flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: interest in the property at that time, a dower/curtesy interest, as an inchoate right, is merely an expectancy of an interest or a future interest contingent upon him surviving Sharron.... Hence, since the property was in Sharron’s name only and she was alive at the time of the foreclosure, First Union had a mortgage on the full interest in the property. Id. See also Whisman v. Whisman, 2009 WL 2971552 (Ky.App. Sept. 18, 2009) (unpublished) (“Our courts have long recognized that a spouse’s right of action for a dower or curtesy interest does not accrue until the death of the other spouse with the surviving spouse ‘not entitled to any interest until the happening of that event[.]’ ”); Tucker v. Grace Enterprises of Kentucky, LLC, 2004 WL 2566518 (Ky.App. Nov. 12, 2004) (unpublished) (<HOLDING>). United Bank concludes that pursuant to Options: A. holding that a tax appeal on real property is a lien on the real estate and not a personal obligation of the landowner B. holding witness not licensed as real estate appraiser could not testify as expert on real estate valuation where statute made it unlawful to engage in real estate appraisal without license C. holding prospectively that a vendees interest in a real estate contract constitutes real estate within the meaning of the judgment lien statute D. holding a judgment lien does not attach to a husbands curtesy interest in real estate E. holding the real estate sale proceeds

assistant: The best answer is D. holding a judgment lien does not attach to a husbands curtesy interest in real estate
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No failure or delay on the part of the Servicer, the Seller, the Issuer or the Indenture Trustee in exercising any power or right hereunder (to the extent such Person has any power or right hereunder) shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such power or right preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other power or right. No notice to or demand on any party hereto in any case shall entitle it to any notice or demand in similar or other circumstances. No waiver or approval by any party hereto under this Agreement shall, except as may otherwise be stated in such waiver or approval, be applicable to subsequent transactions. No waiver or approval under this Agreement shall require any similar or dissimilar waiver or approval thereafter to be granted hereunder.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you further acknowledge that by submitting user content , no confidential , fiduciary , contractually implied or other relationship is created between you and the company other than pursuant to this eula .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts (including via facsimile and electronic image scan (PDF), each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The failure of any party hereto at any time to require performance by another party of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the right of such party to require performance of that provision, and any waiver by any party of any breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any continuing or succeeding breach of such provision, a waiver of the provision itself, or a waiver of any right under this Agreement.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company has filed all reports, schedules, forms, statements and other documents required to be filed by the Company under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, including pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) thereof, for the two years preceding the date hereof (or such shorter period as the Company was required by law or regulation to file such material) (the foregoing materials, including the exhibits thereto and documents incorporated by reference therein, being collectively referred to herein as the “ SEC Reports ”) on a timely basis or has received a valid extension of such time of filing and has filed any such SEC Reports prior to the expiration of any such extension. As of their respective dates, the SEC Reports complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as applicable, and none of the SEC Reports, when filed, contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The Company has never been an issuer subject to Rule 144(i) under the Securities Act. The financial statements of the Company included in the SEC Reports comply in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements and the rules and regulations of the Commission with respect thereto as in effect at the time of filing. Such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (“ GAAP ”), except as may be otherwise specified in such financial statements or the notes thereto and except that unaudited financial statements may not contain all footnotes required by GAAP, and fairly present in all material respects the financial position of the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of and for the dates thereof and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended, subject, in the case of unaudited statements, to normal, immaterial, year-end audit adjustments.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company confirms that neither it nor any other Person acting on its behalf has provided the Holder or its agents or counsel with any information that constitutes or would reasonably be expected to constitute material, non-public information concerning the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, other than the existence of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the other Exchange Documents. The Company understands and confirms that the Holder will rely on the foregoing representations in effecting transactions in securities of the Company. All disclosure provided to the Holder regarding the Company and its Subsidiaries, their businesses and the transactions contemplated hereby, including the schedules to this Agreement, furnished by or on behalf of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is true and correct in all material respects and does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. Each press release issued by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries during the twelve (12) months preceding the date of this Agreement did not at the time of release contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading. No event or circumstance has occurred or information exists with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or its or their business, properties, liabilities, prospects, operations (including results thereof) or conditions (financial or otherwise), which, under applicable law, rule or regulation, requires public disclosure at or before the date hereof or announcement by the Company but which has not been so publicly announced or disclosed.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Nothing in this Section 13.9 shall limit the enforceability (other than as specifically set out herein), legality or validity of this Guarantee or prevent the Secured Parties from claiming in court that the provision of this Guarantee and/or making payments under this Guarantee by the relevant German Guarantor does not fall within the scope of sections 30 and 31 of the GmbHG. The agreement of the Secured Parties to abstain from demanding any or part of the payment under this Guarantee in accordance with the provisions above shall not constitute a waiver ( Verzicht ) of any right granted under this Agreement or any other Loan Document to the Secured Parties. No reduction of the amount enforceable under the Guarantee in accordance with the above limitations will prejudice the rights of the Secured Parties to continue enforcing such guarantee and/or indemnity (subject always to the restrictions set out in this Section 13.9 at the time of such enforcement) until full and irrevocable satisfaction of all amounts owed under the Guarantee.

