fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M', '78ee3ad797934bc8810467f68a13483c', '-D', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750072132.132465/root', '-a', '-u', 'mockbuild', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', '--rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', '--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.rwsw4_o9:/etc/resolv.conf', '--bind=/dev/btrfs-control', '--bind=/dev/mapper/control', '--bind=/dev/fuse', '--bind=/dev/loop-control', '--bind=/dev/loop0', '--bind=/dev/loop1', '--bind=/dev/loop2', '--bind=/dev/loop3', '--bind=/dev/loop4', '--bind=/dev/loop5', '--bind=/dev/loop6', '--bind=/dev/loop7', '--bind=/dev/loop8', '--bind=/dev/loop9', '--bind=/dev/loop10', '--bind=/dev/loop11', '--console=pipe', '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME=/builddir', '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', 'bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/python-idds-common.spec'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False


Answer: Due to the missing packages systemd-nspawn is unable to spin up the virtual container, hence deployment fails.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [npm error code ENOTFOUND
npm error syscall getaddrinfo
npm error errno ENOTFOUND
npm error network request to https://registry.npmjs.org/@babel%2fcore failed, reason: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND registry.npmjs.org
npm error network This is a problem related to network connectivity.
npm error network In most cases you are behind a proxy or have bad network settings.
npm error network
npm error network If you are behind a proxy, please make sure that the
npm error network 'proxy' config is set properly.  See: 'npm help config']: [Request to npm repository has failed.]


Answer: Issue: The request to npm package repository has failed, causing build failure, as necessary dependencies couldn't be installed.
Resolution: Ensure that your network connection is fully functional and that the npm repository is online and reachable from you region. It is possible that you have problems with network settings.

Misconfigured proxy, VPN or firewall could be the issue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
npm error code ENOTFOUND
npm error syscall getaddrinfo
npm error errno ENOTFOUND
npm error network request to https://registry.npmjs.org/@babel%2fcore failed, reason: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND registry.npmjs.org
npm error network This is a problem related to network connectivity.
npm error network In most cases you are behind a proxy or have bad network settings.
npm error network
npm error network If you are behind a proxy, please make sure that the
npm error network 'proxy' config is set properly.  See: 'npm help config'

Answer: Request to npm repository has failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [gmake[2]: *** [vendor/CMakeFiles/libadb.dir/build.make:78: vendor/app_processes.pb.h] Error 1]: [Build has failed on line 78 of the `vendor/CMakeFiles/libadb.dir/build.make` while working with `vendor/app_processes.pb.h` source file, with code 1.]
=============
[gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.]: [Unfinished jobs of the build are still continuing. ]
=============
[gmake: *** [Makefile:159: all] Error 2]: [Program `gmake` exited with code 2, indicating error. This happened while working on target `all` in the file `Makefile` on line 159.]
=============
[ # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 971615ef9ea540b5aab33085b8645de6 -D /var/lib/mock/rhel+epel-9-x86_64-1741087988.628519/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.1jxg69c3:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/android-tools.spec']: [General error indicating build failure.]
=============
[app_processes.proto: This file contains proto3 optional fields, but --experimental_allow_proto3_optional was not set.]: [File `app_process.proto` contains proto3 optional fields, but flag allowing these fields `--experimental_allow_proto3_optional` was not set.]


Answer: Issue: File `app_process.proto` contained fields not supported by default flags used for build.
Resolution: Rerun the build with appropriate flags set, or make sure that all source files contain only supported features. In this case `app_process.proto` contained fields that are only supported by `--experimental_allow_proto3_optional` flag. Without it, the fields are not allowed.

Alternatively you can modify the file `app_process.proto` so it doesn't contain prohibited fields.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gmake[2]: *** [vendor/CMakeFiles/libadb.dir/build.make:78: vendor/app_processes.pb.h] Error 1

Answer: Build has failed on line 78 of the `vendor/CMakeFiles/libadb.dir/build.make` while working with `vendor/app_processes.pb.h` source file, with code 1.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.

Answer: Unfinished jobs of the build are still continuing.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gmake: *** [Makefile:159: all] Error 2

Answer: Program `gmake` exited with code 2, indicating error. This happened while working on target `all` in the file `Makefile` on line 159.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 971615ef9ea540b5aab33085b8645de6 -D /var/lib/mock/rhel+epel-9-x86_64-1741087988.628519/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.1jxg69c3:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/android-tools.spec'

Answer: General error indicating build failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
app_processes.proto: This file contains proto3 optional fields, but --experimental_allow_proto3_optional was not set.

