Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROM Bat Cave
Keep because this topic easily passes  with in-depth secondary coverage.http://www.thestar.com/life/parent/2010/02/24/the_rom_reopens_the_bat_cave.html http://torontoist.com/2010/02/rom_revamped_bat_cave/  http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2010/02/25/13028986.html http://www.insidetoronto.com/news-story/49091-the-bats-are-back-in-town-at-the-rom/  Speedy because the nom has given absolutely zero rationale as to how this topic is "Not notable" and the first two of the sources were already ''in'' the article at time of AfD.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ROM_Bat_Cave&oldid=639897772  Too much topic-specific content to be merged into the ROM article
— User:Oakshade, 22:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Notability)