Original sentence: Any commentary he does provides ample evidence to support this view but as soon as these, factual, quotes are put on the page (quotes actually said by Green) they are removed for being inflammatory or because Wikipedia is not about "opinions".As an example there are no real facts to support the view that Green supports Liverpool but there are hundreds, if not thousands, of instances of Green being relentlessly negative and making racist and deliberately inflammatory comments in order to further his own career rather than reflecting what actually happens on the pitch.Green has inadvertantly caused issues within Wikipedia where those that defend him and those appalled by his comments have repeatedly argued.Jonathon Agnew on Test Match Special commented that Greens Wikipedia page was "well worth a visit and was one of the most interesting on Wikipedia.So outrageous are these quotes that they are simply removed and those "editing" claim that Greens own quotes are irrelevant.The argument stems from those stating that Wikipedia is not a forum for opinions and those that try and include Greens own quotes on Greens own Wikipedia page.The people deleting these quotes from Green himself clearly do not understand the purpose of wikipedia as these quotes demonstrate the lengths Green goes to, to develop his own career irrespective of what is happening in the game he is commentating on.They are what make Green a unique, if somewhat psychologically interesting, individual