fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/glsl-language-server-0.5.0-build/glsl-language-server-0.5.0/src/main.cpp:14:10: fatal error: glslang/MachineIndependent/Initialize.h: No such file or directory
   14 | #include <glslang/MachineIndependent/Initialize.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [GCC compiler error that an included file was not found on the include path.]
=============
[gmake: *** [Makefile:139: all] Error 2]: [GNU Make process failed.]


Answer: Issue: The included file was not found on the include path.
Resolution: Inspect whether the version of the library that is being included matches the upstream. If not, contact the upstream or try to patch the file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/glsl-language-server-0.5.0-build/glsl-language-server-0.5.0/src/main.cpp:14:10: fatal error: glslang/MachineIndependent/Initialize.h: No such file or directory
   14 | #include <glslang/MachineIndependent/Initialize.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: GCC compiler error that an included file was not found on the include path.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gmake: *** [Makefile:139: all] Error 2

Answer: GNU Make process failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'local':
  - Status code: 403 for https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f39-build/latest/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 38.145.60.21)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'local': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried
]: [Unable to download packages from Koji: the webserver returns status code 403.]


Answer: Issue: Build system cannot install packages due to repository not being available.
Resolution: Check if Koji has an outage. You can also report this problem to Fedora Infrastructure. These network errors are transient - try the build later.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'local':
  - Status code: 403 for https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f39-build/latest/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 38.145.60.21)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'local': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried


Answer: Unable to download packages from Koji: the webserver returns status code 403.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x9gxfL (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x9gxfL (%check)]: [cause of the failed rpm build (check phase)]
=============
[>               raise exceptions.RefResolutionError(
                    "Unresolvable JSON pointer: %r" % fragment
                )
E               jsonschema.exceptions.RefResolutionError: Unresolvable JSON pointer: 'task_info'

/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/jsonschema/validators.py:813: RefResolutionError]: [reason why the tests failed]


Answer: Issue: tests have failed during the %check phase
Resolution: fix the tests
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x9gxfL (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x9gxfL (%check)

Answer: cause of the failed rpm build (check phase)
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
>               raise exceptions.RefResolutionError(
                    "Unresolvable JSON pointer: %r" % fragment
                )
E               jsonschema.exceptions.RefResolutionError: Unresolvable JSON pointer: 'task_info'

/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/jsonschema/validators.py:813: RefResolutionError

Answer: reason why the tests failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RuntimeError: Cloning into '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-v0djc4ql/freeipa'...]: [Traceback is seen since the clone failed after multiple attempts.]


Answer: Issue: fatal: unable to access 'https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/git/frenaud/freeipa-bootc/freeipa/': SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired
Resolution: Fix the SSL cert problem.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RuntimeError: Cloning into '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-v0djc4ql/freeipa'...

Answer: Traceback is seen since the clone failed after multiple attempts.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [============================================================================
Testsuite summary for avahi 0.8
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 7
# PASS:  6
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0]: [Testuite results with failed test]
=============
[FAIL: domain-test]: [failed test]


Answer: Issue: Build failed because there is fail in testsuite
Resolution: Check the test results - fix either code or test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for avahi 0.8
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 7
# PASS:  6
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

Answer: Testuite results with failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: domain-test

Answer: failed test
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/lexers)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/styles)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/edwvee/exiffix)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/kovidgoyal/imaging)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/zeebo/xxh3)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/exp/constraints)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/exp/rand)']: [Several requested packages were not found in repositories.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/exp/slices)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/image/bmp)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/image/tiff)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/image/webp)']: [Several requested packages were not found in repositories.]
=============
[Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [Certain dependencies were not available for installation.]


Answer: Issue: Multiple dependencies were not available in any of the tracked package repositories. 
Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies are available in package repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/lexers)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/styles)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/edwvee/exiffix)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/kovidgoyal/imaging)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/zeebo/xxh3)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/exp/constraints)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/exp/rand)'

Answer: Several requested packages were not found in repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/exp/slices)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/image/bmp)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/image/tiff)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/image/webp)'

Answer: Several requested packages were not found in repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: Certain dependencies were not available for installation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED: gen/ui/webui/resources/cr_components/page_image_service/eslint.config.mjs 
/usr/bin/python3 ../../ui/webui/resources/tools/eslint_ts.py --in_folder gen/ui/webui/resources/cr_components/page_image_service/preprocessed --out_folder gen/ui/webui/resources/cr_components/page_image_service --config_base ../../../../../../../../ui/webui/resources/tools/eslint_ts.config_base.mjs --tsconfig tsconfig_build_ts.json --in_files browser_proxy.ts
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/chromium-135.0.7049.52/out/Headless/../../ui/webui/resources/tools/eslint_ts.py", line 78, in <module>
    main(sys.argv[1:])
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/chromium-135.0.7049.52/out/Headless/../../ui/webui/resources/tools/eslint_ts.py", line 67, in main
    node.RunNode([
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/chromium-135.0.7049.52/third_party/node/node.py", line 38, in RunNode
    raise RuntimeError('Command \'%s\' failed\n%s' % (' '.join(cmd), err))
RuntimeError: Command '/builddir/build/BUILD/chromium-135.0.7049.52/third_party/node/linux/node-linux-x64/bin/node /builddir/build/BUILD/chromium-135.0.7049.52/third_party/node/node_modules/eslint/bin/eslint --color --quiet --config gen/ui/webui/resources/cr_components/page_image_service/eslint.config.mjs gen/ui/webui/resources/cr_components/page_image_service/preprocessed/browser_proxy.ts' failed
Oops! Something went wrong! :(
ESLint: 9.20.1
TypeError [ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE]: The "path" argument must be of type string. Received undefined
    at new NodeError (node:internal/errors:387:5)
    at validateString (node:internal/validators:162:11)
    at Object.join (node:path:1172:7)
    at file:///builddir/build/BUILD/chromium-135.0.7049.52/out/Headless/gen/ui/webui/resources/cr_components/page_image_service/eslint.config.mjs?mtime=1743548061456:10:26
    at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:193:25)
    at async Promise.all (index 0)
    at async ESMLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:530:24)
    at async importModuleDynamicallyWrapper (node:internal/vm/module:438:15)
    at async loadConfigFile (/builddir/build/BUILD/chromium-135.0.7049.52/third_party/node/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:197:21)
    at async Function.calculateConfigArray (/builddir/build/BUILD/chromium-135.0.7049.52/third_party/node/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.

Answer: the relevant error messages indicate that there's an outdated version of Node.js can indeed cause unexpected errors, especially when dealing with newer features or dependencies in tools like ESLint. The TypeError [ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE] related to path manipulation could arise if the older Node.js version has subtle differences in its path module implementation or if ESLint relies on newer Node.js APIs.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: Transaction test error:
  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.2.13.0-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.23.0-1.fc40.1.noarch

]: [trying to install requirements creates a conflict between two packages]


Answer: Issue: Conflict between dnf 4 data package and libdnf5 package
Resolution: Issue with updating dnf, should be forwarded to dnf package
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Transaction test error:
  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.2.13.0-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.23.0-1.fc40.1.noarch



Answer: trying to install requirements creates a conflict between two packages
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:461:  Failed to read package header from file "/var/cache/libdnf5/build-568ee7a1f6612d3e/packages/libevent-2.1.12-11.fc40.ppc64le.rpm]: [rpm cannot process file libevent-2.1.12-11.fc40.ppc64le.rpm]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because rpm cannot process file libevent-2.1.12-11.fc40.ppc64le.rpm and install package libevent. The package is required to be installed so the build has failed.
Resolution: This is not an easy issue to resolve. There are multiple possible root causes here. You should retry the build to verify it's not an intermittent problem. If it persists, can analyze the problem yourself by getting a ppc64le system and reproducing it there. You should report this problem to the administrators of the build system.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  Failed to read package header from file "/var/cache/libdnf5/build-568ee7a1f6612d3e/packages/libevent-2.1.12-11.fc40.ppc64le.rpm

Answer: rpm cannot process file libevent-2.1.12-11.fc40.ppc64le.rpm
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Processing files: dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.noarch
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/dn]: [This process the %filelist section and it report that files usr/share/bash-completion are present in filelist section, but not present in buildroot.]


Answer: Issue: You entered in %filelist section files and directories paths that are not present in buildroot.
Resolution: Either in %install mkdir this directories and create files or remove this lines from %filelist section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Processing files: dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.noarch
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dnf-4.19.0-1.fc41.aarch64/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/dn

Answer: This process the %filelist section and it report that files usr/share/bash-completion are present in filelist section, but not present in buildroot.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ ./Setup configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --docdir=/usr/share/licenses/jl '--libsubdir=$compiler/lib/$pkgid' '--datasubdir=$pkgid' '--libexecsubdir=$pkgid' --ghc --dynlibdir=/usr/lib64/ghc-9.8.4/lib --global '--ghc-options=-fhide-source-paths  -optc-O2 -optc-fexceptions -optc-g -optc-grecord-gcc-switches -optc-pipe -optc-Wall -optc-Werror=format-security -optc-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -optc-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -optc-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -optc-fstack-protector-strong -optc-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -optc-m64 -optc-march=z13 -optc-mtune=z14 -optc-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -optc-fstack-clash-protection  -optl-Wl,-z,relro -optl-Wl,--as-needed -optl-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -optl-Wl,--build-id=sha1' --enable-library-profiling --enable-shared --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/jl-0.1.0 --global
Configuring jl-0.1.0...
Error: Setup: Encountered missing or private dependencies:
attoparsec-aeson
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.clNIcb (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.clNIcb (%build)]: [Configuration script complains about a missing dependency.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to a missing required build dependency.
Resolution: Add a BuildRequires with the necessary dependency to the package spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ ./Setup configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --docdir=/usr/share/licenses/jl '--libsubdir=$compiler/lib/$pkgid' '--datasubdir=$pkgid' '--libexecsubdir=$pkgid' --ghc --dynlibdir=/usr/lib64/ghc-9.8.4/lib --global '--ghc-options=-fhide-source-paths  -optc-O2 -optc-fexceptions -optc-g -optc-grecord-gcc-switches -optc-pipe -optc-Wall -optc-Werror=format-security -optc-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -optc-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -optc-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -optc-fstack-protector-strong -optc-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -optc-m64 -optc-march=z13 -optc-mtune=z14 -optc-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -optc-fstack-clash-protection  -optl-Wl,-z,relro -optl-Wl,--as-needed -optl-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -optl-Wl,--build-id=sha1' --enable-library-profiling --enable-shared --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/jl-0.1.0 --global
Configuring jl-0.1.0...
Error: Setup: Encountered missing or private dependencies:
attoparsec-aeson
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.clNIcb (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.clNIcb (%build)

Answer: Configuration script complains about a missing dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
/builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:122:3: error: initialization of âgboolean (*)(struct _RemminaSecretPlugin *)â {aka âint (*)(struct _RemminaSecretPlugin *)â} from incompatible pointer type âgboolean (*)(RemminaPlugin *)â {aka âint (*)(struct _RemminaPlugin *)â} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  122 |   remmina_plugin_kwallet_init,
      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Incompatible pointer type error in compiled code.]
=============
[builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:122:3: note: (near initialization for âremmina_plugin_kwallet.initâ)
/builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:123:3: error: initialization of âgboolean (*)(struct _RemminaSecretPlugin *)â {aka âint (*)(struct _RemminaSecretPlugin *)â} from incompatible pointer type âgboolean (*)(RemminaPlugin *)â {aka âint (*)(struct _RemminaPlugin *)â} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  123 |   remmina_plugin_kwallet_is_service_available,
      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:123:3: note: (near initialization for âremmina_plugin_kwallet.is_service_availableâ)
/builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:124:3: error: ]: [Redefinition of existing C pre-processor constant. Which is a bad practice, although not a sign of large problem.]
=============
[builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/python_wrapper/python_wrapper_common.c:78:18: warning: âREASONABLE_LIMIT_FOR_MALLOCâ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
   78 | static const int REASONABLE_LIMIT_FOR_MALLOC = 1024 * 1024;]: [Unused C pre-processor constant.]
=============
[Copr build error: Build failed]: [Final build failure report.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed due to an incompatible pointer type error in compiled code.
Resolution: Ensure presence of compatible pointer types in all compiled code.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

/builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:122:3: error: initialization of âgboolean (*)(struct _RemminaSecretPlugin *)â {aka âint (*)(struct _RemminaSecretPlugin *)â} from incompatible pointer type âgboolean (*)(RemminaPlugin *)â {aka âint (*)(struct _RemminaPlugin *)â} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  122 |   remmina_plugin_kwallet_init,
      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Incompatible pointer type error in compiled code.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:122:3: note: (near initialization for âremmina_plugin_kwallet.initâ)
/builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:123:3: error: initialization of âgboolean (*)(struct _RemminaSecretPlugin *)â {aka âint (*)(struct _RemminaSecretPlugin *)â} from incompatible pointer type âgboolean (*)(RemminaPlugin *)â {aka âint (*)(struct _RemminaPlugin *)â} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  123 |   remmina_plugin_kwallet_is_service_available,
      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:123:3: note: (near initialization for âremmina_plugin_kwallet.is_service_availableâ)
/builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/kwallet/src/kwallet_plugin_main.c:124:3: error: 

