flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be terminated in the absolute discretion of the Placement Agent solely with respect to its role in this transaction, by notice to the Co-Issuers and the Parent if, after the execution and delivery of this Agreement and prior to the Closing Date (a) trading generally shall have been suspended or materially limited on or by any of the New York Stock Exchange or the over-the-counter market; (b) a general moratorium on commercial banking activities shall have been declared by federal or New York State authorities or there is a material disruption in commercial banking or securities settlement or clearance services in the United States generally; or (c) there shall have occurred any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or any change in financial markets or any calamity or crisis, either within or outside the United States, that in the judgment of the Placement Agent is material and adverse and makes it impracticable or inadvisable to proceed with the offering, sale or delivery of the Notes on the terms and in the manner contemplated by this Agreement, the Time of Sale Information or the Offering Memorandum.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date set forth above and shall expire on February [28/29], 20___, provided that on February [28/29], 20___, and on each subsequent anniversary thereof, the term shall automatically be extended by the parties for an additional one-year period, until Constellation gives Executive notice, not less than 180 days prior to February [28/29], 20___, or an anniversary thereof, of a decision not to extend the Agreement for an additional one-year period.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties hereto agree that the Original Credit Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules thereto) shall be amended and restated in its entirety on the Restatement Date such that, on the Restatement Date, the terms set forth in the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified, the “ Restated Credit Agreement ”) shall replace the terms of the Original Credit Agreement, and the exhibits and schedules attached hereto as Exhibit B shall replace the exhibits and schedules to the Original Credit Agreement existing prior to the Restatement Date.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Loan Party hereby acknowledges and agrees that: (a) neither it nor any of its Affiliates has any claim or cause of action against any Agent or any Lender (or any of their respective Affiliates, officers, directors, employees, attorneys, consultants or agents) under the Loan Agreement and the Other Documents and (b) each Agent and each Lender has heretofore properly performed and satisfied in a timely manner all of its obligations to such Loan Party and its Affiliates under the Loan Agreement and the Other Documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Agents and the Lenders wish (and each Loan Party agrees) to eliminate any possibility that any past conditions, acts, omissions, events or circumstances would impair or otherwise adversely affect any of the Agents' and the Lenders' rights, interests, security and/or remedies under the Loan Agreement and the Other Documents. Accordingly, for and in consideration of the agreements contained in this Consent and other good and valuable consideration, each Loan Party (for itself and its Affiliates and the successors, assigns, heirs and representatives of each of the foregoing) (collectively, the " Releasors ") does hereby fully, finally, unconditionally and irrevocably release and forever discharge each Agent, each Lender and each of their respective Affiliates, officers, directors, employees, attorneys, consultants and agents (collectively, the " Released Parties ") from any and all debts, claims, obligations, damages, costs, attorneys' fees, suits, demands, liabilities, actions, proceedings and causes of action, in each case, whether known or unknown, contingent or fixed, direct or indirect, and of whatever nature or description, and whether in law or in equity, under contract, tort, statute or otherwise, which any Releasor has heretofore had or now or hereafter can, shall or may have against any Released Party by reason of any act, omission or thing whatsoever done or omitted to be done on or prior to the Consent Effective Date and arising out of, connected with or related in any way to this Consent, the Loan Agreement or any Other Document, or any act, event or transaction related or attendant thereto, or the agreements of any Agent or any Lender contained therein, or the possession, use, operation or control of any of the assets of each Loan Party, or the making of any Loans, or the management of such Loans or the Collateral, in each case, on or prior to the Consent Effective Date.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company and the Investor agree to execute and deliver such documents, certificates, agreements and other writings and to take such other actions as may be reasonably necessary or desirable in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise provided herein or as permitted or directed by law, any statement, notice, or other communication that Landlord or Tenant may desire or be required to give to the other shall be (i) hand delivered, (ii) sent by a reputable, national overnight courier service, or (iii) sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Notices shall be addressed at the address(es) set forth below or at such other addresses(es) as the other party shall designate from time to time by prior written notice. Notices shall be deemed to be given on the earlier of (i) when hand delivered, (ii) on the first business day after being deposited with an overnight courier, (iii) on the third (3 rd ) business day after being prepared in the manner provided above and deposited in the mail, or (iv) upon refusal of receipt by the recipient or inability to make delivery due to a change of address by the intended recipient without written notice as required herein. Notices may be given on behalf of a party hereto by counsel representing such party. Notice to parties other than the named Tenant and Landlord now or hereafter designated by a party as entitled to notice, are for convenience only and are not required for notice to a party to be effective in accordance with this section.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: ENERGY RECOVERY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES, WHETHER WRITTEN, ORAL, EXPRESS, IMPLIED STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, CONCERNING THE VALIDITY, ENFORCEABILITY AND SCOPE OF THE VORTEQ LICENSED TECHNOLOGY, WHETHER SUCH PATENT APPLICATIONS WILL BE GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO THE VORTEQ LICENSED TECHNOLOGY, WHETHER APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL-BASED CLEARANCES TO DEVELOP, MAKE, USE OR PRACTICE THE VORTEQ LICENSED TECHNOLOGY CAN OR WILL BE OBTAINED, THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, SAFETY, USEFULNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE OR, LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS (COMMERCIAL, REGULATORY OR OTHER) OF THE VORTEQ LICENSED TECHNOLOGY, PATENTED OR LICENSED KNOW-HOW AND ANY OTHER TECHNICAL INFORMATION, TECHNIQUES, MATERIALS, METHODS, PRODUCTS, PROCESSES OR PRACTICES AT ANY TIME MADE AVAILABLE BY ENERGY RECOVERY INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, QUALITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT AND WARRANTIES ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE, USAGE OR TRADE PRACTICE. WITHOUT LIMITATION TO THE FOREGOING, ENERGY RECOVERY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER TO SLB OR ANY OTHER PERSON FOR OR ON ACCOUNT OF ANY INJURY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, SUSTAINED BY, OR ANY DAMAGE ASSESSED OR ASSERTED AGAINST, OR ANY OTHER LIABILITY INCURRED BY OR IMPOSED ON SLB OR ANY OTHER PERSON, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH OR RESULTING FROM (A) THE MANUFACTURE, USE, OFFER FOR SALE, SALE, OR IMPORT OF ANY PRODUCT OR SERVICE USING THE VORTEQ LICENSED TECHNOLOGY, OR THE PRACTICE OF THE VORTEQ LICENSED TECHNOLOGY; (B) THE USE OF OR ANY ERRORS OF OMISSIONS IN ANY KNOW-HOW, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, TECHNIQUES, OR PRACTICES DISCLOSED BY ENERGY RECOVERY; OR (C) ANY ADVERTISING OR OTHER PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES CONCERNING ANY OF THE FOREGOING.

