## 3 Results and Discussion
### Analysis of Variance and Multivariate Analyses
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Sources of** & **Df** & **F1** & **F2** & **F3** & **F4** & **F5** & **F6** & **F7** & **F8** & **F9** & **F10** \\ \hline Replicates & 2 & 0.006 \({}^{m}\) & 0.060 \({}^{\ast}\) & 0.082 \({}^{m}\) & 0.293 \({}^{m}\) & 0.011 \({}^{m}\) & 0.044 \({}^{m}\) & 0.241 \({}^{m}\) & 0.001 \({}^{m}\) & 0.0017 \({}^{m}\) & 0.0009 \({}^{m}\) \\ Genotype & 8 & 0.052 \({}^{m}\) & 0.143 \({}^{m}\) & 0.401 \({}^{m}\) & 1.43 \({}^{m}\) & 0.106 \({}^{m}\) & 0.337 \({}^{m}\) & 0.090 \({}^{m}\) & 0.0009 \({}^{m}\) & 0.0021 \({}^{m}\) & 0.0049 \({}^{m}\) \\ Total error & 26 & 0.034 & 0.016 & 0.027 & 0.151 & 0.045 & 0.044 & 0.057 & 0.0009 \({}^{m}\) & 0.0012 & 0.0007 \\ \hline
**Sources of** & **Df** & **F11** & **F12** & **F13** & **F14** & **F15** & **F16** & **F16** \\ \hline Replicates & 2 & 0.0010 \({}^{\ast}\) & 67.70 \({}^{m}\) & 0.022 \({}^{m}\) & 0.014 \({}^{m}\) & 24.65 \({}^{m}\) & 0.004 \({}^{m}\) & \\ Genotype & 8 & 0.0004 \({}^{m}\) & 94.53 \({}^{\ast}\) & 0.009 \({}^{m}\) & 0.0027 \({}^{\ast}\) & 124.80 \({}^{m}\) & 0.009 \({}^{\ast}\) & \\ Total error & 26 & 0.0002 & 25.28 & 0.0016 & 0.0010 & 49.99 & 0.0031 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \({}^{\ast}\), \({}^{\ast\ast\ast}\) and ns are respectively significant at the 5\(\%\), 1\(\%\) probability level and the absence of significant difference.  
\end{table} 
Table 6: Analysis of variance (mean squares) morphological traits. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Genotype** & **Bud Length** & **Bud Dameter** & **Power Diameter** & **Petal Width** & **Day Weight of Semi-Open** & **The Number of Petals** & **Reseptacle Length (cm)** & **Reseptacle Diameter** & **Quantant Yield** \\ \hline A104 & 1.71 \({}^{abc}\) & 2.11 \({}^{a}\) & 5.59 \({}^{a}\) & 2.40 \({}^{a}\) & 0.32 \({}^{a}\) & 46.66 \({}^{b}\) & 0.95 \({}^{a}\) & 0.47 \({}^{b}\) & 0.75 \({}^{a}\) \\ A105 & 1.79 \({}^{ab}\) & 1.33 \({}^{cd}\) & 5.60 \({}^{a}\) & 2.43 \({}^{a}\) & 0.18 \({}^{c}\) & 50 \({}^{ab}\) & 0.94 \({}^{a}\) & 0.50 \({}^{ab}\) & 0.75 Based on yield-related traits obtained in the previous assays in the studied cultivars (Table 1) and new metabolite analyses, the D234 cultivar can be suggested as a promising cultivar with high yield, high C/G content and high rose oxide and can be introduced for further industrial cultivation. The second cultivar, A105, has a relatively high yield and high aroma quality with a high C/G ratio and rose oxide. Multivariate analyses were also performed for flavonoids in rose petals. Based on cluster analysis, two major groups were obtained in which D234 and C294 were classified in group 2 with high amounts of biochain A and diosmetin, and the other cultivars were classified in group 1 (Figure 3). Group 1, divided into two subgroups, included B111, A105, A104, and B215 with low amount of chalcone. Subgroup 2 consisted of C193, C251, and D237 with a high amount of chalcone and a moderate amount of diosmetin. Interestingly, D234 and C294 were the most valuable cultivars in terms of flavonoids. For this point of view, both cultivars can be introduced for further breeding programs and industrial cultivation as they also have high yields based on previous results (Table 1).