Original sentence: For balance in this generally pro-VC article, please see.Other members of the cycling community such a lane and path cyclists feel that their rights are violated by the intolerance shown by VC advocates.They point out that the VC movement is attempting to keep entire city grids as free of bike lanes as possible, overlooking the needs and interest of the much larger cycling community that favours them
Edited sentence: An example of the practical consequences; bicycle lanes oblige a bicyclist going straight at an intersection to do so while next to the curb, whereas a vehicular cyclist would position themselves away from the curb where a motorist would.Drivers primarily look for traffic approaching from the proper direction, and are less likely to see traffic approaching the other way.In small countries with high population density centers, practical and economic factors that inhibit the use of motoring, and relatively short typical trip distances, such as the Netherlands and Denmark, segregated cycle facilities are highly developed and cyclists using them are safer per km traveled than cyclists using roadways in the USA and UK.Similarly, bike paths and bike lanes that are on only one side of the road encourage wrong-way riding, producing two predictable results:.Some VC advocates oppose Segregated cycle facilities because such government sanctioned segregation discourages cyclists from integrating themselves into traffic while encouraging the belief that someone cycling has less of a right to travel than someone motoring.collisions between left-turning drivers and bicyclists going the wrong way.head-on collisions between two bicyclists who both think they have the right of way