The following selected Consolidated Financial Data for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2013 have been derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements. Such data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in
The volume of business from new and existing customers, fluctuations in insurable exposure units and changes in general economic and competitive conditions all affect our revenues. For example, level rates of inflation or a general decline in economic activity could limit increases in the values of insurable exposure units. Conversely, the increasing costs of litigation settlements and awards have caused some customers to seek higher levels of insurance coverage. Historically, our revenues have typically grown as a result of our focus on net new business growth and acquisitions.
We attempt to foster a strong, decentralized sales culture with a goal of consistent, sustained growth over the long term.
The years 2007 through 2011 posed significant challenges for us and for our industry in the form of a prevailing decline in insurance premium rates, commonly referred to as a “soft market” and increased significant governmental involvement in the Florida insurance marketplace which resulted in a substantial loss of revenues for us. Additionally, beginning in the second half of 2008 and throughout 2011, there was a general decline in insurable exposure units as the consequence of the general weakening of the economy in the United States. As a result, from the first quarter of 2007 through the fourth quarter of 2011 we experienced negative internal revenue growth each quarter. The continued declining exposure units during 2011 and 2010 had a greater negative impact on our commissions and fees revenues than declining insurance premium rates.
core commissions and fees earned for the first twelve months by newly-acquired operations and (ii) divested business (core commissions and fees generated from offices, books of business or niches sold or terminated during the comparable period). “Core organic commissions and fees” are reported in this manner in order to express the current year’s core commissions and fees on a comparable basis with the prior year’s core commissions and fees. The resulting net change reflects the aggregate changes attributable to (i) net new and lost accounts, (ii) net changes in our clients’ exposure units, and (iii) net changes in insurance premium rates. The net changes in each of these three components can be determined for each of our customers. However, because our agency management accounting systems do not aggregate such data, it is not reportable. Core organic commissions and fees can reflect either “positive” growth with a net increase in revenues, or “negative” growth with a net decrease in revenues.
Beginning a few years ago, five to six national insurance companies replaced their loss-ratio based profit-sharing contingent commission agreements with a new guaranteed fixed-base agreements, referred to as “Guaranteed Supplemental Commissions” (“GSCs”). For 2013, only four national insurance companies still used GSCs in lieu of loss-ratio based profit-sharing contingent commissions. Since GSCs are not subject to the uncertainty of loss ratios, they are accrued throughout the year based on actual premiums written. As of December 31, 2013, we accrued and earned $8.3 million of GSCs during 2013, most of which will be collected in the first quarter of 2014. For the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we earned $8.3 million, $9.1 million and $12.1 million, respectively, of GSCs.
Fee revenues relate to fees negotiated in lieu of commissions, which are recognized as services are rendered. Fee revenues have historically been generated primarily by: (1) our Services Division, which provides insurance-related services, including third-party claims administration and comprehensive medical utilization management services in both the workers’ compensation and all-lines liability arenas, as well as Medicare set-aside services, Social Security disability and Medicare benefits advocacy services, and catastrophe claims adjusting services, and (2) our National Programs and Wholesale Brokerage Divisions, which earn fees primarily for the issuance of insurance policies on behalf of insurance companies. These services are provided over a period of time, typically one year. However, in conjunction with our July 1, 2013 acquisition of Beecher Carlson, which has a primary focus on large retail customers that generally pay us fees directly, the fee revenues in our Retail Division for 2013 have increased by nearly $40.0 million to $73.0 million. For 2014, we expect the total fees in our Retail Division to be approximately $110.0 million. Fee revenues, on a consolidated basis, as a percentage of our total commissions and fees, represented 26.6% in 2013, 21.7% in 2012 and 16.4% in 2011.
We continue to be successful in acquiring insurance operations that we believe are strategic in growing our business Divisions. In each of the last two years, we completed acquisitions with aggregate revenues in excess of $142.8 million: nine acquisitions in 2013 with estimated revenues of $142.8 million, and 20 acquisitions in 2012 with estimated revenues of $149.6 million. For 2014, we are continuing this trend with the announced acquisition of Wright Insurance Group, with estimated annualized revenues of $120.0 million, which is expected to close on or around April 1, 2014.
new acquisitions that “folded in” to those offices) increased by $38.5 million. The net increase of $38.5 million related primarily to: (1) net new business, (2) a $2.6 million benefit from a change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables, and (3) a one-time $6.8 million bonus earned in 2012 by our Retail Division commissioned producers as a result of a special program for those whose 2012 production exceeded their 2011 production by at least five percent. These net increases were partially off-set by a $6.6 million increase in non-cash stock-based compensation primarily due to new grants issued in July 2013. Therefore, excluding these items, income before income taxes from those offices that existed in the same time periods of 2013 and 2012 (including the new acquisitions that “folded in” to those offices) increased by $37.7 million.
On July 1, 2013, we completed the acquisition of Beecher Carlson Holdings, Inc. (“Beecher Carlson”), an insurance and risk management broker with operations that include retail brokerage, program management and captive management. The aggregate purchase price for Beecher Carlson was $469.3 million, including $364.3 million of cash payments and the assumption of $105.0 million of liabilities. Beecher Carlson was acquired primarily to expand Brown & Brown’s Retail and National Programs businesses, and to attract and hire high-quality individuals.
Commission revenues are recognized as of the effective date of the insurance policy or the date on which the policy premium is billed to the customer, whichever is later. Commission revenues related to installment billings at the Company’s subsidiary, Arrowhead, are recorded on the later of the effective date of the policy or the first installment billing. At those dates, the earnings process has been completed, and we can reliably estimate the impact of policy cancellations for refunds and establish reserves accordingly. Management determines the policy cancellation reserve based upon historical cancellation experience adjusted in accordance with known circumstances. Subsequent commission adjustments are recognized upon our receipt of notification from insurance companies concerning matters necessitating such adjustments. Profit-sharing contingent commissions are recognized when determinable, which is when such commissions are received from insurance companies, or when we receive formal notification of the amount of such payments. Fee revenues are recognized as services are rendered.
All of our business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 have been accounted for using the purchase method. In connection with these acquisitions, we record the estimated value of the net tangible assets purchased and the value of the identifiable intangible assets purchased, which typically consist of purchased customer accounts and non-compete agreements. Purchased customer accounts include the physical records and files obtained from acquired businesses that contain information about insurance policies, customers and other matters essential to policy renewals. However, they primarily represent the present value of the underlying cash flows expected to be received over the estimated future renewal periods of the insurance policies comprising those purchased customer accounts. The valuation of purchased customer accounts involves significant estimates and assumptions concerning matters such as cancellation frequency, expenses and discount rates. Any change in these assumptions could affect the carrying value of purchased customer accounts. Non-compete agreements are valued based on their duration and any unique features of particular agreements. Purchased customer accounts and non-compete agreements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related estimated lives and contract periods, which range from five to 15 years. The excess of the purchase price of an acquisition over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets is assigned to goodwill and is not amortized.
Investment income decreased to $0.6 million in 2013, compared with $0.8 million in 2012, mainly due to lower average daily invested balances in 2013 than in 2012. Investment income of $0.8 million in 2012 was down $0.5 million as compared with 2011, mainly due to lower average daily invested balances in 2012 than in 2011.
Other income for 2013 reflected income of $7.1 million, compared with $10.2 million in 2012 and $6.3 million in 2011. We recognized gains of $3.1 million, $4.3 million and $2.3 million from sales of books of business (customer accounts) in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Although we are not in the business of selling books of business, we periodically will sell an office or a book of business because it does not produce reasonable margins or demonstrate a potential for growth, or for other reasons related to the particular assets in question. Other income also included $1.6 million, $3.6 million and $1.3 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, paid to us in connection with settlements of litigation against former employees for violation of restrictive covenants contained in their employment agreements with us. Additionally, we recognized non-recurring gains, rental income and sales of software services of $2.4 million, $2.3 million and $2.3 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Employee compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of total revenues decreased in 2013 to 50.1% as compared to 50.7% for 2012 and 50.2% for 2011. We had 6,992 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2013, compared with 6,438 at December 31, 2012 and 5,557 at December 31, 2011. Of the net increase of 554 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2013 over the prior year-end, an increase of 374 was attributable to acquisitions, thus reflecting a net increase of 180 employees in the offices existing at both year-ends.
As a percentage of total revenues, other operating expenses represented 14.4% in 2013, 14.5% in 2012, and 14.2% in 2011.
