fact that it went AfD before is not valid reason to keep it. The sources used at last AfD are also brought here again, this is evidence of Temporary notability since no new source are found since 2009 at last AfD and real Notability is . Second; this article is clinging to inherit  Notability from notability mentioning of its directors on websites. Out of the entire 3 sources, 2 are used to reference directors only 1 referenced the subject of the article per se. Deeper look at what the source contain reval no more than mere mention. Hence since Notability is |not inheritable this article virtually has no Independent source addressing it directly. Third, One sources is already dead and these are the only sources forwarded since last AfD almost a decade. Using attached news sources to this AfD, I can't find any thing like  to warrant keeping this |permanent stub falling short of all  standards. This is non notable company that only exists and ≠N ''&thinsp;&mdash;''&nbsp
— User:Ammarpad, 13:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:SIGCOV||WP:PERMASTUB||WP:GNG||WP:E (Wikipedia:Notability)