## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Outcome Measure** & \begin{tabular}{c} **HOME Group** \\ **(_n = 10_)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Change Score** \\ **from Baseline** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **CON Group** \\ **(_n = 8_)** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Change Score** \\ **from Baseline** \\ \end{tabular} & _p-Value_ \\ \hline
**Primary outcomes** & & & & & \\ \hline MDS-UPDRS motor part (score) & \(20.67\pm 8.25\) & \(1.16\pm 0.82\) & \(23.50\pm 10.62\) & \(-0.33\pm 0.23\) & \(0.237\) \\ \hline MDS-UPDRS rigidity item (score) & \(1.67\pm 0.71\) & \(0.43\pm 0.30\) & \(2.67\pm 0.52\) & \(-0.47\pm 0.33\) & \(0.017\) * \\ \hline Functional axial rotation-physical (cm) & \(120.79\pm 71.22\) & \(-19.77\pm 13.98\) & \(78.84\pm 47.86\) & \(19.53\pm 13.81\) & \(0.059\) \\ \hline Gait characteristics & & & & \\ Foot rotation (deg) & \(12.86\pm 6.53\) & \(-2.7\pm 1.91\) & \(11.53\pm 8.16\) & \(-0.88\pm 0.62\) & \(0.534\) \\ Step width (cm) & \(13.20\pm 6.11\) & \(-1.1\pm 0.78\) & \(13.13\pm 4.29\) & \(-1.5\pm 1.06\) & \(0.964\) \\ Step length (cm) & \(40.13\pm 17.76\) & \(-17.49\pm 12.37\) & \(22.04\pm 12.10\) & \(-0.76\pm 0.54\) & \(0.033\) * \\ Step time (s) & \(1.46\pm 1.03\) & \(-0.41\pm 0.29\) & \(1.29\pm 0.65\) & \(0.01\pm 0.01\) & \(0.059\) \\ Cadence (steps/min) & \(87.20\pm 6.96\) & \(-13.4\pm 9.48\) & \(83.38\pm 16.15\) & \(-11.13\pm 7.87\) & \(0.350\) \\ Gait velocity (km/s) & \(1.88\pm 0.60\) & \(-0.84\pm 0.59\) & \(0.90\pm 0.55\) & \(0.04\pm 0.03\) & \(0.023\) * \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{l}{**Secondary outcomes**} \\ \hline Functional Reach Test (cm) & \(33.62\pm 8.78\) & \(-2.53\pm 1.79\) & \(30.33\pm 9.51\) & \(-0.88\pm 0.62\) & \(0.723\) \\ \hline Time Up and Go (s) & \(16.49\pm 6.58\) & \(1.37\pm 0.97\) & \(15.27\pm 5.82\) & \(1\pm 0.71\) & \(0.960\) \\ \hline Gait speed (m/s) & & & & \\ Normal speed & \(0.99\pm 0.35\) & \(-0.19\pm 0.13\) & \(0.79\pm 0.18\) & \(-0.01\pm 0.01\) & \(0.239\) \\ Fast speed & \(1.13\pm 0.39\) & \(-0.1\pm 0.07\) & \(0.99\pm 0.17\) & \(0.05\pm 0.04\) & \(0.637\) \\ \hline Fall Efficacy Scale-International (score) & \(18.56\pm 7.57\) & \(1.55\pm 1.10\) & \(22.17\pm 7.52\) & \(-2.34\pm 1.65\) & \(0.047\) * \\ \hline The global rating of change (score) & \(1\pm 1.58\) & \(0.5\pm 1.76\) & & \(0.361\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Comparison of primary and secondary outcomes and the changes between groups. Values are mean \(\pm\) standard deviation. Boollet and Telephone Follow up Reporting during the 10 Week Exercise Period  
During the 10-week period, four participants in the HOME group did not perform the exercises from the booklet and video during the first week (as noted from the diary records). The researcher had to call and remind those participants and their caregivers to carry out the exercise regime every day. In addition, it was discovered that six participants completed the exercises regularly and, in addition, carried out other activities, such as going to the shopping centre, doing housework, and watering plants. This may have improved their scores in the assessments. These activities may have also increased their motivation to complete the exercises and enabled them to do more. Another two participants frequently spent long periods in the sitting and lying-down position but still completed the exercises three times a week.