flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you are required to inform the host of any medical or physical conditions , or other circumstances that may impact your and any additional guest 's ability to safely participate in any experience , event or other host service .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in response to the notice. See "Withdrawal of Proposed Modification or Revocation of Ruling Letters Relating to Tariff Classification of Bell-Shaped and Similarly Shaped Glassware,” 32 Customs Bulletin at 13 (July 15, 1998); Pl.’s Reply Brief at 21. 11 . The parties bicker over the extent to which Customs’ classifications of the merchandise here at issue are entitled to a statutory presumption of correctness. See Pl.’s Brief at 6, 7-8, 9-10; Def.’s Brief at 5-6, 7-8, 9, 13-14; 28 U.S.C. § 2639(a)(1). What both parties generally fail to recognize is that the presumption of correctness is irrelevant at the summary judgment stage, where—by definition—there is assertedly no dispute as to any material fact. See, e.g., Goodman Mfg., L.P. v. United States, 69 F.3d 505, 508 (Fed.Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); see generally Universal Elec., Inc. v. United Options: A. holding that where no factual dispute is raised no hearing is required B. holding that agency decisions enjoy a presumption of correctness C. holding evidence insufficient to overcome presumption of correctness D. holding that because there was no factual dispute between the parties the presumption of correctness is not relevant E. holding that appellate review of hearsay issues is de novo with no presumption of correctness

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that because there was no factual dispute between the parties the presumption of correctness is not relevant
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Buyer shall have received evidence, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to it, that such licenses, permits, consents, approvals, authorizations, qualifications and orders of governmental authorities and other third parties as necessary in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby have been obtained.

assistant: Consents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any bills, statements, notices, demands, requests, consents or other communications given or required to be given under this Consent shall be effective only if rendered or given in writing and (i) delivered personally (against a signed receipt), (ii) sent by mail (registered or certified, return receipt requested), or (iii) sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier; delivered to the respective party at the address hereinabove set forth or at such other address for such purpose by notice in accordance with the provisions hereof; or, if addressed to Tenant or Subtenant, at the Building. Any such bills, statements, notices, demands, requests, consents or other communications shall be deemed to have been rendered or given (x) on the date delivered, if delivered personally, or (y) three (3) business days after the date mailed, if mailed, or (z) on the first (1 st ) business day after the date sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier, if sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and its investments. In the case at bar, the members of Subclass A performed duties they believed were imposed upon them as a result of proceedings that had been conducted in conformity with the law. Unlike the Caviness financial statements, the TranSouth notices presented the inherent threat of further legal process to collect debts. Further, it may be concluded that the deficiency judgments caused consumers to acquiesce to the churning scheme. Finally, Caviness was not a case seeking to proceed under Rule 23. As other courts discussed and this Court noted earlier, special concerns are raised under Rule 23 that must also be weighed. Often reliance is a matter that is demonstrated inferentially and by circumstantial proof. Cf. Cook v. Hayden, 183 Va. 203, 209, 31 S.E.2d 625 (1944) (<HOLDING>). The proof of reliance in the instant case may Options: A. holding that mcdonnell douglas framework which is used in title vii cases applies to ada cases when only circumstantial evidence of discrimination is offered B. holding that under ohio law fraud claim failed because there was no evidence of reliance C. holding that direct evidence of a fact is not necessary and that circumstantial evidence is not only sufficient but may also be more certain satisfying and persuasive D. holding in analyzing reliance under common law fraud that circumstantial evidence is not only sufficient but in most cases is the only proof that can be adduced E. recognizing that circumstantial evidence alone can be sufficient to demonstrate a defendants guilt

assistant: The best answer is D. holding in analyzing reliance under common law fraud that circumstantial evidence is not only sufficient but in most cases is the only proof that can be adduced
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and may not be modified, amended or otherwise changed in any manner except by a written instrument executed by the Parties hereto.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: 2.1 in order to download and/or use the software , products and/or skype websites you must first accept these terms.these terms are accepted by you ( a ) when you click to accept or agree to the terms ; or ( b ) when you download and/or use the software , products and/or skype websites .

