flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan), the Period of Restriction shall immediately lapse with respect to all outstanding and unvested RSUs, provided the Participant is employed or engaged as a consultant as applicable, by the Company upon such Change in Control. Such RSUs will be settled in accordance with Section 4 of this Agreement.

assistant: Change In Control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Landlord’s employees, representatives and agents have no authority to make or agree to make a lease or any other agreement or undertaking in connection herewith. The submission of this document for examination and negotiation does not constitute an offer to lease, or a reservation of, or option for, the Premises, and this document shall be effective and binding only upon the execution and delivery hereof by both Landlord and Tenant. This Lease, including the Exhibits hereto, which are made part of this Lease, contain the entire agreement of the parties and all prior negotiations and agreements are merged herein. Neither Landlord nor Landlord’s agents have made any representations or warranties with respect to the Premises, the Building, the Property, the Project, or this Lease except as expressly set forth herein, and no rights, easements or licenses are or shall be acquired by Tenant by implication or otherwise unless expressly set forth herein.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: ( e ) all conditions , warranties and other terms which might otherwise be implied by statute , common law or the law of equity are , to the extent permitted by law , excluded .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: By each delivery of a Confirmation, Seller shall be deemed, as of the Purchase Date of the described sale of each Purchased Mortgage Loan (or, if another date is expressly provided in such representation or warranty, as of such other date), and as of each day thereafter that such Purchased Mortgage Loan continues to be subject to an outstanding Transaction, to represent and warrant that such Purchased Mortgage Loan is an Eligible Mortgage Loan and, other than as to each Freddie Mac Small Balance Loan and each Fannie Mae Small Mortgage Loan, to make the representations and warranties regarding it that are set forth in Exhibit B-1 . With respect to each Freddie Mac Small Balance Loan, Seller shall be deemed, as of the applicable dates specified above in this Section 10(a)(i) , to make the representations and warranties set forth on Exhibit B-2 . With respect to each Fannie Mae Small Mortgage Loan, Seller shall be deemed, as of the applicable dates specified above in this Section 10(a)(i) , to make the representations and warranties set forth on Exhibit B-3 . To the extent that any of the representations and warranties set forth on Exhibit B-2 or Exhibit B-3 , respectively, are inconsistent with the requirements of the applicable Agency Guidelines, the Agency Guidelines shall control and such representation or warranty shall be interpreted to be given a meaning consistent with the terms of the Agency Guidelines.

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: because there is no connection between Sourant’s breach of the covenant and his purchase of the 850 Acres, Murphy Farrell has no equitable interest in that property, and a constructive trust is not an available remedy. Thus, this ease is distinguishable from eases cited by Murphy Farrell in which a constructive trust was placed on property wrongly held as a direct result of a breach of a non-compete provision or other restrictive covenant. See Snepp v. United States, 444 U.S. 507, 515-16, 100 S.Ct. 763, 62 L.Ed.2d 704 (1980) (imposing constructive trust in favor of government on profits from book authored by former CIA agent that were attributable to his violation of fiduciary obligations to CIA); Eden Hannon & Co. v. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co., 914 F.2d 556, 564 (4th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>); Storage Tech. Corp. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., 395 Options: A. holding that plaintiffs need only allege that defendants provided information to the securities analysts upon which the reports were based B. holding that district courts failure to hold evidentiary hearing to ascertain whether defendant breached plea agreement was harmless when it was clear defendant breached agreement C. recognizing that the burden is on the landlord in a lease dispute to establish that the lease contract had been breached and that such breach entitled the landlord to the possession of the property in question D. holding investment analyst entitled to constructive trust on profits realized by investor when it breached noncircumvention agreement by using analysts information to directly buy lease portfolio E. holding that the plaintiffs were not entitled to present testimony that they were induced to enter an automobile lease by promises that they could disregard terms of the lease

