Original sentence: "  Proponents might argue this is exactly the point; if the person commits the crime then they should receive their punishment."Zero tolerance" policing violates the Law Enforcement Code of Conduct passed by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, which says in part: "The fundamental duties of a police officer include serving the community, safeguarding lives and property, protecting the innocent, keeping the peace and ensuring the rights of all to liberty, equality and justice" (cited in Robinson, 2002).Another criticism of zero tolerance policies is that it makes no room for lack of judgement.For example, a crime enforced under zero tolerance rules may not make any excuses for someone who committed the crime under physical duress or insanity, and may simply ask the question "Did this person commit this crime:  Yes or no.Furthermore, "Zero tolerance" policing are often accompanied by harsh sentening and penalties , raising the danger of abuse (false acuse ) as well as making innocent people worry about false acuse
Edited sentence: Another criticism of zero tolerance policies is that it gives officers and the legal system little discretion in dealing with offenders.Some critics have argued that "Zero tolerance" policing violates the Law Enforcement Code of Conduct passed by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, which says in part: "The fundamental duties of a police officer include serving the community, safeguarding lives and property, protecting the innocent, keeping the peace and ensuring the rights of all to liberty, equality and justice" (cited in Robinson, 2002)