flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge LEE joined. Judge KING wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question of first impression in this circuit whether and to what extent the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), in prosecuting a suit in its own name, is bound by a private arbitration agreement between the charging party and his employer. Other circuits are split on the proper response to this question. Compare EEOC v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., 156 F.3d 298 (2d Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>), with EEOC v. Frank’s Nursery & Crafts, Inc., Options: A. holding that neither the faa nor principles of preclusion or waiver could operate to bar the eeoc from seeking monetary relief on behalf of aggrieved individuals B. holding that even if indirect purchasers are barred from seeking damages relief they may still obtain injunctive relief C. holding a party seeking mandamus must serve the party against whom relief is sought D. holding that an arbitration agreement between a charging party and an employer precludes the eeoc from seeking purely monetary relief in federal court on behalf of the charging party but not from seeking broad injunctive relief E. holding that a private party may bring an action in a federal district court seeking injunctive relief on the basis of garmon preemption for only arguably protected or prohibited activity

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that an arbitration agreement between a charging party and an employer precludes the eeoc from seeking purely monetary relief in federal court on behalf of the charging party but not from seeking broad injunctive relief
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 350 U.S. 1 76 S.Ct. 33 100 L.Ed. 3 Autherine J. LUCY and Polly Anne Myers, Petitioners,v.William F. ADAMS, Dean of Admissions, University of Alabama, Respondent. No. 294 Misc. Decided Oct. 10, 1955. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioners, Autherine J. Lucy and Polly Anne Myers, citizens of Alabama, have been seeking admission to the University of Alabama since September 1952. Respondent William F. Adams is Dean of Admissions of the University. After hearings, United States District Judge Grooms of the Northern District of Alabama found that petitioners had been denied admission to the University 'solely on account of their race and color.' Holding this denied petitioners equal protection of state laws, the court permanently enjoined respondent Adams, his agent, employees and other acting in concert with respondent'from denying the plaintiffs and others similarly situated the right to enroll in the University of Alabama and pursue courses of study thereat, solely on account of their race and color.' 134 F.Supp. 235, 239. Respondent's motion to suspend the injunction pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was granted by the District Judge. A judge of that court denied a motion to vacate the suspension and reinstate the injunction. A similar motion is now before us. 2 The motion is granted and the injunction is reinstated to the extent that it enjoins and restrains the respondent and others designated from denying these petitioners, Autherine Lucy and Polly Anne Myers, the right to enroll in the University o Alabama and pursue courses of study there. Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U.S. 631, 68 S.Ct. 299, 92 L.Ed. 247; Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629, 70 S.Ct. 848, 94 L.Ed. 1114; McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S.Ct. 851, 94 L.Ed. 1149. In other respects, the motion is denied. 3 Motion granted in part.

assistant: 2
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements in this Agreement or pursuant hereto shall survive the Closing. Notwithstanding any knowledge of facts determined or determinable by any party by investigation, each party shall have the right to fully rely on the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the other parties contained in this Agreement or in any other documents or papers delivered in connection herewith. Each representation, warranty, covenant and agreement of the parties contained in this Agreement is independent of each other representation, warranty, covenant and agreement. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, no party has made any representation warranty, covenant or agreement with respect to the Shares or the Company.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: The Receiving Party shall use the Confidential Information solely for the purpose of its internal evaluation. The Receiving Party shall not make any other use, in whole or in part, of any such Confidential Information without the prior written consent of the respective Disclosing Party. The Receiving Party shall not use CEII, in whole or in part, for any purpose other than that for which the CEII was specifically provided, without the prior written consent of the respective Disclosing Party.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In addition to statutory holidays, Executive shall be entitled to paid vacation each calendar year during Executive’s employment according to the Company’s vacation policy applicable to all employees of the Company. Vacation shall accrue pursuant to the Company’s vacation accrual policy applicable to all employees of the Company.

