Original sentence: The Moscow Treaty diverges from START in two ways:  First, it limits actual warheads, whereas START I limits warheads only through declared attribution to their means of delivery (ICBMs, SLBMs, and Heavy Bombers)
Edited sentence: However, the underlying issue that many scholars question is whether President Bush actually wants the US to engage in non-proliferation.Statements and innuendo by the administration also suggests it willingness to deviate from a longstanding no first use policy and attack a non-nuclear adversary with battlefield nuclear weapons.The Moscow Treaty diverges from START in two profound ways:  First, it limits actual warheads, whereas START I limits warheads only through declared attribution to their means of delivery (ICBMs, SLBMs, and Heavy Bombers).This stance calls into question some of the terms of the Moscow Treaty