fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M ec9af141fd814a06a7662034669d845e -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1741087211.456179/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.xamr75z1:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/dnf5.spec'

Answer: Build command has failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [=================================== FAILURES ===================================
______________________ TestFuzzIsisTLV.test_exit_cleanly _______________________
self = <test_fuzz_isis_tlv.TestFuzzIsisTLV object at 0x7fca727eb820>
    def testfunction(self):
        self._run_tests()
        result = self.testresults[matchfunction]
        if result is not None:
>           frrsix.reraise(*result)
helpers/python/frrtest.py:108: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
helpers/python/frrsix.py:62: in reraise
    raise value
helpers/python/frrtest.py:82: in _run_tests
    test(self)
helpers/python/frrtest.py:100: in matchfunction
    method(self, *args, **kwargs)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
self = <test_fuzz_isis_tlv.TestFuzzIsisTLV object at 0x7fca727eb820>
    def _exit_cleanly(self):
        if self.exitcode != 0:
>           raise MultiTestFailure("Program did not terminate with exit code 0")
E           frrtest.MultiTestFailure: Program did not terminate with exit code 0
helpers/python/frrtest.py:90: MultiTestFailure
----------------------------- Captured stderr call -----------------------------
isis fuzztest: showing active allocations in memory group logging subsystem
isis fuzztest: showing active allocations in memory group libfrr
isis fuzztest: memstats:  Temporary memory              :      2 * (variably sized)
isis fuzztest: showing active allocations in memory group isisd
----- generated xml file: /builddir/build/BUILD/frr-8.5.3/tests/tests.xml ------
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED isisd/test_fuzz_isis_tlv.py::TestFuzzIsisTLV::test_exit_cleanly - frrt...
================== 1 failed, 439 passed, 5 skipped in 47.16s ===================]: [Indication of the result of running upstream unit test of the package.]


Answer: Issue: Unit test fails, which blocks the build.
Resolution: It is not clear why the test failed. After discussion with upstream, the test was waived.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
______________________ TestFuzzIsisTLV.test_exit_cleanly _______________________
self = <test_fuzz_isis_tlv.TestFuzzIsisTLV object at 0x7fca727eb820>
    def testfunction(self):
        self._run_tests()
        result = self.testresults[matchfunction]
        if result is not None:
>           frrsix.reraise(*result)
helpers/python/frrtest.py:108: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
helpers/python/frrsix.py:62: in reraise
    raise value
helpers/python/frrtest.py:82: in _run_tests
    test(self)
helpers/python/frrtest.py:100: in matchfunction
    method(self, *args, **kwargs)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
self = <test_fuzz_isis_tlv.TestFuzzIsisTLV object at 0x7fca727eb820>
    def _exit_cleanly(self):
        if self.exitcode != 0:
>           raise MultiTestFailure("Program did not terminate with exit code 0")
E           frrtest.MultiTestFailure: Program did not terminate with exit code 0
helpers/python/frrtest.py:90: MultiTestFailure
----------------------------- Captured stderr call -----------------------------
isis fuzztest: showing active allocations in memory group logging subsystem
isis fuzztest: showing active allocations in memory group libfrr
isis fuzztest: memstats:  Temporary memory              :      2 * (variably sized)
isis fuzztest: showing active allocations in memory group isisd
----- generated xml file: /builddir/build/BUILD/frr-8.5.3/tests/tests.xml ------
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED isisd/test_fuzz_isis_tlv.py::TestFuzzIsisTLV::test_exit_cleanly - frrt...
================== 1 failed, 439 passed, 5 skipped in 47.16s ===================

Answer: Indication of the result of running upstream unit test of the package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [203:11.54 /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-128.9.2-build/thunderbird-128.9.2/toolkit/components/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/generated_message_tctable_lite.cc: In static member function ‘static const char* google::protobuf::internal::TcParser::FastUnknownEnumFallback(google::protobuf::MessageLite*, const char*, google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*, const google::protobuf::internal::TcParseTableBase*, uint64_t, google::protobuf::internal::TcFieldData)’:
203:11.54 /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-128.9.2-build/thunderbird-128.9.2/toolkit/components/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/generated_message_tctable_lite.cc:993:43: error: cannot tail-call: target is not able to optimize the call into a sibling call
203:11.54   993 |   PROTOBUF_MUSTTAIL return table->fallback(PROTOBUF_TC_PARAM_PASS);
203:11.54       |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
]: [Compiling a source code file with gcc failed.]


Answer: Issue: The source code compilation fails because the code uses the musttail attribute for a function, but the compiler target does not support it.
Resolution: Omit setting the musttail attribute for the affected function.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
203:11.54 /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-128.9.2-build/thunderbird-128.9.2/toolkit/components/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/generated_message_tctable_lite.cc: In static member function ‘static const char* google::protobuf::internal::TcParser::FastUnknownEnumFallback(google::protobuf::MessageLite*, const char*, google::protobuf::internal::ParseContext*, const google::protobuf::internal::TcParseTableBase*, uint64_t, google::protobuf::internal::TcFieldData)’:
203:11.54 /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-128.9.2-build/thunderbird-128.9.2/toolkit/components/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/generated_message_tctable_lite.cc:993:43: error: cannot tail-call: target is not able to optimize the call into a sibling call
203:11.54   993 |   PROTOBUF_MUSTTAIL return table->fallback(PROTOBUF_TC_PARAM_PASS);
203:11.54       |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Answer: Compiling a source code file with gcc failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [rope/base/ast.py:12: in <module>
    assert sys.version_info < (3, 8)
E   AssertionError
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dW9Ket (%check)]: [Its the place where exactly error can be seen]


Answer: Issue: test case assertion function call failed
Resolution: Fix the failed assertion test case file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
rope/base/ast.py:12: in <module>
    assert sys.version_info < (3, 8)
E   AssertionError
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dW9Ket (%check)

Answer: Its the place where exactly error can be seen
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CMake Error: Not a file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/Release.cmake]: [It indicates that a cache file is missing for CMake.]


Answer: Issue: I forgot to to list the `Release.cmake` cache as a source in the spec file. If you forgot this, it will not be included in the source RPM (SRPM) from which the RPM will be built.
Resolution: List the Release.cmake file as a source in the spec file for it to be part of the source RPM (SRPM):

Source1009: Release.cmake
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error: Not a file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/Release.cmake

Answer: It indicates that a cache file is missing for CMake.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/git init -q
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.fQS1pZ: line 47: /usr/bin/git: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.fQS1pZ (%prep)]: [Error report during %prep phase.]


Answer: Issue: git was missing from BuildRequires. It is used for `%autosetup -S git` macro.
Resolution: Add git to the list of BuildRequires dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/git init -q
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.fQS1pZ: line 47: /usr/bin/git: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.fQS1pZ (%prep)

Answer: Error report during %prep phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [UUlib.xs: In function ‘initialise’:
UUlib.xs:216:58: error: too many arguments to function ‘UUstrerror’; expected 0, have 1
  216 |     croak ("unable to initialize uudeview library (%s)", UUstrerror (retval));
      |                                                          ^~~~~~~~~~  ~~~~~~
]: [A compiler error complains on a mismatch between UUstrerror() prototype and the call.]


Answer: Issue: GCC 15 moved to C23 language standard which changed a meaning of empty argument list to mean no arguments.
Resolution: UUstrerror() prototype needs to be corrected to accept a single argument of int type.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
UUlib.xs: In function ‘initialise’:
UUlib.xs:216:58: error: too many arguments to function ‘UUstrerror’; expected 0, have 1
  216 |     croak ("unable to initialize uudeview library (%s)", UUstrerror (retval));
      |                                                          ^~~~~~~~~~  ~~~~~~


Answer: A compiler error complains on a mismatch between UUstrerror() prototype and the call.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Program run-clang-tidy found: NO]: [Missing dependency run-clang-tidy]
=============
[meson.build:2860:17: ERROR: Program 'run-clang-tidy' not found or not executable]: [Meson didn't find required dependency run-clang-tidy]


Answer: Issue: There is a missing dependency, run-clang-tidy, which is required.
Resolution: Add build dependency on run-clang-tidy
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Program run-clang-tidy found: NO

Answer: Missing dependency run-clang-tidy
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meson.build:2860:17: ERROR: Program 'run-clang-tidy' not found or not executable

Answer: Meson didn't find required dependency run-clang-tidy
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:233 (message):
  Could NOT find Python3 (missing: Python3_NumPy_INCLUDE_DIRS NumPy) (found
  suitable version "3.14.0", minimum required is "3.8")]: [The build system CMake raised an error during a build.
It looks like there is missing python3 dependency NumPy. The NumPy supporting python 3.8 version or higher is not available during the build.]
=============
[Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:603 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
  /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPython/Support.cmake:4002 (find_package_handle_standard_args)
  /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPython3.cmake:602 (include)
  /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-19.1.6-build/llvm-project-19.1.6.src/mlir/cmake/modules/MLIRDetectPythonEnv.cmake:21 (find_package)
  /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-19.1.6-build/llvm-project-19.1.6.src/mlir/CMakeLists.txt:168 (mlir_configure_python_dev_packages)]: [The CMake build system returned a Call Stack which shows error happened during the build/configuration.]
=============
[-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pOh03V (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pOh03V (%build)
]: [The configuration step of the rpm build process ended with error.]


Answer: Issue: There is missing dependency for CMake. The Python3_NumPy_INCLUDE_DIRS fails during the build process.
Resolution: Please verify that NumPy python3 package is available in the build environment.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:233 (message):
  Could NOT find Python3 (missing: Python3_NumPy_INCLUDE_DIRS NumPy) (found
  suitable version "3.14.0", minimum required is "3.8")

Answer: The build system CMake raised an error during a build.
It looks like there is missing python3 dependency NumPy. The NumPy supporting python 3.8 version or higher is not available during the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:603 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
  /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPython/Support.cmake:4002 (find_package_handle_standard_args)
  /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPython3.cmake:602 (include)
  /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-19.1.6-build/llvm-project-19.1.6.src/mlir/cmake/modules/MLIRDetectPythonEnv.cmake:21 (find_package)
  /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-19.1.6-build/llvm-project-19.1.6.src/mlir/CMakeLists.txt:168 (mlir_configure_python_dev_packages)

Answer: The CMake build system returned a Call Stack which shows error happened during the build/configuration.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pOh03V (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pOh03V (%build)


Answer: The configuration step of the rpm build process ended with error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/velocity-2.4.1-build/velocity-2.4.1/velocity-engine-core/src/main/java/org/apache/velocity/runtime/parser/node/Node.java:[94,21] error: cannot find symbol
  symbol:   class StandardParserVisitor
  location: interface Node]: [Maven build error related to the compiler not finding appropriate dependency symbols during compilation.]
=============
[[ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/velocity-2.4.1-build/velocity-2.4.1/velocity-engine-core/src/main/java/org/apache/velocity/runtime/parser/node/Node.java:[111,26] error: cannot find symbol
  symbol:   class StandardParserVisitor
  location: interface Node]: [Maven build error related to the compiler not finding appropriate dependency symbols during compilation.]
=============
[[ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/velocity-2.4.1-build/velocity-2.4.1/velocity-engine-core/src/main/java/org/apache/velocity/runtime/parser/node/SimpleNode.java:[238,28] error: cannot find symbol
  symbol:   class StandardParserVisitor
  location: class SimpleNode]: [Maven build error related to the compiler not finding appropriate dependency symbols during compilation.]


Answer: Issue: Symbols used in the source code were not resolved by the Java compiler.
Resolution: Find where the missing symbol comes from. The solution may be to update the library dependency, check the Java compile source path, or maybe generated sources were not generated correctly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/velocity-2.4.1-build/velocity-2.4.1/velocity-engine-core/src/main/java/org/apache/velocity/runtime/parser/node/Node.java:[94,21] error: cannot find symbol
  symbol:   class StandardParserVisitor
  location: interface Node

Answer: Maven build error related to the compiler not finding appropriate dependency symbols during compilation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/velocity-2.4.1-build/velocity-2.4.1/velocity-engine-core/src/main/java/org/apache/velocity/runtime/parser/node/Node.java:[111,26] error: cannot find symbol
  symbol:   class StandardParserVisitor
  location: interface Node

Answer: Maven build error related to the compiler not finding appropriate dependency symbols during compilation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] /builddir/build/BUILD/velocity-2.4.1-build/velocity-2.4.1/velocity-engine-core/src/main/java/org/apache/velocity/runtime/parser/node/SimpleNode.java:[238,28] error: cannot find symbol
  symbol:   class StandardParserVisitor
  location: class SimpleNode

Answer: Maven build error related to the compiler not finding appropriate dependency symbols during compilation.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: checkpolicy >= 3.8
]: [Missing checkpolicy dependency of the required version]
=============
[No match for argument: policycoreutils-devel >= 3.8
]: [Missing policycoreutils-devel of required version]


Answer: Issue: There are missing dependencies (with specific version requirements)
Resolution: Relax the version requirements, if possible, otherwise package the required dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: checkpolicy >= 3.8


Answer: Missing checkpolicy dependency of the required version
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: policycoreutils-devel >= 3.8


Answer: Missing policycoreutils-devel of required version
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Test failure message:]: [Test suite error message]
=============
[    throw err;]: [Test suite error message]


Answer: Issue: Test from package test suite failed.
Resolution: Fix code that was test testing, unfortunately no detailed test logs were provided.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Test failure message:

Answer: Test suite error message
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    throw err;

Answer: Test suite error message
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install both fuse3-libs-3.17.1-1.fc43.x86_64 from copr_base and fuse3-libs-3.16.2-5.fc42.x86_64 from fedora
  - package freerdp-libs-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libfuse3.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-libs-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libfuse3.so.3(FUSE_3.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package fuse3-devel-3.17.1-1.fc43.x86_64 from copr_base requires libfuse3.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package fuse3-devel-3.17.1-1.fc43.x86_64 from copr_base requires fuse3-libs = 3.17.1-1.fc43, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-devel-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libfreerdp3.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-devel-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libfreerdp-client3.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-devel-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libfreerdp-server3.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-devel-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libfreerdp-server-proxy3.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-devel-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libfreerdp-shadow-subsystem3.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-devel-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libfreerdp-shadow3.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-devel-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires librdtk0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package freerdp-devel-2:3.12.0-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires freerdp-libs(x86-64) = 2:3.12.0-2.fc43, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates

Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: This is where the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/neovim-0.11.0_dev.1664.e71d2c817-build/neovim/src/nvim/lua/treesitter.c:221:27: error: implicit declaration of function âts_language_abi_versionâ; did you mean âts_language_versionâ? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  221 |   uint32_t lang_version = ts_language_abi_version(lang);
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                           ts_language_version]: [Function `ts_language_abi_version` was used without previous declaration. It is possible that a typo is cause of the problem, since function `ts_language_version` does exist.]
=============
[gmake: *** [Makefile:159: all] Error 2]: [General gmake message, indicating failure of execution on Makefile file line 159, of target `all`.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed during compilation of source code, due to use of previously undeclared function `ts_language_abi_version`. 
Resolution: In C and many other compiled languages, one can not reference a function without previously declaring its signature. Check your source code, and insert function declaration at an appropriate location.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/neovim-0.11.0_dev.1664.e71d2c817-build/neovim/src/nvim/lua/treesitter.c:221:27: error: implicit declaration of function âts_language_abi_versionâ; did you mean âts_language_versionâ? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  221 |   uint32_t lang_version = ts_language_abi_version(lang);
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                           ts_language_version

Answer: Function `ts_language_abi_version` was used without previous declaration. It is possible that a typo is cause of the problem, since function `ts_language_version` does exist.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gmake: *** [Makefile:159: all] Error 2

Answer: General gmake message, indicating failure of execution on Makefile file line 159, of target `all`.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [This is a general error message stating that the build system was unable to find and install the optimal package to fulfill a specific dependency.]
=============
[  - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch from copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_10
]: [This part specifies the exact dependency problem.
nim-srpm-macros: This is the package name that's missing.
redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch: This is the package that requires nim-srpm-macros.
copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_10: This is the repository from which the redhat-rpm-config package is being pulled.]


Answer: Issue: The RPM build failed because it couldn't find the required package nim-srpm-macros. This package is a dependency of redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch, which is being pulled from the copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_10 repository.
Resolution: Track down package nim-srpm-macros. Contact owner of the package and work with them on a resolution.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job

Answer: This is a general error message stating that the build system was unable to find and install the optimal package to fulfill a specific dependency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch from copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_10


Answer: This part specifies the exact dependency problem.
nim-srpm-macros: This is the package name that's missing.
redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch: This is the package that requires nim-srpm-macros.
copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_10: This is the repository from which the redhat-rpm-config package is being pulled.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error:]: [Error header]
=============
[Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/mariadb.conf]: [Error description]


Answer: Issue: RPM build - Installed but unpackaged file found
Resolution: Add the file to the %files section of the SPECfile or remove the file in %install section
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error:

Answer: Error header
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/mariadb.conf

Answer: Error description
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 7f9bc3da00eb41398ea091ef5cd607f2 -D /var/lib/mock/centos-stream-9-x86_64-1749005413.609961/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.kf454ns0:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/dnf.spec']: [It shows the rpmbuild command that failed.]
=============
[error: /builddir/build/originals/dnf.spec: line 285: Unknown option V in ctest(:-:)]: [It shows why the rpmbuild command failed.]


Answer: Issue: The spec file used for the build (dnf.spec) contains an unknown option V in ctest.
Resolution: The dnf.spec file has to be updated. The unknown option could be removed or replaced by some supported option.
In addition we could figure out why this option isn't supported while it works on other platforms.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 7f9bc3da00eb41398ea091ef5cd607f2 -D /var/lib/mock/centos-stream-9-x86_64-1749005413.609961/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.kf454ns0:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/dnf.spec'

Answer: It shows the rpmbuild command that failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: /builddir/build/originals/dnf.spec: line 285: Unknown option V in ctest(:-:)

Answer: It shows why the rpmbuild command failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [o/main.c:1475:14: error: ‘bfd_mach_common64’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘bfd_mach_msp26’?
 1475 |       i.mach=OUTPUT_MACH;
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~]: [Fatal GCC error which caused the build failure.]
=============
[gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./h  -I h -I /usr/include/tirpc   -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fsigned-char -pipe -fcommon -fno-builtin-malloc -fno-builtin-free -fno-PIE -fno-pie -fno-PIC -fno-pic -std=gnu17 -Wall -Wno-empty-body -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -mlongcall  -I/usr/include/tirpc   -O2 -I o  -c -o o/main.o o/main.c]: [GCC invocation which lead to the failure.]


Answer: Issue: The bfd_mach_common64 function is not declared in the respective compilation unit.
Resolution: Declare in the bfd_mach_common64 function, either manually or by including the respective header.  Alternatively, check that the compiler invocation is correct.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
o/main.c:1475:14: error: ‘bfd_mach_common64’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘bfd_mach_msp26’?
 1475 |       i.mach=OUTPUT_MACH;
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Fatal GCC error which caused the build failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./h  -I h -I /usr/include/tirpc   -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fsigned-char -pipe -fcommon -fno-builtin-malloc -fno-builtin-free -fno-PIE -fno-pie -fno-PIC -fno-pic -std=gnu17 -Wall -Wno-empty-body -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -mlongcall  -I/usr/include/tirpc   -O2 -I o  -c -o o/main.o o/main.c

Answer: GCC invocation which lead to the failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  No matching package to install: 'iniparser-devel'
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package rpm-4.19.1.1-12.el10.ppc64le is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package sed-4.9-3.el10.ppc64le is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:459:  Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [dnf complains about a missing package during buildroot setup (iniparser-devel).]


Answer: Issue: Buildroot setup failed because dnf failed to install required build dependencies (iniparser-devel). In this particular case it's because the iniparser package is not built in EPEL10.
Resolution: Make sure all package (build) dependencies are spelled correctly and are available in respective repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  No matching package to install: 'iniparser-devel'
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package rpm-4.19.1.1-12.el10.ppc64le is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package sed-4.9-3.el10.ppc64le is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:459:  Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: dnf complains about a missing package during buildroot setup (iniparser-devel).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/cmd.py:135: SetuptoolsDeprecationWarning: bdist_wheel.universal is deprecated
!!

        ********************************************************************************
        With Python 2.7 end-of-life, support for building universal wheels
        (i.e., wheels that support both Python 2 and Python 3)
        is being obviated.
        Please discontinue using this option, or if you still need it,
        file an issue with pypa/setuptools describing your use case.

        By 2025-Aug-30, you need to update your project and remove deprecated calls
        or your builds will no longer be supported.
        ********************************************************************************

!!

Answer: Warning not relevant for this build, but makes sense to consider while debugging python2.7 applications in the future.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
INFO: Going to install missing dynamic buildrequires
Updating and loading repositories:
 fedora                                 100% |  78.7 KiB/s |  28.4 KiB |  00m00s
 Copr repository                        100% |  57.0 KiB/s |   1.5 KiB |  00m00s
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.18.1-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-devel-3.14.0~b2-3.fc43.x86_64" is already installed.
Package "python3-packaging-25.0-3.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pip-25.1.1-4.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pip-25.1.1-4.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-setuptools-78.1.1-7.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-requests-2.32.4-1.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.13dist(certifi) >= 2017.4.17 needed by python3-requests-2.32.4-1.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.13dist(charset-normalizer) < 4~~ with python3.13dist(charset-normalizer) >= 2) needed by python3-requests-2.32.4-1.fc43.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.13dist(idna) < 4~~ with python3.13dist(idna) >= 2.5) needed by python3-requests-2.32.4-1.fc43.noarch from copr_base
You can try to add to command line:

Answer: Missing dynamic buildrequires packages seem to be the culprit for this build failure