assistant: Vacations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: qualify [for Exemption 5], a document must ... satisfy two conditions: its source must be a Government agency, and it must fall within the ambit of a privilege against discovery under judicial standards that would govern litigation against the agency that holds it.” Dep’t of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8, 121 S.Ct. 1060, 149 L.Ed.2d 87 (2001). Although the source of the Bechtel draft was possibly not, strictly speaking, the agency, the State of Nevada does not argue that this fact removes it from possible Exemption 5 coverage. In some circumstances where a document is produced by a contractor or consultant for an agency, courts have deemed it an "intra-agency” document. See, e.g., Hoover v. U.S. Dep't of Interior, 611 F.2d 1132, 1137-38 (5th Cir.1980) (<HOLDING>). 16 . Nevertheless, "opinion” work product, as Options: A. holding that an appraisal by an outside expert is an intraagency memorandum B. holding that an arrest made by an officer outside his jurisdiction does not violate the fourth amendment C. holding that an unsworn memorandum is a pleading and not an evidentiary document therefore it had no evidentiary value and should not have been admitted as an exhibit D. holding that an intraagency report containing an agency attorneys legal conclusions and reasoning falls within the exemption E. holding vague charge of discrimination in an internal letter or memorandum is insufficient to constitute opposition to an unlawful employment practice

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that an appraisal by an outside expert is an intraagency memorandum
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Grantor agrees, jointly and severally, to defend, protect, indemnify and hold the Collateral Agent and each of the Holders, jointly and severally, harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, fees, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable legal fees, costs, expenses, and disbursements of such Person’s counsel) to the extent that they arise out of or otherwise result from this Agreement (including, without limitation, enforcement of this Agreement), except claims, losses or liabilities resulting solely and directly from such Person’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, as determined by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction.

assistant: Indemnity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Party hereto shall be responsible for any and all taxes levied as a result of the performance of each Party’s respective activities under this Agreement. To the extent any withholding taxes apply to any payment, such payment shall be made net of such withholding tax.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event of any termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1 , there shall be no further liability or obligation hereunder on the part of any party hereto as to whom the termination is effective, and this Agreement (other than Article I , Section 9.5 , Section 9.6 , Section 9.7 , Section 9.8 , Section 9.10 , and Section 9.11 ) shall thereafter be null and void as to such party; provided , that nothing contained in this Agreement (including this Section 8.2 ) shall relieve any party from liability for any breach of any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement occurring prior to such termination.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment embodies the entire agreement and understanding among the parties hereto relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings relating to the subject matter hereof. No course of prior dealings among the parties hereto, no usage of trade, and no parol or extrinsic evidence of any nature, shall be used or be relevant to supplement, explain or modify any term used herein. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of this Amendment and the Loan Documents, the terms and provisions of this Amendment shall control. This Amendment is a product of negotiation and preparation by and among the parties hereto. Therefore, Borrower and Bank expressly waive the provisions of Civil Code Section 1654 and acknowledge and agree that this Amendment should not be deemed prepared or drafted by any one party or any other and shall be construed accordingly.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Executive agrees that the Executive will not publish or communicate to any person or entity Disparaging (as defined herein) remarks, comments or statements concerning the Releasees. The Company and its officers shall not publish or communicate to any person or entity any Disparaging remarks comments or statements concerning the Executive. “Disparaging” remarks, comments, or statements are those that impugn the character, honesty, integrity, morality, or business acumen or abilities in connection with any aspect of the operation of the Company’s business or the Executive.

assistant: Non-Disparagement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All payments to be made by the Borrower shall be made free and clear of and without condition or deduction for any counterclaim, defense, recoupment or setoff. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all payments by the Borrower hereunder shall be made to the Administrative Agent, for the account of the respective Lenders to which such payment is owed, at the Administrative Agent’s Office in Dollars and in immediately available funds not later than 2:00 p.m. on the date specified herein. The Administrative Agent will promptly distribute to each Lender its Applicable Percentage (or other applicable share as provided herein) of such payment in like funds as received by wire transfer to such Lender’s Lending Office. All payments received by the Administrative Agent after 2:00 p.m. shall be deemed received on the next succeeding Business Day and any applicable interest or fee shall continue to accrue. If any payment to be made by the Borrower shall come due on a day other than a Business Day, payment shall be made on the next following Business Day, and such extension of time shall be reflected in computing interest or fees, as the case may be.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: accordingly , you represent and warrant that : ( i ) you either are the sole and exclusive owner of all member content that you make available through the site or services or you have all rights , licenses , consents and releases that are necessary to grant to academia.edu the rights in such member content , as contemplated under these terms ; and ( ii ) neither the member content nor your posting , uploading , publication , submission or transmittal of the member content or academia.edu 's use of the member content ( or any portion thereof ) on , through or by means of the site or services will infringe , misappropriate or violate a third party 's patent , copyright , trademark , trade secret , moral rights or other intellectual property rights , or rights of publicity or privacy , or result in the violation of any applicable law or regulation .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: determination for that of the IJ. See DMuhumed, 388 F.3d at 819. Because the IJ failed to credit Baghdasaryan’s claims of political activity, it would be illogical to conclude that he was persecuted because of his political activities. Instead, it is logical to conclude that Kocharian’s followers demanded money and free car repairs from Baghdasaryan simply because they wanted money and free car repairs. This conclusion is supported by the fact that Baghdasaryan originally referred to his tormentors as “the mafia” instead of as government officials. When Baghdasaryan rebuffed their demands, they mistreated him. The persecution that Baghdasaryan suffered was the result of his resistance to extortion, not his political activities. See Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. at 483, 112 S.Ct. at 816 (<HOLDING>). The IJ’s determination that Baghdasaryan is Options: A. holding there was sufficient evidence of persecution on account of imputed political opinion where guerillas abducted petitioner because her husband and broth er were members of the guatemalan army B. holding that guatemalan guerrillas abducted petitioner on account of imputed political opinion because of her relatives military service C. holding that a guatemalan who was persecuted because of his refusal to serve in a guerilla army was not persecuted on account of his political opinion D. holding that attempted conscription by a guatemalan guerrilla group did not constitute persecution on account of a political opinion where petitioner failed to show that the group was motivated by his political opinion E. holding that absent solid support in the record for the petitioners assertion that he would be persecuted his fear was speculative at best

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a guatemalan who was persecuted because of his refusal to serve in a guerilla army was not persecuted on account of his political opinion
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except with respect to the material terms and conditions of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents, the Company confirms that neither it nor any other Person acting on its behalf has provided any of the Purchasers or their agents or counsel with any information that it believes constitutes or might constitute material, non-public information which is not otherwise disclosed in the Prospectus Supplement. The Company understands and confirms that the Purchasers will rely on the foregoing representation in effecting transactions in securities of the Company. All of the disclosure furnished by or on behalf of the Company to the Purchasers regarding the Company and its Subsidiaries, their respective businesses and the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Disclosure Schedules to this Agreement, is true and correct and does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The press releases disseminated by the Company during the twelve months preceding the date of this Agreement taken as a whole do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made and when made, not misleading. The Company acknowledges and agrees that no Purchaser makes or has made any representations or warranties with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby other than those specifically set forth in Section 3.2 hereof.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Unless a Dividend Deferral Election is made by the Participant, any dividends payable with respect to any Restricted Shares shall be paid to the Participant who deferred such Restricted Shares , subject, in the case of a Participant who is an Employee, to applicable withholding.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The term of employment under this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, August 1, 2017, and shall terminate on November 30, 2018, subject to earlier termination only pursuant to Section 12 (the “Term”).

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, EACH PARTY HERETO WAIVES AND AGREES NOT TO ELECT A TRIAL BY JURY WITH RESPECT TO ANY ISSUE ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: on appeal that Ms. Cabrera is registered with the DEA, the record is unclear whether the other requirements of section 3502.1 were met in this case. 4 Our decision does not preclude real parties in interest from requesting additional discovery if the pain management provisions of postoperative orders turn out to be “boilerplate,” and real parties in interest show the relevance of such other provisions as the return of patients to the orthopedic floor and standard vital signs checks to petitioner’s custom and practice of preparing postoperative orders. 5 At oral argument, real parties in interest argued for the first time that physician assistant orders do not fall within the physician-patient privilege,, citing Duronslet v. Kamps (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 717, 736 [137 Cal.Rptr.3d 756] (<HOLDING>). We consider this argument forfeited because Options: A. holding that emtala does not provide a private cause of action against individual physicians or against physicians medical corporations B. holding that emtala does not allow private suits against physicians C. holding physicianpatient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physicians supervision or acting as physicians agent D. holding that treating physicians testimony was properly discounted when it was inconsistent with physicians own treatment reports and the record as a whole and appeared to be based on patients subjective complaints E. holding strict control test inapplicable in determining the scope of immunity for physicians under federal law because medical ethics require physicians to exercise independent judgment in the best interest of their patients

