flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: You shall be indemnified by the Company, as an officer of the Company and its affiliates, against all actions, suits, claims, legal proceedings and the like to the fullest extent permitted by law, including advancement of expenses, partial indemnification, indemnification following the termination of this Agreement, indemnification of your estate and similar matters. For purposes of this Agreement, such indemnification shall extend to, to the fullest extent permitted by law, legal fees, costs, expenses, judgments, settlements, claim resolution payments, arbitration fees, arbitrator fees, mediation fees, negotiation fees and hold harmless obligations.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Colorado, without reference to its choice of law rules. Any action for breach or interpretation of this Agreement shall be brought in the federal or state courts, as appropriate, located in Colorado.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws that would require the application of the law of any other jurisdiction. By its execution and delivery of this Agreement, each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees for itself that any legal action, suit or proceeding against it with respect to any matter under or arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment rendered in any such action, suit or proceeding, may only be brought in either a state or federal court of competent jurisdiction in the State and County of New York. By execution and delivery of this Agreement, each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably accepts and submits itself to the exclusive jurisdiction of each such court, generally and unconditionally, with respect to any such action, suit or proceeding. EACH PARTY HERETO UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING REFERRED TO ABOVE.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The interpretive provisions specified in the Indenture shall be applicable to this Agreement. No failure on the part of the Collateral Agent to provide any Pledgor with any notice expressly required hereunder in connection with the exercise of any right, power or remedy hereunder shall impair the validity of exercise of such right, power or remedy.

assistant: Interpretations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The date of “Disability” of a Participant means the date on which the Participant is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months, eligible to receive income replacement benefits for a period of six or more months under the terms of the AbbVie Long-Term Disability Plan (“LTD Plan”) or, for a Participant whose Employer does not participate in the LTD Plan, such similar accident and health plan in which his or her Employer participates.

assistant: Disability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: has been interpreted to provide for full recovery regardless of contributory fault. Leaving aside for the moment the definitional condition, we turn our attention to the exception in the comment. As we said, if the statute in question has been construed to provide for full recovery rfegardless of contributory fault, the statutory tort action is not covered. We have construed our dram shop statute in just such a manner. Before comparative fault supplanted comparative negligence, we held that contributory negligence was no defense to a dram shop action. Williams, 197 N.W.2d at 617. Following our adoption of comparative negligence in Goetzman, we similarly held that this newly adopted doctrine was no defense to a dram shop action. Martin v. Heddinger, 373 N.W.2d 486, 488-89 (Iowa 1985) (<HOLDING>). Thus, the Iowa legislature was presumed to Options: A. holding that claims based on grounds not objected to at trial cannot be considered on appeal B. holding based only on commonlaw doctrine statutory comparative fault not considered C. recognizing that the tgaa was enacted to abrogate the commonlaw right of election doctrine D. recognizing doctrine E. holding that fault is considered in disposing of the marital homestead

assistant: The best answer is B. holding based only on commonlaw doctrine statutory comparative fault not considered
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS AGREEMENT AND THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS (OTHER THAN LETTERS OF CREDIT TO THE EXTENT SET FORTH THEREIN) SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

assistant: Applicable Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) Each Credit Party has complied with all applicable federal, state, provincial and local laws, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and guidelines (including consent decrees and administrative orders) including but not limited to Hazardous Material Laws, and is in compliance with any Requirement of Law, except to the extent that failure to comply therewith could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; and (b) neither the extension of credit made pursuant to this Agreement or the use of the proceeds thereof by the Credit Parties will violate the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended, or any of the foreign assets control regulations of the United States Treasury Department (31 CFR, Subtitle B, Chapter V, as amended) or any enabling legislation or executive order relating thereto, or The United and Strengthening America by providing appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (“USA Patriot Act”) Act of 2001, Public Law 10756, October 26, 2001 or Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001 issued by the President of the United States (66 Fed. Reg. 49049 (2001)).

