flwrlabs/fed-legal huggingface dataset:
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Owners grant to the Holders’ Agent full authority to execute, deliver, acknowledge, certify and file on behalf of such Owners (in the name of any or all of the Owners or otherwise) any and all documents that the Holders’ Agent may, in his sole discretion, determine to be necessary, desirable or appropriate, in such forms and containing such provisions as the Holders’ Agent may, in its sole discretion, determine to be appropriate, in performing his duties as contemplated by this Section 6.11 . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement or in any other Transaction Document: (i) each Company Indemnified Person shall be entitled to deal exclusively with the Holders’ Agent on all matters for purposes of Article V ; and (ii) each Company Indemnified Person shall be entitled to rely conclusively (without further evidence of any kind whatsoever) on any document executed or purported to be executed on behalf of any Owner by the Holders’ Agent, and on any other action taken or purported to be taken on behalf of any Owner by the Holders’ Agent, as fully binding upon such Owner and any notice or communication delivered by Company to the Holders’ Agent shall be deemed to have been delivered to Contributor and each Owner.

assistant: Authority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The obligations of the Parties pursuant to Sections 4(h) , 7 , 8 , 14 , 15 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , and 26 shall survive the expiration and/or termination of this Agreement and/or the termination of Executive’s employment hereunder for the periods expressly designated under such sections or, if no such period is designated, for the maximum period permissible under applicable law.

assistant: Survival
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: the “use” of any trademark belonging to plaintiffs, as that term is used in the Lanham Act, because WhenU does not use any of the plaintiffs’ trademarks to indicate anything about the source of the products and services it advertises. Bird v. Parsons, 289 F.3d 865, 877-78 (6th Cir.2002) (when a domain name is used to indicate an address on the Internet, and not to identify the source of goods and services, it is not functioning as a trademark); U-Haul, 279 F.Supp.2d at 727-28. The cases cited by plaintiffs (Plaintiffs’ Reply Mem. pp. 1-2) do not support their argument that the inclusion of URLs in the WhenU directory constitutes the use of a trademark under the Lanham Act. In Eli Lilly & Co. v. Natural Answers, Inc., 233 F.3d 456, 465 (7th Cir.200 2 F.Supp.2d 1029 (N.D.Ill.2001)(<HOLDING>); Bihari v. Gross, 119 F.Supp.2d 309, 322-23 Options: A. holding that use of plaintiffs trade name as metatag in defendants website was a permissible fair use as metatag simply described defendants and the content of their website B. holding that there is nothing improper about the use of a trademark to communicate that goods bearing that mark were actually sold on defendants website C. holding that use of metatags constitutes use in commerce but finding no trademark violation because defendants only used mark in metatag to fairly identify the content of his websites and did so in good faith that is without the intention of capitalizing on the plaintiffs reputation and goodwill D. holding that an unspecified number of complaints posted on the defendants website was insufficient to show that the defendant had knowledge of an alleged defect E. holding that there is nothing improper with defendants purchase of sponsored links when defendants actually sell plaintiffs products on their website

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that use of plaintiffs trade name as metatag in defendants website was a permissible fair use as metatag simply described defendants and the content of their website
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Stockholder shall execute and/or cause to be delivered to Parent such instruments and other documents and shall take such other actions as Parent may reasonably request for the purpose of carrying out the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

assistant: Further Assurances
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each of Ashland Global and Valvoline shall consult with the other, and shall, subject to the requirements of Section 7.08, provide the other Party the opportunity to review and comment upon, any press releases or other public statements in connection with the Separation, the Initial Public Offering, the Distribution or the Other Disposition or any of the other transactions contemplated hereby and any filings with any Governmental Authority or national securities exchange with respect thereto, in each case prior to the issuance or filing thereof, as applicable (including the IPO Registration Statement, the Parties’ respective Current Reports on Form 8-K to be filed on the Distribution Date, the Parties’ respective Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with respect to the fiscal quarter during which the Distribution Date occurs, or if such quarter is the fourth fiscal quarter, the Parties’ respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K filed with respect to the fiscal year during which the Distribution Date occurs (each such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Annual Report on Form 10-K, a “ First Post-Distribution Report ”)). Each Party’s obligations pursuant to this Section 12.07 shall terminate on the date on which such Party’s First Post-Distribution Report is filed with the Commission.

assistant: Publicity
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: {11} As we have noted, the County’s obligation to provide Officer Gutierrez a defense and/or indemnification arises only if he is a “public employee” of a “governmental entity.” And the TCA defines “public employee” to include law enforcement officers. Section 41-4-3(F)(2). In relevant part, Section 41 -4-3 (D) more precisely defines a “law enforcement officer” as a full-time salaried public employee of a governmental entity, or a certified part-time salaried police officer employed by a governmental entity, whose principal duties under law are to hold in custody any person accused of a criminal offense, to maintain public order or to make arrests for crimes].] Our courts have construed this definition strictly. See, e.g., Silva v. State, 1987-NMSC-107, ¶ 17, 106 N.M. 472, 745 P.2d 380 (<HOLDING>); Coyazo v. State, 1995-NMCA-056, ¶¶ 14-19, 120 Options: A. holding that the secretary of corrections is not a law enforcement officer under the tca B. holding corrections officers are not law enforcement officers under 41412 C. holding that court could properly infer that veteran officer believed there was a violation of the law based on his long experience with law enforcement D. holding attempted aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer is not a crime in florida E. holding that the written job description alone was insufficient to establish that an animal control officer is a law enforcement officer under the tca

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that the secretary of corrections is not a law enforcement officer under the tca
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All notices, demands, requests, consents, approvals, and other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and, unless otherwise specified herein, shall be (i) personally served, (ii) deposited in the mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, (iii) delivered by reputable air courier service with charges prepaid, or (iv) transmitted by hand delivery, telegram, or facsimile, addressed as set forth below or to such other address as such party shall have specified most recently by written notice. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be deemed effective (a) upon hand delivery or delivery by facsimile, with accurate confirmation generated by the transmitting facsimile machine, at the address or number designated below (if delivered on a business day during normal business hours where such notice is to be received), or the first business day following such delivery (if delivered other than on a business day during normal business hours where such notice is to be received) or (b) on the second business day following the date of mailing by express courier service, fully prepaid, addressed to such address, or upon actual receipt of such mailing, whichever shall first occur. The addresses for such communications shall be: (i) if to the Company to: Greenwood Hall, Inc., 6230 Wilshire Blvd., #136, Los Angeles, California 90048-5126, Attn: William Bradfield, CEO, email: bbradfield@greenwoodhall.com, with a copy by fax only to (which shall not constitute notice): [RC] and (ii) if to the Purchasers, to: the addresses and fax numbers indicated on the signature pages hereto, with an additional copy by fax only to (which shall not constitute notice): Grushko & Mittman, P.C., 515 Rockaway Avenue, Valley Stream, New York 11581, Attn: Eliezer Drew, Esq., facsimile: (212) 697-3575.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Diamond Resorts Party owns or licenses or otherwise has the right to use all licenses, permits, trademarks, trademark applications, patents, patent applications, service marks, tradenames, copyrights, copyright applications, franchises, authorizations and other intellectual property rights that are necessary for the operation of its businesses, without infringement upon or conflict with the rights of any other Person with respect thereto, except for such infringements and conflicts which, individually or in the aggregate, are not reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Intellectual Property
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the following Terms of Service clause and list all applicable unfairness categories. If none apply, answer with None. Clause: app provider and its subsidiaries are third-party beneficiaries of these terms as related to your license of the app , and that , upon your acceptance of the terms and conditions of these terms , app provider will have the right ( and will be deemed to have accepted the right ) to enforce these terms as related to your license of the app against you as a third-party beneficiary thereof .

assistant: None
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Cash Collateral (or the appropriate portion thereof) provided to reduce Fronting Exposure or to secure other obligations shall be released promptly following (i) the elimination of the applicable Fronting Exposure or other obligations giving rise thereto (including by the termination of Defaulting Lender status of the applicable Lender (or, as appropriate, its assignee following compliance with Section 11.06(b)(vi) )) or (ii) the determination by the Administrative Agent and the applicable L/C Issuer that there exists excess Cash Collateral; provided , however , (x) any such release shall be without prejudice to, and any disbursement or other transfer of Cash Collateral shall be and remain subject to, any other Lien conferred under the Loan Documents and the other applicable provisions of the Loan Documents, and (y) the Person providing Cash Collateral and the applicable L/C Issuer may agree that Cash Collateral shall not be released but instead held to support future anticipated Fronting Exposure or other obligations.

assistant: Releases
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Each Granting Party shall remain liable for any deficiency if the proceeds of any sale or other disposition of the Security Collateral are insufficient to pay in full, the Loans and, to the extent then due and owing, all other Obligations of such Granting Party and the reasonable fees and disbursements of any attorneys employed by the U.S. ABL Collateral Agent or any other Secured Party to collect such deficiency.

assistant: Waivers
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: 478 U.S. 675, 684, 106 S.Ct. 3159, 3165, 92 L. Ed.2d 549, 559 (1986). Moreover, we agree with the trial court that there is little doubt that, in the context of a boarding school, the school effectively acted as the “household” within which the abusive conduct occurred. The school acted in a parental capacity to the students within its care, providing for them necessary shelter, food, education, recreation, and succor. Its control over and duty of care for the students housed within its confines did not markedly differ from that assumed by parents. See Dale v. Boy Scouts of Am., 160 N.J. 562, 602, 734 A.2d 1196 (1999), rev’d on other grounds, 530 U.S. 640, 120 S.Ct. 2446, 147 L. Ed.2d 554 (2000). Compare Smith v. Estate of Kelly, 343 N.J.Super. 480, 502, 778 A.2d 1162 (App.Div.2001) (<HOLDING>). In a very real sense, the school and its Options: A. holding that requiring church to make contributions to workers compensation fund opposed by such church did not violate first amendment B. holding that the catholic church was not within a parishioners household C. holding church services constitute property within meaning of 548 D. holding that denial of tax exemption for part of church property that was not necessary for occupancy and enjoyment of church did not violate first amendment E. holding that irs examination of corporate minute books of a church to determine whether it qualified for tax exemption was not unconstitutional interference with religious affairs of the church under the first amendment

assistant: The best answer is B. holding that the catholic church was not within a parishioners household
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: specific securities.” 241 F.Supp.2d at 220; see also id. at 221-22. In fact, the complaint specifically alleges that defendants’ misrepresentations about the source of their investment advice were intended to and did cause plaintiffs and the putative class members to pay premium brokerage commissions — commissions which accrued only upon the purchase or sale of securities. We held in Dabit that such claims are preempted by SLUSA because they allege misstatements “in connection with” the purchase or sale of securities as that term was interpreted by the Supreme Court in SEC v. Zandford, 535 U.S. 813, 122 S.Ct. 1899, 153 L.Ed.2d 1 (2002). See Dabit, 395 F.3d at 48-49 (citing Zandford, 535 U.S. at 820, 825); accord Rowinski v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., 398 F.3d 294, 299-300 (3d Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). The contract and negligence claims fare no Options: A. holding that a claim arises from the purchase or sale of a security only if there is an allegation of fraud in the purchase sale or issuance of the instrument B. holding that a plaintiff alleging securities fraud must show that a defendant 1 made a material misrepresentation or a material omission as to which he or she had a duty to speak 2 with scienter 3 in connection with the purchase or sale of securities C. holding that the basic elements of section 10b and rule 10b5 claims are 1 a material misrepresentation or omission 2 scienter ie a wrongful state of mind 3 a connection with the purchase or sale of a security 4 reliance often referred to in cases involving public securities markets fraudonthemarket cases as transaction causation 5 economic loss and 6 loss causation ie a causal connection between the material misrepresentation and the loss internal citations omitted D. holding that slusa preempts claims which allege a material misrepresentation or omission in connection with the purchase or sale of securities whether or not that allegation is an element of or otherwise necessary to the putative state claim E. holding breach of best execution duty is a material misrepresentation in connection with the purchase or sale of the securities

