fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/share/gems/gems/sprockets-4.2.0/lib/sprockets/uri_utils.rb:66: warning: URI::RFC3986_PARSER.escape is obsolete. Use URI::RFC2396_PARSER.escape explicitly.]: [This is just warning caused by change in Ruby 3.4: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19266]
=============
[Error:
ActionText::JobRenderTest#test_uses_app_default_url_options:
ActionView::Template::Error: Can't resolve image into URL: undefined method 'to_model' for an instance of ActiveStorage::VariantWithRecord
    app/jobs/broadcast_job.rb:5:in 'BroadcastJob#perform'

bin/test /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-actiontext-8.0.1-build/actiontext-8.0.1/usr/share/gems/gems/actiontext-8.0.1/test/integration/job_render_test.rb:8]: [This is the actual test suite error executes in `%check` section]


Answer: Issue: Test suite error, likely due to unstable test, which fails depending on test execution order
Resolution: Re-run the build should workaround the issue. But this would deserve additional analysis and upstream bug report.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/gems/gems/sprockets-4.2.0/lib/sprockets/uri_utils.rb:66: warning: URI::RFC3986_PARSER.escape is obsolete. Use URI::RFC2396_PARSER.escape explicitly.

Answer: This is just warning caused by change in Ruby 3.4: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19266
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error:
ActionText::JobRenderTest#test_uses_app_default_url_options:
ActionView::Template::Error: Can't resolve image into URL: undefined method 'to_model' for an instance of ActiveStorage::VariantWithRecord
    app/jobs/broadcast_job.rb:5:in 'BroadcastJob#perform'

bin/test /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-actiontext-8.0.1-build/actiontext-8.0.1/usr/share/gems/gems/actiontext-8.0.1/test/integration/job_render_test.rb:8

Answer: This is the actual test suite error executes in `%check` section
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ !! Copr timeout => sending INT]: [Copr build timeouted, and the build interrupted by SIGINT.]
=============
[ 'timeout': 18000,]: [The build timeout is set to 18000 secons.]


Answer: Issue: The build was still running when the timeout left, so the build has been terminated.
Resolution: Prolong the timeout to a reasonable value, or request powerful builders https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation/powerful_builders.html so the build can finish faster.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 !! Copr timeout => sending INT

Answer: Copr build timeouted, and the build interrupted by SIGINT.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 'timeout': 18000,

Answer: The build timeout is set to 18000 secons.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [tests/meson.build:22:6: ERROR: Command `/builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-bluetooth-47.1-build/gnome-bluetooth-47.1/tests/unittest_inspector.py /builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-bluetooth-47.1-build/gnome-bluetooth-47.1/tests/integration-test.py` failed with status 1.
A full log can be found at /builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-bluetooth-47.1-build/gnome-bluetooth-47.1/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VG0Hr1 (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VG0Hr1 (%build)
]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: Integration test failed
Resolution: Check why the test failed. Detailed log is in meson-log.txt
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tests/meson.build:22:6: ERROR: Command `/builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-bluetooth-47.1-build/gnome-bluetooth-47.1/tests/unittest_inspector.py /builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-bluetooth-47.1-build/gnome-bluetooth-47.1/tests/integration-test.py` failed with status 1.
A full log can be found at /builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-bluetooth-47.1-build/gnome-bluetooth-47.1/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VG0Hr1 (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VG0Hr1 (%build)


