## 3 Results  
The descriptive statistics for the SLCM] kinetic and kinematic variables, as well as the isometric hip maximal and explosive strength variables, are presented in Table 1. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Test** & **Variable Name** & **Mean (SD)** & **Maximum** & **Minimum** \\ \hline SLCM] & Height (m) & 0.18 (0.03) & 0.26 & 0.12 \\ \hline Hip & Abduction (Nm/kg\({}^{0.67}\)) & 8.51 (1.59) & 12.67 & 4.73 \\ MVIC & Adduction (Nm/kg\({}^{0.67}\)) & 9.90 (2.27) & 16.50 & 3.52 \\ variables & Flexion (Nm/kg\({}^{0.67}\)) & 10.10 (2.23) & 15.17 & 2.68 \\  & Extension (Nm/kg\({}^{0.67}\)) & 10.09 (2.31) & 15.65 & 3.90 \\ \hline Hip & Abduction (Nm/kg\({}^{0.67}\)/s) & 34.59 (18.56) & 85.70 & 2.73 \\ RTD & Adduction (Nm/kg\({}^{0.67}\)/s) & 44.49 (22.24) & 98.34 & 3.64 \\ variables & Flexion (Nm/kg\({}^{0.67}\)/s) & 59.68 (33.00) & 158.71 & 5.84 \\  & Extension (Nm/kg\({}^{0.67}\)/s) & 38.99 (22.18) & 104.52 & 1.74 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Descriptive statistics of single-leg counter movement jump kinetic and kinematic variables and isometric hip strength variables. Figure 3: Presentation of relative (**a**) and absolute (**b**) kinematic variables in the frontal plane. Figure 4 shows the correlation analysis results between the SLCMJ kinematic and kinetic variables and hip maximal and explosive strength. A moderate negative correlation was observed between SLCMJ height and femur inclination in the frontal plane (r = \(-\)0.30; 95% CI from \(-\)0.496 to \(-\)0.082; \(p\) < 0.05). In the sagittal plane, hip angle demonstrated a moderate, negative, and statistically significant correlation with MVIC ABD (r = \(-\)0.23; 95% CI from \(-\)0.431 to \(-\)0.003; \(p\) < 0.05). Femur inclination exhibited a moderate, positive correlation with MVIC ABD (r = 0.27; 95% CI from 0.043 to 0.464; \(p\) < 0.05). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline
**Test** & **Variable Name** & **Mean (SD)** & **Maximum** & **Minimum** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Sagittal plane} & Knee angle (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 113.95 (6.78) & 131.67 & 99.18 \\  & Hip angle (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 108.06 (10.02) & 144.08 & 93.06 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Shin inclination (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 30.98 (3.54) & 40.64 & 25.43 \\ \cline{1-1}   variables & Femur inclination (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 35.21 (5.54) & 47.82 & 18.93 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Trunk inclination (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 38.31 (9.23) & 63.52 & 13.02 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Frontal plane kinematic variables} & Knee angle (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 172.14 (4.87) & 178.76 & 159.15 \\  & Hip angle (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 77.02 (11.33) & 88.83 & 21.88 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Trunk angle (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 110.98 (14.38) & 169.87 & 91.61 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Shin inclination (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 6.69 (4.13) & 19.06 & 0.55 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Femur inclination (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 8.91 (4.85) & 19.86 & 0.17 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Pelvis inclination (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 81.86 (11.74) & 89.62 & 26.37 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Trunk inclination (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 21.15 (12.88) & 71.53 & 5.10 \\ \hline \end{tabular} SLCMJ—single-leg countermovement jump; MVIC—maximal voluntary isometric strength; and RTD—rate of torque development during explosive isometric contractions.  
\end{table} 
Table 1: _Cont._  
Figure 4: Correlations between single-leg countermovement jump height, hip maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) variables, hip rate of torque development (RTD) variables, and kinematic variables obtained from frontal and sagittal planes. ABD—hip abduction; ADD—hip adduction; *—statistically significant correlation (\(p\) < 0.05). In the frontal plane, kinematic variables also showed statistically significant correlations with hip strength. Shin inclination was moderately and positively correlated with MVIC ABD (r = 0.23; 95% CI from 0.000 to 0.429; \(p<0.05\)).