flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall terminate when the security interest granted hereunder has terminated and all the Collateral has been released; provided that the provisions of Sections 4.10, 4.11, 7.12 and 7.13 shall not be affected by any such termination.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and Advice ■ The clergy communications privilege does not apply unless the confider consults the member of the clergy “for the purpose of seeking spiritual counsel or advice.” § 90.505(l)(b). No reported Florida decisions address this requirement of the privilege. Courts from other jurisdictions have interpreted similar statutory provisions to exclude from the operation of the privilege communications made for purposes not related to religious or spiritual concerns. E.g., Magar v. State, 308 Ark. 380, 826 S.W.2d 221 (1992) (finding privilege inapplicable to defendant’s admission to minister’s accusation of sexual abuse of minors where conversation was initiated by minister for disciplinary purposes and not for spiritual counseling); Burger v. State, 238 Ga. 171, 231 S.E.2d 769 (1977) (<HOLDING>); Keenan v. Gigante, 47 N.Y.2d 160, 417 Options: A. holding wife did not have a duty to warn a police officer who was shot while escorting her home that her husband had threatened to kill any police officer B. holding trial court erred in finding purported wife unavailable to testify and admitting her sworn prior statements in lieu of her live testimony where record did not support courts ruling in light of its own finding that remarriage of wife and defendant was fraudulent and wife did not refuse to testify if claim of privilege was denied C. holding that statements elicited from a defendant in violation of his miranda rights could be introduced to impeach that defendants credibility when the jury was instructed that the statements were not to be considered as evidence of his guilt D. holding that lofton would have no standing to appeal the district courts determination that his wife waived her spousal testimonial privilege E. holding defendant could not claim privilege concerning conversational statements to clergy member who was his friend and frequent companion concerning defendants intent to kill his wife and her lover

assistant: The best answer is E. holding defendant could not claim privilege concerning conversational statements to clergy member who was his friend and frequent companion concerning defendants intent to kill his wife and her lover
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: facts prevent the imposition of vicarious liability under Restatement (Second) of Torts sections 427, 427A, and 427B even were we to adopt them. It is undisputed that Green did not set the fire that spread to Poteet's sawmill. Because these restatement sections would not impose vicarious lability on White given the undisputed facts in this case, we expressly decline to address in this appeal the issue of whether to adopt these sections in Utah. We therefore affirm. { 14 Chief Justice DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice WILKINS, Justice PARRISH, and Justice NEHRING concur in Justice DURRANT's opinion. 1 . Utah R. Civ. P. 56(c). 2 . Ledfors v. Emery County Sch. Dist., 849 P.2d 1162, 1162 (Utah 1993). 3 . Utah R. Civ. P. 56(e) accord Johnson v. Hermes Assocs., 2005 UT 82, ¶ 20, 128 P.3d 1151 (<HOLDING>). 4 . See Johnson, 2005 UT 82, ¶ 20, 128 P.3d Options: A. holding that the affiants statement based upon his belief did not demonstrate the personal knowledge required by fedrcivp 56e B. holding that jurisdiction exists for determining if disputed facts are material C. holding that the respondent failed to carry his burden of establishing the applicability of the capableofrepetition exception where the respondent disputed only whether the specific facts that were established during the hearing in this specific adjudication were sufficient D. holding that facts were not disputed because nonmovant failed to contest them with specific sworn evidence as required under rule 56e E. holding that a verified complaint can be considered as summary judgment evidence only to the extent that it comports with the requirements of rule 56e

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that facts were not disputed because nonmovant failed to contest them with specific sworn evidence as required under rule 56e
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: once again, the ALJ failed to explain how the agency physicians’ opinions were consistent with the medical evidence or Ulloa’s activities. Indeed, it is unclear how the ALJ came to the conclusion that Ulloa’s activities, which include occasional cooking and cleaning, going to church, walking five minutes to a nearby store and doing exercises prescribed to alleviate pain, are consistent with the ability to lift twenty pounds or sit, stand or walk for up to six hours in an eight-hour day. Based on the foregoing, this Court finds that the ALJ’s RFC determination is not supported by substantial evidence because he failed to sufficiently articulate his assessment of the evidence to enable us to trace the path of his reasoning. Consequently, remand is warranted. Clifford, 227 F.3d at 870 (<HOLDING>). C. The ALJ Failed to Explain the Weight Given Options: A. holding that the alj gave inadequate reasons for rejecting wifes lay opinion testimony B. holding the record must demonstrate that the alj considered all of the evidence and the alj must discuss the evidence supporting his decision the uncontroverted evidence he chooses not to rely upon and significantly probative evidence he rejects C. holding the alj is not required to address every piece of evidence but he must articulate some legitimate reason for his decision D. recognizing that an alj must minimally articulate his reasons for crediting or rejecting evidence of disability E. recognizing that an alj has a duty to ensure that an adequate record is developed during the disability hearing consistent with the issues raised

