Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottawa Community Housing Corporation
without prejudice against recreation in the future if someone can do better than this. Something like this would certainly be eligible to have a Wikipedia article if it could be |reliably sourced as clearing  and , but it's not automatically entitled to keep an unsourced article just because it exists — especially when that article essentially just summarizes content that can be gleaned directly from its own |self-published website about itself. The presence or absence of |reliable source coverage in ''media'', not the mere ability to metasource its existence to itself, is what determines whether an organization qualifies for a Wikipedia article or not
— User:Bearcat, 22:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)