assistant: No Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Series Holder, severally, agrees to reimburse and indemnify the Agent for and against any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses, advances or disbursements including, without limitation, all costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with the collection of the Series Notes and/or enforcement of the Series Notes, of any kind or nature whatsoever which may be imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against the Agent in any way relating to or arising out of the Series Notes or any action taken or omitted by the Agent under the Series Notes in proportion to each Series Holder’s pro rata share, all of the foregoing as they may arise, be asserted or be imposed from time to time; provided , however , that no Series Holder shall be liable for any portion of such liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses, advances or disbursements resulting from the Agent’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. The obligations of the Series Holders under this Section 8(e) shall survive the payment in full of the Obligations and the termination of the Series Notes.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement (together with the Confidentiality Agreement, the Transaction Documents and any other documents and instruments executed pursuant hereto) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Except for the provisions of Sections 6.7 and 9.10 (which from and after the Closing are intended for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, the Persons referred to therein and by their respective heirs and representatives) and the provisions of Section 8.3 , this Section 9.6 , Section 9.7 , Section 9.12 and Section 9.15 (which are intended for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, the Financing Sources under the Debt Financing, nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to or shall confer upon any Person other than the parties any right, benefit or remedy of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged unless the modification, waiver or discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by both the Employee and by an authorized officer of the Company (other than the Employee). No waiver by either party of any breach of, or of compliance with, any condition or provision of this Agreement by the other party shall be considered a waiver of any other condition or provision, or of the same condition or provision at another time.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one in the same instrument. This Agreement may be executed and delivered by the signing and delivery of this Agreement with original signatures or by facsimile or pdf copy. As used in this Agreement, the term “this Agreement” shall include all attachments, exhibits, schedules, riders and addenda.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise provided in Section 3, your right to receive a credit of Share Units shall be forfeited automatically without further action or notice in the event that you cease to be employed by Teradata through the end of the Performance Period. The Share Units credited to your Account that have not yet vested pursuant to Section 2(a) shall be forfeited automatically without further action or notice if you cease to be employed by Teradata prior to a Vesting Date other than as provided in Sections 2(a)(ii), (iii) or (v).

assistant: Forfeitures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive agrees that during the Employment Period, Executive will devote his/her full business time, energies and talents to serving as the Senior Vice President Community Banking of the Employer, at the direction of the Chief Executive Officer of the Employwer (the “ CEO ”). Executive shall have such duties and responsibilities as may be assigned to Executive from time to time by the CEO, which duties and responsibilities shall be commensurate with Executive’s position, shall perform all duties assigned to Executive faithfully and efficiently, subject to the direction of the CEO, and shall have such authorities and powers as are inherent to the undertakings applicable to Executive’s position and necessary to carry out the responsibilities and duties required of Executive hereunder. Executive will perform the duties required by this Agreement at the Company’s principal place of business unless the nature of such duties requires otherwise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, during the Employment Period, Executive may devote reasonable time to activities other than those required under this Agreement, including activities of a charitable, educational, religious or similar nature (including professional associations) to the extent such activities do not, in the reasonable judgment of the CEO, inhibit, prohibit, interfere with or conflict with Executive’s duties under this Agreement or conflict in any material way with the business of the Employer and its Affiliates; provided, however, that Executive shall not serve on the board of directors of any business (other than the Employer or its Affiliates) or hold any other position with any business without receiving the prior written consent of the CEO.

