fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [Some packages were not found in the repository which were required in the spec file.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'python3dist(setuptools) >= 64'
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(setuptools-scm) >= 7']: [The packages that can't be found in the official repo are python3dist(setuptools) >= 64 and python3dist(setuptools-scm) >= 7.]


Answer: Issue: Packages python3dist(setuptools-scm) >= 7 and python3dist(setuptools) >= 64 are not in the official repository for this chroot.
Resolution: Lower the requirements to match the repo requirements.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: Some packages were not found in the repository which were required in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(setuptools) >= 64'
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(setuptools-scm) >= 7'

Answer: The packages that can't be found in the official repo are python3dist(setuptools) >= 64 and python3dist(setuptools-scm) >= 7.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [staging/automops.c:74:19: error: conflicting types for ‘automops_alloc_protocol’; have ‘struct automops *(struct automops *)’
   74 | struct automops * automops_alloc_protocol(struct automops *cur)
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from staging/automops.c:20:
staging/mops.h:943:19: note: previous declaration of ‘automops_alloc_protocol’ with type ‘struct automops *(void)’
  943 | struct automops * automops_alloc_protocol();
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/automops.c:121:19: error: conflicting types for ‘automops_delete_protocol’; have ‘struct automops *(struct automops *)’
  121 | struct automops * automops_delete_protocol(struct automops *cur)
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/mops.h:944:19: note: previous declaration of ‘automops_delete_protocol’ with type ‘struct automops *(void)’
  944 | struct automops * automops_delete_protocol();
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/automops.c:161:19: error: conflicting types for ‘automops_search_protocol’; have ‘struct automops *(struct automops *, char *)’
  161 | struct automops * automops_search_protocol(struct automops *list, char *name)
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/mops.h:945:19: note: previous declaration of ‘automops_search_protocol’ with type ‘struct automops *(void)’
  945 | struct automops * automops_search_protocol();
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/automops.c: In function ‘automops_dump_all’:
staging/automops.c:243:52: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘valname’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
  243 |                                         (f->valname!=NULL) ? f->valname : "(no value name)" ,
      |                                                    ^~
staging/mops.h:177:14: note: ‘valname’ declared here
  177 |         char valname[AUTOMOPS_MAX_NAME_LEN+1];
      |              ^~~~~~~
]: [This is relevant error message saying that the compilation fails due to conflicting data types.]


Answer: Issue: It failed due to switch to C23 standard which is more strict.
Resolution: Either fix the sources or recompile with the -std=gnu17 GCC flag.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
staging/automops.c:74:19: error: conflicting types for ‘automops_alloc_protocol’; have ‘struct automops *(struct automops *)’
   74 | struct automops * automops_alloc_protocol(struct automops *cur)
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from staging/automops.c:20:
staging/mops.h:943:19: note: previous declaration of ‘automops_alloc_protocol’ with type ‘struct automops *(void)’
  943 | struct automops * automops_alloc_protocol();
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/automops.c:121:19: error: conflicting types for ‘automops_delete_protocol’; have ‘struct automops *(struct automops *)’
  121 | struct automops * automops_delete_protocol(struct automops *cur)
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/mops.h:944:19: note: previous declaration of ‘automops_delete_protocol’ with type ‘struct automops *(void)’
  944 | struct automops * automops_delete_protocol();
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/automops.c:161:19: error: conflicting types for ‘automops_search_protocol’; have ‘struct automops *(struct automops *, char *)’
  161 | struct automops * automops_search_protocol(struct automops *list, char *name)
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/mops.h:945:19: note: previous declaration of ‘automops_search_protocol’ with type ‘struct automops *(void)’
  945 | struct automops * automops_search_protocol();
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
staging/automops.c: In function ‘automops_dump_all’:
staging/automops.c:243:52: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘valname’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
  243 |                                         (f->valname!=NULL) ? f->valname : "(no value name)" ,
      |                                                    ^~
staging/mops.h:177:14: note: ‘valname’ declared here
  177 |         char valname[AUTOMOPS_MAX_NAME_LEN+1];
      |              ^~~~~~~


