flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: him to put them on top of the counter.” After defendant complied with the order, the officer began patting down defendant and asked him if he had any weapons. Defendant admitted that he had “some knives,” though he claimed not to know where. The officer eventually found four knives, a digital scale, two syringes, and a small rock of methamphetamine on defendant. On appeal, defendant contends that, when the officer ordered him to place his hands on the counter, he was unlawfully seized, or stopped, in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The state acknowledges that the officer stopped defendant at that moment. See State v. Ruiz, 196 Or App 324, 327, 101 P3d 824 (2004), rev den, 338 Or 363 (2005) (<HOLDING>). The state contends, however, that the stop Options: A. holding that the encounter between an officer and the defendant did not rise to the level of a terry stop until the defendant gave the officer his license and the officer informed the defendant that he was going to be given a patdown B. holding that an officer stopped the defendant when he ordered the defendant to take his hand out of his pocket C. holding that defendant was not resident of his mothers household even though his drivers license listed his mothers address and he received mail there because he expressed a belief that his residence was in a different location than his mothers home he rented and occupied his own residence and he testified that he was only living with his mother after expiration of his lease until he could find another place to live D. holding that defendant was seized where the officer told defendant that she knew that he was on probation defendant admitted to the officer that he had given her a false name and defendant was asked for consent to search a backpack because a reasonable inference was that defendant was the subject of a continuing investigation and his or her freedom of movement had been significantly restricted by the officers show of authority E. holding that the officer acted within the scope of his authority in requiring the defendant stopped in middle lane of traffic to exit his vehicle

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that an officer stopped the defendant when he ordered the defendant to take his hand out of his pocket
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the term of Executive’s employment, and excluding any periods of vacation and sick leave to which Executive is entitled, Executive agrees to devote substantially all of his business time to the business and affairs of the Company and, to the extent necessary to discharge the responsibilities assigned to Executive hereunder, to use Executive’s reasonable best efforts to perform faithfully, effectively and efficiently such responsibilities. During the term of Executive’s employment, it shall not be a violation of this Agreement for Executive to (1) serve on corporate, civic or charitable boards or committees, (2) deliver lectures or fulfill speaking engagements, and (3) manage personal investments, so long as such activities do not interfere with the performance of Executive’s responsibilities as an employee of the Company in accordance with this Agreement.

assistant: Duties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: issue that does not generally warrant federal jurisdiction. Empire Healthchoice, 547 U.S. at 701, 126 S.Ct. 2121. Second, if the exemption provisions were sufficient to support federal jurisdiction, it would follow that any action brought under a state consumer-protection statute with such a provision would be subject to removal. Such a result would plainly disturb the “con-gressionally approved balance of federal and state judicial responsibilities,” Grable, 545 U.S. at 314, 125 S.Ct. 2363, as “the long history of state common-law and statutory remedies against ... unfair business practices” makes “plain that this is an area traditionally regulated by the States,” California v. ARC Am. Corp., 490 U.S. 93, 101, 109 S.Ct. 1661, 104 L.Ed.2d 86 (1989); cf. Gunn, 133 S.Ct. at 1068 (<HOLDING>). In fact, CRARA itself honors that “long Options: A. holding that the fourth amendment right implicated in a malicious prosecution action is the right to be free of unreasonable seizure of the person B. recognizing exception to the exhaustion doctrine where the states highest court has explicitly and recently addressed the precise issue advanced by the petitioner C. holding that the fourth amendment and the exclusionary rules are not implicated by a private search D. holding that federal jurisdiction would run afoul of grables fourth requirement where the issue implicated an area traditionally addressed by the states E. holding that the fourth amendment is implicated by the withdrawal of blood to test its alcohol content

