flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Obligor, each Obligor’s respective successors-in-title, legal representatives, and assignees and, to the extent the same is claimed by right of, through, or under any Obligor, their past, present, and future employees, agents, representatives, officers, directors, shareholders, and trustees, do hereby forever remise, release, and discharge each Lender Party, and each Lender Party’s respective successors-in-title, affiliates, subsidiaries, legal representatives, and assignees, past, present, and future officers, directors, shareholders, trustees, agents, employees, consultants, experts, advisors, attorneys, and other professionals (collectively, the “ Lender Group ”), from any and all manner of action and actions, cause and causes of action, defenses, counterclaims, setoffs, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, damages, judgments, expenses, executions, liens, claims of liens, claims of costs, penalties, attorneys’ fees, or any other compensation, recovery, or relief (including subordination of claims) (collectively, “ Claims ”) on account of any loss, liability, obligation, demand, or cause of action of whatever nature relating to, arising out of, or in connection with the Loan Agreement or any other Finance Document, including, but not limited to, acts, omissions to act, actions, negotiations, discussions, and events resulting in the finalization and execution of this Fifth Amendment or the Forbearance Agreement, as, among, and between the Obligors and the Lender Parties, such Claims whether now accrued and whether now known or hereafter discovered, from the beginning of time through the date hereof, and specifically including, without any limitation, any claims of liability asserted or that could have been asserted with respect to, arising out of, or in any manner whatsoever connected directly or indirectly with any “lender liability-type” claim.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The estate of a Participant who dies prior to the end of a Performance Period or after the end of a Performance Period but prior to payment may receive a Cash Incentive or prorated Cash Incentive. The method in which a Cash Incentive is prorated shall be determined by the Company in its sole discretion.

assistant: Death
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if the Optionee is Terminated by the Company (or its successor) without Cause within the 12-month period following a Change in Control, the portion of the Option that has not vested as of the date of such Termination shall become fully vested and exercisable as of the date of such Termination.

assistant: Change In Control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During Employee’s employment, Employee agrees to serve as Vice President of Land, whose job it will be to manage and lead the strategic direction of the Parsley Group’s land-related activities, and in such other position(s) as the Employee’s supervisor and Employee shall mutually agree. Employee will have the duties that are normally required of an employee of Employee’s same level and responsibility in the exploration and production business and agrees to perform diligently and to the best of Employee’s abilities the duties and services appertaining to such position(s), as well as such additional duties and services which may be designated by Parsley or other members of the Parsley Group, at Parsley’s discretion, from time to time. Employee will also, at the reasonable discretion and request of Parsley, advise and assist in other ways to further the business of the Parsley Group, as may be requested. Initially, Employee shall report to and be subject to the supervision and direction of Parsley’s Chief Executive Officer.

assistant: Duties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, all disclosures provided to RB regarding ESPV, its business and properties, and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, furnished by or on behalf of ESPV, are true and correct in all material respects and do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, taken as a whole and in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not materially misleading. To its knowledge, no materially adverse event or circumstance has occurred or information exists with respect to ESPV or any of its business, properties, prospects, operations or condition (financial or otherwise), which has not been disclosed to RB.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Meek covenants and agrees that he will keep confidential and will not repeat or disclose any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, or any of the negotiations which resulted in this Agreement, except to his legal counsel, financial advisors, and his immediate family.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “was before the Board when we issued our prior decision.” Further, the BIA held that because Maharaj was ineligible for asylum on firm resettlement grounds, the evidence of changed country conditions was only relevant to Maharaj’s withholding of deportation and Convention Against Torture (CAT) claims. The BIA concluded that the evidence was not sufficient to establish a prima facie case of eligibility for withholding of deportation or CAT relief and therefore reopening was not warranted. Maharaj timely appeals the BIA decision affirming the IJ’s denial of asylum and withholding of deportation. Maharaj did not challenge the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen in his opening brief and thus has waived appeal on that issue. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). II A finding of “firm resettlement” is a Options: A. holding an argument not raised in opening brief is waived B. holding argument waived for failure to raise it in opening brief C. holding that a partys failure to raise an issue in the opening brief waived the issue even though the party raised the issue in his reply brief D. holding that argument not raised in opening brief is waived E. holding that a petitioners failure to address the bias denial of a motion to reopen in the argument portion of his opening brief on appeal waived the issue