assistant: Contract by using
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Id. As an initial matter, we emphasize that Wilson’s challenge is to the scope of his seizure during the traffic stop, not to the search of the truck. In order to bring a direct challe nger’s conversation with Wilson, resulting in the disclosure of the bucket and its contents, did not extend the duration of the stop beyond the time required for these field sobriety tests. Thus, Wilson’s sole contention is that when Deputy Eichinger asked to look under the vest covering the bucket between Wilson’s feet, he unreasonably expanded the scope of Wilson’s detention beyond that permitted based on either a routine traffic violation or a reasonable suspicion that VanHouden was driving under the influence of alcohol. We agree that Deputy Eichinger’s request to see beneath the vest th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); Jones, 44 F.3d at 872 (holding an officer Options: A. holding that notwithstanding the officers testimony that he had no suspicion of criminality the officer was aware of facts that would give rise to reasonable suspicion in the mind of a reasonable officer B. holding an officer could ask for consent to search the trunk of a car where he had reasonable suspicion that the driver had crossed the border illegally and could be transporting illegal aliens C. holding that an officer had probable cause to search bags in the trunk of the car when he opened the trunk and smelled a strong odor of methamphetamine D. holding that it was objectively reasonable for the police to conclude that the general consent to search the respondents car included consent to search a bag within that car E. holding that the driver of a car who had permission to use the car had standing to challenge its search

assistant: The best answer is B. holding an officer could ask for consent to search the trunk of a car where he had reasonable suspicion that the driver had crossed the border illegally and could be transporting illegal aliens
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: seeking a preliminary injunction must show the injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be adequately compensated by damages. Shoe Show. Consultants argue there is no threat of immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be compensated by money damages because OPFM is defunct, no Wrap Mortgages are being sold, and the pecuniary damages Consumers sustained are already fixed. See W. Penn Specialty MSO, Inc. v. Nolan, 737 A.2d 295 (Pa.Super.1999) (an injury is regarded as “irreparable” if it will cause damages that can be estimated only by conjecture and not by an accurate pecuniary standard). As noted, the Commonwealth asserts a violation of statutory law constitutes irreparable injury. See Pub. Util. Comm'n v. Israel, 356 Pa. 400, 52 A.2d 317 (1947) (<HOLDING>). In particular, where the Commonwealth cred Options: A. holding that a determination of irreparable harm is unnecessary where the legislature prohibited certain conduct B. holding that the district court erred when it failed to consider the presumption of irreparable harm C. holding the time trouble and expense of an unnecessary trial is not irreparable harm when determining whether the threshold elements of certiorari jurisdiction have been met D. holding that a party who can show a significant risk of irreparable harm has demonstrated that the harm is not speculative E. holding that the threat of irreparable harm must be immediate

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a determination of irreparable harm is unnecessary where the legislature prohibited certain conduct
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of Holdings , Safari (solely to the extent on or after the Collateral and Guarantee Release Date) and the Borrower will, and will cause each Restricted Subsidiary to, do or cause to be done all things necessary to obtain, preserve, renew and keep in full force and effect its legal existence and the rights, licenses, permits, privileges, franchises, the Intellectual Property material to the conduct of its business, in each case (other than the preservation of the existence of Holdings , Safari (solely to the extent on or after the Collateral and Guarantee Release Date) and the Borrower Parties) to the extent that the failure to do so could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; provided that the foregoing shall not prohibit any merger, consolidation, liquidation or dissolution permitted under Section 6.03 or any Disposition permitted by Section 6.05.

assistant: Existence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: process considerations here bear on the deprivation of liberty, lending more than a passing similarity. Courts have drawn on the Barker model to analyze due process issues arising from delayed hearings in civil proceedings. See United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($8,850) in U.S. Currency, 461 U.S. 555, 564, 103 S. Ct. 2005, 76 L. Ed. 2d 143 (1983); People v. Litmon, 162 Cal. App. 4th 383, 395-406, 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 122 (2008) (applying the Barker factors in a due process claim involving undue delay in commencing a civil commitment proceeding); Morel v. Wilkins, 84 So. 3d 226, 246 (Fla. 2012) (assuming Barker test applied to a claim of delay in a civil commitment proceeding and deciding case on diat basis); In re Lamb, 368 Mass. 491, 500, 334 N.E.2d 28 (1975) (<HOLDING>). In Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty Options: A. recognizing massachusetts doctrine that solid default of appearance constitutes a deemed waiver of the right to jury trial B. holding trial court did not err in failing to conduct a hearing on motion for reinstatement when appellants failed to call to the trial courts attention the need for a hearing C. holding abuse of discretion is the proper standard for reviewing award of attorney fees in patent cases although questions of law may in some cases be relevant D. holding that a state was embraced within the meaning of the word person where the word person was defined as meaning and including a partnership association company or corporation as well as a natural person E. recognizing speedy trial cases including barker as relevant to timeliness of commitment hearing under massachusetts law for sexually dangerous person

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing speedy trial cases including barker as relevant to timeliness of commitment hearing under massachusetts law for sexually dangerous person
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Purchase Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The execution of this Purchase Agreement may be by actual or facsimile signature.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to the provisions of Section 2.20 (which shall be controlling with respect to the matters covered thereby), in the event that any Lender (which term shall include the Issuing Bank for purposes of this Section 2.19 ) shall determine (which determination shall, absent manifest error, be final and conclusive and binding upon all parties hereto) that any Change in Law: (i) subjects such Lender (or its applicable lending office) to any additional Tax (other than any Tax on the overall net income of such Lender) with respect to this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents or any of its obligations hereunder or thereunder or any payments to such Lender (or its applicable lending office) of principal, interest, fees or any other amount payable hereunder; (ii) imposes, modifies or holds applicable any reserve (including any marginal, emergency, supplemental, special or other reserve), special deposit, compulsory loan, FDIC insurance or similar requirement against assets held by, or deposits or other liabilities in or for the account of, or advances or loans by, or other credit extended by, or any other acquisition of funds by, any office of such Lender (other than any such reserve or other requirements with respect to Eurodollar Rate Loans that are reflected in the definition of Adjusted Eurodollar Rate); or (iii) imposes any other condition (other than with respect to a Tax matter) on or affecting such Lender (or its applicable lending office) or its obligations hereunder or the London interbank market; and the result of any of the foregoing is to increase the cost to such Lender of agreeing to make, making or maintaining Loans hereunder or acquiring participations in, issuing or maintaining Letters of Credit hereunder or to reduce any amount received or receivable by such Lender (or its applicable lending office) with respect thereto; then, in any such case, the Borrower shall promptly pay to such Lender, upon receipt of the statement referred to in the next sentence, such additional amount or amounts (in the form of an increased rate of, or a different method of calculating, interest or otherwise as such Lender in its sole discretion shall determine) as may be necessary to compensate such Lender for any such increased cost or reduction in amounts received or receivable hereunder. Such Lender shall deliver to the Borrower (with a copy to the Administrative Agent) a written statement, setting forth in reasonable detail the basis for calculating the additional amounts owed to such Lender under this Section 2.19(a) , which statement shall be conclusive and binding upon all parties hereto absent manifest error.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 4. In the event that the Receiving Party or any of its Representatives are requested or required by applicable Federal or State law of the United States to disclose any of the Confidential Information, it is agreed that the Receiving Party or its Representative, as the case may be, will provide the Furnishing Party with prompt notice of such request(s) so that it may seek an appropriate protective order or other appropriate remedy and/or waive compliance by the Receiving Party or its Representative with the provisions of the Agreement.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: order regarding post-conviction DNA testing in any case in which the death penalty is not imposed. Id. art. 64.05; Reger v. State, 222 S.W.3d 510, 513 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, pet. ref'd). Hiatt states police reports reflect D.H. wiped his mouth with a tissue after allegedly performing oral sex on Hiatt to the point of ejaculation. He claims the tissue will rebut the allegations of sexual abuse because it will not contain any of his DNA. Although the record shows Hiatt filed his motion for DNA testing in conjunction with his second motion for new trial, the trial court has yet to rule on Hiatt’s request for DNA testing. Thus, the trial court has not made an appealable finding as to the DNA issue. Cf. Cravin v. State, 95 S.W.3d 506, 508 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>); In re Johnston, 79 S.W.3d 195, 198 Options: A. recognizing ruling on motion for judgment of acquittal is reviewed de novo on appeal B. holding an interlocutory appeal is allowed from the trial courts written order denying a motion to dismiss under the tcpa C. holding that a ground for relief not pled in a motion for postconviction relief is waived and cannot be raised on appeal D. holding a written order is required for an appeal from a convicting courts ruling on a postconviction motion for dna testing E. recognizing that an order for dna testing could cause irreparable harm because the test is intrusive and any error in improperly ordering genetic testing cannot be remedied on appeal after the testing is done and the results are released

