flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: act in accord with the dictates of the Constitution — and, in particular, in accord with the Due Process Clause”); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 1017, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970) (concluding that although a state may choose whether it will institute any given welfare program, it must operate whatever programs it does establish subject to the protections of the Due Process Clause); Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 18, 76 S.Ct. 585, 590, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956) (stating that while there is no constitutional right to appellate review, states that do grant appellate review must conduct proceedings in accordance with Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses). 17 .Evitts, 469 U.S. at 400-01, 105 S.Ct. at 838. 18 . Id.; see also Santosky, 455 U.S. at 753, 102 S.Ct. at 1394 (<HOLDING>). 19 . Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 24-25, 101 S.Ct. Options: A. holding that state intervention to terminate the relationship between a parent and child must be accomplished by procedures meeting the requisites of the due process clause B. recognizing the fundamental liberty interest a parent has in his or her child and concluding that the state must provide a parent with fundamentally fair procedures including a clear and convincing evidentiary standard when seeking to terminate parental rights C. holding that a state tort claim is a species of property protected by the due process clause D. holding that the requisites for in loco parentis status are the actual care and custody of a child by a nonparent who assumes parental duties because the parent generally due to his or her absence is unable or unwilling to care for the child E. holding that procedural due process does not require the jury to be instructed that a reasonable relationship must exist between the amounts of compensatory and exemplary damages

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that state intervention to terminate the relationship between a parent and child must be accomplished by procedures meeting the requisites of the due process clause
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to adjudicate Mr. DeBatto’s claims. Compl. ¶¶ 2, 4. The government initially contested this court’s jurisdiction over those claims, Def.’s Mot. at 7, referring to plaintiffs failure to cite the fact that his claims for disability retirement benefits fall within the ambit of 10 U.S.C. § 1201. Section 1201 provides that if the Secretary concludes that a service member is “unfit to perform the duties of the member’s office, grade, rank, or rating because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay ... the Secretary may retire the member.” 10 U.S.C. § 1201(a). The Federal Circuit has repeatedly held that Section 1201 is money-mandating. See Chambers, 417 F.3d at 1223-24 (citing Fisher, 402 F.3d at 1174-75); Sawyer v. United States, 930 F.2d 1577, 1580 (Fed.Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Based upon Section 1201, Mr. DeBatto can Options: A. recognizing that although provision of municipal service is not fundamental right inequitable provision of that service is subject to equal protection analysis B. holding that an attempted service on the partys counsel was insufficient without proof of the counsels actual authority to receive service C. holding that fdcpa statutory damages did not predominate over the requested equitable relief because given the defendants net worth and the number of class members each class member would be entitled to receive only 025 in statutory damages D. holding because legislature knew how to include terms within statutory definition and did not do so statutory definition did not include terms in light of the terms contemporaneous inclusion of the same terms in a separate provision E. holding that section 1201 is moneymandating and that when the terms of the statutory provision are met the service member is entitled to receive compensation

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that section 1201 is moneymandating and that when the terms of the statutory provision are met the service member is entitled to receive compensation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: award of prejudgment interest is normally left in the discretion of the trial judge. We find that the trial court did not err in assessing interest at 8%.... ” (citation omitted)). Defendants do not suggest an alternative rate of prejudgment interest, and the Court concludes that 8% is an appropriate rate under Mississippi law. Cf. Miss.Code Ann. § 75-17-1 (setting 8% per annum rate for claims on “notes, accounts and contracts”). Prejudgment interest will begin with the date the first suit was filed. See id. § 75-17-7 (establishing that prejudgment interest begins on “date determined by such judge to be fair but in no event prior to the filing of the complaint”); see also Sw. Recreational Indus., Inc. v. FieldTurf Inc., No. 01-50073, 2002 WL 32783971, at *9 (5th Cir. Aug. 13, 2002) (<HOLDING>). Finally, the Court may take judicial notice Options: A. holding that the district court erred by failing to determine and deduct the actual value of securities received by fraud victims B. holding that district court erred by failing to follow prejudgmentinterest accrual date in state statute C. holding that the district court erred in failing to properly charge the jury on defendants affirmative defenses D. holding that district court erred in failing to consider evidence of secondary considerations E. holding that a defendant waived a sentencing issue by failing to object in district court

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that district court erred by failing to follow prejudgmentinterest accrual date in state statute
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: above, Hotel Eden’s motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction or for forum non conveniens are denied. The parties should appear for a scheduling conference on May 7, 2002, at 4:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 . Travel Bound's facsimile cover sheet refers to itself as "A Gulliver’s Company.” Cert, of Andrew Jacobs, Ex. N. 2 . There is no jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute, C.P.L.R. § 302(a), because there is an insufficiently strong connection between the reservations made inside the State of New York and the tort itself (requiring that causes of action brought under § 302(a) arise out of the non-domiciliary’s contacts with New York). See Noble v. Singapore Resort Motel of Miami Beach, 21 N.Y.2d 1006, 1008, 290 N.Y.S.2d 926, 927, 238 N.E.2d 328 (1968) Options: A. holding jurisdiction over nonresident defendant existed where note was payable in new york contained new york choice of law clause and proceeds were used to finance new york limited partnership B. holding that contract signed in new york by promisor from florida and partially performed in florida was governed by new york law because it was executed in new york C. holding that two meet ings in new york and numerous telephone calls and correspondence to new york were not sufficient to confer jurisdiction D. holding that reservations made inside the state of new york were not closely related enough to alleged tort within florida hotel to warrant jurisdiction under cplr 302 E. holding new york could lawfully modify a florida custody decree because florida court had right under florida law to change the decree

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that reservations made inside the state of new york were not closely related enough to alleged tort within florida hotel to warrant jurisdiction under cplr 302
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Administrative Agent shall have received a counterpart of this Amendment which shall have been executed by the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Lender, each Lender, the Company, and the Guarantors (which may be by telecopy or PDF transmission as set forth in Section 8).

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither Borrower nor any Subsidiary thereof is in default under or with respect to any Contractual Obligation that could, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. No Default has occurred and is continuing or would result from the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any other Loan Document.

assistant: No Defaults
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. A signed copy of this Amendment delivered by facsimile, e-mail or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Amendment.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you are located in the eu , you consent that the supply of the digital content may begin immediately following the completion of your purchase and you acknowledge that you therefore will lose any statutory rights that you may have to withdraw and receive a refund .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower will not, nor will it permit any Subsidiary to, enter into any arrangement, directly or indirectly, whereby it shall sell or transfer any property, real or personal, used or useful in its business, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, and thereafter rent or lease such property or other property that it intends to use for substantially the same purpose or purposes as the property sold or transferred, except for any such sale of any fixed or capital assets by the Borrower or any Subsidiary that is made for cash consideration in an amount not less than the fair value of such fixed or capital asset and is consummated within 180 days after the Borrower or such Subsidiary acquires or completes the construction of such fixed or capital asset; provided that, if such sale and leaseback results in a Capital Lease Obligation, such Capital Lease Obligation is permitted by Section 6.01(a)(v) and any Lien made the subject of such Capital Lease Obligation is permitted by Section 6.02(a)(v).

assistant: Sales
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, including the Prior Voting Agreement. Any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived if, but only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and is signed, in the case of an amendment, by each party to this Agreement, or, in the case of a waiver, by the party against whom the waiver is to be effective. No waiver of any provisions hereof by either party shall be deemed a waiver of any other provisions hereof by such party, nor shall any such waiver be deemed a continuing waiver of any provision hereof by such party.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: we will make the reimbursement using the same means of payment as you used for the initial transaction , unless you have expressly agreed otherwise ; in any event , you will not incur any fees as result of the reimbursement .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: I respectfully dissent. By ignoring the heart of appellant’s complaint, the majority makes an easy case for themselves. Rather than squarely reaching all issues raised by appellant, the majority couches appellant’s challenge to Judge Hughes’ competency to hear appellant’s motion for new trial only in terms of the trial judge having knowledge of relevant facts. While appellant makes this challenge, he also asserts that he was denied due process because Judge Hughes testified at a hearing over which she presided denied him the right to an impartial hearing. I believe that the potential for partiality inherent in Judge Hughes’ conduct runs afoul of the structural due process protections of the Constitution. See In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 135, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955). (<HOLDING>). Judge Hughes’ conduct, therefore, impacts Options: A. holding that treatment as a child is not a constitutional right but a right granted by the legislature and statute met basic due process requirements B. recognizing that the preservation requirement applies even to issues of due process when there has been a clear opportunity to present the argument on appeal to the lower tribunal C. holding basic elements of due process are notice and a right to be heard D. holding that an alien is entitled to the fifth amendment guarantee of due process which is satisfied by a full and fair hearing E. holding that a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: sentencing him to life imprisonment was not erroneous. C. The district court’s failure to consider making Sanchez’s life sentence concurrent with his state term of imprisonment Sanchez argues that the district court erred in finding that it lacked discretion to make his federal life sentence concurrent with his current state term of imprisonment. The government concedes that the district court erred in finding it had no discretion, 2003 WL 22706781 at *275; see also United States v. Arellano-Torres, 303 F.3d 1173, 1181 (9th Cir.2002), but argues that any error is harmless because Sanchez will spend the rest of his life in prison whether the federal sentence runs concurrent with or consecutive to his state sentence. See United States v. Mendoza, 121 F.3d 510, 513-14 (9th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). In light of the government’s concession that Options: A. holding that prejudice is shown where a sentencing error may affect the determination of sentence B. holding that sentencing error is harmless if the error did not affect the district courts selection of the sentence imposed C. holding that an incorrect guidelines calculation generally requires a remand for resentencing unless we conclude on the record as a whole that the error did not affect the district courts selection of the sentence imposed citation omitted D. recognizing that if a guidelines error did not affect the district courts selection of the sentence imposed the sentence should be affirmed E. holding that an error is harmless where it is highly probably that the error did not affect the outcome of the case

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that sentencing error is harmless if the error did not affect the district courts selection of the sentence imposed
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: The elements for a breach of contract action are: “the existence of a contract, a. breach thereof, and damages.” Miller v. Nifakos, 655 So.2d 192, 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (per curiam). With respect to breach of the Molson agreement, Anthony fails to point to any record evidence of an “agreement.” In fact, Salvatore Anthony Italiano testified that Anthony was not entitled to rights to Molson under the distributorship, or any other, agreement. (Exhibit E, p. 440). Even if the evidence somehow supported a finding of an agreement, the Court agrees with Miller that any separate, oral distributorship agreement would be unenforceable under Florida’s Statute of Frauds, Fla.Stat § 725.01 (1995). All Brand Importers, Inc., v. Tampa Crown Distributors, Inc., 864 F.2d 748, 749 (11th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). The Court rejects Anthony’s bare assertion Options: A. holding that section 72501 bars enforcement of an oral contract that was intended by a distributor and its customer to last longer than a year even though the contract could have been terminated for cause within a year B. holding that a termination clause allowing for termination of a distributorship contract at the end of any year could not be modified by the duty of good faith even though the manufacturer relied on the contract and invested 1 million in facilitating the needs of the contract C. holding that where an oral contract was removed from the statute of frauds by clear and convincing evidence under arkansas law the defendant could not terminate the contract at its will only a contract of indefinite duration may be so terminated D. holding that contract for purchase of real property terminated by its own terms upon buyers giving of a certain notice and that therefore the contract was no longer valid and enforceable E. holding that plaintiff could not have reasonably relied on an oral representation that the atwill provision of his employment contract did not apply to him when he entered into the contract that expressly contradicted the oral representations

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that section 72501 bars enforcement of an oral contract that was intended by a distributor and its customer to last longer than a year even though the contract could have been terminated for cause within a year
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as set forth in the SEC Reports or on Schedule 2.1(p) , none of the officers, directors or employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is presently a party to any transaction with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (other than for ordinary course services as employees, officers or directors), including any contract, agreement or other arrangement providing for the furnishing of services to or by, providing for rental of real or personal property to or from, or otherwise requiring payments to or from any such officer, director or employee or, to the best knowledge of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, any corporation, partnership, trust or other Person in which any such officer, director, or employee has a substantial interest or is an employee, officer, director, trustee or partner.

assistant: Transactions With Affiliates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties to each assignment shall execute and deliver to the Administrative Agent an Assignment and Assumption, together with a processing and recordation fee of $3,500 for each assignment; provided that (A) only one such fee will be payable in connection with simultaneous assignments to two or more related Approved Funds by a Lender and (B) the Administrative Agent may, in its sole discretion, elect to waive such processing and recordation fee in the case of any assignment. The assignee, if it is not a Lender, shall deliver to the Administrative Agent an Administrative Questionnaire.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Credit Parties shall provide to Administrative Agent promptly after the commencement thereof, notice of all actions, suits, and proceedings before any Governmental Authority, affecting any Restricted Entity that could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrowers may request, convert or continue Loans, select interest rates and transfer funds based on telephonic or e-mailed instructions to Administrative Agent. Borrowers shall confirm each such request by prompt delivery to Administrative Agent of a Notice of Borrowing or Notice of Conversion/Continuation, if applicable, but if it differs materially from the action taken by Administrative Agent or Lenders, the records of Administrative Agent and Lenders shall govern. Neither Administrative Agent nor any Lender shall have any liability for any loss suffered by a Borrower as a result of Administrative Agent or any Lender acting upon its understanding of telephonic or e-mailed instructions from a person believed in good faith by Administrative Agent or any Lender to be a person authorized to give such instructions on a Borrower’s behalf.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company understands and agrees that it will be solely responsible for all attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Fund with respect to the Litigation or otherwise pertaining to any and all matters related hereto. The Fund understands and acknowledges that the Settlement Shares. as converted by the Fund pursuant to this Agreement, the Purchase Agreement and the Note are hereby deemed to include, but not be limited to, the attorneys' fees and costs of the Fund with respect to the Litigation and any and all matters related thereto.

assistant: Costs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without giving effect to any conflict of law principles. For purposes of litigating any dispute that arises directly or indirectly from the relationship of the parties pursuant to this Agreement that is not subject to arbitration pursuant to Section 7.5 of this Agreement, the parties hereby submit to and consent to the jurisdiction of the State of California and agree that such litigation shall be conducted only in the courts of the County of San Diego, California, or the federal courts of the United States for the Southern District of California, and no other courts.

assistant: Venues
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: phrase “unable to stand trial” is that the defendant effectively waives the 180-day limitation “during the time it takes to resolve matters raised by him.” Taylor, 861 F.2d at 321 (citation omitted). The First Circuit, however, has noted that, under certain circumstances, “there is substantially less reason to view the filing of defense motions as open-ended waivers of the [180]-day deadline.” Id. at 322. Thus, the First Circuit “ha[s] held out the possibility... that where a defendant timely advises the court that he or she is claiming protections under the IAD and the court takes more time than is necessary to resolve the defendant’s pretrial motions, then the delay may not be fully excluded from the [180]-day clock.” United States . Smith, 686 S.W.2d 543, 548 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985) (<HOLDING>). Instead, it was the trial court’s sua sponte Options: A. holding that when determining whether a delay in prosecution violates a defendants right to a speedy trial courts must consider the length of the delay the reason for the delay whether the defendant asserted his rights and the resulting prejudice to the defendant B. holding that although the defendant filed a number of motions because the original trial date never changed as a result of those motions no delay could be attributed to the motions C. holding that the state did not meet its burden under the iad of establishing that the defendants motions and requests for discovery delayed the trial because 1 the record disclosed no reason why those motions could not have been disposed of within a short time after they were filed 2 there was no evidence the process of discovery did in fact delay the trial and 3 the record failed to suggest how those pleadings could have resulted in delay D. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion to extend discovery where no effort was made to explain why the requested discovery could not have taken place within the original discovery period E. holding that the defendants discovery requests were untimely because they were not served in time for the responses to be due before the discovery deadline

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the state did not meet its burden under the iad of establishing that the defendants motions and requests for discovery delayed the trial because 1 the record disclosed no reason why those motions could not have been disposed of within a short time after they were filed 2 there was no evidence the process of discovery did in fact delay the trial and 3 the record failed to suggest how those pleadings could have resulted in delay
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Cases, 390 U.S. 747, 88 S.Ct. 1344, 20 L.Ed.2d 312 (1968) (quoted in Legislative History of NGPA, supra note 36, at n. 52). 40 . See Legislative History of NGPA, supra note 36, at 110-11; [1972] F.P.C.Ann.Rep. 49. 41 . 15 U.S.C. § 3312 (establishing ceiling price for "new natural gas and certain natural gas produced from the [OCS]," and granting favorable pricing treatment to gas produced as a result of new exploration). 42 . 15 U.S.C. § 3313 (giving incentives to new developmental drilling). 43 . 15 U.S.C. § 3317 (providing special pricing for "high-cost natural gas”). 44 . 15 U.S.C. § 3318 (setting incentive price for "stripper wells”). 45 . 15 U.S.C. § 3320; see supra note 10, and accompanying text. 46 . See supra notes 10-15, 40. 47 . See e.g., The Texas Company, 64 I.D. 76 (1957) (<HOLDING>). 48 . See California Co. v. Udall, 296 F.2d Options: A. recognizing special circumstances exception B. holding that courts have inherent authority in special circumstances to stay adjudication C. holding that a special relationship may arise from the factual circumstances of a particular case D. holding that special handling charges recouped from pipeline purchasers under extraordinary circumstances were royaltybearing E. holding that rough handling under the exigent circumstances present was not excessive force

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that special handling charges recouped from pipeline purchasers under extraordinary circumstances were royaltybearing
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: as failing to satisfy [the anti-cutback rule of IRC § 411(d)(6) ] as a result of the amendments ehminating the retirees benefit increases, because the amendments were adopted before the effective date of the final regulations. Id. (emphasis added). We can logically deduce from this declaration that the IRS did not consider the post-retirement COLA an “accrued benefit” under the 2002 Regulation, which was unquestionably applicable prior to August 12, 2005. This position is diametrically opposed to Treasury’s proffered interpretation in Sheet Metal Workers’. Because Treasury has abandoned the litigation position it took in that case, the Court is relieved of any obligation to defer to it under Auer. Cf. Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 186-87, 111 S.Ct. 1759, 114 L.Ed.2d 233 (1991) (<HOLDING>). S. Pattern Regulation — 26 C.F.R. § Ull(d)-h Options: A. holding that chevron deference is due only to a reasonable interpretation made by the administrator of an agency B. holding that chevron deference is due only when the agency acts pursuant to delegated authority and the agency action has the force of law C. holding regulations entitled to chevron deference D. holding that agency interpretation which is reasonable is entitled to deference E. holding that a longstanding agency interpretation was no longer entitled to chevron deference given that the agency had changed its position on the issue

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a longstanding agency interpretation was no longer entitled to chevron deference given that the agency had changed its position on the issue
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Conduct its businesses in compliance with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the UK Bribery Act 2010, and other similar anti-corruption legislation in other jurisdictions, and maintain policies and procedures designed to promote and achieve compliance with such laws.

assistant: Anti-Corruption Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and any Warrant Certificate may be amended by the parties hereto by executing a supplemental warrant agreement, without the consent of any of the Holders, for the purpose of (i) curing any ambiguity, or curing, correcting or supplementing any defective provision contained herein, or making any other provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under this Agreement that is not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement or the Warrants, (ii) evidencing the succession of another corporation to the Company and the assumption by any such successor of the covenants of the Company contained in this Agreement and the Warrants, (iii) evidencing and providing for the acceptance of appointment by a successor Warrant Agent with respect to the Warrants, (iv) adding to the covenants of the Company for the benefit of the Holders or surrendering any right or power conferred upon the Company under this Agreement, or (viii) amending this Agreement and the Warrants in any manner that the Company may deem to be necessary or desirable and that will not adversely affect the interests of the Holders in any material respect. All other modifications or amendments to this Agreement, including any amendment to increase the Exercise Price or shorten the Exercise Period, shall require the written consent of the Holders of a majority of the then outstanding Warrants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may extend the duration of the Exercise Period in accordance with Section 3.2 without such consent.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 471 U.S. 82 105 S.Ct. 1859 85 L.Ed.2d 62 Roger L. SPENCER, et ux., petitioners,v.SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION et al No. 84-249 Supreme Court of the United States March 27, 1985 Rehearing Denied May 13, 1985. See 471 U.S. 1112, 105 S.Ct. 2349. On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina. PER CURIAM. 1 The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. 2 Justice POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

assistant: 6
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This letter agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of New York or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of Laws of any jurisdiction other than those of the State of New York.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the implementation of federal bankruptcy law. We and other circuits have held that the RFRA applies retroactively in other contexts. E.g., Hamilton v. Schriro, 74 F.3d 1545, 1549 (8th Cir.1996); Holterman v. Helling, 70 F.3d 1276 (8th Cir.1995) (table); Brown-El v. Harris, 26 F.3d 68, 69 (8th Cir.1994); see also Flores v. City of Boerne, 73 F.3d 1352, 1355 (5th Cir.1996) (city historic preservation ordinance); Droz v. Commissioner, 48 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir.1995) (Social Security taxes), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 698, 133 L.Ed.2d 656 (1996). Bankruptcy courts in other jurisdictions have applied the RFRA retroactively. See, e.g., In re Tessier, 190 B.R. 396, 403 (Bankr.D.Mont.1995) (applying RFRA to protect tithing, but holding RFRA is unconstitutional); In re Newman, 183 B.R. at 251 (<HOLDING>). RFRA On the merits the church argues that Options: A. holding first amendment does not protect nonexpressive conduct B. recognizing drug traffickers will commonly possess firearms to protect their product to protect their drugs to protect their cash to protect their life and even to protect their turf alteration in original internal quotation marks omit ted C. holding that hate crimes prevention act does not violate rfra D. holding that the freedom of access to clinic entrances law does not violate rfra because face addresses governmental interests in preventing violence E. holding rfra does not protect tithing

assistant: The best answer is E. holding rfra does not protect tithing
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: further , you agree that all terminations , limitations of access and suspensions for cause shall be made in yahoo 's sole discretion and that yahoo shall not be liable to you or any third party for any termination of your account , any associated email address , or access to the yahoo services .

assistant: Limitation of liability, Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: yahoo grants you a personal , non-transferable and non-exclusive right and license to use the object code of its software on a single computer ; provided that you do not ( and do not allow any third party to ) copy , modify , create a derivative work from , reverse engineer , reverse assemble or otherwise attempt to discover any source code , sell , assign , sublicense , grant a security interest in or otherwise transfer any right in the software .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the Employment Period, the Executive shall serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer. In such position, the Executive’s responsibilities shall include leading corporate strategy, business development, and corporate communications/investor relations. The Executive shall be based at the Company’s headquarters in New Haven, Connecticut, or such place or places in the continental United States as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) shall determine. The Executive shall be subject to the supervision of, and shall have such authority as is delegated to the Executive by, the CEO or the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). The Executive hereby accepts such employment and agrees to undertake the duties and responsibilities inherent in such position and such other duties and responsibilities as the CEO or the Board shall from time to time reasonably assign to the Executive. The Executive agrees to devote his entire business time, attention and energies to the business and interests of the Company during the Employment Period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Executive may serve on a board of directors of a public or private company following the prior written approval of the CEO and the Board of Directors, provided that any such board service does not, in the judgment of the CEO and/or the Board, interfere in any material respect with the performance of the Executive’s duties for the Company, create a conflict of interest, or otherwise violate this Agreement or any other written agreement between the Company and the Executive, including the Restrictive Covenant Agreement (as defined below). The Executive agrees to abide by the rules, regulations, instructions, personnel practices and policies of the Company and any changes therein which may be adopted from time to time by the Company. The Executive will be eligible to participate in the Company’s performance review process.

assistant: Titles
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to better their working conditions,’ we do not think that Congress could have intended the protection of § 7 to be as narrow as [to exclude protection outside the employer-employee context]. Id. at 566-67, 98 S.Ct. 2505 (quoting NLRB v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9, 14, 82 S.Ct. 1099, 8 L.Ed.2d 298 (1962)). Our circuit has explicitly held that “[e]mployees have the right to engage in concerted communications with third parties regarding legitimate employee concerns, such as terms and conditions of employment and grievances.” Compuware Corp. v. NLRB, 134 F.3d 1285, 1291 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1123, 118 S.Ct. 1805, 140 L.Ed.2d 945 (1998). Third parties can include the employer’s clients or customers. Ibid.; see also Handicabs, Inc. v. NLRB, 95 F.3d 681 (8th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). B. Loss of protection due to actual malice Options: A. holding that where the employment of the injured employees was the occasion of the injury the injuries arose out of employment B. holding that a school board policy prohibiting employees from sending their children to private schools interfered with employees constitutional right to control the education of their children C. holding that a company policy violated the act by prohibiting employees from discussing employment conditions with the companys clients D. holding that a company exercising substantial control of the terms and conditions of the work of the employees is an employer under the flsa E. holding employees identified no clear public policy which their termination violated

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a company policy violated the act by prohibiting employees from discussing employment conditions with the companys clients
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Closing shall take place on the date of this Agreement, or such other time, place and date as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto. The Closing shall be held at the offices of Buyer’s counsel or such other place as shall be mutually agreed upon by Buyer and the Sellers. The date of the Closing is sometimes herein referred to as the “Closing Date”. By mutual agreement of the parties, the Closing may be alternatively accomplished by facsimile transmission to the respective offices of legal counsel for the parties of the requisite documents, duly executed where required, with originals to be delivered by overnight courier service on the next business day following the Closing.

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Receiving Party shall not, without the prior written approval of Disclosing Party, use for Receiving Party's benefit, publish, copy, or otherwise disclose to others, or permit the use by others for their benefit or to the detriment of Disclosing Party, any Confidential Information.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: we use the services of third parties to process your payments and we require that these third parties take the appropriate organizational and technical measures to protect your personal data and traffic data and to comply with relevant laws .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Subsection (d) provides that a complaint regarding the legal or factual sufficiency of the evidence in a nonjury case may be made for the first time on appeal. Tex.R.App. P. 33.1(d) (emphasis added). The State contends that, by implication, the amendment recognizes the general rule — that complaints must be preserved to ensure appellate review — applies to all cases tried before a jury. We disagree. In criminal cases, an appellate court must always review challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence. Rankin v. State, 46 S.W.3d 899, 901 (Tex.Crim.App.2001). “A claim regarding sufficiency of the evidence need not be preserved for review at the trial level and is not waived by the failure to do so.” Id.; see also Grayson v. State, 82 S.W.3d 357, 358-59 (Tex.App.-Austin 2001, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Davila v. State, 930 S.W.2d 641, 648 Options: A. holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review B. holding that a factual sufficiency complaint in a parental termination case may be reviewed even though it was not preserved in the trial court C. holding that factual sufficiency claim need not be preserved pursuant to texas rule of appellate procedure 331 D. recognizing this texas rule E. holding that a sufficiency challenge must be preserved in the trial court in a parental termination case to be reviewed on appeal

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that factual sufficiency claim need not be preserved pursuant to texas rule of appellate procedure 331
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for Landlord’s reasonable costs and expenses incurred in conjunction with the processing and documentation of any assignment or subletting, including reasonable attorneys’, architects’, engineers’ or other consultants’ fees whether or not such sublease or assignment agreement is actually consummated.

assistant: Costs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower agrees to pay or reimburse the Lenders for all reasonable fees and out-of-pocket disbursements incurred by the Lenders in connection with the preparation, execution, delivery, administration and enforcement of this Amendment, including without limitation the reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel for the Lenders, to the same extent that the Borrower would be required to do so pursuant to Section 10.4 of the Credit Agreement.

assistant: Expenses