Answer: Error message
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [1712/1712 systemd:libsystemd / test-sd-device                               TIMEOUT         181.31s   killed by signal 15 SIGTERM]: [test-sd-device failed with timeout]
=============
[stderr:
/* test_devname_from_devnum */
/* test_sd_device_new_from_path */
/* test_sd_device_new_from_nulstr */
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-partuuid/1290d63a-42cc-4c71-b87c-xxxxxxxxxxxx
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:0f.0-scsi-0:0:0:0-part3
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-label/Arch\x20Linux
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-uuid/a07b87e5-4af5-4a59-bde9-yyyyyyyyyyyy
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Arch\x20Linux
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-partuuid/1290d63a-42cc-4c71-b87c-xxxxxxxxxxxx
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:0f.0-scsi-0:0:0:0-part3
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-label/Arch\x20Linux
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-uuid/a07b87e5-4af5-4a59-bde9-yyyyyyyyyyyy
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Arch\x20Linux
/* test_sd_device_get_child */]: [More datails about build failure]


Answer: Issue: Build failed during the test phase with a test timeout.
Resolution: There might be a problem with the test or with the code.

Try to increase the test debug logging or timeout.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1712/1712 systemd:libsystemd / test-sd-device                               TIMEOUT         181.31s   killed by signal 15 SIGTERM

Answer: test-sd-device failed with timeout
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
stderr:
/* test_devname_from_devnum */
/* test_sd_device_new_from_path */
/* test_sd_device_new_from_nulstr */
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-partuuid/1290d63a-42cc-4c71-b87c-xxxxxxxxxxxx
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:0f.0-scsi-0:0:0:0-part3
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-label/Arch\x20Linux
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-uuid/a07b87e5-4af5-4a59-bde9-yyyyyyyyyyyy
lo: setting devlink: /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Arch\x20Linux
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-partuuid/1290d63a-42cc-4c71-b87c-xxxxxxxxxxxx
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:0f.0-scsi-0:0:0:0-part3
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-label/Arch\x20Linux
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-uuid/a07b87e5-4af5-4a59-bde9-yyyyyyyyyyyy
lo: checking devlink: /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Arch\x20Linux
/* test_sd_device_get_child */

Answer: More datails about build failure
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:95931946: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; newline inserted
{standard input}:95931947: Warning: zero assumed for missing expression
g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus
compilation terminated.

Answer: This part of the log shows why the build has failed. Note that the error has happened on line number 95931946, which is a lot of lines.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: lc3 >= 1.1.0 not found using pkg-config]: [The relevant error message from pkg-config saying that the 'lc3' package was not found for a required version greater than or equal to 1.1.0.]
=============
[Package 'lc3' has version '1.0.4', required version is '>= 1.1.0']: [Related message providing context of a currently available 'lc3' package version of 1.0.4.]


Answer: Issue: Unsatisfied dependencies - an older version of the 'lc3' package was installed. As a consequence, the 
Resolution: Build a new version of the 'lc3' package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: lc3 >= 1.1.0 not found using pkg-config

Answer: The relevant error message from pkg-config saying that the 'lc3' package was not found for a required version greater than or equal to 1.1.0.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Package 'lc3' has version '1.0.4', required version is '>= 1.1.0'

Answer: Related message providing context of a currently available 'lc3' package version of 1.0.4.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [The following tests FAILED:
	 24 - ansi-c-gcc-CORE (Failed)                          CBMC CORE
	 27 - goto-instrument-CORE (Failed)                     CBMC CORE
	157 - contracts-CORE (Failed)                           CBMC CORE
	161 - contracts-dfcc-CORE (Failed)                      CBMC CORE
	165 - contracts-non-dfcc-CORE (Failed)                  CBMC CORE
	166 - goto-synthesizer-CORE (Failed)                    CBMC CORE
	178 - goto-harness-CORE (Failed)                        CBMC CORE
	182 - goto-harness-multi-file-project-CORE (Failed)     CBMC CORE
RPM build errors:
Errors while running CTest]: [List of failed CTest test cases.]


