# CSNOMA: Carrier Sense Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access
## 2 Related Work
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{56.9 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt}} \hline \hline
**Paper** & **Aim** & **Proposed Solution** & **Pros** & **Cons** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[22]} & Concurrent transmissions, multipacket reception (MPR) at the receiver to combat interference & Conflict set graph for the interference with successive interference cancellation (SIC) & Improve MPR & Difficult to characterize the link interface under SINR model \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[23,24]} & Concurrent transmissions, MDR at the receiver to combat interference & & & & \\ \cline{2-5}  & Concurrent transmissions, MDR at the receiver to combat interference & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[25]} & Concurrent transmissions, MDR at the receiver to combat interference & & & & \\ \cline{2-5}  & Concurrent transmissions, MDR at the receiver to combat interference & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[26]} & Design SIC-aware MAC & Novel SIC-aware MAC protocol & Increase throughput by 1.5 & Subjected to selfish behavior of users \\ \cline{2-5}  & Close the gap between throughput capacity in the physical model & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[28]} & Comparison on successive interference cancellation and Joint detection (JD) & & & & \\ \cline{2-5}  & Cloud-driven upper and lower bounds for Transmission capacity obtained with SIC & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[29]} & Summarize new analytical tools of TC (Survey paper) & Contributions developed metric for transmission capacity & Show improvement in transmission capacity & Limited information in MAC design issue \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[31]} & Examine interaction between the physical and medium access control layers & Cross-layer design between PHY and MAC & Quantify the effectiveness of signal processing on multipacket reception & Less practical \\ \cline{2-5}  & A MAC Protocol for Multi-Packet Ad-hoc Wireless Network Utilizing Multi-Antenna packet congestion & A novel multi-antenna utilization packet congestion & Improve throughput, delay in the relay node & Only works with multiple antennas \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[33]} & MAC for MPR & Markovian analysis was used to evaluate performance & Ability to capture few packets simultaneously & Can lead to unfairness when nodes are spatially distributed \\ \cline{2-5}  & Enable the coexistence utilize the MPR capability to maximize throughput & New MPR MAC protocol & Improves throughput & Spatially random topology is not considered \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[35]} & To construct a femtocell structure based fading the frequency band & Interference management scheme in the downlink & Reduce cross-tier interference in the downlink & The performance of FUNEs decreased \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[36]} & Analysis of IC scheme in a DS/CDMA system & Analyze a simple successive interference cancellation scheme for coherent BPSK modulation & Extend the analysis for a noncoherent modulation scheme & Limited consideration on analyzing the processing delay involved and the practical implementation of the interference canceler \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[37]} & Maximize the overall capacity to estimate error & Power control strategy & Power control is a key element in allowing a SIC system to achieve high and phase of each user’s signal \\ \cline{2-5}  & High packet loss rate and poor spatial reuse & Algorithm for interference cancellation increase spatial reuse & Reduced packet loss and increase spatial reuse & Not fully combined IC \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{[39]} & Performance study of CSMA is considering packet reception & SIC provides many new transmission opportunities & Not suitable to combining IC capability \\ \cline{2-5}  & \multicolumn{1}{p{113.8 pt}}{} & \multicolumn{1}{p{113.8 pt}}{} & \multicolumn{1}{p{113.8 pt}}{} & \multicolumn{1}{p{113.8 pt}}{} \\ \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Summary of related work.