Premise: The only conceivable argument that can be made for distinguishing Rust is that there even patients who wished to receive abortion counseling could receive the nonabortion services that the Government-funded clinic offered, whereas here some potential LSC clients who wish to receive representation on a benefits claim that does not challenge the statutes will be unable to do so because their cases raise a reform claim that an LSC lawyer may not present.

Hypothesis: All potential LSC clients will receive representation regardless of whether or not their claim challenges statutes or is a reform claim.
Relation: contradiction