Original sentence: According to this understanding, for a sacrament to be valid three elements are necessary: the matter; the form, being in this case the words of institution:  "For this is my Body" recited over the bread and "For this is the cup of my Blood" over the wine; and the intention of the priest to do what the Church does.The counter-argument, which apparently lies behind Rome's decision, asserts that "the words of the institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent narration and in a literal way but in a eucological and disseminated manner, that is to say they are integrated in the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession which follow".The latter, however, is not accepted by traditionalist Roman Catholics.They would argue that the consequences of this determination are very weighty in that it completely overthrows the sacramental theology ratified by the Council of Trent
Edited sentence: For a sacrament to be valid three elements are necessary: the matter, the form, and the intention of the priest (minister) to do what the Church intends.For they, the consequences of this decision are very weighty for it completely overthrows the sacramental theology ratified by the Council of Trent.In so far as one calls forth historical arguments, as the Roman document does, one wonders how one can explain the absence of the words of consecration in this anaphora.In the anaphora the form (the words of consecration) is lacking.In the traditionalist perspective, the origin of it is very probably in the secret of the hidden mystery, this law of secrecy which, in the first centuries of the Church, required to keep the sacred realities hidden from profane eyes.So, in this line, before the schism of the Eastern Assyrian Church, these words were actually pronounced, even if they were not written; after the schism it ceased to be done.The Congregation justify it be asserting that "the words of the institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent narration and in a literal way but in a eucological and disseminated manner, that is to say they are integrated in the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession which follow".Traditionalists say that this explanation is not good enough; on the contrary, it justifies the acceptance of a theology other than that of the Catholic Church