fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(az-cvm-vtpm/default) >= 0.7.1 with crate(az-cvm-vtpm/default) < 0.8.0~)
]: [The issue is that your build environment doesn't have a suitable version of this crate that meets the specified version constraints.]
=============
[Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(az-cvm-vtpm/verifier) >= 0.7.1 with crate(az-cvm-vtpm/verifier) < 0.8.0~)
]: [The version range >= 0.7.1 with < 0.8.0~ means that you need a version greater than or equal to 0.7.1 but strictly less than 0.8.0.]
=============
[Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(base64-url/default) >= 3.0.0 with crate(base64-url/default) < 4.0.0~)
]: [Again, the issue is that a suitable version of this crate isn't available in your RPM build environment.]


Answer: Issue: When you encounter errors like these in Rust, it typically indicates that the specified crates (or libraries) and their specific version ranges are not available in your RPM build environment.
Resolution: You need to build required packages first as RPMs and make them available to your current build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(az-cvm-vtpm/default) >= 0.7.1 with crate(az-cvm-vtpm/default) < 0.8.0~)


Answer: The issue is that your build environment doesn't have a suitable version of this crate that meets the specified version constraints.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(az-cvm-vtpm/verifier) >= 0.7.1 with crate(az-cvm-vtpm/verifier) < 0.8.0~)


Answer: The version range >= 0.7.1 with < 0.8.0~ means that you need a version greater than or equal to 0.7.1 but strictly less than 0.8.0.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(base64-url/default) >= 3.0.0 with crate(base64-url/default) < 4.0.0~)


Answer: Again, the issue is that a suitable version of this crate isn't available in your RPM build environment.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch]: [This line highlights the reason why has the build failed. Build dependencies cannot be satisfied.]


Answer: Issue: Package clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115 requires clang in version greater than "13.0.0". Repositories don't provide clang in that version and hence the build failed.
Resolution: Provide clang in version 13 or relax the requirements so they are not so strict.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch

Answer: This line highlights the reason why has the build failed. Build dependencies cannot be satisfied.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Additional repo http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org 226 MB/s |  52 MB     00:]: [This snippet indicates that a koji buildroot is used, on top of "distributed" fedora packages.]
=============
[
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch':
  - Status code: 404 for https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/s390x/repodata/7ea5d60a860c857599e3ea6a936272eae2e76e7e0ef6a3d71948120ebc2c93da-primary.xml.gz (IP: 38.145.60.21)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch': Yum repo downloading error: Downloading error(s): repodata/7ea5d60a860c857599e3ea6a936272eae2e76e7e0ef6a3d71948120ebc2c93da-primary.xml.gz - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without succes]: [And here we see that the Koji buildroot repository had some (perhaps temporary) problems when the builder machine attempted to download metadata files.

This actually shouldn't happen.  See https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11870 for more info.]


Answer: Issue: Because the builder failed to download Koji buildroot metadata.
Resolution: Restart the build after several minutes; the remote Koji buildroot repository typically gets fixed itself automatically.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Additional repo http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org 226 MB/s |  52 MB     00:

Answer: This snippet indicates that a koji buildroot is used, on top of "distributed" fedora packages.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch':
  - Status code: 404 for https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/s390x/repodata/7ea5d60a860c857599e3ea6a936272eae2e76e7e0ef6a3d71948120ebc2c93da-primary.xml.gz (IP: 38.145.60.21)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'http_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_org_repos_rawhide_latest_basearch': Yum repo downloading error: Downloading error(s): repodata/7ea5d60a860c857599e3ea6a936272eae2e76e7e0ef6a3d71948120ebc2c93da-primary.xml.gz - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without succes

Answer: And here we see that the Koji buildroot repository had some (perhaps temporary) problems when the builder machine attempted to download metadata files.

This actually shouldn't happen.  See https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11870 for more info.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'python3dist(mkdocs) >= 1']: [Missing dependency]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pyparsing) >= 3'
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pyyaml-env-tag)']: [Missing dependencies]


Answer: Issue: Missing dependency
Resolution: Include these dependencies in the buildroot
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(mkdocs) >= 1'

Answer: Missing dependency
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pyparsing) >= 3'
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pyyaml-env-tag)'

Answer: Missing dependencies
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Check import: django_logic
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 171, in <module>
    main()
    ~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 167, in main
    import_modules(modules)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 100, in import_modules
    importlib.import_module(module)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/importlib/__init__.py", line 88, in import_module
    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1387, in _gcd_import
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1360, in _find_and_load
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1331, in _find_and_load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 935, in _load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 1026, in exec_module
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 488, in _call_with_frames_removed
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-django-logic-0.1.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/django_logic/__init__.py", line 1, in <module>
    from .commands import Permissions, Conditions, SideEffects, Callbacks
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-django-logic-0.1.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/django_logic/commands.py", line 2, in <module>
    from django_logic.logger import get_logger
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-django-logic-0.1.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/django_logic/logger.py", line 4, in <module>
    from django.conf import settings
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'django']: [Module `django` couldn't be imported because it isn't present in any of the installed libraries.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed due to attempt to import module `django` which isn't installed on the system. It is possible that the package has unstated dependency on provider of `django` module. Or that it wasn't installed correctly.
Resolution: Ensure that all required packages are listed in the appropriate section of the SPEC file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Check import: django_logic
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 171, in <module>
    main()
    ~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 167, in main
    import_modules(modules)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 100, in import_modules
    importlib.import_module(module)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/importlib/__init__.py", line 88, in import_module
    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1387, in _gcd_import
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1360, in _find_and_load
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1331, in _find_and_load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 935, in _load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 1026, in exec_module
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 488, in _call_with_frames_removed
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-django-logic-0.1.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/django_logic/__init__.py", line 1, in <module>
    from .commands import Permissions, Conditions, SideEffects, Callbacks
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-django-logic-0.1.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/django_logic/commands.py", line 2, in <module>
    from django_logic.logger import get_logger
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-django-logic-0.1.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/django_logic/logger.py", line 4, in <module>
    from django.conf import settings
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'django'

Answer: Module `django` couldn't be imported because it isn't present in any of the installed libraries.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
******************** TEST 'MLIR :: Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 2
rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp || true
# executed command: rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp
# RUN: at line 3
/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/mlir-opt /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/mlir/test/Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir -mlir-print-ir-tree-dir=/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp    -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(cse,canonicalize)))'    -mlir-print-ir-before=cse
# executed command: /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/mlir-opt /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/mlir/test/Pass/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir -mlir-print-ir-tree-dir=/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-21.0.0_pre20250610.g17999f01bbcda4-build/llvm-project-17999f01bbcda4ccdf5146cbecc562c60b2ca86e/llvm/redhat-linux-build/tools/mlir/test/Pass/Output/ir-printing-file-tree.mlir.tmp '-pass-pipeline=builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(cse,canonicalize)))' -mlir-print-ir-before=cse
# .---command stderr------------
# | mlir-opt: for the --mlir-print-ir-before option: Cannot find option named 'cse'!
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 1

--


Answer: Here you see the test results for "%s" that were failing and their standard and error output
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Running test run_upgrade_test (starting at 2024-07-04 01:58:51-04:00) ... 
-----------------------------------------------
Trying to pull registry.redhat.io/rhel8/postgresql-12:latest...
Getting image source signatures
Checking if image destination supports signatures
Copying blob sha256:de43eda594e9a5e377b5200427c511112f80d19df37a6bdcca7069500aab5d24
Copying blob sha256:8694db102e5bd27fa30106f87d5a0f0c5ccccac0e5cc38ba56080d7559377096
Copying blob sha256:7027f4e4058bde8aaa497e47562e962c293039ba16f5fbfd07ff43a0d1dbd5a2
Copying config sha256:9a699ca856e903238846c373ad5a0e3eac4093f3ec7878037cc645562d51f919
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
Trying to pull registry.redhat.io/rhel8/postgresql-12:latest...
Getting image source signatures
Checking if image destination supports signatures
Copying blob sha256:de43eda594e9a5e377b5200427c511112f80d19df37a6bdcca7069500aab5d24
Copying blob sha256:8694db102e5bd27fa30106f87d5a0f0c5ccccac0e5cc38ba56080d7559377096
Copying blob sha256:7027f4e4058bde8aaa497e47562e962c293039ba16f5fbfd07ff43a0d1dbd5a2
Copying config sha256:9a699ca856e903238846c373ad5a0e3eac4093f3ec7878037cc645562d51f919
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
9a699ca856e903238846c373ad5a0e3eac4093f3ec7878037cc645562d51f919
 * Initializing datadir with 12:remote PostgreSQL
Trying to pull registry.redhat.io/rhel8/postgresql-12:latest...
Getting image source signatures
Checking if image destination supports signatures
Copying blob sha256:de43eda594e9a5e377b5200427c511112f80d19df37a6bdcca7069500aab5d24
Copying blob sha256:8694db102e5bd27fa30106f87d5a0f0c5ccccac0e5cc38ba56080d7559377096
Copying blob sha256:7027f4e4058bde8aaa497e47562e962c293039ba16f5fbfd07ff43a0d1dbd5a2
Copying config sha256:9a699ca856e903238846c373ad5a0e3eac4093f3ec7878037cc645562d51f919
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
 * Running upgrade 'hardlink/empty'
 * Upgrading to 13:local
psql: error: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
	Is the server running locally and accepting
	connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"?
ERROR: Unexpected output '']: [Function run_pgupgrade does not start PSQL server properly. ]


Answer: Issue: The upgrade failed because there was an error with parsing /etc/os_version properly.
Resolution: To fix this issue please check file https://github.com/sclorg/postgresql-container/blob/master/src/root/usr/share/container-scripts/postgresql/common.sh and 'run_pgupgrade' function
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Running test run_upgrade_test (starting at 2024-07-04 01:58:51-04:00) ... 
-----------------------------------------------
Trying to pull registry.redhat.io/rhel8/postgresql-12:latest...
Getting image source signatures
Checking if image destination supports signatures
Copying blob sha256:de43eda594e9a5e377b5200427c511112f80d19df37a6bdcca7069500aab5d24
Copying blob sha256:8694db102e5bd27fa30106f87d5a0f0c5ccccac0e5cc38ba56080d7559377096
Copying blob sha256:7027f4e4058bde8aaa497e47562e962c293039ba16f5fbfd07ff43a0d1dbd5a2
Copying config sha256:9a699ca856e903238846c373ad5a0e3eac4093f3ec7878037cc645562d51f919
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
Trying to pull registry.redhat.io/rhel8/postgresql-12:latest...
Getting image source signatures
Checking if image destination supports signatures
Copying blob sha256:de43eda594e9a5e377b5200427c511112f80d19df37a6bdcca7069500aab5d24
Copying blob sha256:8694db102e5bd27fa30106f87d5a0f0c5ccccac0e5cc38ba56080d7559377096
Copying blob sha256:7027f4e4058bde8aaa497e47562e962c293039ba16f5fbfd07ff43a0d1dbd5a2
Copying config sha256:9a699ca856e903238846c373ad5a0e3eac4093f3ec7878037cc645562d51f919
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
9a699ca856e903238846c373ad5a0e3eac4093f3ec7878037cc645562d51f919
 * Initializing datadir with 12:remote PostgreSQL
Trying to pull registry.redhat.io/rhel8/postgresql-12:latest...
Getting image source signatures
Checking if image destination supports signatures
Copying blob sha256:de43eda594e9a5e377b5200427c511112f80d19df37a6bdcca7069500aab5d24
Copying blob sha256:8694db102e5bd27fa30106f87d5a0f0c5ccccac0e5cc38ba56080d7559377096
Copying blob sha256:7027f4e4058bde8aaa497e47562e962c293039ba16f5fbfd07ff43a0d1dbd5a2
Copying config sha256:9a699ca856e903238846c373ad5a0e3eac4093f3ec7878037cc645562d51f919
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
 * Running upgrade 'hardlink/empty'
 * Upgrading to 13:local
psql: error: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
	Is the server running locally and accepting
	connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432"?
ERROR: Unexpected output ''

Answer: Function run_pgupgrade does not start PSQL server properly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Using katex 0.8.0
Using kramdown-math-katex 1.0.1
Using webrick 1.7.0
Bundle complete! 12 Gemfile dependencies, 48 gems now installed.
Bundled gems are installed into `./vendor/bundle`
Building the website using Jekyll...
=== Development build (preview-atlasklimatickezmeny) ===
Configuration file: /home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core/_config.yml
            Source: /home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core
       Destination: /home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core/_site
 Incremental build: disabled. Enable with --incremental
      Generating... 
                  * Getting git metadata ... 
[31m  Liquid Exception: Invalid syntax for include tag: id-prefix="collapse-atlas" counter=3 title="### ÄtenÃ­ s porozumÄnÃ­m: zÃ¡sobÃ¡rna otÃ¡zek pro prÃ¡ci v hodinÃ¡ch " content=" Prakticky jakÃ©koliv texty z oblasti pÅÃ­rodnÃ­ch vÄd se nabÃ­zejÃ­ jako skvÄlÃ½ materiÃ¡l pro ÄtenÃ­ s porozumÄnÃ­m, kdy si studenti kladou otÃ¡zky, kterÃ© je vedou k hlubÅ¡Ã­mu zamyÅ¡lenÃ­ nad prezentovanÃ½mi informacemi. **ZÃ¡kladnÃ­ forma je jednoduchÃ¡:** v menÅ¡Ã­ch skupinÃ¡ch (nebo spoleÄnÄ v celÃ© tÅÃ­dÄ) nechÃ¡te studenty pÅeÄÃ­st danÃ½ materiÃ¡l (tÅeba graf rÅ¯stu svÄtovÃ© teplotnÃ­ anomÃ¡lie s doprovodnÃ½m textem) a pak poklÃ¡dÃ¡te otÃ¡zky, na kterÃ© by mÄla bÃ½t odpovÄÄ v rÃ¡mci textu. U jednoduÅ¡Å¡Ã­ch otÃ¡zek se studenti snadno shodnou, sloÅ¾itÄjÅ¡Ã­ otÃ¡zky mohou otevÃ­rat diskusi - a to, co pak jako uÄitel potÅebujete je vytvÃ¡Ået pro

Answer: There is an invalid syntax in the include tag starting with "id-prefix="collapse-atlas" coun..."
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.7.0/gems/jekyll-4.2.0/lib/jekyll/tags/include.rb:70:in `validate_params': Invalid syntax for include tag: (ArgumentError)

Answer: It shows that the error was raised in the "include" function.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
iskusi vhodnÃ© prostÅedÃ­. **ZÃ¡sobÃ¡rna otÃ¡zek**, kterÃ© zde nabÃ­zÃ­me, je navrÅ¾ena tak, aby povzbuzovala analytickÃ© myÅ¡lenÃ­, podnÄcovala ke ÄtenÃ­ grafÅ¯ a pÅispÃ­valy k formovÃ¡nÃ­ informovanÃ½ch nÃ¡zorÅ¯ a postojÅ¯ k otÃ¡zkÃ¡m klimatickÃ© zmÄny. <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pFunrt9mDZFZ7xIvRUGKDM-hHI-GJjPwsEqVBLChQDI/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank" class="btn btn-secondary"><i class="fas fa-fw fa-file-download"></i> StÃ¡hnout ZÃ¡sobÃ¡rnu otÃ¡zek</a> " Valid syntax: {% include file.ext param='value' param2='value' %} in /home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core/collections/_pages/atlas.md[0m
[31m                    ------------------------------------------------[0m
[31m      Jekyll 4.2.0   Please append `--trace` to the `build` command [0m
[31m                     for any additional information or backtrace. [0m
[31m                    ------------------------------------------------[0m
/home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.7.0/gems/jekyll-4.2.0/lib/jekyll/tags/include.rb:70:in `validate_params': Invalid syntax for include tag: (ArgumentError)

id-prefix="collapse-atlas" counter=3 title="### ÄtenÃ­ s porozumÄnÃ­m: zÃ¡sobÃ¡rna otÃ¡zek pro prÃ¡ci v hodinÃ¡ch
"
content="
Prakticky jakÃ©koliv te

Answer: It shows the invalid syntax
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Valid syntax:

{% include file.ext param='value' param2='value' %}

Answer: This is the example of the valid syntax.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: elpa-mpich-devel >= 2018.05.001
No match for argument: elpa-openmpi-devel >= 2018.05.001]: [Package was retired]


Answer: Issue: Retired package was used
Resolution: Update the spec file to remove/update that support or try to takeover the package maintenance again.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: elpa-mpich-devel >= 2018.05.001
No match for argument: elpa-openmpi-devel >= 2018.05.001

Answer: Package was retired
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ %cmake3_build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BuTcVK: line 47: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BuTcVK (%build)]: [The line where the issue occurred.]
=============
[ cmake3                     ppc64le   3.14.7-1.el7        epel            7.6 M]: [This snippet shows the version of the cmake3 package to be installed in the buildroot.]


Answer: Issue: The %cmake3_build macro did not expand correctly.
Resolution: Make sure that a version of the cmake/cmake3 package which is recent enough is present in the buildroot to provide this macro.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ %cmake3_build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BuTcVK: line 47: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BuTcVK (%build)

Answer: The line where the issue occurred.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 cmake3                     ppc64le   3.14.7-1.el7        epel            7.6 M

Answer: This snippet shows the version of the cmake3 package to be installed in the buildroot.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Run-time dependency libarchive found: NO (tried pkgconfig)

meson.build:1416:13: ERROR: Dependency "libarchive" not found, tried pkgconfi]: [The meson build script requires `libarchive` to be present.]


Answer: Issue: The required dependency `libarchive` is missing.
Resolution: You need to add to the SPEC file:
BuildRequires: libarchive-devel
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Run-time dependency libarchive found: NO (tried pkgconfig)

meson.build:1416:13: ERROR: Dependency "libarchive" not found, tried pkgconfi

Answer: The meson build script requires `libarchive` to be present.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [sdl.c:717:16: error: implicit declaration of function âfabsfâ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  717 |     float d0 = fabsf(fasp - asp);
      |                ^~~~~]: [This is compiler error. Function was used without previous declaration. This is not allowed in many compiled languages, like C. ]
=============
[sdl.c:57:1: note: include â<math.h>â or provide a declaration of âfabsfâ
   56 | #include "sdl.h"
  +++ |+#include <math.h>
   57 | ]: [This is compiler note. Header file `math.h` should be included in the `sdl.c` file.]
=============
[sdl.c:717:16: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function âfabsfâ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  717 |     float d0 = fabsf(fasp - asp);
      |                ^~~~~]: [This is compiler warning. Function `fabsf` which is normally builtin, was implicitly declared in the file `sdl.c`. This is not allowed in C programming language.]
=============
[make: *** [Makefile:26: default] Error 2]: [Make process has failed with an error.]


