## 3 Results and Discussion
### Disposal  
If the product reaches its end-of-life and none of the alternatives foreseen by the waste hierarchy are feasible, the EPR can become a problem for small- and medium-sized enterprises. Waste disposal is a cost that falls entirely on the manufacturer. Therefore, consortia have been established, generally voluntary and non-profit. In this way, free competition is guaranteed (guaranteed by Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), since the producer is allowed to divide the disposal costs with the other producers. These consortia are widespread internationally and are distinguished by the type of equipment or type of market served: From refrigerators to lamps and from computer equipment to small appliances. These collective systems can have direct proprietary treatment facilities, where WEEE belonging to its members can be channelled or operated as simple \"waste brokers\" using third-party facilities. Nevertheless, the continuous and growing worldwide development of electric and electronic devices is linked to an increased number of e-waste. Consequently, e-waste collection and disposal management are becoming critical. Therefore, novel e-waste management models are needed and researchers are paying great attention to such problem [56]. An example, limited to Italy among the main operational collective systems, is the APIRAEE consortium, established in September 2007. Additional examples include the CCR Consortium, which is actually active in many states of the European Community, and in the United States, the Remedia Consortium. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline _Component_ & **Material** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Carbon Footpind** \\ **(Values Rounded)** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Market Value** \\ **(Ideal)** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Market Value** \\ **(Feasible)** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline _Face material_ & PP & 3.50 kgCo\({}_{2}\)/kg & 1.4 \(\upmu\)/kg & 1.4 \(\upmu\)/kg \\  & Paper & 1.35 kgCo\({}_{2}\)/kg & 0.445 \(\upmu\)/kg & 0 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _Adhesive_ & Acrylate & 3.34 kgCO\({}_{2}\)/kg & 2.5 \(\upmu\)/kg & 0 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _IC_ & Silicon & 85.41 kgCO\({}_{2}\)/kg & 250 \(\upmu\)/kg & 0 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _IC bumps_ & Gold & 187.220 kgCo\({}_{2}\)/kg & 41.540 \(\upmu\)/kg & 41,540 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _ACP_ & Epoxy-based material & 3.34 kgCo\({}_{2}\)/kg & 2.5 \(\upmu\)/kg & 2.5 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _ACP Metal_ & Nickel & 5.94 kgCo\({}_{2}\)/kg & 13.817 \(\upmu\)/kg & 24.8 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _Adhesive_ & Polyurethane & 3.34 kgCO\({}_{2}\)/kg & 0.99 \(\upmu\)/kg & 0.99 \(\upmu\)/kg \\  & Copper & 3.97 kgCO\({}_{2}\)/kg & 5.618 \(\upmu\)/kg & 8.935 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _Aerial_ & Aluminium & 14.90 kgCo\({}_{2}\)/kg & 1.533 \(\upmu\)/kg & 2.693 \(\upmu\)/kg \\  & Silver (in print) & 155.48 kgCO\({}_{2}\)/kg & 849 \(\upmu\)/kg & 849 \(\upmu\)/kg \\  & Bonding agent (in print & 3.34 kgCO\({}_{2}\)/kg & 2.5 \(\upmu\)/kg & 2.5 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _Substrate_ & PET & 3.18 kgCO\({}_{2}\)/kg & 0.86 \(\upmu\)/kg & 0.86 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ _Adhesive_ & Acrylate & 3.34 kgCO\({}_{2}\)/kg & 2.5 \(\upmu\)/kg & 0 \(\upmu\)/kg \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: The theoretical environmental and economic impact of RFID tag recovered materials. After all, disposing of electronic waste is a cost. It is precisely for this reason that eco-mafias are enriched with the illegal disposal of this type of waste from the electronics industry: According to UNEP data, the United Nations environmental program, 90% of the world's electronic waste is disposed of and illegally downloaded for a turnover of 19 billion dollars. Smartphones and computers are among the objects that contribute most to accumulation. The export of hazardous and environmentally hazardous waste from OECD countries to those that are not part of it is prohibited, but thousands of tons of waste continue to be exported after being declared as secondhand goods.