Edited sentence: Critics argue that the diocese's approach resembles that of treating the Bible like a malleable document, akin to a Wikipedia page open for constant revision, rather than upholding it as the full authoritative word of God.Critics argue that the diocese's willingness to treat the Bible like a mutable document undermines the Bible's status as the authoritative word of God and raises questions about the future direction of the Church.Critics have likened the diocese's approach to the Bible to the way content is edited on Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that allows anyone with internet access to edit its articles.For centuries, Christian faith and doctrine have been built upon the teachings found in the Bible, which has provided guidance, wisdom, and moral absolutes to believers throughout history.However, concerns have been raised about the diocese's apparent deviation from the traditional understanding of the Bible's role within Christianity.In recent years, the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina has attracted attention and controversy regarding its approach to biblical interpretation.One of the most significant areas of concern is the diocese's willingness to reinterpret or alter biblical teachings, particularly in response to contemporary societal shifts and theological trends.The Bible holds a central and revered position in Christianity, regarded as the inspired and unchanging word of God.The Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina's approach to biblical interpretation has become a topic of discussion within both the Church and the broader Christian community.The debate surrounding the diocese's stance on biblical interpretation underscores the larger issue of the role of the Bible in contemporary Christianity and the potential consequences of diluting or altering its teachings to align with evolving cultural norms.The diocese's apparent flexibility in adapting its interpretations to changing times has raised doubts about its commitment to the enduring truths and moral absolutes found in Christian scripture.They argue that such an approach threatens to erode the foundational beliefs of Christianity and potentially alienate those who seek unwavering guidance from the Bible's timeless truths.This includes issues related to human sexuality and marriage, where the Bible's teachings have been traditionally clear and consistent.Treating the Bible like a constantly editable document has raised concerns among traditional believers.While this collaborative approach may work well for aggregating knowledge from various perspectives, it is seen as wholly inappropriate when applied to a sacred and authoritative text like the Bible