flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 548 U.S. 30, 126 S.Ct. 2422, 165 L.Ed.2d 323 (2006). We found that this was a substantive rather than a merely procedural change. Id. We determined “that the elimination of a substantive defense, without more, attaches new legal consequences to events completed prior to enactment that would give rise to liability under the new statute.” Id. (internal punctuation omitted). Four other circuits have reached the same conclusion. Valdez-Sanchez v. Gonzales, 485 F.3d 1084, 1090-91 (10th Cir.2007) (“[W]hen application of IIRIRA § 241(a)(5) disturbs an alien’s substantive rights or expectations, such as the substantive relief available to the Petitioner in this case, DHS may not apply it retroactively.”); Faiz-Mohammad v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 799, 810 (7th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>); Cisneros v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 381 F.3d 1277, Options: A. holding that a claimants failure to list an impairment either in her application for disability benefits or through her testimony disposes of the claim because the alj was under no obligation to investigate a claim not presented at the time of the application for benefits and not offered at the hearing as a basis for disability B. holding imposition of new legal liabilities for past conduct was retroactive C. holding evidence of a 13 permanent partial disability insufficient to establish disability for purposes of ada D. holding iiriras denial of ability to apply for relief created a new disability and was impermissibly retroactive E. holding iiriras preclusion of application for relief constitutes a new disability and is impermissibly retroactive

assistant: The best answer is E. holding iiriras preclusion of application for relief constitutes a new disability and is impermissibly retroactive
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Terms used in this Form of Terms that are defined in the Plan will have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. The Long Term Incentive Program Document (the “LTI Program Document”), an administrative document adopted by the Committee which is set forth at https:/mysource.southernco.com, contains additional provisions that apply to Performance Share Awards. Performance Share Awards are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and any other administrative documents adopted by the Committee from time to time. If there is any inconsistency between the terms herein and the terms of the Plan or any administrative document adopted by the Committee, the Plan’s terms and the administrative document’s terms will supersede and replace the conflicting terms of this Form of Terms.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Seller has all necessary power and authority to execute, deliver and perform this Agreement and to consummate the transactions provided for herein. This Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Seller and constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Seller enforceable in accordance with its terms. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Seller does not and will not violate any provision of any law, regulation or order, or conflict with or result in the breach of, or constitute a default under, any material agreement or instrument to which the Seller is a party or by which the Seller may be bound or affected.

assistant: Authority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of Rule 41(d) would not usually demand suppression, but that here it did: “ ‘[TJechnicaF violations of Rule 41(d) require suppression only if there was a ‘deliberate disregard of the rule’ or if the defendant was prejudiced. . . . Suppression is justified here because the violation was deliberate.” Gantt, 194 F.3d at 994 (emphasis added) (citing United States v. Negrete-Gonzales, 966 F.2d 1277, 1283 (9th Cir. 1992)). See also United States v. Johnson, 660 F.2d 749, 753 (9th Cir. 1981) (“prejudice” in this context means the search would otherwise not have occurred or would have been less intrusive absent the error), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 912 (1982). Aase also argues that the Gantt holding is based on the Fourth Amendment and requires suppression here. But th 307, 79 P.3d 478 (2003) (<HOLDING>). United States v. Gantt, 194 F.3d 987 (9th Options: A. holding that search of defendants purse which he carried was authorized by a warrant to search his person B. holding that a consent to search that is given only after an official falsely asserts possession of a search warrant is unconstitutional C. holding that search of shoulder bag was not authorized by search warrant for apartment D. holding that search was unconstitutional and declining to apply prejudice standard where judge reportedly approved search telephonically but no written warrant was ever issued E. holding that search of backpack constituted a search of defendants person and was not authorized by search warrant for premises

