fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_local_override_global
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_negative[p0-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_negative[pgbouncer-pgbouncer]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_negative[pgbouncer-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_positive[p0-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_positive[pgbouncer-pgbouncer]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_positive[pgbouncer-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_decrement[p0-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_negative[client_limit_db-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_positive[client_limit_db-muser1]
FAILED test/test_load_balance_hosts.py::test_load_balance_hosts_reload - Asse...

Answer: There are specific failed tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'krb5-kdb-devel-version = 8.0'
No matching package to install: 'krb5-kdb-version = 8.0'
No matching package to install: 'libsss_nss_idmap-devel >= 2.7.0'
Package pkgconf-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun

Answer: shows the packages cannot be installed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Error: Some packages could not be found.
Finish: build setup for freeipa-4.11.0-8.amzn2023.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for freeipa-4.11.0-8.amzn2023.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710338498.311870/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710338498.311870/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710338498.311870/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/freeipa-4.11.0-8.amzn2023.src.rpm) Config(amazonlinux-2023-x86_64) 0 minutes 24 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M c921026d2dc54538a7a7dd1900b8cfe6 -D /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-bootstrap-1710338498.311870/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.ahmbx1a1:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710338498.311870/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710338498.311870/root/ --releasever 2023 --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710338498.311870/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/freeipa-4.11.0-8.amzn2023.src.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                                  63 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
No matching package to install: 'krb5-kdb-devel-version = 8.0'
No matching package to install: 'krb5-kdb-version = 8.0'
No matching package to install: 'libsss_nss_idmap-devel >= 2.7.0'
Package pkgconf-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun

Answer: shows the error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1120446 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
:: [ 22:01:16 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command './Install < /dev/null' (Expected 0, got 1)
]: [Fail of bcc during registration]
=============
[/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1120613 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
]: [Record of underlying bcc layer crash during its un-registration.]


Answer: Issue: The underlying bcc layer has failed (core-dumped).
Resolution: This is a known issue for older llvm. If it reoccures, please report it to the bcc (kernel) team.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1120446 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
:: [ 22:01:16 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command './Install < /dev/null' (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Fail of bcc during registration
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1120613 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python


Answer: Record of underlying bcc layer crash during its un-registration.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 730, in main
    generate_requires(
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
        include_runtime=args.runtime,
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ...<11 lines>...
        config_settings=parse_config_settings_args(args.config_settings),
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    )
    ^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 612, in generate_requires
    generate_build_requirements(backend, requirements)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 302, in generate_build_requirements
    new_reqs = get_requires(config_settings=requirements.config_settings)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 334, in get_requires_for_build_wheel
    return self._get_build_requires(config_settings, requirements=[])
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 304, in _get_build_requires
    self.run_setup()
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 522, in run_setup
    super().run_setup(setup_script=setup_script)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 320, in run_setup
    exec(code, locals())
    ~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "<string>", line 22, in <module>
  File "<string>", line 16, in version
AttributeError: 'Constant' object has no attribute 's']: [The package is defined via a legacy setup.py script (setuptools tuns self.run_setup() to generate the package metadata). The code in the setup.py tries to access an attribute "s" of the "Constant" object, which is not available, hence AttributeError.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xHdfQt (%generate_buildrequires)]: [The phase of generating build requirements failed.]


Answer: Issue: Attributes ast.Constant.n and ast.Constant.s were removed from Python 3.14. Because they are no longer available, the setup.py script can't be run successfully.
Resolution: What's new in Python 3.14 suggests to use ast.Constant.value instead of the removed attributes. This should be changed in the setup.py file defining the package metadata.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 730, in main
    generate_requires(
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
        include_runtime=args.runtime,
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ...<11 lines>...
        config_settings=parse_config_settings_args(args.config_settings),
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    )
    ^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 612, in generate_requires
    generate_build_requirements(backend, requirements)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 302, in generate_build_requirements
    new_reqs = get_requires(config_settings=requirements.config_settings)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 334, in get_requires_for_build_wheel
    return self._get_build_requires(config_settings, requirements=[])
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 304, in _get_build_requires
    self.run_setup()
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 522, in run_setup
    super().run_setup(setup_script=setup_script)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 320, in run_setup
    exec(code, locals())
    ~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "<string>", line 22, in <module>
  File "<string>", line 16, in version
AttributeError: 'Constant' object has no attribute 's'

