flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Debtor hereby acknowledges and agrees that there are no defenses, counterclaims, offsets, cross-complaints, claims or demands of any kind or nature whatsoever to or against Lender or the terms and provisions of or the obligations of such Debtor under the Loan Documents and the other agreements, instruments and documents evidencing, securing, governing, guaranteeing or pertaining thereto, and that such Debtor has no right to seek affirmative relief or damages of any kind or nature from Lender. To the extent any such defenses, counterclaims, offsets, cross-complaints, claims, demands or rights exist, such Debtor hereby waives, and hereby knowingly and voluntarily releases and forever discharges Lender and its predecessors, officers, directors, agents, attorneys, employees, successors and assigns, from all possible claims, demands, actions, causes of action, defenses, counterclaims, offsets, cross-complaints, damages, costs, expenses and liabilities whatsoever, whether known or unknown, such waiver and release being with full knowledge and understanding of the circumstances and effects of such waiver and release and after having consulted legal counsel with respect thereto.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 1929 execution of his father’s uncle as evidence of violence against family members. He indicated that since the 1970s, Baptists in Georgia have been prohibited from baptizing people in a local river, but they continued to baptize in a pool in church. Later, he testified that they now meet in private homes. He testified that he was never baptized and that he attended services infrequently in Georgia. Aside from vague allegations that as a child during the communist regime he was treated poorly on account of his family’s beliefs, Krasno-pivtsev has not introduced any evidence that he suffered any specific harm on account of his religious beliefs since 1991 or that there exists a pattern of family persecution that is linked to him. See Nyonzele v. INS, 83 F.3d 975, 983 (8th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, there is no evidence that any Options: A. holding that no wellfounded fear was established where the attacks on family members failed to show a pattern of persecution tied to the petitioners B. holding that absent a pattern of persecution linked to the applicant persecution of family members is insufficient to demonstrate a wellfounded fear of persecution C. holding that such a report provided substantial evidence to support the conclusion that petitioner failed to demonstrate a wellfounded fear of future persecution D. holding that to show an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution an applicant must establish that he would be singled out for persecution or that there was a pattern or practice of persecution of similarlysituated individuals E. holding that absent past persecution an alien can demonstrate eligibility for asylum based on a wellfounded fear of future persecution by demonstrating that he or she subjectively fears persecution and that this fear is objectively reasonable

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that absent a pattern of persecution linked to the applicant persecution of family members is insufficient to demonstrate a wellfounded fear of persecution
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event of your termination of employment prior to the end of the Measuring Period, other than by reason of death, Disability (as defined in Appendix A to this Agreement), Retirement (as defined in Appendix A to this Agreement), or involuntary termination without Cause (as defined in Appendix A to this Agreement), all of your Performance Shares and rights to payment of any Shares shall be immediately and irrevocably forfeited. In the event of your termination of employment prior to the end of the Measuring Period by reason of Disability, Retirement, or involuntary termination without Cause, you shall be entitled to receive, after the end of the Measuring Period, the number of Shares determined by the Committee pursuant to this Agreement, but prorated for your active service time with the Company during the Measuring Period, provided, however, in the event of your involuntary termination without Cause, that you have signed a general release and non-competition/non-solicitation agreement provided to you by the Company at that time. In the event of your death prior to the end of the Measuring Period, your estate shall be entitled to receive, within a practicable time after your death, payment of the Performance Shares at the threshold performance level, but prorated for your active service time with the Company during the Measuring Period.

assistant: Forfeitures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Loan Parties have filed all Federal, state and other material tax returns and reports required to be filed, and have paid all Federal, state and other material taxes, assessments, fees and other governmental charges levied or imposed upon them or their properties, income or assets otherwise due and payable, except those which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted and for which adequate reserves have been provided in accordance with GAAP. To the knowledge of Borrower, there is no proposed tax assessment against any Loan Party that would, if made, have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: pleaded a claim under the NJCFA, the facts, as alleged, tell another story. As noted above, to fall under the purview of the NJCFA the “merchandise” must be offered “directly or indirectly to the public for sale.” N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:8 — 1(c) (emphasis added). New Jersey courts have indicated that “ ‘the public,’ as used in the this definition of ‘merchandise,’ refers to ‘the public at large.’ ” Princeton Healthcare Sys. v. Netsmart New York, Inc., 422 N.J.Super. 467, 473, 29 A.3d 361 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.2011) (quoting Finderne Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Barrett, 402 N.J.Super. 546, 570, 955 A.2d 940 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.2008); Marascio v. Campanella, 298 N.J.Super. 491, 499, 689 A.2d 852 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1997)) (citing Kugler v. Romain, 58 N.J. 522, 536, 279 A.2d 640 (1971) (<HOLDING>); 539 Absecon Blvd., L.L. C. v. Shan Options: A. holding that equitable estoppel requires proof of fraud misrepresentation or affirmative deception B. holding that the act provides the exclusive procedures and remedies for common law causes of action based on allegations of deception fraud and misrepresentation C. holding that a debtor has primarily consumer debts if the aggregate amount of consumer debt is more than 50 of the total debt D. recognizing that the njcfa is directed primarily at deception misrepresentation and unconscionable practices engaged in by professional sellers seeking mass distribution of many types of consumer goods E. holding that defendant had engaged in deceptive practices in violation of the njcfa by violating the new jersey administrative code

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing that the njcfa is directed primarily at deception misrepresentation and unconscionable practices engaged in by professional sellers seeking mass distribution of many types of consumer goods
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Where this Indenture provides for notice to Holders of any event, such notice shall be sufficiently given (unless otherwise herein expressly provided) if in writing and mailed, first class postage prepaid, or by overnight air courier guaranteeing next day delivery, to each Holder affected by such event, at such Holder’s address as it appears in the Note Register, not later than the latest date, and not earlier than the earliest date, prescribed for the giving of such notice. In any case where notice to Holders is given by mail, neither the failure to mail such notice, nor any defect in any notice so mailed, to any particular Holder shall affect the sufficiency of such notice with respect to other Holders.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Committee may amend, alter, modify, suspend or terminate the Award Notice or this Agreement at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part. Termination of this Agreement shall be subject to the consideration of the effects thereof under Section 409A of the Code.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the rights and obligations hereunder shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, and shall also bind and inure to the benefit of any successor of the Company by merger or consolidation or any assignee of all or substantially all of its properties.

assistant: Binding Effects
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: None of the Administrative Agent or any Lender shall disclose any Confidential Information to any other Person without the consent of PPG, other than (a) to the Administrative Agent’s or such Lender’s Affiliates and their officers, directors, employees, agents and advisors; (b) as contemplated by Section 9.07(f), to actual or prospective assignees and participants, or to any direct or indirect contractual counterparties (or the professional advisors thereto) to any swap or derivative transaction relating to the Borrowers and their obligations ( provided , such assignees, participants, counterparties and advisors are advised of and agree to be bound by either the provisions of this Section 9.08 or other provisions at least as restrictive as this Section 9.08) in each case only on a confidential need-to-know basis; (c) as required by any law, rule or regulation or judicial process; (d) as requested or required by any state, federal or foreign authority or examiner regulating banks or banking or financial institutions (including any self-regulatory authority); (e) to any other party hereto; (f) in connection with any suit, action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any other Loan Document or the enforcement of its rights hereunder or thereunder; (g) with the consent of PPG; (h) to the extent such Confidential Information (i) becomes publicly available other than as a result of a breach of this Section 9.08, (ii) is available to the Administrative Agent or any Lender on a non-confidential basis prior to disclosure by a Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or (iii) becomes available to the Administrative Agent, any Lender, or any of their respective Affiliates on a non-confidential basis from a source other than a Borrower; and (i) on a confidential basis to (x) any rating agency in connection with rating a Borrower or its Subsidiaries or the Advances, (y) the CUSIP Service Bureau or any similar agency in connection with the issuance and monitoring of CUSIP numbers with respect to the Advances or (z) data service providers, including league table providers, that serve the lending industry.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: On the Closing Date, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein, substantially concurrent with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the parties hereto, the Company agrees to sell, and the Purchasers, severally and not jointly, agree to purchase, up to an aggregate of $3,360,000 in Principal Amount of the Debentures (corresponding to an aggregate Subscription Amount of up to $3,000,000). At the Closing, each Purchaser shall deliver to the Company, via wire transfer or a certified check, immediately available funds equal to such Purchaser’s Subscription Amount as set forth on the signature page hereto executed by such Purchaser, and the Company shall deliver to each Purchaser its respective Debenture and shares of Preferred Stock, as determined pursuant to Section 2.2(a), and the Company and each Purchaser shall deliver the other items set forth in Section 2.2 deliverable at the Closing. Upon satisfaction of the covenants and conditions set forth in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 for the Closing, the Closing shall occur at the offices of EGS or such other location as the parties shall mutually agree.

