flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each subsidiary of the Company has been duly incorporated, organized or formed and is existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation, organization or formation with power and authority (corporate and other) to own its properties and conduct its business as described in the SEC Documents; and each subsidiary of the Company is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation in good standing in all other jurisdictions in which its ownership or lease of property or the conduct of its business requires such qualification, except in each case where the failure to be so qualified or in good standing would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Subsidiaries
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement) and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered (by electronic communication, facsimile or otherwise) to the other parties. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Agreement by facsimile or other electronic image scan transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Agreement. The article and section headings of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not to be considered in construing this Agreement.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: and such opinions may be given on the facts as proved by other witnesses”; see also Ronald L. Carlson & Michael Scott Carlson, Carlson on Evidence 398 (3d ed. 2015). 11 Weeks v. State, 270 Ga. App. 889, 893 (2) (608 SE2d 259) (2004) (punctuation omitted); accord McCrickard v. State, 249 Ga. App. 715, 718 (2) (549 SE2d 505) (2001); see also Burgess v. State, 292 Ga. 821, 822 (2) (742 SE2d 464) (2013) (“A witness need not be formally educated in the field a witness possesses such learning or experience to qualify as an expert witness lies within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed unless manifestly abused.” (punctuation omitted)); Griffin, 243 Ga. App. at 286 (5) (same); see also United States v. Anderson, 560 F3d 275, 281-82 (1) (C) (5th Cir. 2009) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Shamsud-Din, No. 10 CR 927, Options: A. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing plaintiffs expert witness to testify when it also allowed defendants expert witness who disputed the methodology used by plaintiffs expert to testify B. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing expert testimony from the director of a center specializing in serving victims of sexual exploitation C. holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the testimony of a witness that was not highly probative D. holding district court did not abuse its discretion by allowing government to ask leading questions of eightyearold witness reluctant to testify regarding sexual abuse E. holding juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing expert testimony from the director of a center specializing in serving victims of sexual exploitation
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 166a(c) provides that a summary judgment shall be rendered if the discovery documents, pleadings, admissions, affidavits, stipulations of the parties, and authenticated or certified public records, if any, on file at the time of the hearing, or filed thereafter and before judgment with permission of the court, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Tex.R.Civ.P. 166a(c) (emphasis added). The judgment in this ease simply includes a partial recitation of the standard set out in the rule. This does not indicate, as Fry argues, that all or part of the judgment was granted based on the pleadings alone. See Hidalgo v. Surety Sav. and Loan Ass’n, 462 S.W.2d 540, 545 (Tex. 1971) (<HOLDING>). We overrule Fry’s first point of eiTor. In Options: A. holding that pleadings cannot be regarded as summary judgment evidence B. holding that motion to dismiss cannot be treated as summary judgment C. holding that whether pleadings fail to state a cause of action may not be resolved by summary judgment D. holding that unverified pleadings do not constitute competent summary judgment evidence E. holding that unsworn pleadings do not constitute proper summary judgment evidence

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that pleadings cannot be regarded as summary judgment evidence
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that coerced government speech is akin to economic regulation and not entitled to First Amendment protection. See Glickman, 521 U.S. at 476, 117 S.Ct. 2130. Instead, the United Foods Court propounded a broad constitutional protection against compelled contributions for commercial speech. See United Foods, 533 U.S. at 414, 121 S.Ct. 2334. Indeed, applying United Foods, one court has held that the issue of government speech, which generally involves the state’s power to control the content of its speech, is fundamentally different from the “government’s authority to compel [plaintiffs] to support speech with which they personally disagree; such compulsion is a form of ‘government interference with private speech.’ ” Livestock Marketing Ass. v. USDA, 335 F.3d 711, 720 (8th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>) (certiorari granted in part by) Veneman v. Options: A. holding that limits on contributions to political committees which advocate the views and candidacies of a number of candidates induce no greater first amendment scrutiny than limits on contributions to an individual candidate B. recognizing retaliation involving promotion as adverse employment actions under the first amendment C. holding compelled contributions in beef promotion violated first amendment D. holding that first amendment protections apply to compelled speech as well as restrictions on speech E. holding that the countys permit fee violated the first amendment

assistant: The best answer is C. holding compelled contributions in beef promotion violated first amendment
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: No waiver or course of dealing shall be established by (a) the failure or delay of any Agent or any Lender to require strict performance by Borrowers with any terms of the Loan Documents, or to exercise any rights or remedies with respect to Collateral or otherwise; (b) the making of any Loan or issuance of any Letter of Credit during a Default, Event of Default or other failure to satisfy any conditions precedent; or (c) acceptance by any Agent or any Lender of any payment or performance by an Obligor under any Loan Documents in a manner other than that specified therein. It is expressly acknowledged by Borrowers that any failure to satisfy a financial covenant on a measurement date shall not be cured or remedied by satisfaction of such covenant on a subsequent date.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower shall obtain and keep in force insurance of the types and in amounts customarily carried in lines of business similar to Borrower’s, as well as such other insurance and coverages as may be necessary to comply with any Requirement of Law or as Agent may otherwise reasonably require from time to time, including the insurance policies and coverages set forth on Schedule 4.7 (the “ Insurance Requirements Schedule ”). All insurance policies and coverages shall satisfy the Insurance Requirements (as defined on said Schedule). Borrower’s compliance or non-compliance with the Insurance Requirements shall not limit the liability of any Credit Party for the acts or omissions of Borrower, any other Credit Party, or any of their respective related Persons, as provided in this Agreement or in any of the other Loan Documents. If Agent exercises its remedies and there is a sale of the Collateral or any other transfer of title or assignment of the Collateral in extinguishment, in whole or in part, of the Obligations, all right, title and interest of Borrower in and to all required policies of insurance relating to the Collateral so transferred shall inure to the benefit of and pass to the successor in interest to Borrower or the purchaser or grantee of the Collateral, to the extent such policies are assignable pursuant to the terms thereof.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company will reimburse Executive for reasonable travel, entertainment or other expenses incurred by Executive in the furtherance of or in connection with the performance of Executive’s duties hereunder during the Transition Period, in accordance with the Company’s expense reimbursement policy in effect from time to time.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: acts of fraud, she must satisfy the requirements of Rule 9(b) twice. See Emery II, 134 F.3d at 1323. Ms. Goren’s amended complaint fails to allege a “pattern of racketeering activity” with sufficient particularity to satisfy the requirements of Rule 9(b). In fact, Ms. Goren’s attempt to allege a “pattern of racketeering activity” fails on several fronts. The first and most glaring deficiency in the amended complaint is its failure to allege two predicate acts. The amended complaint alleges only one fraudulent transaction — the sale of two bottles of “Essential Minerals” to Ms. Goren. This is simply not enough to state a claim under § 1962(c). Indeed, we have repeatedly held that a plaintiff’s conclusory allegations that “defendants” also defrauded unidentifi 918, 923 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). Because the single sale to Ms. Goren is the Options: A. holding that unspecified allegations that other companies were defrauded by use of the mails in the same manner as plaintiff did not satisfy particularity requirement of rule 9b B. holding a complaint failed to satisfy rule 9b where the allegations were lacking in detail C. holding that plaintiffs must provide more than conclusory allegations to satisfy rule 9bs requirement that circumstances of fraud be pleaded with particularity D. holding allegations that fraudulent statements were made during fourmonth period insufficient to satisfy rule 9b E. holding plaintiffs fraud claim failed rule 9b particularity requirement which in turn meant deceptive trade practices claim failed the particularity requirement

