flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company will reimburse Executive for reasonable travel, entertainment and other business expenses, including professional association fees, incurred by Executive in the furtherance of the performance of Executive’s duties hereunder. Executive is expected to travel frequently to the Company’s San Francisco, California, Tempe, Arizona and Seattle, Washington offices. All travel will be in accordance with the Company’s travel policy and reimbursements to Executive by the Company pursuant to this Section 5 shall be in accordance with the Company’s expense reimbursement policy as in effect from time to time.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: juror in this case? (Emphasis added.) Smith contends the court’s remark that he was a Native American “had the effect of relieving the government of its burden of proving ... that Smith is an Indian.” We disagree. Given the context of the district court’s statement, the prospective jurors likely understood the court’s remark as part of an inquiry into potential prejudice, not as a comment on forthcoming evidence. Moreover, at the close of trial, the court instructed the jury not to “read into ... anything the court may have said or done any suggestion as to what verdict you should return.” Although this instruction was rather general, it was sufficient to cure any potential mis-impression arising from the court’s comment. See United States v. McGill, 604 F.2d 1252, 1255 (9th Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED. * This disposition is not Options: A. holding almost any improper argument may be cured by an instruction to disregard B. holding that a trial judge is obliged to give a correct jury instruction notwithstanding that request for instruction was technically erroneous if the evidence generates the subject matter of the jury instruction C. holding that in a criminal trial the trial court must correct or amend an improper instruction if the proper instruction is necessary for the jury to understand the case D. holding that instruction to disregard cured error from prosecutors improper comment during voir dire E. holding that a judges comment on the issues in the case although not technically correct could be cured by instruction

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a judges comment on the issues in the case although not technically correct could be cured by instruction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 5 Notably absent from the notice clause are words such as “only” or “must,” or phrases such as “all other methods of notice are insufficient,” which would clearly limit the methods of notice to those listed. 6 “A court will not rewrite the contract of the parties.” 11 Williston, Contracts §31:5 (4th ed.). 7 See Baybank v. George, 3 Mass. L. Rptr. 473 (1995) (stating that notice served in the listed ways would be adequate even if allegedly unreceived). 8 See Cummings Properties, LLC v. Eaton Corp. 13 Mass. L. Rptr. 609 n.2 (2001) (indicating that the language “notice .. . shall be deemed duly served when served by constable, or delivered ... by certified mail...” did not limit the methods of giving notice to those listed); see also Korey v. Sheff, 3 Mass.App.Ct. 266, 267-68 (1975) (<HOLDING>). 9 As the plaintiffs, no doubt, are now well Options: A. holding that language similar to the above did not exclude other methods of notice B. holding that similar language provided a sufficient general jurisdiction allegation C. holding that notice to the attorney of record constitutes notice to the petitioner D. holding similar language to be a valid disclaimer E. holding that notice to supervisor is notice to city

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that language similar to the above did not exclude other methods of notice
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: him. Se'e 342 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. denied). However, Yuen does not hold that a pro se party cannot be sanctioned pursuant to Chapter 10. In Yuen, although Yuen’s name was on the challenged pleadings, the pleadings themselves were actually signed by associates at Yuen’s law firm, not by Yuen himself. Id. at 828. Chapter 10 allows for the imposition of sanctions against “a person [who] has signed a pleading or motion.” Id. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals followed cases construing Rule 13 that limited “sanctions for groundless pleadings to the attorney who actually signed the pleadings and a represented party” and held that because section 10.004 contains substantially similar language to Rule 13, that section “likewi ouston [1st Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). None of the cases cited by Akinwamide Options: A. holding attorney lacked standing to challenge amount of attorney fees awarded plaintiffs not parties to the appeal B. holding that trial court erred in sanctioning attorney under rule 13 when only pleading motion or other paper attorney signed was his notice of appearance which was not challenged as sanctionable by opposing parties C. holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider an award of sanctions entered against attorney because the notice of appeal did not provide that attorney was appealing in his own name D. holding that notice to the attorney of record constitutes notice to the petitioner E. holding that under florida law for the purposes of collateral estoppel an attorney is in privity with his or her client in a previous suit when the opposing party in that action brings a subsequent suit against the attorney based in the same facts

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that trial court erred in sanctioning attorney under rule 13 when only pleading motion or other paper attorney signed was his notice of appearance which was not challenged as sanctionable by opposing parties
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All obligations of the Company and any Subsidiary under the Program shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successor to the Company or such Subsidiary, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, demutualization or otherwise.

assistant: Successors
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be separately executed in counterparts and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to constitute one and the same Amendment. The Amendment Documents may be validly executed by facsimile or other electronic transmission.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: there was a constitutional violation and then whether the right was clearly established at the time of the challenged action. Id. at 487 (citing Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001)). I There is no question that Anderson had a liberty interest in continuing his participation in the temporary release program. See Anderson II, 317 F.3d at 197, 199-200; Friedl v. City of New York, 210 F.3d 79, 84 (2d Cir.2000) (“Prisoners on work release have a liberty interest in continued participation in such programs.”). As the defendants concede, Anderson cannot be deprived of this liberty interest without due process, which includes notice and an opportunity to be heard. See Friedl, 210 F.3d at 84-85; see also Kim v. Hurston, 182 F.3d 113, 118 (2d Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). In Tracy v. Salamack, 572 F.2d 393 (2d Options: A. holding that a prisoner cannot be deprived of a protected liberty interest in goodtime credits without procedural due process B. holding that while participating in a temporary release program inmates who lived at home enjoyed a liberty interest the loss of which imposed a sufficiently serious hardship to require compliance with at least minimal procedural due process C. holding that prisoner had no liberty interest in remaining in voluntary boot camp program despite fact that completion of program qualifies inmate for early release D. recognizing that a parents liberty interest in the custody of a child is subject to due process protection E. recognizing that early release statutes can create a liberty interest protected by due process guarantees

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that while participating in a temporary release program inmates who lived at home enjoyed a liberty interest the loss of which imposed a sufficiently serious hardship to require compliance with at least minimal procedural due process
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: or negligence of independent suppliers of services to the tour Ramage purchased from GET, including providers of transportation services. GET argues because the law is clear that such disclaimers are fully enforceable and that tour operators are not liable for the alleged negligence of independent suppliers of services to tours, GET should be dismissed from the action brought by Ramage. First, GET contends that the terms and conditions of the contract governing the tour, specifically the disclaimer therein, bar Ramage’s claim against defendant. Generally, contractual disclaimers and limitations of liability are binding even though they appear on pre-printed tickets and brochures. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 593, 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1527, 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (<HOLDING>). More specifically, tour operators’ Options: A. holding that a standard form forumselection clause which appeared on plaintiffs passenger ticket was valid as a disclaimer B. holding that the language in the lease agreement for computer accounting programs was an effective disclaimer of an implied warranty but for language in a statement of installation conditions which document created a genuine issue of material fact as to disclaimer C. holding inconspicuous written disclaimer to be unenforceable absent actual knowledge of the disclaimer D. holding that a standard form disclaimer for negligence of thirdparty tour operators which appeared on plaintiffs cruise ticket was valid as a disclaimer E. holding similar language to be a valid disclaimer

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a standard form forumselection clause which appeared on plaintiffs passenger ticket was valid as a disclaimer
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Restricted Stock Units are subject to both a performance-based vesting condition and a time-based vesting condition, both of which must be satisfied, together with the additional vesting conditions in Subsection (a)(iii) below, before the Restricted Stock Units will be considered to be vested on a Vesting Date (as defined in Subsection (a)(iii) below).

assistant: Vesting
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: U.S. at -, 112 S.Ct. at 1870, 119 L.Ed.2d at 42 (stating that Congress' intended to exert "the full measure of its taxing power” by including within the definition of gross income any accession to wealth). 20 . Reese, 24 F.3d at 231. 21 . United States v. Centennial Sav. Bank FSB, 499 U.S. 573, 583, 111 S.Ct. 1512, 1519, 113 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991). 22 . Immigration and Naturalization Serv. v. National Ctr. for Immigrants, 502 U.S. 183, 189-90, 112 S.Ct. 551, 556, 116 L.Ed.2d 546 (1992). 23 . Reese, 24 F.3d at 231 (internal quotations omitted) (citing Black's Law Dictionary 390 (6th ed. 1990)). 24 . Hawkins, 30 F.3d at 1083 (emphasis added) (citing Starrels v. Commissioner, 304 F.2d 574, 576 (9th Cir.1962)); see 1 B. Blitker, Federal Taxation of Income, Estates and Gifts, ¶ 13.1.4 (1981) (<HOLDING>); accord Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., Options: A. holding that it is wellsettled that although a plaintiff is entitled to full recovery for its damages it is not entitled to a double recovery for the same loss or injury B. recognizing that the rationale for 104a2 is presumably that the recovery does not generate a gain or profit but only makes the taxpayer whole by compensating for a loss C. holding that measure of restitution is victims loss not defendants gain D. holding that the avoidance powers provide for recovery only if the recovery is for the benefit of the estate E. holding that because the workers compensation law makes no provision for compensating a surviving dependent for the loss of services the decedent rendered to his family during his lifetime the collateral source rule did not bar recovery by the survivor of pip essential services benefits

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing that the rationale for 104a2 is presumably that the recovery does not generate a gain or profit but only makes the taxpayer whole by compensating for a loss
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: PER CURIAM. Donald Jackman, Jr. appeals the District Court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) for the return of firearms and other property seized during a search of his residence. In February 2002, Jackman was convicted of possession of an unregistered destructive device and pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon. He was subsequently sentenced to 262 months in prison. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal. In a separate proceeding, the government filed for forfeiture of several of Jackman’s firearms, a Cir.2000)(<HOLDING>). Although Jackman focuses primarily on Options: A. holding that a convicted felon is not entitled to return of firearms or to have firearms held in trust by third party B. holding that a convicted felon is not entitled to have firearms returned held in trust or sold for his profit C. holding the defendant was a convicted felon within the purview of the federal statute prohibiting the receiving and possession of firearms by a convicted felon where the defendants prior conviction was based on an idaho state probated sentence D. holding that a convicted felon may sue a municipal government to recover the value of seized firearms that he owned E. holding that dual convictions of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of ammunition by a convicted felon violated double jeopardy

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a convicted felon is not entitled to return of firearms or to have firearms held in trust by third party
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: the amazon services and all information , content , materials , products ( including software ) and other services included on or otherwise made available to you through the amazon services are provided by amazon on an `` as is '' and `` as available '' basis , unless otherwise specified in writing .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: River. The trial court overruled appellee’s exceptions, finding no case holding access to navigable water prevents property from being landlocked. Trial Court Opinion, 5/19/08, at 3. An en banc Commonwealth Court vacated and remanded, finding the Board should have considered evidence regarding river access. In re: Private Road in Speers Boro, II, Washington County, No. 1016 C.D. 2008, unpublished memorandum at 13-14 (Pa.Cmwlth. filed November 20, 2009). The court further noted the Monongahela River has long been considered a public highway and “place of necessary resort,” and other jurisdictions have considered water access in determining whether necessity exists. Id., at 12-13 (citing Balliet v. Commonwealth, 17 Pa. 509, 514 (1851); In re Daniel, 656 N.W.2d 543, 546 (Minn.2003) (<HOLDING>)). Thus, the court concluded, “a proper Options: A. holding lake on private land was not navigable in fact and there was no right of public use and enjoyment as lake was not fed by or part of a navigable stream B. holding access to property by navigable lake was per se bar to finding of necessity C. holding that retention of some access rights does not preclude a per se taking D. holding that denial of access per se is noncompensable E. holding such agreements to be per se illegal

assistant: The best answer is B. holding access to property by navigable lake was per se bar to finding of necessity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be terminated by any Purchaser, as to such Purchaser’s obligations hereunder only and without any effect whatsoever on the obligations between the Company and the other Purchasers, by written notice to the other parties, if the Closing has not been consummated on or before May 31, 2016; provided , however , that no such termination will affect the right of any party to sue for any breach by any other party (or parties).

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If, within twelve months following a Change in Control, (i) the Participant is terminated by the Company or an employing Affiliate (that is not a Joint Venture) without Cause or (ii) the Participant resigns from the Company or an employing Affiliate (that is not a Joint Venture) for Good Reason, the Option shall vest and become exercisable.

assistant: Change In Control
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: THIS AMENDMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES UNDER THIS AMENDMENT AND ANY CLAIM, CONTROVERSY OR DISPUTE ARISING UNDER OR RELATED TO THIS AMENDMENT (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY CLAIMS SOUNDING IN CONTRACT LAW OR TORT LAW ARISING OUT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER HEREOF) SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except for any filings or clearance required under applicable antitrust or competition related Laws and the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State, all consents, approvals, authorizations and orders (corporate, governmental or otherwise) in respect of, or filing with any Governmental Entity required for, or in connection with, the valid and lawful authorization, execution and delivery and performance by the Purchaser and Merger Sub of this Agreement and the consummation by the Purchaser and Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby have been obtained, including, in the case of the Merger, the approval of the Purchaser as the sole stockholder of Merger Sub.

assistant: Approvals
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: between defendants. See United States v. Monsanto, 858 F.2d 160, 171-72 (C.A.4 1988). See also Faison v. Nationwide Mortg. Corp., 839 F.2d 680, 686 (C.A.D.C.1988). A bankruptcy trustee “may recover only once from multiple transferees in multilateral fraudulent conveyances,” but cannot recover the full amount from each defendant to receive duplicate recovery. HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank, 48 F.3d 623, 640 (C.A.2 1995) (citing Robert J. White, Leveraged Buyouts & Fraudulent Conveyance Law Under the Bankruptcy Code, 1991 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 357, 410-11 (1992)). Because there are multiple defendants, “any amount paid by anybody ... for and on account of any injury or damage, should be held for a credit on the total recovery in any action for the same injury or damages” to preven (C.A.4 2006) (<HOLDING>). The compensatory damages award sought is Options: A. holding that because there was no distinction between the damages caused by actions of defendants in a prior case and actions of the defendant in this case the plaintiff suffered a single indivisible injury allowing for one cause of action B. holding that the rule of splitting of causes of action as related to res judicata does not permit the owner of a single or entire cause of action or an entire indivisible demand to divide or split that cause of action and that all damages from a single wrongful act must be claimed in one action C. recognizing this distinction D. holding that a defendant supervisory official cannot be liable for an underlings actions unless there is proof that the defendant is personally responsible for the alleged unconstitutional actions that caused his injury E. holding that if state law provides multiple statutes of limitations for personal injury actions the general or residual statute for personal injury actions should be used for 1983 actions

