flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: with respect to civil proceedings. The D.C. Circuit has neither recognized nor rejected that the First Amendment affords the public a right of access to civil proceedings. The government interprets the D.C. Circuit’s silence as a denial of the right. Quoting Ctr. for Nat’l Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, the government argues that the D.C. Circuit has never “indicated that it would apply the [First Amendment right-of-public-access] test to anything other than criminal judicial proceedings.” 331 F.3d 918, 935 (D.C.Cir.2003). In Ctr. for Nat’l Sec. Studies, however, the third party was not seeking access to judicial records in civil proceedings; rather, it sought Department of Justice investigation information on individuals detained for immigration violations. 331 F.3d at 934-35 (<HOLDING>). The Court is unaware of any D.C. Circuit Options: A. holding that the first amendment secures for the public and the press a right of access to civil proceedings B. recognizing common law right of access to judicial documents C. recognizing that first amendment provides qualified right of access to judicial documents D. holding that the first amendment right of public access does not extend to nonjudicial documents compiled during an executive branch investigation E. holding that there is no right of public access to documents considered in civil discovery motions

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the first amendment right of public access does not extend to nonjudicial documents compiled during an executive branch investigation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THE PARTIES AGREE THAT TO THE EXTENT ANY DISPUTE DOES NOT INVOLVE DISPUTED AMOUNTS IN EXCESS OF $1,000,000, ANY SUCH DISPUTE RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE DECIDED BY CONFIDENTIAL, BINDING NEUTRAL ARBITRATION AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS LAW TO BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES BY A SINGLE NEUTRAL ARBITRATOR. THE PARTIES ARE GIVING UP ANY RIGHTS EACH MIGHT POSSESS TO DISCOVERY AND APPEAL OF SUCH DISPUTES AND TO HAVE SUCH DISPUTES LITIGATED IN A COURT OR BY JURY TRIAL. THE AGREEMENT TO THIS PROVISION IS VOLUNTARY. Unless the Parties agree otherwise, the place of any arbitration shall be Harris County, Texas. The arbitrators shall issue a reasoned written decision and award which shall not include any damages which are prohibited hereunder. The obligations of the Parties under this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. In the event that any dispute involves amounts in excess of $1,000,000, the Parties may litigate the dispute in accordance with the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

assistant: Arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: raised, the purported defect in the notice of foreclosure is insufficient to withstand summary judgment. Under § 44-14-162.2, a secured creditor must provide the debtor with notice of a foreclosure sale that, in relevant part, “shall be in writing [and] shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the individual or entity who shall have full authority to negotiate, amend, and modify all terms of the mortgage with the debtorf.]” O.C.G.A. § 44-14-162.2(a). Georgia courts have concluded that substantial compliance with this statute’s notice provision is sufficient. See TKW Partners, LLC v. Archer Capital Fund, L.P., 302 Ga.App. 443, 446, 691 S.E.2d 300 (Ga.Ct.App.2010). See also Stowers v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 317 Ga.App. 893, 895, 731 S.E.2d 367 (Ga.Ct.App.2012) (<HOLDING>). Viewing the facts in the light most favorable Options: A. holding that notice to the attorney of record constitutes notice to the petitioner B. recognizing that the applicant received notice from the plea form even though such notice was not required C. holding that a defendant is not entitled to relief from default judgment because notice to an attorney of filing of motions and orders is constructive notice to the client even when the client did not have actual notice D. holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider an award of sanctions entered against attorney because the notice of appeal did not provide that attorney was appealing in his own name E. holding that notice of foreclosure listing name address and phone number of attorney rather than the lender was sufficient under 44141622 even though the attorney did not have full authority to negotiate amend and modify the loan and the notice listed no entity or individual with such authority

