flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company may terminate Executive’s employment if he becomes unable to perform the essential functions of his position as a result of his Disability. Upon any termination of the Term and Executive’s employment pursuant to this Section 6(c)(ii), Executive shall receive the Accrued Obligations. Additionally, Executive will receive a lump-sum payment (less applicable withholding taxes) equal to the Executive’s Target Bonus in the year of termination of employment due to Disability. Such lump-sum amount shall be payable upon the later of: (x) sixty (60) days following termination of employment due to Disability, or (y) such later date required by Section 15(g)(i). Executive shall not earn or accrue any additional or other benefits under this Agreement following the Termination Date.

assistant: Disability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: [Executive understands that this Agreement will be null and void if not executed by Executive no later the end of the [21 s ] 5 calendar day after the Agreement is provided to Executive for consideration. Each Party has seven days after that Party signs this Agreement to revoke it. This Agreement will become effective on the eighth (8th ) day after Executive signed this Agreement, so long as it has been signed by the Parties and has not been revoked by either Party before that date (the “ Effective Date ”).] 6 OR [This Agreement will be effective after it has been signed by both Parties (the “ Effective Date ”)] 7 .

assistant: Effective Dates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The US Borrower will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, enter into any arrangement with any Person providing for the leasing by the US Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries of real or personal property that has been or is to be sold or transferred by, the US Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, as applicable, to such Person or to any other Person to whom funds have been or are to be advanced by such Person on the security of such property or rental obligations of, the US Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, as applicable, except in connection with Qualified Securitization Transactions.

assistant: Sales
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: had at least an equal, if not a superior, knowledge of the nature and degree of the threat posed by McDonald and consequently had an equal or greater degree of foreseeability. See id. (proprietor lacked superior knowledge of threat posed by drunk customer where neither knew of perpetrator’s propensity for violence and both knew that customer was drunk and cursing and harassing customers); Johnson v. Atlanta Housing Auth., 243 Ga. App. 157, 160 (2) (532 SE2d 701) (2000) (where plaintiff knew of dangers in sitting on a bench at night in front of public housing where prior shootings had occurred on the block, his knowledge of the danger was at least equal to that of housing authority, precluding recovery); Griffin v. AAA Auto Club South, Inc., 221 Ga. App. 1, 2-3 (1) (470 SE2d 474) (1996) (<HOLDING>). Thus, Ratliff cannot establish superior Options: A. holding that an employees private arbitration agreement with her employer precluded her from filing suit against the employer under the adea B. holding that where employee gave notice to employer of injury and employer told employee that nothing could be done for him through workmans compensation employer had breached statute and was liable for medical treatment which was reasonable and necessary to restore employee to maximum usefulness C. holding that injured employee failed to state a claim under pwdcra even though he informed his employer that he could return to work in two months D. holding employee could proceed against employer in action for fraudulent misrepresentation where employees complaint alleged inter alia employee was regularly exposed to lead fumes and dust at place of employment employer tested employees blood to monitor lead levels employer willfully and intentionally withheld employees test results which showed employee had developed leadrelated diseases and employer subsequently altered those results to induce employee to continue working for employer employee further alleged employers concealment of employees condition prevented employee from reducing his exposure to lead and obstructed him from receiving appropriate medical treatment and that delay in treatment resulted in aggravation of employees injury E. holding as a matter of law that employer could not reasonably foresee employees boyfriends actions in shooting her even though employee had informed employer two days earlier that he posed a threat

