Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satya Brata Das
This is very clearly promotional/advertorial in intent, and claims nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough to override how weak the actual sourcing is. Writers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their books happen to be available for sale on Amazon; board members of organizations are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist; TEDx speakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their speech has been posted to YouTube; and on and so forth. Since the article was created by a user named "Edmontonpolicy", and the subject is a policy consultant in Edmonton, this is almost certainly an  — so I don't think copyvio is the clinching argument here, because he probably ''put'' both copies on both sites himself. But the fact that his notability hasn't been properly demonstrated in the first place is more definitive
— User:Bearcat, 16:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:AUTOBIO (Wikipedia:Autobiography)