## 4 Results
### Frequency Analysis  
Figure 1 demonstrates that 80.55% of respondents believe that management's commitment to the agile process's organizational component has an influence on the overall estimated cost and effort. At the same time, 19.44% are undecided, indicating that the agile approach's commitment has an impact on costs and efforts. This demonstrates that under agile methodology, increasing the amount of accountability for efficient project management reduces costs and improves overall project results. Figure 2 shows that 80.55% of respondents agreed with the assertion that process tracking in the agile approach had an influence on product delivery, while 13.89% were undecided. The remaining 5.56% are opposed to the idea. So, management might be able to keep a better eye on how the project is going if they use an agile method that makes it easy to spot mistakes and fix them quickly. Figure 3 shows that 72% of respondents believe that the agile approach guarantees that project planning and design generate successful outputs. The remaining 5.56% disagreed with the notion that the agile approach delivers practical outcomes, while 11.11% remained indifferent. As a result, the gap between designing and planning a project well before putting it into action may be filled by an agile approach, which reduces the likelihood of disputes during project management. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline \hline
**Cronbach’s Alpha** \\ \hline
0.7749 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Agile Cronbach’s value. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline _Do You Know about Lean?_ & _Count_ & _Percent_ & _Compact_ \\ \hline No & 64 & 61.54 & 61.54 \\ Yes & 40 & 38.46 & 100 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Do you know about lean methodology?According to Figure 4, 63.89% of respondents agreed with the assertion that the participation of the customer in the agile process influences the overall anticipated cost and effort, while 27.78% were undecided. The remaining 8.33% disagreed with the assertion, implying that the client's presence influences costs and efforts. This indicates that the agile methodology provides customer presence throughout the project's design, planning, and execution, resulting in client engagement in project deliverables and ensuring client satisfaction. Figure 1: Frequency analysis. Figure 3: Proper planning and designing with agile methodology. Figure 2: Progress tracking with agile methodology. A full set of accurate, agile practices in the technical component of agile processes leads to a wonderful working project, according to Figure 5. The remaining 2.78% disagreed, showing that the agile approach's technological aspects may assist a project to achieve its goals. Finally, the result addresses the project management gap that causes delays. Using a full set of agile approaches, the project may be segmented and the required quantities, resources, and prices determined. It may then be delivered implant-approved to reduce errors, project delays, and completion time. With 13.89% unsure and 2.78% disagreeing, 83.33% agreed that risk management analysis is important and influences costs and efforts (Figure 6). According to the data, avoiding risk detection and mitigation is one of the key project management shortcomings. In order to reduce the project's hazardous effects, the project manager must prepare a risk analysis chart containing impact and probability analysis. Figure 7 reveals that 82.5% of respondents feel that management creates a clear plan for team members to understand the project's long-term vision and goals, while 7.5% are unsure. The remaining 2.5% disagree. According to the research, a lack of vision and clarity may limit the project's scope and make it harder to define deliverables. Figure 8 indicates that 70% of the respondents have agreed that lean methodology helps in proper project scheduling, whereas 20% have remained neutral; the remaining 10% have disagreed with the statement.