flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: omitted). “Unless contrary intent appears,” however, “all statutes, without exception, [should] be construed to apply within the United States .only.” United States v. Delgado-Garcia, 374 F.3d 1337, 1344 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty., — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 2090, 2100, 195 L.Ed.2d 476 (2016) (“Absent clearly expressed congressional intent to the contrary, federal laws will be construed to have only domestic application.”); Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. 108, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 1664, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013) (explaining that the presumption against extraterritorial application provides that ‘“[w]hen a statute has no clear indication of an extraterritorial application, it has none’ ” (quotin 01 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Emmanuel, Crim. No. Options: A. holding that 924c applies extraterritorially where the predicate acts include crimes on the high seas B. holding that 924c applies extraterritorially where the underlying substantive criminal statutes apply extraterritorially C. holding that 924c applies extraterritorially because the predicate crime of violence violation of the torture act is one that may be prosecuted in a court of the united states D. holding that 924c applies extraterritorially in a bombing plot where the charges were predicated on 18 usc 844i which the court held to apply extraterritorially E. holding that 924c applied to bombings of united states embassies in east africa because the predicate charges under 18 usc 844f1 3 apply extraterritorially

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that 924c applied to bombings of united states embassies in east africa because the predicate charges under 18 usc 844f1 3 apply extraterritorially
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company shall on the fourth Trading Day immediately following the Closing Date file a Current Report on Form 8-K or sooner in the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 (the “Form 10-Q”), including the Transaction Documents as exhibits thereto, with the SEC within the time required by the Exchange Act. From and after the filing of the Form 8-K or the Form 10-Q as the case may be as provided in the preceeding sentence, the Company represents to the Purchasers that it shall have publicly disclosed all material, non-public information delivered to any of the Purchasers by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents. In addition, effective upon the issuance of such Form 8-K or the Form 10-Q as the case may be, the Company acknowledges and agrees that any and all confidentiality or similar obligations under any agreement, whether written or oral, between the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective officers, directors, agents, employees or Affiliates on the one hand, and any of the Purchasers or any of their Affiliates on the other hand, shall terminate. The Company and each Purchaser shall consult with each other in issuing any press releases with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby, and neither the Company nor any Purchaser shall issue any such press release nor otherwise make any such public statement without the prior consent of the Company, with respect to any press release of any Purchaser, or without the prior consent of each Purchaser, with respect to any press release of the Company, which consent shall not unreasonably be withheld or delayed, except if such disclosure is required by law, in which case the disclosing party shall promptly provide the other party with prior notice of such public statement or communication. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall not publicly disclose the name of any Purchaser, or include the name of any Purchaser in any filing with the SEC or any regulatory agency or Trading Market, without the prior written consent of such Purchaser, except (a) as required by federal securities law in connection with the filing of final Transaction Documents with the SEC and (b) to the extent such disclosure is required by law or Trading Market regulations, in which case the Company shall provide the Purchasers with prior notice of such disclosure permitted under this clause (b).

assistant: Publicity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: would seem to be an outstanding liability of CCI that would affect its net worth and, therefore, Jeff's total net worth as a CCI shareholder. 7 . We are cognizant that our refusal to consider this issue now could lead to more litigation in the future, given the litigiousness of these parties, but this does not permit us to ignore jurisdictional rules. See In re Guardianship of Hickman, 811 N.E.2d 843, 850 (Ind.Ct.App.2004), trans. denied. We further note that even if the trial court revisits the question of modifying Jeff's child support obligation upon termination of this appeal, such modification could only be made effective upon the date the trial court reobtains jurisdiction following certification of this appeal as final. See Harris v. Harris, 800 N.E.2d 930, 937 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (<HOLDING>), trans. denied. 8 . Despite the Crider Options: A. holding trial court was permitted to rule on child support modification request filed before appeal was certified as final but that effective date of modification could be no earlier than when indiana supreme court denied transfer on appeal and trial court reobtained jurisdiction B. holding that a conviction is deemed final on the date of sentencing when there is no evidence that notice of appeal was filed C. holding that since district court of appeal properly found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on a 3850 motion during the pendency of a direct appeal the district court of appeal should have vacated the order rather than affirming on the merits D. holding that where the issue of sanctions was not before the court of appeals when the appeal was filed the district court retained jurisdiction E. holding that a deposition that was not presented to the trial court could not be considered on appeal

