## 3 Methodology
### Study Cases: Geothermal Wells 1 and LV5
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline \(T_{C}\) (\({}^{\circ}\)C) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**25**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**30**} \\ \hline \hline \(T_{G}\) (\({}^{\circ}\)C) & **56** & **64** & **64** \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Thermal Power (kW)**} & & \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Decoiling Capacity (\(\dot{Q}_{E}\))**} & 1.04 & 1.05 & 0.93 \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Condenser heat duty (\(\dot{Q}_{C}\))**} & 1.14 & 1.17 & 1.03 \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Low-pressure absorber heat output (\(\dot{Q}_{A\_LP}\))**} & 1.78 & 1.71 & 1.89 \\ \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Low-pressure generator heat input (\(\dot{Q}_{G\_LP}\))**} & 1.89 & 1.85 & 1.99 \\ \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**High-pressure absorber heat output (\(\dot{Q}_{A\_HP}\))**} & 1.45 & 1.49 & 1.33 \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**High-pressure generator heat input (\(\dot{Q}_{G\_HP}\))**} & 1.44 & 1.48 & 1.32 \\ \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Mechanical Power (kW)**} & & \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{Solution pump 1 (\(\dot{W}_{LP}\))} & \(5.5\times 10^{-3}\) & \(3.3\times 10^{-3}\) & \(1.1\times 10^{-2}\) \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{Solution pump 2 (\(\dot{W}_{HP}\))} & \(8.9\times 10^{-4}\) & \(7.7\times 10^{-4}\) & \(9.2\times 10^{-4}\) \\ \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Performance Indicator**} & & \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{Coefficient of performance, COP (\(\cdot\))} & 0.31 & 0.31 & 0.28 \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{Exergy efficiency, \(\eta_{Ex}\) (\(\cdot\))} & 0.38 & 0.32 & 0.37 \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{Irreversibility, \(\dot{l}\) (kW)} & 0.44 & 0.51 & 0.47 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Performance summary of the modeling of well W1 coupled to a half-effect cooling system. Case study: Refrigeration (\(T_{E}\) = \(-6\), \(PF\) = 0.7). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \(T_{\text{C}}\) (\({}^{\circ}\)C) & **25** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**30**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**35**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**40**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**45**} \\ \hline \(T_{\text{G}}\) (\({}^{\circ}\)C) & **65** & **70** & **65** & **70** & **65** & **70** & **65** & **70** & **70** \\ \hline \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Thermal Power (kW)**} \\ \hline Cooling capacity (\(\dot{Q}_{E}\)) & 24.40 & 24.05 & 23.70 & 23.35 & 22.90 & 22.60 & 20.95 & 21.40 & 7.60 \\ \hline Condenser heat duty (\(\dot{Q}_{C}\)) & 26.90 & 26.79 & 26.02 & 25.92 & 25.01 & 24.98 & 22.75 & 23.53 & 8.30 \\ \hline Low-pressure absorber heat & 33.19 & 32.92 & 34.09 & 33.81 & 35.19 & 34.78 & 37.99 & 36.48 & 59.52 \\ \hline Low-pressure generator heat & 35.97 & 35.92 & 36.72 & 36.66 & 37.63 & 37.46 & 39.99 & 38.87 & 58.80 \\ \hline High-pressure absorber heat & 34.33 & 34.29 & 33.67 & 33.64 & 32.87 & 32.92 & 30.42 & 31.53 & 11.35 \\ \hline High-pressure generator heat & 34.03 & 34.01 & 33.32 & 33.32 & 32.46 & 32.54 & 29.97 & 31.10 & 11.17 \\ \hline \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Mechanical Power (kW)**} \\ \hline Solution pump 1 (\(\dot{W}_{LP}\)) & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.06 & 0.05 & 0.21 & 0.13 & 1.58 \\ \hline Solution pump 2 (\(\dot{W}_{HP}\)) & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 0.03 & 0.04 & 0.03 & 0.02 \\ \hline \multicolumn{10}{c}{**Performance Indicator**} \\ \hline Coefficient of performance, COP (-) & 0.35 & 0.34 & 0.34 & 0.33 & 0.33 & 0.32 & 0.30 & 0.31 & 0.11 \\ \hline Exergy efficiency, \(\eta_{Ex}\) (-) & 0.16 & 0.14 & 0.23 & 0.20 & 0.32 & 0.28 & 0.43 & 0.37 & 0.18 \\ \hline Irreversibility, \(\dot{l}\) (kW) & 9.60 & 10.47 & 8.97 & 9.85 & 8.33 & 9.21 & 7.64 & 8.55 & 7.64 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Performance summary of the modeling of well W-LV5 coupled to a half-effect cooling system. Case study: Air conditioning (\(T_{E}=10\), \(PF=0.7\)).