Case: KAPAIA STORE, LIMITED, v. MANUEL S. HENRIQUES, DEFENDANT; SOCIEDADE PORTUGUEZA DE ST. ANTONIO BENEFICENTE DE HAWAII, GARNISHEE
Abbreviation: Kapaia Store, Ltd. v. Henriques
Court: Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1935-10-08
Docket Number: No. 2218
Citation: 33 Haw. 575
Volume: 33
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Parties: KAPAIA STORE, LIMITED, v. MANUEL S. HENRIQUES, DEFENDANT; SOCIEDADE PORTUGUEZA DE ST. ANTONIO BENEFICENTE DE HAWAII, GARNISHEE.
Pages: 575–576

KAPAIA STORE, LIMITED, v. MANUEL S. HENRIQUES, DEFENDANT; SOCIEDADE PORTUGUEZA DE ST. ANTONIO BENEFICENTE DE HAWAII, GARNISHEE.
No. 2218.
Filed September 19, 1935.
Decided October 8, 1935.
Coke, C. J., Banks and Peters, JJ.

Per Curiam.
Counsel for appellant has intei'posed a petition for rehearing. The petition is not supported by a certificate of counsel as required by section 5 of the rules of this court, for Avhich reason it should be denied. Hinds v. Keith, 57 Fed. 10. While our rule provides that a petition for a rehearing be accompanied by certificate of counsel, no set form of language is prescribed. The federal rule requires that a petition for rehearing be supported by certificate of counsel to the effect that the petition is presented in good faith and not for delay. 8 Hughes Fed. Prac., § 5641. Such a certificate would, of course, meet the requirements of our rule. In the present case, however, no certificate of merit of any hind accompanies the petition. We will not, however, rest our dismissal of the petition solely upon the failure of counsel to observe the rules of court. The petition is both defective in form and devoid of merit and is therefore denied.
L. A. Dickey for the petition.