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower hereby represents that it has dealt with no financial advisors, brokers, underwriters, placement agents, agents or finders in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement other than J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Borrower hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Lender harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, costs and expenses of any kind (including Lender’s attorneys’ fees and expenses) in any way relating to or arising from a claim by any Person that such Person acted on behalf of Borrower or Lender in connection with the transactions contemplated herein. The provisions of this Section 9.20 shall survive the expiration and termination of this Agreement and the payment of the Debt.

assistant: Brokers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and Plaintiff was in the process of moving to a new apartment. Defendants state that Officer O’Brien had probable cause to arrest Plaintiff based on the backed up bathtub; the gas in the apartment not working correctly; old food in the sink and around the apartment; razor blades and cigarette butts on the floor; very little food in the refrigerator and cupboards; the “vicious” pit bull with access into the kitchen; and Plaintiffs and her son’s ages. “A police officer violates an arrestee’s clearly established Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable seizure if he or she makes a warrantless arrest without probable cause.” See Olsen v. Layton Mills Mall, 312 F.3d 1304, 1312 (10th Cir.2002) (citing Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 7, 105 S.Ct. 1694, 85 L.Ed.2d 1 (1 (7th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>). The Court, therefore, must determine whether Options: A. holding that the clear and convincing standard must apply in terminating the parentchild relationship after the children have been adjudicated dependent or neglected B. holding that it is in the interest of both parents and children that parents have ultimate authority to make medical decisions for their children unless neutral fact finder determines through due process hearing that parent is not acting in childs best interests C. holding that the bia correctly imputed a parents knowledge that she and her children were not eligible for entry to the united states to her children D. recognizing fundamental right of parents to care for their children E. holding there was not probable cause to arrest parents for child abuse even though the facts weakly supported an inference that the children were being neglected because the officer failed to question the parents medical personnel or other caretakers which would have provided information that the children were not being neglected

assistant: The best answer is E. holding there was not probable cause to arrest parents for child abuse even though the facts weakly supported an inference that the children were being neglected because the officer failed to question the parents medical personnel or other caretakers which would have provided information that the children were not being neglected
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: insurers. Plaintiffs contend that coverage is available under the Guaranty Act because the insurance policy at issue is not “ocean marine” insurance under the 1989 amendments to the Guaranty Act. Plaintiffs argue, alternatively, that even if the policy is “ocean marine” insurance, the amendments are substantive and cannot be applied retroactively. Plaintiffs additionally contend that the cut-through endorsement by EAIC is an “insurance policy” under the Guaranty Act because the 1989 amendment excluding cut-through endorsements from the coverage of the Guaranty Act is also substantive and cannot be applied retroactively. Defendant LIGA disputes both contentions and claims that coverage is unavailable under the Guaranty Act for the insurance policy at issue. III. CONCLUSI W.D.La.1987) (<HOLDING>). In an attempt to resolve the conflict, the Options: A. holding that a standard wcel policy with a maritime endorsement is an ocean marine policy B. holding that a standard employers liability policy is not an ocean marine policy C. holding that a professional liability policy provided primary coverage over a general liability policy for acts committed by a pastor during counseling sessions D. holding that the proceeds of a liability insurance policy were not property of the estate E. holding that the standard fire policy and a broader homeowners policy were so intertwined that the prescriptive period in the standard fire policy applied to nonfire perils

