flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: can prevail under Ebel’s balancing test. We are not convinced. Nothing in the Constitution forbids municipalities from requiring non-conforming uses to close, change their business, or relocate within a reasonable time period. Here, as in Baby Tam & Co. v. City of Las Vegas, 247 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir.2001), World Wide “furnishes no authority for the proposition that a zoning ordinance may not prohibit a use in existence before its enactment,” id. at 1006. As a general matter, an amortization period is insufficient only if it puts a business in an impossible position due to a shortage of relocation sites. This issue is conceptually indistinguishable from the First Amendment requirement of alternative avenues of communication. See Jake’s, Ltd. v. City of Coates, 284 F.3d 884, 889 (8th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 948, 123 S.Ct. 413, Options: A. holding that form 1040 complies with pra B. holding that a contract need not have mutuality of obligation as long as it is supported by consideration C. holding that once consent to settlement agreement is withdrawn agreement can only be enforced as a binding contract that complies with rule 11 as established by proper pleading and proof D. holding that rcw 3712010 complies with public law 280 and is constitutional E. holding that application of an amortization provision is constitutional as long as it complies with renton

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that application of an amortization provision is constitutional as long as it complies with renton
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: None of the execution, delivery or performance of this Agreement will: (a) violate any provision of the certificate of incorporation or by-laws of Number Holdings or any organizational documents of any of its Subsidiaries; (b) violate any provision of law, rule, regulation, injunction, judgment, order, decree, ruling, charge or other restriction of any Governmental Authority to which Number Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries is subject; or (c) violate, be in conflict with, constitute a default (upon notice, lapse of time or both) under, give rise to a right of termination or renegotiation under any material contract of Number Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: feedback is provided on a non-confidential basis , and the company is not under any obligation to keep any feedback you send confidential or to refrain from using or disclosing it in any way ;

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties on separate counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute but one and the same Agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Agreement by telefacsimile or other electronic method of transmission shall be equally as effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Agreement. Any party delivering an executed counterpart of this Agreement by telefacsimile or other electronic method of transmission also shall deliver an original executed counterpart of this Agreement but the failure to deliver an original executed counterpart shall not affect the validity, enforceability, and binding effect of this Agreement. The foregoing shall apply to each other Loan Document mutatis mutandis .

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Consultant acknowledges and agrees that he will not defame or publicly criticize the services, business, integrity, veracity or personal or professional reputation of the Company or any affiliate and any of their officers, directors, partners, employees, or agents thereof in either a professional or personal manner.

assistant: Non-Disparagement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Use the proceeds of all Loans to finance working capital needs, Permitted Acquisitions, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries. No part of the proceeds of any Loan will be used, whether directly or indirectly, for any purpose that would violate any rule or regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, including Regulations T, U or X. All Letters of Credit will be used for general corporate purposes.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: questioning of prospective jurors to expose faults that would render a juror ineligible. No abuse of discretion is apparent, and, therefore, this proposition of law is overruled. State v. Dennis, 683 N.E.2d at 1105. The district court held that the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established United States Supreme Court case law. Dennis v. Mitchell, 68 F.Supp.2d at 890. As the Supreme Court observed in Morgan, “[t]he Constitution ... does not dictate a catechism for voir dire, but only that the defendant be afforded an impartial jury.” Morgan, 504 U.S. at 729, 112 S.Ct. 2222. At the same time, integral to the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury “is an adequate vo 476 U.S. 28, 106 S.Ct. 1683, 90 L.Ed.2d 27 (1986) (<HOLDING>). By contrast, the Supreme Court has ruled that Options: A. holding to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination a plaintiff must show he 1 B. holding that racial discrimination is a personal injury tort C. holding that voir dire regarding racial bias was constitutionally required in case involving interracial violence D. holding that the employers routine use of racial slurs constitutes direct evidence that racial animus was a motivating factor in the contested disciplinary decisions E. holding as relevant in a murder case a history of domestic violence involving defendant and his victim

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that voir dire regarding racial bias was constitutionally required in case involving interracial violence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall reimburse the Investor or its designee(s) for all costs and expenses incurred by it or its affiliates in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents (including, without limitation, all legal fees and disbursements in connection therewith, structuring, documentation and implementation of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents and due diligence and regulatory filings in connection therewith) in an amount up to $25,000, which amount shall be withheld by the Investor from the Purchase Price at the Closing or paid by the Company on demand by the Investor if the Investor terminates its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with Section 7 (as the case may be). The Company shall be responsible for the payment of any placement agent’s fees, financial advisory fees, transfer agent fees, DTC fees or broker’s commissions (other than for Persons engaged by the Investor) relating to or arising out of the transactions contemplated hereby. The Company shall pay, and hold the Investor harmless against, any liability, loss or expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and out-of-pocket expenses) arising in connection with any claim relating to any such payment. Except as otherwise set forth in the Transaction Documents, each party to this Agreement shall bear its own expenses in connection with the sale of the Securities to the Investor.

assistant: Fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Schedule 3.19 lists as of the date of this Agreement, all Contracts between or among the Companies, on the one hand, and (a) Seller or any other Affiliate of Seller or (b) any officer, director or employee of Seller or any other Affiliate of Seller (other than any Plan and company indemnity obligations), on the other hand.

assistant: Transactions With Affiliates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: the material and all other content on this service may not otherwise be copied , reproduced , republished , uploaded , posted , transmitted , distributed , or used in any way unless specifically authorized by viber .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: accruing up through August 24, 1999 made use of no secret information or information generated in post-1999 litigation. The same calculations of the extent of MPC's liability to plaintiffs could have been made by MPC at any time following the verdict of the Gunn jury. 6 . Arguing by analogy, MPC relies on Willet v. Penn. Med. Catastrophe Loss Fund, 549 Pa. 613, 702 A.2d 850 (1997), as authority for bringing a contribution or indemnity action against the CAT. MPC acknowledges that Wiliet is not precisely on-point and "respectfully requests that this [C]ourt extend the holding in Wiliet.” MPC Br. at 27. We decline the invitation. Such ambitious developments in Pennsylvania insurance law must come from Pennsylvania’s courts. See Vargus v. Pitman Mfg. Co., 675 F.2d 73, 76 (3d Cir. 1982) (<HOLDING>) (footnote omitted); cf. Burris Chemical, Inc. Options: A. holding that we will overturn the factual findings of the district court only where we have a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed B. holding that our use of the subjunctive in mentioning an argument in passing suggests that we knew that we were not addressing and that we could not address that argument C. holding that when we do not know why the district court refused to depart we assume that the district court knew and applied the law correctly rather than that it erroneously thought itself without discretion internal quotations and alterations omitted D. holding the district courts noconsent finding was not clearly erroneous because the individual felt she was under arrest and had to submit to the patdown search in part based on the officers saying this is what we do we talk to people we search peoples bags we pat search people this is what we do everyday E. holding that the nonprevailing party in district court proceedings here is asking that we anticipate the birth of a state law doctrine in the womb of time but whose birth is distant we have been asked to deliver prematurely a new doctrine of pennsylvania tort law and as a federal court we are unwilling to do so

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the nonprevailing party in district court proceedings here is asking that we anticipate the birth of a state law doctrine in the womb of time but whose birth is distant we have been asked to deliver prematurely a new doctrine of pennsylvania tort law and as a federal court we are unwilling to do so
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Buyer and in the event of assignment by Buyer of its rights and obligations hereunder, each holder of Notes, shall have all rights and remedies set forth in the Transaction Documents and all rights and remedies which such holders have been granted at any time under any other agreement or contract and all of the rights which such holders have under any law. Any Person having any rights under any provision of this Agreement shall be entitled to enforce such rights specifically (without posting a bond or other security), to recover damages by reason of any breach of any provision of this Agreement and to exercise all other rights granted by law. Furthermore, the Company recognizes that in the event that it or any Subsidiary fails to perform, observe, or discharge any or all of its or such Subsidiary’s (as the case may be) obligations under the Transaction Documents, any remedy at law would inadequate relief to the Buyers. The Company therefore agrees that the Buyers shall be entitled to specific performance and/or temporary, preliminary and permanent injunctive or other equitable relief from any court of competent jurisdiction in any such case without the necessity of proving actual damages and without posting a bond or other security. The remedies provided in this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents shall be cumulative and in addition to all other remedies available under this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents, at law or in equity (including a decree of specific performance and/or other injunctive relief).