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing that an alj must minimally articulate his reasons for crediting or rejecting evidence of disability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and sell 13,000 copies of book, but not 300,000 additional copies); Kennedy v. Nat’l Juvenile Det. Ass’n, 187 F.3d 690, 694 (7th Cir.1999) (construing “a nonexclusive license to reproduce, publish, and use Kennedy’s copyrighted report”); MacLean Assocs., Inc. v. Wm. M. Mercer-Meidinger-Hansen, Inc., 952 F.2d 769, 779 (3d Cir.1991) (finding implied nonexclusive license to develop and use software for one external account but no others). A copyright owner can grant a nonexclusive license “orally, or may even be implied from conduct.... In fact, consent given in the form of mere permission or lack of objection is also equivalent to a nonexclusive license and is not required to be in writing.” Shaver, 74 F.3d at 775; see also Jacob Maxwell, Inc. v. Veeck, 110 F.3d 749, 752 (11th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). “ ‘A licensee infringes the owner’s copyright Options: A. holding that nonexclusive license was created by the copyright owner giving permission and failing to object despite his knowledge of the use of his song B. holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting a defendants chain of custody challenge despite an officers plainly careless handling of an object recovered from the crime scene and his inability to locate the object for eight months because the officer eventually found the object in his evidence locker and was able to account for its whereabouts during the entire time period C. holding that petitioner had forfeited his right to object to psychiatric testimony by failing to raise the claim on initial appeal D. holding that statutory grounds for recusal can be waived both by failing to object and by failing to assert error on appeal E. holding that a defendant waived a sentencing issue by failing to object in district court

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that nonexclusive license was created by the copyright owner giving permission and failing to object despite his knowledge of the use of his song
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Consultant understands and agrees that the Confidential Information being provided under this Agreement is of a special and unique character and that TetraLogic has made a substantial investment in developing the information. Consultant further acknowledges that irreparable harm will result to TetraLogic in the event of Consultant’s breach, or threatened breach, of this Agreement. In such event, TetraLogic, its agents and representatives shall be entitled to specific performance and/or injunctive relief without any requirement to post a bond as a condition to remedy any such breach. Such remedy shall not be deemed to be the exclusive remedy for any such breach of this Agreement but shall be in addition to all other remedies available at law or in equity. Consultant further agrees that no failure or delay by TetraLogic, its agents, or representatives in exercising any right, power or privilege under this Agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any right, power or privilege under this Agreement. Each and all of the several rights and remedies provided for in this Agreement shall be cumulative. No one right or remedy shall be exclusive of the others or of any right or remedy allowed in law or in equity.

assistant: Remedies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in formalized testimonial materials, such as affidavits, depositions, prior testimony, or confessions,” and “statements that were made under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial,” fall within the “core class” of testimony. Id. at 51-52, 124 S.Ct. 1354. “Statements taken by police officers in the course of interrogations” are definitively “testimonial.” Id. at 52, 124 S.Ct. 1354. As the Crawford Court used the term “interrogation” in the “colloquial” and not “technical legal” sense, statements given in a formal interrogation setting at a police station and witness statements given to an investigating police officer are both considered “testimonial.” Id. at 53 n. 4, 124 S.Ct. 1354 (<HOLDING>), at 58 n. 8, 124 S.Ct. 1354 (characterizing Options: A. holding testimonial statements to include those involving a declarants knowing responses to structured questioning in an investigative environment B. holding witnesss formal signed written statement given at the police station one hour after the crime following structured police questioning was testimonial C. holding victims statement testimonial where it was elicited in response to structured police questioning pursuant to a police investigation D. holding antiassignment clause in structured settlement is enforceable E. holding that postmmmda statement knowingly given in response to structured police questioning was testimonial

