Edited sentence: Any persistant attempt to correct this usually results in the person concerned being blocked for 'reverting Aschlafly's edits'.Dawkins is not a 'real professor'.Despite extensive evidence presented on the Talk Page for the article refuting this claim, and Andrew Schlafly apparantly being in a distinct minority of people who are making this claim, any attempt to correct the inaccuracies in the article are quickly reverted, often by Andrew Schlafly, and no evidence that has not already been comprehensively refuted is presented backing this claim up, even when such evidence is directly requested.For example, in Conservapedia's article about Professor Richard Dawkins, Conservapedia makes the claim that Prof.Some of this apparant bias seems to stem from Andrew Schlafly himself