Original sentence: His release of a series of books on Bradman and Miller—which were condemned as rewrites of others' work and error-strewn due to a lack of fact-checking—within a year of their respective deaths, was seen as commercial exploitationism.However, Perry's work on Bradman has been widely criticised by other cricket historians as being hagiographic, to the extent of being propagandistic; he has been described by Wisden as being Bradman's "amanuensis".Perry is particularly known for a series of books related to Bradman; he was one of the few who were able to speak to the reclusive cricketer.Perry's cricket writing has been widely criticised by other cricket historians, due to their heavy similarity to other writers' previous works, and because of their high density of factual errors.The book had similar themes to Perry’s approach in Miller’s Luck
Edited sentence: The book, , had similar themes to Perry’s approach in Miller’s Luck