As of December 31, 2013, the fair values of the estimated acquisition earn-out payables were re-evaluated and measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3). The resulting net changes, as well as the interest expense accretion on the estimated acquisition earn-out payables, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
Income before income taxes for 2012 increased 5.4%, or $7.4 million, over the same period in 2011, to $145.2 million. Included in the $7.4 million net increase in income before income taxes is another $7.4 million net expense increase in change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables and a $0.3 million net expense increase from amortization, depreciation and inter-company interest changes. Excluding these items and the $4.1 million decrease in profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs, income before income taxes for 2012 increased $19.2 million over 2011, of which $8.7 million originated from new acquisitions that were stand-alone operations, and $10.5 million was generated by offices in existence in both 2011 and 2012. Of the $10.5 million increase from existing offices, $8.7 million ($1.4 million of fold-in acquired revenues) was attributed to organic growth of core commissions and fees, $5.6 million cost savings from other operating expenses, $0.5 reduction in non-cash stock-based compensation, but partially offset by $4.9 million increase in compensation and employee benefits. The $4.9 million net increase in compensation and employee benefits was primarily due to the one-time producer bonuses of $6.8 million paid to commissioned producers whose 2012 production exceeded their 2011 production by at least five percent, which was partially offset by a reduction of approximately $2.0 million less staff salaries. The $5.6 million reduction in other operating expenses was primarily related to reductions in occupancy/office rents, legal and claims settlements, insurance expense, and data processing costs.
Income before income taxes for 2013 increased 13.4% or $6.9 million, over the same period in 2012, to $58.4 million. This net increase was primarily due to the new automobile aftermarket and the non-standard auto programs at our Arrowhead subsidiary. Even though these programs increased the total operating profit dollars for the Division, the ratios of employee compensation and benefits, and other operating expenses as a percentage to total revenues increased over the prior year was due to the fact that these programs operated at a higher cost factor than the average program operated in 2012.
Unlike our other segments, nearly all of the Services Division’s 2013 commissions and fees revenue was generated from fees, which are not significantly affected by fluctuations in general insurance premiums.
The Services Division’s total revenues for 2013 increased 12.6%, or $14.8 million, over 2012, to $131.5 million. Of the $14.8 million net increase in core commissions and fees revenue: (i) an increase of approximately $0.7 million related to the core commissions and fees revenue from the TPA business acquired as part of the Arrowhead acquisition, that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2012; and (ii) net new business of $14.1 million, of which $13.0 million was due to our Colonial Claims operation and the impact of the significant flood claims resulting from the 2012 Superstorm Sandy. As such, the Services Division’s internal growth rate for core organic commissions and fees revenue was 12.2% for 2013.
Income before income taxes in 2013 increased 46.2%, or $7.7 million, over 2012, to $24.5 million, primarily due to net new business from our Colonial Claims operation. Additionally, this net increase was enhanced by a $1.3 million reduction in inter-company interest expense, but partially offset by a $2.4 million expense from changes in estimated earn-out payables.
As discussed in Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the “Other” column in the Segment Information table includes all income and expenses not allocated to reportable segments, as well as corporate-related items, including the inter-company interest expense charges to reporting segments.
Our cash and cash equivalents of $203.0 million at December 31, 2013 reflected a decrease of $16.9 million from the $219.8 million balance at December 31, 2012. During 2013, $389.4 million of cash was provided from operating activities. Also during this period, $367.7 million of cash was used for acquisitions, $15.5 million was used for acquisition earn-out payments, $16.4 million was used for additions to fixed assets, $30.0 million was provided from proceeds received on new long-term debt, and $53.5 million was used for payment of dividends.
Our cash and cash equivalents of $286.3 million at December 31, 2011 reflected an increase of $13.3 million from the $273.0 million balance at December 31, 2010. During 2011, $237.5 million of cash was provided from operating activities. Also during this period, $166.1 million of cash was used for acquisitions, $8.8 million was used for acquisition earn-out payments, $13.6 million was used for additions to fixed assets, $102.1 million was used for payments on long-term debt and $46.5 million was used for payment of dividends. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2011, we borrowed $100.0 million on our Master Agreement to fund the repayment of our $100.0 million of Series A Senior Notes that matured on September 15, 2011.
On January 9, 2012, we completed the acquisition of Arrowhead for a total cash purchase price of $397.0 million, subject to certain adjustments and potential earn-out payments of up to $5 million in the aggregate following the third anniversary of the acquisition’s closing date. We financed the acquisition through various modified and new credit facilities.
On July 1, 2013, we completed the acquisition of Beecher Carlson Holding, Inc. for a total cash purchase price of $364.2 million, subject to certain adjustments. We financed the acquisition through various modified and new credit facilities.
On October 12, 2012, we entered into a Master Note Facility Agreement (the “New Master Agreement”) with another national insurance company (the “New Purchaser”). The New Purchaser also purchased Notes issued by us in 2004. The New Master Agreement provides for a $125.0 million private uncommitted “shelf” facility for the issuance of unsecured senior notes over a three-year period, with interest rates that may be fixed or floating and with such maturity dates, not to exceed ten years, as the parties may determine. The New Master Agreement includes various covenants, limitations and events of default similar to the Master Agreement. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no borrowings against this facility.
On January 9, 2012, we entered into: (1) an amended and restated revolving and term loan credit agreement (the “SunTrust Agreement”) with SunTrust Bank (“SunTrust”) that provides for (a) a $100.0 million term loan (the “SunTrust Term Loan”) and (b) a $50.0 million revolving line of credit (the “SunTrust Revolver”) and (2) a $50.0 million promissory note (the “JPM Note”) in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”), pursuant to a letter agreement executed by JP Morgan (together with the JPM Note, (the “JPM Agreement”) that provided for a $50.0 million uncommitted line of credit bridge facility (the “JPM Bridge Facility”). The SunTrust Term Loan, the SunTrust Revolver and the JPM Bridge Facility were each funded on January 9, 2012, and provided the financing for the Arrowhead acquisition. The SunTrust Agreement amended and restated the Prior Loan Agreement.
The maturity date for the JPM Bridge Facility was February 3, 2012, at which time all outstanding principal and unpaid interest would have been due. On January 26, 2012, we entered into a term loan agreement (the “JPM Agreement”) with JPMorgan that provided for a $100.0 million term loan (the “JPM Term Loan”). The JPM Term Loan was fully funded on January 26, 2012, and provided the financing to fully repay (1) the JPM Bridge Facility and (2) the SunTrust Revolver. As a result of the January 26, 2012 financing and repayments, the JPM Bridge Facility was terminated and the SunTrust Revolver’s amount outstanding was reduced to zero. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no borrowings against the SunTrust Revolver.
The Notes, the Master Agreement, the SunTrust Agreement, the JPM Agreement and the Bank of America Agreement require that we maintain certain financial ratios and comply with certain other covenants. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investment portfolio and funds generated from operations, together with the SunTrust Revolver, the New Master Agreement, and the Wells Fargo Revolver will be sufficient to satisfy our
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and
Commission revenues are recognized as of the effective date of the insurance policy or the date on which the policy premium is billed to the customer, whichever is later. Commission revenues related to installment billings at the Company’s subsidiary, Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Arrowhead”), are recorded on the later of the effective date of the policy or the first installment billing. At those dates, the earnings process has been completed, and Brown & Brown can reliably estimate the impact of policy cancellations for refunds and establish reserves accordingly. The reserve for policy cancellations is based upon historical cancellation experience adjusted for known circumstances. The policy cancellation reserve was $8,010,000 and $7,174,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and it is periodically evaluated and adjusted as necessary. Subsequent commission adjustments are recognized upon receipt of notification from the insurance companies. Commission revenues are reported net of commissions paid to sub-brokers or co-brokers. Profit-sharing contingent commissions from insurance companies are recognized when determinable, which is when such commissions, or official notification of the amount of such commissions is received. Fee income is recognized as services are rendered.
Effective in 2009, the Company adopted new Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance that states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and, therefore, are included in computing earnings per share (“EPS”) pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. Performance stock shares granted to employees under the Company’s Performance Stock Plan and under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan are considered participating securities as they receive non-forfeitable dividend equivalents at the same rate as common stock.
The carrying amounts of Brown & Brown’s financial assets and liabilities, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments, investments, premiums, commissions and fees receivable, premiums payable to insurance companies, premium deposits and credits due customers and accounts payable, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of Brown & Brown’s long-term debt approximates fair value at December 31, 2013 and 2012 because the related coupon rate approximates the current market rate.
The following table summarizes the aggregate purchase price allocation made as of the date of each acquisition for current year acquisitions and adjustment made during the measurement period for prior year acquisitions:
Goodwill of $295,944,000 was allocated to the Retail, National Programs, Wholesale Brokerage and Services Divisions in the amounts of $257,196,000, $27,091,000, ($812,000) and $12,469,000, respectively. Of the total goodwill of $295,944,000, $41,663,000 is currently deductible for income tax purposes and $249,190,000 is non-deductible. The remaining $5,091,000 relates to the recorded earn-out payables and will not be deductible until it is earned and paid.
