Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Tilton
of the "sources" presented here as being the best, one is a primary source, and the other is pretty obvious marketing fluff.  Neither are useful in demonstrating that this individual meets the .  I don't see much better in the sources used in the article, which are either not independent of the subject, or in niche publications that look to have somewhat dubious reliability
— User:Lankiveil, 02:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)