feyninc/tacha huggingface dataset:
BCE’s operating lease commitments at December 31, 2018 were $1,612 million. The difference between operating lease commitments at December 31, 2018 and lease liabilities of $2,304 million upon adoption of IFRS 16 at January 1, 2019, is due mainly to an increase of $1,122 million related to renewal options reasonably certain to be exercised, an increase of $112 million mainly related to non-monetary transactions and a decrease of ($542) million as a result of discounting applied to future lease payments, which was determined using a weighted average incremental borrowing rate of 3.49% at January 1, 2019.

Question: What was recognized upon adoption of IFRS 16 in 2019?
Answer: right-of-use assets, lease liabilities
## Table

|  | DECEMBER 31, 2018 AS REPORTED | IFRS 16 IMPACTS | JANUARY 1, 2019 UPON ADOPTION OF IFRS 16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prepaid expenses | 244 | (55) | 189 |
| Other current assets | 329 | 9 | 338 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 24,844 | 2,257 | 27,101 |
| Other non-current assets | 847 | 17 | 864 |
| Trade payables and other liabilities | 3,941 | (10) | 3,931 |
| Debt due within one year | 4,645 | 293 | 4,938 |
| Long-term debt | 19,760 | 2,011 | 21,771 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 3,163 | (7) | 3,156 |
| Other non-current liabilities | 997 | (39) | 958 |
| Deficit | (4,937) | (19) | (4,956) |
| Non-controlling interest | 326 | (1) | 325 |

Question: How many components had a positive value of IFRS 16 Impacts?
Answer: 5
BCE’s operating lease commitments at December 31, 2018 were $1,612 million. The difference between operating lease commitments at December 31, 2018 and lease liabilities of $2,304 million upon adoption of IFRS 16 at January 1, 2019, is due mainly to an increase of $1,122 million related to renewal options reasonably certain to be exercised, an increase of $112 million mainly related to non-monetary transactions and a decrease of ($542) million as a result of discounting applied to future lease payments, which was determined using a weighted average incremental borrowing rate of 3.49% at January 1, 2019.

Question: What is the difference between the right-of-use assets recognized within property, plant and equipment and the lease liabilities recognized within debt upon adoption of IFRS 16?
Answer: 47
|  | DECEMBER 31, 2018 AS REPORTED | IFRS 16 IMPACTS | JANUARY 1, 2019 UPON ADOPTION OF IFRS 16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prepaid expenses | 244 | (55) | 189 |
| Other current assets | 329 | 9 | 338 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 24,844 | 2,257 | 27,101 |
| Other non-current assets | 847 | 17 | 864 |

Question: What is the percentage change in property, plant and equipment upon adoption of IFRS 16?
Answer: 9.08
In 2017, we repurchased or redeemed $1.55 billion of principal amount of notes (carrying value of $1.54 billion) for an aggregate of $1.63 billion in cash. In connection with these transactions, we recognized aggregate non-operating losses of $94 million in 2017.

Question: How much principal amount of notes did the company repurchased or redeemed in 2018?
Answer: $6.96 billion
## Table

|  | Increase (Decrease) in Principal | Increase (Decrease) in Carrying Value | Increase (Decrease) in Cash | Decrease in Equity | Gain (Loss) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issuances |  |  |  |  |  |
| 2024 Notes(1) | $600 | $597 | $597 | $— | $— |
| 2026 Notes(1) | 500 | 497 | 497 | — | — |
| 2027 Notes(2) | 900 | 895 | 895 | — | — |

Question: What was the difference in its carrying value of the issuance of 2027 Notes?
Answer: 895
## Table

|  | Increase (Decrease) in Principal | Increase (Decrease) in Carrying Value | Increase (Decrease) in Cash | Decrease in Equity | Gain (Loss) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issuances |  |  |  |  |  |
| 2024 Notes(1) | $600 | $597 | $597 | $— | $— |
| 2026 Notes(1) | 500 | 497 | 497 | — | — |
| 2027 Notes(2) | 900 | 895 | 895 | — | — |
| 2029 Notes(1) | 700 | 695 | 695 | — | — |
| 2030 Notes(2) | 850 | 845 | 845 | — | — |
| Prepayments |  |  |  |  |  |
| 2022 Term Loan B | (728) | (721) | (728) | — | (7) |
| Settled conversions |  |  |  |  |  |
| 2032D Notes | (10) | (9) | (35) | (28) | 2 |
| 2033F Notes | (45) | (175) | (192) | (28) | 11 |

