fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: package python3-pydantic-2.5.3-1.fc40.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.i686
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.x86_64
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [DNF5 couldn't install `python3-pydantic-2.5.3-1.fc40.noarch` as the best find the best candidate for dependency `python(abi) = 3.12` had conflicts with  `python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40`.]
=============
[Copr build error: Build failed]: [The snippet contains final build failure report.]
=============
[Problem: package python3-pydantic-2.5.3-1.fc40.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.x86_64
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.i686
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job]: [Final attempt by DNF5 package manager to resolve dependency conflicts has failed.]


Answer: Issue: Package dependencies couldn't be installed as they were in mutual conflicts.
Resolution: Relax constraints on dependencies, or ensure the appropriate versions are available at build time.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: package python3-pydantic-2.5.3-1.fc40.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.i686
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.x86_64
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job

Answer: DNF5 couldn't install `python3-pydantic-2.5.3-1.fc40.noarch` as the best find the best candidate for dependency `python(abi) = 3.12` had conflicts with  `python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: The snippet contains final build failure report.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: package python3-pydantic-2.5.3-1.fc40.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.x86_64
  - package python3-devel-3.13.0~a3-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~a3-1.fc40 provided by python3-3.12.1-2.fc40.i686
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job

Answer: Final attempt by DNF5 package manager to resolve dependency conflicts has failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [xsltproc --nonet -o doc/ambiguous_words.1 http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl -
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
warning: failed to load external entity "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl"
]: [Build failure reason.]


Answer: Issue: The build process is trying to download data from the internet. This is not allowed as per Fedora Packaging guidelines.
Resolution: Remove requirement of downloading data from the internet.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
xsltproc --nonet -o doc/ambiguous_words.1 http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl -
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
warning: failed to load external entity "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl"


Answer: Build failure reason.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    #display_table([{:a => 1, :nested => {:key => 'value'}}]) - returns "    +---+-----------------+\n    | a | nested          |\n    +---+-----------------+\n    | 1 | {:key=>\"value\"} |\n    +---+-----------------+\n"
      expected => "    +---+-----------------+\n    | a | nested          |\n    +---+-----------------+\n    | 1 | {:key=>\"value\"} |\n    +---+-----------------+\n"
      returned => "    +---+----------------+\n    | a | nested         |\n    +---+----------------+\n    | 1 | {key: \"value\"} |\n    +---+----------------+\n"
]: [Test suite error]


Answer: Issue: Test suite error in `%check` section. The output is changing with settings of tty.
Resolution: Fix the test suite (the issue is related to https://github.com/geemus/formatador/issues/56) or ignore the failing test case.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    #display_table([{:a => 1, :nested => {:key => 'value'}}]) - returns "    +---+-----------------+\n    | a | nested          |\n    +---+-----------------+\n    | 1 | {:key=>\"value\"} |\n    +---+-----------------+\n"
      expected => "    +---+-----------------+\n    | a | nested          |\n    +---+-----------------+\n    | 1 | {:key=>\"value\"} |\n    +---+-----------------+\n"
      returned => "    +---+----------------+\n    | a | nested         |\n    +---+----------------+\n    | 1 | {key: \"value\"} |\n    +---+----------------+\n"


Answer: Test suite error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/bin/g++ -DAPT_DOMAIN=\"libapt-pkg6.0\" -D_WITH_GETLINE=1 -Dapt_pkg_EXPORTS -I/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/redhat-linux-build/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/redhat-linux-build/include/apt-pkg -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -std=gnu++17 -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-align -Wlogical-op -Wredundant-decls -Wmissing-declarations -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations -Wctor-dtor-privacy -Wdisabled-optimization -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wnoexcept -Wsign-promo -Wundef -Wdouble-promotion -Wsuggest-override -Werror=suggest-override -Werror=return-type -MD -MT apt-pkg/CMakeFiles/apt-pkg.dir/contrib/strutl.cc.o -MF apt-pkg/CMakeFiles/apt-pkg.dir/contrib/strutl.cc.o.d -o apt-pkg/CMakeFiles/apt-pkg.dir/contrib/strutl.cc.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/apt-pkg/contrib/strutl.cc
/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/apt-pkg/contrib/strutl.cc: In function ‘std::string Base64Encode(const std::string&)’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/apt-pkg/contrib/strutl.cc:597:7: error: ‘uint8_t’ was not declared in this scope
  597 |       uint8_t Bits[3] = {0,0,0};
      |       ^~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/apt-pkg/contrib/strutl.cc:52:8: note: ‘uint8_t’ is defined in header ‘<cstdint>’; this is probably fixable by adding ‘#include <cstdint>’
   51 | #include <apti18n.h>
  +++ |+#include <cstdint>
   52 |                                                                         /*}}}*/]: [This is a compilation failure.]


