# Emmer-Based Beverage Fortified with Fruit Juices
## 3 Results
### Viscosity
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Analyses** & **Days** & **CEB** & **GEB** & **AEB** & **BEB** & **Significance** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Consistency index K (Pa s) significance} & 1 & 10.07 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{ab,A}}\) & 12.31 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{a,AB}}\) & 14.86 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{bc,B}}\) & 13.17 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & ** \\  & 7 & 7.39 \(\pm\) 1.24 \({}^{\text{a,AB}}\) & 11.93 \(\pm\) 1.00 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & 8.31 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{a,AB}}\) & 6.35 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & * \\  & 14 & 14.32 \(\pm\) 0.06 \({}^{\text{bc,AB}}\) & 18.25 \(\pm\) 2.23 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & 8.90 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{ab,A}}\) & 11.06 \(\pm\) 1.34 \({}^{\text{ab,A}}\) & * \\  & 21 & 11.85 \(\pm\) 1.39 \({}^{\text{bc,B}}\) & 7.14 \(\pm\) 0.88 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 18.80 \(\pm\) 0.04 \({}^{\text{c,C}}\) & 14.02 \(\pm\) 0.84 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & ** \\  & 28 & 15.56 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 21.10 \(\pm\) 1.41 \({}^{\text{b,A}}\) & 35.20 \(\pm\) 2.83 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & 32.88 \(\pm\) 2.83 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & ** \\  & & ** & & *** & *** & *** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Flow behavior index n} & 1 & 0.34 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\text{ab,A}}\) & 0.37 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & 0.26 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.31 \(\pm\) 0.01 \({}^{\text{ab,AB}}\) & * \\  & 7 & 0.39 \(\pm\) 0.01 \({}^{\text{b,C}}\) & 0.31 \(\pm\) 0.02 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & 0.21 \(\pm\) 0.01 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.29 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & * \\  & 14 & 0.37 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & 0.37 \(\pm\) 0.01 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & 0.24 \(\pm\) 0.01 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.32 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\text{ab,B}}\) & ** \\  & 21 & 0.25 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.26 \(\pm\) 0.05 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.32 \(\pm\) 0.05 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.39 \(\pm\) 0.02 \({}^{\text{b,A}}\) & ns \\  & 28 & 0.36 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\text{b,A}}\) & 0.26 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.32 \(\pm\) 0.13 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.29 \(\pm\) 0.01 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & ns \\  & & ** & * & ns & * & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Correlation coefficient R\({}^{2}\)} & 1 & 0.982 \(\pm\) 0.002 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & 0.996 \(\pm\) 0.002 \({}^{\text{b,C}}\) & 0.953 \(\pm\) 0.004 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.995 \(\pm\) 0.001 \({}^{\text{ab,C}}\) & *** \\  & 7 & 0.972 \(\pm\) 0.002 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.977 \(\pm\) 0.002 \({}^{\text{ab,A}}\) & 0.995 \(\pm\) 0.003 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & 0.991 \(\pm\) 0.001 \({}^{\text{a,B}}\) & ** \\  & 14 & 0.998 \(\pm\) 0.001 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & 0.991 \(\pm\) 0.010 \({}^{\text{ab,B}}\) & 0.953 \(\pm\) 0.004 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.997 \(\pm\) 0.001 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & ** \\  & 21 & 0.993 \(\pm\) 0.004 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & 0.966 \(\pm\) 0.013 \({}^{\text{a,A}}\) & 0.995 \(\pm\) 0.003 \({}^{\text{b,A}}\) & 0.997 \(\pm\) 0.001 \({}^{\text{b,B}}\) & ** \\  & 28 & 0.993 \(\pm\) 0.002 \({}^{\text{b,A}}\) & 0.996 \(\pm\) 0.001 \({}^{\text{b,A}}\) & 0.996 \(\pm\) 0.003 \({}^{\text{b,A}}\) & 0.995 \(\pm\) 0.001 \({}^{\text{ab,A}}\) & ns \\  & ** & & *** & *** & * \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* \({}^{\text{a,C}}\) Means within a column at the same analysis with different lowerose superscripts differ significantly (\(p<0.05\)); \({}^{\text{a,C}}\) Means within a row with different uppercase superscripts differ significantly (\(p<0.05\)); Values are mean \(\pm\) SD of three independent experiments; (CEB: Control Emmer Beverage; GEB: Emmer Beverage with Grape juice; BEB: Emmer Beverage with Blueberry juice; AEB: Emmer Beverage with Aronia juice); \({}^{*}p<0.05\); \({}^{**}p<0.01\); \({}^{***}p<0.001\); ns: not significant.  
\end{table} 
Table 3: Power law model fitting data of flow behavior index (n), the consistency index (K) and regression coefficient (R\({}^{2}\)) of beverages during storage at 4 \({}^{\text{c}}\)C.  
The K values of all beverages showed the trend of viscosity during storage; with higher K values indicating an increase in viscosity [25; 26].