Original sentence: An example of this sort of critic is John Searle who, in his Chinese room argument, states that he cannot find anything that could be recognised as conscious experience in a system that relies solely on motions of things from place to place.As Peter Hankins points out, "Dennett's broad range means he's said useful things on a broader range of topics than anyone else.Compounding this is the scope of the theory.However, Dennett is not denying the existence of the mind or of consciousness, only what he considers a naive view of them.The point of contention is whether Dennett's own definitions are indeed more accurate
Edited sentence: An example of this sort of redefinition is found in Dennett's response to John Searle who, in his Chinese room argument, states that he cannot find anything that could be recognised as conscious experience in a system that relies solely on motions of things from place to place.However, Dennett is not denying the existence of the mind or of consciousness instead he redefines these terms to be consistent with consciousness as behaviour