ethanporcaro/eric-fulltext-meta huggingface dataset:
Measuring Up 2006: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Wyoming
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2006-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Comparative Education,Foreign Countries

The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2006&quot; is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately does the state prepare students for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates or degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Wyoming include: (1) Despite improvement, Wyoming's performance in preparing students to succeed in college remains low when compared with other states. This year Wyoming receives a C- in preparation; (2) Despite a decline in performance, Wyoming performs well in enrolling students in higher education when compared with other states. This year Wyoming receives a B+ in participation; (3) Wyoming has lost ground in providing affordable higher education. This year Wyoming is one of many states to receive an F in affordability; (4) Wyoming has seen a notable improvement in the proportion of students earning certificates or degrees in a timely manner. Wyoming receives an A in completion this year; (5) Wyoming continues to struggle to realize the benefits that come from having a highly educated population. This year Wyoming receives a C- in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Wyoming receives an &quot;Incomplete&quot; in Learning because insufficient data would not allow meaningful state-by-state comparisons. However, data are available this year to examine the readiness of college graduates--from two- and four-year institutions--for advanced practice. This report also includes international comparisons, additional information, questions and answers, and state grades. (Contains 1 figure.) [For &quot;Measuring Up, 2006. The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED493360.]
Measuring Up 2006: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Washington
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2006-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Comparative Education,Foreign Countries

The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2006&quot; is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately does the state prepare students for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates or degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Washington include: (1) Washington has made progress in preparing students to succeed in college. This year Washington receives a B in preparation; (2) Washington has seen a decline in the proportion of students enrolling in higher education. Washington receives a C- in participation this year; (3) Washington has made no notable progress in providing affordable higher education. Washington receives a D- in affordability this year; (4) Washington has made gains in the proportion of students who earn a certificate or degree in a timely manner. Washington receives an A in completion this year; (5) Washington has seen a substantial increase in the benefits the state receives from having a more highly educated population. This year Washington earns an A- in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Washington receives an &quot;Incomplete&quot; in Learning because insufficient data would not allow meaningful state-by-state comparisons. However, data are available this year to examine the readiness of college graduates--from two- and four-year institutions--for advanced practice. This report also includes international comparisons, additional information, questions and answers, and state grades. (Contains 3 figures.) [For &quot;Measuring Up, 2006. The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED493360.]
Measuring Up 2006: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Wisconsin
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2006-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Comparative Education,Foreign Countries

The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2006&quot; is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately does the state prepare students for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates or degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Wisconsin include: (1) Wisconsin has shown substantial improvement in preparing students to succeed in college. This year Wisconsin receives a B+ in preparation; (2) Despite a decline in performance, Wisconsin performs well in enrolling students in higher education when compared with other states. This year Wisconsin receives an A- in participation; (3) Wisconsin has made no notable progress in providing affordable higher education. This year Wisconsin receives an F in affordability; (4) Wisconsin has shown substantial improvement in the proportion of students earning certificates or degrees in a timely manner. This year Wisconsin receives an A in completion; (5) Wisconsin has seen an increase in the benefits the state receives from having a more highly educated population. This year Wisconsin earns a B- in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Wisconsin receives an &quot;Incomplete&quot; in Learning because insufficient data would not allow meaningful state-by-state comparisons. However, data are available this year to examine the readiness of college graduates--from two- and four-year institutions--for advanced practice. This report also includes international comparisons, additional information, questions and answers, and state grades. (Contains 1 figure.) [For &quot;Measuring Up, 2006. The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED493360.]
Measuring Up 2006: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Vermont
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2006-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Comparative Education,Foreign Countries

The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2006&quot; is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately does the state prepare students for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates or degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Vermont include: (1) Vermont has made little progress in preparing students to succeed in college. This year Vermont receives a B- in preparation; (2) Vermont has made no notable progress in enrolling students in higher education. This year Vermont receives a C in participation; (3) Vermont has lost ground in providing affordable higher education. This year Vermont receives an F in affordability; (4) Despite a decline in performance, Vermont continues to perform well in the proportion of students who earn their certificate or degree in a timely manner. This year Vermont receives an A in completion; (5) Vermont continues to perform very well in realizing the benefits that come from having a more highly educated population. This year Vermont earns an A- in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Vermont receives an &quot;Incomplete&quot; in Learning because insufficient data would not allow meaningful state-by-state comparisons. However, data are available this year to examine the readiness of college graduates--from two- and four-year institutions--for advanced practice. This report also includes international comparisons, additional information, questions and answers, and state grades. (Contains 1 figure.) [For &quot;Measuring Up, 2006. The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED493360.]
Measuring Up 2006: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Virginia
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2006-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Comparative Education,Foreign Countries