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that postmmmda statement knowingly given in response to structured police questioning was testimonial
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Debtors shall pay, when due and payable, all outstanding prepetition and postpetition fees and expenses incurred by the Plan Sponsor and its advisors, including the fees of and expenses incurred by Kirkland & Ellis LLP, as counsel to the Plan Sponsor, Zack A. Clement PLLC, as local counsel to the Plan Sponsor, and any financial advisor, technical advisor, or other consultant, advisor, analyst, or other professional engaged by the Plan Sponsor in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases. If this Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, any unpaid fees and expenses shall be paid in full within five (5) Business Days of such termination. The fees and expenses owed under this section shall be entitled to administrative expense priority status.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: notwithstanding the provisions of the `` changes to terms or services '' section above , if niantic changes this `` dispute resolution '' section after the date you first accepted these terms ( or accepted any subsequent changes to these terms ) , you may reject any such change by sending us written notice ( including by email to termsofservice@nianticlabs.com ) within 30 days of the date such change became effective , as indicated in the `` last updated '' date above or in the date of niantic 's email to you notifying you of such change .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The terms of each extension of the Existing Stated Maturity Date of each credit facility or credit facilities shall be determined by the Borrower and the applicable extending Lenders and set forth in an Extension Amendment; provided that (a) the final maturity date of any extended Commitments or extended Loans shall be no earlier than the Existing Stated Maturity Date with respect to such credit facility, and (b) the interest rate margin, rate floors, fees, original issue discount and premium applicable to any extended Commitment and extended Loans shall be determined by the Borrower and the applicable extending Lenders, and (iii) the terms of the extended Commitments or extended Loans, as applicable, shall be substantially identical to the terms set forth herein (except as set forth in clauses (a) through (b) above).

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: procedures fell within the discretionary function exception and that its “judgment in deciding what tests were necessary to meet reasonable safety requirements ... require[s] a balancing of social and economic interests and a tailoring of safety requirements to local conditions.” In so holding, we noted that “ [determination of safety requirements involves a balancing of social, economic or political policies” and that “when Congress leaves the establishment and enforcement of safety standards to an agency, it intends an exercise of that discretion to fall within the discretionary function exception.” Id. at 1047-48 (citing Cunningham v. United States, 786 F.2d 1445, 1447 (9th Cir.1986)); accord Colorado Flying Academy, Inc. v. United States, 724 F.2d 871, 876-77 (10th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>). Sidestepping these cases, Airlog argues that Options: A. recognizing a discretionary function exception to that waiver B. holding that the constitution can limit the discretion of federal officials such that the ftcas discretionary function exception will not apply C. holding that the discretionary function exception may apply in the absence of a conscious decision D. holding that terminal control area design was left to the discretion of the faa designer and that competing interests were weighed and then policy decisions were made which the discretionary function exception was intended to cover E. holding that decision to establish recreational swimming area was discretionary but failure to replace buoy secured by an anchor that injured a swimmer was not within discretionary function exception

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that terminal control area design was left to the discretion of the faa designer and that competing interests were weighed and then policy decisions were made which the discretionary function exception was intended to cover
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) All amounts to be paid by the Borrower or the Servicer to the Administrative Agent, any Credit Party, any Affected Person or any Borrower Indemnified Party hereunder shall be paid no later than noon (New York City time) on the day when due in same day funds to the account so designated from time to time by such Person.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party’s obligations under this Section 3.01 shall survive the resignation or replacement of the Lender or any assignment of rights by, or the replacement of the Lender, the termination of the Commitment and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all other Obligations.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower shall, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to, execute any and all further documents, financing statements, agreements and instruments, and take all further action (including filing Uniform Commercial Code and other financing statements, notice, mortgages, deeds of trust and caveats) that may be required under applicable law, or that the Majority Lenders or the Administrative Agent may reasonably request, in accordance with the Intercreditor Agreement, in order to effectuate the transactions contemplated by the Credit Documents and in order to grant, preserve, protect and perfect the validity of the security interests created or intended to be created by the Security Documents. In the event that the Borrower or any Subsidiary is granting a Lien on any property to secure any obligations under the Term B Credit Agreement, the Borrower will, and will cause such Subsidiary to, substantially contemporaneously grant to the Administrative Agent to secure the Obligations a Lien on the same property pursuant to Security Documents in form and substance satisfactory to the Administrative Agent. Subject to the Intercreditor Agreement, such security interests and Liens will be created under the Security Documents and other security agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust and other instruments and documents in form and substance satisfactory to the Administrative Agent, and the Borrower shall deliver or cause to be delivered to the Lenders all such instruments and documents (including legal opinions, title insurance policies and lien searches) as the Administrative Agent shall reasonably request to evidence compliance with this Section .