Answer: File `app_process.proto` contains proto3 optional fields, but flag allowing these fields `--experimental_allow_proto3_optional` was not set.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: candidate 1: ‘operator==(int, int)’ (built-in)
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘const vk::CuModuleNVX’ to ‘int’
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: candidate 2: ‘operator==(int, long long unsigned int)’ (built-in)
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘const vk::CuModuleNVX’ to ‘long long unsigned int’
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: candidate 3: ‘operator==(long long unsigned int, int)’ (built-in)
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘const vk::CuModuleNVX’ to ‘int’
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: candidate 4: ‘operator==(long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int)’ (built-in)
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘const vk::CuModuleNVX’ to ‘long long unsigned int’
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan.hpp:203:8: note: candidate 5: ‘template<unsigned int N, unsigned int M> bool vk::operator==(const ArrayWrapper1D<char, N>&, const ArrayWrapper1D<char, M>&)’
]: [This is reference to 64bits structure that cannot be satisfied on 32bit system.]


Answer: Issue: The sources uses 64bit code that cannot be build for 32 bit system.
Resolution: Stop building for i386 by adding this to SPEC file:

  ExcludeArch: %{ix86}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: candidate 1: ‘operator==(int, int)’ (built-in)
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘const vk::CuModuleNVX’ to ‘int’
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: candidate 2: ‘operator==(int, long long unsigned int)’ (built-in)
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘const vk::CuModuleNVX’ to ‘long long unsigned int’
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: candidate 3: ‘operator==(long long unsigned int, int)’ (built-in)
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘const vk::CuModuleNVX’ to ‘int’
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: candidate 4: ‘operator==(long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int)’ (built-in)
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan_structs.hpp:20196:75: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from ‘const vk::CuModuleNVX’ to ‘long long unsigned int’
/usr/include/vulkan/vulkan.hpp:203:8: note: candidate 5: ‘template<unsigned int N, unsigned int M> bool vk::operator==(const ArrayWrapper1D<char, N>&, const ArrayWrapper1D<char, M>&)’


Answer: This is reference to 64bits structure that cannot be satisfied on 32bit system.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [============================================================================
Testsuite summary for genimage 18
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 57
# PASS:  44
# SKIP:  11
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 1]: [testsuite result summary]
=============
[ERROR: test/filesystem.test - exited with status 1]: [test with error state]
=============
[FAIL: test/filesystem.test 2 - cramfs]: [test with failed state]


Answer: Issue: Testsuite ended with one failed and one test in error state 
Resolution: Check test results and fix either code or test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for genimage 18
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 57
# PASS:  44
# SKIP:  11
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 1

Answer: testsuite result summary
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: test/filesystem.test - exited with status 1

Answer: test with error state
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: test/filesystem.test 2 - cramfs

Answer: test with failed state
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Patch #503 (expat-CVE-2022-25315.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #503 (expat-CVE-2022-25315.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .expat-CVE-2022-25315 --fuzz=2
patching file parser/expat/lib/xmlparse.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2491 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2491.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file parser/expat/lib/xmlparse.c.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ygjz40 (%prep)]: [This snippet contains the relevant lines where the build failed. Applying patch #503 (expat-CVE-2022-25315.patch) to the sources failed.]


Answer: Issue: The patch expat-CVE-2022-25315.patch could not be applied because the source portion where it is to be applied to changed at line 2491 or following.
Resolution: Inspect the new source code and determine differences to the source code context in the patch. It could be a source code line changed that is to be removed with the patch, or the surrounding context lines were altered.
The patch needs to be adapted to the changes and regenerated and the resulting file be added to dist-git.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Patch #503 (expat-CVE-2022-25315.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #503 (expat-CVE-2022-25315.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .expat-CVE-2022-25315 --fuzz=2
patching file parser/expat/lib/xmlparse.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2491 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2491.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file parser/expat/lib/xmlparse.c.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ygjz40 (%prep)

Answer: This snippet contains the relevant lines where the build failed. Applying patch #503 (expat-CVE-2022-25315.patch) to the sources failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWpyzw (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWpyzw (%build)
Child return code was: 1


