flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, Licensee may not assign or delegate either this Agreement or any of its rights, interests, or obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of Licensor. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the plain language of the Plan. Benefits payable to children are provided to the “family,” see Webster’s Third New Int’l Dictionary 821 (1986) (defining “family” as “the body of persons who live in one house and under one head including parents[ and] children”); Black’s Law Dictionary 679 (9th ed.2009) (defining “family” as “[a] group consisting of parents and their children”), and the purpose of social security disability benefits is to replace income lost due to the wage earner’s inability to work. Accordingly, the district court correctly allowed Hartford to offset Fortune’s benefits by the amount awarded to her children. b. Public Policy Fortune’s public policy challenge is unpersuasive in light of our decision in Leonelli v. Pennwalt Corp., 887 F.2d 1195, 1198-99 (2d Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). See also Lamb v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., Options: A. recognizing general enforceability of plan provisions reducing benefits by amount of any social security benefits B. holding in postamendment case that offsetting social security retirement benefits against permanent total disability payments rationally related to reducing wagereplacement benefits for retired workers C. holding that use of social security benefits satisfied child support obligation D. holding that an evidentiary hearing is not required prior to the termination of social security disability benefits E. holding that offset for social security retirement benefits does not include federal disability benefits and stating that there was no legislative intent to embody the entire subchapter of the social security act dealing with both disability benefits and old age benefits

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing general enforceability of plan provisions reducing benefits by amount of any social security benefits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As used in this Agreement, the term “ Expenses ” shall include, without limitation, damages, losses, judgments, liabilities, fines, penalties, excise taxes, settlements, costs, attorneys’ fees, accountants’ fees and disbursements and costs of attachment or similar bonds, investigations and any expenses of establishing a right to indemnification under this Agreement.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may not be assigned by the Company (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the Holders, provided, however, that in the event that the Company is a party to a merger, consolidation, share exchange or similar business combination transaction in which the Common Stock is converted into the equity securities of another Person, from and after the effective time of such transaction, such Person shall, by virtue of such transaction, be deemed to have assumed the obligations of the Company hereunder, the term “Company” shall be deemed to refer to such Person and the term “Registrable Shares” shall be deemed to include the securities received by the Holders in connection with such transaction unless such securities are otherwise freely tradable by the Holders after giving effect to such transaction.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Loan Parties and the Restricted Subsidiaries owns, licenses, possesses or otherwise has the right to use all of the trademarks, service marks, trade names, domain names, copyrights, patents, patent rights, licenses, technology, software, know-how, database rights, design rights, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights (collectively, “ IP Rights ”) that are used in the operation of their respective businesses as currently conducted, except to the extent the failure to own, license, possess or otherwise have the right to use such IP Rights, either individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of the Borrower, the Loan Parties’ and the Restricted Subsidiaries’ present business operations do not infringe upon any IP Rights held by any Person, except for such infringements that, individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. As of the Closing Date, no claim or litigation regarding any of the IP Rights, is pending or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, threatened against any Loan Party or any Restricted Subsidiary.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If either party brings any legal action or other proceeding to enforce or interpret any of the rights, obligations or provisions of this Agreement, or because of a dispute, breach or default in connection with any of the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party is entitled to recover from the non-prevailing party reasonable attorneys’ fees and all other costs in such action or proceeding in addition to, but without duplication, any other relief to which the prevailing party may be entitled.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: nothing in this eula grants you a license to reproduce , distribute , publicly perform , communicate to the public , synchronize or otherwise use and exploit any third party content , including , but not limited to , sound recordings or musical works in your user videos or broadcast content .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Loan Party and each Subsidiary thereof is in compliance in all material respects with the requirements of all Laws and all orders, writs, injunctions and decrees applicable to it or to its properties, except in such instances in which (i) such requirement of Law or order, writ, injunction or decree is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted or (ii) the failure to comply therewith, either individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event of any dispute between Kreider and Bion over any provision of the JVA (including the Prior Agreements), Kreider and Bion agree that if they cannot resolve such dispute in 90 days (from written notice), such dispute shall be subject to resolution through binding arbitration (in Pennsylvania), which arbitration shall be by a mutually agreeable arbitrator (if the parties cannot agree on a mutual acceptable arbitrator, each shall nominate an independent third party and such third parties shall chose an arbitrator without consultation with Kreider and Bion which arbitrator shall be deemed to be mutually acceptable). The parties shall split the costs related to such arbitration.