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that search was unconstitutional and declining to apply prejudice standard where judge reportedly approved search telephonically but no written warrant was ever issued
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The express representations and warranties of Seller made in this Agreement shall not merge into any instrument or conveyance delivered at the Closing; provided , however , that any action, suit or proceeding with respect to the truth, accuracy or completeness of such representations and warranties shall be commenced, if at all, on or before the date which is six (6) months after the date of the Closing and, if not commenced on or before such date, thereafter such representations and warranties shall be void and of no force or effect.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties agree that, except as provided in Section 8.3(c), any and all disputes, claims or controversies arising out of or relating to this Agreement that are not resolved by mutual negotiation shall be submitted to final and binding arbitration before the AAA, or its successor, pursuant to the United States Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. Sec. 1 et seq. Either party may commence the arbitration process called for in this Agreement by filing a written demand for arbitration with the AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules in effect at the time of filing of the demand for arbitration, in Suffolk County in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The parties will cooperate under the AAA and with one another in selecting an arbitrator from the AAA’s panel of neutrals and in scheduling the arbitration proceedings. The parties covenant that they will participate in the arbitration in good faith, and that they will share equally in its costs. The provision of this section, and any award made pursuant to this section, may be enforced by any court of competent jurisdiction, and the party seeking enforcement shall be entitled to an award of all reasonable costs, fees, and expenses, including attorney’s fees, to be paid by the party against whom enforcement is ordered. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the arbitrator(s) shall not have the power to award indirect, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages.

assistant: Arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: which reported a total drawdown of 639,312 tons over the three-year period 2009-2011, for an average of 213,104 annually, which is much closer to the 2010 Dynamic Report than the SEC filings. Id. ¶ 47(g). These two sets of facts are mostly ignored by defendants, who instead train their fire on what they label the “only allegation in this regard,” which is that “some unnamed ‘Henan L & R Dept Staff supposedly said that noncompliance with' Chinese mining regulations would create ‘significant risks, liabilities, and penalties.’ ” Defs.’ Mem. 9 (citing Am. Compl. ¶¶ 29, 30.). Defendants argue that under the test of Novak v. Kasaks, 216 F.3d 300 (2d Cir.2000), this confidential witness is insufficiently identified to support an inference of personal knowledge. See Novak, 216 F.3d at 314 (<HOLDING>). But even if defendants are correct that the Options: A. holding that a fraudulent transfer complaint need only set forth the facts with sufficient particularity to apprise the defendant fairly of the charges made against him B. holding that in the absence of public disclosure the court need not address whether relator was original source of the information C. holding that a person violates 10b and rule 10b5 when he misappropriates confidential information in breach of a duty owed to the source of the information D. holding that fraud claims were wrongfully dismissed for insufficient particularity as they provided sufficient notice of the facts of the alleged misconduct E. holding that confidential sources need not be named provided they are described in the complaint with sufficient particularity to support the probability that a person in the position occupied by the source would possess the information alleged

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that confidential sources need not be named provided they are described in the complaint with sufficient particularity to support the probability that a person in the position occupied by the source would possess the information alleged
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: When the Nonqualified Option becomes Vested, you may exercise the Nonqualified Option in whole or in part, but only with respect to whole Option Shares. To exercise your Nonqualified Option, you must follow provisions of the Award Agreement and any instructions provided to you from time to time by the Company, which will include notice stating the number of Class A Common Shares you have elected to purchase and payment of the Exercise Price for that number of Class A Common Shares.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: other circuit courts of appeal hold that LSC decisions “are subject to the pre-APA requirement that administrative decisions be rationally based_” Id. (citing, among others, Spokane County Legal Services, 614 F.2d at 669 & n. 11). Courts have, often reasoned that this rational basis test is no different than the APA standards for agency review by the courts: that agency decisions be based on substantial evidence and not be arbitrary and capricious. National Clients Council, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp., 617 F.Supp. 480, 485-86 (D.D.C.1985); see also Texas Rural Legal Aid, 940 F.2d at 697 (finding that pre-APA rational basis test is equivalent to the APA’s arbitrary and capricious standard); National Ctr. for Youth Law v. Legal Services Corp., 749 F.Supp. 1013, 1016 (N.D.Cal.1990) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, this court will look to the APA Options: A. holding that court may set aside lsc decisions that are arbitrary and capricious or are not based on substantial evidence B. holding an authority ruling may only be set aside if arbitrary capricious an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law C. holding that an agencys decision is to be set aside only if it is arbitrary capricious an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law D. recognizing a nonstatutory basis for setting aside an arbitration award if it is arbitrary and capricious E. holding that bcmr decisions are subject to judicial review by federal courts and can be set aside if they are arbitrary capricious or not based on substantial evidence quoting chappell v wallace 462 us 296 303 103 sct 2362 76 led2d 586 1983 alterations in original

