Original sentence: 469 (2005)), in which a 5 to 4 majority interpreted "public use" to include "public purpose.This argument may have to be re-examined, however, given the Kelo decision in 2005 (Kelo v
Edited sentence: 469 (2005)), in which a 5 to 4 majority arbitrarily changed "public use" to now mean "public purpose.This argument may have to be re-examined, however, given the Kelo decision in 2005 (Suzette Kelo v