## 2 Literature Review
The authors also maintain that cyberawareness challenges are global and should involve teachers, parents, students, and governmental entities. They also argue that media (e.g., television and radio) have a key role in awareness campaigns regarding cybersecurity, especially directed to students. The measure of the level of understanding and awareness for cybersecurity was proposed by [PERSON] et al. [20]. The authors measure the public motivation, government policy, educational system, labor market, and the digital divide. The authors assess and classify the literacy level into the following five key factors, considered as essential to the development of digital literacy in a wide set of countries: Governmental politics in terms of cybersecurity, the commitment of the schools to enhance the digital literacy of the population, and cyberawareness in the enterprises. Enterprises also have general concerns regarding cyberawareness among their employees. [PERSON] and [PERSON] [21] conclude that enterprises which have adopted cybersecurity measures solely by implementing technological processes were not able to have a better level of security. According to the authors, the human factor in cybersecurity is not adequately considered in enterprises. In [22] the authors evaluate the relationship between individuals' consciousness and the Information Security Awareness (ISA) model. The authors used the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q), which is based on a Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors (KAB) model. Consciousness, sympathy, emotional stability, and propensity to take risks are identified by the authors as key factors to explain the variance in individuals. The findings obtained with the questionnaire in the enterprises were important to identify strengths and weaknesses regarding cyberawareness, as well as to define training actions. The individuals' attitudes and behaviors towards the cybersecurity were studied by [PERSON] [6]. The major findings try to explain the way individuals' attitudes and behaviors, as well as Internet addiction and impulsivity, are intrinsically related to the cybersecurity risks taken in the organizations. The author evaluated these issues with four online questionnaires, namely \"ABbreviated Impulsiveness Scale\" (ABIS), \"Online Cognition Scale\" (OCS), \"Risky Cybersecurity Behaviors Scale\" (RScB), and \"Attitudes Towards Cybersecurity and Cybercrime in Business\" (ATC-IB). The major findings are as follows: Attitudes towards cybersecurity were negatively correlated with the individuals' involvement in risky behaviors; Internet addiction and impulsiveness are directly related to risky behaviors. Regarding the impact of cyberawareness in Small-Medium Enterprises (SME), [PERSON] et al. [23] and [PERSON] et al. [24] have pointed out the key factors and the cyberawareness best practices that should be adopted in this type of organization. In healthcare institutions, [PERSON] et al. [25] evaluated the cybersecurity awareness level of health practitioners in hospitals and identified the associated risk. Two questionnaires derived from Hadlington's ATC-IB and RScB scales were used to evaluate the cybersecurity risk faced by these professionals, according to the measured attitudes and behaviors taken online. In a wide scope, which embraces enterprises, SME, public institutions and individuals, ENISA's cybersecurity culture guidelines report [26] details the human aspects of cybersecurity and the existing research behind \"behavior science\", which includes a wide range of multidisciplinary disciplines. According to the report, cybernetics threats exist in all organizations, but they are recurrently seen as a technical problem, underestimating the human factor. Communication issues, regarding cybersecurity maintenance in organizations, are detailed by [PERSON] et al. [27]. The authors highlight that the user's role is emphasized by keeping cybersecurity but is barely recognized by IT teams.