fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No working C compiler found. Tried cc and gcc.]: [C compilers are missing.]


Answer: Issue: cc or gcc compilers are needed during build process and are not present on the system.
Resolution: Add gcc compilers to build requires:
BuildRequires: gcc
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No working C compiler found. Tried cc and gcc.

Answer: C compilers are missing.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Processing files: python3-spaceone-api-2.0.408-1.fc42.noarch

Error: The version in the Python package metadata 0.0.0 normalizes to zero.
It's likely a packaging error caused by missing version information
(e.g. when using a version control system snapshot as a source).
Try providing the version information manually when building the Python package]: [The contributor has likely missed updating the version data for python3-spaceone-api-2.0.408-1.fc42.noarch]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 4b7f02a2e55f488bae4cee92351b85ff -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-1746774432.858283/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.cmihosjs:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep  --target x86_64 /builddir/build/originals/python-spaceone-api.spec']: [Container failed to spawn since the version details for python3-spaceone-api-2.0.408-1.fc42.noarch were inaccurate i.e. 0.0.0 or 0]


Answer: Issue: Version details not mentioned for package python3-spaceone-api-2.0.408-1.fc42.noarch
Resolution: The contributor should mention the version details and release a new package for python3-spaceone-api-2.0.408-1.fc42.noarch
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Processing files: python3-spaceone-api-2.0.408-1.fc42.noarch

Error: The version in the Python package metadata 0.0.0 normalizes to zero.
It's likely a packaging error caused by missing version information
(e.g. when using a version control system snapshot as a source).
Try providing the version information manually when building the Python package

Answer: The contributor has likely missed updating the version data for python3-spaceone-api-2.0.408-1.fc42.noarch
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 4b7f02a2e55f488bae4cee92351b85ff -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-42-x86_64-1746774432.858283/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.cmihosjs:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep  --target x86_64 /builddir/build/originals/python-spaceone-api.spec'

Answer: Container failed to spawn since the version details for python3-spaceone-api-2.0.408-1.fc42.noarch were inaccurate i.e. 0.0.0 or 0
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [>       from snakemake import __version__ as snakemake_version
E       ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'snakemake']: [Snippet with missing module.]


Answer: Issue: Missing dependency (python module).
Resolution: Ensure the dependency is installed and add it to build dependency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
>       from snakemake import __version__ as snakemake_version
E       ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'snakemake'

Answer: Snippet with missing module.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'poetry']: [Error message a bout a missing command]
=============
[Command: poetry --version]: [Packit is trying to run this command]
=============
[Poetry (2.1.2) is installed now. Great!]: [Poetry has been installed]


Answer: Issue: The Packit configuration was wrong: the installed poetry command is not available in further packit steps.
Resolution: Make the installed poetry command available to the following Packit steps by adding $HOME/.local/bin to the PATH environment variable. You can use:
echo "export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin" >> $HOME/.bashrc
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'poetry'

Answer: Error message a bout a missing command
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Command: poetry --version

Answer: Packit is trying to run this command
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Poetry (2.1.2) is installed now. Great!

Answer: Poetry has been installed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1341502 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
]: [Core dump of underlying bcc]
=============
[/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1341668 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
]: [Core dump of underlying bcc]


Answer: Issue: The underlying bcc has core-dumped due to a know error in older llvm
Resolution: This is an issue in older llvm. If the issue re-occurrences, please report it to the bcc (kernel) team. See  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-70250 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-66060 for more issues
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1341502 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python


Answer: Core dump of underlying bcc
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1341668 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python


Answer: Core dump of underlying bcc
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHqA1L: line 81: syntax error near unexpected token `&lt;&lt;&lt;'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHqA1L (%install)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHqA1L (%install)
Child return code was: 1]: [The first line shows where the syntax error has occurred and which sequence of character has caused it.]


Answer: Issue: Leftover `&lt;&lt;&lt;' or '<<<' characters in the spec file on line 81. Coming from unresolved Git merge conflict. 
Resolution: Make sure that the spec file doesn't contain these characters. Resolve the possible merge conflict which may have caused this build failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHqA1L: line 81: syntax error near unexpected token `&lt;&lt;&lt;'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHqA1L (%install)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QHqA1L (%install)
Child return code was: 1

Answer: The first line shows where the syntax error has occurred and which sequence of character has caused it.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(parameterized) >= 0.7 with python3dist(parameterized) < 0.8)]: [This error suggests that your system doesn't have the necessary parameterized package within the specified version range (0.7 to 0.8). ]
=============
[Problem 2: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(attrs) >= 22.2 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(jsonschema-specifications) >= 2023.3.6 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(referencing) >= 0.28.4 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(rpds-py) >= 0.7.1 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
]: [The builder doesn't have the specific Python 3.12 Application Binary Interface (ABI) required by python3-jsonschema. ]


