## 3 Experiment Details
### Full-Scale Specim Section Set Results  
#### 3.3.1 Record of Displacements and Loads  
The results obtained from the full-scale test are presented in this section. Table 4 summarizes the most relevant information related to the history of the displacements and loads corresponding to the ones deduced on the development of the test, where the displacements correspond to the control displacement, that means to the center of the highest extreme of Wall 1 and the loads on the total external force practiced by the eight hydraulic jack system.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline
**Load** & \(\delta_{\text{all}}\) & \(\Delta_{\text{all}}\) & \(\Delta_{\text{all}}\) & \(\mathbf{P_{\text{all}}}\) & \(\Delta_{\text{i}}\) & \(\mathbf{P_{\text{i}}}\) & **Notes** \\
**Cycle** & **(mm)** & **(mm)** & **(mm)** & **(kg)** & **(mm)** & **(kg)** & **Notes** \\ \hline
1 & 1.0 & 1.0 & - & - & 1.2 & 75.7 & \\
2 & 1.0 & 1.0 & -0.1 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 74.9 & \\
3 & 2.0 & 2.0 & -0.1 & 0.9 & 1.9 & 99.5 & \\
4 & 2.0 & 2.0 & 0.2 & 0.2 & 3.1 & 129.3 & \\
5 & 4.0 & 4.0 & 0.9 & 1.9 & 3.9 & 152.3 & \\
6 & 4.0 & 5.5 & 1.1 & -5.9 & 5.4 & 188.2 & \\
7 & 6.0 & 7.2 & 1.2 & 2.5 & 7.4 & 240.8 & \\
8 & 6.0 & 7.9 & 1.9 & 7.4 & 7.7 & 247.0 & \\
9 & 8.0 & 9.9 & 1.9 & 5.9 & 8.3 & 295.0 & Retired CDP 10 \\
10 & 8.0 & 11.0 & 2.9 & 25.5 & 11.2 & 329.0 & Dimensions with CDP 25 \\
11 & 10.0 & 13.3 & 3.2 & 23.2 & 13.3 & 367.9 & \\
12 & 10.0 & 14.0 & 3.9 & 6.2 & 14.1 & 390.3 & \\
13 & 20.0 & 20.0 & 4.4 & 5.2 & 20.4 & 533.0 & \\
14 & 20.0 & 20.0 & 6.8 & 8.8 & 19.9 & 505.9 & \\
15 & 25.0 & 25.0 & 7.0 & 0.1 & 23.4 & 609.3 & Retired CDP 25 \\
16 & 25.0 & 25.0 & 8.8 & 16.3 & 24.8 & 908.0 & Dimensions with CDP 200 \\
17 & 30.0 & 30.0 & 9.1 & 30.1 & 30.1 & 1054.7 & \\
18 & 30.0 & 30.0 & 11.3 & 31.6 & 2.9 & 1037.9 & \\
19 & 40.0 & 40.0 & 9.4 & 41.8 & 39.3 & 1361.2 & \\
20 & 40.0 & 40.0 & 15.4 & 22.4 & 40.1 & 1292.4 & \\
21 & 50.0 & 50.0 & 16.5 & 27.5 & 50.1 & 1592.8 & \\
22 & 50.0 & 50.0 & 19.9 & 0.0 & 50.0 & 1502.5 & \\
23 & 60.0 & 60.0 & 21.7 & 29.0 & 55.0 & 1660.1 & Sheathing failure \\ \hline \end{tabular} where: \(\delta_{\text{all}}\): rise of the nominal displacement proposed for the current load cycle. \(\Delta_{\text{all}}\): nominal displacement proposed for the current load cycle. \(\Delta_{\text{all}}\): permanent deformation on the precedent load cycle anterior, and built on the initial deformation of the current load cycle. \(\mathbf{P_{\text{all}}}\): load corresponding to \(\Delta_{\text{all}}\). \(\Delta_{\text{i}}\): deformation corresponding to the end of the load face of the current cycle. \(\mathbf{P_{\text{all}}}\): load corresponding to \(\Delta_{\text{i}}\).  
\end{table}
Table 4: Record of the shifting and loads on the experiment development.  
Figure 15: Hydraulic pump, hoses and pressure cells.  
From the 6 th to the 12 th cycle, the nominal displacements proposed were oscillating around the target of 9.0 mm calculated. At the end, 22 complete cycles were realized, arriving to impose displacements of nearly 5.0 cm with loads higher than 1500 kg, and the failure of the model appeared on the load phase corresponding to the 23 th cycle, with a displacement of nearly 5.5 cm and a load of 1660 kg approximatively.