fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: pkgconfig(librepo) >= 1.20.0]: [This is the reason the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: The package has a dependency on pkgconfig(librepo) >= 1.20.0 which cannot be satisfied.
Resolution: Either make sure the dependency is available, or do not require it in this package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: pkgconfig(librepo) >= 1.20.0

Answer: This is the reason the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/common.sh: line 107: mysql_upgrade: command not found
]: [Command failed, because it is missing an utility it requires: 'mysql_upgrade']
=============
[/usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/common.sh: line 107: mysql_upgrade: command not found
]: [Command failed, because it is missing an utility it requires: 'mysql_upgrade']
=============
[/usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/common.sh: line 107: mysql_upgrade: command not found
]: [Command failed, because it is missing an utility it requires: 'mysql_upgrade']
=============
[/usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/common.sh: line 107: mysql_upgrade: command not found
]: [Command failed, because it is missing an utility it requires: 'mysql_upgrade']
=============
[/usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/common.sh: line 107: mysql_upgrade: command not found
]: [Command failed, because it is missing an utility it requires: 'mysql_upgrade']
=============
[Test for image 'quay.io/fedora/mariadb-1011:10.11' FAILED (exit code: 1)
]: [Information that it is the tests of the container image that failed]


Answer: Issue: The tests of the container image failed, because it requires an utility that is not present.
Resolution: Find out why the utility is missing.
Maybe a package dependency change? Was the utility moved to a different package or sub-package?
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/common.sh: line 107: mysql_upgrade: command not found


Answer: Command failed, because it is missing an utility it requires: 'mysql_upgrade'
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Test for image 'quay.io/fedora/mariadb-1011:10.11' FAILED (exit code: 1)


Answer: Information that it is the tests of the container image that failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [libavcodec/pcm-bluray.c: In function ‘pcm_bluray_decode_frame’:
libavcodec/pcm-bluray.c:170:45: error: passing argument 2 of ‘bytestream2_get_buffer’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  170 |                 bytestream2_get_buffer(&gb, dst16, buf_size);
      |                                             ^~~~~
      |                                             |
      |                                             int16_t * {aka short int *]: [This error is telling you that there is a problem with the way the bytestream2_get_buffer function is being used. The bytestream2_get_buffer function is supposed to take a uint8_t * pointer as its second argument, but in this case, it is being passed a int16_t * pointer. This is a type mismatch, and it is causing the compiler to generate an error.]


Answer: Issue: The RPM build failed because the sources cannot be compiled. The compilation error is caused by the fact that the pcm_bluray_decode_frame function is trying to use the bytestream2_get_buffer function to read audio data from a Blu-ray disc. Blu-ray discs use a format called Linear PCM, which is a type of uncompressed audio. The int16_t type is the most common way to represent uncompressed audio data in C. However, the bytestream2_get_buffer function is expecting a uint8_t * pointer, which is the type used to represent raw byte data.
Resolution: There are two ways to fix this error:

Change the type of the dst pointer to uint8_t *. This would require changing the way the pcm_bluray_decode_frame function is reading the audio data from the Blu-ray disc.

Change the way the bytestream2_get_buffer function is called. This could be done by providing a cast to uint8_t * to the second argument of the function. For example:

uint8_t *buffer = bytestream2_get_buffer(&gb, (uint8_t *)dst, buf_size);

This cast would tell the compiler that the dst pointer is actually a uint8_t * pointer, even though it is declared as an int16_t * pointer.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
libavcodec/pcm-bluray.c: In function ‘pcm_bluray_decode_frame’:
libavcodec/pcm-bluray.c:170:45: error: passing argument 2 of ‘bytestream2_get_buffer’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  170 |                 bytestream2_get_buffer(&gb, dst16, buf_size);
      |                                             ^~~~~
      |                                             |
      |                                             int16_t * {aka short int *