assistant: The best answer is E. holding as a matter of law that employer could not reasonably foresee employees boyfriends actions in shooting her even though employee had informed employer two days earlier that he posed a threat
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Other than consummating the transactions contemplated hereunder, such Purchaser has not directly or indirectly, nor has any Person acting on behalf of or pursuant to any understanding with such Purchaser, executed any purchases or sales, including Short Sales, of the securities of the Company during the period commencing as of the time that such Purchaser first received a term sheet (written or oral) from the Company or any other Person representing the Company setting forth the material terms of the transactions contemplated hereunder and ending immediately prior to the execution hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of a Purchaser that is a multi-managed investment vehicle whereby separate portfolio managers manage separate portions of such Purchaser’s assets and the portfolio managers have no direct knowledge of the investment decisions made by the portfolio managers managing other portions of such Purchaser’s assets, the representation set forth above shall only apply with respect to the portion of assets managed by the portfolio manager that made the investment decision to purchase the Shares covered by this Agreement. Other than to other Persons party to this Agreement and its legal and accounting advisers, such Purchaser has maintained the confidentiality of all disclosures made to it in connection with this transaction (including the existence and terms of this transaction). Notwithstanding the foregoing, for avoidance of doubt, nothing contained herein shall constitute a representation or warranty, or preclude any actions, with respect to the identification of the availability of, or securing of, available shares to borrow in order to effect Short Sales or similar transactions in the future.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No Loan Party shall (a) use the proceeds of any Loan or other Credit Extension hereunder, whether directly or indirectly, and whether immediately, incidentally or ultimately, to purchase or carry margin stock (within the meaning of Regulation U, T or X as promulgated by the Board) or to extend credit to others for the purpose of purchasing or carrying margin stock or to refund indebtedness originally incurred for such purpose or (b) request any Credit Extension or use (or permit the use by any of its Subsidiaries or its or their respective Affiliates, directors, officers, employees or agents of) the proceeds of any Credit Extension, whether directly or indirectly, (i) in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay or authorization of the payment or giving of money, or anything else of value, to any Person in violation of any Anti-Corruption Laws, (ii) for the purpose of funding, financing or facilitating any activities, business or transaction of or with any Sanctioned Person, in any Sanctioned Country or (iii) in any manner that would result in a violation of Anti-Corruption Laws, Anti-Terrorism Laws, Sanctions or other applicable Law.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed original; such counterparts shall together constitute but one agreement. Facsimile and/or digitally transmitted signatures shall be sufficient to bind the Parties and shall in all respects be treated in court proceedings or otherwise as the legal equivalent of an original signature.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: these differences are irrelevant here. 13 . “We may affirm the district court’s decision on any grounds supported by the record.” Collazo v. Nicholson, 535 F.3d 41, 44 (1st Cir.2008) (quoting Estades-Negroni v. Assocs. Corp. of N. Am., 377 F.3d 58, 62 (1st Cir.2004)). 14 . Analogous federal law, which the SJC regards as instructive, see supra section II.B., similarly provides that an episodic condition may nevertheless constitute a disability. See 42 U.S.C. § 12102(4)(D) (“The [ADA's] definition of ‘disability’ ... shall be construed in accordance with the following: ... An impairment that is episodic or in. remission is a disability if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active.”); Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624, 635-36, 118 S.Ct. 2196, 141 L.Ed.2d 540 (1998) (<HOLDING>); School Bd. of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 Options: A. holding that an entity that serves the disabled lacks standing under the ada B. holding that because the plaintiff was not disabled for the purposes of the ada this court need not to address the other elements of the prima facie case C. holding that plaintiffs hernia condition was not sufficient to render her disabled under the ada D. holding that the plaintiff who was under a 40pound lifting restriction was not disabled as defined by the ada and listing five cases from various circuits including our own in which courts have held that weight restrictions alone do not render a plaintiff disabled E. holding that hiv infected plaintiff was disabled under the ada even during the asymptomatic stage of the disease

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that hiv infected plaintiff was disabled under the ada even during the asymptomatic stage of the disease
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As used in this Agreement and unless the context requires a different meaning, capitalized terms used but not defined herein (including the preamble and the recitals hereto) shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Series 2016-1 Supplemental Definitions List attached to the Series 2016-1 Supplement as Annex A or in the Base Indenture Definitions List attached to the Base Indenture as Annex A , as applicable. Unless otherwise specified herein, all Article, Exhibit, Section or Subsection references herein shall refer to Articles, Exhibits, Sections or Subsections of this Agreement.

