fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [1373/1764 systemd:dist / rule-syntax-check                                  FAIL]: [test rule-syntax-check failed]
=============
[# looking at rules.d/50-udev-default.rules
Invalid line rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:36: SUBSYSTEM=="ptp", SYSCTL{kernel.osrelease}=="6.1[5-9]*|6.[2-9][0-9]*|[7-9].*|[1-9][0-9].*", MODE="0664"
  clause: SYSCTL{kernel.osrelease}=="6.1[5-9]*|6.[2-9][0-9]*|[7-9].*|[1-9][0-9].*"]: [Test failed in file 50-udev-default.rules on line 36]


Answer: Issue: Build failed during test execution
Resolution: Update the test or code to make it pass.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1373/1764 systemd:dist / rule-syntax-check                                  FAIL

Answer: test rule-syntax-check failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
# looking at rules.d/50-udev-default.rules
Invalid line rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:36: SUBSYSTEM=="ptp", SYSCTL{kernel.osrelease}=="6.1[5-9]*|6.[2-9][0-9]*|[7-9].*|[1-9][0-9].*", MODE="0664"
  clause: SYSCTL{kernel.osrelease}=="6.1[5-9]*|6.[2-9][0-9]*|[7-9].*|[1-9][0-9].*"

Answer: Test failed in file 50-udev-default.rules on line 36
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/systemd/system/polkit.service
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/systemd/system/polkit.service]: [Error reported during packaging phase.]


Answer: Issue: A file installed during build process is not packaged properly in %files section of the specfile.
Resolution: Add the file in %files section or remove the file during %build phase if the file is not needed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/systemd/system/polkit.service
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/systemd/system/polkit.service

Answer: Error reported during packaging phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: Setup: Encountered missing or private dependencies:
attoparsec-aeson]: [List of missing dependencies needed for the build of a Haskell package.]


Answer: Issue: One of the build dependencies is missing in the buildroot.
Resolution: List all necessary build dependencies in the specfile.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Setup: Encountered missing or private dependencies:
attoparsec-aeson

Answer: List of missing dependencies needed for the build of a Haskell package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ GO111MODULE=on
+ go build -buildmode pie -compiler gc '-tags=rpm_crashtraceback ' -a -v -x -ldflags '-X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.buildInfo=1746057600          -X "github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.buildOrigin=Fedora Project"          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/config._installPrefix=/usr          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/config._etcDir=/etc          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/pkg/systemd/quadlet._binDir=/usr/bin -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.gitCommit=3c4cf521428ce11906976ddd08a5a6e8626cd50e  -B 0xaf886d7f1406eb8a7edbaa1430c6f85f2466fd2b -compressdwarf=false -linkmode=external -extldflags '\''-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed   -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld-errors -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes  '\''' -o bin/rootlessport ./cmd/rootlessport
WORK=/tmp/go-build588738666
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.3 (running go 1.23.1; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ktwIB3 (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ktwIB3 (%build)
Child return code was: 1]: [Information about required and current version of go binary.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the required version of go binary, which provides golang package, is not installed.
Resolution: Upgrade a golang package in fedora to the version which satisfies the build requirements or change the build dependencies to meet the available version of golang package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ GO111MODULE=on
+ go build -buildmode pie -compiler gc '-tags=rpm_crashtraceback ' -a -v -x -ldflags '-X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.buildInfo=1746057600          -X "github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.buildOrigin=Fedora Project"          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/config._installPrefix=/usr          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/config._etcDir=/etc          -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/pkg/systemd/quadlet._binDir=/usr/bin -X github.com/containers/podman/v5/libpod/define.gitCommit=3c4cf521428ce11906976ddd08a5a6e8626cd50e  -B 0xaf886d7f1406eb8a7edbaa1430c6f85f2466fd2b -compressdwarf=false -linkmode=external -extldflags '\''-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed   -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld-errors -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes  '\''' -o bin/rootlessport ./cmd/rootlessport
WORK=/tmp/go-build588738666
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.3 (running go 1.23.1; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ktwIB3 (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ktwIB3 (%build)
Child return code was: 1

Answer: Information about required and current version of go binary.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .uthash --fuzz=0
patching file configure.ac
Hunk #1 FAILED at 162.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file configure.ac.rej
patching file src/Makefile.am
patching file src/library/rpm-backend.c
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GDdFRG (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GDdFRG (%prep)

RPM build errors:]: [It contains bug.]


Answer: Issue: Patching failed.
Resolution: Check why patch weren't applied and do it again.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .uthash --fuzz=0
patching file configure.ac
Hunk #1 FAILED at 162.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file configure.ac.rej
patching file src/Makefile.am
patching file src/library/rpm-backend.c
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GDdFRG (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GDdFRG (%prep)

RPM build errors:

Answer: It contains bug.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [The error type.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'poetry'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-admin'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-oidc >= 2.0.0'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-xml-rpc'
No matching package to install: 'python3-mrtparse'
No matching package to install: 'python3-sqlalchemy-helpers']: [Missing dependencies]


Answer: Issue: There are unpackaged dependencies.
Resolution: You need to package the dependencies first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: The error type.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'poetry'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-admin'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-oidc >= 2.0.0'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-xml-rpc'
No matching package to install: 'python3-mrtparse'
No matching package to install: 'python3-sqlalchemy-helpers'

Answer: Missing dependencies
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[FAILED] zlib-1.2.11-40.el9.x86_64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success
]: [failed to install the package]
=============
[  zlib-1.2.11-40.el9.x86_64: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success
]: [package that wasn't successfully installed and reason why it couldn't be installed]
=============
[[MIRROR] zlib-1.2.11-40.el9.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel9/9/x86_64/baseos/os/Packages/z/zlib-1.2.11-40.el9.x86_64.rpm (IP: 23.13.176.251)
]: [received status code from the repository during package download]


Answer: Issue: it was not possible to install all the required packages in the environment
Resolution: retry (possibly just a flake), or report the issue to the maintainer of the build system (e.g., Copr team, Koji team, etc.)
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[FAILED] zlib-1.2.11-40.el9.x86_64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success


Answer: failed to install the package
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  zlib-1.2.11-40.el9.x86_64: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success


Answer: package that wasn't successfully installed and reason why it couldn't be installed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[MIRROR] zlib-1.2.11-40.el9.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel9/9/x86_64/baseos/os/Packages/z/zlib-1.2.11-40.el9.x86_64.rpm (IP: 23.13.176.251)


Answer: received status code from the repository during package download
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
git-curl-compat.h:3:10: fatal error: curl/curl.h: No such file or directory
    3 | #include <curl/curl.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
make: *** [Makefile:2808: remote-curl.o] Error 1
cc -o http-push.o -c -MF ./.depend/http-push.o.d -MQ http-push.o -MMD -MP    -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer   -I. -DHAVE_SYSINFO -DGIT_HOST_CPU="\"x86_64\"" -DUSE_LIBPCRE2 -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H  -DSUPPORTS_SIMPLE_IPC -DSHA1_DC -DSHA1DC_NO_STANDARD_INCLUDES -DSHA1DC_INIT_SAFE_HASH_DEFAULT=0 -DSHA1DC_CUSTOM_INCLUDE_SHA1_C="\"git-compat-util.h\"" -DSHA1DC_CUSTOM_INCLUDE_UBC_CHECK_C="\"git-compat-util.h\"" -DSHA256_BLK  -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DHAVE_DEV_TTY -DHAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME -DHAVE_CLOCK_MONOTONIC -DHAVE_SYNC_FILE_RANGE -DHAVE_GETDELIM '-DPROCFS_EXECUTABLE_PATH="/proc/self/exe"' -DFREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES -DNO_STRLCPY -DSHELL_PATH='"/bin/sh"'  http-push.c
In file included from http-push.c:10:
http.h:8:10: fatal error: curl/curl.h: No such file or directory
    8 | #include <curl/curl.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
make: *** [Makefile:2808: http-push.o] Error 1
cc -o http-fetch.o -c -MF ./.depend/http-fetch.o.d -MQ http-fetch.o -MMD -MP    -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer   -I. -DHAVE_SYSINFO -DGIT_HOST_CPU="\"x86_64\"" -DUSE_LIBPCRE2 -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H  -DSUPPORTS_SIMPLE_IPC -DSHA1_DC -DSHA1DC_NO_STANDARD_INCLUDES -DSHA1DC_INIT_SAFE_HASH_DEFAULT=0 -DSHA1DC_CUSTOM_INCLUDE_SHA1_C="\"git-compat-util.h\"" -DSHA1DC_CUSTOM_INCLUDE_UBC_CHECK_C="\"git-compat-util.h\"" -DSHA256_BLK  -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DHAVE_DEV_TTY -DHAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME -DHAVE_CLOCK_MONOTONIC -DHAVE_SYNC_FILE_RANGE -DHAVE_GETDELIM '-DPROCFS_EXECUTABLE_PATH="/proc/self/exe"' -DFREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES -DNO_STRLCPY -DSHELL_PATH='"/bin/sh"'  http-fetch.c
In file included from http-fetch.c:7:
http.h:8:10: fatal error: curl/curl.h: No such file or directory
    8 | #include <curl/curl.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
make: *** [Makefile:2808: http-fetch.o] Error 1

Answer: Compilation failure description
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/libsbig-2.1.3.git-build/BUILDROOT/lib/firmware/*]: [The build error.]
=============
[Processing files: libsbig-2.1.3.git-20250522073953.fc42.aarch64]: [Name of the processed subpackage.]


Answer: Issue: The %files section of given subpackage contains paths to files not existing in the buildroot.
Resolution: Either remove the problematic line from the %files section of given subpackage, or make sure that the respective files are actually installed to the buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/libsbig-2.1.3.git-build/BUILDROOT/lib/firmware/*

Answer: The build error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Processing files: libsbig-2.1.3.git-20250522073953.fc42.aarch64

Answer: Name of the processed subpackage.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'fmt-devel']: [Requested package was not found.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20)']: [Requested package was not found.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20poly1305)']: [Requested package was not found.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/curve25519)']: [Requested package was not found by the package manager.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/hkdf)']: [Requested package was not found by the package manager.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/xts)']: [Requested package was not found by the package manager.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'gtest-devel']: [Requested package was not found by the package manager.]
=============
[Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [Package manager error, indicating that not all packages required for the build could be retrieved.]
=============
[ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/android-tools-35.0.2-2.el9.src.rpm) Config(centos-stream-9-aarch64) 0 minutes 25 seconds]: [Build for configuration `centos-stream-9-aarch64` failed after 25  seconds.]
=============
[Copr build error: Build failed]: [Error indicating general build failure.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed since several required packages couldn't be found. 
Resolution: All dependencies must be available at build time. This includes packages which are supposed to be retrieved from external repositories using package manager.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'fmt-devel'

Answer: Requested package was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20)'

Answer: Requested package was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20poly1305)'

Answer: Requested package was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/curve25519)'

Answer: Requested package was not found by the package manager.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/hkdf)'

Answer: Requested package was not found by the package manager.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'golang(golang.org/x/crypto/xts)'

Answer: Requested package was not found by the package manager.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'gtest-devel'

Answer: Requested package was not found by the package manager.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: Package manager error, indicating that not all packages required for the build could be retrieved.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/android-tools-35.0.2-2.el9.src.rpm) Config(centos-stream-9-aarch64) 0 minutes 25 seconds

Answer: Build for configuration `centos-stream-9-aarch64` failed after 25  seconds.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: Error indicating general build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages]: [missing dependency]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages]: [missing dependency]


Answer: Issue: There's a missing dependency `python3-pytest-twisted` that is needed for the build / tests
Resolution: Package the required dependency
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages

Answer: missing dependency
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
user.c:259:27: error: initialization of ‘const char *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  259 |                         { 'i', dec2str(client->idx), NULL },
      |                           ^~~
user.c:259:27: note: (near initialization for ‘exp_table[0].key’)
user.c:264:51: error: passing argument 3 of ‘var_expand’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  264 |                 if (var_expand(str, conf.mailbox, exp_table, &error) != 1) {
      |                                                   ^~~~~~~~~
      |                                                   |
      |                                                   struct var_expand_table *
In file included from user.c:15:
/usr/include/dovecot/var-expand.h:88:81: note: expected ‘const struct var_expand_params *’ but argument is of type ‘struct var_expand_table *’
   88 | int var_expand(string_t *dest, const char *str, const struct var_expand_params *params,
      |                                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~

Answer: shows unexpected type of arguments
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
profile.c:626:19: error: initialization of ‘const char *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  626 |                 { 'n', num, NULL },
      |                   ^~~
profile.c:626:19: note: (near initialization for ‘tab[0].key’)
profile.c:637:73: error: passing argument 3 of ‘var_expand’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  637 |                 if (var_expand(username, user_profile->username_format, tab,
      |                                                                         ^~~
      |                                                                         |
      |                                                                         struct var_expand_table *
In file included from profile.c:7:
/usr/include/dovecot/var-expand.h:88:81: note: expected ‘const struct var_expand_params *’ but argument is of type ‘struct var_expand_table *’
   88 | int var_expand(string_t *dest, const char *str, const struct var_expand_params *params,
      |                                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
make[2]: *** [Makefile:824: imaptest-profile.o] Error 1
client.c: In function ‘client_wait_connect’:
client.c:153:69: error: passing argument 3 of ‘io_stream_create_ssl_client’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  153 |                 if (io_stream_create_ssl_client(ssl_ctx, conf.host, &conf.ssl_set, 0,
      |                                                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                                     |
      |                                                                     struct ssl_iostream_settings *
In file included from client.c:9:
/usr/include/dovecot/iostream-ssl.h:107:47: note: expected ‘struct event *’ but argument is of type ‘struct ssl_iostream_settings *’
  107 |                                 struct event *event_parent,
      |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: shows unexpected type of arguments
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
test-parser.c:535:39: error: macro ‘str_begins’ requires 3 arguments, but only 2 given
  535 |         if (str_begins(line, "!ifenv ") || str_begins(line, "!ifnenv ")) {
      |                                       ^
In file included from /usr/include/dovecot/lib.h:61,
                 from test-parser.c:3:
/usr/include/dovecot/strfuncs.h:119:10: note: macro ‘str_begins’ defined here
  119 | # define str_begins(h, n, suffix_r) \
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~
test-parser.c:535:13: warning: the address of ‘str_begins’ will always evaluate as ‘true’ [-Waddress]
  535 |         if (str_begins(line, "!ifenv ") || str_begins(line, "!ifnenv ")) {
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~
test-parser.c:535:71: error: macro ‘str_begins’ requires 3 arguments, but only 2 given
  535 |         if (str_begins(line, "!ifenv ") || str_begins(line, "!ifnenv ")) {
      |                                                                       ^
/usr/include/dovecot/strfuncs.h:119:10: note: macro ‘str_begins’ defined here
  119 | # define str_begins(h, n, suffix_r) \
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~
test-parser.c:535:41: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘str_begins’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
  535 |         if (str_begins(line, "!ifenv ") || str_begins(line, "!ifnenv ")) {
      |                                         ^~
/usr/include/dovecot/strfuncs.h:92:6: note: ‘str_begins’ declared here
   92 | bool str_begins(const char *haystack, const char *needle,
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~
test-parser.c:539:48: error: macro ‘str_begins’ requires 3 arguments, but only 2 given
  539 |                 if (str_begins(line, "!ifnenv "))
      |                                                ^
/usr/include/dovecot/strfuncs.h:119:10: note: macro ‘str_begins’ defined here
  119 | # define str_begins(h, n, suffix_r) \
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~
test-parser.c:539:21: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘str_begins’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
  539 |                 if (str_begins(line, "!ifnenv "))
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/dovecot/strfuncs.h:92:6: note: ‘str_begins’ declared here
   92 | bool str_begins(const char *haystack, const char *needle,
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~
test-parser.c:584:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘settings_get_time_msecs’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  584 |                         if (settings_get_time_msecs(line+7, &group->sleep_msecs, &error) < 0) {
      |                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: shows unexpected type of arguments
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
plugins: asyncio-0.24.0, mock-3.14.0

Answer: This snippet shows the plugins used by pytest in the test run. It can help determining where the bug comes from.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tests/coordinator/test_assignors.py EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE [  2%]

Answer: This snippet shows the row of capital Es, indicating that all of the tests errored.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
__________________ ERROR at setup of test_assignor_roundrobin __________________

    @pytest.fixture(scope="session", autouse=True)
    def event_loop_policy() -> AbstractEventLoopPolicy:
        """Return an instance of the policy used to create asyncio event loops."""
>       return asyncio.get_event_loop_policy()

/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:1056: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
/usr/lib64/python3.14/asyncio/events.py:806: in get_event_loop_policy
    warnings._deprecated('asyncio.get_event_loop_policy', remove=(3, 16))
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

name = 'asyncio.get_event_loop_policy'
message = '{name!r} is deprecated and slated for removal in Python {remove}'

    def _deprecated(name, message=_DEPRECATED_MSG, *, remove, _version=sys.version_info):
        """Warn that *name* is deprecated or should be removed.
    
        RuntimeError is raised if *remove* specifies a major/minor tuple older than
        the current Python version or the same version but past the alpha.
    
        The *message* argument is formatted with *name* and *remove* as a Python
        version tuple (e.g. (3, 11)).
    
        """
        remove_formatted = f"{remove[0]}.{remove[1]}"
        if (_version[:2] > remove) or (_version[:2] == remove and _version[3] != "alpha"):
            msg = f"{name!r} was slated for removal after Python {remove_formatted} alpha"
            raise RuntimeError(msg)
        else:
            msg = message.format(name=name, remove=remove_formatted)
>           warn(msg, DeprecationWarning, stacklevel=3)
E           DeprecationWarning: 'asyncio.get_event_loop_policy' is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.16

/usr/lib64/python3.14/warnings.py:677: DeprecationWarning

Answer: The setup of the test failed. asyncio.get_event_loop_policy() is deprecated in Python and will be removed in version 3.16. This issues a DeprecationWarning which is treated as error and invalidates the test run.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ %check_patches
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gm0hDp: line 56: fg: no job control
]: [macro not found]


Answer: Issue: rpmbuild does not know the macro used
Resolution: Check for typos and define specified macro
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ %check_patches
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gm0hDp: line 56: fg: no job control


Answer: macro not found
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1]: [Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.]
=============
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1]: [Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.]
=============
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1]: [Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.]
=============
[
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1]: [Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.]
=============
[
Copr build error: Build fail]: [A final message from the copr build service about halting an attempt to complete the build.]