Answer: Issue: A couple of test cases failed.
Resolution: Analyze the test logs and/or contact the upstream for help with fixing these test failures.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
The following tests FAILED:
	 24 - ansi-c-gcc-CORE (Failed)                          CBMC CORE
	 27 - goto-instrument-CORE (Failed)                     CBMC CORE
	157 - contracts-CORE (Failed)                           CBMC CORE
	161 - contracts-dfcc-CORE (Failed)                      CBMC CORE
	165 - contracts-non-dfcc-CORE (Failed)                  CBMC CORE
	166 - goto-synthesizer-CORE (Failed)                    CBMC CORE
	178 - goto-harness-CORE (Failed)                        CBMC CORE
	182 - goto-harness-multi-file-project-CORE (Failed)     CBMC CORE
RPM build errors:
Errors while running CTest

Answer: List of failed CTest test cases.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [In file included from http.c:5:
git-curl-compat.h:3:10: fatal error: curl/curl.h: No such file or directory
    3 | #include &lt;curl/curl.h&gt;
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.]: [This snippet shows the exact reason why the build has failed.]


Answer: Issue: The build has failed because of missing build require that provides curl.h library.
Resolution: Add the libcurl-devel package, which provides curl.h library.
You can achieve this by adding this line into your spec file:
`BuildRequires:  libcurl-devel`
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
In file included from http.c:5:
git-curl-compat.h:3:10: fatal error: curl/curl.h: No such file or directory
    3 | #include &lt;curl/curl.h&gt;
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.

Answer: This snippet shows the exact reason why the build has failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [cd: git-xcleaner-3.0: No such file or directory]: [This shows that an expected directory wasn't found when the source archive was extracted]


Answer: Issue: The source archive didn't contain the expected top-level directory.
Resolution: Verify the contents of the source archive. Maybe the archive includes a different program version than expected. Maybe it wasn't created correctly. Or perhaps the spec file specifies a hardcoded directory name which doesn't match the actual archive contents.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
cd: git-xcleaner-3.0: No such file or directory

Answer: This shows that an expected directory wasn't found when the source archive was extracted
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ tar -xf /builddir/build/SOURCES/client-knative-v1.17.0-vendored-deps.tar.zst --strip-components=1
tar: This does not look like a tar archive
tar: Skipping to next header
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors]: [This is the command the build errors on in %prep.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to `tar` in RHEL 8 not supporting automatic zstd detection.
Resolution: When building on RHEL 8, use either the `-I` or `--use-compress-program` flag to instruct `tar` to use `zstd` to handle compression and decompression.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ tar -xf /builddir/build/SOURCES/client-knative-v1.17.0-vendored-deps.tar.zst --strip-components=1
tar: This does not look like a tar archive
tar: Skipping to next header
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors

Answer: This is the command the build errors on in %prep.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Curl error (6): Could not resolve hostname for ]: [Curl failure to query repository metadata]


Answer: Issue: dnf builddep failed due to networking issue
Resolution: re-start build to choose different builder
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Curl error (6): Could not resolve hostname for 

Answer: Curl failure to query repository metadata
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Package "python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc40.noarch" is already installed.
Problem: package python3-pip-23.3.1-2.fc40.noarch conflicts with python-pip < 23.3.1-2.fc40 provided by python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc40.noarch
  - cannot install both python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc40.noarch and python3-pip-23.3.1-2.fc40.noarch
  - cannot install the best candidate for the j]: [It describes the conflicting versions of package needed. The being-built python-pipdeptree requires python3-pip-23.3.1-2.fc40.noarch but in the repository there is available a lower version, python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc40.noarch]
=============
[
Requirement satisfied: pip >= 19
   (installed: pip 23.2.]: [This part says which version of python3-pip has been installed into the buildroot. ]
=============
[ python3-pip               noarch 23.2.1-1.fc40     copr_base   14.0 M]: [It says which python3-pip has been installed: version 23.2.1-1.fc40 which has been built in the given copr repository]
=============
[
Handling pip>=23.3.1; extra == 'test' from built wheel metadata: Requires-Dist (pipdeptre]: [It contains the requirements read from the built wheel metadata, including the version constraint - pip's version has to be greater or equal 23.3.1]


