flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The amended and restated Plan is effective as of January 1, 2019. The rights and benefits of and/or with respect to a Participant whose employment terminated prior to January 1, 2019 shall be determined under the provisions of the Plan in effect when his/her employment terminated.

assistant: Effective Dates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: I agree that I will not make any statement, written or verbal, disparaging the Company in any forum or media, including but not limited to negative references to the Company or its products, packaging, ingredients, services, corporate policies, or current or former officers or employees, customers, suppliers, or business partners or associates. I will not engage in any behavior, take any action or make any statement (including social media posts) that brings me into public disrepute, contempt, scandal or ridicule, or that shocks or offends the community or any group or class thereof, or that reflects unfavorably on the Company. I understand that this Paragraph 6 is not intended to restrict or limit in any way the Protected Rights set forth in Paragraph 7 of this Agreement.

assistant: Non-Disparagement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the parties hereto shall execute and deliver, at the reasonable request of the other party hereto, such additional documents, instruments, conveyances and assurances and take such further actions as such other party may reasonably request to carry out the provisions hereof and give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and other communications made or given pursuant to this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be deemed effectively given upon receipt or, in the case of notices delivered by the Company to you, five (5) days after deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to you at the last address you provided to the Company, or in the case of notices delivered to the Company by you, addressed to the Administrator, care of the Company for the attention of its Secretary at its principal executive office or, in either case, if the receiving party consents in advance, transmitted and received via telecopy or via such other electronic transmission mechanism as may be available to the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may, in its sole discretion, decide to deliver any documents related to participation in the Plan and this award of RSUs by electronic means or to request your consent to participate in the Plan or accept this award of RSUs by electronic means. You hereby consent to receive such documents by electronic delivery and, if requested, to agree to participate in the Plan through an on-line or electronic system established and maintained by the Company or another third party designated by the Company.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to the presen-tence report and had asserted that there were no errors in the report, requested that the trial court impose concurrent sentences. The trial court chose to follow Adult Probation and Parole's recommendation. In contrast to Perez, the presentence report supported the trial court's decision, and the transcript of the sentencing hearing indicates that prior to sentencing the judge had reviewed and considered the information in the presentence report. Therefore, regardless of whether the factors enunciated at the sentencing hearing may have pertained exclusively to the gravity and cireumstances of the offense, the record demonstrates that the trial court considered all of the statutorily prescribed factors. See, eg., State v. Thorkelson, 2004 UT App 9, ¶ 13, 84 P.3d 854 (<HOLDING>). We conclude that the trial court did not Options: A. holding that mandate did not preclude the trial court from considering unconscionability argument on remand because that issue had not been decided by the trial court nor considered by this court in the first appeal B. holding that trial court did not err C. holding that although the trial court did not specifically refer to the factors in utah code section 7684012 the trial court complied with the statute by relying on presentence reports that included the pertinent information D. holding that where the government filed an information identifying the conviction relied upon to enhance defendants sentence and counsel told the court that the defendant did not dispute the conviction the trial judges sentencing ritual here complied with the requirements of 851b E. holding that the information contained in a presentence report is reliable because it is based upon the presentence officers research of the records contact with relevant agencies and the gathering of information which is required to be included in a presentence report

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that although the trial court did not specifically refer to the factors in utah code section 7684012 the trial court complied with the statute by relying on presentence reports that included the pertinent information
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the child services agency, it was the man against whom the action was taken who sought to utilize the prior finding of paternity as a shield, arguing that principles of res judicata would prevent the disestablishment of paternity against one man and the establishment of paternity in another. As explained above, it is axiomatic that principles of res judicata attach only to the parties involved in the initial civil action; other parties, such as the child or another individual, are specifically not precluded by res judicata from subsequent litigation of the paternity issue. This is a universal holding embraced by this Court in syllabus point five of Benjamin P., as quoted above, and reviewing courts of other jurisdictions. See Ruddock v. Ohls, 91 Cal.App.3d 271, 154 Cal.Rptr. 87 (1979) (<HOLDING>); Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Services Options: A. holding that husband who was excluded from paternity of children and could not intervene in a paternity action to obtain custody would be able to bring an independent action per tql B. holding that adjudication of paternity in divorce decree is not binding on the child C. holding that a paternity determination in which the child is not made a party and is not represented by a guardian ad litem is not binding on the child D. holding that although a putative father had standing to bring a paternity action the action could not proceed and the blood tests could not be ordered unless the trial court determined that the paternity action would serve the best interest of the child E. holding that child is not bound by paternity determination in marital dissolution action

