flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Reasonable costs and expenses of the Company or of any Member occasioned by transfers of Units held by Members (including, but not limited to, such Member’s proportionate share of any transfer or recordation taxes for which the Company may become liable) shall be reimbursed to the Company or Member, as the case may be, by the Transferring Member (or upon the failure thereof, by the transferee).

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any failure by either Party to enforce at any time any terms and conditions of this Agreement shall not be considered a waiver of that Party’s right thereafter to enforce such terms and conditions or any other terms and conditions of this Agreement.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No consents are required to be obtained from, and no filings are required to be made with, any Governmental Authority or third party in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Owner JV and Lessee JV or the consummation by Owner JV and Lessee JV of the transactions contemplated hereby.

assistant: Consents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any provision of this General Release is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions. On the contrary, such remaining provisions shall be fully severable, and this General Release shall be construed and enforced as if such invalid provisions never had been inserted in the General Release.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you may not charge any third party for using the software , and you may not modify , adapt , reverse engineer ( except as otherwise permitted by applicable law notwithstanding such limitation ) , decompile or attempt to discover the source code of the software , or create any derivative works of the software , or otherwise use the software except as expressly provided in this agreement .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Schedule 4.7 sets forth a list, as of the Closing Date, of all of the Subsidiaries of the Borrower and, as to each such Subsidiary, the percentage ownership (direct and indirect) of the Borrower and each direct owner thereof. Except for the ownership interests expressly indicated on Schedule 4.7 , as of the Closing Date, there are no ownership interests, warrants, rights, options or other equity securities, or other Capital Stock of any Subsidiary of the Borrower outstanding or reserved for any purpose. All outstanding ownership interests of each Subsidiary of the Borrower are duly and validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and necessary in each case.”); see also id. § 54.1020 ("The finding and recommendations become the decree or judgment of the court when adopted and approved by an order of the judge.”). 11 .The district court's order also addressed appellants' complaint regarding a ruling by the associate judge on a matter that was not raised in the notice of appeal to the district court. The district court ruled that right to de novo review of that matter was waived. No complaint is made on appeal of the district judge’s ruling on that matter. 12 . Appellants filed two appeals in this Court related to the denial of their motion for summary judgment. The first appeal was from the order of the associate judge and it was assigned appellate cause number 01-07-00307-CV. The S.W.2d 671, 677 (Tex.1979) (<HOLDING>); Likewise, because the question before the Options: A. holding that trial court may not grant summary judgment by default when the movants summary judgment proof is legally insufficient B. holding that a grant of summary judgment may be affirmed on any independent ground revealed by the record C. holding that the trial court may not grant summary judgment on a ground not raised in the motion D. holding that appellate court in affirming trial courts decision may rely in part on a ground not presented to trial court E. holding that trial court may not grant summary judgment on ground not presented by movant in writing

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that trial court may not grant summary judgment on ground not presented by movant in writing
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If Executive was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is otherwise involved (including involvement as a witness) in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (a “Proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he is or was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its affiliates, Executive shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended (but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits the Company to provide broader indemnification rights than permitted prior thereto), against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by Executive in connection therewith and such indemnification shall continue as to Executive if he ceases to be an officer or employee and shall inure to the benefit of Executive's heirs, executors and administrators; provided, however, that the Company shall indemnify Executive in connection with a Proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by Executive only if such Proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the board of directors of the Company. The right to indemnification conferred in this paragraph shall include the obligation of the Company to pay the expenses incurred in defending any such Proceeding in advance of its final disposition (an “Advance of Expenses”); provided, however, that, if and to the extent that the Delaware General Corporation Law requires, an Advance of Expenses incurred by Executive in his capacity as an officer or employee shall be made only upon delivery to the Company of an undertaking, by or on behalf of Executive, to repay all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined by final judicial decision from which there is no further right to appeal that Executive is not entitled to be indemnified for such expenses under this paragraph or otherwise.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, enter into any transaction, including, without limitation, the purchase, sale, or exchange of Property, the rendering of any service or the payment of any management, advisory or similar fees, with any Affiliate of Borrower or such Subsidiary, except in the ordinary course of and pursuant to the reasonable requirements of Borrower’s or such Subsidiary’s business, pursuant to a transaction which is otherwise expressly permitted under this Agreement, and upon fair and reasonable terms no less favorable to Borrower or such Subsidiary than would be obtained in a comparable arm’s-length transaction with a Person not an Affiliate of Borrower or such Subsidiary.