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a petitioners failure to address the bias denial of a motion to reopen in the argument portion of his opening brief on appeal waived the issue
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party’s obligations under this Section 3.01 shall survive the resignation or replacement of the Administrative Agent or any assignment of rights by, or the replacement of, a Lender or an L/C Issuer, the termination of the Aggregate Revolving Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all other Obligations.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: offer, which it did the following day. Both parties and their respective attorneys signed the agreement, further demonstrating their intent. to. be bound by the terms of the document. And the elated response. of Beverly’s counsel to Abbott’s acceptance further underscores the parties’ understanding that the handwritten agreement would settle Beverly’s claims. Beverly contends that the district court erred in relying on cases such as Elustra v. Mineo that involve oral agreements because the agreement at issue here was handwritten, not oral. , But Beverly fails to cite a single case to support this contention, much less explain wby the oral-versus-written distinction is relevant here. This failure amounts to forfeiture. See United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376, 1384 (7th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Forfeiture aside, our cases counsel that the Options: A. holding that appellate courts will not review undeveloped and unsupported arguments B. holding that arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are forfeited C. holding that an attorneys arguments are not evidence D. holding arguments first raised in reply brief are forfeited E. holding that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority are forfeited on appeal

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that perfunctory and undeveloped arguments and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority are forfeited on appeal
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The miscellaneous provisions set forth in Article X of the Credit Agreement apply to this Amendment. This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, and may be executed and delivered by telecopier or other electronic imaging means.

assistant: Miscellaneous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: rights shall be liable in a suit for damages.” Tower v. Glover, 467 U.S. 914, 919, 104 S.Ct. 2820, 81 L.Ed.2d 758 (1984) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 1983). As this statement makes clear, the party from whom damages are sought must have acted under color of state law. Therefore, the relevant inquiry in Yanaki was whether the private defendants (the only parties sued) acted under color of law. We affirmed the dismissal of the complaint because we found that the plaintiffs had failed to allege sufficiently that the private defendants had acted under color of state law because the conduct of the private defendants in obtaining the relevant court orders could not be attributed to the state so as to satisfy the first part of the under-color-of-law test. See Yanaki, 415 F.3d at 1209-10 (<HOLDING>); see also id. at 1211 (Holloway, J., Options: A. holding that the involvement of the police in executing the courtordered search without more does not convert the private defendants abuse of state law into conduct attributable to the state for purposes of 1983 liability and because yanaki and moss allege nothing more than private misuse of state laws their compliant fails to satisfy the first part of the color of law test B. holding that establishing the existence of an understanding among private parties and state actors for 1983 conspiracy purposes is really nothing more than another way to show state action by alleging a private partys connection to a state actor C. holding that private misuse of a state statute does not describe conduct that can be attributed to the state D. holding private actors are not acting under the color of state law for the purposes of section 1983 liability E. holding that to prevail on a 1983 claim a plaintiff must allege that the defendant acted under color of state law in other words that there was state action

