flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Pursuant to Company policy, and to the extent not set forth in the Compensation Schedule, the Company shall reimburse the Employee for all authorized travel and other reasonable expenses incurred by her in furtherance of the Company’s business upon the Employee’s presentation of an itemized account of expenditures.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Court in no way suggests, and perhaps with its use of the term “all” implies the contrary, all streets, sidewalks, and parks on a public university are non-traditional public fora. Indeed, the Court’s reading is in tension with its position a public university campus contains a variety of fora. See Justice for All v. Faulkner, 410 F.3d 760, 766 (5th Cir.2005); Ala. Student Party v. Student Gov’t Ass’n, 867 F.2d 1344, 1354 n. 6 (11th Cir.1989) (Tjoflat, J., dissenting). If a public university contains a space which is properly considered a traditional public forum, which it almost certainly does, I cannot think of a more appropriate traditional public forum than a street, sidewalk, or park. For this reason, I disagree with Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Mote, 423 F.3d 438 (4th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Mote stands for the proposition the campus as Options: A. holding because the campus is an institution of higher learning its outdoor areas are not held open to the general public B. holding that for purposes of aerial surveillance using sophisticated equipment the open areas of an industrial or business complex are not analogous to the curtilage of a dwelling but falls somewhere between open fields and curtilage C. recognizing a university campus as limited public forum D. holding that the public use exception was not applicable because the injury to the tenants employee occurred in an area of the leased premises that was not open to the public but was used only by employees E. holding that investigator who covertly videotaped plaintiff playing the piano during a church service attended by over 140 people which was open to the general public and at which no signs were posted indicating that videotaping was prohibited did not violate plaintiffs physical solitude and seclusion because it simply captured activity that was open to the public observed by many and which the investigator or any other of the church attendees could have testified to witnessing at trial moreover it is undisputed that the investigator confined his videotaped surveillance to areas of the church that were open to the public

assistant: The best answer is A. holding because the campus is an institution of higher learning its outdoor areas are not held open to the general public
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Notwithstanding anything in the Loan Documents to the contrary, each Lender party hereto hereby acknowledges, consents and agrees (x) that the Borrower may repay the Residual Loans in full in cash on or prior to the Residual Loans Maturity Date, without having to make a pro rata payment on account of the other Advances then outstanding, (y) to the amendment of Section 2.5(a) of the Term Loan Agreement as provided herein and (z) to the payment of the various fees, the Applicable Premium and Call Premium, in each case, as applicable and as contemplated by the Second Amendment.

assistant: Consents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: by accepting this agreement you waive and hold harmless all members of the viber group from any claims resulting from any action taken by any member of the viber group during or as a result of its investigations and/or from any actions taken as a consequnce of investigations by either a member of the viber group or law enforcement authorities .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 2001, more than two months after their requests for hearings were made. On July 11, 2001, the Henrys and Skarphol moved the ALJ to dismiss the administrative actions against them based on the Commissioner’s failure to abide by the time limits set forth in N.D.C.C. § 10-04-12(2). The ALJ de nied the motions to dismiss and the Commissioner adopted the ALJ’s decision. The Henrys and Skarphol appealed to the district court, which affirmed the Commissioner’s order. On appeal to this Court, the Henrys and Skarphol contend the administrative actions against them should be dismissed because the Commissioner violated N.D.C.C. § 10-04-12(2) by faffing to set the hearings within 30 days of their requests. ' II [¶ 5] Before we consider the merits of an appeal, we must have jurisdiction. Nodak M 6) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 9] In line with this reasoning, this Court Options: A. holding that an order of consolidation is interlocutory and not immediately appealable B. holding an order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable C. holding that a rehearing order is interlocutory and not appealable D. holding that the denial of a motion to remand is interlocutory and not immediately appealable E. holding that an order was interlocutory in nature despite the trial courts certification of the order as a final appealable judgment

assistant: The best answer is B. holding an order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All representations and warranties made by WOD in this Agreement shall be true and correct on and as of the Closing Date as if again made by WOD, as applicable, on and as of such date and insofar as any inconsistency or inaccuracy does not or will not have a Material Adverse Effect, except insofar as the representations and warranties relate expressly and solely to a particular date or period, in which case, subject to the limitations applicable to the particular date or period, they will be true and correct on and as of the Closing Date with respect to such date or period.

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This 2019-A Servicing Supplement will be terminated in the event that the Basic Servicing Agreement is terminated in accordance therewith and may also be terminated at the option of the Servicer or the Titling Trust at any time following the payment in full of the 2019-A Exchange Note; provided, that the rights and obligations of the parties under Section 3.04 will survive any such termination.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement (including any Schedules hereto) constitutes the full and entire understanding and agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and any other written or oral agreement relating to the subject matter hereof existing between the parties is expressly canceled; provided, that, for the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing shall not affect the rights and obligations of the parties under the Share Exchange Agreement or any Ancillary Document, including the Registration Rights Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall limit any of the rights or remedies of Purchaser and the DT Representative or any of the obligations of the Restricted Holders under any other agreement between the Restricted Holders and Purchaser or the DT Representative or any certificate or instrument executed by the Restricted Holders in favor of Purchaser or the DT Representative, and nothing in any other agreement, certificate or instrument shall limit any of the rights or remedies of Purchaser or the DT Representative or any of the obligations of the Restricted Holders under this Agreement.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No failure by Agent or any Lender to exercise any right, remedy, or option under this Agreement or any other Loan Document, or delay by Agent or any Lender in exercising the same, will operate as a waiver thereof. No waiver by Agent or any Lender will be effective unless it is in writing, and then only to the extent specifically stated. No waiver by Agent or any Lender on any occasion shall affect or diminish Agent’s and each Lender’s rights thereafter to require strict performance by Borrower of any provision of this Agreement. Agent’s and each Lender’s rights under this Agreement and the other Loan Documents will be cumulative and not exclusive of any other right or remedy that Agent or any Lender may have.

assistant: No Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of either statute. Even considering the facts in a light most favorable to his claim, we see that Anders’s panic disorder lasted, at most, from sometime around November 6 until shortly after November 12. After it was diagnosed he testified, “things ... panned out greatly,” and he could do his job “110 percent.” As the Supreme Court ruled in Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky. v. Williams, a short-term impairment such as this does not rise to the level of disability as defined by the ADA. See 534 U.S. 184, 195, 122 S.Ct. 681, 151 L.Ed.2d 615 (2002). Instead, Anders must have demonstrated that the impairment limited a major life activity on a permanent or long-term basis. Id. at 195, 198, 122 S.Ct. 681; see also Ogborn v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, 305 F.3d 763, 767-68 (7th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, Anders’s inability to meet the Options: A. holding an eight week bout of depression was not a disability as defined by the ada B. holding that whether a person has a disability under the ada is an individualized inquiry C. holding evidence of a 13 permanent partial disability insufficient to establish disability for purposes of ada D. holding that an employer cannot be held liable under the ada if it had no knowledge of the employees alleged disability E. holding that epilepsy qualifies as a disability under the ada

assistant: The best answer is A. holding an eight week bout of depression was not a disability as defined by the ada
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 306(a)(7)), Paulette petitioned this court for leave to appeal the disqualification, which was allowed. On appeal, Paulette contends the court improperly disqualified Matern because Margaret failed to establish either the existence of an attorney-client relationship between herself and Matern, or that such representation was substantially related to Matern’s representation of Paulette individually. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order disqualifying counsel. BACKGROUND Michael F. Gagliardo Estate The following are undisputed facts concerning the underlying action, which involves Michael’s complex estate. Michael and Paulette worked for and owned equal interests in various Gagliardo family businesses. Of the numerous family bu were also trustees of the other’s special trust (<HOLDING>). Upon Michael’s death, Paulette became trustee Options: A. holding 245 of cfg B. holding that denial of receipt of notice of trial did not rebut presumption of trial courts certificate of mailing of notice requiring an evidentiary hearing C. holding that the disciplinary rules of the code of professional responsibility are not laws of the state of texas for purposes of statute which excludes the admission of evidence obtained in violation of law D. holding 23 of cfg E. holding that title 23 section 470 of the virgin islands code creates an affirmative defense to the crime of unauthorized possession of a firearm in violation of title 14 section 2253a of the virgin islands code

