Original sentence: And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to.But that is the full statement of the case.If there is any changing to.It is a good country.It suits us.It well behooves them to be.Let me emphasize here that the restrictionists of Congress do.Let us concede, in all fairness that.Nordics need not be vain.Oh, yes; the others.Opponents often attacked the law claiming that it was related to theories of racial superiority and Madison Grant.Representative Baile.The law was based mostly on the desire of White americans to preserve their status and national identity, as well as concerns of economic competition from foreigners.They added to it, they often enriched it, but they.They came to.We are.What we do claim is that the northern European, and.about their own qualifications.be done, we will do it ourselves.claim that the “Nordic” race, or even the Anglo-Saxon race,.crime and insanity, that the Jew is the best businessman in the.determined that they shall not.did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it.indeed, enriched us, a spiritual exaltation and an artistic creative.is the best race in the world.merits, to make it something different.particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country.sense which have greatly enriched the world and which have,.sense which the Nordic rarely attains.somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their.the Czech is a more sturdy laborer, with a very low percentage of.this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon.world, and that the Italian has a spiritual grasp and an artistic
Edited sentence: Grant was a eugenicist and advocate of the racial hygiene theory.His data purported to show the superiority of the founding Northern European races.Some of the law's strongest supporters were influenced by Madison Grant and his 1916 book, The Passing of the Great Race