assistant: Warranties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 346 U.S. 270 73 S.Ct. 1030 97 L.Ed. 1603 Paul SHELTON, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES of America. No. 235, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States June 15, 1953 PER CURIAM. 1 The petition for certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the Government's confession of error, after reviewing the record in this case, we vacate the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the District Court. The case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in light of the confession of error.

assistant: 1
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the burden of establishing all elements of her entitlement. See, e.g., Shultz, 8 F.3d at 850. Mullins must therefore demonstrate that her attorneys charged a reasonable rate and that the time they expended on her representation was reasonable. See In re North (Gardner Fee Application), 30 F.3d 143, 146 (D.C.Cir.1994) (per curiam). Based on the affidavits and other exhibits submitted by Mullins, we conclude that the hourly rates charged by her attorneys ($90 — $295) comport with prevailing community standards and are within the realm of reasonableness. Id. We also conclude that she has, for the most part, provided adequate descriptions and documentation of the work performed. See National Ass’n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of Defense, 675 F.2d 1319,1327 (D.C.Cir.1982) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). Mullins submits numerous monthly bills for Options: A. holding that a fee application must contain sufficiently detailed information about the hours logged and the work done B. holding all contracts contain an implied term that the the person for whom the work is contracted to be done will not obstruct hinder or delay the contractor C. holding that the plaintiff sufficiently pleaded a violation of the fcra based on extraneous information where it was alleged that the document included broad language regarding disclosure of the information the accuracy of the information the consequences of providing a false statement and the effect of a photocopy D. holding that the unambiguous terms of the your work exclusion do not eliminate coverage for harm done to a subcontractors work E. holding that the officer played no role in the prosecution because the police report provided to the prosecutor did not contain false information

