## 5 Conclusions  
This research sought to find out the effect that economic, social, and environmental impacts perceived by the residents in a tourism destination have on satisfaction with the public administration of tourism. The citizens, under the perspective addressed, have a specific perception about the positive and negative effects that the tourism activity has on them. Phenomena of tourismphobia and situations of rejection of the public administration may arise when this perception is negative. This can have very adverse effects on the coexistence in the city and its image as a tourism destination. This is why to know the residents' perception about the economic, social, and environmental repercussion of tourism \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c} \hline \hline  & **Q2-predict** & **RMSE (PLSsem-LM)** \\ \hline Satisfaction with tourism & 0.617 & \\ SAT03 & 0.483 & \textasci{-}0.028 \\ SAT01 & 0.179 & \textasci{-}0.036 \\ SAT05 & 0.443 & \textasci{-}0.053 \\ SAT02 & 0.116 & \textasci{-}0.073 \\ SAT04 & 0.473 & \textasci{-}0.064 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Effects on the endogenous variables. can be useful for the public managers of tourism, who make great efforts of public procurement which is reflected, for example, in the search for major events or new air connections for the city. The attraction of sustainable tourism tends to be one of the priorities of public managers. However, the positive return on the investment necessary to attract the target of suitable tourism for the city is not recuperated directly, rather it is through the benefits which are obtained from the tourists that this public investment is justified. Nonetheless, we know that these visitors do not only produce economic benefits, there is also the inconvenience derived from the environmental damage which they can cause and, on the other hand, they have an influence on the city's socio-cultural field. Therefore, including indicators which are not only economic, but also social and environmental, as [PERSON] et al. (2018) postulate, must be considered a key strategic variable, which enables the political actors to know and understand to what extent the attraction of tourists is going to generate positive perceptions among the residents. These indicators, as has been revealed in this study, must not be only objective, but also subjective, as it will be the citizens' perceptions which determine their level of acceptation of tourism policies for their destination and, therefore, their readiness to welcome the tourists that the locality receives. We must highlight the great importance that residents accord to the positive economic impact which tourism produces in the city. The perception of the citizens is that their city is clearly seen to benefit from the generation of employment, the creation of new firms, and the attraction of investments, which improves their satisfaction with the public administration of tourism. The importance of the socio-cultural impact is also especially significant. This leads the citizens to be concerned by the effect that tourism has on the on the protection of the cultural heritage, employment among disadvantaged groups, and the improvement of the cultural, educational, and recreational means caused by the development of tourism. Although it has a significant influence, the environmental impact is in the last position in terms of its relative importance for the residents' satisfaction. This must serve as a clear call to the public managers that they have to increase their endeavor for the citizens to perceive that the environmental effort produces low environmental impacts and, therefore, there is an improvement of the quality of life in the city. Various limitations prevent the generalization of the study's results. A first limitation of our study is that it has only been carried out on a sample of residents in the city of Seville. The residents of this city in the south of Spain have their own cultural and social characteristics.