Original sentence: However, the book attracted significant controversy in Poland, with Polish right-wing historians, and in particular, those affiliated with the IPN, criticising it for what they said were glaring and numerous flaws of methodological and factual nature, and some being evidence of academic dishonesty.These reviews sparked some heated scholarly debate on the accuracy of the information presented in the book, and about the reviews themselves
Edited sentence: However, the book attracted significant controversy in Poland, with Polish right-wing historians, and in particular those affiliated with the IPN, criticising it for what they said were glaring and numerous flaws of methodological and factual nature, and some being evidence of academic dishonesty.These reviews sparked some heated scholarly debate on the accuracy of the information presented in the book, with most scholars seeing the IPN campaign as a state-coordinated effort to intimidate the authors