Answer: The package is defined via a legacy setup.py script (setuptools tuns self.run_setup() to generate the package metadata). The code in the setup.py tries to access an attribute "s" of the "Constant" object, which is not available, hence AttributeError.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xHdfQt (%generate_buildrequires)

Answer: The phase of generating build requirements failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Child return code was: 11
Dynamic buildrequires detected

Answer: Indicates a segmentation fault also known as segfault i.e. SIGSEGV is denoted with 11.

Post which koji detected missing dependencies through buildrequires.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Child return code was: 1

Answer: Seems like there was a termination of the TTY/terminal here, SIGHUP is denoted as 1.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Child return code was: 4

Answer: Seems like there was an invalid instruction sent to the CPU, SIGILL is denoted as 4.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:556:  Executing command: ['userdel', '-f', 'mockbuild', '--prefix', '/var/lib/mock/f40-build-59048254-6570588/root'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:459:  userdel: user 'mockbuild' does not exist
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 6
DEBUG util.py:634:  child environment: None
DEBUG util.py:556:  Executing command: ['groupdel', 'mock', '--prefix', '/var/lib/mock/f40-build-59048254-6570588/root'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:459:  groupdel: group 'mock' does not exist
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 6
DEBUG util.py:634:  child environment: None
DEBUG util.py:556:  Executing command: ['groupadd', 'mock', '-g', '425', '--prefix', '/var/lib/mock/f40-build-59048254-6570588/root'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 0
DEBUG util.py:634:  child environment: None
DEBUG util.py:556:  Executing command: ['useradd', 'mockbuild'

Answer: User was not detected and was created later, so we can rule an account permissions/rbac issue out.

 SIGIOT is denoted as 4 also known as SIGABRT, used when a program deliberately terminates itself due to an internal error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Option --new-chroot has been deprecated. Use --isolation=nspawn instead.
INFO: mock.py version 6.1 starting (python version = 3.13.2, NVR = mock-6.1-1.fc41), args: /usr/libexec/mock/mock -r koji/f40-build-59048254-6570588 --new-chroot --no-clean --target noarch --rebuild /var/tmp/koji/tasks/2538/131902538/local/work/tasks/2458/131902458/python-beautifulsoup4-4.13.4-1.fc40.src.rpm

Answer: The --new-chroot has been deprecated, in the next line we can see koji/f40-build-59048254-6570588 has been started with the same flag.

The same fails below, stating "ERROR: Exception(/var/tmp/koji/tasks/2538/131902538/local/work/tasks/2458/131902458/python-beautifulsoup4-4.13.4-1.fc40.src.rpm) Config(f40-build-59048254-6570588) 0 minutes 30 seconds"
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failing test(s): perfschema.transaction_nested_events rpl.rpl_eventlog_psi_memory rpl.rpl_json]: [This line says there are failures in the testsuite]


Answer: Issue: The testsuite failed on some tests.
Resolution: There are two ways how to fix this.

Either fix the tests that are failing.

Or disable them as is done for other failing tests. In this case, it should be reported and checked further. Also, the tests from the 'main' testsuite should not be disabled.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failing test(s): perfschema.transaction_nested_events rpl.rpl_eventlog_psi_memory rpl.rpl_json

Answer: This line says there are failures in the testsuite
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:556:  Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M', 'df98b1bea2f446379804ec783a40c71f', '-D', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913-bootstrap/root', '-a', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', '--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.5x7lyrb2:/etc/resolv.conf', '--console=pipe', '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/installation-homedir', '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', '--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', '/usr/bin/dnf5', 'builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/php-twig-1.44.7-6.fc43.src.rpm', '--setopt=deltarpm=False', '--setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes', '--allowerasing', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/installation-homedir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:459:  Updating and loading repositories:
DEBUG util.py:459:   build                                  100% |  85.2 KiB/s |   3.5 KiB |  00m00s
DEBUG util.py:459:  Repositories loaded.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem: nothing provides requested (php-composer(symfony/debug) >= 3.4 with php-composer(symfony/debug) < 4)
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1
]: [DNF fails to resolve dependencies]


Answer: Issue: php-composer(symfony/debug) version >= 3.4 and < 4 is not available
Resolution: If symfony/debug is a runtime dependency, the package needs to be adapted to run with available dependency, or missing dependency be added, or packaged retired.

