flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the Lender shall, within five (5) business days thereof, give written notice (a “ Default Notice ”) to the Rockpoint Preferred Holders (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of the Borrower dated as of March 10, 2017 (the “ Partnership Agreement ”)) in accordance with the notice provisions set forth in the Partnership Agreement. Such notice shall be in addition to the notice the Lender shall give to the Borrower, and shall be given concurrent therewith. Following receipt of a Default Notice, the Rockpoint Preferred Holders, or any affiliate(s) thereof or other parties designated by them (collectively, “ Rockpoint ”), shall have the right, but not the obligation, to make payment to the Lender, within thirty (30) business days of receiving the Default Notice (the period from the occurrence of the Event of Default through the expiration of such thirty (30) business day period, the “ Default Election Period ”), in an amount equal to the Default Amount (a “ Default Advance ”). During any Default Election Period, the Lender shall have no right to enforce the provisions hereof in respect of such Event of Default or pursue any remedies in connection therewith, including declaring the principal amount of the Advances or interest thereon (whether or not accrued) or any other amounts payable hereunder due and payable. In the event Rockpoint elects to make a Default Advance, such Default Advance shall be deemed to (a) cure the Event of Default and (b) be a demand loan by Rockpoint to the Borrower, and shall bear interest payable to Rockpoint monthly at a rate equal to the lesser of (i) eighteen percent (18%) per annum or, if lower, (ii) the highest rate of interest permitted under applicable law, from and after the date of the Default Advance until the date such Default Advance is repaid by the Borrower to Rockpoint in full. If Rockpoint does not elect to make a Default Advance during the Default Election Period, the Lender shall, following the expiration of the Default Election Period, be entitled to enforce the provisions hereof in respect of such Event of Default and pursue any remedies it may be entitled to at law or in equity in respect of the Event of Default, including its right to declare the principal amount of the Advances or interest thereon (whether or not accrued) or any other amounts payable hereunder due and payable. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event Rockpoint makes a Default Advance, Rockpoint shall, at any time, be entitled pursue any and all rights and remedies it may have in law or in equity against the Borrower in the event the Borrower fails to repay to Rockpoint the amount of the Default Advance or fails to pay any interest thereon to Rockpoint when due.

assistant: Remedies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Whenever possible, each provision of this Warrant shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Warrant is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable law or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or any other jurisdiction, but this Warrant shall be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: reasons given regarding Rodriguez’s fifth claim, we find no abuse of discretion in the Superior Court’s denial of Rodriguez’s request for an evidentiary hearing on this issue. Rodriguez has not met the two-prong Strickland standard to establish ineffective assistance of counsel. Moreover, he has not shown that the Superior Court abused its discretion in denying funds to retain a defense expert or denying his request for an evidentiary hearing. III. Conclusion Accordingly, we affirm the Superio ting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, 104 S.Ct. 2052). This Court is free to assume ineffective representation, or bypass it altogether, "[i]f it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, ...” Id. 12 . Holmes v. State, 422 A.2d 338, 339 (Del.1980) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, Superi- or Court Criminal Rule Options: A. holding that counsels decision not to argue the absurd or burden the jury with the obvious did not amount to ineffective assistance B. holding that violation of state law was not a per se constitutional violation C. holding counsels decision to open after the states caseinchief did not amount to a constitutional violation D. recognizing federal constitutional claim against the united states E. holding single incident of food poisoning did not amount to a violation of prisoners constitutional rights

