Original sentence: Other again holds that those acts are in them self a form of limited government intervention, and thus is similar to what the free-market economist wants to avoid.Some laissez-faire and free-market fundamentalist economists fear that Stglitz lines of reasoning, which is based on theories of Information economics and information asymmetry, could amount to an economic argument for more government intervention and regulation, which they find distorting and inefficient.These economist rather hold that if imperfect information sometimes distorts markets, then governments should address the underlying distortions with transparent processes, simpler rules and less direct intervention in the market
Edited sentence: For them the thinking goes that if imperfect information sometimes distorts markets, then governments sometimes need to fix those distortions.Some laissez-faire and free-market fundamentalist economists fear that Stglitz lines of reasoning, which is based on theories of Information economics and information asymmetry, could amount to an economic argument for more government regulation, which they abhor.Their arguments hardly hold, as this very act of government "fixing" markets distortions, when and where "market fixing" is feasible, would represent, in itself, a justification for some limited gorvernment intervention in the economy