flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any of the provisions of this Release are determined to be invalid by a court, arbitrator, or government agency of competent jurisdiction, the Parties agree that such a determination shall not affect the enforceability of the other provisions herein.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 375 N.E.2d 1192 (1978). Two of Gunther’s theories are easily eliminated. First, a plaintiff is a member of a protected class if she asserts “a claim based on sex discrimination as a pregnant woman.” White v. University of Mass., 410 Mass. 553, 557, 574 N.E.2d 356 (1991). There is no allegation that Gunther’s termination was motivated by animus toward her pregnancy because at the time of her discharge she was not pregnant and had been working for over eight months in a managerial position with equivalent salary. Second, to the extent that Gunther is claiming she was discriminated against as a single mother, she can not prevail. Parenthood is not listed as a protected class in the statute. See G.L. c. 151B, § 4; cf. Upton v. JWP Businessland, 425 Mass. 756, 758-59, 682 N.E.2d 1357 (1997) (<HOLDING>). With respect to the claim of pure gender Options: A. recognizing tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy B. recognizing public policy exception to atwill doctrine C. holding that it was not a violation of public policy for the defendant to discharge the plaintiff an atwill employee because she was a single mother unwilling to work newly imposed long hours D. holding that an employee could maintain a claim for constructive discharge in violation of virginias public policy exception to the employment atwill doctrine E. holding that an atwill employee may not recover for discriminatory discharge under section 1981 because the atwill relationship was not sufficiently contractual under tennessee law

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that it was not a violation of public policy for the defendant to discharge the plaintiff an atwill employee because she was a single mother unwilling to work newly imposed long hours
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: A failure by any party to assert its rights under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such rights, nor shall any waiver be implied from any act or omission. No waiver by a party with respect to any right shall extend its effect to any subsequent breach of the terms hereof of like or different kind unless such waiver explicitly provides otherwise.

assistant: No Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Loan Party will, and will cause each Subsidiary to, (a) maintain with financially sound and reputable carriers (having, in the case of any Loan Party, a financial strength rating of at least A- by A.M. Best Company) (i) insurance in such amounts (with no greater risk retention) and against such risks (including loss or damage by fire and loss in transit; theft, burglary, pilferage, larceny, embezzlement, and other criminal activities; business interruption; and general liability) and such other hazards, as is customarily maintained by companies of established repute engaged in the same or similar businesses operating in the same or similar locations and (ii) all insurance required pursuant to the Collateral Documents and (b) maintain flood insurance in compliance with applicable Flood Insurance Laws. The Borrowers will furnish to the Lenders, upon request of the Administrative Agent, information in reasonable detail as to the insurance so maintained. All insurance policies required hereunder and under any Security Agreement shall name the applicable Agent (for the benefit of such Agent and the applicable Lenders) as an additional insured or (unless, with respect to local policies, not commercially available in the relevant market) as loss payee, as applicable, and shall contain loss payable clauses (unless, with respect to local policies, not commercially available in the relevant market) or mortgagee clauses, through endorsements in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the applicable Agent, which provide that: (i) all proceeds thereunder with respect to any Collateral shall be payable to the applicable Agent; and (ii) such policy and loss payable or mortgagee clauses may be canceled, amended, or terminated only upon at least thirty days prior written notice given to the applicable Agent. All premiums on any such insurance shall be paid when due by such Loan Party, and copies of the policies delivered to the applicable Agent. If such Loan Party fails to obtain any insurance as required by this Section, the applicable Agent may obtain such insurance at the U.S. Borrower’s expense. By purchasing such insurance, no Agent shall be deemed to have waived any Default arising from the Loan Party’s failure to maintain such insurance or pay any premiums therefor.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Plan is intended to be an unfunded plan maintained primarily to provide deferred compensation benefits for a select group of “ management or highly compensated employees ” within the meaning of Sections 201, 301 and 401 of ERISA and therefore to be exempt from Parts 2, 3 and 4 of Title I of ERISA. To the extent any provision of, or legal issue relating to, this Plan is not fully preempted by federal law, such issue or provision shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement is personal to Executive and shall not be assignable by Executive without the prior written consent of the Company. This Agreement and any rights and benefits hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by Executive’s legal representatives, heirs or legatees. This Agreement and any rights and benefits hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Company and its successors and assigns, including any corporation with which or into which the Company may be merged or which may succeed to its assets or business.

assistant: Successors
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: insurance carriers mentioned in section 14 are the confidential communications with Horizon’s legal counsel and Horizon’s insurance carriers referred to in section 3.10. Under the plain meaning of the contract between Aon and Horizon, Aon is not Horizon’s agent except when Aon communicates with Horizon’s legal counsel or passes on these communications with counsel to Horizon’s insurance carriers. However, relative to the alleged acts or omissions at issue in this case, Horizon’s claims ai*e not based on any such communications. Therefore, we conclude that Aon was not acting as Horizon’s agent under the unambiguous language of the Agreement. See Environmental Procedures, Inc. v. Guidry, 282 S.W.3d 602, 626-29, 2009 WL 237063, at *16-18 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, no pet. h.) (<HOLDING>); Ramco Oil & Gas Ltd. v. Anglo-Dutch (Tenge) Options: A. holding there was no evidence to support the existence of any alleged fiduciary duty B. holding that an attorney who breaches a fiduciary duty to a client forfeits his right to compensation without any requirement that the client prove actual harm C. holding that broker owed no fiduciary duty to client as a matter of law D. holding law enforcement owed duty similar to that owed by dshs under rcw 2644050 E. holding that relationship between executor and estates beneficiaries is one that gives rise to fiduciary duty as matter of law

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that broker owed no fiduciary duty to client as a matter of law
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in Brause v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 21 P.3d 357, 360 (Alaska 2001), challenged its constitutionality, but because we held that their claim was not ripe for adjudication, we did not consider the statute's constitutionality. Id. Its constitutionality was not raised in ACLU. 41 . AS 25.05.013 was enacted in 1996. Ch. 21, § 2, SLA 1996. The legislature in 1998 adopted the resolution that proposed the Marriage Amendment. - Voters approved the Marriage Amendment in 1998. S.J. Res. 42, 20th Leg., 2d Sess. (Alaska 1998). 42 . - As we observed in ACLU, a state constitutional amendment that expressly denied benefits to same-sex couples would arguably offend the federal Constitution. 122 P.3d at 786 n. 20 (citing Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 116 S.Ct. 1620, 134 L.Ed.2d 855 (1996) (<HOLDING>)). 43 . The published statement supporting Options: A. holding that a colorado amendment prohibiting legislative judicial or executive action designed to protect gays and lesbians from discrimination violated the equal protection clause B. holding that the due process clause contained in the colorado constitution encompasses a guarantee of equal protection C. holding that the multicounty signature requirement for initiatives violated the uniform operation of laws clause and the federal equal protection clause D. holding that an amendment to the colorado constitution that repealed all local and statewide laws prohibiting sexualorientation discrimination violated the federal equal protection clause E. holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that an amendment to the colorado constitution that repealed all local and statewide laws prohibiting sexualorientation discrimination violated the federal equal protection clause
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: On the date of each Purchase and/or reinvestment hereunder, and on the date each Information Package, Weekly Report or other report is delivered to the Administrator, any Purchaser Agent or any Purchaser hereunder, the Seller and the Servicer shall each be deemed to have certified that (i) all representations and warranties of the Seller and the Servicer, as applicable, described in this Exhibit III , as from time to time amended in accordance with the terms hereof, are true and correct in all material respects on and as of such day as though made on and as of such day, except for representations and warranties which apply as to an earlier date (in which case such representations and warranties shall be true and correct as of such date), (ii) no event has occurred and is continuing, or would result from such Purchase or reinvestment, that constitutes a Termination Event or an Unmatured Termination Event.

assistant: Warranties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of funds and announcement of an intention to draw funds, it expands the scope of conduct that violates the Dealership Act. To determine whether the Amendment adversely affects AHM’s substantive rights, we compare AHM’s rights under the Dealership Act before and after the Amendment became effective. If the application of the Amendment creates a new disability in respect to past transactions, the Amendment affects substantive rights and may not be applied retrospectively. See Lessard v. City of Manchester Fire Dep’t, 118 N.H. 43, 47 (1978) (an amendment should not be applied retrospectively “so as to create a new obligation, impose a new duty or attach a new disability in respect to past transactions” (quotation omitted)); see also Martin v. Pat’s Peak, 158 N.H. 735, 737, 742-43 (2009) (<HOLDING>). Resolving this issue requires us to interpret Options: A. holding that new rule applied purely prospectively primarily because of reliance factor B. holding that where a legislative amendment changed the exemption provisions of a tax statute defining those eligible for certain exemptions and refunds the amendment could only be applied to tax years after its effective date even where the legislature expressly stated the amendment should have retroactive effect and looked to the law in place during the taxable events to determine if the taxpayer was eligible for a refund C. holding that bradley governs whether a statute is to be applied prospectively or retroactively D. holding that a statute which affects a matter still in litigation when the statute becomes effective will be applied by a reviewing court even though the statute was not then law when the decision appealed from was handed down unless the legislature expresses a contrary intent E. holding that even when legislature only sought to clarify a statutory ambiguity by defining a term the amendment applied prospectively because the clarified intent was not clearly expressed in original version of the statute

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that even when legislature only sought to clarify a statutory ambiguity by defining a term the amendment applied prospectively because the clarified intent was not clearly expressed in original version of the statute
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If Celgene determines to undertake the Prosecution and Maintenance of a Prothena Licensed Collaboration Patent or Licensed Program Patent (other than a Prothena Platform Patent) in accordance with this Section 6.8, Prothena agrees to make its employees, agents and consultants reasonably available to Celgene (and to Celgene’s authorized attorneys, agents or representatives) to enable Celgene to undertake such Prosecution and Maintenance. In addition, Prothena shall (and shall cause its Affiliates and its and their employees, agents and consultants to) provide reasonable assistance to Celgene (and to Celgene’s authorized attorneys, agents or representatives) to enable Celgene to undertake such Prosecution and Maintenance, including by executing powers of attorney and other documents for Celgene to undertake such Prosecution and Maintenance.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: apparently finds the extension of time for payment (majority at 88) was prejudicial to the rights of the judgment creditor. But quite to the contrary, an extension of time to repay a loan is generally presumed beneficial to junior lienors, not prejudicial. See, e.g., Crutchfield v. Johnson & Latimer, 243 Ala. 73, 8 So. 2d 412, 414 (1942); Lennar N.E. Partners v. Buice, 49 Cal. App. 4th 1576, 57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 435, 439 (1996) (citing Resolution Trust Corp. v. BVS Dev., Inc., 42 F.3d 1206, 1215 (9th Cir. 1994)); Eurovest Ltd. v. 13290 Biscayne Island Terrace Corp., 559 So. 2d 1198, 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990); Larson Cement Stone Co. v. Redlim Realty Co., 179 Neb. 134, 137 N.W.2d 241, 245 (1965). But see Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank v. Smith, 277 S.C. 162, 284 S.E.2d 770, 772 (1981) (<HOLDING>). Instead of a note amortized over 15 years Options: A. holding that although alabama state law would give a mortgagee who erroneously recorded a release of a mortgage an equitable right to have the mortgage retroactively reinstated reinstatement would have resulted in relating back the perfection of the mortgage to the original recording date in violation of treas reg 3016323hla2 B. holding that a mortgage transfer does not take effect until the mortgagee gives value in exchange for the mortgage C. holding that a bank holding a chattel mortgage on an automobile damaged in a collision had an equitable lien in insurance proceeds because the mortgage required mortgagor to insure the vehicle and name mortgagee as a loss payee D. holding that in a case in which an omitted junior mortgagee foreclosed its mortgage the junior mortgagee had the absolute right to redeem from the senior mortgagee who had purchased the property at a sale following foreclosure of the senior mortgage E. holding extension of senior mortgage resulted in loss of priority because intervening mortgagee had agreed to be subordinated on the assumption the senior mortgage would be fully satisfied on the initial due date

