Original sentence: Followers contend that in a secular democracy it makes little sense to allow Muslims, for example, to marry more than once, but prosecute Hindus for doing the same.However the fact is that even Hindu pilgrimages are funded (though meagerly) by the Government.The Uniform Civil Code is opposed by Muslims, Christians and parties like the Indian National Congress and The Communist Party of India(Marxist).The amended laws, more in tune with the Shariat, reduced the rights that divorced Muslim women previously had.The amendment of the Indian constitution by Rajiv Gandhi to overturn a Supreme Court judgment under pressure from the conservative Muslims incensed the Hindutva supporters
Edited sentence: Followers contend that in a secular democracy it makes little sense to allow Muslims, for example, to marry more than once, but to prosecute Hindus for doing the same.However the fact is that even Hindu pilgrimages are funded(but, meagrely) by the Government.The Uniform Civil Code is opposed tooth and nail by Muslims, Christians and the so-called "secular" parties like the Indian National Congress and The Communist Party of India(Marxist).The amended laws, more in tune with the Shariat, reduced rights divorced Muslim women previously had.The amendment of the Indian constitution by Rajiv Gandhi to overturn a Supreme Court judgment under pressure from the Islamic fundamentalists incensed the Hindutva supporters