assistant: The best answer is D. holding investment analyst entitled to constructive trust on profits realized by investor when it breached noncircumvention agreement by using analysts information to directly buy lease portfolio
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment, the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents constitute the entire agreement and understanding among the parties and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, whether written or oral, among the parties hereto concerning the transactions provided herein and therein.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Amendment by telefacsimile or electronic mail shall be equally as effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Amendment.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: With effect from March 1, 2016, Base Salary will be paid at an annualized rate of $270,000, which will be subject to annual review and adjustment by the Committee or the Board but will not be reduced below $270,000. Such amounts will be payable to Executive in accordance with the normal payroll practices of the Company.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Party consents to personal jurisdiction in any action brought in the United States federal and state courts located in the State of Texas with respect to any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or in relation to or in connection with this Agreement, and each of the Parties agrees that any action with respect to any such dispute, controversy, or claim will be determined exclusively in a state or federal district court located in Dallas County, Texas. EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, ANY OBJECTION WHICH THEY MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE VENUE OF ANY SUCH DISPUTE ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT BROUGHT IN SUCH COURT OR ANY DEFENSE OF INCONVENIENT FORUM FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH DISPUTE. EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ITS RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL WITH RESPECT TO ANY CLAIM BROUGHT BY IT OR BROUGHT BY THE OTHER PARTY THAT ARISES OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT.

assistant: Venues
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Employee currently receives a base salary and shall be entitled to continue receiving a base salary in an amount determined from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer and/or Compensation Committee of the Board (the “ Compensation Committee ”). The annualized amount of such base salary for each respective annual one (1) year period, including any increases hereafter approved, is referred to as the “ Base Salary ” for such respective one-year period.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Purchaser is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state of Delaware . The names of the members of the board of directors of the Purchaser on and after the Closing (the “ Post-Closing Purchaser Board ”) are set forth in the officer’s certificate of the Purchaser to be delivered pursuant to Section 4.12(a). The Purchaser, as the sole shareholder of ValidSoft on and after the Closing, has: (i) duly appointed and constituted the board of directors of ValidSoft (the “ Post-Closing VS Board ”), in accordance with all applicable Law and in accordance with ValidSoft’s Organizational Documents; and (ii) has caused ValidSoft, as the sole shareholder of ValidSoft UK, to duly appoint and constitute the board of directors of ValidSoft UK (the “ Post-Closing VS UK Board ”), in accordance with all applicable Law and in accordance with ValidSoft UK’s Organizational Documents.

assistant: Organizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parties agree that notwithstanding the release in Section 7, above, Shields shall remain entitled to receive and Patriot shall remain obligated to provide indemnification and liability insurance to the fullest extent under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporate Law Code and the Amended and Restatement By-Laws of Patriot, including Article IV thereof, as filed by Patriot with the SEC in 2015 as an Exhibit 3.2, and that a claim, suit, or proceeding against Shields by reason of the fact that he served as a legal representative, officer, employee or agent of Patriot or agreed to serve as such at the request of Patriot, includes any claim, suit, or proceeding against Shields for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with compensation that he received from Patriot while employed by Patriot and compensation that he is entitled to receive pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Patriot does not purport to indemnify Shields with respect to any funds that Shields may be ordered to return to Patriot in connection with any enforcement action by the SEC concerning compensation or other consideration Shields received while employed by Patriot.

assistant: Indemnity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) Each Guarantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably waives promptness, diligence, notice of acceptance, presentment, marshaling, demand for performance, notice of nonperformance, default, acceleration, protest or dishonor and any other notice with respect to any of the Guaranteed Obligations and this Guaranty and any requirement that the Administrative Agent or any other Secured Party protect, secure, perfect or insure any Lien or any property subject thereto or exhaust any right or take any action against the Company, any other Guarantor or any other Person or any collateral.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The obligations, covenants and representations of Oncor and Oncor Holdings hereunder will not be effective unless and until the Bankruptcy Court enters an order approving the Merger Agreement, with the exception of the obligations undertaken in (i) Section 2 ( Representations and Warranties ), (ii) Section 3 ( Interim Operations ), (iii) Section 5 ( Filings; Other Actions; Notifications ), (iv) Section 11 ( Notice of Current Events ) and (v) Section 16 ( Miscellaneous ) which will be effective as of the signing of this Letter Agreement.