Answer: This is relevant error message saying that the compilation fails due to conflicting data types.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_ test_naked_invocation[args3-usage:\n    http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...]\n\nerror:\n    argument --pretty: invalid choice: '$invalid' (choose from 'all', 'colors', 'format', 'none')\n\nfor more information:\n    run 'http --help' or visit https://httpie.io/docs/cli\n\n] _
ignore_terminal_size = None, args = ['--pretty', '$invalid']
expected_msg = "usage:\n    http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...]\n\nerror:\n    argument --prett...', 'colors', 'format', 'none')\n\nfor more information:\n    run 'http --help' or visit https://httpie.io/docs/cli\n\n"
    @pytest.mark.parametrize(
        'args, expected_msg', [
            ([], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE),
            (['--pretty'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_NO_ARG),
            (['pie.dev', '--pretty'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_NO_ARG),
            (['--pretty', '$invalid'], NAKED_HELP_MESSAGE_PRETTY_WITH_INVALID_ARG),
        ]
    )
    def test_naked_invocation(ignore_terminal_size, args, expected_msg):
        result = http(*args, tolerate_error_exit_status=True)
>       assert result.stderr == expected_msg
E       AssertionError: assert 'usage:\n    .../docs/cli\n\n' == 'usage:\n    .../docs/cli\n\n'
E         
E           usage:
E               http --pretty {all, colors, format, none} [METHOD] URL [REQUEST_ITEM ...]
E           
E           error:
E         -     argument --pretty: invalid choice: '$invalid' (choose from 'all', 'colors', 'format', 'none')
E         ?                                                                -   -  -      -  -      -  -    -...
E         
E         ...Full output truncated (5 lines hidden), use '-vv' to show
tests/test_cli_ui.py:65: AssertionError
----------------------------- Captured stderr call -----------------------------


Answer: The test suite failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
_______________________ test_plugins_installation[True] ________________________
httpie_plugins_success = <function httpie_plugins_success.<locals>.runner at 0x3ff9fdd7920>
interface = Interface(path=PosixPath('/tmp/pytest-of-mockbuild/pytest-0/test_plugins_installation_True0/interface'), environment=<...dout': <tempfile._TemporaryFileWrapper object at 0x3ff9fdd7890>,
 'stdout_encoding': 'utf-8',
 'stdout_isatty': True}>)
dummy_plugin = Plugin(interface=Interface(path=PosixPath('/tmp/pytest-of-mockbuild/pytest-0/test_plugins_installation_True0/interface...ue}>), name='httpie-0a89011a', version='1.0.0', entry_points=[EntryPoint(name='test', group='httpie.plugins.auth.v1')])
cli_mode = True
    @pytest.mark.requires_installation
    @pytest.mark.parametrize('cli_mode', [True, False])
    def test_plugins_installation(httpie_plugins_success, interface, dummy_plugin, cli_mode):
>       lines = httpie_plugins_success('install', dummy_plugin.path, cli_mode=cli_mode)
tests/test_plugins_cli.py:10: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 


Answer: Installation of dummy plugin failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.afkYZL (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.afkYZL (%check)
Child return code was: 1


Answer: The build failed in %check phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1167219 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
:: [ 22:04:34 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command './Install < /dev/null' (Expected 0, got 1)
]: [Record of underlying bcc crash]


Answer: Issue: The underlying bcc layer has crashed.
Resolution: This is a known issue for older llvm. If it reoccures, please report it to the bcc (kernel) team. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-66060 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-70250 for more information.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/pcp/lib/pmdaproc.sh: line 856: 1167219 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) PCP_PYTHON_DOMAIN=1 /usr/bin/python3 /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
Arrgh! failed to create /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/domain.h.python from /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/bcc/pmdabcc.python
:: [ 22:04:34 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command './Install < /dev/null' (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Record of underlying bcc crash
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [grep: ./configure: No such file or directory
+ ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/bin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZDGQGl: line 81: ./configure: No such file or directory]: [missing configure script]


Answer: Issue: it could not find configure script, the project does not use Autotools, but Meson build system
Resolution: replace ./configure with %meson
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
grep: ./configure: No such file or directory
+ ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/bin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZDGQGl: line 81: ./configure: No such file or directory

Answer: missing configure script
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.4-11.4.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/man/man1/mysql_ldb.1*': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.4-11.4.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/man/man1/mariadb-ldb.1*': No such file or directory]: ['rm' command failed. File do not exist.