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that court may set aside lsc decisions that are arbitrary and capricious or are not based on substantial evidence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you are granted only a limited right to use the services subject to these terms and no intellectual property rights are or will deemed to be transferred or licensed to you except as contemplated herein .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: By execution below, each Originator expressly acknowledges and agrees that all of the Buyer’s rights, title, and interests in, to, and under this Agreement (but not its obligations), shall be assigned by the Buyer to the Administrative Agent (for the benefit of the Lenders) pursuant to the Receivables Financing Agreement, and each Originator consents to such assignment. Each of the parties hereto acknowledges and agrees that the Lenders and the Administrative Agent are third-party beneficiaries of the rights of the Buyer arising hereunder and under the other Transaction Documents to which any Originator is a party, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or in any other Transaction Document, during the occurrence and continuation of an Event of Default under the Receivables Financing Agreement, the Administrative Agent, and not the Buyer, shall have the sole right to exercise all such rights and related remedies.

assistant: Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Amendments, variations, modifications or changes herein may be made effective and binding upon the parties by, and only by, the setting forth of same in a document duly executed by the General Partner and the Advisor Sub, and any alleged amendment, variation, modification or change herein which is not so documented shall not be effective as to any party.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: You agree to use confidential information gained during employment or engagement with Unum for the benefit of Unum only and, without the prior written consent of Unum, you agree not to divulge, reveal or communicate any confidential information to anyone, and not to use any confidential information for your own or anyone else’s benefit, other than as required by law or legal process.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: as indicated by the emails. At the very least, it is a question for the jury. Id. at 634. Similarly, the fact that CSFB continued to publish bullish projections and include optimistic assessments of AOI/s financial position is akin to a statement that the reader need not worry much about the generic risk disclosures that appeared from time to time. 18 . Market efficiency is not, however, an appropriate inquiry for a motion to dismiss. See, e.g., DeMarco, 318 F.Supp.2d at 120-21. 19 . The applicability of the presumption has been viewed differently by courts, depending on whether a case is at the motion to dismiss stage or class certification stage, because Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(a) requires more of plaintiff than is necessary to surpass 12(b)(6). Cf. DeMarco, 309 F.Supp.2d at 635-36 (<HOLDING>); DeMarco, 222 F.R.D. at 247 (Requiring Options: A. recognizing presumption B. holding that presumption is applicable in motion to dismiss context C. holding that a motion to dismiss based on a forumselection clause should be treated as a rule 12b3 motion to dismiss for improper venue D. holding that party sought affirmative relief by filing motion to dismiss and violated dueorderofhearing requirement by having motion to dismiss and motion to reconsider dismissal heard before special appearance E. holding that the penalty is applicable

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that presumption is applicable in motion to dismiss context
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Pursuant to the Agent Fee Letter, the Administrative Agent shall be entitled to payment for its services in accordance with Article II hereof. The Administrative Agent will not make any changes to the Fees owing to it or amend, restate, supplement or otherwise modify the Agent Fee Letter without the prior written approval of the Lenders.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise provided in Section 4 hereof (relating to a Separation From Service (as defined in the Boston Scientific Corporation Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, as may be amended from time to time (the “Director Deferred Compensation Plan”)) and Section 5 hereof (relating to a Change in Control of the Company), the Stock Option awarded hereunder shall vest in full on the last day of the Participant’s current term as a non-employee director of the Company and have a term of ten (10) years from %%OPTION_DATE,’Month DD, YYYY%-% until %%EXPIRE_DATE_PERIOD1,’Month DD, YYYY%-% (the “Expiration Date”). If the Expiration Date falls on a date on which the New York Stock Exchange is closed for trading, the Expiration Date shall be the trading day immediately prior to the Expiration Date.

