## 5 Discussion  
This study provides a valuable contribution from both a scientific and social perspective, offering a deeper understanding of AI acceptance in education. Its findings can serve as a foundation for future research aimed at examining in greater detail the interaction between technology and learning. Additionally, it provides useful insights for educational institutions and academic policymakers, facilitating evidence-based decision-making regarding the implementation of training programs and the development of technological resources. Beyond its theoretical contributions, these findings have significant practical implications for educators seeking to integrate AI-driven tools like ChatGPT into their teaching methodologies. As one of the most advanced AI text-generation models, ChatGPT has the potential to support various aspects of education, including curriculum design, assessment, student engagement, and communication ([PERSON] and [PERSON]). Educators can leverage its capabilities to generate structured learning materials, assist with student writing, and even act as an interactive tool for inquiry-based learning. The ability of ChatGPT to provide instant feedback, facilitate brainstorming, and aid in comprehension makes it a valuable supplement to traditional pedagogical strategies ([PERSON]). One of the most transformative aspects of ChatGPT is its role in personalized learning and adaptive education. Unlike conventional static resources, ChatGPT enables students to engage in interactive conversations that cater to their specific needs and levels of understanding. It can generate contextualized examples, clarify concepts, and guide students through problem-solving processes in real time, thereby enhancing self-directed learning and metacognitive skills ([PERSON] and [PERSON]). Furthermore, it allows for dynamic assessment by generating practice questions, evaluating student responses, and offering individualized feedback, reinforcing knowledge acquisition in a way that aligns with modern competency-based education models ([PERSON] and [PERSON]). Additionally, ChatGPT's utility extends beyond student-centered learning; it also serves as an asset for instructors in curriculum planning and assessment design. The ability to streamline lesson planning, generate quizzes, and support rubric creation provides teachers with more time to focus on higher-order pedagogical tasks. Moreover, the integration of AI in education is reshaping administrative functions, allowing for institutions to optimize their resource allocation and instructional strategies ([PERSON]). The increasing reliance on AI in education calls for a redefinition of digital literacy programs, ensuring that students are equipped with the necessary critical thinking skills to assess AI-generated content, detect biases, and engage with AI ethically. Despite its advantages, the adoption of ChatGPT in education also presents challenges related to academic integrity, privacy concerns, and equitable access. While some educators embrace AI as a teachable agent that fosters deeper learning by encouraging students to teach concepts back to the AI, others remain concerned about its potential misuse \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **PE** & **EE** & **SI** & **FC** & **BI** \\ \hline Kruskal–Wallis H & 11.995 & 10.285 & 12.486 & 10.609 & 7.385 \\ df & 6 & 6 & 6 & 6 \\ Sig. & 0.062 & 0.113 & 0.052 & 0.101 & 0.287 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 11: Kruskal–Wallis test results for field of study. ([PERSON] and [PERSON]). Addressing these challenges requires clear institutional policies that delineate the ethical boundaries of AI-assisted learning while promoting its responsible and transparent use. Given the increasing role of AI in education, universities and policymakers must prioritize the development of AI literacy programs that equip students with the skills to effectively and responsibly engage with AI tools.