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the involvement of the police in executing the courtordered search without more does not convert the private defendants abuse of state law into conduct attributable to the state for purposes of 1983 liability and because yanaki and moss allege nothing more than private misuse of state laws their compliant fails to satisfy the first part of the color of law test
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement embodies the entire and final agreement of the parties on the subject matter stated in this Agreement. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the Employer or the Executive unless made in writing and signed by all parties. All prior understandings and agreements relating to the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby expressly terminated.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Thus, the question for a jury would be whether the State provided reasonable accommodations resulting in meaningful access for Ms. Jar-amillo, or denied her such access solely on the basis of her disability. For the same reasons discussed above with respect to Ms. Jaramillo’s equal protection claim, the Court concludes that no reasonable jury could find that the accommodations provided by the State were unreasonable. Ms. Jaramillo had been quite successful in the past with identical accommodations, and several courts have made clear that the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act require only reasonable accommodations, not necessarily the particular accommodations an individual would prefer. See, e.g., Camarillo v. Carrots Corp., 518 F.3d 153, 157 (2d Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>); Wernick v. Fed. Reserve Bank of N.Y., 91 F.3d Options: A. holding that insurance policy that discriminated against the disabled did not violate the ada but did independently violate the unruh act B. holding that when an employer takes steps to accommodate an employees restrictions it is not thereby conceding that the employee is disabled under the ada or that it regards the employee as disabled C. holding that the ada does not require an employer to hire an assistant to help a disabled employee fulfill his work responsibilities D. holding that the ada requires fastfood restaurants to implement policies or procedures to effectively train their employees how to deal with disabled individuals but does not require a particular policy or procedure E. holding that an entity that serves the disabled lacks standing under the ada

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the ada requires fastfood restaurants to implement policies or procedures to effectively train their employees how to deal with disabled individuals but does not require a particular policy or procedure
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you do so , you acknowledge and agree that you : ( i ) would be in breach of these terms ; ( ii ) accept all risks and responsibility for such payment , and ( iii ) hold airbnb harmless from any liability for such payment ;

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: present case by admitting the photographs of Victim when he was alive. There no doubt may be instances in which a photograph of a victim while alive can have no legitimate purpose than to inflame the passions of the jury against a defendant, with that likely effect. But Garcia points to no particular circumstances in his case, or to any particular aspect of the admitted photographs, that necessa rison with the evidence supporting Defendants’ convictions, including the testimony of numerous eyewitnesses, experts, and investigators, as well as testimony that Garcia and Munoz each fired a rifle at Victim’s vehicle. Because the photos are not likely to have contributed to Defendants’ convictions, we conclude that reversible error was not committed. See Baros, 87 N.M. at 50, 529 P.2d at 276 (<HOLDING>). CONCLUSION {52} We affirm the convictions of Options: A. holding that prosecutors remarks were harmless in light of overwhelming evidence against defendants B. holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt C. holding that the admission of a family photo was harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence in support of the conviction D. holding that any error in admission of demonstrative aid was harmless because evidence of defendants guilt was overwhelming E. holding the error harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the admission of a family photo was harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence in support of the conviction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: do not have a contractual right to be called for any specific run. Roadway argues that the district court properly granted summary judgment because “skipping over” Weber when paired with a woman driver to allow another driver to take the run is beyond the requirements of Title VII. Roadway relies on several cases to support its position that an employer is not required to rearrange its schedule and force employees to “trade shifts” to accommodate the religious practices of an employee. Roadway maintains that in Brener and Eversley, this court relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Hardison when it held that forcing “trade shifts” to accommodate religious practices was not required by Title VII. Roadway further relies on Lee v. ABF Freight System, Inc., 22 F.3d 1019 (10th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). Roadway also asserts that business exigencies Options: A. holding governments position unreasonable where government advanced no legal authority for its position and applicable principle of law was long settled B. holding that an eightmonth delay without excuse was unreasonable as a matter of law C. holding that an over twoyear delay without any excuse was unreasonable as a matter of law D. holding that a plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of his claims with prejudice constituted a final order that was appealable E. holding that the plaintiffs voluntary runaround proposal of skipping over his position on the drivers dispatch board was unreasonable as a matter of law

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the plaintiffs voluntary runaround proposal of skipping over his position on the drivers dispatch board was unreasonable as a matter of law
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: if the producer intends it to be used for that disease or condition. FDA responds that “for such disease or condition” refers only to the uses included on a drug’s label. The statute does not unambiguously foreclose FDA’s interpretation. Because Congress has not “directly spoken to the precise question at issue,” we must determine whether the agency’s interpretation is “a permissible construction” of the Orphan Drug Act. Chevron, U.S.A. Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); see also Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sebelius, 595 F.3d 1303, 1315 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (applying Chevron). We conclude that it is. First, FDA’s reading of the statute closely hews to the text. See Abbott Labs. v. Young, 920 F.2d 984, 988 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (<HOLDING>). As the Fourth Circuit reasoned in Sigma-Tau Options: A. holding that the interpretation of statutory language should be consistent with the legislatures purpose and intent B. recognizing that deference to an agencys interpretation of the written law is appropriate only when that interpretation is within the written laws language C. recognizing that the government must demonstrate the reasonableness not only of its litigation position but also of the agencys actions D. recognizing that the reasonableness of an agencys interpretation turns in part on the constructions fit with the statutory language E. holding that stare decisis required the court to adhere to a prior statutory interpretation despite the agencys subsequent interpretation of the statute contrary to the settled law

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing that the reasonableness of an agencys interpretation turns in part on the constructions fit with the statutory language
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement has been, and each other Loan Document, when delivered hereunder, will have been, duly executed and delivered by each Loan Party that is party thereto. This Agreement constitutes, and each other Loan Document when so delivered will constitute, a legal, valid and binding obligation of each Loan Party, enforceable against each Loan Party that is party thereto in accordance with its terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to general principles of equity, regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law.

assistant: Binding Effects
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment shall be deemed to be a contract made under, and for all purposes shall be construed in accordance with and be governed by the Law (without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof except for Sections 5-1401 and 5-1402 of the New York General Obligations Law) of the State of New York.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Security Agreement may be executed in any number of identical counterparts, any set of which signed by all the parties hereto shall be deemed to constitute a complete, executed original for all purposes. Transmission by facsimile, “pdf” or similar electronic copy of an executed counterpart of this Security Agreement shall be deemed to constitute due and sufficient delivery of such counterpart. Any party hereto may request an original counterpart of any party delivering such electronic counterpart.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: None of Issuer, Co-Issuer, or Parent or any of their respective affiliates (as defined in Rule 501(b) of Regulation D) has directly, or through any agent, sold, offered for sale, solicited offers to buy or otherwise negotiated in respect of, any security (as defined in the Securities Act) that is or will be integrated with the sale of the Notes in a manner that would require registration of the Securities under the Securities Act.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: health and life insurance plans; and to provide appropriate payroll taxes for social security, unemployment and workers’ compensation. Hawley agreed, among other things, to devote exclusive time and effort to Appellant’s business; to operate in the territory assigned by Appellant; to main tain a certain level of liability and property' damage insurance; to maintain certain licenses and levels of expertise in applicable areas; and to attend and complete Appellant’s training program. These mutual responsibilities constitute a bilateral contract. To form a bilateral contract, there must be mutuality of obligation. See McIntosh v. Harbour Club Villas Condominium, 468 So.2d 1075, 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see also Balter v. Pan American Bank of Hialeah, 383 So.2d 256, 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (<HOLDING>); Mark Realty, Inc. v. Rogness, 418 So.2d 373, Options: A. holding that mutuality of obligation is essential for contracts based on mutual promises and that a contract is unenforceable where a party is free to perform or not perform the contract B. holding that a contract without a minimum quantity term is unenforceable for lack of consideration and mutuality C. holding a cancellation clause that releases both parties from their obligations does not render contract void for lack of mutuality of obligation D. holding mutuality of obligation is essential to the formation of a bilateral contract E. holding that a contract need not have mutuality of obligation as long as it is supported by consideration

