flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All of Seller’s right, title and interest in and to all presently effective and assignable warranties, guaranties, representations or covenants given to or made in favor of Seller in connection with the acquisition, development, construction, maintenance, repair, renovation or inspection of any of the Property, including any made under any roof warranties, any construction contracts and any service or maintenance contracts.

assistant: Warranties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS AGREEMENT OF DEFINITIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY OTHERWISE APPLICABLE PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS (OTHER THAN SECTION 5-1401 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATION LAW).

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: It is expressly agreed that the remedy at law for breach of the obligations of the Members set forth in this Section 15.1 is inadequate in view of (i) the complexities and uncertainties in measuring the actual damage to be sustained by reason of the failure of a Member to comply fully with such obligations, and (ii) the uniqueness of the Company’s business and the Members’ relationships. Accordingly, each of such obligations shall be, and is hereby expressly made, enforceable by an order of specific performance.

assistant: Enforcements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall not, and shall use its best efforts to ensure that no affiliate of the Company shall, after the date hereof, sell, offer for sale or solicit offers to buy or otherwise negotiate in respect of any security that would be integrated with the Exchange Securities or Conversion Securities in a manner that would require the registration under the Securities Act of the Exchange Securities or Conversion Securities.

assistant: Integration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: at an insurance office, a question arises whether Title III of the ADA has any application. See Leonard F., 967 F.Supp. at 806 (suggesting that "Title III of the ADA is not applicable to employee benefits,” and that "the plain meaning and legislative history of the ADA make[ ] clear that claims of discrimination in employee benefits are covered by Title I, not Title III”). While we have recently held in Pallozzi v. Allstate Life Ins. Co., 198 F.3d 28 (2d Cir.1999), that an insurance office in its dealings with the public is a “place of public accommodation” and is regulated by Title III, it does not necessarily follow that Title Ill is implicated when an insurance company issues a disability policy to an employer for the benefit of its employees. See, e.g., Ford 145 F.3d at 612-13 (<HOLDING>); Parker 121 F.3d at 1011 (same). (Were the Options: A. holding that trial court was not required to conclude that wife was disabled for alimony purposes where she testified about her disability and offered documentation of her social security disability benefits but where she produced no medical testimony and where other evidence indicated that she was otherwise active and did not stay in bed all day as she claimed B. holding that because plaintiff received her disability benefits via her employment and had no nexus to defendants insurance office she was not discriminated against in connection with a public accommodation and therefore could not state a claim under title iii C. holding that threatening employee to mind her own business investigating her videotaping her without her permission and forcing her to take polygraph could not be considered adverse employment actions because they had no effect on conditions of employment D. holding that an employee who claims to have been terminated by her employer for having exercised her right to disability benefits raised a cognizable claim under 510 of erisa notwithstanding the fact that she received the benefits from her employer prior to termination E. holding that insurance company administering employerprovided disability plan was not place of public accommodation under ada because employees received their benefits through employment not through a public accommodation

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that because plaintiff received her disability benefits via her employment and had no nexus to defendants insurance office she was not discriminated against in connection with a public accommodation and therefore could not state a claim under title iii
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: References in this Agreement to any gender include references to all genders, and references to the singular include references to the plural and vice versa. The words “include,” “includes” and “including” when used in this Agreement shall be deemed to be followed by the phrase “without limitation.” Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Agreement to Articles, Sections, Exhibits and Schedules shall be deemed references to Articles and Sections of, and Exhibits and Schedules to, this Agreement. Unless the context otherwise requires, the words “hereof,” “hereby” and “herein” and words of similar meaning when used in this Agreement refer to this Agreement in its entirety and not to any particular Article, Section or provision of this Agreement. The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Any reference to any Law shall be deemed also to refer to all rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, unless the context requires otherwise.

assistant: Interpretations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The closing of the Contemplated Transactions (the “ Closing ”) will be held by electronic exchange of documents (a) on the date of this Agreement, or (b) such other time and place as the Parties may agree (the “ Closing Date ”).

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of testimony interpreting drug code words, such expert testimony may unfairly provide the government with an additional summation by having the expert interpret the evidence, and may come dangerously close to invading the province of the jury.” Emmanuel, 565 F.3d at 1335-36. Given the extensive recordings and the length of Agent Bryant’s investigation, Mallety has not shown that the district court plainly erred by failing to exclude any of Agent Bryant’s testimony. First, the district court did not err by permitting Agent Bryant to give her opinion as to the meaning of specific terms, such as numbers, that Mallety and others used in the recorded conversations. An expert witness may testify to the meaning of specific terms used in recorded conversations. Emmanuel, 565 F.3d at 1336 (<HOLDING>); Brown, 872 F.2d at 392 (holding that the Options: A. holding juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony B. holding that the district court did not err by admitting an expert law enforcement officers testimony that the codes and jargon heard in the defendants recorded conversations referred to drug trafficking C. holding that the district court committed prejudicial error in admitting expert testimony about the structure of drug trafficking organizations because the testimony portrayed the defendant as a member of such an organization and implied the defendant knew the drugs were in his vehicle D. holding admissible police officers testimony that firearms are commonly used in drug trafficking E. holding that the trial court did not err by refusing to ask whether prospective jurors would place a greater amount of weight upon the testimony of law enforcement officers over that of the defendants

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the district court did not err by admitting an expert law enforcement officers testimony that the codes and jargon heard in the defendants recorded conversations referred to drug trafficking
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Parties other than the Company hereby consent to the Reincorporation and, pursuant to Section 11.06 of the Acquisition Agreement, the assignment by operation of law of the Company’s rights and obligations under the Acquisition Agreement to its successor domiciled in the State of Maryland.

assistant: Consents
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws of such State. The Company and Indemnitee each hereby irrevocably consent to the jurisdiction of the Chancery Court of the State of Delaware for all purposes in connection with any action or proceeding which arises out of or relates to this Agreement, waive all procedural objections to suit in that jurisdiction, including without limitation objections as to venue or inconvenience, agree that service in any such action may be made by notice given in accordance with Section 7 and also agree that any action instituted under this Agreement shall be brought only in the Chancery Court of the State of Delaware.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “Clipper” is descriptive and not generic, as adopted by the district court, to be clearly erroneous. Judgment reversed and remanded with directions to dissolve the preliminary injunction and to dismiss the complaint. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 1 . Under section 45 of the Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988, "the term ‘service mark' means any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof— ... [used] to identify and distinguish the services of one person ... from the services of others and to indicate the source of the services....” 15 U.S.C. § 1127 (1988). 2 . The district court stayed the issuance of the preliminary injunction for 90 days during pend-ency of an expedited appeal. 3 . See also Miller Brewing Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., 561 F.2d 75 (7th Cir.1977) Options: A. holding the same with respect to an apartment B. holding to that effect with respect to rule 64 C. holding any claim that alleges generic manufacturers should have acted differently with respect to warnings is preempted D. holding lite generic when used with respect to low calorie mild tasting beer E. holding that under privacy act federal government waived its sovereign immunity with respect to actual damages but not with respect to damages for mental or emotional distress

assistant: The best answer is D. holding lite generic when used with respect to low calorie mild tasting beer
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower will indemnify each Recipient, within 10 days after written demand therefor, for the full amount of Indemnified Taxes (including, without limitation, any Indemnified Taxes imposed on amounts payable under this Section 2.12(c) ) paid by such Recipient or required to be withheld or deducted from a payment to such Recipient and any interest and reasonable expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, whether or not such Indemnified Taxes were correctly or legally asserted. A certificate as to the amount of such payment or liability delivered to the Borrower by a Lender (with a copy to the Administrative Agent) or by the Administrative Agent on its own behalf or on behalf of a Lender shall be conclusive absent manifest error. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, a Recipient shall not be indemnified for any Indemnified Taxes under this Section 2.12 unless such Recipient shall make written demand on Borrower for such reimbursement no later than one year after the earlier of (i) the date on which the relevant Governmental Authority makes written demand upon such Recipient for such Indemnified Taxes and (ii) the date on which such Recipient has made payment of such Indemnified Taxes to the relevant Governmental Authority.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Although the farmer did not act negligently, he did set the fire. See also Department of Health v. Concrete Specialties, Inc., 112 N.J.Super. 407, 410, 271 A.2d 595 (App.Div.1970) (finding that defendant whose equipment caused smoke to be emitted into air violated regulation promulgated under APCA because defendant allowed and permitted emission of smoke). But the fire here was started by an unknown third person. Alden Leeds did nothing to cause the fire. There is no evidence that Alden Leeds either by an affirmative act or an act of omission “caused, suffered, allowed or permitted” the release. Causation is not established where the result would have occurred without any action on Alden Leeds’ part. State v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co., 69 N.J. 102, 111, 351 A.2d 337 (1976) (<HOLDING>). The mere storage of the chemicals by Alden Options: A. holding that a commission is a body with special and limited power and it can only exercise the power expressly or impliedly granted to it and any reasonable doubt of existence of any power must be resolved against the exercise thereof B. holding because nuclear power plant was only accelerating condition that would naturally have occurred it was not charged with polluting creek in violation of njsa 23528 C. holding that a condition banning pornography prejudiced the defendant because there was a reasonable probability that the condition would not have been imposed had the district court conducted a sufficiently individualized determination given that the defendants conviction was for a registration offense not a sexual exploitation offense D. holding that the court had no power to sanction conduct that occurred in an arbitration E. holding that agencys construction of statute it was charged with enforcing was entitled to deference because it was reasonable in line with the statutes meaning and related to its expertise

