Original sentence: ...the film does not mention the specific court case, which is Sullivan v.Lastly, Judge Fox concludes that no court would ever set aside the 16th amendment.The Federal Reserve Act was passed, however, in 1913; Rothschild died in 1812.The Sixteenth Amendment is not exactly the "internal revenue, income tax" amendment.The comments by Judge Fox were mentioned in passing, without judicial review, and in a case that has nothing to do with the Sixteenth Amendment
Edited sentence: ...the film neglects to mention the specific court case, which is Sullivan v.Also worth noting is that while Fox stated that he believed ratification was suspect, the comments were mentioned in passing, without judicial review, and in a case that has nothing to do with the 16th Amendment or the Federal Reserve Act.However, the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913; Rothschild died in 1812.It seems implausible that Rothschild had any knowledge regarding the Federal Reserve Act, considering he'd been dead for just over a hundred years.Lastly, Fox concludes that no court would ever set aside the 16th amendment.Worth noting is that the 16th Amendment is not exactly the "internal revenue, income tax" amendment (Fox may have been confusing the 16th amendment with the Federal Reserve Act, which was passed around the same time, although neither directly dealt with the Internal Revenue Service)