Original sentence: "  He also added that "One shouldn't read the book in the belief the statistics are accurate to 12 decimal places.Bryan Haig, who has characterized Maddison's figures for 19th century Australia as "inaccurate and irrelevant", by John Caldwell, in whose assessment Maddison's arguments have a "dangerous circularity", by W.Economist and Journalist Evan Davis has praised Maddison's research by citing it as a "fantastic publication" and that it was "based on the detailed scholarship of the world expert on historical economic data Angus Maddison.Maddison' assumptions have been criticized and admired by academics and journalists
Edited sentence: Maddison' assumptions have been criticized by academics: by Bryan Haig, who has characterized Maddison's figures for 19th century Australia as "inaccurate and irrelevant", by John Caldwell, in whose assessment Maddison's arguments have a "dangerous circularity", by W