flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The rights and liabilities of the parties hereto will bind and inure to the benefit of their respective successors, heirs, executors and administrators, as the case may be; provided, however, that as the Company has specifically contracted for the Services to be provided by the Consultant hereunder, the Consultant may not assign or delegate the Consultant’s obligations under this Agreement either in whole or in part without the prior written consent of the Company.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If and to the extent that any Guarantor’s obligations hereunder are terminated or are otherwise deemed to be invalid or unenforceable, such termination, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the continued effectiveness, validity or enforceability of this Guarantee with respect to any one or more of the other Guarantors. Wherever possible, each provision of this Guaranty shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Guaranty shall be prohibited by or invalid under such law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of this Guaranty.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the term of this Agreement, Chugach shall reimburse Thibert for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other business expenses incurred or paid by Thibert in performing his duties and functions hereunder, subject to Thibert’s accounting for and reporting such expenses pursuant to applicable Chugach policies.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice to the Company provided for in this Agreement will be addressed to it in care of its Secretary, John Bean Technologies Corporation, 70 West Madison Street, Suite 4400, Chicago, Illinois 60602, and any notice to the Employee (or other person entitled to receive the RSUs) will be addressed to such person at the Employee’s address now on file with the Company, or to such other address as either may designate to the other in writing. Any notice will be deemed to be duly given when enclosed in a properly sealed envelope addressed as stated above and deposited, postage paid, in a post office or branch post office regularly maintained by the United States government.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party shall be responsible for its own fees and expenses (including without limitation the fees and expenses of investment bankers, accountants and counsel) in connection with the entering into of this Agreement, the performance of its obligations hereunder and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby; provided, that in the event of any Action arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the non-prevailing party in any such Action will pay its own expenses and the reasonable documented out-of-pocket expenses, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, reasonably incurred by the prevailing party.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Group Member has title in fee simple to, or a valid leasehold interest in, all its real property, and good title to, or a valid leasehold interest in, all its other property, except in each case as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, and none of such property of the Guarantor is subject to any Lien except as permitted by Section 6.2.

assistant: Liens
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Without consent from the Bank, Borrower will not create, incur, or suffer to exist any Lien on the Collateral except (i) the security interest created by this Security Agreement, and (ii) Permitted Liens permitted pursuant to the Loan Documents.

assistant: Liens
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any waiver by a party or any breach of this Agreement by another party shall not be construed as a continuing waiver or as consent to any subsequent breach by the other party. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, no failure on the part of any party hereto to exercise and no delay in exercising any right, power or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, power or remedy hereunder preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or remedy.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, the right against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, and the right to confrontation and cross-examination guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, apply in juvenile proceedings in which a juvenile can be imprisoned for a term of years. 1980 Doe, 62 Haw. at 72, 610 P.2d at 511; see also, e.g., In re Doe, 70 Haw. 32, 36-38, 761 P.2d 299, 302-03 (1988) (1988 Doe) (discussing Sixth Amendment right to confrontation) (abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Moore, 82 Hawai'i 202, 220-22, 921 P.2d 122, 140-42 (1996) (re foundation required for excited utterance exception to hearsay rale)); In re Doe, 77 Hawai'i 46, 49, 881 P.2d 533, 536 (1994) (1994 Doe) (<HOLDING>). While HRS § 571-11(1) proceedings need not Options: A. recognizing constitutional right to effective counsel B. recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel C. recognizing minors right to representation by counsel in a law violation proceeding D. holding that there is no constitutional right to representation by counsel at a parole revocation E. recognizing the right to counsel on appeal

