Original sentence: A review article entitled "Watching the Watchdogs at Quackwatch" by Joel M.His article in JSE examines eight Quackwatch articles for factuality, fairness and scientific currency
Edited sentence: "It remains a mystery how they and I have interpreted the same body of medical science and reached such divergent conclusions.....It is very probable that many of the 2,300,000 vistors to the website have been misled by the trappings of scientific objectivity.A critical and selective website review entitled "Watching the Watchdogs at Quackwatch" by Joel M.His article in JSE examines eight Quackwatch articles for factuality, fairness and scientific currency and found them to be "contaminated with incomplete data, obsolete data, technical errors, unsupported opinions, and/or innuendo" and gives numerous examples with extensive, peer reviewed references.Kauffman concludes that: