## 4 Simulation Results and Discussions  
As part of the MNS-CBRP routing approach, an effective route is devised to permit dependable data transfer measurements at the surface sinks. Because of this limitation, the MNS-CBRP protocol requires that each source node within a circle send data packets exclusively to the cluster leader in charge of that cube. The information gathered is then transferred to the surface sinks. After studying the performance characteristics of the 240-node MNS-CBRP network utilizing the Telnet, S-frame, and Gen-FTP applications for the purpose of this study, we came to the conclusions that are shown below in Tables 1-3. The following is a breakdown of the performance statistics for the Telnet, S-frame, and Gen-FTP programs running on the UWSN network: \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Parameter**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**STAR-LORA**} \\ \cline{2-4}  & **Telnet** & **S-Frame** & **Gen-FTP** \\ \hline Avg. fusion delay (micro sec) & 58 & 60 & 64 \\ Rx power consption(mWh) & 0.15 & 0.2 & 0.019 \\ Tx power consption (mWh) & 0.16 & 0.028 & 0.14 \\ Idle power consption (mWh) & 0.85 & 0.65 & 0.68 \\ Time spent transmitting (m s) & 28 & 50 & 62 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Parameters analysis when deploying Telnet, S-frame, and Gen-FTP of the STAR-LORA routing protocol. Available Energy When Deploying Telnet, S-Frame, and Gen-FTP in Transmit Mode of the STAR-LORA, OLSR, and LAR1 Routing Protocols  
Figure 6 is a representation of the amount of energy that is consumed by 240 nodes when STAR-LORA, OLSR, and LAR1 are used in conjunction with Telnet, S-frame, and Gen-FTP. In the case of the S-frame deployment application, the least amount of transmitting energy that is required for LAR1 is 0.006 mWh, as can be seen in Table 4. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Parameter**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**OLSR**} \\ \cline{2-4}  & **Telnet** & **S-Frame** & **Gen-FTP** \\ \hline Avg. txion delay (micro sec) & 65 & 68 & 69 \\ Rx power consption(mWh) & 0.35 & 0.024 & 0.35 \\ Tx power consption (mWh) & 0.04 & 0.07 & 0.04 \\ Idle power consption (mWh) & 0.65 & 0.75 & 0.77 \\ Time spent transmitting (m s) & 16 & 17 & 22 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Parameters analysis when deploying Telnet, S-frame, and Gen-FTP of the OLSR routing protocol. Figure 6: Available Energy when deploying Telnet, S-frame, and Gen-FTP in Transmit Mode of the STAR-LORA, OLSR, and LAR1 routing protocols. Available Energy When Deploying Telnet, S-Frame, and Gen-FTP in Receive Mode of the STAR-LORA, OLSR, and LAR1 Routing Protocols  
Figure 7 is a representation of the amount of energy that is consumed by 240 nodes when STAR-LORA, OLSR, and LAR1 are used in conjunction with Telnet, S-frame, and Gen-FTP. Table 4 illustrates that the minimum amount of receiving energy required for STAR-LORA in the Gen-FTP deployment application is 0.019 mWh. This information may be found in Table 4.  
Available Energy When Deploying Telnet, S-Frame, and Gen-FTP in Idle Mode of the STAR-LORA, OLSR, and LAR1 Routing Protocols  
Figure 8 illustrates the amount of power that is consumed by 240 nodes when STAR-LORA, OLSR, and LAR1 are used in conjunction with Telnet, S-frame, and Gen-FTP. Table 4 illustrates that the minimum amount of idle energy necessary for STAR-LORA in the S-frame deployment application is 0.65 mWh and that the minimum amount of idle energy required for OLSR in the Telnet deployment application is 0.65 mWh.