Edited sentence: Also, the definite article is placed before ‘Jews’ and ‘Christians’, indicating that this does not refer to some forgotten minority sect but to the Jews and Christians in general, i.Both are attempts to lessen the problem that the Jews have never held Ezra to be "the son of God" in any exclusive sense like the Christians consider Jesus to be the unique divine son of God.For example the translators Nooruddin or Muhammad Sarwar both insert "(There are) some of" before "the Jews".Since there is no record that Ezra was ever regarded as "the son of God" by the Jews, this statement is historically wrong and therefore this verse became a problem that has led many translaters to make attempts to soften or to hide the issue one way or the other.There is no mention of Jews believing Ezra is the son of God in the Bible nor in any Jewish text.to the believers of the orthodox mainstream in these two religions