fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-twisted-24.11.0-build/twisted-twisted-24.11.0/src/twisted/trial/_synctest.py", line 1459, in _runCleanups
    f(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/locale.py", line 615, in setlocale
    return _setlocale(category, locale)
locale.Error: unsupported locale setting

Answer: A failure of the function _setlocale beacuse of setting an unsupported locale.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED (skips=1068, errors=2, successes=10323)
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E2gVCY (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E2gVCY (%check)

Answer: The build failed during the %check part of the build.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [install ikiwiki-mass-rebuild /builddir/build/BUILD/ikiwiki-3.20200202.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/sbinChecking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/ikiwiki-3.20200202.4-build/BUILDROOT
RPM build warnings:
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/ikiwiki-mass-rebuild
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-calendar
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-comment
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-makerepo
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-transition
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-update-wikilist
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/ikiwiki-mass-rebuild]: [It reports an error that /usr/sbin/ikiwiki-mass-rebuild file was installed into a build root tree but the file was not enumerated in %files section.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because %{_sbindir} RPM macro was changed from /usr/sbin to /usr/bin value in filesystem-srpm-macros-3.18-30.fc42 and the spec file expect files in /usr/bin directory now. But the Makefile.PL build script still installs ikiwiki-mass-rebuild into /usr/sbin directory.
Resolution: Makefile.PL needs to be patched to install ikiwiki-mass-rebuild to %{_sbindir} path.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
install ikiwiki-mass-rebuild /builddir/build/BUILD/ikiwiki-3.20200202.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/sbinChecking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/ikiwiki-3.20200202.4-build/BUILDROOT
RPM build warnings:
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/ikiwiki-mass-rebuild
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-calendar
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-comment
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-makerepo
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-transition
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/ikiwiki-update-wikilist
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/ikiwiki-mass-rebuild

Answer: It reports an error that /usr/sbin/ikiwiki-mass-rebuild file was installed into a build root tree but the file was not enumerated in %files section.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:73 (find_package):
  Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Boost" (requested
  version 1.71.0) with any of the following names:

    BoostConfig.cmake
    boost-config.cmake

  Add the installation prefix of "Boost" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
  "Boost_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files.  If "Boost"
  provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it has been
  installed.


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!]: [Boost was not found by cmake]


Answer: Issue: Boost library wasn't found by cmake
Resolution: Either add fixed path where boost is located or add boost as dependency
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:73 (find_package):
  Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Boost" (requested
  version 1.71.0) with any of the following names:

    BoostConfig.cmake
    boost-config.cmake

  Add the installation prefix of "Boost" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
  "Boost_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files.  If "Boost"
  provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it has been
  installed.


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!

Answer: Boost was not found by cmake
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [configure: error: unrecognized option: `--js_engine=duktape']: [Error report during configuration phase.]
=============
[+ cd polkit-0.117]: [This line suggests that the version of polkit being built is 0.117, which doesn't support duktape yet.]


Answer: Issue: polkit present in RHEL8 and CentOS Stream 8 doesn't support duktape as JS engine. This was wrong configuration during possible package rebase.
Resolution: Do not use duktape dependency for polkit in RHEL8 or CentOS 8 Stream. Remove the '--js_engine' configuration option.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
configure: error: unrecognized option: `--js_engine=duktape'

Answer: Error report during configuration phase.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ cd polkit-0.117

Answer: This line suggests that the version of polkit being built is 0.117, which doesn't support duktape yet.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: package rpm-build-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 requires rpm = 4.19.91-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with redhat-rpm-config < 290-1 provided by redhat-rpm-config-289-1.fc40.noarch
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [This is the key message.]


Answer: Issue: The build requires rpm-build-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64
This package requires rpm = 4.19.91-1.fc40
However, rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with redhat-rpm-config < 290-1
The build environment has redhat-rpm-config-289-1.fc40.noarch installed
Resolution: Add an explicit dependency on the newer redhat-rpm-config into the spec file:
BuildRequires: redhat-rpm-config >= 290-1
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: package rpm-build-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 requires rpm = 4.19.91-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpm-4.19.91-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with redhat-rpm-config < 290-1 provided by redhat-rpm-config-289-1.fc40.noarch
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job

Answer: This is the key message.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(bindgen/default) >= 0.71.0 with crate(bindgen/default) < 0.72.0~)
]: [It says what failed.]
=============
[INFO: Going to install missing dynamic buildrequires]: [It says what was the build trying to do when the error appeared.]


Answer: Issue: One dynamic build requirement is the Rust crate bindgen with version constraints
Specifically, it needs bindgen version ≥ 0.71.0 and < 0.72.0
The system cannot find any package that provides this specific Rust crate dependency.
Resolution: Update the cargo.toml manifest file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(bindgen/default) >= 0.71.0 with crate(bindgen/default) < 0.72.0~)


Answer: It says what failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
INFO: Going to install missing dynamic buildrequires

Answer: It says what was the build trying to do when the error appeared.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/beakerlib-libraries-0.7-4.g22096f4.x86_64/usr/bin/get-test-deps]: [Build error about missing file.
]


Answer: Issue: The spec file is trying to %install file that is not there.
Resolution: Make sure all files the package is trying to install are there.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/beakerlib-libraries-0.7-4.g22096f4.x86_64/usr/bin/get-test-deps

Answer: Build error about missing file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/iptables': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/iptables-save': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/iptables-restore': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ip6tables': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ip6tables-save': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ip6tables-restore': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/arptables': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/arptables-save': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/arptables-restore': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ebtables': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ebtables-save': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ebtables-restore': No such file or directory]: [Can't move files to a directory that doesn't exist]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5cr5zv (%install)]: [Build failed during %install phase]


Answer: Issue: Build failed during the %install phase, when we were trying to move files to nonexistent directories.
Resolution: Create directories before you try to move files.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/iptables': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/iptables-save': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/iptables-restore': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ip6tables': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ip6tables-save': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ip6tables-restore': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/arptables': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/arptables-save': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/arptables-restore': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ebtables': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ebtables-save': No such file or directory
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/iptables-1.8.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/ebtables-restore': No such file or directory

Answer: Can't move files to a directory that doesn't exist
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5cr5zv (%install)

Answer: Build failed during %install phase
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: The version in the Python package metadata 0.0.0 normalizes to zero.
It's likely a packaging error caused by missing version information
(e.g. when using a version control system snapshot as a source).
Try providing the version information manually when building the Python package,
for example by setting the SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION environment variable if the package uses setuptools_scm.
If you are confident that the version of the Python package is intentionally zero,
you may %define the _python_dist_allow_version_zero macro in the spec file to disable this check.]: [These lines point out that the version in the Python metadata is zero.]


Answer: Issue: The error message explains that this is caused by missing version information.  This software is using ast from the standard library to parse the version from the file colorful/__init__.py.  In Python 3.14, the ast.Str class was removed, which is causing the VersionFinder class to incorrectly set the version to an empty string.

https://docs.python.org/3.14/whatsnew/3.14.html#id6
Resolution: Patch the software to use ast.Constant.value instead of ast.Str.s, which makes it compatible with Python 3.14.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: The version in the Python package metadata 0.0.0 normalizes to zero.
It's likely a packaging error caused by missing version information
(e.g. when using a version control system snapshot as a source).
Try providing the version information manually when building the Python package,
for example by setting the SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION environment variable if the package uses setuptools_scm.
If you are confident that the version of the Python package is intentionally zero,
you may %define the _python_dist_allow_version_zero macro in the spec file to disable this check.

Answer: These lines point out that the version in the Python metadata is zero.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c: In function ‘ExecShippy’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:1785:25: error: too many arguments to function ‘SYSTEM_BG’; expected 0, have 1
 1785 |                         SYSTEM_BG("splash.bmp");
      |                         ^~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:19:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:30:6: note: declared here
   30 | void SYSTEM_BG();
      |      ^~~~~~~~~]: [Compilation of a source file fails because the compiler found an incompatible function prototype.]


