fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(hatchling) >= 1.11]: [The package ''python3.11dist" does not exist or does not ship the version "1.11".]
=============
[
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found]: [Missing dependencies due to unavailability of some packages.]


Answer: Issue: Unmet dependencies
Resolution: Either choose a different package or make it available by allowing a different package repository.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(hatchling) >= 1.11

Answer: The package ''python3.11dist" does not exist or does not ship the version "1.11".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found

Answer: Missing dependencies due to unavailability of some packages.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
# FAIL: ]: [One test failed.]
=============
[
FAIL: src/tls/test-socket-activation-help]: [Test 'src/tls/test-socket-activation-helper' failed.]
=============
[
FAIL: src/tls/test-socket-activation-helper.]: [Test 'src/tls/test-socket-activation-helper.sh' failed.]
=============
[./src/tls/test-socket-activation-helper.sh: line 1: kill: (9199) - No such process]: [Test tried to kill a process that doesn't exist.]


Answer: Issue: Test suite did not pass.
Resolution: Restart the build, or investigate the failing tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

# FAIL: 

Answer: One test failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

FAIL: src/tls/test-socket-activation-help

Answer: Test 'src/tls/test-socket-activation-helper' failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

FAIL: src/tls/test-socket-activation-helper.

Answer: Test 'src/tls/test-socket-activation-helper.sh' failed.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
./src/tls/test-socket-activation-helper.sh: line 1: kill: (9199) - No such process

Answer: Test tried to kill a process that doesn't exist.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAILED: igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o 
/usr/bin/g++ @igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o.rsp -MD -MT igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o -MF igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o.d -o igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/compute-runtime-23.35.27191.9/opencl/source/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp
/builddir/build/BUILD/compute-runtime-23.35.27191.9/opencl/source/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp: In static member function ‘static bool NEO::ClMemoryPropertiesHelper::parseMemoryProperties(const cl_mem_properties_intel*, NEO::MemoryProperties&, cl_mem_flags&, cl_mem_flags_intel&, cl_mem_alloc_flags_intel&, ObjType, NEO::Context&)’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/compute-runtime-23.35.27191.9/opencl/source/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp:64:18: error: ‘CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘CL_MEM_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR’?
   64 |             case CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR:
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                  CL_MEM_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR
/builddir/build/BUILD/compute-runtime-23.35.27191.9/opencl/source/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp:65:45: error: ‘CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_END_KHR’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘CL_MEM_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_END_KHR’?
   65 |                 while (properties[i + 1] != CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_END_KHR) {
      |                                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                             CL_MEM_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_END_KH]: [The real cause of the build failure is here. ]


Answer: Issue: CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR used to come from opencl-headers package, which changed, and stopped providing the definition of said constant.
Resolution: Either downgrade the opencl-headers, or backport upstream commit fixing the issue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED: igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o 
/usr/bin/g++ @igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o.rsp -MD -MT igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o -MF igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o.d -o igdrcl_lib_release/CMakeFiles/igdrcl_lib_release.dir/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/compute-runtime-23.35.27191.9/opencl/source/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp
/builddir/build/BUILD/compute-runtime-23.35.27191.9/opencl/source/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp: In static member function ‘static bool NEO::ClMemoryPropertiesHelper::parseMemoryProperties(const cl_mem_properties_intel*, NEO::MemoryProperties&, cl_mem_flags&, cl_mem_flags_intel&, cl_mem_alloc_flags_intel&, ObjType, NEO::Context&)’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/compute-runtime-23.35.27191.9/opencl/source/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp:64:18: error: ‘CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘CL_MEM_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR’?
   64 |             case CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR:
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                  CL_MEM_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_KHR
/builddir/build/BUILD/compute-runtime-23.35.27191.9/opencl/source/helpers/cl_memory_properties_helpers.cpp:65:45: error: ‘CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_END_KHR’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘CL_MEM_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_END_KHR’?
   65 |                 while (properties[i + 1] != CL_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_END_KHR) {
      |                                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                             CL_MEM_DEVICE_HANDLE_LIST_END_KH

Answer: The real cause of the build failure is here.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Copr build error: Build failed]: [Message indicating general build failure.]
=============
[Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
]: [Required package `clang = 13.0.0` is not available in any of the provided repositories.]


Answer: Issue: One of the dependencies was unmet.
Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies are available from installed repos.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Copr build error: Build failed

Answer: Message indicating general build failure.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch


Answer: Required package `clang = 13.0.0` is not available in any of the provided repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [process_iterator_linux.c:114:36: warning: â/statâ directive writing 5 bytes into a region of size between 4 and 13 [-Wformat-overflow=]
  114 |         sprintf(statfile, "/proc/%d/stat", pid);
      |                                    ^~~~~]: [Compiler warning, stating that a directive is performing write into region with possible overflows. The function `sprintf` is being used in an unsafe manner. ]
=============
[In function âsprintfâ,
    inlined from âgetppid_ofâ at process_iterator_linux.c:114:2:
/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:30:10: note: â__sprintf_chkâ output between 13 and 22 bytes into a destination of size 20
   30 |   return __builtin___sprintf_chk (__s, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   31 |                                   __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt,
      |                                   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   32 |                                   __va_arg_pack ());
      |                                   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Compiler warning, stating that the output of `__sprintf_chk` is written into destination of which may be too small to contain it. This could be cause of security issues and runtime errors.]
=============
[busy.c:20:58: error: passing argument 3 of âpthread_createâ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
   20 |                 if ((ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, loop, NULL)) != 0)
      |                                                          ^~~~
      |                                                          |
      |                                                          void * (*)(void)]: [Compiler error, stating that the third argument passed to the `pthread_create` function has an incompatible pointer type. ]


Answer: Issue: Apart from several warnings, which while cause for concern have not caused the build to fail, there has been an issue with third argument passed to the `pthread_create` function.
The argument has a wrong pointer type, causing compile time error. 
Resolution: Inspect your code and ensure that all arguments passed to `pthread_create` and other functions in your codebase are of correct type.

Also, if possible, attempt to resolve all warnings produced by the compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
process_iterator_linux.c:114:36: warning: â/statâ directive writing 5 bytes into a region of size between 4 and 13 [-Wformat-overflow=]
  114 |         sprintf(statfile, "/proc/%d/stat", pid);
      |                                    ^~~~~

Answer: Compiler warning, stating that a directive is performing write into region with possible overflows. The function `sprintf` is being used in an unsafe manner.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
In function âsprintfâ,
    inlined from âgetppid_ofâ at process_iterator_linux.c:114:2:
/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:30:10: note: â__sprintf_chkâ output between 13 and 22 bytes into a destination of size 20
   30 |   return __builtin___sprintf_chk (__s, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   31 |                                   __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt,
      |                                   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   32 |                                   __va_arg_pack ());
      |                                   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Compiler warning, stating that the output of `__sprintf_chk` is written into destination of which may be too small to contain it. This could be cause of security issues and runtime errors.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
busy.c:20:58: error: passing argument 3 of âpthread_createâ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
   20 |                 if ((ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, loop, NULL)) != 0)
      |                                                          ^~~~
      |                                                          |
      |                                                          void * (*)(void)

Answer: Compiler error, stating that the third argument passed to the `pthread_create` function has an incompatible pointer type.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Problem: cannot install both gcc-15.0.0-0.2.fc42.aarch64 from https_dmalcolm_fedorapeople_org_gcc_gcc_15_mass_prebuild_arch and gcc-14.2.1-6.fc42.aarch64 from fedora
  - package libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64 from fedora requires gcc(major) = 14, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates]: [Package manager error. Package `libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64` requires `gcc(major) = 14`. However `gcc(major) = 14` is not available from any of the installed repositories.]


Answer: Issue: One of the required packages depends on `gcc(major) = 14` which is not available from any installed repository.
Resolution: All direct and indirect dependencies must be satisfied before the build is attempted. You may loosen constraints on packages required, replace them with alternatives, or provide them yourself.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Problem: cannot install both gcc-15.0.0-0.2.fc42.aarch64 from https_dmalcolm_fedorapeople_org_gcc_gcc_15_mass_prebuild_arch and gcc-14.2.1-6.fc42.aarch64 from fedora
  - package libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64 from fedora requires gcc(major) = 14, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates

Answer: Package manager error. Package `libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64` requires `gcc(major) = 14`. However `gcc(major) = 14` is not available from any of the installed repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_logic/test_batch_logic.py::TestBatchesLogic::test_large_batch_build_queue
================ 1 failed, 479 passed, 25057 warnings in 36.32s ================]: [The Python testsuite failed here.]


Answer: Issue: The test-case `test_large_batch_build_queue` failed -> either the test is bad, or the code is broken.
Resolution: Open the test case, poke around, and fix either the test case, or the broken Python code.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_logic/test_batch_logic.py::TestBatchesLogic::test_large_batch_build_queue
================ 1 failed, 479 passed, 25057 warnings in 36.32s ================

Answer: The Python testsuite failed here.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)

contrib/meson.build:14:24: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconf]: [This part says the buildsuite didn't find a required dependency - bash-completion and so cannot proceed.]


Answer: Issue: The required dependency isn't present in the buildroot.
Resolution: Explicitly require bash-completion in the spec file of the package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)

contrib/meson.build:14:24: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconf

Answer: This part says the buildsuite didn't find a required dependency - bash-completion and so cannot proceed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.3 (running go 1.23.1; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)]: [This line tells the exact problem.]


Answer: Issue: It requires a newer Go version than is installed on the system.
Resolution: You either need to update the GO version on the system or try to build an older version of your package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
go: go.mod requires go >= 1.23.3 (running go 1.23.1; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)

Answer: This line tells the exact problem.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [PHPUnit 7.5.20 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Runtime:       PHP 8.4.7
]: [Test suite is running PHPUnit version 7 with PHP version 8.4]
=============
[PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught Error: Class "PHPUnit\Framework\Error\Deprecated" not found in /usr/share/php/PHPUnit7/Util/ErrorHandler.php:62
]: [phpunit7 raises a PHP exception]


Answer: Issue: phpunit7 has reached its end of live and is no more supported

phpunit7 is not compatible with PHP 8.4
Resolution: The test suite needs to be adapted to run with modern PHPunit (phpunit8, phpunit9...)
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
PHPUnit 7.5.20 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Runtime:       PHP 8.4.7


Answer: Test suite is running PHPUnit version 7 with PHP version 8.4
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught Error: Class "PHPUnit\Framework\Error\Deprecated" not found in /usr/share/php/PHPUnit7/Util/ErrorHandler.php:62


Answer: phpunit7 raises a PHP exception
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/python-josepy-2.0.0-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/jws]: [The snippet informs about unpackaged file /usr/bin/jws]


Answer: Issue: The /usr/bin/jws is missing in the files section of specfile.
Resolution: Add %{_bindir}/jws into specfile files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILD/python-josepy-2.0.0-build/BUILDROOT
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/bin/jws

Answer: The snippet informs about unpackaged file /usr/bin/jws
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [t9402-git-cvsserver-refs.sh                      (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 37 Failed: 4)
  Failed tests:  30-32, 34
  Non-zero exit status: 1]: [This message shows which tests have failed]
=============
['cvs.log' is not empty, it contains:
++ cat cvs.log
Possible precedence problem between ! and pattern match (m//) at /builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/git-cvsserver line 5015.]: [This code shows why the test has failed]


Answer: Issue: The build has failed because of Perl warning message has populated cvs.log during the tests. The tests doesn't expect this message and fail instead.
Resolution: Work with upstream code to suppress this Perl warning. The code that produces this warning is in file git-cvsserver on line 5015
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
t9402-git-cvsserver-refs.sh                      (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 37 Failed: 4)
  Failed tests:  30-32, 34
  Non-zero exit status: 1

Answer: This message shows which tests have failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
'cvs.log' is not empty, it contains:
++ cat cvs.log
Possible precedence problem between ! and pattern match (m//) at /builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/git-cvsserver line 5015.

Answer: This code shows why the test has failed
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in linux_os/guide/services/ssh/sshd_approved_ciphers.var]: [Attempt to execute merge in git failed, due to conflict in file `linux_os/guide/services/ssh/sshd_approved_ciphers.var`.]
=============
[Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.']: [Message indicates that automatic merge has failed due to conflicts. This message was produced by git version control system.]
=============
[Error: Invalid value for '[PATH_OR_URL]': Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(1)
  cmdline: git merge pr-changes/12949
  stdout: 'Auto-merging linux_os/guide/services/ssh/sshd_approved_ciphers.var
]: [Packit command `packit prepare-sources [OPTIONS] [PATH_OR_URL]` was not provided with valid value for argument `PATH_OR_URL`. This happened while attempting to execute merge of `pr-changes/12949` branch.]


