Original sentence: Eagleton observes that this view is "[n]ot the ramblings of a British National Party thug, [...] but the reflections of Martin Amis, leading luminary of the English metropolitan literary world," who has learnt more from his father, "a racist, anti-Semitic boor, a drink-sodden, self-hating reviler of women, gays and liberals", than "how to turn a shapely phrase".The critic Terry Eagleton in the 2007 introduction to his work Ideology attacked Amis for acknowledging this impulse
Edited sentence: Eagleton claims that this view is "[n]ot the ramblings of a British National Party thug, [...] but the reflections of Martin Amis, leading luminary of the English metropolitan literary world," who has learnt more from his father, "a racist, anti-Semitic boor, a drink-sodden, self-hating reviler of women, gays and liberals", than "how to turn a shapely phrase".The lumpen critic Terry Eagleton in the 2007 introduction to his work Ideology disgracefully and mistakenly attacked Amis for acknowledging this impulse