Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biod
for lack of notability per , , .  I don't see any independent, reliable, secondary sources here at all — either in this (English) article, or in the corresponding Dutch article.  I also couldn't find any such sources in a Google search.  Simply expanding the article isn't enough to establish notability; you need to show multiple reliable sources that are '''not''' connected with the subject (i.e., not from the company, and not from fans of the company, and not from people who are trying to sell the company's products).  Has this company or its stuff been discussed in newspapers, consumer reporting magazines, or anything of that sort
— User:Richwales, 20:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS||WP:INDY||WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)