flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: 15.4 airbnb may immediately , without notice terminate this agreement if ( i ) you have materially breached your obligations under these terms , the payments terms , our policies or standards , ( ii ) you have violated applicable laws , regulations or third party rights , or ( iii ) airbnb believes in good faith that such action is reasonably necessary to protect the personal safety or property of airbnb , its members , or third parties ( for example in the case of fraudulent behavior of a member ) .

assistant: Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Disputes arising under or in connection with this Agreement, including requests for specific performance, shall be resolved through binding arbitration conducted as provided in this Section 5.1(b) pursuant to the rules of the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce ("ICC"). The arbitration shall be conducted in the English language and shall occur in Los Angeles County, California, USA only following the failure to resolve the dispute pursuant to cooperative engagement discussions as set forth in Section 5.1(a) above. There shall be three arbitrators: each party shall choose one arbitrator and, if the two arbitrators are not able to agree on a third arbitrator, the third shall be chosen by the ICC. The prevailing party in the arbitration shall have the right to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, which the arbitrators shall include in their awards. Any party that seeks to confirm or vacate an arbitration award issued under this Section 5.1(b) may do so only pursuant to the applicable arbitration statutes. In any litigation involving ICANN concerning this Agreement, jurisdiction and exclusive venue for such litigation shall be in a court located in Los Angeles County, California, USA; however, the parties shall also have the right to enforce a judgment of such a court in any court of competent jurisdiction. For the purpose of aiding the arbitration and/or preserving the rights of the parties during the pendency of an arbitration, the parties shall have the right to seek a temporary stay or injunctive relief from the arbitration panel or a court, which shall not be a waiver of this agreement to arbitrate.

assistant: Arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (1) Annual Election . Prior to January 1 of each Plan Year, an Employee may elect: (A) to make Before-tax Deposits from his or her Base Compensation that will be earned and paid in such Plan Year, (B) to make Before-tax Deposits from his or her Bonus Compensation that will be earned (or begin to be earned) in such Plan Year, (C) to defer all or a portion of his or her Equity Awards that will be granted in such Plan Year (for this purpose, an Equity Award shall be considered granted when the Company takes action to approve such grant), and (D) the form and time of distribution of the Account with respect to such Plan Year, as permitted by Section 7.1(b). Such election shall be made as of the times the Committee may prescribe and shall be irrevocable as of December 31 of the year immediately preceding the Plan Year for which such elections are effective.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As a condition to receiving the Stay Bonus, the Recipient shall be required to actively and satisfactorily cooperate and consult with and provide all reasonable assistance to the Company Group and any of their officers, employees or representatives through each applicable payment date, as reasonably determined by the Company, including actively and satisfactorily cooperating and participating in any sale process undertaken by the Company Group. Further, as a condition to receiving the Stay Bonus, Recipient must be in continued compliance with the terms of this Agreement, including, without limitation, Section 5 and Section 6 hereof.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and verbal, among the parties or any of them with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Amendment shall not constitute a novation of any amount owing under the Existing Credit Agreement and all amounts owing in respect of principal, interest, fees and other amounts pursuant to the Existing Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall, to the extent not paid or exchanged on or prior to the Amendment Effective Date, continue to be owing under the Credit Agreement or such other Loan Documents until paid in accordance therewith.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 77 F.Supp.3d at 1187-88, 2014 WL 7473806, at *27. These cases all stand for the same thing: at the pleading stage, the existence of a Monell policy is a “conclusion” to be built up to, rather than a “fact” to be baldly asserted. When there is no formal written policy and the § 1983 plaintiff is relying upon a practice or custom, some courts appear to look for a specific number of prior similar incidents — often saying that two or three instances will not suffice. See Wilson v. Cook Cnty., 742 F.3d 775, 780 (7th Cir.2014)(“Although this court has not adopted any bright-line rules for establishing what constitutes a widespread custom or practice, it is clear that a single incident — or even three incidents — do not suffice.”); Andrews v. Fowler, 98 F.3d 1069, 1076 (8th Cir.1996)(<HOLDING>); Eugene v. Alief Ind. Sch. Dist., 65 F.3d Options: A. holding that a section 1983 plaintiff asserting police misconduct must allege a pattern of similar incidents in which citizens were injured or endangered by policyconsistent misconduct or that serious incompetence or misbehavior was general or widespread throughout the police force B. holding that a finding of misconduct under section 44303626 requires intentional repeated instances of misconduct or violations of explicit policies after the employee has received warnings C. holding that a refusal to make false statements that no misconduct occurred is a very different circumstance than an affirmative statement of misconduct D. recognizing that the court sanctions more harshly for cumulative misconduct than for isolated misconduct E. holding that two instances of misconduct do not indicate a persistent and widespread pattern of misconduct that amounts to a city custom or policy of overlooking police misconduct

