Original sentence: However, since those persons within lower income brackets may receive subsidies and welfare which offset the amount of work they must do to survive, in some cases, this argument may be a fallacy.If one's children cannot make enough money to survive, they starve.One's choices consist of the workhouse prison, or the labor market.The only rights that a person has are the rights he gains on the labor market.The rich have wealth enough to live while the poor and working people have to be subjected to market discipline.Wage slavery can be described as a lack of rights
Edited sentence: However, since those persons within lower income brackets receive subsidies and welfare which are proportionally much larger than what they pay in the form of taxes, this argument is largely a fallacy (assuming, of course, that the lower income brackets are earning a fair share -as opposed to what the market allows - of the wealth they are producing, i.If your children cannot make enough money to survive, they starve.The only rights you get are the rights you gain on the labor market.The rich receive protection from the government in the form of corporate welfare subsidizing them while the poor and working people have to be subjected to market discipline.Wage Slavery can be described as a lack of rights.Your choices consist of the workhouse prison, or the labor market.they are not being exploited as a result of lack of empowerment or marginalization by the owners of the means of production)