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No provision of this Agreement shall be modified, waived or discharged unless the modification, waiver or discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by Executive and by an authorized officer of the Company (other than Executive). No waiver by either Party of any breach of, or of compliance with, any condition or provision of this Agreement by the other Party shall be considered a waiver of any other condition or provision or of the same condition or provision at another time.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: can show an “injury in fact” when he or she suffers “an invasion of a legally protected interest which is concrete and particularized, as well as actual or imminent.” Gaston Copper, 204 F.3d at 154; see also Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130. In an environmental case, the question is whether the plaintiff has suffered an injury, as opposed to whether the environment has actually been harmed. See Laidlaw, 528 U.S. at 181, 120 S.Ct. 693. Specifically, a plaintiff need only show that he used the affected area, and that he is an individual “for whom the aesthetic and recreational values of the area [are] lessened” by the defendant’s activity. Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 735, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972); see also Laidlaw, 528 U.S. at 184, 120 S.Ct. 693 (<HOLDING>); Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. at 562-63, Options: A. holding in suit under the cwa that environmental plaintiffs adequately allege injury in fact when they aver that they use the affected area and are persons for whom the aesthetic and recreational values of the area will be lessened quoting sierra club v morton 405 us at 735 92 sct 1361 B. holding that plaintiffs had established an injury in fact because the challenged activity directly affected their recreational aesthetic and economic interests C. holding that the threat of injury was not speculative because the plaintiffs had been previously charged under the challenged statute D. holding that plaintiffs alleged a sufficient injury in fact in that their members whalewatching and studying would be adversely affected by continued whale harvesting and this type of injury was within zone of interests protected by statute E. holding that plaintiffs had standing because they were directly affected by the laws and practices against which their complaints were directed

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that plaintiffs had established an injury in fact because the challenged activity directly affected their recreational aesthetic and economic interests
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: jurisdiction for more than ten days ” and convicted sex offenders are “required to ... notify the attorney general in writing of any change in name, employment, or residence address within three working days of the change ” (emphases added)). Moreover, sex offender registration requirements generally involve “actions taken by agencies the court does not control.” Nguyen, 81 Hawai'i at 288, 916 P.2d at 698. See also Sanchez v. United States, 572 F.2d 210, 211 (9th Cir.1977) (explaining that revocation of parole is collateral and not a direct consequence of guilty plea because “parole board has authority separate and distinct from that of the sentencing judge”); In re Resendiz, 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 431, 19 P.3d at 1179 (explaining that the deportation consequences do not “ine , 210 (2000) (<HOLDING>); see Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Leidig, Options: A. holding that the alaska sex offender registration act did not violate the ex post facto clause B. holding that since sex offender registration was not a direct consequence of the plea the failure to warn of such a requirement did not render the pleas unknowing or unintelligent C. holding that an inaccurate sentencing estimate did not render a plea unknowing unintelligent or involuntary because the defendant was informed of the statutory maximum D. holding that the sanction of deportation is a collateral not direct consequence of a guilty plea E. holding that the public disclosure provision of connecticuts sex offender registration law did not violate the due process clause

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that since sex offender registration was not a direct consequence of the plea the failure to warn of such a requirement did not render the pleas unknowing or unintelligent
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Schedule 7.17 sets forth a description of all insurance maintained by or on behalf of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of the Closing Date. Except as noted on Schedule 7.17 , as of the Closing Date, all premiums in respect of such insurance have been paid. The Borrower believes that the insurance maintained by or on behalf of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries is adequate.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: attracting ■ a strong candidate and raising money to support that candidate. Tidal Tr. IV, at 54:9-59:18. All of these chilling effects on speech and association — difficulty convincing voters to participate in the political process and vote, attracting strong candidates, raising money to support such candidates, and influencing elected officials — represent cognizable, and recognized, burdens on First Amendment rights. See, e.g., Anderson, 460 U.S. at 792, 103 S.Ct. 1564 (finding that plaintiff was injured by election law that made “[v]olunteers ... more difficult to recruit and retain, media publicity and campaign contributions ... more difficult to secure, and voters ... less interested in the campaign”); Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Blackwell, 462 F.3d 579, 587 (6th Cir. 2006) (<HOLDING>); Benisek v. Lamone, 266 F.Supp.3d 799, 834 (D. Options: A. holding that primary election ballot filing fee violated fourteenth amendment and noting that the primary election may be more crucial than the general election in certain parts of texas B. recognizing that electoral restrictions that affect a political partys ability to perform its primary functions organizing and developing recruiting supporters choosing a candidate and voting for that candidate in a general election can constitute severe first amendment burdens C. holding that ny elec l 2126 unconstitutionally burdens first amendment rights as applied to a party supporting a crossendorsed candidate running in another partys primary D. holding that the governor did not have to obtain the consent of the senate for the appointment of a candidate when the first candidate had been rejected by the senate the senate was not in session at the time that the second candidate was appointed and because the legislature which created and therefore controlled the office did not require by statute that the governor seek the senates approval in those circumstances E. holding candidate for house of representatives had standing to challenge election regulation exempting opponents of selffinancing candidates from certain campaigncontribution limits where plaintiff candidate had declared his candidacy and was demonstrably a selffinancing candidate whose opponents would imminently receive expanded access to campaign funding