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a fee application must contain sufficiently detailed information about the hours logged and the work done
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: original; citation and internal quotation marks omitted). All reasonable inferences from the evidence presented at trial must be drawn in favor of the Government. Id. First, Wagner argues that the Government failed to prove the existence of a RICO enterprise because, he maintains, it presented no evidence of an enterprise distinct from the alleged predicate acts, and, further, the predicate acts alleged were nothing more than a discontinuous series of individual crimes. Neither of these arguments has merit. Contrary to Wagner’s first argument, neither the Supreme Court nor this Court has required that the Government’s proof of the alleged enterprise be distinct from the racketeering conduct. See, e.g., United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583, 101 S.Ct. 2524, 69 L.Ed.2d 246 (1981) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Indelicato, 865 F.2d 1370, Options: A. holding that while both the enterprise and pattern of racketeering elements must each be proven the proof used to establish these separate elements may in particular cases coalesce B. holding that 111 establishes three separate crimes each consisting of the elements of the preceding category of crime but adding an element or elements that must be proved to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt resulting in an increased penalty C. holding elements of rescission are 1 D. holding that medical expenses must be proven to be both reasonable and necessary E. holding that the creditor must prove the elements of actual fraud

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that while both the enterprise and pattern of racketeering elements must each be proven the proof used to establish these separate elements may in particular cases coalesce
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: is not automatically qualified as a business record under the Uniform Business Records as Evidence Law. The reason for recognizing a business record as an exception to the hearsay rule is the presumptive verity of routine recording of business transactions done on a regular basis at times close to the transactions recorded. The foundation which warrants the presumption of verity must be laid to qualify the records for admission. “Albeit it is said that a trial court possesses wide discretion in determining whether the requirements of [section] 490.680 for admission are met, the trial record should reveal evidence of compliance with each requirement of the law before any deference be accorded the ruling of the court nisi.” Id,.; see Nickels v. Nickels, 817 S.W.2d 632, 637 (Mo.App.1991) (<HOLDING>). “Ere proper admission of records under Options: A. holding that it was appropriate for the district court to refer to the documents attached to the motion to dismiss since the documents were referred to in the complaint B. holding that the burden of laying the proper foundation for the admission of the expert testimony is on the party offering the expert and admissibility must be shown by a preponderance of the evidence C. holding the testimony of an accountant was insufficient to lay a foundation for the admission of certain tax and financial documents where inter alia there was no evidence the taxpayer prepared the supportive memoranda or notes in the regular course of his business nor did the record reflect the time of preparation of these documents D. holding that in determining motion to dismiss on basis of res judicata the court could take judicial notice of all of the documents which are part of the record before it as well as the documents contained in the record before the state court without having to convert the motion to one for summary judgment E. holding that pursuant to the best evidence rule trial testimony relying on documents was inadmissible without submission of such documents or an explanation as to why the documents were unavailable

assistant: The best answer is C. holding the testimony of an accountant was insufficient to lay a foundation for the admission of certain tax and financial documents where inter alia there was no evidence the taxpayer prepared the supportive memoranda or notes in the regular course of his business nor did the record reflect the time of preparation of these documents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: EMPLOYEE agrees and acknowledges that he is entitled to no other severance payments or severance benefits and that no severance payments described in paragraph 4 herein will be made unless and until EMPLOYEE has fulfilled all of his obligations under this Agreement, including signing the Release contained herein and, upon the termination of his employment on October 7, 2016, signing the Second Release, attached hereto as Appendix A. Nothing herein can or is intended to affect EMPLOYEE’s pension rights or other retirement benefits or the amount (if any) of any pension payments or other retirement benefits to which he is entitled.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance and since January 1, 2017 have been in compliance with all Laws and Orders applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any assets or properties owned or used by any of them, except (a) for such past noncompliance as has been remedied and imposes no continuing obligations or costs on the Company or its Subsidiaries and (b) where any non-compliance, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written communication since January 1, 2017 from a Governmental Entity that alleges that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is not in compliance with any Law or Order, except where any non-compliance, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, a Company Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed in counterparts (and by different parties hereto in different counterparts), each of which shall constitute an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single contract. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Amendment by telecopy or e-mail (including in a “.pdf” format) shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that typically accompanies an adjudication of insanity — a stigma that often surpasses that accompanying a criminal conviction’ ” — can be deemed rational. Wayne R. LaFave et al., Criminal Law § 4.5(a) n. 16 (2d ed.1986) (quoting Note, 65 Minn. L.Rev. 927, 945-46 (1981)). Furthermore, this court has already recognized a competent defendant’s right to exert control over his or her defense. See Wood, 648 P.2d at 91; see also United States v. Marble, 940 F.2d 1543,1548 (D.C.Cir.1991) (finding that court should respect competent defendant’s decision not to raise mental illness defense). Therefore, Woodland should not be required to display a heightened level of competency to waive his right to a particular defense. See Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 113 S.Ct. 2680, 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993) (<HOLDING>). The trial court correctly concluded that Options: A. holding that the standard for determining competency to plead guilty is whether the defendant has a rational understanding of the proceedings B. holding that the state does not have to prove a defendants competency to stand trial C. holding competency standard for pleading guilty or waiving right to counsel is same as competency standard for standing trial and disapproving contrary holding of masthers D. holding that competency standard for stand ing trial is same as standard for determining competency to waive right to counsel E. recognizing that a defense attorneys opinion on the clients competency or incompetency is an important but not dispositive factor for trial court to consider in its competency determination

