# Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Automatic Floor Plan Analysis Technology: An AHP-Based Assessment
## 5 Discussion and Conclusions
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Criteria**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Factor**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Manual**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Automatic**} \\ \cline{3-10}  & & **Point** & **Weight** & **Final Value** & **Ratio** & **Point** & **Weight** & **Final Value** & **Ratio** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Completeness (22)} & Technical development phase (7) & 3.54 & 0.708 & 4.96 & 71\% & 3.13 & 0.626 & 4.38 & 63\% \\  & Completeness of technology (8) & 3.37 & 0.674 & 5.39 & 67\% & 3.15 & 0.63 & 5.04 & 63\% \\  & Commercialization potential (8) & 2.94 & 0.588 & 4.70 & 59\% & 4.11 & 0.822 & 6.58 & 82\% \\  & & & & & **65\%** & & & & **70\%** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Distinctiveness (35)} & Novelty (6) & 2.22 & 0.444 & 2.66 & 44\% & 3.98 & 0.796 & 4.78 & 80\% \\  & Originality (8) & 2.35 & 0.47 & 3.76 & 47\% & 3.70 & 0.74 & 5.92 & 74\% \\  & Efficiency (21) & 2.50 & 0.5 & 10.50 & 50\% & 4.02 & 0.804 & 16.88 & 80\% \\  & & & & & **48\%** & & & & **79\%** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Substitutivity (25)} & Possibility of existence of similar & \multirow{3}{*}{3.06} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.612} & \multirow{3}{*}{9.79} & \multirow{3}{*}{61\%} & \multirow{3}{*}{3.76} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.752} & \multirow{3}{*}{12.03} & \multirow{3}{*}{75\%} \\  & technologies (16) & & & & & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1}  & Possibility of new technologies to & \multirow{3}{*}{3.35} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.67} & \multirow{3}{*}{5.36} & \multirow{3}{*}{67\%} & \multirow{3}{*}{3.56} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.712} & \multirow{3}{*}{5.70} & \multirow{3}{*}{71\%} \\  & emerge (8) & & & & & & & & **74\%** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Supply and demand (18)} & Demand from customers (15) & 3.22 & 0.644 & 9.66 & 64\% & 3.93 & 0.786 & 11.79 & 79\% \\  & Supply from providers (3) & 2.65 & 0.53 & 1.59 & 53\% & 3.17 & 0.634 & 1.90 & 63\% \\ \cline{1-1}  & & & & & **63\%** & & & & **76\%** \\ \cline{1-1}  & & & & & **58.38** & & & & **75.00** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Technology value of manual and automatic floor plan analysis. rather than automatic approach, and it is needed to acknowledge the value of manual editing technology itself. This study attempted an untried assessment in existing studies and has implications for presenting further objective evaluation criteria and assessment of automatic floor plan technology. Within the framework of this study, future work on floor plan analysis can be systematically accomplished. Conceptualization, H.K. ; methodology, H.K. ; validation, H.K. ; formal analysis, H.K. ; investigation, H.K. ; resources, H.K. ; data curation, H.K. ; writing--original draft preparation, H.K. ; writing--review and editing, H.K. ; supervision, H.K. ; project administration, H.K. ; funding acquisition, H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. This research was supported by a grant (21 NSIP-B135746-05) from National Spatial Information Research Program (NSIP) funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government. The author declares no conflict of interest.