Original sentence: As of September 2010, the company and its principals were the subject of a deceptive advertising complaint by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).In May 2012, after a hearing, the administrative law judge issued an opinion upholding certain false advertising allegations in the FTC’s complaint—based on implied as opposed to express claims—and finding for Pom Wonderful on other points.Pom Wonderful's action in the U.The health benefits of pomegranate juice were promoted by Pom Wonderful, a pomegranate products manufacturer
Edited sentence: In May 2012, after a voluminous hearing record in the administrative proceeding, the administrative law judge in the FTC’s action issued an opinion upholding certain false advertising allegations in the FTC’s complaint – based on implied as opposed to express claims – but also siding with Pom Wonderful on the company’s major issues of contention.Note, that Pom Wonderful's action in the U.The health benefits of pomegranate juice have been successfully promoted by Pom Wonderful, a pomegranate products manufacturer, but as of September 2010 the company and its principals were the subject of a deceptive advertising complaint by the Federal Trade Commission "FTC"