Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//r/incels
As the creator of the article, I will go into my reasoning for keeping it later or elsewhere (e.g. in replying to other users' views), but I feel the need to address the argument that Spartaz has made for its deletion. Firstly, as a response to the claims about , two of the article's sources are from before r/incels was banned. Secondly, Spartaz claims that the article is "a FORK of material that is already at the controversies of reddit page". The article contains significant new content about the community; the text is probably more than twice the length of the section of that page. Thirdly, Spartaz has claimed that "Since this is dead there is absolutely no prospect of this being discussed or documented further EXCEPT in the context of discussing Reddit controversy". This is a classic  argument, and also qualifies as #CRYSTAL. It is certainly possible that there may be more coverage of it, especially if one of the forums that served as its successor becomes prominent. "The correct location for this is therefore that page"; no it is not; I feel the level of importance of the event clearly merits a seperate page
— User:Hazarasp, 07:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:ONEVENT||WP:DEFUNCTS||WP:ATA (Wikipedia:Notability)