Original sentence: Critics argue that Provision 213 authorizes "surreptitious search warrants and seizures upon a showing of reasonable necessity and eliminates the requirement of Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that immediate notification of seized items be provided.In special cases covered by FISA (incorporated in the USA PATRIOT Act), the warrants may come from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) instead of a common Federal or State Court.Section 213, which federal agencies report they have used 155 times since 2001, does not expire later this year like other Patriot Act provisions.The American Civil Liberties Union argues that the term "serious jeopardy" is too broad "and must be narrowly curtailed
Edited sentence: A Sneak-and-Peek search does require a warrant.In special cases covered by FISA (incorporated in the USA PATRIOT Act), the warrant may come from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) instead of a common Federal or State Court.The detractors make a general claim that the government may search anyone's home or gain access to any of their library, finance, or work records without a warrant.This is a blantantly false statement