fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
__________________ test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references ___________________

    @pytest.mark.skipif(not hasattr(sys, "getrefcount"), reason="PyPy")
    def test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references():
        surface = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
        v = memoryview(b"bla")
        x = v[:1]
        recfcount_v = sys.getrefcount(v)
        recfcount_x = sys.getrefcount(x)
        assert recfcount_v == recfcount_x
>       surface.set_mime_data("foo", v)
E       SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function

tests/test_api.py:282: SystemError
________________________ test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf ________________________

    @pytest.mark.skipif(
        sysconfig.get_platform().startswith("win"), reason="msvc fixme")
    def test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf():
        jpeg_bytes = zlib.decompress(base64.b64decode(
            b'eJz7f+P/AwYBLzdPNwZGRkYGDyBk+H+bwRnEowj8P8TAzcHACDJHkOH/EQYRIBsV'
            b'cP6/xcDBCBJlrLcHqRBAV8EAVcHIylSPVwGbPQEFjPaK9XDrBAipBSq4CQB9jiS0'
        ))

        file_like = io.BytesIO()
        surface = cairo.PDFSurface(file_like, 3, 3)
        context = cairo.Context(surface)
        image = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
>       image.set_mime_data(cairo.MIME_TYPE_JPEG, jpeg_bytes)
E       SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function

tests/test_api.py:308: SystemError
________________________ test_surface_get_set_mime_data ________________________

    def test_surface_get_set_mime_data():
        surface = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
        assert surface.get_mime_data("foo") is None
        assert surface.get_mime_data(cairo.MIME_TYPE_JPEG) is None

>       surface.set_mime_data("foo", b"bar")
E       SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function

tests/test_surface.py:478: SystemError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references - SystemE...
FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf - SystemError: /buil...
FAILED tests/test_surface.py::test_surface_get_set_mime_data - SystemError: /...
=================== 3 failed, 268 passed, 3 skipped in 0.82s ===================

Answer: it contains traceback from the Python test failures which lead to the failed build
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3/rdppm.c:427: undefined reference to `MAX'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
]: [Shows error from linker that caused the build failure]
=============
[rdppm.c: In function 'start_input_ppm':
rdppm.c:427:51: warning: implicit declaration of function 'MAX' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                                   (size_t)(((long)MAX(maxval, 255) + 1L) *
                                                   ^~~
]: [This is cause of the error - warning shows that function/macro used here is not defined]


Answer: Issue: Build failed because linker was not able to find required symbol. In this case its missing definition of MAX macro
Resolution: Add definition of required macro, either manually define it or include some header file that contains the definition.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3/rdppm.c:427: undefined reference to `MAX'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status


Answer: Shows error from linker that caused the build failure
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
rdppm.c: In function 'start_input_ppm':
rdppm.c:427:51: warning: implicit declaration of function 'MAX' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                                   (size_t)(((long)MAX(maxval, 255) + 1L) *
                                                   ^~~


Answer: This is cause of the error - warning shows that function/macro used here is not defined
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [checking for GNU M4 that supports accurate traces... configure: error: no acceptable m4 could be found in $PATH.]: [Check for acceptable GNU M4 macro processor has failed. This is a problem since M4 is used by autoconf.]
=============
[GNU M4 1.4.6 or later is required; 1.4.16 or newer is recommended.
GNU M4 1.4.15 uses a buggy replacement strstr on some systems.
Glibc 2.9 - 2.12 and GNU M4 1.4.11 - 1.4.15 have another strstr bug]: [Reasons are given for why various M4 versions are not acceptable.]


Answer: Issue: The M4 macro processor was present, but the version 1.4.13 is among those considered not acceptable.
Resolution: Ensure that acceptable version of M4 macro processor is present on the build system. Verify dependencies of the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
checking for GNU M4 that supports accurate traces... configure: error: no acceptable m4 could be found in $PATH.

Answer: Check for acceptable GNU M4 macro processor has failed. This is a problem since M4 is used by autoconf.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
GNU M4 1.4.6 or later is required; 1.4.16 or newer is recommended.
GNU M4 1.4.15 uses a buggy replacement strstr on some systems.
Glibc 2.9 - 2.12 and GNU M4 1.4.11 - 1.4.15 have another strstr bug

Answer: Reasons are given for why various M4 versions are not acceptable.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/make -s 'HOSTCFLAGS=-O2  -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=z14 -mtune=z15 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection ' 'HOSTLDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed   -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes ' ARCH=s390 KCFLAGS= WITH_GCOV=0 -j16 modules
In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:22,
                 from ./include/kunit/test.h:24,
                 from mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:10:
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:36:18: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING’
   36 | MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING);
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:26:61: note: in definition of macro ‘__MODULE_INFO’
   26 |                 = __MODULE_INFO_PREFIX __stringify(tag) "=" info
      |                                                             ^~~~
./include/linux/module.h:299:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘MODULE_INFO’
  299 | #define MODULE_IMPORT_NS(ns)    MODULE_INFO(import_ns, ns)
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:36:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘MODULE_IMPORT_NS’
   36 | MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING);
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: mm/kasan] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: mm] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-6.12.0-78.el10/linux-6.12.0-78.el10.s390x/Makefile:1984: .] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:236: __sub-make] Error 2
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GiGHcq (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GiGHcq (%build)]: [This snippet has a compilation failure of the kernel.]


Answer: Issue: The mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c has a syntax error because the EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING should be covered by double quotes.
Resolution: To fix this issue, you need to fix the syntax error by putting EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING under double quotes.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/make -s 'HOSTCFLAGS=-O2  -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=z14 -mtune=z15 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection ' 'HOSTLDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed   -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes ' ARCH=s390 KCFLAGS= WITH_GCOV=0 -j16 modules
In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:22,
                 from ./include/kunit/test.h:24,
                 from mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:10:
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:36:18: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING’
   36 | MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING);
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:26:61: note: in definition of macro ‘__MODULE_INFO’
   26 |                 = __MODULE_INFO_PREFIX __stringify(tag) "=" info
      |                                                             ^~~~
./include/linux/module.h:299:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘MODULE_INFO’
  299 | #define MODULE_IMPORT_NS(ns)    MODULE_INFO(import_ns, ns)
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:36:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘MODULE_IMPORT_NS’
   36 | MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING);
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: mm/kasan] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: mm] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-6.12.0-78.el10/linux-6.12.0-78.el10.s390x/Makefile:1984: .] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:236: __sub-make] Error 2
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GiGHcq (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GiGHcq (%build)

Answer: This snippet has a compilation failure of the kernel.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [            ipython_config = profile_dir / "ipython_config.py"
&gt;           assert Path(ipython_config).exists()
E           AssertionError: assert False
E            +  where False = exists()
E            +    where exists = PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py').exists
E            +      where PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py') = Path(PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py'))
core/tests/test_profile.py:161: AssertionError]: [The assertion failed when trying to assert that the ipython_config.py file exists]


Answer: Issue: The assertion that the ipython_config.py file exists failed, it may be missing, named incorrectly or located in a wrong place.
Resolution: Ensure the ipython_config.py file exists, is named correctly and is located in the expected directory.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
            ipython_config = profile_dir / "ipython_config.py"
&gt;           assert Path(ipython_config).exists()
E           AssertionError: assert False
E            +  where False = exists()
E            +    where exists = PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py').exists
E            +      where PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py') = Path(PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py'))
core/tests/test_profile.py:161: AssertionError

Answer: The assertion failed when trying to assert that the ipython_config.py file exists
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kn1qkC (%check)
]: [The build failed in %check section.]
=============
[>                   raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename)
E                   FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'git'
/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py:1966: FileNotFoundError
]: [The command "git" could not be found.]


Answer: Issue: The test suite needs to run `git` command, but the package that provides this command is not installed.
Resolution: You need to add BuildRequires with package that provides this command.

In this case:

```
$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/git
git-core-2.47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
```

You should add to SPEC file:

BuildRequires: git-core
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kn1qkC (%check)


Answer: The build failed in %check section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
>                   raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename)
E                   FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'git'
/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py:1966: FileNotFoundError


Answer: The command "git" could not be found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: building at STEP "RUN rm -rf /etc/my.cnf.d/* &&     /usr/libexec/container-setup &&     rpm-file-permissions &&     /usr/libexec/mysqld -V | grep -qe "{$MYSQL_VERSION}\." && echo "Found VERSION ${MYSQL_VERSION}"": while running runtime: exit status 1
]: [Container build error, showing the precise command that failed]
=============
[{$MYSQL_VERSION}]: [The error - typo in BASH variable
The code contains: {$MYSQL_VERSION}
But it should be: ${MYSQL_VERSION}]


Answer: Issue: The error - typo in BASH variable
The code contains: {$MYSQL_VERSION}
But it should be: ${MYSQL_VERSION}
Resolution: Fix the BASH variable
The code contains: {$MYSQL_VERSION}
But it should be: ${MYSQL_VERSION}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: building at STEP "RUN rm -rf /etc/my.cnf.d/* &&     /usr/libexec/container-setup &&     rpm-file-permissions &&     /usr/libexec/mysqld -V | grep -qe "{$MYSQL_VERSION}\." && echo "Found VERSION ${MYSQL_VERSION}"": while running runtime: exit status 1


Answer: Container build error, showing the precise command that failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
{$MYSQL_VERSION}

Answer: The error - typo in BASH variable
The code contains: {$MYSQL_VERSION}
But it should be: ${MYSQL_VERSION}
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [src/user.c:145:54: error: passing argument 2 of âload_entryâ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  145 |                                 e = load_entry(file, log_error, pw, envp);
      |                                                      ^~~~~~~~~
      |                                                      |
      |                                                      void (*)(const char *)
src/funcs.h:92:37: note: expected âvoid (*)(void)â but argument is of type âvoid (*)(const char *)â
   92 | entry           *load_entry(FILE *, void (*)(), struct passwd *, char **);
      |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~
make[1]: *** [Makefile:747: src/user.o] Error 1]: [The error message indicates a type mismatch in the load_entry function call. This function expects a pointer to a function that takes no arguments (void pointer), but you're providing a pointer to a function that takes a const char * argument (a pointer to a constant character string).]


Answer: Issue: The build failure is primarily due to the use of deprecated security_context_t functions. This indicates that the cronie package is attempting to use older SELinux APIs that are no longer recommended.
Resolution: Additional Considerations

Security Implications: Using deprecated APIs can introduce security vulnerabilities. It's essential to assess the risks associated with the specific use case and take appropriate measures to mitigate them.
SELinux Configuration: Ensure that your SELinux policy is configured correctly to allow the necessary permissions for the cronie service. Incorrect SELinux policies can lead to unexpected behavior and security issues.
Build Environment Consistency: Verify that your build environment is configured correctly and that all necessary dependencies are installed. Inconsistent build environments can cause unexpected build failures.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
src/user.c:145:54: error: passing argument 2 of âload_entryâ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  145 |                                 e = load_entry(file, log_error, pw, envp);
      |                                                      ^~~~~~~~~
      |                                                      |
      |                                                      void (*)(const char *)
src/funcs.h:92:37: note: expected âvoid (*)(void)â but argument is of type âvoid (*)(const char *)â
   92 | entry           *load_entry(FILE *, void (*)(), struct passwd *, char **);
      |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~
make[1]: *** [Makefile:747: src/user.o] Error 1

Answer: The error message indicates a type mismatch in the load_entry function call. This function expects a pointer to a function that takes no arguments (void pointer), but you're providing a pointer to a function that takes a const char * argument (a pointer to a constant character string).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [308:41.93 /usr/bin/ld: ../../../aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/libgkrust.a(gkrust-45ab92441dac2f20.gkrust.25dc58529403c021-cgu.0.rcgu.o): unrecognized relocation type 0x13b in section `.rodata..Lswitch.table._ZN14neqo_transport10connection10Connection10input_path17h954f74b0f4b6b6f4E.12427.rel'
308:42.00 /usr/bin/ld: is this version of the linker - version 2.41-56.el10 - out of date ?
308:42.00 /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value]: [This is the error causing the build to fail.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because of a bug (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141737) in llvm.
Resolution: Update llvm to version >= 20.1.7.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
308:41.93 /usr/bin/ld: ../../../aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/libgkrust.a(gkrust-45ab92441dac2f20.gkrust.25dc58529403c021-cgu.0.rcgu.o): unrecognized relocation type 0x13b in section `.rodata..Lswitch.table._ZN14neqo_transport10connection10Connection10input_path17h954f74b0f4b6b6f4E.12427.rel'
308:42.00 /usr/bin/ld: is this version of the linker - version 2.41-56.el10 - out of date ?
308:42.00 /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value

