Original sentence: " However, in his published works, even late in life, Tucker was always careful to distinguish between two forms of socialism, state socialism and anarchist socialism." Thus, he believed that workers should be in possession of their own means of production individually rather than as a collective unit or bureaucratic organization.Eseentially such a society would be one where all workers would be owners and all owners would be workers simultaneously.One is communistic, the other solidaritarian.One is destructive, the other constructive.One is dictatorial, the other libertarian.One is dogmatic, the other scientific.One is emotional, the other reflective.One is metaphysical, the other positive.There are two Socialisms.This distinction, which is evident in all of Tucker's work, can be seen especially in his essay "State Socialism and Anarchism":.Tucker defined socialism as the claim that "labor should be put in possession of its own.Tucker even went so far as to call his philosophy "scientific socialism" (borrowing the phrase from Karl Marx)
Edited sentence: " He continued to oppose anarcho-communism, claiming that "'Anarchism' in Spain is a misnomer" and that Spanish anarchists are a "crazy bunch"." Though Tucker saw non-labor income as exploitative, when his mother died he received an inheritance, the larger part of which he invested in annuity shares, which provided him with, the then comfortable, income of $1,650 a year." Tucker even went so far as to call his philosophy "scientific socialism" (borrowing the phrase from Karl Marx).Tucker said that the "bottom claim of socialism [is] that labor should be put in possession of its own