flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: tripadvisor may also impose limits on certain features and services or restrict your access to all or parts of the website or any other tripadvisor web site without notice or liability for technical or security reasons , to prevent against unauthorised access , loss of , or destruction of data or where we consider in our sole discretion that you are in breach of any provision of these terms and conditions or of any law or regulation and where it decides to discontinue providing a service .

assistant: Limitation of liability, Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: her sister’s to purchase the land necessary for his real estate project in May 1971. When she discovered this use of her stock in the summer of 1971, she was furious and told Baghdady so. To mollify her, she says, Baghdady promised for the first time to make her a partner in the real estate project. Baghdady insists that he used his own money to purchase the land, and that he did not borrow the money from his sisters, available from the proceeds of the sale of the Teledyne stock, until mid-summer 1971. Given this dispute, evidence tending to show that Baghdady secured the stock sale amounts from his sisters immediately prior to the close of his land purchase cannot be characterized as “only tangentially related to the issue at hand.” Elgabri v. Lekas, 964 F.2d 1255, 1261 (1st Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). As the plaintiff explains in her brief on Options: A. holding that such a decision was within the trial courts discretion B. holding that the admission or exclusion of evidence is within discretion of the trial court and that such determinations will not be disturbed on appeal absent clear abuse of discretion C. holding the exclusion of cumulative evidence was not prejudicial error D. holding no abuse of discretion in trial courts exclusion of evidence where evidence was cumulative E. holding that the exclusion of marginally relevant evidence was within the courts discretion

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the exclusion of marginally relevant evidence was within the courts discretion
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive shall serve as General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, and shall perform such duties consistent with his position as may be assigned to him from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“CEO”) or the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). Executive shall perform his duties hereunder at the Company’s corporate offices at 400 Perimeter Center Terrace, Suite 1000, Atlanta, Georgia, 30346, subject to such reasonable amount of travel as is necessary to render the services provided hereunder.

assistant: Positions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Whenever any cash or other payment is to be made hereunder or with respect to the Restricted Stock Units, the Company or any Subsidiary shall have the power to withhold an amount (in cash, Restricted Stock Units or in Company Common Stock issuable upon settlement of Restricted Stock Units or from other amounts paid to the Participant in cash (whether under the Plan or otherwise)) sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local withholding tax requirements relating to such transaction; provided , however , that in the event that the Company withholds shares issuable to the Participant (or any portion thereof) to satisfy any applicable withholding taxes, the Company shall only withhold a number of whole shares having a Fair Market Value, determined as of the date of vesting, not in excess of the minimum of tax required to be withheld by law (or such lower amount as may be necessary to avoid liability award accounting). The Company may require the recipient of shares of Company Common Stock to remit to the Company an amount in cash sufficient to satisfy the amount of taxes required to be withheld as a condition to the issuance of shares in settlement of the Restricted Stock Units. The Committee may, in its discretion, require the Participant, or permit the Participant to elect, subject to such conditions as the Committee shall impose, to meet such obligations by having the Company withhold or sell the least number of whole shares of Company Common Stock having a Fair Market Value sufficient to satisfy all or part of the amount required to be withheld. The Company or such Subsidiary may defer the settlement of Restricted Stock Units until such withholding or other tax requirements are satisfied and if the Participant has not satisfied such withholding or other tax requirements as of the last day of the calendar year in which the Vesting Date occurs, the Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited. The Participant shall be responsible for all withholding taxes and other tax consequences of this award of Restricted Stock Units.

assistant: Tax Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company or a Subsidiary, as appropriate, may require any individual entitled to receive a payment in respect of an Award or to vest in a Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit grant to remit to the Company, prior to such payment or in connection with such vesting, an amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable tax withholding requirements. In the case of an Award payable in Shares, the Company or a Subsidiary, as appropriate, may permit such individual to satisfy, in whole or in part, such obligation to remit taxes by directing the Company to withhold Shares that would otherwise be received by such individual or to repurchase Shares that were issued to such individual to satisfy the statutory withholding rates for any applicable tax withholding purposes, in accordance with all applicable laws and pursuant to such rules as the Committee may establish from time to time. The Company or a Subsidiary, as appropriate, shall also have the right to deduct from all cash payments made to a Participant (whether or not such payment is made in connection with an Award) any applicable taxes required to be withheld with respect to such payments.

assistant: Tax Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you acknowledge and agree that if you have not paid anything to supercell during such time period , your sole remedy ( and supercell 's exclusive liability ) for any dispute with supercell is to stop using the service and to cancel your account .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Employer by which the Participant was last employed prior to his payment date under the Plan shall process and pay all Excess Retirement Benefits hereunder to or on behalf of such Participant, but such Employer’s liability shall be limited to its proportionate share of such amount, as hereinafter provided. If the Excess Retirement Benefits payable to or on behalf of a Participant are based on the Participant’s employment with more than one Employer, the liability for such Benefits shall be shared by all such Employers (by reimbursement to the Employer making such payment) as may be agreed to among them in good faith (taking into consideration the Participant’s service and Compensation paid by each such Employer) and as will permit the deduction (for purposes of federal income tax) by each such Employer of its portion of the payments made and to be made hereunder. Expenses of administering the Plan shall be paid by the Employers, as directed by the Company.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive’s right to receive any payment pursuant to Section 2(b) shall be contingent on Executive providing to the Company (and failing to revoke) a full and complete general release in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “ Release ”).

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: was either manual or ligature strangulation and the other two recommended that the manner of death be left undetermined. Further, Dr. Jordan testified that possible materials used as ligatures could be "anything ... a rope ... a telephone cord ... a scarf’ or any other object which could be "placed totally around the neck and held tightly thus producing asphyxia.” 7 . Appellant claims in his eighteenth point of error, that the evidence is insufficient to prove that death occurred during the course of a kidnapping as alleged in the indictment. We do not reach this point since we find the evidence to be sufficient to sustain allegations that appellant killed the complainant in the course of robbery. See Pinkerton v. State, 660 S.W.2d 58, 62 (Tex.Cr.App.1983) and cases cited therein (<HOLDING>). 8 . In Eddings, Justice Powell, writing for Options: A. holding that when two underlying offenses are charged in an indictment for capital murder the state need only prove one of the two offenses to support the conviction B. holding that a defendants statements regarding offenses for which he had not been charged were admissible notwithstanding the attachment of his sixth amendment right to counsel on other charged offenses C. holding these two statutes are not criminal offenses and only affect sentencing D. holding that in the conviction and sentencing for criminal offenses committed in the course of one criminal episode it is the intent of the legislature that there be a separate conviction and sentence for each criminal offense unless one of the offenses is a degree of the other a necessarily included lesser offense subsumed in the other or both offenses are identical E. holding that a defendant may not be charged with two separate offenses premised on two amounts of cocaine one found in a box and one found in a bag located in the passenger compartment of the defendants vehicle

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that when two underlying offenses are charged in an indictment for capital murder the state need only prove one of the two offenses to support the conviction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Waiver and Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of laws thereof other than Sections 5-1401 and 5-1402 of the General Obligations Law of the State of New York.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: this demonstrated jury impartiality has been rebutted. See Rolling, 695 So.2d at 286 (discussing that although not dispositive, assurances from prospective jurors that they are impartial despite their extrinsic knowledge support the presumption of a jury’s impartiality). Moreover, Overton does not and cannot contend that any of the prospective jurors who stated they could not be impartial due to their extrinsic knowledge actually entered the jury box as a member of the venire. Instead, it appears from the record that the trial court was able to obtain a jury of impartial jurors from an even greater pool of prospective jurors who confirmed that they could be impartial. Thus, there is no established prejudice that resulted from any of the pretrial publicity. See Rivera, 859 So.2d at 511 (<HOLDING>). It is reasonable to conclude that the Options: A. holding that to show prejudice in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel the petitioner must show a reasonable probability that but for counsels errors the result of the proceeding would have been different B. holding defendant did not show prejudice to support ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim because any evidentiary error was harmless C. holding that a defendant must show actual prejudice to succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim D. holding that the defendant waived the issue of change of venue where the trial court denied the motion for a change of venue without prejudice stating that it was willing to reconsider the motion at any time during the jury selection process but the defendant never renewed the motion for a change of venue E. holding that there was no ineffective assistance due to appellate counsels failure to challenge the trial courts denial of the motion to change venue because the defendant failed to show actual prejudice

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that there was no ineffective assistance due to appellate counsels failure to challenge the trial courts denial of the motion to change venue because the defendant failed to show actual prejudice
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company has filed all reports, schedules, forms, statements and other documents required to be filed by the Company under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, including pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) thereof, for the two years preceding the date hereof (or such shorter period as the Company was required by law or regulation to file such material) (the foregoing materials, including the exhibits thereto and documents incorporated by reference therein, being collectively referred to herein as the “ SEC Reports ”) on a timely basis or has received a valid extension of such time of filing and has filed any such SEC Reports prior to the expiration of any such extension, except for its Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on July 20, 2017. As of their respective dates, the SEC Reports complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as applicable, and none of the SEC Reports, when filed, contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The Company has never been an issuer subject to Rule 144(i) under the Securities Act. The financial statements of the Company included in the SEC Reports comply in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements and the rules and regulations of the Commission with respect thereto as in effect at the time of filing. Such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (“ GAAP ”), except as may be otherwise specified in such financial statements or the notes thereto and except that unaudited financial statements may not contain all footnotes required by GAAP, and fairly present in all material respects the financial position of the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of and for the dates thereof and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended, subject, in the case of unaudited statements, to normal, immaterial, year-end audit adjustments.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Employee shall be entitled to participate in those employee benefit plans and programs of Employer, to the extent Employee qualifies, pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of such plans and programs. Employee expressly understands and agrees that Employer in its sole discretion may from time to time modify, add, or terminate plans or programs made available to or offered for the benefit of the Employee and other employees of Employer.

assistant: Benefits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The provisions of this Revolving Secured Promissory Note are severable, and if any provision shall be held invalid or unenforceable in whole or in part in any jurisdiction, then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not in any manner affect such provision in any other jurisdiction or any other provision of this Revolving Secured Promissory Note in any jurisdiction.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither the Borrower nor any of its Restricted Subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of the Borrower, none of its Affiliates and none of the respective officers, directors, brokers or agents of the Borrower, such Restricted Subsidiary or such Affiliate acting or benefiting in any capacity in connection with the Loans (i) conducts any business or engages in making or receiving any contribution of funds, goods or services to or for the benefit of any Embargoed Person or in violation of any Anti-Corruption Laws, (ii) deals in, or otherwise engages in any transaction related to, any property or interests in property blocked pursuant to any Anti-Terrorism Law or (iii) engages in or conspires to engage in any transaction that evades or avoids, or has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate, any of the prohibitions set forth in any Anti-Terrorism Law.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you provide personal data including your name and job title to be included on the skype manager directory , you acknowledge that other members of that skype manager may view such data .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During and after the Executive’s employment, the Executive shall cooperate fully with the Company in the defense or prosecution of any claims or actions now in existence or which may be brought in the future against or on behalf of the Company which relate to events or occurrences that transpired while the Executive was employed by the Company. The Executive’s full cooperation in connection with such claims or actions shall include, but not be limited to, being available to meet with counsel to prepare for discovery or trial and to act as a witness on behalf of the Company at mutually convenient times. During and after the Executive’s employment, the Executive also shall cooperate fully with the Company in connection with any investigation or review of any federal, state or local regulatory authority as any such investigation or review relates to events or occurrences that transpired while the Executive was employed by the Company. The Company shall reimburse the Executive for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the Executive’s performance of obligations pursuant to this Section 5(f).

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and other communications provided for hereunder shall be in writing and shall be mailed (by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested), telecopied or delivered by hand, Federal Express or other reputable overnight courier, if to the Additional Guarantor, to it at its address set forth below its signature to this Agreement, and if to any Borrower, any Guarantor, any Lender or any Agent, to it at its address specified in the Financing Agreement or Joinder Agreement (as applicable); or as to any such Person at such other address as shall be designated by such Person in a written notice to such other Person, complying as to delivery with the terms of this Section 4. All such notices and other communications shall be effective in accordance with Section 12.01 of the Financing Agreement.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: ¶51 L&A’s reasoning is deeply flawed and should be soundly rejected by this court. First, L&A erred in reasoning that “default” must mean a material breach justifying termination rather than the failure to fulfill a contractual obligation. The subcontract itself defines “default,” and the meaning of “default” must also be read in light of the purpose of the bond, which is to guarantee the “prompt and faithful” performance of the subcontract. Obviously, a subcontract has not been promptly and faithfully performed when the principal has breached its contractual obligations, whether the breach is serious enough to justify termination or not. “[I]t is axiomatic that the very purpose of a performance bond is ‘to assure completion of the contract.’ ” U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 369 F.3d at 67 (<HOLDING>) (quoting Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co., 371 Options: A. holding that cleanup costs incurred pursuant to a consent decree were not incurred voluntarily and must be sought through a 113f contribution action B. holding that a surety has standing to sue for a progress payment released by the government after notification by the surety of unpaid subcontractors C. holding that there is no privity of contract between the government and a surety since the government is not a party to the agreement between the surety and the contractor the government never undertakes an obligation to the surety D. holding that bankruptcy court could not enter judgment for 7402564 under 107a for incurred costs when such costs had not been incurred E. holding that a surety must pay all the costs of completion not simply those incurred after a declaration of default

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a surety must pay all the costs of completion not simply those incurred after a declaration of default
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: CURIAM. In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution, we affirm without comment as to all issues except the requirement that the former husband maintain life insurance to secure his support obligations. The trial court orally pronounced this requirement, but it was not included in the written judgment as the law requires. See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 151 So.3d 27, 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we reverse and remand for the Options: A. holding that in cases of direct conflict between a courts oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment the oral pronouncement controls B. holding that written judgment controlled over oral pronouncement C. holding that a trial courts changing of the written sentence to conform with the oral pronouncement of sentence is ministerial D. holding that the failure of a written sentence to conform to the courts oral pronouncement cannot be raised in a rule 3800a motion E. holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement

assistant: The best answer is E. holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event of the death of the Executive, the Company shall pay to the estate or other legal representative of the Executive, within ninety (90) days of the Executive’s death, (i) the salary accrued to the date of the Executive’s death and not theretofore paid and (ii) any earned but unpaid Annual Bonus for the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which such termination occurs. In addition, the Company shall pay to the estate or other legal representative of the Executive a lump sum, pro rata portion of any Annual Bonus that Executive would have been entitled to receive pursuant to Section 4 for the fiscal year in which such termination occurs, based upon the percentage of the fiscal year that shall have elapsed through the date of Executive’s termination of employment, calculated on the actual performance for the fiscal year in which termination occurs (the “Pro-Rata Bonus”), payable when such Annual Bonus would have otherwise been payable had Executive’s employment not terminated. Rights and benefits of the estate or other legal representative of the Executive under the benefit plans and programs of the Company shall be determined in accordance with the terms and conditions of such plans and programs. Neither the estate nor other legal representative of the Executive nor the Company shall have any further rights or obligations under this Agreement except as provided in this Section 7.1.

assistant: Death
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any Lender may at any time, without the consent of, or notice to, Borrower or Administrative Agent, sell participations to any Person (other than a natural Person, or a holding company, investment vehicle or trust for, or owned and operated for the primary benefit of a natural Person, a Defaulting Lender or Borrower or any of Borrower’s Affiliates or Subsidiaries) (each, a “ Participant ”) in all or a portion of such Lender’s rights and/or obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and/or the Loans (including such Lender’s participations in L/C Obligations and/or Swing Line Loans) owing to it); provided that (i) such Lender’s obligations under this Agreement shall remain unchanged, (ii) such Lender shall remain solely responsible to the other parties hereto for the performance of such obligations and (iii) Borrower, Administrative Agent, the Lenders and L/C Issuer shall continue to deal solely and directly with such Lender in connection with such Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, each Lender shall be responsible for the indemnity under Section 10.05(c) without regard to the existence of any participation.

assistant: Participations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: except as otherwise described in any additional terms ( such as a contest 's official rules ) which will govern the submission of your user content , you hereby grant to linden lab , and you agree to grant to linden lab , the non-exclusive , unrestricted , unconditional , unlimited , worldwide , irrevocable , perpetual , and cost-free right and license to use , copy , record , distribute , reproduce , disclose , modify , display , publicly perform , transmit , publish , broadcast , translate , make derivative works of , and sell , re-sell or sublicense ( through multiple levels ) ( with respect to each product or otherwise on the service as permitted by you through your interactions with the service ) , and otherwise exploit in any manner whatsoever , all or any portion of your user content ( and derivative works thereof ) , for any purpose whatsoever in all formats , on or through any media , software , formula , or medium now known or hereafter developed , and with any technology or devices now known or hereafter developed , and to advertise , market , and promote the same .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive agrees that it may be impossible to assess the damages caused by Executive’s violation of this Agreement or any of its terms. Executive agrees that any threatened or actual violation of this Agreement or any of its terms will constitute immediate and irreparable injury to the Company and the Company shall have the right to enforce this Agreement and any of its provisions by injunction, specific performance or other equitable relief, without bond and without prejudice to any other rights and remedies that the Company may have for a breach or threatened breach of a material provision hereof. Executive agrees that if the Company is successful in whole or in part in any legal or equitable action against Executive under this Agreement, the Company shall be entitled to payment of all costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees.

assistant: Remedies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Every notice hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by registered or certified mail. All notices by Holder shall be directed to Allegiance Bancshares, Inc., 8847 W. Sam Houston Parkway N., Suite 200, Houston, Texas 77040, Attention: Secretary. Any notice given by the Company to Holder directed to Holder at the address on file with the Company shall be effective to bind Holder and any other person who shall acquire rights hereunder. The Company shall be under no obligation whatsoever to advise Holder of the existence, maturity or termination of any of Holder's rights hereunder and Holder shall be deemed to have familiarized himself or herself with all matters contained herein and in the Plan which may affect any of Holder's rights or privileges hereunder.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: however , publicly accessible areas of the yahoo services would not include portions of yahoo groups that are limited to members , yahoo services intended for private communication such as yahoo mail or yahoo messenger , or areas off of the yahoo network of properties such as portions of world wide web sites that are accessible via hypertext or other links but are not hosted or served by yahoo .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Grant Agreement, together with the Plan, sets forth the entire agreement between the parties with reference to the subject matter hereof, and there are no agreements, understandings, warranties, or representations, written, express, or implied, between them with respect to the Stock Unit Grant other than as set forth herein or therein, all prior agreements, promises, representations and understandings relative thereto being herein merged.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: F.3d 307, 313 (2d Cir.1999) (finding that an asylum applicant’s claim of a well-founded fear of persecution was diminished because the applicant’s mother and daughters continued to live in her native country unharmed). Contrary to Vukaj’s arguments, the fact his brothers were younger than he is, or that his father received threats after Vukaj left the country, does not establish that the IJ erred in drawing inferences from the fact that Vukaj’s brothers and father remain unharmed. Additionally, the record supports the agency’s conclusion that while political violence against supporters of the Democratic Party has not completely disappeared, it has been reduced since the Democratic Party came to power in 2005. See Hoxhallari v. Gonzales, 468 F.3d 179, 185-87 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). The agency was not compelled to accept Options: A. holding because defendant does not argue in his brief that these findings of fact are not supported by evidence in the record this court is bound by the trial courts findings of fact B. holding the findings of fact required to support an alimony award are sufficient if findings of fact have been made on the ultimate facts at issue in the case and the findings of fact show the trial court properly applied the law in the case C. holding that a reviewing court has the power to reject the findings and conclusions of the trial court where the findings are not supported by the evidence D. holding that the court should make factual findings from the record evidence as if it were conducting a trial on the record E. holding that when making findings that country conditions have changed in a country like albania which is subject to a large proportion of asylum claims the agency need not enter specific findings premised on record evidence

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that when making findings that country conditions have changed in a country like albania which is subject to a large proportion of asylum claims the agency need not enter specific findings premised on record evidence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as set forth on Schedule 3(p) or in the SEC Documents and other than the grant or exercise of stock options or any other equity securities offered pursuant to duly adopted stock or incentive compensation plans as disclosed on Schedule 3(c) or in the SEC Documents, none of the officers, directors or employees of the Company is presently a party to any transaction with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (other than for services as employees, officers and directors and reimbursement for expenses incurred on behalf of the Company), including any contract, agreement or other arrangement providing for the furnishing of services to or by, providing for rental of real or personal property to or from, or otherwise requiring payments to or from any officer, director or such employee or, to the knowledge of the Company, any corporation, partnership, trust or other entity in which any officer, director, or any such employee has a material interest or is an officer, director, trustee or general partner.

assistant: Transactions With Affiliates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall remain in effect until it is terminated by either party with thirty (30) days prior written notice. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall survive any such termination with respect to Proprietary Information that is disclosed prior to the effective date of such termination for a period of [*] from the date of termination.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: order violated his rights pursuant to Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 87 S.Ct. 616, 17 L.Ed.2d 562 (1967). Garrity holds that “the protection of the individual under the Fourteenth Amendment against coerced statements prohibits use in subsequent criminal proceedings of statements obtained [from a police officer] under threat of removal from office.” Garrity, 385 U.S. at 500, 87 S.Ct. 616. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment right protected in Garrity, however, is the privilege to be free from being compelled to communicate or otherwise provide testimony. Giving a blood or urine sample for drug testing does not violate that privilege. Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 764, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966); see also Oman v. State, 737 N.E.2d 1131, 1144 (Ind.2000) (<HOLDING>). Garrity simply has no application in this Options: A. holding that outofcourt statements by witnesses that are testimonial in nature are barred under the confrontation clause unless witnesses are unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to crossexamine them B. holding the confrontation clause applies only to testimonial statements C. holding that reports of chemical analyses were testimonial in nature and subject to the confrontation clause requirements D. holding recording of eyewitnesss inculpatory statement made in custodial interrogation testimonial in nature E. holding toxicological samples are not evidence of a testimonial nature

assistant: The best answer is E. holding toxicological samples are not evidence of a testimonial nature
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the Liens and security interests granted hereunder shall not terminate until the termination of the Purchase Agreement and the Notes and the full and complete performance and indefeasible satisfaction of all the Obligations (i) in respect of the Transaction Documents (including, without limitation, the indefeasible payment in full in cash of all such Obligations) and (ii) with respect to which claims have been asserted by the Collateral Agent/ and or Purchaser, whereupon the Secured Party shall forthwith cause to be assigned, transferred and delivered, against receipt but without any recourse, warranty or representation whatsoever, any remaining Collateral to or on the order of Debtors. The Secured Party shall also execute and deliver to Debtors upon such termination and at Debtors’ expense such UCC termination statements, certificates for terminating the liens on the Motor Vehicles (if any) and such other documentation as shall be reasonably requested by Debtors to effect the termination and release of the Liens and security interests in favor of the Secured Party affecting the Collateral.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall have the right to satisfy any obligation of the Company to withhold taxes or other amounts with respect to the Stock Units by withholding Shares otherwise deliverable to the Employee with respect to the Stock Units having a Fair Market Value equal to the statutory minimum amount of such tax or other withholdings. Furthermore, the Company may elect to deduct from any cash payment made to the Employee pursuant to this Agreement the amount of any taxes or other amounts which the Company is or will be required to withhold with respect to such cash payment.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: [Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this Agreement supersedes the provisions of any employment agreement, employment offer letter or similar agreement between the Participant and the Company with respect to the vesting schedule (including the acceleration of vesting) of the Award, and any provision in such agreement or letter which would otherwise determine the vesting schedule (including the acceleration of such vesting) of the Award shall have no force or effect with respect to the Award.] 10 Subject to the limitation on the transferability of the Performance Shares contained herein, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, legatees, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Your title will be Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and you will report to Badri Kothandaraman, President and CEO. This is a full-time exempt position located in Petaluma, CA. While you render services to the Company, you will not engage in any other employment, consulting or other business activity (whether full-time or part-time) that would create a conflict of interest with your duties to the Company. By signing this letter agreement, you confirm to the Company that while you do have a consulting BOD agreement with GCL, you have no contractual commitments or other legal obligations that would prohibit you from performing your duties for the Company. You will be covered under the company’s standard officer indemnification agreement.

assistant: Positions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: is well below the 20 year statutory maximum sentence authorized without the jury’s drug quantity findings. § 841(b)(1)(C). We have held that “Apprendi is not triggered where the defendant receives a term of imprisonment within the statutory maximum that would have applied even without the enhancing factor (such as the drug amount).” Burns, 298 F.3d at 544. In Bums, we held that Apprendi was not violated when the district court failed to require the jury to determine, beyond a reasonable doubt, the amount of crack cocaine for which the defendants were responsible because the sentence imposed on each defendant was below the twenty year sentence authorized by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). Id. (referring to defendants A. Harden, J. Harden, and Jordon); accord Serrano-Lopez, 366 F.3d at 638 (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Zidell, 323 F.3d Options: A. holding that statutory maximum is twenty years when drug quantity is not charged as element of offense and found by jury beyond a reasonable doubt B. holding apprendi inapplicable in heroin trafficking prosecution even though drug quantity not determined by the jury because district court sentenced defendant within the statutory maximum C. holding that where the indictment charged drug quantity but drug quantity was not submitted to the jury the district court erred in using drug quantity to increase the penalty beyond the twentyyear maximum of 841b1c D. holding that restitution in the full amount of each victims losses does not exceed the statutory maximum E. holding that when a defendant is sentenced to a term that does not exceed the statutory maximum allowed for an indeterminate amount of the drug involved the jurys determination of drug quantity is practically irrelevant

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that when a defendant is sentenced to a term that does not exceed the statutory maximum allowed for an indeterminate amount of the drug involved the jurys determination of drug quantity is practically irrelevant
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Following the execution of this Agreement, IWMG will permit, upon reasonable prior notice and at reasonable times, access to, and will promptly make available to the SPUD SHACK Shareholders and their duly authorized representatives for inspection, review, and photocopying, all properties, books, records, accounts, documents and other information of or relating in any way to IWMG as the SPUD SHACK Shareholders may believe necessary for each to comply with any applicable corporate, tax, securities or other law, rule or regulation (e.g. filing tax returns) or to comply with any applicable law, rule or regulation or upon demand from a governmental authority.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: is insufficient ground for diversion from the presumption set forth in Holmes. The trial court is afforded the discretion to determine whether a sufficient showing has been made to necessitate questioning by the court on whether juror exposure actually transpired. Pure conjecture that jurors might inadvertently violate admonitions not to read outside newspaper articles is insufficient to require court ex- animation of the jurors. See People v. Green, 323 Mich. 128, 35 N.W.2d 142 (1948). The Holmes presumption is sufficient to permit the trial court to deny a request to question the jury unless the court has reason to believe that such inquiry would be fruitful. See United States v. Pallais, 921 F.2d 684, 686 (7th Cir.1990); United States v. Thornton, 746 F.2d 39, 50 (D.C.Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>). IV The majority finds that the reasonable Options: A. holding that trial court not required to conduct a voir dire on counsels unsubstantiated suspicion where issue was whether jurors had overheard any part of a bench conversation B. holding that the extent to which parties may examine prospective jurors on voir dire lies within the trial judges discretion C. holding that the jurors failure to remember particular facts inquired about on voir dire and the jurors misunderstanding of voir dire questions do not constitute probable prejudice D. holding that absence of defendants from part of voir dire discussing trial publicity with prospective jurors was error under rule 43 E. holding that defendants have a right to be present at voir dire

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that trial court not required to conduct a voir dire on counsels unsubstantiated suspicion where issue was whether jurors had overheard any part of a bench conversation