flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If the Executive becomes “disabled” (as defined below), the Company may give Executive written notice of its intention to terminate on the 30 th day after receipt of the notice by Executive. In the event the Executive is terminated due to Disability (a) all unvested awards granted to the Executive under the Equity Compensation Plans shall be immediately vested (provided performance share units shall only be payable subject to the attainment of the performance measures for the applicable performance period as provided under the terms of the applicable award agreement); and (b) any Supplemental Matching Contributions to the Chesapeake Energy 401(k) Make-Up Plan shall be immediately vested. Executive shall also receive a lump sum payment within thirty (30) days of the Termination Date of any PTO pay accrued but unused through the Termination Date. The right to the foregoing compensation due under clauses (a) and (b) above is subject to the execution by the Executive or the Executive's legal representative of the Company's severance agreement which will operate as a release of all legally waivable claims against the Company. For purposes of this Section 6.4, Executive is “disabled” if he is unable to perform the essential functions of the position (with or without reasonable accommodation) under this Agreement, which disability lasts for an uninterrupted period of at least 90 days or a total of at least 180 days out of any consecutive 360-day period, as a result of Executive’s incapacity due to physical or mental illness (as determined by the opinion of an independent physician selected by the Company). In applying this Section 6.4, the Company will comply with any applicable legal requirements, including the Americans with Disabilities Act.

assistant: Disability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Lessor may assign this Lease to any third party, provided it gives prior written notice to the Lessee with at least thirty (30) calendar days in advance of such assignment. Lessee may not assign this Lease Agreement without the prior writing consent from Lessor.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the twenty-four (24) month period following the Termination Date, Mr. Brady agrees to make himself reasonably available (after taking into account his personal and professional schedule) to cooperate with the Company in matters that materially concern: (i) requests for information about the services Mr. Brady provided to the Company, its affiliates and their predecessors, (ii) the defense or prosecution of any claims or actions now in existence or which may be brought in the future against or on behalf of the Company, its affiliates and their predecessors which relate to events or occurrences that transpired while Mr. Brady was employed by or providing services to the Company, its affiliates or their predecessors or (iii) any investigation or review by any federal, state or local regulatory, quasi-regulatory or self-governing authority as any such investigation or review relates to events or occurrences that transpired while Mr. Brady was employed by or providing services to the Company, its affiliates and their predecessors. Mr. Brady’s cooperation shall include: (A) making himself reasonably available to meet and speak with officers or employees of the Company, the Company’s counsel or any third-parties at the request of the Company at times and locations to be determined by the Company reasonably and in good faith, taking into account Mr. Brady’s business and personal needs and (B) giving accurate and truthful information at any interviews and accurate and truthful testimony in any legal proceedings or actions. Unless required by law or legal process, Mr. Brady will not knowingly or intentionally furnish information to or cooperate with any non-governmental entity in connection with any potential or pending proceeding or legal action involving matters arising during Mr. Brady’s employment with the Company, its affiliates and their predecessors.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be terminated by the either party by written notice to the other party, if the Closing has not been consummated on or before April 21, 2017; provided , however , that such termination will not affect the right of any party to sue for any breach by any other party (or parties).

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Committee may amend the Plan at any time and from time to time, provided that (i) no amendment shall deprive any person of any rights granted under the Plan before the effective date of such amendment without such person’s consent, and (ii) without approval of the Company’s stockholders, no amendment may (A) increase the number of shares of Stock which may be issued under the Plan, (B) change the description of persons eligible for awards, or (C) effect any other change for which stockholder approval is required by law or the rules of any relevant stock exchanges. Further, except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, or exchange of shares), the terms of outstanding Options or SARs may not be amended to reduce their exercise or base price, nor may outstanding Options or SARs be cancelled in exchange for cash, Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or SARs, or other Awards, without stockholder approval.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Notices and elections under this Program must be in writing. A notice or election is deemed delivered if it is delivered personally or if it is mailed by registered or certified mail to the person at his/her last known business address.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrowers (a) will deliver to Agent, with copies to each Lender, each of the financial statements, reports, and other items set forth on Schedule 5.1 no later than the times specified therein, (b) agree that no Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries will have a fiscal year different from that of Parent, (c) agree to maintain a system of accounting that enables Parent and Borrowers to produce financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and (d) agree that they will, and will cause each other Loan Party to, (i) keep a reporting system that shows all additions, sales, claims, returns, and allowances with respect to their and their Subsidiaries’ sales, and (ii) maintain their billing systems and practices substantially as in effect as of the Closing Date and shall only make material modifications thereto with notice to Agent.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas excluding that body of law known as conflicts of law. The Parties will endeavor to settle amicably by mutual discussions any disputes or claims related to this Agreement (“ Dispute ”). Failing such settlement, and excepting such claims as may be brought pursuant to Section 4 hereof in a state or federal court having jurisdiction, any other Dispute will finally be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association then applicable to employment-related disputes. The Parties will agree upon a single arbitrator. The Arbitrator will not have authority to award punitive damages to either Party. Each Party will bear its own expenses, but the Company will bear the fees and expenses of the arbitrator. This Agreement will be enforceable, and any arbitration award will be final. In any such arbitration, the decision in any prior arbitration under this Agreement will not be deemed conclusive of the rights as among themselves of the Parties hereunder. The arbitration will be held in Dallas, Texas. Any notices, including a demand for arbitration will be deemed served when delivered to the address indicated in Section 5.6 .

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All communications and notices hereunder shall (except as otherwise expressly permitted herein) be in writing and given as provided in Section 9.01 of the Credit Agreement. All communications and notices hereunder to any Subsidiary Guarantor shall be given to it in care of the Borrower as provided in Section 9.01 of the Credit Agreement.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: By the issuance of a Letter of Credit (or an amendment to a Letter of Credit increasing the amount thereof) and without any further action on the part of the Issuing Bank that issues such Letter of Credit or the Lenders, each Issuing Bank hereby grants to each Lender, and each Lender hereby acquires from such Issuing Bank, a participation in each Letter of Credit issued by such Issuing Bank equal to such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of the aggregate amount available to be drawn under such Letter of Credit. In consideration and in furtherance of the foregoing, each Lender hereby absolutely and unconditionally agrees to pay to the Administrative Agent, for the account of each Issuing Bank, such Lender’s Applicable Percentage of each LC Disbursement made by such Issuing Bank and not reimbursed by the Parent on the date due as provided in paragraph (d) of this Section, or of any reimbursement payment required to be refunded to any Borrower for any reason. Each Lender acknowledges and agrees that its obligation to acquire participations pursuant to this paragraph in respect of Letters of Credit is absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstance whatsoever, including any amendment, renewal or extension of any Letter of Credit or the occurrence and continuance of a Default or reduction or termination of the Commitments, and that each such payment shall be made without any offset, abatement, withholding or reduction whatsoever.

assistant: Participations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company will pay the Executive an annual base salary, which initially is $250,000, which base salary as in effect from time to time will be reviewed periodically (at intervals of not more than twelve (12) months) by the compensation committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”). In evaluating increases in the Executive’s base salary, the Compensation Committee will take into account such factors as corporate performance in relation to the business plan approved by the Board, individual merit, and such other considerations as it deems appropriate. The Executive’s base salary will be paid in accordance with the standard practices for other corporate executives of the Company.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 399, 409 (1988); U.S.A. Chamber of Commerce v. State, 89 N.J. 131, 157-158, 445 A.2d 353 (1982); American Fire & Cos. Co. v. New Jersey Dep’t of Ins., 256 N.J.Super. 423, 428, 607 A.2d 196 (App.Div.1992). When legislation impinges upon a fundamental right, or disparately treats a suspect class, it is subject to strict scrutiny, Rinier v. State of New Jersey, 273 N.J.Super. 135, 140, 641 A.2d 276 (App.Div.1994) (citing Drew Assocs. of NJ, LP v. Travisano, 122 N.J. 249, 258, 584 A.2d 807 (1991), certif. denied, 138 N.J. 269, 649 A.2d 1288 (1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1016, 115 S.Ct. 1358, 131 L.Ed.2d 216 (1995)), thereby requiring that the statute be the least restrictive alternative to accomplish a compelling governmen tal interest. San Antonio Sc . 118, 495 A.2d 1362 (App.Div.1985) (<HOLDING>). The equal protection safeguard “is offended Options: A. holding that the right to vote is fundamental B. holding contribution limits even those that operate as a ban not subject to strict scrutiny C. holding that a law that merely affects voting without actually denying the right to vote or depriving voters of equal representation is usually not subject to strict scrutiny D. holding that a fair referendum assuring the equal right to vote under 101a1 includes the right of members to have the vote scheduled at a time when they can exercise their vote and the right to be free from intimidation or fear of reprisal E. holding that nearly identical kansas statute did not violate equal protection clause when subjected to strict scrutiny