assistant: Remedies
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Plan shall be effective from and after the Effective Date and shall continue in effect until amended or terminated as provided in Article 7; provided, however, that if a Change in Control, as defined in the MTS Systems Corporation Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, shall occur during the term of this Plan, the separate Executive Change in Control Severance Plan shall thereafter be effective and supersede this Plan to the extent provided in that Plan.

assistant: Effective Dates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices or requests or consents provided for by, or permitted to be given pursuant to, this Agreement must be in writing and must be given by depositing same in the United States mail, addressed to the Person to be notified, postpaid, and registered or certified with return receipt requested or by delivering such notice in person or by facsimile to such Party. Notice given by personal delivery or mail shall be effective upon actual receipt. Notice given by facsimile shall be effective upon actual receipt if received during the recipient’s normal business hours or at the beginning of the recipient’s next business day after receipt if not received during the recipient’s normal business hours. All notices to be sent to a Party pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent to or made at the address set forth below or at such other address as such Party may stipulate to the other Parties in the manner provided in this Section 9.2 .

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and all questions concerning the construction, validity, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by, the laws of the state of Delaware, without giving effect to provisions thereof regarding conflict of laws.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: would apply equally to them. 6 . Windsor's status as State & County's rein-surer has been recognized by this court and the Thirteenth Court of Appeals. State & County, 988 S.W.2d at 329; Windsor, 923 S.W.2d at 96. 7 . Although Miller raises four issues related to the sanctions order, his argument only addresses one distinct sanction complaint. Thus, we will consider only the complaint argued. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.1(e), (h); Windsor, 923 S.W.2d at 93. 8 . We do not agree with Miller’s assertion that the trial court’s order does not set forth the particulars of the good cause justifying the sanctions. The order, along with the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, clearly specifies the particular acts upon which the sanctions order was based. Cf. Chancey, 942 S.W.2d at 155 Options: A. holding that five alleged incidents in four years were too few too separate in time and too mild to create an abusive working environment B. holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees C. holding sanctions order not final where the amount of sanctions had not yet been determined D. holding sanctions order was too general to support award E. holding prayer for general relief does not support award of attorneys fees

assistant: The best answer is D. holding sanctions order was too general to support award
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In the event that any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to delegate arbitrability to an arbitrator are not so favored. Indeed, as previously discussed, delegation clauses must meet the "clear and unmistakable” test because determining arbitrability is typically a task reserved for courts, not arbitrators. Thus, a term that requires drivers to pay significant fees just to get a threshold determination on arbitrability renders the delegation clause far more substantively unconscionable, and thus unenforceable. 50 . Mohamed drove for Uber in Boston, not California. 51 . The samé rationale likely undergirds Armendariz’s holding that a party cannot render a contract conscionable by agreeing to strike or otherwise limit the application of an unconscionable term after litigation has begun. See Armendariz, 24 Cal.4th at 125, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 745 (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added). If the Supreme Court was not Options: A. holding arbitration clause in credit card agreement unconscionable B. holding that arbitration provisions that preclude class actions are not unconscionable C. holding arbitration provision of automobile installment sales agreement unconscionable D. holding that an arbitration clause was not unconscionable because it did not unreasonably favor the defendants E. holding that a later concession to strike an unconscionable term does not change the fact that the arbitration agreement as written is unconscionable and contrary to public policy

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a later concession to strike an unconscionable term does not change the fact that the arbitration agreement as written is unconscionable and contrary to public policy
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Raymond Mendez appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Mendez first contends that the district court erred in concluding that Mendez is ineligible for a sentence reduction under section 3582(c)(2). This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 673 (9th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>). Here, the district court appropriately found Options: A. holding that a defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction under section 3582c2 when the application of that amendment does not result in a lower sentencing range B. holding a reduction in defendants sentence as a career offender was not authorized under 3582c2 because amendment 706 did not lower his applicable guideline range under the careeroffender guidelines C. holding that the recent amendment to the crack cocaine guidelines does not qualify defendant for a sentencing reduction under 3582c2 because defendant was originally sentenced pursuant to the guideline range for career offenders D. holding that 3582c2 does not authorize a resentencing but merely provides for a sentence reduction within the bounds established by the sentencing commission and that booker does not apply to 3582c2 proceedings E. holding reduction of sentence under 3582c2 based on amendment not listed in 1b110c is not authorized

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction under section 3582c2 when the application of that amendment does not result in a lower sentencing range
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties (i) submit to the jurisdiction of the state courts of New York and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the purpose of any suit, action or other proceeding arising out of or based upon this Agreement, (ii) agree not to commence any suit, action or other proceeding arising out of or based upon this Agreement except in state courts of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (iii) hereby waive, and agree not to assert, by way of motion, as a defense, or otherwise, in any such suit, action or proceeding, any claim that it is not subject personally to the jurisdiction of the above-named courts, that its property is exempt or immune from attachment or execution, that the suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum, that the venue of the suit, action or proceeding is improper or that this Agreement or the subject matter hereof may not be enforced in or by such court.

assistant: Jurisdictions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower has disclosed to the Lenders all agreements, instruments and corporate or other restrictions to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is subject, and all other matters known to it, that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Information Memorandum nor any of the other reports, financial statements, certificates or other information furnished by or on behalf of the Borrower to the Administrative Agent or any Lender in connection with the negotiation of this Agreement or delivered hereunder (as modified or supplemented by other information so furnished) contains or will contain any material misstatement of fact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided that, with respect to projected financial information, the Borrower represents only that such information was prepared in good faith based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Employer shall have the right to deduct from all amounts paid to a Participant in cash (whether under this Plan or otherwise) any amount required by law to be withheld in respect of Awards under this Plan as may be necessary in the opinion of the Employer to satisfy any applicable tax withholding requirements under the laws of any country, state, province, city or other jurisdiction, including but not limited to income taxes, capital gains taxes, transfer taxes, and social security contributions that are required by law to be withheld. In the case of payments of Awards in the form of Stock, at the Committee’s discretion, the Participant shall be required to either pay to the Employer the amount of any taxes required to be withheld with respect to such Stock or, in lieu thereof, the Employer shall have the right to retain (or the Participant may be offered the opportunity to elect to tender) the number of shares of Stock whose Fair Market Value equals such amount required to be withheld provided however that such amount may not exceed the maximum statutory withholding rate.

