Original sentence: After the result Galbally suggested that Barlow would have been found not guilty had medical evidence he wanted introduced been admitted by the court.Galbally had not been in court for the final decision; Australian officials reported he had left Malaysia the night of 17 December after apologising to the Supreme Court over a row over contempt
Edited sentence: After the argument Singh finally left the room, warning Galbally over his shoulder not to criticise Malaysia's British-based legal system or suggest Australia's was supierior.After the result was publicised Galbally suggested that Barlow would have been found not guilty had the medical evidence he wanted introduced been admitted by the court.At the appeal Singh had argued that Barlow's shivering could be attributed to his existing medical condition, or a foreigner's "unease" at being confronted by police.Galbally believed Barlow's shivering could be attributed to a spinal injury, however Singh reasoned that this was already adequately covered by medical evidence at the trial and in the existing appeal.Galbally had urged Singh to file an additional ground for appeal for their client.Galbally was not in court for the final decision of the appeal; Australian officials reported he had left Malaysia the night of 17 December after apologising to the Supreme Court over a row over contempt.On 16 December a row broke out between Singh and Galbally in the court room and was witneesed by press and court staff.Singh had said there was "little point" doing this, as no fresh evidence was involved.The argument occurred after the judges had adjourned for the day and left the court, and lasted about five minutes