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: EACH OF THE BORROWER, EACH GRANTOR AND THE COLLATERAL AGENT HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS INDENTURE, THE NOTES OR THE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: not be liable for unsecured claims during or after the case, the rule is reversed with respect to secured claims. Thus, exempt property remains liable for all liens not avoidable under the avoiding powers contained in the Bankruptcy Code. Similarly, a bankruptcy discharge will not prevent the enforcement of valid liens as against exempt property. Federal bankruptcy cases likewise hold that a debtor’s right to an exemption “is available to the debtor only to the extent that he holds an interest in the property that is not subject to unavoidable liens.” First of America Bank v. Gaylor (In re Gaylor), 123 B.R. 236, 239 (Bankr. E.D.Mich.1991); see also Day v. Boteler (In re Boteler), 5 B.R. 408, 411 (Bankr. S.D.Ala.1980); Chandler Bank of Lyons v. Ray, 804 F.2d 577, 579 (10th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>). Because Debtor voluntarily granted Comerica a Options: A. holding that the discharge injunction under 11 usc 524 does not preclude a creditor with a valid lien from enforcing its security interest against exempt as well as nonexempt property B. holding that where a security agreement contained collateral other than collateral for which creditor advanced funds to debtor since it secured antecedent debts as well as new debt and the agreement provided that the security interest secured payment and performance of the debtors present and future debts to the creditor the creditor did not have a pmsi and the debtors could avoid the creditors lien on collateral claimed as exempt C. holding that property seized by a creditor prior to debtors bankruptcy was property of the estate even though creditor the irs held a secured interest a tax lien in the property D. holding that under 42 usc 407a social security benefits commingled with other nonexempt funds in a bank account remain exempt if the funds are reasonably traceable to social security income E. holding that pennsylvania law determined the rights of a hypothetical lien creditor under 11 usc 544a1

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the discharge injunction under 11 usc 524 does not preclude a creditor with a valid lien from enforcing its security interest against exempt as well as nonexempt property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any term or provision of this Lease or any application thereof shall be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease and any other application of such term or provision shall not be affected thereby. If any late charges provided for in any provision of this Lease are based upon a rate in excess of the maximum rate permitted by applicable law, the parties agree that such charges shall be fixed at the maximum permissible rate. All the terms and provisions of this Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns (subject to Article XXIII ); provided, however, that (a) this Lease shall not inure to the benefit of any assignee pursuant to an assignment which violates the terms of this Lease and (b) neither this Lease nor any other document or agreement contemplated under this Lease shall be deemed to confer upon any Person not a party to this Lease any rights or remedies contained in this Lease. The headings in this Lease are for convenience of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect its meaning.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: snap group limited , snap inc. , and their affiliates take no responsibility and assume no liability for any content that you , another user , or a third party creates , uploads , posts , sends , receives , or stores on or through our services .

assistant: Limitation of liability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower shall not enter any transaction of any kind with any affiliate of the Borrower, except (i) transactions in the ordinary course of business at prices, and on terms and conditions that are fair and reasonable and not less favorable to the Borrower than could be obtained on an arm’s length basis from unrelated third parties, and (ii) transactions between Parent and Borrower that would not reasonably be expected to have or cause a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Transactions With Affiliates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (i) The Administrative Agent shall have received, with respect to (x) general property insurance policies and (y) general liability insurance policies, in each case, with an individual policy value in excess of $1,000,000, required by Section5.04 and which do not relate to the Vessels, a copy of, or a certificate as to coverage under, any such general insurance policies required by Section 5.04 and the applicable provisions of the Security Documents, each of which shall be endorsed or otherwise amended to include a “standard” or “New York” lender’s loss payable or mortgagee endorsement (as applicable) (or comparable language customary in the overseas insurance market) and shall name the Collateral Agent, on behalf of the Secured Parties, as additional insured (or comparable language customary in the overseas insurance market), in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, and (ii) the Administrative Agent shall be satisfied that the Insurance Deliverables Requirement shall have been satisfied with respect to each Collateral Vessel.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: information, it violates the [FDCPA].” Hecht v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, Civil No. 3:12cv498(JBA), 2013 WL 164514, at *2 (D.Conn. Jan. 15, 2013). Also, of relevance in the instant case, § 1692g(e) states that “the failure of a consumer to dispute the validity of a debt under this section may not be construed by any court as an admission of liability by the consumer.” The Second Circuit has provided the following guidance for analyzing alleged violations of § 1692(g): “When determining whether § 1692g has been violated, an objective standard, measured by how the ‘least sophisticated consumer’ would interpret the notice received from the debt collector, is applied.” Russell v. Equifax A.R.S., 74 F.3d 30, 34 (2d Cir.1996) (citing Clomon [v. Jackson ], 988 F.2d [1314, 1318 (2d Cir.1993)] (<HOLDING>)). “When a notice contains language that Options: A. holding that while a trial court has broad discretion to determine whether a term of probation has been violated findings of fact must rest on competent substantial evidence B. recognizing the circuit split and applying the subjective standard as more stringent without deciding which standard applies C. holding that defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether terms of supervised release have been violated D. holding that the least sophisticated consumer standard applies to whether 1692e has been violated E. holding that the preponderance of the evidence standard applies to 523 claims

