Original sentence: Craig illustrates his point using the example of Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel.Granting the strict logical consistency of post-Cantorian, axiomatized infinite set theory, Craig concludes that the existence of an actually infinite number of things is metaphysically impossible due to the consequential absurdities he says arise.It is Craig's view there is absurdity in adding an additional guest to a fully occupied hotel yet having the same number of guests, infinity, both before and after the addition
Edited sentence: Craig illustrates this point using the example of Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel.Craig points out that it is absurd to add an additional guest to a fully occupied hotel and the absurd result that the hotel has the same number of guests, infinity, both before and after adding the additional guest.Granting the strict logical consistency of post-Cantorian, axiomatized infinite set theory, Craig concludes that the existence of an actually infinite number of things is metaphysically impossible due to the consequential absurdities that arise