## 3 Methods and Fault-Slip Data
### Fault Slip-Data
The optimal resolved enhanced Andersonian stress tensors (\(\sigma_{1}\): solid rhomb, \(\sigma_{2}\): solid circle, and \(\sigma_{3}\): solid square) (**a**) T\({}_{\rm SS2}\), (**b**) T\({}_{\rm 1 SS3}\), (**c**) T\({}_{\rm 2 SS3}\), (**d**) T\({}_{\rm 3 SS3}\), (**e** T\({}_{\rm SS2}\), (**f** T\({}_{\rm SS7}\), (**g**) T\({}_{\rm SS7}\), and (**h**) T\({}_{\rm SS7}\) with Misfit Angle (MA) \(\leq\) 30\({}^{\circ}\). Explanation: 1. Stereographic projection (equal-area, lower hemisphere) of the TR compatible fault-slip data (TRCF), the blue balls are extensional faults in the extensional stress regimes and contractional faults in the compressional stress regimes; 2. TR diagram shows the TRCF (solid blue balls), the ‘real’ (blue colored line), and ‘theoretical’ (red dashed line) Final Tensor Ratio Line (FTRL); 3. Misfit Angle (MA) distribution of the TRCF; 4. Mohr diagram of the TRCF. Solid blue balls show the TRCF having T\({}_{\rm s}\)\(\geq\) 0.6. Open balls show the TRCF with T\({}_{\rm s}\)\(<\) 0.6. The blue line shows the lowest initial friction curve at the frictional angle \(\varphi\) = 16.7\({}^{\circ}\). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline
**ST** & **n** & **FTC** & **FTE** & \(\mathbf{\sigma_{1}}\) & \(\mathbf{\sigma_{2}}\) & \(\mathbf{\sigma_{3}}\) & **R** & **MMA** & **FT** (**MA** \(\leq\) **30\({}^{\circ}\)**) & **FT/n** (**Ca**) & **N** & **N** (**MA** \(\geq\) **30\({}^{\circ}\)**) & **SS** \\ \hline T\_MFSS2 & 16 & 12 & 4 & 072\({}^{\circ}\)-30\({}^{\circ}\) & 275\({}^{\circ}\)-58\({}^{\circ}\) & 168\({}^{\circ}\)-11\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.48 & 28.3\({}^{\circ}\) & 14 & 88 & 1-16 & 2.14 & S82 \\ T\_MFSS7 & 14 & 12 & 2 & 065\({}^{\circ}\)-22\({}^{\circ}\) & 293\({}^{\circ}\)-60\({}^{\circ}\) & 164\({}^{\circ}\)-20\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.68 & 7.0\({}^{\circ}\) & 14 & 100 & & & 18,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, & \\ T\_MFSS8 & 21 & 7 & 14 & 268\({}^{\circ}\)-78\({}^{\circ}\) & 082\({}^{\circ}\)-12\({}^{\circ}\) & 173\({}^{\circ}\)-01\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.57 & 63.8\({}^{\circ}\) & 6 & 29 & 17–37 & 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, & S83 \\ T\_MFSS7 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 274\({}^{\circ}\)-84\({}^{\circ}\) & 081\({}^{\circ}\)-05\({}^{\circ}\) & 171\({}^{\circ}\)-01\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.45 & 9.8\({}^{\circ}\) & 6 & 100 & 17, 25, 26, 31, 33, 34 & S83 \\ T\_MFSS6 & 13 & 8 & 5 & 156\({}^{\circ}\)-12\({}^{\circ}\) & 036\({}^{\circ}\)-67\({}^{\circ}\) & 250\({}^{\circ}\)-20\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.39 & 63.3\({}^{\circ}\) & 6 & 46 & 38–50 & 38, 39, 40, 42, 47, & S86 \\ T\_MFSS6 & 6 & 5 & 1 & 154\({}^{\circ}\)-04\({}^{\circ}\) & 052\({}^{\circ}\)-72\({}^{\circ}\) & 245\({}^{\circ}\)-17\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.47 & 7.1\({}^{\circ}\) & 6 & 100 & & & & 856 \\ T\_MFSS7 & 32 & 10 & 22 & 258\({}^{\circ}\)-57\({}^{\circ}\) & 151\({}^{\circ}\)-11\({}^{\circ}\) & 055\({}^{\circ}\)-31\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.11 & 76.8\({}^{\circ}\) & 5 & 16 & 51–82 & 64, 56, 65, 67, 68, 69 & S87 \\ T\_MFSS7 & 5 & 1 & 4 & 258\({}^{\circ}\)-52\({}^{\circ}\) & 351\({}^{\circ}\)-02\({}^{\circ}\) & 083\({}^{\circ}\)-38\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.39 & 10.0\({}^{\circ}\) & 5 & 100 & & & 70, 72, 76, 77, 78, & \\ T\_MFSS11 & 10 & 4 & 6 & 009\({}^{\circ}\)-08\({}^{\circ}\) & 266\({}^{\circ}\)-57\({}^{\circ}\) & 104\({}^{\circ}\)-31\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.53 & 62.7\({}^{\circ}\) & 2 & 20 & 83.92 & 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 90, & S811 \\ T\_MFSS12 & 4 & 0 & 4 & 150\({}^{\circ}\)-44\({}^{\circ}\) & 294\({}^{\circ}\)-40\({}^{\circ}\) & 041\({}^{\circ}\)-19\({}^{\circ}\) & 0.20 & 3.8\({}^{\circ}\) & 4 & 100 & & & 91, 92 & S811 \\ \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Best-fit stress tensors with MyFault, software, and MA \(\leq\) 30\({}^{\circ}\).