flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither the Company or any of its Affiliates, nor any director, officer or employee of the Company or its Affiliates shall be responsible or liable in any manner to any Participant, Beneficiary or any person claiming through them for any benefit or action taken or omitted in connection with the granting of benefits, the continuation of benefits, or the interpretation and administration of Plan. Service on the Committee or as an Administrator shall constitute service as a director or officer of the Company so that the Committee and Administrator members shall be entitled to indemnification, limitation of liability and reimbursement of expenses with respect to their Committee or Administrator services to the same extent that they are entitled under the Company’s charter documents and applicable law for their services as directors or officers of the Company.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, the Plan and the employment agreement between the Company and the Participant (if any) constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto with regard to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement, the Plan and the employment agreement between the Company and the Participant (if any) supersede any other agreements, representations or understandings (whether oral or written and whether express or implied) that relate to the subject matter of this Agreement.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if viber believes , in its sole discretion , that a violation of these terms has occurred , it may edit or modify any submission , posting or emails , remove the material permanently , cancel postings , warn users , suspend users and passwords , terminate accounts , or take other corrective action it deems appropriate .

assistant: Content removal, Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the City in this case are not legally cognizable unless they are clearly waived by the TTCA See York, 871 S.W.2d at 177; Duhart v. State, 610 S.W.2d 740, 742 (Tex.1980). Plaintiff alleges assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress—both intentional torts under Texas law. The TTCA provides that a municipality cannot be liable for any claims “arising out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, or any intentional tort_” Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 101.057(2). A review of the summary judgment evidence submitted by Plaintiff reveals that his intentional tort allegations are not waived by the TTCA. Therefore, these claims are absolutely barred by sovereign immunity. See City of San Antonio v. Dunn, 796 S.W.2d 258, 261 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1990, writ denied)(<HOLDING>); Townsend v. Memorial Medical Center, 529 Options: A. holding that no waiver of municipal liability existed under the ttca where plaintiffs claims arose out of allegations of intentional torts including false arrest and excessive force B. holding no liability existed under the circumstances C. holding that excessive force claims are to be treated under the fourth amendment D. recognizing that the fourth amendment protects against the use of excessive force by police officers in carrying out an arrest E. holding that claims for false arrest and imprisonment under 1983 accrue at the time of the arrest

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that no waiver of municipal liability existed under the ttca where plaintiffs claims arose out of allegations of intentional torts including false arrest and excessive force
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and all other communications provided for in the Agreement shall be in writing and addressed (a) if to the Company, (i) at its principal office address or such other address as it may have designated by written notice to the Executive for purposes hereof, directed to the attention of the Board with a copy to the General Counsel of the Company or (ii) to the company electronic mail address of the General Counsel of the Company and (b) if to the Executive, (i) at the Executive’s residence address on the records of the Company or to such other address as the Executive may have designated to the Company in writing for purposes hereof or (ii) to the Executive’s company electronic mail address. Each such notice or other communication shall be deemed to have been duly given when (A) delivered or mailed by United States registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid or (B) when electronic evidence of electronic mail transmission is received, except that any notice of change of address shall be effective only upon receipt. During the 18-month period following any Termination Without Cause or Termination For Good Reason (that does not occur during the Change of Control Protection Period), the Executive shall provide notice to the Company within 3 business days of becoming employed by another employer.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of law that the videotape itself is not a judicial record to which the common law right of public access attaches. Appellants are incorrect to assume that this issue turns on whether or not the videotape itself was admitted into evidence and that, therefore, the litigants at trial have control to decide whether or not the public’s right may be exercised. See Brief for Appellants (Reporters) at 13 (“The defendants should not be permitted to circumvent the common law and constitutional rights to access by marking only the transcript of the videotaped deposition.”). Even if the defendants had moved for the admission of the videotape into evidence, the videotape itself would not necessarily have become a judicial record subject to public review. See, e.g., Nixon v. War 58 (2d Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>)). In Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc. and Options: A. holding that defendant is under an obligation to give the government notice of an alibi witness even if defendant is unable to locate the witness B. holding that absent extraordinary circumstances the press has a common law right to inspect and copy the videotape of depositions used at trial where the witness is unable to provide live testimony privacy interests of an ill witness were not sufficiently extraordinary to preclude press access C. holding that in order to state a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel based on the failure to call a witness to testify the claimant must allege 1 the identity of the potential witness 2 that the witness was available to testify at trial 3 the substance of the witnesss testimony and 4 an explanation of how the omission of the testimony prejudiced the case D. holding that promises made by the prosecution to a witness in exchange for that witness testimony relate directly to the credibility of the witness E. holding that closure was limited not only because it lasted only for the testimony of one witness but also because there was no limitation at all on the right of the public or the press to examine the transcript of the officers testimony

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that absent extraordinary circumstances the press has a common law right to inspect and copy the videotape of depositions used at trial where the witness is unable to provide live testimony privacy interests of an ill witness were not sufficiently extraordinary to preclude press access
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 1000 (8th Cir.2011) (alteration in original) (quoting Richmond v. Higgins, 435 F.3d 825, 828 (8th Cir.2006)). “A violation of the FDCPA is reviewed utilizing the unsophisticated-consumer standard which is ‘designed to protect consumers of below average sophistication or intelligence without having the standard tied to the very-last rung on the sophistication ladder.’ ” Strand v. Diversified Collection Serv., Inc., 380 F.3d 316, 317 (8th Cir.2004) (quoting Duffy v. Landberg, 215 F.3d 871, 874 (8th Cir.2000)). The FDCPA is a strict liability statute. See Picht v. John R. Hawks, Ltd., 236 F.3d 446, 451 (8th Cir.2001) (discussing the “strict liability imposed upon debt collectors by the FDCPA”); see also Clark v. Capital Credit & Collection Servs., Inc., 460 F.3d 1162, 1176 (9th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); Ross v. Vakulskas Law Firm, PC, No; Options: A. holding that the district court erred in finding violations that were not alleged specifically in the plaintiffs notice letter and no penalties could be imposed for those violations B. holding that violations of fdcpa need not be knowing or intentional C. holding that the jury need only decide the ultimate issue of intentional discrimination and usually need not make findings on the prima facie case or whether the defendants explanation is pretextual D. holding that individual defendants may not be held liable for violations under title vii E. holding that a 1983 cause of action lies where police officers as opposed to prosecutors engaged in an intentional coverup thereby depriving a person of the right to recover for constitutional violations

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that violations of fdcpa need not be knowing or intentional
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: deputy sheriff position under civil service and thereby limit the power of the sheriff to hire and fire deputies and regulate hours of employment and tours of duty. Consistent with Cross, he contends that sec. 59.21(8)(b), Stats., indicates that the sheriff cannot fire at will a deputy appointed under sec. 59.21(1), but must retain the deputy if the deputy exhibits good behavior. Such limit on the sheriffs power to dismiss, he maintains, exists regardless of whether the sheriffs present two-year term is complete. In fact, Heitkemper contends that because he is afforded civil service protection under sec. 59.21(8) and is a party to the collective bargaining agreement, he is not an at-will employee, see Vorwald v. School Dist. of River Falls, 167 Wis. 2d 549, 557, 482 N.W.2d 93 (1992) (<HOLDING>), but retains a property interest in his or her Options: A. holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union B. holding county employee with unenforceable contract was atwill employee C. holding that absent a law or collective bargaining agreement a municipal employee is an employee atwill D. holding that a union employee protected by a collective bargaining agreement was in no different position than an atwill employee and could similarly maintain an action for wrongful discharge for reporting workplace safety violations E. holding that an atwill employee may not be discharged for refusal to violate the law

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that absent a law or collective bargaining agreement a municipal employee is an employee atwill
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as expressly amended by this Transfer Agreement, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Transfer Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one instrument. Electronic signatures shall be considered binding.

