Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimensions Magazine
The notability of a site is based on the existence of sources, not the current state of sourcing in the article. The issue regarding speedy deletion has been fixed, because the text is licensed as CC BY-SA 3.0 https://bbw.wiki/index.php?title=BBW_Wiki:About here. It does fulfill some points also through the book cited before in this thread, from Wikipedia:Notability_(media)#Newspapers,_magazines_and_journals|here. It has been cited multiple times in academic research, 10.1007/s10508-012-9925-7 and in books such as ISBN-10 1597190179. They have gotten requests for media attentions, but those were mostly rejected due to a negative bias. See https://www.dimensionsmagazine.com/threads/dimensions-in-the-news-or-not.90362/#post-1813423 here. If they would not have rejected them, there would be more sources. I'd argue this is a good case for . Note that I'm still working on adding more sources, so speedy delete doesn't give any room for improvements
— User:Throwawiki, 17:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IAR (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)