Original sentence: Anarchism and communism (as in the final stage of social development according to Marxist theory) are social systems that employ a form of direct democracy, and have no state independent of the people themselves.Historical examples of this include the USSR under the CPSU before its collapse in 1991, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, and the Philippines under Ferdinand Marcos.In the United States:.On the one hand, Winston Churchill said:.On the other, Edmund Burke:.The majority often taxes the minority who are wealthy at progressively higher rates, with the intention that the wealthy will incur a larger tax burden for social purposes.While democracy per se implies only a system of government defined and legitimized by elections, modern democracy can be characterized more fully by the following institutions:
Edited sentence: Anarchism and communism (as in the ultimate stage of social development according to Marxist theory) are social systems that employ a form of direct democracy, and have no state independent of the people themselves.And, Edmund Burke:.Historical examples of this include the USSR under the CPSU before its collapse in 1991, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, the Philippines under Ferdinand Marcos, and the U.In the United States the "tyranny of the majority" matter was anticipated in the formation of the state, which was therefore designed with relatively circumscribed democratic institutions resulting in a history of patronage politics.In this example, the wealthy minority sees their accumulation of wealth as absolutely due to their own efforts and gifts alone, and therefore perceive progressive taxation and social redistribution to be a form of astonishing tyranny.It can be argued that the following problems are not strictly the result of the tyranny of the majority, but can be connected to a general lack of practiced public spiritedness resulting from limitations on democracy.It is easy to find published instances of their sentiments.Most world leaders have come from elite classes, and have been very apprehensive about the prospect of rule by their economic inferiors.The majority often taxes the minority who are wealthy at progressively higher rates, because they subscribe to an economic theory that holds that wealth creation is social and if wealth is appropriated by a particular class, then it is only fair that the wealth be at least somewhat redistributed.While democracy developed through movements against oligarchy and monarchy, and thus traditionally implies only a system of government defined and legitimized by elections, modern democracy can be characterized more fully by the following institutions:.Winston Churchill said:.under Bush