If symfony/debug is a buildtime dependency, only used byt the test suite, the test suite needs to be adapted of relevant unit tests ignored.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:556:  Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M', 'df98b1bea2f446379804ec783a40c71f', '-D', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913-bootstrap/root', '-a', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', '--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.5x7lyrb2:/etc/resolv.conf', '--console=pipe', '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/installation-homedir', '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', '--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', '/usr/bin/dnf5', 'builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/', '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/php-twig-1.44.7-6.fc43.src.rpm', '--setopt=deltarpm=False', '--setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes', '--allowerasing', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/var/lib/mock/f43-build-59844246-6576913/root/installation-homedir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False
DEBUG util.py:459:  Updating and loading repositories:
DEBUG util.py:459:   build                                  100% |  85.2 KiB/s |   3.5 KiB |  00m00s
DEBUG util.py:459:  Repositories loaded.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem: nothing provides requested (php-composer(symfony/debug) >= 3.4 with php-composer(symfony/debug) < 4)
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1


Answer: DNF fails to resolve dependencies
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status]: [Error that caused the build to fail]
=============
[/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: bad value
]: [Explanation how the 'ld' failed]
=============
[/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccYmXGlK.ltrans127.ltrans.o: relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against `_ZN5tpoolL15tls_worker_dataE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
]: [Suggested solution: recompile with -fPIC]


Answer: Issue: A binary requires to be compiled with '-fPIC' compilation flag, but it is missing.
Resolution: Make sure the compilation flag is propagated correctly through the build process.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Answer: Error that caused the build to fail
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccYmXGlK.ltrans127.ltrans.o: relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against `_ZN5tpoolL15tls_worker_dataE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC


Answer: Suggested solution: recompile with -fPIC
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
src/libnm-glib-aux/nm-uuid.c:490:12: error: '_1' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]: [This is warning about uninitialized variable.]
=============
[
lto1: all warnings being treated as errors
lto-wrapper: fatal error: gcc returned 1 exit statu]: [All warning are treated as error. And previous warning are converted to error.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because there is warning about not initialized variable and the setting of the project is that all warnings are fatal.
Resolution: Please look at the source and make sure you use only initialized variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

src/libnm-glib-aux/nm-uuid.c:490:12: error: '_1' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized

Answer: This is warning about uninitialized variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

lto1: all warnings being treated as errors
lto-wrapper: fatal error: gcc returned 1 exit statu

Answer: All warning are treated as error. And previous warning are converted to error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
collecting ... Fatal Python error: Segmentation fau]: [Contains a message about crashing test runner.]
=============
[erberos-0.14.0/.pyproject-builddir" PYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS=2 /usr/bin/pytest -v tests
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Jv4rSF (%check)

RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Jv4rSF (%check)
Finish: rpmbuild python-requests-kerberos-0.14.0-3.fc41.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for python-requests-kerberos-0.14.0-3.fc41.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 1 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1710345011.756773/root/var/log/dnf5.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-requests-kerberos-0.14.0-3.fc41.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 21 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M dc7f7df480e040e4a3f4ad488b59bb91 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1710345011.756773/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.fz8vawpf:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --]: [Has additional details about the test runner segmentation fault and termination.]


Answer: Issue: The test runner crashed.
Resolution: I don't know how exactly to handle the fix, the issue was caused either by a compiler (gcc) or python interpreter bumps to later versions, and fixing the issue would imply making changes to the source code and/or fixing a python/pytest/gcc bug.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

collecting ... Fatal Python error: Segmentation fau

Answer: Contains a message about crashing test runner.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
erberos-0.14.0/.pyproject-builddir" PYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS=2 /usr/bin/pytest -v tests
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Jv4rSF (%check)

RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Jv4rSF (%check)
Finish: rpmbuild python-requests-kerberos-0.14.0-3.fc41.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for python-requests-kerberos-0.14.0-3.fc41.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 1 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1710345011.756773/root/var/log/dnf5.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-requests-kerberos-0.14.0-3.fc41.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 21 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M dc7f7df480e040e4a3f4ad488b59bb91 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1710345011.756773/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.fz8vawpf:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --

Answer: Has additional details about the test runner segmentation fault and termination.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Requirement not satisfied: httpx (>=0.28.1)
]: [Couldn't install the httpx dependency satisfying required version]
=============
[Requirement not satisfied: pydantic (>=2.11.2)
]: [Couldn't install the pydantic dependency of required version]
=============
[Requirement not satisfied: python-dotenv (>=1.1.0)
]: [Couldn't install the python-dotenv dependency of required version]


Answer: Issue: Required dependencies are not available in the versions that are required by the current release.
Resolution: Release the newer versions of the dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement not satisfied: httpx (>=0.28.1)


Answer: Couldn't install the httpx dependency satisfying required version
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement not satisfied: pydantic (>=2.11.2)


Answer: Couldn't install the pydantic dependency of required version
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement not satisfied: python-dotenv (>=1.1.0)


Answer: Couldn't install the python-dotenv dependency of required version
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'python3dist(xmlschema) >= 2.2.3']: [Required package `python3dist(xmlschema) >= 2.2.3` couldn't be found.]


Answer: Issue: Dependencies couldn't be satisfied.
Resolution: Check presence of dependencies in installed repositories. If possible, add package to repository or install repository providing it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(xmlschema) >= 2.2.3'

Answer: Required package `python3dist(xmlschema) >= 2.2.3` couldn't be found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [*** [<builtin>: pltcl.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile:35: all-tcl-recurse] Error 2]: [It failed in the build section ]
=============
[pltcl.c:]: [file where the problem is ]
=============
[pltcl.c:1028:63: error: passing argument 3 of ‘Tcl_ListObjGetElements’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
 1028 |                 if (Tcl_ListObjGetElements(interp, resultObj, &resultObjc, &resultObjv) == TCL_ERROR)
      |                                                               ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                               |
      |                                                               int *]: [the most detailed description about issue]


Answer: Issue: There is an issue with pltcl and postgresql compatibility. In must be resolved by postgresql upstream by adopting changes in pltcl. 
Resolution: Report to upstream, try to update to the latest version of postgresql, debug and prepare downstream patch but The second option is the best choice
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
*** [<builtin>: pltcl.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile:35: all-tcl-recurse] Error 2

Answer: It failed in the build section
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
pltcl.c:

Answer: file where the problem is
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
pltcl.c:1028:63: error: passing argument 3 of ‘Tcl_ListObjGetElements’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
 1028 |                 if (Tcl_ListObjGetElements(interp, resultObj, &resultObjc, &resultObjv) == TCL_ERROR)
      |                                                               ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                               |
      |                                                               int *

Answer: the most detailed description about issue
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to download Packages/q/qm-0.6.9-2.fc42.noarch.rpm from repo fedora-43-x86_64: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success]: [Download error]


Answer: Issue: The test can not download package
Resolution: Check dependencies of the build if the requested package is correctly spelled and exists. If this is correct, then restart the test as it is mostly caused by a temporary network glitch.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to download Packages/q/qm-0.6.9-2.fc42.noarch.rpm from repo fedora-43-x86_64: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success

Answer: Download error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/0010-frr-reload-escape-strings.patch: No such file or directory
    Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/0010-frr-reload-escape-strings.patch: No such file or directory
Child return code was: 1]: [Indication of missing file.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because there was a missing patch file in the rpm directory.
Resolution: Check the directory and specfile, fix the specfile or make sure that mentioned patch file is presented in directory.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/0010-frr-reload-escape-strings.patch: No such file or directory
    Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/0010-frr-reload-escape-strings.patch: No such file or directory
Child return code was: 1

Answer: Indication of missing file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [go build -buildmode pie -compiler gc '-tags=rpm_crashtraceback ' -a -v -x -ldflags '-X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.buildInfo=1747699200          -X "github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.buildOrigin=Copr: rhcontainerbot/podman-next"          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/config._installPrefix=/usr          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/config._etcDir=/etc          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/pkg/systemd/quadlet._binDir=/usr/bin -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.gitCommit=9800f643be4b93244f8cea75429fcb85b502c5b8  -B 0xca87bdcb9a60b1b0ba7181fa24fba976351fd426 -compressdwarf=false -linkmode=external -extldflags '\''-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes  '\''' -o bin/rootlessport ./cmd/rootlessport
WORK=/tmp/go-build1871151545
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.3 (running go 1.23.1; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)]: [This is the key error message.]


