fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[WARNING] Ignoring metadata for artifact velocity:velocity:pom:SYSTEM as it has duplicate metadata
[WARNING] Ignoring metadata for artifact org.apache.velocity:velocity:pom:SYSTEM as it has duplicate metadata
]: [Warnings about ignored, duplicated metadata.]
=============
[[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] error: release version 1.8 not supported
]: [Compilation error from `javac` Java compiler. This error indicates that version 1.8 is not supported. ]
=============
[[INFO] 1 error
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] 
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Skipping Apache Maven Mapping
[INFO] This project has been banned from the build due to previous failures.
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time:  1.681 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2024-11-29T07:45:26Z
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------]: [General message about failed build, total runtime and that one error has been encountered.]
=============
[[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.12.1:compile (default-compile) on project maven-mapping: Compilation failure
[ERROR] error: release version 1.8 not supported
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException]: [Final report by `javac` about compilation failure. Specifying that build can be re-run with additional debug messages to allow for better diagnosis. 

The message also links to article with more information. ]


Answer: Issue: Build fail because `1.8` is not a valid value of the release attribute. JDK only allows major versions as  values of the `release` attribute.
Resolution: Change value of the `release` attribute to a fitting major version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[WARNING] Ignoring metadata for artifact velocity:velocity:pom:SYSTEM as it has duplicate metadata
[WARNING] Ignoring metadata for artifact org.apache.velocity:velocity:pom:SYSTEM as it has duplicate metadata


Answer: Warnings about ignored, duplicated metadata.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] error: release version 1.8 not supported


Answer: Compilation error from `javac` Java compiler. This error indicates that version 1.8 is not supported.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[INFO] 1 error
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] 
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Skipping Apache Maven Mapping
[INFO] This project has been banned from the build due to previous failures.
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time:  1.681 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2024-11-29T07:45:26Z
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Answer: General message about failed build, total runtime and that one error has been encountered.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.12.1:compile (default-compile) on project maven-mapping: Compilation failure
[ERROR] error: release version 1.8 not supported
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException

Answer: Final report by `javac` about compilation failure. Specifying that build can be re-run with additional debug messages to allow for better diagnosis. 

The message also links to article with more information.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ gdb --batch --command=test.gdb python3
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sfzGCC: line 62: gdb: command not found]: [This indicates that the gdb command is not found in the system's PATH.]


Answer: Issue: gdb debugger is used to analyze the python3 process. However, gdb is not available in the build environment.
Resolution: Ensure the gdb package is installed on the build system. Add it via BuildRequires into your specfile.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ gdb --batch --command=test.gdb python3
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sfzGCC: line 62: gdb: command not found

Answer: This indicates that the gdb command is not found in the system's PATH.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAIL test_scripts/encoded_verbatiminclude_names_latin1_html.sh (exit status: 1)]: [This snipped shows that the build failed because of failed test.]
=============
[FAIL test_scripts/encoded_verbatiminclude_names_latin1_html_explicit_encoding.sh (exit status: 1)]: [This snippet shows another failed test.]
=============
[See tp/tests/test-suite.log for debugging.
Some test(s) failed.  Please report this to bug-texinfo@gnu.org,
together with the test-suite.log file (gzipped) and your system
information.  Thanks.]: [This snippet shows why the build failed and suggest what to do now.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because some of the tests executed in %check section failed.
Resolution: See logs to pinpoint which tests failed and fix them or report the issue upstream. You can also temporarily disable the %check section to workaround the problem but be cautious about that as the package functionality may be affected.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL test_scripts/encoded_verbatiminclude_names_latin1_html.sh (exit status: 1)

Answer: This snipped shows that the build failed because of failed test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL test_scripts/encoded_verbatiminclude_names_latin1_html_explicit_encoding.sh (exit status: 1)

Answer: This snippet shows another failed test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
See tp/tests/test-suite.log for debugging.
Some test(s) failed.  Please report this to bug-texinfo@gnu.org,
together with the test-suite.log file (gzipped) and your system
information.  Thanks.