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that child is not bound by paternity determination in marital dissolution action
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No proceeds of any Purchase Price payment hereunder will be used (i) for a purpose that violates, or would be inconsistent with, any law, rule or regulation applicable to Originator or (ii) to acquire any security in any transaction which is subject to Section 13 or 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: § 1682 provides in part that any “rule, regulation, or order” issued by a federal agency to effectuate Title IX must be approved by the President in order to become effective. Consistent with this requirement, President Ford signed the Title IX regulations promulgated by HEW in 1975. EIA contends that the 1979 Policy Interpretation, including the Three-Part Test, is invalid because it lacked simüar presidential approval. The district court correctly rejected this contention as meritless. As with the APA’s notice and comment requirements, courts have held that the requirement of presidential approval does not apply to the issuance of interpretive guidelines. See, e.g., Cohen v. Brown Univ., 879 F.Supp. 185, 199 (D.R.I.1995), rev’d in part on other grounds, 101 F.3d 155 (1st Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). EIA’s efforts, moreover, to corral the fuü Options: A. holding that an order which purports to become final upon the happening of an event specified in the order is not a final order and the happening of the event does not operate to render the order final B. holding interpretation may not be inconsistent with regulation C. holding order granting a new trial is not a final appealable order because it does not terminate the action or any of the claims or parties in the action D. holding that where a regulation could not fairly be read to have spoken at all on an issue an agencys proposed interpretation of the regulation as it pertained to that issue was not a reasonable interpretation of the regulation E. holding that the 1979 policy interpretation need not be approved by the president in order to become effective as it is not a rule regulation or order

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the 1979 policy interpretation need not be approved by the president in order to become effective as it is not a rule regulation or order
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that Peter Rodriguez’s conduct negatively affected her ability to work as a CTI sales consultant. See Lee-Crespo, 354 F.3d at 46 (affirming summary judgment for an employer in a hostile environment case where there was no evidence that the conduct caused “an impediment to [the plaintiffs] work performance”). The inappropriate conduct alleged here is similar to conduct which this circuit and others have deemed insufficient to establish a hostile work environment claim. See, e.g., Chamberlin, 915 F.2d at 783 (concluding that it was “highly doubtful” that five sexual advances by a supervisor “could be considered sufficiently severe or pervasive to support a sexual discrimination claim of the hostile environment variety”); Morgan v. Mass. Gen. Hosp., 901 F.2d 186, 192-93 (1st Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>); Burnett v. Tyco Corp., 203 F.3d 980, 984-85 Options: A. holding that conduct was not sufficiently severe or pervasive where over twoweek period a coworker stood behind the plaintiff to create physical contact surreptitiously looked at the plaintiffs genitals in the restroom and engaged in unwanted touching B. holding that a single incident in which a coworker squeezed an employees buttocks was not sufficiently severe or pervasive so as to alter the conditions of the victims employment and create an abusive working environment C. holding that allegations fell short of title vii liability where male plaintiff claimed that male coworker stood behind him and bumped into him while he mopped peeped at him in restroom and asked him to dance at christmas party D. holding that harassing conduct not sufficiently severe and pervasive where conduct would not have affected the work environment of a reasonable person E. holding that homosexual advances by male coworker were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to be actionable

