## 3 Results
#### Analysis of Data Processing in Graphs  
The graphs are processed according to groups separately in pre and post-measurements of the Error Bar model. According to the data presented in Figure 1, we see a difference between the two groups and between the pre and post-measurement. In the presented figure, it can be seen that the post-measurement in (PG) showed the best results in relation to the pre-measurement and also showed significant differences in value (\(p\) < 0.05), while in (CG), we have a decrease in the result of speed 30 m, we also have no significant differences between the pre and post measurement. The statistical indicators are presented in Table 3, while the performance of the test is presented in Figure 1.  
At the speed of 80 m, PG showed the best performance in favor of the post-measurement; significant differences between the value measurements were presented (\(p\) < 0.05). While the CG has shown a drop in the result in the post-measurement in relation to the pre-measurement, in this case, we have no significant differences between the measurements in the CG. The statistical indicators are presented in Table 3, while the performance of the test is presented in Figure 2. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **Tests** & **VJT** & **SBJ** & **SJL** & **S30** & **S80** & **S100** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{VJT} & Pearson Correlation & 1.000 & 0.733 & 0.712 & \(-\)0.483 & \(-\)0.545 & \(-\)0.563 \\  & Sig. (2-tailed) &. & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{SBJ} & Pearson Correlation & 0.733 & 1.000 & 0.811 & \(-\)0.604 & \(-\)0.682 & \(-\)0.697 \\  & Sig. (2-tailed) & 0.000 & - & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{SJL} & Pearson Correlation & 0.712 & 0.811 & 1.000 & \(-\)0.541 & \(-\)0.609 & \(-\)0.630 \\  & Sig. (2-tailed) & 0.000 & 0.000 & - & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{S30 m speed} & Pearson Correlation & \(-\)0.483 & \(-\)0.604 & \(-\)0.541 & 1.000 & 0.797 & 0.770 \\  & Sig. (2-tailed) & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & - & 0.000 & 0.000 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{S80 m speed} & Pearson Correlation & \(-\)0.545 & \(-\)0.682 & \(-\)0.609 & 0.797 & 1.000 & 0.917 \\  & Sig. (2-tailed) & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & - & 0.000 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{S100 m speed} & Pearson Correlation & \(-\)0.563 & \(-\)0.697 & \(-\)0.630 & 0.770 & 0.917 & 1.000 \\  & Sig. (2-tailed) & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* S—sprint run; SBJ—Standing long jump; STJ—Standing triple jump; VJT—Vertical Jump.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: [PERSON]’s correlation between speed and explosive strength abilities according to pre and post-tests. In the speed 100-m test, we also have the highlighted results between PG and CG, especially in the post-measurement. PG scored a better result in the post-measurement, but the differences between the pre and post-measurements were not presented. Whereas in CG, we have a significant difference between pre and post-measurement (\(p<0.05\)). The statistical indicators are presented in Table 3, while the performance of the test is presented in Figure 3.  
Figure 1: Speed 30 m means between the PG and CG group. Figure 2: Speed 80 m means between the PG and CG groups. In Figure 4, we present the standing long jump test. Post-measurement in PG has a significant result in relation to prey and also in relation to CG in both measurements. If we look at the significant differences, CG has shown significant differences between the pre and post-measurement with a value (\(p<0.05\)), while PG with value (\(p<0.05\)). Figure 4: Standing long jump means between the PG and CG groups. Figure 3: Speed 100 m means between the PG and CG group. In Figure 5, we have presented the standing triple jump test. In this case, we see that PG has better results in the post-measurement in relation to the pre-measurement.