Original sentence: Thus, according to this argument, Searle's conclusions are based on a false premise
Edited sentence: But this reply appears to be no more than a repetition of the Systems reply, and Searle-in-the-room in this case would still just be following a set of rules, with no understanding of the significance of the symbols they are manipulating.Searle's main point, that the human mind is not just like an appropriately programmed computer, might still stand.That is, if Searle-in-the-room passes the Turing Test, then ipso facto Searle-in-the-room understands Chinese; and therefore his second assumption is incorrect