Original sentence: Gish has also been criticised for using a standardized presentation during debates.Gish has been characterized as using a rapid-fire approach during a debate, presenting arguments and changing topics very quickly.Ian Plimer, head of the Geology department at the University of Newcastle, Australia, debated Gish in 1988.While undertaking research for a debate with Gish, Michael Shermer noted that for several debates Gish's opening, assumptions about his opponent, slides and even jokes remained identical
Edited sentence: "  This type of debate style is unfortunately the norm from evolutionists who are unable to defend the scientific evidence and thus must engage in ad hominem attacks on the Creationists.As an example of the ad hominem attacked previously mentioned, Ian Plimer, head of the Geology department at the University of Newcastle, Australia, debated Gish in 1988.Because of Dr.But it is understandable that one would naturally develop a standardized means for engaging in that many debates.For example, Gish has been characterized as using a rapid-fire approach during a debate, presenting arguments and changing topics very quickly.For this reason, evolutionists are often encouraged not to debate Creationists in the public forum.Gish has also been criticized for using a standardized presentation during debates.Gish has participated in approximately 300 debates, and it is well known that he wins most of them.Gish wins his debates on scientific merit alone.Gish's overwhelming success in the public debate forum, those opposing him have issued mostly ad hominem attacks against his character and style of debate.He purposely does not bring the Bible or Christianity into the debate to keep his opponents from making the straw-man argument that Creationism is strictly religion void of scientific evidence.His debates are almost entirely scientifically based.One critic and Gish debate opponent Michael Shermer, noted that while undertaking research for a debate with Gish, that for several debates Gish's opening, assumptions about his opponent, slides and even jokes remained identical.The arrogance of some of those on the evolutionary side is regrettable, but is not a deterrent to the Creationists who are determined to challenge the faith-based, religious beliefs of hard-core evolutionists