assistant: Effectiveness
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you are a resident of south korea : notwithstanding anything in these terms to the contrary , nothing in these terms limits your rights to bring an action against under armour in the local courts of your place of domicile .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, will result in any material violation of (a) the charter and by-laws of the Company, and (b) any applicable law, ordinance, rule or regulation or any applicable order of any court or Governmental Authority, which violation, conflict or default would have a material adverse effect on the business, assets, properties, financial condition or results of operations of the Company or on the ability of the Company to perform its obligations hereunder.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: or the method of providing police or fire protection.”); City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex.1995) (“ ‘Thus, if the negligence causing an injury lies in the formulating of policy — ie., the determining of the method of police protection to provide — the government remains immune from liability.’ ”) (quoting State v. Terrell, 588 S.W.2d 784, 787-88 (Tex.1979)). Accordingly, we sustain the City’s issue with respect to Ballard’s claims based on negligent training and supervision of officers, for a ratified pattern of negligent handling and detainment of juvenile offenders by the City’s police force, and for the City’s “customs and policies.” C. Negligent Failure to Secure Mark in the Second Police Car Ballard asserted below, as he reass .W.3d 575, 580-81 (Tex.2001) (<HOLDING>); Norrell v. Gardendale Volunteer Fire Dep’t, Options: A. holding that claim for failure to monitor patient did not fall under ttcas property waiver B. holding that failure to furnish proper training instruction training manuals and documents to officer who injured plaintiff failure to provide adequate tests for that officer and failure to discipline that officer fell outside ttcas property waiver C. holding that the failure to object to an instruction constitutes a waiver of error D. holding that the failure to object to a trial courts instruction constitutes waiver E. holding that ems training lieutenants position met criteria because the lieutenants developed coordinated implemented and conducted ems training programs prepared lesson plans and training aids supervised delivery of training and tests and evaluated new equipment

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that failure to furnish proper training instruction training manuals and documents to officer who injured plaintiff failure to provide adequate tests for that officer and failure to discipline that officer fell outside ttcas property waiver
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: interest in teaching students the boundaries of socially appropriate behavior.” Id. at 681, 106 S.Ct. 3159. Schools are not prevented by the First Amendment from encouraging the “fundamental values of ‘habits and manners of civility,’ ” id., by “insisting that certain modes of expression are inappropriate and subject to sanctions.” Id. at 683, 106 S.Ct. 3159. And “[t]he determination of what manner of speech ... is inappropriate properly rests with the school board.” Id. Accordingly, Fraser establishes an exception to Tinker’s disruption requirement. Under Fraser, the banned school speech need not meet Tinker ’s disruption requirement; rather, speech in school can be banned if it is lewd, vulgar, indecent, or plainly offensive. Id. at 685, 106 S.Ct. 3159; see also Saxe, 240 F.3d at 213 (<HOLDING>); Boroff v. Van Wert City Bd. of Ed., 220 F.3d Options: A. holding that first amendment barred school from punishing student for vulgar myspace post concerning principal be cause it was offcampus speech B. recognizing obscene and indecent have different meanings and indecent speech may be regulated under some circumstances without transgressing the first amendment C. holding that university violated first amendment by expelling student for printing indecent newspaper despite student code prohibiting indecent conduct or speech D. holding that under fraser there is no first amendment protection for lewd vulgar indecent and plainly offensive speech in school E. recognizing school officials ability to act for the protection of minors from exposure to vulgar and offensive spoken language

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that under fraser there is no first amendment protection for lewd vulgar indecent and plainly offensive speech in school
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: product mix shift and lowered its earnings per share forecasts slightly. The report still gave Bailey an “Aggressive Buy” rating. After Bailey disclosed that its earnings for the third quarter of fiscal 1994 were only $0.16, Hancock lowered Bailey’s investment rating from buy to sell, based in part on the “serious credibility problem” of Bailey management. Hancock called Bailey’s third quarter earnings “a major negative surprise.” In support of their argument that Bailey should be held liable for alleged misstatements in these analysts’ reports, appellants cite cases in which courts have held that a defendant company may be held liable for any false or misleading statements contained in analysts’ reports. See, e.g., Elkind v. Liggett & Myers, Inc., 635 F.2d 156, 163 (2d Cir.1980) (<HOLDING>); In re RasterOps Corp. Sec. Litig., No. Options: A. holding that exclusiveremedy provision applied to both temporary staffing company and client company B. holding that a company may sufficiently entangle itself with analysts forecasts to render the predictions attributable to the company but finding no such liability C. holding owner of limited liability company may be personally liable to third party if owner acts as agent for company and fails to disclose existence and identity of principal D. holding that plaintiffs failure to mention vice president of thirdparty company in initial disclosures was harmless because plaintiffs mentioned president of company and defendants conducted no discovery of company E. holding that a limited liability company is a citizen of any state of which a member of the company is a citizen