assistant: The best answer is D. holding mutuality of obligation is essential to the formation of a bilateral contract
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND VOLUNTARILY WAIVE ANY RIGHT THEY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM OR CONTROVERSY BETWEEN GUARANTOR AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, WHETHER ARISING IN CONTRACT, TORT OR BY STATUTE, INCLUDING CONTROVERSIES OR CLAIMS THAT ARISE OUT OF OR RELATE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO THIS GUARANTY, OR ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT. THIS PROVISION IS A MATERIAL INDUCEMENT FOR THE PARTIES ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT AND THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Unless a clear contrary intention appears: (i) the defined terms herein shall apply equally to both the singular and plural forms of such terms; (ii) reference to any Person includes such Person’s successors and assigns but, if applicable, only if such successors and assigns are not prohibited by the Plan or the Agreement, and reference to a Person in a particular capacity excludes such Person in any other capacity or individually; (iii) any pronoun shall include the corresponding masculine, feminine and neuter forms; (iv) reference to any agreement, document or instrument means such agreement, document or instrument as amended or modified and in effect from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof; (v) reference to any law, rule or regulation means such law, rule or regulation as amended, modified, codified, replaced or reenacted, in whole or in part, and in effect from time to time, including rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and reference to any section or other provision of any law, rule or regulation means that provision of such law, rule or regulation from time to time in effect and constituting the substantive amendment, modification, codification, replacement or reenactment of such section or other provision; (vi) “hereunder,” “hereof,” “hereto,” and words of similar import shall be deemed references to the Agreement as a whole and not to any particular article, section or other provision hereof; (vii) numbered or lettered articles, sections and subsections herein contained refer to articles, sections and subsections of the Agreement; (viii) “including” (and with correlative meaning “include”) means including without limiting the generality of any description preceding such term; (ix) “or” is used in the inclusive sense of “and/or”; (x) references to documents, instruments or agreements shall be deemed to refer as well to all addenda, exhibits, schedules or amendments thereto; and (xi) reference to dollars or $ shall be deemed to refer to U.S. dollars.

assistant: Interpretations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: You agree not to disclose the existence or provisions of this Agreement to any person or entity unless the Company consents to such disclosure in advance and in writing; however, you may, without the Company’s consent, disclose that you resigned from the Company, make such disclosures as are required by law (including disclosures to governmental and taxing authorities and courts), and disclose the existence and provisions of this Agreement to your spouse and immediate family members and to your attorneys, accountants, tax advisors, and other professional service providers as reasonably necessary, provided that you instruct each such person that the existence and provisions of this Agreement are strictly confidential and are not to be revealed to anyone else except as required by applicable law.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: On each such occasion, no objection was made by defense counsel to appellant’s absence, and appellant, who was aware of the announced procedure for selecting a jury, witnessed the bench conferences, and heard the discussions concerning the challenged members’ qualifications and the judge’s rulings, remained silent. Appellant’s failure to voice any objection to her absence from the bench conferences, either directly or through counsel, constituted acquiescence to her absence. See Smith, 298 Ga. at 409-410 (2) (concluding that defendant acquiesced in removal of juror during his absence where he knew about the process by which jurors could be removed and was present when juror’s removal was discussed, yet he raised no objection); Heywood v. State, 292 Ga. 771, 774-775 (743 SE2d 12) (2013) (<HOLDING>); Wilson v. State, 274 Ga. 637, 639 (3) (555 Options: A. holding that the failure by a criminal defendant to invoke his right to be present at a conference which he knows is taking place between the judge and a juror in chambers constitutes a valid waiver of that right B. holding that defendant acquiesced in inchambers conference occurring in his absence when trial court discussed the subject of the conference and its ruling and neither defense counsel nor defendant raised an objection C. holding error if any was not preserved regarding questions proposed at bench conference but disallowed because the record does not reveal what was said at the bench D. holding that defendant acquiesced to counsels waiver of right to be present at bench conference where trial judge advised everyone in courtroom including defendant about the topic of the bench conference and defendant raised no objection to his absence E. holding defense counsel waived objection where he remained silent despite the district courts specific inquiry during a side bar conference whether there were any concerns about closing the courtroom to the public