assistant: The best answer is D. holding 23 of cfg
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: wrongful death claims.”); Williamson v. Patterson (In re Patterson), 150 B.R. 367, 368 (E.D.Va.1993) (“Congress has mandated trial in the district court of personal injury tort actions, 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(5), and thereby specifically excepted such actions from bankruptcy court jurisdiction.”); Ferino v. Cohen (In re Cohen), 107 B.R. 453, 455 (S.D.N.Y.1989) (“This implication follows generally from 28 U.S.C. § 157, and particularly from § 157(b)(2)(B) and (5) which exclude ‘personal injury tort or wrongful death claims’ which must be tried in the district court.”); In re Nifong, No. 08-80034, 2008 WL 2203149, *1 (Bankr.M.D.N.C. May 27, 2008) (Stocks, J.) (2008 WL 22031 discrimination is not a personal injury tort); In re Atron Inc. of Michigan, 172 B.R. 541, 545 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.1994) (<HOLDING>); In the Matter of Interco, Inc., 135 B.R. 359, Options: A. holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort B. holding that a civil rights deprivation is a personal injury tort C. holding that sexual harassment is a personal injury tort D. holding that a negligence claim is not a personal injury tort claim E. holding that age discrimination is not a personal injury tort

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that party. Bates & Rogers Construction Corp. v. Greeley & Hansen, 109 Ill. 2d 225, 232 (1985). “The rule is, that the right of a l. App. 3d 175, 179 (1989) (determining that a contract between the general contractor and a subcontractor did not directly benefit the owner where the contract expressly stated that it was the parties’ intent that no contractual relationship should exist between the owner and the subcontractor); (4) Barney v. Unity Paving, Inc., 266 Ill. App. 3d 13, 19-20 (1994) (concluding that a bus passenger was not a third-party beneficiary to a contract between the city and contractors which obligated the contractors to require all subcontractors to have motor vehicle insurance); and (5) Federal Insurance Co. v. Turner Construction Co., 277 Ill. App. 3d 262, 269 (1995) (<HOLDING>). While none of these cases is directly on Options: A. holding that the tenant was not a holdover tenant despite retaining keys because the tenant recognized the termination of the tenancy relinquished possession of the premises and the landlord was able to gain access to the property B. holding that where the landlord was aware the tenant had moved out a tenant who attached a lock to the door and accidentally retained the keys to the lock was not a holdover tenant C. holding that where the will did not provide the life tenant with the power to sell and it was not necessary to sell the property for the payment of estate expenses the life tenant was not entitled to the proceeds from the sale of the property instead the proceeds became a part of the residuary estate D. holding that after township acquired property entered into lease with tenant that was renewable absent notice of termination and terminated lease tenant was not displaced person because tenant will be moving not as a result of the acquisition of such real property but rather because township having already acquired the property has merely declined to renew the lease quotation omitted E. holding that a subcontracting agreement was not for the direct benefit of the tenant where the tenant was merely listed in titles on construction drawings and the indemnification provisions did not identify any third parties

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a subcontracting agreement was not for the direct benefit of the tenant where the tenant was merely listed in titles on construction drawings and the indemnification provisions did not identify any third parties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: additionally , you can not access or use the fitbit service if you are barred from receiving services under applicable law or have previously been suspended or removed from the fitbit service .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you agree that the license includes the right to copy , analyze and use any of your content as linden lab may deem necessary or desirable for purposes of debugging , testing , or providing support or development services in connection with the service and future improvements to the service .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if there is a conflict between these terms and terms and conditions applicable to a specific area or feature of the airbnb platform , the latter terms and conditions will take precedence with respect to your access to or use of that area or feature , unless specified otherwise .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, and the Confidentiality Agreement, dated March 2, 2016 between the Company and Macellum, contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and may be amended only by an agreement in writing executed by the parties hereto.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the defendant discovered or could have discovered the basis for the motion, whichever is first. Id. Defendant argues the constraints of § 1867 only apply to challenges brought under the Act, not Sixth Amendment challenges such as his. A. Whether Defendant’s failure to comply with the time limits under the Act bars his Sixth Amendment challenge presents a difficult issue. Section § 1867(e) of the Act provides: The procedures prescribed by this section shall be the exclusive means by which a person accused of a Federal crime ... may challenge any jury on the ground that such jury was not selected in conformity with the provisions of this title. Nothing in this section shall preclu ’s requirements to constitutional challenges. United States v. Green, 742 F.2d 609, 612 (11th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>). Our cases addressing this question have not Options: A. recognizing that the government generally has the right to insist on performance in strict compliance with the contract specifications B. holding that strict compliance is not required C. recognizing that strict compliance with 1557 is required D. holding that a party may gain judicial review without exhausting its administrative remedies where pursuit of administrative remedies would be futile where strict compliance would cause irreparable harm and where the applicable statute is alleged to be void on its face E. holding that in the absence of strict compliance with 1867 defendants attempt to challenge the jury venire on constitutional grounds is without legal effect and is futile

