## 5 Result Analysis and Discussion
### Analytical Insights and Discussion (Unveiling the Findings)
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{\multirow{2}{*}{MethodIndices}} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Operating Cost (\$)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Losses (\&W)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Voltage Deviation (pu)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**(EENS) (\&W)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**VSI (pu)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Sum of Short-Circuit-Level Changes (pu)**} \\ \cline{5-6} \multicolumn{1}{c}{Proposed method} & & & & & & \\ \hline
[2,3] & 185.21 & 21.12 & 2.35 & 68.21 & 4.21 & 8.51 \\
[2,3] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline
[7,10] & 1712.31 & 16.32 & 6.31 & 38.54 & 1.24 & 10.24 \\
[7,7] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline
[14,19] & 1471.14 & 18.25 & 3.98 & 48.56 & 2.94 & 11.71 \\
[7] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Comparison between the proposed method and other state-of-the-art approaches in the context of the IEEE 69-bus network. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{\multirow{2}{*}{MethodIndices}} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Operating Cost (\$)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Losses (\&W)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Voltage Deviation (pu)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**(EENS) (\&W)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**VSI (pu)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Sum of Short-Circuit-Level Changes (pu)**} \\ \cline{5-6} \multicolumn{1}{c}{Proposed method} & & & & & & \\ \hline
[2,3] & 5061.28 & 3.21 & 2.63 & 63.21 & 1.23 & 1.24 \\
[7,7] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline
[7,10] & 4716.25 & 4.612 & 3.83 & 59.32 & 0.68 & 5.28 \\
[7,7] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline
[14,19] & 4781.21 & 8.241 & 0.81 & 71.23 & 0.94 & 3.67 \\
[7] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Comparison between the proposed method and other state-of-the-art approaches in the context of the IEEE 33-bus network. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{\multirow{2}{*}{MethodObjectives}} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Operating Cost (\$)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Losses (\&W)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Voltage Deviation (pu)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**(EENS) (\&W)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**VSI (pu)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Sum of Short-Circuit-Level Changes (pu)**} \\ \cline{5-6} \multicolumn{1}{c}{Proposed method} & & & & & & \\ \hline
[2,3] & 18,452.63 & 6.62 & 6.791 & 114.21 & 5.32 & 4.25 \\
[7] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline
[7,10] & 24,384.21 & 8.274 & 5.217 & 87.64 & 4.28 & 6.54 \\
[7] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline
[14,19] & 21,628.64 & 11.427 & 1.87 & 314.21 & 7.81 & 12.37 \\
[7] & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) & \(\bigtriangleup\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Comparison between the proposed method and other state-of-the-art approaches in the context of the IEEE 118-bus network. reliability and power quality with economic considerations such as operational efficiency and generation costs.