Original sentence: In 1988 Ferdinand, Duke of Castro and Prince Sixtus Henry of Bourbon-Parma joined Henri's lawsuit in reference to the use of the title Duke of Anjou, but not in respect to the coat-of-arms, judgment being rendered on December 21, 1988 by the Tribunal de grand instance of Paris.The court ruled that the lawsuit was inadmissible because the title's legal existence could not be proven; that neither the plaintiff (Henri) nor the intervenors (Fernando and Sixtus) had established their claims to the title; and that Henri was not injured from the use of the plain arms of France by a Spanish Bourbon
Edited sentence: In 1988 Ferdinand, Duke of Castro and Prince Sixtus Henry of Bourbon-Parma joined Henri's lawsuit in reference to the use of the title Duke of Anjou, but not in respect to the coat-of-arms.On December 21, 1988, the Tribunal de grand instance of Paris gave its judgement that the lawsuit was inadmissible.The court noted that neither the plaintiff (Henri) nor the intervenors (Fernando and Sixtus) themselves used the title Duke of Anjou and the plain of arms of France