flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: To the knowledge of the Parent Borrower, each of Holdings, the Parent Borrower and its Restricted Subsidiaries has filed or caused to be filed all other material tax returns which are required to be filed by it and has paid (a) all taxes shown to be due and payable on such returns and (b) all taxes shown to be due and payable on any assessments of which it has received notice made against it or any of its property (including the Mortgaged Fee Properties) and all other taxes, fees or other charges imposed on it or any of its property by any Governmental Authority (other than any (i) taxes, fees or other charges with respect to which the failure to pay, in the aggregate, would not have a Material Adverse Effect or (ii) taxes, fees or other charges the amount or validity of which are currently being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted and with respect to which reserves in conformity with GAAP have been provided on the books of Holdings, the Parent Borrower or its Restricted Subsidiaries, as the case may be); and no tax Liens have been filed (except for Liens for taxes not yet due and payable), and no claim is being asserted in writing, with respect to any such tax, fee or other charge.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: State’s decision to characterize that failure as a finding drat K.S. was incompetent to testify. Yet the record demonstrates the State consistently and adamantly characterized Simpson’s efforts to prevent the witness from testifying as a disqualification issue and repeatedly urged the district court to conduct a hearing on her competency as required by statute. The district court’s failure to focus on the State’s argument or to provide any clear basis for its ruling should not fall upon the State. Instead, I would hold that the district court clearly abused its discretion by failing to identify or isolate any legal basis for its harsh ruling despite the State’s efforts to provide the court with a framework for doing, so. See State v. Hernandez, 294 Kan. 200, 207, 273 P.3d 774 (2012) (<HOLDING>); State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 550, 256 P.3d Options: A. holding trial court abused its discretion when it struck the appellants intervention B. holding that the bia abused its discretion when it denied petitioners motion to reopen by failing to consider evidence of country conditions C. holding trial court abused its discretion by refusing to conduct hearing and render decision on motion D. holding trial court abused its discretion when it denied a motion for mistrial after erroneously concluding an issue could be dealt with at sentencing E. holding that the district court acted within its discretion when it denied plaintiffs request for counsel

assistant: The best answer is D. holding trial court abused its discretion when it denied a motion for mistrial after erroneously concluding an issue could be dealt with at sentencing
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any term or provision of this Agreement may be waived, or the time for its performance may be extended, by the party hereto entitled to the benefit thereof. Any such waiver shall be validly and sufficiently given for the purposes of this Agreement if, as to either party hereto, it is in writing signed by such party or an authorized representative thereof. Failure on the part of the Company or Employee at any time to insist on strict compliance by the other party with any provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the obligations of either party hereto in respect thereof, or of either such party’s right hereunder to require strict compliance therewith in the future. No waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: two cases cited by the State in support of its position, Gonzalez and Tovar-Rico, are inapposite. At issue in both cases was whether or not the consent was freely given, not whether a retroactive consent va .Ed.2d 1138 (1978); Martin v. United States (D.C. 1989), 567 A.2d 896, 906 n. 23 (“We assume without deciding (since the point has not been briefed or argued) that consent. .. can be retroactive, provided that the person giving the consent intends it to be retroactive.”). On the other hand, we also located cases that, although distinguishable from this case to varying degrees, all fairly stand for the proposition that a consent must precede a search and seizure for it to provide a valid exception to the warrant requirement. See U.S. v. Wilson (5th Cir. 1994), 36 F.3d 1298, 1304-05 (<HOLDING>)(emphasis in original); United States v. Options: A. holding that warrantless search of defendants vehicle was legal because defendants consent was voluntary even through he was in police custody at the time of giving consent B. holding that a search exceeded the scope of the initial oral consent and was not validated by a subsequent written consent an allegedly consensual seizure must stand or fall on the basis of the consent preexisting the seizure C. holding that hotel night clerks consent to search an occupied guest room was not valid consent and the evidence obtained from the search was inadmissible D. holding that evidence was inadmissible because it was not within the scope of defendants oral preseizure consent to a cursory visual inspection and the seizure was conducted prior to not pursuant to the defendants written consent to conduct a complete search E. holding that the defendants consent to allow the officer to search her purse by way of holding it open for the officer was for consent to a limited view of the purses interior not to surrender possession for an unrestricted search and thus the officer exceeded the scope of the defendants consent

