falan42/nurse_detection huggingface dataset:
Transthoracic Echocardiography 

REASON FOR EXAM: , Coronary artery bypass surgery and aortic stenosis.,FINDINGS: , Transthoracic echocardiogram was performed of technically limited quality.  The left ventricle was normal in size and dimensions with normal LV function.  Ejection fraction was 50% to 55%.  Concentric hypertrophy noted with interventricular septum measuring 1.6 cm, posterior wall measuring 1.2 cm.  Left atrium is enlarged, measuring 4.42 cm.  Right-sided chambers are normal in size and dimensions.  Aortic root has normal diameter.,Mitral and tricuspid valve reveals annular calcification.  Fibrocalcific valve leaflets noted with adequate excursion.  Similar findings noted on the aortic valve as well with significantly adequate excursion of valve leaflets.  Atrial and ventricular septum are intact.  Pericardium is intact without any effusion.  No obvious intracardiac mass or thrombi noted.,Doppler study reveals mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation.  Severe aortic stenosis with peak velocity of 2.76 with calculated ejection fraction 50% to 55% with severe aortic stenosis.  There is also mitral stenosis.,IMPRESSION:,1.  Concentric hypertrophy of the left ventricle with left ventricular function.,2.  Moderate mitral regurgitation.,3.  Severe aortic stenosis, severe.,RECOMMENDATIONS: , Transesophageal echocardiogram is clinically warranted to assess the aortic valve area.cardiovascular / pulmonary, coronary artery bypass surgery, aortic stenosis, annular calcification, tricuspid, mitral, regurgitation, severe aortic stenosis, concentric hypertrophy, mitral regurgitation, transthoracic, echocardiogram, hypertrophy, ventricular, valve, stenosis, aortic
Ultrasound - Carotid - 2 

EXAM: , Ultrasound carotid, bilateral.,REASON FOR EXAMINATION: , Pain.,COMPARISON:,  None.,FINDINGS: , Bilateral common carotid arteries/branches demonstrate minimal, predominantly noncalcified plaquing with mild calcific plaquing in the left internal carotid artery.  There are no different colors or spectral Doppler waveform abnormalities.,PARAMETRIC DATA:,  Right CCA PSV 0.72 m/s.  Right ICA PSV is 0.595 m/s.  Right ICA EDV 0.188 m/s.  Right vertebral 0.517 m/s. Right IC/CC is 0.826. Left CCA PSV 0.571 m/s, left ICA PSV 0.598 m/s.  Left ICA EDV 0.192 m/s.  Left vertebral 0.551 m/s.  Left IC/CC is 1.047.,IMPRESSION:,1.  No evidence for clinically significant stenosis.,2.  Minimal, predominantly soft plaquing.,cardiovascular / pulmonary, carotid, cca psv, doppler, ic/cc, ica edv, ica psv, ultrasound, arteries, calcific plaquing, common carotid, internal carotid artery, spectral, stenosis, waveform, ultrasound carotid bilateral, ultrasound carotid, plaquing,
Urgent Cardiac Cath 

PROCEDURE: , Urgent cardiac catheterization with coronary angiogram.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was brought urgently to the cardiac cath lab from the emergency room with the patient being intubated with an abnormal EKG and a cardiac arrest.  The right groin was prepped and draped in usual manner.  Under 2% lidocaine anesthesia, the right femoral artery was entered.  A 6-French sheath was placed.  The patient was already on anticoagulation.  Selective coronary angiograms were then performed using a left and a 3DRC catheter.  The catheters were reviewed.  The catheters were then removed and an Angio-Seal was placed.  There was some hematoma at the cath site.,RESULTS,1.  The left main was free of disease.,2.  The left anterior descending and its branches were free of disease.,3.  The circumflex was free of disease.,4.  The right coronary artery was free of disease.  There was no gradient across the aortic valve.,IMPRESSION: , Normal coronary angiogram.,cardiovascular / pulmonary, cardiac catheterization, coronary angiogram, angiogram
Transesophageal Echocardiogram - 3 

