Original sentence: The lawsuit was an outgrowth of a newspaper article in 2001 promoting the use of the kind of characterizations used above involving "monsters," "orphans" and "Nazis.The reporter was charged by his editor with ethical violations and left the paper {cite}
Edited sentence: (But see, below -- Another View: "And Now for 'The Rest of the Story'").The lawsuit was an outgrowth of a sensationalist newspaper article in 2001 promoting the use of the kind of characterizations used above (and therefore left in and not removed with this edit) involving "monsters," "orphans" and "Nazis.The reporter was charged by his editor with ethical violations and left the paper.Why the reporter sought to reach back to a 1939 masters thesis -- out of the hundreds of research projects Johnson had conducted or supervised, or the dozens of recent, serious, and clear ethical violations in human subjects research in other fields -- in an effort to besmirch the reputation of a distinguished scientist over 35 years after his death, and therefore incapable of defending himself, is unknown