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that slusa preempts claims which allege a material misrepresentation or omission in connection with the purchase or sale of securities whether or not that allegation is an element of or otherwise necessary to the putative state claim
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of the Due Process Clause and may be enforced only to the extent consistent with those principles. IV Applying the Due Process Clause’s jurisdictional principles to these facts does not present a difficult issue. The insurance contracts at issue were entered in Germany between German parties under German law. They addressed German events. Any breach of the contracts occurred in Germany. The parties to the contracts had no connection with Florida. The events governed by the contracts had no connection with Florida. The grounds for exercising jurisdiction over these parties or these events in Florida are exactly none. Many cases recognize a state’s lack of jurisdiction over such extra-territorial contracts. See, e.g., Home Ins. Co. v. Dick, 281 U.S. 397, 50 S.Ct. 338, 74 L.Ed. 926 (1930) (<HOLDING>); Francosteel Corp. v. M/V Charm, 19 F.3d 624 Options: A. holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law not arizona law should be applied B. holding that texas district court had subjectmatter jurisdiction over paternity proceeding regarding minor born in texas and taken to mexico by mother a mexican citizen one day before putative father commenced paternity action C. holding that a texas statute could not be applied to invalidate an insurance policy that had been issued in mexico to a mexican citizen that was to be performed in mexico D. holding that the place of performance governs the legality of the contract and because the contract was to be performed in mexico texas public policy against gambling was not implicated E. holding that in order for claim to be within scope of coverage of title insurance policy it must be specifically provided for

assistant: The best answer is C. holding that a texas statute could not be applied to invalidate an insurance policy that had been issued in mexico to a mexican citizen that was to be performed in mexico
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Holder acknowledges and agrees that (i) certain of the information contained herein, including the existence and terms of this Agreement, is of a confidential nature and constitutes material non-public information under United States federal securities laws, (ii) United States federal securities laws prohibit any person who has received material non-public information relating to the Issuer from purchasing or selling securities of the Issuer, or from communicating such information to any person under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that such person is likely to purchase or sell securities of the Issuer, and (iii) until such time as any such non-public information has been adequately disseminated to the public, Holder shall not purchase or sell any securities of the Issuer, or communicate such information to any other person or entity, other than its personal financial and legal advisors for the sole purpose of evaluating the entering into and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

assistant: Confidentiality
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: that his experts meet the standard of reliability required of expert scientific testimony pursuant to the Alberico factors. See Muse v. Muse, 2009-NMCA-003, ¶ 72, 145 N.M. 451, 200 P.3d 104 (“We will not search the record for facts, arguments, and rulings in order to support generalized arguments.”). {27} It was Mr. Firstenberg’s burden, in the district court, to show that his experts, including his treating physician, Dr. Elliott, were qualified to present scientific expert testimony as to the cause of his EMS symptoms. See Parkhill, 2010-NMCA-110, ¶ 20 (stating that a treating physician must be qualified pursuant to the Alberico factors in order to present scientific expert testimony as to the external causation of the patient’s symptoms); id. ¶ 54 (Vigil, J., specially concurring) (<HOLDING>). The district court, having reviewed the Options: A. recognizing that it is the proponents burden to demonstrate the admissibility of expert scientific testimony B. recognizing burden C. holding that the admissibility of expert testimony was governed by state law D. holding that the burden of laying the proper foundation for the admission of the expert testimony is on the party offering the expert and admissibility must be shown by a preponderance of the evidence E. holding that trial courts are gatekeepers in determining fitness of scientific expert testimony for admissibility at trial

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing that it is the proponents burden to demonstrate the admissibility of expert scientific testimony
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: All questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of the PSUs and the 2012 Stock Plan shall be governed and construed according to the laws of the state of Delaware, without regard to the application of the conflicts of laws provisions thereof. Any disputes regarding the PSUs or the 2012 Stock Plan shall be brought only in the state or federal courts of the state of Delaware.

assistant: Governing Laws
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as disclosed in writing to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders prior to the Effective Date or otherwise disclosed in the Borrower’s public filings made prior to the Effective Date (other than any such disclosure in the “Risk Factors” section of such public filings or in any other forward-looking statements contained therein), no litigation, investigation or proceeding of or before any arbitrator or Governmental Authority is pending or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, threatened in writing by or against any Loan Party or against any of their respective properties or revenues that, in the aggregate, would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

assistant: Litigations
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: The Company will use the proceeds from the sale of the Common Shares as described in the Prospectus Supplement, but not, directly or indirectly, for (i) except as set forth on Schedule 4(g), the satisfaction of any indebtedness of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) the redemption or repurchase of any securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or (iii) the settlement of any outstanding litigation.

assistant: Use Of Proceeds
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: (a)(i) The audited consolidated balance sheets of the Parent and its Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2011 and the unaudited consolidated balance sheets of the Parent and its Subsidiaries as at June 30, 2012 and the related consolidated statements of operations and of cash flows for the fiscal years or quarters, as the case may be, ended on such dates, reported on by and accompanied by, in the case of the annual financial statements, an unqualified report from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, present fairly in all material respects the consolidated financial condition of the Parent and its Subsidiaries as at such date, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for the respective fiscal years or quarters, as the case may be, then ended. All such financial statements, including the related schedules and notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied consistently throughout the periods involved (except as approved by the aforementioned firm of accountants and disclosed therein).

assistant: Financial Statements
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: To the fullest extent permitted by law, each party hereto hereby irrevocably consents and agrees, for the benefit of each party, that any legal action, suit or proceeding against it with respect to its obligations, liabilities or any other matter under or arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, shall be brought in any city, state or federal court located in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York (the “ Designated Courts ”), and hereby irrevocably accepts and submits to the jurisdiction of the Designated Courts (and of the appropriate appellate courts) of each such Designated Court with respect to any such action, suit or proceeding. Each party hereto also hereby irrevocably consents and agrees, for the benefit of each other party, that any legal action, suit or proceeding against it shall be brought in any Designated Court, and hereby irrevocably accepts and submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of each such Designated Court with respect to any such action, suit or proceeding. Each party hereto waives any objection which it may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any of the aforesaid actions, suits or proceedings brought in any such Designated Court and hereby further waives and agrees not to plead or claim in any such Designated Court that any such action, suit or proceeding brought therein has been brought in an inconvenient forum. Each party agrees that (i) to the fullest extent permitted by law, service of process may be effectuated hereinafter by mailing a copy of the summons and complaint or other pleading by certified mail, return receipt requested, at its address set forth above and (ii) all Notices that are required to be given hereunder may be given by the attorneys for the respective parties.

assistant: Consent To Jurisdiction
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: two problems with this view. As Judge Lansing pointed out in Gillihan I, the first is that: The opening words of subsection (1) make it clear that it does not apply in cases that are subject to subsection (4), and the opening words of subsection (4) establish that it governs “[i]n actions for personal injury, where the amount of plaintiffs claim for damages does not exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,-000).” Gillihan I at 696, 99 P.3d at 1086. The two subsections do not govern together in personal injury actions, and to read them as though they do, as Gonzalez points out, is to edit the statutory language of I.C. § 12-120. The plurality’s interpretation is strained, and both parties in this case have agreed ural High School Dist. No. 1, 34 Idaho 222, 224, 200 P. 138, 140 (1921) (<HOLDING>); Beker Industries Inc. v. Georgetown Irr. Options: A. holding legislatures removal of language allowing director to approve change in nature of water use prior to bills passage can only be interpreted as intent that director not have that power B. holding removal of word unanimous from bill prior to passage demonstrates legislative intent to change law from requiring board unanimity to segregate school districts to requiring only majority C. recognizing that statutes requiring intent are not likely to be invalidated because of vagueness D. holding change of word shall to may prior to bills passage indicates legislative intent to make purchases upon bids permissive rather than mandatory E. holding that determining legislative intent is a question of law

assistant: The best answer is B. holding removal of word unanimous from bill prior to passage demonstrates legislative intent to change law from requiring board unanimity to segregate school districts to requiring only majority
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: support a suppression court’s finding that an officer possessed reasonable suspicion to believe that a violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 4524(c) has occurred, the officer must articulate at least some fact or facts to support his inference or conclusion that the object materially impaired the driver’s view. Our consideration of other sections of the Motor Vehicle Code informs our conclusion. For example, in order to independently assess whether a police officer had reasonable suspicion to suspect a violation of Section 3361 (Driving vehicle at a safe speed), a suppression court would require more than a single statement from an officer that a motorist was driving “at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent.” 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3361; see Commonwealth v. Perry, 982 A.2d 1009 (Pa.Super.2009) (<HOLDING>). Similarly, we question how a suppression Options: A. holding that trial court properly determined that police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop appellants vehicle based on suspected violation of section 3361 where officer testified that appellant was driving fifteen miles over the 25 mph speed limit and the road was wet and slushy B. holding that a conclusion that reasonable suspicion supported the stop of a vehicle was subsumed within the trial courts ruling that the officer had probable cause for the stop C. holding that the initial stop by officer was based on reasonable suspicion that defendant was impersonating a police officer although another officer arrested defendant for privacy act violation D. holding that notwithstanding the officers testimony that he had no suspicion of criminality the officer was aware of facts that would give rise to reasonable suspicion in the mind of a reasonable officer E. holding that a police officer may stop a driver where the officer has a reasonable and articulable suspicion regarding the commission of a civil traffic violation

assistant: The best answer is A. holding that trial court properly determined that police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop appellants vehicle based on suspected violation of section 3361 where officer testified that appellant was driving fifteen miles over the 25 mph speed limit and the road was wet and slushy
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: In Carpenter v. Chrysler Corp., 853 S.W.2d 346 (Mo.App.1993), the appellants brought suit against an automobile dealership alleging, inter alia, fraudulent misrepresentation for the dealership’s failure to disclose certain repairs it had made to the vehicle in which they purchased. Id. at 351. On appeal, the appellants claimed, inter alia, that the trial court erred in refusing to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury. Id. at 364. The appellate court agreed, holding that “the jury could reasonably infer that [the dealership’s omissions] were taken with reckless indifference to the rights of the [appellants] or were evil, motivated solely by [its] desire to make a sale regardless of the repairs [it] had undertaken but had not disclosed.” Id.; see also Chong, 361 F.3d at 459 (<HOLDING>). Likewise, in the case at bar, it seems Options: A. holding a court may not award punitive damages B. holding that conduct must be beyond the fraud which supported compensatory damages to award punitive damages C. holding that an award for punitive damages must be supported by clear unequivocal and convincing evidence D. holding that punitive damages are available in an intentional discrimination action even if the jury does not assess compensatory damages E. holding that sellers intentional misrepresentation sufficiently supported assessment of punitive damages against it

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that sellers intentional misrepresentation sufficiently supported assessment of punitive damages against it
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: explained in a case involving the shooting of a fleeing motorist, “the law ... has been vague on whether the potential risk to unknown third parties is sufficient to justify the use of force nearly certain to cause death.” Cordova, 569 F.3d at 1193 (emphasis added). Because no one “has identified a single case predating the conduct at issue that prohibits [ramming a car] in a materially similar context,” and because I believe that these cases demonstrate that Davis’s actions “at best fell in the hazy border between excessive and acceptable force,” the Plaintiff has failed to show that Davis’s conduct was prohibited by clearly-established law. Lyons v. City of Xenia, 417 F.3d 565, 579 (6th Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Cordova, 569 F.3d at 1193 (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added). Accordingly, I respectfully Options: A. holding that where police officers had stopped a vehicle because they suspected that the motorist was intoxicated irrespective of whether the deputies were justified in detaining the motorist after he showed no signs of intoxication and even if they had not after approaching the motorist observed conditions raising a reasonable and articulable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot they were entitled to ask the motorist for permission to search his vehicle B. holding that a fleeing motorist was not seized for fourth amendment purposes until the law enforcement officers were successful in stopping the motorist at a roadblock C. holding term third party did not include an uninsured motorist carrier D. holding that police officers are entitled to conduct an investigatory stop of a motorist if they have reasonable suspicion that the motorist has committed a traffic violation E. holding that because the law in this area is unclear an officer who shot a fleeing motorist was not unreasonable in believing that a potential threat to third parties would justify shooting the motorist

assistant: The best answer is E. holding that because the law in this area is unclear an officer who shot a fleeing motorist was not unreasonable in believing that a potential threat to third parties would justify shooting the motorist
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: Courts have split regarding whether searches conducted for reasons other than institutional safety violate the Fourth Amendment. The Second Circuit has held that the Supreme Court’s rationale in Hudson applies only to searches for institutional purposes, not to searches initiated by prosecutors outside the prison “solely to obtain information for a superseding indictment.” United States v. Cohen, 7 on decision holds more broadly that inmates per se lack any Fourth Amendment privacy rights in their cells and lockers. See United States v. Reece, 797 F.Supp. 843, 846 (D.Colo.1992) (concluding that a prisoner has no expectation of privacy in his cell, and lacks Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure); State v. Martin, 322 N.C. 229, 367 S.E.2d 618, 621-22 (1988) (<HOLDING>); see also State v. Betterley, 191 Wis.2d 407, Options: A. holding contrary to the second districts reasoning in mccoy 639 so2d 163 that pretrial detainees lack any expectation of privacy so the fourth amendment does not protect them from cell searches B. recognizing that a modern cell phone is a computer and not just another purse or address book so that the potential invasion of privacy in a search of a cell phone is greater than in a search of a container in a conventional sense C. holding the defendant lacked any expectation of privacy in his cell so the jailer had the right to inspect anything in his cell D. holding seizure of arrestees cell phone lawful but finding the fourth amendment requires a warrant to perform a forensic search of the lawfully seized cell phone E. recognizing record supported determination that defendant lacked expectation of privacy in house

assistant: The best answer is C. holding the defendant lacked any expectation of privacy in his cell so the jailer had the right to inspect anything in his cell
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, the Parties shall each bear their own legal fees, accounting fees and other costs and expenses with respect to the negotiation, execution and the delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transaction hereunder.

assistant: Expenses
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Borrower Agent may request, convert or continue Loans, select interest rates and transfer funds based on telephonic instructions or e-mailed instructions to Agent, in each case to be confirmed in accordance with this Section 4.1.4 . Borrower Agent shall confirm each such request by prompt delivery to Agent of a Notice of Borrowing or Notice of Conversion/Continuation, if applicable, but if it differs materially from the action taken by Agent or Lenders, the records of Agent and Lenders shall govern. Neither Agent nor any Lender shall have any liability for any loss suffered by a Borrower as a result of Agent or any Lender acting upon its understanding of telephonic or e-mailed instructions from a person believed in good faith by Agent or any Lender to be a person authorized to give such instructions on Borrower Agent’s behalf.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Any notice provided for in this Agreement must be in writing and must be either personally delivered, delivered by overnight courier, or mailed by first class mail, to Grantee at the address set forth on the records of the Company, to the Company at its offices at 120 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603, or such other address or to the attention of such other person as the recipient party shall have specified by prior written notice to the sending party. Any notice under this Agreement will be deemed to have been given when received.

assistant: Notices
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: of his supervised release during an appeal of the revocation of supervised release). Brimm contends that the district court abused its discretion when it imposed a special condition of supervised release which forbid him from using a computer with access to any on-line services, except for use with his employment and after the approval of the probation officer, because the condition constitutes an unwarranted occupational restriction. The district court did not abuse its discretion because the condition does not interfere with Brimm’s employment. See United States v. Rearden, 349 F.3d 608, 621-22 (9th Cir.2003). We also reject Brimm’s contention that the district court impermissibly delegated its authority to the probation office when it imposed the challenged condition. Cf. id. at 619 (<HOLDING>) Appeal No. 08-10008, DISMISSED. Appeal No. Options: A. recognizing that probation officers are mandated to enforce a sentencing courts terms and conditions of supervised release B. holding that district courts have the authority to order terms of supervised release following reimprisonment C. holding that further supervised release may be ordered as a sentence for violation of supervised release D. holding that defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether terms of supervised release have been violated E. recognizing district courts wide latitude in imposing supervised release conditions

assistant: The best answer is A. recognizing that probation officers are mandated to enforce a sentencing courts terms and conditions of supervised release
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: Reference is hereby made to the Financing Agreement for a statement of the terms thereof. All terms used in this Agreement which are defined therein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings herein as set forth therein.

assistant: Definitions
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the legal provision and list the applicable contract clause categories. Provision: On each Closing Date, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein, substantially concurrent with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company and the applicable Purchasers, the Company agrees to sell, and each Purchaser, severally and not jointly with the other Purchasers (as the case may be), agrees to purchase, the Securities indicated on such Purchaser’s signature page hereto. Prior to each Closing Date, each Purchaser shall deliver to the Escrow Agent, via wire transfer or a certified check, in immediately available funds equal to such Purchaser’s Subscription Amount as set forth on the signature page hereto executed by such Purchaser, and the Company shall deliver to each Purchaser its respective Shares and Warrants, as determined pursuant to Section 2.3(a), and the Company and each Purchaser shall deliver the other items set forth in Section 2.3 deliverable at the applicable Closing. Upon satisfaction of the covenants and conditions set forth in Sections 2.2 and 2.3, the applicable Closing shall occur at the offices of the Company’s Counsel or such other location as the parties shall mutually agree, including remotely via the delivery of electronic Closing documents.

assistant: Closings
system: You are a legal assistant. Answer concisely and accurately. When legal text is provided, rely on it and do not invent facts.

user: Read the case excerpt and choose the best holding from the options. Case excerpt: at trial, so as to provide the trial court an opportunity to make a final ruling on the matter in the context in which the evidence is introduced, results in waiver of the error on appeal. Brown, 783 N.E.2d at 1125. Consequently, Leo also waived this argument. Waiver notwithstanding, Indiana courts have not addressed the admissibility of a guardian ad litem's opinion. In actions for child custody or modification, the trial court is permitted by statute to order an investigation by a guardian ad litem, and the guardian ad litem's report: "(1) may be received in evidence at the hearing; and (2) may not be excluded on the grounds that the report is hearsay or otherwise incompetent." Ind.Code § 31-17 2-12 (1998). Further, the statute provides that the guardian ad litem may be cal 2) (<HOLDING>). We need not decide this issue today because, Options: A. holding that guardian ad litem and psychologist fees incurred in child custody proceedings and ordered to be paid directly to the guardian ad litem and psychologist were nondischargeable under 523a5 B. holding the district court properly allowed guardian ad litem fees to be taxed as costs C. holding that guardian ad litems extensive advice to plaintiffs attorney and daily involvement in case exceeded formal role of guardian ad litem D. holding that the trial court did not err by permitting the guardian ad litem to give his recommendation or by relying on the guardian ad litems recommendation as the recommendation was supported by evidence received at trial E. holding the trial court had jurisdiction where summons was served on the attorney advocate for the juveniles guardian ad litem

assistant: The best answer is D. holding that the trial court did not err by permitting the guardian ad litem to give his recommendation or by relying on the guardian ad litems recommendation as the recommendation was supported by evidence received at trial