## 1 Introduction
This amount of construction waste composite powder putsthe concrete in a more compact and low-alkali condition, thus enhancing the macroscopic frost resistance [11]. [PERSON] et al. combine silicon powder, slag powder, and recycled construction waste regenerated powder in concrete; they comprehensively study the performance test of using construction waste regenerated powders to replace silicon powder and cement in concrete, obtaining the optimal water-binder ratio range of 0.18-0.20. The results show that the particle size of regenerated powders is mostly larger than that of silicon powder particles, and some of them are smaller than that of cement particles. Furthermore, the pozzolanic reaction of regenerated powders as active admixtures is weak, reflecting the macroscopical performance in which the resistance to chloride ion permeability and the resistance to shrinkage are enhanced with the increase of the amount of the regenerated powders, while simultaneously the unconfined compressive strength and flexural strength are weakened [12]. [PERSON] studied the application of fine aggregate partially replaced by fly ash and coarse aggregate partially replaced by waste brick in concrete. The results showed that when the replacement rate of both fly ash and waste brick was 30%, the compressive strength of recycled concrete reached the highest value [13]. The physical and mechanical properties of four kinds of coarse aggregate with different particle sizes in fresh concrete and hardened concrete were also studied. The results show that harder original brick directs the stronger compressive strength of the concrete, and the higher density directs the higher concrete strength. The flexural strength of concrete produced with a crushed brick aggregate was approximately 8% less than that of concrete made with granite aggregate [14]. [PERSON] et al. replaced natural macadam fine aggregate with recycled brick fine aggregate of 0%, 25%, and 50% in concrete, obtaining 25, 50, 75, and 100 routine freeze-thaw cycles at 28 and 60 days of curing age, respectively. Combining the subsequent compressive strength and flexural strength tests, it was concluded that the addition of recycled brick fine aggregate could improve the frost resistance and long-term strength of concrete to a certain extent [15]. [PERSON] et al. mix coarse and fine aggregates of construction waste into concrete, respectively. The hardening density, drying shrinkage coefficient, and water absorption rate were taken as reference, the optimum replacement ratio of coarse aggregate and fine aggregate is less than 25% and within the scope of 50%-75%, respectively [16]. [PERSON] et al. mix recycled clay brick aggregate with 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% of coarse aggregate and fine aggregate in cement stabilized macadam, respectively. The compressive strength, splitting strength, compressive modulus of resilience, shrinkage strain, and freeze resistance index were used as references in the study, and the maximum mixing ratio of coarse aggregate and fine aggregate obtained was 70% and 90%, respectively [17]. [PERSON] et al. used clay bricks as pozzolanic materials after fine grinding. An ASTM accelerated mortar bar test and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that fine grinding clay bricks could effectively inhibit the expansion caused by the alkali-aggregate reaction [18]. [PERSON] replaced recycled aggregate for coarse aggregate in asphalt concrete and obtained the optimum replacement ratio of 30%-40% with the high-temperature performance taken as a reference; their results also showed an optimum replacement ratio range of 60%-70%, using the residual stability and freeze-thaw splitting strength as references. When the replacement ratio of recycled aggregate is less than 60%, the adverse effects on low-temperature performance and fatigue resistance are controllable [19].