flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: robbery as theft coupled with bodily injury or threat of imminent bodily injury or death). The record contains no evidence that the events underlying either of Love’s convictions involved violence or theft, or that Love engaged in any conduct during the seven months he was employed at Whataburger that would have made his participation in an aggravated robbery foreseeable. Even viewed in hindsight, Love’s convictions for selling cocaine and nonpayment of child support do not indicate a propensity for violent criminal conduct, like aggravated robbery and murder. Thus, we hold that Love’s own criminal behavior, and that of his cohorts, is a superseding cause that precludes Whata-burger’s liability for these crimes. Compare Fifth Club, Inc. v. Ramirez, 196 S.W.3d 788, 796-97 (Tex.2006) (<HOLDING>), Doe, 907 S.W.2d at 478 (holding that Options: A. holding that employees convictions for burglary possession of controlled substance public intoxication possession of marijuana unlawful carrying of weapon and evading arrest did not make his sexual assault of child foreseeable B. holding written reprimand stating that officer failed to exercise due care and failed to comply with transportation code did not raise fact issue on reckless disregard C. holding that employees failure to comply with requirement in peace officer manual and his reprimand for using profanity to member of public did not make his assault of customer foreseeable D. holding that vulnerability of a peace officer factored into greater liability for fleeing a peace officer resulting in death E. holding that employees deferred adjudication for indecency with child could make sexual assault of customer foreseeable when sales were made in customers homes

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that employees failure to comply with requirement in peace officer manual and his reprimand for using profanity to member of public did not make his assault of customer foreseeable
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: notice to the insurer of the nature of the specific wrongful act, the consequences which have resulted or may result from the wrongful act, and the circumstances by which the insured first became aware thereof. There can be little good faith disagreement that the so-called “notice”— stating only “[t]his is just for notice purposes as this has been discontinued and there are no allegations” (UF No. 11)— inadequately complies with the policy’s requirements of notice of Wrongful Act(s) Granted, the Summons with Notice alleged breach of contract or fiduciary duty, but provided no information regarding the particular acts which led to the lawsuit being filed, the people who committed the acts and when the underlying acts occurred. See F.D.I.C. v. Caplan, 838 F.Supp. 1125, 1130 (W.D.La.1993) (<HOLDING>); see also McCullough v. Fid. and Deposit Co., Options: A. holding that insured informing insurer that it had received a cease and desist order was insufficient notice because it did not detail the particular subsidiary involved the particular agents officers or directors involved the time period during which the events occurred the identity of potential claimants and the specific unsound practices made the basis of the order B. holding that the proper focus when determining the starting point of the limitations period is upon the time of the discriminatory acts not upon the time at which the consequences of the acts became most painful C. holding as to the admissibility of prior bad acts that allegedly took place fourteen and twelve years before the acts alleged in that case that the lapse of time between the defendants sexual acts goes to the weight of the evidence not to its admissibility D. holding notice insufficient because it merely recited the language of the policys notice provision and provided no information regarding the types of practices alleged to constitute wrongful acts the agents officers or directors alleged to be involved in wrongdoing or the time period during which the allegedly wrongful acts took place E. holding that an individual could recover for acts occurring outside the statutory time period if at least one act occurred within the time period and the acts were part of the same hostile work environment

assistant: The best answer is D. holding notice insufficient because it merely recited the language of the policys notice provision and provided no information regarding the types of practices alleged to constitute wrongful acts the agents officers or directors alleged to be involved in wrongdoing or the time period during which the allegedly wrongful acts took place
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Enter into any arrangement, directly or indirectly, with any Person whereby it shall sell or transfer any property, real or personal, used or useful in its business, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, and thereafter rent or lease such property or other property which it intends to use for substantially the same purpose or purposes as the property being sold or transferred.

assistant: Sales
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: crowdtangle does not make any representations , warranties or conditions about the quality , accuracy , security , reliability , completeness , quiet enjoyment , currency , or timeliness of the services .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: City to convey all of the trust property to DePaul, NIU, Loyola, and the Diocese. The amendment directs National City to divide the corpus into separate shares and to “distribute the separate shares to the institutions so indicated.” The amendment provides that “[ejach separate share shall be held as a separate trust or similar permanent endowment fund by the institution so indicated, with the named institution as sole Trustee or fiduciary” (emphasis added). Because the amendment requires National City to convey all of the Scholarship Trust’s property, National City’s fiduciary obligation to such property would therefore terminate upon such a conveyance, and the Scholarship Trust would necessarily cease. See Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Steinitz, 288 Ill. App. 3d 926, 933 (1997) (<HOLDING>). In support of their assertion that the Options: A. holding that trustees fiduciary duty exists independent of any clause in trust agreement B. holding that creditors of a trust beneficiary were prohibited from intervening in an action involving a dispute between the trustee and a beneficiary concerning distribution of the trust corpus C. holding that successor trustee properly applied former trustees undistributed income to satisfy prior judgment for improper distribution of trust corpus D. holding creditors can reach assets of trust to the same extent as the maximum amount that would be payable to the beneficiary in the trustees discretion E. holding that trustees act of conveying entire corpus terminated the trust

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that trustees act of conveying entire corpus terminated the trust
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 4.1 Regular Board meetings are, in the ordinary course of events, not open to the public and/or media. d) If no recordal is made, the matter, discussions and all resolutions should be deemed to be confidential unless declared by the Board by resolution as not confidential.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: actual intent to defraud creditors is proven, the conveyance will be set aside regardless of the adequacy of consideration given.”). Id. The Correcting Opinion attempts to rectify the misstatement of the requirements for a claim under § 276 made in the Kovler 2000 Opinion, but by that time, the proverbial horse had already left the barn. Between the Kovler 2000 Opinion and the issuance of the Correcting Opin ion, the court in Manhattan Inv. Fund had picked up the Kovler decision, stating: Under N.Y.D & CL section 276, a cause of action must allege fraudulent intent on the part of the transferor as well as the transferee. See Sullivan v. Messer (In re Corcoran), 246 B.R. 152, 161 (E.D.N.Y.2000) (emphasis added); Gentry v. Kovler (In re Kovler), 249 B.R. 238, 243 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2000) (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added). “Fraudulent intent on the Options: A. holding that mutual mistake is ground for reformation when as here the minds of the parties have met contractually but because of a mutual mistake the written contract between the parties is wanting in expression or execution to evince the actual and binding contractual intent of the parties B. holding that when a contract is unambiguous the court will enforce the plain meaning of the contract as the intention of the parties C. holding mutual assent in contract law is elementary and it must be expressed by the parties D. holding that both the lack of mutual assent and the indefiniteness of contract terms negate the existence of a contract E. holding that nyd cl requires mutual fraudulent intention on the part of both parties to the transaction

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that nyd cl requires mutual fraudulent intention on the part of both parties to the transaction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Comply, and cause each Designated Subsidiary to comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders, such compliance to include, without limitation, compliance with ERISA and Environmental Laws as provided in Section 5.01(j), if failure to comply with such requirements would have a Material Adverse Effect, and maintain in effect and enforce policies and procedures designed to promote compliance by the Company, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers and employees, in each case, when acting on behalf of the Company or its Subsidiaries in all material respects with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions.

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as herein expressly provided, the respective rights and obligations of the Contractor and the Company under this Agreement shall not be assignable by either party without the written consent of the other party and shall, subject to the foregoing, enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Contractor and the Company and their permitted successors or assigns. Nothing herein expressed or implied is intended to confer on any person other than the parties hereto any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Promptly make, execute, acknowledge and deliver, all such additional instruments and to take such further acts as Secured Party may reasonably request to: (a) protect, maintain and preserve the Collateral and Secured Party’s security interest in the Collateral; and (b) protect, vest in and assure to Secured Party its rights or remedies hereunder and the perfection and priority of its rights herein, including in necessary, without limitation, placing legends on Collateral or on books and records pertaining to Collateral stating that Secured Party has a security interest therein.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Loan Party shall promptly notify the Borrower Representative of the occurrence of any Default or Event of Default hereunder referring to this Agreement describing such Default or Event of Default and stating that such notice is a “notice of default”. In the event that the Borrower Representative receives such a notice, the Borrower Representative shall give notice thereof to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders pursuant to Section 5.02. Any notice provided to the Borrower Representative hereunder shall constitute notice to each Borrower on the date received by the Borrower Representative.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event the Company experiences a Change in Control prior to March 3, 2025, the Shares shall be substituted with an Alternative Award (as defined in the Plan) which shall vest on the earlier of March 3, 2025 or the date the Grantee experiences a “Qualifying Termination” as defined in Section 2(b) above.

assistant: Change In Control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Repurchase Agreement shall remain in effect until the Termination Date. However, no such termination shall affect the Seller’s outstanding obligations to the Buyer at the time of such termination. The Seller’s obligations under Section 3.03 , Section 4.12 , Section 6 , Section 13.04 and Section 13.06 and any other reimbursement or indemnity obligation of the Seller to the Buyer pursuant to this Repurchase Agreement or any other Repurchase Documents shall survive the termination hereof.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Plan Administrator shall perform the duties and exercise the powers and discretion given to him in the Plan document and by applicable law and his decisions and actions shall be final and conclusive as to all persons affected thereby. The Company shall furnish the Plan Administrator with all data and information that the Plan Administrator may reasonably require in order to perform his functions. The Plan Administrator may rely without question upon any such data or information.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: matter for expeditious further development and issuance of a readjudicated decision supported by an adequate statement of reasons or bases, see 38 U.S.C. §§ 101(2) 1310, 7104(a), (d)(1); 38 U.S.C. §§ 5100-5103(a), 5103A, 5106, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.1(d), 3.40, 3.41, 3.159, 3.203; Pelegrini, Charles, and Quartuccio, all supra; Fletcher v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 394, 397 (1991), all consistent with this opinion and in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 7112 (as added by the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003, Pub.L. No. 108-183, § 707(b), 117 Stat. 2651, 2673) (requiring Secretary to “take such actions as may be necessary to provide for the expeditious treatment by the Board of any claim that is remanded to the Secretary by the Court”); see Vargas-Gonzalez v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 222, 225-30 (2001) (<HOLDING>), and in accordance with all applicable law and Options: A. holding that a found in indictment need not allege all of the elements of entry B. holding that freestanding predecessor of section 7112 applies to all elements of claim remanded by the court or board C. holding that vbia 302 applies to all elements of a claim remanded by court or board D. holding that guilty plea admits all elements of offense E. holding that section 302 of veterans benefits improvements act of 1994 publ no 103446 302 108 stat 4645 4658 predecessor of section 7112 applies to all elements of claim remanded by the court or board

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that vbia 302 applies to all elements of a claim remanded by court or board
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THE SELLER, THE GUARANTOR AND THE PURCHASER HEREBY WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE OR DEFEND ANY RIGHTS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, ANY OTHER PURCHASE DOCUMENT OR ANY APPLICATION, INSTRUMENT, DOCUMENT, AMENDMENT OR AGREEMENT DELIVERED OR WHICH MAY IN THE FUTURE BE DELIVERED IN CONNECTION HEREWITH OR THEREWITH OR ARISING FROM ANY BANKING RELATIONSHIP EXISTING IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT AND THE OTHER PURCHASE DOCUMENTS, AND AGREES THAT ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE TRIED BEFORE A COURT AND NOT BEFORE A JURY.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: they expressly state or overwhelmingly imply that KSU waived Eleventh Amendment immunity. To resolve this dispute, we must evaluate whether a state may waive immunity by its affirmative conduct in the context of a federal. program or whether Edelman mandates that a state can waive only by express statements or overwhelming implication in its statutory or constitutional text. See Atascadero, 473 U.S. at 238. n. 1 & 239-40, 105 S.Ct. 3142; Edelman, 415 U.S. at 673, 94 S.Ct. 1347. Several Supreme Court decisions. provide that neither receipt of federal funds, participation in a federal program, nor an agreement to recognize and abide by federal laws, regulations, and guidelines is alone sufficient to waive Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Atascadero, 473 U.S. at 246-47, 105 S.Ct. 3142 (<HOLDING>); Florida Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Options: A. holding that a college received federal funds where the funds were granted to its students as financial aid rather than directly to the college because the language of the section does not distinguish between direct and indirect receipt of federal funds B. holding the requisite connection was met with proof that the city received federal funds for housing and urban development programs and the corrupt payments at issue concerned real estate transactions also without specifying which federal grant provided the jurisdictional basis C. holding that neither mere participation in a federal program nor provision requiring compliance with federal law is sufficient to establish that the state consented to be sued in federal court D. holding that participation in federal programs and receipt of federal funds under such programs fall far short of manifesting a clear intent to waive immunity E. holding that removal to federal court does not waive tribal sovereign immunity

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that participation in federal programs and receipt of federal funds under such programs fall far short of manifesting a clear intent to waive immunity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS REGARDING CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE, JURY TRIAL WAIVER AND JUDICIAL REFERENCE PROVISION SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.9 OR 11.19 OF THE CREDIT AGREEMENT, AND SUCH PROVISIONS ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE, MUTATIS MUTANDIS .

assistant: Venues
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS SECURITY AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS THEREOF, BUT INCLUDING SECTION 5-1401 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties agree that this Agreement shall be construed solely in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, notwithstanding its choice or conflict of law principles, and any proceedings arising among the parties in any matter pertaining or related to this Agreement shall, to the extent permitted by law, be heard solely in the State and/or Federal courts located in Delaware.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower hereby (a) acknowledges the terms of this First Amendment and the Credit Agreement; (b) ratifies and affirms its obligations under, and acknowledges its continued liability under, each Loan Document to which it is a party and agrees that each Loan Document to which it is a party remains in full force and effect as expressly amended hereby; and (c) represents and warrants to the Lenders that, as of the date hereof, after giving effect to the terms of this First Amendment: (i) all of the representations and warranties contained in each Loan Document to which the Borrower is a party are true and correct in all material respects (or, if already qualified by materiality, Material Adverse Effect, or a similar qualification, true and correct in all respects) as of the First Amendment Effective Date (unless any such representation or warranty relates solely to a specific earlier date, in which case, such representation or warranty was true and correct in all material respects (or, if already qualified by materiality, Material Adverse Effect, or a similar qualification, true and correct in all respects) as of such earlier date); (ii) no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing and the Aggregate Revolving Credit Exposures do not, and will not immediately after giving effect to this First Amendment, exceed the Borrowing Base; (iii) since the date of the most recent balance sheet delivered pursuant to Section 8.01(a) of the Credit Agreement, no Material Adverse Effect has occurred; (iv) the execution, delivery and performance by the Borrower of this First Amendment are within Borrower’s corporate powers, have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action, require no consent or approval of, or filing with, any governmental body, agency or official and do not violate any provision of applicable law or any material agreement binding upon Borrower or any other Loan Party; and (v) this First Amendment constitutes the valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as (A) the enforceability thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditor’s rights generally, and (B) the availability of equitable remedies may be limited by equitable principles of general application, regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law.

