## 4 Discussion  
In our study, we focused on evaluating the impact of the implementation of Fitlight technology in the process of sports training and motor assessment on the improvement in agility and reactive agility of junior basketball players. The results of this study reflect significant progress in the experimental group between the final and initial testing. Likewise, the progress in the experimental group was statistically significantly superior to that of the control group, which proves that the implementation of the experimental program in which we used Fitlight technology was effective for both categories of U14 and U16 basketball players. The results of our study confirm the hypotheses of previous studies and \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Agility Test**} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Levene’s Test**} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**_t-Test for Equality of Means_**} \\ \cline{2-11}  & **Groups** & **Test** & **F** & **Sig.** & **t** & **df** & **_p_ & **Mean Diff.** & **SED** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**95\% CI**} \\ \cline{3-11}  & **G**E-GC & It & 7.08 & 0.01 & 4.22 & 32.00 & 0.00 & 1.43 & 0.34 & 0.74 & 2.12 \\ \cline{2-11}  & GE-GC & Ft & 0.93 & 0.34 & 0.83 & 32.00 & 0.41 & 0.17 & 0.21 & \(-\)0.25 & 0.59 \\ \cline{2-11}  & GE-GC & It & 9.43 & 0.00 & 3.53 & 32.00 & 0.00 & 1.99 & 0.56 & 0.84 & 3.14 \\ \cline{2-11} T agility test with ball & GE-GC & Ft & 6.23 & 0.02 & 1.00 & 32.00 & 0.32 & 0.33 & 0.33 & \(-\)0.34 & 1.01 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{T reactive agility test} & GE-GC & It & 11.16 & 0.00 & 4.84 & 32.00 & 0.00 & 2.01 & 0.41 & 1.16 & 2.85 \\ \cline{2-11}  & GE-GC & Ft & 2.85 & 0.10 & 1.15 & 32.00 & 0.26 & 0.31 & 0.27 & \(-\)0.24 & 0.85 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{T reactive agility test with ball} & GE-GC & It & 12.39 & 0.00 & 4.13 & 32.00 & 0.00 & 3.56 & 0.86 & 1.80 & 5.32 \\ \cline{2-11}  & GE-GC & Ft & 4.36 & 0.04 & 1.94 & 32.00 & 0.06 & 0.69 & 0.35 & \(-\)0.04 & 1.41 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Illinois agility test} & GE-GC & It & 1.37 & 0.25 & 8.64 & 32.00 & 0.00 & 3.44 & 0.40 & 2.63 & 4.25 \\ \cline{2-11}  & GE-GC & Ft & 2.14 & 0.15 & 8.40 & 32.00 & 0.00 & 2.33 & 0.28 & 1.76 & 2.89 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Illinois agility test with ball} & GE-GC & It & 4.24 & 0.05 & 8.74 & 32.00 & 0.00 & 3.98 & 0.46 & 3.06 & 4.91 \\ \cline{2-11}  & GE-GC & Ft & 0.57 & 0.46 & 7.45 & 32.00 & 0.00 & 2.14 & 0.29 & 1.55 & 2.72 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Independent samples T test for the U16 control and experimental groups in the (It) and (Ft). contribute to the expansion of knowledge regarding the impact of Fitlight technology on improving agility by implementing an experimental program in which specific basketball exercises were adapted to this technology [30; 31; 32; 33; 34]. Analyzing recent research, we identified a series of studies with aligning our study and its relevant results [8; 47; 48]. [PERSON] [8] delves into the efficacy of the Fitlight Training System in improving agility and performance in young basketball players. The common thread is their focus on the innovative use of technology--specifically, the Fitlight system--to enhance agility and overall athletic performance, underscoring a burgeoning interest in incorporating technological tools in sports training regimes. We provide a broader view of agility's role in basketball, examining the impact of Fitlight training on overall agility and comparing it with traditional training methods. This comparative approach gives a comprehensive understanding of how traditional training measures up against more technologically advanced methods. In our study, we approached the development of agility through the use of information technologies on different age groups, U14 and U16. In contrast, [PERSON] [8] narrows its focus, concentrating on the specific impacts of reactive agility exercises on visual reaction time and dribbling skills, adding depth to our understanding of how Fitlight training can target and enhance specific skills crucial for basketball.