Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Morningstar
It's very frustrating trying to find sources for this article.  I've searched extensively on Yahoo and Google and GoogleNews and I cannot find any evidence of this woman's notability.  Neither does the list of publishers given above check out for notability--one of them is so non-notable, in fact, that the website is down, while another is so non-notable that a website is merely promised for the future.  About the most we can say is that a human being named "Sally Morningstar" exists and that some of the books exist, and that she claims to be a witch--but as we all know, witches do not exist, and something that does not exist of course cannot be notable.  Unfortunately, the mere fact that this person and some of the books exist '''is not enough''' to confer notability.  Existence is not the same thing as notability, not by a longshot.  There is no evidence or claim out there that she is notable among the community of "witches"--a category of person that does not exist to begin with.  Please see '''What Wikipedia Is Not''' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information, which clearly states that '''merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia'''.  It is apparently true that a "Sally Morningstar" exists, but it has not been shown that she is notable, or even that she is considered notable by the other "witches."  For all we know, the improbable name "Sally Morningstar" may just be a pseudonym anyway, but even that much is impossible to determine through 
— User:Qworty, 14:21, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)