fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [2025-04-03T07:29:01.6163994Z CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:1 (cmake_minimum_required):
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6164831Z   Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake.
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6165548Z 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6165851Z   Update the VERSION argument <min> value.  Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6166593Z   to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6167236Z   to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier.
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6167579Z 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6167859Z   Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6168307Z 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6168313Z 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6170165Z -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!]: [Error message explaining that the project requires obsolete CMake version.]


Answer: Issue: The project requires a minimum version of CMake which is no longer supported by the CMake binary used for this build.
Resolution: Either use older CMake binary which is still compatible with this project or port the project to be compatible with newer CMake releases.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6163994Z CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:1 (cmake_minimum_required):
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6164831Z   Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake.
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6165548Z 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6165851Z   Update the VERSION argument <min> value.  Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6166593Z   to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6167236Z   to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier.
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6167579Z 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6167859Z   Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6168307Z 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6168313Z 
2025-04-03T07:29:01.6170165Z -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!

Answer: Error message explaining that the project requires obsolete CMake version.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: %changelog entries must start with *]: [This is the build error]


Answer: Issue: The `%changelog` field in the SPEC file is not valid. The possibility of using autochangelogs was introduced with `rpmautospec`, but it seems it was not reflected here.
Resolution: Add the changelog manually in the SPEC file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: %changelog entries must start with *

Answer: This is the build error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: libgpr-devel]: [Package libgpr-devel is not available in the enabled repositories.]


Answer: Issue: This error typically arises during package installation or compilation processes, specifically when a package manager (like DNF) or a build system cannot find the specified development package, libgpr-devel.
Resolution: Missing Repository: The package repository you're using might not contain the libgpr-devel package. This could be due to the specific distribution you're using or the repository configuration.
Incorrect Package Name: There might be a typo in the package name or a version mismatch.
Package Availability: The package might not be available for your specific system architecture or distribution version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: libgpr-devel

Answer: Package libgpr-devel is not available in the enabled repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [In file included from ../../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/skia/src/core/SkOpts.cpp:16:
../../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/skia/src/opts/SkRasterPipeline_opts.h: In function ‘void portable::set_base_pointer(Params*, SkRasterPipelineStage*, F, F, F, F)’:
../../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/skia/src/opts/SkRasterPipeline_opts.h:1597:31: error: cannot tail-call: target is not able to optimize the call into a sibling call
 1597 |             MUSTTAIL return fn(params, program, r,g,b,a);                                  \
]: [Compiling a source code with gcc failed.]


Answer: Issue: The source code compilation fails because the code uses the "musttail" attribute for a function, but the compiler target doesn't support it.
Resolution: Omit setting the "musttail" attribute for the function.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
In file included from ../../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/skia/src/core/SkOpts.cpp:16:
../../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/skia/src/opts/SkRasterPipeline_opts.h: In function ‘void portable::set_base_pointer(Params*, SkRasterPipelineStage*, F, F, F, F)’:
../../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/skia/src/opts/SkRasterPipeline_opts.h:1597:31: error: cannot tail-call: target is not able to optimize the call into a sibling call
 1597 |             MUSTTAIL return fn(params, program, r,g,b,a);                                  \


Answer: Compiling a source code with gcc failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed Tests (2):
  Clang :: CodeGen/SystemZ/unaligned-symbols.c
  Clang :: Interpreter/cxx20-modules.cppm]: [Multiple tests have failed.]


Answer: Issue: Unit tests have failed during build.
Resolution: Ensure that all tests are passing before initializing build again.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed Tests (2):
  Clang :: CodeGen/SystemZ/unaligned-symbols.c
  Clang :: Interpreter/cxx20-modules.cppm

Answer: Multiple tests have failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Q4Nw3e (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Q4Nw3e (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1
]: [The build failed in %build section.]
=============
[../../src.x11/xcmds.c:2059:6: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
 2059 | void UpdateXCMDS ( state )
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~
make: *** [Makefile:47: compile] Error 2]: [Warning about old-style code.]
=============
[../../src.x11/popdial.c:201:5: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
]: [Warning about old-style code.]


Answer: Issue: The standar for C moved to C23 and the code uses old code that does not work with newer standard.
Resolution: You have to work with upstream and update code to C23 standard.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Q4Nw3e (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Q4Nw3e (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1


Answer: The build failed in %build section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
../../src.x11/xcmds.c:2059:6: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
 2059 | void UpdateXCMDS ( state )
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~
make: *** [Makefile:47: compile] Error 2

Answer: Warning about old-style code.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
../../src.x11/popdial.c:201:5: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]


Answer: Warning about old-style code.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/go-crypto-1.0.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/go-crypto-1.0.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory]: [Sources are not available in Lookaside Cache]


Answer: Issue: Sources are not available in Lookaside Cache
Resolution: Make sure that all files are uploaded correctly. Ensure `sources` contains the correct sources.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/go-crypto-1.0.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory
    Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/go-crypto-1.0.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory

Answer: Sources are not available in Lookaside Cache
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
***   File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/bom.py", line 2
    print "BOM BOOM!"
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(...)?

Compiling '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python3.13-3.13.0~a0-500b0f4814e05b918f485ceebf9c7be9a52ad469.fc41.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/crlf.py'...
***   File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/crlf.py", line 1
    print "hi"
    ^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(...)?

Compiling '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python3.13-3.13.0~a0-500b0f4814e05b918f485ceebf9c7be9a52ad469.fc41.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/different_encoding.py'...
***   File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/different_encoding.py", line 3
    print u'ÃÃ Ã¡Ã¢Ã£Ã¤Ã¥Ã¦Ã§Ã¨Ã©ÃªÃ«Ã¬Ã­Ã®Ã¯Ã°Ã±Ã²Ã³Ã´ÃµÃ¶Ã¸Ã¹ÃºÃ»Ã¼Ã½Ã¾Ã¿ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃ'
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(...)?

Compiling '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python3.13-3.13.0~a0-500b0f4814e05b918f485ceebf9c7be9a52ad469.fc41.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/false_encoding.py'...
***   File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/false_encoding.py", line 2
    print '#coding=0'
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(...)?]: [There is a SyntaxError in it.]


Answer: Issue: Test files with Python 2 syntax were not excluded from Python bytecompilation.
Resolution: Exclude test files with SyntaxErrors from Python bytecompilation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

***   File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/bom.py", line 2
    print "BOM BOOM!"
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(...)?

Compiling '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python3.13-3.13.0~a0-500b0f4814e05b918f485ceebf9c7be9a52ad469.fc41.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/crlf.py'...
***   File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/crlf.py", line 1
    print "hi"
    ^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(...)?

Compiling '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python3.13-3.13.0~a0-500b0f4814e05b918f485ceebf9c7be9a52ad469.fc41.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/different_encoding.py'...
***   File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/different_encoding.py", line 3
    print u'ÃÃ Ã¡Ã¢Ã£Ã¤Ã¥Ã¦Ã§Ã¨Ã©ÃªÃ«Ã¬Ã­Ã®Ã¯Ã°Ã±Ã²Ã³Ã´ÃµÃ¶Ã¸Ã¹ÃºÃ»Ã¼Ã½Ã¾Ã¿ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃ'
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(...)?

Compiling '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python3.13-3.13.0~a0-500b0f4814e05b918f485ceebf9c7be9a52ad469.fc41.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/false_encoding.py'...
***   File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/test/test_lib2to3/data/false_encoding.py", line 2
    print '#coding=0'
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'. Did you mean print(...)?

Answer: There is a SyntaxError in it.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
cc1: all warnings being treated as erro]: [All warnings found by gcc are treated as errors and need to be resolved.]


Answer: Issue: The gcc option `-Werror` makes all warnings into errors.
Resolution: Fix all warnings which gcc treats as errors or don't compile your software with the option `-Werror`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

cc1: all warnings being treated as erro

Answer: All warnings found by gcc are treated as errors and need to be resolved.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : ]: [there was a maven compilation error]
=============
[    method org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils.skip(java.io.InputStream,long) is not applicable]: [there is api incompatibility]


Answer: Issue: package is compiled against a library with slightly incompatible api
Resolution: ensure that the package is compatible with library api or apply a patch porting to different api
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 

Answer: there was a maven compilation error
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    method org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils.skip(java.io.InputStream,long) is not applicable

Answer: there is api incompatibility
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [PHPUnit 7.5.20 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Runtime:       PHP 8.4.7
]: [Test suite uses PHPUnit version 7 with PHP version 8.4]
=============
[PHPUnit\Framework\ExceptionWrapper::originalException(): Implicitly marking parameter $exceptionToStore as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead]: [PHP exception raised by the script]


Answer: Issue: phpunit7 has reached its end of live and is not supported
phpunit7 is not compatible with PHP 8.4 and newer

Resolution: Test needs to run with newer and supported PHPUnit version (phpunit8, phpunit9...)
Test suite may need to be adapted for the newer PHPUnit
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
PHPUnit 7.5.20 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Runtime:       PHP 8.4.7


Answer: Test suite uses PHPUnit version 7 with PHP version 8.4
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
PHPUnit\Framework\ExceptionWrapper::originalException(): Implicitly marking parameter $exceptionToStore as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead

Answer: PHP exception raised by the script
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [libfdt_wrap.c:5626:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
 5626 |     resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, val);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libfdt_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
 1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libfdt_wrap.c: In function ‘_wrap_fdt_get_mem_rsv’:
libfdt_wrap.c:6433:19: error: too few arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
 6433 |       resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, val);
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Build failed because function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’ expected 3 arguments.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to changes in SWIG 4.3.0.
There is new declaration of SWIG_Python_AppendOutput is now:
SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void);
The 3rd parameter is new and the new $isvoid special variable  should be passed to it.
Resolution: There are two ways how to solve it.
* Add the 3rd parameter to indicate whether or not the wrapped function returns void.

* or also consider replacing with:
SWIG_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj);
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
libfdt_wrap.c:5626:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
 5626 |     resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, val);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libfdt_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
 1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libfdt_wrap.c: In function ‘_wrap_fdt_get_mem_rsv’:
libfdt_wrap.c:6433:19: error: too few arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
 6433 |       resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, val);
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Build failed because function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’ expected 3 arguments.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
]: [In essence, the build failed because the required clang version 13.0.0 wasn't available in the system's repositories or couldn't be installed from the specified repository.]


Answer: Issue: The RPM build failed because it couldn't find the necessary clang package version 13.0.0. This dependency is required by the clang-rpm-macros package, which is a crucial component for building RPM packages with Clang. The system couldn't locate or install a suitable clang package to fulfill this dependency, leading to the build failure.
Resolution: You should investigate if clang 13 is available in the repositories. If not, work with the clang maintainer on providing a build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch


Answer: In essence, the build failed because the required clang version 13.0.0 wasn't available in the system's repositories or couldn't be installed from the specified repository.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
In file included from dhcp.c:17:
dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr,  int,  char *, struct in_addr,  struct in_addr,  void *)’
 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
      |                                             ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
dhcp.c:33:12: note: ‘check_listen_addrs’ declared here
   33 | static int check_listen_addrs(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label,
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
dhcp.c:333:44: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  333 |       if (!iface_enumerate(AF_INET, &amp;parm, complete_context))
      |                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                            |
      |                                            int (*)(struct in_addr,  int,  char *, struct in_addr,  struct in_addr,  void *)
dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr,  int,  char *, struct in_addr,  struct in_addr,  void *)’
 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());

Answer: In file included from dhcp.c:17:
dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr,  int,  char *, struct in_addr,  struct in_addr,  void *)’
 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
      |                                             ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
dhcp.c:33:12: note: ‘check_listen_addrs’ declared here
   33 | static int check_listen_addrs(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label,
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
dhcp.c:333:44: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  333 |       if (!iface_enumerate(AF_INET, &amp;parm, complete_context))
      |                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                            |
      |                                            int (*)(struct in_addr,  int,  char *, struct in_addr,  struct in_addr,  void *)
dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr,  int,  char *, struct in_addr,  struct in_addr,  void *)’
 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
In file included from lease.c:17:
dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr,  int,  char *, struct in_addr,  struct in_addr,  void *)’
 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
      |                                             ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
lease.c:385:12: note: ‘find_interface_v4’ declared here
  385 | static int find_interface_v4(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label,
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lease.c:469:35: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  469 |   iface_enumerate(AF_INET6, &now, find_interface_v6);
      |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                   |
      |                                   int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int,  int,  int,  int,  int,  int,  void *)
dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int,  int,  int,  int,  int,  int,  void *)’
 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());

Answer: In file included from lease.c:17:
dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in_addr,  int,  char *, struct in_addr,  struct in_addr,  void *)’
 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
      |                                             ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
lease.c:385:12: note: ‘find_interface_v4’ declared here
  385 | static int find_interface_v4(struct in_addr local, int if_index, char *label,
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lease.c:469:35: error: passing argument 3 of ‘iface_enumerate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  469 |   iface_enumerate(AF_INET6, &now, find_interface_v6);
      |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                   |
      |                                   int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int,  int,  int,  int,  int,  int,  void *)
dnsmasq.h:1662:50: note: expected ‘int (*)(void)’ but argument is of type ‘int (*)(struct in6_addr *, int,  int,  int,  int,  int,  int,  void *)’
 1662 | int iface_enumerate(int family, void *parm, int (callback)());
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/mumble-1.4.287-build/mumble-1.4.287.src/overlay_gl/overlay.c:40:23: error: ‘bool’ cannot be defined via ‘typedef’
   40 | typedef unsigned char bool;
      |                       ^~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/mumble-1.4.287-build/mumble-1.4.287.src/overlay_gl/overlay.c:40:23: note: ‘bool’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
/builddir/build/BUILD/mumble-1.4.287-build/mumble-1.4.287.src/overlay_gl/overlay.c:40:1: warning: useless type name in empty declaration
   40 | typedef unsigned char bool;
      | ^~~~~~~]: [This is where the build failed.  It says that you cannot use an identifier named "bool".]


