fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)

Answer: Message indicating that no package provides requested dependency with these version constraints.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 9d53ef4696a34de5ba09f897d706c062 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1735893305.829320/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.vbfkeo7q:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1735893305.829320/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1735893305.829320/root/ --releasever 42 /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1735893305.829320/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/python-cdktf-cdktf-provider-spotinst-13.40.0-1.fc42.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

Answer: Message indicating error occurred during the build. This is a generic error message, with attached command which was executed. It does not provide any information necessary to diagnose the issue.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [build/src/github.com/jad0s/libretalk/internal/chat/upload.go:14:2: cannot find package "github.com/google/uuid" in any of:
	/usr/lib/golang/src/github.com/google/uuid (from $GOROOT)
	/builddir/build/BUILD/golang-github-jad0s-libretalk-0-build/libretalk-2a3dc8b1f83162a96218a80ffa7d9e08fd26e4d0/_build/src/github.com/google/uuid (from $GOPATH)
	/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/google/uuid]: [Required package `github.com/google/uuid` couldn't be found, in any of the expected locations.]


Answer: Issue: Multiple dependencies were not available at build time. This caused a compilation failure.
Resolution: Ensure all required dependencies are available at the time of build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
build/src/github.com/jad0s/libretalk/internal/chat/upload.go:14:2: cannot find package "github.com/google/uuid" in any of:
	/usr/lib/golang/src/github.com/google/uuid (from $GOROOT)
	/builddir/build/BUILD/golang-github-jad0s-libretalk-0-build/libretalk-2a3dc8b1f83162a96218a80ffa7d9e08fd26e4d0/_build/src/github.com/google/uuid (from $GOPATH)
	/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/google/uuid

Answer: Required package `github.com/google/uuid` couldn't be found, in any of the expected locations.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1806927'
server exited unexpectedly]: [Record of tmux crash]


Answer: Issue: The tmux tool has core-dumped.
Resolution: This is a known issue. Please ask the tmux team to fix it in the following ticket: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80294
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1806927'
server exited unexpectedly

Answer: Record of tmux crash
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/bin/tar: Removing leading `/' from member names]: [Could be an issue. Tar does not like leading '/'. You could use --absolute-names to avoid this error]
=============
[No match for argument: openssl-dev]: [Could be another cause of failure. Dependancy not resolved]


Answer: Issue: Either tar issue(less likely) or dependancy not resolved
Resolution: Find another way to source openssl-dev into your chroot
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/bin/tar: Removing leading `/' from member names

Answer: Could be an issue. Tar does not like leading '/'. You could use --absolute-names to avoid this error
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: openssl-dev

Answer: Could be another cause of failure. Dependancy not resolved
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ela/date.c:7:16: error: cannot use keyword ‘false’ as enumeration constant
    7 | typedef enum { false, true } bool;
      |                ^~~~~
ela/date.c:7:16: note: ‘false’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
ela/date.c:7:30: error: expected ‘;’, identifier or ‘(’ before ‘bool’
    7 | typedef enum { false, true } bool;
      |                              ^~~~
ela/date.c:7:30: warning: useless type name in empty declaration]: [the relevant error messages saying that  false, true and bool are the keyword and cannot be used in ela/date.c]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because gcc15 which defaults to C23 in which bool, true and false are now keywords
Resolution: Remove the line  "typedef enum { false, true } bool;" in ela/date.c and replace it with "#include <stdbool.h>" which includes define for   false, true and bool
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ela/date.c:7:16: error: cannot use keyword ‘false’ as enumeration constant
    7 | typedef enum { false, true } bool;
      |                ^~~~~
ela/date.c:7:16: note: ‘false’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
ela/date.c:7:30: error: expected ‘;’, identifier or ‘(’ before ‘bool’
    7 | typedef enum { false, true } bool;
      |                              ^~~~
ela/date.c:7:30: warning: useless type name in empty declaration

Answer: the relevant error messages saying that  false, true and bool are the keyword and cannot be used in ela/date.c
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.9.2
]: [It's a missing package dependency]
=============
[No match for argument: python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.9.2
]: [Missing package dependency]


Answer: Issue: There's no available package satisfying the version requirement.
Resolution: Need to package the dependency separately to satisfy the build dependency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.9.2


Answer: It's a missing package dependency
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.9.2


Answer: Missing package dependency
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M d32024db04fc4db4b658aa1e7b8fac14 -D /var/lib/mock/centos-stream-9-x86_64-1749000326.853175/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.0efa_cqs:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/librepo.spec']: [It shows which command failed.]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/librepo-1.20.0-0.20250604011547.1.19.0+21.g0750130/librepo/metadata_downloader.c:538:20: error: 'false' undeclared (first use in this function)
  538 |             assert(false);
      |                    ^~~~~]: [It shows the root cause of why did the build failed.]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/librepo-1.20.0-0.20250604011547.1.19.0+21.g0750130/librepo/metadata_downloader.c:35:1: note: 'false' is defined in header '&lt;stdbool.h&gt;'; did you forget to '#include &lt;stdbool.h&gt;'?
   34 | #include "librepo.h"
  +++ |+#include &lt;stdbool.h&gt;
   35 | ]: [It is a useful suggestion how to fix the error]


Answer: Issue: It failed because 'false' was undeclared, since c99 this is declared in stdbool.h and if its not handled by the compiler it needs to be included.
Resolution: Include <stdbool.h> in metadata_downloader.c.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M d32024db04fc4db4b658aa1e7b8fac14 -D /var/lib/mock/centos-stream-9-x86_64-1749000326.853175/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.0efa_cqs:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/librepo.spec'

Answer: It shows which command failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/librepo-1.20.0-0.20250604011547.1.19.0+21.g0750130/librepo/metadata_downloader.c:538:20: error: 'false' undeclared (first use in this function)
  538 |             assert(false);
      |                    ^~~~~

Answer: It shows the root cause of why did the build failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/librepo-1.20.0-0.20250604011547.1.19.0+21.g0750130/librepo/metadata_downloader.c:35:1: note: 'false' is defined in header '&lt;stdbool.h&gt;'; did you forget to '#include &lt;stdbool.h&gt;'?
   34 | #include "librepo.h"
  +++ |+#include &lt;stdbool.h&gt;
   35 | 

Answer: It is a useful suggestion how to fix the error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ %cmake . -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR=ppc64le -DCMAKE_COMPILE_WARNING_AS_ERROR=0 -DMARIADB_UNIX_ADDR=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock -DMARIADB_PORT=3306 -DWITH_EXTERNAL_ZLIB=ON -DWITH_SSL=OPENSSL -DWITH_MYSQLCOMPAT=ON -DPLUGIN_CLIENT_ED25519=DYNAMIC -DDEFAULT_SSL_VERIFY_SERVER_CERT=OFF -DINSTALL_LAYOUT=RPM -DINSTALL_BINDIR=bin -DINSTALL_LIBDIR=lib64 -DINSTALL_INCLUDEDIR=include/mysql -DINSTALL_PLUGINDIR=lib64/mariadb/plugin -DINSTALL_PCDIR=lib64/pkgconfig -DWITH_UNIT_TESTS=ON
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.33qvHv: line 56: fg: no job control]: [The calling of the %cmake macro failed during the build of the package.]


Answer: Issue: The %cmake macro failed during it's call this may be because cmake is not listed in the BuildRequires of the package.
Resolution: Ensure that cmake is listed as a BuildRequires of the package when you are using it during the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ %cmake . -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR=ppc64le -DCMAKE_COMPILE_WARNING_AS_ERROR=0 -DMARIADB_UNIX_ADDR=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock -DMARIADB_PORT=3306 -DWITH_EXTERNAL_ZLIB=ON -DWITH_SSL=OPENSSL -DWITH_MYSQLCOMPAT=ON -DPLUGIN_CLIENT_ED25519=DYNAMIC -DDEFAULT_SSL_VERIFY_SERVER_CERT=OFF -DINSTALL_LAYOUT=RPM -DINSTALL_BINDIR=bin -DINSTALL_LIBDIR=lib64 -DINSTALL_INCLUDEDIR=include/mysql -DINSTALL_PLUGINDIR=lib64/mariadb/plugin -DINSTALL_PCDIR=lib64/pkgconfig -DWITH_UNIT_TESTS=ON
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.33qvHv: line 56: fg: no job control

Answer: The calling of the %cmake macro failed during the build of the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:   gcc                        x86_64 15.1.1-1.fc43           fedora     111.0 MiB

Answer: GCC version is 15 or higher.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/libvpl-tools-1.4.0-build/libvpl-tools-1.4.0/tools/legacy/sample_vpp/src/sample_vpp_frc_adv.cpp:60:11: error: ‘uint64_t’ was not declared in this scope
   60 |         ((uint64_t)m_videoParam.vpp.In.FrameRateExtD * (uint64_t)MFX_TIME_STAMP_FREQUENCY) /
      |           ^~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/libvpl-tools-1.4.0-build/libvpl-tools-1.4.0/tools/legacy/sample_vpp/src/sample_vpp_frc_adv.cpp:11:1: note: ‘uint64_t’ is defined in header ‘<cstdint>’; this is probably fixable by adding ‘#include <cstdint>’
   10 | #include "vm/strings_defs.h"
  +++ |+#include <cstdint>
   11 | 
/builddir/build/BUILD/libvpl-tools-1.4.0-build/libvpl-tools-1.4.0/tools/legacy/sample_vpp/src/sample_vpp_frc_adv.cpp:60:20: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘m_videoParam’
   60 |         ((uint64_t)m_videoParam.vpp.In.FrameRateExtD * (uint64_t)MFX_TIME_STAMP_FREQUENCY) /
      |         ~          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                    )
]: [It showed the gcc compilation error]


Answer: Issue: missing header file in the failed to compile source file
Resolution: Add the missing header file as
"#include <cstdint>" in the reported failed to compile source file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/libvpl-tools-1.4.0-build/libvpl-tools-1.4.0/tools/legacy/sample_vpp/src/sample_vpp_frc_adv.cpp:60:11: error: ‘uint64_t’ was not declared in this scope
   60 |         ((uint64_t)m_videoParam.vpp.In.FrameRateExtD * (uint64_t)MFX_TIME_STAMP_FREQUENCY) /
      |           ^~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/libvpl-tools-1.4.0-build/libvpl-tools-1.4.0/tools/legacy/sample_vpp/src/sample_vpp_frc_adv.cpp:11:1: note: ‘uint64_t’ is defined in header ‘<cstdint>’; this is probably fixable by adding ‘#include <cstdint>’
   10 | #include "vm/strings_defs.h"
  +++ |+#include <cstdint>
   11 | 
/builddir/build/BUILD/libvpl-tools-1.4.0-build/libvpl-tools-1.4.0/tools/legacy/sample_vpp/src/sample_vpp_frc_adv.cpp:60:20: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘m_videoParam’
   60 |         ((uint64_t)m_videoParam.vpp.In.FrameRateExtD * (uint64_t)MFX_TIME_STAMP_FREQUENCY) /
      |         ~          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                    )


Answer: It showed the gcc compilation error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dpdk-24.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/dpdk-dumpcap
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dpdk-24.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/dpdk-pdump]: [Files dpdk-dumpcap and dpdk-pdump are meant to be installed in the buildroot but are not there.]


Answer: Issue: File paths /usr/bin/dpdk-dumpcap and /usr/bin/dpdk-pdump are defined in the %files section but unfortunately these are not present in the buildroot.
Resolution: Either update your %files section by removing these 2 files or make sure they are properly installed in the expected target location.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dpdk-24.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/dpdk-dumpcap
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/dpdk-24.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/dpdk-pdump

Answer: Files dpdk-dumpcap and dpdk-pdump are meant to be installed in the buildroot but are not there.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.18.1-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-devel-3.13.3-1.fc43.x86_64" is already installed.
No match for argument: python3dist(linode-metadata) >= 0.3
No match for argument: python3dist(openapi3)
Package "python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pip-25.0.1-3.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-setuptools-78.1.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-wheel-1:0.45.1-6.fc43.noarch" is already installed.]: [Describes the failed transaction.]


Answer: Issue: Some of the build requirements are not satisfied. There is no package providing "python3dist(linode-metadata) >= 0.3" and no package providing "python3dist(openapi3)".
Resolution: Take a look at what happened to those dependencies and why they are no longer available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.18.1-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-devel-3.13.3-1.fc43.x86_64" is already installed.
No match for argument: python3dist(linode-metadata) >= 0.3
No match for argument: python3dist(openapi3)
Package "python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pip-25.0.1-3.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-setuptools-78.1.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-wheel-1:0.45.1-6.fc43.noarch" is already installed.

Answer: Describes the failed transaction.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
+ %generate_buildrequires
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxlaKs: line 43: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxlaKs (%pre]: [The error message is very cryptic but `fg: no job control` usually means that an RPM macro is not defined.]


Answer: Issue: The `%generate_buildrequires` is not available on EPEL8. It was introduced in Fedora 31 and therefore will be available only in EPEL9 and higher.

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
Resolution: Stop using dynamic `BuildRequires` for EPEL8 and lower. Instead, define all `BuildRequires` manually.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

+ %generate_buildrequires
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxlaKs: line 43: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxlaKs (%pre

Answer: The error message is very cryptic but `fg: no job control` usually means that an RPM macro is not defined.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/Documentation'
'/bin/sh' ./howto/howto-index.sh howto/coordinate-embargoed-releases.adoc howto/keep-canonical-history-correct.adoc howto/maintain-git.adoc howto/new-command.adoc howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.adoc howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.adoc howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.adoc howto/recover-corrupted-object-harder.adoc howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.adoc howto/revert-branch-rebase.adoc howto/separating-topic-branches.adoc howto/setup-git-server-over-http.adoc howto/update-hook-example.adoc howto/use-git-daemon.adoc howto/using-merge-subtree.adoc howto/using-signed-tag-in-pull-request.adoc >howto-index.adoc
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/Documentation'
make: *** [Makefile:2930: doc] Error 2]: [This snippet shows that the build has failed when trying to generate documentation.]


Answer: Issue: The build has failed because we were unable to generate a documentation. Most likely due to missing or incorrect build requires
Resolution: Add the correct build requires for generating documentation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/Documentation'
'/bin/sh' ./howto/howto-index.sh howto/coordinate-embargoed-releases.adoc howto/keep-canonical-history-correct.adoc howto/maintain-git.adoc howto/new-command.adoc howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.adoc howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.adoc howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.adoc howto/recover-corrupted-object-harder.adoc howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.adoc howto/revert-branch-rebase.adoc howto/separating-topic-branches.adoc howto/setup-git-server-over-http.adoc howto/update-hook-example.adoc howto/use-git-daemon.adoc howto/using-merge-subtree.adoc howto/using-signed-tag-in-pull-request.adoc >howto-index.adoc
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/Documentation'
make: *** [Makefile:2930: doc] Error 2

Answer: This snippet shows that the build has failed when trying to generate documentation.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR  Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: No source number 0]: [This line says while parsing specfile, no Source0 was found in that specfile]


Answer: Issue: The SRPM build submitted by Packit failed because there was no Source0 field in spec file.
Resolution: Specify Source0 in specfile
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR  Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: No source number 0

Answer: This line says while parsing specfile, no Source0 was found in that specfile
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ CC=clang]: [The default C compiler has been set to clang.]
=============
[+ CXX=clang++]: [The default C++ compiler has been set to clang++]
=============
[ocamlfind mklib -o mlnbd \
  -package unix -I . -I . \
  -ldopt '-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfg  -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,--build-id=sha1  ' \
  libnbdocaml_a-nbd-c.o libnbdocaml_a-buffer.o libnbdocaml_a-handle.o libnbdocaml_a-helpers.o  NBD.cmo \
  -L../lib/.libs -lnbd]: [The ocaml compiler is being used.]
=============
[gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfgâ
]: [This is the error that causes the build to fail.]


Answer: Issue: The ocaml package has been built with gcc, so it uses gcc as its linker driver.  However, since the default compiler for this RPM build has been set to clang.  gcc is being passed flags that are meant for clang and that it does not support.
Resolution: Rebuild the ocaml package with clang and then rebuild this package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ CC=clang

Answer: The default C compiler has been set to clang.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ CXX=clang++

Answer: The default C++ compiler has been set to clang++
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ocamlfind mklib -o mlnbd \
  -package unix -I . -I . \
  -ldopt '-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfg  -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,--build-id=sha1  ' \
  libnbdocaml_a-nbd-c.o libnbdocaml_a-buffer.o libnbdocaml_a-handle.o libnbdocaml_a-helpers.o  NBD.cmo \
  -L../lib/.libs -lnbd

Answer: The ocaml compiler is being used.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfgâ


Answer: This is the error that causes the build to fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /etc/grub.d/35_fwupd]: [There were installed but unpackaged files found.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because there were some files that were installed during the build but unpackaged. Either the file was not ignored in the %files section of the spec file or the file was not added in the %files section to be packaged.
Resolution: Update the %files section of the spec file to accommodate all the files created during the build process by either ignoring them or including them to be packaged or updating the %install part of the spec file to get rid of unwanted files.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /etc/grub.d/35_fwupd

Answer: There were installed but unpackaged files found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/qmlcompiler/qqmljsstorageinitializer.cpp.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/CMakeLists.txt.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/enumproblems.h.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/unknownUnderlyingType.qml.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/tst_qmlcppcodegen.cpp.rej]: [It's the build step that caused the build to fail.]


Answer: Issue: It failed to apply the patch during the build and failed.
Resolution: You have to either drop the patch in case it's already part of the release or rebase the patch to make sure it applies cleanly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/qmlcompiler/qqmljsstorageinitializer.cpp.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/CMakeLists.txt.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/enumproblems.h.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/unknownUnderlyingType.qml.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/tst_qmlcppcodegen.cpp.rej

Answer: It's the build step that caused the build to fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: Transaction test error:
  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.2.8.1-1.fc42.s390x conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.22.0-1.fc40.noarch
]: [File from one of the installed packages conflicts with file already present on the build system.]


