Original sentence: '"  An article by Raymond Ibrahim in the National Review criticized Armstrong as an "Islamic apologist extraordinaire" who tells the reader "to ignore history and doctrine, focus on platitudes about peace and love
Edited sentence: '"  Daniel Pipes criticized her book, Islam: A Short History, as "foully dishonest," containing "factual inaccuracies" and engaging in "moral relativism".An article by Sam Harris in the Huffington Post criticized Armstrong as an example of a Western scholar who lives in a world of "political correctness and religious apology" in obfuscating the problematic issues of Islam, while an article by Raymond Ibrahim in the National Review criticized Armstrong as an "Islamic apologist extraordinaire" who tells the reader "to ignore history and doctrine, focus on platitudes about peace and love.Powell of Syracuse University called Armstrong's The New York Times Magazine article The Crusades Even Now as following "more in the tradition of a moral sermon than an effort to understand the past" while Thomas Madden criticized her book Holy War: The Crusades and Their Impact on Today’s World as "largely an exercise in modern left-wing rhetoric about sensitivity, tolerance, and the evils of Western civilization.Regarding Armstrong's writing on the Crusades, a lecture by the late professor James M