# Research on the Influence of Anxiety Psychology on Unsafe Behavior Among Construction Workers
## 4 Model Validation and Result Analysis
### Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **S.E** & **C.R** & \(\boldsymbol{p}\) & **Normalized Path Efficient** \\ \hline Organizational climate \(\rightarrow\) O1 & 0.098 & 8.451 & *** & 0.811 \\ Organizational climate \(\rightarrow\) O2 & 0.093 & 8.484 & *** & 0.743 \\ Organizational climate \(\rightarrow\) O3 & 0.091 & 7.981 & *** & 0.783 \\ Security capability \(\rightarrow\) C1 & 0.083 & 7.684 & *** & 0.714 \\ Security capability \(\rightarrow\) C2 & 0.078 & 7.757 & *** & 0.818 \\ Security capability \(\rightarrow\) C3 & 0.074 & 9.013 & *** & 0.732 \\ Job satisfaction \(\rightarrow\) S1 & 0.071 & 9.145 & *** & 0.779 \\ Job satisfaction \(\rightarrow\) S2 & 0.066 & 9.367 & *** & 0.755 \\ Job satisfaction \(\rightarrow\) S3 & 0.062 & 9.313 & *** & 0.782 \\ Job satisfaction \(\rightarrow\) S4 & 0.052 & 9.011 & *** & 0.778 \\ Job satisfaction \(\rightarrow\) S5 & 0.051 & 9.112 & *** & 0.821 \\ Anxiety psychology \(\rightarrow\) A1 & 0.058 & 9.142 & *** & 0.771 \\ Anxiety psychology \(\rightarrow\) A2 & 0.042 & 8.883 & *** & 0.742 \\ Anxiety psychology \(\rightarrow\) A3 & 0.039 & 8.734 & *** & 0.821 \\ Unsafe behaviors \(\rightarrow\) B1 & 0.045 & 8.678 & *** & 0.777 \\ Unsafe behaviors \(\rightarrow\) B2 & 0.041 & 8.618 & *** & 0.735 \\ Unsafe behaviors \(\rightarrow\) B3 & 0.038 & 7.457 & *** & 0.803 \\ Unsafe behaviors \(\rightarrow\) B4 & 0.037 & 7.562 & *** & 0.796 \\ Unsafe behaviors \(\rightarrow\) B5 & 0.036 & 8.542 & *** & 0.838 \\ Unsafe behaviors \(\rightarrow\) B6 & 0.049 & 8.533 & *** & 0.757 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Significance level is \(p<0.001\).  
\end{table} 
Table 11: Fitting of initial data. The hypothesis validation results for the relationship between anxiety psychology and unsafe behaviors are as follows:  
H1: Anxiety psychology \(\rightarrow\) Unsafe behaviors (standardized coefficient = 0.336, S.E. = 0.065, C.R. = 3.286, \(p\) < 0.001)  
The path achieved statistical significance (\(p\) < 0.001), confirming Hypothesis H1. The hypothesis validation results for the mediating variables (organizational climate, safety competency, job satisfaction) in relation to anxiety psychology are as follows:  
H3: Organizational climate \(\rightarrow\) Anxiety psychology (standardized coefficient = \(-\)0.358, S.E. = 0.063, C.R. = \(-\)4.423, \(p\) < 0.001)  
H6: Safety competency \(\rightarrow\) Anxiety psychology (standardized coefficient = \(-\)0.142, S.E. = 0.071, C.R. = \(-\)3.270, \(p\) < 0.001)  
H9: Job satisfaction \(\rightarrow\) Anxiety psychology (standardized coefficient = \(-\)0.279, S.E. = 0.068, C.R. = \(-\)4.713, \(p\) < 0.05)  
All paths were statistically significant (\(p\) < 0.05), validating Hypotheses H3, H6, and H9, with organizational climate and job satisfaction exerting pronounced effects. The hypothesis validation results for the mediating variables (organizational climate, safety competency, job satisfaction) in relation to unsafe behaviors are as follows:  
H2: Organizational climate \(\rightarrow\) Unsafe behaviors (standardized coefficient = \(-\)0.216, S.E. = 0.061, C.R. = \(-\)3.161, \(p\) < 0.01)  
H5: Safety competency \(\rightarrow\) Unsafe behaviors (standardized coefficient = \(-\)0.197, S.E. = 0.071, C.R. = \(-\)3.586, \(p\) < 0.001)  
H8: Job satisfaction \(\rightarrow\) Unsafe behaviors (standardized coefficient = \(-\)0.178, S.E. = 0.079, C.R. = \(-\)3.178, \(p\) < 0.05)  
All paths were statistically significant (\(p\) < 0.05), validating Hypotheses H2, H5, and H8. Organizational climate demonstrated the strongest negative impact on unsafe behaviors.