Case: STATE OF HAWAII, BY SHIRO KASHIWA, ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL (FORMERLY TERRITORY OF HAWAII, BY EDWARD N. SYLVA, ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL) v. GEORGE M. CONEY; GERTRUDE FLORENCE CONEY; MARTHA M. CONEY; WILLIAM A. CONEY; CLARISSA P. C. GERDES; SCHUMAN CARRIAGE COMPANY, LIMITED
Abbreviation: State v. Coney
Court: Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1962-07-26
Docket Number: No. 4197
Citation: 46 Haw. 50
Volume: 46
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Parties: STATE OF HAWAII, BY SHIRO KASHIWA, ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL (FORMERLY TERRITORY OF HAWAII, BY EDWARD N. SYLVA, ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL) v. GEORGE M. CONEY; GERTRUDE FLORENCE CONEY; MARTHA M. CONEY; WILLIAM A. CONEY; CLARISSA P. C. GERDES; SCHUMAN CARRIAGE COMPANY, LIMITED.
Pages: 50–50

STATE OF HAWAII, BY SHIRO KASHIWA, ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL (FORMERLY TERRITORY OF HAWAII, BY EDWARD N. SYLVA, ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL) v. GEORGE M. CONEY; GERTRUDE FLORENCE CONEY; MARTHA M. CONEY; WILLIAM A. CONEY; CLARISSA P. C. GERDES; SCHUMAN CARRIAGE COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 4197.
July 26, 1962.
Tsukiyama, C.J., Wirtz, J., Circuit Judge Tashiro in Place of Cassidy, J., Disqualified, Circuit Judge • Monden in Place of Lewis, J., Disqualified, and Circuit Judge King in Place of Mizuha, J., Disqualified.
D. N. Ingman for defendants-appellants’ petition.
Robert K. Richardson (Shiro Kashiwa, Attorney General) for plaintiff-appellee’s petition.

Per Curiam.
The defendants-appellants and the plaintiff-appellee have filed separate petitions for rehearing in the above-entitled canse.
The contentions set forth in the respective petitions have been carefully examined and considered. The court finds that the points presented are not new, having been fully briefed and argued by counsel and considered by this court in its decision.
The petitions are therefore denied.