Premise: Cities need to be replaced with a new idea such as a super sized mall type building with no need for travel or cars.

Hypothesis: large building with no need for travel or cars is an idea that is needed
Relation: entailment

Hypothesis: Cities are outdated; a superstructure such as a giant mall would serve the same purpose and cut down on energy costs.
Relation: entailment

Hypothesis: Cities need to stay the same
Relation: contradiction

Hypothesis: there are some things that could be done to reduce transit time and cost
Relation: neutral

Hypothesis: The city does not have people that live there.
Relation: contradiction

Hypothesis: Plans are being made for future cities without the use of buses.
Relation: neutral

Hypothesis: replacing cities with large building and no need for travel or cars is a good idea and can help more than it can hurt.
Relation: neutral

Hypothesis: Cities are perfectly fine and never need to be changed.
Relation: contradiction

Hypothesis: A well-known professor is giving a speech on new ideas for futuristic cities; one of these ideas is to replace them with large complexes.
Relation: neutral

Hypothesis: large all inclusive buildings could reduce travel.
Relation: entailment

Hypothesis: Cities need new ideas that involve less travel.
Relation: entailment

Hypothesis: The city right now has cars.
Relation: entailment

Hypothesis: cities are fine the way they are
Relation: contradiction

Hypothesis: The city has a mall.
Relation: neutral

Hypothesis: we should continue using cars and long distance for travel because cities don't need giant mall type buildings.
Relation: contradiction