Original sentence: In this light, the references in the medieval chronicles to the "Vlach" population in Pannonia do not constitute a conclusive evidence of the presence of romanized Dacians in the Carpathian Basin in the last quarter of the first millenium.Taking into account that modern Polish "Wloch" and "Wlochy" mean respectively "Italian" and "Italy", and modern Hungarian "olasz", deriving from "Vlach", means again "Italian", it is arguable that the "Vlach" references in the chronicles generally denoted Latin-speaking population fragments adjacent to early Slavic settlements in the Carpathian basin
Edited sentence: In this light, the references in the medieval chronicles to the "Vlach" population in Pannonia do not constitute a relevant evidence of the presence of romanized Dacians in the Carpathian Basin in the last quarter of the first millenium, but would merely indicate that the area's population included Romanic speaking people.Moreover, it is generally accepted that the term "vlach" referred to any Romanic population in (especially South-Eastern) Europe, and has no specific connotation with Dacians (for details see History of the term Vlach).Taking into account that modern Polish "Włoch" and "Włochy" mean respectively "Italian" and "Italy", and modern Hungarian "olasz", deriving from "Vlach", means again "Italian", it is arguable that the "Vlach" references in the chronicles generally denoted Latin-speaking population fragments adjacent to early Slavic settlements in the Carpathian basin