Measuring up to the Model: A Ranking of State Public Charter School Laws. Ninth Annual Edition
Author: Ziebarth, Todd
Date: 2018-01-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Charter Schools,Public Schools,School Law,State Legislation,Educational Legislation,Educational Trends,Accountability,Educational Equity (Finance),State Aid

This ninth edition of &quot;Measuring up to the Model: A Ranking of State Charter School Laws&quot; presents the latest activity in charter public school legislation across the country. For the second year in a row, the 2018 rankings measure each state's charter school law against the National Alliance's updated model charter school law, &quot;New Model Law for Supporting the Growth of High-Quality Charter Public Schools: Second Edition&quot; (ED613003), released in October 2016. The Ninth Edition of &quot;Measuring Up to the Model&quot; ranks public charter school laws in 44 states and the District of Columbia. Each law receives a score based on 21 essential metrics, including flexibility, accountability, and equity. Some key takeaways from this year's rankings include: (1) For the third year in a row, Indiana has the nation's strongest charter school law in the country, ranking No. 1 (out of 45). Indiana's law does not cap charter school growth, includes multiple authorizers, and provides a fair amount of autonomy and accountability. Indiana has also made notable strides in recent years to provide more equitable funding to charter schools, although some work remains to be done; (2) Colorado jumped from No. 5 to No. 2, in part because of legislation that the state enacted in 2017 that will provide charter schools with equitable access to a local funding stream that most districts had refused to share with charter schools (i.e., local mill levy override); (3) Kentucky became the 44th state (along with the District of Columbia) to enact a charter school law in 2017. Kentucky lawmakers took great care in writing this law to ensure that the state heeded the lessons learned within the first quarter-century of the charter movement and also took into the account the state constitutional constraints that exist. As a result, they enacted a relatively strong charter school law, ranking No. 10; (4) The Top 10 includes a mixture of states with more mature movements (Indiana at No. 1, Colorado at No. 2, Minnesota at No. 4, D.C. at No. 8, and Florida at No. 9) and states with newer movements (Washington at No. 3, Alabama at No. 5, Mississippi at No. 6, Maine at No. 7, and Kentucky at No. 10). The fact that these states are in the Top 10 speaks to the fact that many existing states continue to strengthen their laws based on what's working (and what's not working) and that new states rely heavily on those lessons learned so they don't repeat the mistakes of the states that came before them; (5) States that are enacting laws for the first time and states that are overhauling their laws are bypassing states that were previously more highly ranked, such as Arizona, Louisiana, and New York. That doesn't mean that the laws have gotten weaker in the states being bypassed. They remain strong. What it does mean, though, is that more and more states have better and better laws across the country, a good place to be if you believe that all states should have high-quality charter school laws; and (6) Maryland has the nation's weakest charter school law, ranking No. 45 (out of 45). While Maryland's law does not cap charter school growth, it allows only district authorizers and provides little autonomy, insufficient accountability, and inequitable funding to charter schools. Rounding out the bottom five states are Iowa (No. 41), Wyoming (No. 42), Alaska (No. 43), and Kansas (No. 44). Appended to the report is: Methodological Details. [To view the eighth edition, see ED581588.]