flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company was formed on October 13, 2017 as a Florida limited liability company by the filing of the Certificate of Formation of the Company in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Florida in accordance with the Act. The Company shall continue until dissolved and terminated in accordance with this Agreement and the Act.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Restricted Holder acknowledges that its obligations under this Agreement are unique, recognizes and affirms that in the event of a breach of this Agreement by any Restricted Holder, money damages may be inadequate and Purchaser may have not adequate remedy at law, and agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed by a Restricted Holder in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. Accordingly, Purchaser shall be entitled to seek an injunction or restraining order to prevent breaches of this Agreement by any Restricted Holder and to seek to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof, without the requirement to post any bond or other security or to prove that money damages would be inadequate, this being in addition to any other right or remedy to which such party may be entitled under this Agreement, at law or in equity.

assistant: Specific Performance
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: at River-view, and the District did not consider Garza’s transfer final until it consulted with Garza’s union. {Id. ¶¶ 67, 72.) Since Garza has not demonstrated that his transfer to Riverview affected his wages, benefits, or career prospects, his transfer is not a materially adverse employment action for purposes of his retaliation claim. And given the entirely reasonable explanation the District offered for transferring Garza instead of Schuldt, it doesn’t even amount to evidence of discrimination. Garza’s performance reviews also do not constitute materially adverse employment actions as a matter of law. A negative performance review, under some circumstances, could constitute a materially adverse action. See Silverman v. Bd. of Educ. of Chicago, 637 F.3d 729, 741 (7th Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>). However, the majority of courts in this Options: A. holding that negative perform anee evaluations of a teacher constituted a materially adverse employment action for purposes of a retaliation claim B. holding that two counseling statements similar to negative performance evaluations do not rise to level of materially adverse employment action required under title vii C. holding that a negative criticism or performance evaluation unaccompanied by a materially adverse change in the terms or conditions of employment does not constitute adverse employment action D. holding that the plaintiffs placement on paid administrative leave constituted an adverse action for purposes of a first amendment retaliation claim E. holding that issuance of negative performance evaluations was not a materially adverse actions for purposes of a title vii retaliation claim because the plaintiff had failed to show that the evaluations were attached to financial harms though not commenting on other types of concrete harm such as denial of a timeoff award emphasis added quoting baloch 550 f3d at 1199

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that negative perform anee evaluations of a teacher constituted a materially adverse employment action for purposes of a retaliation claim
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Capitalized terms used in this Agreement that are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in Appendix A to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2017, among the Issuer, California Republic Funding, LLC, the Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, which Appendix is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement. Appendix A also contains rules as to usage applicable to this Agreement.

assistant: Definitions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice to be given under the terms of this Agreement to the Company shall be addressed to the Company in care of its Secretary, and any notice to be given to the Employee shall be addressed to him or her at the address stated in the Company’s employee records. By a notice given pursuant to this Section 11, either party may hereafter designate a different address for notices to be given to the party. Any notice that is required to be given to the Employee shall, if the Employee is then deceased, be given to the Employee’s personal representative if such representative has previously informed the Company of his status and address by written notice under this Section 11. Any notice shall have been deemed duly given when enclosed in a properly sealed envelope or wrapper addressed as aforesaid, deposited (with postage prepaid) in a post office or branch post office regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S.Ct. 2841, 92 L.Ed.2d 140 (1986), does not require a different result. In Hard-wick, the Court upheld the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy statute against Hard-wick’s claim that it violated his fundamental right to privacy. However, the Court specifically noted that Hardwick did “not defend the judgment below based on ... the Equal Protection Clause.” Id. at 196 n. 8, 106 S.Ct. at 2847 n. 8, 92 L.Ed.2d at 149 n. 8. Therefore, it is inapposite. See Schowengerdt v. United States, 944 F.2d 483, 490 n. 8 (9th Cir.1991) (distinguishing equal protection from substantive due process challenge to military policy), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 112 S.Ct. 1514, 117 L.Ed.2d 650 (1992); Evans v. Romer, 882 P.2d 1335, 1349-50, *40-41 (Oct. 11, 1994) (<HOLDING>); Prof. Cass Sunstein, Sexual Orientation and Options: A. holding that michigan rule barring sitting judges from nonjudicial offices did not violate equal protection B. holding unconstitutional a state decision awarding damages against a broadcasting company for invasion of privacy by disclosing the name of a rape victim in violation of a state statute which prohibited such disclosures C. holding that constitutional right of privacy does not apply to medical records D. holding state initiative barring protection against discrimination aimed at homosexuals unconstitutional and concluding that hardwick decision on right to privacy does not abate other rights of homosexuals E. holding that the constitutional protection of an individuals reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her home does not extend to a place of business

