Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychiatric abuse
Idiosyncratic, non-encyclopedic, or agenda-driven compilations of individually notable incidents are a recipe for disaster. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid for an example of where this is headed. It's just a magnet for argumentation, |soapboxing, policy violations, etc on ''all'' sides. It will make the encyclopedia measurably worse and |more antagonistic. I've already !voted above, but I felt this to be worth repeating; the notable incidents here should be covered in more encyclopedic articles, and this particular editor-driven compilation of incidents should go. Otherwise I can almost guarantee it will be at ArbCom sooner or later, like the Allegations of apartheid series
— User:MastCell, 17:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:SOAP||WP:BATTLE (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)