assistant: The best answer is B. holding because nuclear power plant was only accelerating condition that would naturally have occurred it was not charged with polluting creek in violation of njsa 23528
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: During the Employment Term, the Executive agrees to serve the Company, and the Company shall employ the Executive as its Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer; provided , however , that the Executive’s role as Interim Chief Financial Officer shall begin on the earlier to occur of (a) the date on which the Company’s current Chief Financial Officer’s employment with the Company terminates, or (b) November 30, 2015. During the Employment Term, the Executive shall possess such broad powers and perform such duties and functions as are normally incident to the positions of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with an entity of an equivalent size and nature as the Company.

assistant: Positions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: with the statutes. Mother was offered numerous services in her other CHINS cases and in this case until the juvenile court granted the reasonable efforts exception, yet she remains unable to effectively parent. [15] “[T]he ADA was not intended ipso facto to re-write state substantive law.” Id. Moreover, “[e]very child is entitled to a minimum level of care regardless of the special needs or limited abilities of its parents. In the final analysis, the rights of the parents under the Fourteenth Amendment and the ADA must be subordinated to the protected rights of the children.” Id. at 831. Here, the juvenile court determined pursuant to state statute that DCS was not required to provide services to Mother due to her previous history of parental rights’ terminations. See id. at 830 (<HOLDING>). Neither the DCS request nor the juvenile Options: A. holding that the numerous inconsistencies in the testimony of the persons primarily responsible for plaintiffs termination when coupled with the timing of plaintiffs termination and the conflicting reasons given by defendants agents for the termination might well persuade a jury that defendant fired the plaintiff in retaliation for the letter sent by her attorney to defendants general counsel B. holding that a termination of benefits must go handinhand with a termination of the liability of an employer C. holding there were no grounds for challenging in a termination proceeding the alleged failure to comply with the ada in the provision of services because services are not required by the termination statute D. holding that an attorneys services were personal services rendered or labor done under the predecessor statute to section 38001 E. holding that although a reason was provided in the termination letter the without cause termination provision was applicable