Answer: Issue: The source code is not compatible with the C23 standard. Specifically thje SYSTEM_BG() function is declared with an empty list of arguments, which means "no arguments" in C23. But the function is called with 1 argument causing the compilation to fail.
Resolution: The function declaration needs to be updated to be compliant with the C23 standard by specifying its arguments properly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c: In function ‘ExecShippy’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:1785:25: error: too many arguments to function ‘SYSTEM_BG’; expected 0, have 1
 1785 |                         SYSTEM_BG("splash.bmp");
      |                         ^~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.c:19:
/builddir/build/BUILD/shippy-1.5.4-build/shippy-1.5.4/shippy.h:30:6: note: declared here
   30 | void SYSTEM_BG();
      |      ^~~~~~~~~

Answer: Compilation of a source file fails because the compiler found an incompatible function prototype.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [test test::test_dump_proc_select ... FAILED
test test::test_dump_process_content ... FAILED]: [There are two failed tests in the testsuite, which makes the whole build to fail
]
=============
[failures:
    test::test_dump_proc_select
    test::test_dump_process_content]: [Another mention of the failed tests]


Answer: Issue: There are two failing tests (test_dump_proc_select, test_dump_process_content)  within the testsuite. 
Resolution: Review the failed tests, if they are caused by something arch-specific. They might be disabled or patched to pass the whole build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
test test::test_dump_proc_select ... FAILED
test test::test_dump_process_content ... FAILED

Answer: There are two failed tests in the testsuite, which makes the whole build to fail
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
failures:
    test::test_dump_proc_select
    test::test_dump_process_content

Answer: Another mention of the failed tests
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
]: [Build failed during the configuration phase not finding files from the bash-completion package.]


Answer: Issue: The libsecret project has a dependency on the bash-completion package, but package hasn't been installed.
Resolution: Install the bash-completion package into the buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig


Answer: Build failed during the configuration phase not finding files from the bash-completion package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [../../lib/util.c:1193:24: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' 'buf_len.localalias': optimization level attribute mismatch]: [it shows optimization level attribute mismatch]


Answer: Issue: With the always_inline attribute, the compiler errored out because it could not inline the function
Resolution: Turn off LTO for the project in the spec file or remove always_inline function attribute in the source code
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
../../lib/util.c:1193:24: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' 'buf_len.localalias': optimization level attribute mismatch

Answer: it shows optimization level attribute mismatch
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: chromedriver
No match for argument: chromium
No match for argument: chromium-headless
No match for argument: rubygem(selenium-webdriver)]: [Output of DNF command preparing the buildroot]


Answer: Issue: The build dependencies are not available
Resolution: There might be multiple reasons. In this specific case, Chromium is not available in s390x. Because it is not available on purpose, the s390x have to be excluded from build as suggested by the Fedora Guidelines:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_arch_specific_runtime_and_build_time_dependencies

The fix in this specific case is:

~~~
diff --git a/rubygem-actiontext.spec b/rubygem-actiontext.spec
index 578982a..9e1790a 100644
--- a/rubygem-actiontext.spec
+++ b/rubygem-actiontext.spec
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ BuildRequires: rubygem(capybara) >= 3.26
 BuildRequires: rubygem(puma)
 BuildRequires: rubygem(selenium-webdriver)
 BuildRequires: chromedriver chromium chromium-headless
+# Chromium availability is limited.
+# https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/blob/0d9761748509bb12051ab149d28c1052cd834f87/f/chromium.spec#_800
+ExclusiveArch: x86_64 aarch64 ppc64le noarch
 %{?with_js_recompilation:BuildRequires: %{_bindir}/npm}
 BuildArch: noarch
 
~~~
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: chromedriver
No match for argument: chromium
No match for argument: chromium-headless
No match for argument: rubygem(selenium-webdriver)

Answer: Output of DNF command preparing the buildroot
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/python3 /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/ocaml_files.py /builddir/build/BUILD/0install-2.18-build/BUILDROOT /usr/lib64/ocaml
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/argparse.py", line 1747, in _check_help
    formatter._expand_help(action)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/argparse.py", line 678, in _expand_help
    return help_string % params
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
TypeError: must be real number, not dict
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/ocaml_files.py", line 429, in <module>
    parser.add_argument('-i', '--install',
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                        action='store_true',
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                        default=False,
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                        help='install files instead of generating %files')
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/argparse.py", line 1561, in add_argument
    self._check_help(action)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/argparse.py", line 1749, in _check_help
    raise ValueError('badly formed help string') from exc
ValueError: badly formed help string
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.cKP6pB (%install)]: [/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/ocaml_files.py Python script failed.]


