fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/python3 -Bs /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py --generate-extras --python3_pkgversion 3 --wheeldir /builddir/build/BUILD/python-music21-9.5.0-build/music21-9.5.0/pyproject-wheeldir --output /builddir/build/BUILD/python-music21-9.5.0-build/python-music21-9.5.0-1.fc43.x86_64-pyproject-buildrequires -t]: [This snipped describes an invocation to generate build requirements for the package from the built wheel metadata. It contains a flag "-t" which adds the tox configuration to the build.]
=============
[LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.]: [The tox configuration file couldn't be located, hence the LookupError is raised.]


Answer: Issue: The package configures fetching additional test build requirements from tox configuration, but it doesn't provide a configuration file from which it's possible to read the requirements.
Resolution: It should be ensured that tox configuration file is present in the sdist. If the package doesn't use tox, the "-t" flag from the generate_buildrequires.py invocation should be removed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/python3 -Bs /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py --generate-extras --python3_pkgversion 3 --wheeldir /builddir/build/BUILD/python-music21-9.5.0-build/music21-9.5.0/pyproject-wheeldir --output /builddir/build/BUILD/python-music21-9.5.0-build/python-music21-9.5.0-1.fc43.x86_64-pyproject-buildrequires -t

Answer: This snipped describes an invocation to generate build requirements for the package from the built wheel metadata. It contains a flag "-t" which adds the tox configuration to the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.

Answer: The tox configuration file couldn't be located, hence the LookupError is raised.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [exportfs.c: In function ‘release_lockfile’:
exportfs.c:83:17: error: ignoring return value of ‘lockf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result]
   83 |                 lockf(_lockfd, F_ULOCK, 0);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
exportfs.c: In function ‘grab_lockfile’:
exportfs.c:77:17: error: ignoring return value of ‘lockf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result]
   77 |                 lockf(_lockfd, F_LOCK, 0);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
]: [Error message from the compiler]


Answer: Issue: Compiler checks unused return value from a function. [-Werror=unused-result]
Resolution: Don't ignore the return value from a function. Or define function as returning no value.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
exportfs.c: In function ‘release_lockfile’:
exportfs.c:83:17: error: ignoring return value of ‘lockf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result]
   83 |                 lockf(_lockfd, F_ULOCK, 0);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
exportfs.c: In function ‘grab_lockfile’:
exportfs.c:77:17: error: ignoring return value of ‘lockf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result]
   77 |                 lockf(_lockfd, F_LOCK, 0);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


Answer: Error message from the compiler
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [meson.build:443:0: ERROR: Program 'gi-docgen' not found or not executable]: [Description of build failure.]


Answer: Issue: Missing gi-docgen dependency.
Resolution: Add gi-docgen package as BuildRequire to your SPEC file or try to build package without this requirement.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meson.build:443:0: ERROR: Program 'gi-docgen' not found or not executable

Answer: Description of build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'rust >= 1.86'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [It shows the error message which caused the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: Because some package dependencies were not installed, as they were not found.
Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies needed by the package are installable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'rust >= 1.86'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: It shows the error message which caused the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Can't locate Sub/Name.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Sub::Name module) (@INC entries checked: /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/arch /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.40 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.40 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib/Moose/Meta/Method/VariantTable.pm line 11.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib/Moose/Meta/Method/VariantTable.pm line 11.
Compilation failed in require at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib/MooseX/Types/VariantTable/Declare.pm line 17.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib/MooseX/Types/VariantTable/Declare.pm line 17.
Compilation failed in require at t/sugar.t line 24.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/sugar.t line 24.
t/sugar.t ....... skipped: (no reason given)]: [t/sugar.t test failed.]


