evolawyer/inlegalbert-sc-ner-silver huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT REPORTS

[2018] 6 S.C.R.

UNITED BIOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED

ORCHID CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED

AND ORS.

(M. A. No. 1764 of 2017)

(Civil Appeal Nos. 19938 of 2017)

JANUARY 17, 2018

[RANJAN GOGOI AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.]


CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: M. A. No. 1764 of 2017 in Civil Appeal No. 19938 of 2017.

From the Judgment and Order dated 18.05.2012 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in L. P. A. No. 679 of 2011.

J. Sai Deepak, Bharadwaj Jaishankar, Mohit Goel, Sidhant Goel, Ashutosh Nagar, P. D. V. Srikar, Deepankar Mishra, Mishra Saurabh, Advs. for the Appellant.

Gladys Daniels, S. Santanam, Swaminadhan, Ms. Aarthi Rajan, Advs. for the Respondents.

The following Order of the Court was passed:

O R D E R

1. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, the judgment of this Court dated 29th November, 2017 passed in Civil Appeal Nos.4767- 4769 of 2011 and other connected matters is modified in the following terms.


(i) In paragraph 13, the words "The arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants in the appeals" shall be substituted by the words "The arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants in Civil Appeal Nos.4767- 4769 of 2001 and respondents in the appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27309 of 2012".

(ii) In paragraph 14, the words "In reply, on behalf of the respondent", shall be substituted by the words "In reply, on behalf of the respondents in Civil Appeal Nos.4767-4769 of 2001 and appellant in the appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27309 of 2012".

(iii) Paragraph 37 shall read as under:

37. In the light of the above while answering the question arising in the manner indicated above, we dismiss Civil Appeal Nos.4767- 4679 of 2001 and Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.1851 of 2009 and allow the civil appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 27309 of 2012.

2. The application is allowed in the above terms.

Kalpana K. Tripathy Application allowed.

UNITED BIOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. ORCHID

CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS.

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

(Civil Appeal No. 877 of 2018)

MAY 14, 2018

[J. CHELAMESWAR AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.]

Jharkhand Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004 - rr.21, 22 and 27 - In Judgment dated 11.5.2018 titled Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand and reported in [2017] 7 SCR 755, paragraphs 25 and 26 stand deleted - Further paragraph 27 to be read as "the respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within a period of three months from the date of the order" .

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 877 of 2018.

From the Judgment and Order dated 03.03.2016 of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in W. P. (S) No. 5186 of 2014.

Amit Gupta, Ms. Mansi Kukreja (For M/s. Mitter & Mitter Co.), Advs. for the Appellants.

Tapesh Kumar Singh, Mohd. Waquas, Aditya Pratap Singh, Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Advs. for the Respondents.

The following Order of the Court was passed:

O R D E R

On the matter being mentioned, the learned counsel for the parties stated that there may not be necessity of a direction as contained in paragraphs 25 and 26 of the judgment passed by this Court on 11.5.2018, which accordingly stand deleted.

They further plead that paragraph 27 of the said judgment may be read as under:

[2017] 7 S.C.R. 765

SUPREME COURT REPORTS


"The respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within a period of three months from the date of the order." Ordered accordingly.

Devika Gujral Modification in earlier order.