# The Need for Machine-Processable Agreements in Health Data Management +
## 5 A Policy Language for Multi-Privilege Consent
### Conflict Detection
These are described in Section 6. This section presented an in depth review of related work on data sharing policies and machine-enforceable contracts. As described in Section 3, a large number of policy languages already exist, and run the gamut of implementation languages, how they are attached to the data and important privacy scenarios. We map related approaches and identify their disadvantages to the use cases we have identified as important in this domain in Section 6. While there is no clear previous policy language that is an immediate fit for the concerns expressed in this work, we would like to consider the use of \"obligations\" as used by many privacy languages, particularly for the use of the hospital data controller who is not represented within the stakeholders of this work. In this case, obligations would need to be considered when evaluating conflicts; some conflicts would disappear as sharing would be deemed unacceptable. In the future we will extend our current work to build a fully fledged language to capture agreements, preferences, policies, and consent in health data sharing and deploy this in our developing ontology-based framework. **Author Contributions** Conceptualization, G.K., A.C., M.J.W., L.M.B. and A.M.L. ; Methodology, G.K., A.C., M.J.W and L.M.B. ; Software, A.A. and L.M.B. ; Validation, A.C., M.J.W., A.A. and L.M.B. ; Formal analysis, G.K., A.C., M.J.W. ; Investigation, G.K., A.C., M.J.W., L.M.B. and A.M.L. ; Resources, G.K., A.C., M.J.W., L.M.B. and A.M.L. ; Data curation, A.C., M.J.W. and A.A.; Writing--original draft preparation, G.K., A.C., M.J.W., A.A. and L.M.B. ; Writing--review and editing, G.K., A.C., M.J.W., L.M.B. and A.M.L. ; Visualization, A.C., M.J.W., A.A. and L.M.B. ; Supervision, G.K., A.C., M.J.W., L.M.B. and A.M.L. ; Project administration, G.K., A.C., M.J.W., L.M.B. and A.M.L. ; Funding acquisition, G.K., M.J.W., A.C., L.M.B. and A.M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. **Funding**: [PERSON] was supported by an Alan Turing Institute Fellowship. [PERSON] was supported by ESRC grant number ES/R009058/1. [PERSON] was supported by an ECS Centre for Health Technologies undergraduate internship. [PERSON] was funded by a Research Fellowship from Health Education England Genomics Education Programme and the Wessex Innovation Fund. [PERSON] is co-lead for the Data Science cross cutting theme of the NIHIR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre and holds a Wellcome Trust Collaborative award in ethics and society

**Acknowledgments:** The authors thank [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] for their development and maintenance efforts on myKinMatters. **Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest. ## References

* (1) [PERSON]; [PERSON] Alerting relatives about heritable risks: The limits of confidentiality. _BMJ_**2018**, _361_, k1409. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* (2) [PERSON] The Need for Data Sharing Agreements in Data Management. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Semantic Web Technologies for Health Data Management, Auckland, New Zealand, 26 October 2019. * (3) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Family Communication in a Population at Risk for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. _J. Genet Couns._**2015**, _24_, 336-348. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* (4) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] Testing Participation in BRCA1/2-Positive Families: Initiator Role of Index Cases. _Genet. Test._**2003**, \(7\), 225-233. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* (5) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Factors Determining Dissemination of Results and Uptake of Genetic Testing in Families with Known BRCA1/2 Mutations. _Genet. Test._**2008**, _12_, 81-91.