assistant: The best answer is D. holding state initiative barring protection against discrimination aimed at homosexuals unconstitutional and concluding that hardwick decision on right to privacy does not abate other rights of homosexuals
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any provision in this Agreement shall be found or be held to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction in which this Agreement is being performed, then the meaning of said provision shall be construed, to the extent feasible, so as to render the provision enforceable, and if no feasible interpretation would save such provision, it shall be severed from the remainder of this Agreement which shall remain in full force and effect. In such event, the parties shall negotiate, in good faith, a substitute, valid and enforceable provision which most nearly effects the parties’ intent in entering into this Agreement.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: district was platted and developed. In attempting to give effect to restrictive covenants, courts are not so much concerned with the grammatical rules or the strict letter of the words used as with arriving at the intention of the restrictor, if that can be gathered from the entire language of the instrument. Moreover, the language employed in stating the restriction is to be taken in its ordinary and generally understood or popular sense, and is not to be subjected to technical refinement, nor the words torn from their association and their separate meanings sought in a lexicon. Covenants are to be construed with reference to the present and prospective use of property as well as to the specific language employed and upon the reading as a whole rat l App 3d 356; 445 NE2d 1193 (1983) (<HOLDING>); In re Wallace’s Fourth Southmoor Addition to Options: A. holding that an amendment passed two years into a 10year automatic extension period was not effective until the 10year extension period expired and stating that to hold otherwise would render the extension provision meaningless B. holding that the states rule dates the beginning of the discovery period only from the filing of the answer C. holding that amendments of the restrictive covenants passed during the initial 20year term would not take effect until the beginning of the automatic 10year extension period D. holding that an amendment of restrictive covenants passed during the running of an automatic 10year extension period was not effective until the end of the 10year extension period E. holding that extension of a federal grand jurys term was within the discretionary powers of the district court

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that amendments of the restrictive covenants passed during the initial 20year term would not take effect until the beginning of the automatic 10year extension period
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to Mr. Cluff s conversation with Mr. Floyd, would have been cumulative of this prior testimony. See Hernandez-Urista, 9 F.3d at 84 (determining that the denial of a request for a subpoena is supported when witness testimony is merely cumulative); United States v. Mayes, 917 F.2d 457, 462 (10th Cir.1990) (same). As a final point, we note that the timing of Mr. Pursley’s Rule 17(b) request supports the propriety of its denial. Although Mr. Pursley filed his motion on the first day of trial, he never attempted to make a nonconclusory showing of necessity until the government rested. Mr. Pursley provided no justification for failing to act sooner. Granting Mr. Pursley even partial relief at that point had the potential to delay the completion of the trial. See Bloomgren, 814 F.2d at 585 (<HOLDING>); United States v. Stoker, 522 F.2d 576, 579 Options: A. holding that lack of timeliness of a rule 17b application supported the district courts decision to deny twentythree of twentysix requested subpoenas B. holding that timeliness of filing of notice of appeal is a jurisdictional issue C. holding costs of service of subpoenas recoverable D. recognizing district court application of the same rule E. holding that a rule 17b application filed on last day of governments case lacked timeliness and supported district courts limitation on subpoena requests

