# Artificial Intelligence Reinventing Materials Engineering: A Bibliometric Review
## 3 Results
Figure 2: Annual scientific production. three clusters, with Cluster 1 consisting of the most impactful sources. Cluster 1 was composed of 31 sources (14.9%) in which 90 documents (33.3%) were published. Cluster 2 consisted of 88 sources (42.3%) in which 91 documents (33.7%) were published. Cluster 3 was composed of 89 sources (42.8%) in which 89 documents (33.0%) were published. The most impactful sources based on [PERSON]'s law are presented in Table 3. Specifically, ranks 1-6 of Cluster 1 belonged to the following sources: _Advanced Materials_ (number of published documents: 7 and impact factor: 27.4), _MRS Bulletin_ (number of published documents: 5 and impact factor: 4.1), _Nanomaterials_ (number of published documents: 5 and impact factor: 4.4), _Materials_ (number of published documents: 4 and impact factor: 3.1), _MRS Communications_ (number of published documents: 4 and impact factor: 16.8), and _WIREs Computational Molecular Science_ (number of published documents: 4 and impact factor: 1.8). The remaining sources had fewer than three relevant documents published. Table 4 depicts the most impactful sources based on their published documents' h-index and total number of citations on the topic. It is worth noting that only three sources (_Advanced Materials_, _MRS Communications_, and _MRS Bulletin_) started publishing documents on this topic in 2019. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Sources** & **h-Index** & **g-Index** & **m-Index** & **TC** & _NP_ & **PY-Start** \\ \hline _Advanced Materials_ & 5 & 7 & 0.833 & 393 & 7 & 2019 \\ _Nanomaterials_ & 4 & 5 & 1 & 59 & 5 & 2021 \\ _Materials_ & 4 & 4 & 1.333 & 41 & 4 & 2022 \\ _npj Computational Materials_ & 3 & 3 & 1 & 161 & 3 & 2022 \\ _Advanced Intelligent Systems_ & 3 & 3 & 0.6 & 148 & 3 & 2020 \\ _MRS Communications_ & 3 & 4 & 0.5 & 144 & 4 & 2019 \\ _Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:_ & & & & & \\ _Computational Molecular Science_ & 3 & 4 & 0.6 & 114 & 4 & 2020 \\ _MRS Bulletin_ & 3 & 5 & 0.5 & 113 & 5 & 2019 \\ _Journal of Applied Physics_ & 3 & 3 & 0.6 & 110 & 3 & 2020 \\ _Advanced Energy Materials_ & 3 & 3 & 1 & 99 & 3 & 2022 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Most impactful sources based on their published documents’ h-index and total number of citations on this topic. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Source** & **Rank** & **Freq** & **cumFreq** & **Cluster** \\ \hline _Advanced Materials_ & 1 & 7 & 7 & Cluster 1 \\ _MRS Bulletin_ & 2 & 5 & 12 & Cluster 1 \\ _Nanomaterials_ & 3 & 5 & 17 & Cluster 1 \\ _Materials_ & 4 & 4 & 21 & Cluster 1 \\ _MRS_ & 5 & 4 & 25 & Cluster 1 \\ _WMEs_ & & & & \\ _Computational_ & 6 & 4 & 29 & Cluster 1 \\ _Molecular Science_ & & & & \\ _Acta Materialia_ & 7 & 3 & 32 & Cluster 1 \\ _Advanced Energy Materials_ & 8 & 3 & 35 & Cluster 1 \\ _Advanced_ & & & & \\ _Intelligent Systems_ & & & & \\ _Applied Sciences_ & & & & \\ (Switzerland) & 10 & 3 & 41 & Cluster 1 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Most impactful sources based on [PERSON]’s law. The most impactful documents that greatly contribute to the development of this topic can be identified by examining the total number of citations, the total number of citations per year, and the normalized total number of citations received globally. The related outcomes are presented in Table 5. Focusing on the total number of citations, it can be observed that the top 10 documents have all received over 100 citations, with most of them having over 200 citations. The study of [10] (382 citations) has received most citations, followed by the study of [11] (322 citations). When focusing on the total number of citations received per year to identify the document's annual influence, the study of [10] (76.4 citations received per year) and the study of [12] (71.75 citations received per year) were the only ones that received over 70 citations per year.