Original sentence: Behe's central assertion regarding Darwinian evolution is that it exists, but that it is better at disturbing existing metabolic pathways (referred to as 'molecular machinery') than making new ones, and therefore plays only a limited role in the development and diversification of life on Earth.Behe's methods, information and conclusions have been overwhelmingly rejected by the scientific community, and reviews by scientists, especially those working in the field of biology, have been highly critical, though some reviews from creationists and non-biologists have been more positive.Intelligent design has been overwhelmingly rejected by the scientific community and has been found by a United States district court to be a modern version of creationism.Thus, he asserts, known evolutionary mechanisms cannot be responsible for observed diversification from the last universal ancestor and thus only the intervention of a intelligent designer can adequately account for the diversity of life
Edited sentence: Because of its association with the principles common to western biblical theology, and also because it lacks scientific proofs, Intelligent Design has been rejected by the scientific community and has been found by a United States district court to be a modern version of creationism.Behe uses information regarding malaria, E.Behe's book subjects the underlying principles of Darwinism to scientific scrutiny, and makes the case that Darwinian evolution lacks essential proof and fails, in light of known data, to satisfy reasonable scientific standards.Behe's methods, information and conclusions have been rejected by members of the scientific community, and reviews by scientists, especially those working in the field of biology, have been highly critical, though some reviews from creationists and non-biologists have been more positive.Thus, he asserts, known evolutionary mechanisms cannot be responsible for observed diversification from the last universal ancestor and that, therefore, in the absence of scientific proof for Darwinian evolution, as it has been historically understood and taught, the notion of an intelligent designer cannot be rejected.coli and HIV, all of which are now more fully understood due to the sciences of genomics and proteomics, to support his central assertion that Darwinian evolution exists, but that it has demonstrated itself in these examples to be better at disturbing existing metabolic pathways (referred to as 'molecular machinery') than making new ones, and therefore plays only a limited role in the development and diversification of life on Earth