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that federal jurisdiction would run afoul of grables fourth requirement where the issue implicated an area traditionally addressed by the states
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: interest” at issue here because “[pjursuant to the Treaty of 1866 and the Thirteenth Amendment, the Cherokee Nation has no authority to treat its Freedmen citizens as anything less than full equals.” Freedmen’s Opp’n to Crittenden’s Mot. Dismiss [Dkt. # 123] at 14. By raising this argument to eviscerate the Nation’s claim of prejudice, the Freedmen are asking the Court to reach the merits of their claims against the Nation. This the Court cannot do. Indeed, the Tenth Circuit has squarely rejected a similar argum pelling claim of sovereign immunity” and finds that the Nation’s interests would be prejudiced if the case were to proceed in its absence. Republic of Philippines, 553 U.S. at 869, 128 S.Ct. 2180; see also Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Norton, 248 F.3d 993, 1001 (10th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>) (quoting Davis, 192 F.3d at 960) (internal Options: A. recognizing that tribal sovereign immunity extends to agencies and subdivisions of the tribe B. recognizing a strong presumption favoring arbitrability C. holding that there is a strong policy favoring dismissal for nonjoinder due to tribal sovereign immunity but that rule 19b factors must still be considered D. holding that state did not have jurisdiction over tribe where tribe paid into workers compensation program but had not waived sovereign immunity E. recognizing the strong policy favoring dismissal when a court cannot join a tribe because of sovereign immunity

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing the strong policy favoring dismissal when a court cannot join a tribe because of sovereign immunity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: over visitation with child conceived by one, according to agreement between them, through artificial insemination). Susan correctly notes that courts in other jurisdictions have applied the particular paternity presumption she asserts — the “holding out provision” — equally to mothers. See, e.g., Chatterjee v. King, 280 P.3d 283, 293 (N.M. 2012). We note that those jurisdictions had statutory provisions, more specific than ours, instructing that their paternity “presumptions are to be read in a gender-neutral manner insofar as practicable in an action to determine ... the existence of a mother and child relationship.” Frazier v. Goudschaal, 295 P.3d 542, 559 (Kan. 2013) (Biles, J., concurring in part) (quotation omitted); see Elisa B. v. Superior Court, 117 P.3d 660, 665 (Cal. 2005) (<HOLDING>); In re S.N.V., 284 P.3d 147, 151 (Colo. Ct. Options: A. holding that a mother and her two children failed to establish a 1983 claim where there was no evidence that threats made to the mother were directly aimed at the relationship between parent and child B. holding that a child was not barred by a former statute of limitations applicable to actions to establish the existence of a father and child relationship when the current action was to establish the nonexistence of a father and child relationship and the presumed father no longer persisted in maintaining paternity C. holding biological father responsible under uniform parentage act for back child support notwithstanding stepparents support of child D. holding that woman was presumed mother under uniform parentage acts upa provision presuming paternity based upon receiving the child into ones home and holding out child as ones own where upa expressly provides that in determining the existence of a mother and child relationship insofar as practicable the provisions of this part applicable to the father and child relationship apply quotation and brackets omitted E. holding that evidence was sufficient to support trial courts best interest finding where mother allowed child to be in contact with individual who had physically abused her mother was not capable of caring for child on her own mother admitted at trial she had not found stable employment and child was doing well in her current placement

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that woman was presumed mother under uniform parentage acts upa provision presuming paternity based upon receiving the child into ones home and holding out child as ones own where upa expressly provides that in determining the existence of a mother and child relationship insofar as practicable the provisions of this part applicable to the father and child relationship apply quotation and brackets omitted
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: a firearm) was possessed, increase [the offense level] by two levels.” USSG § 2Dl.l(b)(l)(A). Application note 3 of the Commentary to § 2D1.1 explains: “[T]he adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense. For example, the enhancement would not be applied if the defendant, arrested at his residence, had an unloaded hunting rifle in the closet.” We have consistently held that in order for § 2Dl.l(b)(l) to apply, the government must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a dangerous weapon was present when the crimes were committed, and that it was not clearly improbable that the weapon had some nexus with the crim inal activity. See United States v. Shields, 44 F.3d 673, 674-75 (8th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Bost, 968 F.2d 729, Options: A. holding that unloaded firearms qualify for this enhancement B. recognizing firearms as common tools of the drug trade C. holding anticipatory warrant for search of defendants home was invalid because facts made known to magistrate did not establish at time warrant was issued the required nexus between the contraband to be seized which was mailed to defendants post office box and defendants home D. holding that a city which brought an action for forfeiture of firearms recovered from a drug suspects residence was collaterally estopped from introducing evidence of drug possession thus it could not prove the firearms were used in drug transactions and could not forfeit them E. holding enhancement not appropriate because firearms were seized from defendants home thirtyseven days after last known drug sale occurred