Answer: Issue: The podman source code requires Go version 1.23.3 or higher, but the build environment is using Go 1.23.1.
Resolution: Update the Go version requirement in the project's go.mod file to match what's available in the build environment.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
go build -buildmode pie -compiler gc '-tags=rpm_crashtraceback ' -a -v -x -ldflags '-X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.buildInfo=1747699200          -X "github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.buildOrigin=Copr: rhcontainerbot/podman-next"          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/config._installPrefix=/usr          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/config._etcDir=/etc          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/pkg/systemd/quadlet._binDir=/usr/bin -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.gitCommit=9800f643be4b93244f8cea75429fcb85b502c5b8  -B 0xca87bdcb9a60b1b0ba7181fa24fba976351fd426 -compressdwarf=false -linkmode=external -extldflags '\''-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes  '\''' -o bin/rootlessport ./cmd/rootlessport
WORK=/tmp/go-build1871151545
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.3 (running go 1.23.1; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)

Answer: This is the key error message.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/env CARGO_HOME=.cargo RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 'RUSTFLAGS=-Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=1 -Cstrip=none -Cforce-frame-pointers=yes -Clink-arg=-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes --cap-lints=warn' /usr/bin/cargo tree -Z avoid-dev-deps --workspace --offline --edges no-build,no-dev,no-proc-macro --no-dedupe --target all --features engine,dbus_enabled,min,systemd_compat,extras,udev_scripts --prefix none --format '{l}: {p}'
+ sort -u
++ pwd
+ sed -e 's: (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5[^)]*)::g' -e 's: / :/:g' -e 's:/: OR :g'
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `syn = "^1.0.73"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 2.0.52
location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`)
required by package `stratisd_proc_macros v0.2.1 (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5/stratisd_proc_macros)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `stratisd_proc_macros` of package `stratisd v3.6.5 (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5)`
perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored?
As a reminder, you're using offline mode (--offline) which can sometimes cause surprising resolution failures, if this error is too confusing you may wish to retry without the offline flag.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kLlfd8 (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kLlfd8 (%build]: [It shows the failure.]
=============
[location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`)]: [It is the step that puts the dependencies into the local registry.]


Answer: Issue: In a previous step, not all the required dependencies were installed in the local registry. In particular, those for a dependency designated as a path dependency in the project's Cargo.toml for the top-level package were not installed.
Resolution: Declare a workspace table in the Cargo.toml associated with the top-level package in the repo. Add both the top-level package and the small ancillary package to that workspace's members table.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/env CARGO_HOME=.cargo RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 'RUSTFLAGS=-Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=1 -Cstrip=none -Cforce-frame-pointers=yes -Clink-arg=-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes --cap-lints=warn' /usr/bin/cargo tree -Z avoid-dev-deps --workspace --offline --edges no-build,no-dev,no-proc-macro --no-dedupe --target all --features engine,dbus_enabled,min,systemd_compat,extras,udev_scripts --prefix none --format '{l}: {p}'
+ sort -u
++ pwd
+ sed -e 's: (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5[^)]*)::g' -e 's: / :/:g' -e 's:/: OR :g'
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `syn = "^1.0.73"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 2.0.52
location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`)
required by package `stratisd_proc_macros v0.2.1 (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5/stratisd_proc_macros)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `stratisd_proc_macros` of package `stratisd v3.6.5 (/builddir/build/BUILD/stratisd-stratisd-v3.6.5)`
perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored?
As a reminder, you're using offline mode (--offline) which can sometimes cause surprising resolution failures, if this error is too confusing you may wish to retry without the offline flag.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kLlfd8 (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kLlfd8 (%build

Answer: It shows the failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`)

Answer: It is the step that puts the dependencies into the local registry.