Answer: Issue: There is a dependency version conflict that is impossible to resolve. python3-pip version (equal or greater than 23.3.1), required by python-pipdeptree, is not available in the copr repository.
Resolution: Build the required version of python3-pip in the same copr. Then retrigger a new build of python-pipdeptree.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Package "python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc40.noarch" is already installed.
Problem: package python3-pip-23.3.1-2.fc40.noarch conflicts with python-pip < 23.3.1-2.fc40 provided by python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc40.noarch
  - cannot install both python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc40.noarch and python3-pip-23.3.1-2.fc40.noarch
  - cannot install the best candidate for the j

Answer: It describes the conflicting versions of package needed. The being-built python-pipdeptree requires python3-pip-23.3.1-2.fc40.noarch but in the repository there is available a lower version, python3-pip-23.2.1-1.fc40.noarch
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Requirement satisfied: pip >= 19
   (installed: pip 23.2.

Answer: This part says which version of python3-pip has been installed into the buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 python3-pip               noarch 23.2.1-1.fc40     copr_base   14.0 M

Answer: It says which python3-pip has been installed: version 23.2.1-1.fc40 which has been built in the given copr repository
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Handling pip>=23.3.1; extra == 'test' from built wheel metadata: Requires-Dist (pipdeptre

Answer: It contains the requirements read from the built wheel metadata, including the version constraint - pip's version has to be greater or equal 23.3.1
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.u0cqMu (%check)
Child return code was: 1]: [The build failed during %check phase.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed in the test phase. Namely, test test_variants.py failed.
Resolution: You can temporary disable this check. 
You should report this to upstream and work with upstream on fixing the testsuite.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.u0cqMu (%check)
Child return code was: 1

Answer: The build failed during %check phase.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz2017632 > scr'
server exited unexpectedly]: [tmux has crashed]


Answer: Issue: tmux has crashed during an attempt to capture a screenshot
Resolution: This is a know issue. Please ask maintainers to fix it in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80294
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz2017632 > scr'
server exited unexpectedly

Answer: tmux has crashed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Some specified jars were not found]: [build classpath failed because some extensions are not available]
=============
[build-classpath]: [build is calling build-classpath tool]


Answer: Issue: build-classpath was during build, but failed to find all extension jars listed.
Resolution: add packages providing missing jars as build requires
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Some specified jars were not found

Answer: build classpath failed because some extensions are not available
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
build-classpath

Answer: build is calling build-classpath tool
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/unzip.h
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/zip.h
    File listed twice: /usr/lib64/libminizip-ng.so.4
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/mz*.h
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/unzip.h
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/zip.h
Child return code was: ]: [It says there are some files listed in %files section that are not installed.]
=============
[-DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/includ]: [This points to the CMake option that needs to be edited, so the files are installed correctly]


Answer: Issue: Because the minizip-ng from version 4 changed the  `CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR` CMake option. In previous version 3 it didn't included the 'minizip' path and it had to be added to the option like "-DCMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR=include/minizip". However, in new version 4, it is included and the "minizip" from the path needs to be removed, so the files are installed in the correct path
Resolution: Remove the "minizip" from CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR option.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/unzip.h
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/zip.h
    File listed twice: /usr/lib64/libminizip-ng.so.4
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/mz*.h
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/unzip.h
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/minizip-ng-4.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64/usr/include/minizip/zip.h
Child return code was: 

Answer: It says there are some files listed in %files section that are not installed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
-DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/includ

Answer: This points to the CMake option that needs to be edited, so the files are installed correctly
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'libselinux-devel >= 3.6-1'
No matching package to install: 'libsepol-devel >= 3.6-1'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun]: [These are missing dependencies. The package with this version can't be built without them.]


