fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [  1) Capybara.register_driver should add a new driver
     Failure/Error: expect(session.body).to include('Hello world!')
       expected "Host not permitted" to include "Hello world!"
     # ./spec/capybara_spec.rb:37:in 'block (3 levels) in <top (required)>']: [One of the multiple test failures]


Answer: Issue: Rack::Protection introduced `Rack::Protection::HostAuthorization` which emits this error:

https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/commit/cd3e00de20ddaff34ea30f7a74a7b9dad189d1d8
Resolution: Disable the check or enable the hosts:

https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/issues/2065#issuecomment-2484285707
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  1) Capybara.register_driver should add a new driver
     Failure/Error: expect(session.body).to include('Hello world!')
       expected "Host not permitted" to include "Hello world!"
     # ./spec/capybara_spec.rb:37:in 'block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

Answer: One of the multiple test failures
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.HiRBka (%check)]: [Mentions which phase of rpmbuild has failed]
=============
[ ERROR
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Last 13 lines of output:
  * ``` sh
  * -- nothing to show --
  * ```
  * 
  * </details>
  Backtrace:
      ▆
   1. └─testthat::expect_match(out, "Traceback", all = FALSE) at test-reprex.R:79:3
   2.   └─testthat:::expect_match_(...)
  
  [ FAIL 3 | WARN 0 | SKIP 65 | PASS 60 ]]: [Output of the failure from Internal test suite, which is run in the %check phase]


Answer: Issue: The %check phase has failed
Resolution: Try to reproduce the failed test and resolve the problem found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.HiRBka (%check)

Answer: Mentions which phase of rpmbuild has failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 ERROR
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Last 13 lines of output:
  * ``` sh
  * -- nothing to show --
  * ```
  * 
  * </details>
  Backtrace:
      ▆
   1. └─testthat::expect_match(out, "Traceback", all = FALSE) at test-reprex.R:79:3
   2.   └─testthat:::expect_match_(...)
  
  [ FAIL 3 | WARN 0 | SKIP 65 | PASS 60 ]

Answer: Output of the failure from Internal test suite, which is run in the %check phase
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ install -m 0644 etc/leapp/actor_conf.d/ipu.yaml '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d']: [specfile contains instruction to install the file `etc/leapp/actor_conf.d/ipu.yaml` into '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d']
=============
[install: cannot create regular file '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d': No such file or directory]: [Tells that there is no such directory '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d'.]


Answer: Issue: The install section of a specfile copies a file into the '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d' directory, but there is no such directory in the build environment.
Resolution: Add an `install` line to the specfile that will create the target directory prior to copying `etc/leapp/actor_conf.d/ipu.yaml` into it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ install -m 0644 etc/leapp/actor_conf.d/ipu.yaml '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d'

Answer: specfile contains instruction to install the file `etc/leapp/actor_conf.d/ipu.yaml` into '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d'
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
install: cannot create regular file '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d': No such file or directory

Answer: Tells that there is no such directory '%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/leapp/actor_conf.d'.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/libexec/gpgverify --keyring=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper.keyring --signature=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc --data=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz
gpgv: Signature made Tue May  6 08:09:40 2025 UTC
gpgv:                using RSA key FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
gpgv: BAD signature from "Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com>"
gpgverify: Signature verification failed.]: [The gpgv signature verification failed for the socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc file.]


Answer: Issue: The gpg signature failed to be verified, either it was signed incorrectly or the file was uploaded incorrectly.
Resolution: Make sure the socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc file has the correct signature before uploading it and that it is the file that you wanted to upload.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/libexec/gpgverify --keyring=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper.keyring --signature=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc --data=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz
gpgv: Signature made Tue May  6 08:09:40 2025 UTC
gpgv:                using RSA key FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
gpgv: BAD signature from "Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com>"
gpgverify: Signature verification failed.

Answer: The gpgv signature verification failed for the socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/php -n run-tests.php -q --show-diff -j6
=====================================================================
PHP         : /usr/bin/php 
PHP_SAPI    : cli
PHP_VERSION : 8.4.8RC1
ZEND_VERSION: 4.4.8RC1
PHP_OS      : Linux - Linux 3b9e49f7dc8d4a778714889bccc53529 6.14.5-200.fc41.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri May  2 14:06:21 UTC 2025 x86_64
INI actual  : /builddir/build/BUILD/php-pecl-rpminfo-1.2.0-build/php-pecl-rpminfo-1.2.0/rpminfo-1.2.0
More .INIs  :  ]: [This show the test suite is a standard PHP extensio n test suite, using run-test.php]
=============
[TEST 11/14 [3/6 concurrent test workers running]
                                                 
========DIFF========
001- string(%d) "4.%s"
001+ string(7) "5.99.90"
     Done
========DONE========
FAIL Check for RPMVERSION constant [tests/004-constants.phpt] ]: [This is the diff for the failed test]


Answer: Issue: Expected output is "4.%s", but actual is "5.99.90"
This is the rpm version, which was bumped from 4.x to 5.x
Resolution: The unit test need to be skipped of fix upstream to allow new RPM verison 5
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/php -n run-tests.php -q --show-diff -j6
=====================================================================
PHP         : /usr/bin/php 
PHP_SAPI    : cli
PHP_VERSION : 8.4.8RC1
ZEND_VERSION: 4.4.8RC1
PHP_OS      : Linux - Linux 3b9e49f7dc8d4a778714889bccc53529 6.14.5-200.fc41.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri May  2 14:06:21 UTC 2025 x86_64
INI actual  : /builddir/build/BUILD/php-pecl-rpminfo-1.2.0-build/php-pecl-rpminfo-1.2.0/rpminfo-1.2.0
More .INIs  :  

Answer: This show the test suite is a standard PHP extensio n test suite, using run-test.php
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
TEST 11/14 [3/6 concurrent test workers running]
                                                 
========DIFF========
001- string(%d) "4.%s"
001+ string(7) "5.99.90"
     Done
========DONE========
FAIL Check for RPMVERSION constant [tests/004-constants.phpt] 

Answer: This is the diff for the failed test
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/script: line 1: fedpkg: command not found]: [a command is missing]


Answer: Issue: fedpkg or fedpkg-minimal was not installed in the buildroot
Resolution: Add fedpkg-minimal to the list of packages required to build the SRPM
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/script: line 1: fedpkg: command not found

Answer: a command is missing
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DLPss6 (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DLPss6 (%check)

Answer: rpm build failed during the %check phase
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error from server (AlreadyExists): project.project.openshift.io "sclorg-test-27902" already exists
Error from server (NotFound): error when creating "/root/.docker_credentials/rhel/registry_redhat_io_login_secret": namespaces "sclorg-test-28869" not found
Error from server (NotFound): namespaces "sclorg-test-28869" not found
error: you do not have rights to view project "sclorg-test-28869" specified in your config or the project doesn't exist
Uploading image rhel8/mariadb-1011:1 as mariadb:10.11 into OpenShift internal registry.
OCP4 loging address is default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com.
Login Succeeded!
Login to default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com was successfully.
Error: normalizing name "default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com//mariadb:10.11": normalizing name "default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com//mariadb:10.11": invalid reference format
Error: invalid reference format
]: [Creating project in OpenShift 4 cluster failed. The messages said that we are not able to get default route URL because of project does not exist.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the new default routing address points to not existing one
Resolution: Delete old project that is used and create a new one that can be used or fix the test suite.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error from server (AlreadyExists): project.project.openshift.io "sclorg-test-27902" already exists
Error from server (NotFound): error when creating "/root/.docker_credentials/rhel/registry_redhat_io_login_secret": namespaces "sclorg-test-28869" not found
Error from server (NotFound): namespaces "sclorg-test-28869" not found
error: you do not have rights to view project "sclorg-test-28869" specified in your config or the project doesn't exist
Uploading image rhel8/mariadb-1011:1 as mariadb:10.11 into OpenShift internal registry.
OCP4 loging address is default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com.
Login Succeeded!
Login to default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com was successfully.
Error: normalizing name "default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com//mariadb:10.11": normalizing name "default-route-openshift-image-registry.apps.ocp4-apps-stacks.hosted.psi.rdu2.redhat.com//mariadb:10.11": invalid reference format
Error: invalid reference format


