## 3 Results
### Analysis of Variance
The effect of mix aerobics was significantly greater compared to the effects of both kickboxing (\(p\) = 0.002) and step aerobics (\(p\) = 0.001). The effect of each group (mix aerobics, kickboxing, and step aerobics) on LDL was statistically significantly higher compared to the effect of the control group (\(p\) = 0.001). The effects of kickboxing and step aerobics did not significantly differ (\(p\) = 0.299). The effect of mix aerobics was significantly greater compared to the effects of both kickboxing (\(p\) = 0.001) and step aerobics (\(p\) = 0.037). The effect of each group (mix aerobics, kickboxing, and step aerobics) on cholesterol was statistically significantly higher compared to the effect of the control group (\(p\) = 0.001). The effects of kickboxing and step aerobics did not significantly differ (\(p\) = 0.055). The effect of mix aerobics was significantly greater compared to the effects of both kickboxing and step aerobics (\(p\) = 0.001). When the effect of measurement is not controlled, ANOVA shows no statistically significant difference in values for different groups of participants for all variables except triglycerides in the initial measurement (F \(\leq\) 2.017, \(p\)\(\geq\) 0.122 > 0.1). Therefore, all participants, regardless of whether they underwent any training, have statistically equal scores for the research variables in the initial measurement. It is notable that in the initial \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l c c c} \hline \hline
**Variable** & **Pairs** & **Mean Difference** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**95\% CI**} \\  & & & & **for the Mean** \\ \hline  & K-E1 & 6.19 ** & 1.34 & 11.03 \\ WC & K-E2 & 7.36 ** & 2.51 & 12.21 \\  & K-E3 & 8.63 ** & 3.78 & 13.47 \\ \hline MM\% & K-E2 & \(-\)2.15 * & \(-\)4.26 & \(-\)0.03 \\  & K-E3 & \(-\)2.29 * & \(-\)4.40 & \(-\)0.17 \\ \hline  & K-E1 & 0.13 ** & 0.11 & 0.15 \\  & K-E2 & 0.11 ** & 0.09 & 0.13 \\ TG & K-E3 & 0.08 ** & 0.06 & 0.10 \\  & K-E2 & \(-\)0.02 ** & \(-\)0.04 & 0 \\  & K1-E3 & \(-\)0.05 ** & \(-\)0.06 & \(-\)0.03 \\  & K2-E3 & \(-\)0.03 ** & \(-\)0.05 & \(-\)0.01 \\ \hline  & K-E1 & \(-\)0.23 ** & \(-\)0.27 & \(-\)0.19 \\  & K-E2 & \(-\)0.18 ** & \(-\)0.22 & \(-\)0.14 \\ HDL & K-E3 & \(-\)0.13 ** & \(-\)0.17 & \(-\)0.09 \\  & K-E2 & 0.05 ** & 0.02 & 0.09 \\  & E1-E3 & 0.11 ** & 0.07 & 0.14 \\  & E2-E3 & 0.05 ** & 0.01 & 0.09 \\ \hline  & K-E1 & 0.24 ** & 0.21 & 0.27 \\  & K-E2 & 0.19 ** & 0.17 & 0.22 \\ LDL & K-E3 & 0.21 ** & 0.18 & 0.24 \\  & E1-E2 & \(-\)0.05 ** & \(-\)0.08 & \(-\)0.02 \\  & E1-E3 & \(-\)0.03 * & \(-\)0.06 & 0 \\ \hline  & K-E1 & 0.43 ** & 0.40 & 0.47 \\  & K-E2 & 0.33 ** & 0.29 & 0.37 \\ TC & K-E3 & 0.37 ** & 0.33 & 0.40 \\  & K-E2 & \(-\)0.10 ** & \(-\)0.14 & \(-\)0.07 \\  & E1-E3 & \(-\)0.07 ** & \(-\)0.10 & \(-\)0.03 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* \(p\) = 0.05;
* \(p\) = 0.01; K-control group; E1—mix aerobics; E2—kickbox; E3—step aerobics; WC—waist circumference; MM%—muscle percentage; TSF-AB—skinid thickness (abdomen); TG—triglycerides; HDL—high-density lipoprotein; LDL—low-density lipoprotein; TC—total cholesterol.  
\end{table} 
Table 5: Post hoc test results for differences in effects between groups. Display of pairs for which a statistically significant difference was detected. measurement, the triglyceride score for participants in the mix aerobics group was significantly higher compared to the control group participants (\(p\) = 0.004). This, however, further emphasizes the effect of that training. In the final measurement, the training programs resulted in no significant differences between groups for body weight (F = 1.088, \(p\) = 0.362), body mass index (F = 1.295, \(p\) = 0.285), and skinfold of the arm (F = 1.226, \(p\) = 0.308). For the skinfold of the thigh, a statistically significant difference in values between at least two groups occurs, but only when the error probability is 10% (F = 2.219, \(p\) = 0.096), so the significance of the difference cannot be reliably asserted in this case.