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that competency standard for stand ing trial is same as standard for determining competency to waive right to counsel
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event that any part or parts of this Agreement shall be held illegal or unenforceable by any court or administrative body of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not effect the remaining provisions of this Agreement which shall remain in full force and effect.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If a particular provision of the Plan shall be found by final judgment of a court or administrative tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provisions shall not affect any other provision of the Plan and the other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of 9-mm ammunition. In response to Israel’s objections to the presentence report, the probation officer noted that the search also resulted in the seizure of video-surveillance equipment and $1,047 in cash. The district court found that Israel possessed the firearms in connection with drug trafficking, noting that there had been a number of controlled buys from Israel, that he was in possession of cocaine when the search warrant was executed, that the firearms were hidden, that there was “a lot” of ammunition, and that scales and other indicia of drug trafficking were found. The district court expressed concern about Israel’s possession of a firearm with a large capacity magazine: “I really don’t know why anybody would have one of those for any reason.” See Taylor, 648 F.3d at 433 (<HOLDING>). Israel argues that the temporal remoteness of Options: A. holding that when determining prejudice under the objective test relevant considerations include 1 whether the extrinsic evidence was received by the jury and the manner in which it was received 2 whether it was available to the jury for a lengthy period of time 3 whether it was discussed and considered extensively by the jury 4 whether it was introduced before a jury verdict was reached and if so at what point during the deliberations and 5 whether it was reasonably likely to affect the verdict considering the strength of the governments case and whether the governments case outweighed any possible prejudice caused by the extrinsic evidence B. holding that to apply the firearm enhancement the firearm need only reflect the context of the defendants possession and the defendants ability to use the firearm to promote the controlled substance offense C. holding that the type of firearm and whether it is loaded are also considerations D. holding that to enhance a sentence because of the defendants use of a firearm the jury must find the defendant guilty of a crime involving a firearm or otherwise specifically find that a firearm was used E. holding that a relevant factor to consider in determining the applicability of the fortress theory is whether the type of firearm found in that case an automatic assault rifle is one that is commonly used by drug dealers

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the type of firearm and whether it is loaded are also considerations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement, together with the other agreements referenced herein, constitutes the entire understanding between the parties with respect to its subject matter, superseding all prior agreements and understandings, written or oral, with respect to its subject matter. This Agreement may not be amended or modified, nor any provision hereof waived, other than by a writing signed by Employee and an authorized representative of the Company.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: witness and the substance of the testimony concerning which the expert witness is expected to testify, as soon as is practical, but in no event less than thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of trial except on leave of court. Tex.R. Civ. P. 166b(6). Rule 166b(6) does not address whether supplemental discovery responses must be verified. Nevertheless, there are several reasons why a party should be required to verify supplemental interrogatory answers despite the lack of an express requirement in Rule 166b(6). Rule 168’s command that “interrogatories shall be answered ... fully in writing under oath” applies to all interrogatory answers, initially and whenever supplemented. Tex.R. Civ. P. 168(5); see also Sharp v. Broadway Nat’l Bank, 784 S.W.2d 669, 671 (Tex.1990) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). The rule does not distinguish between Options: A. holding that supplemental answers must be in writing as required by rule 1685 despite the lack of an explicit writing requirement in rule 166b6 B. holding that proof of an explicit agreement is not required C. recognizing rule D. holding district court need not make findings and conclusions as required by rule 52a because under rule 81a3 that requirement could be modified by issuing an order E. holding that the notice requirement found in rule 41d is not required by the fourth amendment