assistant: The best answer is C. recognizing minors right to representation by counsel in a law violation proceeding
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No provision of this Agreement may be amended, altered, modified, waived or discharged unless such amendment, alteration, modification, waiver or discharge is agreed to in writing signed by the Executive and such officer of the Company as shall be specifically designated by the Committee or by the Board. Any signatures by the Chairman of the Board or of Chairman of the Compensation Committee may be relied upon as having been authorized by the Board.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of one or more of the entities in which the Debtor held an ownership interest. In such circumstances, this Court expected the Debtor to seek approval from bankruptcy courts to retain Mr. Kaplan to perform accounting services on behalf of his estate. The fact that Mr. Kaplan was performing such services for free or on behalf of one or all of the entities that the Debtor controls did not suspend this requirement. The Debtor’s failure to submit an application for retention of Mr. Kaplan prevented this Court from testing whether his services would benefit the interests of the estate and whether Mr. Kaplan may suffer from a conflict of interest that would otherwise prevent his employment by the Debtor’s estate. See, e.g., In re Liebfried Aviation, Inc., 445 B.R. 30, 34 (Bankr.D.Mass.2011) (<HOLDING>). VI. The Debtor’s Animus for his Creditors’ Options: A. recognizing that debtors failure to submit application for employ ment prevented the court from evaluating accountants purported disinterestedness and lack of a material adverse interest as regards the debtor and the bankruptcy estate B. holding that the debtors false statements about the location of assets of the estate were material to the proceedings C. holding creditors lacked standing to file an adversary action asserting the interests of the estate in seeking to prevent a former principal of the debtor from interfering with the chapter 11 reorganization given the lack of showing of the debtors consent and any determination by the bankruptcy court that the suit would be beneficial to the estate and necessary to a fair and efficient resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings D. holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code E. holding that proper forum for debtor to challenge actions of coexecutor of debtors deceased husbands estate was state probate court not bankruptcy court

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing that debtors failure to submit application for employ ment prevented the court from evaluating accountants purported disinterestedness and lack of a material adverse interest as regards the debtor and the bankruptcy estate
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: abuse of discretion standard, I concur in the result. 1. Standard of Review As the majority notes, the parties on appeal disagree as to which standard of review is applicable to the trial court’s sentencing. There is inconsistency amongst jurisdictions concerning which standard of review applies to those alleged sentencing errors not preserved at trial. There are at least three categories in which standards of review are applied to sentencing. Some jurisdictions apply the abuse of discretion standard when addressing the substantive reasonableness of a sentence, whereas procedural errors not raised at trial are reviewed for plain error. See United States. v. Judge, 649 F.3d 453, 457 (6th Cir. 2011) (“[sentences are generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion, but wher 160 (Neb. 2011) (<HOLDING>); State v. Georgius, 225 W. Va. 716, 696 S.E.2d Options: A. holding that the decision whether to grant a continuance lies in the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion B. holding that the admission or exclusion of evidence is within discretion of the trial court and that such determinations will not be disturbed on appeal absent clear abuse of discretion C. holding that a sentencing determination will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion by the district court D. holding that rulings on admissibility of evidence are within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a showing of abuse of that discretion E. holding that a sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion by the trial court

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion by the trial court
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility, the court shall, if the court believes that such a requirement would be appropriate and in the interests of justice, continue such a case for a period of not to exceed 180 days in order to require exhaustion of such plain, speedy, and eff edy is unavailable if it does not provide the form of relief sought by an inmate plaintiff because a remedy is available only if it can be availed for the "accomplishment of a purpose”) (citations omitted). 18 . Congress' intent to conserve judicial resources would be undermined were courts required to examine grievance procedures in each case to determine whether those procedures provided every remedy sought by a prisoner plaintiff. Alexander, 159 F.3d at 1326. See also Spence, 993 F.Supp. at 788 (<HOLDING>). 19 . This was intended and contemplated by Options: A. recognizing that exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to bringing a 1983 action B. holding that congress in enacting the plra was not inviting federal courts to formulate some fifty different rules of federal exhaustion based on the existence of state administrative remedies capable of achieving certain ends C. holding that courts have consistently required exhaustion of administrative remedies under foia D. recognizing that issue exhaustion requirement and requirement exhaustion of remedies are different E. holding that exhaustion is not required because the structure of the federal statute shows that congress did not intend to incorporate varying state exhaustion requirements into federal law as a prerequisite to federal district court review