assistant: Warranties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, together with the Confidentiality Agreement, contains the complete, final and exclusive agreement of the parties relating to the terms and conditions of the Executive’s employment and the termination of the Executive’s employment, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous oral and written employment agreements or arrangements between the parties.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Agent, the Lenders and the Issuing Banks agree to maintain the confidentiality of the Information (as defined below), except that Information may be disclosed (a) to its Affiliates and to its Related Parties (it being understood that the Persons to whom such disclosure is made will be informed of the confidential nature of such Information and instructed to keep such Information confidential); (b) to the extent required or requested by any regulatory authority purporting to have jurisdiction over such Person or its Related Parties (including any self-regulatory authority, such as the National Association of Insurance Commissioners); (c) to the extent required by applicable laws or regulations or by any subpoena or similar legal process; provided that such Person shall, to the extent permitted by law, use its commercially reasonable efforts to promptly inform the Borrower of such disclosure and to ensure that such Information is accorded confidential treatment; (d) to any other party hereto; (e) in connection with the exercise of any remedies hereunder or under any other Loan Document or any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document or the enforcement of rights hereunder or thereunder; (f) subject to an agreement containing provisions substantially the same as those of this Section, to (i) any assignee of or Participant in, or any prospective assignee of or Participant in, any of its rights and obligations under this Agreement, or (ii) any actual or prospective party (or its Related Parties) to any swap, derivative or other transaction under which payments are to be made by reference to the Borrower and its obligations, this Agreement or payments hereunder; (g) on a confidential basis to (i) any rating agency in connection with rating the Borrower or its Subsidiaries or the Facilities or (ii) the CUSIP Service Bureau or any similar agency in connection with the issuance and monitoring of CUSIP numbers with respect to the Facilities; (h) with the consent of the Borrower; (i) in syndication or other marketing materials relating to the Tranche B Loans, or (j) to the extent such Information (x) becomes publicly available other than as a result of a breach of this Section, or (y) becomes available to the Agent, any Lender, any Issuing Bank or any of their respective Affiliates on a nonconfidential basis from a source other than the Borrower.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: There are no actions, suits, proceedings or investigations pending or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, threatened against the Borrower or any Subsidiary of the Borrower at law or in equity before any Official Body which individually or in the aggregate (i) could reasonably be expected to result in any Material Adverse Change or (ii) purports to materially adversely affect the legality, validity or enforceability of this Agreement or any Note or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. Neither the Borrower nor any Subsidiaries of the Borrower is in violation of any order, writ, injunction or any decree of any Official Body which could reasonably be expected to result in any Material Adverse Change.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid pursuant to the terms of the Commitment Letter, dated as of June 7, 2017, among the Company and the other signatories party thereto.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The PSUs and the number of shares of Common Stock issuable for each PSU and the other terms and conditions of the grant evidenced by this Agreement are subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14.2 of the Plan.

assistant: Adjustments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Every notice or other communication relating to this Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between the Company and the Participant shall be in writing, and shall be mailed to or delivered to the party for whom it is intended at such address as may from time to time be designated by such party in a notice mailed or delivered to the other party as herein provided; provided that, unless and until some other address be so designated, all notices or communications by the Participant to the Company shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal executive office, to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, and all notices or communications by the Company to the Participant may be given to the Participant personally or may be mailed to the Participant at the Participant’s last known address, as reflected in the Company’s records. Notwithstanding the above, all notices and communications between the Participant and any third-party plan administrator shall be mailed, delivered, transmitted or sent in accordance with the procedures established by such third-party plan administrator and communicated to the Participant from time to time.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of protecting handicapped individuals from deprivations based on prejudice, stereotypes, or unfounded fear, while giving appropriate weight to such legitimate concerns of grantees as avoiding exposing others to significant health and safety risks. [Id. at 287,107 S.Ct. at 1130-31, 94 L.Ed.2d at 320 (footnote omitted) ]. Arline holds that proof of a classroom teacher’s active tuberculosis is, by itself, insufficient justification for dismissing her. More is required than the fact that she is a member of a class of persons who are potentially dangerous. Particularized proof is needed that this teacher, even with reasonable accommodations for her disability, would be a source of contagion in her specific teaching job. Cf. Marbrunak, Inc. v. City of Stow, Ohio, 974 F.2d 43 (6th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); Potomac Group Home Corp. v. Montgomery Options: A. holding that safety requirements imposed by ordinance only on group homes and which did not relate to the residents disabilities were illegally discriminatory B. holding that residents of a geograph ic area are not a distinct cognizable group and citing united states v test which made clear that a geographic area is not a distinct group for support C. holding petitioner could not deduct real estate taxes imposed on property he did not own because these taxes were not imposed on him D. holding that plaintiffs statistics did not shed any light on the legally relevant issue because they did not indicate the group of applicants who were interviewed or even the group of applicants found qualified or the group of all applicants E. holding that permit fees imposed by statute were not taxes

