Original sentence: The Daily Telegraph argued Kaufman's expense claims were including £1,461 for a “second-hand rug replacing 24-year-old carpet”.he then claimed an additional £389 for “customs duty on rug”, that he imported from a the Showplace Antique + Design Centre on West 25th Street in Manhattan, New York for a $2,750 receipt, a rejected claim of £8,865 for a for a Bang & Olufsen Beovision 40 in LCD television since the "item falls within the not allowable category of luxurious furnishings" so he was paid £750
Edited sentence: The Daily Telegraph argued Kaufman's expense claims were including £1,461 for a “second-hand rug replacing 24-year-old carpet”,if that was not enough he then claimed an additional £389 for “customs duty on rug”, that he imported from a the Showplace Antique + Design Centre on West 25th Street in Manhattan, New York for a $2,750 receipt, a rejected claim of £8,865 for a for a Bang & Olufsen Beovision 40 in LCD television since the "item falls within the not allowable category of luxurious furnishings" so he was paid £750