assistant: The best answer is D. holding a written order is required for an appeal from a convicting courts ruling on a postconviction motion for dna testing
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: a live controversy. As explained below, we agree with Allstate’s first contention, but reject its second and third arguments. A. Complete Relief Pacleb argues the judgment Allstate has consented to would not afford him complete relief on his individual claims for damages and injunctive relief, because Allstate has neither admitted liability nor offered sufficiently broad injunctive relief. We disagree. 1. Admission of Liability Pacleb contends Allstate has not agreed to complete relief because the judgment it has consented to would not include an admission of liability. Because his complaint alleges Allstate violated the TCPA, he maintains he “has an interest in a finding of liability by a court, or an admission of liability from Allstate, on those legal allegations. (2d Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). 2. Scope of Injunctive Relief Pacleb Options: A. holding that a title vii retaliation claim was not properly before the court because although the plaintiff had not been fired when he filed his complaint the plaintiff never amended his complaint to include a claim of retaliation based on his termination B. holding that the right to counsel in probation revocation proceedings is not absolute where the defendant has been convicted of or has admitted to committing a crime C. holding a plaintiff is not entitled to keep litigating his claim simply because the defendant has not admitted liability D. holding that when plaintiff has proven injury but has failed to prove the amount of damages the plaintiff is only entitled to nominal damages E. holding if the plea agreement was not conditioned on the sentencing guidelines an appellant is not entitled to relief because his sentence is not illegal

assistant: The best answer is C. holding a plaintiff is not entitled to keep litigating his claim simply because the defendant has not admitted liability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and answers from Muhammad’s interview, she did have such recollection at the time the report was prepared and that the report accurately reflected Muhammad’s statements at that time. Contrary to Muhammad’s contentions, therefore, Agent Denny’s testimony stemmed from her personal knowledge and not from the FBI 302. Based on these facts, we find no error in the admission of Agent Denny’s testimony regarding Muhammad’s post-arrest statements. Second, Muhammad had no legal basis to compel the Government to produce Agent Gandolfo’s original interview notes that were subsequently incorporated into the FBI 302. A defendant is not entitled to an agent’s notes if the agent’s report contains all that was in the original notes. See United States v. Batchelder, 581 F.2d 626, 635 (7th Cir.1978) (<HOLDING>), rev’d on other grounds, 442 U.S. 114, 99 Options: A. holding that the government did not violate the jenks act by failing to produce an agents handwritten notes which were discarded after being typed into a summary B. holding that once government inducement is shown the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant was disposed to commit the criminal act prior to first being approached by government agents C. holding that an fbi agents notes were not a witness statement within the act because there was no evidence that the witness adopted or approved what was recorded D. holding that agents rough notes were not statements under the jencks act where notes were scattered and all the information contained in them was available to the defendant in other forms E. holding that district court did not err in concluding after an evidentiary hearing that the immunity agreement between defendant and the government did not extend to the charge being prosecuted

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the government did not violate the jenks act by failing to produce an agents handwritten notes which were discarded after being typed into a summary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The proceeds of the Tranche B-5 Term Loans shall be used to finance the Transaction Costs, and, to the extent any proceeds remain after such application, for general corporate purposes permitted by the Credit Agreement.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) Time and Distribution of Payments . Altria shall make each payment hereunder, without set-off or counterclaim, not later than 11:00 A.M. (New York City time) on the day when due to the Administrative Agent at the Administrative Agent’s Account in same day funds. The Administrative Agent will promptly thereafter cause to be distributed like funds relating to the payment of principal or interest or commitment fees ratably (other than amounts payable pursuant to Section 2.11, 2.14 or 8.04(b)) to the Lenders for the account of their respective Applicable Lending Offices, and like funds relating to the payment of any other amount payable to any Lender to such Lender for the account of its Applicable Lending Office, in each case to be applied in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. From and after the effective date of an Assignment and Acceptance pursuant to Section 8.07, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments hereunder in respect of the interest assigned thereby to the Lender assignee thereunder, and the parties to such Assignment and Acceptance shall make all appropriate adjustments in such payments for periods prior to such effective date directly between themselves.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: terminate your account or your access to the service , for any reason , or where it determined that you have breached any of the terms of this agreement or of the privacy policy .

