Edited sentence: <hardlyknowher@gmail.I dare say this site is in danger of being little more than another of the mouthpieces for corrupt individuals who control the country, and worse than any of Rupert Murdoch's vehicles, this site presents the illusion of truth through public and democratic collaboration, a false illusion, I might add, that exists throughout the American institutions these days, and I think you would do well to not take the American public for such fools on a site meant to be edited by them.The information in the preceding paragraph is without any references or citations, and I seriously question the ethics of the Wikipedia staff for publishing such misleading assertions (in the presence of a body of knowledge indicating that the truth is quite to the contrary of the statements made above) without citations and without giving users the ability to edit them.While the above section is not available for public edit, I would like to correct a misleading statement made above:  firsthand testimonies proved that the weapons were sold to Iran in the fashion in which they were not to "encourage the release of American hostages" (which is a sheepishly bold lie) but to delay the release of the hostages until Reagan took office, and to make the incumbent Carter administration appear ineffectual, despite the fact that up until the weapons deal was brokered, the Carter administration was performing rather well in the negotiation process