assistant: Miscellaneous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: has reflected Western civilization concepts of the family as a unit with broad parental authority over minor children”); Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255, 98 S.Ct. 549, 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978) (noting that “[w]e have recognized on numerous occasions that the relationship between parent and child is constitutionally protected”); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 232, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972) (stating that “[t]he history and culture of Western civilization reflect a strong tradition of parental concern for the nurture and upbringing of their children” and “[t]his primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition”);; Fla. Dep’t of Children and Families v. F.L., 880 So.2d 602 (Fla.2004) (<HOLDING>); S.B. v. Department of Children & Families, Options: A. recognizing that noncustodial parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children B. recognizing parents fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children C. holding that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children D. recognizing that pjarents have a fundamental liberty interest protected by both the florida and federal constitutions in determining the care and upbringing of their children E. holding that a parents right to control a childs upbringing is a fundamental liberty interest under the fourteenth amendment

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing that pjarents have a fundamental liberty interest protected by both the florida and federal constitutions in determining the care and upbringing of their children
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: evaluate all of the qualifications of the nominees of the political parties and independent candidates for state offices prior to certifying such nominees and candidates to the probate judges pursuant to [§ 17-9-3, Ala.Code 1975]. If the Secretary of State has knowledge gained from an official source arising from the performance of duties prescribed by law, that a candidate has not met a certifying qualification, the Secretary of State should not certify the candidate.” (Emphasis added.) Rather, the Secretary of State contends that the task of ensuring a candidate’s qualifications is left to the leadership of that candidate’s respective political party, a less than ideal procedure for all challengers because of its partisan nature. See generally Knight v. Gray, 420 So.2d 247 (Ala.1982) (<HOLDING>). Courts in other states have tended to agree Options: A. holding party must support argument with legal authority B. holding that a court reporter had de facto authority and noting that the objection to the reporters qualifications was first made after the jury rendered its verdict C. holding that plaintiff had no authority or statutory right for actions proper course was to report actions to proper legal authority D. holding that third party seeking to be reimbursed for costs incurred in responding to discovery request had standing to appeal because its interests were directly represented by its own counsel in the trial court it was effectively bound by the trial courts final order of dismissal the other party would have had the right to appeal the trial courts ruling if it had granted the request for reimbursement and the third party had no other legal remedy to contest the trial courts denial of its request E. holding that the democratic party had the authority to hear preprimary challenges to the political or legal qualifications of its candidates

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the democratic party had the authority to hear preprimary challenges to the political or legal qualifications of its candidates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All federal, state, local and other tax returns required to have been filed with respect to each Loan Party and each Subsidiary of each Loan Party have been filed, and payment or adequate provision has been made for the payment of all federal, state, and other taxes, fees, assessments and other governmental charges which have become due and payable pursuant to said returns or to assessments received, except to the extent (i) that such taxes, fees, assessments and other charges are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted and for which adequate reserves or other appropriate provisions, if any, are being maintained in accordance with GAAP or (ii) to the extent that the failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: injures, interferes with, or intimidates the provider or recipient of reproductive health care or speech that amounts to a threat of force that obstructs, injures, intimidates, or interferes with the provider or recipient of reproductive health care. The regulation of neither the former conduct, nor the latter speech, is violative of the First Amendment. See Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476, 484, 113 S.Ct. 2194, 2199, 124 L.Ed.2d 436 (1993) (“[A] physical assault is not ... expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.”); R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minn., 505 U.S. 377, 388, 112 S.Ct. 2538, 2546, 120 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (noting that “threats of violence are outside the First Amendment”); New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 769-73, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 3361-63, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (1982) (<HOLDING>); Cameron v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 611, 616-17, 88 Options: A. holding new yorks disclosure law unconstitutionally overbroad B. holding portions of the online solicitation of a minor statute unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the first amendment C. holding the improper photography or visual recording statute unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the first amendment D. holding that washingtons harassment statute was unconstitutionally overbroad because it covered constitutionally protected speech E. holding that a statute must burden a substantial amount of protected speech to be unconstitutionally overbroad

