Original sentence: Anyone who knows anything about corporation law knows that the purpose of a corporation is to sheld investors and corporate officials from personal liability for the acts of the corporation.Association insurance provides not only for a board member's legal expense, but any judgment attained against them.At their own expense, a homeowner-member may sue a board of directors for perceived breach of duty.I am puzzled as to why this passage:.This being the case, demanding proof that this general principle, applicable to all corporations, applies specifically to HOA officiers seems, in my opion, to be a biased demand designed to protect HOAs unfairly.[citation needed] Homeowners must pay out of pocket for any case they bring to court and risk being personally liable for any judgment and/or Association's legal fees as well as their own, the prevailing party being responsible for liability and legal expenses when judgment is rendered.has been marked as needing a citation