Original sentence: His specific predictions for England therefore may have erred because he used a static analysis, and extrapolated his historical numbers into the future without considering future factors that could increase the resource base more rapidly, (for example, the revolutions in agriculture at his time or later the Green Revolution), although he correctly predicted that population growth could decline or reverse with later marriages and "vices" like contraception (see for example, the demographic transition).On a global scale, since the industrial revolution, food production has sometimes grown faster than human population.Some have argued that poverty and famine are caused by inept governance and economic policies, and that higher population density leads to more specialization and technological innovation, potentially leading to a higher standard of living.To avoid this outcome, Malthus argued for population control through "moral restraint".While arguably he was right about human history up to his time, he made his prediction for the future exactly at the time the industrial revolution and a similar revolution in agriculture caused a large increase in available resources
Edited sentence: His specific predictions for England therefore failed because he used a static analysis, and extrapolated his historical numbers into the future without considering unprecedented factors that could increase the resource base available faster than he thought, (for example, the revolutions in agriculture at his time or later the Green Revolution), although he correctly predicted that population growth could decline or reverse with later marriages and "vices" like contraception (see for example, the demographic transition).On a global scale, since the industrial revolution, food production has grown faster than human population.Some have argued that poverty and famine are caused by bad government and bad economic policies, and that higher population density leads to more specialization and technological innovation, potentially leading to a higher standard of living.To avoid this happening, Malthus argued for population control through "moral restraint".While arguably he was right about human history up to his time, he made his prediction for the future exactly at the time the industrial revolution and a similar revolution in agriculture caused a very large increase in available resources