Case: WILLIAM M. AHIA, A. R. CUNHA, BEN HOLLINGER AND E. W. QUINN, AS CITIZENS AND TAX-PAYERS AND AS QUALIFIED AND ACTING SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND COLLECTIVELY CONSTITUTING A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAID CITY AND COUNTY, v. LEWIS ABSHIRE
Abbreviation: Ahia v. Abshire
Court: Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1924-05-09
Docket Number: No. 1534
Citation: 27 Haw. 791
Volume: 27
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Parties: WILLIAM M. AHIA, A. R. CUNHA, BEN HOLLINGER AND E. W. QUINN, AS CITIZENS AND TAX-PAYERS AND AS QUALIFIED AND ACTING SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND COLLECTIVELY CONSTITUTING A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAID CITY AND COUNTY, v. LEWIS ABSHIRE.
Pages: 791–791

WILLIAM M. AHIA, A. R. CUNHA, BEN HOLLINGER AND E. W. QUINN, AS CITIZENS AND TAX-PAYERS AND AS QUALIFIED AND ACTING SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND COLLECTIVELY CONSTITUTING A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAID CITY AND COUNTY, v. LEWIS ABSHIRE.
No. 1534.
Reserved Questions from Circuit Judge First Circuit.
Hon. R. J. O’Brien, Judge.
Broion, Gristy & Davis for petitioners.
Smith é Wild for respondent.
Submitted April 10, 1924.
Decided May 9, 1924.
Peters, C. J., Perry and Lindsay, JJ.

Per Ouriam.
The question, reserved, “Should the demurrer be sustained,” is answered in the affirmative upon the authority of Ahia v. Cain, 27 Haw. 770.