Original sentence: In addition, Christian apologetics JP Holding defended Professor Stoner's work in regards to its examination of Bible prophecy against the criticism of one of its critics.Professor Stoner's apologetic work escaped the notice of critics until its inclusion in Josh McDowell's Evidence that Demands a Verdict, criticism of his claims tends to be addressed at McDowell rather than Stoner, with Stoner's name mentioned in passing.Professor Stoner's work Science Speaks was reviewed by the American Scientific Affiliation members and by the Executive Council of the same group was found, in general, to be dependable, accurate, and convincing in regard to the scientific material and the probability material presented in regards to prophecy
Edited sentence: As Stoner's apologetic work appears to have escaped the notice of critics until its inclusion in Josh McDowell's Evidence that Demands a Verdict, criticism of his claims tends to be addressed at McDowell rather than Stoner, with Stoner's name mentioned in passing.Stoner's most famous claim is the supposed improbability that many "fulfilled prophecies" could all come true by chance alone: critics argue that such calculations don't take failed prophecies into account, that he erroneously cites some non-prophetic remarks as prophecies and some failed prophecies as successful, and that his list includes inherently-unverifiable "fulfillments" without allowing for the possibility that these were written after the event, or that the event never actually happened as described (i.either the "prophecy", or the "fulfillment", or both, could simply be fictional)