Original sentence: REDIRECT Ross Ulbricht
Edited sentence: It raises both the issues of whether the warrantless seizure of an individual's Internet traffic without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment and whether the Sixth Amendment permits judges to find the facts necessary to support an otherwise unreasonable sentence.On 7 March 2018, the U.The government argues that a decision on the first issue of his appeal should be postponed until a decision is granted in Carpenter v.The government suggested outright dismissal of the second issue, citing a lack of supporting precedent as well as noting that the Sixth Amendment claim was not raised prior to filing the petition.Ulbricht v.United States is a pending case before the United States Supreme Court.United States, which involves similar concerns related to collection of communication data.government filed a response to Ross Ulbricht's petition