flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company hereby represents and warrants to each Shareholder that the Company has the requisite capacity and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Company, constitutes a legal, valid and binding agreement of the Company, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, moratorium, reorganization or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and the availability of equitable remedies (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law).

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: noncore matters). Accordingly, the validity of the district court’s decision, refusing to permit withdrawal, is inextricably tied to the bankruptcy judge’s earlier ruling that ESR’s claims constitute core bankruptcy proceedings. In such a situation, where reconsideration of a ruling material to an order provides grounds for reversal of the entire order, review of issues other than those certified by the district court as “controlling” is appropriate. See Ducre, 752 F.2d at 983 n. 16. Therefore, we review the bankruptcy court’s determination that the claims are core. IV. Core Determination In 1984, Congress amended the bankruptcy code in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982) (<HOLDING>). The new structure is based upon the Options: A. holding that the bankruptcy courts as compared to state courts have exclusive jurisdiction to determine issues of dischargeability under the bankruptcy code B. holding that the eleventh amendment does not bar a bankruptcy court from issuing a money judgment against a state under the bankruptcy code C. holding that congress jurisdictional grant to bankruptcy courts to hear proceedings related to a bankruptcy case suggests a grant of some breadth and includes inter alia suits between third parties which have an effect on the bankruptcy estate D. holding the broad jurisdictional grant given the bankruptcy courts under the 1978 bankruptcy act unconstitutional E. holding that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over counterclaims asserted by the bankruptcy estate against a creditor where the claim is a state law action independent of the federal bankruptcy law and not necessarily resolvable by a ruling on the creditors proof of claim in the bankruptcy emphasis added

assistant: The best answer is D. holding the broad jurisdictional grant given the bankruptcy courts under the 1978 bankruptcy act unconstitutional
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: expressly exempt from that procedure and 3) the CBA provides no express alternative means for resolving a contractual dispute under Article 10. Farley disagrees and contends that it is exactly in cases such as this where the agreement lacks a provision for arbitration or some other method for final resolution that relief in federal court is statutorily permitted. The Court agrees. The United States Supreme Court has long recognized that district courts have subject matter jurisdiction in a dispute over an employee’s rights under a collective bargaining agreement in the absence of an agreement for arbitration or some other form of final resolution. 29 U.S.C. § 185(a); see also Local 369, Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO v. Boston Edison Co., 588 F.Supp. 800, 804 (D.Mass.1984)(<HOLDING>), aff'd, 752 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1984). Generally, Options: A. holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a bill stuffer where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution B. holding that a party attempting to compel arbitration must first establish that the dispute in question falls within the scope of a valid arbitration agreement C. holding that judicial is review available in the absence of an agreement for arbitration or some other form of final resolution of a dispute D. holding that judicial review of arbitration awards is narrow in scope E. holding that the federal arbitration act requires piecemeal resolution when necessary to give effect to an arbitration agreement and mandates enforcement of an arbitration agreement notwithstanding the presence of other persons who are parties to the underlying dispute but not to the arbitration agreement emphasis added

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that judicial is review available in the absence of an agreement for arbitration or some other form of final resolution of a dispute
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: whether Lamb unreasonably failed to avail herself of her employer’s remedies against sexual harassment. The City argues that Lamb was unreasonable in tailing to report what she perceived to be Peterson’s harassing remarks until months after they were actually made. The City also contends that Lamb failed to cooperate fully during the City’s investigation following her July 11 grievance. However, Lamb indicated that she did not report Peterson’s behavior immediately because she did not wish to cause trouble when she was relatively new to her job. Lamb Aff., ¶ 6. The Fifth Circuit has clarified that delay in reporting alone is not per se an "unreasonable failure” to take care. Watts, 170 F.3d at 510-11. But see Scrivner v. Socorro Independent School District, 169 F.3d 969 (5th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). In addition, while Lamb was perhaps not as Options: A. holding that plaintiffs legal malpractice claim was not ripe until the appeal had been exhausted because plaintiffs harm remained speculative until then B. holding unreasonable plaintiffs failure to complain from the summer of 1995 until march 1996 C. holding that definition in iowa code chapter 321 1995 was expressly confined to that chapter and did not apply to iowa code section 36412 1995 D. holding similar allegations supported that the plaintiffs negligence claim did not accrue until plaintiffs loan payments exceeded his ability to pay E. holding the 1995 amendment to section 5601c removed all rights to appeal from a section 5402 ruling

assistant: The best answer is B. holding unreasonable plaintiffs failure to complain from the summer of 1995 until march 1996
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: denying 'the motion. This he may do, for such order of denial, after entry of judgment, amounts to a decision to let the judgment stand ... and since nothing further remains to be determined in the cause, the order of denial is a “final decision.... ” Id. at 291; James Wm. Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 59.62[2](3d ed.1997) (same; citing Peterman). Similarly, in Abbs, Judge Posner observed: If the judgment was correct when rendered but afterward something happens that requires that the judgment be changed, the denial of a Rule 59(e) motion would be separately appealable from the judgment — the appellant’s only quarrel with the district court being over its failure to take account of the post-judgment event. 963 F.2d at 925 (dictum). See also Mazzo-la, 795 F.2d at 223-24 (<HOLDING>). Here, GenCorp filed a notice of appeal from Options: A. holding that the filing of a motion for reconsideration does not toll the period for seeking judicial review of the underlying order B. holding that the appellate court should have construed the notice of appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate the judgment as an attempt to appeal from the underlying judgment C. holding that appellate court had jurisdiction over claimants appeal from the denial of his motion for reconsideration separable from underlying judgment despite claimants failure to appeal from the underlying judgment because the reconsideration motion raised changes in the relevant medical criteria D. holding that appeal from denial of rule 60b motion raised for review only the district courts order of denial and not the underlying judgment itself E. holding that an appeal from a denial of a rule 59e motion should have been construed as seeking review of the underlying judgment

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that appellate court had jurisdiction over claimants appeal from the denial of his motion for reconsideration separable from underlying judgment despite claimants failure to appeal from the underlying judgment because the reconsideration motion raised changes in the relevant medical criteria
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Loan Parties have disclosed to the Lender all agreements, instruments and corporate or other restrictions to which any Loan Party or any Subsidiary is subject, and all other matters known to it, that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. None of the reports, financial statements, certificates or other information furnished by or on behalf of any Loan Party or any Subsidiary to the Lender in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or any other Loan Document (as modified or supplemented by other information so furnished) contains any material misstatement of fact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided that, with respect to projected financial information, the Loan Parties represent only that such information was prepared in good faith based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time delivered and, if such projected financial information was delivered prior to the Effective Date, as of the Effective Date.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: not attempted murder. I didn’t try to kill no one. I was defending a woman that was in distress.” Id. at 126. Dr. Calla-way’s March 9, 2014 report stated that Zamani “provided a coherent and plausible account of the alleged offense,” that he “identified potential witnesses and evidence in his case,” that he “indicated he had been offered a plea deal but he did not want to accept the terms,” that, “According to [Zamani], he had read the depositions and he had written out his defense strategies including questions for witnesses,” and that he ial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s belated motion to assert an insanity defense where the defendant did not make showing of good cause as required by statute)); see also Dudley v. State, 480 N.E.2d 881, 895 (Ind.1985) (<HOLDING>). Za-mani has not demonstrated he is entitled Options: A. holding that the defendants motion for discharge was premature and thus properly denied by the trial court B. holding that since trial had begun and the defendant failed to offer evidence rising to the level of good cause showing why the defense was not previously raised the trial court properly denied the appellants motion for psychiatric examination and noting the trial court had observed that the information learned by the defendants counsel was previously available and could not be considered newly discovered C. holding that upon remand if the trial court determined that the testimony in a newly discovered evidence claim was reliable the trial court must review that new evidence as well as brady claims that were previously rejected in a prior postconviction motion because the evidence was equally accessible to the defense and there was no reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different had the evidence been disclosed D. holding that the defendant did not demonstrate and our review of the record did not reveal that the defendant made a showing of good cause as to why his late notice should be accepted and as such the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the defendants belated oral motion to assert an insanity defense E. holding that affidavit from a new witness was not newly discovered evidence because trial counsel knew of the existence of the witness before trial trial counsel with due diligence could have discovered the evidence

