# DPSIR Model Applied to the Remediation of Contaminated Sites. A Case Study: Mar Piccolo of Taranto
## 7 Impacts
### Human Health
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Site** & **Organism** & **W/D** & **Cd** & **Cu** & **As** & **Hg** & **Pb** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{St. 1} & _Mytiilus galloprovincialis_ & 5.1 & 0.09 & 1.79 & 3.19 & 0.06 & 0.24 \\  & _Chlamys glabra_ & 7.5 & 0.36 & 2.97 & 2.76 & 0.1 & 1.22 \\  & _Hexaplex trunculus_ & 3.4 & 1.67 & 50.95 & 40 & 0.34 & 0.21 \\  & _Mytiilus galloprovincialis_ & 5.6 & 0.07 & 1.85 & 2.82 & 0.02 & 0.22 \\ St. 2 & _Chlamys glabra_ & 7.8 & 0.25 & 5.23 & 2.41 & 0.02 & 0.36 \\  & _Hexaplex trunculus_ & 3.8 & 1.49 & 45.59 & 35.8 & 0.3 & 0.19 \\  & _Mytiilus galloprovincialis_ & 5.7 & 0.06 & 1.7 & 2.74 & 0.02 & 0.26 \\ St. 3 & _Chlamys glabra_ & 6.1 & 0.28 & 2.11 & 2.61 & 0.02 & 0.43 \\  & _Hexaplex trunculus_ & 3.5 & 1.17 & 17.9 & 17.8 & 0.22 & 0.2 \\  & _Mytiilus galloprovincialis_ & 5.7 & 0.09 & 1.96 & 2.8 & 0.02 & 0.27 \\  & _Chlamys glabra_ & 7 & 0.3 & 2.56 & 2.59 & 0.02 & 0.59 \\  & _Hexaplex trunculus_ & 3.7 & 1.53 & 35.15 & 34.5 & 0.25 & 0.17 \\ St. 4 & _Boops boops_ & 4.17 & N.D. & 0.29 & 0.99 & 0.08 & 0.03 \\  & _Gobius niger_ & 4.34 & N.D. & 0.38 & 1.82 & 0.14 & 0.18 \\  & _Sarpa salpa_ & 4.76 & N.D. & 0.17 & 15.9 & 0.09 & 0.21 \\  & _Trachurus trachomatis_ & 3.45 & 0.05 & 260.9 & 4.15 & 0.44 & 1.03 \\  & Range & N.D.–1.67 & 0.17–260.92 & 0.99–40.03 & 0.02–0.44 & 0.03–1.22 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Mean values of As, Cd, Cu, Hg and Pb (mg/kg wet weight) and wet/dry ratio in soft tissues of marine organisms (_n_ = 3; S.D. range = 7–12%). Figure 15: Location of the sampling stations [69]. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Site** & **Organism** & **W/D** & **\% Fat** & **28** & **52** & **101** & **118** & **153** & **138** & **180** & \(\Sigma\)**7 PCBs** & \(\Sigma\)**6 PCBs** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{St. 1} & _Myriliansglomeriasis_ & 5.1 & 1.2 & 0.25 & 0.43 & 10.69 & 10.31 & 30.71 & 17 & 2.45 & 71.84 & 61.53 \\  & _Chlamps glabra_ & 7.5 & 0.4 & 0.17 & 2.65 & 2.81 & 7.11 & 31.55 & 13.8 & 11.19 & 69.28 & 62.17 \\  & _Hexuplex trunculus_ & 3.4 & 0.7 & 0.26 & 0.56 & 59.53 & 9.29 & 85.94 & 33.26 & 26.56 & 215.41 & 206.12 \\  & _Myriliansglomeriasis_ & 5.6 & 1 & 1.41 & 4.36 & 15.98 & 17.46 & 34.68 & 20.77 & 2.02 & 96.68 & 79.21 \\ St. 2 & _Chlamps glabra_ & 7.8 & 0.3 & 0.08 & 0.05 & 1.47 & 3.22 & 15.33 & 3.83 & 3.56 & 27.55 & 24.33 \\  & _Hexuplex trunculus_ & 3.8 & 1.2 & 0.13 & 0.18 & 2.67e & 19.97 & 108.05 & 29.55 & 16.74 & 201.39 & 181.42 \\  & _Myriliansglomeriasis_ & 5.7 & 0.7 & 1.04 & 7.46 & 24.4 & 27.02 & 62.89 & 37.04 & 5.91 & 165.75 & 138.74 \\ St. 3 & _Chlamps glabra_ & 6.1 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 0.3 & 1.69 & 6.82 & 17.31 & 7.64 & 3.66 & 37.61 & 30.79 \\  & _Hexuplex trunculus_ & 3.5 & 1.7 & 0.31 & 0.29 & 52.6 & 32.46 & 186.66 & 34.8 & 24.2 & 331.31 & 298.86 \\  & _Myriliansglomeriasis_ & 5.7 & 0.8 & 0.67 & 2.6 & 13.7 & 15.44 & 36.95 & 21.51 & 2.16 & 93.02 & 77.58 \\  & _Chlamps glabra_ & 7 & 0.6 & 0.3 & 0.17 & 2.69 & 2.24 & 13.37 & 3.4 & 0.43 & 22.6 & 20.36 \\  & _Hexuplex trunculus_ & 3.7 & 1.5 & 0.35 & 5.81 & 35.22 & 33.59 & 172.05 & 45.92 & 45.27 & 337.22 & 304.62 \\ St. 4 & _Boops hoops_ & 4.2 & 0.6 & N.D. & 0.12 & 3 & 1.78 & 105.6 & 30.13 & 29.4 & 170.03 & 168.25 \\  & _Goins niger_ & 4.3 & 0.4 & 0.31 & 0.58 & 3.1 & 4.91 & 37.39 & 22.29 & 15.23 & 83.81 & 78.9 \\  & _Sarpa sulpa_ & 4.8 & 1.1 & N.D. & 0.08 & 2.34 & 2.31 & 23.22 & 10.97 & 7.4 & 46.32 & 44.01 \\  & _Tachuras trachurus_ & 3.5 & 4.3 & 0.1 & 3.67 & 29.62 & 14.7 & 174.54 & 92.77 & 41.89 & 357.26 & 342.55 \\  & Range & & & N.D.–1.41 & 0.05–7.46 & 1.47–99.53 & 1.78–32.59 & 13.37–186.66 & 34.0–92.77 & 0.43–76.75 & 22.60–357.26 & 20.36–342.55 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Mean values of PCB congeners (ug/kg wet weight), wet/dry ratio, and fat content (%) in soft tissues of marine organisms (\(n=3\); S.D. range \(=8\)–15%). In the fish _T. trachomatis_, for example, the concentrations of six target PCBs were five times higher than the EC limit.