## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l l l l} \hline
**Variables** & \(\mathbf{R^{2}}\)** & **Adjusted** & **SEE** & **RMSE** & **F** & **AIC \({}^{*}\)n** & **BIC\({}^{*}\)** & **T** & **VIF** \\ \hline Dependent & & & & & & & & & \\ variable & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline BMC by DXA (bg) & & & & & & & & & \\ Model 1 & 0.821 & 0.023 & 0.209 & 2891.15 & \(-\)16.604 & \(-\)106.822 & 0.179 & 1.00 \\ Model 2 & 0.891 & 0.013 & 0.163 & 87.27 & \(-\)44.170 & \(-\)123.594 & 0.109 & 1.93 \\ Model 3A & 0.899 & 0.012 & 0.157 & 81.08 & \(-\)47.867 & \(-\)125.133 & 0.101 & 3.22 \\ Model 3B & 0.898 & 0.012 & 0.158 & 79.86 & \(-\)46.989 & \(-\)124.258 & 0.102 & 3.24 \\ Model 4A & 0.907 & 0.011 & 0.150 & 103.93 & \(-\)54.335 & \(-\)133.760 & 0.093 & 1.78 \\ Model 4B & 0.896 & 0.012 & 0.159 & 78.74 & \(-\)46.164 & \(-\)123.429 & 0.104 & 1.69 \\ \hline Equations & & & & & & & \\ Model 1 & y = \(-\)0.0841914 + (BMC BLA \(\times\) 0.8/F51548) & & & & & & \\ Model 2 & y = \(-\)14.467094 + (BMC BLA \(\times\) 0.695882) + (BML \(\times\) 0.0568020) + (Total 50 kHz Reactance \(\times\) 0.0049804) + (TCD \(\times\) \(-\)0.0001921) + (ART type \(\times\) \(-\)0.0694619) + (\%TCD \(\times\) 0.0101579) & 0.0131579) & 0.01307992) + (Total 50 kHz Reactance \(\times\) 0.004176) + (\%BEMA \(\times\) 0.0070823) + (TCD \(\times\) \(-\)0.0001863) + (ART type \(\times\) \(-\)0.078627) + (TCD \(\times\) 0.0126501) & 0.01307992) + (TCD \(\times\) 0.0126501) & 0.01307992) + (TCD \(\times\) 0.012459) + (KID \(\times\) 0.004303) + (Right-side 50 kHz Reactance \(\times\) 0.0124439) + (\%B BLA \(\times\) 0.0064019) + (TCD \(\times\) \(-\)0.0001913) + (ART type \(\times\) \(-\)0.007074) + (\%TCD \(\times\) 0.012685) & 0.01307992) + (Total 50 kHz Reactance \(\times\) 0.0043537) +(TCD \(\times\) \(-\)0.0002016) + (ART type \(\times\) \(-\)0.0615134) + (STCD \(\times\) 0.01222) & 0.01307992) + (STCD \(\times\) 0.0131521) + (Body \(\times\) 0.0023503) + (\%TCD \(\times\) 0.0057326) + (TCD \(\times\) \(-\)0.0001174) + (Categorized \(\%TCD \(\times\) 0.012519) + (ART type \(\times\) \(-\)0.002002) + (SEE + standard error of estimate; RMSE = root mean square error of estimate; AIC + \(n\) = [PERSON]’s information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; T = tolerance (1 - \(R^{2}\)); adjusted); VIF = variance inflation factor; BMC = bone mass content; A = dual energy Y-ray absorption; BIA = bioccticalimpedance analysis; BIM = body mass index; TCD = total C4D = lymphocyte cell count; ART = antirecutical therapy; VIFCD = \(\times\) TCD perning; S/RF = nearly flat percentage; EVC = re-ententententent body power; Total 50 kHz Reactance = (right leg reactance + left leg reactance) + right arm reactance + trunk reactance; Right-side 50 kHz Reactance = right leg reactance + right arm reactance + trunk reactance + trunk reactance + trunk reactance \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Three sets of linear multiple regression to predicted BMC in children and adolescents diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & **Mean (SD)** & **Rho** & **SE** & **95\% CI** & **SD** & **Limits of Agreement** & \(p\) \\ \hline BMC DXA (kg) & 1.53 (0.49) & & & & & & & & \\ Model 1 & 1.53 (0.45) & 0.903 & 0.023 & 0.858 & 0.948 & 0.208 & \(-\)0.407 & 0.407 & 1.00 \\ Model 2 & 1.53 (0.47) & 0.948 & 0.013 & 0.924 & 0.973 & 0.155 & \(-\)0.303 & 0.303 & 1.00 \\ Model 3A & 1.53 (0.47) & 0.953 & 0.012 & 0.930 & 0.976 & 0.148 & \(-\)0.290 & 0.290 & 1.00 \\ Model 3B & 1.53 (0.47) & 0.952 & 0.012 & 0.929 & 0.975 & 0.149 & \(-\)0.292 & 0.292 & 1.00 \\ Model 4A & 1.53 (0.47) & 0.956 & 0.011 & 0.935 & 0.977 & 0.143 & \(-\)0.280 & 0.280 & 1.00 \\ Model 4B & 1.53 (0.47) & 0.965 & 0.012 & 0.928 & 0.975 & 0.150 & \(-\)0.294 & 0.294 & 1.00 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Correlation analysis of bone mass content (BMC) dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and predictive models in children and adolescents diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus.