## 3 Results
### Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) Credits and Category  
Table 8 shows the results for the EQ credits and categories. Only one credit, EQc2.4 (Daylight and Views), of the 15 total EQ credits was achieved to a similarly high degree (PAS = 64 and PAS = 63 in Finland and Spain, respectively) in version 3 of the certification. Interestingly, in version 3, for EQc2.1 (Occupant Comfort--Occupant Survey) and EQc3.2 (Green Cleaning--Custodial Effectiveness Assessment), Finland showed better results than Spain (PAS = 71 and PAS = 79 for Finland and PAS = 38 and PAS = 44 for Spain, respectively). However, in EQc1.1 (Indoor Air Quality Management Program) and EQc3.6 (Green Cleaning--Indoor Integrated Pest Management) in version 3, Spain showed better results than Finland (PAS = 69 and PAS = 63 for Spain and PAS = 21 and PAS = 21 for Finland, respectively). In version 4, Spain increased their achievement in EQc10 (Occupant Comfort Survey) and EQc6 (Green Cleaning--Custodial Effectiveness Assessment), while Finland increased their achievement in EQc1 (Indoor Air Quality Management Program) and EQc9 (Integrated Pest Management). In this way, in version 4, these four credits resulted in similarly high achievements for both Finland and Spain \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Credit (Max Points) 4** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Percent Averaged Score (PAS)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**\(p\)-Value (Effect Size)**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**SH 1**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**SL 2**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**DF 3**} \\ \cline{2-6}  & **Finland** & **Spain** & & & & \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{LEED Existing Buildings: Operations and Maintenance v3 (LEED-EB v3)} \\ \hline EQc1.1 (1) & 21 & 69 & **0.0081** (\(-\)2.09) a & & & \\ EQc1.2 (1) & 0 & 0 & 0.5000 (0.13) a & & & \\ EQc1.3 (1) & 93 & 56 & **0.0258** (2.31) a & & & \\ EQc1.4 (1) & 100 & 50 & **0.0016** (3.37) a & & & \\ EQc1.5 (1) & 14 & 63 & **0.0064** (\(-\)2.30) a & & & \\ EQc2.1 (1) & 71 & 38 & **0.0537** (1.43) a & & & \\ EQc2.2 (1) & 57 & 0 & **0.0003** (3.76) a & & & \\ EQc2.3 (1) & 7 & 0 & 0.2333 (1.30) a & & & \\ EQc2.4 (1) & 64 & 63 & 0.8533 (0.08) a & & & \\ EQc3.1 (1) & 43 & 38 & 0.8610 (0.22) a & & & \\ EQc3.2 (1) & 79 & 44 & **0.0476** (1.55) a & & & \\ EQc3.3 (1) & 71 & 13 & **0.0015** (2.86) a & & & \\ EQc3.4 (1) & 14 & 31 & 0.3016 (\(-\)1.00) a & & & \\ EQc3.5 (1) & 93 & 31 & **0.0004** (3.35) a & & & \\ EQc3.6 (1) & 21 & 63 & **0.0208** (\(-\)1.81) a & & & \\ EQ total (15) & 50 & 37 & _0.0773_ (0.38) b & & & \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{LEED Existing Buildings: Operations and Maintenance v4 (LEED-EB v4)} \\ \hline EQc1 (2) & 100 & 94 & 0.7333 (1.03) a & & & \\ EQc2 (2) & 100 & 47 & _0.0697_ (2.35) a & & & \\ EQc3 (1) & 0 & 6 & 0.7333 (\(-\)1.03) a & & & \\ EQc4 (2) & 0 & 3 & 0.7333 (\(-\)1.03) a & & & \\ EQc5 (4) & 4 & 47 & **0.0001** (\(-\)3.66) a & & & \\ EQc6 (1) & 93 & 63 & **0.0584** (2.05) a & & & \\ EQc7 (1) & 71 & 52 & 0.2094 (0.92) a & & & \\ EQc8 (1) & 0 & 50 & **0.0016** (\(-\)3.37) a & & & \\ EQc9 (2) & 79 & 94 & 0.2092 (\(-\)1.41) a & & & \\ EQc10 (1) & 79 & 75 & 0.8373 (0.20) a & & & \\ EQ total (17) & 48 & 49 & 0.3185 (\(-\)0.21) b & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Similarly high (SH) achievements. 2 Similarly low (SL) achievements. 3 Different (DF) achievements. 4 Full EQ credit titles are given in Appendix A, Table A5. 4 [PERSON]’s exact \(2\times 2\) test and the \(\ln\theta\) test were used. b The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney (WMW) exact test and [PERSON] § test were used. \(p\)-values were evaluated according to the following three-valued logic: seems to be positive (bold font); seems to be negative (ordinary font size); and judgment is suspended (italic font).  
\end{table} 
Table 8: Statistical analysis of achieved points in the Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) credits for LEED-EB v3 and v4 large office-type projects in Finland and Spain. (PAS = 63-100). In addition, EQc7 (Green Cleaning--Products and Materials) also performed well in Finland and Spain, with high PASs of 71 and 52, respectively.