assistant: The best answer is E. holding extension of senior mortgage resulted in loss of priority because intervening mortgagee had agreed to be subordinated on the assumption the senior mortgage would be fully satisfied on the initial due date
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: EACH LOAN PARTY AND THE AGENT HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT AND FOR ANY COUNTERCLAIM THEREIN.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: As explained above, the second Teague exception is available only if the new rule “alter[s] our understanding of the bedrock procedural elements” ’ essential to the fairness of a proceeding.” Sawyer v. Smith, 497 U. S. 227, 242 (1990) (quoting Teague v. Lane, 489 U. S. 288, 311 (1989) (plurality opinion), in turn quoting Mackey v. United States, 401 U. S. 667, 693 (1971) (Harlan, J., concurring in judgments in part and dissenting in part) (emphasis added)). Classifying an error as structural does not necessarily alter our understanding of these bedrock procedural elements. Nor can it be said that all new rules relating to due process (or even the “fundamental requirements of due process,” see post, at 674 (dissenting opinion)) alter such understanding. See, e. g., Sawyer, supra, at 244 (<HOLDING>); O’Dell v. Netherland, 521 U. S. 151, 167 Options: A. holding that the rule in caldwell v mississippi 472 u s 320 1985 did not fit within the second teague exception even though it added to an existing guarantee of due process protection against fundamental unfairness B. holding that the rule in simmons v south carolina 512 u s 154 1994 which has been described as serving one of the hallmarks of due process id at 175 oconnor j concurring in judgment did not fit within the second teague exception C. holding that exclusion of hearsay statements violated due process even though statements were not admissible under mississippi law which did not recognize declarations against penal interest as a exception to the rule against hearsay D. holding that the due process clause contained in the colorado constitution encompasses a guarantee of equal protection E. holding that rule which provided an additional measure of protection to existing prohibition on prosecutorial remarks that render a proceeding fundamentally unfair was not an absolute prerequisite to fundamental fairness that would fall within the second teague exception

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the rule in caldwell v mississippi 472 u s 320 1985 did not fit within the second teague exception even though it added to an existing guarantee of due process protection against fundamental unfairness
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: BUYER AND SELLER EACH WAIVE RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION BETWEEN THEM RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THE PROPERTY. The provisions of this Section 16(l) shall survive the Closing and any termination of this Agreement.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In addition to amounts payable as elsewhere provided in this Article III , each Borrower hereby agrees to protect, indemnify, pay and save harmless the Administrative Agent, each Issuing Bank and each Lender from and against any and all liabilities and costs which the Administrative Agent, any Issuing Bank or such Lender may incur or be subject to as a consequence, direct or indirect, of (i) the issuance of any Letter of Credit other than, in the case of an Issuing Bank, to the extent resulting from its gross negligence or willful misconduct, or (ii) the failure of an Issuing Bank to honor a drawing under a Letter of Credit as a result of any act or omission, whether rightful or wrongful, of any present or future de jure or de facto Governmental Authority (all such acts or omissions herein called “ Governmental Acts ”).

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive shall be indemnified by the Company as, and to the extent, provided in the memorandum and articles of association of the Company and as provided in Executive’s Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement dated October 10, 2012. The obligations under this paragraph shall survive termination of the Term.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: There is no claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation (or any counter or cross-claim in an action brought by or on behalf of Eton), whether at law or in equity, or before or by any governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, or before any arbitrator of any kind, that is pending or, to Eton’s Knowledge, threatened, against Eton, which (i) could reasonably be expected to adversely affect Eton’s ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement or the Patent Assignment or complete any of the transactions contemplated hereby; or (ii) involves the possibility of any judgment or liability, or which may become a claim, against the Assets, Harrow or its business. Eton is not subject to any judgment, order, writ, injunction, decree or award of any court, arbitrator or governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality having jurisdiction over Eton or any of the Assets that affects, involves or relates to the Assets.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and occupational experience and opine that his disabilities did not ‘preclude all forms of substantially gainful employment.’” 2 Vet.App. at 28. As the Court stated in Gleicher, when the Board fails to relate an appellant’s educational and occupational history to his disabilities, the Board “comes very close to placing upon the appellant the burden of showing he can’t get work.” Id. The statement provided by the Board in the present case is almost indistinguishable from the statement provided in Gleicher. Such reasoning was inadequate in Gleicher, decided more than two decades ago, and it is inadequate today. Consequently, I would remand the issue of TDIU to the Board to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its decision. See Tucker v. West, 11 Vet.App. 369, 374 (1998) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, I must respectfully dissent. 8 . Options: A. holding that remand is the appropriate remedy where inter alia the board has incorrectly applied the law B. holding that it is appropriate to remand to the plan administrator when the administrative record is incomplete C. holding that remand is the appropriate remedy where the board has incorrectly applied the law failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its determinations or where the record is otherwise inadequate D. holding that the district court was authorized to remand the proceedings to the board where the board failed to make required findings E. holding that where the appellant has failed to demonstrate error the court is not required to search the record for an error

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that remand is the appropriate remedy where the board has incorrectly applied the law failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its determinations or where the record is otherwise inadequate
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter addressed herein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings (whether written or oral and whether express or implied) that may exist between the Parties with regard to such subject matter, including but not limited to the Original Agreement.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Sixth Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Copies (whether photostatic, facsimile or otherwise) of this Sixth Amendment may be made and relied upon to the same extent as an original.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 465 U.S. 89, 100, 104 S.Ct. 900, 908, 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984). In addition, the Supreme Court of the United States has held that Congress did not intend for Section 1983 to overcome the sovereign immunity of states embodied in the Eleventh Amendment and therefore states and their arms are not “persons” who can be held liable under Section 1983. Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 66-67, 70, 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2309-10, 2311-12, 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989). With regard to state officials, the Eleventh Amendment bars suits in federal court that seek damages or other remedies that have the effect of providing retroactive monetary relief, but it does not bar suits in federal court that only see 2d 20 (1994); Robinson v. Court of Common Pleas, 827 F.Supp. 1210, 1211 (E.D.Pa.1993) (<HOLDING>). Given this protection, the Supreme Court of Options: A. holding california school district a state agency for purposes of the eleventh amendment B. holding that the supreme court of pennsylvania is a state entity for purposes of the eleventh amendment C. holding that the eleventh amendment did not apply to a compact clause entity D. recognizing the irony that a state officials conduct may be considered state action for fourteenth amendment purposes yet not for purposes of the eleventh amendment E. holding that a county is not an arm of the state for purposes of the eleventh amendment

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the supreme court of pennsylvania is a state entity for purposes of the eleventh amendment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: remedy, of equitable tolling,” an evidentiary hearing would have provided- him the opportunity to present his claims. To qualify for equitable tolling, a petitioner must first demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances caused his failure to timely file his petition. See Holland, 130 S.Ct. at 2562; LaCava v. Kyler, 398 F.3d 271, 276 (3d Cir.2005). Alicia allegedly suffered symptoms from a rota-tor cuff tear from March 1, 2007 to August 17, 2007. He contends he experienced persistent pain from his injury so that daily activities, such as feeding himself, were -painful. But his injury did not necessarily preclude opportunities to file, since prison officials or others could have assisted him in completing the forms. C.f. Arbas v. Nicholson, 403 F.3d 1379, 1381 (Fed.Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). In fact, Alicia filed his habeas petition two Options: A. holding that a petitioners mental incompetency can constitute extraordinary circumstances warranting equitable tolling if it interferes with his ability to communicate with his attorney B. recognizing that the court has the power to grant leave upon certain conditions C. recognizing the undesirability of prison conditions litigation D. holding that the failure to articulate orally that conditions 5d13d2 and 3 apply to a defendants sentence of supervised release does not create a conflict with the judgment imposing these conditions E. holding physical conditions justify tolling when those conditions impair cognitive function or the ability to communicate

assistant: The best answer is E. holding physical conditions justify tolling when those conditions impair cognitive function or the ability to communicate
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. at 115, 122 S.Ct. 2061 (internal citations and quotations omitted). An “unlawful employment practice” that constitutes a hostile work environment thus cannot be said to occur on any particular day, but rather occurs over a series of days or years. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. at 115, 122 S.Ct. 2061 (citing Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21, 114 S.Ct. 367, 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993)). Accordingly, so long as one of the incidents included within the claim of hostile environment occurred within the prescribed time limit, other conduct that occurred outside of the proscribed time period, but contributing to the hostile work environment, is not time barred. See Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. at 105, 122 S.Ct. 2061 (<HOLDING>); West v. Norton, 376 F.Supp.2d at 1129. In Options: A. holding that a plaintiff alleging a hostile work environment claim under title vii may seek damages for all behavior contributing to a hostile work environment claim including behavior allegedly occurring outside the limitations period provided that an act contributing to the claim occurs within the filing period B. holding that consideration of the entire scope of a hostile work environment claim including behavior alleged outside the statutory time period is permissible for the purposes of assessing liability so long as any act contributing to that hostile environment takes place within the statutory time period C. holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive D. holding that an individual could recover for acts occurring outside the statutory time period if at least one act occurred within the time period and the acts were part of the same hostile work environment E. recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that consideration of the entire scope of a hostile work environment claim including behavior alleged outside the statutory time period is permissible for the purposes of assessing liability so long as any act contributing to that hostile environment takes place within the statutory time period
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: It is understood and agreed by the Parties that money damages would be an insufficient remedy for any breach of this Agreement by any Party, that such breach would represent irreparable harm, and that each non-breaching Party shall be entitled to specific performance of the terms hereof and injunctive or other equitable relief (without the posting of any bond and without proof of actual damages), including an order of the Bankruptcy Court or other court of competent jurisdiction requiring any Party to comply promptly with any of its obligations hereunder, which remedy of specific performance shall be the Parties’ sole and exclusive remedies for any breach of the terms of this Agreement.

assistant: Specific Performance
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Sixth Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Loan Parties, the Banks, the Issuing Banks and the Administrative Agent and their respective successors and assigns, except that the Loan Parties shall not have the right to assign their rights hereunder or any interest herein.

assistant: Binding Effects
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither the execution and delivery of the Credit Documents, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated therein, nor performance of and compliance with the terms and provisions thereof by the Borrower will (a) violate or conflict with, in any material respect, any provision of its articles of incorporation or bylaws, (b) violate, contravene or conflict with, in any material respect, any law, regulation (including without limitation, Regulation U, Regulation X or any regulation promulgated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree or permit applicable to it, (c) except as would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, violate, contravene or conflict with contractual provisions of, or cause an event of default under, any indenture, loan agreement, mortgage, deed of trust, contract or other agreement or instrument to which it is a party or by which it or its properties may be bound, or (d) in any material respect, result in or require the creation of any Lien upon or with respect to its properties, other than a Permitted Lien.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: disclosure: “A record of an agency relating to a noncriminal investigation, including: .., -[i]nvestigative materials, notes, correspondence and reports.” Section 708(b)(17)(ii) of the RTKL (emphasis added). In the absence of definitions in the. RTKL for either “noncriminal” or “investigation,” we have concluded .that “noncriminal” applies to investigations- other than those which are criminal in nature and that “investigation” means “a systematic or searching inquiry, a detailed examination, or an official probe.” Dep’t of Health v. Office of Open Records, 4 A.3d 803, 810-811 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010). The inquiry, examination, or probe must be “conducted as part , of the agency’s official duties.” Id. at 814. See also Dep’t of Pub. Welfare v. Chawaga, 91 A.3d 257, 259 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014) (<HOLDING>). In the present case, the OOR determined that Options: A. holding that an official probe must be conducted pursuant to an agencys legislatively granted factfinding and investigative powers B. holding that an agencys reasonable reading of an ambiguous statute must be affirmed C. holding that the evidence must be sufficient to support the agencys findings of fact and that the agencys inferences from those facts must be reasonable D. holding an action taken by an administrative agency in excess of its statutory powers is the well recognized exception to the general rule that an agencys final order is immune from collateral attack E. recognizing a state agencys powers are limited to 1

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that an official probe must be conducted pursuant to an agencys legislatively granted factfinding and investigative powers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall prepare and file with the Commission such amendments, including post-effective amendments, and supplements to such Registration Statement and the prospectus used in connection therewith as may be necessary to keep such Registration Statement effective and in compliance with the provisions of the Securities Act until all Registrable Securities and other securities covered by such Registration Statement have been disposed of in accordance with the intended method(s) of distribution set forth in such Registration Statement or such securities have been withdrawn (the “ Effectiveness Period ”).

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parties may, by written agreement, (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the Parties, (b) waive compliance with, or modify, any of the covenants or conditions contained in this Agreement, and (c) waive or modify performance of any of the obligations of any of the Parties; provided that no such waiver or failure to insist upon strict compliance with such obligation, covenant, agreement or condition shall operate as a waiver of, or an estoppel with respect to, any subsequent insistence upon such strict compliance other than with respect to the matter so waived or modified.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All representations and warranties made by the Borrower in this Agreement, and in the certificates or other instruments prepared or delivered in connection with or pursuant to this Agreement, shall (i) be considered to have been relied upon by the Administrative Agent and the Lenders, (ii) survive the making of Loans and the issuance of Letters of Credit regardless of any investigation made by, or on behalf of, the Administrative Agent or any of the Lenders, and (iii) continue in full force and effect as long as the Revolving Credit Commitments have not been terminated and, thereafter, so long as any Loan, L/C Obligation, Commitment Fee , Letter of Credit fees or other amount payable under any Loan Document remains unpaid.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: or statements by decisionmakers unrelated to the decisional process. Rivers-Frison v. Southeast Mo. Community Treatment Ctr., 133 F.3d 616, 619 (8th Cir.1998) (internal citations omitted). Moreover, plaintiffs have not established that Hood had any role in the decisionmaking process at issue in this case. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that “ ‘some causal relationship is necessary to demonstrate the significance of non-contemporaneous statements, or statements made by persons other than the relevant decision-maker, to the resolution of the ultimate issue of intentional discrimination.’ ” Kohrt, 364 F.3d at 898 (quoting Hutson v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 63 F.3d 771, 779 (8th Cir.1995)); see Richards v. Farner-Bocken Co., 145 F.Supp.2d 978, 995-96 (N.D.Iowa 2001) (<HOLDING>). In this instance, there is no evidence that Options: A. recognizing that the seventh circuit consistently has held that isolated comments that are no more than stray remarks in the work place are insufficient to establish that a particular decision was motivated by discriminatory animus B. holding that comments which were considered by personnel board in normal course of considering employment action were relevant to establish discriminatory intent and were not just stray remarks C. holding that ageist comments by coworkers were merely stray remarks that while indicating an agediscriminatory animus on the part of those employees under the circumstances of the case were of no probative value as to the employers decisionmaking process D. holding that stray remarks made almost two years prior to employment action was outdated and lacking in apparent probative value E. holding that stray comments without more cannot establish a case of employment discrimination but if other indicia of discrimination are properly presented the remarks can no longer be deemed stray and the jury has a right to conclude that they bear a more ominous significance

