Original sentence: Instead, they called for an impartial, international investigation.NGOs which gathered their own evidence from the scene of the attack rebutted the conclusions of the Israeli investigation, charging that the IDF found its soldiers innocent only to repair its image.Some commentators suggested that the world's willingness to accept the footage at face value was proof of anti-Semitism, mirroring the idea of the "blood libel"—the ancient allegation against the Jewish people that they are willing to sacrifice other people's children.They instead invited United Nations investigators, including John Dugard and fifteen other investigators, to survey eyewitnesses and conduct an investigation at the crime scene.They noted also that the killing was during the third day of the Palestinian intifada, during "a time that saw the highest rate of killing of Palestinian children by [Israeli forces]".Yet others argue that such accusations of anti-Semitism are simply designed to whitewash perceived wrongs committed by the State of Israel
Edited sentence: Both sides invoked the idea of the "blood libel"—the ancient allegation against the Jewish people that they are willing to sacrifice other people's children.From the Arab perspective, the footage proved it.From the Israeli perspective, the world's willingness to accept it at face value was an example of antisemitism