## 4 RFID Security Solutions
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline
**Authors and** & **Main Objective** & **Year** & **Country** & **Method Utilized** & **Discipline** \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{[PERSON] et al. [53]} & The usage of the IDEA cipher for an RGBI-based parsing & \multirow{6}{*}{2018} & \multirow{6}{*}{Indonesia Republic} & IDEA cipher & \multirow{6}{*}{Parking gate} \\  & application to identity, verify, and authenticating age with the & & & & (BAN) \\  & intention to improve the entire & & & & \\  & system’s security & & & & \\  & use usage of IDEA cipher for an RGBI-based parsing & \multirow{6}{*}{2017} & \multirow{6}{*}{[PERSON] et al. [56]} & \multirow{6}{*}{2018} & \multirow{6}{*}{Indonesia Republic} & \multirow{6}{*}{Burrows-Abadi-Needham} & \multirow{6}{*}{Parking gate} \\  & application to identity, verify, and authenticating age with the & & & & \\  & intention to improve the entire & & & & \\  & system’s security & & & & \\  & system’s security & & & & \\  & automaticization step with the & & & & \\  & information to improve the entire & & & & \\  & system’s security & & & & \\  & mutual authentication scheme & & & & \\  & & to secure RFID system & & & \\  & vominkous revisions & & & & \\  & signing, fusing, and changing for & & & & \\  & verification & & & & \\  & Applying the enhanced-TEA & & & & \\  & cyber to secure circuit & & & & \\  & bit-designing identification and & 2017 & Nigeria & Pseudo-random TEA & Healthcare \\  & tag from multiple-channel or & & & & \\  & dislabelled & & & & \\  & Suggested as NEC-based & & & & \\  & authentication scheme to secure & & & & \\  & RFID system active & & & & \\  & tracking attacks & & & & \\  & radio-frequency authentication & & & & \\  & scheme based on the usage of a & & & \\  & changing-response approach & & & & \\  & and AS cipher to protect tag & & & \\  & from unstructured identification & & & & \\  & and non-legitimating tracing & & & & \\  & [PERSON] et al. [41] & ASIS-26 algorithm to ensure data & 2017 & Indonesia & AES-128 Burrows-Abadi & Multi-discipline \\  & transmission privacy & & & & \\  & Proposed a low-cost mutual & & & & \\  & authentication that was built in. & 2017 & France & PRESENT & Parking gate \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: _Cont._To tackle this issue, the highly recommended AES-128 [30; 40; 41] can be used with a challenge-response scheme to prevent malicious accesses. [PERSON], [PERSON] et al. [11] tried to combine the Huffman code with the aforementioned algorithm to mitigate malicious intrusions that could threaten the NFC card's information. Moreover, [PERSON] et al. [13] applied the sixth version of [PERSON]'s code over AES or Blowfish (depending on the security needs) along with SHA-256 for authentication. On the other hand, [PERSON] et al. [32] implemented the fifth version of the same block cipher to be implemented for e-payment purposes. The TEA cipher is another block cipher algorithm that is considerably utilized, especially for healthcare applications [22; 29; 38], due to its low resource usage and healthcare applications' real-time information requirement. ECC can be seen as widely used, as in [14; 39], where this approach was implemented alongside several techniques such as the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA), SHA-256, and CRC, and it can be part of a blockchain-based e-payment application with no consensus, since the users are initially verified [23], or zero-knowledge- based cryptography within [PERSON]'s scheme [33]. At this level, ECC is used to moderate the size of the encrypted data. Further, challenge-response schemes are another kind of solution that can be applied where there are some resource limitations. These solutions are usually built in with the utilization of PRNG and CRC [15; 24]. Moreover, the dynamic keys concept was utilized in [16], where each card has its own unique key and access conditions.