Original sentence: A third issue, particular to Christianity, is whether hell is actually populated, or if God will ultimately "restore all things" (apokatastasis) at the end of the world.Criticisms of the doctrine of hell can focus on the intensity or eternity of its torments, and arguments surrounding all these issues can invoke appeals to the omnipotence, omniscience and omnibenevolence of God.However, hell is not seen as strictly a matter of retributive justice even by the more traditionalist churches.In the Abrahamic religions, hell has traditionally been regarded as a punishment for wrong-doing or sin in this life, as a manifestation of divine justice.Nonetheless, the extreme severity or infinite duration of the punishment might be seen as incompatible with justice.Some people will be penalized by God with everlasting punishment.The existence of hell might be considered incompatible with justice or divine mercy.The first is whether the existence of hell is compatible with justice.The problem consists in reconciling the assumed attributes of God, particularly omnibenevolence, with the existence of a place of eternal torment.The second is whether it is compatible with God's infinite mercy, especially as articulated in Christianity.There are several major issues to the problem of hell
Edited sentence: However, the view of hell as "punishment" is not universal.Some people (only the slaves of sin) will remain a bride unto Sheol forever, and death will be their everlasting punishment.The debate mostly focuses on whether God would want to allow a situation where some people are consigned to Hell forever.There is also the question of why an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God would allow the creation of souls foreknowing those souls would end up in Hell.While Hell has traditionally been regarded as a punishment for wrong-doing or sin in life, the problem arises primarily from the severity of the punishment, if Hell is indeed seen as eternal torture