Case: KING'S ALLEY COMPANY, a Partnership, dba KING'S ALLEY WAIKIKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIAMOND PARKING, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant-Appellant
Abbreviation: King's Alley Co. v. Diamond Parking, Inc.
Court: Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1976-02-20
Docket Number: NO. 5666
Citation: 56 Haw. 596
Volume: 56
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Parties: KING’S ALLEY COMPANY, a Partnership, dba KING’S ALLEY WAIKIKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIAMOND PARKING, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant-Appellant
Pages: 596–596

KING’S ALLEY COMPANY, a Partnership, dba KING’S ALLEY WAIKIKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIAMOND PARKING, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant-Appellant
NO. 5666
FEBRUARY 20, 1976
RICHARDSON, C.J., KOBAYASHI, OGATA, MENOR AND KIDWELL, JJ.
Jared H. Jossem and Richard F. Liebman (Torkildson, Katz & Conahan of counsel) for defendant-appellant, cross appellee
William J. Shannon (Damon, Shigekane, Key & Char of counsel) for plaintiff-appellee, cross appellant

Per Curiam.
This is an appeal by the defendant and a cross appeal by the plaintiff.
In an action to collect arrearages in rental payment instituted by the plaintiff, the trial court gave judgment to the plaintiff in a lesser amount than claimed by the plaintiff.
Upon hearing the oral arguments and reading the briefs of both parties, and having reviewed the record herein, we are of the opinion that the errors alleged by both plaintiff and defendant do not merit a reversal of the judgment below.
However, this per curiam opinion is without prejudice to defendant’s alleged claim for relief under HRS § 480-2.
Affirmed.