## 4 Experiments and Results
### Results
#### 4.1.3 Case Study 2: Results of the Amateur Cyclist  
In Case Study 2, an amateur cyclist underwent the same interval training session as the professional due to a more realistic comparison between each other. This means that the male cyclist needs to overcome the interval training session consisting of a 1 min speed interval at 150 bpm followed by a 2 min recovery interval at 90 bpm. Research Question 2 (RQ-2) in Case Study 2 was set as: \"How to determine that the cyclist implementing the interval training session is not a professional by using the DT in cycling?\". The developing propositions, the case study design, and the performed data analysis were the same as in Case Study 1, while the criterion for accepting the proposition was asserted as follows: \"If the efficiency of the implemented interval training session is lesser than 90%, then the cyclist is not a professional\". The graphical results of the amateur cyclist are illustrated in Figure 5, where the meaning of the displayed variables is the same as by the professional cyclist. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Int.** & \(\overline{TRIMP}_{rec}\) & \(TRIMP_{rec}\) & \(\Delta TRIMP_{rec}\) & \(SR_{rec}\) \\ \hline
1 & 180 & 201.49 & 21.49 & 1.1194 \\
2 & 180 & 198.72 & 18.72 & 1.1040 \\
3 & 180 & 198.72 & 18.72 & 1.1040 \\
4 & 180 & 201.78 & 21.78 & 1.121 \\
5 & 180 & 203.48 & 23.48 & 1.1305 \\
6 & 180 & 196.55 & 16.55 & 1.0919 \\
7 & 180 & 203.18 & 23.18 & 1.1288 \\
8 & 180 & 200.25 & 20.25 & 1.1125 \\
9 & 180 & 190.69 & 10.69 & 1.0594 \\
10 & 180 & 177.66 & \(-\)2.34 & 0.9870 \\ \hline \hline \(\Sigma\) & 1800 & 1972.52 & 172.52 & 1.0958 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Professional cyclist results by interval recovery phase. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Int.** & \(\overline{TRIMP}_{spe}\) & \(TRIMP_{spe}\) & \(\Delta TRIMP_{spe}\) & \(SR_{spe}\) \\ \hline
1 & 150 & 136.53 & \(-\)13.47 & 0.9102 \\
2 & 150 & 146.91 & \(-\)3.09 & 0.9794 \\
3 & 150 & 137.01 & \(-\)12.99 & 0.9134 \\
4 & 150 & 146.31 & \(-\)3.69 & 0.9754 \\
5 & 150 & 138.23 & \(-\)11.77 & 0.9215 \\
6 & 150 & 139.40 & \(-\)10.60 & 0.9294 \\
7 & 150 & 139.34 & \(-\)10.66 & 0.9289 \\
8 & 150 & 144.53 & \(-\)5.47 & 0.9635 \\
9 & 150 & 131.97 & \(-\)18.03 & 0.8798 \\
10 & 150 & 126.39 & \(-\)23.61 & 0.8426 \\ \hline \hline \(\Sigma\) & 1500 & 1386.62 & \(-\)113.38 & 0.9244 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Professional cyclist results by interval speed intervals. As can be seen from Figure 5, the amateur cyclist did not achieve the demands of the sport trainer in the recovery interval. Although measured heart rate \(\overline{HR}\) strongly surpasses the proposed value of the speed interval \(\overline{HR}_{spe}\), the proposed value of the recovery interval \(\overline{HR}_{rec}\) is never achieved by the cyclist. The detailed analytical results of the implemented speed intervals by the amateur cyclist are presented in Table 5, from which it can be seen that the cyclist achieved even better results according to the TRIM load indicator in the speed intervals than the professional one. The efficiency of the professional training is even \(SR_{spe}=93.98\%\) in total. Unfortunately, the same cyclist failed to satisfy the demands of the sport trainer when the recovery intervals are observed (Table 6). The efficiency of the implementation is now only \(SR_{rec}=50.25\%\) in total. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Int.** & \(\overline{TRIMP}_{rec}\) & \(TRIMP_{rec}\) & \(\Delta TRIMP_{rec}\) & \(SR_{rec}\) \\ \hline
1 & 180 & 253.66 & 73.66 & 1.4092 \\
2 & 180 & 258.95 & 78.95 & 1.4386 \\
3 & 180 & 251.29 & 71.29 & 1.3961 \\
4 & 180 & 257.14 & 77.14 & 1.4286 \\
5 & 180 & 276.77 & 96.77 & 1.5376 \\
6 & 180 & 288.24 & 108.24 & 1.6013 \\
7 & 180 & 273.24 & 93.24 & 1.5180 \\
8 & 180 & 269.79 & 89.79 & 1.4988 \\
9 & 180 & 266.02 & 86.02 & 1.4779 \\
10 & 180 & 282.46 & 102.46 & 1.5692 \\ \hline \(\Sigma\) & 1800 & 2677.56 & 877.56 & 1.4875 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}