## 4 Conclusions  
The article demonstrates, using a case study carried out by Matlab-Simulink simulation, that a BCC, known for its voltage regulation, power factor improvement and load balancing functions in three-phase networks, can work just as well when the active powers are bidirectional through the controlled section, on one or more phases. The mathematical model, which establishes the relations for calculating the BCC susceptances and demonstrates the balancing mechanism as an effect of the power redistribution between the network phases, remains valid. Of the two regimes presented in the case study, Regime 2 was chosen so that the three-phase medium-voltage network containing DERs injects unbalanced active powers into the higher voltage network, because of the excess active power generated. The effect of the BCC intervention, or more precisely, of its dynamic variant ABCC, consists of maximizing the power factor value simultaneously with the power flow balancing through the substation. This results in voltage symmetrization both on the MV busbars and in the buses of an extended area of the network connected to them. It can be said that ABCC prevents the propagation of unbalance disturbance in the HV network, with the assembly formed by ABCC and the MV network being \"seen\" from the higher voltage network as a balanced three-phase source of active power. The article makes an additional argument in favour of the widespread use of ABCCs by extending the load-balancing function and transforming it into a power flow-balancing function. Although it does not have as high a level of technical performance (reaction speed, adjustment precision) as equipment with similar SPC-type functions, the ABCC is preferred for its constructive simplicity, and lower acquisition and operating costs. An ABCC can be installed practically anywhere in the network and can be sized with no maximum limit imposed on the rated capacitive-reactive power. Theoretically, any type of unbalance, however large, can be compensated by an ABCC. However, there is a limitation related to the fact that ABCC injects reactive power into the network. In order not to produce capacitive overcompensation, this reactive power must be taken up by the load. Therefore, the level of unbalance that can be compensated for with an ABCC is higher the lower the value of the power factor is in the controlled section. This condition is compatible with the need to reduce, as much as possible, the value of the inductive-reactive power injected into the network by the DERs inverters, which favours generation efficiency. Thus, ABCCs can be considered sources of inductive-reactive power to cover the needs of the loads, being able to be installed in one or more sections of the network. Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation: A.P. and A.B. ; Investigation: A.P., A.B., F.M.-M., C.S., A.J. and D.S. ; Writing--Original Draft Preparation: A.P., A.B. and F.M.-M.; Writing--Review & Editing: A.B. and F.M.-M., C.S., A.J. and D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2-1-PED-2021-4309, within PNCDI III, contract No. 703 PED/2022. Not applicable. **Data Availability Statement:** Dataset available on request from the authors. **Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflicts of interest. **Abbreviations**