Answer: Redefinition of existing C pre-processor constant. Which is a bad practice, although not a sign of large problem.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
builddir/build/BUILD/Remmina-v.1.4.33/plugins/python_wrapper/python_wrapper_common.c:78:18: warning: âREASONABLE_LIMIT_FOR_MALLOCâ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
   78 | static const int REASONABLE_LIMIT_FOR_MALLOC = 1024 * 1024;

Answer: Unused C pre-processor constant.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ninja: Entering directory `out/Release'
ninja: error: '../../../../../../usr/lib64/llvm20/lib/clang/20/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.builtins.a', needed by 'obj/third_party/protobuf/libprotoc_lib.a', missing and no known rule to make it
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UUYcXA (%build)]: [The error messages indicate that ninja cannot found libclang_rt.builtins.a, which ist required to build libprotoc_lib.a]
=============
[+ clang_base_path=/usr/lib64/llvm20
]: [Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because clang_base_path was set to /usr/lib64/llvm20 which is wrong. The  clang base path is set to /usr by default in fedora and epel
Resolution: Edit your specfile and set the clang_base_path to /usr
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ninja: Entering directory `out/Release'
ninja: error: '../../../../../../usr/lib64/llvm20/lib/clang/20/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.builtins.a', needed by 'obj/third_party/protobuf/libprotoc_lib.a', missing and no known rule to make it
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UUYcXA (%build)

Answer: The error messages indicate that ninja cannot found libclang_rt.builtins.a, which ist required to build libprotoc_lib.a
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ clang_base_path=/usr/lib64/llvm20


Answer: Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/gwenview-25.04.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/kf6/kfileitemaction/slideshowfileitemaction.so.4
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/gwenview-25.04.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/kf6/kfileitemaction/slideshowfileitemaction.so.4]: [This is the build error]


Answer: Issue: The build tried to package a file that does not exist. It might be due to a typo in the filename or the file was present in the previous releases but now is removed/renamed.
Resolution: Fix the filename or remove it from the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/gwenview-25.04.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/kf6/kfileitemaction/slideshowfileitemaction.so.4
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/gwenview-25.04.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/kf6/kfileitemaction/slideshowfileitemaction.so.4

Answer: This is the build error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error generating index.html: No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml (RDoc::Error)
]: [The core issue seems to be a missing file: /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml. This file is a template used by RDoc to generate the sidebar toggle element in the documentation.]


Answer: Issue: The error message you've provided indicates a problem with the RDoc gem, a tool used for generating documentation for Ruby projects. Specifically, it's failing to generate the index.html file, which is a crucial part of the documentation.
Resolution: Check for RDoc Bugs: Search online forums or issue trackers for similar problems and potential solutions.

Check if sources contain that file and try to track it down.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error generating index.html: No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml (RDoc::Error)


Answer: The core issue seems to be a missing file: /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-6.8.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/_sidebar_toggle.rhtml. This file is a template used by RDoc to generate the sidebar toggle element in the documentation.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [INFO: Buildroot is handled by package management downloaded with a bootstrap image:
  rpm-4.19.1.1-2.eln136.x86_64
  rpm-sequoia-1.6.0-2.eln134.x86_64
  dnf5-5.2.1.0-1.eln136.x86_64
  dnf5-plugins-5.2.1.0-1.eln136.x86_64
Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-u763d84x/anaconda/anaconda.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 0 minutes 27 seconds]: [Includes the line of the failure and the few lines above which make  clear that the issue are related to the dnf version.
]


Answer: Issue: packit it trying to use dnf-3, as it's probably hardcoded somewhere. However the environment has dnf5 installed.
Resolution: Replace the hardcoded dnf-3 command with newer dnf version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
INFO: Buildroot is handled by package management downloaded with a bootstrap image:
  rpm-4.19.1.1-2.eln136.x86_64
  rpm-sequoia-1.6.0-2.eln134.x86_64
  dnf5-5.2.1.0-1.eln136.x86_64
  dnf5-plugins-5.2.1.0-1.eln136.x86_64
Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-u763d84x/anaconda/anaconda.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 0 minutes 27 seconds

Answer: Includes the line of the failure and the few lines above which make  clear that the issue are related to the dnf version.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.gwenview.appdata.xml
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.gwenview.appdata.xml]: [This is the build error]


Answer: Issue: There is a file that is part of the build, but is not listed among the files to be included in the package/subpackages nor is it excluded using the %exclude macro.
Resolution: Either add the file(s) to the list of files included in the package/subpackages or use the %exclude macro to exclude it from the packaging.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.gwenview.appdata.xml
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.gwenview.appdata.xml

Answer: This is the build error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project maven-compiler-plugin: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:maven-plugin:3.12.1
[ERROR] dependency: org.mockito:mockito-core:jar:4.8.0 (test)]: [A test dependency specified in the POM file could not be resolved by Maven.]


Answer: Issue: A test dependency is missing.
Resolution: If the dependency is really needed for the build, add it to BuildRequires, if available. Otherwise try to remove the usage of the dependency from the project.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project maven-compiler-plugin: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:maven-plugin:3.12.1
[ERROR] dependency: org.mockito:mockito-core:jar:4.8.0 (test)

Answer: A test dependency specified in the POM file could not be resolved by Maven.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/cet.c:102! ]: [Hit the kernel bug at arch/x86/kernel/cet.c:102]


Answer: Issue: This is a kernel bug
Resolution: Need to check the source code  and fix it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/cet.c:102! 

Answer: Hit the kernel bug at arch/x86/kernel/cet.c:102
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ cd ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PBaYH9: line 42: cd: ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3: No such file or directory
]: [Directory `ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3` does not exist.]


Answer: Issue: rpmbuild cannot locate unpacked sources of procdump. It expected directory `ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3` but it's not available.
Resolution: Logs suggest that the version of the software is correct because the archive is named `ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3.tar.gz`.

It seems that the archive structure changed. Inspect the archive content with `tar -tf ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3.tar.gz` and based on the changes that upstream did, update the %prep section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ cd ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PBaYH9: line 42: cd: ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3: No such file or directory


Answer: Directory `ProcDump-for-Linux-3.3` does not exist.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [=========================== short test summary info ============================
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_bodhi.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIRE_...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_bugzilla.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUI...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_health_check.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_R...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_helpers.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIR...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_koschei.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIR...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_orphans.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIR...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_pagure.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIRE...
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 7 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
======================== 2 warnings, 7 errors in 1.97s =========================
py312: exit 2 (2.40 seconds) /builddir/build/BUILD/oraculum-0.2.4> pytest pid=749
  py312: FAIL code 2 (2.40 seconds)
  evaluation failed :( (2.46 seconds]: [Pytest test cases that failed.]


Answer: Issue: The error message indicates that there were seven errors encountered during the execution of the pytest test suite for the Oracleum project. These errors occurred in seven different test files:

- tests/test_packager_dashboard_bodhi.py
- tests/test_packager_dashboard_bugzilla.py
- tests/test_packager_dashboard_health_check.py
- tests/test_packager_dashboard_helpers.py
- tests/test_packager_dashboard_koschei.py
- tests/test_packager_dashboard_orphans.py
- tests/test_packager_dashboard_pagure.py

Each of these errors is specifically related to a ValueError being raised during the execution of the test. The ValueError indicates that there is an issue with the OIDC_REQUIRE_SCOPES environment variable.

As a result of these errors, the entire test suite was interrupted and failed. The test runner reported two warnings and seven errors, and the overall exit code was 2.
Resolution: To fix this issue, you will need to investigate the cause of the ValueErrors and ensure that the OIDC_REQUIRE_SCOPES environment variable is set correctly for each of the tests. The specific steps for fixing this issue will depend on the exact configuration of your testing environment and the code being tested.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=========================== short test summary info ============================
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_bodhi.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIRE_...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_bugzilla.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUI...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_health_check.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_R...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_helpers.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIR...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_koschei.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIR...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_orphans.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIR...
ERROR tests/test_packager_dashboard_pagure.py - ValueError: The 'OIDC_REQUIRE...
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 7 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
======================== 2 warnings, 7 errors in 1.97s =========================
py312: exit 2 (2.40 seconds) /builddir/build/BUILD/oraculum-0.2.4> pytest pid=749
  py312: FAIL code 2 (2.40 seconds)
  evaluation failed :( (2.46 seconds

Answer: Pytest test cases that failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: site-packages]: [Dnf `builddep` command complaints that the `site-packages` package is not available in the build repositories.]


Answer: Issue: Missing BuildRequires in buildroot.
Resolution: Build/provide the`site-packages` package in the Copr repository.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: site-packages

Answer: Dnf `builddep` command complaints that the `site-packages` package is not available in the build repositories.