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that ageist comments by coworkers were merely stray remarks that while indicating an agediscriminatory animus on the part of those employees under the circumstances of the case were of no probative value as to the employers decisionmaking process
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: detention of the van, its driver, and its passenger exceeded the valid reason for the initial stop and violated the Fourth Amendment. The subsequent search of the vehicle was an unconstitutional search, and the drugs and drug paraphernaha discovered were fruit of the poisonous tree. The trial court’s denial of appellants’ motions to suppress should have been granted. In light of this holding, we need not address the third point, that omissions of facts in Ramsey’s affidavit for search warrant undermined the drug dog’s reliability and amounted to a Franks violation; or the fourth point, that the search warrant was objectively unreasonable and that there was no basis for a nighttime search. Reversed and remanded. Hart, Robbins, and Neal, JJ. te, 84 Md. App. 243, 578 A.2d 816 (1990) (<HOLDING>). In this case, after Ramsey determined that Options: A. holding that coming from the wrong neighborhood does not give rise to reasonable suspicion B. holding innocent facts when considered together can give rise to reasonable suspicion C. holding that the fact that defendant granted consent to police to search some items and then refused to give consent to additional searches cannot support a finding of reasonable suspicion D. holding the drivers refusal to consent to search of automobile did not give rise to reasonable suspicion that vehicle contained narcotics E. holding that refusal to consent to search cannot support a finding of reasonable suspicion

assistant: The best answer is D. holding the drivers refusal to consent to search of automobile did not give rise to reasonable suspicion that vehicle contained narcotics
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to have Officer Tripp search the motel room and vehicle. Peterson gave his permission to search Baldón, but indicated he would like to be involved in the search and would promptly meet the police officers at the motel. Tripp learned Baldón was staying in room 29. When Peterson arrived, Officer Tripp had been joined by Sergeant Piazza and another Bettendorf police officer. The officers collectively approached room 29 and knocked on the door. Eventually, Baldón opened the door. A young woman, later revealed to be a minor, was observed sitting on the bed. Peterson greeted Baldón and explained that the parole agreement authorized the officers to conduct a search of the motel room and Baldon’s vehicle. The search of the motel room and Bal-don’s person yielded no .2d 999, 1001 (2012) (<HOLDING>); State v. Benton, 82 Ohio St.3d 316, 695 Options: A. holding that notwithstanding an agreement the state still must have reasonable grounds for investigating whether a parolee has violated the terms of parole or committed a crime B. holding that parole status alone is insufficient to justify search of a parolee C. holding parolee consented to search of his email based on the parole agreement D. holding that arrest of a parolee for parole violation does not trigger the speedy trial period for the underlying offense E. holding parolee waives constitutional searchandseizure rights by voluntarily signing parole agreement

assistant: The best answer is C. holding parolee consented to search of his email based on the parole agreement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Although the Guarantor party hereto has been informed of the matters set forth herein and has agreed to the same, such Guarantor understands, acknowledges and agrees that none of the Secured Parties has any obligations to inform such Guarantor of such matters in the future or to seek its acknowledgment or agreement to future amendments, restatements, supplements, changes, modifications, waivers or consents, and nothing herein shall create such a duty.

assistant: Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No broker, agent or other person acting as such on behalf of such Member or any of its Affiliates was instrumental in consummating this transaction, and no conversations or prior negotiations were had by such Member or any of its Affiliates with any broker, agent or other such person concerning the transaction that is the subject of this Agreement.

assistant: Brokers