flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither the Company, nor any of its affiliates, nor any person acting on its or their behalf has, directly or indirectly, made any offers or sales of any security or solicited any offers to buy any security, under circumstances that would cause the Offering to be integrated with prior offerings by the Company for purposes of the Securities Act that would require the registration of any such securities under the Securities Act.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 425 F.3d 20, 22-23 (1st Cir.2005) (mandatory conditions); United States v. Tulloch, 380 F.3d 8, 13-14 & n. 8 (1st Cir.2004) (per curiam) (standard conditions). We also note that at least two other circuits have held that defendants have constructive notice for “special” conditions that become “recommended” when certain criteria are met. See, e.g., United States v. Torres-Aguilar, 352 F.3d 934, 937 (5th Cir.2003); United States v. Asunción-Pimental, 290 F.3d 91, 94 (2d Cir.2002) (stating that, where specific factors necessary to make “special” conditions “recommended” are present, “these ‘special’ conditions are no different in practical terms from ‘standard’ conditions, that is, they are generally recommended”). But see United States v. Thomas, 299 F.3d 150, 155 (2d Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). The financial disclosure condition imposed by Options: A. holding that further supervised release may be ordered as a sentence for violation of supervised release B. holding that for purposes of revoking supervised release the applicable guidelines are those in effect at the time of the supervised release violations rather than those in effect at the time of initial offense C. holding that the failure to articulate orally that conditions 5d13d2 and 3 apply to a defendants sentence of supervised release does not create a conflict with the judgment imposing these conditions D. recognizing that probation officers are mandated to enforce a sentencing courts terms and conditions of supervised release E. holding that conditions announced for the first time in a written judgment that govern more than the basic administration of supervised release violate a defendants right to be present at sentencing

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that conditions announced for the first time in a written judgment that govern more than the basic administration of supervised release violate a defendants right to be present at sentencing
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any provision of this Agreement shall be held or deemed to be, or shall in fact be, invalid, inoperative or unenforceable as applied to any particular case in any jurisdiction or jurisdictions, or in all jurisdictions or in all cases, because of the conflict of any provision with any constitution or statute or rule of public policy or for any other reason, such circumstance shall not have the effect of rendering the provision or provisions in question invalid, inoperative or unenforceable in any other jurisdiction or in any other case or circumstance or of rendering any other provision or provisions herein contained invalid, inoperative or unenforceable to the extent that such other provisions are not themselves actually in conflict with such constitution, statute or rule of public policy, but this Agreement shall be reformed and construed in any such jurisdiction or case as if such invalid, inoperative or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein and such provision reformed so that it would be valid, operative and enforceable to the maximum extent permitted in such jurisdiction or in such case.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: reads: The pledge of allegiance to the flag ... shall be rendered by students standing with the right hand over the heart. The pledge of allegiance to the flag shall be recited at the beginning of the day in each public elementary, middle, and high school in the state. Each student shall be informed by posting a notice in a conspicuous place that the student has the right not to participate in reciting the pledge. Upon written request by his or her parent, the student must be excused from reciting the pledge. 2 . See Circle Schools v. Pappert, 381 F.3d 172 (3d Cir.2004) (applying strict scrutiny to, and holding unconstitutional, a requirement that a parent must be notified if a child chooses not to say the pledge); Sherman v. Cmty. Consol. Sch. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); Goetz v. Ansell, 477 F.2d 636, 637-38 (2d Options: A. holding a regulation is contentneutral as long as it is justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech B. holding that it may not C. holding that mandamus is only available to confine an inferior comt to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so D. holding that congress may impose its will on the states as long as it is acting within the powers granted by the constitution E. holding that a school may have its classes recite the pledge so long as it does not compel pupils to espouse its content

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a school may have its classes recite the pledge so long as it does not compel pupils to espouse its content
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Fla. Bar v. Heptner, 887 So.2d 1036 (Fla.2004) (lawyer found guilty of violating rule 3-5.1(g)). With regard to counts IV and V, D’Am-brosio violated rule 4 — 1.5(f)(1) (written contingency fee agreement). Appelman’s testimony reveals that there was no written contingency agreement in either the mortgage foreclosure case or the personal injury case. Thus, the referee’s finding that D’Ambrosio violated rule 4 — 1.5(f)(1), which requires a contingency fee agreement to be in writing, is supported. In addition to these rule violations, the referee found four aggravating factors: (1) a pattern of misconduct; (2) multiple offenses; (3) a refusal to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his conduct; and (4) previous disciplinary offenses. See Fla. Bar v. Temmer, 753 So.2d 555 (Fla.1999) (<HOLDING>). Further, the referee specifically found that Options: A. recognizing that the district court is not limited to only convictions when deciding whether to depart it may consider uncharged misconduct provided that there is sufficient proof of the misconduct B. holding that two instances of misconduct do not indicate a persistent and widespread pattern of misconduct that amounts to a city custom or policy of overlooking police misconduct C. recognizing that the court sanctions more harshly for cumulative misconduct than for isolated misconduct D. holding that something more than a mere error of law is required to constitute misconduct E. holding that a refusal to make false statements that no misconduct occurred is a very different circumstance than an affirmative statement of misconduct

assistant: The best answer is C. recognizing that the court sanctions more harshly for cumulative misconduct than for isolated misconduct
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any provision of this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction. To the extent permitted by Applicable Law, the Parties hereto hereby waive any provision of law that renders any provision hereof prohibited or unenforceable in any respect.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement (including all exhibits, schedules and any other attachments) and the Closing Documents constitute the entire understanding between the parties hereto regarding the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede any and all previous communications and understandings between the parties (including any bid, indication of interest, commitment letter, or letter of interest) regarding the subject matter of this Agreement.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company may terminate the Executive ’ s employment if he is disabled and unable to perform the essential functions of the Executive ’ s then existing position or positions under this Agreement with or without reasonable accommodation for a period of 180 days (which need not be consecutive) in any 12-month period. If any question shall arise as to whether during any period the Executive is disabled so as to be unable to perform the essential functions of the Executive ’ s then existing position or positions with or without reasonable accommodation, the Executive may, and at the request of the Company shall, submit to the Company a certification in reasonable detail by a physician selected by the Company to whom the Executive or the Executive ’ s guardian has no reasonable objection as to whether the Executive is so disabled or how long such disability is expected to continue, and such certification shall for the purposes of this Agreement be conclusive of the issue. The Executive shall cooperate with any reasonable request of the physician in connection with such certification. If such question shall arise and the Executive shall fail to submit such certification, the Company ’ s determination of such issue shall be binding on the Executive. Nothing in this Section 3(b) shall be construed to waive the Executive ’ s rights, if any, under existing law including, without limitation, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §2601 et seq . and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq.

assistant: Disability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: blizzard entertainment reserves the right to terminate this agreement as follows : if you fail to comply with any terms contained in this agreement , blizzard entertainment will provide you with a warning of your non-compliance .

assistant: Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: the following sections survive any termination of this user agreement : fees , content , disclaimer of warranties ; limitation of liability ; release , indemnity , legal disputes , and general .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any Person having rights under any provision of this Agreement shall be entitled to enforce their rights under this Agreement specifically to recover damages by reason of any breach of any provision of this Agreement and to exercise all other rights existing in their favor; provided , however the parties hereto stipulate that the remedies at law of any party hereto in the event of any default or threatened default by any other party hereto in the performance of or compliance with the terms hereof are not and will not be adequate and that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, such terms may be specifically enforced (without posting a bond or other security) by a decree for the specific performance thereof, whether by an injunction against violation thereof or otherwise.

assistant: Remedies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: duty of care is a threshold requirement. Domagala, 805 N.W.2d at 22. A. RDI argues, and the district court agreed, that Integrity was vicariously liable for the conduct of the attorney Integrity appointed to represent RDI. The question of whether an attorney appointed to represent an insured to defend a claim is an agent for the insurer is one that has divided courts, and often turns on specific facts. Compare Smoot v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 299 F.2d 525, 530 (5th Cir.1962) (applying Georgia law and stating that “[t]hose whom the insurer selects to execute its promises, whether attorneys, physicians, no less than company-employed adjusters, are its agents for whom it has the customary legal liability”), and Stumpf v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 102 Or.App. 302, 794 P.2d 1228, 1232 (1990) (<HOLDING>), with Ingersoll-Rand Equip. Corp. v. Transp. Options: A. holding that a hospital was not vicariously liable for sexual abuse by an orderly B. holding that in waiving a latenotiee defense insurer waived that defense as to any claim arising out of the occurrence in question C. holding that defense counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for presenting a diminished capacity defense as opposed to a defense of legal insanity D. holding that insurer must pay for defense after it declined to provide a defense and coverage was found to exist E. holding insurer vicariously liable for defense counsels negligent defense of a medical malpractice claim

assistant: The best answer is E. holding insurer vicariously liable for defense counsels negligent defense of a medical malpractice claim
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “must make findings adequate to support the closure,” Waller, 467 U.S. at 48, 104 S.Ct. 2210; accord Gibbons, 555 F.3d at 116; Ayala v. Speckard, 131 F.3d 62, 69 (2d Cir.1997) (in banc). In other words, if a court intends to exclude the public from a criminal proceeding, it must first analyze the Waller factors and make specific findings with regard to those factors. If a trial court fails to adhere to this procedure, any intentional closure is unjustified and will, in all but the rarest of cases, require reversal. E.g., Presley, 130 S.Ct. at 725. Here, despite not making any Waller findings, the district court intentionally excluded the public from the courtroom for the entirety of voir dire. On these facts alone, the closure was unjustified. See Waller, 467 U.S. at 48, 104 S.Ct. 2210 (<HOLDING>). Nevertheless, even if we accept Delaney’s Options: A. recognizing appellate courts must not make fact findings B. holding the trial court must make findings adequate to support a closure C. holding that trial court must make findings of fact on all material factual issues that involve ultimate issues in divorce and must make findings that characterize and value each asset or liability on which disputed evidence was presented D. holding that carter mandates that where the trial court failed to make the requisite casespecific findings of fact closure of the courtroom violated the defendants right to a public trial E. holding that the fourth waller factor was satisfied despite the lack of specific findings of fact where the information gleaned from the record was sufficient to support the partial temporary closure of petitioners trial

assistant: The best answer is B. holding the trial court must make findings adequate to support a closure
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In exercising its rights under this Agreement, Licensee agrees that the business operated by it in connection with the Licensed Marks shall comply with all Laws and requirements of any Governmental Entity in the Territory or elsewhere as may be applicable to the operation of its businesses and shall notify Licensor of any action that must be taken to comply with such Laws or requirements. Licensee shall promptly provide Licensor with copies of all communications with any Governmental Entity relating to the Licensed Marks or the Licensed Services.

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 54 N.C.App. 176, 282 S.E.2d 543 (1981) (stating where the North Carolina Industrial Commission had determined the claimant had suffered a compensable injury by accident, but had not yet determined an award of compensation although it entered an order for costs, the appeal was premature; the court stated since the award of compensation the plaintiff is entitled to receive had not been determined, no final award had been entered for purposes of appellate review); see also Sign Plex v. Tholl, 863 So.2d 1113 (Ala.Civ.App.2003) (stating a judgment determining only the compensability of an injury, but which contains no provision specifying the amount of compensation, was not a final judgment for purposes of appeal). 7 . Chastain v. Spartan Mills, 228 S.C. 61, 65, 88 S.E.2d 836, 837 (1955) (<HOLDING>). However, the Court did not cite to any Options: A. holding the commissions order reversing an award and remanding the case to the single commissioner to take further testimony was not final and not appealable to the circuit court until the commissions final determination regarding the single commissioners award the court construed the language in a provision of the code that states appeals from the commission to the circuit court shall be under the same terms and conditions as govern appeals in ordinary civil actions and stated an appeal to the circuit court will not lie from an interlocutory order of the commission unless it affects the merits citation omitted B. holding the order of the circuit court did not involve the merits of the action and was therefore interlocutory and not reviewable by the supreme court for lack of finality C. holding that because the single commissioners award is not a final adjudication a party may not appeal directly to the circuit court D. holding that an order by the trial court remanding the cause to the agency to impose a sanction other than the one imposed by the agency was not a final and appealable order because it did not terminate the litigation between the parties on the merits E. holding an appeal from a circuit court order remanding a workers compensation case for the purpose of making specific findings of fact is interlocutory and not reviewable by the court of appeals

assistant: The best answer is A. holding the commissions order reversing an award and remanding the case to the single commissioner to take further testimony was not final and not appealable to the circuit court until the commissions final determination regarding the single commissioners award the court construed the language in a provision of the code that states appeals from the commission to the circuit court shall be under the same terms and conditions as govern appeals in ordinary civil actions and stated an appeal to the circuit court will not lie from an interlocutory order of the commission unless it affects the merits citation omitted
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) Without affecting the lien or charge created by this Mortgage upon any portion of the Mortgaged Property not then or theretofore released as security for the full amount of the Obligations, Mortgagee may, from time to time and without notice, agree to (i) release any person liable for the indebtedness borrowed or guaranteed under the Transaction Documents, (ii) extend the maturity or alter any of the terms of the indebtedness borrowed or guaranteed under the Transaction Documents or any other guaranty thereof, (iii) grant other indulgences, (iv) release or reconvey, or cause to be released or reconveyed at any time at Mortgagee’s option any parcel, portion or all of the Mortgaged Property, (v) take or release any other or additional security for any obligation herein mentioned, or (vi) make compositions or other arrangements with debtors in relation thereto.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company agrees to employ Executive, and Executive agrees to be employed by the Company, for a period beginning on the Effective Date and continuing until terminated by either party. Executive will serve initially in the position of Chief Merchandising Officer and will have those duties and responsibilities that the Company assigns to Executive from time to time. The Company, in its sole discretion, may assign Executive a different position or title, or new or different duties and responsibilities, from time to time during Executive’s employment with the Company.

assistant: Employment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: home implicated a different strand of Fourth Amendment doctrine not at issue here — that "even.if armed with an arrest warrant, police must generally have a search warrant to enter lawfully a third person's home.” Joyce, 112 F.3d at 21-22 (citing Steagald, 451 U.S. at 212-13, 101 S.Ct. 1642). 7 . Defendants argue that the arrest became "in-progress” and. a "hot pursuit” began when the police announced that Morse was under arrest and threatened to enter the home, but Morse did not surrender. However, it was well-established in 2009 that circumstances deliberately created by the police cannot give-rise to an exigency that justifies a warrantless entry. See United States v. Curzi, 867 F.2d 36, 43 n.6 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Rengifo, 858 F.2d 800, 804 (1st Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>), abrogated by Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452, Options: A. holding that once the scene was secure exigent circumstances no longer existed and the police were required to obtain a search warrant B. holding that exigent circumstances were created by dissipation of bloodalcohol content in time needed to obtain a warrant C. recognizing that exigent circumstances do not excuse the failure to secure a warrant when those circumstances are created by government officials who unreasonably and deliberately delay or avoid obtaining the warrant D. recognizing exigent circumstance exception to warrant requirement E. holding that absent consent or exigent circumstances law enforcement officers cannot legally search for the subject of an arrest warrant in the home of a third party without first obtaining a search warrant

assistant: The best answer is C. recognizing that exigent circumstances do not excuse the failure to secure a warrant when those circumstances are created by government officials who unreasonably and deliberately delay or avoid obtaining the warrant
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: disbursements made by the debtors;. the Fifth Circuit noted that "outside the plan” had greater significance under the pre-Code Bankruptcy Act, because secured creditors whose claims were dealt with by a plan were entitled to vote — therefore, stating that payments to a secured creditor were being made "outside the plan” might eliminate the secured creditor’s right to vote on the plan; the Fifth Circuit held that it is permissible for Chapter 13 debtors to make plan payments directly to a mortgage lender, in connection with curing and maintaining a mortgage, but when they do, it is still considered payments “under the plan ” ). 20 . Kessler, 2015 WL 4726794 at *3 (citing In re Harris, 107 B.R. 204, 208 (Bankr.D.Neb.1989)); see also In re Heinzle, 511 B.R. 69, 78 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.2014) (<HOLDING>). 21 . Id. at 78. 22 . 11 U.S.C. § 1329(c). 23 Options: A. holding that a plan provision stating that the summary plan description and summaries of material modifications are hereby incorporated by reference and constitute a part of the plan acted to incorporate into the plan a limitations provision found only in the summary plan description B. holding that a payment is under the plan when the debt is provided for in the plan C. holding that professionals who advised the plan were not fiduciaries because they had no decision making authority over the plan or plan assets also noting that the power to act for the plan is essential to status as a fiduciary D. holding that although the plan cannot discharge the debt the claimant may otherwise subject the debt to the provisions of a confirmed plan E. holding that plan language giving plan administrator power to determine which employees are eligible to participate in the plan and providing all parties dealing with the plan an interpretation of plan provisions on request indicates deferential standard of review of trustee eligibility decisions

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a payment is under the plan when the debt is provided for in the plan
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you and yahoo agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the courts located within the county of santa clara , california or the northern district of california , and agree to waive any and all objections to the exercise of jurisdiction over the parties by such courts and to venue in such courts .

assistant: Jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Executive’s initial annual base salary is $330,000, which is subject to review and redetermination by the The annual base salary in effect at any given time is referred to herein as “Base Salary.” The Base Salary will be payable in a manner that is consistent with the Company’s usual payroll practices for senior executives.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: satisfy this latter burden, plaintiff must allege that he was ‘injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962.’ ” Id. at 17 (citations omitted). The defendants attack the Complaint under the second element set forth above, namely that the plaintiff has failed to sufficiently allege two or more predicate acts sufficient to support a cause of action under RICO. The Complaint alleges essentially three separate categories of predicate acts: (1) mail fraud; (2) bribery; and (3) money laundering. 1. Mail fraud As this Court has recognized in the past, predicate acts based on some type of fraud, such as mail fraud must meet the more rigorous pleading requirements set forth under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b). See, e.g., Morrow v. Black, 742 F.Supp. 1199, 1203 (E.D.N.Y.1990) (<HOLDING>). Rule 9(b) provides: In all averments of fraud Options: A. recognizing applicability of discovery rule B. recognizing the applicability of rule 9b under such circumstances C. recognizing the applicability of the mcdonough standard to federal criminal proceedings D. recognizing the presumptions applicability to federal statutes E. recognizing rule

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing the applicability of rule 9b under such circumstances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The provisions of the Plan shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflict of law provisions of any state to the extent not preempted by federal law. To the extent permitted by applicable law, any action, demand, claim or counterclaim arising under this Plan shall be tried by a judge alone, and not by a civil jury.

assistant: Applicable Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of ImmunoGen and Biotest agrees to duly execute and deliver, or cause to be duly executed and delivered, such further instruments and do and cause to be done such further acts and things, including, without limitation, the filing of such additional assignments, agreements, documents and instruments, as the other Party may at any time and from time to time reasonably request in connection with this Agreement or to carry out more effectively the provisions and purposes of, or to better assure and confirm unto such other Party its rights and remedies under, this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: The Recipient shall refrain from directly or indirectly disclosing any of the Confidential Information to any person, firm, fund, or entity, or knowingly making any Confidential Information available to any others for any use (other than as permitted by this Agreement). In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing provisions, the Recipient shall: (a) Restrict disclosure of the Confidential Information only to those of the persons as may be absolutely necessary;

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: receiving medical treatment in the United States, evidence and testimony being easily accessible in this forum, and counsel for both parties being based in this forum, the fact that United States limitation law applies also weighs against dismissal. See, e.g., Argonaut P’ship, 1997 WL 45521, at *15 (stating that “courts have denied forum non conveniens motions where a related action, requiring much of the same evidence, was pending also in the jurisdiction and could not be dismissed”); Maritima Aragua, 823 F.Supp. at 147 (denying a motion to dismiss on the basis of forum non conveniens and stating that the “crucial factor in the case at bar [was] the presence of the Limitation Proceeding brought by the [shipowners]”); id. at 150-51; see also Am. President Lines, 890 F.Supp. at 318 (<HOLDING>); Geophysical Serv., 590 F.Supp. at 1357, 1361 Options: A. holding that issue concerning forum non conveniens decision was not suitable for interlocutory appeal in part because a forum non conveniens decision is inherently factsensitive B. holding that a court can dismiss a case under forum non conveniens before resolving any other jurisdictional issues C. holding that the jones act does not preempt state law in applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens and thus state law governs D. holding that a district court may dismiss based on forum non conveniens without first addressing personal jurisdiction E. holding that the doctrine of forum non conveniens did not compel dismissal of related actions for limitation of vessel owners liability

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the doctrine of forum non conveniens did not compel dismissal of related actions for limitation of vessel owners liability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: threaten his partner and cut tbe microphone off her cab radio or why the two of them would select the backwoods as the place for their tryst. One must suppose that when the defendant drove off in the victim’s cab, he could reasonably believe that she was making him a gift of the vehicle in gratitude for his participation in her scheme of revenge on her errant spouse. 23 C. Wright and K. Graham, Federal Practice and Procedure: Evidence § 5387 at 583 (Pocket Part 1993). We would leave the issue of an appropriate balance between the rights of defendants and rape victims which are beyond the facts of this case for another day. 46.1 Forensic fables For another example, see U.S. v. Dorsey, C.M.A., 1983, 16 Mil.Jus. 1. 46.2 After the rape U.S. v. Colon-Angueira, C.M.A., 1983, 16 Mil. Jus. 20 Options: A. holding in all cases that where the evidence of guilt was sufficient any error in the exclusion of lastminute evidence and testimony was harmless error B. holding that any error was harmless and thus not plain error C. recognizing that where the error involved defies analysis by harmless error standards or the data is insufficient to conduct a meaningful harmless error analysis then the error will not be proven harmless beyond a reasonable doubt D. holding exclusion was harmless error E. holding the exclusion of cumulative evidence was not prejudicial error

assistant: The best answer is D. holding exclusion was harmless error
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single contract. This Amendment shall become effective when all conditions precedent have been met and when the Agent has executed it and received counterparts bearing the signatures of all other parties hereto. Delivery of a signature page of this Amendment by telecopy shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of such agreement. This Amendment may be executed and delivered by facsimile or electronic mail, and will have the same force and effect as manually signed originals.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company agrees to execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, all such other papers and to take all such other actions within its power as the Administrative Agent may reasonably request from time to time in order to carry out the purposes of this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Community corrections centers are residences in the community with custodial structure and strong emphasis on guidance and counseling. These centers serve those inmates who qualify and who should benefit from a gradual reintegration into society. 6 . Section 21.1a was added by Section 5 of the Act of August 24, 1951, P.L. 1401, as amended, 61 P.S. § 331.21a. 7 . The Court noted that while a convict may be on parole from a particular offense, he might be confined in prison for another offense, in a mental institution or in an enemy prison camp during a war. While not literally “at liberty,” that parolee would not be entitled to credit on his sentence for these types of confinement. 8 . See also Wagner v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 846 A.2d 187 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004) (<HOLDING>). 9 . See also McMillian v. Pennsylvania Board Options: A. holding that where the plaintiffs evidence supported a finding that the defendants had applied force to restrain him the jury must determine not only whether the officers were justified in using force at all but if so whether the degree of force actually used was reasonable B. holding that time spent at a facility was not the functional equivalent of incarceration where no force would be used to restrain anyone who left without permission and where staff members were counselors and not law officers C. holding that there was no actual prejudice where the defendant has the functional equivalent of the notice required D. holding that pennsylvania national guard members could be used for civilian law enforcement because they were not in federal service at the time E. holding that defining the class to include anyone who received such a call without prior express consent means that only those potential members who would prevail on this liability issue would be members of the class

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that time spent at a facility was not the functional equivalent of incarceration where no force would be used to restrain anyone who left without permission and where staff members were counselors and not law officers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower agrees to protect, indemnify and save harmless Lender, and all directors, officers, employees and agents of Lender, from and against any and all (i) claims, demands and causes of action of any nature whatsoever brought by any Person not a party to this Agreement and arising from or related or incident to this Agreement or any other Loan Document, including, without limitation, any liability under federal or state securities laws arising out of Lender’s disposition of all or part of the Collateral, (ii) costs and expenses incident to the defense of such claims, demands and causes of action, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and (iii) liabilities, judgments, settlements, penalties and assessments arising from such claims, demands and causes of action; provided, however, that Borrower does not agree to indemnify Lender against Lender’s own fraud, gross negligence, or willful misconduct, or any liabilities resulting therefrom. The indemnity contained in this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