assistant: The best answer is E. holding enhancement not appropriate because firearms were seized from defendants home thirtyseven days after last known drug sale occurred
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment, the LLC Agreement as amended hereby and those other documents expressly referred to herein or therein embody the complete agreement and understanding among the parties and supersede and preempt any prior understandings, agreements or representations by or among the parties, written or oral, which may have related to the subject matter hereof in any way.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: approved by Congress, via the IRC, to adjust the bare minimum exemption amount of $2,000 for inflation. A reasonable person of ordinary intelligence, if he did not want to avail himself of the IRS documents and notices publishing the applicable exemption amounts, would consult the CPI and make the necessary calculations to determine his gross income for tax purposes. See Pond v. Comm’r, 211 Fed.Appx. 749, 752 (10th Cir.2007) (unpublished) (explaining that the IRC’s provision of a specific number, $2000, and a statutory formula for adjusting that number, adequately defines the exemption amount and permits a taxpayer to be penalized for noncompliance); see also United States v. Priest, Nos. 06-10438, 06-10447, 06-10448, 2007 WL 1961885, at *2 (9th Cir. July 5, 2007) (unpublished mem.) (<HOLDING>). B. ' Whether the Denial of the Defense’s Jury Options: A. holding that tax exemption for church property does not violate establishment clause B. holding that the alleged imprecision caused by incorporating the cpi in determining a statutorily provided exemption does not void as a matter of law the obligation to file a tax return C. holding act qualifies as exemption statute under exemption 3 D. holding that the offense requires that the return be false as to a material matter E. holding one who claims tax exemption has burden of showing entitlement to exemption

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the alleged imprecision caused by incorporating the cpi in determining a statutorily provided exemption does not void as a matter of law the obligation to file a tax return
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding solely upon the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. Each of the parties hereto hereby agrees that this Agreement is not intended to create any rights of third party beneficiaries.

assistant: Binding Effects
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The outstanding principal balance of this Note shall bear interest (computed on the basis of a 360-day year, actual days elapsed) at a fluctuating rate per annum determined by Bank to be two and eighty-five hundredths of one percent (2.85%) above Daily One Month LIBOR in effect from time to time. Bank is hereby authorized to note the date and interest rate applicable to this Note and any payments made thereon on Bank's books and records (either manually or by electronic entry) and/or on any schedule attached to this Note, which notations shall be prima facie evidence of the accuracy of the information noted.

