Original sentence: A candidate can know people from which polling station voted for him and people from which did not.For e.This problem was well-evident in Indian general elections, 2004; the day after the election results were declared, The Times of India, Mumbai carried statistics about which areas in Mumbai voted for which candidate.people from Kandivali gave more votes to Govinda, while people from Borivali polled more votes for his opponent Ram Naik
Edited sentence: A candidate can know how many people from a polling station voted for him.For example, in Indian general elections, 2004; the day after the election results were declared, The Times of India, Mumbai carried statistics about which areas in Mumbai voted for which candidate.People from Kandivali gave more votes to Govinda, while people from Borivali polled more votes for his opponent Ram Naik.This is a significant issue particularly if lop-sided votes for/against a candidate are cast in individual polling stations