fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [-f /builddir/build/BUILD/linux-libre-6.15_rc7-build/linux-6.15-rc7/Makefile 
***
*** Configuration file ".config" not found!
***
*** Please run some configurator (e.g. "make oldconfig" or
*** "make menuconfig" or "make xconfig").
***]: [Description of the make error]


Answer: Issue: Make coudn't find the configuration file
Resolution: Provide the config file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
-f /builddir/build/BUILD/linux-libre-6.15_rc7-build/linux-6.15-rc7/Makefile 
***
*** Configuration file ".config" not found!
***
*** Please run some configurator (e.g. "make oldconfig" or
*** "make menuconfig" or "make xconfig").
***

Answer: Description of the make error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:1785:25: error: too many arguments to function ‘SYSTEM_BG’; expected 0, have 1
 1785 |                         SYSTEM_BG("splash.bmp");
      |                         ^~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:19:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:30:6: note: declared here
   30 | void SYSTEM_BG();
      |      ^~~~~~~~~]: [Build failure - incorrect function call in C code]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shipsdl2.c:409:6: error: conflicting types for ‘SYSTEM_DRAW_BG’; have ‘void(char *)’
  409 | void SYSTEM_DRAW_BG(char *bmp)
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shipsdl2.c:7:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:31:6: note: previous declaration of ‘SYSTEM_DRAW_BG’ with type ‘void(void)’
   31 | void SYSTEM_DRAW_BG();
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Build failiure - double declaration of a function with conflicting arguments]


Answer: Issue: The SYSTEM_BG() function was called with an argument, but it's defined without any, causing the compilation to fail.

The SYSTEM_DRAW_BG is being declared twice, once as void(char *), second time as void(void).  That is not allowed in C.
Resolution: Remove the argument from the SYSTEM_BG function call

Unify the SYSTEM_DRAW_BG function delaration or remove one of the declarations to fix the conflict.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:1785:25: error: too many arguments to function ‘SYSTEM_BG’; expected 0, have 1
 1785 |                         SYSTEM_BG("splash.bmp");
      |                         ^~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:19:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:30:6: note: declared here
   30 | void SYSTEM_BG();
      |      ^~~~~~~~~

Answer: Build failure - incorrect function call in C code
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shipsdl2.c:409:6: error: conflicting types for ‘SYSTEM_DRAW_BG’; have ‘void(char *)’
  409 | void SYSTEM_DRAW_BG(char *bmp)
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shipsdl2.c:7:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:31:6: note: previous declaration of ‘SYSTEM_DRAW_BG’ with type ‘void(void)’
   31 | void SYSTEM_DRAW_BG();
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Build failiure - double declaration of a function with conflicting arguments
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [tcl/tclWrapper.cpp:444:37: error: ‘TCL_CHANNEL_VERSION_2’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘TCL_CHANNEL_VERSION_5’?]: [Error in the syntax finding a constant/macro.]


Answer: Issue: The constant/macro TCL_CHANNEL_VERSION_2 not declared.
Resolution: Properly declare constant/macro.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tcl/tclWrapper.cpp:444:37: error: ‘TCL_CHANNEL_VERSION_2’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘TCL_CHANNEL_VERSION_5’?

Answer: Error in the syntax finding a constant/macro.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ValueError: invalid pyproject.toml config: `project.license`.
configuration error: `project.license` must be valid exactly by one definition (2 matches found):

    - keys:
        'file': {type: string}
      required: ['file']
    - keys:
        'text': {type: string}
      required: ['text']]: [The key "license" under section "project" in the file "pyproject.toml" contains string. But expected content is either "text" or "file" section.]


Answer: Issue: Because a file pyptoject.toml has wrong format.
Resolution: The key "license" under section "project" in the file "pyproject.toml" should be fixed to correct format. Either file or text. The easisest way would be to change string "MIT" to a section { text = "MIT" }
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ValueError: invalid pyproject.toml config: `project.license`.
configuration error: `project.license` must be valid exactly by one definition (2 matches found):

    - keys:
        'file': {type: string}
      required: ['file']
    - keys:
        'text': {type: string}
      required: ['text']

Answer: The key "license" under section "project" in the file "pyproject.toml" contains string. But expected content is either "text" or "file" section.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.3 (running go 1.22.12; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)]: [Build failure reason.]


Answer: Issue: The build process requires go package in version 1.23.3 or higher. Current version is 1.22.12.
Resolution: Set requirements for go package to be at least in version 1.23.3 in your .spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.3 (running go 1.22.12; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)

Answer: Build failure reason.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ssh-agent] Looking for ssh-agent implementation...
[ssh-agent]   Exec ssh-agent (binary ssh-agent on a remote machine)
$ ssh-agent
SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/ssh-XXXXXXdKU0Vh/agent.42927
SSH_AGENT_PID=42929
[ssh-agent] Started.
Running ssh-add (command line suppressed)
Identity added: /home/jenkins/workspace/RHEL-10.0/subscription-manager-cockpit@tmp/private_key_14696866137573535711.key (rhsm-qe@auto-services.usersys.redhat.com)
[ssh-agent] Using credentials jenkins (rhsm-qe)

Answer: jenkins provides ssh-agent
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
> git rev-parse --resolve-git-dir /home/jenkins/workspace/RHEL-10.0/subscription-manager-cockpit/.git # timeout=10
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
 > git config remote.origin.url https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/RHSM-QE/rhsm-ansible-qe # timeout=10
Fetching upstream changes from https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/RHSM-QE/rhsm-ansible-qe
 > git --version # timeout=10
 > git --version # 'git version 2.48.1'
 > git fetch --tags --force --progress -- https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/RHSM-QE/rhsm-ansible-qe +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* # timeout=10
 > git rev-parse origin/main^{commit} # timeout=10
Checking out Revision fdf2ce595dd50a1610819052fcf4904a75f960ba (origin/main)
 > git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10
 > git checkout -f fdf2ce595dd50a1610819052fcf4904a75f960ba # timeout=10
Commit message: "Merge branch 'rhc-highavailability' into 'main'"
 > git rev-list --no-walk fdf2ce595dd50a1610819052fcf4904a75f960ba # timeout=10
Cleaning workspace
 > git rev-parse --verify HEAD # timeout=10
Resetting working tree
 > git reset --hard # timeout=10
 > git clean -fdx # timeout=10

Answer: git command to fetch tested repo
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement already satisfied: pip in ./env/lib64/python3.12/site-packages (23.3.2)
Collecting pip
  Using cached pip-25.0.1-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (3.7 kB)
Using cached pip-25.0.1-py3-none-any.whl (1.8 MB)
Installing collected packages: pip
  Attempting uninstall: pip
    Found existing installation: pip 23.3.2
    Uninstalling pip-23.3.2:
      Successfully uninstalled pip-23.3.2
Successfully installed pip-25.0.1
Collecting wheel
  Downloading wheel-0.45.1-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (2.3 kB)
Collecting setuptools_rust
  Downloading setuptools_rust-1.10.2-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (9.2 kB)
Collecting setuptools>=62.4 (from setuptools_rust)
  Downloading setuptools-76.0.0-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (6.7 kB)
Collecting semantic-version<3,>=2.8.2 (from setuptools_rust)
  Downloading semantic_version-2.10.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl.metadata (9.7 kB)
Downloading wheel-0.45.1-py3-none-any.whl (72 kB)
Downloading setuptools_rust-1.10.2-py3-none-any.whl (26 kB)
Downloading semantic_version-2.10.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl (15 kB)
Downloading setuptools-76.0.0-py3-none-any.whl (1.2 MB)
   ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1.2/1.2 MB 60.7 MB/s eta 0:00:00
Installing collected packages: wheel, setuptools, semantic-version, setuptools_rust
Successfully installed semantic-version-2.10.0 setuptools-76.0.0 setuptools_rust-1.10.2 wheel-0.45.1
Collecting ansible (from -r requirements.txt (line 1))
  Downloading ansible-11.3.0-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (8.0 kB)
Collecting ansible-lint (from -r requirements.txt (line 2))
  Downloading ansible_lint-25.1.3-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (6.8 kB)
Collecting ara (from -r requirements.txt (line 3))

Answer: activate python environment
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ansible-playbook -i localhost.ini -e chromedriver_version=133.0.6943.98 playbooks/install-chromedriver.yml
[DEPRECATION WARNING]: community.general.yaml has been deprecated. The plugin 
has been superseded by the the option `result_format=yaml` in callback plugin 
ansible.builtin.default from ansible-core 2.13 onwards. This feature will be 
removed from community.general in version 13.0.0. Deprecation warnings can be 
disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.
Operations to perform:
  Apply all migrations: admin, api, auth, contenttypes, db, ses

Answer: chrome-driver  version installed in  machine
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Patch #0 (version-fixes.diff):
+ cd pcsx2
+ echo 'Patch #0 (version-fixes.diff):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p0 --fuzz=0
patching file cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake
Hunk #1 FAILED at 95.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BdmXPD (%prep)]: [The Patch version-fixes.diff application failed.]
=============
[Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BdmXPD
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ git clone https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2 --recursive]: [The %prep section contains `git clone`. This is non-standard; typical RPM build is offline. Anyway, this makes the build "sensitive" for external changes and the patch application may get broken (as it happened) very easily.]


Answer: Issue: The spec file uses patch `version-fixes.diff` which is not applicable against the current sources.
Resolution: Fix the patch, or drop it - depending whether it is needed or not.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Patch #0 (version-fixes.diff):
+ cd pcsx2
+ echo 'Patch #0 (version-fixes.diff):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p0 --fuzz=0
patching file cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake
Hunk #1 FAILED at 95.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BdmXPD (%prep)

Answer: The Patch version-fixes.diff application failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BdmXPD
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ git clone https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2 --recursive

Answer: The %prep section contains `git clone`. This is non-standard; typical RPM build is offline. Anyway, this makes the build "sensitive" for external changes and the patch application may get broken (as it happened) very easily.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LlGRXf
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD/supernovas-1.1.1-build
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD/supernovas-1.1.1-build
+ rm -rf SuperNOVAS-1.1.1
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x /builddir/build/SOURCES/v1.1.1-2.tar.gz
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd SuperNOVAS-1.1.1
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LlGRXf: line 41: cd: SuperNOVAS-1.1.1: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LlGRXf (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LlGRXf (%prep)
]: [This part indicated that during %prep phase the upstream archive was extracted, but it does not contained `SuperNOVAS-1.1.1` directory.]


Answer: Issue: During %prep phase you usually use %setup macro to extract upstream archive and cd into top-level directory. By default the directory is assumed to be %name-%version. But some upstream archive has different structure. In such case the build fails unless you tell %setup macro what to do.
Resolution: Check what is inside of the tarball and check what arguments to %setup macro is suitable for you. The relevant documentation is http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LlGRXf
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD/supernovas-1.1.1-build
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD/supernovas-1.1.1-build
+ rm -rf SuperNOVAS-1.1.1
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x /builddir/build/SOURCES/v1.1.1-2.tar.gz
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd SuperNOVAS-1.1.1
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LlGRXf: line 41: cd: SuperNOVAS-1.1.1: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LlGRXf (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LlGRXf (%prep)


Answer: This part indicated that during %prep phase the upstream archive was extracted, but it does not contained `SuperNOVAS-1.1.1` directory.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [stdout: No spec file found at /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-ddehpqm9/Rokon.
]: [No spec file found for the build job.]


Answer: Issue: Because there is no spec file for the build.
Resolution: Source git tree should be checked and use proper parameters for making build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
stdout: No spec file found at /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-ddehpqm9/Rokon.


Answer: No spec file found for the build job.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ install -Dpm 0644 '%{SOURCE1}' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/polkit-125-2.el10.x86_64/usr/lib/sysusers.d/polkit.conf
install: cannot stat '%{SOURCE1}': No such file or directory]: [Error report that announces missing sysuser configuration.]


Answer: Issue: %files section defines a file in sysusers configuration directory, but that file is missing from sources.
Resolution: Provide the sysusers configuration file in package sources or delete the associated line from %files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ install -Dpm 0644 '%{SOURCE1}' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/polkit-125-2.el10.x86_64/usr/lib/sysusers.d/polkit.conf
install: cannot stat '%{SOURCE1}': No such file or directory

Answer: Error report that announces missing sysuser configuration.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
../../designer/pluginloader.cpp:146:17: error: âPy_SetProgramNameâ was not declared in this scope; did you mean âPy_GetProgramNameâ]: [object not declared in this scope]


Answer: Issue: some of the objects in the codebase are not declared
Resolution: look into the codebase to fix the declaration
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

../../designer/pluginloader.cpp:146:17: error: âPy_SetProgramNameâ was not declared in this scope; did you mean âPy_GetProgramNameâ

Answer: object not declared in this scope
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [gdl-dock-item.c: In function âgdl_dock_item_class_initâ:
gdl-dock-item.c:358:44: error: passing argument 1 of âgdl_dock_object_class_set_is_compoundâ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  358 |     gdl_dock_object_class_set_is_compound (object_class, FALSE);
      |                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                            |
      |                                            GObjectClass * {aka struct _GObjectClass *}]: [An incompatible pointer type is used as a parameter of a function. Expected type is GdlDockObjectClass but argument is GObjectClass.]


Answer: Issue: Because of error in the code - function parameters does not match definition in the library.
Resolution: The code should be refactored for the particular version of used library.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gdl-dock-item.c: In function âgdl_dock_item_class_initâ:
gdl-dock-item.c:358:44: error: passing argument 1 of âgdl_dock_object_class_set_is_compoundâ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  358 |     gdl_dock_object_class_set_is_compound (object_class, FALSE);
      |                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                            |
      |                                            GObjectClass * {aka struct _GObjectClass *}

Answer: An incompatible pointer type is used as a parameter of a function. Expected type is GdlDockObjectClass but argument is GObjectClass.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [data-0.1.10-7.fc40.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-38-i686-1706522093.453969/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-38-i686-1706522093.453969/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-38-i686-1706522093.453969/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-boutdata-0.1.10-7.fc40.src.rpm) Config(fedora-38-i686) 12 minutes 35 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 7834cd255aa242c2951ef26db2b68f9b -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-38-i686-1706522093.453969/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4sawjlru:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bi]: [Final build failure report.]
=============
[
MemoryError
double free or corruption (!prev)
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7TEebN: line 55:   472 Aborted                 (core dumped) CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-${RPM_LD_FLAGS}}" PATH="/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-boutdata-0.1.10-7.fc40.i386/usr/bin:$PATH" PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH:-/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-boutdata-0.1.10-7.fc40.i386/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages:/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-boutdata-0.1.10-7.fc40.i386/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages}" PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 PYTEST_ADDOPTS="${PYTEST_ADDOPTS:-} --ignore=/builddir/build/BUILD/boutdata-0.1.10/.pyproject-builddir" PYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS="${PYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS:-4}" /usr/bin/pytes]: [Memory error, core dumped, during unit test run.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed during test execution due to memory error. Possibly due to attempt to free already memory that has been already freed, or derereferenced.
Resolution: Ensure correct memory handling in your test code.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
data-0.1.10-7.fc40.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-38-i686-1706522093.453969/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-38-i686-1706522093.453969/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-38-i686-1706522093.453969/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-boutdata-0.1.10-7.fc40.src.rpm) Config(fedora-38-i686) 12 minutes 35 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 7834cd255aa242c2951ef26db2b68f9b -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-38-i686-1706522093.453969/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4sawjlru:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bi

Answer: Final build failure report.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

