Original sentence: " He opposes President Bush's handling of the Iraq War because he believes that Bush has needlessly sacrificed American troops in order to appease the international community and the United Nations.On an appearance on The O'Reilly Factor, he said that the United States should "turn Fallujah into dust
Edited sentence: " Even the well-known conservative O'Reilly was taken aback by Brook's comments, as seen in the following exchange:.Brook also called for a renewal of pride in Western civilization.Brook: I would like to see the United States turn Fallujah into dust; and tell the Iraqis that if you are going to continue to support the insurgents, you will not have homes, not have homes, not have mosques....Brook: No, we wouldn't be Nazis.Brook: No, we're the good guys, Bill, here.During an appearance on The O'Reilly Factor, he said that the United States should "turn Fallujah into dust.He argued that such states pose a severe threat to the security of western nations, and suggested that killing up to hundreds of thousands of their supporters would bring about their defeat.He opposes President Bush's handling of the Iraq War because he believes that Bush has needlessly sacrificed American troops in order to appease the international community and the United Nations.In October 2006, Brook delivered a lecture on the subject of Islamic totalitarian states to an audience at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).O'Reilly: But then we'd be Nazis.O'Reilly: Oh, yeah, we would.O'Reilly: The Nazis thought they were good guys too.That's what the Nazis did.The lecture was sponsored by UCLA L.We're fighting....and Bruins for Israel.that's what the Nazis did