Original sentence: " David Ehrlich of IndieWire gave the film a "C+" and praised what he described as its ambition, saying: "It almost doesn't matter that the movie is too emotionally prescriptive to have any real power, or too high on imagination to leave any room for wonder; DuVernay evinces such faith in who she is and what she's doing that A Wrinkle in Time remains true to itself even when everything on screen reads false." On Metacritic, which assigns normalized rating to reviews, the film has a weighted average score of 53 out of 100, based on 50 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews"." Vince Mancini of Uproxx gave the film a negative review, saying, "...if anything, the trouble with Wrinkle is that you never really get a sense of DuVernay's personal touch.Alex Hudson of Exclaim.Alonso Duralde of TheWrap praised the film's visuals and performances, writing, "Awash in bold colors, bright patterns and ebullient kids, director Ava DuVernay's new take on A Wrinkle in Time dazzles its way across time and space even if it doesn't quite stick the landing.Both attempt to be so broad and universal that they feel disconnected from anything human.But universality doesn't work that way, no matter how much you tell everyone to think like a kid.In fact, it feels a lot like Brad Bird's big budget, equally smarmy 2015 Disney film, Tomorrowland.On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 39%, based on 244 reviews, and an average rating of 5.2/10.Rather than a family classic, all we get is a perfectly fine kids movie.gave the film a 5 out of 10, saying that it felt "like a missed opportunity
Edited sentence: " On Metacritic, which assigns normalized rating to reviews, the film has a weighted average score of 53 out of 100, based on 50 different critics from multiple publications, indicating "mixed or average reviews".On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of only 39%, based on 244 reviews, and an average rating of 5.2/10