flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute together but one and the same agreement. This Agreement shall become effective when counterparts hereof executed on behalf of each Borrower, each Agent and each Lender (or notice thereof satisfactory to the Administrative Agent), shall have been received by the Administrative Agent. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Agreement and any other Loan Document by facsimile transmission or by any other electronic imaging means (including “.pdf” files) shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Agreement or such other Loan Document.

assistant: Effectiveness
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower shall not, directly or, to the Borrower’s knowledge, indirectly, use the proceeds of any Credit Extension, or lend, contribute or otherwise make available such proceeds to any Subsidiary, joint venture partner or other individual or entity, to fund any activities of or business with any individual or entity, or in any Designated Jurisdiction, that, at the time of such funding, is the subject of Sanctions, or in any other manner that will result in a violation by any individual or entity (including any individual or entity participating in the transaction, whether as Lender, Arranger, Administrative Agent, Several L/C Agent, Fronting Bank, Swing Line Lender, or otherwise) of Sanctions, other than, in each case, transactions that have received exemptions or authorizations issued by any relevant sanctions authority that permit such transaction thereunder.

assistant: Sanctions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Release, the Change in Control Agreement, the Confidentiality Agreement and the Stock Agreements represent the entire agreement and understanding between the Company and Executive concerning the subject matter of this Release and Executive’s relationship with the Company, and supersede and replace any and all prior agreements and understandings between the Parties concerning the subject matter of this Release and Executive’s relationship with the Company.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Should any part of this Agreement be found to be invalid or in violation of law, such part shall be of no force and effect, and the rest of this Agreement shall survive as valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: If the Participant remains in continuous Service through the Settlement Date, then the Company shall deliver to the Participant, in full satisfaction of the Participant’s rights with respect to the Performance Units, a number of shares of Stock on the Settlement Date equal to the sum of (i) the number of Performance Units for which the Performance Goals have been achieved, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion in accordance with the terms and conditions herein (the “ Vested Units ”), and (ii) the Dividend Equivalent Units credited to the Participant with respect to the Vested Units.

assistant: Vesting
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of the affidavit. Similarly, Crow’s participation as the judge in the plea-and-arraignment hearing is a matter of clear and weighty importance and cannot be considered merely, an administrative responsibility. We have held that a criminal defendant has a right to an arraignment hearing. Hamm v. State, 365 Ark, 647, 232 S.W.3d 463 (2006). Additionally, Crow was required to Ract in his official judicial capacity in presiding over the plea-and-arraignment hearing— not’ in an administrative capacity. See Mississippi Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Atkinson, 645 So.2d 1331 (Miss.1994) (lawyers participation as a judge, was substantial where the judge’s action- in his judicial capacity was required.to perform the action); see also Baldridge v. State, 289 Kan. 618, 215 P.3d 585 (Kan.2009) (<HOLDING>). As a final point, Floyd also argues that the Options: A. holding that admissions purportedly made by an accused by way of his agents or attorneys in pleadings from a civil case are not admissible in a criminal case unless shown to have been authorized by him B. holding that even where a client was more sophisticated in business matters than the lawyer himself the lawyer should have assumed the client was relying on the lawyer for the legal aspects of the loan from the client to the lawyer to the same extent that the client would rely on the lawyer for advice were the client making the loan to a third person C. holding that final judgment in a criminal case means sentence D. holding that for all intents and purposes the instant case is the same action that was brought previously we therefore find the application of the doctrine of the law of the case to be appropriate E. holding that a lawyer was disqualified from representation in a criminal case when he had previously authorized the issuance of subpoenas for evidence used in the case

