Original sentence: However he struck down the provision that only seven rounds of ammunition could be loaded into a ten-round magazine, calling it "an arbitrary restriction" that violated the Second Amendment, and saying that it could result it "pitting the criminal with a fully-loaded magazine against the law-abiding citizen limited to seven rounds.On December 31, 2013, Chief U.Skretny, of the Federal District Court in Buffalo, upheld most of the New York SAFE Act, saying that its provisions "further the state's important interest in public safety.... it does not totally disarm New York's citizens; and it does not meaningfully jeopardize their right to self-defense"
Edited sentence: New York's law-abiding citizens can once again load 10 rounds into 10 round magazines.On December 31st, 2013,  The ruling by Chief U.Skretny, in Buffalo, found that New York’s gun-control law, the SAFE Act, included a provision that limits a magazine that can hold 10 rounds to just 7 rounds, was to be struck from the states law books.The judge also concluded that the 7 round ban was an "arbitrary number" and held no significant background to prove it would be effective as a gun control measure.This was due to a perverse situation where a law-abiding citizen would be under-armed against a criminal who would not follow the law and load to maximum capacity