Original sentence: Stephen Baskerville asserts that when child abuse occurs the perpetrator is not likely to be the father, and that the child abuse most often occurs after the father has been separated from his children
Edited sentence: Basically, Baskerville is a disgusting misogynist and should not be listened to.Certain fathers are abusers and will keep on being abusive to their ex and, in many cases, their child(ren).He is simply an abuse enabler.If this involves attempting to discredit a survivor of domestic abuse, they will do it.Often they are jealous and resent not being able to terrify and control.Stephen Baskerville asserts that when child abuse occurs the perpetrator is not likely to be the father[THIS IS A BLATANT LIE], and that the child abuse most often occurs after the father has been separated from his children[BECAUSE HE WANTS TO GET HIS OWN BACK AGAINST HIS EX].These so-called men claim to be victimized by their exes, but they are LIARS.They are selfish, sadistic and pathetic.They will do everything in their power to continue abusing.This is why they are opposed to any form of help for abuse victims and survivors.Usually when a claim of domestic abuse is brought forward as a reason for refusal of access to a child, it is perfectly legitimate