Original sentence: " by Greg Rushford (Milken Institute Review, 2002).(It also favors the production of export goods over goods for domestic consumption.)  In the short run, this results in lesser availability of consumer goods; in the long run, it may drive down market prices received by those producers who do not wish to use the fairtrade-certified distributors, thus making life harder for workers in the same industries the movement aims to help (while further enriching the distributors).A final concern is the intimidation that has sometimes been used to get retailers to switch to selling fairtrade products exclusively.All told, it might be more effective for people to pay market price for products while donating money to poverty-relieving charities, than for the donated money to be tied to a specific product.Although they promise that higher prices in stores equate to higher wages for producers, some fairtrade-certified distributors are extremely non-transparent, refusing to provide information on what portion of the extra price paid by consumers for their products actually reaches the producers.Certification is based on wages and labor conditions, not on retail price; so a company could, while indeed providing good employment for its workers, also be making a hefty profit (consumers would falsely assume that the high prices were necessary for meeting the fairtrade standards).From simple threats of bad publicity, to more active picketing and protests against individual stores, fairtrade advocates have at times aimed to deny consumers a choice between cheaper "free trade" products and the fairtrade ones.However, this raises another concern: paying producers more than the market price for their products can have unintended side effects.It is clear that, even if fairtrade distributors are making an unusually large profit for themselves and their causes, they do pay their producers well, as the fairtrade label guarantees.Some fairtrade-certified companies have voiced support for Communist and even Terrorist organizations, which raises concerns about whether consumers seeking to help the Third World might be unwittingly funding human rights abuse.Some feel that these tactics should not be rewarded, no matter how well-intentioned the goals of those who use them.The practice would, in neoclassical economics, be expected to lead to inefficient overproduction of the fairtrade products: artificially high prices for one good can result in laborers choosing to produce that good instead of producing something more valuable.pdf: "Does This Emperor Wear Clothes