assistant: The best answer is A. holding trial court was permitted to rule on child support modification request filed before appeal was certified as final but that effective date of modification could be no earlier than when indiana supreme court denied transfer on appeal and trial court reobtained jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 380 U.S. 449 85 S.Ct. 1101 14 L.Ed.2d 151 Lester G. McKINNIE et al., petitioners,v.STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 148.—. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1964. April 5, 1965 James M. Nabrit, III, New York City, for petitioners. Thomas E. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee. PER CURIAM. 1 The judgment is reversed. Hamm v. City of Rock Hill and Lupper v. Arkansas, 379 U.S. 306, 85 S.Ct. 384, 13 L.Ed.2d 300. 2 Mr. Justice STEWART would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Tennessee for reconsideration in the light of supervening federal legislation, in accordance with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U.S. 306, 326, 85 S.Ct. 384, 396. 3 Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice HARLAN, and Mr. Justice WHITE would affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U.S. 306, 318, 322 327, 85 S.Ct. 384, 392, 394, 397.

assistant: 2
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company may terminate this Agreement at any time by written notice to the Investor, except during any Valuation Period. In addition, this Agreement shall automatically terminate on the earlier of (i) the end of the Commitment Period; (ii) the date that the Company sells and the Investor purchases the Maximum Commitment Amount; or (iii) the date in which the Registration Statement is no longer effective, or (iv) the date that, pursuant to or within the meaning of any Bankruptcy Law, the Company commences a voluntary case or any Person commences a proceeding against the Company, a Custodian is appointed for the Company or for all or substantially all of its property or the Company makes a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors; provided , however , that the provisions of Articles III, IV, V, VI, IX and the agreements and covenants of the Company and the Investor set forth in Article X shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Committee saying: To stress the seriousness of a motion for sanctions and to define precisely the conduct claimed to violate the rule, the revision provides that the “safe harbor” period, begins to run only upon service of the motion. In most cases, however, counsel should be expected to give informal notice to the other party, whether in person or by a telephone call or letter, of a potential violation before proceeding to prepare and serve a Rule 11 motion. Id. at 710. The court concluded, “It would therefore wrench both the language and purpose of the amendment to the Rule to permit an informal warning to substitute for service of a motion.” Id.; see also McKenzie v. Berggren, 212 F.R.D. 512 (E.D. Michigan, 2003); but see Nisenbaum v. Milwaukee Co., 333 F.3d 804 (7th Cir. 2003) (<HOLDING>). The policy reasons behind requiring service Options: A. holding that a contractor who had substantially complied with the building specifications substantially performed B. holding that rule 11 applied to a letter sent with the intent to influence the court with respect to injunctive relief C. holding defendants were entitled to a decision on the merits on rule 11 sanctions where they substantially complied with rule 11c1a by sending a letter rather than serving a motion D. holding that a warning letter substantially complied with rule 11 by alerting nisenbaum to the problem and giving him more than twentyone days to desist E. holding that insured substantially complied with the manner of changing the beneficiary as required by the policy

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that a warning letter substantially complied with rule 11 by alerting nisenbaum to the problem and giving him more than twentyone days to desist
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following U.S. Supreme Court case excerpt and classify it into the correct legal issue area. Excerpt: 344 U.S. 630 73 S.Ct. 459 97 L.Ed. 622 UNITED STATESv.LANE MOTOR CO. No. 499. Decided Feb. 9, 1953. Mr. Walter J. Cummings, Jr., Solicitor General of the United States, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Paul Harkey, Idabel, Okl., for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 In this proceeding, the Government sought the forfeiture of an automobile and of a truck under the provisions of § 3116 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3116, in the District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. That Section allows the seizure and forfeiture of property 'intended for use in violating' the alcohol tax laws, as well as property 'which has been so used'. The respondent, alleging an interest in the two vehicles, contested the forfeitures. 2 The district judge found the facts to be that the truck and automobile had each been used by the operator of an illegal distillery to drive a number of miles from his home and then parked at a point one-half mile or more from the distillery, the operator walking the rest of the way. The district judge found that the Government had not shown, as it had been alleged, that the vehicles had been used for transporting materials or utensils for use at the distillery, and ruled that the facts shown did not justify a forfeiture. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed, 199 F.2d 495. 3 The Government has petitioned for a writ of certiorari showing that, while the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. One 1948 Plymouth Sedan, 1952, 198 F.2d 399, held in accord with the Tenth Circuit, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has taken a contrary view, United States v. One 1950 Ford Half-Ton Pickup Automobile Truck, 1952, 195 F.2d 857. Certiorari is granted in order to resolve this conflict. 4 We think it clear that a vehicle used solely for commuting to an illegal distillery is not used in violating the revenue laws. 5 Certiorari granted, and the judgment affirmed.

assistant: 1
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: NCAA is a recipient of federal funds because it is an entity which receives federal financial assistance through another recipient and operates an educational program or activity which receives or benefits from such assistance.” App. at 98. This allegation plainly alleges that the NCAA receives dues from member institutions, which receive federal funds. As discussed above, this allegation would be sufficient to bring the NCAA within the scope of Title IX as a recipient of federal funds and would survive a motion to dismiss. If a district court concludes that an amendment is futile based upon its erroneous view of the law, it abuses its discretion in denying a plaintiff leave to amend to include a legally sufficient allegation. See Centifanti v. Nix, 865 F.2d 1422, 1431 (3d Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). Thus, if the district court denied Smith Options: A. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to amend complaint because the proposed amendment would have been futile B. holding that district court had not abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend complaint C. holding that the district court which erred in its conclusion that there was jurisdictional defect abused its discretion in denying a plaintiffsmotion for leave to amend his complaint because the proposed amendment would not cure the jurisdictional defect D. holding that the district court abused its discretion in denying leave to amend after a delay of eight months E. holding that a violation of the forum defendant rule is a jurisdictional defect

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the district court which erred in its conclusion that there was jurisdictional defect abused its discretion in denying a plaintiffsmotion for leave to amend his complaint because the proposed amendment would not cure the jurisdictional defect
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: appeal, and was not intended to apply later in the course of the proceeding. Chandler, 145 F.3d at 1358-59. This reasoning is consistent with the holding in eases where courts have decided whether appellate fees may be assessed for appeals pending on the effective date of the PLRA. For example, in Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir.1996), the court held that it could not dismiss two remaining appeals as ftivolous because appellant had used up his allotted “three strikes” during the pendency of those appeals. The court concluded that “[s]ection 1915(g) governs bringing new actions or filing new appeals — the events that trigger an obligation to pay a docket fee — rather than the disposition of existing cases.” See also Thurman v. Gramley, 97 F.3d 185, 188 (7th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>), Lucien v. Jockisch, 133 F.3d 464, 467 (7th Options: A. holding that the dispositive events for purposes of the new fee obligations under 1915b1 are the bringing of a civil action and the filing of an appeal once these milestones have passed fees do not attach to later activities B. holding that the filing of an opening brief within the time period for filing a notice of appeal could constitute notice of appeal C. holding that attorneys fees for the preparation of the fee application are compensable D. holding that it was unfairly prejudicial and an error to adjudicate a motion for attorney fees filed after the deadline for filing a notice of appeal had passed E. holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal after an untimely filing of a notice of appeal

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the dispositive events for purposes of the new fee obligations under 1915b1 are the bringing of a civil action and the filing of an appeal once these milestones have passed fees do not attach to later activities
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: your , zynga 's , or a zynga corporate family member 's intellectual property ( for example , trademarks , trade dress , domain names , trade secrets , copyrights or patents ) ; or

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex.1999). However, a careful review of the Scotts’ motion shows that its substance is consistent with its title. The pertinent portions of the motion assert “good cause” for an extension under section 13.01(f). The Scotts do not cite section 13.01(g), and they do not assert that their failure to timely file the expert reports and curricula vitae within 180 days was the result of accident or mistake rather than intentional conduct or conscious indifference. Finally, although not dispositive, the motion does not even contain a general prayer; rather, it ends by praying “for all the relief requested above.” The record shows that the Scotts never sought an extension under section 13.01(g). See Rosa v. Caldwell, 159 S.W.3d 695, 698-99 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2004, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). And, in their appellate briefing, the Scotts Options: A. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for continuance when not in proper affidavit form B. holding that a motion to continue a hearing on a postjudgment motion was ineffective to extend the period for the trial court to rule on the motion absent the express consent of the parties C. holding trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion for new trial by operation of law because motion was not properly presented even though a notice of presentment was filed and the docket sheet contained an entry for the motion having been filed D. holding that substance of motion to extend time was a section 1301f motion rather than a section 1301g motion and that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying the section 1301f motion E. holding that the district court did not err by concluding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance motion to withdraw and motion for reconsideration and rehearing