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that congress in enacting the plra was not inviting federal courts to formulate some fifty different rules of federal exhaustion based on the existence of state administrative remedies capable of achieving certain ends
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Upon indefeasible payment in full in cash and performance of all of the Obligations (other than indemnification Obligations under Section 2.11 ), termination of the this Agreement and a release of all claims against the Lenders, and so long as no suits, actions proceedings, or claims are pending or threatened against any Indemnified Person asserting any damages, losses or liabilities that are Indemnified Liabilities, the Lenders shall deliver to Borrowers termination statements, mortgage releases and other documents necessary or appropriate to evidence the termination of the Liens securing payment of the Obligations.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: used a monthly licensing fee as the basis for his valuations.” Finally, the figure the court adopted was near the center of the range supported by the evidence. Id. at 534-35 (footnotes omitted). The evidence presented by Oracle provides a much more speculative basis for calculating hypothetical-license damages than the evidence in Polar Bear, Wall Data, and Jarvis. Although a copyright plaintiff need not demonstrate that it would have reached a licensing agreement with the infringer or present evidence of “benchmark” agreements in order to recover hypothetical-license damages, it may be difficult for a plaintiff to establish the amount of such damages without undue speculation in the absence of such evidence. Cf. Getaped.Com, Inc. v. Cangemi, 188 F.Supp.2d 398, 405-06 (S.D.N.Y.2002) (<HOLDING>). Here, because Oracle has no history of Options: A. recognizing the difficulty of calculating damages but not finding the task impossible B. holding that circumstantial evidence was sufficient to show that a method step was carried out by the direct infringer even in the absence of direct evidence for direct infringer C. recognizing the difficulty of determining a nonspeculative hypotheticallicense damages amount when the infringer is a direct competitor D. holding that competitor could seek only injunction under fdutpa not damages E. recognizing that courts and commentators have had difficulty determining the meaning of good faith in the definition of fair consideration

assistant: The best answer is C. recognizing the difficulty of determining a nonspeculative hypotheticallicense damages amount when the infringer is a direct competitor
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No material order, consent, approval, license, authorization or validation of, or filing, recording or registration with (except for (x) those that have otherwise been obtained or made on or prior to the Effective Date and which remain in full force and effect on the Effective Date and (y) filings which are necessary to perfect the security interests created or intended to be created under the Security Documents, which filings will be made within ten days following the Effective Date), or exemption by, any Governmental Authority is required to be obtained or made by, or on behalf of, any Credit Party to authorize, or is required to be obtained or made by, or on behalf of, any Credit Party in connection with, (a) the execution, delivery and performance of any Credit Document or (b) the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability of any such Credit Document.

assistant: Approvals
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: corroborated” by police. Id. at 330, 110 S.Ct. at 2416. Accord Pinkney v. State, 666 So.2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)(anonymous tip requires “detailed and specific information corroborated by police investigation” since the informant’s veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge are unknown). In this case, it mous” was that, even considering only the facts known to Officer Hall himself, her identity was readily ascertainable. Officer Hall knew that the informant was a McDonald’s employee, and they acknowledged each other when he arrived at the scene, with Ms. Steele pointing to Defendant’s vehicle. The cases support the proposition that an informant’s actual name need not be known so long as her identity is readily discoverable. See Lachs v. State, 366 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)(<HOLDING>). A “citizen-informant” Not only was Ms. Steele Options: A. holding that the law in effect at the time a contract is made is as much a part of the contract as if incorporated therein B. holding when one identified ground for an adverse credibility determination is supported by substantial evidence and goes to the heart of petitioners claim of persecution the court is bound to accept the ijs adverse credibility determination C. holding as much D. recognizing that a stay is as much a refusal to exercise federal jurisdiction as a dismissal E. holding that a tipster fully identified by occupation and address was entitled to as much credibility as a paid informer or the victims themselves

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a tipster fully identified by occupation and address was entitled to as much credibility as a paid informer or the victims themselves
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Ga. App. at 323 (1) (“[Rjights such as those conferred by the Fourth Amendment are personal in nature, and cannot bestow vicarious protection on those who do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place to be searched.”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 49 See Division 1 (a), supra. 50 See McClain v. State, 267 Ga. 378, 383 (3) (a) (477 SE2d 814) (1996) (while reiterating that the issue of the defendant’s future dangerousness may be relevant to sentencing but not to the question of his guilt, the Court concluded that, given the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, it was highly unlikely that the improper portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument contributed to the jury’s verdict); cf. Collier v. State, 266 Ga. App. 345, 351-355 (2) (596 SE2d 795) (2004) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. State, 261 Ga. App. 511, 517-518 Options: A. holding counsels failure to investigate alibi witness and eyewitnesses to the crime amounted to constitutionally deficient performance B. holding that there was no material prejudice arising from trial counsels repeated references to an accuseds invoking his right to counsel C. holding that trial counsels failure to object to the prosecutors repeated pervasive and clearly improper references during closing arguments to similar transactions committed by the defendant constituted deficient performance and amounted to prejudice that required a new trial D. holding that plaintiffs failure to object to the improper comments of defendant during closing arguments resulted in waiver of plaintiffs right to argue the issue on appeal because the trial court was not given an opportunity to rule on the issue E. holding that failure to object to properly admitted evidence was not deficient performance by trial counsel

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that trial counsels failure to object to the prosecutors repeated pervasive and clearly improper references during closing arguments to similar transactions committed by the defendant constituted deficient performance and amounted to prejudice that required a new trial
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the Term, Consultant shall cause (i) Consultant’s relatives and (ii) any entity controlled by Consultant (any such person or entity, a “ Consultant Affiliate ”), to refrain from any criticisms or disparaging comments about the Company or its Affiliates, or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, advisors or stakeholders, or in any way relating to Consultant’s employment or separation from employment; provided, however , that nothing in this Agreement shall apply to or restrict in any way the communication of information by any Consultant Affiliate to any state or federal law enforcement agency or require notice to the Company thereof, and Consultant also will not be in breach of the covenant contained above solely by reason of testimony or disclosure by such Consultant Affiliate which is compelled by applicable law or regulation or process of law. A violation or threatened violation of these prohibitions may be enjoined by the courts. The rights afforded under this provision are in addition to any and all rights and remedies otherwise afforded by law. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing herein will be deemed to amend or otherwise alter the terms of the Employment Agreement, including, without limitation, Section 7(g) thereof.

assistant: Non-Disparagement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Senior Lender hereby represents and warrants to Subordinated Creditor that as of the date hereof: (a) such Senior Lender has the legal capacity and authority to enter into, execute, deliver and carry out the terms of this Agreement, all of which have been duly authorized by all proper and necessary action; (b) the execution of this Agreement by such Senior Lender will not violate or conflict with any material agreement binding upon such Senior Lender or any law, regulation or order or require any consent or approval which has not been obtained; and (c) this Agreement is the legal, valid and binding obligation of such Senior Lender, enforceable against such Senior Lender in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally or by equitable principles.

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: From and after the Effective Date, Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of [the][each] Assigned Interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to [the][the relevant] Assignor for amounts which have accrued to but excluding the Effective Date and to [the][the relevant] Assignee for amounts which have accrued from and after the Effective Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Administrative Agent shall make all payments of interest, fees or other amounts paid or payable in kind from and after the Effective Date to [the][the relevant] Assignee.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: None of the issuance, delivery or sale of the Class C Re-REMIC Security, the consummation of any other of the transactions contemplated herein, or the execution and delivery of the Transaction Documents by it, nor compliance with the provisions of the Transaction Documents, does or will conflict with or result in the breach of any material term or provision of the certificate of formation or the organizational documents of it, and it is not in breach or violation of or in default (nor has an event occurred which with notice or lapse of time or both would constitute a default) under the terms of (A) any indenture, contract, lease, mortgage, deed of trust, note, agreement or other evidence of indebtedness or other agreement, obligation or instrument to which it is a party or by which it or its properties are bound, or (B) any law, decree, order, rule or regulation applicable to it of any court or supervisory, regulatory, administrative or governmental agency, body or authority, or arbitrator having jurisdiction over it, or its properties, in each case the default, breach or violation of which would have a material adverse effect on the Seller or on the ability of the Seller to perform its obligations under the Transaction Documents to which it is a party; and none of the consummation of any other of the transactions contemplated herein, or the compliance with the provisions of the Transaction Documents will result in such a default, breach or violation or which would have such a material adverse effect. The Seller is in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder, any applicable anti-money laundering statutes, including the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by Title III of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 and regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that retiree medical benefits had not "vested” during the term of the collective bargaining agreement for those private employees who had not retired before the agreement expired. For several reasons, this case is inapposite. The employer in Winnett was a private employer, not a public employer, so its employees could — and did — strike, and the employer could — and did — implement its last best offer upon that strike. Id. at 1003. The court was therefore determining not whether the expired agreement's terms persisted to maintain a static status quo but instead whether, under federal labor law, the employee’s retiree benefits had "vested” as soon as he became eligible to retire. Cf. Appeal of Town of Rye, 140 N.H. 323, 666 A.2d 948, 950, 953 (1995) Options: A. holding that the pittsburgh police department did not illegally terminate an officers hla benefits and that the police department was entitled to a subrogation interest against the officers thirdparty settlement B. holding that an accumulated sick leave buyback provision applicable when police officers left the town police department vested when the cba was in effect and must be maintained without change in substance or effect during the status quo period C. holding that an employee suspended because of the employees participation in an interview concerning her employment problems with a state police department did not impermissibly affect the states interest in the efficiency and performance of the police department and that the employee therefore was entitled to damages arising from the suspension D. holding that appellants complaint on appeal that the environment was coercive did not change the fact that he was not in custody when he voluntarily went to the police station was told several times he could leave and did leave after the interrogation E. holding that even if the plaintiff had asserted a cause of action under the virginia wrongful death act against the city police officers the police officers would be entitled to sovereign immunity

