fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/opencv-qt6-4.11.0-build/opencv-4.11.0/modules/dnn/include/opencv2/dnn/dnn.inl.hpp:377:21,

Answer: This snippet suggests strong evidence that the build failure used in the openSUSE Build Service (OBS) for building RPM packages
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[  452s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/opencv-qt6-4.11.0-build/opencv-4.11.0/modules/core/include/opencv2/core/utility.hpp:1096:15: warning: argument 1 value ‘18446744073709551615’ exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Walloc-size-larger-than=]
[  452s]  1096 |         ptr = new _Tp[_size];

Answer: This snippet, repeated multiple times but originating from this specific location (and similar ones in other DNN-related files), highlights the core issue. It shows a warning at a specific line (utility.hpp:1096) where a new allocation is being attempted with an extremely large size. The -Walloc-size-larger-than= flag clearly indicates the nature of the problem. This tells a developer to look at the code leading up to this allocation in opencv2/core/utility.hpp and the calling functions within the DNN module (like caffe_importer.cpp, onnx_importer.cpp, etc.) to understand why such a large size is being requested.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Running pre-install scriptlet: tog-pegasus-libs-2:2.14.1-81.fc43.x86_64     
DEBUG util.py:459:  >>> Error in pre-install scriptlet: tog-pegasus-libs-2:2.14.1-81.fc43.x86_64    
DEBUG util.py:459:  >>> Scriptlet output:      ]: [broken DNF transaction]


Answer: Issue: pre-install script failed, there is a syntax error
Resolution: Remove syntax issue
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Running pre-install scriptlet: tog-pegasus-libs-2:2.14.1-81.fc43.x86_64     
DEBUG util.py:459:  >>> Error in pre-install scriptlet: tog-pegasus-libs-2:2.14.1-81.fc43.x86_64    
DEBUG util.py:459:  >>> Scriptlet output:      

Answer: broken DNF transaction
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [src/time.c:758:20: error: assignment to 'sighandler' {aka 'void (*)(void)'} from incompatible pointer type '__sighandler_t' {aka 'void (*)(int)'} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  758 |   interrupt_signal = signal (SIGINT, SIG_IGN);
      |                    ^
src/time.c:79:22: note: 'sighandler' declared here
   79 | typedef RETSIGTYPE (*sighandler) ();
      |                      ^~~~~~~~~~]: [It shows the error from GCC, which is the reason why the build fails.]


Answer: Issue: The build fails because GCC reports an error during compilation of the package.
Resolution: Work with upstream code and create a patch that fixes the GCC error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
src/time.c:758:20: error: assignment to 'sighandler' {aka 'void (*)(void)'} from incompatible pointer type '__sighandler_t' {aka 'void (*)(int)'} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  758 |   interrupt_signal = signal (SIGINT, SIG_IGN);
      |                    ^
src/time.c:79:22: note: 'sighandler' declared here
   79 | typedef RETSIGTYPE (*sighandler) ();
      |                      ^~~~~~~~~~

Answer: It shows the error from GCC, which is the reason why the build fails.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [    error: downloading 'https://github.com/SebWouters/CheMPS2/archive/d8ac508.tar.gz' failed
          status_code: 6
          status_string: "Could not resolve hostname"
          log:
          --- LOG BEGIN ---
          Could not resolve host: github.com
  shutting down connection #0
          --- LOG END ---]: [System could not resolve github.com hostname.]


Answer: Issue: It was not possible to download archive required for the build.
Resolution: Check the availability of required host or network connectivity of build machine.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    error: downloading 'https://github.com/SebWouters/CheMPS2/archive/d8ac508.tar.gz' failed
          status_code: 6
          status_string: "Could not resolve hostname"
          log:
          --- LOG BEGIN ---
          Could not resolve host: github.com
  shutting down connection #0
          --- LOG END ---

Answer: System could not resolve github.com hostname.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 09:37:02 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Running 'rpmbuild -vv --define='_topdir /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69' -bc SPECS/json-c.spec'
D: created directory(s) /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69/BUILD mode 0755
D: created directory(s) /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69/RPMS mode 0755
D: created directory(s) /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69/SRPMS mode 0755
D: created directory(s) /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69/BUILDROOT mode 0755
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1730851200
D: PRAGMA secure_delete = OFF: 0
D: PRAGMA case_sensitive_like = ON: 0
D: ========== +++ json-c-0.18-3.el10 x86_64/linux 0x0
D: loading keyring from rpmdb
D:  read h#     482
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D: added key gpg-pubkey-e37ed158-65785fa9 to keyring
D:  read h#     618
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D:  Requires: cmake                                         YES (db provides)
D:  Requires: doxygen                                       NO
D:  read h#     603
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D:  Requires: gcc                                           YES (db provides)
D:  read h#     103
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D:  Requires: hardlink                                      YES (db provides)
D:  Requires: ninja-build                                   NO
D:  read h#     611
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D:  Requires: valgrind                                      YES (db provides)
error: Failed build dependencies:
    doxygen is needed by json-c-0.18-3.el10.x86_64
    ninja-build is needed by json-c-0.18-3.el10.x86_64
:: [ 09:37:02 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'rpmbuild -vv --define='_topdir /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69' -bc SPECS/json-c.spec' (Expected 0, got 11)]: [Indication of failure when installing dependencies.]
=============
[:: [ 09:36:57 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'dnf install -y ninja-build valgrind cmake doxygen rpm-build libtool json-c --enablerepo=rhel-CRB --enablerepo=rhel-buildroot' (Expected 0, got 1)
]: [Another indication of failure when installing dependencies.]


Answer: Issue: Dependencies were not installed.
Resolution: Check main.fmf of the test, if the dependencies are mentioned, also check if the repo files are not broken and fix found issues.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 09:37:02 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Running 'rpmbuild -vv --define='_topdir /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69' -bc SPECS/json-c.spec'
D: created directory(s) /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69/BUILD mode 0755
D: created directory(s) /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69/RPMS mode 0755
D: created directory(s) /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69/SRPMS mode 0755
D: created directory(s) /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69/BUILDROOT mode 0755
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1730851200
D: PRAGMA secure_delete = OFF: 0
D: PRAGMA case_sensitive_like = ON: 0
D: ========== +++ json-c-0.18-3.el10 x86_64/linux 0x0
D: loading keyring from rpmdb
D:  read h#     482
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D: added key gpg-pubkey-e37ed158-65785fa9 to keyring
D:  read h#     618
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D:  Requires: cmake                                         YES (db provides)
D:  Requires: doxygen                                       NO
D:  read h#     603
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D:  Requires: gcc                                           YES (db provides)
D:  read h#     103
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D:  Requires: hardlink                                      YES (db provides)
D:  Requires: ninja-build                                   NO
D:  read h#     611
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
D:  Requires: valgrind                                      YES (db provides)
error: Failed build dependencies:
    doxygen is needed by json-c-0.18-3.el10.x86_64
    ninja-build is needed by json-c-0.18-3.el10.x86_64
:: [ 09:37:02 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'rpmbuild -vv --define='_topdir /tmp/tmp.BHgdA4Wt69' -bc SPECS/json-c.spec' (Expected 0, got 11)

Answer: Indication of failure when installing dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 09:36:57 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'dnf install -y ninja-build valgrind cmake doxygen rpm-build libtool json-c --enablerepo=rhel-CRB --enablerepo=rhel-buildroot' (Expected 0, got 1)


Answer: Another indication of failure when installing dependencies.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad file: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-1r884s0e/python-APScheduler/apscheduler-3.10.4.tar.gz: No such file or directory]: [Build error indicating that `/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-1r884s0e/python-APScheduler/apscheduler-3.10.4.tar.gz`is not present.]
=============
[RPM build errors:]: [Start of build error report.]
=============
[Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dist-git-client", line 10, in <module>
    main()
    ~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/dist_git_client.py", line 494, in main
    srpm(args, config)
    ~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/dist_git_client.py", line 348, in srpm
    check_call(command)
    ~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/dist_git_client.py", line 50, in check_call
    subprocess.check_call(cmd)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['rpmbuild', '-bs', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-APScheduler.spec', '--define', 'dist %nil', '--define', '_sourcedir /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-1r884s0e/python-APScheduler/.', '--define', '_srcrpmdir /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results', '--define', '_disable_source_fetch 1']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
]: [RPM build traceback, caused by the detected error but irrelevant for diagnosis.]


Answer: Issue: File, specifically an archive `/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-1r884s0e/python-APScheduler/apscheduler-3.10.4.tar.gz` was missing.
Resolution: Ensure that all required files are present in an appropriate location before build starts.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad file: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-1r884s0e/python-APScheduler/apscheduler-3.10.4.tar.gz: No such file or directory

Answer: Build error indicating that `/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-1r884s0e/python-APScheduler/apscheduler-3.10.4.tar.gz`is not present.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:

Answer: Start of build error report.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dist-git-client", line 10, in <module>
    main()
    ~~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/dist_git_client.py", line 494, in main
    srpm(args, config)
    ~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/dist_git_client.py", line 348, in srpm
    check_call(command)
    ~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/dist_git_client.py", line 50, in check_call
    subprocess.check_call(cmd)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['rpmbuild', '-bs', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/python-APScheduler.spec', '--define', 'dist %nil', '--define', '_sourcedir /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-1r884s0e/python-APScheduler/.', '--define', '_srcrpmdir /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results', '--define', '_disable_source_fetch 1']' returned non-zero exit status 1.


Answer: RPM build traceback, caused by the detected error but irrelevant for diagnosis.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: ld returned 1 exit status]: [Error that caused the build to fail]
=============
[/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: bad value
]: [Explanation how the 'ld' failed]
=============
[/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccz4zYRT.ltrans127.ltrans.o: relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against `_ZN5tpoolL15tls_worker_dataE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC]: [Suggested solution: recompile with -fPIC]


Answer: Issue: A binary requires to be compiled with '-fPIC' compilation flag, but it is missing.
Resolution: Make sure the compilation flag is propagated correctly through the build process.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: ld returned 1 exit status

Answer: Error that caused the build to fail
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: bad value


Answer: Explanation how the 'ld' failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccz4zYRT.ltrans127.ltrans.o: relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against `_ZN5tpoolL15tls_worker_dataE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

Answer: Suggested solution: recompile with -fPIC
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [STEP 9/17: RUN nginx -v 2>&1 | grep -qe "nginx/$NGINX_VERSION\." && echo "Found VERSION $NGINX_VERSION"
Error: building at STEP "RUN nginx -v 2>&1 | grep -qe "nginx/$NGINX_VERSION\." && echo "Found VERSION $NGINX_VERSION"": while running runtime: exit status 1
errexit on line 33, common/build.sh
errexit on line 33, common/build.sh
errexit on line 41, common/build.sh
errexit on line 42, common/build.sh
errexit on line 61, common/build.sh
errexit on line 61, common/build.sh]: [The version of package does not equal to required]


Answer: Issue: The package installation was successful, but the expected package version is different. 
Resolution: Thank about to use either version based package or enable installation of modules
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
STEP 9/17: RUN nginx -v 2>&1 | grep -qe "nginx/$NGINX_VERSION\." && echo "Found VERSION $NGINX_VERSION"
Error: building at STEP "RUN nginx -v 2>&1 | grep -qe "nginx/$NGINX_VERSION\." && echo "Found VERSION $NGINX_VERSION"": while running runtime: exit status 1
errexit on line 33, common/build.sh
errexit on line 33, common/build.sh
errexit on line 41, common/build.sh
errexit on line 42, common/build.sh
errexit on line 61, common/build.sh
errexit on line 61, common/build.sh

Answer: The version of package does not equal to required
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [stdout: Wrote: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/pycharm-community-plugins.spec
stderr: warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/8183/599893/GitLink-4.5.2.zip#/GitLink-4.5.2.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/GitLink-4.5.2.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/7792/100135/intellij-ansible-0.11.2.zip#/intellij-ansible-0.11.2.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/intellij-ansible-0.11.2.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/12552/373650/intellij-rpmspec-2.2.0.zip#/intellij-rpmspec-2.2.0.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/intellij-rpmspec-2.2.0.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/7724/715275/clouds-docker-impl-251.23774.426.zip#/clouds-docker-impl-251.23774.426.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/clouds-docker-impl-251.23774.426.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/164/718030/IdeaVIM-2.22.0.zip#/IdeaVIM-2.22.0.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/IdeaVIM-2.22.0.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/6981/711004/ini-251.23774.318.zip#/ini-251.23774.318.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/ini-251.23774.318.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/7566/711171/settingsRepository-251.23774.318.zip#/settingsRepository-251.23774.318.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/settingsRepository-251.23774.318.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/7495/678216/ignore-4.5.6.zip#/ignore-4.5.6.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/ignore-4.5.6.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/9525/711041/env_files-251.23774.318.zip#/env-files-251.23774.318.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/env-files-251.23774.318.zip
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 403
error: Executing url helper "/usr/bin/curl --proto -all,+https,+ftps  --silent --show-error --fail --globoff --location -o /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/env-files-251.23774.318.zip https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/9525/711041/env_files-251.23774.318.zip#/env-files-251.23774.318.zip" failed with status 22
error: Couldn't download https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/9525/711041/env_files-251.23774.318.zip#/env-files-251.23774.318.zip
]: [Building SRPM failed because URL does not exists]


Answer: Issue: The build of SRPM package failed because URL specified in SPEC file is wrong
Resolution: Please take a look at the corresponding SPEC file and define proper URL
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
stdout: Wrote: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/pycharm-community-plugins.spec
stderr: warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/8183/599893/GitLink-4.5.2.zip#/GitLink-4.5.2.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/GitLink-4.5.2.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/7792/100135/intellij-ansible-0.11.2.zip#/intellij-ansible-0.11.2.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/intellij-ansible-0.11.2.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/12552/373650/intellij-rpmspec-2.2.0.zip#/intellij-rpmspec-2.2.0.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/intellij-rpmspec-2.2.0.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/7724/715275/clouds-docker-impl-251.23774.426.zip#/clouds-docker-impl-251.23774.426.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/clouds-docker-impl-251.23774.426.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/164/718030/IdeaVIM-2.22.0.zip#/IdeaVIM-2.22.0.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/IdeaVIM-2.22.0.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/6981/711004/ini-251.23774.318.zip#/ini-251.23774.318.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/ini-251.23774.318.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/7566/711171/settingsRepository-251.23774.318.zip#/settingsRepository-251.23774.318.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/settingsRepository-251.23774.318.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/7495/678216/ignore-4.5.6.zip#/ignore-4.5.6.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/ignore-4.5.6.zip
warning: Downloading https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/9525/711041/env_files-251.23774.318.zip#/env-files-251.23774.318.zip to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/env-files-251.23774.318.zip
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 403
error: Executing url helper "/usr/bin/curl --proto -all,+https,+ftps  --silent --show-error --fail --globoff --location -o /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/env-files-251.23774.318.zip https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/9525/711041/env_files-251.23774.318.zip#/env-files-251.23774.318.zip" failed with status 22
error: Couldn't download https://plugins.jetbrains.com/files/9525/711041/env_files-251.23774.318.zip#/env-files-251.23774.318.zip


Answer: Building SRPM failed because URL does not exists
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
/usr/bin/ld: ../DiscIO/libdiscio.a(CompressedBlob.cpp.o): undefined reference to symbol 'inflateEnd'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libz.so.1: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command li]: [Incorrect reference to symbol 'inflateEnd']


Answer: Issue: The dependency minizip-ng has been rebased to new major version, which must have changed it symbols in the library
Resolution: The maintainer should check the changes in the new minizip-ng library and change the source code to adhere to these changes.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

/usr/bin/ld: ../DiscIO/libdiscio.a(CompressedBlob.cpp.o): undefined reference to symbol 'inflateEnd'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libz.so.1: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command li

Answer: Incorrect reference to symbol 'inflateEnd'
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/pytest -Wdefault
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Mrz6o7: line 48: /usr/bin/pytest: No such file or directory]: [The snippet shows missing pytest needed for the tests.]


Answer: Issue: The BuildRequire on pytest is missing in the spec file.
Resolution: BuildRequire pytest
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/pytest -Wdefault
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Mrz6o7: line 48: /usr/bin/pytest: No such file or directory

Answer: The snippet shows missing pytest needed for the tests.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Copr build error: Build fail]: [Final build failure message.]
=============
[FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_language_support.py::test_languages_query_results_match_javascript_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_language_support.py::test_js_serialized_lang_index_can_be_loaded_and_produces_same_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_language_support.py::test_serialized_lang_index_can_be_loaded_in_js_and_produces_same_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_language_support.py::test_serialized_multilang_index_can_be_loaded_in_js_and_results_equal
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_mkdocs.py::test_mkdocs_produces_same_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_mkdocs.py::test_js_serialized_index_can_be_loaded_and_produces_same_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_mkdocs.py::test_serialized_index_can_be_loaded_in_js_and_produces_same_results]: [List of failed tests.]
=============
[FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'node']: [Expected file does not exist.]
=============
[FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'node']: [Expected file does not exist.]
=============
[FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'node']: [Expected file does not exist.]
=============
[Resource stopwords not found.]: [Resource 'stopwords' could not be found. ]
=============
[Resource stopwords not found.]: [Resource 'stopwords' could not be found. ]
=============
[Resource stopwords not found.]: [Resource 'stopwords' could not be found. ]
=============
[Resource stopwords not found.]: [Resource 'stopwords' could not be found. ]


