Original sentence: As such irreducible complexity is seen as an example of creationist pseudoscience.Irreducible complexity is rejected by the majority of the scientific community.The main concerns with the concept is that it utilises an argument from ignorance, that Behe fails to provide a testable hypothesis, and that there is a lack of evidence in support of the concept
Edited sentence: Irreducible complexity is something that does not seem to be going away, and that poses a mystery to the scientific community -- which is at a loss on how to explain such complex structural machinery as DNA >> RNA >> ribosome information transfer (in order to make proteins from amino acids) could have formed without the aid of an outside Intelligence