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that notice of foreclosure listing name address and phone number of attorney rather than the lender was sufficient under 44141622 even though the attorney did not have full authority to negotiate amend and modify the loan and the notice listed no entity or individual with such authority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: defendant “ ‘register as a sex offender under state law if required to do so’ ” because “it is axiomatic that a district court can include as a condition that the defendant obey the law”). Our decision does not foreclose an as-applied challenge in some later proceeding should the district court revoke Defendant’s release and should Defendant seek to challenge whether he was subject to the particular registration law at issue. In this appeal, though, the question whether Defendant must in fact register under federal or state law is not ripe for decision. AFFIRMED. 1 . Defendant expresses concern that the district court’s oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing varies from its written pronouncement, quoted in text. Cf. United States v. Bergmann, 836 F.2d 1220, 1222 (9th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). We see no direct conflict. In context, it is Options: A. holding that courts written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement B. holding that the trial courts oral pronouncement must conform to the written judgment C. holding that written judgment controlled over oral pronouncement D. holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement E. holding that in cases of direct conflict between a courts oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment the oral pronouncement controls

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that in cases of direct conflict between a courts oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment the oral pronouncement controls
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All authorizations, consents, approvals and licenses required under applicable law or regulation for the ownership or operation of the property owned or operated by Borrower, or for the conduct of any business in which it is engaged have been duly issued and are in full force and effect, except in each case to the extent that failure of the foregoing to be duly issued and in full force and effect would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Borrower is not in default, nor has any event occurred which with the passage of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a default, under any of the terms or provisions of any part thereof, or under any order, decree, ruling, regulation, closing agreement or other decision or instrument of any governmental commission, bureau or other administrative agency or public regulatory body having jurisdiction over Borrower, which default would have a Material Adverse Effect on Borrower. Borrower has all requisite governmental licenses, authorizations, consents and approvals to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under the Loan Documents to which it is a party.

assistant: Authorizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, including the Plans and the Definitive Documents, constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all other prior negotiations, agreements and understandings, whether written or oral, among the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement; provided , however , that any confidentiality agreement executed by any Restructuring Support Party shall survive this Agreement and shall continue to be in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: for an award of compensation to Petitioner, together with reasonable attorney fees, and other costs. The Clerk of the United States Court of Federal Claims will enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 . This Memorandum Opinion and Final Judgment are issued on an expedited basis to facilitate any appellate review that respondent ("the Government”) may wish to pursue. See House Report 99-908, 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 6344 ("House Report”) (awards are to be "made to vaccine-injured persons quickly, easily and with certainty and generosity"). 2 . Unfortunately, the court previously has had to correct arbitrary and capricious actions of the Special Master that have prejudiced other Vaccine Act petitioners. See Campbell v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 69 Fed.Cl. 775 (2006) (<HOLDING>); see also Cook v. Sec’y of Health and Human Options: A. holding that the special masters refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing rejection of affidavits and medical reports proffered by peti tioner but sua sponte introducing her own independent research into the record was fundamentally unfair and the special masters rulings were either inadequately explained or arbitrary and capricious B. holding no evidentiary hearing was required where the affidavits of the defendant and his wife were directly contradicted by the defendants sworn testimony during the plea hearing C. holding that this court has unambiguously explained that special masters are expected to consider the credibility of expert witnesses in evaluating petitions for compensation under the vaccine act D. holding that reviewing court should accord deference to special masters decision and may not substitute its own judgment for that of the special master E. holding that the magistrates recommended order terminating temporary supervision and placing the child in permanent guardianship was not supported by competent substantial evidence because the magistrate failed to hold an evidentiary hearing and that the failure to hold an evidentiary hearing violated the fathers due process rights