assistant: Vesting
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, together with the PIIA, the Amended and Restated 2015 Stock Plan and the Stock Option Agreement, will constitute the entire agreement of the parties with regard to the subject matter hereof, and will contain all the covenants, promises, representations, warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to employment of Executive by the Company. Without limiting the scope of the preceding sentence, all understandings and agreements preceding the date of execution of this Agreement and relating to the subject matter hereof are as of the Effective Date superseded by this Agreement and null and void and of no further force and effect. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing and signed by the party to be charged.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that he described, and conveyed sufficient specificity regarding the van that there was a very low probability that the officers would have stopped the wrong vehicle. Thus, we cannot say the district court’s finding was clearly erroneous. 5 . Because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Burns did not inform the dispatcher why he suspected the van was carrying undocumented aliens, we do not reach the question of whether Healy had reasonable suspicion to stop the van had this information been provided. That said, under similar circumstances, when the informant conveyed the reasons for her suspicions, we have held that reasonable suspicion existed to stop a vehicle. See United States v. Leos-Quijada, 107 F.3d 786, 788-89, 794 (10th Cir.1997) Options: A. holding that officer had reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle when confidential informant personally observed the vehicle provided a description of the vehicle and its direction detailed the basis for her suspicion that the vehicle was engaged in illegal activity and had previously given reliable information that led to the successful apprehension of individuals engaged in various criminal activity B. holding that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle solely because the vehicle drove onto a lot after hours and then left in a hurry C. holding that the stop of defendants vehicle was unlawful where officers stopped the vehicle to check the license and registration but had observed no suspicious activity D. holding that a conclusion that reasonable suspicion supported the stop of a vehicle was subsumed within the trial courts ruling that the officer had probable cause for the stop E. holding reasonable and articulable suspicion existed to support the investigatory stop of a vehicle in view of the time of day and the officers prior knowledge of reports of criminal activity in the area

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that officer had reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle when confidential informant personally observed the vehicle provided a description of the vehicle and its direction detailed the basis for her suspicion that the vehicle was engaged in illegal activity and had previously given reliable information that led to the successful apprehension of individuals engaged in various criminal activity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed in all respects by, the laws of the State of Nevada. The federal and state courts located in Clark County, Nevada shall have sole and exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over this Agreement and the parties expressly consent to personal jurisdiction in Nevada for the purpose of resolving any dispute related to the making or interpretation of this Agreement.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries holds good title to all real property, leases in real property, or other interests in real property (the “ Real Property ”) owned by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (as applicable). Except as set forth in Schedule 2.28, the Real Property is free and clear of all mortgages, defects, claims, liens, pledges, charges, taxes, rights of first refusal, encumbrances, security interests and other encumbrances (collectively “ Encumbrances ”) and is not subject to any rights of way, building use restrictions, exceptions, variances, reservations, or limitations of any nature except for (a) liens for current taxes not yet due and (b) zoning laws and other land use restrictions that do not impair the present or anticipated use of the property subject thereto. In addition, except as set forth on Schedule 2.28, each of the Company and its Subsidiaries holds good and marketable title to all personal property owned by them which is material to the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries, in each case, free and clear of all Encumbrances except such as do not materially affect the value of such property and do not interfere with the use made and proposed to be made of such property by the Company and any of its Subsidiaries. Any Real Property and facilities held under lease by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries are held by them under valid, subsisting and enforceable leases with such exceptions as are not material and do not interfere with the use made and proposed to be made of such property and buildings by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.

assistant: Titles
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: video disks (DVDs). According to the officers, Officer Molinaro discovered a gun in Williams’s waistband during a search of his person after the arrest. It was later determined that Williams had several prior felony convictions, and Williams was indicted under § 922(g)(1) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Williams elected to go to trial. Prior to trial, he stipulated that he was a convicted felon so that the name and nature of his recent prior convictions — a 1991 conviction for possession with intent to distribute heroin, a 1995 conviction for possession with intent to distribute heroin and cocaine, and a 1995 handgun conviction— would not be introduced to the jury. See Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 185, 117 S.Ct. 644, 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997) (<HOLDING>). The prosecution called Officers Molinaro and Options: A. holding that a prior nonarizona conviction to be used as a prior felony conviction under the statute must both be for an offense that would constitute a felony in arizona and be classified as a felony in the other jurisdiction B. holding that a defendants denial of a conviction may be contradicted by introducing public records which prove such a conviction C. holding that fedrevid 403 prohibits the government from introducing the name or nature of a prior felony conviction in a 922g1 case when such information would tend to lure a juror into a sequence of bad character reasoning regarding a defendant who had stipulated to his felon status D. holding that prior indiana felony was conviction for purposes of defendants 922g1 prosecution and noting that although state law determines whether there is a predicate statelaw conviction once the conviction is established federal law dictates that the convicted felon may not possess any firearm E. holding that where defendant stipulates to prior felony conviction evidence of the nature of the prior crime is irrelevant and should be excluded