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a law that merely affects voting without actually denying the right to vote or depriving voters of equal representation is usually not subject to strict scrutiny
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: stored on a BBS pending delivery). Because subsection (A) applies only to messages in “temporary, intermediate storage,” however, these courts have limited that subsection’s coverage to messages not yet delivered to their intended recipient. See DoubleClick, 154 F.Supp.2d at 512; Fraser, 135 F.Supp.2d at 636. Defendants point to these cases and argue that messages remaining on an ISP’s server after delivery no longer fall within the Act’s coverage. But, even if such messages are not within the purview of subsection (A), they do fit comfortably within subsection (B). There is no dispute that messages remaining on NetGate’s server after delivery are stored “by an electronic communication service” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 2510(17)(B). Cf. DoubleClick, 154 F.Supp.2d at 511 (<HOLDING>). The only issue, then, is whether the messages Options: A. holding that emails stored by employee on hard drive of companyissued laptop were not in electronic storage as contemplated by the sca B. holding that email messages stored on a computer but not yet read were in electronic storage C. holding that an individuals reasonable expectation of privacy in the content of email communications is not vitiated by an understanding that the thirdparty service provider will maintain independent access to them noting that electronic communication is as important to fourth amendment principles today as protecting telephone conversations has been in the past D. holding that defendants communications sent into tennessee did not constitute purposeful availment because all were in response to communications initiated by the plaintiff E. holding that subsection b did not apply because the communications at issue were not being stored by an electronic communication service

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that subsection b did not apply because the communications at issue were not being stored by an electronic communication service
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Date), the Company agrees to pay interest in respect of the unpaid principal amount of each Base Rate Loan from the date the proceeds thereof are made available to the Company to (but excluding) the earlier of the conversion or maturity (whether by acceleration or otherwise) of such Base Rate Loan, at a rate per annum which shall be equal to the sum of the Applicable Margin plus the Base Rate in effect from time to time.

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: By accepting this Award, Participant expressly warrants that he or she has received an Award of Restricted Stock under the Plan, and has received, read and understands the Plan. Participant understands that the Plan is discretionary in nature and may be amended, suspended or terminated by the Company at any time.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to any protected right unless the state has a substantial reason for the discriminatory policy that bears a substantial relationship to the state’s objectives. Delaware’s public records law discriminates on its face between citizens and non-citizens. Although the State has a substantial interest in “defining its political community,” the citizens-only provision of its public records law does not bear a substantial relationship to that interest. Accordingly, we conclude that the provision violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV. We therefore will affirm the District 460 (concluding that South Carolina statute which imposed higher licensing fee on nonresident shrimp fisherman was unconstitutional); Mullaney v. Anderson, 342 U.S. 415, 72 S.Ct. 428, 96 L.Ed. 458 (1952) (<HOLDING>); Ward v. Maryland, 12 Wall. 418, 79 U.S. 418, Options: A. holding that licensing fee for nonresident commercial fishermen constituted discriminatory tax in violation of privileges and immunities clause B. holding that a confrontation clause violation constituted harmless error C. holding refund of discriminatory tax required because predeprivation remedy not clearly available for tax years at issue D. holding that state legislature should determine whether to cure discriminatory tax by enforcing tax as to all or forgiving tax in its entirety E. holding that commercial lobstering falls within the purview of the privileges and immunities clause

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that licensing fee for nonresident commercial fishermen constituted discriminatory tax in violation of privileges and immunities clause
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party represents and warrants to the other that no broker, agent or finder negotiated or was instrumental in negotiating or consummating this First Amendment other than Hughes Marino, representing the Tenant and Jones Lang LaSalle, representing the Landlord (collectively, the " Brokers "), who shall be compensated by Landlord pursuant to a separate agreement. Each party further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any claim for commission or finder's fee by any person or entity other than the Brokers who claims or alleges that they were retained or engaged by the first party or at the request of such party in connection with this First Amendment.

