Original sentence: ) takes a skeptical view.15,000 World Scientists' Call for Action (1997) is not strictly relevant to IPCC, but is supportive of the Kyoto treaty.17,000 signatories of the Oregon Petition Project (states that This is the website that completely knocks the wind out of the enviro's sails) who believe there are flawed ideas in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.1997 Leipzig Declaration On Global Climate Changescientist.However, this petition has been rejected by the US National Academy of Science and Scientific American found that it contains a number of bogus names.Most scientists involved in climate research believe that the IPCC reports accurately summarise the state of knowledge.Some scientists and scientific organizations have objected and made public comments to that effect.The Myth of Scientific Consensus on Global Warming asserts that there is no consensus
Edited sentence: 15,000 World Scientists' Call for Action (1997) (not strictly relevant to IPCC, but is supportive of the Kyoto treaty).17,000 signatories of the Oregon Petition Project (Self description: This is the website that completely knocks the wind out of the enviro's sails) who believe there are flawed ideas in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.However, this petition has been rejected by the US National Academy of Science and proven to contain many bogus names by Scientific American.Most scientists involved in climate research have accepted that the IPCC reports accurately summarise the state of knowledge and have felt no need to comment publicly.The Myth of Scientific Consensus on Global Warming (asserts no consensus).The skeptical 1997 Leipzig Declaration On Global Climate Change (but how many signers are really climate-related scientist.Those few who have objected, however, have made a considerable amount of noise