LEGAL DOCUMENT

Case: Arthur Langelo and Celia A. Langelo v. Gardner A. Greenhalgh
Citation: 116 R.I. 911
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1976-03-11
Docket Number: Appeal No. 76-19
Pages: 911–912
Volume: 116
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports

Parties: Arthur Langelo and Celia A. Langelo v. Gardner A. Greenhalgh.

Appeal No. 76-19.
Arthur Langelo and Celia A. Langelo v. Gardner A. Greenhalgh.

Defendant moves to reconsider his motion to affirm which was recently denied. The basis for the motion to reconsider is a change of circumstances in that the case of one of the plaintiffs, Arthur F. Langelo, has now been dismissed by mutual agreement of the parties.
Beals & Di Fiore, Albert Di Fiore, for plaintiffs. Hanson, Curran, Bowen & Parks, David P. Whitman, for defendant.
Since court would have granted the motion to affirm but for the claim of Arthur F. Langelo, the defendant’s motion to reconsider is granted and on reconsideration the motion to affirm the judgment below is granted.