The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Jones.
The plaintiff sued defendant upon a $25,000' bond, guaranteeing the faithful performance of a contract by John E. Grady & Son for the construction of a dam and power house for plaintiff on Saluda River, in Greenville county, S. C.
The issues were by consent submitted to Judge Elydrick, without a jury, and judgment was rendered against defendant for $25,000'.
This being a case at law, it is conceded that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to review the findings of fact by the Circuit Court, where there is any testimony whatever in support of the same.
After careful consideration, we conclude that the findings of fact by Judge Hydrick, whose decree is herewith reported, have support in the testimony, and that upon the facts so found he properly adjudged the defendant was liable upon the bond.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
June 18, 1909.
Per Curiam.
After careful consideration the Court is unable to discover that any material question of law or fact has been overlooked or disregarded.
It is, therefore, ordered that the petition herein be dismissed and the order staying remittitur heretofore granted be revoked.