assistant: Arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to that in Katz, none of those cases specifically addresses standing. And in each case, while the officers did not need a warrant to view areas from the air, the information observed, without more, was not enough to justify a warrantless search or seizure of the property. See, e.g., Florida v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445, 449-52, 109 S.Ct. 698, 102 L.Ed.2d 885 (1989) (plurality op.) (reversing the trial court’s grant of a motion to suppress contesting the search of a greenhouse in a residential backyard conducted pursuant to a warrant, which was obtained based upon observations gained from helicopter surveillance, because the helicopter surveillance did not constitute a search under the Fourth Amendment); Dow Chemical v. United States, 476 U.S. 227, 239, 106 S.Ct. 1819, 90 L.Ed.2d 226 (1986) (<HOLDING>); California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207, 215, 106 Options: A. holding only that the taking of aerial photographs of an industrial plant complex from navigable airspace is not a search prohibited by the fourth amendment B. holding that canine sniff not a search under the fourth amendment C. holding that mere insertion of key was not a search or at least not an unreasonable search protected by the fourth amendment D. holding that the fourth amendment and the exclusionary rules are not implicated by a private search E. holding that a canine sniff is a search for purposes of the fourth amendment

assistant: The best answer is A. holding only that the taking of aerial photographs of an industrial plant complex from navigable airspace is not a search prohibited by the fourth amendment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: defendants were properly before the court. He failed to preserve this issue in the district court. Although on appeal he has indicated that he objected to the magistrate judge’s recommendation on this issue, the magistrate judge did not address it. His objection was to the dismissal of BAC on the ground that BAC’s “involvement ... began no earlier than July of 2008 [so was not] substantially rooted in Plaintiffs pre-bankruptcy [past].” R. at 323. Mr. Clem-entson’s failure to raise this argument in the district court precludes our review of it. See Ark Initiative v. U.S. Forest Serv., 660 F.3d 1256, 1261 (10th Cir.2011) (“If the claims are not preserved in the district court, they are forfeited and may not be appealed.”); Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). Nevertheless, BAC, who indisputably acquired Options: A. holding that under the firm waiver rule a party who fails to make a timely objection to the magistrate judges findings and recommendations waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions B. holding that failure to object to magistrate judges recommendation waived issue on appeal C. holding that under the firm waiver rule a partys failure to timely object to the proposed findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions internal quotation marks omitted D. holding failure to timely object to magistrate judges recommendation waives appellate review of factual and legal questions E. holding that under current eleventh circuit rule the failure to object limits the scope of our appellate review to plain error review of the magistrate judges factual findings however failure to object to the magistrate judges legal conclusions does not preclude the party from challenging those conclusions on appeal

assistant: The best answer is D. holding failure to timely object to magistrate judges recommendation waives appellate review of factual and legal questions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THE PARTIES HERETO EACH HEREBY WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY CLAIM, ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM BY EITHER PARTY AGAINST THE OTHER ON ANY MATTERS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS SUB-SUBLEASE, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES HERETO OR SUB-SUBTENANT’S USE OR OCCUPANCY OF THE SUB-SUBLEASED PREMISES.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you are granted a limited , nonexclusive , and nontransferable right to create a text hyperlink to the fitbit service for noncommercial purposes , provided that such link does not portray us or any of our products or services in a false , misleading , derogatory , or otherwise defamatory manner , and provided further that the linking site does not contain any adult or illegal material or any material that is offensive , harassing , or otherwise objectionable .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Employees meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 3 hereof may elect to participate in the Plan commencing on any Entry Date for the applicable Exercise Period by enrolling in the manner and/or through the website designated by the Company during the Enrollment Period.

