# Effective Data Utilization in the Context of Industry 4.0 Technology Integration
## 3 Research Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Number of Employees**} \\ \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**1 to 9**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**10 to 49**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**50 to 249**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**250 and More**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Overall**} \\ \hline  & \begin{tabular}{c} **Absolute** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Relative** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Absolute** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Relative** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Absolute** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Relative** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Absolute** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Relative** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Absolute** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Relative** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Absolute** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Relative** \\ **Frequency** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline we have been & & & & & & & & & & & \\ implementing Industry & 4.0 technologies for a & 3 & 19\% & 2 & 8\% & 16 & 25\% & 118 & 51\% & 139 & 41\% \\ long time and plan to & & & & & & & & & & & \\ continue doing so & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline we are not currently & & & & & & & & & & & \\ implementing Industry & 4.0 technologies, & & & & & & & & & & & \\ but we plan to & & & & & & & & & & & \\ implement them & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline we do not currently & & & & & & & & & & & \\ implement Industry & 4.0 technologies and & & & & & & & & & & \\ do not plan to & & & & & & & & & & & \\ implement them & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline do not know & 6 & 38\% & 12 & 48\% & 27 & 42\% & 75 & 32\% & 120 & 32\% \\ \hline other & 0 & 0\% & 0 & 0\% & 0 & 0\% & 1 & 0\% & 1 & 0\% \\ overall & 16 & 100\% & 25 & 100\% & 64 & 100\% & 233 & 100\% & 338 & 100\% \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Two cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.43.  
\end{table} 
Table 3: Implementation of Industry 4.0 in the organization. Figure 4 represents the percentage of Industry 4.0 implementation depending on the size of the organization. Based on the Chi-square test, the calculated correlation coefficient, and the graphical representation, we can confirm that the implementation of Industry 4.0 depended on the size of the organization. The larger the organization, the more likely it was to implement the different technologies of Industry 4.0. A uniform deployment of all technologies of Industry 4.0 in the conditions of industrial organizations is neither possible nor reasonable. Organizations usually deploy those parts of Industry 4.0 technologies without which the functioning of smart organization systems would not be possible at any given moment. For this reason, we defined another research question, where we researched which technologies of Industry 4.0 are most frequently implemented in industrial organizations. In this case, it can be assumed that the COVID-19 pandemic has acted as a catalyst in the introduction of technologies related to digitalization. RQ3: Which technologies of Industry 4.0 are implemented in the organizations? Based on the responses of respondents from each industrial organization (Figure 5), we identified that the most commonly deployed element was Cloud Computing, indicated by 138 (41%) respondents, followed by Autonomous Robots, indicated by 127 (38%) respondents and Cybersecurity, with 107 (32%) respondents. A surprising result was that the Industry 4.0 Internet of Things (IoT) element was marked by only 45 (13%) respondents. IoT is used to connect Cyber-Physical systems with cloud solutions and we did not assume that organizations did not have their systems interconnected. We can only state that this is an anomaly when respondents did not have enough knowledge regarding IoT and thus could not properly define the operation of this technology within an organization.