## 4 Tests and Results
### Input Data  
The IEEE-39 RTS system has 10 generators whose characteristics are presented in Table 2. An evaluation period of four hours with a granularity of 5 min is considered, which is equivalent to 55 periods of time. Table 3 shows the loads associated with the test system; the evaluated scenario considers a total blackout. For this case study, three solar and three wind-type generators were chosen, whose parameters are shown in Table 4.  
The historical and forecast statistical data used to perform simulations were taken from different wind and PV generators operated by the TSO of Netherlands Elia Group [34]. The information selected to carry out the experimental tests corresponds to both the historical data series of 8 March 2020 from 00:00 to 08:30 h of 22 March 2020 with a granularity of 15 min; as well as the solar and PV generation prediction series for 22 March from 08:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. with a granularity of 5 min. These data are the input to the  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l l} \hline \hline
**rv** & **Type** & \(\mathbf{P_{restart}}\) **[MW]** & \(\mathbf{P_{remax}}\) **[MW]** & \(\mathbf{\overline{P}_{rvforec}}\) & \(\mathbf{p(v)_{rrforec}}\) & \(\mathbf{\overline{P}_{rbristmed}}\) & \(\mathbf{p(v)_{rbrist}}\) \\ \hline
1 & Wind 1 & 6 & 339.75 & 56.84 & 0.535 & 37.52 & 0.564 \\ \hline
2 & Wind 2 & 9 & 235.25 & 118.15 & 0.514 & 68.44 & 0.561 \\ \hline
3 & Wind 3 & 12 & 104.5 & 174.98 & 0.584 & 105.96 & 0.541 \\ \hline
4 & PV 1 & 6 & 132.65 & 78.17 & 0.486 & 38.76 & 0.549 \\ \hline
5 & PV 2 & 3 & 54.59 & 34.3 & 0.52 & 15.66 & 0.535 \\ \hline
6 & PV 3 & 5 & 98.17 & 57.67 & 0.469 & 29.33 & 0.28 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 4: Parameters of NCRES units.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l l l} \hline \hline
**i** & **Type** & \(\mathbf{T_{ctp}}\) **[h]** & \(\mathbf{T_{cmin}}\) **[h]** & \(\mathbf{T_{cmax}}\) **[h]** & \(\mathbf{Rr}\) **[MW/h]** & \(\mathbf{P_{start}}\) **[MW]** & \(\mathbf{P_{max}}\) **[MW]** & \(\mathbf{ Inertia}\) **[s]** \\ \hline
1 & NBS & 00:35 & 00:40 & N/A & 215 & 5.5 & 520 & 2.6 \\ \hline
2 & NBS & 00:35 & N/A & N/A & 246 & 8 & 650 & 2.8 \\ \hline
3 & NBS & 00:35 & N/A & 02:00 & 236 & 7 & 632 & 3.0 \\ \hline
4 & NBS & 00:35 & 01:10 & N/A & 198 & 5 & 508 & 2.8 \\ \hline
5 & NBS & 00:35 & N/A & 01:00 & 244 & 8 & 650 & 3.0 \\ \hline
6 & NBS & 00:35 & N/A & N/A & 214 & 6 & 560 & 2.8 \\ \hline
7 & NBS & 00:35 & N/A & N/A & 210 & 6 & 540 & 3.0 \\ \hline
8 & NBS & 00:35 & N/A & N/A & 346 & 13.2 & 830 & 2.8 \\ \hline
9 & NBS & 00:35 & N/A & N/A & 384 & 15 & 1000 & 3.0 \\ \hline
10 & BS & 00:15 & N/A & N/A & 162 & 0 & 250 & 3.5 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 2: Generation parameters of the IEEE-39 RTS sytem.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l} \hline \hline
**Node** & **Priority** & \(\mathbf{Pl_{load}}\) **[MW]** & **Node** & **Priority** & \(\mathbf{Pl_{load}}\) **[MW]** \\ \hline
3 & 1 & 322 & 23 & 11 & 247 \\ \hline
4 & 2 & 500 & 24 & 12 & 309 \\ \hline
7 & 3 & 234 & 25 & 13 & 224 \\ \hline
8 & 4 & 522 & 26 & 14 & 139 \\ \hline
12 & 5 & 8 & 27 & 15 & 158 \\ \hline
15 & 6 & 320 & 28 & 16 & 206 \\ \hline
16 & 7 model illustrated in Figure 7. The parameters of BESS are presented in Table 5, where \(b\) stands for battery.  
The proposed optimization model was implemented under three scenarios: (1) only conventional generation, (2) NCRES and conventional generation, and (3) all technologies (conventional generation, NCRES, and BESS).