assistant: The best answer is C. holding physicianpatient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physicians supervision or acting as physicians agent
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter and any and all prior agreements, understandings or representations with respect to its subject matter are hereby terminated and cancelled in their entirety and are of no further force or effect.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall continue until such time as (i) Executive provides the Company not less than sixty (60) days’ written notice of his intent to separate from the Company pursuant to Section 1(c) of the Standard Terms and Conditions; or (ii) either party terminates this Agreement in accordance with Section 1 of the Standard Terms and Conditions (the “ Term ”).

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Employer may withhold from any and all amounts payable under this Agreement such federal, state, and local taxes or other withholdings as may be required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable law or regulation.

assistant: Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Transaction Documents, together with the Exhibits and Schedules thereto, contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, with respect to such matters, which the parties acknowledge have been merged into such documents, exhibits and schedules. At or after each Closing, and without further consideration, the Company will execute and deliver to the Purchasers such further documents as may be reasonably requested in order to give practical effect to the intention of the parties under the Transaction Documents. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Securities may be assigned to any Person in connection with a bona fide margin account or other loan or financing arrangement secured by such Securities.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the adjudication and sentence, a statement of the reasons for such sentence, and a statement of credits received____ A copy of the judgment shall be forwarded to all parties and their counsel by the clerk forthwith upon entry. As we pointed out in State v. Moore, 178 N.J.Super. 417, 427, 429 A.2d 397 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 87 N.J. 406, 434 A.2d 1083 (1981), “under R. 3:21-5, a judgment of conviction occurs when the judge signs the sentencing order and it is entered by the clerk.” See State v. Womack, 206 N. J.Super. 564, 570, 503 A.2d 352 (App.Div. 1985), certif. denied, 103 N.J. 482, 511 A.2d 658 (1986) (stating that “the judgment is prepared by the clerk and signed by the judge and provides ‘finality’ ”); State v. Robinson, 198 N.J.Super. 602, 603, 487 A.2d 1304 (Law Div.1984) (<HOLDING>); State v. L.R., 167 N.J.Super. 364, 367-368, Options: A. holding that a notice of appeal is timely when filed before final judgment is entered by the district court B. holding that the judgment is entered following sentencing forthwith by the clerk C. holding that a second judgment controls over an earlier judgment entered in the same case D. holding that a default judgment was not void because the bankruptcy court that entered the judgment had proper jurisdiction over the party seeking relief E. holding part of the sentencing phase of trial the restitution amount is determined following conviction and is a matter resting within the sole province of the sentencing judge

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the judgment is entered following sentencing forthwith by the clerk
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: From time to time and without additional consideration, each party hereto shall take such further actions, as another party hereto may reasonably request as necessary for the purpose of carrying out and furthering the intent of this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) The Credit Agreement is hereby amended as of the Second Amendment Effective Date to delete the stricken text (indicated textually in the same manner as the following example: stricken text ) and to add the double-underlined text (indicated textually in the same manner as the following example: double-underlined text ) as set forth in the pages of the Credit Agreement attached as Exhibit A hereto.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as set forth on Schedule 4.15 of the Seller Disclosure Schedule (whose fees will be paid by Seller), no broker, finder or investment banker is entitled to any brokerage, finder’s or other fee or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of Seller.

assistant: Brokers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: a physician who is to decide upon admission to a hospital, order tests, drugs and treatments, and determining the length of stay.” S.Rep. No. 404, 89 Cong., 1st Sess. reprinted in 1965 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1943, 1986. In addition, “[t]he Medicaid statute and regulatory scheme create a presumption in favor of the medical judgment of the tending physician in determining the medical necessity of treatment.” Weaver, 886 F.2d at 200; see also Frey v. Bowen, 816 F.2d 508, 513 (10th Cir.1987) (stating that in social security disability proceeding, reports of treating or consulting physicians are entitled to greater weight than those of physicians hired by agency resisting claim); Worthington v. Idaho Dep't of Health and Welfare, No. 69458, slip op. at 5 (2d Dist. Idaho Feb. 20, 1992) (<HOLDING>). In accordance, if DHCF elects not to give Options: A. holding that the law of the case doctrine is not a fixed rule that prevents a federal court from determining the question of its own subject matter jurisdiction in a given case B. holding that the weight given a treating physicians opinion is limited if the opinion consists only of conclusory statements C. holding that the legislative history medicaid case law and the mechanics of the medicaid program itself require that an attending physicians opinion as to what constitutes medical necessity in a given case be given deference D. holding in the absence of exceptional circumstances deference should be given to trial court E. holding that the weight given to a treating physicians opinion is limited if the opinion consists only of conclusory statements

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the legislative history medicaid case law and the mechanics of the medicaid program itself require that an attending physicians opinion as to what constitutes medical necessity in a given case be given deference
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: bad law, we conclude that the territorial restriction in Atlanta Speciality’s uninsured motorist policy does not violate Mississippi public policy as embodied in the UM Act. Accordingly, we REVERSE the district court’s judgment and RENDER judgment for Atlanta Speciality. REVERSED AND RENDERED. 1 . The Mississippi Supreme Court has found various provisions of uninsured motorist policies ambiguous. See Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Brown, 446 So.2d 1002, 1006 (Miss.1984) (limitation of liability clause); Pearthree v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 373 So.2d 267, 270-71 (Miss.1979) (same); Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Bridges, 350 So.2d 1379, 1381-82 (Miss. 1977) (same); compare Blansett v. American Employers Ins. Co., 652 F.2d 535, 536-37 (5th Cir. Unit A Aug.1981) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). There is no dispute in this case that the Options: A. holding that limitation of liability clause was unambiguous B. holding that an identical or nearly identical limitation of liability clause was valid and enforceable under georgia law C. holding that the interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law D. holding that if easement language is clear and unambiguous and does not limit its duration then the court cannot impose such a limitation E. holding that duration of limitation is a factor in determining whether limitation is significant

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that limitation of liability clause was unambiguous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: R. L. c. 135, § 16 (1902), and the widow’s allowance authorized by R. L. c. 140, § 2 (1902), are distinguishable from intestate rights. The other statutes require a positive act of election on behalf of the widow, unlike the rights derived under the intestate statute. These elective rights are distinguishable from intestate rights since assertion of elective rights is necessarily inconsistent with testamentary dispositions provided for by will. We view paragraph ninth as merely requiring the widow to give up her statutory rights which, if exercised, would disrupt the testamentary disposition described by the testator’s will. Therefore, to allow Gertrude’s estate to share in the trust remainder would not defeat any provision of Frank Peabody’s will. See Ness v. Lunde, supra at 287, 295 (<HOLDING>). Our conclusion is in accord with the English Options: A. holding that even if divorced wife only owned a beneficial interest and not title interest in the residence constituting her homestead she was nonetheless entitled to claim a homestead exemption from the forced sale of the property B. holding that any property in which the taxpayer has any right title or interest is subject to foreclosure proceeding including property in which others claim an interest so long as all persons having liens or claiming any interest in the property are joined as parties to the suit C. holding that debtor as grantor and trustee of a trust that held legal title to the property held a sufficient equitable interest in the property to claim it as exempt homestead where she resided on the property prepetition with the intent to maintain it as her primary residence D. holding that a wife could claim a homestead exemption even though she only had a beneficiary interest in the property held in trust E. holding that doctrine of equitable election did not apply to intestate property where will provided devise to widow in lieu of dower homestead widows award and of any and all rights or interest she might have or claim in my estate

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that doctrine of equitable election did not apply to intestate property where will provided devise to widow in lieu of dower homestead widows award and of any and all rights or interest she might have or claim in my estate
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: interfered with his access to any aspect of the grievance program. Cf. O’Connor v. Featherston, No. 01 Civ. 3251(HB), 2002 WL 818085, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2002) (finding “substantial or reasonable” attempt to exhaust sufficient in light of defendants’ conduct); Gonzalez v. Officer in Charge of Barber Shop on Duty on May 13, 1999, No. 99 Civ. 3455(DLC), 2000 WL 274184, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2000) (ruling that assertions that inmate had been “frustrated” in his attempts to file grievances required denial of motion to dismiss); Lyon v. Vande Krol, 305 F.3d 806, 808 (8th Cir.2002) (“[W]e have held that inmates cannot be held to the exhaustion requirement of the PLRA when prison officials have prevented them from exhausting their administrative remedies.”); Brown, 312 F.3d at 112 (<HOLDING>). b. Conversion is Required as Nonex-haustion Options: A. holding a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy is not available where the employee has an existing statutory remedy B. holding that a thwarted remedy is not available C. holding that the remedy of habeas corpus is not available as a substitute for postconviction relief under rule 3850 D. holding that varity corp did not eliminate a private cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty when another potential remedy is available instead the district courts remedy is limited to such equitable relief as is considered appropriate E. holding that a remedy that prison officials prevent a prisoner from utilizing is not an available remedy under 1997e

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a thwarted remedy is not available
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parties may execute this Agreement in multiple counterparts, each of which constitutes an original as against the Party that signed it, and all of which together constitute one agreement. This Agreement is effective upon delivery of one executed counterpart from each Party to the other Party. The signatures of all parties need not appear on the same counterpart. The delivery of signed counterparts by facsimile or email transmission that includes a copy of the sending Party’s signature(s) is as effective as signing and delivering the counterpart in person.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay court-appointed attorney fees when the record is silent as to whether he “is or may be able” to pay those costs of his defense. See ORS 151.505(3) (“The court may not require a person to pay costs under this section unless the person is or may be able to pay the costs.”); ORS 161.665(4) (“The court may not sentence a defendant to pay costs under this section unless the defendant is or may be able to pay them.”). He acknowledges that he did not preserve that claim of error but urges us to review and correct the error as an “error of law apparent on the record.” ORAP 5.45(1). We agree with defendant that the trial court plainly erred in imposing attorney fees on this record. See State v. Coverstone, 260 Or App 714, 716, 320 P3d 670 (2014) (<HOLDING>). We further conclude that, for reasons similar Options: A. holding that a trial court commits plain error by imposing courtappointed attorney fees where the record is silent as to the defendants ability to pay the fees ordered B. holding because an award of attorney fees is discretionary court may consider attorney fees in relation to the underlying equities in the case C. holding that a trial court cannot decide the issue of attorneys fees without findings as to one spouses ability to pay and the others need D. holding that it is plain error for a trial court to require a defendant to pay courtappointed attorney fees in the absence of legally sufficient evidence that defendant has the ability to pay the amount imposed E. holding that trial court properly assessed mothers attorneys fees as necessaries against father in case in which trial court ordered father to pay mothers attorneys fees as child support but did not state that the fees were necessaries

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a trial court commits plain error by imposing courtappointed attorney fees where the record is silent as to the defendants ability to pay the fees ordered
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of section 121. Prior to the 1952 Patent Act, no protection was afforded to patent applications filed as a result of a restriction requirement — referred to at the time as a “requirement for division” — and such applications were often rejected or held invalid on double patenting grounds. See Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. N. Petrochemical Co., 784 F.2d 351, 358 (Fed.Cir.1986) (“SGK”) (Newman, J., concurring); In re Eisler, 40 C.C.P.A. 913, 203 F.2d 726 (1953). Thus, although a requirement for division embodied a determination by the PTO that the patent application contained more than one patentably distinct invention, such a determination did not protect the divisional application from rejection on grounds of double patenting. In re Isherwood, 46 App.D.C. 507, 512 (D.C.Cir.1917) (<HOLDING>). The PTO and the courts were therefore not Options: A. holding that there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that a defendants trial take place in a specific courtroom or division within a federal district and that the jury pool need not include anyone from the division in which the crime occurred B. holding that the attorney generals decision not to provide representation to an employee is reviewable by the appellate division not by the law division where the actions against the employee are pending C. holding that reconsideration of the correctness of property division was barred on appeal from the judgment enforcing that division D. holding that court lacked jurisdiction on appeal from injunction because the order was simply an interpretation of an earlier order E. holding that an examiner is not estopped from rejecting a divisional application because of an earlier requirement for division