Answer: Issue: GCC 15 shuffled header files and cstdint header file stopped to be implicitly included. That caused the "uint8_t" type not to be declared.
Resolution: Include <cstdint> header file into the source file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/g++ -DAPT_DOMAIN=\"libapt-pkg6.0\" -D_WITH_GETLINE=1 -Dapt_pkg_EXPORTS -I/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/redhat-linux-build/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/redhat-linux-build/include/apt-pkg -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -std=gnu++17 -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-align -Wlogical-op -Wredundant-decls -Wmissing-declarations -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations -Wctor-dtor-privacy -Wdisabled-optimization -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wnoexcept -Wsign-promo -Wundef -Wdouble-promotion -Wsuggest-override -Werror=suggest-override -Werror=return-type -MD -MT apt-pkg/CMakeFiles/apt-pkg.dir/contrib/strutl.cc.o -MF apt-pkg/CMakeFiles/apt-pkg.dir/contrib/strutl.cc.o.d -o apt-pkg/CMakeFiles/apt-pkg.dir/contrib/strutl.cc.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/apt-pkg/contrib/strutl.cc
/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/apt-pkg/contrib/strutl.cc: In function ‘std::string Base64Encode(const std::string&)’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/apt-pkg/contrib/strutl.cc:597:7: error: ‘uint8_t’ was not declared in this scope
  597 |       uint8_t Bits[3] = {0,0,0};
      |       ^~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/apt-2.9.8-build/apt-2.9.8/apt-pkg/contrib/strutl.cc:52:8: note: ‘uint8_t’ is defined in header ‘<cstdint>’; this is probably fixable by adding ‘#include <cstdint>’
   51 | #include <apti18n.h>
  +++ |+#include <cstdint>
   52 |                                                                         /*}}}*/

Answer: This is a compilation failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.12 needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(cleo) < 3~~ with python3.12dist(cleo) >= 2.1) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(packaging) >= 23.1 needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(requests-toolbelt) < 2~~ with python3.12dist(requests-toolbelt) >= 1) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(build) < 2~~ with python3.12dist(build) >= 1.0.3) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(cachecontrol) < 0.15~~ with python3.12dist(cachecontrol) >= 0.14) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(cachecontrol[filecache]) < 0.15~~ with python3.12dist(cachecontrol[filecache]) >= 0.14) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(crashtest) < 0.5~~ with python3.12dist(crashtest) >= 0.4.1) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(dulwich) < 0.22~~ with python3.12dist(dulwich) >= 0.21.2) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(fastjsonschema) < 3~~ with python3.12dist(fastjsonschema) >= 2.18) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(installer) < 0.8~~ with python3.12dist(installer) >= 0.7) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(pexpect) < 5~~ with python3.12dist(pexpect) >= 4.7) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(pkginfo) < 2~~ with python3.12dist(pkginfo) >= 1.10) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(pyproject-hooks) < 2~~ with python3.12dist(pyproject-hooks) >= 1) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides (python3.12dist(tomlkit) < 1~~ with python3.12dist(tomlkit) >= 0.11.4) needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(poetry-core) = 1.9 needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base
  - nothing provides python3.12dist(trove-classifiers) >= 2022.5.19 needed by python3-poetry-1.8.3-1.fc41.noarch from copr_base

Answer: The python-poetry package required a few libraries which are not available in the given python 3.12 version during the build.

The required python3 packages are:
- cleo
- packaging
- requests-toolbelt
- build
- cachecontrol
- cachecontrol[filecache]
- crashtest
- dulwich
- fastjsonschema
- installer
- pexpect
- pkginfo
- pyproject-hooks
- tomlkit
- poetry-core
- trove-classifiers
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [PHPUnit 12.1.5 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.]: [The test suite is using PHPUnit version 12.1.5]
=============
[FAILURES!
Tests: 16, Assertions: 14, Failures: 2, PHPUnit Deprecations: 1, Skipped: 2.
]: [This is the test suite summary.
Test suite have failures.]
=============
[1) /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/end-to-end/patch-coverage/valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt
Failed asserting that string matches format description.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
 phpcov 11.0.0 by Sebastian Bergmann.
 
