## 4 Results  
### Examination of the Quality of E-Learning in Polish Universities  
In the first stage of the research, the quality level of e-learning classes in the surveyed universities was measured. For all fourteen analyzed variables in Table 2, basic statistical indicators such as mean, median, and standard deviation were presented. The variables were evaluated on a five-point scale from 1 to 5. The following semantic scale was used to interpret the indicator values:  
* \(<\)4.5-5\(>\)--very good;
* \((4\)-4.5\()\)--good;
* \(<\)3-4\(>\)--average;
* \((2\)-3\()\)--bad;
* \(<\)1-2\(>\)--very bad. The conducted research shows that in light of the adopted semantic scale, three variables were assessed at a good level. The variable rated highest was Q14--logging into the e-learning platform--given a score of 4.38, with a relatively low standard deviation and a median of 5. In second place was the assessment of the ease of using the e-learning platform--Q13. In the case of this variable, the respondents assessed it at the level of 4.20; in its case the median was the same as the previous one, which was 5. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l c c} \hline \hline
**Symbol** & **Variables** & **Average** & **Median** & **Standard Deviation** \\ \hline Q1 & The university supports students in the e-learning process & 3.41 & 3.00 & 1.20 \\ \hline Q2 & E-learning is an effective way of learning & 3.41 & 4.00 & 1.35 \\ \hline Q3 & E-learning allows one to acquire knowledge & 3.78 & 4.00 & 1.20 \\ \hline Q4 & E-learning allows one to verify knowledge & 3.34 & 3.00 & 1.34 \\ \hline Q5 & E-learning allows one to easily access academic teachers & 3.43 & 3.00 & 1.26 \\ \hline Q6 & E-learning materials are of high quality & 3.54 & 4.00 & 1.14 \\ \hline Q7 & The e-learning tools used by the university are accessible & 3.88 & 4.00 & 1.04 \\ \hline Q8 & Academic teachers are helpful to students (in the context of & & \\ e-learning) & 3.59 & 4.00 & 1.14 \\ \hline Q9 & Academic teachers are competent (in the context of e-learning) & 3.48 & 4.00 & 1.13 \\ \hline Q10 & Academic teachers care about the security of students’ personal data & 3.65 & 4.00 & 1.14 \\  & (in the context of e-learning) & 3.37 & 3.00 & 1.14 \\ \hline Q11 & Academic teachers respond quickly to e-mails & 3.37 & 3.00 & 1.14 \\ \hline Q12 & Academic teachers conduct e-learning in a strictly determined time & 4.15 & 4.00 & 1.01 \\ \hline Q13 & Using the e-learning platform is convenient & 4.20 & 5.00 & 1.12 \\ \hline Q14 & Logging in to the e-learning platform is easy & 4.38 & 5.00 & 0.96 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Source: Author’s own research.  
\end{table} 
Table 2: Quality of e-learning in the surveyed universities. The high evaluation of variables related to the e-learning platform allows us to conclude that universities cope well with the technical side of e-learning solutions. The solutions they implemented (it was usually the Moodle platform in various versions) work well and are well appreciated by students. At this point, it is worth paying attention to the median values--although the average for the examined variables was in the \"good\" range, the median is \"very good\". In the case of variables related to the evaluation of the quality of the functioning of the e-learning platform, the rating was very good most of the time, which shows a very high evaluation of this aspect of the functioning of the e-learning in the universities surveyed. In analyzing the histogram for the variable concerning the convenience of logging into the e-learning platform, 372 respondents (over 50% of all respondents) rated it at level 5--the highest rating. This proves that most students have no problem logging into the e-learning platform. Here, 13 respondents assessed the variable at level 1, and 21 respondents at level 2. In the next part of the publication, the relationships between individual variables and self-assessment by the respondents of information technologies are examined.