Case: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON fka Bank of New York, Not In Its Individual Capacity but solely as Trustee for Benefit of Certificate Holders of CWMBS 2006-10 Trust, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-10, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. R. ONAGA, INC., A HAWAI'I CORPORATION, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, and Robert Nisperos Marquez; Marlyn Miranda Marquez; Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc., solely as nominee for Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC, a Hawai'i corporation; Department of Taxation, State of Hawai'i; United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees, and Lyle Anthony Ferrara and Linda Susan Ferrara, Petitioners/Intervenors; R. Onaga, Inc., a Hawai'i corporation, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, v. Robert Nisperos Marquez; Marlyn Miranda Marquez; Bank of New York Mellon, Trustee; Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc.; Department of Taxation, State of Hawai'i; Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, U.S.A., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees., and Lyle Anthony Ferrara and Linda Susan Ferrara, Petitioners/Intervenors
Abbreviation: Bank of New York Mellon v. R. Onaga, Inc.
Court: Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 2017-08-22
Docket Number: Civil No. 11-1-2095; Civil No. 12-1-1758; SCWC-14-0000426
Citation: 140 Haw. 403
Volume: 140
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Parties: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON fka Bank of New York, Not In Its Individual Capacity but solely as Trustee for Benefit of Certificate Holders of CWMBS 2006-10 Trust, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-10, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. R. ONAGA, INC., A HAWAI'I CORPORATION, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, and Robert Nisperos Marquez; Marlyn Miranda Marquez; Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc., solely as nominee for Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC, a Hawai'i corporation; Department of Taxation, State of Hawai'i; United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees, and Lyle Anthony Ferrara and Linda Susan Ferrara, Petitioners/Intervenors. R. Onaga, Inc., a Hawai'i corporation, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, v. Robert Nisperos Marquez; Marlyn Miranda Marquez; Bank of New York Mellon, Trustee; Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc.; Department of Taxation, State of Hawai'i; Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, U.S.A., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees., and Lyle Anthony Ferrara and Linda Susan Ferrara, Petitioners/Intervenors.
Pages: 403–404

400 P.3d 604
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON fka Bank of New York, Not In Its Individual Capacity but solely as Trustee for Benefit of Certificate Holders of CWMBS 2006-10 Trust, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-10, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. R. ONAGA, INC., A HAWAI'I CORPORATION, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, and Robert Nisperos Marquez; Marlyn Miranda Marquez; Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc., solely as nominee for Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC, a Hawai'i corporation; Department of Taxation, State of Hawai'i; United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees, and Lyle Anthony Ferrara and Linda Susan Ferrara, Petitioners/Intervenors. R. Onaga, Inc., a Hawai'i corporation, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, v. Robert Nisperos Marquez; Marlyn Miranda Marquez; Bank of New York Mellon, Trustee; Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc.; Department of Taxation, State of Hawai'i; Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, U.S.A., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees., and Lyle Anthony Ferrara and Linda Susan Ferrara, Petitioners/Intervenors.
(Civil No. 11-1-2095)
(Civil No. 12-1-1758)
SCWC-14-0000426
Supreme Court of Hawai'i.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 22, 2017.
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kim, in place of McKenna, J., recused)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Respondeni/Defendant-Appellant R. Ona-ga, Inc., timely filed a motion for reconsideration (Motion) on August 11, 2017, asking this court to reconsider our August 3, 2017 opinion (Opinion).
This court, having reviewed the Motion, together with the Opinion, and the records and files in this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is denied.