flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in federal court. See Wilson v. MVM, Inc., 475 F.3d 166, 174-75 (3d Cir. 2007) (distinguishing between prudential and jurisdictional exhaustion requirements, and holding that the administrative-exhaustion requirement found in the Rehabilitation Act is prudential in nature). Turning now to the case before us, we note that HHC has raised a legitimate question as to whether Allen’s and Slone’s disparate-impact claims have been exhausted. Specifically, HHC plausibly contends that the plaintiffs did not adequately describe their discrimination claim such that an EEOC investigation into potential liability based on disparate impact could have “reasonably expected to grow out of the charge of discrimination.” See Ang v. Procter & Gamble Co., 932 F.2d 540, 545 (6th Cir.1991) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>). Allen simply stated in her EEOC charge that Options: A. recognizing this rule B. holding that this court does not necessarily require the claim to be specifically raised in an eeoc charge provided that it satisfies this scopeofinvestigation test C. holding that an original eeoc charge is sufficient to support a civil suit under the act for any discrimination developed in the course of a reasonable investigation of that charge provided such discrimination was included in the reasonable cause determination of the eeoc D. holding that because a claim was never raised in the district court this court would not consider it for the first time on appeal E. holding that issues not raised before the district court cannot be raised for the first time before this court

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that this court does not necessarily require the claim to be specifically raised in an eeoc charge provided that it satisfies this scopeofinvestigation test
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as set forth on Schedule 3.6 as of the Closing Date, and except as hereafter disclosed to Lender in writing (including disclosures pursuant to Section 4.9 or otherwise, it being understood that any such disclosures shall not act as a consent or waiver of any Default or Event of Default arising under Section 4.9, Section 10.1(h) or any other provision of this Agreement), there is no Litigation pending against, or to such Credit Party’s knowledge threatened against or affecting, any Credit Party or, to such Credit Party’s knowledge, any party to any Operative Document other than a Credit Party. Other than as disclosed on Schedule 3.6 , there is no Litigation pending in which an adverse decision could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect or which in any manner draws into question the validity of any of the Operative Documents.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: by an Act of Congress.” (citing J.I. Case Co. v. NLRB, 321 U.S. 332, 337, 64 S.Ct. 576, 88 L.Ed. 762 (1944))). If Aymes’s weighing of the Reid factors applied in the context of the anti-discrimination laws, workers and firms would be able to devise compensation packages that included a no-benefits clause and a no-tax-deductions clause, thereby all but insuring that workers are characterized as independent contractors, and permitting them to opt out of the anti-discrimination laws. See ante at 116. But the core, substantive protections of the anti-discrimination laws were not intended to be skirted by the terms of individual employment contracts — even if on their face those terms concern only the compensation of a worker. Cf. Spirides v. Reinhardt, 613 F.2d 826, 832 (D.C.Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>). In sum, the holding of Aymes— that the Options: A. holding that there is no individual liability under title vii B. holding that the court may consider collateral evidence of the circumstances surrounding the execution of the agreement in determining whether the language of the agreement is unclear and if the evidence presented is so plain that no reasonable person could hold any way but one then the court may interpret the meaning as a matter of law C. holding that under the mwa the question of whether an employee was an independent contractor or an employee was a question of statutory interpretation D. holding that the determination of whether an individual is an independent contractor lies in the common law and not under an express provision of the act E. holding that in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor the district court relied principally if indeed not entirely on the contract language and that doing so was error because inter alia employment contracts no matter what the circumstances that justify their execution or what the terms may not be used to waive protections granted to an individual under title vii or any other act of congress

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor the district court relied principally if indeed not entirely on the contract language and that doing so was error because inter alia employment contracts no matter what the circumstances that justify their execution or what the terms may not be used to waive protections granted to an individual under title vii or any other act of congress
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All fees and expenses incident to the performance of or compliance with this Agreement by the Company shall be borne by the Company whether or not any Registrable Securities are sold pursuant to a Registration Statement. The fees and expenses referred to in the foregoing sentence shall include, without limitation, (i) all registration and filing fees (including, without limitation, fees and expenses (A) with respect to filings required to be made with any market on which the Common Stock is then listed for trading, and (B) in compliance with applicable state securities or Blue Sky laws), (ii) printing expenses (including, without limitation, expenses of printing certificates for Registrable Securities and of printing prospectuses if the printing of prospectuses is reasonably requested by the holders of a majority of the Registrable Securities included in the Registration Statement), (iii) messenger, telephone and delivery expenses, (iv) fees and disbursements of counsel for the Company, (v) Securities Act liability insurance, if the Company so desires such insurance, and (vi) fees and expenses of all other Persons retained by the Company in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. In addition, the Company shall be responsible for all of its internal expenses incurred in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including, without limitation, all salaries and expenses of its officers and employees performing legal or accounting duties), the expense of any annual audit and the fees and expenses incurred in connection with the listing of the Registrable Securities on any securities exchange as required hereunder. The Company shall reimburse a Holder’s reasonable legal fees in connection with a successful enforcement of its rights hereunder.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and outrageous,’ ‘beyond all possible bounds of decency,’ and ‘utterly intolerable in a civilized community’; (iii) the defendants’] conduct proximately caused plaintiffs emotional distress; and (iv) the distress was so ‘severe that no reasonable man could be expected to endure it.’ ” Davignon v. Clemmey, 322 F.3d 1, 8 n.2 (1st Cir. 2003) (quoting Agis v. Howard Johnson Co., 371 Mass. 140, 144-45, 355 N.E.2d 315 (1976)). To the extent that plaintiffs IIED claim is premised on the fact that defendants arrested him, that claim is barred by Heck. Plaintiff cannot now contend that defendants arrested him without probable cause, and the simple fact of an arrest pursuant to probable cause does not give rise to an IIED claim. See Godette v. Stanley, 490 F.Supp.2d 72, 80-81 (D. Mass. 2007) (<HOLDING>). However, to the extent that his IIED claim is Options: A. holding that failure to record an assignment does not give rise to a cause of action B. holding that a dispute regarding payment of a restaurant bill does not give rise to probable cause to arrest C. recognizing that warrantless arrests with probable cause do not give rise to 1983 claims D. holding that possessing property of another for the purpose of security on a debt does not give rise to probable cause to arrest E. holding that arrest made with probable cause and without excessive force does not give rise to iied claim

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that arrest made with probable cause and without excessive force does not give rise to iied claim
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party hereto hereby agrees to execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, such other documents, instruments and agreements, and take such other actions consistent with the terms of this Agreement, as may be reasonably necessary in order to accomplish the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Date and ends upon the last to expire of those patents and patent applications that ParkerVision or its Affiliates owns or controls as of the Effective Date (“ Term ”).

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: innovative, such that it could not be readily duplicated by others in the industry. See USA Power, 2010 UT 31, ¶ 45, 235 P.3d 749 (listing "the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others" as a relevant factor in determining whether information is a trade secret (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). Nor does CDC cite any record evidence that the pricing information required great time or financial investment to develop. See id. (listing "the amount of effort or money expended by the business in developing the information" as a relevant factor for determining whether information is a trade secret (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Microbiological Research Corp. v. Muna, 625 P.2d 690, 700 (Utah 1981) (<HOLDING>); Hammerton, Inc. v. Heisterman, No. Options: A. holding that the plaintiff failed to carry its burden of proving that its customer list was a trade secret in part because the sole evidence in regard to the customerlist concerned the expenditures in an unidentified sum B. holding that a customer list may be protectable as a trade secret if it is secret and the court examines and determines if it is protectable based on three factors 1 what steps if any an employer has taken to maintain the confidentiality of a customer list 2 whether a departing employee acknowledges that the customer list is confidential and 3 whether the content of the list is readily ascertainable C. holding that the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact that its customer list was a trade secret because the plaintiff presented evidence that the list took ten years and great expense to the company to develop D. holding former employee could properly use recollection of customer information where he did not otherwise misappropriate an actual customer list E. holding that the plaintiffs customer list was not a trade secret in part because there was no evidence that by the nature of the plaintiffs business extraordinary effort was involved in compiling the customer list

