fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/COPYING
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/about.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/arch_dependencies.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/autosetup.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/boolean_dependencies.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/buildprocess.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/conditionalbuilds.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/dependencies.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/dependency_generators.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/devel_documentation.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/dynamic_specs.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/file_triggers.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/format_v3.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/format_v4.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/index.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/large_files.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/lua.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/macros.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/more_dependencies.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/philosophy.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/plugins.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/queryformat.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/relocatable.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/scriptlet_expansion.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/signatures_digests.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/spec.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/tags.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/triggers.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/tsort.md]: [The list of unpackaged files.]


Answer: Issue: Couple of files were installed during the %install section but they are not listed in the %files section of the respective (sub-)package.
Resolution: List all files which are expected to be packaged in the %files section of the respective (sub-)package.  If those files should not be packaged, remove them from the %buildroot.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/COPYING
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/about.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/arch_dependencies.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/autosetup.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/boolean_dependencies.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/buildprocess.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/conditionalbuilds.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/dependencies.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/dependency_generators.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/devel_documentation.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/dynamic_specs.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/file_triggers.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/format_v3.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/format_v4.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/index.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/large_files.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/lua.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/macros.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/more_dependencies.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/philosophy.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/plugins.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/queryformat.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/relocatable.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/scriptlet_expansion.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/signatures_digests.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/spec.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/tags.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/triggers.md
   /usr/share/doc/rpm/tsort.md

Answer: The list of unpackaged files.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [  - nothing provides golang(github.com/docker/docker/client) needed by golang-github-migrate-4-devel-4.17.1-4.fc42.noarch from fedora
]: [missing golang package dependency]
=============
[  - nothing provides golang(github.com/docker/docker/api/types) needed by golang-github-migrate-4-devel-4.17.1-4.fc42.noarch from fedora
]: [another missing golang dependency in the repo]
=============
[  - nothing provides golang(github.com/docker/docker/api/types/container) needed by golang-github-migrate-4-devel-4.17.1-4.fc42.noarch from fedora
]: [another dependency that's not packages]
=============
[  - nothing provides golang(github.com/docker/docker/api/types/network) needed by golang-github-migrate-4-devel-4.17.1-4.fc42.noarch from fedora
]: [final unpackaged golang dependency]


Answer: Issue: There are unpackaged Go dependencies that are needed for the RPM build
Resolution: Package the missing dependencies
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  - nothing provides golang(github.com/docker/docker/client) needed by golang-github-migrate-4-devel-4.17.1-4.fc42.noarch from fedora


Answer: missing golang package dependency
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  - nothing provides golang(github.com/docker/docker/api/types) needed by golang-github-migrate-4-devel-4.17.1-4.fc42.noarch from fedora


Answer: another missing golang dependency in the repo
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  - nothing provides golang(github.com/docker/docker/api/types/container) needed by golang-github-migrate-4-devel-4.17.1-4.fc42.noarch from fedora


Answer: another dependency that's not packages
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  - nothing provides golang(github.com/docker/docker/api/types/network) needed by golang-github-migrate-4-devel-4.17.1-4.fc42.noarch from fedora


Answer: final unpackaged golang dependency
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [t/local/31_rsa_generate_key.t ............... ok

#   Failed test 'X509V3_EXT_print nid=103	extended-cert.cert.pem:4'
#   at t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t line 273.
#          got: 'Full Name:
#   URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example/crl1.crl
# 
# Full Name:
#   URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example/crl2.crl
# '
#     expected: 'Full Name:
#   URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example/crl1.crl
# Full Name:
#   URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example/crl2.crl'

#   Failed test 'X509V3_EXT_print nid=86	extended-cert.cert.pem:6'
#   at t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t line 273.
#          got: 'email:intermediate-ca@net-ssleay.example, URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example, DNS:intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example, Registered ID:1.2.0.0, IP Address:192.168.0.1, IP Address:FD25:F814:AFB5:9873:0:0:0:1, othername: emailAddress:ica@net-ssleay.example'
#     expected: 'email:intermediate-ca@net-ssleay.example, URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example, DNS:intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example, Registered ID:1.2.0.0, IP Address:192.168.0.1, IP Address:FD25:F814:AFB5:9873:0:0:0:1, othername: emailAddress::ica@net-ssleay.example'

#   Failed test 'X509V3_EXT_print nid=85	extended-cert.cert.pem:8'
#   at t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t line 273.
#          got: 'email:john.doe@net-ssleay.example, URI:http://johndoe.net-ssleay.example, DNS:johndoe.net-ssleay.example, Registered ID:1.2.3.4, IP Address:192.168.0.2, IP Address:FD25:F814:AFB5:9873:0:0:0:2, othername: emailAddress:jd@net-ssleay.example'
#     expected: 'email:john.doe@net-ssleay.example, URI:http://johndoe.net-ssleay.example, DNS:johndoe.net-ssleay.example, Registered ID:1.2.3.4, IP Address:192.168.0.2, IP Address:FD25:F814:AFB5:9873:0:0:0:2, othername: emailAddress::jd@net-ssleay.example'
# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 746.
t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t ............. 
Dubious, test returned 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
Failed 3/746 subtests ]: [The test failed because output format changed.]


Answer: Issue: The failure was caused by new OpenSSL 3.5.0. 
OpenSSL 3.4.0 changed the output format slightly.
Resolution: Code has to be update tho properly handle updated output format.

There is the solution for this case:
https://github.com/radiator-software/p5-net-ssleay/pull/520
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
t/local/31_rsa_generate_key.t ............... ok

#   Failed test 'X509V3_EXT_print nid=103	extended-cert.cert.pem:4'
#   at t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t line 273.
#          got: 'Full Name:
#   URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example/crl1.crl
# 
# Full Name:
#   URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example/crl2.crl
# '
#     expected: 'Full Name:
#   URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example/crl1.crl
# Full Name:
#   URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example/crl2.crl'

#   Failed test 'X509V3_EXT_print nid=86	extended-cert.cert.pem:6'
#   at t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t line 273.
#          got: 'email:intermediate-ca@net-ssleay.example, URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example, DNS:intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example, Registered ID:1.2.0.0, IP Address:192.168.0.1, IP Address:FD25:F814:AFB5:9873:0:0:0:1, othername: emailAddress:ica@net-ssleay.example'
#     expected: 'email:intermediate-ca@net-ssleay.example, URI:http://intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example, DNS:intermediate-ca.net-ssleay.example, Registered ID:1.2.0.0, IP Address:192.168.0.1, IP Address:FD25:F814:AFB5:9873:0:0:0:1, othername: emailAddress::ica@net-ssleay.example'

#   Failed test 'X509V3_EXT_print nid=85	extended-cert.cert.pem:8'
#   at t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t line 273.
#          got: 'email:john.doe@net-ssleay.example, URI:http://johndoe.net-ssleay.example, DNS:johndoe.net-ssleay.example, Registered ID:1.2.3.4, IP Address:192.168.0.2, IP Address:FD25:F814:AFB5:9873:0:0:0:2, othername: emailAddress:jd@net-ssleay.example'
#     expected: 'email:john.doe@net-ssleay.example, URI:http://johndoe.net-ssleay.example, DNS:johndoe.net-ssleay.example, Registered ID:1.2.3.4, IP Address:192.168.0.2, IP Address:FD25:F814:AFB5:9873:0:0:0:2, othername: emailAddress::jd@net-ssleay.example'
# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 746.
t/local/32_x509_get_cert_info.t ............. 
Dubious, test returned 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
Failed 3/746 subtests 

Answer: The test failed because output format changed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M e659f0f84adb4d03b17fe8cd79168ba2 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1749000039.689858/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.aiuqsvlp:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/libsolv.spec']: [Its shows the high level command that failed.]
=============
[error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/man/man1/apk2solv.1.gz
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/man/man1/apk2solv.1.gz]: [It shows the root cause of why the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: It failed because when the package was installed it placed a file in /usr/share/man/man1/apk2solv.1.gz but that file is not packaged.
Resolution: Either change the build not to install the file or add it to the spec file to track it.
It depends on the maintainer what is the appropriate fix.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M e659f0f84adb4d03b17fe8cd79168ba2 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1749000039.689858/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.aiuqsvlp:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/libsolv.spec'

Answer: Its shows the high level command that failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/man/man1/apk2solv.1.gz
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/man/man1/apk2solv.1.gz

Answer: It shows the root cause of why the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file res/linux/org.mixxx.Mixxx.desktop.rej]: [Patch application failed.]


Answer: Issue: Prepare step failed because of failed patch application.
Resolution: Attempt to apply the patch manually. Inspect changes to patched files and rewrite the patch so that it is applicable to current files.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file res/linux/org.mixxx.Mixxx.desktop.rej

Answer: Patch application failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CC=clang]: [The default C compiler is clang.]
=============
[CXX=clang++]: [The default C++ compiler is clang.]
=============
[gcc -c  -I. -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fwrapv -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg -fstack-protector-strong   -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer   -DVERSION=\"1.19\" -DXS_VERSION=\"1.19\" -fPIC "-I/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE"   cxsa_hash_table.c
]: [Package tries to build with gcc.]
=============
[gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ
]: [This is the error message.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed, because the RPM spec file set clang as the default compiler, but the package has hard-coded the compiler as gcc and it is trying to use clang C options which gcc doesn't support.
Resolution: Fix the upstream source to not hard-code gcc as the compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CC=clang

Answer: The default C compiler is clang.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CXX=clang++

Answer: The default C++ compiler is clang.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc -c  -I. -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fwrapv -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg -fstack-protector-strong   -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer   -DVERSION=\"1.19\" -DXS_VERSION=\"1.19\" -fPIC "-I/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE"   cxsa_hash_table.c


Answer: Package tries to build with gcc.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfgâ


Answer: This is the error message.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [==================================== ERRORS ====================================
_______________ ERROR collecting tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py _______________
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/test.py:39: in __init__
    boxes = [s.name for s in self.vagrant.status()]
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:531: in status
    return self._parse_status(output)
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:579: in _parse_status
    info = {kind: data for timestamp, _, kind, data in tuples}
E   ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 4)
_______________ ERROR collecting tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py _______________
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/test.py:39: in __init__
    boxes = [s.name for s in self.vagrant.status()]
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:531: in status
    return self._parse_status(output)
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:579: in _parse_status
    info = {kind: data for timestamp, _, kind, data in tuples}
E   ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 4)
_______________ ERROR collecting tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py _______________
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/test.py:39: in __init__
    boxes = [s.name for s in self.vagrant.status()]
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:531: in status
    return self._parse_status(output)
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:579: in _parse_status
    info = {kind: data for timestamp, _, kind, data in tuples}
E   ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 4)
=========================== short test summary info ============================
ERROR tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py::VagrantTestCase - ValueError: too many...
ERROR tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py::AllMultiBoxesTests - ValueError: too m...
ERROR tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py::SingleBoxTests - ValueError: too many ...
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 3 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
============================== 3 errors in 4.29s ===============================]: [There are errors within the testsuite]


Answer: Issue: The tests failed in the %check phase
Resolution: The maintainer should check the failures in the testsuite and resolve them
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
==================================== ERRORS ====================================
_______________ ERROR collecting tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py _______________
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/test.py:39: in __init__
    boxes = [s.name for s in self.vagrant.status()]
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:531: in status
    return self._parse_status(output)
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:579: in _parse_status
    info = {kind: data for timestamp, _, kind, data in tuples}
E   ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 4)
_______________ ERROR collecting tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py _______________
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/test.py:39: in __init__
    boxes = [s.name for s in self.vagrant.status()]
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:531: in status
    return self._parse_status(output)
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:579: in _parse_status
    info = {kind: data for timestamp, _, kind, data in tuples}
E   ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 4)
_______________ ERROR collecting tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py _______________
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/test.py:39: in __init__
    boxes = [s.name for s in self.vagrant.status()]
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:531: in status
    return self._parse_status(output)
../BUILDROOT/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/vagrant/__init__.py:579: in _parse_status
    info = {kind: data for timestamp, _, kind, data in tuples}
E   ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 4)
=========================== short test summary info ============================
ERROR tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py::VagrantTestCase - ValueError: too many...
ERROR tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py::AllMultiBoxesTests - ValueError: too m...
ERROR tests/test_vagrant_test_case.py::SingleBoxTests - ValueError: too many ...
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 3 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
============================== 3 errors in 4.29s ===============================