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that lack of timeliness of a rule 17b application supported the district courts decision to deny twentythree of twentysix requested subpoenas
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Credit Parties shall not use any portion of the proceeds of the Loans, either directly or indirectly, for the purpose of purchasing any securities underwritten by any Affiliate of Lender. In addition, the Credit Parties shall not use any portion of the proceeds of the Loans, either directly or indirectly, for any of the following purposes: (i) to make any payment towards any Funded Indebtedness of the Credit Parties or any Affiliates thereof, except as specifically permitted under the Use of Proceeds Confirmation; (ii) to pay any taxes of any nature or kind that may be due by the Credit Parties or any Affiliates thereof; (iii) to pay any obligations or liabilities of any nature or kind due or owing to any managers, officers, directors, employees, members, principals, or Material Shareholders of the Credit Parties or any Affiliates thereof, incurred prior to the Effective Date. The Credit Parties shall only use the proceeds of the Loans (or any portion thereof) for the purposes set forth in a “ Use of Proceeds Confirmation ” to be executed by Borrower on the Effective Date, unless Borrower obtains the prior written consent of Lender to use proceeds of Loans for any other purpose, which consent may be granted or withheld by Lender in its sole and absolute discretion.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you are responsible for all costs in relation to the use of your nintendo account , whether by yourself or by your friends , your family or any other third party ( including any internet connection fees , the costs for the necessary equipment and any other relevant fees and charges ) .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: version at Tex. Prob.Code Ann. § 37). We do not read them to say that an executor owes a legal duty of care to creditors that imposes individual liability on the executor, rather than on the estate, for estate debts. Later, section 37 of the Probate Code clarified that the estate of the decedent immediately vests in the devisees, legatees, and heirs at law of the estate, subject to payment of decedent’s debts, and that the executor thus holds the property in trust for the benefit of those who have acquired a vested right to the decedent’s property under the will. Tex. Prob.Code Ann. § 37. Relying on section 37, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals has held that an executor does not automatically hold the estate property in trust for estate creditors. Beaumont 1992, orig. proceeding) (<HOLDING>). Following our sister court in FCLT, we Options: A. holding that trustees fiduciary duty exists independent of any clause in trust agreement B. holding that relationship between executor and estates beneficiaries is one that gives rise to fiduciary duty as matter of law C. holding that a statutorilyimposed fiduciary obligation created an express trust fiduciary relationship for purposes of 523a4 D. holding that independent executor stands in fiduciary relationship with creditors of estate E. holding that a sellers superior knowledge of a product does not justify imposition of a fiduciary relationship in the absence of a conscious assumption of fiduciary duties

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that independent executor stands in fiduciary relationship with creditors of estate
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Schedule 1 contains an accurate list of all Subsidiaries of the Borrower as of the date of this Agreement, setting forth their respective jurisdictions of organization and the percentage of their respective Capital Stock owned by the Borrower or other Subsidiaries. All of the issued and outstanding shares of Capital Stock of such Subsidiaries have been (to the extent such concepts are relevant with respect to such ownership interests) duly authorized and issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: we determine if substantial evidence exists to support the agency’s decision by considering whether there is relevant evidence in the entire record which a reasonable mind might accept in support of the agency’s ruling. Dale, ¶22, 188 P.3d at 561. Findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence if, from the evidence preserved in the record, we can discern a rational premise for those findings. Bush v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers’ Comp. Div., 2005 WY 120, ¶ 5, 120 P.3d 176, 179 (Wyo.2005) (citations omitted). [¶ 10] If, in the course of its decision making process, the agency disregards certain evidence and explains its reasons for doing so based upon determinations of credibility or other factors contained in the record, its decision will be sus 32 P.2d 750, 754 (Wyo.1997) (<HOLDING>), overruled on other grounds in Torres v. State Options: A. holding that 707b does not violate the equal protection guarantees of the fourteenth and fifth amendments of the united states constitution and rejecting debtors voidforvagueness argument B. holding that the constitutional rights in a termination proceeding are derived from the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment of the united states constitution and not the sixth amendment C. holding that because the due process clause in the federal constitution is applicable to the states under the fourteenth amendment the right is also guaranteed to defendants pursuant to the identical provision in article i section 5 of the hawaii constitution D. holding that central assessment by the unit method of valuation did not violate the equal protection clause of the united states constitution or the uniform operation of laws provision in the utah constitution E. holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution

assistant: The best answer is E. holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: may recover for time spent on unsuccessful motions so long as it succeeds in the overall claim. See North Am. Corp. v. Allen, 636 S.W.2d 797, 800 (Tex.App.Corpus Christi 1982, no writ). In light of this careful consideration of the attorneys’ fees by the district court, the first portion of this claim fails. Rollins’ second complaint requests that the attorneys’ fee award be remanded to the district court because DPS’s attorney did not segregate the hours spent pursuing DPS’s breach of contract claims from the hours spent defending against Rollins’ counterclaims. Rollins claims that attorneys’ fees cannot be recovered under Texas law for defending against contract claims. See Ventana, 879 F.Supp. at 678; Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. Wild, 944 S.W.2d 37, 41 (Tex.App.Amarillo 1997, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). However, Texas law explicitly recognizes that Options: A. holding that unsegregated attorneys fees must be remanded B. holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees C. holding that inextricably intertwined exception did not apply that trial court erred by not requiring segregation and that case should be remanded to trial court for determination of the amount of the segregated attorneys fees D. holding that where plaintiff sought recovery of fees against multiple defendants evidence of unsegregated fees was more than a scintilla of evidence to support fee award what a reasonable attorneys fee would be for the entire case indicates what the segregated amount should be E. recognizing that a school district must be a prevailing party in order to be entitled to attorneys fees under the idea

