## 3 Results  
### Comparative Analysis  
Table 1 shows the comparative analysis of the variables according to the level of physical activity. For MDA, statistically significant differences are observed between participants with a low and moderate level of physical activity. In this case, participants with a moderate level (0.50 \(\pm\) 0.121) show a higher degree of adherence to this dietary pattern than those with a low level (0.48 \(\pm\) 0.135). With regard to ANX, statistically significant differences were observed between participants with a low and moderate level of physical activity. It is observed that those with a low level (0.97 \(\pm\) 0.699) show higher levels of anxiety than those with a medium level of physical activity (0.77 \(\pm\) 0.582). Likewise, statistically significant differences are also shown between participants who show a low and high level of weekly physical activity, with participants who show a low level (0.97 \(\pm\) 0.699) reflecting higher levels of anxiety than those who show a high level of physical activity (0.71 \(\pm\) 0.618). Regarding CL, differences are evident for the groups with low and medium levels of physical activity. In this case, participants with a moderate level (4.00 \(\pm\) 0.876) show higher scores than those with a low level of physical activity (3.80 \(\pm\) 1.018). Continuing with E/I, statistically significant differences are observed between participants showing a low and moderate level of physical activity. In this case, participants showing a moderate level (3.98 \(\pm\) 0.670) show higher scores than those showing a low level (3.77 \(\pm\) 0.844). Statistically significant differences are also shown between participants showing a low and high level of weekly physical activity, with participants showing a high level (4.01 \(\pm\) 0.665) showing higher scores than those showing a low level of physical activity (3.77 \(\pm\) 0.844). Finally, for IR, significant differences are observed between the high and low physical activity groups. Participants with a high level of physical activity (4.15 \(\pm\) 0.745) scored higher than those with a low level of weekly physical activity (3.86 \(\pm\) 0.926).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & & **N** & **M** & **SD** & **F** & **P** & **ES** & **95\%CI** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{**MDA**} & Low & 128 & 0.48 & 0.135 & & & & \\  & Moderate & 169 & 0.50 & 0.121 & 4.095 & \(\leq\)0.05 b & 0.318 b & [0.107; 0.530] b \\  & High & 271 & 0.52 & 0.123 & & & & \\  & Low & 128 & 0.97 & 0.699 & & & & \\
**ANX** & Moderate & 170 & 0.77 & 0.582 & 7.688 & \(\leq\)0.05 ab & 0.332 a & [0.101; 0.563] a \\  & High & 271 & 0.71 & 0.618 & & & 0.403 b & [0.191; 0.615] b \\  & Low & 128 & 3.80 & 1.018 & & & & \\
**CL** & Moderate & 170 & 4.00 & 0.876 & 6.509 & \(\leq\)0.05 b & 0.399 b & [0.187; 0.611] b \\  & High & 271 & 4.14 & 0.762 & & & & \\  & Low & 128 & 3.77 & 0.844 & & & & \\
**EI** & Moderate & 170 & 3.98 & 0.670 & 5.011 & \(\leq\)0.05 ab & 0.280 a & [0.05; 0.511] a \\  & High & 271 & 4.01 & 0.665 & & & & 0.329 b & [0.116; 0.542] b \\  & Low & 128 & 3.86 & 0.926 & & & & \\
**IR** & Moderate & 170 & 4.03 & 0.895 & 5.280 & \(\leq\) 0.05 b & 0.359 b & [0.148; 0.571] b \\  & High & 271 & 4.15 & 0.745 & & & & \\  & Low & 128 & 2.32 & 0.819 & & & & \\ PM & Moderate & 170 & 2.44 & 0.823 & 0.779 & \(\geq\)0.05 & NP & NP \\  & High & 271 & 2.38 & 0.770 & & & & \\  & Low & 128 & 2.72 & 1.049 & & & & \\
**UR** & Moderate & 170 & 2.72 & 1.020 & 0.487 & \(\geq\)0.05 & NP & NP \\  & High & 271 & 2.64 & 1.015 & & & & \\  & Low & 128 & 2.63 & 0.890 & & & & \\
**MR** & Moderate & 170 & 2.78 & 0.883 & 1.029 & \(\geq\)0.05 & NP & NP \\  & High & 271 & 2.73 & 0.935 & & & & \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: Comparative study of the sample in terms of weekly physical activity level.