We lease a total of 36 facilities, including 21 medical clinics in California. We own a 32,000 square-foot office building in Long Beach, California, which serves as our corporate headquarters.
We derived the following selected consolidated financial data for the five years ended December 31, 2004 from our audited consolidated financial statements. You should read the data in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included herein. All dollars are in thousands, except per share data.
(3) Salary, general and administrative expense ratio represents such expenses as a percentage of total operating revenue.
The following table details member months (defined as the aggregation of each month’s membership for the period) by state for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002:
Our operating expenses include expenses related to the provision of medical care services and salary, general and administrative, or SG&A, costs. Our results of operations depend on our ability to effectively manage expenses related to health benefits and accurately predict costs incurred.
SG&A costs are largely comprised of wage and benefit costs related to our employee base and other administrative expenses. Some SG&A services are provided locally, while others are delivered to our health plans from a centralized location. The major centralized functions are claims processing, information systems, finance and accounting services, and legal and regulatory services. Locally-provided functions include marketing (to the extent permitted by law and regulation), plan administration, and provider relations. Included in SG&A expenses are premium taxes for the Washington HMO, the Michigan HMO (beginning in the second quarter of 2003), and the New Mexico HMO (beginning with its acquisition on July 1, 2004).
Membership growth contributed $253.1 million to the increase in revenue. Year-end enrollment increased 39.7% to 788,000 members at December 31, 2004, from 564,000 members at the same date of the prior year. Member months for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased by 27.7% to 8,079,000 from 6,327,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. Year-end enrollment increased by 43.7% at our Washington HMO and by 92.7% at our Michigan HMO between 2003 and 2004. The transfer of membership from other managed care companies was the primary source of enrollment growth in both states. Our New Mexico acquisition (effective July 1, 2004) added 65,000 members to our total year-end 2004 enrollment
SG&A expenses for 2004 were $94.2 million as compared with $61.5 million for 2003. The largest component of the increase in SG&A was an increase in premium tax expense of $15.1 million in 2004. SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 8.0% for 2004 as compared with 7.8% for 2003. Excluding premium taxes, SG&A expenses decreased to 5.9% of total revenue for 2004 from 6.6% of total revenue for 2003.
Interest expense decreased to $1.0 million for 2004 from $1.5 million for the 2003 due to decreased debt balances.
Income tax expense totaled $31.9 million in 2004, resulting in an effective tax rate of 36.4%, as compared to $23.9 million in 2003, resulting in an effective tax rate of 36.0%. During both 2004 and 2003, we pursued
Other operating revenue decreased to $2.2 million for 2003 from $2.9 million for 2002. The decrease was the result of reduced savings sharing revenue at our California and Michigan HMOs.
Investment income for 2003 decreased to $1.8 million from $2.0 million for 2002 due to lower investment yields, which were partially offset by greater invested balances.
SG&A expenses for 2003 were $61.5 million as compared with $53.4 million (after deducting $7.8 million in stock option settlement expenses) for 2002. The increase was primarily due to an increase in premium tax expense of $4.2 million in 2003. SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 7.8% for 2003 as compared with 8.3% (adjusted for the stock option settlement expense) for 2002.
Depreciation and amortization expense for 2003 increased to $6.3 million from $4.1 million for 2002. The increase was primarily due to increased capital spending for computer equipment and leasehold improvements.
Interest expense increased to $1.5 million for 2003 from $.4 million for 2002. Interest expense increased due to the amortization of loan fee expense associated with our credit facility, as well as the payment of interest
on amounts borrowed under that facility. Interest expense was reduced by our repayment of a mortgage note in the second quarter of 2003.
Effective June 1, 2004, we completed our acquisition of the Healthy Options (Medicaid) and Basic Health Plan contracts of Premera Blue Cross, adding approximately 56,000 members. We paid to Premera $18 million for both contracts in addition to assuming an estimated $0.4 million in medical related liabilities. The transaction was funded with cash internally generated by our Washington HMO.