assistant: The best answer is C. holding there were no grounds for challenging in a termination proceeding the alleged failure to comply with the ada in the provision of services because services are not required by the termination statute
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: EACH CREDIT PARTY KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY AND ALL RIGHTS SUCH CREDIT PARTY MAY HAVE TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING BASED ON, ARISING OUT OF, OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO: THIS AGREEMENT; THE OBLIGATIONS; ANY NOTES, LOAN AGREEMENTS, OR ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS OR AGREEMENT EXECUTED OR CONTEMPLATED TO BE EXECUTED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OF THE OBLIGATIONS OR ANY OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY. THIS JURY WAIVER ALSO APPLIES TO ANY CLAIM OR, COUNTERCLAIM, CAUSE OF ACTION OR DEMAND ARISING FROM OR RELATED TO (I) ANY COURSE OF CONDUCT, COURSE OF DEALING, OR RELATIONSHIP OF ANY CREDIT PARTY, ANY OBLIGOR, OR ANY OTHER PERSON WITH LENDER OR ANY EMPLOYEE, OFFICER, DIRECTOR OR ASSIGNEE OF LENDER IN CONNECTION WITH THE OBLIGATIONS WITH LENDER; OR (II) ANY STATEMENT (WHETHER VERBAL OR WRITTEN) OR ACTIONS OF ANY PERSON BY OR ON BEHALF OF LENDER TO ANY CREDIT PARTY, ANY OBLIGOR, OR ANY OTHER PERSON IN CONNECTION WITH THE OBLIGATIONS OR LENDER REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH CAUSE OF ACTION ARISES BY CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE. EACH CREDIT PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THIS WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL IS A MATERIAL INDUCEMENT TO THE LENDER IN EXTENDING CREDIT TO BORROWER, THAT THE LENDER WOULD NOT HAVE EXTENDED SUCH CREDIT WITHOUT THIS JURY TRIAL WAIVER, AND THAT EACH CREDIT PARTY HAS BEEN REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY OR HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY IN CONNECTION WITH THIS JURY TRIAL WAIVER AND UNDERSTANDS THE LEGAL EFFECT OF THIS WAIVER. EACH CREDIT PARTY FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT NO PERSON HAS REPRESENTED TO IT, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT LENDER OR ANY OTHER PERSON WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF A LEGAL PROCEEDING, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Following Executive’s employment with the Company, Executive agrees not to defame, disparage or criticize the Company, its business plan, procedures, products, services, development, finances, financial condition, capabilities or other aspect of its business, or any of its officers, directors, agents, assigns, subsidiaries, parent, or other affiliates (and their respective direct and indirect shareholders, members and partners, and directors and officers) in any medium (whether oral, written, electronic or otherwise, whether currently existing or hereafter created), to any person or entity, without limitation in time. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, Executive may confer in confidence with Executive’s advisors and make truthful statements as required by law or to the Board.

assistant: Non-Disparagement
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement is intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement and intended to be a complete and exclusive statement of the agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein. There are no restrictions, promises, representations, warranties or undertakings with respect to the subject matter contained herein, other than those set forth or referred to herein. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements and understandings among the parties with respect to such subject matter.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Note and the Security Agreement is a valid, legal and binding obligation of the Borrower, enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally and by general equitable principles (whether enforcement is sought by proceedings in equity or at law).

assistant: Enforceability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: after six years was constitutional. Lamb refrained from deciding however, “whether the legislature could constitutionally abolish all tort claims against builders and designers arising out of improvements they built or designed.” Id. at 443-444, 302 S.E.2d 868. In that case, the court found this was not an issue as “93% of all claims against architects are brought within six years of the substantial completion of the construction.” Id. at 444 n. 7, 302 S.E.2d 868. Similarly, Tetterton v. Long Mfg. Co., Inc., found § l-50(6)’s statute of repose constitutional in part because “over 97 percent of product-related accidents occur within six years of the time the product was purchased.” 314 N.C. 44, 54, 332 S.E.2d 67 (1985). Here, the plaintiff is cla 0, 861 P.2d 625, 30 A.L.R.5th 729 (1993) (<HOLDING>); Berry By and Through Berry v. Beech Aircraft Options: A. holding first that injuries sustained during contact sports were foreseeable then deciding that public policy insulated the defendant from liability for those injuries B. holding that the appropriate state statute of limitations to borrow for section 1983 actions is that for recovery of damages for personal injuries C. holding that an action for breach of implied warranty of merchantability under the uniform commercial code is a product liability action within the meaning of the products liability act if as here the action is for injury to person or property resulting from a sale of a product D. holding that the united states is immune from monetary damages for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service E. holding that statute barring products liability actions for injuries occurring more than 12 years after product is first sold violated state constitutional prohibition against abrogation of right of action to recover damages for injuries

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that statute barring products liability actions for injuries occurring more than 12 years after product is first sold violated state constitutional prohibition against abrogation of right of action to recover damages for injuries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: trial. During his direct examination by the government, McFarlane testified about his extensive drug dealings and his affiliation with the Jamaican Waterhouse Posse. During cross-examination, McFarlane admitted to selling 400 to 500 kilograms of cocaine. McFarlane and the government believe that McFarlane’s Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination was violated when tates v. Monia, 317 U.S. 424, 427, 63 S.Ct. 409, 87 L.Ed. 376 (1943), and the [Supreme] Court has insisted that the ‘constitutional guarantee is only that the witness not be compelled to give self-incriminating testimony.’ United States v. Washington, 431 U.S. 181, 188, 97 S.Ct. 1814, 52 L.Ed.2d 238 (1977).” McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24, 122 S.Ct. 2017, 2026, 153 L.Ed.2d 47 (2002) (plurality opinion) (<HOLDING>). The Fifth Amendment privilege against Options: A. holding that policy requiring strip searches of prisoners prior to transfer did not violate fourth amendment B. holding that routine monitoring and recording of the calls of convicted prisoners does not violate the prisoners fourth amendment rights C. holding that prison did not violate prisoners fifth amendment rights when it changed the prisoners privilege status level and moved him to a maximumsecurity facility when he refused to participate in a sexual abuse treatment program during which he would have been required to admit all prior improper sexual activities without any guaranty of immunity D. holding defendants prior conviction for assault related to sexual abuse of a minor even though it did not require an act of sexual abuse because it required intent to commit sexual abuse and such a mens rea demonstrate the offense was one relating to sexual abuse E. holding that a prison official can violate a prisoners eighth amendment rights by failing to intervene

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that prison did not violate prisoners fifth amendment rights when it changed the prisoners privilege status level and moved him to a maximumsecurity facility when he refused to participate in a sexual abuse treatment program during which he would have been required to admit all prior improper sexual activities without any guaranty of immunity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: case cited by the State, United States v. $242,484.00, 389 F.3d 1149, 1160 (11th Cir.2004), in support of this argument is distinguishable on its face because it dealt with approximately eight times the amount of money Enriquez was carrying, weighing more than 40 pounds. 19 . This factor, which is related to probable cause, is not strictly necessary to our analysis. However, we include it in our analysis because a connection between the money and criminal activity is relevant in determining whether the State established the money was contraband. 20 . See $8,300.00 in U.S. Currency v. State, No. 05-11-00901-CV, 2012 WL 5359229, at *1 (Tex.App.—Dallas Nov. 1, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.) (noting officers found marijuana in car where money was discovered); $43,774.00, 266 S.W.3d at 187-88 (<HOLDING>); Antrim v. State, 868 S.W.2d 809, 814 Options: A. holding that a complaint met the pleading requirements when it alleged that 36110 was found packaged an unusual manner the money was hidden in a traptype compartment in a van and there was a positive drug dog alert B. holding evidence was insufficient to establish preponderance of evidence of appellants ability to control drugs where drugs found in compartment on back of passenger seat and appellant was sole backseat passenger C. holding that gun found in unreachable secret compartment in vehicle was carried D. recognizing that permissive search of car compartment incident to arrest is based on the fact that compartment is within reach of the arrestee E. holding evidence of a secret compartment in car plus canine alert on compartment supported forfeiture but urging supreme court to require more than a canine alert to establish a connection between money and illegal drugs

assistant: The best answer is E. holding evidence of a secret compartment in car plus canine alert on compartment supported forfeiture but urging supreme court to require more than a canine alert to establish a connection between money and illegal drugs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto on separate counterparts and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Agreement. Receipt by facsimile machine or in “.pdf” format through electronic mail of any executed signature page to this Agreement shall constitute effective delivery of such signature page and shall be treated in all manner and respects and for all purposes as an original agreement and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: factor in calculating the final price agreed upon between the parties, this does not equate to evidence that the sale of the house was a negotiated agreement for a sale based on a per square foot unit. The evidence of the agents was undisputed that they were never aware that Matheus was attempting to negotiate a sale on a per square foot basis. And Ma-theus has pointed to no evidence that the final negotiated price was agreed upon per square foot, that is, per “unit” as compared with a sale in “gross” so as to entitle him to measure the damages in the manner he seeks. We overrule Matheus’s first issue and hold that the trial court did not err in granting the motion for judgment because Matheus’s proposed measure of damages was n -San Antonio 1996, writ denied) (op. on reh’g) (<HOLDING>). The price agreed oh by the parties is Options: A. holding that where plaintiff sought recovery of fees against multiple defendants evidence of unsegregated fees was more than a scintilla of evidence to support fee award what a reasonable attorneys fee would be for the entire case indicates what the segregated amount should be B. holding that there was no evidence of market value where owners testimony affirmatively showed that it was based on personal value C. holding parties negotiated price of vehicle was evidence of market value as represented D. holding determination of property value in case to decide if assessed value was excessive is not a liquidated demand where only evidence of property value was the conclusory allegation of value in plaintiffs unsworn petition E. holding evidence of amount paid for property thought to include mineral rights was more than a scintilla to support market value of land as represented