assistant: Definitions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All of the representations and warranties made by or on behalf of the Borrower, the Guarantors and their respective Subsidiaries in this Agreement and the other Loan Documents or any document or instrument delivered by or on behalf of the Borrower, the Guarantors and their respective Subsidiaries to the Agent or the Lenders pursuant to or in connection with any of such Loan Documents are true and correct in all material respects as of the date made or when deemed to have been made or repeated. All information contained in this Agreement, the other Loan Documents or otherwise furnished in writing (which for the purposes hereof shall include all materials delivered electronically or by email) (other than materials marked drafts and forward-looking information of a general economic nature and general information about the Borrower’s industry) to or made available to the Agent or the Lenders by or on behalf of Borrower or any Guarantor is and will be true and correct in all material respects as of the date furnished when taken as a whole with all other information furnished and does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements contained therein not misleading at such time in light of the circumstances under which such information was provided. The written information, reports and other papers and data with respect to the Borrower, the Guarantors, any Subsidiary or the Unencumbered Properties (other than materials marked drafts and forward-looking information of a general economic nature and general information about the Borrower’s industry) furnished to the Agent or the Lenders by or on behalf of the Borrower, the Guarantors and their respective Subsidiaries in connection with this Agreement or the obtaining of the Commitments of the Lenders hereunder was, at the time so furnished, when taken as a whole with all other information furnished, complete and correct in all material respects, or has been subsequently supplemented by other written information, reports or other papers or data, to the extent necessary to give in all material respects a true and accurate knowledge of the subject matter in all material respects; provided that such representation shall not apply to (a) the accuracy of any appraisal, title commitment, survey, or engineering and environmental reports prepared by third parties or legal conclusions or analysis provided by the Borrower’s or Guarantors’ counsel (although the Borrower has no reason to believe that the Agent and the Lenders may not rely on the accuracy thereof) or (b) budgets, projections and other forward-looking speculative information prepared in good faith by the Borrower (except to the extent the related assumptions were when made manifestly unreasonable).

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “the [IDEA]’s preference for mainstreaming was aimed at preventing schools from segregating handicapped students from the general student body” and that “the school district ha[d] presented no evidence that the [IDEA’S preference for mainstreaming] was meant to restrict parental options when the public schools fail to comply with the requirements of the [IDEA] (emphasis in original)), the district court’s consideration of Lindamood-Bell’s restrictive nature was proper because it considered the restrictive nature only as a factor in determining whether the placement was appropriate under the IDEA, not as a dispositive requirement. M.S., No. 1:05cv1476, 2007 WL 1378545, at *16, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33735, at *49; see also M.S ex rel. S.S. v. Bd. of Educ., 231 F.3d 96, 105 (2d Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). C. Validity of 2005-2006 IEP Finally, we Options: A. recognizing that parents seeking an alternative placement may not be subject to the same mainstreaming requirements as a school board but concluding that the ideas mainstreaming requirement remains a consideration that bears upon a parents choice of an alternative placement and may be considered by the hearing officer in determining whether the placement was appropriate B. holding that protective placement statute unconstitutionally deprived individuals of an automatic periodic reexamination of the need for continued protective placement C. holding that a private alternative placement need not meet the criteria of a fape D. holding that personal jurisdiction can be premised on the placement of a product into the stream of commerce E. holding that placement of a contractual limitations period in a section entitled claims was reasonable

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing that parents seeking an alternative placement may not be subject to the same mainstreaming requirements as a school board but concluding that the ideas mainstreaming requirement remains a consideration that bears upon a parents choice of an alternative placement and may be considered by the hearing officer in determining whether the placement was appropriate
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 2.2 The disclosure of Conﬁdential Information by the Disclosing Party to the Receiving Party shall in no way be construed to imply any transfer of rights connected with the Conﬁdential Information including, without limitation, any trade marks or business secrets.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall have no obligation to provide disability insurance to the Executive. The Company agrees to provide an allowance of up to $15,000 per year, in the aggregate, to reimburse the Executive for (i) the actual cost of premiums incurred by the Executive for disability insurance obtained by the Executive; (ii) the actual cost of premiums incurred by the Executive for any other insurance which would not be available to the Executive under the Company's customary benefit plans; and (iii) the actual cost of leasing and operating an automobile for use by the Executive during the Executive's employment with the Company. The Executive may determine in his reasonable judgment how to allocate the allowance between disability insurance premiums, other insurance premiums and automobile leasing expense.