assistant: Participations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, except that neither the Borrower nor any other Loan Party may assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the Administrative Agent and each Lender and no Lender may assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder except (i) to an assignee in accordance with the provisions of subsection (b) of this Section, (ii) by way of participation in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this Section, or (iii) by way of pledge or assignment of a security interest subject to the restrictions of subsection (f) of this Section (and any other attempted assignment or transfer by any party hereto shall be null and void). Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, shall be construed to confer upon any Person (other than the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, Participants to the extent provided in subsection (d) of this Section and, to the extent expressly contemplated hereby, the Related Parties of each of the Administrative Agent, the L/C Issuer and the Lenders) any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Agreement.

assistant: Successors
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: argument similar to Garduño ’s and added another element requiring notice of the interest at stake. In Schulte v. Transportation Unlimited, Inc., a discharged employee received notice of a hearing requested by his employer to challenge the unemployment benefits he had already received. 354 N.W.2d 830, 831 (Minn. 1984). Because the employee was reemployed before the hearing and was not informed of the potential requirement of repayment upon reversal of the initial decision to award benefits, the employee did not attend the hearing. Id. at 831-32. The Minnesota Court held that the notice was “affirmatively misleading” and resulted in a denial of due process because it failed to communicate the interest at stake. Id. at 835; see also Dilda v. Quern, 612 F.2d 1055, 1057 (7th Cir. 1980) (<HOLDING>)). {33} Garduño’s case is more like cases from Options: A. holding a due process violation for lack of notice of the possible decrease in a food stamp allotment because notice did not meaningfully inform persons so they could protect their interest B. holding that due process rights were not violated when alien claimed a lack of actual notice but his attorney received notice C. holding that lack of notice of charges in disciplinary proceedings violates the due process clause D. holding in a case where it was not clear whether the plaintiff suffered prejudice from the lack of notice that a plaintiff could not obtain reinstatement based on lack of notice E. holding that due process does not require defendant to receive verbal notice of standard probation conditions because all persons have constructive notice of states criminal statutes

assistant: The best answer is A. holding a due process violation for lack of notice of the possible decrease in a food stamp allotment because notice did not meaningfully inform persons so they could protect their interest
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) All proceeds of the Loans will be used by the Borrowers (i) on the Second Restatement Effective Date, to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Transaction and (ii) thereafter, for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes of the Obligors (including making intercompany Investments permitted under this Agreement in (including transfers and payments to Guarantors) Group Members for use by them for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes); provided that (x) in no event may proceeds of the Loan be utilized to refinance any Indebtedness incurred in connection with the direct or indirect acquisition of the Borrowers and Guarantors by the Sponsor or its Affiliates other than in connection with the Transaction, (y) the proceeds of French Borrowing Base Loans shall be used solely to make French Proceeds Loans and (z) no Borrowing or use of proceeds contemplated by this Agreement will violate Anti-Terrorism Laws.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: except as otherwise provided in this agreement , if any provision of this user agreement is held to be invalid , void or for any reason unenforceable , such provision shall be struck out and shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of law under 12(b)(1). Instead, we conclude that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to determine the original state of being, repair, or efficiency of the road as initially constructed. This will enable the trial court to determine whether the dangerous condition of the road that caused Plaintiffs' injuries developed through lack of maintenance subsequent to the road's initial design and construction or whether the injury was attributable solely to the risk inherent in the design of the road. See Walton 968 P.2d at 641 ("When disputed facts exist regarding application of the CGIA's immunity bar, the trial court on its own motion may hold an evidentiary hearing, and should do so upon a public entity's request."); Lafitte v. State Highway Dep't, 885 P.2d 338, 341-42 (Colo.App.1994) (<HOLDING>); Reynolds v. State Bd., 873 P.2d 1, 1 Options: A. holding that a remand and possibly an evidentiary hearing was necessary for reconsideration of the plaintiffs claim for injuries allegedly caused by the states negligent failure to maintain a public highway because court of appeals could not tell whether parties presented and court considered all relevant evidence on the issue B. holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal C. holding that a deposition that was not presented to the trial court could not be considered on appeal D. holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to consider an argument not presented to the board in a motion for reconsideration E. holding that because defendant did not raise a newly discovered evidence claim or amend his postconviction motion after the evidentiary hearing the issue was not timely presented to the trial court and was not cognizable on appeal

