Edited sentence: According to Dreger, the allegations of misconduct could accurately be described as "harassment", and an "anti-Bailey campaign".Alice Dreger, a bioethicist, published an account of the controversy in the Archives of Sexual Behavior.Dreger also reported that while there was no definitive evidence to refute the allegation of sexual misconduct, datestamps on e-mails between Bailey and his ex-wife indicated that he was at her home looking after their two children at the time the misconduct was said to have occurred.Dreger included additional details in Galileo's Middle Finger, an analysis of modern clashes between scientists and activists whose beliefs are challenged by them.Dreger wrote that of the four women who complained to Northwestern, two acknowledged that they were aware they would be included in Bailey's book in their letter to the university.In her documented account of the Bailey case, she concluded that a small group of self-styled activists tried to bury a politically challenging scientific theory by attacking Bailey: "These critics, rather than restrict themselves to the argument over the ideas, had charged Bailey with a whole host of serious crimes," but that "what they claimed about Bailey simply wasn't true.The book generated considerable controversy.The journal published in the same issue 23 commentaries regarding multiple aspects of the controversy, including criticism of Dreger's analysis.The most detailed investigation into that controversy was reported by Alice Dreger, a bioethicist and historian, known for her support of intersex rights.The other two were not described in the book