Original sentence: For a sacrament to be valid three elements are necessary: the matter; the form, being in this case the words of institution; and the intention of the priest to do what the Church does.Some Traditionalist Catholic groups have denounced this decision as heretical.The counter-argument, which apparently lies behind Rome's decision, asserts that "the words of the institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent narration and in a literal way but in a eucological and disseminated manner, that is to say they are integrated in the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession which follow".They would argue that the consequences of this determination are very weighty in that it completely overthrows the sacramental theology ratified by the Council of Trent.This argument, however, is not accepted by traditionalist Roman Catholics
Edited sentence: Hence the sacrament of eucharist is not effected.Many Catholics who are not traditionalist catholics have sought further clarification regarding this decision.Some Traditionalist Catholic groups have denounced this decision as contrary to established sacramental theology.The Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith justifies its decision by asserting that "the words of the institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent narration and in a literal way but in a eucological and disseminated manner, that is to say they are integrated in the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession which follow".They contend that in the Anaphora of Addai and Mari the form, that is, the Words of Institution (Words of Consecration) are lacking.[citation needed] They hold that the explanation of the decision contradicts the teaching of the Council of Trent (16th century), namely, that a sacrament requires three elements: matter, form, and intention