fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png]: [Multiple unpackaged files were found.
]
=============
[ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/merkuro-24.01.95~1.gitcd92535-1.fc39.src.rpm) Config(fedora-39-x86_64) 3 minutes 13 seconds]: [Build exception report.]
=============
[Copr build error: Build failed]: [Final error printout, indicating that the build has failed.]


Answer: Issue: Multiple files were not tracked by the spec file, while being installed. This would cause issues during package installation, and or removal.
Resolution: Make sure that all installed files are tracked. If necessary, prune installed files, and make sure that only necessary files are installed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/org.kde.merkuro.calendar.png
   /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/org.kde.merkuro.mail.png

Answer: Multiple unpackaged files were found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/merkuro-24.01.95~1.gitcd92535-1.fc39.src.rpm) Config(fedora-39-x86_64) 3 minutes 13 seconds

Answer: Build exception report.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: Final error printout, indicating that the build has failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Program python3 (dbusmock) found: N]: [A build dependency is missing]
=============
[meson.build:371:6: ERROR: Problem encountered: Tests require python-dbusmoc]: [A dependency for running the test suite is missing]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because it was missing the python-dbusmock dependency.
Resolution: Add "BuildRequires: python3-dbusmock" to the spec file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Program python3 (dbusmock) found: N

Answer: A build dependency is missing
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meson.build:371:6: ERROR: Problem encountered: Tests require python-dbusmoc

Answer: A dependency for running the test suite is missing
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'libnvme-devel >= 1.11-1']: [It is the root cause for the failure.]


Answer: Issue: No matching package to install: 'libnvme-devel >= 1.11-1'
Resolution: Either fix the spec file Requires:/BuildRequires: or build the missing dependency in your COPR so that's it's available in the buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'libnvme-devel >= 1.11-1'

Answer: It is the root cause for the failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
    def test_curried_operator():
        import operator
    
        for k, v in vars(cop).items():
            if not callable(v):
                continue
    
            if not isinstance(v, toolz.curry):
                try:
                    # Make sure it is unary
                    v(1)
                except TypeError:
                    try:
                        v('x')
                    except TypeError:
                        pass
                    else:
                        continue
                    raise AssertionError(
                        'toolz.curried.operator.%s is not curried!' % k,
                    )
&amp;gt;           assert should_curry(getattr(operator, k)) == isinstance(v, toolz.curry), k
E           AssertionError: is_none
E           assert False == True
E            +  where False = should_curry(&amp;lt;built-in function is_none&amp;gt;)
E            +    where &amp;lt;built-in function is_none&amp;gt; = getattr(&amp;lt;module 'operator' from '/usr/lib64/python3.14/operator.py'&amp;gt;, 'is_none')
E            +  and   True = isinstance(&amp;lt;built-in function is_none&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;class 'toolz.functoolz.curry'&amp;gt;)
E            +    where &amp;lt;class 'toolz.functoolz.curry'&amp;gt; = toolz.curry

toolz/tests/test_curried.py:74: AssertionError]: [First failed test.]
=============
[    def test_has_keywords():
        assert has_keywords(lambda: None) is False
        assert has_keywords(lambda x: None) is False
        assert has_keywords(lambda x=1: None)
        assert has_keywords(lambda **kwargs: None)
        assert has_keywords(int)
        assert has_keywords(sorted)
        assert has_keywords(max)
>       assert has_keywords(map) is False
E       assert True is False
E        +  where True = has_keywords(map)

toolz/tests/test_inspect_args.py:289: AssertionError]: [Second failed test.]


Answer: Issue: Two tests failed.
Resolution: Fix failing tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

    def test_curried_operator():
        import operator
    
        for k, v in vars(cop).items():
            if not callable(v):
                continue
    
            if not isinstance(v, toolz.curry):
                try:
                    # Make sure it is unary
                    v(1)
                except TypeError:
                    try:
                        v('x')
                    except TypeError:
                        pass
                    else:
                        continue
                    raise AssertionError(
                        'toolz.curried.operator.%s is not curried!' % k,
                    )
&amp;gt;           assert should_curry(getattr(operator, k)) == isinstance(v, toolz.curry), k
E           AssertionError: is_none
E           assert False == True
E            +  where False = should_curry(&amp;lt;built-in function is_none&amp;gt;)
E            +    where &amp;lt;built-in function is_none&amp;gt; = getattr(&amp;lt;module 'operator' from '/usr/lib64/python3.14/operator.py'&amp;gt;, 'is_none')
E            +  and   True = isinstance(&amp;lt;built-in function is_none&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;class 'toolz.functoolz.curry'&amp;gt;)
E            +    where &amp;lt;class 'toolz.functoolz.curry'&amp;gt; = toolz.curry

toolz/tests/test_curried.py:74: AssertionError

Answer: First failed test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    def test_has_keywords():
        assert has_keywords(lambda: None) is False
        assert has_keywords(lambda x: None) is False
        assert has_keywords(lambda x=1: None)
        assert has_keywords(lambda **kwargs: None)
        assert has_keywords(int)
        assert has_keywords(sorted)
        assert has_keywords(max)
>       assert has_keywords(map) is False
E       assert True is False
E        +  where True = has_keywords(map)

toolz/tests/test_inspect_args.py:289: AssertionError

Answer: Second failed test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Total Discovered Tests: 65640
  Skipped          :    22 (0.03%)
  Unsupported      :  2608 (3.97%)
  Passed           : 62839 (95.73%)
  Expectedly Failed:   170 (0.26%)
  Failed           :     1 (0.00%)

Answer: Summary of the testsuite
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: LLVM :: Object/macho-invalid.test (40609 of 56997)

Answer: The name of the failed test.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Source option 6 is no longer supported. Use 7 or later.
error: Target option 6 is no longer supported. Use 7 or later.]: [indicates that source code uses legacy java version 6]
=============
[[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.fedoraproject.xmvn:xmvn-mojo:4.0.0.MBI:javadoc ]: [indicates that xmvn javadoc mojo failed]


Answer: Issue: The build failed when generating javadocs because specified source and target levels are too low for current Java.
Resolution: Update Maven project settings and set Java source and target values to later versions supported by current java compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Source option 6 is no longer supported. Use 7 or later.
error: Target option 6 is no longer supported. Use 7 or later.

Answer: indicates that source code uses legacy java version 6
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.fedoraproject.xmvn:xmvn-mojo:4.0.0.MBI:javadoc 

Answer: indicates that xmvn javadoc mojo failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [./client.go:382:31: non-constant format string in call to (*github.com/emersion/go-smtp.Client).cmd
./client.go:411:31: non-constant format string in call to (*github.com/emersion/go-smtp.Client).cmd
FAIL	github.com/emersion/go-smtp [build failed]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qQ7D5A (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qQ7D5A (%check)]: [It marks the build failure information and describes the issue.]


Answer: Issue: Go wants non-constant format strings to be explicitly handled
Resolution: Most likely convert the string.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
./client.go:382:31: non-constant format string in call to (*github.com/emersion/go-smtp.Client).cmd
./client.go:411:31: non-constant format string in call to (*github.com/emersion/go-smtp.Client).cmd
FAIL	github.com/emersion/go-smtp [build failed]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qQ7D5A (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qQ7D5A (%check)

Answer: It marks the build failure information and describes the issue.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
+ %generate_buildrequires
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eWXmd2: line 48: fg: no job contr]: [This macro doesn't exist therefore rpm will leave it as it is.]


Answer: Issue: Because the macro doesn't exist, it is interpreted as it is and executed in bash which interprets % as job control.
   
Resolution: Remove this line and specify all buildrequires as BuildRequires tag manually.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

+ %generate_buildrequires
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eWXmd2: line 48: fg: no job contr

Answer: This macro doesn't exist therefore rpm will leave it as it is.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [type=AVC msg=audit(03/31/2025 04:19:41.572:26492) : avc:  denied  { unlink } for  pid=291124 comm=pmlogger name=pmlogger.primary.socket dev="tmpfs" ino=18196 scontext=system_u:system_r:pcp_pmlogger_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file permissive=0 ]: [pmlogger AVC violation]
=============
[type=AVC msg=audit(03/31/2025 04:19:43.609:26500) : avc:  denied  { getattr } for  pid=297667 comm=pmlogger path=/run/pcp/pmlogger.291124.socket dev="tmpfs" ino=18195 scontext=system_u:system_r:pcp_pmlogger_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file permissive=0 ]: [pmlogger AVC violation]


Answer: Issue: pmlogger (part of PCP) is trying to work with files on a tmpfs and/or with sockets, which is not allowed by selinux policy.
Resolution: Please report this issue to the PCP team as the pcp-selinux policy needs to be updated.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
type=AVC msg=audit(03/31/2025 04:19:41.572:26492) : avc:  denied  { unlink } for  pid=291124 comm=pmlogger name=pmlogger.primary.socket dev="tmpfs" ino=18196 scontext=system_u:system_r:pcp_pmlogger_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file permissive=0 

Answer: pmlogger AVC violation
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
type=AVC msg=audit(03/31/2025 04:19:43.609:26500) : avc:  denied  { getattr } for  pid=297667 comm=pmlogger path=/run/pcp/pmlogger.291124.socket dev="tmpfs" ino=18195 scontext=system_u:system_r:pcp_pmlogger_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file permissive=0 

Answer: pmlogger AVC violation
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [        "No package matching 'pcp-pmda-openmetrics' found available, installed or updated"]: [Missing package]


Answer: Issue: Can not find a package the playbook is looking for
Resolution: The pcp-pmda-openmetrics package is not available on CentOS-7. This package was introduced for CentOS >= 8. Please report this issue to ansible-pcp/metrics-role maintainers.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
        "No package matching 'pcp-pmda-openmetrics' found available, installed or updated"

Answer: Missing package
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
==TESTS DONE, FAILED: Passed 0  Failed 1  Time 0:04
make: *** [Makefile:176: smoke-test] Error 10
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.fdnHgq (%check)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.fdnHgq (%check)


Answer: This part indicates that the build failed in the `%check` section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
g++ -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer  -I. -Wall -Wextra -Wfloat-conversion -Wlogical-op -Werror -MMD -I/builddir/build/BUILD/verilator-5.030-build/verilator-5.030/test_regress/../include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/verilator-5.030-build/verilator-5.030/test_regress/../include/vltstd -DVM_COVERAGE=0 -DVM_SC=0 -DVM_TIMING=0 -DVM_TRACE=1 -DVM_TRACE_FST=0 -DVM_TRACE_VCD=1 -faligned-new -fcf-protection=none -Wno-bool-operation -Wno-shadow -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-unused-but-set-parameter -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused-variable      -DVERILATOR=1 -DVL_DEBUG=1 -DTEST_OBJ_DIR=obj_vlt/t_a1_first_cc -DVM_PREFIX=Vt_a1_first_cc -DVM_PREFIX_INCLUDE="<Vt_a1_first_cc.h>" -DVM_PREFIX_ROOT_INCLUDE="<Vt_a1_first_cc___024root.h>" -DT_A1_FIRST_CC   -DVL_LOCK_SPINS=10000 -O0  -c -o Vt_a1_first_cc__main.o ../../obj_vlt/t_a1_first_cc/Vt_a1_first_cc__main.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/c++/14/x86_64-redhat-linux/bits/os_defines.h:39,
                 from /usr/include/c++/14/x86_64-redhat-linux/bits/c++config.h:2524,
                 from /usr/include/c++/14/bits/memoryfwd.h:48,
                 from /usr/include/c++/14/memory:63,
                 from ../../obj_vlt/t_a1_first_cc/Vt_a1_first_cc__main.cpp:3:
/usr/include/features.h:435:4: error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) [-Werror=cpp]
  435 | #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
      |    ^~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors


Answer: There is a warning emited by compiler. And option `D_FORTIFY_SOURCE` treat all warnings as errors.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ dos2unix -k -o CHANGELOG.markdown README.markdown
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IjEPWr: line 46: dos2unix: command not found
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IjEPWr (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IjEPWr (%prep)]: [The build process complains about a missing command: dos2unix.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to a missing dos2unix command.
Resolution: Add a BuildRequires to the specfile with a package that provides the necessary command.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ dos2unix -k -o CHANGELOG.markdown README.markdown
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IjEPWr: line 46: dos2unix: command not found
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IjEPWr (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IjEPWr (%prep)

Answer: The build process complains about a missing command: dos2unix.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.command.upload']: [Python module distutils was not found.]


Answer: Issue: Traceback occured while trying to use "upload" method. Module that provides upload function seems not to be present.
Resolution: Add buildrequire for distutils package into specfile:
BuildRequires:  python3-distutils
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.command.upload'

Answer: Python module distutils was not found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/credcheck-3.0-8.el8.s390x/usr/share/pgsql/extension/credcheck.control]: [The credcheck.control file was not found in the expected directory.]


