fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
node:assert:95
  throw new AssertionError(obj);
  ^
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly equal:
+ actual - expected
+ '\nfiller\n'
- 'goodbye\n'
    at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs22-22.15.1-build/node-v22.15.1/test/parallel/test-child-process-stdout-flush-exit.js:54:12)
    at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs22-22.15.1-build/node-v22.15.1/test/common/index.js:435:15)
    at ChildProcess.emit (node:events:518:28)
    at maybeClose (node:internal/child_process:1101:16)
    at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:304:5) {
  generatedMessage: true,
  code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
  actual: '\nfiller\n',
  expected: 'goodbye\n',
  operator: 'strictEqual'
}
Node.js v22.15.1

Answer: Issue in check section - test failing
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [E               Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'fontTools.feaLib.error.FeatureLibError'>
tests/featureCompiler_test.py:301: Failed]: [The error message shows a supposed error is not raised]
=============
[E           Failed: TTX output is different from expected
tests/integration_test.py:73: Failed]: [pytest failed due to the expected output is different from the actual ones]


Answer: Issue: The build failed  due to the pytest error
Resolution: Check the testcases, and  modify them
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
E               Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'fontTools.feaLib.error.FeatureLibError'>
tests/featureCompiler_test.py:301: Failed

Answer: The error message shows a supposed error is not raised
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
E           Failed: TTX output is different from expected
tests/integration_test.py:73: Failed

Answer: pytest failed due to the expected output is different from the actual ones
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR tests/test_action.py
ERROR tests/test_background_worker_build.py
ERROR tests/test_createrepo.py
ERROR tests/test_helpers.py
ERROR tests/test_modifyrepo.py
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 5 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]: [Some errors in Python's test-suite.]
=============
[
    from copr_common.helpers import (
E   ImportError: cannot import name 'USER_SSH_DEFAULT_EXPIRATION' from 'copr_common.helpers' (/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/copr_common/helpers.py]: [Python can not import the USER_SSH_DEFAULT_EXPIRATION symbol from 'copr_common.helpers' file. This means that the symbol doesn't exist there.]


Answer: Issue: Importing a non-existing python symbol at test-time, this typically means that the package is broken and it is good it fails at %check phase.
Resolution: Take a look why the symbol disappeared, and start providing that (in the `copr_common` package) or remove the dependency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR tests/test_action.py
ERROR tests/test_background_worker_build.py
ERROR tests/test_createrepo.py
ERROR tests/test_helpers.py
ERROR tests/test_modifyrepo.py
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 5 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer: Some errors in Python's test-suite.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

    from copr_common.helpers import (
E   ImportError: cannot import name 'USER_SSH_DEFAULT_EXPIRATION' from 'copr_common.helpers' (/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/copr_common/helpers.py

