Original sentence: " Swedish magazine Gamereactor gave Haze a score of 6/10, but Ubisoft forced the review be taken down from their website., while Martin Robinson of IGN UK gave the game a 6.5/10.Haze had generally received mediocre reviews from critics.In addition, Japanese magazine Famitsu awarded the game 34/40.Jeff Haynes of IGN rated it a 4.5/10, criticizing the "horrible plot, weak gameplay mechanics and visuals that are truly underwhelming.Lastly, Steve Boxer of The Guardian said "while it's very enjoyable to play, it also disappoints somewhat.More reviews were also somewhat disappointing.Narayan Pattison of IGN AU gave it 6.2/10.PSM3 magazine gave it a rating of 7.1/10 and said it "fails to better UT3, Resistance and CoD4" and it "feels like a novel idea that missed its window of opportunity.Poor reviews included X-Play giving Haze a rating of 2 out of 5 stars citing bad level designs, rehashed - stereotypical characters, quirky AI reactions, and a "stupid plot".There still have been some positive reviews
Edited sentence: " PSM3 magazine gave it a rating of 7.1/10 and said it "fails to better UT3, Resistance and CoD4" and it "feels like a novel idea that missed its window of opportunity.Haze received mixed reviews from critics.Japanese magazine Famitsu awarded the game 34/40.. Jeff Haynes of IGN rated it a 4.5/10, criticizing the "horrible plot, weak gameplay mechanics and visuals that are truly underwhelming.Martin Robinson of IGN UK gave the game a 6.5/10, while Narayan Pattison of IGN AU gave it 6.2/10.Steve Boxer of The Guardian said "while it's very enjoyable to play, it also disappoints somewhat.Swedish magazine Gamereactor gave Haze a score of 6/10, but Ubisoft forced the review be taken down from their website.X-Play gave Haze a rating of 2 out of 5 stars citing bad level designs, rehashed - stereotypical characters, quirky AI reactions, and a "stupid plot"