fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: 'udisks_linux_nvme_controller_parent_class' undeclared (first use in this function)]: [The relevant error message saying that the 'udisks_linux_nvme_controller_parent_class' symbol is undeclared.]
=============
[warning: no previous prototype for 'udisks_linux_nvme_controler_get_type' [-Wmissing-prototypes]]: [Relevant context provided by the compiler saying that the 'udisks_linux_nvme_controler_get_type' symbol is missing a prototype.]
=============
[did you mean 'udisks_linux_nvme_controler_parent_class'?]: [Relevant compiler hint suggesting use of a different, but available symbol.]


Answer: Issue: A typo in the GObject 'G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_CODE' macro that is used for object definition boilerplate failed the build.
Resolution: First check that the arguments comply to the suggested GObject naming conventions. Next check the GObject boilerplate code and naming of actual required functions. In this case the 'GType                 udisks_linux_nvme_controller_get_type (void) G_GNUC_CONST;' definition in the header file must comply with the 'G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_CODE' macro 't_n' type name argument, which in this case differs due to a typo.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: 'udisks_linux_nvme_controller_parent_class' undeclared (first use in this function)

Answer: The relevant error message saying that the 'udisks_linux_nvme_controller_parent_class' symbol is undeclared.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
warning: no previous prototype for 'udisks_linux_nvme_controler_get_type' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Answer: Relevant context provided by the compiler saying that the 'udisks_linux_nvme_controler_get_type' symbol is missing a prototype.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
did you mean 'udisks_linux_nvme_controler_parent_class'?

Answer: Relevant compiler hint suggesting use of a different, but available symbol.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [E   ImportError: libcpuid.so.17: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory]: [It contains the Python exception which lists the shared C library that cannot be linked.]


Answer: Issue: The pytest binary does not look for shared libraries in %{buildroot}%{_libdir}, therefore the import of CFFI python bindings of libpcuid fails.
Resolution: Add %{buildroot}%{_libdir} to LD_LIBRARY_PATH prior to running the tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
E   ImportError: libcpuid.so.17: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Answer: It contains the Python exception which lists the shared C library that cannot be linked.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc41.ppc64le.debug
    absolute symlink: /usr/bin/clang-format-diff -> /usr/share/clang/clang-format-diff.py
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc41.ppc64le.debug
]: [Multiple installed but unpackaged files found.]


Answer: Issue: Unpackaged files were installed by the package. This is a serious issue. Unpackaged files are not tracked by package manager. They may cause conflicts, lingering files, and even security issues
Resolution: Ensure that all files installed by the package are properly tracked, by listing them in the spec files. Either directly or through macro.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc41.ppc64le.debug
    absolute symlink: /usr/bin/clang-format-diff -> /usr/share/clang/clang-format-diff.py
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc41.ppc64le.debug


Answer: Multiple installed but unpackaged files found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: bash-completion-devel]: [This snippet lists the unavailable package.]


Answer: Issue: The build BuildRequires a package that doesn't exist.
Resolution: Update the spec file to list the correct and available build requirements.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: bash-completion-devel

Answer: This snippet lists the unavailable package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar]: [It's not possible to install all required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed package (dnf-data).]


Answer: Issue: It was not possible to install all the required packages needed for building the package.
Resolution: Resolve the conflict first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar

Answer: It's not possible to install all required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed package (dnf-data).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/thumbnailprovider/thumbnailgenerator.cpp.rej
]: [There the build failed]


Answer: Issue: The patch failed to apply
Resolution: Review the patch and modify it so it can be applied correctly. The file containing the rejects will help you to see what parts of the patch actually failed. Most common ways the hunk can fail are either when the baseline code is already patched or when the baseline code changed significantly enough.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/thumbnailprovider/thumbnailgenerator.cpp.rej