assistant: Brokers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Payment of any vested portion of the Cash Award, shall be made only in cash by the Company or an applicable Subsidiary (as determined in the sole discretion of the Company). All payments hereunder shall be made as soon as practicable after the vesting date of any portion of the Cash Award but in any event no later than thirty (30) days after such vesting date. Pending the payment or delivery of cash hereunder, the Company's obligation hereunder shall constitute an unfunded, unsecured general obligation of the Company and if applicable, any Subsidiary.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you also hereby do and shall grant each user of the site and/or the service a non-exclusive license to access your user submissions through the site and the service , and to use , edit , modify , reproduce , distribute , prepare derivative works of , display and perform such user submissions .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties respecting the employment of the Consultant on and after the Commencement Date, there being no representations, warranties or commitments except as set forth herein and supersedes and replaces all other agreements related to the subject matter hereof. For the avoidance of doubt, this Agreement does not supersede any agreement between Consultant and TCEH Corp. or any of its affiliates or predecessors. The Consultant acknowledges that, in connection with his entry into this Agreement, he was advised by an attorney of his choice on the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, on the application of section 409A of the Code to the payments and benefits payable or to be paid to the Consultant hereunder.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: States v. Bryan, 339 U.S. 323, 331, 70 S.Ct. 724, 730, 94 L.Ed. 884 (1950); see also United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 709-10, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 3108-09, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974) (noting that privileges should not be “lightly created nor expansively construed, for they are in derogation of the search for truth”). In order to breathe life into these principles, courts have been loathe to recognize absolute privileges. The closest analog to the privilege now sought by American— the self-critical analysis privilege — has been viewed as a qualified privilege that may be overcome upon a showing of substantial need. See, e.g., Textron, 157 F.R.D. at 522. Other familiar privileges are described as qualified rather than absolute. See, e.g., Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-706, 94 S.Ct. at 3106-3107 (<HOLDING>); In re Certain Complaints Under Investigation, Options: A. recognizing privilege B. recognizing qualified privilege for confidential presidential communications C. recognizing a qualified privilege for confidential sources in a libel suit D. holding that communications among judges related to official judicial business are protected by a qualified privilege E. recognizing qualified privilege protecting confidential communications among judges and their staffs in the performance of their judicial duties

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing qualified privilege for confidential presidential communications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 81 S.Ct. 1579, 6 L.Ed.2d 859 (1961). So it is with “harangue” and “oration” in this statute. The prohibitions surrounding “harangue” and “oration” demonstrate concern with disruptions of the Supreme Court’s order and decorum. These prohibitions include the use of “firearmfs],” “firework[s],” “explosive[s]” and “set[ting] fire to a combustible.” See 40 U.S.C. § 6134. After the “combustible” clause, the statute’s language shifts to “make a harangue or oration,” and “utter loud, threatening, or abusive language.” Id. These sundry prohibitions are not merely various noises — they all tend to disrupt the Court’s operations. That concern should illuminate the construction of “harangue” and “oration.” See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 110, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972) (<HOLDING>). By keeping this concern in mind, the use of Options: A. holding that a court should consider a defendants anticompetitive conduct as a whole rather than considering each aspect in isolation B. holding that the phrase relates to should be interpreted to limit the breadth of erisa C. holding that a statutes words even when marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth rather than meticulous specificity are clear based on what the ordinance as a whole prohibits D. holding an ordinance invalid to the extent that it permits what a statute restricts E. holding preempted municipal housing ordinance that would effectively remove persons from the city based on a snapshot of their current immigration status rather than based on a federal order of removal