Answer: Issue: Automated merge of changes in branch `pr-changes/12949` of the project failed due to conflicting changes made in file linux_os/guide/services/ssh/sshd_approved_ciphers.var`
Resolution: Before attempting to merge branches of the source, verify that there are no possible conflicts between changes on both branches. And resolve them if they exist.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in linux_os/guide/services/ssh/sshd_approved_ciphers.var

Answer: Attempt to execute merge in git failed, due to conflict in file `linux_os/guide/services/ssh/sshd_approved_ciphers.var`.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.'

Answer: Message indicates that automatic merge has failed due to conflicts. This message was produced by git version control system.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Invalid value for '[PATH_OR_URL]': Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(1)
  cmdline: git merge pr-changes/12949
  stdout: 'Auto-merging linux_os/guide/services/ssh/sshd_approved_ciphers.var


Answer: Packit command `packit prepare-sources [OPTIONS] [PATH_OR_URL]` was not provided with valid value for argument `PATH_OR_URL`. This happened while attempting to execute merge of `pr-changes/12949` branch.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [No matching package to install:]: [dnf output stating tha package was not able to be installed]
=============
[Error: Some packages could not be found.]: [Final error from dnf, stating that dnf was not able to find all dependencies]


Answer: Issue: BuildRequires were not satisfied.
Resolution: Make the build requires available: build them first for the target, make them available via side tags.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
No matching package to install:

Answer: dnf output stating tha package was not able to be installed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: Some packages could not be found.

Answer: Final error from dnf, stating that dnf was not able to find all dependencies
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.18.1-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-8.3.5-2.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-cov-5.0.0-2.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-setuptools-78.1.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Problem: cannot install both python3-packaging-24.2-3.fc42.noarch from fedora and python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch from @System
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests]: [Describes the failed transaction.]


Answer: Issue: There is a conflict in the build requirements, causing the transaction to fail.
Resolution: Investigate the build requirements and resolve the conflict. It'll probably require removing version limits from some of the packages.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pyproject-rpm-macros-1.18.1-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-8.3.5-2.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-pytest-cov-5.0.0-2.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Package "python3-setuptools-78.1.0-1.fc43.noarch" is already installed.
Problem: cannot install both python3-packaging-24.2-3.fc42.noarch from fedora and python3-packaging-25.0-1.fc43.noarch from @System
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests

Answer: Describes the failed transaction.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates
  --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages]: [Requested package `clang = 13.0.0` is not available from any of the installed package repositories.]


Answer: Issue: Required package is not available for installation, and therefore, a key dependency is unmet.
Resolution: Ensure that all dependencies are available in installed repositories. This may mean installation of additional  repositories.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates
  --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages

Answer: Requested package `clang = 13.0.0` is not available from any of the installed package repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/pytest -v tests.py]: [On this line the build is trying to run pytest with an argument of the file tests.py.]
=============
[ERROR: file or directory not found: tests.py]: [This line is letting us know that the file tests.py does not exist.]


Answer: Issue: In the upstream software, version 1.8.1 contained the file tests.py, but in version 1.9.0 that file was renamed to tests/test_yte.py.
Resolution: Pytest should be run with an argument of tests/test_yte.py, or with no argument at all which may automatically detect the tests.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/pytest -v tests.py

Answer: On this line the build is trying to run pytest with an argument of the file tests.py.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: file or directory not found: tests.py

Answer: This line is letting us know that the file tests.py does not exist.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [file.c:2091:62: error: passing argument 3 of ‘pthread_create’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
 2091 |             pthread_exists = (pthread_create(&fthread, NULL, do_autobackup, NULL) == 0) ? 1 : 0;
      |                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                              |
      |                                                              void * (*)(void)
In file included from file.c:87:
/usr/include/pthread.h:204:36: note: expected ‘void * (*)(void *)’ but argument is of type ‘void * (*)(void)’
  204 |                            void *(*__start_routine) (void *),
      |                            ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]: [Failure of make compilation]


Answer: Issue: incompatible pointer types were inserted to the function, probably an issue with changes between gcc versions which made it stricter.
Resolution: Rewrite the source code to use correct types
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
file.c:2091:62: error: passing argument 3 of ‘pthread_create’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
 2091 |             pthread_exists = (pthread_create(&fthread, NULL, do_autobackup, NULL) == 0) ? 1 : 0;
      |                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                              |
      |                                                              void * (*)(void)
In file included from file.c:87:
/usr/include/pthread.h:204:36: note: expected ‘void * (*)(void *)’ but argument is of type ‘void * (*)(void)’
  204 |                            void *(*__start_routine) (void *),
      |                            ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Answer: Failure of make compilation
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error: YAML Exception reading /home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md: (<unknown>): did not find expected key while parsing a block mapping at line 28 column 7]: [It shows the YAML error in the file "web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md" at line 28, column 7.]


