# Example usage calculate_urban_resilience('input_file_name')
## 6 Discussion  
This study's exploration of the Risk-Informed Asset-Centric (RIACT) decision-making process has provided a nuanced understanding of urban resilience, specifically in the context of earthquake preparedness and mitigation in Portugal. By utilizing an entropy weighting algorithm and extensive data gathering, our study has successfully mapped the diverse landscape of earthquake risks, exposure, vulnerabilities, and resilience across Portuguese municipalities. This granular approach has highlighted the complex nature of seismic hazards and the importance of tailored resilience strategies.  
One of the most significant findings of this study is the clear demonstration of regional variations in earthquake risk within Portugal. This heterogeneity underscores the need for region-specific resilience planning, moving beyond one-size-fits-all solutions. Such localized approaches enable municipalities to address their unique risk profiles effectively, ensuring that resources are allocated where they are most needed.  
The RIACT process, rooted in principles of optimized asset and risk management, emerges as a comprehensive framework for enhancing urban resilience. Its strength lies in its integrative approach, combining robust data analysis, stakeholder engagement, and continuous adaptation. This study illustrates how the RIACT process facilitates a dynamic response to seismic risks, allowing for proactive measures that enhance both the physical infrastructure and the social fabric of communities.  
A crucial aspect of this approach is the emphasis on proactive treatment plans. This study has highlighted the importance of infrastructural improvements such as upgrading building standards and enhancing water management systems, which are vital for reducing vulnerability to seismic events. However, equally important are the policy and planning measures, including the development of adaptive building codes, insurance policies, and zoning laws. These policy-level interventions can significantly strengthen the overall resilience framework.  
Continuous risk monitoring and revision stand out as key components of the RIACT process. The dynamic nature of seismic risks requires resilience strategies to be adaptive rather than static in response to new data, technological advancements, and changing environmental conditions. This adaptive approach ensures that resilience measures remain relevant and effective over time.  
Moreover, this study underscores the critical role of communication and stakeholder engagement in the resilience-building process. Establishing dialogues with local communities, government bodies, and industry experts enhances the understanding of seismic risks and the effectiveness of resilience strategies. It fosters a culture of preparedness wherein community input and expert advice shape more robust and inclusive resilience plans.  
In conclusion, this study not only contributes a methodological approach to assessing and enhancing earthquake resilience but also emphasizes the need for an ongoing, collaborative effort in resilience planning. The insights from this study advocate for a dynamic, integrative approach to urban resilience, highlighting the importance of continuous adaptation, stakeholder engagement, and policy development in the face of seismic challenges. As urban areas continue to grapple with the complexities of natural disasters, the RIACT process offers a valuable framework for building more resilient, sustainable communities.