Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Suárez controversies
Clearly doesn't violate BLP: It's written from a neutral point of view (it can't be helped that he has done many negative things, this is all factual, you're fooling yourself if you think otherwise), it's clearly all verifiable by highly reliable sources, and there's no original research whatsoever because every single sentence has been sourced. The fact that each previous incident comes up when he has done something shows it all ties in together; for a start, Otman Bakkal is quoted in a section completely disassociated from the incident involving him, and the previous incidents always came up when talking about the others, that's why each ban was longer than the others.Also it's not a content fork, it's a |split; I took into consideration the sheer volume of text necessary to fully expand each incident, because otherwise the main Luis Suárez article would be dominated by these four incidents and would become unreadable, and what is there currently is minor in regards to how big it was within his career - a full season worth of games banned for. And I'm not sure why incidents is in speech marks, it's highly disingenuous to suggest these aren't actual incidents
— User:RealDealBillMcNeal, 19:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SPLIT (Wikipedia:Splitting)