Original sentence: According to Industry groups including the CIFOG, and researchers at INRA, forced feeding is not a cruel procedure and animals appreciate this treatment.Critics of the AVMA have noted that the organization tends to defend the economic interests of agribusiness over animal welfare, and that it has also declined to take a position against other controversial practices such as forced molting and gestation crates
Edited sentence: (Again, two wrongs don't make a right.According to Industry groups including the CIFOG, and researchers at INRA, forced feeding is not a cruel procedure and animals appreciate this treatment.. However the study has been extensively criticized, of course, by opponents, but even by ex-insiders of INRA, calling the study "pseudo-Science", and therefore casting heavy doubt on its legitimacy.Critics of the AVMA have noted that the organization tends to defend the economic interests of agribusiness over animal welfare and other part of the population not invovlve in agriculture who have a different opinion on the matter, and that it has also declined to take a position against other controversial practices such as forced molting and gestation crates.It would however be very debatable to keep a practice in breah of local laws or sensibilities under the pretext that other countries laws do not apply them (e.The relevance of this point is however debatable since many agree that poultry farming animal welfare is not enviable.dog consumption in south east Asia does not lead to dog consumption / production in the western world)