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a statutes words even when marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth rather than meticulous specificity are clear based on what the ordinance as a whole prohibits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which will be considered an original but all of which will constitute the same instrument, notwithstanding that fewer than all of the parties have signed the same counterpart. A counterpart signature page transmitted by facsimile machine will be given the same effect as an original signature page. Any party signing this Agreement by facsimile must provide the other parties with a manually signed signature page within ten (10) days after the date of this Agreement.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 1085 (9th Cir. 2003). 23 . 798 F.3d at 747. 24 . Id. at 745-48; see also Lair y. Bullock, 697 F.3d. 1200, 1204-06 (9th Cir. 2012). 25 . 335 F.3d 889 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). 26 . Lair, 798 F.3d at 747; accord Lair, 697 F.3d at 1204 (“Randall is not binding authority because there was no opinion of the Court.”). 27 . Lair, 798 F.3d at 748; accord Lair v. Motl, No. CV 12-12-H-CCL, 189 F.Supp.3d 1024, 1031, 2016 WL 2894861, at *4 (May 17, 2016) (noting Eddleman "provides the overall analytical framework” for evaluating the constitutionality of a contribution limit).' 28 . Lair, 798 F.3d at 742 (quoting Eddleman, 343 F.3d at 1092). 29 . Eddleman, 343 F.3d at 1094 (quoting Shrink Missouri, 528 U.S. at 397, 120 S.Ct. 897). 30 . Contra Motl, 189 F.Supp.3d at 1035, 2016 WL 2894861, at *7 (<HOLDING>). 31 . 424 U.S. at 30, 96 S.Ct. 612. 32 . Id. Options: A. holding that directors of a whollyowned corporation could consider the interests of the parent company as well as the interests of their corporation because there was only one substantive interest to be protected B. holding on summary judgment that a regulation is narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest C. holding base limits at issue in that case could never be said to focus narrowly on a constitutionallypermissible anticorruption interest because they were expressly enacted to combat the impermissible interests of reducing influence and leveling the playing field D. holding that claim preclusion did not apply even though the legal theory at issue in that case was addressed in a previous case because the case at issue was based on a different set of operative facts E. holding previous case when no one challenged the issue could not be precedent on the issue

assistant: The best answer is C. holding base limits at issue in that case could never be said to focus narrowly on a constitutionallypermissible anticorruption interest because they were expressly enacted to combat the impermissible interests of reducing influence and leveling the playing field
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Award Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successor or successors of the Company and any Person or Persons who shall acquire any rig hts hereunder in accordance with this Award Agreement or the Plan.

assistant: Successors
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: its award of child custody in accordance therewith. SPINDEN, C.J., and NEWTON, J., concur. 1 . All statutory references are to RSMo Supp. 1998, unless otherwise indicated. 2 . As to the $1,200 in coins taken by the respondent from the coin collection, by not ordering the respondent to account to the appellant for those coins, we can infer that the court considered this money to be a necessary expenditure on the part of the respondent for her living expenses following the parties' separation, especially in light of the fact that the appellant blocked the respondent from any access to the parties’ joint accounts and no award of temporary maintenance was entered until October 1995, leaving her without funds for two months. See Cofer v. Price-Cofer, 825 S.W.2d 369, 373 (Mo.App.1992) (<HOLDING>). 3 . As the jewelry, by the appellant’s own Options: A. holding that there was no meeting of the minds as to expenses in the parties contingency fee contract and therefore the attorneys claim for reimbursement of litigation expenses was rejected B. holding that in an agreement where the father agreed to pay reasonable expenses to the extent that such expenses are not provided by any scholarship grant or other assistance for his sons education those expenses did not include loan repayment because it was not one of the forms of enumerated assistance C. holding that debtors have the burden of proving that other necessary expenses on form b22c are actual reasonable and necessary expenses and that these expenses should be considered in light of schedule j and other relevant evidence D. holding that an award for medical expenses is proper when the expenses have been incurred but not paid E. holding that necessary expenses such as living expenses are not considered a squandering or secreting of marital property such that reimbursement or a setoff should be ordered

