## 3 Results
### Chemical Analysis
Figure 6 indicates the MIC values for _Hypericum perforatum_ L are extracted against the bacterial strains, according to the data. With mean MIC values of 0.14 and 0.16, the _Hypericum perforatum_ L. extract from Figure 6 appears to be the most effective against _Microococcus luteus_ and _Listeria innocua_. It also works moderately against _Proteus mirabilis_, _P.fragii_, and _P. fluorescens_. With mean MIC values ranging from 0.85 to 1.12, it is less effective against _Escherichia coli_ and _Salmonella enteritidis_. The highest MIC value was observed for _E. coli_, with a value of 1.6, while the lowest MIC value was observed for _M. luteus_, with a value of 0.05. Hypericum perforatum L has the lowest MIC values compared to _Armoracia rusticana_, _Plantago major L_., _Rumex acetosa_ L., and _Urtica dioica_ L. for _Listeria innocua_. Based on Figure 6, the _Plantago major_ L. extract performed well against bacterial strains. The table displays each bacteria strain's mean according to the data. The mean MIC value of the _Plantago major_ works against _Proteus mirabilis_, _Listeria innocua_, _Pseudomonas fluorescens_, and _Pseudomonas fragii_. In contrast, the highest MIC value was observed for _Escherichia coli_, with a value of 1.6, while the lowest MIC value was observed for _Microoccus luteus_. _Plantago major_ L. has a lower MIC value for _Escherichia coli_ and _Proteus mirabilis_ when compared to _Armoracia rusticana_ but a higher MIC value for the other five strains. In Figure 6, it appears that we have been examining _Rumex acetosa_ L. extract when performed against seven strains. The _Rumex acetosa_ L. extract from Figure 6 appears to be the most effective against _Microoccus luteus_. It is also the only one that works effectively against all strains, with mean values ranging from 0.11 to 0.32. The maximum MIC value was observed for _Escherichia coli_, with a value of 0.43, while the minimum MIC value was observed for _Microoccus luteus_, based on the data from Figure 6. _Rumex acetosa_ L. has the strongest inhibitor effect against all microorganisms compared to _Armoracia rusticana_, _Hypericum perforatum_ L., _Plantago major_ L., and _Urtica dioica_ L.  
Figure 6 above indicates the impact of _Urtica dioica_ L. extract and displays a mean MIC moderately effective against _Listeria innocua_ (mean MIC = 0.29) but is marginally effective against the other strains, including _Escherichia coli_. With a mean MIC of 0.55, it is  
Figure 6: Correlation Matrix conducted on 23 compounds across all samples (RStudio Version: 4.2.2). less effective against _Salmonella enteritidis_ and _Urtica dioica_ L. but more effective against all strains when compared to _Armoracia rusciana_, _P. major_ L., and _Hypericum performu_ L. The maximum MIC value was observed for _Salmonella enteritidis_, with a value of 0.6%, while the lowest MIC value was observed for _Microoccus luteus_, with a value of 0.1%. Figure 7 shows the average mean values across all extract samples against the seven strains of bacteria. Looking at Figure 7, it appears that _Rumex acetosa_ L. has the lowest mean MIC value for all bacterial strains. Generally, _Urtica dioica_ L. has the lower mean MIC value for _Listeria innocua_ (0.29) and _Escherichia coli_ (0.52; when compared to _P. major_ L., _Armoracia rusciana_ has the highest mean MIC value for _Salmonella enteritidis_ (1.12), while _Planta major_ L. has the highest mean MIC value for _Proteus mirabilis_ (0.85). _Listeria innocua_ has a low sensitivity to _Armoracia rusciana_ at 0.59%. _Rumex acetose_ L. has the highest inhibitor growth effect against _Salmonella enteritidis_ at 0.31%, according to the data displayed in Figure 7. It is important to note that the mean MIC values for each plant vary depending on the bacteria strain, suggesting that each plant may have specific antimicrobial properties against certain bacteria.