assistant: The best answer is C. holding counsels decision to open after the states caseinchief did not amount to a constitutional violation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The invalidity of any one or more of the words, phrases, sentences, clauses, sections or subsections contained in this Agreement shall not affect the enforceability of the remaining portions of this Agreement or any part thereof, all of which are inserted conditionally on their being valid in law, and, in the event that any one or more of the words, phrases, sentences, clauses, sections or subsections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, then this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid word or words, phrase or phrases, sentence or sentences, clause or clauses, section or sections, or subsection or subsections had not been inserted.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you want to use any application program interface ( `` api '' ) exposed or made available by skype you must comply with the applicable licensing terms , which are available at www.skype.com/go/legal .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: or possessory interest in the garbage once the sanitation company picked it up. Similarly, they have not identified any other subconstitutional right or relationship that would prohibit the sanitation company from doing what it did here. For instance, defendants have not claimed that their contract with the sanitation company limited what the company could do with the garbage once the company took possession of it. On this record, defendants retained no more right to control the disposition of the garbage once they turned it over to the sanitation company than they would had they abandoned it. As this court consistently has recognized, a person retains no constitutionally protected privacy interest in abandoned property. See State v. Purvis, 249 Or 404, 410-11, 438 P2d 1002 (1968) (<HOLDING>); State v. Crandall, 340 Or 645, 653, 136 P3d Options: A. recognizing the principle that a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment B. holding that under article i section 9 a person has no constitutionally protected privacy interest in abandoned property C. holding that a person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment D. holding that any constitutionally protected property interest an employee has as a result of his employment contract is satisfied by payment of the full compensation due under the contract E. holding parental rights are constitutionally protected fundamental interest

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that under article i section 9 a person has no constitutionally protected privacy interest in abandoned property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (and because, in addition, the circuit court intended for her to be able to pursue her statutory claims), the circuit court abused its discretion in denying her motion. That issue was not addressed in Gas-kins. Moreover, the Bank’s assumption that any amendment to Ms. Walls’s complaint would have been either a futile attempt to revive a non-viable wrongful discharge claim or the bringing of a new cause of action that would not have related back begs the central question whether the relation back doctrine would have applied. We note, because it bears on the Bank’s second non-preservation argument, that whether a claim stated in an amended complaint relates back to the original complaint is a question of law. See Chambers v. Seghetti, 107 Md.App. 536, 540-41, 668 A.2d 1006 (1995) (<HOLDING>). In this case, the order denying the motion to Options: A. holding that the plaintiffs second complaint did not relate back to her first complaint because her second complaint was not an amendment to her first complaint but rather a separate filing B. holding that as a matter of law claim stated in amended complaint did not relate back to original complaint C. holding that amended complaint related back where the facts alleged in the original complaint clearly put defendants on notice as to the conduct at issue in this action D. holding that the amended complaint could not relate back to the original complaint in which all claims were barred by the statute of limitations E. holding original complaint was admission where it alleged an accident occurred on a different date than the amended complaint

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that as a matter of law claim stated in amended complaint did not relate back to original complaint
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the target, attempted to use a debit card stolen during the May 11 robbery, and continued to participate in the conspiracy from prison by offering to pay Levatte several thousand dollars to falsely inculpate another woman in the robberies. Given this testimony as well as other evidence, there is no reasonable possibility Thomas’s statement from the holding cell contributed to the jury’s finding she was involved in the charged conspiracy. Additionally, Thomas’s false exculpatory statement was not “closely tied to” the non-conspiracy offenses with which she was convicted, and therefore “could have made little difference to the jury verdict.” See Arbolaez, 450 F.3d at 1293. Aside from the conspiracy charge, Thomas was convicted on Counts Two and Three for committing an arm h Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). 3 . In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d Options: A. holding that a permanent change in income constitutes a substantial change in circumstances justifying a reduction of alimony B. holding court cannot change custody without showing that change is in best interests of child C. holding that a showing of a change in circumstances that is or is likely to be beneficial to the child may also warrant a change in custody D. holding an initial edwards violation was vitiated by a onenight break in interrogation a change in place of the interrogations a change of identity of the interrogators and a change of the subject matter of the interrogations E. holding that a change of venue has no affect on the applicable state law and that change of venue is but a change of courtrooms

assistant: The best answer is D. holding an initial edwards violation was vitiated by a onenight break in interrogation a change in place of the interrogations a change of identity of the interrogators and a change of the subject matter of the interrogations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event of Officer’s death during the term of this Agreement, Officer’s employment shall be deemed to have terminated as of the last day of the month during which his death occurs and Corporation shall pay to his estate or such beneficiaries as Officer may from time to time designate all accrued Base Salary, any benefits under any defined contribution or health and welfare benefit plans of Corporation in which Officer is a participant to the full extent of Officer’s rights under such plans, accrued vacation pay and any appropriate business expenses incurred by Officer in connection with his duties hereunder, all to the date of termination, and full vesting of all awards granted to the Officer under the Incentive Plans, but Officer’s estate shall not be paid any other compensation or reimbursement of any kind, including without limitation, severance compensation.

assistant: Death
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Co-Borrowers represent and warrant that (a) no Default has occurred and is continuing, or would result from the increase in Commitments described in this Commitment Increase Agreement and (b) immediately before and after the increase in the Commitments described in this Commitment Increase Agreement, the Loan Parties are in pro forma compliance with the financial covenants in Section 7.09 of the Credit Agreement, as demonstrated on Annex 1 attached hereto.

