The application of Semantic Publishing technologies in the Science of Science research domain for the Humanities ﬁeld Presenter: Ivan Heibi Ph.D. Student Digital Humanities Advanced Research Centre (DHARC), Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy) Email: ivan.heibi2@unibo.it Large-scale data analysis Network analysis Social science Semantic Publishing 1 3 Resources Limitations 2 Methodologies 4 Desirable Outcomes Focus on journal article-oriented study ﬁelds. Books seems to be the most cited doc-type by humanities ﬁelds, yet less available. Literature and History are two highly reasonable study ﬁelds to take in consideration • The lower proportion of journal articles cited by humanities compared to the scientiﬁc oriented domains case. • The ageing rate. • The local relevance. • The presence of a division between publications directed toward researchers and writings directed to a public audience The application of Semantic Web technologies in the scholarly publishing domain [2][3]. This approach has already been adapted and still used in many projects (e.g. OpenCitations), gaining positive impacts mostly in its application to scientiﬁc ﬁelds [4]. The Semantic Publishing methods helps us getting data out onto the Web in linked semantically form, which is a high proﬁt, specially if open standards and open source tools are used. This will increase the collaborative nature of the community developments and rapid progress. Semantic Web technologies are a striking approach for building knowledge graphs to analyse and structure the discovered patterns. 1. What are the common formalisms and constructional patterns adopted for citations inside Humanities documents (e.g. a classiﬁcation according to the document sections) ? 2. What are the reasons, i.e. the citation function [5], to cite other works and what are the most important ones ? Science of Science Quantify and predict scientiﬁc research and its resulting outcomes [1] Background and Purpose Project Workﬂow The Research • Facing up my research questions using SoS research empowered with Semantic Web technologies, could gain revolutionary impacts considering the low coverage it has achieved over the Humanities in the past years. Broaden the knowledge over citations and their usage will lead future researchers improve their works and effectively address their research questions. • Developing new applications that assist the community into a functional usage of the discoveries made. Hopefully the developed tools, should broaden the horizon regarding Humanities researchers knowledge, obtained from the methodologies potentials. Learning from previous approaches Deﬁning the datasets, resources and tools to use Answering the research questions Building applications to highlight the discoveries made References 1. Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., ... & Vespignani, A. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185 2. Shotton, D. (2009). Semantic publishing: the coming revolution in scientiﬁc journal publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1087/2009202 3. Shotton, D., Portwin, K., Klyne, G., & Miles, A. (2009). Adventures in semantic publishing: exemplar semantic enhancements of a research article. PLoS computational biology, 5(4), e1000361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000361 4. Peroni, S., Dutton, A., Gray, T., & Shotton, D. (2015). Setting our bibliographic references free: towards open citation data. Journal of Documentation, 71(2), 253-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2013-0166 5. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). An annotation scheme for citation function. 6. Heibi, I., Peroni, S., & Shotton, D. (2019). COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1904.06052. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.06052 7. Heibi, I., Peroni, S., & Shotton, D. Enabling text sea