Original sentence: A RAND licensing for such other rights might still ease his  operations but it just negates the freeness of a particular piece of software — written and licensed free but still in need for charges.If a user of such software thinks he needs more rights from third parties, then he has to care for this on his own.Other rights like patent rights and similar are generally not covered with this.Providing really free software for a standard that incorporates RAND components therefore is a problem for the free and open source community.RAND is also in conflict with free software as this is often offered for no fee at all and most often with no way to track any distribution or even the "customer base".Whoever does use the software is granted the rights of the copyright holders for the code via some license like the GPL for free
Edited sentence: Almost all free software licenses are RAND, but a RAND license is not necessarily compatible with free software licenses