Original sentence: Those who doubt the prophecy's authenticity claim that the prophecy's mottos fit the earlier popes much better than they do the popes elected after the document's discovery, and that whatever similarities exist between the later popes and their mottos are a product of coincidence and the mottos' vagueness; that is to say, the later prophecies are susceptible to a confirmation bias
Edited sentence: Like any text that claims to be prophetic however, with enough creative thinking and sneaky rewording (e.Prophecy-in-retro is not prophecy at all but simply confirmation bias and as such, this prophecy should be taken with a healthy dose of skepticism.Those who doubt the prophecy's authenticity claim that the prophecy's mottos fit the earlier popes much better than they do the popes elected after the document's discovery, and that whatever similarities exist between the later popes and their mottos are a product of coincidence and the mottos' vagueness.with John Paul I and the twisted rewording of De medietate Lunae, when no reason to interpret it otherwise exists) any line or any phrase can be made to fit the events