Original sentence: "  They point to the following as evidence of bias:.Many viewers criticize it as having a conservative political bias; supporters claim that it produces objective reporting and is more balanced than what they consider as predominantly liberal United States media.O'Reilly acknowledges his show is not so much news, but more an editorial program.Some critics accuse O'Reilly for frequently using incendiary, emotive, or nationalist rhetoric toward those who hold disagreeing positions, such as the time he suggested terrorists blow up San Francisco.This criticism has persisted throughout the life of Fox News, and critics have come to call FNC the "Faux News Channel," "GOP TV," and the "Fascist News Network
Edited sentence: " O'Reilly counters that his show is not so much "news", but a news analysis program.Critics point to the following as evidence of the alleged bias:.Many viewers critisize it as having a conservative political bias, although supporters claim that it produces objective reporting and is more balanced than what they consider as predominantly liberal United States media.Some critics accuse O'Reilly for frequently using incendiary, emotive, or nationalist rhetoric toward those who hold disagreeing positions, such as accusing Senator Dick Durbin of "slamming America" and "condemning his own country" over Durbin's criticism of the conditions at the United States' Guantanamo Bay facility in Cuba when Durban (referring to United States soldiers) said, "you would most certainly believe (torturing of prisoners) must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags or some mad regime - Pol Pot or others - that had no concern for human beings.This criticism has persisted throughout the life of Fox News, with the first recorded criticism of FNC's news programming as being conservative Howard Rosenberg's October 11, 1996 column in the Los Angeles Times