assistant: Duties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: symptoms may include lightheadedness , altered vision , twitching , jerking or shaking of limbs , disorientation , confusion , loss of consciousness , or convulsions .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: with a portion of the surface defining the bone opening “to restrict movement of the bone screw” and to block “fluid flow from the opening of the bone,” col. 3, 11. 8-12; claims 4, 5, 15 and 16; and (3)' engagement of the seat portion (top plane of the screw’s body portion) with the connecting member (e.g., the spine plate) “to establish the axial location of the connecting member along the bone screw,” col. 3, II. 19-21; claims 14 and 16. These three uses of the term require a meaning broad enough to apply to each of these interfaces. Digital Biometrics, Inc. v. Identix, Inc., 149 F.3d 1335, 1345 (Fed.Cir.1998) (“[T]he same word appearing in the same claim should be interpreted consistently.”); Fonar Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson, 821 F.2d 627, 632, 3 USPQ2d 1109, 1113 (Fed.Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). Contrary to Danek’s assertion, “engage” Options: A. holding that statements made during the prosecution history may commit the applicant to a particular meaning for a patent term which meaning is then binding in litigation B. holding a technical term used in a patent document is interpreted as having the meaning that it would be given by persons experienced in the field of the invention unless it is apparent from the patent and the prosecution history that the inventor used the term with a different meaning C. holding that the meaning of a term in a claim must be consistent with its appearance in other claims in the same patent D. recognizing that the court must give meaning to all the words in the claims E. holding that when a term is not defined in a contract the presumption is that the term is to be given its ordinary meaning and significance

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the meaning of a term in a claim must be consistent with its appearance in other claims in the same patent
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Employee shall be employed by the Company (the “Initial Employment Term”) under this Agreement commencing as of the date signed below (“Effective Date”), and for a period of 24 months, subject to earlier termination or extension as provided herein. This agreement will automatically renew upon the successful completion of an initial public offering. A successful initial public offering is defined as listing the company stock on a national security exchange and raising a minimum of $3,000,000 dollars (three-million).

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: (b) If either party is required (by interrogatories, requests for information or documents, subpoena, civil investigative demand or similar process) to disclose any Confidential Information, it is agreed that such party will provide the other party with prompt notice of such request so that such other party may seek an appropriate protective order and/or waive the notifying party's compliance with the provisions of this Agreement.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 569 (6th Cir.2006); Picker Int’l, Inc. v. Mayo Found., 6 F.Supp.2d 685, 688 (N.D.Ohio 1998); Chemtrol, 537 N.E.2d at 630; Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. General Elec. Co., 656 F.Supp. 49, 56-61 (S.D.Ohio 1986). Other cases actually support the Ohio Plaintiffs’ arguments, distinguishing between commercial buyers and ordinary consumers. See Avery Dennison Corp. v. Soliant LLC, No. 1:04CV1865, 2005 WL 2035511, at *2 (N.D.Ohio Aug. 23, 2005); Cincinnati Gas, 656 F.Supp. at 56-61. And although the Sixth Circuit recently applied Ohio’s economic loss rule to bar an individual’s claim against a drug testing company, the plaintiff in that case was not a consumer who purchased the defendant’s product at the end of the supply chain. Sagraves v. Lab One, Inc., 316 Fed.Appx. 366, 369 (6th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). The only contrary case on point provides no Options: A. holding economic loss doctrine bars negligence claim based on service contract B. holding that the economic loss doctrine barred a negligence claim without regard to whether the parties were in privity of contract C. holding cause of action for negligence against manufacturer of defective buses was barred by the economic loss rule notwithstanding absence of privity D. holding that economic loss rule barred negligence claim because plaintiff could not show drug testing company had duty to protect against loss of his job as result of allegedly faulty test E. holding that economic loss rule barred claim for breach of fiduciary duty where plaintiffs claim arose solely as a result of the existence of a contract between the parties

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that economic loss rule barred negligence claim because plaintiff could not show drug testing company had duty to protect against loss of his job as result of allegedly faulty test
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Secured Party, by accepting the benefits of the Loan Documents, agrees that (i) any action taken by Agent or the Required Lenders (or, if expressly required hereby, a greater proportion of the Lenders) in accordance with the provisions of the Loan Documents, (ii) any action taken by Agent in reliance upon the instructions of Required Lenders (or, where so required, such greater proportion) and (iii) the exercise by Agent or the Required Lenders (or, where so required, such greater proportion) of the powers set forth herein or therein, together with such other powers as are incidental thereto, shall be authorized and binding upon all of the Secured Parties.

assistant: Binding Effects
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: she “had no justifiable expectation that h[er] ‘friends’ would keep h[er] profile private.... ” U.S. v. Meregildo, 2012 WL 3264501, at *2 (S.D.N.Y.2012). In fact, “the wider h[er] circle of ‘friends,’ the more likely [her] posts would be viewed by someone [s]he never expected to see them.” Id. Thus, as the Second Circuit has recognized, legitimate expectations of privacy may be lower in e-mails or other Internet transmissions. U.S. v. Lifshitz, 369 F.3d 173, 190 (2d Cir.2004) (contrasting privacy expectation of e-mail with greater expectation of privacy of materials located on a person’s computer). Reid v. Ingerman Smith LLP, No. CV2012-0307(ILG)(MDG), 2012 WL 6720752, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 2012); see also Tompkins v. Detroit Metro. Airport, 278 F.R.D. 387, 388 (E.D.Mich.2012) (<HOLDING>); Mailhoit v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 285 Options: A. recognizing that commission is not bound by statutory or common law rules of evidence B. holding that material posted on a private facebook page that is accessible to a selected group of recipients but not available for viewing by the general public is generally not privileged nor is it protected by common law or civil law notions of privacy C. holding that private possession of child pornography is not protected by the first amendment D. holding that it is not E. holding that the sca does not apply to material that is readily available to the public

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that material posted on a private facebook page that is accessible to a selected group of recipients but not available for viewing by the general public is generally not privileged nor is it protected by common law or civil law notions of privacy
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: abstract, underlies the determination of items such as the amount, timing, and characterization of items of income, credit, gain, loss, deduction. Appellant's Br. 43-45. The government, however, fails to explain why partner identity would be necessary to determine those items on the facts of this particular case. As explained above, whether a particular item qualifies as a partnership item turns on the specific facts of the case. The government's abstract argument, therefore, is insufficient. 8 . The IRS did cite I.R.C. § 465 in the FPAAs and assert that the transactions did not increase the partners’ amounts at risk. While the Court of Federal Claims placed substantive significance on the citation to I.R. 195716, at *---, 1990 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 695, at *47-49 (Tax Ct. Dec. 10, 1990) (<HOLDING>); and Weiner v. United States, 389 F.3d 152, Options: A. holding that spouse could not claim exemption in property that was only property of other spouses estate B. holding that the debtor could retain exempt property because it was not property of the estate C. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property D. holding that overvaluation penalty did not apply where the taxpayers conceded other grounds of adjustment in the notice of deficiency including that they lacked a profit objective that the property at issue was not qualifying property and that the property was not placed in service E. holding that the penalty was inapplicable when the deficiency was not due to overstated basis but to a failure to place property into service

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that overvaluation penalty did not apply where the taxpayers conceded other grounds of adjustment in the notice of deficiency including that they lacked a profit objective that the property at issue was not qualifying property and that the property was not placed in service
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: building of one inference upon another.” Beale v. Hardy, 769 F.2d 213, 214 (4th Cir.1985). Moreover, the existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the nonmoving party’s position is insufficient. Anderson, 477 U.S. at 252, 106 S.Ct. 2505. Rather, the evidence must be such that the fact-finder reasonably could find for the nonmoving party. Id. 1. Disability Discrimination The Rehabilitation Act provides that “[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States ... shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination ... under any program or activity conducted by any Executive agency.” 29 U.S.C. § 794(a). The act imposes upon agencies an oblig 982 (D.N.C.2000) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, "when the major life activity at Options: A. holding that breathing is a major life activity within the contemplation of the ada B. holding that restrictions that plaintiff not lift more than twentyfive pounds or bend repetitively are not evidence of a permanent impairment that substantially limits any major life activity C. holding that reproduction is not a major life activity D. recognizing sleeping as major life activity E. holding that restrictions on bending stooping and squatting do not significantly restrict a major life activity

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that restrictions on bending stooping and squatting do not significantly restrict a major life activity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Receipt by the Administrative Agent of a copy of (i) the annual consolidated financial statements (including balance sheets, income statements and cash flow statements) of the Guarantor and its Subsidiaries for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014, audited by independent public accountants of recognized national standing, (ii) the consolidated balance sheet and income statement of the Guarantor and its Subsidiaries for the Fiscal Quarter ended September 30, 2015, together with the related consolidated statement of income for such Fiscal Quarter and a year to date statement of cash flows, (iii) a pro forma balance sheet of the Borrower as of the Closing Date, giving effect to the transactions contemplated by this Loan Agreement and the San Juan Loan Agreement, and (iv) such other financial information regarding the Borrower and the Guarantor as the Administrative Agent may reasonably request.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the “release of this type of information about private individuals without [their written consent] would disclose their connection with the FBI’s investigation of plaintiff and others,” and, in turn, “could subject these individuals to harassment or criticism and focus derogatory inferences and suspicion on them.” Id. The EOUSA, too, withholds the names of third parties who appear in their records, including individuals who' appear to be co-co als mentioned in law enforcement file 552 (6th Cir.2001) (concluding that the agency properly withheld “identifying information on agents, personnel, and third parties after balancing the privacy interests against public disclosure”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1134, 122 S.Ct. 1077, 151 L.Ed.2d 978 (2002); Safe-Card Servs., Inc., 926 F.2d at 1206 (<HOLDING>). c. Exemption 7(D) Exemption 7(D) protects Options: A. holding that names of private individuals appearing in files within the ambit of exemption 7c are categorically exempt from disclosure unless disclosing such information is necessary in order to confirm or refute compelling evidence that the agency is engaged in illegal activity B. holding that exemption 7c protects the privacy interests of all persons mentioned in law enforcement records whether they be investigators suspects witnesses or informants and their names are generally exempt from disclosure C. holding that names and address of private individuals appearing in files within the ambit of exemption 7c are exempt from disclosure D. holding that exemption 7c protects the privacy interests of all persons mentioned in law enforcement records whether they be investigators suspects witnesses or informants and their names are generally exempt from disclosure E. holding the governments prior disclosure of requested information could not waive individuals privacy interests under exemption 6 and collecting cases involving exemption 7c

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that names and address of private individuals appearing in files within the ambit of exemption 7c are exempt from disclosure
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any amendment to this Agreement is required to give effect to any addition of Incremental Commitments or Loan made pursuant thereto in accordance with this Section 2.15 , then such amendment shall be effective if executed by the Loan Parties, each Lender providing such Incremental Commitments and the Administrative Agent (each such amendment is a “ Commitment Increase Amendment ”).

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: actual content of [Hamas social media posts]. They do not claim that [Defendants’] ads (which are themselves third-party content) are objectionable, or that the ads played any role in making [Hamas’s content] unlawful. For example, Plaintiffs do not allege that any ads paired with [Hamas]-related content offered tools or instructions on how to cany out [Hamas’s] threats, or otherwise encouraged individuals to commit acts of terrorism. The [First Amended Complaint] contains [four] screenshot example[s] of an alleged targeted ad next to [a Hamas] video on YouTube.... [FAC ¶¶42, 96,] Plaintiffs do not make any allegations about the relationship between [the products advertised ] and terrorism. See, e.g., Jones [v. Dirty World Entm’t Recordings LLC, 755 F.3d 398, 416-17 (6th Cir. 2014)] (<HOLDING>). See Gonzalez, 282 F.Supp.3d 1150 at 1168-69, Options: A. holding that defamatory comments negatively affecting the plaintiffs business did not support a substantive due process claim B. holding that a supervisors repeated comments to an employee that the supervisor wanted to have sex with the employees fifteenyearold daughter were extremely severe because the comments were significantly more offensive than the typical crass comments we have found to be insufficient to constitute harassment in other cases C. holding interactive service provider was not information content provider as to allegedly defamatory third party posts even though provider appended his own comments to the posts the plaintiff did not allege that the providers comments were themselves defamatory D. holding that a town manager did not act under color of state law when making allegedly defamatory statements about the plaintiff E. holding that in order to raise prejudicial comments of trial court on appeal defendant must object to comments when made and move for a mistrial

assistant: The best answer is C. holding interactive service provider was not information content provider as to allegedly defamatory third party posts even though provider appended his own comments to the posts the plaintiff did not allege that the providers comments were themselves defamatory
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: courts have exonerated individuals post-conviction have been single assailant DNA cases). 6 . Cherrix’s confession does not preclude a person's actual innocence of a crime. See Bruce M. Lyons, New Committee Looks at DNA and the Death Penalty, Crim.Jusx, Spring 2000, at 1 (reporting that, among May 16, 2000) (affirming its order for release of the habeas petitioner after DNA evidence showed he was actually of the murder); People v. Dabbs, 154 Misc.2d 671, 675-76, 587 N.Y.S.2d 90 (1991) (ordering post-conviction DNA testing and vacating conviction based on DNA evidence test results in a rape case). 10 . The need to prevent a miscarriage of miscarriage will be explored more fully below. See infra section IV. 11 . See also Commonwealth v. Reese, 444 Pa.Super. 38, 663 A.2d 206, 207 (1995) (<HOLDING>); State v. Hicks, 195 Wis.2d 620, 536 N.W.2d Options: A. holding that a new trial was warranted and stating that the defendant was entitled to have dna testing done on vaginal swabs taken from the victim B. holding that dna test results warranted a new trial of a postconviction petitioner who was convicted of rape and kidnaping C. recognizing that enhancement for results obtained may be warranted D. recognizing that in prior decisions the court had used the term inconclusive to mean that dna evidence did not exclude an individual but clarifying that in the future the term inconclusive would be used only when a dna sample does not contain enough dna to draw a conclusion dna is degraded or for other reasons a dna test yields no results or the examiner draws no conclusion E. holding that there is no postconviction due process right to biological evidence for purposes of dna testing

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that dna test results warranted a new trial of a postconviction petitioner who was convicted of rape and kidnaping
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in making the parallel determination of whether a police officer has the authority to open a vehicle door as part of issuing an order to exit the vehicle. In the realm of defining reasonable searches and seizures, no meaningful or relevant difference exists between the grant of authority to order an occupant of a vehicle to exit the vehicle and the authority to open the door as part of issuing that lawful order. Plain logic demands that the principles that govern whether a passenger of a vehicle lawfully can be ordered out of the vehicle must apply with equal force to whether a police officer is entitled, as a corollary and reasonable safety measure, to open the door as part of issuing a proper order to exit. See State v. Matthews, 330 N.J.Super. 1, 6, 748 A.2d 1125 (App.Div.2000) (<HOLDING>); State v. Conquest, 243 N.J.Super. 528, 533, Options: A. holding that the defendant was entitled to counsel when the offense for which he was tried could result in the imposition of a jail sentence B. holding that since the officer was entitled to order defendant out of the car he was equally entitled to open the door to accomplish that object C. recognizing that trial court properly left the door open for defendant to prove its defenses to the fed complaint D. holding that a secured creditor is not entitled to receive any more than that to which it was entitled pursuant to the terms of the confirmed plan E. holding a car was broken into or entered when defendant reached in through the open window of a car

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that since the officer was entitled to order defendant out of the car he was equally entitled to open the door to accomplish that object
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Pledge Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without giving effect to principles of conflict of law (excluding Section 5-1401 and 5-1402 of the New York General Obligations law).