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a statute must burden a substantial amount of protected speech to be unconstitutionally overbroad
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: do not, decide whether this approach should be followed if we were presented with a case where the petitioner provides evidence that a trial witness has recanted trial testimony and, in addition, offered a new version of the facts. The dissent’s conclusion that this case needs to be analyzed under Larrison and Rainer is premised on the dissent’s conclusion that “it is undisputed that Quantez was present at the commission of the murder” and that “his recantation testimony provides new eyewitness exculpatory testimony.” But Turnage has the burden on postconviction to set forth facts entitling him to the relief requested. We have said that to carry this burden petitioners must do more than offer concluso-ry, argumentative assertions, without factual support. See Rainer, 566 N.W.2d at 695 (<HOLDING>); see also Morrissey v. State, 286 Minn. 14, Options: A. holding that to prevail on a claim that an immigration hearing was procedurally insufficient the petitioner must demonstrate prejudice B. holding that an unsworn letter was insufficient to contest a claim of exemption C. holding violation of rule 23a does not entitle petitioner to habeas relief D. holding that an error must have a substantial and injurious effect on the verdict to entitle a petitioner to habeas relief E. holding that anonymous letter was insufficient to entitle petitioner to hearing

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that anonymous letter was insufficient to entitle petitioner to hearing
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you acknowledge that yahoo may or may not pre-screen content , but that yahoo and its designees shall have the right ( but not the obligation ) in their sole discretion to pre-screen , refuse , or remove any content that is available via the yahoo services .

assistant: Content removal
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice required by the terms of this Award Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be deemed to be effective upon personal delivery or upon deposit with the U.S. Postal Service, by registered or certified mail, with postage and fees prepaid. Notice shall be addressed to the Company at its principal executive office and to the Participant at the address that he or she most recently provided to the Company.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If the consideration proposed to be paid for the Transfer Stock is in property, services or other non-cash consideration, the fair market value of the consideration shall be as determined in good faith by the Company’s Board of Directors and as set forth in the Company Notice. If the Company or any Purchaser cannot for any reason pay for the Transfer Stock in the same form of non-cash consideration, the Company or such Purchaser may pay the cash value equivalent thereof, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and as set forth in the Company Notice. The closing of the purchase of Transfer Stock by the Company and the Purchasers shall take place, and all payments from the Company and the Purchasers shall have been delivered to the selling Transferring Purchaser, by the later of (i) the date specified in the Proposed Transfer Notice as the intended date of the Proposed Purchaser Transfer and (ii) forty-five (45) days after delivery of the Proposed Transfer Notice.

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: § 1512 — the criminal statute prohibiting tampering with a witness — and a criminal conspiracy in violation 18 U.S.C. § 371. Section 1512(b) specifically provides: Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to — (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; .... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. An “official proceeding,” as referred to in § 1512(b), is explicitly defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1515 to include a federal grand jury proceeding. Indeed, § 1512(b) applies to attempts to influence testimony in a broader range of proceedings than does t d Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). Plainly, by stating a claim under § 1985(2), Options: A. holding that witnesss testimony that he lied to investigators because his friend the defendant had asked him to do so was sufficient to sustain the defendants conviction under 1512b B. holding that uncorroborated testimony of one witness is sufficient by itself to sustain a conviction C. holding that the uncorroborated testimony of an informant may be sufficient to sustain a conviction D. holding that a defendant who was told several times he was not under arrest and who never asked to leave during an interview with investigators was not in custody E. holding witnesss testimony identifying appellant is sufficient standing alone to support conviction

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that witnesss testimony that he lied to investigators because his friend the defendant had asked him to do so was sufficient to sustain the defendants conviction under 1512b
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The headings contained in this Certificate are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Certificate. Any references to sections (§) in this Certificate shall be to sections (§) of this Certificate unless otherwise expressly stated as part of such reference.

