Original sentence: It does not mention paedophilia as a separate topic, nor any instruction regarding nonchaste heterosexual candidates.The document has attracted criticism based on an interpretation that the document implies that homosexuality leads to pedophilia.The document restricts itself to homosexual candidates, and in certain circumstances others such as heterosexuals experimenting with same-gender sex a few years before applying to a seminary, or a person openly supporting certain homosexual rights organisations.TheBelgian college of Bishops elaborated that the sexual restrictions for seminary and priesthood candidates apply likewise for men of all sexual orientations.There is no new moral teaching to be found in the instruction: the instruction proposed by the document is rather towards enhancing vigilance in  barring homosexuals from seminaries, and from the priesthood.There is some question as to whether the document states that all men with a fixed homosexual orientation are barred from Holy Orders, or simply those whose sexuality is obsessive or neurotic
Edited sentence: For this reason Church officials like the Belgian college of Bishops found it necessary to clarify that the sexual restrictions for seminary and priesthood candidates apply likewise for men of all sexual orientations.Further, there is some question as to whether this bars all men with a fixed homosexual orientation from Holy Orders, or simply those whose sexuality is obsessive or neurotic.On the other hand it gives a broad definition of Persons with Homosexual Tendencies: a heterosexual experimenting with same-gender sex a few years before applying admission to a seminary would, under this instruction, be denied access, as would a person openly supporting homosexual rights organisations.The document does not mention paedophilia as a separate topic, neither does it mention how to deal with heterosexuals that have a sex-life incompatible with Catholic teachings.The document has also attracted criticism based on an interpretation that the document implies that homosexuality leads to pedophilia.There is no new moral teaching to be found in the instruction: the strategy proposed by the document is rather an enhanced vigilance in view of barring homosexuals from seminaries, and from priesthood.Thus, at least in appearance, the document discriminates between homosexuals and heterosexuals