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that evidence was inadmissible because it was not within the scope of defendants oral preseizure consent to a cursory visual inspection and the seizure was conducted prior to not pursuant to the defendants written consent to conduct a complete search
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: find any plain error. Although the record does show that the defendant is black and the victim was white, it does not show that the state exercised any of its peremptory challenges to remove prospective black jurors from the veni-re. The record as a whole simply does not raise an inference that the state was engaged in the practice of purposeful discrimination. Under the plain error rule this Court will ‘notice any plain error or defect in the proceeding under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial -rights of the petitioner.’ (Emphasis added.) Rule 39(k), supra. The defendant cannot successfully ar-güe that error is pla p.2005)(<HOLDING>). In another analogous situation, this Court Options: A. holding that trial counsel will not be convicted of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to engage in futile acts B. holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record C. holding no ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim for failure to raise as basis for appeal of conviction ineffective assistance of trial counsel where basis for the latter claim was inadequate D. holding that an ambiguous or silent record will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel E. recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that an ambiguous or silent record will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries has timely filed or caused to be filed all Tax returns and reports required to have been filed and has paid or caused to be paid all Taxes required to have been paid by it, except (a) Taxes that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which the Borrower or such Subsidiary, as applicable, has set aside on its books adequate reserves or (b) to the extent that the failure to do so would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: was $500.00. However, a few months later the Texas Constitution was amended and the jurisdictional minimum was deleted. As amended Article V, section 8 now provides, in pertinent part: District Court jurisdiction consists of exclusive, appellate, and original jurisdic tion of all actions, proceedings, and remedies, except in cases where exclusive, appellate, or original jurisdiction may be conferred by this constitution or other law on some other court, tribunal, or administrative body. Tex. Const, art. V, § 8. After the constitutional amendment, some courts of appeals have determined the jurisdictional limit is $200.01, while others have continued to require a $500.00 minimum amount in controversy. Compare Acreman v. Sharp, 282 S.W.3d 251, 255-56 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2009, no pet.)(<HOLDING>), Ramirez v. Dietz, No. 07-04-0108-CV, 2006 WL Options: A. holding that court of claims has jurisdiction over actions for breach of standard contract B. holding that district court can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a coplaintiff claim that fails to meet the amount in controversy requirement C. holding over D. holding that the court may presume it has jurisdiction over a case once the plaintiffs initial burden of establishing jurisdiction has been satisfied E. holding express language of government code and constitution provides trial court has jurisdiction over case in which amount in controversy was over 20000

assistant: The best answer is E. holding express language of government code and constitution provides trial court has jurisdiction over case in which amount in controversy was over 20000
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the conduct was sufficiently extreme to result in liability.” Taking all of Taing’s evidence as true, Farrens’ conduct is not in the ballpark of Washington’s standard for outrageousness, and the summary judgment evidence does not support the more extreme characterization of events contained in Taing’s pleadings and briefs. Evidence that Farrens might have yelled at Taing once, combined with continued lecturing when Taing asked her to stop so her blood “won’t go up and up,” simply are not the types of behavior that Washington law recognizes as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized society. There is no evidence that Farrens continued her lecturing after Taing began to manifest symptoms of illness or an anxiety attack, nor was there evidence that Tain 2d 536, 539 (9th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). Boeing relies on Saridakis v. United Options: A. holding that plaintiffs state law claim against a nonsignatory to the cba was preempted by 301 B. holding claim not preempted where court is required to read and apply cba provisions that are neither uncertain nor ambiguous C. holding that a claim based on a supervisors circulation of a suspension letter accusing the plaintiff of cocaine use was not preempted despite cba provisions authorizing employee discipline D. holding that the plaintiffs claim that he was owed wages following his discharge was preempted because this right was created by a cba provision stating that an employee who is discharged shall be paid immediately E. holding that plaintiffs retaliatory discharge claim under michigan law was not preempted because the statelaw tort of retaliatory discharge creates rights independent of those established by the collective bargaining agreement further holding that discrimination claim was not preempted even though the employer was likely to rely on provisions of the cba in its defense

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a claim based on a supervisors circulation of a suspension letter accusing the plaintiff of cocaine use was not preempted despite cba provisions authorizing employee discipline
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Restricted Stock Units (and Dividend Equivalent Rights associated with the Restricted Stock Units) shall be unvested and shall be subject to the restrictions set forth in this Award Agreement and the Award Notice. Unless sooner forfeited in accordance with Section 5, the Restricted Stock Units and Dividend Equivalent Rights associated with the Restricted Stock Unit shall be vested for a Grantee as set forth in the Grantee’s Award Notice.

assistant: Vesting
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: you or group members no longer wishing to receive such messages can opt-out of receiving further messages from microsoft or microsoft-controlled affiliates at any time by following the instructions provided .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: v. Malotke, 32 Mich.App. 289, 188 N.W.2d 673, 675-76 (1971), which expressly held that the oral statements of a trial judge did not constitute the rendition of a judgment of divorce because those statements were prospective in nature and did not completely settle the division of property between the couple. Accord Heck v. Bailey, 204 Mich. 54, 169 N.W. 940, 941 (1918); Stackhouse v. Stackhouse, 193 Mich.App. 437, 484 N.W.2d 723, 725 (1992); People v. Turner, 181 Mich.App. 680, 449 N.W.2d 680, 681-82 (1989) (per curiam); Hall v. Fortino, 158 Mich.App. 663, 405 N.W.2d 106, 108 (1986); People v. Stackpoole, 144 Mich.App. 291, 375 N.W.2d 419, 423 (1985); see also Department of Treasury v. Central Wayne County Sanitation Auth., 186 Mich.App. 58, 463 N.W.2d 120, 123-24 (1990) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). This confusion in the Michigan cases has not Options: A. holding summary judgment order was not a final judgment because it did not dispose of the defendants claim for attorneys fees B. holding resentencing does not affect the date on which the judgment of conviction became final C. holding that the failure of the appellant to discuss in the opening brief an issue on which the trial court might have relied as a basis for its judgment results in an affirmance of that judgment D. holding that a claim for interest on a money judgment did not accrue until the judgment was rendered which was the date on which the trial court issued its order E. holding that interest does not begin to accrue until the date of judgment not the date of verdict

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a claim for interest on a money judgment did not accrue until the judgment was rendered which was the date on which the trial court issued its order
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Neither Party may issue a press releases or otherwise disclose the existence or terms of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party; provided, however, that once the existence or any terms or conditions of this Agreement has been publicly disclosed in a manner mutually and reasonably agreed-to by the Parties, either Party may republish the facts previously disclosed without the prior consent of the other Party. COH may, in its sole discretion and without the approval of Licensee, publicly disclose the existence of this Agreement and the overall potential value of the Agreement to COH, so long as the detailed and specific terms and conditions of this Agreement are not disclosed. If a third party inquires whether a license is available, COH may disclose the existence of the Agreement and the extent of its grant in Section 3.1 to such third party, but will not disclose the name of the Licensee, except where COH is required to release information under either the California Public Records Act or other applicable law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, COH may disclose an unredacted copy of this Agreement as required under any obligations as applicable to the PCF Grant.

assistant: Publicity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: inability to perform according to the dictates of the order or decree; however, the defendant bears the duty to prove his inability with particularity and not in general terms. In re Guardianship of McClinton, 157 So.3d 862, 873 (¶ 33) (Miss.Ct.App.2015) (internal citations omitted). ¶ 27. Although the chancellor found Karen in contempt, he also found Karen’s contempt was not willful since the parties’ verbal communications about Karen’s failure to satisfy her obligations were open to more than one interpretation. In reviewing this issue, we find it was within the chancellor's discretion to find that, although Karen failed to comply with the prior court order, her noncompliance was neither willful nor deliberate. See Brawdy v. Howell, 841 So.2d 1175, 1181 (¶23) (Miss.Ct.App.2003) (<HOLDING>). Because we cannot say that the chancellor’s Options: A. holding it was within the chancellors discretion to find that though the husband was in contempt the contempt was not willful B. holding that a civil contempt defendant has a right to a jury trial when the act of contempt was not committed in the presence of the court and when the incarceration is in part punitive C. holding that an attorney charged with contempt for failing to attend a scheduled hearing could be charged only with indirect not direct contempt because the contempt did not occur in open court and the judge did not have personal knowledge of the reasons for the attorneys nonappearance D. holding one man grand jury that held witness in contempt and sentenced him to prison was contempt proceeding to which there was a right to public access E. holding that in addition to statutory contempt powers city courts have inherent contempt power

assistant: The best answer is A. holding it was within the chancellors discretion to find that though the husband was in contempt the contempt was not willful
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: In determining whether a defendant may be prosecuted and punished for multiple offenses arising from a si Rptr. 782 (1967) (upholding multiple punishment of a defendant for offenses of unlawful possession of burglar’s tools and unlawful possession of a firearm even though both offenses arose from the same occurrence); and People v. Robertson, 67 Mich.App. 603, 242 N.W.2d 24 (1976) (upholding multiple punishment of a defendant for the offenses of possession of marijuana and possession of a stolen gun where there was no unified purpose in relationship between the two offenses, only mere temporal happenstance). Affirmed. 1 . The United States Supreme Court recently dealt with the problem in a more limited way in Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 98 S.Ct. 1173, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978) (<HOLDING>). For a discussion of the limited nature of the Options: A. recognizing ability of one or more joint tortfeasors to settle on behalf of themselves and another joint tortfeasor and then pursue that joint tortfeasor for its share of the settlement payment B. holding specifical ly that whenever a trial court improperly requires joint representation over a timely objection by defense counsel that joint representation carries with it a risk of conflict of interest reversal is automatic C. holding that the defendant was deprived of his sixth amendment right to counsel where appointed counsels representation presented a conflict of interest D. holding that the rights conferred to a joint account holder by massachusetts statutes and case law in fact give a joint account holder legal title in a joint account E. holding that because the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to separate counsel in light of the courts unambiguous advisement that joint representation could present a very substantial conflict so far as his defense is concerned the defendant was precluded from claiming ineffective assistance of counsel due to the conflict of interest that ultimately developed

assistant: The best answer is B. holding specifical ly that whenever a trial court improperly requires joint representation over a timely objection by defense counsel that joint representation carries with it a risk of conflict of interest reversal is automatic
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Jean Fiore and the Defendant, Richard O. Hilliker.” Accordingly, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Mr. Hilliker on that basis. Mr. Hilliker argues on appeal that because there is neither a common plan nor mutual restrictions, the restriction could be enforced by the Fiores only if there was language in the deed itself expressly giving them the right to do so. Additionally, the appellee law firm argues that the “conditions” in Schedule B on which the Fiores rely were personal to Mr. Spivey, and not covenants running with the land. We decline to address these arguments because they were not raised in Mr. Hilliker’s summary judgment motion, nor were they addressed in the trial court’s order. See Rosenberg v. Cape Coral Plumbing, Inc., 920 So.2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. Bank of Am. Corp., 927 So.2d 1091 Options: A. holding that the trial court may not grant summary judgment on a ground not raised in the motion B. holding that trial court did not err in ruling on appellees motion for summary judgment before appellees complied with appellants discovery request when the record reflected that appellant filed a motion to compel three days before the hearing and the record did not reveal any effort on the part of appellant to secure a ruling from the trial court on its motion to compel or object at the trial court hearing the motion for summary judgment prior to ruling on the motion to compel C. holding that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment the trial court is limited to the grounds raised in the motion D. holding that a summary judgment motion must stand or fall on the grounds expressly presented in the motion E. holding that a trial court can only consider admissible evidence in ruling on a motion for summary judgment

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment the trial court is limited to the grounds raised in the motion
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Unclaimed amounts shall consist of the amounts of the Deferred Compensation Account of a Participant that cannot be distributed because of the Plan Administrator’s inability, after a reasonable search, to locate a Participant or his Beneficiary, as applicable, within a period of two (2) years after the date upon which the payment of benefits become due. Unclaimed amounts shall be forfeited at the end of such two-year period. These forfeitures will reduce the obligations of the Company under the Plan. After an unclaimed amount has been forfeited, the Participant or Beneficiary, as applicable, shall have no further right to his Deferred Compensation Account.

assistant: Forfeitures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be terminated by any Purchaser, as to such Purchaser’s obligations hereunder only and without any effect whatsoever on the obligations between the Company and the other Purchasers, by written notice to the other parties, if the Closing has not been consummated on or before October __, 2017; provided , however , that no such termination will affect the right of any party to sue for any breach by any other party (or parties).

