Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Gorilla
I know there was some work in putting together a list of sources but I'm not convinced that they meet the guidelines in  and/or  and I don't believe they establish notability. Some are trivial mentions or inclusions in lists (such as 1. and 2.) I like 3. as it appears to be a good independent source but the article is mostly about the game developed by Pink Gorilla and not the company itself. I'd reject 4. as it would not meet the definition of a "reliable" source and a lot of content is user generated. 5. is an advertorial and is not independent as it extensively quotes Primary sources. 6. is a blog and is therefore also refected as a reliable source. And for me, 7. is an advertorial in a local publication
— User:HighKing, 13:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Notability)