Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Turk
despite claims from last year about the references meaning the person meets notability they actually fail to discuss the subject in any significant details. Article at present clearly fails | not a C.V. If the article's subject is found to be important/significant enough for inclusion and that importance/significance can be verified by those more experienced than I than may I suggest a complete rewrite from a neutral point of view would be the place to start
— User:Jasynnash2, 16:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NOT (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)