## 2 Results
### Factors Associated with Attitude
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Variables**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**N = 387 (\%)**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Attitude**} \\ \cline{3-6}  & & \(\beta\)1  & **SE2 ** & **95\% CI3 ** & \(p\)-Value** \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{l}{**Professional degree 1**} \\  & & & & & \\  & BSc in Pharmacy & 202 (52.20) & 0.41 & 1.02 & \(-\)1.58–2.41 & 0.68 \\  & PharmD (Pharmaceutical Care) & 150 (38.76) & \(-\)0.69 & 1.04 & \(-\)2.74–1.36 & 0.507 \\  & PharmD (Industrial Pharmacy) & 31 (8.00) & 0.84 & 1.87 & \(-\)2.83–4.52 & 0.651 \\  & PharmD (Pharmaceutical and Health & 2 (0.52) & 0.38 & 7.08 & \(-\)13.55–14.30 & 0.9570 \\  & Consumer Protection) & 2 (0.52) & \(-\)0.63 & 7.08 & \(-\)14.55–13.30 & 0.9290 \\  & PharmD (English programme) & 2 (0.52) & \(-\)0.63 & 7.08 & \(-\)14.55–13.30 & 0.9290 \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{l}{**Clerkship 2**} \\  & Community pharmacy & 329 & 1.36 & 1.42 & \(-\)1.42–4.15 & 0.3380 \\  & Hospital pharmacy & 319 & 0.06 & 1.33 & \(-\)2.55–2.68 & 0.9630 \\  & Manufacturing & 105 & 1.65 & 1.14 & \(-\)0.59–3.88 & 0.1490 \\  & Drug registration & 31 & 2.85 & 1.86 & \(-\)0.81–6.50 & 0.1280 \\  & Regulation and jurisdiction & 44 & 2.81 & 1.59 & \(-\)0.31–5.93 & 0.0787 * \\  & Research and development & 56 & 2.22 & 1.42 & \(-\)0.58–5.02 & 0.1210 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Multiple answers accepted, 1
* Parameter estimate coefficient, 2
* Confidence interval,
* \(p\) \(<\) 0.1.  
\end{table} 
Table 6: Bivariate analysis of Attitude with professional background factors. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Variables**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**N = 387 (\%)**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Attitude**} \\ \cline{3-6}  & & \(\beta\)1  & **SE2 ** & **95\% CI3 ** & \(p\)-Value** \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{l}{Experience as} \\  & community pharmacist & & & & \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{l}{Year} & Mean = 5.59 & 0.07 & 0.08 & \(-\)0.09– & 0.0593 * \\  & & & & 0.23 & 0.0593 * \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{l}{Student internships} \\  & No & 303 (78.29) & & & \\  & Yes & 84 (21.71) & 4.28 & 1.21 & 1.91–6.66 & 0.000463 *** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Parameter estimate coefficient, 2
* Confidence interval,
* \(p\) \(<\) 0.1, **
* \(p\) \(<\) 0.001.  
\end{table} 
Table 7: Bivariate analysis of Attitude with work employment factors. about antimicrobial resistance. Higher knowledge decreased the attitude score by 0.01 SD and the effect was statistically non-significant (\(p\) = 0.823). An increase of approximately one knowledge score was associated with a decrease of 0.01 in the attitude score. However, antibiotic stewardship training experience affected the Attitude positively. That is, being a pharmacist who had antibiotic stewardship training experience during the pharmacy course increased the attitude score by 1.78 SD, which was statistically non-significant (\(p\) = 0.0804). Table 6 demonstrates the correlation between Attitude and professional background factors. Attitude was slightly affected--increased--by having a BSc in Pharmacy degree. That is, being a pharmacist who had a BSc in Pharmacy degree increased the attitude score by 0.41 SD, which was statistically non-significant (\(p\) = 0.68). Attitude was slightly affected--decreased--by having a PharmD in pharmaceutical care. That is, being a pharmacist who had a PharmD in pharmaceutical care decreased the attitude score by 0.69 SD, which was statistically non-significant (\(p\) = 0.507). Attitude was slightly affected--increased--by having a PharmD in industrial Pharmacy. That is, being a pharmacist who had a PharmD in Industrial Pharmacy increased the attitude score by 0.84 SD, which was statistically non-significant (\(p\) = 0.651). Attitude was slightly affected--increased--by having a PharmD in pharmaceutical and health consumer protection. That is, being a pharmacist who had a PharmD in Pharmaceutical and Health Consumer Protection increased the attitude score by 0.38 SD, which was statistically non-significant (\(p\) = 0.957).