On July 1, 2004, we closed on our acquisition of Health Care Horizons, Inc., or HCH, the parent company of Cimarron Health Plan, Inc. (now Molina Healthcare of New Mexico, Inc.), a New Mexico corporation. Total consideration for the acquisition, including direct transaction costs was $71.8 million. At the close of the acquisition, we extinguished approximately $5.8 million of outstanding HCH bank debt. We funded the acquisition with proceeds from our initial and secondary public offerings.
Prior to the closing of the HCH acquisition, we announced a definitive agreement had been reached to transfer the commercial membership acquired in the HCH purchase to Lovelace Sandia Health System, Inc., or Lovelace. Effective August 1, 2004, the transfer was completed. We received a total of $18.0 million (net of approximately $0.3 million in direct transactions costs) in connection with the transfer. We also entered into a transition services agreement with Lovelace to provide commercial claims processing, customer and provider call handling, and billing and treasury services through the date the commercial contracts are expected to be fully transitioned to Lovelace.
On December 10, 2004, our California HMO, and Universal Care, Inc., a California corporation, entered into a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement to transfer Universal’s Medi-Cal and Healthy Families contracts to our California HMO. As of March 4, 2005, the proposed transfer had been approved by each of the California Department of Managed Health Care and the California Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board for a transfer effective as of June 1, 2005. The transaction would add approximately 17,000 members to our California HMO’s current membership. We anticipate paying approximately $6.2 million for the transfer of these contracts, subject to possible adjustment. As part of the transaction, Universal will assign the bulk of its provider network related to its Medi-Cal and Healthy Families members to our California HMO.
We generate cash from premium revenue, services provided on a fee-for-service basis at our clinics, and investment income. Our primary uses of cash include the payment of expenses related to medical care services, SG&A expenses and acquisitions. We generally receive premium revenue in advance of payment of claims for related health care services, with the exception of our Utah HMO.
In July 2003, we completed the initial public offering of our common stock. We sold 7,590,000 shares, generating net proceeds of approximately $119.6 million after deducting approximately $3.9 million in fees and expenses and $9.3 million in the underwriters’ discount. In March 2004, we completed a public offering of our common stock. We sold 1,800,000 shares, generating net proceeds of approximately $47.3 million after deducting approximately $0.6 million in fees and expenses and $2.5 million in the underwriters’ discount.
Our offerings of common stock in July 2003 and March 2004, respectively, have substantially enhanced our liquidity. Additionally, because we generally receive premium revenue in advance of payment for the related medical care costs (with the exception of our Utah HMO), our cash has increased during periods when we experienced enrollment growth. Our ability to support the increase in membership with existing infrastructure also allows us to retain a larger portion of the additional premium revenue as profit.
At December 31, 2004, we had working capital of $202.2 million as compared to $182.2 million at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, cash and cash equivalents were $228.1 million and $141.9 million, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, our investments were $88.5 million and $98.8 million, respectively.
Our subsidiaries are required to maintain minimum capital prescribed by the various jurisdictions in which we operate. As of December 31, 2004, all of our subsidiaries were in compliance with the minimum capital requirements. Barring any change in regulatory requirements, we believe that we will continue to be in compliance with these requirements at least through 2005. We also believe that our cash resources and internally generated funds will be sufficient to support our operations, regulatory requirements, and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months.
The average annualized portfolio yield for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 was approximately 1.4%, 1.1%, and 1.7%, respectively.
Net cash provided by operations was $91.0 million for 2004 and $45.6 million for 2003. The increase in net cash provided by operations for 2004 when compared to 2003 was due to the following factors:
increased medical claims and benefits payable (a source of $23.1 million in 2004 compared to a source of $14.7 million in 2003;
changes in accounts receivable balances, which were a use of $3.6 million in 2004 compared to a use of $24.1 million in 2003);
changes in miscellaneous working capital accounts (a source of $6.9 million in 2004 compared to a source of $6.0 million in 2003).
The terms of the credit agreement contain various covenants that place restrictions on our and/or our subsidiaries’ ability to incur debt, pay dividends, create liens, make investments, optionally repay, redeem or repurchase our securities, and enter into mergers, dispositions, and transactions with affiliates. The credit agreement also requires us to meet various financial covenants, including a minimum fixed-charge coverage requirement, a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, a minimum consolidated net worth requirement, a capital expenditure limit, and individual subsidiary risk based capital levels. At December 31, 2004, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.
At December 31, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under the credit facility.
We are currently in the process of amending and restating our credit facility to increase the maximum amount that can be borrowed under the facility to $180 million, and to make certain other revisions. We anticipate that this amendment and restatement will be completed in the first half of March 2005.
As of December 31, 2004, our HMOs had aggregate statutory capital and surplus of approximately $157.8 million, compared with the required minimum aggregate statutory capital and surplus of approximately $85.9 million. All of our HMOs were in compliance with the minimum capital requirements.
When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we use estimates and assumptions that may affect reported amounts and disclosures. The determination of our liability for claims and medical benefits payable is particularly important to the determination of our financial position and results of operations and requires the application of significant judgment by our management and, as a result, is subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty.
For the five months of service prior to the reporting date and earlier, we estimate our outstanding claims liability based upon actual claims paid, adjusted for estimated completion factors. Completion factors seek to
measure the cumulative percentage of claims expense that will have been paid for a given month of service as of a date subsequent to that month of service. Completion factors are based upon historical payment patterns. The following table reflects the change in our estimate of claims liability as of December 31, 2004 that would have resulted had we changed our completion factors for the fifth through the twelfth months preceding that date by the percentages indicated. Our Utah HMO is excluded from these calculations, as the majority of the Utah business is conducted under a cost reimbursement contract. Amounts are in thousands.
For the four months of service immediately prior to the reporting date, actual claims paid are not a reliable measure of our ultimate liability, given the delay inherent between the patient/physician encounter and the actual submission of a claim for payment. For these months of service we estimate our claims liability based upon trended per member per month cost estimates. These estimates reflect recent trends in payments and expense, utilization patterns, authorized services, and other relevant factors. The following table reflects the change in our estimate of claims liability as of December 31, 2004 that would have resulted had we altered our trend factors by the percentages indicated. Our Utah HMO is excluded from these calculations, as the majority of the Utah business is conducted under a cost reimbursement contract. Amounts are in thousands.
Assuming a hypothetical 1% change in both completion factors and per member per month cost estimates from those used in our calculation of IBNR at December 31, 2004, net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 would increase or decrease by approximately $1.1 million, or $.04 per diluted share, net of tax.
We lease office space and equipment under various operating leases. As of December 31, 2004, our lease obligations for the next five years and thereafter are as follows: $6.9 million in 2005, $6.6 million in 2006, $5.9 million in 2007, $5.6 million in 2008, $4.8 million in 2009, and an aggregate of $10.0 million thereafter.
We lease certain equipment at our New Mexico HMO under capital leases. As of December 31, 2004, our lease obligations for the next five years and thereafter are as follows: $0.2 million in 2005, $0.2 million in 2006, $0.2 million in 2007, $0.1 million in 2008, and none thereafter.
Contingencies” section of our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report and the notes thereto. We have in the past made certain advances and loans to related parties, which are discussed in the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report and the notes thereto.
All of our contracts are terminable for cause if we breach a material provision of the contract or violate relevant laws or regulations. Our contracts with the states are subject to cancellation by the state in the event of unavailability of state or federal funding. In some jurisdictions, such cancellation may be immediate and in other jurisdictions a notice period is required. In addition, most contracts are terminable without cause. Most contracts are for a specified period and are subject to non-renewal. Our other contracts are also eligible for termination or renewal through annual competitive bids. We may face increased competition as other plans attempt to enter our markets through the contracting process. If we are unable to renew, successfully rebid, or compete for any of our government contracts, or if any of our contracts are terminated, our business will suffer.
Our medical care costs include estimates of claims incurred but not reported. We, together with our independent actuaries, estimate our medical claims liabilities using actuarial methods based on historical data adjusted for payment patterns, cost trends, product mix, seasonality, utilization of health care services and other relevant factors. The estimation methods and the resulting reserves are continually reviewed and updated, and adjustments, if necessary, are reflected in the period known. While our estimates of claims incurred but not reported have been adequate in the past, they may be inadequate in the future, which would negatively affect our results of operations. Further, our inability to accurately estimate claims incurred but not reported may also affect our ability to take timely corrective actions, further exacerbating the extent of the negative impact on our results. If we estimate claims incurred but not reported too conservatively, our profits may be understated, which could result in inaccurate disclosure to the public in our periodic reports.