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: is against such retroactive application,” id. at 2-3 (citing Baynes v. AT & T Technologies, Inc., 976 F.2d 1370 (11th Cir.1992); Gersman v. Group Health Ass’n, Inc., 975 F.2d 886 (D.C.Cir.1992); Holt v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 974 F.2d 771 (6th Cir.1992) (citing Vogel v. City of Cincinnati, 959 F.2d 594 (6th Cir.1992)); Johnson v. Uncle Ben’s, Inc., 965 F.2d 1363 (5th Cir.1992); Mozee v. American Commercial Marine Service Co., 963 F.2d 929 (7th Cir.1992); Fray v. Omaha World Herald Co., 960 F.2d 1370 (8th Cir.1992); EEOC Notice No. 915.002 (Dec. 27, 1991) (finding that the damages provisions of the 1991 Act do not apply retroactively to conduct occurring prior to the effective date of the 1991 Act); but see Davis v. City and County of San Francisco, 976 F.2d 1536 (9th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>), reh’g denied, vacated in part, remanded, 984 Options: A. holding that congress intended the courts to apply the civil rights act of 1991 to cases pending at the time of its enactment and to preact conduct still open to challenge after that time B. holding that the damages and jury trial provisions of the 1991 act apply to conduct occurring prior to the date of enactment C. recognizing that aedpa would not apply to a habeas petition that was pending at the time of its enactment D. holding that section 102 of the civil rights act of 1991 does not apply to preenactment conduct E. holding that conduct prior to passage of the civil rights act of 1991 is admissible to provide context and background

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that congress intended the courts to apply the civil rights act of 1991 to cases pending at the time of its enactment and to preact conduct still open to challenge after that time
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: against Defendants-Appellees Arab Republic of Egypt and the National Bank of Egypt on the grounds that the defendants are immune from suit under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602-1611. In the alternative, the district court concluded that the suit should be dismissed under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. On appeal, the plaintiffs contend that the district court erred in finding that none of the exceptions to the Act applies, and in concluding that this case should be heard in, an Egyptian forum. We affirm on the basis of the district court’s alternative holding that this case should be dismissed under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. See Sinochem Int’l Co. v. Malay. Int'l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422, 425, 127 S.Ct. 1184, 167 L.Ed.2d 15 (2007) (<HOLDING>). In order to determine whether to dismiss a Options: A. holding that a district court may dismiss based on forum non conveniens without first addressing personal jurisdiction B. holding that a court can dismiss a case under forum non conveniens before resolving any other jurisdictional issues C. holding that a district court has discretion to grant a defendants forum non conveniens motion to transfer before disposing of any other threshold challenges D. holding that issue concerning forum non conveniens decision was not suitable for interlocutory appeal in part because a forum non conveniens decision is inherently factsensitive E. holding that federal courts may not consider other issues before resolving standing an article iii jurisdictional matter

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a court can dismiss a case under forum non conveniens before resolving any other jurisdictional issues
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: respect to this group of documents. Gov’t Mot. for Summ. J. at 6. It is true that Stein did not specifically contest this point in his appeal letter. He disputed the SEC’s withholding decision under Exemption 7(A) — which, according to the SEC, was also the exemption under which the SEC was withholding some documents related to the second document category. See Compl., Ex. D at 1 n.l. But his appeal letter also specifically demanded — twice—“all of the requested documents,” not just documents related to the. first category. See Compl., Ex. E at 1-2. The government is obligated to construe FOIA requests — and appeals — liberally, where a request is “reasonably susceptible to the broader reading.” See LaCedra v. Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, 317 F.3d 345, 347-48 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (<HOLDING>). While Stein’s appeal letter could have been Options: A. holding that a foia request should be read to seek all documents covered by a catchall B. holding that foia exemptions are not mandatory bars to disclosure because the purpose of foia is to provide broad disclosure of government documents C. holding that a contract should be read to give reasonable meaning to all provisions of that contract D. holding that the agency did not have an obligation to search for and produce the documents the plaintiff claimed entitlement to because the plaintiffs foia request gave no indication that she sought those particular documents E. holding that related provisions should be read together

