Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDF-1 Macross
mainly as per DGG.  Arguments like "such cruft hurts Wikipedia" really put me off.  There are many articles on Wikipedia on which I would never ever spend my time reading, I just can't see why this entitles me to deny others from doing that.  As long as it is factual and meets the five pillars, (or could reasonably be made to meet the five pillars, especially ) it should stay.   sums up my attitude to the pages, but it is a terrible argument for deletion
— User:Power, 15:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:V||WP:IDONTLIKEIT (Wikipedia:Verifiability)