fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
  Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
    "/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
  in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES.  Possible reasons include:
  * The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
  * An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
  * The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
  provide.
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
  Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
    "/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
  in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES.  Possible reasons include:
  * The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
  * An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
  * The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
  provide.

Answer: You are missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
]: [RPM transaction has failed.]
=============
[Problem 1: package tcl-devel-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tcl = 1:9.0.0-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tcl-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc42.ppc64le from fedora
  - package python3.9-3.9.21-1.fc42.ppc64le from fedora requires libtcl8.6.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests]: [Seems that the tcl-devel package requires tcl package of version tcl-1:9.0.0-1, however, this version can't be installed together with tcl-1:8.6.15-6 which is already requested.]
=============
[Problem 2: package tk-devel-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tk = 1:9.0.0-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package tk-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires libtcl9.0.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package tk-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tcl = 1:9.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tcl-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc42.ppc64le from fedora
  - package tix-1:8.4.3-41.fc41.ppc64le from fedora requires tcl(abi) = 8.6, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package tix-devel-1:8.4.3-41.fc41.ppc64le from fedora requires tix = 1:8.4.3-41.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests]: [The RPM transaction has a conflicting requests.

The tk-devel package requires the tk package in version 1:9.0.0-1 which is not available.
The tix package requires tcl(abi) = 8.6 which is not available.]


Answer: Issue: The RPM transaction contains requirements which can't be satisfied. Some packages are missing or are not available in the required version.
Resolution: Please make sure the spec file dependencies are correctly set and that these dependent packages are available during the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:


Answer: RPM transaction has failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 1: package tcl-devel-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tcl = 1:9.0.0-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tcl-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc42.ppc64le from fedora
  - package python3.9-3.9.21-1.fc42.ppc64le from fedora requires libtcl8.6.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests

Answer: Seems that the tcl-devel package requires tcl package of version tcl-1:9.0.0-1, however, this version can't be installed together with tcl-1:8.6.15-6 which is already requested.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 2: package tk-devel-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tk = 1:9.0.0-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package tk-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires libtcl9.0.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package tk-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tcl = 1:9.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tcl-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc42.ppc64le from fedora
  - package tix-1:8.4.3-41.fc41.ppc64le from fedora requires tcl(abi) = 8.6, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package tix-devel-1:8.4.3-41.fc41.ppc64le from fedora requires tix = 1:8.4.3-41.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests

Answer: The RPM transaction has a conflicting requests.

The tk-devel package requires the tk package in version 1:9.0.0-1 which is not available.
The tix package requires tcl(abi) = 8.6 which is not available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com> 0.1.1-2]: [error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com> 0.1.1-2]


Answer: Issue: Bad changelog format
Resolution: Fix the format.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com> 0.1.1-2

Answer: error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com> 0.1.1-2
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/default) < 4.5.0~)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/derive) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/derive) < 4.5.0~)
]: [Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/default) < 4.5.0~)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/derive) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/derive) < 4.5.0~)
]


Answer: Issue: Fedora rawhide repository does not have packaged dependencies with correct version
Resolution: Update existing packages to provide required version or add them if missing. Alternatively build older version, which has all dependencies already present in repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/default) < 4.5.0~)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/derive) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/derive) < 4.5.0~)


Answer: Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/default) < 4.5.0~)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/derive) >= 4.4.0 with crate(clap/derive) < 4.5.0~)
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: hipblas-devel]: [Package hipblas-devel is not available.]


Answer: Issue: Dependencies required to build package ollama are not available.
Resolution: This issue is usually hard to solve. If you are sure that the dependencies are meant to be available, check repositories available to your buildroot environment if the particular builds are in place.

If the dependencies are not available, you need to work with their maintainer to solve this issue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: hipblas-devel

Answer: Package hipblas-devel is not available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [qtcwin.c:175:6: error: conflicting types for ‘draw_qtc_panel’; have ‘void(int)’
  175 | void draw_qtc_panel(int direction) {
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
qtcwin.c:56:6: note: previous declaration of ‘draw_qtc_panel’ with type ‘void(void)’
   56 | void draw_qtc_panel();
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
]: [This is relevant error message showing that compilation failed due to incompatible data types.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to switch to C23 C compiler standard which is more strict.
Resolution: Either fix the source code to use compatible data types for the draw_qtc_panel or recompile with the older C standard, e.g. add the -std=gnu17 option to the CFLAGS.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
qtcwin.c:175:6: error: conflicting types for ‘draw_qtc_panel’; have ‘void(int)’
  175 | void draw_qtc_panel(int direction) {
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
qtcwin.c:56:6: note: previous declaration of ‘draw_qtc_panel’ with type ‘void(void)’
   56 | void draw_qtc_panel();
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Answer: This is relevant error message showing that compilation failed due to incompatible data types.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [out of memory]: [This indicates that the machine didn't have enough RAM to compile the code]


Answer: Issue: There wasn't enough RAM (system memory) to compile the code
Resolution: Increase the system memory (RAM) in the build environment. Alternatively, there might be a bug in the compiler or the test suite (depending where this error occurs) that drains the available memory. This can be investigated by a developer.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
out of memory

Answer: This indicates that the machine didn't have enough RAM to compile the code
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[INFO] BUILD FAILURE]: [indicates maven build failure]
=============
[class file has wrong version 55.0, should be 52.0]: [incompatible java bytecode version]


Answer: Issue: package depends on a library that is compiled with newer java bytecode than the package being built
Resolution: change maven compiler plugin settings and increase java source/target/release levels
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE

Answer: indicates maven build failure
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
class file has wrong version 55.0, should be 52.0

Answer: incompatible java bytecode version
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Processing files: mariadb-server-11.4.5-100.fc43.x86_64
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.4-11.4.5-build/BUILDROOT/etc/my.cnf.d/hashicorp_key_management.cnf]: [Build failure reason.]


Answer: Issue: The /etc/my.cnf.conf file is missing in the BUILDROOT directory.
Resolution: In the spec file you have probably set /etc/my.cnf.conf as one of the files that should be part of mariadb-server-galera package. Make sure you have generated or provided this file in any other way during the build phase so the file can be added to the final package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Processing files: mariadb-server-11.4.5-100.fc43.x86_64
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.4-11.4.5-build/BUILDROOT/etc/my.cnf.d/hashicorp_key_management.cnf

Answer: Build failure reason.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QiUBf8: line 86: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/lib64/gimp/%{api_version}/interpreters/pygimp.interp: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QiUBf8 (%install)]: [Build failure reason.]


Answer: Issue: It looks like some rpm variables are not defined in your .spec file.
Resolution: Take a look at your .spec file and define all locally created variables.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QiUBf8: line 86: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/lib64/gimp/%{api_version}/interpreters/pygimp.interp: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QiUBf8 (%install)

Answer: Build failure reason.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [tif_getimage.c:2948:13: warning: implicit declaration of function 'TIFFErrorExtR'; did you mean 'TIFFErrorExt'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
 2948 |             TIFFErrorExtR(tif, TIFFFileName(tif),
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |             TIFFErrorExt
]: [This snippet shows that function has not been defined nor declared anywhere which is the reason for undefined reference error later.]
=============
[/usr/bin/ld: ../libtiff/.libs/libtiff.so: undefined reference to `TIFFErrorExtR'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
]: [This shows direct point of failue, ld can't proceed.]


Answer: Issue: Linker was not able to find required function
Resolution: Some file was not included in linking process if this function is already defined somewhere. If it isn't then it can be either typo or difference in API that requested function is not available in this version
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tif_getimage.c:2948:13: warning: implicit declaration of function 'TIFFErrorExtR'; did you mean 'TIFFErrorExt'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
 2948 |             TIFFErrorExtR(tif, TIFFFileName(tif),
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |             TIFFErrorExt


Answer: This snippet shows that function has not been defined nor declared anywhere which is the reason for undefined reference error later.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/ld: ../libtiff/.libs/libtiff.so: undefined reference to `TIFFErrorExtR'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status


