Original sentence: Skeptics claim several impossibilities in the tale of Noah's ark:
Edited sentence: "Felidae")or the term taxa.But they have an animus against science and scientists, almost all of whom they consider outright atheists (see Wedge Strategy); therefore they are not satisfied to simply discount or ignore science, but seem determined to make a hodgepodge of it with biblical material, so no one can tell where science begins or ends and where Bible stories do either.In fact, it makes little or no sense for the proponents of Intelligent Design or the Noah's Ark legend (taken literally) to use information presented by "standard" biology, or even the taxonomic groups (e.Purported (but unidentified) skeptical biologists ostensibly claim several impossibilities in the tale of Noah's ark, though no known research biologist is interested in this story except as religious allegory:.Since the ID supporters deny science as "materialist" trash anyway, there is no point to cite these arguments and reply to them.Such believers accord all the development of modern life forms to divine intervention and miracles.The following objections appear to be just strawmen, proffered by supporters of ID, because they all are couched in the form of scientific objections.They might do better to stick with Genesis and ignore present-day biology as practised by scientists, hoping it will go away.Thus, they make a patchwork by alternating between the stories in Genesis, including miracles, and "scientific" classifications and results.Witness that there is no scientist identified with any of these objections