flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall terminate upon the earliest of (a) the Effective Time, (b) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, (c) written notice of termination of this Agreement by Quintiles to the Shareholders (d) the entry into any amendment or modification of the Merger Agreement without the prior written consent of the Shareholders or any waiver of any of IMS Health’s rights under the Merger Agreement, in each case, which (i) results in a change in the amount or form of the Merger Consideration, (ii) results in an extension of the Outside Date or (iii) is materially adverse to any of the Shareholders and (e) the date on which the IMS Health Board effects an IMS Health Adverse Recommendation Change (such earliest date being referred to herein as the “ Termination Date ”); provided that the provisions set forth in this Section 4, Section 7 and Sections 11 to 29 shall survive the termination of this Agreement; provided further that any liability incurred by any party hereto as a result of a breach of a term or condition of this Agreement prior to such termination shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The interpretation, performance and enforcement of this Grant Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to principles of conflicts of laws. The Holder may only exercise his or her rights in respect of the Plan, the Grant Agreement and these Units to the extent that it would be lawful to do so, and Mattel would not, in connection with this Grant Agreement, be in breach of the laws of any jurisdiction to which the Holder may be subject. The Holder shall be solely responsible to seek advice as to the laws of any jurisdiction to which he or she may be subject, and a participation by a Holder in the Plan shall be on the basis of a warranty by the Holder that the Holder may lawfully so participate without Mattel being in breach of the laws of any such jurisdiction.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any and all notices or other communications or deliveries to be provided by the Payee hereunder, including, without limitation, any conversion notice, shall be in writing and delivered personally, by facsimile, sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier service or sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the Maker, or such other address or facsimile number as the Maker may specify for such purposes by notice to the Payee delivered in accordance with this paragraph. Any and all notices or other communications or deliveries to be provided by the Maker hereunder shall be in writing and delivered personally, by facsimile, sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier service or sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the Payee at the address of the Payee appearing on the books of the Maker, or if no such address appears, at the principal place of business of the Payee. Any notice or other communication or deliveries hereunder shall be deemed given and effective on the earliest of (i) the date of transmission if delivered by hand or by telecopy that has been confirmed as received by 5:00 p.m. on a business day, (ii) one business day after being sent by nationally recognized overnight courier or received by telecopy after 5:00 p.m. on any day, or (iii) five business days after being sent by certified or registered mail, postage and charges prepaid, return receipt requested.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: but before its effective date. Bishop argues that defendants therefore had notice that their conduct was unlawful discrimination at the time that it occurred, and may be held liable for it in a suit brought after the effective date of the ADA. In sum, this argument states that the date of enactment governs when conduct became unlawful, while the effective date only governs when an injured party may bring suit to enforce the provisions of the ADA. A careful reading of Landgraf and Rivers, however, counsels against accepting Bishop’s arguments. First, while these opinions did in fact address cases pending at the time of enactment of the ADA, they both speak in terms of the law effective at the time the allegedly discriminatory conduct occurred. See Landgraf — U.S. at-, 114 S.Ct. at 1508 (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added); Rivers, — U.S. at-, 114 Options: A. recognizing that aedpa would not apply to a habeas petition that was pending at the time of its enactment B. recognizing that new law did not apply to claims that accrued prior to enactment C. holding that aedpa amendments to 2254 apply only to such cases as were filed after the statutes enactment D. holding that the fair sentencing act does not apply retroactively to defendants whose criminal conduct occurred before its enactment even if those defendants were sentenced after its enactment E. holding that section 1981a does not apply to cases arising before its enactment

