Original sentence: Academic studies and public debate have analysed whether there is an ideological bias on Wikipedia, or to what extent the encyclopedia successfully adheres to its policies on neutrality.As a result, Conservapedia was founded as an alternative English-language wiki encyclopedia, written from an intentionally American conservative viewpoint, although it has been largely derided online.Collectively, findings show that Wikipedia articles edited by large numbers of editors with opposing ideological views are at least as neutral as other similar sources, but articles with fewer edits by a smaller number of ideologically homogeneous contributors were more likely to reflect editorial bias.Examination of editor affiliation with the major U.These have examined article content, as well as the demographics of contributors, and the nature of their preferences and interactions.political parties showed some variation in editing preferences with regard to the distribution of the most heavily edited articles, and no preference for politically similar editors in discussing article content, despite a preference with interacting with politically similar editors in more personal communication
Edited sentence: Academic studies have analysed whether there is ideological bias on Wikipedia.Collectively, their findings show that Wikipedia articles edited by large numbers of editors with opposing views are at least as neutral as other sources, but articles with fewer edits written by smaller groups of ideologically homogeneous editors were more likely to reflect the editors' bias.Conservapedia is an English-language wiki encyclopedia project written from an American conservative point of view; compared to Wikipedia's roughly 5.6 million articles in the English language alone, Conservapedia has 46,000.Disagreements between editors often arise while working on entries about how to approach this goal, which can lead to heated arguments and accusations of "POV pushing" (insertion of certain points of view to an unfair degree).Mainstream sources are generally dismissive of these projects.One of the core principles of Wikipedia is its stated goal of creating topic entries with a "neutral point of view" (NPOV) where all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, are fairly represented in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.The process of discussion around these issues often provides a constructive framework for more viewpoints to be expressed and incorporated