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that a lawyer was disqualified from representation in a criminal case when he had previously authorized the issuance of subpoenas for evidence used in the case
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: plan that will result from his post-divorce employment or contributions of his separate property. Thus, the trial court’s division of Randall’s 401(k) plan was not an abuse of discretion. We overrule point eight. C. Stock Options In his ninth point, Randall complains that the trial court improperly characterized his stock options as 100% community property when they were actually partly his separate property. At divorce, the trial court is charged with determining the rights of both spouses in employee stock option plans and stock options. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 7.003 (Vernon 1998). The divorce decree awards Ginger: One-half (50%) of the “fair value” options to purchase shares in Onex Food Services, Inc. held in the name of Randall C. Boyd subject to Tex.App.-Amarillo 1988, no writ) (<HOLDING>). Because Randall’s fair value stock options Options: A. holding that employee spousess interest in his companys profit sharing stock plan awarded for work done outside of marriage was spouses separate property B. holding that money invested in voluntary investment plan during marriage was marital property because it was property acquired during marriage C. holding that stock options that could be purchased but not sold without company consent during marriage were community property even though value of options was dependent upon employee spouses postdivorce employment D. holding that stock plan to which employer and employee spouse both made contributions and whose value was dependent on length of employee spouses employment was a deferred compensation retirement plan E. holding that whether a spouses employment termination benefit is separate or marital property is determined by whether the right to payment accrued during marriage

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that employee spousess interest in his companys profit sharing stock plan awarded for work done outside of marriage was spouses separate property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: 3. Recipient shall not, and shall cause its Representatives not to, (b) use or permit any Confidential Information to be accessed or used for any purpose other than for the evaluation of the Purpose. The disclosure or receipt of information pursuant hereto in no way obligates either Party to agree to any business transaction, whether or not relating to the Purpose. 10. Neither Party may assign, transfer or sell any of its rights under this Agreement, or delegate any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: circumstances that supported reasonable suspicion, the trial court also considered the fact that the driver of the Jeep slumped down as the officer drove by. Again, this behavior understandably raised concerns in the officer’s mind about the driver and, because the vehicle was parked illegally, justified the officer’s inquiry of the driver. However, nothing in the behavior that the officer observed — the driver’s activity — connected with anything the officer subsequently observed about Sandoz to suggest that Sandoz engaged in criminal activity. ¶29 The trial court also cited the fact that Sandoz was visiting the apartment of a suspected drug dealer late at night in a high-crime area. However, without more, this fact does not justify a Terry stop. See Doughty, 170 Wn.2d at 62-63, 60 (<HOLDING>). Other facts must exist to suggest criminal Options: A. holding that defendant staying in abandoned house had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the house despite having a key to the house and the ability to let people in and out of it B. holding noknock entry justified where officers had reasonable suspicion that entering drug stash house would be dangerous and drug dealer frequenting house could not be found elsewhere C. holding magistrate could infer that evidence of drugs or paraphernalia would be located in experienced drug dealers home D. holding police may not seize a person who visits a suspected drug house late at night and who stays for only two minutes based only on neighbors complaints of shortstay traffic and where there is no actual evidence of drugs controlled buys reports of known drug users or dealers frequenting the house and so forth E. holding that reasonable suspicion justified a terry stop of the defendant when she was walking and talking with known drug dealers who were known to be at the scene to buy and sell cocaine

assistant: The best answer is D. holding police may not seize a person who visits a suspected drug house late at night and who stays for only two minutes based only on neighbors complaints of shortstay traffic and where there is no actual evidence of drugs controlled buys reports of known drug users or dealers frequenting the house and so forth
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The execution, delivery and performance by such Investor of this Agreement and the consummation by such Investor of the transactions contemplated hereby will not (i) result in a violation of the organizational documents of such Investor or (ii) conflict with, or constitute a default (or an event which with notice or lapse of time or both would become a default) under, or give to others any rights of termination, amendment, acceleration or cancellation of, any agreement, indenture or instrument to which such Investor is a party, or (iii) result in a violation of any law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or decree (including federal and state securities laws) applicable to such Investor, except in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii) above, for such that are not material and do not otherwise affect the ability of such Investor to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: for Plaintiffs to suggest that the United States Constitution requires Defendant to sustain a city-wide fireworks disaster before its health and safety concerns become legitimate. 5 . Most equal protection claims arising from challenges to fireworks ordinances involve laws governing the issuance of permits to sell fireworks. In these cases, plaintiffs often argue that city defendants have discriminated against certain fireworks distributors in the approval of fireworks permits. Unlike the case at bar, these examples may raise legitimate equal protection issues. But even in situations that indeed require more in-depth equal protection analysis, courts have typically refrained from rejecting an ordinance as ■ violating equal protection guarantees. See, e.g., Haddenham, 339 N.W.2d at 792 (<HOLDING>). This includes the Fifth Circuit, which, in Options: A. holding as permissible under the equal protection clause a law prohibiting nonresident sellers of fireworks from selling fireworks to nonresident purchasers during a limited period of time without first verifying that each purchaser is a licensed fireworks wholesaler manufacturer or permit holder B. holding that the state law violated equal protection principles C. holding that the seizure of fireworks pursuant to a state fireworks law did not violate the plaintiffs property rights under the due process clause of the united states constitution D. holding that lprs are entitled to the protection of the equal protection clause E. holding that a colorado amendment prohibiting legislative judicial or executive action designed to protect gays and lesbians from discrimination violated the equal protection clause

assistant: The best answer is A. holding as permissible under the equal protection clause a law prohibiting nonresident sellers of fireworks from selling fireworks to nonresident purchasers during a limited period of time without first verifying that each purchaser is a licensed fireworks wholesaler manufacturer or permit holder
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: In case any one or more of the provisions or parts of a provision contained in this Agreement shall , for any reason, be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision or part of a provision of this Agreement ; and this Agreement shall , to the fullest extent lawful , be reformed and construed as if such invalid or illegal or unenforceable provision , or part of a provision, had never been contained herein, and such provision or part reformed so that it would be valid, legal and enforceable to the maximum extent possible . Without limiting the foregoing , if any provision (or part of provision) contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be excessively broad as to duration, geographical scope, activity or subject , it shall be construed by limiting and reducing it , so as to be enforceable to the fullest extent compatible with then existing applicable law .

assistant: Severability
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Inc., 966 F.Supp. 416 (S.D.N.Y.1997) is therefore misplaced, because that case imposed a contempt sanction for the violation of the court’s injunctive order to make payments into an escrow account. Ecopetrol also contends that the Judgment is not a money judgment because it contains personal commands for performance of an act within a specified time period. Although it is true that a personal command may usually be enforced by contempt, a personal command to render payments may nevertheless fall within the meaning of a “money judgment” under Rule 69. See, e.g., Indus. Prof'l & Tech. Workers Int’l Union, SIUNA, AFL-CIO v. Worldtec Grp. Int’l, 25 Fed.Appx. 527, 529 (9th Cir.2001) (unpublished); Jou v. Adalian, No. CIV. 09-00226(JMS), 2015 WL 477268, at *5 (D.Haw. Feb. 5, 2015) (<HOLDING>). ' In cases where contempt is appropriately Options: A. holding that an administrative agency is not subject to a contempt proceeding for failure to comply with an order B. holding that rule 63 applies to pleadings filed within seven days of summary judgment proceedings C. recognizing a courts inherent authority to initiate a criminal contempt proceeding for disobedience of its order D. holding that a difference between 384 days prepreference average number of days to payment and 547 days preference average number of days to payment did not make the payments out of the ordinary course of business E. holding contempt proceeding inappropriate to enforce the trial courts order requiring payment of a sum certain within seven days

assistant: The best answer is E. holding contempt proceeding inappropriate to enforce the trial courts order requiring payment of a sum certain within seven days
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Series D Warrant shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with, and all questions concerning the construction, validity, interpretation and performance of this Series D Warrant shall be governed by, the internal laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of New York or any other jurisdictions) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdictions other than the State of New York. The Company hereby irrevocably waives personal service of process and consents to process being served in any such suit, action or proceeding by mailing a copy thereof to the Company at the address set forth in Section 9(f) of the Securities Purchase Agreement and agrees that such service shall constitute good and sufficient service of process and notice thereof. The Company hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts sitting in The City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, for the adjudication of any dispute hereunder or in connection herewith or with any transaction contemplated hereby or discussed herein, and hereby irrevocably waives, and agrees not to assert in any suit, action or proceeding, any claim that it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of any such court, that such suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum or that the venue of such suit, action or proceeding is improper. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to limit in any way any right to serve process in any manner permitted by law. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or operate to preclude the Holder from bringing suit or taking other legal action against the Company in any other jurisdiction to collect on the Company’s obligations to the Holder, to realize on any collateral or any other security for such obligations, or to enforce a judgment or other court ruling in favor of the Holder. THE COMPANY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO, AND AGREES NOT TO REQUEST, A JURY TRIAL FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF ANY DISPUTE HEREUNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH OR ARISING OUT OF THIS SERIES D WARRANT OR ANY TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: if you have reason to believe that your copyright is being infringed by any content on the skyscanner services and/or skyscanner platforms , please send a written notification of such infringement to the address stated at the beginning of terms marked for the attention of our ` general counsel ' .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: None of the Borrower or any Subsidiary will sell, lease, license or otherwise transfer any assets to, or purchase, lease, license or otherwise acquire any assets from, or otherwise engage in any other transactions with, any of its Affiliates, except (a) transactions in the ordinary course of business that are at prices and on terms and conditions not less favorable to the Borrower or such Subsidiary than those that would prevail in arm’s-length transactions with unrelated third parties, (b) transactions between or among the Loan Parties not involving any other Affiliate, (c) transactions between or among Subsidiaries that are not Loan Parties, (d) any Restricted Payment permitted under Section 6.08, (e) issuances by the Borrower of Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Equity Interests), and receipt by the Borrower of capital contributions, (f) compensation and indemnification of, and other employment and severance arrangements with, directors, officers and employees of the Borrower or any Subsidiary and (g) loans and advances permitted under Section 6.04(j) and 6.04(k).

assistant: Transactions With Affiliates
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any amendment to the Plan shall be deemed to be an amendment to this Agreement to the extent that the amendment is applicable hereto; provided , however , that no amendment shall adversely affect the rights of the Optionee with respect to the Option without the Optionee’s consent.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the Company at its headquarters in [Eugene, Oregon] to the attention of the Secretary, and to the Executive at the address last reflected on the Company’s payroll records, or such other address as either party may hereafter designate in writing to the other. Any such notice shall be delivered in person or shall be enclosed in a properly sealed envelope addressed as provided herein, registered or certified, and deposited (postage and registry or certification fee prepaid) in a post office or branch post office regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service. Any such notice shall be deemed given only when received, but if Executive is no longer employed by the Company or a subsidiary, such notice shall be deemed to have been duly given five (5) business days after the date it is mailed in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Section.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: failed to act in a reasonably prudent manner to protect and enforce rights, and when a perceived injustice to the defendant exists. See, e.g., AC. Aukerman Co. v. R.L. Chaides Constr. Co., 960 F.2d 1020 (Fed.Cir.1992) (en bane) (patent infringement claim may be barred under the doctrine of laches). Does the fact that the right sought to be enforced has its origin in the Constitution, rather than in a statutory grant, mean that there should be no limits imposed on its enforcement, either by legislature or courts? Plaintiffs so argue. They begin by drawing a distinction between what they call “common-law takings” and “eminent-domain takings.” Common-law takings, according to plaintiffs, include takings that arise from torts (non-contract wrongs) and contract wrongs 3d 1171 (Fed.Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); Florida Rock Indtis., Inc. v. United States, Options: A. holding that denial of permit under section 404 of the clean water act was a taking B. holding that the limitation act does not apply to claims brought under the clean water act C. holding that adequate notice is a mandatory precondition of a clean water act citizen suit D. holding that district courts are without jurisdiction to review preenforcement orders issued under the clean water act E. holding that clean water acts notice provision is a condition precedent to all claims

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that denial of permit under section 404 of the clean water act was a taking
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a) The Borrower will comply in all material respects with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and requirements of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, Environmental Laws, all zoning and building codes and ERISA and the rules and regulations thereunder) except where the necessity of compliance therewith is contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings. The Borrower will maintain in effect policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions.

assistant: Compliance With Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company will withhold from the number of shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable hereunder (including with respect to dividend equivalents) a number of shares necessary to satisfy any and all applicable federal, state, local and foreign tax withholding obligations and employment-related tax requirements (“Tax-Related Items”). In addition, the Company (or your employer, if different) will withhold from your compensation any and all applicable Tax-Related Items in the event all or a portion of the Performance Shares are treated as taxable prior to or other than on the vesting date set forth in paragraph 2 above and the number of shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable (if any) is insufficient to satisfy such Tax-Related Items withholding obligations. Finally, you shall pay to the Company (or your employer, if different) any amount of Tax-Related Items that the Company or your employer may be required to withhold or account for as a result of your participation in the Plan that cannot be satisfied by the means previously described. The Company may refuse to issue or deliver the shares of Common Stock if you fail to comply with your obligations in connection with the Tax-Related Items.

assistant: Tax Withholdings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and any claim, controversy or dispute arising under or related to or in connection with the Agreement, the relationship of the parties, and/or the interpretation and enforcement of the rights and duties of the parties will be governed by the laws of the State of New York (without regard to conflicts of laws principles other than sections 5-1401 and 5-1402 of the New York general obligations law), except to the extent preempted by federal law.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted under the laws of the State of California, USA, except that questions affecting the construction and effect of any patent within the Licensed Patents under the Exclusive Agreement shall be determined by the applicable law of the country or jurisdiction in which the patent has been granted.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: accord Moore v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 376 Md. 558, 831 A.2d 12, 16-17 (2003). The question is “whether the allegations in a new suit, ‘if proven to be true, would negate, contradict, and in that sense nullify an essential foundation for the earlier ... judgment.’ ” Sheahy, 284 F.Supp.2d at 282-83 (quoting Green, 828 A.2d at 830). This test is narrower than the transaction test. See Moore, 831 A.2d at 16 (quoting Restatement § 22(2)(B) cmt. F). Generally, the subsequent action will only be precluded if “the prior action had eventuated in a judgment for plaintiff since only in such a case would there be the threat of nullification of the judgment or impairment of rights[.]” Sheahy, 284 F.Supp.2d at 282 (quoting Restatement § 22(2)(B) cmt. F); see also Moore, 831 A.2d at 17 (<HOLDING>). Examples of subsequent judgments “nullifying” Options: A. holding a suit against an agency of the state is a suit against the state B. holding that a lawsuit against a corporation that purchased assets from a bankrupt is not a claim against the debtor C. holding that debtor was not prevented from raising a claim based facts that had served as a successful defense against creditors previous suit to recover the debt D. holding that under florida law for the purposes of collateral estoppel an attorney is in privity with his or her client in a previous suit when the opposing party in that action brings a subsequent suit against the attorney based in the same facts E. holding that a creditors security was preserved notwithstanding the bankruptcy of the debtor

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that debtor was not prevented from raising a claim based facts that had served as a successful defense against creditors previous suit to recover the debt
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: on November 19, 2003, the District Court entered a final order of forfeiture. Jackman appealed, and this Court dismissed the appeal as frivolous. See C.A. No. 03-4607. On March 24, 2006, Jackman filed the instant Rule 41(g) motion. On March 27, 2006, the District Court denied the motion. Jackman filed a timely notice of appeal, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the District Court’s decision for abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d Cir.1999). Because the firearms have been forfeited to the government and be cause Jackman is legally prohibited from possessing firearms, the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Jack-man’s motion with respect to the firearms. See United States v. Howell, 425 F.3d 971 (11th Cir.2005)(<HOLDING>); United States v. Felici, 208 F.3d 667, 670 Options: A. holding that a convicted felon is not entitled to have firearms returned held in trust or sold for his profit B. holding that defendant was not entitled to partially suspended sentence as a previously convicted felon C. holding that a convicted felon may sue a municipal government to recover the value of seized firearms that he owned D. holding the defendant was a convicted felon within the purview of the federal statute prohibiting the receiving and possession of firearms by a convicted felon where the defendants prior conviction was based on an idaho state probated sentence E. holding that a convicted felon is not entitled to return of firearms or to have firearms held in trust by third party

