Original sentence: However, there is no extant copy of this alleged Aramaic original to support this theory.In fact, in the original Aramaic version Jesus never pronounced those sentences, that are misunderstanding translation of what Jesus said after miracles to underline the goodness of God.The conclusion of the philological study is that the messianic secret, more than a theology by the first Church or by Mark, is an invention of modern writers
Edited sentence: It should be noted that there is no extant copy of this alleged Aramaic original to support this theory.The conclusion of the philological study is that the messianic secret, more than a theology by the first Church or by Mark, is an invention of later translators of the Gospel.They proposed that in an original Aramaic version of the Gospel, Jesus never expressed those ideas, and that they were added as a result of mistranslation of what Jesus said after the miracles to underscore the goodness of God