flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: we will send you information relating to your account ( e.g. payment authorizations , invoices , changes in password or payment method , confirmation messages , notices ) in electronic form only , for example via emails to your email address provided during registration .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Without regard to the reason for, or the timing of, Executive’s termination of employment: (i) the Company shall pay the Executive any unpaid base salary earned for periods prior to the effective date of Executive’s termination of employment (the “Termination Date”); (ii) the Company shall pay Executive all of Executive’s accrued and unused vacation through the Termination Date; and (iii) following submission of proper expense reports by Executive, the Company shall reimburse Executive for all expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred by the Executive in connection with the business of the Company prior to the Termination Date. These payments shall be made promptly following termination and within the period of time mandated by law.

assistant: Vacations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: court to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant for a claim arising directly from the telephone call. Id. at 522. Although seemingly applicable at first blush, this case is inapposite. The Norton Court relied heavily on Edmundson v. Miley Trailer Co., where the Iowa Supreme Court recognized “a national tendency which generally has required less and less contact for the constitutional minimum.” See id. at 521-22; Edmundson v. Miley Trailer Co., 211 N.W.2d 269, 272 (Iowa 1973). In Edmundson, the Court held that it was “reasonable” for the non-resident manufacturer and retailer of a trailer and hitch to be subject to a lawsuit anywhere the trailer and hitch traveled. Edmundson, 211 N.W.2d at 272. Edmundson has been overruled. See Smalley v. Dewberry, 379 N.W.2d 922, 924-25 (Iowa 1986) (<HOLDING>). Thus, although Norton has not been directly Options: A. recognizing that worldwide volkswagen is a rejection of edmundson so edmundson must be and is overruled B. recognizing that a 11 evidence must be relevant to be admissible C. holding that while stare decisis is a guiding principle prior interpretations of workers compensation statute must be overruled because the interpretations were wrong D. recognizing that cases holding that proof of venue is jurisdictional are inconsistent with ex parte seymour and have therefore been overruled E. recognizing that a partial new trial may be granted if the issue of damages is so distinct and independent that it can be separately tried

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing that worldwide volkswagen is a rejection of edmundson so edmundson must be and is overruled
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) Owner has, or will have prior to the Closing Date, provided to the Corporation financial statements pertaining to the Assets and the Business for the last three (3) fiscal years ended immediately prior to the date of this Agreement that are an accurate portrayal of the operations of the Assets and the Business (the “Financial Statements”).

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: evernote may from time to time include as part of the service and evernote software computer software supplied by third parties which is utilized by permission of the respective licensors and/or copyright holders on the terms provided by such parties .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: amount and terms of the deductions ...” In case of any failure to pay wages due to an employee as required by Section 41-10-40 or 41-10-50 the employee may recover in a civil action an amount equal to three times the full amount of the unpaid wages, plus costs and reasonable attorney’s fees as the court may allow. § 41-10-80(C). The South Carolina Supreme Court has interpreted this treble damages provision to mean that the decision to award the penalty of treble damages is discretionary, and the penalty should not be imposed “if there is a good faith dispute over wages allegedly due.” Rice, 456 S.E.2d at 383. Fruehauf asks us to extend the requirement that there be a bona fide, good faith wage dispute to require that Wall show that Fruehauf willf 335 S.C. 598, 518 S.E.2d 591 (1999) (<HOLDING>); O’Neal v. Intermedical Hospital of South Options: A. recognizing that an attorney has a duty of loyalty to his client B. holding that the lack of a confidentiality agreement does not necessarily defeat an argument that information is a trade secret because where an employee acquires during the course of his employment a special technique or process developed by his employer he is under a duty not to use it to the detriment of his employer C. holding that an attorney who breaches a fiduciary duty to a client forfeits his right to compensation without any requirement that the client prove actual harm D. holding that an employee who breaches the duty of loyalty to his employer forfeits his right to compensation and creates a good faith dispute over the payment of his wages by virtue of his bad behavior E. holding that when an employee is injured by his employers tortious conduct his employer owes him damages and compensation under the act

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that an employee who breaches the duty of loyalty to his employer forfeits his right to compensation and creates a good faith dispute over the payment of his wages by virtue of his bad behavior
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: car in which contraband is found is insufficient to' support a conviction. In Miller, the defendant was arrested based on an informant’s tip at a time when he was walking toward a car with keys in his hand. Id. at 236-37. Here, Wiley was not merely in possession of car keys. He was apprehended in an area known for narcotics activity, on suspicion of tampering with evidence, with a wad of cash and car keys in his pocket, half a block away from his car in which officers found cocaine, crack cocaine, and paperwork bearing Wiley’s name in plain view. The other authorities upon which Wiley relies are similarly distinguishable because in each case the links between the defendant and the contraband were significantly weaker. See, e.g., Waldon v. State, 579 S.W.2d 499, 502 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) (<HOLDING>); Roberson v. State, 80 S.W.3d 730, 734-36 Options: A. holding evidence that marijuana was found in jointly occupied vehicle in open view was insufficient to establish defendants dominion and control by preponderance of evidence B. holding that the state failed to prove that a hotel visitor had control over marijuana found in plain view in a hotel room because the state did not provide any evidence other than the defendants mere proximity to the marijuana C. holding evidence insufficient to connect defendant to marijuana found in camper near private airplane hangar when he was found in hangar in possession of key to airplane but no evidence indicated he flew airplane that night or in any other way linked him to marijuana found in other vehicle D. holding that officers had objective probable cause to search the pocket of a jacket found on the seat of the defendants truck where the discovery of marijuana in two different locations in the truck combined with the defendants possession of marijuana reasonably led officers to believe that other caches would be found elsewhere in the vehicle E. holding evidence insufficient for conviction of possession of marijuana amphetamines and barbiturates when those drugs were not found on the person of or in the same room as the defendant but were only found on other people on the premises

assistant: The best answer is C. holding evidence insufficient to connect defendant to marijuana found in camper near private airplane hangar when he was found in hangar in possession of key to airplane but no evidence indicated he flew airplane that night or in any other way linked him to marijuana found in other vehicle
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Court is not in a position to determine the exact amount and the time of receipt of any commission that will be owed to the Trustee under the Plan. In other words, at this point the Court is unable to assess the adequacy of the Trustee’s compensation. Noting that the Debtors have stated that they are unopposed to the Court ordering reasonable administrative payments to the Trustee, the Court hereby elects to employ the broad statutory grant of authority given to it under 11 U.S.C. § 105. At the point the Trustee determines that his compensation is inadequate and/or untimely, he may request additional compensation by filing an appropriate application with the Court. See, e.g., Stahn v. Haeckel, 920 F.2d 555 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2258, 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991) (<HOLDING>). The Court thereupon, after notice and an Options: A. holding a bankruptcy court is empowered to reopen a bankruptcy case on its own motion under 11 usc 105a B. holding that bankruptcy court has discretionary power pursuant to 11 usc 105a to order preconfirmation plan payments in a chapter 12 proceeding C. holding that a court had the power pursuant to 105a to compel a defendant to deliver her property which was the subject of a bankruptcy proceeding from outside the courts territorial jurisdiction D. holding that a motion to enforce bankruptcy sale order is a core proceeding and citing 11 usc 105a as the section which gives the bankruptcy court the power and the jurisdiction to enforce its valid orders E. holding that a confirmed chapter 13 plan is binding on all parties under 11 usc 1327a however the plan may be modified pursuant to 11 usc 1329

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that bankruptcy court has discretionary power pursuant to 11 usc 105a to order preconfirmation plan payments in a chapter 12 proceeding
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: subject to the foregoing , niantic and its licensors ( including tpc and tpci ) exclusively own all right , title , and interest in and to the services and content , including all associated intellectual property rights .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In consideration of the transfer of the Purchased Assets conveyed to the Purchaser pursuant to Section 2.1 on the Closing Date, the Purchaser shall pay in cash to FTH LLC on such date an amount equal to the estimated fair market value of the Purchased Assets on the Closing Date. Such purchase price shall be paid in cash to FTH LLC in an amount agreed to between FTH LLC and the Purchaser, and, to the extent not paid in cash by the Purchaser, shall be paid by a capital contribution by FTH LLC in an undivided interest in such Purchased Assets that increases its equity interest in the Purchaser in an amount equal to the excess of the estimated fair market value of the Purchased Assets over the amount of cash paid by the Purchaser to FTH LLC.

assistant: Payments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (2d Cir.2006) (upholding administrator’s determination that plaintiff was not a participating employee under the plan where “ample evidence” suggested that he had been terminated, though there was “also evidence that [he] was not terminated”), and Hobson v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 574 F.3d 75, 89-90 (2d Cir.2009) (rejecting argument that administrator erred in concluding that the claimant was not disabled based on its weighing of competing medical evaluations), with McCauley v. First Unum Life Ins. Co., 551 F.3d 126, 138 (2d Cir.2008) (concluding that administrator’s “reliance on one medical report ... to the detriment of a more detailed contrary report without further investigation was unreasonable”), and Durakovic v. Bldg. Serv. 32 BJ Pension Fund, 609 F.3d 133, 140 (2d Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). Put differently, if the administrator has Options: A. holding that defendant violated section 4b when she misappropriated pool participant funds by soliciting funds for trading and then trading only a small percentage of those funds while disbursing the rest of the funds to investors herself and her family B. holding that a college received federal funds where the funds were granted to its students as financial aid rather than directly to the college because the language of the section does not distinguish between direct and indirect receipt of federal funds C. holding that an order to disgorge funds was final even though the order did not distribute the funds D. holding that funds reasoning was inappropriately onesided where funds summarily dismissed a report by the claimants vocational expert which was vastly more detailed and particularized than the report on which the funds relied E. holding that companys president was trustee of trust funds because he had control and direction over the funds

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that funds reasoning was inappropriately onesided where funds summarily dismissed a report by the claimants vocational expert which was vastly more detailed and particularized than the report on which the funds relied
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise expressly provided in Section 3.01 , all payments to be made by any Loan Party shall be made free and clear of and without condition or deduction for any counterclaim, defense, recoupment or setoff. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all payments by any Loan Party hereunder shall be made to the Administrative Agent, for the account of the respective Lenders to which such payment is owed, at the Administrative Agent s Office in Dollars and in immediately available funds not later than 2:00 p.m. on the date specified herein. The Administrative Agent will promptly distribute to each Lender its Applicable Percentage (or other applicable share as provided herein) in respect of the relevant Facility of such payment in like funds as received by wire transfer to such Lender’s Lending Office. All payments received by the Administrative Agent after 2:00 p.m. shall be deemed received on the next succeeding Business Day and any applicable interest or fee shall continue to accrue. If any payment to be made by any Loan Party shall come due on a day other than a Business Day, payment shall be made on the next following Business Day, and such extension of time shall be reflected in computing interest or fees, as the case may be.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of the Code (730 ILCS 5/5 — 5—3(c)(8) (West 2002)) due to prior convictions. Therefore, as in Wade, his probation sentence was void. Wade, 116 Ill. 2d at 4; see also 366 Ill. App. 3d at 454, 459. A sentence that does not conform to a statutory requirement is void and may be, corrected at any time. People v. Arna, 168 Ill. 2d 107, 113 (1995). A judgment is void where the court orders a lesser sentence than is mandated by statute. Peop sections of the Code, the inescapable conclusion to be drawn from those cases is that a void sentence has no effect on a subsequent valid sentence. Garcia, 179 Ill. 2d at 73 (stating that a subsequent valid sentence “will not be greater than, less than, or equal to [an] original [void] sentence[ ]”). See also People v. Roth, Inc., 412 Ill. 446, 450 (1952) (<HOLDING>). It seems obvious that, under these Options: A. holding that a motion to terminate a consent decree was moot because the challenged provisions of the decree had expired B. holding that a motion to terminate a consent decree was moot because there was no consent decree left to be terminated C. holding that the trial judge had the power to incorporate a settlement agreement in a decree following the entry of a decree of divorce D. holding that an unconstitutional act of congress has no legal effect E. holding that a void decree has no legal effect

