flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: portion of the affidavit on tape.” We are satisfied that under Criminal Rule 37(a)(l)(ii) Officer Mowry’s off-the-record statement to Magistrate Johnson may not be considered as part of the affidavit in support of the search warrant. The affidavit consists of four handwritten paragraphs followed by the words “continued on tape,” and six paragraphs transcribed from the testimony which was then recorded. Neither the written nor the taped portions of Officer Mowry’s affidavit contains any express connection between White and 21-D Kennedy Camp. The “composite affidavit” cannot be supplemented by additional material which the officer later testifies that he also told the magistrate, but which does not appear of record. See United States v. Anderson, 453 F.2d 174, 177 (9th Cir.1971) (<HOLDING>). The state’s reliance on Nelson v. State, 628 Options: A. holding that a totality of circumstances standard was proper for determining probable cause for issuance of a search warrant based on information from an informant B. holding that all data necessary to show probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant must be contained within the four corners of the affidavit C. holding that there was probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant where the officers corroboration of events that occurred during the controlled buy as set forth in the affidavit provide sufficient probable cause D. holding warrant valid where search warrant application affidavit was signed and probable cause existed for issuance of warrant E. holding that the plaintiff must show that there was a lack of probable cause for the criminal prosecution

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that all data necessary to show probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant must be contained within the four corners of the affidavit
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise provided in an employment or severance agreement between the Company and the Participant, in the event of the Participant’s Termination for any reason during the Restriction Period, all Restricted Stock still subject to restriction shall be forfeited.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of the same performance when each of them, individually, has the duty of fully performing the obligation[.]” Id. at 837. HRS § 483-1 (1993) states that “[sjeveral obligors means obligors severally bound for the same performance.” Similarly, the Introductory Note of Chapter 13 of Restatement (Second) of Contracts states that “[tjhis Chapter deals with the rights and duties created by multiple promises of the same performance^]” Restatement (Second) of Contracts, Chapter 13, introductory note. In contrast, a guarantor does not promise the “same performance” as the prin cipal debtor. While a principal debtor promises to pay a specified amount, a guarantor promises to pay that amount only if it cannot be collected from the principal debtor. See Schweitzer v. Fishel, 13 Haw. 690, 693 (1901) (<HOLDING>). A “contract of guaranty is an enforceable Options: A. holding that the court was not bound by the parties agreement that contracts were unambiguous and holding that contracts were ambiguous B. recognizing that where liability is joint and several among multiple parties complete relief may be granted with respect to any one of them C. holding that a suit against one insurance company was not compulsory as related to a suit against another insurance company because even though they were the result of the same event a hurricane strike they were two different parties with two different policies D. holding that provisions concerning joint custody and healthcare of the parties child were consistent with the signed notes E. holding a guarantor and principal debtor were not joint and several obligors they were severally parties to different contracts with the plaintiffs

assistant: The best answer is E. holding a guarantor and principal debtor were not joint and several obligors they were severally parties to different contracts with the plaintiffs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Notes and the Trustee’s certificate of authentication shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto. The Notes may have notations, legends or endorsements required by law, stock exchange rule or usage. Each Note shall be dated the date of its authentication. The Notes shall be issued in registered, global form without interest coupons and only shall be in minimum denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof (or, with respect to PIK Interest Notes, in minimum denominations of $1.00 and any integral multiple of $1.00 in excess thereof).

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Employee’s annual base salary for all services rendered shall initially be One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($175,000.00) (less applicable taxes and withholdings) payable in accordance with the Bank’s customary payroll practices as they may exist from time to time (“ Base Salary ”). The Employee’s Base Salary may be reviewed and increased by the Bank at its sole discretion, in accordance with the Bank’s policies, procedures and practices as they may exist from time to time.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All payments of Minimum Annual Rent and other monetary obligations of Tenant shall be sent to the address set forth in the Basic Lease Information, or to such other address as notified by Landlord to Tenant in writing. All notices to be given under this Lease by either party will be written and sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage pre-paid, or by express mail delivery service, addressed to the party at the address set forth in the Basic Lease Information, or to such other address as notified in writing by the parties. Notice will be deemed given as of the date of receipt or rejection or inability to deliver shown on the return receipt or other similar advice of delivery or attempted delivery. Attorneys may give notices on behalf of their respective clients.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: work commenced before the effective date of its registration; or (2) any infringement of copyright commenced after first publication of the work and before the effective date of its registration, unless the registration is made within three months after first publication of the work.” 17 U.S.C. § 412. On October 17, 2006, OxBlue first published the OxBlue Specification. The Ox-Blue Specification was not registered with the Copyright Office until March 13, 2012. OxBlue is not entitled to statutory damages and attorneys’ fees because the Ox-Blue Specification was not registered at the time the alleged infringement occurred, or within the 3-month safe harbor period between publication and registration. See M.G.B. Homes, Inc. v. Ameron Homes, Inc., 903 F.2d 1486, 1493 (11th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). OxBlue does not dispute that it is not Options: A. holding that where the plaintiffs copyright infringement claim was without a reasonable legal basis an award of attorneys fees to the defendants was a proper exercise of judicial discretion B. holding that attorneys fees and statutory damages were unavailable because the copyright was not registered at the time the alleged infringement occurred C. holding that lanham act claim was not prohibited due to fact that author had not registered copyright D. holding that a plaintiff may recover damages under both the lanham act and the copyright act provided the copyright damages serve a purpose other than compensation E. holding that conversion and unjust enrichment claims were preempted by the copyright act since they were not qualitatively different from a copyright claim because they contained no extra element beyond those necessary to show copyright infringement

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that attorneys fees and statutory damages were unavailable because the copyright was not registered at the time the alleged infringement occurred
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the majority errs in concluding Cameco has satisfied this burden by overestimating the difficulties Cameco would face were it to litigate these claims in Colorado, by underestimating the interest Colorado has to resolve this dispute, and by concluding, without support from the record, that Canada would be the most efficient venue. i The Burden on Cameco The majority’s conclusion that the exercise of personal jurisdiction in this case would be unreasonable rests primarily upon what I believe to be an exaggeration of the burden on Cameco to litigate in Colorado. In particular, the majority is concerned ■ that litigation in Colorado will require Cameco employees to “travel outside their home country” and litigate the dispute “in a forum unfami s Ltd., 138 F.3d 624, 629 (6th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). In this case, Came-co’s headquarters in Options: A. holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to require a defendant to pay all back taxes B. holding that the kentucky supreme court erroneously put the burden on the defendant to show eed when it was actually the governments obligation to prove a lack of eed C. holding that it was reasonable to require a defendant from ontario to litigate in kentucky because ontario wasonly a short plane flight away D. holding the burden of forcing a canadian defendant to litigate in florida was uncompelling E. holding that the appropriate sanction was to require the defendant to disclose the nature of the agreement with the witness

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that it was reasonable to require a defendant from ontario to litigate in kentucky because ontario wasonly a short plane flight away
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: defendant is technically in default.” The problem with plaintiffs request for default judgment is that the defendant’s answer was timely. Rule 55, Fed.R.Civ.P., governs plaintiffs motion requesting entry of a default judgment against the defendant herein. Plaintiff filed his motion for default judgment on June 25, 1997, six days after defendant filed her timely original answer. Nothing in Rule 55 authorizes a court to strike a defendant’s answer and render a default judgment simply because the plaintiff is dissatisfied with the amount of detail contained in the defendant’s answer. Thus, entry of a default judgment based upon the defendant’s failure to timely file an answer which satisfied the personal whims and caprice of the plaintiff was not authorized in this cause. Plaintiff 94), (<HOLDING>); Murray v. Mississippi Department of Options: A. holding that a states failure to follow its own procedural regulations does not constitute a violation of due process if constitutional minima are met B. holding that an employers mere failure to follow its own rules and regulations does not give rise to a protected property interest C. holding that va must follow its own regulations D. holding that a prison officials failure to follow the prisons own policies procedures and regulations does not constitute a violation of due process if constitutional minima are nevertheless met E. holding that a state agencys violations of its own internal regulations did not establish a due process violation or otherwise give rise to a constitutional claim

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a states failure to follow its own procedural regulations does not constitute a violation of due process if constitutional minima are met
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: an extension of time being granted “after the expiration of the specified period ... where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect,” Rule 9006(b)(3) renders that standard inapplicable to a motion to extend the period specified by Rule 4007(c). See Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 507 U.S. 380, 389 n. 4, 113 S.Ct. 1489, 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993) (“The time-computation and time-extension provisions of Rule 9006 ... are generally applicable to any time requirement found elsewhere in the rules unless expressly excepted. Subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) of Rule 9006 enumerate those time requirements excluded from the operation of the ‘excusable neglect’ standard.”) (emphasis added); see also In re Prego Cruz, 323 B.R. 827, 831 (B.A.P. 1st Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). The District Court did not err in holding Options: A. holding that effect of discharge of debt under bankruptcy code is the same as it was under the 1898 bankruptcy act it is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debt or B. holding that a bankruptcy court may not extend the 30day objection period C. holding that effect of bankruptcy discharge under arizona law is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debtor D. holding that rule 4007c precludes the bankruptcy court from granting latefiled motions to extend the period in which a party can object to a debtors discharge of a debt E. holding that bankruptcy discharge eliminates only a debtors personal liability and not the debt itself and that a bankruptcy trustee stands in the shoes of the debtor and can bring a legal malpractice claim as trustee

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that rule 4007c precludes the bankruptcy court from granting latefiled motions to extend the period in which a party can object to a debtors discharge of a debt
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: plans of action, and whether withholding judgment would pose a hardship to the parties. See NE Hub Partners, 239 F.3d at 344. Should this Court enjoin the PUC from continuing its proceedings, that resolution would certainly be useful to Amtrak. Such a resolution would relieve Amtrak the burden of participating in a time consuming state process, and withholding judgment would subject Amtrak to the hardship of that process. See NE Hub Partners, 239 F.3d at 343, 345. Consequently, the Court concludes that Amtrak’s Complaint against the PUC is ripe. Finally, the PUC claims that it is immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. Amtrak contends that collateral es-toppel bars nnsylvania Public Utility Com’n, 1998 WL 103377, at *2-3 (E.D.Pa. Feb.23, 1998) (<HOLDING>), appeal dismissed, 178 F.3d 1280 (3rd Cir. Options: A. holding that res judicata did not apply where a trial courts order was not a final judgment B. holding that rule 60b cannot provide any relief from the district courts judgment on an 18 usc 3582 motion because 3582 actions are criminal in nature and rule 60b is applicable only to civil proceedings C. holding that decision that puc was not arm of the state was res judicata and denying pucs rule 60b motion for relief from judgment D. holding that the standard of review is abuse of discretion and an appeal from denial of rule 60b relief does not bring up the underlying judgment for review E. holding that res judicata is not applicable to a claim for relief that was unavailable in the earlier action

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that decision that puc was not arm of the state was res judicata and denying pucs rule 60b motion for relief from judgment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: based on a statutory interpretation that was inconsistent with an intervening decision of the Supreme Court). As the Second Circuit’s traditional understanding of Wilko and § 10 — that Wilko endorsed manifest disregard and that § 10’s grounds are not exclusive — is inconsistent with the basis for the holding in Hall Street, the Court finds that the manifest disregard of the law standard is no longer good law. Even assuming arguendo that “manifest disregard” remains a viable doctrine, “the reach of [this] doctrine is ‘severely limited.’ ” Halligan v. Piper Jaffray, Inc., 148 F.3d 197, 202 (2d Cir.1998) (citations omitted). In fact, even a court convinced that an arbitrator incorrectly applied the law is not free to vacate the award. See Wallace v. Buttar, 378 F.3d 182, 190 (2d Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). Rather, vacatur for manifest disregard of the Options: A. holding that an order remanding an arbitration award is not a final appealable order when the order does not also vacate the arbitration award B. holding that arbitration award is binding on the parties C. holding the appellate court must presume adequate evidence to support the award when appellant sought to vacate the award based on gross mistake with no transcript of the arbitration proceedings D. holding that because the federal arbitration act provides that requests for relief should be made by motion rather than by filing a complaint the rules of notice pleading provided for in fedrcivp 8 do not apply to a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award E. holding that a federal court cannot vacate an arbitral award merely because it is convinced that the arbitration panel made the wrong call on the law

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a federal court cannot vacate an arbitral award merely because it is convinced that the arbitration panel made the wrong call on the law
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as specified in Section 3(e) hereof, this Agreement (together with any agreements entered into in connection with the Prior Grants) contains the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the matters covered herein, and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, commitments, agreements and writings with respect to the subject matter hereof (including, without limitation, the Prior Agreement), all such other negotiations, commitments, agreements and writings shall have no further force or effect, and the parties to any such other negotiation, commitment, agreement or writing shall have no further rights or obligations thereunder.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: S. Kreindler et al., 15 N.Y. Practice Series, N.Y. Law of Torts § 12:38 (2013) (“A restaurant owner, as a landowner, has a duty to make the premises reasonably safe for persons on the property. Accordingly, a restaurant owner must take appropriate measures to protect persons on the premises from foreseeable criminal acts of third persons.”). Evidence of prior criminal acts sufficiently similar to the instant act can demonstrate foreseeability. See, e.g., Maysonet v. KFC, Nat’l Mgmt. Co., 906 F.2d 929, 931 (2d Cir.1990); Jacqueline S. v. City of New York, 81 N.Y.2d 288, 295, 598 N.Y.S.2d 160, 163, 614 N.E.2d 723 (1993). Here, Gray adduced evidence that she was physically assaulted by a group of loud and profane customers whom she asked to be quiet 584 N.Y.S.2d 64, 64 (1st Dep’t 1992) (<HOLDING>). Nor is it a case in which the prior assaults Options: A. holding that no seizure occurred where officers boarded bus and began questioning passengers gave passengers no reason to believe that they required an answer and tjhere was no application of force no intimidating movement no overwhelming show of force no brandishing of weapons no blocking of exits no threat no command not even an authoritative tone of voice B. holding where there is no duty to defend there is no duty to indemnify C. holding that a plaintiff had no injury in fact and consequently no standing when it had no enforceable contract right against the defendant D. holding in a similar factual situation that the bankruptcy court had no jurisdiction because it had no actual or constructive possession of the letters of credit involved E. holding that defendant had no duty where tjhere was no evidence of a pattern of criminal activity or of even one similar incident involving different patrons

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that defendant had no duty where tjhere was no evidence of a pattern of criminal activity or of even one similar incident involving different patrons
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. An executed signature page of this Agreement delivered by facsimile or electronic transmission shall be as effective as an original executed signature page.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) The Borrower agrees to pay to each Lender (other than any Defaulting Lender), through the Administrative Agent, on the date that is the last Business Day of March, June, September and December in each year and on the date on which the Revolving Facility Commitments of all the Lenders shall be terminated as provided herein, a commitment fee (a “ Commitment Fee ”) on the daily amount of the applicable Available Unused Commitment of such Lender during the preceding quarter (or other period commencing with the Closing Date or ending with the date on which the last of the Commitments of such Lender shall be terminated) at a rate equal to the Applicable Commitment Fee. All Commitment Fees shall be computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed in a year of 360 days. The Commitment Fee due to each Lender shall commence to accrue on the Closing Date and shall cease to accrue on the date on which the last of the Commitments of such Lender shall be terminated as provided herein.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All fees and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such fees or expenses, whether or not the transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement are consummated.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Executive shall pay the initial arbitration filing (but only so much of the filing fees as the Executive would have instead paid had he filed a complaint in a court of law), and the Company shall pay the remaining costs and expenses of such arbitration (unless the Executive requests that each party pay one-half of the costs and expenses of such arbitration or unless otherwise required by law). The Company and the Executive shall each pay separately its counsel fees and expenses unless otherwise required by law.

assistant: Costs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: linden lab owns the bits and bytes of electronic data stored on its servers , and accordingly will not be liable for any deletion , corruption or data loss that occurs in connection with the service .

assistant: Limitation of liability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: firms or corporations liable” is unambiguous and discharges all potential tortfeasors from liability. See, e.g., Battle v. Clanton, 27 N.C.App. 616, 220 S.E.2d 97, 99 (1975), cert. denied, 289 N.C. 613, 223 S.E.2d 391 (1976); Hasselrode v. Gnagey, 404 Pa. 549, 172 A.2d 764, 765 (1961). The parties t ic evidence of intent must be considered); Hurt v. Leatherby Ins. Co., 380 So.2d 432, 433-34 (Fla.1980) (adopting intent rule and holding that release containing handwritten and preprinted terms was inherently ambiguous); Cram v. Toum of Northbridge, 410 Mass. 800, 575 N.E.2d 747, 749 (1991) (reversing summary judgment because accident victim filed an affidavit in which she stated she intended to discharge only the driver who injured her); Wells, 530 N.Y.S.2d at 521, 526 N.E.2d at 12 (<HOLDING>); Krauss, 852 P.2d at 1019-20 (same). A Options: A. holding that extrinsic evidence of the parties course of conduct may be considered where the contract language is ambiguous B. holding that a court may consider extrinsic evidence to determine whether a contract is ambiguous C. holding that court must determine intent of parties by reference to language of release turning to extrinsic evidence only when it determines as a matter of law that terms are ambiguous D. holding that court may not use extrinsic evidence unless contract language is ambiguous E. holding that extrinsic evidence admissible to determine intent of parties

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that court must determine intent of parties by reference to language of release turning to extrinsic evidence only when it determines as a matter of law that terms are ambiguous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Cinergy's appeal, the trial court re-set the hearing on Safety and Cinergy's motions. About one week prior to the hearing, Safety filed a motion to stay the proceedings and to compel arbitration. A review of all of Safety's actions after the commencement of litigation reveals that it did not participate ted Home Life Ins., Co., 549 N.E.2d 67, 71 (Ind.Ct.App.1990) (finding no waiver because defendant "asserted its right to arbitrate throughout the proceedings"), adopted by 563 N.E.2d 609 (Ind.1990). Cf. JKL Components Corp. v. Insul-Reps, Inc., 596 N.E.2d 945 (Ind.Ct.App.1992) (refusing to compel arbitration as appellant made no effort to specifically request arbitration at any time before appeal), trans. denied; Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Dalson, 421 N.E.2d 691, 692-693 (Ind.Ct.App.1981) (<HOLDING>); Shahan, 181 Ind.App. at 45, 390 N.E.2d at Options: A. holding that the party demanding arbitration had waived its right to arbitrate by filing eight months earlier a complaint against the other party to the arbitration agreement B. holding that after two years of litigation the employer had waived any right it had to compel arbitration C. holding that a defendant that answered complaint filed a counterclaim participated in discovery and did not move to compel arbitration waived the right to arbitrate D. holding that in ruling on a motion to compel arbitration a court must consider 1 whether the parties have entered into a valid arbitration agreement 2 whether an arbitrable issue exists and 3 whether the right to arbitration has been waived E. holding plaintiffs had waived their right to arbitrate where they had consistently resisted arbitration and only when an unfavorable judgment was entered against them at trial did they seek to compel arbitration

