fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [mv: cannot move 'rpm/storypointer-bundled-licenses.txt' to '/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs-storypointer-1.2.0-build/BUILDROOT/storypointer-bundled-licenses.txt': No such file or directory]: [File `rpm/storypointer-bundled-licenses.txt` can not be moved to new location, because it doesn't exist.]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 30646da3ed214b128ee75812799d1806 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1723560462.282425/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.st62n1dz:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/nodejs-storypointer.spec'

Copr build error: Build failed]: [General failure message.]


Answer: Issue: Build failed because new location for file `storypointer-bundled-licenses.txt` didn't exist.
Resolution: Ensure the target directory is present before moving any files into it.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
mv: cannot move 'rpm/storypointer-bundled-licenses.txt' to '/builddir/build/BUILD/nodejs-storypointer-1.2.0-build/BUILDROOT/storypointer-bundled-licenses.txt': No such file or directory

Answer: File `rpm/storypointer-bundled-licenses.txt` can not be moved to new location, because it doesn't exist.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 30646da3ed214b128ee75812799d1806 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1723560462.282425/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.st62n1dz:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/nodejs-storypointer.spec'

Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: General failure message.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig]: [This message indicates why the build failed. It explains that a dependency has not been found using pkgconfig.]


Answer: Issue: pkgconfig failed to find .pc file for the dependency which caused the build to fail. 
Resolution: Add "BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(bash-completion)" into the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig

Answer: This message indicates why the build failed. It explains that a dependency has not been found using pkgconfig.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [[ 14%] Built target MathMLSolver_shared
gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/openCOLLADA-1.6.70-build/OpenCOLLADA-1.6.70-maya/redhat-linux-build'
gmake: *** [Makefile:139: all] Error 2

error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pYU25I (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pYU25I (%build)

RPM build errors:
Finish: rpmbuild openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 1 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1745242947.611776/root/var/log/dnf5.log
INFO: chroot_scan: creating tarball /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan.tar.gz
/bin/tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm) Config(fedora-41-x86_64) 0 minutes 20 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: ]: [It's where it says error]


Answer: Issue: I have no clue
Resolution: For the build not to fail
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[ 14%] Built target MathMLSolver_shared
gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/openCOLLADA-1.6.70-build/OpenCOLLADA-1.6.70-maya/redhat-linux-build'
gmake: *** [Makefile:139: all] Error 2

error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pYU25I (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pYU25I (%build)

RPM build errors:
Finish: rpmbuild openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm
Finish: build phase for openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm
INFO: chroot_scan: 1 files copied to /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan
INFO: /var/lib/mock/fedora-41-x86_64-1745242947.611776/root/var/log/dnf5.log
INFO: chroot_scan: creating tarball /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/chroot_scan.tar.gz
/bin/tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/openCOLLADA-1.6.70-2.fc41.src.rpm) Config(fedora-41-x86_64) 0 minutes 20 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed: 

Answer: It's where it says error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mATsG0 (%build)]: [The failure in the build status code.]
=============
[/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/qstring.h:315:53: error: no type named ‘type’ in ‘struct std::enable_if<false, bool>’]: [Error related to invalid variable type.]


Answer: Issue: The failure in invalid type caused build to fail.
Resolution: Define currently undefined variable.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mATsG0 (%build)

Answer: The failure in the build status code.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/qstring.h:315:53: error: no type named ‘type’ in ‘struct std::enable_if<false, bool>’

Answer: Error related to invalid variable type.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CMake Error]: [CMake error]
=============
[cmake/generate_sbom.cmake:82]: [location where the CMake error occurred]
=============
[  Unexpected format for the download URL of project libfmt :
  (file:////builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.8-11.8.1-build/mariadb-11.8.1/redhat-linux-build/extra/libfmt/fmt-11.0.2.zip)
]: [Reason for the CMake error]


Answer: Issue: CMake failed
Resolution: CMake needs to be fixed.
Either by patching or by finding the correct argument to pass it to disable the problematic part.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error

Answer: CMake error
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
cmake/generate_sbom.cmake:82

Answer: location where the CMake error occurred
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  Unexpected format for the download URL of project libfmt :
  (file:////builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb11.8-11.8.1-build/mariadb-11.8.1/redhat-linux-build/extra/libfmt/fmt-11.0.2.zip)


Answer: Reason for the CMake error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [--------------------------
|diff --git a/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4 b/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4
|index e1b43f8..a3a2c84 100644
|--- a/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4
|+++ b/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.]: [missing autotools macro file]


Answer: Issue: it could not find Autotools macro file, because Autotools build system has been replaced with Meson
Resolution: change spec file to use Meson instead of Autotools
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
--------------------------
|diff --git a/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4 b/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4
|index e1b43f8..a3a2c84 100644
|--- a/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4
|+++ b/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.

