## 5 Evaluation
### Functional Evaluation
(2017) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Quantitative analysis of measurement overhead for integrity verification. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing, Marrakech, Morocco, 3-7 April 2017; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1528-1533. [CrossRef]
* SUSE (2021) SUSE. Configuring SELinux--Security and Hardening Guide. Available online: [[https://documentation.suse.com/sles/15-SP1/html/SLES-all/cha-selinux.html#sec-selinux-support](https://documentation.suse.com/sles/15-SP1/html/SLES-all/cha-selinux.html#sec-selinux-support)]([https://documentation.suse.com/sles/15-SP1/html/SLES-all/cha-selinux.html#sec-selinux-support](https://documentation.suse.com/sles/15-SP1/html/SLES-all/cha-selinux.html#sec-selinux-support)) (accessed on 17 March 2021). * [7] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Empowering End Users to Confine Their Own Applications: The Results of a Usability Study Comparing SELinux, AppArmor, and FBAC-LSM. _ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur._**2011**, _14_, 2019604. [CrossRef]
* [8] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Analyzing the Overhead of Filesystem Protection Using Linux Security Modules. Available online: [[http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/2101.11611](http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/2101.11611)]([http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/2101.11611](http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/2101.11611)) (accessed on 22 March 2023). * [9] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Consistency analysis and flow secure enforcement of SELinux policies. _Comput. Secur._**2020**, _94_, 101816. [CrossRef]
* [10] The Linux Kernel Documentation. Smack-Linux Security Module Usage-The Linux Kernel User's and Administrator's Guide. Available online: [[https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4/admin-guide/LSM/Smack.html](https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4/admin-guide/LSM/Smack.html)]([https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4/admin-guide/LSM/Smack.html](https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4/admin-guide/LSM/Smack.html)) (accessed on 17 March 2021). * [11] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Integration of Integrity Enforcing Technologies into Embedded Control Devices: Experiences and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 22 nd Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC), Christchurch, New Zealand, 22-25 January 2017 ; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 155-164. [CrossRef]
* [12] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Design and Implementation of a TCG-based Integrity Measurement Architecture. In Proceedings of the 13 th USENIX Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA, 9-13 August 2004; USENIX Association: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2004; Volume 13, pp. 223-238. * [13] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Attestation-Based Policy Enforcement for Remote Access. In Proceedings of the 11 th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Washington DC, USA, 25-29 October 2004; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 308-317. [CrossRef]
* [14] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] A trusted open platform. _Computer_**2003**, _36_, 55-62. [CrossRef]
* [15] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Terra: A virtual machine-based platform for trusted computing. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Bolton Landing, NY, USA, 19-22 October 2003; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 193-206. [CrossRef]
* [16] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Subverting Linux' integrity measurement architecture. In Proceedings of the 15 th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Virtual, 25-28 August 2020; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1-10. [CrossRef]
* [17] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Measuring integrity on mobile phone systems.