## 3 Results
### Agility Tests
The average total distance covered in the FT was 2373.15 \(\pm\) 104.79 m, the values being homogeneous (CV = 4.42%) with notable asymmetry (\(\beta=0.23\)). We can see an increase in the total distance covered by the experimental group of 7.78%, which is statistically significant (\(p<0.0005\)). For HSR, the total distance covered in this speed range (19.2-25.2 km/h) during the first monitorized training session was 146.60 \(\pm\) 29.33 m; here, the values are non-homogeneous (CV = 20.00%) and the asymmetry is notable (\(\beta=0.21\)). In the last monitored training session, the distance travelled in the HSR range was 191.90 \(\pm\) 37.14 m; the values are non-homogeneous (CV = 19.36%) and the asymmetry is notable \(\beta=-0.10\)). By analyzing the results, we note a statistically significant increase in the total distance covered in the VHSR speed range of 30.90% (\(p<0.0005\)). During the first SSG training procedure, the subjects of the experimental group covered in the VHSR speed range a total distance of 4.25 \(\pm\) 6.81 m; the values are not homogeneous (CV = 160.12%) and the asymmetry is pronounced (\(\beta=0.63\)). During the last monitorized training they covered an average of 5.25 \(\pm\) 5.96 m; these values are also non-homogeneous (CV = 113.60%) and have notable asymmetry (\(\beta=0.46\)). Between the first monitored SSG \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l l l l} \hline \hline
**Group** & **Variable** & **Testing** & **N** & **M \(\pm\) SD** & \
\begin{tabular}{l} **CV** \\ **(\%)** \\ \end{tabular} & **Median** &
\begin{tabular}{l} **Asymmetry** \\ **Coefficient (\(\beta\))** \\ \end{tabular} & **\(t\)** & **\(p\)** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Experiment} & Illinois Agility & Initial & 20 & 15.72 \(\pm\) 0.36 & 2.27 & 15.81 & \(-\)0.23 & \multirow{4}{*}{9.905} & \multirow{4}{*}{\(<\)0.0005} \\  & Test (s) & Final & 20 & 15.04 \(\pm\) 0.18 & 1.18 & 15.04 & \(-\)0.03 & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-10}  & Short Dribbling & Initial & 20 & 11.87 \(\pm\) 0.47 & 3.94 & 11.86 & 0.02 & \multirow{4}{*}{9.847} & \multirow{4}{*}{\(<\)0.0005} \\  & Test (s) & Final & 20 & 11.30 \(\pm\) 0.55 & 4.84 & 11.35 & \(-\)0.10 & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Control} & Illinois Agility & Initial & 20 & 15.71 \(\pm\) 0.41 & 2.59 & 15.90 & \(-\)0.46 & \multirow{4}{*}{2.201} & \multirow{4}{*}{\(<\)0.025} \\  & Test (s) & Final & 20 & 15.67 \(\pm\) 0.43 & 2.75 & 15.81 & \(-\)0.32 & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-10}  & Short Dribbling & Initial & 20 & 11.89 \(\pm\) 0.51 & 4.25 & 11.93 & \(-\)0.09 & \multirow{4}{*}{1.059} & \multirow{4}{*}{\(>\)0.05} \\ \cline{1-1}  & Test (s) & Final & 20 & 11.88 \(\pm\) 0.51 & 4.29 & 11.95 & \(-\)0.15 & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* N—number, CV—coefficient of variability, M—mean, SD—standard deviation, \(t\)—Student T-dependent test, \(p\leftarrow\)–statistically significant, and \(p\succeq\)—statistically insignificant.  
\end{table} 
Table 3: Statistical description of the agility tests (Illinois agility test and short dribbling test) in the experiment and control group. training procedure and the last training procedure, there was an increase in the distance travelled at speeds above 25.2 km/h, but this was statistically insignificant (\(p>0.05\)).