# Polyphenolic Content and Sensory Characteristics of New Zealand Honey Ice Cream
## 3 Results and Discussion
### Consumer Testing of Honey Ice cream
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Sample**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Variable**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Level**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**\%**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Sum**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Mean**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Mean**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Penalties**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**\(p\)-Value**} \\  & & & **(Overall** & **(Overall** & **(Drops** & **Penalties** & **(_p_-Value** \\  & & & & **Liking_) & **Liking**) & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Bush} & \multirow{4}{*}{Flavour} & Too much & 18.18\% & 42.840 & 4.284 & 0.732 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.406} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.582} \\  & & JAR & 34.55\% & 95.310 & 5.016 & & & \\  & & Not enough & 47.27\% & 123.120 & 4.735 & 0.281 & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Texture} & Too much & 18.18\% & 95.400 & 4.543 & 0.660 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.732} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.309} \\  & & JAR & 34.55\% & 109.260 & 5.203 & & & \\  & & Not enough & 47.27\% & 56.610 & 4.355 & 0.848 & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Rewarewa} & \multirow{4}{*}{Flavour} & Too much & 16.36\% & 46.440 & 5.160 & 1.191 & \multirow{4}{*}{1.351} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.004} \\  & & JAR & 38.18\% & 133.380 & 6.351 & & & \\  & & Not enough & 45.45\% & 123.570 & 4.943 & 1.409 & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Texture} & Too much & 29.09\% & 88.830 & 5.552 & 0.067 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.177} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.715} \\  & & JAR & 41.82\% & 129.240 & 5.619 & & & \\  & & Not enough & 29.09\% & 85.320 & 5.333 & 0.287 & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Thyme} & \multirow{4}{*}{Flavour} & Too much & 41.82\% & 67.950 & 2.954 & 1.658 & \multirow{4}{*}{1.662} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.045} \\  & & JAR & 14.55\% & 36.900 & 4.613 & & & \\  & & Not enough & 43.64\% & 70.740 & 2.948 & 1.665 & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Texture} & Too much & 25.45\% & 46.890 & 3.349 & 0.242 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.626} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.310} \\  & & JAR & 36.36\% & 71.820 & 3.591 & & & \\  & & Not enough & 38.18\% & 56.880 & 2.709 & 0.882 & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{K\&Amahi} & \multirow{4}{*}{Flavour} & Too much & 36.36\% & 91.080 & 4.554 & 1.574 & \multirow{4}{*}{1.293} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.009} \\  & & JAR & 41.82\% & 140.940 & 6.128 & & & \\  & & Not enough & 21.82\% & 63.630 & 5.303 & 0.825 & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Texture} & Too much & 23.64\% & 72.720 & 5.594 & \(-0.061\) & & \\  & & JAR & 49.09\% & 149.400 & 5.533 & & 0.310 & 0.535 \\  & & Not enough & 27.27\% & 73.530 & 4.902 & 0.631 & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{P\&} \multirow{4}{*}{Flavour} & Too much & 30.91\% & 97.290 & 5.723 & 0.335 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.229} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.579} \\  & & JAR & 52.73\% & 175.680 & 6.058 & & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Flavour} & Not enough & 16.36\% & 54.270 & 6.030 & 0.028 & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Texture} & Too much & 41.82\% & 140.130 & 6.093 & \(-0.010\) & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Texture} & JAR & 43.64\% & 145.980 & 6.083 & & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & & Not enough & 14.55\% & 41.130 & 5.141 & 0.941 & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Clover} & \multirow{4}{*}{Flavour} & Too much & 54.55\% & 129.330 & 4.311 & 2.158 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.240} & \multirow{4}{*}{\(<\)0.0001} \\  & & JAR & 29.09\% & 103.500 & 6.469 & & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Flavour} & Not enough & 16.36\% & 28.980 & 3.220 & 3.249 & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{4}{*}{Texture} & Too much & 27.27\% & 86.850 & 5.790 & \(-0.707\) & & \\ \cline{2-8}  & & JAR & 49.09\% & 137.250 & 5.083 & & 0.635 & 0.289 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & Not enough & 23.64\% & 37.710 & 2.901 & 2.183 & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* The significance levels are denoted as follows: **
* for 0.1% significance level, *
* for 1% significance level, and
* for 5% significance level.  
\end{table} 
Table 5: Penalty analysis conducted with JAR questions on liking of flavour and texture.