Edited sentence: "Agape denotes the ardent use of one's reasoning and knowledge to intelligently comprehensively 'understand' for a corresponding higher intelligent spiritual purpose and action" <7>  Also misleading and misunderstood is agape at     ICor.12:29-31.13:4-7.29 where Mark appropriates Deut.30, 31 (Deut.3:16.5:44 where if we tried to embrace our enemy, we could quickly end up with a black eye; whereas if we could 'understand' all their anger and hate with a spiritual higher purpose to free them of this and rescue him from his sin thus allow the "inspired Word" (as formerly defined) save his eternal soul from the lake of fire.6:4.6:5), agape (as formerly defined) towards God and our neighbor way beyond worshiping in Church on Sunday for a couple of hours as the English conveys.<7> [Least of the Greatest Scholars:  Jack W.Agape always has been the object 'understood' and not the object 'loved' with the English shades of Altruistic, philanthropic, and definitely not with mankind's devotion to and desire for God on Sunday for a couple of hours.Agape, the object 'understood' harmonizes with Matt.Atkins j-atkins.Finally, let us look at Mk.God could not embrace a world full of sin, but He did 'understand' with a corresponding higher spiritual divine purpose to cleanse those that are His bringing them into His kingdom.God's agape with purpose sums up the entire gospel (and law).Look at Jn.Note introduction in v.Note vs.The Name of the Lord is the sum and substance of the gospel where Moses puts the gospel first supplying the supreme drive for keeping the greatest Commandment in the New Testament.This is agape personified so that we can compare ourselves to the enclosed contents.Todays modern definition of the inspired Word's agape is a prime example of why we must translate and interpret the "inspired Word" (Defined as the original inspired autographs) over from the Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek FORWARD to the English - not backwards, from the English back to the ancient languages ending with spurious diverse interpretations where each appears as the genuine interpretation.[Secondary source: j-atkins