fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:10 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'systemctl status --no-pager sendmail ' (Expected 0, got 3)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:10 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Already started service (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:15 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'systemctl status --no-pager sendmail' (Expected 0, got 3)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:16 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Restarting of service (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:21 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'systemctl status --no-pager sendmail ' (Expected 0, got 3)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:36 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: File /var/run/sendmail.pid should exist 


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] ::  Starting service for restarting under nonpriv user (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:52 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Service have to implement start function (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:57 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Service have to implement restart function (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:41:02 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Service have to implement status function (Expected 0, got 3)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:41:17 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Service have to implement reload function (Expected 0,3, got 1)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [meson.build:280:10: ERROR: Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconfig]: ["systemd" is not foudn as a dependency by meson.build]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 665829041bcf4c3db56a3c512ac8dc46 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1746776165.100666/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.a7lj8nrm:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/pipewire.spec']: [Container is unable to spawn due to missing dependency, "systemd"]


Answer: Issue: Missing dependency "systemd"
Resolution: Possibly, installing systemd-devel might help meson.build to discover systemd
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meson.build:280:10: ERROR: Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconfig

Answer: "systemd" is not foudn as a dependency by meson.build
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 665829041bcf4c3db56a3c512ac8dc46 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1746776165.100666/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.a7lj8nrm:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/pipewire.spec'

Answer: Container is unable to spawn due to missing dependency, "systemd"
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Processing files: osgearth-3.6.1-2.fc41.i686
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/osgearth-3.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/libosgEarth*.so.3.6.1
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/osgearth-3.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/libosgEarth*.so.158
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/osgearth-3.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/osgPlugins-3.6.5/osgdb_*.so
]: [Some files haven't been found when the build wants to write the binary rpms.]


Answer: Issue: The files specified by the maintainer in the %files section of the spec file to be present in the /usr/lib directory have not been found because they were installed into the /usr/lib64 directory. Seems the LIB_INSTALL_DIR variable has been ignored.
Resolution: Inspection of the project's CMakeLists.txt is required and proper override for the library destination directory is likely needed when the build configuration step is executed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Processing files: osgearth-3.6.1-2.fc41.i686
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/osgearth-3.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/libosgEarth*.so.3.6.1
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/osgearth-3.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/libosgEarth*.so.158
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/osgearth-3.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/osgPlugins-3.6.5/osgdb_*.so


Answer: Some files haven't been found when the build wants to write the binary rpms.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [cmd: ['dist-git-client', 'sources']
cwd: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-agh4tp54/watchman
rc: 1
stdout: 
stderr: INFO: Reading stdout from command: git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
ERROR: Exactly one spec file expected in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-agh4tp54/watchman/. directory, 0 found]: [Spec file is missing for the build.]


Answer: Issue: Spec file is not available so SRPM can't be created.
Resolution: Please make sure that the spec file is available during build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
cmd: ['dist-git-client', 'sources']
cwd: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-agh4tp54/watchman
rc: 1
stdout: 
stderr: INFO: Reading stdout from command: git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
ERROR: Exactly one spec file expected in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-agh4tp54/watchman/. directory, 0 found

Answer: Spec file is missing for the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.KjvJPM (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.KjvJPM (%build)
Child return code was: 1

