## 3 Results
According to these results, the environmental impacts of the endogenous exergy destruction rates of the ORC turbine (5.38E-07 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) and ORC pump (2.11E-07 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) were bigger than those of the exogenous exergy destruction rates. The environmental impacts of the exogenous exergy destruction rates of the ORC turbine (7.26E-08 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) and ORC pump (3.13E-08 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)), however, were bigger than those of the endogenous exergy destruction rates. This shows that the ORC recuperator environmental impacts can be improved by focusing on the component itself, while the environmental impacts of the ORC turbine and ORC pump depend on other components. The avoidable part of the environmental impact of the exergy destruction shows the improvable potential of the component or the system. The unavoidable part of the environmental impact of the exergy destruction rate shows the technological and economic limits of the improvement potential. The ORC turbine (5.41E-07 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) and ORC pump (2.15E-07 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) had bigger unavoidable environmental impacts of the exergy destruction rates, and the ORC turbine (6.94E-08 (pts.S-1)) had a bigger avoidable environmental impact of the exergy destruction rate, [PERSON] et al. [47], [PERSON] [48]. Table 18 indicates the results of the advanced exergo-environmental analysis for the SGPP cycle. According to these results, the environmental impacts of the endogenous exergy destruction rates of the steam turbine (3.04E-06 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) and steam evaporator (2.77E-06 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) were bigger than those of the exogenous exergy destruction rates. The environmental impacts of the exogenous exergy destruction rates of the steam evaporator (9.62E-07 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) and steam pump (2.92E-07 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)), however, were bigger than those of the exogenous exergy destruction rates. This shows that other equipment environmental impacts can be improved by focusing on the component itself, while the environmental impacts of the steam evaporator and steam pump depend on other components. The avoidable part of the environmental impact of the exergy destruction shows the improvable potential of the component or the system. The unavoidable part of the environmental impact of the exergy destruction rate shows the technological and economical limits of the improvement potential. The steam turbine (2.68E-06 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) and steam evaporator (2.44E-06 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) had bigger unavoidable environmental impacts of the exergy destruction rates, and the steam turbine (6.52E-07 pts.S\({}^{-1}\)) had a bigger avoidable environmental impact of the exergy destruction rate, [PERSON] et al. [47], [PERSON] [48]. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Component** & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{EN}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{EX}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{AV}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{UV}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{ENAV}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{ENIN}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{EXAV}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{LVIN}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{LVIN}\) & F (\%) \\  & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** \\ \hline
**ORC Condenser** & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - \\
**ORC evaporator** & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 91.67 \\
**ORC Pump** & 2.43E-07 & 2.11E-07 & 3.13E-08 & 2.76E-08 & 2.15E-07 & 2.40E-08 & 4.55E-16 & 3.55E-09 & 1.63E-25 & 74.92 \\
**ORC Requerquer** & 1.69E-07 & 1.42E-07 & 2.66E-08 & 1.72E-08 & 1.51E-07 & 1.45E-08 & 2.15E-16 & 2.72E-09 & 6.78E-26 & 66.45 \\
**ORC Turbine** & 6.11E-07 & 5.38E-07 & 7.26E-08 & 6.94E-08 & 5.41E-07 & 6.11E-08 & 2.91E-15 & 8.24E-09 & 2.40E-24 & 84.44 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 17: Advanced energy-environmental analysis for the standalone geothermal cycle (GPP).