flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Upon any termination of employment, the Executive shall promptly resign from any positions with the Company, whether as an officer, director, employee, or otherwise and shall promptly execute any documents reasonably required to effectuate the resignation. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Executive acknowledges and agrees that any and all payments to which the Executive is entitled under Section 2.2, Section 4 or Section 13, other than payment of any Final Compensation, are conditioned upon and subject to the Executive’s (or his estate’s) execution, delivery and non-revocation within fifty-five (55) days following the Executive’s termination of employment of a general waiver and release (for the avoidance of doubt, the restrictive covenants contained or referred to in Section 5, 6 and 7 of this Agreement shall survive the termination of this Agreement), in substantially the form delivered to the Executive in connection with the execution of this Agreement, of all claims, except for such matters covered by provisions of this Agreement which expressly survive the termination of this Agreement (the “Release Condition”). Payments and benefits of amounts which do not constitute nonqualified deferred compensation and are therefore not subject to Section 409A (as defined below) shall commence five (5) days after the Release Condition is satisfied and payments and benefits which are subject to Section 409A shall commence on the 60 th day after termination of employment (subject to further delay, if required pursuant to Section 3.9 above) provided that the Release Condition is satisfied.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of the Loan Documents to which it is a party by it, and has the power and authority to execute, deliver and perform under the Loan Documents and all the transactions contemplated thereby. The Loan Documents to which Borrower is a party have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by Borrower and constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of Borrower, enforceable against Borrower in accordance with their respective terms, except as such enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally, and by general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). The Loan Documents are not subject to any right of rescission, set-off, counterclaim or defense by Borrower or Guarantor, including the defense of usury, nor would the operation of any of the terms of the Loan Documents, or the exercise of any right thereunder, render the Loan Documents unenforceable, and none of Borrower or Guarantor have asserted any right of rescission, set-off, counterclaim or defense with respect thereto.

assistant: Enforceability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: airbnb may without restriction assign , transfer or delegate this agreement and any rights and obligations hereunder , at its sole discretion , with 30 days prior notice .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been duly given or made only if (i) delivered personally or by overnight courier, (ii) delivered by facsimile transmission with answer back confirmation, (iii) mailed (postage prepaid by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested) (effective upon actual receipt), or (iv) delivered by electronic communication to the address below. An electronic communication (“ Electronic Notice ”) shall be deemed written notice for purposes of this letter if sent with return receipt requested to the electronic mail address specified by the receiving party. Electronic Notice shall be deemed received at the time the party sending Electronic Notice receives verification of receipt by the receiving party. The party receiving Electronic Notice may request and shall be entitled to receive the notice on paper, in a non-electronic form (“ Non-electronic Notice ”) which shall be sent to the requesting party within five days after receipt of the written request for Non-electronic Notice. Either party from time to time may change its address, facsimile number, electronic mail address, or other information for the purpose of notices to that party by giving written notice specifying such change to the other party hereto.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment and the Loan Documents represent the entire agreement about this subject matter and supersede prior negotiations or agreements with respect to such subject matter. All prior agreements, understandings, representations, warranties, and negotiations between the parties about the subject matter of this Amendment and the Loan Documents merge into this Agreement and the Loan Documents.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Bronster, 82 Hawai’i at 40, 919 P.2d at 302. “Such damage means simply that the product has not met the customer’s expectations, or, in other words, that the customer has received ‘insufficient product value.’ ” Id. (citation omitted). Under the economic loss rule, “a manufacturer in a commercial relationship has no duty under either a negligence or strict products liability theory to prevent a product from injuring itself.” Leis Family Ltd. P’ship v. Silversword Eng’rg, 126 Hawai’i 532, 538-39, 273 P.3d 1218, 1224-25 (Haw.Ct.App.2012) (quoting Bronster, 82 Hawai’i at 39, 919 P.2d at 301). The rule also applies to negligent design and/or manufacture theory, Bronster, 82 Hawai’i at 40, 919 P.2d at 302, and negligent misrepresentation. City Express, 87 Hawai’i at 470, 959 P.2d at 840 (<HOLDING>). The most recent Hawaii Supreme Court case Options: A. holding that claims alleging negligent misrepresentation and failure to disclose seek economic damages not property damages within insureds policy B. holding that an architect whose negligent design and supervision of construction render a building unfit for use may be liable in tort to a commercial tenant who suffers economic loss as a result C. holding that in the context of construction litigation regarding the alleged negligence of design professionals a tort action for negligent misrepresentation alleging damages based purely on economic loss is not available to a party in privity of contract with a design professional D. holding economic loss rule did not bar negligent misrepresentation claim where parties had no contract E. holding that the economic loss doctrine barred a negligence claim without regard to whether the parties were in privity of contract

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that in the context of construction litigation regarding the alleged negligence of design professionals a tort action for negligent misrepresentation alleging damages based purely on economic loss is not available to a party in privity of contract with a design professional
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: background nor his current offense can support the conclusion that he is a worst offender. The maximum sentence was therefore not justified. In deciding to impose the maximum sentence, Judge Michalski relied primarily on his conclusion that Skrepich was incapable of rehabilitation and could not personally be deterred. The judge thus gave primary emphasis to the need to protect the public by isolating Skrepich from the community. While the judge also indicated that a lengthy sentence would serve the sentencing goals of general deterrence and community condemnation, it seems clear that these goals could not, in themselves, support the imposition of a maximum, ten-year term for a first offender convicted of a class B felony. See Pears v. State, 698 P.2d 1198, 1204-05 (Alaska 1985) (<HOLDING>). The appropriateness of the maximum term Options: A. holding that the district courts failure to explain the effect of supervised release was harmless where the maximum term of incarceration under the actual sentence of imprisonment and supervised release less than six years as well as his worstcase scenario less than nine years was less than the maximum term of incarceration twenty years al lowed by law B. holding that a defendant may be convicted of felony murder when the death of his accomplice was a reasonably foreseeable result of their commission of a felony C. holding that first and seconddegree intentional murder verdicts are consistent with a felony murder verdict because lack of intent is not an element of seconddegree felony murder D. holding that a term of substantially less than twenty years would serve the objectives of general deterrence and community condemnation in the case of a first offender convicted of seconddegree murder an unclassified felony E. holding that twenty years was not excessive for second felony offender convicted of simple burglary

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a term of substantially less than twenty years would serve the objectives of general deterrence and community condemnation in the case of a first offender convicted of seconddegree murder an unclassified felony
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: interest of safety and security at the institution. Accordingly, the order of the district court denying Hyde’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed in part and reversed in part. Chief Judge LANSING and Judge PERRY concur. 1 . Roles was addressed in the context of FERPA. However, as we discuss below, there is no distinction between FERPA’s compelling govern mental interest standard and that embodied in RLUIPA. 2 .Some states along with the Federal Bureau of Prisons allow sweat lodges and other Native American religious practices at maximum security prisons. See Pounders v. Kempker, 79 Fed. Appx. 941, 943 n. 2 (8th Cir.2003) (noting that Missouri eventually built a sweat lodge at its maximum security Potosi Correctional Center); Allen v. Toombs, 827 F.2d 563 (9th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>); Morrison v. Cook, 1999 WL 717218, *4 (D.Or. Options: A. holding that removal from house arrest and return to general prison population was a matter of inmate classification B. holding that africanamerican plaintiffs claims that defendants should have known that placing him in a jail with a large population of white inmates put him at risk of being attacked were without merit because the plaintiff had not alleged any specific facts which would show that he was in danger of being assaulted by the other inmates C. holding that prison conditions are those aspects of prison life affecting the entire prison population D. recognizing general rule E. recognizing that general population inmates at oregon maximum security prison were allowed to participate in weekly sweat lodge ceremonies

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing that general population inmates at oregon maximum security prison were allowed to participate in weekly sweat lodge ceremonies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: sponte, the general rule is that it must first issue an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed to give the lawyer or party an opportunity to explain his or her conduct.”) (citation omitted). Additionally, the district court lacked authority to impose sanctions for pleadings filed in state court prior to removal. See Buster v. Greisen, 104 F.3d 1186, 1190 n. 4 (9th Cir.1997) (explaining that a party may be sanctioned by the district court based on pleading filed in state court only if the party urges the allegations of those pleadings after removal). Finally, Liberty did not engage in sanctionable conduct by amending her client’s complaint to include a civil rights claim. See Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 401-02, 110 S.Ct. 2447, 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990) (<HOLDING>). In sum, the district court abused its Options: A. recognizing that reasonable time limitations may be placed on the exercise of constitutional rights B. holding statute of limitations should not be equitably tolled for taxpayer who filed a refund claim after the applicable statute of limitations C. recognizing that statute of limitations questions may be resolved on a motion to dismiss D. recognizing that a prefiling investigation that might otherwise be unreasonable may be reasonable where the attorney has limited time to prepare pleadings before the applicable statute of limitations expires E. recognizing only specific limited forms of pleadings

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing that a prefiling investigation that might otherwise be unreasonable may be reasonable where the attorney has limited time to prepare pleadings before the applicable statute of limitations expires
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Certificates of insurance evidencing the existence of all insurance required to be maintained by Borrower pursuant to Section 8.05(b) and the designation of Administrative Agent as the lender’s loss payees or additional named insured, as the case may be, thereunder.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower has disclosed to the Lenders all agreements, instruments, and corporate or other restrictions to which the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries is subject, and all other matters known to any of them, that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. None of the reports (including without limitation all reports that the Borrower is required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission), financial statements, certificates or other written information furnished by or on behalf of the Borrower to the Administrative Agent or any Lender in connection with the negotiation or syndication of this Agreement or any other Loan Document or delivered hereunder or thereunder (as modified or supplemented by any other information so furnished) contains any material misstatement of fact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, taken as a whole, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided , that with respect to projected financial information, the Borrower represents only that such information was prepared in good faith based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall use the net proceeds from the sale of the Notes (after deducting fees and expenses (including brokerage fees, legal fees and expenses and fees payable to the Escrow Agent)) for working capital and general corporate purposes.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notices, consents, waivers or other communications required or permitted to be given under the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and will be deemed to have been delivered: (i) upon receipt, when delivered personally; (ii) upon receipt, when sent by facsimile (provided confirmation of transmission is mechanically or electronically generated and kept on file by the sending party); (iii) upon confirmation of transmission, when sent by email; or (iv) one business day after deposit with an overnight courier service, in each case properly addressed to the party to receive the same. The addresses and facsimile numbers for such communications shall be (A) if to the Company, at the address set forth on its signature page attached hereto or (B) if to the Creditor, at the address set forth on its signature page attached hereto, or to such other address and/or facsimile number and/or to the attention of such other Person as the recipient party has specified by written notice given to each other party five (5) days prior to the effectiveness of such change. Written confirmation of receipt (x) given by the recipient of such notice, consent, waiver or other communication, (y) mechanically or electronically generated by the sender’s facsimile machine containing the time, date, recipient facsimile number and an image of the first page of such transmission or (z) provided by an overnight courier service shall be rebuttable evidence of personal service, receipt by facsimile or receipt from an overnight courier service in accordance with clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above, respectively.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: In the appropriate circumstances, Rule 36(b) provides for the withdrawal or amendment of admissions. This section reads as follows: Subject to the provision of Rule 16 governing amendment of a pre-trial order, the court may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the party who obtained the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice that party in maintaining the action or defense on the merits. When a party seeks leave to file untimely answers, the test to be applied by the Court is whether permitting the party to answer will aid in the presentation of the merits of the action and whether prejudice will accrue to the propounding party. Davis v. Noufal, 142 F.R.D. 258 (D.D.C.1992) (<HOLDING>); McClanahan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 144 F.R.D. Options: A. holding portions of summary judgment motion in abeyance pending an evidentiary hearing B. holding that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea was not pending because nothing was left for the court to decide C. holding plaintiff could withdraw admissions despite pending motion by defendants for summary judgment D. holding that district court has discretion under appropriate circumstances to rule on summary judgment motion before addressing pending class certification motion E. holding that the trial court did not err by granting defendants motion for summary judgment

assistant: The best answer is C. holding plaintiff could withdraw admissions despite pending motion by defendants for summary judgment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall pay the Executive a base salary at the annual rate of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000), which shall be paid in accordance with the normal payroll practices of the Company and shall be subject to applicable withholdings and deductions. Thereafter, the Executive’s base salary shall be subject to review and adjustment upward by the compensation committee (the “ Compensation Committee ”) of the Board of Directors on or about each anniversary of the Effective Date for each year during the Employment Term (as adjusted from time-to-time, the “ Base Salary ”).

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Within 60 days of the death of a Participant, the Bank shall pay the Participant’s Beneficiary the balance (or the remaining balance, in case of Participant receiving installment payments) of Participant’s Deferred Compensation Account in a single lump sum.

assistant: Death
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: this opinion. [15] Reversed and remanded. MAY, J„ and BRADFORD, J., concur. 1 . The Deputies' spouses were parties to the original action as plaintiffs, each seeking damages for loss of consortium. However, the spouses’ claims were voluntarily dismissed in December 2014. 2 . 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 states in pertinent part, Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any State ... subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other property proceeding for red v. Clark, 548 P.2d 902, 906 (Utah 1976) (<HOLDING>); Unnever v. Stephens, 142 Ga.App. 787, 236 Options: A. holding that under the law of the district of columbia the filing of a complaint does not toll the statute of limitations on a counterclaim B. holding that where counterclaim arises out of same transaction alleged in plaintiffs complaint is not barred by a running of the statute of limitations thereafter rather statute of limitations is suspended until counterclaim is filed C. holding that a compulsory counterclaim was barred by pennsylvanias twoyear statute of limitations notwithstanding that the plaintiff filed his complaint late in the twoyear limitations period D. holding that the running of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense E. holding that the institution of plaintiffs suit tolls or suspends the running of the statute of limitations governing a compulsory counterclaim

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that where counterclaim arises out of same transaction alleged in plaintiffs complaint is not barred by a running of the statute of limitations thereafter rather statute of limitations is suspended until counterclaim is filed
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Stat. § 286.011(1), prevented the Board from delegating authority because, under that law, all decisions affecting the Board must be made at a public meeting. We agree with the argument of Citigroup that Florida law permitted the Board to delegate to Adams the authority to agree to arbitrate disputes under the consulting contract. Citigroup argues persuasively that general principles of administrative law govern the Board, which is a municipal agency; those general principles of administrative law permit delegation; and because no Florida law prohibits the sort of delegation at issue, the Board could delegate its authority. The Board has offered no reason to doubt this argument about Florida law. Cf. W.M. Schlosser Co. v. Sch. Bd. of Fairfax Cnty., Va., 980 F.2d 253, 258 (4th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); Morgan v. S. Bend Cmty. Sch. Corp., 797 F.2d Options: A. holding unconscionable an arbitration agreement requiring employees to arbitrate claims against the employer but not requiring the employer to arbitrate claims against the employees B. holding that an action to compel arbitration accrues only when the respondent unequivocally refuses to arbitrate either by failing to comply with an arbitration demand or by otherwise unambiguously manifesting an intention not to arbitrate the subject matter of the dispute C. holding that purpose of stay pending arbitration is twofold it relieves the party entitled to arbitrate of the burden of continuing to litigate the issue while the arbitration process is ongoing and it entitles that party to proceed immediately to arbitration without the delay that would be occasioned by an appeal of the district courts order to arbitrate D. holding that parties to an arbitration agreement need not equally bind each other with respect to an arbitration agreement if they have provided each other with consideration beyond the promise to arbitrate E. holding that agent could not bind board to arbitrate because state law affirmatively prohibited arbitration

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that agent could not bind board to arbitrate because state law affirmatively prohibited arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to the other terms and conditions of this Amendment, the Administrative Agent and the Lenders hereby waive the Specified Event of Default. The above waiver shall not modify or affect the Credit Parties’ obligations to comply fully with the other terms of the Credit Agreement or any other duty, term, condition or covenant contained in the Credit Agreement or any other Credit Document. The waiver is limited solely to the Specified Event of Default, and nothing contained in this Amendment shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other Default or Event of Default that may exist (other than the Specified Event of Default) or any other rights or remedies the Administrative Agent or any Lender may have under the Credit Agreement or any other Credit Documents or under applicable law.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the statutory policy of “furthering the successful pi-osecution of meritorious claims” was best served by a rule that “creates an incentive to retain counsel in every such case.” Id. at 438, 111 S.Ct. 1435. Permitting a fee award to a pro se litigant, even one who is a lawyer, would instead “create a disincentive to employ counsel.” Id. Accordingly the Supreme Court held that pro se lawyers did not fall within the scope of the fee-shifting provision. Although Kay was decided pursuant to section 1988, its reasoning is not confined to that statute. Indeed, both this Court and other “courts of appeals have [since Kay] denied attorney’s fees to pro se attorneys under a variety of fee-shifting statutes .... ” Zucker v. Westinghouse Elec., 374 F.3d 221, 228-29 (3d Cir.2004); see id. at 229 (<HOLDING>); see also SEC v. Price Waterhouse, 41 F.3d Options: A. holding that attorneys fee award in a common fund case must be reasonable under the circumstances B. holding attorneys fees not available to pro se attorney litigant in a federal freedom of information act action C. holding that attorney fees awarded under the common fund doctrine do not constitute part of a plaintiffs claim against the defendant and cannot be considered for amountincontroversy purposes D. holding that a pro se litigant who is an attorney is not entitled to fees under 1988 E. holding that a shareholderobjector who represents himself as a pro se lawyer is not entitled to attorneys fees under the common fund doctrine

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a shareholderobjector who represents himself as a pro se lawyer is not entitled to attorneys fees under the common fund doctrine
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: because the mortgagee’s interests were for specific amounts and; its interests would be unaffected by any judgment in the case. Id. The court concluded that, Complete rélief can be accorded between plaintiff and defendant without the presence of the mortgagee... [its] absence will not impair [its] ability to protect [its] interests ... nor will it create any difference in the obligations of the existing parties that may stem from this action that would not otherwise exist. Id. at 538. Here, as in Thompson, Cintron’s interest as mortgagee are that the mortgage debt be paid and that the property not be destroyed. See, e.g., id.; see also Bosteve Ltd., 110 F.R.D. at 260. Those interests are protected regardless of the outcome of the partition action. Bosteve Ltd., 110 F.R.D. at 260 (<HOLDING>). In this case, the parties’ obligation under Options: A. holding that a claim for interest on a money judgment did not accrue until the judgment was rendered which was the date on which the trial court issued its order B. holding prejudgment interest is to be determined on the entire amount of compensatory damages and then reduced by the amount of interest which would have accrued at present value on the settlement amount determined before trial C. holding that mortgagees interest in an action for a mortgaged yacht was unaffected by judgment where its interest was the specific amount of the loan D. holding that where payment toward judgment was for less than the total amount of principal and interest owed that payment then did not terminate the accrual of interest on the remaining principal E. holding that when an oversecured creditor seeks interest on its claim courts apply the interest rate provided for in the contract

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that mortgagees interest in an action for a mortgaged yacht was unaffected by judgment where its interest was the specific amount of the loan
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: is that any person — may it be a parent, school system employee, or concerned citizen while on school premises or a school bus — who dares to speak critically to school officials at any time in the presence of minors must leave the premises when so ordered by a school official or face arrest and prosecution for a misdemeanor. Though the statute ostensibly only criminalizes the speech after the speaker refuses to leave school premises, the result is the same: the speaker is silenced, either through his or her absence on the school premises or school bus or through subsequent prosecution, based on the content of his or her speech, be it at a high school football game or a parent-teacher conference. Cf. Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U. S. 781 (109 SCt 2746, 105 LE2d 661) (1989) (<HOLDING>). Decided October 31, 2016. Jason R. Clark; Options: A. holding that even in a public forum the government may impose reasonable restrictions on the time place or manner of protected speech provided the restrictions are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech that they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest and that they leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information B. recognizing that time place and manner restrictions must be content neutral C. holding that a quick look analysis was inappropriate for restrictions imposed by professional association of dentists on member advertising where the likelihood of noncompetitive effects of restrictions were not obvious and restrictions could plausibly be thought to have procompetitive effect on competition D. holding restrictions embodied in content neutral statute must be narrowly tailored to serve significant government interest while leaving open sufficient alternative channels of communication E. recognizing prudential concerns underlying antitrust standing restrictions

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that time place and manner restrictions must be content neutral
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under all applicable laws and regulations. If, however, any provision of this Agreement shall be prohibited by or invalid under any such law or regulation in any jurisdiction, it shall, as to such jurisdiction, be deemed modified to conform to the minimum requirements of such law or regulation, or, if for any reason it is not deemed so modified, it shall be ineffective and invalid only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity without affecting the remaining provisions of this Agreement or the validity or effectiveness of such provision in any other jurisdiction.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notices, requests, demands and other communications provided for by this Agreement shall be sufficient if in writing and delivered in person or sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier service or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the Executive at the last address the Executive has filed in writing with the Company (with a copy to his counsel, Henry Morgenbesser, Esq. of Katzke & Morgenbesser LLP, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 11 th Floor, New York, NY 10105) or, in the case of the Company, at its main offices, attention of the Board.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (quoting United States v. Kinder, 335 F.3d 1132, 1141 (10th Cir.2003)). This would include an objection on venue grounds. See United States v. Price, 447 F.2d 23, 27 (2d Cir.1971) (finding if defendant “specifies grounds for acquittal but is silent as to venue” at conclusion of government’s case, defendant waives venue). On the other hand, if a defendant files a general motion for acquittal that does not identify a specific point of attack, the defendant is deemed to be challenging the sufficiency of each essential element of the government’s case, including venue. See United States v. Gross, 276 F.2d 816, 818-19 (2d Cir.1960) (noting a motion for acquittal made at conclusion of evidence properly challenges the proof on venue); United States v. Browne, 225 F.2d 751, 755 (7th Cir.1955) (<HOLDING>); 2 Wright, supra, § 306, at 345-46 (“A general Options: A. holding with respect to a general motion for directed verdict that it raised the question as to the sufficiency of the evidence on venue an essential part of the governments case internal quotation marks and citation omitted B. holding that erroneous admission of evidence was harmless where it had no substantial and injurious effect or influence on the jury verdict judged in relation to the total evidence on the issue in question internal quotation marks omitted C. holding that a statute must be construed so that no part of the statute is rendered surplusage or superfluous internal quotation marks and citation omitted D. recognizing that party is not permitted to use the accident of a remand to raise an issue that it could just as well have raised in the first appeal internal quotation marks and alterations omitted E. holding that we must affirm the jurys verdict against a sufficiency challenge if there is substantial evidence taking the view most favorable to the government to support it internal quotation marks omitted

assistant: The best answer is A. holding with respect to a general motion for directed verdict that it raised the question as to the sufficiency of the evidence on venue an essential part of the governments case internal quotation marks and citation omitted
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Tenant acknowledges that the content of this Lease and any related documents are confidential information (“ Confidential Information ”). Tenant shall keep such Confidential Information strictly confidential and shall not disclose such Confidential Information to any person or entity other than to Tenant’s employees, financial, legal, real estate space planning consultants, and prospective Transferees, provided that such parties reasonably need to know such information and (i) are informed by Tenant of the confidential nature of such information and of the existence of this Paragraph 48(v) and (ii) are directed by Tenant to treat such information confidentially in accordance with this Paragraph 48(v) . The foregoing restriction shall not apply: (w) if Tenant is required to disclose the Confidential Information in response to a subpoena or other regulatory, administrative or court order, or (x) if independent legal counsel to Tenant delivers a written opinion to Landlord that Tenant is required to disclose the Confidential Information to, or file a copy of this Lease with, any governmental agency or any stock exchange, (y) in response to a request for discovery in any civil or criminal proceeding, or (z) in connection with any litigation, judicial reference, arbitration or other dispute by or between the parties.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Comply (i) with the requirements of all Laws (including the USA PATRIOT Act, the FCPA, the United Kingdom Bribery Act of 2010 and Sanctions) and (ii) with all orders, writs, injunctions and decrees of any Governmental Authority applicable to it or to its business or property, except, in each of (i) and (ii), if the failure to comply therewith would not reasonably be expected individually or in the aggregate to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the term of employment, you shall serve as Executive Vice President, Corporate Marketing & Communications of the Company and you shall have the authority, functions, duties, powers and responsibilities normally associated with such position and such additional authority, functions, duties, powers and responsibilities as may be assigned to you from time to time by the Company consistent with your senior position with the Company. During the term of employment, (i) your services shall be rendered on a substantially full-business time, exclusive basis and you will apply on a full-business time basis all of your skill and experience to the performance of your duties, (ii) you shall have no other employment and, without the prior written consent of your manager or other more senior officer of the Company in your reporting line, no outside business activities which require the devotion of substantial amounts of your time, and (iii) the place for the performance of your services shall be the principal executive offices of the Company in the New York City metropolitan area, subject to such reasonable travel as may be required in the performance of your duties. The foregoing shall be subject to the Company’s written policies, as in effect from time to time, regarding vacations, holidays, illness and the like.