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the plaintiffs customer list was not a trade secret in part because there was no evidence that by the nature of the plaintiffs business extraordinary effort was involved in compiling the customer list
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: At the time of trial, Karen was disabled — “incapacitated,” using the statutory term — such that she was unable to support herself. She had just begun new treatments for her two disabling conditions, and although her treating physician acknowledged the possibility that the new treatments would enable her to find suitable employment at some point in the future, at the time of his deposition he did not attest that this result was certain to occur. Indeed, he specifically stated that more time was needed to evaluate the efficacy of the new treatments. Based on this record, therefore, the trial court abused its discretion by concluding that Karen’s incapacity was finite and certain to be cured within six months of the order. Cf. Haville v. Haville, 825 N.E.2d 375, 378 (Ind.2005) (<HOLDING>). We hasten to note that we are not saying as a Options: A. holding that duration of spousal maintenance award is measured by the duration of the period of incapacity and survives the death of the obligor B. recognizing that public policy favors limiting the duration of spousal maintenance to encourage a transition toward independence C. holding that the relevant factors include the nature of the scheme the identity of the participants the quality frequency and duration of each conspirators transactions and the commonality of time and goals D. holding that a trial court has broad discretion to modify a spousal maintenance award E. holding that there is no spousal exception to the statute

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that duration of spousal maintenance award is measured by the duration of the period of incapacity and survives the death of the obligor
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: by the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, in which the Court, without citation to any cases, held that a wife was not bound by the limited tort election made by her ex-husband. Kail v. Kalsek, Case No. GD99-15479 (Allegheny Cty. Ct. of Common Pleas May 31, 2001). Although the facts in Kail seem identical to Bujfetta (the wife was covered but not the named insured on her ex-husband’s policy and only became the named insured after her ex-husband was removed from the policy), the Court determined that a new policy was created and the ex-husband’s election could not bind the wife. Despite this contradiction, we cannot revisit our conclusion in Bujfetta simply on account of a Court of Common Pleas decision. See Smith v. Calgon Carbon Corp., 917 F.2d 1338, 1341, 1343 (3d Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>) (quoting Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc., 914 Options: A. holding that court is bound by prior panels interpretation of supreme court decision B. holding that an order issued by the pennsylvania supreme court in which it refused to exercise its kings bench jurisdiction to overturn gag orders issued by a lower state court did not implicitly reject the plaintiffs claim that the gag orders violated the first amendment as pennsylvania law authorized the pennsylvania supreme court to decline to exercise its kings bench jurisdiction where the case did not present an issue of immediate public importance C. holding that we are bound by the theory or reasoning underlying a supreme court case not just by its holding D. holding that we are required to predict the position which the pennsylvania supreme court would take in resolving this dispute and in the absence of a clear statement by the pennsylvania supreme court to the contrary or other persuasive evidence of a change in pennsylvania law we are bound by the holdings of previous panels of this court E. holding that the supreme court of pennsylvania is a state entity for purposes of the eleventh amendment

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that we are required to predict the position which the pennsylvania supreme court would take in resolving this dispute and in the absence of a clear statement by the pennsylvania supreme court to the contrary or other persuasive evidence of a change in pennsylvania law we are bound by the holdings of previous panels of this court
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Immediately upon (i) the decision by either party not to enter into a relationship as a result of the exchange of information hereunder, or (ii) a request by the Disclosing Party at any time, the Receiving Party will turn over to the Disclosing Party all Proprietary Information of the Disclosing Party and all documents or media containing any such Proprietary Information and any and all copies or extracts or derivatives thereof to the extent it is requested by either party in writing, except that a single copy may be retained for legal archival purposes, subject to protection and non-disclosure in accordance with the term of this agreement.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: argues that the § 341(a) creditors’ meeting was continued and concluded on August 23, 2006. The district court held that the § 341(a) creditors’ meeting was not concluded until August 23, 2006. The question presented to this court is, if no formal announcement of a continuation date is made, when is a § 341(a) creditors’ meeting concluded. This court has not previously ruled on this issue. The Debtor urges this court to apply a “bright-line” approach, holding that if a trustee does not announce a specific date to which the meeting is being continued within 30 days of the last meeting held, the meeting will be deemed to have been concluded on the last date it was convened. Some courts have adopted this approach. See Smith v. Kennedy (In re Smith), 235 F.3d 472, 476 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); In re Levitt, 137 B.R. 881, 883 Options: A. holding that it was immaterial to whether the senate had adjourned if it was a final adjournment or an interim adjournment and instead considering whether the adjournment prevents the president from returning the bill to the house in which it originated within the time allowed B. holding an unsecured creditors postconfirmation suit against a secured creditor for fraudulent misrepresentation at a creditors meeting constituted a collateral attack on the confirmation order C. holding that 20 of creditors knowing of consignment relationship does not satisfy general knowledge requirement notwithstanding that such creditors represented 63 of claims against debtor D. holding that judicial estoppel was inapplicable where debtor omitted potential claim against defendant from chapter 7 schedules but orally disclosed it to the trustee during the meeting of creditors E. holding that an indefinite adjournment of the 341a creditors meeting would nullify the thirtyday requirement in rule 4003b

