Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effects of Brexit on science and technology
as the article consists mostly of |original research based on |primary sources, mostly newspaper clippings and politicians' speeches ("on this and this day minister Hammond said...", "on this and this day some academics from some university wrote an open letter...", and so on). This is hardly surprising, because the subject relates to an ongoing process where secondary sources (analyses, compilations, reviews) do not yet exist. However, this fact does not absolve the article from violating  and . I do not think an original piece of writing that just synthesises the predictions appearing in public media is what an encyclopaedic article should be about
— User:Kashmiri, 16:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:OR||WP:PRIMARY||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOR (Wikipedia:No original research)