This can happen e.g. after package rebase, when the content of the sources changes.

Usually happens in %prep or %install sections]


Answer: Issue: 'rm' command failed. File do not exist.
Resolution: Check the SPECfile. Find the specific 'rm' command.

Find out why the file is missing.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.4-11.4.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/man/man1/mysql_ldb.1*': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.4-11.4.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/man/man1/mariadb-ldb.1*': No such file or directory

Answer: 'rm' command failed. File do not exist.

This can happen e.g. after package rebase, when the content of the sources changes.

Usually happens in %prep or %install sections
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [warning: Unsupported auto-load script at offset 0 in section .debug_gdb_scripts
of file /builddir/build/BUILD/cri-o-1.33.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/crio.
Use `info auto-load python-scripts [REGEXP]' to list them.]: [Seems to be warning about using an unsupported script, this may not be important but can be noted]
=============
[[2025-05-09 07:57:20,638][  INFO][PID:1195855] Finished build: id=9013973 failed=False timeout=18000 destdir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/packit/cri-o-cri-o-9190 chroot=fedora-42-x86_64 ]: [This one seems important, the failure seems to be due to timeout]


Answer: Issue: The build seems to be running without issues, the dependencies install fine, but there is probably a server/backend timeout.
Resolution: Either optimise resources to execute the build faster or incease time-out on server/backend.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
warning: Unsupported auto-load script at offset 0 in section .debug_gdb_scripts
of file /builddir/build/BUILD/cri-o-1.33.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/crio.
Use `info auto-load python-scripts [REGEXP]' to list them.

Answer: Seems to be warning about using an unsupported script, this may not be important but can be noted
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[2025-05-09 07:57:20,638][  INFO][PID:1195855] Finished build: id=9013973 failed=False timeout=18000 destdir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/packit/cri-o-cri-o-9190 chroot=fedora-42-x86_64 

Answer: This one seems important, the failure seems to be due to timeout
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
]: [RPM installation of build dependencies failed.]
=============
[No match for argument: checkpolicy >= 3.8
]: [The checkpolicy package with version 3.8 or higher is not available in available the repositories.]
=============
[No match for argument: policycoreutils-devel >= 3.8
]: [The policycoreutils-devel package with version 3.8 or higher is not available in available the repositories.]


Answer: Issue: RPM build dependencies can't be satisfied. Packages checkpolicy and policycoreutils-devel in version 3.8 or higher are not available.
Resolution: Please make sure your dependencies are correct in spec file or make sure that the dependencies are build first and included in the build repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:


Answer: RPM installation of build dependencies failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: checkpolicy >= 3.8


Answer: The checkpolicy package with version 3.8 or higher is not available in available the repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: policycoreutils-devel >= 3.8


Answer: The policycoreutils-devel package with version 3.8 or higher is not available in available the repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [cp: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/fedora-messaging-3.7.1-build/fedora_messaging-3.7.1/LICENSE': No such file or directory]: [Error message]
=============
[error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/fedora-messaging-3.7.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/licenses/fedora-messaging/LICENSE]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: The file LICENSE was not found in the tarball
Resolution: Check if the file was renamed or removed, and adjust the spec file accordingly.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
cp: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILD/fedora-messaging-3.7.1-build/fedora_messaging-3.7.1/LICENSE': No such file or directory

Answer: Error message
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/fedora-messaging-3.7.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/licenses/fedora-messaging/LICENSE

