flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: indicates the parties’ intention to not give the father a statutory adjustment in his child support based on his substantial time-sharing, the trial court erred in applying the adjustment in section 61.30(ll)(b), absent some substantial change in circumstances that would justify overlooking the father’s earlier waiver of his right to that statutory reduction. See Knight v. Knight, 702 So.2d 242, 243 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (noting the “well[-]established rule that when ‘the child support was based on an agreement by the parties that was subsequently incorporated into an order, a heavier burden rests on the party seeking a reduction than would otherwise be required’ ” (quoting Overbey v. Overbey, 698 So.2d 811, 814 (Fla.1997))); cf. Seiberlich v. Wolf, 859 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (<HOLDING>). The father sought the instant reduction in Options: A. holding that the court could award child support without a showing of changed circumstances where the original divorce decree awarded child support to be set after a specified time upon petition to the court B. holding there is an increased burden to modify a child support obligation based on substantial change in circumstances where an agreement is involved C. holding that in modification proceeding trial court should have adjusted child support based on substantial timesharing even though the father had earlier agreed to pay child support without such an adjustment trial court found that circumstances had changed based on fathers reduction in income D. holding that it was error for the trial court to determine the issue of child support without a child support guidelines worksheet E. holding that the trial court had erred in imposing an obligation to pay child support when clear and convincing evidence established that the husband was not the father of the child

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that in modification proceeding trial court should have adjusted child support based on substantial timesharing even though the father had earlier agreed to pay child support without such an adjustment trial court found that circumstances had changed based on fathers reduction in income
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 576 Pa. at 661, 841 A.2d at 1010. But the consequences of imposing Appellant’s duty on the public— including customers laundering bar rags in a public laundromat — based on the instant record, is less clear. Appellant has not referred us to anything in the record substantiating its bald claim that the public consequences are “modest.” Cf. Thierfelder, 617 Pa. at 337-38, 52 A.3d at 1277; Althaus, 562 Pa. at 555, 756 A.2d at 1170. We are, therefore, reluctant to render a social policy judgment and impose a Commonwealth-wide duty based solely on Appellant’s unsupported characterization of the burden on the public. Cf. Seebold, 618 Pa. at 653, 57 A.3d at 1245. We are in accord with the trial court’s holding. See Trial Ct. Op. at 9-10; see also Seebold, 618 Pa. at 650, 57 A.3d at 1243 (<HOLDING>). At best, without more, this factor does not Options: A. recognizing de novo standard of review B. recognizing that the standard of review for issues of statutory interpretation and construction is de novo C. holding that review of the denial of a motion to compel arbitration is under the de novo standard D. holding that the appellate standard of review of ineffectiveness claim is de novo E. holding that appellant was entitled to a de novo review however he was not entitled to a de novo review of an argument never raised

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing de novo standard of review
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive may not assign any of Executive’s rights or obligations hereunder without the written consent of the Company. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement by or on behalf of any of the parties hereto shall bind and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto whether so expressed or not. In connection with a Change of Control, the Company shall cause a successor to the Company to explicitly assume and agree to be bound by this Agreement and any such successor shall explicitly assume and agree to be bound by this Agreement.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Employer shall pay Employee an annual base salary of Two Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($234,400) (the “ Base Salary ”). The Base Salary shall be paid in substantially equal installments in accordance with the Employer’s compensation policies and procedures on the payroll dates established by the Employer for its senior officers.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: You acknowledge that a breach of this Severance Agreement will cause the Company immediate and irreparable harm for which the Company’s remedies at law (such as money damages) will be inadequate. The Company shall have the right, in addition to any other rights it may have, to obtain an injunction to restrain any breach or threatened breach of this Severance Agreement. Should any provision of this Severance Agreement be adjudged to any extent invalid by any competent tribunal, that provision will be deemed modified to the extent necessary to make it enforceable. The Company may contact any person with or for whom you work after your employment by the Company ends and may send that person a copy of this Severance Agreement.

assistant: Enforcements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement and in consideration of [●] [NTD: $1.50 per share] Thousand United States Dollars (US$ [●] ) (the “ Purchase Price ”) delivered by the Subscriber to the Company on the Funding Date, the Company hereby agrees to issue the Shares and the Warrant to the Subscriber on the Funding Date. The Company agrees to issue and deliver the Securities to the Subscriber free of all liens, pledges, mortgages, security interests, charges, restrictions, adverse claims or other encumbrances of any kind or nature whatsoever (“ Encumbrances ”), and Subscriber hereby agrees to accept the Securities free of all Encumbrances.

assistant: Sales
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: where the creditor lacked the required notice, once the complaint deadline passes without extension, a court can do nothing to alter the nondischargeability of a bona fide fraud claim. The other line of decisions, which includes In re Thompson, has favored allowing the debtor to reopen the case (In re Thompson, 152 B.R. at 26), at least when the debtor has acted in good faith and the creditors will not be prejudiced. See, e.g., In re Candelaria, 121 B.R. 140, 142, 144 (E.D.N.Y. 1990). Although one reason cited for allowing this is the desire for accuracy in the debtor’s schedules (In re Candelaria, 121 B.R. at 142), the idea that newly scheduled creditors should have a limited time to file section 523(c)(1) complaints is a common thread in these cases. See In re Walker, 195 B.R. at 208 (<HOLDING>); In re Maddox, 62 B.R. 510, 514 (Bankr. Options: A. holding filing of motion for reconsideration does not toll the 30day deadline for filing petition for review B. holding that the 180day filing deadline is jurisdictional and mandatory C. holding that in this context the filing deadline is tantamount to a statute of limitations D. holding that it had the power to set a 90day deadline for the filing of section 523c1 complaints in reopened cases E. holding that an agency filing deadline set forth in a regulation as a rule of administrative convenience is not jurisdictional

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that it had the power to set a 90day deadline for the filing of section 523c1 complaints in reopened cases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: in order to initiate arbitration , a claim must be filed with the aaa and the written demand for arbitration ( available at www.adr.org ) provided to the other party , as specified in the aaa rules .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: our privacy policy , which is available at https://www.oculus.com/legal/privacy-policy/ , is incorporated into these terms and sets forth how we treat data , including how we collect , use and disclose information .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except to the extent preempted by federal law, and without regard to conflict of laws principles, the laws of the State of Louisiana shall govern this Agreement in all respects, whether as to its validity, construction, capacity, performance or otherwise.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: are conclusory, and that the Court need not credit it. The Court disagrees. Although there is certainly legal significance to the alleged extension, Plaintiff is still pleading a factual assertion: that the Minister of Hacienda extended the Notes' maturity dates. 29 . This is not to say that a forum non conveniens analysis will never lend itself to interlocutory appeal. Defendants cite a number of cases in which district courts, in their discretion, determined that such an analysis was appropriate for interlocutory review. In this case, however, the Court's analysis balanced a variety of fact-intensive factors, making it difficult to isolate a concrete controlling legal issue. See In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Prod. Liab. Litig., 212 F.Supp.2d 903, 906 (S.D.Ind.2002) (<HOLDING>). 30 . At best, Defendants contend that the Options: A. holding that a court can dismiss a case under forum non conveniens before resolving any other jurisdictional issues B. holding that issue concerning forum non conveniens decision was not suitable for interlocutory appeal in part because a forum non conveniens decision is inherently factsensitive C. holding that a permissive forum selection clause containing a waiver of any claims of forum non conveniens amounts to a mandatory forum selection clause at least where the plaintiff chose the designated forum D. holding that the jones act does not preempt state law in applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens and thus state law governs E. holding that a district court may dismiss based on forum non conveniens without first addressing personal jurisdiction

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that issue concerning forum non conveniens decision was not suitable for interlocutory appeal in part because a forum non conveniens decision is inherently factsensitive
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any provision of this Agreement held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable shall not impair or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement and the effect thereof shall be confined to the provision held to be invalid or illegal.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings given in the Loan Agreement (after giving effect to this Amendment), and the rules of interpretation set forth in the Loan Agreement shall apply to this Amendment.

assistant: Definitions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: For the purpose of this Plan, notices and all other communications provided for in this Plan shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered or mailed by overnight courier or United States registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the Executive Severance Plan Administrative Committee, Adobe Systems Incorporated, 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, California 95110-2704, with a copy to the General Counsel of the Company, or to a Participant at the address set forth in the Participating Company Group’s payroll records or to such other address as either party may have furnished to the other in writing in accordance herewith, except that notice of change of address shall be effective only upon receipt.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: been substantially different, Mother may have had a stronger position, however, under these facts, Mother’s argument provides no basis for reversing the termination of parental rights and requiring the district court to order the Department to engage in reasonable efforts toward reunification of Mother and Child. We do not foreclose the possibility that in some cases where a prior termination of parental rights is pending appeal, the facts or circumstances of the case may call for delaying an aggravated circumstances determination pending the outcome of the appeal. Whether the court should make an aggravated circumstances determination and the timing of such a determination is properly left to the sound discretion of the district court. See § 32A-4-22(C); Amy B., 2003-NMCA-0.17, ¶ 14 (<HOLDING>). Despite Mother’s desire that we do so, we Options: A. recognizing district courts discretion to consider pending state charge in determining sentence B. holding that such a decision was within the trial courts discretion C. holding that while reviewing courts usually defer to discretion of trial judge in granting or denying a continuance grant of two short continuances where alien requested time to find a lawyer is an abuse of discretion D. recognizing the courts discretion to find aggravated circumstances E. recognizing that the legislature has provided circuit courts with broad openended discretion in sentencing individuals for the offenses of aggravated robbery

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing the courts discretion to find aggravated circumstances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Comply, and cause each Subsidiary thereof to comply, with the requirements of all Applicable Laws, rules, regulations, and orders of any Governmental Authority, other than laws, rules, regulations, and orders the non-compliance with which, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Personnel means any and all staﬀ, employees, directors, oﬃcers and professional advisors of a Party 4.1 A Receiving Party shall only disclose or reveal any Conﬁdential Information disclosed to it to those of its Personnel who are required in the course of their duties to receive and consider the same in so far as is necessary to fulﬁl the Purpose.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: From and after the Closing Date, the parties shall, on request, cooperate with one another by furnishing any additional information, executing and delivering any additional documents and instruments, and doing any and all such other things as may be reasonably required by the parties or their counsel to consummate or otherwise implement the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be effective as of the date hereof and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of, the parties and their respective heirs, successors, assigns, and personal representatives, as the case may be. The Executive may not assign any rights or duties under this Agreement. As used herein, the successors of the Company shall include, but not be limited to, any successor by way of merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets, or similar reorganization or change in control.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: The plaintiffs assert that the minor damage to then-home prior to the policy period is in no way related to or evidence of hidden decay. The plaintiffs contend that the decay of the interior portion of the rear wall remained hidden until the wall collapsed in October, 1996. By its terms, the Hartford homeowners policy “applies only to loss in Section 1 ... which occurs during the policy period.” Defendants’ Exhibit B, Sections I and II- — Conditions, ¶ 1 at 17 of 18. For insurance purposes, damages “occur” when they “first manifest themselves in a way that could be ascertained by reasonable diligence.” Keystone Automated Equipment v. Reliance Insurance Company, 369 Pa.Super. 472, 535 A.2d 648, 651 (1988); D’Auria v. Zurich Insurance Company, 352 Pa.Super. 231, 507 A.2d 857, 862 (1986)(<HOLDING>). This would apply even if the damage Options: A. holding that excess coverage in four policies was not triggered until primary insurer satisfied the requirements necessary to trigger the excess insurers coverage and paid the full amount of its limits B. holding the plain terms of the mortgage did not demonstrate any contractual duty on the mortgagee to procure coverage on plaintiffs property or to notify plaintiff of lapse in coverage C. holding that insurers failure to deny existence of insurance coverage under policy at issue was to admit that coverage existed D. holding that the plaintiffs asserted legal basis for coverage is irrelevant to the determination of whether the insurance policy provides coverage and instead looking to the facts underlying the claim for coverage E. holding that none of the physicians insurers had a duty to provide coverage since the effects of the negligence first manifested themselves prior to the coverage periods of any of the three policies

