fedora-copr/log_detective_qna huggingface dataset:
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [>>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.x]: [dnf failed to download repo metadata]
=============
[ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M ed79c598e23c4d7893f15d7d1a1ac8b1 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le-bootstrap-1746176841.800284/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.wa0z7hd8:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le-1746176841.800284/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le-1746176841.800284/root/ --releasever 43 install @buildsys-build --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts]: [There seems to be something wrong with the machine that executed the build]


Answer: Issue: DNF failed to download repo metadata. It resulted in a build failure
Resolution: This error seems unrelated to your changes and your component. Try to rebuild.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
>>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.x

Answer: dnf failed to download repo metadata
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M ed79c598e23c4d7893f15d7d1a1ac8b1 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le-bootstrap-1746176841.800284/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.wa0z7hd8:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le-1746176841.800284/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le-1746176841.800284/root/ --releasever 43 install @buildsys-build --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

Answer: There seems to be something wrong with the machine that executed the build
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
    def send_open(self, payload, channel=None, **kwargs):
        if channel is None:
            channel = self.get_id('channel')
>       self.send_json('', command='open', channel=channel, payload=payload, **kwargs)
E       TypeError: MockTransport.send_json() got multiple values for argument 'channel'

Answer: `TypeError` was identified for call to `send_json` method.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
self = <test.pytest.mocktransport.MockTransport object at 0xffffb2cb4c50>
payload = 'fsread1', channel = 'channel.1'
kwargs = {'binary': 'raw', 'path': '/dev/null'}

    def send_open(self, payload, channel=None, **kwargs):
        if channel is None:
            channel = self.get_id('channel')
>       self.send_json('', command='open', channel=channel, payload=payload, **kwargs)
E       TypeError: MockTransport.send_json() got multiple values for argument 'channel'

test/pytest/mocktransport.py:48: TypeError

Answer: `TypeError` was identified for call to `send_json` method.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted]: [DNF error message about a missing package]


Answer: Issue: The package python3-pytest-twisted is not available in the requested build root.
Resolution: Add the missing package to the targeted distribution.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: python3-pytest-twisted

Answer: DNF error message about a missing package
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CC=clang

Answer: clang has been selected as the default C compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CXX=clang++

Answer: clang++ has been selected as the default C++ compiler.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/CMakeTestCCompiler.cmake:67 (message):
  The C compiler

    "/usr/bin/clang"

  is not able to compile a simple test program.

  It fails with the following output:

    Change Dir: '/builddir/build/BUILD/pocl-7.0-build/pocl-7.0/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeScratch/TryCompile-oIny7z'
    
    Run Build Command(s): /usr/bin/ninja-build -v cmTC_fc265
    [1/2] /usr/bin/clang   -O2 -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg -fstack-protector-strong   -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -MD -MT CMakeFiles/cmTC_fc265.dir/testCCompiler.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/cmTC_fc265.dir/testCCompiler.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/cmTC_fc265.dir/testCCompiler.c.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/pocl-7.0-build/pocl-7.0/redhat-linux-build/CMakeFiles/CMakeScratch/TryCompile-oIny7z/testCCompiler.c
    [2/2] : && /usr/bin/clang -O2 -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg -fstack-protector-strong   -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfg  -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,--build-id=sha1 CMakeFiles/cmTC_fc265.dir/testCCompiler.c.o -o cmTC_fc265   && :
    FAILED: cmTC_fc265 
    : && /usr/bin/clang -O2 -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang.cfg -fstack-protector-strong   -m64 -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfg  -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,--build-id=sha1 CMakeFiles/cmTC_fc265.dir/testCCompiler.c.o -o cmTC_fc265   && :
    /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/../lib/LLVMgold.so: error loading plugin: /usr/bin/../lib/LLVMgold.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
    ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

Answer: This is the error message that describes the failure.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'codeready-builder':
  - Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel9/9/x86_64/codeready-builder/os/repodata/aef1905e-11d3-4830-b6a6-5791aeadff2e (IP: 23.1.8.251)
  - Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel9/9/x86_64/codeready-builder/os/repodata/bf8e974a00fc5eebc8644ccc7f0dc4f3780d661576f0e315ae7d818b4c390599-comps.xml (IP: 23.1.8.251)
  - Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel9/9/x86_64/codeready-builder/os/repodata/990909ebf3638efa84b4a0629871ef2dd8fed203349f2dc383048cfb903c51a4-updateinfo.xml.gz (IP: 23.1.8.251)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'codeready-builder': Yum repo downloading error: Downloading error(s): repodata/bf8e974a00fc5eebc8644ccc7f0dc4f3780d661576f0e315ae7d818b4c390599-comps.xml - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success; repodata/aef1905e-11d3-4830-b6a6-5791aeadff2e - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success; repodata/990909ebf3638efa84b4a0629871ef2dd8fed203349f2dc383048cfb903c51a4-updateinfo.xml.gz - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success]: [error during environment setup]


Answer: Issue: It was not possible to set up the environment, probably a network flake
Resolution: Retry manually (probably a flake), or report the issue to the Copr team.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'codeready-builder':
  - Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel9/9/x86_64/codeready-builder/os/repodata/aef1905e-11d3-4830-b6a6-5791aeadff2e (IP: 23.1.8.251)
  - Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel9/9/x86_64/codeready-builder/os/repodata/bf8e974a00fc5eebc8644ccc7f0dc4f3780d661576f0e315ae7d818b4c390599-comps.xml (IP: 23.1.8.251)
  - Status code: 403 for https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/rhel9/9/x86_64/codeready-builder/os/repodata/990909ebf3638efa84b4a0629871ef2dd8fed203349f2dc383048cfb903c51a4-updateinfo.xml.gz (IP: 23.1.8.251)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'codeready-builder': Yum repo downloading error: Downloading error(s): repodata/bf8e974a00fc5eebc8644ccc7f0dc4f3780d661576f0e315ae7d818b4c390599-comps.xml - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success; repodata/aef1905e-11d3-4830-b6a6-5791aeadff2e - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success; repodata/990909ebf3638efa84b4a0629871ef2dd8fed203349f2dc383048cfb903c51a4-updateinfo.xml.gz - Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success

Answer: error during environment setup
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
A]: [Build failure reason.]


Answer: Issue: The bash-completion package is required for the build process, but missing.
Resolution: Add BuildRequire: bash-completion to your .spec file.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
A

Answer: Build failure reason.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [+ /usr/bin/patch -p2 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|From f4881bd81a71b3a08814fc2ff2a7da3153e0c5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20Men=C5=A1=C3=ADk?= <copr-team@redhat.com>
|Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:55:10 +0100
|Subject: [PATCH] Add unbound members group access to control key
|
|Recent openssl genrsa does not use umask for generated keys. There is no
|strong reason why every member of unbound group should be able read
|server key. But control key would be quite useful to be group readable
|and to allow control access to whole group. Allowing access to control
|by group membership, not via sudo.
|---
| smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in | 3 ++-
| 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
|diff --git a/smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in b/smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in
|index 4a358f6bd..c2a79a242 100644
|--- a/smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in
|+++ b/smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored]: [Patch tries to apply with -p2, but contents of the patch seems to be done for -p1]
=============
[~/build/BUILD/unbound-1.20.0/unbound-1.20.0 ~/build/BUILD/unbound-1.20.0
+ pushd unbound-1.20.0]: [Shows pushd path, which contains nested unbound-1.20.0 directory in the directory with the same name already.]


Answer: Issue: Patch did not find the the target file in extracted source path, because the source is extracted into extra subdirectory.
Resolution: Recreate the patch to have correct prefix stripped from the path of patched file. It has to include also the created subdirectory.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
+ /usr/bin/patch -p2 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|From f4881bd81a71b3a08814fc2ff2a7da3153e0c5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20Men=C5=A1=C3=ADk?= <copr-team@redhat.com>
|Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:55:10 +0100
|Subject: [PATCH] Add unbound members group access to control key
|
|Recent openssl genrsa does not use umask for generated keys. There is no
|strong reason why every member of unbound group should be able read
|server key. But control key would be quite useful to be group readable
|and to allow control access to whole group. Allowing access to control
|by group membership, not via sudo.
|---
| smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in | 3 ++-
| 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
|diff --git a/smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in b/smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in
|index 4a358f6bd..c2a79a242 100644
|--- a/smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in
|+++ b/smallapp/unbound-control-setup.sh.in
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Answer: Patch tries to apply with -p2, but contents of the patch seems to be done for -p1
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
~/build/BUILD/unbound-1.20.0/unbound-1.20.0 ~/build/BUILD/unbound-1.20.0
+ pushd unbound-1.20.0

Answer: Shows pushd path, which contains nested unbound-1.20.0 directory in the directory with the same name already.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(gsettings-desktop-schemas) >= 47
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1
]: [DNF tries to install build dependencies, but the requirements cannot be resolved.]


Answer: Issue: The build requires `pkgconfig(gsettings-desktop-schemas)` in version equal to or higher than 47. But such package is not available.
Resolution: First identify which package provides this virtual provides:

```
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'pkgconfig(gsettings-desktop-schemas)'
gsettings-desktop-schemas-devel-47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
```

Then either contact the maintainer of this package to provide a newer release or you have to relax your dependencies on this package.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459:  No match for argument: pkgconfig(gsettings-desktop-schemas) >= 47
DEBUG util.py:459:  You can try to add to command line:
DEBUG util.py:459:    --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
DEBUG util.py:608:  Child return code was: 1


Answer: DNF tries to install build dependencies, but the requirements cannot be resolved.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [             In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/dotnet-v9.0.0-preview.4.24266.19-x64-bootstrap/src/runtime/src/native/libs/System.Native/pal_errno.c:4:
             In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/dotnet-v9.0.0-preview.4.24266.19-x64-bootstrap/src/runtime/src/native/libs/System.Native/pal_errno.h:6:
             In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/dotnet-v9.0.0-preview.4.24266.19-x64-bootstrap/src/runtime/src/native/libs/Common/pal_error_common.h:9:
             /builddir/build/BUILD/dotnet-v9.0.0-preview.4.24266.19-x64-bootstrap/src/runtime/src/native/libs/Common/pal_utilities.h:59:5: error: 'snprintf' was marked unused but was used [-Werror,-Wused-but-marked-unused]
                59 |     snprintf(destination, destinationSize, "%s", source);
                   |     ^]: [It shows the exact compiler error that makes the build fail.]


Answer: Issue: The compiler produced an error.
Resolution: Fix the error. If the error was actually a warning promoted to an error, you might consider turn off the specific warning.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
             In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/dotnet-v9.0.0-preview.4.24266.19-x64-bootstrap/src/runtime/src/native/libs/System.Native/pal_errno.c:4:
             In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/dotnet-v9.0.0-preview.4.24266.19-x64-bootstrap/src/runtime/src/native/libs/System.Native/pal_errno.h:6:
             In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/dotnet-v9.0.0-preview.4.24266.19-x64-bootstrap/src/runtime/src/native/libs/Common/pal_error_common.h:9:
             /builddir/build/BUILD/dotnet-v9.0.0-preview.4.24266.19-x64-bootstrap/src/runtime/src/native/libs/Common/pal_utilities.h:59:5: error: 'snprintf' was marked unused but was used [-Werror,-Wused-but-marked-unused]
                59 |     snprintf(destination, destinationSize, "%s", source);
                   |     ^

Answer: It shows the exact compiler error that makes the build fail.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [18:27.43 /usr/bin/ld: ../../../aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/libgkrust.a(gkrust-7c8ad0d5300b0bcd.gkrust.bae776efe2600cfd-cgu.0.rcgu.o): unrecognized relocation type 0x13b in section `.rodata..Lswitch.table._ZN14neqo_transport10connection10Connection10input_path17ha24e607b9a379769E.11502.rel'
18:27.43 /usr/bin/ld: is this version of the linker - version 2.44-3.fc43 - out of date ?
18:27.43 /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
18:28.11 collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status]: [ld linker error ]