MemoryError
double free or corruption (!prev)
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7TEebN: line 55:   472 Aborted                 (core dumped) CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-${RPM_LD_FLAGS}}" PATH="/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-boutdata-0.1.10-7.fc40.i386/usr/bin:$PATH" PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH:-/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-boutdata-0.1.10-7.fc40.i386/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages:/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-boutdata-0.1.10-7.fc40.i386/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages}" PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 PYTEST_ADDOPTS="${PYTEST_ADDOPTS:-} --ignore=/builddir/build/BUILD/boutdata-0.1.10/.pyproject-builddir" PYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS="${PYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS:-4}" /usr/bin/pytes

Answer: Memory error, core dumped, during unit test run.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ rm -rv ansible_collections/google/cloud/scripts/
rm: cannot remove 'ansible_collections/google/cloud/scripts/': No such file or directory
]: [A directory ansible_collections/google/cloud/scripts/ does not exist in the source code so it could not be deleted.]


Answer: Issue: Because preparation phase failed due to missing directory in the source code which is requested to be deleted during that phase.
Resolution: The most probably it is error in the build script or spec file. Because that particular directory is not needed in the fact - and it was requested to be deleted - it should not be mentioned in the build script.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ rm -rv ansible_collections/google/cloud/scripts/
rm: cannot remove 'ansible_collections/google/cloud/scripts/': No such file or directory


Answer: A directory ansible_collections/google/cloud/scripts/ does not exist in the source code so it could not be deleted.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/guestfish
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/guestmount
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/guestunmount
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/libguestfs-test-tool
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-copy-in
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-copy-out
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-rescue
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-tar-in
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-tar-out
RPM build errors:
    Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_6]: [Files listed in %files specfile section are not installed]


Answer: Issue: Because `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/*` files listed in %files section are not being installed 
Resolution: Review why these files are not installed, and decide if to remove these files from %files section or fix the %install section so these files are installed in the right directory
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/guestfish
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/guestmount
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/guestunmount
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/libguestfs-test-tool
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-copy-in
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-copy-out
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-rescue
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-tar-in
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/virt-tar-out
RPM build errors:
    Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libguestfs-1.52.0-7.fc41.x86_6

Answer: Files listed in %files specfile section are not installed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ 0:00.83 ERROR: The target C compiler is version 13.3.1, while the target C++ compiler is version 8.5.0. Need to use the same compiler version.
 0:00.87 W Exception when writing resource usage file: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/builddir/build/BUILD/firefox-128.9.0/objdir/.mozbuild/profile_build_resources.json'
 Config object not found by mach.
*** Fix above errors and then restart with "./mach build"
]: [Pre-copile check for compatible versions od compiler error]


Answer: Issue: There are not compatible compiler versions available on the builder.
Resolution: Install proper versions of compilers.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 0:00.83 ERROR: The target C compiler is version 13.3.1, while the target C++ compiler is version 8.5.0. Need to use the same compiler version.
 0:00.87 W Exception when writing resource usage file: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/builddir/build/BUILD/firefox-128.9.0/objdir/.mozbuild/profile_build_resources.json'
 Config object not found by mach.
*** Fix above errors and then restart with "./mach build"


Answer: Pre-copile check for compatible versions od compiler error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.41.12-518.fc43.x86_64 from copr_base and perl-libs-4:5.40.2-517.fc43.x86_64 from fedora
  - package perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2019.001-23.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires libperl.so.5.40()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates]: [The error message is saying that dnf5 is not able to install package perl-Unicode-LineBreak which is needed for perl-Term-Table.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed, because dependency 'perl-Unicode-LineBreak' was not built with the perl 5.41.12 which is used in buildroot.
Resolution: perl-Unicode-LineBreak has to be rebuild with new perl 5.41.12 and than can be rebuild perl-Term-Table.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.41.12-518.fc43.x86_64 from copr_base and perl-libs-4:5.40.2-517.fc43.x86_64 from fedora
  - package perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2019.001-23.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires libperl.so.5.40()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates

Answer: The error message is saying that dnf5 is not able to install package perl-Unicode-LineBreak which is needed for perl-Term-Table.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(oslo-utils) >= 3.33 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(oslo-i18n) >= 3.15.3 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(iso8601) >= 0.1.11 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(prettytable) >= 0.7.2 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(stevedore) >= 2.0.1 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(oslo-serialization) >= 2.20 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(pbr) >= 3 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(keystoneauth1) >= 3.5 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
]: [Multiple required packages are not available.]


