Original sentence: " can be answered with theological arguments, this appears to create a logical paradox whics is fatal to the ID argument unless an uncaused causer, that is to say, God, is invoked, in which case ID reduces to religious creationism.", since a designer capable of creating irrducible complexity must also, by ID's own arguments, be irreducibly complex.As with religious creationism.ID is open to the criticism "what designed the designer.Once this is done, ID ceases to be a falsifiable theory, and therefore loses its ability claim to be a scientific theory.Unlike with religious creationism, where the question "what created God