assistant: Applicable Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: by introducing evidence concerning a potential defense that he never raised. Relevance, after all, must “be determined in relation to the charges and claims being tried, rather than in the context of defenses which might have been raised but were not.” United States v. Hedgepeth, 418 F.3d 411, 419 (4th Cir.2005). If the defendant wants to present a theory or belief that might have justified his actions, then he must present evidence that he in fact relied on that theory or belief. See, e.g., United States v. Kokenis, 662 F.3d 919, 927 (7th Cir.2011) (“[The defendant] offered no evidence that he actually relied on the pooling capital theory, so testimony about the theory would be irrelevant, confusing, and perhaps even misleading.”); cf. Havee v. Belk, 775 F.2d 1209, 1225 (4th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>). Otherwise, a defendant could introduce Options: A. holding that transferees failed to satisfy element of defense where they were aware of debtors financial problems at the time of transfer had lent money to debtor prior to transfer and not all money had been repaid B. holding that account summary could not be used to prove the knowledge of debtor and transferees where record contained no evidence that debtor or transferees saw the summary C. holding that an answer that asserts a counterclaim against a plaintiff who then becomes a bankruptcy debtor is an action or proceeding against the debtor within the meaning of 362a1 notwithstanding the fact that the debtor initiated the lawsuit D. holding debtor could include property because the bank accepted payments directly from the debtor and had previously allowed the debtor to cure default E. holding debtor could cure after the debtor had previously made payments to the bank

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that account summary could not be used to prove the knowledge of debtor and transferees where record contained no evidence that debtor or transferees saw the summary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in the criminal proceedings despite the provision in rule 198.3 that her answers could “not be used against [her] in any other proceeding.” And it cannot be determined whether the trial court properly applied the law of privilege as to each individual request for which Ferguson asserted her Fifth Amendment privilege. Accordingly, I would hold that Ferguson has not presented us with a record that is adequate to support the issuance of a writ of mandamus. In sum, it cannot be concluded that the trial court acted in an arbitrary or unreasonable manner in overruling Ferguson’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege and ordering her to. respond to Ber-nal’s requests for admissions. See, e.g., In re Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 187 S.W.3d 197, 198-99 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2006, orig. proceeding) (<HOLDING>); see also In re Le, 335 S.W.3d 808, 813-14 Options: A. holding that district court had not abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend complaint B. holding that trial courts limited findings were insufficient to allow determination of whether trial court abused its discretion in denying defendants motion to dismiss his indictment on constitutional speedy trial grounds C. holding that appellate court should overturn a district courts denial of a motion to amend a complaint only if the district court has abused its discretion D. holding that the issue was more appropriately framed as whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the evidence at trial E. holding that appellate court could not determine whether trial court abused its discretion in denying relators motion to compel the other party to produce documents because it could only speculate whether there was evidence to support the trial courts denial

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that appellate court could not determine whether trial court abused its discretion in denying relators motion to compel the other party to produce documents because it could only speculate whether there was evidence to support the trial courts denial
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: are governed by different limitation periods," the savings clause of § 100 will "extend the time for the commencement of an action predicated on those theories that would have been timely pressed had they been actually raised in the original suit." Chandler v. Denton, 1987 OK 38, ¶ 1, 741 P.2d 855, 859. Oklahoma courts have also recognized that § 100 may save a claim against defendants who were not named as parties until after limita tions ran; however, such cases have been generally limited to situations where the change or addition of a party is nominal or where the party added is substantially the same as the defendant who was originally named. Nusbaum v. Knobbe, 2001 OK CIV APP 52, ¶ 13, 23 P.3d 302, 304; see also Clark v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 1984 OK CIV APP 6, 677 P.2d 1092 (<HOLDING>). 14 In this case, Plaintiff argues that his Options: A. holding that while an original bankruptcy proceeding where the state is not named as a defendant is not a suit an adversary proceeding directly against the state would be B. holding that evidence of the same name and that the former conviction was in same city and same court as the present case and the fact that the defendant did not offer any testimony to rebut the prima facie evidence of identity was sufficient to establish identity C. holding that a refiled action against a new defendant entity was saved by 100 where there was an identity of interest between the original and later named defendant entities D. holding that since defendant failed to timely remove the original complaint which was removable based on federal question jurisdiction defendant thereby waived its right to file a subsequent removal even though the complaint was amended to add a new federal claim where the amendment to the complaint did not change the nature of the action so as to constitute a substantially new suit since the new allegations and claims were not substantially different from those in the original complaint E. holding the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it may find the defendant guilty if the jury found the defendant had conspired with the two coconspirators named in the indictment or both of them or others where evidence tended to show a conspiracy between the defendant and some person other than the named coconspirators

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a refiled action against a new defendant entity was saved by 100 where there was an identity of interest between the original and later named defendant entities