### Related Works  
In [11], experimental measurements were performed at 5.8 GHz for the shore-to-ship and ship-to-ship scenarios. The measurement data were modeled at large and small scales and the path loss exponent (\(n\)) and standard deviation (\(\sigma\)) values were found to be 5.6 and 6.4 dB for buoy-to-ship, 3.4 and 5.5 dB for boat-to-shore, and 2.7 and 4.9 dB for buoy-to-boat, respectively. Additionally, the Extreme Value Distribution (EVD) model provided the best fit for small-scale fading modeling. Shore-to-ship measurements at 2 GHz were performed in [1] for distances up to 45 km. The measurement data were modeled using an REL model that included parameters such as roughness, divergence, shadowing, and diffraction. Moreover, long-range measurement data were compared with the Plane Earth Loss (PEL), ITU-R, and REL models, and REL was found to be the best-fit model for the data. On the other hand, the variation in the shadowing coefficient with distance for different \(\beta_{0}\) values is shown graphically. In [2], shore-to-ship measurement data at 2 GHz were compared with free space, Okumura-Hata, COST 231-Hata, and ITU-R models, and the ITU-R model was found to be the most suitable for cold open sea environments. In [12], it was emphasized that shore-to-ship measurements were performed at 5.8 GHz since a higher output power was allowed. Then, the data were divided into LOS and NLOS conditions by comparing the free space, log-distance, and 2-ray model performance. However, only the \(n\) and \(\sigma\) parameters of the log-distance model were calculated as 4.58 and 3.49 dB for LOS, 2.08 and 5.12 dB for NLOS, and 4.3 and 7.15 dB for the combined LOS and NLOS scenarios. In [13], measurement data from another study were compared with the Irregular Terrain Methodology (ITM) and the proposed Improved ITM models by emphasizing that the 2-ray model was suitable for distances up to 1 km, whereas the proposed model performed better at long distances because of the consideration of the curvature of the earth. The work in [14] presented shore-to-sea environment measurements with three different antenna heights at 5.15 GHz by comparing them to free-space, 2-ray, and 3-ray models. Here, it was shown that the 2-ray model was suitable up to a certain distance calculated using the break point (\(d_{break}\)) formula, beyond which the 3-ray model was more successful. In [3], ship-to-anchored ship measurements were performed at 5.9 GHz for a distance of 2.6 km and modeled using the PEL, REL, and ITU-R models. The REL model was the most accurate in terms of the RMSE criterion, whereas for small-scale fading, the Distributed Power Two-Wave (TWDP) distribution provided the best results. On the other hand, [9] was a simulation study performed for ship-to-ship environments at 35 GHz and 94 GHz. It was stated that the 2-ray model could be used for short distances at high frequencies by emphasizing the importance of considering evaporation duct and sea surface roughness at millimeter-wave frequencies by proposing a 2-ray-based model including these parameters. In [15], to determine the sea-specific parameters, measurements were performed at 2.412 and 5.24 GHz, both on land and at sea, using the same measurement setup. A 2-3 dB difference between land and sea was observed at 2.4 GHz at a 2 m antenna height, while no significant difference was noted at 5.24 GHz at an antenna height of 5 m. Another ship-to-shore measurement campaign was performed at 5.2 GHz in [16], and a model was developed by combining the Karasawa model, which considers the scattering caused by sea surface roughness, with LOS conditions. The measurements were compared with this model and the ITU-R model, and it was concluded that the Karasawa model also performed well at 5.2 GHz. To determine the effect of the sea wave height on the received signal strength, 2.4 GHz ship-to-ship measurements were conducted in [17].