## 3 Results
Significant partial influence was evidenced for walking (negative partial influence), running (positive partial influence) and high-speed running (negative partial influence) in the AP, as well as for walking and running in the DP (both positive partial influence) (Table 5). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Match Outcome**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**ANOVA**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & **Loss** & **Draw** & **Win** & **F test** & \(p\) & \(\eta^{2}\) \\ \hline Total distance in AP & 4482 \(\pm\) 1162 D,W & 3827 \(\pm\) 941 L & 3787 \(\pm\) 916 L & 11.87 & 0.01 & 0.09 \\ Walking in AP & 1000 \(\pm\) 325 D,W & 747 \(\pm\) 257 L & 750 \(\pm\) 231 L & 22.5 & 0.01 & 0.16 \\ Jogging in AP & 2085 \(\pm\) 682 D,W & 1733 \(\pm\) 527 L & 1758 \(\pm\) 543 L & 9.16 & 0.01 & 0.07 \\ Running in AP & 949 \(\pm\) 386 & 885 \(\pm\) 317 & 864 \(\pm\) 286 & 1.35 & 0.26 & 0.01 \\ High speed running in AP & 387 \(\pm\) 120 & 393 \(\pm\) 127 & 362 \(\pm\) 98 & 1.49 & 0.23 & 0.01 \\ \multicolumn{7}{c}{Sprinting in AP} & 61 \(\pm\) 55 & 68 \(\pm\) 45 & 53 \(\pm\) 41 & 2.08 & 0.13 & 0.02 \\ High intensity running in AP & 448 \(\pm\) 138 & 461 \(\pm\) 147 & 415 \(\pm\) 114 & 2.37 & 0.10 & 0.02 \\ Total distance in DP & 3181 \(\pm\) 759 D,W & 3729 \(\pm\) 873 L & 3948 \(\pm\) 1083 L & 14.63 & 0.01 & 0.11 \\ Walking in DP & 865 \(\pm\) 312 W & 972 \(\pm\) 305 & 1084 \(\pm\) 392 L & 7.92 & 0.01 & 0.06 \\ Jogging in DP & 1431 \(\pm\) 409 D,W & 1687 \(\pm\) 446 L & 1813 \(\pm\) 556 L & 13.09 & 0.01 & 0.10 \\ Running in DP & 610 \(\pm\) 195 D,W & 728 \(\pm\) 259 L & 742 \(\pm\) 264 L & 7.15 & 0.01 & 0.06 \\ High speed running in DP & 231 \(\pm\) 134 & 282 \(\pm\) 174 & 256 \(\pm\) 164 & 2.27 & 0.11 & 0.02 \\ \multicolumn{7}{c}{Sprinting in DP} & 44 \(\pm\) 51 & 60 \(\pm\) 68 & 53 \(\pm\) 65 & 1.51 & 0.22 & 0.01 \\ High intensity running in DP & 275 \(\pm\) 169 & 342 \(\pm\) 226 & 309 \(\pm\) 207 & 2.41 & 0.09 & 0.02 \\ \hline \end{tabular} Legend: W = presents significant post-hoc differences from won matches; D = presents significant post-hoc differences from drew matches; L = presents significant post-hoc differences from lost matches.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: Descriptive statistics and differences in running performances according to the match outcome (data are given as Mean \(\pm\) SD). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline  & **FB** & **CD** & **CM** & **FW** & **WM** \\ \hline Total distance in AP & \(-0.44\) * & \(-0.46\) * & \(-0.41\) * & \(-0.18\) & \(-0.65\) * \\ Walking in AP & \(-0.52\) * & \(-0.42\) * & \(-0.44\) * & \(-0.52\) * & \(-0.41\) * \\ Jogging in AP & \(-0.39\) * & \(-0.47\) * & \(-0.38\) * & \(-0.08\) & \(-0.65\) * \\ Running in AP & \(-0.24\) & \(-0.17\) & \(-0.24\) & 0.03 & \(-0.61\) * \\ High speed running in AP & \(-0.26\) * & 0.06 & \(-0.18\) & 0.00 & \(-0.46\) * \\ Sprinting in AP & \(0.28\) * & 0.13 & 0.11 & 0.01 & \(-0.16\) \\ High intensity running in AP & \(-0.08\) & 0.10 & \(-0.11\) & 0.00 & \(-0.46\) * \\ Total distance in DP & \(0.54\) * & 0.41 * & 0.49 * & 0.53 * & 0.67 * \\ Walking in DP & \(0.50\) * & 0.47 * & 0.43 * & 0.55 * & 0.73 * \\ Jogging in DP & \(0.54\) * & 0.30 * & 0.41 * & 0.42 & 0.51 * \\ Running in DP & \(0.36\) * & 0.21 & 0.44 * & 0.48 & 0.21 \\ High speed running in DP & \(0.27\) * & 0.16 & 0.15 & \(-0.21\) & 0.20 \\ Sprinting in DP & \(0.01\) & 0.15 & 0.13 & \(-0.21\) & 0.33 \\ High intensity running in DP & \(0.22\) & 0.16 & 0.16 & \(-0.24\) & 0.28 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Correlations between RP in AP and DP of game and total points earned at the end of group stage of UCL.