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that supplemental answers must be in writing as required by rule 1685 despite the lack of an explicit writing requirement in rule 166b6
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: rules or orders.” Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 382.113(a). The legislature imposed only the two restrictions previously mentioned: an ordinance must be consistent with the Act and the commission’s rules and orders and may not make unlawful a condition or act approved or authorized under the Act or the commission’s rules or orders. Id. § 382.113(b). If the ordinance violates one of these restrictions, however, then its preemption is implied with unmistakable clarity. We therefore turn next to the first of these restrictions and address the question of whether the Act and the ordinance are consistent. 3. The Clean Air Act and the tent with state legislation, we begin by comparing the purpose of each. See City of Weslaco v. Melton, 158 Tex. 61, 63-64, 308 S.W.2d 18, 19-20 (1958) (<HOLDING>); see also City of Brookside Vill. v. Comeau, Options: A. recognizing the two different types of conspiracies under the federal statute B. holding state and federal actions not parallel for colorado river purposes because the remedies were different one was equitable and the other compensatory and the sources of law came from different states C. holding that an implied warranty of merchantability does not create a labeling requirement different from or in addition to those mandated by fifra because the implied warranty of merchantability arises from the sale itself not from a state labeling regulation citation omitted D. holding that completing sixth grade and a limited ability to read were not inconsistent with a valid iq score of 68 E. holding that an ordinance banning the sale of grade a raw milk was not inconsistent with a state statute for grading and labeling milk because the two provisions served different purposes

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that an ordinance banning the sale of grade a raw milk was not inconsistent with a state statute for grading and labeling milk because the two provisions served different purposes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: sound because of changed conditions, and that more good than harm would result from a departure from precedent.' " (quoting Pratt & Whitney Can., Inc. v. Sheehan, 852 P.2d 1173, 1175-76 (Alaska 1993))). 11 . See AS 47.30.1765 (providing that a "respondent has the right to an appeal from an order of involuntary commitment"). 12 . We therefore do not address the dissenting opinion's discussion of the statute. 13 . In re Alfred H.H., 233 Ill.2d 345, 331 IIl.Dec. 1, 910 N.E.2d 74, 84 (2009) (citing In re Splett, 143 Ill.2d 225, 157 Ill.Dec. 419, 572 N.E.2d 883, 885 (1991)); State v. Lodge, 608 S.W.2d 910, 912 (Tex.1980); State v. J.S., 174 Vt. 619, 817 A.2d 53, 55-56 (2002). 14 . Alfred H.H., 331 Ill.Dec. 1, 910 N.E.2d at 84. 15 . Id. ("[A] reversal [of commitment order] could provi ) (<HOLDING>); E.J. v. State, 471 P.2d 367, 368-70 (Alaska Options: A. holding drivers license revocation was not moot because collateral consequences of revocation may be substantial including higher insurance rates and adverse employment consequences B. holding that revocation of parole does not create collateral consequences sufficient to extend standing beyond expiration of sentence and rejecting as moot a challenge to an allegedly erroneous parole revocation C. holding expired domestic violence restraining order not moot because of collateral legal consequences such as consideration in custody determination and nonlegal collateral consequences such as reputational harm D. holding that the collateral consequences of a parole revocation were insufficient to create a case or controversy after the petitioner was released E. holding revocation of appellants medical license not barred by previous acquittal on charge of criminal abortion even though criminal charge was basis of license revocation proceeding

