fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

util-host-info.c:94:31: error: passing argument 1 of âpcre2_substring_list_free_8â from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
   94 |     pcre2_substring_list_free((PCRE2_SPTR *)list);
      |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                               |
      |                               const PCRE2_UCHAR8 ** {aka const unsigned char **}
In file included from suricata-common.h:155,
                 from util-host-info.c:27:
/usr/include/pcre2.h:949:1: note: expected âPCRE2_UCHAR8 **â {aka âunsigned char **â} but argument is of type âconst PCRE2_UCHAR8 **â {aka âconst unsigned char **â}
  949 | PCRE2_TYPES_STRUCTURES_AND_FUNCTIONS
      |

Answer: This is causing the build to fail, as the make command fails with Error.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/oc-openshift-clients-4.15.0-202402082307/debugsourcefiles.list': No such file or directory]: [This file does not exist but it is deleted in spec file.]


Answer: Issue: Because in the specfile in install section there is line that deletes a file which does not exist.
Resolution: Drop the rm.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
rm: cannot remove '/builddir/build/BUILD/oc-openshift-clients-4.15.0-202402082307/debugsourcefiles.list': No such file or directory

Answer: This file does not exist but it is deleted in spec file.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.]: [A lookup error while searching for a tox configuration in the current directory]
=============
[  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/tox_current_env/hooks4.py", line 82, in tox_add_core_config]: [tox_add_core_config has raised an error becasue the tox config file was not found.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the tox config was not found in the current directory which resulted in a an error in the tox_add_core_config function.
Resolution: Ensure that the config file is in the correct directory and is named correctly (tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml).

See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.

Answer: A lookup error while searching for a tox configuration in the current directory
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/tox_current_env/hooks4.py", line 82, in tox_add_core_config

Answer: tox_add_core_config has raised an error becasue the tox config file was not found.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ pytest --junit-xml=./junit.xml -v integration-tests


Answer: run of pytest integration tests
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
integration-tests/test_register.py::test_register 


Answer: a test
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
integration-tests/test_register.py::test_register_with_org 


Answer: a test to verify a user can register a system using org attribute
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [checking whether g++ supports C++14 features by default... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=gnu++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=gnu++1y... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=c++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with +std=c++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -h std=c++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=c++1y... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with +std=c++1y... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -h std=c++1y... no
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++14 language features is required.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PJ0KwX (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PJ0KwX (%build)]: [Description of failures of build]


Answer: Issue: There was a check if the compiler has support for required features, but it doesn't.
Resolution: Try another compiler or remove the check.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features by default... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=gnu++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=gnu++1y... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=c++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with +std=c++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -h std=c++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=c++1y... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with +std=c++1y... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -h std=c++1y... no
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++14 language features is required.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PJ0KwX (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PJ0KwX (%build)

Answer: Description of failures of build
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/tmp/all_interfaces.conf
   /usr/share/tmp/credcheck.tmp
   /usr/share/tmp/iferror.m4
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/tmp/all_interfaces.conf
   /usr/share/tmp/credcheck.tmp
   /usr/share/tmp/iferror.m4]: [Error explaining that there are unpackaged files in the RPM specfile]


Answer: Issue: There are unpackaged, but installed files
Resolution: Add the installed files to the %files specfile section, or if these files are not supposed to be added, remove them or don't install them at all.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/tmp/all_interfaces.conf
   /usr/share/tmp/credcheck.tmp
   /usr/share/tmp/iferror.m4
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/tmp/all_interfaces.conf
   /usr/share/tmp/credcheck.tmp
   /usr/share/tmp/iferror.m4

Answer: Error explaining that there are unpackaged files in the RPM specfile
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc39.s390x.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254]: [Multiple unpackaged files were found. This unacceptable, as all installed files must be tracked by the package manager for purposes of future updates, or removal.

Not to mention the inherent security risk.]
=============
[RPM build errors:
    absolute symlink: /usr/bin/clang-format-diff -> /usr/share/clang/clang-format-diff.py
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc39.s390x.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254]: [Full list of RPM errors encountered during the build. 
The most important being the existence of unpackaged installed files.]


Answer: Issue: Multiple files were installed by the package but not tracked in the spec file, therefore they were not packaged and could cause issues in the future.

Resolution: Ensure that all files installed by the package are tracked in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc39.s390x.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254

Answer: Multiple unpackaged files were found. This unacceptable, as all installed files must be tracked by the package manager for purposes of future updates, or removal.