The results of operations for the acquisitions completed during 2013 have been combined with those of the Company since their respective acquisition dates. The total revenues and income before income taxes from the acquisitions completed through December 31, 2013, included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, were $63,797,000 and $872,000, respectively. If the acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of the period, the Company’s results of operations would be as shown in the following table. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods.
The acquisitions made in 2012 have been accounted for as business combinations and are as follows:
Goodwill of $390,640,000, was allocated to the Retail, National Programs, Wholesale Brokerage and Services Divisions in the amounts of $57,856,000, $289,378,000, $11,656,000 and $31,750,000, respectively. Of the total goodwill of $390,640,000, $52,730,000 is currently deductible for income tax purposes and $316,431,000 is non-deductible. The remaining $21,479,000 relates to the recorded earn-out payables and will not be deductible until it is earned and paid.
During 2011, Brown & Brown acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of 37 insurance intermediaries, all of the stock of one insurance intermediary and several books of business (customer accounts). The aggregate purchase price of these acquisitions was $214,822,000, including $167,444,000 of cash payments, the issuance of $1,194,000 in notes payable, the assumption of $15,659,000 of liabilities and $30,525,000 of recorded earn-out payables. All of these acquisitions were acquired primarily to expand Brown & Brown’s core businesses and to attract high-quality personnel. Acquisition purchase prices are typically based on a multiple of average annual operating profit earned over a one-to three-year period within a minimum and maximum price range. The recorded purchase price for all acquisitions consummated after January 1, 2009 included an estimation of the fair value of liabilities associated with any potential earn-out provisions. Subsequent changes in the fair value of earn-out obligations will be recorded in the consolidated statement of income when incurred.
The weighted average useful lives for the above acquired amortizable intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts, 15.0 years; noncompete agreements, 5.0 years.
For acquisitions consummated prior to January 1, 2009, additional consideration paid to sellers as a result of purchase price earn-out provisions are recorded as adjustments to intangible assets when the contingencies are settled. The net additional consideration paid by the Company in 2013 as a result of these adjustments totaled $873,000, all of which was allocated to goodwill. Of the $873,000 net additional consideration paid, $873,000 was issued in other payables. The net additional consideration paid by the Company in 2012 as a result of these adjustments totaled $2,907,000, all of which was allocated to goodwill. Of the $2,907,000 net additional consideration paid, $2,907,000 was paid in cash.
ASC Topic 805-Business Combinations is the authoritative guidance requiring an acquirer to recognize 100% of the fair values of acquired assets, including goodwill, and assumed liabilities (with only limited exceptions) upon initially obtaining control of an acquired entity. Additionally, the fair value of contingent consideration arrangements (such as earn-out purchase arrangements) at the acquisition date must be included in the purchase price consideration. As a result, the recorded purchase prices for all acquisitions consummated after January 1, 2009 include an estimation of the fair value of liabilities associated with any potential earn-out provisions. Subsequent changes in these earn-out obligations will be recorded in the consolidated statement of income when incurred. Potential earn-out obligations are typically based upon future earnings of the acquired entities, usually between one and three years.
Of the $43,058,000 estimated acquisition earn-out payables as of December 31, 2013, $6,312,000 was recorded as accounts payable and $36,746,000 was recorded as other non-current liabilities. Of the $52,987,000 in estimated acquisition earn-out payables as of December 31, 2012, $10,164,000 was recorded as accounts payable and $42,823,000 was recorded as other non-current liabilities.
The following table summarizes the proceeds and realized gains/(losses) on equity securities and certificates of deposit for the years ended December 31:
In July 2004, the Company completed a private placement of $200.0 million of unsecured senior notes (the “Notes”). The $200.0 million was divided into two series: (1) Series A, which closed on September 15, 2004, for $100.0 million due in 2011 and bore interest at 5.57% per year; and (2) Series B, which closed on July 15, 2004, for $100.0 million due in 2014 and bearing interest at 6.08% per year. The Company has used the proceeds from the Notes for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and repayment of existing debt. On September 15, 2011, the $100.0 million of Series A Notes were redeemed on their normal maturity date. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there was an outstanding balance on the Notes of $100.0 million.