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a remand and possibly an evidentiary hearing was necessary for reconsideration of the plaintiffs claim for injuries allegedly caused by the states negligent failure to maintain a public highway because court of appeals could not tell whether parties presented and court considered all relevant evidence on the issue
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (1987) (noting that "where the employer effectively proves that a claimant's disability has been removed altogether, it is not required to prove that suitable work was available to the claimant because it can be presumed that employment is generally available to able-bodied persons.") 7 . Where the Board has not taken additional evidence, our standard of review is limited to determining whether constitutional rights have been violated, an error of law has been committed, or necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Haines v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Clearfield County), 146 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 437, 606 A.2d 571 (1992). 8 . See Rite Aid Corporation v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Bupp), 112 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 548, 552, 535 A.2d 763, 765 (1988) (<HOLDING>); Economy Decorators v. Workmen’s Compensation Options: A. holding that because a suspension admittedly is a concession that disability is continuing claimant need only show that the work provided by the employer on which the suspension is based is no longer available to claimant whereupon total disability payments must be reinstated as of the date of termination of that employment B. holding that the burden of proof is on the claimant C. holding claimant suffered permanent total disability where functional disability was only twentyfive or thirty percent claimant was fiftynine years of age claimant had little or no education and the injury kept the claimant from performing physical work D. recognizing that in suspension situations when a claimants lightduty job ends under circumstances where neither the claimant nor the employer bears any culpability the employer must either find other suitable and available work for the claimant or resume payment of benefits E. holding that claimant moving for summary judgment on its claim must conclusively prove all the essential elements of the claim and that claimant has the burden to show that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that claimant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that because a suspension admittedly is a concession that disability is continuing claimant need only show that the work provided by the employer on which the suspension is based is no longer available to claimant whereupon total disability payments must be reinstated as of the date of termination of that employment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Buyer shall pay Seller fees for the Services as set forth on the attached Schedule A . After the end of each month during the Term, Seller shall deliver an invoice to Buyer or its affiliate for the Services provided in such month, together with such billing data, supporting documentation and level of detail as may reasonably be requested by Buyer. Buyer shall pay the invoice within 30 days of Buyer’s receipt of the invoice and all billing data, supporting documentation and level of detail that was reasonably requested by Buyer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) Buyer may choose to pay all or any portion of an invoice by agreeing to reduce one or more payments to be made by Seller to Buyer pursuant to Section 1(g) , and (ii) prior to Buyer making any payment due to Seller, Buyer may offset against such payment any amounts owed by Seller to any Buyer Party pursuant to this Agreement or the Purchase Agreement.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: must be reversed and the case dismissed. JUDGMENT OF THE DISTRICT COURT REVERSED; CASE DISMISSED. All justices concur except APPEL and MANSFIELD, JJ., who take no part. 1 . We recognize the United States Supreme Court has indicated it is an open question "whether the New York Times standard can apply to an individual defendant rather than to a media defendant.” Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. 111, 133 n. 16, 99 S.Ct. 2675, 2687 n. 16, 61 L.Ed.2d 411, 430 n. 16 (1979); accord Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 20 n. 6, 110 S.Ct. 2695, 2706 n. 6, 111 L. Ed. 2d 1, 18 n. 6 (1990); Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 779 n. 4, 106 S.Ct. 1558, 1565 n. 4, 89 L.Ed.2d 783, 794 n. 4 (1986); see also Obsidian Fin. Grp., LLC v. Cox, 740 F.3d 1284, 1290 (9th Cir.2014) (<HOLDING>). Yet, in a case in which the Court rejected a Options: A. holding that first amendment protections apply to compelled speech as well as restrictions on speech B. holding that various fifth and sixth amendment protections apply to juvenile proceedings C. recognizing first amendment retaliation right D. recognizing the supreme court has never resolved whether first amendment protections apply beyond the institutionalized press E. holding that a claim under the first amendment overbreadth doctrine will not succeed unless the challenged statute itself will significantly compromise recognized first amendment protections of parties not before the court

