Original sentence: Amnesty International has been accused of ideological bias by many governments, including those of, Israel, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the People's Republic of China, Vietnam, Russia and the United States, have attacked Amnesty International for what they assert is one-sided reporting or a failure to treat threats to security as a mitigating factor
Edited sentence: A University of Illinois professor of international law, Francis Boyle,  who was a member of the board of Amnesty International USA at the end of the 1980s/early 1990s, claims that Amnesty International USA acted in ways closely related to United States and United Kingdom foreign policy interests.Amnesty International has been accused of ideological bias by many governments, including those of, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the People's Republic of China, Vietnam, Russia and the United States, have attacked Amnesty International for what they assert is one-sided reporting or a failure to treat threats to security as a mitigating factor.Amnesty International has been accused of ideological bias by the government of Israel.Boyle stated his suspicion that the International Secretariat of Amnesty International, based geographically in London, UK, was also subject to this bias.He attributes the alleged links between Amnesty International and US and UK foreign policy interests to the relatively large financial contribution of Amnesty International USA to AI's international budget, which he estimated at 20%.He stated that Amnesty, along with other human rights organisations in the US, failed to sufficiently criticise the Sabra and Shatila Massacre in Lebanon