## 3 Results  
A comparison of the acute effects of one training session between the SG and the HG was performed using an rANOVA, which showed significant time \(\times\) intervention interaction effects for the following variables: CMJ (F = 4.68, \(p\) = 0.038); LA (F = 11.0, \(p\) = 0.003); and session RPE (F = 20.0, \(p\) < 0.001). The results are presented in Table 2.  
A post-hoc pairwise comparison analysis revealed that the SG performed better in the CMJ after the training session compared to their jumping height before (MD [95% CL] = 0.16-6.01 [31.0-45.1] cm, p Tukey; <0.001). Following the training session, the SG showed a substantial elevation in LA, accompanied by a statistically significant distinction when compared with the post-session LA values in the HG (MD [95% CL] = 0.16-2.64 [0.69-4.31] mmol/L, p Tukey; <0.001-0.005). In terms of session RPE, the rating numbers of both the SG and HG increased after the session, with significantly higher ratings for the SG compared to the HG (MD [95% CL] = 0.19-6.31 [1.17-8.52] RPE, p Tukey; <0.001). No differences were found in HR. The analysis of longitudinal training effects on jumping and sprint performance parameters among the SG, HG, and CG was conducted using an rANOVA, which revealed no group differences pre-intervention, but significant time \(\times\) intervention interaction effects for the following variables: CMJ (F = 14.90, \(p\) < 0.001); PSJT (F = 8.09, \(p\) = 0.002); 10 mT (F = 4.18, \(p\) = 0.051); and 20 mT (F = 8.49, \(p\) = 0.002). A post-hoc pairwise comparison analysis revealed that only the SG improved significantly throughout the intervention period in CMJ (MD [95% CL] = 0.03-4.88 [39.3; 49.0] cm, p [PERSON]; <0.001); PSJT (MD [95% CL] = 0.29-5.14 [50.3; 63.6] cm, p Tukey; <0.001); 10 mT ST (MD [95% CL] = 0.00-0.13 [1.70; 1.91] s, p Tukey; 0.018-0.032); and 20 mT (MD [95% CL] = 0.01-0.91 [2.86; 3.22] s, p Tukey; <0.001-0.050) performance. Moreover, the analysis of magnitude-based inferences showed that assuming a small effect, the changes in CMJ performance were highly likely beneficial for both the SG and the HG. This was also true for PSJT, CH, 5 mT, 10 mT, and 20 mT performance, but only in the SG. Concerning RSI performance, the analysis showed that the change was likely beneficial for the HG. Statistical values for jump and speed performances are shown in Table 3, and the individual values of and the percentage changes in the RSI, CMJ, and 10 mT are presented as examples in Figure 1.  
To analyze the longitudinal training effects of the intervention on the parameters of CoD performance among the SG, HG, and CG, an rANOVA was performed. The analysis revealed no group differences pre-intervention but significant time \(\times\) intervention interaction effects for the following variables: TT (F = 5.70, \(p\) = 0.010); Avg Vel 1a (average velocity from start to CoD) (F = 8.40, \(p\) = 0.002); and Avg Vel 1b (average velocity after CoD) (F = 3.89, \(p\) = 0.036). A post-hoc pairwise comparison analysis revealed improvements throughout the intervention in TT in both the SG and HG (MD [95% CL] = 0.01-0.20 [2.79; 3.20] s, p Tukey; 0.019-0.042). Moreover, an increase in Avg Vel 1a was observed for the HG (MD [95% CL] = 0.01-0.21 [2.75; 3.22] m/s, p Tukey; 0.016), whereas the SG improved in Avg Vel 1b and also exhibited a difference between the SG and CG post-intervention