Question: What was the decrease in equity of settled conversions in 2032D Notes?
Answer: (28)
|  | Increase (Decrease) in Principal | Increase (Decrease) in Carrying Value | Increase (Decrease) in Cash | Decrease in Equity | Gain (Loss) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issuances |  |  |  |  |  |
| 2024 Notes(1) | $600 | $597 | $597 | $— | $— |
| 2026 Notes(1) | 500 | 497 | 497 | — | — |
| 2027 Notes(2) | 900 | 895 | 895 | — | — |

Question: What was the total value of the changes in principal on the issuance of 2024 Notes, 2026 Notes, 2027 Notes, 2029 Notes, and 2030 Notes?
Answer: 3550

Question: What is the ratio of the increase in carrying value of 2029 Notes to 2030 Notes?
Answer: 0.82

Question: What is the difference of increase in cash between 2024 Notes and 2026 Notes?
Answer: 100
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

Question: What were the weighted-average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively?
Answer: $6.75, $10.42, $12.07
## Table

|  | Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 1,160,419 | $29.93 | $14,299 |  |
| Granted | 534,030 | $42.90 |  |  |
| Exercised | (463,800) | $29.34 | $7,203 |  |
| Cancelled and expired | (61,241) | $33.80 |  |  |
| Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017 | 1,169,408 | $35.88 | $16,731 |  |

Question: What was the number of stock options that were outstanding at December 31, 2017?
Answer: 1,169,408
## Table

|  | Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 1,160,419 | $29.93 | $14,299 |  |
| Granted | 534,030 | $42.90 |  |  |
| Exercised | (463,800) | $29.34 | $7,203 |  |
| Cancelled and expired | (61,241) | $33.80 |  |  |
| Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017 | 1,169,408 | $35.88 | $16,731 |  |
| Granted | 466,828 | $54.87 |  |  |
| Exercised | (420,524) | $30.05 | $12,411 |  |
| Cancelled and expired | (122,312) | $43.85 |  |  |
| Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018 | 1,093,400 | $45.34 | $8,776 |  |
| Granted | 489,947 | $63.87 |  |  |
| Exercised | (338,748) | $37.94 | $9,641 |  |
| Cancelled and expired | (108,504) | $51.21 |  |  |
| Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2019 | 1,136,095 | $54.98 | $28,291 | 4 years |

Question: What was the weighted average remaining contractual life of the stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2019?
Answer: 4 years
|  | Number of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 1,160,419 | $29.93 | $14,299 |  |
| Granted | 534,030 | $42.90 |  |  |
| Exercised | (463,800) | $29.34 | $7,203 |  |
| Cancelled and expired | (61,241) | $33.80 |  |  |

Question: What is the total value of stock options outstanding on December 31, 2018?
Answer: 49574756

Question: What is the total price of stock options exercised or canceled and expired during the period between December 31, 2018, and 2019?
Answer: 18408588.96

Question: What is the ratio of stock options exercisable to outstanding on December 31, 2019?
Answer: 0.26
## Table

|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation:       |  |  |  |
| AMER  | $22,531 | $21,224 | $19,694 |

Question: What was the depreciation from AMER in 2017?
Answer: 19,694
## Table

|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation:       |  |  |  |
| AMER  | $22,531 | $21,224 | $19,694 |
| APAC  | 16,905 | 15,954 | 15,588 |

Question: What was the depreciation from APAC in 2018?
Answer: 15,954
## Table

|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation:       |  |  |  |
| AMER  | $22,531 | $21,224 | $19,694 |
| APAC  | 16,905 | 15,954 | 15,588 |
| EMEA  | 6,105 | 6,054 | 5,467 |
| Corporate  | 5,344 | 4,863 | 4,581 |

Question: What was the Corporate depreciation in 2019?
Answer: 5,344
## Table

|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation:       |  |  |  |
| AMER  | $22,531 | $21,224 | $19,694 |
| APAC  | 16,905 | 15,954 | 15,588 |
| EMEA  | 6,105 | 6,054 | 5,467 |
| Corporate  | 5,344 | 4,863 | 4,581 |
|  | 50,885 | 48,095 | 45,330 |
| Capital expenditures: |  |  |  |
| AMER | $42,459 | $17,690 | $18,111 |
| APAC | 33,454 | 33,018 | 13,816 |
| EMEA | 5,186 | 7,923 | 5,748 |
| Corporate | 9,501 | 4,149 | 863 |
|  | $90,600 | $62,780 | $38,538 |

Question: How many years did depreciation from APAC exceed $15,000 thousand instead?
Answer: 3
|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation:       |  |  |  |
| AMER  | $22,531 | $21,224 | $19,694 |
| APAC  | 16,905 | 15,954 | 15,588 |
| EMEA  | 6,105 | 6,054 | 5,467 |

Question: What was the change in Corporate Depreciation between 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 481

Question: What was the percentage change in the total depreciation between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 6.1
|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current: |  |  |  |
| Federal  | $15,160 | $63,814 | $78 |
| State  | — | 234 | 33 |
| Foreign  | 11,943 | 10,134 | 10,016 |

Question: Which years does the table provide information for the Income tax expense (benefit)?
Answer: 2019, 2018, 2017
## Table

|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current: |  |  |  |
| Federal  | $15,160 | $63,814 | $78 |

Question: What was the current federal income tax expense  in 2017?
Answer: 78
## Table

|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current: |  |  |  |
| Federal  | $15,160 | $63,814 | $78 |
| State  | — | 234 | 33 |
| Foreign  | 11,943 | 10,134 | 10,016 |
|  | 27,103 | 74,182 | 10,127 |
| Deferred: |  |  |  |
| Federal  | (3,498) | (2,958) | 77 |

Question: What was the deferred federal income tax expense  in 2018?
Answer: (2,958)
## Table

|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current: |  |  |  |
| Federal  | $15,160 | $63,814 | $78 |
| State  | — | 234 | 33 |
| Foreign  | 11,943 | 10,134 | 10,016 |
|  | 27,103 | 74,182 | 10,127 |
| Deferred: |  |  |  |
| Federal  | (3,498) | (2,958) | 77 |
| State  | 827 | (447) | 38 |
| Foreign  | (7,093) | 23,793 | (481) |
|  | (9,764) | 20,388 | (366) |
|  | $17,339 | $94,570 | $9,761 |

Question: How many years did the total income tax expense exceed $50,000 thousand?
Answer: 1
|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current: |  |  |  |
| Federal  | $15,160 | $63,814 | $78 |
| State  | — | 234 | 33 |
| Foreign  | 11,943 | 10,134 | 10,016 |

Question: What was the change in the total current income tax expense between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 64055

Question: What was the percentage change in the deferred State income tax expense between 2017 and 2019?
Answer: 2076.32
Assets recognised from costs to obtain a contract relate to capitalised incremental costs to obtain a contract, being sales commissions arising on contracts with customers of more than one year in length. No assets were impaired or derecognised during the current year or prior year.

Question: Why does the Company have no significant concentration of credit risk attributable to its trade debtors?
Answer: as the exposure is spread over a large number of customers.
capitalised incremental costs to obtain a contract, being sales commissions arising on contracts with customers of more than one year in length

Question: What do the assets recognised from costs to obtain a contract relate to?
Answer: capitalised incremental costs to obtain a contract, being sales commissions arising on contracts with customers of more than one year in length
## Table

|  |  | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
|  | Notes | £ million | £ million |
| Due within one year |  |  |  |
| Trade debtors |  | 5.2 | 7.0 |
| Owed by subsidiaries |  | 13.7 | 9.6 |
| Other debtors |  | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| Prepayments |  | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Current tax asset |  | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Deferred tax | 13 | – | 1.3 |
| Assets recognised from costs to obtain a contract |  | 0.1 | 0.1 |

Question: What are the components under Due within one year?
Answer: Trade debtors, Owed by subsidiaries, Other debtors, Prepayments, Current tax asset, Deferred tax, Assets recognised from costs to obtain a contract
|  |  | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
|  | Notes | £ million | £ million |
| Due within one year |  |  |  |
| Trade debtors |  | 5.2 | 7.0 |
| Owed by subsidiaries |  | 13.7 | 9.6 |

Question: In which year was the amount due within one year larger?
Answer: 2019

Question: What was the change in the amount owed by subsidiaries?
Answer: 4.1

Question: What was the percentage change in the amount owed by subsidiaries?
Answer: 42.71
We completed the accounting for the Tax Act during Q3 fiscal 2019 and recorded an adjustment on December 31, 2018 of $0.2 million to increase our deferred tax liability associated with certain indefinite lived intangibles. We have elected to account for global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) inclusions in the period in which they are incurred.

Question: What was the provisional tax benefit in 2018?
Answer: approximately $3.3 million
Our tax provision includes a provision for income taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions where subsidiaries are profitable, but only a minimal benefit is reflected related to U.S. and certain foreign tax losses due to the uncertainty of the ultimate realization of future benefits from these losses.

