Case: Young Hin, Wong Tai, Wong Wah, Chu Lum Chee, Chu Kow, Young Lin, Young Chong, Lam Tai, Chu King, Sam Sun, Lee Wo, Chan Wing, Ah Sun, Chan Sing, Lung Yee, Chan Hang, Hin York, Lee Chin, See Sing, See Chong, Chai Lep Sing and Chu Chee, Plaintiffs in Error, v. H. Hackfeld and Company, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation and Honokaa Sugar Company, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation, Defendants in Error
Abbreviation: Young Hin v. H. Hackfeld & Co.
Court: Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1905-01-28
Docket Number: No. 64
Citation: 16 Haw. 790
Volume: 16
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Parties: Young Hin, Wong Tai, Wong Wah, Chu Lum Chee, Chu Kow, Young Lin, Young Chong, Lam Tai, Chu King, Sam Sun, Lee Wo, Chan Wing, Ah Sun, Chan Sing, Lung Yee, Chan Hang, Hin York, Lee Chin, See Sing, See Chong, Chai Lep Sing and Chu Chee, Plaintiffs in Error, v. H. Hackfeld and Company, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation and Honokaa Sugar Company, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation, Defendants in Error.
Pages: 790–790

No. 64.
Young Hin, Wong Tai, Wong Wah, Chu Lum Chee, Chu Kow, Young Lin, Young Chong, Lam Tai, Chu King, Sam Sun, Lee Wo, Chan Wing, Ah Sun, Chan Sing, Lung Yee, Chan Hang, Hin York, Lee Chin, See Sing, See Chong, Chai Lep Sing and Chu Chee, Plaintiffs in Error, v. H. Hackfeld and Company, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation and Honokaa Sugar Company, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation, Defendants in Error.
Writ of error to the district magistrate of Honokaa, island of Hawaii.
Submitted January 3, 1905.
Decided January 28, 1905.
Lyle A. Dickey for plaintiffs in error.
C. Brown, F. E. Thompson and C. F. Clemons for defendants in error.

Per curiam:
The writ of error is dismissed, following decision this day made in another case between the same parties.