Answer: Issue: During cargo linking gkrust the ld linker on aarch64 encountered an unrecognized relocation type 0x13b. It suggests the linker version is too old. This appears to be https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141737 for which in llvm lld R_AARCH64_GOTPCREL32 support was implemented and unnamed_addr was dropped to avoid generating GOTPCREL relocations.
Resolution: Wait for an update to LLVM 20.1.7
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
18:27.43 /usr/bin/ld: ../../../aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/libgkrust.a(gkrust-7c8ad0d5300b0bcd.gkrust.bae776efe2600cfd-cgu.0.rcgu.o): unrecognized relocation type 0x13b in section `.rodata..Lswitch.table._ZN14neqo_transport10connection10Connection10input_path17ha24e607b9a379769E.11502.rel'
18:27.43 /usr/bin/ld: is this version of the linker - version 2.44-3.fc43 - out of date ?
18:27.43 /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
18:28.11 collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Answer: ld linker error
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [#   Failed test 'use Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema;'
#   at t/01use.t line 4.
#     Tried to use 'Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema'.
#     Error:  Can't locate object method "meta" via package "MooseX::Types::LoadableClass" at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MooseX/Types/LoadableClass.pm line 39.
# Compilation failed in require at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66-build/Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66/blib/lib/Catalyst/Model/DBIC/Schema/Types.pm line 11.
# BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66-build/Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66/blib/lib/Catalyst/Model/DBIC/Schema/Types.pm line 11.
# Compilation failed in require at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66-build/Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66/blib/lib/Catalyst/Model/DBIC/Schema.pm line 18.
# BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66-build/Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66/blib/lib/Catalyst/Model/DBIC/Schema.pm line 18.
# Compilation failed in require at t/01use.t line 4.
# BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/01use.t line 4.]: [The t/01use.t test failed because MooseX::Types::LoadableClass Perl classs was unable to invoke meta() method.]


Answer: Issue: MooseX::Types::LoadableClass inherits from MooseX::Types and invokes the meta () method. The method was provided by MooseX::Types until 0.51 version.
Resolution: Upgrade perl-MooseX-Types-LoadableClass RPM package to 0.16 version which removed the unnecessary call to meta() method.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
#   Failed test 'use Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema;'
#   at t/01use.t line 4.
#     Tried to use 'Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema'.
#     Error:  Can't locate object method "meta" via package "MooseX::Types::LoadableClass" at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MooseX/Types/LoadableClass.pm line 39.
# Compilation failed in require at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66-build/Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66/blib/lib/Catalyst/Model/DBIC/Schema/Types.pm line 11.
# BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66-build/Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66/blib/lib/Catalyst/Model/DBIC/Schema/Types.pm line 11.
# Compilation failed in require at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66-build/Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66/blib/lib/Catalyst/Model/DBIC/Schema.pm line 18.
# BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /builddir/build/BUILD/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66-build/Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.66/blib/lib/Catalyst/Model/DBIC/Schema.pm line 18.
# Compilation failed in require at t/01use.t line 4.
# BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/01use.t line 4.

Answer: The t/01use.t test failed because MooseX::Types::LoadableClass Perl classs was unable to invoke meta() method.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M e3d332f68bbb41a6a2cfa579c9ef17a8 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1706757715.140855/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.1pqgkwq6:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706757715.140855/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706757715.140855/root/ --releasever eln --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install clang-rpm-macros clang compiler-rt libomp libomp-devel llvm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                                  28 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Additional repo https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_or  59 kB/s | 3.8 kB     00:00    
Additional repo https_download_copr_fedorainfra  99 kB/s | 3.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN BaseOS - Developmental packages fo  35 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN AppStream - Developmental packages  61 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN CodeReady Linux Builders - Build p  63 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages]: [DNF reporting a problem with dependencies. Here in particular clang-rpm-macros depends on a clang v13.0.0 which doesn't exist in the build repositories.]


Answer: Issue: Missing clang v13.0.0 in build repos.
Resolution: Provide a particular version of clang, or fix clang-rpm-macros so it doesn't strictly require the version 13.0.0 but that "any version" is enough.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 

 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M e3d332f68bbb41a6a2cfa579c9ef17a8 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1706757715.140855/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.1pqgkwq6:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706757715.140855/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1706757715.140855/root/ --releasever eln --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install clang-rpm-macros clang compiler-rt libomp libomp-devel llvm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock
Copr repository                                  28 kB/s | 1.5 kB     00:00    
Additional repo https_kojipkgs_fedoraproject_or  59 kB/s | 3.8 kB     00:00    
Additional repo https_download_copr_fedorainfra  99 kB/s | 3.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN BaseOS - Developmental packages fo  35 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN AppStream - Developmental packages  61 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Fedora - ELN CodeReady Linux Builders - Build p  63 kB/s | 2.3 kB     00:00    
Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides clang = 13.0.0 needed by clang-rpm-macros-1-136.el115.noarch from https_download_copr_fedorainfracloud_org_results_fedora_llvm_team_clang_rpm_macros_fedora_releasever_basearch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages

Answer: DNF reporting a problem with dependencies. Here in particular clang-rpm-macros depends on a clang v13.0.0 which doesn't exist in the build repositories.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BzGvir: line 49: /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress: No such file or directory
]: [There is no rpmuncompress command used for uncompress source codes.]


Answer: Issue: Because there is no rpmuncompress command used to uncompress source files during prepare build phase.
Resolution: A rpm spec file should be fixed to use standard setup or use standard tools available for target distribution.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BzGvir: line 49: /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress: No such file or directory


Answer: There is no rpmuncompress command used for uncompress source codes.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 198, in _run_module_as_main
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/__main__.py", line 6, in <module>
    run()
    ~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/run.py", line 20, in run
    result = main(sys.argv[1:] if args is None else args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/run.py", line 42, in main
    result = provision(state)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/provision.py", line 87, in provision
    MANAGER.tox_add_core_config(state.conf.core, state)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/plugin/manager.py", line 81, in tox_add_core_config
    self.manager.hook.tox_add_core_config(core_conf=core_conf, state=state)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_hooks.py", line 513, in __call__
    return self._hookexec(self.name, self._hookimpls.copy(), kwargs, firstresult)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_manager.py", line 120, in _hookexec
    return self._inner_hookexec(hook_name, methods, kwargs, firstresult)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 139, in _multicall
    raise exception.with_traceback(exception.__traceback__)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 103, in _multicall
    res = hook_impl.function(*args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox_current_env/hooks4.py", line 82, in tox_add_core_config
    raise LookupError(
    ...<4 lines>...
    )
LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.]: [The snippet shows LookupError for missing tox configuration.]


Answer: Issue: The specfile contains %tox macro, but there is not tox.ini file in the sources.
Resolution: Use another way how to run the tests in the specfile instead %tox (e.g. pytest).
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 198, in _run_module_as_main
  File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/__main__.py", line 6, in <module>
    run()
    ~~~^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/run.py", line 20, in run
    result = main(sys.argv[1:] if args is None else args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/run.py", line 42, in main
    result = provision(state)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/provision.py", line 87, in provision
    MANAGER.tox_add_core_config(state.conf.core, state)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox/plugin/manager.py", line 81, in tox_add_core_config
    self.manager.hook.tox_add_core_config(core_conf=core_conf, state=state)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_hooks.py", line 513, in __call__
    return self._hookexec(self.name, self._hookimpls.copy(), kwargs, firstresult)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_manager.py", line 120, in _hookexec
    return self._inner_hookexec(hook_name, methods, kwargs, firstresult)
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 139, in _multicall
    raise exception.with_traceback(exception.__traceback__)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 103, in _multicall
    res = hook_impl.function(*args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/tox_current_env/hooks4.py", line 82, in tox_add_core_config
    raise LookupError(
    ...<4 lines>...
    )
LookupError: tox configuration not found. To use tox, please ensure tox configuration is located in current directory (in tox.ini, setup.cfg, pyproject.toml, or tox.toml). See https://tox.wiki/en/latest/config.html for details.

