LEGAL DOCUMENT

Case: Anthony SCIACCA, et al. v. Gloria CARUSO, et al.
Citation: 754 A.2d 102
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 2000-02-11
Docket Number: No. 99-444-A
Pages: 102–102
Volume: 754
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series

Parties: Anthony SCIACCA, et al. v. Gloria CARUSO, et al.

Anthony SCIACCA, et al. v. Gloria CARUSO, et al.
No. 99-444-A.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Feb. 11, 2000.
Joseph A. Sciacca, Cranston.
Robert S. Ciresi, North Providence, John M. Verdecchia, Cranston.

ORDER
The plaintiffs, Anthony Sciacca, Richard Loffredo, Silvio Molhcone, and Ernest Be-rube, have appealed from an order of the Superior Court denying their appeal from a decision of the Johnston zoning board of review. Review of such a zoning board decision may only be secured by petition for common law writ of certiorari. See, e.g. Gabriele v. Rocchio, 665 A.2d 566, 566 (R.I.1995) (per curiam); Blackstone Park Improvement Ass’n v. State, 448 A.2d 1233, 1241 n. 6 (R.I.1982); Bassi v. Zoning Board of Review of Providence, 107 R.I. 702, 705-06, 271 A.2d 210 (1970).
Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ appeal is denied and dismissed as procedurally improper.