flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Nevertheless, on this premise, Defendant urges us to extend application of the “single-larceny doctrine” to the offense of possession of a stolen vehicle under Section 30-16D-4(A). The single-larceny doctrine provides that “the stealing of property from different owners at the same time and the same place constitutes only one larceny.” State v. Brown, 1992-NMCA-028, ¶ 6, 113 N.M. 631, 830 P.2d 183. “[T]he doctrine is a canon of construction used when the Legislature’s intent regarding multiple punishments is ambiguous.” State v. Alvarez-Lopez, 2004-NMSC-030, ¶ 43, 136 N.M. 309, 98 P.3d 699. {21} We decline to extend the single-larceny doctrine to this case. Even though our courts have recognized the validity of the single-larceny doctrine, see Brown, 1992-NMCA-028, ¶¶ 6, 13 (<HOLDING>), we see no indication that the doctrine Options: A. recognizing the validity of the doctrine but holding no equitable tolling on the facts presented B. recognizing doctrine C. recognizing that new mexico courts will enforce a contractual choiceoflaw provision unless to do so would violate fundamental principle of justice or deeprooted traditions of new mexico D. holding that defendants could be convicted of bribery in new mexico even though the actual transaction occurred in texas since defendants attempted to obstruct justice in new mexico E. recognizing the validity of the singlelarceny doctrine in new mexico

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing the validity of the singlelarceny doctrine in new mexico
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that the act's exemptions be construed narrowly. See Brouillet, at 793. We also reject the trial court's suggested construction. Although the trial court did give the exemption a narrow interpretation, the trial court's interpretation brings RCW 42.17.310(1)(j) into conflict with our court rules establishing the work product rule. The protection of the work product rule is triggered prior to the official initiation of litigation and extends beyond the official termination of litigation. See Heidebrink v. Moriwaki, 104 Wn.2d 392, 400, 706 P.2d 212 (1985) (explaining that the work product rule attaches to documents prepared prior to trial when the specific parties involved have expectations that litigation will occur); Pappas v. Holloway, 114 Wn.2d 198, 210, 787 P.2d 30 (1990) (<HOLDING>); Dever v. Fowler, 63 Wn. App. 35, 47, 816 P.2d Options: A. holding that opinion work product is entitled to nearly absolute protection with limited exceptions B. holding that the burden of proof lies on the party asserting the protection of the work product doctrine C. holding that the party asserting work product protection has the burden of establishing that the doctrine applies D. holding work product protection waived where company shared litigation strategy against plaintiff with nonparty independent contractor E. holding that the protection of the work product rule continues after litigation has terminated

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the protection of the work product rule continues after litigation has terminated
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The partnership representative within the meaning of Section 6223(a) of the Code, and the tax matters partner within the meaning of Section 6231(a)(7) of the Code prior to the amendment by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the “ Pre-Amendment Code ”), shall be, in each case, the Manager or the Manager’s designee (the “ Tax Matters Member ”). The Tax Matters Member shall have all of the rights, authority and power, and shall be subject to all of the obligations, as applicable, of a tax matters partner to the extent provided in the Pre-Amendment Code and the Regulations relating to the Pre-Amendment Code, and of a partnership representative to the extent provided in the Code and Regulations. The Tax Matters Member shall take such action as may be reasonably necessary to cause each other eligible Member to become a “notice partner” within the meaning of Section 6231(a)(8) of the Pre-Amendment Code. To the extent and in the manner provided by applicable Code sections and Regulations thereunder, the Tax Matters Member (i) shall furnish the name, address, profits interest and taxpayer identification number of each Member to the IRS and (ii) shall keep the Members informed of all administrative and judicial proceedings for the adjustment of Company items required to be taken into account by a Member for income tax purposes. The Tax Matters Member shall notify the other Members within forty-five (45) Business Days after it receives notice from the IRS (or any state and local tax authority), of any administrative proceeding with respect to an examination of, or proposed adjustment to, any Company tax items.

assistant: Powers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be modified, only by a written instrument signed by the parties. This Agreement shall not amend or affect any written employee benefit plan of the Company, and Goodwin’s benefits, if any, under such plans shall be governed by the terms of each plan in which Goodwin is or was a participant. No failure or delay by the Company in exercising any right or remedy under this Agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right or remedy preclude any other right or further exercise of any other right or remedy. The recitals and any defined terms therein are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement.

