## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Component** & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{EN}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{EX}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{AV}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{UV}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{ENAV}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{ENIN}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{EXAV}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{LVIN}\) & \(\hat{B}_{D,K}^{LVIN}\) & F (\%) \\  & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** & **(pts-5\({}^{-1}\))** \\ \hline
**OCR Condenser** & 2.89E-09 & 1.77E-09 & 1.12E-09 & 4.21E-10 & 2.47E-09 & 2.58E-10 & 1.51E-09 & 1.63E-10 & 9.54E-10 & 87.48 \\
**HIT Pump** & 6.75E-08 & 5.89E-08 & 8.62E-09 & 8.95E-09 & 5.86E-08 & 7.81E-09 & 5.11E-08 & 1.14E-09 & 9.74E-09 & 81.5 \\
**ORC Condenser** & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - \\
**ORC evaporator** & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 92.25 \\
**ORC Pump** & 2.43E-07 & 1.86E-07 & 5.69E-08 & 5.17E-08 & 1.91E-07 & 3.96E-08 & 1.46E-07 & 1.21E-08 & 4.48E-08 & 74.9 The advanced exergy destruction rate of each component in the GPP cycle is given in Figure 3. In all components, unavoidable exergy destruction had the highest share, so that in the best state of operation, there will be an exergy destruction of nearly 60%-90% in the system that cannot be corrected. The avoidable exergy destruction of the condenser was the highest between the components which meant that the reduction in the destruction by about 30% is possible. In the case of endogenous irreversibility, the replacement or re-design of the component is recommended. These results are consistent with the results obtained by [PERSON] and [PERSON] [2], [PERSON] et al. [53], [PERSON] and [PERSON] [59]. Figure 4 presents the results of the advanced analysis of exergy destruction \(\dot{E}_{D}\) for the SGPP cycle. In all components, unavoidable exergy destruction had the highest share so that in the best state, there will be an exergy destruction of nearly 60%-90% which is incorrigible. In the ranking of avoidable exergy destruction, the solar power plant (about 40%) was in the first place, the steam economizer (32%) was in the second place and the steam evaporator (28%) was in the third place, all of which were able to be improved. See Figure 5 for the results of the advanced exergy-economic analysis of \(\dot{\mathcal{C}}_{D}\) (GPP cycle). In all equipment, unavoidable exergy-economic destruction had the highest contribution, and in the best state of operation, there will be about 80%-90% exergy-economic destruction in the system that cannot be corrected. The evaporator and pump had the higher avoidable exergy destruction among components. It was possible to reduce about 17% to 18% of the exergy-economic destruction by modification. The most economical impact of the exogenous exergy destruction rates of equipment was about 26% for the ORC recuperate. This showed that the system components hadstrong relations. In addition, the economic impact of the avoidable exergy destruction rates was only 19% which meant that the improvement potential of the system was very low, [PERSON] and [PERSON] [24], [PERSON] et al. [43]. Figure 3: Advanced exergy destruction rate of each component in the standalone geothermal cycle (GPP). Figure 6 represents the results of the advanced exergo-economic destruction \(\dot{C}_{D}\) analysis for the SGPP cycle. Unavoidable exergo-economic destruction of all components was the highest, and in the best state, there will be about 63%-90% destruction in the system, which is incorrigible. Avoidable exergo-economic destruction of the economizer (about 38%), the solar power plant (35%) and the evaporator (31%) were at a higher level, respectively, which could be modified. The most economical impact of the exogenous exergy destruction rates of the equipment was about 35% for the solar field. This showed that the system components had strong relations.