Original sentence: According to Sheen and Boyle, Jains have not objected to being covered by personal laws termed under 'Hindu', other sources suggest that the Jains have sought their own personal-family laws.In the Constitution of India, the word "Hindu" has been used in some places to denote persons professing any of these religions: Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism or Sikhism.This however has been challenged by the Sikhs and by neo-Buddhists who were formerly Hindus
Edited sentence: In the Constitution of India, the word "Hindu" has been used in some places to denote persons professing any of these religions: Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism or Sikhism,.This however has been vehemently opposed, especially by the Sikhs, as well as by the Jains