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the special masters refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing rejection of affidavits and medical reports proffered by peti tioner but sua sponte introducing her own independent research into the record was fundamentally unfair and the special masters rulings were either inadequately explained or arbitrary and capricious
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and other communications provided for herein (including any modifications of, or waivers, requests or consents under, this Agreement) shall be given or made in writing (including by telecopy) to the intended recipient at its “Address for Notices” specified below its name on the signature pages hereof or, as to either party, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a notice to the other party.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 372 U.S. 246 83 S.Ct. 688 9 L.Ed.2d 709 NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INC.,v.UNITED STATES. No. 479. Decided Feb. 25, 1963. PER CURIAM. 1 The petition for rehearing is denied. However, we think we should make clear the basis upon which our per curiam order affirmed the judgment of the District Court. 371 U.S. 223, 83 S.Ct. 311, 9 L.Ed.2d 273. The District Court dismissed appellants' action to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission on two grounds: (1) that the appellants lacked standing to challenge the Commission's order in the District Court; (2) that the appellants' challenge to the Commission's order was without merit. Our per curiam order affirmed the District Court's judgment insofar as it upheld the validity of the Commission's order on the merits. We disagreed that appellants lacked standing to challenge the Commission's order in the District Court. The appellants are associations of motor carriers, authorized under 49 U.S.C. § 5b, and perform significant functions in the administration of the Interstate Commerce Act, including the representation of member carriers in proceedings before the Commission. Since individual member carriers of appellants will be aggrieved by the Commission's order, and since appellants are proper representatives of the interests of their members, appellants have standing to challenge the validity of the Commission's order in the District Court. See Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1009(a); F.C.C. v. Sanders Bros. Radio Station, 309 U.S. 470, 60 S.Ct. 693, 84 L.Ed. 869; N.A.A.C.P. v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449, 459, 78 S.Ct. 1163, 1170, 2 L.Ed.2d 1488. 2 Petition for rehearing denied. 3 Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the denial of the petition for rehearing and in the affirmance of the judgment of the District Court insofar as that judgment refused to set aside the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission. He believes, however, that the question of 'standing' should not be decided without plenary consideration. 4 Mr. Justice STEWART would grant the petition for rehearing.

assistant: 9
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: to the extent you choose to access our service , you do so at your own initiative and are responsible for compliance with any applicable laws , including but not limited to applicable local laws .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: only shortly after the events at issue here.”). 36 . In Daniels, an inmate brought a civil rights action to recover for injuries allegedly sustained when he slipped and fell on a pillow, left by a deputy sheriff, on the stairs of the jail where he was confined. 474 U.S. at 327, 106 S.Ct. 662. 37 . It bears noting that circuit courts are split to this day as to whether a showing of intentional interference with the familial relationship is required. Six circuit courts require a showing of intentional interference with the familial relationship, and either explicitly state or suggest that the intent requirement applies to parents’ relationships with both minor and adult children. See Chambers ex rel. Chambers v. Sch. Dist. of Phila. Bd. of Educ., 587 F.3d 176, 190-92 (3d Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); Lowery v. Cnty. of Riley, 522 F.3d 1086, 1092 Options: A. holding that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity for actions taken in 1983 as any right to familial association was not sufficiently clear such that the defendants reasonably could have understood they were violating it because njeither the supreme court nor this court has clearly held wrongful prosecution and incarceration of a family member violates a right to familial association B. holding that expert report that sufficiently addressed certain claims against doctor employed by professional association was sufficient as to claims against professional association based on doctors negligence because the doctors negligence is imputed to the association under the professional association act C. recognizing this rule D. holding that only deliberate executive conduct gives rise to a familial association violation and explicitly noting that this rule applies to both minor and adult children E. holding that fourteenth amendment only applies to state action

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that only deliberate executive conduct gives rise to a familial association violation and explicitly noting that this rule applies to both minor and adult children
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: OF JURY TRIAL . EACH PARTY HERETO (INCLUDING, FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT, THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT) HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OF THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS. EACH PARTY HERETO (A) CERTIFIES THAT NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER AND (B) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT AND THE OTHER PARTIES HERETO HAVE BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT AND THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS, AS APPLICABLE, BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION 7.10 .