assistant: Transactions With Affiliates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: as implicating the constitutional guarantee”); Carson v. Fischer, 421 F.3d 83, 92 (2d Cir. 2005) (“[e]ven an unjustified closure may, in some circumstances, be so trivial as not to implicate the right to a public trial”); People v. Webb, 267 Ill. App. 3d 954, 959, 642 N.E.2d 871, 205 Ill. Dec. 6 (1994) (“the defendant’s right to a public trial was not violated” by a de minimis closure); People v. Woodward, 4 Cal. 4th 376, 384-86, 841 P.2d 954, 14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 434 (1992) (applying the “de minimis rationale” and concluding that the right to a public trial was not violated); State v. Lindsey, 632 N.W.2d 652, 660-61 (Minn. 2001) (applying a “triviality standard” and concluding that no violation of the right to a public trial occurred); State v. Torres, 844 A.2d 155, 162 (R.I. 2004) (<HOLDING>). ¶32 Critically, courts that have found a Options: A. holding the sixth amendment applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment B. recognizing that the sixth amendment is not violated every time the public is excluded from a courtroom an unjustified closure may on its facts be so trivial as not to violate the sixth amendment guarantee C. holding that rule 606b does not violate the sixth amendment D. holding that the court lacks jurisdiction over sixth amendment claims because the sixth amendment is not moneymandating E. holding that some closures are too trivial to implicate the sixth amendment right to a public trial

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that the sixth amendment is not violated every time the public is excluded from a courtroom an unjustified closure may on its facts be so trivial as not to violate the sixth amendment guarantee
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: act, not within the scope of the common purpose, but growpng] out of the individual malice of the perpetrator. 1 Wharton Crim.Law, § 397.” Keller v. State, 380 So.2d 926, 935 (Ala.Cr.App.1979), cert. denied, 380 So.2d 938 (Ala.1980). The capital offense of which this defendant was convicted, see § 13A-5-40(a)(7), Ala.Code 1975, requires (1) proof of an intentional murder and (2) proof that the murder was committed for pecuniary gain, or pursuant to a contract, or for hire. Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4, 24 (Ala.Cr.App.1993). We agree with the defendant that his intent that Pope kill Elmer Woodall pursuant to a contract could not supply the intent necessary to convict the defendant for the capital murder-for-hire of Clemer Woodall. Cf. Tomlin v. State, 591 So.2d 550 (Ala.Cr.App.1991) (<HOLDING>). Rather, in order to convict the defendant of Options: A. holding that general verdicts failed to reveal whether defendant was convicted on accomplice liability theory and that evidence supported accomplice liability theory B. holding that under the accomplice liability doctrine a nontriggerman accomplice may be convicted of double murder a capital offense under 13a540a10 alacode 1975 only if he had the particularized intent that both victims be killed C. holding that a defendant may be convicted of felony murder when the death of his accomplice was a reasonably foreseeable result of their commission of a felony D. holding that in order to convict a defendant of firstdegree murder on a theory of accomplice liability proof of his own premeditation is required E. holding that alabama appellate courts have repeatedly held that to be convicted of a capital offense and sentenced to death a defendant must have had a particularized intent to kill

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that under the accomplice liability doctrine a nontriggerman accomplice may be convicted of double murder a capital offense under 13a540a10 alacode 1975 only if he had the particularized intent that both victims be killed
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any matter arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the making, performance or interpretation hereof, shall be submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal and state courts sitting in the County of Nassau, State of New York. The parties irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, agree not to assert any claim or defense that is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of such courts or that such forum is not convenient or the venue thereof is improper, and consent to service of process in any action or proceeding by written notice, delivered in the manner provided for in Section 13.2 .