assistant: Content removal, Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.” Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 225, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973). In making this inquiry, a court is not concerned with the issue of whether the substance of the confession is true. See Rogers v. Richmond, 365 U.S. 534, 544, 81 S.Ct. 735, 5 L.Ed.2d 760 (1961) (expressly disapproving of judging the admissibility of a confession under the United States Constitution by utilizing a standard which considers the probable truth or falsity of the confession and instead emphasizing that the question of admissibility is “a question to be answered with complete disregard of whether or not [the defendant] in fact spoke the truth.”); Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 377, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964) (<HOLDING>); Commonwealth v. Bracey, 501 Pa. 356, 365, 461 Options: A. holding state must prove voluntariness of confession beyond a reasonable doubt B. holding that question of whether a confession was coerced was not to be resolved by considering the truth or falsity of the confession C. holding that under elstad the first question that must be answered when determining whether a subsequent confession is tainted by an earlier confession is whether the initial confession was obtained in violation of the defendants fifth amendment rights ie whether it was involuntary or whether the confession was voluntary but obtained in technical violation of miranda D. holding the determination of the voluntariness of a confession is a determination uninfluenced by the truth or falsity of the confession E. holding that trial judges determination of the admissibility of a confession is based on whether the confession was voluntarily given

assistant: The best answer is D. holding the determination of the voluntariness of a confession is a determination uninfluenced by the truth or falsity of the confession
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If a claim, dispute, or controversy arises between any of the parties with respect to this Agreement, related agreements, (all of the foregoing, a “Dispute”), and only if a jury trial waiver is not permitted by applicable law or ruling by a court, any party may require that the Dispute be resolved by binding arbitration before a single arbitrator at the request of any party. By agreeing to arbitrate a Dispute, each party is giving up any right it may have to a jury trial, as well as other rights it would have in court that are not available or are more limited in arbitration, such as the rights to discovery and to appeal.

assistant: Arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: state prosecutors would be able to usurp federal prosecutorial discretion. Nor did the state prosecutor in this case have any authority to bind the federal prosecutor. Under settled precedent, one federal prosecutor cannot bind his or her counterpart in another district unless he or she has been given the authority. See United States v.. D’Apice, 664 F.2d 75, 78 (5th Cir. Unit B Dec.1981). If federal prosecutors cannot bind other federal prosecutors with their unauthorized acts, a state prosecutor a fortiori should not be able to do so. Roberson, 872 F.2d at 611. Here, Kozak has not demonstrated that the state actors, Meyer and Moser, with whom her counsel conferred had been granted actual federal authority to negotiate a cooperation agreement. The absence of an agency re Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, because Kozak has failed to Options: A. holding that a promise by fbi agents that defendant would serve no time on state charges if he cooperated in the federal investigation was unauthorized B. holding that an fbi agents investigation of the written contents of a notebook that was lawfully in the possession of the fbi constituted a search that violated the defendants fourth amendment rights C. holding that defendant was not entitled to specific performance of alleged cooperation agreement entered into with fbi agent who allegedly promised defendant he would not be prosecuted if he cooperated in making a statement where there was no evidence establishing that agent was authorized to make promises to obtain defendants cooperation D. holding that the speedy trial clock for state charges did not begin to run when the defendant was taken into custody by federal authorities on federal charges but rather when he was indicted for the state charges E. holding that fbi agents testimony regarding witnesss pri or identification was admissible where nothing in the record suggested that the declarant was unavailable for reexamination after the agents testimony

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a promise by fbi agents that defendant would serve no time on state charges if he cooperated in the federal investigation was unauthorized
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As of the Closing Date, all written or formally presented information, including any Information Memorandum, other than any projections and information of a general economic or general industry nature, furnished by or on behalf of, Parent or any Subsidiary to the Administrative Agent, any of its Affiliates or any Lender pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement or any other Loan Document, taken as a whole together with all other written information so delivered on or prior to the Closing Date, together with all information contained in regular or periodic reports filed by or on behalf of Parent or the Borrowers with the SEC or any similar Governmental Authority on or prior to such date is complete and correct in all material respects and does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein not materially misleading in light of the circumstances under which such statements are made; provided that, with respect to forecasts or projected financial information, Parent and each Borrower represents only that such information was prepared in good faith based upon assumptions believed by it to be reasonable at the time so furnished (it being understood by the Administrative Agent and the Lenders that any such projections are subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of Parent or its Subsidiaries, that no assurances can be given that such projections will be realized and that actual results may differ materially from such projections).

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: employed by American at Logan, seven skycaps were employed by G2 at Logan, one skycap had formerly been employed by G2 at Logan, and one skycap was employed by American in St. Louis, Missouri. 2 . The district court permitted only seven of the nine Logan skycaps to pursue both theo fies at trial. During discovery, two skycaps asserted their privilege against self-incrimination to withhold their tax records; those two skycaps were precluded from presenting evidence of damages that would have been required to make out a claim for tortious interference. The district court also made clear to the jury that no duplicative recovery would be permitted for skycaps who prevailed on both theories. 3 . See Brown v. United Air Lines, Inc., 656 F.Supp.2d 244, 249-51 (D.Mass.2009) (Gertner, J.) (<HOLDING>); Travers v. JetBlue Airways Corp., No. Options: A. holding tips law preempted B. holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law C. holding the state law claims were not preempted D. holding that state law claim regarding breach of settlement agreement was preempted by federal labor law E. holding misrepresentation claim to be preempted

assistant: The best answer is A. holding tips law preempted
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No ERISA Event has occurred or is reasonably expected to occur that, when taken together with all other such ERISA Events for which liability is reasonably expected to occur, would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. The excess of the present value of all accumulated benefit obligations under each Plan (based on assumptions used for purposes of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87), if any, over the fair market value of the assets of such Plan, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Erisa
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No investigation, action or proceeding is pending and, to SNH’s knowledge, no action or proceeding is threatened and no investigation looking toward such an action or proceeding has begun, in respect of SNH or any of its subsidiaries which questions the validity of any of the Transaction Documents or any action taken or to be taken pursuant thereto that would have a material adverse effect on any SNH Party or impair or delay the consummation of any of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice to be given under the terms of this Award Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the Company at its principal office to the attention of the Secretary, and to the Holder at the Holder’s last address reflected on the Company’s payroll records. Any notice shall be delivered in person or shall be enclosed in a properly sealed envelope, addressed as aforesaid, registered or certified, and deposited (postage and registry or certification fee prepaid) in a post office or branch post office regularly maintained by the United States Government. Any such notice shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date which it is personally delivered or, whether actually received or not, on the third business day after mailing in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Paragraph 10.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to Section 8 and Section 9 of this Agreement, if Indemnitee at any time was or is or becomes a party to, witness in, or participant in, or is threatened to be made a party to, witness in, or participant in, any Claim or Claims by reason of or arising in whole or in part out of any Indemnifiable Event, including, without limitation, any Claims brought by or in the right of the Company, Claims brought by third parties, and Claims in which the Indemnitee is solely a witness, the Company shall indemnify Indemnitee, and hold Indemnitee harmless, from and against any and all Losses incurred by Indemnitee as a result of, or otherwise in connection with, such Claim or Claims, in each and any case to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by the laws of the State of Colorado. For the avoidance of doubt, “the fullest extent authorized or permitted by the laws of the State of Colorado” shall include, but not be limited to: (i) the fullest extent authorized or permitted by the Colorado Business Corporation Act (the “ Act ” ) as in effect on the date hereof; and (ii) the fullest extent authorized or permitted by any amendments to or replacements of the Act adopted after the date of this Agreement and any change in judicial interpretation of the Act which occurs after the date of this Agreement, in each case, that increases the extent to which a corporation may indemnify its non-director officers; provided that no change in the Act, by way of amendment, replacement, judicial interpretation, or otherwise, shall have the effect of reducing the benefits available to the Indemnitee hereunder under Colorado Law as in effect on the date hereof or as such benefits may subsequently be increased as a result of any amendment, replacement, judicial interpretation, or other change.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the term of this Agreement, and for a period of one (1) year after the Expiration Date, Manager shall maintain in strict confidence all information he has obtained or shall obtain from the Company which the Company has designated as "confidential" or which is, by its nature confidential, relating to the Company's business, operations, properties, assets, services, condition (financial or otherwise), liabilities, employee relations, customers (including customer usage statistics), suppliers, prospects, technology, or trade secrets, except to the extent such information (i) is in the public domain through no act or omission of the Company, (ii) is required to be disclosed by law or a valid order by a court or other governmental body, or (iii) is independently learned by Manager outside of this relationship (the " Confidential Information ").

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the Term, you will receive a base salary at the rate of $525,000 per annum (“ Base Salary ”), paid in accordance with Company’s ordinary payroll practices. Your normal place of work will be in the Company’s Cambridge, Massachusetts office.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Assignor and Assignee each represent and warrant to the other party: (a) the execution, delivery and performance of this Assignment have been duly approved by such party and no further action is required on the part of such party to execute, deliver and perform this Assignment; (b) the person(s) executing this Assignment on behalf of such party have all requisite authority to execute and deliver this Assignment; and (c) this Assignment, as executed and delivered by such person(s), is valid, legal and binding on such party, and is enforceable against such party in accordance with its terms.

assistant: Authority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: his FMLA rights. To do so, Periy would have to show (i) that he exercised an FMLA protected right; (ii) that he suffered an adverse employment action; and (iii) that there is a causal connection between the first two elements. See, e.g., Nichols v. Ashland Hosp. Corp., 251 F.3d 496 (4th Cir.2001). 4 . Additionally, American points to no specific prejudice it would suffer if Perry’s motion for leave to amend is granted. Its conclusory statements regarding prejudice are insufficient to bar Perry's motion for leave to amend. See, e.g., Spell v. McDaniel, 591 F.Supp. 1090, 1098 (E.D.N.C.1984) (generalized statements that defendant would suffer prejudice if leave to amend were granted deemed insufficient). 5 . See also In re Lease Oil Antitrust Litigation, 200 F.3d 317, 321 (5th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); Restatement (Second) of Judgments, § 25 cmt. Options: A. holding state immune from suit brought in state court B. holding that a federal court litigant who is forced into state court under pullman may reserve a right to return to federal court in that the plaintiff can preserve the right to the federal forum for federal claims by informing the state court of his or her intention to return following litigation of the state claims in the state court C. holding that state court judgment settling shareholders state and federal claims had preclusive effect in federal court even though shareholders could not have pressed their federal claims in state court D. holding that earlier state court litigation did not bar assertion of antitrust claims in a later federal suit since the antitrust claims could not have been brought in state court E. holding that even though 24 only refers to actions in state court it applies to state claims brought in federal court

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that earlier state court litigation did not bar assertion of antitrust claims in a later federal suit since the antitrust claims could not have been brought in state court
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: By entering into this Agreement, no Party in any way implies that it is waiving any property rights it has in its Trademarks or any other intellectual property belonging to it or its Affiliates, including but not limited to rights accruing by virtue of applicable federal, state, or common law protections for copyright, patent, trade secret, trademark and/or service mark rights. In the event any Party discovers a violation of such proprietary rights, that Party, for itself and on behalf of its Affiliates, expressly reserves the right to seek in an appropriate state or federal court all available remedies for the infringement of such rights.

assistant: No Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you assume the cost of all telephone and internet access charges along with all necessary equipment , servicing , repair or correction incurred in maintaining connectivity to world of warcraft 's servers .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No representation, warranty, or statement made by Purchaser in this Agreement or in any Exhibit to this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement or omits or will omit any fact necessary to make the statements contained herein or therein not misleading. Purchaser has disclosed to Seller all facts that are material to the financial condition, operation, or prospects of the Business, and the Assets.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: ( 5 ) buy or sell for `` real '' money or exchange gold , weapons , armor , or any other virtual items that may be used in world of warcraft outside the world of warcraft platform ;

assistant: None