## 3 Correlation and Implementation
### Intelligent Compaction System Measurements  
To measure the CMV value for the compaction information, it is important to test the feasibility of the developed intelligent compaction system. The roller was operated at a 4 km/hr speed with 30-32 Hz to reciprocate a 10 m distance. The first objective was to \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{3}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Compaction** \\ **Spot** \\ **(s)** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Contaminated Soil Replacement Site**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Event Stadium Construction**} \\ \cline{2-9}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Load**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Settlement**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Load**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Settlement**} & \multirow{2}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} **Bearing** \\ **Test** \\ **(kg/cm\({}^{3}\))** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Interval of**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Load Strength**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Displacement**} & \multirow{2}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Coefficient** \\ **(g/cm\({}^{3}\))** \\ \end{tabular} } \\ \cline{3-4}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Test**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Load Strength**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Displacement**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Meder G**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Test**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Load Strength**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Meder G**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Meder G**} \\  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**(kg/cm\({}^{3}\))**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Reading (cm)**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Reading (cm)**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Reading (cm)**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Reading (cm)**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Reading (cm)**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Reading (cm)**} \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{1} & 1 & 1.22 & 0.25 & 4.89 & 1 & 1.88 & 0.25 & 7.53 \\  & 10 & 0.98 & 0.25 & 3.91 & 10 & 1.80 & 0.25 & 7.20 \\  & 20 & 1.33 & 0.25 & 5.33 & 20 & 2.05 & 0.25 & 8.21 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{2} & 1 & 1.94 & 0.25 & 7.75 & 2 & 3.45 & 0.25 & 13.79 \\  & 9 & 1.91 & 0.25 & 7.65 & 9 & 3.17 & 0.25 & 12.69 \\  & 19 & 2.00 & 0.25 & 8.01 & 19 & 3.51 & 0.25 & 14.02 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{3} & 2 & 2.09 & 0.25 & 8.36 & 3 & 3.99 & 0.25 & 15.95 \\  & 10 & 2.32 & 0.25 & 9.30 & 10 & 4.07 & 0.25 & 16.30 \\  & 18 & 2.09 & 0.25 & 8.35 & 18 & 3.82 & 0.25 & 15.29 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{4} & 3 & 1.53 & 0.25 & 6.12 & 2 & 4.35 & 0.25 & 17.39 \\  & 8 & 1.84 & 0.25 & 7.35 & 8 & 4.24 & 0.25 & 16.96 \\  & 20 & 1.93 & 0.25 & 7.73 & 20 & 3.98 & 0.25 & 15.93 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{5} & 1 & 1.84 & 0.25 & 7.34 & 1 & 4.46 & 0.25 & 17.84 \\  & 9 & 2.11 & 0.25 & 8.44 & 9 & 4.34 & 0.25 & 17.37 \\  & 19 & 1.85 & 0.25 & 7.40 & 19 & 4.08 & 0.25 & 16.33 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{6} & 2 & 2.55 & 0.25 & 10.20 & 3 & 4.50 & 0.25 & 17.99 \\  & 10 & 2.79 & 0.25 & 11.17 & 10 & 4.60 & 0.25 & 18.40 \\  & 18 & 2.84 & 0.25 & 11.37 & 18 & 4.49 & 0.25 & 17.94 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{7} & 1 & 2.65 & 0.25 & 10.61 & 1 & 4.80 & 0.25 & 19.20 \\  & 8 & 2.85 & 0.25 & 11.42 & 8 & 4.96 & 0.25 & 19.86 \\  & 19 & 3.23 & 0.25 & 12.91 & 19 & 5.04 & 0.25 & 20.18 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{8} & 2 & 3.21 & 0.25 & 12.83 & 2 & 5.05 & 0.25 & 20.19 \\  & 9 & 3.09 & 0.25 & 12.35 & 9 & 5.61 & 0.25 & 22.43 \\ \cline{1-1}  & 20 & 3.09 & 0.25 & 12.34 & 20 & 5.10 & 0.25 & 20.39 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Plate load test results. Figure 7: Plate load test arrangement at the construction site. confirm that the CMV value is directly proportional to the number of passes; the second objective was to verify that the bearing coefficients depend upon the number of passes; and the third objective was to confirm that the changes in the CMV are directly proportional to the changes in the bearing coefficient shown (Table 3) and to match the typical CMV with respect to the material (Table 4). These three objectives were achieved, which verifies the applicability of the developed system. The IC roller values were recorded. Figure 8 shows the CMV data recorded during the compaction operation. The CMV values show that the event stadium values are higher than the contaminated soil replacement site.