## 3 Experimental Results
### Experimental Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline
**PARAMETER** & **MEANING** & **VALUE** \\ \hline \(N_{c}\) & Chromosomes & 500 \\ \hline \(N_{g}\) & Generations & 200 \\ \hline \(p_{s}\) & Crossover rate & 0.10 \\ \hline \(p_{m}\) & Mutation rate & 0.05 \\ \hline \(N_{T}\) & Number of chromosomes that selected randomly & 20 \\ \hline \(N_{I}\) & Number of iterations before local search & 10 \\ \hline \(F\) & Magnitude of changes from local search & 4.0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: The values of the parameters used in the experiments. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**DATASET** & **BFGS** & **GENETIC** & **NNC** & **INNC** \\ \hline APPENDICITIES & 18.00\% & 24.40\% & **13.70\%** & 14.70\% \\ \hline AUSTRALIAN & 38.13\% & 36.64\% & **14.51\%** & 14.80\% \\ \hline BALANCE & 8.64\% & **8.36\%** & 22.11\% & 8.66\% \\ \hline CIRULAR & 6.08\% & **5.13\%** & 13.64\% & 5.32\% \\ \hline CLEVELAND & 77.55\% & 57.21\% & 50.10\% & **47.93\%** \\ \hline DERMATOLOGY & 52.92\% & **16.60\%** & 25.06\% & 20.89\% \\ \hline ECOLI & 69.52\% & 54.67\% & **47.82\%** & 48.21\% \\ \hline FERT & 23.20\% & 28.50\% & **19.00\%** & 20.50\% \\ \hline HABERMAN & 29.34\% & 28.66\% & 28.03\% & **26.70\%** \\ \hline HAYES-ROTH & 37.33\% & 56.18\% & 35.93\% & **31.77\%** \\ \hline HEART & 39.44\% & 26.41\% & 15.78\% & **14.74\%** \\ \hline HEARTATTACK & 46.67\% & 29.03\% & **19.33\%** & 20.43\% \\ \hline HOUSEVOTES & 7.13\% & 7.00\% & 3.65\% & **3.26\%** \\ \hline IONOSPHERE & 15.29\% & 15.14\% & **11.12\%** & 11.92\% \\ \hline LIVERDISORDER & 42.59\% & 37.09\% & 33.71\% & **31.77\%** \\ \hline MAMMOGRAPHIC & 17.24\% & 19.88\% & 17.78\% & **15.81\%** \\ \hline PARKINSONS & 27.58\% & 16.58\% & **12.21\%** & 12.53\% \\ \hline PIMA & 35.59\% & 34.21\% & 27.99\% & **24.00\%** \\ \hline POPFAILURES & 5.24\% & **4.17\%** & 6.74\% & 6.44\% \\ \hline REGIONS2 & 36.28\% & 33.53\% & 25.52\% & **23.18\%** \\ \hline SAHEART & 37.48\% & 34.85\% & 30.52\% & **28.09\%** \\ \hline SEGMENT & 68.97\% & 46.30\% & 54.99\% & **43.12\%** \\ \hline SPIRAL & 47.99\% & 47.67\% & 48.39\% & **43.99\%** \\ \hline STUDENT & 7.14\% & 5.61\% & 5.78\% & **4.55\%** \\ \hline TRANSFUSION & 25.80\% & 25.84\% & 25.34\% & **23.43\%** \\ \hline WDBC & 29.91\% & 7.87\% & 6.95\% & **4.41\%** \\ \hline WINE & 59.71\% & 22.88\% & 14.35\% & **9.77\%** \\ \hline Z\_F\_S & 39.37\% & 24.60\% & 14.17\% & **8.53\%** \\ \hline Z\_O\_N\_F\_S & 65.67\% & 64.81\% & 49.18\% & **38.58\%** \\ \hline ZO\_NF\_S & 43.04\% & 21.54\% & 14.14\% & **6.84\%** \\ \hline ZFigure 4: Box plot for the comparison between the machine learning methods applied on the classification datasets. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**DATASET** & **BFGS** & **GENETIC** & **NNC** & **INNC** \\ \hline ABALONE & 5.69 & 7.17 & 5.05 & **4.33** \\ \hline AIRFOIL & 0.003 & 0.003 & 0.003 & **0.002** \\ \hline BASEBALL & 119.63 & 64.60 & 59.85 & **48.42** \\ \hline BK & 0.36 & 0.26 & 2.32 & **0.07** \\ \hline BL & 1.09 & 2.23 & 0.021 & **0.002** \\ \hline CONCRETE & 0.066 & 0.01 & 0.008 & **0.005** \\ \hline DEE & 2.36 & 1.01 & 0.26 & **0.23** \\ \hline HO & 0.62 & 0.37 & 0.017 & **0.01** \\ \hline HOUSING & 97.38 & 43.26 & 26.35 & **16.01** \\ \hline FY & 0.19 & 0.65 & 0.058 & **0.042** \\ \hline LASER & 0.015 & 0.59 & 0.024 & **0.005** \\ \hline LW & 2.98 & 0.54 & **0.011** & 0.012 \\ \hline MORTGAGE & 8.23 & 0.40 & 0.30 & **0.026** \\ \hline MUNDIAL & 6.48 & 1.22 & 4.47 & **0.034** \\ \hline PL & 0.29 & 0.28 & 0.045 & **0.022** \\ \hline QUAKE & 0.42 & 0.12 & 0.045 & **0.04** \\ \hline REALETATE & 128.94 & 81.19 & 76.78 & **70.99** \\ \hline SN & 3.89 & 0.40 & 0.026 & **0.023** \\ \hline TREASURY & 9.91 & 2.93 & 0.47 & **0.066** \\ \hline TZ & 3.27 & 5.38 & 5.04 & **0.03** \\ \hline VE & 1.92 & 2.43 & 6.61 & **0.025** \\ \hline
**AVERAGE** & **18.75** & **10.24** & **8.94** & **6.69** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Results from the conducted experiments on the regression datasets.