Edited sentence: AiG disagrees with evolution, but they sometimes have a very controversial interpretation of what evolution is.AiG do not merely present a non-naturalistic alternative to evolution- their interpretation of evolution is different from that understood by mainstream scientists working in the evolutionary field.Because AiG are adamant that evolution is wrong, it is important to understand whether they are attacking actual positions held by mainstream evolutionists.Their characterization of evolution is not one that would always be recognized by evolutionary scientists, or mainstream scientific journals and organizations.Though, this does not by itself automatically invalidate their statements, it is one factor that has caused mainstream scientists to reject the arguments of AiG and like-minded organizations