Original sentence: By identifying syādavāda with sansayavāda, he instead addresses "agnosticism", which was argued by.Genuine anekāntavāda thus considers positive and negative attributes of an object, at the same time, and without any contradictions.However, many believe that Sankara fails to address genuine anekāntavāda.Many authors like Pandya believe that Sankara overlooked that, the affirmation of the existence of an object is in respect to the object itself, and its negation is in respect to what the object is not