Original sentence: ,   ), and is now considered over-done and unreliable.An example is the book-length compilation by Charles Bryant entitled "Indian Massacre in Minnesota", initially published in 1863 and frequently reprinted thereafter.More modern commentators generally omit these viscerally compelling personal recollections of injury and death suffered by white victims while emphasizing the complicity of pioneer farmers in the abuses and neglect perpetrated by the governmental reservation and trading system.Statements such as these no doubt reinforced the perception of diabolical savagery on the part of the Sioux that continued into the 20th century in some parts of rural Minnesota:.These later accounts include sympathetic descriptions of the privations and post-mortem incivilities endured by Native American perpetrators and sometimes omit mention of the gruesome and attrocious manner of death suffered by many isolated frontier families during the uprising.This genre of eyewitness description now requires a preface that explains the extreme prejudices and racist points of view of the victims (see, e
Edited sentence: An example is the book-length compilation by Charles Bryant entitled "Indian Massacre in Minnesota", published in 1863 and frequently reprinted thereafter.Statements such as these no doubt reinforced the perception of diabolical savagery on the part of the Sioux that continued into the 20th century in rural Minnesota:.Such apologia and condescension is considered unnecessary, however, with respect to any sympathetic description of the privations and post-mortem incivilities endured by admitted Indian perpetrators.This genre of eyewitness description now requires a preface that explains the extreme prejudices and racist points of view of the victims, and is now considered over-done and unreliable