assistant: Interests
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The agreements in this Section shall survive the resignation of the Administrative Agent, the L/C Issuer, the Swing Line Lender, the Alternative Currency Fronting Lender, the replacement of any Lender, the termination of the Aggregate Revolving Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all the other Obligations.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: Visiting the Court | Touring the Building | Exhibitions Search: All Documents Docket Enter Search Text: Opinions Latest Slip Opinions Opinions Relating to Orders In-Chambers Opinions Slip opinions - Earlier Terms Counsel Listings Bound Volumes Media Files Related to Opinions Oral Arguments Supreme Court Calendar (PDF) (October Term 2015) Supreme Court Calendar (PDF) (October Term 2014) Supreme Court Calendar (PDF) (October Term 2013) Argument Calendars Hearing Lists Visitor's Guide to Oral Argument Argument Transcripts Argument Audio Case Documents Docket Search On-Line MERITS BRIEFS Where to Find Briefs Orders of the Court - 2014 Term Orders - Earlier Term Orders by Circuit Granted/Noted Cases List Journal Special Master Reports Rules & Guidance Court Rules Guides for Counsel Guide to Filing Paid Cases (PDF) Paid Cases Brief Chart Guide to Filing In Forma Pauperis Cases (PDF) Guide for Counsel in Cases to be Argued (PDF) Electronic Merits Briefs Submission Guidelines (PDF) Delivery of Documents to the Clerk's Office Supreme Court Bar Bar Admissions Instructions (PDF) Bar Admissions Forms (PDF) Small Group Admissions - Argument Days (PDF) Large Group Admissions - Nonargument Days (PDF) Case Distribution Schedule Waiver Form (PDF) Circuit Assignments of Justices - Circuit Map News Media Press Releases Media Advisories Press Credentials A Reporter's Guide to Applications (PDF) Speeches Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary About the Court Brief Overview Biographies of Current Justices Justices 1789 to Present The Supreme Court Building Constitution No page to display Due to an error, page cannot be display your request. February 21, 2015 | Version 2014.1 Home | Help | Site Map | Contact Us | About Us | FAQ | Jobs | Links | Building Regulations Website Policies and Notices | Privacy Policy | USA.GOV Supreme Court of the United States

assistant: 8
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: See Eales v. Tanana Valley Medical-Surgical Group, Inc., 663 P.2d 958, 959 (Alaska 1983) (ruling that an employee who alleges that he was fired without cause in violation of the terms of his contract has a claim of wrongful discharge). The mayor’s refusal to reinstate Ross as director of public works, despite the decision of the grievance committee, violated Ross’s contract with the City and constituted wrongful discharge as a matter of law. The City concedes that the personnel manual, including the grievance process, was part of Ross’s employment contract. The personnel manual therefore modified Ross’s contract by providing that he would not be fired if he successfully appealed his supervisor’s decision. See Jones v. Central Peninsula Gen. Hosp., 779 P.2d 783, 787 (Alaska 1989) (<HOLDING>). Ross did successfully appeal the mayor’s Options: A. holding that whether a personnel policy manual modifies an employment contract is a question of fact B. holding it is a question of fact C. holding where employee handbook and employment offer letter disclaimed creation of employment contract that employees testimony of his understanding of terms of agreement did not raise fact issue of specific express and clear agreement contradicting the express provisions of the personnel manual and the employment offer letter D. holding the question of whether insurance companys requests were reasonable under policy language was a fact question E. holding that under arkansas law employment is atwill unless personnel manual or employment agreement contains express provision that employee shall not be discharged except for cause

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that whether a personnel policy manual modifies an employment contract is a question of fact
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The headings of the various subsections hereof are for convenience of reference only and shall in no way modify or affect any of the terms or provisions hereof. Where the context herein requires, the singular number shall include the plural, and any gender shall include any other gender.

