ethanporcaro/eric-fulltext-meta huggingface dataset:
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: North Dakota
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 11,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in North Dakota. Trends at three achievement levels for white, Native American, and low-income students were mixed in grade 4 reading and showed a clear pattern of declines in grade 4 math. Trends in achievement gaps for the Native American and low-income subgroups showed a mixed picture and varied somewhat depending on which indicator of achievement was used. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: North Carolina
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in North Carolina. All major student groups showed a clear trend of gains in grade 4 math at three achievement levels. A clear trend of narrowing gaps at the proficient level was also evident in math at grades 4 and 8 for all major subgroups. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: New York
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in New York. In grade 4 math, a clear trend of rising performance was apparent for subgroups at three achievement levels, but in reading, trends were mixed. Progress in narrowing gaps was more evident in math than in reading. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: New Mexico
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 11,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in New Mexico. Grade 4 achievement trends at the proficient level showed a mixed picture for New Mexico's major student groups. Declines were more prevalent than gains in reading, while gains were more common than declines in math. Trends in achievement gaps were also mixed. In reading, gaps narrowed in nearly all cases, but in math the two indicators of achievement used in this study showed contradictory trends. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: New Jersey
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 11,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in New Jersey. At grade 4, all the major student groups in New Jersey showed clear trend of gains in math at the proficient and advanced achievement levels, but subgroup trends in reading were mixed. A clear trend of narrowing gaps was evident for all major subgroups at the elementary and high school levels. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: New Hampshire
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 11,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in New Hampshire. The three subgroups that were large enough to analyze in New Hampshire (white, Latino, and low-income students) showed a clear trend of gains in grade 4 reading and math at all three achievement levels--basic-and-above, proficient-and-above, and advanced. Achievement gaps narrowed for the Latino and low-income subgroups. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: Montana
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 10,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in Montana. The three major student groups in Montana (white, Native American, and low-income students) showed a clear trend of gains in grade 4 reading and math at all three achievement levels. A clear trend of achievement gaps narrowing was also evident in reading at all three grades analyzed, but gap trends in math showed a mixed picture. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: Missouri
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 10,Grade 11,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in Missouri. Trends for subgroups in grade 4 reading and math showed a mixed picture of gains and declines at three levels of achievement. Trends in achievement gaps were mixed--the two indicators of achievement used in this study showed contradictory gap trends. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: Mississippi
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 10,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness,High School Students

This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. Mississippi implemented new assessments at all grades in 2007-08. As a result, 2008 test data were not comparable to those from previous years. For that reason, CEP could not calculate updated trends through 2007-08 for this year's achievement study. The tables in this profile show trends through 2007. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: Minnesota
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 10,Grade 11,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in Minnesota. A clear trend of gains for nearly all student groups at all three achievement levels could be seen in math, while an opposite trend of declines for almost all groups at all three achievement levels was apparent in reading. Achievement gaps widened more often than they narrowed. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]
Subgroup Achievement and Gap Trends: Michigan
Author: Center on Education Policy
Date: 2009-10-00
Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Subjects: Federal Legislation,Low Income,American Indians,African American Students,Asian American Students,Hispanic American Students,White Students,Grade 8,Grade 4,Grade 11,English (Second Language),Disabilities,Gender Differences,Academic Achievement,Achievement Gap,Achievement Gains,High Achievement,Low Achievement,Achievement Rating,Student Evaluation,Educational Assessment,Reading Achievement,Mathematics Achievement,Evaluation Methods,Outcomes of Education,Educational Indicators,Federal Programs,Scores,Achievement Tests,Educational Testing,Educational Trends,Trend Analysis,Accountability,Educational Policy,Educational Improvement,Program Evaluation,Program Effectiveness,State Programs,School Effectiveness

This year the Center on Education Policy analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between these groups at the proficient level across three grades (grade 4, grade 8 in most cases, and a high school grade). These two types of analyses show whether elementary school achievement has generally gone up for different groups of students and whether achievement gaps at different grade levels have narrowed, widened, or stayed the same. This paper profiles the student subgroup achievement and gap trends in Michigan. All subgroups showed a clear trend of gains in grade 4 reading and math at all three achievement levels except at the basic level in reading, where declines occurred for several subgroups. Trends in achievement gaps were mixed--the two indicators of achievement used in this study showed contradictory gap trends. (Contains 9 tables.) [For the main report, &quot;State Test Score Trends through 2007-08, Part 3: Are Achievement Gaps Closing and Is Achievement Rising for All?&quot;, see ED507909.]