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that an accumulated sick leave buyback provision applicable when police officers left the town police department vested when the cba was in effect and must be maintained without change in substance or effect during the status quo period
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Lenders, the Lead Arrangers and each Agent shall have received all fees required to be paid, and all reasonable expenses for which invoices have been presented (including, without limitation, the reasonable fees, disbursements and other charges of counsel to the Agents), on or before the Closing Date. All such amounts may be paid with proceeds of Loans made on the Closing Date and will be reflected in the funding instructions given by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent on or before the Closing Date.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that Ariad contends provided the jury with substantial evidence relating to each of the three classes of molecules, and we deem them insufficient as a matter of law. Indeed, most of the testimony cited by Ariad was irrelevant to the question whether the inventors were in possession of the claimed invention as of the 1989 priority date. The '516 patent discloses no w scope of the right to exclude” must not “overreach the scope of the inventor’s contribution to the field of art as described in the patent specification”); Fiers, 984 F.2d at 1171 (“Claiming all DNA[s] that achieve a result without defining what means will do so is not in compliance with the description requirement; it is an attempt to preempt the future before it has arrived.”); cf. Carnegie Mellon, 541 F.3d at 1126 (<HOLDING>). Here, the specification at best describes Options: A. recognizing that the supremacy clause is not a source of any federal rights B. holding that the language of the arbitration clause any controversy or claim arising out of was broad enough to encompass the plaintiffs claim alleging fraud in the inducement of the contract C. holding estoppel claim could not lie in tort where the facts that support the claim could not support a claim for fraud or misrepresentation D. holding that the narrow description of the e coli pola gene did not adequately support a broad claim to the gene from any bacterial source E. holding a broad claim with no factual support was insufficient to satisfy rule 9b

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the narrow description of the e coli pola gene did not adequately support a broad claim to the gene from any bacterial source
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 713.31. See Wells v. Halmac Dev., Inc., 189 So.3d 1015, 1016-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the homeowner was not the prevailing party on the significant issues in this case, we affirm the trial court’s order denying the homeowner’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs. We also affirm the award of costs to the contractor in the consolidated case (4D15-2588), because the contractor was adjudicated to be the prevailing party in the litigation. The Contractor’s Cross-Appeal On cross-appeal, the contractor challenges the trial court’s determination that its lien was fraudulent. We affirm, because competent substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding of a fraudulent lien. See Delta Painting, 710 So.2d at 664 (<HOLDING>). “It is within the trial court’s discretion to Options: A. holding that defendants assertions of workproduct were not supported by competent evidence B. holding that the district courts finding of no discrimination was not clearly erroneous because the finding was supported by the record C. holding substantial evidence supported jury finding of abuse of process D. holding that a trial courts finding of a fraudulent lien must be supported by competent evidence E. holding law court will not overturn conclusions supported by competent and substantial evidence

