Original sentence: He claims homonegativity as distinct from homophobia, as a religious or moral basis to specifically oppose homosexuality or homosexuals, while not being so strict about other, unrelated moral or religious normatives.He does not consider the term "homophobia" wholly inaccurate, and says that homophobia really exists as a distinct phenomenon.Hudson and Ricketts propose to use this term as descriptive for any negative attitude towards homosexuality (be it emotional, moral or intellectual disapproval), regardless of the sources of this attitude (be it based on religious, moral, ideological or other beliefs)
Edited sentence: But he thinks that the term must be narrowed to those who use religious or moral arguments to specifically target homosexuality or homosexuals, while not being so strict about other, unrelated to homosexuality, moral or religious normatives.He does not feel the term "homophobia" as being totally incorrect and says that homophobia really exists and it is a distinct phenomenon.He says that homonegativity is a phenomenon which is really existent.Hudson and Ricketts propose to use this term as descriptive for any negative attitude towards homosexuality (be it emotional, moral or intellectual disapproval) regardless of the sources of this attitude (be it based on religious, moral, ideological or other beliefs).In their view, term "homonegativity" includes what was previously considered as "homophobia" and should be used instead of it.It has strong psychiatric connotations with phobias, while the negative feelings and emotions against homosexuality or homosexual people are not usually fears, but, more frequently, hatred, or prejudice, or aversion to homosexuality and/or homosexuals.Or to those who support or propose discrimination for homosexuals