Answer: Issue: Multiple errors were encountered by python test modules. This can be genuine failure of the tested code, or failure of testing code itself.
Resolution: Resolve individual errors in tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_language_support.py::test_languages_query_results_match_javascript_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_language_support.py::test_js_serialized_lang_index_can_be_loaded_and_produces_same_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_language_support.py::test_serialized_lang_index_can_be_loaded_in_js_and_produces_same_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_language_support.py::test_serialized_multilang_index_can_be_loaded_in_js_and_results_equal
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_mkdocs.py::test_mkdocs_produces_same_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_mkdocs.py::test_js_serialized_index_can_be_loaded_and_produces_same_results
FAILED tests/acceptance_tests/test_mkdocs.py::test_serialized_index_can_be_loaded_in_js_and_produces_same_results

Answer: List of failed tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'node'

Answer: Expected file does not exist.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Resource stopwords not found.

Answer: Resource 'stopwords' could not be found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [cmd: ['rpkg', 'srpm', '--outdir', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results', '--spec', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-5nxhm5kx/thunderbird-nightly-copr/thunderbird-nightly.spec']
cwd: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-5nxhm5kx/thunderbird-nightly-copr
rc: 1
stdout: Wrote: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/thunderbird-nightly.spec
stderr: warning: Downloading https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/nightly/latest-comm-central-l10n/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
error: Executing url helper "/usr/bin/curl --proto -all,+https,+ftps  --silent --show-error --fail --globoff --location -o /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/nightly/latest-comm-central-l10n/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2" failed with status 22
error: Couldn't download https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/nightly/latest-comm-central-l10n/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2
]: [Attempt to download remote file `https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/nightly/latest-comm-central-l10n/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2` has failed due to error 404.]


Answer: Issue: Requested file couldn't be downloaded due to http error 404. This status code indicates that the origin server did not find a current representation for the target resource or is not willing to disclose that one exists.  A 404 status code does not indicate whether this lack of representation is temporary or permanent.
Resolution: Verify URL of the file you need. It ispossible that URL may simply be incorrect, and that the file exists at a different path. Contact administrator of the server if it appears that the issue is caused by a mistake on their part.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
cmd: ['rpkg', 'srpm', '--outdir', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results', '--spec', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-5nxhm5kx/thunderbird-nightly-copr/thunderbird-nightly.spec']
cwd: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-5nxhm5kx/thunderbird-nightly-copr
rc: 1
stdout: Wrote: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/thunderbird-nightly.spec
stderr: warning: Downloading https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/nightly/latest-comm-central-l10n/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
error: Executing url helper "/usr/bin/curl --proto -all,+https,+ftps  --silent --show-error --fail --globoff --location -o /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/nightly/latest-comm-central-l10n/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2" failed with status 22
error: Couldn't download https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/nightly/latest-comm-central-l10n/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2


Answer: Attempt to download remote file `https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/nightly/latest-comm-central-l10n/thunderbird-92.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2` has failed due to error 404.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.]: [Build failure description.]


Answer: Issue: Missing tox configuration.
Resolution: Add or generate tox configuration file to expected location.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.

Answer: Build failure description.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Some test(s) failed.]: [Error message, some test(s) failed.]
=============
[FAIL: Test-proxied-https-auth.px
FAIL: Test-proxied-https-auth-keepalive.px]: [Failed tests]
=============
[============================================================================
Testsuite summary for wget 1.25.0 (Red Hat modified)
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 88
# PASS:  78
# SKIP:  8
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  2
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0]: [Testsuite summary]


Answer: Issue: Ttest failed when running the %check phase of the build.
Resolution: Either issue in the code or in the test itself needs to be resolved. It might be a good idea to contact upstream developers.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Some test(s) failed.

Answer: Error message, some test(s) failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAIL: Test-proxied-https-auth.px
FAIL: Test-proxied-https-auth-keepalive.px

Answer: Failed tests
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for wget 1.25.0 (Red Hat modified)
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 88
# PASS:  78
# SKIP:  8
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  2
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

Answer: Testsuite summary
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [E   ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tests.x509']: [The test module tests/hazmat/primitives/test_pkcs7.py is trying to import something from tests.x509, but that module can't be found. This suggests a problem with the structure of the cryptography source code within the build environment.]


Answer: Issue: This RPM build failure is happening during the %check phase, which is when the built package is tested.  The core issue is a ModuleNotFoundError within the Python cryptography library's test suite.
Resolution: The most probable cause is that the source code as it's laid out in the build directory (/builddir/build/BUILD/python-cryptography-44.0.0-build/cryptography-44.0.0) is different from what the tests expect.  The tests.x509 module might be in a different location, renamed, or perhaps even missing entirely in the version being built.  This could be due to a packaging issue, a corrupted source archive, or modifications to the build process.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
E   ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tests.x509'

Answer: The test module tests/hazmat/primitives/test_pkcs7.py is trying to import something from tests.x509, but that module can't be found. This suggests a problem with the structure of the cryptography source code within the build environment.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.11.2
]: [there is no suitable version of the pydantic]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(python-dotenv) >= 1.1
]: [there is no suitable version of the python-dotenv]


Answer: Issue: dependencies have lower version than is required by the package
Resolution: check if it's possible to relax the version requirements, if not, then upgrade the dependencies to the newer versions that are supported
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.11.2


Answer: there is no suitable version of the pydantic
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: python3dist(python-dotenv) >= 1.1


Answer: there is no suitable version of the python-dotenv
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Dynamic buildrequires detected
Going to install missing buildrequires. See root.log for details]: [This is problem in the relevant part in build log about missing build dependencies]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:461:  Failed to resolve the transaction]: [It explains that dnf was not able to install required build dependencies.]
=============
[DEBUG util.py:461:  No match for argument: python3dist(scikit-learn]: [There are details about missing dependencies mentioned in previous snipped]


Answer: Issue: It was not possible to install build dependencies on this architeture
Resolution: Check whether build dependency is really available for the architecture or whether it is just a typo.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Dynamic buildrequires detected
Going to install missing buildrequires. See root.log for details

Answer: This is problem in the relevant part in build log about missing build dependencies
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  Failed to resolve the transaction

Answer: It explains that dnf was not able to install required build dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  No match for argument: python3dist(scikit-learn

Answer: There are details about missing dependencies mentioned in previous snipped
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  ["/usr/bin/perl" "/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ExtUtils/xsubpp"  -typemap '/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap' -typemap '/home/test/fedora/perl-EV/perl-EV-4.34-build/EV-4.34/typemap'  EV.xs > EV.xsc
Unrecognized escape \S passed through at (eval 77) line 2, <__ANONIO__> line 868.
EV.c: In function ‘XS_EV__Watcher_is_active’:
EV.c:1472:45: error: ‘stash_’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘stash_io’?
 1472 |               && (SvSTASH (SvRV (ST(0))) == stash_" . (ev_watcher * =~ /ev_(S+)/, "int") . "
      |                                             ^~~~~~
      |                                             stash_io]: [xsubpp tool warns and a compiler exits with an error.]


Answer: Issue: ExtUtils::ParseXS 3.57 removed refactored typemap parser and stopped recognizing never formally supported quoting with double quotes character.
Resolution: EV's typemap file needs to be updated use ${} substitution instead of quoting with `"' in T_WATCHER mapping.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
"/usr/bin/perl" "/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ExtUtils/xsubpp"  -typemap '/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap' -typemap '/home/test/fedora/perl-EV/perl-EV-4.34-build/EV-4.34/typemap'  EV.xs > EV.xsc
Unrecognized escape \S passed through at (eval 77) line 2, <__ANONIO__> line 868.
EV.c: In function ‘XS_EV__Watcher_is_active’:
EV.c:1472:45: error: ‘stash_’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘stash_io’?
 1472 |               && (SvSTASH (SvRV (ST(0))) == stash_" . (ev_watcher * =~ /ev_(S+)/, "int") . "
      |                                             ^~~~~~
      |                                             stash_io

Answer: xsubpp tool warns and a compiler exits with an error.