Original sentence: " In a review published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Kauffman analyzed eight Quackwatch articles, including five written by Stephen Barrett, and found them to be "contaminated with incomplete data, obsolete data, technical errors, unsupported opinions, and/or innuendo." Kauffman wrote in conclusion that it was "very probable that many...visitors to the website have been misled by the trappings of scientific objectivity.In the Spiked online survey in collaboration with Pfizer, Barrett was asked: "What inspired you to take up science.Joel M.Kauffman, professor emeritus at University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, and author of Malignant Medical Myths has "turned his attention to exposing fraud in medicine
Edited sentence: In the Spiked online survey, Barrett was asked: "What inspired you to take up science