## 4 Results
The purpose of this correlation is to observe whether the seismic event had an impact on the deformation of the ground, and in what type of phase, but it does not fully describe the rate of displacement. This is due to the separation applied for the interferometric process of the images (3 months), which is not directly correlated with the date of the seismic event. This condition only provides information on the present correlation between cause and effect but does not fully establish the displacement rate in the factor of magnitude, since this requires a more detailed analysis that considers each seismic event separately. For  
Figure 4: Displacement behavior for the study region between 2014 and 2021 taken from the SCP (0.7–1). Behavior of the satellite’s Line-of-Sight Displacement (LOS) with ascending orbital direction (**a**). Behavior of vertical displacement with ascending orbital direction (**b**). Behavior of the satellite’s Line-of-Sight Displacement (LOS) with descending orbital direction (**c**). Behavior of vertical displacement with descending orbital direction (**d**). ascending LOS interferograms of the satellite (Figure 5a), it is observed that registers S7, S8, S10, S11 and S17 (Table 1), contrasted with the generated deformation line, create a positive displacement phase (uplift) due to the co-seismic effects generated. Based on the present correlation, aspects that differ between each sequence can be observed (Figure 5a,b). An important aspect to note at this point is the relationship proposed by [PERSON] and [PERSON] [7], with respect to the deformation patterns observable within the interferogram, since earthquakes of a magnitude M \(>\) 5 and with a depth of \(<\)10 km can generate clear stripe patterns. According to this, the S7 event would be concordant with these conditions, but observing the deformation line, its impact on the study region was slight. This is due to the distance between the event (epicenter) and the study region, which has a length of 96.7 km, which is why the degree of deformation as a zonation decreases as it moves away from the epicentral site, as can be seen in the works of [PERSON] et al. [63] and [PERSON] et al. [64]. In turn, this event is associated with the stroke of the Guaicaramo Fault (kinematics reverse-dextral), which is an active fault with a moderate activity rate (0.1-1 mm/year) [65]. In addition to the above, events S8 and S17 present a positive phase, but their depths (21 and 30 km respectively) are not concordant with what was proposed. For the satellite's LOS interferograms descending (Figure 5b), it is observed that registers S1, S2, S3, S8, S10, S11, S15 and S17 (Table 1) have a positive displacement phase (uplift) due to the co-seismic effects generated. Of these events, only S2 would be consistent with what was proposed by [PERSON] and [PERSON] [7]; the others differ in one condition or another. Events S4, S5, S6, S9, S12, S13, S14 and S16 differ in some parameters from those proposed; in addition, their geometry is seen in a negative displacement phase (subsidence). On the other hand, event S5 is associated with the stroke of the Suarez Fault (kinematics reverse-sinistral), which is an active fault with a low (0.01-0.1 mm/year) to moderate (0.1-1 mm/year) activity rate [65]. The S13 event is associated with the stroke of the La Salina Fault (inverse kinematics), which is an active fault with a low (0.01-0.1 mm/year) to moderate (0.1-1 mm/year) activity rate [65], and events S10, S11, S12, S14 and S15 are associated with the stroke of the Bucaramanga Fault (kinematics reverse-sinistral), which is an active fault with a moderate (0.1-1 mm/year) to high (1-10 mm/year) activity rate [65].