## 3 Results and Discussion
### Analysis of CIM's Potential for the Calculation of the Indicators
#### 3.2.48 The Indicator to Measure Environmental Management  
This indicator promotes integrated environmental management from a Smart City perspective. It is developed by SBTool\({}^{\text{PT}}\) Urban, SNTool, and BREEAM C, and addressed by ISO 37120 and the SDGs, making it a key concern of sustainability. As with the previous indicator, this one is calculated using a verification list in the \(\text{SBTool}^{\text{PT}}\) Urban Guide. The model cannot be used to add and assess the criteria of the list.  
CIM has been found to be a viable method of calculating sustainability indicators and their parameters. In the case of this study, these calculations are based on the \(\text{SBTool}^{\text{PT}}\) Urban methodology. The analysis of sustainability indicators from \(\text{SBTool}^{\text{PT}}\) Urban, SNTool, BRECAM-C, and LEED ND has identified 48 indicators as priorities, of which 41 are presented in the \(\text{SBTool}^{\text{PT}}\) Urban methodology. These 41 indicators, presented by \(\text{SBTool}^{\text{PT}}\) Urban, have 52 calculation parameters, at least one parameter per indicator.  
Evaluating how many indicators and their parameters can be calculated using CIM revealed that 28 parameters can be determined by a CIM model. In addition, seven can be partially calculated through CIM. The CIM model could not determine 17 parameters, and seven parameters were classified as \"NON-APPLICABLE\" since \(\text{SBTool}^{\text{PT}}\) Urban does not provide them. However, further research in this field may be able to assist in improving the calculations, and it is possible that additional parameters may be determined by the CIM. Table 1 summarizes the classification of indicators according to their possibility of assessment using CIM.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Prioritized Indicator**} & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **SBTool\({}^{\text{PT}}\) U** \\ **Indicator** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} **Number of** \\ **Parameters** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{3}{c}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Number of Parameters That Can Be** \\ **Assessed by CIM** \\ \end{tabular} } \\ \cline{3-6}  & & & **Yes** & **No** & **Partially** \\ \hline Passive solar planning & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Ventilation Potential & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Urban Network & YES & 2 & 2 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Use Natural Potential of Land & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Uses Density and Flexibility & YES & 2 & 2 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Reuse of Urban Land & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Building reuse & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Technical infrastructure & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Conservation of land * & NO & N/A & N/A & N/A & N/A \\ \hline Distribution of green spaces & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Connectivity of green spaces & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Native vegetation & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Environmental monitoring & YES & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ Construction activity pollution prevention * & NO & N/A & N/A & N/A & N/A \\ \hline Energy Efficiency & YES & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline Renewable energies & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline Centralized energy management & YES & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ District heating and cooling * & NO & N/A & N/A & N/A & N/A \\ \hline Efficient water consumption & YES & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline Effluent management & YES & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline Centralized management & YES & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline Low impact materials & YES & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ Energy embodied in construction materials * & NO & N/A & N/A & N/A & N/A \\ \hline Construction and Demolition Waste & YES & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline Solid waste management & YES & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline Air quality & YES & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: Classification of indicators.