## 4 Evaluation
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Metric**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Path**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**H**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**B**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**D**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**PL**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Data Rate**} \\  & & **(Hops)** & **(Mops)** & **(ms)** & **(ms)** & **(0-1)** & **(Mbps)** \\ \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\(H\)} & H1-S14-S6-S2-S1-R1-R16-R31-R46-R61-R76-R91-R106-R121- & \multirow{2}{*}{24} & \multirow{2}{*}{78} & \multirow{2}{*}{130} & \multirow{2}{*}{5.5 \(\times\) 10\({}^{-3}\)} & \multirow{2}{*}{23.8} \\  & R136-R151-R166-R181-R196-S22-S26-S32-S38-S44-H14 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{\(B\)} & H1-S14-S6-S2-S1-R1-R16-R31-R45-R46-R59-R72-R73-R86- & \multirow{5}{*}{42} & \multirow{5}{*}{86} & \multirow{5}{*}{166} & \multirow{5}{*}{3.7 \(\times\) 10\({}^{-3}\)} & \multirow{5}{*}{38} \\  & R101-R11-R12-R12-R12-R155-R166-R171-R172-R187- & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{3-5}  & R174-R161-R147-R162-R163-R164-R178-R193-R180-R181- & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{3-5}  & R196-S2-S24-S32-S37-R31-R38-S44-H14 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{\(D\)} & H1-S14-S7-S3-R1-R16-R31-R46-R33-R47-R62-R77-R91- & \multirow{5}{*}{58} & \multirow{5}{*}{2.6 \(\times\) 10\({}^{-3}\)} & \multirow{5}{*}{53.5} \\  & R106-R13-R13-R16-R16-R179-R180-R196-S22-S24- & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{3-5}  & S30-S37-S44-H14 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{PL} & H1-S14-S7-S5-S1-R1-R2-R3-R17-R30-R43-S58-S7-R72-R85- & \multirow{5}{*}{35} & \multirow{5}{*}{74} & \multirow{5}{*}{138} & \multirow{5}{*}{0} & \multirow{5}{*}{63.1} \\  & R99-R14-R128-R14-R14-R15-R160-R174-R189-R191-R192- & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{3-5}  & R193-R194-R195-R196-S22-S26-S32-S37-S44-H14 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{\(w_{\text{B,D,PL}}\)} & H1-S14-S7-S5-S1-R1-R2-R17-R32-R47-R48-R62-R77-R90- & \multirow{5}{*}{34} & \multirow{5}{*}{79} & \multirow{5}{*}{85} & \multirow{5}{*}{3 \(\times\) 10\({}^{-3}\)} & \multirow{5}{*}{64.4} \\  & R104-R103-R116-R131-R146-R147-R16-R177-R192-R193- & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{3-5}  & R194-R195-R22-S24-S28-S35-S30-S37-S44-H14 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{\(\text{MOCCell}\)} & H1-S14-S7-S5-S1-R1-R15-R20-R14-R57-R27-R86-R85-R100- & \multirow{5}{*}{33} & \multirow{5}{*}{79} & \multirow{5}{*}{2 \(\times\) 10\({}^{-3}\)} & \multirow{5}{*}{66.9} \\  & R115-R130-R117-R118-R133-R148-R149-R164-R164-R179-R194-R194-R195-R196-S22-S24- & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{3-5}  & R195-R196-S22-S24-S28-S35-S30-S37-S44-H14 & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{5}{*}{MOEA/D} & H1-S14-S7-S5-S1-R1-R2-R3-R18-R33-R48-R63-R98-R92-R107- & \multirow{5}{*}{31} & \multirow{5}{*}{79} & \multirow{5}{*}{80} & \multirow{5}{*}{2 \(\times\) 10\({}^{-3}\)} & \multirow{5}{*}{66.37} \\  & R121-R134-R149-R164-R178-R193-R194-R195-R196-S22-S24- & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{3-5}  & S28-S35-S30-S37-S44-H14 & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Results of routing paths and network parameters. Figure 8: Evaluation of the path capacity using TCP traffic. The paths were selected according to the following methods: **(a)**\(H\) (hops), **(b)**\(B\) (bandwidth), **(c)**\(D\) (delay), and **(d)**\(PL\) (packet loss). Each test was performed under the same conditions as the experiment, where the total availability of the network was used for path selection according to the parameters in Tables A1-A3 from Appendix A. The following steps were defined for the execution of the test:  
* Design and execute the network topology with three domains (A, B, and C) and an external controller per domain. * Execute network performance tests between the end nodes with IPERF according to the optimization parameter. * Transfer the traffic during the specified period. * Repeat the experiment using data stream forwarding according to the optimization parameter. * Obtain results. An inter-domain approach was used to evaluate the data flow performance between two hosts.