Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Cleverley
This case received a hugely disproportionate amount of attention, just like Elizabeth Smart, that goes far above and beyond the scope of just another "missing and found dead".  For better or for worse, people attribute this to her being a white upper-middle-class blonde female that's not "supposed" to go missing.  Yes, Wikipedia is not a memorial, but when the http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10F17FE35540C738DDDA00894DF404482 New York Times, the http://www.kxmb.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=160454 Associated Press,http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/09/09/utah.student.body.ap/index.html CNN, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20680906/ MSNBC, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/09/national/main3245068.shtml CBS, and even the television show http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/brief.cfm?id=48336 America's Most Wanted pick it up, you can't sit with a straight face and say it's another "non-notable memorial".  The notion that the "associated press coverage was primary used to locate her" was fallacious since they continued to report on her after she was located.  '''I allege nominator is making a  - nominator and I were involved in an unrelated Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/%C3%9Cberplay|recent disagreement shortly before I created this article (another unsuccessful AfD where I alleged non-notability elsewhere) - this is potentially a bad faith "payback" nomination.  He has already attempted to speedy this article, which was quickly http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Camille_Cleverley&diff=158643331&oldid=158629611 overturned
— User:Reswobslc, 16:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:POINT (Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point)