Original sentence: Doughney marked the first significant case where parody was a meaningful potential defense, given the content of the site.Doughney, alleging unfair competition and violations of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.He was forced to surrender the domain name to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and the site is now located on a personal web page.In 2001, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals sued Mr.Mike Doughney registered the domain name "peta.Most previous cybersquatting cases had been in cases where there was a "bad faith intent to profit"; People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v.People Eating Tasty Animals is a website hosted by Mike Doughney, that parodies the animal rights organization PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals).org" in 1996
Edited sentence: People Eating Tasty Animals is a website hosted by Mike Doughney, that mocks the animal rights organization PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals).The courts have ruled that the website is not a parody of the PETA website as it fails to express that it both is and is not the PETA website.There is also a website called "People Who Enjoy Eating Tasty Animals".True parodies of the PETA acronym are "People Euthanizing Thousands of Animals", and "Please Eat The Animals"