Original sentence: One side effect is that it is possible for a candidate to win more popular votes but get less electors elected to the Electoral College, meaning that the person with less popular votes but more electors gets elected to the presidency.Some states with complex regional electorates choose to elect a head of state by means of an electoral college rather than a direct popular election.The United States is a noted case where, to avoid the dominance of urban and east coast based electorates at the expense of smaller communities, the President is elected by an electoral college, made up of electors representing the states; each state has a number of electors equivalent to its total Congressional representation (House of Representatives members from the state plus its two senators).This has occurred on a number of occasions in the United States, most recently in the U.presidential election, 2000 when  Al Gore won more popular votes but lost to the Electoral College victor, George W
Edited sentence: Al Gore) can beat another (George W.Bush) in the popular vote, but lose in the Electoral College.Electoral College) systems the representation is not even designed to proportionally represent the populace, and in these cases such anomalies will be even more common.In almost any voting system using an electoral college (or any representative body), it is possible for the popular vote to have one preference, while the electoral college has another.In many (including the U.Several times through U.history, as in the U.presidential election, 2000 one candidate (e