assistant: Miscellaneous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Special Needs Trusts to shelter their monthly Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) income from certain Medicaid eligibility determinations. Wong asserts that the district dourt erred in accepting defendants’ reliance on SMM 3259.7 in calculating his benefits because the rule conflicts with the express language of 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d), the provision of the Medicaid Act that sets forth Medicaid eligibility rules for trusts created with an individual’s assets. We reject Wong’s reading of § 1396p(d) and instead conclude that Congress did not speak to the question presented by Wong’s claim. We apply Skidmore deference to SMM 3259.7, which was issued by the agency to fill the gap left by Congress. See Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140, 65 S.Ct. 161, 89 L.Ed. 124 (1944) (<HOLDING>). We conclude that SMM 3259.7 is an appropriate Options: A. holding that the scope and application of state exemptions are defined by the state courts and that we are bound by their interpretations B. holding that courts should not question the validity of particular litigants interpretations of their creeds C. holding that an agencys rulings interpretations and opinions of an act administered by the agency while not controlling upon the courts by reason of their authority do constitute a body of experience and informed judgment to which courts and litigants may properly resort for guidance D. holding that deference to an agency interpretation is not appropriate where a statute is administered by more than one agency E. recognizing that we give considerable weight to an agencys interpretations and applications of statutory or regulatory provisions that are administered by the agency

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that an agencys rulings interpretations and opinions of an act administered by the agency while not controlling upon the courts by reason of their authority do constitute a body of experience and informed judgment to which courts and litigants may properly resort for guidance
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Employee shall be entitled to twenty (20) days of vacation per calendar year (January 1 through December 31) in accordance with the policies that the Board periodically establishes for certain senior management employees of the Bank, which shall comply with any applicable federal or state laws or policies. Employee’s days of vacation shall be prorated in the first and final calendar years of this Employment Agreement. Vacations shall be scheduled in a reasonable manner approved by the CEO. The Employee shall not be entitled to receive any additional compensation from the Bank on account of his failure to take a vacation nor shall he be entitled to accumulate unused vacation from one fiscal year to the next, except to the extent authorized by the Board.

assistant: Vacations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: voluntary dismissal or withdrawal of inflated claims may justify a fee reduction, the same will not be true of claims pursued in good faith, but later withdrawn for valid reasons, such as the discovery of additional evidence.” Green, 361 F.3d at 100; see also Morgenstern v. Cty. of Nassau, No. CV 04-58 (ARL), 2009 WL 5103158, at *10 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2009) (“The court will not, however, deduct from the award the amounts incurred for legal services rendered in connection with the breach of contract, civil service law, or human rights law claims that were voluntarily dismissed ... [because] [t]he court agrees with the plaintiff that the work done in relation to those claims contributed to the ultimate success of the lawsuit .... (citing Grant v. Martinez, 973 F.2d 96, 99 (2d Cir. 1992) (<HOLDING>))). There is nothing in the record that Options: A. holding that the relevant inquiry is not whether hindsight vindicates an attorneys time expenditures but whether at the time the work was performed a reasonable attorney would have engaged in similar time expenditures B. holding that the relevant time of inquiry is the date of the filing of the complaint C. holding that the relevant time is the time of the employment decision D. holding that where the law is unsettled at the time of trial but settled by the time of appeal the plainness of the error should be judged by the law at the time of appeal E. recognizing that the necessary inquiry is not whether there was a warrant or whether there was time to get one but whether there was probable cause for the arrest

