Original sentence: " In actuality, it was the German Waffen-SS troops that massacred eighty-four surrendering American soldiers." Media Matters for America showed that Fox News later edited the transcripts of the conversation, inserting the word "Normandy" where O'Reilly had said "Malmedy." O'Reilly was denounced by MSNBC talk show host Keith Olbermann."It was in the wake of the Malmedy incident at Chegnogne [sic] that on New Year's Day 1945 some 60 German POWs were shot in cold blood by their American guards.In a later broadcast, O'Reilly responded to a viewer's attempt to correct his previous night's claim, stating "In the heat of the debate with General Clark my statement wasn't clear enough…after Malmedy some German captives were executed by American troops".In his book "The Other Price of Hitler's War: German Military & Civilian Losses Resulting from WW 2," author Martin Sorge wrote about the events that took place after the massacre:.In this column O'Reilly then used the example that the US Army's 11th Armored Division allegedly responded to the Malmedy massacre in the aftermath by carrying out revenge attacks on captured German soldiers.O'Reilly posted a column almost a year earlier on June 23, 2005 on his website, where he correctly described the Waffen-SS troops as the ones who massacred the surrendering US Army soldiers near Malmedy, and not the other way around.O'Reilly stated "General, you need to look at the Malmedy massacre in World War Two, and the 82nd Airborne who did it.O'Reilly stated "In Malmedy, as you know, US Forces captured SS forces who had their hands in the air and they were unarmed and they shot them down.On May 30, 2006 O'Reilly again interviewed Wesley Clark.On October 28 2005, O'Reilly incorrectly claimed, in an interview with Fox News Channel analyst General Wesley Clark, that U.That's on the record and documented.The guilt went unpunished.You know that.troops committed the Malmedy massacre