-Unable to detect executable lines that were changed.
-Are you sure your --path-prefix is correct?
-int(2)
+
+Fatal error: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign __PHP_Incomplete_Class to property SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\CodeCoverage::$analyser of type ?SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\StaticAnalysis\FileAnalyser in /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov:2
+Stack trace:
+#0 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov(2): unserialize()
+#1 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/PatchCoverage.php(35): include('...')
+#2 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/cli/PatchCoverageCommand.php(41): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\PatchCoverage->execute()
+#3 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/cli/Application.php(52): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\PatchCoverageCommand->run()
+#4 Standard input code(10): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\Application->run()
+#5 {main}
+  thrown in /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov on line 2
/builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/end-to-end/patch-coverage/valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt:19
]: [This is the detailed failure description, with diff from expected and actual output]


Answer: Issue: PHP raises a TypeError exception because of __PHP_Incomplete_Class. 
This may be related to serialization and missing extension
Resolution: Analyse the valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt unit test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
PHPUnit 12.1.5 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.

Answer: The test suite is using PHPUnit version 12.1.5
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILURES!
Tests: 16, Assertions: 14, Failures: 2, PHPUnit Deprecations: 1, Skipped: 2.


Answer: This is the test suite summary.
Test suite have failures.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1) /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/end-to-end/patch-coverage/valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt
Failed asserting that string matches format description.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
 phpcov 11.0.0 by Sebastian Bergmann.
 
-Unable to detect executable lines that were changed.
-Are you sure your --path-prefix is correct?
-int(2)
+
+Fatal error: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign __PHP_Incomplete_Class to property SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\CodeCoverage::$analyser of type ?SebastianBergmann\CodeCoverage\StaticAnalysis\FileAnalyser in /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov:2
+Stack trace:
+#0 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov(2): unserialize()
+#1 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/PatchCoverage.php(35): include('...')
+#2 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/cli/PatchCoverageCommand.php(41): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\PatchCoverage->execute()
+#3 /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/PHPCOV/cli/Application.php(52): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\PatchCoverageCommand->run()
+#4 Standard input code(10): SebastianBergmann\PHPCOV\Application->run()
+#5 {main}
+  thrown in /builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/fixture/example/coverage/testGreetsWorld.cov on line 2
/builddir/build/BUILD/phpcov-11.0.0-build/phpcov-491eef985e63f351eb997ba02cf76cdf749f2043/tests/end-to-end/patch-coverage/valid-arguments-with-invalid-path-prefix.phpt:19


Answer: This is the detailed failure description, with diff from expected and actual output
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 795794 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
]: [Core-dump record of /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python]


Answer: Issue: The underlying bcc has core-dumped.
Resolution: This is a known issue on older llvm (see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-70250 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-66060) If this re-occures, please report it to the bcc team (kernel).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 795794 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python


Answer: Core-dump record of /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'python3dist(rich) >= 14'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [It describes the error reported by dnf.]
=============
[Handling hatchling from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: hatchling
Handling hatch-vcs from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: hatch-vcs
Exiting dependency generation pass: build backend]: [Indicates the package being built is a Python package using Hatch to control its build process and dependencies.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the package required a dependency that was not available in the required version.
Resolution: Inspect the package requirements and make sure all required packages are indeed available in the target distribution, and update the requirements as necessary. Since the package in question is a Python package, and it uses Hatch and pyproject.toml for its packaging, the dependencies are most likely stored in pyproject.toml rather than in the specfile. Look for `dependencies` keys in the pyproject.toml file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(rich) >= 14'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: It describes the error reported by dnf.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Handling hatchling from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: hatchling
Handling hatch-vcs from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: hatch-vcs
Exiting dependency generation pass: build backend

Answer: Indicates the package being built is a Python package using Hatch to control its build process and dependencies.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python3.14dist(pydantic-core) = 2.27.2 needed by python3-pydantic-2.10.6-2.fc43.noarch from copr_base]: [dnf buildep output showing error]


Answer: Issue: Dependency is missing.
Resolution: Make sure the dnf dependency is installable on the build system.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python3.14dist(pydantic-core) = 2.27.2 needed by python3-pydantic-2.10.6-2.fc43.noarch from copr_base

Answer: dnf buildep output showing error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(drm/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(drm/default) < 0.10.0~]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: The package did not have the right version available
Resolution: Package rust-drm between 0.9.0 and 0.10.0
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(drm/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(drm/default) < 0.10.0~

Answer: Error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [tests/executors/test_executor.py:71: in <module>
    @pytest.mark.flaky(
/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/_pytest/mark/structures.py:546: in __getattr__
    warnings.warn(
E   pytest.PytestUnknownMarkWarning: Unknown pytest.mark.flaky]: [These lines indicate that pytest encountered an unknown marker.]


Answer: Issue: Pytest markers are often provided by pytest plugins.  In this case, pytest.mark.flaky is provided by pytest-rerunfailures.  That is not installed in the build environment, resulting in the unknown mark error.
Resolution: Add a build requirement on python3-pytest-rerunfailures so that it is present in the build environment.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tests/executors/test_executor.py:71: in <module>
    @pytest.mark.flaky(
/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/_pytest/mark/structures.py:546: in __getattr__
    warnings.warn(
E   pytest.PytestUnknownMarkWarning: Unknown pytest.mark.flaky

Answer: These lines indicate that pytest encountered an unknown marker.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [semanageswig_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_semanage_get_hll_compiler_path':
semanageswig_wrap.c:4209:17: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
 4209 |     resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, SWIG_FromCharPtr(*arg3));
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
 1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_semanage_module_extract':
semanageswig_wrap.c:5045:17: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
 5045 |     resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, SWIG_NewPointerObj(*arg6, SWIGTYPE_p_semanage_module_info, 0));
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
 1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Build failed because function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput' expected 3 arguments.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to changes in SWIG 4.3.0.
There is new declaration of SWIG_Python_AppendOutput is now:
SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void);
The 3rd parameter is new and the new $isvoid special variable  should be passed to it.
Resolution: There are two ways how to solve it.
* Add the 3rd parameter to indicate whether or not the wrapped function returns void.

* or also consider replacing with:
SWIG_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj);
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
semanageswig_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_semanage_get_hll_compiler_path':
semanageswig_wrap.c:4209:17: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
 4209 |     resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, SWIG_FromCharPtr(*arg3));
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
 1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_semanage_module_extract':
semanageswig_wrap.c:5045:17: error: too few arguments to function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput'
 5045 |     resultobj = SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(resultobj, SWIG_NewPointerObj(*arg6, SWIGTYPE_p_semanage_module_info, 0));
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
semanageswig_wrap.c:1259:1: note: declared here
 1259 | SWIG_Python_AppendOutput(PyObject* result, PyObject* obj, int is_void) {
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Build failed because function 'SWIG_Python_AppendOutput' expected 3 arguments.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:233 (message):
  Could NOT find RAPTOR (missing: RAPTOR_LIBRARY RAPTOR_INCLUDE_DIR)]: [CMake can't find definition of the mentioned options.]


Answer: Issue: Until the missing CMake options are not defined, it won't work.
Resolution: There are two ways to resolve this.

First to define the missing options to the cmake build.

The second is to turn off the RAPTOR by defining the `-DCOPASI_USE_RAPTOR:BOOL=OFF`
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:233 (message):
  Could NOT find RAPTOR (missing: RAPTOR_LIBRARY RAPTOR_INCLUDE_DIR)

Answer: CMake can't find definition of the mentioned options.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.crCZP8 (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.crCZP8 (%check)
Child return code was: 1
]: [The build failed in %check section.]
=============
[-Ddomain_prefix=org.gnome.FlatpakApp]: [This is a Flatpak build.]
=============
[+ for f in tracker-miner-fs-3.service tracker-miner-fs-control-3.service tracker-writeback-3.service
+ test -f /builddir/build/BUILD/tracker-miners-3.7.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/systemd/user/tracker-miner-fs-3.service]: [This is test of systemd unit files.]


Answer: Issue: Systemd unit files are in this case of Flatpak build irrelevant.
Resolution: You can skip the %check section for flatpak build by adding this condition:

%if ! 0%{?flatpak}
%check 
...
%endif
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.crCZP8 (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.crCZP8 (%check)
Child return code was: 1


Answer: The build failed in %check section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
-Ddomain_prefix=org.gnome.FlatpakApp

Answer: This is a Flatpak build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ for f in tracker-miner-fs-3.service tracker-miner-fs-control-3.service tracker-writeback-3.service
+ test -f /builddir/build/BUILD/tracker-miners-3.7.4-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/systemd/user/tracker-miner-fs-3.service

Answer: This is test of systemd unit files.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/libsndfile-1.2.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libsndfile.sox
]: [rpmbuild error that caused build failure ]


Answer: Issue: spec file list a file in %files section that was not found
Resolution: Check %files section for changes and typos. New versions may have renamed or removed a file. Also some change in buildroot environment may cause some files not to be created, consult configure script.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/libsndfile-1.2.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/libsndfile.sox


Answer: rpmbuild error that caused build failure
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CC=clang]: [clang is being used as the C compiler.]
=============
[CXX=clang++]: [clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler.]
=============
[g++: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ]: [This is the error message for the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed, because the RPM spec file set clang as the C compiler, but the package has hard-coded the C compiler to gcc.  Therefore, gcc is failing, because it is trying to use compiler flags intended for clang.
Resolution: Fix the package to not hard-code gcc as the C compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CC=clang

Answer: clang is being used as the C compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CXX=clang++

Answer: clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
g++: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ

Answer: This is the error message for the build failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [interface/dataedit.c:212:46: error: passing argument 2 of ‘XawListChange’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]]: [The relevant error message saying that type of the second argument passed to the 'XawListChange' function is of incompatible type.]
=============
[  212 |         XawListChange( dataedit_list_widget, list_text, 0, 0, True );
      |                                              ^~~~~~~~~
      |                                              |
      |                                              char **]: [The relevant compiler hint saying that the argument type being passed in is of 'char **' type.]
=============
[/usr/include/X11/Xaw/List.h:170:27: note: expected ‘const char **’ but argument is of type ‘char **’
  170 |  _Xconst char           **list,
      |                           ^]: [The relevant compiler hint saying that the 'XawListChange' function definition is expecting argument of type 'const char **’.]


Answer: Issue: Argument of an incompatible data type has been passed in the function.
Resolution: Either typecast the 'list_text' argument to '(const char **)' or rework the memory ownership of the 'list_text' variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
interface/dataedit.c:212:46: error: passing argument 2 of ‘XawListChange’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]

Answer: The relevant error message saying that type of the second argument passed to the 'XawListChange' function is of incompatible type.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  212 |         XawListChange( dataedit_list_widget, list_text, 0, 0, True );
      |                                              ^~~~~~~~~
      |                                              |
      |                                              char **

Answer: The relevant compiler hint saying that the argument type being passed in is of 'char **' type.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/include/X11/Xaw/List.h:170:27: note: expected ‘const char **’ but argument is of type ‘char **’
  170 |  _Xconst char           **list,
      |                           ^

Answer: The relevant compiler hint saying that the 'XawListChange' function definition is expecting argument of type 'const char **’.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:   Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(clap_complete/default) >= 4.5.47 with crate(clap_complete/default) < 5.0.0~)]: [There is error in providing dependency in specific version.]


Answer: Issue: There is error in providing dependency crate(clap_complete/default) in specific version.
Resolution: Provide dependency in proper version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:   Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(clap_complete/default) >= 4.5.47 with crate(clap_complete/default) < 5.0.0~)

Answer: There is error in providing dependency in specific version.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750238802.372176/root/ --releasever 43 /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750238802.372176/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/awscli2-2.27.0-1.fc43.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
]: [dnf command that failed]
=============
[No match for argument: python3dist(awscrt) >= 0.25.4]: [build dependency that is missing]


Answer: Issue: Build dependency is missing.
Resolution: Ensure that dnf has repositories with all needed build dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf5 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750238802.372176/root/ --releasever 43 /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1750238802.372176/root/builddir/build/SRPMS/awscli2-2.27.0-1.fc43.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts


Answer: dnf command that failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(awscrt) >= 0.25.4

Answer: build dependency that is missing
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:05 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Running 'alternatives --set mta /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail'
/usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail has not been configured as an alternative for mta
:: [ 14:40:05 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'alternatives --set mta /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail' (Expected 0, got 2)

Answer: alternatives command failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 14:40:05 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Service must start without problem (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Failure caused by the alternative not being configured correctly.a