## 3 Results  
In Tables 3 and 4, we present the main results of our study and the main statistical parameters of pre and post-tests. In Table 3, we have shown the results achieved for the tests of sprinting and jumping. In this reflection of the results, the speed of 30 m showed an improvement in time in the group that followed the pylemetric program (PG). The test result pre-experiment in the pre-measurements was (4.94 \(\pm\) 0.446), while the test result post the experiment in the post-measurements was (4.59 \(\pm\) 0.449), which means that we have a value difference ([PERSON]'s d = \(-\)1.166, Effect-size = 0.53, \(p\) < 0.014), also the speed 80 m showed time improvement in the pylemetric group (PG), the test result pre the experiment in the pre measurements was (11.55 \(\pm\) 1.38) while the test result post the experiment in the post measurements \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Test**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Group**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Test**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Mean \(\pm\) St. Dev**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Cohen’s d**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Effect-Size**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\(p\) Value (Pre vs. Post-Training)**} \\  & & & & & **Post-** & **Post-** & **Post-** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{S30 m speed} & \multirow{2}{*}{CG} & Pre & 4.94 \(\pm\) 0.446 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)1.166} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.53} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.014} \\  & & Post & 5.66 \(\pm\) 0.750 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Pre & 4.77 \(\pm\) 0.528 & & & \\  & PG & Post & 4.59 \(\pm\) 0.449 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{S80 m speed} & \multirow{2}{*}{CG} & Pre & 11.81 \(\pm\) 1.38 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0351} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.173} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.070} \\  & & Post & 12.31 \(\pm\) 1.46 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Pre & 11.55 \(\pm\) 1.36 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Post & 11.20 \(\pm\) 1.19 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{S100 m speed} & \multirow{2}{*}{CG} & Pre & 15.48 \(\pm\) 1.82 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.201} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.100} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.019} \\  & & Post & 15.82 \(\pm\) 1.54 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Pre & 14.99 \(\pm\) 1.71 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Post & 14.44 \(\pm\) 1.36 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{SBJ} & \multirow{2}{*}{CG} & Pre & 194.81 \(\pm\) 28.14 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)1.112} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.486} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.000} \\  & & Post & 225.33 \(\pm\) 27.41 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Pre & 196.44 \(\pm\) 27.47 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Post & 266.53 \(\pm\) 26.74 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{SLJ} & \multirow{2}{*}{CG} & Pre & 498.74 \(\pm\) 56.45 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.919} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.417} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.000} \\  & & Post & 548.65 \(\pm\) 51.98 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Pre & 502.64 \(\pm\) 56.38 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Post & 621.54 \(\pm\) 51.59 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{VJT} & \multirow{2}{*}{CG} & Pre & 32.01 \(\pm\) 5.76 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.935} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.423} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.000} \\  & & Post & 37.03 \(\pm\) 4.94 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Pre & 32.05 \(\pm\) 5.59 & & & \\ \cline{2-6}  & & Post & 49.94 \(\pm\) 4.84 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Legendra: CG--control group; PG--plyometric group; S--print run; SBJ--Standing long jump; (STJ)-Standing triple jump; (VJT)--Vertical Jump; Mean--Arithmetic mean; Std. Dev.—Standard deviation; Significant differences \(p\)-value < 0.05.} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{} \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-6}  & & Pre & 32.05 \(\pm\) 5.59 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)3.421} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.863} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.000} \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-6}  & & Post & 49.94 \(\pm\) 4.84 & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Descriptive statistics of the tests for both groups of study. was (11.20 \(\pm\) 1.19), which means that we have a significant difference ([PERSON]'s d = 0.273, Effect-size = 0.135, \(p\) < 0.028).