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that none of the physicians insurers had a duty to provide coverage since the effects of the negligence first manifested themselves prior to the coverage periods of any of the three policies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as the Committee may at any time otherwise provide, if Participant incurs a Disability (as such term is defined in the Plan) prior to the Vesting Date, then all unvested Shares subject to the Award shall become vested and nonforfeitable and payout of the Shares shall be made at the Target Award payout level (100%) as soon as practicable after the Committee determines that Participant has suffered a Disability, as provided in Section 8.

assistant: Disability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: tool and the ability to detain a person for a brief Terry-type investigation when that person runs at the sight of the police. If the police gain no additional information which would lead to probable cause, then the person should be free to go. Second, the Third District opined that the police had no reasonable suspicion that D.T.B. was engaged in any criminal activity. In fact, the police said just the opposite. Thus, the district court found that the officers were not executing any legal duty at the time the juvenile D.T.B. fled. Additionally, the Third District cited a number of other district court cases, decided prior to Wardlow, which held that flight alone was insufficient to demonstrate resisting/obstruction. See, e.g., DM. v. State, 681 So.2d 797 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (<HOLDING>); S.G.K. v. State, 657 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA Options: A. holding that a passenger in a stopped vehicle was seized when she was escorted from the car to the front of two police cars that had their overhead lights turned on separated from the driver by two officers and separated from her purse which remained in the car B. holding that passenger of stopped car who fled from police was not guilty of obstruction without violence C. holding that a passenger has standing to challenge a stops constitutionality because the passenger is seized from the moment a car is stopped D. holding police officers making a traffic stop could order passengers out of the stopped car E. holding that police officer was not justified in detaining a passenger who exited and began to walk away from a lawfully stopped vehicle absent an articulated reason as to why it was necessary to detain the passenger for the officers safety

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that passenger of stopped car who fled from police was not guilty of obstruction without violence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Guarantors waive diligence, presentment, protest, notice of dishonor, notice of default by Indemnitor, demand for payment, extension of time for payment, notice of acceptance of this Guaranty, and indulgences and notices of every kind. Guarantors waive any rights of subrogation, indemnity, reimbursement, and contribution which would otherwise be acquired by Guarantors by reason of their payment of any part of the Guaranteed Obligations.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: When any Dividend Shares are to be paid on a Dividend Date to any Holder, the Company shall (i) (A) provided that the Company’s transfer agent (the “ Transfer Agent ”) is participating in the Depository Trust Company (“ DTC ”) Fast Automated Securities Transfer Program, credit such aggregate number of Dividend Shares to which such Holder shall be entitled to such Holder’s or its designee’s balance account with DTC through its Deposit/Withdrawal at Custodian system, or (B) if the Transfer Agent is not participating in the DTC Fast Automated Securities Transfer Program, issue and deliver on the applicable Dividend Date, to the address set forth in the register maintained by the Company for such purpose pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement or to such address as specified by such Holder in writing to the Company at least two (2) Business Days prior to the applicable Dividend Date, a certificate, registered in the name of such Holder or its designee, for the number of Dividend Shares to which such Holder shall be entitled and (ii) with respect to each Dividend Date, pay to such Holder, in cash by wire transfer of immediately available funds, the amount of any Cash Dividend.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If the consideration proposed in the Proposed Transfer Notice to be paid for the Shares is in property, services or other non-cash consideration, the fair market value of the consideration shall be as determined in good faith by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. If DTV Holding cannot for any reason pay for the Shares in the same form of non-cash consideration, DTV Holding may pay the cash value equivalent thereof, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and as set forth in the Notice. The closing of the purchase of Shares by DTV Holding shall take place, and all payments from DTV Holding shall have been delivered to the Selling Stockholder, by the date specified in the Proposed Transfer Notice as the intended date of the Proposed Stockholder Transfer.

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Lender, upon execution and delivery hereof or upon executing and delivering an Assignment Agreement, as the case may be, represents and warrants as of the Closing Date or as of the applicable “Recordation Date” (as defined in the applicable Assignment Agreement) that (i) it has experience and expertise in the making of or investing in loans such as the applicable Loans; and (ii) it will make or invest in, as the case may be, its Loans for its own account in the ordinary course of its business and without a view to distribution of such Loans within the meaning of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or other federal securities laws (it being understood that, subject to the provisions of this Section 10.7(e) , the disposition of Loans or any interests therein shall at all times remain within its exclusive control).

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: defendant will incur liability; a plaintiff must still prove the other elements of negligence (breach of the duty, causation, and damages). Id. at 143 ¶ 9, 150 P.3d at 230. Here, recognizing that law enforcement officers have a duty of care when they undertake to notify next of kin of the death of a family member comports with our common law, the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 323, and also the Restatement (Third) of Torts § 47(b). It is also good public policy. ¶ 30 We have not restricted the concept of duty to circumstances recognized in the Restatement. Instead, we have looked to whether the defendant, by virtue of his undertaking, has placed himself in a unique position to prevent harm to the plaintiff. See Stanley v. McCarver, 208 Ariz. 219, 223 ¶¶ 14-15, 92 P.3d 849, 853 (2004) (<HOLDING>). But even § 323, at least as interpreted by Options: A. recognizing a public policy against discrimination but not providing for an independent cause of action B. holding that the restrictive covenants at issue are unenforceable as a matter of public policy C. recognizing cases where courts have considered the restatement approach as persuasive but declined to clearly articulate a rule adopting the restatement approach regarding restatement third of property mortgages 76 1997 D. recognizing that some police records must remain secret and free from public inspection as a matter of public policy E. holding that duty existed as a matter of public policy independent of the restatement

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that duty existed as a matter of public policy independent of the restatement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No failure on the part of the Collateral Agent or any other Secured Party to exercise and no delay by any such Person in exercising, and no course of dealing with respect to, any right, remedy, power or privilege under any of the Note Documents shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, remedy power or privilege under any of the Note Documents preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy, power or privilege. The rights, remedies, powers and privileges provided herein are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights, remedies, powers and privileges provided by law. The exercise by the Collateral Agent of any one or more of the rights, powers and remedies herein shall not be construed as a waiver of any other rights, powers and remedies, including, without limitation, any rights of set-off.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: tinder does not represent or warrant that ( a ) the service will be uninterrupted , secure or error free , ( b ) any defects or errors in the service will be corrected , or ( c ) that any content or information you obtain on or through the services will be accurate .

assistant: Limitation of liability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: brought.” (emphasis added). Hence, it plainly authorizes only the transfer of an entire lawsuit. In re Flight Transp. Corp. Sec. Litig., 764 F.2d 515, 516 (8th Cir.1985) (§ 1404(a) “contemplates a plenary transfer”); see also Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc., 928 F.2d 1509, 1518 (10th Cir.1991) (“Section 1404(a) only authorizes the transfer of an entire action, not individual claims.”). To accomplish what DuPont and Huntsman seek, therefore, the Court must proceed in two steps. First, it must sever the claims against these Defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, creating entirely new civil actions against them, and only then may it transfer the severed civil actions pursuant to § 1404(a). See Toro Co. v. Alsop, 565 F.2d 998, 1000 (8th Cir.1977) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). But while the second step of this process — § Options: A. holding that the rule 21 severance rendered the district court verdict a final and appealable judgment under 28 usc 1291 B. recognizing rule C. holding the indemnification claims to be severable under rule 21 from the primary liability inquiry D. recognizing district court application of the same rule E. recognizing propriety of district court severing claims under rule 21 and then transferring them under 1404a

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing propriety of district court severing claims under rule 21 and then transferring them under 1404a
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Capitalized terms used but not defined herein (including in the preamble and recitals hereto) shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement. The principles of interpretation set forth in Section 1.03 of the Credit Agreement also apply to this Amendment No. 1.

assistant: Defined Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(10), is “deemed to be a citizen of the State where it has its principal place of business and the State under whose laws it is organized.” Concluding that Express Check has its principal place of business in South Carolina, the court found that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the action. Express Check filed a petition for permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c), and we granted the petition by order dated December 22, 2009. II Express Check contends that, as a limited liability company, its citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction should be determined under traditional rules by looking to the citizenship of its sole member, QC Financial Services. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 110 S.Ct. 1015, 108 L.Ed.2d 157 (1990) (<HOLDING>); Gen. Tech. Applications, Inc. v. Exro Ltda, Options: A. holding that although the question of diversity jurisdiction is distinct from that of immunity the analysis of citizenship determinations for eleventh amendment immunity and diversity jurisdiction are the same B. holding that a limited liability companys citizenship is that of its members C. holding that defective allegations of citizenship may be amended to establish diversity jurisdiction D. holding that a limited partnership is not itself a citizen and that courts must instead look to the citizenship of its members to determine if diversity jurisdiction exists E. holding that for diversity purposes the citizenship of a llc is determined by the citizenship of all of its members

