Edited sentence: An inherent elasticity of demand for wireless access forces ISPs to evolve their service offerings, including prices.Expansive government technology projects almost always exceed their budget estimates due to a variety of factors.Furthermore, government provision of Mu-Fi services carries signficantly more risk than for core utility services such as water:.Granting right-of-ways to a single vendor will distort competition in the market intended to generate revenue for the municipality, thereby putting these revenue forecasts at risk.If consumers adopt faster, less-expensive services as these technologies change and improve, revenue forecasts will suffer.It also appears that only a few service providers have been successful in terms of achieving a return on their investment.It is unclear whether, among the several projects announced to date, any have succeeded in fulfilling their initial goals.Mu-Fi, however, must compete directly with cable and DSL services already made available by market providers.Risk of providing these core services is low since competition is non-existant.Services geared to disadvantaged consumers will likely demand ongoing government subsidy.The rate of change in wireless Internet technology suggests an elevated risk of obsolescence, which challenges budget assumptions