REASON FOR EXAM: , Aortic valve replacement.  Assessment of stenotic valve.  Evaluation for thrombus on the valve.,PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:  ,Atrial valve replacement.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,  Moderate stenosis of aortic valve replacement.  Mild mitral regurgitation.  Normal left ventricular function.,PROCEDURES IN DETAIL: , The procedure was explained to the patient with risks and benefits.  The patient agreed and signed the consent form.  The patient received a total of 3 mg of Versed and 50 mcg of fentanyl for conscious sedation and pain control.  The oropharynx anesthetized with benzocaine spray and lidocaine solution.,Esophageal intubation was done with no difficulty with the second attempt.  In a semi-Fowler position, the probe was passed to transthoracic views at about 40 to 42 cm.  Multiple pictures obtained.  Assessment of the peak velocity was done later.,The probe was pulled to the mid esophageal level.  Different pictures including short-axis views of the aortic valve was done.  Extubation done with no problems and no blood on the probe.  The patient tolerated the procedure well with no immediate postprocedure complications.,INTERPRETATION: , The left atrium was mildly dilated.  No masses or thrombi were seen.  The left atrial appendage was free of thrombus.  Pulse wave interrogation showed peak velocities of 60 cm per second.,The left ventricle was normal in size and contractility with mild LVH.  EF is normal and preserved.,The right atrium and right ventricle were both normal in size.,Mitral valve showed no vegetations or prolapse.  There was mild-to-moderate regurgitation on color flow interrogation.  Aortic valve was well-seated mechanical valve, bileaflet with acoustic shadowing beyond the valve noticed.  No perivalvular leak was noticed.  There was increased velocity across the valve with peak velocity of 3.2 m/sec with calculated aortic valve area by continuity equation at 1.2 cm2 indicative of moderate aortic valve stenosis based on criteria for native heart valves.,No AIC.,Pulmonic valve was somewhat difficult to see because of acoustic shadowing from the aortic valve.  Overall showed no abnormalities.  The tricuspid valve was structurally normal.,Interatrial septum appeared to be intact, confirmed by color flow interrogation as well as agitated saline contrast study.,The aorta and aortic arch were unremarkable.  No dissection.,IMPRESSION:,1.  Mildly dilated left atrium.,2.  Mild-to-moderate regurgitation.,3.  Well-seated mechanical aortic valve with peak velocity of 3.2 m/sec and calculated valve area of 1.2 cm2 consistent with moderate aortic stenosis.  Reevaluation in two to three years with transthoracic echocardiogram will be recommended.cardiovascular / pulmonary, aortic valve replacement, stenotic valve, thrombus, stenosis, ventricular, esophageal, peak velocity, valve replacement, aortic valve, aortic, transesophageal, valve, oropharynx, atrium, interrogation, atrial, moderate,
Transesophageal Echocardiogram - 4 

PROCEDURE NOTE:,  The patient was brought to the transesophageal echo laboratory after informed consent was obtained.  The patient was seen by Anesthesia for MAC anesthesia.  The patient's posterior pharynx was anesthetized with local Cetacaine spray.  The transesophageal probe was introduced into the posterior pharynx and esophagus without difficulty.,FINDINGS: ,1.  Left ventricle is normal in size and function; ejection fraction approximately 60%.,2.  Right ventricle is normal in size and function.,3.  Left atrium and right atrium are normal in size.,4.  Mitral valve, aortic valve, tricuspid valve, and pulmonic valve with no evidence of vegetation.  Aortic valve is only minimally thickened.,5.  Mild mitral regurgitation and mild tricuspid regurgitation.,6.  No left ventricular thrombus.,7.  No pericardial effusion.,8.  There is evidence of patent foramen ovale by contrast study.,The patient tolerated the procedure well and is sent to recovery in stable condition.  He should be n.p.o. x4 hours, then liquid, then increase as tolerated.  Once his infection is cleared, he should follow up with us with regard to followup of patent foramen ovale.cardiovascular / pulmonary, ventricle, atrium, mitral valve, aortic valve, tricuspid valve, pulmonic valve, regurgitation, transesophageal probe, transesophageal echocardiogram, posterior pharynx, transesophageal, valve
Transesophageal Echocardiogram - 5 

CLINICAL INDICATIONS: , MRSA bacteremia, rule out endocarditis.  The patient has aortic stenosis.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The transesophageal echocardiogram was performed after getting verbal and a written consent signed.  Then a multiplane TEE probe was introduced into the upper esophagus, mid esophagus, lower esophagus, and stomach and multiple views were obtained.  There were no complications.  The patient's throat was numbed with Cetacaine spray and IV sedation was achieved with Versed and fentanyl.,FINDINGS:,1.  Aortic valve is thick and calcified, a severely restricted end opening and there is 0.6 x 8 mm vegetation attached to the right coronary cusp.  The peak velocity across the aortic valve was 4.6 m/sec and mean gradient was 53 mmHg and peak gradient 84 mmHg with calculated aortic valve area of 0.6 sq cm by planimetry.,2.  Mitral valve is calcified and thick.  No vegetation seen.  There is mild-to-moderate MR present.  There is mild AI present also.,3.  Tricuspid valve and pulmonary valve are structurally normal.,4.  There is a mild TR present.,5.  There is no clot seen in the left atrial appendage.  The velocity in the left atrial appendage was 0.6 m/sec.,6.  Intraatrial septum was intact.  There is no clot or mass seen.,7.  Normal LV and RV systolic function.,8.  There is thick raised calcified plaque seen in the thoracic aorta and arch.,SUMMARY:,1.  There is a 0.6 x 0.8 cm vegetation present in the aortic valve with severe aortic stenosis.  Calculated aortic valve area was 0.6 sq. cm.,2.  Normal LV systolic function.,cardiovascular / pulmonary, endocarditis, aortic stenosis, tee probe, mrsa bacteremia, transesophageal echocardiogram, aortic, echocardiogram, esophagus, vegetation, transesophageal
Transesophageal Echocardiogram - 2 

