Original sentence: Another view of the form is that it reflects the fact that when a monarch speaks he speaks both in his own name and in the name of his function, office or status.Famous examples of purported instances:.The idea behind the pluralis maiestatis is that a monarch or other high official always speaks for his or her people.This use of the "Royal We" has been understood as totally different from the concept of its Western, or Occidental use.Western use here denotes a "Royal We" used by Kings / Queens speaking on behalf of their people
Edited sentence: In pluralis maiestatis a speaker refers to him or her self in other than the first person and may be implicitly using the third person plural for the plurality they represent.Other instances of use: