flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: denying B-S Steel injunctive relief. Nevertheless, we are precluded from reversing the district court’s summary judgment on this ground because B-S Steel is no longer a purchaser of WFB from the appellees and has failed to show any possibility that it might resume such purchases in the future. As indicated above, a plaintiff must have made reasonably contemporaneous purchases in order to show a violation of § 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act. Without such purchases, there can be no causal connection between the threatened injury that B-S Steel alleges and a violation of § 2(a). Nor would any such injury be one that this provision could remedy in practice. A consideration of the factors listed above thus militates against recognizing standing here. See H.L. Hayden Co., 879 F.2d at 1022 (<HOLDING>). B-S Steel points to an Eighth Circuit case as Options: A. holding that there is no due process right to appellate review B. holding where there is no duty to defend there is no duty to indemnify C. holding that since the defendant is no longer selling to plaintiffs as is its right there is no danger that it will sell to them on discriminatory terms in violation of 15 usc 13 1982 and accordingly no basis for a robinsonpatman injunction D. recognizing that a claim is an assertion of a right and if there is no assertion of a right there is no claim to deduct E. holding that it is well settled that there is no constitutional right to an appeal

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that since the defendant is no longer selling to plaintiffs as is its right there is no danger that it will sell to them on discriminatory terms in violation of 15 usc 13 1982 and accordingly no basis for a robinsonpatman injunction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to recover the monies owed under the Consulting Agreement.” R.65 ¶ 7. Although Segal did not file the C gument that disability payments under an insurance policy in which the debtor had a pre-petition interest were property of the estate under § 541(a)(6); although such payments were intended to be a substitute for earned wages, they were available only when a policyholder was incapable of performing services). 18 . This issue is arguably waived as Segal made a single reference to "personal services" in his 82-paragraph Answer in the underlying adversary proceeding, but did not raise this argument in his summary judgment opposition or at oral argument on the motion. See Buncher Co. v. Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of GenFarm Ltd. P’ship IV, 229 F.3d 245, 253 (3d Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). the Consulting Agreement payments as wages Options: A. holding that issues not raised before a district court are waived on appeal B. holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal C. holding arguments not raised on appeal waived D. holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal E. holding that where an issue is raised in the district court but raised late and the district court declines to deem the issue waived the issue may be raised on appeal

assistant: The best answer is D. holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 836. However, this rule, cited by the State, is inapposite where, as here, we have no cause to question the lower court findings that Nichols could not have, through due diligence, located Ishman without her correct name and address in Louisiana. 8 . Ishman’s statements in 1992 and 1997 are hardly consistent on several points, e.g., whether Cindy Johnson could have witnessed the shooting; whether Johnson actually saw Shaffer with a gun in hand; at what point she ran to the back of the store; when she spoke to the police. Moreover, her use of multiple names and reluctance to aid the investigation because of her own troubles with the law would have rendered her testimony somewhat vulnerable. 9 . Tex. Pen.Code §§ 7.01, 7.02. 10 . See Davis v. State, 597 S.W.2d 358, 360 (Tex.Crim.App.1980)(<HOLDING>); Callins v. Collins, 998 F.2d 269, 278 (5th Options: A. holding that a robber has no right of selfdefense against his victim B. holding that an employee has no right of action against an employer for wrongful discharge where no clear mandate of public policy is violated thereby C. holding that no right of action is given to the estate of the victim of a tort but is granted only to his heirs if there are no heirs no right of action vests in anybody D. holding that a defendant has a constitutional right to counsel as a matter of right on direct appeal E. holding that there is no right of recovery against individual defendants under the ada

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a robber has no right of selfdefense against his victim
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The parties to this Guaranty agree that, on the Closing Date, the terms and provisions of the Original Guaranty shall be and hereby are amended, superseded and restated in their entirety by the terms and provisions of this Guaranty. All obligations incurred under the Original Guaranty which are outstanding on the Closing Date shall continue as Guaranteed Obligations under (and shall be governed by the terms of) this Guaranty and the other Loan Documents. Without limiting the foregoing, upon the effectiveness hereof: (a) all references in any existing Loan Documents to the “Guaranty” shall be deemed to refer to this Guaranty and (b) all obligations constituting “Guaranteed Obligations” (as referred to and defined in the Original Guaranty) which are outstanding on the Closing Date shall continue as Guaranteed Obligations under this Guaranty.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: was to prevent the agency from “sitting on” applications ripe for review, whereas here, the application is not ripe for review because it is missing an essential element that is outside the agency’s control. Defendants urge the Court to adopt the reasoning set forth in Walji v. Gonzales, 2007 WL 1747911 (5th Cir.2007) Walji I). In Walji I, the Fifth Circuit held that “when the CIS examination is premature because the mandatory security investigation is not complete, the 120-day time period of [ ] § 1447(b) does not begin to run....” 2007 WL 1747911, 2007 U.S.App. LEXIS 14450, at *8. However, after Defendants filed their motion, the Fifth Circuit granted Walji’s petition for reheating and reversed its previous opinion. See Walji v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 432, 433 (5th Cir.2007) (Walji II) (<HOLDING>). Even before Walji I was reversed, Defendants Options: A. holding that the statute of limitations period begins to run when the allegedly discriminatory pension plan is applied to the plaintiffs and leaving determination of the actual date the statute begins to run on each claim to the district court B. holding that limitation period begins to run at the time of the breach C. holding that the limitations period begins to run at the time that the parties first enter into the franchise agreement D. holding that the 120day time period begins to run after the agencys initial interview of the applicant E. holding that the 120day period commences when the applicant appears in person for the interview

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the 120day time period begins to run after the agencys initial interview of the applicant
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing or would result from the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any other Loan Document. No Loan Party or any subsidiary is in default in the performance, observance or fulfillment of any of the obligations, covenants or conditions contained in any agreement to which it is a party or other contractual obligation by which it is bound (other than an agreement or other contractual obligations evidencing or governing any Indebtedness), in each case, which default would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: No Defaults
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 1. Confidential Information is defined as any information, whether written or verbal, of either party hereto, (Disclosing Party) which is disclosed to or observed by the other party (Receiving Party) in connection with or as a result of the evaluation of any possible transaction between the University of Arkansas at Little Rock and ______________________________ and which is, at the time of disclosure, marked as being Confidential or Proprietary, or is reasonably identifiable as confidential, proprietary information of the Disclosing Party pertaining to information in the areas of (subject matter): _______________________________________________ ___________________________. Confidential Information that is disclosed verbally will also be included as proprietary.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The exchange of copies of this Agreement and of signature pages by facsimile transmission or other electronic means shall constitute effective execution and delivery of this Agreement as to the parties and may be used in lieu of the original Agreement for all purposes. Signatures of the parties transmitted by facsimile or other electronic means shall be deemed to be their original signatures for any purposes whatsoever.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the Indemnification Agreement between the Company and the Executive with the same date hereof contains the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall not be modified in any manner except by instrument in writing signed, by or on behalf of, the parties hereto. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Schedule 3.1(o) contains a complete and accurate list and description of all material Intellectual Property Rights and of all contracts (including Term Sheets and oral agreements) relating to the Intellectual Property Rights to which the Company is a party or by which the Company is bound, except for any license implied by the sale of a product and perpetual, paid-up licenses for commonly available software programs with a value of less than $10,000 under which the Company is the licensee.

assistant: Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 1 . While I must begin the sentencing process by "correctly calculating the applicable Guidelines range,” Gall v. United States, - U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007), I may reject a sentence within the range "because a sentence within the Guidelines fails to reflect the other [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors or 'because the case warrants a different sentence regardless.’ ” United States v. Evans, 526 F.3d 155, 164 (4th Cir.2008) (quoting Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2465, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007)). 2 . Though the defendant's wife owned the guns seized from the house, the defendant at the least constructively possessed them, and therefore may share his wife’s status as a collector. See United States v. Mojica, 214 F.3d 1169, 1171-74 (10th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Moit, 100 F.3d 605, 606-07 Options: A. holding that defendant had standing to challenge the seizure of a box regardless of who owned it because it was in a house owned and possessed by defendant B. holding that the defendants sentence had been improperly enhanced where there was no evidence that the defendant constructively possessed or exercised control over the weapon C. holding that a defendant who had constructively possessed a shotgun that was owned by his brother and used solely for lawful sporting purposes was entitled to a reduction under ussg 2k21b2 D. holding that a defendant who had maintained his fathers gun collection at his home deserved a reduction under ussg 2k21b2 E. holding that a defendant possessed a dangerous weapon for purposes of ussg 2dllbl when law enforcement discovered a shotgun in the defendants home after the completion of the crimes

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a defendant who had constructively possessed a shotgun that was owned by his brother and used solely for lawful sporting purposes was entitled to a reduction under ussg 2k21b2
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company is duly incorporated and validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has all requisite corporate power and authority to own or lease its properties and assets and to conduct its business as it is presently being conducted.

assistant: Organizations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by it and (assuming due execution and delivery by the other Parties) is a legal, valid and binding obligation of it enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as that enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency and other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and except that equitable remedies may be granted only in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction. Each of the contracts, agreements and instruments required by this Agreement to be delivered by it will at the Closing have been duly executed and delivered by it and (assuming due execution and delivery by the other parties thereto) will at Closing be enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as that enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and except that equitable remedies may be granted only in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction.

assistant: Enforceability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, each of the Rosehill Entities carries, or is covered by, insurance from insurers of recognized financial responsibility in such amounts and covering such risks as is reasonably adequate for the conduct of their respective businesses and the value of their respective properties and as is customary for companies engaged in similar businesses in similar industries, including, without limitation, policies covering real and personal property owned or leased by the Rosehill Entities against theft, damage, destruction, acts of vandalism, flood and earthquakes. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect: all policies of insurance of the Rosehill Entities are in full force and effect; the Rosehill Entities are in compliance with the terms of such policies in all material respects; there are no material claims by any of the Rosehill Entities under any such policy or instrument as to which any insurance company is denying liability or defending under a reservation of rights clause; and none of the Rosehill Entities has any reason to believe that it will not be able to renew its existing insurance coverage as and when such coverage expires or to obtain similar coverage from similar insurers as may be necessary to continue its business.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Committee may require Holder to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that Holder is acquiring the Shares for investment purposes and without a view to distribution thereof. The Company may condition the delivery of the RSUs upon the listing, registration or qualification of the Shares upon a securities exchange or under applicable securities laws. The Shares shall be subject to such stock transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under rules, regulations and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which the Stock is then listed and any applicable Federal or state securities law. The Company may cause a legend to be put on each certificate representing Shares to reflect any of the provisions of this Section 6.

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as expressly contemplated hereby, neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder shall be assigned or delegated, in whole or in part, by any Party hereto (whether by operation of Law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other Parties, and any purported assignment or delegation in contravention of this Section 10.6 shall be null and void and of no force and effect; provided , however , that Purchaser may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any of its Affiliates without the prior written consent of the other Parties. Except to the extent provided in ARTICLE 9 and subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure solely to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns and nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to or shall be construed to confer upon any other Person any legal or equitable rights, benefits or remedies of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.

assistant: Assignments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: (J.A. at 179.) The district court reasoned that “[i]f the parents believed that- [FBDS was] denying thei hool Dish 200 v. Illinois State Bd. of Ed., 79 F.3d 654, 656 (7th Cir.1996) (stating that the IDEA’S authorization to courts to grant “appropriate” relief “encompasses the full range of equitable remedies and therefore empowers a court to order adult compensatory education if necessary to cure a violation”); Parents of Student W. v. Puyallup School District, 31 F.3d 1489, 1496 (9th Cir.1994) (same); Pihl v. Massachusetts Dept, of Educ., 9 F.3d 184, 188 (1st Cir.1993) (same); Hall v. Knott County Bd. of Ed., 941 F.2d 402, 407 (6th Cir.1991) (same); Jefferson County Bd. of Educ. v. Breen, 853 F.2d 853, 857-58 (11th Cir.1988) (same); Miener v. Missouri, 800 F.2d 749, 753 (8th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>). Compensatory education involves Options: A. holding that a plaintiff who proves a cause of action under 1981 may recover punitive damages where the plaintiff is entitled to an award of compensatory damages even if nominal B. recognizing appropriateness of compensatory education award and holding that plaintiff was entitled to recover compensatory education if she prevailed in her claim that she was denied a fape for several years C. recognizing appropriateness in some circumstances of award of compensatory education beyond age 21 and remanding for determination of whether it should be awarded D. recognizing that family court cannot eliminate compensatory part of maintenance award E. recognizing appropriateness in some circumstances of award of compensatory education beyond age 21 and re manding for determination of whether it should be awarded

assistant: The best answer is B. recognizing appropriateness of compensatory education award and holding that plaintiff was entitled to recover compensatory education if she prevailed in her claim that she was denied a fape for several years
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall constitute a “Refinancing Amendment” with respect to the Replacement Term A Loans and the Replacement Revolving Credit Commitments established hereunder, an “Incremental Facility Amendment” with respect to the Incremental Term A Facility and Incremental Revolving Facility established hereunder and a “Loan Document” for all purposes of the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents. The provisions of this Agreement are deemed incorporated into the Credit Agreement as if fully set forth therein. To the extent required by the Credit Agreement, each of the Administrative Borrower and the Agent hereby consent to each Replacement Term A Lender and/or Replacement Revolving Lender that is not a Lender as of the date hereof becoming a Lender under the Credit Agreement. On the Amendment No. 2 Closing Date, each Revolving Lender’s Applicable Revolving Credit Percentage of the aggregate amount available to be drawn under any Letter of Credit (in respect of any Letter of Credit issued in any Alternate Currency, expressed in the Dollar Equivalent thereof) shall be re-determined giving effect to the adjustments to the Commitments referred to in this Agreement, and the participations of the Revolving Lenders shall be reallocated to reflect such re-determined amounts.

assistant: Miscellaneous
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Lender, upon execution and delivery of the Existing Credit Agreement or upon executing and delivering an Assignment Agreement, as the case may be, represents and warrants as of the Original Closing Date or as of the applicable Effective Date (as defined in the applicable Assignment Agreement) that (i) it is an Eligible Assignee; (ii) it has experience and expertise in the making of or investing in commitments or loans such as the applicable Revolving Commitments or Revolving Loans, as the case may be; and (iii) it will make or invest in, as the case may be, its Revolving Commitments or Revolving Loans for its own account in the ordinary course of its business and without a view to distribution of such Revolving Commitments or Revolving Loans within the meaning of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or other federal securities laws (it being understood that, subject to the provisions of this Section 9.6 , the disposition of such Revolving Commitments or Revolving Loans or any interests therein shall at all times remain within its exclusive control).

assistant: Representations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: as well. In Z.A.O., the prevailing party prevailed in a contract dispute. Id. at 550. The problem in Z.A.O. was that the prevailing party failed to segregate the amount of attorney’s fees between its tort and contract causes of action. Id. Because the prevailing party was not entitled to recover attorney’s fees on its tort cause of action, the court remanded the attorney’s fees issue. Id. at 550-51. We find that these cases do not support Appellee’s argument. Additionally, we have previously found that a party waives its right to recover attorney’s fees when it fails to put on evidence of attorney’s fees and fails to request the trial court to submit a question on attorney’s fees to the jury. Fuqua v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co., 315 S.W.3d 552, 560 (Tex.App.—Eastland 2010, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). Consequently, we hold that, under Rule 279, Options: A. holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees B. holding award of attorneys fees to party prevailing on contract claim is mandatory under section 38001 if there is proof of the reasonableness of the fees C. holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees D. holding that oncors request for the trial judge rather than the jury to determine the reasonableness of its attorneys fees and the failure to submit the question of attorneys fees to the jury resulted in a waiver of oncors claim for the recovery of attorneys fees E. holding that the court of appeals erred in modifying the judgment to include attorneys fees when the trial courts refusal to grant attorneys fees was not the subject of a point of error

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that oncors request for the trial judge rather than the jury to determine the reasonableness of its attorneys fees and the failure to submit the question of attorneys fees to the jury resulted in a waiver of oncors claim for the recovery of attorneys fees
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: participation of a guardian ad litem, who would promote their best interests pursuant to the standards set out in 19 M.R.S.A. § 752(5) (Supp.1995), even if the guardian ad litem’s recommendation were inconsistent with the children’s own preferences. Miller, 677 A.2d at 69-70. [¶40] Our discussion in Miller does not support Pearson’s claim. First, Miller did not hold that children of divorcing parents have the constitutional right to participate as a party-would. See id. at 70; see also Levy, Maine Family Law § 6.3[6] at 6-34 (8th ed. 2013). Second, even if such a right exists, it is fulfilled by the court’s overarching best interest analysis, in which the children’s preference is one of many factors, none of which is dispositive. See 19-A M.R.S. § 1653(3)(C); Knight, 680 A.2d at 1038 (<HOLDING>); Levy, Maine Family Law § 6.3[2] at 6-12 to Options: A. recognizing policy and ruling that person who failed to file counterclaim when childs paternity was being determined in earlier litigation should not be allowed to bring later suit to establish that he was childs natural father as this would not be in the childs best interests B. holding that a childs preference regarding parental contact is not determinative of the best interest analysis and that a court must assess a childs best interest in light of all statutory factors C. holding that it was error to base a tpr decision solely on the childs best interest D. holding that when information which potentially undermines the best interest of the child as well as the interest sought to be protected by the legitimation statutes and the policy of this state it must first be tested in light of the best interest of the child standard E. recognizing that a trial court must make a finding that the timesharing schedule is in the childs best interests

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a childs preference regarding parental contact is not determinative of the best interest analysis and that a court must assess a childs best interest in light of all statutory factors
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: None of the Company and its Subsidiaries nor, to the knowledge of the Company, any director, officer, agent, employee or Company or its Subsidiary is aware of or has taken or failed to take any action, directly or indirectly, that has violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder (the “ FCPA ”), the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 (“ UKBA ”), or any other applicable anti-corruption laws, including, without limitation, making use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce corruptly in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay or authorization or approval of the payment of any money, or other property, gift, promise to give or authorization of the giving of anything of value, directly or indirectly, to any “foreign official” (as such term is defined in the FCPA) or any foreign political party or official thereof or any candidate for foreign political office in contravention of the FCPA, or to any person, in contravention of the UKBA, or any other applicable anti-corruption laws. The Company, and its Subsidiaries and their respective Affiliates have conducted their businesses in compliance with the FCPA, the UKBA, and all other applicable anti-corruption laws and have instituted and will maintain policies and procedures designed to promote and achieve compliance with such laws and with the representation and warranty contained herein.

assistant: Anti-Corruption Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: a “strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Id. In raising an ineffective assistance claim, the petitioner must first identify the acts or omissions alleged not to be the result of “reasonable professional judgment.” Id. at 690, 104 S.Ct. 2052. Next, the court must determine whether those acts or omissions fall outside of the “wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690, 104 S.Ct. 2052. To prove prejudice, a convicted defendant must affirmatively prove that the alleged attorney errors “actually had an adverse effect on the defen s case. And Petitioner claims his trial counsel did not “know the law surrounding” Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 111, 98 S.Ct. 330, 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). Section 2255 Mot. 7. At the suppression Options: A. holding that once a motor vehicle has been lawfully detained for a traffic violation the police officers may order the driver to get out of the vehicle without violating the fourth amendments proscription of unreasonable searches and seizures B. holding that an officer may order a passenger out of a vehicle during a stop for a traffic infraction C. holding that officer may order driver out of vehicle once lawfully detained for traffic violation D. holding that a police officer may as a matter of course order the driver of a lawfully stopped car to exit his vehicle E. holding that once a vehicle has been lawfully stopped an officer may order the driver out of the vehicle without violating the fourth amendment

