V. SUBBA RAO AND OTHERS

THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL

DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF AP. AND OTHERS

FEBRUARY 27, 1996

(AM. AHMADI, CJ, SUJATA V. MANOHAR AND

K. VENKATASWAMI, JJ.)

Service Law :

Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules, 1966: Rules 3( 17) and 4.

Reversio1t-Employees holdingLast Grade Post-Promoted to the post of Junior Assistants-Reverted to 01iginal posts on ground of non-completion

of 5 years service in last grade-Held: Rule 4(2) prescribing less than 5 years se1vice in last grade for promotion within Ministerial Se1vice~Not ap- D plicablt--R.ule 3( 17) which prescdbes minimum five years of se1vice applicable-Hence reversion justified.

The petitioners were the children of deceased employees of the respondents and were appointed on compassionate grounds under the E quota for deceased employees' children on a consolidated pay. Subsequently they were appointed as regular employees on a regular scale of pay and were promoted to the post of Junior Assistants. A show-cause notice was issued to them to show cause why they should not be reverted to their Last Grade Post since five years' service in the Last Grade Post was required for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant. They had F worked only for about three years in the Last Grade Post. They submitted their explanation and contended that for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant, the minimum qualifying service was ordinarily three years and in no case less than two years.

However, in view of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial G Service Rules, 1966 which required a minimum of five years service in the Last Grade for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant the contentions raised by the petitioners were rejected by the respondents and they were reverted to their original posts. Being aggrieved by this order they filed applications before the State Administrative Tribunal challenging their H

, )

A order of reversion, which were dismissed. Aggrieved by the Tribunal's -4

judgment the petitioners preferred the present Special Leave petitions contending that they were entitled to the benefit of Rule 4(2) or in the alternative, to the benefit of G.O.M. No. 627.

Dismissing the petitions, this Court

HELD : 1.1. G.O.M. No. 627 deals only with promotions within the service and transfers. It applies to a member of a service when he is promoted from a lower post to a higher post in the same service. It does not, however, deal with promotions/appointmets from a lower grade C service to a post in a higher grade service. [1084-C; G]

1.2. In the present case, the petitioners have been promoted as Junior Assistants. The post of Junior Assistant is governed by the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules, 1966. Rule 3(17) specifically prescribes a minimum service of five years in the Last Grade Service for promotion D to the post of Junior Assistants in the Ministerial Service. This Rule applies to the petitioners. It is a later amendment which directly applies to the post in question and must prevail over any general Ad hoc Rule promulgated earlier. [1085-C; F-G]

1.3. Rule 4(2) which deals with promotion within the Ministerial E Services if applicable for promotion from the lower category or post to the next higher category or post. This Rule applies only to promotions within the service, of members of the service and has no application to recruit-. ments made under Rule 3. [1086-A; C-D]

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9268-70of1994.

From the Judgment and Order dated 13.4.94 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in OA Nos. 2582, 2686 and 2715 of 1993.

Rajiv Dhavan, R. Santhana Krishnan and KR. Nagaraja for the Petitioners.

G. Prabhakar for the Respondents.

H The following Judgment. of the Court was delivered by

~.· /

J; /,' , \ ' ,_;. -

\-· -·.' "-- .-- -- ' - - . \. V.SUBBARAOv.OOVI'.PAN6J.AYATRAJ ANDRUR.ALDEV.[MitS.SUJATA V.MAN'OHAR.J.J 1083 -- ...... - ~

0 MRS. SUJATA V •. MANOHAR, 1'.' The petitioners wer~ originally 'A employees of Zilla Praja Parishads of various Districts in the State. of Aridhra Pradesh. The petitioners are the children of deceased employees of the res pendents. In or around December 1983 they were appointed by the respondents on compassionate .grounds as Watchinen etc. under the . quota for deceased employees' children on a consolidated pay. In Decem- . B her 1988 they 'wee appointed as regular employees )n the Zilla Praja Parishad on a regular scale of pay. In 1991-1992 they were promoted to the post of Junior Assistants. ·

 In April 1993 a show-cause notice was issued to., the petitioners to show-cause why they should not be reverted to their Last'Grade Post sin.ce C five years' service in the Last Grade Post is requiredfor promotion to the post of Junior Assistant. The petitioners had worked forharilly three years in the Last Grade Post. The petitioners submitted their explanation relying upon G.O.Ms. No. 627 of 21st of Decembe~, 1983. They contended that for .·promotion to the post of J uruor A5sisfal1t the minim uni qualifying service . D

was ordinarily three years and in no case less than two 'years.

