Original sentence: Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people"
Edited sentence: " (A statement we now know was not supported by the available evidence." (Whether this is a casus belli is debatable with the laws of war in mind.(A statement we now know was not supported by the available evidence.(Despite this statement, and subsequent comments by the Bush administration, at the time weapon inspectors were given access to the alleged weapon factories and it was the invasion of Iraq by the US that forced them out.(Under international law, this is not a valid casus belli, and as such attacking Iraq would constitute a war of aggression.(We know that the available evidence showed no "working relationship" between Iraq and the people behind 9/11).Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people" (We now know that the available evidence at the time showed there probably were no WMD's in Iraq