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that electoral restrictions that affect a political partys ability to perform its primary functions organizing and developing recruiting supporters choosing a candidate and voting for that candidate in a general election can constitute severe first amendment burdens
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that ground. However, Ennis’s contention that the State did not comply with the time requirements of the Ryce Act does raise an issue that is properly the subject of a habeas petition. See Murray, 872 So.2d at 223 (noting that if the petitioner is contending that he was denied due process because the State did not comply with the statutory requirements, he may be entitled to habeas relief); Graham v. State, 826 So.2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (granting habeas relief because the respondent was being detained without a judicial finding of probable cause); Melvin v. State, 804 So.2d 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (granting habeas relief when the State had failed to provide sworn support for the commitment petition); Johnson v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 747 So.2d 402, 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (<HOLDING>); Valdez v. Moore, 745 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA Options: A. holding that habeas relief would be proper if the state failed to comply with the statutory requirement that all members of the multidisciplinary team sign the report supporting the commitment petition B. holding that a trial courts judgment must comply with the statutory requirement that the judgment contain written findings of fact and conclusions of law C. holding that a petitioner should be permitted to seek habeas review in state court even if there were doubt that the states substantive law would permit a habeas petition D. holding that consideration of a claim in a petition for habeas corpus can be barred by failure to comply with state procedural rules E. holding that the district court must resolve all claims for relief raised in a habeas petition regardless of whether habeas relief is granted or denied

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that habeas relief would be proper if the state failed to comply with the statutory requirement that all members of the multidisciplinary team sign the report supporting the commitment petition
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Grantee to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of the Plan or an Incentive Award hereunder.

assistant: Tax Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the Note embody the entire agreement between the Borrower and the Lender relating to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements, representations and understandings, if any, relating to the subject matter hereof.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 1325(b)(1) because the plan does not include the payment of interest on unsecured claims. In support of its position, the IRS argues that because § 1325(b)(1) contains language virtually identical to the phrase “value, as of the effective date of the plan,” the subsection requires the payment of interest to account for the loss of value on deferred payments paid through the plan. Additionally, the IRS argues that the plain meaning rule requires the Court to find that the words used in § 1325(b)(1) should be construed to have the same meaning as they do in other parts of the Code which do allow the payment of interest. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 241, 109 S.Ct. 1026, 1030, 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989). See also In re Rhein, 73 B.R. 285, 287 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.1987) (<HOLDING>). This Court, however, disagrees with the IRS Options: A. recognizing that the court must give meaning to all the words in the claims B. recognizing that we must give meaning to all the words in the claims C. holding that a jury could find an intent to discriminate from evidence of use of code words such as all of you and one of them the words themselves are only relevant for what they reveal the intent of the speaker D. holding that words in different sections of the same statute should be similarly construed under the canon of in pari materia E. holding that there is no reason why the words in one section in a code should have any different meaning ascribed to them than nearly identical words appearing in other sections of the same code id at 288

