Original sentence: "  However, because they promote the absence of interference in their particular economic model, they claim to uphold it as a "free" market despite the fact that they endorse the interference in a number of other economic models.Anarcho-capitalism is a synthesis of individualist anarchism and classical liberalism (see libertarianism) according to its supporters.However, opponents argue that it rejects the primary tenet of anarchism, the absence of rulership, by upholding an economic model that endorses a series of mini-states in the form of corporations, all of whom would be in constant economic conflict.The relatively small subset of liberals who refer to themselves as "anarcho-capitalists" consider all forms of government unnecessary and harmful, with the exception of those forms of government which enforce private property relations by way of privately and corporately funded defense agencies.Though their concept of coercion is restricted to direct physical threat not involving "legitimate" private property claims, they consider capitalist corporations based on supposedly voluntary contracts as a legitimate and efficient way for people to organize
Edited sentence: "  However, because they promote the absence of interferance in their particular economic model, they claim to uphold it as a "free" market despite the fact that they endorse the interferance in a number of other economic models.Anarcho-capitalism is a synthesis of individualist anarchism and classical liberalism (see libertarianism) according to those who ascribe to it.However, it actually rejects the primary tenet of anarchism, the absence of rulership, by upholding an economic model that endorses a series of mini-states in the form of corporations, all of whom would be in constant economic conflict.The relatively small subset of liberals who mistakenly refer to themselves as "anarcho-capitalists" consider all forms of government unnecessary and harmful, with the exception of those forms of government which enforce private property relations by way of privately and corporately funded defense agencies.Though their conception of coercion is restricted to direct physical threat not involving "legitimate" private property claims, they consider capitalist corporations based on supposedly voluntary contracts as a legitimate and efficient way for people to organize