Answer: Issue: Moose::Meta::Method::VariantTable module attempted to load Sub::Name module. That failed because the module is not installed.
Resolution: Declare a build-time dependency on "perl(Sub::Name)" in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Can't locate Sub/Name.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Sub::Name module) (@INC entries checked: /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/arch /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.40 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.40 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib/Moose/Meta/Method/VariantTable.pm line 11.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib/Moose/Meta/Method/VariantTable.pm line 11.
Compilation failed in require at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib/MooseX/Types/VariantTable/Declare.pm line 17.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04-build/MooseX-Types-VariantTable-0.04/blib/lib/MooseX/Types/VariantTable/Declare.pm line 17.
Compilation failed in require at t/sugar.t line 24.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/sugar.t line 24.
t/sugar.t ....... skipped: (no reason given)

Answer: t/sugar.t test failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.16.0-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-devel-3.13.0-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
Package "python3-packaging-24.1-2.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pip-24.2-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-poetry-core-1.9.1-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(cryptography) < 37~~ with python3dist(cryptography) >= 36)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(delta-spark) < 3.3~~ with python3dist(delta-spark) >= 3.2.1)
 Problem 3: nothing provides requested (python3dist(hadoop-fs-wrapper) < 0.8~~ with python3dist(hadoop-fs-wrapper) >= 0.7)]: [DNF failed to resolve all dependencies. 
Specifically, following constraints were impossible to satisfy:
(python3dist(cryptography) < 37~~ with python3dist(cryptography) >= 36)
(python3dist(delta-spark) < 3.3~~ with python3dist(delta-spark) >= 3.2.1)
(python3dist(hadoop-fs-wrapper) < 0.8~~ with python3dist(hadoop-fs-wrapper) >= 0.7)
]


Answer: Issue: Multiple dependency constraints were impossible to satisfy. Leading to build failure.
Resolution: Ensure that all dependency constraints can be satisfied before initializing build process.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.16.0-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-devel-3.13.0-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
Package "python3-packaging-24.1-2.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pip-24.2-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-poetry-core-1.9.1-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(cryptography) < 37~~ with python3dist(cryptography) >= 36)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(delta-spark) < 3.3~~ with python3dist(delta-spark) >= 3.2.1)
 Problem 3: nothing provides requested (python3dist(hadoop-fs-wrapper) < 0.8~~ with python3dist(hadoop-fs-wrapper) >= 0.7)

Answer: DNF failed to resolve all dependencies. 
Specifically, following constraints were impossible to satisfy:
(python3dist(cryptography) < 37~~ with python3dist(cryptography) >= 36)
(python3dist(delta-spark) < 3.3~~ with python3dist(delta-spark) >= 3.2.1)
(python3dist(hadoop-fs-wrapper) < 0.8~~ with python3dist(hadoop-fs-wrapper) >= 0.7)
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 openssl-libs                     x86_64 1:3.1.4-1.fc40             fedora       7.8 Mi

Answer: This line indicate that openssl 3.1.4 is used.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -I.. -I./src/sss_client -I./src -I. -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/libnl3 -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib64\" -DVARDIR=\"/var\" -DRUNDIR=\"/run\" -DSSS_STATEDIR=\"/var/lib/sss\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -DSHLIBEXT=\"\" -DSSSDDATADIR=\"/usr/share/sssd\" -DSSSD_LIBEXEC_PATH=\"/usr/libexec/sssd\" -DSSSD_CONF_DIR=\"/etc/sssd\" -DSSS_NSS_MCACHE_DIR=\"/var/lib/sss/mc\" -DSSS_NSS_SOCKET_NAME=\"/var/lib/sss/pipes/nss\" -DSSS_PAM_SOCKET_NAME=\"/var/lib/sss/pipes/pam\" -DSSS_PAC_SOCKET_NAME=\"/var/lib/sss/pipes/pac\" -DSSS_PAM_PRIV_SOCKET_NAME=\"/var/lib/sss/pipes/private/pam\" -DSSS_SUDO_SOCKET_NAME=\"/var/lib/sss/pipes/sudo\" -DSSS_AUTOFS_SOCKET_NAME=\"/var/lib/sss/pipes/autofs\" -DSSS_SSH_SOCKET_NAME=\"/var/lib/sss/pipes/ssh\" -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DBASE_FILE_STEM=\"pam_sss\" -Wall -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wundef -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -c src/sss_client/pam_sss.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o src/sss_client/.libs/pam_sss.o
In file included from src/sss_client/pam_sss.c:41:
/usr/include/gdm/gdm-pam-extensions.h:24:10: fatal error: gdm-choice-list-pam-extension.h: No such file or directory
   24 | #include "gdm-choice-list-pam-extension.h"
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated

Answer: This is the reason for failure. It is due to a missing header file: `gdm-choice-list-pam-extension.h`. This file is expected to be part of the GDM (GNOME Display Manager) development package but is not found in the standard include directories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/pytest
============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.13.3, pytest-8.3.5, pluggy-1.5.0
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-partd-1.4.2-build/partd-1.4.2
configfile: pyproject.toml
collected 56 items

partd/tests/test_buffer.py ...                                           [  5%]
partd/tests/test_compressed.py ..                                        [  8%]
partd/tests/test_dict.py ....                                            [ 16%]
partd/tests/test_encode.py ..                                            [ 19%]
partd/tests/test_file.py .......                                         [ 32%]
partd/tests/test_numpy.py .......                                        [ 44%]
partd/tests/test_pandas.py ..............s                               [ 71%]
partd/tests/test_partd.py ....                                           [ 78%]
partd/tests/test_pickle.py ..                                            [ 82%]
partd/tests/test_python.py .                                             [ 83%]
partd/tests/test_utils.py ..                                             [ 87%]
partd/tests/test_zmq.py . !! Copr timeout => sending INT
Copr build error: Build failed]: [It shows the progress of tests run.]


Answer: Issue: There seems to be a problem causing the tests to get stuck, and then the build reached the limit of 5 hours and got killed by COPR.
Resolution: Find the test that hangs and figure out what is wrong with it, or skip it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/pytest
============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.13.3, pytest-8.3.5, pluggy-1.5.0
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-partd-1.4.2-build/partd-1.4.2
configfile: pyproject.toml
collected 56 items

partd/tests/test_buffer.py ...                                           [  5%]
partd/tests/test_compressed.py ..                                        [  8%]
partd/tests/test_dict.py ....                                            [ 16%]
partd/tests/test_encode.py ..                                            [ 19%]
partd/tests/test_file.py .......                                         [ 32%]
partd/tests/test_numpy.py .......                                        [ 44%]
partd/tests/test_pandas.py ..............s                               [ 71%]
partd/tests/test_partd.py ....                                           [ 78%]
partd/tests/test_pickle.py ..                                            [ 82%]
partd/tests/test_python.py .                                             [ 83%]
partd/tests/test_utils.py ..                                             [ 87%]
partd/tests/test_zmq.py . !! Copr timeout => sending INT
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: It shows the progress of tests run.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.el8.s390x.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.el8.s390x.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254]: [Multiple files were installed by the package but not tracked by the package manager.]
=============
[sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory]: [Attempts to use `/usr/bin/python3.12` binary were not successful, as it was not installed.]


Answer: Issue: Some of the files installed by the package were not properly tracked. This can cause conflicts when installing other packages, issues during upgrades, and make safe removal of the files impossible.
Resolution: Ensure that all files installed by the package, no matter their source and destination, are tracked.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.el8.s390x.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.el8.s390x.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254

Answer: Multiple files were installed by the package but not tracked by the package manager.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python3.12: No such file or directory

Answer: Attempts to use `/usr/bin/python3.12` binary were not successful, as it was not installed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [flist.c:2787:55: error: passing argument 4 of ‘qsort’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
 2787 |                       sizeof the_fattr_list.files[0], (int (*)())fattr_compare);
      |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                       |
      |                                                       int (*)(void)
In file included from rsync.h:330:]: [Description of a compilation error.]


Answer: Issue: Incompatible pointer type insertion, likely due to the updated gcc standard
Resolution: Correct the used types in the source code according to the compilers suggestion
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
flist.c:2787:55: error: passing argument 4 of ‘qsort’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
 2787 |                       sizeof the_fattr_list.files[0], (int (*)())fattr_compare);
      |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                       |
      |                                                       int (*)(void)
In file included from rsync.h:330:

Answer: Description of a compilation error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wNPS2P (%build)


Answer: The failure happened in %build phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'types.GenericAlias' and 'NoneType']: [this is the summary line of the exception that got thrown during unit testing which broke the build]


Answer: Issue: Python 3.9 does not support the used typing syntax
Resolution: move to a typing syntax supported by Python 3.9
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'types.GenericAlias' and 'NoneType'

Answer: this is the summary line of the exception that got thrown during unit testing which broke the build
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.taDLCp (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.taDLCp (%build)
]: [The build failed in %build phase.]
=============
[*** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from gettext version 0.20 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.22
make[2]: *** [Makefile:248: stamp-po] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:419: all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:360: all] Error 2]: [You are using macros from autotools 0.22 but gettext is in version 0.20.]


Answer: Issue: There is mismatch in generated Makefile.in.in and available gettext version.
Resolution: You can fix it by forcing updating gettext data at the beginning of the %build section. Put at the top of the %build section following line:

gettextize -f
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.taDLCp (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.taDLCp (%build)


Answer: The build failed in %build phase.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
*** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from gettext version 0.20 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.22
make[2]: *** [Makefile:248: stamp-po] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:419: all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:360: all] Error 2

Answer: You are using macros from autotools 0.22 but gettext is in version 0.20.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(flit-core) < 4~~ with python3dist(flit-core) >= 3.12)
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s]: [The DNF5 command fails since there is a dependency which is not available from any source]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M cbe9e2faae7f43b6ad0663fdc55b13bc -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-bootstrap-1746776964.163860/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.msb6yihu:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-1746776964.163860/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-1746776964.163860/root/ --releasever 42 '/var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-1746776964.163860/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/python-stestr-4.2.0-1.fc42~bootstrap.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm' --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts]: [The container is unable to spawn, because a required package is missing  python3dist(flit-core).]


Answer: Issue: Missing package as dependency, (python3dist(flit-core) < 4~~ with python3dist(flit-core) >= 3.12)
Resolution: Package dependency needs to be met, so if required the package needs to be built from source before the build step.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(flit-core) < 4~~ with python3dist(flit-core) >= 3.12)
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s

Answer: The DNF5 command fails since there is a dependency which is not available from any source
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M cbe9e2faae7f43b6ad0663fdc55b13bc -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-bootstrap-1746776964.163860/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.msb6yihu:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-1746776964.163860/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-1746776964.163860/root/ --releasever 42 '/var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-1746776964.163860/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/python-stestr-4.2.0-1.fc42~bootstrap.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm' --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

Answer: The container is unable to spawn, because a required package is missing  python3dist(flit-core).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Requirement not satisfied: virtualenv; extra == 'test']: [The requirements from metadata were not satisfied.]
=============
[Requirement not satisfied: graphviz; extra == 'graphviz']: [The requirements from metadata were not satisfied.]
=============
[Requirement not satisfied: pytest-mock>=3.12; extra == 'test']: [The requirements from metadata were not satisfied.]
=============
[Requirement not satisfied: pytest>=7.4.3; extra == 'test']: [The requirements from metadata were not satisfied.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pip) >= 23.3.1']: [The missing dependent/required package was not matched for installation.]
=============
[Not all dependencies satisfied]: [The dependencies were not satisfied in completion.]
=============
[Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [The required package was not found]
=============
[WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s]: [The DNF command failed, it's trying again.]


Answer: Issue: There were some missing dependencies/required packages. When the DNF command tried to install the packages it failed, because the packages were not matched.
Resolution: Check that correct/available versions of packages are in the metadata. Check that the repos are available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement not satisfied: virtualenv; extra == 'test'

Answer: The requirements from metadata were not satisfied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement not satisfied: graphviz; extra == 'graphviz'

Answer: The requirements from metadata were not satisfied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement not satisfied: pytest-mock>=3.12; extra == 'test'

Answer: The requirements from metadata were not satisfied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement not satisfied: pytest>=7.4.3; extra == 'test'

Answer: The requirements from metadata were not satisfied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pip) >= 23.3.1'

Answer: The missing dependent/required package was not matched for installation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Not all dependencies satisfied

Answer: The dependencies were not satisfied in completion.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: The required package was not found
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s

Answer: The DNF command failed, it's trying again.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ rspec spec
/usr/bin/rspec:25: warning: syslog is not part of the default gems starting from Ruby 3.4.0. Install syslog from RubyGems.
An error occurred while loading ./spec/abrt_handler_spec.rb. - Did you mean?
                    rspec ./spec/abrt_spec.rb
Failure/Error: require 'syslog'
LoadError:
  cannot load such file -- syslog
# ./lib/abrt/handler.rb:2:in '<top (required)>'
# ./spec/abrt_handler_spec.rb:2:in '<top (required)>']: [When trying to execute tests with rspec, one of the test files failed to load its dependency of 'syslog'.]


Answer: Issue: Syslog moved from the standard library in Ruby to bundled gems. It is now available in "ruby-bundled-gems"
Resolution: Add "BuildRequires: rubygem(syslog)" to the specfile to install the syslog dependency for tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ rspec spec
/usr/bin/rspec:25: warning: syslog is not part of the default gems starting from Ruby 3.4.0. Install syslog from RubyGems.
An error occurred while loading ./spec/abrt_handler_spec.rb. - Did you mean?
                    rspec ./spec/abrt_spec.rb
Failure/Error: require 'syslog'
LoadError:
  cannot load such file -- syslog
# ./lib/abrt/handler.rb:2:in '<top (required)>'
# ./spec/abrt_handler_spec.rb:2:in '<top (required)>'

Answer: When trying to execute tests with rspec, one of the test files failed to load its dependency of 'syslog'.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [rubygem(actionpack) = 8.0.2]: [The `rubygem(actionpack)` dependency can't be installed.]


Answer: Issue: The `rubygem(actionpack)` dependency can't be installed. This dependency would be satisfied by `rubygem-actionpack` package. In this specific case, the package is not available for ppc64le platform.
Resolution: Make sure the `rubygem-actionpack` is available for the ppc64le platform
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
rubygem(actionpack) = 8.0.2

Answer: The `rubygem(actionpack)` dependency can't be installed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: command '/usr/bin/gcc' failed with exit code 1

Answer: Gcc with exit code 1 means that the compilation phase failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.iulThE (%build)

Answer: Compilation failure failed the whole %build phase.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3 -sP'

Answer: Gcc is executed using `python3 setup.py build` - so a "setuptools compilation" case.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
]: [Download of the external script has failed with HTTP return code 404 (can't be reached).]
=============
[error: Executing url helper "/usr/bin/curl --proto -all,+https,+ftps  --silent --show-error --fail --globoff --location -o /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/run-mozilla.sh https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/build/unix/run-mozilla.sh" failed with status 22
error: Couldn't download https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/build/unix/run-mozilla.sh]: [During the SRPM creation the helper script (https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/build/unix/run-mozilla.sh) used to create the RPM couldn't be downloaded by curl so execution of the script has failed.]


Answer: Issue: A script used to create RPM during the SRPM creation step can't be downloaded because it is  not reachable on the given URL.

Because SRPM can't be created the RPM build can't be executed.
Resolution: Please make sure that the script is available on the given link. If not please fix the link.

Another possibility is that the build environment doesn't have internet access or doesn't have access to this specific URL. In that case you should enable access of this URL in the build environment.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404


Answer: Download of the external script has failed with HTTP return code 404 (can't be reached).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Executing url helper "/usr/bin/curl --proto -all,+https,+ftps  --silent --show-error --fail --globoff --location -o /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/run-mozilla.sh https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/build/unix/run-mozilla.sh" failed with status 22
error: Couldn't download https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/build/unix/run-mozilla.sh

Answer: During the SRPM creation the helper script (https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/build/unix/run-mozilla.sh) used to create the RPM couldn't be downloaded by curl so execution of the script has failed.