We are subject to extensive government regulation. Any changes to the laws and regulations governing our business, or the interpretation and enforcement of those laws or regulations, could cause us to modify our operations and could negatively impact our operating results.
For example, Congress enacted the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 which mandates that health plans enhance privacy protections for member protected health information. This requires health plans to add, at significant cost, new administrative, information, and security systems to prevent inappropriate release of protected member health information. The requirements for compliance with this law are uncertain and will continue to affect our profitability. The regulations enacting this law also establish significant criminal penalties and civil sanctions for non-compliance, including fines for violations of the regulations by our business associates. Individual states periodically consider adding operational requirements applicable to health plans, often without identifying funding for these requirements. California recently required all health plans to make available to members independent medical review of their claims. This requirement is costly to implement and could affect our profitability.
Our information systems and applications require continual maintenance, upgrading, and enhancement to meet our operational needs. Moreover, our acquisition activity requires transitions to or from, and the integration of, various information systems. We regularly upgrade and expand our information systems capabilities. If we experience difficulties with the transition to or from information systems or are unable to properly implement, maintain, or expand our system, we could suffer from, among other things, operational disruptions, loss of members, difficulty in attracting new members, regulatory problems, and increases in administrative expenses.
The acquisitions of Medicaid contract rights and other health plans have accounted for a significant amount of our growth. Although we cannot predict with certainty our rate of growth as the result of acquisitions, we believe that acquisitions similar in nature to those we have historically executed will be important to our future growth strategy. Many of the other potential purchasers of these assets have greater financial resources than we have. Also, many of the sellers may insist on selling assets that we do not want, such as commercial lines of business, or may insist on transferring their liabilities to us as part of the sale of their companies or assets. Even if we identify suitable targets, we may be unable to complete acquisitions on terms favorable to us or obtain the necessary financing for these acquisitions. Further, to the extent we complete an acquisition, we may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits from such acquisition because of operational factors or difficulty in integrating the acquisition with the existing business. This may include the integration of:
new provider networks, which may operate on terms different from our existing networks,
additional members, who may decide to transfer to other health care providers or health plans,
accounting policies, including those which require judgmental and complex estimation processes, such as estimates of claims incurred but not reported, accounting for goodwill, intangible assets, stock-based compensation, and income tax matters.
Ineffective management of our growth may negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition, and business.
Restrictions and covenants in our credit facility may limit our ability to make certain acquisitions and declare dividends.
Our operations are highly dependent on the efforts of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice Presidents, some of whom have entered into employment agreements with us. These employment
agreements may not provide sufficient incentives for those employees to continue their employment with us. While we believe that we could find replacements, the loss of their leadership, knowledge, and experience could negatively impact our operations. Replacing many of our executive officers might be difficult or take an extended period of time because a limited number of individuals in the managed care industry have the breadth and depth of skills and experience necessary to operate and expand successfully a business such as ours. Our success is also dependent on our ability to hire and retain qualified management, technical, and medical personnel. We may be unsuccessful in recruiting and retaining such personnel which could negatively impact our operations.
Our providers involved in medical care decisions may be exposed to the risk of medical malpractice claims. Providers at the primary care clinics we operate in California are employees of our California subsidiary. As a direct employer of physicians and ancillary medical personnel and as an operator of primary care clinics, our subsidiary may experience increased exposure to liability for acts or omissions by our employees and for acts or injuries occurring on our premises. We maintain errors and omissions insurance in the amount of $5 million per occurrence and in aggregate for each policy year, medical malpractice insurance for our clinics in the amount of $1 million per occurrence, and an annual aggregate limit of $3 million, and such other lines of coverage as we believe are reasonable in light of our experience to date. However, this insurance may not be sufficient or available at a reasonable cost to protect us from damage awards or other liabilities. Even if any claims brought against us were unsuccessful or without merit, we would have to defend ourselves against such claims. The defense of any such actions may be time-consuming and costly, and may distract our management’s attention. As a result, we may incur significant expenses and may be unable to effectively operate our business.
