## 4 Experiments and Results
### Models of Process of the Capacities of Self-Optimization and Self-Configuration
Tables 2 and 3 they contain all of the parameters of the protocols OLSR and AODV with their respective parameters already optimized, with the self-optimization method. That table was coupled in the self-configuration method and later the results were abstracted. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{|c|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline
**Nodes** & 0.5 & 1 & 1.5 & 2 &... & 40 & 50 \\ \hline
**SMALL (10)** & 28.41469 & 24.5938 & 24.59264 & 71.20893 & 16.16489 & 16.16489 \\ \hline
**SMALL (20)** & 1290.703 & 861.9226 & 656.1949 & 575.5491 & 248.0969 & 248.0969 \\ \hline
**SMALL (30)** & 659.5588 & 443.2582 & 340.3938 & 323.379 & 132.1309 & 132.1309 \\ \hline
**MEDIUM(40)** & 2646.458 & 1704.578 & 1303.33 & 1163.118 & 765.0526 & 765.0526 \\ \hline
**MEDIUM(60)** & 6692.721 & 3773.002 & 2860.065 & 2285.047 & 882.2232 & 837.5746 \\ \hline
**MEDIUM(70)** & 4669.589 & 2738.79 & 2081.698 & 1724.083 & 823.6379 & 801.3136 \\ \hline
**LARGE(80)** & 8583.169 & 5175.946 & 3907.206 & 3290.569 & 1620.508 & 1664.479 \\ \hline
**LARGE(90)** & 11324.1 & 6876.763 & 5405.711 & 4612.651 & 2375.319 & 2165.133 \\ \hline
**LARGE(100)** & 9953.633 & 6026.355 & 4656.459 & 3951.61 & 1997.914 & 1914.806 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Example of parameter hello-interval using the throughput as metric of analysis. Figure 4: Example of the analysis of the scales of the parameter Hello-Interval according to the metric of throughput and the variation of the interval of time. Besides the specific analysis of the five parameters some other parameters were also modified to privilege the network according to the scale. As an example of that, the parameter Node-Willingness can be mentioned that takes part of the group of parameters of the protocol OLSR. In this parameter it was configured for _medium_ in the small scale, _high_ for medium scale and _always_ for large scale, that it is to direct the traffic of the own node to the other nodes to conform the _Willingness_ appropriately. It was observed that way that the network grows is interesting to leave the parameter _Willingness_ to direct the whole traffic always. Already in the AODV protocol the parameters that were modified are: grat-route-reply-flag (_true_ for small scale, _false_ for medium and large scale), dest-only-flag (_true_ for small scale, _false_ for medium scale and _true_ for large scale), ackrequired (_true_ for small scale, _true_ for medium scale and _false_ for large scale), local_repair(_true_ for small scale, _true_ for medium scale and _false_ for large scale). Already the parameters ttl's were maintained the same ones as the original values. These changes in those parameters contributed to privilege some moments in the network, for instance, the parameter ack-required, in this parameter, the need is verified to guarantee a return of an ACK (_acknowledgment_) only in the small and medium scales, because in the large scale if it doesn't turn necessary the sending of an ACK, because in this case it can get a great accumulation of messages of ACK in the network. This same concept of the ack-required was used for other above mentioned parameters. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline OLSR Parameters & Standard & Small & Medium & Large \\ \hline node\_willingness & default & medium & high & always \\ \hline
**hello\_interval** & 2.0 & 8.7311 & 2.9802 & 2.8312 \\ \hline
**t\_interval** & 5 & 1.3388 & 0.0588 & 9.8348 \\ \hline
**neighbor\_hold\_time** & 6 & 2.2383 & 1.6764 & 1.4107 \\ \hline
**tc\_hold\_time** & 15 & 4.0745 & 3.7253 & 2.6822 \\ \hline
**dup\_hold\_time** & 30 & 20 & 35 & 10 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Description of OLSR protocol parameters after of self-optimization process.