Answer: Creating project in OpenShift 4 cluster failed. The messages said that we are not able to get default route URL because of project does not exist.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ ruby -Ilib -rminitest/autorun -e 'Dir.glob "./test/**/*_test.rb", &method(:require)'
/usr/share/ruby/did_you_mean/core_ext/name_error.rb:11: warning: csv is not part of the default gems starting from Ruby 3.4.0. Install csv from RubyGems.
<internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require': cannot load such file -- csv (LoadError)
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-fakefs-2.4.0-build/fakefs-2.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/fakefs-2.4.0/test/fakefs_test.rb:2:in '<top (required)>'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:dir>:412:in 'Dir.glob'
	from -e:1:in '<main>']: [This warning specifies the reason for the test failure. As it describes "csv is not part of the default gems starting from Ruby 3.4.0."]


Answer: Issue: Test files could not load a required rubygem library. 
Resolution: Add "BuildRequires: rubygem(csv)" to the specfile to install the required library.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ ruby -Ilib -rminitest/autorun -e 'Dir.glob "./test/**/*_test.rb", &method(:require)'
/usr/share/ruby/did_you_mean/core_ext/name_error.rb:11: warning: csv is not part of the default gems starting from Ruby 3.4.0. Install csv from RubyGems.
<internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require': cannot load such file -- csv (LoadError)
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-fakefs-2.4.0-build/fakefs-2.4.0/usr/share/gems/gems/fakefs-2.4.0/test/fakefs_test.rb:2:in '<top (required)>'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:136:in 'Kernel#require'
	from <internal:dir>:412:in 'Dir.glob'
	from -e:1:in '<main>'

Answer: This warning specifies the reason for the test failure. As it describes "csv is not part of the default gems starting from Ruby 3.4.0."
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [1 tests of 338 FAILED]: [summary of the test results from %check phase]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YekG4N (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YekG4N (%check)]: [reasoning of the make why the rpm build failed]
=============
[         lsfd: UNIX dgram sockets: [03] ENDPOINTS-column     ... FAILED (lsfd/mkfds-unix-dgram-ENDPOINTS-column)
]: [specific subtest that failed]
=============
[         lsfd: UNIX dgram sockets                            ... FAILED (1 from 4 sub-tests)
]: [summary of the group of tests that failed]


Answer: Issue: Test suite that's run during the %check phase of rpm build has not passed
Resolution: Fix the specific test (related to lsfd and UNIX datagram sockets).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1 tests of 338 FAILED

Answer: summary of the test results from %check phase
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YekG4N (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YekG4N (%check)

Answer: reasoning of the make why the rpm build failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
         lsfd: UNIX dgram sockets: [03] ENDPOINTS-column     ... FAILED (lsfd/mkfds-unix-dgram-ENDPOINTS-column)


Answer: specific subtest that failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
         lsfd: UNIX dgram sockets                            ... FAILED (1 from 4 sub-tests)


Answer: summary of the group of tests that failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [=================================== FAILURES ===================================
____________________ TestCoreClient_0.test_account_creation ____________________

self = <urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x7f5bda819590>

    def _new_conn(self) -> socket.socket:
        """Establish a socket connection and set nodelay settings on it.
    
        :return: New socket connection.
        """
        try:
>           sock = connection.create_connection(
                (self._dns_host, self.port),
                self.timeout,
                source_address=self.source_address,
                socket_options=self.socket_options,
            )
]: [Seems there is a test failure reported by pytest]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AUaFVJ (%check)

RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AUaFVJ (%check)]: [Due to the test failure the exit code is bad.]