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the relevant inquiry is not whether hindsight vindicates an attorneys time expenditures but whether at the time the work was performed a reasonable attorney would have engaged in similar time expenditures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice necessary under th e Agreement should be addressed to the Company in care of its Vice President – Compensation and Benefits at the principal executive office of the Company and to the Participant at the address appearing in the personnel records of the Company for the Participant or to either party at such other address as either party may hereafter designate in writing to the other. Any such notice will be deemed effective upon receipt thereof by the addressee.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Unless waived in writing by the Company, the requirements of this Section 2(g) shall be satisfied only if, prior to the sixtieth (60 th ) day following the date of termination of the Employee’s employment under Section 2(e) or 2(f), (i) the Employee executes a release (“Release”) by the Employee of all claims, known or unknown, arising on or before the date of the Release against the Company and its officers, directors and employees in the form and manner prescribed by the Company and provided to the Employee (which Release may include cooperation, nondisclosure and confidentiality covenants), and (ii) any applicable period during which the Employee can revoke his or her execution of the Release expires without the Employee revoking such execution. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the requirements of this Section 2(g) (if not waived in writing by the Company) shall be satisfied only if the Employee executes the Release within any time period required under the terms of the Release.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: his sentence. Hanson advised appellate counsel that he would like to contest the application of § 4B1.4 to his case, which resulted in a higher offense level and longer sentence because Hanson was classified as an armed career criminal. Hanson forfeited this objection by not raising it in the district court, and so we would review the court’s determination only for plain error. United States v. Williams, 258 F.3d 669, 672 (7th Cir.2001). We could find no error here, plain or otherwise, because Harris has two convictions for burglary, and convictions for sexual intercourse without consent and for escape. Counsel is correct that these convictions qualify as violent felonies under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). See Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Brown, 273 F.3d 747, 750 Options: A. holding a burglary must be of a building or structure in order to qualify as a violent felony for acca purposes B. holding that attempted burglary as defined by florida law is a violent felony under acca C. holding that burglary is violent felony D. holding that escape from secure custody is a violent felony E. holding that coerced sex is violent felony

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that burglary is violent felony
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Committee to consider formulating a rule governing the length of original writ petitions. Id. at 519 n. 1. In response to the Court’s request, the committee proposes amendments to rule 9.100(g), (j), and (k), which limit the length of petitions and responses to fifty pages and the length of replies to fifteen pages. The proposed amendments were published for comments. Only one comment was received, which supports page limitations but suggests that the rule be amended to specifically provide for longer filings upon a showing of good cause. The rules committee considered the need for a provision specifically allowing the court to permit longer filings, but a majority believed that such authority is inherent and need not be specifically stated in the rule. See Basse, 740 So.2d at 520 (<HOLDING>). After reviewing the proposed amendments and Options: A. holding filing of motion for reconsideration does not toll the 30day deadline for filing petition for review B. holding that claimant must show good cause for failure to submit evidence to alj and appeals council C. recognizing petitioners must be afforded the opportunity to show good cause for filing a longer petition D. holding that utility customers mailing of a petition did not constitute the filing of the petition as filing was not effectuated until the petition was received by the clerk E. holding that pleading captioned petition for rule to show cause implies that proceedings will be civil because a criminal defendant can never be compelled to show cause

assistant: The best answer is C. recognizing petitioners must be afforded the opportunity to show good cause for filing a longer petition
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: is posted on the property and mailed to the debtor in accordance with Md. Rule 14-209, regardless of whether it yet was received. See Md. Rule 14-209(b). Plaintiff acknowledges that he was served and that an affidavit of service was filed. Am. Compl. ¶ 17. The affidavit states that notice was posted on May 27, 2012 and sent by certified mail on May 29, 2012. Id. In neither his Amended Complaint nor his Opposition to SBA’s Motion to Dismiss does Plaintiff challenge the sufficiency of the affidavit or of service of the foreclosure complaint. Therefore, service was complete on May 29, 2012, more than one.year before Plaintiff commenced this action, without regard to whether Plaintiff had received the notice yet. See Md. Rule 14-209(b); Dow v. Jones, 232 F.Supp.2d 491, 497 (D.Md.2002) (<HOLDING>). Consequently, Plaintiffs FDCPA claim must be Options: A. holding that service was presumed valid where the defendant did not demonstrate a rule violation even where the affidavit contained a technical error B. holding that violation of rule 16 in that case was not harmless error C. holding the burden is on the defendant to demonstrate the error satisfies each prong of the plain error test D. holding that where the appellant has failed to demonstrate error the court is not required to search the record for an error E. holding that a defendant must demonstrate that he would not have pled guilty but for the error