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the least sophisticated consumer standard applies to whether 1692e has been violated
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Seller shall promptly furnish to Purchaser copies of any written notices received by Seller after the Effective Date, which notices relate to (i) any suit, judgment or other proceeding filed, entered or threatened with respect to the Property or Seller’s use or ownership thereof, (ii) any actual or contemplated changes in zoning of the Property or any other legal requirement which would adversely affect the operation, use, ownership or maintenance of the Property, (iii) any notices from any governmental agencies or other authorities that the Property is in violation of any Federal, state, county or municipal law, code, rule or regulation applicable to the Property, and (iv) any default by any other party or notice of claim of default by Seller made by any other party under any of the Leases or the Service Contracts.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither this Agreement nor any of the parties’ rights and obligations hereunder may be assigned by a party without the prior written consent of the other party hereto; provided, however, that the Company may assign any or all of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to (i) an affiliate of the Company, or (ii) a surviving entity in connection with a merger or consolidation involving the Company or a purchase or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, so long as such surviving entity assumes the Company’s obligations under this Agreement.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the shooting which resulted in Mendez’s death. {32} Defendant is liable for the crime of first-degree depraved-mind murder whether or not he fired the fatal shot. It appears that in this case the jury rejected Defendant’s version of the incident, and we will not substitute our judgment for that of the jury. We hold that sufficient evidence exists, to affirm Defendant’s conviction of first-degree depraved-mind murder on either a principal or accessory liability theory. V. {33} Defendant was charged and convicted of conspiracy to commit a first-degree depraved-mind murder. The State concedes that this conviction must be vacated because this Court has explicitly held that this is not a cognizable crime in New Mexico. We agree. See Baca, 1997-NMSC-059, ¶ 51, 124 N.M. 333, 950 P.2d 776 (<HOLDING>); cf. State v. Varela, 1999-NMSC-045, ¶ 42, 128 Options: A. holding that conspiracy to commit murder is not lesserincluded offense of firstdegree murder B. holding that a conviction for conspiracy to commit firstdegree depravedmind murder could not stand under current case law because conspiracy requires both intent to agree and intent to commit the offense which is the object of the conspiracy and depravedmind murder is an unintentional killing resulting from highly reckless behavior C. holding that where both firstdegree and felony murder were possible bases for a murder conviction a jury instruction that suggested the jury could rely on felony murder as the predicate offense for a conviction for conspiracy to commit murder was improper because under arizona law a conviction for conspiracy to commit firstdegree murder requires a specific intent to kill D. holding that an individual cannot attempt to commit murder of the second or third degree because the crime of attempt is a specific intent crime and an attempt to commit second or third degree murder would require proof that the individual intended to perpetrate an unintentional killing which is logically impossible E. holding criminal conspiracy is sustained where the commonwealth establishes the defendant entered into an agreement to commit or aid in an unlawful act with another person with a shared criminal intent and an overt act was done in furtherance of the conspiracy a coconspirator may commit the overt act and conspirators are liable for acts of the coconspirators committed in furtherance of the conspiracy