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that two instances of misconduct do not indicate a persistent and widespread pattern of misconduct that amounts to a city custom or policy of overlooking police misconduct
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The execution, delivery and performance of the Transaction Documents by the Company and the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby (including, without limitation, the issuance of the Note, and the reservation for issuance and issuance of the Conversion Shares issuable upon conversion of the Note) will not (i) result in a violation of the Charter (as defined below) (including, without limitation, any certificate of designation contained therein) or other organizational documents of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, any capital stock of the Company, or Bylaws (as defined below) or the bylaws of any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) conflict with, or constitute a default (or an event which with notice or lapse of time or both would become a default) under, or give to others any rights of termination, amendment, acceleration or cancellation of, any agreement, indenture or instrument to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or (iii) result in a violation of any law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or decree (including, without limitation, foreign, federal and state securities laws and regulations and the rules and regulations of The NASDAQ Global Select Market (the “ Principal Market ”)) applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or by which any property or asset of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is bound or affected, other than, in the case of clause (ii) above, for such conflicts, defaults or rights that could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, at the maturity date of the Note or at any other times when payments are required to be made in cash pursuant to the terms of the Note, there shall be no covenant, agreement, arrangement, prohibition, limitation or restriction in effect that would prohibit, limit, restrict, delay, conflict with or impair the ability or right of the Company to repay in cash all outstanding principal and other amounts outstanding under the Note.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 106 S.Ct. 2279, 90 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986). The mere fact that a trial judge may decide a matter within his discretionary authority in a different manner than an appellate judge in a similar circumstance does not demonstrate that an abuse of discretion has occurred. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Johnson, 389 S.W.2d 645, 648 (Tex.1965). Definition of Good Faith The Tax Code does not contain a definition of “good faith” and no published case has construed this phrase in the context of Section 26.04(g). In Texas, “good faith” has sometimes been defined as a purely subjective standard. See e.g., Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 1.201(19)(Vernon Supp.2001)(defining good faith as honesty in fact); La Sara Grain Company v. First Nat'l Bank of Mercedes, Texas, 673 S.W.2d 558, 563 (Tex.1984)(<HOLDING>). On the other hand, an objective standard has Options: A. holding that a party must at least have a subjective belief that litigation was a real possibility and that belief must have been objectively reasonable B. holding that the test for good faith is the actual belief of the party and not the reasonableness of that belief C. holding that a plaintiff must show that a defendant did not have an honest good faith belief in marking its products D. holding that an employee seeking the protection of the opposition clause must demonstrate a good faith reasonable belief that the challenged practice violates title vii E. holding that such a belief is a knowing misrepresentation

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the test for good faith is the actual belief of the party and not the reasonableness of that belief
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither Party may assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party, except that (a) either Party may assign this Agreement without the consent of the other Party in connection with the acquisition of such Party or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of such Party (whether by sale or merger or otherwise), and (b) Purchaser may assign (i) this Agreement without consent in connection with a transfer of Registrable Securities not prohibited hereunder to an Affiliate at any time, and (ii) after the Lock-Up Period, its rights under Section 6 without consent in connection with a transfer of Registrable Securities not prohibited hereunder, to any Person (other than in a public offering or a sale pursuant to Rule 144); provided that the transferee, prior to or simultaneously with such transfer, shall have agreed in writing to be subject to and bound by all of the restrictions and obligations set forth in this Agreement as though it were Purchaser hereunder. Any assignment of this Agreement in violation of this Section 7.7 shall be null and void. Assignment of this Agreement by either Party shall not relieve the assignor of its obligations hereunder. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to talk to the police. State: Why not talk to the police if what you are saying is true. Defendant: Because I could always talk to them. State: You could? When? Defendant: Whenever I got my lawyer. State: And did you do that? Defendant: I got my lawyer. State: Did you talk to the police? Defendant: They never came and talked to me. State: Oh, did you[r] attorney ever invite them to come talk to you and say, hey, we got a meeting? Defendant: I mean, I figured it was probably too much — too late then. State: Oh. So you didn’t really want to talk to the police? Defendant: I mean, I never — it came up. That never — it was never in the conversation. This line of questioning clearly constituted comments on the appellant’s right to remain silent. See State v. Hoggins, 718 So.2d 761 (Fla.1998) (<HOLDING>). Thus, it appears counsel may have been Options: A. holding a prosecutor may not comment on a defendants silence B. holding that an infringement on the defendants fundamental due process right in the form of a comment on the defendants silence by the prosecution did not rise to level of plain error C. holding that the government may comment on a defendants prearrest premiranda silence as well as his postarrest pr emiranda silence D. holding that it is improper for prosecutor to comment on accuseds postarrest silence E. holding that if comment is fairly susceptible of being construed by the jury as a comment on the defendants exercise of his or her right to remain silent it violates the defendants state constitutional right to silence whether comment was introduced in states caseinchief or for impeachment purposes holding that the state may not impeach a defendant with his postarrest or postmiranda silence

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that if comment is fairly susceptible of being construed by the jury as a comment on the defendants exercise of his or her right to remain silent it violates the defendants state constitutional right to silence whether comment was introduced in states caseinchief or for impeachment purposes holding that the state may not impeach a defendant with his postarrest or postmiranda silence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: she felt “degraded.” The record reflects Juvenile directed his statements at B.B. personally and that the situation was potentially volatile. B.B. testified: What made me mad was the other students all looking at me to see what I J.L.W., 572 N.W.2d 752, 757-58 (Minn.Ct.App.1997) (“The fact that the target of alleged fighting words does not retaliate is relevant to the question of whether conduct meets the First Amendment standard, but is not determinative.”) (citation omitted). ¶28 One might assume educators who work with adolescents have a longer fuse in the face of abuse, and we alluded to such an assumption in Louise C. 197 Ariz. at 86, ¶ 8, 3 P.3d at 1006. See also Lewis v. City of New Orleans, 415 U.S. 130, 132, 135, 94 S.Ct. 970, 39 L.Ed.2d 214 (1974) (Powell, J., concurring) (<HOLDING>). Although courts should consider the Options: A. holding that a state may not exercise a prior restraint on publishing a newspaper B. holding trained officers may be expected to exercise a higher degree of restraint and that a middleaged woman shouting you god damn mf police did not constitute fighting words C. recognizing that courts should exercise judicial restraint in a facial challenge D. holding that a police officers words during an assault make clear that he was motivated by a protected ground E. holding that if you do not qualify under the hup test you never get to the statute

assistant: The best answer is B. holding trained officers may be expected to exercise a higher degree of restraint and that a middleaged woman shouting you god damn mf police did not constitute fighting words
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as to brokers associated with the Sale Agreement, for which Seller under the Sale Agreement is solely responsible, Landlord and Tenant each represent and warrant to the other party that such party has not dealt with any real estate broker in connection with this Lease and Landlord and Tenant agree to indemnify the other party and save the other party harmless from any and all claims for brokerage commissions by any other person, firm, corporation or other entity claiming through such party to have brought about this Lease transaction. The provisions of this Section 21.10 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease.

assistant: Brokers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: at common law against a charge of non-sexual assault, nor did this court find any such case. Taken to its logical conclusion, appellant’s argument that consent should be a defense to assault where there is significant bodily injury would render non-prosecutable acts that are an affront to the public peace and order, such as a loan shark lending money on the condition that non-payment authorizes a beating or gang members who agree to settle old scores by a shootout. The absurd realities of recognizing consent as a defense to assault with significant bodily injúry are not farfetched. For example, in Brown, 364 A.2d at 28, the defendant was charged with assault after “severely beating [the victim] with his hands and other objects” after the victim had “indulged in some spiri 8) (en banc) (<HOLDING>) (internal quotation marks omitted and Options: A. holding that consent to participate in the initiation into a prison gang is not a defense to the charge of battery B. holding that active participation in a criminal street gang means that there is a relationship between the defendant and the gang that is more than nominal passive inactive or purely technical and that defendant must devote all or a substantial part of his time and efforts to the gang C. recognizing that a conviction under 292133 requires that the arrest be lawful D. holding that murder committed by minor gang members was not foreseeable result of sale of alcohol to gang members E. holding that victims consent to ritualistic beating as a part of the gang initiation is not relevant because the acts amounted to a reckless infliction of bodily injury and thus did not constitute a lawful act committed by lawful means and affirmed the conviction of manslaughter

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that victims consent to ritualistic beating as a part of the gang initiation is not relevant because the acts amounted to a reckless infliction of bodily injury and thus did not constitute a lawful act committed by lawful means and affirmed the conviction of manslaughter
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same respective agreement. Signatures sent by facsimile or electronic mail shall be deemed originals for all purposes and shall bind the parties hereto.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall not be assignable or otherwise transferable by either party hereto, but any amounts owing to Executive upon the Executive’s death shall inure to the benefit of the Executive’s heirs, legatees, legal representatives, executor or administrator. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement applies with the prior written consent of the Executive, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and any such respective heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, representatives, successors and assigns.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to spousal maintenance. The trial court’s decree of dissolution includes an admirably thorough, careful, three-page list and division of the marital assets. Under these circumstances, we cannot conclude that it abused its discretion in awarding Karen 54% of the marital estate. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions to amend the decree of dissolution to reflect that Karen is entitled to receive spousal maintenance for an indefinite period of time. BAILEY, J., concurs. VAIDIK, J., concurs in result. 1 . Charles, of course, is free at any time to seek a modification of the spousal maintenance award if he believes that Karen is no longer incapacitated. See In re Marriage of Erwin, 840 N.E.2d 385, 389 (Ind.Ct.App. 2006) (<HOLDING>). 2 . We also note, as did the trial court, Options: A. holding that there is no spousal exception to the statute B. holding that a trial court has broad discretion to modify a spousal maintenance award C. holding that the trial court lacked authority to renew spousal support payments pursuant to a motion that was filed after the expiration of time during which spousal support was required to be paid under the original judgment D. holding that the trial court was without authority to modify a spousal support obligation when the modification proceeding was initiated ten years after the obligation to pay spousal support under the dissolution judgment had been terminated by order E. holding that a rule 11 sanctions award need only be appropriate thereby according broad discretion to the trial court

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a trial court has broad discretion to modify a spousal maintenance award
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: yet by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, “ ‘the underlying principle is that when a promise of immunity induces a defendant to ... cooperate with the government to his [or her] detriment, due process requires that the prosecutor’s promise be fulfilled.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Fuzer, 18 F.3d 517, 521 (7th Cir.1994)). With these standards in mind, the court turns to consideration of the merits of defendant Kozak’s motion to dismiss. B. The Existence Of A Cooperation Agreement In This Case Applying basic contract principles to the alleged cooperation agreement in this case, in order to dismiss the indictment, the court must find that an agreement existed between the government and Kozak, that Kozak has substantially performed her part of the agreement, and that Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>); cf. United States v. Barnes, 83 F.3d 934, 938 Options: A. holding that there can be no plea agreement without a meeting of the minds B. holding that where the plea agreement required the government to inform the sentencing court of all defendants cooperation the issue is not whether the prosecutor enthusiastically disclosed his cooperation but whether the prosecutor disclosed all cooperation C. holding that plaintiff may be entitled to prevailing party status where the mediation agreement entered into by the parties was read into the record before a hearing officer D. holding that cooperation agreement defendant entered into with the government did not include defendants testifying at trial where there was no meeting of the minds as to that point E. holding that defendant was not entitled to specific performance of alleged cooperation agreement entered into with fbi agent who allegedly promised defendant he would not be prosecuted if he cooperated in making a statement where there was no evidence establishing that agent was authorized to make promises to obtain defendants cooperation

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that cooperation agreement defendant entered into with the government did not include defendants testifying at trial where there was no meeting of the minds as to that point
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and disbursements arising out of any arbitration, and IOENGINE and McNulty on the one hand, and GlassBridge on the other hand, shall pay an equal share of the fees and costs of the arbitrators. Absent the filing of an application to correct or vacate the arbitration award as permitted by applicable law, each Party shall fully perform and satisfy the arbitration award within fifteen (15) days of the service of the award.

