## 7 Conclusions
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c} \hline
**Type** & **Device Architecture** & **V\({}_{\text{oc}}\) (V)** & **J\({}_{\text{oc}}\) (mA/cm\({}^{2}\))** & **FF (\%)** & **PCE (\%)** & **Published Year** & **Ref.** \\ \hline  & TTO/PMT: CdSe N/CAI & 0.70 & 5.70 & 40.0 & 1.7 & 2002 & [18] \\  & ITO/PEDD: PSS/SHT-FP/C CdSe N/CAI & 0.90 & 2.03 & 47.0 & 0.85 & 2006 & [22] \\  & ITO/PEDD:PSS/SHT:CMS/BCP/TMg-Ag & 1.10 & 10.90 & 35.0 & 4.1 & 2011 & [34] \\ A & ITO/PEDD:PSS/PDPDIT:CMS/BCP/TMEI/A & 0.69 & 10.17 & 57.0 & 3.99 & 2014 & [36] \\  & ITO/PEDD:PSS/SPIT:CMS/BCP/A & 0.73 & 7.40 & 54.0 & 2.9 & 2013 & [37] \\  & ITO/PEDD:PSS/PCPDIT:CMS/BCP/TMEI/A & 0.74 & 12.80 & 50.0 & 4.7 & 2013 & [37] \\  & ITO/PEDD:PSS/PCPDIT:PPS/TD/A/B & 0.57 & 13.06 & 51.0 & 3.78 & 2011 & [47] \\  & ITO/PEDD:PSS/SPIT:PPT/PPS/TD/A/B & 0.48 & 18.20 & 55.0 & 4.78 & 2016 & [50] \\ \hline  & ITO/TiO/CdTe/MEI-PPV:CdTe/MoO/Au & 0.60 & 13.56 & 51.7 & 4.20 & 2016 & [57] \\  & ITO/TiO/CdTe/HTO:CdTe/MoMo/Au & 0.54 & 16.99 & 47.2 & 4.32 & 2015 & [58] \\ B & ITO/TiO/CdTe/TiO:CdTe/PTO:CdTe/MoMo/Au & 0.615 & 18.90 & 51.7 & 6.01 & 2018 & [59] \\  & ITO/ZnO/CdTe/ZnO/CdTe/PVC/TMeMo/Au & 0.62 & 19.50 & 53.9 & 6.51 & 2019 & [60] \\  & ITO/ZnO/PDS/PDIT:T-E-IEICE/MoO/Ag & 0.66 & 29.60 & 67.0 & 13.1 & 2019 & [63] \\ \hline  & Glass/Sn/Sn/Sn/CdTe/SO/CdTe/PDPDIT:CMS/BCP/TMEI/A/Au & 0.71 & 21.42 & 60.0 & 9.1 & 2016 & [71] \\ C & ITO/TiO/CdTe/SO/CdTe/CdTe/TaI/Au & 0.71 & 18.78 & 49.2 & 6.56 & 2016 & [72] \\  & ITO/ZnO/CdSe/CdTe/Si-TPA/Au & 0.66 & 23.38 & 54.1 & 8.34 & 2018 & [73] \\  & ITO/ZnO/Cd/CdSe/CdTe/Te-TPA/Au & 0.72 & 25.31 & 50.5 & 9.20 & 2019 & [75] \\ \hline  & ITO/ZnO/FFN-g/PEDB:T-A/MTO/T/ZO/OTB/T-InoGT-4:FPC/T & 1.64 & 14.35 & 73.7 & 17.36 & 2018 & [76] \\  & ITO/PrS/WO/Al/FM:TF:CBM/Al & 0.89 & 3.90 & 53.0 & 1.8 & 2014 & [80] \\  & ITO/PrS/WC/Mo/Mo/ZnO/DFT/PrS/polymer & 1.30 & 5.76 & 68.1 & 5.25 & 2015 & [81] \\  & -difference/Mo/Ag & 1.27 & 10.36 & 63.0 & 8.27 & 2017 & [82] \\  & ITO/ZnO/PrS/WC/Mo/Au/Al/ZO/PtS/ & 1.31 & 12.50 & 56.7 & 9.4 & 2018 & [85] \\  & ITO/ZnO/PrS/EDD/PrS/W/Al/ZO/PTS/Th:IEICO & 1.36 & 13.63 & 69.0 & 12.82 & 2020 & [86] \\  & -4f/MoO/Ag & & & & & & \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: HSC solar cell devices with all kinds of device configurations. Device type: **(A)** Hybrid bulk heterojunction solar cells with semiconductor NCs as acceptors. **(B)** Hybrid solar cells with more active layers. **(C)** Hybrid solar cells using organic materials as hole transfer layers. **(D)** Hybrid solar cells with tandem structures. **Author Contributions:** [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] searched and classified the literature; [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. **Funding:** This research received no external funding. **Acknowledgments:** This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21875075, 61774077, 61274062, 61775061), Guangdong Natural Science Fund (No. 2018A0303130041, No. 2018A0303130211), Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 201804010295), National Undergraduate Innovative and Enterpreuential Training Program (No. 201910561011), the Key Projects of the Joint Fund of Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund of Guangdong Province (2019B1515120073) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities for financial support. **Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.