Edited sentence: "  The problem with this criticism is the fact that "good poker players are always enduring outdraws because of the nature of poker itself." This might in effect be true on any given session of play, but to justify the numerous outdraws and bad beats endured by players is simply not logical.According to one critic, the number of outdraws "good" players endure on the network is "incomprehensible.Another alleged drawback is the possibility that the network employs "house" players with the intention of claiming a portion of the prize pool, or to keep action going in cash games.But there is a pattern to be noticed while playing on the network.Collusion is also a natural result of online poker; how much Prima and other sites are doing to combat cheats and protect players is debatable.If one still cannot fathom that this site is guilty of foul play driven by the sheer motivation of profit, then one should ask himself how many times in their poker career playing days have they seen quads(four of kind) 10 times in one week.In general tournaments that have a guaranteed prize pool have amazingly huge number pots in the begining due to all the great hands people are holding.Instead, there are less number of huge pots because there are less monster hands dealt.It is alleged that Prima poker does have its drawbacks.Many advocates of online poker argue that a player sees 3 times as many hands online as in live poker, hence he should 3 times as many bad beats.Nevertheless, thousands of players every day continue to trust millions of dollars to poker rooms like Prima in order to get in on the action.So, the consensus here is that Prima poker can't be fixed.The big quesiton here is not whether bad beats occur but at the rate at which they occur.These allegations have lead some to question the integrity of the site, a common situation for online poker rooms.This argument seems to be more logical.This is not the case with tournaments that do not have guaranteed prize pools.This latter allegation is sometimes also leveled against "brick-and-mortar" casinos, since the house takes a larger rake from the more active games