## 6 Result
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline  & & **Pre** & **Post** & **t (\(p\))** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Time** \\ **F (\(p\))** \\ \end{tabular} & **LCI, UCI** &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Group \(\times\) Time** \\ **F (\(p\))** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{SCM} & CSG & 14.08 \(\pm\) 1.77 & 12.89 \(\pm\) 1.27 & 4.356 (0.001 *) & 43.74 (\(<\)0.001 *) & \(-\)1.399, \(-\)0.739 & 0.56 (0.460) \\  & F & CTG & 13.18 \(\pm\) 1.26 & 12.24 \(\pm\) 1.36 & 5.484 (0.000 *) & 0.593 & & 0.018 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{SCG} & CSG & 224.71 \(\pm\) 38.09 & 188.33 \(\pm\) 27.07 & 5.886 (0.001 *) & 85.13 (\(<\)0.001 *) & \(-\)40.891, \(-\)26.070 & 0.64 (0.431) \\  & & CTG & 233.52 \(\pm\) 26.24 & 202.94 \(\pm\) 22.53 & 8.039 (0.000 *) & 0.739 & & 0.021 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{D} & CSG & 1.26 \(\pm\) 0.22 & 1.16 \(\pm\) 0.18 & 3.880 (0.001 *) & 29.16 (\(<\)0.001 *) & 0.052, 0.006 & 1.00 (0.325) \\  & D & CTG & 1.22 \(\pm\) 0.12 & 1.15 \(\pm\) 0.16 & 3.890 (0.001 *) & 0.493 & & 0.032 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{UT} & CSG & 17.60 \(\pm\) 1.57 & 15.73 \(\pm\) 1.51 & 6.157 (0.000 *) & 58.18 (\(<\)0.001 *) & \(-\)1.933, \(-\)1.117 & 2.97 (0.095) \\  & F & CTG & 17.42 \(\pm\) 1.81 & 16.24 \(\pm\) 1.26 & 4.537 (0.000 *) & 0.660 & & 0.090 \\  & & \(\eta^{2}\) & & & 0.684 & & 0.017 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{D} & CSG & 1.06 \(\pm\) 0.11 & 0.90 \(\pm\) 0.08 & 5.787 (0.000 *) & 0.75.67 (\(<\)0.001 *) & \(-\)0.162, \(-\)0.100 & 2.25 (0.144) \\  & D & CTG & 1.08 \(\pm\) 0.11 & 0.97 \(\pm\) 0.13 & 7.616 (0.000 *) & 0.711 & & 0.077 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{D} & CSG & 1.06 \(\pm\) 0.11 & 0.90 \(\pm\) 0.08 & 5.787 (0.000 *) & 0.787 (\(<\)0.001 *) & \(-\)0.162, \(-\)0.100 & 2.25 (0.144) \\  & D & CTG & 1.08 \(\pm\) 0.11 & 0.97 \(\pm\) 0.13 & 7.616 (0.000 *) & 0.711 & & 0.077 \\  & & \(\eta^{2}\) & & & 0.711 & & 0.077 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Change in muscle mechanical properties in the two groups (unit: F: HZ S: N/m) (\(n\) = 32). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline  & & **Pre** & **Post** & **t (\(p\))** & **Time** & **LCI, UCI** & **Group \(\times\) Time** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{SCM} & CSG & 3.46 \(\pm\) 1.34 & 4.50 \(\pm\) 1.50 & \(-\)8.759 (0.000 *) & 119.57 (\(<\)0.001 *) & 0.757, 1.105 & 1.57 (0.222) \\  & CTG & 3.07 \(\pm\) 0.91 & 3.89 \(\pm\) 1.16 & \(-\)6.470 (0.000 *) & 0.799 & & 0.049 \\  & \(\eta^{2}\) & & & & 0.787 (0.000 *) & 0.787 (0.000 *) & 0.787 (0.000 *) \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{UT} & CSG & 7.86 \(\pm\) 2.84 & 11.42 \(\pm\) 3.75 & \(-\)8.769 (0.000 *) & 136.21 (\(<\)0.001 *) & 2.726, 3.242 & 11.50 (0.002 *) \\  & CTG & 7.47 \(\pm\) 2.35 & 9.43 \(\pm\) 2.68 & \(-\)8.081 (0.000 *) & 0.820 & & 0.277 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{\(\eta^{2}\)} & & & & 0.820 & & 0.277 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{\(\eta^{2}\)} & & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-8}  & & & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-8}  & & & & & & & \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Change in muscle PPT in the two groups (unit: lb/cm\({}^{2}\)) (\(n\) = 32). (Table 4). However, only the PPT in the UT muscle showed a significant group-by-time interaction (F = 11.50, \(p\) < 0.002, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.277) (Table 3). No participants dropped out during the study, and all participants fully complied with the prescribed exercise regimen.