## 1 Introduction  
Construction sites are complex and dynamic environments where practitioners process large amounts of information for decision-making [1]. Over the years, augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) have been explored to support this process. AR and MR are immersive technologies that enhance user perception by superimposing digital information onto the real world [2, 3]. While different standpoints exist regarding the definitions and devices associated with AR and MR [4], this research considers them as separate technologies,given their practical differences. This distinction aims to leverage their distinct immersive capabilities to support decision-making in construction scenarios. AR primarily overlays digital information [3], while MR not only overlays, but also integrates it into the real environment, enabling natural manipulation and real-time interaction between virtual and physical objects, thereby providing a more immersive experience [3; 5; 6]. AR/MR capabilities allow real-time access to project data and increase context awareness by presenting information directly in the user's field of view, improving perception and interpretation, ultimately supporting decision-making [7; 8; 9]. Diverse research and applications leveraged AR and MR in the construction domain. For instance, [PERSON] et al. [10] developed an MR solution that displays real-time data from site elements within a virtual building model to enhance occupational health and safety inspection. [PERSON] et al. [11] presented an AR mobile application that provides building information on the worksite to support construction monitoring. [PERSON] and [PERSON] [12] proposed a multi-user workflow and interface for MR environments to facilitate collaborative design and decision-making during assembly processes. While studies such as these have shown the potential of AR and MR solutions to facilitate decision-making, most efforts emphasized the technological development and application over the information design, that is, over what information to present and how to present and interact with it in AR/MR environments to effectively support decision-makers. Given the complexity and volume of information in construction, it is critical to consider information presentation as it impacts context awareness [13]. For instance, AR/MR interfaces with unclear or unnecessary content can cause practitioners to overlook key information, leading to misunderstandings about the situation [14]. In this regard, although AR/MR inherently enables context awareness, poor designs can diminish its effectiveness [14]. AR/MR solutions should allow users to easily interpret and interact with virtual content for better context awareness and decision-making [8; 15]. Previous research explored two key approaches for improving information presentation and user interaction in AR/MR to support decision-making: situation awareness and immersive analytics. Situation awareness (SA) aims to design user-centered systems by defining information requirements and its presentation to improve users' perception, comprehension, and projection of the future status of their environment, thereby enabling more informed decision-making [15]. For instance, [PERSON] and [PERSON] [16] identified the information requirements of facility managers to develop an AR mobile application that presents the necessary information to easily comprehend the current situation, reducing cognitive load and facilitating decision-making. Moreover, [PERSON] et al. [17] examined how different textual presentation styles in AR affect user's perception and comprehension, denoting the importance of designing information to support task performance. Likewise, [PERSON] and [PERSON] [13] reviewed the use of AR for SA, identifying key design features and guidelines for creating interfaces that support situation awareness in AR/MR environments. Immersive analytics (IA) leverages technologies, such as AR and MR, to enhance data understanding and information processing to support decision-making [2; 18].