Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dysgenics (2nd nomination)
a glancing search yielded enough information for a stand-alone article as well as establishing notability. Nom's PROD rationale is clearly invalid, and the nom should, in my opinion, read 
— User:JavaHurricane, 10:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:NOTCLEANUP (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)