Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrong number
The nominator asserts that the article is not capable of improvement but I see no evidence that this has been tried.  There was not, for example, a talk page for this article until I created one just now.  A brief perusal of the sources indicates that there is an extensive literature on the ''wrong number technique'' which has been used in numerous experiments studying behaviour when persons suppose that they are anonymous.  This alone makes the topic of considerable relevance to Wikipedia.  I suppose that there is coverage of other aspects of the topic too and there are so many thousands of sources to sift through that we have barely scratched the surface.  Wikipedia does not have a deadline and our |editing policy is to tolerate poor articles rather than to delete them out of sheer impatience
— User:Colonel, 17:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:IMPERFECT (Wikipedia:Editing policy)