assistant: Jurisdictions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This First Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties on separate counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute but one and the same First Amendment. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this First Amendment by facsimile or a scanned copy by electronic mail shall be equally as effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this First Amendment.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (and any changes of [his] address and telephone number) as required ... and did not appear at [his] hearing through no fault of [his] own. In the administrative proceedings, Jobe claimed that he received inadequate notice of the hearing on his OSC, but he has abandoned that claim in this court. 3 . Because deportation proceedings are civil, the Sixth Amendment guarantee of effective counsel in criminal proceedings is inapplica ble. Nonetheless, we have recognized that "there is a due process violation if [a deportation proceeding] was so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting his case." Bernal-Vallejo v. INS, 195 F.3d 56, 63 (1st Cir.1999) (collecting cases). It is in this sense that the phrase "ineffective assistance of counsel" has made 1999) (<HOLDING>); cf. Iavorski v. INS, 232 F.3d 124 (2d Options: A. holding that ina 242bc3as time bar is not jurisdictional and thus subject to equitable tolling B. holding title vii subject to equitable tolling C. holding that oneyear limitations period set forth in 2255 is not a jurisdictional bar and is thus subject to equitable tolling D. holding that the ninetyday filing requirement is not a jurisdictional prerequisite and is subject to equitable tolling E. holding that ina 242bc3a sets forth a mandatory and jurisdictional time bar

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that ina 242bc3as time bar is not jurisdictional and thus subject to equitable tolling
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: At the Closing, the Company hereby authorizes the Buyer, as detailed in the disbursement memorandum of even date, to pay the Buyer’s legal counsel directly in the amount of $3,500.00, which such amount shall be withheld from the proceeds relating to the first tranche of $25,000.00, as further described in the Note and disbursement memorandum.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall indemnify and hold Executive harmless for acts and omissions in Executive’s capacity as an officer, director or employee of the Company to the maximum extent permitted under applicable law; provided , however , that neither the Company, nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, shall indemnify Executive for any losses incurred by Executive as a result of acts described in paragraph 1(c) of this Agreement.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement represents the wording selected by the Parties to define their agreement and no rule of strict construction shall apply against either Party. Whenever the context reasonably permits, the singular shall include the plural, the plural shall include the singular, and the whole shall include any part thereof. The section and other headings are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.

assistant: Construction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The form, terms and conditions of each Restricted Stock Unit shall be determined by the Committee and shall be set forth in an Award Agreement. Such terms and conditions may include, without limitation, the conditions or circumstances upon which such Restricted Stock Unit will be paid, forfeited or otherwise modified, and the date or dates upon which any Shares, cash or other property shall be delivered to the Participant in respect of the Restricted Stock Units. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, establish one or more conditions to the vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit including, without limitation, conditions the satisfaction of which are measured by Performance Criteria. All or any part of any outstanding Restricted Stock Unit granted to any Participant may be vested in full or paid upon the occurrence of such special circumstances or events as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: according to Green. The proposition is one of first impression. And, as interesting as the argument is, to so construe section 692 as authorizing the court to conduct a preliminary bench hearing to assess capacity would not only lead to an absurd result but also would nullify section 643. For instance, one cannot reasonably deny that an ultimate fact in a proceeding such as that at bar involve s contention, if the applicant succeeded in proving the ultimate fact to the court and won the right to submit the same issue to a jury, then one can only wonder why submission to a jury would be needed to obtain a guardianship. This is so because, by applying the strue it in a manner harmonious with sections 692 and 693. See St. Luke’s Episcopal Hosp. v. Agbor, 952 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.1997) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, such a harmonious' result is Options: A. holding that the words and provisions of a statute must be construed in a harmonious way B. holding that a contract must be read as a whole in order to give a reasonable and harmonious meaning and effect to all of its provisions citation omitted C. holding that rule 6b cannot be construed to nullify the specific provisions of the statute D. holding that the terms of a forfeiture statute must be strictly construed and as a result the words of a statute must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resorting to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand the statutes operation E. recognizing that statutes should be construed to avoid conflict and to form a harmonious whole