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a conviction for conspiracy to commit firstdegree depravedmind murder could not stand under current case law because conspiracy requires both intent to agree and intent to commit the offense which is the object of the conspiracy and depravedmind murder is an unintentional killing resulting from highly reckless behavior
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to the carrier or fund. Here, Libner does not allege that he directly notified the Association of the existence of the lien. He asserts that the Association should have been on notice as a result of his relationship with his client, his communications with the Association on behalf of that client, and the Association’s receipt of a copy of a letter Libner sent to his client indicating that he had a right to recover his fees. [¶ 11] Without deciding whether, and in what circumstance, an attorney may impose a lien against the fund of the opposing party or its carriers, we conclude that no lien may be imposed without direct and specific notice to the carrier or fund that a lien is asserted before the proceeds are disbursed. See Sowder v. Sowder, 127 N.M. 114, 977 P.2d 1034, 1038 (1999) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 12] Because Libner failed to provide any Options: A. holding that no lien may be imposed without direct and specific notice to the fund of an opposing party or its carriers that a lien is asserted before the proceeds are disbursed B. holding that the constitutional right to be present is satisfied so long as the defendant is given an opportunity to register his opinions with counsel after juror questioning and is present when the exercise of strikes is given formal effect even if the defendant is not present when his lawyer actually exercises the peremptory challenges C. holding that if an attorney seeks to assert a lien but does so only after distribution of the proceeds of the judgment his notice even if given to all appropriate parties is too late and the hen is lost D. holding that if no notice was given prior to the institution of an action a condition precedent to the right to bring the action does not exist and the buyerplaintiff has lost the right of his remedy E. holding that if an attorney is discharged without cause he is entitled to a charging lien for the reasonable value of his services rendered prior to the date of the substitution of counsel where 1 his representation was entirely competent and successful up until his discharge 2 any potential conflict of interest was disclosed and the plaintiff chose to continue to be represented by the attorney and 3 the discharge of the attorney occurred solely because of a fee dispute

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that if an attorney seeks to assert a lien but does so only after distribution of the proceeds of the judgment his notice even if given to all appropriate parties is too late and the hen is lost
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No supplement, modification, waiver or termination of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by the REIT and the Holders of at least a majority of the Registrable Shares (it being understood that a modification of Schedule I hereto to reflect a transfer permitted by Section 10 shall not be deemed to require such approval).

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower shall have performed and complied with all agreements and conditions contained in the Facility Agreement and the other Loan Documents to be performed by or complied with by the Borrower prior to the date hereof.

assistant: No Defaults
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and other communications hereunder and under this Agreement and each other Transaction Document (unless otherwise specified in such Transaction Document) shall be deemed given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, hand delivery, overnight mail or telecopy (confirmed by mail) if to a party hereto at the address for such party on the signature page set forth herein unless a party shall give notice in writing of a different address or facsimile number in the manner provided herein. Notices and other communications shall be (i) in the case of those by hand delivery, deemed to have been given when delivered to any officer of the party to whom it is addressed, (ii) in the case of those by mail or overnight mail, deemed to have been given when deposited in the mail or with the overnight mail carrier and (iii) in the case of a telecopy, deemed given when dispatched.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: not illegal, as most jurisdictions do not compel suspects to furnish documentation outside the context of traffic violations. In any event, New Mexico law is not entirely clear on whether someone in Mo-cek’s shoes might be required to answer basic questions about his identity, such as a request for his address. But Officer Dilley’s only request was for documentation, and failing to show documentation, in isolation, during an investigative stop for disorderly conduct might not amount to concealing one’s identity. Nonetheless, Officer Dilley is entitled to qualified immunity. A reasonable mistake in interpreting a criminal statute, for purposes of determining whether there is probable cause to arrest, entitles an officer to qualified immunity. See Pearson, 555 U.S. at 231,129 S.Ct. 808 (<HOLDING>); Fogarty, 523 F.3d at 1159 (resolving Options: A. holding that prison disciplinary hearing committee members are entitled to qualified immunity B. holding that an officer applying for a warrant without probable cause may be entitled to qualified immunity but is not entitled to absolute immunity C. holding that where defendant claiming qualified immunity relies on facts that are in dispute qualified immunity cannot be granted D. holding officials are entitled to qualified immunity for reasonable mistakes of law E. holding that defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity

assistant: The best answer is D. holding officials are entitled to qualified immunity for reasonable mistakes of law
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the Exhibits which are attached hereto or contemplated to be attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein and all documents specifically contemplated by this Agreement when executed, contain the entire understanding of the parties and supersede any and all other written or oral understanding.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: furthermore , under armour and its athletes may retain and continue to use , store , display , reproduce , share , modify , create derivative works , perform , and distribute any of your user-generated content that otherwise has been stored or shared through under armour .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement will commence on May 1, 2016 (the “ Effective Date ”) and expire on May 1, 2017, unless sooner terminated pursuant to Section 4 hereof (the “ Initial Term ”). Upon the end of the Initial Term, the Parties may extend this Agreement upon mutual consent for additional one (1) year periods (collectively, the “ Term ”).

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to a term of imprisonment of not less than five years. There was ample testimony that Hoffman “actively employed” a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime and a crime of violence. Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 144, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Oliver, Vasquez, and Rosado testified that Hoffman carried three firearms to the site of the robbery, that he handed two of these guns to Casbah and Oliver to assist him in the robbery, that he pointed a handgun at Vasquez and shot him in the leg, that he pointed a gun at Rosado and shot him in the b hallenging his convictions on the basis of sufficiency of evidence are persuasive. III. Hoffman argues that the government failed to prove that his activities affected interstate commerce and that, as a r r.1994) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we will affirm the conviction for Options: A. holding that purchase of search terms is a use in commerce B. holding that robbery of proceeds intended for purchase of cocaine affected interstate commerce C. holding that the connection between the robbery and interstate commerce was much more direct than in wang because at the time of the robbery the victim in walker was selling illegal drugs that had traveled through interstate commerce D. holding that the government can satisfy the hobbs act interstate commerce requirement by showing that the robbery resulted in the closure of a business engaged in interstate commerce E. holding that robbery of nationwide checkcashing company affected interstate commerce in violation of hobbs act

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that robbery of proceeds intended for purchase of cocaine affected interstate commerce
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS AGREEMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The term of this Agreement (the “ Term ”) shall commence on the Effective Date and, unless sooner terminated as provided in this Article 17, shall continue in full force and effect, on a country-by-country and Therapy-by-Therapy basis until such Therapy ceases being commercialized by either Party, at which time this Agreement shall expire with respect to such Therapy in such country (except for such provisions of this Agreement as continue beyond its natural expiration). The Term shall expire on the date this Agreement has expired in its entirety with respect to all Therapies in all countries in the world.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment, the Purchase Agreement and the Exhibits, Schedules and Appendices to the Purchase Agreement collectively constitute the entire agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements, understandings, negotiations, and discussions, whether oral or written, of the Parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof or thereof except as specifically set forth herein or therein.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: On the contrary, each of the co-conspirators testified under oath that his or her interview summary was true and correct. See e.g., PL’s Ex. 210 at 8-9 (Tr. Gnau G.J. testimony); PL’s Ex. 211 at 9 (Tr. Marcus G.J. testimony); PL’s Ex. 214 at 9 (Voss Grand Jury testimony); PL’s Ex. 269 at 10 (Tr. Spartin G.J. testimony); PL’s Ex. 204 at 10 (Peterson Grand Jury testimony). Had any of the co-conspirators testified falsely that he or she had told the plaintiff about the- illegal payoff scheme, the plaintiff would be rightly outraged, but that is not what occurred before the grand jury. Second, no legal requirement obliges prosecutors to include exculpatory information in presentations to the grand jury. United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36, 54-55, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Borda, 905 F.Supp.2d 201, Options: A. holding the government has an affirmative duty to disclose exculpatory evidence to a criminal defendant B. holding that the government is not required to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury C. holding the prosecutor is required to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury D. holding that courts have no authority to require the government to disclose exculpatory evidence to the grand jury because it would alter the grandjurys historical role E. holding that the prosecution must disclose to the defense all exculpatory evidence known to the state or in its possession

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that courts have no authority to require the government to disclose exculpatory evidence to the grand jury because it would alter the grandjurys historical role
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, except that no Loan Party may assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder or under any other Loan Document without the prior written Consent of the Agent and each Lender and no Lender may assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder except (i) to an Eligible Assignee in accordance with the provisions of Section (b) , (ii) by way of participation in accordance with the provisions of subsection Section 10.06(d) , or (iii) by way of pledge or assignment of a security interest subject to the restrictions of Section 10.06(f) (and any other attempted assignment or transfer by any party hereto shall be null and void). Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, shall be construed to confer upon any Person (other than the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, Participants to the extent provided in subsection (d) of this Section and, to the extent expressly contemplated hereby, the Related Parties of each of the Credit Parties) any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Agreement.

assistant: Successors
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: On the Closing Date, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein, substantially concurrent with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the parties hereto, the Company agrees to sell, and the Purchasers, severally and not jointly, agree to purchase, up to an aggregate of up to $10.0 million of Shares and Warrants. Each Purchaser’s Subscription Amount as set forth on the signature page hereto executed by such Purchaser shall be made available for “Delivery Versus Payment” settlement with the Company. The Company shall deliver to each Purchaser its respective Shares and a Warrant as determined pursuant to Section 2.2(a), and the Company and each Purchaser shall deliver the other items set forth in Section 2.2 deliverable at the Closing. Upon satisfaction of the covenants and conditions set forth in Sections 2.2 and 2.3, the Closing shall occur at the offices of the Placement Agent or such other location as the parties shall mutually agree. Unless otherwise directed by the Placement Agent, settlement of the Shares shall occur via “Delivery Versus Payment” (“ DVP ”) (i.e., on the Closing Date, the Company shall issue the Shares registered in the Purchasers’ names and addresses and released by the Transfer Agent directly to the account(s) at the Placement Agent identified by each Purchaser; upon receipt of such Shares, the Placement Agent shall promptly electronically deliver such Shares to the applicable Purchaser, and payment therefor shall be made by the Placement Agent (or its clearing firm) by wire transfer to the Company).

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: on the testimony of CBAC’s chief financial officer that MCD receives lease payments exceeding $50,000 per month. These rent payments are made pursuant to leases, the form of which is attached to the Development Agreement. The lease form, however, does not show that MCD is the landlord of these leases. Instead, it shows that the landlord under the lease agreement is a Series LLC. There is also no evidence in the record to establish that MCD is entitled to, or did retain any payments of rent under the leases. The fact that CBAC may forward rent to MCD for distribution to the Series LLC’s does not establish that MCD received a substantial direct benefit under the Development Agreement. See, e.g., In re Golden Peanut Co., LLC, 269 S.W.3d 302, 311 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2008) (orig. proceeding) (<HOLDING>). Courts that have applied direct benefits Options: A. holding that taxes were a claim against the estate that had to be filed in probate court thus reversing an order requiring heirs to pay taxes on estate property because the district court did not have jurisdiction B. holding fact that estate may ultimately distribute cash to heirs does not convert estates claim to claim by heirs for purpose of estoppel C. holding that estoppel was a question of fact D. holding that plaintiff failed to show genuine issue of material fact on equitable estoppel claim E. holding that no right of action is given to the estate of the victim of a tort but is granted only to his heirs if there are no heirs no right of action vests in anybody

assistant: The best answer is B. holding fact that estate may ultimately distribute cash to heirs does not convert estates claim to claim by heirs for purpose of estoppel
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parties agree that this Agreement shall not be disclosed to any Person other than (i) the Company and the Backstopper and their respective applicable officers, directors, employees, Affiliates, members partners, attorneys, accountants, agents and advisors, (ii) Persons that have entered into non-disclosure or similar agreements with a Party agreeing not to disclose information related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and (iii) in any legal, judicial or administrative proceeding or as otherwise required by law or regulation or as requested by a governmental authority (in which case the Company and the Backstopper agree, to the extent permitted by law, to inform each other promptly in advance thereof (other than in connection with any audit or examination by bank accountants or any governmental, regulatory or self-regulatory authority exercising examination or regulatory authority over a Party)).

