Original sentence: David Wolpert and Gregory Benford suggest that there is no conflict between the two strategies; Newcomb's problem, they say, represents two different games with different probabilistic outcomes, and the conflict arises because of this imprecise definition of the game.The optimal strategy for either of the games they describe is independent of: the predictor's infallibility; questions of causality; determinism and free will
Edited sentence: David Wolpert and Gregory Benford suggest that there is no conflict between the two strategies; Newcomb's problem, they claim, actually represents two different games with different probabilistic outcomes, and the conflict arises because of this imprecise definition of the game.They also note that the optimal strategy for either of the games they describe does not depend on the infallibility of the predictor, and the questions of causality, determinism, and free will do not factor into these strategies