Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Zone
doesn't pass : two sources are provided: the first is a non-independent primary source (blog of the show's host); the other could somewhat pass as a secondary source but misses broad coverage of the topic (does no more than more or less repeat the content of the blog page). A less than half-eligible secondary source (didn't invest further time in assessing possible ineligibility for reliability reasons) does not make "significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources". Plus all the  stuff we had lately with the host's PR agent. Looked at  but didn't see anything more redeeming there ("the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone
— User:Francis, 18:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:COIN||WP:NTV (Wikipedia:Notability)