## 3 Results  
### Satiety  
Results of the satiety questionnaires performed can be found in Table 2. Briefly, no significant differences were reported before breakfast throughout the experimentation process, except for the question \"How full do you feel?\" In this case, the group consuming the experimental product presented a significantly higher value after 90 days of intake compared to baseline values. Therefore, this result suggests that the product does not reduce hunger in fasting conditions. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Placebo**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Experimental**} \\ \cline{3-10}  & & **Day 0** & **Day 30** & **Day 60** & **Day 90** & **Day 0** & **Day 30** & **Day 60** & **Day 90** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{**Satiety**} & How hungry do & & & & & & & & \\  & you feel? & 5.71 \(\pm\) 2.22 & 5.42 \(\pm\) 2.53 & 4.83 \(\pm\) 2.49 & 6.06 \(\pm\) 2.29 & 5.8 \(\pm\) 2.5 & 5.7 \(\pm\) 2.22 & 5.89 \(\pm\) 1.95 & 5.6 \(\pm\) 2.11 \\  & How full do you feel? & 2.9 \(\pm\) 1.83 & 3.03 \(\pm\) 1.85 & 4.00 \(\pm\) 2.26 & 3.32 \(\pm\) 2.12 & 3.13 \(\pm\) 2.05 & 3.83 \(\pm\) 1.66 & 3.74 \(\pm\) 2.05 & **4.17 \(\pm\) 1.91 \({}^{*}\)** \\  & How satisfied do & & 3.29 \(\pm\) 1.88 & 3.65 \(\pm\) 1.72 & 4.33 \(\pm\) 2.25 & 3.58 \(\pm\) 2.08 & 3.3 \(\pm\) 2.05 & 3.83 \(\pm\) 1.74 & 3.85 \(\pm\) 2.05 & 4.23 \(\pm\) 1.91 \\  & How much could you & & & & & & & \\  & eat now? & & 6.48 \(\pm\) 2.14 & 6.35 \(\pm\) 2.09 & 6.1 \(\pm\) 2.34 & 6.55 \(\pm\) 2.39 & 6.37 \(\pm\) 2.13 & 6.17 \(\pm\) 1.9 & 6.22 \(\pm\) 1.95 & 5.67 \(\pm\) 2.11 \\ \cline{2-10}  & How hungry do & & & & & & & & \\  & you feel? & 0.52 \(\pm\) 0.89 & 0.77 \(\pm\) 1.09 & 0.4 \(\pm\) 0.86 & 0.74 \(\pm\) 1.12 & 1.1 \(\pm\) 1.58 & 0.9 \(\pm\) 1.4 & 0.59 \(\pm\) 1.08 & **0.53 \(\pm\) 1.01 \(\pm\) \\  & How full do you feel? & 9.06 \(\pm\) 1.29 & 8.42 \(\pm\) 1.84 & 8.83 \(\pm\) 1.21 & 8.81 \(\pm\) 1.22 & 8.33 \(\pm\) 1.65 & **8.57 \(\pm\) 1.28 \({}^{*}\)** & **9.15 \(\pm\) 0.99 \({}^{*}\)** & **9.07 \(\pm\) 1.46 \({}^{*}\)** \\  & How satisfied do & & & & & & & & \\  & you feel? & 9.19 \(\pm\) 1.14 & 8.58 \(\pm\) 2.08 & 8.83 \(\pm\) 1.18 & 8.94 \(\pm\) 1.12 & 8.67 \(\pm\) 1.35 & **8.97 \(\pm\) 1.25 \({}^{*}\)** & **9.41 \(\pm\) 0.89 \({}^{*}\)** & 9.13 \(\pm\) 1.41 \\  & How much could you & & & & & & & & \\  & eat now? & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{**Satiety**} & How hungry do & & & & & & & & \\  & you feel? & 1.35 \(\pm\) 1.5 & 1.42 \(\pm\) 1.36 & 1.43 \(\pm\) 1.22 & 1.81 \(\pm\) 1.85 & 1.97 \(\pm\) 1.71 & 1.43 \(\pm\) 1.38 & 1.7 \(\pm\) 2.03 & **0.83 \(\pm\) 1.09 \({}^{***}\)** \\  & How full do you feel? & 7.52 \(\pm\) 2.45 & 6.77 \(\pm\) 2.35 & 7.63 \(\pm\) 1.77 & 7.35 \(\pm\) 1.84 & 7.9 \(\pm\) 1.58 & **8.27 \(\pm\) 1.64 \({}^{**}\)** & 8.3 \(\pm\) 1.51 & **8.47 \(\pm\) 2.13 \({}^{*}\)** \\  & How satisfied do & & & & & & & & \\  & you feel? & 8.16 \(\pm\) 1.68 & 7.65 \(\pm\) 1.58 & 7.63 \(\pm\) 1.79 & 7.52 \(\pm\) 1.98 & 7.83 \(\pm\) 1.66 & **8.30 \(\pm\) 1.58 \({}^{*}\)** & **8.48 \(\pm\) 1.72 \({}^{*}\)** & **8.8 \(\pm\) 1.67 \({}^{*}\)** \\  & How much could you & & & & & & & & \\  & eat now? & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\begin{tabular}{c} SD = standard deviation. Statistical significance: \({}^{*}=p<0.05\), \({}^{***}=p<0.005\) vs. baseline, \(+=p<0.05\), \({}^{*}=p<0.01\), \({}^{*}=+p<0.005\) vs. placebo. \\ \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Satiety questionnaire results. Data are presented as means \(\pm\) SD. However, noticeable differences were observed between the two study groups after the set breakfast. Specifically, the experimental group scored significantly higher compared to baseline values on the questions \"How full do you feel?\" (at day 60 and 90) and \"How satisfied do you feel?\" (at day 60), when assessed immediately after breakfast. When the participants filled out the questionnaire 1 h after breakfast, more significant results appeared, not only with respect to baseline values but also with respect to the placebo group.