Answer: missing autotools macro file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qIdE2g (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qIdE2g (%check)


Answer: This is the final rpmbuild output. It shows what build step has failed (%check in this case).
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.9.2']: [Package `python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.9.2` is not present in know repositories.]
=============
[No matching package to install: 'python3dist(python-dotenv) >= 1.0.1']: [Package `python3dist(python-dotenv) >= 1.0.1` is not available in known repositories.]
=============
[Not all dependencies satisfied]: [Package manager indicates that some dependencies couldn't be retrieved.]
=============
[This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to register.]: [Warning that system is not registered with Red Hat subscription. This is normal occurrence on temporary VMs which do not require full subscription for their purpose.]


Answer: Issue: Two requested packages couldn't be found. Without all the dependencies, the package couldn't be build.
Resolution: Verify that both packages are present in installed repositories. Check spelling of package names and version constraints. Verify network connection between repository server and system you are building on.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.9.2'

Answer: Package `python3dist(pydantic) >= 2.9.2` is not present in know repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(python-dotenv) >= 1.0.1'

Answer: Package `python3dist(python-dotenv) >= 1.0.1` is not available in known repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Not all dependencies satisfied

Answer: Package manager indicates that some dependencies couldn't be retrieved.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to register.

Answer: Warning that system is not registered with Red Hat subscription. This is normal occurrence on temporary VMs which do not require full subscription for their purpose.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [collecting ... collected 0 items / 20 errors]: [The test suite wasn't run successfully, all tests errored.]
=============
[________________ ERROR collecting _empty/tests/test_aiohttp.py _________________
ImportError while importing test module '/builddir/build/BUILD/python-uvloop-0.21.0-build/uvloop-0.21.0/_empty/tests/test_aiohttp.py'.
Hint: make sure your test modules/packages have valid Python names.
Traceback:
tests/test_aiohttp.py:14: in <module>
    from uvloop import _testbase as tb
../../BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/uvloop/__init__.py:6: in <module>
    from asyncio.events import BaseDefaultEventLoopPolicy as __BasePolicy
E   ImportError: cannot import name 'BaseDefaultEventLoopPolicy' from 'asyncio.events' (/usr/lib64/python3.14/asyncio/events.py)
]: [A traceback showing where the error happened. BaseDefaultEventLoopPolicy couldn't be imported from 'asyncio.events'.]
=============
[!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 20 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
============================== 20 errors in 0.47s ==============================]: [Summary shows that all 20 tests errored.]


Answer: Issue: 'BaseDefaultEventLoopPolicy' was removed from 'asyncio.events' in Python 3.14. uvloop code tries to import it and it fails.
Resolution: Package code needs to be updated to stop relying on a now-removed function.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
collecting ... collected 0 items / 20 errors

Answer: The test suite wasn't run successfully, all tests errored.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
________________ ERROR collecting _empty/tests/test_aiohttp.py _________________
ImportError while importing test module '/builddir/build/BUILD/python-uvloop-0.21.0-build/uvloop-0.21.0/_empty/tests/test_aiohttp.py'.
Hint: make sure your test modules/packages have valid Python names.
Traceback:
tests/test_aiohttp.py:14: in <module>
    from uvloop import _testbase as tb
../../BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.14/site-packages/uvloop/__init__.py:6: in <module>
    from asyncio.events import BaseDefaultEventLoopPolicy as __BasePolicy
E   ImportError: cannot import name 'BaseDefaultEventLoopPolicy' from 'asyncio.events' (/usr/lib64/python3.14/asyncio/events.py)


Answer: A traceback showing where the error happened. BaseDefaultEventLoopPolicy couldn't be imported from 'asyncio.events'.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 20 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
============================== 20 errors in 0.47s ==============================

Answer: Summary shows that all 20 tests errored.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:461:  Problem: package webkit2gtk4.0-devel-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x requires webkit2gtk4.0(s390-64) = 2.42.3-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:461:    - package webkit2gtk4.0-devel-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x requires libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:461:    - conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:461:    - nothing provides libWPEBackend-fdo-1.0.so.1()(64bit) needed by webkit2gtk4.0-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x
DEBUG util.py:461:    - nothing provides libwpe-1.0.so.1()(64bit) needed by webkit2gtk4.0-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x]: [The error message indicates that there is a problem installing the package webkit2gtk4.0-devel-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x. This package requires the package webkit2gtk4.0(s390-64) = 2.42.3-1.fc40, but this package cannot be installed because it has conflicting dependencies.

Specifically, the webkit2gtk4.0(s390-64) package requires the libraries libWPEBackend-fdo-1.0.so.1 and libwpe-1.0.so.1, but there are no packages available that provide these libraries.]


Answer: Issue: As a result, the installation of webkit2gtk4.0-devel-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x cannot be completed.
Resolution: To resolve this issue, you will need to either install the packages that contain libraries libWPEBackend-fdo-1.0.so.1 and libwpe-1.0.so.1, or modify the webkit2gtk4.0(s390-64) package to not require these libraries.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:461:  Problem: package webkit2gtk4.0-devel-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x requires webkit2gtk4.0(s390-64) = 2.42.3-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:461:    - package webkit2gtk4.0-devel-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x requires libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:461:    - conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:461:    - nothing provides libWPEBackend-fdo-1.0.so.1()(64bit) needed by webkit2gtk4.0-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x
DEBUG util.py:461:    - nothing provides libwpe-1.0.so.1()(64bit) needed by webkit2gtk4.0-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x

Answer: The error message indicates that there is a problem installing the package webkit2gtk4.0-devel-2.42.3-1.fc40.s390x. This package requires the package webkit2gtk4.0(s390-64) = 2.42.3-1.fc40, but this package cannot be installed because it has conflicting dependencies.

Specifically, the webkit2gtk4.0(s390-64) package requires the libraries libWPEBackend-fdo-1.0.so.1 and libwpe-1.0.so.1, but there are no packages available that provide these libraries.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
main.c:3362:113: error: too many arguments to function ‘aprint_file_time’; expected 0, have 1
 3362 |                                                         if (!SILENT) fprintf(stdout, "%s%s\n", CurrentFileName, aprint_file_time(CurrentFileTime));
      |                                                                                                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
agrep/agrep.h:106:14: note: declared here
  106 | extern char *aprint_file_time();
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: This compiler error makes the build fail.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
main.c:3383:62: error: too many arguments to function ‘forward_delimiter’; expected 0, have 5
 3383 |                         if (!GOUTTAIL) current_end = (CHAR *)forward_delimiter((long)current_end + GD_length, final_end, GD_pattern, GD_length, GOUTTAIL);
      |                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
agrep/agrep.h:102:16: note: declared here
  102 | unsigned char *forward_delimiter(), *backward_delimiter();
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: This compiler error makes the build fail.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
main.c:3384:52: error: too many arguments to function ‘forward_delimiter’; expected 0, have 5
 3384 |                         else current_end = (CHAR *)forward_delimiter(current_end, final_end, GD_pattern, GD_length, GOUTTAIL);
      |                                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
agrep/agrep.h:102:16: note: declared here
  102 | unsigned char *forward_delimiter(), *backward_delimiter();
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: This compiler error makes the build fail.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
main.c:3420:89: error: too many arguments to function ‘aprint_file_time’; expected 0, have 1
 3420 |                                 if (!SILENT) fprintf(stdout, "%s%s\n", CurrentFileName, aprint_file_time(CurrentFileTime));
      |                                                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
agrep/agrep.h:106:14: note: declared here
  106 | extern char *aprint_file_time();
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: This compiler error makes the build fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [configure.ac:74: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_ICONV]: [undefined macro]


Answer: Issue: Build failed because there is undefined macro
Resolution: Check where is the macro defined and fix it
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
configure.ac:74: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_ICONV

Answer: undefined macro
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "coreutils-9.5-1.eln136.x86_64" is already installed.
Package "findutils-1:4.9.0-8.eln134.x86_64" is already installed.
No match for argument: nodejs-npm
Package "tar-2:1.35-3.eln134.x86_64" is already installed.
Package "util-linux-2.40.1-1.eln136.x86_64" is already installed.
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages]: [It shows which packages are available and which ones arent.]


