Original sentence: " In Prager's article about Ellison he called the Qur'an "the bible of Islam" and Mein Kampf "the Nazis' bible", this lead his critics to charge that he was equating the two documents, and that he was implying that both were designed to induce worldwide violence.Responding to the charges that he equated the Qur'an to "Mein Kampf" and exhibited Islamophobia, Prager wrote in his Dec.That article says that while terrorist acts do not suggest "we are fighting a billion Muslims" or "that all or even most Muslims are bad people", it concludes that "It does suggest, however, that the dominant forces within Islam are bad at this time; that Muslims who see this evil in their midst have not mobilized any counterforce either out of…fear for their lives or group solidarity.They do not believe that Prager would have used these statement if Ellison were not a Muslim
Edited sentence: " In Prager's article about Ellison he called the Qur'an "the bible of Islam" and Mein Kampf "the Nazis' bible", this lead his critics to charge that he was equating the two documents, and that he was implying that both were designed to induce worldwide violence, although no evidence showing the Koran as anything but an inducement to violence was offered.Responding to the charges that he equated the Qur'an to "Mein Kampf" and exhibited the fictitious malady, Islamophobia, Prager wrote in his Dec.That article says that while terrorist acts do not suggest "we are fighting a billion Muslims" or "that all or even most Muslims are bad people," it concludes that "...[i]t does suggest, however, that the dominant forces within Islam are bad at this time; that Muslims who see this evil in their midst have not mobilized any counterforce either out of…fear for their lives or group solidarity.They do not believe that Prager would have used these statement if Ellison were not a Muslim, although this is considered a rather "precious" criticism (since Islam was the topic, what other allusions would Prager use