fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-sender
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-receiver


Answer: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-sender and File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/udp-receiver: These lines tell you the specific files that are missing. The path /builddir/build/BUILD/udpcast-20211207-build/BUILDROOT is crucial. This is the root directory where the package will be "installed" during the build process. It's a temporary staging area. The RPM build process expects to find the udp-sender and udp-receiver executables within this staging area, specifically in the usr/bin subdirectory.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/wcurl
   /usr/share/man/man1/wcurl.1.gz
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/wcurl
   /usr/share/man/man1/wcurl.1.gz]: [Build contains files that are not packaged.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed since the build contains files that are not packaged into rpm
Resolution: Check the files and package them accordingly or remove them if unnecessary.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/wcurl
   /usr/share/man/man1/wcurl.1.gz
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/wcurl
   /usr/share/man/man1/wcurl.1.gz

Answer: Build contains files that are not packaged.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [staging/automops.c:74:19: error: conflicting types for ‘automops_alloc_protocol’; have ‘struct automops *(struct automops *)’
   74 | struct automops * automops_alloc_protocol(struct automops *cur)
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from staging/automops.c:20:]: [Description of compilation error]


Answer: Issue: There are multiple different definitions of the same structure
Resolution: Rename one definition or delete it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
staging/automops.c:74:19: error: conflicting types for ‘automops_alloc_protocol’; have ‘struct automops *(struct automops *)’
   74 | struct automops * automops_alloc_protocol(struct automops *cur)
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from staging/automops.c:20:

Answer: Description of compilation error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [INFO: Running in chroot: ['su - mockbuild -c \'set -xe ; cd /workdir ; COPR_OWNER=mksanthi COPR_PROJECT=noumenia COPR_PACKAGE=\'"\'"\'\'"\'"\' COPR_RESULTDIR=/workdir /script\'']
Start: chroot ['su - mockbuild -c \'set -xe ; cd /workdir ; COPR_OWNER=mksanthi COPR_PROJECT=noumenia COPR_PACKAGE=\'"\'"\'\'"\'"\' COPR_RESULTDIR=/workdir /script\'']
su: Permission denied
Finish: chroot ['su - mockbuild -c \'set -xe ; cd /workdir ; COPR_OWNER=mksanthi COPR_PROJECT=noumenia COPR_PACKAGE=\'"\'"\'\'"\'"\' COPR_RESULTDIR=/workdir /script\'']
Finish: run
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 115, in <module>
    run_cmd(mock + ['--chroot', 'su - {0} -c {1}'.format(user, cmd)])
    ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd
    return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['mock', '-r', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/mock-config.cfg', '--chroot', 'su - mockbuild -c \'set -xe ; cd /workdir ; COPR_OWNER=mksanthi COPR_PROJECT=noumenia COPR_PACKAGE=\'"\'"\'\'"\'"\' COPR_RESULTDIR=/workdir /script\'']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
Copr build error: Build failed
]: [Error message!]


Answer: Issue: I have no idea, it always worked fine before.
Resolution: No idea :)
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
INFO: Running in chroot: ['su - mockbuild -c \'set -xe ; cd /workdir ; COPR_OWNER=mksanthi COPR_PROJECT=noumenia COPR_PACKAGE=\'"\'"\'\'"\'"\' COPR_RESULTDIR=/workdir /script\'']
Start: chroot ['su - mockbuild -c \'set -xe ; cd /workdir ; COPR_OWNER=mksanthi COPR_PROJECT=noumenia COPR_PACKAGE=\'"\'"\'\'"\'"\' COPR_RESULTDIR=/workdir /script\'']
su: Permission denied
Finish: chroot ['su - mockbuild -c \'set -xe ; cd /workdir ; COPR_OWNER=mksanthi COPR_PROJECT=noumenia COPR_PACKAGE=\'"\'"\'\'"\'"\' COPR_RESULTDIR=/workdir /script\'']
Finish: run
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 115, in <module>
    run_cmd(mock + ['--chroot', 'su - {0} -c {1}'.format(user, cmd)])
    ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd
    return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['mock', '-r', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/mock-config.cfg', '--chroot', 'su - mockbuild -c \'set -xe ; cd /workdir ; COPR_OWNER=mksanthi COPR_PROJECT=noumenia COPR_PACKAGE=\'"\'"\'\'"\'"\' COPR_RESULTDIR=/workdir /script\'']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
Copr build error: Build failed


Answer: Error message!
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'mongo-c-driver-devel']: [Package 'mongo-c-driver-devel' cannot be installed because it's not available in enabled RPM repositories.]