REASON FOR EXAM: , Vegetation and bacteremia.,PROCEDURE: , Transesophageal echocardiogram.,INTERPRETATION: , The procedure and its complications were explained to the patient in detail and formal consent was obtained.  The patient was brought to special procedure unit.  His throat was anesthetized with lidocaine spray.  Subsequently, 2 mg of IV Versed was given for sedation.  The patient was positioned.  Probe was introduced without any difficulty.  The patient tolerated the procedure very well.  Probe was taken out.  No complications were noted.  Findings are as mentioned below.,FINDINGS:,1.  Left ventricle has normal size and dimensions with normal function.  Ejection fraction of 60%.,2.  Left atrium and right-sided chambers were of normal size and dimensions.,3.  Left atrial appendage is clean without any clot or smoke effect.,4.  Atrial septum is intact.  Bubble study was negative.,5.  Mitral valve is structurally normal.,6.  Aortic valve reveals echodensity suggestive of vegetation.,7.  Tricuspid valve was structurally normal.,8.  Doppler reveals moderate mitral regurgitation and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation.,9.  Aorta is benign.,IMPRESSION:,1.  Normal left ventricular size and function.,2.  Echodensity involving the aortic valve suggestive of endocarditis and vegetation.,3.  Doppler study as above most pronounced being moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency.cardiovascular / pulmonary, ventricle, atrium, atrial, septum, mitral valv, aortic valve, tricuspid valve, doppler, ventricular size, transesophageal echocardiogram, severe aortic, bacteremia, transesophageal, echocardiogram, echodensity, vegetation, valve, aortic,
Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe 

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:,  Impending open heart surgery for closure of ventricular septal defect in a 4-month-old girl.,Procedures were done under general anesthesia.  The patient was already in the operating room under general anesthesia.  Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin and gentamicin was already given prior to beginning the procedures.,PROCEDURE #1:,  Insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #1: , The probe was well lubricated and with digital manipulation, was passed into the esophagus without resistance.  The probe was placed so that the larger diameter was in the anterior-posterior position during insertion.  The probe was used by the pediatric cardiologist for preoperative and postoperative diagnostic echocardiography.  At the end, it was removed without trauma and there was no blood tingeing.  It is to be noted that approximately 30 minutes after removing the cannula, I inserted a 14-French suction tube to empty the stomach and there were a few mL of blood secretions that were suctioned.  There was no overt bleeding.,PROCEDURE #2: , Attempted and unsuccessful insertion of arterial venous lines.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #2:,  Both groins were prepped and draped.  The patient was placed at 10 degrees head-up position.  A Cook 4-French double-lumen 8-cm catheter kit was opened.  Using the 21-gauge needle that comes with the kit, several attempts were made to insert central venous and then an arterial line in the left groin.  There were several successful punctures of these vessels, but I was unable to advance Seldinger wire.  After removal of the needles, the area was compressed digitally for approximately 5 minutes.  There was a small hematoma that was not growing.  Initially, the left leg was mildly mottled with prolonged capillary refill of approximately 3 seconds.  Using 1% lidocaine, I infiltrated the vessels of the groin both medial and lateral to the vascular sheath.  Further observation, the capillary refill and circulation of the left leg became more than adequate.  The O2 saturation monitor that was on the left toe functioned well throughout the procedures, from the beginning to the end.  At the end of the procedure, the circulation of the leg was intact.,cardiovascular / pulmonary, impending open heart surgery, ventricular septal defect, antibiotic prophylaxis, cefazolin, transesophageal echocardiography probe, arterial venous lines, groin, transesophageal echocardiography, echocardiography probe, insertion, transesophageal, arterial, venous, groins, echocardiography, probe
Tracheostomy Change 