Answer: The build failed in %build section.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kWIUH3 (%check)]: [This indicates that the package build failed in the %check section. It means that package has got likely upstream tests running, and some of that tests failed.]
=============
[Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault]: [Segmentation fault is a fatal error that made the package build unsuccessful.]
=============
[tests/test_command.py F.FFF.FF.F.F.....FF....                            [  3%]]: [A bunch of capital letter Fs show that some tests have run and failed. This would invalidate the build.]
=============
[Extension modules: numpy._core._multiarray_umath, numpy.linalg._umath_linalg, numpy.random._common, numpy.random.bit_generator, numpy.random._bounded_integers, numpy.random._mt19937, numpy.random.mtrand, numpy.random._philox, numpy.random._pcg64, numpy.random._sfc64, numpy.random._generator, pandas._libs.tslibs.ccalendar, pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime, pandas._libs.tslibs.dtypes, pandas._libs.tslibs.base, pandas._libs.tslibs.nattype, pandas._libs.tslibs.timezones, pandas._libs.tslibs.fields, pandas._libs.tslibs.timedeltas, pandas._libs.tslibs.tzconversion, pandas._libs.tslibs.timestamps, pandas._libs.properties, pandas._libs.tslibs.offsets, pandas._libs.tslibs.strptime, pandas._libs.tslibs.parsing, pandas._libs.tslibs.conversion, pandas._libs.tslibs.period, pandas._libs.tslibs.vectorized, pandas._libs.ops_dispatch, pandas._libs.missing, pandas._libs.hashtable, pandas._libs.algos, pandas._libs.interval, pandas._libs.lib, pandas._libs.ops, pandas._libs.hashing, pandas._libs.arrays, pandas._libs.tslib, pandas._libs.sparse, pandas._libs.internals, pandas._libs.indexing, pandas._libs.index, pandas._libs.writers, pandas._libs.join, pandas._libs.window.aggregations, pandas._libs.window.indexers, pandas._libs.reshape, pandas._libs.groupby, pandas._libs.json, pandas._libs.parsers, pandas._libs.testing, yaml._yaml (total: 52)]: [There is a list of extension modules that were loaded during the interpreter crash. It can help when looking for a root cause of the failure.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because of a segmentation error. This most likely comes from incompatible libraries or a bug in this package.
Resolution: To fix the build, it is first necessary to review the extension modules used by the package. Most probably one or more of them are not compatible with the recent Python version and need to be fixed or rebuilt with it. When all of the libraries are rebuilt with the most recent Python version, this build should be retriggered. Then, the traceback of the failed tests will appear which will have to be fixed too.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kWIUH3 (%check)

Answer: This indicates that the package build failed in the %check section. It means that package has got likely upstream tests running, and some of that tests failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault

Answer: Segmentation fault is a fatal error that made the package build unsuccessful.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tests/test_command.py F.FFF.FF.F.F.....FF....                            [  3%]

Answer: A bunch of capital letter Fs show that some tests have run and failed. This would invalidate the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Extension modules: numpy._core._multiarray_umath, numpy.linalg._umath_linalg, numpy.random._common, numpy.random.bit_generator, numpy.random._bounded_integers, numpy.random._mt19937, numpy.random.mtrand, numpy.random._philox, numpy.random._pcg64, numpy.random._sfc64, numpy.random._generator, pandas._libs.tslibs.ccalendar, pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime, pandas._libs.tslibs.dtypes, pandas._libs.tslibs.base, pandas._libs.tslibs.nattype, pandas._libs.tslibs.timezones, pandas._libs.tslibs.fields, pandas._libs.tslibs.timedeltas, pandas._libs.tslibs.tzconversion, pandas._libs.tslibs.timestamps, pandas._libs.properties, pandas._libs.tslibs.offsets, pandas._libs.tslibs.strptime, pandas._libs.tslibs.parsing, pandas._libs.tslibs.conversion, pandas._libs.tslibs.period, pandas._libs.tslibs.vectorized, pandas._libs.ops_dispatch, pandas._libs.missing, pandas._libs.hashtable, pandas._libs.algos, pandas._libs.interval, pandas._libs.lib, pandas._libs.ops, pandas._libs.hashing, pandas._libs.arrays, pandas._libs.tslib, pandas._libs.sparse, pandas._libs.internals, pandas._libs.indexing, pandas._libs.index, pandas._libs.writers, pandas._libs.join, pandas._libs.window.aggregations, pandas._libs.window.indexers, pandas._libs.reshape, pandas._libs.groupby, pandas._libs.json, pandas._libs.parsers, pandas._libs.testing, yaml._yaml (total: 52)

Answer: There is a list of extension modules that were loaded during the interpreter crash. It can help when looking for a root cause of the failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: attempt to use unversioned python, define %__python to /usr/bin/python2 or /usr/bin/python3 explicitly
]: [rpmbuild complains about python and exits]


Answer: Issue: rpmbuild requires usage of versioned python shebangs
Resolution: check python files and use versioned python shebangs
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: attempt to use unversioned python, define %__python to /usr/bin/python2 or /usr/bin/python3 explicitly