assistant: Headings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The terms of this Agreement, together with the Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement previously entered into between Executive and the Company (the “ Confidential Information Agreement ”) which shall remain in full force and effect, and the CIC which shall remain in full force and effect, are intended by the Parties to be the final expression of their agreement with respect to the employment of Executive by the Company and supersede all prior understandings and agreements, whether written or oral. The Parties further intend that this Agreement, together with the Confidential Information Agreement and CIC, shall constitute the complete and exclusive statement of their terms and that no extrinsic evidence whatsoever may be introduced in any judicial, administrative, or other legal proceeding to vary the terms of this Agreement.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: who is or has been a debtor under this title, a debtor or bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act, or an individual associated with such debtor or bankrupt, solely because such debtor or bankrupt— (1) is or has been a debtor under this title or a debtor or bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act; (2) has been insolvent before the commencement of the ease under this title or during the case but before the grant or denial of a discharge; or (3)has not paid a debt that is dischargea-ble in a case under this title or that was discharged under the Bankruptcy Act. 11 U.S.C. § 525(b) (1993). Courts typically apply section 525(b) to private employers when the discrimination relates to the debtor’s employment with the entity taking the action. See In re Hicks, 65 B.R. 980, 983-984 (Bankr.W.D.Ark.1986) (<HOLDING>); In re Vaughter, 109 B.R. 229, 237 Options: A. holding that debtors special purpose entity structure did not prevent the upstreaming of cash from the operating entities to other debtors pursuant to a motion for use of cash collateraldip financing motion and that trust structure used did not make one debtor ineligible to file for bankruptcy B. holding pursuant to bankruptcy rule 7004b9 that because the creditor mailed the complaint and summons to the debtors attorney and to the address listed in the debtors bankruptcy petition service of process was sufficient even if the debtors were out of the country and did not actually receive notice of the complaint and summons C. holding that a debtor in bankruptcy may claim as exempt the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy insuring the life of the debtor that is payable to a beneficiary other than the debtor under dccode ann 314716a2001 despite the absence of the term cash surrender from the statute D. holding that although there was evidence the defendant transferred or caused to be transferred more money to the debtor than the debtor transferred to the defendant there was legally sufficient evidence to support the jurys finding of actual fraud under section 24005a1 and b because the badges of fraud showed the debtors intent to hinder delay or defraud creditors E. holding employer bank violated section 525b when it transferred debtor from a position as a teller to a position in the bookkeeping department that did not involve the handling of cash transactions solely because of a notice of debtors bankruptcy in the local newspaper

assistant: The best answer is E. holding employer bank violated section 525b when it transferred debtor from a position as a teller to a position in the bookkeeping department that did not involve the handling of cash transactions solely because of a notice of debtors bankruptcy in the local newspaper
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall file all required Current Reports on Form 8-K relating to the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents, including all required exhibits thereto, with the Commission within the time required by the Exchange Act; provided that the Company shall submit a draft of such Form 8-K(s) to Purchaser and provide Purchaser with reasonable time to review and comment on such Form 8-K(s). The Parties shall consult with each other prior to issuing any press releases with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents, and neither Party shall issue any press release nor otherwise make any public statement with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents without the prior consent of the other Party, which consent shall not unreasonably be withheld or delayed, except if such disclosure is required by Law or NASDAQ, in which case the disclosing Party shall provide the other Party with notice of such press release or public statement as promptly as possible. Notwithstanding anything else contained in this Section 6.5 , except for any press releases or public statements regarding the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents made in connection with and immediately following the Closing, Purchaser shall not be required to consult with the Company regarding any press release or other public statement after the Closing.

assistant: Publicity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the applicable Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control, all restrictions applicable to Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall terminate fully and the Participant shall immediately have the right to the delivery in accordance with Section 7.2(d) of a share certificate or certificates evidencing a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the full number of shares subject to each such Award (in the case of Restricted Stock) or payment in accordance with Section 7.3(a) of a number of shares of Common Stock determined by the Committee, in its discretion, but, in the case of a performance-based or other contingent Award, in no event less than the number of shares payable at the “target” level for each such Award (in the case of Restricted Stock Units). The provisions of this Section 7.4 shall not be applicable to any Restricted Share or Restricted Stock Unit Award granted to a Participant if any Change in Control results from such Participant’s beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of Common Stock or Company Voting Securities.