Answer: Issue: Package nodejs-npm can not be installed.
Resolution: Find the correct package name and add it as a build dependency.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "coreutils-9.5-1.eln136.x86_64" is already installed.
Package "findutils-1:4.9.0-8.eln134.x86_64" is already installed.
No match for argument: nodejs-npm
Package "tar-2:1.35-3.eln134.x86_64" is already installed.
Package "util-linux-2.40.1-1.eln136.x86_64" is already installed.
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages

Answer: It shows which packages are available and which ones arent.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/web-eid-2.6.0-build/web-eid/lib/libelectronic-id/lib/libpcsc-cpp/src/utils.cpp:23:
/builddir/build/BUILD/web-eid-2.6.0-build/web-eid/lib/libelectronic-id/lib/libpcsc-cpp/include/pcsc-cpp/pcsc-cpp.hpp:73:11: error: ‘uint16_t’ does not name a type
   73 | constexpr uint16_t toSW(byte_type sw1, byte_type sw2) noexcept
      |           ^~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/web-eid-2.6.0-build/web-eid/lib/libelectronic-id/lib/libpcsc-cpp/include/pcsc-cpp/pcsc-cpp.hpp:30:1: note: ‘uint16_t’ is defined in header ‘<cstdint>’; this is probably fixable by adding ‘#include <cstdint>’
   29 | #include <limits>
  +++ |+#include <cstdint>
   30 | ]: [Compilation of a source file fails because the compiler found an undeclared type.]


Answer: Issue: A common uint16_t type used in the source code hasn't been defined, because the header file with the definition hasn't been included.
Resolution: Include the <cstdint> header defining the uint16_t type in the source code file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/web-eid-2.6.0-build/web-eid/lib/libelectronic-id/lib/libpcsc-cpp/src/utils.cpp:23:
/builddir/build/BUILD/web-eid-2.6.0-build/web-eid/lib/libelectronic-id/lib/libpcsc-cpp/include/pcsc-cpp/pcsc-cpp.hpp:73:11: error: ‘uint16_t’ does not name a type
   73 | constexpr uint16_t toSW(byte_type sw1, byte_type sw2) noexcept
      |           ^~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/web-eid-2.6.0-build/web-eid/lib/libelectronic-id/lib/libpcsc-cpp/include/pcsc-cpp/pcsc-cpp.hpp:30:1: note: ‘uint16_t’ is defined in header ‘<cstdint>’; this is probably fixable by adding ‘#include <cstdint>’
   29 | #include <limits>
  +++ |+#include <cstdint>
   30 | 

Answer: Compilation of a source file fails because the compiler found an undeclared type.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/sysusers.d/testcloud.conf
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/sysusers.d/testcloud.conf]: [Error message]


Answer: Issue: There are installed but unpackaged files.
Resolution: Add those files to %files section of SPEC file or remove them from %install section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/sysusers.d/testcloud.conf
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/sysusers.d/testcloud.conf

Answer: Error message
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/npy_1_7_deprecated_api.h:17:2: warning: #warning "Using deprecated NumPy API, disable it with " "#define NPY_NO_DEPRECATED_API NPY_1_7_API_VERSION" [-Wcpp]
   17 | #warning "Using deprecated NumPy API, disable it with " \
      |  ^~~~~~~

Answer: Deprecated NumPy API being used.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: command '/usr/bin/gcc' failed with exit code 1

Answer: GCC exited with failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: Final build failure report.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py:204: _Warning: Package 'gensim.test.test_data' is absent from the `packages` configuratio

Answer: Imported package is absent from the 'packages' configuration. It isn't clear if the package should be distributed or not.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[2024-01-29 11:27:37,642][ ERROR][PID:2362777] Backend process error: No success file => build failur

Answer: Build failure detected as there was no success file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build warnings:
    %patchN is deprecated (1 usages found), use %patch N (or %patch -P N)

Answer: Usage of deprecated '%patchN' spec file directive.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ipyparallel/tests/test_asyncresult.py::TestAsyncResult::test_wait_for_send FAILED

