分类：教育/科学-外语学习
问题：辛苦的打了半天，请各位哥哥姐姐帮忙翻译哈,让我学习哈Oneoft 
e of the questions that is coming into focus as we face growing scarcity of resources of many kinds in the world is how to divide limited resources among countries. In the international development community, the conventional wisdom has been that the 2 billion people living ine of the questions that is coming into focus as we face growing scarcity of resources of many kinds in the world is how to divide limited resources among countries. In the international development community, the conventional wisdom has been that the 2 billion people living in poor countries could never expect to reach the standard of living that most of us in North America enjoy, simply because the world does not contain enough iron ore, protein, petroleum, and so on. At the same time, we in the United States have continued to pursue superaffluence (过分富裕) as though there were no limits on how much we could consume. We make up 6 percent of the world's people; yet we consume one-third of the world's resources.As long as the resources we consumed each year came primarily from within our own boundaries, this was largely an internal matter. But as our resources come more and more from the outside world, " outsiders "are going to have some say over the rate at which and terms under which we consume. We will no longer be able to think in terms of "our" resources and "their" resources, but only of common resources.As Americans consuming such a disproportionate share of the world's resources, we have to question whether or not we can continue our pursuit of super affluence in a world of scarcity. We are now reaching the point where we must carefully examine the presumed link between our level of well-being and the level of material goods consumed. If you have only one crust of bread and get another crust of bread, your well-being is greatly enhanced. But if you have a loaf of bread, then an additional crust of bread doesn't make that much difference. In the eyes of most of the world today, Americans have their loaf of bread and are asking for still more. People elsewhere are beginning to ask why. This is the question we're going to have to answer, whether we're trying to persuade countries to step up their exports of oil to us or trying to convince them that we ought to be permitted to maintain our share of the world fish catch.The prospect of a scarcity of, and competition for, the world's resources required that we reexamine the way in which we relate to the rest of the world. It means we find ways of cutting back on resource consumption that is dependent on the resources and cooperation of other countries. We cannot expect people in these countries to concern themselves with our worsening energy and food shortages unless we demonstrate some concern for the hunger, illiteracy and disease that are diminishing life for them.51. The writer warns Americans that _____. eirexcessiveconsumptionhascausedworldresourceexhaustion eyareconfrontedwiththeproblemofhowtoobtainmorematerialgoods eirunfairshareoftheworld'sresourcesshouldgivewaytoproperdivisionamongcountries eyhavetodiscardtheircarsforlackoffossilfuelintheworld52. According to the passage, it has long bee
回答：问题之1是进入重点，因为我们面临着越来越多的资源匮乏，许多种类在世界上是如何分配有限的资源的国家之间。在国际发展界，传统观念一直认为， 20亿人在贫穷国家无法达到预期的生活水平是我们大多数人在北美的享受，仅仅是因为世界上没有包含足够的铁矿石，蛋白质，石油等。与此同时，我们在美国继续推行superaffluence （过分富裕） ，好像没有限制多少我们可以消耗。我们弥补百分之六的世界人民，但我们消耗三分之一的世界资源。只要我们的资源消耗，每年主要来自在我们自己的国界，这主要是一个内部问题。但是，正如我们的资源来越来越多的来自外部世界的， “外人”将会有一些发言权的速度和在何种条件下，我们消耗。我们将不再能够着眼于“我们的”资源和“他们的”资源，我们只有共同的资源。随着美国人消费这种不成比例的世界的资源，我们拥有问题是：我们是否可以继续追求超级富裕的世界稀缺。我们现在达到的地步，我们必须仔细研究推定联系我们水平的福祉和水平的物资消耗。如果您只有一个面包和地壳想要获得另一地壳面包，你的幸福便会大大加强。但是，如果你有一个面包，然后额外地壳面包不使太大的差别。眼中的大多数当今世界，美国人有其面包和所要求的更多。其他地方的人开始如果要问这是为什么。这是问题，我们将不得不回答，无论是我们正在试图说服各国加强出口石油给我们，或试图说服他们，我们应该保持我们允许占世界渔获量。前景的匮乏，竞争的,世界的资源，我们需要运用重新审视的方式，（去看待）我们与世界其他地区。这意味着我们找到办法，减少对资源消耗的依赖于资源和其他国家的合作。我们不能指望这些国家人民的关心能够帮助我们日益恶化的能源和食品短缺(些什么)，除非我们显示出一定的关注，饥饿，文盲和疾病的减少对他们的生活有益。51 。作者警告美国人说， _____ 。A：他们的过度消费造成了世界资源枯竭B.它们面临的问题是如何获得更多的物质财富C他们不公平的世界的资源应该让位于国家之间适当的分工D他们不得不放弃他们的汽车由于缺乏化石燃料在世界我翻译主要以通顺为主,()内是为了语句顺畅我自己加的,文章中没有,你看看行吗