Edited sentence: His economic's philosophy is to follow the King's economic's philosophy, Sufficiency Economy.In this way, the peticide and the fertilizer chemist is not necessary because the plants and livestocks are not affected by the same germ or virus at the same time, there are always many products lefts to them.It gets along with modern world well.It may be not steep, rocket-flying profit, but it's not deep down loss too, The steady and safe pace in developing the industrial sector will win in the long run.So, this way, they don't depend on just one kind of plant ( spread the risk equally to many plants and livestock ) and they serve their needs enough before they sell the extra products to the community.Some may misunderstanding this as drawback to aricultureal, but it is not.Thailand has farmers and vegetable raisers more than 70% of the population.The Enough Economy can adapt to industrial sector well too, If the industrial sector is mainly not look for fast track way ( risk, gambling for profit ) but instead look for strong business foundation that relate to real work, social responsibility, natures, and sustainable profit.The Enough Economy's primary goal is to produce for their needs first, so they should do many things such as plant rice, fruit, and livestock instead in the same area that they used to produce just one crop.The goal of their career is to produce for the rest of the country.The problem is they raise one kind of crops to sell and loan money for pesticide and fertilizer chemist and they can't pay back because the price of aricultural is low.The root of this philosophy is a kind of sustainable economy.They get along well.You can relate this philosophy to Bhutan's Gross Domestic Hapiness Index