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that a convicted felon is not entitled to have firearms returned held in trust or sold for his profit
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower shall execute and deliver to Agent and the Revolving Credit Lenders such additional documents (including, without limitation, amendments to the Security Documents), instruments, certifications and opinions as the Agent may reasonably require, including, without limitation, a Compliance Certificate, demonstrating compliance with all covenants set forth in the Loan Documents after giving effect to the increase, and the Borrower shall pay the cost of any mortgagee’s title insurance policy or any endorsement or update thereto or any updated UCC searches, all recording costs and fees, and any and all intangible taxes or other documentary or mortgage taxes, assessments or charges or any similar reasonable fees, taxes or expenses which are reasonably requested in connection with such increase.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to the agency’s interview policy as well. And if it is the policy that is the cause of Schnitzler’s inability to renounce his citizenship, then a judicial determination that the policy is unconstitutional can redress his injury. Accordingly, standing is not a barrier to Schnitzler’s ability to pursue his constitutional claims. IV For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the dismissal of Schnitzler’s complaint and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. So ordered. 1 . But see Turner v. Beers, No. 13-504, 5 F.Supp.3d 115, 119, 2013 WL 6627983, at *3 (D.D.C. Dec. 17, 2013) (noting that ‘‘[t]he Government does not contest that we are ‘in a state of war,' which is a prerequisite for [§ 1481(a)(6)] to be operative”); Kaufman v. Holder, 686 F.Supp.2d 40, 43-44 (D.D.C.2010) (<HOLDING>). 2 . See also App. 17 (stating that "[t]he Options: A. holding that six employees bringing suit under title vii were not in privity with the united states which had brought a previous suit against the same employer because the employees sought a type of relief which the united states had not sought B. holding that the united states was at war for purposes of 1481a6 in 2008 when another prisoner sought acknowledgment of his renunciation C. holding that prosecution of defendant in the united states for hostage taking based on acts committed outside the united states did not violate due process D. holding that sovereign immunity does not bar extinguishment of united states junior lien in proceeding in which united states was not a party E. holding that the fourteenth amendment which makes persons bom in the united states and subject to its jurisdiction citizens of the united states and requires that representatives be apportioned among the states based on population excluding indians not taxed did not make an indian a citizen of the united states

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the united states was at war for purposes of 1481a6 in 2008 when another prisoner sought acknowledgment of his renunciation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE OR DEFEND ANY RIGHTS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT AND ANY AMENDMENT, INSTRUMENT, DOCUMENT OR AGREEMENT DELIVERED OR WHICH MAY IN THE FUTURE BE DELIVERED IN CONNECTION HEREWITH OR THEREWITH OR ARISING FROM ANY BANKING RELATIONSHIP EXISTING IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OF THE FOREGOING, AND AGREES THAT ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE TRIED BEFORE A COURT AND NOT BEFORE A JURY. EACH LOAN PARTY THAT IS A PARTY HERETO ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT IT HAS RECEIVED FULL AND SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION FOR THIS PROVISION (AND EACH OTHER PROVISION OF EACH OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT TO WHICH IT A PARTY) AND THAT THIS PROVISION IS A MATERIAL INDUCEMENT FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND THE LENDERS ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT AND EACH SUCH OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Prior Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as provided herein. This Agreement contains all the understandings between the parties pertaining to the matters referred to herein, and supersedes any other undertakings and agreements, whether oral or written, previously entered into by them with respect thereto. The Executive represents that, in executing this Agreement, the Executive does not rely and has not relied upon any representation or statement not set forth herein made by the Company with regard to the subject matter or effect of this Agreement or otherwise and that Executive has had the opportunity to be represented by counsel of the Executive’s choosing.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Section 3.12 of the Disclosure Letter and Section 3.12 of the Disclosure Letter Supplement sets forth, as of the Effective Date and the Amendment No. 2 Effective Date, respectively, the name, type of organization and jurisdiction of organization of, and the percentage of each class of Equity Interests owned by Parent or any Subsidiary in, (a) each Subsidiary and (b) each joint venture in which Parent or any Subsidiary owns any Equity Interests, and identifies each Designated Subsidiary. All the issued and outstanding Equity Interests in each Subsidiary owned by any Loan Party have been (to the extent such concepts are relevant with respect to such Equity Interests) duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable (except as such rights may arise under mandatory provisions of applicable statutory law that may not be waived and not as a result of any rights contained in organizational documents). Except as set forth in Section 3.12 of the Disclosure Letter and Section 3.12 of the Disclosure Letter Supplement, as of the Effective Date and the Amendment No. 2 Effective Date, respectively, there is no existing option, warrant, call, right, commitment or other agreement to which Parent or any Subsidiary is a party requiring, and there are no Equity Interests in any Subsidiary outstanding that upon exercise, conversion or exchange would require, the issuance by any Subsidiary of any additional Equity Interests or other securities exercisable for, convertible into, exchangeable for or evidencing the right to subscribe for or purchase any Equity Interests in any Subsidiary.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of (i) Ramaco and its successors and assigns, and (ii) Participant and his or her heirs, devisees, executors, administrators and personal representatives.

