## 4 Results
### Country Analysis  
The following elaborated ranking in Table 9 allows us to compare productivity and influence between countries and see if it is aligned with the previous rankings. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline
**R** & **Country** & **h** & **TC** & **TPS** & **Pop** & **TC/Pop** & **TPS/Pop** & \(\geq\)**100** & \(\geq\)**50** & \(\geq\)**20** \\ \hline
1 & CHINA & 23 & 1909 & 96 & 1422.58 & 1.342 & 0.067 & 4 & 6 & 16 \\
2 & USA & 10 & 371 & 23 & 343.48 & 1.080 & 0.067 & 0 & 3 & 5 \\
3 & UNITED KINGDOM & 8 & 217 & 11 & 68.68 & 3.159 & 0.160 & 0 & 0 & 4 \\
4 & AUSTRALIA & 5 & 101 & 8 & 26.45 & 3.818 & 0.302 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
5 & INDIA & 5 & 85 & 9 & 1438.07 & 0.059 & 0.006 & 0 & 0 & 2 \\
6 & IRELAND & 4 & 155 & 4 & 5.20 & 29.827 & 0.770 & 0 & 1 & 2 \\
7 & MALAYSIA & 4 & 63 & 4 & 35.13 & 1.794 & 0.114 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
8 & ITALY & 4 & 57 & 5 & 59.50 & 0.958 & 0.084 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
9 & SPAIN & 3 & 186 & 7 & 47.91 & 3.882 & 0.146 & 0 & 2 & 1 \\
10 & SWEDEN & 3 & 67 & 3 & 10.55 & 6.350 & 0.284 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
11 & PORTUGAL & 3 & 46 & 3 & 10.53 & 4.368 & 0.285 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
12 & SAUDI ARABIA & 3 & 24 & 6 & 33.26 & 0.721 & 0.180 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
13 & TURKEY & 2 & 235 & 2 & 87.27 & 2.693 & 0.023 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
14 & GREECE & 2 & 90 & 4 & 10.24 & 8.787 & 0.391 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\
15 & NORWAY & 2 & 54 & 3 & 5.52 & 9.783 & 0.543 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline \end{tabular}  
* The abbreviations are the same as in Tables 1 and 3, except for Pop—population (in millions), TPS/Pop—studies per millions of population, and TC/Pop—citations per millions of population.  
\end{table} 
Table 9: The 15 most productive and influential countries in research on artificial intelligence risk assessment in businesses. Figure 3: Clations between institutions. Overlay visualization via VOSviewer. As for the previous ones, it is ordered first by the country's local h-Index, second by the number of citations received, and third by the number of papers published on the research subject, according to the WoS database. We can see in Table 9 some countries that were identified before, such as China, the U.S.A., the United Kingdom, Australia, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Portugal, and Saudi Arabia. In contrast, there are countries appearing in Table 8 that do not appear in Table 9, such as Singapore, Lithuania, and UAE. This is because other countries have a higher number of active and influential institutions, allowing them to overcome the former in terms of the combination of the h-Index, the number of publications, and the number of citations. On the other hand, countries appearing in Table 9 for the first time, namely, India, Malaysia, Turkey, Greece, and Norway, have a high number of publications but are highly distributed among different institutions; India, for example, has nine publications from nine different institutions. These are the reasons why Table 9 has been included in this paper, that is, in order to provide a precise view of the most productive and influential countries. Countries with larger populations can have some advantages regarding scientific production. To take this into account, the total populations in millions in 2023 according to Our World In Data, a website curated by the University of Oxford [73], have been included, accompanied by the ratios of citations and publications per million inhabitants. Population data for 2024 were not available at the time we wrote this paper. According to these data, the country with the most publications and citations per inhabitant was Ireland, followed by Norway, Greece, and Australia (all above average). Additionally, only two countries (China and Turkey) have papers with 100 or more citations, five have papers with 50 or more citations (China, U.S.A., Ireland, Spain, and Greece), and thirteen have papers with 20 or more citations. Another aspect that this paper evaluates is the diversity of nationalities of the teams that collaborate in each paper.