Original sentence: , serves as a wake-up call for the industry, highlighting the need for companies to be transparent about their climate risks and the potential economic impact.Exxon Mobil Corp.ExxonMobil continues to publicize how environmentally friendly they are on their website, claiming to strive to be a leader in the industry.ExxonMobil themselves would face a great loss if the case were decided in favor of the District of Columbia.Only 0.2 percent of capital investments by ExxonMobil are in green technology.The case involves allegations that ExxonMobil has not only misled the public about the effects of climate change occurring but also misleads investors into believing that ExxonMobil was more climate-friendly.They would have to pay damages from the case along with facing additional backlash from the public.This case, among other cases from ExxonMobil like People of the State of New York v.This information misleads consumers and investors and portrays ExxonMobil as a company that shows the good impacts of their company on the environment but hides the bad ones
Edited sentence: Although the District of Columbia has yet to reach a decision on whether consumers were misled, it once again shows how it is easy to mislead people and investors about the truth of environmental concerns.Exxon Mobil Corp, serves as a wake-up call for the industry, highlighting the need for companies to be transparent about their climate risks and the potential economic impact.ExxonMobil still continues to display how environmentally friendly they are on their website, they claim to strive to be a leader in the climate change industry.ExxonMobil themselves would face a great loss if the case were to be sided with the District of Columbia.Only 0.2 percent of capital investments by ExxonMobil are from investing in green technology.The case involves allegations that ExxonMobil has not only misled the public about the effects of climate change occurring but also misleads investors into believing that ExxonMobil was more climate-friendly which is more of a reason to invest in them.They would have to pay damages from the case along with facing more backlash from the public eye.This case, among other cases from ExxonMobil like People of the State of New York V.This information is misleading to consumers and investors and portrays ExxonMobil as a company that shows the good impacts of their company on the environment but hides the bad ones