Edited sentence: (It is therefore important for recipients of global-warming funding to keep the public ignorant of facts and no longer questioning, with such tactics as hoping for limited news coverage and scrubbing of information from Wikipedia.)  Wikipedia's page on Arctic shrinkage, which has little actual history in its supposed "history" section, and no mention of the 1920s discussions of the contemporary lack of habitat for arctic species as ice cover was shrinking—or the false nature of the claim that ice was thick and continuous in the 1950s.Alternatively, waiting for the ice to return—as it did following a similar Arctic shrinkage in the 1920s—is a possibility.The downside of this approach is that it would likely hurt the global-warming industry and limit funds for research and lobbying efforts when the public realizes that the "disaster" of Arctic shrinkage has previously occurred and gone away without intervention.—strongly assists in this, thanks to the diligent efforts of page guardians