# Detection of Crustal Uplift Deformation in Response to Glacier Wastage in Southern Patagonia
## 2 Geodetic and Satellites Input Data
### ICESat Data Profiles  
The ICESat-1 mission provided multiyear elevation data for ice sheet mass balance determination from 2003 to 2009 [34]. The GLAH14 product of the GLAS/ICESat L2 Global Land Surface Altimetry data set, version 34 in HDF5 format, was used for this study (Table 2). Heights have a centimeter order vertical error [35]. All elevation data are referenced to the WGS84 ellipsoid. We downloaded the available data from 2004 to 2008 collected at the upper zone of the Upsala and Viedma glaciers (see Figure 1). These products were obtained from the official NASA website ([[https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/](https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/)]([https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/](https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/)), accessed on 21 December 2021). We estimated ice elevation changes by comparing the data profiles to the SRTM elevation model from 2000 to 2004-2009. The ICESat-2 mission has been used in several areas of the planet for monitoring the cryosphere since September 2018. Land ice heights measured through the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) represent the average height of the land ice surface averaged over -17 m ground segments and spaced 20 m apart. ATL06 processing calculates ground ice surface heights and stores them per ground track so that subsequent measurements on the same reference ground track can be easily compared. Heights are referenced to the WGS84 reference system (ITRF2014 reference frame) [36] and have a \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Laser**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Footprint Size**} \\
**File Name** & **Acquisition** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Campaign**} & \\  & **Date** & **(I(ICESat-1))** & **Major Axis Mean** & **Eccentricity Mean** \\  & & **/G GTN \({}^{*}\) Used** & \(\pm\) **St. Dev.** & \(\pm\) **St. Dev.** \\  & & **(I(ICESat-2))** & & \\ \hline GLAH14\_634\_2107\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 25 February 2004 & L2B & 89.52 \(\pm\) 4.93 & 0.822 \(\pm\) 0.045 \\  & 2107\_003\_0043\_01\_0001 & 26 May 2004 & L2C & 88.37 \(\pm\) 19.12 & 0.892 \(\pm\) 0.044 \\  & 2109\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 12 October 2004 & L3A & 55.79 \(\pm\) 0.43 & 0.567 \(\pm\) 0.043 \\  & 2111\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 27 February 2005 & L3B & 79.53 \(\pm\) 11.55 & 0.753 \(\pm\) 0.051 \\  & 2113\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 30 October 2005 & L3D & 52.04 \(\pm\) 1.06 & 0.523 \(\pm\) 0.010 \\  & 2115\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 2 March 2006 & L3E & 52.31 \(\pm\) 1.60 & 0.483 \(\pm\) 0.040 \\  & 2119\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 20 March 2007 & L3H & 55.61 \(\pm\) 0.48 & 0.521 \(\pm\) 0.019 \\  & 2121\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 11 October 2007 & L3I & 57.28 \(\pm\) 0.57 & 0.590 \(\pm\) 0.013 \\  & 2123\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 25 February 2008 & L3J & 58.66 \(\pm\) 1.52 & 0.575 \(\pm\) 0.036 \\  & 2125\_002\_0043\_01\_0001 & 12 October 2008 & L3K & 51.99 \(\pm\) 1.12 & 0.611 \(\pm\) 0.036 \\ \hline ATL06\_20181126060903\_08950109\_005.01 & 26 November 2018 & 1-2-3-4-5-6 & & \\
2019020150630361031203\_005.01 & 6 February 2019 & 1-2-3-5-6 & & \\
20190225014905890200\_005.01 & 25 February 2019 & 3-4-5-6 & & \\
20190508104610631031303\_005.01 & 8 May 2019 & 1-2-3-4-5-6 & & \\
201905262128408950309\_005.01 & 26 May 2019 & 1-2-3-4-5-6 & & \\
2019080706255106130413\_005.01 & 7 August 2019 & 1-2-3-4-5-6 & 17 m \\
20190825170829\_08950409\_005.01 & 25 August 2019 & 1-2-3-4-5-6 & & \\
20190905050156\_105505413\_005.01 & 5 September 2019 & 1-2-3-4-5-6 & & \\
20190923154435\_13370409\_005.01 & 23 September 2019 & 6 & & \\
2019112412821\_08950509\_005.01 & 24 November 2019 & 3-4-5-6 & & \\
20191205004146\_10550513\_005.01 & 5 December 2019 & 1-2-3-4-5-6 & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \({}^{*}\)GTN, Ground Track Number. This table was constructed using the metadata included in the HDF5 files and the official metadata table provided by the ICESat Science Investigator-led Processing System (I-SIPS), 2014.  
\end{table} 
Table 2: ICESat profiles database. vertical precision of centimeter order [37]. For this study we selected data collected from November 2018 to November 2019 (Table 2).