Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trank
as per nom and above. As  explains, non-notablity, while not a core policy like verifiability (), it is the basis for a number of guidelines for article inclusion which represent consensus opinions on Wikipedia (such as ), and can be arguably associated with official policy .  also explains that notablity is a controversial issue, but is frequently used as arguments for afd. Ignavus is perfectly justified to nominated these articles for deletion. While every Wikipedia user should take time to read up on policies and guidelines, its totally unnecessary and unjustified for ALIKIVAR to scold a new user like that - and on the basis of ALIKIVAR's own opinionated reading of Wikipedia guidelines as well. I would suggest that ALKIVAR read 
— User:Bwithh, 17:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:NN||WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:NOT||WP:NN||WP:BITE (Wikipedia:Notability)