Edited sentence: , was still in it´s last phase.Antique semitic tribes like the Arameans and the Jews evolved later in a complex process called ethnogenesis.EN means ´lord´, and ME `priest`, the /r/ before the KAR slipped in on phonetic reasons.Eridu´s golden time was during the phases Ubaid I-IV, which is about 5900-4300 BC.First there is absolutely no historical legitimation to set a jewish or hebrew people in Babylonia (in this case, Babylonia is an anachronistic name) at a time when the semitic migration, which started in the 4th millenium B.Fourth and last: Eridu is far older than Babylon, which at about 2000 BC was only a small village with less than 5000 inhabitants (numbers may differ, cause due to the archeological conditions at Babil excavations that could lighten up these periods are not possible).It is also possible to read ME as ´divine powers´, thus coming to a meaning like ´Lord of the divine powers of the harbour".It is not possible to propose a continuity of culture and people over a time of over 5000 years (597 and 587 BC Nebukadnezzar raids Jerusalem and deportes about 10 000, "the upper tenthousand", jews to northern Babylonia), at all since the population of Eridu was in it´s beginning surely pre-sumerian and changed to sumerian in the middle to end of the 4th millenium BC and Babylon was clearly a semitic city, which had it´s first imperial time under Hammurapi in 1792-1750 BC.It is obvious that such a statement cannot withstand the power of scientific proofs we have about this problem.Second: KAR does not mean ´hunter´ but ´harbor´.So Enme(r)kar means something like ´lord of the priests harbours` or ´priest-lord of the harbours´, a title that could belong to the sacral-bourocratic sphere of mesopotamian leadership.Third:The name Nimrod as a symbol of assyrian oppression is retrospectively projected in the early times of mesopotamian history to make the actions, sins in the biblical sense, of Babylonians and Assyrians appear to exist since the beginning of history