## 4 Discussion  
This study aimed to analyze the gaze behavior and shooting accuracy in different shooting positions and distances under the interference of environmental constraints of simulated opposition and gym audience noise. The hypothesis that differences exist when shooting at a greater distance was confirmed. All shooting conditions showed that the shooting distance had an important role in the duration time of fixation. Shooting distance played an important role in how long the fixation lasts. When the athlete was closer to the basket, in the case of the free throw, the fixation time values and the number of fixations were greater when compared to the \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Dependent Variable**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Independent Variables**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Wilcoxon Test**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Magnitude**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Shooting Conditions**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Positions**} & _Value_ & \(p\) & \(d\) & **[Qualitative]** \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Fixation number} & \multirow{8}{*}{B} & 1–3 & \(-\)4.437 & 0.000 & 0.434 & (small) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–3 & \(-\)0.142 & 0.887 & 0.047 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)1.394 & 0.163 & 0.071 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)2.276 & 0.023 & 0.120 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 1–3 & \(-\)5.316 & 0.000 & 0.588 & (medium) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–3 & \(-\)1.504 & 0.132 & 0.138 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)0.549 & 0.583 & 0.115 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)0.962 & 0.336 & 0.024 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–3 & \(-\)1.219 & 0.223 & 0.105 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)0.356 & 0.722 & 0.000 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)0.123 & 0.722 & 0.101 & (trivial) \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{B} & \multirow{8}{*}{B} & 1–3 & \(-\)4.702 & 0.000 & 0.426 & (small) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–3 & \(-\)2.290 & 0.022 & 0.116 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)1.421 & 0.155 & 0.058 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)0.160 & 0.873 & 0.060 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 1–3 & \(-\)6.288 & 0.000 & 0.590 & (medium) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–3 & \(-\)0.839 & 0.402 & 0.086 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)0.587 & 0.557 & 0.111 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)1.856 & 0.064 & 0.206 & (small) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–3 & \(-\)1.181 & 0.237 & 0.027 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)0.368 & 0.713 & 0.056 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)0.319 & 0.750 & 0.093 & (trivial) \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Accuracy} & \multirow{8}{*}{B} & 1–3 & \(-\)2.920 & 0.004 & 0.316 & (small) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–3 & \(-\)2.305 & 0.021 & 0.240 & (small) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)0.355 & 0.723 & 0.043 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)2.485 & 0.013 & 0.196 & (small) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 1–3 & \(-\)3.404 & 0.001 & 0.348 & (small) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–3 & \(-\)0.055 & 0.956 & 0.007 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)2.193 & 0.028 & 0.192 & (small) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)2.073 & 0.038 & 0.198 & (small) \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{O} & \multirow{8}{*}{N} & 2–3 & \(-\)1.516 & 0.130 & 0.154 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 2–4 & \(-\)1.306 & 0.192 & 0.109 & (trivial) \\ \cline{3-7}  & & 3–4 & \(-\)0.341 & 0.733 & 0.042 & (trivial) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Legend: B—baseline; N—simulated gym audience noise; O—opposition.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: Results of the Wilcoxon test and effect sizes [41] for all variables with statistical significance (number of fixations and total time of fixations) for the sample (n = 18). three-point shot. These results were in accordance, in terms of visual information, with the work of [PERSON] et al. [18], who affirmed that visual sensory information has a very important role in basketball shots. [PERSON] et al.