assistant: Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile or electronic signatures shall constitute original signatures for all purposes of this Agreement.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement represents the entire agreement and understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements, whether written or oral, with respect thereto, including, without limitation Executive’s offer letter from the Company dated March 3, 2014.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: because of the fear that their results would become public knowledge. § 381.004(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). The specific safeguards provided by the statute to prevent disclosure lend weight to the argument that public dissemination of the test results would cause emotional distress, and thus Continental should have known that by sending the results in an unsecured fax, it was risking causing great emotional distress to the Abrils if an unauthorized party saw the test results. Because the only reasonable damages arising from a breach of section 381.004(3)(f) are emotional distress, and because this emotional damage would be akin to that suffered by victims of defamation or invasion of privacy, we conclude they should not be barred by the impact rule. See Gracey, 837 So.2d at 356-57 (<HOLDING>). Thus, based on our recent precedent in Gracey Options: A. holding that the victim impact and victim vulnerability aggravators were not overbroad and explaining that though the concepts of victim impact and victim vulnerability may well be relevant in every case evidence of victim vulnerability and victim impact in a particular case is inherently individualized B. holding in a fcra case that plaintiffs may not rely on mere conclusory statements rather they must sufficiently articulate true demonstrable emotional distress including the factual context in which the emotional distress arose evidence corroborating the testimony of the plaintiff the nexus between the conduct of the defendant and the emotional distress the degree of such mental distress mitigating circumstances if any physical injuries suffered due to the emotional distress medical attention resulting from the emotional duress psychiatric or psychological treatment and the loss of income if any C. holding that the impact rule should not bar recovery because the emotional distress that plaintiffs allege they have suffered is at least equal to that typically suffered by the victim of a defamation or an invasion of privacy and that ijmposition of the impact rule in this context would render the legislative intent and its statutory implementation meaningless and without substance D. holding emotional distress suffered must be severe and not trivial E. holding that employee could not state a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress under fela without a showing of physical impact

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the impact rule should not bar recovery because the emotional distress that plaintiffs allege they have suffered is at least equal to that typically suffered by the victim of a defamation or an invasion of privacy and that ijmposition of the impact rule in this context would render the legislative intent and its statutory implementation meaningless and without substance
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Employee shall be employed in the position of Senior Vice President Product Development and Executive Officer. Employee shall (a) perform all duties incident to such offices, and (b) perform such other tasks, consistent with Employee’s position with the Company, as may from time to time be assigned to Employee by his/her supervisor.

assistant: Duties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: B 11112-3. This language could be read to state that the USPS intended to move out of the old Brightmoor Station Post Office some date after signing Settlement Agreement I. When viewed in the context of the dealings of the parties, it is clear that Settlement Agreement I was to extinguish the leasehold estate on November 30, 2000 and surrender the old Brightmoor Station Post Office on that date, particularly because an express provision of the Agreement terminated the lease effective November 30, 2000. See PI. PFF Ex. B 114 (“The parties have mutually agreed to terminate the lease ... effective November 30, 2000.”); see also Beall, 94 U.S. at 389 (defining “surrender” as “the yielding up the estate to the landlord, so that the leasehold interest becom 80 N.Y.S. 247 (N.Y.App.Div.1903) (<HOLDING>). Finally, Plaintiff contends that the USPS did Options: A. holding that the tenant was not a holdover tenant despite retaining keys because the tenant recognized the termination of the tenancy relinquished possession of the premises and the landlord was able to gain access to the property B. holding that where the landlord was aware the tenant had moved out a tenant who attached a lock to the door and accidentally retained the keys to the lock was not a holdover tenant C. holding that where the will did not provide the life tenant with the power to sell and it was not necessary to sell the property for the payment of estate expenses the life tenant was not entitled to the proceeds from the sale of the property instead the proceeds became a part of the residuary estate D. holding the landlord did not trespass when his agent entered the premises for the purpose of showing them to a potential tenant E. holding that a subcontracting agreement was not for the direct benefit of the tenant where the tenant was merely listed in titles on construction drawings and the indemnification provisions did not identify any third parties

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that where the landlord was aware the tenant had moved out a tenant who attached a lock to the door and accidentally retained the keys to the lock was not a holdover tenant
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Failure or delay of either party to insist upon compliance with any provision of this Agreement will not operate as and is not to be construed to be a waiver or amendment of the provision or the right of the aggrieved party to insist upon compliance with the provision or to take remedial steps to recover damages or other relief for noncompliance. Any express waiver of any provision of this Agreement will not operate, and is not to be construed, as a waiver of any subsequent breach, irrespective of whether occurring under similar or dissimilar circumstances. You may not assign any of your rights under this Agreement. The rights and obligations of the Company under this Agreement shall benefit and bind the successors and assigns of the Company. The Company agrees that if it assigns this Agreement to any successor company, it will ensure that its terms are continued.