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that defendant acquiesced to counsels waiver of right to be present at bench conference where trial judge advised everyone in courtroom including defendant about the topic of the bench conference and defendant raised no objection to his absence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If a court determines that any of the restrictions contained in Paragraph 5(a) or Paragraph 5(b) is unreasonable in terms of scope, duration, geographic area, or otherwise, or any provision in Paragraph 5(a) or Paragraph 5(b) is otherwise illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, then such restriction or provision, as applicable, shall be reformed to the extent deemed necessary by the court so that the same shall be rendered enforceable to the fullest extent otherwise permissible under applicable law, and the parties hereto do hereby expressly authorize any such court to so provide.

assistant: Modifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No authorizations, approvals or consents of, and no filings or registrations with, any Governmental Authority or any securities exchange are necessary for the execution, delivery or performance by Pledgor of this Agreement or for the legality, validity or enforceability thereof; except for filings and recordings in respect of the Liens created pursuant to the Repurchase Documents.

assistant: Approvals
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: At any time or from time to time upon the request of Agent, Borrower shall, and shall cause each other Loan Party to, execute and deliver such further documents and do such other acts and things as Agent may reasonably request in order to effect fully the purposes of this Agreement or the other Loan Documents and to provide for payment of the Loans made hereunder, with interest thereon, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: marshals arrived at the apartment where Charles was staying to arrest him, entered Charles’s armed-robbery trial during the State’s cross-examination of his alibi witness, Melissa Sulton, Charles’s girlfriend at the time. Sulton maintained throughout cross-examination that she did not know why the marshals were looking for Charles. Sul-ton also admitted that she knew authorities were looking for Charles prior to the marshals’ arrival because she had received a phone call from the mother of one of Charles’s other children that “the feds” were looking for Charles. ¶ 30. That no direct evidence was presented showing that Charles had any knowledge of the crime for which he was arrested, is of no matter. See, e.g., United States v. Hernandez-Miranda, 601 F.2d 1104, 1106 (9th Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added). What Mississippi law Options: A. holding that while other reasons might support defendants decision to take flight this in itself does not make a flight instruction improper B. holding that erroneous instruction that flight from the scene of the crime implied guilt was harmless because there was other evidence to sustain a conviction C. holding that although evidence of a defendants flight is admissible as circumstantial evidence of guilt it is improper for the trial judge to instruct the jury on the law of flight because such an instruction oftentimes has the potential for creating more problems than solutions as it places undue emphasis upon that part of circumstantial evidence D. holding that a flight instruction was to be given only in cases wherein that circumstance had considerable probative value E. holding that flight from police can help establish reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that while other reasons might support defendants decision to take flight this in itself does not make a flight instruction improper
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Not later than thirty (30) days before the date on which Abbott or any Affiliate or Sublicensee of Abbott shall, on a commercial basis, make, use, or sell any Products, and at all times thereafter until the expiration of all applicable statutes of limitation pertaining to any such manufacture, marketing, possession, use, sale of other disposition of any Products, Abbott will, at its expense, and Enanta will, at its expense, with respect only to Co-Developed Products, obtain and maintain in full force and effect, comprehensive general liability insurance, including product liability insurance and clinical trial insurance protecting the other Party, subject to Section 13.1 or 13.2, as the case may be, against all claims, obligations, liabilities, and damages, based upon or arising out of actual or alleged bodily injury, personal injury, death, or any other damage to or loss of persons or property, cause by any such manufacture, marketing, possession, use, sale, or other disposition. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Abbott may elect to self-insure with respect to any insurance coverage it is required to obtain hereunder.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Whenever the Borrower desires the issuance, amendment, extension or renewal of a Letter of Credit, it shall deliver to the Issuing Bank, with a copy to the Administrative Agent, an Issuance/Amendment Notice no later than 12:00 p.m. (New York City time) at least five Business Days, or in each case such shorter period as may be agreed to by the Issuing Bank in any particular instance, in advance of the proposed date of issuance. Upon satisfaction or waiver of the applicable conditions set forth in Section 4.02 , the Issuing Bank shall issue or implement such requested Letter of Credit or such amendment, extension or renewal only in accordance with the Issuing Bank’s standard operating procedures. Upon the issuance of any Letter of Credit or amendment, extension or renewal to a Letter of Credit, the Issuing Bank shall promptly notify the Administrative Agent and the Borrower thereof, in writing, which notice shall be accompanied by a copy of such Letter of Credit or such amendment, extension or renewal.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Grantee shall, not later than the date as of which the receipt of this Award becomes a taxable event for Federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator for payment of any Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld on account of such taxable event. Except in the case where an election is made pursuant to Paragraph 8 below, the Optionee may elect to have the minimum required tax withholding obligation satisfied, in whole or in part, by authorizing the Company to withhold from shares of Stock to be issued a number of shares of Stock with an aggregate Fair Market Value that would satisfy the minimum withholding amount due..

