## 8 Simulation Results and Discussion  
The calculations performed for the cross-section located in Sector 1 identified a potential slip surface within the weathered layers. However, the obtained factor of safety significantly exceeds the minimum safety threshold of 1.50, reaching a value of 5.18, indicating that the occurrence of landslides in Sector 1 is highly unlikely. Nevertheless, despite  
Figure 9: Computational models (**a**) Sector 4—cross-section 4 (joint group: orange line—A, dark green line—B1, olive line—B2, and purple line—C): (**b**) Sector 5—cross-section 5 (joint group: orange line—A, olive line—B, purple line—C, and yellow line—D): (**c**) Sector 6—cross-section 6 (joint group: light orange line—A1, orange line—A2, olive line—B1, green line—B2, purple line—C, yellow line—D1,—pale yellow line—D2, and light blue line—E). the high factor of safety, the possibility of the local detachment of smaller rock fragments or larger rock blocks cannot be entirely ruled out, particularly following winter periods or after intense or prolonged rainfall. The calculated factor of safety and the corresponding slip surface are presented in Figure 10.  
The slope stability calculations performed for Sector 2 yielded a factor of safety of 2.99. This value similarly indicates a very low probability of landslide occurrence, confirming stable and safe conditions. The potential slip surface was identified within the weathered material layers. Although the analysis returned a high factor of safety, the possibility of local block detachment or shallow debris slides in adverse conditions (such as spring thaw, prolonged heavy rainfall, or freeze-thaw cycles) cannot be entirely ruled out. The calculation results for Sector 3 indicate a low probability of landslide occurrence, with a factor of safety of 1.41. The potential slip surface is located within the weathered layers. However, this factor of safety is lower than the accepted threshold for safe conditions (1.50). Given the FS value below 1.50 and the slip surface extending into the rock layers, additional calculations were carried out for Sector 3, excluding the weathered slope material. This analysis yielded a factor of safety of 5.51, indicating that landslide occurrence under these conditions is highly unlikely. The calculated factor of safety values and the corresponding slip surfaces are presented in Figures 11 and 12. The identified slip surface for Sector 4, corresponding to the lowest calculated factor of safety, is located approximately at the mid-height of the rock wall (Figure 13). Based on the stability analysis, there is a very high probability of landslide occurrence in this sector. The calculated factor of safety was so low that no numerical value could be assigned (FS \(<<\) 1.0). This result is attributed to the modelled joint network and the failure mechanism, which involves the detachment and sliding of rock blocks occurring along the intersections of discontinuities, where immediate block separation and collapse are initiated. Figure 10: The slip surface for Sector 1, identified via the total displacement distribution, has a factor of safety (FS) of 5.18. Figure 11: The slip surface for Sector 3, identified via the total displacement distribution, has a factor of safety (FS) of 1.41. Figure 12: The slip surface for Sector 3 was identified based on the total displacement distribution; the weathered slope was excluded from the calculations, resulting in a factor of safety (FS) of 5.51. The stability analysis results indicate the presence of unstable rock blocks and active slope failure processes in Sector 4. These findings are consistent with field observations obtained during the geological mapping campaign. The analysis conducted for Sector 5 yielded a factor of safety of 1.17, which indicates a probable occurrence of landslides within this sector. The potential slip surface extends through the weathered layers and across the mid-section of the rock wall, where unstable rock blocks have been identified. Field mapping data further supports this condition.