## 5 Discussion
### What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Existing Studies?
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Study** & **Pros** & **Cons** \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [80] & Efforts in delivering awareness to society for the development of databases about associated security failures. & The developed methodology is still preliminary. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [81] & The accuracy of the developed model is reasonably well in comparing existing approaches. & The developed model is still preliminary. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [82] & An efficient mitigation measures for real-time analysis of risks in the nuclear sector. & The proposed research affects BN accuracy. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [83] & Results verified for combined attacks with mutual and non-trivial influences. & Limited to only one case study. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [84] & This research is helpful in documenting the expert knowledge. & Real-time traffic monitoring control has not been performed. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [85] & Applicability in emergency cases with high accuracy. & Specific for the case study. Challenging implementing in other fields. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [86] & Having low-SNR and better availability. & The results are only preliminary. Testing on the different scenarios is needed. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [87] & A security assessment is verified using a use case study. & The results are only preliminary. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [88] & BN implementation improves the Sargos system with is inherent abilities. & A specific approach is developed for the maritime industry; a lot of modifications are needed for use in other sectors. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [89] & A dynamic and optimal risk assessment for the software industry. & The simulation results still need to be modified. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [90] & Increases accuracy for risk assessment in the maritime industry. & Lacks in empirical data for circumstantial results. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [91] & Offers support mobility, protection, and concurrency for software verification. & Threat actors are not specified. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [92] & Offer recommendations for the designing and implementing of the energy sector to decrease the potential risks. & Specific use cases are hard to emulate outside of the sector or system. \\ \hline [PERSON] [93] & Presented reliable dataset for research purposes in the railway sector. & Lack of practicality in railways. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [94] & More robust solution for the water traffic system. & The human factor is not considered in real-time monitoring and is lacking for managing adequate personnel. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [95] & Applicable for both known and unknown vulnerabilities. & Limited applicability domains. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [96] & This study assists in identifying fundamental factors that may pose cybersecurity hazards. & The simulation results still need to be modified. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [97] & Reduces communication redundancies and enables data uniformity inspection in transportation. & Limited usability. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [98] & Improved accuracy and effective use of train control system. & Merely a preliminary analysis for the high-speed railway. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [99] & Feasibility and compatibility for protecting air transportation. & The results are only preliminary. \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [100] & Systematic evaluation of the anticipated faults in the system. & There is not sufficient data of safety-critical software, assembled for real-time systems. \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: _Cont._