Original sentence: The members of the scientific community that reviewed Icons of Evolution have roundly rejected his claims and conclusions
Edited sentence: According to emeritus professor of biology, Dean Kenyon, San Francisco State University, Wells "has brilliantly exposed the exaggerated claims and deceptions that have persisted in standard textbook discussions of biological origins for many decades.Critics Rave Over Icons of Evolution: A Response to Published Reviews.Holt, Rinehart and Winston acknowledged that it re-evaluated the use of the peppered moth and Haeckel’s drawing of embryos icons from its textbook prior to publication.Myers case is not as well supported though.Professor of biology Paul Chien, University of San Francisco, writes: "Wells has done a great public service” by writing his book,.Some members of the scientific community that reviewed Icons of Evolution have rejected his claims and conclusions.The Real Truth about Jonathan Wells from the Discovery Institute.This has led to the question being asked "if the problems identified by Dr.Wells are nonexistent, why are some textbook writers already making changes.adding that the book’s “extensive coverage of all the icons of Darwinism… with extensive.research notes, makes this volume a valuable reference for a professional biologist