assistant: Disability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Kekuewa unreliable for the proposition that a defendant who is not given fair notice of the public roads element may ... be convicted of OVUII as a first offense.” Concurrence at 290, 361 P.3d at 1193. To support this assertion, the concurrence relies quite heavily on a quote from Walker stating that the "current essential elements that the State must include in an OVUII charge differ from those required in 2007 at the time of the Ruggiero and Kekuewa decisions.” Concurrence at 287, 361 P.3d at 1192 (quoting Walker, 126 Hawai'i at 490, 273 P.3d at 1176). However, the validity of this statement from Walker is plainly problematic. Generally, a crime or offense is governed by the law existing at the time it was committed. See State v. Martin, 62 Haw. 364, 370, 616 P.2d 193, 197-98 (1980) (<HOLDING>); State v. Tachibana, 67 Haw. 573, 577, 698 Options: A. holding that the commission on remand can set the effective date of a rate to be the effective date of the original commission activity B. holding that when defendants plead not guilty the government is required to prove all elements of charged offenses including intent C. holding that the act applies prospectively to complaints filed after its effective date D. holding that all the elements necessary to prove a crime charged under the hawaii penal code must be shown to have occurred after its effective date E. holding that the creditor must prove the elements of actual fraud

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that all the elements necessary to prove a crime charged under the hawaii penal code must be shown to have occurred after its effective date
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If Participant's employment by the Company or Subsidiary is terminated due to Participant's Disability and the Participant has complied with Section 2 at all times prior to such termination, then all of his or her unvested Restricted Stock Units shall become immediately vested as of the date of such termination.

assistant: Disability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Cir.1992) (upholding Section 1983 claim where plaintiffs complaints concerned the routine use of sexually suggestive language by police officers toward all female officers as well as systemic instances of other forms of sexual harassment), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1644, 123 L.Ed.2d 266 (1993); Auriemma v. Rice, 910 F.2d 1449, 1460 (7th Cir.1990) (in banc) (finding public interest where there was a “wholesale change in the highest police echelons allegedly only on a racial basis”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2796, 115 L.Ed.2d 970 (1991). Here, however, there has been no violation of the First Amendment, because Saulpaugh’s complaints were “personal in nature and generally related to her own situation.” Ezekwo v. NYC Health & Hospitals Corp., 940 F.2d 775, 781 (2d Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 657, 116 Options: A. holding that residents complaints about aspects of residency program that negatively affected her did not implicate matters of public concern B. recognizing a public employees first amendment right to address matters of legitimate public concern C. holding that issues of prison security public safety and official corruption are matters of public concern D. holding that the complaints of a public employee about a reorganization plan were on a matter of public concern even though the employee was primarily motivated by the adverse effect of the plan on himself E. holding in part that complaints focused on individual compensation do not involve a matter of public concern

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that residents complaints about aspects of residency program that negatively affected her did not implicate matters of public concern
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement represents the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the subject matter herein and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements whether written or oral, including any agreements that provide for severance benefits. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement will be binding unless in a writing that specifically references this Section and is signed by duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: relief exact relief sought here. Armstrong I, 924 F.2d at 295. Although Armstrong I did not directly discuss the redressability element of standing, one cannot read Armstrong I and conclude that court did not believe that a private litigant who otherwise had standing would be unable to pursue such relief for lack of redressability. Hi. Visitor Records Are “Federal Records” Under the FRA Defendants’ final argument, made in several different forms, claims that the sought records are presidential records, not agency records, and therefore are covered by the PRA (which allows no private right of action against the Archivist), not the FRA. This Court has already reached the opposite conclusion in this case in relation to plaintiffs FOIA claims. CREW v. DHS, 527 F.Supp.2d 76, 98 (D.D.C.2007) (<HOLDING>). “For purposes of the PRA, presidential Options: A. holding that the visitor records at issue here continue to be agency records for purposes of foia even after they are transferred to the white house or ovp and internally destroyed B. holding that municipal court records were admissible under official records or public documents exception C. holding that records relating to a student court were not education records D. holding that copies of court records only had to be made available in an agency reading room the agency is not required by statute to mail copies of the records nor even to provide a requesterconvenient location for access E. holding that seventeen missing records does not constitute improper record keeping because the fact that the records are not at the station does not mean that the records are incorrect or inaccurate

