LEGAL DOCUMENT

Case: Adam Farkas v. Albert M. Sadler et al.
Citation: 117 R.I. 950
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1976-12-03
Docket Number: Appeal No. 75-30
Pages: 950–950
Volume: 117
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports

Parties: Adam Farkas v. Albert M. Sadler et al.

December 3, 1976.
Appeal No. 75-30.
Adam Farkas, plaintiff, pro se. Keenan, Rice, Dolan, Reardon & Kiernan, Leonard A. Kiernan, Jr., James A. Currier, for Albert M. Sadler and Elizabeth Sadler, defendants. Hanson, Curran, Bowen & Parks, Kenneth R. Neal, for Mary Adams.
Adam Farkas v. Albert M. Sadler et al.

Case is assigned to the calendar for December 13, 1976, 9:30 a.m. for oral argument. The plaintiff will be expected to show cause why his appeal should not be summarily disposed of because of this Court’s previous statement that in situations such as this the Court will not disturb a finding of the trial justice unless he was clearly wrong. Labree v. Major, 111 R.I. 657, 306 A.2d 808 (1973). He should also be prepared to discuss in what manner the trial justice overlooked or misconceived material evidence on a material point and was clearly wrong. Malinowski v. Zalzal, 113 R.I. 90, 317 A.2d 875 (1974).