Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Syring (2nd nomination)
per  and .  Had Syring been a notable person before jumping into this bizarre, awesome folly, 1) he would be worth having an article on in the first place, and 2) his opinions and the IRL-trolling incident they spawned would actually have been important.  He wasn't, and so he didn't, and so it wasn't (at least not very).  This is not a biographical article; this is an article on one particular, damning incident with enough of the surface trappings of a biographical article that it's possible someone might accidentally mistake it for the sum of a life.  In the long term, this event will fade into a footnote to James Zogby and the Arab American Institute, and so those are the articles where (sourced) mention of this incident should find a home, if anywhere.  Always when dealing with BLP issues on these private individuals who blunder onto the media's stage for their fifteen minutes of infamy, the question should not be, Is this not''able?'' (per ), but should instead be, Is this note''worthy?'' (per , the spirit of , and common sense
— User:Dynaflow, 10:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:ONEEVENT||WP:RECENT||WP:NOTE||WP:RECENT||WP:BLP (Wikipedia:Notability)