## 4 Proposed RIACT Process  
The different components of the proposed RIACT's processes are summarized in Figure 2 and can be described as follows. At the highest level, the first step is to reduce the **scope** by choosing the level of analysis to be carried out. Continent-level analysis can range from country-level to city-level and city-level to municipality-level analyses, depending on the needs and goals of the assessment. This step is essential for choosing the right assessment focus and confirming that it corresponds with the desired outcomes. Selecting the analysis' **context** comes after the scope has been established. Two important factors, risk and assets, are used to establish the context of the analysis. The threats and dangers that the system or entity under evaluation might encounter are referred to as risks. Contrarily, assets are the essential parts of the system that must be protected and resilient in the face of these dangers. The next step is to focus the **criteria** that will be used to evaluate the risk and assets of the system after choosing the analysis' context. The \"amount and type of risk that it may or may not take relative to objectives\" is how ISO 31000 defines criteria. To put it another way, the criteria are the precise parameters that will be used to assess the risk and resources of the system, and they must be customized to the set objectives and context of the assessment. It is important to remember that RIACT processes are not fixed and must be regularly reviewed and updated to stay effective against evolving risks and challenges. By monitoring and evaluating the system's performance against established criteria, we can identify areas that need improvement or adjustment. In addition, RIACT processes are not limited to a specific type of system or entity, and they can be applied to a range of scenarios, such as natural disasters, cyberattacks, terrorism, and other threats. The processes are flexible and adaptable to suit the specific needs and circumstances of the system or entity under evaluation. RIACT processes provide a comprehensive and structured approach to risk assessment and critical asset protection. By following the proposed processes and selecting the appropriate scope, context, and criteria, entities can enhance their resilience and preparedness in the face of potential threats and hazards. Regular monitoring and evaluation can help ensure the continued effectiveness of RIACT processes in addressing the evolving risks and challenges facing the system. The three main steps taken in this process, which are based on ISO 31000, comprise **identification**, **analysis**, and **evaluation**, and next is the treatment of risk is below of the inner box and then communication and consulting, monitor and review, and recording and reporting are the supportive steps around the main body of the process. The identification of urban resilience consists of two separate boxes, one for disaster risk hazard and the other for asset system exposure. These two boxes work together to provide a comprehensive view of the city's resilience, with each box having three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. The **identification** and **analysis** urban resilience phases are the most important aspects for ensuring the longevity and stability of cities. The general form of the process includes scope, context, and criteria located at the centre, with communication and consulting and monitoring and reviewing located on the sides. The **analysis** phase uses the selected context-based indicators as inputs and is used to make long-term and short-term decisions for capital expenditure and operating expenditure. The indicators will work in an automated, rational, and consistent decision-making scenario using a weighting system, providing the best decisions for the scope, context, and criteria of the city.