## 3 Results  
The descriptive statistics of physical capacities, metabolic capacities, and dynamic three-point shooting are presented in Table 1. Mean value, standard deviation (Sd), minimum value, and maximum value were calculated for all variables. The results of the Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analyses between physical capacities and dynamic three-point shooting accuracy are shown in Table 2 and Figure 3. The seven physical capacity variables (FMS, 20 m sprints, lane agility test, 1 RM deep squat, vertical jump, plank support test, and supine static test) were included in the multiple regression analysis due to multicollinearity issues. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that the adjusted R\({}^{2}\) was 0.335, explaining the 33.5% variation in dynamic three-point shooting accuracy. Additionally, the FMS score was significantly correlated with dynamic three-point shooting accuracy (r = 0.632, \(p\) < 0.05, 95% CI [0.000 to 0.875]). Furthermore, the performance of plank support was significantly correlated with the dynamic three-point shooting performance (r = 0.584, \(p\) < 0.05, 95% CI [\(-\)0.001 to 0.888]). However, no significant correlation was found between 1 RM bench press, 1 RM squat, 20 m sprint, supine static test, vertical jump, and dynamic three-point shooting (\(p\) > 0.05). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline
**Variables** & **Mean** & **SD** & **Minimum** & **Maximum** \\ \hline Age (y) & 19.04 & 1.31 & 16.75 & 21.17 \\ Height (cm) & 181.33 & 4.90 & 175.00 & 192.00 \\ Weight (kg) & 71.01 & 4.99 & 63.50 & 81.90 \\ Body fat rate (\%) & 24.38 & 2.71 & 20.10 & 29.60 \\ Training experience (y) & 7.83 & 1.70 & 5.00 & 11.00 \\ FMS & 14.75 & 2.42 & 10.00 & 18.00 \\
20 m Sprint (s) & 3.40 & 0.10 & 3.24 & 3.58 \\ Lane agility test (s) & 13.08 & 0.58 & 12.27 & 14.19 \\ Vertical Jump (cm) & 53.08 & 4.08 & 47.00 & 60.00 \\
1 RM bench press (kg) & 55.33 & 6.30 & 43.00 & 65.00 \\
1 RM deep squat (kg) & 90.67 & 13.97 & 65.00 & 115.00 \\ Supine static test (s) & 132.67 & 28.96 & 96.00 & 180.00 \\ Plank support test (s) & 210.67 & 56.65 & 156.00 & 322.00 \\ Maximum oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min) & 46.75 & 3.19 & 42.00 & 53.00 \\ Relative peak power (w/kg) & 9.50 & 0.61 & 8.23 & 10.18 \\ Relative average power (w/kg) & 7.18 & 0.63 & 5.87 & 7.81 \\ Average power (w) & 508.64 & 47.16 & 419.97 & 592.18 \\ Peak power (w) & 673.61 & 54.23 & 587.75 & 768.97 \\ Dynamic three-point shots made (n) & 10.42 & 1.44 & 8.00 & 13.00 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Descriptive statistics of physical capacities, metabolic capacities, and three-point shooting. On the other hand, the results of Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analyses between metabolic capacity and dynamic three-point shooting are shown in Table 3 and Figure 3. After removing independent variables due to multicollinearity issues, three metabolic capacities (maximal oxygen consumption, relative peak power, and relative average power) were included in the multiple regression analysis. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that the adjusted R\({}^{2}\) was 0.313, explaining 31.3% of the dependent variable's variation. Furthermore, the relative average power was significantly correlated with dynamic three-point shooting performance (r = 0.596, \(p\) < 0.05, 95% CI [\(-\)0.156 to 0.898]). However, there was no significant correlation between maximal oxygen consumption and average peak power (\(p\) > 0.05).