Edited sentence: " Miracles in traditional sense, are however reported in the Muslim tradition.' Ernst states that this main shift reflects the growth of bourgeois scientific rationalism in Muslim countries.According to historian Denis Gril, although according to the Qur'an, Muhammad did prophesied but he was not granted to perform miracles in their traditional sense "as they were not, ipso facto, sufficient to convince unbelievers.And lastly, 'the ongoing challenge of reforming or reviving Islamic law perpetuated concern for the life of Muhammad as a normative model for human behavior.Carl Ernst believes that this main shift away from presenting a miraculous view of Muhammad has been a response to the stridently negative depictions of Muhammad created by European authors.Daniel Brown adds two more reasons: First, Muslims in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries were faced with social and political turmoil.Miracle in the Qur'an can be defined as a supernatural intervention in the life of human beings, and "verses" of the Qur'an (believed by Muslims to be the divine speech in human language) were presented by Muhammad as his chief Miracle.Modern Muslim biographies of Muhammad however portray him as a progressive social reformer, a political leader and a model of human virtue.The desire for the restoration of the Muslim community encouraged them to view Muhammad as a model for social and political reform.The pre-modern Muslim biographies of Muhammad envisions Muhammad as a cosmic figure, invested with superhuman qualities.The view of these modern biographies is that Muhammad's real miracle, as Daniel Brown states modern historians would probably agree, 'was not a moon split or a sighing palm tree, but the transformation of the Arabs from marauding bands of nomads into world conquerors