assistant: Change In Control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: fear of retaliation, and (2) the reliability of her statements to law enforcement officers. As to the first finding, Harris argues that the court initially misunderstood the government’s submission to' indicate that Harris had threatened the witness. Any such concern, however, was alleviated by the prosecutor’s clarification that the victim felt threatened by Harris, not that he had explicitly issued threats. Harris further speculates that the victim’s refusal to appear was animated more by her own criminal conduct than her fear of retaliation by him. But that conjecture is belied b as convincingly demonstrated here is supported by evidence that (1) the victim reported the assault in a 911 call, see Navarette v. California, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1683, 1689-90, 188 L.Ed.2d 680 (2014) (<HOLDING>); (2) Officer Ayala observed the victim’s Options: A. holding that the chief financial officer of a hospital had sufficient access to the allegedly false cost reports resulting from the false invoices to require him to plead at least one example of a false claim with particularity B. holding that where defendant disputed his knowledge and intent to facilitate securities fraud by producing false audit reports evidence of his prior preparation of false audit reports in connection with a similar fraud scheme was properly admitted C. holding corporate officer liable as aider and abettor in filing of false reports even though reports were not authorized or approved of by officers D. recognizing the possibility but denying relief E. recognizing that possibility of tracing and identifying 911 callers provides some safeguards against making false reports with immunity

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing that possibility of tracing and identifying 911 callers provides some safeguards against making false reports with immunity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you will notify the company immediately at privacy@musical.ly if you suspect or know of any unauthorized use of your log-in credentials or any other breach of security with respect to your account .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Seller shall pay all premiums on, and shall not cancel or voluntarily allow to expire, any of Seller’s Insurance Policies unless such policy is replaced, without any lapse of coverage, by another policy or policies providing coverage at least as extensive as the policy or policies being replaced.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: A one-time Interest charge of 10% shall be applied to the Principal Sum. The Interest is in addition to the OID, and that OID remains payable regardless of time and manner of payment by the Issuer. The Issuer may repay a payment of Consideration under this Note (i) at any time on or before 90 days after its Effective Date in an amount equal to 120% of the sum of the Principal Sum being repaid plus all accrued and unpaid interest, OID, liquidated damages, fees and other amounts due on such Principal Sum, or (ii) at any time after 90 days and on or before 180 days after its Effective Date in an amount equal to 130% of the sum of the Principal Sum being repaid plus all accrued and unpaid interest, OID, liquidated damages, fees and other amounts due on such Principal Sum. The Issuer may not repay any payment of Consideration after 180 days after its Effective Date prior to its Maturity Date without written approval from the Investor.

assistant: Interests
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The validity and interpretation of this Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced exclusively in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. Each of the parties hereto and their assigns hereby consents to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the Courts of the State of California, in the County of Los Angeles (or any federal courts having jurisdiction of such area) with respect to any matter relating to this Agreement and performance of the parties’ obligations hereunder, the documents and instruments executed and delivered concurrently herewith or pursuant hereto and performance of the parties’ obligations thereunder and each of the parties hereto hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of such courts and shall subject itself to such personal jurisdiction. Any action, suit or proceeding relating to such matters shall be commenced, pursued, defended and resolved only in such courts and any appropriate appellate court having jurisdiction to hear an appeal from any judgment entered in such courts. The parties irrevocably waive the defense of an inconvenient forum to the maintenance of such suit or proceeding. Service of process in any action, suit or proceeding relating to such matters may be made and served within or outside the State of California by registered or certified mail to the parties and their representatives at their respective addresses specified in Section 8.7, provided that a reasonable time, not less than thirty (30) days, is allowed for response. THE ASSERTION OF ANY REMEDY BY PURCHASER OR ITS ASSIGNS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF ANY OTHER REMEDY AVAILABLE TO IT OR A “SELECTION OF REMEDIES” BY PURCHASER OR HOLDER. Service of process may also be made in such other manner as may be permissible under the applicable court rules. THE PARTIES HERETO WAIVE TRIAL BY JURY.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The agreements in this Section shall survive the resignation of the Administrative Agent and any of the L/C Issuers, the replacement of any Lender, the termination of the Aggregate Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all the other Obligations.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 339 U.S. 258 70 S.Ct. 586 94 L.Ed. 815 MORFORDv.UNITED STATES. No. 236. Distributed Oct. 9, 1949. Decided April 10, 1950. Messrs David Rein, Washington, D.C., Abraham J. Isserman, Los Angeles, Cal., Joseph Forer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Messrs. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., Washington, D.C., Alexander M. Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert S. Erdahl, Washington, D.C., for the United States. PER CURIAM. 1 In this case the trial court did not permit counsel for petitioner to interrogate prospective government employee jurors upon voir dire examination with specific reference to the possible influence of the 'Loyalty Order,' Executive Order No. 9835, 5 U.S.C.A. § 631 note, on their ability to render a just and impartial verdict. Such questioning was permitted in Dennis v. United States, 339 U.S. 162, 70 S.Ct. 519; see n. 4 of the Court's opinion, Id., 339 U.S. 170—171, 70 S.Ct. 522. 2 We said in Dennis that 'Preservation of the opportunity to prove actual bias is a guarantee of a defendant's right to an impartial jury.' Id., 339 U.S. 171—172, 70 S.Ct. 523. Since that opportunity was denied in this case, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. 3 Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER concur in the reversal for the reasons expressed in their opinions in Dennis v. United States, 339 U.S. 162, 70 S.Ct. 519. 4 Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the reversal of the judgment. Since, however, counsel requested that all government employees be excluded from the jury in these cases, he thinks the request should have been granted for the reasons stated by the dissenting Justices in Frazier v. United States, 335 U.S. 497, 69 S.Ct. 201, and in Dennis v. United States, 339 U.S. 162, 70 S.Ct. 519. 5 Mr. Justice CLARK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

assistant: 1
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the LLC Agreement contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. The registration rights granted under this Agreement supersede any registration, qualification or similar rights with respect to any of the Registrable Securities granted under any other agreement, and any of such preexisting registration rights are hereby terminated.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived, or discharged unless such modification, waiver, or discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by the Executive and by a member of the Board, as applicable, or by the respective parties’ legal representatives or successors.

assistant: Modifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that the district judge cannot analyze it and make his final decision in time to avert harm to the plaintiff due to delay, then the plaintiff can move for a preliminary injunction. That would be the kind of case in which a court of appeals might grant a stay of administrative action if that court was the first tier of judicial review of the agency’s action, rather than the district court. 5 U.S.C. § 705; Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921 (D.C.Cir.1958); Busboom Grain Co. v. ICC, 830 F.2d [74,] 75 [(7th Cir.1987) ]. The standard is the same whether a preliminary injunction against agency action is being sought in the district court or a stay of that action is being sought in this court. Id.”); Ohio v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 812 F.2d 288, 290 (6th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>); Kansas ex rel. Graves v. United States, 86 Options: A. holding that the standard for a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the same as the standard for a motion to dismiss B. holding that a motion for a preliminary injunction and a hearing on that motion were insufficient to prevent the plaintiff from dismissing by notice C. holding that the standard of review for the sufficiency of the evidence is the same as the standard for denying a motion for a directed verdict D. holding that a motion for a 705 stay should be judged by the same standard as a motion for a preliminary injunction E. holding that court can consider inadmissible evidence in the context of a motion for preliminary injunction

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a motion for a 705 stay should be judged by the same standard as a motion for a preliminary injunction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: judge announces that she has denied a group of motions, and this group includes the Insureds’ motion to strike as untimely the Reply Evidence. The trial judge further states that she had set the Motion for submission on March 18, 2005, and that counsel knew about this setting. No party challenges this statement, states that the court did not re-set the submission date, expresses surprise that the trial court had set the Motion for submission on that date, or objects to any alleged lack of notice that the submission date had been re-set. The trial court also announces that it is granting the Motion. The Insureds’ counsel complains that the Reply Evidence had been on file for less than ten days before the submission date for the Motio S.W.2d 815, 818 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1996, pet denied) (<HOLDING>). Thus, the timeliness of the Reply Evidence Options: A. holding that trial courts resetting of hearing date for motion for summary judgment made timely summaryjudgment evidence that had been untimely based on hearing date in effect when the evidence was filed and served B. holding that evidence filed less than 21 days before original summaryjudgment hearing was timely even though trial court never granted leave to file late evidence because the summaryjudgment hearing was reset to a date more than 21 days after the evidence was filed C. holding that trial court impliedly ruled on motion for continuance by granting motion for summary judgment when appellant filed motion for continuance two days before summary judgment hearing D. holding that once a trial court has set a date for a summaryjudgment hearing the court must allow the nonmoving party an opportunity to be heard E. holding same when nonsuit filed after summaryjudgment hearing but before rendition of summary judgment

