Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British Army Regiments (2008)
tq|"They deleted my PROD"}} is not a DELREASON - and just goes to show how people are being trigger-happy with PROD and using it for controversial/improvable articles.  is against self-promotion? Why is this being cited here? Saying this fails  fails on the obvious referencing provided in the article which provides a force structure for the British army as a result of the review. Additional sources are available also (e.g., https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jwTMDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT129&dq=Royal+Tank+Regiment+2008&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiduZmAuP_sAhWBwuYKHf88AYwQ6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=Royal%20Tank%20Regiment%202008&f=false "The Armed Forces of the United Kingdom, 2007–2008", https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=QwTMDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT191&dq=Royal+Tank+Regiment+2008&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiduZmAuP_sAhWBwuYKHf88AYwQ6AEwBHoECAkQAg#v=onepage&q=Royal%20Tank%20Regiment%202008&f=false "The British Army, 2008–2009: A Pocket Guide") and failing to consider this also shows a potential  fail
— User:FOARP, 11:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPIP||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE (Wikipedia:Notability)