fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/sfcbd
   /usr/bin/sfcbdump
   /usr/bin/sfcbinst2mof
   /usr/bin/sfcbmof
   /usr/bin/sfcbmofpp
   /usr/bin/sfcbproc
   /usr/bin/sfcbrepos
   /usr/bin/sfcbstage
   /usr/bin/sfcbtrace
   /usr/bin/sfcbunstage
   /usr/bin/sfcbuuid
   /usr/bin/wbemcat
   /usr/bin/xmltest
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbd-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbdump-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbinst2mof-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbmof-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbmofpp-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbproc-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/sfcbtrace-1.4.9-36.fc43.x86_64.debug

Answer: This snippet says why the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Dynamic buildrequires detected
Going to install missing buildrequires. See root.log for details.]: [This indicates that the actual error is to be found in the root.log file.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:461:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "flexiblas-devel-3.4.4-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "gcc-c++-14.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "gcc-gfortran-14.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "pybind11-devel-2.12.0-2.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.12.2-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "python3-devel-3.13.0~b3-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "python3-numpy-f2py-1:1.26.4-7.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  No match for argument: python3dist(array-api-strict)
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "python3-packaging-24.1-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:461:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
]: [This is the dnf transaction that has failed. It lists packages that are already installed, those are irrelevant to the failure, but also packages that failed to install, in this case python3dist(array-api-strict).]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because a dependency on python3dist(array-api-strict) couldn't be satisfied - the package does not exist in Fedora repositories.
Resolution: It is necessary to package the dependency for Fedora and wait until it is available in the repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Dynamic buildrequires detected
Going to install missing buildrequires. See root.log for details.

Answer: This indicates that the actual error is to be found in the root.log file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "flexiblas-devel-3.4.4-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "gcc-c++-14.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "gcc-gfortran-14.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "pybind11-devel-2.12.0-2.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.12.2-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "python3-devel-3.13.0~b3-1.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "python3-numpy-f2py-1:1.26.4-7.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  No match for argument: python3dist(array-api-strict)
DEBUG util.py:461:  Package "python3-packaging-24.1-1.fc41.noarch" is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:461:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:461:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages


Answer: This is the dnf transaction that has failed. It lists packages that are already installed, those are irrelevant to the failure, but also packages that failed to install, in this case python3dist(array-api-strict).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Dependency presentproto found: NO found 1.3 but need: '>= 1.4'
Did not find CMake 'cmake'
Found CMake: NO
Run-time dependency presentproto found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake)
Looking for a fallback subproject for the dependency presentproto

meson.build:83:19: ERROR: Neither a subproject directory nor a xorgproto.wrap file was found.

A full log can be found at /builddir/build/BUILD/xserver-84b6d7e2c50514c40b905e8bf59726436c518cf4/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CM1JbO (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CM1JbO (%build)
]: [This is the specific issue that ended up causing the build to fail.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to a dependency being too old for the project that is being built. In this case presentproto 1.3 was present when 1.4 was required.
Resolution: The version of the software being built needs to be rolled back to a version that can support the older library, or a newer version of that library needs to be built as well.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Dependency presentproto found: NO found 1.3 but need: '>= 1.4'
Did not find CMake 'cmake'
Found CMake: NO
Run-time dependency presentproto found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake)
Looking for a fallback subproject for the dependency presentproto

meson.build:83:19: ERROR: Neither a subproject directory nor a xorgproto.wrap file was found.

A full log can be found at /builddir/build/BUILD/xserver-84b6d7e2c50514c40b905e8bf59726436c518cf4/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CM1JbO (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CM1JbO (%build)


Answer: This is the specific issue that ended up causing the build to fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Empty %files file /builddir/build/BUILD/uxn-1.0-build/uxn-1.0/debugsourcefiles.list
    Empty %files file /builddir/build/BUILD/uxn-1.0-build/uxn-1.0/debugsourcefiles.list]: [Error indicating empty %files for the debug package]


Answer: Issue: The build produced an empty debug package
Resolution: Put the following line at the top of your spec file:

%global debug_package %{nil}
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Empty %files file /builddir/build/BUILD/uxn-1.0-build/uxn-1.0/debugsourcefiles.list
    Empty %files file /builddir/build/BUILD/uxn-1.0-build/uxn-1.0/debugsourcefiles.list

Answer: Error indicating empty %files for the debug package
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.h69kmn (%install)]: [This says the %install part in the specfile failed]
=============
[Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_save_files.py", line 800, in <module>
    main(cli_args)
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_save_files.py", line 746, in main
    file_section, module_names = pyproject_save_files_and_modules(
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_save_files.py", line 727, in pyproject_save_files_and_modules
    generate_file_list(paths_dict, globs, include_auto)
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_save_files.py", line 534, in generate_file_list
    raise ValueError(f"Globs did not match any module: {missed_text}")
ValueError: Globs did not match any module: vercajk-cli]: [This says that pyproject macro tried to safe files from module vercajk-cli but no such module was found.]


Answer: Issue: The pyproject macro for saving files failed, because it was looking for vecajk-cli module, but no such module was found.
Resolution: Rename the project to vercajk-cli to create files the pyproject save files macro can find or pass a name of the project to the macro to specify the name of project. In this case it was vercajk instead of vercajk-cli. The vercajk-cli was name of the package in spec file even though the project itself is named vercajk.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.h69kmn (%install)

Answer: This says the %install part in the specfile failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_save_files.py", line 800, in <module>
    main(cli_args)
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_save_files.py", line 746, in main
    file_section, module_names = pyproject_save_files_and_modules(
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_save_files.py", line 727, in pyproject_save_files_and_modules
    generate_file_list(paths_dict, globs, include_auto)
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_save_files.py", line 534, in generate_file_list
    raise ValueError(f"Globs did not match any module: {missed_text}")
ValueError: Globs did not match any module: vercajk-cli

Answer: This says that pyproject macro tried to safe files from module vercajk-cli but no such module was found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: package wingpanel-devel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires wingpanel(x86-64) = 8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package wingpanel-devel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires libwingpanel.so.8()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides libmutter-15.so.0()(64bit) needed by wingpanel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora
  - nothing provides libmutter-clutter-15.so.0()(64bit) needed by wingpanel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora
  - nothing provides libmutter-cogl-15.so.0()(64bit) needed by wingpanel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates

Copr build error: Build failed]: [This is where the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: The package BuildRequires wingpanel-devel which requires package wingpanel. It can not be installed as it is built against libmutter-15, which is part of GNOME 47. The package is built in rawhide where there is GNOME 48, providing libmutter-16, thus the dependency on libmutter-15 can't be met and the build fails.
Resolution: Rebuild wingpanel in rawhide so it is linked against libmutter-16.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: package wingpanel-devel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires wingpanel(x86-64) = 8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package wingpanel-devel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires libwingpanel.so.8()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides libmutter-15.so.0()(64bit) needed by wingpanel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora
  - nothing provides libmutter-clutter-15.so.0()(64bit) needed by wingpanel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora
  - nothing provides libmutter-cogl-15.so.0()(64bit) needed by wingpanel-8.0.1^20241219.git0baabae-1.fc42.x86_64 from fedora
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates

Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: This is where the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/apr-1.7.3-lmdb-support.patch: No such file or director]: [The patch cannot be found.]


Answer: Issue: There is a patch apr-1.7.3-lmdb-support.patch defined but it cannot be located.
Resolution: Make sure that the patch apr-1.7.3-lmdb-support.patch you defined in your spec file exists and is committed and pushed in the source control.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/apr-1.7.3-lmdb-support.patch: No such file or director

Answer: The patch cannot be found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [checking for sqlite3... no
configure: error: liblastlog2 selected, but required sqlite3 library not available
]: [There is an error when running the configure script during the build.]


Answer: Issue: The sqlite3 library hasn't been found, but it is required for liblastlog2 feature.
Resolution: The sqlite-devel package needs to be added as a BuildRequires in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
checking for sqlite3... no
configure: error: liblastlog2 selected, but required sqlite3 library not available


Answer: There is an error when running the configure script during the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GYUdeD (%check)
    /builddir/build/SPECS/glab.spec line 53: autopatch: no matching patches in range
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GYUdeD (%check)


Answer: The build failed during `%check` phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/bin/sh: line 1: llvm-strip: command not found]: [The build system is trying to use llvm-strip which is not installed.]


Answer: Issue: The build tries to use a tool (llvm-strip) from the llvm package, but the llvm package is not installed.
Resolution: Add BuildRequires: llvm to the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/bin/sh: line 1: llvm-strip: command not found

Answer: The build system is trying to use llvm-strip which is not installed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(journal-to-fedora-messaging-messages) < 2~~ with python3dist(journal-to-fedora-messaging-messages) >= 1)]: [DNF error message about a missing dependency]


Answer: Issue: The package depends on another package that is not available in Fedora yet
Resolution: Add the dependencies in Fedora before trying to build the package that depend on them.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(journal-to-fedora-messaging-messages) < 2~~ with python3dist(journal-to-fedora-messaging-messages) >= 1)

Answer: DNF error message about a missing dependency
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[headless_shell:53/106] ACTION //headless:generate_headless_shell_license_file(//build/toolchain/linux/unbundle:default)
FAILED: LICENSE.headless_shell 
/usr/bin/python3 ../../tools/licenses/licenses.py license_file LICENSE.headless_shell --gn-target //headless:headless_shell --gn-out-dir .
qemu-x86_64-static: Could not open '/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2': No such file or directory]: [The corresponding error messages indicate that an attempt was made to run qemu-x86_64-static and failed because ‘/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2’ is not found in the aarch64 build environment.]


Answer: Issue: After taking a closer look at the bundle binary buildtools/linux64/gn and tools/licenses/licenses.py that was called, I found out that the cause of the build failure lies in bundle-binary gn as it is x86_64 program and cannot run in aarch64 build enviroment.
Resolution: Here is how the build failure can be fixed:

- Replace the bundle x86_64 binary gn with the system gn which is built for aarch64 with the command: cp -f /usr/bin/gn  buildtools/linux64/gn

- Add BuildRequire on gn in the specfile
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[headless_shell:53/106] ACTION //headless:generate_headless_shell_license_file(//build/toolchain/linux/unbundle:default)
FAILED: LICENSE.headless_shell 
/usr/bin/python3 ../../tools/licenses/licenses.py license_file LICENSE.headless_shell --gn-target //headless:headless_shell --gn-out-dir .
qemu-x86_64-static: Could not open '/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2': No such file or directory

Answer: The corresponding error messages indicate that an attempt was made to run qemu-x86_64-static and failed because ‘/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2’ is not found in the aarch64 build environment.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pandas]: [Package 'pandas' is not available.]
=============
[
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(google-api-python-client]: [Package 'google-api-python-client' is not available.]
=============
[
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(google-auth-oauthlib]: [Package 'google-oauth-oauthlib' is not available.]
=============
[Red Hat Enterprise Linux - BaseOS                80 MB/s |  19 MB     00:00
Red Hat Enterprise Linux - AppStream            113 MB/s |  30 MB     00:00
Red Hat Enterprise Linux - CodeReady Linux Buil  31 MB/s | 6.8 MB     00:00
Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 9 - x86_64   27 MB/s |  21 MB     00:00]: [The following repositories are available: Copr, BaseOS, AppStream, CRB, EPEL]


Answer: Issue: Dependencies are not available.
Resolution: Ensure the package depends on packages available in repositories available in the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pandas

Answer: Package 'pandas' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3dist(google-api-python-client

Answer: Package 'google-api-python-client' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3dist(google-auth-oauthlib

Answer: Package 'google-oauth-oauthlib' is not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux - BaseOS                80 MB/s |  19 MB     00:00
Red Hat Enterprise Linux - AppStream            113 MB/s |  30 MB     00:00
Red Hat Enterprise Linux - CodeReady Linux Buil  31 MB/s | 6.8 MB     00:00
Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 9 - x86_64   27 MB/s |  21 MB     00:00

Answer: The following repositories are available: Copr, BaseOS, AppStream, CRB, EPEL
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-asn1-der/default) >= 0.4.0 with crate(picky-asn1-der/default) < 0.5.0~)
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-asn1-x509/default) >= 0.12.0 with crate(picky-asn1-x509/default) < 0.13.0~)
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(tss-esapi/default) >= 7.4.0 with crate(tss-esapi/default) < 8.0.0~)
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(tss-esapi/generate-bindings) >= 7.4.0 with crate(tss-esapi/generate-bindings) < 8.0.0~)]: [There are no RPM packages that satisfy these requirements on those rust crates.]


Answer: Issue: Build dependencies cannot be satisfied.
Resolution: This is not an easy problem to solve.

Your package requires certain packages to be available in concrete versions and dnf cannot satisfy that requirement.

Make sure these requirements are valid. You should check if versions of dependencies that are in repositories are good enough and use those if possible.

If the dependencies are not packaged, you need to either package them yourself, don't require them or work with maintainers in that ecosystem to package them.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-asn1-der/default) >= 0.4.0 with crate(picky-asn1-der/default) < 0.5.0~)
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-asn1-x509/default) >= 0.12.0 with crate(picky-asn1-x509/default) < 0.13.0~)
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(tss-esapi/default) >= 7.4.0 with crate(tss-esapi/default) < 8.0.0~)
DEBUG util.py:461:   Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(tss-esapi/generate-bindings) >= 7.4.0 with crate(tss-esapi/generate-bindings) < 8.0.0~)

Answer: There are no RPM packages that satisfy these requirements on those rust crates.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 20:23:27 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1814526'
server exited unexpectedly
:: [ 20:23:27 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Get a screenshot (Expected 0, got 1)
]: [Reports failure of tmux tool]


Answer: Issue: The tmux tool crashed and was not able to capture a screenshot.
Resolution: This is a known issue. Please ask tmux maintainers to fix it in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80294 .
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 20:23:27 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1814526'
server exited unexpectedly
:: [ 20:23:27 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Get a screenshot (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Reports failure of tmux tool
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:]: [Problem resolving transaction.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(soupsieve) >= 2.6]: [The package python3dist(soupsieve) not found.]


Answer: Issue: The package python3dist(soupsieve) not found. 
Resolution: Provide the package python3dist(soupsieve).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:

Answer: Problem resolving transaction.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(soupsieve) >= 2.6

Answer: The package python3dist(soupsieve) not found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [The cause of the error.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'poetry'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-admin'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-oidc >= 2.0.0'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-xml-rpc'
No matching package to install: 'python3-mrtparse'
No matching package to install: 'python3-sqlalchemy-helpers']: [The list of missing packages]


Answer: Issue: The package has requirements that do not exist in the target distribution
Resolution: You need to package the dependencies first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: The cause of the error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'poetry'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-admin'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-oidc >= 2.0.0'
No matching package to install: 'python3-flask-xml-rpc'
No matching package to install: 'python3-mrtparse'
No matching package to install: 'python3-sqlalchemy-helpers'

Answer: The list of missing packages
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:461:  No matching package to install: 'nodejs-cjs-module-lexer']: [The 'nodejs-cjs-module-lexer' dependency package is not available during build.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:461:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:461:  Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [There are dependencies required for the build which can't be satisfied.]


Answer: Issue: One package dependency can't be found during the build.
Resolution: Verify if the missing package is correct. If yes, find out why it is not available during build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  No matching package to install: 'nodejs-cjs-module-lexer'

Answer: The 'nodejs-cjs-module-lexer' dependency package is not available during build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:461:  Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: There are dependencies required for the build which can't be satisfied.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Additional repo https_yum_theforeman_org_releas 2.1 kB/s | 245  B     00:00    
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'https_yum_theforeman_org_releases_nightly_el8_x86_64':
  - Status code: 404 for https://yum.theforeman.org/releases/nightly/el8/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a04:4e42:400::561)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'https_yum_theforeman_org_releases_nightly_el8_x86_64': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried
]: [This line informs you that your system attempted to access an additional repository for the build process. The URL points to the Foreman project's nightly releases for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (el8) and 64-bit architecture (x86_64).]


Answer: Issue: The provided information indicates an RPM build failure due to an issue downloading metadata for a specific repository.
Resolution: Check the URL: Double-check the provided URL for typos.
Check Copr project announcements: The Copr project might have temporarily disabled nightly releases. Look for announcements on their website or forums.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Additional repo https_yum_theforeman_org_releas 2.1 kB/s | 245  B     00:00    
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'https_yum_theforeman_org_releases_nightly_el8_x86_64':
  - Status code: 404 for https://yum.theforeman.org/releases/nightly/el8/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a04:4e42:400::561)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'https_yum_theforeman_org_releases_nightly_el8_x86_64': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried


Answer: This line informs you that your system attempted to access an additional repository for the build process. The URL points to the Foreman project's nightly releases for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (el8) and 64-bit architecture (x86_64).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dnf-3", line 57, in <module>
    main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 208, in user_main
    errcode = main(args)
              ^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 67, in main
    return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 106, in _main
    return cli_run(cli, base)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 130, in cli_run
    ret = resolving(cli, base)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 183, in resolving
    base.do_transaction(display=displays)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 246, in do_transaction
    self.gpgsigcheck(install_pkgs)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 302, in gpgsigcheck
    self._get_key_for_package(po, fn)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 2552, in _get_key_for_package
    keys = dnf.crypto.retrieve(keyurl, repo)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/crypto.py", line 137, in retrieve
    keyinfos = rawkey2infos(handle)
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/crypto.py", line 127, in rawkey2infos
    keys = libdnf.repo.Key.keysFromFd(key_fo.fileno())
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/repo.py", line 341, in keysFromFd
    return _repo.Key_keysFromFd(fileDescriptor)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
RuntimeError: Parsing armored OpenPGP packet(s) failed]: [It shows the script (dnf-3) which is responsible for the runtime error (the cause of the build failure).]


Answer: Issue: Parsing armored OpenPGP packet(s) failed.
Resolution: Try again.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dnf-3", line 57, in <module>
    main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 208, in user_main
    errcode = main(args)
              ^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 67, in main
    return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 106, in _main
    return cli_run(cli, base)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 130, in cli_run
    ret = resolving(cli, base)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 183, in resolving
    base.do_transaction(display=displays)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 246, in do_transaction
    self.gpgsigcheck(install_pkgs)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 302, in gpgsigcheck
    self._get_key_for_package(po, fn)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 2552, in _get_key_for_package
    keys = dnf.crypto.retrieve(keyurl, repo)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/crypto.py", line 137, in retrieve
    keyinfos = rawkey2infos(handle)
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/crypto.py", line 127, in rawkey2infos
    keys = libdnf.repo.Key.keysFromFd(key_fo.fileno())
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/repo.py", line 341, in keysFromFd
    return _repo.Key_keysFromFd(fileDescriptor)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
RuntimeError: Parsing armored OpenPGP packet(s) failed

Answer: It shows the script (dnf-3) which is responsible for the runtime error (the cause of the build failure).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [The following tests FAILED:

/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.31.6-build/cmake-3.31.6/Source/CTest/cmCTestTestHandler.cxx:716 	  2 - test_api (SEGFAULT)

/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.31.6-build/cmake-3.31.6/Source/CTest/cmCTestTestHandler.cxx:716 	  3 - test_biosimulators (SEGFAULT)

/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.31.6-build/cmake-3.31.6/Source/CTest/cmCTestTestHandler.cxx:716 	 14 - test_sanity (SEGFAULT)

/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.31.6-build/cmake-3.31.6/Source/cmCTest.cxx:1031 Errors while running CTest]: [Failed build tests.]


Answer: Issue: Tests failed.
Resolution: Fix the tests/build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
The following tests FAILED:

/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.31.6-build/cmake-3.31.6/Source/CTest/cmCTestTestHandler.cxx:716 	  2 - test_api (SEGFAULT)

/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.31.6-build/cmake-3.31.6/Source/CTest/cmCTestTestHandler.cxx:716 	  3 - test_biosimulators (SEGFAULT)

/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.31.6-build/cmake-3.31.6/Source/CTest/cmCTestTestHandler.cxx:716 	 14 - test_sanity (SEGFAULT)

/builddir/build/BUILD/cmake-3.31.6-build/cmake-3.31.6/Source/cmCTest.cxx:1031 Errors while running CTest

Answer: Failed build tests.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [cp: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/xonsh-0.19.8-build/xonsh-0.19.8/CHANGELOG.rst': No such file or directory]: [This line shows that the %files section of the spec file tried to use the %doc file attribute with a relative path, which should copy the named file from the build directory to the buildroot directory.]


Answer: Issue: This build involves a new upstream version of the software.  This new version switches the changelog file from the reStructuredText format (.rst) to Markdown (.md).
Resolution: In the %files section use the filename CHANGELOG.md instead of CHANGELOG.rst.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
cp: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/xonsh-0.19.8-build/xonsh-0.19.8/CHANGELOG.rst': No such file or directory

Answer: This line shows that the %files section of the spec file tried to use the %doc file attribute with a relative path, which should copy the named file from the build directory to the buildroot directory.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [====== 11 failed, 217 passed, 7 skipped, 3 warnings in 577.92s (0:09:37) =======]: [There are 11 failed unit tests which caused build aborting.]
=============
[FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_local_override_global
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_negative[p0-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_negative[pgbouncer-pgbouncer]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_negative[pgbouncer-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_positive[p0-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_positive[pgbouncer-pgbouncer]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_global_positive[pgbouncer-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_decrement[p0-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_negative[client_limit_db-muser1]
FAILED test/test_limits.py::test_max_db_client_connections_positive[client_limit_db-muser1]
FAILED test/test_load_balance_hosts.py::test_load_balance_hosts_reload - Asse...]: [There are specific failed tests. ]


Answer: Issue: The unit tests did not passed on i686 architecture.
Resolution: Fix the unit tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
====== 11 failed, 217 passed, 7 skipped, 3 warnings in 577.92s (0:09:37) =======

Answer: There are 11 failed unit tests which caused build aborting.