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the words and provisions of a statute must be construed in a harmonious way
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Company is authorized to amend this Agreement, to void or amend any election made by the Participant under this Agreement and/or to delay the payment of any monies and/or provision of any benefits in such manner as may be determined by the Company, in its discretion, to be necessary or appropriate to comply with the Section 409A Regulations without prior notice to or consent of the Participant. The Participant hereby releases and holds harmless the Company, its directors, officers and stockholders from any and all claims that may arise from or relate to any tax liability, penalties, interest, costs, fees or other liability incurred by the Participant in connection with the Award, including as a result of the application of Section 409A.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: we deny the City’s petition directed to the trial court’s- disqualification order and dismiss as premature the City’s petition directed to the trial court’s denial of the City’s motion to dismiss. Petition Directed To Trial Judge’s Disqualification Order (3D16-900) The City sought to disqualify the trial judge because of statements made by the judge during the hearing on the City’s motion to dismiss. After the trial' court denied the City’s recusal motion, the City filed a petition with this court seeking prohibition. Taken in context, the trial court’s statements that formed the basis of the City’s recusal motion did not create in a reasonably prudent person a well-founded fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial. Forehand v. Walton Cty., 172 So.3d 517, 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (<HOLDING>). ■ Therefore, we deny the City’s petition for Options: A. holding that bankruptcy judges are not bound by appellate ruhngs of single district judges even those from their own district B. recognizing that tjrial judges are permitted to be aware of events in their own communities general observations acknowledging such awareness are insufficient to establish a basis for disqualification C. recognizing that states may establish procedural rules governing litigation in their own courts D. holding that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts even when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction and are alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly E. holding that indian tribes are distinct independent political communities retaining their original natural rights in matters of selfgovernment

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that tjrial judges are permitted to be aware of events in their own communities general observations acknowledging such awareness are insufficient to establish a basis for disqualification
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: For the avoidance of doubt, with respect to payments made by the Performance Guarantor to a Beneficiary, the Performance Guarantor shall be required to comply with the provisions of Section 5.03(a) of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, which provisions are hereby incorporated herein by reference, mutatis mutandis.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as would not, either individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, each of Holdings, the Borrower and its Subsidiaries has timely filed Tax returns and reports required to be filed, and have timely paid all Taxes (including satisfying its withholding tax obligations) levied or imposed on their properties, income or assets (whether or not shown in a Tax Return), except those which are being contested in good faith by appropriate actions diligently conducted and for which adequate reserves have been provided in accordance with GAAP. There is no proposed Tax assessment, deficiency or other claim against any Loan Party or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries except (i) those being actively contested by a Loan Party or such Restricted Subsidiary in good faith and by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted that stay the enforcement of the Tax in question and for which adequate reserves have been provided in accordance with GAAP or (ii) those that would not reasonably be expected to, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Credit Parties and their Subsidiaries maintain insurance coverage by such insurers and in such forms and amounts and against such risks as are generally consistent with industry standards and in each case in compliance with the terms of Section 6.03 . Schedule 5.17 sets forth a complete list of all insurance maintained by the Credit Parties on the Closing Date.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company and the Participant shall comply with all federal and state laws and regulations respecting the required withholding, deposit and payment of any income, employment or other taxes relating to the Award (including Dividend Equivalents). The Company shall withhold the employer’s minimum statutory withholding based upon minimum statutory withholding rates for federal and state purposes, or as otherwise approved by the Committee, including payroll taxes that are applicable to such supplemental taxable income. Any payment of required withholding taxes by the Participant in the form of Common Stock shall not be permitted if it would result in an accounting charge to the Company with respect to such shares used to pay such taxes unless otherwise approved by the Committee.

assistant: Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Forfeiture occurs because of neglect, while waiver happens intentionally. United States v. Charles, 476 F.3d 492, 495 (7th Cir.2007). Waiver precludes review, while forfeiture permits plain error review. Id. While Garrett failed to timely assert his challenge to the assessment of a criminal history point for his bail jumping conviction, there is no indication on the record that Garrett knew that his criminal history score might be erroneous, nor would he choose to be sentenced under a higher criminal history score and thus a higher Guidelines range. A logical explanation is that neither Garrett nor his counsel realized that including the bail jumping conviction was incorrect, therefore we review for plain error. See United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes, 406 F.3d 845, 847-49 (7th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Under the plain error test, we must decide Options: A. holding that arithmetical error that resulted in an increase to a defendants base offense level pursuant to the sentencing guidelines affected his substantial rights even though the resulting sentence was within the range for the correct offense level B. holding that the convening authority has unfettered discretion to modify the findings and sentence for any reason without having to state a reason so long as there is no increase in severity C. holding that a defendants confirmation of a psrs findings does not waive a challenge on appeal where there is no conceivable strategic reason for not objecting to a sentence at a higher offense level D. holding issues not raised at trial level cannot be argued for the first time on appeal E. holding that if the record does not reflect that the sentence was pronounced in the defendants presence there is no sentence and the court is without jurisdiction to entertain an appeal

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a defendants confirmation of a psrs findings does not waive a challenge on appeal where there is no conceivable strategic reason for not objecting to a sentence at a higher offense level
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the district court’s Rule 10(e) factual findings in the Settling Order were appropriate, the Defendants have not made the requisite showing of an affirmative courtroom closure for a non-trivial duration. See United States v. Shryock, 342 F.3d 948, 974 (9th Cir.2003) (a defendant must show not mere closure, but that it was closed affirmatively, completely, and pursuant to judicial act or order); see also United States v. Rivera, 682 F.3d 1223, 1229 (9th Cir.2012) (when a closure is trivial, “exclusion of members of the public from a judicial proceeding does not implicate the constitutional guarantee”); United States v. Withers, 638 F.3d 1055, 1063 (9th Cir.2011) (a courtroom closure must be total and of significant duration); United States v. Ivester, 316 F.3d 955, 959-60 (9th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). Here, the Settling Order reveals that the Options: A. holding that some closures are too trivial to implicate the sixth amendment right to a public trial B. recognizing that the sixth amendment is not violated every time the public is excluded from a courtroom an unjustified closure may on its facts be so trivial as not to violate the sixth amendment guarantee C. holding the sixth amendment right to a jury trial applies to the states through the fourteenth amendment D. holding that the fourteenth amendment incorporated the sixth amendment right to counsel E. holding that a criminal defendant has a sixth amendment right to counsel at trial

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that some closures are too trivial to implicate the sixth amendment right to a public trial
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower has furnished to the Administrative Agent copies of (i) the audited consolidated balance sheets of the Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014, and the related audited consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flow for the fiscal years ended on such dates, with the opinion thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP, and (ii) the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets of the Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015, and the related unaudited consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flow of the Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries for the fiscal quarter period ended on such date. Such financial statements (including in each case related schedules and notes) are complete and correct in all material respects and present fairly as of the respective dates thereof, in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the periods involved, the consolidated financial position of the Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries as at their respective dates and the results of operations and the cash flow for such periods (subject, as to interim statements, to changes resulting from normal year end audit adjustments). None of the Parent, the Borrower or any of their respective Subsidiaries has on the Agreement Date any material contingent liabilities, liabilities, liabilities for taxes, unusual or long-term commitments or unrealized or forward anticipated losses from any unfavorable commitments that would be required to be set forth in its financial statements or notes thereto, except as referred to or reflected or provided for in said financial statements.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parent has furnished to each Lender copies of the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and the related audited consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the fiscal year ending on such dates, with the opinion thereon of Ernst and Young LLP. Such financial statements (including in each case related schedules and notes) present fairly, in all material respects and in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the periods involved, the consolidated financial position of the Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries as at their respective dates and the results of operations and the cash flow for such periods. Neither the Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has on the Agreement Date any material contingent liabilities, liabilities, liabilities for taxes, unusual or long-term commitments or unrealized or forward anticipated losses from any unfavorable commitments that would be required to be set forth in its financial statements or in the notes thereto, except as referred to or reflected or provided for in said financial statements.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: steam whaler was wrecked in the Arctic Ocean, and some of its cargo was saved by the whaler accompanying it. Parties to the litigation had co-ownership interests amounting to about one-third of the salving vessel and about half of the wrecked vessel and her salvaged cargo. Id. at 922-23. After a thorough and insightful review of the case law on salvage where both vessels have the same owner, the district court concluded that “the authorities do not ... eliminat[e] from a salvage service the interests of all persons who may also have some interest in the salved property.” Id. at 924-25. The court awarded 46.6% of the award to the owners of the salving ship, with the remainder to the officers and the crew. Id. at 927. See also Jacobson v. Panama R. Co., 266 F. 344 (2d Cir.1920) (<HOLDING>). In apportioning the salvage award, the Options: A. holding that the current property owner may not assert a public nuisance claim against the former owner B. holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to deny an award of attorneys fees to the wife C. holding that where both vessels had the same owner it was not an abuse of discretion to give 75 of the salvage award to the owner D. holding stock dividend payable to actual owner not owner of record E. holding that premises owner had duty to use degree of care in performing activities that owner of ordinary prudence would use under same or similar circumstances

