## 3 Results  
The summarized data can be seen in Tables 1 and 2. The stress peaks ranged from 364 MPa in the screw of the Bone-Level implant with a Standard connection to 681 MPa in the abutment, implant, and screw of the Tissue-Level implant with a Partial connection. The highest average was observed in the implant of the Tissue-Level implant with a Partial  
Figure 7: BL design with (**A**) Partial abutment joint and (**B**) Standard abutment joint. TL design with (**C**) Partial abutment joint and (**D**) Standard abutment joint. connection, while the lowest average was observed in the screw of the Bone-Level implant with a Standard connection. In general, the Bone-Level implants had lower average stress peaks than the Tissue-Level implants. The standard deviation was not bigger than 9 MPa, showing that the stress was homogenous. To observe significant differences between groups, [PERSON]'s test was performed. Observing the implant fixture, the Tissue-Level design showed a significant difference in the stress level when the connection with the implant, abutment, and screw was Partial. The most affected structure for the Tissue-Level design was the implant, and for the Bone-Level design, it was the abutment structure. For the implant, abutment, and screw, the Tissue-Level design showed a significant difference in terms of stress. It showed 13% more stress in the implant, abutment, and screw when the connection was Partial. However, for the Bone-Level design, not only was the stress 42% lower than that for the Tissue-Level design, but this model was also not affected by the contacting area at the connection. Figure 8 summarizes the stress maps for each group. In the Bone-Level implant, the stress was higher in the abutment neck near the screw head, which is displayed by the color red. The Bone-Level implant has colder colors in the abutment and in the implant, which illustrate lower stress magnitudes. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l l} \hline \hline
**Connection** & **Design** & **Region** & **Average** & **Std. Dev.** & **Min.** & **Max.** \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Standard} & Bone Level & abutment & 389.96 & 1.61 & 388 & 393 \\  & Bone Level & implant & 387.34 & 2.55 & 383 & 393 \\  & Bone Level & screw & 376.26 & 8.52 & 364 & 393 \\  & Tissue Level & abutment & 584.39 & 1.82 & 581 & 588 \\  & Tissue Level & implant & 584.91 & 1.67 & 582 & 588 \\  & Tissue Level & screw & 583.08 & 2.72 & 578 & 588 \\  & Bone Level & abutment & 389.81 & 1.70 & 387 & 393 \\  & Bone Level & implant & 387.99 & 2.25 & 384 & 393 \\ \multirow{2}{*}{Partial} & Bone Level & screw & 382.05 & 6.43 & 371 & 393 \\  & Tissue Level & abutment & 674.02 & 3.16 & 669 & 681 \\  & Tissue Level & implant & 676.74 & 1.57 & 673 & 681 \\  & Tissue Level & screw & 673.06 & 3.96 & 667 & 681 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Considering the factors of the design, connection, and region, 3-way ANOVA was performed. All the factors were significant, including their interaction, which was also a factor.  
\end{table} 
Table 1: Descriptive statistics from stress peaks according to implants’ components. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l} \hline \hline
**Analysis of Variance** & & & \\
**Source** & **DF** & **F-Value** & _p-Value_ \\ \hline connection & 1 & 45,032.50 & 0 \\ region & 2 & 312.28 & 0 \\ design & 1 & 1,249,304.51 & 0 \\ connection*region & 2 & 17.38 & 0 \\ connection*design & 1 & 41,047.01 & 0 \\ region*design & 2 & 163.38 & 0 \\ connection*region*design & 2 & 23.99 & 0 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Analysis of variance. There are also more variations in the colors for the Bone-Level implant than for the Tissue-Level implant. However, the Tissue-Level implant shows a high stress magnitude in the implant neck and a lower magnitude near the screw head compared to the Bone-Level implant. In addition, the Tissue-Level implant shows a larger surface with the color red, which shows the highest stress peaks. The difference between groups with similar implant designs is not qualitatively visible.