Original sentence: A group of climate scientists, based on a desire to produce a review of the science by experts who are not themselves authors of the material under review, issued an alternative scientific summary, the "Independent Summary for Policymakers" (ISPM).By way of contrast, authors of the alarmist blog RealClimate described the ISPM as "profoundly ignorant of IPCC processes".Dozens of climate scientists reviewed the ISPM.Reviewers agreed with its conclusions, and strongly supported "the ISPM as a means of communicating the current state of climate science to policy makers and other general readers.They found that it covers an appropriate range of topics, with appropriate communication of the uncertainties involved
Edited sentence: An analysis by climate scientists writing for noted climate science blog RealClimate describes it as "profoundly ignorant" of IPCC processes, and stated that it is better to think of the ISPM as the "Incorrect Summary for Policymakers".Shortly after publication of the AR4 Summary for Policymakers, The libertarian Fraser Institute issued an alternative "Independent Summary for Policymakers" (ISPM) drawing skeptical conclusions