Original sentence: Substantive methodological criticisms have been made of Delisle's work: among others, that her attributions of pseudonymous articles are often invalid, that she ignores articles which present more moderate opinions, that many of the articles cannot be found as referenced by her, that the extracts from the articles she selected often misrepresent the ideas in them, and that she presented an exploratory study as a test of several linked hypotheses (for example, she did not compare the frequency of antisemitic references in French Canadian publications with those in English Canadian ones of the same period).The magazine did admit that Lionel Groulx was an anti-Semite
Edited sentence: Substantive methodological criticisms have been made of Delisle's work: among others, that her attributions of pseudonymous articles are often invalid, that she ignores articles which present more moderate opinions, that the extracts from the articles she selected often misrepresent the ideas in them, and that she presented an exploratory study as a test of several linked hypotheses (for example, she did not compare the frequency of antisemitic references in French Canadian publications with those in English Canadian ones of the same period).Yet, the magazine grudgingly had to admit that the revered Lionel Groulx was indeed an anti-Semite