Original sentence: Becuase it attempts to separate God and Law, some have seen this Ikeda/Jeffrey argument as a classic case of Affirming_a_disjunct.Besides making clear the flaw in the third assumption (how could WindowsXP run on a computer that couldn't support WindowsXP.Of course, this logic is deeply flawed and results in a flawed conclusion
Edited sentence: Becuase it attempts to separate God and Law, some have seen the Ikeda/Jeffrey argument as a classic case of Affirming_a_disjunct.Besides making clear the quandry in the third assumption (how could WindowsXP run on a computer that couldn't support WindowsXP