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that necessary expenses such as living expenses are not considered a squandering or secreting of marital property such that reimbursement or a setoff should be ordered
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: his name and fingerprints. After obtaining this information, Holland was advised of his Miranda rights, and upon invoking his rights, the interview ceased. Several hours later, when the police determined that Holland had given them a false name (his fingerprints did not match the name Holland gave to the police), a detective went to Holland’s cell and asked Holland for his real name, which Holland provided. Holland moved to suppress this statement. The Florida Supreme Court, relying on this Court’s opinion in Avila v. State, 545 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (concluding that a question aimed at discovering the real name of a defendant is not an interrogation within the scope of Miranda ) and the Fifth District’s opinion in State v. McAdams, 559 So.2d 601, 602 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (<HOLDING>), concluded that because the detective’s Options: A. holding a social security number is not private B. holding that a defendants use of a persons name and social security number without permission constituted the use of a means of identification without lawful authority C. holding that basic identification data such as name age current address and social security number is not generally subject to miranda D. holding that although the social security number in the information and the social security numbers in the previous convictions did not match the rest of the identifying information the first and last name and date of birth did match and was sufficient to establish the defendants identity particularly in light of the fact that the defendant did not claim he was not the individual named in the previous convictions E. holding that a social security disability determination is a legal proceeding

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that basic identification data such as name age current address and social security number is not generally subject to miranda
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the applicable Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control, all Options outstanding on the date of such Change in Control, and all Stock Appreciation Rights shall become immediately and fully exercisable. The provisions of this Section 6.05 shall not be applicable to any Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted to a Participant if any Change in Control results from such Participant’s beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of Common Stock or Company Voting Securities.

assistant: Change In Control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the consolidating (if requested) and consolidated audited balance sheet and the related statements of income, stockholder’s equity and cash flow of Guarantor and its Subsidiaries as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, copies of which have heretofore been furnished to each Lender, present fairly the financial condition and results of operation and cash flows of Guarantor and its Subsidiaries as of such date and for such period. The unaudited balance sheet and the related statements of income, stockholder’s equity and cash flow of each Credit Party as of and for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 and (in the case of Borrower) the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, copies of which have heretofore been furnished to each Lender, present fairly the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows of such Credit Party as of such date and for such periods.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: at the conclusion of jury selection, but she never walked through it. Several courts have held that such a failure to reurge a motion for a change of venue during jury selection constitutes waiver. See, e.g., Gomez v. McGrath, 2005 WL 2072029 (E.D.Cal. Aug. 25, 2005) (in a federal habeas corpus proceeding, the federal district court noted that the state appellate court had rejected the claim of error by the trial court on the ground that petitioner had waived a change of venue claim “by failing to renew the motion after the trial court denied it without prejudice to its renewal after the jury had been voir dired on issues related to the motion”) (citing People v. Gomez, No. C019221, slip op. at 4-5 (Cal.Ct.App. Nov. 1, 1997)); Green v. Commonwealth, 266 Va. 81, 580 S.E.2d 834 (Va.2003) (<HOLDING>) cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1194, 124 S.Ct. 1448, Options: A. holding that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment the trial court is limited to the grounds raised in the motion B. holding that the defendant waived the issue of change of venue where the trial court denied the motion for a change of venue without prejudice stating that it was willing to reconsider the motion at any time during the jury selection process but the defendant never renewed the motion for a change of venue C. holding that where a defendant if given the opportunity to renew a motion for a change of venue immediately prior to trial but fails to do so the right to challenge venue is waived D. holding in a capital case that the defendant waived his argument that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a change of venue where the trial court took the motion under advisement but the defendant failed to seek a ruling on the motion and failed to renew the motion after the jurors had been qualified E. holding that trial court erred in denying motion for judgment of acquittal when state failed to prove venue

assistant: The best answer is D. holding in a capital case that the defendant waived his argument that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a change of venue where the trial court took the motion under advisement but the defendant failed to seek a ruling on the motion and failed to renew the motion after the jurors had been qualified
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: CURIAM. Maria B. Martinez appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of ALS IV, LLC (“ALS”). We affirm- the final judgment of foreclosure, but reverse the award of attorney’s fees because AlLS failed to present sufficient evidence to support the award. We reverse, and remand the attorney’s fee order for additional findings, or an additional hearing, if necessary. See Rodriguez v. Campbell, 720 So.2d 266, 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (<HOLDING>). Affirmed in part; Reversed in part and Options: A. holding that while remand is appropriate where the record may contain substantial competent evidence to support findings as to the rowe factors reversal is required where the record is devoid of any evidence to support the award of attorneys fees B. holding that when the party seeking attorneys fees presents some competent substantial evidence supporting the fee yet fails to include some essential evidentiary support the appellate court will reverse and remand the order for additional findings C. holding that appellate court should reverse and remand issue of attorneys fees where damages are reduced on appeal in a manner that could affect the determination of reasonable and necessary attorneys fees D. holding that this court will reverse and remand when appellate review of a suppression order is hindered by the absence of factual findings E. holding that when competent substantial evidence supports a trial courts ruling the appellate court will not secondguess the trial court