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Whenever notice is required to be given under this Warrant, such notice shall be given in accordance with the notice provisions contained herein. The Company shall provide the Holder with prompt written notice (i) immediately upon any adjustment of the Exercise Price, setting forth in reasonable detail, the calculation of such adjustment and (ii) at least 20 days prior to the date on which the Company closes its books or takes a record (A) with respect to any dividend or distribution upon the shares of Common Stock, (B) with respect to any grants, issuances or sales of any stock or other securities directly or indirectly convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of Common Stock or other property, pro rata to the holders of shares of Common Stock or (C) for determining rights to vote with respect to any Fundamental Transaction, dissolution or liquidation, provided in each case that such information shall be made known to the public prior to or in conjunction with such notice being provided to the Holder.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: injured, she was a temporary employee who was not eligible to be enrolled in PERS. N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7(b). Although we acknowledge that the wording of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-43, in this context, is subject to more than one interpretation, we agree with the PERS board that an employee must be a PERS member at the time of the alleged traumatic event and not merely when the application for the accidental disability pension is filed. We reject the logic of the argument that the Legislature implicitly created as large a class of eligible employees as urged by Smith and we decline the invitation to expansively view the scope of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-43 to cover a public employee based on events that occurred before the employee became a PERS member. See Cha-leff, supra, 188 N.J.Super. at 198, 457 A.2d 33 (<HOLDING>). We also reject Smith’s argument that she Options: A. holding that the burden rests upon the party seeking benefits to prove the injury sustained was the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of employment and the rule of liberal construction is not a substitute for the claimants burden of establishing his claim by a preponderance of the evidence B. holding that the court may not under the guise of statutory construction rewrite a statutory provision C. holding that an expansive view of the public pension statutes is undesirable because it may threaten the fiscal soundness of the fund and declaring that the availability of benefits should be undertaken by the legislature and not by the courts under the guise of liberal construction D. holding that a court may not rewrite the insurance contract under the guise of judicial interpretation E. holding that the courts in the absence of ambiguity should as a general rule confine themselves to a construction of a statute as written and not attempt under the guise of construction to supply omissions or remedy possible defects in the statute or to insert exceptions not made by the legislature

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that an expansive view of the public pension statutes is undesirable because it may threaten the fiscal soundness of the fund and declaring that the availability of benefits should be undertaken by the legislature and not by the courts under the guise of liberal construction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and involves an amount that cannot be calculated with specificity, it is equitable. Id. Here, the District Court’s order is clearly forward-looking and indeterminate, as it requires Goldman to pay Aleynikov’s attorney’s fees as he incurs them. We hold that the District Court’s order requiring the advancement of legal fees is injunctive and therefore immediately ap-pealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We join our sister circuits who have concluded the same under similar conditions. See Westar Energy, Inc. v. Lake, 552 F.3d 1215, 1222-23 (10th Cir.2009) (concluding that an order granting an executive advancement was an immediately appealable injunction because it required specific performance of a contract); Pac. Ins. Co. v. Gen. Dev. Corp., 28 F.3d 1093, 1096 (11th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). Goldman also urges us to exercise our pendent Options: A. holding sanctions order pursuant to district courts inherent powers not immediately appealable B. holding that an order directing an insurer to advance legal fees pursuant to an insurance policy was an immediately appealable injunction C. holding an insurer has a right to rely on statements made in an insurance application D. holding that an order of consolidation is interlocutory and not immediately appealable E. holding such denial to be an immediately appealable collateral final order

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that an order directing an insurer to advance legal fees pursuant to an insurance policy was an immediately appealable injunction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Debtor shall, at the sole cost and expense of the estate, maintain the policies of insurance described on Schedule (3.3) as in effect on the date hereof or otherwise in form and amounts and with insurers reasonably acceptable to Lender. The Debtor shall deliver to Lender, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Lender, endorsements to (i) all “All Risk” and business interruption insurance and (ii) all general liability and other liability policies.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: EACH PARTY HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY SUBMITS, FOR ITSELF AND ITS PROPERTY, TO THE NONEXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SITTING IN NEW YORK COUNTY AND OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, AND ANY APPELLATE COURT FROM ANY THEREOF, IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT, OR FOR RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT OF ANY JUDGMENT, AND EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN SUCH NEW YORK STATE COURT OR, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN SUCH FEDERAL COURT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW. NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT OR IN ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT SHALL AFFECT ANY RIGHT THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT OR ANY LENDER MAY OTHERWISE HAVE TO BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT AGAINST A CREDIT PARTY OR ANY OF ITS PROPERTIES IN THE COURTS OF ANY JURISDICTION.