Not to mention the inherent security risk.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
RPM build errors:
    absolute symlink: /usr/bin/clang-format-diff -> /usr/share/clang/clang-format-diff.py
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc39.s390x.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254

Answer: Full list of RPM errors encountered during the build. 
The most important being the existence of unpackaged installed files.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ cd console-setup-1.237
RPM build errors:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BcCG7w: line 41: cd: console-setup-1.237: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BcCG7w (%prep)]: [This snippet shows why the build failed.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the source directory can't be entered. This may happen for example during the update of the package to new upstream release when the upstream changed the format of the source directory from %{name}-%{version} to %{name}.
Resolution: Check the source tarball and make sure that %setup macro uses correct name of the source directory in %prep. Use '-n' %setup option if the default name doesn't work and you need to use customized one.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ cd console-setup-1.237
RPM build errors:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BcCG7w: line 41: cd: console-setup-1.237: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BcCG7w (%prep)

Answer: This snippet shows why the build failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-1.fc40.ppc64le.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289
    absolute symlink: /usr/bin/clang-format-diff -> /usr/share/clang/clang-format-diff.py
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-1.fc40.ppc64le.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289]: [These files are installed in %{buildroot} but not packaged via %files.]


Answer: Issue: Several files are installed but not packaged. This is an error in an RPM build process.
Resolution: Either remove the files from the final %{buildroot} or package them by adding them in the %files section.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-1.fc40.ppc64le.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289
    absolute symlink: /usr/bin/clang-format-diff -> /usr/share/clang/clang-format-diff.py
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-1.fc40.ppc64le.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289

Answer: These files are installed in %{buildroot} but not packaged via %files.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [lisp/progmodes/elisp-mode-tests.log:
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-co-located-default
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-el
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-implicit-generic
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-no-default
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-separate-default
make[2]: *** [Makefile:348: check-doit] Error 2]: [This snippet displays why the build failed - since the building process incorporates some tests, when those tests fail, the build fails as well. ]


Answer: Issue: This package follows commits on Emacs master repository. This means that breakages to some functionality is expected. Build failed because some tests failed.
Resolution: In this case, either update failing tests in upstream, fix the cause of those text failing, wait for someone to fix those tests and build package with newer commit or just disable those tests via package if core functionality stays intact.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
lisp/progmodes/elisp-mode-tests.log:
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-co-located-default
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-el
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-implicit-generic
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-no-default
   FAILED  xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-separate-default
make[2]: *** [Makefile:348: check-doit] Error 2

Answer: This snippet displays why the build failed - since the building process incorporates some tests, when those tests fail, the build fails as well.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [01:12:39             out:         "cmd": "subscription-manager register --username=csapps-tmt-tests --password=csapps-tmt@tests --force\n",
01:12:39             out:         "delta": "0:00:00.451704",
01:12:39             out:         "end": "2024-07-14 21:14:31.721485",
01:12:39             out:         "failed": true,
01:12:39             out:         "msg": "non-zero return code",
01:12:39             out:         "rc": 70,
01:12:39             out:         "start": "2024-07-14 21:14:31.269781",
01:12:39             out:         "stderr": "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):\n<html><13>\n<head><title>400 The SSL certificate error</title></head><13>\n<body><13>\n<center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center><13>\n<center>The SSL certificate error</center><13>\n<hr><center>openresty</center><13>\n</body><13>\n</html><13>",
01:12:39             out:         "stderr_lines": [
01:12:39             out:             "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):",
01:12:39             out:             "<html><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<head><title>400 The SSL certificate error</title></head><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<body><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<center>The SSL certificate error</center><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<hr><center>openresty</center><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "</body><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "</html><13>"
01:12:39             out:         ],
01:12:39             out:         "stdout": "Unregistering from: subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com:443/subscription",
01:12:39             out:         "stdout_lines": [
01:12:39             out:             "Unregistering from: subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com:443/subscription"
01:12:39             out:         ]]: [Subscription to RHEL8, RHEL9 done by subscription failed.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because a connection to subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com was not possible.
Resolution: Check if the connection to subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com is not broken on Slack #ethel
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
01:12:39             out:         "cmd": "subscription-manager register --username=csapps-tmt-tests --password=csapps-tmt@tests --force\n",
01:12:39             out:         "delta": "0:00:00.451704",
01:12:39             out:         "end": "2024-07-14 21:14:31.721485",
01:12:39             out:         "failed": true,
01:12:39             out:         "msg": "non-zero return code",
01:12:39             out:         "rc": 70,
01:12:39             out:         "start": "2024-07-14 21:14:31.269781",
01:12:39             out:         "stderr": "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):\n<html><13>\n<head><title>400 The SSL certificate error</title></head><13>\n<body><13>\n<center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center><13>\n<center>The SSL certificate error</center><13>\n<hr><center>openresty</center><13>\n</body><13>\n</html><13>",
01:12:39             out:         "stderr_lines": [
01:12:39             out:             "Unknown server reply (HTTP error code 400: Bad Request):",
01:12:39             out:             "<html><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<head><title>400 The SSL certificate error</title></head><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<body><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<center><h1>400 Bad Request</h1></center><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<center>The SSL certificate error</center><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "<hr><center>openresty</center><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "</body><13>",
01:12:39             out:             "</html><13>"
01:12:39             out:         ],
01:12:39             out:         "stdout": "Unregistering from: subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com:443/subscription",
01:12:39             out:         "stdout_lines": [
01:12:39             out:             "Unregistering from: subscription.rhsm.stage.redhat.com:443/subscription"
01:12:39             out:         ]

Answer: Subscription to RHEL8, RHEL9 done by subscription failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc40.aarch64.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254]: [Multiple files were installed without being properly packaged.]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M cac224eb299c4915b55fa38e88e01f49 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-40-aarch64-1733451703.194948/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.kr97w98o:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target aarch64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/llvm.spec']: [Final error, the build command itself failed. This is not helpful for diagnosis of the root cause.]


Answer: Issue: Some files were not properly packaged, but they were still installed, this is unacceptable for multiple security reasons.
Resolution: Ensure that all files installed by the package are tracked in the spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadAPI.h
   /usr/include/offload/OffloadPrint.hpp
   /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254-20.0.0~pre20241206.g1a896049018254-1.fc40.aarch64.debug
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so
   /usr/lib64/libLLVMOffload.so.20.0pre20241206.g1a896049018254

Answer: Multiple files were installed without being properly packaged.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M cac224eb299c4915b55fa38e88e01f49 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-40-aarch64-1733451703.194948/root -a -u mockbuild --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.kr97w98o:/etc/resolv.conf --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control --bind=/dev/fuse --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1 --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4 --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7 --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10 --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb  --target aarch64 --nodeps /builddir/build/originals/llvm.spec'

Answer: Final error, the build command itself failed. This is not helpful for diagnosis of the root cause.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
gmake[2]: *** [intern/cycles/kernel/CMakeFiles/cycles_kernel_hip.dir/build.make:402: intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_gfx1010.fatbin] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/redhat-linux-build'

Answer: The issue seems impacting HIP for Cycles Rendering Engine using AMD hardware
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 Building CXX object extern/ceres/CMakeFiles/extern_ceres.dir/internal/ceres/linear_solver.cc.o
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/redhat-linux-build/extern/ceres && /usr/bin/ccache /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -DGFLAGS_DLL_DECL="" -DGFLAGS_DLL_DECLARE_FLAG="" -DGFLAGS_DLL_DEFINE_FLAG="" -DGOOGLE_GLOG_DLL_DECL="" -DHAVE_EXECINFO_H -DNDEBUG -DWITH_ASSERT_ABORT -DWITH_GHOST_WAYLAND_LIBDECOR -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D__LITTLE_ENDIAN__ -I/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/extern/ceres -I/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/extern/ceres/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/extern/ceres/internal -I/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/extern/ceres/config -isystem /usr/include/eigen3 -isystem /builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/extern/gflags/src -isystem /builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/extern/glog/include -Wuninitialized  -Wall -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-sign-compare -Wlogical-op -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wno-div-by-zero -Wtype-limits  -Wno-char-subscripts -Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wpointer-arith    -Wcomma-subscript -Wformat-signedness -Wrestrict -Wno-suggest-override -Wuninitialized -Wno-stringop-overread -Wno-stringop-overflow -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5   -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang  -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -Wl,--as-needed -march=x86-64-v2 -fopenmp -pipe -fPIC -funsigned-char -fno-strict-aliasing -ffp-contract=off -fmacro-prefix-map="/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/"="" -fmacro-prefix-map="/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/redhat-linux-build/"=""  -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused-function -Wno-type-limits -Wno-int-in-bool-context -Wno-switch -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-implicit-fallthrough -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable  -Wno-class-memaccess -Wno-comment -Wno-unused-local-typedefs -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -MD -MT extern/ceres/CMakeFiles/extern_ceres.dir/internal/ceres/linear_solver.cc.o -MF CMakeFiles/extern_ceres.dir/internal/ceres/linear_solver.cc.o.d -o CMakeFiles/extern_ceres.dir/internal/ceres/linear_solver.cc.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/extern/ceres/internal/ceres/linear_solver.cc
clang++: error: unknown argument: '--genco'

Answer: --genco parameter unrecognized for clang++
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [State.xs:4576:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘nvtime’; expected 0, have 1
 4576 |         RETVAL = nvtime (aTHX);]: [compilation error stating invalid number of arguments was supplied]


Answer: Issue: Binaries cannot be compiled
Resolution: Check that correct flags were used and function 'nvtime' as defined in supplied header file
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
State.xs:4576:18: error: too many arguments to function ‘nvtime’; expected 0, have 1
 4576 |         RETVAL = nvtime (aTHX);

