Edited sentence: "  Is this a rebuke to the West Coast Court, and an intimation that the Court is now prepared to extend the Lawrence liberty beyond the sexuality/privacy/family context.And yet it seems clearly aimed at West Coast, although the case is not cited in Lawrence.And yet the Lawrence Court explicitly stated that "Had those who drew and ratified the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendment known the components of liberty in its manifold possibilities, they might have been more specific.As the Constitution endures, persons in every generation can invoke its principles in their own search for greater freedom.Casey that its "obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate our own moral code.Is the West Coast liberty the same as the Lawrence liberty.It affirmed its statement in Planned Parenthood v.It is universally granted now that Lawrence stands for something else besides an application of the scrutiny regime.It seems to reflect conservative dissatisfication with West Coast Hotel, and yet conservatives such as Justice Thomas dissented from the holding.Liberty is precisely what was given new rights in Lawrence.Nor does the Court say it is.The Court never uses "minimum" or "scrutiny" in the opinion, and does not use "rational" with respect to the new liberty test it establishes.The Court served notice in Lawrence that it may not be done defining the indicia of liberty.The idea that a regulation cannot be Constitutional which "furthers no legitimate state interest" takes "furthers" from intermediate scrutiny and "legitimate" from minimum scrutiny.They did not presume to have this insight.They knew times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress.This is not a test of the scrutiny regime.West Coast Hotel is usually cited for the proposition that economic regulation is only subject to minimum scrutiny, while other facts (such as freedom of speech and privacy) enjoy a higher standard.West Coast proceeded on the notion that an "absolute and uncontrollable liberty" was not in the Constitution