Original sentence: " The text also does not say that Jesus condemned contemporary Christian churches as corrupt but rather says that Smith discovered their falsity through his own study of the Bible.<ref>Palmer, 236-237; the 1832 account.A quarter of the original Quorum of the Twelve Apostles and some 300 members — perhaps fifteen percent of the total membership —had left the church.Another difference that has been commented on between the 1838 and 1832 accounts is that in the 1838 account Joseph claims that it had never entered into his heart "that the existing churches were all wrong," but according to the 1832 account in his own handwriting, he had already concluded from reading the Bible that all churches were wrong.Critics also charge that Joseph Smith had a motive for changing his story in 1838, a period of crisis within the Church.Critics interpret these omissions as evidence Smith altered or fabricated the story , while apologists argue that just because Smith omitted details in the 1832 doesn't mean that the details didn't occur.Critics view the 1838 version of the First Vision as a significant change, particularly with respect to the 1832 version.Many early leaders left the Church in 1838, and there was open dissent against Smith's leadership.The 1832 account does not mention an appearance of God the Father, nor does it mention the phrase "This is my beloved Son, hear him.To declare that his original call had come from God the Father and Jesus Christ rather than an angel would have strengthened Smith's leadership role — and in fact, it did so