Original sentence: Gill told The Telegraph he objected to the use of a table by the prosecution showing that Letby was on duty for every investigated death, stating that statistically conclusions could not be drawn from that data.Gill was previously warned by British police that his attempts to discredit the case against Letby while the trial was still ongoing were a "blatant and serious contempt of court", but he chose to ignore this and so had to be visited in the Netherlands and instructed to stop and remove his online content.Neil Mackenzie KC, a lawyer specialising in medical negligence, expressed concerns to The Telegraph that the defence may not have sufficiently disputed the theory put forward by the prosecution
Edited sentence: Gill previously had to be warned by British police that his attempts to discredit the case against Letby while the trial was still ongoing were a "blatant and serious contempt of court", but he chose to ignore this and so had to be visited in the Netherlands and instructed to stop and remove his online content