Answer: Issue: Necessary dependencies were not available, this caused the build to fail.
Resolution: Ensure that all required dependencies are present in installed repos before attempting to build the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(oslo-utils) >= 3.33 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(oslo-i18n) >= 3.15.3 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(iso8601) >= 0.1.11 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(prettytable) >= 0.7.2 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(stevedore) >= 2.0.1 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(oslo-serialization) >= 2.20 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(pbr) >= 3 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(keystoneauth1) >= 3.5 needed by python3-novaclient-1:18.7.0-2.fc42.noarch from fedora


Answer: Multiple required packages are not available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated]: [A message saying that the process was terminated due to buffer overflow.]
=============
[FAIL domain-test (exit status: 134)]: [The particular test run result of value 'FAIL'.]
=============
[Testsuite summary for avahi 0.8
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 7
# PASS:  6
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
See avahi-common/test-suite.log for debugging.
Some test(s) failed.  Please report this to avahi (at) lists (dot) freedesktop (dot) org,
together with the test-suite.log file (gzipped) and your system
information.  Thanks.]: [Overall testsuite summary table, whose overall result is 'failed' due to one particular test failure.]


Answer: Issue: One particular test named 'domain-test' in the testsuite has failed and that failed the complete build.
Resolution: Fix the buffer overflow error in the 'domain-test' test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated

Answer: A message saying that the process was terminated due to buffer overflow.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL domain-test (exit status: 134)

Answer: The particular test run result of value 'FAIL'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Testsuite summary for avahi 0.8
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 7
# PASS:  6
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
See avahi-common/test-suite.log for debugging.
Some test(s) failed.  Please report this to avahi (at) lists (dot) freedesktop (dot) org,
together with the test-suite.log file (gzipped) and your system
information.  Thanks.

Answer: Overall testsuite summary table, whose overall result is 'failed' due to one particular test failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'opensuse-tumbleweed-oss':
  - Status code: 404 for https://slc-mirror.opensuse.org/tumbleweed/repo/oss/repodata/0f99b390d4bfec93be22bd85e64559c810d3295517334259183a66f6afe6d4c5abddb1cb28b677118ace05b2cc1f45373e9f56aa8b46f91cf525e5a2959e2b8e-primary.xml.zst (IP: 2a07:de40:617e:1904::10)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'opensuse-tumbleweed-oss': Yum repo downloading error: Downloading error(s): repodata/0f99b390d4bfec93be22bd85e64559c810d3295517334259183a66f6afe6d4c5abddb1cb28b677118ace05b2cc1f45373e9f56aa8b46f91cf525e5a2959e2b8e-primary.xml.zst - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-atx7kz5m/wezterm-nightly/wezterm.spec) Config(opensuse-tumbleweed-x86_64) 4 minutes 39 seconds
]: [Download of repository metadata timed out]


Answer: Issue: It wasn't possible to fetch metadata of repository due to infrastructure failure
Resolution: Report infrastructure failure
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'opensuse-tumbleweed-oss':
  - Status code: 404 for https://slc-mirror.opensuse.org/tumbleweed/repo/oss/repodata/0f99b390d4bfec93be22bd85e64559c810d3295517334259183a66f6afe6d4c5abddb1cb28b677118ace05b2cc1f45373e9f56aa8b46f91cf525e5a2959e2b8e-primary.xml.zst (IP: 2a07:de40:617e:1904::10)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'opensuse-tumbleweed-oss': Yum repo downloading error: Downloading error(s): repodata/0f99b390d4bfec93be22bd85e64559c810d3295517334259183a66f6afe6d4c5abddb1cb28b677118ace05b2cc1f45373e9f56aa8b46f91cf525e5a2959e2b8e-primary.xml.zst - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-atx7kz5m/wezterm-nightly/wezterm.spec) Config(opensuse-tumbleweed-x86_64) 4 minutes 39 seconds


Answer: Download of repository metadata timed out