Answer: This is the error causing the build to fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:]: [The error type]
=============
[No match for argument: python3-mrtparse]: [The name of the missing package]


Answer: Issue: A package is missing in Fedora to build this one.
Resolution: You need to package the missing dependency first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:

Answer: The error type
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3-mrtparse

Answer: The name of the missing package
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: gimp-devel-tools
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(gimp-3.0) >= 3.0]: [This lists packages (build dependencies) which couldn't be installed]


Answer: Issue: Some packages which are build dependencies couldn't be installed, and therefore the source code couldn't be built.
Resolution: Look at the listed packages (in this case gimp-devel-tools and any packages that matches "pkgconfig(gimp-3.0) >= 3.0") and figure out why they can't be installed. They might be missing in the repository (perhaps just for some specific architecture). Or there can be a network failure which caused some repository to be unavailable. If this is not a temporary issue, you either need to drop the build dependencies (if the source code can be built without them), replace them with a compatible library (if available), or add the missing dependencies to the repository.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: gimp-devel-tools
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(gimp-3.0) >= 3.0

Answer: This lists packages (build dependencies) which couldn't be installed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)
]: [The part "(python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)" specifies a very specific version range for the setuptools package. It requires a version that is at least 70.0.0 but strictly less than 70.1.0.]


Answer: Issue: The error message you're seeing, "nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)," indicates a dependency conflict within your Python project. Therefore the RPM build failed as the build requires can't be satisfied.
Resolution: Update the dependency constraint to the one available in the distribution and make sure the software works well with it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)


Answer: The part "(python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)" specifies a very specific version range for the setuptools package. It requires a version that is at least 70.0.0 but strictly less than 70.1.0.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
pyproject_save_files: invalid option -- ']: [Option 'l' isn't valid.]
=============
[
error: /builddir/build/originals/python-hatchling.spec: line 49: Unknown option l in pyproject_save_files]: [Spec file contains error on line 49 in pyproject_save_files()]


Answer: Issue: Spec file or other build file contains errors.
Resolution: Inspect 'pyproject_save_files' and invalid option 'l'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

pyproject_save_files: invalid option -- '

Answer: Option 'l' isn't valid.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

error: /builddir/build/originals/python-hatchling.spec: line 49: Unknown option l in pyproject_save_files

Answer: Spec file contains error on line 49 in pyproject_save_files()
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
meson.build:91:19: ERROR: Subproject exists but has no meson.build file.
]: [This is the actual error.]


Answer: Issue: A git snapshot tarball (such as those automatically generated by the popular git forges) was used as the sources, but the git repository from which it was taken contains git submodules.  The content of git submodules are not included in such snapshot tarballs, but the build system expects them to be present, and hence the build fails.
Resolution: git submodules are usually used for bundled dependencies.  If a system version of the dependency can be used instead, it may be preferred to do so, by adding the respective build dependency to the build.  If not, then a complete tarball which includes the contents of the git submodules must be used.  This may be available from upstream as a download, or it may need to be manually generated by the following steps:

1) `git clone REPOSITORY_URL`
2) `cd DIRECTORY`
3) `git submodule update --init`
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

meson.build:91:19: ERROR: Subproject exists but has no meson.build file.


Answer: This is the actual error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [go: cloud.google.com/go/compute in vendor/modules.txt requires go >= 1.23.0 (running go 1.22.9; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)
]: [reason why the build failed, specifically a dependency requires newer version of Go than is available]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)]: [denotes phase of the RPM build which failed; the %build phase itself]


Answer: Issue: One of the dependencies requires a newer version of Go than is available
Resolution: Package newer version of Go, or try building older version of the package that doesn't require newer Go
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
go: cloud.google.com/go/compute in vendor/modules.txt requires go >= 1.23.0 (running go 1.22.9; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)


Answer: reason why the build failed, specifically a dependency requires newer version of Go than is available
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)

Answer: denotes phase of the RPM build which failed; the %build phase itself
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=avr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3
checking build system type... Invalid configuration 'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3': more than four components
configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3 failed
]: [configure error caused build to fail]


