Original sentence: Many remastered CDs from the late 1990s onwards have become casualties of the loudness war, where the average volume of the recording is pushed ever higher at the expense of dynamic range, making the new remastered version sound very different than the original one
Edited sentence: "electronic rechanneling" or simply "rechanneling"), and another being the fact that the original mixdown tape having been damaged and discarded after heavy use.A couple of the reasons for remastering engineers to remix elements of a recording include a first-time stereo mix of a particular song where previous releases were only in mono and/or fake stereo (a.Also many remastered CDs from the late 1990s onwards have become casualties of the loudness war, where the average volume of the recording is pushed ever higher at the expense of dynamic range; this is unnecessary, in fact reduced dynamic range often decreases the likelihood of repeat listening, often without the listener realizing why.In particular, modern-day heavy use of processes like dynamic range compression and noise reduction may have actually sparked disappointment in the eyes of many fans against many current remixes like The Who's Live at Leeds Deluxe.Some argue that remastering something from the early 1980s, for instance, is better than a mastering of a recorded medium from the early 1990s.These people may also argue that the remixing of elements of an original recording may hinder the remastered  one.Those opposed also argue that unless the original recording has been seen, they may also be unaware whether or not there has been considerable update