Answer: Python can not import the USER_SSH_DEFAULT_EXPIRATION symbol from 'copr_common.helpers' file. This means that the symbol doesn't exist there.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ ./Setup configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --docdir=/usr/share/licenses/ghc-http-conduit '--libsubdir=$compiler/lib/$pkgid' '--datasubdir=$pkgid' '--libexecsubdir=$pkgid' --ghc --dynlibdir=/usr/lib64/ghc-9.8.4/lib --global '--ghc-options=-fhide-source-paths  -optc-O2 -optc-fexceptions -optc-g -optc-grecord-gcc-switches -optc-pipe -optc-Wall -optc-Werror=format-security -optc-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -optc-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -optc-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -optc-fstack-protector-strong -optc-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -optc-m64 -optc-march=z13 -optc-mtune=z14 -optc-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -optc-fstack-clash-protection  -optl-Wl,-z,relro -optl-Wl,--as-needed -optl-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -optl-Wl,--build-id=sha1' --enable-library-profiling --enable-shared --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/http-conduit-2.3.9.1 --global
Configuring http-conduit-2.3.9.1...
Error: Setup: Encountered missing or private dependencies:
attoparsec-aeson >=2.1
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.c8sypp (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.c8sypp (%build)]: [The build process complains about a missing required dependency.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to a missing required dependency: attoparsec-aeson (in version 2.1 or newer)
Resolution: Add a BuildRequires to the specfile with a package that provides the required dependency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ ./Setup configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --docdir=/usr/share/licenses/ghc-http-conduit '--libsubdir=$compiler/lib/$pkgid' '--datasubdir=$pkgid' '--libexecsubdir=$pkgid' --ghc --dynlibdir=/usr/lib64/ghc-9.8.4/lib --global '--ghc-options=-fhide-source-paths  -optc-O2 -optc-fexceptions -optc-g -optc-grecord-gcc-switches -optc-pipe -optc-Wall -optc-Werror=format-security -optc-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -optc-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -optc-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -optc-fstack-protector-strong -optc-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -optc-m64 -optc-march=z13 -optc-mtune=z14 -optc-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -optc-fstack-clash-protection  -optl-Wl,-z,relro -optl-Wl,--as-needed -optl-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -optl-Wl,--build-id=sha1' --enable-library-profiling --enable-shared --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/http-conduit-2.3.9.1 --global
Configuring http-conduit-2.3.9.1...
Error: Setup: Encountered missing or private dependencies:
attoparsec-aeson >=2.1
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.c8sypp (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.c8sypp (%build)

Answer: The build process complains about a missing required dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAIL: domain-test
=================
*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
FAIL domain-test (exit status: 134)
]: [This is test failure.]


Answer: Issue: The test was aborted by glibc because it detected an invalid use of a memory.
Resolution: You need to run the test manually under a debugger to obtain an exact location where the memory access is violated. Then you need to study the preceding code to find where the mistake is.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: domain-test
=================
*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
FAIL domain-test (exit status: 134)


Answer: This is test failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:459:    - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-diskcache-5.6.3-6.fc42.noarch from build]: [error message]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because there is conflicts in the dependence
Resolution: Check the spec file, and make sure the conflict package(diskcache) has right version
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:459:    - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-diskcache-5.6.3-6.fc42.noarch from build

Answer: error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tvSnU6 (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tvSnU6 (%build)
]: [The build failed in %build phase.]
=============
[+ sphinx-build docs html
Running Sphinx v8.1.3
WARNING: Invalid configuration value found: 'language = None'. Update your configuration to a valid language code. Falling back to 'en' (English).
loading translations [en]... done
making output directory... done
Converting `source_suffix = '.rst'` to `source_suffix = {'.rst': 'restructuredtext'}`.
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.
Configuration error:
Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [sphinx failed to generate the documentation.]


Answer: Issue: intersphinx_mapping expects two elements, while there is only one argument passed.
Resolution: Instead of
  intersphinx_mapping = {'https://docs.python.org/': None}
use
  intersphinx_mapping = {'python': ('https://docs.python.org/3', None)}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tvSnU6 (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tvSnU6 (%build)


Answer: The build failed in %build phase.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ sphinx-build docs html
Running Sphinx v8.1.3
WARNING: Invalid configuration value found: 'language = None'. Update your configuration to a valid language code. Falling back to 'en' (English).
loading translations [en]... done
making output directory... done
Converting `source_suffix = '.rst'` to `source_suffix = {'.rst': 'restructuredtext'}`.
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.
Configuration error:
Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).

Answer: sphinx failed to generate the documentation.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/bin/install -p -m 644 html/*.png /builddir/build/BUILD/libzmf-0.0.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/doc/libzmf/html/
install: cannot stat 'html/*.png': No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [Makefile:480: install-data-am] Error 1]: [Here is the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: The package defines a install hook for doxygen-generated HTML docs that picks just files with selected extensions, including .png (which is unwise at best, because the package doesn't have any control over doxygen's output, therefore it can miss something that's needed). Unfortunately, latest doxygen stopped generating any PNG images for the package.
Resolution: Just install all files generated by doxygen. There are two ways to to do it, a quick one and a comprehensive one (:

1. Patch relevant Makefile.in . I think this is good enough for this kind of issue that's hopefully going to be fixed in the next release.

2. Patch relevant Makefile.am and run `automake path/to/Makefile` in %prep or %build. This also needs `Requires: automake`. Unfortunately, this fails if the tarball was created by a different version of autotools. In that case, it's necessary to run the full stack (autoconf and automake as a minimum). Projects that use autotools usually ship a script called autogen.sh; if it exists, it should be used.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/install -p -m 644 html/*.png /builddir/build/BUILD/libzmf-0.0.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/doc/libzmf/html/
install: cannot stat 'html/*.png': No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [Makefile:480: install-data-am] Error 1

Answer: Here is the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [AssertionError]: [A failure of the included test suite]
=============
[FAILED core/tests/test_profile.py]: [A failure of the included test suite]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TILhqa (%check)]: [A failure from the %check section (where the included test suite is executed)]


Answer: Issue: The included test suite, executed from the %check section, failed, and therefore the whole build failed.
Resolution: This doesn't seem to be a packaging error. The test suite needs to be corrected. Either this is a genuine failure of the packaged program/library, or there is a problem in the tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
AssertionError

Answer: A failure of the included test suite
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED core/tests/test_profile.py

Answer: A failure of the included test suite
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TILhqa (%check)

Answer: A failure from the %check section (where the included test suite is executed)
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file.]
=============
[
      File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
        raise ConfigError(msg)
    sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file.]


Answer: Issue: There was a breaking change in Sphinx 8.2.x. The project needs to update their codebase.
Resolution: In conf.py should be
intersphinx_mapping = {'python': ("https://docs.python.org/3/": None)}
instead of
intersphinx_mapping = {"https://docs.python.org/3/": None}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.

Answer: The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

      File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
        raise ConfigError(msg)
    sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).

Answer: The snippet shows error in the sphinx configuration file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: tcl-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.i686 from fedora has inferior architecture
  - package tcl-devel-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.i686 from fedora requires tcl = 1:8.6.14-2.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc41.x86_64 from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora
  - package tk-devel-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires tcl-devel = 1:8.6.14, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package tcl-devel-1:8.6.15-6.fc41.x86_64 from copr_base requires tcl = 1:8.6.15-6.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed
]: [The package tcl-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.i686 is designed for a 32-bit architecture (i686), while the build environment appears to be 64-bit (x86_64). This fundamental incompatibility prevents its installation.]


Answer: Issue: The RPM build system is unable to find a consistent and compatible set of packages to fulfill all the dependencies. This results in the error message "cannot install the best candidate for the job."
Resolution: Ensure that the build environment is set up for the correct architecture (x86_64 in this case).
Reconfigure the build process to target the 64-bit architecture.

Reach out to the package maintainer for guidance and assistance in resolving the specific issues.
They may have insights into the root cause of the problem and potential solutions.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: tcl-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.i686 from fedora has inferior architecture
  - package tcl-devel-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.i686 from fedora requires tcl = 1:8.6.14-2.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc41.x86_64 from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora
  - package tk-devel-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires tcl-devel = 1:8.6.14, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package tcl-devel-1:8.6.15-6.fc41.x86_64 from copr_base requires tcl = 1:8.6.15-6.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed


Answer: The package tcl-1:8.6.14-2.fc41.i686 is designed for a 32-bit architecture (i686), while the build environment appears to be 64-bit (x86_64). This fundamental incompatibility prevents its installation.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAIL: domain-test
=================
*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
FAIL domain-test (exit status: 134)
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for avahi 0.8
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 7
# PASS:  6
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0]: [This part of the log is a summary of test suite run and also lists individual tests that failed]


Answer: Issue: domain-test test case failed due to potential buffer overflow detected by FORTIFY_SOURCE hardening in glibc.
Resolution: Failing test binary needs to be re-run under gdb and there must be analysis done whether the reported issue is an actual problem or false positive.

In this case it was a false positive and glibc's FORTIFY_SOURCE mechanism was unable to deal zero-length union member.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: domain-test
=================
*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
FAIL domain-test (exit status: 134)
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for avahi 0.8
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 7
# PASS:  6
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

Answer: This part of the log is a summary of test suite run and also lists individual tests that failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: chromium-headless
No match for argument: rubygem(selenium-webdriver)]: [Failure in DNF output installing build root]


Answer: Issue: chromium-headless is not available on ppc64le:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/blob/0d9761748509bb12051ab149d28c1052cd834f87/f/chromium.spec#_46-48
Resolution: Remove `ppc64le` from build architectures. In this specific case by this change:

~~~
diff --git a/rubygem-actiontext.spec b/rubygem-actiontext.spec
index 9e1790a..34554d6 100644
--- a/rubygem-actiontext.spec
+++ b/rubygem-actiontext.spec
@@ -38,7 +38,9 @@ BuildRequires: rubygem(selenium-webdriver)
 BuildRequires: chromedriver chromium chromium-headless
 # Chromium availability is limited.
 # https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/blob/0d9761748509bb12051ab149d28c1052cd834f87/f/chromium.spec#_800
-ExclusiveArch: x86_64 aarch64 ppc64le noarch
+# and chrome-headless even more:
+# https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/blob/0d9761748509bb12051ab149d28c1052cd834f87/f/chromium.spec#_46-48
+ExclusiveArch: x86_64 aarch64 noarch
 %{?with_js_recompilation:BuildRequires: %{_bindir}/npm}
 BuildArch: noarch
 
~~~
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: chromium-headless
No match for argument: rubygem(selenium-webdriver)

Answer: Failure in DNF output installing build root
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Package "python3-packaging-24.2-3.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-8.3.4-2.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
No match for argument: python3dist(setuptools) = 75.6
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
Finish: rpmbuild python-damo-2.7.7-1.fc42.src.rpm]: [Specific version of python package is not present in repositories]


Answer: Issue: Package is compatible only with specific version of dependency, which is not present in repositories.
Resolution: Modify the package to depend on a different version of the dependency, or package the dependency in fedora or copr repositories
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Package "python3-packaging-24.2-3.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-8.3.4-2.fc42.noarch" is already installed.
No match for argument: python3dist(setuptools) = 75.6
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
Finish: rpmbuild python-damo-2.7.7-1.fc42.src.rpm

Answer: Specific version of python package is not present in repositories
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 08:52:43 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Running 'dnf -y --installroot=/tmp/tmp.ExxofwZ4XW --releasever=43 install net-tools'
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: net-tools
No repositories were loaded from the installroot. To use the configuration and repositories of the host system, pass --use-host-config.
:: [ 08:52:43 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'dnf -y --installroot=/tmp/tmp.ExxofwZ4XW --releasever=43 install net-tools' (Expected 0, got 1)]: [Indication that the installation of net-tools failed.]


Answer: Issue: Installation of net-tools failed because of the missing parameter of dnf.
Resolution: Add "--use-host-config" parameter to the dnf command.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 08:52:43 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Running 'dnf -y --installroot=/tmp/tmp.ExxofwZ4XW --releasever=43 install net-tools'
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: net-tools
No repositories were loaded from the installroot. To use the configuration and repositories of the host system, pass --use-host-config.
:: [ 08:52:43 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'dnf -y --installroot=/tmp/tmp.ExxofwZ4XW --releasever=43 install net-tools' (Expected 0, got 1)

Answer: Indication that the installation of net-tools failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.14-1.fc41.aarch64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar]: [It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) package.  
]


Answer: Issue: Some of the required packages were not installed.

Resolution: Resolve the conflict first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.14-1.fc41.aarch64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar

Answer: It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [	pty.sh[157]: FAIL: POSIX sh 029(C): line 173: expected "(Stopped|Suspended) \(SIGTTOU\)", got EOF
test pty(C.UTF-8) failed at 2025-04-25+07:22:59 with exit code 1 [ 62 tests 1 error ]]: [Fatal test failure]


Answer: Issue: One of the tests failed.
Resolution: Try resubmitting the build because ppc64le workers are prone to be slower.  Otherwise, inspect the test failure further.  If unsure, try to discuss it with upstream as well.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
	pty.sh[157]: FAIL: POSIX sh 029(C): line 173: expected "(Stopped|Suspended) \(SIGTTOU\)", got EOF
test pty(C.UTF-8) failed at 2025-04-25+07:22:59 with exit code 1 [ 62 tests 1 error ]

Answer: Fatal test failure
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [  HINT: you may need to install a package such as libpipewire-0.3, libpipewire-0.3-dev or libpipewire-0.3-devel.]: [Indication pipewire is needed somewhere]


Answer: Issue: The system library `libpipewire-0.3` required by crate `libspa-sys` was not found.
Resolution: Install pipewire-devel?
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  HINT: you may need to install a package such as libpipewire-0.3, libpipewire-0.3-dev or libpipewire-0.3-devel.

Answer: Indication pipewire is needed somewhere
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ela/date.c:7:16: error: cannot use keyword ‘false’ as enumeration constant
    7 | typedef enum { false, true } bool;
      |                ^~~~~
ela/date.c:7:16: note: ‘false’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
ela/date.c:7:30: error: expected ‘;’, identifier or ‘(’ before ‘bool’
    7 | typedef enum { false, true } bool;
      |                              ^~~~
ela/date.c:7:30: warning: useless type name in empty declaration]: [The relevant error message saying that bool, true and false are now keywords]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because bool, true and false are now really keyword with gcc 15 which defaults to C23.
Resolution: replace the line "typedef enum { false, true } bool;" in ela/date.c with "#include <stdbool.h>
"
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ela/date.c:7:16: error: cannot use keyword ‘false’ as enumeration constant
    7 | typedef enum { false, true } bool;
      |                ^~~~~
ela/date.c:7:16: note: ‘false’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
ela/date.c:7:30: error: expected ‘;’, identifier or ‘(’ before ‘bool’
    7 | typedef enum { false, true } bool;
      |                              ^~~~
ela/date.c:7:30: warning: useless type name in empty declaration

Answer: The relevant error message saying that bool, true and false are now keywords
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Can't exec "libtoolize": No such file or directory at /usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 318.
autoreconf: error: libtoolize failed with exit status: 2]: [The error was caused by autoreconf attempting to invoke libtoolize, which is not present on the system.]


Answer: Issue: Missing BuildRequires for package shipping "libtoolize".

Resolution: Add "BuildRequires: libtoolize". Package libtool ships "libtoolize".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Can't exec "libtoolize": No such file or directory at /usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 318.
autoreconf: error: libtoolize failed with exit status: 2

Answer: The error was caused by autoreconf attempting to invoke libtoolize, which is not present on the system.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [mysql-test-run: *** ERROR: there were failing test cases
]: [The testsuite failed, beacuse of failing test cases.]
=============
[[ fail ]]: [MariaDB / MySQL test was tried for the first time and failed.]
=============
[timeout after 1200 seconds]: [The test failed because of the timeout.
The timeout is specified as an argument to the 'mysql-test-run.pl']
=============
[--suite-timeout=900 --testcase-timeout=20]: [timeout values for the whole testsuite (in minutes) and for each test run (in minutes)]
=============
[[ retry-fail ]]: [MariaDB / MySQL test failed before and now was retried and it failed again.]
=============
[timeout after 1200 seconds]: [The test failed because of the timeout.
The timeout is specified as an argument to the 'mysql-test-run.pl']
=============
[Test case timeout after 1200 seconds]: [The test failed because of the timeout.
The timeout is specified as an argument to the 'mysql-test-run.pl']


Answer: Issue: The testsuite failed, beacuse of failing test cases.
The test cases failed of timeout.
Resolution: Find out why the test(s) timed out.
Fix the test or enlarge the timeout value argument for 'mysql-test-run.pl'
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
mysql-test-run: *** ERROR: there were failing test cases


Answer: The testsuite failed, beacuse of failing test cases.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ fail ]

Answer: MariaDB / MySQL test was tried for the first time and failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
timeout after 1200 seconds

Answer: The test failed because of the timeout.
The timeout is specified as an argument to the 'mysql-test-run.pl'
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
--suite-timeout=900 --testcase-timeout=20

Answer: timeout values for the whole testsuite (in minutes) and for each test run (in minutes)
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ retry-fail ]

Answer: MariaDB / MySQL test failed before and now was retried and it failed again.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Test case timeout after 1200 seconds

Answer: The test failed because of the timeout.
The timeout is specified as an argument to the 'mysql-test-run.pl'
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [12/21 Test #12: test_ruby_libdnf5_base/test_base.rb .........................***Not Run   0.00 sec]: [Test #12 was not executed.]
=============
[Could not find executable ]: [Executable was not found.]
=============
[13/21 Test #13: test_ruby_libdnf5_base_test_case.rb .........................***Not Run   0.00 sec]: [Test #13 was not executed.]
=============
[The following tests FAILED:
	 12 - test_ruby_libdnf5_base/test_base.rb (Not Run)
	 13 - test_ruby_libdnf5_base_test_case.rb (Not Run)
	 14 - test_ruby_libdnf5_logger/test_loggers.rb (Not Run)
	 15 - test_ruby_libdnf5_repo/test_file_downloader.rb (Not Run)
	 16 - test_ruby_libdnf5_repo/test_package_downloader.rb (Not Run)
	 17 - test_ruby_libdnf5_repo/test_repo.rb (Not Run)
	 18 - test_ruby_libdnf5_rpm/test_package_query.rb (Not Run)
	 19 - test_ruby_libdnf5_rpm/test_package_query_set_operators.rb (Not Run)
	 20 - test_ruby_libdnf5_utils/test_patterns.rb (Not Run)]: [Multiple tests have failed, as they were not run. Tests #12 to #20 were not executed, causing test suite failure.]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M ec9af141fd814a06a7662034669d845e -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1741087211.456179/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.xamr75z1:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/dnf5.spec']: [Build command has failed.]


Answer: Issue: Executable required for tests #12 - #20 has not been found during execution of the test suite. This caused the test suite to fail, which led to build failure.
Resolution: Ensure that all tests of package can be executed on the machine used for build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
12/21 Test #12: test_ruby_libdnf5_base/test_base.rb .........................***Not Run   0.00 sec

Answer: Test #12 was not executed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Could not find executable 

Answer: Executable was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
13/21 Test #13: test_ruby_libdnf5_base_test_case.rb .........................***Not Run   0.00 sec

Answer: Test #13 was not executed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
The following tests FAILED:
	 12 - test_ruby_libdnf5_base/test_base.rb (Not Run)
	 13 - test_ruby_libdnf5_base_test_case.rb (Not Run)
	 14 - test_ruby_libdnf5_logger/test_loggers.rb (Not Run)
	 15 - test_ruby_libdnf5_repo/test_file_downloader.rb (Not Run)
	 16 - test_ruby_libdnf5_repo/test_package_downloader.rb (Not Run)
	 17 - test_ruby_libdnf5_repo/test_repo.rb (Not Run)
	 18 - test_ruby_libdnf5_rpm/test_package_query.rb (Not Run)
	 19 - test_ruby_libdnf5_rpm/test_package_query_set_operators.rb (Not Run)
	 20 - test_ruby_libdnf5_utils/test_patterns.rb (Not Run)

Answer: Multiple tests have failed, as they were not run. Tests #12 to #20 were not executed, causing test suite failure.