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that conduct was not sufficiently severe or pervasive where over twoweek period a coworker stood behind the plaintiff to create physical contact surreptitiously looked at the plaintiffs genitals in the restroom and engaged in unwanted touching
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (1) Annual Election . Prior to January 1 of each Plan Year, an Employee may elect: (A) to make Before-tax Deposits from his or her Base Compensation that will be earned and paid in such Plan Year, (B) to make Before-tax Deposits from his or her Bonus Compensation that will be earned (or begin to be earned) in such Plan Year, (C) to defer all or a portion of his or her Equity Awards that will be granted in such Plan Year (for this purpose, an Equity Award shall be considered granted when the Parent takes action to approve such grant), and (D) the form and time of distribution of the Account with respect to such Plan Year, as permitted by Section 7.1(b). Such election shall be made as of the times the Committee may prescribe and shall be irrevocable as of December 31 of the year immediately preceding the Plan Year for which such elections are effective.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: A fee of $10,000 (ten thousand US dollars) per month; (ii) Option Grant . Subject to the sole discretion and determination of the Board of directors of Oramed Pharmaceutical Inc (" Oramed ") and/or its compensation committee as applicable and to the terms and provisions of Oramed's Second Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (" Plan "), the Consultant shall be granted during the second quarter of 2017 an option (" Option ") to purchase into 37,152 shares of common stock, par value $0.012 per share, of Oramed (" Shares "). The exercise or “strike” price of the Options shall be the fair market price as of the date of grant of the Options but not less than $6.00. The Options shall vest in 24 consecutive equal installments during the 24 months following March 20, 2017, such that the first installment will be on March 31, 2017. The Consultant undertakes to take all actions and to sign all documents required, at the discretion of the Company, in order to give effect to and enforce the above terms and conditions.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: accordingly , you represent and warrant that : ( i ) you either are the sole and exclusive owner of all member content that you make available on or through the airbnb platform or you have all rights , licenses , consents and releases that are necessary to grant to airbnb the rights in and to such member content , as contemplated under these terms ; and ( ii ) neither the member content nor your posting , uploading , publication , submission or transmittal of the member content or airbnb 's use of the member content ( or any portion thereof ) will infringe , misappropriate or violate a third party 's patent , copyright , trademark , trade secret , moral rights or other proprietary or intellectual property rights , or rights of publicity or privacy , or result in the violation of any applicable law or regulation .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: The employees argued that they could not seek compensation under the WCA because their injuries did not manifest until 780 and 1300 weeks after their employment-based exposure to asbestos. Accordingly, they noted, if the court read the statute to preclude the occupational claims at issue, the WCA’s 300-week time provision essentially granted an employer “full immunity” against all mesothelioma claims. 14 . In Berda v. CBS Inc., 881 F.2d 20, 27 n. 8 (3d Cir.1989), the court stated that “substantially depends” and “inextricably intertwined” were equivalent and interchangeable. 15 . United Steelworkers of Am., AFL-CIO-CLC v. Rawson, 495 U.S. 362, 110 S.Ct. 1904, 109 L.Ed.2d 362 (1990). 16 . See, e.g., Richter v. Merchs. Fast Motor Lines, Inc., 83 F.3d 96, 97 (5th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). In Richter, the court noted that the CBA at Options: A. holding that former employees state law claim of fraud brought against his former employer was preempted by labor management relations act B. holding plaintiffs state law claims of inter alia tortious interference with contract are preempted by section 301 of lmra C. holding that lmra preempted plaintiffs state law claims against employer for sexual harassment slander tortious interference with economic relations conspiracy and intentional infliction of emotional distress D. holding that an employees claim against plan administrator for denied benefits is preempted E. holding employees negligence claim against his employer was preempted by the lmra

assistant: The best answer is E. holding employees negligence claim against his employer was preempted by the lmra
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the interests of and pursue relief on behalf of an alleged victim in a criminal matter). We also conclude that J.W. fails to show the existence of a reasonable expectation that she will be subject to the same order compelling the gynecological examination again. Jason Wilson entered a guilty plea, and J.W. simply does not articulate why it would ever be necessary for the state court to order her to submit to another examination. Additionally, although J.W. maintains that the issues presented in her lawsuit will recur in West Virginia’s criminal justice system and continue to affect other victims of sex crimes, these concerns have no bearing on this case because it was not brought as a class action. Cf. Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 111 n. 11, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975) (<HOLDING>). Further, although J.W. makes note of the Options: A. holding that the claims of the class representative and class members must be based on the same legal or remedial theory B. holding that the mere existence of individualized factual questions with respect to the class representatives claim will not bar class certification C. recognizing a narrow class of cases in which the termination of the class representatives claim for relief does not moot the claims of the class members D. holding that it is error to certify class when named class representatives are not members of the class they purport to represent E. holding that the filing of a class action by a class representative without standing tolls the period of limitations with regard to all asserted members of the class and that the amendment of the complaint by the addition of a class member with standing relates back to the original complaint

