Case: MAYEMORI KANA AND KAMATO MAYEMORI, SUCCESSORS TO MAYEMORI KANA, KAMATO MAYEMORI, NAKAMURA KAMESO AND OYATA KAMADA v. HAKALAU PLANTATION COMPANY, LIMITED
Abbreviation: Mayemori Kana v. Hakalau Plantation Co.
Court: Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1922-03-01
Docket Number: No. 1372
Citation: 26 Haw. 330
Volume: 26
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Parties: MAYEMORI KANA AND KAMATO MAYEMORI, SUCCESSORS TO MAYEMORI KANA, KAMATO MAYEMORI, NAKAMURA KAMESO AND OYATA KAMADA v. HAKALAU PLANTATION COMPANY, LIMITED.
Pages: 330–330

MAYEMORI KANA AND KAMATO MAYEMORI, SUCCESSORS TO MAYEMORI KANA, KAMATO MAYEMORI, NAKAMURA KAMESO AND OYATA KAMADA v. HAKALAU PLANTATION COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 1372.
Error to Circuit Judge Fourth Circuit. Hon. J. W. Thompson, Judge.
Argued February 28, 1922.
Decided March 1, 1922.
Coke, C. J., Kemp and Edings, JJ.
J. 8. Ferry for plaintiffs in error.
C. 8. Carlsniith for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:
This is a suit in equity instituted to compel tbe respondent to account to complainants for tbe amount of a bonus alleged to be due complainants on tbe sale of a sugar crop. Tbe complainants admit tbe payment to them of tbe full amount of tbe purchase price of tbe sugar but now claim a large additional sum by way of bonus. Tbe judge of tbe court below at tbe conclusion of tbe bearing found in favor of tbe respondent and dismissed tbe bill of complaint.
Little need be said in disposing of tbe cause. Tbe respondent bought complainants’ sugar crop and made complete payment therefor. Tbe record fails to establish any contract either express or implied which would in any way obligate tbe respondent to pay tbe complainant's any additional amount either by way of bonus or otherwise. Tbe record before us divulges no claim against the respondent enforceable either at law or in equity.
Tbe decree of tbe court below is affirmed.