Original sentence: But Durrance tells her his blindness is incurable and frees her for Harry.Critics complained that the film did not explore the characters sufficiently, and had historical inaccuracies in uniform dress.The British infantry square was broken in the battle of Abu Klea and the British are forced to retreat.The central battle is more accurately treated in the film Khartoum (1966).The film depicts a British loss at Abu Klea, instead of a victory.The novel tells the story of a British officer, Harry Feversham, who resigns from his commission in the Royal North Surrey Regiment just after Lord Garnet Wolseley's 1882 expedition to Egypt to suppress the rising of Colonel Ahmed Orabi
Edited sentence: But Durrance tells her his blindness is curable (a white lie) and frees her for Harry.Critics complained that the film did not explore the characters sufficiently, and had historical inaccuracies in uniform dress and a surreal plot (aka the disguised with red tunics fuzzy wuzzy cavalry charge is something simply unbelievable...) In fact it is a waste of talented actors, time and money.The British infantry square was broken in the battle of Abu Klea and the British are forced to retreat (which in real History did not happen as they won, the square reformed and they pushed on to Abu Kru were they won again before reaching the Nile... finally.The central battle is more accurately treated in the film Khartoum (1966) (but the camels were never used as living ramparts).The film depicts a British loss at Abu Klea, instead of a victory which is somewhat ludicrous.The novel tells the story of a British officer, Harry Feversham, who resigns from his commission in the Royal North Surrey Regiment just before Lord Garnet Wolseley's 1882 expedition to Egypt to suppress the rising of Colonel Ahmed Orabi