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing the supreme court has never resolved whether first amendment protections apply beyond the institutionalized press
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the employment relationship created by it shall be governed by North Carolina law without giving effect to North Carolina choice of law provisions. The parties hereby consent to exclusive jurisdiction in North Carolina for the purpose of any litigation relating to this Agreement and agree that any litigation by or involving them relating to this Agreement shall be conducted in the courts of Wake County, North Carolina or the federal courts of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 390 U.S. 340 88 S.Ct. 1098 19 L.Ed.2d 1220 Roy Michael FELTON et al.v.CITY OF PENSACOLA. No. 934. Supreme Court of the United States March 11, 1968 Stanley Fleishman, Sam Rosenwein and Hugh W. Gibert, for petitioners. Dave Caton, for respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. PER CURIAM. 1 The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, is reversed. Redrup v. State of New York, 386 U.S. 767, 87 S.Ct. 1414, 18 L.Ed.2d 515. 2 THE CHIEF JUSTICE would grant the petition and reverse because of the failure of the trial court to adhere to the standard for judging obscenity announced in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498. 3 Mr. Justice HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 and his dissenting opinion in A Book Named 'John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, 86 S.Ct. 975, 16 L.Ed.2d 1.

assistant: 3
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, and all claims or causes of action (whether in contract or tort) that may be based upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement or the negotiation, execution or performance of this Agreement (including any claim or cause of action based upon, arising out of or related to any representation or warranty made in or in connection with this Agreement), will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of laws that would require the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. Any action against any party relating to the foregoing shall be brought in any federal or state court of competent jurisdiction located within the State of New York, and the parties hereto hereby irrevocably submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of any federal or state court located within the State of New York over any such action. The parties hereby irrevocably waive, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law, any objection that they may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any such dispute brought in such court or any defense of inconvenient forum for the maintenance of such dispute. Each of the parties hereto agrees that a judgment in any such dispute may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by Law.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: does not compel the conclusion that Talamantes Valverde is unable or unwilling to return to Mexico “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A); Jukic v. INS, 40 F.3d 747, 749 (5th Cir.1994); see Wang, 569 F.3d at 537. Although Talamantes Valverde asserts that his membership in a family constitutes “a particular social group” for purposes of asylum, the IJ and the BIA implicitly found that the alleged persecution was based on economic disputes over land ownership and therefore was not on account of Talamantes Valverde’s membership in “a particular social group.” See Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft, 303 F.3d 341, 348, 352-53 (5th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Cf. Castillo-Enriquez v. Holder, 690 F.3d Options: A. holding that an alien cannot claim asylum based on persecution that is personally motivated B. holding that alien did not show land ownership dispute was motivated by any protected ground C. holding that deportable alien status is not a ground for departing downward D. holding that a police officers words during an assault make clear that he was motivated by a protected ground E. holding that imputed political opinion is a protected ground