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that fedrevid 403 prohibits the government from introducing the name or nature of a prior felony conviction in a 922g1 case when such information would tend to lure a juror into a sequence of bad character reasoning regarding a defendant who had stipulated to his felon status
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “adopted only after the hazards posed by track conditions were taken into account.” Id. at 674, 113 S.Ct. 1732. As a consequence, the Court held that under the preemption provision of the FRSA, states were precluded from enacting additional regulations which set the maximum speed at a lower level than that set by the FRSA. Id. Numerous decisions following Easterwood, including claims brought by railroad employees under FELA alleging negligence in unsafe train speed, found such claims to be preempted by the FRSA. See, e.g., Waymire v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co., 218 F.3d 773 (7th Cir.2000); In re Amtrak “Sunset Ltd.'' Train Crash, 188 F.Supp.2d at 1346; Thirkill v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 950 F.Supp. at 1107; Earwood v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., 845 F.Supp. 880, 887-88 (N.D.Ga.1993) (<HOLDING>). Although no authority has been cited by Options: A. holding that a master conspiracy with subschemes to sell speed was a single conspiracy B. holding that the old common law duty to moderate train speed at an extra or ultrahazardous crossing is preempted C. holding the state law claims were not preempted D. holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law E. holding that excessive speed claims are preempted but refusing to hold that easterwood extends to any state regulation affecting speed of trains in any manner

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that excessive speed claims are preempted but refusing to hold that easterwood extends to any state regulation affecting speed of trains in any manner
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall, by 9:00 a.m. (New York City time) on the third (3 rd ) Trading Day immediately following the Closing Date, issue a press release disclosing the material terms of the transactions contemplated hereby, and shall file a Current Report on Form 8-K including the Transaction Documents as exhibits thereto within the time period proscribed by the Exchange Act. From and after the issuance of such press release and Form 8-K, the Company represents to the Purchasers that it shall have publicly disclosed all material, non-public information delivered to any of the Purchasers by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents. The Company and each Purchaser shall consult with each other in issuing any other press releases with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby, and neither the Company nor any Purchaser shall issue any such press release nor otherwise make any such public statement without the prior consent of the Company, with respect to any press release of any Purchaser, or without the prior consent of each Purchaser, with respect to any press release of the Company, which consent shall not unreasonably be withheld or delayed, except if such disclosure is required by law, in which case the disclosing party shall promptly provide the other party with prior notice of such public statement or communication. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall not publicly disclose the name of any Purchaser, or include the name of any Purchaser in any filing with the Commission or any regulatory agency or Trading Market unless the name of such Purchaser is already included in the body of the Transaction Documents, without the prior written consent of such Purchaser, except: (a) as required by federal securities law in connection with the filing of final Transaction Documents with the Commission and (b) to the extent such disclosure is required by law or Trading Market regulations, in which case the Company shall provide the Purchasers with prior notice of such disclosure permitted under this clause (b).