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that in the absence of strict compliance with 1867 defendants attempt to challenge the jury venire on constitutional grounds is without legal effect and is futile
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Your Grant Notice and this Award Agreement shall be governed, construed, interpreted, and administered solely in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware, without regard to principles of conflicts of law, with consent of jurisdiction by you in the State of New York.

assistant: Applicable Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, together with the other Loan Documents, comprises the complete and integrated agreement of the parties on the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, on such subject matter. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and those of any other Loan Document, the provisions of this Agreement shall control; provided that the inclusion of supplemental rights or remedies in favor of the Agents or the Lenders in any other Loan Document shall not be deemed a conflict with this Agreement. Each Loan Document was drafted with the joint participation of the respective parties thereto and shall be construed neither against nor in favor of any party, but rather in accordance with the fair meaning thereof.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as set forth on Schedule 3.1(a) , the Company has no direct or indirect Subsidiaries other than the Subsidiaries. The Company owns, directly or indirectly, all of the capital stock of the Bank or comparable equity interests of each Subsidiary, and such interests are, except as set forth on Schedule 3.1(a) , owned free and clear of any and all Liens, and all the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock or comparable equity interest of each Subsidiary are validly issued and are fully paid, non-assessable, and free of preemptive and similar rights to subscribe for or purchase securities.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: You represent and agree that: (a) you have carefully read and understand this Agreement and, in particular, the General Release, Waiver and Covenant Not to Sue contained in paragraph 4 above, and fully understand the final and binding effect of same; (b) you were advised to consult legal counsel before signing this Agreement and have had the opportunity to do so; (c) you are not entitled to the consideration set forth in this Agreement, but for your signing this Agreement; (d) you are signing this Agreement knowingly and voluntarily and for reasons of your own; and (e) the Company has not made any representations inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement.

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any Lender may at any time, without the consent of, or notice to, any Borrower, the Administrative Agent, any Swing Line Lender or any L/C Issuer, sell participations to any Person (other than a natural Person, a Defaulting Lender or the Company or any of the Company’s Affiliates or Subsidiaries) (each, a “ Participant ”) in all or a portion of such Lender’s rights and/or obligations under this Agreement (including all or a portion of its Commitment and/or the Loans (including such Lender’s participations in L/C Obligations and/or Swing Line Loans) owing to it); provided that (i) such Lender’s obligations under this Agreement shall remain unchanged, (ii) such Lender shall remain solely responsible to the other parties hereto for the performance of such obligations and (iii) the Borrowers, the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and each L/C Issuer shall continue to deal solely and directly with such Lender in connection with such Lender’s rights and obligations under this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, each Lender shall be responsible for the indemnity under Section 10.04 without regard to the existence of any participation.

assistant: Participations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower will from time to time execute and deliver to Bank such documents, and take or cause to be taken, all such other or further action, as Bank may request in order to effect and confirm or vest more securely in Bank all rights contemplated by this Agreement and the other Loan Documents (including, without limitation, to correct clerical errors) or to vest more fully in or assure to the Bank the security interest in the Collateral granted to the Bank by this Agreement or to comply with applicable statute or law and to facilitate the collection of the Collateral (including, without limitation, the execution of stock transfer orders and stock powers, endorsement of promissory notes and instruments and notifications to obligors on the Collateral). To the extent permitted by applicable law, Borrower authorizes the Bank to file financing statements, continuation statements or amendments, and any such financing statements, continuation statements or amendments may be filed at any time in any jurisdiction. Bank may at any time and from time to time file financing statements, continuation statements and amendments thereto which contain any information required by the Code for the sufficiency or filing office acceptance of any financing statement, continuation statement or amendment, including whether Borrower is an organization, the type of organization and any organization identification number issued to Borrower. Borrower agrees to furnish any such information to Bank promptly upon request. In addition, Borrower shall at any time and from time to time take such steps as Bank may reasonably request for Bank (i) to obtain an acknowledgment, in form and substance satisfactory to Bank, of any bailee having possession of any of the Collateral that the bailee holds such Collateral for Bank, (ii) to obtain “control” (as defined in the Code) of any Collateral comprised of deposit accounts, electronic chattel paper, letter of credit rights or investment property, with any agreements establishing control to be in form and substance satisfactory to Bank, and (iii) otherwise to insure the continued perfection and priority of Bank’s security interest in any of the Collateral and the preservation of its rights therein. Borrower hereby constitutes Bank its attorney-in-fact to execute, if necessary, and file all filings required or so requested for the foregoing purposes, all acts of such attorney being hereby ratified and confirmed; and such power, being coupled with an interest, shall be irrevocable until this Agreement terminates in accordance with its terms, all Obligations are irrevocably paid in full and the Collateral is released.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: -pursuant to Mass. Gen. L. ch. 60, § 65. In November of 1995, RTC Trust filed a complaint to foreclose the mortgage against Findley in the Massachusetts Land Court. Judgment was granted in RTC Trust’s favor, a foreclosure sale occurred, and a foreclosure deed was issued by RTC Trust in favor of S/N-l on or about October 3,1996. DISCUSSION A. The Tax Injunction Act (TIA) Defendant Fall River asserts that this court lacks subject matter juris diction under the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341, which states, “The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law w ate law would be inadequate under the “plain, speedy, and efficient” exception to the TIA. See Ludwin v. City of Cambridge, 592 F.2d 606, 609 (1st Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff also does not contest that its Options: A. holding that federal common law governs equitable remedies available under erisa B. holding that where the question to be resolved in the declaratory judgment action will be decided in a pending action it is inappropriate to grant a declaratory judgment C. holding that federal law governs remedies available under title ix D. holding that the remedies available under massachusetts law to challenge tax assessments were sufficient to preclude federal declaratory action E. holding that the judicial immunity available to federal officers extends to section 1983 actions for declaratory and injunctive relief

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the remedies available under massachusetts law to challenge tax assessments were sufficient to preclude federal declaratory action
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All Taxes (including any interest or penalties relating thereto) and assessments which are due and payable have been duly reported, fully paid and discharged as reported by the Company and each of its Subsidiaries, and there are no unpaid Taxes which are, or could become, payable by the Company or any Subsidiary or an Encumbrance on the properties and assets of the Company or any Subsidiary, except as provided for in the Financial Statements, or have been incurred in the normal course of business of the Company or its Subsidiaries since that date. All Tax Returns of the Company and each of its Subsidiaries and their predecessors have been filed and all Taxes payable by the Company and each of its Subsidiaries and their predecessors have been paid. There are no disputes as to Taxes of any nature payable by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or their predecessors.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Lenders and the Agent shall have received all fees required to be paid, and all expenses for which invoices have been presented by three (3) Business Days prior to the Closing Date (including the reasonable documented fees and expenses of legal counsel), on or before the Closing Date.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to establish probable cause for defendant’s arrest. Neither was defendant’s confession obtained by trickery, duress, or in violation of his right to counsel. Because defendant’s arrest and Gardin’s seizure of the white gold watch and topaz ring were valid, there is no unconstitutional activity to taint the confession which followed adequate Miranda warnings and defendant’s knowing and intelligent waiver of rights. Defendant’s allegations of duress are meritless since they arise only from the fact that while questioning defendant, law enforcement officials confronted him with the white gold watch and topaz ring seized from his bedroom by Curtis Gardin. Because these items were lawfully obtained, their exclusion is not required under State v. Silva, 304 N.C. 122, 282 S.E.2d 448 (1981) (<HOLDING>). We consequently overrule this assignment of Options: A. holding that evidence seized pursuant to a warrant based on materially false and misleading information is inadmissible at trial B. holding that confronting a defendant with unlawfully seized evidence renders a subsequent statement involuntary and therefore inadmissible C. holding under 3901 that because officers entered without knocking and announcing the subsequent arrest was invalid and the evidence seized inadmissible D. holding all evidence be suppressed traceable to the unlawfully seized E. holding that the admission of unlawfully seized evidence of a crime was admissible if the jury was instructed that the evidence could be considered only in assessing a defendants credibility and not for determining guilt

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that confronting a defendant with unlawfully seized evidence renders a subsequent statement involuntary and therefore inadmissible
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: note that it is your responsibility to be aware of such notices , and you hereby acknowledge and agree that blizzard entertainment shall not be responsible for any damages which may arise from your failure to read and/or be aware of these publicly posted notices .

assistant: Limitation of liability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All demands, notices and communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered or mailed by registered or certified first-class United States mail, postage prepaid, hand delivery, prepaid courier service, or by facsimile or by electronic transmission, and addressed in each case as set forth on Schedule I hereto or at such other address as shall be designated in a written notice to the other parties hereto. Any notice required or permitted to be mailed to a Noteholder shall be given by first class mail, postage prepaid, at the address of such Noteholder as shown in the Note Register. Delivery shall occur only upon receipt or reported tender of such communication by an officer of the recipient entitled to receive such notices located at the address of such recipient for notices hereunder; provided , however , that any notice to a Noteholder mailed within the time prescribed in this Agreement shall be conclusively presumed to have been duly given, whether or not the Noteholder shall receive such notice.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: it up” does not tend to show that Justin in fact had a pornography problem. Second, evidence of an interest in pornography does not make an interest in child pornography more or less probable and thus fails to corroborate the existence of a fact of consequence — that is, Justin’s having downloaded child pornography onto Campana’s computer. Though the Supreme Court and the Sixth Circuit have recognized that the standard for relevancy is “liberal,” such relevance does not exist when the proposed evidence, if true, is of no consequence to the trial. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 587, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993); Churchwell v. Bluegrass Marine, Inc., 444 F.3d 898, 905 (6th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Wagner, 382 F.3d 598, 616 (6th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). Where, as here, the district court prevented Options: A. holding that the race of the prosecutor is irrelevant B. holding that upon remand if the trial court determined that the testimony in a newly discovered evidence claim was reliable the trial court must review that new evidence as well as brady claims that were previously rejected in a prior postconviction motion because the evidence was equally accessible to the defense and there was no reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different had the evidence been disclosed C. holding that evidence was irrelevant when it concerned facts that if true were of no consequence to the defendants trial D. holding if a party has access to information that would have led to the true facts that party has no right to rely on a prior false representation E. holding that evidence of five prior antitrust actions brought against the defendants was irrelevant on issue of defendants motive to conspire and noting that simply because the defendants were named in past antitrust cases involving similar allegations does not make it more probable that the defendants had a motive to carry out their conspiracy

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that evidence was irrelevant when it concerned facts that if true were of no consequence to the defendants trial
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: violation is one of federal law, a different result obtains. In fact, the Court of Appeals has held that UCL claims may be based on federal statutes, unless the federal statute completely preempts the action. See Lippitt, 340 F.3d at 1042. Defendant does not contend that plaintiffs UCL claim is preempted. Moreover, it has not tendered any evidence that by its amendment of 12 U.S.C. § 2604(c), Congress intended to bar pri vate enforcement for failure to provide a GFE under 24 C.F.R. § 3500.7(b)(1). Because Wells Fargo has failed to tender any evidence that it ensured that a GFE was provided to plaintiff, its conduct violated RESPA, which constituted an unlawful business practice under the UCL. See McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc., 142 Cal.App.4th 1457, 1471-1472, 49 Cal. Rptr.3d 227 (<HOLDING>). Plaintiffs motion is therefore granted on Options: A. holding that a loan transaction is a business practice under the ucl B. holding that consideration for guaranty of loan previously made was that guarantors friend the bank manager who issued the loan would not lose his job for making a bad loan C. holding out admission to practice law when not admitted to practice D. holding that where parties to an oral loan agreed that the loan would be repaid on demand the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the date plaintiff demanded repayment of the loan E. holding that fraudulent loan transaction exposed financial institutions to risk of loss even though loan was secured

