## 5 Results
### Condyle-Fossa Relationships  
The analysis of the condyle position in relation to the glenoid fossa revealed significant differences between sexes and skeletal classes:  
Male Patients: In Class II hypodivergent males, the condyle was positioned more posteriorly in the fossa, while in hyperdivergent males, it was slightly anterior. In Class I patients, the condyle was almost concentric [Table 3]. ### Condyle-Fossa Relationships  
The analysis of the condyle position in relation to the glenoid fossa revealed significant differences between sexes and skeletal classes:  
Male Patients: In Class II hypodivergent males, the condyle was positioned more posteriorly in the fossa, while in hyperdivergent males, it was slightly anterior. In Class I patients, the condyle was almost concentric [Table 3]. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Female**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Class II**} & & \\ \hline Divergence & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mesodivergent} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyperdivergent} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hypodivergent} \\ \hline Side & Right side & Left side & Right side & Left side & Right side & Left side \\ \hline A-P & \(-11\%\) & \(-5.80\%\) & \(12.2\%\) & \(15\%\) & \(-20.8\%\) & \(-13.3\%\) \\ \hline S-I & 4 mm & 4.1 mm & 2.1 mm & 2.6 mm & 4.5 mm & 4.2 mm \\ \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Class I**} & & & & & \\ \hline Divergence & Mesodivergent & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyperdivergent} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hypodivergent} \\ \hline A-P & \(-1.58\%\) & \(-2.56\%\) & & \(-5.70\%\) & \(-3.70\%\) \\ \hline S-I & 3.6 mm & 3.05 mm & & 4 mm & 4.5 mm \\ \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Class III**} & & & & & \\ \hline Divergence & Mesodivergent & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyperdivergent} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hypodivergent} \\ \hline A-P & & \(12\%\) & \(17\%\) & \(13\%\) & \(14\%\) \\ \hline S-I & & \(1\) mm & \(1.2\) mm & \(4\) mm & \(4.25\) mm \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Condyle–fossa relationships in female patients. A-P (anterior–posterior); S-I (superior–inferior). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Male**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Class II**} & & \\ \hline Divergence & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mesodivergent} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyperdivergent} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hypodivergent} \\ \hline Side & Right side & Left side & Right side & Left side & Right side & Left side \\ \hline A-P & \(-12\%\) & \(-8.67\%\) & \(20.2\%\) & \(25.9\%\) & \(-12.5\%\) & \(-14.3\%\) \\ \hline S-I & 3.6 mm & 4.1 mm & 0.8 mm & 1 mm & 4.4 mm & 5 mm \\ \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Class I**} & & & & & \\ \hline Divergence & Mesodivergent & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyperdivergent} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hypodivergent} \\ \hline A-P & \(-1.58\%\) & \(-2.56\%\) & & \(-5.70\%\) & \(-3.70\%\) \\ \hline S-I & 3.6 mm & 3.05 mm & & 4 mm & 4.5 mm \\ \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Class III**} & & & & & \\ \hline Divergence & Mesodivergent & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hyperdivergent} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hypodivergent} \\ \hline A-P & & \(17\%\) & \(15\%\) & \(20\%\) & \(15\%\) \\ \hline S-I & & \(1\) mm & \(1.2\) mm & \(4.1\) mm & \(4.4\) mm \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Condyle–fossa relationships in male patients. A-P (anterior–posterior); S-I (superior–inferior). Female Patients: In Class II hypodivergent females, the condyle was positioned posteriorly, while in hyperdivergent females [Table 2] the condyle was located more anteriorly and higher in the fossa [Table 2]. Tables 2 and 3 [Condyle-Fossa Relationships by Sex and Skeletal Class], highlights the anterior-posterior (A-P) and superior-inferior (S-I) condylar positioning for male and female patients with Class I, II, and III profiles [Figures 3 and 4]. This scheme helps to easily visualize the differences in cephalometric variables between the two groups, clearly illustrating how males and females differed in terms of angles and skeletal measurement.