feyninc/hocr huggingface dataset:
Source: healthcare

Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies (VEBIS) of COVID-19 and Influenza – Tender Specifications ECDC/2021/12924

<table>
  <tr>
    <th>DL 1.7.3. Final report on the additional study</th>
    <td>Final report on one the additional study. Format to be agreed during monthly teleconferences. Cumulative data presented since the beginning of data collection.<br><br>The report will include: a summary, aim, general background, objectives, methods, description of data analysis, summary of findings, discussion, conclusion, recommendations on future studies, references, annexes.</td>
    <td>6 units, foreseen in year 2, 3 and 4</td>
    <td>Word - ECDC template</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th>DL 1.7.4. Final clean and validated dataset (pooled and by site) of the additional studies</th>
    <td>Individual validated data results with all collected variables, pooled and by site.<br><br>Deliverable includes datasets and scripts used to create the analysis of the final report</td>
    <td>Six units each foreseen in year 2, 3 and 4</td>
    <td>Excel, csv, other statistical software</td>
  </tr>
</table>

Consultancy Services

In addition to the above deliverables, the contractor could be asked to provide ECDC with expertise in the competence areas of surveillance, vaccine effectiveness, impact including statistical, or any other expertise viewed helpful to ECDC. These profiles would be requested on an ad hoc and/or as needed basis and would be short-term support.

<table>
  <tr>
    <th>Profile</th>
    <th>Description</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Expert</td>
    <td>A level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least three years attested by a diploma in a relevant field (eg. post-graduate or medical degree in epidemiology, microbiology, public health, medicine, veterinary medicine, biology or equivalent); At least 5 years professional experience in epidemiology of infectious diseases (following the award of the diploma)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Principal/ Senior Expert</td>
    <td>A level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least five years attested by a diploma in a relevant field (eg. post-graduate or medical degree in epidemiology, microbiology, public health, medicine, veterinary medicine, biology or equivalent); At least 8 years professional experience (following the award of the diploma)</td>
  </tr>
</table>
Source: math

where

\[
\Phi_c = \{ (\varphi, \psi) : \varphi(y_0) + \psi(y_1) \leq 1 \{ y_1 - y_0 < \delta \} + \lambda (1 - 1_C(y_0, y_1)) \text{ with } \lambda = \infty \}.
\]

Note that at the optimum \( \varphi(y_0) + \psi(y_1) = 1 \{ y_1 - y_0 < \delta \} \) for any \((y_0, y_1)\) in the support of the optimal joint distribution. Therefore, dual functions \( \varphi \) and \( \psi \) can be written as follows: for any \((y_0, y_1)\) in the support of the optimal joint distribution,

\[
\varphi(y_0) = \inf_{y_1:(y_0,y_1)\in C} \{ 1 \{ y_1 - y_0 < \delta \} - \psi(y_1) \}.
\]

In my proof of Theorem 1, \( A_k \) is defined as \( A_k = \{ x \in \mathbb{R} : \varphi(x) > s + k \} \) for the function \( \varphi \), some \( s \in [0, 1] \), and each integer \( k \). Since the dual function \( \varphi \) is continuous, if \( \varphi \) is nondecreasing then \( A_k = (a_k, \infty) \) for some \( a_k \in [-\infty, \infty] \). Note that \( A_k = \phi \) for \( a_k = \infty \). Also, since \( \{A_k\}_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} \) is a monotonically decreasing sequence of open sets, \( a_k \leq a_{k+1} \) for every integer \( k \). In contrast, if \( \varphi \) is nonincreasing at the optimum then \( A_k = (-\infty, a_k) \) for \( a_k \in [-\infty, \infty] \) and \( a_{k+1} \leq a_k \) for each integer \( k \). Note that \( A_k = \phi \) for \( a_k = -\infty \). In the next subsection, I will show that the function \( \varphi \) is monotone for economic examples considered in this paper and that sharp DTE bounds in each example are readily derived from monotonicity of \( \varphi \).

