## 1 Introduction
### Methodology  
Our study explores the potential for a neighborhood residential community that includes both conventional and smart dwellings, as well as an energy storage unit. Smart houses generally have energy storage systems (i.e., batteries (BT)). They allow customers to sell any excess energy to a power station while simultaneously acquiring shares at the market price in real-time. Families that are not on the market can purchase electricity from the power pool at lower costs than the retail market [29]. When smart home solar panels are installed, any excess energy may be sold to the energy pool at a price greater than the feed-in tariff (FinT). Decentralized agents negotiate the purchase and sale of energy to the pool. Moreover, instead of selling electricity back to their retailer at the grid's contracted rate, people can sell the extra electricity they produce (using solar panels, for example) to others--another advantage of the peer-to-peer concept. In addition, market  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt} p{113.8 pt}} \hline \hline
**P2P Market** & **Advantages** & **Limits** & **References** \\ \hline Decentralized market-(**DeMark**) & Interaction and conversation between individual customers directly. There is no obligation to exchange data with other parties, which enhances user privacy. Increased scalability, with customers able to join the P2P marketplace whenever they wish. & It will be more difficult to achieve the highest possible overall revenue. It may be difficult to keep track of decentralized users. & [40; 41; 42; 43; 44], decentralized users. \\ \hline Centralized market-(**Ce-Mark**) & A centralized market revolves around the market coordinator, who directly determines the number of inputs and products and distributes the benefits among the many users, achieving the highest possible level of social well-being through the microgrid. Simple management. Complete democratization of the use of available energy sources. & Because of the sharing of food data, customer privacy may be compromised. Optimization aims to maximize overall benefits, which may mean ignoring specific user requirements to achieve this objective. & [19; 20; 21; 22; 23], maximize overall benefits, which may mean ignoring specific user requirements to achieve this objective. \\ \hline Distributed market-(DiMark) & In a distributed market, the market coordinator exercises indirect control over user energy exchanges and regulates user behavior through price signals. Distributed markets are halfway between centralized and decentralized markets. A system that can indirectly influence the behavior of users while preserving their privacy and individuality. & In determining market pricing signals, account must be taken of user behavior, actual market processes, and the need to minimize the negative consequences of market dispersion. & [25; 26; 27; 28; 29; 30; 31; 32; 33; 34; 35; 36; 37; 38; 39]. \\ \hline
**Our Approach-(DeMark)** & **Customers/prosumers can enter the P2P market at any time, improving adaptability.** & Discussions & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: The three P2P market approaches described above.  
players can choose the electricity purchase and sale tariffs they consider reasonable. In this article, \"end users\", or \"users\", refers to both those who produce and consume energy. This covers both those who create and those who consume energy. Figure 1 illustrates the methodology used for this study. The descriptive research examines individuals' interests and goals in peer-to-peer energy markets. To achieve this, an online survey using an ELD is undertaken to discover respondents' preferences in various areas of energy. For various reasons, digital communication equipment was considered an acceptable solution for assessing user preferences. As it is an implicit method of calculating preferences, it removes the incentive to provide potentially incorrect but socially acceptable answers.