LEGAL DOCUMENT

Case: Herbert M. Kimball, Admr. vs. Mary Kelly et al.
Citation: 66 R.I. 169
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1941-02-20
Docket Number: 
Pages: 169–170
Volume: 66
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports

Parties: Herbert M. Kimball, Admr. vs. Mary Kelly et al.

Herbert M. Kimball, Admr. vs. Mary Kelly et al.
FEBRUARY 20, 1941.
Present: Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker and Condon, JJ.

Per Curiam.
After the filing of our opinion the complainant, by leave of court, filed a motion for reargument. We have carefully considered said motion and the reasons- assigned therefor.
Charles R. Easton, for complainant.
James J. Fogarty, Jr., Voigt, Wright, Munroe & Clason, for respondents.
However, as the motion contains no matter which was not fully considered and passed upon before the filing of our opinion, the motion is denied and dismissed.