**Remark 3 (Robustness of the sharp bounds)** *My sharp DTE bounds are robust for support restrictions in the sense that they do not rely too heavily on the small deviation of the restriction. I can verify this by showing that sharp bounds under \( \Pr((Y_0, Y_1) \in C) \geq p \) converge to those under \( \Pr((Y_0, Y_1) \in C) = 1 \), as \( p \) goes to one. The sharp lower bound under \( \Pr((Y_0, Y_1) \in C) \geq p \) can be obtained with a multiplier \( \tilde{\lambda}_p \geq 0 \) as follows:*

\[
F^L_\Delta(\delta) = \inf_{\pi \in \Pi(\mu_0, \mu_1)} \int \left\{ 1 \{ y_1 - y_0 < \delta \} + \tilde{\lambda}_p (1 - 1_C(y_0, y_1)) \right\} d\pi.
\]

(12)

*Obviously, \( \tilde{\lambda}_0 = 0 \). Furthermore, \( \tilde{\lambda}_p \leq \tilde{\lambda}_q \) for \( 0 \leq p < q \leq 1 \) since \( F^L_\Delta(\delta) \) is nondecreasing in \( p \). The proof of Theorem 1 can be easily adapted to the more general case in which the multiplier is given as a positive integer. If \( \tilde{\lambda}_p = 2K \) in (12) for some positive integer \( K \), then the dual representation reduces to*

\[
\sup_{\{A_k\}_{k=-\infty}^{-(K-1)}} \sum_{k=-(K-1)}^K \max \left\{ \mu_0(A_k) - \mu_1(A_k^C), 0 \right\},
\]

*where \( \{A_k\}_{k=-(K-1)}^K \) is monotonically decreasing. As \( K \) goes to infinity, this obviously converges to the dual representation for the infinite Lagrange multiplier, which is given in (11).*
Source: guidebook

<table>
  <tr>
    <th>Field Name</th>
    <th>Description</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Field</td>
    <td>Shows the field name for which the summary function is being used.</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Summary function</td>
    <td>Shows the special value used to summarize the field values. The following summary function special values can be specified to print the summary data.<br><br>*FIRST The first value in the specified field.<br><br>*LAST The last value in the specified field.<br><br>*TOTAL The total of the values in the specified field. This summary data is effective for numeric fields, excluding floating-point data. The number of integer digits of the total is the number of integer digits of the field plus three. For example, the total of the field whose integer digits are three and the fractional digits are two is printed as numeric data with six integer digits and two fractional digits.<br><br>*AVG The average of the value in the specified field. This summary data is effective for numeric fields, excluding floating-point data.<br><br>*MAX The maximum value in the specified field.<br><br>*MIN The minimum value in the specified field.<br><br>*CNT The record count. It is printed as an 8 digit integer. If there is a record whose field value is null, the record is not counted.</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Edit code</td>
    <td>Specifies the edit code in which the summary data is printed. The allowable edit codes (1-9, A-D, J-Q, X-Z) and their printout format are the same as those supported on DDS. If this parameter is not specified, the Print Format Utility prints the field based on the editing information defined by DDS or IDDU except for the record count. The Print Format Utility prints the record count with the leading zeros suppression by blanks if an edit code is not specified.</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Edit code modifier</td>
    <td>This parameter is optional. It is effective only when one of 1-4, A-D, and J-Q is specified on the edit code parameter.<br><br>1 An asterisk (*) is printed for each zero that is suppressed. A complete field of asterisks is printed for a zero balance field.<br><br>2 The currency symbol defined on the system value QCURSYM is printed on the left of the first significant digit. The symbol is not printed on a zero balance when an edit code is used that suppresses the zero balance.</td>
  </tr>
</table>

When you specify the above parameters and press the Enter key, the Define Text Detail display (or the Define Box Detail display) appears again.

When you specify multiple summary data on the Text data prompt, the Select Fields to Define Summary Data display appears. You can select fields to change the summary function or specify an edit code on the display.

The Define Summary Data display appears repeatedly for each selected field.

If you specify break fields, you can print the summary data for each page break or for each page by specifying Y or N for the Print at page break only prompt on the Define Text Detail display (or the Define Box Detail display). The Print at page break only prompt appears at the bottom of the Detail display, and it appears only when
Source: guidebook

HELICOPTER ROUTE CHARTS

GENERAL INFORMATION

Helicopter Route Charts are three-color charts that depict current aeronautical information useful to helicopter pilots navigating in areas with high concentrations of helicopter activity. Information depicted includes helicopter routes, four classes of heliports with associated frequency and lighting capabilities, NAVAIDS, and obstructions. In addition, pictorial symbols, roads, and easily-identified geographical features are portrayed. The scale is 1:125,000. These charts are updated every three years or as needed to accommodate major changes.

AIRPORTS

Landplane
All recognizable runways, including some which may be closed, are shown for visual identification.
Public
Private
Unverified
Abandoned

Seaplane

Airport Data Grouping
Boxed airport name indicates airport for which a Special Traffic Rule has been established.
(Pvt): Non-public use having emergency or landmark value. "OBJECTIONABLE": This airport may adversely affect airspace use.
Flight Service Station on field FSS
Airspace where fixed wing special visual flight rules operations are prohibited (shown above airport name) FAR 91 NO SVFR
Indicates FAR 93 Special Air Traffic Rules and Airport Traffic NAME
Location Identifer (NAM)
ICAO Location Identifier (PNAM)
Control Tower (CT) - primary frequency CT - 119.1
Star indicates operation part-time. See tower frequencies tabulation for hours of operation *

When lighting is lacking, the respective character is replaced by a dash.

Lighting codes refer to runway edge lights and may not represent the longest runway or full length lighting. Dashes are not shown on heliports or helipads unless additional information follows the elevation (e.g. UNICOM, CTAF).

Heliport
Heliports public and private H
Medical Center +
Helipads located at major airports (when requested) U
Ultralight Flight Park F

Automated Terminal Information Service ATIS 115.4
Automated Surface Weather Observing Systems (shown when full-time ATIS is not available). Some ASOS/AWOS facilities may not be located at airports. ASOS/AWOS 135.42
Elevation in feet 285
Lighting in operation Sunset to Sunshine L
Lighting limitations exists, refer to Chart Supplement 'L
UNICOM - Aeronautical advisory station 122.95
Follows the Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF) C
Unverified Heliport (Unverified)
Airport of Entry AOE
Source: finance

<table>
  <tr>
    <th colspan="5">Subsidiaries and affiliates accounted for by the equity method</th>
    <th colspan="2">As of Mar. 31, 2006</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th>Company</th>
    <th>Location</th>
    <th>Principal business</th>
    <th>Capital (millions)</th>
    <th>Nissan share*</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th colspan="6">Japan</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Nissan Diesel Motor Co., Ltd.</td>
    <td>Ageo Saitama</td>
    <td>Manufacture and sales of automobiles and parts</td>
    <td>¥65,835</td>
    <td>24.38</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Kinugawa Rubber Industrial Co., Ltd.</td>
    <td>Chiba, Chiba</td>
    <td>Manufacture and sales of automotive parts</td>
    <td>¥5,655</td>
    <td>20.25</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th colspan="6">France</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Renault</td>
    <td>Billancourt</td>
    <td>Manufacture and sales of automobiles and parts</td>
    <td>€1,086</td>
    <td>15.00</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="4">Other subsidiaries and affiliates accounted for by the equity method</td>
    <td>17 companies</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="4">Total subsidiaries and affiliates accounted for by the equity method</td>
    <td>20 companies</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="6">* Percent of voting rights held by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.</td>
  </tr>
</table>
Source: finance

<table>
  <tr>
    <th rowspan="2">Note</th>
    <th colspan="2">Consolidated</th>
    <th colspan="2">Santos Ltd</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th>2004 $million</th>
    <th>2003 $million</th>
    <th>2004 $million</th>
    <th>2003 $million</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Product sales</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>1,500.9</td>
    <td>1,465.0</td>
    <td>568.8</td>
    <td>616.3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Cost of sales</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>(1,049.8)</td>
    <td>(974.4)</td>
    <td>(414.5)</td>
    <td>(356.6)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Gross profit</td>
    <td></td>
    <td>451.1</td>
    <td>490.6</td>
    <td>154.3</td>
    <td>259.7</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Other revenue</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>252.3</td>
    <td>154.4</td>
    <td>858.0</td>
    <td>126.2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Other expenses</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>(129.0)</td>
    <td>(179.5)</td>
    <td>(221.0)</td>
    <td>(108.3)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Borrowing costs</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>(33.6)</td>
    <td>(34.6)</td>
    <td>(91.1)</td>
    <td>(84.0)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><b>Profit from ordinary activities before income tax expense</b></td>
    <td></td>
    <td>540.8</td>
    <td>430.9</td>
    <td>700.2</td>
    <td>193.6</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Income tax expense relating to ordinary activities</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>(160.9)</td>
    <td>(103.9)</td>
    <td>(57.1)</td>
    <td>(10.7)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><b>Net profit after income tax attributable to the shareholders of Santos Ltd</b></td>
    <td></td>
    <td>379.9</td>
    <td>327.0</td>
    <td>643.1</td>
    <td>182.9</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Net exchange differences relating to self-sustaining foreign operations</td>
    <td>19</td>
    <td>(0.2)</td>
    <td>(4.7)</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>–</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><b>Total changes in equity from non-owner related transactions attributable to the shareholders of Santos Ltd</b></td>
    <td></td>
    <td>379.7</td>
    <td>322.3</td>
    <td>643.1</td>
    <td>182.9</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th>Earnings per share (cents)</th>
    <th></th>
    <th></th>
    <th></th>
    <th></th>
    <th></th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Basic</td>
    <td>21</td>
    <td>58.6</td>
    <td>52.1</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Diluted</td>
    <td>21</td>
    <td>58.5</td>
    <td>51.5</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</table>

The statements of financial performance are to be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.
Source: finance

7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The directors of Mermaid Marine Australia Limited during the Financial Year were:

A G Birchmore (appointed 12 August 1998)
J H Carver (appointed 29 June 1998)
D A Dillon (appointed 12 August 1998)
J A S Mews (appointed 12 August 1998)

Interest in the shares of the Company held by directors and their director related entities as at 30 June 2000.

<table>
  <tr>
    <th></th>
    <th>Mermaid Marine Australia Limited<br>Ordinary Shares</th>
    <th>Options over Ordinary Shares</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>A G Birchmore</td>
    <td>13,695,300</td>
    <td>382,000</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>J H Carver</td>
    <td>13,631,300</td>
    <td>20,000</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>D A Dillon</td>
    <td>1,520,000</td>
    <td>10,000</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>J A S Mews</td>
    <td>1,500,000</td>
    <td>_</td>
  </tr>
</table>

The following related party transactions occurred during the Financial Year:

Transactions with directors and director related entities

During the Financial Year, a total of $75,000 for directors fees was paid to Chalfont Holdings Limited, a related entity of A G Birchmore. This is reflected in full in note 24 – Remuneration of Directors.

Transactions with other related parties

(a) Mermaid Achiever

The Achiever Partnership (comprising Delmark Investments Pty Ltd, a related entity of A G Birchmore, J H Carver, D A Dillon and P D M Holdings Pty Ltd, a related entity of J A S Mews) entered into a put and call option agreement with the Company on 12 April 1999, pursuant to which it was agreed that either party could, at any time between 30 June 2000 and the expiration of the Company’s Charter of the Mermaid Achiever from the Achiever Partnership, oblige the other party to enter into an Agreement for the sale and purchase of that vessel at price fixed at $3,250,000.

On 24 September 1999 the Company exercised its option to acquire the Mermaid Achiever in accordance with the terms of the above option. Bareboat Charter Fees of $184,000 were paid for the period 1st July 1999 to the 30th September 2000 the effective date of settlement.

(b) Fremantle Premises

(i) The Achiever Partnership and the Company entered into a heads of agreement dated 12 April 1999 for the lease to the entity of its registered office at 20 Mews Road, Fremantle.

(ii) The term of the lease is 5 years with a 5 year option of renewal in favour of the Company.

(iii) The Company is responsible for all fitting out, maintenance (except capital works items), rates, taxes, insurance, and other usual variable outgoings.

(iv) The offices have undergone substantial refurbishment.
Source: finance

The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plan was $4,801,000 and $4,170,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The components of net periodic pension cost for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were as follows (in thousands):

<table>
  <tr>
    <th></th>
    <th>2003</th>
    <th>2002</th>
    <th>2001</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th colspan="4">COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC PENSION COST:</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Service cost</td>
    <td>$ 214</td>
    <td>$ 320</td>
    <td>$ 369</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Interest cost</td>
    <td>298</td>
    <td>307</td>
    <td>296</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Expected return on assets</td>
    <td>(349)</td>
    <td>(405)</td>
    <td>(477)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Prior service cost amortization</td>
    <td>(37)</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>6</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Actuarial loss</td>
    <td>128</td>
    <td>28</td>
    <td>—</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Transition amount amortization</td>
    <td>(44)</td>
    <td>(44)</td>
    <td>(44)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th>Net periodic pension cost</th>
    <th>$ 210</th>
    <th>$ 213</th>
    <th>$ 150</th>
  </tr>
</table>

Actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31 were as follows:

<table>
  <tr>
    <th></th>
    <th>2003</th>
    <th>2002</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Discount rate</td>
    <td>6.50%</td>
    <td>7.00%</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Rate of compensation increase</td>
    <td>5.00%</td>
    <td>5.00%</td>
  </tr>
</table>

Actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost were as follows:

<table>
  <tr>
    <th></th>
    <th>2003</th>
    <th>2002</th>
    <th>2001</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Discount rate</td>
    <td>7.00%</td>
    <td>7.25%</td>
    <td>7.25%</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Expected long-term return on assets</td>
    <td>8.00%</td>
    <td>9.00%</td>
    <td>9.00%</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Rate of compensation increase</td>
    <td>5.00%</td>
    <td>5.00%</td>
    <td>5.00%</td>
  </tr>
</table>

The Company's expected long-term rate of return assumption is based upon the plan's actual long-term investment results as well as the long-term outlook for investment returns in the marketplace at the time the assumption is made. The reduction in the Company's assumption for this expected return rate in the beginning of 2003 to 8 percent from 9 percent reflected the major downturn in returns on debt and equity investments that occurred in the investment markets in 2001 and 2002.

The Company's pension plan assets at December 31, 2003 and 2002 were invested in the following asset categories:

<table>
  <tr>
    <th></th>
    <th>2003</th>
    <th>2002</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Equity securities</td>
    <td>73%</td>
    <td>64%</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Debt securities</td>
    <td>25%</td>
    <td>28%</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Other</td>
    <td>2%</td>
    <td>8%</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th>Total</th>
    <th>100%</th>
    <th>100%</th>
  </tr>
</table>
Source: finance

29. Key management personnel disclosures continued

Loan to Director
Details of the loan made to a Director of Kingsgate are set out below:

(i) Aggregates for Key Management Personnel

<table>
  <tr>
    <th></th>
    <th>Balance at start of year $</th>
    <th>Interest paid and payable for the year $</th>
    <th>Interest not charged $</th>
    <th>Balance at end of year $</th>
    <th>Number in Group at the end of the year $</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2013</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>2,603</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>160,000</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>2012</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>–</td>
  </tr>
</table>

(ii) Loan made during the financial year

2013
Name
G Thomas
<table>
  <tr>
    <th></th>
    <th>Balance at start of year $</th>
    <th>Interest paid and payable for the year $</th>
    <th>Interest not charged $</th>
    <th>Balance at end of year $</th>
    <th>Highest indebtedness during the year $</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>G Thomas</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>2,603</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>160,000</td>
    <td>160,000</td>
  </tr>
</table>

There were no loans to Directors or other Key Management Personnel at any time during the previous year.
No write-downs or allowances for doubtful receivables have been recognised in relation to the loan made to Gavin Thomas.
This loan was repaid in full post year-end.

30. Auditors remuneration

<table>
  <tr>
    <th></th>
    <th>2013</th>
    <th>2012</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Audit and other assurance services<br>PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian Firm<br>Audit and review of the financial reports</td>
    <td>663,970</td>
    <td>507,300</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Related Practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian Firm<br>Audit and review of the financial statements</td>
    <td>296,108</td>
    <td>228,378</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Non PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit Firm<br>Audit and review of the financial reports</td>
    <td>6,641</td>
    <td>–</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Total remuneration for audit services</td>
    <td>966,719</td>
    <td>735,678</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Other services<br>PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian Firm<br>Transaction services (IPO)</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>25,125</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Other services<br>Related Practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian Firm</td>
    <td>17,207</td>
    <td>28,055</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Other services</td>
    <td>10,950</td>
    <td>–</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Total remuneration for non-audit related services</td>
    <td>28,157</td>
    <td>53,180</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Taxation services<br>PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian Firm<br>Tax compliance services</td>
    <td>133,775</td>
    <td>78,310</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Legal services (Class Order and tax consolidation agreements)<br>Related Practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian Firm</td>
    <td>–</td>
    <td>25,870</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Tax compliance services</td>
    <td>42,744</td>
    <td>32,949</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td>Total remuneration for tax related services</td>
    <td>176,519</td>
    <td>137,129</td>
  </tr>
</table>