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that where both vessels had the same owner it was not an abuse of discretion to give 75 of the salvage award to the owner
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (3) is exempt from all state property taxation; see 36 P.S. § 651.15. On the other hand, the Commission possesses certain traits not at all characteristic of an arm of the state; for example, the Commission may sue and be sued in its own name; see 36 P.S. § 651.7(a)(3); and has the power to enter into contracts in its own name; see 36 P.S. § 651.7(a)(2). On balance, the “status under state law” factors weigh slightly in favor of the conclusion that the Commission is not an arm of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This is true, especially in light of the plurality holding of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Specter that the Commission is not an integral part of the Commonwealth, and thus cannot share the attributes of sovereignty which inhere in the state. Cf. Peters, 16 F.3d at 1351 (<HOLDING>). The Commission contends that in enacting Options: A. recognizing that it is an open question whether drpa is a federal agency governed by the apa or a state agency governed by state administrative law B. holding agencies of state government are part of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity C. holding that the commission is a commonwealth agency entitled to sovereign immunity D. holding that the delaware river port authoritys status under state law weighs in favor of the conclusion that the agency does not enjoy sovereign immunity especially in light of a pennsylvania supreme court case holding that the drpa is not an integral part of the commonwealth of pennsylvania citation omitted E. holding that the doctrine of sovereign immunity in the commonwealth resulted from a mistaken view of the law by earlier courts

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the delaware river port authoritys status under state law weighs in favor of the conclusion that the agency does not enjoy sovereign immunity especially in light of a pennsylvania supreme court case holding that the drpa is not an integral part of the commonwealth of pennsylvania citation omitted
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: To the best of the Borrower’s knowledge, neither the Lender Presentation Presentations, the CIM, nor any of the other reports, financial statements, certificates or other written information furnished by or on behalf of the Borrower to the Administrative Agent or any Lender in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or delivered hereunder (as modified or supplemented by other information so furnished), taken as a whole, contained any material misstatement of fact or omitted to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading as of the date furnished; provided that with respect to projected financial information, the Borrower represents only that such information was prepared in good faith based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: App. 898, 901 (3) (b), 904 (6) (611 SE2d 129) (2005) (affirming the trial court’s finding that there was insufficient probable cause for a DUI arrest even when the defendant admitted that she had been drinking alcohol, and reiterating that “evidence which shows only that the defendant had alcohol in her body while driving provides insufficient probable cause to arrest for DUI” (emphasis in original)). 14 Bostic, 332 Ga. App. at 607; accord Handley, 294 Ga. App. at 237-38; Ellison, 271 Ga. App. at 902 (3) (b). 15 Ellison, 271 Ga. App. at 901 (3) (a); accord Sanders, 274 Ga. App. at 397; see also State v. Young, 334 Ga. App. 161, 163 (778 SE2d 402) (2015) (“[A] trial court is not obligated to believe a witness even if that witness’s testimony is uncontradic ostic, 332 Ga. App. at 607-08 (<HOLDING>); State v. Damato, 302 Ga. App. 181, 183 (1) Options: A. recognizing that the necessary inquiry is not whether there was a warrant or whether there was time to get one but whether there was probable cause for the arrest B. holding that there was probable cause to arrest defendant for dui where among other factors the officer observed defendant driving erratically and defendants eyes were glassy C. holding that there was sufficient probable cause for the defendants dui arrest when the evidence showed that the officer smelled the odor of alcohol on the defendants breath the defendants eyes were bloodshot and watery and his breath test was positive for alcohol D. holding that the trial court was authorized to conclude that probable cause supported an arrest for dui when evidence showed that the officer detected the odor of alcohol coming from the defendants vehicle the defendant admitted to having consumed alcohol her breath tested positive for the presence of alcohol her speech was slurred and her eyes were red and watery and she failed the oneleg stand field sobriety test E. holding that there was insufficient probable cause for a dui arrest when inter alia there was testimony that the defendants eyes were bloodshot and watery

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that there was insufficient probable cause for a dui arrest when inter alia there was testimony that the defendants eyes were bloodshot and watery
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you agree that any content you place or that you authorize us to place on the service may be viewed by other users and may be viewed by any person visiting or participating in the service ( such as individuals who may receive shared content from other tinder users ) .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE MADE IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AND THE VALIDITY, INTERPRETATION, CONSTRUCTION AND PERFORMANCE OF THIS SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN ALL RESPECTS SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WITHOUT REGARD TO ITS PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Credit Party and each of its Subsidiaries has obtained or has the right to use all patents, trademarks, service marks, trade names, copyrights, licenses and other rights with respect to the foregoing necessary for and material to the present and planned future conduct of its business, without any known conflict with the rights of others, except for such patents, trademarks, service marks, trade names, copyrights, licenses and rights, the loss of which, and such conflicts that, in any such case individually or in the aggregate could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. As of the Closing Date, Schedule 5.15 sets forth a complete list of all material licenses, trade names and service marks and all registered patents, trademarks and copyrights, in each case with respect to Intellectual Property.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: were with private landlords. As a result, when the NYCHA terminated their Section 8 benefits and they were no longer able to pay their rent, the private landlords commenced eviction proceedings against the plaintiffs. The court held that the “in aid of jurisdiction” to the Anti-Injunction Act applied, reasoning that: Unless eviction proceedings are stayed long enough to adjudicate plaintiffs’ alleged right to retroactive reinstatement in the Section 8 program, plaintiffs will be evicted before this case can be decided. In this event, the Court will be unable to accord meaningful relief to the parties. Reinstatement in S , 1002 (4th Cir.1970) (affirming the district court’s injunction of a state court eviction proceeding where t CV-5883, 2006 WL 354983, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2006) (<HOLDING>); cf. Atl. Coast Line, 398 U.S. at 295, 90 Options: A. holding federal court was not precluded by antiinjunction act from enjoining florida state court after state court entered a preliminary order B. holding that the antiinjunction act barred the court from enjoining eviction proceedings in the suffolk county district court fifth district because the court had jurisdiction to hear the plaintiffs claims under the real estate settlement procedures act C. holding that because the pending eviction proceedings do not give plaintiffs an adequate forum to challenge termination of their section 8 assistance under the exceptions to the doctrine of younger abstention and the antiinjunction act the court may stay housing court proceedings until the validity of the termination of plaintiffs assistance can be decided D. holding that the plaintiff in an eviction proceeding by a private landlord in federally funded section 8 housing could assert claims for violations of the rehabilitation act and fha as affirmative defenses with regard to nopet policy E. holding that the antiinjunction act barred the court from enjoining eviction proceedings because claims for rescission under tila can be brought in state court including as a defense to an eviction claim in housing court

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the antiinjunction act barred the court from enjoining eviction proceedings because claims for rescission under tila can be brought in state court including as a defense to an eviction claim in housing court