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that since trial had begun and the defendant failed to offer evidence rising to the level of good cause showing why the defense was not previously raised the trial court properly denied the appellants motion for psychiatric examination and noting the trial court had observed that the information learned by the defendants counsel was previously available and could not be considered newly discovered
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you understand and agree that spotify does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for the behavior , features , or content of any third party application or for any transaction you may enter into with the provider of any such third party applications .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The validity, interpretation and enforcement of this Amendment No. 6 and any dispute arising out of the relationship between the parties hereto whether in contract, tort, equity or otherwise, shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of New York but excluding any principles of conflicts of law or other rule of law that would cause the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the laws of the State of New York.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as set forth on Schedule 5.5 , there is no Proceeding (filed by any Person other than Buyer or any of its Affiliates) pending or, to Seller’s Knowledge, threatened against Seller by or before any Governmental Authority that would reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on Seller’s ability to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any of the Transactions or which seeks an Order restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting or making illegal any of the Transactions or the transactions contemplated hereby.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of North America, 508 So.2d 395, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (noting, although court's decision was not predicated on Legislative Staff Summary and Analysis, this particular type of extrinsic aid to statutory interpretation is accorded significant respect by Florida courts). 6 . We would note that strong arguments may be made that the individual members' notes are also an integral part of the deliberation process and that required disclosure would only force members to rely on their memories. It is , v. Gosser, 20 Ohio St.3d 30, 485 N.E.2d 706, 710 (1985) (finding judge's personal notes regarding trial and sentencing hearing were not public records); American Fedn. of Govt. Emp., Local 2782 v. United States Dept. of Commerce, 632 F.Supp. 1272 (D.D.C.1986), aff'd 907 F.2d 203 (D.C.Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). But cf. Tingling v. Lang, 39 Misc.2d 338, 240 Options: A. holding employees personal notes not intended for distribution through usual agency channels are beyond the scope of the federal foia B. holding that foia exemptions are not mandatory bars to disclosure because the purpose of foia is to provide broad disclosure of government documents C. holding that the scope of the trade secrets act is at least coextensive with that of exemption 4 of foia D. holding that when a plaintiff has no pending foia request with an agency and has not averred that he intends to make foia requests to the agency in the future any claim of future injury is simply too speculative and remote to give him standing E. holding that a response to a foia request falls within the scope of 3730e4as administrative report provision

assistant: The best answer is A. holding employees personal notes not intended for distribution through usual agency channels are beyond the scope of the federal foia
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All covenants, agreements, representations and warranties made by Borrower herein and in the certificates or other instruments delivered in connection with or pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered to have been relied upon by the other parties hereto and shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the making of any Loans and issuance of any Letters of Credit, regardless of any investigation made by any such other party or on its behalf and notwithstanding that the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or any Lender may have had notice or knowledge of any Default or incorrect representation or warranty at the time any credit is extended hereunder, and shall continue in full force and effect as long as the principal of or any accrued interest on any Loan or any fee or any other amount payable under this Agreement is outstanding and unpaid or any Letter of Credit is outstanding and so long as the Commitments and Letter of Credit Commitments have not expired or terminated. The provisions of Sections 2.4, 2.14 , 2.15 , 2.16 , 2.17 and 10.3 and Article IX shall survive and remain in full force and effect regardless of the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, the repayment of the Loans, the expiration or termination of the Letters of Credit, the Letter of Credit Commitments and the Commitments or the termination of this Agreement or any provision hereof.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties named herein and their respective successors and permitted assigns. No Party may assign either this Agreement or any of its rights, interests or obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other Parties; provided that the Buyer may assign his rights, interests and obligations hereunder to an entity wholly-owned by Buyer.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 2. It is understood that the Receiving Party may disclose any of the Confidential Information to the Receiving Party's (and its subsidiaries' and affiliates') directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives (including attorneys and financial advisors), and prospective bank or institutional lenders, (collectively, "Representatives") who require such material in connection with a possible or actual Transaction (provided that such Representatives shall be informed by the Receiving Party of the confidential nature of the Confidential Information and shall agree to act in accordance with the terms hereof).

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and unnecessary technical statutory and common law distinctions,” Driver v. United States, 521 A.2d 254, 258 (D.C.1987) (citation and quotation omitted), the District created a single statute consolidating the various forms of larceny, false pretenses and embezzlement into a single offense called “theft.” D.C. Code § 22-3811. The new crime punishes one who “wrongfully obtains or uses the property of another” with the requisite intent, D.C. Code § 22-3811(b), and defines the just-quoted phrase as “(1) [tjaking or exercising control over property; (2) making an unauthorized use, disposition ... or possession of property; or (3) obtaining property by trick, false pretense ... or deception.” D.C. Code § 22-3811(a); see also Galberth v. United States, 590 A.2d 990, 991 n. 1 (D.C.1991) (<HOLDING>). Although the District’s 1982 categorization Options: A. holding that defendants auto theft conviction could serve to support his conviction for auto theft as a class c felony and as a prior unrelated felony conviction under the habitual offender statute B. holding automobile exeeption did not apply to warrantless search of vehicle where vehicle was not readily mobile because the vehicle was legally parked in parking lot occupants of vehicle were seated on a bench in the playground near the parking lot police officers surrounded the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle was handcuffed for safety purposes C. holding that dui conviction merges with aggravat ed assault by vehicle while dui conviction D. holding that conviction for unauthorized use of vehicle merges with conviction for theft of same vehicle E. holding proof of possession of stolen goods is sufficient evidence to sustain conviction for theft

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that conviction for unauthorized use of vehicle merges with conviction for theft of same vehicle
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Lenders shall have received (i) audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and its Subsidiaries for the 2014 and 2015 fiscal years, (ii) unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company and its Subsidiaries for each fiscal quarter ended after the date of the latest applicable financial statements delivered pursuant to clause (i) of this paragraph as to which such financial statements are available, and such financial statements shall not, in the reasonable judgment of the Administrative Agent, reflect any material adverse change in the consolidated financial condition of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as reflected in the audited, consolidated financial statements described in clause (i) of this paragraph and (iii) satisfactory quarterly projections through 2016 and annual projections through 2020 (including the key assumptions and drivers for such projections).

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any term or provision of this Agreement is held or deemed by Lender to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remainder of this Agreement and the same shall remain in full force and effect.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Woodruff, 735 F.3d at 449 (emphasis add ed, quotation marks omitted). There is no meaningful distinction between possessing narcotics with intent to “manufacture, deliver or sell,” and possessing them with intent to “manufacture, import, export, distribute, or dispense.” Section 39-17-417 is a categorical controlled substance offense. With the predicate questions resolved, we can finally turn to the actions of the district court. At sentencing, the district court had before it a PSR stating that Defendant had violated one of two crimes — one a categorical controlled substance offense and one not. If Defendant had objected, the district court could not have decided which statute Defendant had violated based on the PSR’s vague description of the offense. Cf. Wynn, 579 F.3d at 576-77 (<HOLDING>). Defendant, however, did not object. In fact, Options: A. holding that the categorical approach applies to 924c B. holding that application of the modified categorical approach did not establish a covered conviction where the judgment of conviction did not contain the factual basis for the crime C. holding that courts may consider a plea agreement and other documents contained in the record of conviction when applying the modified categorical approach D. holding that a district court cannot use the psrs factual statements when applying the modified categorical approach E. holding modified categorical approach unavailable where the statute of conviction was missing an element of the generic definition

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a district court cannot use the psrs factual statements when applying the modified categorical approach
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: To the fullest extent permitted by law, this Agreement shall not be assigned by either Party without the prior written consent of the other Party; provided that FCCG shall be entitled to assign all or any part of this Agreement to any transferee of all of its Shares, and such transferee shall, as a condition to such transfer, agree to perform FCCG’s obligations hereunder with respect to such Shares. The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the Company and FCCG and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: within the meaning of the definition of “mobile equipment” and was therefore excluded from coverage under the auto exclusion. The court differentiated “use” from “purpose” and concluded that omission of the word “use” from the definition clearly indicated that personal use of the truck was not relevant in determining whether the truck was mobile equipment, that is, designed (structurally suited) or maintained (functionally suited) for the sole purpose (not use) of affording mobility to the welding equipment. See 400 So.2d at 723 (concluding the insured’s sole purpose (goal or aim) for maintaining the truck was to provide mobility to the welding equipment even though the truck was also used for personal transportation); see also Williams v. Galliano, 601 So.2d 769, 774 (La.Ct.App.1992) (<HOLDING>). In any event, the evidence showed that Options: A. holding consent to search truck for guns and drugs permitted twohour and fortyfive minute search during which the officers removed and inspected pieces of the truck used a fiber optic scope to search the gas tank air conditioning vents fenders and other hidden areas of the truck climbed under the truck with a flashlight pulled apart the door and interi or fabric panels and used a stethoscope B. holding truck lessors liability to truck lessee existed without parties express indemnity clause in lease thus exclusion was inapplicable where carolina casualty alleged its insured truck lessor was precluded from coverage because lessors liability was assumed under contract with truck lessee C. holding that an insurance company did not have a duty to defend the plaintiff because providing directions to a concrete mixing truck does not constitute use of the truck D. holding garbage truck was not mobile equipment under similar definition because it was designed or maintained for sole purpose of providing mobility to certain equipment truck also used to transport containers to and from dump a function which was not incidental or remote E. holding that a truck drivers injury from a fall in the shower of a truck stop while off duty was not compensable

assistant: The best answer is D. holding garbage truck was not mobile equipment under similar definition because it was designed or maintained for sole purpose of providing mobility to certain equipment truck also used to transport containers to and from dump a function which was not incidental or remote
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the parties hereto shall perform such further acts and execute such further documents as may reasonably be necessary to carry out and give full effect to the provisions of this Agreement and the intentions of the parties as reflected thereby.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: It has been duly organized in, and is validly existing as a limited liability company in good standing under the Applicable Laws of its jurisdiction of organization, with all requisite power and authority to own its properties and to conduct its business as such properties are presently owned and such business is presently conducted, except to the extent that such failure would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Organizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: on December 7, 1990. Since Hodari D. was not decided by the Supreme Court until April 23, 1991, the district court did not have the benefit of its guidance in ruling on these motions. Hodari D.’s predecessors include Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 328-32, 110 S.Ct. 2412, 2415-17, 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990) (defining and distinguishing the government’s burdens regarding reasonable suspicion and probable cause); Brower v. Inyo County, 489 U.S. 593, 596, 109 S.Ct. 1378, 1381-83, 103 L.Ed.2d 628 (1989) (where a suspect was caught when stolen car he was driving at high speeds to elude pursuing police, crashed into police roadblock, holding there was not a "stop” until the suspect crashed into a blockade); United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 9, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 1586, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989) (<HOLDING>). 9 . See Brower, 489 U.S. at 596, 109 S.Ct. at Options: A. holding that factors that ordinarily constitute innocent behavior may provide a composite picture sufficient to raise reasonable suspicion B. holding innocent facts when considered together can give rise to reasonable suspicion C. holding that such factors may constitute a substantial burden D. holding that while each separate item standing alone did not provide reasonable suspicion a combination of factors clearly satisfied the reasonable suspicion requirement E. holding that factors which by themselves were quite consistent with innocent travel collectively amounted to reasonable suspicion

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that factors that ordinarily constitute innocent behavior may provide a composite picture sufficient to raise reasonable suspicion
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: health evaluators, whether consciously or otherwise, from simply ratifying or ‘rubber stamping’ one another’s findings,” Commitment of Alleged Mentally Disordered Person, 181 Ariz. 290, 292, 889 P.2d 1088, 1090 (1995), requires it. Furthermore, in Pais, our supreme court stated, “[w]e can think of few cases in the field of medicine wherein [an] actual physical examination of the patient would be more beneficial than in psychiatric evaluation. Psychiatric evaluation of a patient is concerned not only with the ‘science’ of psychiatry but also the ‘art’ of examination.” 108 Ariz. at 70, 492 P.2d at 1177 (reviewing claim for emotional and depressive reaction to hand injury); see also Maricopa County Superior Court No. MH 2002-000767, 205 Ariz. 296, 299, ¶ 14, 69 P.3d 1017, 1020 (App.2003) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 17 Based on the language of the statute and Options: A. recognizing that observations made during a psychiatric examination contain a subjective element B. recognizing as an element of pain and suffering C. holding that failure to instruct on an essential element was harmless error because the element was so clearly established D. holding that use of volunteer jurors introduced an impermissible subjective element into jury selection E. holding the connection is an element

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing that observations made during a psychiatric examination contain a subjective element
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower agrees to indemnify each of the Bank, each legal entity, if any, who controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Bank, and each of their respective directors, officers and employees (the “ Indemnified Parties ”), and to defend and hold each Indemnified Party harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities and expenses (including all fees and charges of internal or external counsel with whom any Indemnified Party may consult and all expenses of litigation and preparation therefor) which any Indemnified Party may incur or which may be asserted against any Indemnified Party by any person, entity or governmental authority (including any person or entity claiming derivatively on behalf of the Borrower), in connection with or arising out of or relating to the matters referred to in this Note or in the other Loan Documents or the use of any advance hereunder, whether (a) arising from or incurred in connection with any breach of a representation, warranty or covenant by the Borrower, or (b) arising out of or resulting from any suit, action, claim, proceeding or governmental investigation, pending or threatened, whether based on statute, regulation or order, or tort, or contract or otherwise, before any court or governmental authority; provided , however , that the foregoing indemnity agreement shall not apply to any claims, damages, losses, liabilities and expenses solely attributable to an Indemnified Party's gross negligence or willful misconduct. The indemnity agreement contained in this Section shall survive the termination of this Note, payment of any advance hereunder and the assignment of any rights hereunder. The Borrower may participate at its expense in the defense of any such action or claim.

assistant: Indemnity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No amendment, modification, supplement or waiver of any provision of this Agreement, or consent to any departure from the terms of this Agreement by any Party hereto shall be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by all the Parties hereto, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 2. All the information that (ii) is disclosed verbally, and at the time of its disclosure, the Disclosing Party's identify such information to be protected in accordance with this Agreement ("Confidential Information"), shall be considered confidential and restricted property of the Disclosing Party. 3. The term "Information" shall include all written information, verbal or otherwise presented in tangible or intangible way, including, but not limited to, trade secrets, discoveries, ideas, concepts, know-how, techniques, technology, products, designs, specifications, drawings, diagrams, data, computer programs, business activities and operations, reports, studies and other technical, commercial, financial information of each Party or its Affiliates.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and no Justification?”). 7 . See, e.g., App. 65 ("[T]hey do not give a reason why I have to have an interview. They give no real reason why I cannot renounce my citizenship while in prison.”). 8 . The government states that, although this circuit "previously suggested in dicta that the Government might have an obligation to act on applications to renounce,” Gov’t Br. 13 n. 9 (citing Kaufman, 524 F.3d at 1339), "this dicta is not persuasive,” id. This constitutes an argument about the merits, upon which Schnitzler may or may not ultimately prevail. But as we note below, his "prospects of success” on such a claim are "not pertinent to the mootness inquiry.” Chafin v. Chafin, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1017, 1024, 185 L.Ed.2d 1 (2013). 9 . Cf. Fox v. Clinton, 684 F.3d 67, 80 (D.C.Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>); Turner v. Beers, No. 13-504, 5 F.Supp.3d 115, Options: A. holding that for diversity purposes the citizenship of a llc is determined by the citizenship of all of its members B. holding that because exclusion was not provided to certificate holder terms of the certificate controlled C. holding that the state departments denial of the appellants request for a certificate of loss of nationality that would acknowledge his surrender of us citizenship was arbitrary and capricious because it was not logical rational or adequately explained D. holding that the certificate of purchase is not a claim because it does not represent a right to payment E. holding that denial of untimely request was not abuse of discretion

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the state departments denial of the appellants request for a certificate of loss of nationality that would acknowledge his surrender of us citizenship was arbitrary and capricious because it was not logical rational or adequately explained
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to the suit in which he is appointed, and the receiver is not appointed for the benefit of any party_”) 16 . RCW § 7.60.040 provides: "[t]he receiver shall have power, under control of the court, to bring and defend actions, to take and keep possession of the property, to receive rents, collect debts, and generally to do such acts respecting the property, as the court may authorize.” 17 . RCW § 7.60.030 provides: Before entering upon his duties, the receiver must be sworn to perform them faithfully, and with one or more sureties, approved by the court, execute a bond to such person as the court may direct, conditioned that he will faithfully discharge the duties of receiver in the action, and obey the orders of the court therein. 18 . See also, Bennett v. Williams, 892 F.2d at 824 (<HOLDING>). 19 . The general definition is in CERCLA § Options: A. holding that individual defendants may not be held liable for violations under title vii B. holding that a municipality may be held liable as a person under 1983 C. holding that no judgment can be rendered against defendant who cannot be held liable D. holding that bankruptcy trustees shall not be held liable for mistakes within reasonable business judgment E. holding that employer may be held liable under 1981 for discrimination by supervisory employee

