## 5 Discussion  
The process of building DT for a physical asset assumes the existence of a corresponding configurable and reusable digital template with a rich collection of tunable attributes, enabling its ad libitum convergence to the desired twin. An attempt to apply the same methodology while creating a digital twin of an organizational system (DTOS) fails because of the unavailability of a universal digital templates that overcome the underlining uniqueness and the emergent nature of individual organizational systems. This research article's motivation emerges from two main foundations:  
* results of the comparative analysis of the contemporary research publications addressing digital twinning templates existing in general sociotechnical systems (STSs) and the particular higher education context representations (elaborated on in the Sections 1 and 2);
* practical experiences gained throughout model-based enterprise information systems engineering and reengineering in different domains (business, banking, healthcare, government, education, and national accreditation agency), partially elaborated upon in our previous publication [38] (pp. 25-27). To mitigate the inherent STSDT complexity, this research article proposes one general (RH1), one universal (RH2), and one domain-specific (RH3) research hypothesis, establishing the framework of the proposed meta-model hyper-document supporting the STS context digital twin representation. By abstracting the practical meta-modeling examples in different domains and contemporary pinpointed research challenges concerning the contemporary STS theoretical foundation and digital twinning methodology application in digital transformation of complex STSs, we first established a multilayer research methodology framework compliant with the MOF architecture model (Figure 1). Secondly, the proposed observer-based object model, extending the adopted ontology model (Figure 2), frames the behavioral aspects of complex sociotechnical system-of-systems (STSoS) with the explicit conceptual segregation of the context STSoS, corresponding to all related individual STSs excluding one under the consideration, as well as the particular addressed STSoS (Figure 3). Figure 16: The LegislationContextMetaModel, Table A8, Appendix H, systematizes the roles and relations of the individual meta-concepts building the LegislationContextMetaModel. The primary mission of this research article follows the dominating claims that the sociotechnical system's context represents a virtual-twin hyper-document large data object enabling the verification and validation of different domain-specific processes in life-long assessment and data-driven constant upgrading while fulfilling the stated mission, wherein we have proposed multilayered meta-concept-based templates with high reusable potentials to fill the apparent gap in digital twinning of STSs. The detailed elaboration of the proposed hyper-document content appears in the Section 3 of this article. To cope with the complexity of the proposed meta-models, in compliance with the research hypothesis RH2, we introduced five novel universal, domain-independent meta-concepts encapsulating the core features used to build other meta-concepts over the inheritance mechanism (StructuredConcept, GenericTechnologyConcept, AssessedConcept, RankedConcept, and GenericPerformer) (see Section 3.2). Consequently, the secondary mission of this research article is to pinpoint higher education external context influencers throughout a comprehensive novel higher education external context meta-models. We focused on higher education due to its domain-related diversity. On the other hand, it is apparent that a complex higher education system-of-systems mission highly outweighs a simple knowledge transfer. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social order, transmitting values, promoting social mobility, and fostering societal change [39]. The higher education system symbiotically interacts with the higher education external context and evolves within it.