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that unsegregated attorneys fees must be remanded
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: on the basis of public policy. Hotchkiss has recast its arguments regarding foreseeability as an issue of public policy. The two concepts are distinct and should be evaluated separately. Jaworski, 241 Conn. at 405, 696 A.2d 332 (“The final step ... is to make a determination of ‘the fundamental policy of the law ”) (citing Prosser & Keeton, On Torts § 43). Connecticut law requires courts to determine the existence of a duty by first evaluating whether a plaintiffs injury resulted from foreseeable risks. Monk, 273 Conn. at 114, 869 A.2d 179. If the court finds a foreseeable risk existed such that it fell within the scope of a defendant’s duty to exercise reasonable care, then the court proceeds to a public policy analysis. See, e.g., Jaworski, 241 Conn. at 404, 412, 696 A.2d 332 (<HOLDING>); RK Constructors, 231 Conn. at 387, 650 A.2d Options: A. holding that injuries covered by the act are not limited to external traumatic injuries B. holding first that tortfeasor could have foreseen that victims employers insurance premiums might increase and then deciding that public policy precluded liability for those increases C. holding that rico claims were personal and plaintiffs were therefore entitled to sue on their own because their injuries were distinct from the injuries to creditors in general resulting from the diversion of corporate assets D. holding first that injuries sustained during contact sports were foreseeable then deciding that public policy insulated the defendant from liability for those injuries E. holding that because claimants injuries were scheduled member injuries and not injury to his body as a whole any loss of earning capacity claimant may have sustained was irrelevant

assistant: The best answer is D. holding first that injuries sustained during contact sports were foreseeable then deciding that public policy insulated the defendant from liability for those injuries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subsequent to the termination of Executive’s employment and upon Affinity’s request, Executive agrees to be reasonably available to provide assistance to Affinity with respect to any legal issue that arose during or involved the period in which Affinity employed Executive in which Executive has pertinent information. Affinity will reimburse Executive for any reasonable expenses that Executive incurs in providing such assistance. Should such assistance require a significant portion of Executive’s time, Affinity and Executive will confer to attempt to agree upon a reasonable rate of compensation that Affinity will pay for Executive’s time.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: must demonstrate that (1) he was an eligible employee under the FMLA; (2) defendant is an employer under the FMLA; (3) plaintiff was entitled to leave under the FMLA; (4) plaintiff gave notice to defendant of his intention to take leave; and (5) plaintiff was denied benefits to which he was entitled under the FMLA. Rice v. Wayne County, 2010 WL 4861556 at *2-3, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125939 at *6 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2010). It is undisputed that plaintiff took leave three times, once for her son’s surgery and twice for a personal , 2010 WL 4366897 at *6, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114835 at *15 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2010) (“Plaintiffs theory of interference by termination is merely a retaliation theory in disguise”); Di Giovanna v. Beth Israel Med. Center, 651 F.Supp.2d 193, 203 (S.D.N.Y.2009) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, plaintiffs FMLA interference Options: A. holding that plaintiffs interference claim really is no more than an effort to dress his retaliation claim in barely different clothing B. holding that the plaintiff stated a claim for tortious interference C. holding plaintiff did not exhaust his retaliation claim where his eeoc charge made no mention of retaliation D. holding that retaliation claim was reasonably related to prior sex discrimination claim E. holding that interference and retaliation are two separate theories that can be advanced under the fmla and that termination is evidence of retaliation