assistant: Submission To Jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except to the extent otherwise provided in Section 5.1 of this Agreement with respect to amendments to Exhibit A, this Agreement may not be modified, amended or altered except pursuant to a written instrument signed by both parties.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive acknowledges that in the course of his relationship with the Company and its related entities Newpark Drilling Fluids, Newpark Mats and Integrated Services, Newpark Canada, and other affiliates (the “ Related Entities ” or referred to collectively with Newpark Resources as the “ Company ”) he will in the future receive certain trade secrets, programs, lists of customers and other confidential or proprietary information and knowledge concerning the business of the Company and its Related Entities (hereinafter collective referred to as “ Confidential Information ”) which the Company desires to protect. Executive understands that the information is confidential and he agrees not to reveal the Confidential Information to anyone outside the Company so long as the confidential or secret nature of the Confidential Information shall continue, other than such disclosure as authorized by the Company or is made to a person transacting business with the Company who has reasonable need for such Confidential Information. Executive further agrees that he will at no time use the Confidential Information for or on behalf of any person other than the Company for any purpose. Executive further agrees to comply with the confidentiality and other provisions set forth in this Agreement, the terms of which are supplemental to any statutory or fiduciary or other obligations relating to these matters. On the termination of employment or his Employment Agreement, Executive shall surrender to the Company all papers, documents, writings and other property produced by him or coming into his possession by or through his relationship with the Company or relating to the Confidential Information and Executive agrees that all such materials will at all times remain the property of the Company.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Manager will (a) maintain the Records for engineering, design, accounting, tax, regulatory, land and such other matters as are generally necessary for the conduct of the business of Owner, (b) assist and support Owner in general planning and budgeting activities and (c) coordinate and manage Owner’s reporting requirements for regulatory, tax, environmental or local compliance purposes.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 79 N.E.2d at 423. For all of these reasons, and under our deferential standard of review of the determinations of administrative agencies, we affirm the Board’s award of worker’s compensation benefits to Payne for the subsequent shoulder injury resulting from his fall on April 18, 2009. Affirmed. FRIEDLANDER, J., and RILEY, J., concur. 1 . Citing Muncie Ind. Transit Authority v. Smith, 743 N.E.2d 1214, 1217 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), Moorehead claims that Payne was required to establish the causal connection between the two injuries by expert medical evidence. Appellant's Br. at 3. But the holding in that case, requiring medical evidence to establish a causal relationship between the employment and the injury, is limited to injuries not caused by “a sudden and unexpected event.” Id. at 1217 Options: A. holding expert testimony necessary to establish the existence of a causal relationship between a particular toxin and its effect on the human body B. holding that to show a causal connection the plaintiff must demonstrate a relationship between the misconduct and the plaintiffs injury C. holding that the citys decision was arbitrary and capricious when it was contrary to the evidence and based solely on speculation arising from prior unrelated acts D. holding that the boards decision was contrary to law because it was based solely on smiths testimony and is not supported by medical evidence which shows a causal relationship between smiths employment and his carpal tunnel syndrome E. holding that an aljs own medical analysis which is contrary to medical evidence is invalid

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the boards decision was contrary to law because it was based solely on smiths testimony and is not supported by medical evidence which shows a causal relationship between smiths employment and his carpal tunnel syndrome
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement (except for Section 6 and Sections 8 through 15 , which shall survive indefinitely), and the obligation of the Equity Provider to fund the Contribution, will terminate automatically and immediately upon the earliest to occur of (a) the Closing Date, provided that the Equity Provider has satisfied its obligations with respect to the Closing Payment Contribution on or prior to the Closing Date, and (b) the date on which the Purchase Agreement has been validly terminated in accordance with its terms and, to the extent such termination results in the Buyer’s obligation to pay the Termination Fee in accordance with Section 8.2(d) thereof, the Buyer has paid the Termination Fee to the Sellers.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower and its Subsidiaries have filed all Federal, state and other material tax returns and reports required to be filed, and have paid all Federal, state and other material taxes, assessments, fees and other governmental charges levied or imposed upon them or their properties, income or assets otherwise due and payable, except those which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted and for which adequate reserves have been provided in accordance with GAAP. There is no proposed tax assessment against the Borrower or any Subsidiary that, if made, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither any Loan Party nor any Subsidiary thereof is party to any tax sharing agreement.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 392 U.S. 647 88 S.Ct. 2277 20 L.Ed.2d 1344 Jack LOPINSONv.PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1133, October Term, 1967. John J. COYLE v. PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1095, Misc., October Term, 1967. On Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Robert Leroy PRUETT v. OHIO. No. 1700, Misc., October Term, 1967. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio. Lester J. Schaffer, for petitioner Jack Lopinson. Howard M. Nazor and Gordon L. Nazor for petitioner Robert Leroy Pruett. Michael J. Rotko and Arlen Specter, for respondent Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in No. 1133. Michael J. Rotko, William H. Wolf, Jr., and Arlen Specter, for respondent Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in No. 1095, Misc. Joseph E. Mahoney, for respondent State of Ohio. June 17, 1968. PER CURIAM. 1 The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 1095, Misc., and No. 1700, Misc., are granted and the petitions for writs of certiorari in all three cases are granted. Without reaching the petitioners' other claims, the judgments are vacated and the cases remanded for reconsideration in the light of Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776. 2 Mr. Justice HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Black's dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 532, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 1782, 20 L.Ed.2d 776. 3 Mr. Justice WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 540, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 1786, 20 L.Ed.2d 776. 4 Mr. Justice BLACK, dissenting. 5 In all three of these cases the Court remands to the state courts on one single constitutional claim of petitioners without reaching other constitutional claims raised by them. The result is that after the state courts rule on the single remand issue this Court will undoubtedly be called on to pass on the other issues which the Court refuses to decide. At the very least this means postponement of a final decision in these cases a year or two years or three years, unless, that is, this Court should, on the second review, choose once more to decide the cases piecemeal. Piecemeal dispositions of criminal cases inevitably cause delays and hamper enforcement of the criminal laws and there is a lot of truth in the old adage that delay is a defendant's best lawyer. See Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776, where a murder sentence was reversed nine years after the murder. It is true that under Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837, a certain amount of delay is inevitable in criminal cases, but that is not true in these cases where the issues are squarely presented to us here and now.

assistant: 1
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The consent of the Parent shall be required prior to an assignment becoming effective unless the Assignee Lender is a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender or an Approved Fund; provided that the consent of the Parent shall be deemed to have been given if the Parent has not responded within fifteen (15) Business Days of a request for such consent and; provided , further , that the consent of the Parent shall not be required if an Event of Default under Section 9.01(a), (b), (i) or (j) has occurred and is continuing. The consent of the Administrative Agent, each Swingline Lender and each Issuer shall be required prior to an assignment becoming effective; provided that the consent of the Administrative Agent shall not be required for an assignment to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender or an Approved Fund. Any consent required under this Section 12.14(c) shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

assistant: Consents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: By its signature, each Person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party hereto represents and warrants to the other parties hereto that it is duly authorized to execute this Agreement. Each First Lien Agent represents and warrants that this Agreement is binding upon the applicable Senior Lenders. Each Second Priority Agent represents and warrants that this Agreement is binding upon the applicable Second Priority Secured Parties.

assistant: Authorizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: which it relates. Thus, when the affirmative defense of comparative negligence is raised, a negligence claim and the affirmative defenses of comparative and/or contributory negligence are inextricably intertwined.”). In a case raising the same issue as the one before us, the Kansas Court of Appeals reasoned as follows: The process of determining comparative fault, when only two parties are involved, is a “zero sum game.” When negligence is moved out of the plaintiffs column, it must move into the defendant’s column. Evidence that tends to exculpate plaintiff in a comparative fault case places fault upon the defendant, and evidence of subsequent remedial conduct to prove negligence is prohibited [by Rule 407]. DiPietro v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 28 Kan. App.2d 372, 16 P.3d 986, 991 (2000) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 19 We agree with the analysis in DiPie-tro Options: A. holding evidence of other crimes inadmissible when identity is not at issue B. holding that the bar against the admission of evidence of subsequent remedial measures comes into play only where negligence or other culpable conduct is alleged C. holding that to the extent plaintiffs present action is based on conduct subsequent to the original action it is not barred by the prior litigation D. holding first offender plea admissible to disprove or contradict testimony of the plaintiff E. holding that evidence of subsequent remedial conduct to disprove a plaintiffs comparative fault is inadmissible

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that evidence of subsequent remedial conduct to disprove a plaintiffs comparative fault is inadmissible
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail or other transmission method and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: amended its order to disqualify Camenisch on March 27, 1998. 6 . Attorney Camenisch represents Mrs. Wagner on appeal because, he explained at oral argument, the trial court’s disqualification order did not extend to this court — a question we decline to address. 7 . The Wagners contend that there is a question of fact as to when Sellinger was terminated, suggesting it was later than July 21. That contention has no merit. Mrs. Wagner stated in her second amended complaint that she terminated the relationship "on or about July 21, 1994.” She retained Mr. Camenisch on July 31, 1994. Despite Sellinger’s failure to withdraw his appearance, the record makes clear that he did not continue to serve as Mrs. Wagner’s counsel after July 21, 1994. 8 . This July 25, 1994 motion was , 1219-20 (1986) (<HOLDING>); Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Fabricating, Options: A. holding that negligently allowing a statute of limitations to run does not constitute an ethical violation B. recognizing that the statute of limitations for a survival action began to run on the date of the decedents injury as though he was bringing his own lawsuit C. holding that limitations period began to run when flooding occurred not when plaintiffs learned city had been on notice of flooding potential and had fraudulent motive D. holding statute of limitations began to run when plaintiffclient learned attorney negligently drafted contract not later when plaintiff lost on merits defending contract in lawsuit E. holding that the date on which the plaintiff learned of the defendants denial of tenure not the date on which the plaintiff became unemployed was when the statute of limitations began to run

assistant: The best answer is D. holding statute of limitations began to run when plaintiffclient learned attorney negligently drafted contract not later when plaintiff lost on merits defending contract in lawsuit
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Nothing in this Agreement should in any way be deemed (i) a waiver of the Specified Defaults or any Other Default or any term or provision of the Credit Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents or (ii) an agreement to forbear from exercising any rights or remedies with respect to the Specified Defaults (except as expressly set forth herein) or any Other Default. The Administrative Agent, the Lenders and the other Secured Parties have not waived or released, are not by this Agreement waiving or releasing, and have no present intention of waiving or releasing, the Specified Defaults or any Other Default, or any remedies or rights of the Administrative Agent, the Lenders and/or any other Secured Party with respect thereto, all of which are hereby expressly reserved. Any waiver of the Specified Defaults or any Other Default shall be effective only if set forth in a written instrument executed and delivered in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.08 of the Credit Agreement.

assistant: No Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: repayment or it was convenient for him or her to do so, and the statute of limitations would begin to run at that time. Despite the evidentiary problems inherent in proving the state of the debtor's finances at various times before an action is initiated, some courts have found that this view is better aligned with the parties' intent and the general rules of contract law. See Annotation, 14 A.L.R. 4th at 1385; see also Rees v. Heyser, 404 N.E.2d 1183 (Ind.Ct.App.1980) (where individual sought repayment of oral loan which did not contain a definite time of repayment, the court held that the statute of limitations did not begin to run on the promise until a reasonable time for performance had elapsed); Phillips & Jordan Invest. Corp. v. Ashblue Co., 86 N.C.App. 186, 357 S.E.2d 1 (1987) (<HOLDING>). Because this intermediate approach emphasizes Options: A. holding that a notice of claim period did not begin to run until discovery of the injury B. holding that the statute of limitations for an attorney malpractice suit did not begin to run until the client had suffered some actual damage C. holding in an action on a verbal agreement which failed to specify time for repayment that the statute of limitations did not begin to run until reasonable time for repayment had passed D. holding that where parties to an oral loan agreed that the loan would be repaid on demand the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the date plaintiff demanded repayment of the loan E. holding that where oral loan was silent as to the time of repayment the statute of limitations began to run at the time the contract was made

assistant: The best answer is C. holding in an action on a verbal agreement which failed to specify time for repayment that the statute of limitations did not begin to run until reasonable time for repayment had passed
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company will, and will cause each Subsidiary to, timely file complete and correct United States federal and applicable foreign, state and local tax returns required by law and pay when due all taxes, assessments and governmental charges and levies upon it or its income, profits or Property provided that neither the Company nor any Subsidiary need pay any such tax, assessment, governmental charge or levy if it is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings, with respect to which adequate reserves have been set aside in accordance with GAAP unless the failure to make any such payment (i) would give rise to an immediate right to foreclose or collect on a Lien securing such amounts or (ii) would have or would reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Taxes