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that substance of motion to extend time was a section 1301f motion rather than a section 1301g motion and that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying the section 1301f motion
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Precision and Aero-Missile hereby offer and the Executive accepts employment as Chief Executive Officer of Precision and President of Aero-Missile, effective as of April 1, 2016 (the "Effective Date"). Executive's office will be located at the Company's headquarters at 351 Camer Drive, Bensalem, PA 19020.

assistant: Employment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in multiple original, facsimile or electronic counterparts (including via PDF), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that the trial judge exceeded his authority in making any modification effective through the child’s nineteenth birthday. “One of the basic rules of construction of contracts is that the law in force at the date of making a contract determines the rights of the parties under the contract.” Paul, 214 Va. at 653, 203 S.E.2d at 125. The law in effect in 1993 contained a clause, found in former Code § 20-107.2, that is substantially similar to current Code § 20-124.2(C). That statute also authorized a judge to order support for a child until the age of nineteen or the child’s graduation from high school. Therefore, although the trial judge did not cite the correct statute, the remedy he applied is contemplated by the agreement in this case. See Paul, 214 Va. at 653, 203 S.E.2d at 125 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we hold that the trial judge’s Options: A. holding individual who signed contract on behalf of a corporation is individually liable where he knew corporation was not incorporated at the time the contract was executed B. holding that federal statutes and regulations can form the basis of a breach of contract claim if expressly incorporated into the contract C. holding as much D. holding that the validity of a contract for a commission for the sale of real estate is determined by the law of the state where the contract is made E. holding that the law in effect at the time a contract is made is as much a part of the contract as if incorporated therein

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that the law in effect at the time a contract is made is as much a part of the contract as if incorporated therein
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: By accepting this Award Agreement, you acknowledge that you shall be solely responsible for the satisfaction of any taxes that may arise with respect to the grant, vesting or settlement of the RSUs, and that neither the Company nor the Committee shall have any obligation whatsoever to pay such taxes; provided that the Company’s obligation to withhold taxes with respect to the issuance of the Shares shall be satisfied by any method acceptable to the Committee (including withholding of Shares, but only up to the minimum legally-required tax withholdings). In the event that any payment or benefit received or to be received by you pursuant to the Plan or otherwise (collectively, the “ Payments ”) would result in a “parachute payment” as described in Section 280G of the Code (or any successor provision), notwithstanding the other provisions of this Award Agreement, the Plan, or any other agreement or arrangement (but subject to any contrary provisions of any separate unexpired employment or other agreement between you and the Company), such Payments shall not, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum amount that may be paid to you without triggering golden parachute penalties under Section 280G and related provisions of the Code, as determined in good faith by the Company’s independent auditors. If any benefits must be cut back to avoid triggering such penalties, they shall be cut back in the priority order designated by the Company. If an amount in excess of the limit set forth in this Section 7 is paid to you, you shall repay the excess amount to the Company on demand, with interest at the rate provided for in Code Section 1274(b)(2)(B) (or any successor provision). The Company and you agree to cooperate with each other in connection with any administrative or judicial proceedings concerning the existence or amount of golden parachute penalties. The foregoing reduction, however, shall only apply if it increases the net amount you would realize from Payments, after payment of income and excise taxes on such Payments. This Award Agreement shall be construed and interpreted to comply with Section 409A of the Code so as to avoid any tax, penalty, or interest thereunder.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower will comply, and will cause each Subsidiary to comply, with all minimum funding requirements, and all other material requirements, of ERISA, if applicable, so as not to give rise to any liability thereunder.

assistant: Erisa
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: additionally , we may , in appropriate circumstances and at our sole discretion , suspend or terminate accounts of users who may be repeat infringers of third party intellectual property rights .

assistant: Unilateral termination
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement shall automatically terminate at the later of (i) such time as each of the Stockholder’s rights hereunder have terminated pursuant to their terms and (ii) the date on which the Stockholder Group Owns less than 9.8% of the Class A Common Stock of the Company. Upon such termination, no party shall have any further obligations or liabilities hereunder; provided that such termination shall not relieve any party from liability for any breach of this Agreement prior to such termination.

assistant: Terminations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices and other communications to G&W, or its designated agent, required or permitted under this Award Notice shall be written, and shall either be delivered personally or sent by registered or certified first-call mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, by facsimile or electronically. If such notice or other communication is to G&W, then it should be addressed to G&W’s office at 200 Meridian Centre, Suite 300, Rochester, New York 14618, Attention: Equity Plan Administrator; Telephone: (585) 328-8601; Facsimile: (585) 328-8622; Email: EquityPlanAdmin@gwrr.com. If such notice or other communication is to G&W’s designated agent, then it should be addressed and sent in accordance with established procedures. Each such notice and other communication delivered personally shall be deemed to have been given when received. Each such notice and other communication delivered by United States mail shall be deemed to have been given when received, and each such notice and other communication delivered by facsimile or electronically shall be deemed to have been given when it is so transmitted and the appropriate answerback is received.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices, consents, requests, approvals, demands, or other communication by any party to this Warrant must be in writing and shall be deemed to have been validly served, given, or delivered (a) upon the earlier of actual receipt and three (3) Business Days after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class, registered or certified mail return receipt requested, with proper postage prepaid; (b) upon transmission, when sent by email or fax transmission (except that, if not given during normal business hours for the recipient, shall be deemed to have been given at the opening of business on the next Business Day for the recipient); (c) one Business Day after deposit with a reputable overnight courier with all charges prepaid; or (d) when delivered, if hand-delivered by messenger, all of which shall be addressed to the party to be notified and sent to the address, facsimile number, or email address indicated below. The Company or Holder may change its mailing or email address or facsimile number by giving the other party written notice thereof in accordance with the terms.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Licensee shall at all times during the Term maintain a Sales Force containing a reasonable number of sales representatives in order to meet Licensee’s obligations under Section ‎4.4 with respect to the Licensee Territory. The Sales Force may consist of employees of Licensee or a contract sales force (or a combination thereof); provided that Licensee shall remain responsible for the management, supervision, and performance of such contract sales force.

assistant: General
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Joint Lead Arrangers shall have received (a) the audited consolidated balance sheets of the Borrower and related statements of income, equity and cash flows of the Borrower for the three (3) most recently completed fiscal years ended at least 90 days before the Other Debt Refinancing Closing Date and (b) unaudited consolidated balance sheets and related statements of income and cash flows of the Borrower for each subsequent fiscal quarter ended at least 45 days before the Other Debt Refinancing Closing Date (other than any fiscal fourth quarter); provided that the financial statements referred to in clauses (a) and (b) will be deemed received by the Joint Lead Arrangers upon the filing thereof by the Borrower with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: demonstrations, the government nonetheless had probable cause to believe that she committed an offense relating to the April 12 Four Seasons incident. While Sennett’s status as a photojournalist may provide an innocent explanation for her presence at the April 12 Four Seasons vandalism, “[t]he fact that an innocent explanation may be consistent with the facts alleged ... does not negate probable cause.” United States v. Fama, 758 F.2d 834, 838 (2d Cir.1985). In short, given all the facts and circumstances summarized above pointing to probable cause, the added information that Sennett is a photojournalist provides only “[t]he possibility of an innocent explanation [that] does not vitiate properly established probable cause.” United States v. Booker, 612 F.3d 596, 601 (7th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). To conclude otherwise — that is, to accept Options: A. holding that officers had probable cause to arrest driver and two passengers where cocaine and contraband were found in glove compartment and backseat armrest of vehicle and none of the men offered any information regarding the ownership of the drugs and contraband on the ground that the drugs and contraband could have been in the possession of any one of the three vehicle occupants or all three of them jointly B. holding that contraband would have been inevitably discovered where agents conducted a warrantless search while obtaining a search warrant and later conducted a second legal search in which agents discovered contraband C. holding that federal agents had probable cause to search defendants truck for drugs and contraband even though defendants conduct was consistent with innocent behavior D. holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same E. holding that officer who smelled burning marijuana while approaching defendants vehicle stopped for tail light violation had probable cause to search for contraband

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that federal agents had probable cause to search defendants truck for drugs and contraband even though defendants conduct was consistent with innocent behavior
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the undisputed facts of this case, that such inability had no effect on his capacity to intend the consequences of his actions. Salter freely admitted that he shot the decedent for the specific purpose of killing him, and the record reveals without dispute that at the time of the shooting he was leading a relatively normal day-to-day life, which included holding a job, maintaining a checking account, keeping his automobiles in working order, paying bills, and raising three children. Under such circumstances, there is no basis whatever for a conclusion that his ability to intend the consequences of the shooting was undermined by his purported inability to appreciate the rightness or wrongness of his conduct. Accord Stein v. Mass. Bay Ins. Co., 172 Ga. App. 811, 813 (324 SE2d 510) (1984) (<HOLDING>). For these reasons, we hold that the trial Options: A. holding that evi dence establishing lack of criminal intent does not necessarily demonstrate in a civil case that the act is not intentional B. holding that mere fact that clerk assigned defendants case a civil docket number did not demonstrate that the district court failed to treat the case as a criminal matter C. holding that a criminal statute does not provide a corresponding civil cause of action D. holding that accident does not include intentional act if insured acted with intent to harm and noting that intentional acts exclusion applies if insured acted with specific intent to harm E. holding that the governments lack of direct evidence as to defendants knowledge does not demonstrate that its case was baseless

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that evi dence establishing lack of criminal intent does not necessarily demonstrate in a civil case that the act is not intentional
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment shall become effective and binding on each of the Parties upon the execution and delivery of this Amendment by each of (a) Ascent and Monitronics and (b) the Consenting Noteholders constituting the Requisite Consenting Noteholders (such date, the “ Amendment Effective Date ”).

assistant: Effectiveness
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: in the air to be handcuffed, signifying that he knew that he had said something wrong. And when given the opportunity to present testimony to Judge Lee in the DWI matter after being called- as a witness by his Own defense counsel, Brock refused. Based on the combined and cumulative force of all the evidence and testimony, we conclude that a reasonable person could interpret' the statemen Brock' made to Judge Lee as a threat to harm Judge Lee by an unlawful act, thoqgh it was more of an implied or veiled threat. See Manemann, 878 S.W.2d at 337-38 (“That a threat is subtle does not make it less of a threat .... Alleged threats should be considered in light of their entire factual context, including the surrounding events and the reaction of the listeners.”); Meyer, 366 S.W.3d at 731-32 (<HOLDING>); see also Austin v. State, No. 10-12-00066-CR, Options: A. holding that the evidence supporting appellants conviction is sufficient to demonstrate that he threatened a judge when he stated the following in a letter now the chips will fall where they will proceed further at your own personal risk B. holding that because at sentencing the appellant had asked the district court to impose the same sentence he now claims is substantively unreasonable the argument he seeks to make was waived C. holding that case was justiciable when at least some of the appellants have a sufficient personal stake in its adjudication D. holding that the petitioner in that case could not invoke the protections provided by miranda including the right to counsel because he was not in custody at the time he stated t think i need a lawyer E. holding the record must demonstrate that the alj considered all of the evidence and the alj must discuss the evidence supporting his decision the uncontroverted evidence he chooses not to rely upon and significantly probative evidence he rejects

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the evidence supporting appellants conviction is sufficient to demonstrate that he threatened a judge when he stated the following in a letter now the chips will fall where they will proceed further at your own personal risk
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Awards of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units or Other Share- Based Awards granted to a person newly hired shall have a Vesting Period as determined by the Committee. The Committee may, in its sole discretion waive the forfeiture period and any other conditions set forth in any Award Agreement subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee shall deem appropriate.

assistant: Terms
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 8.05, the General Partner may keep confidential from the Limited Partners, for such period of time as the General Partner determines in its sole and absolute discretion to be reasonable, any information that (i) the General Partner reasonably believes to be in the nature of trade secrets or other information the disclosure of which the General Partner in good faith believes is not in the best interests of the Partnership or could damage the Partnership or its business or (ii) the Partnership is required by law or by agreements with unaffiliated third parties to keep confidential.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: The expiration or termination of this Agreement shall not affect such of the provisions of this Agreement as expressly provide that they will operate after any such expiration or termination or which of necessity must continue to have effect after such expiration or termination, notwithstanding that the clauses themselves do not expressly provide for this.

assistant: Yes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the parents’ presence and request to see [his or] her child. And, in order to ensure the true voluntariness of a statement, those actually questioning the juvenile have an affirmative duty to stop the questioning and allow the parent to confer with [his or] her child.” People v. Brown, 182 Ill.App.3d 1046, 131 Ill.Dec. 534, 538 N.E.2d 909 (1989). See also In re Lashun H., 284 Ill.A 93) (finding that seventeen-year-old had opportunity to consult with custodian so statements were admissible); People v. Thomas, 223 A.D.2d 612, 636 N.Y.S.2d 830 (1996) (finding no evidence that police used deception or trickery to isolate seventeen-year-old defendant from his parents so statement admissible); Hickman v. State, 654 N.E.2d 278, 281 (Ind. App.1995) (declining to exclude statements of (1986) (<HOLDING>); Sublette, supra, 365 No.2d 775 (observing Options: A. holding that we have never found that it is permissible for a jury to make an inference from the invocation of a witnesss assertion of the fifth amendment B. holding that juveniles request to call parent is assertion of fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination C. holding a juveniles request to speak to a probation officer is not a per se invocation of fifth amendment rights D. holding that juveniles request for parent is invocation of fifth amendment rights E. holding that juveniles may waive constitutional rights

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that juveniles request for parent is invocation of fifth amendment rights
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The agreements in this Section and the indemnity provisions of Section 10.02(e) shall survive the resignation of the Administrative Agent, the Collateral Agent, any L/C Issuer and the Swing Line Lender, the replacement of any Lender, the termination of the Aggregate Commitments and the repayment, satisfaction or discharge of all the other Secured Obligations.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party (a) irrevocably and unconditionally submits to the personal jurisdiction of the federal courts of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas or any Texas State Court sitting in Austin, Texas, (b) agrees that it will not attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion or other request for leave from any such court, (c) agrees that any actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be brought, tried and determined only in such courts, (d) waives any claim of improper venue or any claim that those courts are an inconvenient forum, and (e) agrees that it will not bring any action relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in any court other than the aforesaid courts. The parties to this Agreement agree that the provision of notice in connection with any such action or proceeding in the manner provided in Section 4.3 or in such other manner as may be permitted by applicable law, shall be valid and sufficient service thereof.

assistant: Submission To Jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: You agree that the Evaluation Material owned by the Company or its affiliates in the first instance is and will remain the property of the Company or its affiliates, as applicable, and that neither the Company nor any of its affiliates or Representatives has granted you any license, copyright, or similar right with respect to any of the Evaluation Material or any other information provided to you by or on behalf of the Company.

assistant: No
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Title VII’s charge-filing requirement when he filed an unverified Intake Questionnaire within the statutory time period for filing a charge and then filed a verified formal charge outside that time period. (Unlike the ADEA, Title VII requires a charge to be filed under oath or affirmation. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(b).) Relying on the EEOC regulations that allow a charge to be amended to cure technical defects including the lack of verification, the court reached the "inescapable conclusion that the completed Intake Questionnaire, in the context of both the amendment procedures and the liberality to be ascribed to procedural requirements, is sufficient to constitute a charge." Id. at 1443. Contra Profit v. Keycom Electronic Publishing, 625 F.Supp. 400, 403-04 (N.D.Ill.1985) (Shadur, J.) (<HOLDING>), overruled on other grounds, Gilardi v. Options: A. holding that such a theory is viable under title vii B. holding that there is no individual liability under title vii C. holding that until a document is submitted under oath or affirmation there is no title vii charge to be amended D. holding individual employees may be liable under title vii E. holding that relief granted under title vii is against the employer not individual employees whose actions constituted a violation of title vii emphasis in original

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that until a document is submitted under oath or affirmation there is no title vii charge to be amended