###### Abstract
It is also common for these players to complete video analyses of previous training and games, with players known to engage in preview and review sessions from a performance analysis perspective pre- and post-competitive match-play. Therefore, a balance needs to be found between increased training requirements and recovery for these amateur players to ensure that improvements in physical, physiological, technical, and tactical adaptations take place across any playing squad for the duration of a season. This has resulted in a proliferation of professional support staff and backroom team members being added to LGF squads in recent times [2; 3; 4]. Indeed, these staff aim to provide detailed analysis across various aspects of performance, such as skill execution, training load, wellness, strength diagnostics, and locomotor performance. This analysis helps develop an individualised training regimen, related to individualised athletic development programmes, modifications to training durations, modifications to training drills for specific players, additional locomotor top-ups where required, additional recovery strategies, individualised rehabilitation programmes, tailored periodisation strategies, and increased nutritional support for the players to ensure peak performance across the competitive season [2; 3; 4; 6; 8]. The process of developing an individualised training regimen is one that is typically reverse-engineered from the match-play requirements of any sport [3; 4]. However, due to a lack of research focusing on the locomotor requirements of LGF match-play, the many coaching teams within LGF rely on personal judgement or anecdotal experiences when prescribing individualised training regimen [3; 4]. This approach can at times disregard scientific rationale [3; 4; 9]. Anecdotally, coaches can infer the locomotor requirements of LGF from other team sports or from the male version of the sport, assuming similarities between the locomotion characteristics of these alternative sporting codes [3; 8; 10]. However, the application of these pracises may lead to suboptimal player preparation to meet the locomotor requirements of match-play. Therefore, there is a need for increased research interest in these locomotor profiles within the sport [2; 3; 4]. The requirement for data-informed processes within the LGF training process has increased across the last number of seasons; this has resulted in an increase in monitoring practises within the LGF training process [11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16]. Indeed, it is common for performance staff within LGF teams to monitor internal (heart rate, session RPE) and external (game time, training duration, locomotor performance through GPS) loads across the training and match-play environments [4]. This has resulted in the first investigations with respect to the locomotor requirements of match-play. The previous literature on LGF match-play has shown that players have an average locomotor profile of 7319 \(\pm\) 1021 m, with a locomotor intensity range of 116 \(\pm\) 9 m\(\cdot\)min\({}^{-1}\), with 20.6 \(\pm\) 5.4% of the game played above the designated arbitrary high-speed threshold of \(\geq\)4.4 m\(\cdot\)s\({}^{-1}\)[3]. Position analysis has further shown that the middle three positional lines, which consist of half-backs, midfielders, and half-forwards, exhibit the highest locomotor profile [3]. These positions also experience the largest decrease in locomotion across halves of play. These variations in locomotion and positional differences are attributed to the technical and tactical requirements of match-play [1; 3; 8; 10]. While these findings represent progress for coaches within the LGF training process, they mark only the beginning of further exploration [2]. Coaches and performance staff are currently analysing the locomotor requirements of LGF matches by breaking them down into smaller epochs, such as quarters of play and duration-specific running performances.