The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2006&quot; is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately does the state prepare students for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates or degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Virginia include: (1) Virginia has shown improvement in preparing students to succeed in college. This year Virginia receives an A- in preparation; (2) Virginia continues to perform well in enrolling students in higher education. This year Virginia receives a B in participation; (3) Virginia has made no notable progress in providing affordable higher education. This year Virginia receives an F in affordability; (4) Virginia has shown substantial improvement in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. Virginia earns a B+ in completion this year; (5) Virginia has seen an increase in the benefits the state receives from having a more highly educated population. This year Virginia earns an A in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Virginia receives an &quot;Incomplete&quot; in Learning because insufficient data would not allow meaningful state-by-state comparisons. However, data are available this year to examine the readiness of college graduates--from two- and four-year institutions--for advanced practice. This report also includes international comparisons, additional information, questions and answers, and state grades. (Contains 2 figures.) [For &quot;Measuring Up, 2006. The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED493360.]
Measuring Up 2006: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Utah
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2006-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Comparative Education,Foreign Countries

The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2006&quot; is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately does the state prepare students for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates or degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Utah include: (1) Utah has shown notable improvement on its already excellent performance in preparing students to succeed in college. This year Utah receives an A in preparation; (2) Despite a decline in performance, Utah continues to do well in enrolling students in higher education when compared with other states. This year Utah receives a B in participation; (3) Utah has made no notable progress in providing affordable higher education. This year Utah receives a C- in affordability; (4) Utah continues to perform well in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. Utah receives a B in completion this year; (5) Utah has seen an increase in the benefits the state receives from having a more highly educated population. Utah earns an A- in benefits this year; and (6) Like most states, Utah receives an &quot;Incomplete&quot; in Learning because insufficient data would not allow meaningful state-by-state comparisons. However, data are available this year to examine the readiness of college graduates--from two- and four-year institutions--for advanced practice. This report also includes international comparisons, additional information, questions and answers, and state grades. (Contains 1 figure.) [For &quot;Measuring Up, 2006. The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED493360.]
Measuring Up 2006: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Texas
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2006-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Comparative Education,Foreign Countries

The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2006&quot; is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately does the state prepare students for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates or degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Texas include: (1) Texas has shown improvement in preparing students to succeed in college. This year Texas receives a B- in preparation; (2) Texas has made no notable progress in enrolling students in higher education. This year Texas receives a C+ in participation; (3) Texas has made no notable progress in making higher education affordable. This year Texas receives an F in affordability; (4) Despite substantial improvement, Texas's performance in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner remains low when compared with other states. Texas receives a C+ in completion this year; (5) Texas has made no notable progress in realizing the benefits that come from having a more highly educated population. This year Texas receives a B- in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Texas receives an &quot;Incomplete&quot; in Learning because insufficient data would not allow meaningful state-by-state comparisons. However, data are available this year to examine the readiness of college graduates--from two- and four-year institutions--for advanced practice. This report also includes international comparisons, additional information, questions and answers, and state grades. (Contains 3 figures.) [For &quot;Measuring Up, 2006. The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED493360.]
Measuring Up 2006: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Tennessee
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2006-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Comparative Education,Foreign Countries

The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2006&quot; is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately does the state prepare students for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates or degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Tennessee include: (1) Despite substantial improvement in preparing students to succeed in college, Tennessee's performance remains low when compared with other states. This year Tennessee receives a C- in preparation; (2) Despite improvement, Tennessee's performance in enrolling students in higher education remains low when compared with other states. This year Tennessee receives a C- in participation; (3) Tennessee has made no notable progress in providing affordable higher education. This year Tennessee is one of many states to receive an F in affordability; (4) Tennessee has shown substantial improvement in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. This year Tennessee receives a B in completion; (5) Despite improvement, Tennessee continues to lag many other states in realizing the benefits that come from having a more highly educated population. Tennessee receives a C+ in benefits this year; (6) Like most states, Tennessee receives an &quot;Incomplete&quot; in Learning because insufficient data would not allow meaningful state-by-state comparisons. However, data are available this year to examine the readiness of college graduates--from two- and four-year institutions--for advanced practice. This report also includes international comparisons, additional information, questions and answers, and state grades. (Contains 2 figures.) [For &quot;Measuring Up, 2006. The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED493360.]