assistant: Headings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. Id. at 2464. Importantly, Miller applies only to juvenile defendants, who were not at issue in Harmelin. Id. at 2470 (“Harmelin had nothing to do with children and did not purport to apply its holding to the sentencing of juvenile offenders.”). We therefore conclude that Miller did not alter Hcmne-lin as Lopez suggests; Lopez was not a juvenile at the time of the charged offense, so Harmelin — not Miller — is controlling. Accordingly we conclude that the Eighth Amendment is not violated by the imposition of a mandatory sentence of life, with the possibility of parole. See Harmelin, 501 U.S. at 994-95, 111 S.Ct. 2680. We overrule Lopez’s third and fourth issues. C. Due process guarantees In his fifth'a Ct. 1586, 1591, 29 L.Ed.2d 90 (1971) (<HOLDING>), to argue that it is appropriate to deviate Options: A. recognizing validity of retroactive license that memorialized grant of oral license B. holding motorist entitled to hearing before taking his license under statute that required loss of license if uninsured driver involved in an accident C. holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer D. holding governments repudiation of license gave patentee right to terminate license E. holding that a hit and run or unknown driver is deemed to be uninsured for purposes of the uninsured motorist statute

assistant: The best answer is B. holding motorist entitled to hearing before taking his license under statute that required loss of license if uninsured driver involved in an accident
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: he might have also attended other meetings where the Application was discussed, but he could not remember. After the Application was filed, D’Antonio and his staff assisted Applicant in drafting a public notice to be published in local newspapers pursuant to the statute. Once the notice was published, D’Antonio’s next contact with the Application was when he reviewed the findings and recommendations of the hearing examiner in his capacity as the State Engineer. Neither he nor any of his personnel assisted in drafting the Application. {70} Protestants rely on Reid and cite to other cases for the proposition that hearing officials like D’Antonio should be recused when there is an “appearance of bias.” See City of Albuquerque v. Chavez, 1997-NMCA-054, ¶¶ 15-16, 123 N.M. 428, 941 P.2d 509 (<HOLDING>); see also Reid, 1979-NMSC-005, ¶ 5 (holding Options: A. holding that a person is seized when a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave B. holding that compliance with an officers orders is a material fact when deciding whether the officers use of force was reasonable C. holding that recusal is appropriate when a reasonable person would seriously doubt the hearing officers objectivity D. holding that denial of a prerevocation parole violation hearing harmless beyond a reasonable doubt E. holding potential prejudice caused by equating reasonable doubt with a substantial doubt mitigated by providing an alternate definition of reasonable doubt as a doubt that would cause a reasonable person to hesitate to act

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that recusal is appropriate when a reasonable person would seriously doubt the hearing officers objectivity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Company and the Ides Investors and the Legion Investors shall be responsible for its own fees and expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation, execution, and effectuation of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, including, but not limited to attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the negotiation and execution of this Agreement and all other activities related to the foregoing; provided , however , that the Company shall (i) reimburse the Ides Investors for reasonable and documented out of pocket fees and expenses, including legal fees, incurred in connection with the 2016 Annual Meeting in an amount not to exceed $150,000 and (ii) reimburse the Legion Investors for reasonable and documented out of pocket fees and expenses, including legal fees, incurred in connection with the 2016 Annual Meeting in an amount not to exceed $25,000.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In signing below, Employee expressly acknowledges the enforceability, and continued effectiveness of Sections 8 , 9 and 11 of the Employment Agreement and promises to abide by those terms of the Employment Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties agree that any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the interpretation thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules, then in effect, of NFA or, if NFA shall refuse jurisdiction, then in accordance with the rules, then in effect, of the American Arbitration Association; provided, however, that the power of the arbitrator shall be limited to interpreting this Agreement as written and the arbitrator shall state in writing his reasons for his award, and further provided, that any such arbitration shall occur within the Borough of Manhattan in New York City. Judgment upon any award made by the arbitrator may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction.