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that there is no reason why the words in one section in a code should have any different meaning ascribed to them than nearly identical words appearing in other sections of the same code id at 288
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the Employment Period, the Company shall pay to Employee an annualized base salary of $450,000 (the “ Base Salary ”) in consideration for Employee’s services under this Agreement, payable in substantially equal installments in conformity with the Company’s customary payroll practices for other senior executives as may exist from time to time, but no less frequently than monthly. The Base Salary shall be reviewed by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “ Compensation Committee ”) in accordance with the Company’s policies and practices, but no less frequently than once annually, and may be increased but not decreased (unless agreed to in writing by Employee). To the extent applicable, the term “Base Salary” shall include any such increases (or decreases agreed to in writing by Employee) to the Base Salary enumerated above.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of persecution without more information about the incident. This court defines persecution as punishment or the infliction of harm administered on account of a protected ground. Irasoc, 522 F.3d at 730; see Dandan v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 567, 573 (7th Cir.2004). Mere harassment is insufficient to establish persecution; a petitioner alleging persecution in the form of physical abuse must be able to point to significant harm. See Tarraf v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 525, 535 (7th Cir.2007); Tesfu v. Ashcroft, 322 F.3d 477, 481 (7th Cir.2003). And while “[cjonduet can rise to the level of persecution without being life-threatening,” we consider the frequency and severity of the harm alleged when reviewing a determination that the petitioner did not suffer persecution. Tarraf, 495 F.3d at 535 2006) (<HOLDING>); Prela v. Ashcroft, 394 F.3d 515, 518 (7th Options: A. holding that evidence of multiple interrogations and 24hour detention did not compel finding of persecution B. holding that a minor beating even in conjunction with threats did not compel a finding of persecution C. holding that evidence of kidnapping at gunpoint interrogation and beating did not compel finding of persecution D. holding that evidence of isolated incident in which government officials beat petitioner and struck him with a brick resulting in seven stitches did not compel finding of persecution E. holding that minor abuse during brief detention did not compel finding of past persecution

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that evidence of isolated incident in which government officials beat petitioner and struck him with a brick resulting in seven stitches did not compel finding of persecution
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 697 (1960), for the proposition that an individual has a justifiable expectation of privacy in a friend’s apartment. Id. at 352 n. 11, 88 S.Ct. 507. In Jones, the defendant who had a key to his friend’s apartment, where he kept a suit and shirt and may have slept a night in the past but not recently, was found to have standing to maintain a motion to suppress the fruits of a search of the apartment in part because “anyone legitimately on premises where a search occurs may challenge its legality .... ” 362 U.S. at 259, 267, 80 S.Ct. 725. Katz was decided in 1967, and was considered by Congress and the President when Title III was enacted in 1968. See, e.g., S.Rep. No. 90-1097 (1968), reprinted in 1968 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2112, 2153. Since Katz was decided, Justice Harlan’s tw 1 (1st Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). In any event, for the purpose of defining the Options: A. holding that society recognizes a reasonable expectation of privacy B. holding common areas of a storage facility not entitled to reasonable expectation of privacy because any tenant could invite anyone in C. holding that defendants had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the common areas of an apartment building D. holding that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth E. holding that captain has reasonable expectation of privacy in all areas of his ship

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that captain has reasonable expectation of privacy in all areas of his ship
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: At any time prior to the Effective Time, each party hereto may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other parties hereto, (b) to the extent permitted by Law, waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement by any other party or in any document, certificate or writing delivered pursuant hereto by any other applicable party, or (c) waive compliance with any of the covenants, agreements or conditions contained in this Agreement. Any agreement on the part of a party to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party. The failure of any party to this Agreement to assert any of its rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of such rights.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: It is understood and agreed by the Parties that money damages would be an insufficient remedy for any breach of this Amended Agreement by any Party and each non-breaching Party shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable relief (without the posting of any bond and without proof of actual damages) as a remedy of any such breach, including an order of a court of competent jurisdiction requiring any Party to comply promptly with any of its obligations hereunder. All rights, powers, and remedies provided under this Amended Agreement or otherwise available in respect hereof at law or in equity shall be cumulative and not alternative, and the exercise of any right, power, or remedy thereof by any Party shall not preclude the simultaneous or later exercise of any other such right, power, or remedy by such Party or any other Party.

