Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of computer standards
List scope is not too broad at all,in any case I'd like to remind that  is never a reason for deletion, but for ''reorganization'': the guideline says: ''Lists that are too general or too broad in scope have little value, '''unless they are split into sections'''. For example a list of brand names would be far too long to be of value. If you have an interest in listing brand names, try to limit the scope in some way (by product category, by country, by date, etc.). '''This is best done by sectioning the general page under categories.''' When entries in a category have grown enough to warrant a fresh list-article, they can be moved out to a new page, and be replaced by a See new list link. When all categories become links to lists, the page becomes a list repository or "List of lists" and the entries can be displayed as a bulleted list. '''For reference see Lists of people, which is made up of specific categorical lists.''''. That "popular standards get out of date" is completely irrelevant, because |notability is not temporary
— User:Cyclopia, 17:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:SALAT||WP:NTEMP (Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists)