# Advancing Brain Tumor Segmentation with Spectral-Spatial Graph Neural Networks
## 4 Conclusions  
In conclusion, our research shows that Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), combining spectral and spatial aspects, provide a superior approach for accurate and precise brain tumor segmentation. The preliminary supervoxel generation phase showed that VCCS outperformed SLIC, Watershed, Meanshift, and Felzenszwalb-Huttenlocher in homogeneity, inertia, shape uniformity, and size uniformity. This sets a strong foundation for further analysis. Meticulous hyperparameter tuning maximized the performance of our Spectral-Spatial GNN model. This model demonstrates superior accuracy in both whole tumor and sub-region segmentation compared to traditional methods and individual Spectral or Spatial GNNs, with the dice coefficient and other metrics as proof. Our Spectral-Spatial GNN model's accuracy and precision advances have significant potential to enhance brain tumor diagnosis, treatment planning, and fundamental research. To fully realize this potential, future research should prioritize developing optimized techniques for faster, more resource-efficient analysis of graph-based medical imaging, while also addressing limited data availability through few-shot learning within GNNs to ensure robust model performance even with smaller datasets. S.M. performed the conceptualization, methodology, computation, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing--original draft preparation, writing--review and editing, visualization. M.A. provided supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. This research received no external funding. The data that support the finding of this study are openly available in BraTS at [[http://braintumorsegmentation.org](http://braintumorsegmentation.org)]([http://braintumorsegmentation.org](http://braintumorsegmentation.org)), accessed on 14 April 2024. We express our sincere gratitude to [PERSON] at Chapman University for their thorough review of our paper, which significantly contributed to enhancing its quality. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: \begin{tabular}{l l} GNN & Graph Neural Networks \\ VCCS & Voxel Cloud Connectivity Segmentation \\ SLIC & Simple Linear Iterative Clustering \\ ReLU & Rectified Linear Unit \\ LSTM & Long Short-Term Memory \\ \end{tabular}  References  
* [PERSON] et al. (2017) [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. _Sci. Data_**2017**, \(4\), 170117. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] et al. (2014) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). _IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging_**2014**, _34_, 1993-2024. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* [PERSON] et al. (2017) [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks. _Med. Image Anal._**2017**, _35_, 18-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* [PERSON] et al. (2016) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3 DV), Stanford, CA, USA, 25-28 October 2016. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] et al. (2020) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Study on mri medical image segmentation technology based on cnn-crf model. _IEEE Access_**2020**, \(8\), 60505-60514. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] et al. (2024) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] A review of graph neural networks: Concepts, architectures, techniques, challenges, datasets, applications, and future directions. _J. Big Data_**2024**, _11_, 18.