Answer: The build failed in `%build` phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [regex.c:3845:23: error: too many arguments to function ‘bcmp_translate’; expected 0, have 4
 3845 |                     ? bcmp_translate (d, d2, mcnt, translate)
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~  ~
regex.c:3003:12: note: declared here
 3003 | static int bcmp_translate ();
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Build failed due to this compile error.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the function declaration differs from the actual function call later. This kind of error may appear when the default language version for C compilation is changed from -std=gnu17 to -std=gnu23. In C17 and earlier, function declarators in form of rettype identifier (); specified no information about the number or types of the parameters while in C23 such declarations mean (void) i.e. a function taking no arguments.
Resolution: Code relying on a non-zero number of parameters can be fixed by adding the correct parameters to the function declaration. In other cases the code may be simply missing a #include of the correct header and can be fixed by including the correct header and removing the declaration. Alternatively you can use -std= to select an earlier version of the C standard.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
regex.c:3845:23: error: too many arguments to function ‘bcmp_translate’; expected 0, have 4
 3845 |                     ? bcmp_translate (d, d2, mcnt, translate)
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~  ~
regex.c:3003:12: note: declared here
 3003 | static int bcmp_translate ();
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Build failed due to this compile error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [STEP 6/12: RUN INSTALL_PKGS="nodejs nodejs-nodemon nodejs-full-i18n npm findutils tar which" &&     microdnf -y module disable nodejs &&     microdnf -y module enable nodejs:$NODEJS_VERSION &&     microdnf --nodocs --setopt=install_weak_deps=0 install $INSTALL_PKGS &&     node -v | grep -qe "^v$NODEJS_VERSION\." && echo "Found VERSION $NODEJS_VERSION" &&     microdnf clean all &&     rm -rf /mnt/rootfs/var/cache/* /mnt/rootfs/var/log/dnf* /mnt/rootfs/var/log/yum.*
Downloading metadata...
Downloading metadata...
Downloading metadata...
Downloading metadata...
error: cannot update repo 'rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried; Last error: Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel8/8/x86_64/appstream/os/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 23.13.176.251)
Error: building at STEP "RUN INSTALL_PKGS="nodejs nodejs-nodemon nodejs-full-i18n npm findutils tar which" &&     microdnf -y module disable nodejs &&     microdnf -y module enable nodejs:$NODEJS_VERSION &&     microdnf --nodocs --setopt=install_weak_deps=0 install $INSTALL_PKGS &&     node -v | grep -qe "^v$NODEJS_VERSION\." && echo "Found VERSION $NODEJS_VERSION" &&     microdnf clean all &&     rm -rf /mnt/rootfs/var/cache/* /mnt/rootfs/var/log/dnf* /mnt/rootfs/var/log/yum.*": while running runtime: exit status 1
errexit on line 33, common/build.sh
errexit on line 33, common/build.sh
errexit on line 28, common/build.sh
errexit on line 42, common/build.sh
errexit on line 61, common/build.sh
errexit on line 61, common/build.sh
make[1]: *** [common/common.mk:84: 18-minimal] Error 1]: [Downloading metadata from subscribed repo failed]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because of it was not able to download repodata. Check if system is subscribed properly and what kind of pool you used.
Resolution: Select proper pool by command subscription-manager attach --pool <proper-pool>
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
STEP 6/12: RUN INSTALL_PKGS="nodejs nodejs-nodemon nodejs-full-i18n npm findutils tar which" &&     microdnf -y module disable nodejs &&     microdnf -y module enable nodejs:$NODEJS_VERSION &&     microdnf --nodocs --setopt=install_weak_deps=0 install $INSTALL_PKGS &&     node -v | grep -qe "^v$NODEJS_VERSION\." && echo "Found VERSION $NODEJS_VERSION" &&     microdnf clean all &&     rm -rf /mnt/rootfs/var/cache/* /mnt/rootfs/var/log/dnf* /mnt/rootfs/var/log/yum.*
Downloading metadata...
Downloading metadata...
Downloading metadata...
Downloading metadata...
error: cannot update repo 'rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried; Last error: Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel8/8/x86_64/appstream/os/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 23.13.176.251)
Error: building at STEP "RUN INSTALL_PKGS="nodejs nodejs-nodemon nodejs-full-i18n npm findutils tar which" &&     microdnf -y module disable nodejs &&     microdnf -y module enable nodejs:$NODEJS_VERSION &&     microdnf --nodocs --setopt=install_weak_deps=0 install $INSTALL_PKGS &&     node -v | grep -qe "^v$NODEJS_VERSION\." && echo "Found VERSION $NODEJS_VERSION" &&     microdnf clean all &&     rm -rf /mnt/rootfs/var/cache/* /mnt/rootfs/var/log/dnf* /mnt/rootfs/var/log/yum.*": while running runtime: exit status 1
errexit on line 33, common/build.sh
errexit on line 33, common/build.sh
errexit on line 28, common/build.sh
errexit on line 42, common/build.sh
errexit on line 61, common/build.sh
errexit on line 61, common/build.sh
make[1]: *** [common/common.mk:84: 18-minimal] Error 1

Answer: Downloading metadata from subscribed repo failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ignoring return value of ‘lockf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result]
]: [The relevant error message saying that the return value of the 'lockf' function call is being ignored.]
=============
[cc1: some warnings being treated as errors]: [A compiler warning message providing further context why an error happened.]


Answer: Issue: The build scripts explicitly specified the '-Werror=unused-result' compiler flag that turns the particular warning into an error, failing the build.
Resolution: Either store and use the return value of the 'lockf' function call or remove the '-Werror=unused-result' compiler flag.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ignoring return value of ‘lockf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result]


Answer: The relevant error message saying that the return value of the 'lockf' function call is being ignored.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Answer: A compiler warning message providing further context why an error happened.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [---> 13:47:20     Starting MySQL server with disabled networking ...
---> 13:47:20     Waiting for MySQL to start ...
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] Starting MariaDB 10.11.10-MariaDB-log source revision 3d0fb150289716ca75cd64d62823cf715ee47646 server_uid 2DAP7+jSGnuV6itoSPgUbQxL1/c= as process 59
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Compressed tables use zlib 1.2.11
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Number of transaction pools: 1
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Using crc32 + pclmulqdq instructions
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] mysqld: O_TMPFILE is not supported on /var/tmp (disabling future attempts)
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Using Linux native AIO
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Initializing buffer pool, total size = 16.000MiB, chunk size = 1.000MiB
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Completed initialization of buffer pool
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Buffered log writes (block size=512 bytes)
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: End of log at LSN=46996
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: 128 rollback segments are active.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Setting file './ibtmp1' size to 12.000MiB. Physically writing the file full; Please wait ...
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: File './ibtmp1' size is now 12.000MiB.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: log sequence number 46996; transaction id 14
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] Plugin 'FEEDBACK' is disabled.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Loading buffer pool(s) from /var/lib/mysql/data/ib_buffer_pool
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Warning] 'user' entry 'root@f388376d23f7' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Warning] 'proxies_priv' entry '@% root@f388376d23f7' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Buffer pool(s) load completed at 250414 13:47:20
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] /usr/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections.
Version: '10.11.10-MariaDB-log'  socket: '/tmp/mysql.sock'  port: 0  MariaDB Server
---> 13:47:21     MySQL started successfully
/usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/common.sh: line 107: mysql_upgrade: command not found
Test for image 'quay.io/sclorg/mariadb-1011-c9s:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Error: can only create exec sessions on running containers: container state improper
Error: can only create exec sessions on running containers: container state improper
]: [During the rpm package installation in container, someone removed package that provides 'mysql_upgrade' tool.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the mandatory tool 'mysql_upgrade' is missing.
Resolution: The fix is to install rpm package that contains 'mysql_upgrade' command. Use `dnf whatprovides mysql_upgrade` command
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
---> 13:47:20     Starting MySQL server with disabled networking ...
---> 13:47:20     Waiting for MySQL to start ...
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] Starting MariaDB 10.11.10-MariaDB-log source revision 3d0fb150289716ca75cd64d62823cf715ee47646 server_uid 2DAP7+jSGnuV6itoSPgUbQxL1/c= as process 59
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Compressed tables use zlib 1.2.11
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Number of transaction pools: 1
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Using crc32 + pclmulqdq instructions
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] mysqld: O_TMPFILE is not supported on /var/tmp (disabling future attempts)
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Using Linux native AIO
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Initializing buffer pool, total size = 16.000MiB, chunk size = 1.000MiB
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Completed initialization of buffer pool
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Buffered log writes (block size=512 bytes)
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: End of log at LSN=46996
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: 128 rollback segments are active.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Setting file './ibtmp1' size to 12.000MiB. Physically writing the file full; Please wait ...
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: File './ibtmp1' size is now 12.000MiB.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: log sequence number 46996; transaction id 14
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] Plugin 'FEEDBACK' is disabled.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Loading buffer pool(s) from /var/lib/mysql/data/ib_buffer_pool
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Warning] 'user' entry 'root@f388376d23f7' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Warning] 'proxies_priv' entry '@% root@f388376d23f7' ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode.
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] InnoDB: Buffer pool(s) load completed at 250414 13:47:20
2025-04-14 13:47:20 0 [Note] /usr/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections.
Version: '10.11.10-MariaDB-log'  socket: '/tmp/mysql.sock'  port: 0  MariaDB Server
---> 13:47:21     MySQL started successfully
/usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/common.sh: line 107: mysql_upgrade: command not found
Test for image 'quay.io/sclorg/mariadb-1011-c9s:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Error: can only create exec sessions on running containers: container state improper
Error: can only create exec sessions on running containers: container state improper


Answer: During the rpm package installation in container, someone removed package that provides 'mysql_upgrade' tool.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
AttributeError: module 'importlib.resources' has no attribute 'content]: [It contains the exact Python error which has occurred with the package build.]


Answer: Issue: Many importlib.resources methods have been removed from Python 3.13. importlib.resources.contents() is one of them.
Resolution: The upstream code has to be ported to the supported importlib.resources.files() API.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

AttributeError: module 'importlib.resources' has no attribute 'content

Answer: It contains the exact Python error which has occurred with the package build.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
vendor/github.com/containers/storage/drivers/btrfs/btrfs.go:12:10: fatal error: btrfs/ioctl.h: No such file or directo]: [An error from gcc that clearly states why the compilation failed.
]


Answer: Issue: GCC cannot find a header file `btrfs/ioctl.h` which is needed in `storage/drivers/btrfs/btrfs.go`.
Resolution: Install package 'btrfs-progs-devel' that contains the header file ' btrfs/ioctl.h'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

vendor/github.com/containers/storage/drivers/btrfs/btrfs.go:12:10: fatal error: btrfs/ioctl.h: No such file or directo

Answer: An error from gcc that clearly states why the compilation failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/axmail-2.9-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/*
]: [The relevant error message saying that there are no files installed under the /usr/bin but mentioned in the %files section.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to Fedora /bin /sbin merge, because the source package is hard coding /usr/sbin path
Resolution: Patch the source package Makefile not tho hardcode /usr/sbin, but obey BINDIR variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/axmail-2.9-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/*


Answer: The relevant error message saying that there are no files installed under the /usr/bin but mentioned in the %files section.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in deploy/helm/flightctl/templates/flightctl-api-config.yaml
Auto-merging deploy/helm/flightctl/templates/flightctl-api-deployment.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in deploy/helm/flightctl/templates/flightctl-api-deployment.yaml
Auto-merging deploy/helm/flightctl/values.yaml
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.']: [During the merge process, conflicts were encountered in two files:
flightctl-api-config.yaml
flightctl-api-deployment.yaml
These conflicts happen when changes were made to the same lines in both the pull request and the current branch. Git cannot automatically decide which version to keep, so it requires manual intervention.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because Packit is not able to merge pull request #681 into main.
Resolution: Fix Conflicts: Open the mentioned files (flightctl-api-config.yaml and flightctl-api-deployment.yaml) in a text editor. You'll see markers indicating the conflicting lines. You need to manually decide which version (from the pull request or the current branch) to keep for each conflict and adjust the file content accordingly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in deploy/helm/flightctl/templates/flightctl-api-config.yaml
Auto-merging deploy/helm/flightctl/templates/flightctl-api-deployment.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in deploy/helm/flightctl/templates/flightctl-api-deployment.yaml
Auto-merging deploy/helm/flightctl/values.yaml
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.'

Answer: During the merge process, conflicts were encountered in two files:
flightctl-api-config.yaml
flightctl-api-deployment.yaml
These conflicts happen when changes were made to the same lines in both the pull request and the current branch. Git cannot automatically decide which version to keep, so it requires manual intervention.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(luajit)
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages]: [The pkgconfig(luajit) package was not found by dnf.]


Answer: Issue: The pkgconfig(luajit) package was not found by dnf. Either it is misnamed in the BuildRequires, named differently in the dnf repositories or not supported on this achitecture.
Resolution: Ensure the BuildRequires of pkgconfig(luajit) is spelled correctly, is available on the dnf repos and is available on the architecture you are building for.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(luajit)
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages

Answer: The pkgconfig(luajit) package was not found by dnf.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: python3dist(cmocean)]: [The build dependency is missing. There is no package that provides python3dist(cmocean).]
=============
[No match for argument: python3dist(sphinx-book-theme)]: [The build dependency is missing. There is no package that provides python3dist(sphinx-book-theme).]
=============
[Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(decorator) needed by python3-autodoc-0.5.0-1.fc36.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(webtest) needed by python3-autodoc-0.5.0-1.fc36.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.10 needed by python3-autodoc-0.5.0-1.fc36.noarch from copr_base
 Problem 2: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-sphinx-autodoc-typehints-1.25.2-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(sphinx) >= 7.1.2 needed by python3-sphinx-autodoc-typehints-1.25.2-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
 Problem 3: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-xarray-2023.11.0-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(numpy) >= 1.22 needed by python3-xarray-2023.11.0-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(pandas) >= 1.4 needed by python3-xarray-2023.11.0-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(packaging) >= 21.3 needed by python3-xarray-2023.11.0-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
]: [There are conflicting packages. It seems that some packages requires python 3.10 while other requires python3.12.]


Answer: Issue: The build dependency could not be satisfied.
Resolution: You have to build the missing dependency first and then rebuild the conflicting packages so they will use newer python. Then you can safely rebuild your package and it should proceed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(cmocean)

Answer: The build dependency is missing. There is no package that provides python3dist(cmocean).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(sphinx-book-theme)

Answer: The build dependency is missing. There is no package that provides python3dist(sphinx-book-theme).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(decorator) needed by python3-autodoc-0.5.0-1.fc36.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(webtest) needed by python3-autodoc-0.5.0-1.fc36.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.10 needed by python3-autodoc-0.5.0-1.fc36.noarch from copr_base
 Problem 2: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-sphinx-autodoc-typehints-1.25.2-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(sphinx) >= 7.1.2 needed by python3-sphinx-autodoc-typehints-1.25.2-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
 Problem 3: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-xarray-2023.11.0-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(numpy) >= 1.22 needed by python3-xarray-2023.11.0-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(pandas) >= 1.4 needed by python3-xarray-2023.11.0-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(packaging) >= 21.3 needed by python3-xarray-2023.11.0-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base


Answer: There are conflicting packages. It seems that some packages requires python 3.10 while other requires python3.12.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-nanobind-2.7.0-build/BUILDROOT/not/existing/path]: [This indicates that a file listed in the %files section could not be found.]


Answer: Issue: The %files section lists a file that doesn't exist in the buildroot.
Resolution: Only list files in %files sections that do exist. Remove /not/existing/path from %files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-nanobind-2.7.0-build/BUILDROOT/not/existing/path

Answer: This indicates that a file listed in the %files section could not be found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [stdout: Could not parse spec file with error: can't parse specfile
stderr: error: line 1: Unknown tag: ?# Cross-distribution SLiM RPM spec.]: [This is the standard output and standard error for the rpkg command that was used to build the package.]
=============
[Copr build error: error: line 1: Unknown tag: ?# Cross-distribution SLiM RPM spec.]: [It is the Copr build error summary.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the rpkg command failed, due to being unable to parse the specfile.
Resolution: Correct the "Unknown tag", which was actually a comment at the beginning of the RPM specfile.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
stdout: Could not parse spec file with error: can't parse specfile
stderr: error: line 1: Unknown tag: ?# Cross-distribution SLiM RPM spec.

Answer: This is the standard output and standard error for the rpkg command that was used to build the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Copr build error: error: line 1: Unknown tag: ?# Cross-distribution SLiM RPM spec.

Answer: It is the Copr build error summary.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Possible precedence problem between ! and string ne at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.93-build/POE-Component-IRC-6.93/blib/lib/POE/Component/IRC.pm line 218.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/base.pm line 137.
	...propagated at /usr/share/perl5/base.pm line 159.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.93-build/POE-Component-IRC-6.93/blib/lib/POE/Component/IRC/State.pm line 9.
Compilation failed in require at t/04_plugins/14_logger/03_private.t line 8.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/04_plugins/14_logger/03_private.t line 8.
t/04_plugins/14_logger/03_private.t ................ 
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
No subtests run ]: [Here build failed, because there is warning "Possible precedence problem between ! and string ne"]


Answer: Issue: It failed because of changes in new Perl 5.42.0. 
In module  lib/POE/Component/IRC.pm, it is code on line 218
if (!ref $self->{webirc} ne 'HASH') {
which now raised the warning
Resolution: There is more way how to fixed it, describe on page 
https://metacpan.org/release/ETHER/perl-5.41.12/view/pod/perl5414delta.pod#New-Warnings

I used this replacement 
-        if (!ref $self->{webirc} ne 'HASH') {
+        if (!(ref $self->{webirc} ne 'HASH')) {

and it fixed the failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Possible precedence problem between ! and string ne at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.93-build/POE-Component-IRC-6.93/blib/lib/POE/Component/IRC.pm line 218.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/base.pm line 137.
	...propagated at /usr/share/perl5/base.pm line 159.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.93-build/POE-Component-IRC-6.93/blib/lib/POE/Component/IRC/State.pm line 9.
Compilation failed in require at t/04_plugins/14_logger/03_private.t line 8.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/04_plugins/14_logger/03_private.t line 8.
t/04_plugins/14_logger/03_private.t ................ 
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
No subtests run 

Answer: Here build failed, because there is warning "Possible precedence problem between ! and string ne"
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Ran 73 tests in 13.327s
FAILED (errors=1, skipped=5)]: [It is a reason why build failed.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Vd92jf (%check)]: [It points out that the error happened in a %check section of a spec file.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed because tests in %check section failed.
Resolution: Fix the tests so checks in %check secion can pass and build can continue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Ran 73 tests in 13.327s
FAILED (errors=1, skipped=5)

Answer: It is a reason why build failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Vd92jf (%check)

Answer: It points out that the error happened in a %check section of a spec file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Run-time dependency libclc found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
meson.build:833:12: ERROR: Dependency "libclc" not found, tried pkgconfig]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: Missing build dependency on "libclc".
Resolution: Add `BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(libclc)` to the SPEC file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Run-time dependency libclc found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
meson.build:833:12: ERROR: Dependency "libclc" not found, tried pkgconfig

Answer: Error message