flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement. A signed copy of this Agreement delivered by facsimile, e-mail or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Agreement.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: § 65B.51, subd. 1 (2000). Therefore, we reverse the district court’s grant of the motion for a determination of collateral source benefits and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Reversed and remanded. * Retired judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals, serving by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const, art. VI § 10. 1 . The Minnesota Court of Appeals has interpreted the phrase "the date of the entry of the verdict” to mean the date of the entry of judgment. Wertish v. Salvhus, 555 N.W.2d 26, 28 (Minn.App.1997), rev’d on other grounds mem., 558 N.W.2d 258 (Minn.1997). 2 . A nonpublished case issued by this court in 1996 directly addressed the issue we must decide here. See Kissoondath v. Ammerman, No. C0-95-1346, 1995 WL 756840, at *5-*6 (Minn.App. Dec.26, 1995) (<HOLDING>), review granted (Minn. Feb. 12, 1996) and Options: A. holding that the limitation act does not apply to claims brought under the clean water act B. holding that the limitation act does not apply to claims brought under the oil pollution act C. holding that tenday deadline applies to motions for a reduction in a verdict brought under the nofault act D. holding that 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and tenday appeal period applies E. holding 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and tenday appeal period applies and collecting cases

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that tenday deadline applies to motions for a reduction in a verdict brought under the nofault act
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, except as to matters under which the laws of a State in which a respective Facility is located, or under applicable procedural conflicts of laws rules, require the application of laws of such other State, in which case the laws or conflicts of laws rules, as the case may be, of such State shall govern to the extent required.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: You agree not to defame, disparage or demean the Released Parties (whether orally or in writing) in any manner whatsoever. You also agree not to encourage any other person to make any statement disparaging the Released Parties in any manner whatsoever. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall preclude you from making truthful statements that are required by applicable law, regulation or legal process. Company will instruct its executive officers not to make any disparaging, defamatory or demeaning comments about you (whether orally or in writing) and as of this Transition Date shall not reference you in any press release or other public document other than as required to comply with applicable law, regulation or legal process and at all times in compliance with this Agreement.

assistant: Non-Disparagement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: involved an audio tape of oral conversations between a criminal defendant and an informant. 65 F.3d at 224-25. In that case, the court held that the informant’s portions of the conversations were admissible to provide context for the defendant’s portions because they “served as reciprocal and integrated utterance(s), reasonably required to place [the defendant’s] admissions into context and make them intelligible to the jury.” Id. at 225 (internal quotations and citations omitted); see also, e.g., United States v. McDowell, 918 F.2d 1004, 1007 (1st Cir.1990) (“Nor can a defendant, having made admissions, keep from the jury other segments of the discussion reasonably required to place those admissions into context.”); United States v. Gutierrez-Chavez, 842 F.2d 77, 81 (5th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>) (internal quotations and citation omitted). Options: A. holding a tape of a telephone call was admissible because one party to the call consented to the recording B. holding that statements on tape recording were admissible for the limited purpose of putting the responses of the defendant in context and making them intelligible to the jury and recognizable as admissions C. holding that the term other papers as defined in federal rules 7b2 and 11 refers to discovery motions interrogatories and requests for production and admissions and the responses thereto D. holding that failure to file timely responses to a request for admissions renders them admitted E. holding that under certain circumstances statements on a 911 tape may be admissible as a present sense impression

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that statements on tape recording were admissible for the limited purpose of putting the responses of the defendant in context and making them intelligible to the jury and recognizable as admissions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to review the independent action of a probation officer which was directly contrary to the published guidelines of the U.S. Probation Office. Ms. Keenan cannot plausibly argue that her random, unauthorized and illegal conduct provides a basis for a legitimate or reasonable governmental interest sufficient to warrant the intrusion on Mr. Herring’s privacy rights which occurred here. It is true that violation of internal guidelines, or even state laws, does not undermine a qualified immunity defense where the constitutional right was not otherwise clearly established. See Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183, 194, 104 S.Ct. 3012, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984). Such violations may be considered, however, where they are relevant to the constitutional interest itself. See id. at 193 n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 3012 (<HOLDING>). Ms. Keenan’s violation of her own guidelines Options: A. recognizing state laws can be preempted by federal regulations as well as by federal legislation B. recognizing existence of two tests C. recognizing the existence of the special relationship D. recognizing the existence of the statecreated danger theory of constitutional liability E. recognizing that laws and regulations may bear upon the existence of a constitutional interest

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing that laws and regulations may bear upon the existence of a constitutional interest
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Criminal Justice § 3-1.2(b) and (c) (3d ed. 1993) (hereinafter ABA Standards) (“The duty of the prosecutor is to seek justice, not merely to convict.”). ¶29 It is well settled that a prosecutor may not make derisive comments about opposing counsel. United States v. Frederick (9th Cir. 1996), 78 F.3d 1370, 1379-80 (reversed for cumulative error including comments about defense counsel’s skill in confusing a witness and saying that defense counsel would ask the jury to consider bits and pieces of the evidence); Bruno v. Rushen (9th Cir. 1983), 721 F.2d 1193, 1195, cert, denied, 469 U.S. 920, 105 S.Ct. 302, 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984) (criticizing prosecution’s statements that defense counsel acted in underhanded and unethical ways); United States v. Rodrigues (9th Cir. 1998), 159 F.3d 439, 451 (<HOLDING>); United States v. Friedman (2d Cir. 1990), 909 Options: A. holding prosecutors statement that defendant and defense counsel were lying when they pleaded not guilty was improper B. holding that the prosecutors request that the jury send a message to the community was improper in the guilt phase of the trial but was not so flagrantly improper as to constitute plain error C. holding that the prosecutors statements that defense counsel had from the start been trying to deceive the jury and had told the jury what was flat out untrue were improper D. holding no error was committed when trial court held defense counsel in contempt in front of the jury though it would have been the better practice to reprimand counsel and impose the fine in the absence of the jury E. holding prosecutors argument that defense counsels goal was to keep evidence from the jury was improper

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the prosecutors statements that defense counsel had from the start been trying to deceive the jury and had told the jury what was flat out untrue were improper
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Asset Representations Reviewer will cooperate with and provide information to the Issuer regarding the Asset Representations Reviewer’s compliance with this Section 4.9 . The Asset Representations Reviewer and the Issuer agree to modify this Section 4.9 as necessary from time to time for either party to comply with applicable law.

assistant: Modifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Warrant Agent shall be liable hereunder only for its own gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith. The Company agrees to indemnify the Warrant Agent and save it harmless against any and all liabilities, including judgments, claims, losses, damages, costs and reasonable counsel fees, for anything done or omitted by the Warrant Agent in the execution of this Warrant Agreement, except as a result of the Warrant Agent’s gross negligence, willful misconduct, or bad faith.

assistant: Indemnity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: given effect. These cases allow for each employee or retiree individually to decide whether to consent to arbitration of his or her own claims. Pryner further indicates that where the employee/retiree and employer/former employer agree to arbitration, “there is nothing to prevent a binding arbitration.” Id.; see also Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 474 F.3d at 283 (finding “there is no real danger that Cooper would have to relitigate the same issues with individual retirees that will have already been arbitrated with the Union”); IDS Life Ins. Co. v. Royal Alliance Assocs., 266 F.3d 645, 651 (7th Cir.2001) (stating that dispute resolved by arbitrators was closed to further litigation by res judicata and collateral estoppel); cf. Meza v. Gen. Battery Corp., 908 F.2d 1262, 1280 (5th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). In this case, the arbitrator’s decision would Options: A. holding that a rico action by union members was properly dismissed where any financial improprieties occurred with union funds and directly injured solely the union B. holding that a prior suit and a subsequent suit between the same parties did not involve the same claim because the evidence necessary to sustain the subsequent suit was insufficient to entitle the plaintiff to relief in the prior suit C. holding that an injured former employees lawsuit was not barred by res judicata where he never authorized the union to represent his interest in a previous lawsuit over the same benefits D. holding that former employees lawsuit was not barred by res judicata by unions prior suit where employee was not a party to the prior suit as a former union member was not in privity with the union and never authorized the union to represent his interest in prior suit E. holding that there was abundant evidence to support the charge against a union member for helping organize a nonaflcio local union of a different name where the union member admitted at the hearing that he contacted local contractors for the purpose of negotiating a collective bargaining agreement for new union and serving as the new unions business manager

