分类：教育/科学-外语学习
问题：CD
As American friend of mine who was high up in a big corption had worked out a way of heading a good of e-mails before most of us bad, even heard of the concept. If any information he was sent was vital enough, his back of response would ensure the sender rang himup, if thAs American friend of mine who was high up in a big corption had worked out a way of heading a good of e-mails before most of us bad, even heard of the concept. If any information he was sent was vital enough, his back of response would ensure the sender rang himup, if the sender wasn’t important enough to have his private numbers the communication couldn’t be that mportant, my friend is now even more semor in the same company so the strakegy must work. Most every week now there seems to be a ceport suggesting that we are all being driven crasy by the botter of e-mail. He this is the case, it’s only because we haven’t developed an appropriate in deating with it. Fristry. You junk nothing with an exchmation mark on a string of capital letters, or from my adders, you don’t recognive on feel confideet about. Secondly, e-mail don’t and have to be answerd. Because e-mail is so easy, there’s a trardery for cmespordence to carry on for ever, but it is permissible to stop an endiess discussion or to accept a point of information sent by a colleague without acknowleadring it.Thirdly ,a reply e-mail thoughts have to be the same length as the original . We all have e-mail pals who read long.,chatty e-mail, which are nice to receive, but who then expect an equally long reply . The chart of e-mail can consist in the single, inconuplete sentence, totally ,regardless of the of the bread of the letter meat by past . You are perfectly within the bounds of polyandrous in-responding to a marathon e-mail with a better reply. 
回答：我的一个美国的在大公司工作里的早在我们听说这个概念之前已经制定出了一套管理电子邮件的标准. 如果任何发给他的资料足够重要, 那么如果他没有迅速的回复, 发件人会知道要给他一个电话. 如果发信人没有重要到可以得到他的私人电话, 那说明信件的内容不可能会很重要. 现在我的朋友职位更高了, 所以这个标准应该还是很有用的. 几乎每个星期都有新闻报告暗示大家都要被机器批量发送的垃圾邮件弄疯了. 而他说这种事情发生只是因为我们没有制定出一种对应方式. 首先, 你们从来都不敢把那些代有一大串感叹号的全大写标题的邮件标为垃圾邮件, 也不敢删除从你不熟悉的未知地址发来的广告邮件. 其次, 电子邮件不是必须回复. 因为发电子邮件太容易了, 所以人们很容易就会将一个话题无节制的延续下去, 但是终止某个无止径的讨论或是接受了同事发来的信息时并不回信告诉他你收到了是可以接受的行为. 第三, 人们经常认为回信的长度要和来信差不多. 我们都有那些写信写的洋洋洒洒长篇大论的网友——的确, 读起来很带劲, 但是这些人经常希望收到同样长短的回信. 电子邮件的种类包括了那些只有一句干巴巴的短句的邮件, 完全可以无视传统信件的格式. 你完全可以对那些马拉松试的电子邮件作出更好的回复.