Original sentence: According to Günter Gillessen, the facts did paint a picture different from that of a bloodthirsty and unrepentant Nazi judge, a view confirmed by Adolf Harms, who worked as a judge alongside Filbinger, including the Gröger case, who described Filbinger as "no fierce dog", "definitely not a Nazi" and as someone with a decidedly negative attitude towards the then current political leadership".It should be noted that others do describe Harms as a "Scharfmacher", a baiter
Edited sentence: According to Günter Gillessen, the facts did paint a picture different from that of a bloodthirsty and unrepentant Nazi judge, a view confirmed by Adolf Harms, who worked as a judge alongside Filbinger, including the Gröger case, who described Filbinger as "no sharp dog", "definitely not a Nazi" and as someone with a decidedly negative attitude towards the then current political leadership".It should be noted that others do paint judge Harms as the sharp dog not only in this case, so it's somewhat odd that he comes to his defense