Original sentence: As a result, scientists who publish in the peer-reviewed literature have had little comment about SEPP's claims.It presents arguments against the global warming theory, and argues that the media and other institutions have shown bias in reporting on the global warming controversy.SEPP's views are either self-published or appear in the mainstream press rather than in peer-reviewed scientific journals
Edited sentence: It presents scientific evidence against the global warming theory, and argues that the media and other institutions have shown bias in reporting on the global warming controversy.Scientific rebuttals of SEPP's analyses are rare and hard to find