# Content Curation in E-Learning: A Case of Study with Spanish Engineering Students
## 4 Results and Discussion
### Evaluation of the Collaborative Work, Activities, and Subjects  
Once the experience was completed, the results of questionnaire B were analyzed in order to know the opinion of the students on different issues such as teamwork, activities and the subject. The statistical results of the questionnaires were calculated using IMB SPSS Statistics software version 25 and Microsoft Excel 2013. An alpha reliability test was used to verify the internal consistency of the questionnaire related to the experience (Appendix B). Cronbach's alpha values were obtained, indicating that the test was consistent. For factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was used with a statistical level greater than 0.6 as acceptable and using the explained variance of each factor. The KMO test showed three factors: collaborative work (CW) obtained through questions Q1-Q4, activities (AC) through questions Q5-Q12, and subject factors (SB) which were obtained through questions Q13-Q16. Table 5 shows the descriptive statistics that correspond to questionnaire B (Appendix B). Figure 8: Academic results. Questions Q1-Q4 show that the students have understood the most important actions of collaborative work. Regarding questions Q5-Q16, the results show that the activities are very positive for the students because all the items exceed 70% of the maximum score that can be awarded. The rating provided by students about the teachers' implication and the impact of content curation on learning stands out with the highest scores, providing a positive evaluation of the experience. On the other hand, the lowest score was obtained when the time devoted to the experience was evaluated, which may be due to the fact that the students are not familiar with the tools and they had to spend more time on the experience. To assess the experience, the relationships between the different factors were checked using the Pearson's linear correlation method (bivariate correlations). Table 6 shows the values of the coefficients and the significance. It is observed that AC was significantly related to CW. However, there was no significant relationship between CW and SB. On the other hand, the Pearson's correlation coefficient between AC and SB indicated that there was a very significant relationship between both factors. Furthermore, the level of significance leads to this conclusion. Therefore, it can be considered that the activities carried out had a great impact on both the collaborative work and the results on the subject. It should be noted that the activities were planned and based on different digital tools, and the essence of content curation is collaborative, so collaborative work was positively promoted through the tools. Moreover, the selection of tools and their use were successful. Collaborative management tools and content curation represent a great evolution in all the fields. Among the multiple advantages that they present, such as immediacy, efficiency, flexibility and process automation, the contribution that these tools make to the updating and learning skills are noteworthy, since this type of tools require constant training to be updated and to get better [37].