original: Article 166 was meant to control the possession of arms, but it was used to target Armenians by restricting them to possess arms.
simplifications: Article 166 was meant to control arms ownership, but it was used to target Armenians by restricting them from possessing arms Article 166 kept Armenians from having guns. It was meant to control the ownership of guns. Article 166 was meant to control the ownership of guns. Instead it was used to stop Armenians from owning guns. Article 166 was to control possession of arms but was used to target Armenians by restricting their access. Article 166 was designed to control the possession of arms. However, it was used to target Armenians by restricting them to possess arms. Article 166 was meant to control the ownership of arms. It was used to target Armenians by stopping them from having arms. Article 166 was supposed to control who owned guns. It was used to target Armenians and ban them from owning guns. Article 166 was meant to control the possession of arms. This Article was used to target Armenians by not allowing them to have arms. Article 166 was made to control ownership of guns. It was used against Armenians by keeping them from owning guns. Article 166 was intended to control the custody of arms, but it was used to target Armenians by restricting them to the ownership of arms.