## 6 Discussion
Meanwhile, integrated analysis of numerous geological-geophysical data allowed us to conclude that the main EEM structures are associated not with the mentioned folding but with the Neotethys Ocean's collision. South of the Alpine orogenic belt, within the Arabian and Sinai lithospheric plates, the Mesozoic terrane belt (MTB) was identified (Figure 25), e.g., [23]. An allochthonous oceanic crust occupies the westernmost part of the mentioned belt. We propose that the collision processes' features include the influence of a deep giant structure rotating counterclockwise [14]. This rotation indicates that theMTB's most critical element movement occurred from the northeast to the southwest of the EM. These structural-geodynamic data (in addition to several significant geological-geophysical features) are also confirmed by paleobiogeographic data showing that the allochthonous Jurassic fauna of the Ethiopian province is widely developed in EMM [23]. An important role was the discovery of an ancient block of oceanic crust in the western part of the MTB, corresponding to the reversely magnetized Kiama zone of the Early Permian age (Figures 12-15 and 17). This block was evidently moved along transform faults from the Neotethys region, roughly relating to the current location of Eastern Arabia. The movement of MTB terranes contributed, for instance, to the formation of Mt. Carmel ophiolites (northern Israel) [57]. In the absorption zone of the EM autochthonous oceanic crust, the Saharonim, Hameishar, and Karkom ophiolites (in/near the Makhtesh Ramon area, southern Israel) arose [23]. Thus, we can conclude that the multi-parametric geophysical-geological assessment (3D magnetic-gravity modeling, paleomagnetic, paleobiogeographic, petrological, and tectonic-structural analyses) unambiguously indicates the allochthonous nature of the MTB and the EM oceanic crust, which moved over more than 1000 km from the northeast. The detection of the Earth's crust's narrow block of reverse magnetization in the Lower Galilea, near Lake Kinneret (Figure 16), according to the recent mineralogical-petrological data [56; 58], may correspond to the initial spreading of the Neotethys Ocean (253-283 Ma). Based on the research conducted, we can conclude the following main items. Our integrated analysis, based on the plate tectonic concept, testifies that the dominance of the geodynamics of the region in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic was carried out not from the western (Atlantic) but from the eastern (Neothetical) direction. Applying paleomagnetic data with further mapping made it possible to evaluate the previously identified structures of various ranks from the standpoint of statics and geodynamics. This approach is novel due to the optimal combination of various applied geological-geophysical methods. In this study, for the first time, the paleomagnetic maps were accompanied by the corresponding scales that make these maps more understandable (Figure 19B, Figure 21B, and Figure 22B). Areas of development of the Kinneret (Figure 19A) and Hula (Figure 20) pull-apart basins have been identified, experiencing not only differentiation under the left DST shift conditions but also the formation of the faults and ring structures rotating counterclockwise in the adjacent zones. This phenomenon, previously established in [69; 76], was explained by the extended integrated geophysical studies in the region using 3D modeling and structural-geodynamic analysis [14]. The staging of the development of the Negev and Antilebanon terranes (see Figure 1) was substantiated by the example of the Hermon (Figure 21) and Makhtesh Ramon (Figure 23) areas, respectively, at the phases of their existence in the conditions of the oceanic margin in the pre-collisional phase of development, and in the further stages--the collisional development and the post-collision movements. These data indicate that both mentioned terranes and MTB moved in the Mesozoic from the east to the west in a counterclockwise direction.