flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of Agent, Lenders, each Credit Party and each of their Related Persons, is authorized (but not required) to transmit, post or otherwise make or communicate, in its sole discretion, Electronic Transmissions in connection with any Loan Document and the transactions contemplated therein for routine communications; however Electric Transmissions may not be used as effective notice under the Loan Documents. Each Credit Party and each Secured Party hereto acknowledges and agrees that the use of Electronic Transmissions is not necessarily secure and that there are risks associated with such use, including risks of interception, disclosure and abuse and each indicates it assumes and accepts such risks by hereby authorizing the transmission of Electronic Transmissions.

assistant: Authorizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: A nomination of Product by Producer shall be deemed a warranty of title to such Product by Producer or a warranty that Producer Controls the Product and has the right to deliver such Product for gathering under this Agreement, as applicable. Title to Product shall not transfer to Gatherer by reason of Gatherer’s performance of the Services. By nominating Product, Producer also agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Gatherer harmless from any and all Losses resulting from any claims by a Third Party of title or rights to such Product. If any claim is made challenging Producer’s right to deliver such Product to Gatherer, then Gatherer shall have the right to suspend receipt of deliveries of such Product hereunder until such claim is finally resolved to the reasonable satisfaction of Gatherer.

assistant: Titles
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event the DEA requires additional information (including, but not limited to, purchase orders) in order to grant a sufficient Quota, Client and Halo agree to cooperate in good faith to obtain such Quota to enable manufacture of the Product. If Halo has notified Client of a shortfall in Quota, Client shall not issue Purchase Orders for a Product in excess of the DEA-approved Quota without Halo’s consent. Halo and Client shall meet to discuss and agree in good faith on adjustments to the Forecast and/or Purchase Orders as a result of the DEA-approved Quota for a Product.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: warrant may issue without “probable cause” supported by “oath or affirmation” because parolees are subject to lesser or no Fourth Amendment protections. We disagree. Although, while on supervised release, Vargas was subject to lesser Fourth Amendment protection, he was nonetheless protected by the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 122, 122 S.Ct. 587, 151 L.Ed.2d 497 (2001); Latta v. Fitzharris, 521 F.2d 246, 248 (9th Cir.1975) (“It is thus too late in the day to assert that searches of parolees by then-parole officers present no Fourth Amendment issues.”). The cases dealing with lesser Fourth Amendment protection are generally concerned with which searches and seizures are reasonable without a warrant. See e.g., Knights, 534 U.S. at 122, 122 S.Ct. 587 (<HOLDING>). The cases do not address whether a warrant Options: A. holding warrantless search of probationers home by law enforcement officer for investigatory purposes was reasonable when conditions of probation included a search term and search was supported by reasonable suspicion B. holding unanimously that a warrantless search of a probationers apartment that was supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized as a condition of his probation was reasonable within the meaning of the fourth amendment C. holding that the warrantless search of knights supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation was reasonable within the meaning of the fourth amendment D. holding a warrantless probation search condition that is reasonably related to a probationers rehabilitation is a valid limitation to a defendants fourth amendment rights E. holding that warrantless search as probation condition was a valid limitation to the defendants fourth amendment rights when defendant asserted the condition was not reasonably related to rehabilitation

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the warrantless search of knights supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation was reasonable within the meaning of the fourth amendment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notices, demands, requests and consents permitted or required hereunder or under any other Loan Document shall be in writing, may be delivered personally or sent by certified mail with postage prepaid or by reputable courier service with charges prepaid. Any notice or demand sent to Grantor by certified mail or reputable courier service shall be addressed to Grantor at c/o Carroll Organization, 3340 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 2250, Atlanta, GA, 30326, Attn: Eddy Chan, together with a required copy c/o Bluerock Real Estate, LLC, 712 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10019, Attn: Jordon Ruddy and Michael Konig, Esq., or such other address in the United States of America as Grantor shall designate in a notice to Beneficiary given in the manner described herein. Any notice sent to Beneficiary by certified mail or reputable courier service shall be addressed to The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company to the attention of the Real Estate Investment Department at 720 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53202, or at such other addresses as Beneficiary shall designate in a notice given in the manner described herein. Any notice given to Beneficiary shall refer to the Loan No. set forth above. Any notice or demand hereunder shall be deemed given when received. Any notice or demand which is rejected, the acceptance of delivery of which is refused or which is incapable of being delivered during normal business hours at the address specified herein or such other address designated pursuant hereto shall be deemed received as of the date of attempted delivery.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If Employee's employment with the Company or a Subsidiary terminates for any rea so n before his or her interest in all of the Units have become vested and nonforfeitable under this § 3, after including any vesting under the Special Vesting Rules as described in this Section 3(b), then Employee shall forfeit all Units which have not become so vested a nd nonforfeitable before the date his or h e r employment so terminates.

assistant: Forfeitures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Buyer represents that he has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by Buyer, and upon the execution and delivery by Seller of this Agreement and the performance by Seller of its obligations herein, will constitute, a legal, valid and binding obligation of Buyer enforceable against Buyer in accordance with its terms, except as such enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy or insolvency laws or other laws affecting enforcement of creditors’ rights or by general principles of equity.

assistant: Authority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: omitted). 27 . Id. at 1261 (Bryner, C.J., concurring). 28 . Id. at 1256. 29 . Id. 30 . Id. 31 . Id. 32 . Id. at 1256-57. 33 . Id. at 1257. 34 . Id. 35 . Id. at 1261 (Bryner, C.J., concurring). 36 . 599 P.2d 727 (Alaska 1979). 37 . Id. at 738. 38 . Id. at 730. 39 . Id. at 739. See also Newhall, 843 P.2d at 1260 & n. 4 ("'It is possible that in deciding [Reevesl] the supreme court was influenced by the fact that a 'balloon could be one of those rare single-purpose containers which by their very nature cannot support any reasonable expectation of privacy because their contents can be inferred from their outward appearance. ") (quoting Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 750-51, 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1548, 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring)). 40 . 809 P.2d 421, 423 (Alaska App.1991) (<HOLDING>). MANNHEIMER, Judge, concurring. I agree with Options: A. holding that the search of a balloon was justified under the plain view exception where the contraband nature of the balloon was immediately apparent to the officer who seized it B. holding that even if an officers stop of a defendant who was on foot was unlawful the search of a parked car was justified by a different officer observing a gun magazine in plain view in the car C. holding that the incriminating nature of an item was immediately apparent where the police officers had probable cause to believe that it contained evidence of a crime D. holding that the criminality of a knotted opaque party balloon found in plain view during a traffic stop was immediately apparent because the officer had probable cause to believe that the balloon contained an illegal substance E. holding that the fourth amendment permits seizure of property in plain view where 1 the officer has a lawful right to access the object itself and 2 the propertys incriminating character is immediately apparent

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the search of a balloon was justified under the plain view exception where the contraband nature of the balloon was immediately apparent to the officer who seized it
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower shall give notice, or cause notice to be given, to Lender, promptly upon the occurrence of (a) any event of default (beyond any applicable notice and cure periods contained therein) on the part of Mezzanine A Borrower, Mezzanine A Leasehold Pledgor, any Individual Owner, any Operating Lessee, any SPC Party or any Leasehold Pledgor, under any Major Contract or on the part of Borrower under any Contractual Obligation (if any), or (b) Borrower obtaining knowledge of any default under any Major Contract or Contractual Obligation (if any) that would reasonably be expected to have an to have a material adverse effect on the applicable Individual Property or the use or operation thereof or on Borrower, any Leasehold Pledgor, Mezzanine A Borrower, Mezzanine A Leasehold Pledgor, any Individual Owner, any Operating Lessee or any SPC Party.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: A.2d 35, 36 (Me.1991) (“the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify”), citing Merrimack, 534 A.2d at 354. Except in limited circumstances, we have held that an insurer cannot avoid its duty to defend by establishing, before the underlying action has concluded, that ultimately there will be no duty to indemnify. In determining the duty to defend, regard less of when that ruling is made, the court’s consideration is limited to the underlying complaint and the insurance policy. Cumberland Cold Storage, 373 A.2d at 249. Even when evidence could conclusively establish the absence of a duty to indemnify, ordinarily that evidence is irrelevant to the determination of the duty to defend. See Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Maine Teachers Association, 449 A.2d 358, 360-61 (Me.1982) (<HOLDING>). Given the unusual procedural posture of this Options: A. holding that in determining whether a state officer is entitled to qualified immunity for 1983 purposes courts may not consider whether the constitutional right was clearly established before determining first that a constitutional right was violated B. holding that an adjudication on summary judgment is an adjudication on the merits C. holding that as a general rule an issue raised initially in a reply brief will not be considered on appeal D. holding that facts established in underlying administrative adjudication could not be considered in determining whether there was initially a duty to defend E. holding that the court cannot examine the underlying merits of the claims in determining whether to certify a class

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that facts established in underlying administrative adjudication could not be considered in determining whether there was initially a duty to defend
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices, amendments, waivers, consents and other communications provided to any party hereto under this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed, delivered or transmitted to such party at its address, or e-mail address set forth on Schedule II, in the case of the Issuer or the Manager, or on Schedule II , in the case of the Lender Parties, the Administrative Agent and the Funding Agents, or in each case at such other address or e-mail address as may be designated by such party in a notice to the other parties. Any notice, if mailed and properly addressed with postage prepaid or if properly addressed and sent by pre-paid courier service, shall be deemed given when received; any notice, if transmitted by e-mail, shall be deemed given when received.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Supplement H-1 Participant became a Participant in the Plan on the Merger Date and shall continue as a Participant in the Plan until all of the Participant’s vested account balances are distributed, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Supplement H-1.

assistant: Participations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Awards may be granted on the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 6 . Awards granted under the Plan may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with any other Award. In addition, the Committee may impose on any Award or the exercise thereof, at the date of grant or thereafter (subject to Section 10 ), such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall determine.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Finance Parties agree that this Agreement may be enforced only by the action of the Administrative Agent acting upon the instructions of the Required Lenders as set forth in the Credit Agreement and that no other Finance Party shall have any right individually to seek to enforce this Agreement, it being understood and agreed that such rights and remedies may be exercised by the Administrative Agent for the benefit of the Finance Parties upon the terms of this Agreement and the Credit Agreement.

assistant: Enforcements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In case any one or more Events of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, and whether or not the Lenders shall have accelerated the maturity of the Loans pursuant to §10.2, the Agent, on behalf of the Lenders may, and upon the direction of the Majority Lenders, shall proceed to protect and enforce their rights and remedies under this Agreement, the Notes and/or any of the other Loan Documents by suit in equity, action at law or other appropriate proceeding, including to the full extent permitted by applicable law the specific performance of any covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement and the other Loan Documents, the obtaining of the ex parte appointment of a receiver, and, if any amount shall have become due, by declaration or otherwise, the enforcement of the payment thereof. No remedy herein conferred upon the Agent or the holder of any Note is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each and every remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or any other provision of law. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement providing that the Loans may be evidenced by multiple Notes in favor of the Lenders, the Lenders acknowledge and agree that only the Agent may exercise any remedies arising by reason of a Default or Event of Default. If the Borrower or the Guarantors fail to perform any agreement or covenant contained in this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents beyond any applicable period for notice and cure, Agent may itself perform, or cause to be performed, any agreement or covenant of such Person contained in this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents which such Person shall fail to perform, and the out-of-pocket costs of such performance, together with any reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees actually incurred (including attorneys’ fees incurred in any appeal) by Agent in connection therewith, shall be payable by the Borrower and/or the Guarantors upon demand and shall constitute a part of the Obligations and shall if not paid within five (5) days after demand bear interest at the Default Rate. In the event that all or any portion of the Obligations is collected by or through an attorney-at-law, the Borrower and the Guarantors shall pay all costs of collection including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees.

assistant: Remedies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to Paragraph 17(a), all Disputes will be submitted for binding arbitration pursuant to the rules of the Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act on demand of either party . Such arbitration proceeding will be conducted in Wichita, Kansas and , except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, will be heard by one ( 1) arbitrator in accordance with the rules of the Kansas Uniform Arbitration Act then in effect. The arbitrator will have the right to award or include in his award any relief which he or she deems proper under the circumstances, including , without limitation , money damages (with interest on unpaid amounts from the date due) , specific performance , injunctive relief , and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs , provided that the arbitrator will not have the right to amend or modify the terms of this Agreement. The award and decision of the arbitrator will be conclusive and binding upon all parties hereto , and judgment upon the award may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. Except as specified above , the Company and the Executive shall pay their respective attorneys' fees and other costs associated with the arbitration, and the Company and the Executive shall equally bear the costs and fees of the arbitrator.

