fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  2) ABRT handles exception in 'abrt.rb' with RubyGems disabled
     Failure/Error:
       expect { system "ruby --disable-gems #{abrt_rb}" }
         .to output(/\A\Z/).to_stdout_from_any_process
         .and output(output_message_pattern).to_stderr_from_any_process
       expected block to output /\A\/builddir\/build\/BUILD\/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build\/abrt-0.4.0\/usr\/share\/gems\/gems\/abrt-0.4.0...rt.rb:\d+:in `<main>': can't modify frozen Array(: \[1, 2, 3\])? \((FrozenError|RuntimeError)\)\n\Z/ to stderr, but output "/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build/abrt-0.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/abrt-0.4.0/lib/abrt/ha...abrt-0.4.0/spec/../lib/abrt.rb:15:in '<main>': can't modify frozen Array: [1, 2, 3] (FrozenError)\n"
       Diff for (output /\A\/builddir\/build\/BUILD\/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build\/...):
       @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
       -/\A\/builddir\/build\/BUILD\/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build\/abrt-0.4.0\/usr\/share\/gems\/gems\/abrt-0.4.0\/spec\/..\/lib\/abrt.rb:\d+:in `<main>': can't modify frozen Array(: \[1, 2, 3\])? \((FrozenError|RuntimeError)\)\n\Z/
       +/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build/abrt-0.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/abrt-0.4.0/lib/abrt/handler.rb:2:in 'Kernel#require': cannot load such file -- syslog (LoadError)
       +	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build/abrt-0.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/abrt-0.4.0/lib/abrt/handler.rb:2:in '<top (required)>'
       +	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build/abrt-0.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/abrt-0.4.0/spec/../lib/abrt.rb:8:in 'Kernel#require_relative'
       +	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build/abrt-0.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/abrt-0.4.0/spec/../lib/abrt.rb:8:in 'block in <main>'
       +/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build/abrt-0.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/abrt-0.4.0/spec/../lib/abrt.rb:15:in '<main>': can't modify frozen Array: [1, 2, 3] (FrozenError)
     # ./spec/abrt_spec.rb:10:in 'block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

Answer: `syslog` is can't be found. This is due to Ruby 3.4 removing `syslog` from default gems
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  3) ABRT handles exception in 'abrt.rb' with RubyGems enabled
     Failure/Error:
       expect { system "ruby --disable-gems -rrubygems #{abrt_rb}" }
         .to output(/\A\Z/).to_stdout_from_any_process
         .and output(output_message_pattern).to_stderr_from_any_process
       expected block to output /\A\/builddir\/build\/BUILD\/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build\/abrt-0.4.0\/usr\/share\/gems\/gems\/abrt-0.4.0...rt.rb:\d+:in `<main>': can't modify frozen Array(: \[1, 2, 3\])? \((FrozenError|RuntimeError)\)\n\Z/ to stderr, but output "/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build/abrt-0.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/abrt-0.4.0/spec/../lib/abrt.rb:15:in '<main>': can't modify frozen Array: [1, 2, 3] (FrozenError)\n"
       Diff for (output /\A\/builddir\/build\/BUILD\/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build\/...):
       @@ -1 +1 @@
       -/\A\/builddir\/build\/BUILD\/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build\/abrt-0.4.0\/usr\/share\/gems\/gems\/abrt-0.4.0\/spec\/..\/lib\/abrt.rb:\d+:in `<main>': can't modify frozen Array(: \[1, 2, 3\])? \((FrozenError|RuntimeError)\)\n\Z/
       +/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build/abrt-0.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/abrt-0.4.0/spec/../lib/abrt.rb:15:in '<main>': can't modify frozen Array: [1, 2, 3] (FrozenError)
     # ./spec/abrt_spec.rb:16:in 'block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

Answer: `' pair was changed to '' in Ruby 3.4
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { code: 24, kind: Uncategorized, message: "Too many open files" }]: [It contains the first instance of the Rust error that caused the unit test to fail.]


Answer: Issue: A Rust unit test failed with "too many open files" due to many threads opening file descriptors at once.
Resolution: Limit test parallelism by restricting the number of threads using the --test-threads parameter of %cargo_test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { code: 24, kind: Uncategorized, message: "Too many open files" }

Answer: It contains the first instance of the Rust error that caused the unit test to fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Run-time dependency libadwaita-1 found: NO 

src/meson.build:23:2: ERROR: Dependency lookup for libadwaita-1 with method 'pkgconfig' failed: Invalid version, need 'libadwaita-1' ['>= 1.7'] found '1.6.6'.]: [This is the main error.]


