fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Handling hatchling from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: hatchling
Handling hatch-vcs from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: hatch-vcs
Exiting dependency generation pass: build backend]: [Signals that the package in question is a Python package, and it uses Hatch to control its own packaging.]
=============
[ERROR: Package 'tmt' requires a different Python: 3.9.21 not in '>=3.12'
]: [Signals that the package requires a Python version that is not available: package has been built with Python 3.9.21, but its pyproject.toml requests Python 3.12 or newer.]


Answer: Issue: The package requires a Python version that is not available: package has been built with Python 3.9.21, but its pyproject.toml requests Python 3.12 or newer.
Resolution: Either relax the requirement to allow for available Python versions, or investigate options of getting new Python available in the targeted distro; that may be impractical given the planning and release cycle.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Handling hatchling from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: hatchling
Handling hatch-vcs from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: hatch-vcs
Exiting dependency generation pass: build backend

Answer: Signals that the package in question is a Python package, and it uses Hatch to control its own packaging.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Package 'tmt' requires a different Python: 3.9.21 not in '>=3.12'


Answer: Signals that the package requires a Python version that is not available: package has been built with Python 3.9.21, but its pyproject.toml requests Python 3.12 or newer.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(bindgen/default) >= 0.71.1 with crate(bindgen/default) < 0.72.0~)
]: [There is no package which can satisfy required dependency: crate(bindgen/default) version >= 0.71.1 and < 0.72.0]


Answer: Issue: Because required dependency can not be satisfied.
Resolution: Check requirements specified in a spec file, verify available packages and update spec files for target system.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(bindgen/default) >= 0.71.1 with crate(bindgen/default) < 0.72.0~)


Answer: There is no package which can satisfy required dependency: crate(bindgen/default) version >= 0.71.1 and < 0.72.0
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0]: [Call of the 'patch' command]
=============
[patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c]: [Patched file name and path]
=============
[Hunk #1 FAILED at 38.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c.rej]: [Specified which hunk failed and where]
=============
[patching file src/ALAC/alac_encoder.c
]: [Patched file name and path]
=============
[Hunk #1 FAILED at 44.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/ALAC/alac_encoder.c.rej]: [Specified which hunk failed and where]
=============
[%prep]: [RPM phase that failed]


Answer: Issue: The patch application failed
Resolution: rebase patches
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0

Answer: Call of the 'patch' command
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c

Answer: Patched file name and path
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Hunk #1 FAILED at 38.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c.rej

Answer: Specified which hunk failed and where
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
patching file src/ALAC/alac_encoder.c


Answer: Patched file name and path
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Hunk #1 FAILED at 44.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/ALAC/alac_encoder.c.rej

Answer: Specified which hunk failed and where
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
%prep

Answer: RPM phase that failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED: src/basic/libbasic.a.p/mountpoint-util.c.o 
gcc -Isrc/basic/libbasic.a.p -Isrc/basic -I../src/basic -Isrc/fundamental -I../src/fundamental -Isrc/systemd -I../src/systemd -I. -I.. -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Werror -std=gnu17 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-nonnull-compare -Warray-bounds -Warray-bounds=2 -Wdate-time -Wendif-labels -Werror=bool-compare -Werror=discarded-qualifiers -Werror=flex-array-member-not-at-end -Werror=format=2 -Werror=format-signedness -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=int-conversion -Werror=missing-declarations -Werror=missing-prototypes -Werror=overflow -Werror=override-init -Werror=pointer-sign -Werror=return-type -Werror=shift-count-overflow -Werror=shift-overflow=2 -Werror=strict-flex-arrays -Werror=undef -Wfloat-equal -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 -Winit-self -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wmissing-noreturn -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn -Wunterminated-string-initialization -Wunused-function -Wwrite-strings -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant -Wzero-length-bounds -fdiagnostics-show-option -fno-common -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-unused-result -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -Werror=shadow -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -fstrict-flex-arrays=1 -fvisibility=hidden -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -include config.h -pthread -isystem../src/basic/include -fvisibility=default -MD -MQ src/basic/libbasic.a.p/mountpoint-util.c.o -MF src/basic/libbasic.a.p/mountpoint-util.c.o.d -o src/basic/libbasic.a.p/mountpoint-util.c.o -c ../src/basic/mountpoint-util.c
../src/basic/mountpoint-util.c: In function âfd_fdinfo_mnt_idâ:
../src/basic/mountpoint-util.c:167:26: error: âpâ undeclared (first use in this function)
  167 |         return safe_atoi(p, ret_mnt_id);
      |                          ^
../src/basic/mountpoint-util.c:167:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

