Original sentence: "Because (Wikipedia) is a radically free, open project, it attracts an anarchistic element," Larry Sanger, the co-founder of Wikipedia admitted to Wired News."Fortunately, most of us are willing to take a definite stand against vandalism ... and to get rid of it instantly".I mean, what if I had instead written "My boss is a big fat **** and his phone number is ****".Sarah Lane, presenter of "Sarah's Blog Report", part of the Screen Savers TV program, "vandalised" the Wikipedia page on monkeypox, while on air, by writing "Sarah Lane is totally cool and does not have monkeypox".She later wrote that "Although this excites me in its ease and simplicity, it's a little frightening.Sure, somebody would delete it, but this calls for some seriously dedicated moderators"
Edited sentence: Although the open nature of the project enables this activity, it also works against it.Another drawback is that many edits are made by people who have no intention of making useful contributions, but instead add nonsense like "fdghhjk", or other unencyclopedic content.Every contributor has the ability to undo, or revert, such edits whenever they occur.For example, in articles on topics that are unfamiliar to most of the contributors, the accuracy and neutrality are questionable.However, this is not usually necessary.If this becomes too much work, a page can sometimes be "protected", so that only administrators can edit the page.Some participants of wikipedia argue that their experience has shown that over time these drawbacks will be reduced, as the quality and balance of individual articles improves.There are some drawbacks of the wide open nature of Wikipedia.This is often described as "vandalism"