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a standard employers liability policy is not an ocean marine policy
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you have a subpoena to serve on amazon , please note that amazon does not accept service via e-mail or fax and will not respond to the subpoena .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: was an independent contractor. As an experienced reporter, Friedman controlled the manner in which the article was written— including the selection of a topic, research plan, and sources — without any guidance from the Voice. Voice editors reviewed the article only after Friedman completed a draft, and the editors subsequently made few substantive changes. Moreover, the terms and conditions of Friedman’s employment provide compelling evidence of his independent status: he did not receive a regular salary and was only paid for articles the Voice decided to publish; did not have a contract; did not receive fringe benefits; did not have taxes withheld; did not maintain an office at the Voice; and was not listed on the masthead of the Voice as a staff writer. See Nelson, 626 F.Supp. at 978 (<HOLDING>). By contrast, the Chaikens have provided no Options: A. holding at summary judgment stage that terms and conditions of authors employment established he was independent contractor B. holding that unverified complaints cannot be considered as evidence at the summary judgment stage C. holding that credibility determinations should not be resolved at the summary judgment stage D. holding that at the summary judgment stage there must be sufficient evidence on which the jury could find for the plaintiff E. holding that evidence of an employers 100healed policy was relevant to the issue of perceived disability at the summary judgment stage

assistant: The best answer is A. holding at summary judgment stage that terms and conditions of authors employment established he was independent contractor
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: all disputes arising under the terms between you and under armour will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in your place of domicile , or the courts located in the netherlands , and you and we hereby submit to the personal jurisdiction and venue of these courts .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: exclusion. Absent such an indication, this court will not intervene to rewrite the contract. Despite the opinion of the Washington Supreme Court in Kent, this court is satisfied that diesel fuel, regardless of the way it is “discharged,” “dispersed,” or “released,” is within the definition of pollutants in the insurance policy at issue. As to defendants’ argument that the policy provision “is intended to protect against outside pollutants and waste cleanup, not the effects of a pest control cleanup,” this court is satisfied that the unambiguous language of the policy excludes all pollutants and does not exclude pollutants based on their source or location. See Damar Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance Co., 856 F.Supp. 679, 682-83 (N.D.Ga.1993), aff'd, 21 F.3d 1126 (11th Cir.1994), (<HOLDING>) Even though the court is disturbed by the Options: A. holding as unambiguous under iowa law the insurance policys exclusion of coverage to any obligation of the insured to indemnify another because of damages arising out of a bodily injury to any employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of his employment by the insured B. holding it was not an abuse of discretion to exclude testimony C. holding that intentional acts do not exclude coverage under the occurrence language unless the injury was expected or intended D. holding that under georgia law similar language was virtually absolute and noting that it intended to exclude liability coverage for all liabilities arising out of pollution E. holding claim for injuries arising out of use of truck and not from negligent supervision excluded from coverage by auto exclusion in commercial general liability policy no claim that language in policy was ambiguous or unclear

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that under georgia law similar language was virtually absolute and noting that it intended to exclude liability coverage for all liabilities arising out of pollution
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Executive’s employment may be terminated by the Company during the Term as provided in this ARTICLE IV. Upon termination of employment, the Term shall end and the Executive shall be paid the pro-rated portion of the Salary accrued but unpaid to the date of his termination. The Executive’s rights under the Company’s employee benefit plans shall be determined under the provisions of such plans and/or applicable law and any payments due under such plans shall be distributed pursuant to the provisions thereof.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 2. As used herein, “Confidential Information” shall mean all information furnished by the Disclosing Party or its Representatives (defined below) to the Receiving Party or its Representatives, whether orally, in writing, electronically or in other tangible form, and identified as confidential or proprietary at the time of disclosure by the Disclosing Party or otherwise disclosed in a manner such that a reasonable person would understand its confidential nature, including but not limited to, information that is related to:

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: opinion issued on April 6, 2005, and issue the following clarified opinion in its place. Maurice Harris appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the order denying postconviction relief because he never appealed his resen-tence, and the holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactive. Harris was charged with attempted first degree murder with a firearm (Count I) and armed robbery with a- firearm (Count II). He was 15 years old at the time that the alleged crimes were committed. A jury trial found him guilty as charged. On direct appeal, in Harris v. State, 674 So.2d 854 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), this Court vacated the conviction on Count I under the authority of State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995) (<HOLDING>), and remanded the case with instructions to Options: A. holding that there is no crime of attempted felony murder in florida B. holding that attempted felony murder was abolished C. holding that the crime of attempted felony murder no longer existed in florida D. holding that attempted felony murder is a logical impossibility E. holding that the crime of attempted first degree felony murder does not exist

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that attempted felony murder was abolished
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive's initial base salary as of the Effective Date is $375,000. The initial base salary and any increase is defined as the "Base Salary." The Base Salary is paid in accordance with the Company's normal payroll practices and subject to applicable taxes and withholding.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the two-prong test set forth in Terry v. Ohio.” United States v. Nee, 261 F.3d 79, 83 (1st Cir.2001). “First, we ask whethe not have a key to the closet does not defeat standing because he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the room containing the closet. ORDER The motion to suppress is ALLOWED. 1 . Nearby, on Route 44, the Sheriffs office instituted a ruse called the Sugar Tree stop. A sign states that there is a drug stop ahead with drug-sniffing canines. When cars take the "Sugar Tree” exit, cruisers follow them in order to detect a motor vehicle violation. Once a car is stopped, if the inhabitants don't consent to a search, the car is held until a canine arrives. This practice has been heavily litigated. See United States v. Yousif, 308 F.3d 820, 827-28 (8th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Martinez, 358 F.3d 1005, Options: A. holding that the sugar tree checkpoint program violated the fourth amendment when officers operating the checkpoint were instructed to stop every vehicle that took the exit regardless of whether a traffic violation had occurred B. holding that the sugar tree ruse did not violate the fourth amendment when officers only stopped vehicles for minor traffic violations C. holding that fourth amendment rights of a passenger of a legally stopped vehicle were not violated by police officers instruction that he remain inside the vehicle during traffic stop after passenger repeatedly tried to exit D. holding that a traffic stop is valid under the fourth amendment if the stop is based on an observed traffic violation or if the police officer has reasonable articulable suspicion that a traffic or equipment violation has occurred or is occurring E. holding that probable cause to believe the traffic code had been violated rendered the stop reasonable under the fourth amendment regardless of officers subjective intent

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the sugar tree checkpoint program violated the fourth amendment when officers operating the checkpoint were instructed to stop every vehicle that took the exit regardless of whether a traffic violation had occurred
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: recover damages or funds from the State treasury. Ex parte Alabama Dep’t of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, 937 So.2d 1018, 1023 (Ala.2006) (“Sovereign immunity bars claims against State agencies on the rationale that a damages award against a State agency would result in a monetary loss to the State treasury.”); Lyons, 858 So.2d at 262 (noting that a party could not bring an action against a State official, because “[s]uch an action impermissibly seeks funds from the State treasury”); Armory Comm’n of Alabama v. Staudt, 388 So.2d 991, 993-94 (Ala.1980) (stating that an action against the Armory Commission of Alabama was barred by § 14 because a judgment against it “would adversely affect the state treasury”); Southall v. Stricos Corp., 275 Ala. 156, 158, 153 So.2d 234, 235 (1963) (<HOLDING>); and Moody v. University of Alabama, 405 So.2d Options: A. holding that a declaratoryjudgment action against the state that would affect property in which the state had an interest was barred by 14 B. holding that an action against an officer was not an action against the state because the relief sought would not take away any property of the state or fasten a lien on it or interfere with the disposition of funds in the treasury C. holding that 14 prevents the state from being sued and a suit against the state cannot be indirectly accomplished by suing its officers or agents in their official capacity when a result favorable to plaintiff would be directly to affect the financial status of the state treasury quoting state docks commn v barnes 225 ala 403 405 143 so 581 582 1932 D. holding that 14 prohibits the awarding of costs against the state as a defendant E. holding that 14 prevents an action against the state when a result favorable to the plaintiff would directly affect a contract or property right of the state

