Original sentence: Although Fink acknowledges that Lacan is difficult to read, admitting that "most of us - even those of us who devote a lot of time and energy to deciphering Lacan's work - become infuriated with him for it at one point or another," he takes Sokal and Bricmont to task for elevating a disagreement with Lacan's choice of writing styles to an attack on his thought, which, in Fink's assessment, they fail to understand.Plotnitsky particularly notes that "some of their claims concerning mathematical objects in question and specifically complex numbers are incorrect," (Plotnitsky 112-113) making their attack on Lacan for similar errors particularly egregious
Edited sentence: Although Fink acknowledges that Lacan is difficult to read, admitting that "most of us - even those of us who devote a lot of time and energy to deciphering Lacan's work - become infuriated with him for it at one point or another," he takes Sokal and Bricmont to task for elevating what he believes amounts to a disagreement with Lacan's choice of writing styles to an attack on his thought.Plotnitsky particularly notes that "some of their claims concerning mathematical objects in question and specifically complex numbers are incorrect," (Plotnitsky 112-113)