Answer: Issue: Build of the package failed due to issues with source. These were detected by the compiler in file `sdl.c`.
Resolution: Ensure that all functions are properly declared before usage, and that all needed header files are imported before compiling code and building the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
sdl.c:717:16: error: implicit declaration of function âfabsfâ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  717 |     float d0 = fabsf(fasp - asp);
      |                ^~~~~

Answer: This is compiler error. Function was used without previous declaration. This is not allowed in many compiled languages, like C.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
sdl.c:57:1: note: include â<math.h>â or provide a declaration of âfabsfâ
   56 | #include "sdl.h"
  +++ |+#include <math.h>
   57 | 

Answer: This is compiler note. Header file `math.h` should be included in the `sdl.c` file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
sdl.c:717:16: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function âfabsfâ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  717 |     float d0 = fabsf(fasp - asp);
      |                ^~~~~

Answer: This is compiler warning. Function `fabsf` which is normally builtin, was implicitly declared in the file `sdl.c`. This is not allowed in C programming language.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
make: *** [Makefile:26: default] Error 2

Answer: Make process has failed with an error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAIL: Test-proxied-https-auth.px
FAIL: Test-proxied-https-auth-keepalive.px]: [The snippet shows two failed unit tests. Unfortunately I don't have any verbose output here.]


Answer: Issue: After some investigation, I figured that these tests fail when max optimization during build is enabled.
Resolution: Currently, unit tests are turned off during the build. But disabling optimizations would work as well.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: Test-proxied-https-auth.px
FAIL: Test-proxied-https-auth-keepalive.px

Answer: The snippet shows two failed unit tests. Unfortunately I don't have any verbose output here.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(rpm) >= 4.17.0'
No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(sqlite3) >= 3.35.0'
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(sphinx) >= 4.1.2']: [List of packages that are required but cannot be installed.]
=============
[Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [The actual error why the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: It failed because of missing dependencies.
Packages: rpm, sqlite3 and sphinx are required for the build but could not be installed either at all or in the correct versions.
Resolution: We could either add some repository which provides the missing dependencies or possibly update some already present repository to include the required versions of packages.
Another option could be to change the configuration of the build not to require the missing packages.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(rpm) >= 4.17.0'
No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(sqlite3) >= 3.35.0'
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(sphinx) >= 4.1.2'

Answer: List of packages that are required but cannot be installed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: The actual error why the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [can't find file to patch at input line 22
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -up binutils-2.40/libiberty/acincludev2.m4.config binutils-2.40/libiberty/acincludev2.m4
|--- binutils-2.40/libiberty/acincludev2.m4.config	2023-02-01 00:18:41.739848290 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.40/libiberty/acincludev2.m4	2023-02-01 00:21:33.305019866 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
]: [There was an issue applying patches]


Answer: Issue: File to be modified does not exist or was moved or renamed
Resolution: Check if file exists in current sources and update patch accordingly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
can't find file to patch at input line 22
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -up binutils-2.40/libiberty/acincludev2.m4.config binutils-2.40/libiberty/acincludev2.m4
|--- binutils-2.40/libiberty/acincludev2.m4.config	2023-02-01 00:18:41.739848290 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.40/libiberty/acincludev2.m4	2023-02-01 00:21:33.305019866 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.


Answer: There was an issue applying patches
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: downloading 'https://github.com/SebWouters/CheMPS2/archive/d8ac508.tar.gz' failed
          status_code: 6
          status_string: "Could not resolve hostname"
          log:
          --- LOG BEGIN ---
          Could not resolve host: github.com]: [This snippet shows why the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: Additional upstream source is used during the build and the build failed when trying to download it. The message shows that host name couldn't be resolved.
Resolution: Check the URL of the additional upstream source whether the path to the source is correct. In case it is, check the status of the server and/or retry the build later.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: downloading 'https://github.com/SebWouters/CheMPS2/archive/d8ac508.tar.gz' failed
          status_code: 6
          status_string: "Could not resolve hostname"
          log:
          --- LOG BEGIN ---
          Could not resolve host: github.com

Answer: This snippet shows why the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[headless_shell:458/35389] COPY default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib
FAILED: default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib 
ln -f default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib 2>/dev/null || (rm -rf default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib && cp -af default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib)
cp: cannot stat 'default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib': No such file or directory]: [This relevant error message saying that 'COPY default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib' failed because libadler.rlib is not found.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:459:  [ 92/568] rust-0:1.86.0-1.fc43.x86_64   100% |  51.2 MiB/s |  27.1 MiB |  00m01s]: [Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild]
=============
[Patch #315 (chromium-134-rust-libadler2.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #315 (chromium-134-rust-libadler2.patch):']: [diff -up chromium-134.0.6998.23/build/rust/std/BUILD.gn.than chromium-134.0.6998.23/build/rust/std/BUILD.gn
--- chromium-134.0.6998.23/build/rust/std/BUILD.gn.than 2025-02-24 09:47:57.560506410 +0100
+++ chromium-134.0.6998.23/build/rust/std/BUILD.gn      2025-02-24 09:48:02.335676712 +0100
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ if (toolchain_has_rust) {
     # These are no longer present in the Windows toolchain.
     stdlib_files += [
       "addr2line",
-      "adler2",
+      "adler",
       "gimli",
       "libc",
       "memchr"

This patch file changed adler2 to adler and  was the cause for the build failure]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because there's new rust-1.86 which replaces adler to adler2 in the fedora 42 and rawhide. 
Resolution: Added condition to apply chromium-134-rust-libadler2.patch only when having rust-1.85 or older.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[headless_shell:458/35389] COPY default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib
FAILED: default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib 
ln -f default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib 2>/dev/null || (rm -rf default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib && cp -af default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib default_for_rust_host_build_tools/prebuilt_rustc_sysroot/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libadler.rlib)
cp: cannot stat 'default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib': No such file or directory

Answer: This relevant error message saying that 'COPY default_for_rust_host_build_tools/obj/build/rust/std/libadler.rlib' failed because libadler.rlib is not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  [ 92/568] rust-0:1.86.0-1.fc43.x86_64   100% |  51.2 MiB/s |  27.1 MiB |  00m01s

Answer: Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Patch #315 (chromium-134-rust-libadler2.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #315 (chromium-134-rust-libadler2.patch):'

Answer: diff -up chromium-134.0.6998.23/build/rust/std/BUILD.gn.than chromium-134.0.6998.23/build/rust/std/BUILD.gn
--- chromium-134.0.6998.23/build/rust/std/BUILD.gn.than 2025-02-24 09:47:57.560506410 +0100
+++ chromium-134.0.6998.23/build/rust/std/BUILD.gn      2025-02-24 09:48:02.335676712 +0100
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ if (toolchain_has_rust) {
     # These are no longer present in the Windows toolchain.
     stdlib_files += [
       "addr2line",
-      "adler2",
+      "adler",
       "gimli",
       "libc",
       "memchr"

This patch file changed adler2 to adler and  was the cause for the build failure
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/sfcbd
   /usr/bin/sfcbdump
   /usr/bin/sfcbinst2mof
   /usr/bin/sfcbmof
   /usr/bin/sfcbmofpp
   /usr/bin/sfcbproc
   /usr/bin/sfcbrepos
   /usr/bin/sfcbstage
   /usr/bin/sfcbtrace
   /usr/bin/sfcbunstage
   /usr/bin/sfcbuuid
   /usr/bin/wbemcat
   /usr/bin/xmltest
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbd-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbdump-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbinst2mof-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbmof-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbmofpp-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbproc-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbtrace-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug]: [This snippet says why the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because there were found files that were installed during the build but are not the part of the rpm package.
Resolution: Either erase unneeded, unwanted or temporary files after they are created or installed in %install section of the spec file, or add these files to the package listing them in %files section of the spec file.