assistant: Costs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, and so long as (i) the 2016 Audited Financial Statements are delivered to the Lender on a timely basis as required pursuant to Section 7.1(c) of the Credit Agreement, (ii) the Proposed Audit Opinion, in substantially the form as attached as Annex A , is delivered along with the 2016 Audited Financial Statements (without any material change or modification thereto) and (iii) at the time of delivery of such 2016 Audited Financial Statements and Proposed Audit Opinion, no other Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing or, with passage of time, the giving of notice or both, would occur, the Lender will be deemed to have waived, for all purposes of Sections 9.1.4 and 11.1 of the Credit Agreement, the Impermissible Qualification Default, all without need of further action or notice of any kind.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the other Loan Documents and any claim, controversy, dispute or cause of action (whether in contract or tort or otherwise) based upon, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document (except, as to any other Loan Document, as expressly set forth therein) and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York; provided , however , that (i) the determination of the accuracy of any Acquisition Agreement Representation and whether as a result of any inaccuracy thereof either of the Borrowers (or its applicable Affiliate) have the right to terminate its obligations pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement or otherwise decline to consummate the Acquisition pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement as a result of a breach of such representations and warranties in the Acquisition Agreement, (ii) the interpretation of whether a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Acquisition Agreement) has occurred, and (iii) the determination of whether the Acquisition has been consummated in accordance with the terms of the Acquisition Agreement shall, in each case, be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of laws thereof.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: selling narcotics, she had made no inculpatory remarks, there were no “fresh needle marks” on her body, and there was no “juxtaposition between her (in the front bedroom) and contraband being jettisoned by her husband in the bathroom.” Id. at 130-31, 321 A.2d at 771. Judge O’Donnell then surveyed numerous cases of the Court of Special Appeals, some of them factually similar to the instant case, in which convictions for possession of contraband were reversed for insufficient evidence. The recurrent theme of these cases is that convictions for possession cannot stand when the evidence does not establish, nor provides any reasonable inference to establish, that the accused exercised dominion or control over the contraband. See Tucker v. State, 19 Md.App. 39, 45, 308 A.2d 696, 699 (1973) (<HOLDING>); Barksdale v. State, 15 Md.App. 469, 475, 291 Options: A. holding evidence insufficient to establish defendant had physical or constructive possession of heroin when no drugs were found on his person and the only drugs discovered on the premises which he shared with the codefendant were secreted out of plain view B. holding when drugs are found on premises exclusive control provides significant proof of constructive possession C. holding evidence insufficient for conviction for possession of controlled dangerous substances when the drugs were not found on the person of or in the same room as the defendant but were only found on other persons on the premises D. holding evidence insufficient to establish defendant had physical or constructive pos session when the drugs that were discovered in a hotel room that he shared with a codefendant were secreted and out of plain view E. holding evidence insufficient for conviction of possession of marijuana amphetamines and barbiturates when those drugs were not found on the person of or in the same room as the defendant but were only found on other people on the premises

assistant: The best answer is A. holding evidence insufficient to establish defendant had physical or constructive possession of heroin when no drugs were found on his person and the only drugs discovered on the premises which he shared with the codefendant were secreted out of plain view
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any rent remains delinquent for a period in excess of ten (10) days then, in addition to such late charge, Tenant shall pay to Landlord interest on any rent that is not paid when due at the Agreed Interest Rate following the date such amount became due until paid.

