Original sentence: However, depending on election timing, it is argued, there may be a significant drop-off in voter turnout in the second round and it is possible that the nominal "majority" winner of the second round may receive fewer votes than the loser received in the first round of voting.In both cases such ballots, with all choices eliminated, are considered exhausted and don't count for or against the winner, unless the election still requires a  majority of ballots cast in that race, as with the process introduced in the Vermont legislature in [supply year when sourcing].It is possible for a winner to be chosen with a majority of ballots indicating a preference between the two finalists, rather than a majority of the total ballots originally cast
Edited sentence: However, depending on election timing, it is argued, there may be a significant drop-off in voter turnout in the second round and, it is argued, it is possible that the winner of the second round receives fewer votes than the loser received in the first round of voting.In both cases such ballots, with all choices eliminated, are considered exhausted and don't count for or against the winner, unless the election still requires a true majority, as with the process introduced in the Vermont legislature in [supply year when sourcing].It is possible for a winner to be chosen without a majority of the total ballots in some cases where enough voters have all their ranked candidates eliminated, so the definition of "majority" in this argument is different from the standard definition