Answer: This error is telling you that there is a problem with the way the bytestream2_get_buffer function is being used. The bytestream2_get_buffer function is supposed to take a uint8_t * pointer as its second argument, but in this case, it is being passed a int16_t * pointer. This is a type mismatch, and it is causing the compiler to generate an error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Running Mkbootstrap for Storable ()
chmod 644 "Storable.bs"
"/usr/bin/perl" "/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp"  -typemap '/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap'  Storable.xs > Storable.xsc
Failed to load or import from ExtUtils::ParseXS (version 3.57). Please check that ExtUtils::ParseXS is installed correctly and that the newest version will be found in your @INC path: Can't locate fields.pm in @INC (you may need to install the fields module) (@INC entries checked: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.41 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.41 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS/Node.pm line 53.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS/Node.pm line 57.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm line 70.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm line 73.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp line 9.
make: *** [Makefile:366: Storable.c] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....]: [Here the build fails, because the perl module  'ExtUtils::ParseXS' could not locate perl module 'fields'.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the rpm which provides `perl(fields)` was not available in the buildroot and module 'ExtUtils::ParseXS' requires it.
Resolution: ExtUtils::ParseXS is provided by rpm perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS, so this package has to be updated to install all run-time dependencies. 
Because 'perl(fields)' was not found by perl-generators, it has to be listed in spec 'Requires: perl(fields)'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Running Mkbootstrap for Storable ()
chmod 644 "Storable.bs"
"/usr/bin/perl" "/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp"  -typemap '/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap'  Storable.xs > Storable.xsc
Failed to load or import from ExtUtils::ParseXS (version 3.57). Please check that ExtUtils::ParseXS is installed correctly and that the newest version will be found in your @INC path: Can't locate fields.pm in @INC (you may need to install the fields module) (@INC entries checked: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.41 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.41 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS/Node.pm line 53.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS/Node.pm line 57.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm line 70.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm line 73.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp line 9.
make: *** [Makefile:366: Storable.c] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Answer: Here the build fails, because the perl module  'ExtUtils::ParseXS' could not locate perl module 'fields'.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pat]: [It says there is a module not found.]


Answer: Issue: Module named 'path' was not found.
Resolution: Module 'path' needs to be imported.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pat

Answer: It says there is a module not found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [dawglib.c:42:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
   42 | PutDAWG (fp, buffer)
      | ^~~~~~~]: [Compiler warning about old style function definition being used in `dawglib.c`.
This is not an error by itself, but a stylistic deficiency.]
=============
[dawglib.c:48:5: error: too many arguments to function âChopNLâ
   48 |     ChopNL(buffer);
      |     ^~~~~~]: [Compiler error, function `ChopNL` is being called with too many arguments.]
=============
[dawglib.c:76:9: error: too many arguments to function âDebugâ
   76 |         Debug (1, "GetDAWG: read weird offset: %d\n", off);
      |         ^~~~~]: [Function `Debug` is being called with wrong number of arguments.]
=============
[dawglib.c:102:1: error: number of arguments doesnât match prototype
  102 | {
      | ^
libcrack.h:84:12: error: prototype declaration
   84 | extern int PackDAWG();
      |            ^~~~~~~~
]: [Number of arguments doesn't match the prototype `PackDAWG`.]
=============
[dawglib.c:121:1: error: number of arguments doesnât match prototype
  121 | {
      | ^
libcrack.h:86:12: error: prototype declaration
   86 | extern int UnPackDAWG();
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~]: [Number of arguments doesn't match the prototype `PackDAWG`.]
=============
[dawglib.c:81:5: warning: ignoring return value of âfgetsâ declared with attribute âwarn_unused_resultâ [-Wunused-result]
   81 |     fgets (gbuffer + off, STRINGSIZE - off, fp); /* includes NL */
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Compiler warning `fgets` return values is being ignored.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed due to multiple sever compiler errors. All concerning number of arguments used to call functions.
Resolution: Verify API of all libraries used as dependencies and adjust your code accordingly, or alter the constraints to retrieve versions with compatible API.