assistant: The best answer is E. holding evidence of amount paid for property thought to include mineral rights was more than a scintilla to support market value of land as represented
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If a Participant dies after the end of Program Period but prior to the payout date, the Participant shall remain eligible for (but not entitled to) a payout, and any payout if made will be made to the Participant’s estate as provided in Section 4.5 of the Plan.

assistant: Death
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: we reserve the right to disallow , cancel , remove , or reassign certain usernames and permalinks in appropriate circumstances , as determined by us in our sole discretion , and may , with or without prior notice , suspend or terminate your account if activities occur on your account which , in our sole discretion , would or might constitute a violation of this eula , cause damage to or impair the service , infringe or violate any third party rights , or violate any applicable laws or regulations .

assistant: Content removal, Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The purposes of the Company shall be to own, operate and manage the Plant Assets and the Grain Facilities and (b) engage in any other lawful act or activity for which limited liability companies may be organized under the Act. The Company shall possess and may exercise all such powers and privileges granted by the Act, by any other Law or by this Agreement, and any powers incidental thereto as are necessary or convenient to the conduct, promotion or attainment of the foregoing purposes of the Company.

assistant: Powers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties represent and warrant to each other that each of them, respectively, has full power, right and authority to execute and perform this Amendment and all corporate action necessary to do so has been duly taken. In order to induce Lessor to enter into this Amendment, Tenant hereby represents and warrants to Lessor that Tenant’s entry into this Amendment does not require that any consent or approval first be obtained from any lender of Tenant or its Affiliates.

assistant: Authority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Supplement may be modified or amended from time to time in accordance with the terms of the Base Indenture; provided , however , that if, pursuant to the terms of the Base Indenture or this Supplement, the consent of the Required Noteholders is required for an amendment or modification of this Supplement or any other Related Document, such requirement shall be satisfied if such amendment or modification is consented to by the Requisite Series 2019-2 Noteholders; provided , further , that, so long as (i) no Amortization Event has occurred and is continuing and (ii) the Rating Agency Consent Condition is met with respect to the outstanding Series 2019-2 Notes, ABRCF shall be able to (x) increase the Series 2019-2 Maximum Hyundai Amount up to an amount not to exceed 30% of the aggregate Net Book Value of all Vehicles leased under the Leases and/or (y) increase the Series 2019-2 Maximum Kia Amount up to an amount not to exceed 15% of the aggregate Net Book Value of all Vehicles leased under the Leases at any time without the consent of the Series 2019-2 Noteholders by giving written notice of such increase to the Trustee along with an Officer’s Certificate certifying that no Amortization Event has occurred and is continuing; provided , further , that, notwithstanding anything in this Section 5.7 or Article 8 or Article 12 of the Base Indenture to the contrary, this Supplement and any Related Documents relating solely to the Series 2019-2 Notes may be amended to provide for the issuance of any Class D Notes or Additional Class R Notes in accordance with Section 5.15 without the consent of any Class A Noteholder, any Class B Noteholder, any Class C Noteholder or any Class R Noteholder.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If any provision of this Agreement is determined by any court or arbitrator of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such provision will be enforced to the maximum extent possible given the intent of the parties hereto. If such provision cannot be so enforced, such provision shall be stricken from this Agreement and the remainder of this Agreement shall be enforced as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had (to the extent not enforceable) never been contained in this Agreement.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Security Agreement, together with the Notes Documents, embody the entire agreement and understanding between the Grantors and the Notes Collateral Agent relating to the Collateral and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings among the Grantors and the Notes Collateral Agent relating to the Collateral.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Obligor (for itself and its Subsidiaries and Affiliates and the successors, assigns, heirs and representatives of each of the foregoing) (collectively, the “ Releasors ”) does hereby fully, finally, unconditionally and irrevocably release, waive and forever discharge each of the Supporting Holders, together with each of their respective Affiliates, and each of the directors, officers, members, employees, agents, attorneys, financial advisors and consultants of each of the foregoing (each a “ Released Party ”, and collectively, the “ Released Parties ”), from any and all debts, claims, allegations, obligations, damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, suits, demands, liabilities, actions, proceedings and causes of action, in each case, whether known or unknown, contingent or fixed, direct or indirect, and of whatever nature or description, and whether in law or in equity, under contract, tort, statute or otherwise, which any Releasor has heretofore had or now or hereafter can, shall or may have against any Released Party by reason of any act, omission or thing whatsoever done or omitted to be done, in each case, on or prior to the date hereof directly arising out of, connected with or related to this Agreement, the Indenture or any other Notes Document, or any act, event or transaction related or attendant thereto, or the agreements of any Supporting Holder contained therein, or the possession, use, operation or control of any of the assets of any Obligor. Each Obligor represents and warrants that it has no knowledge of any claim by any Releasor against any Released Party or of any facts or acts or omissions of any Released Party which on the date hereof would be the basis of a claim by any Releasor against any Released Party which would not be released hereby.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Seller represents and Certificates that all action on the part of Seller necessary for the authorization, execution, delivery, and performance of all the obligations of Seller under this Agreement has been taken prior to the Closing Date and that this Agreement constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of Seller enforceable in accordance with its terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, and moratorium laws and other laws of general application affecting enforcement of creditor’s rights generally and to general equitable principles. Seller may also sell all securities and execute a promissory note as contemplated by tins Agreement.