Answer: Issue: Build time dependencies necessary to do the build aren't present in the repositories available to the builder.
Resolution: Handle the chained build in the correct order by building the missing dependencies before attempting to build the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: llvm-cmake-utils = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-devel = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-googletest = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-static = 18.1.1
No match for argument: llvm-test = 18.1

Answer: Contains a message about unresolvable dependencies necessary to start the build process.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Copr build error: Build fail

Answer: A final message from the copr build service about halting an attempt to complete the build.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Running test test_client_express (starting at 2025-03-31 22:11:15-04:00) ... 
-----------------------------------------------
Running express client test
Running express test suite
Cloning into '/var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express'...
warning: Could not find remote branch 5.1.0 to clone.
fatal: Remote branch 5.1.0 not found in upstream origin
test/test-lib-nodejs.sh: line 81: pushd: /var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express: No such file or directory
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)]: [Running test test_client_express (starting at 2025-03-31 22:11:15-04:00) ... 
-----------------------------------------------
Running express client test
Running express test suite
Cloning into '/var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express'...
warning: Could not find remote branch 5.1.0 to clone.
fatal: Remote branch 5.1.0 not found in upstream origin
test/test-lib-nodejs.sh: line 81: pushd: /var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express: No such file or directory
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)]


Answer: Issue: The build of client_express failed for reason, that remote branch does not exit.
Resolution: Use the appropriate branch to fix this issue. See in the upstream repository which branch is active
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Running test test_client_express (starting at 2025-03-31 22:11:15-04:00) ... 
-----------------------------------------------
Running express client test
Running express test suite
Cloning into '/var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express'...
warning: Could not find remote branch 5.1.0 to clone.
fatal: Remote branch 5.1.0 not found in upstream origin
test/test-lib-nodejs.sh: line 81: pushd: /var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express: No such file or directory
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)

Answer: Running test test_client_express (starting at 2025-03-31 22:11:15-04:00) ... 
-----------------------------------------------
Running express client test
Running express test suite
Cloning into '/var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express'...
warning: Could not find remote branch 5.1.0 to clone.
fatal: Remote branch 5.1.0 not found in upstream origin
test/test-lib-nodejs.sh: line 81: pushd: /var/tmp/daily_scl_tests/rhel10-test-upstream/plans/nightly-container-rhel10/data/s2i-nodejs-container/test/express: No such file or directory
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/at-3.2.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/atrun
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/at-3.2.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/atd]: [This part of code shows the error which caused the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: Because during the build, files shown in the snippet were not found. This error message has came from the unification of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin directories in Fedora 42.
Resolution: Verify the spec file and ensure to only use %{_bindir} macro to specify the path to /usr/bin.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/at-3.2.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/atrun
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/at-3.2.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/atd

Answer: This part of code shows the error which caused the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ninja: error: '../../deps/openssl/nodejs-openssl.cnf', needed by 'obj/deps/openssl/openssl.cnf', missing and no known rule to make it]: [Error: describing that there is openssl cnf present that requires a nodejs-openssl.cnf which isn't present
]
=============
[--shared-openssl]: [Package is using openssl from fedora and has had the local dependency stripped]


Answer: Issue: OpenSSL has been stripped from dependencies in order to use Openssl present in fedora packages, but it's config was not removed from node.gyp and was generated during the build, which made the build process read it and try to access file in /deps/ folder which have been previously deleted. 
Resolution: If you intend to utilize system openssl instance, make sure to remove all config concerning openssl from node.gyp.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ninja: error: '../../deps/openssl/nodejs-openssl.cnf', needed by 'obj/deps/openssl/openssl.cnf', missing and no known rule to make it

Answer: Error: describing that there is openssl cnf present that requires a nodejs-openssl.cnf which isn't present
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
--shared-openssl

Answer: Package is using openssl from fedora and has had the local dependency stripped
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'extra-cmake-modules >= 5.248.0']: [DNF reports that `extra-cmake-modules` with version >= 5.248.0 couldn't be found.]


Answer: Issue: The extra-cmake-modules don't exist in the build repository, or exists in an incompatible version.
Resolution: Fix the dependency specification, or provide a newer extra-cmake-modules package in the build repository.