Original sentence: A tiny minority of advocates for gender-neutral language argue that alegedly "sexist" usages should be banned by the government through the crimial justice system.Another tool they use is simply to make use of 'non-sexist language' themselves, thereby leading by example.But many advocates do support the enforcement of rules and policies against language they feel is sexist by schools and work places.In some cases, laws exist regarding the use of gender-neutral language in certain situations, such as job advertisements.Many editing houses, corporations, and government bodies have official policies in favour of in-house use of gender-neutral language.Some opponents of "non-sexist language" modification accept the basic premise that traditional use of gender in English reflects sexism, but argue that a change in language should evolve organically from changing public attitudes towards gender issues, rather than be achieved either by enforcement, or by persuasion.The majority of advocates for gender-neutral language generally prefer persuasion rather than enforcement
Edited sentence: A tiny minority of advocates for non-sexist language argue that these "sexist" usages should be banned.Another tool is simply to make use of 'non-sexist language' oneself, and lead by example.In addition to those who oppose any change, some opponents of 'non-sexist language' argue that a change in language should evolve organically from changing public attitudes towards gender issues, rather than be achieved either by enforcement, or by persuasion.In some cases, laws exist regarding the use of non-sexist language in certain situations, such as job advertisements.It is unclear how this would be achieved.Many editing houses, corporations, and government bodies have official policies in favour of in-house use of non-sexist language.The majority of advocates for 'non-sexist language' wish to proceed by persuasion rather than enforcement