Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientific data withholding
Consider that this was nominated for deletion within the first 24 hours.  Keep the article (which already has established itself as legitimate and more informative in the 20 hours before this RfD was performed than many other articles that pass RfD.  The article is not an issue is the nominator prefers text to be his way, even on the Talk Page for the article he links to above http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Scientific_data_archiving&diff=117743690&oldid=117738995.  In fact, This article s/b  ("The nomination was unquestionably...disruption and nobody else recommends deleting it... Examples of this include obviously frivolous nominations...nominations which are made solely to provide a forum for disruption (e.g., a userpage of a contestant in a heated edit war by their opponent(s) solely for harassment)").  The only catch is the nominator's cadre will come and support deletion simply to thwart the speedy.  Nonetheless, this RfD is just another retaliation in a wide-reaching edit-war
— User:Mnyakko, 15:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SK (Wikipedia:Speedy keep)