fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.aarch64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar]: [It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) p
ackage.
]


Answer: Issue: Some of the required packages were not installed.
Resolution: Resolve the conflict first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.aarch64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar

Answer: It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) p
ackage.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [go: command not found]: [This is an error that a binary called 'go' wasn't found in the system.]


Answer: Issue: The 'go' command was required to build the source code, but wasn't present in the build environment.
Resolution: Ensure that 'go' is installed in the build environment. This usually means identifying the package that includes this command, and specifying it as a build requirement in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
go: command not found

Answer: This is an error that a binary called 'go' wasn't found in the system.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
A full log can be found at /builddir/build/BUILD/libsecret-0.21.7/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Unl02f (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Unl02f (%build)
Child return code was: 1]: [Meson complains about a missing required dependency: bash-completion]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the build system fails to find a required dependency: bash-completion
Resolution: Add "BuildRequires: bash-completion" to the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
A full log can be found at /builddir/build/BUILD/libsecret-0.21.7/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Unl02f (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Unl02f (%build)
Child return code was: 1

Answer: Meson complains about a missing required dependency: bash-completion
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CMake Error at scripts/CMakeLists.txt:415 (MESSAGE):]: [Header of the CMake error message]
=============
[Can not find mariadb.tmpfiles.d.sh or mariadb.tmpfiles.d.in in
  /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/mariadb-10.11.11/scripts]: [CMake error description]


Answer: Issue: the CMake file call file that does not exist
Resolution: make sure the file in question exists or the CMake configuration is patched so it won't need it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error at scripts/CMakeLists.txt:415 (MESSAGE):

Answer: Header of the CMake error message
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Can not find mariadb.tmpfiles.d.sh or mariadb.tmpfiles.d.in in
  /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/mariadb-10.11.11/scripts

Answer: CMake error description
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [libtool:   error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool:   error:   '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs'
libtool:   error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool:   error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool:   error:   '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin'
libtool:   error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool:   error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool:   error:   '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs'
libtool:   error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool:   error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool:   error:   '/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/../../lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/../../bin:/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin'
libtool:   error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.]: [Libtool tried to use paths for different environment (either architecture or system) than build target should be.]
=============
[../../backends/markup-tree.c: In function 'load_subdirs':
../../backends/markup-tree.c:698:29: error: passing argument 2 of 'g_stat' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  698 |       if (g_stat (fullpath, &amp;statbuf) &lt; 0)
      |                             ^~~~~~~~
      |                             |
      |                             struct stat *
In file included from ../../gconf/gconf-internals.h:33:
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstdio.h:141:31: note: expected 'GStatBuf *' {aka 'struct _stat32 *'} but argument is of type 'struct stat *'
  141 |                  GStatBuf    *buf);
      |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~]: [A function is called with incompatible argument pointer type. It expected _stat32 but stat was used.]


Answer: Issue: Because incompatible types has been used. Besides of that probably build has been configured for different target system (architecture or system).
Resolution: Inspect the build configuration files and correct target environment (architecture or system) include path, defined macros and compile flags.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
libtool:   error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool:   error:   '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs'
libtool:   error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool:   error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool:   error:   '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin'
libtool:   error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool:   error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool:   error:   '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs'
libtool:   error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool:   error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool:   error:   '/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/../../lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/../../bin:/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin'
libtool:   error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.

Answer: Libtool tried to use paths for different environment (either architecture or system) than build target should be.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
../../backends/markup-tree.c: In function 'load_subdirs':
../../backends/markup-tree.c:698:29: error: passing argument 2 of 'g_stat' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  698 |       if (g_stat (fullpath, &amp;statbuf) &lt; 0)
      |                             ^~~~~~~~
      |                             |
      |                             struct stat *
In file included from ../../gconf/gconf-internals.h:33:
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstdio.h:141:31: note: expected 'GStatBuf *' {aka 'struct _stat32 *'} but argument is of type 'struct stat *'
  141 |                  GStatBuf    *buf);
      |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~

Answer: A function is called with incompatible argument pointer type. It expected _stat32 but stat was used.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljack: No such file or directory]: [GNU linker `/usr/bin/ld` can not find library `jack`. This will cause issues with compilation.]
=============
[collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status]: [GNU linker `ld` has failed with status `1`.]
=============
[make[1]: *** [makefile.qt-jack:480: miniAudicle] Error 1]: [Line `480` of `makefile.qt-jack` has been executed with an error.]
=============
[make: [makefile:53: linux-jack] Error 2 (ignored)]: [Line `53` of makefile for linux-jack has been executed with error. The error was ignored.]
=============
[mv: cannot stat 'miniAudicle': No such file or directory]: [Program `mv` for moving directories and files, has failed with `miniAudicle` argument. No file or directory `miniAudicle` was found.]
=============
[RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zYxGaU (%build)]: [General message, indicating that RPM build has experienced errors.]


Answer: Issue: Library `jack` required for build was not found by linker.
Resolution: Ensure that all build time dependencies are available on the machine used for build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljack: No such file or directory

Answer: GNU linker `/usr/bin/ld` can not find library `jack`. This will cause issues with compilation.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Answer: GNU linker `ld` has failed with status `1`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
make[1]: *** [makefile.qt-jack:480: miniAudicle] Error 1

Answer: Line `480` of `makefile.qt-jack` has been executed with an error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
make: [makefile:53: linux-jack] Error 2 (ignored)

Answer: Line `53` of makefile for linux-jack has been executed with error. The error was ignored.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
mv: cannot stat 'miniAudicle': No such file or directory

Answer: Program `mv` for moving directories and files, has failed with `miniAudicle` argument. No file or directory `miniAudicle` was found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zYxGaU (%build)

Answer: General message, indicating that RPM build has experienced errors.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-koji-fedoramessaging-messages-1.2.5-1.20250310105343640705.pr194.76.g7aec4a2.fc40.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/python3-koji-fedoramessaging-messages/LICENSE

RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-koji-fedoramessaging-messages-1.2.5-1.20250310105343640705.pr194.76.g7aec4a2.fc40.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/python3-koji-fedoramessaging-messages/LICENSE]: [Error denoting missing file with license]


Answer: Issue: Missing license file
Resolution: Set correct `%license` in the specfile
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-koji-fedoramessaging-messages-1.2.5-1.20250310105343640705.pr194.76.g7aec4a2.fc40.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/python3-koji-fedoramessaging-messages/LICENSE

RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-koji-fedoramessaging-messages-1.2.5-1.20250310105343640705.pr194.76.g7aec4a2.fc40.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/python3-koji-fedoramessaging-messages/LICENSE

Answer: Error denoting missing file with license
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: policycoreutils-devel >= 3.8
]: [Package policycoreutils-devel in version of 3.8 and greater is not available in the current repositories.]
=============
[No match for argument: checkpolicy >= 3.8
]: [Package checkpolicy in version of 3.8 and greater is not available in the current repositories.]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
]: [The DNF transaction has failed because some package dependencies can't be satisfied or requested packages are not available.]


Answer: Issue: The DNF transaction is requesting packages which can't be installed from the available repositories.
Resolution: Please make sure all your dependencies are available during the DNF transaction. Also make sure that your package dependencies are correct in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: policycoreutils-devel >= 3.8


Answer: Package policycoreutils-devel in version of 3.8 and greater is not available in the current repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: checkpolicy >= 3.8


Answer: Package checkpolicy in version of 3.8 and greater is not available in the current repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:


Answer: The DNF transaction has failed because some package dependencies can't be satisfied or requested packages are not available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 20:26:17 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1716242'
server exited unexpectedly
:: [ 20:26:17 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Get a screenshot (Expected 0, got 1)]: [Malfunctioning tmux]


Answer: Issue: This is a known issue where the tmux tool core-dumps.
Resolution: Please ask tmux maintainers to fix the tool in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80294
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 20:26:17 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1716242'
server exited unexpectedly
:: [ 20:26:17 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Get a screenshot (Expected 0, got 1)

Answer: Malfunctioning tmux
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ cp -p /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html objdir/dist/bin/browser/chrome/browser/content/browser/default-bookmarks.html
cp: cannot create regular file 'objdir/dist/bin/browser/chrome/browser/content/browser/default-bookmarks.html': No such file or directory
]: [Build failure reason.]


Answer: Issue: Build process is trying to copy a file from location which doesn't exist.
Resolution: Make sure to add valid macros to your cp command to copy file from BUILDROOT folder instead of system root folder. If the file is not available nor generated, remove this reference from the .spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ cp -p /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html objdir/dist/bin/browser/chrome/browser/content/browser/default-bookmarks.html
cp: cannot create regular file 'objdir/dist/bin/browser/chrome/browser/content/browser/default-bookmarks.html': No such file or directory


Answer: Build failure reason.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(apkinspector)]: [The dependency transaction was not resolved.]


Answer: Issue: The python3dist(apkinspector) dependency was not found.
Resolution: Provide the python3dist(apkinspector) dependency for proper build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(apkinspector)

Answer: The dependency transaction was not resolved.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/glfw-3.4-3.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/GLFW]: [It lists the directory which is supposed to be installed but was not found after the installation.]


Answer: Issue: A directory /usr/share/doc/GLFW was supposed to be installed according to the spec file, but it does not exist.
Resolution: Make sure the doc directory is installed properly. In this case, the CMake configuration of the docs has to be adjusted.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/glfw-3.4-3.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/GLFW

Answer: It lists the directory which is supposed to be installed but was not found after the installation.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pat]: [Module 'path' does not exist.]


Answer: Issue: Module 'path' isn't available.
Resolution: Make sure you install the module, or ensure you are importing a submodule from a correct module.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pat

Answer: Module 'path' does not exist.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [29% tests passed, 24 tests failed out of 34
Total Test time (real) =   2.32 sec
The following tests FAILED:
	  3 - clear_primesieve_iterator1 (Failed)
	  4 - clear_primesieve_iterator2 (Failed)
	  5 - count_primes1 (Failed)
	  6 - count_primes2 (Failed)
	  7 - count_primes3 (Failed)
	  8 - count_quadruplets (Failed)
	  9 - count_quintuplets (Failed)
	 10 - count_sextuplets (Failed)
	 11 - count_triplets (Failed)
	 12 - count_twins (Failed)
	 16 - generate_n_primes1 (Failed)
	 17 - generate_n_primes2 (Failed)
	 18 - generate_primes1 (Failed)
	 19 - generate_primes2 (Failed)
	 23 - move_primesieve_iterator (Failed)
	 24 - next_prime1 (Failed)
	 25 - next_prime2 (Failed)
	 26 - nth_prime1 (Failed)
	 27 - nth_prime2 (Failed)
	 28 - nth_prime3 (Failed)
	 30 - prev_prime1 (Failed)
	 31 - prev_prime2 (Failed)
	 32 - skipto_next_prime (Failed)
	 33 - skipto_prev_prime (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zMEVHN (%check)
    %source_date_epoch_from_changelog is set, but %changelog has no entries to take a date from
    %changelog entries must start with *
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zMEVHN (%check)]: [Summary of failed tests.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed in the %check phase due to failing tests.
Resolution: Check the code and tests for possible regressions.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
29% tests passed, 24 tests failed out of 34
Total Test time (real) =   2.32 sec
The following tests FAILED:
	  3 - clear_primesieve_iterator1 (Failed)
	  4 - clear_primesieve_iterator2 (Failed)
	  5 - count_primes1 (Failed)
	  6 - count_primes2 (Failed)
	  7 - count_primes3 (Failed)
	  8 - count_quadruplets (Failed)
	  9 - count_quintuplets (Failed)
	 10 - count_sextuplets (Failed)
	 11 - count_triplets (Failed)
	 12 - count_twins (Failed)
	 16 - generate_n_primes1 (Failed)
	 17 - generate_n_primes2 (Failed)
	 18 - generate_primes1 (Failed)
	 19 - generate_primes2 (Failed)
	 23 - move_primesieve_iterator (Failed)
	 24 - next_prime1 (Failed)
	 25 - next_prime2 (Failed)
	 26 - nth_prime1 (Failed)
	 27 - nth_prime2 (Failed)
	 28 - nth_prime3 (Failed)
	 30 - prev_prime1 (Failed)
	 31 - prev_prime2 (Failed)
	 32 - skipto_next_prime (Failed)
	 33 - skipto_prev_prime (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zMEVHN (%check)
    %source_date_epoch_from_changelog is set, but %changelog has no entries to take a date from
    %changelog entries must start with *
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zMEVHN (%check)

Answer: Summary of failed tests.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [The following tests FAILED:
	  3 - clear_primesieve_iterator1 (Failed)
	  4 - clear_primesieve_iterator2 (Failed)
	  5 - count_primes1 (Failed)
	  6 - count_primes2 (Failed)
	  7 - count_primes3 (Failed)
	  8 - count_quadruplets (Failed)
	  9 - count_quintuplets (Failed)
	 10 - count_sextuplets (Failed)
	 11 - count_triplets (Failed)
	 12 - count_twins (Failed)
	 16 - generate_n_primes1 (Failed)
	 17 - generate_n_primes2 (Failed)
	 18 - generate_primes1 (Failed)
	 19 - generate_primes2 (Failed)
	 23 - move_primesieve_iterator (Failed)
	 24 - next_prime1 (Failed)
	 25 - next_prime2 (Failed)
	 26 - nth_prime1 (Failed)
	 27 - nth_prime2 (Failed)
	 28 - nth_prime3 (Failed)
	 30 - prev_prime1 (Failed)
	 31 - prev_prime2 (Failed)
	 32 - skipto_next_prime (Failed)
	 33 - skipto_prev_prime (Failed)
Errors while running CTest]: [The list of all failed CTest test cases.]


Answer: Issue: The CTest testsuite of the given package failed.
Resolution: Try to analyze and fix the failed test cases, if possible. Alternatively, discuss the failed test cases with upstream.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
The following tests FAILED:
	  3 - clear_primesieve_iterator1 (Failed)
	  4 - clear_primesieve_iterator2 (Failed)
	  5 - count_primes1 (Failed)
	  6 - count_primes2 (Failed)
	  7 - count_primes3 (Failed)
	  8 - count_quadruplets (Failed)
	  9 - count_quintuplets (Failed)
	 10 - count_sextuplets (Failed)
	 11 - count_triplets (Failed)
	 12 - count_twins (Failed)
	 16 - generate_n_primes1 (Failed)
	 17 - generate_n_primes2 (Failed)
	 18 - generate_primes1 (Failed)
	 19 - generate_primes2 (Failed)
	 23 - move_primesieve_iterator (Failed)
	 24 - next_prime1 (Failed)
	 25 - next_prime2 (Failed)
	 26 - nth_prime1 (Failed)
	 27 - nth_prime2 (Failed)
	 28 - nth_prime3 (Failed)
	 30 - prev_prime1 (Failed)
	 31 - prev_prime2 (Failed)
	 32 - skipto_next_prime (Failed)
	 33 - skipto_prev_prime (Failed)
Errors while running CTest

Answer: The list of all failed CTest test cases.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /tmp/tmp.eXRvpwJs1z/BUILDROOT/ansible-pcp-2.4.1-1.el10.x86_64/usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat
]: [Fail of ansible-pcp rebuild]


Answer: Issue: A missing file in ansible-pcp SRPM
Resolution: Ensure the /usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat file is present in the SRPM tar ball
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /tmp/tmp.eXRvpwJs1z/BUILDROOT/ansible-pcp-2.4.1-1.el10.x86_64/usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat


Answer: Fail of ansible-pcp rebuild
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 07:54:07 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: File 'show-bgp-neighbors.log' should contain 'BGP state = Idle' 
]: [Checking the state of BGP failed.]


Answer: Issue: BGP state was not identified as "Idle".
Resolution: In this use case, also the "Active" is the correct one, so it can be either "Idle" or "Active"
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 07:54:07 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: File 'show-bgp-neighbors.log' should contain 'BGP state = Idle' 


Answer: Checking the state of BGP failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/builddir/build/BUILD/glsl-analyzer-1.6.0-build/glsl_analyzer-1.6.0/build.zig:130:53: error: root struct of file 'Build.Step' has no member named 'MakeOptions']: [Zig compiler error message about non-existing struct member.]


Answer: Issue: The zig build script references non-existing struct member of a struct originating from the Zig standard library.
Resolution: The build script is most likely written for a different version of Zig. See the upstream page about used zig version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/builddir/build/BUILD/glsl-analyzer-1.6.0-build/glsl_analyzer-1.6.0/build.zig:130:53: error: root struct of file 'Build.Step' has no member named 'MakeOptions'

Answer: Zig compiler error message about non-existing struct member.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit) needed by cmake-4.0.0~rc4-1.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base
]: [This indicates the problem.]


Answer: Issue: The build is failing because there is no package that provides libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit).
Resolution: Use
dnf repoquery --whatprovides 'libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit)'
to find out which RPM provides the library and either install it or add it as a BuildRequires to your spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit) needed by cmake-4.0.0~rc4-1.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base


Answer: This indicates the problem.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  ['srpm_build_method': 'rpkg',]: [This seems like a build with `rpkg-util`.]
=============
[{'clone_url': 'https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Guard]: [But `clone_url` points at Fedora DistGit (the official one).  This seems wrong, you would typically use the DistGit source method instead of rpkg.]


Answer: Issue: Improperly picked source method.
Resolution: Start using the DistGit method for building your SRPMs. https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#dist-git-method
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
'srpm_build_method': 'rpkg',

Answer: This seems like a build with `rpkg-util`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
{'clone_url': 'https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Guard

Answer: But `clone_url` points at Fedora DistGit (the official one).  This seems wrong, you would typically use the DistGit source method instead of rpkg.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Could not resolve dependencies for project]: [indicates that project dependency resolution failed]
=============
[has not been downloaded from it before]: [indicates that maven artifact is missing]


Answer: Issue: maven build failed due to a missing build dependency
Resolution: add missing dependency as build requires
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Could not resolve dependencies for project

Answer: indicates that project dependency resolution failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
has not been downloaded from it before

Answer: indicates that maven artifact is missing
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(pygments) >= 2.13'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(snowballstemmer) >= 2'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-applehelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-devhelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp) >= 2'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-jsmath)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-qthelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml) >= 1.1.5'
Not all dependencies satisfie]: [Many dependecies not met]


Answer: Issue: Dependencies not found or not existing in used repositories
Resolution: Add repositories that ship the package or check the name of the packages
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(pygments) >= 2.13'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(snowballstemmer) >= 2'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-applehelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-devhelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp) >= 2'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-jsmath)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-qthelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml) >= 1.1.5'
Not all dependencies satisfie

Answer: Many dependecies not met
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_pointer]: [Symbol `g_once_init_enter_pointer` used by `/lib64/libdnf.so.2` was undefined. ]
=============
[[2024-11-28 14:05:55,886][ ERROR][PID:3061771] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failure]: [No success file was found, indicating a build failure.]


Answer: Issue: Symbol `g_once_init_enter_pointer` was undefined. This indicates that the build system lacks some sort of dependency that the `/lib64/libdnf.so.2` binary was built against.
The `g_once_init_enter_pointer` symbol originates from glib2 library. 
Resolution: Ensure that appropriate version of the glib2 library must be present during build, `/lib64/libdnf.so.2` has a build dependency on it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_pointer

Answer: Symbol `g_once_init_enter_pointer` used by `/lib64/libdnf.so.2` was undefined.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[2024-11-28 14:05:55,886][ ERROR][PID:3061771] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failure

Answer: No success file was found, indicating a build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1]: [The build failed in `%build` phase.]
=============
[CMake Generate step failed.  Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.]: [CMake cannot prepare the build environment.]
=============
[CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
  Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
    "/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
  in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES.  Possible reasons include:
  * The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
  * An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
  * The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
  provide.
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
  Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
    "/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
  in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES.  Possible reasons include:
  * The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
  * An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
  * The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
  provide.]: [You are missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed in `%build` phase becase CMake was missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private.
Resolution: You should add build dependency to your spec file:

BuildRequires: qt6-qtbase-private-devel
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1

Answer: The build failed in `%build` phase.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Generate step failed.  Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.

Answer: CMake cannot prepare the build environment.