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1.  Ventilator-dependent respiratory failure.,2.  Laryngeal edema.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1.  Ventilator-dependent respiratory failure.,2.  Laryngeal edema.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Tracheostomy change.  A #6 Shiley with proximal extension was changed to a #6 Shiley with proximal extension.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is a 60-year-old Caucasian female who presented to ABCD General Hospital with exacerbation of COPD and CHF.  The patient had subsequently been taken to the operating room by Department of Otolaryngology and a direct laryngoscope was performed.  The patient was noted at that time to have transglottic edema.  Biopsies were taken.  At the time of surgery, it was decided that the patient required a tracheostomy for maintenance of continued ventilation and airway protection.  The patient is currently postop day #6 and appears to be unable to be weaned from ventilator at this time and may require prolonged ventricular support.  A decision was made to perform tracheostomy change.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was seen in the Intensive Care Unit.  The patient was placed in a supine position.  The neck was then extended.  The sutures that were previously in place in the #6 Shiley with proximal extension were removed.  The patient was preoxygenated to 100%.  After several minutes, the patient was noted to have a pulse oximetry of 100%.  The IV tubing that was supporting the patient's trache was then cut.  The tracheostomy tube was then suctioned.,The inner cannula was then removed from the tracheostomy and a nasogastric tube was placed down the lumen of the tracheostomy tube as a guidewire.  The tracheostomy tube was then removed over the nasogastric tube and the operative field was suctioned.  With the guidewire in place and with adequate visualization, a new #6 Shiley with proximal extension was then passed over the nasogastric tube guidewire and carefully inserted into the trachea.  The guidewire was then removed and the inner cannula was then placed into the tracheostomy.  The patient was then reconnected to the ventilator and was noted to have normal tidal volumes.  The patient had a tidal volume of 500 and was returning 500 cc to 510 cc.  The patient continued to saturate well with saturations 99%.  The patient appeared comfortable and her vital signs were stable.  A soft trache collar was then connected to the trachesotomy.  A drain sponge was then inserted underneath the new trache site.  The patient was observed for several minutes and was found to be in no distress and continued to maintain adequate saturations and continued to return normal tidal volumes.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DISPOSITION: , The patient tolerated the procedure well.  0.25% acetic acid soaks were ordered to the drain sponge every shift.cardiovascular / pulmonary, shiley, proximal extension, ventilator-dependent, respiratory failure, laryngeal edema, tracheostomy, cannula, respiratory, laryngeal, nasogastric, edema, ventilator
Tilt Table Test - 1 

INDICATIONS: , The patient is a 22-year-old female with past medical history of syncope.  The patient is also complaining of dizziness.  She was referred here by Dr. X for tilt table.,TECHNIQUE: , Risks and benefits explained to the patient.  Consent obtained.  She was lying down on her back for 20 minutes and her blood pressure was 111/75 and heart rate 89.  She was standing up on the tilt tablet for 20 minutes and her heart rate went up to 127 and blood pressure was still in 120/80.  Then, the patient received sublingual nitroglycerin 0.4 mg.  The patient felt dizzy at that time and heart rate was in the 120 and blood pressure was 110/50.  The patient felt nauseous and felt hot at that time.  She did not pass out.,COMPLICATIONS:,  None.,Tilt table was then terminated.,SUMMARY:,  Positive tilt table for vasovagal syncope with significant increase of heart rate with minimal decrease of blood pressure.,RECOMMENDATIONS: , I recommend followup in the office in one week and she will need Toprol-XL 12.5 mg every day if symptoms persist.cardiovascular / pulmonary, vasovagal syncope, tilt table test, blood pressure, heart rate, dizziness,
Tracheotomy - 1 