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that trial courts resetting of hearing date for motion for summary judgment made timely summaryjudgment evidence that had been untimely based on hearing date in effect when the evidence was filed and served
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No consent, approval, authorization or order of any court, governmental agency or body or arbitrator having jurisdiction over the Company, or any of its affiliates, is required for the execution by the Company of the transaction documents and compliance and performance by the Company of its obligations under the transaction documents, including, without limitation, the issuance and sale of the Securities, other than such consents, approvals and authorizations as shall have been received by the Company as of the closing date.

assistant: Consents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: was no abuse of discretion in this regard. III. Rebuttal Witness Cluck next urges that the circuit court erred when it allowed the State to call Sergeant Jerry Pittman as a rebuttal witness, because he was not disclosed as a witness by the State prior to trial. Cluck further contends that the court erred by allowing Sergeant Pittman to testify about items found pursuant to a prior unrelated search of Cluck’s home, because his testimony was unduly prejudicial and cumulative. The real question in this case, although not described as such by Cluck, is whether Sergeant Pittman was a proper rebuttal witness. Cluck appears to concede in his brief that the State is not required to disclose a proper rebuttal witness by citing this court to Isbell v. State, 326 Ark. 17, 931 S.W.2d 74 (1996) (<HOLDING>). Cluck, however, contends that the items Options: A. holding venue proper where proper when the action was commenced B. holding that the prosecutor is not required to provide the defense with the names of rebuttal witnesses because until the defense case has been presented the state cannot know of witnesses needed for rebuttal C. holding that the governments late disclosure of a statement by a government witness did not require reversal under the jencks act where the defendants were allowed a second chance to crossexamine the witness D. holding that counsels failure to call an expert rebuttal witness does not constitute ineffectiveness the pcra petitioner must demonstrate that an expert witness was available who would have offered testimony designed to advance his cause E. holding that the disclosure of proper rebuttal witness was not required

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the disclosure of proper rebuttal witness was not required
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if zynga or the zynga affiliate wants to , they are allowed to take exclusive charge of the defense of any case on which you are required to compensate or reimburse them , and it will be at your expense .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: From the Effective Date until March 13, 2018, Executive shall serve as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), with such duties as are customarily associated with the position of a COO for a public company. As part of these duties, Executive shall report to and perform the specific duties and responsibilities assigned to him by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer during this time and, where applicable, the Board of Directors. Beginning on March 13, 2018, Executive shall become and serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), with such duties as are customarily associated with the position of a CEO for a public company. As part of these duties, Executive shall report to and perform the specific duties and responsibilities assigned to him by the Company’s Board of Directors during his tenure as CEO.

assistant: Positions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and all claims, causes of action or proceedings (whether in contract, in tort, at law or otherwise) that may be based upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement will be governed by the internal laws of the State of Delaware, excluding any conflicts or choice-of-law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of this Agreement to the substantive law of another jurisdiction. Jurisdiction and venue of any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement shall be exclusively in the federal and state courts of competent jurisdiction located in Houston, Harris County, Texas, and the parties hereby waive any objection to such venue and jurisdiction including, without limitation, that it is inconvenient.

assistant: Jurisdictions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you violate the letter or spirit of these terms of use , or otherwise create risk or possible legal exposure for instagram , we can stop providing all or part of the service to you .

assistant: Unilateral termination