## 3 Results
### Relationships between Pre-Strength Training and Functional Performance  
A greater bench press 1 RM was correlated with superior performance in the 40 m sprint, while a greater deadlift 1 RM was associated with enhanced results in the 20 m sprint, 40 m sprint, Bronco test, and L-run tests. Notably, a higher power clean 1 RM exhibited positive associations with all performance tests. However, squat 1 RM did not show significant relationships with any of the functional performances, as depicted in Figure 5.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Week 1**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Week 2**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Week 3**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Week 4**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Week 5**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Week 6**} \\ \cline{2-11}
**Exercise** & **Sets** & **\%1 RM** & **Sets** & **Sets** & **Sets** & **Sets** & **Sets** & **Sets** & **Sets** \\ \cline{2-11}  & **Reps** & **\%1 RM** & **Reps** & **\%1 RM** & **Reps** & **\%1 RM** & **Reps** & **\%1 RM** & **Reps** & **\%1 RM** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{BP} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{60–72} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{75–77} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{80–83} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{85–87} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{88–90} & 4 \\ \cline{2-11}  & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-11}  & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{SQ} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{63–66} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{68–72} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{75–78} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{82–85} & 3–4 & \multirow{2}{*}{88–90} & 3 \\ \cline{2-11}  & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-11}  & 8 & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{CL} & 7 & \multirow{2}{*}{60–70} & 7 & 7 & \multirow{2}{*}{73–75} & 7 & 7 & 6 & \multirow{2}{*}{90} & 6 \\ \cline{2-11}  & 3 & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{DL} & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{65–68} & 5 & 5 & \multirow{2}{*}{78–83} & 3 & 3 & \multirow{2}{*}{90} & 3 \\ \cline{2-11}  & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \cline{2-11}  & 8 & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: Six-week strength training protocol.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Pre**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Post**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**t-Statistics**} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(p\)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**95\% CI**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**ES**} \\ \cline{3-3} \cline{5-6}  & & & & & **Lower** & **Upper** & \\ \hline
20 m (s) & 3.01 \(\pm\) 0.15 & 2.93 \(\pm\) 0.16 & 4.70 & \textless{}0.001 & 0.049 & 0.127 & 1.08 \\
40 m (s) & 5.47 \(\pm\) 0.37 & 5.35 \(\pm\) 0.31 & 3.61 & 0.002 & 0.051 & 0.194 & 0.83 \\ VJ (cm) & 57.42 \(\pm\) 6.71 & 60.87 \(\pm\) 5.75 & \(-\)4.65 & \textless{}0.001 & \(-\)4.995 & \(-\)1.895 & \(-\)1.04 \\ BJ (cm) & 249.00 \(\pm\) 17.05 & 260.11 \(\pm\) 17.32 & \(-\)4.33 & \textless{}0.001 & \(-\)16.529 & \(-\)5.693 & \(-\)1.02 \\ Bronco (s) & 359.90 \(\pm\) 43.60 & 362.45 \(\pm\) 43.88 & \(-\)0.53 & 0.605 & \(-\)12.700 & 7.600 & \(-\)0.12 \\ L-run (s) & 8.13 \(\pm\) 0.42 & 8.12 \(\pm\) 0.38 & 0.28 & 0.781 & \(-\)0.105 & 0.138 & 0.06 \\ BP (kg/body mass) & 1.41 \(\pm\) 0.21 & 1.44 \(\pm\) 0.23 & \(-\)2.56 & 0.019 & \(-\)0.058 & \(-\)0.059 & \(-\)0.57 \\ SQ (kg/body mass) & 1.79 \(\pm\) 0.24 & 1.93 \(\pm\) 0.26 & \(-\)9.31 & \textless{}0.001 & \(-\)0.165 & \(-\)0.104 & \(-\)2.08 \\ DL (kg/body mass) & 1.92 \(\pm\) 0.35 & 2.01 \(\pm\) 0.35 & \(-\)2.21 & 0.04 & \(-\)0.179 & \(-\)0.005 & \(-\)0.49 \\ CL (kg/body mass) & 1.12 \(\pm\) 0.19 & 1.21 \(\pm\) 0.19 & 1.21 \(\pm\) 0.19 & \(-\)4.98 & \textless{}0.001 & \(-\)0.121 & \(-\)0.049 & \(-\)1.11 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\begin{tabular}{c} BP, bench press; SQ, squat; DL, deadlift; CL, power clean; VJ, vertical jump; BJ, broad jump; L, L-run; ES, Cohen’s, d effect size: 0.2 = small, 0.5 = medium, 0.8 = large, and 1.3 = very large. \\ \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 2: Pre- and post-performance and 1 RM test.