assistant: Indemnity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Waiver shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York. The parties agree that the state and federal courts located in New York County, New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any action, proceeding or dispute arising out of this Waiver and the parties submit to the personal jurisdiction of such courts.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 393 N.W.2d 286, 290-91 (S.D.1986). • GILBERTSON, Chief Justice, (dissenting).. [¶ 26.] I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the lower court on Issue 2. I would hold the trial court erred when it granted partial summary judgment to 01-esens, holding City’s operation of food service at the municipal bar was an ultra vires act. [¶27.] An express grant of authority from the legislature “includes those incidental or implied powers that are necessary to enable a municipality to perform the function authorized.” City of Rapid City v. Rensch, 77 S.D. 242, 246, 90 N.W.2d 380, 383 (1958) (citation omitted). A municipality is vested with discretion as to how it exercises specific powers conferred upon it by the legislature, as long as the methods employed are n , 59 N.W.2d 732, 734 (1953) (<HOLDING>). Actions taken under a municipality’s implied Options: A. holding municipality had implied authority to enter into a long term contract to establish a golf course although state statute did not specifically grant authority to establish golf courses as public parks B. holding grant of authority to an agency to adopt rules necessary to carry out this chapter clearly vested in the agency authority to interpret a statute C. holding that the governments attorney had the implicit authority to bind the government although the contracting officer had the express authority D. holding that plaintiff had no authority or statutory right for actions proper course was to report actions to proper legal authority E. holding the court has the inherent authority to enter an order of confidentiality

assistant: The best answer is A. holding municipality had implied authority to enter into a long term contract to establish a golf course although state statute did not specifically grant authority to establish golf courses as public parks
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: first clause inoperative. If N.J.S.A 39:4-88(b) prohibits nothing more than a lane change conducted unsafely as described in the statute’s second clause, then the Legislature’s language in the first clause would have no meaning. When construing a statute, “ ‘[l]egislative language must not, if reasonably avoidable, be found to be inoperative, superfluous or meaningless.’ ” Franklin Tower One, L.L.C. v. N.M., 157 N.J. 602, 613, 725 A.2d 1104 (1999) (quoting In re Sussex Cnty. Mun. Utils. Auth 5 (2001) (construing Md.Code Ann., Transp., § 21-309 to describe one offense); State v. Lafferty, 291 Mont. 157, 967 P.2d 363, 366 (1998) (construing Mont.Code Ann. § 61-8-328 to prohibit only unsafe lane changes into other traffic lanes); State v. McBroom, 179 Or.App. 120, 39 P.3d 226, 229 (2002) (<HOLDING>); Hernandez v. State, 983 S.W.2d 867, 870-72 Options: A. recognizing that a statute should be read as comprehensive whole B. holding that related provisions should be read together C. holding that two clauses of orrevstat ann 811370 should be read together D. holding that limitations from the specification should not be read into the claims E. holding that government contracts must be read as if they included clauses required by law

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that two clauses of orrevstat ann 811370 should be read together
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: There are no actions, investigations, suits or proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, threatened, at law, in equity or in arbitration, before any court, other Governmental Authority, arbitrator or other Person, (i) against or affecting any of the Restricted Parties or any of their respective properties that, if adversely determined, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, or (ii) with respect to this Agreement, any of the other Credit Documents, any of the other Transaction Documents or any of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Directly or indirectly use the proceeds of any Borrowing for any purpose which would breach the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the UK Bribery Act 2010, or would create a material breach of other similar anti-corruption legislation in other jurisdictions .

assistant: Anti-Corruption Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Such Seller is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement, to enter into Transactions contemplated hereunder and to perform its obligations hereunder and has taken all necessary action to authorize such execution, delivery and performance. Such Seller will engage in such Transactions as principal. The person signing this Agreement on behalf of such Seller is duly authorized to do so on such Seller’s behalf. Such Seller has obtained all authorizations of any governmental body required in connection with this Agreement and the Transactions hereunder and such authorizations are in full force and effect.

assistant: Authorizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: ( e ) a statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright or intellectual property owner , its agent , or the law ; and

assistant: None