Answer: TestAsyncResult::test_wait_for_send has failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/clienttest.py:83: Test requires distributed
SKIPPED [3] ipyparallel/tests/test_joblib.py:29: Requires joblib >= 0.10
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:44: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:143: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:152: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:51: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:82: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:120: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:98: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:106: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:132: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:159: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:183: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:195: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:171: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_db.py:64: Requires mongodb
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:174: Requires mpiexec
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:156: Requires mpiexec
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:121: Requires mpiexec
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:106: Requires mpiexec
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:280: Requires mpiexec
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:174: Requires slurm
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:156: Requires slurm
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:121: Requires slurm
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:106: Requires slurm
SKIPPED [1] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:280: Requires slurm
SKIPPED [2] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:174: Needs docker compose
SKIPPED [2] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:156: Needs docker compose
SKIPPED [2] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:121: Needs docker compose
SKIPPED [2] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:106: Needs docker compose
SKIPPED [2] ipyparallel/tests/test_cluster.py:280: Needs docker compose
SKIPPED [2] ipyparallel/tests/clienttest.py:83: Test requires pandas
SKIPPED [6] ipyparallel/tests/clienttest.py:83: Test requires cloudpickle

Answer: Multiple tests skipped. This could be a sign of insufficient test coverage.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
%patchN is deprecated (3 usages found), use %patch N (or %patch -P N)

Answer: Deprecation warning, could be a sign of long term maintenance issues.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
>       with pytest.raises(TimeoutError):
E       Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'TimeoutError'>

Answer: Tested code did not raise TimeoutError, thus violating the test assertion and failing the test.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ipyparallel/tests/test_asyncresult.py:398: Failed

Answer: Location of the test code assertion breach.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[2024-01-26 05:54:20,295][ ERROR][PID:3743068] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failur

Answer: Build failure reported.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[2024-01-26 05:54:20,306][ ERROR][PID:3743068] Backend process error: No success file => build failur

Answer: Build failure reported.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    %patchN is deprecated (3 usages found), use %patch N (or %patch -P N

Answer: Deprecated RPM directive. This could indicate long term maintenance issues.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Waf: Entering directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.10.0/build/default'
source not found: '../heimdal/tools/kinit'
raise WafError: source not found: '../heimdal/tools/kinit'
make[2]: *** [build-default/configure] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.10.0/build/default'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:50: all] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.10.0/build/default'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YYYYYY (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YYYYYY (%build)]: [Contains main issue]


Answer: Issue: Missing configure flag
Resolution: Add --with-system-heimdalkrb5 to configure as a argument.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Waf: Entering directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.10.0/build/default'
source not found: '../heimdal/tools/kinit'
raise WafError: source not found: '../heimdal/tools/kinit'
make[2]: *** [build-default/configure] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.10.0/build/default'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:50: all] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.10.0/build/default'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YYYYYY (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YYYYYY (%build)

Answer: Contains main issue
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(check-manifest]: [Dependency 'check-manifest' isn't available.]
=============
[
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(twine]: [Dependency 'twine' isn't available.]


Answer: Issue: Dependencies are not available in RHEL 9 BaseOS, AppStream or CRB repositories.
Resolution: Only depend on packages available in the repositories, or ensure they are in repositories before making a build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3dist(check-manifest

Answer: Dependency 'check-manifest' isn't available.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3dist(twine

Answer: Dependency 'twine' isn't available.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Copr build error: Build failed]: [Build failure message.]
=============
[
Copr repository                                 3.4 kB/s | 257  B     00:00    
Additional repo copr_freeipa_freeipa_master_fed 5.3 kB/s | 341  B     00:00    
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'copr_freeipa_freeipa_master_fedora_releasever_basearch':
  - Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@freeipa/freeipa-master/fedora-38-aarch64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 108.138.85.53)
Error: Failed to download m]: [Final, unsuccessful attempt to download repository metadata.]
=============
[
This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to registe]: [Server isn't enrolled in Red Hat subscription. ]
=============
[[2024-01-30 06:54:14,752][ ERROR][PID:3785726] Backend process error: No success file => build failur]: [Build was declared as failed, since there is no success file. ]


Answer: Issue: Package repository was not available.
Resolution: Ensure that all repositories used by package manager are available before build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: Build failure message.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Copr repository                                 3.4 kB/s | 257  B     00:00    
Additional repo copr_freeipa_freeipa_master_fed 5.3 kB/s | 341  B     00:00    
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'copr_freeipa_freeipa_master_fedora_releasever_basearch':
  - Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@freeipa/freeipa-master/fedora-38-aarch64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 108.138.85.53)
Error: Failed to download m

Answer: Final, unsuccessful attempt to download repository metadata.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to registe

Answer: Server isn't enrolled in Red Hat subscription.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
[2024-01-30 06:54:14,752][ ERROR][PID:3785726] Backend process error: No success file => build failur

Answer: Build was declared as failed, since there is no success file.