Answer: Issue: There are missing dependencies. 
Resolution: Add libsepol-devel >= 3.6-1 and libselinux-devel >= 3.6-1  the the buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'libselinux-devel >= 3.6-1'
No matching package to install: 'libsepol-devel >= 3.6-1'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be foun

Answer: These are missing dependencies. The package with this version can't be built without them.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [checking whether to install External API integration script: Enphase Monitor... enphase-monitor : Unable to find required programs in PATH: jq 
no
]: [shows that configure was looking for a dependency needed to build enphase monitor]
=============
[RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/nut-2.8.3-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/systemd/system/enphase-monitor@.service
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/nut-2.8.3-build/BUILDROOT/usr/libexec/enphase-monitor
]: [shows that enphase-monitor was expected to build but it's missing]


Answer: Issue: There is missing dependency that configure complains about, but it's not included in spec file
Resolution: Include required dependency to spec file so it is present in build environment
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
checking whether to install External API integration script: Enphase Monitor... enphase-monitor : Unable to find required programs in PATH: jq 
no


Answer: shows that configure was looking for a dependency needed to build enphase monitor
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/nut-2.8.3-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib/systemd/system/enphase-monitor@.service
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/nut-2.8.3-build/BUILDROOT/usr/libexec/enphase-monitor


Answer: shows that enphase-monitor was expected to build but it's missing
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ValueError: invalid pyproject.toml config: `project.license`.
configuration error: `project.license` must be valid exactly by one definition (2 matches found):
    - keys:
        'file': {type: string}
      required: ['file']
    - keys:
        'text': {type: string}
      required: ['text']]: [This error specifies that pyproject.toml content is invalid, in particular the "project.license" field.]


Answer: Issue: The file structure of pyproject.toml wasn't valid in the current environment, in particular the "project.license" field. That field needs to be a table with a "file" or a "text" key.
Please note that the specified project.license format was deprecated in favor of a simple text-only field in newer Python version. That means you might be trying to build a project expecting newer Python versions in an environment with older Python version.
Resolution: Adjust the pyproject.toml file and its included "project.license" field to match the specification. Alternatively, if you want to use a text-only definition of the field, use a newer Python version to build it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ValueError: invalid pyproject.toml config: `project.license`.
configuration error: `project.license` must be valid exactly by one definition (2 matches found):
    - keys:
        'file': {type: string}
      required: ['file']
    - keys:
        'text': {type: string}
      required: ['text']

Answer: This error specifies that pyproject.toml content is invalid, in particular the "project.license" field.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [stdout: Downloading emacs-29.4.tar.xz from fejfighter/emacs-rpm at github.com:
]: [The tarball emacs-29.4.tar.xz should be downloaded from fejfighter/emacs-rpm at github.com.]
=============
[Removed downloaded invalid file /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-8fqckqg4/emacs-rpm/emacs-29.4.tar.xz
Server returned status code 404.]: [Requested file can't be downloaded. Server returns 404 error (Not Found).]


Answer: Issue: The requested tarball can't be downloaded from the github.com. The file is missing.
Resolution: Please verify your tarball source link is correct.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
stdout: Downloading emacs-29.4.tar.xz from fejfighter/emacs-rpm at github.com:


Answer: The tarball emacs-29.4.tar.xz should be downloaded from fejfighter/emacs-rpm at github.com.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Removed downloaded invalid file /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-8fqckqg4/emacs-rpm/emacs-29.4.tar.xz
Server returned status code 404.

Answer: Requested file can't be downloaded. Server returns 404 error (Not Found).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [./if_py_both.h:2423:15: error: call to undeclared function 'PySequence_Fast_GET_ITEM'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
 2423 |                 keyObject = PySequence_Fast_GET_ITEM(fast, 0);]: [This is the error causing the build to fail.]


Answer: Issue: PySequence_Fast_GET_ITEM is missing a function declaration (-Wimplicit-function-declaration)
Resolution: Add a function declaration for this function.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
./if_py_both.h:2423:15: error: call to undeclared function 'PySequence_Fast_GET_ITEM'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
 2423 |                 keyObject = PySequence_Fast_GET_ITEM(fast, 0);

Answer: This is the error causing the build to fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: python3-pytest > 10]: [The snippet shows missing dependency.]


Answer: Issue: There is no pytest > 10 in Fedora hence the package fails to build.
Resolution: Update pytest to the required version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: python3-pytest > 10

Answer: The snippet shows missing dependency.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
ImportError: cannot import name 'cached_property' from 'werkzeu]: [Relevant python error saying that `cached_property` cannot be imported from the `werkzeug` package.]


Answer: Issue: This package doesn't work with the latest version of the `python3-werkzeug` package because Werkzeug introduced backward incompatible changes in its 1.0 version.

Upstream issue:
https://github.com/noirbizarre/flask-restplus/issues/777
Resolution: Specify the compatible version of the python3-werkzeug package in your specfile: 

    BuildRequires: python3-werkzeug >= 0.16.0 
    BuildRequires: python3-werkzeug < 1.0.0
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ImportError: cannot import name 'cached_property' from 'werkzeu

Answer: Relevant python error saying that `cached_property` cannot be imported from the `werkzeug` package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [npm error code ENOTFOUND
npm error syscall getaddrinfo
npm error errno ENOTFOUND
npm error network request to https://registry.npmjs.org/css-loader failed, reason: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND registry.npmjs.org
npm error network This is a problem related to network connectivity.
npm error network In most cases you are behind a proxy or have bad network settings.
npm error network
npm error network If you are behind a proxy, please make sure that the
npm error network 'proxy' config is set properly.  See: 'npm help config']: [Request to npm repository has failed.]


Answer: Issue: The request to npm package repository has failed, causing build failure, as necessary dependencies couldn't be installed.
Resolution: Ensure that your network connection is fully functional and that the npm repository is online and reachable from you region. It is possible that you have problems with network settings.

Misconfigured proxy, VPN or firewall could be the issue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
npm error code ENOTFOUND
npm error syscall getaddrinfo
npm error errno ENOTFOUND
npm error network request to https://registry.npmjs.org/css-loader failed, reason: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND registry.npmjs.org
npm error network This is a problem related to network connectivity.
npm error network In most cases you are behind a proxy or have bad network settings.
npm error network
npm error network If you are behind a proxy, please make sure that the
npm error network 'proxy' config is set properly.  See: 'npm help config'

Answer: Request to npm repository has failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.4-11.4.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/man/man1/myrocks_hotbackup.1*': No such file or directory
]: ['rm' command failed. File do not exist.

This can happen e.g. after package rebase, when the content of the sources changes.

Usually happens in %prep or %install sections]
=============
[RPM build warnings:

RPM build errors:
    Macro expanded in comment on line 1499: %{_datadir}/%{majorname}/errmsg-utf8.txt]: [RPMbuild warning.

The RPMbuild expands macros everywhere in the SPECfile, even in the changelog and comments.
prepend all macros you wan't to prevent expanding with extra %.
e.g.: "%{_datadir}" will expand
"%%{_datadir}" will not expand.]


Answer: Issue: 'rm' command failed. File do not exist.
Resolution: Check the SPECfile. Find the specific 'rm' command.

Find out why the file is missing.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.4-11.4.5-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/man/man1/myrocks_hotbackup.1*': No such file or directory


Answer: 'rm' command failed. File do not exist.

This can happen e.g. after package rebase, when the content of the sources changes.

Usually happens in %prep or %install sections
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build warnings:

RPM build errors:
    Macro expanded in comment on line 1499: %{_datadir}/%{majorname}/errmsg-utf8.txt

Answer: RPMbuild warning.

The RPMbuild expands macros everywhere in the SPECfile, even in the changelog and comments.
prepend all macros you wan't to prevent expanding with extra %.
e.g.: "%{_datadir}" will expand
"%%{_datadir}" will not expand.