fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/pychess-1.0.3-build/pychess-1.0.3/setup.py", line 56, in <module>
    from distutils.command.register import register
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.command.register']: [This is where the build failed]


Answer: Issue: setup.py tool which si used during the build imports module named distutils.command.register' but the module is not present in the buildroot
Resolution: Add package providing the module named 'distutils.command.register' as a BuildRequires in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/pychess-1.0.3-build/pychess-1.0.3/setup.py", line 56, in <module>
    from distutils.command.register import register
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.command.register'

Answer: This is where the build failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 198, in _run_module_as_main
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/__main__.py", line 6, in <module>
    run()
    ~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/run.py", line 20, in run
    result = main(sys.argv[1:] if args is None else args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/run.py", line 42, in main
    result = provision(state)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/provision.py", line 87, in provision
    MANAGER.tox_add_core_config(state.conf.core, state)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/plugin/manager.py", line 81, in tox_add_core_config
    self.manager.hook.tox_add_core_config(core_conf=core_conf, state=state)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_hooks.py", line 513, in __call__
    return self._hookexec(self.name, self._hookimpls.copy(), kwargs, firstresult)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_manager.py", line 120, in _hookexec
    return self._inner_hookexec(hook_name, methods, kwargs, firstresult)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 139, in _multicall
    raise exception.with_traceback(exception.__traceback__)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 103, in _multicall
    res = hook_impl.function(*args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox_current_env/hooks4.py", line 82, in tox_add_core_config
    raise LookupError(
    ...<4 lines>...
    )
LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.]: [The snippet shows LookupError for missing tox configuration.]


Answer: Issue: The specfile contains %pyproject_buildrequires -t, but there is not tox.ini file in the sources.
Resolution: -t option should be used only when tox.ini file is present. Remove it and try to run the tests differently.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[143/165] Linking target fuzz-netdev-parser
FAILED: fuzz-netdev-parser 
gcc  -o fuzz-netdev-parser fuzz-netdev-parser.p/src_network_fuzz-netdev-parser.c.o fuzz-netdev-parser.p/src_fuzz_fuzz-main.c.o -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -fstack-protector -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld-errors -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer '-Wl,-rpath,$ORIGIN/src/shared' '-Wl,-rpath-link,/builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-258_devel-build/systemd-258~devel/redhat-linux-build/src/shared' -Wl,--start-group src/shared/libsystemd-shared-258-devel.so src/libsystemd-network/libsystemd-network.a -Wl,--end-group -pthread -Wl,--fatal-warnings -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--warn-common -Wl,--gc-sections -Wl,--fatal-warnings -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--warn-common -Wl,--gc-sections


Answer: Compilation of fuzz-netdev-parser failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[144/165] Linking target fuzz-network-parser
FAILED: fuzz-network-parser 
gcc  -o fuzz-network-parser fuzz-network-parser.p/src_network_fuzz-network-parser.c.o fuzz-network-parser.p/src_fuzz_fuzz-main.c.o -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -fstack-protector -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld-errors -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer '-Wl,-rpath,$ORIGIN/src/shared' '-Wl,-rpath-link,/builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-258_devel-build/systemd-258~devel/redhat-linux-build/src/shared' -Wl,--start-group src/shared/libsystemd-shared-258-devel.so src/libsystemd-network/libsystemd-network.a -Wl,--end-group -pthread -Wl,--fatal-warnings -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--warn-common -Wl,--gc-sections -Wl,--fatal-warnings -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--warn-common -Wl,--gc-sections


Answer: Compilation of fuzz-network-parser failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_______________________________ test_style_defs ________________________________
]: [test_style_defs failed during the test run]
=============
[>           assert expect_line in style_str
E           AssertionError: assert '.o { color: #666666 } /* Operator */' in 'pre { line-height: 125%; }\ntd.linenos .normal { color: inherit; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 5px; pa...e.Instance */\n.vm { color: #19177C } /* Name.Variable.Magic */\n.il { color: #666 } /* Literal.Number.Integer.Long */'

]: [Assertion error in the test failed. The test checks if expect_line, whose value is '.o { color: #666666 } /* Operator */' is in the style_str. It isn't, hence the assertion fails.]
=============
[        # Check that a sample of the styles are present
        # (use only a sample to make the test more robust
        # against Pygments changes).]: [The test tests features related to Pygments library.]