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you are or become a course contributor , you may offer to translate or have translated certain existing courses into other languages and you may offer to contribute new courses to the service , as agreed between you and duolingo on a case-by-case basis .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: conclusion misplaces the fault for any anti-competitive effect that may have occurred. AT&T’s decision to not pay the invoiced rate means they paid a lower rate than TWC during that time period, but the timing of CPS Energy’s collection efforts is not the cause of that effect. Whether an attaching entity pays the rate charged is a matter not entirely within an MOU’s control. While an MOU can make collection efforts, whether those efforts are successful is also not entirely within the MOU’s control. Moreover, many different factors may affect .a collecting entity’s analysis of when and how to pursue collection, and therefore, attempting to identify “meaningful action” to collect in the absence of legislative guidance appears arbitrary and capricious. See Charter Med., 665 S.W.2d at 454 (<HOLDING>). The collusion and fraud scenarios suggested Options: A. holding that chevron deference is due only when the agency acts pursuant to delegated authority and the agency action has the force of law B. holding that an agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously if it entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem C. holding that an agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously if it reverses its position in the face of a precedent it has not persuasively distinguished D. holding that agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously when it improperly bases its decision on nonstatutory criteria E. holding that an agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously if it entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem or offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously when it improperly bases its decision on nonstatutory criteria
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The section and paragraph headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. They do not purport to, and should not be deemed to define, limit, or extend the scope or intent of any section or paragraph. This Agreement has been negotiated by the Parties, and legal or equitable principles that might require the construction of this Agreement or any provision of this Agreement against the party drafting this Agreement will not apply in any construction or interpretation of this Agreement.

assistant: Construction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: in the event that you are eligible for a refund , and you pay a fee to utilize your account for a fixed period of time ( `` fixed fees '' ) , blizzard entertainment shall provide you with a `` pro rata '' refund in the same currency as the currency of payment equal to the fixed fees for the most recent billing period , less the daily charge for the service multiplied by the number of days that the service was available in that billing period .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No party hereto may assign any of his or its rights or obligations hereunder, by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written approval of the other Party to this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each of the Parties hereto and their respective successors, permitted assigns, estates, heirs, executors and personal representatives.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except for issues or matters as to which federal law is applicable, this Waiver and Release of Claims shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey without giving effect to the conflicts of law principles thereof.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Grantor will pay any taxes, assessments and similar imposts and charges, which are now or hereafter may become a Lien upon any of the Collateral, in accordance with the terms and requirements of the Loan Agreement.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: plans may effectively limit them to services offered at Grant does not alter this conclusion. If plaintiffs’ practice of pain medicine is, as Dr. Leak avers, truly more cost effective than traditional pain management used by anesthesiologists, then both the hospitals at which plaintiffs have privileges and plaintiffs have a competitive advantage over the defendant anesthesiologists. See Dr. Leak affidavit para. 24 & exhibit D. If pain medicine is more cost-effective than traditional pain management, then in an open and competitive marketplace managed care insurance plans should eventually be more inclined to designate those hospitals at which pain medicine is practiced. See Capital Imaging Assoc., P.C. v. Mohawk Valley Medical Assoc., Inc., 725 F.Supp. 669, 673 (N.D.N.Y. 1989) (<HOLDING>). In these circumstances, the Court concludes Options: A. recognizing right to privacy in receipt of health care services to the extent consistent with providing adequate medical care and the safety and good order of the facility B. holding whistleblower protections available under the washington health care act rcw 4370075 adequately promoted workplace safety ensured compliance with the accepted standard of care and prevented fraudulent billing in the health care industry C. recognizing that the selective nature of managed care insurance plans is procompetitive and reduces health care costs D. holding claim that negligent supervision caused assault was health care liability claim because it was inseparable from the health care and nursing services provided E. holding that standard of care need not be listed separately in report when same standard applies to each health care provider

assistant: The best answer is C. recognizing that the selective nature of managed care insurance plans is procompetitive and reduces health care costs
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Borrower has full power, authority and legal right to enter into this Agreement and the Other Documents to which it is a party and to perform all its respective Obligations hereunder and thereunder. This Agreement and the Other Documents to which it is a party have been duly executed and delivered by each Borrower, and this Agreement and the Other Documents to which it is a party constitute the legal, valid and binding obligation of such Borrower enforceable in accordance with their terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and of the Other Documents to which it is a party (a) are within such Borrower’s corporate or company powers, as applicable, have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate or company action, as applicable, are not in contravention of law or the terms of such Borrower’s Organizational Documents or to the conduct of such Borrower’s business or of any Material Contract or undertaking to which such Borrower is a party or by which such Borrower is bound, (b) will not conflict with or violate any law or regulation, or any judgment, order or decree of any Governmental Body, (c) will not require the Consent of any Governmental Body, any party to a Material Contract or any other Person, except those Consents set forth on Schedule 5.1 hereto, all of which will have been duly obtained, made or compiled prior to the Closing Date and which are in full force and effect and (d) will not conflict with, nor result in any breach in any of the provisions of or constitute a default under or result in the creation of any Lien except Permitted Encumbrances upon any asset of such Borrower under the provisions of any agreement, instrument, or other document to which such Borrower is a party or by which it or its property is a party or by which it may be bound.

assistant: Authority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Schedules A, B and C hereto list the Eligible Employees who have satisfied the conditions for Plan participation and the date as of which each such Eligible Employee became a Participant. The Committee shall cause Schedules A, B and C to be updated from time to time to reflect the Participants who are currently participating in the Plan. An employee who becomes an Eligible Employee on or after January 1, 2014 shall become a Schedule C Participant. However, if an Eligible Employee is newly hired or promoted into a position reflected on Schedule B as of June 16, 2014, the Eligible Employee shall become a Schedule A Participant.

assistant: Participations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: both Henry and Noel attested that the calendaring responsibility in his office lies solely with his assistants, and that in this instance, his assistants failed to calendar the deadlines set forth m the relevant standing orders. Moreover, office preparations for Hurricane Matthew contributed to the assistants’ failure to follow normal office procedure and calendar the deadlines. Counsel also attested that but for the failure to calendar the deadlines, he would have objected to the time sheets submitted by Reverse Mortgage and Nutter. These undisputed facts constitute the type of secretarial error or breakdown in normal office procedure, which constitute excusable neglect pursuant to rule 1.540(b). See Carter, Hawley, Hale Stores, Inc. v. Whitman, 516 So.2d 83, 83-84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (<HOLDING>). III. CONCLUSION Because the failure to comply Options: A. holding that neglectful but understandable breakdown in defendants established office practice that resulted in the complaint being lost on the desk of general counsel constituted excusable neglect B. recognizing that although the term good cause is undefined it is at least as demanding as the excusable neglect standard C. recognizing that a prosecutors office is an entity and that information in the possession of one attorney in the office must be attributed to the office as a whole D. holding that good cause means at a minimum excusable neglect E. holding that an outofstate attorney paying rent for a desk in an attorneys instate office had satisfied the office requirement

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that neglectful but understandable breakdown in defendants established office practice that resulted in the complaint being lost on the desk of general counsel constituted excusable neglect
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 2.1. Either party agrees that it shall ensure that it and its associated companies and their respective officers and employees shall keep confidential, both during and after the duration of the agreement, all information which: And undertakes not to disclose any of such information to any third party without the prior written permission of the other party except as required by any applicable law or government regulation, and provided that each party may disclose the agreement on a confidential basis to its public accountants, attorneys and financial advisors and/or funders.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower and each Subsidiary thereof is in compliance in all material respects with the requirements of all Laws and all orders, writs, injunctions and decrees applicable to it or to its properties, except in such instances in which (a) such requirement of Law or order, writ, injunction or decree is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted or (b) the failure to comply therewith, either individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Change .