Answer: Issue: The build is failing because it requires a newer version of libadwaita than what's available in the build environment.
Resolution: Option 1: Modify the source code to be compatible with libadwaita 1.6.6
If possible, modify the meson.build file to accept the older version of libadwaita:
# Find this line in src/meson.build (around line 23)
dependency('libadwaita-1', version: '>= 1.7')
# Change it to
dependency('libadwaita-1', version: '>= 1.6.6')
You may need to adjust the code to handle any API differences between 1.6.6 and 1.7.

Option 2: Build for a newer Fedora/RHEL version
If the application truly requires libadwaita 1.7+ and can't be modified, you might need to build it for a newer version of Fedora where libadwaita 1.7+ is available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Run-time dependency libadwaita-1 found: NO 

src/meson.build:23:2: ERROR: Dependency lookup for libadwaita-1 with method 'pkgconfig' failed: Invalid version, need 'libadwaita-1' ['>= 1.7'] found '1.6.6'.

Answer: This is the main error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides libhdf5.so.200()(64bit) needed by python3-h5py-3.12.1-3.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base
  - nothing provides libhdf5_hl.so.200()(64bit) needed by python3-h5py-3.12.1-3.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base
  - nothing provides hdf5(x86-64) = 1.12.1 needed by python3-h5py-3.12.1-3.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base]: [Multiple requested dependencies are no available. ]


Answer: Issue: Some of the dependencies are not available in `copr_base` repository. Causing build failure.
Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies are available at build time. Introduce repositories carrying them, or ensure they are present in package repositories you already use.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides libhdf5.so.200()(64bit) needed by python3-h5py-3.12.1-3.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base
  - nothing provides libhdf5_hl.so.200()(64bit) needed by python3-h5py-3.12.1-3.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base
  - nothing provides hdf5(x86-64) = 1.12.1 needed by python3-h5py-3.12.1-3.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base

Answer: Multiple requested dependencies are no available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [make[2]: *** [Makefile:860: all] Error 2

crash build failed

make[1]: *** [Makefile:266: gdb_merge] Error 1]: [The primary error message indicates a failure in the all target of the Makefile, specifically at line 860. This suggests that a command or script invoked at that point encountered an error.

The subsequent errors in the make hierarchy point to a broader issue, possibly related to the gdb_merge target. This target might be involved in merging or processing GDB-related files or configurations.]


Answer: Issue: Target all from Makefile resulted in an error.
Resolution: Missing Dependencies:

Ensure that all required dependencies, including system libraries and development packages, are installed and accessible to the build system.
Check if there are specific dependencies for the aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu target architecture.
Configuration Issues:

Review the project's configuration files (e.g., configure, Makefile) to identify any incorrect settings or missing options.
Verify that the build system is correctly configured for the target architecture and platform.
Build Script Errors:

Examine the build scripts (e.g., shell scripts, Python scripts) for errors in logic or syntax.
Look for any specific errors or warnings reported during the build process.
Compiler or Toolchain Problems:

Ensure that the compiler and toolchain (e.g., GCC, Clang) are correctly installed and configured.
Check for any known issues or bugs in the specific compiler or toolchain version being used.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
make[2]: *** [Makefile:860: all] Error 2

crash build failed

make[1]: *** [Makefile:266: gdb_merge] Error 1

Answer: The primary error message indicates a failure in the all target of the Makefile, specifically at line 860. This suggests that a command or script invoked at that point encountered an error.

The subsequent errors in the make hierarchy point to a broader issue, possibly related to the gdb_merge target. This target might be involved in merging or processing GDB-related files or configurations.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/avocado-plugins-vt-109.0-build/BUILDROOT%{python3_sitelib}/avocado_vt/conf.d/*': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZIVKZp (%install)
]: [%install part failed]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because files does not exist
Resolution: Check the %file part to make sure the required files are included
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/avocado-plugins-vt-109.0-build/BUILDROOT%{python3_sitelib}/avocado_vt/conf.d/*': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZIVKZp (%install)


Answer: %install part failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(pytest-testinfra) < 11~~ with python3dist(pytest-testinfra) >= 10.1)
]: [dependency that cannot be installed]


Answer: Issue: There's not a suitable package providing pytest-testinfra Python dependency
Resolution: If possible, relax the requirements on the version, if not, package the dependency first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(pytest-testinfra) < 11~~ with python3dist(pytest-testinfra) >= 10.1)


Answer: dependency that cannot be installed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
error: Couldn't download https://github.com/hyprwm/${name}/archive/v0.2.0/hyprlock-0.2.0.tar.]: [there is typo in %{name} macro]


Answer: Issue: because there is typo in name macro
Resolution: there should be %{name} instead of ${name}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

error: Couldn't download https://github.com/hyprwm/${name}/archive/v0.2.0/hyprlock-0.2.0.tar.