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that section 1981a does not apply to cases arising before its enactment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The terms and provisions of this Agreement will be subject to such reasonable changes of construction as determined by the Administrative Agent to reflect the implementation of the EMU in any Participating Member State or any market conventions relating to the fixing and/or calculation of interest being changed or replaced and to reflect market practice at that time, and subject thereto, to put the Administrative Agent, the Revolving Credit Lenders and the Borrowers in the same position, so far as possible, that they would have been if such implementation had not occurred. In connection therewith, each Borrower agrees, at the request of the Administrative Agent, at the time of or at any time following the implementation of the EMU in any Participating Member State or any market conventions relating to the fixing and/or calculation of interest being changed or replaced, to enter into an agreement amending this Agreement in a mutually satisfactory manner.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Buyer shall have the one-time right to assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to an entity wholly owned and controlled by the principals of Buyer, by giving prior written notice to Seller, provided that such assignee expressly assumes the obligations of Buyer arising thereafter, provided however that Buyer remains liable for any obligations of “Buyer” under this Agreement notwithstanding any such assignment (i.e., as if such assignment did not occur). Any assignee shall succeed to all the rights and remedies hereunder, including, but not limited to, the specific performance of this Agreement.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 21, 2011 EEOC Addendum; November 15, 2012 EEOC Charge. Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to the Federal Defendants and her Title VII and ADEA claims fail on this independent basis. See Johnson v. Ashcroft, No. 00-cv-2743, 2001 WL 34366564, at *3 (D.D.C. June 21, 2001) (dismissing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies where the plaintiff did “not name either of the federal defendants” in the plaintiffs EEOC complaint). The plaintiffs Complaint also asserts a claim of wrongful discharge related to her termination. Yet, Title VII and the ADEA provide the exclusive remedy for federal employees alleging race and age discrimination. See Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 96 S.Ct. 1961, 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (<HOLDING>); Chennareddy v. Bowsher, 935 F.2d 315, 318 Options: A. holding that title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 provides the exclusive remedy for claims of employment discrimination by federal agencies B. recognizing title vii does not provide the exclusive remedy for all employment discrimination claims even if the title vii and section 1983 claim factually overlap C. holding that title vii provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment D. holding that a claim for discrimination in private employment is not preempted by title vii E. holding that title vii did not provide exclusive remedy for sex discrimination in public employment claim could also be brought under equal protection clause

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that title vii provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 7. In the event that the Receiving Party or any of its Representatives are requested pursuant to, or required by, applicable law or regulation or by legal process to disclose any Confidential Information or any other information concerning the Disclosing Party or the Evaluation, unless prohibited by law, the Receiving Party shall provide the Disclosing Party with prompt notice of such request or requirement in order to enable the Disclosing Party

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: low-risk commitment for sixty days, and recommended a STEP camp for boys. The judge explained that he was rejecting the “community control” recommendation of the Department of Juvenile Justice (department) because A.R. previously stole from the same store, has disciplinary problems at school, was suspended from a school drop-out prevention program and, despite previous youth mediation, stole in the instant case “because he wanted something sweet.” A.R. objected to the judge’s departure from the department’s recommendation. We affirm A.R.’s adjudication of delinquency without discussion. We reverse A.R.’s commitment, however, to allow the court to receive and consider a recommendation from the department as to restrictiveness level. See S.R. v. State, 683 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (<HOLDING>). We accordingly affirm A.R.’s adjudication of Options: A. holding that juvenile court has no jurisdiction to consider constitutional claims B. holding juveniles do not have constitutional right to a jury trial but striking down statute that allowed juveniles to receive adult sentence without a jury trial three justices dissented reasoning juveniles should be entitled to a juiy trial under all cases because changes to juvenile justice code treated juveniles like criminals C. holding that where the department recommends community control for a juvenile the trial court is required to receive and consider a further restrictivenesslevel recommendation before ordering the juveniles commitment D. holding juveniles statement inadmissible when after being placed in custody police took juvenile to police station and held juvenile in area where adult suspects were held instead of taking juvenile to a juvenile processing office or any of the places listed as an alternative in section 5202 and placing juvenile in specifically designated office for juveniles E. recognizing juveniles right to counsel in certain juvenile proceedings