Answer: Issue: Invalid value used for configure option --enable-debug-info
Resolution: Check configure --help for valid values to specified option
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=avr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3
checking build system type... Invalid configuration 'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3': more than four components
configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3 failed


Answer: configure error caused build to fail
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [  ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  ── Failure ('test-timezone.R:7:5'): with_timezone: changes the time zone ───────
  ... %in% c("PDT", "PST") is not TRUE]: [Testsuite result with failed test output]


Answer: Issue: Failed test 
Resolution: This tests works with timezone - verify that the tzdata package is installed, or identify the specific part of the code it is testing
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  ── Failure ('test-timezone.R:7:5'): with_timezone: changes the time zone ───────
  ... %in% c("PDT", "PST") is not TRUE

Answer: Testsuite result with failed test output
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(requests) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(setuptools) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(filelock) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(munch) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(requests-toolbelt) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
]: [Dnf apparently fails to install build dependencies.]
=============
[nothing provides python3.13dist(setuptools) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base]: [python3-copr dep from copr_base repo (from copr, not from the base repo) depends on `python3.13dist(setuptools)`]


Answer: Issue: It is bad as we can not find it in logs, but Fedora Rawhide switched against Python 3.14, and rebuild all the provided packages.

The Copr repository `copr_base` though still contains packages built against Python 3.13, and these can not be installed together with Python 3.14 runtime.  Hence this failure.

Resolution: The packages in Copr (fedora rawhide chroots) need to be rebuilt against the new Fedora Rawhide Python runtime 3.14 first.  Example python3-copr-common and python3-copr.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(requests) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(setuptools) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(filelock) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(munch) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(requests-toolbelt) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base


Answer: Dnf apparently fails to install build dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
nothing provides python3.13dist(setuptools) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base

Answer: python3-copr dep from copr_base repo (from copr, not from the base repo) depends on `python3.13dist(setuptools)`
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Handling poetry-core>=1.1.0,<=1.9.1 from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: poetry-core>=1.1.0,<=1.9.1
Handling setuptools_rust>=1.3,<=1.10.2 from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: setuptools_rust>=1.3,<=1.10.2
Exiting dependency generation pass: build backend]: [poetry-core and setupttols_rust are not present in required versions.]


Answer: Issue: Requirement for building a package are not satisfied.
Resolution: Provide poetry-core and setuptools_rust in required versions.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Handling poetry-core>=1.1.0,<=1.9.1 from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: poetry-core>=1.1.0,<=1.9.1
Handling setuptools_rust>=1.3,<=1.10.2 from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: setuptools_rust>=1.3,<=1.10.2
Exiting dependency generation pass: build backend

Answer: poetry-core and setupttols_rust are not present in required versions.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ !! Copr timeout => sending INT
WARNING: Machine a97e46b4dd5e489ba0437eef36214d35 still running. Killing...
Copr build error: Build failed]: [This is an information from Copr buildsystem that this build is taking too long and reach the timeout level.]


Answer: Issue: Copr killed this build because it reached the timeout level. Builds are not allowed to run forever. The default limit is 5 hours (18000 seconds) but users can increase it up to 30 hours (108000 seconds).
Resolution: When you are submitting a new build you can specify the Timeout. The option is available both in WebUI and CLI (--timeout) and is specified in seconds.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 !! Copr timeout => sending INT
WARNING: Machine a97e46b4dd5e489ba0437eef36214d35 still running. Killing...
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: This is an information from Copr buildsystem that this build is taking too long and reach the timeout level.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign  !! Copr timeout => sending INT]: [Test named `tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign` in pytest run for too long and because of that the Copr build reached its build timeout thus Copr terminated this build as failed.]


Answer: Issue: The Copr build reached its timeout because of a stuck test case thus the build was terminated and labeled as failed.
Resolution: Fix the test case.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign  !! Copr timeout => sending INT

Answer: Test named `tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign` in pytest run for too long and because of that the Copr build reached its build timeout thus Copr terminated this build as failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: invalid command 'test']: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: setup.py test was deprecated and removed.
Resolution: Use supported test invocation. E.g. add BuildRequires:  python3-pytest and use %pytest in 	
%check section of SPEC file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: invalid command 'test'

Answer: Error message