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a trial courts finding of a fraudulent lien must be supported by competent evidence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall pay to the Executive in a lump sum on the first regular payroll date that follows the Retirement Date (or such earlier date as required by law) any base salary that is accrued but unpaid as of such date. The Executive shall be entitled to all benefits accrued up to the Retirement Date (including, for the avoidance of doubt, accrued but unused vacation pay), to the extent vested, under all employee benefit plans of the Company Group in which the Executive participates (except for any plan that provides for bonus, severance, tax gross-up, separation pay or termination benefits, or benefits continuation) in accordance with the terms of such plans, and any amounts required to be paid pursuant to applicable law; provided, that this Section 3.A shall not result in duplication of benefits with any other payment or benefit under this Agreement or any other agreement or plan. For the avoidance of doubt, any medical, dental, and other health insurance coverage in which the Executive (and his beneficiaries) participate as of the Retirement Date shall continue through the end of the month during which the Retirement Date takes place. The Executive shall also be entitled to receive from the Company any reimbursable expenses owed to the Executive under Section 3(e) of the Employment Agreement.

assistant: Benefits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties to each assignment shall execute and deliver to the Administrative Agent an Assignment and Assumption, together with a processing and recordation fee of $3,500 for each assignment; provided that (A) only one such fee will be payable in connection with simultaneous assignments to two or more Approved Funds by a Lender and (B) the Administrative Agent may, in its sole discretion, elect to waive such processing and recording fee in the case of any assignment. The assignee, if it is not a Lender, shall deliver to the Administrative Agent an Administrative Questionnaire.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by hand delivery to the other party or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or by overnight courier, addressed as follows: (a) if to you: your most recent address on the records of the Company; and (b) if to the Company: 312 Walnut Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202, Attention: Chairman of the Compensation Committee; or to such other address as either party shall have furnished to the other in writing in accordance herewith. Notice and communications will be effective on the date of delivery if delivered by hand, on the first business day following the date of dispatch if delivered utilizing overnight courier, or three business days after having been mailed, if sent by registered or certified mail.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to all of the provisions of the Stock Unit Agreement, upon the last day of the Performance Period, the Participant shall become vested in such number of PSUs, if any, as determined under the schedule below, based on the average annual rate of return on equity attained by the Corporation for the Performance Period, but only if the Participant remains continuously employed by the Corporation or one of its Subsidiaries through the last day of the Performance Period; any PSUs that do not become vested in accordance with this Paragraph 4(b) shall be forfeited and revert to the Corporation. The Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, shall determine the average annual rate of return on equity attained by the Corporation for the Performance Period and certify the percentage of PSUs vested. If the Participant’s employment with Northern Trust is terminated for any reason prior to the end of the Performance Period then, subject to Sections 4(c) and 4(d), the PSUs in the Participant’s Stock Unit Account that have not yet vested shall be forfeited and revert to the Corporation on such employment termination date. Upon the forfeiture of any PSUs, the Corporation shall have no further obligation to the Participant with respect to such PSUs, including the obligation to pay Dividend Equivalents thereon.

assistant: Vesting
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: References in the singular shall include the plural, and vice versa, unless the context otherwise requires. References in the masculine shall include the feminine and neuter, and vice versa, unless the context otherwise requires. Headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meanings of the provisions hereof. Neither party, nor its respective counsel, shall be deemed the drafter of this Agreement for purposes of construing the provisions of this Agreement, and all language in all parts of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either party.

assistant: Construction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: J.W. Goldsmith, Jr.Grant Co. v. United States, 254 U.S. 505, 512, 41 S.Ct. 189, 191, 65 L.Ed. 376 (1921) (expressly reserving question whether "property stolen from the owner or otherwise taken from him without his privity or consent” may be forfeited); Peisch v. Ware, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 347, 361-63, 2 L.Ed. 643 (1808) ("a forfeiture can only be applied to those cases in which the means that are prescribed for the prevention of a forfeiture may be employed”). 15 . See, e.g., Clagett, 3 F.3d at 1357 (property owners have right to adequate notice prior to administrative forfeiture); United States v. Rogers, 984 F.2d 314, 317 (1993) (recognizing possibility of due process challenge to forfeiture statute in specific case of prosecutorial misconduct); One 1985 Mercedes, 917 F.2d at 420 (<HOLDING>); Wiren, 542 F.2d at 763 (recognizing due Options: A. holding that due process encompasses the right to counsel in a civil contempt proceeding B. holding discovery rules apply to civil forfeiture proceedings C. holding that both fourth amendment warrant and probable cause and fifth amendment due process requirements apply to civil forfeiture proceedings D. holding that exclusionary rule applies to civil forfeiture proceedings E. holding that vindictive prosecution claims in civil forfeiture proceeding may raise due process questions