Answer: Build failed during code compilation with undeclared variable `p`.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/sleef-3.7.0-build/sleef-3.7/src/arch/helperpower_128.h: In function ‘vtruncate_vi_vd’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/sleef-3.7.0-build/sleef-3.7/src/arch/helperpower_128.h:410:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__builtin_vsx_xvcvdpsxws’; did you mean ‘__builtin_vsx_xvcvdpsxds’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
]: [Built-in function `__builtin_vsx_xvcvdpsxws` was removed in GCC 15.]


Answer: Issue: GCC 15 removed several PowerPC 64 built-in functions. This code uses `__builtin_vsx_xvcvdpsxws` which causes the build to fail.
Resolution: Migrate your code base away those removed built-in functions.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/sleef-3.7.0-build/sleef-3.7/src/arch/helperpower_128.h: In function ‘vtruncate_vi_vd’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/sleef-3.7.0-build/sleef-3.7/src/arch/helperpower_128.h:410:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__builtin_vsx_xvcvdpsxws’; did you mean ‘__builtin_vsx_xvcvdpsxds’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]


Answer: Built-in function `__builtin_vsx_xvcvdpsxws` was removed in GCC 15.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [-t]: [This line shows that the spec file is using the tox flag for %pyproject_buildrequires, so it will include the dependencies for the default tox environment.]
=============
[LookupError: tox configuration not found.]: [This line indicates that a tox configuration cannot be found.]


Answer: Issue: The tarball being used for the build does not include a tox configuration.
Resolution: Remove the -t flag from %pyproject_buildrequries since this project is not using tox.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
-t

Answer: This line shows that the spec file is using the tox flag for %pyproject_buildrequires, so it will include the dependencies for the default tox environment.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
LookupError: tox configuration not found.

Answer: This line indicates that a tox configuration cannot be found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_point]: [It shows the specific error that caused the fail.]


Answer: Issue: Python is trying to import C module 'libdnf.c', which doesn't have 'g_once_init_enter_pointer' symbol defined.
Resolution: Define symbol 'g_once_init_enter_pointer' in the C library 'libdnf'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_point

Answer: It shows the specific error that caused the fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [src/nvram.c: In function ‘dump_rtas_event_entry’:
src/nvram.c:932:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘parse_rtas_event’; expected 0, have 2
  932 |     rtas_event = parse_rtas_event(data, len);
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
src/nvram.c:938:5: error: too many arguments to function ‘rtas_print_event’; expected 0, have 3
  938 |     rtas_print_event(stdout, rtas_event, 0);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
src/nvram.c:940:5: error: too many arguments to function ‘cleanup_rtas_event’; expected 0, have 1
  940 |     cleanup_rtas_event(rtas_event);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~]: [The relevant error messages saying that there are too many arguments passed to function ‘parse_rtas_event’ ]


Answer: Issue: This code just built fine with gcc 14 and older but failed to build with gcc 15 which is defaulting to -std=gnu23 and due to the gcc bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118112
Resolution: The fix for gcc bug is still in progress. Adding  -std=gnu17 to CFLAGS is a workaround for the build failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
src/nvram.c: In function ‘dump_rtas_event_entry’:
src/nvram.c:932:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘parse_rtas_event’; expected 0, have 2
  932 |     rtas_event = parse_rtas_event(data, len);
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
src/nvram.c:938:5: error: too many arguments to function ‘rtas_print_event’; expected 0, have 3
  938 |     rtas_print_event(stdout, rtas_event, 0);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
src/nvram.c:940:5: error: too many arguments to function ‘cleanup_rtas_event’; expected 0, have 1
  940 |     cleanup_rtas_event(rtas_event);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: The relevant error messages saying that there are too many arguments passed to function ‘parse_rtas_event’
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Failed build dependencies:
	python3dist(tox-current-env) >= 0.0.16 is needed by rust2rpm-27.0.1-2.fc43.noarch]: [Missing dependency.]


