flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If representatives of the parties are unable to resolve the disputed issue through mediation, then within 10 days after the period described in Section 5.1 above, the parties will refer the issue to arbitration. The arbitration shall be conducted in Phoenix, Arizona by a single neutral arbitrator and in accordance with the then current rules for resolution of employment disputes of the American Arbitration Association. The parties are entitled to representation by an attorney or other representative of their choosing. The arbitrator shall have the power to enter any award that could be entered by a judge of the trial court of the state of Arizona, and only such power, and shall follow the law. The parties agree to abide by and perform any award rendered by the arbitrator. The arbitrator shall issue the award in writing and therein state the essential findings and conclusions on which the award is based. Judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. All expenses of arbitration shall be split equally by the Company and the Executive unless applicable law requires otherwise with respect to the payment of arbitration expenses.

assistant: Arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to respond to a request for admission would have ended beyond the April 30, 2001 date for completing the first phase of discovery. (Def.’s Opp’n to Pi’s Mot. to Recons, the Protective Order at 1-2.) The plaintiff has moved for reconsideration of the denial of his motions to compel and the granting of the defendant’s motion for a protective order. DISCUSSION Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and Local Civil Rule 72.2(b), a party may seek reconsideration of a magistrate judge’s ruling on a nondispositive, discovery dispute. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(a); LCvR 72.2. A magistrate judge’s ruling is entitled to deference and must be modified or set aside only if it is found to be “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a); Neuder v. Battelle Pac. Northwest Nat’l Lab., 194 F t *1 (<HOLDING>); Toone v. Federal Express Corp., No. Civ. A. Options: A. holding that any general deadline for completion of discovery facially applies to requests for admissions B. holding trial courts general charge concerning requests for admissions was a correct statement of law C. holding that a request for admission is a tool of discovery subject to discovery cutoff dates D. holding that rule 36 requests for admissions are not included within the parameters of a general cutoff for discovery in a scheduling order E. holding that requests for admissions are subject to discovery cutoff dates

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that requests for admissions are subject to discovery cutoff dates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 139 Va. 394, 124 S.E. 477, 481 (1924)). All of these versions of fraud share the common element of a false statement of fact. In the present case, Plaintiff has not alleged any statement attributable to Womack that was false. Plaintiff does allege that, “Defendants engaged in an aggressive advertising campaign throughout Virginia touting its self-proclaimed honesty and fair dealing to prospective consumers, including the Plaintiffs.” (Compl. ¶ 4.) While this amounts to an assertion by Defendants, it is not an assertion of fact. It is well established that such an expression of opinion “is no fraud.” McMillion v. Dryvit Sys., Inc., 262 Va. 463, 471-72, 552 S.E.2d 364 (2001); see ECA Local m IBEW Joint Pension Trust of Chicago v. JP Morgan Chase Co., 553 F.3d 187, 205 (2nd Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); Alpine Bank v. Hubbell, 555 F.3d 1097, 1108 Options: A. holding that five alleged incidents in four years were too few too separate in time and too mild to create an abusive working environment B. holding that false statements in a labor dispute that were injurious to employers reputation were not preempted C. holding that a plaintiff cannot avoid the securities fraud exception by pleading mail fraud or wire fraud if the conduct giving rise to those offenses also amounts to securities fraud D. holding that defendants selfprofessed standardsetting reputation for integrity were too general to sustain charge of fraud E. holding sanctions order was too general to support award

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that defendants selfprofessed standardsetting reputation for integrity were too general to sustain charge of fraud
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: removed the case to federal court. The state moved to remand on the basis of sovereign immunity. In a carefully researched and reasoned opinion, the Ninth Circuit concluded, as we do today, that “history gives little indication that sovereign immunity was ever intended to protect plaintiff states. Rather, it plainly understands sovereign immunity as protection from being sued.” 375 F.3d at 847; accord City & County of San Francisco v. PG & E Corp., 433 F.3d 1115, 1123 (9th Cir.2006). The Tenth Circuit reached the same conclusion in a state tort action removed to federal court, though it confined its discussion to the Eleventh Amendment, not broader principles of sovereign immunity. See Oklahoma ex rel. Edmondson v. Magnolia Marine Transp. Co., 359 F.3d 1237, 1239-40 (10th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). The Fifth Circuit and the Federal Circuit Options: A. holding that in statute authorizing suits against united states limits time period in which such suits may be brought united states retains its sovereign immunity as to any suits brought outside of that time period therefore court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over suit against united states that is barred by statute of limitations B. holding the eleventh amendment bars suits in federal court against the state of kansas or one of its agencies C. recognizing forum selection clause providing that no such claim shall be commenced prosecuted or continued in any forum other than the courts of the state of new york located in the city and county of new york or in the united states district court for the southern district of new york as clear and unambiguous expression of parties selection of exclusive forum in affirming district courts dismissal of action commenced in united states district court for the district of new jersey D. holding that eleventh amendment bars federal suits against state courts E. holding that the eleventh amendments abrogation of federal judicial power over any suit commenced or prosecuted against one of the united states does not apply to suits commenced or prosecuted by a state

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the eleventh amendments abrogation of federal judicial power over any suit commenced or prosecuted against one of the united states does not apply to suits commenced or prosecuted by a state
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: were deposited into the Debtor’s account and Krasoff diverted the monies intended to fund the Debtor’s operations — as KRD alleges— Krasoff violated his fiduciary duty to the Debtor, and the injury or harm that resulted from such misuse was suffered by the Debtor, not KRD, because the monies belonged to the Debtor. See Waghalter v. U.S., No. 76-H-1355, 1979 WL 1498, at *5 (S.D.Tex. Oct. 23, 1979) (“When the responsible person deposits personal funds into the corporate account, his funds become corporate funds...U.S. v. Eleven Million Seventy-One Thousand One Hundred and Eighty-Eight Dollars and Sixty-Four Gents in United States Currency, More or Less, Seized from LaOstriches & Sons, Inc., Defendant-in-rem, 2015 WL 630291, at *4 (E.D.Mo. Feb. 13, 2015) [hereinafter Eleven Million ] (<HOLDING>). It may well be that Krasoffs embezzlement of Options: A. holding that a corporation exists as an entity apart from its shareholders even where the corporation has but one shareholder the general proposition of corporate identity apart from its shareholders leads us to conclude in accordance with decisions from other jurisdictions that the attorneys client is the corporation and not the shareholders B. recognizing privilege for corporate officers directors and shareholders to influence the actions of their corporation C. holding that individual shareholders of a corporation could disregard the corporate form and assert that a loan made to their corporation was usurious where the lender insisted that the shareholders incorporate an entity to receive the proceedseven though the proceeds were for the individual shareholders benefitsolely to avoid the lower usury rate for individual borrowers D. holding that claims of corporation vest in corporation E. holding that the funds in the privatelyheld corporations account belonged to the corporation not to the individuals who owned the corporation and expressly stating that directors officers and shareholders of a corporation do not have standing to claim an ownership interest in corporate property in their individual capacities they must state a claim in the corporate name

