system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Inc., 752 F.Supp.2d 246 (E.D.N.Y. 2010) (determining that, “although the relative means of [individual] plaintiffs in contrast to a national company clearly favors plaintiffs,” plaintiff failed to demonstrate that travel to the transferee forum would pose a significant burden relative to traveling to the transferor forum). Here, plaintiff is opposing transfer to his home forum and arguing that his means prohibit him from prosecuting his lawsuit there because his attorney would need to travel from New York to New Jersey (or he would need to find another attorney, which he has not been able to do thus far). The Court finds that the additional burden that would be imposed on counsel to travel to the District of New Jersey carries SI), 2002 WL 523568, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2002) (<HOLDING>). The Court concludes that the transfer of this Options: A. holding that the debtorinsured was entitled to exempt the cash surrender value of her life insurance policy naming her dependent son as a beneficiary under illinois statute providing exemption for all proceeds payable because of the death of the insured and the aggregate cash value of any or all life insurance policies payable to a wife or husband of the insured or to a child parent or other person dependent upon the insured B. holding the appellant needed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that her husbands death fell within the terms of the insurance policy C. holding in case where plaintiff sought to recover benefits from an accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy issued to her mother transfer to southern district of california warranted because among other things the transactions giving rise to plaintiffs action have no connection to the northern district and the life insurance policy was purchased by the insured in the southern district she received all medical care there and her death occurred there D. holding that an arbitration award involving the appellants challenge to the failure of the insurance company to ensure that he had read and understood a signed waiver and to attach the waiver to the insurance policy as contrary to public policy is not reviewable by the courts because there is no challenge to a provision or term of the policy the appellant never claimed that the waiver or policy language itself was contrary to the public policy of this commonwealth E. holding in an action to recover premiums paid on a life insurance policy where plaintiff alleged she had been informed she was paying premiums toward a retirement annuity contract that where the record was devoid of any facts suggesting that defendant exercised any wrongful control over the monthly payments voluntarily made by plaintiff or took any action with respect to such payments other than providing her with the life insurance coverage which the documents establish that she purchased there was no basis for a claim of conversion

assistant: The best answer is C. holding in case where plaintiff sought to recover benefits from an accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy issued to her mother transfer to southern district of california warranted because among other things the transactions giving rise to plaintiffs action have no connection to the northern district and the life insurance policy was purchased by the insured in the southern district she received all medical care there and her death occurred there