Original sentence: Despite the fact that anarcho-capitalism is an anti-statist philosophy, and argues that it opposes any form of territorial government, anarchists that follow directly from Peter Kropotkin's definition of anarchy would strongly maintain that anarcho-capitalism is not a form of anarchy.The traditions that object to the term anarcho-capitalism are using "anarchism" to refer to a particular socialist political movement.Therefore they see anarcho-capitalism as antithetical to the principles of anarchy.This stems from the fact that the latter traditions are adverse to any form of hierarchy, regarding the uneven distribution of wealth among individuals in a capitalist system as hierarchical, effectivly creating "governmental" power structures even in the absence of a state
Edited sentence: The problem stems from the fact that anarchist traditions growing directly from Peter Kropotkin's definition of anarchy are adverse to any form of hierarchy.The traditions that object to the term anarcho-capitalism are using "anarchism" to refer to a partictular socialist political movement.This tradition regards the uneven distribution of wealth among individuals in a capitalist system as hierarchical, in the sense of empowering some more than others, and therefore antithetical to the principles of anarchy.To speakers of English familiar with only the colloquial definition of the word "anarchism" as refering to the absence of a state, it may seem odd to assert that anarcho-capitalism is not anarchism