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a loan transaction is a business practice under the ucl
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and those documents expressly referred to herein (including the Reorganization Agreement, Stockholders Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement and the Tax Receivable Agreement) embody the entire agreement and understanding among the parties and supersede and preempt any prior understandings, agreements or representations by or among the parties, written or oral, which may have related to the subject matter hereof in any way. The Fourth A&R LLC Agreement is superseded in its entirety by this Agreement as of the Effective Time and shall be of no further force and effect thereafter except for the limited purposes as contemplated by Section 3.03(b).

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive shall be entitled to receive such benefits and to participate in such employee group benefit plans, including life, health and disability insurance policies, and financial planning services, and other perquisites and plans as are generally provided by the Company to its other senior executives in accordance with the plans, practices and programs of the Company, as amended and in effect from time to time. In addition, Executive shall have the right during the Term to use the Company’s jet aircraft for personal purposes for up to eighty (80) flight hours per calendar year (without carryover), provided in each case that such aircraft has not already been scheduled for use for Company business. The Company will report taxable income to Executive in respect of personal use of such aircraft as required by law.

assistant: Benefits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: them to believe their acts did not violate [Mr. Seitz’s] rights.” Oliveira v. Mayer, 23 F.3d 642, 648 (2d Cir.1994). The Supreme Court has held that qualified immunity attaches not only when the police officer acted reasonably and thus did not violate an established constitutional right, but also when he reasonably believed that his conduct did not violate that right. Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 641, 107 S.Ct. 3034, 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1967) (“The relevant question ... is the objective (albeit fact-specific) question whether a reasonable officer could have believed [the officer’s warrantless search to be lawful, in light of clearly established law and the information the searching officers possessed.”); see also Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001) (<HOLDING>). The second Circuit has referred to an Options: A. holding that a defendant charged with voluntary manslaughter would be entitled to an acquittal on the ground of selfdefense if he reasonably believed that he was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm from which he could save himself only by using deadly force B. holding that an officers use of force against a plaintiff was objectively reasonable considering the force the plaintiff herself exercised in resisting police custody C. holding that a military police officer was entitled to qualified immunity from an excessive force suit when he objectively reasonably believed that he used reasonable force D. holding that inquiry as to whether officers are entitled to qualified immunity for use of excessive force is distinct from inquiry on the merits of the excessive force claim E. holding in an excessive force suit there can be no doubt that the police officer defendant was acting in his discretionary capacity when he arrested plaintiff

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a military police officer was entitled to qualified immunity from an excessive force suit when he objectively reasonably believed that he used reasonable force
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: care described in Dr. Helge’s report with James’s resulting injury. However, after describing that injury in his report, Dr. Rushing states specifically that the injury was “a result of improper amphetamine prescription and improper supervision.” [Emphasis added.] To fulfill the requirements of section 74.351(i) by supplementing Dr. Helge’s report as to Dr. Davisson, Dr. Rushing was not required to mention Dr. Helge’s exact description of the standard of care applicable to Dr. Davisson, especially when, as here, that standard of care is accurately described as a failure to properly supervise or monitor, which is precisely the conduct that Dr. Rushing implicates as causing James’s injuries. See Packard v. Guerra, 252 S.W.3d 511, 526-27 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>); Perez v. Salinas, No. 13-08-00192-CV, 2008 WL Options: A. holding that we must first determine our jurisdiction before proceeding to the merits of the appeal B. holding that court was within its discretion to refuse to consider reports that did not meet the supreme courts standards for admitting reports into evidence C. recognizing that we have consistently held that a party who wishes to introduce evidence of past false reports of sexual assault bears the threshold burden of establishing the falsity of the past reports D. holding that we must review multiple reports in the aggregate to determine if they are adequate as to liability and causation E. holding that if no material issues of fact are in dispute and an appeal presents only a question of law we apply de novo review

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that we must review multiple reports in the aggregate to determine if they are adequate as to liability and causation