Answer: Error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: python3dist(bitsandbytes) >= 0.39
No match for argument: python3dist(diffusers) = 0.29
No match for argument: python3dist(galore-torch)]: [Requested packages, python3dist(bitsandbytes), python3dist(diffusers), python3dist(galore-torch)
 are unavailable. Or at least the version constraints on them can not be satisfied.]
=============
[No match for argument: python3dist(ray)
No match for argument: python3dist(rpyc) = 6
No match for argument: python3dist(safetensors)]: [Requested packages, python3dist(ray), python3dist(rpyc), python3dist(safetensors)
 are unavailable. Or at least the version constraints on them can not be satisfied.]
=============
[No match for argument: python3dist(transformers) = 4.39.3
No match for argument: python3dist(uvicorn) = 0.29]: [Requested packages, python3dist(transformers), python3dist(uvicorn),
 are unavailable. Or at least the version constraints on them can not be satisfied.]
=============
[ Problem 3: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-contexttimer-0.3.3-1.fc37.noarch
 Problem 4: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-google-3.0.0-1.fc37.noarch]: [Multiple conflicts were detected between requested versions of dependencies. ]


Answer: Issue: Multiple dependencies were not available. There are also multiple conflicting dependencies.
Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies required by the build are available at build time, and compatible with one another.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(bitsandbytes) >= 0.39
No match for argument: python3dist(diffusers) = 0.29
No match for argument: python3dist(galore-torch)

Answer: Requested packages, python3dist(bitsandbytes), python3dist(diffusers), python3dist(galore-torch)
 are unavailable. Or at least the version constraints on them can not be satisfied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(ray)
No match for argument: python3dist(rpyc) = 6
No match for argument: python3dist(safetensors)

Answer: Requested packages, python3dist(ray), python3dist(rpyc), python3dist(safetensors)
 are unavailable. Or at least the version constraints on them can not be satisfied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3dist(transformers) = 4.39.3
No match for argument: python3dist(uvicorn) = 0.29

Answer: Requested packages, python3dist(transformers), python3dist(uvicorn),
 are unavailable. Or at least the version constraints on them can not be satisfied.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 Problem 3: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-contexttimer-0.3.3-1.fc37.noarch
 Problem 4: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-google-3.0.0-1.fc37.noarch

Answer: Multiple conflicts were detected between requested versions of dependencies.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: failed to download `addr2line v0.21.0`

Caused by:
  attempting to make an HTTP request, but --offline was specified
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPmFrb (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPmFrb (%build)]: [error: failed to download `addr2line v0.21.0`

Caused by:
  attempting to make an HTTP request, but --offline was specified
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPmFrb (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPmFrb (%build)

RPM build errors:
Finish: rpmbuild netavark-1.10.1-1.20240319111514259507.pr917.48.g57576e4.fc38.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for netavark-1.10.1-1.20240319111514259507.pr917.48.g57576e4.fc38.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-38-aarch64-1710847322.119945/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-38-aarch64-1710847322.119945/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-38-aarch64-1710847322.119945/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/netavark-1.10.1-1.20240319111514259507.pr917.48.g57576e4.fc38.src.rpm) Config(fedora-38-aarch64) 8 minutes 13 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 041423257c0f4e6db6bfaab070de1c31 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-38-aarch64-1710847322.119945/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.0z9xtamq:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target aarch64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/netavark.spec'
]


Answer: Issue: can't fetch addr2line, don't know why yet.
Resolution: No idea yet
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: failed to download `addr2line v0.21.0`

Caused by:
  attempting to make an HTTP request, but --offline was specified
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPmFrb (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPmFrb (%build)

Answer: error: failed to download `addr2line v0.21.0`

Caused by:
  attempting to make an HTTP request, but --offline was specified
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPmFrb (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPmFrb (%build)