assistant: Authorizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company or any parent or subsidiary of the Company is authorized to withhold from any Award granted, any payment relating to an Award under the Plan, including from a distribution of Stock, or any other payment to a Participant, amounts of withholding and other taxes due in connection with any transaction involving an Award, and to take such other action as the Board may deem advisable to enable the Company and Participants to satisfy obligations for the payment of withholding taxes and other tax obligations relating to any Award. This authority shall include authority to withhold or receive Stock or other property and to make cash payments in respect thereof in satisfaction of a Participant’s tax obligations. The Board may provide in the Award Agreement that in the event that a Participant is required to pay any amount to be withheld in connection with the issuance of shares of Stock in settlement or exercise of an Award, the Participant may satisfy such obligation (in whole or in part) by electing to have the Company withhold a portion of the shares of Stock to be received upon settlement or exercise of such Award that is equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement will be construed, performed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without giving effect to its principles or rules of conflict of laws thereof to the extent such principles or rules would require or permit the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing. Without limiting the foregoing, no Default would result from the consummation of the Transactions. As of the Closing Date, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is in default under or with respect to any Contractual Obligation in any respect that, individually or together with all such defaults, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: No Defaults
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Kay’s authorization and knowledge. However, the Damalls were still entitled, under these findings, to enforce the note according to its “original tenor.” Id. The “original tenor” of the note at issue, considering the trial court’s findings, was one with no interest rates stated, only blank spaces. The 18-percent default rate becomes ineffective for any purpose. Accordingly, the trial court’s factual findings render the usury defense based on that 18-percent interest rate inapplicable as a matter of law. The trial court erred in applying usury to defeat the Damalls’ claim for interest. Because of this, we need not address the parties’ arguments on whether the 18-percent interest was usurious under the circumstances of this case. See Kelly v. Kelly, 246 Neb. 55, 516 N.W.2d 612 (1994) (<HOLDING>). The remaining issues are whether any interest Options: A. holding an appellate court need not address remaining issues when disposition of prior issue is dispositive B. holding that an appellate court need not address all remaining issues when disposition of prior issue is dispositive C. holding appellate court need not address issues unnecessary to its decision D. holding an appellate court need not address remaining issues when disposition of a prior issue is dispositive E. holding an appellate court need not address remaining issues on appeal when its determination of a prior issue is dispositive

assistant: The best answer is C. holding appellate court need not address issues unnecessary to its decision
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither the Company’s ownership of the assets, nor, to such Assignor’s knowledge, the operation of the Company’s assets is in violation of any applicable laws, licenses and permits, including any applicable environmental laws, licenses and permits, in any material respect.

assistant: Compliance With Laws