by abundant sunlight and frequent fires, and their status of conservation is NT (\"Near Threatened\"). The plant is a vulnerable species entered into the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Red List of Threatened Species [7]. Carnivorous plants have become an important ornamental component of botanical garden collections. They are highly valued as ornamental plants, and the constant appearance of new varieties proves the demand of the market [8]. _S. purpurea_ and _S. flawa_ have been the most studied in terms of metabolite profile and medical usefulness [9] because they were traditionally used by many aboriginal communities as medicinal plants against a wide spectrum of diseases, including tuberculosis. These facts as well as the low propagation rate of _Sarracenia_ spp. in their natural environment are the reason for treating these plants as an alternative source of propagation--in vitro reproduction. Since, additionally, many of these plants are endangered, the development of micropropagation techniques is a very good alternative to the acquisition of secondary metabolites. In vitro cultures also provide a possibility of deriving lines from individual seedlings, which is important for stabilizing the biological material, taking into account high pollination and the ease of creating hybrids. The derivation of clones from individual seeds is crucial for the selection of compensated biological material, which may be a valuable source of secondary metabolites and new varieties. The knowledge of how to obtain microcuttings is limited [10] as micropropagation is carried out mainly in private companies. Nowadays, the great interest of scientists is raised by the role of plants secondary metabolites acting as attractants and the plants usefulness in medicine, especially regarding the bioavailability of secondary metabolites [11; 12]. Various compounds in _Sarracenia_ have been reported, including volatiles, flavonoids, phytochemicals and pitcher fluid composition; however, their chemical compounds are relatively poorly described in terms of particular constituents. Volatiles for instance were identified in order to recognize the similarities among different species of the _Sarraceniaceae_ phylogeny [13]. Additionally, simultaneously with compound identification, the possibilities of determining and improving bioavailability of bioactive plants constituents, should be considered. Recent reports [14] focus on the relationship between compound bioavailability and compounds chemical structure, plant matrix and possible interactions which those provokes. Nevertheless, the possibilities to enhance the bioavailability of compounds such as flavonoids are possible in various models, which may include connecting flavonoid administration with mixtures (e.g., borneol/methanol) which improves compounds solubility or, on the other site, stabilizing the flavonoids structure by capping their hydroxyl groups with methyl groups [15]. The evaluation of the efficiency of these improvements is done by in vitro and in vivo models. Regarding in vitro methods, mainly, a gastrointestinal model, and the Caco-2 models are considered, while in the case of in vivo, mostly rodent models are used [16]. Other studies were conducted to define the role of chemicals as attractants for insects. In the natural environment, differences may occur in the plants' effectiveness to trap insects depending on their classification to a taxonomic group. [PERSON] et al. [17] found that pitchers captured a lower proportion of flying insects when traps were closer to the ground and that plants with a larger trap width could naturally catch larger insects. A vast majority of insect visitors are known to be potential prey for _Sarracenia_ plants. The visitors come from various systematic groups (ants, flies, grasshoppers, bees, wasps, moths, beetles and leafhoppers; there are also spiders among them). It is believed, however, that not only the design of the trap determines the effectiveness of the trapping.