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a limited partnership is not itself a citizen and that courts must instead look to the citizenship of its members to determine if diversity jurisdiction exists
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and whether its failure to do so violates the automatic stay or confirmation order. When presented with this issue in a prior case, I found that surrender under a Chapter 13 plan does not require the creditor to take affirmative action to foreclose on property and failure to do so does not violate the automatic stay. In re Arse-nault, 456 B.R. 627, 630 (Bankr.S.D.Ga. 2011) affd Arsenault v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Civ. Action No. CV 311-106 (S.D.Ga. August 30, 2012); see also Pratt v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 462 F.3d 14, 19 (1st Cir.2006) (“[Njothing in subsection 521(a)(2) remotely suggests that the secured creditor is required to accept possession .... ”); In re Canning, 442 B.R. 165, 172 (Bankr.D.Me.2011); In re Service, 155 B.R. 512, 514-15 (Bankr.E.D.Mo.1993) (<HOLDING>); Hon. W. Homer Drake, Jr., Hon. Paul W. Options: A. holding that a patent attorneys argument did not clearly and unmistakably surrender the subject matter B. holding that a debtor in bankruptcy may claim as exempt the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy insuring the life of the debtor that is payable to a beneficiary other than the debtor under dccode ann 314716a2001 despite the absence of the term cash surrender from the statute C. holding that the consent of both parties is required to annul their contract D. holding that as a general rule affirmative action by the creditor must be taken to make it known to the debtor that the creditor has exercised his option to accelerate E. recognizing surrender as a contractual act but only with the consent of both parties requiring surrender by the debtor and willing acceptance of title by the creditor

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing surrender as a contractual act but only with the consent of both parties requiring surrender by the debtor and willing acceptance of title by the creditor
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and In re Comer, 716 F.2d 168 (3d Cir.1983), the challenged order of the district court does not fully adjudicate a specific adversary proceeding between the parties. To the contrary, the district court’s ruling that the bankruptcy court’s September 30, 1993 disbursement order was a “money judgment,” and not a mandatory injunction, ensured continuation of the controversy, i.e., preserving the issue of whether the Government is entitled to set off the $8.36 million now in the registry account against the claims of the Government agencies. Even under the most relaxed concept of finality, the October 19, 1993 order of the district court granting the Government a Rule 62(d) stay pending appeal cannot be viewed as the equivalent of a final order. Compare In re Amatex Corp., 755 F.2d at 1041 (<HOLDING>). An order granting a stay pending appeal is Options: A. holding that where an adversary proceeding continues the order is no more a final decision than an order denying summary judgment or denying a request for additional discovery the litigation proceeds and the issue will be reviewed if it turns out to make a difference to an order that is independently appealable B. holding that a bankruptcy court order denying a trustees claim to immunity was final and appealable under the collateral order doctrine C. holding that an order denying a motion to vacate a 1782 order and denying a motion to quash the subpoena was immediately appealable D. recognizing that an order denying a motion to modify a family court order where the motion is based on changed factual or legal circumstances is appealable as a special order after final judgment E. holding that order denying representation to class of future claimants in bankruptcy proceeding is equivalent to denial of request to intervene and order denying right to intervene is appealable final order

