Edited sentence: Among the 24 remaining specific accusations, two may be proven if further sustained.And most probably for DCSD not the expected outcome of his investigation when it stated: The interested public will thus be granted an opportunity to have full access to the facts of the case.But they are of little significance, if the scope of the book as a whole is considered.Having reached the conclusion that the concrete accusations against Lomborg largely don’t hold, it is legitimate to question the approaches of Lomborg’s opponents.In response to the first verdict of the DCDS, Heidelberg Appeal the Netherlands examined the accusations against Lomborg.On a total of 27 accusations that have been identified, two are not specific and one is not to the point.So at least 25 out of 27 accusations are not substantiated or are simply invalid.The inevitable overall impression of the debate is, not that Lomborg has deliberately been twisting arguments, but many of his opponents have.They found:.This is somewhat more than embarrassing.Using some historical examples it is argued that almost all opponents use discussion tactics, which come very near to those of dogmatically driven pseudo-scientists.and futhermore found: