# Comparative Analysis of Target Displacements in RC Buildings for 2023 Turkiye Earthquakes
## 2 Tectonic Structure of Turkiye and 2023 Kahramanmaras Earthquakes
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline
**No.** & **Province** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Earthquake** \\ **Zone** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **1996** \\ **PGA (g)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **2018** \\ **PGA (g)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **2018** \\ **PGA (g)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **S\({}_{\text{DS}}\) 2007** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **S\({}_{\text{DS}}\) 2018** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **S\({}_{\text{DS}}\) 2007** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
1 & Hatay & 1 & 0.400 & 0.446 & 1.115 & 1.000 & 1.260 & 1.260 \\ \hline
2 & Kahramanmaras & 1 & 0.400 & 0.380 & 0.950 & 1.000 & 1.091 & 1.091 \\ \hline
3 & Adyaman & 2 & 0.300 & 0.241 & 0.803 & 0.750 & 0.728 & 0.971 \\ \hline
4 & Kilis & 4 & 0.100 & 0.207 & 2.070 & 0.250 & 0.631 & 2.524 \\ \hline
5 & Diyarbakir & 2 & 0.300 & 0.142 & 0.473 & 0.750 & 0.413 & 0.551 \\ \hline
6 & Sanhurfa & 3 & 0.200 & 0.110 & 0.550 & 0.500 & 0.317 & 0.634 \\ \hline
7 & Malatya & 1 & 0.400 & 0.344 & 0.860 & 1.000 & 0.985 & 0.985 \\ \hline
8 & Osmaniye & 1 & 0.400 & 0.311 & 0.778 & 1.000 & 0.877 & 0.877 \\ \hline
9 & Adana & 2 & 0.300 & 0.232 & 0.773 & 0.750 & 0.683 & 0.911 \\ \hline
10 & Elazig & 2 & 0.300 & 0.400 & 1.333 & 0.750 & 1.147 & 1.529 \\ \hline
11 & Gaziantep & 3 & 0.200 & 0.164 & 0.820 & 0.500 & 0.500 & 1.000 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: The comparison of the predicted PGA and S\({}_{\text{DS}}\) on the last two maps and codes for the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake region. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline
**No.** & **Province** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Measured** \\ **Maximum** \\ **PGA (g)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **TSDC-2007** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-2** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Provide or** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-2** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **TBEC-2018** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-1** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Provide or** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-1** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **TBEC-2018** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-1** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Provide or** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-1** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **TBC-2018** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-2** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Provide or** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-2** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Not** \\ **DD-1** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Provide or** \\ **Not** \\ **DD-1** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
1 & Hatay & 1.399 & 0.400 & X & 0.446 & X & 0.890 & X \\
2 & Kahramanmaras & 2.079 & 0.400 & X & 0.380 & X & 0.699 & X \\
3 & Adyaman & 0.897 & 0.300 & X & 0.241 & X & 0.419 & X \\
4 & Kilis & 0.054 & 0.100 & \(\surd\) & 0.207 & \(\surd\) & 0.421 & \(\surd\) \\
5 & Diyarbakir & 0.119 & 0.300 & \(\surd\) & 0.142 & \(\surd\) & 0.254 & \(\surd\) \\
6 & Sanhurfa & 0.243 & 0.200 & X & 0.110 & X & 0.221 & X \\
7 & Malatya & 0.476 & 0.400 & X & 0.344 & X & 0.648 & \(\surd\) \\
8 & Osmaniye & 0.343 & 0.400 & \(\surd\) & 0.311 & X & 0.605 & \(\surd\) \\
9 & Adana & 0.410 & 0.300 & X & 0.232 & X & 0.450 & \(\surd\) \\
10 & Elazig & 0.071 & 0.300 & \(\surd\) & 0.400 & \(\surd\) & 0.740 & \(\surd\) \\
11 & Gaziantep & 0.667 & 0.200 & X & 0.164 & X & 0.320 & X \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Comparison of the measured and predicted PGAs. provinces. For the 1 st-degree earthquake zone, it was taken as 0.400 g, for the 2 nd-degree earthquake zone, it was taken as 0.300 g, for the 3 rd-degree earthquake zone, it was taken as 0.200 g and for the 4 th-degree earthquake zone, it was taken as 0.100 g in the previous earthquake zone map in Turkiye. The 2018-PGA values used in this table are obtained directly from TEHIWA. While the predicted PGAs in the previous earthquake zone map were adequately represented for Kilis, Diyarbakir, Osmaniye, and Elazg, the measured PGAs for other provinces exceeded the predicted values. In the current earthquake hazard map, the PGAs foreseen for standard design ground motion (DD-2) are sufficient for Kilis, Diyarbakir, and Elazg, but there is an exceedance for other provinces.