fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gen/shim_headers/minizip_shim/third_party/zlib/contrib/minizip/ioapi.h:5:10: fatal error: minizip/ioapi.h: No such file or directory
    5 | #include <minizip/ioapi.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.

Answer: The g++ compilation phase failed. Seems like the `minizip/ioapi.h` file is not present on the include path.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

 minizip-ng-compat-devel              x86_64 3.0.10-7.fc40                       fedora      86.0 K

Answer: The minizip-ng-compat-devel package is being installed.  But the `ng` seems like next-generation or new-generation, so perhaps the header file has changed a location or disappeared?
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CMake Warning (dev) at CMakeLists.txt:1 (PROJECT):
  cmake_minimum_required() should be called prior to this top-level project()
  call.  Please see the cmake-commands(7) manual for usage documentation of
  both commands.
This warning is for project developers.  Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.

-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:2 (CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED):
  Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake.

  Update the VERSION argument <min> value.  Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax
  to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated
  to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier.

  Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.]: [Description of the cause of the build failure]


Answer: Issue: Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake. Though are project has still configured CMake minimum version less than this value.
Resolution: Bump the minimum supported CMake version in the project.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Warning (dev) at CMakeLists.txt:1 (PROJECT):
  cmake_minimum_required() should be called prior to this top-level project()
  call.  Please see the cmake-commands(7) manual for usage documentation of
  both commands.
This warning is for project developers.  Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.

-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:2 (CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED):
  Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake.

  Update the VERSION argument <min> value.  Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax
  to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated
  to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier.

  Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.

Answer: Description of the cause of the build failure
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [11/79 gjs:JS / Gettext                         OK               0.06s   1 subtests passed
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a flags property as some_flags FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a flags property as some-flags FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a flags property as someFlags FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a enum property as some_enum FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a enum property as some-enum FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a enum property as someEnum FAIL          
12/79 gjs:JS / GIMarshalling                   FAIL             0.57s   721/727 subtests passed]: [First failed unit test.]
=============
[35/79 gjs:JS / Regress                         FAIL             0.30s   338/339 subtests passed]: [Second failed unit test.]
=============
[Summary of Failures:
12/79 gjs:JS / GIMarshalling                   FAIL             0.57s   721/727 subtests passed
35/79 gjs:JS / Regress                         FAIL             0.30s   338/339 subtests passed
Ok:                 77  
Expected Fail:      0   
Fail:               2   
Unexpected Pass:    0   
Skipped:            0   
Timeout:            0   
Full log written to /builddir/build/BUILD/gjs-1.84.2-build/gjs-1.84.2/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/testlog.txt
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ikVhB5 (%check)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ikVhB5 (%check)]: [Summary of failed tests.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed in the %check phase due to failing tests.
Resolution: Review the test and code changes for possible regressions.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
11/79 gjs:JS / Gettext                         OK               0.06s   1 subtests passed
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a flags property as some_flags FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a flags property as some-flags FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a flags property as someFlags FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a enum property as some_enum FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a enum property as some-enum FAIL          
▶ 12/79 GObject properties accessors gets and sets a enum property as someEnum FAIL          
12/79 gjs:JS / GIMarshalling                   FAIL             0.57s   721/727 subtests passed

Answer: First failed unit test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
35/79 gjs:JS / Regress                         FAIL             0.30s   338/339 subtests passed

Answer: Second failed unit test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Summary of Failures:
12/79 gjs:JS / GIMarshalling                   FAIL             0.57s   721/727 subtests passed
35/79 gjs:JS / Regress                         FAIL             0.30s   338/339 subtests passed
Ok:                 77  
Expected Fail:      0   
Fail:               2   
Unexpected Pass:    0   
Skipped:            0   
Timeout:            0   
Full log written to /builddir/build/BUILD/gjs-1.84.2-build/gjs-1.84.2/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/testlog.txt
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ikVhB5 (%check)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ikVhB5 (%check)

Answer: Summary of failed tests.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/fwupd-2.0.8-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /etc/grub.d/35_fwupd
RPM build errors:
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /etc/grub.d/35_fwupd]: [RPM complains about unpackaged files.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to extraneous files being found in the RPM installroot that weren't part of the final RPM(s).
Resolution: Make sure all files that are installed during the %install section are mentioned in the %files section in the specfile.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/fwupd-2.0.8-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /etc/grub.d/35_fwupd
RPM build errors:
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /etc/grub.d/35_fwupd

Answer: RPM complains about unpackaged files.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/0001-CMake-Make-LIBOMP_HEADERS_INSTALL_PATH-a-cache-varia.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file runtime/src/CMakeLists.txt.rej]: [This is the place where the problem appeared.]


Answer: Issue: A patch file failed to apply.
Resolution: Examine the reject file to understand what changes couldn't be applied.
Update the patch to match the current state of the source file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/0001-CMake-Make-LIBOMP_HEADERS_INSTALL_PATH-a-cache-varia.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file runtime/src/CMakeLists.txt.rej

Answer: This is the place where the problem appeared.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M e29b271a7c324c60ae20c55b436bb190 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1750921910.574727/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.z78w2yt6:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750921910.574727/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750921910.574727/root/ --releasever 43 install @buildsys-build --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts]: [The command that caused the build to fail.]
=============
[Updating and loading repositories:
 fedora                                 100% |   1.0 MiB/s |  28.4 KiB |  00m00s
 Copr repository                        100% |  89.3 KiB/s |   1.5 KiB |  00m00s
 Additional repo https_download_copr_fe 100% |  11.4 KiB/s | 632.0   B |  00m00s
>>> Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpms
>>> Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpms
>>> Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpms
>>> Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpms
>>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.x
Failed to download metadata (baseurl: "https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly/fedora-43-x86_64/") for repository "https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_rpmsoftwaremanagement_dnf_nightly_fedora_releasever_basearch"
 Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried]: [Output of the command that failed.]


Answer: Issue: It failed to download required repository metadata.
This repository is required for the build.
Resolution: Possibly use a different repository mirror or configure the build to not use that particular repository.
Another option could be just waiting until the repo is available again and then trying again.
Finally if you control the repository investigate why it is not available and fix it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M e29b271a7c324c60ae20c55b436bb190 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1750921910.574727/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.z78w2yt6:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750921910.574727/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750921910.574727/root/ --releasever 43 install @buildsys-build --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

Answer: The command that caused the build to fail.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Updating and loading repositories:
 fedora                                 100% |   1.0 MiB/s |  28.4 KiB |  00m00s
 Copr repository                        100% |  89.3 KiB/s |   1.5 KiB |  00m00s
 Additional repo https_download_copr_fe 100% |  11.4 KiB/s | 632.0   B |  00m00s
>>> Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpms
>>> Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpms
>>> Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpms
>>> Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpms
>>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.x
Failed to download metadata (baseurl: "https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly/fedora-43-x86_64/") for repository "https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_rpmsoftwaremanagement_dnf_nightly_fedora_releasever_basearch"
 Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried

Answer: Output of the command that failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [configure: error: unrecognized option: '--loglevel=debug'
Try './configure --help' for more information
]: [rpm build fails in prep section running configure script]


Answer: Issue: Configure script does not recognize used option
Resolution: Check for typo in the unrecognized option and whether current version supports it. It may have been replaced or dropped.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
configure: error: unrecognized option: '--loglevel=debug'
Try './configure --help' for more information


Answer: rpm build fails in prep section running configure script
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [tar/test/test_copy.c:216: Summary: Failed 396 times
tar/test/test_copy.c:224: Summary: Failed 390 times
tar/test/test_copy.c:250: Summary: Failed 2 times]: [Shows that some tests failed]


Answer: Issue: The test 'tar/test/test_copy.c' failed and thus the %check phase failed
Resolution: Figure out why the test failed and fix the bugs
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tar/test/test_copy.c:216: Summary: Failed 396 times
tar/test/test_copy.c:224: Summary: Failed 390 times
tar/test/test_copy.c:250: Summary: Failed 2 times

