Several methods for enhancing the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams have been developed, with the most common being the addition of reinforced concrete jacketing, steel jacketing, and composite jacketing (fiber-reinforced polymers) [12; 13]. RC cladding is particularly effective in improving shear performance and is a relatively easy-to-apply reinforcement method [12]. It is also a well-established technique for retrofitting structural elements. The success of the jacketing process largely depends on achieving a strong bond between the old and new materials, with reinforced concrete being highly effective at the interface, making it a reliable material for U-shaped reinforcement of shear-critical beams [14]. Steel jacketing offers the advantage of requiring less space, being lightweight, and easy to install [13]. On the other hand, externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites have emerged as an efficient solution, enhancing bending, shear, torsion, and confinement capabilities. FRP composites are characterized by their low invasiveness, high strength-to-weight ratio, and ease of application [15]. Structural engineering has traditionally focused on achieving maximum safety with minimal investment. However, growing concerns about sustainability have elevated the importance of its three pillars: economic, environmental, and social. A circular economy (CE) presents a promising approach to addressing sustainability challenges by extending the useful life of the built environment through the retrofit and refurbishment of buildings and infrastructure [16]. In the building and construction industry, the economic dimension of sustainability has historically received the most attention, while environmental impacts have gained increasing research interest in recent years. Seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete buildings typically involves the production of new materials and implementing construction processes, contributing to the industry's already significant environmental impact. Given the large number of buildings with seismic deficiencies, these retrofitting activities may exacerbate negative environmental consequences [17]. Meanwhile, the social dimension of sustainability in the construction sector faces substantial challenges due to its relative development and lack of maturity [18]. Multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) are valuable tools for tackling complex engineering problems, particularly when selecting optimal solutions under conflicting criteria [19]. Multiple attribute decision-making methodologies (MADMs) have received much attention recently. MADMs have evolved into comprehensive operations research methods integrating computational and mathematical tools to identify optimal solutions [20]. MADMs enable a holistic assessment of safety and sustainability by addressing conflicting dimensions and criteria. Recent research has applied decision-making methods to rank seismic retrofitting alternatives, incorporating economic, functional, and environmental criteria. These studies include contributions from references [21; 22; 23; 24; 25]. However, many building retrofit studies lack social life cycle analysis, leaving a significant gap. Despite the availability of advanced MADMs, their application in seismic retrofit remains limited [26]. Classical decision-making methods continue to dominate the research landscape. With the proliferation of innovative decision-making approaches in recent years, there is considerable potential to improve accuracy and applicability, offering robust solutions to current challenges. The term \"postpone effect\" aptly describes the state of the field, reflecting the lag in adopting and applying modern MCDMs in research [27]. The scientific community has made significant strides in utilizing MCDM methods to select optimal seismic retrofitting alternatives. However, there is still a need to thoroughly explore retrofit strategies with a holistic approach that can effectively minimize seismic risk.