assistant: Publicity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Maintain insurance with financially sound and reputable insurance companies against at least such risks and in at least such amounts as are customarily maintained by similar businesses and as may be required by Applicable Law and deliver to the Lender upon its request information in reasonable detail as to the insurance then in effect. All such insurance shall, (a) provide that no cancellation or material modification thereof shall be effective until at least 30 days (or 10 days for non-payment of premiums) after receipt by the Lender of written notice thereof, (b) name the Lender as an additional insured party thereunder and (c) in the case of each casualty insurance policy, name the Lender as lender’s loss payee. The Lender agrees that the insurance maintained by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of the Closing Date is acceptable.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: who congregate each night at this particular dance hall are not members of any organized association; they are patrons of the same business establishment. Most are strangers to one another, and the dance hall admits all who are willing to pay the admission fee. There is no suggestion that these patrons “take positions on public questions” or perform any of the other similar activities described in [cases addressing expressive association]. Stanglin, 490 U.S. at 24-25, 109 S.Ct. 1591. Here, the plaintiffs contend that they were engaging in both the recreational viewing of a sports event, and the expression of their views on the importance of baseball, and the virtue of their home team. (See James Decl. ¶¶ 3, 6-7; C. Gibbs Decl. ¶¶ 4, 7-8.) In Spence v. Washington, 418 U.S. 405, o 1993) (<HOLDING>). The plaintiffs have not submitted evidence to Options: A. holding that government has more latitude in restricting expressive conduct than in curtailing pure speech B. holding that religious exercise is any exercise of religion whether or not compelled by or central to a system of religious belief and that the use building or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise shall be considered religious exercise C. holding that students action wearing black armbands was expressive conduct entitled to first amendment protection D. holding that unfurling religious banner in stands at world series game constituted expressive conduct E. holding that participating in community service is not expressive conduct

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that unfurling religious banner in stands at world series game constituted expressive conduct
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered personally or when deposited in the United States mail, registered, postage prepaid, and addressed, in the case of the Company, to the Company's Secretary at Federated National Holding Company, 14050 N.W. 14 th Street, Suite 180, Sunrise, Florida 33323, or if the Company should move its principal office, to such principal office, and, in the case of the Recipient, to the Recipient's last permanent address as shown on the Company's records, subject to the right of either party to designate some other address at any time hereafter in a notice satisfying the requirements of this Section.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Id. (internal emphasis, quotation marks, and citation omitted). It is not sufficient for a defendant to allege merely that severance would have improved his chances for acquittal. See id. Vas’ argument on appeal falls far short of showing the required prejudice. He argues generally that “[h]earing about the alleged wide-ranging lawlessness involved in the execution of both the real estate scheme and the separate and different campaign scheme, likely led the jury to brand the defendants as individuals with entrenched criminal propensities....” Appellant’s Br. at 56-57. Contrary to this argument, however, most if not all of the evidence related to the straw-donor count would have been admissible to show Vas’ motive with respect to the property-flip scheme. See Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 569 (<HOLDING>). Moreover, the District Court gave a careful Options: A. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for severance where the allegedly prejudicial evidence would have been admissible in separate trials B. holding that even in separate trial other crimes evidence would not have been admissible and identification testimony would have been admissible C. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence where the evidence would serve only to impeach testimony D. holding that the district court did not err by concluding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance motion to withdraw and motion for reconsideration and rehearing E. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to amend complaint because the proposed amendment would have been futile

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for severance where the allegedly prejudicial evidence would have been admissible in separate trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notices or communications required in this Note or permitted to be given shall be in writing and delivered personally, by a recognized courier service, by a recognized overnight delivery service, by facsimile or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, at the applicable address or facsimile number indicated on the signature pages hereto (or such other address as provided by the parties from time to time in accordance with this Section 6.2 ) and any such notice shall be deemed to have been given and received on the day it is personally delivered or delivered by courier or overnight delivery service or sent by facsimile or, if mailed, when actually received. Payment Invoices may be delivered via email to the email address specified from time to time by the Company (or by any other means reasonably calculated to deliver such Payment Invoice); and shall be deemed to have been received one day after the date when so sent.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: we prohibit crawling , scraping , caching or otherwise accessing any content on the service via automated means , including but not limited to , user profiles and photos ( except as may be the result of standard search engine protocols or technologies used by a search engine with instagram 's express consent ) .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to be brought against a beneficiary’s employer when the employer is the plan administrator and thus bears responsibility for, and has control over, the plan itself. See Garren, 114 F.3d at 187. The Seventh Circuit, however, has adopted the position that only the plan as an entity may be sued. Jass v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 88 F.3d 1482, 1491 (7th Cir.1996) (stating that ERISA permits suits to recover benefits “only against the plan as an entity,” and thus suits against non-plan defendants such as medical personnel are not allowed unless liability against such person is established under another part of the statute), quoting Gelardi v. Pertec Computer Corp., 761 F.2d 1323, 1324 (9th Cir.1985) (per curiam); Riordan v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 128 F.3d 549, 551 (7th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). Although the Seventh Circuit has yet to Options: A. holding abuse of discretion review is appropriate when erisa plan grants discretion to the plan administrator B. holding that an employees claim against plan administrator for denied benefits is preempted C. holding that plan administrator of an erisa health plan did not have to anticipate the confusion of a plan participant D. holding that district courts order remanding an erisa benefits determination to a plan administrator was nonfinal and therefore not appealable after the remand to plan administrator plan participant still could appeal the district courts decision that erisa preempted her state law claim and if successful she would be able to pursue punitive damage E. holding that erisa permits suits to recover benefits only against the plan as an entity and thus the beneficiary had erred by suing her exhusbands employer and plan administrator when proper party would have been the benefits plan itself

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that erisa permits suits to recover benefits only against the plan as an entity and thus the beneficiary had erred by suing her exhusbands employer and plan administrator when proper party would have been the benefits plan itself
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties hereto, and shall supersede any other agreements and understandings (written or oral) between Owner and Manager on or prior to the date of this Agreement with respect to the transaction contemplated in this Agreement. No amendment or modification to any terms of this Agreement, waiver of any covenant, obligation, breach or default under this Agreement or termination of this Agreement (other than as expressly provided in this Agreement), shall be valid unless in writing and executed and delivered by the Parties.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party shall be responsible for its own fees and expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation and execution of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby; provided , however, that the Company shall reimburse the Levin Group for its reasonable, documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses (including legal expenses) in an amount not to exceed in the aggregate $25,000.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, including the exhibits and schedules hereto, constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties, and supersedes all other prior negotiations (whether written, verbal or otherwise), with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof, except that the Parties acknowledge that any confidentiality agreement and/or non-disclosure agreement (if any) heretofore executed between the Company and any Consenting Lender shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to deter others from similar conduct.’ ” Rochan, 242 Ill. App. 3d at 797, 610 N.E.2d at 693, quoting Hazelwood v. Illinois Central Gulf R.R., 114 Ill. App. 3d 703, 712, 450 N.E.2d 1199, 1207 (1983). Herman argues that the punitive damages award is not proportional to the compensatory damages awarded each of the Fords. However, we have previously held that the amount of punitive damages awarded does not need to be proportional, especially when a proportional punitive damages award with a small compensatory damages award would do little to deter the particular defendant or others from “engaging in the same reprehensible pattern of conduct in the future.” Tague v. Molitor Motor Co., 139 Ill. App. 3d 313, 318, 487 N.E.2d 436, 439 (1985); see also Deal, 127 Ill. 2d at 204, 537 N.E.2d at 272 (<HOLDING>). Herman also argues that the punitive damages Options: A. holding that an award for punitive damages must be supported by clear unequivocal and convincing evidence B. holding a court may not award punitive damages C. holding that conduct must be beyond the fraud which supported compensatory damages to award punitive damages D. holding that evidence of a defendants financial condition is a prerequisite to an award of punitive damages E. holding that proportionality is not the touchstone for a punitive damages award

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that proportionality is not the touchstone for a punitive damages award
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: the law of the state of california govern our terms and policies , as well as any disputes , whether in court or arbitration , which might arise between masquerade and you , without regard to conflict of law provisions .

assistant: Choice of law
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither the execution, delivery or performance by Client of this Agreement, nor compliance by it with the terms and provisions hereof, (i) will contravene any applicable provision of any material law, statute, rule, regulation, order, writ, injunction or decree of any court or governmental instrumentality, or (ii) will conflict or be inconsistent with or result in any material breach of any of the terms, covenants, conditions or provisions of, or constitute a default under, or result in the creation or imposition of (or the obligation to create or impose) any lien (except pursuant to this Agreement) upon any of the property or assets of Client pursuant to the terms of any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, agreement or other instrument to which Client is a party or by which it or any of its property or assets is bound or to which it may be subject.

assistant: No Conflicts