Original sentence: Symeon of Durham and Adam of Bremen suggest that Cnut had reserved the English throne for Harold, while the Encomium Emmae Reginae, written to defend Harthacnut's mother, Emma, claims that he had done so for Harthacnut.The Encomium Emmae Reginae also claimed that Harold was a servant's son.Ælfgifu was determined that her second son Harold should be the next English king
Edited sentence: And interestingly the Bayeux Tapestry may hint at such a scandal in Scene 15 where it shows a woman named as Aelfgyva and a priest and the description above reads "Where a cleric and Ælfgyva..."  Adam of Bremen states that Svein and Harold were sons to Cnut and a concubina (but that Cnut nevertheless reserved England for Harold, Denmark for Harthacnut).Another way in which the legitimacy of Harold's succession was disputed in the wake of the succession crisis was by focusing on his and his brother's parentage.In any event, on Cnut's death, Ælfgifu was determined that her second son Harold should be the next English king.In the Encomium Emmae Reginae it is heard that Harold was secretly a servant's son.John of Worcester  heard tales in which the fathers of Svein and Harold were respectively a priest and a shoemaker.Symeon of Durham and Adam of Bremen suggest that Cnut had reserved the English throne for Harold, while the Encomium Emmae Reginae claims that he had done so for Harthacnut.The  Anglo-Saxon Chronicle mentions how Harold's claim that he was the son of Cnut and Ælfgifu is either distrusted or simply denied