Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Magazine
it is not a strong article, but it meets the  notability guideline for a publication, even as an important publication for a niche market.  In a previous discussion of this type on a novel aircraft in development, I recall an administrator pointing out to me that "even a balsa wood model airplane" might be able to meet  and have an article about it in Wikipedia, as long as it had coverage about it in other media.  Look at all the garage bands we have articles on in Wikipedia, or barely-beyond-self-published fantasy fictional works, with limited coverage in local online or home town newspapers.  Bitcoin Magazine and its sources are ''far'' above that rather low bar.  Merging it with the |BLP article of some notable previous author of the magazine makes no sense at all, and would be outside standard policy
— User:N2e, 02:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)