Answer: Issue: A new version of pygments has probably changed generated output of the css files. The test looks for a specific string in the file content and doesn't find it. This causes test to fail.
Resolution: The source code of the package should be updated to incorporate changes happening in the new pygments version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_______________________________ test_style_defs ________________________________


Answer: test_style_defs failed during the test run
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
>           assert expect_line in style_str
E           AssertionError: assert '.o { color: #666666 } /* Operator */' in 'pre { line-height: 125%; }\ntd.linenos .normal { color: inherit; background-color: transparent; padding-left: 5px; pa...e.Instance */\n.vm { color: #19177C } /* Name.Variable.Magic */\n.il { color: #666 } /* Literal.Number.Integer.Long */'



Answer: Assertion error in the test failed. The test checks if expect_line, whose value is '.o { color: #666666 } /* Operator */' is in the style_str. It isn't, hence the assertion fails.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
        # Check that a sample of the styles are present
        # (use only a sample to make the test more robust
        # against Pygments changes).

Answer: The test tests features related to Pygments library.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [MariaDB Version 11.8.1-MariaDB
 - SSL connections supported
** ERROR: Could not find '' in 
 at lib/mtr_cases.pm line 361.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mTtJJz (%check)]: [This is where the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: A test in test suite is broken.
Resolution: Fix the test suite or disable it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
MariaDB Version 11.8.1-MariaDB
 - SSL connections supported
** ERROR: Could not find '' in 
 at lib/mtr_cases.pm line 361.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mTtJJz (%check)

Answer: This is where the build failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
******************** TEST 'MLIR :: Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 2
rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp || true
# executed command: rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp
# RUN: at line 3
/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/mlir-opt /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/mlir/test/Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir -mlir-print-ir-tree-dir=/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp    -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(cse,canonicalize)))'    -mlir-print-ir-before=cse
# executed command: /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/mlir-opt /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/mlir/test/Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir -mlir-print-ir-tree-dir=/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp '-pass-pipeline=builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(cse,canonicalize)))' -mlir-print-ir-before=cse
# .---command stderr------------
# | mlir-opt: for the --mlir-print-ir-before option: Cannot find option named 'cse'!
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 1

--


Answer: The test "MLIR :: Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir" ended with result: "FAILED". This shows the output that was gathered for the test execution. It might contain insights into why the test "MLIR :: Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir" had an unexpected outcome.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [../tests/check_signon.c:391:28: error: too many arguments to function ‘signon_identity_new’; expected 0, have 2
  391 |     SignonIdentity *idty = signon_identity_new(NULL, NULL);
      |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
In file included from ../libsignon-glib/signon-internals.h:39,
                 from ../tests/check_signon.c:32:]: [Description of the compilation error in tests]


Answer: Issue: function signon_identity_new was provided with 2 NULL arguments, but it expects 0
Resolution: Adjust the code according to the compiler advice.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
../tests/check_signon.c:391:28: error: too many arguments to function ‘signon_identity_new’; expected 0, have 2
  391 |     SignonIdentity *idty = signon_identity_new(NULL, NULL);
      |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
In file included from ../libsignon-glib/signon-internals.h:39,
                 from ../tests/check_signon.c:32:

Answer: Description of the compilation error in tests
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Verify the "py-list" command with two absolute arguments ... Timeout (0:45:00)!]: [It is the reason for the tests to fail. One test timed out.]
=============
[Verify the "py-list" command with two absolute arguments ... Timeout (0:45:00)!]: [The test timed out when tried for the second time.]


Answer: Issue: test_gdb failed because it timed out
Resolution: Resubmit the build again to verify if this is reproducible. Sometimes, such failures happen seemingly at random.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Verify the "py-list" command with two absolute arguments ... Timeout (0:45:00)!

