### Literature Review Comparison
Section 2 presents the system model of our proposed schemes, and Section 3 presents the proposed transmission scenarios, while Section 4 shows the results of the proposed scheme in addition to their discussions. Finally, we present the conclusions in Section 5. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt}} \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**S/No.**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Related Works**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Relaying**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Unturated**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**No. of Relays**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Sensitive Transmission**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Time-Division**} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(Y_{(IC)_{1}}\)**s**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Jamming Node**} \\  & & & & **key (\(E\))** & & & & & **(\(ICST\))** & **(\(MCUTDT\))** \\ \hline
1 & [PERSON] et al. 2009 [28] & ✓ & \(E\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & � & � \\ \hline
2 & [PERSON] et al. 2010 [30] & ✓ & \(E\) & \(M\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & � \\ \hline
3 & [PERSON] et al. 2010 [35] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & \(N/A\) & � \\ \hline
4 & [PERSON] et al. 2011 [43] & ✓ & \(E\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & \(N/A\) & � \\ \hline
5 & [PERSON] et al. 2014 [46] & � & \(E\) & \(\mathcal{K}\) & ✓ & ✓ & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
6 & [PERSON] et al. 2012 [40] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(D\) \\ \hline
7 & [PERSON] et al. 2012 [47] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
8 & [PERSON] et al. 2012 [34] & � & \(E\) & � & � & � & � & � & � & \(N/A\) \\ \hline
9 & [PERSON] et al. 2013 [34] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(M\) & � & � & � & � & \(N/A\) & � \\ \hline
10 & [PERSON] et al. 2013 [29] & ✓ & \(E\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & \(N/A\) & � \\ \hline
11 & [PERSON] et al. 2013 [48] & ✓ & \(E\) & \(S\) & ✓ & ✓ & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
12 & [PERSON] et al. 2014 [50] & ✓ & \(SUd\) acts as \(UR\) & \(S\) & ✓ & � & � & \(N/A\) & � \\ \hline
13 & [PERSON] et al. 2015 [45] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & ✓ & \(D\) \\ \hline
14 & [PERSON] et al. 2016 [49] & ✓ & \(E\) & \(S\) & ✓ & ✓ & ✓ & \(\mathcal{(SC)}ST\) & � & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
15 & [PERSON] et al. 2016 [51] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & ✓ & ✓ & ✓ & \(\mathcal{(SC)}ST\) & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
16 & [PERSON] et al. 2017 [33] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
17 & [PERSON] et al. 2018 [11] & � & \(E\) & � & � & � & � & � & � & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
18 & [PERSON] et al. 2018 [12] & � & \(E\) & � & � & � & � & � & � & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
19 & [PERSON] et al. 2018 [57] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(M\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
20 & [PERSON] et al. 2018 [38] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
21 & [PERSON] et al. 2018 [98] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(D\) \\ \hline
22 & [PERSON] et al. 2018 [49] & � & \(E\) & � & � & � & � & � & \(N/A\) & \(S\) \\ \hline
23 & [PERSON] et al. 2020 [36] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(D\) \\ \hline
24 & [PERSON] et al. 2021 [53] & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
25 & [PERSON] et al. 2023 [54] & ✓ & \(E\) & \(S\) & � & � & � & � & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline
26 & Our proposed scheme & ✓ & \(UR\) & \(S\) & ✓ & ✓ & ✓ & ✓ & ✓ & \(CJ\) \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Literature review comparison table (Here ✓ and � refers to consideration and non-consideration of the scenario in the proposed work respectively).