## 3 Results and Discussion
### Selection according to Cannabidiol Content
CW21-1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, and 16 varieties showed lower plant height than the mother plant. Table 4 shows the results of measuring CBD production per unit meter based on morphological data, additionally measured dried leaf and infloresence weight, and average cannabinoid content of flowers and leaves of the whole plant. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Plant Name**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Total CBD Content (g, CBD + CBDA)**} \\ \cline{2-4}  & **Leaf** & **Influorescence** & **Total** \\ \hline Mother plant & 2.663 \(\pm\) 0.211  & 23.612 \(\pm\) 0.861  & 26.275 \(\pm\) 0.724  \\ \hline CW21-1 & 7.791 \(\pm\) 0.354  & 30.310 \(\pm\) 0.434  & 38.102 \(\pm\) 0.457  \\ CW21-2 & 1.751 \(\pm\) 0.133  & 11.913 \(\pm\) 0.060  & 13.663 \(\pm\) 0.119  \\ CW21-3 & 8.680 \(\pm\) 0.297  & 20.916 \(\pm\) 0.451  & 29.596 \(\pm\) 0.441  \\ CW21-4 & 9.865 \(\pm\) 0.188  & 23.440 \(\pm\) 0.510  & 33.304 \(\pm\) 0.444  \\ CW21-5 & 14.936 \(\pm\) 0.266  & 38.066 \(\pm\) 0.088  & 53.002 \(\pm\) 0.228  \\ CW21-6 & 0.505 \(\pm\) 0.037  & 5.767 \(\pm\) 0.174  & 6.272 \(\pm\) 0.145  \\ CW21-7 & 1.823 \(\pm\) 0.157  & 14.637 \(\pm\) 0.354  & 16.460 \(\pm\) 0.316  \\ CW21-8 & 1.040 \(\pm\) 0.104  & 8.313 \(\pm\) 0.396  & 9.353 \(\pm\) 0.334  \\ CW21-9 & 1.238 \(\pm\) 0.104  & 14.759 \(\pm\) 0.069  & 15.998 \(\pm\) 0.102  \\ CW21-10 & 2.831 \(\pm\) 0.097  & 15.219 \(\pm\) 0.160  & 18.050 \(\pm\) 0.153  \\ CW21-11 & 1.016 \(\pm\) 0.149  & 3.619 \(\pm\) 0.186  & 4.635 \(\pm\) 0.194  \\ CW21-12 & 4.096 \(\pm\) 0.128  & 14.991 \(\pm\) 0.189  & 19.087 \(\pm\) 0.187  \\ CW21-13 & 4.248 \(\pm\) 0.096  & 12.104 \(\pm\) 0.306  & 16.352 \(\pm\) 0.262  \\ CW21-14 & 0.661 \(\pm\) 0.011  & 5.745 \(\pm\) 0.095  & 6.406 \(\pm\) 0.078  \\ CW21-15 & 1.840 \(\pm\) 0.075  & 3.314 \(\pm\) 0.030  & 5.154 \(\pm\) 0.066  \\ CW21-16 & 1.184 \(\pm\) 0.095  & 8.099 \(\pm\) 0.303  & 9.283 \(\pm\) 0.259  \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
Means with different letters varied significantly with DMRT (Duncan’s Multiple Range Test) at the 5% level (\(p<0.05\)) within the same part of the plant. After harvesting all leaves or flowers, they were ground and homogenized, and random sampling was performed using the cone quadrant method. The morphological data used for calculation were average values.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: Total CBD content per cubic meter. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Plant Line**} & **Plant** & **Leaf** & **Leaf** & **Leaf** & **Branch** & **Tism** & **Inf. ** & **Inf. ** & **Petiole** & **Slem** & **Whole Plant** \\  & **(fem)** & **(fem)** & **Width** & **Number** & **Diameter** & **Number** & **Length** (fem)** & **Color** & **Diameter** \\  & **(fem)** & **(fem)** & **(fem)** & **(fem)** & **Number** & **(mm)** & **Number** & **(fem)** & **(fem)** & **(fem)** \\ \hline Mother plant & 78.1 \(\pm\) 5.1 & 12 \(\pm\) 2 & 1.1 \(\pm\) 0.3 & 17 \(\pm\) 2 & 10.17 \(\pm\) 3.70 & 410 \(\pm\) 112 & **++++** & 40 & 0 & 60 \(\pm\) 11 \\ \hline CW21-1 & 44.1 \(\pm\) 4.3 & 18 \(\pm\) 2 & 3.2 \(\pm\) 0.6 & 12 \(\pm\) 3 & 15.40 \(\pm\) 3.12 & 198 \(\pm\) 25 & ++ & 60 & 5 & 66 \(\pm\) 5 \\ CW21-2 & 52.5 \(\pm\) 8.1 & 12 \(\pm\) 3 & 3.0 \(\pm\) 0.6 & 10 The CW21-5 hybrid showed the highest total CBD production per cubic meter at 53.002 \(\pm\) 0.228 g/m\({}^{3}\); the second-highest yielding line was CW21-1 (38.102 \(\pm\) 0.457 g/m\({}^{3}\)), and the third was CW21-4 (33.304 \(\pm\) 0.444 g/m\({}^{3}\)). As a result of breeding for the F1 generation for the purpose of CBD production under artificial nutrient solution culture conditions, the CW21-5 line among the clones provided the most suitable results.