flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice which either party hereto may be required or permitted to give to the other shall be in writing, and any be delivered personally or by mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: to the Company, at 121 South Orange Ave., Suite 1500, Orlando, FL 32801, Attention: Chief Executive Officer, or at such other address as the Company, by notice, may designate in writing from time to time; to the Option Holder, at the address shown on the records of the Company or at such other address as the Option Holder, by notice to the Company, may designate in writing from time to time.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: LIBERTY, 408 F.3d 1250, 1254 (9th Cir.2005) (“Kukje II”). This rule is generally accepted by courts in this and other circuits. See All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V HANJIN YOSU, 7 F.3d 1427, 1432 (9th Cir.1993) (“At the very least, Plaintiffs initiation of this suit constituted acceptance of the terms of the Hanjin bills of lading.”) cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1194, 114 S.Ct. 1301, 127 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994); Mitsui & Co. (USA), Inc. v. MIRA M/V, 111 F.3d 33, 36 (5th Cir.1997) (“the district court did not err in determining that, by filing a lawsuit for damages under the bill of lading, [the shipper] has accepted the terms of the bill of lading, including the unnegotiated forum selection clause”); F.D. Import & Export Corp. v. M/V REEFER SUN, 248 F.Supp.2d 240, 248 (S.D.N.Y.2002) (<HOLDING>); Farrell Lines Inc. v. Columbus Cello-Poly Options: A. holding that bill of lading not charterparty governed contract dispute between carrier and shipper B. holding that forum selection clause in a bill of lading issued to an nvocc binds the cargo owner because the nvocc acted as the cargo owners agent in accepting the bill of lading C. holding that terms of bill of lading apply to shipper where it brings suit thereunder D. holding that bill of lading issued as to two containers was binding as to third container which was stolen and as to which no bill of lading issued provided that the bill of lading in evidence was the standard form bill of lading that carrier always used E. holding that carrier may be estopped from collecting freight charges from shipper who paid freight to consolidator in reliance on carriers representation that such payment would discharge shippers bill of lading obligation

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that terms of bill of lading apply to shipper where it brings suit thereunder
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: such regulations may not infringe on an individual’s fundamental constitutional rights. Defendants counter that it is the State’s right to define marriage free from federal interference. They assert that the issues before this Court are “inherently political questions” and not “constitutional issues.” Oral Arg. Tr. p. 32. While Texas has the “unquestioned authority” to regulate and define marriage, see Windsor, 133 S.Ct. at 2693, the State must nevertheless do so in a way that does not infringe on an individual’s constitutional rights. See id. at 2692 (noting that the incidents, benefits, and obligations of marriage may vary from state to state but are still subject to constitutional guarantees); see Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 620, 104 S.Ct. 3244, 82 L.Ed.2d 462 (1984) (<HOLDING>); see also Carey v. Population Servs. Int'l, Options: A. holding that our federal constitution undoubtedly imposes constraints on the states power to control the selection of ones spouse B. holding that our courts are bound by the united states supreme courts interpretation of the federal constitution C. recognizing that state constitution imposes more stringent limitations on power of state to inquire into lawful associations and speech than those imposed by federal constitution D. holding a defendant is liable as a control person if the defendant had the power to control the general affairs of the entity primarily liable at the time the entity violated the securities laws but declining to decide whether power to control means simply abstract power to control or actual exercise of the power to control internal quotations omitted E. holding that individual states may construe their own constitutions as imposing more stringent constraints on police conduct than does the federal constitution

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that our federal constitution undoubtedly imposes constraints on the states power to control the selection of ones spouse
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: care services), Senior Living Services, Inc. (providing senior citizen care and services), the Center For Personal and Family Growth (offering psychological and support services), Bayside Pharmacy Services, Inc. (operating a pharmacy), Independent Professional Services, Inc. (owner of a medical diagnostic service and magnetic resonance imaging facility), Joint Patient Services, Inc. (offering oncology and cancer treatment), Community Rehabilitation Specialists (providing rehabilitative health services), Great Lakes Home Health (providing health care services and selling durable medical equipment), Cardiac Fitness (engaged in health care for patients with health disorders), College Park Properties (owner of certain real estate in Edinboro, Pennsylvania), and Great Lakes Manage Care (<HOLDING>). The trial court also found that HHSI oversees Options: A. recognizing validity of retroactive license that memorialized grant of oral license B. holding governments repudiation of license gave patentee right to terminate license C. holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer D. holding motorist entitled to hearing before taking his license under statute that required loss of license if uninsured driver involved in an accident E. holding a license to operate a health maintenance facility

assistant: The best answer is E. holding a license to operate a health maintenance facility
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you reside in india , prior to august 1 , 2017 , the entity you are contracting with is ebay india private limited , 14th floor , north block , r-tech park , western express highway , goregaon ( east ) , mumbai 400063 , maharashtra ; thereafter , the entity is ebay international ag , helvetiastrasse 15/17 , 3005 , bern , switzerland .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Signature pages may be detached from multiple separate counterparts and attached to a single counterpart. Delivery of an executed signature page of this Agreement by facsimile transmission or Electronic Transmission shall be as effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: fitbit may enable you to post , upload , store , share , send , or display photos , images , video , data , text , music , exercise regimens , food logs , recipes , comments , and other information and content ( `` your content '' ) to and via the fitbit service .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: to the extent any component of the software may be offered under an open source license , we 'll make that license available to you and the provisions of that license may expressly override some of these terms .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement (including the schedules hereto and the documents and instruments referred to in this Agreement) constitutes the entire agreement among the parties and supersedes the Commitment Letter and all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and transactions contemplated hereby.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: NantHealth may authorize its Subsidiaries to exercise the rights granted to NantHealth under Section 2.1 , provided that such Subsidiaries agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement to the same extent that they apply to NantHealth. NantHealth shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of such Subsidiaries which, for purposes of this Agreement, shall be deemed to be the acts and omissions of NantHealth.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all such counterparts will together constitute the same agreement. Executed signature pages to this Agreement may be delivered by facsimile, email or other electronic means and will be deemed as sufficient as if original signature pages had been delivered.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties hereto, and shall supersede any other agreements and understandings (written or oral) between Seller and Purchaser on or prior to the date of this Agreement with respect to the transaction contemplated in this Agreement.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: City of Thornton, 817 P.2d 514, 518 (Colo.1991) (in providing that a "dangerous condition shall not exist solely because the design of any facility is inadequate," § 24-10-108(1), the General Assembly did not intend to distinguish between designs that are "inadequate" initially and designs that become "inadequate" over a period of time); Lyons v. City of Aurora, 987 P.2d 900, 902 (Colo.App.1999) (by amending definition of dangerous condition in 1992 to provide that "maintenance does not include any duty to upgrade, modernize, modify, or improve the design or construction of a facility" General Assembly intended "to preclude liability when a governmental entity fails to modify a facility because of changing safety standards or use") (citing Swieckowski); see also Karr, 677 P.2d at 1386 (<HOLDING>); Jaffe v. City & County of Denver, 15 P.3d Options: A. holding that if property is not property1 of the public entity then the public entity cannot be subject to suit under the dangerous condition waiver B. holding that land dedicated for a public street may not be leased to a private entity for private use C. holding that the public entity was not required to modify or improve intersection based on changing use D. holding that the crucial distinction that rendered the public entity liable for a private actors inaccessibility was that the public entity had contracted with the private actor for it to provide aid benefits or services to beneficiaries of the public entitys redevelopment program E. holding that the use of a corset spring device was public although the use was by its nature not visible to the general public

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the public entity was not required to modify or improve intersection based on changing use
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the other Transaction Documents to which such Buyer is a party have been duly and validly authorized, executed and delivered on behalf of such Buyer and shall constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of such Buyer enforceable against such Buyer in accordance with their respective terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by general principles of equity or to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, liquidation and other similar laws relating to, or affecting generally, the enforcement of applicable creditors' rights and remedies.

assistant: Enforcements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: account of the legislative history, the BAP rightly concluded that on the facts of this case a proof of claim need not necessarily be filed to trigger the waiver of sovereign immunity set forth in section 106(a). This result effectuates Congress’s desire to prohibit the government from participating in the distribution of the bankruptcy estate without relinquishing part of its sovereign immunity. See supra, H.R.Rep. No. 595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 317, U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 6274, (“The governmental unit cannot receive distribution from the estate without subjecting itself to any liability it has to the estate within the confines of a compulsory counterclaim rule. Any other result would be one-sided.”); see also In re OPM Leasing Servs., 21 B.R. 993, 1001-02 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1982) (<HOLDING>); In re Davis, 20 B.R. 519, 520-23 Options: A. holding that a debtors adversary proceeding against the university of virginia to determine the dischargeability of a debt is a suit for eleventh amendment purposes B. holding that sovereign immunity barred a wrongful death claim against the board and stating that the only question is whether the boards sovereign immunity protection was waived emphasis added C. holding that a notice of appeal filed in an adversary proceeding could not appeal the main proceeding D. holding that a claim that sovereign immunity has been waived is itself waived if not argued on appeal E. holding that west virginia waived sovereign immunity by initiating adversary proceeding even though it had not filed a proof of claim

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that west virginia waived sovereign immunity by initiating adversary proceeding even though it had not filed a proof of claim
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: continues to run until the end of the next business day); (see also ECF No. 553, Decl. of Publication.). As stated previously, courts typically require “strict compliance” with the rules and deadlines governing forfeiture proceedings. Amiel, 995 F.2d at 371 (collecting cases applying standard). However, in the context of a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), the Second Circuit has advised that “[a] pro se complaint should not be dismissed unless ‘it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiffs can prove no set of facts in support of [their] claims which would entitle [them] to relief.’ ” Weixel v. Bd. of Educ. of N.Y., 287 F.3d 138, 145 (2d Cir.2002) (quoting Conley eneral creditor lacked standing to petition to modify an order of forfeiture); Coluccio, 51 F.3d at 339 (<HOLDING>); Schwimmer, 968 F.2d at 1581; see also Options: A. holding that a contest to a claim of exemption was ineffective when that contest was not by affidavit and did not properly state that the claim of exemption was invalid or excessive B. holding that general creditors do not have standing to contest forfeitures C. holding that 20 of creditors knowing of consignment relationship does not satisfy general knowledge requirement notwithstanding that such creditors represented 63 of claims against debtor D. holding that employers have standing to sue E. holding that representatives of the news media have the standing to contest a court order restricting public access to legal proceedings

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that general creditors do not have standing to contest forfeitures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The validity, construction and effect of this Agreement, and of any determinations or decisions made by the Administrator relating to this Agreement, and the rights of any and all persons having or claiming to have any interest under this Agreement, shall be determined exclusively in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its provisions concerning the applicability of laws of other jurisdictions.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The target Award shall be adjusted by the Committee after the end of the Performance Period, based on the level of achievement of the Performance Goal established with respect to the Performance Period as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. The date that the Committee determines the level of Performance Goal achievement applicable to the Award is the “ Determination Date ” .

assistant: Adjustments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, in addition to the Revolving Loans provided for in Section 2.01(b), the Borrower may request an Issuing Bank to issue, at any time and from time to time during the Availability Period, Letters of Credit for its own account in such form as is acceptable to the Administrative Agent and the applicable Issuing Bank in its reasonable determination. Letters of Credit issued hereunder shall constitute utilization of the Revolving Commitments.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Every provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any term or provision hereof is illegal, invalid or unenforceable for any reason whatsoever, that term or provision will be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to effect the intent of the parties, and such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or legality of the remainder of this Agreement. If necessary to effect the intent of the parties, the Members will negotiate in good faith to amend this Agreement to replace the unenforceable language with enforceable language which as closely as possible reflects such intent.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in the district courts, which have concluded uniformly that a fíne does not stem from a consensual transaction and thus is not a debt under the FDCPA. See Reid v. Am. Traffic Solutions, Inc., Nos. 10-ev-204-JPG-DGW & 10-cv-269-JPG, 2010 WL 5289108, at *4-5 (S.D.Ill. Dec. 20, 2010) (concluding that fines for traffic violations are not debts under FDCPA); Mills v. City of Springfield, Mo., No. 2:10-CV-04036-NKL, 2010 WL 3526208, at *15-16 (W.D.Mo. Sept. 3, 2010) (same); Durso v. Summer Brook Preserve Homeowners Ass’n, 641 F.Supp.2d 1256, 1264-65 (M.D.Fla.2008) (concluding that fines assessed against homeowner by homeowners association did not create debts under FDCPA); Shannon v. ACS State & Local Solutions, Inc., No. 08-594(DSD/SRN), 2008 WL 2277814, at *1 (D.Minn. May 30, 2008) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. Redflex Traffic Sys., Inc., No. Options: A. holding that even though statute did not provide for attorneys fees against county its failure to object constituted waiver B. holding that a mere parking violation justified the investigatory stop of choudrys vehicle C. holding that a conviction under the registration clause is not properly distinguishable from a conviction for failure to register for purposes of fifth amendment analysis D. holding that fines levied by county for parking violation and failure to register vehicle did not meet criteria for fdcpa debts E. holding automobile exeeption did not apply to warrantless search of vehicle where vehicle was not readily mobile because the vehicle was legally parked in parking lot occupants of vehicle were seated on a bench in the playground near the parking lot police officers surrounded the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle was handcuffed for safety purposes

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that fines levied by county for parking violation and failure to register vehicle did not meet criteria for fdcpa debts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Note to App.R. 26; see App.R. 26(B)(7). 33 . App.R. 26(B)(8). 34 . App.R. 26(B)(7). 35 . Davis at ¶ 26. 36 . See App.R. 26(B)(5). 37 . See App.R. 26(B)(9). 38 . See Davis at ¶ 26. 39 . App.R. 26(B)(9). 40 . See 1993 Staff Note to App.R. 26. 41 . State v. Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21, 2004-Ohio-6085, 817 N.E.2d 864. 42 . State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961. 43 . Colegrove v. Burns, (1964), 175 Ohio St. 437, 25 O.O.2d 447, 195 N.E.2d 811. 44 . Romito v. Maxwell (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 266, 39 O.O.2d 414, 227 N.E.2d 223; see State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568, ¶ 20. 45 . (Emphasis added.) Colegrove, 175 Ohio St. at 438, 25 O.O.2d 447, 195 N.E.2d 811. 46 . State v. Beasley (1984), 14 Ohio St.3d 74, 75, 14 OBR 511, 471 N.E.2d 774 (<HOLDING>). 47 . Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21, Options: A. holding that the trial courts correction of a statutorily incorrect sentence did not violate defendants doublejeopardy rights B. holding that placing the burden of proof on a taxpayer to demonstrate a tax deficiency assessment was incorrect did not violate due process C. holding that correction of trial courts miscalculation giving credit to defendant for time not actually served did not violate double jeopardy because defendant had no legitimate expectation of finality D. holding that the auuw statute did not violate the defendants second amendment rights E. holding that correction of sentence to conform with plea agreement did not violate double jeopardy because the defendant had no legitimate expectation of finality

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the trial courts correction of a statutorily incorrect sentence did not violate defendants doublejeopardy rights
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “the prima facie case is not an inflexible doctrine. In certain cases involving discrimination falling outside the more traditional categories of hiring and firing, it may be modified.”). The court finds that plaintiff has met this burden. Plaintiff has made the first showing of his prima facie case by establishing that he is a member of a protected class by way of race and national origin. He was born in Iran, is of Assyrian descent, has dark skin, and speaks with a slight foreign accent. Defendants’ contention that “plaintiff cannot show that he was considered a protected class member” is completely without merit. See Amro, 232 F.3d at 798 (finding-persons of Lebanese ancestry are members of protected class); Daemi v. Church’s Fried Chicken, Inc., 931 F.2d 1379, 1387 (10th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>); Mohammed v. Callaway, 698 F.2d 395, 398 (10th Options: A. holding that no class member may opt out of a rule 23b1 class action B. recognizing that plaintiff who is not actually disabled may still be a member of third protected class C. holding that plaintiff who was iranian is a member of a protected class D. holding that a class plaintiff who seeks to assert statutory rights to protect a class of which he is a member is not asserting rights antagonistic to any members of that class E. recognizing cause of action by class member against class counsel for negligence in providing notice

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that plaintiff who was iranian is a member of a protected class
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: for cause based on bias. Moreover, there is no statute or rule requiring a victim to be presented to the venire. Here, the victim and his wife were not available to be presented to the venire to determine if any member of the panel may have known the victim or his wife. Similarly, if the victim or a witness was unavailable because of injury or death, he or she clearly would not be present. However, the prosecutor offered to present the names of the victim and his wife to the venire to determine bias. Despite some discussion after the trial court’s dismissal as to whether the victim had wanted Watts to be imprisoned, the prosecutor clearly stated that the victim and witness would be available and willing to testify at trial. Cf. Ready v. State, 574 So.2d 894, 902 (Ala.Crim.App.1990) (<HOLDING>). After asserting that the victim and witness Options: A. holding that the improper admission of hearsay testimony from two witnesses whose testimony was brief and consistent with the victims testimony did not constitute drumbeat repetition of the victims statements B. holding admission of preliminary hearing testimony did not violate the sixth amendment where defendants motive during crossexamination was the same as at trial C. holding that the victims prior videotaped testimony from a preliminary hearing was admissible as testimony at trial where the victim was unavailable to testify D. holding that evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct with the victim is admissible to corroborate the victims testimony E. holding that a videotaped interview between the child and an investigator was admissible

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the victims prior videotaped testimony from a preliminary hearing was admissible as testimony at trial where the victim was unavailable to testify
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Cash Collateral (or the appropriate portion thereof) provided to reduce Fronting Exposure or other obligations shall be released promptly following (i) the elimination of the applicable Fronting Exposure or other obligations giving rise thereto (including by the termination of Defaulting Lender status of the applicable Lender (or, as appropriate, its assignee)), or (ii) the Administrative Agent’s good faith determination that there exists excess Cash Collateral (which determination shall be confirmed by any Issuing Lender or Swingline Lender affected by such release of Cash Collateral); provided , however, that, subject to Section 2.21, the Person providing Cash Collateral and each applicable Issuing Lender or Swingline Lender may agree that Cash Collateral shall not be released but instead held to support future anticipated Fronting Exposure or other obligations.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As compensation for the Executive’s services, the Executive shall receive a base salary (the “Base Salary”) at an annual rate of not less than $1,000,000, which shall be reviewed annually, to be paid in the same manner as other senior executives of the Company are paid (which shall be no less frequently than monthly).

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (ii) to any obligation of the insured to indemnify or contribute with another because of damages arising out of the bodily injury[.] Id. at 378 (emphasis added). I. Neither the bodily injury provision nor the amendatory endorsement is ambiguous. To determine whether the damages that East Central paid to the Creek County Well Service employees arose out of a bodily injury as defined by the CGL Policy, and if so, whether East Central’s claim against Creek County Well Service is one for indemnification or contribution for such damages and therefore is excluded from coverage, we must fi erage for indemnification claims against the insured arising out of bodily injuries excludes coverage for East Central’s claim against Creek County Well Service. Cf. Pearson Servs., Inc., 937 F.2d at 403-04 (<HOLDING>). If we were instead to accept East Central’s Options: A. holding that the policys exclusion of coverage for any obligation of the insured to indemnify another because of damages arising out of such bodily injury operates where the genesis of the action is an employees workrelated bodily injury quoting national union fire ins co 906 f2d at 200 B. holding that where policies exclude coverage for injuries that are intended or expected the exclusion is applicable if the insured acts with the intent or expectation that bodily injury will result even though the bodily injury that does result is different either in character or magnitude from the injury that was intended C. holding that the fatal injury to a murder victim may be considered as satisfying the bodily injury component of the capital felony of kidnapping with bodily injury D. holding as unambiguous under iowa law the insurance policys exclusion of coverage to any obligation of the insured to indemnify another because of damages arising out of a bodily injury to any employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of his employment by the insured E. holding a limitation on damages arising out of bodily injury to one person involved in an accident applies to all claims arising from the death of that person

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the policys exclusion of coverage for any obligation of the insured to indemnify another because of damages arising out of such bodily injury operates where the genesis of the action is an employees workrelated bodily injury quoting national union fire ins co 906 f2d at 200
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All representations and warranties of such Credit Party contained in this Agreement and the Other Documents to which it is a party shall be true and correct in all material respects (except that such materiality qualifier shall not be applicable to any representations and warranties that already are qualified or modified by materiality in the text thereof) at the time of such Credit Party's execution of this Agreement and the Other Documents to which it is a party and true and correct in all in all material respects (except that such materiality qualifier shall not be applicable to any representations and warranties that already are qualified or modified by materiality in the text thereof) as of the time of any request for an Advance (except to the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date, in which case they shall be true and correct in all material respects (except that such materiality qualifier shall not be applicable to any representations and warranties that already are qualified or modified by materiality in the text thereof) as of such earlier date).

assistant: Warranties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Unless expressly set forth in a document signed by both parties, the restrictive covenants set forth herein shall survive the termination of this Agreement and the termination of Executive ’s employment for any reason, voluntary or involuntary. Executive ’s obligations hereunder are independent of Executive ’s employment. Any breach or alleged breach by the Company of any obligation to Executive shall not affect the binding nature of Executive ’s obligations under this Agreement or excuse or terminate Executive ’s obligations hereunder.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered as follows with notice deemed given as indicated: (i) by personal delivery when delivered personally; (ii) by overnight courier upon written verification of receipt; (iii) by telecopy or facsimile transmission upon acknowledgment of receipt of electronic transmission; or (iv) by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, upon verification of receipt.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Haire, 719 F.3d at 362, B. Giles argues that Defendants -discriminated against her due to her gender in violation of Title VII and the equal protection clause. She cites both Defendants’ nonrenewal of her employment and the decision to not approve a pay increase. Giles has not presented any direct evidence of discrimination; therefore, under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, she must first establish a pri-ma facie case of gender discrimination. Bryan v. McKinsey & Co., 375 F.3d 358, 360 (5th Cir. 2004) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)); Lee v. Conecuh Cty. Bd. of Educ., 634 F.2d 959, 962 (5th Cir. 1981) (<HOLDING>). To establish a prima facie case, Giles must Options: A. holding that lprs are entitled to the protection of the equal protection clause B. holding that we lack jurisdiction over unexhausted equal protection claims C. holding that doctrine does not violate equal protection D. recognizing the application of mcdonnel douglas to equal protection claims E. holding that the state law violated equal protection principles

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing the application of mcdonnel douglas to equal protection claims
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto and thereto shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the law of the State of New York, without reference to principles of conflicts of laws other than Sections 5-1401 and 5-1402 of the New York General Obligations Law if such provisions would lead to the application of law other than the State of New York.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Grantee agrees to satisfy all applicable foreign, federal, state and local income and employment tax withholding obligations and herewith delivers to the Company the full amount of such obligations or has made arrangements acceptable to the Company to satisfy such obligations. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the Grantee also agrees, as partial consideration for the designation of the Option as an Incentive Stock Option, to notify the Company in writing within thirty (30) days of any disposition of any shares acquired by exercise of the Option if such disposition occurs within two (2) years from the Date of Award or within one (1) year from the date the Shares were transferred to the Grantee.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: TENANT AND SUBTENANT HEREBY IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT AND CONSENT TO THE NONEXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION AND VENUE OF ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OVER LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO OR NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DELAWARE OR ANY COUNTY IN WHICH A FACILITY IS LOCATED, FOR ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE OR DEFEND ANY MATTER ARISING FROM OR RELATED TO [I] THIS LEASE; OR [II] ANY DOCUMENT EXECUTED BY TENANT OR SUBTENANT IN CONNECTION WITH THIS LEASE. TENANT AND SUBTENANT HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT TENANT AND SUBTENANT MAY EFFECTIVELY DO SO, THE DEFENSE OF AN INCONVENIENT FORUM TO THE MAINTENANCE OF ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING. TENANT AND SUBTENANT AGREE THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW.

assistant: Consent To Jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: v. Walkley, 143 A.D.2d 415, 416, 532 N.Y.S.2d 426, 427 (N.Y.App.Div.1988) 11 . 280 A.D.2d 892, 721 N.Y.S.2d 184 (N.Y.App.Div.2001) 12 . Id. 13 . Oaktree's Ex. A, § 7.1(e) and (£). 14 . Oaktree Ex. # A, § 7.1 atpg. 63. 15 . Id. 16 . 268 F.3d 743, 749 (9th Cir.2001) (citing What is Essential to Exercise of Option to Accelerate Maturity of Bill or Note, 5 A.L.R.2d 968, 971, 1949 WL 6858 (1949) [for the premise that the addition of words such as "without demand or notice” does not alter the requirement of an affirmative act of the holder of the note for the valid exercise of the option]). 17 . 452 F.Supp. 542, 547 (D.Vt.1978). 18 . 9 B.R. 99 (Bankr.D.Hawai‘i.1981). 19 Hotel Owner Limited Partnership (In re Schaumburg Hotel Owner Limited Partnership), 97 B.R. 943, 951 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1989) (<HOLDING>); In re Skyler Ridge, 80 B.R. 500, 509-511 Options: A. holding that nonresident rates are matter of contract that will not be reviewed for reasonableness B. holding that a court should allow the contractuallybargained for default rate under section 506b without examining the reasonableness of these rates provided they fall within the range of acceptable rates C. holding that the district court should have looked to prevailing rates in the area D. holding that under the filed rate doctrine a question regarding reasonable rates should be addressed to the department of insurance and that the rate plaintiff was charged is conclusively presumed reasonable under the filed rate doctrine E. holding that absent other evidence of prevailing market rates the district judge may establish a reasonable rate based on his familiarity with the prevailing rates in the area

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a court should allow the contractuallybargained for default rate under section 506b without examining the reasonableness of these rates provided they fall within the range of acceptable rates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Transition Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between you and Willis with regard to the subject matter hereof and supersedes Sections 1, 2 and 3 of your Employment Agreement, and all other provisions of your Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect.

assistant: Miscellaneous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party's obligations under this Section 2.13 shall survive the resignation or replacement of the Administrative Agent or any assignment of rights by, or the replacement of, a Lender, the termination of the Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all obligations under any Loan Document.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: could not qualify under the doctrine. Here, however, the Doe Companies, the prime opponents of the decree and the most vigorous accusers of Microsoft, appeared anonymously. That is quite a departure from normal procedure, and raises profound questions of fundamental fairness and perhaps even due process. It might well be that a party forced to confront an anonymous plaintiff (or the functional equivalent of a plaintiff acting as an amici) could suffer injury that might not be redress-able in an ultimate appeal. Anonymity may well confer a kind of immunity which permits a plaintiff to hurl rhetorical weapons that could cause a unique kind of harm not faced in ordinary litigation. Cf. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, — U.S. -, -, 115 S.Ct. 1511, 1524, 131 L.Ed.2d 426 (1995) (<HOLDING>). However, in our view, it is unnecessary to Options: A. recognizing first amendment retaliation right B. holding that state official english law violated the first amendment and the fourteenth amendments guarantee of equal protection under a strict scrutiny analysis because it impinges upon both the fundamental right to participate equally in the political process and the right to petition the government for redress C. holding that it violated the first amendment to prohibit announcement of views on disputed legal and political issues by candidates for judicial election D. holding that ohio election law forbidding all anonymous political leafletting violated the first amendment but noting that the right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct E. holding that primary election ballot filing fee violated fourteenth amendment and noting that the primary election may be more crucial than the general election in certain parts of texas

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that ohio election law forbidding all anonymous political leafletting violated the first amendment but noting that the right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing, and any written notice or other document shall be deemed to have been duly given (i) on the date of personal service on the parties, (ii) on the third business day after mailing, if the document is mailed by registered or certified mail, (iii) one day after being sent by professional or overnight courier or messenger service guaranteeing one-day delivery, with receipt confirmed by the courier, or (iv) on the date of transmission if sent by telegram, telex, telecopy or other means of electronic transmission resulting in written copies, with receipt confirmed. Any such notice shall be delivered or addressed to the parties at the addresses set forth below or at the most recent address specified by the addressee through written notice under this provision. Failure to give notice in accordance with any of the foregoing methods shall not defeat the effectiveness of notice actually received by the addressee.

assistant: Notices