## 4 Results and Analysis
### Questionnaire Data Results and Analysis
#### 4.3.3 Psychological Correlation with Place Identity  
To verify the validity of H3, a two-variable Pearson correlation analysis was carried out between the aesthetic evaluation scores of the different visual elements of the landscape architecture seen from the observation decks and the psychological dimensions of place identity. Moreover, the aesthetic evaluation indexes and data for visual elements with a direct correlation with the psychology of place identity were screened out (Table 5). From the results in Table 5, we can draw the following conclusions: \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Landscape** & **Evaluation** & **Trigger** & **Sense of** & **Emiliarity** & **Environmental** & **Cultural** & **Intimacy** & **Place** \\
**Elements** & **Factor** & **Memories** & **Belonging** & **Familiarity** & **Preferences** & **Atmosphere** & **1 dentity** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{landmarks} & cleanliness & 0.464 & 0.622 * & 0.479 & 0.556 * & 0.464 & 0.643 ** & 0.530 * \\ \cline{2-10}  & vividness of color & 0.698 ** & 0.667 ** & 0.589 ** & 0.603 ** & 0.620 ** & 0.644 ** & 0.698 ** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{low-rise buildings} & proportional harmonization & 0.532 * & 0.428 & 0.539 * & 0.401 & 0.401 & 0.583 * & 0.420 \\ \cline{2-10}  & cleanliness & 0.572 * & 0.646 ** & 0.745 ** & 0.510 * & 0.552 * & 0.541 * & 0.521 * \\ \cline{2-10}  & vividness of color & 0.487 & 0.452 & 0.344 & 0.490 & 0.534 * & 0.509 * & 0.561 * \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{high-rise buildings} & cleanliness & 0.707 ** & 0.580 * & 0.712 ** & 0.467 & 0.509 * & 0.672 ** & 0.534 * \\ \cline{2-10}  & vividness of color & 0.454 & 0.681 ** & 0.372 & 0.656 ** & 0.589 * & 0.733 ** & 0.645 ** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{skyscraper buildings} & morphological richness & 0.377 & 0.482 & 0.551 * & 0.445 & 0.390 & 0.429 & 0.396 \\ \cline{2-10}  & cleanliness & 0.471 & 0.500 * & 0.462 & 0.343 & 0.528 * & 0.463 & 0.493 \\ \cline{2-10}  & vividness color & 0.548 * & 0.616 ** & 0.409 & 0.638 ** & 0.577 * & 0.730 ** & 0.648 ** \\ \cline{2-10}  & quantitative intensity & 0.426 & 0.460 & 0.513 * & 0.460 & 0.431 & 0.505 * & 0.514 * \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{water} & proportional harmonization & 0.584 * & 0.633 ** & 0.637 ** & 0.581 * & 0.593 * & 0.580 * & 0.587 * \\ \cline{2-10}  & morphological richness & 0.550 * & 0.629 ** & 0.667 ** & 0.594 * & 0.479 & 0.706 ** & 0.510 * \\ \cline{2-10}  & cleanliness & 0.411 & 0.382 & 0.611 ** & 0.505 * & 0.407 & 0.554 * & 0.504 * \\ \cline{2-10}  & vividness of color & 0.569 & 0.770 ** & 0.700 ** & 0.737 ** & 0.665 ** & 0.837 ** & 0.706 ** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{mountains} & proportional harmonization & 0.660 ** & 0.678 ** & 0.742 ** & 0.580 * & 0.574 * & 0.765 ** & 0.590 * \\ \cline{2-10}  & cardinaliness & 0.262 & 0.441 & 0.439 & 0.359 & 0.290 & 0.594 * & 0.445 \\ \cline{2-10}  & vividness of color & 0.540 * & 0.670 ** & 0.366 & 0.713 ** & 0.628 ** & 0.704 ** & 0.690 ** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{green plants} & proportional harmonization & 0.313 & 0.423 & 0.249 & 0.376 & 0.334 & 0.533 * & 0.444 \\ \cline{2-10}  & morphological richness & 0.650 ** & 0.655 ** & 0.726 ** & 0.565 * & 0.516 * & 0.733 ** & 0.579 * \\ \cline{2-10}  & cleanliness & 0.369 & 0.449 & 0.536 * & 0.383 & 0.371 & 0.568 * & 0.394 \\ \cline{2-10}  & vividness of color & 0.666 ** & 0.779 ** & 0.513 * & 0.702 ** & 0.680 ** & 0.834 ** & 0.754 ** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* Represents \(p\) < 0.01, which is significantly correlated at the 0.01 level.
* Represents \(p\) < 0.05, which is significantly correlated at the 0.05 level.  
\end{table} 
Table 5: Biased correlation analysis of aesthetic evaluation of visual elements and place identity. 1. There were 10 visual aesthetic evaluation indexes with a 0.05 level of significance for place identity psychology and six visual evaluation factors with a 0.01 level of significance for place identity psychology. 2.