## 5 Conclusions  
### Discussions  
The current study constructs a theoretical framework that focuses on the consumers of ISFR by integrating the PRT into the TPB. The constructed framework was strengthened by postulating the moderating role of novelty seeking in the effects of perceived risks on attitudes. The proposed hypotheses were tested by performing a quantitative methodology. The results revealed that psychological and quality risks negatively affect AT, SN positively affects AT, and the three predictors of TPB, which include AT, SN, and PBC, positively affect behavioral intentions. Lastly, the moderating impact of novelty seeking was discovered in the relationship between psychological risk and attitude. In other words, the consumers' concerns about the psychological and quality aspects of ISFR evoke unfavorable attitudes, and the consumers' novelty-seeking characteristics weaken the negative effect of psychological risk on AT. Also, the consumers' AT, SN, and PBC play a positive role in regard to forming behavioral intentions in the context of ISFR. The effect of SN on BI is often rejected in the green food purchases context [16; 88; 89]. Nevertheless, subjective norms can also play a crucial role in the technology acceptance behavior context [68]. This study demonstrated that the ISFR consumers' SN forms BI from the perspective of technology acceptance behavior as opposed to pro-environmental behavior. However, the two hypotheses of the negative effects of financial and time risks on AT were statistically rejected. These results are not in line with [PERSON] et al. [21]. Their \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Novelty Seeking**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Unconstrained**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Constrained**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**High**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Low**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Model**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Model**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Model**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & \(\beta\) & \(t\)**-Value** & \(\beta\) & \(t\)**-Value** & \(\chi^{2}\) (474) & \(\chi^{2}\) (475) & \\ \hline H6a & PR\(\rightarrow\)A & \(-0.018\) & \(-0.183\)\({}^{ns}\) & \(-0.361\) & \(-4.253\)\({}^{***}\) & & 923.835 & 11.237 \({}^{S}\) \\ H6b & QR\(\rightarrow\)A & \(-0.356\) & \(-3.597\)\({}^{***}\) & \(-0.176\) & \(-1.873\)\({}^{ns}\) & 912.598 & 912.652 & 0.054 \({}^{NS}\) \\ H6c & FR\(\rightarrow\)A & \(0.015\) & \(0.163\)\({}^{ns}\) & \(0.120\) & \(0.177\)\({}^{ns}\) & 913.724 & 1.126 \({}^{NS}\) \\ H6d & TR\(\rightarrow\)A & \(0.052\) & \(0.546\)\({}^{ns}\) & \(0.083\) & \(0.357\)\({}^{ns}\) & 912.850 & 0.252 \({}^{NS}\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
Notes 1: PR = Psychological risk, QR = Quality risk, FR = Financial risk, TR = Time risk, and A = Attitude. Notes 2: \({}^{***}\)\(p<0.001\), \({}^{ns}\) = not significant, \({}^{S}\) = supported, and \({}^{NS}\) = not supported.  
\end{table} 
Table 6: Results for the moderating impact of novelty seeking. Figure 3: Standardized theoretical path coefficients. Notes: \({}^{***}\)\(p<0.001\), \({}^{ns}\) = not significant, \(S\) = supported and \(NS\) = not supported, \({}^{a}\) path coefficient for the group with a high level of novelty seeking, and \({}^{b}\) path coefficient for the group with a low level of novelty seeking. study revealed that the financial and time risks of robotic restaurants had negative effects on AT. The current study and their study involve investigations into the context of new technology-based restaurants, but they have subtle differences. One of the advantages of smart farms is economics, which is according to productivity, so the consumers' perceived financial risks might be not important in regard to forming attitudes towards ISFR. On the other hand, consumers might perceive that companies can provide robot services at expensive prices, because the robots require significant initial investments in regard to research and development. Thus, the financial risk of robot services might play a crucial role in regard to forming negative AT during the initial stages of implementation.