Answer: This shows direct point of failue, ld can't proceed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [2 errors out of 336434 tests on  Linux 32-bit little-endian
!Failures on these tests: func4-2.46 func4-5.2]: [There are two test failures from the sqlite test suite.
]
=============
[! func4-2.46 expected: [{}]
! func4-2.46 got:      [9007199254740992.0]
! func4-5.23 expected: [{}]
! func4-5.23 got:      [9007199254740992]: [Sqlite tests func4-2.46 and func4-5.23 failed]


Answer: Issue: There is a test suite run during the sqlite RPM build. It needs to pass for the RPM build to succeed. Two test cases failed in this build.
Resolution: Reproduce the test case failures and analyze them. You're encouraged to work with the upstream community of sqlite to resolve the test failures. When you resolve them, create a downstream patch that will fix those two tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
2 errors out of 336434 tests on  Linux 32-bit little-endian
!Failures on these tests: func4-2.46 func4-5.2

Answer: There are two test failures from the sqlite test suite.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
! func4-2.46 expected: [{}]
! func4-2.46 got:      [9007199254740992.0]
! func4-5.23 expected: [{}]
! func4-5.23 got:      [9007199254740992

Answer: Sqlite tests func4-2.46 and func4-5.23 failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [  Could not find a configuration file for package "Plasma5Support" that is
  compatible with requested version "6.3.4".]: [CMake cannot find a package for Plasma5Support in version "6.3.4".]
=============
[    /usr/lib64/cmake/Plasma5Support/Plasma5SupportConfig.cmake, version: 6.3.3
    /lib64/cmake/Plasma5Support/Plasma5SupportConfig.cmake, version: 6.3.3]: [Plasma5Support package is only available in version "6.3.3".]


Answer: Issue: Build requirements are not met for package "plasma-workspace". It requires Plasma5Support in version "6.3.4" but only version "6.3.3" is available.
Resolution: Build Plasma5Support in version "6.3.4" and make it available in the buildroot or check if this requirement needs to be so strict and loosen it if "6.3.3" would work.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  Could not find a configuration file for package "Plasma5Support" that is
  compatible with requested version "6.3.4".

Answer: CMake cannot find a package for Plasma5Support in version "6.3.4".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    /usr/lib64/cmake/Plasma5Support/Plasma5SupportConfig.cmake, version: 6.3.3
    /lib64/cmake/Plasma5Support/Plasma5SupportConfig.cmake, version: 6.3.3

Answer: Plasma5Support package is only available in version "6.3.3".
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750427778.000591/root/ --releasever 43 /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750427778.000591/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/jrnl-4.2.1-1.fc43.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts]: [Failing dnf command.]
=============
[No match for argument: python3dist(pytest-bdd) >= 8]: [Unsatisfied dependency.]


Answer: Issue: Missing dnf dependency.
Resolution: Ensure dnf have repositories available with all build dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750427778.000591/root/ --releasever 43 /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750427778.000591/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/jrnl-4.2.1-1.fc43.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

Answer: Failing dnf command.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(pytest-bdd) >= 8

Answer: Unsatisfied dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/miniupnpc-2.3.3-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libminiupnpc.so.20]: [Missing file error]


Answer: Issue: Test failed because of missing file - needed updated version
Resolution: update object version
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/miniupnpc-2.3.3-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libminiupnpc.so.20

Answer: Missing file error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [WARNING:  open-ended dependency on rake (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on bundler (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on cloudwalk_handshake (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on funky-simplehttp (>= 0, development) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on yard (>= 0, development) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on posxml_parser (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on funky-emv (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  See https://guides.rubygems.org/specification-reference/ for help]: [Warnings about multiple under specified dependencies. While unlikely to cause a build failure, these issues may lead to incompatible versions being introduced.]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/da_funk-3.35.0/usr/share/gems/gems/da_funk-3.35.0/test/integration/mrb_eval_test.rb<internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require': cannot load such file -- io/console (LoadError)]: [Required file, or gem, `io/console` can not be loaded.]
=============
[<internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require': cannot load such file -- io/console/size (LoadError)]: [Required file,`io/console/size` can not be loaded. This is a constituent part of `io/console` gem.]