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that safety requirements imposed by ordinance only on group homes and which did not relate to the residents disabilities were illegally discriminatory
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any information or notices required to be given in writing under this Agreement shall be given personal delivery, by overnight courier service or by certified mail (return receipt requested, postage prepaid), to the address of the respective Party set forth below, or to such other address for either Party as that Party may designate by written notice. Delivery shall be deemed effective upon receipt or failure to accept receipt in the case of personal delivery or delivery by overnight courier and three days following deposit with the United States mail in the case of delivery by certified mail.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: EACH OF THE GUARANTORS AND THE TRUSTEE HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE OTHER TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY AND THEREBY.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The representations and warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement or in any Schedule delivered pursuant hereto shall be true and correct on and as of the Closing Date with the same effect as though such representations and warranties had been made on and as of such date, and Seller shall have delivered to Purchaser on the Closing Date a certificate, dated the Closing Date, to such effect.

assistant: Warranties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The execution, delivery and performance by the Servicer of the Transaction Documents to which it is a party (i) have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of the Servicer and (ii) do not contravene or constitute a default under (A) any applicable law, rule or regulation, (B) its organizational documents or (C) any material agreement, contract, order or other instrument to which it is a party or its property is subject (other than, in the case of clauses (A), (B) and (C), violations which do not affect the legality, validity or enforceability of any of such agreements and which, individually or in the aggregate, would not materially and adversely affect the transactions contemplated by, or the Servicer’s ability to perform its obligations under, the Transaction Documents).

assistant: Authorizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to corpora tions, see Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 74, 26 S.Ct. 370, 378-79, 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906), and an individual cannot assert his personal privilege in order to defeat a subpoena for corporate records, even if the records contain information incriminating him, see Bellis v. United States, 417 U.S. at 88-89, 94 S.Ct. at 2183-84; United States v. White, 322 U.S. at 699, 64 S.Ct. at 1251, and even if the documents were drafted by him in his capacity as a corporate officer. See Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 n. 11, 96 S.Ct. 1569, 1580 n. 11, 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976) (stating that “[t]he fact that the documents may have been written by the person asserting the privilege is insufficient to trigger the privilege”); Wilson v. United States, 221 U.S. at 378, 31 S.Ct. at 543 (<HOLDING>). “In producing records as an officer of the Options: A. holding that motion to dismiss should be denied if in view of what is alleged it can reasonably be conceived that the plaintiffs could upon a trial establish a case which would entitle them to relief B. recognizing that courts should not pass upon a constitutional question although properly presented by the record if there is also present some other ground upon which the case may be disposed of C. holding that counsel cannot be said to be ineffective for not filing a motion for which there is no legal basis D. holding that where an officer of a corporation has possession of corporate records which disclose his crime there is no ground upon which it can be said that he will be forced to produce them if the entries were made by another but may withhold them if the entries were made by himself E. holding that the district court did not abuse discretion in limiting the number of diary entries that could be read to the jury and explained by the defendant where there were hundreds of diary entries and all diaries were admitted into evidence and available for review by the jury

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that where an officer of a corporation has possession of corporate records which disclose his crime there is no ground upon which it can be said that he will be forced to produce them if the entries were made by another but may withhold them if the entries were made by himself
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in detail in Part III.A, neither the Original nor the First Amended Complaints stated a claim for compensation discrimination. Therefore the statute of limitation was not tolled for that claim as it would have been for the promotion discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation claims properly raised. IV Plaintiffs have also challenged the district court’s order decertifying the compensation discrimination class. To the extent Plaintiffs are challenging the district court’s decision to decertify the post-2000 compensation discrimination class, the district court did not abuse its discretion because the named Plaintiffs concede that they do not have standing with regard to the post-2000 claim. See Lierboe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 350 F.3d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). To the extent Plaintiffs are challenging the Options: A. holding that after a class is certified the controversy may exist between a named defendant and a member of the class represented by the named plaintiff even though the claim of the named plaintiff has become moot B. holding that a district of columbia consumer protection statute that authorized representative actions and did not reference class action requirements or mandate class certification was a separate and distinct procedural vehicle from a class action and thus did not constitute a class action under cafa C. holding that putative class members are not parties to an action prior to class certification D. holding that named plaintiff who did not have a viable claim against defendant could not serve as a class representative and vacating class certification accordingly E. holding that where named plaintiff was employee of class counsel district court did not abuse its discretion by denying class certification

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that named plaintiff who did not have a viable claim against defendant could not serve as a class representative and vacating class certification accordingly
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you agree not to interfere with the servers or networks underlying or connected to the products or to violate any of the procedures , policies or regulations of networks connected to the products .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice, demand, request, waiver or other communication required or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing (including electronic format) and will be deemed by the Parties to have been received (i) upon delivery in person (including by reputable express courier service) at the address set forth below; (ii) upon delivery by facsimile (as verified by a printout showing satisfactory transmission) at the facsimile number designated below (if sent on a business day during normal business hours where such notice is to be received and if not, on the first business day following such delivery where such notice is to be received); (iii) upon delivery by electronic mail (as verified by a printout showing satisfactory transmission) at the electronic mail address set forth below (if sent on a business day during normal business hours where such notice is to be received and if not, on the first business day following such delivery where such notice is to be received); or (iv) upon three business days after mailing with the Unit e d States Postal Service if mailed from and to a location within the continental United States by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the address set forth below. Any Party hereto may from time to time change its physical or electronic address or facsimile number for notices by giving notice of such changed address or number to the other Party in accordance with this section.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: `` booking.com '' , `` us '' , `` we '' or `` our '' means booking.com b.v. , a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the netherlands , and having its registered address at herengracht 597 , 1017 ce , amsterdam , the netherlands .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except with respect to the material terms and conditions of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents, the Company confirms that neither it nor any other Person acting on its behalf has provided any of the Purchasers or their agents or counsel with any information that it believes constitutes or might constitute material, non-public information which is not otherwise disclosed in the Prospectus Supplement or the Disclosure Package. The Company understands and confirms that the Purchasers will rely on the foregoing representation in effecting transactions in securities of the Company. The disclosure furnished by or on behalf of the Company to the Purchasers regarding the Company and its Subsidiaries, their respective businesses and the transactions contemplated hereby in the Disclosure Package does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and time of the sale. That notice, had it been given, would have stated the time of the sale. See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 51.002. If appellants wanted to avoid the sale, they were required to pay the balance on or before that time. While it would have been preferable for the bankruptcy court’s order itself to have given the parties a specific time on August 1, 2000 in which to make the $650,000.00 payment, we cannot agree that that flaw allows us to ignore the plain language of the order. Appellees’ also direct us to other extrinsic evidence to show the bankruptcy court did not intend the sale to occur only on August 1, 2000. However, the bankruptcy court’s order is not ambiguous. When an order is not ambiguous, we enforce it literally. Reiss v. Reiss, 118 S.W.3d 439, 441-42 (Tex.2003) (<HOLDING>); Gulf Ins. Co. v. Bums Motors, Inc., 22 S.W.3d Options: A. holding extrinsic evidence contradicting language in will inadmissible when will is unambiguous B. holding that arbitration clauses as contractual agreements must be enforced to their terms C. holding that in order for a contract to be enforced it is necessary that all the essential terms of the contract must first be established by competent evidence and shown to be definite certain clear and unambiguous D. holding that unambiguous decree must be enforced literally without consideration of matters extrinsic to the decree E. holding that extrinsic evidence admissible to determine intent of parties

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that unambiguous decree must be enforced literally without consideration of matters extrinsic to the decree