Answer: There the build failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
= 2 failed, 1051 passed, 20 skipped, 7 deselected, 5 xfailed, 1 xpassed in 83.86s (0:01:23)]: [Two tests failed, 5 failed with caveats.]
=============
[self = EntryPoint(name='foo', value='invalid-identifier:foo', group='foo')

    @property
    def extras(self) -> List[str]:
        match = self.pattern.match(self.value)
>       assert match is not None
E       AssertionError

/usr/lib64/python3.13/importlib/metadata/__init__.py:197: AssertionError]: [Test assertion was broken.]
=============
[
_________ [doctest] pkg_resources.NullProvider._validate_resource_path _________
1609 >>> vrp('foo/../../bar.txt')
1610 >>> bool(warned)
1611 True
1612 >>> warned.clear()
1613 >>> vrp('foo/f../bar.txt')
1614 >>> bool(warned)
1615 False
1616 
1617 Windows path separators are straight-up disallowed.
1618 >>> vrp(r'\foo/bar.txt')
Expected:
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    ...
    ValueError: Use of .. or absolute path in a resource path is not allowed.
Got nothing

/builddir/build/BUILD/setuptools-68.2.2/pkg_resources/__init__.py:1618: DocTestFail]: [Test assertion was broken.]
=============
[ extra tokens at the end of %endif directive in line 230:  %endif # with test]: [Specfile syntax was violated.]


Answer: Issue: Multiple tests have failed.
Resolution: Check if test failures are connected to actual issues, and not false positives. If they are indeed caused by deficiencies in user code, fix them and submit the build again.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

= 2 failed, 1051 passed, 20 skipped, 7 deselected, 5 xfailed, 1 xpassed in 83.86s (0:01:23)

Answer: Two tests failed, 5 failed with caveats.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
self = EntryPoint(name='foo', value='invalid-identifier:foo', group='foo')

    @property
    def extras(self) -> List[str]:
        match = self.pattern.match(self.value)
>       assert match is not None
E       AssertionError

/usr/lib64/python3.13/importlib/metadata/__init__.py:197: AssertionError

Answer: Test assertion was broken.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

_________ [doctest] pkg_resources.NullProvider._validate_resource_path _________
1609 >>> vrp('foo/../../bar.txt')
1610 >>> bool(warned)
1611 True
1612 >>> warned.clear()
1613 >>> vrp('foo/f../bar.txt')
1614 >>> bool(warned)
1615 False
1616 
1617 Windows path separators are straight-up disallowed.
1618 >>> vrp(r'\foo/bar.txt')
Expected:
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    ...
    ValueError: Use of .. or absolute path in a resource path is not allowed.
Got nothing

/builddir/build/BUILD/setuptools-68.2.2/pkg_resources/__init__.py:1618: DocTestFail

Answer: Test assertion was broken.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 extra tokens at the end of %endif directive in line 230:  %endif # with test

Answer: Specfile syntax was violated.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [libtool: compile:  gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"ReadStat\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"readstat\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1.1.9\" "-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"ReadStat 1.1.9\"" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"https://github.com/WizardMac/ReadStat/issues\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"https://github.com/WizardMac/ReadStat\" -DPACKAGE=\"readstat\" -DVERSION=\"1.1.9\" -DHAVE_STDIO_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DLT_OBJDIR=\".libs/\" -DHAVE_ICONV=1 -DICONV_CONST= -I. -g -Wall -Werror -pedantic-errors -std=c99 -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -c src/spss/readstat_por_write.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o src/spss/.libs/libreadstat_la-readstat_por_write.o
src/spss/readstat_por_write.c: In function 'por_emit_header':
src/spss/readstat_por_write.c:206:5: error: 'strncpy' output may be truncated copying 20 bytes from a string of length 256 [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
  206 |     strncpy(vanity[1] + 20, writer->file_label, 20);
      |     ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors]: [This snippet shows the error which caused the build to fail. The error comes from the gcc command.]


Answer: Issue: During the compilation via gcc the compiler has found errors in the upstream code.
Resolution: Work with the upstream code and prepare a patch that fixes the error, or apply a workaround that suppresses the error:
`CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wno-error=stringop-truncation"`
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
libtool: compile:  gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"ReadStat\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"readstat\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1.1.9\" "-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"ReadStat 1.1.9\"" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"https://github.com/WizardMac/ReadStat/issues\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"https://github.com/WizardMac/ReadStat\" -DPACKAGE=\"readstat\" -DVERSION=\"1.1.9\" -DHAVE_STDIO_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DLT_OBJDIR=\".libs/\" -DHAVE_ICONV=1 -DICONV_CONST= -I. -g -Wall -Werror -pedantic-errors -std=c99 -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -c src/spss/readstat_por_write.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o src/spss/.libs/libreadstat_la-readstat_por_write.o
src/spss/readstat_por_write.c: In function 'por_emit_header':
src/spss/readstat_por_write.c:206:5: error: 'strncpy' output may be truncated copying 20 bytes from a string of length 256 [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
  206 |     strncpy(vanity[1] + 20, writer->file_label, 20);
      |     ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Answer: This snippet shows the error which caused the build to fail. The error comes from the gcc command.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/twisted/trial/runner.py", line 711, in loadByName
    return self.suiteFactory([self.findByName(name, recurse=recurse)])
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/twisted/trial/runner.py", line 474, in findByName
    obj = reflect.namedModule(searchName)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/twisted/python/reflect.py", line 156, in namedModule
    topLevel = __import__(name)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/synapse-1.115.0/tests/api/test_auth.py", line 39, in <module>
    from synapse.server import HomeServer
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/synapse/server.py", line 55, in <module>
    from synapse.federation.federation_client import FederationClient
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/synapse/federation/federation_client.py", line 72, in <module>
    from synapse.federation.transport.client import SendJoinResponse
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/synapse/federation/transport/client.py", line 55, in <module>
    from synapse.http.matrixfederationclient import ByteParser, LegacyJsonSendParser
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/synapse/http/matrixfederationclient.py", line 22, in <module>
    import cgi
builtins.ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cgi']: [The first exception thrown while running tests.]


Answer: Issue: The used module 'cgi' could not be imported, because it was removed in Python 3.13.
Resolution: Report the issue or submit a merge request upstream.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/twisted/trial/runner.py", line 711, in loadByName
    return self.suiteFactory([self.findByName(name, recurse=recurse)])
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/twisted/trial/runner.py", line 474, in findByName
    obj = reflect.namedModule(searchName)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/twisted/python/reflect.py", line 156, in namedModule
    topLevel = __import__(name)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/synapse-1.115.0/tests/api/test_auth.py", line 39, in <module>
    from synapse.server import HomeServer
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/synapse/server.py", line 55, in <module>
    from synapse.federation.federation_client import FederationClient
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/synapse/federation/federation_client.py", line 72, in <module>
    from synapse.federation.transport.client import SendJoinResponse
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/synapse/federation/transport/client.py", line 55, in <module>
    from synapse.http.matrixfederationclient import ByteParser, LegacyJsonSendParser
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/matrix-synapse-1.115.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/synapse/http/matrixfederationclient.py", line 22, in <module>
    import cgi
builtins.ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cgi'

Answer: The first exception thrown while running tests.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /home/vmihalko/fedora/file/file-5.47-stack-overrun.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/readelf.c.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8mWaiR (%prep)]: [This snippet indicates that the build failed because a hunk from the patch was rejected.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because hunk patching `src/readlf.c` failed to apply.
Resolution: Please check the patch to determine why the hunks failed to apply.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /home/vmihalko/fedora/file/file-5.47-stack-overrun.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/readelf.c.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8mWaiR (%prep)

Answer: This snippet indicates that the build failed because a hunk from the patch was rejected.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
  - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch from copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_1]: [DNF reporting that `nim-srpm-macros` is not installable.]


Answer: Issue: redhat-rpm-config package depending on non-existing nim-srpm-macros couldn't be installed.
Resolution: redhat-rpm-config is a "core" needed by all RPM builds, therefore either the package needs to stop depending on nim-srpm-macros, or the nim-srpm-macros need to appear in repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

  - nothing provides nim-srpm-macros needed by redhat-rpm-config-178-1.fc34.noarch from copr_xxmitsu_llvm_priority_1

Answer: DNF reporting that `nim-srpm-macros` is not installable.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: gpgverify >= 2]: [It lists the dependency package that was not found in the repository.]


Answer: Issue: A build-time dependency (gpgverify >= 2) specified in the spec file does not exist in the Fedora repository.
Resolution: Either make sure that the specified version of the gpgverify package exists in the Fedora repository, use the version that is present, or replace/remove the dependency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: gpgverify >= 2

Answer: It lists the dependency package that was not found in the repository.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [go: go.mod requires go >= 1.24.0 (running go 1.23.8; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)]: [This is a go error message which specifies that an insufficiently low version of go was used (1.23.8 instead of 1.24.0 or greater).]


Answer: Issue: The go version was too low (1.23.8 instead of 1.24.0 or greater) to build this source code.
Resolution: Run this build in an environment with a newer go version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.24.0 (running go 1.23.8; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)

Answer: This is a go error message which specifies that an insufficiently low version of go was used (1.23.8 instead of 1.24.0 or greater).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<U[S-ASCII]> but was:<U[TF-8]>]: [there is a mismatch between expected and actual character encoding]
=============
[[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:3.2.2:test ]: [indicates that build failed due to test failures reported by maven surefire plugin]


Answer: Issue: the build failed due to test failures that are about incorrect character encoding set
Resolution: ensure that correct LC_ALL and LANG are set during build
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<U[S-ASCII]> but was:<U[TF-8]>

Answer: there is a mismatch between expected and actual character encoding
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:3.2.2:test 

Answer: indicates that build failed due to test failures reported by maven surefire plugin
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/libexec/gpgverify --keyring=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper.keyring --signature=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc --data=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz
gpgv: Signature made Tue May  6 08:09:40 2025 UTC
gpgv:                using RSA key FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
gpgv: BAD signature from "Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com>"
gpgverify: Signature verification failed.]: [Verification of the gpg signature of the of the sources failed.]


Answer: Issue: There was incorrect source tarball uploaded, which failed the gpg verification.
Resolution: Upload the correct signed upstream source tarball to pass the gpgverify step
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/libexec/gpgverify --keyring=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper.keyring --signature=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc --data=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz
gpgv: Signature made Tue May  6 08:09:40 2025 UTC
gpgv:                using RSA key FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
gpgv: BAD signature from "Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com>"
gpgverify: Signature verification failed.

Answer: Verification of the gpg signature of the of the sources failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to download metadata (metalink: "https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=s390x") for repository "fedora"]: [dnf failed to download repository metadata]


Answer: Issue: Build failed during dependency installation due to dnf failure. Possibly broken network.
Resolution: These kinds of problems are usually fixed by rebuilding.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to download metadata (metalink: "https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=s390x") for repository "fedora"

Answer: dnf failed to download repository metadata
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 10:16:47 ] :: [   INFO   ] :: rlSESearchRule: checking rule 'allow zebra_t NetworkManager_t : file { getattr open read } [ ]'
FILTERED RULES
zebra_t is not a valid type attribute
:: [ 10:16:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] ::   check permission 'getattr' is present (Assert: '1' should equal '0')
:: [ 10:16:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] ::   check permission 'open' is present (Assert: '1' should equal '0')
:: [ 10:16:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] ::   check permission 'read' is present (Assert: '1' should equal '0')
]: [Checking of PROC_TYPE failed.]


Answer: Issue: Test failed because zebra_t is not the correct PROC_TYPE set by selinux. 
Resolution: Use "frr_t" PROC_TYPE instead of "zebra_t".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 10:16:47 ] :: [   INFO   ] :: rlSESearchRule: checking rule 'allow zebra_t NetworkManager_t : file { getattr open read } [ ]'
FILTERED RULES
zebra_t is not a valid type attribute
:: [ 10:16:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] ::   check permission 'getattr' is present (Assert: '1' should equal '0')
:: [ 10:16:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] ::   check permission 'open' is present (Assert: '1' should equal '0')
:: [ 10:16:47 ] :: [   FAIL   ] ::   check permission 'read' is present (Assert: '1' should equal '0')


Answer: Checking of PROC_TYPE failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/fix-build-with-icu-75+.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file CMakeLists.txt.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JUuNow (%prep)]: [It shows the reason why the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the patch in the prep phase of the build couldn't be applied due to  update of the source upstream tarball to later version.
Resolution: Either update the patch to be cleanly appliable to new upstream tarball version, or remove the patch in case it is not needed any more.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress /builddir/build/SOURCES/fix-build-with-icu-75+.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file CMakeLists.txt.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JUuNow (%prep)

Answer: It shows the reason why the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [mysql-test-run: *** ERROR: there were failing test cases
]: [mysql-test-run return non-zero exit code when any test failed]
=============
[Failing test(s): main.func_regexp_pcre
]: [Describes which tests failed]
=============
[Completed: Failed 2/1057 tests, 99.81% were successful.
]: [Describes how many tests failed]
=============
[[ fail ]]: [marks failed test]
=============
[CURRENT_TEST: main.func_regexp_pcre
--- /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/main/func_regexp_pcre.result	2025-01-30 11:01:23.000000000 +0000
+++ /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/main/func_regexp_pcre.reject	2025-04-04 10:04:14.944071169 +0000
@@ -169,13 +169,13 @@
 \p{Latin}	ã	0
 \p{Latin}	ê°·	0
 \p{Ll}	1	0
-\p{Ll}	A	0
+\p{Ll}	A	1
 \p{Ll}	a	1
-\p{Ll}	Ã	0
+\p{Ll}	Ã	1
 \p{Ll}	Ã 	1
-\p{Ll}	Î£	0
+\p{Ll}	Î£	1
 \p{Ll}	Ï	1
-\p{Ll}	Ð¯	0
+\p{Ll}	Ð¯	1
 \p{Ll}	Ñ	1
 \p{Ll}	à¯¨	0
 \p{Ll}	à¶´	0
@@ -183,13 +183,13 @@
 \p{Ll}	ê°·	0
 \p{Lu}	1	0
 \p{Lu}	A	1
-\p{Lu}	a	0
+\p{Lu}	a	1
 \p{Lu}	Ã	1
-\p{Lu}	Ã 	0
+\p{Lu}	Ã 	1
 \p{Lu}	Î£	1
-\p{Lu}	Ï	0
+\p{Lu}	Ï	1
 \p{Lu}	Ð¯	1
-\p{Lu}	Ñ	0
+\p{Lu}	Ñ	1
 \p{Lu}	à¯¨	0
 \p{Lu}	à¶´	0
 \p{Lu}	ã	0

Result content mismatch

 - saving '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/var/1/log/main.func_regexp_pcre/' to '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/var/log/main.func_regexp_pcre/'
]: [Failed test output]


Answer: Issue: A tests from the testsuite failed
Resolution: Investigate the failed test cause.
It is possible to disable a specific test in the skipped-tests-list* files
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
mysql-test-run: *** ERROR: there were failing test cases


Answer: mysql-test-run return non-zero exit code when any test failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failing test(s): main.func_regexp_pcre


Answer: Describes which tests failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Completed: Failed 2/1057 tests, 99.81% were successful.