You can also attempt to resolve warnings produced by the compiler, to improve overall quality of your code.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
dawglib.c:42:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
   42 | PutDAWG (fp, buffer)
      | ^~~~~~~

Answer: Compiler warning about old style function definition being used in `dawglib.c`.
This is not an error by itself, but a stylistic deficiency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
dawglib.c:48:5: error: too many arguments to function âChopNLâ
   48 |     ChopNL(buffer);
      |     ^~~~~~

Answer: Compiler error, function `ChopNL` is being called with too many arguments.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
dawglib.c:76:9: error: too many arguments to function âDebugâ
   76 |         Debug (1, "GetDAWG: read weird offset: %d\n", off);
      |         ^~~~~

Answer: Function `Debug` is being called with wrong number of arguments.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
dawglib.c:102:1: error: number of arguments doesnât match prototype
  102 | {
      | ^
libcrack.h:84:12: error: prototype declaration
   84 | extern int PackDAWG();
      |            ^~~~~~~~


Answer: Number of arguments doesn't match the prototype `PackDAWG`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
dawglib.c:121:1: error: number of arguments doesnât match prototype
  121 | {
      | ^
libcrack.h:86:12: error: prototype declaration
   86 | extern int UnPackDAWG();
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Number of arguments doesn't match the prototype `PackDAWG`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
dawglib.c:81:5: warning: ignoring return value of âfgetsâ declared with attribute âwarn_unused_resultâ [-Wunused-result]
   81 |     fgets (gbuffer + off, STRINGSIZE - off, fp); /* includes NL */
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Compiler warning `fgets` return values is being ignored.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [:: [ 21:44:05 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1847925 &> snap1'
:: [ 21:44:05 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Get a screenshot (Expected 0, got 1)
:: [ 21:44:05 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Clean the tmux :: actually running 'tmux kill-session -t bz1847925'
no server running on /tmp/tmux-0/default
]: [Record of tmux crash]


Answer: Issue: The tmux tool has core-dumped.
Resolution: This is a known issue, please report it to the tmux team in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80294
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
:: [ 21:44:05 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1847925 &> snap1'
:: [ 21:44:05 ] :: [   FAIL   ] :: Get a screenshot (Expected 0, got 1)
:: [ 21:44:05 ] :: [  BEGIN   ] :: Clean the tmux :: actually running 'tmux kill-session -t bz1847925'
no server running on /tmp/tmux-0/default


Answer: Record of tmux crash
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 560, in main
    generate_requires(
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 456, in generate_requires
    generate_build_requirements(backend, requirements)
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 274, in generate_build_requirements
    new_reqs = get_requires(config_settings=requirements.config_settings)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 325, in get_requires_for_build_wheel
    return self._get_build_requires(config_settings, requirements=['wheel'])
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 295, in _get_build_requires
    self.run_setup()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 480, in run_setup
    super(_BuildMetaLegacyBackend, self).run_setup(setup_script=setup_script)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 311, in run_setup
    exec(code, locals())
  File "<string>", line 12, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pandas'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.MVFH9P (%generate_buildrequires)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.MVFH9P (%generate_buildrequires)
]: [Traceback from the build process. Imported module `pandas` was not found. ]


Answer: Issue: Module `pandas`, which is imported by the code used during the package build, is not present.
Resolution: Before the build begins, make sure that all required modules and other dependencies, are properly specified in the package SPEC file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 560, in main
    generate_requires(
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 456, in generate_requires
    generate_build_requirements(backend, requirements)
  File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py", line 274, in generate_build_requirements
    new_reqs = get_requires(config_settings=requirements.config_settings)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 325, in get_requires_for_build_wheel
    return self._get_build_requires(config_settings, requirements=['wheel'])
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 295, in _get_build_requires
    self.run_setup()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 480, in run_setup
    super(_BuildMetaLegacyBackend, self).run_setup(setup_script=setup_script)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 311, in run_setup
    exec(code, locals())
  File "<string>", line 12, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pandas'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.MVFH9P (%generate_buildrequires)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.MVFH9P (%generate_buildrequires)


Answer: Traceback from the build process. Imported module `pandas` was not found.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [udiskslinuxphysicalvolume.c:143:54: error: passing argument 2 of 'udisks_physical_volume_set_size' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]]: [The relevant error message saying that an argument of integer data type is passed in the 'udisks_physical_volume_set_size' function that expected a pointer argument.]
=============
[../../udisks/udisks-generated.h:5925:79: note: expected 'GVariant *' {aka 'struct _GVariant *'} but argument is of type 'guint64' {aka 'long unsigned int'}]: [Related compiler hint saying a 'GVariant *' data type is expected but the argument is of type 'guint64'.]
=============
[(process:26741): GLib-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: g_variant_type_checked_: assertion 'g_variant_type_string_is_valid (type_string)' failed

(process:26741): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: g_param_spec_variant: assertion 'type != NULL' failed

(process:26741): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: validate_pspec_to_install: assertion 'G_IS_PARAM_SPEC (pspec)' failed

(process:26741): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: g_param_spec_ref_sink: assertion 'G_IS_PARAM_SPEC (pspec)' failed

(process:26741): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: g_param_spec_unref: assertion 'G_IS_PARAM_SPEC (pspec)' failed
]: [Related gobject-introspection compiler message complaining about invalid type string.]


Answer: Issue: Judging by the gobject-introspection involvement in the build process and that the function definition that failed the compilation contains 'generated' in its name, it appears the C header was autogenerated, either from a gobject-introspection file or e.g. from a D-Bus introspection XML file.
Resolution: Judging by the 'assertion g_variant_type_string_is_valid (type_string) failed' message from 'g-ir-compiler', check the introspection file and correct data type definitions for a property with a similar name to 'udisks_physical_volume_set_size'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
udiskslinuxphysicalvolume.c:143:54: error: passing argument 2 of 'udisks_physical_volume_set_size' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]

Answer: The relevant error message saying that an argument of integer data type is passed in the 'udisks_physical_volume_set_size' function that expected a pointer argument.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
../../udisks/udisks-generated.h:5925:79: note: expected 'GVariant *' {aka 'struct _GVariant *'} but argument is of type 'guint64' {aka 'long unsigned int'}

Answer: Related compiler hint saying a 'GVariant *' data type is expected but the argument is of type 'guint64'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
(process:26741): GLib-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: g_variant_type_checked_: assertion 'g_variant_type_string_is_valid (type_string)' failed

(process:26741): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: g_param_spec_variant: assertion 'type != NULL' failed

(process:26741): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: validate_pspec_to_install: assertion 'G_IS_PARAM_SPEC (pspec)' failed

(process:26741): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: g_param_spec_ref_sink: assertion 'G_IS_PARAM_SPEC (pspec)' failed

(process:26741): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 12:46:37.502: g_param_spec_unref: assertion 'G_IS_PARAM_SPEC (pspec)' failed


Answer: Related gobject-introspection compiler message complaining about invalid type string.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Copr build error: Build fail]: [The results of the build.]
=============
[
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_point]: [Informs about an ImportError in the python script.]
=============
[
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_pointer
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 1]: [Informs about an ImportError and also informs that DNF command failed.]


Answer: Issue: The libdnf library has not been rebuilt in time to support the functionality in the package code.
Resolution: Rebuild the libdnf library before trying to build this package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Copr build error: Build fail

Answer: The results of the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_point

Answer: Informs about an ImportError in the python script.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_pointer
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 1

Answer: Informs about an ImportError and also informs that DNF command failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/driverctl-0.101-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/driverctl]: [The files can't be found for this RPM]


Answer: Issue: The problem is actually in the %make_install macro in the specfile, since there was a Fedora change to unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin folders (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin).

This causes the installation to add these files to the wrong location.
Resolution: There is a fix to add `PREFIX=%{_prefix} SBINDIR=%{_sbindir}` options to the `%make_install` macro
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/driverctl-0.101-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/driverctl

Answer: The files can't be found for this RPM
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [RPM build errors:
gcore.c: In function âdo_gcoreâ:
gcore.c:309:32: error: too few arguments to function âset_contextâ
  309 |                         (void) set_context(tc->task, NO_PID);
      |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from gcore.c:16:
/usr/include/crash/defs.h:6097:5: note: declared here
 6097 | int set_context(ulong, ulong, uint);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~
gcore.c:343:23: error: too few arguments to function âset_contextâ
  343 |                 (void)set_context(gcore->orig_task, NO_PID);
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/crash/defs.h:6097:5: note: declared here
 6097 | int set_context(ulong, ulong, uint);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~
make: *** [gcore.mk:111: gcore.so] Error 1]: [RPM build error, caused by compilation issue.
Function `do_gcore` has been called with wrong number of arguments.]