Answer: This snippet shows why the build failed and suggest what to do now.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [src/spss/readstat_por_write.c: In function 'por_emit_header':
src/spss/readstat_por_write.c:206:5: error: 'strncpy' output may be truncated copying 20 bytes from a string of length 256 [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
  206 |     strncpy(vanity[1] + 20, writer->file_label, 20);
      |     ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors]: [This snippet shows the GCC error which causes the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: The build has failed because of a GCC error.
Resolution: Preferably, work with the upstream code to produce a patch fixing the GCC error or add the appropriate CFLAGS to treat this error only as a warning.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
src/spss/readstat_por_write.c: In function 'por_emit_header':
src/spss/readstat_por_write.c:206:5: error: 'strncpy' output may be truncated copying 20 bytes from a string of length 256 [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
  206 |     strncpy(vanity[1] + 20, writer->file_label, 20);
      |     ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Answer: This snippet shows the GCC error which causes the build failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1712/1712 systemd:libsystemd / test-sd-device                               TIMEOUT         181.37s   killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>>> SYSTEMD_SLOW_TESTS=1 MALLOC_PERTURB_=211 PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-257.5-build/systemd-257.5/redhat-linux-build:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/sbin PROJECT_BUILD_ROOT=/builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-257.5-build/systemd-257.5/redhat-linux-build ASAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1 MESON_TEST_ITERATION=1 UBSAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1:print_stacktrace=1 SYSTEMD_LANGUAGE_FALLBACK_MAP=/builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-257.5-build/systemd-257.5/src/locale/language-fallback-map EFI_ADDON=/builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-257.5-build/systemd-257.5/redhat-linux-build/src/boot/addonaa64.efi.stub MSAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1:print_stacktrace=1 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-257.5-build/systemd-257.5/redhat-linux-build/src/shared PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 /builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-257.5-build/systemd-257.5/redhat-linux-build/test-sd-device
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ✀  ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
stderr:
/* test_devname_from_devnum */
/* test_sd_device_new_from_path */
/* test_sd_device_new_from_nulstr */
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-partuuid/1290d63a-42cc-4c71-b87c-xxxxxxxxxxxx
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:0f.0-scsi-0:0:0:0-part3
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-label/Arch\x20Linux
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-uuid/a07b87e5-4af5-4a59-bde9-yyyyyyyyyyyy
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Arch\x20Linux
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-partuuid/1290d63a-42cc-4c71-b87c-xxxxxxxxxxxx
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:0f.0-scsi-0:0:0:0-part3
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-label/Arch\x20Linux
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-uuid/a07b87e5-4af5-4a59-bde9-yyyyyyyyyyyy
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Arch\x20Linux
/* test_sd_device_get_child */
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
Summary of Failures:
1712/1712 systemd:libsystemd / test-sd-device                               TIMEOUT         181.37s   killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
Ok:                 1679
Expected Fail:      0   
Fail:               0   
Unexpected Pass:    0   
Skipped:            32  
Timeout:            1   
Full log written to /builddir/build/BUILD/systemd-257.5-build/systemd-257.5/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/testlog.txt
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PhFrd9 (%check)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PhFrd9 (%check)

Answer: The build failed in the %check phase due to a timeout in a test.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [flist.c: In function ‘recv_file_list’:
flist.c:2787:55: warning: cast between incompatible function types from ‘int (*)(struct file_struct **, struct file_struct **)’ to ‘int (*)(void)’ [-Wcast-function-type]
 2787 |                       sizeof the_fattr_list.files[0], (int (*)())fattr_compare);
      |                                                       ^
flist.c:2787:55: error: passing argument 4 of ‘qsort’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
 2787 |                       sizeof the_fattr_list.files[0], (int (*)())fattr_compare);
      |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                       |
      |                                                       int (*)(void)]: [The snippet shows current code that started to fail with the new GCC15 in Rawhide.]


Answer: Issue: Partially defined int prototype int(*)() are now int (*)(void) and these need to be explicitly defined.
Resolution: In this particular case, the function needs to be used like this: sizeof the_fattr_list.files[0], (int (*)(const void *, const void *))fattr_compare);
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
flist.c: In function ‘recv_file_list’:
flist.c:2787:55: warning: cast between incompatible function types from ‘int (*)(struct file_struct **, struct file_struct **)’ to ‘int (*)(void)’ [-Wcast-function-type]
 2787 |                       sizeof the_fattr_list.files[0], (int (*)())fattr_compare);
      |                                                       ^
flist.c:2787:55: error: passing argument 4 of ‘qsort’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
 2787 |                       sizeof the_fattr_list.files[0], (int (*)())fattr_compare);
      |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                       |
      |                                                       int (*)(void)

Answer: The snippet shows current code that started to fail with the new GCC15 in Rawhide.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
The text leading up to this was:]: [This snippet shows why the build has failed. There are no files to patch.]


Answer: Issue: Because of a missing %gometa macro in the spec file, which sets the correct variables needed for the golang packages to build properly.
Resolution: Add the %gometa macro and it's requirements to the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
The text leading up to this was:

Answer: This snippet shows why the build has failed. There are no files to patch.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ echo 'Patch #2 (varnish-6.6.1-CVE-2025-47905.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 --fuzz=0
patching file bin/varnishd/http1/cache_http1_vfp.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 91.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 170.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 224.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 255.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bin/varnishd/http1/cache_http1_vfp.c.rej]: [It's a root cause why the build is failing - patch was not correctly applied. ]


Answer: Issue: The build failed, because the patch was not correctly applied. 
Resolution: Rebase the patch to the current varnish version so it is cleanly applied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ echo 'Patch #2 (varnish-6.6.1-CVE-2025-47905.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 --fuzz=0
patching file bin/varnishd/http1/cache_http1_vfp.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 91.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 170.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 224.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 255.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bin/varnishd/http1/cache_http1_vfp.c.rej

Answer: It's a root cause why the build is failing - patch was not correctly applied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/command/sdist.py:121: SetuptoolsDeprecationWarning: `build_py` command does not inherit from setuptools' `build_py`.
!!

        ********************************************************************************
        Custom 'build_py' does not implement 'get_data_files_without_manifest'.
        Please extend command classes from setuptools instead of distutils.

        See https://peps.python.org/pep-0632/ for details.
        ********************************************************************************

!!

Answer: The `build_py` in this project seems to be customized or outdated because it does not inherit the `build_py` command from the `setuptools` package. Please  take a look on your project if `build_py` have correct inheritance.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.16.3-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-devel-3.13.0-1.fc42.x86_64" is already installed.
No match for argument: python3dist(chromadb) >= 0.4
No match for argument: python3dist(cryptography) >= 43.0.1
No match for argument: python3dist(evaluate) >= 0.4.1
No match for argument: python3dist(httpx) = 0.27
No match for argument: python3dist(litestar) >= 2.8.3
No match for argument: python3dist(mypy) = 1.1.1
No match for argument: python3dist(openai) >= 1.16.2
Package "python3-packaging-24.2-2.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
No match for argument: python3dist(pandas-stubs) >= 1.3.5
No match for argument: python3dist(pandas[parquet]) >= 1.3.5
No match for argument: python3dist(pillow) = 10.3
Package "python3-pip-24.3.1-1.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
No match for argument: python3dist(pip-audit) >= 2.7.2
No match for argument: python3dist(pre-commit) = 3.5
No match for argument: python3dist(pyspark) >= 3.4
No match for argument: python3dist(pytest) = 7.4.4
No match for argument: python3dist(pytest-asyncio) = 0.23.7
No match for argument: python3dist(ruff) = 0.3.7
No match for argument: python3dist(s3fs) >= 2024.9
No match for argument: python3dist(sentence-transformers) >= 2.7
No match for argument: python3dist(setuptools) = 68.2.2
Package "python3-setuptools-74.1.3-4.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
No match for argument: python3dist(sqlvalidator) >= 0.0.20
No match for argument: python3dist(transformers) >= 4.39.3
No match for argument: python3dist(transformers[torch]) >= 4.39.3
No match for argument: python3dist(types-dataclasses) = 0.6
No match for argument: python3dist(types-python-dateutil) = 2.8.19
No match for argument: python3dist(types-requests) = 2.26
No match for argument: python3dist(types-ujson) >= 5.4
No match for argument: python3dist(uuid6) >= 2024.7.10
No match for argument: python3dist(wheel) = 0.38.1

Answer: RPM transaction can't be resolved because there are many python packages requested which are not available in requested version or not available at all.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-dynaconf-3.2.4-1.fc40.noarch from copr_base
 Problem 2: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python3.11dist(requests) needed by python3-iterative-telemetry-0.0.8-1.fc39.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.11dist(filelock) needed by python3-iterative-telemetry-0.0.8-1.fc39.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-iterative-telemetry-0.0.8-1.fc39.noarch from copr_base
 Problem 3: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python3.11dist(ipywidgets) needed by python3-jupyter-1.0.0-1.fc37.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-jupyter-1.0.0-1.fc37.noarch from copr_base
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages

Answer: The DNF installation has failed because packages requested by other packages are not available.

Precisely:
- python in version 3.12 is requested by python3-dynaconf from the copr_base repository
- requests and filelock python packages are requested by the python3-iterative-telemetry package from the copr_base repository
- ipywidgets and python 3.11 is requested by python3-jupyter package from the copr_base repository
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py test
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'test_suite'
  warnings.warn(msg)
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:655: SetuptoolsDeprecationWarning: The namespace_packages parameter is deprecated.
!!
        ********************************************************************************
        Please replace its usage with implicit namespaces (PEP 420).
        See https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/references/keywords.html#keyword-namespace-packages for details.
        ********************************************************************************
!!
  ep.load()(self, ep.name, value)]: [This snipped shows the warning which relates to the build failure.]
=============
[error: invalid command 'test'
]: [This snippet shows why the build has failed.]


Answer: Issue: The build has failed because `setup.py test`is an invalid command.
Resolution: Use the proper test runner to run the tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py test
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'test_suite'
  warnings.warn(msg)
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:655: SetuptoolsDeprecationWarning: The namespace_packages parameter is deprecated.
!!
        ********************************************************************************
        Please replace its usage with implicit namespaces (PEP 420).
        See https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/references/keywords.html#keyword-namespace-packages for details.
        ********************************************************************************
!!
  ep.load()(self, ep.name, value)

Answer: This snipped shows the warning which relates to the build failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: invalid command 'test'


Answer: This snippet shows why the build has failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'eln-baseos': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tri]: [Repository 'eln-baseos' cannot be downloaded.]
=============
[
  - Status code: 403 for https://odcs.fedoraproject.org/composes/production/latest-Fedora-ELN/compose/BaseOS/aarch64/os/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 8.43.85.6]: [Fedora ELN compose repository cannot be downloaded because of 403 error.]


Answer: Issue: Network error occured; repository metadata could not be downloaded.
Resolution: Restart the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'eln-baseos': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tri

Answer: Repository 'eln-baseos' cannot be downloaded.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

  - Status code: 403 for https://odcs.fedoraproject.org/composes/production/latest-Fedora-ELN/compose/BaseOS/aarch64/os/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 8.43.85.6

Answer: Fedora ELN compose repository cannot be downloaded because of 403 error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [install: target '/builddir/build/BUILD/pioneer-20250501-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/pioneer/': No such file or directory]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: install program tries to copy files into destination that doesn't exist.
Resolution: Create the target directory before running `install`. Add `mkdir -p ...` before the failing `install` in %install section of SPEC file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
install: target '/builddir/build/BUILD/pioneer-20250501-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/pioneer/': No such file or directory

Answer: Error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [meson.build:398:2: ERROR: Dependency "babl" not found, tried pkgconfig]: [It is a first error in the log describing what happened about missing dependency.]


Answer: Issue: The babl dependency is not found.
Resolution: Provide babl dependency for the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meson.build:398:2: ERROR: Dependency "babl" not found, tried pkgconfig

Answer: It is a first error in the log describing what happened about missing dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/cups/usb/org.cups.usb-quirks
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/cups/usb/org.cups.usb-quirks]: [Contains bug.]


Answer: Issue: The file org.cups.usb-quirks was installed into %{buildroot} during the %install stage but not included in the %files section of the .spec file — causing rpmbuild to reject the build.
Resolution: Decide if you want to distribute those files. If not don't add them to %install section. Otherwise: add it explicitly to the %files section
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/cups/usb/org.cups.usb-quirks
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/cups/usb/org.cups.usb-quirks

Answer: Contains bug.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn]: [/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn command failed.]
=============
[No match for argument: python3-rjsmin
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
]: [Unable to find package python3-rjsmin]


Answer: Issue: Build Failed because the command '/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn' failed because python3-rjsmin package was missing
Resolution: python3-rjsmin package is available to install.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn

Answer: /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn command failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3-rjsmin
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages


Answer: Unable to find package python3-rjsmin
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_util.py::TestSanityCheckRepodata::test_correct_yum_repo_with_xz_compress
FAILED tests/test_util.py::TestSanityCheckRepodata::test_correct_yum_repo_with_gz_compress
FAILED tests/test_util.py::TestSanityCheckRepodata::test_correct_yum_repo_with_bz2_compress
FAILED tests/test_util.py::TestSanityCheckRepodata::test_correct_yum_repo_with_zstd_compress
FAILED tests/test_util.py::TestSanityCheckRepodata::test_repomd_drpms_disabled
FAILED tests/test_util.py::TestSanityCheckRepodata::test_source_true - subpro...
FAILED tests/tasks/test_composer.py::TestComposer::test_sanity_check_valid - ...
FAILED tests/tasks/test_composer.py::TestComposer::test_sanity_check_symlink
FAILED tests/tasks/test_composer.py::TestComposer::test_sanity_check_directories_missing
===== 9 failed, 1711 passed, 1 skipped, 1558 warnings in 208.79s (0:03:28) =====
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XzGcft (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XzGcft (%check)

Answer: Summary of failed tests.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [configure.ac:74: warning: macro 'AM_ICONV' not found in library
autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force
configure.ac:10: warning: The macro 'AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is obsolete.
configure.ac:10: You should run autoupdate.
m4/libtool.m4:100: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is expanded from...
configure.ac:10: the top level
configure.ac:74: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_ICONV
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.]: [Error messages from autoconf tool]


Answer: Issue: A used macro AM_ICONV is undefined
Resolution: AM_ICONV is related to gettext library, check it is installed on builder or by the script and it is in the correct version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
configure.ac:74: warning: macro 'AM_ICONV' not found in library
autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force
configure.ac:10: warning: The macro 'AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is obsolete.
configure.ac:10: You should run autoupdate.
m4/libtool.m4:100: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is expanded from...
configure.ac:10: the top level
configure.ac:74: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_ICONV
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.

