LEGAL DOCUMENT

Case: Rita T. BEAULIEU v. State of Rhode Island/DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Citation: 598 A.2d 1375
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1991-11-14
Docket Number: No. 91-36-Appeal
Pages: 1375–1376
Volume: 598
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series

Parties: Rita T. BEAULIEU v. State of Rhode Island/DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

Rita T. BEAULIEU v. State of Rhode Island/DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
No. 91-36-Appeal.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Nov. 14, 1991.
John Harnett, Providence, for plaintiff.
William F. Buckley, Wakefield and Robert A. Millerick, Warwick, for defendant.

ORDER
This case came before the court for oral argument pursuant to an order directing the plaintiff, Rita T. Beaulieu, to show cause why her petition for certiorari should not be denied.
After hearing the arguments and reviewing the memoranda of counsel, this court is of the opinion that no cause has been shown. Specifically, we find that the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Court acted within its discretion in not awarding twelve (12) percent interest on retroactive compensation benefits to plaintiff.
General Laws 1956 (1986 Reenactment) § 28-35-12(c) allows the Workers’ Compensation Commission to reduce or eliminate the amount of interest to be awarded if the underlying proceedings were unduly delayed by or at the request of the employee or her attorney. In not awarding twelve percent interest, the Appellate Division acted within the discretion provided by § 28-35-12(c). The record shows that an approximately six month delay in removing the action from the nisi calendar is attributable to the plaintiff, and is therefore a sufficient basis to deny the petitioned interest award.
We also find that the Commission acted within its discretion in making its award for attorney fees. Accordingly, plaintiff's petition for certiorari is denied and the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court is affirmed.