assistant: The best answer is C. recognizing a narrow class of cases in which the termination of the class representatives claim for relief does not moot the claims of the class members
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: reason to believe will be seen by others; not to distinguish between an intentional exposure intended to offend the sensibilities of others and an intentional exposure that is not intended to offend the sensibilities of others. All that Peery holds is that intent to be indecent or lewd is an element of indecent exposure, and one does not have this intent where the exposure is accidental. Peery does not hold that exposure intended to be seen by others is not indecent exposure if it is not intended to offend the sensibilities of others. Furthermore, the indecent exposure statute includes only one term referring t penal statute must be strictly construed, that does not justify a court in supplying restrictive language that is not there. See State v. Zacher, 504 N.W.2d 468, 473 (Minn.1993) (<HOLDING>); State v. Soto, 378 N.W.2d 625, 627-28 Options: A. recognizing that when an interpretation upholding the constitutionality of a statute is available to this court it must adopt that construction B. holding an administrative interpretation cannot change the meaning of a statute or control the courts interpretation of it C. holding that the rule of strict construction does not require the court to assign the narrowest possible interpretation to the statute D. holding that the courts in the absence of ambiguity should as a general rule confine themselves to a construction of a statute as written and not attempt under the guise of construction to supply omissions or remedy possible defects in the statute or to insert exceptions not made by the legislature E. holding that if an otherwise acceptable construction of a statute would raise serious constitutional problems and where an alternative interpretation of the statute is fairly possible we are obligated to construe the statute to avoid such problems

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the rule of strict construction does not require the court to assign the narrowest possible interpretation to the statute
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: ■ New York law applicable to the agreement. See All Star Enter., Inc. v. Buchanan, 298 S.W.3d 404, 414 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, no pet.) (noting choice of law provisions are properly considered in minimum-contacts analysis for general jurisdiction); see also Coleman, 83 S.W.3d at 810. ACTIS was a joint venture between DENSO America and a trading company for Toyota in North America. DENSO Japan entered into a “license and technical assistance agreement” with ACTIS, which allowed ACTIS to request technical support from DENSO Japan. DENSO Japan provided no services to ACTIS under the agreement. We conclude neither the nature of these contracts nor the performance thereunder indicate DENSO Japan purposely directed its business activity at Texas. See Reid, 130 S.W.3d at 219 (<HOLDING>). Technical, Manufacturing, Business, and Legal Options: A. holding that jurisdiction existed over nonresident guarantor of debt to texas creditor based only on sending a guaranty agreement to texas and discussing the general pattern of texas cases holding likewise B. holding that jurisdiction existed over nonresident printing customer despite the fact that texas printer solicited the business in alabama and nonresident sent no personnel to texas because nonresident placed additional orders from which it expected to profit sent payments to texas sent and received printing materials to and from texas paid for shipping of printed goods from texas and sent payments to texas the transactions were governed by texas law and substantial part of performance occurred in texas C. holding nonresident defendant did not submit to general jurisdiction of texas courts merely by executing contract with resident D. holding that a texas court had personal jurisdiction over a kansas resident who after objecting to the texas courts jurisdiction filed a motion for attorneys fees E. holding nonresident partnership not subject to personal jurisdiction of texas court although it sold and shipped to texas plaintiff goods that were subject of breach of contract claim

assistant: The best answer is C. holding nonresident defendant did not submit to general jurisdiction of texas courts merely by executing contract with resident
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Following the Exercise Date, each of the parties hereto shall, and shall cause their respective Affiliates to, execute and deliver such additional documents, instruments, conveyances and assurances and take such further actions as may be reasonably required to carry out the provisions hereof and give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including any actions necessary to admit Holdings as a partner of Rhino effective as of the issuance of the Call Option Premium Units). The parties hereto agree that to the extent the issuance of the Rhino GP LLC Interest by Rhino GP would result in a more favorable tax treatment to Holdings, the parties will negotiate in good faith to effectuate an issuance of the Rhino GP LLC Interest rather than a transfer of such interest from Royal.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the Employment Period, Executive shall be eligible to participate in all retirement, compensation and employee benefit plans, practices, policies and programs provided by the Company to the extent applicable generally to other executives of the Company (except severance plans, policies, practices, or programs) subject to the eligibility criteria set forth therein, as such may be amended or terminated from time to time.

