Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Magazine
I would ''like'' to keep this article, as I accept the argument from the essay  for presumptive notability based on extensive citation in reliable sources, including scholarly sources (and, unlike the essay itself, I would extend that to online as well as print magazines, the guideline  to the contrary notwithstanding—I think this is one of the situations where the commonsense-exception clause in the description of guidelines would apply). A number of the "keep" votes above appear to me to be based on similar reasoning. But even a presumptively notable topic still needs reliable sources if its page to be kept, and, like {{u|Cunard}} above, I have not had an easy time finding sources for this one. A large part of the reason is likely the one mentioned in : "when searching for sources on media outlets, the results are often pages produced by the outlet, making it difficult to find significant coverage in multiple sources
— NONE, NONE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: WP:NMEDIA||WP:WEB||WP:NMEDIA (Wikipedia:Notability)