assistant: The best answer is E. holding plaintiffs had waived their right to arbitrate where they had consistently resisted arbitration and only when an unfavorable judgment was entered against them at trial did they seek to compel arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the attached exhibits constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties as to the subject matter of this Agreement and, as of the Effective Date, supersedes and merges all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, representations, agreements, and understandings regarding the same.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be either personally delivered, or mailed certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested) and by first class U.S. mail (postage prepaid) or sent by reputable overnight courier service (charges prepaid) to the Company or the Investor, as applicable at the addresses set forth below. Notices complying with the requirements of this Section 8 shall be deemed given when delivered personally, three days after deposit in the U.S. mail or one day after deposit with a reputable overnight courier service.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Ass’n of Pa. v. DPW, 585 Pa. 106, 116 n. 12, 888 A.2d 601, 607 n. 12 (2005) (“In ruling on whether preliminary objections were properly sustained, an appellate court must determine whether it is clear and free from doubt from all the facts pleaded that the pleader will be unable to prove facts legally sufficient to establish a right to relief.” (citation omitted)). On the merits, I note that this Court has previously interpreted statutory provisions governing the training of police officers that are analogous to those in issue here as extending to officials who were not technically subject to their terms but nevertheless were cloaked with authority on a par with the police officers that the statute directly covered. See Commonwealth v. Leet, 537 Pa. 89, 96-97, 641 A.2d 299, 303 (1994) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, I also believe that a demurrer Options: A. holding that the sensible and popular understanding of what a motor vehicle accident entails necessarily involves the motor vehicle being operated as a motor vehicle B. holding that ems training lieutenants position met criteria because the lieutenants developed coordinated implemented and conducted ems training programs prepared lesson plans and training aids supervised delivery of training and tests and evaluated new equipment C. holding that the plaintiff had offered insufficient evidence to establish deliberate indifference in a failuretotrain claim in part because the plaintiff did not present evidence that the training received was inadequate or evidence of any specific additional training that the employees should have received D. holding that an expert established a national standard of care for police officer training by testifying that police departments throughout the country commonly trained officers to deal with mentally distuibed persons and by naming several departments that offered such training E. holding that sheriffs and deputy sheriffs enforcing motor vehicle laws were required to meet the training requirements of the former municipal police officers education and training act 53 ps 7417491 repealed

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that sheriffs and deputy sheriffs enforcing motor vehicle laws were required to meet the training requirements of the former municipal police officers education and training act 53 ps 7417491 repealed
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that he still bore scars from these wounds and submitted doctors’ reports confirming the injuries to his wrist and back. When Plesea attempted to report the episode to the police, he was mockingly-told to seek relief in Strasbourg, which is the seat of the European Court of Human Rights. Plesea further testified that later that year, in August, the police detained him for his religious activities in his home city of Ploiesti. The police physically abused him and threatened him with arrest if he did not cease proselytizing. The Pleseas subsequently left Romania. The cumulative evidence in the record, if we assume it is credible, compels the conclusion that Plesea suffered past persecution on account of his religious beliefs. See Korablina v. INS, 158 F.3d 1038, 1045 (9th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). The police officers’ mockery and their Options: A. holding that to constitute persecution harm must be more than harassment B. holding that harassment threats and one beating did not constitute persecution C. holding that material alterations in the applicants account of persecution are sufficient to support an adverse credibility finding D. holding that a petitioners unwillingness to return must be based upon persecution or a wellfounded fear of persecution on account of race religion nationality membership in a particular social group or political opinion E. holding that facts compelled finding of persecution where record showed cumulative specific instances of violence and harassment on account of religion

