## 3 Results  
As can be seen in Table 1, all neuromuscular tests, both jumping and linear sprinting, present very good absolute reliability (%CV < 3% and SEM < 8%). The %MDC for jumping test was between 5.38 and 20.82% and between 4.76 and 10.43% for linear sprinting tests.  
The linear sprinting performance assessment over 10 and 20 m together with the CMJA obtained excellent absolute reliability (CV: 0.1-1.4%; 1.74-2.31% of SEM) and a lower MDC (4.76-6.36%). The unilateral jumping test (SL-CMJ) obtained a good absolute reliability (CV:1.6-2.5%; 4.96-7.92% of SEM) presents a higher percentage of MDC (13.75-20.82%), especially the jumping with the left leg.  
In addition, relative reliability shows good to excellent reliability in the 10 and 20 m linear sprinting tests and in the jumping tests CMJ, SJ and SL-CMJ with the right leg. The 5 m linear sprint and CMJA showed moderate to excellent relative reliability while the unilateral jumping tests with the left leg showed the lowest relative reliability of the set of tests (low-excellent).  
Regarding the analysis based on specific playing positions, both Bigs and Guards maintained very similar results to those in Table 1. Both have excellent absolute reliability in all tests. In the linear sprint there are hardly any differences in CV and %SEM. However, Bigs have better absolute reliability in SJ, CMJ, SL-CMJ, (CV: 0.9 vs. 1.8; 1.7 vs. 3.2; 1.7 vs. 3.1%, respectively) while Guards only have better absolute reliability in CMJA (CV: 1.3 vs. 1.6%; %SEM: 1.78 vs. 2.25%).  
In relative reliability, Bigs have a better ICC than Guards in SJ, CMJ and CMJA (0.97 vs. 0.94; 0.95 vs. 0.90; 0.98 vs. 0.97, respectively) and in 10 and 20 m linear sprint (0.92 vs. 0.88; 0.92 vs. 0.90, respectively). On the contrary, Guards have a better reliability in SL-CMJ in both legs (0.90 vs. 0.83 right leg and 0.92 vs. 0.87 left leg) and in 5 m linear sprint (0.81 vs. 0.74).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & & **ICC (95\% IC)** & **CV (\%)** & **SEM** & **SEM (\%)** & **MDC** & **MDC (\%)** & **Mean \({}^{1}\) (SD)** & **Mean \({}^{2}\) (SD)** \\ \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} SJ \\ \end{tabular} } & 0.96 (0.77–0.98) & 1.5 & 1.049 & 2.63 & 2.907 & 7.29 & 40.55 (4.95) & 39.19 (5.06) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} CMJ \\ \end{tabular} } & CMJ & 0.93 (0.84–0.96) & 2.6 & 1.835 & 4.27 & 5.086 & 11.83 & 43.68 (5.36) & 42.30 (5.68) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} SL-CMJ \\ \end{tabular} } & R & 0.97 (0.90–0.99) & 1.6 & 1.089 & 4.96 & 3.018 & 13.75 & 22.09 (4.8) & 21.79 (4.17) \\  & L & 0.84 (0.44–0.96) & 2.5 & 1.738 & 7.92 & 4.817 & 20.82 & 23.41 (3.85) & 22.86 (2.67) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} CMJA \\ \end{tabular} } & CMJ & 0.97 (0.70–0.99) & 1.4 & 1.003 & 1.94 & 2.780 & 5.38 & 52.43 (6.97) & 50.76 (6.58) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} Linear \\ \end{tabular} } & 5 m & 0.81 (0.70–0.89) & 0.1 & 0.044 & 3.85 & 0.121 & 10.43 & 1.15 (0.08) & 1.17 (0.08) \\  & 10 m & 0.91 (0.86–95) & 0.1 & 0.044 & 2.31 & 0.121 & 6.36 & 1.90 (0.09) & 1.90 (0.09) \\  & 20 m & 0.92 (0.87–0.95) & 0.1 & 0.054 & 1.74 & 0.149 & 4.76 & 3.13 (0.13) & 3.13 (0.13) \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: Intra-session relative and absolute reliability analysis of jumping and sprinting tests.  
The %MDC is lower in Bigs in SJ (4.49 vs. 8.72%), CMJ (7.76 vs. 14.15%), SL-CMJ left leg (16.70 vs. 17.03%), linear sprint 10 m (4.44 vs. 6.52%) and 20 m (4.76 vs. 4.89%). On the contrary, Guards show a higher %MDC in CMJA (6.25 vs. 4.95%), SL-CMJ right (23.04 vs. 17.21%) and linear sprint 5 m (12.52 vs. 7.30%).