Original sentence: He insisted that Devasahayam was recorded as a palace employee, not an army chief; that he was executed because he had tampered with palace records and passed them to De Lannoy; and he was executed only after confirmation of the sedition.He was ordered to be taken to the then state border at Aralvaimozhy, where he would be banished.However, Professor A.It is a concocted story and figment of imagination.Narayanan, former chairman of the Indian Council of Historical Research, said there was no record of an army chief by this name in Kerala's history.Parameswaran of the Hindu spiritual organisation Vivekananda Kendra accused the CBCI of an attempt to hurt Hindu sentiments.Sreedhara Menon, a historian and author of many books on the history of Travancore, says, "Leave alone execution, not even a single case of persecution was recorded in the history of Travancore in the name of religious conversion.This led to controversy as some believe he was executed for sedition, and deny that there is any evidence of religious persecution in Travancore during that period
Edited sentence: He was ordered to be taken to the then state border at Aralvaimozhy, where he was supposed to be banished, but finished