Original sentence: As chair, he suggested that the mainstream media and the environmentalist movement is not as opposed to nuclear energy as in decades past.He argues that any realistic plan to reduce reliance on fossil fuels or greenhouse gas emissions would require increased use of nuclear energy to supply baseload power.He has also criticized the costs and reliability of wind farms.James Lovelock, Stewart Brand and Hugh Montefiore.Moore is supported by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), a national organization of pro-nuclear industries and in 2009 he chaired their Clean and Safe Energy Coalition.Moore was opposed to nuclear power in the 1970s when he "believed that nuclear energy was synonymous with nuclear holocaust" and "everything nuclear was evil", but has since come to support it, as have other pioneer environmentalist, e
Edited sentence: Although he spoke out against nuclear power in 1976, he is now a paid lobbyist for the Nuclear Energy Institute, an organization that works to promote nuclear power.He also believes that the "solar bubble has burst" and that it is "simply not credible to claim that wind and solar energy can replace coal and natural gas".He also claims that there is "a lot of pro-nuclear sentiment" from the public despite polls showing little global support.He argues that any realistic plan to reduce reliance on fossil fuels  or greenhouse gas emissions need increased use of nuclear energy, although he doubts global warming is caused by humans and that it "has a much better correlation with changes in solar activity than CO2 levels".His support of nuclear power is in opposition to major environmental groups, such as Greenpeace which he claims "is wrong — we must consider nuclear power".Moore is critical of renewable energy, claiming that wind farms are "ridiculously expensive and don't work half the time" and that "no matter how many are built, they won’t replace coal, gas or hydro or nuclear plants"