Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Geick (2nd nomination)
Spent time tidying up this discussion for indentations and to clarify which are comment points so that it can be read easily (I have not touched any actual text). There is just not enough to confirm GNG. There are bits and pieces, but nothing that you can definitively point to.  Perhaps this will change in the future and he will increase notability, but more would be required in terms of significant independent  discussing him. If a new article re-appears with no improvement in RS, it should be speedily deleted
— User:Britishfinance, 17:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Stance: delete
Cited policy: WP:RS (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)