## 3 Results  
Table 5 displays the means and standard deviations of the normalized game variables (/MIN) for each playing position. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**POS** & **P/MIN** & **T2 Pa/MIN** & **T2 Pi/MIN** & **\%T2P** & **T3 Pa/MIN** & **T3 Pi/MIN** \\ \hline C & 0.349 \(\pm\) 0.134 & 0.130 \(\pm\) 0.0539 & 0.259 \(\pm\) 0.0894 & 0.496 \(\pm\) 0.0859 & 0.0118 \(\pm\) 0.0152 & 0.0390 \(\pm\) 0.0458 \\ F & 0.337 \(\pm\) 0.125 & 0.0946 \(\pm\) 0.0499 & 0.204 \(\pm\) 0.0908 & 0.460 \(\pm\) 0.127 & 0.0302 \(\pm\) 0.0225 & 0.0963 \(\pm\) 0.0560 \\ G & 0.315 \(\pm\) 0.139 & 0.0782 \(\pm\) 0.0364 & 0.174 \(\pm\) 0.0676 & 0.454 \(\pm\) 0.139 & 0.0336 \(\pm\) 0.0255 & 0.116 \(\pm\) 0.0548 \\ PF & 0.352 \(\pm\) 0.131 & 0.103 \(\pm\) 0.0544 & 0.212 \(\pm\) 0.0889 & 0.469 \(\pm\) 0.131 & 0.0294 \(\pm\) 0.0229 & 0.0924 \(\pm\) 0.0585 \\ PG & 0.275 \(\pm\) 0.111 & 0.0660 \(\pm\) 0.0371 & 0.159 \(\pm\) 0.0696 & 0.407 \(\pm\) 0.135 & 0.0319 \(\pm\) 0.0174 & 0.108 \(\pm\) 0.0443 \\ SF & 0.280 \(\pm\) 0.122 & 0.0626 \(\pm\) 0.0411 & 0.145 \(\pm\) 0.0776 & 0.417 \(\pm\) 0.118 & 0.0383 \(\pm\) 0.0260 & 0.121 \(\pm\) 0.0580 \\ SG & 0.292 \(\pm\) 0.106 & 0.0623 \(\pm\) 0.0323 & 0.142 \(\pm\) 0.0687 & 0.433 \(\pm\) 0.138 & 0.0421 \(\pm\) 0.0266 & 0.140 \(\pm\) 0.0548 \\ \hline
**POS** & **\%T3P** & **Tca/MIN** & **Tci/MIN** & **\%TC** & **Tla/MIN** & **Tli/MIN** \\ \hline C & 0.242 \(\pm\) 0.205 & 0.141 \(\pm\) 0.0538 & 0.297 \(\pm\) 0.0926 & 0.471 \(\pm\) 0.0840 & 0.0565 \(\pm\) 0.0336 & 0.0785 \(\pm\) 0.0428 \\ F & 0.278 \(\pm\) 0.145 & 0.125 \(\pm\) 0.0479 & 0.301 \(\pm\) 0.0805 & 0.410 \(\pm\) 0.0954 & 0.0551 \(\pm\) 0.0372 & 0.0754 \(\pm\) 0.0509 \\ G & 0.251 \(\pm\) 0.139 & 0.113 \(\pm\) 0.0526 & 0.289 \(\pm\) 0.0987 & 0.378 \(\pm\) 0.0874 & 0.0555 \(\pm\) 0.0364 & 0.0727 \(\pm\) 0.0445 \\ PF & 0.283 \(\pm\) 0.138 & 0.132 \(\pm\) 0.0529 & 0.304 \(\pm\) 0.0819 & 0.422 \(\pm\) 0.103 & 0.0580 \(\pm\) 0.0410 & 0.0770 \(\pm\) 0.0517 \\ PG & 0.283 \(\pm\) 0.101 & 0.0971 \(\pm\) 0.0417 & 0.266 \(\pm\) 0.0825 & 0.354 \(\pm\) 0.0874 & 0.0488 \(\pm\) 0.0355 & 0.0632 \(\pm\) 0.0426 \\ SF & 0.294 \(\pm\) 0.133 & 0.101 \(\pm\) 0.0446 & 0.266 \(\pm\) 0.0843 & 0.374 \(\pm\) 0.0816 & 0.0412 \(\pm\) 0.0302 & 0.0540 \(\pm\) 0.0354 \\ SG & 0.275 \(\pm\) 0.135 & 0.105 \(\pm\) 0.0398 & 0.286 \(\pm\) 0.0799 & 0.361 \(\pm\) 0.0990 & 0.0423 \(\pm\) 0.0278 & 0.0525 \(\pm\) 0.0321 \\ \hline
**POS** & **Tca/MIN** & **Tci/MIN** & **\%TC** & **Tla/MIN** & **Tli/MIN** & **\%TL** \\ \hline C & 0.141 \(\pm\) 0.0538 & 0.297 \(\pm\) 0.0926 & 0.471 \(\pm\) 0.0840 & 0.0565 \(\pm\) 0.0336 & 0.0785 \(\pm\) 0.0428 & 0.702 \(\pm\) 0.145 \\ F & 0.125 \(\pm\) 0.0479 & 0.301 \(\pm\) 0.0805 & 0.410 \(Table 6 presents the results of the one-way ANOVA test, which was used to identify significant differences among traditional basketball positions in basic game variables. This statistical test evaluates whether there are differences in the means of these variables across positions. The results revealed significant differences (\(p<0.05\)) in most of the variables studied. The results of the Games-Howell post hoc analysis revealed significant statistical differences among the traditional basketball positions in the Women's Euroleague competition. Significant differences between traditional playing positions were found in both two-point and three-point shooting metrics. Regarding two-point attempts per minute (T2 Pa/MIN), centers attempted significantly more shots than all other positions (\(p<0.001\)), with the largest differences observed compared to shooting guards and small forwards. Similarly, centers also registered the highest values in two-point shots made per minute (T2 Pi/MIN), followed by power forwards. Guards (PG, SG, and G) had significantly lower values in both attempts and conversions.