## 9 Implications and Suggestion for Future Research  
First, in terms of managerial implications, this study identified a few essential managerial implications that could be practiced by leaders in the managerial levels of financial and business organizations and serve as guidelines for managers and decision-makers to enhance cybersecurity awareness among individuals in the financial organization and reduce or eliminate the expected future risk of cyberattacks. Reaffirming the role played by successful cybersecurity leadership, the role of leaders in the financial organizations lies in several important tasks, including: (a) strategic planning that ensures the protection of the organization and its personnel from cyberattacks, (b) continuous evaluation and monitoring of expected security gaps within financial organization or among individuals of the organization, (c) enculturation of cybersecurity awareness, technical skills and cybersecurity practical knowledge in the employees' mindset through setting, monitoring and evaluating some cybersecurity indicators and components, (d) the effective contribution of leaders and decision-makers in the financial organization in the development of financial organization cybersecurity policy and regulation, which are directly concerned with promoting awareness of cybersecurity among individuals within the financial organization and, and (f) frequent support for cybersecurity training programs and supervising the implementation of training programs among members of the financial organization. Second, regarding theoretical implications, in addition to employing and examining protection motivation theory-based cyberattack preventive measures, this research also introduces and examines newly emerging cyberattack preventive measures that are highly relevant to the banking industry and that can be applied to other financial institutions and large business corporations. The new proposed preventive measures variables, which were derived from related studies presented in three variables, are as follows: two independent variables, (a) frequent organization training, (b) frequent government alerting, and (c) cybersecurity leadership as a mediating variable. Future research could also predict new correlation and interaction among similar factors proposed in this study or suggest some additional relevant factors to be examined in similar context and different research environment. The third practical contribution, regarding the proposed and validated research framework beside testing and implementing motivation protection theory MPT, highlighted the importance of the three emerged variables named as government frequent alerting, organization cybersecurity frequent training and leadership cybersecurity to be in practice. Therefore, leaders who lead financial or business organizations are encouraged to exercise and learn some cybersecurity basic measures and skills to leverage and foster a more secure environment in their organizations. As an external protection measure, and in addition to their ongoing efforts to establish well-protected and -secured organizations, government should follow up the well-developed and updated policies that ensure all financial organizations and business organizations are practicing safe and secure work operations and transactions. Additionally, as an internal protection measure, leaders who lead financial or business organizations should encourage conducting more up-to-date cybersecurity frequent training among individuals in financial organizations on how to protect personal and related work data from being abused or misused through cyberattack practices. Although this study addressed a very essential concept about the cyberattack prevention model from an organizational and behavioral perspective, a few limitations might open other directions for more related future research.