Question: What was the adjustment against the tax act in Q3 2019?
Answer: $0.2 million
| (In thousands) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income tax benefit at the US Federal statutory rate | $(2,718) | $(3,654) | $(4,019) |
| Benefit for state taxes | (304) | (642) | (142) |
| Impact of foreign operations | (310) | 38 | 158 |
| Indefinite life assets | 130 | 335 | 102 |

Question: What are the years included in the table?
Answer: 2019, 2018, 2017

Question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the benefit for state taxes from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 338

Question: What was the average indefinite life assets for 2017-2019?
Answer: 189

Question: What was the average Change in valuation allowance for 2017-2019?
Answer: 3545.67
| Selling, General and Administrative Costs (in thousands) |  |  |  |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description | Twelve months ended October 31, 2019 | Twelve months ended October 31, 2018 | Increase/(Decrease)  |
| Advertising expense | $11,071 | $32,624 | $ (21,553) |
| Trainee expense  | 16,254 | 21,553 | (5,299) |
| Start-up expense (Tyler, Texas complex)  | 9,361 | 13,394 | (4,033) |

Question: Why was there a decrease in advertising expense?
Answer: result of the Company's decision to scale back its television and radio advertising during fiscal 2019.
## Table

| Selling, General and Administrative Costs (in thousands) |  |  |  |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description | Twelve months ended October 31, 2019 | Twelve months ended October 31, 2018 | Increase/(Decrease)  |
| Advertising expense | $11,071 | $32,624 | $ (21,553) |
| Trainee expense  | 16,254 | 21,553 | (5,299) |
| Start-up expense (Tyler, Texas complex)  | 9,361 | 13,394 | (4,033) |
| Stock compensation expense  | 11,786 | 15,702 | (3,916) |
| All other SG&A expenses  | 62,653 | 64,705 | (2,052) |
| Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense  | 3,000 | 2,000 | 1,000 |
| Depreciation expense - machinery and equipment  | 7,067 | 5,801 | 1,266 |
| Sanderson Farms Championship expense  | 8,817 | 6,325 | 2,492 |
| Administrative salaries | 45,108 | 42,288 | 2,820 |
| Legal expense  | 25,102 | 17,573 | 7,529 |
| Third-party sales commissions  | 10,922 | — | 10,922 |
| Total SG&A  | $211,141 | $221,965 | $ (10,824) |

Question: What was the total SG&A for fiscal 2019 and 2018 respectively?
Answer: $211,141, $221,965
## Table

| Selling, General and Administrative Costs (in thousands) |  |  |  |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description | Twelve months ended October 31, 2019 | Twelve months ended October 31, 2018 | Increase/(Decrease)  |
| Advertising expense | $11,071 | $32,624 | $ (21,553) |
| Trainee expense  | 16,254 | 21,553 | (5,299) |
| Start-up expense (Tyler, Texas complex)  | 9,361 | 13,394 | (4,033) |
| Stock compensation expense  | 11,786 | 15,702 | (3,916) |
| All other SG&A expenses  | 62,653 | 64,705 | (2,052) |
| Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense  | 3,000 | 2,000 | 1,000 |
| Depreciation expense - machinery and equipment  | 7,067 | 5,801 | 1,266 |
| Sanderson Farms Championship expense  | 8,817 | 6,325 | 2,492 |
| Administrative salaries | 45,108 | 42,288 | 2,820 |
| Legal expense  | 25,102 | 17,573 | 7,529 |

Question: What was the legal expense for fiscal 2019 and 2018 respectively?
Answer: 25,102, 17,573
| Selling, General and Administrative Costs (in thousands) |  |  |  |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description | Twelve months ended October 31, 2019 | Twelve months ended October 31, 2018 | Increase/(Decrease)  |
| Advertising expense | $11,071 | $32,624 | $ (21,553) |
| Trainee expense  | 16,254 | 21,553 | (5,299) |
| Start-up expense (Tyler, Texas complex)  | 9,361 | 13,394 | (4,033) |

Question: What is the average legal expense for fiscal 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 21337.5

Question: What is the average Administrative salaries for fiscal 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 43698

Question: What is the average Advertising expense for fiscal 2019 and 2018?
Answer: 21847.5
(1) As of December 31, 2018, there were 1,478 restricted stock shares issued for new awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan and (5,024) restricted stock shares forfeited that were not yet reflected by our Recordkeeper. The table above (shares available under the Omnibus Incentive Plan) reflects this activity as occurred, creating a reconciling difference between shares issued and number of shares available under the Omnibus Plan.

Question: What does the table represent?
Answer: summary of the changes in common shares available for awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan and Predecessor Plans
(2) Director units granted and deferred include the impact of share-settled dividends earned and deferred on deferred shares.

Question: How many restricted stock shares were issued for new awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2018?
Answer: 1,478
(4) The above table excludes approximately1.2 million contingently issuable shares under the PSU awards and SLO awards, which represents the maximum number of shares that could be issued under those plans as of December 31, 2019.

Question: What does the Omnibus Incentive Plan and 2005 Contingent Stock Plan permit?
Answer: withholding of taxes and other charges that may be required by law to be paid attributable to awards by withholding a portion of the shares attributable to such awards
|  | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares available, beginning of year | 4,489,347 | 3,668,954 | 5,385,870 |
| Newly Registered Shares under Omnibus Incentive Plan | — | 2,199,114 | — |
| Restricted stock shares issued for new awards(1) | — | (571,438 ) | (480,283) |
| Restricted stock shares forfeited(1) | 105,960 | 91,542 | 184,235 |

Question: What is the percentage difference of shares withheld for taxes for 2018 to 2019?
Answer: 163.54

Question: What is the Number of shares available, end of year expressed as a percentage of Number of shares available, beginning of year for 2019? 
Answer: 90.18

Question: What is the average annual Number of shares available, end of year for 2017-2019?
Answer: 4068936.67
Consumer security products include Norton security, Norton Secure VPN, and other consumer security solutions. Identity and information protection products include LifeLock identity theft protection and other information protection solutions.

Question: What do Endpoint and information protection products include?
Answer: endpoint security, advanced threat protection, and information protection solutions and their related support services
Products and service revenue information

Question: What does Consumer security products include?
Answer: Norton security, Norton Secure VPN, and other consumer security solutions
## Table

|  |  | Year Ended |  |
|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | March 29, 2019 | March 30, 2018 | March 31, 2017 |
| Enterprise Security: |  |  |  |
| Endpoint and information protection | $1,027 | $983 | $947 |
| Network and web security | 748 | 782 | 451 |
| WSS and PKI | - | 238 | 422 |
| Other products and services | 548 | 551 | 535 |
| Total Enterprise Security | $2,323 | $2,554 | $2,355 |
| Consumer Cyber Safety: |  |  |  |
| Consumer security | $1,471 | $1,504 | $1,527 |
| Identity and information protection | 937 | 776 | 137 |
| Total Consumer Cyber Safety | 2,408 | 2,280 | 1,664 |
| Total net revenues | $4,731 | $4,834 | $4,019 |

Question: What is the Total net revenues for year ended march 29, 2019?
Answer: $4,731
|  |  | Year Ended |  |
|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | March 29, 2019 | March 30, 2018 | March 31, 2017 |
| Enterprise Security: |  |  |  |
| Endpoint and information protection | $1,027 | $983 | $947 |
| Network and web security | 748 | 782 | 451 |

Question: For year ended march 29, 2019, what is Total Enterprise Security expressed as a percentage of Total net revenues?
Answer: 49.1

Question: What is the average Total net revenues for the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 4528

Question: For year ended march 29, 2019, what is the difference between  Total Consumer Cyber Safety and Total Enterprise Security?
Answer: 85
Management uses to measure the overall development of the assets and liabilities per share.

Question: What does TORM believe that the NAV/share is a relevant measure for?
Answer: Management uses to measure the overall development of the assets and liabilities per share.
using broker values of vessels and excluding charter commitments

Question: How is NAV/share calculated?
Answer: using broker values of vessels and excluding charter commitments
## Table

| USDm | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Asset Value per share |  |  |  |
| Total vessel values including newbuildings (broker values) | 1,801.5 | 1,675.1 | 1,661.1 |
| Committed CAPEX on newbuildings | -51.2 | -258.0 | -306.9 |
| Cash position | 72.5 | 127.4 | 134.2 |

Question: For which years is the Total Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share) calculated?
Answer: 2019, 2018, 2017
| USDm | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Asset Value per share |  |  |  |
| Total vessel values including newbuildings (broker values) | 1,801.5 | 1,675.1 | 1,661.1 |
| Committed CAPEX on newbuildings | -51.2 | -258.0 | -306.9 |
| Cash position | 72.5 | 127.4 | 134.2 |

Question: In which year was the Total Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share) the largest?
Answer: 2019

Question: What was the change in the Total Net Asset Value (NAV) in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 159.9

Question: What was the percentage change in the Total Net Asset Value (NAV) in 2019 from 2018?
Answer: 18.68
## Table

|  | Balance as of August 31, 2018 | Adjustments due to adoption of ASU 2014-09 | Balance as of September 1, 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets |  |  |  |
| Contract assets(1) | $— | $591,616 | $591,616 |

Question: What were the Adjustments due to adoption of ASU 2014-09 for contract assets?
Answer: $591,616