LEGAL DOCUMENT

Case: The Narragansett Electric Company v. William W. Harsch et al.
Citation: 116 R.I. 907
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1976-02-26
Docket Number: M. P. No. 75-218
Pages: 907–907
Volume: 116
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports

Parties: The Narragansett Electric Company v. William W. Harsch et al.

February 26, 1976
M. P. No. 75-218.
The Narragansett Electric Company v. William W. Harsch et al.
Edwards & Angell, Knight Edwards, Edward F. Hindle, Deming E. Sherman for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, R. Daniel Prentiss, Special Asst. Attorney General, Roberts & Willey Incorporated, Dennis J. Roberts II, for Consumers’ Council, for respondents.

The petitioner’s motion that the Attorney General be disallowed from filing a brief in the within case is denied without prejudice to raising the issue in its brief and in oral argument.
Counsel for the parties are ordered to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments, in addition to other questions presented, the question of whether the Attorney General represented the public or the Public Utilities Commission and whether or not the Public Utilities Commission is a proper party to this appeal. See Hassell v. Zoning Bd. of Review of E. Providence, 108 R. I. 349, 275 A.2d 646 (1971).