Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyscraperPage (4th nomination)
The previous AfD is nine years old, so referring to it seems, erm, out-of-date. On the other hand, the "keep" arguments from the 1st & 2nd AfD are even more pronounced now. Note that there are articles on 8 other Wikipedias and then there is the template {{tl|Skyscraperpage}} with more than 700 transclusions.  notwithstanding, deleting an article about such a widely used website seems unhelpful. Also: shouldn't Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skyscrapers have been notified? They list that site under "Resources
— User:Michael, 17:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Stance: keep
Cited policy: WP:OSE (Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions)