LEGAL DOCUMENT

Case: Angelo Roucanos et al. v. John De Mizio et al.
Citation: 116 R.I. 937
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1976-05-20
Docket Number: Appeal No. 75-327
Pages: 937–937
Volume: 116
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports

Parties: Angelo Roucanos et al. v. John De Mizio et al.

Appeal No. 75-327.
Angelo Roucanos et al. v. John De Mizio et al.
Leo T. Connors, George A. Pliakas, for plaintiffs. Francis v. Reynolds, Anthony F. DeMarco, for defendants.

Appeal of plaintiffs is based on an alleged error in the instructions to the jury. The plaintiffs neither objected to those instructions nor requested contrary ones. Absent such request or objection, they are foreclosed from challenging the instructions given, DeSimone v. Manzi, 114 R. I. 30, 327 A.2d 840 (1974). See also Super. R. Civ. P., 51(b). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to affirm the judgment below pursuant to Rule 16(g) is granted.