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a foia request should be read to seek all documents covered by a catchall
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: are shown: a written agreement to arbitrate, a dispute within the scope of the arbitration agreement, and a refusal to arbitrate. Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Watts Industries, Inc., 417 F.3d 682, 687 (7th Cir.2005). Only the third element is at issue here. Relying primarily on cases from the Second and Third circuits, Pushpin argues that a refusal to arbitrate can be established only if the non-moving party files a lawsuit or is ordered to arbitrate a dispute and fails to do so. See, e.g., LAIF X SPRL v. Axtel, S.A. de C.V., 390 F.3d 194, 198 (2d Cir.2004) (“A party has refused to arbitrate if it commences litigation or is ordered to arbitrate th[e] dispute [by the relevant arbitral authority] and fails to do so.”); PaineWebber Inc. v. Faragalli, 61 F.3d 1063, 1066 (3d Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). In PaineWebber, the Third Circuit held that Options: A. holding that because a valid arbitration clause existed the parties had to arbitrate all disputes when the subject matter of the dispute has a reasonable relationship to the subject matter of the contract B. holding that a dispute arising out of an insurance policy was not covered by the arbitration provision in the parties separate premium payment agreement because if the party had intended to subject this dispute to the arbitration provision it could easily clearly and unequivocally have done so either by including an arbitration provision in the insurance policy itself or by adding to the above arbitration provision C. holding that an action to compel arbitration accrues only when the respondent unequivocally refuses to arbitrate either by failing to comply with an arbitration demand or by otherwise unambiguously manifesting an intention not to arbitrate the subject matter of the dispute D. holding that purpose of stay pending arbitration is twofold it relieves the party entitled to arbitrate of the burden of continuing to litigate the issue while the arbitration process is ongoing and it entitles that party to proceed immediately to arbitration without the delay that would be occasioned by an appeal of the district courts order to arbitrate E. holding respondent refused to arbitrate where it neither opposed nor responded to petitioners arbitration demand letter

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that an action to compel arbitration accrues only when the respondent unequivocally refuses to arbitrate either by failing to comply with an arbitration demand or by otherwise unambiguously manifesting an intention not to arbitrate the subject matter of the dispute
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If the aggregate amount of the Lenders’ Commitments is increased in accordance with this Section, the Administrative Agent and the Borrower shall determine the effective date (the " Revolving Credit Increase Effective Date ") and the final allocation of such increase. The Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the Borrower and the Lenders of the final allocation of such increase and the Revolving Credit Increase Effective Date. The terms and provisions of any such increase shall be identical to those of the Loans, other than in respect of any arrangement, commitment or upfront fees payable to any Lenders providing such increase.

assistant: Effective Dates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: access. See Jessup v. Luther, 277 F.3d 926, 928 (7th Cir.2002) (“When there is a compelling interest in secrecy, as in the case of ... the privacy of children, portions and in extreme cases the entirety of a trial record can be sealed ... The interest in secrecy is weighed against the competing interests case by case.”). Louisiana statutes similarly reflect a public policy favoring confidentiality of juvenile court proceedings involving children. LA. CH. CODE Arts. 407, 412. Juvenile courts in Louisiana have jurisdiction over proceedings involving children in need of care, including cases of child abuse, and records of those proceedings are also regarded as confidential. LA. CH. CODE Art. 307. “These measures all reflect a strong public policy fa 855 F.2d 178, 181 (4th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). Courts have also recognized, however, that Options: A. holding that in reviewing the petition the court is to weigh the policy of public access to records against the longstanding public policy of providing a second chance to criminal defendants who have not been adjudicated guilty B. recognizing that intent of public records act is to provide all citizens with access to the records of all public governmental bodies C. holding that when state law prohibited discovery of records of a medical review committee the district court should have determined whether the records came within the statutes coverage and if so whether the right of access nevertheless outweighed the public policy expressed by state law D. holding that ajlthough the decision we review is that of declining to unseal the records the issue is whether the records should have been sealed in the first place and the one who seeks to overcome the expectation of access bears the burden of establishing the requisite important state interest E. holding that determination of whether an official was acting on behalf of the state or the local government is determined by state law

