## 2 Literature Review
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Ref. No.** & **Ship Name** & **Year** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Length** \\ **Overall** \\ **(m)** \\ \end{tabular} & **Passengers** & **Vehicle** & **Speed** & **Power** &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Battery** \\ **Capacity** \\ **(kWh)** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
[19] &
\begin{tabular}{c} MV Hallaig \\ Scotland \\ \end{tabular} & 2012 & 43 & 150 & 23 & 9 & 750 & 700 \\
[20] & MV Lochinvar Scotland & 2013 & 43 & 150 & 23 & 9 & 750 & 700 \\
[21] & Ampere Norway & 2014 & 80 & 360 & 120 & 10 & 900 & 1000 \\
[22] &
\begin{tabular}{c} M/F Deutschland \\ Germany * \\ \end{tabular} & 2014 & 142 & 1200 & 364 & 18.8 & 12,000 & 2600 \\
[23] &
\begin{tabular}{c} [PERSON] Denmark * \\ \end{tabular} & 2014 & 142 & 1140 & 364 & 18.5 & 12,000 & 1600 \\
[24] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Prinsesse Benedikte \\ Denmark * \\ \end{tabular} & 2015 & 142 & 1140 & 364 & 18.5 & 12,000 & 1600 \\
[25] &
\begin{tabular}{c} MV Catriona Scotland \\ \end{tabular} & 2016 & 43 & 150 & 23 & 9 & 750 & 700 \\
[26] &
\begin{tabular}{c} MF Tycho Brahe \\ Denmark * \\ \end{tabular} & 2017 & 111 & 1250 & 240 & 14.5 & 6000 & 4160 \\
[27] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Elektra Finland \\ \end{tabular} & 2017 & 98 & 375 & 90 & 11 & 1800 & 1060 \\
[28] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Aurora Electric Ferry \\ Denmark * \\ \end{tabular} & 2017 & 238 & 375 & 90 & 11 & 6000 & 4160 \\
[29] &
\begin{tabular}{c} MS Color Hybrid \\ Norway \\ \end{tabular} & 2019 & 160 & 2000 & 500 & 17 & - & 5000 \\
[30] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Herjolfur IV ferry Iceland \\ \end{tabular} & 2019 & 71.78 & 540 & 70 & 12.8 & - & 2983 \\
[31] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Ellen E-ferry Danmark \\ \end{tabular} & 2019 & 59.4 & 198 & 31 & 15.5 & 1500 & 4300 \\
[32] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Island Discovery Canada \\ \end{tabular} & 2020 & 80.80 & 450 & 47 & 14 & 1800 & 800 \\
[33] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Basto electric Norway \\ \end{tabular} & 2021 & 139.2 & 600 & 200 & 15 & 4800 & 4000 \\
[34] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Wolfe Islander IV Canada \\ \end{tabular} & 2021 & 99.30 & 399 & 75 & 12 & 2080 & 4500 \\
[35] &
\begin{tabular}{c} MV Amherst Islander II \\ Canada \\ \end{tabular} & 2021 & 68 & 300 & 42 & 12.3 & - & - \\
[36] &
\begin{tabular}{c} Grotte ferry Danmark \\ \end{tabular} & 2021 & 49.9 & 303 & 23 & 11 & 750 & 1107 \\
[37] &
\begin{tabular}{c} MF Hella \\ \end{tabular} & 2022 & 84.2 & 300 & 80 & 10 & 2000 & 1582 \\
[38] &
\begin{tabular}{c} MF Dragsvik \\ \end{tabular} & 2022 & 84.2 & 300 & 80 & 10 & 2000 & 1582 \\
[39] &
\begin{tabular}{c} MF Leikanger \\ Average \\ \end{tabular} & 91.5 & 553 & 139.5 & 12.8 & 3328 & 2177 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Retrofitted vessel.  
\end{table} 
Table 1: Examples of electric ferries. Table 1 shows 21 ferries that were designed for electric propulsion or were retrofitted for electric propulsion during their lifetime. Analyzing the data from the table, certain conclusions can be drawn to predict the trend in the case of the electrification of the observed ferry fleet that uses the port of Split. Thus, the average length of the vessel is 91.5 m, the average passenger capacity is 553, the average vehicle capacity is 139.5, the average speed is 12.8 kt, the average power is 3328 kW, and the average battery capacity is 2177 kWh.