Original sentence: Chabad writers counter that these reactions are based on a misunderstanding of the Kabbalistic terminology used by Schneerson, and that similar expressions can be found throughout non-Chabad Hassidic literature.In recent years some critics, notably Berger, Keller and others, have expressed the concern that this is a Chabad innovation that deifies the Rebbe, which whould be contrary to accepted Jewish theology.Therefore by a Hassid, he with the Rebbe with God are all one... Therefore one can not ask a question about an intermediary since this is the essence of God Himself, as He has clothed Himself in a human body"
Edited sentence: Therefore by a Hassid, he with the Rebbe with God are all one...Therefore one can not ask a question about an intermediary since this is the essence of God Himself, as He has clothed Himself in a human body" In recent years this has been critised by many Mitnagdim, including Berger, Keller and others, because it as in most Kabbalistic concepts may mistakenly be taken literally which whould then be contrary to what Judaism believes in