assistant: Benefits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: screen violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches; and (3) the public-policy exception to the at-will doctrine should apply. His arguments are not persuasive. Assuming all of Hice’s allegations as true, the city was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Both the city ordinance adopting the personnel handbook and the handbook itself clearly declare that there is no employment contract and that employment is at will. While the personnel handbook contains provisions describing methods for dismissal under certain circumstances and specifying kinds of conduct that could result in being dismissed, it does not contain provisions that an employee will not be discharged except for cause. See Mertyris v. P.A.M. Transp., Inc., 310 Ark. 132, 832 S.W.2d 823 (1992) (<HOLDING>); Gladden v. Arkansas Children’s Hosp., 292 Options: A. recognizing that a clause in an insurance policy was susceptible to a construction in favor of the insured but that such a construction would be unreasonable absurd and produce results never intended or contemplated by the parties B. holding that the pam transport manual lists certain conduct that wifi result in termination but nothing in the manual suggests that the fist is intended to be exhaustive thus it would not only be unreasonable but absurd to interpret the manual as implicitly foreclosing termination for criminal acts and wrongful conduct beyond the seven violations listed in the manual C. holding that a statute cannot be construed in a manner that would lead to an absurd or unreasonable result D. holding that the directors litigating position was not entitled to chevron deference but did warrant skidmore respect on certain issues where the arguments were persuasive and the agencys manual and practice had for some time consistently advanced a reasonable position E. holding that the test for ineffective assistance of counsel in termination cases is generally the same as in criminal proceedings

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the pam transport manual lists certain conduct that wifi result in termination but nothing in the manual suggests that the fist is intended to be exhaustive thus it would not only be unreasonable but absurd to interpret the manual as implicitly foreclosing termination for criminal acts and wrongful conduct beyond the seven violations listed in the manual
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: previously, plaintiffs interests can and should be adequately protected in the state proceeding given the substantial similarity of the state proceeding to the federal one. Thus, this factor also weighs in favor of abstention. g. Vexatious and reactive nature of the federal claim The Supreme Court recognized that the “vexatious or reactive nature of either the federal or the state litigation may influence the decision whether to defer to a parallel state litigation under Colorado River. ” Cone, 460 U.S. at 17, 103 S.Ct. 927. Where courts find bad faith on the part of plaintiff, a stay or dismissal may be warranted “as a means to deter vexatious use of the courts.” Holland, 840 F.Supp. at 1101; see also Baseline Sports, Inc. v. Third Base Sports, 341 F.Supp.2d 605, 611-612 (E.D.Va.2004) (<HOLDING>). In the instant case, Livingston and Winn Options: A. holding that a developers claim for breach of fiduciary duty was actually a contract action properly brought in the court of claims B. holding that district court has no jurisdiction when an action is brought before the first final denial occurs C. holding that plaintiff brought its claim to district court for a vexatious purpose when the claim was a mirror image of the state court action D. holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the purported state law claim for violation of the automatic stay and that any such claim could be brought only in bankruptcy court only E. holding state immune from suit brought in state court

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that plaintiff brought its claim to district court for a vexatious purpose when the claim was a mirror image of the state court action
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and Clark, Coleman, and Coleman’s mother faced charges as a result. Coleman avers that actual malice is suggested by Defendants’ failure to investí- gate further by contacting Special Agent Shaffer, who signed the affidavit of probable- cause, or Special Agent Conrad, who supplied information to Special Agent Shaffer. Coleman’s Brief at 21. However, Coleman again fails to indicate what reason Defendants had to doubt the veracity of the special agents of the OAG who supplied the information. As such, the fact that Defendants did not contact the sources referenced in the affidavit does not constitute evidence that Defendants entertained serious doubts about the truthfulness of the information. See, e.g., St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727, 88 S.Ct. 1323, 20 L.Ed.2d 262 (1968) (<HOLDING>). Finally, Coleman claims that actual malice is Options: A. holding that the affiants statement based upon his belief did not demonstrate the personal knowledge required by fedrcivp 56e B. holding that the affidavit in question did not satisfy the burden of the party moving for summary judgment where affiants eonclusory statement failed to indicate personal knowledge of the circumstances in question and personal knowledge could not be reasonably inferred from the contents of the affidavit C. holding that belated affidavit could be considered where affiants memory was recently refreshed by photographs which he had not been shown during deposition D. holding actual malice was not shown although defendant relied upon a single affidavit as a source without knowledge of the affiants reputation for veracity or lack thereof E. holding that it was an abuse of discretion for the district court at the summary judgment stage to consider information from an affidavit based on inadmissible hearsay rather than the affiants personal knowledge

