fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ ruby -Ilib test/test_async.rb
test/test_async.rb:28:in `<main>': uninitialized constant MiniTest (NameError)

class TestSinatraAsync < MiniTest::Unit::TestCase
                         ^^^^^^^^
Did you mean?  Minitest
]: [File and Line: The error originated in the file test/test_async.rb on line 28.
Uninitialized Constant: The Ruby interpreter encountered a reference to the MiniTest constant, but it wasn't defined. This means the necessary library or gem isn't included in the build environment.
Missing Dependency: The MiniTest library is a popular testing framework for Ruby. Its absence suggests that the gem's dependencies aren't correctly configured or aren't available during the build process.]


Answer: Issue: The error message also provides a helpful suggestion: "Did you mean? Minitest". This indicates that the interpreter thinks you might have meant Minitest instead of MiniTest::Unit::TestCase. While the latter is a more specific class, it's often used within the context of Minitest.
Resolution: Check Gemfile:
Ensure that minitest is listed as a dependency in the Gemfile.
Verify that the Gemfile is correctly configured to include necessary dependencies.
Verify Ruby Version:
Check if the Ruby version used for the build is compatible with the minitest gem and its dependencies.
Inspect Test File:
Review the code in test/test_async.rb to ensure that MiniTest is being used correctly and that there are no other issues.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ ruby -Ilib test/test_async.rb
test/test_async.rb:28:in `<main>': uninitialized constant MiniTest (NameError)

class TestSinatraAsync < MiniTest::Unit::TestCase
                         ^^^^^^^^
Did you mean?  Minitest


Answer: File and Line: The error originated in the file test/test_async.rb on line 28.
Uninitialized Constant: The Ruby interpreter encountered a reference to the MiniTest constant, but it wasn't defined. This means the necessary library or gem isn't included in the build environment.
Missing Dependency: The MiniTest library is a popular testing framework for Ruby. Its absence suggests that the gem's dependencies aren't correctly configured or aren't available during the build process.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VRb5bZ (%build)]: [build has problem in the build section]
=============
[meas.c:441:25: error: passing argument 2 of ‘signal’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  441 |         signal(SIGQUIT, sigterm);
      |                         ^~~~~~~
      |                         |
      |                         void (*)(void)]: [The ultimate information why it failed ]


Answer: Issue: API of the function signal has changed 
Resolution: pass compatible pointer type into signal function in downstream patch or contact upstream
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VRb5bZ (%build)

Answer: build has problem in the build section
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
meas.c:441:25: error: passing argument 2 of ‘signal’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  441 |         signal(SIGQUIT, sigterm);
      |                         ^~~~~~~
      |                         |
      |                         void (*)(void)

Answer: The ultimate information why it failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/customizations/cloudtrail/test_validation.py.rej
]: [This is the output of the patch command. It indicates that it failed.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3GevrQ (%prep)]: [This is a line from rpmbuild that indicates that the build failed during %prep section execution.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because (at least) one of the patches failed to be applied.
Resolution: It is necessary to examine the patch that failed to apply and fix it - in this case the changes have been already applied upstream so the patch could be simply removed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/unit/customizations/cloudtrail/test_validation.py.rej


Answer: This is the output of the patch command. It indicates that it failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3GevrQ (%prep)

Answer: This is a line from rpmbuild that indicates that the build failed during %prep section execution.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ cp -u '/home/testuser/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/*' /home/testuser/rpmbuild/SOURCES/rpm/
  cp: cannot stat '/home/testuser/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/*': No such file or directory]: [Contains main issue]


Answer: Issue: Missing noarch settings.
Resolution: BuildArch: noarch
in rpmspec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ cp -u '/home/testuser/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/*' /home/testuser/rpmbuild/SOURCES/rpm/
  cp: cannot stat '/home/testuser/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/*': No such file or directory

Answer: Contains main issue
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconf]: [Unmet dependency "systemd".]
=============
[
Did not find CMake 'cmake'
Found CMake: N]: [Unmet dependency "cmake".]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to multiple unmet dependencies. 
Resolution: Include "cmake" and "systemd" packages in list of packages to install.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 Dependency "systemd" not found, tried pkgconf

Answer: Unmet dependency "systemd".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Did not find CMake 'cmake'
Found CMake: N

Answer: Unmet dependency "cmake".
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/miniupnpc-2.3.3-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.20
]: [The relevant error message saying that the '/usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.20' file has not been found in the buildroot.]
=============
[-Wl,-soname,libminiupnpc.so.21]: [The relevant build recipe snippet instructing linker to use the 'libminiupnpc.so.21' soname.]