assistant: Interests
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Option granted hereunder shall expire in all events at 5:00 p.m. (local Philadelphia, Pennsylvania time) on [DATE], unless sooner terminated as provided in Subparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) or (f) below.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No failure on the part of the Collateral Agent or any Guaranteed Creditor to exercise and no delay in exercising, and no course of dealing with respect to, any right, power, privilege or remedy or any abandonment or discontinuance of steps to enforce such right, power, privilege or remedy under this Agreement or any other Loan Document shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, power, privilege or remedy under this Agreement or any other Loan Document preclude or be construed as a waiver of any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power, privilege or remedy. The remedies provided herein are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law or equity.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Provided that Tenant and Tenant’s agents do not interfere with Landlord’s construction of the Project, including the Tenant Improvements, Landlord shall allow Tenant and Tenant’s employees, consultants and vendors access to the Premises, Critical Common Areas, and Parking Garage prior to the anticipated Substantial Completion Date, and continuing throughout the construction of the Tenant Improvements, during the normal construction hours for the purpose of Tenant coordinating with Landlord relating to the construction of the Tenant Improvements, Tenant’s move to the Premises, and Tenant’s installation of furniture, fixtures, equipment and other personal property in the Premises. Prior to Tenant’s entry into the Premises, Critical Common Areas, and Parking Garage as permitted by the terms of this Section 1.9 , Tenant shall submit a schedule to Landlord, for its approval, which schedule shall detail the timing and purpose of Tenant’s entry. Tenant shall not unreasonably interfere with or delay the work of Landlord and/or its contractors or consultants, and Tenant shall coordinate and cooperate with Landlord, and Tenant shall cause Tenant’s employees, vendors, and consultants to work in harmony with Landlord and Landlord’s contractors and consultants to minimize any interference or delay with respect to the construction of the Base, Shell and Core and the Tenant Improvements.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: for that injury; (3) that, considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is warranted; and (4) that the public interest would not be dis-served by a permanent injunction. eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388, 391, 126 S.Ct. 1837, 164 L.Ed.2d 641 (2006). Addressing the first factor, Hatchett has clearly suffered an irreparable injury. The Supreme Court as well as the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit have emphasized that “[t]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, even for minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373-74, 96 S.Ct. 2673, 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976) (citation omitted); see also Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 485-86, 85 S.Ct. 1116, 14 L.Ed.2d 22 (1965) (<HOLDING>); Joelner v. Vill. of Wash. Park, Ill., 378 Options: A. holding that the relevant inquiry when assessing irreparable injury is whether there is an adequate remedy in the absence of an injunction B. holding that movant must demonstrate that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction C. holding that allegation of procedural injury does not affect the issues of injury in fact or causation D. holding that an allegation of impairment to freedom of expression demonstrated an irreparable injury E. holding that potential loss of a contract constitutes irreparable injury

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that an allegation of impairment to freedom of expression demonstrated an irreparable injury
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The headings, captions, and arrangements used in any of the Loan Documents are, unless specified otherwise, for convenience only and will not be deemed to limit, amplify, or modify the terms of the Loan Documents nor to affect the meaning thereof.

assistant: Headings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Set forth on Schedule 5.17(b) is a list of all registered or issued Intellectual Property (including all applications for registration and issuance) owned by each of the Loan Parties or that each of the Loan Parties has the right to (including the name/title, current owner, registration or application number, and registration or application date).

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The waiver of any breach of any provision of this Award by either of the parties shall not constitute or operate as a waiver of any other breach of any provision of this Award, and any failure to enforce any provision of this Award in any particular instance shall not operate as a waiver of any existing or future rights, duties, or obligations arising out of this Award.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except in each case as could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, (a) the Borrower and each of the Subsidiaries owns, or is licensed or otherwise has the right to use, all trademarks, tradenames, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property material to its business, and (b) the use thereof by the Borrower and the Subsidiaries does not infringe upon the rights of any other Person.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: please note that a reservation which requires down payment or ( wholly or partly ) prepayment may be cancelled ( without a prior notice of default or warning ) insofar the relevant ( remaining ) amount ( s ) can not be collected in full on the relevant payment date in accordance with the relevant payment policy of the supplier and the reservation .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (9th Cir.1983) {en banc); United States v. Buckner, 717 F.2d 297, 299-300 (6th Cir.1983). But see United States v. Weems, 322 F.3d 18, 23 n. 3 (1st Cir.2003) (assuming, without deciding, that arrestee may object to police entry into third party’s home without a search warrant). We need not here decide whether to adopt this reasoning because, even if we were to do so, Snype might still be entitled to a taint inquiry. This is because an apparent gap in the hearing record does not permit us to conclude that either Payton or exigency supports the initial entry. Both theories require proof of a common fact to support entry into Bean’s home without a search warrant: a reasonable basis for believing that Snype was then on the premises. See Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. at 603, 100 S.Ct. 1371 (<HOLDING>); see, e.g., United States v. MacDonald, 916 Options: A. recognizing that for fourth amendment purposes an arrest warrant supported by probable cause carries with it limited authority to enter a dwelling in which a suspect lives when there is reason to believe that the suspect is within B. holding that arrest warrant can support entry into suspects residence when there is reason to believe the suspect is within C. holding that arrest warrant permits police to enter residence of person named therein to make arrest D. holding that absent exigent circumstances the fourth amendment prohibits warrantless nonconsensual entry into a suspects home in order to make a felony arrest notwithstanding the existence of probable cause to arrest E. holding that an arrest warrant can authorize entry into a dwelling only where the officials executing the warrant have reasonable or probable cause to believe the person named in the warrant is within