Answer: Issue: Code that was compiled for this package contained an error. Function `do_gcore` was called with a wrong number of arguments.
Resolution: Ensure your code compiles into binary, before attempting to build and package it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
gcore.c: In function âdo_gcoreâ:
gcore.c:309:32: error: too few arguments to function âset_contextâ
  309 |                         (void) set_context(tc->task, NO_PID);
      |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from gcore.c:16:
/usr/include/crash/defs.h:6097:5: note: declared here
 6097 | int set_context(ulong, ulong, uint);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~
gcore.c:343:23: error: too few arguments to function âset_contextâ
  343 |                 (void)set_context(gcore->orig_task, NO_PID);
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/crash/defs.h:6097:5: note: declared here
 6097 | int set_context(ulong, ulong, uint);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~
make: *** [gcore.mk:111: gcore.so] Error 1

Answer: RPM build error, caused by compilation issue.
Function `do_gcore` has been called with wrong number of arguments.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides (python3.14dist(orderly-set) >= 5.2.2 with python3.14dist(orderly-set) < 5.3) needed by python3-deepdiff-8.0.1-2.fc43.noarch from copr_base]: [Line detailing which package failed to install.]


Answer: Issue: Missing build dependency.
Resolution: Ensure the build system has all dependencies.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides (python3.14dist(orderly-set) >= 5.2.2 with python3.14dist(orderly-set) < 5.3) needed by python3-deepdiff-8.0.1-2.fc43.noarch from copr_base

Answer: Line detailing which package failed to install.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
 Problem 2: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-pandoc-2.2-1.fc37.noar]: [Pandoc package requires Python 3.11.]
=============
[ Problem 3: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) ]: [Sphinx package requires Python 3.10.]
=============
[
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-jupyter-client-8.2.0-1.fc39.noar]: [Jupyter dependency requires Python 3.11.]


Answer: Issue: Multilple dependencies require Python 3.11 or Python 3.10, but this build system only has Python 3.12.
Resolution: Dependencies need to have their dependence on Python corrected, so it points to actual Python version available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

 Problem 2: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-pandoc-2.2-1.fc37.noar

Answer: Pandoc package requires Python 3.11.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 Problem 3: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides python(abi) 

Answer: Sphinx package requires Python 3.10.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-jupyter-client-8.2.0-1.fc39.noar

Answer: Jupyter dependency requires Python 3.11.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [if_py_both.h:2412:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘PySequence_Fast_GET_SIZE’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
 2412 |                 if (PySequence_Fast_GET_SIZE(fast) != 2)
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [This is a compilation error.]


Answer: Issue: PySequence_Fast_GET_SIZE() function is not declared in the compilation unit after upgrading Python from 3.13 to 3.14 version.
Resolution: PySequence_Fast_GET_SIZE() is declared in cpython/abstract.h. You need to include it from the source file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
if_py_both.h:2412:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘PySequence_Fast_GET_SIZE’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
 2412 |                 if (PySequence_Fast_GET_SIZE(fast) != 2)
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: This is a compilation error.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
======================================================================
FAIL: test_sys_stdlib_modules_agrees (stdlibs.tests.StdlibsTest.test_sys_stdlib_modules_agrees)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-stdlibs-2025.4.4-build/stdlibs-2025.4.4/stdlibs/tests/__init__.py", line 47, in test_sys_stdlib_modules_agrees
    self.assertEqual(frozenset(), sys.stdlib_module_names - names)  # type: ignore
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: Items in the second set but not the first:
'_ast_unparse'
'_types'
'_hmac'

Answer: Failed test 2.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/n2n-2.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/edge
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/n2n-2.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/supernode]: [Detailed description of error]


Answer: Issue: The upstream changes the binary name
Resolution: The names must be fixed also in %files section
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/n2n-2.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/edge
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/n2n-2.1.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/bin/supernode

Answer: Detailed description of error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No match for argument: java-17-openjdk-devel]: [Required package java-17-openjdk-devel is missing.]


Answer: Issue: Because required package could not been installed.
Resolution: Check requirements specified in spec file, verify if all packages are available for target system and update spec file with proper package name or required version.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No match for argument: java-17-openjdk-devel

Answer: Required package java-17-openjdk-devel is missing.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [-- Checking for module 'mlt++-7>=7.32.0'
--   Package dependency requirement 'mlt++-7 >= 7.32.0' could not be satisfied.
Package 'mlt++-7' has version '7.30.0', required version is '>= 7.32.0'
]: [The build configuration phase fails due an unmet requirement.]


Answer: Issue: In the build configuration phase the mlt++ library was found at version 7.30.0, but the projects requires a newer version to be present in the buildroot.
Resolution: Coordination with the mlt package maintainer is required to get a newer version of the mlt++ library included.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
-- Checking for module 'mlt++-7>=7.32.0'
--   Package dependency requirement 'mlt++-7 >= 7.32.0' could not be satisfied.
Package 'mlt++-7' has version '7.30.0', required version is '>= 7.32.0'


Answer: The build configuration phase fails due an unmet requirement.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [../layer/VkLayer_FROG_gamescope_wsi.cpp:1231:16: error: redeclaration of âuint32_t imageCountâ
 1231 |       uint32_t imageCount = 0;
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~]: [This error indicates that the variable imageCount of type uint32_t has already been declared within the same scope. A scope in C++ is a region of code where a variable is accessible.]


Answer: Issue: Source code cannot be compiled due to an error in the source file layer/VkLayer_FROG_gamescope_wsi.cpp on line 1231.
Resolution: Check for accidental redeclarations: Ensure there's no other declaration of imageCount within the same function or block.
Review variable scope: If imageCount is declared in an outer scope (like a global variable or a variable in a parent function), it's already accessible within the current scope and doesn't need to be redeclared.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
../layer/VkLayer_FROG_gamescope_wsi.cpp:1231:16: error: redeclaration of âuint32_t imageCountâ
 1231 |       uint32_t imageCount = 0;
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~

Answer: This error indicates that the variable imageCount of type uint32_t has already been declared within the same scope. A scope in C++ is a region of code where a variable is accessible.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [WARNING: The found license expression 'AGPL-3' is not a valid SPDX expression. Inspect the project manually to find the license
]: [License of the project is not in SPDX format. Please change name of the license based on the SPDX sources.]
=============
[Fatal exception occurred: sdist not found.
]: [The source distribution archive of the python package can't be found. Seems that the source archive can't be created.]
=============
[Unable to generate spec for `odoo-addon-l10n-es-vat-book'
]: [Spec file can't be created by pyp2spec application for project odoo-addon-l10n-es-vat-book.]


Answer: Issue: Automatic conversion of the odoo-addon-l10n-es-vat-book project by pyp2spec application fails to create SRPM.
Resolution: Seems that the odoo-addon-l10n-es-vat-book project can't be converted to SRPM by pyp2spec application. Please try pyp2spec locally to debug the issue:

pyp2spec odoo-addon-l10n-es-vat-book --fedora-compliant --automode -v 17.0.1.2.0
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
WARNING: The found license expression 'AGPL-3' is not a valid SPDX expression. Inspect the project manually to find the license


Answer: License of the project is not in SPDX format. Please change name of the license based on the SPDX sources.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Fatal exception occurred: sdist not found.


Answer: The source distribution archive of the python package can't be found. Seems that the source archive can't be created.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Unable to generate spec for `odoo-addon-l10n-es-vat-book'


Answer: Spec file can't be created by pyp2spec application for project odoo-addon-l10n-es-vat-book.