Original sentence: Compared to the T-34, each contemporary version of the M4 Sherman had better frontal armor.During the Korean War, US Shermans performed well against their T-34-85 adversaries, although a direct comparison is difficult due to the far superior training of US crews.The Sherman excelled in mechanical reliability.The later 76 mm verisons had comperable gun power to the Soviet 85mm.The only other Second World War tank produced in comparable numbers to the Sherman was the Soviet T-34 series, which many critics consider as a contender for best tank of World War II
Edited sentence: Compared to the T-34, each contemporary version of the M4 Sherman had better frontal Armor, the later high velocity 76 mm verisons had superior gun power to the Soviet 85mm, a radio in each tank, a gyrostabilized gun, greater reliability, and better armor protection.During the Korean War, US Shermans performed well against their T-34/85 adversaries, which was due to a combination of better training and better equipment such as gunsights and gun stabilization.The only other Second World War tank produced in comparable numbers to the Sherman was the Soviet T-34 series, which some critics consider as a contender for best tank of World War II, although it too had very high losses during the war