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that arrest warrant can support entry into suspects residence when there is reason to believe the suspect is within
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: to the fullest extent permissible by law , neither instagram nor its parent company nor any of their employees , managers , officers or agents ( collectively , the `` instagram parties '' ) make any representations or warranties or endorsements of any kind whatsoever , express or implied , as to : ( a ) the service ; ( b ) the instagram content ; ( c ) user content ; or ( d ) security associated with the transmission of information to instagram or via the service .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: The Court emphasized that reasonable strategic choices by counsel after an appropriate investigation of the facts and law are “virtually unchallengeable.” Id. at 690-91, 104 S.Ct. 2052. Those “made after less than complete investigation are reasonable precisely to the extent that reasonable professional judgments support the limitations on investigation.” .Id. The responsibility rests with petitioner to “overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action ‘might be considered sound trial strategy.’ ”, Id. at 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052 (citation omitted). The decision to. rely on the plea colloquy for evidence , related to respondent’s extreme stress, caused by his inability to support his family was found reasonable because it prevented the State from cross-e 2015) (<HOLDING>). With respect to ineffective assistance of Options: A. holding state court unreasonably applied strickland test because counsels failure to investigate expert testimony which called into doubt the central forensic evidence linking the inmate to the crime was ineffective assistance and prejudicial to defendant B. holding counsels failure to object to victim impact testimony and evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel when the trial record was silent as to counsels strategy C. holding trial counsels failure to investigate and present substantial mitigation evidence during the sentencing phase can constitute ineffective assistance of counsel D. holding that counsels failure to present expert testimony explaining a possible causal link between defendants childhood and his crime was prejudicial E. holding that the state court unreasonably applied chapman but that the error was not prejudicial under brecht

assistant: The best answer is A. holding state court unreasonably applied strickland test because counsels failure to investigate expert testimony which called into doubt the central forensic evidence linking the inmate to the crime was ineffective assistance and prejudicial to defendant
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Issuer hereby assigns to the Trustee its rights relating to the Pledged Loans under the Depositor Purchase Agreement including the rights assigned to the Issuer by the Depositor to payment due from the related Seller, or if applicable the related Approved Seller, for repurchases of Defective Loans (as such term is defined in the applicable Seller Purchase Agreement) resulting from the breach of representations and warranties under the applicable Seller Purchase Agreement or Approved Sale Agreement.

assistant: Warranties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: with the approval of the Governor and in accordance with § 5 of the Voting Rights Act, ends its current impasse and adopts its own redistricting plan. 5 . The Supreme Court has also held that courts must utilize single-member districts "[ujnless the ... [c]ourt can articulate ... a singular combination of unique factors” that justifies a different result. Chapman v. Meier, 420 U.S. 1, 21, 95 S.Ct. 751, 42 L.Ed.2d 766 (1975) (internal quotation marks omitted). The South Carolina General Assembly is already organized exclusively into single-member districts. 6 . For simplicity's sake, we refer to the Leath-erman plaintiffs simply as "Leatherman” and the Marcharía plaintiffs as the "ACLU.” 7 . See, e.g., Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 U.S. 541, 551, 119 S.Ct. 1545, 143 L.Ed.2d 731 (1999) (<HOLDING>); Smith, 946 F.Supp. at 1206 (noting that Options: A. recognizing frequent use of respect for municipal boundaries as criteria in evaluating redistricting plan B. recognizing the obviously important government interests sought to be served by the limitations on partisan political activities contained in the hatch act C. holding that redistricting plan violated state constitutional mandate and thus affirming trial courts findings that 1 D. recognizing that a redistricting plan can be driven at least to some extent by partisan interests E. holding redistricting plan would violate equal protection clause if it reflected a naked desire to increase partisan strength

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing that a redistricting plan can be driven at least to some extent by partisan interests