Original sentence: Cohen argues in other sections of this book that it is, and has been, unwise for Marxists to avoid normative political philosophy.Cohen asks, in his book of the same name, If you're an egalitarian how come you're so rich.He comes to the conclusion that although the proletarian is individually free to leave the working class, they are not so collectively.However, using the tools of contemporary analysis above has led Cohen (and other Analytical Marxists) towards liberal egalitarianism.In "History, Labour, and Freedom", Cohen studies the problem of freedom in a capitalist society.In this book, Cohen argues that while liberal egalitarianism might express the correct principles of justice, it arbitrarily and inconsistently limits the scope of those principles
Edited sentence: Cohen argued in other sections of this book that it is, and has been, unwise for Marxists to avoid normative political philosophy.Cohen asked, in his book of the same name, If you're an egalitarian how come you're so rich.He came to the conclusion that although the proletarian is individually free to leave the working class, they are not so collectively.However, using the tools of contemporary analysis above led Cohen (and other Analytical Marxists) towards liberal egalitarianism.In "History, Labour, and Freedom", Cohen studied the problem of freedom in a capitalist society.In this book, Cohen argued that while liberal egalitarianism might express the correct principles of justice, it arbitrarily and inconsistently limits the scope of those principles