Original sentence: Criticism that the UN is ruled by "tyranny of the majority" where for example, it is said that Arab states have an unfairly large influence as seen by the large number of resolutions  (over 30% of all resolutions in the history of the UN) which are directly condemnatory of Israel (although it is worthy of note that many non-Arab and non-Muslim-majority nations have, for whatever reason, often supported such resolutions).Most such charges revolve around the International Court of Justice, and UN pressure to accept compulsory jurisdiction of this court.The UN gives precedence to government authority over individual liberty, regularly seeming reluctant to challenge member states' behaviour regarding their own populace.The inclusion on the United Nations Commission on Human Rights of nations, such as Sudan, Cuba and Libya, which demonstrably have abyssmal records on human rights.This was highlighted in 2003 by controversy surrounding the United States-led invasion of Iraq (which was not conducted in contravention of UN policy, but was, however, conducted despite intense disapproval by a majority of the vocal membership), and by Iraq's converse direct defiance of UN weapons and humanitarian resolutions
Edited sentence: Criticism that the UN is ruled by "tyranny of the majority" where for example, it is said that Arab states have an unfairly large influence as seen by the large number of resolutions condemning Israel (although non-Arab nations have supported said resolutions).The UN gives precedence to government authority over individual liberty, regularly seeming reluctant to challenge member states' behaviour regarding their own people.The inclusion on the United Nations Commission on Human Rights of nations, such as Sudan, Cuba and Libya, which are claimed to have very poor records on human rights.This was especially highlighted with the United States' invasion of Iraq, and with Iraq's direct defiance of UN weapons and humanitarian resolutions