Answer: Issue: After upgrading Python 3.14 the argparse Python module rejected a help string with an unbound substitution variable.
Resolution: If the "%files" string should be a literal in the help text, escape the percent character with another percent character like "%%files".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/python3 /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/ocaml_files.py /builddir/build/BUILD/0install-2.18-build/BUILDROOT /usr/lib64/ocaml
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/argparse.py", line 1747, in _check_help
    formatter._expand_help(action)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/argparse.py", line 678, in _expand_help
    return help_string % params
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
TypeError: must be real number, not dict
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/ocaml_files.py", line 429, in <module>
    parser.add_argument('-i', '--install',
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                        action='store_true',
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                        default=False,
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                        help='install files instead of generating %files')
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/argparse.py", line 1561, in add_argument
    self._check_help(action)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/argparse.py", line 1749, in _check_help
    raise ValueError('badly formed help string') from exc
ValueError: badly formed help string
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.cKP6pB (%install)

Answer: /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/ocaml_files.py Python script failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error[E0432]: unresolved import `apple_flat_package`
  --> src/files.rs:26:5
   |
26 | use apple_flat_package::PkgReader;
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `apple_flat_package`
   |
   = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `apple_flat_package`, use `cargo add apple_flat_package` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`]: [During compilation there was attempt to import apple_flat_package which isn't present on the device]
=============
[error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `debpkg`
   --> src/files.rs:284:23
    |
284 |     let mut deb_pkg = debpkg::DebPkg::parse(deb_file)?;
    |                       ^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `debpkg`
    |
    = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `debpkg`, use `cargo add debpkg` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`]: [During compilation there was attempt to import dpkg_package which isn't present on the device]
=============
[error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `infer`
  --> src/files.rs:95:31
   |
95 |     let mut extension = match infer::get_from_path(compressed_file)? {
   |                               ^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `infer`
   |
   = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `infer`, use `cargo add infer` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`]: [During compilation there was attempt to import infer which isn't present on the device]
=============
[error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `sevenz_rust`
   --> src/files.rs:178:5
    |
178 |     sevenz_rust::decompress(file_reader, zip_parent).unwrap();
    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `sevenz_rust`
    |
    = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `sevenz_rust`, use `cargo add sevenz_rust` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
]: [During compilation there was attempt to import sevenz_rust which isn't present on the device]


Answer: Issue: Trying to import functions during rust compilation which aren't present locally and are missing from cargo.toml
Resolution: Either add them to cargo.toml or remove them from the source code
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error[E0432]: unresolved import `apple_flat_package`
  --> src/files.rs:26:5
   |
26 | use apple_flat_package::PkgReader;
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `apple_flat_package`
   |
   = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `apple_flat_package`, use `cargo add apple_flat_package` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`

Answer: During compilation there was attempt to import apple_flat_package which isn't present on the device
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `debpkg`
   --> src/files.rs:284:23
    |
284 |     let mut deb_pkg = debpkg::DebPkg::parse(deb_file)?;
    |                       ^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `debpkg`
    |
    = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `debpkg`, use `cargo add debpkg` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`

Answer: During compilation there was attempt to import dpkg_package which isn't present on the device
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `infer`
  --> src/files.rs:95:31
   |
95 |     let mut extension = match infer::get_from_path(compressed_file)? {
   |                               ^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `infer`
   |
   = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `infer`, use `cargo add infer` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`

Answer: During compilation there was attempt to import infer which isn't present on the device
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `sevenz_rust`
   --> src/files.rs:178:5
    |
178 |     sevenz_rust::decompress(file_reader, zip_parent).unwrap();
    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `sevenz_rust`
    |
    = help: if you wanted to use a crate named `sevenz_rust`, use `cargo add sevenz_rust` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`


Answer: During compilation there was attempt to import sevenz_rust which isn't present on the device
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ libappstream-glib                    x86_64 0.8.3-3.eln145            https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_eln_build_latest_basearch   1.4 MiB
 qpdf-devel                           x86_64 12.2.0-1.eln148           copr_base                                                        589.6 KiB
 qt5-qtbase-devel                     x86_64 5.15.16-2.eln145          https_kojipkgs_fedora]: [qpdf is at version 12 or higher.]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp: In lambda function:
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:29: error: âPointerHolderâ was not declared in this scope
  170 |                             PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
      |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:49: error: expected primary-expression before â>â token
  170 |                             PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
      |                                                 ^
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:51: error: âbufferâ was not declared in this scope; did you mean âBufferâ?
  170 |                             PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
      |                                                   ^~~~~~
      |                                                   Buffer
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:175:85: error: no matching function for call to âMagick::Blob::Blob(<brace-enclosed initializer list>)â
  175 |                             Magick::Blob blob{buffer->getBuffer(), buffer->getSize()};]: [Shows the failure during compilation.]


