## 3 Results
### Analysis of Successful Patterns on Offense  
Table 3 displays the results of the T-Pattern analysis conducted on the 167 successful offensive actions identified. In relation to game location, a greater percentage of successful plays was recorded for home teams (54.5%) compared to away teams (44.5%).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Sequence of Patterns**} & **Max** & **Most Representative T-Pattern** & **O** & **\%R** & **\%T** \\ \hline HOME & & 91 & ((home (on-ball screen 16–9 s of possession))((shoot after on-ball screen 2-point basket)(central mid-range zone guard))) yes & 3 & 3.3 & 1.8 \\  & & & ((home 2 passes used)(no screen catch and shoot))(3-point basket (guard yes))) & 3 & 3.3 & 1.8 \\ HOME & WIN & 32 & ((home ((twinning 0 passes used)(no screen foul)))((2 free throws backcourt)(guard yes))) & 3 & 9.4 & 1.8 \\ HOME & WIN & 24–17 & 4 & ((home ((winning no screen)(24–17 s of possession foul)))(2 free throws (guard yes))) & 3 & 75 & 1.8 \\ HOME & WIN & 16–9 & 10 & (home (winning ((no screen 16–9 s of possession)(catch and shoot yes)))) & 3 & 30 & 1.8 \\ HOME & WIN & 8–0 & 18 & (home ((winning (2 passes used 8–0 s of possession)(layup yes)))) & 3 & 16.7 & 1.8 \\ \hline HOME & LOS & & 25 & ((home ((losing on-ball screen)(shoot after on-ball screen 2-point basket)))(central mid-range zone (guard yes))) & 3 & 12 & 1.8 \\  & & & ((home ((losing each and shoot)(2-point basket center))) yes) & 4 & 16 & 2.4 \\  & & & ((home ((losing no screen)(16–9 s of possession 2-point basket basket (long ((1 pass used 16–9 s of possession)(2-point basket yes)))))) & 3 & 33.3 & 1.8 \\ HOME & LOS & 8–0 & 16 & ((home ((losing on-ball screen)(16–9 s of possession guard))) yes) & 3 & 33.3 & 1.8 \\  & & & (((home losing)(8–0 s of possession catch and shoot))(3-point basket guard)) yes) & 3 & 18.8 & 1.8 \\ HOME & LOS & 8–0 & 16 & ((home ((losing 8–0 s of possession)(catch and shoot 2-point basket basket)))(center yes)) & 3 & 18.8 & 1.8 \\ \hline HOME & TIE & & 34 & (((home tying)(0 passes used no screen))(layup 2-point basket (forward yes))) & 3 & 8.1 & 1.8 \\  & & & (home ((tying (on-ball screen shoot after on-ball screen))(2-point basket(guard yes))) & 3 & 8.1 & 1.8 \\  & & & ((home tying)(no screen (24–17 s of possession 2-point basket(forward yes)))) & 3 & 50 & 1.8 \\  & & & (home (tying ((no screen 24–17 s of possession)(left interior zone yes)))) & 4 & 66.7 & 2.4 \\ HOME & TIE & 16–9 & 13 & ((home ((tying 2 passes used)(16–9 s of possession 2-point basket)))(central mid-range zone (guard yes))) & 3 & 23.1 & 1.8 \\  & & & ((home (tying 16–9 s of possession)(layup 2-point basket)(guard yes))) & 3 & 23.1 & 1.8 \\  & & & ((home (tying 4 passes used))(8–0 s of possession central mid-range zone)) yes) & 3 & 23.1 & 1.8 \\ HOME & TIE & 8–0 & 15 & ((home (tying ((off-ball screen 8–0 s of possession)(forward yes)))) & 3 & 20 & 1.8 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 3: T-Pattern analysis of the 167 successful moves observed.  
Regarding the score situation at the start of each possession, home teams achieved their highest success rate when the game was tied (37.4%), followed by situations when they were ahead (35.2%), and finally when trailing (27.4%). In contrast, visiting teams recorded the majority of their successful actions when starting behind on the scoreboard (69.7%), with lower success rates when leading (18.4%) or tied (11.9%).  
Additionally, the analysis showed that, regardless of whether the team was playing at home or away, or the result at the beginning of the possession, the majority of successful actions were executed in the final segment of the possession (8\"-0\").  
The main offensive patterns identified are detailed below, categorized according to game location, initial team result, and remaining possession time.