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that an indefinite adjournment of the 341a creditors meeting would nullify the thirtyday requirement in rule 4003b
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise provided in this Note, all notices required or provided for under this Note shall be in writing and mailed, sent or delivered, if to Maker, at Maker's last known address or email address as shown on the records of Lender, and if to Lender, at its address shown on page 1, or, as to each party, at such other address as shall be designated by such party in a written notice to the other party. All such notices shall be deemed duly given when delivered by hand or courier, or three business days after being deposited in the mail (including any private mail service), postage prepaid.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Manager shall at all times during the term of this Agreement (including the initial term and any renewal term) maintain a tangible net worth equal to or greater than $3,000,000. In addition, Manager shall maintain “errors and omissions” insurance coverage and such other insurance coverage which is customarily carried by property, asset and investment managers performing functions similar to those of Manager under this Agreement with respect to assets similar to the Investments of the Company, in an amount which is comparable to that customarily maintained by other managers or servicers of similar assets.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Committee may provide in the Grant Letter that Grants identified as “qualified performance-based compensation” shall be payable, in whole or in part, in the event of the Participant’s death or disability, a Change of Control or under other circumstances consistent with the Treasury regulations and rulings under Section 162(m) of the Code.

assistant: Death
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and communications hereunder are required to be sent to the email address or physical address below by: (i) email with confirmation of acceptance, (ii) personal or courier delivery with written proof of acceptance or (iii) by commercial delivery service utilizing same or next day delivery. All notices so given shall be deemed received upon the the date shown on written proof of receipt.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company hereby employs the Executive as, and the Executive agrees to serve as, Vice President ࿽ Global Engineering, Quality and Strategic Sourcing, upon the terms and conditions herein contained. The Executive shall perform such duties and services for the Company as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company (the ࿽ Board ࿽) or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Executive agrees to serve the Company faithfully and to the best of his ability under the direction of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: as between you and duolingo , all data , information and materials generated from your access and use of the educational activities made available on or through the service , including translated content generated by you ( collectively , the `` activity materials '' ) , shall be exclusively owned by duolingo , and you shall not have any right to use such activity materials except as expressly authorized by these terms and conditions .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except for the security interests granted to the U.S. ABL Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Secured Parties pursuant to this Agreement and the other Liens permitted to exist on such Grantor’s Security Collateral by the ABL Credit Agreement (including, without limitation, in respect of Liens described in the definition of “Permitted Liens” in the ABL Credit Agreement) , such Grantor owns each item of such Grantor’s Collateral free and clear of any and all Liens. Except as set forth on Schedule 3 , no currently effective financing statement or other similar public notice with respect to any Lien securing Indebtedness on all or any part of such Grantor’s Security Collateral is on file or of record in any public office in the United States of America, any state, territory or dependency thereof or the District of Columbia, except such as have been filed in favor of the U.S. ABL Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Secured Parties pursuant to this Agreement or as are in respect of Liens permitted by the ABL Credit Agreement (including, without limitation, in respect of Liens described in the definition of “Permitted Liens” in the ABL Credit Agreement) or any other Loan Document or for which termination statements will be delivered on the Closing Date.