Answer: Issue: Default gem `io/console` is not present on the build system. This is a serious issue, as it should be packaged with the standard Ruby distribution.
Resolution: Ensure your Ruby installation is valid, ideally reinstalling it entirely after identifying why wasn't a one of default gems present.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on rake (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on bundler (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on cloudwalk_handshake (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on funky-simplehttp (>= 0, development) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on yard (>= 0, development) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on posxml_parser (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on funky-emv (>= 0) is not recommended
  use a bounded requirement, such as '~> x.y'
WARNING:  See https://guides.rubygems.org/specification-reference/ for help

Answer: Warnings about multiple under specified dependencies. While unlikely to cause a build failure, these issues may lead to incompatible versions being introduced.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/da_funk-3.35.0/usr/share/gems/gems/da_funk-3.35.0/test/integration/mrb_eval_test.rb<internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require': cannot load such file -- io/console (LoadError)

Answer: Required file, or gem, `io/console` can not be loaded.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
<internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:85:in `require': cannot load such file -- io/console/size (LoadError)

Answer: Required file,`io/console/size` can not be loaded. This is a constituent part of `io/console` gem.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ 'tags': [],
 'task_id': '9069244-fedora-eln-x86_64',
 'timeout': 18000,]: [The task is for Fedora ELN.]
=============
[ 'git_repo': 'https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/git/zdohnal/qpdf/R-qpdf',]: [It is a task in Copr repository]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: R-Rcpp-devel
No match for argument: R-askpass
No match for argument: R-curl
No match for argument: R-devel
No match for argument: R-testthat]: [DNF transaction error about missing packages]


Answer: Issue: Some of the required packages were not found in repositories when building for Fedora ELN in Copr.
Resolution: There are possible causes:
1. the missing packages are not in repositories at all - add them into repositories and rerun the build,
2. there is typo in their names - search for them with "dnf search", fix the package names in SPEC file and reupload the srpm in copr to rebuild it
3. the packages are present in eln-build repository, which is not present in Copr - you have to add repository link into specific chroot via Project Settings -> Project Details -> Build Options -> Chroots -> <chroot you want> -> Edit -> insert the link into 'Repos:' box.

How to find the link - go to /etc/mock/templates/fedora-eln.tpl, find the section '[local]' and take the url from option 'baseurl'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 'tags': [],
 'task_id': '9069244-fedora-eln-x86_64',
 'timeout': 18000,

Answer: The task is for Fedora ELN.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 'git_repo': 'https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/git/zdohnal/qpdf/R-qpdf',

Answer: It is a task in Copr repository
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: R-Rcpp-devel
No match for argument: R-askpass
No match for argument: R-curl
No match for argument: R-devel
No match for argument: R-testthat

Answer: DNF transaction error about missing packages
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Repositories loaded.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "pcre2-10.44-1.fc41.1.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mircommon) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mircommon-internal) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mirplatform) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mirrenderer) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mirserver-internal) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mirwayland) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1]: [It shows that there was an error during installation of dependencies in buildroot.]


Answer: Issue: The spec file requires packages mircommon, mircommon-intenal, mirplatform, mirlrendere, mirserver-internal, and mirwayland in version 2.19 or higher, but such version is not available.
Resolution: You need to either relax your dependencies or build the dependencies first.

You can find what package provides these dependencies by e.g., running

dnf repoquery 'pkgconfig(mircommon)'

and if there is already existing package, but in lower version, you need to contact a maintainer and ask him to build more recent version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Repositories loaded.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "pcre2-10.44-1.fc41.1.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mircommon) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mircommon-internal) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mirplatform) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mirrenderer) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mirserver-internal) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(mirwayland) >= 2.19
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1

Answer: It shows that there was an error during installation of dependencies in buildroot.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [gmake[2]: *** [intern/cycles/kernel/CMakeFiles/cycles_kernel_hip.dir/build.make:402: intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_gfx1010.fatbin] Error 1]: [Binary build for HIP Cycles Rendering failed]