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a void decree has no legal effect
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: But a critical difference between that case and the case sub judice is that Ladue banned nearly all residential signs. Governmental action generally will not be invalidated for failing to leave open ample alternative channels of communication unless an entire medium of public expression across a particular community has been foreclosed. See Hill, 530 U.S. at 726, 120 S.Ct. 2480; Metromedia, 453 U.S. at 525-27, 101 S.Ct. 2882 (Brennan, J., concurring). The Supreme Court has been especially hesitant to permit municipalities to completely close off channels of communi cation that provide inexpensive means of disseminating political messages. See, e.g., City of Ladue, 512 U.S. at 54-56, 114 S.Ct. 2038; Martin v. City of Struthers, 319 U.S. 141, 146, 63 S.Ct. 862, 87 L.Ed, 1313 (1943) (<HOLDING>); Lovell v. City of Griffin, 303 U.S. 444, Options: A. holding that a claim under the first amendment overbreadth doctrine will not succeed unless the challenged statute itself will significantly compromise recognized first amendment protections of parties not before the court B. recognizing first amendment retaliation right C. holding a contribution restriction for minors was invalid because the statute was not closely drawn to avoid unnecessary abridgment of first amendment freedoms D. holding invalid under the first amendment a statute banning doortodoor distribution of handbills and circulars E. recognizing first amendment and fourteenth amendment interests in inmate correspondence

assistant: The best answer is D. holding invalid under the first amendment a statute banning doortodoor distribution of handbills and circulars
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Accordingly, the ROA is ambiguous as to the restriction’s purpose in restricting use of the overflow lots to parking. This ambiguity creates a fact issue as to the restriction’s purpose, and the fact issue precludes summary judgment on a “changed conditions” theory in Structure Owners’ favor. Moseley, 486 S.W.3d at 668-69 (ambiguity on purpose of restrictive covenant precluded summary judgment because it was unclear whether restriction against development of truck stop on undeveloped intersection corner was intended to apply only so long as operating truck stop on opposite corner continued to exist or, instead, to apply regardless of whether operating truck stop existed); see TX Far W. Ltd. v. Tex. Invs. Mgmt., Inc., 127 S.W.3d 295, 305-06 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). 3. A fact issue exists regarding degree to Options: A. holding parties to an exculpatory clause where the parties intent is clear B. holding summary judgment was not warranted because material facts were in dispute C. holding that where parties did not respond to an issue in summary judgment motion parties relinquished any claim on the issue and conceded that summary judgment should be entered against them D. holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if there is a genuine dispute about a material fact E. holding that dispute with regard to parties intent prohibits summary judgment

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that dispute with regard to parties intent prohibits summary judgment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Virginia without regard to principles of conflicts of laws. Any action brought by either party against the other concerning the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be brought only in the state courts of New York or in the federal courts located in the state and county of Nassau. The parties to this Agreement hereby irrevocably waive any objection to jurisdiction and venue of any action instituted hereunder and shall not assert any defense based on lack of jurisdiction or venue or based upon forum non conveniens. The Company and Buyer waive trial by jury . The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event that any provision of this Agreement or any other agreement delivered in connection herewith is invalid or unenforceable under any applicable statute or rule of law, then such provision shall be deemed inoperative to the extent that it may conflict therewith and shall be deemed modified to conform with such statute or rule of law. Any such provision which may prove invalid or unenforceable under any law shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of any agreement. Each party hereby irrevocably waives personal service of process and consents to process being served in any suit, action or proceeding in connection with this Agreement, the Note or any related document or agreement by mailing a copy thereof via registered or certified mail or overnight delivery (with evidence of delivery) to such party at the address in effect for notices to it under this Agreement and agrees that such service shall constitute good and sufficient service of process and notice thereof. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to limit in any way any right to serve process in any other manner permitted by law.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Delta Airlines and Gary Richter contend that because Plaintiffs breach of contract claim arises out of events which occurred during the course of embarkation of an international flight, her claim is preempted by the Montreal Convention. Plaintiff responds that her claim falls outside the scope of the Convention because she alleges nonperformance of a contract. Although the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has not addressed this issue, a number of other federal courts have concluded that where the complaint alleges complete nonperformance of a contract, rather than delay in transportation, the Montreal Convention does not preempt a plaintiffs breach of contract claim. See, e.g., Nankin v. Continental Airlines, Inc., No. CV-09-07851, 2010 WL 342632, at *7 (C.D.Cal. Jan. 29, 2010) (<HOLDING>); Mullaney v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., No. Options: A. holding that additional claims brought under state law are preempted by the montreal convention B. holding plaintiffs claims were not preempted by the montreal convention because they were grounded in a cause of action for nonperformance of a contract and not delay C. holding plaintiffs breach of contract claim was not preempted by the montreal convention because plaintiff was seeking damages resulting from deltas refusal to provide him with any flight home after having taken his money for a ticket in short for failure to perform its obligation to provide carriage in exchange for money it had received D. holding that the montreal convention was not applicable to plaintiffs claims because based on plaintiffs allegations it clearly appears that through its employees continental refused to perform the contract E. holding plaintiffs breach of contract claims fell outside the scope of the montreal convention because the plain language of article 19 of the montreal convention indicates that it governs claims for delay not nonperformance

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the montreal convention was not applicable to plaintiffs claims because based on plaintiffs allegations it clearly appears that through its employees continental refused to perform the contract
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: We agree with this assessment. Because a crime of violence necessarily contemplates a victim, we reject Drapeau’s contention that making a bomb is a victimless crime. We now turn to the question of whether the district court clearly erred in its finding that Officer Sazue was a “victim” of making the firebombs. Because the Sentencing Guidelines do not define the term “victim,” we look to the term’s plain and ordinary meaning in interpreting the Guidelines. See Un .2d 390 (1997); United States v. McCaleb, 908 F.2d 176, 179 (7th Cir.1990) (“Nothing in the ... guidelines requires that the victim be harmed or made aware of the threat.”). It is enough that the intended victim of the crime was a government official. Cf. United States v. Duran, 891 F.Supp. 629, 633 (D.D.C.1995) (<HOLDING>). As found by the district court, Drapeau and Options: A. holding that the erroneous admission of a hearsay statement that identified the defendant as the shooter was harmless where the defendant never contested that he shot the gun but claimed only that he shot in selfdefense B. holding that attempted felony murder was abolished C. holding that there is no crime of attempted felony murder in florida D. holding that a 3a12a enhancement was appropriate for attempted murder of the president although the defendant mistakenly shot at a lookalike E. holding that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue based on the first districts decision in montgomery that the standard attempted manslaughterbyact instruction was fundamentally erroneous where betts was charged with attempted firstdegree premeditated murder and convicted of the necessary lesserincluded offense of attempted seconddegree murder

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a 3a12a enhancement was appropriate for attempted murder of the president although the defendant mistakenly shot at a lookalike
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If the Total Credit Exposure of any Lender is increased in accordance with this Section, the Administrative Agent and the Borrowers shall determine the effective date (the “ Increase Effective Date ”) and the final allocation of such increase. The Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the Borrowers and the Lenders of the final allocation of such increase and the Increase Effective Date.

assistant: Effective Dates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive hereby represents and warrants to returning documents and other property of Riverview. Executive further agrees: (i) to cooperate with Riverview to the extent that Executive’s knowledge of facts concerning Riverview’s business is required to respond to any governmental or regulatory inquiry, or in connection with any court, administrative proceeding, or investigation related to matters that took place during the term of Executive’s employment, and (ii) to furnish such information and assistance to Riverview as may reasonably be required by Riverview in connection with any litigation in which it or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates is, or may become, a party.

assistant: Cooperation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement supersedes any and all prior agreements between the parties, oral or written, except with respect to any of Employee’s continuing obligations as set forth above, which shall continue and remain in full force and effect per the terms of those covenants.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 5. Confidential Information shall not include any information that: (d) was developed by Recipient or its Representatives independently of and without reference to Confidential Information. 8. Discloser understands that Recipient is an ice cream manufacturer and engaged in distribution (and with arrangements with distributors or subdistributors) and that planned activities in all such areas that are independently developed, pursued or acquired by the Recipient may contain ideas and concepts similar or identical to those contained in Discloser's Confidential Information. Discloser agrees that entering into this Agreement shall not preclude Recipient from developing, pursuing or acquiring projects similar to Discloser's, without obligation to Discloser, provided Recipient does not breach its obligations to Discloser under this Agreement or use the Confidential Information to develop or pursue such projects.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: France argues that she never encountered any of JSG’s confidential information or trade secrets during the course of her employment and, as a result, could not have disclosed or used such information. France also posits that Apollo’s relationship with Barnes predates her employment with Apollo, and that she has not solicited any of JSG’s existing clients. In Illinois, trade secrets are protected by the Illinois Trade Secrets Act (“ITSA”), 765 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 1065/1-9 (West 2010). See also 765 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 1065/8 (West 2010) (“[T]his act is intended to displace ... other laws of this State providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.”). See also Composite Marine Propellers, Inc. v. Van Der Woude, 962 F.2d 1263, 1265 (7th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). The statute provides injunctive relief for Options: A. recognizing firearms as common tools of the drug trade B. recognizing that illinois has abolished common law theories of trade secret misappropriation C. holding that under illinois law interpreting the meaning of a contract is a question of law determined by the court D. recognizing common law privileges E. recognizing a cause of action under texas law for misappropriation

