## 3 Results and Discussion
### Force Distribution Due to Column Loss in Beams Next to Column Removal
As shown in Figure 20 and tabulated in Table 5, case 8 has the highest shear force, and its lowest shear force is related to case 7 with a value of \(-\)2622.87 N. In the case of bending moment, when it is proven after the oscillation, the highest bending moment is related to case 4; however, the lowest is related to case 7 and its value is 20,838.58 N.  
As shown in Figure 21 and depicted in Table 6, after removing the first-floor column, the results show that the highest axial force in the case of Case 4 is with the \(-\)1,009,521 N value, whereas the lowest in case of Case 6 is that of 18,863.2 N in the case of flexural anchor, is the most applied force associated with Case 5 and the lowest in case of Case 7. As shown in Figure 22 and Table 7, after removing the column in the 6 th floor, the maximum axial force created in the column in case 3 is \(-\)594,235 N, while in the shear force created in the column, the maximum is related to case 2, and in the case of bending moment, most of it is related to case 2, although it has good performance in some members and has enhances improved the chain performance as well as the forces in the members. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Type**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Shear (N)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Moment (Nm)**} \\ \cline{2-5}  & **Max** & **Constant** & **Max** & **Constant** \\ \hline Case 1 & \(-\)1860.2 & \(-\)42,805 & 137,632 & 23,002.7 \\ Case 2 & \(-\)4208.8 & \(-\)21,984 & 126,347 & 78,079.4 \\ Case 3 & \(-\)26,358 & \(-\)45,391 & \(-\)23,574 & \(-\)26,477 \\ Case 4 & \(-\)4254.7 & \(-\)20,611 & 1,242,119 & 802,693 \\ Case 5 & \(-\)3646.9 & \(-\)3646.9 & 127,990 & 127,990 \\ Case 6 & \(-\)6524.5 & \(-\)6524.5 & 115,720 & 115,720 \\ Case 7 & \(-\)1857.7 & \(-\)1857.7 & 137,318 & 137,318 \\ Case 8 & 71,997.3 & 26,287.7 & 304,069 & 175,567 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Result force story 6 for element 123. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Type**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Shear (N)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Moment (Nm)**} \\ \cline{2-5}  & **Max** & **Constant** & **Max** & **Constant** \\ \hline Case 1 & \(-\)954.38 & \(-\)41,857 & 137,747 & \(-\)4271.2 \\ Case 2 & \(-\)2409.6 & \(-\)23,488 & 129,084 & \(-\)2396.7 \\ Case 3 & \(-\)25,662 & \(-\)40,876 & \(-\)11,803 & \(-\)4171 \\ Case 4 & \(-\)2531.8 & \(-\)23,531 & 128,930 & \(-\)2401.2 \\ Case 5 & \(-\)2031.4 & \(-\)2044.9 & 130,093 & \(-\)208.66 \\ Case 6 & \(-\)3693 & \(-\)3693 & 125,379 & \(-\)376.84 \\ Case 7 & \(-\)1123.5 & \(-\)1123.5 & 132,357 & \(-\)114.65 \\ Case 8 & 91,115 & 39,827 & 345,480 & 4063.98 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Result force story 1 for element 118. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Type**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Shear (N)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Moment (Nm)**} \\ \cline{2-5}  & **Max** & **Constant** & **Max** & **Constant** \\ \hline Case 1 & \(-\)2625.25 & \(-\)43,752.4 & 137,480.4 & 20,838.6 \\ Case 2 & \(-\)24,073.4 & \(-\)33,571.7 & 28,612.19 & 4591.762 \\ Case 3 & \(-\)26,772.2 & \(-\)19,694.6 & \(-\)24,506.6 & \(-\)38,748.3 \\ Case 4 & \(-\)7316.24 & \(-\)19,694.6 & 118,550.3 & 80,526.13 \\ Case 5 & \(-\)5218.5 & \(-\)5218.5 & 126,341.4 & 126,341.4 \\ Case 6 & \(-\)5199.03 & \(-\)5199.03 & 126,519.3 & 126,519.3 \\ Case 7 & \(-\)2622.87 & \(-\)43,7 Figure 21: Column behavior after column removal in story one: (**a**) axial force, (**b**) shear, and (**c**) moment.