## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Variables** & **Control Group** & **SBDS Group** & \(p\)**Value** & **[PERSON] et al., 2019 [15]** \\ \hline AspAT U/L & \(41.30\pm 31.86\) & \(33.68\pm 15.77\) & NS & \(65.2\pm 1.56\) \\ \hline AlAT U/L & \(39.00\pm 12.49\) & \(42.63\pm 10.35\) & NS & \(23.77\pm 0.29\) \\ \hline ALP U/L & \(465.70\pm 161.49\) & \(353.68\pm 79.97\) & \(0.006\) & \(339.36\pm 26.08\) \\ \hline Creatinine \(\mu\)mol/L & \(21.80\pm 17.39\) & \(24.63\pm 18.74\) & NS & \(21.50\pm 0.60\) \\ \hline Amylase U/L & \(3121.30\pm 186.43\) & \(2945.89\pm 254.64\) & \(0.022\) & \\ \hline DGGR U/L & \(14.95\pm 4.27\) & \(13.74\pm 2.83\) & NS & \\ \hline TP g/L & \(41.45\pm 7.00\) & \(42.42\pm 4.32\) & NS & \(85.8\pm 1.49\) \\ \hline Albumin g/L & \(17.00\pm 1.26\) & \(20.12\pm 5.29\) & \(0.007\) & \(22.5\pm 2.20\) \\ \hline Total bilirubin \(\mu\)mol/L & \(2.93\pm 0.83\) & \(3.62\pm 1.61\) & NS & \\ \hline Urine acid \(\mu\)mol/L & \(443.15\pm 164.02\) & \(432.8\pm 237.99\) & NS & \\ \hline Glucose mmol/L & \(9.57\pm 0.96\) & \(8.95\pm 1.62\) & NS & \\ \hline Total calcium mmol/L & \(2.80\pm 0.14\) & \(2.81\pm 0.35\) & NS & \\ \hline Inorganic phosphorus mmol/L & \(2.05\pm 0.34\) & \(1.80\pm 0.22\) & \(0.011\) & \\ \hline Sodium mmol/L & \(141.44\pm 33.18\) & \(143.14\pm 34.49\) & NS & \\ \hline Potassium mmol/L & \(10.81\pm 34.70\) & \(8.87\pm 27.55\) & \(0.023\) & \\ \hline Chlorides mmol/L & \(103.82\pm 5.99\) & \(100.13\pm 23.53\) & NS & \\ \hline Cholesterol mmol/L & \(4.86\pm 0.81\) & \(5.68\pm 2.29\) & NS & \(5.06\pm 0.17\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Biochemical results of Pekin ducks in the control group and Pekin ducks with short beak and dwarfism syndrome (SBDS). Data are presented as average \(\pm\) standard deviation. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline
**Organs** & **SBDS Group** & **No. of Figs** \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline
**Tongue** & **Keratinisation on the surface of the tongue.** \\  & **Degeneration of the tongue along with ulceration.** \\  & **Inflammatory infiltrate heterophilic cells.** \\  & **Proliferating blood vessels around the inflammation.** \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline
**Liver** & **Mild interstitial inflammatory infiltrates of heterophilic cells.** \\  & **Hepatocyte vacuolation.** \\  & **Congestion.** \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline
**Liver** & **Tubulointerstitial congestion.** \\  & **Lymphocytic infiltration.** \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: _Cont._The biochemical data indicate a statistically significant increase in albumin (Figure S4) (\(p<0.006\)) as well as a decrease in non-organic phosphorus (\(p<0.011\)) (Figure S5) and potassium (\(p<0.023\)) (Figure S6) in the SBDS group vs. the control group. One pancreas parameter, amylase, showed a statistically significant increase (\(p<0.022\)) (Figure S7), \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Organs** & **SBDS Group** & **No. of Figs** \\ \hline Heart & Interstitial hyperaemia between muscle fibres. & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: _Cont._although DGGR, a more specific pancreas enzyme for humans, dogs, and cats, decreased in the SBDS group compared to the control group. The statistically significant difference in biochemistry results was noted during the blood test for ALP. The control group had an ALP value of 465.70 \(\pm\) 161.49, while the SBDS group had a value of 353.68 \(\pm\) 79.97, with a \(p\) < 0.006 (Figure S8). The ALP concentration in the clinically healthy group was 25% higher than in the SBDS group.