Answer: Shows that some tests failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.HwxR2M (%install)]: [The build scriptlet that failed]
=============
[rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/python-fasjson-client-1.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/config.toml.example': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/python-fasjson-client-1.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/tox.ini': No such file or directory]: [The error messages from the scriptlet]


Answer: Issue: The %install scriptlet is failing because some commands didn't exit successfully
Resolution: Change the %install scriptlet to fix the failing commands.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.HwxR2M (%install)

Answer: The build scriptlet that failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/python-fasjson-client-1.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/config.toml.example': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/python-fasjson-client-1.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/tox.ini': No such file or directory

Answer: The error messages from the scriptlet
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [

CMake Error at auxil/binpac/CMakeLists.txt:35 (message):
   Could not find prerequisite package 'BIND']: [Error noting missing prerequisite.]


Answer: Issue: There is a missing build prerequisite.
Resolution: Make sure the build system has all the prerequisites.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 


CMake Error at auxil/binpac/CMakeLists.txt:35 (message):
   Could not find prerequisite package 'BIND'

Answer: Error noting missing prerequisite.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/git-lfs-3.6.1-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/man/man7/git-lfs-faq.7.gz
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/man/man7/git-lfs-faq.7.gz]: [This snippet shows the cause of the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: Because of files that are installed but unpackaged.
Resolution: Specify all files that are being installed in the %files section of the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/git-lfs-3.6.1-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/man/man7/git-lfs-faq.7.gz
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/man/man7/git-lfs-faq.7.gz

Answer: This snippet shows the cause of the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.11 needed by python3-qt5-base-5.15.10-4.fc38.x86_64 from copr_ba]: ["python3-qt5-base" dependency "qt5-qtbase v5.15.11" not met.]
=============
[
Finish: build setup for python-matplotlib-3.8.3-1.fc38.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for python-matplotlib-3.8.3-1.fc38.src.r]: [Although dependencies were not met, the build continued.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to dependency issues.
Resolution: Either add another repository for the dependency to be found or use another library so the dependency is not needed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.11 needed by python3-qt5-base-5.15.10-4.fc38.x86_64 from copr_ba

Answer: "python3-qt5-base" dependency "qt5-qtbase v5.15.11" not met.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Finish: build setup for python-matplotlib-3.8.3-1.fc38.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for python-matplotlib-3.8.3-1.fc38.src.r

Answer: Although dependencies were not met, the build continued.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: Invalid value for '[PATH_OR_URL]': Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(1)
  cmdline: git merge pr-changes/2244
  stdout: 'Auto-merging dnf.spec
Auto-merging dnf/cli/cli.py
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in dnf/cli/cli.py
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.']: [It is the core reason why the srpm build failed.]
=============
[Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.'
]: [Its a helpful message how to fix the build.]


Answer: Issue: During the srpm build it tried to apply patches that had a conflict which git was able to automatically resolve.
Resolution: The patches or source code need to be updated so that the conflict doesn't happen.
Typically you have to try applying the patches manually and update them.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Invalid value for '[PATH_OR_URL]': Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(1)
  cmdline: git merge pr-changes/2244
  stdout: 'Auto-merging dnf.spec
Auto-merging dnf/cli/cli.py
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in dnf/cli/cli.py
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.'

Answer: It is the core reason why the srpm build failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.'


Answer: Its a helpful message how to fix the build.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [../../src/crypto/crypto_util.cc:32:16: error: ‘EnginePointer’ has not been declared in ‘ncrypto’
   32 | using ncrypto::EnginePointer;
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [OpenSSL is utilized but not declered]


Answer: Issue: Issue is that package is build with OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE

Resolution: Either remove the declaration or utilize Guard in the header file using the OPENSLL_NO_ENGINE
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
../../src/crypto/crypto_util.cc:32:16: error: ‘EnginePointer’ has not been declared in ‘ncrypto’
   32 | using ncrypto::EnginePointer;
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: OpenSSL is utilized but not declered
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: cmake(Qt6WebEngineWidgets)]: [Qt6WebEngineWidgets is only available on x86_64 and aarch64 arches.]


Answer: Issue: Qt6WebEngineWidgets build dependency not found.
Resolution: Use this snippet:
%ifarch %{qt6_qtwebengine_arches}
BuildRequires: cmake(Qt6WebEngineWidgets)
%endif
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: cmake(Qt6WebEngineWidgets)

Answer: Qt6WebEngineWidgets is only available on x86_64 and aarch64 arches.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [sh: line 1: git: command not found]: [sh: line 1: git: command not found]


Answer: Issue: git command not found
Resolution: Install git package
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
sh: line 1: git: command not found

Answer: sh: line 1: git: command not found
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [mysql-test-run: *** ERROR: there were failing test cases
]: [The MariaDB / MySQL testsuite failed because of the failing test-cases]
=============
[[ fail ]]: [The test failed for the first time]
=============
[timeout after 900 seconds]: [Reason of the test failure - timeout]
=============
[Test case timeout after 900 seconds
]: [Reason of the test failure - timeout]
=============
[[ retry-fail ]]: [The failed test was retried and failed again]
=============
[timeout after 900 seconds]: [Reason of the test failure - timeout]
=============
[Test case timeout after 900 seconds
]: [Reason of the test failure - timeout]
=============
[--suite-timeout=900 --testcase-timeout=15]: ['mysql-test-run.pl' argument values of the whole testsuite timeout (in minutes) and each test case timeout (in minutes)]


Answer: Issue: The MariaDB / MySQL testsuite failed because of the failing test-cases.
The test-cases failed because of timeout.
Resolution: Try to find out the reason of the test timeout.
Fix the test or enlarge the timeout setting of the 'mysql-test-run.pl'
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
mysql-test-run: *** ERROR: there were failing test cases


Answer: The MariaDB / MySQL testsuite failed because of the failing test-cases
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ fail ]

Answer: The test failed for the first time
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
timeout after 900 seconds

Answer: Reason of the test failure - timeout
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Test case timeout after 900 seconds


Answer: Reason of the test failure - timeout
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ retry-fail ]

Answer: The failed test was retried and failed again
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
--suite-timeout=900 --testcase-timeout=15

Answer: 'mysql-test-run.pl' argument values of the whole testsuite timeout (in minutes) and each test case timeout (in minutes)
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FOjMw5 (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FOjMw5 (%check)]: [Check part of build failed suggesting failed tests]
=============
[pkginfo/tests/test_installed.py:145: AssertionError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED pkginfo/tests/test_installed.py::test_installed_ctor_w_dist_info - Ass...
======================== 1 failed, 198 passed in 0.51s =========================]: [One of the tests failed due to AssertionError in PyTest]
=============
[>           assert(installed.metadata_version == '2.4')
E           AssertionError: assert '2.3' == '2.4'
E             
E             - 2.4
E             + 2.3]: [Installed metadata are in incorrect version]


Answer: Issue: Package test suite finished with one failed test
Resolution: Resolve failing test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FOjMw5 (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FOjMw5 (%check)

Answer: Check part of build failed suggesting failed tests
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
pkginfo/tests/test_installed.py:145: AssertionError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED pkginfo/tests/test_installed.py::test_installed_ctor_w_dist_info - Ass...
======================== 1 failed, 198 passed in 0.51s =========================

Answer: One of the tests failed due to AssertionError in PyTest
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
>           assert(installed.metadata_version == '2.4')
E           AssertionError: assert '2.3' == '2.4'
E             
E             - 2.4
E             + 2.3

Answer: Installed metadata are in incorrect version
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: cannot find symbol]: [java compiler can't find a java symbol referenced in the sources]
=============
[[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : ]: [there is a java compilation issue]


Answer: Issue: build failed compiling java sources with maven due to a missing dependency
Resolution: ensure all dependencies are listed in POM
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: cannot find symbol

Answer: java compiler can't find a java symbol referenced in the sources
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 

Answer: there is a java compilation issue
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [HTML-Proofer found 1 failure!]: [It shows HTML-proofer ended with errors.]
=============
[- ./_site/temata/energetika.html

  *  Build error (line 778)

     No item with slug 57-doprava-ve-meste]: [It shows there was an error building the file "./_site/temata/energetika.html".]