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a company may sufficiently entangle itself with analysts forecasts to render the predictions attributable to the company but finding no such liability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Tenant represents and warrants to Landlord that it has not engaged any broker, finder or other person who would be entitled to any commission or fees in respect of the negotiation, execution or delivery of this Amendment, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Landlord against any loss, cost. liability or expense incurred by Landlord as a result of any claim asserted by any such broker, finder or other person on the basis of any arrangements or agreements made or alleged to have been made by or on behalf of Tenant in connection with any engagement regarding this Amendment.

assistant: Brokers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: was a practical but not logical necessity.” (footnote omitted)). It is clear that conspiracy to commit murder and the substantive offense of murder are discrete crimes to which Wharton’s Rule does not ordinarily apply to bar the imposition of cumulative sentences. Unlike the crime of pandering and the “classic Wharton’s Rule offenses — crimes such as adultery, incest, bigamy, dueling” — which, by their nature, necessarily require the participation of two persons for their commission, murder obviously can be committed by one person acting alone. Stewart, 225 Va. at 478, 303 S.E.2d at 879. Thus, “separate sanctions may be imposed” at a single trial for both murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Iannelli, 420 U.S. at 771, 95 S.Ct. at 1287; see Ramsey, 2 Va.App. at 272, 343 S.E.2d at 470 (<HOLDING>); Boyd, 236 Va. at 351, 374 S.E.2d at 303 Options: A. holding with respect to the application of whartons rule that where it is impossible under any circumstances to commit the substantive offense without cooperative action the preliminary agreement between the same parties to commit the offense is not an indictable conspiracy B. holding that prior felony drug convictions that fall within the conspiracy period may be used to enhance the defendants sentence if the conspiracy continued after his earlier convictions were final C. holding different rule applicable for conviction of second degree murder D. holding that failure to consummate scheme does not preclude conspiracy conviction E. holding that under whartons rule the defendants convictions of forgery and uttering as a principal in the second degree did not preclude her conviction of conspiracy to commit uttering

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that under whartons rule the defendants convictions of forgery and uttering as a principal in the second degree did not preclude her conviction of conspiracy to commit uttering
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: There are no actions, suits, proceedings, claims or disputes pending or, to the knowledge of any Loan Party, threatened, at law, in equity, in arbitration or before any Governmental Authority, by or against any Loan Party or any of its Subsidiaries or against any of their respective properties or revenues that (a) could reasonably be expected to adversely affect this Agreement, any other Loan Document or any of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, or (b) either individually or in the aggregate could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Sellers will deliver to the Buyer financial statements (audited and/or unaudited as required by SEC regulations) prepared in accordance with Reg. S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles through the balance sheet and income statement through March 31, 2016. KLJ & Associates, LLP will audit the December 31, 2015 financial statements and review the quarterly stub periods as required by Reg. S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. That balance sheet and income statement are true and correct and a fair and accurate presentation of the financial condition and assets, liabilities (whether accrued, absolute, contingent, or otherwise), and income of Rapid Fire Marketing, Inc. as of the date thereof in accordance with generally accepted principals of accounting applied on a consistent basis. Buyer will be responsible for the cost of the preparation of the forgoing financial statements and audit thereof.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Promptly upon written request from Employee, Employer shall indemnify Employee, to the fullest extent under applicable law, for all judgements, fines, settlements, losses, costs or expenses (including attorney’s fees), arising out of Employee’s activities as an agent, employee, officer or director of Employer, or in any other capacity on behalf of or at the request of Employer. Such agreement by Employer shall not be deemed to impair any other obligation of Employer respecting indemnification of Employee otherwise arising out of this or any other agreement or promise of Employer or under any statute.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Such Originator has filed or caused to be filed all U.S. federal income tax returns and all other material returns, statements, forms and reports for taxes, domestic or foreign, required to be filed by it and has paid all taxes payable by it which have become due or any assessments made against it or any of its property and all other material taxes, fees or other charges imposed on it or any of its property by any Governmental Authority, except to the extent that such taxes are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which such reserves or other appropriate provisions, if any, as are required by generally accepted accounting principles shall have been made.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The agreements in this Section shall survive the resignation of any Agent, the Term Agent and the Issuing Bank, the assignment of any Commitment or Loan by any Lender, the replacement of any Lender, the termination of the Aggregate Revolving Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all the other Obligations.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of its message is presumed to be unconstitutional.... When the government targets not subject matter but particular views taken by speakers on a subject, the violation of the First Amendment is all the more blatant. Viewpoint discrimination is thus an egregious form of content discrimination. The government must abstain from regulating speech when the specific motivating ideology or the opinion or perspective of the speaker is the rationale for the restriction. Id. at-, 115 S.Ct. at 2516 (citations omitted). 12 . The district court and the Building Authority rely on Lubavitch Chabad House, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 917 F.2d 341 (7th Cir.1990), as relevant authority. This reliance is misplaced; the legal d.2d 897 (1992); Kaplan v. City of Burlington, 891 F.2d 1024, 1030 (2d Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 926, 110 S.Ct. 2619, Options: A. holding that display of unattended menorah in city hall park quite close to seat of government violated establishment clause because its combination alongside a secular holiday display did not cause a viewer to see the exhibit as a whole or as a unitary symbol B. holding that display of solitary semipermanent menorah in city hall park closely associated with seat of city government violates the establishment clause C. holding that rluipa violates establishment clause D. holding there was no establishment clause violation in displaying a privately funded menorah during chanukah in the public plaza on which city hall and county building are located E. holding that a city owned creche and christmas tree erected in a public park adjacent to another park with a christmas tree lights and a privately owned menorah did not offend the establishment clause

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that display of solitary semipermanent menorah in city hall park closely associated with seat of city government violates the establishment clause
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Regardless of any action the Corporation or your Employer take with respect to any or all income tax (including U.S. federal, state and local taxes or non-U.S. taxes), social insurance, payroll tax, payment on account or other tax-related withholding (“Tax-Related Items”), you acknowledge that the ultimate liability for all Tax-Related Items legally due by you is and remains your responsibility and that the Corporation and your Employer (a) make no representations or undertakings regarding the treatment of any Tax-Related Items in connection with any aspect of the RSUs, including the grant of the RSUs, the vesting of the RSUs, the subsequent sale of any shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the RSUs and the receipt of any dividends or dividend equivalents, and (b) do not commit to structure the terms of the grant or any aspect of the RSUs to reduce or eliminate your liability for Tax-Related Items. Further, if you are or become subject to taxation in more than one country, you acknowledge that the Corporation and/or the Employer (or former employer, as applicable) may be required to withhold or account for Tax-Related Items in more than one country.

assistant: Tax Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: instances” where New York courts have recognized a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress in the employment context, the claims have alleged not merely sexual harassment, but “more significantly, battery.” Gerzog v. London Fog Corp., 907 F.Supp. 590, 604 (E.D.N.Y.1995) (citing Foster v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 609 F.Supp. 1191, 1198 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (Leisure, J.) (finding conduct sufficiently outrageous where employer forced plaintiff into an ongoing sexual relationship); O’Reilly v. Executone, Inc., 121 A.D.2d 772, 503 N.Y.S.2d 185, 186 (3d Dep’t 1986) (affirming denial of motion to dismiss where plaintiff had been subjected to physical sexual contact, jokes, pornography, and erotica); Collins v. Willcox, Inc., 158 Misc.2d 54, 600 N.Y.S.2d 884, 885-86 (Sup. Ct.1992) (<HOLDING>)); see also Salvatore, 1999 WL 796172, at *2-*3 Options: A. holding employer liable for hostile environment sexual harassment where supervisor capitalized upon his authority over plaintiffs employment to force plaintiff to endure prolonged violent and demeaning sexual relationship B. holding that a pattern of behavior that continually put plaintiff in embarrassing humiliating and demeaning positions that included sexual harassment and battery might well rise to the level of outrageous C. holding that assistant principals allegedly defective investigation did not rise to the level of extreme and outrageous conduct D. holding that the defendant could be convicted of sexual battery a lesser crime not included in the offense for which he was indicted where the defendant requested that sexual battery be submitted to the jury E. holding that battery is an inherently included offense of aggravated battery

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a pattern of behavior that continually put plaintiff in embarrassing humiliating and demeaning positions that included sexual harassment and battery might well rise to the level of outrageous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: is sought.’ ” Sample v. Keystone Mercy Health Plan, Civ. A. No. 12-3188, 2012 WL 5401015, at *4 (E.D.Pa. Nov. 5, 2012). We are bound by the Court of Appeals’ holding in Marra and agree with the numerous district courts deciding that the Seventh Amendment confers a right to a jury trial on PHRA claims seeking compensatory damages brought in federal court. See Id.; Weaver v. Cnty. of McKean, No. 11-254, 2012 WL 1564661, at *7 (W.D.Pa. Apr. 9, 2012) (“[T]he Court finds that Plaintiff has a right to a jury trial on her PHRA retaliation claim.”); Heater v. Kispeace, No. Civ. A. 05-4545, 2005 WL 2456008, at *5-6 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 5, 2005) (“Plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial on her PHRA claim for compensatory damages.”); Cortes v. R.I. Enterps., Inc., 95 F.Supp.2d 255, 260-62 (M.D.Pa.2000) (<HOLDING>). F. Compensatory and Punitive Damages pursuant Options: A. holding that the plaintiff had established an entitlement to relief on the merits of the claim and was therefore entitled to fees even though it was remanded to the agency for further action B. holding that claims under the vrra are equitable and a plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial C. holding that adea and phra claims proceed under the mcdonnell douglas framework D. holding plaintiff established entitlement to jury trial of legal claims brought under the phra E. holding that tort actions brought against a state actor must be brought in the illinois court of claims and the district courts dismissal of such claims was proper

assistant: The best answer is D. holding plaintiff established entitlement to jury trial of legal claims brought under the phra
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: testified that he examined bullets and casings found at both S & A Food Store and Fast Freddy’s. He concluded that the .9 millimeter used in the S & A offense was also fired during the Fast Freddy’s offense. Therefore, the State’s evidence showed a strong correlation between the S & A offense and the Fast Freddy’s offense, providing both intent and identity evidence in the Fast Freddy’s offense and eliminating the need for the Vogt Street offense. c. No Need for Vogt Street Offense The evidence outlined above shows that the State’s evidence of Russell’s intent in the Fast Freddy’s offense was strong; therefore, the need for the extraneous Vogt Street offense was minimal at best. See Montgomery, 810 S.W.2d at 390; Graff v. State, 65 S.W.3d 730, 740 (Tex.App.-Waco 2001, pet ref'd) (<HOLDING>). The State’s evidence showing Russell’s intent Options: A. holding that the cumulative effect of the evidence was sufficient to establish that defendant constructively possessed the methamphetamine laboratory discovered in a bedroom she shared with a renter B. holding that methamphetamine retained for personal use by the defendant who had been convicted of conspiracy to distribute the substance and never argued any of the methamphetamine was lawfully obtained was properly considered contraband with which he was directly involved and therefore relevant conduct C. holding that the enhancement applied where the defendant possessed a firearm in connection with possessing methamphetamine D. holding the state did not need this evidence of possession of 147 boxes of cold pills used to manufacture methamphetamine because the state had other convincing evidence to establish the defendants intent to deliver methamphetamine E. holding that the state is not allowed to suppress evidence but it need not collect evidence for the defendant