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that when state law prohibited discovery of records of a medical review committee the district court should have determined whether the records came within the statutes coverage and if so whether the right of access nevertheless outweighed the public policy expressed by state law
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS SECOND AMENDMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES UNDER THIS SECOND AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If a Participant experiences a Substantial Employment Change following a Change in Control, the Participant’s Account Balance will be immediately increased so that the Account Balance is not less than the lump sum Actuarial Equivalent of the present value of the Target Retirement Benefit. The Participant will receive a distribution of his or her revised Account Balance upon termination, death or disability on the same basis as any other Participant.

assistant: Change In Control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: intervene. See Hawaii-Pacific Venture Capital Corp. v. Rothbard, 564 F.2d 1343, 1346 (9th Cir.1977). If the appellants’ only interest in the present case was to ensure that the MTCA would have sufficient resources to satisfy any judgment they may be able to obtain in the territorial court action, the district court’s reasoning and conclusion would be sound. The district court’s holding, however, does not recognize that the appellants claim an interest in a specific fund being held in the district court’s registry. While a mere economic interest may be insufficient to support the right to intervene, an intervenor’s interest in a specific fund is sufficient to entitle intervention in a case affecting that fund. See, e.g., Gaines v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., 434 F.2d 52, 53-54 (5th Cir.1970) (<HOLDING>); Hardy-Latham v. Wellons, 415 F.2d 674 (4th Options: A. holding contingency fee cases commenced prior to dissolution are assets of the firm B. holding that insurance defense law firm did not have nearpermanent relationship with its clients C. holding that law firm was liable for restitution of contingency fee but not of other noncontingent fees following vacatur of judgment D. holding that workers compensation insurer was required to intervene in injured employees tort action to protect and enforce its subrogation lien and could not file a separate action E. holding that a law firm could intervene in a former clients action to protect its interest in its contingency fee

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a law firm could intervene in a former clients action to protect its interest in its contingency fee
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed by the Parties on any number of separate counterparts, by facsimile or email, and all of those counterparts taken together will be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument; signature pages may be detached from multiple separate counterparts and attached to a single counterpart so that all signatures are physically attached to the same document. A facsimile or portable document format (“.pdf”) signature page will constitute an original for the purposes of this Section 4.1.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: From August 2, 2016 until September 16, 2016, Company provided due diligence material (the “Company Due Diligence Material”) to Buyer, and answered questions from Buyer with regard to that material. Company represents and warrants that, other than as listed on Schedule 3.1 , there have been no material changes to the Company Due Diligence Material that have not been previously disclosed to Buyer.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: included only cognitive and achievement tests. Doc. No. 85 at 5. Based on deficiencies identified in the 1998 BCH evaluation, the parents believe that Tingley also should have evaluated J.B.’s motor skills, speech/language skills, social/emotional skills, pragmatic skills, visual abilities, vocational/life skills, and adaptive behavior. Id. at 9. The [¶] appears to have rejected the parents’ argument as time-barred. A.R. 1 at 14. This conclusion was based on the fact that the allegedly improper evaluation occurred in May 2002, more than two years before the parents requested a due process hearing. See Conn. GemStat. § 10-76h(a)(3) (2002) (current version at Conn. Gen-Stat. § 10-76h(a)(4) (2007)) (setting a two-year statute of limitations for IDEA claims); M.D., 334 F.3d at 221-222 (<HOLDING>). The HO’s conclusion was correct. Without Options: A. recognizing that idea is simply not an antidiscrimination statute so that pure discrimination claim was not barred by parents failure to exhaust remedies under idea B. holding that the charge was timely when filed within the statute of limitations period even though served after the period C. holding that the threeyear statute of limitations applicable to 1983 actions in arkansas governed idea claims D. holding that damages are not relief that is available under the idea E. holding that in an idea case state law sets the relevant limitations period