Answer: Issue: The credcheck.control file was not fund in the expected directory, it was named incorrectly, it is in the wrong place or it is missing.
Resolution: Ensure that the credcheck.control file is created, named correctly and stored in the correct directory.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/credcheck-3.0-8.el8.s390x/usr/share/pgsql/extension/credcheck.control

Answer: The credcheck.control file was not found in the expected directory.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to register machine: Connection timed out]: [Error message with return code]


Answer: Issue: Problem with initialization of the buildroot. Some references links to SELinux blocking the connection: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2809#issuecomment-314050290
Resolution: Restart and hope.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to register machine: Connection timed out

Answer: Error message with return code
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c: In function '_wrap__ldns_rr_new_frm_str':
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c:8418:15: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
 8418 |   resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj,
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c:1259:1: note: declared here
 1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c: In function '_wrap_ldns_rr_new_question_frm_str':
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c:8466:15: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
 8466 |   resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj,
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c:1259:1: note: declared here]: [Build failed because function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput' expected 3 arguments.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to changes in SWIG 4.3.0.
There is new declaration of SWIG_Python_AppendOutput is now:
SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void);
The 3rd parameter is new and the new $isvoid special variable  should be passed to it.
Resolution: There are two ways how to solve it.
* Add the 3rd parameter to indicate whether or not the wrapped function returns void.

* or also consider replacing with:
SWIG_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj);
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c: In function '_wrap__ldns_rr_new_frm_str':
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c:8418:15: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
 8418 |   resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj,
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c:1259:1: note: declared here
 1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c: In function '_wrap_ldns_rr_new_question_frm_str':
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c:8466:15: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
 8466 |   resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj,
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./contrib/python/ldns_wrapper.c:1259:1: note: declared here

Answer: Build failed because function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput' expected 3 arguments.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/desktop-file-qpa-platform-xcb.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file res/linux/org.mixxx.Mixxx.desktop.rej
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Dpx66n (%prep)]: [Build failed in %prep phase on applying desktop-file-qpa-platform-xcb.patch patch.]


Answer: Issue: patch tool rejected the patch file. That means that the patch file does not match the unpacked sources.
Resolution: Read the rejected hunk stored in res/linux/org.mixxx.Mixxx.desktop.rej file and compare it to the unpacked sources to be built and to the sources the patch was created from. Then port the patch from the patch' sources to the sources used in the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/desktop-file-qpa-platform-xcb.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file res/linux/org.mixxx.Mixxx.desktop.rej
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Dpx66n (%prep)

Answer: Build failed in %prep phase on applying desktop-file-qpa-platform-xcb.patch patch.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

 Additional repo http_kojipkgs_fedorapr 100% |  84.1 KiB/s |   4.1 KiB |  00m00

Answer: Your build is using additional non-standard repositories. You may check how it is defined.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pandas)'
Package python3-pip-22.0.4-1.el9.noarch is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(seaborn)']: [It shows which dependencies could not be installed.]
=============
[Not all dependencies satisfied]: [It shows the general error about dependencies not satisfied.]


Answer: Issue: Not all dependencies were installed.
Resolution: Add or enable repository which has the missing dependencies available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pandas)'
Package python3-pip-22.0.4-1.el9.noarch is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(seaborn)'

Answer: It shows which dependencies could not be installed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Not all dependencies satisfied

Answer: It shows the general error about dependencies not satisfied.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: python3dist(numpy) >= 2.1.1]: [This line indicates that the requested package python3dist(numpy) >= 2.1.1 is not available in the installed repositories.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed due to unmet dependency on python3dist(numpy) >= 2.1.1.
Resolution: All dependencies must be available from installed repositories at build time. Ensure that all dependencies have their names and version constraints properly specified before running build.

If necessary, substitute dependencies, or change version constraints.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(numpy) >= 2.1.1

Answer: This line indicates that the requested package python3dist(numpy) >= 2.1.1 is not available in the installed repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    error generating index.html: No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml (RDoc::Error)]: [File `/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml` is not present, causing error.]
=============
[ERROR:  While executing gem ... (RDoc::Error)]: [Error encountered while executing RDoc.]


Answer: Issue: Expected file `/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml` is not present. Causing failure during documentation build.

This is probably due to incorrectly installed, or missing`rdoc-6.8.0` gem, which is supposed to provide it.
Resolution: Ensure that the `rdoc` package is properly installed and verified before build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    error generating index.html: No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml (RDoc::Error)

Answer: File `/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml` is not present, causing error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR:  While executing gem ... (RDoc::Error)

Answer: Error encountered while executing RDoc.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 20:07:50 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: File '/usr/share/grafana/conf/defaults.ini' should contain '^ *content_security_policy += +true *$' 
:: [ 20:07:50 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: File '/usr/share/grafana/conf/sample.ini' should contain 'content_security_policy += +true *$' 
]: [Check if grafana configuration is set to prevent a XSS]


Answer: Issue: grafana.ini config file is not configured to prevent some sort of XSS attacks.
Resolution: Fix the /etc/grafana/grafana.ini file and set "content_security_policy" to "true".
Report the issue to the grafana team and ask for a fix.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 20:07:50 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: File '/usr/share/grafana/conf/defaults.ini' should contain '^ *content_security_policy += +true *$' 
:: [ 20:07:50 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: File '/usr/share/grafana/conf/sample.ini' should contain 'content_security_policy += +true *$' 


Answer: Check if grafana configuration is set to prevent a XSS
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'go-vendor-tools'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun]: [This snippet contains the error message: that the go-vendor-tools package could not be installed.]


Answer: Issue: The go-vendor-tools package is not available in the repositories.
Resolution: Double check the package name. Make sure to build go-vendor-tools first if it is a dependency of the current package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'go-vendor-tools'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun

Answer: This snippet contains the error message: that the go-vendor-tools package could not be installed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1339:49: error: redefinition of âglib_autoptr_clear_GtkStackPageâ]: [Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.]
=============
[
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1338:43: error: redefinition of âglib_autoptr_cleanup_GtkStackPageâ
 1338 | #define _GLIB_AUTOPTR_FUNC_NAME(TypeName) glib_autoptr_cleanup_##TypeNa]: [Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.]
=============
[ANUP_FUNCâ
  182 | G_DEFINE_AUTOPTR_CLEANUP_FUNC(GtkStackPage, g_object_unref)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1338:43: error: redefinition of âglib_autopt]: [Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.]
=============
[_CLEANUP_FUNC(GtkStackPage, g_object_unref)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1338:43: error: redefinition of âglib_autoptr_cleanup_GtkStackPageâ
 1338 | #defin]: [Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.]
=============
[(GtkStackPage, g_object_unref)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1338:43: error: redefinition of âglib_autoptr_cleanup_GtkStackPageâ
 1338 | #define _GLIB_AUTOP]: [Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.]
=============
[ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.]: [A message about a final compilation termination.]
=============
[
FAILED: src/libide/tweaks/libide-tweaks-46.a.p/ide-tweaks-window.c.]: [An error message indicating a build error and the affected filename.]


Answer: Issue: Attempted redefinitions of variables defined elsewhere already.
Resolution: This usually involves fixing the issue upstream, and/or downgrading the library that the build depends on to a previously working version before the API break.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1339:49: error: redefinition of âglib_autoptr_clear_GtkStackPageâ

Answer: Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1338:43: error: redefinition of âglib_autoptr_cleanup_GtkStackPageâ
 1338 | #define _GLIB_AUTOPTR_FUNC_NAME(TypeName) glib_autoptr_cleanup_##TypeNa

Answer: Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ANUP_FUNCâ
  182 | G_DEFINE_AUTOPTR_CLEANUP_FUNC(GtkStackPage, g_object_unref)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1338:43: error: redefinition of âglib_autopt

Answer: Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
_CLEANUP_FUNC(GtkStackPage, g_object_unref)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1338:43: error: redefinition of âglib_autoptr_cleanup_GtkStackPageâ
 1338 | #defin

Answer: Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
(GtkStackPage, g_object_unref)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:1338:43: error: redefinition of âglib_autoptr_cleanup_GtkStackPageâ
 1338 | #define _GLIB_AUTOP

Answer: Information about an attempt to redefine a previously defined variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

Answer: A message about a final compilation termination.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

FAILED: src/libide/tweaks/libide-tweaks-46.a.p/ide-tweaks-window.c.

Answer: An error message indicating a build error and the affected filename.