Answer: Describes how many tests failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ fail ]

Answer: marks failed test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CURRENT_TEST: main.func_regexp_pcre
--- /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/main/func_regexp_pcre.result	2025-01-30 11:01:23.000000000 +0000
+++ /builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/main/func_regexp_pcre.reject	2025-04-04 10:04:14.944071169 +0000
@@ -169,13 +169,13 @@
 \p{Latin}	ã	0
 \p{Latin}	ê°·	0
 \p{Ll}	1	0
-\p{Ll}	A	0
+\p{Ll}	A	1
 \p{Ll}	a	1
-\p{Ll}	Ã	0
+\p{Ll}	Ã	1
 \p{Ll}	Ã 	1
-\p{Ll}	Î£	0
+\p{Ll}	Î£	1
 \p{Ll}	Ï	1
-\p{Ll}	Ð¯	0
+\p{Ll}	Ð¯	1
 \p{Ll}	Ñ	1
 \p{Ll}	à¯¨	0
 \p{Ll}	à¶´	0
@@ -183,13 +183,13 @@
 \p{Ll}	ê°·	0
 \p{Lu}	1	0
 \p{Lu}	A	1
-\p{Lu}	a	0
+\p{Lu}	a	1
 \p{Lu}	Ã	1
-\p{Lu}	Ã 	0
+\p{Lu}	Ã 	1
 \p{Lu}	Î£	1
-\p{Lu}	Ï	0
+\p{Lu}	Ï	1
 \p{Lu}	Ð¯	1
-\p{Lu}	Ñ	0
+\p{Lu}	Ñ	1
 \p{Lu}	à¯¨	0
 \p{Lu}	à¶´	0
 \p{Lu}	ã	0

Result content mismatch

 - saving '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/var/1/log/main.func_regexp_pcre/' to '/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/mysql-test/var/log/main.func_regexp_pcre/'


Answer: Failed test output
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testexternalinspection.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testexternalinspection.cpython-313d-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testexternalinspection.cpython-313t-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testexternalinspection.cpython-313td-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testlimitedcapi.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testlimitedcapi.cpython-313d-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testlimitedcapi.cpython-313t-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testlimitedcapi.cpython-313td-x86_64-linux-gnu.so]: [There are installed but unpackaged files. This makes the build fail.]


Answer: Issue: New installed files were added upstream, but the %files section did not list them.
Resolution: List newly added files in the %files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testexternalinspection.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testexternalinspection.cpython-313d-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testexternalinspection.cpython-313t-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testexternalinspection.cpython-313td-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testlimitedcapi.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testlimitedcapi.cpython-313d-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testlimitedcapi.cpython-313t-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
   /usr/lib64/python3.13/lib-dynload/_testlimitedcapi.cpython-313td-x86_64-linux-gnu.so

Answer: There are installed but unpackaged files. This makes the build fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': ("Opening input file" "No such file or directory" "/builddir/build/BUILD/erlang-26.2.5.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/erlang/erlang-flymake.el")]: [The error message with dependency token.]


Answer: Issue: Dependency token should be alpha-numeric.
Resolution: Rename dependency token.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': ("Opening input file" "No such file or directory" "/builddir/build/BUILD/erlang-26.2.5.11-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/erlang/erlang-flymake.el")

Answer: The error message with dependency token.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'epel':
  - Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed6)
  - Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'epel': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7)]: [DNF is not able to download repository metadata for "epel" repository. This repository server returns error code 404 (not found).]
=============
[WARNING: DNF4 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
]: [DNF transaction has failed and it will retry after 10 seconds. ]


Answer: Issue: The 'epel' repository is required for the build but it can't be reached.
Resolution: Make sure the 'epel' repository is accessible. You can raise this issue to maintainers of the repository.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'epel':
  - Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed6)
  - Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'epel': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Status code: 404 for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-&arch=x86_64 (IP: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7)

Answer: DNF is not able to download repository metadata for "epel" repository. This repository server returns error code 404 (not found).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
WARNING: DNF4 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s


Answer: DNF transaction has failed and it will retry after 10 seconds.