assistant: Miscellaneous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The term of this Agreement shall be for a period commencing on January 1, 2017 (the “ Effective Date ”) and ending on December 20, 2017 (the “ Initial Term ”), provided, however, that this Agreement shall automatically be extended for an additional one-year period at the end of the Initial Term and each one-year anniversary thereafter (each a “ Renewal Term ” and together with the Initial Term being referred to herein as the “ Employment Term ”), unless not later than one-hundred eighty (180) days prior to the end of the then-current period, either the Key Employee or the Company shall have provided written notice to the other party that it does not wish to extend this Agreement; provided, further, that if there occurs a Change in Control during the Employment Term, the Employment Term shall automatically be extended for an additional one-year period (in addition to any then remaining Initial Term or a Renewal Term, as applicable).

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As regards any Collateral, Borrower shall maintain a standard and modern system of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or such other accounting principles as agreed to by Lender, consistently applied. Borrower’s Books shall be accurate and complete. On Lender’s request, Borrower shall deliver to Lender copies of Borrower’s Books.

assistant: Records
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: g ) remove , alter or replace any notices of authorship , trade marks , business names , logos or other designations of origin on the skyscanner services and/or skyscanner platforms or pass off or attempt to pass off the skyscanner services and/or skyscanner platforms as the product of anyone other than skyscanner ;

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Executive shall be reimbursed on not less than a monthly basis for all reasonable, ordinary and necessary expenses incurred by him in connection with the performance of his duties hereunder or for promoting, pursuing or otherwise furthering the business or interests of the Company (including but not limited to travel costs, dining and entertainment), in each case in accordance with policies established by the Board from time to time in effect and upon receipt of appropriate documentation of such expenses.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that Bosch’s conduct was “wanton, reckless or malicious.” JA. 454. We find that, regardless of merit of Sanders’ complaints, any error in the district court’s instruction was harmless because, even under the preponderance standard, the jury would not have concluded that punitive damages were appropriate. There is scant evidence that any Bosch employees ever listened to any of Sanders’ conversations and no evidence that the substance of any of Sanders’ conversations was ever disseminated. Nor does the evidence suggest that the recording was ill-motivated. We do not believe, therefore, that the judge’s instructions to the jury, whether they were erroneous or not, in any way affected the jury’s resolution of the punitive damages question. Cf. Deal v. Spears, .supra, 980 F.2d at 1159 (<HOLDING>). IV. The judgment of the district court is Options: A. holding that where there was no evidence that taped conversations were repeated verbatim or that anything but vague substance was revealed district court did not err in denying punitive damages noted the court it is difficult to conceive of a case less appropriate for punitive damages than this one B. holding without discussion of the punitive damages issue that judgment for embezzlement which included actual and punitive damages was nondischargeable C. holding that punitive damages are not fines D. holding that even if the trial court had erred in denying the defendants motion for a directed verdict on punitive damages the error was harmless because the jury found in favor of the defendant and never reached the punitive damages claims E. holding a court may not award punitive damages

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that where there was no evidence that taped conversations were repeated verbatim or that anything but vague substance was revealed district court did not err in denying punitive damages noted the court it is difficult to conceive of a case less appropriate for punitive damages than this one
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: To Borrower’s knowledge, each Loan Party and each Subsidiary thereof is in compliance in all material respects with the requirements of all laws and all orders, writs, injunctions and decrees applicable to it or to its properties, except in such instances in which (a) such requirement of law or order, writ, injunction or decree is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted or (b) the failure to comply therewith, either individually or in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No Transaction Document or provision thereof may be waived, amended or modified except, in the case of this Agreement, by an agreement or agreements in writing executed by Borrower and the Lender or, in the case of any other Transaction Document, by an agreement or agreements in writing entered into by the parties thereto with the prior written consent of the Lender.

