Original sentence: One regards the characters and events of that chronology as real people and incidents which can be assigned to a specific place in time.The latter is the most popular in academic circle today, so most modern chronologies generally go no further back than the birth of Abraham.The nature of Biblical Chronology is disputed by two schools of thought.The other regards them as myths based on historical people and incidents which cannot be assigned to a specific place in time, especially those prior to the birth of Abraham
Edited sentence: Modern chronologies generally go no further back than the birth of Abraham.Most of religious history has made a record of time and calendar for these characters.Some feel that Bible chronology is not a discussion of where characters such as Adam and Noah are placed in time; they feel that the Bible chronology must only be regarded as what actual characters or events existed.There is a conflict in definition because of debating reality and myth