Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brief Chronicles
The call to delete states that "this does not meet otability (academic journals) or ." The discussion has repeatedly proved this to be in error. In over four days, no response has been given by those moving to delete to repeated questions about what would constitute notability, given that they claim the journal currently ''does not'' qualify. Attempts to prejudice the discussion with false speculations about motivations and collusion are documented. Use of atrocious spelling by those attempting to define what constitutes a notable academic journal are documented. Attempts to undermine the validity of comments in otability (academic journals) ignore the fundamental fact that the entire motion to delete is ''predicated on'' these comments ''as if'' they are standards for adjudication, and therefore if these are mooted, so is the original proposal, rendering the entire discussion irrelevant and logically defeating the motion to delete before it began. Let's all get on to more important things, like improving Wikipedia
— User:BenJonson, 00:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:N||WP:N||WP:N (Wikipedia:Notability)