# CoNTe: A Core Network Temporal Blockchain for 5G
## 3 Federated Byzantine Agreement Consensus
### Transaction and Protocol Messages
Available online: [[https://althea.net/whitepaper](https://althea.net/whitepaper)]([https://althea.net/whitepaper](https://althea.net/whitepaper)) (accessed on 12 April 2020). * (10) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Survey: Sharding in Blockchains. _IEEE Access_**2020**, \(8\), 14155-14181. [CrossRef]
* (11) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] General State Channel Networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Toronto, ON, Canada, 15-19 October 2018; pp. 949-966. [CrossRef]
* (12) [PERSON]; [PERSON] Casper the Friendly Finality Gadget. _arXiv_**2017**, arXiv:1710.09437. Available online: [[http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437](http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437)]([http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437](http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437)) (accessed on 18 June 2020). * (13) [PERSON] Tendermint: Byzantine Fault Tolerance in the Age of Blockchains. 2016. Available online: [[https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/buchman2016](https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/buchman2016) tendermint.pdf]([https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/buchman2016](https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/buchman2016) tendermint.pdf) (accessed on 14 April 2020). * (14) [PERSON] The stellar consensus protocol: A federated model for internet-level consensus. _Stellar Dev. Found._**2015**, _32_, 1-45. [CrossRef]
* (15) The Linux Foundation. Hyperledger Sawtooth. 2020. Available online: [[https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/sawtooth](https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/sawtooth)]([https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/sawtooth](https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/sawtooth)) (accessed on 25 August 2019). * (16) ETSI. 5G System Architecture for the 5G System (3 GPP TS 23.501 Version 15.3.0 Release 15). 2018. Available online: [[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123500_123599/123501/15.03.00_60/ts_123501v](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123500_123599/123501/15.03.00_60/ts_123501v)]([https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123500_123599/123501/15.03.00_60/ts_123501v](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123500_123599/123501/15.03.00_60/ts_123501v)) 150300p.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2020). * (17) 3 GPP. Common API Framework (CAPIF). 2019. Available online: [https://www.3 gpp.org/common-api-fr/amework-capif](https://www.3 gpp.org/common-api-fr/amework-capif) (accessed on 14 April 2020). * (18) [PERSON]; [PERSON] How to Time-Stamp a Digital Document. _J. Cryptol._**1991**, \(3\), 99-111. [CrossRef]
* (19) [PERSON] _Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System_; GitHub: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016. * (20) [PERSON]; [PERSON] Blockchain-assisted information distribution for the internet of things. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, San Diego, CA, USA, 4-6 August 2017; pp. 75-78. [CrossRef]
* (21) [PERSON] Blockchain Meets IoT: An Architecture for Scalable Access Management in IoT. _IEEE Internet Things J._**2018**, \(5\), 1184-1195. [CrossRef]
* (22) [PERSON] Tokenization of Physical Assets and the Impact of IoT and AI. Ph.D. Thesis, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences, Luzern, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1-15. * (23) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Blockchain-based intelligent network management for 5g and beyond. In Proceedings of the 2019 3 rd International Conference on Advanced Information and Communications Technologies (AICT 2019), Lviv, Ukraine, 2-6 July 2019; pp. 36-39. [CrossRef]
* (24) [PERSON] Ethereum Whitepaper. 2013. Available online: [[https://ethereum.org/whitepaper/](https://ethereum.org/whitepaper/)]([https://ethereum.org/whitepaper/](https://ethereum.org/whitepaper/)) (accessed on 14 April 2019). * (25) [PERSON] Rethinking Permissioned Blockchains [Extended Abstract]. _IBM Res._**2017**, 3-7. [CrossRef]
* (26) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] A Survey on the Scalability of Blockchain Systems. _IEEE Netw._**2019**, 33, 166-173. [CrossRef]
* (27) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process. _J. Assoc. Comput. Mach._**1985**, 32, 374-382.