Original sentence: Introvigne also shares a position common to almost all those who develop reputations as cult apologists:  while current members and administrative officials are looked on as potential sources of valuable and unbiased scholarly information, former members or "apostates" as a class are regarded as unreliable sources.Introvigne's characterization of those who disagree with him as "terrorists" also causes controversy.These critics point in particular to Introvigne's ties with the controversial Italian Catholic movement Alleanza Cattolica, of which Introvigne himself writes "militants of Alleanza Cattolica, together with others, founded and still inspire CESNUR, the Centre for the Study of New Religions"
Edited sentence: Critics claim that Introvigne also shares a position common to  cult apologists that assess former members or apostates' testimonies as unreliable.Martinez also challenges Introvigne's article Moral Panics and Anti-Cult Terrorism in Western Europe, published in the peer-reviewed journal 'Terrorism and Political Violence', one of the most authoritative academic forums on terrorism internationally.Miguel Martinez, one of these critics, acusses Introvigne of having ties with the controversial Italian Catholic movement Alleanza Cattolica, claiming that Introvigne himself said in an interview that "militants of Alleanza Cattolica, together with others, founded and still inspire CESNUR, the Centre for the Study of New Religions"