## 5 Conclusions
[CrossRef]
* (75) [PERSON] Statistical rigor and practical utility in thematic map accuracy assessment. _Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens._**2001**, _67_, 727-734. * (76) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] A comparison of machine learning techniques to extract human set-tlements from high resolution imagery. In Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Valencia, Spain, 22-27 July 2018. * (77) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Auxiliary datasets improve accuracy of object-based land use/land cover classification in heterogeneous savanna landscapes. _Remote Sens. Environ._**2019**, _233_, 111354. [CrossRef]
* (78) [PERSON] Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. _Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens._**2004**, _70_, 627-633. [CrossRef]
* (79) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Remote sensing and geographic information system data integration: Error sources and research issues. _Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens._**1991**, _57_, 677-687. * (80) [PERSON]; [PERSON] A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines. _IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens._**2004**, _42_, 1335-1343. [CrossRef]
* (81) [PERSON] Explaining the unsuitability of the kappa coefficient in the assessment and comparison of the accuracy of thematic maps obtained by image classification. _Remote Sens. Environ._**2020**, _239_, 111630. [CrossRef]
* (82) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. _Remote Sens. Environ._**2014**, _148_, 42-57. [CrossRef]
* (83) Mapbiomas Brasil. Available online: [[https://mapbiomas.org/en](https://mapbiomas.org/en)]([https://mapbiomas.org/en](https://mapbiomas.org/en)) (accessed on 29 April 2022). * (84) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] TerraBrasilis: A Spatial Data Analytics Infrastructure for Large-Scale Thematic Mapping. _ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf._**2019**, \(8\), 513. [CrossRef]
* (85) PRODES--Coordenacao-Geral de Observacao da Terra. Available online: [[http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programmas/amazonia/prodes](http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programmas/amazonia/prodes)]([http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programmas/amazonia/prodes](http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programmas/amazonia/prodes)) (accessed on 29 April 2022). * (86) European Space Agency WorldCover. Available online: [[https://esa-worldcover.org/en](https://esa-worldcover.org/en)]([https://esa-worldcover.org/en](https://esa-worldcover.org/en)) (accessed on 27 May 2022). * (87) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Global land use/land cover with Sentinel 2 and deep learning. In Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Brussels, Belgium, 11-16 July 2021; Volume 2021. * (88) [PERSON] 5 Things to Consider about Google Earth Engine. Available online: [[https://www.matedev.com/posts/](https://www.matedev.com/posts/)]([https://www.matedev.com/posts/](https://www.matedev.com/posts/)) disadvantages-earth-engine.html (accessed on 29 April 2022). * [PERSON] and [PERSON] (2018) [PERSON]; [PERSON] _Multisensor Data Fusion and Machine Learning for Environmental Remote Sensing_; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. * [PERSON] and [PERSON] (2018) [PERSON]; [PERSON] Comparison of Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel-2 Imagery. _Sensors_**2018**, _18_, 18. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] et al. (2021) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Testing accuracy of land cover classification algorithms in the qilian mountains based on geo cloud platform. _Remote Sens._**2021**, _13_, 5064. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] et al.