original: Even if a contribution violates the precise wording of a rule, it might still be a good contribution.
simplifications: even if an addition does against the exact wording of a rule, it might still be a good one. If new information violates some rules, it might still be good. Even if a contribution violates a rule, it may still be a good contribution. A contribution can break a rule. It could still be a valid contribution. Even if a contribution breaks the exact wording of a rule, it might still be a good contribution. Even if a contribution violates the exact wording of a rule, it could still be good. If a contribution violates the precise wording of a rule, it could still be a good contribution. Even if a contribution is against a rule, it could still be a good contribution. Even if a contribution breaks the wording of a rule, it could be a good contribution. Even though the contribution is contradictory to the exact wording of the law, it may still be a good contribution.