An Exploration of Autonetnography as an eResearch Methodology to Examine Learning and Teaching Scholarship in Networked Learning
Author: Howard, Lyz
Date: 2016-00-00
Type: Journal Articles
Subjects: Ethnography,Cooperative Learning,Computer Assisted Instruction,Faculty Development,Guidelines,Professional Isolation,Geographic Isolation,Electronic Learning,Teaching Methods,Autobiographies,Theory Practice Relationship,Learning Processes,Networks,Epistemology

As an experienced face-to-face teacher, working in a small Crown Dependency with no Higher Education Institute (HEI) to call its own, the subsequent geographical and professional isolation in the context of Networked Learning (NL), as a sub-set of eLearning, calls for innovative ways in which to develop self-reliant methods of professional development. Jones and De Laat (2016, p.43) claim that NL is different from other eLearning sub-sets, for example, Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) and Computer-Supported-Collaborative-Learning (CSCL) because of its &quot;focus on pedagogy and understanding how social relationships (and networked practices) influence learning rather than having a predominantly technical agenda for change in education&quot;. NL, rather than TEL or CSL, therefore, locates the context for this paper. My intent was to develop a bespoke professional development framework to facilitate independent and self-directed NL teaching development. To scaffold my professional development autonetnography (ANG) was chosen to facilitate my learning. The concept of ANG was introduced by Kozinets &amp; Kedzior (2009) as an autobiographical extension to the ethnographic genre Netnography defined by Kozinets (2006) as an interpretive research methodology to examine online observations and interactions. Whilst recent researchers of digital learning claim that has potential to add to a growing body of knowledge that accepts the post-modern use of self as an insider researcher (Ferreira, 2012; Persdotter, 2013; Mkono, Ruhanen &amp; Markwell, 2015) none have explained &quot;how&quot; to undertake ANG. There appears here, to be a theory-practice gap (Kessels and Korthagen, 1996) and the problem lies within the argument that there is no current theory upon which to practice ANG. This opportunity to examine more closely the subjective and reflexive insider researcher perspective of being an online scholar (as a learner or teacher) would respond to this gap in current eResearch knowledge. This paper uses meta-ethnography (Noblit &amp; Hare, 1988) as a method to systematically examine methodology relating to autoethnography, with the purpose of working towards developing a framework for undertaking ANG as an emerging eResearch methodology. Seven phases of meta-ethnography formed the method for synthesising autoethnographic methodological data and translating these into ANG methodological data. Findings from this synthesis are reported through the autoethnographic tripartite scheme of mimesis, poiesis and kinesis (Holman-Jones, Adams, &amp; Ellis, 2013a). From this synthesis, the &quot;autonetnographic&quot; &quot;I&quot; framework was developed and forms a methodological basis for future ANG studies to examine teaching and/or learning scholarship in NL and the potential for considering adaptation of ANG for use in eLearning more generally.