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the funds in the privatelyheld corporations account belonged to the corporation not to the individuals who owned the corporation and expressly stating that directors officers and shareholders of a corporation do not have standing to claim an ownership interest in corporate property in their individual capacities they must state a claim in the corporate name
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Selten will indemnify, hold harmless, and defend all Stanford Indemnitees against any claim of any kind arising out of or related to the exercise of any rights granted Selten under this Agreement or the breach of this Agreement by Selten.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Date ”: the earlier of (a) November 14, 2018 or any later date to which the Termination Date shall have been extended pursuant to subsection 2.8(d) hereof and (b) the date the Commitments are terminated as provided herein.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in New Jersey for alleged diversion of payments despite the contractual provision shielding Wiggins from liability if the annuity issuer refused to honor the assignment, and including a claim for punitive damages without any good faith basis in fact or law. Under the statute, the Court finds Plaintiffs are allowed to recover the statutory penalty of $1,000 for each discrete violation of the ICPA, for a total of $6,000. United States v. Reader’s Digest Assoc., Inc., 662 F.2d 955, 966 (3rd Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 908, 102 S.Ct. 1253, 71 L.Ed.2d 446 (1982) (in construing the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, each deceptive solicitation sent to individual consumers in a mass mailing was deemed a separate violation); In re Barker, 251 B.R. 250, 266 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2000) (<HOLDING>). With respect to their common law claims of Options: A. holding that billings by the cruise line for port charges that were misrepresented as passthrough expenses but kept as additional profits is a deceptive practice under the florida deceptive and unfair trade practices act B. holding that statutory damages were appropriate for each discrete violation of that states deceptive trade practices act C. holding consumer claims under the texas deceptive trade practices act nonassignable D. holding that both punitive and treble damages were recoverable under the texas deceptive trade practices act because each of the plaintiffs claims resulted from a distinct act however because the plaintiff suffered only one compensable injury she could only be awarded one recovery for actual compensatory damages E. holding that proof of fraud necessarily establishes a violation of north carolinas unfair and deceptive trade practices statute nc gemstat 7511

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that statutory damages were appropriate for each discrete violation of that states deceptive trade practices act
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The execution and delivery of this Guaranty by Guarantor, and the performance of transactions contemplated hereunder do not and will not (i) conflict with or violate any Legal Requirements or any governmental statutes, laws, rules, orders, regulations, ordinances, judgments, decrees and injunctions of Governmental Authorities (including Environmental Laws) affecting Guarantor or any of its assets or property, (ii) conflict with, result in a breach of, or constitute a default (including any circumstance or event that would be a default but for the lack of due notice or lapse of time or both) under any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any of Guarantor’s organizational documents or any agreement or instrument to which Guarantor is a party, or by which Guarantor or its assets or property are bound or (iii) result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any of Guarantor’s assets or property.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each party hereto shall be responsible for any costs or expenses incurred by it in connection with this Agreement and the Transaction, including fees and expenses related to the negotiation, execution and delivery of this Agreement and the other agreements contemplated hereby and of its own counsel, accountants and other professional advisors; provided, however , that upon and at the Closing, Buyer shall be responsible for reimbursing the Sellers for (i) up to [****] Dollars ($[****]) in attorneys’ fees and related expenses payable in connection with the parties’ response filings or submissions under the HSR Act if the parties do not receive a ‘second request’ from applicable governmental agencies under the HSR Act; or (ii) up to [****] Dollars ($[****]) in attorneys’ fees and related expenses payable in connection with the parties’ response filings or submissions under the HSR Act if the parties do receive a ‘second request’ from applicable governmental agencies under the HSR Act.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of and by different parties hereto on separate counterparts, all of which, when so executed, shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall constitute one and the same agreement. Any signature delivered by a party by facsimile or other electronic transmission (including email transmission of a PDF image) shall be deemed to be an original signature hereto.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 193 (1942) (permanent or indefinite employment); Miller v. Riata Cadillac Co., 517 S.W.2d 773 (Tex. 1974) (indefinite employment); Cooper v. Vitraco, Inc., 320 F.Supp. 239 (D.V.I. 1970) (Virgin Islands law) (lifetime employment); Silverman v. Bemot, 218 Va. 650, 239 S.E.2d 118 (1977) (lifetime employment); Rua v. Bowyer Smokeless Coal Co., 84 W.Va. 47, 99 S.E. 213 (1919); Dow v. Shoe Corp. of America, F.2d 165 (7th Cir.1960) (Wisconsin law) (lifetime employment). 3 . In Easter v. Kass-Berger, Inc., 121 A.2d 868, 870 (D.C.Mun.App.1956), for example, a local trial court held that an employment contract for an express term of two years fell within the statute. This holding is entirely consistent with the conventional interpretation accepted by local courts. See Cooper, 365 A.2d at 629 (<HOLDING>); see also Farrow, 663 F.2d at 207 n. 29 Options: A. holding that at will contracts of employment are subject to tortious interference with contracts claims B. holding that the convention and us implementing statutes do not recognize an exception for seaman employment contracts and concluding that such contracts are commercial for purposes of same C. holding that asbestosrelated losses to building are intangible or incorporeal and are thus excluded from insurance coverage D. holding that if an insurer denies coverage based on an assertion that the underlying claim is excluded from coverage there is a presumption that the insurer did not suffer prejudice because prompt notice would have merely resulted in an earlier denial of coverage E. holding that contracts for an indefinite period are excluded from the statutes coverage

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that contracts for an indefinite period are excluded from the statutes coverage
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THE AGENT AND EACH GRANTOR HEREBY irrevocably and unconditionally submit, each for itself and its property, to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the State of New York sitting in the Borough of Manhattan, and of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York sitting in the Borough of Manhattan, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Security Agreement, or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment, and each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in such New York State or, to the extent permitted by law, in such Federal court. Each of the parties hereto agrees that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Nothing in this Security Agreement shall affect any right that the Administrative Agent, the Issuing Bank or any Lender may otherwise have to bring any action or proceeding relating to this Security Agreement against the Borrower or its properties in the courts of any jurisdiction. Each Guarantor irrevocably consents to service of process in the manner provided for notices in article 9 of this security agreement, and each of the grantors hereby appoints the Borrower as its agent for service of process. Nothing in this security agreement or any other Loan Document will affect the right of any party to this security agreement to serve process in any other manner permitted by law.

assistant: Consent To Jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 85 . See PL 56.1 ¶¶ 1-8; Treatment Documents from Dr. Elizabeth A. Greenberg, D.C., Ex. 7 to Meyerson Deck, at 2. Pinter's deposition only mentions cold and numbness in his hands, but a subsequent submission to the Court mentions "pain and serious discomfort.” PL 56.1 ¶ 5. In any case, a reasonable jury could infer that Pinter experienced pain in his wrists from Pinter’s description of the tightening handcuffs and from the fact that he later sought treatment for pain in his hands and wrists. See id. ¶¶ 5, 8 & n. 8. 86 . The Supreme Court has held that the need to detain multiple individuals in an enclosed space "ma[kes] the use of handcuffs all the more reasonable.” Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 100, 125 S.Ct. 1465, 161 L.Ed.2d 299 (2005). 87 . See Amnesty Am., 361 F.3d at 124 (<HOLDING>). 88 . I held in Pinter I that "defendants have Options: A. holding that gratuitous infliction of pain is unreasonable under the fourth amendment B. holding sbm is not a violation of the defendants fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures C. holding that the fourth amendment remedy sought is suppression D. holding that repeatedly striking a subdued individual would constitute an objectively unreasonable use of force under the fourth amendment E. holding that the fourth amendment right implicated in a malicious prosecution action is the right to be free of unreasonable seizure of the person

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that gratuitous infliction of pain is unreasonable under the fourth amendment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, together with the Change of Control Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto with respect to employment of the Executive, and terminates and supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings and representations, whether written or oral, by or between the parties hereto or their affiliates which may have governed employment of the Executive.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Loan Party, on behalf of itself and its predecessors, advisors, agents, Affiliates, directors, employees, officers, parents, representatives and subsidiaries, together with its successors and assigns (collectively, the “ Releasors ” and individually each a “ Releasor ”), knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally releases and forever discharges Bank, its respective predecessors, advisors, agents, Affiliates, directors, employees, officers, parents, representatives and subsidiaries, together with its successors and assigns (collectively, the “ Released Parties ” and individually each a “ Released Party ”) from all possible claims, counterclaims, demands, actions, causes of action, damages, costs, expenses and liability whatsoever, known or unknown, anticipated or unanticipated, suspected or unsuspected, at law or in equity, originating in whole or in part on or before the date hereof, which any Releasor may now or hereafter have against any Released Party, if any (collectively, the “ Released Claims ”), and irrespective of whether any such Released Claims arise out of contract, tort, equity, violation of law or regulations, or otherwise.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: as Greg Hollins, Greg Cash, Jerry Hollins, and Gowin. 2 Elem also appears in the record as “Elam,” and we will use the “Elem” spelling of his name in this opinion. , 1189 (3d Cir. 1992) (abuse of discretion); United States v. Sobamowo, 892 F.2d 90, 93 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (abuse of discretion); United States v. Zambrana, 841 F.2d 1320, 1329-30 (7th Cir. 1988) (abuse of discretion); United States v. Brown, 761 F.2d 1272, 1275 (9th Cir. 1985) (abuse of discretion); United States v. Alonso, 740 F.2d 862, 868 (11th Cir. 1984) (abuse of discretion); cf. United States v. Thompson, 210 F.3d 855, 859 (8th Cir. 2000) (treating a district court’s determination that necessity existed for a wiretap as a factual question reviewed for clear error); United States v. Diaz, 176 F.3d 52, 109 (2d Cir. 1999) (<HOLDING>); United States v. David, 940 F.2d 722, 728 Options: A. holding court of appeals role in reviewing issuance of wiretap order is not to make a de novo determination but to decide if facts were minimally adequate to support determination that was made B. holding that a court of appeals should review de novo a district courts determination of state law C. holding in the criminal context that a district courts obligation to make a de novo determination with respect to the portions of a magistrate judges report and recommendation to which objections are made did not require a de novo hearing D. holding that trial courts determination of facts has a presumption of correctness but trial courts legal conclusions are subject to de novo review E. holding that in the context of an arbitrability determination the court reviews the contract de novo

assistant: The best answer is A. holding court of appeals role in reviewing issuance of wiretap order is not to make a de novo determination but to decide if facts were minimally adequate to support determination that was made
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: or “injured” to bring suit. See id. at 121 (citing Connecticut v. Physicians Health Services of Connecticut, Inc., 103 F.Supp.2d 495, 509-10 (D.Conn.2000) (citing federal statutes with broad enforcement provisions)). At issue here is whether Title VII’s standing provision evinces an intention on the part of Congress to allow states to sue in their parens patriae capacity. The standing provision, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, authorizes civil suits by a “person claiming to be aggrieved.” A related provision defines the word “person” to include “governments,” “government agencies,” and “political subdivisions.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(a). When read together, these provisions clearly authorize the State of New York, as a “government,” to bring suit under Title VII. W 5 (D.C.Cir.1976) (<HOLDING>); Hackett v. McGuire Bros., Inc., 445 F.2d 442, Options: A. holding that a prima facie case of discrimination is not established merely by the number of peremptory strikes against blacks in cases where the percentage of blacks on the empaneled jury is higher than the percentage of the venire pool B. holding that white female had standing under title vii to challenge her employees alleged racial discrimination against blacks C. holding that blacks who were not subjected to racial discrimination had standing under title vii to sue over discrimination against other blacks D. holding that title vii proscribes racial discrimination against whites upon the same standards as racial discrimination against nonwhites E. holding that title vii precludes a claim under section 1981 for racial discrimination against a federal employee

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that blacks who were not subjected to racial discrimination had standing under title vii to sue over discrimination against other blacks
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Employee further agrees that, subject to reimbursement of the Employee’s reasonable expenses, the Employee will cooperate fully with the Company, its successors and assigns, and their counsel with respect to any matter (including litigation, investigations, or governmental proceedings) in which the Employee was in any way involved during the Employee’s employment with the Company; provided that such cooperation shall not unreasonably interfere with Employee’s employment with another employer or search for such employment after termination of the Employee’s employment with the Company. The Employee shall render such cooperation in a timely manner on reasonable notice from the Company.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: consider whether the appellee unions also have standing to sue.”). 28 . 176 S.W.3d at 772. 29 . Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811, 818, 117 S.Ct. 2312, 138 L.Ed.2d 849 (1997) ("The standing inquiry focuses on whether the plaintiff is the proper party to bring this suit, although that inquiry often turns on the nature and source of the claim asserted.”’) (citations omitted). 30 . W. Orange-Cove I, 107 S.W.3d at 584. 31 . Love v. City of Dallas, 120 Tex. 351, 40 S.W.2d 20, 27 (1931) (citation omitted). 32 . As standing to assert a constitutional violation of Article VII is a question of first impression, "we may look to the similar federal standing requirements for guidance.” Brown v. Todd, 53 S.W.3d 297, 305 (Tex.2001); Texas Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 444. 33 . Brown, 53 S.W.3d at 305-06 (<HOLDING>). 34 . See Clinton, 524 U.S. at 430-31, 118 Options: A. holding factor b is not unconstitutionally vague B. holding councilmans complaint was vague and generalized not personal and particularized C. holding 241 and 3631 not vague D. holding that term unreasonable noise was not vague E. holding facta was not vague and ambiguous and that defendants conduct was willful

assistant: The best answer is B. holding councilmans complaint was vague and generalized not personal and particularized
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In full satisfaction of all amounts due Employee including all amounts carried on Company’s balance sheet (“ Amounts ”) the Company paid Employee $720,415 (“ Indebtedness Payment ”) as of March 31, 2016.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: It shall not be a breach of the confidentiality obligations hereof for a Receiving Party to disclose Confidential Information where, but only to the extent that, such disclosure is required by law or applicable legal process, provided in such case the Receiving Party shall (i) give the earliest notice possible to the Disclosing Party that such disclosure is or may be required and

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: ... report, record or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness ... unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness. We have made clear that “[f]or the purposes of Rule 803(6), ‘it is immaterial that the business record is maintained in a computer rather than in company books.’ ” Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. Lozen Int’l, LLC, 285 F.3d 808, 819 (9th Cir.2002), quoting United States v. Catabran, 836 F.2d 453, 457 (9th Cir.1988). A logical extension on that principle is that evidence that has been compiled from a computer database is also admissible as a business record, provided it meets the criteria of Rule 803(6). Accord United States v. Fujii, 301 F.3d 535, 539 (7th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Potamkin Cadillac Corp. v. B.R.I. Coverage Options: A. holding that documents that were not created by but that were received maintained and relied upon by a business are business records under 8036 B. holding that the debtors deposit of funds was not in the ordinary course of business and was for the purpose of creating a setoff right for the bank C. holding that computer data compiled in the ordinary course of business and presented in computer printouts prepared for trial is admissible under rule 8036 D. holding that once requirements of texrevid rule 806b were satisfied mechanical accuracy of computer and skill of operator went to weight and not admissibility of computer summary of business records E. holding that letters addressing dispute that was subject of litigation and that were written in anticipation of litigation did not fall under business record exception under rule 8036 of the federal rules of evidence and noting that it is wellestablished that one who prepares a document in anticipation of litigation is not acting in the regular course of business

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that computer data compiled in the ordinary course of business and presented in computer printouts prepared for trial is admissible under rule 8036
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: TO INDUCE LENDER TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT, BORROWER IRREVOCABLY AGREES THAT, SUBJECT TO LENDER’S SOLE AND ABSOLUTE ELECTION, ALL ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS IN ANY WAY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE LOAN DOCUMENTS WILL BE LITIGATED IN COURTS HAVING SITUS IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. BORROWER HEREBY CONSENTS AND SUBMITS TO THE JURISDICTION OF ANY COURT LOCATED WITHIN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, WAIVES PERSONAL SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON BORROWER.

assistant: Consent To Jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: rulings by filing an appeal with the circuit court. Both parties moved for summary judgment and following oral argument, the trial court concluded that while Taxpayer’s hatchery qualified for the “subsistence of livestock” exemption, none of Pilgrim Pride’s operation qualified for the “farm” exemption. See W.Va.Code § 11-3-9(a)(21), (28). Through this appeal, Pilgrim’s Pride seeks review of the trial court’s ruling. II. Standard of Review Because the parties have stipulated to the governing facts at issue in this case, the only question before us is legal in nature-the applicability of two statutory exemptions from ad valorem taxation. Accordingly, our review of this issue is de novo. See Syl. Pt. 1, Appalachian Power Co. v. State Tax Dep’t, 195 W.Va. 573, 466 S.E.2d 424 (1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Syl. Pt. 1, Painter v. Peavy, 192 Options: A. holding that whether a statute affects sentencing is a question of law subject to de novo review B. holding statutory interpretation is subject to de novo review C. holding that interpreting a statute or an administrative rule or regulation presents a purely legal question subject to de novo review D. recognizing that the constitutionality of a statute is a question of law subject to de novo review E. holding that whether a statute has been properly construed is a question of law subject to de novo review

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that interpreting a statute or an administrative rule or regulation presents a purely legal question subject to de novo review
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and each other Loan Document has been duly executed and delivered by each Loan Party that is party hereto or thereto, as applicable. Each Loan Document constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of each Loan Party that is party thereto, enforceable against each such Loan Party in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by Debtor Relief Laws, by general principles of equity and principles of good faith and fair dealing generally applicable to entities such as the Loan Parties.

assistant: Binding Effects
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Second, Defendants raise the possibility that Venezuela law, rather than Ohio law, applies to the equitable estoppel theory. “[I]n FSIA cases, [the Court] use[s] the forum state’s choice of law rules to resolve all issues, except jurisdictional ones.” O’Bryan v. Holy See, 556 F.3d 361, 381 (6th Cir.2009) (internal quotations omitted). Under Ohio law, “if two jurisdictions apply the same law, or would reach the same result applying their respective laws, a choice of law determination is unnecessary because there is no conflict, and the laws of the forum state apply.” Wendy’s Intern., Inc. v. Illinois Union Insur. Co., No. 2:05-cv-803, 2007 WL 710242, at *5 (S.D.Ohio Mar. 6, 2007); see also Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 112 Ohio St.3d 470, 474-75, 861 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio 2006) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, the party seeking application of Options: A. holding that in cases of a false conflict of law a court may apply the law of the forum state B. holding that an actual conflict between ohio law and the law of another jurisdiction must exist for a choiceoflaw analysis to be undertaken C. recognizing conflict between prior precedents on whether jurisdiction is question of law or fact D. holding the existence of a possible conflict required remand for a determination of whether an actual conflict of interest existed and holding a new trial would be required if an actual conflict existed E. holding that atca establishes cause of action for violations of international law but requiring the district court to perform a traditional choiceoflaw analysis to determine whether international law law of forum state or law of state where events occurred should provide substantive law in such an action

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that an actual conflict between ohio law and the law of another jurisdiction must exist for a choiceoflaw analysis to be undertaken
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The unpaid principal amount of the Revolving Credit Advances shall, subject to the following sentence, bear interest as provided in the Revolving Credit Note. If at any time the rate of interest specified in the Revolving Credit Note would exceed the Maximum Rate but for the provisions thereof limiting interest to the Maximum Rate, then any subsequent reduction shall not reduce the rate of interest on the Revolving Credit Advances below the Maximum Rate until the aggregate amount of interest accrued on the Revolving Credit Advances equals the aggregate amount of interest which would have accrued on the Revolving Credit Advances if the interest rate had not been limited by the Maximum Rate. Accrued and unpaid interest on the Revolving Credit Advances shall be payable as provided in the Revolving Credit Note and on the Termination Date.

assistant: Interests
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: likely to result in his or her harm. By contrast, the acts of merely extending a plain invitation, or making a neutral offer to another person, which are unaccompanied by any inducement intended or designed to increase the probability that the person will accept, do not, in their most common understanding, constitute endeavors to “lure.” See American Heritage Dictionary, supra, at 675 (principally defining the verb “invite” as “[t]o request the presence”) and Webster’s Third International, supra, at 1566 (primarily construing the verb “offer” as “to present for acceptance or rejection”). Such acts simply do not involve the additional and extra element of powerful persuasion designed to influence the person to take action, which is the sine qua non of a lure. See Adamo, 637 A.2d at 307 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, as the legislature specifically Options: A. holding that an offer to compromise is generally not admissible as an admission B. holding an unaccepted settlement offer or offer of judgment does not moot a plaintiffs case emphasis added C. holding that a written offer accepted by parol may constitute a sufficient memorandum of the contract provided the person making the offer is the party to be charged D. holding that an offer to donate cannot be an offer to sell E. holding that a simple offer of a ride by a friend or neighbor does not constitute a lure as that term is usually defined as the offer is not accompanied by an inducement such as a promise of pleasure an enticement or prospect of financial gain

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a simple offer of a ride by a friend or neighbor does not constitute a lure as that term is usually defined as the offer is not accompanied by an inducement such as a promise of pleasure an enticement or prospect of financial gain
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you have more content stored in your onedrive account than is provided to you under the terms of your free or paid subscription service for onedrive and you do not respond to notice from microsoft to fix your account by removing excess content or moving to a new subscription plan with more storage , we reserve the right to close your account and delete or disable access to your content on onedrive .

assistant: Content removal, Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company agrees to employ Executive, and Executive agrees to be employed by the Company, for a period of two (2) year(s) beginning on the Effective Date (the “ Initial Term ”) After the end of the Initial Term and any successive Renewal Term (as defined herein), this Agreement shall automatically renew for another two (2) year term (each, a “ Renewal Term ” and together with the Initial Term and any other Renewal Term, the “ Term ”), unless either party gives written notice that this Agreement shall not renew upon sixty (60) days notice before the end of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All representations and warranties made hereunder, in the other Loan Documents and in any document, certificate or statement delivered pursuant hereto or in connection herewith shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the making of the Revolving Loans hereunder.

assistant: Warranties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, each party shall bear any and all expenses that arise from its respective obligations under this Agreement. In the event either party to this Agreement brings an action or proceeding for the breach or enforcement of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, whether or not such action or proceeding proceeds to final judgment, shall be entitled to recover as an element of its costs, and not as damages, such reasonable attorneys’ fees as may be awarded in the action or proceeding in addition to whatever other relief to which the prevailing party may be entitled.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The agreements in this Section and the indemnity provision of Section 11.02(e) shall survive the resignation of the Administrative Agent, the replacement of any Lender, the termination of the Aggregate Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all the other Obligations.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and any claim, controversy or dispute arising under or related to this Agreement, the relationship of the parties, and/or the interpretation and enforcement of the rights and duties of the parties shall be enforced, governed, and construed in all respects (whether in contract or in tort) in accordance with the federal law of the United States if and to the extent such law is applicable, and otherwise in accordance with the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within such State. Each of the parties hereto agrees (a) to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the United States Court of Federal Claims for any and all civil actions, suits or proceedings arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the Purchase contemplated hereby and (b) that notice may be served upon (i) the Company at the address and in the manner set forth for notices to the Company in Section 5.7 and (ii) Treasury at the address and in the manner set forth for notices to the Company in Section 5.7, but otherwise in accordance with federal law. TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY CIVIL LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PURCHASE CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Plan set forth herein is an amendment, restatement and continuation of the State Street Corporation 401(k) Restoration and Voluntary Deferral Plan, originally established effective July 1, 1999, as subsequently amended and restated effective January 1, 2008, and renamed the State Street Corporation Management Supplemental Savings Plan. This amendment and restatement reflects changes adopted by the Committee under the First and Second Amendments to the Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008. Such amendments are effective as of the dates set forth in such First and Second Amendments. The Plan is further amended to reflect certain administrative changes, clarifications, and design changes, which further modifications are effective January 1, 2014 unless otherwise provided herein.

assistant: Effective Dates