# Improving Hardware in LUT-Based Mealy FSMs
## 6 Experimental Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c} \hline
**Benchmark** & **Auto [13]** & **One-Hot [13]** & **JEDI [14]** & \(\mathbf{U_{2}}\) [14]** & **Our Approach** & **Group** \\ \hline cse & 146.43 & 163.64 & 178.12 & 175.18 & 172.42 & 1 \\ \hline dk14 & 191.64 & 172.65 & 193.85 & 190.18 & 188.86 & 1 \\ \hline dk15 & 192.53 & 185.36 & 194.87 & 192.23 & 191.48 & 1 \\ \hline dk16 & 169.72 & 174.79 & 197.13 & 194.34 & 192.83 & 1 \\ \hline donfile & 184.03 & 184 & 203.65 & 200.92 & 198.47 & 1 \\ \hline ex2 & 198.57 & 198.57 & 200.14 & 198.32 & 197.26 & 1 \\ \hline ex4 & 180.96 & 177.71 & 192.83 & 190.14 & 188.32 & 1 \\ \hline ex6 & 169.57 & 163.8 & 176.59 & 171.27 & 170.18 & 1 \\ \hline ex7 & 200.04 & 200.84 & 200.6 & 198.14 & 197.38 & 1 \\ \hline keyb & 156.45 & 143.47 & 168.43 & 162.01 & 161.25 & 1 \\ \hline mark1 & 162.39 & 162.39 & 176.18 & 170.18 & 168.04 & 1 \\ \hline opus & 166.2 & 166.2 & 178.32 & 175.29 & 173.41 & 1 \\ \hline s27 & 198.73 & 191.5 & 199.13 & 196.13 & 194.17 & 1 \\ \hline s386 & 168.15 & 173.46 & 179.15 & 176.85 & 174.62 & 1 \\ \hline s8 & 180.02 & 178.95 & 181.23 & 178.23 & 176.22 & 1 \\ \hline sse & 157.06 & 169.12 & 174.63 & 170.12 & 167.43 & 1 \\ \hline ex1 & 150.94 & 139.76 & 176.87 & 182.34 & 180.01 & 2 \\ \hline kirkman & 141.38 & 154 & 156.68 & 167.15 & 165.62 & 2 \\ \hline planet & 132.71 & 132.71 & 187.14 & 189.12 & 187.07 & 2 \\ \hline planet1 & 132.71 & 132.71 & 187.14 & 189.12 & 187.07 & 2 \\ \hline pma & 146.18 & 146.18 & 169.83 & 178.19 & 176.26 & 2 \\ \hline s1 & 146.41 & 135.85 & 157.16 & 162.23 & 164.12 & 2 \\ \hline s1488 & 138.5 & 131.94 & 157.18 & 168.32 & 167.14 & 2 \\ \hline s1494 & 149.39 & 145.75 & 164.34 & 172.27 & 170.95 & 2 \\ \hline s1a & 153.37 & 176.4 & 169.17 & 178.21 & 176.25 & 2 \\ \hline s208 & 174.34 & 176.46 & 178.76 & 181.72 & 180.29 & 2 \\ \hline styr & 137.61 & 129.92 & 145.64 & 161.87 & 159.25 & 2 \\ \hline tma & 163.88 & 147.8 & 164.14 & 176.72 & 175.06 & 2 \\ \hline sand & 115.97 & 115.97 & 126.82 & 145.68 & 152.49 & 3 \\ \hline s420 & 173.88 & 176.46 & 177.25 & 187.23 & 190.56 & 4 \\ \hline s510 & 177.65 & 177.65 & 181.42 & 187.32 & 190.24 & 4 \\ \hline s820 & 152 & 153.16 & 176.58 & 181.96 & 183.12 & 4 \\ \hline s832 & 145.71 & 153.23 & 173.78 & 186.12 & 187.45 & 4 \\ \hline Total & 8127.08 & 8061.22 & 8701.97 & 8536.27 & 8658.86 & \\ \hline Percentage,\% & 93.86 & 93.10 & 100.50 & 98.58 & 100.00 & \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 12: _Cont._ \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Benchmark** & **Auto [13]** & **One-Hot [13]** & **JEDI [14]** & **U\({}_{2}\) [14]** & **Our Approach** \\ \hline bbtas & 204.16 & 204.16 & 206.12 & 200.38 & 199.48 \\ \hline dk17 & 199.28 & 167 & 199.39 & 199.87 & 198.03 \\ \hline dk27 & 206.02 & 201.9 & 204.18 & 196.65 & 194.18 \\ \hline dk512 & 196.27 & 196.27 & 199.75 & 194.17 & 192.34 \\ \hline ex3 & 194.86 & 194.86 & 195.76 & 191.22 & 188.14 \\ \hline ex5 & 180.25 & 180.25 & 181.16 & 178.06 & 176.74 \\ \hline lion & 202.43 & 204 & 202.35 & 200.18 & 199.12 \\ \hline lion9 & 205.3 & 185.22 & 206.38 & 199.12 & 197.07 \\ \hline mc & 196.66 & 195.47 & 196.87 & 193.17 & 191.52 \\ \hline modulo12 & 207 & 207 & 207.13 & 201.12 & 200.23 \\ \hline shiftreg & 262.67 & 263.57 & 276.26 & 256.69 & 253.24 \\ \hline Total & 2254.90 & 2199.70 & 2275.35 & 2032.57 & 2190.09 \\ \hline Percentage,\% & 102.96 & 100.44 & 103.89 & 92.81 & 100.00 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 13: Experimental results (the maximum operating frequency for G0).