Original sentence: In evaluating the Dragon Skin system, it is important to note that while the external measurements of the Dragon Skin panel are 11.5” x 13.5”, the area of level III coverage provided by the encased ceramic discs is 10” x 12”; the fabric edges are not intended to provide ballistic protection.In response to these claims, Pinnacle Armor released a press release as an official response to Karl Master's comments, saying the testing was biased, not conducted professionally, that the testing is still unfinished, and the vests did not fail.Individual users include the U.Pinnacle SOV-2000 "Dragon Skin" is a kind of body armor made by Pinnacle Armor and worn by personnel expected to be in high-threat situations.The Dragon Skin became the subject controversy with the U
Edited sentence: "Dragon Skin" is a kind of body armor made by Pinnacle Armor and worn by the U.AMI level III 12” x 14.5” plates weigh about 10 lbs and 10” x 12” plates are about 9 lbs.AMI level III plates are fabricated using an outer 3 mm MARS steel layer bonded to a compressed Dyneema backing, with a linex coating for spall reduction, resulting in a total plate thickness of approximately 1”.In evaluating the Dragon Skin system, it is important to note that while the external measurements of the Dragon Skin panel are 11.5” x 13.5”, the area of level III coverage provided by the encased ceramic discs is 10” x 12”; the fabric edges are NOT intended to provide ballistic protection.It's been the subject of testing controversy with the U.Pinnacle Armor then released another press release as an official response to Karl Master's comments saying the testing was biased, not conducted professionally, said the testing is still unfinished, and the vests did not fail.This data refutes the claims by certain members of the army that the Dragon Skin body armor cannot handle high heat conditioning, angle of obliquity impacts or substantial multiple repeat hits