Original sentence: However, these arguments ignore the multitude of ways in which Ipuwer differs from Exodus, such as that it describes the Asiatics as arriving in Egypt rather than leaving, and that the "river is blood" phrase may refer to the red sediment colouring the Nile during disastrous floods, or simply be a poetic image of turmoil.Ipuwer has often been put forward in popular literature as confirmation of the biblical account of the Exodus, most notably because of its statement that "the river is blood" and its frequent references to servants running away
Edited sentence: However, Secularists, wishing to deny the seeming historical verification of events of the Bible would defend themselves that these arguments differ in several ways from Exodus, such as that it describes the Asiatics as arriving in Egypt rather than leaving, and that the "river is blood" phrase may refer to the red sediment colouring the Nile during disastrous floods, or simply be a poetic image of turmoil, again, for those wishing to deny the apparent corroberation.Ipuwer has often been put forward in popular literature as confirmation of the biblical account of the Exodus, most notably because of its statement that "the river is blood" and its frequent references to servants running away, and several of the other biblical plagues