Edited sentence: Above all he believes that these mathematically based speculations solve thousand year old philosophical conundrums, without seriously engaging those philosophical issues.As pointed out so well by Eddington in his Gifford lectures, they are partial and incomplete representations of physical, biological, psychological, and social reality.Do you agree.Ellis for presenting his personal philosophical views as scientifically-based when it has not been the case.He responded, "Thus what he is presenting is not tested science.In an article in Scientific American, Ellis was asked "Lawrence Krauss, in A Universe from Nothing, claims that physics has basically solved the mystery of why there is something rather than nothing.In recent times, Krauss has come under heavy criticism by some scientists and cosmologists by presenting his personal and philosophical views on religion and philosophy as scientifically-based, when it has not been the case.It’s a philosophical speculation, which he apparently believes is so compelling he does not have to give any specification of evidence that would confirm it is true.Krauss has often been criticized by fellow scientists and physicists such as George F.The belief that all of reality can be fully comprehended in terms of physics and the equations of physics is a fantasy.Well, you can’t get any evidence about what existed before space and time came into being