assistant: Tax Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During each year of the term of the Agreement, the Executive shall be entitled to three (3) weeks vacation annually, which, if unused, will accrue daily and shall be paid to Executive (based upon the per-day amount of the Base Salary for the calendar year in which such vacation is accrued and pro rated through the date of such termination) upon Executives termination or the expiration of the Term of Employment.

assistant: Vacations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If at any time an Event of Default with respect to a Party has occurred and is continuing, the other party may terminate this Agreement and deem the Expiration Date to have occurred by giving written notice to the Defaulting Party specifying the relevant Event of Default.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: All Confidential Information (including all copies thereof) shall remain the property of Discloser. All copies shall bear all proprietary markings contained on or in the originals. No rights or licenses to trademarks, inventions, copyrights, patents or any other intellectual property rights are implied or granted under this Agreement.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The “ Term ” of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date and, unless terminated earlier as provided herein, continue until the twelfth (12 th ) anniversary thereof, or, if later, the date that is thirty (30) days after full performance by SSN of any outstanding Purchase Order.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable such provision shall be construed by limiting it so as to be valid, legal and enforceable to the maximum extent provided by law and the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: point, the circuit court issued an order that read in part: Came on for hearing the Motion of SCI, INC., For Summary Judgment, and the Court, having considered and read the Motion and Briefs in support and opposition thereto, as well as all of the evidence submitted at the first trial that began October 2, 1995, and MDOT’s Supplemental Responses to SCI’s First Set of Interrogatories, and having heard and considered the arguments of counsel, finds and concludes that Plaintiffs Motion is well taken and should be granted. ¶ 16. A party seeking to recover upon a claim may, at any time after the expiration of thirty days from the commencement of an action, move for a summary judgment in his favor. Miss. R. Civ. P. 56(a). See also Soley v. Star & Herald Co., 390 F.2d 364, 367 (5th Cir.1968) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we hold that it was proper for Options: A. holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that a motion for summary judgment was not opposed B. recognizing the general rule which permits judicial notice of a courts prior cases to support a motion for summary judgment but reversing because in his order the trial judge made no specific reference to the basis for his grant of summary judgment C. holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that motion for summary judgment was not opposed D. holding that the trial court may not grant summary judgment on a ground not raised in the motion E. holding that a grant of summary judgment in favor of one party creates a final judgment allowing appellate review of denial of opposing partys summary judgment motion

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing the general rule which permits judicial notice of a courts prior cases to support a motion for summary judgment but reversing because in his order the trial judge made no specific reference to the basis for his grant of summary judgment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Purchaser has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and each of the Transaction Documents to which it is a party, and each Transaction Document to which the Purchaser is a party constitutes valid and legally binding obligations of the Purchaser, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except (a) as limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent conveyance and any other laws of general application affecting enforcement of creditors’ rights generally, or (b) as limited by laws relating to the availability of specific performance, injunctive relief or other equitable remedies.

assistant: Authorizations