RPM build errors:
Finish: rpmbuild netavark-1.10.1-1.20240319111514259507.pr917.48.g57576e4.fc38.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for netavark-1.10.1-1.20240319111514259507.pr917.48.g57576e4.fc38.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 3 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-38-aarch64-1710847322.119945/root/var/log/dnf.rpm.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-38-aarch64-1710847322.119945/root/var/log/dnf.librepo.log
/var/lib/mock/fedora-38-aarch64-1710847322.119945/root/var/log/dnf.log
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/netavark-1.10.1-1.20240319111514259507.pr917.48.g57576e4.fc38.src.rpm) Config(fedora-38-aarch64) 8 minutes 13 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 041423257c0f4e6db6bfaab070de1c31 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-38-aarch64-1710847322.119945/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.0z9xtamq:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target aarch64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/netavark.spec'
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/logcheck
   /usr/sbin/logtail
   /usr/sbin/logtail2
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/logcheck-test
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/logcheck
   /usr/sbin/logtail
   /usr/sbin/logtail2]: [There are extra files in build root.]


Answer: Issue: Files that are not listed in %files section are present in build root.
Resolution: Verify that files are expected to be in rpm and add them to %files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/logcheck
   /usr/sbin/logtail
   /usr/sbin/logtail2
    File listed twice: /usr/bin/logcheck-test
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/sbin/logcheck
   /usr/sbin/logtail
   /usr/sbin/logtail2

Answer: There are extra files in build root.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py test
usage: setup.py [global_opts] cmd1 [cmd1_opts] [cmd2 [cmd2_opts] ...]
   or: setup.py --help [cmd1 cmd2 ...]
   or: setup.py --help-commands
   or: setup.py cmd --help
error: invalid command 'test'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ff1bZV (%check)]: [This snippet shows why the build has failed.]


Answer: Issue: In %check section, the build tries to use `setup.py tests`, which fails as the command `test` is invalid.
Resolution: Modify the spec file so the appropriate test runner is used.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py test
usage: setup.py [global_opts] cmd1 [cmd1_opts] [cmd2 [cmd2_opts] ...]
   or: setup.py --help [cmd1 cmd2 ...]
   or: setup.py --help-commands
   or: setup.py cmd --help
error: invalid command 'test'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ff1bZV (%check)

Answer: This snippet shows why the build has failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_point]: [Unable to import undefined symbol "g_once_init_enter_pointer"]
=============
[ File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line 14, in <module>
    from . import conf
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 10, in <module>
    from . import _co]: [The file "conf.py" might have an incorrect import ]


Answer: Issue: Due to the symbol "g_once_init_enter_pointer" not being defined
Resolution: Check the file "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py" on line 10, and try to find why the import fails
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_point

Answer: Unable to import undefined symbol "g_once_init_enter_pointer"
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line 14, in <module>
    from . import conf
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 10, in <module>
    from . import _co

Answer: The file "conf.py" might have an incorrect import
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/nodejs-sources.sh: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/node-v22.14.0-stripped.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/0002-Fix-Missing-OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE-Guard.patch: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/0001-Remove-unused-OpenSSL-config.patch: No such file or directory]: [List of missing files]


Answer: Issue: The package wanted to use the following files:

- nodejs-sources.sh
- node-v22.14.0-stripped.tar.gz
- 0002-Fix-Missing-OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE-Guard.patch
- 0001-Remove-unused-OpenSSL-config.patch

But none of them could be found.
Resolution: Either add the files or make sure the package doesn't use them.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/nodejs-sources.sh: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/node-v22.14.0-stripped.tar.gz: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/0002-Fix-Missing-OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE-Guard.patch: No such file or directory
error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/0001-Remove-unused-OpenSSL-config.patch: No such file or directory

Answer: List of missing files
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAILED tests/unit/test_bidi.py::TestBackgroundConsumer::test_consumer_expected_error
FAILED tests/unit/test_bidi.py::TestBackgroundConsumer::test_consumer_unexpected_error]: [failed test]


Answer: Issue: Build failed because of failed testsuite
Resolution: Fix the code or update the test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED tests/unit/test_bidi.py::TestBackgroundConsumer::test_consumer_expected_error
FAILED tests/unit/test_bidi.py::TestBackgroundConsumer::test_consumer_unexpected_error

Answer: failed test
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [wildtest.c:35:14: error: ‘bool’ cannot be defined via ‘typedef’
   35 | typedef char bool;
      |              ^~~~
wildtest.c:35:14: note: ‘bool’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
wildtest.c:35:1: warning: useless type name in empty declaration
   35 | typedef char bool;
      | ^~~~~~~
make: *** [Makefile:70: wildtest.o] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.KXBDBd (%check)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.KXBDBd (%check)]: [The snippet shows a fail in the build with the new GCC15 and C23]


Answer: Issue: 'bool' is now a keyword so it can't be used as a new name for char.
Resolution: I solved this one by querying the STDC version:
+#if !defined(__STDC_VERSION__) || __STDC_VERSION__ < 202311L
 typedef char bool;
+#endif
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
wildtest.c:35:14: error: ‘bool’ cannot be defined via ‘typedef’
   35 | typedef char bool;
      |              ^~~~
wildtest.c:35:14: note: ‘bool’ is a keyword with ‘-std=c23’ onwards
wildtest.c:35:1: warning: useless type name in empty declaration
   35 | typedef char bool;
      | ^~~~~~~
make: *** [Makefile:70: wildtest.o] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.KXBDBd (%check)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.KXBDBd (%check)

Answer: The snippet shows a fail in the build with the new GCC15 and C23
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -o lex.yy.o -c lex.yy.c
policy_scan.l: In function âyyerrorâ:
policy_scan.l:326:13: error: implicit declaration of function âisprintâ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  326 |         if (isprint((unsigned char)yytext[0])) {
      |             ^~~~~~~
policy_scan.l:35:1: note: include â&lt;ctype.h&gt;â or provide a declaration of âisprintâ
   34 | #include "y.tab.h"
  +++ |+#include &lt;ctype.h&gt;
   35 | #endif
make: *** [Makefile:45: lex.yy.o] Error 1]: [This is the actual build error reported by gcc. ]


Answer: Issue: There's an implicit function declaration - a function is used before being declared.
Resolution: Include the necessary header for isprint(3) to avoid an implicit
function declaration.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -o lex.yy.o -c lex.yy.c
policy_scan.l: In function âyyerrorâ:
policy_scan.l:326:13: error: implicit declaration of function âisprintâ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  326 |         if (isprint((unsigned char)yytext[0])) {
      |             ^~~~~~~
policy_scan.l:35:1: note: include â&lt;ctype.h&gt;â or provide a declaration of âisprintâ
   34 | #include "y.tab.h"
  +++ |+#include &lt;ctype.h&gt;
   35 | #endif
make: *** [Makefile:45: lex.yy.o] Error 1

Answer: This is the actual build error reported by gcc.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  1) ABRT #handle_exception logs error into syslog when can't communicate with ABRT daemon because no-one is listeing on the other side
     Failure/Error: expect(syslog).to receive(:err).with("%s", /can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it running\? Connection refused -( connect\(2\) for)? "?#{socket_path}"?/)
       #<Double "syslog"> received :err with unexpected arguments
         expected: ("%s", /can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it running\? Connection refused -( connect\(2\) for)? "?\/bui...ygem-abrt-0.4.0-build\/abrt-0.4.0\/usr\/share\/gems\/gems\/abrt-0.4.0\/spec\/abrt_handler_spec.rb"?/)
              got: ("%s", "can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it running? too long unix socket path (114bytes given but 108bytes max)")
       Diff:
       @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
        ["%s",
       - /can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it running\? Connection refused -( connect\(2\) for)? "?\/builddir\/build\/BUILD\/rubygem-abrt-0.4.0-build\/abrt-0.4.0\/usr\/share\/gems\/gems\/abrt-0.4.0\/spec\/abrt_handler_spec.rb"?/]
       + "can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it running? too long unix socket path (114bytes given but 108bytes max)"]
     # ./spec/abrt_handler_spec.rb:140:in 'block (5 levels) in <top (required)>'


Answer: Test suite error. The interesting bit is the `too long unix socket path (114bytes given but 108bytes max)` part, which suggests that the paths has bigger nesting then expected. This was actually triggered by changes in RPM build directory structure.