On December 22, 2006, the Company entered into a Master Shelf and Note Purchase Agreement (the “Master Agreement”) with a national insurance company (the “Purchaser”). On September 30, 2009, the Company and the Purchaser amended the Master Agreement to extend the term of the agreement until August 20, 2012. The Purchaser also purchased Notes issued by the Company in 2004. The Master Agreement provides for a $200.0 million private uncommitted “shelf” facility for the issuance of senior unsecured notes over a three-year period, with interest rates that may be fixed or floating and with such maturity dates, not to exceed ten years, as the parties may determine. The Master Agreement includes various covenants, limitations and events of default similar to the Notes issued in 2004. The initial issuance of notes under the Master Agreement occurred on December 22, 2006, through the issuance of $25.0 million in Series C Senior Notes due December 22, 2016, with a fixed interest rate of 5.66% per year. On February 1, 2008, $25.0 million in Series D Senior Notes due January 15, 2015, with a fixed interest rate of 5.37% per year, were issued. On
September 15, 2011, and pursuant to a Confirmation of Acceptance, dated January 21, 2011 (the “Confirmation”), in connection with the Master Agreement, $100.0 million in Series E Senior Notes due September 15, 2018, with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% per year, were issued. The Series E Senior Notes were issued for the sole purpose of retiring the Series A Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there was an outstanding debt balance of $150.0 million attributable to notes issued under the provisions of the Master Agreement. The Master Agreement expired on September 30, 2012 and was not extended.
On January 9, 2012, the Company entered into: (1) an amended and restated revolving and term loan credit agreement (the “SunTrust Agreement”) with SunTrust Bank (“SunTrust”) that provides for (a) a $100.0 million term loan (the “SunTrust Term Loan”) and (b) a $50.0 million revolving line of credit (the “SunTrust Revolver”) and (2) a $50.0 million promissory note (the “JPM Note”) in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”), pursuant to a letter agreement executed by JP Morgan (together with the JPM Note, (the “JPM Agreement”) that provided for a $50.0 million uncommitted line of credit bridge facility (the “JPM Bridge Facility”). The SunTrust Term Loan, the SunTrust Revolver and the JPM Bridge Facility were each funded on January 9, 2012, and provided the financing for the Arrowhead acquisition. The SunTrust Agreement amended and restated the Prior Loan Agreement.
The maturity date for the Wells Fargo Revolver is December 31, 2016, at which time all outstanding principal and unpaid interest will be due. The Wells Fargo Revolver may be increased by up to $50.0 million (bringing the total available to $100.0 million). The calculation of interest and fees for the Wells Fargo Agreement is generally based on our funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio. Interest is charged at a rate equal to 1.00% to 1.40% above LIBOR or 1.00% below the Base Rate, each as more fully described in the
Wells Fargo Agreement. Fees include an up-front fee, an availability fee of 0.175% to 0.25%, and a letter of credit margin fee of 1.00% to 1.40%. The obligations under the Wells Fargo Revolver are unsecured and the Wells Fargo Agreement includes various covenants, limitations and events of default that are customary for similar facilities for similar borrowers. The Wells Fargo Revolver was drawn down in the amount of $30.0 million on July 1, 2013. There were no borrowings against the Wells Fargo Revolver as of December 31, 2013.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had approximately $121,000 and $79,000 of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, respectively.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized was $391,000 as of December 31, 2013 and $294,000 as of December 31, 2012. The Company does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months.
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Arrowhead General Insurance Agency Superholding Corp, is currently undergoing an Internal Revenue Service review of its federal corporate income tax filings for the tax years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and the short period ended January 9, 2012. The Company’s 2008 through 2011 State of Colorado tax returns are currently under audit. In addition the Company has been notified by the State of Oregon regarding audits of all Oregon state tax returns for the period 2009 through 2012. Additionally, the Company has been notified by the State of Michigan regarding a review and audit of state tax returns for the period 2009 through 2011.
At December 31, 2013, 5,549,882 shares had been granted under the PSP. As of December 31, 2013, 75,435 shares had not met the first condition for vesting, 2,295,852 shares had met the first condition of vesting and had been awarded, and 3,178,595 shares had satisfied both conditions of vesting and had been distributed to participants. Of the shares that have not vested as of December 31, 2013, the initial stock prices ranged from $4.25 to $25.68.
In 2010, 187,040 shares were granted under the SIP. This grant was conditioned upon the surrender of 187,040 shares previously granted under the PSP in 2009, which were accordingly treated as forfeited PSP shares. The vesting conditions of this grant were identical to those provided for in connection with the 2009 PSP grant; thus the target stock prices and the periods associated with satisfaction of the first and second conditions of vesting were unchanged. Additionally, grants totaling 5,205 shares were made in 2010 to Decus employees under the SIP sub-plan applicable to Decus.
In 2012, 814,545 shares were granted under the SIP, primarily related to the Arrowhead acquisition. As of December 31, 2012, no shares had met the first condition for vesting.
In 2013, 3,719,974 shares were granted under the SIP. Of the shares granted in 2013, 891,399 shares will vest upon the grantees’ completion of between three and seven years of service with the Company, and because grantees have the right to vote the shares and receive dividends immediately after the date of grant these shares are considered awarded and outstanding under the two-class method. As of December 31, 2013, no shares had met the first condition for vesting.
Additionally, non-employee members of the Board of Directors received shares annually issued pursuant to the SIP as part of their annual compensation. A total of 36,919 SIP shares were issued to these directors in 2011 and 2012, of which 11,682 were issued in January 2011, 12,627 in January 2012, and 12,610 in December 2012. The shares issued in December 2012 were issued at that earlier time rather than in January 2013 pursuant to action of the Board of Directors. No additional shares were granted or issued to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors in 2013.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options on the grant date. The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve on the date of grant with a remaining term approximating the expected term of the option granted. The expected term of the options granted is derived from historical data; grantees are divided into two groups based upon expected exercise behavior and are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the period of time equivalent to the expected term of the options granted. The dividend yield is based upon the Company’s best estimate of future dividend yield.
A summary of stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2013:
The total intrinsic value of options exercised, determined as of the date of exercise, during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $1,558,000, $5,780,000 and $333,000, respectively. The total intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of all underlying awards and the quoted market price of the Company’s stock for all in-the-money stock options at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The non-cash stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
As of December 31, 2013, there was approximately $133.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to all non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 6.9 years.
Brown & Brown leases facilities and certain items of office equipment under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements expiring on various dates through 2042. The facility leases generally contain renewal options and escalation clauses based upon increases in the lessors’ operating expenses and other charges. Brown & Brown anticipates that most of these leases will be renewed or replaced upon expiration. At December 31, 2013, the aggregate future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable lease agreements were as follows:
Rental expense in 2013, 2012 and 2011 for operating leases totaled $42,992,000, $39,810,000, and $34,951,000, respectively.
The Company records losses for claims in excess of the limits of, or outside the coverage of, applicable insurance at the time and to the extent they are probable and estimable. In accordance with ASC Topic 450-Contingencies, the Company accrues anticipated costs of settlement, damages, losses for liability claims and, under certain conditions, costs of defense, based on historical experience or to the extent specific losses are probable and estimable. Otherwise, the Company expenses these costs as incurred. If the best estimate of a probable loss is a range rather than a specific amount, the Company accrues the amount at the lower end of the range.
The Company’s accruals for legal matters that were probable and estimable were not material at December 31, 2013 and 2012. We continue to assess certain litigation and claims to determine the amounts, if any, that management believes will be paid as a result of such claims and litigation and, therefore, additional losses may be accrued and paid in the future, which could adversely impact the Company’s operating results, cash flows and overall liquidity. The Company maintains third-party insurance policies to provide coverage for certain legal claims, in an effort to mitigate its overall exposure to unanticipated claims or adverse decisions. However, as (i) one or more of the Company’s insurance carriers could take the position that portions of these claims are not covered by the Company’s insurance, (ii) to the extent that payments are made to resolve claims and lawsuits, applicable insurance policy limits are eroded and (iii) the claims and lawsuits relating to these matters are continuing to develop, it is possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by unfavorable resolutions of these matters. Based on the A. M. Best ratings of these third-party insurers, management does not believe there is a substantial risk of an insurer’s material nonperformance related to any current insured claims.
On the basis of current information, the availability of insurance and legal advice, in management’s opinion, the Company is not currently involved in any legal proceedings which, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, operations and/or cash flows.
Under the Agreement, the merger is subject to certain closing conditions including the receipt of required regulatory approvals for the transaction (including the approval of antitrust authorities necessary to complete the acquisition). If the merger is not closed by July 15, 2014 (which may potentially be extended to October 15, 2014 if the only then-outstanding conditions are obtaining regulatory approvals), either party may terminate the agreement.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company and our report dated February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
The management of Brown & Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Brown & Brown”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including Brown & Brown’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, Brown & Brown conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.