Answer: rpmbuild complains about python and exits
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/python3.12 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3.12 -sP'
/usr/bin/python3.12: can't open file '/builddir/build/BUILD/sniffio-1.3.1/setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
]: [execution of setup.py build failing to find the setup.py file in the sources directory]


Answer: Issue: setup.py is no longer present in the project as the developers migrated setup.py to pyproject.toml
Resolution: Migrate the RPM spec to use pyproject-rpm-macros to build the project using pyproject.toml.
https://github.com/hroncok/pyprojectize could also be used to automatically do the needed changes in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/python3.12 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3.12 -sP'
/usr/bin/python3.12: can't open file '/builddir/build/BUILD/sniffio-1.3.1/setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory


Answer: execution of setup.py build failing to find the setup.py file in the sources directory
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [gcc -I. -I../../include -fPIC -fcommon -DNO_DB -DHAS_LDAP -DLDAP_DEPRECATED=1 -DUSE_LDAP_SASL -DHAS_LMDB -DHAS_PCRE=2 -DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/include/mysql -DHAS_PGSQL -I/usr/include/pgsql -DHAS_SQLITE -DHAS_CDB -DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -I/usr/include/sasl -DUSE_TLS -DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=\"/etc/postfix\" -DNO_NIS -DHAS_DEV_URANDOM -DUSE_DYNAMIC_LIBS -DUSE_DYNAMIC_MAPS -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -Wno-comment -fno-common -fPIC  -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64-v3 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-comment -I. -I../../include -DLINUX6 -c bounce.c
In file included from bounce.c:210:
./mail_params.h:17:13: error: ‘bool’ cannot be defined via ‘typedef’
   17 | typedef int bool;
      |             ^~~~
./mail_params.h:17:13: note: ‘bool’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
]: [It's a compilation error.]


Answer: Issue: GCC 15 moved a default C language version to to C23. That version has a built-in "bool" keyword, therefore a C code is allowed to defined a custom type of the same name.
Resolution: Change to code not to define bool type in case of C23 or higher language standard is used.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc -I. -I../../include -fPIC -fcommon -DNO_DB -DHAS_LDAP -DLDAP_DEPRECATED=1 -DUSE_LDAP_SASL -DHAS_LMDB -DHAS_PCRE=2 -DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/include/mysql -DHAS_PGSQL -I/usr/include/pgsql -DHAS_SQLITE -DHAS_CDB -DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -I/usr/include/sasl -DUSE_TLS -DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=\"/etc/postfix\" -DNO_NIS -DHAS_DEV_URANDOM -DUSE_DYNAMIC_LIBS -DUSE_DYNAMIC_MAPS -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -Wno-comment -fno-common -fPIC  -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64-v3 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-comment -I. -I../../include -DLINUX6 -c bounce.c
In file included from bounce.c:210:
./mail_params.h:17:13: error: ‘bool’ cannot be defined via ‘typedef’
   17 | typedef int bool;
      |             ^~~~
./mail_params.h:17:13: note: ‘bool’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards


Answer: It's a compilation error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
#   Failed test 'did not search PATH for C++ compiler when given absolute path to C compiler'
#   at t/03-cplusplus.t line 73.
#          got: 'g++'
#     expected: '/builddir/build/BUILD/perl-5.41.13-build/perl-5.41.12/dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/some/directory/what/doesnt/exist/cc'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
../dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/t/03-cplusplus.t ........................... 
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/7 subtests ]: [Here build failed, because test got different result as expected]


Answer: Issue: The test failed because it did not expect $ENV{CXX}, and consequently $cb->{config}{cxx}, to be defined at runtime.
https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/23277
Resolution: There are two way how to solve it.
The test should be skipped entirely if $CXX is set, or $CXX needs to be (temporarily) unset.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

#   Failed test 'did not search PATH for C++ compiler when given absolute path to C compiler'
#   at t/03-cplusplus.t line 73.
#          got: 'g++'
#     expected: '/builddir/build/BUILD/perl-5.41.13-build/perl-5.41.12/dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/some/directory/what/doesnt/exist/cc'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
../dist/ExtUtils-CBuilder/t/03-cplusplus.t ........................... 
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/7 subtests 

Answer: Here build failed, because test got different result as expected
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3-pytest-asyncio >= 0.24
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
]: [The required package python3-pytest-asyncio is either not available or is not available in required version.]