Answer: compilation error stating invalid number of arguments was supplied
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [FAILED test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py::TestConnectionPoolTimeouts::test_timeout_float
FAILED test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py::TestConnectionPool::test_socket_timeout_updated_on_reuse_parameter[timeout2-expect_settimeout_calls2]
FAILED test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py::TestConnectionPool::test_socket_timeout_updated_on_reuse_parameter[timeout3-expect_settimeout_calls3]
= 3 failed, 1417 passed, 504 skipped, 4 deselected, 84 warnings in 396.38s (0:06:36) =]: [The error message indicates that three tests failed during a test execution. The specific tests that failed were:

- test_timeout_float in test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py
- test_socket_timeout_updated_on_reuse_parameter[timeout2-expect_settimeout_calls2] in test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py
- test_socket_timeout_updated_on_reuse_parameter[timeout3-expect_settimeout_calls3] in test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py]


Answer: Issue: The test suite for your package failed. The `= 3 failed, 1417 passed, 504 skipped, 4 deselected, 84 warnings in 396.38s (0:06:36) =` part of the message summarizes the overall results of the test execution. It states that 3 tests failed, 1417 tests passed, 504 tests were skipped, 4 tests were deselected, and 84 warnings were issued. The overall execution time was 396.38 seconds (6 minutes and 36 seconds).
Resolution: You should resolve the test failures, ideally work with the upstream community.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
FAILED test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py::TestConnectionPoolTimeouts::test_timeout_float
FAILED test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py::TestConnectionPool::test_socket_timeout_updated_on_reuse_parameter[timeout2-expect_settimeout_calls2]
FAILED test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py::TestConnectionPool::test_socket_timeout_updated_on_reuse_parameter[timeout3-expect_settimeout_calls3]
= 3 failed, 1417 passed, 504 skipped, 4 deselected, 84 warnings in 396.38s (0:06:36) =

Answer: The error message indicates that three tests failed during a test execution. The specific tests that failed were:

- test_timeout_float in test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py
- test_socket_timeout_updated_on_reuse_parameter[timeout2-expect_settimeout_calls2] in test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py
- test_socket_timeout_updated_on_reuse_parameter[timeout3-expect_settimeout_calls3] in test/with_dummyserver/test_connectionpool.py
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
 CMake Error: CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER not set, after EnableLanguage
  -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!

Answer: The variable CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER was not set during invocation of the cmake. This caused configuration to be incomplete.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
  Ã Building wheel for CMGDB (pyproject.toml) did not run successfully.
  â exit code: 1
  â°â> See above for output.

Answer: General message, explaining that wheel build of the package failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [error: Patch number not specified: %patch -p1 -b .buil]: [Patch cannot be expanded because it is not precisely selected.]


Answer: Issue: A patch is expected to be expanded in the %prep section via `%patch -p1 -b .build`.
Resolution: Select the proper patch by appending index to the `%patch` statement.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
error: Patch number not specified: %patch -p1 -b .buil

Answer: Patch cannot be expanded because it is not precisely selected.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [=========== 2836 failed, 2137 passed, 1 warning in 769.57s (0:12:49) ===========
]: [2836 pytest tests have failed]
=============
[+ /usr/bin/pytest]: [pytest is invoked as part of the RPM build process inside the %check section]


Answer: Issue: The build runs a test suite as part of its build process and that test suite has failed.
Resolution: The perfect solution is to resolve all test failures.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
=========== 2836 failed, 2137 passed, 1 warning in 769.57s (0:12:49) ===========


Answer: 2836 pytest tests have failed
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/pytest

Answer: pytest is invoked as part of the RPM build process inside the %check section
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Error:
ActionText::JobRenderTest#test_uses_app_default_url_options:
ActionView::Template::Error: Can't resolve image into URL: undefined method 'to_model' for an instance of ActiveStorage::VariantWithRecord
    app/jobs/broadcast_job.rb:5:in 'BroadcastJob#perform'

bin/test /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-actiontext-8.0.1-build/actiontext-8.0.1/usr/share/gems/gems/actiontext-8.0.1/test/integration/job_render_test.rb:8
]: [This is the relevant failed test case.]


Answer: Issue: The test suite executed in `%check` section failed to pass
Resolution: This might be "random" failure caused by test execution order. First try to re-run the build.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Error:
ActionText::JobRenderTest#test_uses_app_default_url_options:
ActionView::Template::Error: Can't resolve image into URL: undefined method 'to_model' for an instance of ActiveStorage::VariantWithRecord
    app/jobs/broadcast_job.rb:5:in 'BroadcastJob#perform'

bin/test /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-actiontext-8.0.1-build/actiontext-8.0.1/usr/share/gems/gems/actiontext-8.0.1/test/integration/job_render_test.rb:8


Answer: This is the relevant failed test case.