## 7 Evaluation
### Results
#### 7.3.1 Quantitative--Likert Scale Analysis  
This result provides a summary of the response distributions for the Likert scale questions listed in Section 7.2 (see Figure 4), each assessing different aspects of a survey or study. **USQO1--user satisfaction:** The results for this question indicated a diverse range of opinions among respondents regarding their satisfaction. While there was a notable number of respondents who selected Option 3 (_neutral_), suggesting a balanced sentiment, Options 4 (_satisfied_) and 5 (_very satisfied_) also received substantial endorsements. Some respondents expressed lower levels of satisfaction with Options 1 (_not satisfied at all_) and 2 (_slightly satisfied_). **USQO2--user satisfaction:** Similar to the previous user satisfaction question, this one also presented a varied sentiment among respondents. Options 3 (_neutral_), 4 (_satisfied_), and 5 (_very satisfied_) received significant responses, indicating a range of positive sentiments. However, Options 1 (_not satisfied at all_) and 2 (_slightly satisfied_) also had their representations among the responses, suggesting diversity in satisfaction levels. **EQO1--effectiveness:** When assessing the effectiveness of the system, a notable number of respondents selected Options 3 (_neutral_) and 4 (_satisfied_). However, there was also the presence of Options 1 (_not effective at all_) and 2 (_slightly effective_) in the responses, indicating varying views on the system's effectiveness. **EQO2--effectiveness:** Similar to the previous effectiveness question, this one also presented a mix of opinions. Option 3 (_neutral_) was prominent, but there was also a range of responses in Options 2 (_slightly effective_) and 4 (_satisfied_). This suggests that respondents had diverse perceptions of the system's effectiveness. **SQO1--support:** The results for this question on support indicated a concentration of responses in Option 3 (_neutral_), signifying a somewhat balanced sentiment. However, there were notable numbers of respondents who selected Options 4 (_good support_) and 5 (_excellent support_), indicating positive views of the support received. **SQO2--support:** Similar to the previous support question, this one also showed a concentration in Option 3 (_neutral_) and a range of opinions in Options 2 (_slightly dissatisfied_) and 4 (_good support_). This indicates that respondents had varying perceptions of the support provided. **UQO1--usefulness:** When evaluating usefulness, a substantial number of respondents chose Options 3 (_useful_) and 4 (_very useful_). However, Options 1 (_not useful at all_) and 2 (_slightly useful_) also received responses, suggesting varying levels of perceived usefulness. **UQO2--usefulness:** Like the previous question on usefulness, this one also displayed positive sentiments with a concentration in Options 3 (_useful_) and 4 (_very useful_). Options 1 (_not useful at all_) and 2 (_slightly useful_) were also represented among the responses. **LQO1--learnability:** For the learnability question, the majority of respondents selected Options 3 (_neutral_), 4 (_easy to learn_), and 5 (_very easy to learn_), indicating a positive sentiment towards the system's learnability. However, Options 1 (_difficult to learn_) and 2 (_slightly difficult to learn_) also received responses. Figure 4: Likert scale of results. **LQO2--learnability:** Similar to the previous question on learnability, this one also showed a preference for Options 3 (_neutral_), 4 (_easy to learn_), and 5 (_very easy to learn_). Options 1 (_difficult to learn_) and 2 (_slightly difficult to learn_) had fewer representations in the responses. In analysing the Likert scale responses across various key factors, it was evident that the opinions and sentiments of the respondents varied significantly. These diverse perspectives shed light on the multifaceted nature of user experiences with the SKATEBOARD system.