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: After this transaction, the Company shall not sell, offer for sale or solicit offers to buy or otherwise negotiate in respect of any security (as defined in Section 2 of the Securities Act) that would be integrated with the offer or sale of the Securities such that the rules of the Trading Market would require shareholder approval of this transaction prior to the closing of such other transaction unless shareholder approval is obtained before the closing of such subsequent transaction.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Friendly, J., and dissenting opinion of Lombard, J.) 4 . A recent case in which the same situation prevailed is LaMade v. Wilson (1975) 168 U.S.App.D.C. 108, 512 F.2d 1348. There the trial court had ruled such evidence admissible. The issue of a curative instruction was not raised and the only issue was one of admissibility. 5 . 375 U.S. at 255, 84 S.Ct. at 317. 6 . 58 Am.Jur. § 530, p. 124. For an instance in which an appropriate instruction cured an impermissible reference to collateral benefits, see Edwards v. Steinns (4th Cir. 1953) 207 F.2d 734, 735. To the same effect, are Mixon v. Lovett (1970) 122 Ga.App. 517, 177 S.E.2d 826, 827, and Finley P. Smith, Inc. v. Schectman (Fla.App.) 132 So.2d 460, 466; cf. Franklin v. Sandersville Railroad Company (5th Cir. 1971) 445 F.2d 270, 271 (<HOLDING>) The point, however, has been most often Options: A. holding that the verdict must be sustained if there is any competent evidence to support the verdict B. holding there is no dutyimposed on trial judge to question jurys verdict of liability but no damages unless requested to by a party C. holding that jurys damagesrelated questions and verdict of liability with clearly inadequate damages of only medical expenses but no noneconomic damages in case where liability was hotly contested strongly suggested compromised verdict D. holding that admission of hearsay constituted harmless error when there was more than sufficient other evidence in the record to support the verdict E. holding that a verdict of no liability made any reference to collateral benefits harmless

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a verdict of no liability made any reference to collateral benefits harmless
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: at 397. This Court had cited the following language from Cooter v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 344 So.2d 496, 498 (Al.1977), which we find particularly telling: The fatal weakness of the appellants’ contention for coverage lies in its failure to acknowledge one of the elements essential to recovery for negligent entrustment — the negligent operation of the motor vehicle.... The plain wording of the exclusionary provision reveals the deficien 99 Tenn.App. Lexis 440 (Tenn.Ct.App.1999) (explaining that vehicle owner’s liability for negligent entrustment did not rest on imputed negligence, but was based on his own negligence in entrusting the automobile to an incompetent driver); Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Center Mutual Insurance Company, 658 N.W.2d 363 (N.D.2003) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 17 After study, however, we conclude that Options: A. holding that public policy favors the exclusion of intentional acts as contained in the mjua policy B. holding that because there were motor vehiclerelated acts of negligence and nonmotor vehiclerelated acts of negligence both involved in the same accident concurrent coverage under both the auto policy and the farm policy existed C. holding that there was no coverage because there was no occurrence within the meaning of the policy because defective workmanship does not constitute an accident or an occurrence under a commercial general liability policy D. holding that there was no evidence in the record to support appellants contention that the doctor committed a separate act of negligence by continuing to prescribe coumadin and that the doctors alleged failure to correct any previous negligence does not constitute additional acts of negligence E. holding that there was no evidence in the record to support appellants contention that the doctor committed a separate act of negligence by continuing to prescribe reglan and that the doctors alleged failure to correct any previous negligence does not constitute additional acts of negligence punctuation omitted

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that because there were motor vehiclerelated acts of negligence and nonmotor vehiclerelated acts of negligence both involved in the same accident concurrent coverage under both the auto policy and the farm policy existed
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Upon the termination of the Security Agreement in accordance with Section 6.11 thereof, the Collateral Agent shall, at the expense of such Grantor, execute, acknowledge, and deliver to the Grantors an instrument in writing in recordable form releasing the lien on and security interest in the Trademarks under this Trademark Security Agreement.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company and I acknowledge and agree that the Company’s election not to provide me with Garden Leave Pay as set forth in Section 8(c) shall be deemed a waiver of my noncompetition obligations under Section 8(c). Otherwise, no waiver of any of my obligations under this Agreement shall be effective unless made in writing by the Company. The failure of the Company to require my performance of any term or obligation of this Agreement, or the waiver of any breach of this Agreement, shall not prevent the Company’s subsequent enforcement of such term or obligation or be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach.

assistant: Waivers