assistant: Titles
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Other Property Rights. Assignee hereby accepts such assignment and assumes and agrees to perform all of the terms, covenants and conditions to be observed or performed by Assignor under the Other Property Rights to the extent accruing or arising on or after the date of this Assignment. This Assignment is made by Assignor and Assignee subject to the terms of the Sale Agreement.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Credit Parties will give notice to the Administrative Agent, and each Term Lender in writing within three (3) Business Days’ of receipt of any written notice of proposed assessment or written notice of the commencement of any material audit or investigation by any Governmental Authority for unpaid Taxes of any Credit Party or any Subsidiary that are due and payable, any commencement of any litigation, proceedings or investigation affecting any Credit Party or any Subsidiary or to which any Credit Party any of its Subsidiaries is or becomes a party involving any claim against any Credit Party that has resulted in or would reasonably be expected to result in (i) liabilities of more than $500,000 that are not covered by insurance policies maintained in accordance with Section 6.07 against any Credit Party or any Subsidiary, (ii) a Material Adverse Effect or (iii) any commencement of (A) a criminal investigation, (B) criminal indictment or (C) a criminal conviction or penalty, in each case, with respect to a felony committed or allegedly committed by any Credit Party or member of Senior Management. The Credit Parties will give notice to the Administrative Agent and each Term Lender, in writing, in form and detail reasonably satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, within five (5) Business Days’ after obtaining knowledge of any judgment not covered by insurance, final or otherwise, against any Credit Party in an amount in excess of $500,000 or of the entry of any non-monetary judgment that would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof. If any provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any Person or any circumstance, is invalid or unenforceable, (a) a suitable and equitable provision negotiated in good faith by the parties hereto shall be substituted therefor in order to carry out, so far as may be valid and enforceable, the intent and purpose of such invalid or unenforceable provision and (b) the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such provision to other Persons or circumstances shall not, subject to clause (a) above, be affected by such invalidity or unenforceability, except as a result of such substitution, nor shall such invalidity or unenforceability affect the validity or enforceability of such provision, or the application thereof, in any other jurisdiction.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: termination for breach : vimeo may suspend , disable , or delete your account ( or any part thereof ) or block or remove any content you submitted if vimeo determines that you have violated any provision of this agreement or that your conduct or content would tend to damage vimeo 's reputation and goodwill .

assistant: Content removal, Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parties understand and agree that this Agreement, including facts and circumstances and all matters related to the subject of this Agreement, and the terms or substance of this Agreement, shall forever be deemed confidential between the Parties. Except for tax authorities, accountants and attorneys, and as required under the statutes, rules or regulations of any federal or state government, government agency, court of competent jurisdiction or securities industry self-regulatory organization, of which either Party is a member, the Parties shall not disclose or divulge this information to others unless required by lawful order of any court of competent jurisdiction and so as to enforce the instant agreement. The Parties agree that they shall refrain from making any disparaging remarks concerning the other Party. Any non-disclosure provision in this Agreement does not prohibit or restrict the Company or the Holder (or their respective attorneys) from responding to any inquiry about this settlement or its underlying facts by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or any other self-regulatory organization. The restriction in this section shall no longer apply upon the sooner of (i) two years; or (ii) the public disclosure of the terms of this Agreement by the Company. The Company undertakes to make such disclosures of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated herein with the Securities and Exchange Commission as required by applicable law.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Article and Section headings in this Agreement are included herein for convenience of reference only, shall not constitute a part of this Agreement for any other purpose and shall not be deemed to affect the meaning or construction of any of the provisions hereof.

