Original sentence: 's May 3rd order to remove the cross.Circuit Court of Appeals declined to step in and suspend the $5,000 daily fine that will be imposed on the city if the cross isn't removed from city property by August 1st.The plaintiff argued that the ballot measure was unconstitutional because it resulted in an unconstitutional act -- transferring the property to the federal government for the purpose of keeping the cross in its present location on public parkland, a purely religious symbol of one faith
Edited sentence: 's May 3 order to remove the cross.Circuit Court of Appeals declined to step in and suspend the $5,000 daily fine that will be imposed on the city if the cross isn't removed from city property by August 1.The plaintiff argued that the ballot measure was unconstitutional because it resulted in an unconstitutional act—transferring the property to the federal government for the purpose of keeping the cross in its present location on public parkland, a purely religious symbol of one faith