Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erdős–Bacon number (3rd nomination)
for lack of a valid deletion rationale. Frivolity, uselessness, or "lack of scientific value" are not adequate reasons for deletion, and no case has been made that this is in any way a hoax. The ''Telegraph'' and ''USA Today'' articles already in the article give a clear case for  notability, and the additional sources found by Clarityfiend only strengthen that case
— User:David, 23:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)