Answer: Issue: The output file "./_site/temata/energetika.html" references an item with slug "57-doprava-ve-meste". However, no such item exists.
Resolution: Add an item with slug "57-doprava-ve-meste" or adjust the slug referenced from file "./_site/temata/energetika.html" to one that exists.
Check for typos in the slug ID.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
HTML-Proofer found 1 failure!

Answer: It shows HTML-proofer ended with errors.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
- ./_site/temata/energetika.html

  *  Build error (line 778)

     No item with slug 57-doprava-ve-meste

Answer: It shows there was an error building the file "./_site/temata/energetika.html".
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'rich']: [This line shows that during the import check run by %pyproject_check_import, the runtime dependency rich is not available.]


Answer: Issue: This package was updated to a new version of the upstream software that adds a new module oci.addons.adk with a runtime dependency on python3-rich.
Resolution: If the new oci.addons.adk module is considered optional functionality, it can be excluded from %pyproject_check_import.  Otherwise, python3-rich needs to be added as a build requirement.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'rich'

Answer: This line shows that during the import check run by %pyproject_check_import, the runtime dependency rich is not available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Whoeaaa!  There's something fishy going on here.
You have a look and see if you detect anything uncanny:
*******************************************************
gcc _autotst.c -o _autotst
_autotst.c:1:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
    1 | main()
      | ^~~~
::::
cc _autotst.c -o _autotst
_autotst.c:1:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
    1 | main()
      | ^~~~
::::
gcc _autotst.c -o _autotst
_autotst.c:1:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
    1 | main()
      | ^~~~
::::
*******************************************************
I suggest you take a look at the definition of CFLAGS* and CC
in the Makefile before you try make again.]: [The log snip shows error during configure phase where the script tries to autodetect compiler and it abilities.]


Answer: Issue: The failure is related to the switch to C23 C standard which disallows definition of function without type.
Resolution: Either add void type to the main() function definiton in the source code or add -std=gnu17 to the CFLAGS to compile with the GNU17 older standard.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Whoeaaa!  There's something fishy going on here.
You have a look and see if you detect anything uncanny:
*******************************************************
gcc _autotst.c -o _autotst
_autotst.c:1:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
    1 | main()
      | ^~~~
::::
cc _autotst.c -o _autotst
_autotst.c:1:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
    1 | main()
      | ^~~~
::::
gcc _autotst.c -o _autotst
_autotst.c:1:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
    1 | main()
      | ^~~~
::::
*******************************************************
I suggest you take a look at the definition of CFLAGS* and CC
in the Makefile before you try make again.

Answer: The log snip shows error during configure phase where the script tries to autodetect compiler and it abilities.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(tqdm) needed by python3-greedyFAS-1.12.3-1.fc36.noarch
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(biopython) needed by python3-greedyFAS-1.12.3-1.fc36.noarch
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(graphviz) needed by python3-greedyFAS-1.12.3-1.fc36.noarch
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.10 needed by python3-greedyFAS-1.12.3-1.fc36.noarch]: [These packages needed by python3-greedyFAS aren't available]


Answer: Issue: These packages needed by python3-greedyFAS aren't available
Resolution: somehow provide these packages
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(tqdm) needed by python3-greedyFAS-1.12.3-1.fc36.noarch
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(biopython) needed by python3-greedyFAS-1.12.3-1.fc36.noarch
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(graphviz) needed by python3-greedyFAS-1.12.3-1.fc36.noarch
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.10 needed by python3-greedyFAS-1.12.3-1.fc36.noarch

Answer: These packages needed by python3-greedyFAS aren't available
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [checking for libusb-config... no
checking for usb_init in -lusb... no
configure: error: Unable to find libusb
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3Se0cU (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3Se0cU (%build)]: [The configure script complains about missing libusb dependency.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to a missing libusb dependency.
Resolution: Add a BuildRequires to the specfile with a package that provides the necessary dependency.