## 6 Experimental Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c} \hline
**Benchmark** & **Auto** & **One-Hot** & **JEDI** & _PTY_ & **Our Approach** & **Complexity** \\ \hline bbara & 113.496 & 113.496 & 119.727 & 106.456 & 104.152 & C1 \\ bbse & 99.049 & 103.713 & 108.539 & 102.428 & 100.766 & C1 \\ bbtas & 117.687 & 117.687 & 118.336 & 105.295 & 105.295 & C0 \\ beecount & 104.112 & 104.112 & 111.839 & 104.520 & 102.669 & C1 \\ cse & 94.713 & 101.626 & 107.030 & 104.488 & 102.422 & C1 \\ dk14 & 113.364 & 106.439 & 114.134 & 100.361 & 110.248 & C1 \\ dk15 & 113.675 & 111.137 & 114.487 & 101.111 & 111.002 & C1 \\ dk16 & 105.362 & 107.294 & 115.316 & 107.219 & 104.835 & C1 \\ dk17 & 116.049 & 104.308 & 116.049 & 103.982 & 103.982 & C0 \\ dk27 & 120.122 & 118.709 & 119.494 & 107.240 & 107.240 & C0 \\ dk512 & 116.740 & 116.740 & 117.963 & 104.537 & 104.537 & C0 \\ donfile & 110.706 & 110.696 & 117.517 & 126.323 & 131.093 & C1 \\ ex1 & 95.922 & 91.281 & 105.777 & 117.700 & 117.700 & C2 \\ ex2 & 115.808 & 115.808 & 116.340 & 104.540 & 102.692 & C1 \\ ex3 & 114.536 & 114.536 & 114.846 & 102.766 & 102.766 & C0 \\ ex4 & 108.530 & 107.352 & 112.690 & 102.621 & 100.991 & C1 \\ ex5 & 109.327 & 109.327 & 109.661 & 98.553 & 98.553 & C0 \\ ex6 & 104.556 & 102.333 & 107.183 & 103.082 & 101.394 & C1 \\ ex7 & 116.306 & 116.576 & 116.495 & 104.364 & 102.550 & C1 \\ keyb & 98.806 & 93.466 & 103.453 & 99.375 & 98.291 & C1 \\ kirkman & 91.148 & 96.232 & 97.272 & 94.152 & 97.084 & C2 \\ lion & 117.110 & 117.634 & 117.083 & 104.226 & 104.226 & C0 \\ lion9 & 118.065 & 111.136 & 118.421 & 106.080 & 106.080 & C0 \\ mark1 & 101.781 & 101.781 & 107.032 & 100.585 & 99.372 & C1 \\ mc & 115.102 & 114.694 & 115.174 & 103.221 & 103.221 & C0 \\ modulo12 & 120.454 & 120.454 & 120.498 & 107.505 & 107.505 & C0 \\ opus & 103.265 & 103.265 & 107.818 & 97.181 & 96.590 & C1 \\ planet & 88.777 & 88.777 & 110.222 & 101.038 & 102.132 & C2 \\ pma & 94.039 & 94.039 & 103.293 & 99.855 & 100.375 & C2 \\ s1 & 94.134 & 89.653 & 98.465 & 93.731 & 97.009 & C2 \\ s1488 & 90.800 & 87.934 & 98.472 & 96.960 & 97.101 & C2 \\ s1494 & 95.357 & 93.861 & 101.236 & 94.074 & 98.396 & C2 \\ s1a & 96.963 & 105.687 & 103.048 & 96.297 & 98.188 & C2 \\ s208 & 105.231 & 106.000 & 106.825 & 101.426 & 103.260 & C2 \\ s27 & 115.314 & 112.842 & 115.449 & 103.400 & 101.705 & C1 \\ s386 & 103.348 & 105.329 & 107.401 & 100.964 & 98.059 & C1 \\ s420 & 101.378 & 102.249 & 102.514 & 102.891 & 103.822 & C4 \\ s510 & 102.648 & 102.648 & 109.226 & 103.205 & 109.704 & C4 \\ s820 & 93.537 & 93.975 & 102.300 & 96.932 & 96.006 & C1 \\ s832 & 91.117 & 94.001 & 101.354 & 103.126 & 108.309 & C4 \\ s840 & 108.755 & 108.364 & 109.196 & 109.795 & 110.717 & C4 \\ sand & 80.711 & 80.711 & 85.821 & 90.949 & 91.784 & C3 \\ shiftreg & 120.454 & 137.645 & 141.028 & 113.612 & 113.612 & C0 \\ sse & 99.049 & 103.713 & 105.760 & 98.375 & 97.468 & C1 \\ styr & 90.359 & 86.979 & 93.754 & 86.657 & 85.867 & C2 \\ tma & 101.719 & 95.284 & 101.819 & 97.588 & 98.065 & C2 \\ \hline
**Sum** & 4918.26 & 4910.30 & 5157.58 & 4811.82 & 4840.96 & \\ \hline
**Percentage, \%** & 101.60 & 101.43 & 106.54 & 99.40 & 100.00 & \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 9: Experimental results (maximum operating frequency in MHz). Let us sum up some results of the comparison of equivalent \(P_{T}Y\) and \(P_{2T}Y\) FSMs. If FSMs have complexity C0, then there are the same values of basic characteristics for both models. For other levels of complexity, \(P_{2T}Y\) FSMs have better spatial characteristics (the