## 3 Results
It is seen that the variations in the curves in the bedroom and entrance are smoother, and the variations in the other two environments are more variable. Figure 10 shows the cumulative probability values (percentage of success) of broadband measurements and the changes in the best-fit curves fitted to them. It can be seen from the figure that the data for all four environments shows a smooth change. Figure 8: Density changes of broadband 8 (**a**) bedroom, 8 (**b**) livingroom, 8 (**c**) entrance and 8 (**d**) kitchen -induced electric field measurements made in four different environments and curves fitted to these changes. Figure 9: Cumulative probability changes of 50 Hz 9 (**a**) bedroom, 9 (**b**) livingroom, 9 (**c**) entrance and 9 (**d**) kitchen source electric field measurements in four different environments and curves fitted to these changes. Figure 11 shows the change of 50 Hz (a) and broadband (b) electric field statistical values depending on the measurement environment. In Table 5, the number, percentage, average, and total of broadband electric field measurements within 1000 data points in six sub-bands are given. In Table 5, of the 1000 electric field effective values measured for the 1 st environment (bedroom), 960 (96%) are ETC 2, 10 of them are GSM 900 (1%) and the remaining 30 electric field fields are measured in the ETC 1 (30%) sub-band. In the second environment, it is seen that 959 electric field values for the medium are in the ETC 2 (95.9%), 21 in the GSM 900 (2.1%), 19 in the LTE 800 (1.9%), and 1 in the LTE 1800 (0.1%) sub-band. It can be seen from the table that the measurements are concentrated in the ETC 2 sub-band (96%; 95.9%; 99.8%; and 48.1%). Figure 11: Variation of the statistical values of the effective electric field values obtained in (a) low-frequency, and (b) broadband electrical measurement according to the environments. Figure 10: Cumulative changes of 10 (**a**) bedroom, 10 (**b**) livingroom, 10 (**c**) entrance and 10 (**d**) kitchen 50 Hz broadband-induced electric field measurements in four different environments and curves fitted to these changes. The mathematical expressions of the curves applied to the measurement results are given below (Density function). \[f(x;m,\Omega)_{nakagam}=\frac{2m^{m}}{\Gamma(m)m^{m}}x^{2m-1}exp\left(-\frac{m}{ \Omega}x^{2}\right),\;\forall x\geq 0;m\geq 0.5;\Omega>0 \tag{14}\]  
\[\mu=mean_{nakagami}=\frac{\Gamma\left(m+\frac{1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma(m)}\;\left( \frac{(\Omega)}{m}\right)^{0.5} \tag{15}\]  
\[\sigma^{2}=variance_{nakagami}=\Omega\left(1-\frac{1}{m}\left(\frac{\Gamma\left( m+\frac{1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma(m)}\right)^{2}\right) \tag{16}\]  
\[f(x;c,k)_{burr}=\frac{ckx^{c-1}}{\left(1+x^{c}\right)^{k+1}},\;\;c>0;k>0 \tag{17}\]  
Figure 7:0  
Figure 7:1  
Figure 7:2  
Figure 7:3  
Figure 7:4 \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Bands** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Number of Data(\%)**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Eaverage (V/m)/(\%)**} \\ \hline LTE 800 & 0 & 19/1.9 & 0 & 448/44.8 & 0 & 6.34/18.13 \\ \hline ETC 1 & 30/3 & 0 & 1/0.1 & 1/0.1 & 11.36/42.68 & \\ \hline GSM900 & 10/1 & 21/2.1 & 0 & 1/0.1 & 7.62/28.63 & 5.26/15.02 \\ \hline ETC 2 & 960/96 & 959/95.9 & 998/99.8 & 481/48.1 & 7.64/28.68 & 18.84/53.81 \\ \hline LTE 1800 & 0 & 1/0.1 & 0 & 69/6.9 & 4.56/13.02 \\ \hline WLAN & 0 & 0 & 1/0.1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline  & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 1 & 2 \\ \hline
**Bands** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Etotal (V/m)/(\%)**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Eaverage (V/m)/(\%)**} \\ \hline LTE 800 & 0 & 120.64/0.65 & 0 & 2229.75/47.85 & 0 & 4.97/19.45 \\ \hline ETC 1 & 341.03/4.39 & 0 & 26.34/0.073 & 6.96/0.15 & 26.34/34 & 6.96/27.24 \\ \hline GSM900 & 76.26/0.98 & 110.49/0.6 & 0 & 4.68/0.1 & 0 & 4.68/18.31 \\ \hline ETC 2 & 7335.23/94.61 & 18,070.33/98.71 & 35,733/99.88 & 2101.47/45.1 & 35.80/46 & 4.36/17.07 \\ \hline LTE 1800 & 0 & 4.56/0.02 & 0 & 316.04/6.78 & 0 & 4.58/17.9 \\ \hline WLAN & 0 & 0 & 14.98/0.041 & 0 & 14.98/20 & 0 \\ \hline  & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \end{tabular}  
1—bedroom, 2—livingroom, 3—entrance, 4—kitchen.  
\end{table}