Answer: Issue: qpdf 12 and newer removed PointerHolder from public API in default configuration.
Resolution: Use std::shared_ptr type instead of PointerHolder.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 libappstream-glib                    x86_64 0.8.3-3.eln145            https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_eln_build_latest_basearch   1.4 MiB
 qpdf-devel                           x86_64 12.2.0-1.eln148           copr_base                                                        589.6 KiB
 qt5-qtbase-devel                     x86_64 5.15.16-2.eln145          https_kojipkgs_fedora

Answer: qpdf is at version 12 or higher.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp: In lambda function:
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:29: error: âPointerHolderâ was not declared in this scope
  170 |                             PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
      |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:49: error: expected primary-expression before â>â token
  170 |                             PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
      |                                                 ^
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:170:51: error: âbufferâ was not declared in this scope; did you mean âBufferâ?
  170 |                             PointerHolder<Buffer> buffer = obj.getStreamData(qpdf_dl_all);
      |                                                   ^~~~~~
      |                                                   Buffer
/builddir/build/BUILD/pdfmixtool-1.1.1-build/pdfmixtool-v1.1.1/src/operations/extract_images.cpp:175:85: error: no matching function for call to âMagick::Blob::Blob(<brace-enclosed initializer list>)â
  175 |                             Magick::Blob blob{buffer->getBuffer(), buffer->getSize()};

Answer: Shows the failure during compilation.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Package python3.11-flit-core-3.9.0-4.el9.noarch is already installed.No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(babel) >= 2.]: [Python 3.11 dependency 'babel >= 2.9' is not available.]
=============
[
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(cython) >= ]: [Python 3.11 dependency 'cython >= 3' is not available.]
=============
[
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(imagesize) >= 1.]: [Python 3.11 dependency 'imagesize >= 1.3' is not available.]
=============
[
Package python3.11-packaging-21.3-1.el9.noarch is already installed.No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(jinja2) >= ]: [Python 3.11 dependency 'jinja2 >= 3' is not available.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(pygments) >= 2.14']: [Python 3.11 dependency 'pygments >= 2.14' is not available.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(setuptools) >= 67']: [Python 3.11 dependency 'setuptools >= 67' is not available.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(snowballstemmer) >= 2']: [Python 3.11 dependency 'snowballstemmer >= 2' is not available.]


Answer: Issue: Dependencies are not available.
Resolution: Ensure dependencies are available in repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Package python3.11-flit-core-3.9.0-4.el9.noarch is already installed.No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(babel) >= 2.

Answer: Python 3.11 dependency 'babel >= 2.9' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(cython) >= 

Answer: Python 3.11 dependency 'cython >= 3' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(imagesize) >= 1.

Answer: Python 3.11 dependency 'imagesize >= 1.3' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Package python3.11-packaging-21.3-1.el9.noarch is already installed.No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(jinja2) >= 

Answer: Python 3.11 dependency 'jinja2 >= 3' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(pygments) >= 2.14'

Answer: Python 3.11 dependency 'pygments >= 2.14' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(setuptools) >= 67'

Answer: Python 3.11 dependency 'setuptools >= 67' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(snowballstemmer) >= 2'

Answer: Python 3.11 dependency 'snowballstemmer >= 2' is not available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(rusqlite/bundled) >= 0.28.0 with crate(rusqlite/bundled) < 0.29.0~)]: [It shows what searched package must provide. But there is non providing exactly this one.]


Answer: Issue: Fedora rust packages does not provide crate(rusqlite/bundled) crate. But there is package providing crate(rusqlite), so we need to avoid bundled feature.
Resolution: Comment out feature = bundled for rusqlite dependency.