assistant: Arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: with the authority to delegate the task of soliciting and marketing its mortgage products to exclusive agents. It is undisputed that State Farm Bank’s exclusive agents are subject to regulation and oversight by the OTS. According to 12 U.S.C. § 1464(d)(7)(D), “if a savings association ... causes to be performed for itself, by contract or otherwise, any service authorized under this chapter ... (i) such performance shall be subject to regulation and examination by the [OTS] to the same extent as if such services were being performed by the savings association on its own premises.” Additionally, 12 U.S.C. § 1464(d)(l)(B)(ii) requires that a federal savings association provide the OTS with “prompt and complete access” to its agents for regulatory purposes. See also Ayotte, 488 F.3d at 535 (<HOLDING>). Having concluded that State Farm Bank Options: A. holding that states may exercise their supervisory power to take custody of bank savings deposits B. recognizing that the hola and the ots permit federal savings associations to delegate their banking power to thirdparty agents C. recognizing that state constitution imposes more stringent limitations on power of state to inquire into lawful associations and speech than those imposed by federal constitution D. recognizing a distinction between the power of a federal court to hear statelaw claims and the discretionary exercise of that power E. holding that the federal power act did not evince an intent to permit states to prohibit export of hydroelectric power out of state

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that the hola and the ots permit federal savings associations to delegate their banking power to thirdparty agents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: At the Company’s election you shall either (i) be given notice to terminate your employment pursuant to Clause 14 of your Employment Contract, or (ii) be paid in lieu of notice of £………… less legally required deductions pursuant to Clause 14.3 of your Employment Contract in a timely manner, or (iii) be placed on garden leave during your notice period pursuant to Clause 14.7 of your Employment Contract.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: or “plain error” exists. See, e.g., State v. Brown, 853 P.2d 851, 853-54 (Utah 1992); State v. Gibbons, 740 P.2d 1309, 1311 (Utah 1987); State v. Steggell, 660 P.2d 252, 254 (Utah 1983). In the present case, or in any similar case, the only way that a defendant could challenge the constitutionality of section 78 — 3—31(6)(a) would be first to consent to a hearing by a commissioner and then to challenge the validity of that very consent. Such a procedure would likely be futile inasmuch as it would invariably result in the withdrawal of the consent, either by the defendant or by court order. Indeed, absent the approach taken by Ohms, it is unlikely that section 78-3-31(6)(a) would ever be subject to constitutional scrutiny. This is precisely the sort of exceptional circu Ct.App.1990) (<HOLDING>). For example, a legislator cannot appoint Options: A. holding that utah const art vi 1 limits legislatures ability to delegate legislative powers or functions to others B. holding that the governor of new york has only those powers delegated to him by the state constitution and the statutes C. holding that the contact clause reaches every form in which the legislative power of a state is exerted whether it be a constitution a constitutional amendment an enactment of the legislature a bylaw or ordinance of a municipal corporation or a regulation or order of some other instrumentality of the state exercising delegated legislative authority D. holding that crime definition and penalty powers are essential legislative functions that cannot constitutionally be delegated by the utah legislature to any other person or body E. holding that legislative functions such as powers of zoning and rezoning cannot be delegated

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that crime definition and penalty powers are essential legislative functions that cannot constitutionally be delegated by the utah legislature to any other person or body
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be amended or modified at any time by an instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto, and as provided in the Plan, under certain circumstances, the Agreement may be amended or terminated by the Company or the Board without the Participant’s consent.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 844 (6th Cir.1996). In that case, we held that a party seeking to vacate an arbitral award was limited to raising the exclusive grounds found in Article V of the Convention because the FAA does not apply to cases under the Convention if the FAA is “in conflict” with the Convention or its implementing legislation. Id. at 851; see also 9 U.S.C. 208. Unlike the award in M & C Corp., which had been made in the United Kingdom, see id. at 846, the award in this case was made in the United States, and therefore Article V(l)(e) authorizes this court to consider our domestic law, as it is the law where the award was made. Therefore, the FAA and the Convention do not conflict in this case. 9 . An arbitration award can fall under both the Convention and the FAA. See Lander Co., 107 F.3d at 481 (<HOLDING>); Bergesen, 710 F.2d at 934 (“There is no Options: A. holding that both faa and taa applied where contracts stated they shall be governed by the law of the place where the project is located B. holding that where an ambiguity exists in fact or by construction it is proper to consider the history of the legislation C. holding that the term commerce in the faa is to be broadly construed D. holding that a dispute is governed by both the convention and the faa because nothing in the convention or its history or in the implementing legislation or its history suggests exclusivity from the faa E. holding a court may consider a defendants criminal history even if that history is included in the defendants criminal history category

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a dispute is governed by both the convention and the faa because nothing in the convention or its history or in the implementing legislation or its history suggests exclusivity from the faa
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) This Agreement shall govern the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company, effective at the Closing (as defined in the Merger Agreement, and the date of the Closing, the “ Effective Date ”); provided that this Agreement shall automatically terminate and shall have no force or effect if (i) Executive’s employment terminates for any reason prior to the Effective Date or (ii) the Merger Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms and the Closing does not occur. Effective as of and following the transition of Executive’s employment to the Employing Subsidiary, all references herein to the Company and Executive’s employment with the Company shall instead refer to the Employing Subsidiary and Executive’s employment with the Employing Subsidiary. As of the Effective Date, the Prior Agreement shall terminate and be of no force and effect; provided that the Prior Agreement shall continue to govern the parties’ rights and obligations through the Effective Date and any of Executive’s covenants contained in the Prior Agreement that by their terms are intended to survive the termination of the Prior Agreement shall so survive in accordance with their terms, in each case with the Effective Date being deemed to be the last day of the Employment Period as such term is defined and used in the Prior Agreement.

assistant: Employment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: matters there was a duty to report, excluding, however, in criminal cases matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel.” Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)(B). We find that the warrants of deportation in this case consisted of a “routine, objective, cataloging of [ ] unambiguous factual matter[s].” United States v. Bahena-Cardenas, 411 F.3d 1067, 1074-75 (9th Cir. 2005). Additionally, the warrants and the notations on the back pages have “none of the features of the subjective report made by a law enforcement official in an on-the-scene investigation, which investigative reports lack sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness because they are made in an adversary setting and likely to be used in litigation.” United States v. Hernandez-Rojas, 617 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1980) (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Agustino-Hernandez, Options: A. holding exception set forth in rule 8038b was inapplicable to warrant of deportation where notation that alien was deported was ministerial objective observation with inherent reliability because of the governments need to keep accurate records of the movement of aliens B. holding that under permanent rules of hrira the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over claims of aliens ordered deported for crimes listed in ina and holding that district courts retain habeas jurisdiction over deportation orders of criminal aliens C. holding that warrant of deportation is admissible hearsay under fed revid 8038b to prove defendant was deported D. holding that records referring to defendant as escaped prisoner and escape risk were not admissible because exception for public records rule 8038b specifically excluded them as records of law enforcement personnel further holding that specific exclusion controlled over businessrecord hearsay exception rule 8036 E. holding that the warrant of removal warning to alien ordered deported and order from the immigration judge were nontestimonial

assistant: The best answer is A. holding exception set forth in rule 8038b was inapplicable to warrant of deportation where notation that alien was deported was ministerial objective observation with inherent reliability because of the governments need to keep accurate records of the movement of aliens
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any part of this Agreement is construed to be in violation of any law, such part shall be modified to achieve the objective of the parties to the fullest extent permitted by law and the balance of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that the three-day extension provided under Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(e) and referenced in Local Rule 6.1 applies only to time periods in which “a party must or may act within a prescribed period after service.” And since the thirty-day time period for filing a bill of costs is a period that begins to run “after the entry of judgment,” N.D. Ga. R. 54.1 (emphasis added), the three-day extension is unavailable. In other words, she says, since judgments are not subject to “service,” Fed. R.Civ.P. 6(e) and (accordingly) Local Rule 6.1 do not apply. Pope’s interpretation of these rules seems reasonable to us, and it may even be the interpretation we would follow were we to decide the issue in the first instance. See, e.g., Cavaliere v. Allstate Ins. Co., 996 F.2d 1111, 1113-14 (11th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). The problem with her argument, however, is Options: A. holding that the oneyear period begins to run after the time for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari has expired B. holding that rule 6e is inapplicable where the time for filing begins to run on the date of mailing C. holding that the threeday grace period in fed rcivp 6e does not apply to motions for a new trial under fedrcivp 59 in part because the time period for filing those motions begins to run from entry of judgment D. holding that limitation period begins to run at the time of the breach E. holding that although the defendant filed a number of motions because the original trial date never changed as a result of those motions no delay could be attributed to the motions

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the threeday grace period in fed rcivp 6e does not apply to motions for a new trial under fedrcivp 59 in part because the time period for filing those motions begins to run from entry of judgment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (2) he claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action in his absence may (i) as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest or (ii) leave any of the persons already parties subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations by reason of his claimed interest. If he has not been so joined, the court shall order that he be made a party. If he should join as a plaintiff but refuses to do so, he may be made a defendant, or, in a proper case, an involuntary plaintiff. Tex.R. Civ. P. 39(a); g that it was error for the trial court not to join non-party lessors who had a financial interest in the leases and pooling agreement); Longoria, 255 S.W.3d at 183 (<HOLDING>); Tex. Oil & Gas Corp. v. Ostrom, 638 S.W.2d Options: A. holding trial court has discretion to require joinder of royalty interest owners whose interests will be directly and possibly adversely affected by decree in trespass to try title action B. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding violation was willful and substantial C. holding that the trial court did not err in denying a plea in abatement to obtain joinder of other royalty owners in a pooled unit on grounds that the presence of the other royalty owners was not necessary to determine whether sabre pooled in bad faith and breached the terms of the lease D. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to require joinder of owners of nonpossessory royalty interests and possibilities of reverter in partition suit between owners of mineral leasehold estate although it would be wise to join them E. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the energy company defendants lessors the owners of royalty interests in the property at issue and the owners of the mineral estate in unleased part of the 9200 acres should be joined as parties if feasible

assistant: The best answer is E. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the energy company defendants lessors the owners of royalty interests in the property at issue and the owners of the mineral estate in unleased part of the 9200 acres should be joined as parties if feasible
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument. Delivery of an executed signature page of this Amendment by facsimile or other electronic transmissions shall be as effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Amendment.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties on separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered will be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together will constitute one and the same Agreement. Delivery of any executed counterpart of a signature page to this Agreement by fax, email or other electronic means will be as effective as delivery of a complete, executed original counterpart of this Agreement.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Member and the performance by each Member of his, her or its obligations hereunder in accordance with the terms hereof: (a) will not require the consent of any third party or governmental entity under any laws; (b) will not violate any laws applicable to the Member (including community property laws) and (c) will not violate or breach any contractual obligation to which the Member is a party.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement is intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement and intended to be a complete and exclusive statement of the agreement and understanding of the parties hereto in respect of the subject matter contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter. If any provision of this Agreement is found to conflict with the Purchase Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Bernal for having a defective headlight and brake light, he was traveling on Highway 287, a known drug-trafficking corridor. Bernal was also traveling from California, a state that, in the officers’ experience, had a reputation for drug trafficking. Bernal was driving a recently purchased car, and based on the officers’ experience, drug traffickers typically use a rental car or a recently purchased car when transporting narcotics. Bernal’s story about the purpose of the trip (i.e., visiting his sister) was suspicious to the officers given that he did not know her address or even the city where she lived. Bernal was driving across the country, from California to Alabama, on a suspended license, a risk that seemed inappropriate given the stated purpose of the trip (i. (5th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). Bernal also claims that his consent to search Options: A. holding that absence of an authorized driver inconsistent explanation regarding reason for trip and passengers presentation of fake id justified officers continued detention of defendants B. holding presence of a masking odor in vehicle passengers nervous behavior passengers inability to recall the name of his purport ed daughterinlaw and vast divergence between passengers and drivers statements regarding travel accommodations to california justified further detention of the vehicle for investigation of whether a crime was being committed C. holding that even a driver not listed as an authorized driver for a rental car could nevertheless have an expectation of privacy if given permission to use the car by an authorized driver D. holding officers request for passengers identification not unreasonable although unrelated to reason for stop where it did not prolong detention and passenger was under no obligation to answer E. holding that request for license destination and purpose of trip within reasonable scope of detention

