Original sentence: Although never conceived for the rough-and-tumble of carrier-deck operations, the Spitfire was considered to be the best candidate available at the time and went on to serve with distinction.Early marks of Seafire had relatively few modifications, however late marks were heavily-adapted.One was poor visibility over the nose; and like the Spitfire, the Seafire had a relatively narrow undercarriage track which meant that it was not ideally suited to deck operations.The Seafire II was able to outperform the A6M5 (Zero) at low altitudes when the two types were tested against each other during wartime mock combat exercises.The Seafire was a naval version of the Spitfire specially adapted for operation from aircraft carriers
Edited sentence: A naval version of the Supermarine Spitfire, called the Seafire, was specially adapted for operation from aircraft carriers.Although never conceived for the rough-and tumble of carrier-deck operations, the Spitfire was considered to be the best candidate available at the time and went on to serve with distinction.Early marks of Seafire had relatively few modifications, however late marks of Seafire were heavily-adapted and highly potent machines.Like the Spitfire, the Seafire had a relatively narrow undercarriage track, which meant that it was not ideally suited to deck operations.One was poor visibility over the nose.The Seafire II was able to outperform the A6M5 (Zero) at low altitudes when the two types were tested against each other during wartime mock combats