# Change in Water Quality of the Vistula River During the Emergency Discharge of Untreated Wastewater
## 3 Results and Discussion
It is also worth noting the valuable insights into how water conservation campaigns can be used as a tool for state security. The first article examines water reallocation strategies in Jordan, focusing on groundwater transfers from rural to urban areas, which parallels the themes of water redistribution due to the infrastructure challenges observed in the case of the Vistula River [74]. The second article deals with implementing water resource provision and use strategies [75]. The article addresses three social and economic aspects. The first aspect concerned the uncertainty of citizens and the state in securing adequate water resources. The second problem is the analysis of water conservation awareness program documents in Jordan. The third is the application of analytical methods and text interviews. Our article presents an environmental analysis of the impact of an emergency discharge of untreated sewage from Warsaw. The reader must understand the links between water security, state policy, and environmental management. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **TN** & \begin{tabular}{c} **N-** \\ **NO\({}_{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **N-** \\ **NO\({}_{2}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **N-** \\ **NH\({}_{4}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **TP** \\ **CO\({}_{4}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **P-** \\ **PO\({}_{4}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **SS** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **TDS** \\ **CO\({}_{4}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **EC** \\ **CO\({}_{4}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **SO\({}_{4}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **E** \\ **CO** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **E** \\ **CO** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **DØ** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **TOC** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline N-NO\({}_{3}\)\({}^{-}\) & **0.93** & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ N-NO\({}_{2}\)\({}^{-}\) & 0.13 & 0.17 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ N-NH\({}_{4}\)\({}^{+}\) & **0.94** & **0.99** & 0.16 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ TP & **0.89** & **0.91** & 0.18 & **0.91** & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ P-PO\({}_{4}\)\({}^{3+}\) & **0.84** & **0.88** & 0.18 & **0.88** & **0.92** & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ SS & 0.31 & 0.30 & n.s. & 0.31 & 0.38 & 0.36 & & & & & & & & & & & \\ TDS & 0.29 & 0.27 & n.s. & 0.29 & 0.31 & 0.29 & 0.53 & & & & & & & & & & \\ EC & 0.64 & 0.66 & 0.16 & 0.67 & 0.65 & 0.57 & 0.41 & 0.55 & & & & & & & & \\ SO\({}_{4}\)\({}^{2+}\) & 0.20 & 0.21 & \(-\)0.13 & 0.24 & 0.14 & 0.16 & 0.28 & 0.45 & 0.39 & & & & & & & & \\ CI & 0.21 & 0.19 & n.s. & 0.20 & 0.23 & 0.22 & 0.28 & 0.47 & 0.49 & 0.25 & & & & & & & \\ pH & \(-\)0.36 & \(-\)0.32 & n.s. & \(-\)0.30 & \(-\)0.32 & \(-\)0.31 & 0.18 & n.s. & n.s. & n.s. & n.s. & & & & & \\ COD & **0.83** & **0.84** & 0.13 & **0.84** & **0.86** & **0.82** & 0.46 & 0.33 & 0.58 & 0.18 & 0.21 & \(-\)0.22 & & & & & \\ DO & \(-\)0.45 & \(-\)0.48 & n.s. & \(-\)0.47 & \(-\)0.51 & \(-\)0.49 & n.s. & n.s. & 0.16 & n.s. & n.s. & 0.38 & \(-\)0.43 & & & & \\ TOC & **0.79** & **0.83** & n.s. & **0.83** & **0.78** & **0.74** & 0.24 & 0.23 & 0.51 & 0.24 & 0.22 & \(-\)0.35 & **0.74** & \(-\)0.49 & & & & \\ WT & 0.12 & n.s. & \(-\)0.20 & n.s. & 0.15 & n.s. & 0.48 & 0.28 & n.s. & 0.12 & 0.17 & 0.15 & 0.26 & n.s. & n.s. \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Bold figures are values of the correlation coefficient whose absolute value exceeds 0.7. n.s.—the correlation was not significantly different from zero.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: Pearson correlation coefficient between water quality parameters.