assistant: Arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 114 S.Ct. 807, 127 L.Ed.2d 114 (1994). In the end, this requirement scuttles the appellants’ claim. It is perfectly clear that the Due Process Clause cannot serve to ground the appellants’ federal malicious prosecution claim. No procedural due process claim can flourish in this soil because Massachusetts provides an adequate remedy for malicious prosecution. See Roche, 81 F.3d at 256 (citing, inter alia, Beecy v. Pucciarelli, 387 Mass. 589, 441 N.E.2d 1035, 1038-39 (1982)). Similarly, a plurality of the Supreme Court has concluded that “substantive due process may not furnish the constitutional peg on which to hang” a federal malicious prosecution tort. Albright, 510 U.S. at 271 n. 4, 114 S.Ct. 807. We have followed the Court’s lead in this respect, see, e.g., Roche, 81 F.3d at 256 (<HOLDING>), and we hew to that line today. The Fourth Options: A. holding that section 1983 claims alleging due process violations stemming from malicious prosecution are unavailable when a state malicious prosecution action exists B. holding that the fourth amendment right implicated in a malicious prosecution action is the right to be free of unreasonable seizure of the person C. holding that there is no substantive due process right under the fourteenth amendment to be free from malicious prosecution D. holding that there is no due process right to appellate review E. holding the same for malicious prosecution

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that there is no substantive due process right under the fourteenth amendment to be free from malicious prosecution
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All of the issued shares of capital stock of each subsidiary of Group have been duly and validly authorized and issued, are fully paid and non assessable and are owned directly or indirectly by Group, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, equities or claims, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate have an Issuer Material Adverse Effect .

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). Meanwhile, the State argues in favor of applying New Jersey Court Rule l:5-6(b)(2), which would make the "properly filed” date when the clerk of the court marked the document “filed.” Because New Jersey law does not provide a clear answer and resolution of the issue has no impact on our final count of days tolled, we need not resolve this issue. 4 , The State raised this argument in its answer to Thompson’s habeas petition. 5 . The State also argues the pro se pleadings were proper because Thompson waived his right to counsel. We reject this argument for want of evidence that Thompson knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel. State v. Coon, 314 N.J.Super. 426, 715 A.2d 326, 330 (App.Div. 1998) Options: A. holding that one must voluntarily and intelligently waive the right to counsel B. holding that waiver of counsel may be valid absent an inquiry by the court where the surrounding facts and circumstances including the defendants background and conduct demonstrate that he actually understood his right to counsel and the difficulties of pro se representation and knowingly and intelligently waived his right internal quotation marks omitted C. holding that lower courts misunderstood the requirement for finding a valid waiver of the right to counsel where neither the trial court nor the arizona supreme court undertook to focus on whether edwards understood his right to counsel and intelligently and knowingly relinquished it D. holding that waiver of counsel during pcr review requires a judicial inquiry into whether defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel E. holding that in order for a waiver of counsel to be valid the trial court must ensure that the defendants waiver of his right to counsel is done knowingly and intelligently so that the record establishes that the defendants choice is made with eyes open

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that waiver of counsel during pcr review requires a judicial inquiry into whether defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: she endured when faced with the prospect of losing her position. (Id. at 68.) But such harm is not the kind of material harm that the DCHRA demands, but rather the sort of vague, subjective harm that this Circuit has repeatedly rejected as insufficient. See Stewart v. Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1135 (D.C.Cir.2002) (no adverse employment action where no change in position, grade, pay, or benefits); Forkkio, 306 F.3d at 1130-31 (“Purely subjective injuries ... are not adverse employment actions.”). In sum, then, the effect of Reed’s demotion (if it can be called that) was simply never felt. It was an hypothetical employment action, not an actual one, and thus does not satisfy the requirements of the prima facie case. See Pennington v. City of Huntsville, 261 F.3d 1262, 1267 (11th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). Reed’s allegations about the ERT fail for a Options: A. holding that mere reprimand even if it does not result in actual dismissal can constitute adverse employment action B. holding that when an employee suffers an injury from an unexplained fall while the employee is on the job and performing the duties of his employment that injury is eligible for compensation under the workers compensation act C. holding that where an employee was transferred to a new job site over 120 miles away that transfer while not per se an adverse employment action was an appropriate factor for the jury to consider in determining whether an adverse employment action occurred D. holding that the decision to reprimand or transfer an employee if rescinded before the employee suffers a tangible harm is not an adverse employment action E. holding that termination is an adverse employment action