-" . .

In view, however, of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Ser.ice.Rules,1966 .. as amended byG.O.Ms; No~ 589, dated 19th of November 1986, which requires a minimum of five yers service in the Last Grade for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant; the contntions raised E by. the petitioners were .rejected by the respondents i, y an order dated 295.1993 issued by respondent No. 2. The petitioners were reverted to their original post. Being aggrieved by this order the petitioners filed applications before the Andhra Pradesh Admini<trative , Tribunal challeng- ·

'! ing their order of reversion. These applications have been dismissed by the F Andhra Pradsh Administrative Tribunal. The present petitions challenge the order passed by the Andhra pradesh Administrative Tribunal.

 . The question is whether the petitioners need to have five years' service ,, S Watchmen, Attenders etc. forappointment as Junior Assistants . .The petitioners have placed reliance on G.O.Ms. No. 627 dated 21st of G December, 1983. This Government Order is issued by the General Administration Department in connection with certain SpeciaVAd hoc Rules relating to various State and Subordinate Services. It states that. in SpeciaVAd hoc Rules relating to State and Subordinate Services a provision is made to the effect that a member of the service should ordinarily put in a H

• •

A period of five years of service in the lower category from which promotion is to .be made to the next higher category in the same senlice or when an appointment .is to be made by transfer from any other seryice (underlining . ours). The Government with a view to avoiding administrative difficulties had issued an Ad hoc Rule set out in G.O.Ms. No. 85 datd 12.2.1979 B reducing "ordinarily five years in the lower category" to three years of which at least two years' service was required to be in the category, class or grade from which promotion was to be made. As the wording of the Rule was considered defec:tive, it was decided to make a fresh Ad hoc Rule in its place. Accordingly a Notification (G.O.Ms. No.627) was issued on 21.12.1983 framing an Ad hoc Rule superseding the earlier Ad ho.c Rule C issued in G.O.Ms. No. 85 dated 12th of February, 1979. The new Ad hoc Rule was deemed to have come into force on 12th of February, 1979. It is to the following effect :-

"Notwithstanding anything contained in the relevant Special Rules or the Ad/we rules for the State and Subordinate Service, the minimum period of "Ordinarily five years of service" wherever prescribed in the said Rules for appointment of a member of service from the lower categ01y, class or grade, to the next higher category, class or grade whether such appointment is made either by promotion in the regular line or by recrnitment by transfer from any other se1vice, that period shall be reduced to "ordinarily three years, but in no case shall it be less than two years, in the category, class or grade from which such promotion or transfer is made".

(underlining ours)

(N.B.: The comma after the phrase "less than two years" has been added by an amendment made in 1989 to clarify the position)

The Ad hoc rule deals only with promotions within the Service and transfers. It applies to a member of a Service when he is promoted from a G lower post to a higher post in the same Service. It also applies when the appointment is by transfer from another Service. It doe~ not, however; deal with promotions/appointments from a lower grade Service to a post in a higher grade Service.

The Ad hoc Rule which replaces the Ad hoc Rule framed in 1979 H was promulgated to overcome administrative difficulties. These administra-

J ' V. SUBBARAO v. GOVT. PANCHA YATRAJ AND RURAL DEV. (MRS. SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J.J 1085

tive difficulties have been spelt out in G.0.Ms. No. 85of12.2.1979. It states A that persons satisfying five years of service are not available and hence to avoid administrative difficulties and disputes it has been decided to reduce the existing period of five years' service to three years' service of which there should be service of a minimum period of two years in the class, category or grade from which promotion is made to the next higher B category.

In the present case, the petitioners have been promoted as Junior Assistants. The post of Junior Assistant is governed by the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules of 1966. Under rule 1 of the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules, 1966 the composition of the Ministerial Service C is set out. It consists of the categories of posts which are set out in that . Rule. Category 10 consists of Junior Assistants in the offices of the Heads of the Departments and Directorates; while category 11 includes Junior Assistants in Subordinate Offices.

Rule 3 of these Rules deals with the method of recruitment to the D various categories of posts enumerated in Rule 1. It also prescribes the necessary qualifications for recruitment and promotion. By G.O. Ms. No. 589 of 19.11.1986 Rule 3 was amended by the insertion of Sub-rule (17) which is as follows :

"Rule 3( 17) :

33.3% of the posts of Junior Assistants in Panchayati Raj Bodies

are reserved for Record Assistants, Attenders and other equivalent categories who possess minimum general educational qualification F and who have put in minimum service of five years in -that categ01y."

This is a specific Rule inserted in the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Services Rules, 1966 by an amendment made on 19th of November, 1986, much later than the formulation of the Ad hoc Rule of 1983. This Rule specifically prescribes a minimum service of five years in the Last Grade Service as G Record Assistants, Attenders and the like for promotion to the post of junior Assistants in the Ministerial Service. This Rule applies to the petitioners. It is a later amendment which directly applies to the post in question and must prevail over any general Ad hoc Rule promulgated earlier.

A Rule 4(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules which deals with promotion within the Ministerial Services, provides that "no member of the service shal~ on or after 12th of February, 1979, be eligible for promotion from the lower category or post to the next higher category or post unless he has ordinarily put in a service for a minimum period of B three years in the category from which he is to be promoted but in no case shall it be , less than two years in the category from which such promotion is made". This Sub-rule (2) has a clear nexus with G.O.Ms. No. 85 of 12.2. 1979 jind the subsequent GD.Ms. No. 627 of 21.12.1983, both of which came into effect from 12th of February, 1979. Rule 4(2) which was brought C in by G.0.Ms. No. 189 of 22.3.1984 thus appears to have incorporated the Ad hoc Rule set out in G.O.Ms. No. 627 of 1983 in the Andhra Pradesh

Ministerial Service Rules. This clearly indicates that G.O.Ms. No. 85 dated 12th February, 1979 and the subsequent G.O.Ms. No. 627 dated 21st of December, 1983 apply only to promotions within the Service, of members of the Service. This Rule has no application to recruitments made under D Rule 3 when they are not by promotion under Rule 4 but by promotion from other lower grade Services. Rule 3(17) provides for recruitment to 33.3% of the post of Junior Assistants in Panchayati Raj Bodies from Record Assistants, Attenders and other equivalent categories in the lower grade service who have put in a ininimum service of five years in that E category. Rule 4(2) does not apply to such recruitment.

In fact, in Rule 3, wherever in any category of posts, there is a pr.ovision for promotion under Rule 4, it is expressly so mentioned. For example, Rules 3(1) first part, 3(2) and 3(11) are as follows :

"Rule 3: Method of Recrnitment - Special:

(1) : Besides promotion as provided in Rule 4, the first vacancy out of every eight successive clear vacancies excluding leave vacancies of Superintendents in the Offices of the Heads of Departments and Directorates shall, on or after 23rd December, 1980, be reserved to be filled by transfer of Superintendents, Managers or Head Clerks working in the Subordinate Offices under the administrative control of the concerned Head of the Department or the Directorate, as the case may be, or for special reasons from any other service or from any other Department in this service .. ·

V. SUBBARAO v. GOVf. PANCHA YATRAJ AND RURAL DEV. [MRS. SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J.) 1087

3(2) : Besides promotion as provided in Rule 4, the first vacancy out of every four successive clear vacancies, of Senior Assistants in the Offices of Heads of Departments and Directorates shall be reserved to be filled only from among suitable Senior Assistants, working in the Subordinate Offices of the concerned Head of the B Department or the Directorate. If any person so appointed by transfer suffers reversion, he shall be reverted to his parent office or Department :

3(11) : Besides promotion as provided in Rule 4, appointment to the post of store-keeper in the Information and Public Relations Department shall be made by direct recruitment if no suitable candidate is available for appointment by recruitment by promotion or by transfer."

Rule 4 is not mentioned in respect of recruitment to the post of Junior Assistants. The contention, therefore, of the petitioners that they are entitled to the benefit of Rule 4(2) or in the alternative, to the benefit of the G.O.Ms. No. 627 dated 21st of December, 1983, cannot be accepted.

Thus we uphold the conclusion of the Tribunal.

In the premises, the special leave petitions are dismissed. In the circumstances, there will be no order as to costs.

v.s.s.

Petitions dismissed.