Original sentence: By contrast, universal common descent in the theory of evolution would suggest that there is only one holobaramin covering all organisms.For example, humans form a holobaramin, since (in creationist conceptions) they were created as a single kind and therefore share no ancestral or genetic relationship with other animals.That is, it consists of parts of two or more holobaramins and should be avoided, as it is comparable to a polyphyletic taxon in conventional systematics
Edited sentence: By contrast, the postulate of universal common descent in the theory of evolution would suggest that there is only one holobaramin covering all organisms.For example, humans form a holobaramin, since (in creationist theory) they were created as a single kind and therefore share no ancestral or genetic relationship with other animals.That is, it consists (through faulty analysis) parts of two or more holobaramins and should be avoided, as it is comparable to a polyphyletic taxon in conventional systematics