\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Country**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Selected Food/food Groups Analyed**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Population Groups**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Ditary Exposure of BPA/Mg byDW/psy**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Reference**} \\ \cline{3-3} \cline{5-6}  & & & & **Mean \(\pm\) 54 \({}^{\ast}\)** & **Range (Min-Max)** \\ \hline Belgium & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Camed beverages and foods} & Adults & 0.015 & - & [13] \\ \hline Canada (Quebec city) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Dairy, most, fish, scop, broad and coral, vegetable, fruit, beverages, baby} & Infants & 0.17-0.33 & \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Load and fast food} & Children (1–9 years) & - & 0.082-0.23 & [14] \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{food and fast food} & Adults & 0.052-0.081 & \\ \hline China & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Causal products, meat and meat products, fish and seafood, dairy} & Adult men & 0.484 & - & [15] \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{products, bean products, vegetables, snacks, and beverages} & Adult women & 0.094 & - & [15] \\ \hline France & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Bread and cereals, dairy and egg products, meat, poultry and game, fish} & Infants & 0.12-0.14 & \multirow{4}{*}{[4]} \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{and seafood, fruits and vegetables, beverages, and fast foods} & Adults & 0.058-0.06 & \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Programal women} & 0.058-0.06 & \\ \hline France & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Chidren and adolescents} & 0.048-0.050 & \multirow{4}{*}{[4]} \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{non-cramed foods from animal origin} & Adults & 0.034-0.035 & \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Programal women} & 0.007-0.049 & \\ \hline Korea & Vegetables, fruits, fish, meat, us, and coffee (canned) & Adults & 1.509 & - & [7] \\ \hline New Zealand & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Fruits and vegetables, fish, spap and sano, cancer meat, spaghetti and} & Adult (0.06) & 0.078 & \multirow{4}{*}{-} & [9] \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{based person, infant foods, and beverages} & Adult (0.5 kg) & 0.053 & - & [9] \\ \hline Spain (Southern) & Fish, meat, vegetables, pulses, and soft drinks (canned and microwave containers) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Programal women} & 1.1 \(\pm\) 0.84 & - & [18] \\ \hline Sweden & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Causal products, fish, dairy and products, fruits and vegetables,} & Adults (17-70 years) & - & 0.04-0.07 & [19] \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Indders} & 0.243 & \multirow{4}{*}{-} \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Indders} & 0.142 & \multirow{4}{*}{-} & \multirow{4}{*}{[20]} \\ United states & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Solid foods, oil, beverages, and dairy products} & Children & 0.117 & - & [20] \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Temengers} & 0.0636 & \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Adults} & 0.0586 & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} BPA: Weighted A, \({}^{\ast}\)Sc: Standard deviation.  
\end{table} 
Table 1: Estimated daily exposure of BPA from commonly consumed foods. In a more a recent study, [PERSON] et al. measured BPA levels in foodstuffs collected from the French market between 2007 and 2009 ([PERSON] et al., 2009). The authors reported lower values than those outlined above of 51.3, 43.6 and 35.6 \(\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro g}\)/ kg as against values reported by [PERSON] et al. of 395, 68.9 and 98.0 \(\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro g}\)/kg in liver, roast pork and steamed salmon, respectively ([PERSON] et al., 2010). One plausible reason for this difference may be the variation in sample preparation and the sensitivity of analytical technique used. While [PERSON] et al. analysed the collected samples individually in the raw state, [PERSON] et al. used composite samples made from 15 subsamples and analysed after culinary preparation ([PERSON] et al., 2009; [PERSON] et al., 2009). Differences in the level of BPA exposure for different demographic groups such as pregnant women or children have also been reported.