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that because there was no distinction between the damages caused by actions of defendants in a prior case and actions of the defendant in this case the plaintiff suffered a single indivisible injury allowing for one cause of action
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall terminate upon the payment in full in cash of the Obligations (other than Unasserted Contingent Obligations); provided , however , this Agreement shall be reinstated if at any time any payment of any of the Obligations is rescinded or must otherwise be returned by any holder of the Obligations or any representative of such holder and the Obligations, or portion thereof, intended to have been satisfied shall be deemed to be reinstated and outstanding as if such payment had not occurred. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, the provisions of Sections 2.9 , 10.1 , 10.12 and this 10.17 shall survive any such termination and payment in full of the Obligations, and shall inure to the benefit of any Person that at any time held a right thereunder (as a Holder, an Indemnitee or otherwise) and, thereafter, its successors and permitted assigns.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: David K. Lewis, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his due process rights were violated in connection with the confiscation of a television set. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hawkins v. Risley, 984 F.2d 321, 323 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam). We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment based on the doctrine of issue preclusion because Lewis’s due process claims were previously litigated and decided on the merits in a state habeas proceeding. See In re Lewis, 03W0051B, slip op. at 1-2 (Cal.Super.Ct. March 12, 2004); Silverton v. Dep’t of Treasury, 644 F.2d 1341, 1347 (9th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>). The district court did not abuse its Options: A. holding issue preclusion bars section 1983 plaintiff from relitigating fourth amendment issue decided in state court criminal proceeding B. holding that aedpa limits a federal habeas court to the record before the state court where a claim has been adjudicated on the merits by the state court C. holding that a habeas claim is procedurally barred where it was already raised on direct appeal and decided on the merits by this court D. holding that the federal habeas corpus court could reach the merits of a due process claim even though there was no contemporaneous objection in state court trial where the state habeas corpus court reached the merits rather than rely on the procedural default defense E. holding that a state habeas proceeding decided on the merits precluded a section 1983 action in federal court

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a state habeas proceeding decided on the merits precluded a section 1983 action in federal court
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: EACH GRANTOR IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO, AND AGREES NOT TO REQUEST, A JURY TRIAL FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF ANY DISPUTE HEREUNDER OR UNDER ANY OTHER TRANSACTION DOCUMENT OR IN CONNECTION WITH OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, ANY OTHER TRANSACTION DOCUMENT OR ANY TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Credit Party shall pay all Taxes imposed upon it or any of its properties or assets or in respect of any of its income, businesses or franchises before any penalty or fine accrues thereon, and all claims (including claims for labor, services, materials and supplies) for sums that have become due and payable and that by Law have or may become a Lien upon any of its properties or assets, prior to the time when any penalty or fine shall be incurred with respect thereto, except where the failure to do so would not reasonably be expected to result in material liabilities to a Credit Party ; provided , (a) no such Tax or claim need be paid if it is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings promptly instituted and diligently conducted, so long as adequate reserve or other appropriate provision, as shall be required in conformity with GAAP shall have been made therefor, and (b) in the case of a Tax or claim which has or may become a Lien against any of the Collateral, such contest proceedings conclusively operate to stay the sale of any portion of the Collateral to satisfy such Tax or claim. No Credit Party will file or consent to the filing of any consolidated income tax return, except for any such return of a group of which a Credit Party, Parent Guarantor, a Subsidiary of Parent Guarantor or any Person that directly or indirectly owns Equity Interests in the Borrower as a result of a Permitted Equity Transaction is the common parent.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the rights, licenses and obligations hereunder may not be assigned, by operation of Law or otherwise, by any Party without the express prior written consent of the other Parties, except as provided in Section 9.08 . Any assignment or transfer in violation of this Section 9.07 shall be null and void. This Agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective permitted successors and assigns.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive shall be entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable and appropriate travel, entertainment, and other expenses incurred by Executive while employed (in accordance with the policies and procedures established by the Company for its executive officers) in the performance of his duties and responsibilities under this Agreement; provided that Executive properly accounts for such expenses in accordance with Company policies and procedures. The Executive shall be responsible for any unreasonable or inappropriate expenses incurred in violation of Company policies and procedures.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: address the argument that the Plaintiffs have not obtained the necessary specific use permit to operate as a “dance hall or nightclub.” In the event that the Plaintiffs should choose to operate as a "dance hall or nightclub” and this indeed violates a valid City Ordinance, then the City may take appropriate action. 6 . This was the only reason stated for the revocation. All of the other justifications offered by the City were produced after the complaint was filed. 7 . Even though the Court looks to the Ordinance in reaching its conclusion that the BCCC does not contain a church, it is notable that other cases have held that religious worship does not automatically create a church for zoning purposes. See Coe v. City of Dallas, 266 S.W.2d 181, 183 (Tex.Civ.App.—El Paso 1953, no writ) (<HOLDING>); See Also Heard v. City of Dallas, 456 S.W.2d Options: A. holding that the sale of 440 square feet of a city park containing a ten commandments monument to a private organization was valid because there were no unusual circumstances B. holding that buie permitted the search of a bedroom fifteen feet down a hallway in which the suspect was arrested C. holding that electioneering approximately fifty feet from entrance to building did not violate the milchem rule where those waiting in line to vote were inside the building while the polls were open D. holding that a municipal corporation was forbidden to construct an auditorium in a park as such construction would practically destroy the lot as a park and convert its use into a public square E. holding that a proposed building that was to devote 2400 square feet to healing and prayer rooms but only 600 square feet to a church proper was not a church

