## 5 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Parameter** & **B-1** & **B-2** & **B-3** & **B-4** & **B-5** \\ \hline Pole & South & South & South & South & South \\ Crater approximated diameter [km] & 7.777 & 8.413 & 5.393 & 7.898 & 5.211 \\ Size of the permanently shaded area [km\({}^{2}\)] & 8.135 & 23.659 & 7.888 & 8.090 & 6.959 \\ Crater depth [m] & 1100 & 1400 & 1000 & 800 & 1000 \\ Maximum crater slope [\({}^{\circ}\)] & 25 & 26 & 33 & 28 & 30 \\ Maximum crater slope along the selected rover’s route [\({}^{\circ}\)] & 22 & 13 & 25 & 20 & 24 \\ Length of the descent route to the micro trap [km] & 1.615 & 4.030 & 1.852 \({}^{\ast}\) & 2.690 & 2.373 \\ Length of the exit route to the micro trap [km] & 2.221 & 4.030 & 3.126 \({}^{\ast}\) & 2.690 & 5.717 \\ Crater latitude (LAT) & \(-\)88.20990 & \(-\)79.29052 & \(-\)78.262058 & \(-\)08.31803 & \(-\)89.12808 \\ Crater longitude (LON) & 305.92639 & 69.71826 & 272.85840 & 290.27836 & 273.21226 \\ Amount of water [wt\%] & 0.2 & 0.1 & 0.2-0.3 & 0-0.1 & 0.3 \\ CO\({}_{2}\) amount [log10 kg/m\({}^{2}\)/Gyr] & 14-21 & - & - & 14-21 & 10-20 \\ Crater distance [km] & 24.455 & 26.859 & 16.802 & 17.353 & 16.380 \\ Crater area [km\({}^{2}\)] & 47.073 & 57.017 & 22.266 & 23.609 & 21.227 \\ Global minimum temperature [K] & - & 50–60 & 55–60 & 55–65 & - \\ Global maximum temperature [K] & - & 230–245 & 230–240 & 240–250 & - \\ Average summer temperature [K] & 70–170 & - & - & - & - \\ Average winter temperature [K] & 60–150 & - & - & - & - \\ Minimum summer temperature [K] & - & - & - & - & 40–70 \\ Maximum summer temperature [K] & - & - & - & - & 100-300 \\ Minimum temperature in winter [K] & - & - & - & - & 30–60 \\ Maximum temperature in winter [K] & - & - & - & - & 50–270 \\ Surface temperature at night & - & - & - & - & - \\ Iron deposits [wt\%] & 6 & 6 & 6 & 6 & 5–7 \\ Thorium deposits [ppm] & 2 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0–2 \\ Titanium deposits [wt\%] & none & 0.5 & \textless{1} & 0–1.5 & none \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \({}^{\ast}\) To/From crater floor in the area of PSR.  
\end{table} 
Table 1: Cold microtrap parameters. which are unlikely in the light of the current state knowledge. The conversion factor used in the calculations was 1 ppm = 0.0001%. If a range of concentration values was given for a deposit in Table 1, the lowest non-zero value was taken into account in the calculations. The concentration values of individual raw materials finally adopted for the calculations are presented in Table 2. Tables 3-5 present the estimated deposit sizes in metric tons for the pessimistic, normal, and optimistic scenarios, respectively. With the data from Tables 3-5, it is possible to estimate the value of deposits for the three presented variants. For this purpose, information on the price of individual raw materials is needed. The price of iron was assumed to be the iron ore price from September 2023, which is 0.1218 $/kg. The price of contaminated titanium from September 2023 was assumed to be 6.25 $/kg as the titanium price. In turn, the track price was assumed to be 30 $/kg. In all three cases, this is the price of low-quality raw material that is not processed. If a metallurgical process were carried out on the Moon and pure iron and titanium were obtained, as well as pure, highly enriched thorium, the price of raw materials obtained from the deposits would be much higher. However, the value of the unprocessed deposit is estimated, and it was decided to use conservative assumptions for the calculations. However, it is difficult to determine the price for water and CO\({}_{2}\) extracted on the Moon, because markets for these raw materials do not yet exist. In the case of lunar water,