assistant: Headings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nevada, Humboldt County, 542 U.S. 177, 186, 124 S.Ct. 2451, 159 L.Ed.2d 292 (2004)). A victim’s medical state can provide “context for first responders to judge the existence and magnitude of a continuing threat to the victim, themselves, and the public.” Bryant, 131 S.Ct. at 1159. We also consider not only whether the threat “to the first victim has been neutralized” but also whether the emergency “threatens the police and public[.]” Id. at 1158. The Supreme Court in Bryant noted that “[d]o-mestic violence cases like Davis and Hammon often have a narrower zone of potential victims than cases involving threats to public safety.” Id. However, even in domestic violence cases, the zone can extend beyond the victim. See Martin, 885 N.E.2d at 21 (<HOLDING>). Here, Medrano arrived at the fire station Options: A. holding that a plaintiff could not show that she engaged in protected activity because she did not present evidence that she informed her employer that her complaints were based on race or age discrimination B. holding that trial court was not required to conclude that wife was disabled for alimony purposes where she testified about her disability and offered documentation of her social security disability benefits but where she produced no medical testimony and where other evidence indicated that she was otherwise active and did not stay in bed all day as she claimed C. holding that a plaintiff can show that she is qualified by presenting credible evidence that she continued to possess the objective qualifications she held when she was hired D. holding that even though the declarant was not in danger she was experiencing an ongoing emergency because she did not know where her children were and she feared for their safety E. holding appellant produced no evidence that when she made her complaints to management she ever mentioned that she felt she was being treated unfairly due to her race or sex

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that even though the declarant was not in danger she was experiencing an ongoing emergency because she did not know where her children were and she feared for their safety
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: action is one of first impression. Federal field preemption may be inferred where “the federal interest is so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject.” Fidelity Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. de la Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141, 153, 102 S.Ct. 3014, 73 L.Ed.2d 664 (1982) (citation omitted). See also De Canas v. Bica, 424 U.S. 351, 357, 96 S.Ct. 933, 47 L.Ed.2d 43 (1976). Preemption occurs where a state law “stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.” Hines v. Da C.C.A.N. 5266, 5299 (stating Congress modeled Section 3730(h) in part after the whistleblower provision of the Toxic Substances Control .Act), and Braun v. Kelsey-Hayes Co., 635 F.Supp. 75, 80 (E.D.Pa.1986) (<HOLDING>). The Court concludes federal preemption of Options: A. holding that a wrongful discharge claim is not available given the availability of title yii remedies B. recognizing tort of wrongful discharge C. holding that the remedies are exclusive D. holding the statutory remedies for whistleblowers under the toxic substances control act 15 usc 2622 were exclusive and no state wrongful discharge claim could be maintained E. recognizing cause of action for wrongful discharge

assistant: The best answer is D. holding the statutory remedies for whistleblowers under the toxic substances control act 15 usc 2622 were exclusive and no state wrongful discharge claim could be maintained
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: statute’s “Omnibus Clause,” which functions as a catchall provision, and “is far more general in scope than the earlier clauses of the statute” covering grand jurors and court officers. United States v. Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593, 598, 115 S.Ct. 2357, 2362, 132 L.Ed.2d 520 (1995). At trial, Sussman did not object to the Court’s obstruction of justice instructions, so we review the charge for plain error. See Lee, 612 F.3d at 191. “A ‘plain error’ is one that affects substantial xdghts,” and “[a]n error affects ‘substantial rights’ if it was px-ejudicial in that it affected the outcome of the District Court proceedings.” United States v. Ozcelik, 527 F.3d 88, 96 (3d Cir.2008) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. Dalfonso, 707 F.2d 757, 760 (3d Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>). The defendant bears the burden of Options: A. holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice B. holding that error in classifying defendant as a violent offender caused a miscarriage of justice C. holding that courts may only review claims for fundamental miscarriage of justice D. holding that the error must be egregious or othexnvise constitute a manifest miscarriage of justice citation omitted E. holding that failure to consider an improper jury instruction would constitute a miscarriage of justice

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the error must be egregious or othexnvise constitute a manifest miscarriage of justice citation omitted
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in one or more counterparts, each of which when executed will be deemed an original, but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument. Telecopy or electronic signatures shall be deemed valid and binding to the same extent as the original.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the Award of Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California , U.S.A., without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof. For purposes of litigating any dispute that arises directly or indirectly from the relationship of the parties evidenced by this Award of Restricted Stock Units or this Agreement, the parties hereby submit to and consent to the jurisdiction of the State of California , U.S.A., and agree that such litigation shall be conducted only in the courts of Santa Clara County , California , U.S.A., or the federal courts for the United States for the Northern District of California , U.S.A., and no other courts, where this Award of Restricted Stock Units is made and/or to be performed.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: against Faret-ta and remanded for further proceedings. The rationale underlying the Faret-ta decision is that the defendant has a constitutional right to conduct his own defense without the benefit of counsel. Id. at 814, 95 S.Ct. 2525. This right includes “the calling and interrogation of favorable witnesses, the cross-examination of adverse witnesses, and the orderly introduction of evidence.” Id. at 818, 95 S.Ct. 2525. If a trial court improperly denies a defendant these rights, the only proper remedy is to have a new proceeding at which the defendant is permitted to exercise them. This necessarily requires a proceeding at which the defendant pro se can call and interrogate witnesses, cross-examine unfavorable witnesses, and introduce evidence. See, e.g., Tennis, 997 So.2d at 379-80 (<HOLDING>); Fleck v. State, 956 So.2d 548, 549 (Fla. 2d Options: A. holding that superior court erred in reversing trial courts order granting new trial and remanding for a new trial limited to apportionment of damages B. holding that the failure to hold a faretta hearing is per se reversible error and reversing the defendants conviction vacating his death sentence and remanding for a new trial C. holding that defendants waived any challenge to the trial courts failure to hold an evidentiary hearing D. holding that constructive amendments which are per se reversible under harmless error analysis are also per se reversible under plain error analysis E. holding the erroneous deprivation of the right to counsel constitutes per se reversible error

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the failure to hold a faretta hearing is per se reversible error and reversing the defendants conviction vacating his death sentence and remanding for a new trial
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: None of the parties hereto nor any of its respective member businesses and Affiliates shall, without the other parties' prior written consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), publicize or use (a) the other party's name (including a brief description of the relationship among the parties hereto), logo or hyperlink to such other parties' web site, separately or together, in written and oral presentations, advertising, promotional and marketing materials, client lists, public relations materials or on its web site (together, the " Publicity Materials "); (b) the names of officers of such other parties in the Publicity Materials; and (c) such other parties' name, trademarks, servicemarks in any news or press release concerning such party; provided however , notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no such consent shall be required (i) to the extent necessary to comply with the requests of any regulators, legal requirements or laws applicable to such party, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the 1933 Act, or pursuant to any listing agreement with any national securities exchange (so long as such party provides prior notice to the other party hereto to the extent reasonably practicable) and (ii) to comply with Section 11.12 .

assistant: Publicity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: States v. Jinwright, 683 F.3d 471, 478 (4th Cir.2012). A court’s refusal to give a requested instruction is reversible error if the instruction “(1) was correct; (2) was not substantially covered by the court’s charge to the jury; and (3) dealt with some point in the trial so important, that failure to give the requested instruction seriously impaired the defendant’s ability to conduct his defense.” United States v. Lespier, 725 F.3d 437, 449 (4th Cir.2013) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 974, 187 L.Ed.2d 829 (2014). We conclude that the district court provided an adequate specific intent instruction to the jury, and thus was not required to give an additional instruction on good faith. See United States v. Fowler, 932 F.2d 306, 317 (4th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Options: A. holding good faith jury instruction unnecessary when court gave adequate specific intent instruction B. holding that defendant charged with conspiracy to manufacture marijuana and possessing marijuana with intent to distribute was not entitled to specific buyerseller instruction even though support for such instruction existed because court gave a complete instruction reciting all the elements of conspiracy C. holding that a trial judge is obliged to give a correct jury instruction notwithstanding that request for instruction was technically erroneous if the evidence generates the subject matter of the jury instruction D. holding that when no objection was made to jury instruction evidence to support finding based on instruction should be assessed in light of the instruction given E. holding that a specific pretext instruction is not necessary

assistant: The best answer is A. holding good faith jury instruction unnecessary when court gave adequate specific intent instruction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If the Closing occurs: (a) each of the representations and warranties made by Purchaser herein shall be deemed modified if and to the extent necessary to reflect and be consistent with any facts or circumstances of which the Sellers have actual knowledge as of the Closing Date; and (b) each of the representations and warranties made by each Seller herein shall be deemed modified if and to the extent necessary to reflect and be consistent with any facts or circumstances of which Purchaser has actual knowledge as of the Closing Date.

assistant: Representations