Original sentence: Person-first terminology is rejected by some disabled people, most commonly deaf and autistic people.Since the late 1980s, people-first language has gained considerable acceptance with disabled people as well as professionals working with them or people otherwise interested in the topic.The National Federation of the Blind has also officially rejected person-first terminology.The rationale behind people-first language is that it recognizes that someone is a person, a human being, or a citizen first, and that the disability is a part, but not all of them.Thus, it asks for one to respect the disabled community as first and foremost a community of people
Edited sentence: For example, the National Federation of the Blind has also officially rejected person-first terminology.Person-first terminology is rejected by some (parts of some) relevant groups, most prominently the deaf community and autism community.Since the late 1980s, people-first language has gained considerable acceptance by people with disabilities, as well as professionals working with them or people otherwise interested in the topic.The rationale behind people-first language is that it recognizes that someone is a person, a human being, or a citizen first, and that the disability is a part, but not all of them (and certainly not the first thing).Thus, it asks for one to respect the disability community as first and foremost a community of people