assistant: The best answer is A. holding drivers license revocation was not moot because collateral consequences of revocation may be substantial including higher insurance rates and adverse employment consequences
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company is not obligated to offer the securities offered hereunder on a right of first refusal basis or otherwise to any third parties including, but not limited to, current or former shareholders of the Company, underwriters, brokers, agents or other third parties.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company has filed all reports, schedules, forms, statements and other documents required to be filed by the Company under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, including pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) thereof, for the two years preceding the date hereof (or such shorter period as the Company was required by law or regulation to file such material) (the foregoing materials, including the exhibits thereto and documents incorporated by reference therein, together with the Registration Statement, Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement, being collectively referred to herein as the “ SEC Reports ”) on a timely basis or has received a valid extension of such time of filing and has filed any such SEC Reports prior to the expiration of any such extension. As of their respective dates, the SEC Reports complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as applicable, and none of the SEC Reports, when filed, contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The financial statements of the Company included in the SEC Reports comply in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements and the rules and regulations of the Commission with respect thereto as in effect at the time of filing. Such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (“ GAAP ”), except as may be otherwise specified in such financial statements or the notes thereto and except that unaudited financial statements may not contain all footnotes required by GAAP, and fairly present in all material respects the financial position of the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of and for the dates thereof and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended, subject, in the case of unaudited statements, to normal, immaterial, year-end audit adjustments.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The proceeds of the Loans will be used only for (a) the payment of fees and expenses payable in connection with the Transactions, (b) to finance a portion of the Refinancing, (c) to finance acquisitions and Restricted Payments permitted hereby and (d) for other general corporate purposes of Holdings and its Subsidiaries. No part of the proceeds of any Loan will be used, whether directly or indirectly, for the “purchase or carrying” of any margin stock (as such term is defined in Regulation U), to extend credit to others for the purpose of purchasing or carrying margin stock or to refund Indebtedness originally incurred for such purpose.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as disclosed in the SEC Documents, no shares are reserved for issuance pursuant to the Company’s stock option plans, no shares are reserved for issuance pursuant to securities (other than the Note) exercisable for, or convertible into or exchangeable for shares of Common Stock and sufficient shares are reserved for issuance upon conversion of the Note (as required by the Note and transfer agent share reserve letter). All of such outstanding shares of capital stock are, or upon issuance will be, duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. No shares of capital stock of the Company are subject to preemptive rights or any other similar rights of the shareholders of the Company or any liens or encumbrances imposed through the actions or failure to act of the Company. Except as disclosed in the SEC Documents and common stock purchase warrants issued by the Company after December 31, 2018, as of the effective date of this Agreement, (i) there are no outstanding options, warrants, scrip, rights to subscribe for, puts, calls, rights of first refusal, agreements, understandings, claims or other commitments or rights of any character whatsoever relating to, or securities or rights convertible into or exchangeable for any shares of capital stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or arrangements by which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is or may become bound to issue additional shares of capital stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) there are no agreements or arrangements under which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is obligated to register the sale of any of its or their securities under the 1933 Act and (iii) there are no anti-dilution or price adjustment provisions contained in any security issued by the Company (or in any agreement providing rights to security holders) that will be triggered by the issuance of the Note or the Conversion Shares. The Company has filed in its SEC Documents true and correct copies of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation as in effect on the date hereof (“Certificate of Incorporation”), the Company’s By-laws, as in effect on the date hereof (the “By-laws”), and the terms of all securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock of the Company and the material rights of the holders thereof in respect thereto. The Company shall provide the Buyer with a written update of this representation signed by the Company’s Chief Executive on behalf of the Company as of the Closing Date.

assistant: Capitalization
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Item 6.21 (“ Insurance ”) of the Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true, complete and correct description of all insurance maintained by each Loan Party and each of its Subsidiaries as of the Effective Date . As of such date, such insurance is in full force and effect and all premiums have been duly paid.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Purchaser on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the Seller and Company on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, may in its sole discretion (i) extend the time for the performance of any obligation or other act of any other non-Affiliated Party hereto, (ii) waive any inaccuracy in the representations and warranties by such other non-Affiliated Party contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto and (iii) waive compliance by such other non-Affiliated Party with any covenant or condition contained herein. Any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed by the Party or Parties to be bound thereby. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no failure or delay by a Party in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise of any other right hereunder.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: a claim for or the receipt of workers’ compensation benefits or other payments arising from events unrelated to the ior injury is inadmissible because it is “clearly irrelevant to the issues being tried.” Leslie v. Higgason, 779 So.2d 470, 470 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Evidence concerning a “[plaintiffs] previous injury” may, however, be relevant to the issue of the defendant’s liability or the amount of damages due. Id. There are also circumstances where evidence specifically concerning litigation or claims by a plaintiff for a prior injury will be considered relevant to matters at issue and therefore admissible. Thus, “a plaintiff may properly be questioned about prior lawsuits or claims for injuries similar to those complained of in the present laws 2d 805, 806-07 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (<HOLDING>). Similarly, evidence relating to a subsequent Options: A. holding that trial court erred in excluding from evidence the application for social security benefits that the plaintiff made eight months prior to the accident at issue in which he described in detail his inability to work which was probative in establishing the plaintiffs condition prior to the accident and stating that since the plaintiff was denied social security benefits there was no collateral source B. holding that the claims court has no jurisdiction under the tucker act over claims to social security benefits C. holding that an evidentiary hearing is not required prior to the termination of social security disability benefits D. holding that offset for social security retirement benefits does not include federal disability benefits and stating that there was no legislative intent to embody the entire subchapter of the social security act dealing with both disability benefits and old age benefits E. holding that use of social security benefits satisfied child support obligation

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that trial court erred in excluding from evidence the application for social security benefits that the plaintiff made eight months prior to the accident at issue in which he described in detail his inability to work which was probative in establishing the plaintiffs condition prior to the accident and stating that since the plaintiff was denied social security benefits there was no collateral source
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA (WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO ANY CHOICE OR CONFLICT OF LAWS PROVISIONS).

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: award a reasonable sum of future medical expenses. Thus, the trial court’s ruling granting a partial directed verdict on future medical expenses, even if procedurally 1 sor substantively erroneous, is not a valid basis for remanding this matter for a new trial. Jury instruction as to past medical expenses award The third and final legal error the majority cites is the tidal court’s failure to instruct the jury on the law regarding past medical expenses incurred in good faith. The majority, however, fails to cite any authority, nor could I find any, requiring a jury be instructed on the law regarding recovery of past medical expenses incurred in good faith. This law is simply a jurisprudential principle. See Watson v. Hicks, 15-0046-48, p. 26 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/27/15), 172 So.3d 655, 675 (<HOLDING>). Regardless, Plaintiffs did not raise this Options: A. holding that under title vii the ultimate issue is the reason for the individual plaintiffs treatment not the relative treatment of different groups within the workplace B. holding that medical treatment is included in the traditional definition of necessaries C. holding that a claimant establishes a prima facie case for compensable medical treatment where a qualified physician indicates treatment was necessary for a workrelated condition D. holding that a tortfeasor is required to pay the expenses of over treatment or unnecessary medical treatment unless such treatment was incurred by the victim in bad faith E. holding ec is not responsible for medical treatment required independently by the subsequent noncompensable injury when the removal of a hindrance to recovery from the compensable injury is merely an incidental effect of such treatment

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a tortfeasor is required to pay the expenses of over treatment or unnecessary medical treatment unless such treatment was incurred by the victim in bad faith
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Privilege (2d ed. 1990); cf. Gamer v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1101 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied sub nom., Gamer v. First American Life Ins. Co., 401 U.S. 974, 91 S.Ct. 1191, 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (in analyzing attorney-client privilege issues, “[cjoneeptualistic phrases describing the corporation as an entity ... are not useful tools of analysis.”). This is such an instance. Plaintiffs have sued not only the Town of Georgetown, but the individual members of its Town Council. See D.I. 1. The Court must, therefore, examine the legal relationship that exists between the Town Council and its individual councilmembers in evaluating attorney-client privilege issues. See Del.U.R.E. 502(b)(3); Kirby v. Kirby, No. 8604, 1987 WL 14862 (Del.Ch. July 29, 1987) (LEXIS, States library, Del file) (<HOLDING>); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 918 F.2d 374, Options: A. holding that independent directors can be entrusted with the decision to sue other directors on behalf of the corporation B. holding the privilege belonged to both the corporate client a closely held charitable foundation and its directors because at the time of the privileged communication the directors collectively were the client C. recognizing privilege for corporate officers directors and shareholders to influence the actions of their corporation D. holding that an attorney may only undertake to represent a new client against a former client where there is no confidential information received from the former client that is in any way relevant to representation of the current client E. holding that even where a client was more sophisticated in business matters than the lawyer himself the lawyer should have assumed the client was relying on the lawyer for the legal aspects of the loan from the client to the lawyer to the same extent that the client would rely on the lawyer for advice were the client making the loan to a third person

assistant: The best answer is B. holding the privilege belonged to both the corporate client a closely held charitable foundation and its directors because at the time of the privileged communication the directors collectively were the client