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that vindictive prosecution claims in civil forfeiture proceeding may raise due process questions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if any provision of these terms of use is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or otherwise unenforceable , the parties nevertheless agree that such portion will be deemed severable from these terms of use and will not affect the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions , and the remaining provisions of the terms of use remain in full force and effect .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the elements of inherent undiscoverability and objective verifiability “balance the conflicting policies in statutes of limitations: the benefits of precluding stale or spurious claims versus the risks of precluding meritorious claims that happen to fall outside an arbitrarily set period.” S.V. v. R.V., 933 S.W.2d at 6; see Altai, 918 S.W.2d at 457. However, within the confines of the federal and Texas Constitutions, the Legislature is free to determine that the discovery rule should not apply in certain cases, and it has done so. See, e.g., Morrison v. Chan, 699 S.W.2d 205, 208 (Tex.1985) (“[T]he Legislature’s intent in passing Art. 4590i, § 10.01, was to abolish the discovery rule in cases governed by the Medical Liability Act”); cf. Neagle v. Nelson, 685 S.W.2d 11, 12 (Tex.1985) (<HOLDING>). In the case before us today, clear Options: A. holding that former article 4590i section 1001 violated the open courts provision when it abridged the right to sue before the claimant had a reasonable opportunity to discover the wrong B. holding that the delivery of an eeoc decision to the former attorney of a claimant did not constitute notice to the claimant C. holding that when a person entrusts effects to another and the police discover those effects in the others home by means of a search that violates article i section 9 the search also violates the entrustors rights under article i section 9 D. recognizing that where two parties claim to be the owners of the same debt or chose in action the party having the superior title by virtue of his earlier assignment may maintain an action for money had and received against the wrong claimant if the wrong claimant receives the money E. holding that because the due process clause in the federal constitution is applicable to the states under the fourteenth amendment the right is also guaranteed to defendants pursuant to the identical provision in article i section 5 of the hawaii constitution

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that former article 4590i section 1001 violated the open courts provision when it abridged the right to sue before the claimant had a reasonable opportunity to discover the wrong
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: simple references to the plaintiff-employees — as “good old boys” and “old-fashioned” are insufficient evidence of age-based animus under ADEA). Thus more likely, these types of isolated comments would be considered stray remarks. However, Ceinos’ comments do not seem to be motivated by Acevedo’s age, even if he admittedly “took it personally.” Even more, “it is far from clear that the alleged remarks bespeak any age-based animus at all.” El Dia, Inc., 304 F.3d at 69. Courts have held that “a statement that plausibly can be interpreted two different ways-one discriminatory and the other benign — does not directly reflect illegal animus.” Fernandes v. Costa Bros. Masonry, Inc., 199 F.3d 572, 583 (1st Cir.1999); see also Speen v. Crown Clothing Corp., 102 F.3d 625, 636 (1st Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>) In analyzing Ceinos’ comments, this Court Options: A. holding that ambiguous remarks tending to suggest animus based on age are insufficient standing alone to prove an employers discriminatory intent B. holding that isolated remarks are insufficient to prove discriminatory intent C. holding that circumstantial evidence alone may establish discriminatory intent D. holding that remarks made by decisionmakers could be viewed as reflecting discriminatory animus E. recognizing that the seventh circuit consistently has held that isolated comments that are no more than stray remarks in the work place are insufficient to establish that a particular decision was motivated by discriminatory animus

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that ambiguous remarks tending to suggest animus based on age are insufficient standing alone to prove an employers discriminatory intent
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The payment of any amount pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to applicable withholding and payroll taxes, and such other deductions as may be required under the Company࿽s employee benefits plans, if any.

assistant: Withholdings