# HSB-SPAM: An Efficient Image Filtering Detection Technique
## 4 Experimental Results
### Results for Complex Scenarios
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**METHODs**} & **MF3** & **MF3** & **MF3** & **MF3** & **MF3** & **MF3** & **MF5** & **MF5** & **MF5** & **MF5** & **AVG3** & **AVG3** & **AVG5** & **AVG3** & **GAU3** \\ \cline{2-19}  & **MF5** & **AVG3** & **AVG5** & **GAU3** & **GAU5** & **AVG3** & **AVG5** & **GAU3** & **GAU5** & **GAU3** & **GAU3** & **GAU3** & **GAU3** & **GAU5** & **AVG5** & **GAU5** \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{19}{c}{Image Size 64 \(\times\) 64 Uncompressed} \\ \hline GLF & 94.55 & 99.27 & 98.00 & 99.17 & 99.27 & 98.96 & 98.19 & 98.99 & 99.10 & 95.00 & 94.00 & 97.99 & 97.48 & 96.00 & 84.00 \\ \hline GDCTF & 67.00 & 76.00 & 86.00 & 74.00 & 81.00 & 70.00 & 80.00 & 70.00 & 75.00 & 70.00 & 77.00 & 70.00 & 75.00 & 67.00 \\ \hline PERB & 83.54 & 81.08 & 88.33 & 79.55 & 81.11 & 85.49 & 76.70 & 88.02 & 87.19 & 61.53 & 64.27 & 86.98 & 82.74 & 82.85 & 66.56 \\ \hline SPAM & 98.96 & 99.26 & 99.48 & 99.69 & 99.69 & 99.72 & 99.65 & 99.72 & 99.76 & 87.88 & 92.53 & 96.77 & 95.80 & 87.15 & 84.03 \\ \hline HSB-SPAM & 96.32 & 99.82 & 99.65 & 99.41 & 99.48 & 99.34 & 98.30 & 99.41 & 99.55 & 96.90 & 96.00 & 98.33 & 97.99 & 97.78 & 86.00 \\ \hline \multicolumn{19}{c}{Image Size 64 \(\times\) 64 JPEG Q = 70} \\ \hline GLF & 89.93 & 93.58 & 96.76 & 86.67 & 92.78 & 95.38 & 93.85 & 93.72 & 94.97 & 82.57 & 69.55 & 97.35 & 96.15 & 96.56 & 76.70 \\ \hline GDCTF & 68.00 & 76.00 & 87.00 & 70.00 & 80.00 & 66.00 & 79.00 & 80.00 & 69.00 & 57.00 & 58.00 & 91.00 & 67.00 & 73.00 & 62.00 \\ \hline PERB & 81.91 & 74.86 & 88.58 & 69.20 & 81.22 & 85.31 & 80.87 & 87.47 & 88.68 & 58.82 & 56.81 & 87.33 & 81.46 & 82.88 & 67.47 \\ \hline SPAM & 83.40 & 87.05 & 93.75 & 76.91 & 90.97 & 91.81 & 90.52 & 91.18 & 92.53 & 59.65 & 61.11 & 95.63 & 84.20 & 86.22 & 74.27 \\ \hline HSB-SPAM & 91.99 & 96.38 & 98.74 & 92.60 & 96.52 & 98.29 & 96.87 & 95.69 & 97.74 & 82.81 & 71.93 & 99.13 & 98.53 & 98.56 & 78.95 \\ \hline \multicolumn{19}{c}{Image Size 64 \(\times\) 64 JPEG Q = 50} \\ \hline GLF & 87.57 & 90.49 & 97.71 & 87.74 & 90.97 & 93.19 & 93.30 & 92.85 & 92.64 & 75.83 & 62.33 & 96.25 & 95.31 & 96.53 & 74.31 \\ \hline GDCTF & 67.00 & 74.00 & 87.00 & 70.00 & 79.00 & 64.00 & 77.00 & 63.00 & 66.00 & 60.00 & 59.00 & 79.00 & 69.00 & 73.00 & 63.00 \\ \hline PERB & 81.39 & 75.87 & 89.41 & 68.47 & 82.67 & 84.90 & 79.51 & 86.15 & 86.42 & 60.03 & 55.63 & 87.60 & 81.08 & 83.02 & 67.57 \\ \hline SPAM & 79.65 & 83.44 & 92.36 & 78.33 & 87.92 & 87.29 & 87.29 & 88.16 & 86.98 & 87.12 & 59.34 & 57.12 & 89.20 & 83.16 & 84.13 & 70.31 \\ \hline HSB-SPAM & 89.68 & 95.06 & 98.43 & 92.18 & 95.65 & 96.10 & 95.76 & 95.06 & 95.65 & 78.00 & 64.89 & 98.50 & 97.34 & 98.00 & **76.63** \\ \hline \multicolumn{19}{c}{Image Size 64 \(\times\) 64 JPEG Q = 30} \\ \hline GLF & 86.42 & 87.74 & 97.15 & 80.73 & 89.10 & 88.75 & 92.53 & 87.71 & 87.33 & **71.77** & 58.99 & 96.15 & 94.24 & 95.38 & 71.94 \\ \hline GDCTF & 67.00 & 71.00 & 87.00 & 65.00 & 75.00 & 61.00 & 76.00 & 61.00 & 64.00 & 60.00 & 52.99 & 80.00 & 71.00 & 75.00 & 64.00 \\ \hline PERB & 81.04 & 75.38 & 89.31 & 67.53 & 82.05 & 81.11 & 79.83 & 82.88 & 82.36 & 59.31 & 55.07 & 87.60 & 81.18 & 82.85 & 69.65 \\ \hline SPAM & 76.77 & 79.34 & 92.29 & 69.69 & 84.27 & 79.51 & 85.31 & 80.17 & 79.34 & 54.17 & 54.51 & 88.82 & 81.91 & 84.03 & 68.37 \\ \hline HSB-SPAM & 88.35 & 92.11 & 97.88 & 88.05 & 93.64 & 92.56 & 94.85 & 91.80 & 91.97 & 71.42 & 61.24 & **97.43** & 96.13 & 96.07 & 75.03 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Percentage of detection accuracy on filtered images.