assistant: Employment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parent and the Borrower shall obtain (and shall, at the request of the Facility Agent, promptly furnish certified copies to the Facility Agent of) all such authorizations, approvals, consents, licenses and exemptions as may be required under any applicable law or regulation to enable it or any Credit Party to perform its obligations under, and ensure the validity or enforceability of, each of the Credit Documents are obtained and promptly renewed from time to time and will procure that the terms of the same are complied with at all times. Insofar as such filings or registrations have not been completed on or before the Initial Borrowing Date, the Borrower will procure the filing or registration within applicable time limits of each Security Document which requires filing or registration together with all ancillary documents required to preserve the priority and enforceability of the Security Documents.

assistant: Consents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all Parties hereto had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one Agreement. This Agreement, to the extent signed and delivered by means of a facsimile machine or PDF, shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original signed agreement or instrument and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: proceeding is a core proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code and as such is equitable in nature. See id. at 1505. The court reasoned that “[a] bankruptcy discharge and questions concerning the dischargeability of certain debts, involve issues with an equitable history and for which there was no entitlement to a jury trial in the courts of England prior to the merger of law and equity.” Id. (quoting In re Hooper, 112 B.R. 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. BAP 1990)). Thus, given the equitable nature of the dischargeability proceeding, the court held that debtor was not afforded the Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury. See id. The reasoning underlying the Hallahan decision has been accepted by a legion of other federal courts. See, e.g., In re White, 222 B.R. 831, 834-35 (Bankr.W.D.Tenn.1998) (<HOLDING>); In re Tanner, Nos. 97B00073, 97A00517, 1997 Options: A. holding that dischargeability proceedings are inherently equitable in nature and as such parties are not entitled to jury trials B. holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to proceedings other than criminal trials C. holding that under the hallahan progeny of cases parties are not afforded the right to jury trials in dischargeability proceedings D. holding that juveniles are not entitled to jury trials E. holding that the bankruptcy court has constitutional and implied statutory authority to conduct jury trials in core proceedings

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that under the hallahan progeny of cases parties are not afforded the right to jury trials in dischargeability proceedings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties hereto and their respective legal counsel participated in the preparation of this Agreement, and therefore, this Agreement shall be construed neither against nor in favor of any of the parties hereto, but rather in accordance with the fair meaning thereof.

assistant: Construction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All action on the part of the Lender necessary for the authorization of the Lender to execute and deliver this Note has been taken. No consent, approval, authorization, order, filing, registration or qualification of or with any court, governmental authority or third person is required to be obtained by the Lender in connection with the execution and delivery of this Note by the Lender.

assistant: Authorizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: set aside by the district court.” 14C Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller, & Edward H. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3738 (3d ed.1998); see also 28 U. sion of the state court prior to removal as the decision of the district court that inherited the entire case upon removal. 2. The state comt did not en- in granting the motion to dismiss based on sovereign immunity. The state court dismissed all claims against the Cabinet and the two state officials in their official capacities on the basis of sovereign immunity. This was not error. Cabinet members and state officials are considered arms of the state, generally protected by sovereign immunity. Florida Dep’t. of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Florida Nursing Home Ass’n., 450 U.S. 147, 101 S.Ct. 1032, 67 L.Ed.2d 132 (1981) (<HOLDING>); Ford Motor Co. v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 323 Options: A. holding that a state may waive its sovereign immunity B. holding that the university of colorado is an arm of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity C. holding agencies of state government are part of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity D. recognizing that state agencies which are independent of the state are citizens of the state E. holding that state sovereign immunity bars state constitutional claims

assistant: The best answer is C. holding agencies of state government are part of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity