Edited sentence: " Regarding the current debate, the controversies that are proposed can be found in Ohio's model lesson plan and the peer-reviewed scientific literature to which it makes reference.Constitution, and that they have stated clearly that they no longer favor including either creationism or the Bible in biology textbooks or science classes.He stated regarding the Cambrian explosion, "The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.One example of the proposed educational policy, including issues to be analyzed by students, can be found in Ohio's Model Lesson Plan of 2004 and the scientific literature to which it makes reference.Proponents note that the response seems directed not at the actual pedagogical policy, but rather the belief the it "masks an anti-evolution agenda" despite the "apparently innocuous statements".Proponents respond by noting that some of the relevant controversies and evidence are noted by Charles Darwin in The Origin of Species, especially in Chapters IV and IX.Proponents respond by noting that they only want to teach scientific evidence and have students critically evaluate continuing debates in the scientific community.They also point out that what they advocate would comply with the Establishment Clause of the U.They assert that this is another example of arguing against a straw man rather than addressing the actual policy