# Perceptual Similarities between Artificial Reverberation Algorithms and Real Reverberation
## 4 Results
### Statistical Analysis
#### 4.2.2 Post Hoc Test
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Reverberation Time** & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**DFDN**} & **FDN** & **[PERSON]** & **[PERSON]** & **HMS** & **[PERSON]** \\
**0.95 s** & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**Female singing**} & **[PERSON]** & 0.791 & * 0.006 & * 0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **DFDN** & & * 0.013 & * 0.003 & * 0.002 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **FDN** & & & 0.622 & 0.596 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.006 \\  & **[PERSON]** & & & 0.970 & * 0.003 & * 0.025 \\  & **[PERSON]** & & & & * 0.003 & * 0.028 \\  & **HMS** & & & & & 0.458 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**Male speech**} & **Dattoro** & 0.599 & 0.086 & 0.064 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **DFDN** & & 0.025 & * 0.017 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **FDN** & & & 0.893 & * 0.042 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **Gardner** & & & & 0.058 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **Moorer** & & & & & 0.045 \\  & **HMS** & & & & & 0.045 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**Drum**} & **Dattoro** & 0.599 & 0.086 & 0.064 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **DFDN** & & * 0.025 & * 0.017 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **FDN** & & & 0.893 & * 0.042 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **Gardner** & & & & 0.058 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **Moorer** & & & & & 0.045 & 0.109 \\  & **HMS** & & & & & 0.684 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**Drum**} & **Dattoro** & 0.247 & 0.118 & 0.218 & * 0.023 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.002 \\  & **DFDN** & & * 0.007 & * 0.017 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **Gardner** & & & & 0.294 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **[PERSON]** & & & & & 0.018 \\  & **HMS** & & & & & 0.114 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note. – 1 Values marked with * indicate significant differences.  
\end{table} 
Table 14: Post hoc test results for medium reverberation time (0.95 s). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Reverberation Time** & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**DFDN**} & **FDN** & **Gardner** & **[PERSON]** & **HMS** & **[PERSON]** \\
**0.266 s** & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**Female singing**} & **[PERSON]** & 0.052 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **DFDN** & & 0.141 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(0.006\) & * \(0.009\) & * \(0.004\) \\  & **FDN** & & * 0.002 & 0.197 & 0.249 & 0.151 \\  & **[PERSON]** & & & & 0.068 & 0.050 & 0.094 \\  & **[PERSON]** & & & & 0.891 & 0.884 \\  & **HMS** & & & & & 0.777 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**Female singing**} & **[PERSON]** & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **DDTON** & & 0.132 & 0.451 & 0.956 & * \(0.015\) & 0.451 \\  & **FDN** & & & 0.453 & 0.119 & 0.354 & 0.453 \\  & **Gardner** & & & & 0.418 & 0.094 & 1.000 \\  & **Moorer** & & & & & * \(0.013\) & 0.418 \\  & **HMS** & & & & & 0.094 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{**Drum**} & **[PERSON]** & 0.110 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 & * \(<\)0.001 \\  & **DFDN** & & 0.086 & 0.072 & * \(0.038\) & * \(0.017\) & 0.662 \\  & **FDN** & & & 0.936 & 0.720 & 0.509 & 0.200 \\  & **Gardner** & & & & 0.780 & 0.561 & 0.173 \\  & **Moorer** & & & & & 0.762 & 0.101 \\  & **HMS** & & & & & 0.052 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note. – 1 Values marked with * indicate significant differences.  
\end{table} 
Table 13: Post hoc test results for short reverberation time (0.266 s).