## 5 Conclusions
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Site**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Profile**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Layer**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Best Model**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**AICcWt**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**2 nd Best Model**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**AICcWt**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**ER**} \\ \hline HOE & A & M01 & LM & 0.552 & LMTC & 0.215 & 2.57 \\  & & M12 & QM & 0.468 & LM & 0.308 & 1.52 \\  & & M24 & LMTC & 0.690 & QMTC & 0.181 & 3.81 \\  & & M48 & LMTC & 0.395 & LM & 0.368 & 1.07 \\  & B & M01 & QM & 0.374 & LM & 0.306 & 1.23 \\  & & M12 & LM & 0.532 & QM & 0.296 & 1.80 \\  & & M24 & LMTC & 0.612 & QMTC & 0.228 & 2.68 \\  & & M48 & LM & 0.389 & LMTC & 0.264 & 1.47 \\  & C & M01 & LM & 0.462 & LMTC & 0.287 & 1.61 \\  & & M12 & LM & 0.530 & QM & 0.304 & 1.74 \\  & & M24 & LM & 0.630 & QM & 0.170 & 3.70 \\  & & M48 & LM & 0.720 & QM & 0.176 & 4.08 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: _Cont._ \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Coefficients**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Prediction Quality**} \\ \hline
**Site** & **Profile** & **Layer** & **Model** & **C0** & **C1** & **C2** & \(\mathbf{R^{2}}_{\text{adj}}\) & **RMSPE** & \(\mathbf{d_{r}}\) \\ \hline GON & A & M01 & LM & \(-0.70751\) & \(0.043\) & - & \(0.516\) & \(0.0677\) & \(0.618\) \\  & & M12 & QM & \(3.422366\) & \(-0.27949\) & \(0.006171\) & \(0.697\) & \(0.0461\) & \(0.723\) \\  & & M24 & LMTC & \(-0.28558\) & \(0.02309\) & - & \(0.803\) & \(0.0409\) & \(0.814\) \\  & & M48 & LMTC & \(0.064455\) & \(0.008269\) & - & \(0.239\) & \(0.0755\) & \(0.545\) \\  & B & OFH & LM & \(-0.450262\) & \(0.033966\) & - & \(0.716\) & \(0.0591\) & \(0.749\) \\  & & M12 & LMTC & \(-0.309709\) & \(0.02574\) & - & \(0.509\) & \(0.0588\) & \(0.625\) \\  & & M24 & LMTC & \(-0.42131\) & \(0.022229\) & - & \(0.456\) & \(0.0589\) & \(0.616\) \\  & & M48 & LM & \(0.167012\) & \(0.008683\) & - & \(0.057\) & \(0.0618\) & \(0.513\) \\  & C & OFH & LM & \(-0.450262\) & \(0.033966\) & - & \(0.716\) & \(0.0591\) & \(0.749\) \\  & & M12 & LM & \(-0.389548\) & \(0.027291\) & - & \(0.124\) & \(0.075\) & \(0.513\) \\  & & M24 & LM & \(-0.68547\) & \(0.032331\) & - & \(0.266\) & \(0.0468\) & \(0.558\) \\  & & M48 & LM & \(0.22404\) & \(0.004552\) & - & \(0.003\) & \(0.0998\) & \(0.495\) \\ \hline HOE & A & M01 & LM & \(-0.32741\) & \(0.026886\) & - & \(0.576\) & \(0.0442\) & \(0.685\) \\  & & M12 & QM & \(-2.7324\) & \(0.202518\) & \(-0.00324\) & \(0.916\) & \(0.0201\) & \(0.872\) \\  & & M24 & LMTC & \(-0.95799\) & \(0.043073\) & - & \(0.73\) & \(0.0269\) & \(0.77\) \\  & & M48 & LMTC & \(-0.64529\) & \(0.032059\) & - & \(0.705\) & \(0.0227\) & \(0.74\) \\  & B & M01 & QM & \(-1.56127\) & \(0.128421\) & \(-0.00204\) & \(0.835\) & \(0.0287\) & \(0.793\) \\  & & M12 & LM & \(-0.46119\) & \(0.030068\) & - & \(0.955\) & \(0.019\) & \(0.91\) \\  & & M24 & LMTC & \(-0.63709\) & \(0.032494\) & - & \(0.797\) & \(0.0288\) & \(0.779\) \\  & & M48 & LM & \(-0.88683\) & \(0.0411\) & - & \(0.66\) & \(0.0244\) & \(0.718\) \\  & C & M01 & LM & \(0.022978\) & \(0.016508\) & - & \(0.374\) & \(0.0547\) & \(0.602\) \\  & & M12 & LM & \(-0.29728\) & \(0.024898\) & - & \(0.865\) & \(0.0245\) & \(0.823\) \\  & & M24 & LM & \(-0.35907\) & \(0.026401\) & - & \(0.67\) & \(0.0361\) & \(0.686\) \\  & & M48 & LM & \(-0.83325\) & \(0.04117\) & - & \(0.749\) & \(0.0218\) & \(0.74\) \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Cont. Figure 12: Soil water content (m\({}^{3}\) m\({}^{-3}\)) according to standard and recalibrated functions for each profile and layer of the RAV plot with indication of field capacity and permanent wilting point for mineral soils (dashed lines). Figure 13: Soil water content (m\({}^{3}\) m\({}^{-3}\)) according to standard and recalibrated functions for each profile and layer of the BRA plot with indication of field capacity and permanent wilting point for mineral soils (dashed lines).