fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
checking for libusb-config... no
checking for usb_init in -lusb... no
configure: error: Unable to find libusb
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3Se0cU (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3Se0cU (%build)

Answer: The configure script complains about missing libusb dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ CC=clang]: [clang has been selected as the default C compiler.]
=============
[+ CXX=clang++]: [clang++ has been selected as the default C++ compiler.]
=============
[gcc -O2 -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg -fstack-protector-strong -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -c -o /tmp/ffconf.iTr4BAq3/test.o /tmp/ffconf.iTr4BAq3/test.c
]: [The package is using gcc to compile a C file.]
=============
[gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg'
]: [This is the error causing the build to fail.]


Answer: Issue: The build fails because the default C compiler for the RPM build has been set to clang, but the package source hard-codes gcc as the C compiler.  This causes the build to fail, because gcc is being passed clang compile flags which it doesn't support.
Resolution: Patch the upstream source code to respect the CC environment variable instead for hard-coding gcc.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ CC=clang

Answer: clang has been selected as the default C compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ CXX=clang++

Answer: clang++ has been selected as the default C++ compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc -O2 -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg -fstack-protector-strong -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -c -o /tmp/ffconf.iTr4BAq3/test.o /tmp/ffconf.iTr4BAq3/test.c


Answer: The package is using gcc to compile a C file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg'


Answer: This is the error causing the build to fail.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Unexpected tokens
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 26 column 11:
  26 |          item (_("_Repeat"), "win.toggle-loop")
     |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called menu
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 14 column 19:
  14 |      menu-model: menu {
     |                  ^^^^
hint: Did you mean `Text`?
suggestion: replace menu with Text

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called section
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 15 column 9:
  15 |        section {
     |        ^^^^^^^
hint: Did you mean `NoSelection`?
suggestion: replace section with NoSelection

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called submenu
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 16 column 11:
  16 |          submenu language_menu {
     |          ^^^^^^^
hint: Did you check your spelling?
hint: Are your dependencies up to date?

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called submenu
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 20 column 11:
  20 |          submenu subtitles_menu {
     |          ^^^^^^^
hint: Did you check your spelling?
hint: Are your dependencies up to date?

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called section
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 25 column 9:
  25 |        section {
     |        ^^^^^^^
hint: Did you mean `NoSelection`?
suggestion: replace section with NoSelection

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called section
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 29 column 9:
  29 |        section {
     |        ^^^^^^^
hint: Did you mean `NoSelection`?
suggestion: replace section with NoSelection

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called item
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 33 column 11:
  33 |          item {
     |          ^^^^
hint: Did you mean `Filter`?
suggestion: replace item with Filter

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called item
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 37 column 11:
  37 |          item {
     |          ^^^^
hint: Did you mean `Filter`?
suggestion: replace item with Filter

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called section
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 42 column 9:
  42 |        section {
     |        ^^^^^^^
hint: Did you mean `NoSelection`?
suggestion: replace section with NoSelection

error: Namespace Gtk does not contain a type called item
at ../showtime/gtk/options.blp line 43 column 11:
  43 |          item {
     |          ^^^^
hint: Did you mean `Filter`?
suggestion: replace item with Filter

11 errors

Answer: These lines show there are multiple errors from the command `blueprint-compiler batch-compile`.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [checking for C++ compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C++ compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.]: [Contains main issue]


Answer: Issue: Because compiler weren't detected.
Resolution: Install toolchain like g++, make and gcc
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
checking for C++ compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C++ compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.

Answer: Contains main issue
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
ERROR: %pyproject_install found no wheel in %{_pyproject_wheeldir} /builddir/build/BUILD/fedora-distro-aliases-git-7.787dd61/pyproject-wheeld]: [The relevant error message]
=============
[
ls: cannot access '/builddir/build/BUILD/fedora-distro-aliases-git-7.787dd61/pyproject-wheeldir/*.whl': No such file or directo]: [Possible cue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the python package didn't generate a wheel archive
Resolution: Edit your specfile and add `%pyproject_wheel` line to the `%build` section.

According to the Python Packaging Guidelines (since 2021 era), this should be the only macro needed during the build phase of the majority of python packages.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ERROR: %pyproject_install found no wheel in %{_pyproject_wheeldir} /builddir/build/BUILD/fedora-distro-aliases-git-7.787dd61/pyproject-wheeld

Answer: The relevant error message
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ls: cannot access '/builddir/build/BUILD/fedora-distro-aliases-git-7.787dd61/pyproject-wheeldir/*.whl': No such file or directo

Answer: Possible cue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur influxdb-3.0.1/influxdb3_process/build.rs i_p/influxdb3_process/build.rs
|--- influxdb-3.0.1/influxdb3_process/build.rs	2025-04-16 19:48:59.000000000 +0000
|+++ i_p/influxdb3_process/build.rs	2025-05-05 16:54:44.634986820 +0000
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored]: [A patch couldn't be applied]
=============
[/usr/bin/patch -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f]: [You can see here, that the patch command was called with --fuzz=0]
=============
[/builddir/build/SOURCES/build_without_git.patch]: [Name of the broken patch file]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because a patch couldn't be applied.

- It can be outdated, from a previous version of the package
- It is possible it applies correctly using the `patch` command, but fails in the RPM build. In that case, the fuzziness is at fault.
Resolution: Update your patch file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur influxdb-3.0.1/influxdb3_process/build.rs i_p/influxdb3_process/build.rs
|--- influxdb-3.0.1/influxdb3_process/build.rs	2025-04-16 19:48:59.000000000 +0000
|+++ i_p/influxdb3_process/build.rs	2025-05-05 16:54:44.634986820 +0000
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Answer: A patch couldn't be applied
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/patch -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f

Answer: You can see here, that the patch command was called with --fuzz=0
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/SOURCES/build_without_git.patch

Answer: Name of the broken patch file
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(hatchling) >= 1.1]: [Package 'hatchling' is not available.]


Answer: Issue: The package depends on 'hatchling' which is not available in the repositories.
Resolution: Ensure the dependency is in repositories before depending on it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(hatchling) >= 1.1

Answer: Package 'hatchling' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Summary of Failures:
 16/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-cpu_queries               ERROR            0.32s   exit status 1
 18/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-pc_cpu_hotplug_props      ERROR            0.19s   exit status 1
 19/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-virtio_version            ERROR            0.29s   exit status 1
 20/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-x86_cpu_model_versions    ERROR            0.46s   exit status 1
 21/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-vnc                       ERROR            0.25s   exit status 1
 23/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-info_usernet              ERROR            0.25s   exit status 1
 24/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-version                   ERROR            0.27s   exit status 1
Ok:                215 
Fail:              7   
Skipped:           6   

Answer: Testsuite summary with fails
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 16/228 test_cpu_queries.QueryCPUModelExpansion.test                      FAIL          
 16/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-cpu_queries               ERROR            0.32s   exit status 1

Answer: failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
▶  18/228 test_pc_cpu_hotplug_props.OmittedCPUProps.test_no_die_id          FAIL          
 18/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-pc_cpu_hotplug_props      ERROR            0.19s   exit status 1

Answer: failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
▶  19/228 test_virtio_version.VirtioVersionCheck.test_conventional_devs     FAIL          
▶  19/228 test_virtio_version.VirtioVersionCheck.test_modern_only_devs      FAIL          
 19/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-virtio_version            ERROR            0.29s   exit status 1

Answer: failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
▶  20/228 test_x86_cpu_model_versions.X86CPUModelAliases.test_none_alias    FAIL          
 20/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-x86_cpu_model_versions    ERROR            0.46s   exit status 1

Answer: failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
▶  21/228 test_vnc.Vnc.test_change_listen                                   FAIL          
▶  21/228 test_vnc.Vnc.test_change_password                                 FAIL          
▶  21/228 test_vnc.Vnc.test_change_password_requires_a_password             FAIL          
▶  21/228 test_vnc.Vnc.test_no_vnc_change_password                          FAIL          
 21/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-vnc                       ERROR            0.25s   exit status 1

Answer: failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
▶  23/228 test_info_usernet.InfoUsernet.test_hostfwd                        FAIL          
 23/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-info_usernet              ERROR            0.25s   exit status 1

Answer: failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
▶  24/228 test_version.Version.test_qmp_human_info_version                  FAIL          
 24/228 qemu:func-quick+func-x86_64 / func-x86_64-version                   ERROR            0.27s   exit status 1

Answer: failed test
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [06:12:53                 out: failed with code 1 and output:
06:12:53                 out: Error: INSTALLATION FAILED: values don't meet the specifications of the schema(s) in the following chart(s):
06:12:53                 out: redhat-postgresql-persistent:
06:12:53                 out: - image.tag: image.tag must be one of the following: "latest", "13-el9", "13-el8", "12-el8", "12"
06:12:53                 out: 
06:12:53                 out: ]: [Image tag does not exist in Helm chart values.json. Look at the definition of values.json file]


Answer: Issue: During the test entered tag is not mentioned in value.json file
Resolution: Add the missing tag into values.json file in Helm chart.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
06:12:53                 out: failed with code 1 and output:
06:12:53                 out: Error: INSTALLATION FAILED: values don't meet the specifications of the schema(s) in the following chart(s):
06:12:53                 out: redhat-postgresql-persistent:
06:12:53                 out: - image.tag: image.tag must be one of the following: "latest", "13-el9", "13-el8", "12-el8", "12"
06:12:53                 out: 
06:12:53                 out: 

Answer: Image tag does not exist in Helm chart values.json. Look at the definition of values.json file
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [meson.build:499:15: ERROR: Dependency "libffado" not found, tried pkgconfig]: [Meson build system reports that a required dependency `libffado` was not found. Compilation of the source can not proceed.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eIaP2Z (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eIaP2Z (%build)]: [General message, indicating that an error has occurred during build. ]


Answer: Issue: One of the dependencies `libffado` was not found during build. Since `libffado` is not an optional dependency, it must be present during compilation.
Resolution: Ensure that package `libaffado` is installed on the build system before attempting another build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meson.build:499:15: ERROR: Dependency "libffado" not found, tried pkgconfig

Answer: Meson build system reports that a required dependency `libffado` was not found. Compilation of the source can not proceed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eIaP2Z (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eIaP2Z (%build)

Answer: General message, indicating that an error has occurred during build.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [6 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_credentials.py.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_signers.py.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_utils.py.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/utils/botocore/__init__.py.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ba6Qwl (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ba6Qwl (%prep)]: [Output from failed patch.]
=============
[ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/awscli2-2.27.0-1.fc43.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 7 seconds]: [Error line indicating which srcrpm failed building.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed because it tried to apply wrong patch.
Resolution: Make sure the patch is correct and up-to-date.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
6 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_credentials.py.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_signers.py.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/botocore/test_utils.py.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/utils/botocore/__init__.py.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ba6Qwl (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ba6Qwl (%prep)

Answer: Output from failed patch.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/awscli2-2.27.0-1.fc43.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 7 seconds

Answer: Error line indicating which srcrpm failed building.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ echo 'Patch #2 (lto_optimization.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz=0
/usr/bin/patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input.]: [The patching failed while trying to apply Patch2.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.P5oDnB (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.P5oDnB (%prep)]: [The build failed during the prep phase.]


Answer: Issue: The Patch2 file is not structured properly o the files being patched are not where they are expected.
Resolution: Review the contents of the lto_optimization.patch file, make sure the files that are supposed to be patched are annotated correctly and are located in the correct directory.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ echo 'Patch #2 (lto_optimization.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz=0
/usr/bin/patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input.

Answer: The patching failed while trying to apply Patch2.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.P5oDnB (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.P5oDnB (%prep)

Answer: The build failed during the prep phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(gix) >= 0.63.0 with crate(gix) < 0.64.0~)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(gix/command) >= 0.63.0 with crate(gix/command) < 0.64.0~)
 Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(gix/revision) >= 0.63.0 with crate(gix/revision) < 0.64.0~)
]: [Here the build fails because dnf can not find the gix crate packaged in version that matches fulfills the version requirements.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because dnf can not find the gix crate packaged in version that matches fulfills the version requirements. The version requirements in Rust packages are generated automatically from the dependencies specified in the upstream Cargo.toml file at build time. 
Resolution: There are two options to fix this: You could change the dependency upstream in Cargo.toml to a version that is packaged in Fedora. Or you could create a patch that changes the dependency version just in Fedora. This patch can be generated by running rust2rpm --patch
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(gix) >= 0.63.0 with crate(gix) < 0.64.0~)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(gix/command) >= 0.63.0 with crate(gix/command) < 0.64.0~)
 Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(gix/revision) >= 0.63.0 with crate(gix/revision) < 0.64.0~)


Answer: Here the build fails because dnf can not find the gix crate packaged in version that matches fulfills the version requirements.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: package rpm-build-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 requires rpm = 4.19.91-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with redhat-rpm-config < 290-1 provided by redhat-rpm-config-288-1.fc40.noarch
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [Message indicating that the requested package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 can not be installed due to conflicts with another, already present, package.]


Answer: Issue: One of the required packages, redhat-rpm-config-288-1.fc40.noarch, was in conflict with an already installed package.
Resolution: Before attempting a build, ensure that no dependencies are in conflict with one another, or with packages installed on the build host.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: package rpm-build-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 requires rpm = 4.19.91-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with redhat-rpm-config < 290-1 provided by redhat-rpm-config-288-1.fc40.noarch
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job

Answer: Message indicating that the requested package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 can not be installed due to conflicts with another, already present, package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.182669.1747427007000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump]
=============
[       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.217751.1747427177000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump]
=============
[       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.218072.1747427191000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump]
=============
[       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.219312.1747427215000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump]
=============
[       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.797628.1747430975000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump]
=============
[       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.831082.1747431126000000.zst (present)]: [Record of tmux core dump]


Answer: Issue: tmux has core-dumped.
Resolution: This is a known issue. Please report the problem to the tmux team in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80294
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.182669.1747427007000000.zst (present)

Answer: Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.217751.1747427177000000.zst (present)

Answer: Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.218072.1747427191000000.zst (present)

Answer: Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.219312.1747427215000000.zst (present)

Answer: Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.797628.1747430975000000.zst (present)

Answer: Record of tmux core dump
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
       Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.tmux:\x20server.0.27216b0eb1a24e3d93204d7a51df83cb.831082.1747431126000000.zst (present)

Answer: Record of tmux core dump
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-avalara-25.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/Avalara-25.1.0.dist-info]: [Contains the path to the missing file.]


Answer: Issue: New Python build tools produce dist-info folders with normalized names of Python packages so the new name of the directory is avalara-25.1.0.dist-info instead of Avalara-25.1.0.dist-info.
Resolution: Rename the expected directory in the specfile or use modern pyproject macros that can handle installed files for you.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-avalara-25.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/Avalara-25.1.0.dist-info

Answer: Contains the path to the missing file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-datanommer-commands-1.3.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/doc/python3-datanommer-commands/NEWS.*]: [Marks RPM build error including which file was not found.]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 60817a74ba3f4a16a53c7b596f2ed5ba -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1744725631.877556/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.v29veni5:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep  --target x86_64 /builddir/build/originals/python-datanommer-commands.spec']: [Marks a command that failed.]
=============
[error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-datanommer-commands-1.3.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/doc/python3-datanommer-commands/NEWS.*]: [Marks which file was not found]
=============
[ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-datanommer-commands-1.3.0-0.fc43.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 18 seconds]: [Marks the error.]


Answer: Issue: There is a missing file.
Resolution: Either correct the path to the file, so it is accurate, or add the file in case it's missing.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-datanommer-commands-1.3.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/doc/python3-datanommer-commands/NEWS.*

Answer: Marks RPM build error including which file was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 60817a74ba3f4a16a53c7b596f2ed5ba -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1744725631.877556/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.v29veni5:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep  --target x86_64 /builddir/build/originals/python-datanommer-commands.spec'

Answer: Marks a command that failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-datanommer-commands-1.3.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/doc/python3-datanommer-commands/NEWS.*

Answer: Marks which file was not found
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-datanommer-commands-1.3.0-0.fc43.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 18 seconds

Answer: Marks the error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'pandoc'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [It is the error that ultimately leads to the build failure]


Answer: Issue: The package "pandoc" is not available on this build OS target.
Resolution: As the OS does not provide "pandoc", you would need to add (and build) your own package of this tool in a COPR repository.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'pandoc'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: It is the error that ultimately leads to the build failure
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    test_utf8 ...                                                       [ERROR]]: [This is a failed test but it does not seem to affect the overall outcome of the build.]
=============
[[ERROR]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/trial/runner.py", line 616, in loadPackage
    module = modinfo.load()
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/python/modules.py", line 393, in load
    return self.pathEntry.pythonPath.moduleLoader(self.name)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/python/reflect.py", line 297, in namedAny
    topLevelPackage = _importAndCheckStack(trialname)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/python/reflect.py", line 238, in _importAndCheckStack
    return __import__(importName)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/conch/test/test_cftp.py", line 96, in <module>
    class ListingTests(TestCase):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/conch/test/test_cftp.py", line 212, in ListingTests
    locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL, currentLocale)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/locale.py", line 615, in setlocale
    return _setlocale(category, locale)]: [This is a traceback of the error showing us where the error originated from and how it propagated throughout the calls.]
=============
[locale.Error: unsupported locale setting]: [The locale setting is not supported.]
=============
[[ERROR]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/trial/_synctest.py", line 1459, in _runCleanups
    f(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/locale.py", line 615, in setlocale
    return _setlocale(category, locale)
locale.Error: unsupported locale setting]: [A failure of the function _setlocale beacuse of setting an unsupported locale.]
=============
[FAILED (skips=1068, errors=2, successes=10323)
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E2gVCY (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E2gVCY (%check)]: [The build failed during the %check part of the build.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because of inputting an unsupported locale into the _setlocale() function during the %check part of the build.
Resolution: Check if the test mentioned in the traceback is setting the correct locale and check if the _setlocale() function checks for a valid locale properly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    test_utf8 ...                                                       [ERROR]

Answer: This is a failed test but it does not seem to affect the overall outcome of the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/trial/runner.py", line 616, in loadPackage
    module = modinfo.load()
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/python/modules.py", line 393, in load
    return self.pathEntry.pythonPath.moduleLoader(self.name)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/python/reflect.py", line 297, in namedAny
    topLevelPackage = _importAndCheckStack(trialname)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/python/reflect.py", line 238, in _importAndCheckStack
    return __import__(importName)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/conch/test/test_cftp.py", line 96, in <module>
    class ListingTests(TestCase):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/conch/test/test_cftp.py", line 212, in ListingTests
    locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL, currentLocale)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/locale.py", line 615, in setlocale
    return _setlocale(category, locale)

Answer: This is a traceback of the error showing us where the error originated from and how it propagated throughout the calls.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
locale.Error: unsupported locale setting

Answer: The locale setting is not supported.