## 6 Conclusions  
In conclusion, while notable strides have been taken in safety-assessment strategies for automated vehicles, certain limitations linked to practical assessment endeavours still require attention. The proposed approach underscores the significance of technology-aware practical guidance within the assessment process, which should seamlessly integrate into a comprehensive and adaptable framework. The primary contribution of this study lies in proposing the augmentation of existing scenario-based testing frameworks with a detailed examination of the underlying supporting technologies. The approach enriches the test suite employed in scenario-based testing by factoring in the specific attributes of test scenarios linked to the Key Enabling Technologies (KETs). By blending bottom-up analysis with top-down scrutiny focused on potentially hazardous traffic scenarios at the vehicle level, a more comprehensive understanding of the system's performance can be achieved. While the method outlined in this study demonstrates practicality and efficacy, certain areas warrant further exploration. Subsequent research should investigate the extent of coverage and completeness when mapping the ODD to precise technological elements in specification and testing and address the limitation posed by relying on predefined scenarios. One notable weakness of KET-related predefined test scenarios is their reliance on historical information, which may not adequately account for the expected novelties in KETs. As such, our method is designed to complement data-driven approaches that incorporate real-world data to create a more-comprehensive assessment. To overcome the potential limitations imposed by rigid, predefined templates, it is necessary to continuously develop, update, and refine the templates to remain aligned with ongoing technology developments--a challenge encountered in all checklist-based approaches. We highly recommend combining knowledge-driven and data-driven approaches in future safety-assurance-framework endeavours. This harmonious blend can enrich the assessment framework by capitalising on existing knowledge and real-world data. Its relevance is especially pronounced in situations where substantial real-world data are scarce. To facilitate the seamless integration of these approaches, we propose adopting a policy that underscores the importance of integrating prior knowledge into the assessment processes and any scenario databases. Such a policy can be a stepping stone for accommodating evolving challenges and fostering a comprehensive safety-assurance approach. Therefore, developing technology-aware assessment criteria for attributes derived from enabling technologies is important. These criteria should complement the overarching high-level requirements and encompass the fundamental behavioural facets of the automated function within the defined ODD. This involves appraising the functionality of sensors and communication devices, adherence to protocols and standards, and the effective mitigation of potential cybersecurity threats. By assimilating technology-aware assessment criteria, a more-comprehensive evaluation of the automated function's performance can be achieved. **Author Contributions:** Conceptualisation and methodology, M.S. ; validation measurements, M.B. ; investigation, M.S., A.T. and F.W. ; writing--original draft preparation, M.S., A.T. and F.W. ; writing--review and editing, M.S., A.T. and F.W. ; supervision, F.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. **Funding:** The SUNRISE project is funded by the European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Actions under grant agreement no.101069573. The views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Actions. The SCAT project (2020-04205) has received funding from Vinnova, Sweden's innovation agency. The content reflects only the authors' views.