fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [      File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
        raise ConfigError(msg)
    sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. ]
=============
[ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. ]
=============
[      File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
        raise ConfigError(msg)
    sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. ]
=============
[ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file. ]


Answer: Issue: There was a breaking change in Sphinx 8.2.x. The projects need to update their codebase.
Resolution: In conf.py should be 
intersphinx_mapping = {'python': ('http://docs.python.org/', None)}
instead of
intersphinx_mapping = {'http://docs.python.org/': None}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
      File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
        raise ConfigError(msg)
    sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).

Answer: The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 411884 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
:: [ 20:46:57 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command './Install < /dev/null' (Expected 0, got 1)
:]: [Shows core-dump record.]


Answer: Issue: /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python core dumped
Resolution: This was an issue on older llvm (see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-70250 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-66060) which should be already fixed. If you see this error re-occure, please report it to the bcc team (kernel).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 411884 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
:: [ 20:46:57 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command './Install < /dev/null' (Expected 0, got 1)
:

Answer: Shows core-dump record.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.
Configuration error:
Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: Project documentation as configured is not buildable with sphinx of this version.
Resolution: Fix the documentation configuration either by changing the source code or by adding a patch with fix.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.
Configuration error:
Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).

Answer: Error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [audemo.c: In function ‘rescanCB’:
audemo.c:524:23: error: passing argument 2 of ‘XawListChange’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  524 |                       (const char **)makeFileList(globals->fileNames, globals->numFiles),
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                       |
      |                       const char **
In file included from audemo.c:97:
/usr/include/X11/Xaw/List.h:170:26: note: expected ‘char **’ but argument is of type ‘const char **’
  170 |  String                 *list,
      |  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~]: [A compiler errors on a wrong argument to XawListChange() function call.]


Answer: Issue: XawListChange() function changed a type of the second argument from "const char **" to "String *".
Resolution: Change a type cast of of the second argument from "(const char **) to "(String *)".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
audemo.c: In function ‘rescanCB’:
audemo.c:524:23: error: passing argument 2 of ‘XawListChange’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  524 |                       (const char **)makeFileList(globals->fileNames, globals->numFiles),
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                       |
      |                       const char **
In file included from audemo.c:97:
/usr/include/X11/Xaw/List.h:170:26: note: expected ‘char **’ but argument is of type ‘const char **’
  170 |  String                 *list,
      |  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~

Answer: A compiler errors on a wrong argument to XawListChange() function call.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-40-x86_64-1710410771.274888/root/ --releasever 40 install @buildsys-build --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontex]: [This snippet states that dnf5 command failed]
=============
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarc]: [This snippet states, why exactly dnf5 failed: could not install package which is needed by another package as a dependency.]


Answer: Issue: Package required by another package cannot be installed because nothing provides it. (It cannot be found)
The redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch package is for a much older fedora version (34) and in repos for a current fedora version its dependencies may not be present
Resolution: Update the required packages of this build, so no out-of-date ones are present.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-40-x86_64-1710410771.274888/root/ --releasever 40 install @buildsys-build --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontex

Answer: This snippet states that dnf5 command failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarc

Answer: This snippet states, why exactly dnf5 failed: could not install package which is needed by another package as a dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ xwfb-run -c mutter -- make test
Xwayland failed to start!]: [Xwayland that is required for running test suite failed to start.]


Answer: Issue: Test suite for package was no run.
Resolution: It needs to be investigate what's the cause of Xwayland start issue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ xwfb-run -c mutter -- make test
Xwayland failed to start!

Answer: Xwayland that is required for running test suite failed to start.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearc]: [No provider for the clang = 13.0.0 was found.]


Answer: Issue: No available package provides clang==13.0.0 dependency.
Resolution: Ensure that package providing clang==13.0.0 is available and that it is present in the repository.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearc

Answer: No provider for the clang = 13.0.0 was found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CC=clang]: [clang has been selected as the default C compiler.]
=============
[CXX=clang++]: [clang++ has been selected as the default C++ compiler.]


Answer: Issue: The build system is passing the option -flto=n to the linker even though this flag is unsupported on clang 20 (and possibly newer versions).
Resolution: The project's build system should be updated to only use the -flto-n option if the compiler supports it.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG: install: cannot stat 'etc/account-serrver.conf-sample': No such file or directory]: [Expected file `etc/account-serrver.conf-sample` was not found in its expected location.

Name of the file appears to be a typo.]
=============
[INFO: EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600, in do_with_status
    raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output), child.returncode)
mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed: 
 # bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/openstack-swift.spec
]: [Error indicating failed mock build. It isn't actual cause of the issue, rather a stack trace of the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: Name of  file `account-serrver.conf-sample` contains a typo. Therefore it cannot be present at the expected location. Causing build to fail.
Resolution: Fix typo in the file name `account-serrver.conf-sample`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG: install: cannot stat 'etc/account-serrver.conf-sample': No such file or directory

Answer: Expected file `etc/account-serrver.conf-sample` was not found in its expected location.

Name of the file appears to be a typo.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
INFO: EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600, in do_with_status
    raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output), child.returncode)
mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed: 
 # bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/openstack-swift.spec


Answer: Error indicating failed mock build. It isn't actual cause of the issue, rather a stack trace of the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(picky) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky) < 8.0.0~)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-krb/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(picky-krb/default) < 0.10.0~)
 Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(picky/x509) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky/x509) < 8.0.0~)
 Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/default) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/default) < 2.0.0~)
 Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/v4) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/v4) < 2.0.0~)]: [Package manager reports issues with resolution of dependencies. 5 required packages were not found in installed repositories.]


Answer: Issue: Some of the dependencies were not available.
Resolution: All packages required for the successful build must be available in the installed repositories with appropriate versions. Check repositories for presence of required packages, adjusting constraints on versions as necessary.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(picky) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky) < 8.0.0~)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-krb/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(picky-krb/default) < 0.10.0~)
 Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(picky/x509) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky/x509) < 8.0.0~)
 Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/default) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/default) < 2.0.0~)
 Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/v4) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/v4) < 2.0.0~)

Answer: Package manager reports issues with resolution of dependencies. 5 required packages were not found in installed repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/llvm-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64.debug
]: [Files /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite and /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64.debug are not included in the final package.
]


Answer: Issue: The error message indicates that the RPM package installation process detected files that were installed on the system but were not included in the RPM package itself. This is a common issue in package maintenance.
Resolution: Missing Files: Ensure that all necessary files are included in the RPM package. This might involve adjusting the spec file section %files to include additional files or directories.
Incorrect File Permissions: Verify that the file permissions of the included files are correct. Incorrect permissions can prevent the RPM package manager from installing files properly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/llvm-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64.debug


Answer: Files /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite and /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64.debug are not included in the final package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [> fastify@5.2.2 unit
> borp --reporter=@jsumners/line-reporter --coverage --check-coverage

RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.concurrency" is out of range. It must be >= 1 && <= 4294967295. Received 0
    at new Test (node:internal/test_runner/test:475:9)
    at createTestTree (node:internal/test_runner/harness:82:16)
    at run (node:internal/test_runner/runner:676:16)
    at runWithTypeScript (file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/lib/run.js:237:12)
    at async file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/borp.js:150:18 {
  code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)]: [> fastify@5.2.2 unit
> borp --reporter=@jsumners/line-reporter --coverage --check-coverage

RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.concurrency" is out of range. It must be >= 1 && <= 4294967295. Received 0
    at new Test (node:internal/test_runner/test:475:9)
    at createTestTree (node:internal/test_runner/harness:82:16)
    at run (node:internal/test_runner/runner:676:16)
    at runWithTypeScript (file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/lib/run.js:237:12)
    at async file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/borp.js:150:18 {
  code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)]


Answer: Issue: Unit tests for fastify from upstream github repository failed.
Resolution: Please check upstream repository and fix this issue in upstream as well. Also please do not forget to report this issue, in case it is not fixed yet.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
> fastify@5.2.2 unit
> borp --reporter=@jsumners/line-reporter --coverage --check-coverage

RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.concurrency" is out of range. It must be >= 1 && <= 4294967295. Received 0
    at new Test (node:internal/test_runner/test:475:9)
    at createTestTree (node:internal/test_runner/harness:82:16)
    at run (node:internal/test_runner/runner:676:16)
    at runWithTypeScript (file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/lib/run.js:237:12)
    at async file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/borp.js:150:18 {
  code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)

Answer: > fastify@5.2.2 unit
> borp --reporter=@jsumners/line-reporter --coverage --check-coverage

RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.concurrency" is out of range. It must be >= 1 && <= 4294967295. Received 0
    at new Test (node:internal/test_runner/test:475:9)
    at createTestTree (node:internal/test_runner/harness:82:16)
    at run (node:internal/test_runner/runner:676:16)
    at runWithTypeScript (file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/lib/run.js:237:12)
    at async file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/borp.js:150:18 {
  code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2]: [Reason why the package cannot be built]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2]: [Reason why the package cannot be built]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2]: [Reason why the package cannot be built]


Answer: Issue: Available version of `golang` in the repos doesn't satisfy the minimal requirements
Resolution: Evaluate whether the version requirement is needed, or package the appropriate version of the Go that satisfies the requirement.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2

Answer: Reason why the package cannot be built
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ubnxKR (%build)]: [the problem is in the build section ]
=============
[bannergrab.c:653:36: error: passing argument 2 of ‘signal’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  653 |                         signal(14, timeoutHandler);
      |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                    |
      |                                    void (*)(void)]: [Detailed description of the issue ]
=============
[error: passing argument 2 of ‘signal’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  679 |                         signal(14, timeoutHandler);
      |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                    |
      |                                    void (*)(void)]: [Detailed description of error]


Answer: Issue: There is an issue in the source code, probably the API of signal function has changed, so the input arguments must be adjusted
Resolution: Adjust the input arguments to be compatible with the new API. make downstream patch or contact upstream
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ubnxKR (%build)

Answer: the problem is in the build section
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
bannergrab.c:653:36: error: passing argument 2 of ‘signal’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  653 |                         signal(14, timeoutHandler);
      |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                    |
      |                                    void (*)(void)

Answer: Detailed description of the issue
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: passing argument 2 of ‘signal’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  679 |                         signal(14, timeoutHandler);
      |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                    |
      |                                    void (*)(void)

Answer: Detailed description of error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [compress.c:618:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
  618 | zero = 0;
      | ^~~~
compress.c:618:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'zero' [-Wimplicit-int]]: [The build is failing due to a compiler error related to a implicit ‘int’ declaration.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because of compiler reports the error about [-Wimplicit-int].
Resolution: Check the file, line, and variable reported in the compiler error for a missing type declaration. Add  ‘int’ to this variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
compress.c:618:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
  618 | zero = 0;
      | ^~~~
compress.c:618:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'zero' [-Wimplicit-int]

Answer: The build is failing due to a compiler error related to a implicit ‘int’ declaration.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Running webpack...
make: *** [Makefile:924: public/assets/js/index.js] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
]: [Webpack failed as a part of make.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3XOkK4 (%build)
]: [Failed on %build]


Answer: Issue: Problem is likely with mismatch of js modules/common js in webpack

Resolution: Try changing webpack's config file extension from .js to .mjs
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Running webpack...
make: *** [Makefile:924: public/assets/js/index.js] Segmentation fault (core dumped)


Answer: Webpack failed as a part of make.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3XOkK4 (%build)


Answer: Failed on %build
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
checking whether the C compiler works... ]: [The ./configure commands looks for gcc and can't find it]


Answer: Issue: The gcc command is not available in the buildroot
Resolution: Edit the spec file and add a new buildtime dependency for gcc.

    BuildRequires: gcc
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

checking whether the C compiler works... 

Answer: The ./configure commands looks for gcc and can't find it
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Hhv7]: [The Executing(%check) is the section that fails. ]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/webmock-3.18.1/usr/share/gems/gems/webmock-3.18.1/minitest/test_helper.rb:13:in `<top (required)>': uninitialized constant MiniTest (NameError)

test_class = defined?(MiniTest::Test) ? MiniTest::Test : MiniTest::Unit::TestCase
                                                         ^^^^^^^^
Did you mean?  Minitest
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:127:in `require'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:127:in `require'
	from <internal:dir>:411:in `glob'
	from -e:1:in `<main>']: [The compilation of a test file (because we are in the %check section) failed here, claiming that the `MiniTest` ruby package doesn't exist.]


Answer: Issue: The `MiniTest` ruby package is not available at the ruby compilation time.
Resolution: If the MiniTest package exists, you need to make it available on rubypath. If not, you need to provide the MiniTest package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Hhv7

Answer: The Executing(%check) is the section that fails.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/webmock-3.18.1/usr/share/gems/gems/webmock-3.18.1/minitest/test_helper.rb:13:in `<top (required)>': uninitialized constant MiniTest (NameError)

test_class = defined?(MiniTest::Test) ? MiniTest::Test : MiniTest::Unit::TestCase
                                                         ^^^^^^^^
Did you mean?  Minitest
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:127:in `require'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:127:in `require'
	from <internal:dir>:411:in `glob'
	from -e:1:in `<main>'

Answer: The compilation of a test file (because we are in the %check section) failed here, claiming that the `MiniTest` ruby package doesn't exist.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    /builddir/build/SPECS/opentofu.spec line 42: autopatch: no matching patches in range]: [The relevant error message saying that the  'autopatch' rpm macro did not find any matching patches.]


Answer: Issue: The '%autopatch' rpm macro couldn't find any patches defined in the spec file.
Resolution: Either remove the '%autopatch' line from the specfile or switch to the '%autosetup' macro that provides added convenience.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    /builddir/build/SPECS/opentofu.spec line 42: autopatch: no matching patches in range

Answer: The relevant error message saying that the  'autopatch' rpm macro did not find any matching patches.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: 
 Problem: package libavfilter-free-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libtesseract.so.5.3.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from appstream and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_gears6_25_04_0
  - cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from appstream and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime
  - package opencv-text-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libtesseract.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from https_download_rockylinux_org_pub_rocky_9_devel_x86_64_os and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_gears6_25_04_0
  - cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from https_download_rockylinux_org_pub_rocky_9_devel_x86_64_os and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime
  - package libavfilter-free-devel-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libavfilter-free = 7.0.2-10.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package libavfilter-free-devel-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libavfilter.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - package opencv-devel-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libopencv_text.so.410()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package opencv-devel-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires opencv-text(x86-64) = 4.10.0-8.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
]: [There are conflicting dependencies for the package]


Answer: Issue: It wasn't possible to resolve the dependency chain as the dependencies collide with each other
Resolution: Resolve dependency chain and check that all of the required versions of each dependency are compatible with each other
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: 
 Problem: package libavfilter-free-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libtesseract.so.5.3.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from appstream and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_gears6_25_04_0
  - cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from appstream and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime
  - package opencv-text-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libtesseract.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from https_download_rockylinux_org_pub_rocky_9_devel_x86_64_os and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_gears6_25_04_0
  - cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from https_download_rockylinux_org_pub_rocky_9_devel_x86_64_os and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime
  - package libavfilter-free-devel-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libavfilter-free = 7.0.2-10.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package libavfilter-free-devel-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libavfilter.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - package opencv-devel-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libopencv_text.so.410()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package opencv-devel-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires opencv-text(x86-64) = 4.10.0-8.el9, but none of the providers can be installed


Answer: There are conflicting dependencies for the package
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [cp: cannot stat 'nmbl.spec': No such file or directory]: [File `nmbl.spec` couldn't be found at the expected location. Program `cp` couldn't be successfully executed.]
=============
[Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 115, in <module>
    run_cmd(mock + ['--chroot', 'su - {0} -c {1}'.format(user, cmd)])
    ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd
    return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)]: [Traceback from execution of program written in Python. It indicates that a sub-process launched with specific arguments failed. The exception raised is meant to indicate that failure.]


Answer: Issue: File `nmbl.spec` was not at the expected location.
Resolution: Check presence of `nmbl.spec`in the build environment and ensure that it is present at the expected location, or change the expected location to match the actual location of the file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
cp: cannot stat 'nmbl.spec': No such file or directory

Answer: File `nmbl.spec` couldn't be found at the expected location. Program `cp` couldn't be successfully executed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 115, in <module>
    run_cmd(mock + ['--chroot', 'su - {0} -c {1}'.format(user, cmd)])
    ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd
    return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)

Answer: Traceback from execution of program written in Python. It indicates that a sub-process launched with specific arguments failed. The exception raised is meant to indicate that failure.