Answer: Issue: One of the required build dependencies, 'mongo-c-driver-devel', cannot be installed so the build cannot proceed.
Resolution: If the dependency is required, you need to provide it to proceed with the build process. If it's not required, remove it from BuildRequires and update the %build section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'mongo-c-driver-devel'

Answer: Package 'mongo-c-driver-devel' cannot be installed because it's not available in enabled RPM repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [meson.build:2860:0: ERROR: Program 'run-clang-tidy' not found or not executable]: [Meson didn't find a build dependency run-clang-tidy]


Answer: Issue: Missing build dependency run-clang-tidy failed the build
Resolution: Add build dependency on run-clang-tidy
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meson.build:2860:0: ERROR: Program 'run-clang-tidy' not found or not executable

Answer: Meson didn't find a build dependency run-clang-tidy
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [PHPUnit 9.6.23 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Runtime:       PHP 8.4.7
]: [Test suite uses PHPUnit 9 with PHP 8.4]
=============
[1) InputTest::testInputFile with data set #3 ('/builddir/build/BUILD/php-mar...s.less')
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
   lighten1: #ffffff;\n
   lighten2: #7c8df2;\n
   lighten3: rgba(222,140,129,0.5);\n
-  darken1: #d6d6d6;\n
+  darken1: #d5d5d5;\n
   darken2: #0d1e81;\n
   darken3: rgba(18,42,185,0.5);\n
   saturate1: #f1eded;\n]: [Failing test with diff between expected and actual output]


Answer: Issue: PHP 8.4 introduces changes in the round function.
Resolution: Test unit need to be adapted to new PHP 8.4
or code adapted to new rounding method.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
PHPUnit 9.6.23 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Runtime:       PHP 8.4.7


Answer: Test suite uses PHPUnit 9 with PHP 8.4
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1) InputTest::testInputFile with data set #3 ('/builddir/build/BUILD/php-mar...s.less')
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
   lighten1: #ffffff;\n
   lighten2: #7c8df2;\n
   lighten3: rgba(222,140,129,0.5);\n
-  darken1: #d6d6d6;\n
+  darken1: #d5d5d5;\n
   darken2: #0d1e81;\n
   darken3: rgba(18,42,185,0.5);\n
   saturate1: #f1eded;\n

Answer: Failing test with diff between expected and actual output
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:556:  Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M', 'e6787cae1a9f4c44a56fa85f07305c8a', '-D', '/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64-bootstrap/root', '-a', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', '--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.5odq4ki7:/etc/resolv.conf', '--console=pipe', '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root/installation-homedir', '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', '--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', '/usr/bin/dnf-3', 'builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root/', '--releasever', '10', '--setopt=deltarpm=False', '--setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes', '--allowerasing', '--disableplugin=local', '--disableplugin=spacewalk', '--disableplugin=versionlock', '/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/python-httpcore-1.0.7-1.el10_0.src.rpm', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root/installation-homedir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False]: [Here is where the build starts trying to install the build requirements.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:459:  No matching package to install: 'python3-pytest-httpbin']: [This shows that the build requirement of python3-pytest-httpbin could not be found.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:459:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:459:  Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [The build stops here because not all build requirements could be installed.]


Answer: Issue: This package has a build requirement on python3-pytest-httpbin, but it is not available in any of the enabled repos.
Resolution: Ensure that the package name for the build requirement is correct in the spec file, and that all necessary repos are enabled for the build.  If those are OK, then fixing the build may require adding additional packages to those repos (such as EPEL in this case).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:556:  Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M', 'e6787cae1a9f4c44a56fa85f07305c8a', '-D', '/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64-bootstrap/root', '-a', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', '--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.5odq4ki7:/etc/resolv.conf', '--console=pipe', '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', '--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root/installation-homedir', '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', '--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', '/usr/bin/dnf-3', 'builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root/', '--releasever', '10', '--setopt=deltarpm=False', '--setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes', '--allowerasing', '--disableplugin=local', '--disableplugin=spacewalk', '--disableplugin=versionlock', '/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/python-httpcore-1.0.7-1.el10_0.src.rpm', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/var/lib/mock/centos-stream+epel-10-x86_64/root/installation-homedir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False

Answer: Here is where the build starts trying to install the build requirements.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  No matching package to install: 'python3-pytest-httpbin'

Answer: This shows that the build requirement of python3-pytest-httpbin could not be found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:459:  Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: The build stops here because not all build requirements could be installed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.0 (running go 1.22.9; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)
]: [error from the go build]


Answer: Issue: package requires newer version of the Go than is available
Resolution: include the version requirement in the specfile **and** package the appropriate version of Go toolchain that satisfies the requirement
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.0 (running go 1.22.9; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)


Answer: error from the go build
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [HTML-Proofer found 2 failures!]: [It shows HTML-proofer ended with 2 errors.]
=============
[- ./_site/explainery/elektrifikace-dopravy.html

  *  Build error (line 370)

     No item with slug 57-doprava-ve-meste]: [It shows there was an error while building file "./_site/explainery/elektrifikace-dopravy.html" on line 370.]
=============
[- ./_site/temata/energetika.html

  *  Build error (line 778)

     No item with slug 57-doprava-ve-meste]: [It shows there was an error while building file "./_site/temata/energetika.html" on line 778.]


Answer: Issue: There were two HTML-proofer errors: Files "./_site/explainery/elektrifikace-dopravy.html" and "./_site/temata/energetika.html" are referencing the item with slug "57-doprava-ve-meste". However, no such item exists.
Resolution: Either add an item with the slug "57-doprava-ve-meste" or adjust the slug referenced from files "./_site/explainery/elektrifikace-dopravy.html" (line 370) and "./_site/temata/energetika.html" (line 778) to an existing one.
Check for typos in the slug ID.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
HTML-Proofer found 2 failures!

Answer: It shows HTML-proofer ended with 2 errors.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
- ./_site/explainery/elektrifikace-dopravy.html

  *  Build error (line 370)

     No item with slug 57-doprava-ve-meste

Answer: It shows there was an error while building file "./_site/explainery/elektrifikace-dopravy.html" on line 370.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
- ./_site/temata/energetika.html

  *  Build error (line 778)

     No item with slug 57-doprava-ve-meste

Answer: It shows there was an error while building file "./_site/temata/energetika.html" on line 778.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearc]: [Package clang-rpm-macros requires package clang in version 13.0.0]


Answer: Issue: Your dependency clang-rpm-macros requires a package in a version that is not presented in the repository.
Resolution: You should contact the maintainer of the clang-rpm-macro package and inform them about the problem and missing dependency. The fix can be either that the maintainer of the clang-rpm-macros package amends the required version (usually bumping up the version or allowing higher versions) or that the package clang has to be rebased to a newer version. Another option is that package clang-rpm-macros is old (and clang has been rebased) and needs to be rebased to match clang's newer version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearc

Answer: Package clang-rpm-macros requires package clang in version 13.0.0
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./h  -I h -I /usr/include/tirpc   -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=z13 -mtune=z14 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fsigned-char -pipe -fcommon -fno-builtin-malloc -fno-builtin-free -fno-PIE -fno-pie -fno-PIC -fno-pic -std=gnu17 -Wall -Wno-empty-body -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64  -I/usr/include/tirpc   -O2 -I o  -c -o o/main.o o/main.c
In file included from ./h/include.h:39,
                 from o/main.c:46:
o/main.c: In function ‘fSdisassemble_instruction’:
o/main.c:1475:14: error: ‘bfd_mach_64_bit’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘bfd_mach_x64_32’?
 1475 |       i.mach=OUTPUT_MACH;
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~
o/main.c:1475:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1830: o/main.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/gcl-2.7.1-build/gcl-2.7.1'
make: *** [Makefile:1044: all] Error 2
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zcV2dz (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zcV2dz (%build)]: [gcc complains about an undeclared identifier.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because gcc encountered an undeclared identifier
Resolution: Check if the identifier is spelled correctly, or include the necessary header.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./h  -I h -I /usr/include/tirpc   -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=z13 -mtune=z14 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fsigned-char -pipe -fcommon -fno-builtin-malloc -fno-builtin-free -fno-PIE -fno-pie -fno-PIC -fno-pic -std=gnu17 -Wall -Wno-empty-body -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64  -I/usr/include/tirpc   -O2 -I o  -c -o o/main.o o/main.c
In file included from ./h/include.h:39,
                 from o/main.c:46:
o/main.c: In function ‘fSdisassemble_instruction’:
o/main.c:1475:14: error: ‘bfd_mach_64_bit’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘bfd_mach_x64_32’?
 1475 |       i.mach=OUTPUT_MACH;
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~
o/main.c:1475:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1830: o/main.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/gcl-2.7.1-build/gcl-2.7.1'
make: *** [Makefile:1044: all] Error 2
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zcV2dz (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zcV2dz (%build)

Answer: gcc complains about an undeclared identifier.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
libtool: compile:  /builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.1.1-build/gcc-15.1.1-20250425/obj-aarch64-redhat-linux/aarch64-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -B/usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/bin/ -B/usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/include -isystem /usr/aarch64-redhat-linux/sys-include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_DEBUG -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -DHAVE_RPC_XDR_H=0 -DHAVE_TIRPC_RPC_XDR_H=0 -DHAVE_AS_SYM_ASSIGN=1 -I. -I../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common -I.. -I ../../../../libsanitizer/include -I ../../../../libsanitizer -isystem ../../../../libsanitizer/include/system -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -fPIC -fno-builtin -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fomit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fvisibility=hidden -Wno-variadic-macros -I../../libstdc++-v3/include -I../../libstdc++-v3/include/aarch64-redhat-linux -I../../../../libsanitizer/../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -std=gnu++17 -DSANITIZER_LIBBACKTRACE -DSANITIZER_CP_DEMANGLE -I ../../../../libsanitizer/../libbacktrace -I ../libbacktrace -I ../../../../libsanitizer/../include -include ../../../../libsanitizer/libbacktrace/backtrace-rename.h -O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -mbranch-protection=standard -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT sanitizer_termination.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/sanitizer_termination.Tpo -c ../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp -o sanitizer_termination.o >/dev/null 2>&1
../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp:489:31: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘__sanitizer::termio’
  489 |   unsigned struct_termio_sz = sizeof(struct termio);
      |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: The compilation fails due an undefined structure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
+ %generate_buildrequires
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hdU7SS: line 53: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hdU7SS (%pre]: [The error message is very cryptic but `fg: no job control` usually means that an RPM macro is not defined.]


Answer: Issue: The `%generate_buildrequires` is not available on EPEL8. It was introduced in Fedora 31 and therefore will be available only in EPEL9 and higher. 

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
Resolution: Stop using dynamic `BuildRequires` for EPEL8 and lower. Instead, define all `BuildRequires` manually.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

+ %generate_buildrequires
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hdU7SS: line 53: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hdU7SS (%pre

Answer: The error message is very cryptic but `fg: no job control` usually means that an RPM macro is not defined.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAILED tests/unit/activation/test_csh.py::test_csh[no_prompt] - UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x92 in position 99: invalid start byte
FAILED tests/unit/activation/test_csh.py::test_csh[with_prompt] - UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x92 in position 99: invalid start byte
========== 2 failed, 244 passed, 26 skipped, 59 deselected in 17.50s ===========
]: [Cause: Python's utf-8 decoder encountered a byte (0x92) at position 99 in a file that it couldn't interpret as a valid UTF-8 character.]


Answer: Issue: This error message indicates a problem with character encoding during your RPM build process caused by 2 failed unit tests.
Resolution: Incorrect File Encoding: The file causing the error might be encoded in a format other than UTF-8. Here are some ways to address this:

Identify the encoding: Try tools like file or chardet to detect the actual encoding.
Specify encoding when opening the file: In your test script, open the file with the correct encoding using with open("file.txt", encoding="encoding_name") as f:.
Fix the source: If you have control over the file's origin, try re-saving it with UTF-8 encoding.
Corrupted File: The file itself might be corrupted. Try obtaining a fresh copy or re-generating the file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED tests/unit/activation/test_csh.py::test_csh[no_prompt] - UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x92 in position 99: invalid start byte
FAILED tests/unit/activation/test_csh.py::test_csh[with_prompt] - UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x92 in position 99: invalid start byte
========== 2 failed, 244 passed, 26 skipped, 59 deselected in 17.50s ===========


Answer: Cause: Python's utf-8 decoder encountered a byte (0x92) at position 99 in a file that it couldn't interpret as a valid UTF-8 character.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [2025-06-22 07:24:02.810 ERROR [kea-dhcp4.dhcp4/14755.139725778389760] DHCP4_CONFIG_LOAD_FAIL configuration error using file: /etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf, reason: Error during command processing: invalid path in `output`: invalid path specified: '/var/log', supported path is '/var/log/kea' (/etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf:58:13)
2025-06-22 07:24:02.810 ERROR [kea-dhcp4.dhcp4/14755.139725778389760] DHCP4_INIT_FAIL failed to initialize Kea server: configuration error using file '/etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf': Error during command processing: invalid path in `output`: invalid path specified: '/var/log', supported path is '/var/log/kea' (/etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf:58:13)]: [it shows the value for 'output' logging directive cannot be anything else than /var/log/kea]


Answer: Issue: value for output logging directive was different than built-in /var/log/kea or value of KEA_LOG_FILE_DIR environmental variable
Resolution: set KEA_LOG_FILE_DIR environmental variable to override the default buil-in value of /var/log/kea
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
2025-06-22 07:24:02.810 ERROR [kea-dhcp4.dhcp4/14755.139725778389760] DHCP4_CONFIG_LOAD_FAIL configuration error using file: /etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf, reason: Error during command processing: invalid path in `output`: invalid path specified: '/var/log', supported path is '/var/log/kea' (/etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf:58:13)
2025-06-22 07:24:02.810 ERROR [kea-dhcp4.dhcp4/14755.139725778389760] DHCP4_INIT_FAIL failed to initialize Kea server: configuration error using file '/etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf': Error during command processing: invalid path in `output`: invalid path specified: '/var/log', supported path is '/var/log/kea' (/etc/kea/kea-dhcp4.conf:58:13)

Answer: it shows the value for 'output' logging directive cannot be anything else than /var/log/kea
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [WARNING: The found license expression 'DolphinDB' is not a valid SPDX expression. Inspect the project manually to find the license]: [This is a warning about license format. While it is important that all packages follow certain conventions, this is not the cause of failed build.]
=============
[Fatal exception occurred: sdist not found.]: [This exception is reason for the build failure. Without sdist, the source tarball, there is nothing to build and therefore nothing to package.]
=============
[stderr: 

Unable to generate spec for `dolphindb']: [Final error, stating that there was no way to generate spec for the package.]


Answer: Issue: The source tarball, sdist, was not present during build.
Resolution: Ensure presence of sources before build commences.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
WARNING: The found license expression 'DolphinDB' is not a valid SPDX expression. Inspect the project manually to find the license

Answer: This is a warning about license format. While it is important that all packages follow certain conventions, this is not the cause of failed build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Fatal exception occurred: sdist not found.

Answer: This exception is reason for the build failure. Without sdist, the source tarball, there is nothing to build and therefore nothing to package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
stderr: 

Unable to generate spec for `dolphindb'

Answer: Final error, stating that there was no way to generate spec for the package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [#   Failed test 'An object of class 'Type::Tiny::Union' isa 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint''
#   at t/30-external/MooseX-Types/basic.t line 40.
#     The object of class 'Type::Tiny::Union' isn't a 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 24.
t/30-external/MooseX-Types/basic.t ........................... 
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/24 subtests 
t/30-external/MooseX-Types/extending.t ....................... ok
#   Failed test ''Not' isa 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint''
#   at t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t line 52.
#     'Not' isn't a 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint'
#   Failed test ''~Int' isa 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint''
#   at t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t line 52.
#     '~Int' isn't a 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint'
#   Failed test ''Int' isa 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint''
#   at t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t line 52.
#     'Int' isn't a 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint'
# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 20.
t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t ............................ 
Dubious, test returned 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
Failed 3/20 subtests ]: [t/30-external/MooseX-Types/basic.t and t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t tests of Type-Tiny-2.006000 failed their subtests related to Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint Perl class.]


