# Intelligent Traffic Model for Unmanned Ground Vehicles Based on DSDV-AODV Protocol
## 2 Method
### Dsdv-Aodv
#### 2.3.1 Work Mechanism of the Protocol
These results are shown in Table 6.

#### 3.1.3 The Third Scenario

This section explains the variations in each parameter's findings from two scenarios with the same structure but different routing strategies. These scenarios are as follows:

1. The scenario in which the network contains 500 fixed nodes. The DSDV-AODV best results are QoS = 69.8, delay = 0.00142, and throughput = 74.1. 2. The scenario that has a structure made up of 500 fixed nodes and 500 mobile nodes. The DSDV-AODV best results are QoS = 342.5, delay = 0.00133, and throughput = 372.3. These results are shown in Table 7. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **(a) 50 Fixed Nodes** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**(b) 50 Fixed Nodes + 50 Mobile Nodes**} \\ \hline
**AODV** & **DSDV** & **DSDV-AODV** & **AODV** & **DSDV** & **DSDV-AODV** \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{QoS parameter (kbps)} \\ \hline
5.2 & 6.2 & 3.67 & 16.49 & 17.2 & 9.42 \\
103.7 & 107.1 & 118.9 & 147.1 & 152.1 & 180.5 \\
107.8 & 112.6 & **126.1** & 144.29 & 153.9 & **192.47** \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{Delay parameter (second)} \\ \hline
0.00173 & 0.00180 & 0.00169 & 0.00267 & 0.0025 & 0.00026 \\
0.00194 & 0.00198 & 0.00190 & 0.00140 & 0.00141 & 0.00078 \\
0.00183 & 0.00178 & **0.00168** & 0.00167 & 0.00157 & **0.00062** \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{Throughput parameter (kbps)} \\ \hline
18.68 & 20.81 & 49.4 & 5.3 & 8.3 & 12.7 \\
158.9 & 161.7 & 282.6 & 135.3 & 138.1 & 139.6 \\
156.5 & 168.3 & **260.53** & 111.39 & 117.39 & **130.8** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Scenario 02 results. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **(a) 20 Fixed Nodes** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**(b) 20 Fixed Nodes + 20 Mobile Nodes**} \\ \hline
**AODV** & **DSDV** & **DSDV-AODV** & **AODV** & **DSDV** & **DSDV-AODV** \\ \hline
44.19 & 45.19 & 32.208 & 95.8 & 44.19 & 62 \\
412.96 & 417.96 & 741.162 & 665.2 & 472.96 & 719.9 \\
402.63 & 432.3 & 629.437 & 578.7 & 582.63 & 627.49 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Scenario 01 results: Throughput parameter (kbps). ### Result Comparison and Analysis

The behavior of the routing protocol and the average value of each employed metric parameter may be seen from all of the comparison analyses in Section 3.1. The DSDV-AODV routing protocol performs significantly better in nearly every measure across the range. Table 7 demonstrates that the DSDV-AODV delay improves the AODV delay in every circumstance. However, there are some situations where the AODV routing protocol is better than DSDV-AODV for network QoS. In addition to throughput characteristics, DSDV-AODV improves AODV in several scenarios and has a greater throughput. We can determine how each direction will behave in the present environment based on the simulation results that were acquired. The results of each parameter are impacted by the inclusion of mobile nodes, as indicated in Table 7. A mobile node in the scenario reduces the stated delay result in the delay parameter. The smallest average delay, as seen in scenario 02, is 0.00062 s. Additionally, adding mobile nodes to the scenario increases the result value of QoS parameter. Increasing the number of mobile nodes has the effect of improving the results for the throughput metric. Nearly all cases with low delay settings result in high throughput numbers, as shown in Table 8. In addition, the overall simulation results show that the second scenario using 50 fixed nodes + 50 mobile nodes has the best results. Additionally, the results of the total simulation suggest that the second scenario, which uses 50 fixed nodes and 50 movable nodes, produces the best outcomes.