Edited sentence: AiG disagrees with evolution, but they have a very controversial interpretation of what evolution is.And the source of variation is mutation.Evolutionists however do not consider that the evolutionary mechanism works through chance (except in the trivial sense that everything has a probability of occuring between 0 and 1).I wonder if it's deliberately put about maliciously or whether these people honestly believe such a preposterous absurdity.If it was random, then of course it couldn't possibly have given rise to the fantastically complicated and elegant forms that we see.In a discussion on probability, AiG further discuss  the ability for mere chance to create information rich structures.It can't work unless there is some sort of variation upon which to work.It is driven by natural selection, which is a highly non-random force.It is natural selection that directs evolution toward improvement.Mutation is random in that it's not directed toward improvement.Mutation is random only in the sense that it is not directed specifically toward improvement.Natural selection is about as non-random a force as you could possibly imagine.Natural selection is the important force that drives evolution.Of course evolution isn't random.The idea that evolution itself is a random process is a most extraordinary travesty.The prominent evolution scientist, professor Richard Dawkins has said in response to similar views:.Their characterization of evolution is not one that is recognized by evolutionary scientists, or mainstream scientific journals and organizations.This is a spectacular misunderstanding