Original sentence: In 1972, Steinway punished Garrick Ohlsson for his statement that Bösendorfer was "the Rolls-Royce of pianos", by trucking away the concert grand Ohlsson was about to play in a recital at Alice Tully Hall in New York City.Numerous other pianists have voiced similar complaints.Ohlsson ended up performing on a Bösendorfer borrowed at the 11th hour, but Steinway barred him from using its instruments for some time.Steinway artists are expected to perform exclusively on Steinway instruments at all times.The Steinway Artist Program has not been without controversy.The company has been known to impose penalties on performers who deviate from this program
Edited sentence: ) According to fact there is no possible way (except by the use of bribe) that any piano company could establish a "monopoly on the concert world" because it is the pianist or the concert hall which selects Steinway pianos for their performances.In 1972, Steinway responded to Garrick Ohlsson's statement that Bösendorfer was "the Rolls-Royce of pianos", by retreiving the concert grand Ohlsson was about to play in a recital at Alice Tully Hall in New York City.No organization is given to bribing or pressuring (in any way) an artist to be a Steinway artist, yet the majority of legitimate concert pianists (those which have a degree in music) wish to be Steinway artists.Ohlsson ended up performing on a Bösendorfer borrowed at the 11th hour, but Steinway refused to deliver pianos from their own concert piano bank for some time.Steinway artists expect to perform exclusively on Steinway instruments at all times.The company has been known to impose retribution on performers who deviate from this program.” This is of course, a rumor (by the definition of the word