Original sentence: ", and a panel headed by Qaradawi replied: "To be absolved from guilt, the raped woman must have shown some sort of good conduct... Islam addresses women to maintain their modesty, as not to open the door for evil... The Koran calls upon Muslim women in general to preserve their dignity and modesty, just to save themselves from any harassment... So for a rape victim to be absolved from guilt, she must not be the one that opens... her dignity for deflowering".In 2004 The Daily Telegraph reported that IslamOnline was asked the following question "Are raped women punished in Islam.IslamOnline denied that al-Qaradawi wrote the answer, and claimed that they clearly stated raped women were not punished.The report by the Sunday Telegraph was challenged by the Muslim Association of Britain, who believed the article falsely attributed the comments to al-Qaradawi and was part of a "right-wing media" attempt to "stoke up the flames of hate" against al-Qaradawi.They demanded that the Telegraph issue a full apology as well as the resignation of the two writers of the article
Edited sentence: " Badr added that "the only time Qaradawi was mentioned inside the page was to cite his encouragement of support for rape victims." The Muslim Association of Britain, which threatened to take legal action against the Telegraph, demanded that the paper publish a full apology and dismiss the two authors of the article.In 2004 The Daily Telegraph reported that panel headed by Qaradawi stated in an edict posted on IslamOnline.Kamal Badr, who was the author of the edict, argued that the Telegraph's article involved statements that were "taken out of context" and claimed "This is [a] falsification of the truth, nothing more nothing less.Officials from IslamOnline.net subsequently denied that Qaradawi has anything to do with the edict.net that a rape victim must resist her attackers to be absolved of from guilt