Answer: Issue: The build dependency cannot be satisfied.
Resolution: You have to work with the maintainer of python3-pytest-asyncio to build it in the required version.
As a temporary solution, you can disable the test suite.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3-pytest-asyncio >= 0.24
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages


Answer: The required package python3-pytest-asyncio is either not available or is not available in required version.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mailcap']: [The module mailcap which is trying to be imported was not found.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6Zl7m0 (%check)]: [The build failed in the %check part of the build process.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the mailcap module that is trying to be imported is not found, this is because the mailcap module was deprecated in python 3.11 and removed in python 3.13 adn this build is being built using python 3.13.
Resolution: Switch to the alternative of the mailcap module which is the mimetypes module or use an older version of python to build the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mailcap'

Answer: The module mailcap which is trying to be imported was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6Zl7m0 (%check)

Answer: The build failed in the %check part of the build process.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    %changelog not in descending chronological order
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/adelsystem_cbi.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/apc_modbus.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/asem.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/generic_modbus.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/huawei-ups2000.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/phoenixcontact_modbus.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/pijuice.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/socomec_jbus.8.gz
Child return code was: 1
]: [rmbuild complains about files not found]


Answer: Issue: build failed as spec file says that build should have created these files, but they weren't.
Resolution: This may be caused by rebase to new upstream version that removed or renamed some files or some change in build environment, where some build dependency may be missing. Consult with changelog and configure script where it does not find some requirement.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    %changelog not in descending chronological order
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/adelsystem_cbi.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/apc_modbus.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/asem.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/generic_modbus.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/huawei-ups2000.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/phoenixcontact_modbus.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/pijuice.8.gz
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nut-2.8.1-2.el9.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/socomec_jbus.8.gz
Child return code was: 1


Answer: rmbuild complains about files not found
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [y                                  45 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Additional repo https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_or 104 kB/s | 3.8 kB     00:00    
Additional repo https_download_copr_fedorainfra 100 kB/s | 3.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN BaseOS - Developmental packages fo  68 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN AppStream - Developmental packages  66 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN CodeReady Linux Builders - Build p  66 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-mmgu1jug/perl-FileHandle-Fmode/perl-FileHandle-Fmode.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 1 minutes 34 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 77fb7256ea894b5a9d9b7112ce42a363 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1706200861.636798/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.q00l_rzh:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>]: [This is one of the three attempts Mock does to install the BuildRequires specified in spec file. All of the three attempts failed to install `clang-rpm-macros` which runtime-depends on `clang = 13.0.0`.  But no package providing this exists.]


Answer: Issue: Because the BuildRequires aren't installable.
Resolution: Fix the `clang` or `clang-rpm-macros` package. If you don't have permissions to do this, ask the corresponding maintainer. This failure is not your fault.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
y                                  45 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Additional repo https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_or 104 kB/s | 3.8 kB     00:00    
Additional repo https_download_copr_fedorainfra 100 kB/s | 3.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN BaseOS - Developmental packages fo  68 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN AppStream - Developmental packages  66 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN CodeReady Linux Builders - Build p  66 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-mmgu1jug/perl-FileHandle-Fmode/perl-FileHandle-Fmode.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 1 minutes 34 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 77fb7256ea894b5a9d9b7112ce42a363 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1706200861.636798/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.q00l_rzh:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706200861.636798/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>

Answer: This is one of the three attempts Mock does to install the BuildRequires specified in spec file. All of the three attempts failed to install `clang-rpm-macros` which runtime-depends on `clang = 13.0.0`.  But no package providing this exists.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ 'chroot': 'centos-stream-9-x86_64',]: [This build is using a CentOS Stream chroot.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'system-bookmarks']: [There is a missing dependency.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to a missing dependency.  Some dependencies in CentOS Stream are buildroot only, so they are not present in the default repositories that COPR uses for CentOS Stream.
Resolution: You need to manually add the CentOS Stream buildroot repositories from CentOS Stream koji to the additional repos for your CentOS stream chroots.  Here is a template for the repo url: https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/kojifiles/repos/c{centos_version}s-build/latest/{arch}/"
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 'chroot': 'centos-stream-9-x86_64',

Answer: This build is using a CentOS Stream chroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'system-bookmarks'

Answer: There is a missing dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[javac] error: Source option 1.3 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later./builddir/build/BUILD/bsf-2.4.0-build/bsf-2.4.0/build.xml:219: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.]: [Ant build failure related to javac tool.]


Answer: Issue: The version of javac used during the build does not support the source flag 1.3.
Resolution: Inspect the build.xml file and set the appropriate key referring to the java source flag to a version supported by the compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[javac] error: Source option 1.3 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later./builddir/build/BUILD/bsf-2.4.0-build/bsf-2.4.0/build.xml:219: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.

Answer: Ant build failure related to javac tool.