## 2 Literature  
The quantity of publications about space mission risk, sustainability, and supply chain is quite minimal, but it is abundantly clear that there is a tremendous demand for exploring and presenting this topic as research publications. However, there have been no articles on multi-objective optimization models for space missions that take into account risk, sustainability, and supply chain. A risk identification, assessment, mitigation, and continuous management method is used throughout the design of a space mission. Anything that can go wrong, as well as the likelihood and repercussions of that happening, is defined as risk. The indicators, causes, and repercussions of these hazards extend across multiple levels of people and processes involved in the design, as well as the actual design outcome itself [5]. A text mining-based strategy for improving space mission risk classification is offered. Every of the potential risk factors indicated is assigned a weight, and an overall class score for space missions is computed. The proposed method assists the designated panel of experts who are normally entrusted with assigning weights to the parameters. It enables the examination of parameters of varying relevance, as much as an amount of magnitude. The NASA Mars Perseverance expedition is used to prove the practical use of the categorization algorithm [6]. Making risk judgments is inevitably subjective, however, it ought to be founded based on objective evaluation. However, qualitative risk evaluation methodologies popular for subjective judgments are easily introduced into investigations in the aerospace industry. This method provides a quantitative risk assessment methodology that enables mission risk evaluations to be considered and compared by decision-makers [7]. The risk assessment approach described in the European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS) safety risk assessment standard specifies how the standard is applied: its role in space programs, how it is made applicable, how it is to be used, and so on. The linkages to other ECSS standards, as well as the disciplines of safety and risk management, are also explained. While originally intended for space systems, safety, and risk analysts are encouraged to consider using the outlined approach for safety risk assessment in non-space applications [8]. Amounts of human-made objects in orbit are increasing, creating an imminent danger of cosmic sustainability. As a response, space agencies have developed a set of mitigation guidelines that allow space users to prevent the generation of space debris by, for example, limiting the orbital lifetime associated with their spaceship and rocket stages once their mission is over. Vast satellite constellations in low Earth orbit (LEO) may undermine the sustainability of the space environment enabled by these mitigation methods, despite addressing a shortage of basic internet service in some world locations. The response of the space item population to the creation of a large formation that adheres to a post-mission destruction protocol with different levels of accomplishment and disposal orbit options. [9]. Long-term science missions are envisaged in future space exploration visions, necessitating the necessity of supporting long-term expeditions. Resilience is an important characteristic of systems with sustainability that can be managed via autonomicity (enabling autonomic communications in a network), a growing paradigm for the independence of future computer-based systems motivated by mankind's nervous system's autonomy. Some investigations examine current research attempts to accomplish these targets of survivable systems as a whole with a focus on breakthroughs in the technology of Autonomic Policies [10]. Continuous trips to LEO, the Moon, and possibly Mars are expected in the upcoming phases of human spaceflight. The mission is vast in scope, including everything from scientific research to commercial exploitation.