## 3 Results  
The results of this study involved 21 separate patient-level analyses. After the interpretation of the MBD results of all the individual patients, it can be said that 10 patients showed overall improvement, five patients showed overall impairment, and six patients did not show overall change. In this section, we present one example of the patient-level analysis (Patient S014) in Table 3 and Figure 3. The numerical results and biomechanical interpretation of all participants are presented as Supplementary Materials in an Excel file. \begin{table} \begin{tabular}{l r r r r r} \hline \hline
**Variables** & **Mean Pre (\(SD\))** & **Mean Post (\(SD\))** & **X\(\mathit{diff}\) (\(\mathit{CLifif}\))** & \(\pm\delta\) & **N/T/P (\%)** \\ \hline _StepLgth.H_ (cm) & 24.7 (6.0) & 38.1 (3.1) & 13.4 (2.4) & 2.8 & 0/0/100 \\ _StepLgth.A_ (cm) & 32.1 (4.1) & 44.0 (2.9) & 11.9 (1.8) & 1.9 & 0/0/100 \\ _StepWidth.H_ (cm) & 23.3 (2.5) & 22.7 (2.2) & \(-\)0.7 (1.2) & 1.1 & 22/78/0 \\ _StepWidth.A_ (cm) & 27.9 (2.8) & 23.2 (1.5) & \(-\)4.7 (1.1) & 1.3 & 100/0/0 \\ _FullSupp.H_ (\%) & 66.8 (2.8) & 60.6 (4.2) & \(-\)6.2 (2.0) & 1.3 & 100/0/0 \\ _FullSupp.A_ (\%) & 64.9 (4.7) & 64.1 (2.2) & \(-\)0.8 (1.8) & 2.2 & 7/93/0 \\ _DoubleSupp.H_ (\%) & 32.0 (3.3) & 24.0 (2.1) & \(-\)8.0 (1.4) & 1.5 & 100/0/0 \\ _DoubleSupp.A_ (\%) & 31.9 (3.3) & 23.7 (1.8) & \(-\)8.3 (1.3) & 1.5 & 100/0 \\ _GaitSpeed_ (cm/s) & 38.5 (4.4) & 61.8 (11.2) & 23.2 (4.9) & 2.1 & 0/0/100 \\ _Pelvic.Tilt.H_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 5.9 (0.9) & 3.4 (0.6) & \(-\)2.5 (0.4) & 0.4 & 100/0/0 \\ _Pelvic.Tilt.A_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 5.7 (0.8) & 3.4 (0.7) & \(-\)2.3 (0.4) & 0.4 & 100/0/0 \\ _Hip.FlexExt.H_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 34.4 (1.8) & 43.6 (1.5) & 9.2 (0.9) & 0.8 & 0/0/100 \\ _Hip.FlexExt.A_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 21.1 (4.5) & 25.9 (2.1) & 4.9 (1.7) & 2.1 & 0/0/100 \\ _Hip.AbAdd.H_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 10.8 (1.4) & 8.5 (1.3) & \(-\)2.2 (0.7) & 0.6 & 100/0/0 \\ _Hip.AbAdd.A_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 10.9 (2.4) & 9.2 (0.9) & \(-\)1.7 (0.9) & 1.1 & 92/8/0 \\ _Knee.FlexExt.H_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 32.2 (4.8) & 26.9 (4.1) & \(-\)5.3 (2.3) & 2.2 & 100/0/0 \\ _Knee.FlexExt.A_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 29.0 (6.0) & 27.9 (2.1) & \(-\)1.1 (2.2) & 2.8 & 6/94/0 \\ _Ankle.FlexExt.H_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 6.9 (5.4) & 7.7 (4.3) & 0.8 (2.5) & 2.5 & 1/91/9 \\ _Ankle.FlexExt.A_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 1.6 (1.1) & 3.7 (0.8) & 2.1 (0.5) & 0.5 & 0/0/100 \\ _Ankle.InvEv.H_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 3.5 (1.8) & 3.8 (2.0) & 0.2 (1.0) & 0.8 & 2/84/14 \\ _Ankle.InvEv.A_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 3.6 (1.3) & 1.0 (0.9) & \(-\)2.6 (0.6) & 0.6 & 100/0/0 \\ _Chest.Tilt.H_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 2.8 (1.5) & 1.9 (1.0) & \(-\)0.9 (0.7) & 0.7 & 68/32/0 \\ _Chest.Tilt.A_ (\({}^{\circ}\)) & 2.7 (1.3) & 1.5 (1.1) & \(-\)1.2 (0.6) & 0.6 & 96/4/0 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  \(SD\): Standard deviation. \(\delta\): MBD threshold. _X\(\mathit{diff}\):_ difference of means. _Clifj_: Confidence interval of the differences at a 95% confidence interval. \(\mathit{A}\): pathological or affected side. \(\mathit{H}\): healthy or non-affected side. \(\mathit{N}\): Probabilities of negative changes. \(\mathit{T}\): Probabilities of trivial changes. \(\mathit{P}\): Probabilities of positive changes. Note that the \(N\), \(T\), and \(P\) terms shown in Table 3 were the result of the statistical comparison using the MBD approach, and their meanings were included in Figure 2 and the related paragraphs in the previous section. Table 3 includes the change between the pre- and post-series of the analyzed variables in one single patient (patient S014), the threshold \(\delta\), and the MBD numerical results (i.e., the \(N\), \(T\), and \(P\) values). Figure 3 uses the confidence interval representation (see terminology used in Figure 2) to show the information included in Table 3. The grey areas represent the threshold (\(-\delta\), \(+\delta\)), and the black lines illustrate the change.