Answer: The snippet shows LookupError for missing tox configuration.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [============================================================================
Testsuite summary for Varnish 7.6.1
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 877
# PASS:  813
# SKIP:  25
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  39
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================]: [It show that tests from the testsuite actually failed. ]


Answer: Issue: The build failed because the patch varnish-7.6.1-CVE-2025-47905.patch wasn't correctly backported. 
Resolution: Backport upstream fixes for CVE-2025-47905 correctly so tests from the upstream testsuite are not failing.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for Varnish 7.6.1
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 877
# PASS:  813
# SKIP:  25
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  39
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================

Answer: It show that tests from the testsuite actually failed.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [type=AVC msg=audit(1747430234.032:32866): avc:  denied  { read } for  pid=718312 comm="rc" name="pmproxy" dev="xvda3" ino=503324563 scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:pcp_log_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file permissive=1]: [Selinux issue]


Answer: Issue: pmproxy tried to open a device which was not allowed in pcp-selinux policy
Resolution: pcp-selinux needs to update its selinux rules to be able to access xvda3 device
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
type=AVC msg=audit(1747430234.032:32866): avc:  denied  { read } for  pid=718312 comm="rc" name="pmproxy" dev="xvda3" ino=503324563 scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:pcp_log_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file permissive=1

Answer: Selinux issue
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pkgconf-pkg-config-2.3.0-1.fc42.aarch64" is already installed.
Problem: cannot install both gcc-15.0.0-0.2.fc42.aarch64 from https_dmalcolm_fedorapeople_org_gcc_gcc_15_mass_prebuild_arch and gcc-14.2.1-6.fc42.aarch64 from fedora
  - package libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64 from fedora requires gcc(major) = 14, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates]: [Package `libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64` has an unmet dependency on `gcc(major) = 14`.]


Answer: Issue: Package manager was unable to resolve all dependencies.
Resolution: Verify dependencies of `libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64` if they are indeed available in repositories installed. If not, you can change constraints on the dependency, or provide missing indirect dependency in the repos.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Package "pkgconf-pkg-config-2.3.0-1.fc42.aarch64" is already installed.
Problem: cannot install both gcc-15.0.0-0.2.fc42.aarch64 from https_dmalcolm_fedorapeople_org_gcc_gcc_15_mass_prebuild_arch and gcc-14.2.1-6.fc42.aarch64 from fedora
  - package libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64 from fedora requires gcc(major) = 14, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
  --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates

Answer: Package `libtool-2.5.4-1.fc42.aarch64` has an unmet dependency on `gcc(major) = 14`.
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.

  Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.

  Snippets are delimited with '================'.

  Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.

  Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.

  Snippets:

  [Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf5
Updating and loading repositories:
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
Updating and loading repositories:
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
Updating and loading repositories:]: [It indicates network issues while attempting to install a minimal buildroot with dnf5.]
=============
[ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-b5v4itya/llvm/llvm.spec) Config(fedora-rawhide-ppc64le) 0 minutes 36 seconds]: [It indicates an error right after trying to install a minimal buildroot with dnf5.]


Answer: Issue: The build failed due to a network issue with the server that is running the build.
Resolution: Restart the build. If the build continues to fail, report this issue to Copr admins in order to investigate a possible infrastructure issue.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf5
Updating and loading repositories:
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
Updating and loading repositories:
WARNING: DNF5 command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
Updating and loading repositories:

Answer: It indicates network issues while attempting to install a minimal buildroot with dnf5.
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.            
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet: 
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-b5v4itya/llvm/llvm.spec) Config(fedora-rawhide-ppc64le) 0 minutes 36 seconds

Answer: It indicates an error right after trying to install a minimal buildroot with dnf5.