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that where the department recommends community control for a juvenile the trial court is required to receive and consider a further restrictivenesslevel recommendation before ordering the juveniles commitment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: defect — some sort of “[deviation from a legal rule” — that has not been intentionally relinquished or abandoned, i.e., affirmatively waived, by the appellant. Second, the legal error must be clear or obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute. Third, the error must have affected the appellant’s substantial rights, which in the ordinary case means he must demonstrate that it “affected the outcome of the [trial] court proceedings.” Fourth and finally, if the above three prongs are satisfied, the [appellate court] has the discretion to remedy the error — discretion which ought to be exercised only if the error “ ‘seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.’ ” (Emphasis in original.) Kelly, 290 Ga. at 33. See also Gates, 298 Ga. at 327 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, beyond showing a clear or Options: A. holding without comment that kelly applies to restitution paid to a victim bank B. recognizing that this test applies in every federal circuit save the fourth and the ninth C. holding restitution paid to a local department store is not dischargeable pursuant to kelly D. holding that if no evidence was presented to support the prevailing party there is no evidence upon which to apply the substantial evidence test and therefore the capricious disregard standard applies E. recognizing that the test adopted in kelly applies to rulings on evidence

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing that the test adopted in kelly applies to rulings on evidence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No waiver, modification or amendment of any provision of this Agreement will be valid or effective unless made in writing and signed by a duly authorized officer of each Party. The failure of either Party to assert a right hereunder or to insist upon compliance with any term or condition of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of that right or excuse a similar subsequent failure to perform any such term or condition.

assistant: No Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Employee hereby represents and warrants to the Released Parties that Employee has not: (A) filed, caused or permitted to be filed any pending proceeding (nor has Employee lodged a complaint with any governmental or quasi-governmental authority) against any of the Released Parties, nor has Employee agreed to do any of the foregoing; (B) assigned, transferred, sold, encumbered, pledged, hypothecated, mortgaged, distributed, or otherwise disposed of or conveyed to any third party any right or Claim against any of the Released Parties that has been released in this Agreement; or (C) directly or indirectly assisted any third party in filing, causing or assisting to be filed, any Claim against any of the Released Parties. Except as set forth in Section 11 below, Employee covenants and agrees that he shall not encourage or solicit or voluntarily assist or participate in any way in the filing, reporting or prosecution by himself or any third party of a proceeding or Claim against any of the Released Parties.

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, (a) keep and maintain all property material to the conduct of its business in good working order and condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and (b) maintain, with financially sound and reputable insurance companies, insurance in such amounts and against such risks as are customarily maintained by companies engaged in the same or similar businesses operating in the same or similar locations.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: as between you and masquerade , masquerade owns and retains all copyrights , trademarks , domains , trade secrets , patents , and other intellectual property rights in and to our services , including the masquerade content .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and is not barred. The negligence claim based on “failing to adequately test and inspect” plainly qualifies as one based on “inspection” and it is likewise excepted from the time bars. The remaining claim is based on “construction and maintenance.” The Johnson distinction does not save a claim based on faulty construction of a component. But the exception for maintenance does save this claim to the extent that the Siewerts base it on “maintenance” of “power distribution systems.” NSP argues that, with respect to the claims that might fall under this exception, the Siewerts have not alleged facts sufficient to establish the duty element of their negligence claims against NSP and therefore have failed to prove a statutory exception to the statute of repose. See Aquila, 718 N.W.2d at 886 (<HOLDING>). We conclude that the Siewerts have alleged Options: A. recognizing fiduciary exception in the erisa context B. recognizing the rule and the exception but holding facts did not support claim to exception C. holding that the burden of proving a violation of the idea lies on the party seeking relief during the administrative process D. recognizing exception E. holding in context of minnstat 541051 that burden of proving exception lies with party who seeks to claim benefit of exception

assistant: The best answer is E. holding in context of minnstat 541051 that burden of proving exception lies with party who seeks to claim benefit of exception
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any term or provision of this Lease or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease, or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Lease shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The provisions of this Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, except that Borrower may not assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder or under any of the other Loan Documents without the prior written consent of the Lenders. Any of the Lenders may assign or otherwise transfer any of their rights or obligations hereunder or under any of the other Loan Documents to an assignee (i) in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.05(b) , (ii) by way of participation in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.05(e) or (iii) by way of pledge or assignment of a security interest subject to the restrictions of Section 13.05(g) . Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, shall be construed to confer upon any Person (other than the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, Participants to the extent provided in Section 13.05(e) and, to the extent expressly contemplated hereby, the Indemnified Parties) any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Agreement.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The effective date of this Agreement shall be the eighth (8th) day after Employee signs and delivers it to the Company in accordance with Section 3 above, unless Employee revokes the Agreement before then in accordance with Section 4 above. If Employee fails to accept this Agreement in accordance with Section 3 above, or timely revokes the Agreement in accordance with Section 4 above, the Agreement will not become effective and will not be binding on Employee or the Company.

