fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.]: [The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.]
=============
[      File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
        raise ConfigError(msg)
    sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.]


Answer: Issue: There was a breaking change in Sphinx 8.2.x. The projects need to update their codebase.
Resolution: In conf.py should be
intersphinx_mapping = {'python': ("https://docs.python.org/3/": None)}
instead of
intersphinx_mapping = {"https://docs.python.org/3/": None}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.

Answer: The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
      File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
        raise ConfigError(msg)
    sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).

Answer: The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Start: buildsrpm
Start: rpmbuild -bs
error: line 12: Unknown tag: %bcond check 1]: [EL8 doesn't know about the %bcond macro]


Answer: Issue: EL8 doesn't know about %bcond macro that is used in the spec to evaluate conditional values / params.
Resolution: Don't use %bcond macro in EL8 builds
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Start: buildsrpm
Start: rpmbuild -bs
error: line 12: Unknown tag: %bcond check 1

Answer: EL8 doesn't know about the %bcond macro
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [2024-02-03 20:04:31.993 utils.py          ERROR  Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/api.py", line 1592, in prepare_sources
    self.up.prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation(
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 638, in prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation
    SRPMBuilder(upstream=self, ref=upstream_ref).prepare(
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 975, in __init__
    self.rpmbuild_dir = self.upstream.absolute_specfile_dir
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 99, in absolute_specfile_dir
    return self.absolute_specfile_path.parent
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 111, in absolute_specfile_path
    raise FileNotFoundError(
FileNotFoundError: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.]: [Packit tried to prepare repository and find a specfile under /cli/*.spec path. This snippet show error that tells no such specfile under cli/vercajk.spec exists.]


Answer: Issue: Packit in Copr build, specifically in creating SRPM failed, the key issue was that Packit was told to look for specfile under cli/vercajk.spec path but no specfile was found under that path.
Resolution: Specify in .packit.yaml file the right path where the specfile is.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
2024-02-03 20:04:31.993 utils.py          ERROR  Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/api.py", line 1592, in prepare_sources
    self.up.prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation(
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 638, in prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation
    SRPMBuilder(upstream=self, ref=upstream_ref).prepare(
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 975, in __init__
    self.rpmbuild_dir = self.upstream.absolute_specfile_dir
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 99, in absolute_specfile_dir
    return self.absolute_specfile_path.parent
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 111, in absolute_specfile_path
    raise FileNotFoundError(
FileNotFoundError: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.

Answer: Packit tried to prepare repository and find a specfile under /cli/*.spec path. This snippet show error that tells no such specfile under cli/vercajk.spec exists.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [make: pg_config: Command not found
make: *** No rule to make target 'install'.  Stop.]: [The pg_config file was not found and the makefile being called during the make process does not contain the install rule itself]


Answer: Issue: The pg_config file was not found, it is either named incorrectly, not in the expected place missing or not passed to the call of make install correctly.
Resolution: Ensure the pg_config file is located in the expected directory, is named correctly and if needed is passed to the %make_install macro correctly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
make: pg_config: Command not found
make: *** No rule to make target 'install'.  Stop.

Answer: The pg_config file was not found and the makefile being called during the make process does not contain the install rule itself
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/libqalculate-5.5.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libqalculate.so.23.3.2]: [This indicates that the libqalculate.so.23.3.2 file was not found while trying to package it in the %files part of the build process.]


Answer: Issue: The file libqalculate.so.23.3.2 file was not found while trying to package it in the %files part of the build process, it does not exist, it's not named correctly or it is not located in the correct directory.
Resolution: Ensure the libqalculate.so.23.3.2 file is located in the correct directory, it is created during the build process and it is named correctly or that the %files section of the spec file contains the correct path and filename.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/libqalculate-5.5.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libqalculate.so.23.3.2

Answer: This indicates that the libqalculate.so.23.3.2 file was not found while trying to package it in the %files part of the build process.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [version conflict for package "Tcl": have 9.0.0, need 8.6
    while executing
"package require Tcl 8.6"
    (file "test/tester.tcl" line 33)]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: Mismatched version of dependency, requested version is different from what is provided.
Resolution: Package depends on Tcl version that is not present in Fedora, either fix in upstream or create a patch that fixes the issue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
version conflict for package "Tcl": have 9.0.0, need 8.6
    while executing
"package require Tcl 8.6"
    (file "test/tester.tcl" line 33)

Answer: Error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(condtype/default) >= 1.3.0 with crate(condtype/default) < 2.0.0~)
You can try to add to command line:]: [cargo crate may not have been added to fedora/copr yet]


Answer: Issue: unsatisfied dependencies
Resolution: run rust2rpm condtype and upload to spec to same copr project
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(condtype/default) >= 1.3.0 with crate(condtype/default) < 2.0.0~)
You can try to add to command line:

Answer: cargo crate may not have been added to fedora/copr yet
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Finish(bootstrap): chroot init]: [The 'Finish(bootstrap): chroot init' means that Mock finalized bootstrap installation, so there's no problem.]
=============
[Finish: installing minimal buildroot with dnf]: [The "Finish: installing minimal buildroot with dnf" means that even the minimal buildroot was successfully initialized.]
=============
[Start: build phase for rebase-helper-0.28.1-3.fc38.src.rpm]: [The "Start: build phase..." part means that Mock started building the source RPM. ]
=============
[Finish: build phase for rebase-helper-0.28.1-3.fc38.src.rpm]: [Source RPM has been successfully built.]
=============
[Error:
 Problem: package python3-sphinx_rtd_theme-1.1.1-2.fc38.noarch from copr_base requires (python3.11dist(sphinx) < 6~~ with python3.11dist(sphinx) >= 1.6), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both python3-sphinx-1:5.3.0-3.fc38.noarch from fedora and python3-sphinx-1:7.2.6-5.fc38.noarch from copr_base
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [But `python3-sphinx_rtd_theme` from `copr_base` seems to require non-installable dependencies in buildroot.]


Answer: Issue: Because the BuildRequires specify a non-installable package.
Resolution: Fix the dependency tree, either python3-sphinx_rtd_theme or python3-sphinx or both.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init

Answer: The 'Finish(bootstrap): chroot init' means that Mock finalized bootstrap installation, so there's no problem.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Finish: installing minimal buildroot with dnf

Answer: The "Finish: installing minimal buildroot with dnf" means that even the minimal buildroot was successfully initialized.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Start: build phase for rebase-helper-0.28.1-3.fc38.src.rpm

Answer: The "Start: build phase..." part means that Mock started building the source RPM.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Finish: build phase for rebase-helper-0.28.1-3.fc38.src.rpm

Answer: Source RPM has been successfully built.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error:
 Problem: package python3-sphinx_rtd_theme-1.1.1-2.fc38.noarch from copr_base requires (python3.11dist(sphinx) < 6~~ with python3.11dist(sphinx) >= 1.6), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both python3-sphinx-1:5.3.0-3.fc38.noarch from fedora and python3-sphinx-1:7.2.6-5.fc38.noarch from copr_base
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job

Answer: But `python3-sphinx_rtd_theme` from `copr_base` seems to require non-installable dependencies in buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.13.0, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/mock-5.9-build/mock-git-3857.8f7301c
collected 37 items

tests/plugins/test_rpmautospec.py ............                           [ 32%]
tests/test_buildroot.py .                                                [ 35%]
tests/test_buildroot_lock.py .F.                                         [ 43%]
tests/test_config_loader.py .                                            [ 45%]
tests/test_config_templates.py ......x...                                [ 72%]
tests/test_installed_packages.py .                                       [ 75%]
tests/test_package_manager.py .........                                  [100%]

Answer: Test are included into the build process.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED tests/test_buildroot_lock.py::test_buildroot_lock_output - TypeError: ...


Answer: Test named `test_buildroot_lock_output` has failed during the package build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    def test_buildroot_lock_output():
        """ test the buildroot_lock.json file format """
        tc, buildroot, plugins = _mock_vars(RPM_OUTPUT, REPOQUERY_OUTPUT)
&gt;       _call_method(plugins, buildroot)

tests/test_buildroot_lock.py:137: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
tests/test_buildroot_lock.py:105: in _call_method
    method()
py/mockbuild/plugins/buildroot_lock.py:115: in produce_lockfile
    fdlist.write(json.dumps(data, indent=4, sort_keys=True) + "\n")
/usr/lib64/python3.13/json/__init__.py:238: in dumps
    **kw).encode(obj)
/usr/lib64/python3.13/json/encoder.py:200: in encode
    chunks = self.iterencode(o, _one_shot=True)
/usr/lib64/python3.13/json/encoder.py:261: in iterencode
    return _iterencode(o, 0)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = &lt;json.encoder.JSONEncoder object at 0x7f2a44694a50&gt;
o = &lt;MagicMock name='mock.get_image_digest()' id='139819511716160'&gt;

    def default(self, o):
        """Implement this method in a subclass such that it returns
        a serializable object for ``o``, or calls the base implementation
        (to raise a ``TypeError``).
    
        For example, to support arbitrary iterators, you could
        implement default like this::
    
            def default(self, o):
                try:
                    iterable = iter(o)
                except TypeError:
                    pass
                else:
                    return list(iterable)
                # Let the base class default method raise the TypeError
                return super().default(o)
    
        """
&gt;       raise TypeError(f'Object of type {o.__class__.__name__} '
                        f'is not JSON serializable')
E       TypeError: Object of type MagicMock is not JSON serializable

Answer: The `test_buildroot_lock_output` test has failed with traceback `TypeError: Object of type MagicMock is not JSON serializable`

The `MagicMock` object is used for mocking the python object so this might be an issue in how the code is tested.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/15/include/omp.h:557:1: error: template with C linkage
  557 | template&lt;typename __T&gt;
      | ^~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/darktable-5.0.1-build/darktable-5.0.1/src/imageio/format/imageio_format_api.h:24:1: note: ‘extern "C"’ linkage started here
   24 | extern "C" {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~
[ 97%] Linking C shar]: [Use of C++ in scope defined as C code]


Answer: Issue: Source code has an error which prevents the build
Resolution: Remove C++ code from parts that should only contain C code
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/15/include/omp.h:557:1: error: template with C linkage
  557 | template&lt;typename __T&gt;
      | ^~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/darktable-5.0.1-build/darktable-5.0.1/src/imageio/format/imageio_format_api.h:24:1: note: ‘extern "C"’ linkage started here
   24 | extern "C" {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~
[ 97%] Linking C shar

Answer: Use of C++ in scope defined as C code
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [E   TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'type' and 'type']: [cause of the failed tests]
=============
[RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SpPQzz (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SpPQzz (%check)]: [reason why the build failed]


Answer: Issue: Using typing hints for union in Python 3.9 that are supported since Python 3.10
Resolution: Use the backward-compatible `Union[X, Y]`
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
E   TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'type' and 'type'

Answer: cause of the failed tests
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SpPQzz (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SpPQzz (%check)

Answer: reason why the build failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
+ scl enable '%{scl}' -
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Sgo1r8: line 33: scl: command not fou]: [Missing command 'scl']


Answer: Issue: Missing utility or script 'scl'
Resolution: Provide 'scl' to the enviroment
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

+ scl enable '%{scl}' -
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Sgo1r8: line 33: scl: command not fou

Answer: Missing command 'scl'
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: test_ipa_subdom_server
============================

[==========] tests: Running 13 test(s).
[ RUN      ] test_ipa_trust_dir2str
[       OK ] test_ipa_trust_dir2str
[ RUN      ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[       OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway
[ RUN      ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_exists
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[       OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_exists
[ RUN      ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fallback
[sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75993] failed with status [1].
[sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75994] failed with status [1].
[sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75995] failed with status [1].
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [75996] failed with status [1].
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[       OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fallback
[ RUN      ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fail
[sssd] [child_sig_handler] (0x0020): child [76001] failed with status [1].
[       OK ] test_ipa_server_create_oneway_kt_refresh_fail
[ RUN      ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init
[  ERROR   ] --- test_ctx->ipa_ctx->server_mode->trusts
[   LINE   ] --- src/tests/cmocka/test_ipa_subdomains_server.c:1002: error: Failure!
[  FAILED  ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init
[ RUN      ] test_ipa_server_trust_init
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[       OK ] test_ipa_server_trust_init
[ RUN      ] test_ipa_server_create_trusts
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[sssd] [ipa_get_options] (0x0020): No ipa server set, will use service discovery!
[       OK ] test_ipa_server_create_trusts
[ RUN      ] test_get_trust_direction_inbound
[       OK ] test_get_trust_direction_inbound
[ RUN      ] test_get_trust_direction_outbound
[       OK ] test_get_trust_direction_outbound
[ RUN      ] test_get_trust_direction_twoway
[       OK ] test_get_trust_direction_twoway
[ RUN      ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_root
[       OK ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_root
[ RUN      ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_member
[       OK ] test_get_trust_direction_notset_member
[==========] tests: 13 test(s) run.
[  PASSED  ] 12 test(s).
[  FAILED  ] tests: 1 test(s), listed below:
[  FAILED  ] test_ipa_server_trust_oneway_init

 1 FAILED TEST(S)
FAIL test_ipa_subdom_server (exit status: 1)

Answer: Log of the failed test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: test_ipa_subdom_server

Answer: Name of the failed test.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Patch #0 (version-fixes.diff):
+ echo 'Patch #0 (version-fixes.diff):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p0 --fuzz=0
patching file cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake
Hunk #1 FAILED at 95.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.NRkwWV (%prep)]: [Applying a patch in the %prep section failed.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the patch could not be applied. It may happen that when you try it manually, that patch works for you. But rpm uses fuzziness level 0 (patch --fuzz 0). And your patch may be off by a few lines.
Resolution: You need to rebase your Patch0. Apply the patch manually. Resolve conflicts if there are some. And generate a new patch.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Patch #0 (version-fixes.diff):
+ echo 'Patch #0 (version-fixes.diff):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p0 --fuzz=0
patching file cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake
Hunk #1 FAILED at 95.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.NRkwWV (%prep)

Answer: Applying a patch in the %prep section failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[ERROR] error: Source option 5 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.]: [Maven build failure related to the Java compiler not supporting a particular source option.]
=============
[[ERROR] error: Target option 5 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.]: [Maven build failure related to the Java compiler not supporting a particular target option.]


Answer: Issue: The Java compiler used during the build is newer than what the upstream build uses and does not support source and target option 5 but at least 8.
Resolution: Inspect the pom.xml file and find a build property affecting the Java source and target options. Set it to the a version supported by the packaged Java compiler.

You may need to patch the sources.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] error: Source option 5 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.

Answer: Maven build failure related to the Java compiler not supporting a particular source option.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] error: Target option 5 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.

Answer: Maven build failure related to the Java compiler not supporting a particular target option.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 09:23:43 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: start a mock HTTP server :: actually running 'python2 -m SimpleHTTPServer & 1>srv_out 2>srv_err'
/usr/share/beakerlib/testing.sh: line 896: python2: command not found]: [Missing python2 package.]
=============
[:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: telnet_err is empty :: actually running '! test -s telnet_err'
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: telnet_err is empty (Expected 0, got 1)]: [Failure caused by missing python2.]
=============
[:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: telnet_out is not empty :: actually running '  test -s telnet_out'
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: telnet_out is not empty (Expected 0, got 1)]: [Failure caused by missing python2.]
=============
[:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: compare what telnet received with what was sent :: actually running 'diffdump telnet_out data'
--- /dev/fd/63	2025-02-18 09:23:47.151243575 +0000
+++ /dev/fd/62	2025-02-18 09:23:47.154243644 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+00000000  68 65 6c 6c 6f 0a 6f 6e  65 0a 74 77 6f 0a 74 68  |hello.one.two.th|
+00000010  72 65 65 0a 62 79 65 0a                           |ree.bye.|
+00000018
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: compare what telnet received with what was sent (Expected 0, got 1)
8888888888888888888888
send: spawn id exp4 not open
    while executing
"send "GET /data\r\r""
    (file "telnet.expect" line 6)
8888888888888888888888]: [Failure caused by missing python2.]


Answer: Issue: python2 is not present on the system where the test was run.
Resolution: For RHELLike '>8' or for fedoras, do not use python2 but use python3 instead.

if rlIsRHELLike '>8' || rlIsFedora; then
              rlRun "python3 -m http.server & 1>srv_out 2>srv_err" 0 "start a mock HTTP server"
          else
              rlRun "python2 -m SimpleHTTPServer & 1>srv_out 2>srv_err"  0 "start a mock HTTP server"
          fi
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 09:23:43 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: start a mock HTTP server :: actually running 'python2 -m SimpleHTTPServer & 1>srv_out 2>srv_err'
/usr/share/beakerlib/testing.sh: line 896: python2: command not found

Answer: Missing python2 package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: telnet_err is empty :: actually running '! test -s telnet_err'
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: telnet_err is empty (Expected 0, got 1)

Answer: Failure caused by missing python2.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: telnet_out is not empty :: actually running '  test -s telnet_out'
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: telnet_out is not empty (Expected 0, got 1)

Answer: Failure caused by missing python2.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: compare what telnet received with what was sent :: actually running 'diffdump telnet_out data'
--- /dev/fd/63	2025-02-18 09:23:47.151243575 +0000
+++ /dev/fd/62	2025-02-18 09:23:47.154243644 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+00000000  68 65 6c 6c 6f 0a 6f 6e  65 0a 74 77 6f 0a 74 68  |hello.one.two.th|
+00000010  72 65 65 0a 62 79 65 0a                           |ree.bye.|
+00000018
:: [ 09:23:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: compare what telnet received with what was sent (Expected 0, got 1)
8888888888888888888888
send: spawn id exp4 not open
    while executing
"send "GET /data\r\r""
    (file "telnet.expect" line 6)
8888888888888888888888

Answer: Failure caused by missing python2.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [disc.c: In function ‘disc_stop’:
disc.c:286:17: error: too many arguments to function ‘drives[drive].stop’; expected 0, have 1
  286 |                 drives[drive].stop(drive);
      |                 ^~~~~~             ~~~~~]: [gcc error stating that incorrect number of arguments were used.]


Answer: Issue: Program cannot be compiled
Resolution: check that library header file is used properly, so compilation uses correct definition
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
disc.c: In function ‘disc_stop’:
disc.c:286:17: error: too many arguments to function ‘drives[drive].stop’; expected 0, have 1
  286 |                 drives[drive].stop(drive);
      |                 ^~~~~~             ~~~~~

Answer: gcc error stating that incorrect number of arguments were used.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_ggsave.py::TestArguments::test_save_method - AssertionError...
FAILED tests/test_guide_internals.py::test_no_after_scale_warning - pandas.er...
FAILED tests/test_save_as_pdf_pages.py::TestArguments::test_save_method - Ass...
=== 3 failed, 293 passed, 1 skipped, 95 deselected, 8539 warnings in 35.58s ====]: [testsuite fail summary]


Answer: Issue: Failed because of fails in testsuite
Resolution: Check the test results and update the code or the test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_ggsave.py::TestArguments::test_save_method - AssertionError...
FAILED tests/test_guide_internals.py::test_no_after_scale_warning - pandas.er...
FAILED tests/test_save_as_pdf_pages.py::TestArguments::test_save_method - Ass...
=== 3 failed, 293 passed, 1 skipped, 95 deselected, 8539 warnings in 35.58s ====

Answer: testsuite fail summary
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Meson version is 1.3.2 but project requires >= 1.4.0]: [An error during build is reported.]


Answer: Issue: According to error report, the meson build system present in buildroot was older than required.
Resolution: Update the meson build system either via package repository or directly via pip.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Meson version is 1.3.2 but project requires >= 1.4.0

Answer: An error during build is reported.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/xdg-desktop-portal.c.rej]: [It indicates that a patch has failed to apply.]


Answer: Issue: Because a downstream patch failed to apply.
Resolution: Rebase the patch so that I applies clearly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/xdg-desktop-portal.c.rej

Answer: It indicates that a patch has failed to apply.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:461:  No match for argument: python3dist(terminaltables) >= 3.1.10]: [Required package for the build is not available in the requested version.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:461:  Problem 1: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:461:    - nothing provides ((python3.12dist(cryptography) < 40 or python3.12dist(cryptography) > 40) with (python3.12dist(cryptography) < 40.0.1 or python3.12dist(cryptography) > 40.0.1) with python3.12dist(cryptography) < 42~~ with python3.12dist(cryptography) >= 38) needed by python3-pyOpenSSL-23.2.0-3.fc40.noarch
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 2: package python3-oci-2.124.2-1.fc41.noarch requires (python3.12dist(pyopenssl) < 25~~ with python3.12dist(pyopenssl) >= 17.5), but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:461:    - conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:461:    - nothing provides ((python3.12dist(cryptography) < 40 or python3.12dist(cryptography) > 40) with (python3.12dist(cryptography) < 40.0.1 or python3.12dist(cryptography) > 40.0.1) with python3.12dist(cryptography) < 42~~ with python3.12dist(cryptography) >= 38) needed by python3-pyOpenSSL-23.2.0-3.fc40.noarch]: [Error from the requirements for the package. The requested package provides can't be satisfied.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:461:  Failed to resolve the transaction:]: [RPM package transaction has failed. Build can't continue because some dependencies can't be satisfied.  ]


Answer: Issue: Package dependency can't be satisfied because there is a package which can't be found.
Resolution: Fix the missing package dependency. Verify that the package is correct and if it is missing you can add it as a new package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  No match for argument: python3dist(terminaltables) >= 3.1.10

Answer: Required package for the build is not available in the requested version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  Problem 1: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:461:    - nothing provides ((python3.12dist(cryptography) < 40 or python3.12dist(cryptography) > 40) with (python3.12dist(cryptography) < 40.0.1 or python3.12dist(cryptography) > 40.0.1) with python3.12dist(cryptography) < 42~~ with python3.12dist(cryptography) >= 38) needed by python3-pyOpenSSL-23.2.0-3.fc40.noarch
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 2: package python3-oci-2.124.2-1.fc41.noarch requires (python3.12dist(pyopenssl) < 25~~ with python3.12dist(pyopenssl) >= 17.5), but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:461:    - conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:461:    - nothing provides ((python3.12dist(cryptography) < 40 or python3.12dist(cryptography) > 40) with (python3.12dist(cryptography) < 40.0.1 or python3.12dist(cryptography) > 40.0.1) with python3.12dist(cryptography) < 42~~ with python3.12dist(cryptography) >= 38) needed by python3-pyOpenSSL-23.2.0-3.fc40.noarch

Answer: Error from the requirements for the package. The requested package provides can't be satisfied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  Failed to resolve the transaction:

Answer: RPM package transaction has failed. Build can't continue because some dependencies can't be satisfied.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Run-time dependency libadwaita-1 found: NO 

src/meson.build:33:2: ERROR: Dependency lookup for libadwaita-1 with method 'pkgconfig' failed: Invalid version, need 'libadwaita-1' ['>= 1.7'] found '1.6.6'.]: [This part exactly describes what happened.]


Answer: Issue: The build is failing because it requires a newer version of libadwaita than what's available on the system.
Resolution: If you have access to the system, update the libadwaita. If there's no newer libadwaita in the repositories, ask the maintainer to rebase it to a newer version. If it can't be rebased, consider building an older version of your package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Run-time dependency libadwaita-1 found: NO 

src/meson.build:33:2: ERROR: Dependency lookup for libadwaita-1 with method 'pkgconfig' failed: Invalid version, need 'libadwaita-1' ['>= 1.7'] found '1.6.6'.

Answer: This part exactly describes what happened.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jjJXFj (%check)

Answer: Build failed during %check phase