Original sentence: FACTNet has maintained a relatively low news profile since 1999, occasionally cited for speaking out against topics they consider important.In 1998, Scientology (through subsidiary Bridge Publications) sued FACTNet for claimed copyright violations.The terms were that if FACTNet is ever found guilty of violations of church copyrights, they are permanently enjoined to pay the church $1 million.When federal judge John Kane denied Scientology's request for summary judgment because FACTNet challenged Scientology's ownership of the copyrights of the documents, a settlement was reached in 1999
Edited sentence: 11 years later, the raid is still well-documented and archived on their website, including a detailed analysis of what it was "really all about".FACTNet has maintained a relatively low news profile since 1995, occasionally cited for speaking out against topics they consider important.If indeed the RTC had intended to silence FACTNet, their actions had the opposite effect.The raid gave the FACTNet community a rallying point and a new example of intimidation and harassment by the Church of Scientology to support their critical views