分类：教育/科学-外语学习
问题：你能帮我看一下我的这段翻译有哪些不对的地方么？谢谢。中文：设立抢 
：设立抢夺罪的立法初衷是为了评价暴力程度介于盗窃与抢劫之间的抢夺行为。公然窃取行为体现出行为人较大的主观恶性，但仅具有公然性的平和窃取行为不足以评价为抢夺行为，因此可将其归为盗窃罪并在量刑中评价行为人的主观恶性。我国刑法中盗窃罪与抢夺罪的法定刑相当，但这不意味着不应当将抢夺罪的行为特征限为非平和手段。英文：The intention of setting the plunder crime is to evaluate the behavior of plunder whose level of violence is between th：设立抢夺罪的立法初衷是为了评价暴力程度介于盗窃与抢劫之间的抢夺行为。公然窃取行为体现出行为人较大的主观恶性，但仅具有公然性的平和窃取行为不足以评价为抢夺行为，因此可将其归为盗窃罪并在量刑中评价行为人的主观恶性。我国刑法中盗窃罪与抢夺罪的法定刑相当，但这不意味着不应当将抢夺罪的行为特征限为非平和手段。英文：The intention of setting the plunder crime is to evaluate the behavior of plunder whose level of violence is between theft and robbery. Though flagrant theft is the behavior which reflects the stronger subjective evil of the perpetrator, because of its peaceful mean, it can’t be evaluated as plunder, therefore we can treat it as theft and take the subjective evil of the perpetrator into account when deciding the penalty. The fact that the statutory sentence of theft crime and plunder crime in China's criminal law is the same doesn’t mean that it is improper to define that the plunder is the violent behavior.
回答：The intentn of legislating against the crime of plunder is to consider the level of violence employed, which is less than robbery but more than theft. An act of flagrant theft necessarily involves the interaction of the perpetrator and victim in a dangerous situation; thus it indicates a more malicious intent than an ordinary non-manifest theft. As such, whether the perpetrator has the subjective intent to commit should be taken into account while giving a sentence. Based on the current situation of Chinese criminal legislation, theft and plunder are considered to be the same type of crime in terms of sentencing. This paper calls for the legislation be amended to regard the crime of plunder as essentially an act of violence.非专业翻译，仅供参考