In addition, claimants often sue managed care organizations for improper denials or delay of care. Also, Congress, as well as several states, are considering legislation that would permit managed care organizations to be held liable for negligent treatment decisions or benefits coverage determinations. If this or similar legislation were enacted, claims of this nature could result in substantial damage awards against us and our providers that could exceed the limits of any applicable medical malpractice insurance coverage. Successful malpractice or tort claims asserted against us, our providers, or our employees could adversely affect our financial condition and profitability.
adverse publicity regarding health maintenance organizations and other managed care organizations,
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance or changes in financial estimates, if any, of public market analysts,
announcements relating to our business or the business of our competitors,
Our directors and officers and members of the Molina family own a majority of our capital stock, decreasing the influence of other stockholders on stockholder decisions.
Our executive officers and directors, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 22.4% of our capital stock. Members of the Molina family (some of whom are also officers or directors), in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 58.0% of our capital stock, either directly or in trusts of which members of the Molina family are beneficiaries. In some cases, members of the Molina family are trustees of the trusts. As a result, Molina family members, acting themselves or together with our officers and directors, will have the ability to significantly influence all matters submitted to stockholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors, amendments to our charter, and any merger, consolidation, or sale of substantially all of our assets. A significant concentration of share ownership can also adversely affect the trading price for our common stock because investors often discount the value of stock in companies that have controlling stockholders. Furthermore, the concentration of ownership in our company could delay, defer, or prevent a merger or consolidation, takeover, or other business combination that could be favorable to our stockholders. Finally, the interests and objectives of our controlling stockholders may be different from those of our company or our other stockholders, and our controlling stockholders may vote their common stock in a manner that may adversely affect our other stockholders.
It may be difficult for a third party to acquire our company, which could inhibit stockholders from realizing a premium on their stock price.
advance notice requirements for the submission by stockholders of nominations for election to the board of directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at a meeting.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Molina Healthcare, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
In certain instances, we have required providers to place funds on deposit with us as protection against their potential insolvency. These reserves are frequently in the form of segregated funds received from the provider and held by us or placed in a third-party financial institution. These funds may be used to pay claims that are the financial responsibility of the provider in the event the provider is unable to meet these obligations. Additionally, we have recorded liabilities for estimated losses arising from provider instability or insolvency in excess of provider funds on deposit with us.
The contractual maturities of our investments as of December 31, 2004 are summarized below.
Gross realized gains and gross realized losses from sales of available-for-sale securities are calculated under the specific identification method and are included in investment income. Net losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities in 2004 were $19. In 2003, net gains on sales of available-for -sale securities were $1.
Receivables consist primarily of amounts due from the various states in which we operate. All receivables are subject to potential retroactive adjustment by the various states in which we operate. As the amounts of all receivables are readily determinable and our creditors are state governments, our allowance for doubtful accounts is immaterial. Any amounts determined to be uncollectible are charged to expense when such determination is made. Accounts receivable by operating subsidiary are comprised of the following:
Substantially all receivables due our California HMO at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were collected in January of 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Our agreement with the state of Utah calls for the reimbursement of our Utah HMO of medical costs incurred in serving our members plus an administrative fee of 9% of medical costs and all or a portion of any cost savings realized, as defined in the agreement. Our Utah health plan bills the state of Utah monthly for actual paid health care claims plus administrative fees. Our receivable balance from the state of Utah includes: 1) amounts billed to the state for actual paid health care claims plus administrative fees; 2) amounts estimated to be due under the savings sharing provision of the agreement (Other Operating Revenue); and 3) amounts estimated for incurred but not reported claims, which, along with the related administrative fees, are not billable to the state of Utah until such claims are actually paid.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired. Identifiable intangible assets (consisting principally of purchased contract rights) are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period to be benefited. Effective January 1, 2002, we ceased amortization of goodwill in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Prior to that date, we amortized goodwill over periods not exceeding 15 years. We performed the required impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets in 2004, 2003 and 2002 and no impairment was identified in these periods.
Situations may arise where the carrying value of a long-lived asset may exceed the present value of the expected cash flows associated with that asset. In such circumstances the asset is said to be impaired. We review material long-lived assets for impairment on an annual basis, as well as when events or changes in business conditions suggest potential impairment. Impaired assets are written down to fair value. We have determined that no long-lived assets are impaired at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce future income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
We carry medical malpractice insurance for health care services rendered through our clinics in California. Through December 31, 2003, claims-made coverage under this insurance was $5,000 per occurrence with an annual aggregate limit of $10,000. Subsequent to December 31, 2003, claims-made coverage under this insurance is $1,000 per occurrence with an annual aggregate limit of $3,000. We also carry claims-made managed care professional liability insurance for our HMO operations. This insurance is subject to a coverage limit of $5,000 per occurrence and in aggregate for each policy year.
At December 31, 2004, we had two stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 11. We account for the plans under the recognition and measurement principles (the intrinsic-value method) prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Compensation cost for stock options is reflected in net income and is measured as the excess of the market price of our stock at the date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. We have adopted the disclosure provisions required by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.
The following table illustrates the components of our stock-based compensation expense (net of tax) as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income:
The recognition and measurement of stock grants is the same under APB Opinion No. 25 and SFAS No. 123. The related expenses for the fair value of stock grants were charged to salary, general and administrative expenses and are included in the net income, as reported amounts in the pro forma net income table above.
We currently expect to adopt SFAS 123R effective July 1, 2005; however, we have not yet determined which of the aforementioned adoption methods we will use. Subject to a complete review of the requirements of SFAS 123R, based on stock options granted to employees through December 31, 2004, as well as stock options expected to be granted and shares expected to be issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan during 2005, we expect that the adoption of SFAS 123R on July 1, 2005, would reduce both third quarter 2005 and fourth quarter 2005 net earnings by approximately $436 ($0.02 per diluted share) each. See Note 12 for further information on our stock-based compensation plans.
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, receivables and restricted investments.
Restricted investments are invested principally in certificates of deposit and treasury securities.
Our consolidated balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, investments, receivables, trade accounts payable, medical claims and benefits payable, notes payable and other liabilities. The carrying amounts of current assets and liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization. The carrying value of advances to related parties and all long-term obligations approximates their fair value based on borrowing rates currently available to the company for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Medicaid and similar members in return for compensation from state agencies. They share similar characteristics in the membership they serve, the nature of services provided and the method by which medical care is rendered. The subsidiaries are also subject to similar regulatory environment and long-term economic prospects. As such, we have one reportable segment.
Prior to the closing of the HCH acquisition, we announced a definitive agreement had been reached to transfer the commercial membership acquired in the HCH purchase to Lovelace Sandia Health System, Inc. (“Lovelace”). Effective August 1, 2004, the transfer was completed. We received a total of $17,994 (net of approximately $265 in direct transactions costs) in connection with the transfer. We also entered into a transition services agreement with Lovelace to provide commercial claims processing, customer and provider call handling, and billing and treasury services through the date the commercial contracts are expected to be fully transitioned to Lovelace.
The HCH purchase has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the consideration paid has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess of such consideration paid over the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities has been allocated to certain identifiable intangible assets (included in the table below) and goodwill. The goodwill has been reduced by the consideration received for the commercial membership assets transferred to Lovelace, and further adjusted for the net cash inflows of the commercial operations for the one-month period ended July 31, 2004, or $260, the estimated cash outflows of the transition services agreement and other actions taken in connection with the termination of the commercial line of business, or $2,900, and a tax liability resulting from a gain on transfer of $5,279.
The following is an analysis of goodwill and intangible assets recognized in connection with the HCH transactions:
The following summarizes our preliminary estimate of net assets acquired at the date of acquisition (includes effect of the Lovelace divestiture transaction):
Molina Siblings Trust for $1,850. Rental expense for these leases totaled $367, $383, and $390 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. At December 31, 2004, minimum future lease payments for the two remaining leased clinics amount to $23 in 2005 and nothing thereafter.