Answer: Issue: This build used GCC 15, which defaults to the C23 language standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/changes.html#c

C23 added "bool" as a keyword.  This source code is incompatible with C23 because it uses "bool" as an identifier.
Resolution: Patch the source code to no longer use "bool" as an identifier.  The GCC project has a guide for porting code to GCC 15 with helpful tips, such as using the stdbool.h header.

https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/porting_to.html#c23-new-keywords
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/mumble-1.4.287-build/mumble-1.4.287.src/overlay_gl/overlay.c:40:23: error: ‘bool’ cannot be defined via ‘typedef’
   40 | typedef unsigned char bool;
      |                       ^~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/mumble-1.4.287-build/mumble-1.4.287.src/overlay_gl/overlay.c:40:23: note: ‘bool’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
/builddir/build/BUILD/mumble-1.4.287-build/mumble-1.4.287.src/overlay_gl/overlay.c:40:1: warning: useless type name in empty declaration
   40 | typedef unsigned char bool;
      | ^~~~~~~

Answer: This is where the build failed.  It says that you cannot use an identifier named "bool".
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [dev_hash.c:152:8: error: expected expression before ‘void’
  152 |       (void)sprintf (fullname, "%s/%s", dirname, dp->d_name);
      |        ^~~~
dev_hash.c:11:17: error: called object is not a function or function pointer
   11 | # define alloca __builtin_alloca
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
dev_hash.c:148:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘alloca’
  148 |       char *fullname = (char *) alloca ((strlen (dirname)
      |                                 ^~~~~~
dev_hash.c:152:13: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘sprintf’
  152 |       (void)sprintf (fullname, "%s/%s", dirname, dp->d_name);
      |             ^~~~~~~]: [Error report of faulty C code. Missing semicolon.]


Answer: Issue: Missing ';' (semicolon) after an expression in C language.
Resolution: Add a semicolon to the end of the line to complete the expression.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
dev_hash.c:152:8: error: expected expression before ‘void’
  152 |       (void)sprintf (fullname, "%s/%s", dirname, dp->d_name);
      |        ^~~~
dev_hash.c:11:17: error: called object is not a function or function pointer
   11 | # define alloca __builtin_alloca
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
dev_hash.c:148:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘alloca’
  148 |       char *fullname = (char *) alloca ((strlen (dirname)
      |                                 ^~~~~~
dev_hash.c:152:13: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘sprintf’
  152 |       (void)sprintf (fullname, "%s/%s", dirname, dp->d_name);
      |             ^~~~~~~

Answer: Error report of faulty C code. Missing semicolon.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: netcdf4-python-debugsource
No match for argument: python3-debuginfo
No match for argument: python3-netcdf4-debuginfo
No match for argument: python3.13-debugsource]: [These debuginfo and debugsource packages are not available in the repositories.]


Answer: Issue: Debuginfo packages are not available during a build process in a build system, such as Koji or Copr.
Resolution: Debuginfo packages live in separate repositories that are not available during RPM build process. If you need to debug the build process, the best is to do it locally in your environment.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: netcdf4-python-debugsource
No match for argument: python3-debuginfo
No match for argument: python3-netcdf4-debuginfo
No match for argument: python3.13-debugsource

Answer: These debuginfo and debugsource packages are not available in the repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/bootc-1.1.4-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
]: [The check `check-files` failed.]
=============
[RPM build errors:
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/base/ostree
   /usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/base/usr/lib/ostree/prepare-root.conf
   /usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/dracut/usr/lib/dracut.conf.d/10-bootc-base.conf
   /usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/systemd/usr/lib/kernel/install.conf
Child return code was: 1]: [These are the files that are presented in buildroot, but not used in %files section.]


Answer: Issue: You forgot to add `/usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/` to %files section.
Resolution: Add to %files section:
```
%doc %{_prefix}/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/*
```
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/bootc-1.1.4-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:


Answer: The check `check-files` failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/base/ostree
   /usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/base/usr/lib/ostree/prepare-root.conf
   /usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/dracut/usr/lib/dracut.conf.d/10-bootc-base.conf
   /usr/share/doc/bootc/baseimage/systemd/usr/lib/kernel/install.conf
Child return code was: 1

Answer: These are the files that are presented in buildroot, but not used in %files section.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAILED: obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib 
"/usr/bin/python3" "../../build/rust/rustc_wrapper.py" --rustc=../../../../../../usr/bin/rustc --depfile=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.d --rsp=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.rsp -- -Clinker="clang++" --crate-name libyuv_sys ../../third_party/crabbyavif/src/sys/libyuv-sys/src/lib.rs --crate-type rlib --edition=2021 -Dunsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn -Cforce-unwind-tables=no -Crelocation-model=pic -Cdefault-linker-libraries -Zdep-info-omit-d-target -Zmacro-backtrace -Zremap-cwd-prefix=. -Zexternal-clangrt --color=always --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Cembed-bitcode=no -Clto=no -Ccodegen-units=1 --cfg cr_rustc_revision=\"rustc\ 1.79.0\ \(129f3b996\ 2024-06-10\)\ \(Red\ Hat\ 1.79.0-3.el9_5\)\" -Copt-level=3 -Zallow-features= --emit=dep-info=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.d,link -o obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib LDFLAGS RUSTENV OUT_DIR=../../../../../../out/Release/gen/third_party/crabbyavif/crabbyavif_libyuv_sys
error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe]: [The error messages indicate that the rust compiler breaks with the error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe and the build failed]
=============
[bindgen-cli                      x86_64  0.71.1-1.el9                    build  1.9 M]: [Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:461:    rust-1.79.0-3.el9_5.x86_64]: [Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because bindgen with version  0.71 generates rust codes that cannot be compiled with rust-1.79.0 on EPEL9. It's a bug in bindgen and reported https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/issues/3052
Resolution: To fix this issue we need to update rust to the version 1.84 or newer in epel9.
Or patch chromium to pass "--rust-target 1.79" to the bindgen CLI call.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED: obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib 
"/usr/bin/python3" "../../build/rust/rustc_wrapper.py" --rustc=../../../../../../usr/bin/rustc --depfile=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.d --rsp=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.rsp -- -Clinker="clang++" --crate-name libyuv_sys ../../third_party/crabbyavif/src/sys/libyuv-sys/src/lib.rs --crate-type rlib --edition=2021 -Dunsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn -Cforce-unwind-tables=no -Crelocation-model=pic -Cdefault-linker-libraries -Zdep-info-omit-d-target -Zmacro-backtrace -Zremap-cwd-prefix=. -Zexternal-clangrt --color=always --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Cembed-bitcode=no -Clto=no -Ccodegen-units=1 --cfg cr_rustc_revision=\"rustc\ 1.79.0\ \(129f3b996\ 2024-06-10\)\ \(Red\ Hat\ 1.79.0-3.el9_5\)\" -Copt-level=3 -Zallow-features= --emit=dep-info=obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib.d,link -o obj/third_party/crabbyavif/liblibyuv_sys.rlib LDFLAGS RUSTENV OUT_DIR=../../../../../../out/Release/gen/third_party/crabbyavif/crabbyavif_libyuv_sys
error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe

Answer: The error messages indicate that the rust compiler breaks with the error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe and the build failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
bindgen-cli                      x86_64  0.71.1-1.el9                    build  1.9 M

Answer: Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:    rust-1.79.0-3.el9_5.x86_64

Answer: Possible clue for debugging the issue locally with rpmbuild
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.16.3-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-devel-3.13.0-1.fc42.ppc64le" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-hatch-vcs-0.4.0-6.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-hatchling-1.25.0-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(mne) >= 1.7
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-packaging-24.2-2.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-pip-24.3.1-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-pytest-8.3.4-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "tomcli-0.8.0-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1]: [The builddependecies failed to resolve and buildroot cannot be initiated.]


Answer: Issue: The dependency `python3dist(mne) >= 1.7` could not be satisfied.
Resolution: You have to build the dependency of the required version first.

In this case the dependency was required because of

 BuildRequires: %{py3_dist pytest} >= 8

when you relax it to 

 BuildRequires: %{py3_dist pytest}

it will use the lower version of pytest that is present in Fedora and that will work.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.16.3-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-devel-3.13.0-1.fc42.ppc64le" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-hatch-vcs-0.4.0-6.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-hatchling-1.25.0-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(mne) >= 1.7
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-packaging-24.2-2.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-pip-24.3.1-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "python3-pytest-8.3.4-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Package "tomcli-0.8.0-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1

Answer: The builddependecies failed to resolve and buildroot cannot be initiated.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'python3-dnf >= 4.19.]: [Required package python3-dnf is not available in any enabled repository.]


Answer: Issue: Some of the required packages were not installed.

Resolution: Enable a repo with python3-dnf package or download and install the package manually.