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that plaintiffs interference claim really is no more than an effort to dress his retaliation claim in barely different clothing
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: responsibilities.” In Hollins, we listed a series of actions that may be considered a materially adverse change, including termination of employment, a demotion evidenced by a decrease in wage or salary, a less distinguished title, a material loss of benefits, or significantly diminished material responsibilities. Id. Here, the alleged actions are de mini-mus at best and none constitute a materially adverse action. None of the alleged retaliatory acts alleged resulted in a decrease in salary, a less distinguished title, or a loss of benefits. The placement on the performance improvement plan and the non-satisfactory work reviews had legitimate, non-retaliatory motivations and do not rise to the level of a materially adverse action. See Agnew v. BASF Corp., 286 F.3d 307 (6th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Hollins, 188 F.3d at 662 (holding that Options: A. holding that an employers requirement that an employee comply with a performance improvement plan or face disciplinary action did not constitute adverse employment action B. holding that termination is an adverse employment action C. holding that a negative criticism or performance evaluation unaccompanied by a materially adverse change in the terms or conditions of employment does not constitute adverse employment action D. holding that plan did not comply E. holding that a negative performance evaluation on its own is insufficient to constitute an adverse employment action as a matter of law

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that an employers requirement that an employee comply with a performance improvement plan or face disciplinary action did not constitute adverse employment action
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Company agrees to employ the Executive, and the Executive agrees to be employed by the Company. The term of the Executive’s employment by the Company under this Agreement will begin on November 9, 2015 and will continue until the date on which a new, permanent Chief Financial Officer commences employment with the Company or such later date as the parties mutually agree, unless terminated earlier upon written notice by either party or due to the Executive’s death (the “ Employment Term ”).

assistant: Employment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: By its acceptance of the benefits of this Agreement and the other Loan Documents, each Secured Party agrees that (a) the Loan Documents may be enforced only by the Administrative Agent, subject to Section 11.2 , (b) no Secured Party shall have any right individually to enforce or seek to enforce this Agreement or the other Loan Documents or to realize upon any Collateral or other security given to secure the payment and performance of the Obligations and (c) no Secured Party has any right to notice of any action or to consent to, direct or object to any action hereunder or under any other Loan Document or otherwise in respect of the Collateral (including the release or impairment of any Collateral) other than in its capacity as a Lender or an Issuing Lender and, in such case, only to the extent expressly provided in the Loan Documents.

assistant: Enforcements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, the unvested Service Tranche of the Cash Award granted hereunder then held by Participant shall become fully vested and the unvested Performance Tranche of the Cash Award granted hereunder then held by Participant shall vest at 150% of the Performance Metric.

assistant: Change In Control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: in addition to allowing you to create ugvs and collaborative ugvs , and transmit broadcast content via the apps , as described above , the service may also allow you to ( a ) create 15-second videos that include sound recording samples ( and the musical works embodied therein ) from thirty second portions of sound recordings ( sound recordings and the musical works embodied therein are `` sr samples '' ) made available by the company through the service through a company-provided library ( each , a `` company video , '' and together with ugvs and collaborative ugvs , `` user videos '' ) ; ( b ) save your user videos locally to your device ; ( c ) upload your user videos to the applicable app or certain third party social media platforms ( e.g. , instagram , facebook , youtube , twitter ) subject to the terms and conditions in this eula and any usage restrictions imposed by any licensors of s r samples ( e.g. , sound recording and/or musical work copyright owners ) ; ( d ) communicate your user videos to friends via different messaging services ; and ( e ) publicly display and perform your user videos and the embedded sound recordings and musical works to other users of the service .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Without limiting a Party’s right to appeal any order of the Bankruptcy Court, to the extent required under the Plan (i) the bankruptcy court overseeing the bankruptcy case of Station Casinos, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (the “ Bankruptcy Court ”) shall retain exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Agreement and to decide any claims or disputes which may arise or result from, or be connected with, this Agreement or any breach or default hereunder, and (ii) any and all proceedings related to the foregoing shall be filed and maintained only in the Bankruptcy Court, and the parties hereby consent to and submit to the jurisdiction and venue of the Bankruptcy Court and shall receive notices at such locations as indicated in Section 7.4; provided that if the Bankruptcy Court closes the above-referenced case, the Parties agree to unconditionally and irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts sitting in Clark County, Nevada, and any appellate court from any thereof, for the resolution of any such claim or dispute. The Parties hereby irrevocably waive, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any objection which they may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any such dispute brought in such court or any defense of inconvenient forum for the maintenance of such dispute. Each Party agrees that a judgment in any such dispute may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Each Party consents to process being served by the other Party in any suit, action or proceeding by delivery of a copy thereof in accordance with the provisions of Section 7.4. EACH PARTY WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, MATTER OR PROCEEDING REGARDING THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY PROVISION HEREOF .

assistant: Submission To Jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If you die prior to the Expiration Date, the Employment Term shall be terminated as of the date of death and your beneficiary or estate shall be entitled to receive (a) your Base Salary accrued up to and including the date of death and, thereafter, for a period commencing on such date and ending on the earlier of the Expiration Date and the first anniversary of the termination of the Employment Term, continued Base Salary, payable in accordance with Studio’s regular payroll practices applicable to similarly situated active employees, (b) equity-based compensation to be determined in the same manner and at the same time as provided in Paragraph 9.b, under and in accordance with any Plan, and (c) all other benefits pro-rated up to the date on which the death occurs.

assistant: Death
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you may not transfer any data that you receive from us ( including anonymous , aggregate , or derived data ) to any ad network , data broker or other advertising or monetization-related service .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company are set forth in the SEC Reports. Other than Liens on the equity interests of the Subsidiaries held by the Senior Lender, the Holders and the Original Holder, the Company owns, directly or indirectly, all of the capital stock or other equity interests of each Subsidiary free and clear of any Liens, and all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of each Subsidiary are validly issued and are fully paid, non-assessable and free of preemptive and similar rights to subscribe for or purchase securities.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: was allegedly violated on each date, despite the fact that the EOP contained several different provisions referring to various types of acts. Be cause the Counts in the Complaint merely alleged that Corder “did intentionally or knowingly violate the [EOP] issued in FC-DA No. 05-1-1551 on August 2, 2006[,]” without designating which conduct and sections within the EOP were violated, “the nature and cause of the accusation [could not] be understood by a person of common understanding from a reading of the Complaint itself.” Israel, 78 Hawai'i at 71, 890 P.2d at 308 (internal quotations marks omitted). The Complaint did reference in its caption (as opposed to in the charges) Police Report No. 07-016631 with respect to Count I, Police Report No. 07-021001 with respect t 1078, 1081 (1980) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, the Complaint was defective. II. Options: A. recognizing that the hrpp does not permit a broad and freeranging discovery in criminal cases B. holding that a discovery exception to a statute of limitation applies only to the discovery of facts not discovery of the law C. holding that discovery under the federal rules of civil procedure is broad in scope and freely permitted D. recognizing that the facts that a bill of particulars is discretionary with the judge pursuant to hrpp rule 7a and that other discovery rules are limited in scope might prevent a defendant from discovering the states position E. recognizing the fact that a bill of particulars is discretionary with the judge pursuant to hawaii rules of penal procedure hrpp rule 7a and the fact that other discovery rules given to the defendant are limited might prevent a defendant from discovering the states position

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing that the hrpp does not permit a broad and freeranging discovery in criminal cases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Harris has not tried to rebut by showing that the grand jury proceedings (or any other aspect of the indictment) were irregular. And cases interpreting Ohio law in analogous circumstances confirm that the officers had probable cause to believe that Harris knowingly attempted to cause physical harm by pushing Officer Harrison. See, e.g., Palshook v. Jarrett, 120 F.Supp.2d 641, 649 (N.D.Ohio 2000); Stillwell v. City of Xenia, No.2000CA-41, 2001 WL 127880, at *4, 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 573, at *11-12 (Ohio Ct.App. Feb.16, 2001) (noting that “evidence existed to support a criminal assault charge” under Ohio law when plaintiff “intended to and did strike [the officer] in the chest with both hands”); Matlock v. Ohio Dep’t of Liquor Control, 77 Ohio Misc.2d 13, 665 N.E.2d 771, 773, 775 (1996) (<HOLDING>); cf. Hopkins v. City of Westland, 21 F.3d 427 Options: A. holding that the opening of a makeup bag was justified when a woman had grabbed the bag when the officer turned away had resisted it being taken from her the bag felt heavy her companion had been armed the previous day and the officer and individual were alone B. holding that defendant adequately indicated to officers that she sought assistance of counsel when she stated that she wanted to call her lawyer and officer testified that request was unambiguous C. holding that a plaintiff could not show that she engaged in protected activity because she did not present evidence that she informed her employer that her complaints were based on race or age discrimination D. holding that excited utterance was proven when evidence showed that a patrol officer saw the victim screaming and waiving her hands when he approached she was crying her dress was ripped and she asked the officer to keep the defendant away from her E. holding that plaintiff did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that her arrest for assault under 290313 was unlawful or that her prosecution was malicious when she grabbed the officer from behind the officer pushed her away and she then grabbed the officers shirt

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that plaintiff did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that her arrest for assault under 290313 was unlawful or that her prosecution was malicious when she grabbed the officer from behind the officer pushed her away and she then grabbed the officers shirt
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: faith .... there is an acute change in the relationship between policyholder and insurer.”)). If such an agreement is entered into between the insured and the claimant, but it is later determined that the insurer did not, in fact, breach any of its obligations, then the insurer will not have to pay the stipulated judgment. See Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero, 210 Ariz. 5, 106 P.3d 1020 (2005). Generally, when an insured enters into a stipulated settlement with a claimant without notice to an insurance company, that breach of the cooperation clause relieves the insurance company from any liability under the policy. See, e.g., Smith v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 61 S.W.3d 280 (Mo.App.E.D.2001); see also Safeco Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 71 Cal.App.4th 782, 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 43 (1999) (<HOLDING>). In addition, the NYM insurance policies, as Options: A. holding that there is an actual controversy between an insurer and the party injured by the insured B. holding that insured may recover from its insurer any attorney fees incurred in successfully attempting to force the insurer to defend an action against the insured C. holding that if the insured is only partially compensated by the insurer both the insurer and the insured are real partiesininterest D. holding that insured cannot demand reimbursement for defense insurer had no opportunity to control if insured does not promptly notify insurer of facts triggering coverage E. holding despite a reservation of rights that when the insurer provides a defense to its insured the insured has no right to interfere with the insurers control of the defense and a stipulated judgment between the insured and the injured claimant without the consent of the insurer is ineffective to impose liability upon the insurer

assistant: The best answer is E. holding despite a reservation of rights that when the insurer provides a defense to its insured the insured has no right to interfere with the insurers control of the defense and a stipulated judgment between the insured and the injured claimant without the consent of the insurer is ineffective to impose liability upon the insurer
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The historical financial statements (including the related notes and supporting schedule) contained or incorporated by reference in the WES SEC Documents, (a) comply in all material respects with the applicable requirements under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act (except that certain supporting schedules are omitted), (b) present fairly in all material respects the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the entities purported to be shown thereby on the basis stated therein at the respective dates or for the respective periods and (c) have been prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the periods involved, in each case except to the extent disclosed therein. The other financial information of the General Partner and the Partnership and its subsidiaries, including non-GAAP financial measures, if any, contained or incorporated by reference in the WES SEC Documents has been derived from the accounting records of the General Partner, the Partnership and its Subsidiaries, and fairly presents the information purported to be shown thereby. Nothing has come to the attention of the Partnership that has caused it to believe that the statistical and market-related data included in the WES SEC Documents is not based on or derived from sources that are reliable and accurate in all material respects.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: MacDougall to take its training program, and Weichert shared the commission profits. The critical issue is whether the elements of control and dependence coupled with the absence of any employment protection predominate over factors that favor an independent contractor e problematic public policy does not constitute a clear mandate. Its alleged violation will not sustain a wrongful discharge cause of action. See, e.g., Pierce, supra, 84 N.J. at 76, 417 A.2d 505 (“As a matter of law, there is no public policy against conducting research on drugs that may be controversial, but potentially beneficial to mankind, particularly where continuation of the research is subject to approval by the FDA.”); DeVries v. McNeil Consumer Prods. Co., 250 N.J.Super. 159, 172, 593 A.2d 819 (App.Div.1991) (<HOLDING>); Schwartz v. Leasametric, Inc., 224 N.J.Super. Options: A. holding that discharge of employee for having distributed expired drugs at employers direction did not violate clear mandate of public policy because the discharge implicated only the private interests of the parties B. holding that the discharge of an employee hospitalized for illness did not violate public policy C. holding that federal law can provide source of state public policy for determining whether discharge of employee violated clear mandate of public policy D. holding that an employee has no right of action against an employer for wrongful discharge where no clear mandate of public policy is violated thereby E. holding that discharge of employee to avoid paying commissions on future transactions did not violate clear mandate of public policy

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that discharge of employee for having distributed expired drugs at employers direction did not violate clear mandate of public policy because the discharge implicated only the private interests of the parties