## 2 Current State of Knowledge
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt}} \hline \hline
**S. No 1** & **Category** & **Remark** & **Weight** \\ \hline
1 & Management & Commissioning, construction site impact, safety & 12 \\ \hline
2 & Health and comfort & Lighting, thermal comfort, sound, indoor air and water quality, lighting & 15 \\ \hline
3 & Energy & Carbon dioxide emissions, low or zero carbon technologies, energy metering, building energy efficiency systems & 19 \\ \hline
4 & Transportation & Bus connection, non-motor vehicle facilities, convenient municipal facilities, surrounding facilities index & 8 \\ \hline
5 & Water & Water consumption, leak detection, and water recycling & 6 \\ \hline
6 & Materials & Material recycling, reuse, procurement range, high performance materials & 12.5 \\ \hline
7 & Waste & Construction waste, recycled aggregate, recycling facilities & 7.5 \\ \hline
8 & Land use and ecology & Site selection, ecological function protection, mitigation/enhancement of ecological value & 10 \\ \hline
9 & Contamination & Refrigerant use and leakage, flood risk, NOx emissions, river pollution, external light and noise pollution & 10 \\ \hline
10 & Innovation & Excellent management level, BREEAM AP, new technology and new process & 10 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Weights in CSH. of future adjustment of the UK residential building code. BREEAM has certified more than 425,000 programs, and 1.9 million registered programs in 60 countries, and it has a profound impact on other sustainable building evaluation systems, promoting the development of sustainable buildings [34]. However, the system does not specify a construction phase to be evaluated, and most buildings focus on the design phase instead of the operational phase [43]. The concept of sustainable building was first introduced in China in the 1990s. During the learning process, the China Ministry of Construction formulated the evaluation standard for the first time in 2006, namely the sustainable building evaluation standard ESGB (GB/t50378-2006) [11]. It was also the first national standard system for evaluating sustainable buildings in China. The standard continued to improve, with LEED as a reference [39]. ESGB version 2006 and version 2014 are compared and contrasted in Table 3[11]. Currently, ESGB 2014 (GB/t50378-2014) is in use. Each type of indicator includes control items and scoring items, with a total score of 100. In order to encourage technological innovation and improvement of sustainable buildings, the evaluation index system also uniformly rates innovation projects [5]. It gives a score of one to three, based on its performance using seven criteria. The main evaluation criteria are based on the following indicators: preserving land and the outdoor environment, saving and utilizing energy, saving and utilizing water, saving and utilizing materials, indoor environmental quality, and operation management, using the original standard, while the newly revised standard adds construction management to effectively cover the whole life cycle [34]. The assessment criteria assign the highest weight to energy efficiency. With the improvement of China's environmental protection awareness, this assessment standard is in line with China's national conditions [44].