## 1 Introduction
According to results, the storage tank had the highest cost of exergy destruction and the highest rate of exergy destruction based on the conventional exergy. Furthermore, relevant to the advanced exergy analysis, 5.26 of the 7.3 kW endogenous exergy destruction rate is unavoidable. Thus, even technological development cannot avoid the endogenous exergy destruction. [PERSON] et al. [21] studied the destruction rate of unavoidable exergy and effective parameters on pipeline transportation process. The destruction rate of unavoidable exergy was defined as the evaluation index based on the exergy analysis including the coefficient of exergy destruction rate and exergy destruction. For example, the changes of the unavoidable exergy destruction rate were considered in an oil pipeline under different parameters designed. To compare the different effective values on the pipeline's unavoidable exergy destruction rate, an orthogonal experiment method was used. The results revealed that diameter, buried depth and insulation thickness can obtain the reference based on energy-saving for the transportation from a crude oil pipeline. [PERSON] et al. [22] conductedan advanced exergy analysis to report the exergy destruction of components and the efficiency of the integrated solar cycle. The whole power plant was analyzed hourly within a day. According to results, there was a reduction of 5.14% in exergy degradation during summer and a reduction of 2.2% during winter. As solar radiation increased, the efficiency of the solar power plant reached 42.16% in winter and 47.5% in summer. Additionally, as the input of the solar energy system was increased, the exergy destruction of the Rankine cycle was increased. Moreover, the largest exergy destruction rate belonged to the generator based on heat recovery and the turbines with values of 11.26% and 13.63%, respectively. [PERSON] and [PERSON] [23] studied the thermodynamic impact of a thermal system from first and second thermodynamic law perspectives and reported the potentials for improving performance of components. In the conventional exergy analysis, the efficiency of exergy for the heater and air preheater were 40.9% and 39.3%, respectively. In the advanced exergy analysis, efficiencies were increased up to 52.4% and 85.8%, respectively. [PERSON] and [PERSON] [24] investigated the interaction between the components of a system and the improvement potential using advanced exergy. Results illustrated the avoidable exergy destruction cost rate of 29%, of which 32% belonged to the components and 68% belonged to the interaction between them. A more recent study by [PERSON] et al. [25] used concentrated solar power for a hybrid solar-geothermal power plant that generates dispatchable power and uses a flashing system. It must be noted that a geothermal unit supplemented thermal solar system was used to generate electricity [PERSON] et al. [26]. Most of the studies on hybrid systems pertain to geothermal-solar units that use photovoltaic (PV) for the production of excess electric power during the peak demand period or use the geothermal fluid for heating. Solar-geothermal hybrid electric power plant (SGHEPP) using open flash Rankine cycles were initially studied by [PERSON] and [PERSON] [27; 28] who proposed a model for adding a Direct Steam Generation solar field to the Cerro Prieto geothermal flash plant in Mexico. The objective is to obtain a 10% increase in steam flow by adding parabolic trough (PT) collectors at different points in the geothermal cycle. In the proposed system the geothermal brine is run directly through the PT collectors, which they noted may cause scaling problems in practice. [PERSON] et al. [29; 30] continued research on binary SGHEPs by analyzing supercritical and subcritical binary cycles under Australian climatic conditions. Results show that the supercritical plant produces 4%-17% more electricity compared to the subcritical plant with the same geothermal resource use.