assistant: The best answer is D. holding actual malice was not shown although defendant relied upon a single affidavit as a source without knowledge of the affiants reputation for veracity or lack thereof
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party hereby waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any right he, she or it may have to a trial by jury in respect of any suit, action or proceeding arising out of this Agreement or any transaction contemplated hereby. Each party ( i ) certifies that no representative, agent or attorney of any other party has represented, expressly or otherwise, that such other party would not, in the event of litigation, seek to enforce the foregoing waiver and ( ii ) acknowledges that he, she or it and the other party hereto have been induced to enter into the Agreement by, among other things, the mutual waivers and certifications in this Section 6(n).

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Spectrum shall make available on a timely basis to Bayer and to its employees, representatives, Affiliates and third party providers (collectively, “ Representatives ”), the information reasonably requested by Bayer to enable Bayer and its Representatives to provide the Services and the Additional Services. Spectrum shall give Bayer and its Representatives reasonable access, during normal business hours and at such other times as are reasonably required and subject to such reasonable restrictions as Spectrum may from time to time prescribe, to Spectrum’s premises to the extent reasonably necessary to enable Bayer and its Representatives to provide the Services and the Additional Services. Bayer shall provide, and shall cause its Affiliates to provide, as appropriate, Spectrum and its Representatives reasonable access, during normal business hours and at such other times as are reasonably required and subject to such reasonable restrictions as Bayer may from time to time prescribe, to Bayer’s Representatives, books, records, offices, and properties directly related to Bayer’s support of the licensed technology and the assets sold to Spectrum and reasonably required to permit Spectrum to develop and provide its own stand-alone services to replace the Services and the Additional Services.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: be considered in light of the particular facts at issue, see Davin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 60 F.3d 1043, 1060 (3d Cir.1995) (opting not to adopt a “per se rule” regarding an individual’s privacy interests). When considering whether disclosure of certain information implicates privacy interests, courts are especially concerned with information that could be considered sensitive, derogatory, or intimate. In particular, both the Supreme Court and the Third Circuit have been highly protective of information that links a private individual to a criminal or national security investigation. See Favish, 541 U.S. at 166, 124 S.Ct. 1570 (concluding that there is “special reason” to protect “intimate personal data” connecting an individual to a criminal investigation); Davin, 60 F.3d at 1060 (<HOLDING>). Courts have also found privacy interests to Options: A. holding that the constitutional protection of an individuals reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her home does not extend to a place of business B. recognizing an individuals privacy interest in not having his or her identity revealed in the context of a criminal or national security investigation C. holding that every citizen has a constitutional right of privacy in his or her medical records D. holding that individuals have no expectation of privacy in their license registration or insurance documents and citing outofstate cases that have held that individuals do not have a privacy interest in their registration records E. holding that an expert can comply with the timing requirement if an experts research even after his or her deposition revealed that the standard of care in his or her community was the same or similar to the standard of care in the community in which he or she is testifying when the injury occurred

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing an individuals privacy interest in not having his or her identity revealed in the context of a criminal or national security investigation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither this Lease nor any provision hereof may be changed, waived, discharged, or terminated except by an instrument in writing signed by all the parties thereto. All the terms and provisions of this Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective permitted successors and assigns. Each term or provision of this Lease to be performed by Tenant shall be construed as an independent covenant and condition. Time is of the essence with respect to the exercise of any rights of Tenant or Landlord under this Lease. In the event of any dispute between the parties concerning this Lease, Landlord shall be entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs in connection with such dispute, including, without limitation, in connection with any suit, action, arbitration, or other proceeding concerning such dispute. Except as otherwise set forth in this Lease, any obligations arising prior to the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease of Tenant (including, without limitation, any monetary, repair, and indemnification obligations) and Landlord shall survive the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease; provided, that each of Landlord and Tenant shall be required to give the other Notice of any such surviving and unsatisfied obligations within one year after the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease. Nothing contained in this Lease shall be construed to create or impose any liabilities or obligations and no such liabilities or obligations shall be imposed on any of the shareholders, beneficial owners, direct or indirect, officers, directors, trustees, employees, or agents of Landlord or Tenant for the payment or performance of the obligations or liabilities of Landlord or Tenant hereunder. Further, in the event Landlord shall be in default under this Lease, and if as a consequence of such default, Tenant shall recover a money judgment against Landlord, then such judgment shall be satisfied only out of the proceeds of sale received upon execution of such judgment against the right, title, and interest of Landlord in the Leased Property.

assistant: Construction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: LEXIS 18171, at 9 (NJD.Cal.) (“[T]he impractica 1979). Similarly, courts interpreting force maj-eure provisions have held that nonperformance dictated by economic hardship is not enough to fall within a force majeure provision. See, e.g., Stand Energy, 760 N.E.2d at 458 (finding that unseasonably hot temperatures resulting in record demand for power and unprecedented high hourly prices for electric power did not excuse, under the force majeure clause, defendant’s inability to deliver the power required under the contract). “[M]ere increase in expense does not excuse performance [under a force majeure provision] unless there exists extreme and unreasonable difficulty, expense, [or] injury.” Butler v. Nepple, 54 Cal.2d 589, 6 Cal.Rptr. 767, 354 P.2d 239, 244-45 (1960) (emphasis added) (<HOLDING>). Defendants, in their Opposition, focus on how Options: A. holding that compliance with oneperson onevote requirement under fourteenth amendment of federal constitution does not excuse compliance with fifteenth amendment of federal constitution B. holding that substantial compliance with notice is sufficient C. holding that anticipated costs of compliance with an injunctive order are not changed circumstances under rufo D. holding that the fact that compliance with the contract would involve greater expense than anticipated due to a steel strike did not excuse performance E. recognizing that the government generally has the right to insist on performance in strict compliance with the contract specifications

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the fact that compliance with the contract would involve greater expense than anticipated due to a steel strike did not excuse performance
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the Term, the Executive shall be eligible to participate in employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements of the Company in accordance with their terms, as in effect from time to time, and as are generally provided by the Company to its senior executive officers but in any event on a no less favorable basis than is provided to any other executive officer of the Company.

assistant: Benefits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All of the Obligor’s obligations under this Article II shall survive the termination of this Agreement, the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all other Obligations and resignation of the Administrative Agent or the Collateral Agent.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: he called the dispatcher for assistance, the occupants had already been handcuffed. And the record provides no indication that the occupants threatened his safety. Moreover, if Reilly had not been concerned that the occupants would discard evidence, he and Horn could have driven the four, two to a car. Instead, he opted to wait for separate transportation, so the suspects could not leave contraband in the patrol car and possibly blame their fellow passengers. Reilly also had an objective reason to believe that Voichahoske was concealing evidence and that given the opportunity, he might destroy it. Reilly already had probable cause to believe Voichahoske was concealing drugs on his person, which, in turn, justified his arrest. See State v. Dussault, 193 Neb. 122, 225 N.W.2d 558 (1975) (<HOLDING>). Because a search of his person was Options: A. holding fourth amendment protects right to be free from arrest without probable cause B. holding invalid warrant did not create probable cause for arrest C. holding that probable cause is a complete defense to an action for false arrest D. holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same E. holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parent Borrower and each of its Restricted Subsidiaries owns, or has the legal right to use, all United States and foreign patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, trade names, copyrights, technology, know-how and processes necessary for each of them to conduct its business as currently conducted (the “ Intellectual Property ”) except for those the failure to own or have such legal right to use would not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Except as provided on Schedule 5.9 , no claim has been asserted and is pending by any Person against the Parent Borrower or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries challenging or questioning the use of any such Intellectual Property or the validity or effectiveness of any such Intellectual Property, nor does the Parent Borrower know of any such claim, and, to the knowledge of the Parent Borrower, the use of such Intellectual Property by the Parent Borrower and its Restricted Subsidiaries does not infringe on the rights of any Person, except for such claims and infringements which in the aggregate, would not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) Neither the Information Memorandum nor any of the other reports, financial statements, certificates or other written information furnished by or on behalf of the Company or any Subsidiary to the Administrative Agent or any Lender in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or delivered hereunder (as modified or supplemented by other information so furnished) contains any material misstatement of fact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not materially misleading; provided that, with respect to projected financial information, the Borrowers represent only that such information was prepared in good faith based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time, it being understood that actual results may vary from such projections and that such variations may be material.

assistant: Disclosures