Original sentence: Mark Perakh consider Ross's arguments against evolution to be pseudoscientific.Some of Ross' work – particularly his criticism of evolution – is faulted by some in the scientific community as being little different from YEC, but Ross states his work provides a better fit for the data than either the YEC or the conventional models.The idea that the universe has finely tuned parameters which cannot be significantly altered without destroying the possibility of life is referred to by cosmology as the anthropic principle
Edited sentence: However, his entire scientific output consists of three co-authored astronomy papers, a singularly authored paper, all published between 1975 and 1977 plus a 1970 commentary to a paper by M.Ross likes to give the impression that he has impressive scientific credentials.Scientists consider Ross's arguments against evolution to be pseudoscientific.Some of Ross' work – particularly his criticism of evolution – is faulted by some in the mainstream scientific community as being little different from YEC, but Ross states his work provides a better fit for the data than either the YEC or the conventional models.The idea that the universe has finely tuned parameters which cannot be significantly altered without destroying the possibility of life is referred to by mainstream cosmology as the anthropic principle