assistant: Modifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument. A set of counterparts executed by all the parties hereto shall be lodged with the Parent Borrower and the Administrative Agent.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: he feared that he would be harmed if returned to Cóte d’Ivoire because of his former involvement with t that military forces continued to look for him or have any interest in harming him after 2005, or that former UDPCI members continued to face harm. Thus, given that Attobra did not provide any objective evidence that authorities in Cote d’Ivoire continued to look for him or have any interest in him, the agency reasonably concluded that Attobra failed to establish the requisite objective likelihood of future harm. See Jian Xing Huang v. INS, 421 F.3d 125, 129 (2d Cir.2005) (finding that a fear of future persecution is not objectively reasonable if it lacks “solid support” in the record and is merely “speculative at best”); Hongsheng Leng v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 135, 142 (2d Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). For the foregoing reasons, the petition for Options: A. holding that to establish asylum eligibility based on future persecution an applicant must show that he or she subjectively fears persecution and that this fear is objectively reasonable B. holding that a showing of past persecution creates a rebuttable presumption of future persecution C. holding that absent past persecution an alien can demonstrate eligibility for asylum based on a wellfounded fear of future persecution by demonstrating that he or she subjectively fears persecution and that this fear is objectively reasonable D. holding that absent a pattern of persecution linked to the applicant persecution of family members is insufficient to demonstrate a wellfounded fear of persecution E. holding that to show an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution an applicant must establish that he would be singled out for persecution or that there was a pattern or practice of persecution of similarlysituated individuals

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that to show an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution an applicant must establish that he would be singled out for persecution or that there was a pattern or practice of persecution of similarlysituated individuals
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) The unpaid principal amount of each Base Rate Loan shall bear interest from the date of the Borrowing thereof until maturity (whether by acceleration or otherwise) at a rate per annum which shall at all times be the Applicable Margin plus the Base Rate in effect from time to time.

assistant: Interests
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (i) The following entities are not subsidiaries of the Borrower: (1) World X Change Asia Co Ltd., (2) SunEdison Residential 1 Ltd., (3) GreenMountain Wind, LLC and (4) Master Development Corona CA and (ii) the following entities have no assets other than de minimis assets: (1) Passadumkeag Wind Holdings, LLC and (2) Idaho Solar Holdings, LLC.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in original) (citations omitted) (quoting United States v. Patane, 304 F.3d 1013, 1018 (10th Cir. 2002), rev’d on other grounds, 542 U.S. 630, 124 S.Ct. 2620, 159 L.Ed.2d 667 (2004))). As for the suggestion that Defendants were obliged to contact Plaintiffs physician, such a requirement goes beyond the holdings of Cortez, Lusby, and Baptiste, each of which required officers to interview readily available witnesses or otherwise review readily available exculpatory evidence. See Cortez, 478 F.3d at 1117 (“[Wlitnesses were readily available for interviews. ... Defendants, however, did not ... interview the girl [who may have been molested by the arrestee], her mother, the nurse, or the doctor.... In other words, Defendants conducted no investigation.”); Baptiste, 147 F.3d at 1259 (<HOLDING>); Lusby, 749 F.2d at 1431 (faulting officer for Options: A. holding that officers could not rely on security guards statements that arrestee had shoplifted where easily accessible video showed their account was inaccurate B. holding that the trustee could not avoid a security interest under section 549 when that security interest was authorized by the bankruptcy court C. holding an insurer has a right to rely on statements made in an insurance application D. holding that statements not protected where the defendants had no basis for their optimistic statements and already knew allegedly that certain risks had become reality E. holding that where defendants failed to present rebuttal evidence the court was allowed to rely on the psrs finding that their false statements significantly impeded the investigation

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that officers could not rely on security guards statements that arrestee had shoplifted where easily accessible video showed their account was inaccurate
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and demands of every kind shall be personally delivered or sent by first class mail to the parties at the addresses appearing below or at such other addresses as either party may designate in writing, delivered or mailed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Any such notice or demand shall be effective immediately upon personal delivery or three (3) days after deposit in the United States mail, as the case may be.

assistant: Notices