assistant: Binding Effects
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents to which it is a party, the issuance and sale of the Securities and the consummation by it of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby do not and will not: (i) conflict with or violate any provision of the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s certificate or articles of incorporation, bylaws or other organizational or charter documents, (ii) conflict with, or constitute a default (or an event that with notice or lapse of time or both would become a default) under, result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the properties or assets of the Company or any Subsidiary, or give to others any rights of termination, amendment, acceleration or cancellation (with or without notice, lapse of time or both) of, any agreement, credit facility, debt or other instrument (evidencing a Company or Subsidiary debt or otherwise) or other understanding to which the Company or any Subsidiary is a party or by which any property or asset of the Company or any Subsidiary is bound or affected, or (iii) subject to the Required Approvals, conflict with or result in a violation of any law, rule, regulation, order, judgment, injunction, decree or other restriction of any court or other Governmental Entity to which the Company or a Subsidiary is subject (including federal and state securities laws and regulations), or by which any property or asset of the Company or a Subsidiary is bound or affected; except in the case of each of clauses (ii) and (iii), such as could not have or reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: No Conflicts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The proceeds of the Loans may be used solely (a) to pay fees and expenses on the Closing Date, (b) to refinance existing Indebtedness, (c) to fund future acquisitions permitted by Section 4.14 and (d) for working capital, capital expenditures and other lawful corporate purposes of the Borrower.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Cruz, the case presently before this court does not involve a substantive criminal conviction which requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Rather, this case involves a violation of probation which need only be proven by the' preponderance, or greater weight, of the evidence. See, e.g., Humbert v. State, 933 So.2d 726, 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). We hold, however, that, even under this lesser burden of proof, the evidence at the YOP hearing was insufficient to establish appellant’s dominion and control of the marijuana. Nothing in the evidence before the trial court tied the marijuana to appellant as opposed to the passenger. Indeed, the evidence did not establish that the pick-up truck was owned or even regularly driven or used by appellant. Cf. Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250 (Fla.1983) (<HOLDING>). Because the State’s proof in this case relies Options: A. holding that when drugs are hidden knowledge of their presence generally cannot be inferred solely from defendants control over the vehicle B. holding that where drugs are found in the presence and plain view of the owner or resident occupant of a home dominion and control maybe inferred C. holding that proof of the discovery of illegal drugs in plain view in the presence or two or more joint occupants of the premises is sufficient to support a conviction for constructive possession D. holding that circumstantial evidence of guilt emanating from the defendants proximity to illicit drugs in plain view was equally susceptible to the reasonable hypotheses that the defendant was a mere visitor and that the drugs were in the possession and control of the owner or other occupant of the premises E. holding that the defendants dominion control and knowledge may be inferred if he had exclusive possession of the premises on which the object was found emphasis added

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that where drugs are found in the presence and plain view of the owner or resident occupant of a home dominion and control maybe inferred
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of the Parties, on behalf of itself and its respective Subsidiaries, officers, directors, employees, Representatives, agents, attorneys, auditors, and advisors, agree that it will not, and will not authorize, induce or encourage, any other person to, make any statements or representations, or otherwise communicate, directly or indirectly, in writing, orally, or otherwise, or take any action which may, directly or indirectly, defame or disparage any Party, its Subsidiaries, officers, directors, employees, Representatives, agents, attorneys, auditors, advisors, businesses, or reputations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall preclude a Party from making truthful disclosures that are required by applicable law, regulation, or legal process. The restrictions set forth in this Section 3 shall apply for a period of two (2) years from and after the date hereof.

assistant: Non-Disparagement