## 2 Results
### Total Polyphenol Content (TP)  
Table 1 presents the TP content of acetone and ethanol extracts of _H. odoratissimum_ and _H. patulum_. The interactive of species and extraction solvent had a significant impact of the TP content, with highest TP content (19.3 \(\pm\) 0.76 g GA 100 g\({}^{-1}\)) found in acetone extracts of _H. odoratissimum_ (_p_ < 0.000, DF = 8, F = 2144.5). Overall, TP content for acetone  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Sample** & **\textasci{*} Ext. Solvent** & **\textasci{*} TP (g GA 100 g\({}^{-1}\))** & **\textasci{*} DPPH: TAC (\(\mathbf{\mu}\)mol Trolox g\({}^{-1}\))** & **SS (g 100 mL\({}^{-1}\))** \\ \hline _H. odoratissimum_ & Acetone & 19.3 \(\pm\) 0.76 A & 13,251.5 \(\pm\) 700.55 A & 2.9 \(\pm\) 0.003 A \\ _H. patulum_ & Ethanol & 14.5 \(\pm\) 0.45 B & 9280.6 \(\pm\) 704.01 B & 1.6 \(\pm\) 0.002 B \\ _H. patulum_ & Acetone & 4.9 \(\pm\) 0.22 C & 5643.1 \(\pm\) 259.09 C & 2.9 \(\pm\) 0.001 A \\  & Ethanol & 4.4 \(\pm\) 0.09 C & 2926.0 \(\pm\) 138.48 D & 1.6 \(\pm\) 0.001 B \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{**TP (g GA 100 g\({}^{-1}\))**} \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} Variation in _Spp_ \\ Variation in _Spp_.\"Extraction solvent \\ \end{tabular} } & 8 & 2144.467 & **0.000000** \\  & 8 & 102.389 & **0.000008** \\  & 8 & 62.886 & **0.000047** \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{**DPPH: TAC (\(\mathbf{\mu}\)mol Trolox/g)**} \\ \cline{2-3}  & **DF** & **F value** & \(p\) **Value** \\ \cline{2-3}  & 8 & 545.256 & **0.000000** \\  & 8 & 125.091 & **0.000004** \\  & 8 & 4.397 & 0.069282 \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{**SS (g/100 mL)**} \\ \cline{2-3}  & **DF** & **F Value** & \(p\) **Value** \\ \cline{2-3}  & 8 & 1 & 0.404578 \\  & **8** & **1,226,185** & **0.000000** \\  & 8 & 0 & 0.671623 \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{_Pearson Correlation at \(p\leq 0.05\)_} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Variable**} & **TP (g GA 100 g\({}^{-1}\))** & **DPPH: TAC (\(\mathbf{\mu}\)mol Trolox g\({}^{-1}\))** & **SS (g 100 mL\({}^{-1}\))** \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{TP (g GA/100 g)} & 1.00 & 0.97 & 0.21 \\ \multicolumn{3}{c}{DPPH: TAC (\(\mathbf{\mu}\)mol Trolox g\({}^{-1}\))} & 0.97 & 1.00 & 0.43 \\ \multicolumn{3}{c}{SS (g 100 mL\({}^{-1}\))} & 0.21 & 0.43 & 1.00 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Mean values (_n_ = 3) along the rows with different upper-case letters are significantly different based on [PERSON]’s Multiple Range Test at \(p\leq 0.05\), \(p\) values and other parameter values in bold are statistically significant. * Ext. = Extraction, TP = total polyphenol content, DPPH: TAC = Total antioxidant capacity. Additional statistical parameters.  
\end{table}
Table 1: Effects of variation in _Helichrysum_ spp. and extraction solvents on the total polyphenol (TP), antioxidant capacity (TAC), and soluble solid (SS) yield on the crude extracts (on dry weight basis).  
and ethanolic extracts of _H. odoratissimum_ (19.3 \(\pm\) 0.76 g GA 100 g\({}^{-1}\) and 14.5 \(\pm\) 0.45 g GA 100 g\({}^{-1}\), respectively) were significantly higher than that of _H.__pathum_ for both extracts (4.9 g GA 100 g\({}^{-1}\)\(\pm\) 0.22 and 4.4 \(\pm\) 0.09 g GA 100 g\({}^{-1}\)), respectively. These findings were consistent with literature, as previous studies have also reported that different extraction solvents significantly affected the extraction yield of TP [7; 9].