Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parodies of Harry Potter (2nd nomination)
Besides the reasons proposed for this nomination, the parodies themselves are not |notable. It's more than enough to mention that Harry Potter has been parodied in several media in the Harry Potter article with some examples. Shakespeare's work has been parodied several times but that is not a good reason to list every single parody that has existed that is not notable by itself. Moreover, the parodies should be mentioned in the original work where they were released, not in an article that list them independently. Most sources used are either to talk about how Harry Potter was referenced, not about the importance of the parody itself, or are descriptions of the parody without commentary or review as to why the parodies are notable. The article is a #Derivative_articles|derivative article, an |unnecessary split and an unneeded |content fork. This type of article is material for a OT#FANSITE|fansite but not for an encylopedia
— User:Jfgslo, 17:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:FICT||WP:AVOIDSPLIT||WP:CFORK||WP:NOT (Wikipedia:Notability)