Answer: Issue: The file "web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md" has invalid YAML syntax, a key was expected at line 28, column 7.
Resolution: Fix the YAML syntax in the file "web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md".
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error: YAML Exception reading /home/travis/build/faktaoklimatu/web-cz/web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md: (<unknown>): did not find expected key while parsing a block mapping at line 28 column 7

Answer: It shows the YAML error in the file "web-core/collections/_studies/2023-reserse-vodik.md" at line 28, column 7.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ ruby -Ilib:test test/test_all.rb

Answer: Running minitest style file, the `test/test_all.rb` contains configuration for which tests to run.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
1198 runs, 4001 assertions, 20 failures, 37 errors, 2 skips

Answer: Lines with results that details the amount of failures and errors.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 57) Failure:
Transport::Kex::TestDiffieHellmanGroup14SHA256#test_exchange_keys_when_server_signature_could_not_be_verified_should_raise_exception [transport/kex/test_diffie_hellman_group1_sha1.rb:44]:
[Net::SSH::Exception] exception expected, not
Class: &lt;OpenSSL::PKey::PKeyError&gt;
Message: &lt;"EVP_DigestVerifyInit: invalid digest"&gt;
---Backtrace---
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-net-ssh-7.3.0-build/net-ssh-7.3.0/usr/share/gems/gems/net-ssh-7.3.0/lib/net/ssh/transport/openssl.rb:73:in 'OpenSSL::PKey::PKey#verify'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-net-ssh-7.3.0-build/net-ssh-7.3.0/usr/share/gems/gems/net-ssh-7.3.0/lib/net/ssh/transport/openssl.rb:73:in 'OpenSSL::PKey::RSA#ssh_do_verify'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-net-ssh-7.3.0-build/net-ssh-7.3.0/usr/share/gems/gems/net-ssh-7.3.0/lib/net/ssh/transport/kex/abstract.rb:107:in 'block in Net::SSH::Transport::Kex::Abstract#verify_signature'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-net-ssh-7.3.0-build/test/common.rb:95:in 'MockTransport::BlockVerifier#verify_signature'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-net-ssh-7.3.0-build/net-ssh-7.3.0/usr/share/gems/gems/net-ssh-7.3.0/lib/net/ssh/transport/kex/abstract.rb:107:in 'Net::SSH::Transport::Kex::Abstract#verify_signature'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-net-ssh-7.3.0-build/net-ssh-7.3.0/usr/share/gems/gems/net-ssh-7.3.0/lib/net/ssh/transport/kex/abstract.rb:50:in 'Net::SSH::Transport::Kex::Abstract#exchange_keys'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-net-ssh-7.3.0-build/test/transport/kex/test_diffie_hellman_group1_sha1.rb:100:in 'Transport::Kex::TestDiffieHellmanGroup1SHA1#exchange!'
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-net-ssh-7.3.0-build/test/transport/kex/test_diffie_hellman_group1_sha1.rb:44:in 'block in Transport::Kex::TestDiffieHellmanGroup1SHA1#test_exchange_keys_when_server_signature_could_not_be_verified_should_raise_exception'
---------------

Answer: Example failures, `Message: &lt;"EVP_DigestVerifyInit: invalid digest"&gt;` details that the cause is an exception due to invalid digest. which is not expected error in this case. "transport/kex/test_diffie_hellman_group1_sha1.rb" hints that the tests concern SHA1 digests that are not valid in newer OpenSSL crypto configurations.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: ncurses-devel > 12
]: [builder cant prepare buildroot]


Answer: Issue: Required version of build dependency is not available
Resolution: Check if needed version is available in any buildroot / repo. Required version may not be available, check if this version is really needed. Also if older version is required, look for "compat" package
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: ncurses-devel > 12


Answer: builder cant prepare buildroot