Original sentence: Grigory Baklanov (an influential Russian novelist) in his critical study described "200 years"  as "worthless as historical scholarship".Moreover Reznik notes that Solzhenitsyn uncritically used writings of antisemitic pseudo-historian Andrey Dikiy for his statistical data of Jewish participation in early Soviet government and the security apparatus.The book stirred controversy and is viewed by many historians as unreliable in both factual data and ideological approach, and  antisemitic
Edited sentence: Grigory Baklanov (an influential novelist) in his critical study described "200 years"  as "worthless as historical scholarship".Moreover Reznik notes that Solzhenitsyn uncritically used writings of Russian-American historian Andrey Dikiy for his statistical data of Jewish participation in early Soviet government and the security apparatus.The book stirred controversy and is viewed by some Jewish critics as unreliable in both factual data and ideological approach, and  antisemitic