assistant: The best answer is D. holding the state did not need this evidence of possession of 147 boxes of cold pills used to manufacture methamphetamine because the state had other convincing evidence to establish the defendants intent to deliver methamphetamine
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: regarding an alien’s eligibility for § 1229b relief. See, e.g., Reyes-Vasquez v. Ashcroft, 895 F.3d 903, 906 (8th Cir.2005) (“Although the decision to grant cancellation of removal is a discretionary act by the Attorney General that we may not review, ... we may consider the predicate legal question whether the IJ properly applied the law to the facts in determining an individual’s eligibility to be considered for the relief.” (internal citations omitted)); Santana-Albarran v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 699, 703 (6th Cir.2005) (“The denial of relief based on the ground that the alien has failed to demonstrate a continuous physical presence ... is a non-diseretionary factual determination and properly subject to appellate review.”); Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft, 349 F.3d 213, 217 (5th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, Options: A. holding that whether an alien satisfies the continuous presence requirement of 8 usc 1229b is a nondiscretionary determination because it involves straightforward statutory interpretation and application of law to fact and is therefore reviewable B. holding that an aliens continuous physical presence is broken if the alien was offered and accepted the opportunity to withdraw an application for admission C. holding that the decision whether an alien meets the hardship requirement in 8 usc 1229b is a discretionary judgment D. holding that a determination regarding whether an alien met the continual physical presence requirement of 1229b was nondiscretionary and thus reviewable E. holding that boards ruling that aliens continuous physical presence terminated when he voluntarily departed country was a reasonable interpretation of 8 usc 1229b 2012

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that whether an alien satisfies the continuous presence requirement of 8 usc 1229b is a nondiscretionary determination because it involves straightforward statutory interpretation and application of law to fact and is therefore reviewable
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All payments made by the Borrower under this Agreement shall be made free and clear of, and without deduction or withholding for or on account of, any present or future income, stamp or other taxes, levies, imposts, duties, charges, fees, deductions or withholdings, now or hereafter imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by any governmental authority.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As of the Closing Date, immediately after the consummation of the Transactions to occur on the Closing Date: (a) the sum of the debt (including contingent liabilities) of the Parent Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis does not exceed the fair value of the assets of the Parent Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, (b) the capital of the Parent Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis is not unreasonably small in relation to the business of the Parent Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, contemplated as of such date and (c) the Parent Borrower and its Subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis do not intend to incur, or believe that they will incur, debts (including current obligations and contingent liabilities) beyond their ability to pay such debts as they mature in the ordinary course of business. For the purposes hereof, the amount of any contingent liability at any time shall be computed as the amount that, in light of all of the facts and circumstances existing at such time, represents the amount that can reasonably be expected to become an actual or matured liability (irrespective of whether such contingent liabilities meet the criteria for accrual under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 5).

assistant: Solvency
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: however , with regards to installable software that was delivered on a physical storage medium , you may transfer the entire software and accompanying documentation on a permanent basis to another person as long as you retain no copies ( including archival or backup copies ) of the software , accompanying documentation , or any portion or component of the software accompanying documentation , and the recipient agrees to the terms of this eula the software is intended for private use only .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Other than those already obtained, no consent, approval, order or authorization of, or registration, declaration or filing with, any governmental authority or other person or entity (including, without limitation, the shareholders of the Company) is required in connection with the execution and delivery by the Company of this Agreement and the performance and consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.

assistant: Approvals
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: mother’s motion to intervene in the parties’ divorce action where “[t]he mother was not trying to intervene in the issue of a divorce per se ...; rather, she was attempting to protect her interest in the property dispute following the divorce” and where mother alleged in her motion that she had an interest in the subject property of the action and that her ability to assert such interest would be impaired by the disposition of the property between the existing parties, husband admitted that his mother had given him money to buy the house and had not intended it as a gift, and husband’s denial that he was obliged to put the deed in his mother’s name eliminated him as an adequate representative of his mother’s interest), and Barrup v. Barrup, 198 Vt. 25, 111 A.3d 414, 420 (2014) (<HOLDING>), with Aniballi v. Aniballi, 255 Mont. 384, 842 Options: A. holding that extrinsic evidence of applicability of automatic stay could not be considered because divorce decree on its face recited that trial court had jurisdiction of matter and no evidence in record of divorce proceeding affirmatively showed that automatic stay deprived trial court of jurisdiction B. holding that trial court did not err C. holding that the trial court did not err in allowing husbands mother to intervene in his divorce case on these narrow facts where she was a record owner of property over which the trial court exercised jurisdiction D. holding that the trial court did not err in its refusal to consider the borrowers defense of merger on appeal since the defense was outside the subject matter jurisdiction of the trial court E. holding that the district court should not have exercised pendent party jurisdiction over the husbands loss of consortium claim and therefore the jurys verdict in his favor had to be reversed

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the trial court did not err in allowing husbands mother to intervene in his divorce case on these narrow facts where she was a record owner of property over which the trial court exercised jurisdiction