Answer: Issue: Regression introduced as an existing test fails w.r.t account creation.
Resolution: Contributor must tweak code such that account creation is not affected, current code change seems to introduce regression
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
____________________ TestCoreClient_0.test_account_creation ____________________

self = <urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x7f5bda819590>

    def _new_conn(self) -> socket.socket:
        """Establish a socket connection and set nodelay settings on it.
    
        :return: New socket connection.
        """
        try:
>           sock = connection.create_connection(
                (self._dns_host, self.port),
                self.timeout,
                source_address=self.source_address,
                socket_options=self.socket_options,
            )


Answer: Seems there is a test failure reported by pytest
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AUaFVJ (%check)

RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AUaFVJ (%check)

Answer: Due to the test failure the exit code is bad.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Package 'cantera' requires a different Python: 3.14.0 not in '<3.14,>=3.8']: [Python version present on build system does not met package 'cantera' requirements.]


Answer: Issue: Cantera package requirement for python version wasn't satisfied.
Resolution: Provide required version of python on build system (<3.14,>=3.8).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Package 'cantera' requires a different Python: 3.14.0 not in '<3.14,>=3.8'

Answer: Python version present on build system does not met package 'cantera' requirements.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [hex.c:87:35: error: initializer-string for array of 'char' truncates NUL terminator but destination lacks 'nonstring' attribute (17 chars into 16 available) [-Werror=unterminated-string-initialization]
   87 |     static const char   map[16] = "0123456789ABCDEF";
      |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [There is an error because char array is too small to hold include "0123456789ABCDEF" sting with null terminator.]


Answer: Issue: Compiler expect string to be a proper C-string terminated with '\0'
Resolution: Increase size of the string to size 17 (static const char   map[16]) or let compiler to detect the size (static const char map[] = "0123456789ABCDEF")
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
hex.c:87:35: error: initializer-string for array of 'char' truncates NUL terminator but destination lacks 'nonstring' attribute (17 chars into 16 available) [-Werror=unterminated-string-initialization]
   87 |     static const char   map[16] = "0123456789ABCDEF";
      |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: There is an error because char array is too small to hold include "0123456789ABCDEF" sting with null terminator.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [mkfile.c:55:17: error: too many arguments to function ‘putfig’; expected 0, have 9]: [Compiler error about mismatching number of arguments between a function declaration and a function definition.]


Answer: Issue: The function putfig has been declared in the old C-style with empty parameter list, which meant the function is defined later with correct parameters.
Resolution: Patch the sources and rewrite the function declarations so that the function arguments match the function definitions.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
mkfile.c:55:17: error: too many arguments to function ‘putfig’; expected 0, have 9

Answer: Compiler error about mismatching number of arguments between a function declaration and a function definition.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c
patching file src/ALAC/alac_encoder.c
Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 38.
]: [This shows that same patch has been applied twice]


Answer: Issue: Same patch has been applied twice, probably copy paste error.
Resolution: Check if all required patches has been applied once. Either this patch line was doubled or it was supposed to apply different patch
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c
patching file src/ALAC/alac_encoder.c
Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):
+ echo 'Patch #2 (libsndfile-1.2.2-stdbool.patch):'
+ /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -f -p1 -b --suffix .stdbool --fuzz=0
patching file src/ALAC/alac_decoder.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 38.


Answer: This shows that same patch has been applied twice
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/python3 -s /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f /builddir/build/BUILD/tmt-1.50.0.dev19+gd5e53bc4-1.20250602123244466136.pr3709.19.gd5e53bc4.el9.x86_64-pyproject-modules
Check import: tmt
Check import: tmt.base
Check import: tmt.checks
Check import: tmt.checks.avc
Check import: tmt.checks.coredump
Check import: tmt.checks.dmesg
Check import: tmt.checks.watchdog
Check import: tmt.cli
Check import: tmt.cli.about
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 171, in <module>
    main()
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 167, in main
    import_modules(modules)
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 100, in import_modules
    importlib.import_module(module)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/importlib/__init__.py", line 127, in import_module
    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1030, in _gcd_import
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1007, in _find_and_load
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 986, in _find_and_load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 680, in _load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 850, in exec_module
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 228, in _call_with_frames_removed
  File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/tmt-1.50.0.dev19+gd5e53bc4-1.20250602123244466136.pr3709.19.gd5e53bc4.el9.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/tmt/cli/about.py", line 121, in <module>
    def hints(context: Context, hint_ids: Any) -> None:
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/click/decorators.py", line 245, in decorator
    option_attrs["help"] = inspect.cleandoc(option_attrs["help"])
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/inspect.py", line 632, in cleandoc
    lines = doc.expandtabs().split('\n')
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'expandtabs'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Wuz084 (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Wuz084 (%check)]: [The snippet contains rpmbuild's import_all_modules.py step, and the traceback showing its failure.]


Answer: Issue: According to the traceback, the Click library tried to display a help text for a command, including its options. One of the options was defined without a help text; however, Click assumes all options do have help text, and unconditionally treats options `help` property as a string. In this case, that results in a runtime error, spoiling the rpmbuild process.
Resolution: Find the command option that lacks `help` that is defined without a `help` parameter.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/python3 -s /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f /builddir/build/BUILD/tmt-1.50.0.dev19+gd5e53bc4-1.20250602123244466136.pr3709.19.gd5e53bc4.el9.x86_64-pyproject-modules
Check import: tmt
Check import: tmt.base
Check import: tmt.checks
Check import: tmt.checks.avc
Check import: tmt.checks.coredump
Check import: tmt.checks.dmesg
Check import: tmt.checks.watchdog
Check import: tmt.cli
Check import: tmt.cli.about
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 171, in <module>
    main()
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 167, in main
    import_modules(modules)
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 100, in import_modules
    importlib.import_module(module)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/importlib/__init__.py", line 127, in import_module
    return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1030, in _gcd_import
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1007, in _find_and_load
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 986, in _find_and_load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 680, in _load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 850, in exec_module
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 228, in _call_with_frames_removed
  File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/tmt-1.50.0.dev19+gd5e53bc4-1.20250602123244466136.pr3709.19.gd5e53bc4.el9.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/tmt/cli/about.py", line 121, in <module>
    def hints(context: Context, hint_ids: Any) -> None:
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/click/decorators.py", line 245, in decorator
    option_attrs["help"] = inspect.cleandoc(option_attrs["help"])
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/inspect.py", line 632, in cleandoc
    lines = doc.expandtabs().split('\n')
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'expandtabs'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Wuz084 (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Wuz084 (%check)

Answer: The snippet contains rpmbuild's import_all_modules.py step, and the traceback showing its failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED: obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib 
"/usr/bin/python3" "../../build/rust/rustc_wrapper.py" --rustc=../../../../../../usr/bin/rustc --depfile=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.d --rsp=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.rsp -- -Clinker="clang++" --crate-name skrifa ../../third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/vendor/skrifa-0.29.2/src/lib.rs --crate-type rlib --cap-lints=allow --cfg=feature=\"autohint_shaping\" --cfg=feature=\"std\" --cfg=feature=\"traversal\" -Cmetadata=skrifa-0.29 --edition=2021 -Cforce-unwind-tables=no -Crelocation-model=pic -Zsplit-lto-unit -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Cdefault-linker-libraries -Zdep-info-omit-d-target -Zmacro-backtrace -Zremap-cwd-prefix=. -Zexternal-clangrt --color=always --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Ccodegen-units=1 --cfg cr_rustc_revision=\"rustc\ 1.79.0\ \(129f3b996\ 2024-06-10\)\ \(Red\ Hat\ 1.79.0-3.el9_5\)\" -Copt-level=3 -Zallow-features= -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Zsplit-lto-unit -Clinker-plugin-lto=yes -Dunsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn --emit=dep-info=obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib.d,link -o obj/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/libskrifa_lib.rlib LDFLAGS RUSTENV OUT_DIR=../../../../../../out/Release/gen/third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib CARGO_PKG_VERSION=0.29.2 CARGO_PKG_NAME=skrifa CARGO_PKG_DESCRIPTION=Metadata\ reader\ and\ glyph\ scaler\ for\ OpenType\ fonts. CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR=../../third_party/rust/skrifa/v0_29/lib/crate
error[E0599]: no method named `is_none_or` found for enum `Option` in the current scope
  --> ../../third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/vendor/skrifa-0.29.2/src/glyph_name.rs:97:26
   |
97 |         if name.as_ref().is_none_or(|s| s.is_empty()) {
   |                          ^^^^^^^^^^
   |
help: there is a method `is_none` with a similar name, but with different arguments
  --> /builddir/build/BUILD/rustc-1.79.0-src/library/core/src/option.rs:650:5
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0599`.

Answer: The corresponding error messages indicate that the rust compiler breaks with the error:
error[E0599]: no method named `is_none_or` found for enum `Option` in the current scope
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ cd pycairo-1.28.0
+ set -ex
+ CFLAGS='-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64-v2 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection'
+ LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 '
+ /usr/bin/python3.12 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3.12 -sP'
/usr/bin/python3.12: can't open file '/builddir/build/BUILD/pycairo-1.28.0/setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ts6drB (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ts6drB (%build)]: [When "setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory" occurs it usually means that the package switched to a compliant PEP-517 build system, moving from setup.py to pyproject.toml.]


Answer: Issue: The setup.py file does not exist anymore in the package, the macros need to be updated to build projects with pyproject.toml.
Resolution: To fix the issue the specfile needs to be updated to use new macros.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_build_macros is a good start to understand the change. 

For more details look at https://peps.python.org/pep-0518/ and https://peps.python.org/pep-0517/
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ cd pycairo-1.28.0
+ set -ex
+ CFLAGS='-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64-v2 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection'
+ LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 '
+ /usr/bin/python3.12 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3.12 -sP'
/usr/bin/python3.12: can't open file '/builddir/build/BUILD/pycairo-1.28.0/setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ts6drB (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ts6drB (%build)

Answer: When "setup.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory" occurs it usually means that the package switched to a compliant PEP-517 build system, moving from setup.py to pyproject.toml.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/ghostscript-10.02.1-txtwrite-device-needs-to-countdown-the-device-on-tex.patch
+ /usr/bin/git apply --index --reject -p1 ]: [It indicates the patch which being applied.]
=============
[error: patch failed: devices/vector/gdevtxtw.c:2059
Applying patch devices/vector/gdevtxtw.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1]: [It shows that patch application failed.]


Answer: Issue: Patch application failed because (in this case) the patch had been upstreamed.
Resolution: Check that the patch has been upstreamed.
If yes: Remove the patch line from spec and the patch from dist-git.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/ghostscript-10.02.1-txtwrite-device-needs-to-countdown-the-device-on-tex.patch
+ /usr/bin/git apply --index --reject -p1 

Answer: It indicates the patch which being applied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: patch failed: devices/vector/gdevtxtw.c:2059
Applying patch devices/vector/gdevtxtw.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1

Answer: It shows that patch application failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tkinter']: [This error indicates that required module `tkinter`, imported in `ttkbootstrap/style.py` was not present in the environment at runtime. ]


Answer: Issue: One of the modules required was not present during execution of the `check` step. This caused the build.
Resolution: Ensure that package providing `tkinter` must be installed during execution of the `check` step.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tkinter'

Answer: This error indicates that required module `tkinter`, imported in `ttkbootstrap/style.py` was not present in the environment at runtime.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CC=clang]: [clang is being used as the C compiler.]
=============
[CXX=clang++]: [clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler]
=============
[gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ]: [This is the error message from the build failure.]


Answer: Issue: The rpm set clang as the C compiler, but the build system hard-coded gcc as the compiler, so it fails because it is trying to use a command line argument that is meant for clang.
Resolution: Fix the package's build system so that it respects the CC environment variable and doesn't hard-code gcc.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CXX=clang++

Answer: clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler