## 2 Results and Discussion
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Compounds** & **Ret. Time** & **Ident.** & **F1 (mg/kg,** & **F2 (mg/kg,** & **F3 (mg/kg,** \\  & **(min) a** & **(ST/Qual. \%) b** & **Mean \(\pm\) S.D.) c** & **Mean \(\pm\) S.D.) c** & **Mean \(\pm\) S.D.) c** \\ \hline _Monoterpens_ & & & & & \\ \(\alpha\)-pinene & 5.01 & CTA & 6120.28 \(\pm\) 480.41 & 2547.44 \(\pm\) 167.02 & 712.71 \(\pm\) 56.82 \\ Camphene & 5.40 & CTA & 207.38 \(\pm\) 17.6 & 62.94 \(\pm\) 5.94 & 13.21 \(\pm\) 2.30 \\ \(\beta\)-pinene & 6.08 & CTA/B & 1703.88 \(\pm\) 217.10 & 422.61 \(\pm\) 36.67 & 53.36 \(\pm\) 4.18 \\ \(\beta\)-myrcene & 6.41 & 97 & 19,314.47 \(\pm\) 830.54 & 6646.57 \(\pm\) 481.01 & 285.35 \(\pm\) 17.79 \\ \(\delta\)-3-carene & 6.79 & CTA/B & 86.35 \(\pm\) 20.35 & 48.72 \(\pm\) 6.97 & 9.14 \(\pm\) 0.93 \\ limonene & 7.40 & CTA/B & 6030.37 \(\pm\) 103.55 & 991.04 \(\pm\) 75.96 & 34.26 \(\pm\) 9.21 \\ \(\gamma\)-terpinene & 8.17 & CTA & 92.97 \(\pm\) 6.06 & - & - \\ \(\alpha\)-terpinolene & 8.90 & CTB & 80.79 \(\pm\) 19.84 & - & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Terpenes present in olive oil fractions obtained after inflorescards decarboxylation, expressed as mg/kg oil (mean \(\pm\) standard deviation), shown in SPME/GC-MS analyses. The oil obtained from a 1:1:1 mixture of F1, F2 and F3 and its dilution to 1 L in total (Mix. F1 \(\div\) 3 dil., Table 3) displayed 5733.97 \(\pm\) 167.35 mg/kg of terpenes, while 9775.56 \(\pm\) 678.04 and 10,672.39 \(\pm\) 723.05 mg/kg are the total terpene contents of the oils obtained from MAE at 60 and 100 \({}^{\circ}\)C, respectively, showing a significant difference from initial sample (Ext. 60 and Ext. 100, [PERSON]'s post hoc test groups for Totals in Table 3). While Mix F1 \(\div\) 3 dil. was observed to predominantly contain monoterpenes and monoterpenoids (Figures 5 and 6), the olive oils obtained from the MAE of decarboxylated infloresances indicated the presence of different compounds, especially sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpenoids (sign + in Table 3 and zoom of Figures 5 and 6 on the right). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Compounds** & **Ret. Time** & **Ident.** & **F1 (mg/kg,** & **F2 (mg/kg,** & **F3 (mg/kg,** \\
**(min) a** & **(ST/Qual. \%) b** & **Mean \(\pm\) S.D.) c** & **Mean \(\pm\) S.D.) c** & **Mean \(\pm\) S.D.) c** \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{_Monoterpenoids_} \\ \(\mathrm{L}\)-fenchone & 9.08 & CTA & 55.71 \(\pm\) 21.62 & - & - \\ \(\mathrm{L}\)inalool & 9.30 & CTB & 543.50 \(\pm\) 79.71 & - & - \\ \(\mathrm{D}\)-\(\alpha\)-Fenchyl alcohol & 9.90 & CTA & 193.47 \(\pm\) 24.52 & 92.18 \(\pm\) 11.02 & 91.13 \(\pm\) 7.16 \\ \(\mathrm{Borneol}\)\(\mathrm{L}\) & 11.43 & CTB & 34.93 \(\pm\) 2.85 & - & - \\ \(\mathrm{Terpinen}\)-4-ol & 11.67 & 90 & 17.48 \(\pm\) 2.36 & - & - \\ \(\mathrm{\alpha}\)-terpineol & 12.10 & CTB & 80.50 \(\pm\) 8.04 & - & - \\ \multicolumn{6}{c}{_Sesquiterpenes_} \\ \multicolumn{6}{c}{_trans_-\(\beta\)-caryophyllene} \\ \(\mathrm{\alpha}\)-bergamonte & 17.90 & CTB & 2724.93 \(\pm\) 615.49 & - & - \\ \(\mathrm{\alpha}\)-bergamonte & 18.20 & 91 & 31.76 \(\pm\) 5.56 & - & - \\ \(\mathrm{\alpha}\)-farmesene & 18.75 & 96 & 11.69 \(\pm\) 9.70 & 8.09 \(\pm\) 1.11 & 9.61 \(\pm\) 0.54 \\ \(\mathrm{\alpha}\)-humulene & 18.87 & CTA & 59.93 \(\pm\) 19.79 & - & - \\ \(\mathrm{\alpha}\)-seline & 19.89 & 92 & 6.54 \(\pm\) 4.80 & - & - \\ \(\mathrm{\beta}\)-bisabolene & 20.00 & 91 & 16.56 \(\pm\) 12.39 & - & - \\ \multicolumn{6}{c}{Selina-3,7(11)diene} \\ \hline Total & - & - & 37,390.38 \(\pm\) 723.16 & 10,819.59 \(\pm\) 187.83 & 1208.78 \(\pm\) 31.12 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* GC-MS retention times (minutes). b Identification by means of standard mixture: _Camuabis_ terpene A and B (CTA and CTB) or by means of GC-MS libraries with indication of qualifier (%). c S.D. = Standard deviation.  
\end{table} 
Table 2: _Cont._  
Figure 3: Hundred-percent stacked column representation of the average ppm data from Table 2, obtained from SPME/GC-MS analyses.