Original sentence: (If one wanted to perform a long-term controlled study of vaccination, one would take two large groups of people, and vaccinate one group and not vaccinate the other.-- Fact #1 (disputed by no one): There are no long-term double-blind controlled studies of.-- Fact #2: Epidemiological evidence shows that vaccines are not 100% effective and that they sometimes even work to increase incidence of disease.-- Fact #3: Epidemiological evidence show that vaccine programs can decrease the incidence and prevalence of disease, and in the case of smallpox, eliminated naturally occurring cases of the disease.-- Fact #4: Post-exposure prophylaxis vaccination has been demonstarted to reduce the incidence and severity of such diseases as smallpox and rabies.Anti-Vaccination site which asserts that vaccination is ineffective and dangerous.Then one would wait and see how the individuals in each group fared over a period of months or years.Vaccination Debate Anti-Vaccination site.any vaccine for any disease published in any journal in any country in any time period
Edited sentence: (If one wanted to perform a long-term controlled study of.-- Fact #1 (disputed by no one): There are no long-term controlled studies of.-- Fact #2 (vehemently disputed by doctors who were never given this evidence.Links: Vaccination Debate.Steingraber so famously put it in her 1996 book, Living Downstream, is the.Then one would wait and see how the.Vaccine Website  where there is proof vaccination is ineffective and dangerous.any vaccine for any disease published in any industry journal in any country.group and not vaccinate the other.in any time period.in medical school): Epidemiological evidence (epidemiology, as Sandra.individuals in each group fared over a period of months or years.science of body count) shows that vaccines are ineffective and that they.sometimes even work to increase incidence of disease.vaccination, one would take two large groups of people, and vaccinate one