Answer: Issue: The build is missing a dependency.
Resolution: Add missing dependency onto the build system and ideally into the specfile.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Failed build dependencies:
	python3dist(tox-current-env) >= 0.0.16 is needed by rust2rpm-27.0.1-2.fc43.noarch

Answer: Missing dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: mivisionx-devel
No match for argument: rocdecode-devel
No match for argument: rocjpeg-devel
No match for argument: rocm-omp-devel
No match for argument: rocm-rpp-devel]: [missing dependencies]


Answer: Issue: There are dependencies missing
Resolution: Package the dependencies, or do not build for Fedora releases that don't have the dependencies packaged.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: mivisionx-devel
No match for argument: rocdecode-devel
No match for argument: rocjpeg-devel
No match for argument: rocm-omp-devel
No match for argument: rocm-rpp-devel

Answer: missing dependencies
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/maven-assembly-plugin-3.3.0/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/assembly/archive/DefaultAssemblyArchiver.java:[344,63] incompatible types: org.codehaus.plexus.logging.Logger cannot be converted to org.slf4j.Logger]: [there is a mismatch between slf4j logger api and plexus container logging api]
=============
[[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : ]: [there was a java source compilation error]


Answer: Issue: build contains mixture of components using slf4j logger api and plexus container logging api, which won't work together
Resolution: ensure packages are compatible together. update dependency packages to versions compatible with your project
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/maven-assembly-plugin-3.3.0/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/assembly/archive/DefaultAssemblyArchiver.java:[344,63] incompatible types: org.codehaus.plexus.logging.Logger cannot be converted to org.slf4j.Logger

Answer: there is a mismatch between slf4j logger api and plexus container logging api
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 

Answer: there was a java source compilation error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M f9c4570f9ac64371a6f854ec1d708178 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-bootstrap-1735893892.092185/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.j0067ijd:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1735893892.092185/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1735893892.092185/root/ --releasever 41 /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1735893892.092185/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/python-Levenshtein-0.26.1-1.fc41.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts]: [General error message, indicating that the build has failed and providing the executed command.]
=============
[Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(rapidfuzz) &lt; 4~~ with python3dist(rapidfuzz) &gt;= 3.9)]: [There is no provider for the requested dependency, python3dist(rapidfuzz), within stated version constraints.]


Answer: Issue: One of the required dependencies was no available.
Resolution: All dependencies must be available from installed repositories in order for the build to be successful. Ensure that all required packages are available before the build. If necessary, adjust version constraints.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M f9c4570f9ac64371a6f854ec1d708178 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-bootstrap-1735893892.092185/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.j0067ijd:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1735893892.092185/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1735893892.092185/root/ --releasever 41 /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1735893892.092185/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/python-Levenshtein-0.26.1-1.fc41.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

Answer: General error message, indicating that the build has failed and providing the executed command.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(rapidfuzz) &lt; 4~~ with python3dist(rapidfuzz) &gt;= 3.9)

Answer: There is no provider for the requested dependency, python3dist(rapidfuzz), within stated version constraints.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Problem: package python3-pydantic-2.5.3-1.fc40.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-2.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.i686
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-2.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.x86_64
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10]: [Your dependency (python3-pydantic) requires Python in version equal to 3.12. But at the same time package python3-devel conflicts with Python smaller than 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40]
=============
[
 python-rpm-macros       noarch 3.13-5.fc40             copr_base                                                      22.1 KiB
 python3                 x86_64 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40        copr_base                                                      32.1 KiB
 python3-libs            x86_64 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40        copr_base                                                      38.5 Mi]: [You are using Python in version 3.13.]


Answer: Issue: Your dependency is using older Python that is incompatible with the current version.
Resolution: You need to rebuild python3-pydantic first with the newer version of Python first. If python3-pydantic is not your package you have to contact the maintainer of this package and ask them to rebuild the package because of new version of Python.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Problem: package python3-pydantic-2.5.3-1.fc40.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-2.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.i686
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-2.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.x86_64
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10

Answer: Your dependency (python3-pydantic) requires Python in version equal to 3.12. But at the same time package python3-devel conflicts with Python smaller than 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

 python-rpm-macros       noarch 3.13-5.fc40             copr_base                                                      22.1 KiB
 python3                 x86_64 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40        copr_base                                                      32.1 KiB
 python3-libs            x86_64 3.13.0~a3-2.fc40        copr_base                                                      38.5 Mi

Answer: You are using Python in version 3.13.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/conmux-registry
   /usr/sbin/conmuxd
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/conmux-attach
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/conmux-registry
   /usr/sbin/conmuxd]: [Extra files are present in build root.]


Answer: Issue: There are files that are present in build root but not listed in %files section.
Resolution: Verify that files are expect to be in rpm and add them to %files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/conmux-registry
   /usr/sbin/conmuxd
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/conmux-attach
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/conmux-registry
   /usr/sbin/conmuxd

Answer: Extra files are present in build root.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [You are in 'detached HEAD' state]: [Working in 'detached' HEAD state.]


Answer: Issue: 'detatched HEAD' state
Resolution: You can create a new branch to retain commits you create
#git switch -c <new-branch-name>
or undo this operation with 
#git switch -
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
You are in 'detached HEAD' state

Answer: Working in 'detached' HEAD state.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ ruby -e 'Dir.glob "./test/*_test.rb", &method(:require)'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1904:in '<class:Base>': uninitialized constant Rack::Protection::EncryptedCookie (NameError)

    set :session_store, Rack::Protection::EncryptedCookie
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/lib/sinatra/base.rb:964:in '<module:Sinatra>'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/lib/sinatra/base.rb:20:in '<top (required)>'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/test/test_helper.rb:38:in '<top (required)>'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/test/asciidoctor_test.rb:1:in 'Kernel#require_relative'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/test/asciidoctor_test.rb:1:in '<top (required)>'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:dir>:412:in 'Dir.glob'
	from -e:1:in '<main>'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DwnwXi (%check)]: [This contains test suite error]


Answer: Issue: This is caused by incompatibility with Rack::Protection 4.0.0+, which dropped support for `Rack::Protection::EncryptedCookie` [1].

[1]: https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/commit/9c147640d0af8d5149d85814e2949cd06741e52f
Resolution: Adjust the code for compatibility with Rack::Protection 4.0.0+. Equivalent functionality is provided by rack-session gem.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ ruby -e 'Dir.glob "./test/*_test.rb", &method(:require)'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1904:in '<class:Base>': uninitialized constant Rack::Protection::EncryptedCookie (NameError)

    set :session_store, Rack::Protection::EncryptedCookie
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/lib/sinatra/base.rb:964:in '<module:Sinatra>'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/lib/sinatra/base.rb:20:in '<top (required)>'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/test/test_helper.rb:38:in '<top (required)>'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/test/asciidoctor_test.rb:1:in 'Kernel#require_relative'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sinatra-3.2.0-build/sinatra-3.2.0/usr/share/gems/gems/sinatra-3.2.0/test/asciidoctor_test.rb:1:in '<top (required)>'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:dir>:412:in 'Dir.glob'
	from -e:1:in '<main>'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DwnwXi (%check)

