# Conceptual Framework for Implementing Temporal Big Data Analytics in Companies
## 6 Verification of the Proposed Conceptual Framework
### Participant Perspectives
#### 6.2.2 Outcome 2: Consistency of the Proposed Framework  
Question: _Does the presented framework consistently combine the following aspects: technological, analytical, strategic, and organizational?_  
The consistency of any solution is one of the most important conditions for its success in practice. In the area of implementing business IT solutions, it is therefore necessary to coherently combine organizational and technological issues. As the proposed framework is about business analytics, it must also consistently integrate strategy and analytics. The most outstanding utterances in the discussion were:  
_It all fits together._  
_A model of reality._  
_Model is consistent with model of implementing IT solutions._  
_As coherent as possible._  
_The solution is clear and consistent, but the details will do the difference._  
All the participants who addressed this question pointed out its consistency with regard to company, technology, business strategy, and big data analytics. The compliance of the proposed solution with generally accepted IT implementation standards was also underlined. However, one of the debaters expressed doubts about the requirements and performance indicators of the proposed framework. As for the latter, this issue will be addressed in question 4. As for the former, the requirements for the BDA implementation framework are indicated in Section 3 but were not included in the presentation to the focus group participants. The requirements for a specific TBDA implementation in a company will of course depend on business conditions, but it can be assumed that the coherence ofthe proposed framework and its basis on the TBDMM maturity model will allow for the formulation of consistent requirements for specific TBDA implementations.  
2.3 Outcome 3: The Use of Lean, Agile, and Leagile Concepts in the Framework as a Way to Capture the Temporality of BDA  
Question:_Is it justified to use agile, lean, and mixed (leagile) solutions in the proposed framework?_  
Lean, agile, and leagile approaches are--apart from temporality--a distinguishing feature of the proposed framework, hence the question of the legitimacy of their use. The most important notions:  
_Agile methodologies are a standard now._  
_Combination of lean and agile is very interesting._  
_Leagile approach in this framework is really a plus._  
_Lean, agile, and leagile methodologies improve the implementation of temporality._  
All the statements quoted above show a very positive reception of the lean, agile, and--especially--leagile concepts in the proposed framework. One participant even emphasized the relationship of these concepts with temporality. Therefore, it can be assumed that basing the TBDA implementation framework on a combination of lean and agile is a good solution.  
2.4 Outcome 4: The Correctness and Adequacy of the TBDA Implementation Efficiency Measures Proposed in the Framework  
Question:_Are the KPIs proposed in phase IV correct and adequate for the TBDA implementation task?_  
In the proposed conceptual framework, several measures of implementation success are proposed. The success/failure is assessed from four perspectives: financial, stakeholders/customers, business processes, and innovation perspectives. For each of the perspectives, a sample set of KPIs has been proposed. The respondents were asked to give their opinion on this point. The most outstanding citations:  
_Look like created by data scientists or by business._  
_It's advisable to start with a proof-of-concept to help define the KPIs._  
_Data science parameters should also be mapped to business KPIs._  
As seen from the above utterances, the proposed set of KPIs is generally assessed as correct because it addresses several business perspectives. However, it should be noted that while implementing the proposed framework in companies, there will be the need to consult KPIs and measures of effectiveness with a specific business. Probably doing a proof-of-concept would be helpful to managers to draw case-specific KPIs.