## 3 Results
### Complete  
In the complete scenario illustrated in Figure 14 and detailed in Table 10, according to the responses, the majority of the awareness modules should be continuously displayed. The modules _Augmented olfaction, People, C2-FR connection_ and _Temperature and humidity_ show variability between two options: to show information _\"Constantly\"_ or _\"Only if there is anomalous information\"_. The extension of this information analyzed by task depicted in Figure 15 confirms this conclusion about the frequency of occurrence of the awareness modules. The additional information provided by this figure is the visualization of rare situations where users have indicated that the frequency of appearance of some modules should be _Never_.  
The number of modules that should be deployed in the interface in general is around 9, as can be seen in Figure 16 and Table 11. The EMS FR profile reduces its average to 8, and the Hazmat Incidents go up to 13 with respect to the numbers collected in the rescue scenario shown in Table 7.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Awareness Module** & **Mean** & **Std** \\ \hline Robust vision & 2.89 & 0.31 \\ Signs of life & 2.73 & 0.56 \\ Wireless finder & 2.67 & 0.58 \\ Battery level & 2.62 & 0.59 \\ Radar & 2.56 & 0.60 \\ C2-FR connection & 2.55 & 0.60 \\ Augmented olfaction tool & 2.45 & 0.50 \\ People & 2.44 & 0.66 \\ Heart rate & 2.38 & 0.78 \\ Temperature, humidity & 2.35 & 0.64 \\ Breath rate & 2.31 & 0.79 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 10: Statistics of appearing frequency results corresponding to all participants in complete mode.  
Figure 14: Appearing frequency results corresponding to all participants in complete mode.  
The prioritization statistics in Table 12 and Figure 17 also resemble the results of the rescue scenario. The prioritized modules are those related to victim detection, such as _Signs of life_, _People_, _Robust vision_, _Wireless finder_ and _Radar_. Analyzing these results in more detail in Figure 18 and Table 13, where the priority order is arranged by tasks, it is observed that firefighters, Natural Disaster and Search and Rescue FRs share the same priority results, where the _Signs of life_ module is given a little more priority by Firefighters and Natural Disaster FRs. The other prioritized modules are _Robust vision_, _Radar_, _People_ and _C2-FR connection_. EMS FRs, on the other hand, prioritize the following awareness modules: _People_, _Augmented olfaction_, _Signs of life_ and _Radar_. Finally, Hazmat Incident FRs prioritize _Augmented olfaction_, _Breath and heart rate_, _Robust vision_ and _Wireless finder_. These distributions are even more evident in the task graphs visualized in Figure 19.  
Figure 17: Priority ordering results corresponding to all participants in complete mode.  
Figure 18: Priority ordering results categorized according to mission types in complete mode.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline
**Awareness** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Emergency and**} & & & & \\
**Module** & **Medical System** & **Hazmat Incidents** & **Firegighter** & **Natural Disasters** & **Search and Rescue** \\ \hline Augmented & 4.15 & 1.0 & 5.80 & 5.80 & 5.83 \\ olfaction tool & 6.45 & 4.0 & 5.83 & 5.83 & 5.86 \\ Breath rate & 6.45 & 1.0 & 7.33 & 7.33 & 7.25 \\ C2-FR connection & 5.70 & 3.0 & 4.50 & 4.50 & 4.86 \\ Heart rate & 6.08 & 1.0 & 6.25 & 6.25 & 6.40 \\ People & 3.86 & 2.0 & 4.17 & 4.17 & 4.14 \\ Radar & 4.88 & 3.0 & 4.00 & 4.00 & 4.60 \\ Robust Vision & 5.57 & 1.0 & 3.33 & 3.33 & 3.86 \\ Signs of life & 4.73 & 2.0 & 2.80 & 2.80 & 3.50 \\ Temperature, & 5.60 & 3.0 & 7.33 & 7.33 & 6.50 \\ humidity & 5.57 & 1.0 & 3.60 & 3.60 & 4.17 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 13: Pondered weight for priority ordering results configured in complete mode.