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that service was presumed valid where the defendant did not demonstrate a rule violation even where the affidavit contained a technical error
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: course. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). 2 . The "Amendment by Interlineation” stated, in part: "Due to defendants' stated intent to continue contesting their violation of Baltimore City Code Article 4, § 3-1(1), Shilling will withdraw this statutory basis for Count VIII (Age Discrimination) of his Amended Complaint and instead substitute 29 USCS (sic) § 623 as the statutory basis for his age discrimination claim.” (See Docket No. 30.) It then provided the language of the revised Count VIII. (See id.) 3 . Although Plaintiff did not state in his motion whether he was seeking dismissal with or without prejudice, his later filings clarify that he is willing to dismiss his claim with prejudice. (See Docket No. 52, at 3.) 4 . See Whitfield v. Federal Crop Ins. Corp., 557 F.2d 413, 414 (4th Cir.1977) (<HOLDING>); Bahari v. Countrywide Home Loans, 2005 WL Options: A. holding that where concurrent jurisdiction exists claim may be removed unless congress states otherwise B. recognizing there can be concurrent proximate causes of accident C. holding that federal jurisdiction over rico claims is concurrent and not exclusive D. holding that federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over 1983 claims E. recognizing that the states have a cognizableinterest in whether congress may direct or otherwise motivate the states to regulate in a particular field or a particular way

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that where concurrent jurisdiction exists claim may be removed unless congress states otherwise
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: The data provided to MDHHS will be used only for purposes of the Michigan Trauma Registry, consistent with Part 209 of the Public Health Code and the Michigan Administrative Code R 325.125 through 325.138. 1. Use and disclose the data only in accordance with this Agreement, or as otherwise authorized by law; 4. Use appropriate safeguards to prevent the use or disclosure of the information other than as provided by this Agreement;

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Int’l, Inc., 223 F.R.D. 471, 477 (S.D.Ohio 2004) (“Before delving into the ‘rigorous analysis’ required by Rule 23, a court first should consider whether a precisely defined class exists and whether the named plaintiffs are members of the proposed class”). At a minimum, the description must be “sufficiently definite that it is administratively feasible for the court to determine whether a particular individual is a member.” 7A Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller, & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 1760, at 120-21 (2d ed.1986). As this Court discussed in Brockman, courts have rejected proposed classes where plaintiffs failed to “identify any logical reason ... for drawing the boundaries where they did.” Daigle v. Shell Oil Co., 133 F.R.D. 600, 602-03 (D.Colo.1990) (<HOLDING>). Usually, scientific or objective evidence Options: A. holding that a class could not be certified because the definition made class members impossible to identify prior to individualized factfinding and litigation and thereby failed to satisfy one of the basic requirements for a class action under rule 23 B. holding that when defendant failed to appear at scheduled suppression hearing the court could have decided the motion in defendants absence but it did not have the authority to refuse to consider it C. holding that the defendants oral promise to appear was insufficient to amount to a required appearance within the meaning of the failure to appear statute D. holding that treating a defendants failure to appear as a waiver not only of the right to be present but of the right to have a hearing on the motion was error E. holding that plaintiffs had failed to identify a class where the proposed boundaries did not appear to relatte to the defendants activities but were instead arbitrarily drawn lines on a map

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that plaintiffs had failed to identify a class where the proposed boundaries did not appear to relatte to the defendants activities but were instead arbitrarily drawn lines on a map
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the prosecutor and testified be fore the grand jury, must be considered a complaining witness, or, at the very least, an actor that conspired with a complaining witness. The question here, then, is whether a complaining witness who knowingly provides false information on which a prosecutor relies, or a defendant who conspires with one who does, is, nonetheless, entitled to at least qualified immunity. In view of the general purpose of the qualified immunity doctrine, the question almost answers itself. As the Supreme Court noted in Malley, qualified immunity does not protect those who “knowingly violate the law,” Malley, 475 U.S. at 341, 106 S.Ct. at 1096, and “[t]he right to be free from ... prosecution in t ed by Richardson confirm this result. See 521 U.S. at 404, 117 S.Ct. at 2104(<HOLDING>). With respect to common law tradition, in Options: A. holding that defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity B. holding that court must look both to history and to the purposes that underlie government employee immunityto determine whether qualified immunity is available in given context C. holding that a court must only look to the statutory definition not the underlying circumstances of the crime to determine whether a given offense is by its nature a crime of violence for purposes of 18 usc 16 D. holding that the court evaluating a claim of qualified immunity must first determine whether the plaintiff states a claim of a constitutional violation at all and then must determine whether the claimed right was clearly established before proceeding to the qualified immunity question E. holding that private psychiatric facility that had been involved in emergency involuntary detention and treatment of arrestee pursuant to state court order was entitled to assert qualified immunity in light of policy considerations that underlie doctrine

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that court must look both to history and to the purposes that underlie government employee immunityto determine whether qualified immunity is available in given context
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “makes it an unlawful employment practice to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s ... sex.” See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l); see also Harris v. Forklift, 510 U.S. 17, 20, 114 S.Ct. 367, 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993). The Supreme Court has interpreted the phrase terms, conditions or privileges of employment broadly, and has stated that it encompasses Congress’ intent to “strike at the entire spectrum of disparate treatment of men and women in employment, which includes requiring people to work in a discriminatory hostile or abusive environment.” Harris, 510 U.S. at 20, 114 S.Ct. 367; see also Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 753-754, 118 S.Ct. 2257, 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998) (<HOLDING>). That is, Title VII is violated whenever “the Options: A. holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive B. holding that a hostile work environment is a form of discrimination that is actionable under the statute C. recognizing hostile work environment discrimination in ada context D. recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983 E. recognizing that a claim of hostile environment sex discrimination is actionable under title vii

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a hostile work environment is a form of discrimination that is actionable under the statute
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower will, and will cause each Subsidiary to, use the proceeds of the Credit Extensions for domestic working capital purposes. The Borrower will not, nor will it permit any Subsidiary to, use any of the proceeds of the Advances to purchase or carry any “margin stock” (as defined in Regulation U). No Borrower will request any Loan, and no Borrower shall use, and the Borrower shall ensure that its Subsidiaries and its or their respective directors, officers, employees and agents shall not use, the proceeds of any Loan (i) in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment or giving of money, or anything else of value, to any Person in violation of any Anti-Corruption Laws, (ii) in any manner that would result in the violation of any applicable Sanctions, or (iii) in any manner that would cause the Loan to be deemed a “liquidity facility” as such term is used in 12 C.F.R. Part 50.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (See Odom Dep. at 75-76.) Other than her expert’s opinion as to the communication that occurred in the one incident involving Harvey, Harvey points to no evidence to support a finding that the County knew its training on the subject of communication created an unjustifiable risk to citizens and that the County ignored that risk. See Mateyko, 924 F.2d at 826. Indeed, Harvey offers no evidence concerning the County’s training, or lack thereof, on this subject. Without more, Harvey cannot establish a policy based on evidence of a lack of communication between Deputy Perez and others present at the time Perez decided to detain Harvey. A plaintiff cannot establish the existence of a policy based on a single incident. See Meehan v. County of Los Angeles, 856 F.2d 102, 107 (9th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the County is entitled to Options: A. recognizing county officers as those whose general authority and jurisdiction are confined within the limits of the county in which they are appointed who are appointed in and for a particular county and whose duties apply only to that county and through whom the county performs its usual political functions B. holding where court could not see how defendants prior assaults established motive to commit charged murder admission of prior assaults was abuse of discretion C. holding that when two penetrations were separated by a short period of time two independent assaults occurred D. holding that probation department employees are not county employees E. holding evidence that county employees engaged in unconstitutional assaults on two occasions insufficient to support finding such assaults were pursuant to county policy

assistant: The best answer is E. holding evidence that county employees engaged in unconstitutional assaults on two occasions insufficient to support finding such assaults were pursuant to county policy
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: specifically , you agree that you shall not -- directly or indirectly -- sell , export , reexport , transfer , divert , or otherwise dispose of any products , software , or technology ( including products derived from or based on such technology ) received from spotify under the agreements to any destination , entity , or person prohibited by any applicable laws or regulations of the united states or any other jurisdiction without obtaining prior authorization from the competent government authorities as required by those laws and regulations .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you should refer back to the offer describing the services as ( i ) you may not receive a refund at the time of cancellation ; ( ii ) you may be obligated to pay cancellation charges ; ( iii ) you may be obligated to pay all charges made to your billing account for the services before the date of cancellation ; or ( iv ) you may lose access to and use of your account when you cancel the services .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: carefully guard against dilution of the principle that guilt is to be established by probative evidence and beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” Smith, 718 F.2d at 1276 (quoting Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 503, 96 S.Ct. 1691, 1693, 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976)). The reasonable doubt instruction in this case, viewed in the context of the charge as a whole, diluted this burden by creating a standard that “could mislead [the members of the court-martial] into finding no reasonable doubt when in fact there was some.” Holland, 348 U.S. at 140, 75 S.Ct. at 138. The strongest language in the charge that might serve to correct this impression, that stating that “[p]roof beyond a reasonable doubt means proof to a moral certainty,” see United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1347-48 (10th Cir.1973) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936, 94 S.Ct. 1934, 40 Options: A. holding when ordinance language is clear courts must give language its plain meaning B. holding that the court did not abuse its discretion by tracking the statutory language in the instruction C. holding that instructions are sufficient which substantially follow the language of the statute or use equivalent language D. holding that when language is exactly the same in two statutory provisions the meaning of that language is also identical E. holding that moral certainty language compensated for willing to act language in an otherwise proper reasonable doubt instruction