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that 14 prevents an action against the state when a result favorable to the plaintiff would directly affect a contract or property right of the state
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you decide to register through an sns , we will extract the personal information you have provided to the sns ( such as your `` real '' name , email address and other information you make publicly available via the sns ) from the account you have with the applicable sns and use that information to create your account .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and belief that the party’s actions were not in violation of a bankruptcy stay); Fidelity Mortg. Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 51, 57 (2d Cir.1976) (allowing imposition of costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees under civil contempt powers for acts which bankruptcy judge found were done with “knowledge” of automatic stay and “deliberate[ ]” disregard of bankruptcy rules regarding requirements for relief), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093, 97 S.Ct. 1107, 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Drywall Tapers, Local 1974 v. Local 530, 889 F.2d 389, 394-95 (2d Cir.1989) (knowledge of violation and terms of injunction required to hold party in civil contempt), cert. denied, [494] U.S. [1030], 110 S.Ct. 1478, 108 L.Ed.2d 615 (1990); see also In re First RepublicBank Corp., 113 B.R. at 279 (<HOLDING>); In re Brilliant Glass, Inc., 99 B.R. [16] at Options: A. recognizing power of bankruptcy court to impose sanctions on parties and counsel who willfully abuse the judicial process but not finding sanctions appropriate against debtor and his attorney for their repeated bankruptcy filings B. recognizing power of bankruptcy court under 105 of the code and bankruptcy rule 9020 to impose contempt sanctions for violations of automatic stay C. recognizing district courts authority to dispose of contempt action for violation of automatic stay of bankruptcy D. holding that 105 authorizes bankruptcy courts to impose sanctions for civil contempt to compel compliance with a court order or compensate parties for losses caused by noncompliance E. holding that section 105 grants statutory contempt powers in the bankruptcy context that may be used to award monetary and other forms of relief for automatic stay violations to the extent such awards are necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions of the bankruptcy code

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing power of bankruptcy court under 105 of the code and bankruptcy rule 9020 to impose contempt sanctions for violations of automatic stay
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: under Title VII, no tangible employment actions were taken against Ms. Kramer by Sergeant Benson. The United States Supreme Court defines “tangible employment action” as “a significant change in employment status, such as hiring, firing, failing to promote, re-assignment with significantly different responsibilities, or a decision causing a significant change in benefits.” Ellerth, 524 U.S. at 751, 118 S.Ct. 2257. “Tangible employment actions fall within the special province of the supervisor” and “requiref ] an official act of the enterprise, a company act.” Id. at 762, 118 S.Ct. 2257. The tangible employment action must have been taken by the harassing supervisor. Harrison v. Eddy Potash, 248 F.3d 1014, 1024 (10th Cir.2001). The conditions Ms. Kramer experienced under Serg .1999) (<HOLDING>). As frustrating as Sergeant Benson’s actions Options: A. holding that a transfer of job duties can constitute an adverse employment action B. holding that a change in work schedule and request that an employee perform two additional tasks did not rise to the level of an adverse employment action C. holding that change in work schedule and assigning less desirable job duties did not constitute a tangible employment action D. holding that the plaintiff has not established a tangible employment action because occasional rotation to less desirable assignments within her job category is not an ultimate employment decision E. holding that a change in job duties was not an adverse employment action where the new job duties did not constitute qualitatively inferior work requiring any less skill or knowledge

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that change in work schedule and assigning less desirable job duties did not constitute a tangible employment action
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Without limiting Section 11.4 of the Security Agreement, upon the payment in full of the Obligations and termination of the Security Agreement, the Administrative Agent shall execute, acknowledge, and deliver to the Grantors an instrument in writing in recordable form releasing the collateral pledge, grant, assignment, lien and security interest in the Copyrights under this Copyright Security Agreement.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Executive acknowledges that the covenants set forth in Sections 8 and 9 of this Agreement are just, reasonable, and necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of the Company. The Executive further acknowledges that if the Executive breaches or threatens to breach any provision of Section 8 or 9, the Company’s remedies at law will be inadequate, and the Company will be irreparably harmed. Accordingly, the Company shall be entitled to an injunction, both preliminary and permanent, restraining the Executive from such breach or threatened breach, such injunctive relief not to preclude the Company from pursuing all available legal and equitable remedies, and the Company shall be entitled to all reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in connection with the breach, threatened breach or any challenge to the enforceability of Section 8 or 9.

assistant: Remedies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As an employee of the Company, you will have access to confidential information of the Company and certain third parties and you may, during the course of your employment, create inventions, improvements designs, original works of authorship, computer software programs, trade secrets and other matters that will be the sole and exclusive property of the Company. You hereby irrevocably assign each such invention, work and matter to the Company. As a condition of employment, you are required to comply with the terms of the Company’s “Employee Invention Assignment and Confidentiality Agreement,” which is attached to this Agreement. We wish to impress upon you that the Company does not want you to, and we hereby direct you not to, bring with you or use on behalf of the Company, any confidential or proprietary material or information of any former employer or other third party. In addition, you must not violate any other obligation you may have to any former employer or other third party. During the period that you render services to the Company, you agree you will not engage in any employment, business or activity that is in any way competitive with the business or proposed business of the Company. You will disclose to the Company, in writing, any other gainful employment, business or activity that you are currently associated with or participate in that competes with the Company and that you become associated with during the period that you render services to the Company. You will not assist any other person or organization in competing with the Company or in preparing to engage in competition with the business or proposed business of the Company. By signing this Agreement you certify that your employment with the Company will not violate any contractual or other legal obligation that would prohibit or limit you from performing your duties to the Company.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: appellees’ pretrial settlement with Cathedral in the Pines church. A. Applicable Law and Standard of Review Chapter 33 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code along with the common-law guides the analysis of this issue. Chapter 33 applies to “any cause of action based on tort in which a defendant, settling person, or responsible third party is found responsible for a percentage of the harm for which relief is sought.” Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code ANN. § 33.002(a)(1) (West 2008). Furthermore, section 33.012 requires the trial court to reduce the amount of recovery if the claimant has settled with one or more persons with respect to the cause of action by the sum of the dollar amounts of all settlements. Id. § 33.012(b); see First Title Co. v. Garrett, 860 S.W.2d 74, 78 (Tex.1993) (<HOLDING>) The rationale for this doctrine is that the Options: A. holding the defendant responsible for the greater of the actual or intended loss B. holding that 9613f1 is the exclusive vehicle for responsible parties to obtain contribution from other responsible parties C. holding that where plaintiff by his own evidence shows two or more equally likely causes of the injury for only one of which defendant is responsible plaintiff can not recover D. holding that when a plaintiff files suit alleging that multiple tortfeasors are responsible for the plaintiffs injury any settlements are to be credited against the amount for which the liable parties as a whole are found responsible but for which only the nonsettling defendant remains in court E. holding plaintiff responsible for attorney error

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that when a plaintiff files suit alleging that multiple tortfeasors are responsible for the plaintiffs injury any settlements are to be credited against the amount for which the liable parties as a whole are found responsible but for which only the nonsettling defendant remains in court
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parties agree after the Closing they will, from time to time, upon the request of each other, and without further consideration, execute, acknowledge and deliver in proper form any further assignment and take such action as the Parties may reasonably require in order to more effectively carry out the purposes of and otherwise to comply with the true intent of this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: authority under IAC rule 201-10.11. II. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court. Roth v. U.S.S. Great Lakes Fleet, Inc., 25 F.3d 707, 708 (8th Cir.1994). Summary judgment is ap from outside source donations to satisfy those obligations without first providing an individualized hearing, ostensibly to determine whether the money is for an important purpose that should render it exempt from deductions. They contend that an across-the-board deduction- of twenty percent from all money entering prison accounts violates the Due Process Clause. We agree with the district court that inmates have a property interest in money received from outside sources. See Jensen v. Klecker, 648 F.2d 1179, 1183 (8th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>); Sell v. Parratt, 548 F.2d 753, 757 (8th Cir.) Options: A. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property B. holding inmates possess a constitutionally cognizable property interest in the interest earned on money held in their prison accounts C. holding that inmates have a property interest in their money D. holding that inmates do not have the right to the medication of their choice E. holding that inmates have no constitutionally protected interest in the wages earned while in prison

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that inmates have a property interest in their money
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The execution, delivery and performance by the Borrower of this Agreement, and of the other Subordinated Loan Documents to which it is a party (a) do not require any consent or approval of, registration or filing with, or any action by, any Governmental Body, except those as have been obtained or made and are in full force and effect, (b) will not violate any Applicable Laws applicable to the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any judgment, order or ruling of any Governmental Body, (c) will not violate or result in a default under any indenture, material agreement or other material instrument binding on the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any of its assets or give rise to a right thereunder to require any payment to be made by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries and (d) will not result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, except Liens (if any) created under the Subordinated Loan Documents.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The indemnity and contribution agreements contained in Section 9 of this Agreement and all representations and warranties of the Company herein or in certificates delivered pursuant hereto shall survive, as of their respective dates, regardless of (i) any investigation made by or on behalf of Leerink, any controlling persons, or the Company (or any of their respective officers, directors or controlling persons), (ii) delivery and acceptance of the Placement Shares and payment therefor or (iii) any termination of this Agreement.

assistant: Representations