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that order denying representation to class of future claimants in bankruptcy proceeding is equivalent to denial of request to intervene and order denying right to intervene is appealable final order
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Loan Party and its Subsidiaries have filed all Federal, state and other material tax returns and reports required to be filed, and have paid all Federal, state and other material taxes, assessments, fees and other governmental charges levied or imposed upon them or their properties, income or assets otherwise due and payable, except those taxes which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted and for which adequate reserves have been provided in accordance with GAAP. There is no proposed tax assessment against any Loan Party or any Subsidiary that would, if made, have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither any Loan Party nor any Subsidiary thereof is party to any tax sharing agreement.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions to closing set forth herein, the purchase and sale of Notes, in the amounts and to the Investors listed on Schedule A attached hereto shall take place at the offices of counsel to the Purchasers, Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner LLP at 61 Broadway, New York, NY 10006 or such other location as the parties shall mutually agree, at 10:00 A.M., Eastern Standard Time, on June 29, 2017, or at such other time and place as the Company and the Investors mutually agree upon orally or in writing (which time and place are designated as the “ Closing ”). Each Purchaser shall deliver to the Company, via wire transfer with immediately available funds, an amount equal to the Subscription Amount applicable to the Closing as set forth on the signature page hereto executed by each such Purchaser and the Company and the Purchasers shall deliver the other items set forth in Section 2.2 deliverable at the Closing. Upon receipt of the funds, the Company shall deliver to the respective purchasers the Note, as determined pursuant to Section 2.2 .

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: provides that each class must accept the plan or be unimpaired. The plan may still be confirmed over the dissent of one or more classes of impaired creditors if the plan complies with all requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a) and the cramdown standard set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b). In addition to the considerations of objections raised by parties in interest, this Court has a mandatory independent duty to determine whether the plan has met all of the requirements of confirmation. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S. 260, 130 S.Ct. 1367, 1381, 176 L.Ed.2d 158 (2010) (stating that bankruptcy court has obligation to ensure Chapter 13 plan complies with the Code even if the creditor fails to object); Burnett v. Burnett (In re Burnett), 646 F.3d 575, 581 (8th Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. Hibernia Nat’l Bank (Matter of Options: A. recognizing that bankruptcy court preconfirmation bears an independent duty to assure compliance with title 11 even if no objection is lodged B. holding that section 105a facilitates compliance with the bankruptcy code and the bankruptcy courts orders and compliance is one of the central goals of civil contempt sanctions C. holding that an employer through its employees did not breach an independent duty to power company not to come in contact with power companys transmission lines because such a duty is a general duty not an independent one D. holding that bankruptcy court has discretionary power pursuant to 11 usc 105a to order preconfirmation plan payments in a chapter 12 proceeding E. holding that all core proceedings necessarily arise under title 11 or arise in a title 11 case

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing that bankruptcy court preconfirmation bears an independent duty to assure compliance with title 11 even if no objection is lodged
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of Student Affairs at the University of Virginia and the Office of the Dean of Students at Virginia Polytechnic Institute qualify for designation as voter registration agencies under § 1973gg-5(a)(2)(B). We are not in a position to order any relief with respect to the DSS office at George Mason University. The DSS office is an “office” for NVRA purposes because its function is to assist disabled students. It is not clear, however, whether the office is state funded because it is financed with student activity fees and not appropriated funds. Student activity fees may be considered a source of state funding if the monies generated by those fees are controlled by the college. See, e.g., Student Gov’t Assoc. v. Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Mass., 868 F.2d 473, 478 (1st Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). If, however, the fees are not subject to Options: A. holding state university is not a person under 1983 B. holding student activity fees not to be state funds when they were segregated from university funds and the state treasury C. holding constitutional the granting of student activity funds to the campus newspaper D. holding that student activity fees collected under authority of state law and disbursed at direction of board of trustees are university funds E. holding that the csu board of trustees and individual trustees sued in their official capacity are a political arm of the state and as such are immune from suit

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that student activity fees collected under authority of state law and disbursed at direction of board of trustees are university funds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The representations and warranties of the Company contained in this Agreement (a) that are not qualified by “materiality” or “Material Adverse Effect” shall have been true and correct in all material respects when made and shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the applicable Fixed Request Exercise Date with the same force and effect as if made on such date, except to the extent such representations and warranties are as of another date, in which case, such representations and warranties shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such other date and (b) that are qualified by “materiality” or “Material Adverse Effect” shall have been true and correct when made and shall be true and correct as of the applicable Fixed Request Exercise Date with the same force and effect as if made on such date, except to the extent such representations and warranties are as of another date, in which case, such representations and warranties shall be true and correct as of such other date.

assistant: Warranties