## 3 Results and Discussion
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Type of Neutralizing Substance**} \\ \cline{2-10} \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Fluorine Dose in**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Without**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Time**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Charcoal**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Loam**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Mean**} \\ \cline{2-10} \multicolumn{1}{c}{**mg kg\({}^{-1}\) of Soil**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Neutralizing Substance**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Time**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Charcoal**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Loam**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Mean**} \\ \hline \hline \multirow{4}{*}{0} & 3.6 & 3.8 & 4.4 & 3.9 & 3.9 & 3.9 \\  & 3.6 & 3.6 & 4.3 & 3.8 & 3.8 & 3.8 \\
200 & 3.5 & 3.4 & 4.3 & 3.6 & 3.7 \\
300 & 3.3 & 3.3 & 4.3 & 3.6 & 3.6 \\ Mean & 3.5 & 3.5 & 4.3 & 3.7 & - \\ \(r\) & \(-\)0.82 ** & \(-\)0.96 ** & \(-\)0.20 & \(-\)0.83 ** & - & - \\ \multicolumn{10}{c}{LSD for:} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{aerial parts a—0.09; b—0.09; a:b—n.s.} \\ \multicolumn{10}{c}{Winter oilseed rape} \\  & seed & seed & seed & seed & seed & seed \\
0 & 3.9 & 4.0 & 4.3 & 3.1 & 3.8 \\
100 & 3.5 & 3.9 & 4.2 & 3.1 & 3.7 \\
200 & 3.4 & 3.9 & 4.1 & 3.1 & 3.6 \\
300 & 3.3 & 3.7 & 4.1 & 3.0 & 3.5 \\ Mean & 3.5 & 3.9 & 4.2 & 3.1 & - \\ \(r\) & \(-\)0.90 ** & \(-\)0.82 ** & \(-\)0.44 & \(-\)0.47 & - \\ \multicolumn{10}{c}{LSD for:} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{aerial parts a—0.09; b—0.09; a:b—0.19} \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Sulphur content in yellow lupine, winter oilseed rape, and narrow-leaf lupine aerial parts in g 5 kg\({}^{-1}\) DM. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Type of Neutralizing Substance**} \\ \cline{2-10} \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Pluorine Dose in mg**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Without Neutralizing Substance**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**LIME**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Charcoal**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Loam**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Mean**} \\ \cline{2-10} \multicolumn{1}{c}{**kg\({}^{-1}\) of Soil**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Aerial Parts**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Roots**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Aerial Parts**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Roots**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Aerial Parts**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Roots**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Aerial Parts**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Roots**} \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{10}{c}{Black radish} \\
0 & 3.21 & 1.28 & 2.54 & 1.19 & 2.61 & 1.12 & 3.26 & 1.51 & 2.91 & 1.25 \\
100 & 2.87 & 1.26 & 2.40 & 1.12 & 2.61 & 1.09 & 2.88 & 1.37 & 2.69 & 1.21 \\
200 & 2.73 & 1.22 & 2.25 & 1.06 & 2.23 & 1.01 & 2.70 & 1.20 & 2.48 & 1.12 \\
300 & 2.69 & 1.16 & 1.93 & 1.00 & 1.98 & 0.98 & 2.63 & 1.10 & 2.31 & 1.06 \\ Mean & 2.87 & 1.23 & 2.28 & 1.09 & 2.36 & 1.05 & 2.87 & 1.30 & - & - \\ \(r\) & \(-\)0.90 & \(-\)0.88 ** & \(-\)0.97 ** & \(-\)0.97 ** & \(-\)0.97 ** & \(-\)0.81 & \(-\)0.93 ** & \(-\)0.98 & - & - \\ \multicolumn{10}{c}{LSD for:} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{aerial parts a—0.06; b—0.06; a:b—0.12; roots a—0.02; b—0.05} \\ \multicolumn{10}{c}{Phaecia} \\ \multicolumn{10}{c}{0} & 0 & 0.33 & 7.05 & 0.28 & 7.12 & 0.27 & 6.83 & 0.47 & 7.42 & 0.34 & 7.10 \\
100 & 0.33 & 6.23 & 0.28 & 6.23 & 0.27 & 5.94 & 0.54 & 5.94 & 0.35 & 6.08 \\
200 & 0.39 & 5.29 & 0.28 & 5.27 & 0.28 & 5.19 & 0.53 & 5.49 & 0.37 & 5.31 \\
300 & 0.42 & 5.22 & 0.32 & 5.27 & 0.24 & 4.45 & 0.38 & 4.79 & 0.34 & 5.93 \\ Mean & 0.37 & 5.95 & 0.29 & 5.57 & 0.26 &The data reported from this experiment (Tables 2-5) show that the increasingly high fluorine soil pollution had a significant effect on the content of sodium and sulphur in all organs of all plant species. This is verified by the two-factorial analysis of variance performed and the calculated coefficients of Pearson's simple correlation. Based on the statistical analysis of the research data, highly statistically significant relationships were demonstrated between the fluorine soil pollution and the sodium content in the test plants (Tables 2 and 3).