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that illinois has abolished common law theories of trade secret misappropriation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries owns, or is licensed to use, all Intellectual Property necessary for the conduct of its business as currently conducted except for any such Intellectual Property that if it were not so owned or licensed could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. No material claim has been asserted and is pending by any Person challenging or questioning the use of any Intellectual Property or the validity or effectiveness of any Intellectual Property, nor does the Borrower know of any valid basis for any such claim. The use of Intellectual Property by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries does not infringe on the rights of any Person in any material respect except for such claims and infringements that, in the aggregate, could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company hereby agrees to employ Executive and Executive agrees to serve as the Chief Financial Officer, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein. Executive will report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Subject to the direction and control of the Company, Executive will have all the responsibilities and powers normally associated with such position and Executive will perform such other duties and responsibilities as may be designated from time to time by the Company.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement (a) shall be construed in accordance with the internal laws (but not the laws of conflicts) of the State of Idaho, to the extent not preempted by federal law, (b) may be executed in multiple counterparts (including by facsimile or electronic transmission), all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same original, (c) may not be, nor may any of the rights or obligations of the parties hereto be, assigned by any party except with the prior written consent of the other party hereto, provided that the Company may assign its obligations to a successor that agrees to perform such obligations, (d) represents the complete understanding and agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and (e) may not be amended without the written consent of both you and the Company.

assistant: Miscellaneous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (West 1998); Fla. Stat Ann. § 68.081-092 (West 1998). In any event, the argument that states are relators under § 3730(b)(1) is rather strained. To the extent it relies on the Senate Report author’s knowledge of one suit by a state relator, it is no more persuasive than the analogous argument based on the Report’s “recognition” of pri- or suits against state defendants. The argument, moreover, depends on the proposition that § 3730(b)(5) prevents all parties, except for the United States, from intervening in another relator’s qui tam action. Yet it is not at all clear that this provision precludes all forms of party joinder, which would effectively limit qui tam actions to single relators. See United States ex rel. Precision Co. v. Koch Indus., Inc., 31 F.3d 1015, 1017 (10th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). If states could join as co-plaintiffs with Options: A. holding that pursuant to rule 2a2 a party may appeal an order denying a motion for permissive intervention B. holding that an order denying intervention is final and subject to immediate review if it prevents the applicant from becoming a party to the action and taking jurisdiction under 1291 C. recognizing intervention is generally impermissible after entry of final judgment and exception allowing postjudg ment intervention in the interests of justice is limited to permitting intervention by affected persons so that an appeal can be taken D. holding that adverse inferences are permissive not mandatory E. holding that 3730b5 does not prohibit all forms of joinder but only prevents permissive intervention in a relators suit by unrelated parties under fedrcivp 24b2

