## 6 Discussion  
This present study aimed to identify the main factors affecting the InfoSec of BYOD programmes in the KSA. It also examined the concerns and advantages of BYOD programmes and digital transformation by analysing and solving existing problems. Apart from the obvious aspects and advantages, three new constructs, PT-Bs, PT-Ps, and EA; were added to the theoretical framework of this present study. Personal and organisational \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{_Cender_} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Mink, N - 75K, seq.} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Feminites, N - 112, 130\%} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Comventional Model} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Unventional Model} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Lending} \\ \cline{2-13}  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Eilations} & \(\lambda\)-Value & \(\rho\) & Estimation & \(\lambda\)-Value & \(\rho\) & 2 & \(\rho\) & \(\rho\) & \(\rho\) & \(\rho\) & \(\rho\) \\ \hline H1 & PE \(\rightarrow\) BI & 0.523 & 0.022 & 0.022 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 \\ H2 & EE \(\rightarrow\) BI & 0.655 & 4.992 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 \\ \hline H3 & ST \(\rightarrow\) BI & 0.725 & 0.440 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 \\ \hline H4 & PT \(\rightarrow\) BI & 0.253 & 0.520 & 0.020 & 0.022 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 \\ \hline H5 & PT \(\rightarrow\) PT & 0.605 & 0.640 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 \\ \hline H6 & ST \(\rightarrow\) PT & 0.605 & 0.640 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 \\ \hline H7 & EA \(\rightarrow\) BI & 0.605 & 0.640 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 & 0.020 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Summary of path coefficients, \(t\)-values, and \(p\)-values of gender and experience moderators. threats are important factors that hinder the real-life acceptance of technical transformations at organisations. Therefore, identifying risks and solving them will increase BYOD acceptance. Furthermore, as remote and online working became the norm during the COVID-19 pandemic, BYOD programmes could attract employees to organisations that actively invest in digitisation. Our previous study highlighted the most important features and benefits of BYOD programmes during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in line with the plans of the KSA to increase spending efficiency and diversify non-oil revenues [70]. The literature review addressed many of the long-standing misgivings about BYOD adoption. However, as the KSA works towards accomplishing the objectives of the Saudi Vision 2030 Plan, which includes reaching the technical readiness outlined by the IMD, these reservations remain a major obstacle to BYOD adoption in the country [70; 71; 72]. According to most of the respondents of this present study, this was due to a lack of BYOD frameworks, regulations, and policies on the execution of administrative tasks and working on personal devices in the workplace. Multiple studies have examined the challenges of implementing BYOD programmes, policies, and governance standards in government, private, and non-profit sectors that are interested in digital transformation and digitisation [70; 72]. Most of these studies concluded that employee hesitancy was on the rise due to a lack of awareness and sufficient support to reach BYOD best practices in the workplace while employers were concerned with conflicts of interest and that employees may abuse BYOD programmes to access the resources of an organisation for personal gain. Furthermore, employers in both the private and government sectors are motivated to adopt BYOD programmes to reduce expenditure, increase spending efficiency, and obtain the highest benefits. However, employees may take advantage of the various resources of an organisation, whether in an ethical or other manner.