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that absence of an authorized driver inconsistent explanation regarding reason for trip and passengers presentation of fake id justified officers continued detention of defendants
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of injury which would be attributed to a reasonable person under the circumstances of the case.” Kil v. Commonwealth, 12 Va.App. 802, 811, 407 S.E.2d 674, 679 (1991). “This approach ... has been characterized as ‘requiring subjective knowledge of the collision while holding the driver to a stricter reasonable man standard as to the fact or extent of the injury . . . . ” Id. at 810, 407 S.E.2d at 679 (quoting Commonwealth v. Kauffman, 323 Pa.Super. 363, 470 A.2d 634, 637 (1983)). Knowledge of injury may be imputed to a driver “where the fact of personal injury is visible or where the seriousness of the collision would lead a reasonable person to assume there must have been resulting injuries.” People v. Carter, 243 Cal.App.2d 239, 52 Cal.Rptr. 207, 208 (1966) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>); see also Marjorie A. Caner, Annotation, Options: A. holding that where the police roadblock was intended to stop brower by physical impact and did so a seizure occurred B. holding that where impact slightly dam aged bumper or fender of both cars and bumper had to be pulled away from wheel of one so it could be moved collision was not of sufficient magnitude to compel the conclusion that injuries had probably occurred C. holding that after two years of litigation the employer had waived any right it had to compel arbitration D. holding that impact in the district resulting from the defendants conduct that occurred outside the district must be deliberate not incidental E. holding that plaintiff had not stated an equal protection claim where plaintiff had not alleged that the defendant treated him differently from anyone else who both had problems with alcohol and had been arrested

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that where impact slightly dam aged bumper or fender of both cars and bumper had to be pulled away from wheel of one so it could be moved collision was not of sufficient magnitude to compel the conclusion that injuries had probably occurred
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The delivery of cash pursuant to Section 3 of this Award Agreement is conditioned on satisfaction of any applicable withholding taxes in accordance with this Section 7(a) and Section 9(d) of the Plan. No later than the date as of which an amount first becomes includible in your gross income for Federal, state, local or foreign income tax purposes with respect to any RSUs, you shall pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Company regarding the payment of, any Federal, state, local and foreign taxes that are required by applicable laws and regulations to be withheld with respect to such amount. In the event that there is withholding tax liability in connection with the settlement of the RSUs, if authorized by the Committee in its sole discretion, you may satisfy, in whole or in part, any withholding tax liability by having the Company withhold from the cash you would be entitled to receive upon settlement of the RSUs, an amount in cash equal to such withholding tax liability.

assistant: Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: § 40A-16-2 (Repl.Vol. 6, 1964) (effective July 1, 1963) (robbery defined) with NMSA 1953, § 40-42-1 (Vol. 6) (robbery while unarmed defined), and this indicates the legislature intended no distinction in the current statute. The case of Territory v. Abeita, 1 N.M. 545, 547 (Gild.) (1873), Defendant’s only citation in support of this proposition, implies that the two terms may have been used differently 100 years ago, but we are not persuaded that the legislature intended any such difference in recent years, particularly in the absence of case law to that effect. Alternatively, we note that ample authority would also support a holding that the terms are used synonymously in criminal statutes, thereby refuting Defendant’s argument. See, e.g., King v. State, 527 So.2d 641, 646 (Miss.1988) (<HOLDING>); Smith v. State, 737 P.2d 1206, 1215 Options: A. holding that violence is synonymous with force in affirming armed robbery conviction B. holding conviction for robbery under alabama statute a crime of violence both because the statute involved physical force and because robbery was one of the enumerated offenses in comment note 1 to ussg 4b12 C. holding that a conviction for florida armed robbery is a crime of violence under the armed career criminal act D. holding that a bank robbery conviction under 2113a by force and violence or by intimidation qualifies as a crime of violence under the 924c3a useofforce clause E. holding that bank robbery by force and violence or intimidation under 18 usc 2113a is a crime of violence

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that violence is synonymous with force in affirming armed robbery conviction