# An Organizational and Governance Model to Support Mass Collaborative Learning Initiatives
## 4 Demonstration
### Governance Process
#### 4.1.6 Evaluating the Feasibility of Selected Factors, Features, and Elements (Step 5)
The number of addressed items for application to the EDENCP is relatively high, aiming to provide a reasonable number of potential items for selection and also providing a chance for the evaluators to select the items from the list that are the best from their perspective. This is because, from a feasibility point of view, it is not cost-effective to implement all those items in the EDENCP. It is worth noting that the considered threshold (\(\geq\)80, which is relatively high) caused a significant reduction in the number of considered factors, features, and elements (that should be used in the next steps of evaluation). This level of threshold and high percentages of popularity, however, provide a certain degree of assurance for feasibility consideration. The graph illustrated in Figure 6 provides an improved perspective of the results presented in Table 3.  
Taking into account the considered threshold and the gained results, the following should be highlighted:  
* The dimension of admission has the highest percentage of popularity at (75%), followed by the organizational dimension with (71.42%). However, the lowest percentage of popularity (given by the evaluators) belongs to the economical dimension (20%). * The low percentage of the popularity of some dimensions (in both situations, before and after considering the threshold), namely, economical, functional, and behavioral, shows that these dimensions did not receive high attention (in comparison with other considered dimensions) from the evaluators' point of view. * Those dimensions that gained higher percentages of popularity, namely, admission, organizational, and technological, indicate that they have a high potential of feasibility \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{56.9 pt} p{56.9 pt} p{56.9 pt} p{56.9 pt}} \hline \hline
**Considered Dimensions** & **Results of Adequacy Evaluation** & **Number of Questions Questions Dimensions** & **Number of Questions per Dimension That Their Threshold Is \(\geq\)80** & **The Base for Consideration in Feasibility Evaluation** \\ \hline Organizational & **83.57\%** & 7 & 5 \\ \hline Environmental & 69.28\% & 7 & 3 \\ \hline Admission & 82.91\% & 12 & 9 \\ \hline Behavioral & 63.75\% & 8 & 3 \\ \hline Structural & 71\% & 15 & 7 \\ \hline Social & 70.71\% & 7 & 4 \\ \hline Functional & 66\% & 25 & 7 \\ \hline Economical & **58.50\%** & 10 & 2 \\ \hline Technological & 76.66\% & 9 & 6 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Results of adequacy evaluation and considered threshold that were used for feasibility evaluation. Figure 6: Results of adequacy evaluation and considered threshold that were used for feasibility evaluation. (from the evaluators' perspective) to be implemented in EDENCP. Thus, the focus of attention should be given to these dimensions. In the second stage of feasibility evaluation (for the items), the questionnaire (presented in Appendix B) was sent to the same group of partners (who participated in the adequacy evaluation), but at this time, 18 evaluators individually responded to the questions, because the partners and stakeholders decided to come up with a mix of group and individual evaluations. The results achieved from the feasibility questionnaire are presented in Table 4. Those factors, features, and elements (that are highlighted with gray color) received popularity by over 60%. They are selected as potential items for the next step of evaluation (effectiveness). At this time the threshold of 60 was suggested by the partners and stakeholders, as it is believed that it can reasonably adjust the number of considered items for effectiveness evaluation. This means that we attempted to narrow down the results with different steps of evaluation and minimized the number of considered items to a logical number of possible and feasible items that can be integrated into EDENCP.