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Respiratory failure.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:  ,Respiratory failure.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , Tracheotomy.,ANESTHESIA:  ,General inhalational.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room, placed supine on the operating table.  General inhalational anesthesia was administered through the patient's existing 4.0 endotracheal tube.  The neck was extended and secured with tape and incision in the midline of the neck approximately 2 fingerbreadths above the sternal notch was outlined.  The incision measured approximately 1 cm and was just below the palpable cricoid cartilage and first tracheal ring.  The incision area was infiltrated with 1% Xylocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000.  A #67 blade was used to perform the incision.  Electrocautery was used to remove excess fat tissue to expose the strap muscles.  The strap muscles were grasped and divided in the midline with a cutting electrocautery.  Sharp dissection was used to expose the anterior trachea and cricoid cartilage.  The thyroid isthmus was identified crossing just below the cricoid cartilage.  This was divided in the midline with electrocautery.  Blunt dissection was used to expose adequate cartilaginous rings.  A 4.0 silk was used for stay sutures to the midline of the cricoid.  Additional stay sutures were placed on each side of the third tracheal ring.  Thin DuoDerm was placed around the stoma.  The tracheal incision was performed with a #11 blade through the second, third, and fourth tracheal rings.  The cartilaginous edges were secured to the skin edges with interrupted #4-0 Monocryl.  A 4.5 PED tight-to-shaft cuffed Bivona tube was placed and secured with Velcro ties.  A flexible scope was passed through the tracheotomy tube.  The carina was visualized approximately 1.5 cm distal to the distal end of the tracheotomy tube.  Ventilation was confirmed.  There was good chest rise and no appreciable leak.  The procedure was terminated.  The patient was in stable condition.  Bleeding was negligible and she was transferred back to the Pediatric intensive care unit in stable condition.cardiovascular / pulmonary, bivona tube, duoderm, tracheotomy tube, respiratory failure, cricoid cartilage, tracheotomy, tracheal,
Transesophageal Echocardiogram - 1 

INDICATION: , Aortic stenosis.,PROCEDURE: , Transesophageal echocardiogram.,INTERPRETATION:  ,Procedure and complications explained to the patient in detail.  Informed consent was obtained.  The patient was anesthetized in the throat with lidocaine spray.  Subsequently, 3 mg of IV Versed was given for sedation.  The patient was positioned and transesophageal probe was introduced without any difficulty.  Images were taken.  The patient tolerated the procedure very well without any complications.  Findings as mentioned below.,FINDINGS:,1.  Left ventricle is in normal size and dimension.  Normal function.  Ejection fraction of 60%.,2.  Left atrium and right-sided chambers are of normal size and dimension.,3.  Mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonic valves are structurally normal.,4.  Aortic valve reveals annular calcification with fibrocalcific valve leaflets with decreased excursion.,5.  Left atrial appendage is clean without any clot or smoke effect.,6.  Atrial septum intact.  Study was negative.,7.  Doppler study essentially benign.,8.  Aorta essentially benign.,9.  Aortic valve planimetry valve area average about 1.3 cm2 consistent with moderate aortic stenosis.,SUMMARY:,1.  Normal left ventricular size and function.,2.  Benign Doppler flow pattern.,3.  Aortic valve area of 1.3 cm2 planimetry.,cardiovascular / pulmonary, aortic valve, ejection fraction, planimetry, ventricular, transesophageal, echocardiogram, atrial septum, septum intact, transesophageal echocardiogram, aortic stenosis, doppler, aortic, valves
Thrombectomy AV Shunt 

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Thrombosed arteriovenous shunt left forearm.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:  ,Thrombosed arteriovenous shunt, left forearm with venous anastomotic stenosis.,PROCEDURE:  ,Thrombectomy AV shunt, left forearm and patch angioplasty of the venous anastomosis.,ANESTHESIA: , Local.,SKIN PREP: , Betadine.,DRAINS: , None.,PROCEDURE TECHNIQUE:  ,The left arm was prepped and draped.  Xylocaine 1% was administered and a transverse antecubital incision was made over the venous limb of the graft, which was dissected out and encircled with a vessel loop.  The runoff vein was dissected out and encircled with the vessel loop as well.  A longitudinal incision was made over the venous anastomosis.  There was a narrowing in the area and slightly the incision was extended more proximally.  There was good back bleeding from the vein as well as bleeding from the more distal vein.  These were occluded with noncrushing DeBakey clamps and the patient was given 5000 units of heparin intravenously.  A #4 Fogarty was used to extract thrombus from the graft systematically until the arterial plug was removed and excellent inflow was established.  There was a narrowing in the mid portion of the venous limb of the graft, which was dilated with a #5 coronary dilator.  The Fogarty catheter was then passed up the vein, but no clot was obtained.  A patch PTFE material was fashioned and was sutured over the graftotomy with running 6-0 Gore-Tex suture.  Clamps were removed and flow established.  A thrill was easily palpable.  Hemostasis was achieved and the wound was irrigated and closed with 3-0 Vicryl subcutaneous suture followed by 4-0 nylon on the skin.  A sterile dressing was applied.  The patient was taken to the recovery room in satisfactory condition having tolerated the procedure well.  Sponge, instrument and needle counts were reported as correct.cardiovascular / pulmonary, angioplasty, venous, anastomosis, patch angioplasty, av shunt, venous anastomosis, av, thrombectomy, thrombosed, arteriovenous, vein, forearm, shunt,