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that unspecified allegations that other companies were defrauded by use of the mails in the same manner as plaintiff did not satisfy particularity requirement of rule 9b
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to the extent that it were used to provide services to Hope’s patients constitutes an “acquisition” in the plain meaning of the term. Id. at -, 691 S.E.2d at - (emphasis added). In the instant case, CCNC’s application clearly indicated that it was co-applicant AOR, using funds from its parent company USO, that would actually purchase the LINAC. The LINAC would then be transferred to CCNC’s possession and control to be used to provide services to CCNC’s patients. The fact that the funds used to purchase the LINAC would originate from USO is immaterial to our analysis, as the CON law allows applicants to rely upon other non-applicant entities for funding the proposed project. See Retirement Villages, Inc. v. N.C. Dept of Human Res., 124 N.C. App. 495, 499, 477 S.E.2d 697, 699 (1996) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we hold that AOR and CCNC were Options: A. holding that connecticut courts look to the identity or instrumentality test to determine whether one corporate entity can properly be held responsible for the obligations of another corporate entity B. holding that a district court can rely on the probation report and is not required to make independent findings regarding the defendants financial resources C. holding that the ij may not rely on a factually unsupported assertion in a state department report to deem an applicant not credible D. holding that the con statute allows a con applicant to rely on the financial resources of another entity for its funding E. holding that a party may not rely upon an estoppel defense against a governmental entity to support a breach of contract claim based upon an assertion of apparent authority of the agent signing the alleged contract on behalf of the entity

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the con statute allows a con applicant to rely on the financial resources of another entity for its funding
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Base salary for this position will be $17,307.70 currently payable bi-weekly, equivalent to $450,000.20 on an annualized basis. Your performance and base salary will generally be reviewed on an annual basis during the normal executive review process. Your 2015 performance and base salary will be reviewed during the normal executive review process, expected to commence in the first quarter of 2016. I am pleased to advise you that in your specific case, any merit increase will not be prorated based on your date of hire.

assistant: Base Salary
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Facility Agreement as amended hereby, together with all other Loan Documents, contains the entire understanding among the parties hereto with respect to the matters covered thereby and supersedes any and all other written and oral communications, negotiations, commitments and writings with respect thereto.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Partnership Entities maintain, or are entitled to the benefits of, insurance covering their Properties, operations, personnel and businesses against such losses and risks as is reasonably adequate to protect them and their businesses in a manner consistent with other businesses similarly situated in similar industries. All policies of insurance insuring the Partnership Entities or any of their respective businesses, assets, employees, officers and directors are in full force and effect as of the date hereof; and the Partnership Entities are in compliance with the terms of such policies in all material respects.

assistant: Insurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice or report required or permitted to be given or made under this Agreement by either Party shall be in writing and delivered to the other Party at its address indicated in this Agreement (or to such other address as a Party may specify by notice under this Agreement) by courier or by registered or certified airmail, postage prepaid, courier service, or by facsimile, which facsimile is promptly confirmed, in writing, by registered or certified airmail, postage prepaid. All notices shall be effective as of the date received by the addressee.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: applies in “extremely limited” circumstances, and requires more than a mere difference among state laws. Reagan, 1997-NMCA-014, ¶9, 123 N.M. 68, 933 P.2d 867 (internal quotati bitration may not apply to the initial determination of the existence of a contract, New Mexico does have a strong public policy in favor of freedom of contract. See United Wholesale Liquor Co., 108 N.M. at 471, 775 P.2d at 237. Moreover, like Texas, New Mexico has a strong policy in favor of arbitration. See Santa Fe Techs., Inc., 2002-NMCA-030, ¶51, 131 N.M. 772, 42 P.3d 1221 (“Arbitration is a form of dispute resolution highly favored in New Mexico” promoting “both judicial efficiency and conservation of resources by all parties.”); Casias v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 1999-NMCA-046, ¶7, 126 N.M. 772, 975 P.2d 385 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we look to Texas law to determine Options: A. recognizing a strong policy preference in favor of arbitration B. recognizing the strong policy favoring dismissal when a court cannot join a tribe because of sovereign immunity C. recognizing a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration in the faa D. recognizing a strong presumption favoring arbitrability E. recognizing the supreme courts repeated reaffirmation of new mexicos strong public policy favoring resolution of disputes through arbitration

assistant: The best answer is E. recognizing the supreme courts repeated reaffirmation of new mexicos strong public policy favoring resolution of disputes through arbitration
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The closing (the “ Closing ”) of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the “ Transactions ”) shall take place on the Effective Date (as defined below) at such location to be determined by the Company and Parent, commencing upon the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions and obligations of the Parties to consummate the Transactions contemplated hereby, as more fully set forth in Section 1.03 herein (other than conditions and obligations with respect to the actions that the respective Parties will take at Closing) or such other date and time as the Parties may mutually determine (the “ Closing Date ”).

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each party hereto acknowledges that each of them has had the benefit of legal counsel of its own choice and has been afforded an opportunity to review this Agreement with its legal counsel and that this Agreement shall be construed as if jointly drafted by the parties hereto. Each party hereto expressly acknowledges that in the event of any inconsistencies between this Agreement and any Applicable Credit Document, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall govern and control.

assistant: Construction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except would not reasonably be expected to result in, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, Holdings, the Borrower and its Subsidiaries have timely filed all Federal and state and other tax returns and reports required to be filed under applicable Law, and have timely paid all Federal and state and other taxes, assessments, fees and other governmental charges (including satisfying their withholding tax obligations) levied or imposed on their properties, income or assets that have become due and payable, except those which are being contested in good faith by appropriate actions diligently conducted and for which adequate reserves (in the good faith judgment of management of Holdings, the Borrower or the Restricted Subsidiaries) have been provided in accordance with GAAP.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: “cable service” through a “cable system,” within the meaning of §§ 522(5), (6) and (7). Therefore, if Noferi intercepted or received or assisted in intercepting or receiving any unauthorized communications over Cablev-ision’s cable system, he violated section 553(a)(1). Section 605(a) provides that “[n]o person not entitled thereto shall receive or assist in receiving any interstate or foreign communication by radio and use such communication (or any information therein contained) for his own benefit .... ” There is a split in the circuits on the issue of whether cable television programming falls within the definition of “communication by radio.” Compare Int’l Cablevision, Inc. v. Sykes, 75 F.3d 123 (2d Cir.1996) with TER Cable Co. v. Cable City Corp., 267 F.3d 196 (3d Cir.2001)(<HOLDING>)(emphasis added); and U.S. v. Norris, 88 F.3d Options: A. holding that 605 encompasses the interception of satellite transmissions to the extent reception occurs prior to or not in connection with distribution of service over a cable system and no more B. holding that a denial of entitlement to service connection is a factual determination that we may not review C. holding over D. holding that the commercial use requirement of section 1125c is virtually synonymous with the in connection with the sale offering for sale distribution or advertising of goods and services requirement of the lanham act E. holding that in light of the evidence it strains credulity to believe that the two corporations have no corporate connection as defendants assert and thus service on one did not effect service on the other

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that 605 encompasses the interception of satellite transmissions to the extent reception occurs prior to or not in connection with distribution of service over a cable system and no more
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, including, without limitation, facsimile or email execution copies. If so executed, each counterpart is to be deemed an original for all purposes, and all such counterparts shall, collectively, constitute one agreement.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: GUARANTOR, AND BY ACCEPTANCE OF THIS GUARANTY, EACH AGENT, SWING LINE LENDER, ISSUING LENDER AND LENDER, WAIVES ITS RIGHTS TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION BASED UPON OR ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS GUARANTY OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY, IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR OTHER LITIGATION OF ANY TYPE BROUGHT BY ANY OF THE PARTIES TO THE CREDIT AGREEMENT AGAINST ANY OTHER PARTY OR ANY PARTICIPANT OR ASSIGNEE, WHETHER WITH RESPECT TO CONTRACT CLAIMS, TORT CLAIMS, OR OTHERWISE. GUARANTOR, AND BY ACCEPTANCE OF THIS GUARANTY, EACH AGENT, SWING LINE LENDER, ISSUING LENDER AND LENDER, AGREES THAT ANY SUCH CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION SHALL BE TRIED BY A COURT TRIAL WITHOUT A JURY. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, GUARANTOR, AND BY ACCEPTANCE OF THIS GUARANTY, ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND EACH OF THE LENDERS, FURTHER AGREES THAT ITS RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IS WAIVED BY OPERATION OF THIS SECTION AS TO ANY ACTION, COUNTERCLAIM OR OTHER PROCEEDING WHICH SEEKS, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, TO CHALLENGE THE VALIDITY OR ENFORCEABILITY OF THIS GUARANTY OR ANY PROVISION HEREOF OR THEREOF. THIS WAIVER SHALL APPLY TO ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS, RENEWALS, SUPPLEMENTS OR MODIFICATIONS TO THIS GUARANTY.

assistant: Waiver Of Jury Trials
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement; signature pages may be detached from multiple separate counterparts and attached to a single counterpart so that all signatures are physically attached to the same counterpart. Delivery of an executed signature page by facsimile or electronic transmission shall be as effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart.

assistant: Counterparts
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement and the other Transaction Documents constitute the entire agreement among the Persons party hereto and thereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among such Persons with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party hereby agrees that the Holders shall be express third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement and shall have the right to enforce the rights of the Warrant Holder under this Agreement and any other right ascribed to a Holder under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the right to seek remedies against the Company for a breach by the Company of any of its covenants or representations or warranties hereunder. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the immediately preceding sentence, nothing expressed or referred to in this Agreement shall be construed to give any Person other than the parties to this Agreement any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or with respect to this Agreement or any provision of this Agreement. In the event of any conflict, discrepancy or ambiguity between the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement and any schedules or attachments hereto, the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall take precedence.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All covenants, representations and warranties made in this Agreement continue in full force until this Agreement has terminated pursuant to its terms and all Obligations (other than inchoate indemnity obligations) have been satisfied. So long as Borrower has satisfied the Obligations (other than inchoate indemnity obligations, any other obligations which, by their terms, are to survive the termination of this Agreement, and any Obligations under Bank Services Agreements that are cash collateralized in accordance with Section 4.1 of this Agreement), this Agreement may be terminated prior to the Term Loan Maturity Date by Borrower, effective three (3) Business Days after written notice of termination is given to Bank. Those obligations that are expressly specified in this Agreement as surviving this Agreement’s termination shall continue to survive notwithstanding this Agreement’s termination.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: litigation in court—costs which the School District and its amici take pains to emphasize are quite' substantial. See Appellees’ Supplemental Brief Regarding the Applicability of Mount Airy # 1, LLC v. Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, at 8-9; Brief of Amici Crestwood Area School District, et al., at 29 (enumerating appeal costs such as appraiser fees, expert witness fees, filing fees, and attorney fees). Further, the alleged political motivation, being an assertion of fact, contra Brief for Appellees at 37 n.20, must be accepted as true for present purposes. It should 'go without saying that the Uniformity Clause prohibits disparate treatment of sub-classifications of property in order to avoid political accountability. See generally Downingtown, 590 Pa. at 470, 913 A.2d at 201 (<HOLDING>). It bears emphasis that there is no Options: A. recognizing that individuals are generally not similarly situated when different decision makers are involved in the respective disciplinary action B. recognizing that tenured troopers are not similarly situated to probationary troopers C. recognizing that act and wetlands regulations are generally applicable to all similarly situated property owners and cannot be viewed as being directed solely at the plaintiffs D. recognizing the potential for discrimination by local officials among similarly situated property owners who are underrepresented in the general population E. recognizing general rule

assistant: The best answer is D. recognizing the potential for discrimination by local officials among similarly situated property owners who are underrepresented in the general population
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Guaranty may not be amended except in writing signed by the Requisite Lenders (or all of the Lenders if required under the terms of the Term Loan Agreement), the Administrative Agent and each Guarantor.

assistant: Amendments
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Borrower shall prepare and timely file all tax returns required to be filed by it and pay and discharge all taxes imposed upon it or in respect of any of its property and assets before the same shall become in default, as well as all lawful claims (including, without limitation, claims for labor, materials and supplies) which, if unpaid, might become a Security Interest upon the Collateral or any part thereof, except in each case, for any such taxes (i) as are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves have been established, (ii) in excess of $100,000 as to which such failure to have paid does not create any risk of sale, forfeiture, loss, confiscation or seizure of the Ship or criminal liability, or (iii) the failure of which to pay or discharge would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the business, assets or financial condition of the Borrower or to affect the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability of the Finance Documents.

assistant: Taxes
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Bankruptcy Act of 1898 provided in relevant part: "A discharge in bankruptcy shall release a bankrupt from all of his provable debts, whether allowable in full or in part, except such as ... are liabilities for obtaining money or property by false pretenses or false representations....” 11 U.S.C. § 35(a)(2) (re pealed 1978). The commentary in Collier on Bankruptcy suggests that the addition of "actual fraud” simply clarifies the limited scope of the fraud exception: The addition of the words “or actual fraud” probably makes no change in the law as it existed prior to enactment of the [Bankruptcy Act of 1978] because false pretenses and representations were construed to mean acts involving moral turpitude or intentional wrong.... In any event, section 523(a)(2)(A) was intend (7th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908, 109 S.Ct. 260, Options: A. holding that jurys determination is not binding on courts ch 93a decision B. holding that injunctive relief was unwarranted when the jurys award already included prospective relief C. holding damages do not constitute other equitable relief D. holding jurys finding of liability on partys claim does not bestow prevailing party status when party received no relief on that claim E. holding that jurys finding was binding on court considering claim for equitable relief

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that jurys finding was binding on court considering claim for equitable relief
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: to law standard. Compare Rule 72(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. with Rule 72(b), Fed. R.Civ.P. The circuits are not uniform on whether Rule 11 sanctions matters are dispositive or non-dispositive and it does not appear that the Fourth Circuit has yet spoken definitively on this point. Compare Maisonville v. F2 America, Inc., 902 F.2d 746, 747 (9th Cir. 1990) (stating that Rule 11 sanctions are non-dispositive and thus subject to review pursuant to the clearly erroneous or contrary to law standard); Weeks Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Raymond Int’l Bldrs., Inc., 174 F.R.D. 301, 303 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (same); Robinson v. Eng, 148 F.R.D. 635, 641 (D.Neb.1993) (same); Klapper v. Commonwealth Realty Trust, 657 F.Supp. 948, 952-53 (D.Del.1987) (same) with Alpern v. Lieb, et al., 38 F.3d 933, 935 (7th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); Bennett v. General Caster Serv. of N. Gordon Options: A. holding that whether statements are testimonial is a legal issue subject to de novo review B. holding statutory interpretation is subject to de novo review C. holding that a motion for rule 11 sanctions is dispositive D. recognizing de novo standard of review E. holding that rule 11 sanctions are dispositive and thus subject to de novo review

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that rule 11 sanctions are dispositive and thus subject to de novo review
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Jose Samuel Letran Ruiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum, withhold ing of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, see Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.2003), we deny in part and grant in part the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that changed country conditions in Guatemala undermine Letran Ruiz’s fear of future persecution. See id. at 998-00 (<HOLDING>). Because Letran Ruiz failed to establish Options: A. holding that 8 cfr 10032c3ii applies to changed country conditions in the country of origin or deportation and not changed personal circumstances in the united states B. recognizing that a report from the state department is usually the best available source of information on country conditions C. holding that the state department country report constituted substantial evidence to support the agencys finding of changed country conditions in guatemala D. holding that for purposes of claim 4 another country means a country other than the first and second country explicitly rejecting tpllcs proposed construction E. holding that in evaluating evidence of changed country conditions the bia compares the evidence of country conditions submitted with the motion to those that existed at the time of the merits hearing below

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that the state department country report constituted substantial evidence to support the agencys finding of changed country conditions in guatemala
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: had temporarily disabled the sprinkler system while it was under repair. Little, 301 Mass. at 158-59, 16 N.E.2d 688. The court held that because there was no evidence to suggest that the fire started as a result of landlord’s act or omission, the plaintiff was required to prove that defendant was aware of the fire to hold it liable for the spread. Id. at 160, 16 N.E.2d 688. The court, however, made no mention of whether or not expert testimony was required to demonstrate that the lack of sprinklers caused the fire to spread. Unlike Little, there was evidence here that defendant was aware both of this specific fire before it spread to the building and of the increased risk o ass. 297, 302, 151 N.E. 320 (1926)); see also Commonwealth v. Levesque, 436 Mass. 443, 454, 766 N.E.2d 50 (2002) (<HOLDING>). Furthermore, the initial cause of the fire Options: A. holding that even without expert testimony the grand jurors common knowledge of the nature of fire would have allowed them to conclude that a fire spreads and becomes more dangerous the longer it is left unattended B. holding that jurors do not need expert testimony on matters of common knowledge C. holding that the relationship between fire insurance regulation and rating fire loss fire prevention and fire investigation is rational and reasonable D. holding that petition failed to allege fire hydrants were physically defective where fire hydrants did not work and plaintiffs decedent was killed in fire E. holding that the fact that the fire was communicated to other property may reasonably be inferred from common knowledge of the operation of the established laws of nature in the familiar forms of combustion and the effects of wind on fire

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that even without expert testimony the grand jurors common knowledge of the nature of fire would have allowed them to conclude that a fire spreads and becomes more dangerous the longer it is left unattended
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee and each delegate of such Committee shall be indemnified and held harmless by First Financial against and from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be made a party or in which he or she may be involved in by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with First Financial’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her, provided that First Financial is given an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it personally. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive and shall be independent of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under First Financial’s Articles of Incorporation or Regulations, by contract, as a matter of law, or otherwise.

assistant: Indemnifications
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of this Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the provisions of the internal laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision or doctrine that would result in the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Party agrees that the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement and any information, Service Recipient Data and Materials conveyed or otherwise received by or on behalf of a Party in conjunction herewith are confidential and are subject to the terms of the confidentiality provisions set forth in Section 3.04 of the Separation Agreement.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Loan Party agrees that neither it nor any of its Affiliates will now or in the future issue any press release or make any other public or private disclosure using the name of an Agent, any Lender or any of their respective Affiliates or referring to this Agreement or any other Loan Document (including schedules thereto) without the prior written consent of such Agent or such Lender, except to the extent that such Loan Party or such Affiliate is required to do so under applicable law (in which event, such Loan Party or such Affiliate will consult with such Agent or such Lender before issuing such press release or other public disclosure). Each Loan Party hereby authorizes each Agent and each Lender, after consultation with the Borrower, to advertise the closing of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and to make appropriate announcements of the financial arrangements entered into among the parties hereto, as such Agent or such Lender shall deem appropriate, including, without limitation, on a home page or similar place for dissemination of information on the Internet or worldwide web, or in announcements commonly known as tombstones, in such trade publications, business journals, newspapers of general circulation and to such selected parties as such Agent or such Lender shall deem appropriate.

assistant: Disclosures
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: in addition to the agreements , you also agree to adhere to the spotify support community guidelines that you will be presented with upon registration ( the `` support community guidelines '' ) when using the spotify support community .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: This Agreement (including the documents and the instruments referred to herein) (a) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and (b) is not intended to, and does not, confer upon any person or entity other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder.

assistant: Entire Agreements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of poorly repaired brick floors and sloppily loaded cargo certainly applies to situations in which people must entrust that most personal of things, their physical well-being, to physicians at an emergency room intimately connected with and closely controlled by a hospital. However, as explained further below, we do not believe it is necessary, as the Court of Appeals did, to impose an absolute nondelegable duty on hospitals. B. NOT SUPPORTED BY LAW IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS Tuomey Regional contends that the law of other jurisdictions does not support the Court of Appeals’ decision. We disagree. Alaska, Florida, and New York courts have applied the nondelegable duty doctrine to care provided by a hospital’s emergency room physicians. See Jackson v. Power, 743 P.2d 1376, 1385 (Alaska 1987) (<HOLDING>); superseded in part by Alaska Stát. § Options: A. holding that claim against hospital regarding patients fall caused by defective footboard on hospital bed constituted health care liability claim B. holding that a general acute care hospital may not delegate its duty to provide physicians for emergency room care because the law imposes a duty on hospital to provide that health care C. holding that hospital may be held liable for negligence of emergency room physicians under apparent agency doctrine D. holding that the law imposes on every person who enters upon an active course of conduct the positive duty to exercise ordinary care to protect others from harm and calls a violation of that duty negligence that a complete binding contract between the parties is not a prerequisite to a duty to use due care in ones actions and that architects may be held liable for a breach of the duty of care and breach of contract that results in foreseeable injury economic or otherwise E. holding that care of the grounds was part of the business of the hospital

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that a general acute care hospital may not delegate its duty to provide physicians for emergency room care because the law imposes a duty on hospital to provide that health care