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the visitor records at issue here continue to be agency records for purposes of foia even after they are transferred to the white house or ovp and internally destroyed
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by operation of law, the remaining terms of this Agreement shall not be affected, provided, however, that if the release in paragraph 4(b) of this Agreement is held invalid, Employer shall have the right to seek rescission of this Agreement.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, the Business Combination Agreement, and the Ancillary Agreements, including any related annexes, exhibits and schedules, as well as any other agreements and documents referred to herein and therein, shall together constitute the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the transactions contemplated hereby and supersede any other agreements, whether written or oral, that may have been made or entered into by or among any of the Parties or any of their respective Affiliates relating to the transactions contemplated hereby.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any term of other provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic and legal substance of the underlying transaction in any country in the Territory is not affected in any manner materially adverse to either Party. Upon such determination that (i) any term of other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced and (ii) the economic or legal substance of the underlying transaction in any country in the Territory is affected in a manner materially adverse to either Party, the Parties shall modify this Agreement, with respect to such country in the Territory, so as to effect the original intent of the Parties as closely as possible in a mutually acceptable manner to the fullest extent permitted by Legal Requirements in such country in the Territory in order that the underlying transaction be completed as originally contemplated to the fullest extent possible.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Seller, the Company and Buyer shall take all reasonable actions necessary to obtain, without the necessity of commencing litigation, and shall cooperate with each other in obtaining, any consent, authorization, order or approval of, or any exemption by, any Governmental Entity or other public or private third party required to be obtained by Sellers, the Company or Buyer in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby. In the event that any notice, consent, or other approval or communication identified on Schedule 1.5(b)(viii) has not been delivered or obtained, as applicable, as of the Closing, and the Buyer proceeds with the Closing in any event, then (i) Buyer shall be deemed to have waived the obligation of the Sellers and the Company to deliver such notice, consent or other approval or communication, (ii) the Sellers and the Company will not be in violation of any covenants or obligations pursuant to this Agreement in connection with their failure to deliver such notice, consent, or other approval or communication.

assistant: Consents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement is the result of negotiations among, and has been reviewed by counsel to Credit Parties, Agent, each Lender and other parties hereto, and is the product of all such parties. Accordingly, this Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall not be construed against the Lenders or Agent merely because of Agent’s or Lenders’ involvement in the preparation of such documents and agreements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, each of the parties hereto has had the advice of counsel with respect to Sections 8.18 , 8.19 , and 8.20 .

assistant: Interpretations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of action refers to the knowledge and diligence of the injured person or to the knowledge and diligence of a legal representative who has accepted responsibility for the injur 5 A.2d 167, 169 (1950) (permitting an action for payments under a contract ten years after alleged incompetence began, where plaintiff had not recovered from disability at the time the complaint was filed); Unkert v. Gen. Motors Corp., 301 N.J.Super. 583, 694 A.2d 306, 311 (1997) (concluding that appointment of guardian for person rendered incompetent in accident does not end period of incompetence for that individual, and that the limitations period therefore does not begin to run upon appointment of a guardian); Henry ex rel. Henry v. City of New York, 94 N.Y.2d 275, 702 N.Y.S.2d 580, 724 N.E.2d 372, 373 (1999) (<HOLDING>); Costello v. N. Shore Univ. Hosp. Ctr. for Options: A. holding that parents were not entitled to use infancy tolling provisions and that the statute of limitations barred their claims B. holding that appointment of guardian over incompetent adult does not remove legal disability so as to halt tolling and commence running of statute of limitations C. holding that because purpose of tolling statute is to remedy problem of locating a nonresident defendant before expiration of statute of limitations tolling statute does not apply to adverse possession action because of statutory scheme allowing for service by publication on parties outside state in such actions D. holding that washingtons statute tolls the statute of limitations for a legally incompetent person notwithstanding the appointment of a guardian this is so because the right to the tolling statute vests in the incompetent person not in the guardian from this premise it follows that the guardians subsequent actions on the incompetent persons behalf should have no additional effect upon the statute of limitations unless they result in res judicata E. holding that new yorks statute tolling statute of limitations during a period when a person is under a disability because of infancy is not terminated by acts of guardian or legal representative in taking steps to pursue claims on infants behalf