Answer: there is typo in %{name} macro
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [gmake[2]: *** [wrappers/python/CMakeFiles/cython3_freenect.dir/build.make:77: wrappers/python/freenect3.c] Segmentation fault (core dumped)]: [The cython process crashed.]


Answer: Issue: There is a bug in the cython program.
Resolution: Report the problem to cython developers.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gmake[2]: *** [wrappers/python/CMakeFiles/cython3_freenect.dir/build.make:77: wrappers/python/freenect3.c] Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Answer: The cython process crashed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XzD92k: line 46: autoreconf: command not found
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XzD92k (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XzD92k (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1]: [Indication of missing autoreconf.]


Answer: Issue: There was a missing command "autoreconf", which is needed for frr compilation.
Resolution: Check the specfile; if autoreconf is not added as BuildRequires, add it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XzD92k: line 46: autoreconf: command not found
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XzD92k (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XzD92k (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1

Answer: Indication of missing autoreconf.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/neovim-0.11.0~dev.1248.g864f25d6b-1.fc42.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 25 seconds]: [General indication of exception encountered during build.]
=============
[No match for argument: utf8proc-devel > 2.9.0]: [Requested package `utf8proc-devel` of version `> 2.9.0` was not found.]
=============
[WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s]: [Attempt to install dependencies using DNF5 has failed due to aforementioned error. Another attempt will be performed.]
=============
[[2024-11-28 13:50:58,732][ ERROR][PID:3004741] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failure]: [Build process didn't end in success state as no success file was written.]


Answer: Issue: Package `utf8proc-devel > 2.9.0` was not available, causing failure of the build process, as it was a dependency.
Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies are available during build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/neovim-0.11.0~dev.1248.g864f25d6b-1.fc42.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 25 seconds

Answer: General indication of exception encountered during build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: utf8proc-devel > 2.9.0

Answer: Requested package `utf8proc-devel` of version `> 2.9.0` was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s

Answer: Attempt to install dependencies using DNF5 has failed due to aforementioned error. Another attempt will be performed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[2024-11-28 13:50:58,732][ ERROR][PID:3004741] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failure

Answer: Build process didn't end in success state as no success file was written.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: 
 Problem: package python3-dnf-4.23.0-1.1.noarch from @System conflicts with python3-dnf-plugins-core < 4.7.0 provided by python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.4.4-2.4.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests]: [This section identifies the error]


Answer: Issue: There is a conflict between the python3-dnf package provided by the base image and the python3-dnf-plugins package that is part of the normal update flow.
Resolution: The problem cannot be fixed by the user. The image maintainer must solve the issue by removing the conflict.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: 
 Problem: package python3-dnf-4.23.0-1.1.noarch from @System conflicts with python3-dnf-plugins-core < 4.7.0 provided by python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.4.4-2.4.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests

Answer: This section identifies the error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-pyqt6-6.9.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/PyQt6-6.9.1.dist-info]: [It's mentions what is the error and exactly points out to the missing file.]


Answer: Issue: The file listed as installed in %files section was not found (was not installed) during the build.
Resolution: As you can see in the build log above in the %install section, the file is just named differently. It's no longer PyQt6-6.9.1.dist-info, but it's pyqt6-6.9.1.dist-info. The fix in this case is just to fix the name to not have any capital letter.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-pyqt6-6.9.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/PyQt6-6.9.1.dist-info

Answer: It's mentions what is the error and exactly points out to the missing file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [configure.ac:17: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_ICONV
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.]: [Error message from configure script]
=============
[configure.ac:23: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GETTEXT
autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1]: [Error message from configure script]


Answer: Issue: AM_ICONV and AM_GNU_GETTEXT macros are undefined
Resolution: Those macros are related to gettext check correct gettext packages are installed in correct versions
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
configure.ac:17: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_ICONV
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.

Answer: Error message from configure script
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
configure.ac:23: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GETTEXT
autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1

Answer: Error message from configure script
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error:
 Problem: package rocm-comgr-16.1-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates requires libLLVM-16.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rocm-comgr-16.1-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates requires libLLVM-16.so(LLVM_16)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both llvm-libs-16.0.0-2.fc38.x86_64 from fedora and llvm-libs-17.0.6-5.fc38.x86_64 from copr_base
  - cannot install both llvm-libs-16.0.6-3.fc38.x86_64 from updates and llvm-libs-17.0.6-5.fc38.x86_64 from copr_base
  - package rocm-comgr-devel-16.1-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates requires rocm-comgr(x86-64) = 16.1-2.fc38, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package llvm-devel-17.0.6-5.fc38.x86_64 from copr_base requires llvm-libs(x86-64) = 17.0.6-5.fc38, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [The same package 'llvm-libs' are offered by different repositories and are in conflict with one another.]


Answer: Issue: Package has dependencies which can not be successfully resolved. 
Resolution: Ensure that all required packages are available and that individual repos don't offer conflicting versions of the same package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error:
 Problem: package rocm-comgr-16.1-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates requires libLLVM-16.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rocm-comgr-16.1-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates requires libLLVM-16.so(LLVM_16)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both llvm-libs-16.0.0-2.fc38.x86_64 from fedora and llvm-libs-17.0.6-5.fc38.x86_64 from copr_base
  - cannot install both llvm-libs-16.0.6-3.fc38.x86_64 from updates and llvm-libs-17.0.6-5.fc38.x86_64 from copr_base
  - package rocm-comgr-devel-16.1-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates requires rocm-comgr(x86-64) = 16.1-2.fc38, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package llvm-devel-17.0.6-5.fc38.x86_64 from copr_base requires llvm-libs(x86-64) = 17.0.6-5.fc38, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job

Answer: The same package 'llvm-libs' are offered by different repositories and are in conflict with one another.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-pg8000-1.29.1-1.fc37.noarch from copr_ba]: [It says that package python(abi) = 3.11 could not be installed.]


Answer: Issue: The package python(abi) = 3.11 could not be installed (dependency for python3-pg8000-1.29.1-1.fc37.noarch) .
Resolution: Either add a correct rpm repository providing the package or try to install with --skip-broken parameter.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-pg8000-1.29.1-1.fc37.noarch from copr_ba

Answer: It says that package python(abi) = 3.11 could not be installed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [compress.c: In function 'uncompresszlib':
compress.c:622:9: error: 'rc' undeclared (first use in this function)
  622 |         rc;
      |         ^~
compress.c:622:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
make[3]: *** [Makefile:579: compress.lo] Error 1]: [This is a compilation error. The variable rc from the file compress.c on line 622 has no declared type on its first use in the function.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed because the package was unable to compile.
Resolution: Declare a type of the variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
compress.c: In function 'uncompresszlib':
compress.c:622:9: error: 'rc' undeclared (first use in this function)
  622 |         rc;
      |         ^~
compress.c:622:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
make[3]: *** [Makefile:579: compress.lo] Error 1

Answer: This is a compilation error. The variable rc from the file compress.c on line 622 has no declared type on its first use in the function.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: No source number 1]: [Sources are missing]
=============
[ERROR: Neither source directory '.' nor build directory 'redhat-linux-build' contain a build file meson.build.]: [Missing meson.build file]


Answer: Issue: There's no meson.build file
Resolution: Properly provide the meson.build file or identify what build system should be used instead.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: No source number 1

Answer: Sources are missing
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Neither source directory '.' nor build directory 'redhat-linux-build' contain a build file meson.build.

Answer: Missing meson.build file
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [State.xs: In function ‘XS_Coro__Util_time’:
State.xs:4576:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘nvtime’; expected 0, have 1
 4576 |         RETVAL = nvtime (aTHX);
      |                  ^~~~~~]: [A compiler complains on a mismatch between arguments of nvtime() when it is called and when it was declared.]


Answer: Issue: GCC 15 moved to C23 language standard and empty argument list now means no arguments.
Resolution: The nvtime() declaration needs to be corrected to match how the function is defined.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
State.xs: In function ‘XS_Coro__Util_time’:
State.xs:4576:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘nvtime’; expected 0, have 1
 4576 |         RETVAL = nvtime (aTHX);
      |                  ^~~~~~

Answer: A compiler complains on a mismatch between arguments of nvtime() when it is called and when it was declared.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
******************** TEST 'MLIR :: Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 2
rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp || true
# executed command: rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp
# RUN: at line 3
/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/mlir-opt /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/mlir/test/Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir -mlir-print-ir-tree-dir=/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp    -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(cse,canonicalize)))'    -mlir-print-ir-before=cse
# executed command: /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/mlir-opt /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/mlir/test/Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir -mlir-print-ir-tree-dir=/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp '-pass-pipeline=builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(cse,canonicalize)))' -mlir-print-ir-before=cse
# .---command stderr------------
# | mlir-opt: for the --mlir-print-ir-before option: Cannot find option named 'cse'!
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 1

--


Answer: This shows the output that was gathered for the execution of test 'TEST 'MLIR :: Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir' FAILED'. It might contain insights into why the test TEST 'MLIR :: Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir' FAILED failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.5.36 with crate(clap/default) < 5.0.0~)]: [Missing dependency clap/default with version >= 4.5.36]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:459:   Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/wrap_help) >= 4.5.36 with crate(clap/wrap_help) < 5.0.0~)]: [Missing dependency clap/wrap_help with version >= 4.5.36]


Answer: Issue: Build of the rust package failed since some of its dependencies are not packaged in Fedora in the required versions
Resolution: To fix the build of the Rust package, first package all its dependencies for Fedora, or if they are already packaged, update them to the required versions.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/default) >= 4.5.36 with crate(clap/default) < 5.0.0~)

Answer: Missing dependency clap/default with version >= 4.5.36
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:   Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(clap/wrap_help) >= 4.5.36 with crate(clap/wrap_help) < 5.0.0~)

Answer: Missing dependency clap/wrap_help with version >= 4.5.36
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [npm error Could not resolve dependency:
npm error peer vite@"^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0" from @vitejs/plugin-vue@5.2.4
npm error node_modules/@vitejs/plugin-vue
npm error   dev @vitejs/plugin-vue@"5.2.4" from the root project]: [Error message with the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: One of the dependencies is too old to be compatible with the package.
Resolution: Make sure that the dependency is available in the minimal necessary version.  Alternatively, if the version check is too strict, try lowering it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
npm error Could not resolve dependency:
npm error peer vite@"^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0" from @vitejs/plugin-vue@5.2.4
npm error node_modules/@vitejs/plugin-vue
npm error   dev @vitejs/plugin-vue@"5.2.4" from the root project

Answer: Error message with the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ %meson -D crypto=openssl -D krb5=disabled -D mysql=enabled -D postgresql=enabled -D netconf=disabled
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JXdcXn: line 72: fg: no job control]: [it shows %meson macro failed to be executed]


Answer: Issue: missing meson in BuildRequires
Resolution: Add meson to BuildRequires
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ %meson -D crypto=openssl -D krb5=disabled -D mysql=enabled -D postgresql=enabled -D netconf=disabled
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JXdcXn: line 72: fg: no job control

Answer: it shows %meson macro failed to be executed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [fe-secure-openssl.c:66:10: fatal error: openssl/engine.h: No such file or directory
   66 | #include <openssl/engine.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [It shows a compilation error which prevents from progressing the build process.]


Answer: Issue: Build-required openssl-devel-1:3.2.2-3.fc41 moved a support for engines to a deprecated openssl-engine-devel package <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpensslDeprecateEngine>.
Resolution: Add "BuildRequires: openssl-engine-devel" into the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
fe-secure-openssl.c:66:10: fatal error: openssl/engine.h: No such file or directory
   66 | #include <openssl/engine.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: It shows a compilation error which prevents from progressing the build process.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Cannot read /home/vmihalko/fedora/file/file-5.47-magic-entriess.patch]: [This snippet describes a file that should be part of the package but is missing.]


Answer: Issue: Because required file (patch in this case) is missing. 
Resolution: You should check the spelling of the required file and the uploaded file, and then verify that you’ve run git add on the relevant file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Cannot read /home/vmihalko/fedora/file/file-5.47-magic-entriess.patch

Answer: This snippet describes a file that should be part of the package but is missing.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ !! Copr timeout => sending INT]: [It tells you that the build took too long to complete]


Answer: Issue: The build took too long for the given timeout to complete in time.
Resolution: Increase the timeout of the copr builder or find a high performance builder.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 !! Copr timeout => sending INT

Answer: It tells you that the build took too long to complete
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [node:assert:95
  throw new AssertionError(obj);
  ^
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly equal:
+ actual - expected
+ '\nfiller\n'
- 'goodbye\n'
    at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs22-22.15.1-build/node-v22.15.1/test/parallel/test-child-process-stdout-flush-exit.js:54:12)
    at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs22-22.15.1-build/node-v22.15.1/test/common/index.js:435:15)
    at ChildProcess.emit (node:events:518:28)
    at maybeClose (node:internal/child_process:1101:16)
    at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:304:5) {
  generatedMessage: true,
  code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
  actual: '\nfiller\n',
  expected: 'goodbye\n',
  operator: 'strictEqual'
}
Node.js v22.15.1]: [Issue in check section - test failing]


Answer: Issue: Test failed due to a flaky nature of parallel tests, race condition
Resolution: Either don't make all test fails, fail the build or just rerun the build