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that bankruptcy trustees shall not be held liable for mistakes within reasonable business judgment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: a vehicle involved in a crash occurring on public or private property which results in the death of a person shall immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the crash, or as close thereto as possible, and shall remain at the scene of the crash until he or she has fulfilled the requirements of s. 316.062. § 316.027(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012). At trial, the defendant moved for the entry of a judgment of acquittal (JOA), arguing that the State failed to prove that a crash occurred between the defendant’s car and the victim. The State countered, arguing that the crash was between the victim and the pavement. The trial court determined that there was no evidence that the victim was hit by the car, but denied the JOA motion in reliance on State v. Gaulden, 134 So.3d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (<HOLDING>). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Options: A. holding that it was impermissible for an officer to question a driver about matters unrelated to the traffic stop after the officer had fulfilled the purpose of the stop by issuing a written warning to the driver B. holding that police officer may order passengers to remain in vehicle with hands up during traffic stop C. holding that passengers collision with road was a crash and thus driver was subject to prosecution for failing to stop D. holding that passengers of a vehicle which they did not own had standing to challenge the validity of a traffic stop E. holding that an officer making a traffic stop may order passengers to exit the car pending completion of the stop

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that passengers collision with road was a crash and thus driver was subject to prosecution for failing to stop
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: employment-related connection to a vessel in navigation,” Ckandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347, 357, 115 5. Ct. 2172, 2184, 132 L.Ed.2d 314 (1995) (quotations omitted). The Stewart Court held that, although it was idle, with one scow at sea and the other without a working engine, the Super Scoop was a vessel in navigation because it “had not been taken out of service, permanently anch “repairs,” the “necessaries” for which maritime liens are authorized under the Federal Maritime Lien Act specifically include towage. See 46 U.S.C. § 31301(4). Although she could not self-propel, the BETTY LYN II could be towed upon 24 hours notice. Nor does the fact that the BETTY LYN II was drydocked for the repairs divest her of vessel status. See N. Pac. S.S. Co., 249 U.S. at 128, 39 S.Ct. at 224 (<HOLDING>); Jones v. One Fifty Foot Gulfstar Motor Options: A. holding that rule 4 displaced service provision in the admiralty act B. holding that courts apply substantive admiralty law to claims that sound in admiralty regardless of whether the complaint invokes diversity or admiralty jurisdiction C. holding that admiralty jurisdiction extends to maritime insurance contracts D. holding that admiralty jurisdiction extended to an action for ship repairs performed in drydock because there is no difference in character as to repairs made upon the hull of a vessel dependent upon whether they are made while she is afloat while in dry dock or while hauled up by ways upon land the nature of the service is identical in the several cases and the admiralty jurisdiction extends to all E. holding that a complaint that asserts both admiralty jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction is not an adequate 9h designation to trigger admiralty procedures

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that admiralty jurisdiction extended to an action for ship repairs performed in drydock because there is no difference in character as to repairs made upon the hull of a vessel dependent upon whether they are made while she is afloat while in dry dock or while hauled up by ways upon land the nature of the service is identical in the several cases and the admiralty jurisdiction extends to all
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to the plaintiff. “A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Roy v. City of Augusta, Maine, 712 F.2d 1517, 1522 (1st Cir.1983). IV. ANALYSIS A plaintiff cannot bring an unlawful discrimination action in federal court under Mass. Gen. L. ch. 151B unless she has first filed a compl nistrative charge will survive if it “is reasonably within the scope of an agency investigation of [the] administrative charge.” Lattimore, 99 F.3d at 464. This scope-of-the-investigation rule “reflects the idea that the scope of a civil action is not de 4-75 (D.Mass.1998) (<HOLDING>). On the other hand, the rule precludes a Options: A. holding that a plaintiff could not add civil claim based upon different facts that are separate and distinct both qualitatively and temporally and relate to the conduct of different individuals from facts in administrative charge B. holding sexual harassment claim was not like or related to retaliation allegations and therefore was outside the scope of the administrative charge C. holding that plaintiff who filed administrative charge for racial harassment and discrimination could add claim for retaliation because some of the same facts supported both types of claims D. holding that discrimination and retaliation claims are considered distinct types of claims that must be raised independently if the retaliation occurred prior to the filing of the administrative charge E. holding defense applicable to both types of claims

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that plaintiff who filed administrative charge for racial harassment and discrimination could add claim for retaliation because some of the same facts supported both types of claims