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that when the party seeking attorneys fees presents some competent substantial evidence supporting the fee yet fails to include some essential evidentiary support the appellate court will reverse and remand the order for additional findings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: With the exception of Base Rate Loans, interest on Loans and commitment and other fees and charges hereunder shall be computed on the basis of a year having three hundred sixty (360) days and calculated for the actual number of days elapsed. With respect to Base Rate Loans, interest shall be computed on the basis of a year having three hundred sixty-five (365) days or three hundred sixty-six (366) days, as the case may be, and calculated for the actual number of days elapsed. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, if an Event of Default shall occur hereunder, (a) the principal of each Note and the unpaid interest thereon shall bear interest, until paid, at the Default Rate; and (b) the fee for the aggregate undrawn face amount of all issued and outstanding Letters of Credit shall be increased from the Applicable LIBOR Margin then in effect to three percent (3%). In no event shall the rate of interest hereunder exceed the maximum rate allowable by law.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 400 U.S. 350 91 S.Ct. 479 27 L.Ed.2d 433 John Harry BRUNOv.PENNSYLVANIA. No. 205. Supreme Court of the United States January 12, 1971 Daniel L. Quinlan, Norristown, Pa., for the petitioner. Milton O. Moss, Norristown, Pa., for the respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District. PER CURIAM. 1 The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

assistant: 9
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parent Borrower has heretofore furnished to the Lenders its consolidated balance sheet and statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows as of and for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2016 and the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016. Such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations and cash flows of the Parent Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of such dates and for such periods in accordance with GAAP.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and voluntary”), and United States v. Chaney, 662 F.2d 1148, 1152 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) ("[A] trial judge must conduct a waiver hearing to make sure that the accused understands the risks of proceeding pro se and that he 'knowingly and intelligently waives the right to counsel’ before permitting the accused to proceed personally.” (quoting Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835, 95 S.Ct. 2525)), with United States v. Keen, 104 F.3d 1111, 1114-45 (9th Cir. 1997) (noting that “preferred procedure” is for court to discuss impact of self-representation in open court, but that there are "limited exception[s]” to this practice "when the record as a whole reveals a knowing and intelligent waiver" (quotation marks and citation omitted)), United States v. Bell, 901 F.2d 574, 578-79 (7th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>), United States v. Torres, 793 F.2d 436, 438 n. Options: A. holding that waiver of counsel during pcr review requires a judicial inquiry into whether defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel B. holding that a defendant can knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel only after his sic is aware of the nature of the charges against him the possible penalties and the dangers and disadvantages of selfrepresentation C. holding that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel even though the exchange between the magistrate and the defendant was inadequate standing alone to inform the defendant of the dangers and disadvantages of selfrepresentation D. holding that because the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to separate counsel in light of the courts unambiguous advisement that joint representation could present a very substantial conflict so far as his defense is concerned the defendant was precluded from claiming ineffective assistance of counsel due to the conflict of interest that ultimately developed E. holding that written waivers referring only in general terms to potential advantages of representation by counsel and potential disadvantages of selfrepresentation did not sufficiently demonstrate awareness of the dangers of selfrepresentation

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel even though the exchange between the magistrate and the defendant was inadequate standing alone to inform the defendant of the dangers and disadvantages of selfrepresentation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: access , tamper with , or use nonpublic areas of the services , niantic 's computer systems , or the technical delivery systems of niantic 's providers ;

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In any action or proceeding between Landlord and Tenant, including any appellate or alternative dispute resolution proceeding, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the non-prevailing party all of its costs and expenses in connection therewith, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees actually incurred.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Bottler is responsible for all sales and use taxes and similar taxes imposed on the Service Fees and for any other fees and charges under this Master Agreement and any Services Exhibit. CONA will collect from Bottler and remit such taxes where legally required to do so. Bottler will be responsible for remitting such taxes, if applicable, in states where CONA does not have a legal obligation to collect and remit such taxes.

assistant: Taxes