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of benefits based on the monthly amount prescribed by statute in 1969 ($411.69) and in the months after February 1969 through July 1996; he is not entitled to receive an award based on the 1996 monthly amount ($3,104.00) for each of the months in between 1969 and 1996 because that amount was not provided for by statute during all of those months. Contrary to the appellant’s argument, see Appellant’s Br. at 5, 9-10, nowhere does section 5109A(b) provide that the corrected decision shall have the effect that the prior decision containing CUE had never been made; rather, the statute provides, in effect, that the erroneous decision, when made, was decided correctly. Moreover, the appellant’s argument that his case is distinguishable from Smith (Claudus) v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 227 (2000) (<HOLDING>), aff'd sub nom. Smith v. Principi, 281 F.3d Options: A. holding that the waiver of sovereign immunity must be clear and unequivocal B. holding that 38 usc 503 is not express waiver of sovereign immunity that would permit interest payment on award of pastdue benefits C. holding that the united states is liable for interest only in the event of a clear statutory waiver of sovereign immunity D. holding that 28 usc 1331 does not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity E. holding that the alien tort statute itself is not a waiver of sovereign immunity

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that 38 usc 503 is not express waiver of sovereign immunity that would permit interest payment on award of pastdue benefits
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: claim under the ADA, we reject Russell’s disparate treatment argument vis-a-vis her sex discrimination claim under Title VII. As explained above, in accordance with facts not genuinely disputed, we cannot reasonably infer that the infractions committed by Drew and Evans were of comparable seriousness to Russell’s. C. Retaliation claim Finally, Russell argues that the District Court erred in holding that she failed to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to her retaliation claim. She contends that her retaliation claim is reasonably related to, or grows out of, the substance of her allegations in the administrative charge and therefore was sufficiently exhausted. Brief for Appellant at 55-57 (citing, e.g., Stuart v. Gen. Motors Corp., 217 F.3d 621, 631 (8th Cir. 2000) (<HOLDING>)). In support of this argument, Russell Options: A. holding that claimant exhausted administrative remedies only as to the complaints made in the original charge and factually related claims that reasonably could be expected to grow out of the administrative investigation of that charge B. holding that regarded as claim is reasonably related to claim of discrimination on the basis of disability alleged in eeoc charge C. recognizing that a claim is administratively exhausted if it is specifically stated in grows out of or is reasonably related to the substance of the allegations in an administrative charge or complaint D. holding individual employee may assert unexhausted retaliation claim if the later claim is reasonably related to the allegations in the employees timely filed charge E. holding sexual harassment claim was not like or related to retaliation allegations and therefore was outside the scope of the administrative charge

assistant: The best answer is C. recognizing that a claim is administratively exhausted if it is specifically stated in grows out of or is reasonably related to the substance of the allegations in an administrative charge or complaint
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the Eleventh Circuit, it is well-settled that the Bankruptcy Court can impose contempt sanctions on a violator of the automatic stay as it could for the violation of any of its orders. Jove Eng’g, Inc. v. I.R.S., 92 F.3d 1539, 1546 (11th Cir.1996) ("We have characterized the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) as ‘essentially a court-ordered injunction, [and] any person or entity who violates the stay may be found in contempt of court.’ ” (quoting Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.1992))). Although, as Jove later states, the stay has some aspects that are dissimilar from other court orders, these differences do not implicate the fundamental aspect of similarity in view here — the protection of the dignity and jurisdiction of the court. See In re Rushing, 443 B.R. at 85 (<HOLDING>). 27 . H.R.Rep. No. 95-595, at 10, reprinted in Options: A. recognizing a heightened interest in ensuring discipline in police departments B. recognizing each individual bankruptcy courts unique interest in interpreting and enforcing stay in pending cases C. recognizing that congress has a legitimate interest in ensuring that a child who becomes an american citizen has a real relationship with a family unit and with the united states D. recognizing statutory nature of stay but concluding that court still has interest in ensuring compliance E. recognizing statutory credit

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing statutory nature of stay but concluding that court still has interest in ensuring compliance
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Board, acting in its sole discretion, may amend the Plan at any time and from time to time and may terminate the Plan at any time. Plan amendments will be subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders if and to the extent such approval is required in order to satisfy applicable law and/or stock exchange listing rules. If not sooner terminated, the Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the date it is adopted by the Board.

assistant: Amendments