Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katarina Erlingson
County councillors are not automatically notable just because one or two sources can be shown to verify that they exist — for starters, one of the two sources here is her own "staff" profile on the council's own |self-published website, not a reliable or notability-supporting source, and while the other one is real media, it mentions her name but is not fundamentally ''about'' her (and even if we accepted it anyway, it still takes ''more'' than just ''one'' media source to get a politician into Wikipedia if their role isn't "inherently" notable.) The corresponding article in Swedish is even worse, being written like a résumé rather than an encyclopedia article and referenced ''only'' to the staff profile — literally the only reason I'm not nominating ''it'' for deletion is that I can't read or write Swedish in order to navigate their deletion process. And politicians in non-notable roles are also not extended notability just because of what political party they happen to be associated with, either: the notability test is not "members of a national Riksdag party, even if the person is personally just a local councillor in one of the counties", it is "the person is themselves a ''member of the Riksdag''". None of this, either the substance or the sourcing, is enough
— User:Bearcat, 14:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:SELFPUB (Wikipedia:Verifiability)