## 4 Discussions
The intuitive image on the amplitude of decrease in _Installed power_ of the _F*-Organ_ is best depicted as follows: if the diffusion surface increases 4.5 times (56), and is directly proportional to the diffusion flow, an apparently paradoxical decrease (by 22.3%) in the flow ((52) and (53)), signifies a decrease in _Power P_ (47) caused by an increase in _time period_\(\tau\) ((46) and (48)), since _useful mechanical work_\(L_{\Pi}{}^{F^{*}}\) is directly proportional to _flow_: \(L_{\Pi}{}^{F^{*}}\)-\(V^{OF*}\) \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Volume Flow [cm3/24 h]**} \\ \hline
**Gas Type** & **O2** & **CO2** & **N2** & **Total Gas Mix** \\ \hline Newborn & 110.87 & 2317.97 & 858.87 & 3287.71 \\ Adult & 102.67 & 2146.44 & 795.31 & 2254.55 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Mean Volume Flow over 24 h for the real diffusion (_F*) of respiratory gases from the Middle-ear cavities to the internal environment of the human body. We consider that a more plastic description of the physical phenomena involved is necessary. As an example, everyone notices that after going for a day at the beach, the parent's inflatable mattress deflates annoyingly slower that the child's inflatable beach ball even though both valves have the same caliber. This valve situation is similar to the constant diffusion area \(A^{F}\) (\(F\)-_Organ_) throughout life. This underlines the relationship between _time_ and _volume_, perceived as physical parameters. The mattress deflates slower which means that the physical process parameter called _Power_ is small and inversely proportional to time. The inflatable ball is at least 10 times smaller and has more _Power_, thus deflating faster. This analogy depicts the most accessible parameter of the two thermodynamic systems we discussed (\(\varepsilon^{T}\)--_adult_ and \(\varepsilon^{T}\)--_newborn_)--_total volume \(V_{\varepsilon}\) of ME cavities_ for _adults_\(V^{a}_{\varepsilon}\) (20) and _newborns_\(V^{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{ \text{\text{\text{\text{\text  
This means that determining the maximum ratio of afflicted _D-cells_\(y_{j}^{MAX}\) is extremely important. The key to solving this problem is the fraction \(\Pi\) and its numeric value. As previously demonstrated, each of the functions D and F\({}^{*}\) have a fraction (\(\Pi^{D}\) and \(\Pi^{F^{*}}\)) completely defined by the lumen membrane surface of the _D-cell_, and the two fractions are complementary ((33) and (34)). This leads to:  
\[\Pi^{D}=\Pi^{F^{*}}=\Pi=\frac{1}{2} \tag{57}\]  
We consider axiomatically that \(\Pi=\frac{1}{2}\). This numeric value of \(\Pi\) has the following significance (Figure 4):  
1. Determines the numeric values of the ratio \(x_{j}\) of _healthy D-cells_ within the _D-cell population_: \[x_{j}^{\max}=2\Pi=1=100\%\] (58) \[x_{j}^{\min}=1-\Pi=0.5=50\%\] (59)
2. Determines the numeric values of the ratio \(y_{j}\) of _afflicted D-cells_: \[y_{j}^{\max}=1-x_{j}^{\min}=1-(1-\Pi)=0.5=50\%\] (60) \[y_{j}^{\min}=1-x_{j}^{\max}=1-2\Pi=0=0\%\] (61)
3. The determinations above are based on the sufficiently substantiated expression: \[x_{j}=1-y_{j}\] (62)  
Given the relations between the three terms: \(\Pi\), \(x_{j}\) and \(y_{j}\), we determine \(y_{j}^{MAX}\) by solving a system of first-degree algebraic equations. This system enunciates the following problem:  
* For which numeric value of \(\Pi^{*}\), the ratio of metabolic energy consumption \(Q^{D}_{Utt1}\) and \(Q^{D}_{Utt2}\) of the _D-cell_, measured at two different moments \(t_{1}\) and \(t_{2}\), becomes equal to 1 (one) (\(Q^{D}_{Utt1}=Q^{D}_{Utt2}\)) (\(Q^{D}_{Utt1}/Q^{D}_{Utt2}=I\)) (no decrease in energy consumption), and during the considered interval the area \(A^{D}\) increased by one unit [1 cm\({}^{2}\)] (\(A^{D}+1\))? Figure 4: Explanation of the significance on numerical values for the \(\Pi\) fraction.