Original sentence: Again, although there is debate on the subject, both amongst scholars and adherents to the Abrahamic religions (i.Although there is some debate amongst historical scholars, for instance with those scholars who hold to a Mosaic authorship of the Torah, , many modern scholars have concluded that the Exodus narrative is a composite account composed long after the events described.Christianity, Islam, and Judaism), many scholars do not consider the Exodus to be a completely historical event, at least not in the modern sense, but rather was conceived as a theological tale set against an historical background, illustrating how God of Israel acted to save and strengthen his chosen people, the Children of Israel,
Edited sentence: While the overall intent of the narrative is historical, it is not history in the modern sense, but as a theology set against a historical background, illustrating how the God of Israel acted to save and strengthen his chosen people, the Children of Israel, and that it is therefore inappropriate to approach miraculous events such as the burning bush and the plagues of Egypt as if they were actual history.With the exception of those conservative scholars who insist on Mosaic authorship of the Torah, scholars agree that the Exodus account is a composite literary construct, composed and edited from smaller units transmitted over centuries to achieve theological and historical coherence