Answer: Issue: There is a complex dependency issue within the builder environment, specifically related to the python3-jsonschema package and its required dependencies.
Resolution: Work with the maintainer of the affected packages so they can build them and make available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(parameterized) >= 0.7 with python3dist(parameterized) < 0.8)

Answer: This error suggests that your system doesn't have the necessary parameterized package within the specified version range (0.7 to 0.8).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 2: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(attrs) >= 22.2 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(jsonschema-specifications) >= 2023.3.6 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(referencing) >= 0.28.4 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(rpds-py) >= 0.7.1 needed by python3-jsonschema-4.22.0-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base


Answer: The builder doesn't have the specific Python 3.12 Application Binary Interface (ABI) required by python3-jsonschema.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 2bcb87b719ec472d967486465205267d -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64-bootstrap-1706184257.512262/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.68g7uaxf:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64-1706184257.512262/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64-1706184257.512262/root/ --releasever 39 --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock /var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64-1706184257.512262/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/cp2k-2024.1-3.fc39.src.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                                  45 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Additional repo copr_lecris_release              45 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
fedora                                          765 kB/s |  24 kB     00:00    
updates                                         594 kB/s |  23 kB     00:00    
No matching package to install: 'dbcsr-devel >= 2.6.0'
No matching package to install: 'dbcsr-mpich-devel >= 2.6.0'
No matching package to install: 'dbcsr-openmpi-devel >= 2.6.0]: [Mock tried to install BuildRequires (build dependencies) `dbcsr-devel`, `dbcsr-mpich-devel` and `dbcsr-openmp-devel` in specific versions.  These dependencies were not available.]


Answer: Issue: Missing BuildRequires in rpm repositories enabled during Mock build.
Resolution: Fix the dependencies so they point to existing packages, or provide the missing packages in the buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 2bcb87b719ec472d967486465205267d -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64-bootstrap-1706184257.512262/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.68g7uaxf:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64-1706184257.512262/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64-1706184257.512262/root/ --releasever 39 --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock /var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64-1706184257.512262/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/cp2k-2024.1-3.fc39.src.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                                  45 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Additional repo copr_lecris_release              45 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
fedora                                          765 kB/s |  24 kB     00:00    
updates                                         594 kB/s |  23 kB     00:00    
No matching package to install: 'dbcsr-devel >= 2.6.0'
No matching package to install: 'dbcsr-mpich-devel >= 2.6.0'
No matching package to install: 'dbcsr-openmpi-devel >= 2.6.0

Answer: Mock tried to install BuildRequires (build dependencies) `dbcsr-devel`, `dbcsr-mpich-devel` and `dbcsr-openmp-devel` in specific versions.  These dependencies were not available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.742tWM (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.742tWM (%build)
Child return code was: 1
]: [The build failed in %build phase.]
=============
[dict-generate.cpp:1006:32: note: ‘uint64_t’ is defined in header ‘<cstdint>’; this is probably fixable by adding ‘#include <cstdint>’
]: [You are missing a type that is defined in cstdint header file.]


Answer: Issue: In C++11 there is new standard header file `cstdint` that includes some definitions that was previously in stdint.
Resolution: You need to patch the source and add this line to includes:

#include <cstdint>

You should notify upstream about this.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.742tWM (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.742tWM (%build)
Child return code was: 1


Answer: The build failed in %build phase.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
dict-generate.cpp:1006:32: note: ‘uint64_t’ is defined in header ‘<cstdint>’; this is probably fixable by adding ‘#include <cstdint>’


Answer: You are missing a type that is defined in cstdint header file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error:
 Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(botocore) < 1.35~~ with python3dist(botocore) >= 1.34.30)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(s3transfer) < 0.11~~ with python3dist(s3transfer) >= 0.10)
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)]: [Required combination of packages botocore and s3transfer is no available in installed repositories.]
=============
[Copr build error: Build failed]: [Build failure message.]
=============
[  sudo dnf install copr-rpmbuild
  /usr/bin/copr-rpmbuild --verbose --drop-resultdir --task-url https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/backend/get-build-task/6972137-fedora-38-x86_64 --chroot fedora-38-x86_64]: [Reproducer command]


Answer: Issue: Required packages were not available when requested.
Resolution: Ensure that all required packages are available for package manager, and are free of conflicts.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error:
 Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(botocore) < 1.35~~ with python3dist(botocore) >= 1.34.30)
 Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(s3transfer) < 0.11~~ with python3dist(s3transfer) >= 0.10)
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Answer: Required combination of packages botocore and s3transfer is no available in installed repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  sudo dnf install copr-rpmbuild
  /usr/bin/copr-rpmbuild --verbose --drop-resultdir --task-url https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/backend/get-build-task/6972137-fedora-38-x86_64 --chroot fedora-38-x86_64

Answer: Reproducer command
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/leapp/utils/lock.py", line 77
    return os.access(f'/proc/{old_pid}/stat', os.F_OK)
                                           ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax]: [This error is about the syntax error in code for Python2.]