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that moral certainty language compensated for willing to act language in an otherwise proper reasonable doubt instruction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: we grant you a personal , limited , revocable , non-exclusive , non-sublicensable , and non-transferable license to access and use our services , including to use masks provided via the services , subject to and in accordance with our terms and policies .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as provided in the written benefit plans and programs referenced in Section 2.3(c) and Section 2.3(d) , this Agreement embodies the complete agreement and understanding among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and preempts any prior understandings, agreements or representations by or among the parties, written or oral, which may have related to the employment of the Key Employee or the subject matter hereof in any way.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the law of the State of New York without regard to any principle of conflicts of law that could require the application of the law of any other jurisdiction.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All obligations under Sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 and 8.6 shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement and shall expire [**] following termination or expiration of this Agreement.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: years after the fatal accident. Nevertheless, the State urges that Kifer's "positive acts" of, among other things, altering and selling his car, "tolled the statute of limitations] because they concealed the fact of Kifer's crime[.]" Brief of Appellee at 5. Contrary to the State's contention, however, Kifer's alteration and disposal of his car did not amount to concealment of the fact that a crime had been committed but was only concealment of his guilt. It is well settled that concealment of guilt is not concealment of the fact that an offense has been committed. See Robinson v. State, 57 Ind. 113, 114 (1877) (interpreting predecessor statute); State v. Holmes, 181 Ind.App. 634, 637, 398 N.E.2d 242, 244 (1979) (interpreting predecessor statute); see also Umfleet, 556 N.E.2d at 342 (<HOLDING>). To constitute concealment of evidence of the Options: A. holding that defendants denial of involvement in alleged child abuse not positive act to conceal fact that offense had been committed B. holding that a defendants sentence is controlled by the law in effect at the time he committed the offense C. holding that denial of untimely request was not abuse of discretion D. holding denial of continuance to be an abuse of discretion E. holding that duress is unavailable to defendants charged with the strict liability offense of child abuse

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that defendants denial of involvement in alleged child abuse not positive act to conceal fact that offense had been committed
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: ebay will send any notice to you to the physical address we have on file associated with your ebay account ; it is your responsibility to keep your physical address up to date .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that “the claimed solution is necessarily rooted in computer technology in order to overcome a problem specifically arising in the realm of computer networks.” Id. Hence, DDR and Bascom stand for the principle that when claims relating to an abstract idea address a specific Internet-centric problem and do not unduly preempt other solutions to that problem, they likely satisfy the “inventive concept” requirement embodied by step two of the Alice/Mayo test. Id. at 1259. The line between computer-centric problems and commonplace business problems is often blurred in the context of Internet commerce. Nonetheless, courts have definitively stated that an otherwise abstract idea is not rendered patent-eligible by reciting general purpose technological components. Alice, 134 S.Ct. at 2357 (<HOLDING>); see also Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, 772 Options: A. holding that by its terms the idea does not require exhaustion where the relief sought is unavailable in an administrative proceeding under the idea monetary damages are not available so exhaustion is not required B. holding that damages are not relief that is available under the idea C. holding that the introduction of a computer into the claims does not render the idea patenteligible D. recognizing that idea is simply not an antidiscrimination statute so that pure discrimination claim was not barred by parents failure to exhaust remedies under idea E. holding that wellunderstood routine conventional activities are insufficient to transform an abstract idea into a patenteligible application