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that facts compelled finding of persecution where record showed cumulative specific instances of violence and harassment on account of religion
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Conversely, if the lender increases the interest rate in a manner not previously disclosed, the rate increase would constitute a new transaction subjecting it to new disclosure requirements. In Key Sav. Bank, F.S.B. v. Dean, 695 So.2d 808, 810 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), we held that “increases in interest rates are not considered ‘new transactions’ when a creditor gives prior disclosure that rates are subject to change, the conditions of the changes, and the limits of any possible change.” We further stated that “If [the lender] properly disclosed the variable-rate information, then each rate change would be just a subsequent occurrence.” Id. at 810; accord Hubbard v. Fidelity Federal Bank, 824 F.Supp. 909, 918 (C.D.Cal.1993), ajfd in part and rev’d in part, 91 F.3d 75 (9th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). It is not merely the initial “mis-disclosure” Options: A. holding that once a rate is filed with the appropriate agency except for review of the agencys orders the courts can assume no right to a different rate on that ground that in its opinion it is the only or the more reasonable rate B. holding that under the filed rate doctrine a question regarding reasonable rates should be addressed to the department of insurance and that the rate plaintiff was charged is conclusively presumed reasonable under the filed rate doctrine C. holding that with respect to the eaja the local or national market rate for legal services cannot be a special factor used to increase the rate beyond the statutory rate D. holding that the proper rate for prejudgment interest is the rate fixed by the parties in a contract E. holding under 12 cfr part 226 supp i 20a1984 a lender is obligated to provide new disclosures if the variable rate feature was not properly disclosed in accordance with regulation z and the lender 1 increases the rate based on a variable rate feature that was not previously disclosed or 2 adds a variablerate feature to the obligationemphasis added

assistant: The best answer is E. holding under 12 cfr part 226 supp i 20a1984 a lender is obligated to provide new disclosures if the variable rate feature was not properly disclosed in accordance with regulation z and the lender 1 increases the rate based on a variable rate feature that was not previously disclosed or 2 adds a variablerate feature to the obligationemphasis added
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 429 U.S. 399 97 S.Ct. 657 50 L.Ed.2d 638 William J. GUSTE, Jr., Attorney General of Louisiana, et al.v.Calvin JACKSON and Delta Woman's Clinic, Inc. No. 76-61. Decided Jan. 17, 1977. PER CURIAM. 1 A Louisiana statute1 forbids performance of an abortion on a minor without her parents' consent, or her husband's consent if she is married. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana enjoined enforcement of the statute. Its decision discusses only these special requirements for abortions on minors, but the injunction appears to extend to the entire statute, and thus includes "informed consent" requirements applicable to all women. We vacate the injunction insofar as it bars enforcement of the "informed consent" requirements, and remand to the District Court so that it may consider the construction of those requirements, their validity in light of this Court's intervening decision in Planned Parenthood of Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52, 65-67, 96 S.Ct. 2831, at 2839-2840, 49 L.Ed.2d 788 (1976), and their severability from the remainder of the statute. 2 So ordered. 1 Louisiana Rev.Stat.Ann. § 40:1299.33(D) (Supp.1976) reads as follows: "No abortion shall be performed on any woman unless prior to the abortion she shall have been advised, orally and in writing, that she is not required to submit to the abortion and that she may refuse any abortion for any reason and without explanation and that she shall not be deprived of any governmental assistance or any other kind of benefits for refusing to submit to an abortion. This provision shall be of full force and effect notwithstanding the fact that the woman in question is a minor, in which event said minor's parents or if a minor emancipated by marriage, the minor's husband, shall also be fully advised of their right to refuse an abortion for the minor in the same manner as the minor is advised. Compliance with this provision shall be evidenced by the written consent of the woman that she submits to the abortion voluntarily and of her own free will, and by written consent of her parents, if she is an unmarried minor, and by consent of her husband if she is a minor emancipated by marriage, such written consent to set forth the written advice given and the written consent and acknowledgment that a full explanation of the abortion procedure to be performed has been given and is understood."

assistant: 5
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: for such examinations exists. The Court agrees, in light of the nature of injuries and the extent of damages sought which remain at issue in this case. Thus, only issues for the Court to determine are whether x-rays, MRI’s, and a medical history fall within the permissible scope of such examinations. During Rule 35, Fed.R.Civ.P., examinations, courts often allow “routine procedures.” Trenary v. Busch Entertainment Corp., 2006 WL 3333621, *4 (M.D.Fla.2006) (ordering examinations to proceed according to “routine procedures”); Morton v. Haskell Company, 1995 WL 819182, *4 (MD.Fla., Sept.12, 1995) (same). Many courts have found, for example, that a review of medical history assists the doctor in his or her evaluation. See, e.g., Romano v. II Morrow, Inc., 173 F.R.D. 271, 273 (D.Or.1997) (<HOLDING>); Hertenstein v. Kimberly Home Health Care, Options: A. holding that the mother can be deemed to have waived the physicianpatient privilege only with respect to the medical history and records pertaining to the period when the plaintiff was in utero during which time there could be no severance of the infants prenatal history from his mothers medical history B. holding that review of medical history during an examination assisted doctors medical conclusions C. holding that an aljs own medical analysis which is contrary to medical evidence is invalid D. holding restriction of questions during examination unduly restricts physicians ability to reach medical conclusions E. holding that a patients settlement of a prior action brought against him by doctors for payment of a bill did not bar medical malpractice action against doctors

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that review of medical history during an examination assisted doctors medical conclusions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: resulted in a different recovery. 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(b)(3)(D); Black, 646 F.3d at 264. Hylind also raises several challenges to the damages determinations made by the district court. “A court’s calculation of damages is a finding of fact and therefore is reviewable only for clear error, but to the extent those calculations were influenced by legal error, review is de novo.” Universal Furniture Intern., Inc. v. Collezione Europa USA, Inc., 618 F.3d 417, 427 (4th Cir.2010). Hylind first complains that the district court’s determinations as to the duration and rate of back pay improperly intruded on the fact-finding duties of the jury. However, the determination of back pay is an equitable matter for the judge, not the jury. See Duke v. Uniroyal Inc., 928 F.2d 1413, 1424 (4th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>); Lutz v. Glendale Union High Sch., 403 F.3d Options: A. holding that an award of compensation for future lost earnings or front pay is an equitable matter for the court not the jury B. holding that failure to award front pay because the district court impliedly found that other relief was sufficient did not constitute an abuse of discretion C. holding plaintiffs could not obtain compensation for both lost value and lost profit D. holding that an award of back pay is an issue for the court E. holding lost pension benefits recoverable as front pay

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that an award of compensation for future lost earnings or front pay is an equitable matter for the court not the jury
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of Appeals stated in Bluebonnet Savings, “The contract itself is notice of binding duties, and when it requires that amendments be in writing, that is additional notice not to rely on oral representations.” 907 S.W.2d at 908. In Bluebonnet, the court of appeals concluded, as a matter of law, that the borrowers failed to prove they justifiably relied to their detriment on statements by the lender’s agents that “everything looked fine” regarding a loan restructuring proposal and “everything would be okay.” Id. at 909. In Bluebonnet, the borrower, w jury’s verdict on Schleider’s alternative theory of negligent misrepresentation. Accordingly, we render judgment Schleider take nothing under his alternative theory of recovery. III. I d 366, 369 (Tex.Civ.App.-Austin 1974, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (<HOLDING>). Because there is no evidence of a binding Options: A. holding promise lacked definiteness of essential element ie the total sum to be underwritten during a period of six years B. holding that failure to instruct on an essential element was harmless error because the element was so clearly established C. holding that causation is an essential element in failure to warn claim D. holding that damage to the property of another is an essential element of the offense of criminal mischief E. holding dollar amount is not an essential element

assistant: The best answer is A. holding promise lacked definiteness of essential element ie the total sum to be underwritten during a period of six years