Answer: It is the reason for the tests to fail. One test timed out.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Verify the "py-list" command with two absolute arguments ... Timeout (0:45:00)!

Answer: The test timed out when tried for the second time.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Copr build error: Build failed]: [Message indicating general build failure.]
=============
[No match for argument: python3dist(string-gen) >= 0.1]: [Required package `python3dist(string-gen) >= 0.1` was not retrieve by the package manager.]


Answer: Issue: One of the dependencies was not installed by the package manager.
Resolution: Verify dependencies and their versions before executing build, ensure that they are available from the installed repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(string-gen) >= 0.1

Answer: Required package `python3dist(string-gen) >= 0.1` was not retrieve by the package manager.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides filesystem(unmerged-sbin-symlinks) needed by util-linux-2.40.4-1.fc41.x86_64 from copr_base]: [Required dependency `filesystem(unmerged-sbin-symlinks)` was not available in any of the repos.]


Answer: Issue: One of the required dependencies was not available.
Resolution: Check dependency list for any typos, or unnecessary dependencies, verify that repos installed provide required dependencies before build.

If necessary package the dependency yourself, before attempting  the build again.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides filesystem(unmerged-sbin-symlinks) needed by util-linux-2.40.4-1.fc41.x86_64 from copr_base

Answer: Required dependency `filesystem(unmerged-sbin-symlinks)` was not available in any of the repos.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [# Failed test 38 in test.pl at line 133
#  test.pl line 133 is: ok(RPM2->rpm_api_version =~ /4.\d+/);]: [Test #38 failed on line 133 of test.pl file.]


Answer: Issue: The test failed because the test expected that RPM2->rpm_api_version call will return an RPM library version starting with "4." prefix, while the new 5.99.90 version of the library returns "5.99".
Resolution: The test need to be adapted to accept the new "5.99" version. E.g. the regular expression /4.\d+/ can be changed to /(?:4\.\d+|5\.99\d*|6\.\d+)/.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
# Failed test 38 in test.pl at line 133
#  test.pl line 133 is: ok(RPM2->rpm_api_version =~ /4.\d+/);

Answer: Test #38 failed on line 133 of test.pl file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [./src/lpcini.c: In function ‘create_lpc10_encoder_state’:
./src/lpcini.c:281:9: error: too many arguments to function ‘malloc’; expected 0, have 1
  281 |         malloc((unsigned) sizeof (struct lpc10_encoder_state));
      |         ^~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./src/lpcini.c:54:23: note: declared here
   54 |         extern void * malloc();
      |                       ^~~~~~]: [This compiler error makes the build fail.]
=============
[./src/lpcini.c:54:23: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘malloc’; expected ‘void *(long unsigned int)’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
   54 |         extern void * malloc();
      |                       ^~~~~~
./src/lpcini.c:48:1: note: ‘malloc’ is declared in header ‘<stdlib.h>’
   47 | #include "f2c.h"
  +++ |+#include <stdlib.h>]: [This snippet shows the header where the function is declared and states that the declaration is different.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the function declaration differs from the actual function call later.
Resolution: Either remove the function declaration and add header where the function is declared or add the correct parameters to the function declaration.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
./src/lpcini.c: In function ‘create_lpc10_encoder_state’:
./src/lpcini.c:281:9: error: too many arguments to function ‘malloc’; expected 0, have 1
  281 |         malloc((unsigned) sizeof (struct lpc10_encoder_state));
      |         ^~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./src/lpcini.c:54:23: note: declared here
   54 |         extern void * malloc();
      |                       ^~~~~~

Answer: This compiler error makes the build fail.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
./src/lpcini.c:54:23: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘malloc’; expected ‘void *(long unsigned int)’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
   54 |         extern void * malloc();
      |                       ^~~~~~
./src/lpcini.c:48:1: note: ‘malloc’ is declared in header ‘<stdlib.h>’
   47 | #include "f2c.h"
  +++ |+#include <stdlib.h>

Answer: This snippet shows the header where the function is declared and states that the declaration is different.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 04:43:00 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: 4 services should be running (Expected 0, got 1)
root
root
root
root
:: [ 04:43:00 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: no root (Assert: "0" should not equal "0")]: [it shows kea is running under root user]


Answer: Issue: it fails because kea is running under root user instead of unprivileged
Resolution: update to the latest version of kea
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 04:43:00 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: 4 services should be running (Expected 0, got 1)
root
root
root
root
:: [ 04:43:00 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: no root (Assert: "0" should not equal "0")

Answer: it shows kea is running under root user
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR  - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'click'
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 1 error during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]: [Error while starting the test suite. Python couldn't import the click module.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed at the check stage while running the test suite for the package. The test suite requires the Python package click which was not found.
Resolution: To add a missing dependency for a package, directive Requires or BuildRequires can be used. Since this dependency is only required by the test suite, BuildRequires is the right choice because it installs the dependency only on the build machine, not when the package is installed by the user. Add spec directive BuildRequires into the spec file preamble with a package name that provides the Python package click. In Fedora, this would be `BuildRequires: python-click`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR  - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'click'
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 1 error during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer: Error while starting the test suite. Python couldn't import the click module.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [build-id found in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/llvm-21.0.0~pre20250413.g39662922e15c53-5.el9.x86_64/usr/lib64/llvm21/lib/LLVMgold.so too small]: [This is the error message for why the build failed. ]


Answer: Issue: We use lld for linking LLVM when its being built with PGO. Normally we use ld.bfd as the linker. Both linkers currently use different algorithms for generating a build-id for a shared library or an executable. ld.bfd by default uses the "sha1" algorithm and lld uses "fast". This can be controlled with the --build-id=XY switch.  
Resolution: To always use the sha1 algorithm for build-id generation, one can append to the linker flags in the spec file: 

%global build_ldflags %{?build_ldflags} -Wl,--build-id=sha1
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
build-id found in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/llvm-21.0.0~pre20250413.g39662922e15c53-5.el9.x86_64/usr/lib64/llvm21/lib/LLVMgold.so too small

Answer: This is the error message for why the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'python3-dnf >= 4.19.]: [Required package python3-dnf is not available in any enabled repository.
]


Answer: Issue: Some of the required packages were not installed.

Resolution: Enable a repo with python3-dnf package or download and install the package manually.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3-dnf >= 4.19.

Answer: Required package python3-dnf is not available in any enabled repository.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Unknown rich dependency op '(setq': (while (setq filename (read-from-minibuffer "")) (when (string-match-p "\\.el\\(\\.gz\\)?$" filename) (with-temp-buffer (insert-file-contents filename) (setq parsers nil) (while (search-forward-regexp "(treesit-\\(parser-create\\|ready-p\\) '" nil t) (add-to-list 'parsers (thing-at-point 'symbol t))) (when parsers (princ (concat ";" filename "\n")) (dolist (parser parsers) (princ (concat "tree-sitter(" parser ")" "\n")))))))
error: Unknown rich dependency op 'nil': (condition-case nil (while (setq filename (read-from-minibuffer "")) (when (string-match-p "\\.el\\(\\.gz\\)?$" filename) (with-temp-buffer (insert-file-contents filename) (setq parsers nil) (while (search-forward-regexp "(treesit-\\(parser-create\\|ready-p\\) '" nil t) (add-to-list 'parsers (thing-at-point 'symbol t))) (when parsers (princ (concat ";" filename "\n")) (dolist (parser parsers) (princ (concat "tree-sitter(" parser ")" "\n"))))))) (end-of-file nil))
error: Unknown rich dependency op '(setq': (while (setq filename (read-from-minibuffer "")) (when (string-match-p "\\.el\\(\\.gz\\)?$" filename) (with-temp-buffer (insert-file-contents filename) (setq parsers nil) (while (search-forward-regexp "(treesit-\\(parser-create\\|ready-p\\) '" nil t) (add-to-list 'parsers (thing-at-point 'symbol t))) (when parsers (princ (concat ";" filename "\n")) (dolist (parser parsers) (princ (concat "tree-sitter(" parser ")" "\n"))))))) (end-of-file nil)) t)
error: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': #<subr F616e6f6e796d6f75732d6c616d626461_anonymous_lambda_102>(#<buffer  *load*> "/usr/lib/rpm/emacs_lisp.rec")
error: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': "/usr/lib/rpm/emacs_lisp.rec" nil t #<subr F616e6f6e796d6f75732d6c616d626461_anonymous_lambda_102>)
error: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': "/usr/lib/rpm/emacs_lisp.rec"))
]: [Build fails during dependency generating step when writing the resulting binary rpms.]


Answer: Issue: Script generating the dependency information for the resulting binary rpms produces out that is not considered valid by the rpm tool.
Resolution: The dependency generating script needs to be fixed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Unknown rich dependency op '(setq': (while (setq filename (read-from-minibuffer "")) (when (string-match-p "\\.el\\(\\.gz\\)?$" filename) (with-temp-buffer (insert-file-contents filename) (setq parsers nil) (while (search-forward-regexp "(treesit-\\(parser-create\\|ready-p\\) '" nil t) (add-to-list 'parsers (thing-at-point 'symbol t))) (when parsers (princ (concat ";" filename "\n")) (dolist (parser parsers) (princ (concat "tree-sitter(" parser ")" "\n")))))))
error: Unknown rich dependency op 'nil': (condition-case nil (while (setq filename (read-from-minibuffer "")) (when (string-match-p "\\.el\\(\\.gz\\)?$" filename) (with-temp-buffer (insert-file-contents filename) (setq parsers nil) (while (search-forward-regexp "(treesit-\\(parser-create\\|ready-p\\) '" nil t) (add-to-list 'parsers (thing-at-point 'symbol t))) (when parsers (princ (concat ";" filename "\n")) (dolist (parser parsers) (princ (concat "tree-sitter(" parser ")" "\n"))))))) (end-of-file nil))
error: Unknown rich dependency op '(setq': (while (setq filename (read-from-minibuffer "")) (when (string-match-p "\\.el\\(\\.gz\\)?$" filename) (with-temp-buffer (insert-file-contents filename) (setq parsers nil) (while (search-forward-regexp "(treesit-\\(parser-create\\|ready-p\\) '" nil t) (add-to-list 'parsers (thing-at-point 'symbol t))) (when parsers (princ (concat ";" filename "\n")) (dolist (parser parsers) (princ (concat "tree-sitter(" parser ")" "\n"))))))) (end-of-file nil)) t)
error: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': #<subr F616e6f6e796d6f75732d6c616d626461_anonymous_lambda_102>(#<buffer  *load*> "/usr/lib/rpm/emacs_lisp.rec")
error: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': "/usr/lib/rpm/emacs_lisp.rec" nil t #<subr F616e6f6e796d6f75732d6c616d626461_anonymous_lambda_102>)
error: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': "/usr/lib/rpm/emacs_lisp.rec"))


Answer: Build fails during dependency generating step when writing the resulting binary rpms.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CMCiRx]: [The rpmbuild actually started, meaning that all the BuildRequires are installed.]
=============
[99% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 692]: [Cmake testsuite claims that 2 tests failed out of 692.]


Answer: Issue: The package testsuite failed.
Resolution: Check the failed test-cases, and fix them.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CMCiRx

Answer: The rpmbuild actually started, meaning that all the BuildRequires are installed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
99% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 692

Answer: Cmake testsuite claims that 2 tests failed out of 692.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RuntimeError: There is no current event loop in thread 'MainThread'.]: [Multiple tests fail with this RuntimeError about there not being a current event loop.]


