Original sentence: By his political opponents, Carl I.During the parliamentary election campaign one year earlier, the Progress Party had promised to support a conservative government, but when the motion failed to pass - in part due to lack of support from Hagen's party - Kåre Willoch explained it as "the unpredictablility of Carl I.Hagen has often been labeled a populist and political chameleon.He is claimed to "quickly change his position on key political issues according to what he thinks will win his party the most votes".The retort from Hagen is that these are undocumented characterizations.These claims dates back to a motion of no confidence in 1986 by the Conservative Party prime minister Kåre Willoch
Edited sentence: Another line of criticism often levied by his political opponents, is that "Carl I Hagen is known for his aggressive attitude towards immigration".By his political opponents, Carl I Hagen has often been labeled a "populist" and "political chameleon".He is said to be "quickly changing his views on key political issues according to what he thinks will win his party the most votes".However, Carl I Hagen has always been very careful to distinguish between criticism of immigrants and his criticism of "naive" immigration policies.However, research on the voting patterns over the years of political parties in the Storting published in 2001, surprisingly showed that the party did not distinguishing itself as particularly inconsistent.Kåre Willoch argued that during the 1985 parliamentary election campaign, The Progress Party had promised to support a non-socialist government.On the contrary, it turned out that The Progress Party distinguished itself as particularly consistent in its voting pattern in the Norwegian Parliament over the years.The charge that The Progress Party often changes its views, goes back to a demand a vote of confidence in 1986 by the then Norwegian Conservative Party prime minister Kåre Willoch.The retort from Carl I Hagen is that this is undocumented characterizations.When he failed to get the votes he needed on his vote of confidence, Kåre Willoch explain it as "the unpredictablility of Carl I Hagen"