## 9 Comparison and Significance  
In this section of the paper, we emphasise the significance of this work and provide a comparison with the existing tools that have already been used. As described in the earlier sections of the paper, this work is the first ever attempt to provide a general-purpose simulation and visualisation of the real-time behaviour of IoT applications. The proposed tool is also novel in a sense that it leverages web-based technologies hosted on AWS cloud unlike previous traditional desktop-based tools like STRESS and SimSo. Another unique feature of the proposed tool is that it acts as a central point to manage IoT nodes and schedule various tasks in a smart space. There are a few solutions that are believed to be similar. STORM and VizzSchedular, for instance, which are described in the introduction of the paper are considered more close to this research. However, the proposed approach is different in many aspects; first, the proposed tool is very generic and can be utilised for traditional real-time systems, IoT application and even smart industries. Second, it is using the latest technology stack to get benefited from the cutting-edge technologies. Lastly, it is hosted in AWS cloud which provides the added benefits of intelligent and monitoring of different IoT tasks. Table 8 summarises various tools and their comparison with the proposed work. Figure 17: Performance Analysis: Case 2: Edge-to-edge Communication, Delay = 10 ms, Bandwidth = 10 Mbps. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**S.No**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Name**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Cloud**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Open-Source**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Major Domain**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Fragaming**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Maintenance**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Real**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**General-Simulation in 10F Environment**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Speed**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Shared**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Data**} \\  & & & & & & & & **Stautes** & & **10F Environment** & & & \\ \hline
1 & STRBS [57] & No & No & Real-time task scheduling & C Language & Not maintained & No & Yes & Dekkktop & No & No \\
2 & GHGT [58] & No & No & Real-time task scheduling & & & & & & & \\
3 & MAST [40,72] & No & No & Speculating Visualization & Ads & Not maintained & No & Yes & Dekkktop & Yes & No \\
4 & STORM [40] & No & Yes & Visualization and Simulation & Java & Not maintained & No & Yes & Dekkktop & Yes & No \\
5 & SmithS [44] & No & Yes & Simulation and Visualization & Python & Maintained for bugs only & No & Yes & Dekktop & No & No \\
6 & SDMSim [49] & No & No & Specify-based random & Multiple Languages & No & No & Web-based & No & No \\
7 & SSF [58] & No & Yes & Data intensive analysis tool on HPC & Python & Achively Maintained & No & No & Dekkktop & Yes & Partial \\
8 & Tasking[58] & Yes & No & Speculating Algorithms Memory insight & C/C++ & Unknown & Yes & Yes & Dekktop & Yes & Yes \\
9 & MCRIN [52] & No & Yes & Visualization and Simulation & Java & Maintained for bugs only & No & Yes & Dekktop & No & No \\
10 & Score [50] & No & No & Energy Consumption Analysis tool & Multiple Languages & Unknown & Yes & No & Web-based & Yes & Partial \\
11 & MCRIN [52] & No & No & Resource-Contrained Scheduling & Java & Achively Maintained & No & No & Dekktop & No \\
12 & ABEMEM [57] & No & Energy Management tool & Python, C++ & Unknown & No & No & Dekktop & No & No \\
13 & Location Tracker & Yes & Yes & IoT Content Tracker & Android & Maintained for bugs only & N/A & No & Mobile Application & No & Yes \\
14 & Driverware & & & & & & & & & \\
14 & DY bubbles [34,60] & Yes & Yes & IoT API Provider & Javascript & Achively Maintained & Yes & No & Headness Based & N/A & Yes \\
15 & Proposed Lock & Yes & Yes & IoT Scheduling Simulator & Python & Achively Maintained & No & No & Web-based & No & Yes \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Comparative Analysis of Proposed Tool with existing state-of-the-art tools and testbeds.