The precision design of optical structure only focuses on the optical field, and improves the antivibration performance of the optical system by means of more precise optical element processing and adjustment [19]. In this way, the cost of it is very high. And it will be powerless in case of complex environmental interference. Beam stabilization technology can improve the misaligned beam trajectory and quality, which focuses on the adjustment of the beam itself, and is also a good way to improve the beam quality [13]. The vibration control of the Optomechanical structure can improve and eliminate the beam misalignment by eliminating the vibration of Optomechanical structure. This method focuses on the source of laser beam misalignment and focuses on stabilizing the mechanical elements in the optical system. As early as 1953, American astronomer [PERSON] [20] began to solve the problem of beam jitter of optical devices by means of mechanical vibration, and achieved a good control effect. [PERSON], [PERSON] [21] and others have developed a vibration isolation device, which has been used in optical loading satellite experiments. [PERSON] [22] established a complete frame disturbance and vibration isolation optical system model, and studied the control technology of disturbance caused by reaction flywheel. In the error analysis of the National Ignition Facility (NIF), the dynamic error accounts for 92% of the total error, while the static error only accounts for 8%, and 60% of the dynamic error comes from structural vibration [23]. Therefore, it is very important to reduce the structural response amplitude of the optical facility and subsystems by solving the structural vibration error caused by random interference. For large laser facilities, beam stabilization technology and optical structure precision design were used to improve the pointing accuracy in the past. The authors of [9] studied the structural stability control strategy of the SGIII laser facility, and proposed the stability index allocation method to obtain the structural stability design parameters of laboratory platform and optical components, which verified the feasibility of the strategy. The interference of the optical system caused by structural vibration, thermal gradient, or acoustic vibration will reduce the aiming accuracy and success rate [24]. The authors of [24] analyze the structural vibration of the National Ignition Facility (NIF) by using the finite element model. The authors of [25] discuss the stability of the mirror support system in the NIF. [PERSON] [26] proposed a scheme to reduce the effect of beam direction jitter in a laser triangular displacement probe composed of a collimated red laser, a laser pointing control device, a receiving lens, and a charge coupled device. [PERSON] [27] proposed that the tracking control of beam pointing is based on the Jacobian matrix, which can carry out effective self calibration through active motion. The automatic collimation beam stabilization technology is effective for high firing rate shooting, but it is meaningless for low firing rate shooting. The space for optimization and improvement after the completion of structural design is limited. The above two methods may not meet the requirements of beam positioning index. To solve the problem of beam pointing stability, the Optomechanical coupling active control technology can be used to actively reduce the structural response to achieve the corresponding index requirements. The authors of [28] analyze the beam positioning stability of a spatial filter caused by microvibration. Because most of the optical components of a large optical system are installed on the truss, which can be disturbed by the environment, it causes the incident beam to change with time, and the beam moves back and forth in the target position. As the spatial filter is rigidly connected with the support truss, the vibration is transmitted from the support truss to the top of the truss and then transmitted to the spatial filter.