Answer: Issue: The code contains f-string which is possible to define since Python3.6, but this code is interepreted by Python2.
Resolution: Do not use f-string in the code supposed to be Python2 compatible. instead `str.format` function.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/leapp/utils/lock.py", line 77
    return os.access(f'/proc/{old_pid}/stat', os.F_OK)
                                           ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

Answer: This error is about the syntax error in code for Python2.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Copr build error: Build fail]: [Final build failure message.]
=============
[No match for argument: libldb-devel >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: libtalloc-devel >= 2.4.2
No match for argument: libtdb-devel >= 1.4.10
No match for argument: libtevent-devel >= 0.16.1
No match for argument: python3-ldb >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: python3-ldb-devel >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: python3-talloc-devel >= 2.4.2
No match for argument: python3-tdb >= 1.4.10
No match for argument: python3-tevent >= 0.16.1]: [Multiple unmatched dependencies. ]


Answer: Issue: Several required packages couldn't be found.
Resolution: Check if required packages actually exist and are present in the repos.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: libldb-devel >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: libtalloc-devel >= 2.4.2
No match for argument: libtdb-devel >= 1.4.10
No match for argument: libtevent-devel >= 0.16.1
No match for argument: python3-ldb >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: python3-ldb-devel >= 2.9.0
No match for argument: python3-talloc-devel >= 2.4.2
No match for argument: python3-tdb >= 1.4.10
No match for argument: python3-tevent >= 0.16.1

Answer: Multiple unmatched dependencies.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: %changelog entries must start with *
]: [specfile %changelog formatting error]
=============
[error: %changelog entries must start with *
]: [specfile %changelog formatting error]
=============
[error: File must begin with "/": %{bash_completions_dir}/ramalama]: [Path of the installed file doesn't begin with /]
=============
[RPM build errors:
    %changelog entries must start with *
    File must begin with "/": %{bash_completions_dir}/ramalama]: [summary of the rpm build errors]


Answer: Issue: The changelog is not formatted properly and one of the installed files doesn't have correct path specified.
Resolution: 1. Fix the changelog formatting
2. Correct the path for the installed files
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: %changelog entries must start with *


Answer: specfile %changelog formatting error
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File must begin with "/": %{bash_completions_dir}/ramalama

Answer: Path of the installed file doesn't begin with /
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    %changelog entries must start with *
    File must begin with "/": %{bash_completions_dir}/ramalama

Answer: summary of the rpm build errors
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [debuginfod.cxx:133:23: fatal error: curl/curl.h: No such file or directory
 #include <curl/curl.h>
]: [build failure]


Answer: Issue: wrong libcurl-devel version installed, maybe from modular httpd24
Resolution: be more specific with buildrequires
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
debuginfod.cxx:133:23: fatal error: curl/curl.h: No such file or directory
 #include <curl/curl.h>


Answer: build failure
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
RPM build errors:
    Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/plymouth-0.9.5-7.20210331git1ea1020.amzn2023.x86_64/usr/lib/systemd/system
Finish: rpmbuild plymouth-0.9.5-7.20210331git1ea1020.amzn2023.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for plymouth-0.9.5-7.20210331git1ea1020.amzn2023.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710357711.366274/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.l]: [shows RPM build error]


Answer: Issue: directory not found
Resolution: make sure the directory exists
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

RPM build errors:
    Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/plymouth-0.9.5-7.20210331git1ea1020.amzn2023.x86_64/usr/lib/systemd/system
Finish: rpmbuild plymouth-0.9.5-7.20210331git1ea1020.amzn2023.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for plymouth-0.9.5-7.20210331git1ea1020.amzn2023.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710357711.366274/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.l

Answer: shows RPM build error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [module-info.java:[22,27] module not found: org.objectweb.asm]: [java module (jpms) was not found]
=============
[[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : ]: [java compilation failed]


Answer: Issue: java package depends on module which was not found.
Resolution: ensure that dependency package is modularized correctly - it must be built as a java module
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
module-info.java:[22,27] module not found: org.objectweb.asm

Answer: java module (jpms) was not found
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 

Answer: java compilation failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dracut-105-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/45ifcfg
]: [Error message for a file/folder not found on the file system.]
=============
[RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dracut-105-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/45ifcfg
]: [Second error message for a file/folder not found on the file system.]


Answer: Issue: A file/folder is missing on a file system, but is specified in the spec file.
Resolution: Remove the file/folder entry from the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dracut-105-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/45ifcfg


Answer: Error message for a file/folder not found on the file system.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dracut-105-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/45ifcfg


Answer: Second error message for a file/folder not found on the file system.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install both python3-packaging-24.2-3.fc42.noarch from fedora and python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch from @System
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests]: [The snippet shows the conflicting requirements.]


Answer: Issue: The build requirements cannot be satisfied because there is a conflict between them.
Resolution: Find the source of the conflict and fix it. It'll probably require removing a version limit from one of the requirements.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install both python3-packaging-24.2-3.fc42.noarch from fedora and python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch from @System
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests

Answer: The snippet shows the conflicting requirements.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Attempting to install module '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/selinux-policy-40.10-1.varrun.3.fc40.noarch/usr/share/selinux/targeted/wireshark.pFound conflicting filecon rules
  at /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/selinux-policy-40.10-1.varrun.3.fc40.noarch/var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/100/base/cil:21001
  at /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/selinux-policy-40.10-1.varrun.3.fc40.noarch/var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/100/base/cil:21002
Problems processing filecon rules
Failed post db handling
Post process failed
/usr/sbin/semodule:  Failed!
p']: [SELinux module wireshark cannot be installed. Filecon rules are used to define the security context of files, directories, and devices. In this case, the SELinux policy is attempting to install a new filecon rule that conflicts with an existing rule.]


Answer: Issue: The most likely cause of this error is that there are two different rules that are trying to define the same security context for a file or directory. This can happen if two different SELinux modules are both trying to define the security context for the same object.
Resolution: The first step to resolving this error is to identify the conflicting filecon rules. You can do this by examining the SELinux policy and looking for rules that are associated with the wireshark module. Once you have identified the conflicting rules, you can either modify or remove one of the rules to resolve the conflict.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Attempting to install module '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/selinux-policy-40.10-1.varrun.3.fc40.noarch/usr/share/selinux/targeted/wireshark.pFound conflicting filecon rules
  at /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/selinux-policy-40.10-1.varrun.3.fc40.noarch/var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/100/base/cil:21001
  at /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/selinux-policy-40.10-1.varrun.3.fc40.noarch/var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/100/base/cil:21002
Problems processing filecon rules
Failed post db handling
Post process failed
/usr/sbin/semodule:  Failed!
p'

Answer: SELinux module wireshark cannot be installed. Filecon rules are used to define the security context of files, directories, and devices. In this case, the SELinux policy is attempting to install a new filecon rule that conflicts with an existing rule.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-nanobind-2.7.0-build/BUILDROOT/not/existing/path]: [This indicates that a file listed in the %files section could not be found.]


Answer: Issue: The %files section lists a file that doesn't exist in the buildroot.
Resolution: Only list files in %files sections that do exist. Remove /not/existing/path from %files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-nanobind-2.7.0-build/BUILDROOT/not/existing/path

Answer: This indicates that a file listed in the %files section could not be found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 88, in <module>
    run_cmd(mock + ['--install'] + pkgs)
    ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd
    return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)]: [Traceback from Python runtime, caused by `CalledProcessError` exception being raised from within as script. ]
=============
[No match for argument: java-17-openjdk-devel]: [Package `java-17-openjdk-devel` was not found by the package manager.]


Answer: Issue: One of the required packages,`java-17-openjdk-devel`, was not retrieved by the package manager.
Resolution: Check if the `java-17-openjdk-devel` package is available from installed repositories. If it is not, contact maintainers or add relevant repositories before retrying the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 88, in <module>
    run_cmd(mock + ['--install'] + pkgs)
    ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd
    return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)

Answer: Traceback from Python runtime, caused by `CalledProcessError` exception being raised from within as script.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: java-17-openjdk-devel

Answer: Package `java-17-openjdk-devel` was not found by the package manager.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)]: [Message indicating that no package provides requested dependency with these version constraints.]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 9d53ef4696a34de5ba09f897d706c062 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1735893305.829320/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.vbfkeo7q:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1735893305.829320/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1735893305.829320/root/ --releasever 42 /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1735893305.829320/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/python-cdktf-cdktf-provider-spotinst-13.40.0-1.fc42.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts]: [Message indicating error occurred during the build. This is a generic error message, with attached command which was executed. It does not provide any information necessary to diagnose the issue.]


Answer: Issue: Requested dependency python3dist(setuptools) was not available within specified version constraints.
Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies are available within installed repos before attempting a build. Unless features specific to a version are necessary, consider loosening constraints, to allow for admission of otherwise excluded versions.