On March 2, 2004, the Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Insurance Agreements were terminated when the Molina Siblings Trust repaid to us the advances. Upon such termination, we recognized a pretax gain of $1,161. The gain of $1,161 represented the recovery of the discounts previously recorded and was recorded as Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
We received technology services from companies owned by non-employee members of the Molina family during 2002. Such services received during the year ended December 31, 2002 totaled $86.
In December 2004, we issued a mortgage note in the amount of $1,302 in connection with the purchase of a medical clinic from a related party (see Note 5. Related Party Transactions). The note bears a variable interest rate of LIBOR (six month London Interbank Offered Rates) added to a margin of 2.75% subject to change no more often than monthly; the initial interest rate applicable to the first payment is 5.5%. The terms of the note specify 119 regular equal payments of $7 per month and one irregular last payment. The first payment is due February 1, 2005, with the final payment on January 1, 2015. Principal payment obligations under this mortgage note are:
maximum allowed by law. We match up to the first 4% of compensation contributed by employees. Expense recognized in connection with our contributions to the 401(k) plan totaled $1,387, $1,120, and $1,007 in the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
The health care industry is subject to numerous laws and regulations of federal, state, and local governments. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be subject to government review and interpretation, as well as regulatory actions unknown and unasserted at this time. Penalties associated with violations of these laws and regulations include significant fines and penalties, exclusion from participating in publicly-funded programs, and the repayment of previously billed and collected revenues. Additionally, many of our medical contracts are complex in nature and may be subject to differing interpretations regarding amounts due for the provision of various services. Such differing interpretations may lead to disputes with medical providers which may seek additional monetary compensation.
In July 2004, our California HMO received a demand for arbitration from USC/Tenet Hospital (“Tenet”) seeking damages of approximately $4,500 involving certain disputed medical claims. In September 2004, Tenet amended its demand to join additional Tenet hospital claimants and to increase its damage claim to approximately $8,000. To date no significant discovery has taken place. We believe that the California HMO has meritorious defenses to Tenet’s claims and the California HMO intends to vigorously defend this matter. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of this matter will materially affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
On November 7, 2002, we agreed to acquire fully vested stock options to purchase 640,000 shares of common stock and the related Put Option held by an executive through a cash payment of $7,660. The cash payment was determined based on the negotiated fair value per share in excess of the exercise price of the 640,000 shares as if the options were exercised and the shares repurchased. The cash settlement resulted in a compensation charge of $6,880 in the fourth quarter of 2002.
based on the negotiated fair value per share in excess of exercise price of the 95,200 shares as if the options were exercised and the shares repurchased. The cash settlement resulted in a 2002 fourth quarter compensation charge of $916.
Our principal operations are conducted through our HMO subsidiaries operating in California, Washington, Michigan, New Mexico, and Utah. Our HMOs are subject to state regulations that, among other things, require the maintenance of minimum levels of statutory capital, as defined by each state, and restrict the timing, payment and amount of dividends and other distributions that may be paid to us as the sole stockholder. To the extent the subsidiaries must comply with these regulations, they may not have the financial flexibility to transfer funds to us. The net assets in these subsidiaries (after intercompany eliminations), which may not be transferable to us in the form of loans, advances or cash dividends was $130,000 at December 31, 2004 and $72,000 at December 31, 2003. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC, adopted rules effective December 31, 1998, which, if implemented by the states, set new minimum capitalization requirements for insurance companies, HMOs and other entities bearing risk for health care coverage. The requirements take the form of risk-based capital (RBC) rules. Washington, Michigan, New Mexico, and Utah have adopted these rules, which may vary from state to state. California has not yet adopted NAIC risk-based capital requirements for HMOs and has not formally given notice of its intention to do so. Such requirements, if adopted by California, may increase the minimum capital required for that state.
Our stockholders voted on July 31, 2002, to approve a re-incorporation merger whereby our company merged with and reincorporated into a newly formed Delaware corporation as the surviving corporation. The re-incorporation merger took effect on June 26, 2003, and these financial statements reflect the effect of a 40-for-1 split of our outstanding common stock as a result of the share exchange in the re-incorporation merger.
Our Certificate of Incorporation provides for 80,000,000 shares of authorized common stock, par value $0.001 and 20,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock, par value $0.001. Our board of directors may designate the rights, preferences, and privileges of each series of preferred stock at a future date. Such rights, preferences, and privileges may include dividend and liquidation preferences and redemption and voting rights.
In 2002, we adopted the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (2002 Plan), which provides for the granting of stock options, restricted stock, performance shares, and stock bonus awards to the company’s officers, employees, directors, consultants, advisors, and other service providers. The 2002 Plan was effective upon the effectiveness of our initial public offering of common stock in July of 2003. The 2002 Plan originally allowed for the issuance of 1,600,000 shares of common stock, of which up to 600,000 shares may be issued as restricted stock. Beginning January 1, 2004, and each year thereafter, shares eligible for issuance will automatically increase by the lesser of 400,000 shares or 2% of total outstanding capital stock on a fully diluted basis, unless the board of directors provides for a smaller increase. Awards were first made under the 2002 Plan during 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we issued options to purchase 302,200 shares (of which 5,100 were subsequently
forfeited) at an estimated fair value of $3,960. Also during the year ended December 31, 2004, we awarded stock grants for 51,000 shares with a fair value at the date of grant of $1,908, recognizing $179 in compensation expense.
In July 2002, we adopted the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Purchase Plan) which provides for the issuance of up to 600,000 common shares. The Purchase Plan was effective upon the effectiveness of our initial public offering of common stock in July of 2003. Beginning January 1, 2004, and each year thereafter, shares eligible for issuance will automatically increase by the lesser of 6,000 shares or 1% of total outstanding capital stock on a fully diluted basis. During each six-month offering period, eligible employees may purchase common shares at 85% of their fair market value through payroll deductions. Each eligible employee is limited to a maximum purchase of $25 (as measured by the fair value of the stock acquired) per year. During the year ended December 31, 2004, 37,050 shares were issued pursuant to the Purchase Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2003, 80,130 shares were issued pursuant to the Purchase Plan.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, we made stocks grants comprising 51,000 shares of common stock as employee compensation. Restrictions on these shares will expire and related charges are being amortized as earned over the vesting period of up to three years. We issued 390,608 and 25,400 common shares during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, pursuant to the exercise of stock options. No common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options during 2002.
Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share, as presented in Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies,” is required by SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, and has been determined as if we had accounted for our employee stock options under the fair value method of that Statement upon its initial effective date. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a minimum value option-pricing model for grants made prior to our initial public offering in July 2003 and a Black-Scholes option-pricing model for grants made subsequent to our initial public offering with the following weighted-average assumptions: a risk-free interest rate of 4.15% in 2004 and 3.78% in 2003; expected stock process volatility of 51.2% in 2004 (volatility is not applicable in 2003 as no grants were made that were subject to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model); dividend yield of 0% and expected option lives of 60 months. Assumptions for 2002 were not provided since no options were granted.
In March 2004, we completed a public offering of our common stock. We sold 1,800,000 shares, generating net proceeds of approximately $47,282 after deducting approximately $600 in fees, costs and expenses and $2,520 in the underwriters’ discount.
In July 2003, we completed an initial public offering of our common stock. We sold 7,590,000 shares, generating net proceeds of approximately $119,600 after deducting approximately $3,900 in fees, costs and expenses and $9,300 in underwriters’ discount.
The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
The Registrant and its subsidiaries are included in the consolidated federal and state income tax returns filed by the Registrant. Income taxes are allocated to each subsidiary in accordance with an intercompany tax allocation agreement. The agreement allocates income taxes in an amount generally equivalent to the amount which would be expensed by the subsidiary if it filed a separate tax return. NOL benefits are paid to the subsidiary by the Registrant to the extent such losses are utilized in the consolidated tax returns.
In December 2004 we issued a mortgage note in the amount of $1,302 in connection with the purchase of a medical clinic from a related party, the Molina Siblings Trust. This facility also serves as our backup data center. Total purchase price for the facility was $1,850.