Original sentence: As such Naik is not accused of direct involvement in terrorism, but following known deadly terrorists, among others, have been inspired by his preaching.Naik has been denied entry into United Kingdom and Canada since June 2010 owing to false allegations on his personal views of Islamic Terrorism.On June 11, 2010 Naik was found to condone terrorism by the UK Home secretary, Theresa May.She judged this on a  widely watched YouTube video, which was edited to make it seem he said the following:.The YouTube video is wrongly dated 2007, when the talk actually took place in Singapore in the year 1996
Edited sentence: At times Naik appears to condone terrorism.In a widely watched 2007 [YouTube] video, he says the following:.It is not suggested that Naik is directly involved in terrorism, but following known terrorists have reportedly been inspired by his preaching:.Naik has been denied entry into United Kingdom and Canada since June 2010 owing to his soft approach on Islamic Terrorism