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that an examiner is not estopped from rejecting a divisional application because of an earlier requirement for division
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: police take custody of a defendant’s belongings, such as a bag or suitcase, they may open the item and itemize its contents pursuant to standard inventory procedures. Id. Inventory searches of property lawfully in police custody are permissible “as long as that search is consistent with the police caretaking function.” United States v. O’Bryant, 775 F.2d 1528, 1534 (11th Cir.1985); see United States v. Khoury, 901 F.2d 948, 958 (11th Cir.1990). In addition, the former Fifth Circuit “has consistently recognized that the fourth amendment is not violated when the police take custody of the property of persons they arrest to store that property for safekeeping.” United States v. Gravitt, 484 F.2d 375, 378 (5th Cir.1973) ; see United States v. Lipscomb, 435 F.2d 795, 799-801 (5th Cir.1970) (<HOLDING>). Here, Cooper and Blanchard have abandoned any Options: A. holding that a visitor to a hotel room for purposes of distributing drugs failed to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the room B. holding that a hotel security guard was not liable under 1983 merely because he called police and brought the police to the plaintiffs hotel room C. holding that a 7 excise tax based on the charge to the public for a hotel room applied to the price expedia demands from the consumer for the right to occupy the hotel room and not the price expedia agrees to pay the hotel for the room D. holding that it was reasonable for police officers to take all the arrested couples personal belongings from a hotel room and bring the belongings to police headquarters E. holding that a hotel occupant who was asked to leave by police officers acting on behalf of hotel management who complained of defendants disorderly behavior was justifiably ejected under state law and no longer had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel room

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that it was reasonable for police officers to take all the arrested couples personal belongings from a hotel room and bring the belongings to police headquarters
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 34 (1998); see also Solomon v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 396 (1994). A claim of entitlement to VA benefits may be either a formal or an informal written communication requesting a determination of entitlement or evidencing a belief in entitlement to a benefit. 38 C.F.R. § 3.1(p) (2008). Any communication or action indicating intent to apply for one or more VA benefits may be considered an informal claim. 38 C.F.R. § 3.155 (2008). VA is required to identify and act on informal claims for benefits. 38 U.S.C. § 5110(b)(3); 38 C.F.R. §§ S.l(p), 3.155(a). The law is well established that intent to apply for benefits is an essential element of any claim, whether formal or informal, and that such intent must be communicated in writing. See MacPhee v. Nicholson, 459 F.3d 1323, 1326-27 (Fed.Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); Brannon, 12 Vet.App. at 35, (holding that Options: A. holding that when the contract language is unambiguous we take these words to represent the parties intent and the plain meaning of this language governs its interpretation B. holding that general statement of intent does not override plain language of statute C. holding that where attorney successfully represents a va claimant before this court the secretary is obligated under certain circumstances to pay directly to the attorney 20 of the pastdue benefits awarded on the basis of the claim or application for benefits underlying the issues successfully appealed to this court D. holding that the plain language of the regulations requires a claimant to have an intent to file a claim for va benefits E. holding that the statute of limitations for a miscalculation of benefits claim began to run at the time at which some event other than a denial of a claim should have alerted the claimant to his entitlement to the benefits he did not receive

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the plain language of the regulations requires a claimant to have an intent to file a claim for va benefits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: except as may be required to register and/or maintain your account , do not submit personally identifiable information ( e.g. first and last name together , password , phone number , address , credit or debit card number , medical information , e-mail address , or other contact information ) on the service .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the Release set forth the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement supersedes any and all prior understandings and agreements between the parties and neither party shall have any obligation toward the other except as set forth herein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Executive agrees that the execution of this Agreement and the payments made hereunder shall constitute satisfaction in full of the Company’s obligations to the Executive under any and all plans, programs or arrangements of Company under which the Executive may be entitled to payments and/or benefits in connection with the termination of his employment. This Agreement may not be superseded, amended, or modified except in writing signed by both parties.

assistant: Entire Agreements