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the introduction of a computer into the claims does not render the idea patenteligible
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the Law of the State of New York, not taking into account any rules of conflicts of laws that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Voting Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall automatically terminate upon the earliest to occur of (a) such time as the Merger Agreement shall have been validly terminated pursuant to its terms, (b) the Effective Time, (c) the Termination Date and (d) such time as the Merger Agreement is amended to change the form or reduce the amount of Merger Consideration to be paid pursuant thereto (such earliest time, the “ Expiration Time ”); provided , however , that the provisions of Article V shall survive any termination of this Voting Agreement.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Party will use all reasonable good faith efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary or reasonably desirable under applicable law to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Parties agree (i) to furnish upon request to each other such further information, (ii) to execute and deliver to each other such other documents, and (iii) to do such other acts and things, all as any other Party may reasonably request for the purpose of carrying out the intent of this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to applicable law, Executive will be provided indemnification but on terms no less favorable than provided to any other Company executive officer and subject to the terms of any separate written indemnification agreement as well as the Company’s charter.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 28 (2d Cir.1991). A. The Civil Rights Claims Legal Aid argues that plaintiffs allegations concerning the violation of his civil rights by Legal Aid should be dismissed on the ground that Legal Aid has not acted under color of state law, as required to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In order to survive a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff pleading a claim under § 1983 need allege only that “some person acting under color of state law deprived the claimant of a federal right.” Green v. Maraio, 722 F.2d 1013, 1016 (2d Cir.1983) (citing Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635, 100 S.Ct. 1920, 64 L.Ed.2d 572 (1980)). Legal Aid is correct, as far as it goes, that the Second Circuit expressly has ruled that Legal Aid is not a state actor. Lefcourt v. Legal Aid Soc., 445 F.2d 1150, 1157 (2d Cir.1971) (<HOLDING>); Housand v. Heiman, 594 F.2d 923, 924-25 (2d Options: A. holding that although legal aid provides services for indigent criminal defendants which governmental agencies otherwise might have to assume it is a private institution in no manner under state or city supervision or control B. holding that state action is present when the state exercises coercive power over is entwined in the management or control of or provides significant encouragement either overt or covert to a private actor C. holding that new york city agencies cannot be sued D. holding that there is no private right of action against a state governmental entity for violations of the texas constitution E. recognizing that state agencies which are independent of the state are citizens of the state

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that although legal aid provides services for indigent criminal defendants which governmental agencies otherwise might have to assume it is a private institution in no manner under state or city supervision or control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement is personal in nature and neither of the parties hereto shall, without the written consent of the other, assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement or its obligations, duties and rights under this Agreement; provided, however, that in the event of the merger, consolidation, transfer or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, this Agreement shall, subject to the provisions hereof, be binding upon and inure to the benefit of such successor and such successor shall discharge and perform all of the promises, covenants, duties and obligations of the Company hereunder.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No event or circumstance has occurred or exists that constitutes a Default or Event of Default. Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is in default, and no event or circumstance has occurred or exists that with the passage of time or giving of notice would constitute a default, under any Material Contract.

assistant: No Defaults
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and the “execution of parole revocation procedures,” tasks integrally related to an official’s decision to grant or revoke parole. Anderson, 714 F.2d at 909. We have also explained, however, that parole officials are not “entitled to absolute immunity for conduct not requiring the exercise of quasi-judicial discretion.” Id. “There is no reason to clothe actions taken outside an official’s adjudicatory role with the absolute immunity tailored to the demands of that role.” Id. Thus, while parole officials “may claim absolute immunity for those actions relating to their responsibility to determine whether to revoke parole, their immunity for conduct arising from their duty to supervise parolees is qualified.” Id. at 910; see also Sepulveda v. Ramirez, 967 F.2d 1413, 1415-16 (9th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). Anderson, therefore, expresses the broad Options: A. holding that defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity B. holding that defendant is entitled to qualified immunity because plaintiff failed to allege the violation of a clearly established constitutional right C. holding that in determining whether a state officer is entitled to qualified immunity for 1983 purposes courts may not consider whether the constitutional right was clearly established before determining first that a constitutional right was violated D. holding that in deciding whether officers are entitled to qualified immunity it is not only the evidence of clearly established law that is for the court but also whether a reasonable officer could have believed that his or her conduct was lawful in light of the information the officer had E. holding that a parole officer was not entitled to qualified immunity for depriving a woman of her clearly established due process right to bodily privacy by entering a bathroom stall and watching her urinate

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a parole officer was not entitled to qualified immunity for depriving a woman of her clearly established due process right to bodily privacy by entering a bathroom stall and watching her urinate