Answer: Issue: Python 3.14 removed the implicit creation of an event loop by asyncio.get_event_loop.

https://docs.python.org/3.14/whatsnew/3.14.html#id7
Resolution: Patch the software to create the event loop manually with asyncio.new_event_loop, and set it as the current loop with asyncio.set_event_loop.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RuntimeError: There is no current event loop in thread 'MainThread'.

Answer: Multiple tests fail with this RuntimeError about there not being a current event loop.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:461:  2024-03-14 10:02:14,937: Non interactive installation failed: Some packages, groups or modules are missing.
DEBUG util.py:461:  2024-03-14 10:02:14,938:
DEBUG util.py:461:  2024-03-14 10:02:14,938: Problems in request:
DEBUG util.py:461:  2024-03-14 10:02:14,938: missing packages: mrpt-devel. ]: [The error message is descriptive]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because it expected a user input for installation of missing package
Resolution: Fix the kickstart file to update the missing item to be installed without user interaction.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  2024-03-14 10:02:14,937: Non interactive installation failed: Some packages, groups or modules are missing.
DEBUG util.py:461:  2024-03-14 10:02:14,938:
DEBUG util.py:461:  2024-03-14 10:02:14,938: Problems in request:
DEBUG util.py:461:  2024-03-14 10:02:14,938: missing packages: mrpt-devel. 

Answer: The error message is descriptive
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.w9mUKO (%build)]: [fail in build section]
=============
[signals.c:329:17: error: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-mismatch]
  329 |                 return;
      |                 ^~~~~~]: [detailed description of issue]


Answer: Issue: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-void
Resolution: return the value from the function or change the definition of the function core_handler, or contact the upstream
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.w9mUKO (%build)

Answer: fail in build section
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
signals.c:329:17: error: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-mismatch]
  329 |                 return;
      |                 ^~~~~~

Answer: detailed description of issue
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem: nothing provides requested (php-composer(phpdocumentor/type-resolver) >= 0.4.0 with php-composer(phpdocumentor/type-resolver) < 0.5)
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1
]: [DNF fails to resolve dependency]


Answer: Issue: php-composer(php documentor/type-resolver) version >= 0.4.0  and < 0.5 is not available
Resolution: If phpdocumentor/type-resolver is needed at runtime
- the package needd to be adapted to run with available version
-  OR required version needs to be added to the repository 
- OR this package be retired

If this package is only required at buildtime, for test suite:
- tests needs to be adapted for version available
- OR relevant unit tests ignored
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem: nothing provides requested (php-composer(phpdocumentor/type-resolver) >= 0.4.0 with php-composer(phpdocumentor/type-resolver) < 0.5)
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1


Answer: DNF fails to resolve dependency
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(cleo) < 3~~ with python3.12dist(cleo) >= 2.1) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(packaging) >= 23.1 needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(requests-toolbelt) < 2~~ with python3.12dist(requests-toolbelt) >= 1) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(build) < 2~~ with python3.12dist(build) >= 1.0.3) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(cachecontrol) < 0.15~~ with python3.12dist(cachecontrol) >= 0.14) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(cachecontrol[filecache]) < 0.15~~ with python3.12dist(cachecontrol[filecache]) >= 0.14) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(crashtest) < 0.5~~ with python3.12dist(crashtest) >= 0.4.1) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(dulwich) < 0.22~~ with python3.12dist(dulwich) >= 0.21.2) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(fastjsonschema) < 3~~ with python3.12dist(fastjsonschema) >= 2.18) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(installer) < 0.8~~ with python3.12dist(installer) >= 0.7) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(pexpect) < 5~~ with python3.12dist(pexpect) >= 4.7) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(pkginfo) < 2~~ with python3.12dist(pkginfo) >= 1.10) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(pyproject-hooks) < 2~~ with python3.12dist(pyproject-hooks) >= 1) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(tomlkit) < 1~~ with python3.12dist(tomlkit) >= 0.11.4) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(poetry-core) = 1.9 needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(trove-classifiers) >= 2022.5.19 needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base

Answer: Multiple required python packages are not available at their requested versions. Leading to failure of build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: General COPR build failure message, it doesn't provide any useful information beyond that.