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the decision to reprimand or transfer an employee if rescinded before the employee suffers a tangible harm is not an adverse employment action
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company and the Subsidiaries have, or have rights to use, all patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, service marks, trade names, trade secrets, inventions, copyrights, licenses and other intellectual property rights and similar rights necessary or required for use in connection with their respective businesses as described in the SEC Reports and which the failure to so have could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect (collectively, the “ Intellectual Property Rights ”). None of, and neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received a notice (written or otherwise) that any of, the Intellectual Property Rights has expired, terminated or been abandoned, or is expected to expire or terminate or be abandoned, within two (2) years from the date of this Agreement. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received, since the date of the latest audited financial statements included within the SEC Reports, a written notice of a claim or otherwise has any knowledge that the Intellectual Property Rights violate or infringe upon the rights of any Person, except as do not have or would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of the Company, all such Intellectual Property Rights are enforceable and there is no existing infringement by another Person of any of the Intellectual Property Rights. The Company and its Subsidiaries have taken reasonable security measures to protect the secrecy, confidentiality and value of all of their intellectual properties, except where failure to do so could not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: discrimination.” Id. Based on these findings, the district court concluded that the District had not violated the Plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment equal protéction rights since it had not acted with any discriminatory purpose or intent. Id. at 1367. We have explained previously that “[b]e-cause the issue is a factual one, this Court can reverse a district court’s finding of intentional discrimination only if the finding is clearly erroneous, is based on clearly erroneous subsidiary findings of fact, or is based on an erroneous view of the law.” Barber v. Int’l Bhd. of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers, 778 F.2d 750, 754 (11th Cir.1985) (emphasis added); see also, e.g., Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 287-90, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) (<HOLDING>); Rogers v. Lodge, 458 U.S. 613, 622-23, 102 Options: A. holding that the issue of discriminatory intent in a race discrimination case is a factual question for the trier of fact whose findings are reviewed only for clear error B. holding that findings of fact are reviewed for clear error C. holding that factual findings in sentencing context are reviewed for clear error D. holding that district courts factual findings for purposes of obstruction enhancement are reviewed for clear error E. holding that findings of fact from a bench trial are reviewed for clear error

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the issue of discriminatory intent in a race discrimination case is a factual question for the trier of fact whose findings are reviewed only for clear error
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the Release of Claims attached hereto constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties hereto regarding the termination of your employment. This Agreement supersedes all prior negotiations, discussions, correspondence, communications, understandings and agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: interlocutory orders and decrees issued under Title 11 section 1121(d), and (3) with leave of court, other interlocutory orders and decrees. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(a). The orders about which Edwards complains are not final judgments, orders, or decrees and neither this Court nor the bankruptcy court has given her leave to appeal those orders. The Court also does not have jurisdiction to strike the alleged “excess verbiage” in the order of remand which petitioner contends may confuse another court. Nor does it have jurisdiction to determine in advance whether the bankruptcy court’s orders will be the “law of the case” in the state court action; that is an issue for the state court to determine. Cf. Commercial Space Management Co., Inc. v. The Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1076 (9th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Options: A. holding that issue in motion for rehearing is waived if original brief is not sufficient to acquaint the court with the issue and does not present an argument that would allow the court to decide the issue B. holding the issue of use can be necessary to the adjudication by the board of adjustment of the underlying request for a variance when the issue is raised in the context of an issue the board of adjustment is required to decide C. holding that where an issue is raised in the district court but raised late and the district court declines to deem the issue waived the issue may be raised on appeal D. holding that issue of whether dismissal was with or without prejudice becomes ripe only when new action is filed and issue is raised the court in the new action should decide the issue E. holding that an issue is preserved for appeal where the issue was sufficiently raised for the court to rule on it

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that issue of whether dismissal was with or without prejudice becomes ripe only when new action is filed and issue is raised the court in the new action should decide the issue
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you have a pre-existing family account covering children aged under 13 then you have an ongoing responsibility to determine whether any of the yahoo services areas and/or content ( as defined in section 6 below ) are appropriate for your child .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Certified copies of all documents evidencing any necessary consents and governmental approvals (if any) required for the execution, delivery and performance by the Loan Parties of the documents referred to in this Section 12 .

assistant: Consents