## 9 Results and Discussions  
Our focus was on validating the experimental results presented in Figure 9b, and to accomplish this, we designed a 325 W PCB prototype. We conducted rigorous experimental tests on the proposed converter in a laboratory setting, as illustrated in Figure 9a. This real-world testing allowed us to gather practical data and evaluate the converter's performance. To further validate our findings and ensure robustness, we utilized simulation tools such as MATLAB Simulink and PLECS software. These software platforms enabled us to simulate and verify the experimental results in various scenarios, providing additional evidence of the converter's effectiveness. In our design and analysis process, we also accounted for the parasitic resistance associated with the inductors and capacitors in the converter. Recognizing the impact of these parasitic elements on the overall system performance, we incorporated their effects into our evaluations and made necessary adjustments to enhance the accuracy of our results. By combining practical experimentation, simulation tools, and careful consideration of parasitic elements, we aimed to establish the reliability and validity of the proposed converter design. These comprehensive validation efforts reinforce the credibility of our experimental results and contribute to the overall confidence in the performance of the converter. In Figure 10a, it can be seen that the output voltage is 500 V at Vg = 25 V and a load current of 0.65 A with a gain Mdc = 20. In Figure 10b, V\({}_{\rm C1}\) is equal to 29 V, which matches Vg. V\({}_{\rm C2}\) and V\({}_{\rm C3}\) are both 84.7 V, calculated using Equation (36). Additionally, V\({}_{\rm C4}\) can be observed to be equal to 169.18 V when the converter supplies a 500 V output voltage at 325 W. V\({}_{\rm C5}\), equal to the output voltage, is also shown. In Figure 10c, the voltage across the diodes is substantially reduced, resulting in a reduction in total power loss in the proposed converter (T\({}_{\rm PLPC}\)). Moreover, voltage across diodes VD\({}_{5}\), VD\({}_{6}\), and VD\({}_{7}\) is significantly reduced when the converter supplies 325 W at Vo = 500 V, where the MHSLCP inductors L\({}_{3}\) and L\({}_{4}\) operate in DCM. Figure 10d represents the current through the capacitors, while Figure 10e displays the current through the diodes. D\({}_{7}\) operates at zero current when the MHSLCP inductors operate in DCM and the converter supplies 325 W at 500 V. Figure 10f shows the current through the inductors, where the MHSLCP inductors operate in DCM and the converter supplies 325 W at 500 V.  
In Figure 11a, the VL is visible, where the voltage across L\({}_{1}\) and L\({}_{2}\) is equal to Vg, and the VL\({}_{3}\) and VL\({}_{4}\) are almost equal to MSC voltage. VL\({}_{3}\) and VL\({}_{4}\) are significantly reduced at Vo = 500 V at 325 W. Figure 11b shows the current through inductors when the proposed converter operates in CCM. Figure 11c displays Vo = 334 V and Io = 1 A at Vg = 30 V with D = 28%. Figure 11d shows Vo = 500 V and Io = 0.65 A at Vg = 30 V with D = 31%. Figure 12e reveals the Isw1 and Isw2, where the current through Sw2 is significantly lower, reducing the conduction loss of the power MOSFET. Furthermore, the Vsw\({}_{2}\) is significantly reduced when the converter supplies a 500 V output at 325 W. Moreover, the voltage across Sw\({}_{1}\) is also low at Vo = 500 V. Figure 11f shows Vo = 500 V and Io = 0.66 A at Vg = 40 V with D = 26%. Regarding the experimental results, Figure 12a displays the current through inductors L\({}_{1}\) and L\({}_{2}\), along with V\({}_{\text{C3}}\). In Figure 12b, the current through inductors L\({}_{3}\) and L\({}_{4}\) during operation in DCM is visible. Figure 12c illustrates the current through Sw\({}_{1}\) and Sw\({}_{2}\). In Figure 12d, V\({}_{\text{C4}}\) is 87 V. Figure 12e presents VD\({}_{1}\) and VD\({}_{2}\), while Figure 12f demonstrates VD\({}_{3}\) and VD\({}_{4}\) at Vs = 30 V and ID\({}_{3}\) and ID\({}_{4}\).