assistant: Effective Dates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: on the government’s witness list but was not on the amended list DeWilliams received the morning of June 10, the first day of trial. In regard to DeWilliams’ first point, we agree with the general proposition that a change in representation, whether due to newly assigned counsel or the decision to proceed pro se, may, under some circumstances, entitle a criminal defendant to a continuance in order to prepare adequately for trial. See United States v. Akers, 215 F.3d 1089, 1099 (10th Cir.2000) (suggesting that, when a trial court grants a defendant’s request for self-representation, “it arguably would be an abuse of discretion and a denial of due process to deny the defendant’s request for a continuance to prepare for trial”); United States v. King, 664 F.2d 1171, 1173 (10th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>). To the extent the district court, by imputing Options: A. recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees the right to effective assistance of counsel B. holding that the sixth amendment right to counsel embodies the right to effective assistance of counsel C. holding the sixth amendment right to effective assistance extends to a criminal defendants first appeal as of right D. recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel E. holding that a newly assigned counsel may be entitled to a continuance based on the criminal defendants sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a newly assigned counsel may be entitled to a continuance based on the criminal defendants sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) The Company agrees to pay to CBNA for the account of each Lender a commitment fee in Dollars which shall accrue at the Applicable Rate on the average daily amount of the unused Commitment of such Lender during the period from and including the date hereof to but excluding the date on which such Commitment terminates. Accrued commitment fees shall be payable in arrears on the last day of March, June, September and December of each year and on the date on which the Commitments terminate, commencing on the first such date to occur after the date hereof. All commitment fees shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days and shall be payable for the actual number of days elapsed (including the first day but excluding the last day).

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All requisite action on the part of the Share Acquiror and its directors and stockholders, required by applicable Law for the authorization, execution and delivery by the Share Acquiror of this Agreement and the performance of all of its obligations thereunder, including the acquisition of the Shares, has been taken. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Share Acquiror and upon the due execution and delivery thereof by the Company, will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Share Acquiror, enforceable against the Share Acquiror in accordance with their respective terms except as limited by the Enforceability Exceptions.

assistant: Authorizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) Commitment fees and interest in respect of ABR Loans based upon clause (a) of the definition of ABR shall be calculated on the basis of a 365- (or 366- as the case may be) day year for the actual days elapsed (including the first day and excluding the last day). Interest in respect of Eurocurrency Loans, Bid Loans and ABR Loans based upon clause (b) or (c) of the definition of ABR and Letter of Credit Fees shall be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year for the actual days elapsed (including the first day and excluding the last day), provided , that interest in respect of Foreign Currency Loans denominated in Pounds Sterling, Australian Dollars, Canadian Dollars or New Zealand Dollars shall be calculated on the basis of a 365- (or 366- as the case may be) day year for actual days elapsed. The Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the Borrowers and the Banks of each determination of a Eurocurrency Rate. Any change in the interest rate on a Committed Rate Loan resulting from a change in the ABR shall become effective as of the opening of business on the day on which such change in the ABR shall become effective. The Administrative Agent or the Foreign Currency Agent, as applicable, shall promptly notify the Borrowers and the Banks of the effective date and the amount of each such change.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: counsel and hence are not taxable costs. The Court disagrees with Plaintiffs, however, to the extent that Plaintiffs argue that all photocopying expenses are not taxable costs. Both 28 U.S.C. § 1920(4) and Local Rule 54.1 specify that taxable costs include “fees for exemplification and copies of papers necessarily obtained for use in the case.” 28 U.S.C. § 1920(4). Although the statute does not explicitly address costs for photographs utilized in the lawsuit, courts have broadly interpreted “copies of papers” to also encompass necessary photography costs. See, e.g. 89, 390 (D.D.C.1995) (noting that “the overwhelming weight of authority” has “declined to award costs for courier services, postage, telephone or fax charges”); Embotelladora Agral Regiomontana, 952 F.Supp. at 418 (<HOLDING>). As Defendant has not presented the Court with Options: A. holding that the costs of computerized research should be characterized not as taxable costs but as attorneys fees B. holding that civil rights complainants with pending eeoc charges should file their section 1981 claims in court and request a stay until the charges are resolved C. holding that postage charges and telecopy charges are not taxable costs D. holding that federal express costs telephone expenses and postage expenses did not qualify as taxable costs E. holding that courier and messenger costs are not taxable costs