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a proposed building that was to devote 2400 square feet to healing and prayer rooms but only 600 square feet to a church proper was not a church
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All of the covenants or other agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive until fully performed or fulfilled, unless and to the extent that non‑compliance with such covenants or agreements is waived in writing by the party entitled to such performance. Except for the warranties and representations contained in Sections 3.01 , 3.02(a ), 3.03(a ), 3.12 , 3.13 , 3.14 and 3.16 and the representations and warranties contained in Article IV , which shall survive until the sixth (6th) anniversary of the Initial Closing Date, the representations and warranties made herein shall survive for twelve (12) months following the Initial Closing Date and shall then expire; provided that nothing herein shall relieve any party of liability for any inaccuracy or breach of such representation or warranty to the extent that any good faith allegation of such inaccuracy or breach is made in writing prior to such expiration by a Person entitled to make such claim pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, claims may be made with respect to the breach of any representation, warranty or covenant until the applicable survival period therefor as described above expires.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Satisfaction shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Nevada, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law thereof. The Company and the Investor irrevocably consent to the jurisdiction of the United States federal courts and state courts located in the State of Nevada in any suit or proceeding based on or arising under this Satisfaction and irrevocably agree that all claims in respect of such suit or proceeding may be determined in such courts.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: INOL has duly and timely filed in proper form all Tax Returns for all Taxes required to be filed with the appropriate Regulatory Authority, and has paid all taxes required to be paid in respect thereof except where such failure would not have a Material Adverse Effect on INOL, except where, if not filed or paid, the exception(s) have been documented by INOL to 8687544.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: was properly asserted under subsection (6) because, separate from the bad faith issue, he also alleged that the state’s action of seizing his settlement funds was unjust. A motion based upon subsection (6), permitting relief from a judgment for “any other reason” need only be filed “within a reasonable time.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). “What constitutes a reasonable time is dependent on the particular facts of the case in question and is reviewed for abuse of discretion.” Watkins v. Lundell, 169 F.3d 540, 544 (8th Cir L.Ed.2d 216 (2002); Watkins, 169 F.3d at 544 (expressing “considerable trepidation” about whether a 17-month delay was reasonable, but ultimately finding that the issue was not properly before the court); Nucor Corp. v. Neb. Pub. Power Dist., 999 F.2d 372, 374-75 (8th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). No mitigating circumstances exist to render Options: A. holding a delay approaching one year is presumptively unreasonable B. holding a plaintiffs rule 60b3 motion untimely where a three and onehalf month delay had occurred with no explanation as to the reason for the delay C. holding that delay for three and onehalf years was unreasonable under rule 60b6 D. holding a three and onehalf year delay was unreasonable E. holding that by itself three and onehalf months was insufficient to prove causation

assistant: The best answer is D. holding a three and onehalf year delay was unreasonable
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: To the extent that any court action is permitted consistent with or to enforce Section 10 of this Agreement, the parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of the State of California and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Accordingly, with respect to any such court action, the Executive (a) submits to the personal jurisdiction of such courts; (b) consents to service of process; and (c) waives any other requirement (whether imposed by statute, rule of court, or otherwise) with respect to personal jurisdiction or service of process.

assistant: Consent To Jurisdiction