Original sentence: The article ethics in the Bible is a survey of ethics in the Hebrew Bible and in the New Testament
Edited sentence: A particularly harsh critic, Friedrich Nietzsche, called the Christian ethics a "slave ethics" for counselling submission to enslavers, invaders, authority.As Nietzsche's example shows, this is not always a direct connection - it may be reactive or even dismissive.Ethics in the Bible is a survey of ethics in the Hebrew Bible and in the New Testament.However, even among religious scholars, significant differences of opinion in the applicability, or how to interpret and apply passages in the books of the Bible lead to different understandings of ethics.In some ways the futility question is illustrated well by this situation:  as Catholic philosophers debated and deplored the rape and extermination and enslavement of the peoples of the New World, it continued without limit, especially in South America, often with the participation of the Church.Of course, it very often protected native converts and shielded them from harm, where it could.See Roman Catholicism's relations with governments.See the article on Genesis of Ethics for this view, and the section below on Global Ethics.The Mussar Movement is a Jewish movement to revive this scholarly tradition.There is also a distinct modern study of ethics from the Bible which are not there directly stated, but implied or suggested.This reflects the reality that even millenia later, a deep connection exists between the ethics of the Bible and the ethics of the great western philosophers.Thus, one should not expect to find any direct correlation between Biblical ethics and post-Enlightenment philosophical study of ethics, nor should one find no correlation at all, either