Original sentence: However, others criticise the lack of certainty with which Regan's "inrinsic value", or "subject-of-a-life" status can be determined, and note that the sufficient conditions he lists (for example, having sense-perceptions, beliefs, desires, motives, and memory) make the condition rougly measure "similarity to humans".Some philosophers, such as Paul Taylor, argue that all individial living beings possess "intrinsic value", limiting the rights that could possibly come along with this status unless such ubquitious human activities as eating, horticulture and antisepsis are to be banned.Supporters note that Regan's argument for animal rights does not rely on inventing some radical new theory of ethics, but (at least in his view) follows from a consistent application of moral principles and insights that many of us already hold with respect to the ethical treatment of human beings
Edited sentence: It is to be noted that Regan's argument for animal rights does not rely on inventing some radical new theory of ethics, but (at least in his view) follows from a consistent application of moral principles and insights that many of us already hold with respect to the ethical treatment of human beings