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that former employees lawsuit was not barred by res judicata by unions prior suit where employee was not a party to the prior suit as a former union member was not in privity with the union and never authorized the union to represent his interest in prior suit
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as expressly provided in Article 12, neither this Agreement nor any interest hereunder shall be assignable, nor any other obligation delegable, by a Party without the prior written consent of the other Parties; provided, however, that a Party may assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement without such prior written consent (a) to any Affiliate or (b) to any successor in interest by way of merger, sale of equity, or sale of all or substantially all of its assets provided that such successor agrees in writing to be bound by the terms of this Agreement as if it were the transferring Party and provided that such transfer complies with Section 12.3, if applicable. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and permitted assigns of the Parties. Any assignment or other transfer not in accordance with this Section 20.5 shall be void.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: apprised the jury of the need to find an affirmative act in order' to convict for evasion. In United States v. Fournier, 861 F.2d 148 (7th Cir.1988), the Seventh Circuit upheld a jury instruction virtually identical to the one provided by the district court in the Instant case. The district court in Fournier instructed the jury that the government needed to prove that the defendant “attempted] to evade or defeat a tax,” which required a showing that the defendant “willfully did some act” in- furtherance of an intent to evade his taxes. 861 F.2d at 151. The Sev enth Circuit approved this instruction, concluding that- “the phrase ‘willfully did some act’ is a fair and adequate- synonym for the. term ‘affirmative act.’ ” Id.; see also United States v. Mal, 942 F.2d 682, 686 (9th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). The defendant relies on United States, v. Options: A. holding that instruction requiring jury to find that defendant made affirmative attempt to evade taxes defined as some act willfully done did not amount to plain error B. holding that it was not plain error for the court not to give a self defense jury instruction where the defendant did not request one C. holding that failure to request jury instruction about manner in which evidence was obtained was not error and thus did not constitute ineffective assistance because defendant was not entitled to instruction D. holding that instruction that omitted elements of crime that defense had conceded was error although not plain error E. holding that when no objection was made to jury instruction evidence to support finding based on instruction should be assessed in light of the instruction given

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that instruction requiring jury to find that defendant made affirmative attempt to evade taxes defined as some act willfully done did not amount to plain error
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: or services. U.S. Search, LLC v. U.S. Search.com Inc., 300 F.3d 517, 523 (4th Cir.2002). For instance, “[ijmagine being forbidden to describe a Chevrolet as a ‘car’ or an ‘automobile’ because Ford or Chrysler or Volvo had trademarked these generic words.’ ” Retail Services, 364 F.3d at 538 (quoting Blau Plumbing, Inc. v. S.O.S. Fix-It, Inc., 781 F.2d 604, 609 (7th Cir.1986)). No trademark protection can be afforded to such marks because, “if a business were permitted to appropriate a generic word as its trademark, it would be ‘difficult for competitors to market their own brands of the same product.’ ” Retail Services, 364 F.3d at 538 (quoting Blau Plumbing, Inc., 781 F.2d at 609).; see also A. & H. Transp., Inc. v. Save Way Stations, Inc., 214 Md. 325, 333, 135 A.2d 289, 293 (Md.1957) (<HOLDING>). On the opposite end of the spectrum are Options: A. holding that irreparable injury exists in a trademark case when the party seeking the injunction shows that it will lose control over the reputation of its trademark pending trial B. holding that the continued use of licensed trademark after termination of franchise agreement constituted trademark infringement and breach of contract C. holding that the defendants reference to the plaintiffs trademark in the metatags of the defendants web page was a violation of trademark law D. holding that lprs are entitled to the protection of the equal protection clause E. recognizing that generic marks are not subject to trademark protection

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing that generic marks are not subject to trademark protection
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Guaranty may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Any counterpart delivered by facsimile, pdf or other electronic means shall have the same import and effect as original counterparts and shall be valid, enforceable and binding for the purposes of this Guaranty.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: you again. Shalom and blessings. It is this evidence that forms the basis of Brock’s complaint in this issue. B. Discussion To preserve • error for appellate review, a complaining party must make a timely and specific objection. See Tex. R.App. P. 33.1(a)(1); Wilson v. State, 71 S,W.3d 346, 349 (Tex.Crim.App.2002). Texas courts have held that points of error on appeal must correspond or comport with objections and arguments, made at trial. Dixon v. State, 2 S.W.3d 263, 273 (Tex.Crim.App.1998); see Wright v. State, 154 S.W.3d 235, 241 (TexApp. — Texarkana 2005, pet. ref'd). “Where a trial objection does not comport with the issue raised on appeal, the appellant has preserved nothing for review.” Wright, 154 S.W.3d at 241; see Resendiz v. State, 112 S.W.3d 541, 547 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (<HOLDING>); Ibarra v. State, 11 S.W.3d 189, 197 Options: A. holding that an issue was not preserved for appellate review because appellants trial objection does not comport with the issue he raised on appeal B. holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review C. holding that an issue is preserved for appeal where the issue was sufficiently raised for the court to rule on it D. holding that the complaint on appeal must comport with the trial objection E. holding an issue not raised to the family court is not preserved for appellate review

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that an issue was not preserved for appellate review because appellants trial objection does not comport with the issue he raised on appeal
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties named herein and their respective successors and permitted assigns. No Party may assign either this Agreement or any of its rights, interests, or obligations, in each case, hereunder without the prior written approval of the other Party.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Incremental Facility will become effective pursuant to an amendment (each, an “ Incremental Amendment ”) to this Agreement and, as appropriate, the other Credit Documents, executed by the Borrower, each Person providing such Incremental Facility and the Administrative Agent. Incremental Amendments may, without the consent of any other Lenders, effect such amendments to this Agreement and the other Credit Documents as may be necessary or appropriate, in the reasonable good faith opinion of the Administrative Agent and the Borrower, to effect the provisions of this Section 2.24. An Incremental Amendment may at the election of the Borrower effect such amendments as may be reasonably necessary or advisable so that such Incremental Term Loans and the applicable existing Term Loans form the same Class of Term Loans or so that such Incremental Term Loans are fungible with other outstanding Loans, including by (i) extending or adding “call protection” to any existing tranche of Term Loans, including amendments to Section 2.11(d), and (ii) amending the schedule of amortization payments relating to any existing tranche of Term Loans, including amendments to Section 2.12(a) ( provided that any such amendment will not decrease any amortization payment to any Lender that would have otherwise been payable to such Lender immediately prior to the effectiveness of the applicable Incremental Amendment); provided that such amendments are not adverse to the existing Term Lenders (as determined in good faith by the Borrower). Each of the parties hereto hereby agrees that, upon the effectiveness of any Incremental Amendment, this Agreement and the other Credit Documents, as applicable, will be amended to the extent necessary to reflect the existence and terms of the Incremental Facility and the Incremental Loans evidenced thereby. This Section 2.24 will supersede any provisions in Section 2.17 or 10.5 to the contrary. The Borrower may use the proceeds of the Incremental Loans for any purpose permitted by this Agreement.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: From and after the Effective Date, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of [ the ] [ each ] Assigned Interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to [ the ] [ the relevant ] Assignor for amounts which have accrued to but excluding the Effective Date and to [ the ] [ the relevant ] Assignee for amounts which have accrued from and after the Effective Date.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and. expensive than the proposed single site solution. But the TCA does not offer providers the best or cheapest option. See generally Amherst, 173 F.3d at 15. Such a rule would effectively abrogate the local government’s authority to control the siting of wireless telecommunications facilities. In summary, Cellco’s proposed site was one of the most objectionable locations in Grafton for a 120-foot tower, and the Board gave Célico numerous suggestions that would receive favorable consideration by the Board. Thus, it is simply far “too early to give up on the Board.” Id. at 16. Cellco’s “one-proposal strategy may have been a sound business gamble, but it does not prove the Town has in effect banned personal wireless communication.” Id. at 15 (noting that sit upp. 47 (D.Mass.1997) (<HOLDING>). The Third Circuit has held that a TCA claim Options: A. recognizing such a claim under 1983 B. holding that a municipality may be held liable as a person under 1983 C. holding that a tca claim may be asserted under 1983 D. holding that a contracts clause violation may support a 1983 claim E. holding that a claim including a constitutional claim must have been asserted to the trial court to be raised on appeal

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a tca claim may be asserted under 1983
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: a genuine dispute as to the placement of a GPS device on his vehicle, the defendants personally involved in that action would be entitled to qualified immunity. Qualified immunity protects public officials from liability for civil damages when their actions “did not violate clearly established law, or ... it was objectively reasonable for the defendant to believe that his action did not violate such law.” Russo v. City of Bridgeport, 479 F.3d 196, 211 (2d Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted). In 2000, when the alleged conduct occurred, it was not “clearly established” that the warrantless placement of a GPS device on the vehicle of a parolee subject to electronic monitoring would violate the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Aguiar, 737 F.3d 251, 261-62 (2d Cir.2013) (<HOLDING>). Victory asserts no other colorable challenge Options: A. holding police officers warrantless placement of gps on defendants vehicle in 2009 fell within the goodfaith exception to exclusionary rule because such conduct was objectively reasonable under united states v knotts 460 us 276 103 sct 1081 75 led2d 55 1983 B. holding that evidence obtained in objectively reasonable reliance on a subsequently invalidated search warrant is not barred by the exclusionary rule C. holding exclusionary rule inapplicable to evidence obtained by police officers acting in reasonable reliance on search warrant later held invalid D. recognizing good faith exception to fourth amendment exclusionary rule E. holding that a court may not disregard the doctrine of harmless error simply in order to chastise what the court views as prosecutorial overreaching quoting united states v hasting 461 us 499 507 103 sct 1974 76 led2d 96 1983

assistant: The best answer is A. holding police officers warrantless placement of gps on defendants vehicle in 2009 fell within the goodfaith exception to exclusionary rule because such conduct was objectively reasonable under united states v knotts 460 us 276 103 sct 1081 75 led2d 55 1983
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (18 U.S.C. § 1956), dealing in counterfeit goods and services (18 U.S.C. § 2320), and interstate transportation of misappropriated property (18 U.S.C. § 2314). While all three of these crimes connote some element of dishonesty, they do not necessarily involve fraud per se. So, as a general matter, they would be subject to the general notice pleading standard. Rose v. Bartle, 871 F.2d 331, 356 (3d Cir.1989) (“Thus, the suggestion that ‘[a] charge of racketeering, with its implications of links to organized crime, should not be easier to make than accusations of fraud appears unwarranted.’ ”) For that reason, each would not be subjected to the higher pleading standard required of fraud. See Republic of Colombia v. Diageo North America, Inc., 531 F.Supp.2d 365, 382 (E.D.N.Y.2007) (<HOLDING>); see Muscletech Research and Dev., Inc., v. Options: A. holding that charge of money laundering need not satisfy rule 9b B. holding a complaint failed to satisfy rule 9b where the allegations were lacking in detail C. holding plaintiffs speculations did not satisfy rule 9b requirements D. holding that specific details about time place and substance of the fraud satisfy rule 9b E. holding a broad claim with no factual support was insufficient to satisfy rule 9b

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that charge of money laundering need not satisfy rule 9b
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither the Borrower nor any of Subsidiary is in default in any manner under any provision of any indenture or other agreement or instrument evidencing Indebtedness, or any other agreement or instrument to which it is a party or by which it or any of its properties or assets are or may be bound, where such default could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: however , if such a child wins , notification will be sent to the parent or guardian 's e-mail address ( provided by the child when he/she enters the contest ) .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: A.2d 173 (2007). 2 . To illustrate this point, compare two hypothetical casinos located outside of Philadelphia. Casino A’s GTR is $100 million and Casino B’s GTR is $600 million. Casino A would pay a lump sum $10 million municipal local share assessment, whereas Casino B would pay a $12 million municipal local share assessment (2% of its GTR). 3 . Again, compare two hypothetical casinos located outside of Philadelphia. Casino X’s GTR is $100 million and Casino Y's GTR is $400 million. Both casinos will pay a $10 million municipal local share assessment, but Casino X’s effective tax rate (10%) is substantially higher than Casino Y's effective tax rate (2.5%). 4 . See, e.g., Downingtown Area Sch. Dist. v. Chester Cnty. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 590 Pa. 459, 913 A.2d 194, 201 n.9 (2006) (<HOLDING>); Amidon, 279 A.2d at 53 (holding that the Options: A. holding that unlike the uniformity clause the united states constitution does not require equalization across all potential subclassifications of real property B. holding that entitlement to benefits is a property interest protected by the due process clause of the fifth amendment to the united states constitution C. holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution D. holding that the north dakota constitution is a document of limitations upon the state government unlike the united states constitution which is a grant of power to the federal government E. holding that the contracts clause article i section 10 clause 1 to the united states constitution does not apply to the actions of the federal government

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that unlike the uniformity clause the united states constitution does not require equalization across all potential subclassifications of real property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties recognize that if any provision of this Agreement is violated by the Company, the Indemnitee may be without an adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, in the event of any such violation, the Indemnitee shall be entitled, if the Indemnitee so elects, to institute proceedings, either in law or at equity, to obtain damages, to enforce specific performance, to enjoin such violation, or to obtain any relief or any combination of the foregoing as the Indemnitee may elect to pursue.

assistant: Specific Performance
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to Section 7(d) hereof, to the extent that any portion of any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, it will be considered deleted herefrom and the remainder of such provision and of this Agreement will be unaffected and will continue in full force and effect.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices hereunder to the Company shall be delivered or mailed to it addressed to the Secretary of Banc of California, Inc., 18500 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 900, Irvine, California 92612. Any notices hereunder to the Grantee shall be delivered personally or mailed to the Grantee’s current address according to the Company’s personnel files. Such addresses for the service of notices may be changed at any time; provided that written notice of the change is furnished in advance to the Company or to the Grantee, as the case may be.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: interest such that it would merit constitutional protection. 461 U.S. at 250, 103 S.Ct. 1741. Thus, I concur with the result and holding in this case that New Mexico did not create a liberty interest here because the state did not mandate a given result as a consequence of the state’s failure to comply with the notice requirement. I concur only because of my disagreement with the example proffered in dicta in a paragraph near the end of the majority opinion. 1 . In contrast, if the state "statute grant[ed] the parole board complete discretion in making parole decisions, [the statute would not] create a liberty interest.” Wood v. Utah Bd. Of Pardons & Parole, 375 Fed.Appx. 871, 874 n. 3 (10th Cir.2010) (unpublished) (internal quotation marks omitted); see id. at 874 Options: A. holding that revocation of parole does not impinge upon absolute liberty but only on the conditional liberty properly dependent on observance of special parole restrictions B. holding that parole is not a right in pennsylvania C. holding that habeas petition challenging the state boards decision to defer his scheduled parole release date was rendered moot by prisoners release from custody on parole and subsequent incarceration for violating his parole D. holding that texas parole statutes do not create a protected liberty interest under an older statutory scheme E. recognizing that it is well established that where a state provides a discretionary parole regime prisoners do not have a liberty or property interest in parole

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing that it is well established that where a state provides a discretionary parole regime prisoners do not have a liberty or property interest in parole
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 450 (Ala.Civ.App.2006), this court issued a writ of mandamus instructing the trial court to vacate its order granting leave for Envision to amend its pleadings in the case to add a new counterclaim, reasoning that “[t]he philosophy favoring finality of judgments dictates that Envision should not be allowed to amend its pleadings on remand to assert a counterclaim.” See also Eskridge v. Allstate Ins. Co., 855 So.2d 469, 473 (Ala.2003) (quoting Karagan v. Bryant, 537 So.2d 10, 11 (Ala.1988), quoting in turn other authorities) (emphasizing that “““the liberal amendment policy of Rule 15(a)[, Ala. R. Civ. P.,] [is not] to be employed in a way that is contrary to the philosophy favoring finality of judgments and the expeditious termination of litigation’ ” ’ ”); Karagan v. Bryant, supra (<HOLDING>); and Costellos v. Jebeles, 406 So.2d 393 Options: A. holding that a lessors interest can only be subject to liens arising from improvements performed on the leased property if the lease required the improvements or if under judicial interpretation the improvements were the pith of the lease B. holding that a defendant in an action to redeem property from a tax sale was barred from asserting on remand a counterclaim for the value of improvements made to the property C. holding that in determining the value of a partys nonmarital contribution to hybrid property under code 201073a3 the important factor is the value that improvements add to the property not their cost D. holding the aggregate value of the land and its improvements is the controlling value E. holding that plaintiff lacked standing after foreclosure sale to set aside the sale arid reinstate her right to redeem property based upon arguments that events surrounding the closing of the sale were improper

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a defendant in an action to redeem property from a tax sale was barred from asserting on remand a counterclaim for the value of improvements made to the property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, except that no DIP Loan Party may assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the Agent and each DIP Lender, and no DIP Lender may assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder except (i) to an Eligible Assignee in accordance with the provisions of Section 11.04(b) , (ii) by way of participation in accordance with the provisions of Section 11.04(d) , or (iii) by way of pledge or assignment of a security interest subject to the restrictions of Section 11.04(e) . Any other attempted or purported assignment or transfer by any party hereto shall be null and void ab initio . Nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, shall be construed to confer upon any Person (other than the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns permitted hereby, Participants to the extent provided in Section 11.04(d) and, to the extent expressly contemplated hereby, the Indemnitees) any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.

assistant: Successors
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of real substance that they ask about that I feel I just * * * shouldn’t do alone.” Both sides agreed with this arrangement. The question regarding how long the jury would continue deliberating cannot by any definition be viewed as a question of “real substance” and we hold that the court did not commit reversible error in concluding that the question fell within the scope of the agreement and in handling this question as it did. October 28 question at 8:18 p.m. The reconstructed record contains little information about this communication, and, as a result, Martin asks us to presume prejudice and award him a new trial. We have said, however, that we generally do not “presum[e] prejudice” merely because of a defect in the proceedings. State v. Dame, 670 N.W.2d 261, 266 (Minn.2003) (<HOLDING>). In another case where we addressed “private Options: A. holding that the district courts decision to delay jury instructions and deliberations did not warrant a presumption of prejudice B. holding that a thirtyminute delay in providing curative instructions to a jury for improper conduct did not result in prejudice against the defendant C. holding that the ninth circuit erred because the state appellate courts conclusion that one incorrect statement in jury instructions did not render the instructions likely to mislead the jury was not unreasonable D. holding that a jury is presumed to follow the trial courts instructions E. holding that the district court was required to give a supplemental jury instruction where the original instructions did not address whether there could be a conspiracy comprised of a single defendant and an undercover officer a legal issue that was key to the jurys deliberations

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the district courts decision to delay jury instructions and deliberations did not warrant a presumption of prejudice
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: A base salary (the "Base Salary"), at the initial annual rate of not less than Five Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($575,000.00) will be paid to the Executive in regular installments in accordance with the Company's designated payroll schedule.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As used herein, the term “ Real Property Taxes ” shall include any form of assessment; real estate, general, special, ordinary, unforeseen or extraordinary, or rental levy or tax (other than inheritance, personal income or estate taxes); improvement bond; and/or license fee imposed upon or levied against any legal or equitable interest of Landlord in the Premises or the Project, Landlord’s right to other income therefrom, and/or Landlord’s business of leasing, including, without limitation, gross rentals, taxes by any authority having the direct or indirect power to tax and where the funds are generated with reference to the Building address and where the proceeds so generated are to be applied by the city, county, state or other taxing authority of a jurisdiction within which the Premises are located. Real Property Taxes shall also include any tax, fee, levy, assessment or charge, or any increase therein, imposed by reason of events occurring during the term of this Lease, including but not limited to, a change in the ownership of the Premises or any other tax or assessment imposed in lieu of any other Real Property.

assistant: Definitions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: during the arbitration , the amount of any settlement offer made by you or spotify shall not be disclosed to the arbitrator until after the arbitrator makes a final decision and award , if any .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the Employment Period (as defined in Section 4 ), the Company shall employ Executive, and Executive shall serve, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. During the Employment Period, Executive may also serve as the Chief Accounting Officer of the Company as part of his duties as Chief Financial Officer if so directed at any time by the Board or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company for no additional compensation. In the event that Executive is directed to also serve as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer, he shall serve in that capacity during the Employment Period after receiving such direction unless and until such time that he is notified by the Board or the Chief Executive Officer that he shall no longer serve as the Chief Accounting Officer as of a specified effective date, such as, for example and without limitation, the Company’s decision to hire another employee to serve as its Chief Accounting Officer. Executive hereby understands, confirms and agrees that for all, or any part of, the Employment Period, Executive may also assume the role and duties as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer as a part of his duties as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer if he is so directed hereunder. During the Employment Period, Executive shall also serve in the same positions of employment with AMR as he does with the Company for no additional compensation. Executive’s principal place of employment shall be at the main business offices of the Company in Houston, Texas. Defined terms used in the Agreement that are not otherwise defined herein when first used are defined in Sections 6(d) and 10(d) .

assistant: Defined Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement constitutes the entire contract between the parties hereto with regard to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement supersedes any other agreements, representations or understandings (whether oral or written and whether express or implied) which relate to the subject matter hereof. The Board shall have authority, subject to the express provisions of this Agreement, to interpret this Agreement, to establish, amend, and rescind any rules and regulations relating to this Agreement, to modify the terms and provisions of this Agreement, and to make all other determinations in the judgment of the Board necessary or desirable for the administration of this Agreement. The Board may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Agreement in the manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or desirable to carry it into effect. All action by the Board under the provisions of this Section shall be final, conclusive, and binding for all purposes. Except as otherwise provided in this Section, any amendment of this Agreement that materially adversely affects the Executive shall require the written consent of the Executive.

assistant: Amendments