Answer: Error messages from autoconf tool
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc -Isystemd-hostnamed.p -I. -I.. -Isrc/basic -I../src/basic -Isrc/fundamental -I../src/fundamental -Isrc/systemd -I../src/systemd -I../src/libsystemd/sd-bus -I../src/libsystemd/sd-device -I../src/libsystemd/sd-event -I../src/libsystemd/sd-hwdb -I../src/libsystemd/sd-id128 -I../src/libsystemd/sd-journal -I../src/libsystemd/sd-json -I../src/libsystemd/sd-netlink -I../src/libsystemd/sd-network -I../src/libsystemd/sd-path -I../src/libsystemd/sd-resolve -I../src/libsystemd/sd-varlink -Isrc/shared -I../src/shared -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -Werror -std=gnu11 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-nonnull-compare -Warray-bounds -Warray-bounds=2 -Wdate-time -Wendif-labels -Werror=format=2 -Werror=format-signedness -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=int-conversion -Werror=missing-declarations -Werror=missing-prototypes -Werror=overflow -Werror=override-init -Werror=return-type -Werror=shift-count-overflow -Werror=shift-overflow=2 -Werror=strict-flex-arrays -Werror=undef -Wfloat-equal -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 -Winit-self -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wmissing-noreturn -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn -Wunused-function -Wwrite-strings -Wzero-length-bounds -fdiagnostics-show-option -fno-common -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-strong -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-unused-result -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -Werror=shadow -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -mbranch-protection=standard -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fno-strict-aliasing -fstrict-flex-arrays=1 -fvisibility=hidden -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -include config.h -MD -MQ systemd-hostnamed.p/src_hostname_hostnamed.c.o -MF systemd-hostnamed.p/src_hostname_hostnamed.c.o.d -o systemd-hostnamed.p/src_hostname_hostnamed.c.o -c ../src/hostname/hostnamed.c
../src/hostname/hostnamed.c: In function âget_chassis_asset_tagâ:
../src/hostname/hostnamed.c:297:16: error: implicit declaration of function âget_dmi_propertyâ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  297 |         return get_dmi_property(c, "ID_CHASSIS_ASSET_TAG", ret);
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/hostname/hostnamed.c:297:16: error: nested extern declaration of âget_dmi_propertyâ [-Werror=nested-externs]

Answer: Function get_dmi_property is not declared causing compilation failure
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [meson.build:1:0: ERROR: Unknown options: "js_engine"]: [Error reported due to wrong configuration.]


Answer: Issue: polkit switched dependency from mozjs to duktape, but the configuration in %build phase in spec file was left unchanged.
Resolution: Modify the configuration line by reflecting the dependency or remove it completely if possible.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meson.build:1:0: ERROR: Unknown options: "js_engine"

Answer: Error reported due to wrong configuration.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [package python3-django-5.1.8-1.fc43.noarch from fedora conflicts with python-django-impl provided by python3-django4.2-4.2.20-1.fc43.noarch from fedora]: [The error message]
=============
[conflicting requests]: [General error message]


Answer: Issue: There are conflicting packages in Fedora related to Django
Resolution: Remove the conflicting package from the buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
package python3-django-5.1.8-1.fc43.noarch from fedora conflicts with python-django-impl provided by python3-django4.2-4.2.20-1.fc43.noarch from fedora

Answer: The error message
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
conflicting requests

Answer: General error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: %changelog not in descending chronological order
]: [important error during rmp build]


Answer: Issue: Changelog not in descending chronological order
Resolution: Data in changelog needs to be ordered chronologically
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: %changelog not in descending chronological order


Answer: important error during rmp build
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun]: [Explains that the error happened when installing dependencies because some dependencies could not be installed.]
=============
[
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(setuptools) >= 64'
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(setuptools-scm) >= ]: [Describes exactly which packages failed to be installed.]


Answer: Issue: Some dependencies failed to be installed.
Resolution: Review if the enabled repositories contain required packages
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun

Answer: Explains that the error happened when installing dependencies because some dependencies could not be installed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3dist(setuptools) >= 64'
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(setuptools-scm) >= 

Answer: Describes exactly which packages failed to be installed.