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that in an idea case state law sets the relevant limitations period
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: In that case, jurisdiction existed when the case was filed and the question was whether the amended complaint subsequently divested the court of jurisdiction; here, plaintiffs argue the inverse. Id. Similarly, several other cases relied on by plaintiffs relate to amended rather than supplemental complaints, and thus are not on point. 4 . Recent cases bring into question whether the statutory limitations implicated in these cases are truly jurisdictional or are "nonjuris-dictional ‘claim-processing rules.’” See Gonzalez v. Thaler, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 641, 648, 181 L.Ed.2d 619 (2012) (noting that in the past, the Court was less than meticulous in rendering statutory language jurisdictional); Henderson ex rel. Henderson v. Shinseki, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1197, 179 L.Ed.2d 159 (2011) (<HOLDING>); Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, — U.S. -, Options: A. holding that the federal expert witness compensation rules are in direct conflict with the state rules even when the state rules allow for a greater recovery B. holding that a 120day filing deadline for seeking review by the us court of appeals for veterans claims was a claimprocessing rule that lacked jurisdictional attributes C. holding that the 120day filing deadline at issue was ajmong the types of rules that should not be described as jurisdictional but rather claim processing rules D. holding that the 180day filing deadline is jurisdictional and mandatory E. holding that an agency filing deadline set forth in a regulation as a rule of administrative convenience is not jurisdictional

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the 120day filing deadline at issue was ajmong the types of rules that should not be described as jurisdictional but rather claim processing rules
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries has timely filed or caused to be filed all Tax returns and reports required to have been filed and has paid or caused to be paid all Taxes required to have been paid by it, except (a) any Taxes that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which the Borrower or such Subsidiary, as applicable, has set aside on its books adequate reserves or (b) to the extent that the failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall be entitled to withhold from any amounts payable under this Agreement, any federal, state, local or foreign withholding or other taxes or charges which the Company is required to withhold. The Company shall be entitled to rely on an opinion of counsel if any questions as to the amount or requirement of withholding shall arise.

assistant: Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the Bedard residence because they submitted when the defendants, through a show of authority, placed a restraint on their freedom. In response, defendants assert that the request to evacuate was not a seizure, but that in any event, they are entitled to qualified immunity. As a threshold matter, we note that Estate member Laurie does not allege to have been inside the Bedard residence at any point during the day at issue. As a result, Laurie could not have been ordered to leave the Bedard residence by the defendants, and her Fourth Amendment claim premised on these actions fails. With regard to Isabel’s and Arlene’s claims, an order to evacuate through a show of authority may be regarded as a “seizure.” See Thames Shipyard & Repair Co. v. United States, 350 F.3d 247, 259 (1st Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). It is irrelevant that Arlene and Isabel were Options: A. recognizing that an officers forcible rape of a woman violates her substantive due process rights B. holding that the vessel owner had a responsibility to correct the positioning of the gangway C. holding that the discretionary function exception applied where the coast guard had implied statutory authority to order the evacuation of a sinking ship D. holding forcible extraction of the contents of defendants stomach shocks the conscience and violates due process E. holding that the coast guards forcible evacuation of a sinking sea vessel constituted a seizure of the persons therein

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the coast guards forcible evacuation of a sinking sea vessel constituted a seizure of the persons therein
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Should any provision of this Agreement be held by a court of law to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be replaced by such provision as most closely reflects the intent of the invalid provision, and the legality, validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement will not be affected or impaired thereby.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed, including execution by facsimile or electronically transmitted signature, in multiple counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and all of which together will be deemed to be one and the same instrument.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and each counterpart, when executed, shall have the efficacy of a signed original. Photographic copies of such signed counterparts may be used in lieu of the originals for any purpose.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All insurance premiums due and payable with respect to the Mortgaged Property have been paid in full, no notice of cancellation has been received with respect to such policies and, to Borrower’s knowledge, Borrower is in compliance, in all material respects, with all conditions contained in such policies.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: above, was subsequently rejected by the New York Court of Appeals in Snyder, Snyder did not purport to deal with Askey’s views of the availability of damages or of equitable relief in the form of medical monitoring. Nor are we aware of any other New York Court of Appeals case that has addressed this issue. Following Askey, New York intermediate appellate courts and trial-level courts have continued to rule that plaintiffs who have been tortiously exposed to toxic substances and can show that they have a rational'basis for their fear of developing cancer may be allowed to recover the cost of medical monitoring as an element of reasonably anticipated consequential damages. See, e.g., Osarczuk v. Associated Universities, Inc., 36 A.D.3d 872, 877, 830 N.Y.S.2d 711, 715 (2d Dep’t 2007) (<HOLDING>). As indicated in Part II.A.2. above, the “ Options: A. holding that negligence does not violate the due process clause but reserving the question whether gross negligence does B. holding that ordinary negligence and gross negligence are not separate causes of action C. holding medical monitoring and other injunctive relief available as remedies for claims of negligence and gross negligence in causing exposure to hazardous nonnuclear chemicals and substances D. holding that cjulpable negligence is negligence of a gross and flagrant character which evinces a reckless disregard for the safety of others E. holding that the preclusion of tort remedies for only economic loss extended to negligence claims

assistant: The best answer is C. holding medical monitoring and other injunctive relief available as remedies for claims of negligence and gross negligence in causing exposure to hazardous nonnuclear chemicals and substances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company hereby agrees to indemnify you and hold you harmless (including advancement of reasonable attorney’s fees) to the fullest extent permitted by law against and in respect of any and all actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, judgments, costs, expenses, losses, and damages resulting from the your good faith performance of your duties and obligations with the Company and the Company’s affiliates. The Company shall cover you under directors’ and officers’ liability insurance both during and, while potential liability exists, after the term of this letter agreement in the same amount and to the same extent as the Company covers its other officers and directors. These obligations shall survive the termination of the your employment with the Company.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: the services may contain links to third-party websites , applications or other third-party services , and you understand that by accessing third-party links , you may be exposed to content that is offensive , harmful , inaccurate or otherwise inappropriate .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 2. The Contractor shall not, without the State’s prior written consent, copy, disclose, publish, release, transfer, disseminate, use, or allow access for any purpose or in any form, any Confidential Information except for the sole and exclusive purpose of performing under the Contract.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Such Lessor is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of its incorporation, formation or organization and is in good standing and is authorized to transact business in each state in which it conducts business. Such Lessor has all requisite corporate, partnership or other (as the case may be) right, power, authority and legal capacity to execute and deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder, and to consummate the transactions contemplated herein.

assistant: Authority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: You agree to cooperate with the Progressive Group and/or any entity thereof, as well as any entity operating on its or their behalf, in response to all reasonable requests relating to your former job duties, including requests for such information as the location of documents or information and disclosure of all passwords necessary or desirable to the Progressive Group’s access of information that you password-protected on the information systems or the Progressive Group or any entity thereof. You further agree to cooperate with the Progressive Group and/or any entity thereof, as well as any entity operating on its or their behalf, in connection with any investigation or legal proceeding arising out of matters that were under your responsibility or that were related to, or caused by, your actions.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: robbery due to their association with Gist, we agree with the District Court that the probative value of the disputed evidence was not “substantially outweighed by the danger of ... unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.” Fed.R.Evid. 403. The evidence did not speak to the appellants’ character because there was no proof that the appellants had committed the post office robbery. Proof that they were being investigated alone is substantially less prejudicial than evidence of the commission of a crime. The possible prejudicial effect of the post office robbery evidence, therefore, did not substantially outweigh its probative value. See United States v. Jones, 566 F.3d 353, 365 (3d Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>). The appellants claim that the disputed Options: A. holding that evidence of gang involvement was properly admitted to prove motive for participating in the alleged crimes B. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting highly probative and relevant evidence of other crimes C. holding that evidence of prior drug sales was sufficiently similar to the crimes charged to be probative of the fact that the defendant was not merely an innocent driver who was involved in the drug transaction by accident D. holding that evidence of violent crimes and other illegal activities of defendants gang was not unduly prejudicial because defendant was not directly implicated and the evidence was probative of elements of the crimes that the defendant was charged with E. holding that it was error to admit into evidence a gun purchased by the defendant which was not connected with the charged crimes

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that evidence of violent crimes and other illegal activities of defendants gang was not unduly prejudicial because defendant was not directly implicated and the evidence was probative of elements of the crimes that the defendant was charged with