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that 3730b5 does not prohibit all forms of joinder but only prevents permissive intervention in a relators suit by unrelated parties under fedrcivp 24b2
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The term of employment under this Agreement shall begin on September 5, 2017 (the “ Effective Date ”) and shall expire on September 1, 2020, unless terminated sooner as provided in this Agreement or unless extended as provided in the next sentence (the “ Employment Period ”). Unless this Agreement is terminated earlier, commencing on September 1, 2020, and on each anniversary of September 1, 2020 (each September 1st on or after September 1, 2020, the “ Renewal Date ”), the Employment Period shall be extended for one additional year (a “ Renewal Term ”), unless either party notifies the other party at least ninety (90) days prior to the applicable Renewal Date that the Employment Period shall not be so extended; provided, however, that in no event shall the Employment Period be extended beyond September 1, 2024.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All payments to be made and benefits to be provided under this Paragraph 2 shall be subject to normal deductions for income and employment tax withholding and other withholding in accordance with the normal payroll practices and schedule of the Company.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The General Partner and each of the Partnership Entities has been duly formed and is validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State or other jurisdiction of its organization and has the requisite power and authority, and has all governmental licenses, authorizations, consents and approvals necessary, to own, lease, use or operate its Properties and carry on its business as now being conducted, except where the failure to obtain such licenses, authorizations, consents and approvals would not be reasonably likely, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Partnership Material Adverse Effect. The General Partner and each of the Partnership Entities is duly qualified or licensed and in good standing as a foreign corporation, limited partnership, limited liability company or unlimited liability company, as applicable, and is authorized to do business in each jurisdiction in which the ownership or leasing of its Properties or the character of its operations makes such qualification necessary, except where the failure to obtain such qualification, license, authorization or good standing would not be reasonably likely, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Partnership Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Existence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if the class action waiver is found to be illegal or unenforceable as to all or some parts of a dispute , then those parts wo n't be arbitrated but will proceed in court , with the rest proceeding in arbitration .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of a counterpart signature page by facsimile transmission or by e-mail transmission of an Adobe portable document format file (also known as a “ PDF ” file) shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart signature page.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (1) Employment in the institution. (2) Iowa state industries. (3) An employment program established by the director. (4) A treatment program established by the director. (5) An inmate educational program approved by the director. Iowa Code § 903A.2 (Supp.1997) (emphasis added). Propp had a category “A” sentence. 3 .The practice of the DOC is to allow an inmate required to participate in a sex offender treatment program to earn credits while awaiting placement in the program rather than being deemed ineligible until completion of the program. This interpretation of the statute is not challenged in this case. 4 . Propp does not claim that requiring him to participate in the SOTP is itself a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. Cf. Schreiber v. State, 666 N.W.2d 127, 130 (Iowa 2003) (<HOLDING>). Nor does he claim he could not be disciplined Options: A. holding that the constitutional prohibition on ex post facto laws applies only to penal statutes which disadvantage the offender affected by them B. holding that revocation of medical license does not violate the ex post facto clause C. holding that work release and security classification regulations were not ex post facto laws D. holding imposition of discipline for refusal to supply blood specimen did not violate ex post facto clause E. holding statute requiring inmates to submit blood specimens for dna profiling did not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws

assistant: The best answer is E. holding statute requiring inmates to submit blood specimens for dna profiling did not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment, along with the Fee Agreement (as amended hereby), shall constitute the full and entire understanding and agreement between the parties with regard to the subjects hereof and thereof, and any and all other written or oral agreements existing between the parties hereto are expressly canceled.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Grant Agreement, together with the Subplan and the 2007 Plan, sets forth the entire agreement between the parties with reference to the subject matter hereof, and there are no agreements, understandings, warranties, or representations, written, express, or implied, between them with respect to the Stock Unit Grant other than as set forth herein or therein, all prior agreements, promises, representations and understandings relative thereto being herein merged.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If all of the Loan has been paid and performed in full and all commitments to extend credit or other credit accommodations under the Loan Agreement have been terminated, the Secured Party shall execute and deliver to the Pledgor a proper instrument or instruments acknowledging the release and termination of the security interests created by this Agreement, and shall duly assign and deliver to the Pledgor (without recourse and without any representation or warranty) any of the Collateral as may be in the possession of Secured Party and has not previously been applied pursuant to this Agreement.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Reporting of and withholding on the Severance for tax purposes shall be at the discretion of the Company Parties in conformance with applicable tax laws and the past practices of the Company Parties. If a claim is made against any of the Company Parties for any additional tax or withholding in connection with or arising out of the Severance, that should have been withheld or that is a tax payable by Hinds, Hinds shall pay any such claim within thirty (30) days of being notified by the Company Parties of the amount owed.

assistant: Payments