Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariel Fernandez
The subject is well-known enough and there are plenty of sources to support , and I edited out the  aspects.   The only reason I would support deleting the article is that Ariel, the subject of the article (who was banned for socking and then came back later with yet more socks, which continued to add self-promotional material) monitors the article and, as recently happened, over-reacts and makes legal threats via yet more socks. (And he continues to play games as one can see above, with the post from "Maureen" saying "keep" while he writes again as "Ariel" saying "delete")   However, I don't think that a difficult article subject, is a valid reason to delete an article.  Because Ariel has been site-banned, his posts above should perhaps be deleted, but since the one that he owned-up to is reasonable in tone and it is useful to have his voice in the discussion, I think we should let it stand.  However, in my view we should delete future contributions if they become unreasonable or otherwise disruptive
— User:Jytdog, 15:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTABILITY||WP:PROMO (Wikipedia:Notability)