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that alien did not show land ownership dispute was motivated by any protected ground
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties respecting the subject matter hereof and there are no verbal or collateral understandings, agreements, representations other than as expressly set forth herein and therein.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of the case to chapter 7. Having found that the funds held by the Trustee are property of the Debtor, the motion to compel will be granted. An appropriate order will be entered. 1 . The filing of this case pre-dated the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 37 ("BAPCPA”), which became effective on October 17, 2005. 2 . I have jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This matter is core pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O). This Opinion constitutes findings of fact and conclusions of law required to be made by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure ("FRBP”) 7052, which is applicable to contested matters pursuant to FRBP 9014. 3 . See, e.g., Resendez v. Lindquist, 691 F.2d 397, 399 (8th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>); Matter of Lybrook, 951 F.2d 136 (7th Options: A. holding that the conversion of a chapter 7 petition to a chapter 13 petition was not final until the plan itself was approved B. holding that funds held by chapter 13 trustee become property of the chapter 7 estate upon conversion not subject to exemption C. holding tort action accruing after original chapter 7 petition not part of estate when case converted to chapter 13 and then back to chapter 7 D. holding that the 1994 amendment to 348 of the bankruptcy code should control in preamendment ongoing cases and that the debtors tort causes of action that accrued while the case was proceeding under chapter 13 did not become property of the estate or subject to the bankruptcy proceedings upon conversion of the case to chapter 7 proceedings E. holding that since property of the chapter 7 estate relates back to what was property of the bankruptcy estate when the chapter 13 was commenced and since the debtor still has the vehicle in his possession the present equity in the vehicle does not belong to the chapter 7 trustee or to unsecured creditors of this estate

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that funds held by chapter 13 trustee become property of the chapter 7 estate upon conversion not subject to exemption
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and the Issuing Lender agrees to maintain the confidentiality of the Information, except that Information may be disclosed (i) to its Affiliates and to its and its Affiliates' respective partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, advisors and other representatives (it being understood that the Persons to whom such disclosure is made will be informed of the confidential nature of such Information and instructed to keep such Information confidential), (ii) to the extent requested by any regulatory authority purporting to have jurisdiction over it (including any self-regulatory authority, such as the National Association of Insurance Commissioners), (iii) to the extent required by applicable Laws or regulations or by any subpoena or similar legal process, (iv) to any other party hereto, (v) in connection with the exercise of any remedies hereunder or under any other Loan Document or any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document or the enforcement of rights hereunder or thereunder, (vi) subject to an agreement containing provisions substantially the same as those of this Section, to (A) any assignee of or Participant in, or any prospective assignee of or Participant in, any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement or (B) any actual or prospective counterparty (or its advisors) to any swap or derivative transaction relating to the Borrower and its obligations, (vii) with the consent of the Borrower or (viii) to the extent such Information (Y) becomes publicly available other than as a result of a breach of this Section or (Z) becomes available to the Administrative Agent, any Lender, the Issuing Lender or any of their respective Affiliates on a nonconfidential basis from a source other than the Borrower. Any Person required to maintain the confidentiality of Information as provided in this Section shall be considered to have complied with its obligation to do so if such Person has exercised the same degree of care to maintain the confidentiality of such Information as such Person would accord to its own confidential information.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower and the Subsidiaries have timely filed or caused to be filed all Tax returns and reports required to have been filed and have paid or caused to be paid all Taxes required to have been paid by them, except (a) any Taxes that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which the Borrower or such Subsidiary has set aside on its books adequate reserves or (b) to the extent that the failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of competing testimony and witness credibility. See Johnson v. Perez, 823 F.3d 701, 709-10, 2016 WL 2941965, at *7 (D.C.Cir.2016) (explaining that “[t]o the extent the testimony of a witness who is also a party may be impaired by [a] party[’s] self-interest, it is ordinarily the role of the jury—not the court on summary judgment—to discount it accordingly”); see also Desmond v. Mukasey, 530 F.3d 944, 965 (D.C.Cir.2008). Yet, in other circumstances, a witness may lack personal knowledge concerning the matter about which he attempts to offer testimony, or may make a statement that is so concluso-ry—and presented without any supporting facts in the record—that it leaves the jury “in no position to assess” the veracity of his statement. Greene v. Dalton, 164 F.3d 671, 675 (D.C.Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). Compare Ass’n of Flight Attmdants-CWA, Options: A. holding that summary judgment was appropriate where plaintiffs admissions in her deposition undermined her claims B. holding that to defeat summary judgment plaintiff was obliged to offer evidence indicating that persons who actually participated in her termination decision had knowledge of her protected characteristics C. holding that the plaintiffs evidence of pretext which included but was not limited to her supervisors statement that she had enough of the plaintiff going to her supervisor about her was not sufficient to preclude summary judgment D. holding that the plaintiffs conclusory statement that the student who was hired instead of her had less experience and education could not defeat summary judgment because absent supporting facts a jury would be in no position to assess her claim of superiority E. holding that threatening employee to mind her own business investigating her videotaping her without her permission and forcing her to take polygraph could not be considered adverse employment actions because they had no effect on conditions of employment

