# Proof of Optimum (PoO): Consensus Model Based on Fairness and Efficiency in Blockchain
## 7 Discussion
### Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Time**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**TSP**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**TPS**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Total**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Fairness**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Miner129**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Miner130**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Miner135**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Miner131**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Miner132**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Blocks**} \\  & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{500} & ulysse22 & 4017.13 & 118,000 & 0.97 & 32 & 13 & 32 & 20 & 21 & 118 \\  & eil51 & 2036.17 & 32,000 & 0.975 & 7 & 5 & 6 & 8 & 6 & 32 \\  & lin105 & 518.07 & 29,000 & 0.899 & 5 & 4 & 4 & 7 & 9 & 29 \\  & rd100 & 543.25 & 29,000 & 0.790 & 5 & 2 & 11 & 6 & 5 & 29 \\  & kroa100 & 776.48 & 22,000 & 0.98 & 6 & 5 & 5 & 7 & 5 & 22 \\  & tsp225 & 548.3 & 17,000 & 0.849 & 2 & 2 & 5 & 6 & 4 & 17 \\  & gr666 & 30.51 & 3000 & 0.36 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 2 & 0 & 3 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{1000} & ulysse22 & 4266.93 & 158,000 & 0.91 & 32 & 24 & 40 & 30 & 32 & 158 \\  & eil51 & 2395.38 & 161,000 & 0.96 & 27 & 41 & 38 & 29 & 26 & 161 \\  & lin105 & 957.54 & 11,000 & 0.83 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 4 & 1 & 11 \\  & rd100 & 827.57 & 15,000 & 0.67 & 2 & 1 & 5 & 1 & 6 & 15 \\  & kroa100 & 888.36 & 10,000 & 0.71 & 3 & 0 & 3 & 1 & 3 & 10 \\  & tsp225 & 482.98 & 24,000 & 0.822 & 3 & 3 & 7 & 3 & 8 & 24 \\  & gr666 & 83.4 & 5000 & 0.71 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 2 & 5 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{1500} & ulysse22 & 3925.45 & 451,000 & 0.90 & 58 & 63 & 136 & 106 & 88 & 451 \\  & eil51 & 2199.32 & 172,000 & 0.97 & 40 & 25 & 30 & 40 & 37 & 172 \\  & lin105 & 973.44 & 78,000 & 0.97 & 12 & 18 & 15 & 20 & 13 & 78 \\  & rd100 & 804.76 & 29,000 & 0.91 & 9 & 4 & 6 & 5 & 5 & 29 \\  & kroa100 & 738.5 & 22,000 & 0.83 & 5 & 1 & 7 & 5 & 4 & 22 \\  & sp225 & 539.038 & 38,000 & 0.96 & 8 & 10 & 6 & 7 & 7 & 38 \\  & gr666 & 82.028 & 9000 & 0.77 & 1 & 1 & 3 & 1 & 3 & 9 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: PoO fairness index and block creation percentages table by the time given. iterations decrease block time and allow for a higher number of transactions per second. If we explain all the transactions in general, it should be evaluated as the development of smart methods in creating blocks in the blockchain. In other words, it can be considered as an algorithm assembly that can be made with low-level equipment that does not need the power of miner devices. In Table 6, the experiment was conducted by giving a time. It was requested to create 100 blocks in each row over 1000 iterations. The connection of the number of blocks created to the fairness index was examined. It can be observed that the number of blocks and the fairness index are directly proportional in a very predictable way. Moreover, it is seen that the fairness index, that is, the percentage of block distribution, decreases to 36% in places. The use of optimization algorithms has revealed a new research area in terms of computational power. The PoW algorithm can perform the function of creating blocks, albeit at the expense of wasting energy resources, but a new consensus algorithm is proposed that directs the wasted resources in the blockchain to the practical benefits of the genetic algorithm by taking advantage of an optimization algorithm that finds the solution. Additionally, a level of decentralization of the proposed system is designed more equitably. Experimental results confirm that the PoO algorithm can create blocks in a decentralized manner. The PoO algorithm was proposed as a consensus protocol for the blockchain, where wasted energy could be used to solve optimization problems presented by any user. It was designed as an alternative to PoW-based blockchains. The research aims to make block creation more independent of high-cost hardware by directing large amounts of computing power to the practical benefits of optimization algorithms. Additionally, the computational style in the protocol makes mining with ordinary CPUs more profitable. Since computational resources are no longer wasted, public institutions and more general users can be expected to participate.