Answer: Issue: The file specified in the spec file was not found due to soname version bump.
Resolution: Fix the spec file '%files' section and change the version of the 'libminiupnpc.so' library.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/miniupnpc-2.3.3-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.20


Answer: The relevant error message saying that the '/usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.20' file has not been found in the buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
-Wl,-soname,libminiupnpc.so.21

Answer: The relevant build recipe snippet instructing linker to use the 'libminiupnpc.so.21' soname.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [EBUG util.py:459:  No matching package to install: 'iniparser-devel'
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package rpm-4.19.1.1-12.el10.x86_64 is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package sed-4.9-3.el10.x86_64 is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:459:  Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [Some build dependency hasn't been found.]


Answer: Issue: The iniparser-devel package is listed in the spec file as required for the build, but it can't be found the repository.
Resolution: Because this is a build for EPEL and the iniparser package is part of RHEL it is required to open a ticket for RHEL to make the iniparser-devel subpackage publicly available for builds.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
EBUG util.py:459:  No matching package to install: 'iniparser-devel'
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package rpm-4.19.1.1-12.el10.x86_64 is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package sed-4.9-3.el10.x86_64 is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:459:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:459:  Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: Some build dependency hasn't been found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ Librepo error: Cannot download toplink/packages/pcp/6.3.2/5.fc42/x86_64/pcp-pmda-dbping-6.3.2-5.fc42.x86_64.rpm: All mirrors were tried]: [Failed download of a package.]


Answer: Issue: DNF can not download a package.
Resolution: Check in Koji if the build contains the package which DNF failed to download. If the package is in the build, then restart the test as it was probably caused by a temporary glitch of a network.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 Librepo error: Cannot download toplink/packages/pcp/6.3.2/5.fc42/x86_64/pcp-pmda-dbping-6.3.2-5.fc42.x86_64.rpm: All mirrors were tried

Answer: Failed download of a package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun

Answer: shows the dnf error
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-deve

Answer: package cannot be installed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                                  64 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Package findutils-1:4.8.0-2.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                                  66 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Package findutils-1:4.8.0-2.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
No matching package to install: 'gdm-pam-extensions-devel'
Package krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.amzn2023.x86_64 is already installed.
Package libxml2-2.10.4-1.amzn2023.0.6.x86_64 is already installed.
Package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.8.0-4.amzn2023.0.2.x86_64 is already installed.
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.
Finish: build setup for sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/sssd-2.9.4-3.amzn2023.src.rpm) Config(amazonlinux-2023-x86_64) 0 minutes 23 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M eaa0c5d8c4ee49bb9b089861cde90da7 -D /var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-bootstrap-1710356556.638268/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.yjyaseyk:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/amazonlinux-2023-x86_64-1710356556.638268/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' 

Answer: cannot install those packages
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ mv '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-%{bin_version}' devel-docs
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-%{bin_version}': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JczlzD (%install)]: [Build failure reason.]


Answer: Issue: RPM local variable %{bin_version} is not defined.
Resolution: Take a look at your .spec file and define all locally created variables.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 mv '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-%{bin_version}' devel-docs
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-%{bin_version}': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JczlzD (%install)

Answer: Build failure reason.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file test/unit/common.hpp.rej
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp b/test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp
|index daa0ccb9..17c10378 100644
|--- a/test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp
|+++ b/test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored]: [Attached patch tries to modify a file test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp which does not exist in the source tree. ]


Answer: Issue: Build failed in prepare phase because one of attached patches does not match source code. The most probably that patch is for different version of the source code.
Resolution: Affected patch has to be inspected against the current source code and decide if it is still needed, updated for current version of the source code or removed if it is no more valid.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file test/unit/common.hpp.rej
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp b/test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp
|index daa0ccb9..17c10378 100644
|--- a/test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp
|+++ b/test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Answer: Attached patch tries to modify a file test/unit/test_event_queue.cpp which does not exist in the source tree.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [<string>:6: DeprecationWarning: pkg_resources is deprecated as an API. See https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/pkg_resources.html]: [Deprecation warning for `pkg_resources`, specifying that the API in question is deprecated and linking to more information.]
=============
[Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 730, in main
    generate_requires(
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
        include_runtime=args.runtime,
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ...<11 lines>...
        config_settings=parse_config_settings_args(args.config_settings),
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    )
    ^]: [Beginning of traceback for error encountered during build requirements generation. ]
=============
[FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'git']: [Error triggering build failure and traceback. The `git` file was not found at given path. 
This indicates that git package isn't installed. ]


Answer: Issue: Git wasn't installed on the build system, causing failure during requirements generation
Resolution: Ensure that git is installed on the system before build is initialized.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
<string>:6: DeprecationWarning: pkg_resources is deprecated as an API. See https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/pkg_resources.html

Answer: Deprecation warning for `pkg_resources`, specifying that the API in question is deprecated and linking to more information.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 730, in main
    generate_requires(
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
        include_runtime=args.runtime,
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ...<11 lines>...
        config_settings=parse_config_settings_args(args.config_settings),
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    )
    ^

Answer: Beginning of traceback for error encountered during build requirements generation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'git'

Answer: Error triggering build failure and traceback. The `git` file was not found at given path. 
This indicates that git package isn't installed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/python3 -sP /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f /builddir/build/BUILD/tmt-1.50.0-build/tmt-1.50.0-2.fc43.noarch-pyproject-modules
Check import: tmt
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 171, in <module>
    main()
    ~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 167, in main
    import_modules(modules)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 100, in import_modules
    importlib.import_module(module)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.14/importlib/__init__.py", line 88, in import_module
    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1398, in _gcd_import
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1371, in _find_and_load
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1342, in _find_and_load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 938, in _load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 762, in exec_module
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 491, in _call_with_frames_removed
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/tmt-1.50.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tmt/__init__.py", line 23, in <module>
    from tmt.base import Clean, Plan, Run, Status, Story, Test, Tree
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/tmt-1.50.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tmt/base.py", line 43, in <module>
    import tmt.config
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/tmt-1.50.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tmt/config/__init__.py", line 15, in <module>
    from tmt.config.models.themes import Theme, ThemeConfig
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/tmt-1.50.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tmt/config/models/themes.py", line 14, in <module>
    class Style(MetadataContainer):
    ...<18 lines>...
            return _style(text, **self.dict())
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pydantic/v1/main.py", line 221, in __new__
    inferred = ModelField.infer(
        name=var_name,
    ...<3 lines>...
        config=config,
    )
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pydantic/v1/fields.py", line 504, in infer
    return cls(
        name=name,
    ...<7 lines>...
        field_info=field_info,
    )
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pydantic/v1/fields.py", line 434, in __init__
    self.prepare()
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pydantic/v1/fields.py", line 544, in prepare
    self._set_default_and_type()
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pydantic/v1/fields.py", line 576, in _set_default_and_type
    raise errors_.ConfigError(f'unable to infer type for attribute "{self.name}"')
pydantic.v1.errors.ConfigError: unable to infer type for attribute "fg"

Answer: python traceback
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1C134u (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1C134u (%build)
]: [The build failed during `%build` phase.]
=============
[CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
  Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
    "/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
  in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES.  Possible reasons include:
  * The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
  * An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
  * The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
  provide.
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
  Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
    "/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
  in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES.  Possible reasons include:
  * The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
  * An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
  * The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
  provide.]: [The build expects QT library included, but it is not present.]


Answer: Issue: The build requires qtbase-private devel files, but it is not specified as BuildRequires.
Resolution: The solution is to add

```
BuildRequires: qt6-qtbase-private-devel
```
to the SPEC file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1C134u (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1C134u (%build)


Answer: The build failed during `%build` phase.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
  Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
    "/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
  in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES.  Possible reasons include:
  * The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
  * An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
  * The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
  provide.
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
  Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
    "/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
  in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES.  Possible reasons include:
  * The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
  * An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
  * The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
  provide.

Answer: The build expects QT library included, but it is not present.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/superqt/utils/_img_utils.py.rej]: [This line shows that a patch in the spec file is failing to apply.]


Answer: Issue: The patch being applied is based on an upstream pull request that is already included in this version of the software.
Resolution: Remove the redundant patch from the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/superqt/utils/_img_utils.py.rej

Answer: This line shows that a patch in the spec file is failing to apply.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
tests/test_qpainterpathprivate.py F/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2MsRCY: line 55:  3635 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-${RPM_LD_FLAGS}}" PATH="/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyqtgraph-0.13.3-5.fc40.i386/usr/bin:$PATH" PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH:-/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyqtgraph-0.13.3-5.fc40.i386/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages:/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyqtgraph-0.13.3-5.fc40.i386/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages}" PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 PYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS=4 /usr/bin/pytest -k "not (test_reload or test_PolyLineROI]: [Line reports segmentation fault caused by python test file during text execution.]


Answer: Issue: In file `tests/test_qpainterpathprivate.py` on line 55, the test suite encountered code causing segmentation error.

This can be caused either by issue in compiled code of built-in python libraries or, more probably, by improper memory handling in the test module or library itself.
Resolution: Locate compiled code invoked by test suite on line 55 of  `tests/test_qpainterpathprivate.py` and resolve the memory violation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

tests/test_qpainterpathprivate.py F/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2MsRCY: line 55:  3635 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-${RPM_LD_FLAGS}}" PATH="/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyqtgraph-0.13.3-5.fc40.i386/usr/bin:$PATH" PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH:-/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyqtgraph-0.13.3-5.fc40.i386/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages:/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyqtgraph-0.13.3-5.fc40.i386/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages}" PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 PYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS=4 /usr/bin/pytest -k "not (test_reload or test_PolyLineROI

Answer: Line reports segmentation fault caused by python test file during text execution.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [============================================================================
Testsuite summary for sssd 2.11.0
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 99
# PASS:  96
# SKIP:  2
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0]: [The testsuite summary with one failed test.]
=============
[FAIL: test_iobuf
================

[==========] tests: Running 3 test(s).
[ RUN      ] test_sss_iobuf_read
[       OK ] test_sss_iobuf_read
[ RUN      ] test_sss_iobuf_write
[       OK ] test_sss_iobuf_write
[ RUN      ] test_sss_iobuf_secure
[  ERROR   ] --- 0xffffffffffffffff == 0xffffffffffffffff
[   LINE   ] --- src/tests/cmocka/test_iobuf.c:134: error: Failure!
[  FAILED  ] test_sss_iobuf_secure
[==========] tests: 3 test(s) run.
[  PASSED  ] 2 test(s).
[  FAILED  ] tests: 1 test(s), listed below:
[  FAILED  ] test_sss_iobuf_secure

 1 FAILED TEST(S)
FAIL test_iobuf (exit status: 1)
]: [The log of the failed test.]
=============
[FAIL: test_iobuf]: [Name of the failed test.]


Answer: Issue: The testsuite failed.
Resolution: Analyse the test failure.  If unsure, try contacting upstream for additional assistance.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for sssd 2.11.0
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 99
# PASS:  96
# SKIP:  2
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

Answer: The testsuite summary with one failed test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: test_iobuf
================

[==========] tests: Running 3 test(s).
[ RUN      ] test_sss_iobuf_read
[       OK ] test_sss_iobuf_read
[ RUN      ] test_sss_iobuf_write
[       OK ] test_sss_iobuf_write
[ RUN      ] test_sss_iobuf_secure
[  ERROR   ] --- 0xffffffffffffffff == 0xffffffffffffffff
[   LINE   ] --- src/tests/cmocka/test_iobuf.c:134: error: Failure!
[  FAILED  ] test_sss_iobuf_secure
[==========] tests: 3 test(s) run.
[  PASSED  ] 2 test(s).
[  FAILED  ] tests: 1 test(s), listed below:
[  FAILED  ] test_sss_iobuf_secure

 1 FAILED TEST(S)
FAIL test_iobuf (exit status: 1)


Answer: The log of the failed test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: test_iobuf

Answer: Name of the failed test.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [  Running scriptlet: java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1:1.8.0.402.b06-1.el7_9.   1/1 
error: lua script failed: /var/lib/rpm-state//copy_jdk_configs.lua:39: attempt to index a nil value (global 'arg')

Error in PRETRANS scriptlet in rpm package java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless
]: [lua script fails, then openjdk is not properly installed]
=============
[ ant -Dant.java.version=1.8 prepare-dist
Error: could not find libjava.so
Error: Could not find Java SE Runtime Environment.]: [ant fails to load libjava.so]


Answer: Issue: For some reason openjdk is not properly installed.

Note that same source RPM build succeeds on build.opensuse.org for same EPEL 7 package
Resolution: No idea, fails on COPR, working fine on build.opensuse.org
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  Running scriptlet: java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1:1.8.0.402.b06-1.el7_9.   1/1 
error: lua script failed: /var/lib/rpm-state//copy_jdk_configs.lua:39: attempt to index a nil value (global 'arg')

Error in PRETRANS scriptlet in rpm package java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless


Answer: lua script fails, then openjdk is not properly installed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 ant -Dant.java.version=1.8 prepare-dist
Error: could not find libjava.so
Error: Could not find Java SE Runtime Environment.

Answer: ant fails to load libjava.so
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Requirement satisfied: cython>=0.29.24; platform_python_implementation == 'CPython'
   (installed: cython 3.0.12)

Answer: cython seems installed and available
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Cannot load externalized builtin: "internal/deps/cjs-module-lexer/lexer:/usr/lib/node_modules_24/cjs-module-lexer/lexer.js".
----- Native stack trace -----

 1: 0x7f367494f621 node::builtins::BuiltinLoader::AddExternalizedBuiltin(char const*, char const*) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 2: 0x7f367494f80f node::builtins::BuiltinLoader::BuiltinLoader() [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 3: 0x7f367488bc30 node::InitializePrimordials(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 4: 0x7f367488bd70 node::GetPerContextExports(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 5: 0x7f367488bb48 node::InitializePrimordials(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 6: 0x7f367488be50 node::InitializeMainContextForSnapshot(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 7: 0x7f367488be75 node::InitializeContext(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 8: 0x7f367488beeb node::NewContext(v8::Isolate*, v8::Local<v8::ObjectTemplate>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 9: 0x7f36749d4174 node::NodeMainInstance::CreateMainEnvironment(node::ExitCode*) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
10: 0x7f36749d42c2 node::NodeMainInstance::Run() [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
11: 0x7f367492f047 node::Start(int, char**) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
12: 0x7f367455b5f5  [/lib64/libc.so.6]
13: 0x7f367455b6a8 __libc_start_main [/lib64/libc.so.6]
14: 0x565154ff2035 _start [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT//usr/bin/node-24]
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4HMIzZ: line 48: 35941 Aborted                 (core dumped) LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64 /builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT//usr/bin/node-24 -e "require('assert').equal(process.versions.node, '23.8.0')"
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4HMIzZ (%check)]: [What made build exit]


Answer: Issue: Possibly mismatch of paths of nodejs_modules
Resolution: Try to use bundled cjs-module-lexer
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Cannot load externalized builtin: "internal/deps/cjs-module-lexer/lexer:/usr/lib/node_modules_24/cjs-module-lexer/lexer.js".
----- Native stack trace -----

 1: 0x7f367494f621 node::builtins::BuiltinLoader::AddExternalizedBuiltin(char const*, char const*) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 2: 0x7f367494f80f node::builtins::BuiltinLoader::BuiltinLoader() [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 3: 0x7f367488bc30 node::InitializePrimordials(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 4: 0x7f367488bd70 node::GetPerContextExports(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 5: 0x7f367488bb48 node::InitializePrimordials(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 6: 0x7f367488be50 node::InitializeMainContextForSnapshot(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 7: 0x7f367488be75 node::InitializeContext(v8::Local<v8::Context>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 8: 0x7f367488beeb node::NewContext(v8::Isolate*, v8::Local<v8::ObjectTemplate>) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
 9: 0x7f36749d4174 node::NodeMainInstance::CreateMainEnvironment(node::ExitCode*) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
10: 0x7f36749d42c2 node::NodeMainInstance::Run() [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
11: 0x7f367492f047 node::Start(int, char**) [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libnode.so.131]
12: 0x7f367455b5f5  [/lib64/libc.so.6]
13: 0x7f367455b6a8 __libc_start_main [/lib64/libc.so.6]
14: 0x565154ff2035 _start [/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT//usr/bin/node-24]
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4HMIzZ: line 48: 35941 Aborted                 (core dumped) LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64 /builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs24-23.8.0-build/BUILDROOT//usr/bin/node-24 -e "require('assert').equal(process.versions.node, '23.8.0')"
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4HMIzZ (%check)

Answer: What made build exit
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [gen/shim_headers/minizip_shim/third_party/zlib/contrib/minizip/ioapi.h:5:10: fatal error: minizip/ioapi.h: No such file or directory
    5 | #include <minizip/ioapi.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.]: [The g++ compilation phase failed. Seems like the `minizip/ioapi.h` file is not present on the include path.]
=============
[
 minizip-ng-compat-devel              x86_64 3.0.10-7.fc40                       fedora      86.0 K]: [The minizip-ng-compat-devel package is being installed.  But the `ng` seems like next-generation or new-generation, so perhaps the header file has changed a location or disappeared?]


Answer: Issue: Missing header file for g++ compilation. Seems like some build-time dependency is not installed.
Resolution: Try to find where the header file is now. If the code that is being used (from the corresponding header) has moved, start including a different header file.