Edited sentence: 06:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC).Fundamental appreciations must follow historical logic.It should be obvious that doubtful apparitions are not successful, least of all to this extent.Not much of a case should be made for missing documents as these could only be needed to give foundational credit to a belief, never to accredit what has already been successful beyond compare.Paper was not locally produced, thus when scarcity made itself felt with high prices, archives were stolen, a lamentable vandalization to make and sell fireworks which were, even by 1666, one of the main uses for paper.Peter's of Rome coming in second.There is ample evidence of a 16th century shrine to Guadalupe at Tepeyac, however skeptics contend —with no proof whatsoever— that this shrine was dedicated to the Spanish icon Our Lady of Guadalupe in Extremadura despite the fact that no icon of the Extremadura image has ever been churched in Mexico.Undue weight is given to printing, which is interesting as Mexico had the first printing press in the Continent, but there was not much of a book market, least of all for presenting what everybody new by word of mouth.We are discussing the XVI Century, not the XX.— The Shrine of the Virgin in Mexico City is the world's most visited shrine with St