Answer: Issue: File `/etc/dnf/dnf.conf`, which is provided by libdnf5 package, is also tracked as being provided by already installed `dnf-data` package. This causes irreconcilable conflict, leading to build failure.
Resolution: Ensure that no requested package conflicts with an already installed package. This will require manual revision of package dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Transaction test error:
  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.2.8.1-1.fc42.s390x conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.22.0-1.fc40.noarch


Answer: File from one of the installed packages conflicts with file already present on the build system.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [install: cannot stat '%{SOURCE20}': No such file or directory]: [shows wrong source file number]


Answer: Issue: the source file has wrong number
Resolution: check the source with the number exists
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
install: cannot stat '%{SOURCE20}': No such file or directory

Answer: shows wrong source file number
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [misc.c:61:98: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘)’ token
   61 | _PROTOTYPE(static int doinchild,(int (*fn)(char *, char *, int), char *fp, char *rbuf, int rbln)));
      |                                                                  ]: [Error report due to incorrect C code.]


Answer: Issue: Extra parenthesis in function definition.
Resolution: Enclose the function definition with correct number of parentheses.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
misc.c:61:98: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘)’ token
   61 | _PROTOTYPE(static int doinchild,(int (*fn)(char *, char *, int), char *fp, char *rbuf, int rbln)));
      |                                                                  

Answer: Error report due to incorrect C code.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [test cert::test::v6_minimal_cert ... FAILED]: [Test marked as FAILED in the test suite summary.]
=============
[failures:

---- cert::test::v6_minimal_cert stdout ----

thread 'cert::test::v6_minimal_cert' panicked at /usr/share/cargo/registry/argon2-0.5.3/src/lib.rs:230:26:
capacity overflow
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace


failures:
    cert::test::v6_minimal_cert]: [Detailed output for the failed test.]


Answer: Issue: A test failure in the "cert::test::v6_minimal_cert" test.
Resolution: Fix the failing test :)
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
test cert::test::v6_minimal_cert ... FAILED

Answer: Test marked as FAILED in the test suite summary.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
failures:

---- cert::test::v6_minimal_cert stdout ----

thread 'cert::test::v6_minimal_cert' panicked at /usr/share/cargo/registry/argon2-0.5.3/src/lib.rs:230:26:
capacity overflow
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace


failures:
    cert::test::v6_minimal_cert

Answer: Detailed output for the failed test.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG: error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory
DEBUG:     Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory]: [`/builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz` file was not found because it doesn't exist. Because it is located in the `/builddir/build/SOURCES` directory, this is one of the source files.]


Answer: Issue: pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz source file was not found.
Resolution: Make sure the file exists locally, or upload it to the build system - in Fedora, this is the lookaside cache, use `fedkpg upload pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz` and don't forget to commit the changes in the SOURCES file in dist-git.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG: error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory
DEBUG:     Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory

Answer: `/builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz` file was not found because it doesn't exist. Because it is located in the `/builddir/build/SOURCES` directory, this is one of the source files.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ mv /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-3.0.2 devel-docs
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-3.0.2': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1HZv08 (%install)]: [This is a build error]


Answer: Issue: The build process is trying to move directory that doesn't exist.
Resolution: The build command should be fixed so it points to directory that does exist or it should be removed all together.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ mv /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-3.0.2 devel-docs
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-3.0.2': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1HZv08 (%install)

Answer: This is a build error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CC=clang]: [clang is being used as the C compiler.]
=============
[CXX=clang++]: [clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler.]
=============
[checking whether the Fortran compiler works... no
configure: error: in '/builddir/build/BUILD/arpack-3.9.1-build/arpack-3.9.1/src':
configure: error: Fortran compiler cannot create executables
See 'config.log' for more details]: [This is the error message produced by the configuration script which has failed.]


Answer: Issue: The configure script failed because it is trying to use clang C/C++ flags with the gfortran compiler.  gfortran does not support all clang flags so the fortran detection fails.
Resolution: This needs to be fixed in Fedora redhat-rpm-config: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/250

You can work around this be manually specifying the FORTRAN flangs and ensure they are compatible with gfortran.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
checking whether the Fortran compiler works... no
configure: error: in '/builddir/build/BUILD/arpack-3.9.1-build/arpack-3.9.1/src':
configure: error: Fortran compiler cannot create executables
See 'config.log' for more details

Answer: This is the error message produced by the configuration script which has failed.