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the plaintiffs conclusory statement that the student who was hired instead of her had less experience and education could not defeat summary judgment because absent supporting facts a jury would be in no position to assess her claim of superiority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: containing the arbitration clause].” Id. The HMOs nonetheless direct our attention to more general language from MS Dealer, which notes that equitable estoppel may be appropriate “when the signatory [to the contract containing the arbitration clause] raises allegations of ... substantially interdependent and concerted misconduct by both the nonsignatory and one or more of the signatories to the contract.” Id. (quoting Boyd at 1433). The HMOs contend that this language mandates an application of equitable estoppel in this case simply because the doctors allege a RICO conspiracy. This contention is only tenable if the passage is read completely out of context. MS Dealer “is not a rigid test, and each case turns on its facts.” Hill v. G E Power Systems, Inc., 282 F.3d 343 (5th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). In all cases, “‘the lynchpin for equitable Options: A. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to extend time for service of process under rule 4m B. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to apply doctrine of equitable estoppel even though complaint alleged collusive scheme to defraud C. holding district court did not abuse its discretion in not granting plaintiffs leave to amend complaint for a third time D. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to apply laches where the only prejudice shown by the government was attributable to its own delay rather than to that of the movant E. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a complaint with prejudice based on the plaintiffs failure to amend the complaint by the deadline imposed by the court

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to apply doctrine of equitable estoppel even though complaint alleged collusive scheme to defraud
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: courts to examine the offense that is the object of the conspiracy to determine whether the conspiracy is a felony or misdemeanor. As such, we agree with the district court’s conclusion that [t]he fact that the jury found Ms. Island guilty of embezzlement of a sum less than $1,000 has no real bearing on whether the jury found guilt on the felony conspiracy charged in the indictment. It is a separate crime. It is a charge of conspiring to violate the laws of the United States, not to embezzle money from the Cheyenne & Arapaho tribe. The overt acts alleged in support of the conspiracy allege that a sum in excess of $15,000 was the object of the conspiracy. That is clearly a felony. R. Vol. 1, Sentencing Hr’g at 5. See generally United States v. Gallup, 812 F.2d 1271, 1277 (10th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). The judgment of the district court is Options: A. holding that the notion of enterprise conspiracy has largely rendered the old distinction between single conspiracy and multiple conspiracy irrelevant to rico conspiracy charges B. holding that once a defendant becomes associated with a conspiracy he is responsible for all of the acts of the conspiracy even those which occurred before or after his association with the conspiracy C. holding it is the mere agreement to violate rico that 1962d forbids it is not necessary to prove any substantive rico violations ever occurred as a result of the conspiracy without mentioning neibels limitations on who may be held liable for rico conspiracy which posit that conspiracy liability is dependent on potential substantive liability if the scheme were successfully completed D. holding the crime of conspiracy is committed or not before the substantive crime begins E. holding that because it is axiomatic that the defendants could have been prosecuted for conspiracy without ever having committed a substantive crime they could be charged with felony conspiracy and misdemeanors

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that because it is axiomatic that the defendants could have been prosecuted for conspiracy without ever having committed a substantive crime they could be charged with felony conspiracy and misdemeanors