Answer: Issue: MooseX-Types-0.51 moved from Sub::Name to Sub::Util module. That broke a way how Type::Tiny detected a use of Moose.
Resolution: Rebase Type-Tiny to a new 2.008002 upstream release which fixes the detection of Moose.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
#   Failed test 'An object of class 'Type::Tiny::Union' isa 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint''
#   at t/30-external/MooseX-Types/basic.t line 40.
#     The object of class 'Type::Tiny::Union' isn't a 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 24.
t/30-external/MooseX-Types/basic.t ........................... 
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/24 subtests 
t/30-external/MooseX-Types/extending.t ....................... ok
#   Failed test ''Not' isa 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint''
#   at t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t line 52.
#     'Not' isn't a 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint'
#   Failed test ''~Int' isa 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint''
#   at t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t line 52.
#     '~Int' isn't a 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint'
#   Failed test ''Int' isa 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint''
#   at t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t line 52.
#     'Int' isn't a 'Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint'
# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 20.
t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t ............................ 
Dubious, test returned 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
Failed 3/20 subtests 

Answer: t/30-external/MooseX-Types/basic.t and t/30-external/MooseX-Types/more.t tests of Type-Tiny-2.006000 failed their subtests related to Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint Perl class.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/LabPlot-2.11.80_20241117.082905.4e770ae-build/labplot-4e770ae2d988362dca637aef2b74610a4a1456c2/src/backend/datasources/filters/XLSXFilter.cpp:795:62: error: unable to deduce ‘const auto*’ from ‘QXlsx::Document::cellAt(int, int) const(row, ((int)column))’
  795 |                         const auto* cell = m_document->cellAt(row, column);
      |                                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/LabPlot-2.11.80_20241117.082905.4e770ae-build/labplot-4e770ae2d988362dca637aef2b74610a4a1456c2/src/backend/datasources/filters/XLSXFilter.cpp:795:74: note:   mismatched types ‘const auto*’ and ‘std::shared_ptr<QXlsx::Cell>’
  795 |                         const auto* cell = m_document->cellAt(row, column);
      |                                                                          ^
]: [The compiler is trying to deduce the type of the cell variable using auto, but it can't figure it out.  Specifically, it's having trouble with the return value of m_document->cellAt(row, column). The compiler is telling you that it expected the return type of m_document->cellAt() to be something that could be represented as const auto* (a const pointer to some type). However, the actual return type is std::shared_ptr<QXlsx::Cell>.  This is a smart pointer, a common way to manage object lifetimes in C++.]


Answer: Issue: This is a C++ compiler error related to type deduction with auto and the return type of the QXlsx::Document::cellAt() method.
The error message is hidden inside the log file because compilation of other objects continued in  CMake even after this failure.
Resolution: You need to use the correct type for the cell variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/LabPlot-2.11.80_20241117.082905.4e770ae-build/labplot-4e770ae2d988362dca637aef2b74610a4a1456c2/src/backend/datasources/filters/XLSXFilter.cpp:795:62: error: unable to deduce ‘const auto*’ from ‘QXlsx::Document::cellAt(int, int) const(row, ((int)column))’
  795 |                         const auto* cell = m_document->cellAt(row, column);
      |                                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/LabPlot-2.11.80_20241117.082905.4e770ae-build/labplot-4e770ae2d988362dca637aef2b74610a4a1456c2/src/backend/datasources/filters/XLSXFilter.cpp:795:74: note:   mismatched types ‘const auto*’ and ‘std::shared_ptr<QXlsx::Cell>’
  795 |                         const auto* cell = m_document->cellAt(row, column);
      |                                                                          ^


Answer: The compiler is trying to deduce the type of the cell variable using auto, but it can't figure it out.  Specifically, it's having trouble with the return value of m_document->cellAt(row, column). The compiler is telling you that it expected the return type of m_document->cellAt() to be something that could be represented as const auto* (a const pointer to some type). However, the actual return type is std::shared_ptr<QXlsx::Cell>.  This is a smart pointer, a common way to manage object lifetimes in C++.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/bin/patch: **** malformed patch at line 33: @@ -33,6 +32,10 @@ if features['wayland-protocols-1-39']]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: Provided patch file is malformed and cannot be applied.
Resolution: Provide applicable patch file, you can check that your patch file works by trying it outside of the build process by running command git apply file.patch in the git clone directory of source code.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/patch: **** malformed patch at line 33: @@ -33,6 +32,10 @@ if features['wayland-protocols-1-39']

Answer: Error message