## 3 Results
### Games Average Load  
GACC2 was 70.68 \(\pm\) 17.08, 65.45 \(\pm\) 10.03, 71.11 \(\pm\) 9.93 and 69.59 \(\pm\) 13.01 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 1.560, \(p\) = 0.216, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.115). GACC3 was 15.81 \(\pm\) 11.05, 14.67 \(\pm\) 9.13, 16.01 \(\pm\) 9.58 and 17.10 \(\pm\) 10.71 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 1.582, \(p\) = 0.211, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.116). GDEC2 was 60.69 \(\pm\) 11.22, 60.34 \(\pm\) 10.26, 67.68 \(\pm\) 10.30 and 66.26 \(\pm\) 16.15 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was a significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 2.917, \(p\) = 0.047, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.196) between MIC5 and MIC7 (\(p\) = 0.035) and between MIC6 and MIC7 (\(p\) = 0.002). GDEC3 was 24.51 \(\pm\) 13.37, 23.64 \(\pm\) 12.69, 26.40 \(\pm\) 12.72 and 26.37 \(\pm\) 14.04 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. The values for MIC7 and MIC9 were higher but without a significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 1.884, \(p\) = 0.150, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.136). The results are presented in Figure 5.  
GDIST was 10,122.54 \(\pm\) 887.14, 9754.76 \(\pm\) 795.48, 10,070.39 \(\pm\) 736.88 and 9799.97 \(\pm\) 863.37 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 1.282, \(p\) = 0.295, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.097). GDIS4 was 1375.27 \(\pm\) 336.47, 1345.81 \(\pm\) 314.09, 1247.22 \(\pm\) 328.97 and 1379.36 \(\pm\) 340.17 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 0.776, \(p\) = 0.515, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.061). GDIS5 was 485.28 \(\pm\) 244.88, 496.04 \(\pm\) 177.73, 472.37 \(\pm\) 155.74 and 532.35 \(\pm\) 179.27 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 0.821, \(p\) = 0.491, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.064). GDIS6 was 117.50 \(\pm\) 63.75, 137.58 \(\pm\) 82.72, 151.40 \(\pm\) 71.38 and 141.08 \(\pm\) 99.75 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 1.020, \(p\) = 0.393, \(\eta  
GSPEF was 40.37 \(\pm\) 16.65, 41.25 \(\pm\) 13.60, 47.58 \(\pm\) 13.72 and 47.65 \(\pm\) 15.98 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was a significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 8.049, \(p\) \(<\) 0.001, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.401) between MIC5 and MIC7 (\(p\) = 0.004), between MIC5 and MIC9 (\(p\) \(<\) 0.001), between MIC6 and MIC7 (\(p\) = 0.009) and between MIC6 and MIC9 (\(p\) = 0.009). GMPWEF was 185.13 \(\pm\) 66.50, 171.61 \(\pm\) 54.80, 184.71 \(\pm\) 60.67 and 180.65 \(\pm\) 73.66 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 2.414, \(p\) = 0.083, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.167). GMPW4 was 2025.59 \(\pm\) 304.48, 1948.76 \(\pm\) 310.94, 2035.74 \(\pm\) 277.08 and 1919.13 \(\pm\) 310.53 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 0.799, \(p\) = 0.503, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.062). GMPW5 was 1201.26 \(\pm\) 340.02, 1178.44 \(\pm\) 260.60, 1306.87 \(\pm\) 270.50 and 1220.52 \(\pm\) 312.99 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was a significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 3.095, \(p\) = 0.039, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.205) between MIC5 and MIC7 (\(p\) = 0.035) and between MIC6 and MIC7 (\(p\) = 0.001). GMPW6 was 296.27 \(\pm\) 108.33, 288.82 \(\pm\) 93.52, 324.09 \(\pm\) 99.44 and 312.40 \(\pm\) 109.48 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. There was no significant difference (F\({}_{(3,36)}\) = 1.779, \(p\) = 0.169, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.129). The results are presented in Figure 7.  
GSLEEP was 3.05 \(\pm\) 1.22, 2.96 \(\pm\) 0.73, 2.39 \(\pm\) 0.83 and 2.64 \(\pm\) 0.95 for MIC5, MIC6, MIC7 and MIC9, respectively. This parameter had lower values for MIC7 and MIC9 but without a significant difference (F\({}_{(3,51)}\) = 2.360, \(p\) = 0.082, \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.122).