Answer: There are errors within the testsuite
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: The prebuilt `sys.rs` may not be compatible with your target,
       please use bindgen feature to generate new `sys.rs` of your arch
       or use `--cfg=io_uring_skip_arch_check` to skip the check.
  --> /builddir/build/BUILD/cosmic-edit-1.0.0_alpha.7-build/cosmic-edit-epoch-1.0.0-alpha.7/vendor/io-uring/src/sys/mod.rs:23:1
   |
23 | / compile_error!(
24 | |     "The prebuilt `sys.rs` may not be compatible with your target,
25 | | please use bindgen feature to generate new `sys.rs` of your arch
26 | | or use `--cfg=io_uring_skip_arch_check` to skip the check."
27 | | );
   | |_^]: [This snippet shows why the build has failed]


Answer: Issue: The prebuilt sys.rs doesn't match the system architecture, so the build is blocked for the safety.
Resolution: There are two options how to fix the issue. Enable the bindgen feature. Or add the build flags that disable the arch check: `%global build_rustflags %{?build_rustflags} --cfg=io_uring_skip_arÍch_check`
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: The prebuilt `sys.rs` may not be compatible with your target,
       please use bindgen feature to generate new `sys.rs` of your arch
       or use `--cfg=io_uring_skip_arch_check` to skip the check.
  --> /builddir/build/BUILD/cosmic-edit-1.0.0_alpha.7-build/cosmic-edit-epoch-1.0.0-alpha.7/vendor/io-uring/src/sys/mod.rs:23:1
   |
23 | / compile_error!(
24 | |     "The prebuilt `sys.rs` may not be compatible with your target,
25 | | please use bindgen feature to generate new `sys.rs` of your arch
26 | | or use `--cfg=io_uring_skip_arch_check` to skip the check."
27 | | );
   | |_^

Answer: This snippet shows why the build has failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                               ]: [Requested packages are not available.]
=============
[Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [Package manager can not satisfy requirements.]
=============
[
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 1]: [Third attempt of dependency installation initiated.]


Answer: Issue: Required packages are not available in installed repositories.
Resolution: Ensure all required packages are available in installed repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                               

Answer: Requested packages are not available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: Package manager can not satisfy requirements.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 1

Answer: Third attempt of dependency installation initiated.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar]: [It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) package.  
]


Answer: Issue: Some of the required packages were not installed.

Resolution: Resolve the conflict first.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

  file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar

Answer: It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [ImportError: cannot import name 'RequestRate' from 'pyrate_limiter' (/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyrate_limiter/__init__.py)]: [The relevant error message saying that `RequestRate` cannot be imported from `pyrate_limiter` package.]


Answer: Issue: This is a python package trying to import `RequestRate` from the `pyrate_limiter` package. However, in version 3, the `RequestRate` was renamed to just `Rate`. 
Resolution: There are several possible solutions:

- Package a newer upstream version which fixes this bug
- Explicitly depend on an older version of the `python3-pyrate-limiter` package
- Add a patch to your package, changing the name of the imported class
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ImportError: cannot import name 'RequestRate' from 'pyrate_limiter' (/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyrate_limiter/__init__.py)

Answer: The relevant error message saying that `RequestRate` cannot be imported from `pyrate_limiter` package.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E7U0xO
]: [This indicates that rpmbuild started %check section of SPEC file.]
=============
[+ /usr/bin/pytest -vv -k 'not test_tilde_user'
============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.13.0b1, pytest-7.4.3, pluggy-1.3.0 -- /usr/bin/python3
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/wcmatch-8.4.1
configfile: tox.ini
collecting ... collected 1316 items / 1 deselected / 1315 selected

tests/test_fnmatch.py::TestFnMatch::test_cases[case0] PASSED             [  0%]
]: [This indicated that %check section started pytest to run unit tests for a package.]
=============
[tests/test_pathlib.py::TestComparisons::test_pure_equal FAILED           [ 96%]
]: [This indicates that test TestComparisons::test_pure_equal failed.]
=============
[=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_______________________ TestComparisons.test_pure_equal ________________________

self = <tests.test_pathlib.TestComparisons testMethod=test_pure_equal>

    def test_pure_equal(self):
        """Test equivalence."""
    
        p1 = pathlib.PureWindowsPath('wcmatch')
        p2 = pathlib.PurePosixPath('wcmatch')
    
        p3 = pypathlib.PureWindowsPath('wcmatch')
        p4 = pypathlib.PurePosixPath('wcmatch')
    
>       self.assertTrue(p1 != p2)
E       AssertionError: False is not true

tests/test_pathlib.py:312: AssertionError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_pathlib.py::TestComparisons::test_pure_equal - AssertionErr...
========== 1 failed, 1163 passed, 151 skipped, 1 deselected in 1.60s ===========

RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E7U0xO (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E7U0xO (%check)
]: [Here are the details of the failed tests. ]


Answer: Issue: The build fails because of the failed test suite.
The problem is that Windows path for wcmatch and Posix path or wcmatch does not differ while the test claims it should be different. 
Resolution: You should investigate the reason of the failure of unit test suite and work with upstream on fixing these tests.

As a quick workaround you may disable the tests. Either by commenting %check section or disabling the specific test using `%pytest -k "not test_pure_equal"`. But be aware that building package with failing test suite can lead to broken software.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E7U0xO


Answer: This indicates that rpmbuild started %check section of SPEC file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/pytest -vv -k 'not test_tilde_user'
============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.13.0b1, pytest-7.4.3, pluggy-1.3.0 -- /usr/bin/python3
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/wcmatch-8.4.1
configfile: tox.ini
collecting ... collected 1316 items / 1 deselected / 1315 selected

tests/test_fnmatch.py::TestFnMatch::test_cases[case0] PASSED             [  0%]


Answer: This indicated that %check section started pytest to run unit tests for a package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
tests/test_pathlib.py::TestComparisons::test_pure_equal FAILED           [ 96%]


Answer: This indicates that test TestComparisons::test_pure_equal failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_______________________ TestComparisons.test_pure_equal ________________________

self = <tests.test_pathlib.TestComparisons testMethod=test_pure_equal>

    def test_pure_equal(self):
        """Test equivalence."""
    
        p1 = pathlib.PureWindowsPath('wcmatch')
        p2 = pathlib.PurePosixPath('wcmatch')
    
        p3 = pypathlib.PureWindowsPath('wcmatch')
        p4 = pypathlib.PurePosixPath('wcmatch')
    
>       self.assertTrue(p1 != p2)
E       AssertionError: False is not true

tests/test_pathlib.py:312: AssertionError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_pathlib.py::TestComparisons::test_pure_equal - AssertionErr...
========== 1 failed, 1163 passed, 151 skipped, 1 deselected in 1.60s ===========

RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E7U0xO (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E7U0xO (%check)


Answer: Here are the details of the failed tests.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build warnings:
    %source_date_epoch_from_changelog is set, but %changelog has no entries to take a date from
    absolute symlink: /usr/bin/android-studio -> /usr/share/android-studio/bin/studio]: [Cumulative warnings from RPM build process. These shouldn't cause the build the fail.]
=============
[stderr:
Sub-command failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/copr-repo", line 445, in main
    main_try_lock(opts, batch)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-repo", line 397, in main_try_lock
    main_locked(opts, batch, opts.log)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-repo", line 359, in main_locked
    add_appdata(opts)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-repo", line 242, in add_appdata
    run_cmd([
    ~~~~~~~^^
        "/usr/bin/timeout", "--kill-after=240", "180",
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ...<10 lines>...
        "--origin=" + origin],
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        check=True, logger=opts.log)
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/copr_backend/helpers.py", line 148, in run_cmd
    raise CommandException(exc_msg)
copr_backend.helpers.CommandException: Command '/usr/bin/timeout --kill-after=240 180 /usr/bin/appstream-builder --temp-dir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/medzik/jetbrains/fedora-42-x86_64/tmp --cache-dir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/medzik/jetbrains/fedora-42-x86_64/cache --packages-dir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/medzik/jetbrains/fedora-42-x86_64 --output-dir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/medzik/jetbrains/fedora-42-x86_64/appdata --basename=appstream --include-failed --min-icon-size=48 --veto-ignore=missing-parents --enable-hidpi --origin=medzik/jetbrains' failed, exit code '124

]: [Stack trace of exception encountered during command execution.]
=============
[[2025-06-26 10:50:27,047][ ERROR][PID:2437819] Createrepo failed
]: [Error was encountered by the Createrepo.]
=============
[RPM build warnings:
    %source_date_epoch_from_changelog is set, but %changelog has no entries to take a date from
]: [RPM build warning about lack of any entries n %changelog macro. This means that %source_date_epoch_from_changelog can not function properly.]


Answer: Issue: Backend process `createrepo` has failed, this in turn caused the build failure.
Resolution: The error was encountered while waiting for a process to complete. It is possible that there is a problem with latency on your network, or the `createrepo` itself may have a problem handling response.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build warnings:
    %source_date_epoch_from_changelog is set, but %changelog has no entries to take a date from
    absolute symlink: /usr/bin/android-studio -> /usr/share/android-studio/bin/studio

Answer: Cumulative warnings from RPM build process. These shouldn't cause the build the fail.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
stderr:
Sub-command failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/copr-repo", line 445, in main
    main_try_lock(opts, batch)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-repo", line 397, in main_try_lock
    main_locked(opts, batch, opts.log)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-repo", line 359, in main_locked
    add_appdata(opts)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^
  File "/usr/bin/copr-repo", line 242, in add_appdata
    run_cmd([
    ~~~~~~~^^
        "/usr/bin/timeout", "--kill-after=240", "180",
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ...<10 lines>...
        "--origin=" + origin],
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        check=True, logger=opts.log)
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/copr_backend/helpers.py", line 148, in run_cmd
    raise CommandException(exc_msg)
copr_backend.helpers.CommandException: Command '/usr/bin/timeout --kill-after=240 180 /usr/bin/appstream-builder --temp-dir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/medzik/jetbrains/fedora-42-x86_64/tmp --cache-dir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/medzik/jetbrains/fedora-42-x86_64/cache --packages-dir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/medzik/jetbrains/fedora-42-x86_64 --output-dir=/var/lib/copr/public_html/results/medzik/jetbrains/fedora-42-x86_64/appdata --basename=appstream --include-failed --min-icon-size=48 --veto-ignore=missing-parents --enable-hidpi --origin=medzik/jetbrains' failed, exit code '124



Answer: Stack trace of exception encountered during command execution.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[2025-06-26 10:50:27,047][ ERROR][PID:2437819] Createrepo failed


Answer: Error was encountered by the Createrepo.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build warnings:
    %source_date_epoch_from_changelog is set, but %changelog has no entries to take a date from


Answer: RPM build warning about lack of any entries n %changelog macro. This means that %source_date_epoch_from_changelog can not function properly.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/libexec/gpgverify --keyring=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper.keyring --signature=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc --data=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz
gpgv: Signature made Tue May  6 08:09:40 2025 UTC
gpgv:                using RSA key FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
gpgv: BAD signature from "Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com>"
gpgverify: Signature verification failed.
]: [The build fails early due a failed signature verification of the source archive.]


Answer: Issue: The signature of the source archive can't be verified using the key defined in the spec file. Perhaps the source archive hasn't been signed at all.
Resolution: Check whether the build does use the right source archive. Reach to upstream asking them to provide a properly signed source archive.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/libexec/gpgverify --keyring=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper.keyring --signature=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz.asc --data=/builddir/build/SOURCES/socket_wrapper-1.5.0.tar.gz
gpgv: Signature made Tue May  6 08:09:40 2025 UTC
gpgv:                using RSA key FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
gpgv: BAD signature from "Copr Team <copr-team@redhat.com>"
gpgverify: Signature verification failed.


Answer: The build fails early due a failed signature verification of the source archive.