Edited sentence: Lewis with his argument from reason and Alvin Plantinga with his argument against evolutionary biology), but also because of the many implications of such answers that, in accord to this philosophers, doesn't solve the case of morality at all - i.This type of answer, though, is largely not accepted by modern and contemporary philosophers such as William Lane Craig, who defends a version of the argument based on objective moral values (and not in moral values as a hole), not just because some of this philosophers are scpectics about the veracity of evolutionary biology (examples include Craig himself alongside C.evolution, even if it happens, is in fact uncapable to answer the case of morality