## 3 Results  
Comparison of CRP concentration ratio at 1 st day after surgery (Day 1) and before treatment (Day 0) obtained for study group treated by flapless method was 3.74 and control group treated with standard procedure was 2.5. Comparison of CRP concentration ratio at 7 th day after surgery (Day 7) and before treatment (Day 0) obtained for study group treated by flapless method was 1.2 and control group treated with standard procedure was 1.7. Comparison of VAS scale ratio (Day 1/Day 0) at 1 st day after surgery (Day 1) and before treatment (Day 0) obtained for study group treated by flapless method was 1.04 and control group treated with standard procedure was 1.5. Comparison of VAS scale ratio (Day 7/Day 0) at 7 th day after surgery (Day 7) and before treatment (Day 0) obtained for study group treated by flapless method was 0.51 and control group treated with standard procedure was 0.52. The presented box graphs in Figures 3 and 4 show the differences between the CRP concentration ratio from day 1 after surgery and before treatment, as well as the CRP concentration ratio measured on day 7 after surgery and before treatment, obtained for the study group treated with the free-lobe method and the control group treated with the standard procedure, respectively. Despite the fact that there were no significant differences between the mean values for the CRP concentration ratio on Day 1/Day 0 as well as on Day 7/Day 0 when comparing the study group treated with the flapless method and the control group treated with thestandard procedure, there are some observable tendencies that may show completely different characters. First of all, the concentration of CRP decreases with time after surgery in both studied groups. However, the ratio coefficient calculated on day 1 after surgery seems to be higher for the study group and on day 7 after the tendency is opposed. This may suggest that the inflammatory state in the study group treated with the flapless method decreased faster over time than in the control group. Moreover, on day 7 after the procedure, the concentration drop is deeper for the study group. Such results are not statistically significant, so they may show some tendencies that can only be confirmed by using a larger group of patients. The next analyses are presented as box graphs in Figures 5 and 6, which show the differences in the VAS scale ratios on day 1 after surgery and before treatment as well as the VAS scale ratio calculated on day 7 after surgery and before treatment, obtained for the study group treated with the flapless method and the control group treated with the standard procedure, respectively. Figure 7 presents a box graph that shows the differences between the saliva II-6 concentration ratios on day 1 after surgery and before treatment as well as the ratio calculated on day 7 after surgery and before treatment, obtained for the study group treated with the flapless method and the control group treated with the standard procedure. Figure 3: Comparison of CRP concentration ratio on day 1 after surgery (Day 1) and before treatment (Day 0), obtained for the study group treated with the flapless method and the control group treated with the standard procedure. It should be noted that there were no significant differences between the studied groups. However, some tendencies can be seen, such as a significantly higher mean increase in the salivary II-6 concentration in the control group on the first post-operative day. On the other hand, the II-6 concentration ratio on day 7 after treatment seems to be similar and significantly lower in comparison to the ratios calculated after the first day for both groups. Figure 4: Comparison of CRP concentration ratio on day 7 after surgery (Day 7) and before treatment (Day 0), obtained for the study group treated with the flapless method and the control group treated with the standard procedure.