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that postage charges and telecopy charges are not taxable costs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event of any event described in Section 2 (h) of the Plan occurring after the Date of Grant, the adjustment provisions as provided for under Section 2 (h) of the Plan shall apply to the PSUs .

assistant: Adjustments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: From time to time after the date hereof, each of the parties hereto shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions necessary or appropriate to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts or duplicate originals, both of which shall be regarded as one and the same instrument, and which shall be the official and governing version in the interpretation of this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile signatures or other electronic means and such signatures shall be deemed to bind each Party as if they were original signatures.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Crowder v. Housing Auth. of City of Atlanta, 990 F.2d 586, 591 (11th Cir.1993) (citing Perry Educ. Ass’n. v. Perry Local Educators’ Ass’n., 460 U.S. 37, 46 n. 7, 103 S.Ct. 948, 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983)). As such, “the government may restrict access to limited public fora by content-neutral conditions for the time, place, and manner of access, all of which must be narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest.” Id. (citing Peory, 460 U.S. at 45-46, 103 S.Ct. 948). There is a significant governmental interest in conducting orderly, efficient meetings of public bodies. Jones, 888 F.2d at 1332. One recognized way to conduct orderly, efficient meetings under Jones is for public bodies, such as a city council, to confine their meetings to specified subject matter. Id. at 1333 (<HOLDING>); see also Kindt v. Santa Monica Rent Control Options: A. holding that public meeting did not satisfy public participation requirement because public did not receive adequate notice B. holding that bond and miller did not apply because the plaintiff was appointed to the city council by the mayor rather than elected by the public C. holding that meetings with representatives of various affected parties were insufficient to meet public participation requirement because there was never an opportunity for the public at large to comment on the plan without explaining why such opportunity was necessary D. holding that removing a speaker from a city council meeting rather than allowing that person to speak during the public comment section of the meeting constituted a unconstitutional restriction on speech E. holding that the removal of a public speaker by the mayor at a city commission meeting was not a first amendment violation and thus permissible because to deny the presiding officer the authority to regulate irrelevant debate and disruptive behavior at a public meeting would cause such meetings to drag on interminably and deny others the opportunity to voice their opinions

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the removal of a public speaker by the mayor at a city commission meeting was not a first amendment violation and thus permissible because to deny the presiding officer the authority to regulate irrelevant debate and disruptive behavior at a public meeting would cause such meetings to drag on interminably and deny others the opportunity to voice their opinions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the necessi 04-05 (2d Cir.1990) (upholding admissibility of expert testimony concerning drug-related function of ledger, shoe boxes, and other items seized from defendant’s apartment and explaining narcotics dealers’ use of “beepers” to avoid detection), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 940, 111 S.Ct. 1397, 113 L.Ed.2d 453 (1991); United States v. Campino, 890 F.2d 588, 593 (2d Cir.1989) (upholding trial court’s ruling admitting expert testimony concerning drug dealers’ use of electronic surveillance equipment similar to that found at defendants’ apartment and testimony that seized notebooks contained records of amounts owed by customers for cocaine transactions), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1068, 110 S.Ct. 1787, 108 L.Ed.2d 788 (1990); United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1133-34 (2d Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081, 110 S.Ct. 1139, Options: A. holding admissible testimony of jurors describing jury review of information not admitted into evidence B. holding admissible expert witness testimony generally describing heroindistribution methods and interpreting organizedcrime terminology heard on taperecordings introduced in evidence C. holding that admission of hearsay testimony was harmless where the jury heard admissible testimony from three other sources to the same effect D. holding future dangerousness expert testimony to be admissible E. holding that improper admission of expert testimony was harmless in light of otherwise overwhelming evidence and fact that testimony covering substantially the same area was introduced without challenge

assistant: The best answer is B. holding admissible expert witness testimony generally describing heroindistribution methods and interpreting organizedcrime terminology heard on taperecordings introduced in evidence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to property” and thereby be eligible for revival under the Revival Act, such a claim must not be an action for either personal injury or breach of a contract. Because the warranty claim asserted by Chase is not an action for personal injuries, the crucial question is whether it is a breach of contract action within the meaning of § 25-b. New York courts have interpreted claims for breach of warranty as breach of contract actions within the meaning of GCL § 25-b. Therefore, New York courts would find that a breach of warranty action is not an action for injury to property and would not be revived by the Toxic Tort Revival Act. In Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp., 305 N.Y. 140, 111 N.E.2d 421 (1953), the New York Court of A . 182, 183, 22 N.Y.S.2d 238, 239 (N.Y.City Ct.Kings Co. 1940) (<HOLDING>); see also Great American Indemnity Co. v. Lapp Options: A. holding that this courts sixyear statute of limitations is jurisdictional B. holding that violation of accountants duties mandated by statute did not create a cause of action based on breach of implied contract for employee C. holding that sixyear contract statute of limitations did not apply reasoning that an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on breach of warranty is only nominally based on contract D. holding that the sixyear statute of limitations on a written contract is applicable to a cause of action based on a um policy E. recognizing that the elements of a claim for breach of contract are 1 existence of a valid contract and 2 breach of the terms of that contract

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that sixyear contract statute of limitations did not apply reasoning that an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on breach of warranty is only nominally based on contract
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of an alleged party “is a question of fact”). The trial court correctly noted that the mere signing of an agreement as a corporate officer does not impose personal liability on that officer, citing Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Wilson, 210 So.2d 761, 763 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (“It has been established that the signature of a corporate officer placed under the name of the corporation and preceded by the word ‘By’ does not create personal liability.”). Unlike the situation in Wilson in which the “parties to the contract are clearly set out in the body of the contract,” id., the agreement at issue states at the outset that it is “between BugWare, Inc. ... and Michael J. Williams of Williams Environmental & Geological Services, LLC,” thereby creati Inc., 763 So.2d 508, 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) Options: A. holding officer personally liable because he agreed to personally guarantee payment on an account B. holding company president personally liable pursuant to language in contract stating that if companys net worth is reduced in excess of ten percent 10 then it is agreed that the company president shall guarantee the shortfall C. holding that plaintiffs failure to mention vice president of thirdparty company in initial disclosures was harmless because plaintiffs mentioned president of company and defendants conducted no discovery of company D. holding company president personally liable after he gave a personal guarantee that 250000 will be paid E. holding that president of company who breached fiduciary duty in purchasing stock was properly required to pay damages rather than transfer shares back to company

assistant: The best answer is B. holding company president personally liable pursuant to language in contract stating that if companys net worth is reduced in excess of ten percent 10 then it is agreed that the company president shall guarantee the shortfall
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of 1988 Act No. 305, § 1. The 1988 version provided an exemption for “cash surrender value of life insurance in the aggregate amount of not more than fifty thousand dollars.” In 1993, the General Assembly enacted the current version of S.C.Code Ann. § 38-63-40 as part of 1992 Act No. 89, § 1, which removed the fifty thousand dollar limitation on the cash surrender value exemption and added several key provisions to the statute. Specifically, the General Assembly provided that proceeds and cash surrender values were protected “whether or not the right to change the beneficiary is reserved” and “whether or not the policy is payable to the insured if the beneficiary dies first” and added an exception in cases where “the insured has filed a petition in bankruptcy within two years of 002) (<HOLDING>); In re Henderson, 167 B.R. 67, 73 Options: A. holding that the debtorinsured was entitled to exempt the cash surrender value of her life insurance policy naming her dependent son as a beneficiary under illinois statute providing exemption for all proceeds payable because of the death of the insured and the aggregate cash value of any or all life insurance policies payable to a wife or husband of the insured or to a child parent or other person dependent upon the insured B. holding as unambiguous under iowa law the insurance policys exclusion of coverage to any obligation of the insured to indemnify another because of damages arising out of a bodily injury to any employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of his employment by the insured C. holding that a debtor in bankruptcy may claim as exempt the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy insuring the life of the debtor that is payable to a beneficiary other than the debtor under dccode ann 314716a2001 despite the absence of the term cash surrender from the statute D. holding that the tennessee statute providing an exemption for a life insurance policy made for the benefit of the insureds spouse andor children or dependent relatives allows for the exemption of the cash surrender values of such policies E. holding that where the debtor is the owner of a policy insuring his own life and listing his wife as the beneficiary upon his death the proceeds of the policy including the cash value thereof are exempt from the claims of the insureds creditors

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the debtorinsured was entitled to exempt the cash surrender value of her life insurance policy naming her dependent son as a beneficiary under illinois statute providing exemption for all proceeds payable because of the death of the insured and the aggregate cash value of any or all life insurance policies payable to a wife or husband of the insured or to a child parent or other person dependent upon the insured
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of Holdings, the Borrowers and the other Restricted Subsidiaries owns or has the right to use all Intellectual Property that is used in or otherwise necessary for the operation of their respective businesses as currently conducted, except where the failure of the foregoing would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. The operation of their respective businesses by each of Holdings, the Borrowers, and the other Restricted Subsidiaries does not infringe upon, misappropriate, violate or otherwise conflict with the Intellectual Property of any third party, except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the south driveway a sáfety hazard thereby, forcing its closure. The closing of the south driveway left the property with only one means of access. Furthermore, Northbor- ough presented evidence that its only access was rendered more hazardous to use by the reduction in the visibility of frontage road from the driveway, the reduction in turning radius, and the reduction of the throat length of the driveway. The State’s pleadings alleged 70% of Northborough’s access would be taken. See State v. Munday, 868 S.W.2d 319, 320 (Tex.1993) (taking 28.5% of property owner’s access). Moreover, unsafe access may constitute the basis for material and substantial impairment of access. See Precast Structures, Inc. v. City of Houston, 942 S.W.2d 632, 637 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ) (<HOLDING>). Here, the placement of the exit ramp forcing Options: A. holding the taking of an exit making access difficult and dangerous for trucks carrying 125foot beams materially and substantially impaired access B. holding that although prison inmates have a first amendment right to access to the courts prison officials may regulate law library access including reasonable time place and manner of access taking into account the administrative needs of the institution C. holding that damages for diminished access are not compensable as long as suitable access remains D. holding that denial of access to carbon paper and reproduction equipment and denial of facetoface access to other inmates did not deprive an inmate of his right of access to the courts E. holding that reasonable access includes general facility access without notice and patient access with twentyfour hour notice

assistant: The best answer is A. holding the taking of an exit making access difficult and dangerous for trucks carrying 125foot beams materially and substantially impaired access
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Employee shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by him in connection with the fulfillment of his duties hereunder; provided , however , that Employee has complied with all policies and procedures relating to the reimbursement of such expenses as shall, from time to time, be established by the Company. For the avoidance of doubt, the Company shall reimburse the Employee for membership dues to professional organizations, provide cellular and data coverage plan for Employee, and reasonable expenses incurred as a result of a request by the Company that the Employee relocate his primary residence, including but not limited to costs incurred to hire movers and commission paid to a home realtor to sell his current primary residence. Employee will receive relocation assistance as described in the attached Hi Crush Services LLC Relocation Policy dated January 2015, with an exception to the amount of the incidental moving allowance which will equal a one-time payment of $30,000. While the policy is pending amendment to comply with the new tax laws relative to taxation and deduction of relocation expenses, the benefits described herein will not materially change; Employee will be furnished an updated policy once it is available. Relocation benefits will be available for the 12-month period commencing October 1, 2018 and ending September 30, 2019. During the time of transition of Employee’s household from Connecticut to Houston (from April 2018 to June 2019 if needed), Employee will be provided a one (1) bedroom furnished apartment as temporary living and you will also be reimbursed for up to 3 (three) round trip air tickets per month for air travel between Houston and Connecticut for Employee or Employee’s spouse.

assistant: Expenses