Original sentence: Litigants who represent themselves (in forma pauperis and pro se) sometimes make frivolous arguments due to their limited knowledge of the law and procedure
Edited sentence: If the pro se litigant persists in arguing that their facts and claims should be recognized and goes to another court to file a related hearing or a Rule 60 motion, then they can be summarily jailed.Litigants who represent themselves (in forma pauperis and pro se) often make frivolous arguments due to their limited knowledge of the law and procedure.No statutory basis is needed and no evidentiary hearing is required.The inherent powers of federal courts allow them to modify procedures and laws as they think best.This is because courts are self regulating and the equal protection and other rights don't apply in court.This is called "direct contempt" because it involves disobeying of a direct order.When a litigant has no lawyer, their summary judgment motions may be "struck" without hearing and ignored.When a litigant is "pro se", without a lawyer, no statements of fact or citations of law are needed to find "frivolousness".When judges order pro se litigants to write what they are dictated and sign their names to it, the pro se litigants have no first amendment or due process rights.see Edward Nottingham