ethanporcaro/eric-fulltext-meta huggingface dataset:
Florida State University Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. Florida State University's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
Florida Polytechnic University Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. Florida Polytechnic University's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
Teach It, Don't Preach It: The Differential Effects of Directly Communicated and Self-Generated Utility-Value Information
Author: Canning, Elizabeth A.
Date: 2015-03-00
Type: Journal Articles
Subjects: Intervention,Social Psychology,Undergraduate Students,Comparative Analysis,Program Effectiveness,Mental Computation,Self Esteem,Multiple Regression Analysis,Relevance (Education),Student Attitudes,Essays,Content Analysis

Social-psychological interventions in education have used a variety of &quot;self-persuasion&quot; or &quot;saying-is-believing&quot; techniques to encourage students to articulate key intervention messages. These techniques are used in combination with more overt strategies, such as the direct communication of messages in order to promote attitude change. However, these different strategies have rarely been systematically compared, particularly in controlled laboratory settings. We focus on 1 intervention based in expectancy-value theory designed to promote perceptions of utility value in the classroom and test different intervention techniques to promote interest and performance. Across 3 laboratory studies, we used a mental math learning paradigm in which we varied whether students wrote about utility value for themselves or received different forms of directly communicated information about the utility value of a novel mental math technique. In Study 1, we examined the difference between directly communicated and self-generated utility-value information and found that directly communicated utility-value information undermined performance and interest for individuals who lacked confidence, but that self-generated utility had positive effects. However, Study 2 suggests that these negative effects of directly communicated utility value can be ameliorated when participants are also given the chance to generate their own examples of utility value, revealing a synergistic effect of directly communicated and self-generated utility value. In Study 3, we found that individuals who lacked confidence benefited more when everyday examples of utility value were communicated, rather than career and school examples.
Florida Gulf Coast University Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. Florida Gulf Coast University's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
New College of Florida Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. New College of Florida's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
University of Central Florida Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. University of Central Florida's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
University of North Florida Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. University of North Florida's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
University of South Florida St. Petersburg Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. University of South Florida St. Petersburg's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
University of South Florida Tampa Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. University of South Florida Tampa's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions.
University of Florida Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review
Author: State University System of Florida, Board of Governors
Date: 2013-00-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Strategic Planning,Institutional Mission,Institutional Characteristics,Goal Orientation,Educational Finance,Tuition,Fees,Enrollment,Program Administration,Performance,Educational Indicators,Progress Monitoring,Governing Boards,Academic Persistence,Graduation Rate,Educational Quality,Academic Degrees,Outcomes of Education,Income,Research,Expenditures,Costs,Student Characteristics,Educational Technology,School Community Relationship,Operating Expenses,Budgets,Student Financial Aid,State Universities

The State University System of Florida has developed three tools that aid in guiding the System's future: (1) The Board of Governors' new &quot;Strategic Plan 2012-2025&quot; is driven by goals and associated metrics that stake out where the System is headed; (2) The Board's &quot;Annual Accountability Report&quot; provides yearly tracking for how the System is progressing toward its goals; and (3) Institutional &quot;Work Plans&quot; connect the two and create an opportunity for greater dialogue relative to how each institution contributes to the System's overall vision. Once a Work Plan is approved by each institution's respective Boards of Trustees, the Board of Governors will review and consider the plan for potential acceptance of 2013-14 components. University of Florida's &quot;Work Plan Presentation for 2013-14 Board of Governors Review&quot; is divided into the following sections: (1) Strategy (Mission Statement, Vision Statement, Statement of Strategy, Strengths and Opportunities, and Key Initiatives &amp; Investments); (2) Key Performance Indicators (Goals Common to All Universities, Goals Specific to Research Universities, and Institution Specific Goals); (3) Operations (Fiscal Information (includes Tuition Differential Fee Request), Enrollment Planning, and Academic Program Coordination); and (4) Key Performance Indicator Definitions. [For &quot;University of Florida Work Plan Presentation for 2012-13 Board of Governors Review,&quot; see ED565403.]