Answer: Issue: Enabling Binary HIP Cycles Rendering caused failure on this version 4.4.0
Resolution: Temporary disable binary cycle engine
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gmake[2]: *** [intern/cycles/kernel/CMakeFiles/cycles_kernel_hip.dir/build.make:402: intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_gfx1010.fatbin] Error 1

Answer: Binary build for HIP Cycles Rendering failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [01:12:39             out:             "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;html&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;400 The SSL certificate error&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;body&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;center&gt;&lt;h1&gt;400 Bad Request&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;center&gt;The SSL certificate error&lt;/center&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;hr&gt;&lt;center&gt;openresty&lt;/center&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;/body&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;/html&gt;&lt;13&gt;"]: [The snippet is interesting, because it contains error message]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because problems on Ethel side. subscription is not available 
Resolution: Ping over Slack #ethel team
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
01:12:39             out:             "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;html&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;400 The SSL certificate error&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;body&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;center&gt;&lt;h1&gt;400 Bad Request&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;center&gt;The SSL certificate error&lt;/center&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;hr&gt;&lt;center&gt;openresty&lt;/center&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;/body&gt;&lt;13&gt;",
01:12:39             out:             "&lt;/html&gt;&lt;13&gt;"

Answer: The snippet is interesting, because it contains error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 63bdd99cc0ee493ea8351a7a6e8d0c85 -D /var/lib/mock/make-srpm-method/root -a -u mockbuild --drop-capability=CAP_SYS_ADMIN,CAP_IPC_OWNER,CAP_KILL,CAP_LEASE,CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE,CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE,CAP_NET_BROADCAST,CAP_NET_RAW,CAP_SETGID,CAP_SETPCAP,CAP_SETUID,CAP_SYS_CHROOT,CAP_SYS_NICE,CAP_SYS_PTRACE,CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG,CAP_SYS_RESOURCE,CAP_SYS_BOOT,CAP_AUDIT_WRITE,CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.j35m9oe4:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/fnott.spec']: [Command failed at this location.]


Answer: Issue: The .spec file.
Resolution: Fix the .spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 63bdd99cc0ee493ea8351a7a6e8d0c85 -D /var/lib/mock/make-srpm-method/root -a -u mockbuild --drop-capability=CAP_SYS_ADMIN,CAP_IPC_OWNER,CAP_KILL,CAP_LEASE,CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE,CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE,CAP_NET_BROADCAST,CAP_NET_RAW,CAP_SETGID,CAP_SETPCAP,CAP_SETUID,CAP_SYS_CHROOT,CAP_SYS_NICE,CAP_SYS_PTRACE,CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG,CAP_SYS_RESOURCE,CAP_SYS_BOOT,CAP_AUDIT_WRITE,CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.j35m9oe4:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/fnott.spec'

Answer: Command failed at this location.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/dnf5-5.2.14.0-build/dnf5-git-4045.f33e5c5/dnf5/main.cpp:1211:11: error: ‘set_localw’ is not a member of ‘dnf5’; did you mean ‘set_locale’?
 1211 |     dnf5::set_localw();
      |           ^~~~~~~~~~
      |           set_locale]: [The root cause of the build failure]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/dnf5-5.2.14.0-build/dnf5-git-4045.f33e5c5/dnf5/main.cpp:975:13: error: ‘void dnf5::set_locale()’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
  975 | static void set_locale() {
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors]: [Another error caused by the previous one.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because there is a typo in the code and its not valid.
It tries to use set_localw which doesn't exists and at the same time there is set_locale which is reported as unused.
Resolution: Fix the typo by changing set_localw to set_localw.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/dnf5-5.2.14.0-build/dnf5-git-4045.f33e5c5/dnf5/main.cpp:1211:11: error: ‘set_localw’ is not a member of ‘dnf5’; did you mean ‘set_locale’?
 1211 |     dnf5::set_localw();
      |           ^~~~~~~~~~
      |           set_locale

Answer: The root cause of the build failure
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/dnf5-5.2.14.0-build/dnf5-git-4045.f33e5c5/dnf5/main.cpp:975:13: error: ‘void dnf5::set_locale()’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
  975 | static void set_locale() {
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

Answer: Another error caused by the previous one.