ethanporcaro/eric-fulltext-meta huggingface dataset:
Measuring Up 2004: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Vermont
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2004-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment

This state report card is derived from &quot;Measuring Up 2004,&quot; the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately are students in each state being prepared for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates and degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive as a result of having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Vermont include: (1) Over the past decade, Vermont has improved in preparing students to succeed in college. However, Vermont continues to lag behind many other states and this year receives a C+ in preparation; (2) Vermont has made no notable progress in the number of students who enroll in higher education. This year Vermont receives a C in participation; (3) Over the past decade, Vermont has seen a further decline in its already poor performance in providing affordable higher education opportunities. This year Vermont receives an F in affordability; (4) In Vermont, the proportion of students who earn their certificate or degree in a timely manner has increased over the past decade. This year Vermont receives an A in completion; (5) Vermont has made no notable progress in the benefits accruing to the state from having a more highly educated population. This year Vermont receives a B- in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Vermont received an Incomplete in learning because there are no comparable data that would allow for meaningful state-by-state comparisons in learning. This report also includes additional information, questions and answers, state grades, and &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; resources. [For &quot;Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED508096.]
Measuring Up 2004: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Utah
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2004-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment

This state report card is derived from &quot;Measuring Up 2004,&quot; the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately are students in each state being prepared for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates and degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive as a result of having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Utah include: (1) Over the past decade, Utah has improved on its already excellent performance in preparing students to succeed in college. This year Utah receives an A in preparation; (2) Utah's performance in enrolling students in higher education has declined over the past decade. This year Utah receives a C+ in participation; (3) Over the past decade, Utah has made no notable progress in providing affordable higher education opportunities. This year Utah receives a C in affordability; (4) Utah, over the past decade, has made notable improvement in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. Utah receives a B in completion this year; (5) Over the past decade, Utah has been one of the few states to see a decline in the benefits accruing to the state from having a more highly educated population. Utah receives a B in benefits this year; and (6) Like most states, Utah received an Incomplete in learning because there are no comparable data that would allow for meaningful state-by-state comparisons in learning. This report also includes additional information, questions and answers, state grades, and &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; resources. [For &quot;Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED508096.]
Measuring Up 2004: The State Report Card on Higher Education. New York
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2004-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change

This state report card is derived from &quot;Measuring Up 2004,&quot; the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately are students in each state being prepared for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates and degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive as a result of having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for New York include: (1) Over the past decade, New York has shown substantial improvement in preparing students to succeed in college. This year New York receives an A in preparation; (2) New York, over the past decade, has made no notable progress in enrolling students in higher education. New York receives a C+ in participation this year; (3) New York has shown no notable progress in providing affordable higher education opportunities over the past decade. This year New York receives an F in affordability; (4) Over the past decade, New York has maintained its high performance in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. New York receives a B+ in completion this year; (5) Over the past decade, New York has seen an increase in the benefits the state receives from having a more highly educated population. This year New York receives a B in benefits; and (6) Like most states, New York received an Incomplete in learning because there are no comparable data that would allow for meaningful state-by-state comparisons in learning. This report also includes additional information, questions and answers, state grades, and &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; resources. [For &quot;Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED508096.]
Measuring Up 2004: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Ohio
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2004-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment,Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change

This state report card is derived from &quot;Measuring Up 2004,&quot; the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately are students in each state being prepared for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates and degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive as a result of having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Ohio include: (1) Over the past decade, Ohio has made no notable progress in preparing students to succeed in college. This year Ohio receives a C+ in preparation; (2) Ohio, over the past decade, has made no notable progress in enrolling students in higher education. Ohio receives a C+ in participation this year; (3) Ohio has made no notable progress in providing affordable higher education opportunities over the past decade. Ohio receives an F in affordability this year; (4) Over the past decade, Ohio has seen notable improvement in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. This year Ohio receives a B in completion; (5) Over the past decade, Ohio has seen an increase in the benefits accruing to the state as the result of having a more highly educated population. Ohio receives a B- in benefits this year; and (6) Like most states, Ohio received an Incomplete in learning because there are no comparable data that would allow for meaningful state-by-state comparisons in learning. This report also includes additional information, questions and answers, state grades, and &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; resources. [For &quot;Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED508096.]
Measuring Up 2004: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Rhode Island
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2004-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment

This state report card is derived from &quot;Measuring Up 2004,&quot; the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately are students in each state being prepared for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates and degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive as a result of having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Rhode Island include: (1) Over the past decade, Rhode Island has improved in preparing students to succeed in college. Despite that improvement, Rhode Island receives a C+ in preparation this year; (2) Rhode Island has shown consistently high performance in enrolling students in higher education over the past decade. This year Rhode Island receives an A in participation; (3) Over the past decade, Rhode Island has lost ground in its efforts to provide affordable higher education opportunities. Rhode Island, along with many other states this year, receives an F in affordability; (4) Improving upon its already excellent performance, Rhode Island has done well in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. This year Rhode Island receives an A in completion; (5) Over the past decade, Rhode Island has continued to benefit from having a more highly educated population. This year Rhode Island receives a B+ in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Rhode Island received an Incomplete in learning because there are no comparable data that would allow for meaningful state-by-state comparisons in learning. This report also includes additional information, questions and answers, state grades, and &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; resources. [For &quot;Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED508096.]
Measuring Up 2004: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Texas
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2004-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment

This state report card is derived from &quot;Measuring Up 2004,&quot; the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately are students in each state being prepared for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates and degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive as a result of having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Texas include: (1) Over the past decade, Texas has shown improvement in preparing students to succeed in college. Despite that improvement, Texas lags behind many other states and this year receives a C+ in preparation; (2) Texas has made no notable progress in enrolling students in higher education over the past decade. This year Texas receives a C in participation; (3) Texas has made no notable progress in making higher education affordable. This year Texas receives a D in affordability; (4) Over the past decade, Texas has seen substantial improvement in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. Despite that improvement, Texas receives a C in completion this year; (5) Over the past decade, Texas has increasingly benefited from having a more highly educated population. This year Texas receives a B- in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Texas received an Incomplete in learning because there are no comparable data that would allow for meaningful state-by-state comparisons in learning. This report also includes additional information, questions and answers, state grades, and &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; resources. [For &quot;Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED508096.]
Measuring Up 2004: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Tennessee
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2004-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment

This state report card is derived from &quot;Measuring Up 2004,&quot; the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately are students in each state being prepared for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates and degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive as a result of having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Tennessee include: (1) Over the past decade, Tennessee has made notable improvement in preparing students to succeed in college. Despite that improvement, Tennessee lags behind many other states and receives a C- in preparation this year; (2) Tennessee has shown improvement in enrolling students in higher education over the past decade. This year, however, Tennessee receives a C- in participation because other states performed better; (3) Tennessee has made no notable progress over the past decade in providing affordable higher education opportunities. This year Tennessee is one of many states to receive an F in affordability; (4) Despite substantial improvement over the past decade, Tennessee struggles to perform well in the proportion of students earning a certificate or degree in a timely manner. This year Tennessee receives a C+ in completion; (5) Over the past decade, Tennessee has garnered greater benefits from having a more highly educated population. Despite that improvement, Tennessee receives a C in benefits this year; and (6) Like most states, Tennessee received an Incomplete in learning because there are no comparable data that would allow for meaningful state-by-state comparisons in learning. This report also includes additional information, questions and answers, state grades, and &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; resources. [For &quot;Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED508096.]
Measuring Up 2004: The State Report Card on Higher Education. Wisconsin
Author: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
Date: 2004-00-00
Type: Reports - Descriptive
Subjects: Higher Education,Postsecondary Education,Comparative Analysis,Performance Factors,Educational Improvement,Educational Change,College Preparation,Enrollment,Access to Education,Paying for College,Student Costs,Academic Persistence,Time to Degree,Graduation Rate,Educational Attainment,Outcomes of Education,Education Work Relationship,Economic Impact,Academic Achievement,Achievement Rating,Educational Indicators,Educational Assessment

This state report card is derived from &quot;Measuring Up 2004,&quot; the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation: How adequately are students in each state being prepared for education and training beyond high school?; (2) Participation: Do state residents have sufficient opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high school?; (3) Affordability: How affordable is higher education for students and their families?; (4) Completion: Do students make progress toward and complete their certificates and degrees in a timely manner?; (5) Benefits: What benefits does the state receive as a result of having a highly educated population?; and (6) Learning: What is known about student learning as a result of education and training beyond high school? Findings for Wisconsin include: (1) Over the past decade, Wisconsin has made substantial improvement in preparing students to succeed in college, but other states have seen greater gains. This year Wisconsin falls to a B+ in preparation; (2) In Wisconsin, the proportion of young adults who enroll in higher education has declined over the last decade. However, Wisconsin continues to receive a B in participation because the declines of other states were similar; (3) Wisconsin, over the past decade, has made no notable progress in providing affordable higher education opportunities. This year Wisconsin receives a D in affordability; (4) In Wisconsin, there has been a notable improvement over the past decade in the proportion of students earning their certificates or degrees in a timely manner. This year Wisconsin receives an A- in completion; (5) Despite improvement over the past decade, Wisconsin still does not garner many of the benefits of having a more highly educated population. This year Wisconsin receives a C+ in benefits; and (6) Like most states, Wisconsin received an Incomplete in learning because there are no comparable data that would allow for meaningful state-by-state comparisons in learning. This report also includes additional information, questions and answers, state grades, and &quot;Measuring Up 2004&quot; resources. [For &quot;Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education,&quot; see ED508096.]