Original sentence: Defenders of Lewis assert that the majority of criticism against Lewis' works comes from those who disagree with Christianity.Fans of Lewis uphold that applying intense scrutiny using modern ethical standards a childrens book written in another social context is unreasonable.If literary critics do not hold other classic works accountable to modern day social norms, they should therefore not make exceptions for Lewis.In regards to the role of women in his works, Lewis' apologists cite their positive roles in the series, like Lucy Pevensie and Aravis, who are main characters in the The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and The Horse and His Boy, respectively.One example is Pullman, who is an atheist.Some believe that the religious aspect of Lewis and his books makes it difficult for a truly objective analysis of Narnia simply as a children's story
Edited sentence: As in the case of Philip Pullman, it is not surprising to any fan of Lewis his strong attacks against Narnia.Defenders of Lewis note that the majority of criticism against Lewis' works originates from those whom already have presuppositions against religion, most notably Christianity.Fans of Lewis uphold that applying intense scrutiny using modern standards of political correctness on a childrens book written in another social context is unreasonable.If literary critics do not hold other classic works accountable to modern day social norms, therefore they should not make exceptions for Lewis.In regards to the role of women in his works, defenders of Lewis cite their positive roles in the series, like Lucy Pevensie and Aravis, who are main characters in the The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and The Horse and His Boy, respectively.Many believe the religious aspect of Lewis and his books makes it difficult for a truly objective analysis of Narnia simply as a children's story