Answer: This contains test suite error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Testing local build
stderr:
test_auth_mode (__main__.BoltTest.test_auth_mode) ... /usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/gi/events.py:660: DeprecationWarning: 'asyncio.AbstractEventLoopPolicy' is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.16
  class GLibEventLoopPolicy(asyncio.AbstractEventLoopPolicy):
/usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/gi/_ossighelper.py:268: DeprecationWarning: 'asyncio.get_event_loop_policy' is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.16
  policy = asyncio.get_event_loop_policy()
ERROR
======================================================================
ERROR: test_auth_mode (__main__.BoltTest.test_auth_mode)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/bolt-0.9.9-build/bolt-0.9.9/tests/test-integration", line 1604, in test_auth_mode
    self.assertGError(cm, Gio.DBusError.ACCESS_DENIED)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/bolt-0.9.9-build/bolt-0.9.9/tests/test-integration", line 1276, in assertGError
    domain = GLib.quark_to_string(want.quark())
                                  ~~~~~~~~~~^^
TypeError: Gio.DBusError.quark() takes exactly 0 arguments (1 given)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.390s
FAILED (errors=1)]: [This shows a bolt test failure, indicating that this is possibly an upstream issue or a test environment one. Precisely the test-integration which fails with a PyGObject issue.]


Answer: Issue: The built failed because the test-integration test script for bolt failed. The error is related to the use of deprecated PyGObject APIs.
Resolution: Adapt the upstream test to use modern (not deprecated APIs). Include the fix in a stable upstream release or as a downstream patch.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Testing local build
stderr:
test_auth_mode (__main__.BoltTest.test_auth_mode) ... /usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/gi/events.py:660: DeprecationWarning: 'asyncio.AbstractEventLoopPolicy' is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.16
  class GLibEventLoopPolicy(asyncio.AbstractEventLoopPolicy):
/usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/gi/_ossighelper.py:268: DeprecationWarning: 'asyncio.get_event_loop_policy' is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.16
  policy = asyncio.get_event_loop_policy()
ERROR
======================================================================
ERROR: test_auth_mode (__main__.BoltTest.test_auth_mode)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/bolt-0.9.9-build/bolt-0.9.9/tests/test-integration", line 1604, in test_auth_mode
    self.assertGError(cm, Gio.DBusError.ACCESS_DENIED)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/bolt-0.9.9-build/bolt-0.9.9/tests/test-integration", line 1276, in assertGError
    domain = GLib.quark_to_string(want.quark())
                                  ~~~~~~~~~~^^
TypeError: Gio.DBusError.quark() takes exactly 0 arguments (1 given)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.390s
FAILED (errors=1)

Answer: This shows a bolt test failure, indicating that this is possibly an upstream issue or a test environment one. Precisely the test-integration which fails with a PyGObject issue.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CC=clang]: [clang is being used as the C compiler.]
=============
[CXX=clang++]: [clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler.]
=============
[gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ]: [This is the error message from the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the RPM spec file set clang as the C compiler, but the project's build system has hard-coded gcc as the C compiler.  This causes gcc to fail, because it tries to use compiler flags intended for clang.
Resolution: The package's build system should be updated to respect the value of the CC environment variable and not hard-code clang as the C compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ

Answer: This is the error message from the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: python3-pytest > 10]: [Build failure reason.]


Answer: Issue: No python3-pytest package in version 10 or above is available for install.
Resolution: Add repository with python3-pytest package in version 10 or above or change your requirements to meet current available version of python3-pytest package in buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3-pytest > 10

Answer: Build failure reason.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : ]: [indicates that there was a compilation failure]
=============
[[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.12.1.MBI:compile (default-compile) on project]: [indicates that there was an error raised by maven compiler plugin]
=============
[[INFO] BUILD FAILURE]: [indicates that maven build failed]


Answer: Issue: compilation of Java sources failed.
Resolution: maintainer should review the output of maven compiler plugin contained in the logs and fix the underlying issues
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 

Answer: indicates that there was a compilation failure
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.12.1.MBI:compile (default-compile) on project

Answer: indicates that there was an error raised by maven compiler plugin
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE

Answer: indicates that maven build failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Run-time dependency systemd found: NO (tried pkgconfig)

meson.build:280:10: ERROR: Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconfig]: [This is where the problem manifests.]


Answer: Issue: The error occurs because the systemd dependency is not found, despite the build configuration explicitly enabling systemd support with -D systemd=enabled.
Resolution: Add the following to the spec file
BuildRequires: systemd
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Run-time dependency systemd found: NO (tried pkgconfig)

meson.build:280:10: ERROR: Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconfig

Answer: This is where the problem manifests.