## 3 Results and Discussion
### Effect of SA Seed Priming on Antioxidants Activities
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Variables** & **TPC** & **TFC** & **TAC** & **DPPH** & \(\beta\)**-Carotene** & **FRAP** \\ \hline Kalbia & & & & & & \\ \hline TPC (mg GAE/g DW) & 1 & 0.96 & 0.83 & \(-\)0.86 & \(-\)0.76 & \(-\)0.01 \\ TFC (mg GAE/g DW) & 0.96 & 1 & 0.92 & \(-\)0.94 & \(-\)0.83 & \(-\)0.16 \\ TAC (mg GAE/g DW) & 0.83 & 0.92 & 1 & \(-\)0.99 & \(-\)0.95 & \(-\)0.51 \\ DPPH (IC\({}_{50}\) mg/mL) & \(-\)0.86 & \(-\)0.94 & \(-\)0.99 & 1 & 0.94 & 0.46 \\ \(\beta\)-carotene (IC\({}_{50}\) mg/mL) & \(-\)0.76 & \(-\)0.83 & \(-\)0.95 & 0.94 & 1 & 0.6478 \\ FRAP (EC\({}_{50}\) mg/mL) & \(-\)0.01 & \(-\)0.16 & \(-\)0.51 & 0.46 & 0.64 & 1 \\ CGA\({}_{\text{isom1}}\) (mg/gDW) & 0.95 & 0.85 & 0.71 & \(-\)0.75 & \(-\)0.72 & 0.01 \\ CGA\({}_{\text{isom2}}\) mg/gDW) & 0.92 & 0.82 & 0.69 & \(-\)0.73 & \(-\)0.73 & \(-\)0.02 \\ CGA\({}_{\text{isom3}}\) mg/gDW) & 0.94 & 0.85 & 0.73 & \(-\)0.77 & \(-\)0.76 & \(-\)0.05 \\ CGA\({}_{\text{isom4}}\) mg/gDW) & 0.97 & 0.91 & 0.70 & \(-\)0.75 & \(-\)0.62 & 0.19 \\ CQA\({}_{\text{isom1}}\) mg/gDW) & 0.80 & 0.89 & 0.99 & \(-\)0.99 & \(-\)0.97 & \(-\)0.58 \\ CQA\({}_{\text{isom2}}\) mg/gDW) & \(-\)0.32 & \(-\)0.16 & \(-\)0.20 & 0.21 & 0.45 & 0.27 \\ CA (mg/gDW) & 0.80 & 0.64 & 0.33 & \(-\)0.3968 & \(-\)0.26 & 0.54 \\ R (mg/gDW) & 0.78 & 0.6107 & 0.44 & \(-\)0.4927 & \(-\)0.54 & 0.11 \\ EpiC (mg/gDW) & 0.72 & 0.5883 & 0.53 & \(-\)0.5658 & \(-\)0.68 & \(-\)0.18 \\ LutR (mg/gDW) & 0.69 & 0.5485 & 0.49 & \(-\)0.5225 & \(-\)0.65 & \(-\)0.16 \\ \hline \hline Sidi Khlif & & & & & & \\ \hline TPC (mg GAE/g DW) & 1 & 0.94 & 0.99 & \(-\)0.76 & \(-\)0.91 & \(-\)0.88 \\ TFC (mg GAE/g DW) & 0.94 & 1 & 0.96 & \(-\)0.80 & \(-\)0.96 & \(-\)0.97 \\ TAC (mg GAE/g DW) & 0.99 & 0.96 & 1 & \(-\)0.82 & \(-\)0.95 & \(-\)0.89 \\ DPPH (IC\({}_{50}\) mg/mL) & \(-\)0.76 & \(-\)0.80 & \(-\)0.82 & 1 & 0.94 & 0.66 \\ g-carotene (IC\({}_{50}\) mg/mL) & \(-\)0.91 & \(-\)0.96 & \(-\)0.95 & 0.94 & 1 & 0.87 \\ FRAP (EC\({}_{50}\) mg/mL) & \(-\)0.88 & \(-\)0.97 & \(-\)0.89 & 0.66 & 0.87 & 1 \\ CGA\({}_{\text{isom1}}\) (mg/gDW) & 0.96 & 0.82 & 0.94 & \(-\)0.71 & \(-\)0.82 & \(-\)0.73 \\ CGA\({}_{\text{isom2}}\) (mg/gDW) & 0.90 & 0.89 & 0.93 & \(-\)0.96 & \(-\)0.97 & \(-\)0.77 \\ CGA\({}_{\text{isom3}}\) (mg/gDW) & 0.90 & 0.89 & 0.93 & \(-\)0.96 & \(-\)0.97 & \(-\)0.77 \\ CGA\({}_{\text{isom4}}\) (mg/gDW) & 0.99 & 0.97 & 0.99 & \(-\)0.81 & \(-\)0.95 & \(-\)0.92 \\ CQA\({}_{\text{isom1}}\) (mg/gDW) & 0.92 & 0.82 & 0.88 & \(-\)0.46 & \(-\)0.70 & \(-\)0.83 \\ CQA\({}_{\text{isom2}}\) (mg/gDW) & 0.94 & 0.94 & 0.93 & \(-\)0.60 & \(-\)0.83 & \(-\)0.96 \\ CA (mg/gDW) & 0.90 & 0.70 & 0.85 & \(-\)0.55 & \(-\)0.68 & \(-\)0.62 \\ R (mg/gDW) & 0.85 & 0.73 & 0.86 & \(-\)0.87 & \(-\)0.84 & \(-\)0.56 \\ EpiC (mg/gDW) & 0.91 & 0.99 & 0.94 & \(-\)0.84 & \(-\)0.97 & \(-\)0.96 \\ LutR (mg/gDW) & 0.95 & 0.95 & 0.97 & \(-\)0.92 & \(-\)0.99 & \(-\)0.85 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Data represents Pearson Correlation Coefficient R; TPC—total flavonoid content; TAC—total antioxidant activity; DPPH—2.2-Diphenyl-1-pyridyl-raz radical scavenging activity; FRAP—FRAP reducing power potential; \(\beta\)-carotene—\(\beta\)-Carotene-linoleic acid assay. CA—caffeoyluronic acid; CO—Caffeoyluronic acid; isom—Isomer; EpiC—cpietachir; Lutz—Luteolin-O-rutines; R—rutin.  
\end{table} 
Table 7: Correlation coefficients between total and individual phenolic compound amounts and antioxidant activities. the existence of a catechol group on the B ring, which chelates redox-active metals and scavenges free radicals, specifically superoxide radical, singlet oxygen, and lipophilic alkyl peroxyl radical [47]. It is imperative to point out that the overall antioxidant capacity shown by complex extracts in these assays was probably influenced by the amount of additive, as well as synergistic and/or antagonistic impacts of the individual compounds.