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that officer may order driver out of vehicle once lawfully detained for traffic violation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive acknowledges and warrants that, that except as previously discussed (whether orally or in writing) with the Board or internal or external Company counsel, the Executive is not aware of any matters for which the Executive was responsible or which came to the Executive’s attention as an employee of the Company that might give rise to, evidence or support any claim of illegal conduct, regulatory violation, unlawful discrimination, retaliation or other cause of action against the Company.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: CURIAM: Mirza Azamali Baig and his wife, Yas-meen Baig, natives and citizens of Pakistan, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) order denying withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). They argue that they are entitled to relief based on a showing of past persecution and a fear of future persecution on account of their political opinions. To the extent that the Baigs argue that they were entitled to asylum, we do not have jurisdiction to consider the issue because the couple did not submit an application for asylum before either the IJ or the BIA. See Omari v. Holder, 562 F.3d 314, 317 (5th Cir. 2009) (<HOLDING>). We generally have authority to review only Options: A. holding that claims not presented to the ij and bia should be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies B. holding that we lack jurisdiction to review a claim not brought before the bia even when the bia addresses it sua sponte C. holding that we will not review an issue or claim that was not presented to the bia in the petitioners notice of appeal or brief to the bia even if the bia considered the issue or claim sua sponte D. holding that the petitioners failure to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claim before the bia deprived the district court of jurisdiction to hear the issue E. recognizing that failure to exhaust an issue before the bia strips us of jurisdiction

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing that failure to exhaust an issue before the bia strips us of jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Eligible Employee who incurs a Covered Termination or a Change in Control Termination and who satisfies the conditions of Section 4.02 shall be eligible to receive the Severance Benefits described in this Policy, subject however, to the application of the non-duplication provisions of Section 5.06.

assistant: Participations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Committee may modify, extend or renew outstanding Options and authorize the grant of new Options in substitution therefor, provided that any such action may not, without the written consent of a Participant, impair any of such Participant’s rights under any Option previously granted. Any outstanding ISO that is modified, extended, renewed or otherwise altered will be treated in accordance with Section 424(h) of the Code. Except as permitted by Section 18 of the Plan with respect to required stockholder approval, the Committee may reduce the Exercise Price of outstanding Options without the consent of such Participants; provided , however , that the Exercise Price may not be reduced below the Fair Market Value on the date the action is taken to reduce the Exercise Price.

assistant: Modifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement is effective and deliveries under this Agreement will begin on the Effective Date. This Agreement shall remain in effect until December 31, 2050. If either Party desires to terminate this Agreement on December 31, 2050, it shall provide written notice of intent to terminate by January 1, 2045. If notice of termination is not received by either Party prior to January 1, 2045, this Agreement shall remain in effect unless terminated by either Party giving to the other Party not less than five (5) years prior written notice of its intention to terminate. As of the Effective Date, the Former WPC shall be amended and restated in its entirety by this Agreement and the Western Interconnection Wholesale Power Contract.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Executive acknowledges and agrees that within thirty (30) days following the Separation Date, Executive will submit all expense reports (if any) with appropriate documentation, in accordance with UEI policies and procedures, and that when paid, Executive will have received full payment therefore and that there are no, nor will there be any, other expense items due Executive.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you reside outside of the united states of america , canada and mexico ( `` north america '' ) your agreement is with dropbox international unlimited company , and if you reside in north america your agreement is with dropbox , inc. .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except for (i) the continuation of health benefits under state or federal law at Executive’s (or his spouse and dependent’s) expense (for which statutory and eligibility requirements must be met) and (ii) the payment of Wages through the Termination Date, Executive shall not be entitled to receive any payments, benefits or other compensation under this Section 5 (including but not limited to any Annual Bonus or severance pay) unless and until Executive has executed and delivered to the Company a non-revocable waiver and release, in form and substance acceptable to the Company in its sole discretion, of all claims he has, or may have, known or unknown, against the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates and their respective predecessors and successors, and any of the current or former directors, managers, officers, employees, owners, investors, shareholders, partners, members, representatives, or agents of any of the foregoing, which arise out of or relate to his employment, separation therefrom, any agreement between the Parties, the LLC Agreement, the Restricted Unit Award Agreements or any other matter or facts or events occurring through the date of Executive’s signature on such waiver and release.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Loan Party owns, is licensed to use or otherwise has the right to use, all patents, trademarks, trade names, copyrights, technology, know-how and processes used in or necessary for the conduct of its business as currently conducted that are material to the business of the Loan Parties (collectively, “ Intellectual Property ”) and all such patents, trademarks, trade names, copyrights, applications therefor, and domain names identified on Schedule 5.17(b) hereto are duly and properly registered, filed or issued in the appropriate office and jurisdictions for such registrations, filings or issuances. Except as disclosed on Schedule 5.17(b) hereto, to each Loan Party’s respective knowledge, the use of such Intellectual Property by the Loan Parties does not and has not been alleged by any Person to infringe on the rights of any Person. No Loan Party owes any royalties, honoraria or fees to any Person by reason of its use of the Intellectual Property.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 499 F.Supp.2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y.2007) for the proposition that the privilege does not reach "routine operating decisions.” PL’s Mem. for Mot. to Compel at 26, but it is the Mead Data opinion that has precedential value here. 7 . Even the cases the Committee cites indicate that the privilege covers agency deliberations about decisions, as well as the formulation of policy positions. In Taxation with Representation Fund v. IRS, 646 F.2d 666, 677 (D.C.Cir.1981), the Court stated, "the privilege protects documents reflecting advisory opinions, recommendations, and deliberations comprising part of a process by which governmental decisions and policies are formulated ....” See also Paisley v. C.I.A., 712 F.2d 686, 698-99 (D.C.Cir.1983), vacated on other grounds, 724 F.2d 201 (D.C.Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>). 8 . In Waters v. U.S. Capitol Police Bd., 218 Options: A. holding that where an authorized disclosure is voluntarily made to a nonfederal party whether or not that disclosure is denominated confidential the government waives any claim that the information is exempt from disclosure under the deliberative process privilege B. holding that in analyzing whether materials are protected from disclosure under exemption 5 of foia which protects materials covered by the deliberative process privilege a court must first be able to pinpoint an agency decision or policy to which these documents contributed and stating that the decision whether to prosecute an individual is the type of decision protected by the privilege C. holding that emails among prosecutors relating to decision not to prosecute were covered by the deliberative process privilege D. holding that the information is not protected by attorneyclient privilege E. holding that internal emails about how to present an agency decision to the public were covered by the deliberative process privilege

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that in analyzing whether materials are protected from disclosure under exemption 5 of foia which protects materials covered by the deliberative process privilege a court must first be able to pinpoint an agency decision or policy to which these documents contributed and stating that the decision whether to prosecute an individual is the type of decision protected by the privilege
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: As of the Escrow Release Date: (a) the Loan Parties have no Subsidiaries other than those specifically disclosed in Part (a) of Schedule 8.12 , which Schedule sets forth, as of the Escrow Release Date, the legal name, jurisdiction of incorporation or formation and outstanding Equity Interests of each such Restricted Subsidiary, (b) all of the outstanding Equity Interests in such Restricted Subsidiaries have been validly issued, are fully paid and non-assessable, and are owned by a Loan Party (or a Restricted Subsidiary of a Loan Party) in the amounts specified on Part (a) of Schedule 8.12 free and clear of all Liens except for Liens in favor of the Agent under the Financing Agreements and Permitted Liens which do not have priority over the Liens of the Agent. Except as set forth in Schedule 8.12 , as of the Escrow Release Date, there are no outstanding rights to purchase any Equity Interests in any Restricted Subsidiary. As of the Escrow Release Date, the Loan Parties have no equity investments in any other Person other than those specifically disclosed in Schedule 10.2 . The copies of the Organization Documents of each Loan Party and each amendment thereto provided pursuant to Section 4.3 are true and correct copies of each such document, each of which is valid and in full force and effect as of the Escrow Release Date.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The obligations of the parties pursuant to Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17 and 18, as applicable, shall survive the termination of Executive’s employment and any termination of this Agreement.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In reliance on the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this Sixth Amendment, and subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth in Section 4 hereof, the Credit Agreement shall be amended effective as of the Sixth Amendment Effective Date in the manner provided in this Section 2 .

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Assignor, on demand, shall indemnify and hold Assignee harmless for, from, and against any and all loss, cost, damage, claim, liability or expense, including court costs and attorneys' fees in a reasonable amount, arising out of any breach of the terms, provisions and/or conditions of this Assignment by Assignor or its agents. The foregoing indemnification shall include loss, cost, damage, claim, liability or expense from any injury or damage of any kind whatsoever (including death) to persons or property.

assistant: Indemnifications