Original sentence: "  Keith Windschuttle accuses Chomsky of using evidence that was "selective, deceptive, and in some cases invented" within the works Chomsky has written on this topic
Edited sentence: "  Keith Windschuttle accuses Chomsky of using evidence that was "selective, deceptive, and in some cases invented" within the works Chomsky has written on this topic and for ignoring much worse terror in socialist state he has favored.Body count is all.But the ethical status of the perpetrators, be they individuals or states, could not be more distinct... For [Chomsky], intentions do not seem to matter.In The End of Faith, Sam Harris criticizes Chomsky's usage of "terrorism":.In both cases a child has died, and in both cases it is a tragedy.Nothing in Chomsky's account acknowledges the difference between intending to kill a child, because of the effect you hope to produce on its parents (we call this "terrorism"), and inadvertently killing a child in an attempt to capture or kill an avowed child murderer (we call this "collateral damage")