Original sentence: " When the interviewer inquired "Why make the suggestion [referring to Rich]." WikiLeaks offered a $20,000 reward for information about Rich's murder.", Assange replied "Because we have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States.Assange spoke about sources bringing information to WikiLeaks in the context of Seth Rich in an interview with Nieuwsuur, and stated that whistleblowers are at risk.But if there is any question about a source of WikiLeaks being threatened, then people can be assured that this organization will go after anyone who may have been involved in some kind of attempt to coerce or possibly, in this case, kill a potential source.In July 2016, in an interview with Megyn Kelly, Assange stated no confirmation or refutation that Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was murdered that month, was the source behind the DNC emails that WikiLeaks published by saying "We're not saying that Seth Rich's death necessarily is connected to our publications – that's something that needs to be established.When the interviewer suggested that Rich died as a result of "just a robbery", Assange said "No
Edited sentence: Assange spoke about sources bringing information to WikiLeaks in the context of Seth Rich, and stated that whistle-blowers are at risk.In a July 2016 interview, Assange implied that Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was murdered by an unknown assailant earlier that year, was the source behind the DNC emails that WikiLeaks published and that Seth Rich was killed for doing so.When an interviewer said that Rich died as a result of "just a robbery", Assange said "No.WikiLeaks offered a $20,000 reward for information about Rich’s murder