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that new yorks statute tolling statute of limitations during a period when a person is under a disability because of infancy is not terminated by acts of guardian or legal representative in taking steps to pursue claims on infants behalf
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: notice does not contravene such a requirement if the insured offers a valid justification for the delay. See id. (“Because [the insured] provides no other reasonable explanation for the four-month delay at issue, the evidence establishes, as a matter of law, that it violated the provision of the policies requiring that ... [notice] be immediately [given] to [the insurer].”). An insured bears the burden of establishing a justification for the delay. See Kay-Lex Co. v. Essex Ins. Co., 286 Ga.App. 484, 649 S.E.2d 602, 606 (2007). Here, Longleaf did not notify QBE of the damage caused by the hailstorm until nine months after the storm. Absent a reasonable explanation, this delay clearly violated the “prompt notice” requirement in Longleafs policy. See Advocate Networks, 674 S.E.2d at 619 (<HOLDING>); Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. J.B. Forrest & Sons, Options: A. holding that notice requirement for malfunctioning vehicles innocuous as it is violated the commerce clause B. holding that actual notice fulfills a notice requirement that an applicable federal regulation be conspicuously posted because actual notice is the best notice C. holding that the filing of notice without motion is insufficient D. holding that a notice recommending termination of an employee to the board without notice to the employee of employees right to attend and dispute the claims violated due process E. holding that a fourmonth delay without justification violated the policys notice requirement

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a fourmonth delay without justification violated the policys notice requirement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within the State of New Jersey. Use of the masculine or feminine genders includes, as applicable, the neuter gender.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: strong protection because it concerns “areas of Art. II duties [in which] the courts have traditionally shown the utmost deference to Presidential responsibilities.” 418 U.S. 683, 710, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974). The Nixon Court went on to recognize that, to the extent an executive claim of privilege “relates to the effective discharge of a President’s powers, it is constitutionally based.” Id. at 711, 94 S.Ct. 3090. Significantly, the Executive’s constitutional authority is at its broadest in the realm of military and foreign affairs. The Court accordingly has indicated that the judiciary’s role as a check on presidential action in foreign affairs is limited. See, e.g., Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, 543 U.S. 335, 348, 125 S.Ct. 694, 160 L.Ed.2d 708 (2005) (<HOLDING>); Chi. & S. Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Options: A. holding that 1 our decision in timken addressed commerces interpretation of section 167735 and 2 we give commerce substantial deference in its administration of the statute because of the foreign policy implications of a dumping determination B. holding state buy american statute unconstitutional because it interfered with federal foreign affairs power emphasizing its effect on foreign commerce C. recognizing strong need for a healthy deference to legislative and executive judgments in the area of military affairs D. recognizing judiciarys customary policy of deference to the president in matters of foreign affairs E. holding that a domestic plaintiffs choice of forum is entitled to more deference than a foreign plaintiffs

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing judiciarys customary policy of deference to the president in matters of foreign affairs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any court of competent jurisdiction holds that any term or provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, the remaining terms and provisions will continue in full force and effect, and this Agreement shall be deemed to be amended automatically to exclude the offending provision.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Committee has caused the Company to set aside a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock for issuance to Grantee hereunder, assuming the maximum number of Vested Shares issuable hereunder, based on Performance, will be issued on the Vesting Date. Any such reserved shares that do not vest in accordance with the terms of this Agreement shall be automatically forfeited and returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares under the Plan. If the status of Grantee as an Employee under the Plan shall terminate for any reason other than as contemplated in clauses a, b, c and d of the definition of Vesting Date or otherwise as agreed in writing between the Company and Grantee, the then-unvested portion of the Award shall immediately terminate and be forfeited by Grantee without the payment of any consideration by the Company, and neither Grantee nor any of Grantee’s successors, heirs, assigns or legal representatives shall thereafter have any further rights or interest in the Award or underlying shares or other benefits so forfeited or any certificates evidencing the same.

assistant: Forfeitures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: court’s suppression ruling on any ground made manifest by the record). Hornbecker and the government agree that Rugen detained Hornbecker between 8:02 p.m. and 8:11 p.m., and that the lawfulness of the detention is appropriately analyzed under the Terry line of cases. Hornbecker and the government also concur that, because most of the period between Rugen’s request for the Volkswagen’s papers and his completion of the written warning was attributable to Horn-becker’s initial inability to locate the papers, whether Rugen lawfully detained Hornbecker during this period essentially depends on whether Rugen’s request to inspect the papers was objectively reasonable under the circumstances. See, e.g., Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 695-697, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) (<HOLDING>). Citing interests in regulating motor vehicles Options: A. holding that a defendants response to even an invalid arrest or terry stop may constitute independent grounds for arrest B. recognizing that the lawfulness of a detention whether a terry stop or a full custodial arrest is determined by a factspecific application of a legal standard designed to help courts assess whether the police action was objectively reasonable C. holding that flight from police can help establish reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop D. holding a fourth amendment terry detention is not a custodial arrest and the use of handcuffs does not automatically convert a temporary detention into a fourth amendment arrest E. recognizing that the inquiry into whether the facts adequately supported a terry stop is informed by the nature and quality of the intrusion

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that the lawfulness of a detention whether a terry stop or a full custodial arrest is determined by a factspecific application of a legal standard designed to help courts assess whether the police action was objectively reasonable
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Any Business Partner shall maintain the material as confidential and shall not publish, disclose or distribute all or any portion of it (or any copies of it) to any other person or permit any other person access to it, save for employees, consultants or agents of the Business Partner for purposes specifically related to Mandarin’s use of the material.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that he was subjected to selective enforcement in violation of his Equal Protection rights, his conviction will be invalid. United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171, 174 (3d Cir.1973) (“[A]ny ‘systematic discrimination’ in enforcement ..., or ‘unjust and illegal discrimination between persons in similar circumstances,’ ... violates the equal protection clause and renders the prosecution invalid.”). Because a successful claim of selective enforcement under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause would have necessarily invalidated Gibson’s conviction, under the Heck deferred accrual rule the statute of limitations did not begin to run until his senr tence was vacated and this claim is not untimely. See Kramer v. Village of North Fond du Lac, 384 F.3d 856, 862 (7th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); Portley-El v. Brill, 288 F.3d 1063, 1067 (8th Options: A. holding the sixth amendment right to a jury trial applies to the states through the fourteenth amendment B. recognizing that the heck deferred accrual rule applies to fourteenth amendment equal protection claims C. holding that fourteenth amendment only applies to state action D. holding that the fourteenth amendment only applies to state action E. holding transfer eligibility rule did not deny the student equal protection of the laws or procedural or substantive due process under the fourteenth amendment

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that the heck deferred accrual rule applies to fourteenth amendment equal protection claims
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of common law claims in large part because the “opinion in Cole is limited at vital points to statutory rights.” 257 F.3d at 824-26. In LaPrade v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc., 246 F.3d 702 (D.C. Cir. 2001), the Circuit Court, in the course of upholding an arbitration award requiring an employee “to pay a portion of the forum fees for arbitration of her statutory and non-statutory claims against her former employer,” 246 F.3d at 704, indicated that non-federal statutory claims were beyond the purview of Cole’s per se rule. See id. at 708; see also Nelson, 215 F.Supp.2d at 156-57. And even when a plaintiff has asserted federal statutory claims, courts in this jurisdiction, post-Green Tree, have been reluctant to apply Cole’s per se rule. See, e.g., Shatteen, 113 F.Supp.3d at 182 & n.3 (<HOLDING>); Toledano, 501 F.Supp.2d at 148 (recognizing Options: A. recognizing the shaky ground on which coles per se rule now rests and refusing to apply it in the context of an employees claim under the family medical leave act of 1993 B. holding that the per se rule does not apply to a vertical agreement between a buyer and supplier and noting that precedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors C. holding that constructive amendments which are per se reversible under harmless error analysis are also per se reversible under plain error analysis D. holding only that a particular ancillary restraint did not constitute a per se violation of the sherman act and remanding for a determination of the case under a rule of reason analysis E. holding that per se statutory rule is not permissible under fourth amendment

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing the shaky ground on which coles per se rule now rests and refusing to apply it in the context of an employees claim under the family medical leave act of 1993
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If the Optionee's employment is terminated for any reason other than Cause (as defined below), death or Disability (defined below), then the Options shall immediately vest notwithstanding the termination of Optionee’s employment in accordance with paragraph 2(a), above. If the Company terminates the Optionee's employment or service for Cause, then the Optionee may at any time within ninety (90) days after the effective date of termination of employment or service exercise the vested portion of the Option to the extent that the Optionee was entitled to exercise the Option at the date of termination.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This 2016-2 Servicing Supplement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you are not allowed to receive products , including services or software , from the united states , for example if you are located in a country embargoed by the united states or if you are on the u.s. treasury department 's list of specially designated nationals ;

assistant: None