assistant: Specific Performance
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: be established where the party “fall[s] within a class clearly intended to be benefited” by the contract. See Montana, 124 F.3d at 1273; see also JGB Enters., Inc. v. United States, 497 F.3d 1259, 1261 n.1 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (observing that a subcontractor was a third-party beneficiary,. where “the [contracting officer] knew or should have known that the [G]overnment’s payment on the contract was intended to directly benefit the subcontractor”). The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held that third-party beneficiary status is not established “merely because [a] contract would benefit [a party].” Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. United States, 342 F.3d 1313, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (“FDIC”); see also US Ecology, Inc. v. United States, 245 F.3d 1352, 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (<HOLDING>). Instead, “[t]hird party beneficiary status is Options: A. recognizing common law cause of action as thirdparty beneficiary B. holding that plaintiff could not prevail as a thirdparty beneficiary where contract was not valid C. holding employer thirdparty beneficiary could compel arbitration D. holding that the governments cooperation with a thirdparty is not sufficient to establish a thirdparty beneficiary relationship E. holding that the thirdparty beneficiary theory did not apply

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the governments cooperation with a thirdparty is not sufficient to establish a thirdparty beneficiary relationship
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Landlord will reimburse Tenant for all costs and expenses incurred by Tenant with respect to the design, implementation, purchase, construction and installation of the Mammoth Sign on the Building, which is to be of a similar size, quality and type as the currently existing Orange Leaf signage on the Building, after the Mammoth Sign is installed, up to but not to exceed, in any event, the sum of Seven Thousand and No/100ths Dollars ($7,000.00). Tenant shall be responsible for all such costs and expenses to the extent that they exceed the $7,000.00 amount reimbursable by Landlord to Tenant. Before commencing purchase, construction, and installation of the Mammoth Sign, Tenant must obtain Landlord’s prior written approval of the design, size, content, location and structure of the Mammoth Sign on the Building in the following manner. Prior to Tenant commencing any purchase, construction or installation of the Mammoth Sign, and as a condition to obtaining Landlord’s prior written approval of the design, content, size, location, and structure of the Mammoth Sign on the Building, Tenant must furnish Landlord with drawings, plans and specifications for the proposed Mammoth Sign and its proposed installation and location on the Building, together with the names and addresses of the contractors which will be utilized to construct and install the Mammoth Sign, copies of the necessary permits and approval, evidence of the contractors’ and subcontractors’ insurance in accordance with the requirements of Section 15 of the Lease, and the payment bond or other security, if required by Landlord, all in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Landlord. Landlord and Tenant covenant and agree that the Mammoth Sign shall be deemed to constitute a part of the Premises, for all purposes, and shall be subject to, all of the terms and conditions of Section 10 of the Lease, which pertains to the requirements imposed on Tenant with regard to maintenance and construction of alterations to the Premises. Landlord shall retain, and Tenant shall not be entitled to be paid, any portion of the Seven Thousand and No/100ths Dollars ($7,000.00) that is not expended on the installation of the Mammoth Sign pursuant to this Exhibit G .

assistant: Construction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: is different from whether they adequately plead a violation of the law of nations). Plaintiffs cite to several documents of international consensus that prohibit the modern forms of forced labor alleged in the FAC. (FAC ¶ 170.) Plaintiffs also point to numerous international conventions which prohibit human trafficking. (Id.) Numerous courts within the United States have found trafficking, forced labor, and involuntary servitude cognizable under ATS. See, e.g., Licea v. Curacao Drydock Co., Inc., 584 F.Supp.2d 1355 (S.D.Fla.2008) (finding that alleged forced labor and international human trafficking of plaintiff by operator of a drydock facility constituted violations of international law); In re World War II Era Japanese Forced Labor Litigation, 164 F.Supp.2d 1160, 1179 (N.D.Cal.2001) (<HOLDING>); Doe v. Unocal Corp., 963 F.Supp. 880, 892 Options: A. holding forced stomach pumping shocks the conscience and violates substantive due process B. holding that state law claim regarding breach of settlement agreement was preempted by federal labor law C. holding that state law fraud claims are preempted by the federal labor law duty of fair representation D. holding that forced labor violates the law of nations E. holding plaintiff must charge that the alleged breach violates a contract between two labor organizations

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that forced labor violates the law of nations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may not be assigned by the Company (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of each of the Investors, provided, however, that in the event that the Company is a party to a merger, consolidation, share exchange or similar business combination transaction in which the Common Stock is converted into the equity securities of another Person, from and after the effective time of such transaction, such Person shall, by virtue of such transaction, be deemed to have assumed the obligations of the Company hereunder, the term “Company” shall be deemed to refer to such Person and the term “Registrable Securities” shall be deemed to include the securities received by the Investors in connection with such transaction unless such securities are otherwise freely tradable by the Investors after giving effect to such transaction.

assistant: Assignments