# Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Automatic Floor Plan Analysis Technology: An AHP-Based Assessment
## 3 Research Framework
### Hierarchy Structuring
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Aspect**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Criteria**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Factor**} \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} Technology \\ superiority \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Completeness *} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Technical development phase, completeness of technology, commercialization potential} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Distinctiveness *} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Novelty, originality, efficiency} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Applicability} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Time to commercialize, scalability, scale of commercialization investment} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Transferability} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Ease of technology transfer, cost of technology transfer, regulation of technology transfer} \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} Technology \\ exclusivity \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Legal rights} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Legal rights, defense of rights, scope of rights.} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Substituittivity *} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Possibility of existence of similar technologies, possibility of new technologies to emerge} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Ease of technology protection} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Difficulty of imitation, technology protection costs} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Supply and demand *} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Demand from customers, supply from providers} \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} Technology \\ constraints \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Market constraints} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Restrictions in the sales market, restrictions on buyers of products, restrictions on producers and sellers} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Technical constraints} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Requirement for purchasing raw materials, requirement for facility purchasing, technology improvement constraints, conformity with other technologies} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Social constraints} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Environmental pollution possibility, social regulation, legal regulation} \\ \cline{2-4}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Competitive constraints} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Competitors’ responses, key success factors} \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* denotes the criteria that were selected for hierarchy in this study.  
\end{table} 
Table 2: Aspects of technology valuation [30]. Technology exclusivity assesses whether there is any difficulty in exercising exclusive ownership and using the technology, along with legal rights. As this technology was developed on an open-source basis for public purposes through national R&D projects, FGI concluded that it is better to examine it in terms of alternative possibilities and supply and demand aspects rather than considering legal rights and technology protection. The classification, detail, and hierarchy of technology valuation are as follows. There are four types of criteria: completeness, distinctiveness, substitutivity, and supply and demand. The factors consist of a total of 10 categories: technical development phase, completeness of technology, commercialization potential under the completeness criteria, novelty, originality, efficiency under the distinctiveness criteria, possibility of existence of similar technologies, possibility of new technologies to emerge under the substitutivity criteria, and finally demand from customers, and supply from providers under the supply and demand criteria. The proposed model for the evaluation of floor plan analysis technology with a hierarchy of evaluation elements is shown in Figure 4, and the individual factors are defined in Table 3.