## 4 Results
### Results of the Multi-Criteria Analysis
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline
**DR** & **Fuzzy** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Reciprocal of**} \\
**Enabling** & **Geometric** & **Fuzzy Geometric** & **Fuzzy Weights** & **Defuzzified** & **Normalized** & **Rank** & **Included/Excluded** \\
**Element** & **Mean** & **Mean Summation** & **Weights** & **Weights** & **Rank** & **Included/Excluded** \\ \hline
**DR3** & (1.84,2.39,2.97) & \(\times\)\(\left(\frac{1}{12,32},\frac{1}{9,7.88},\frac{1}{7.56}\right)\) & (0.15,0.244,0.393) & 0.2621 & 0.2424 & 2 & Included \\ \hline
**DR4** & (0.91,1.16,1.51) & \(\times\)\(\left(\frac{1}{12,32},\frac{1}{9,7.88},\frac{1}{7.56}\right)\) & (0.074,0.118,0.2) & 0.1305 & 0.1207 & 4 & Included \\ \hline
**DR5** & (0.61,0.79,1.06) & \(\times\)\(\left(\frac{1}{12,32},\frac{1}{9,7.88},\frac{1}{7.56}\right)\) & (0.049,0.08,0.14) & 0.0899 & 0.0832 & 5 & Excluded \\ \hline
**DR6** & (0.30,36.05) & \(\times\)\(\left(\frac{1}{12,32},\frac{1}{9,7.88},\frac{1}{7.56}\right)\) & (0.024,0.037,0.059) & 0.0401 & 0.0371 & 6 & Excluded \\ \hline
**DR7** & (0.21,0.25,0.3) & \(\times\)\(\left(\frac{1}{12,32},\frac{1}{9,7.88},\frac{1}{7.56}\right)\) & (0.017,0.025,0.04) & 0.0273 & 0.0252 & 7 & Excluded \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 13: _Cont._Using Equations (11) and (12), \(d_{i}^{*}\) and \(d_{i}^{-}\) were calculated respectively, and CCi was calculated accordingly using Equation (14). Table 17 shows the CCi value for each enabling element and its associated rank. DT2 (Industry 4.0 enabling technologies) ranked first as the most effective enabling element for the digital infrastructure supporting project management success, followed by DF2, DT1, DR3, DF1, DR4, DR1, and DR2, respectively. The average CCi value was calculated for each digital pillar in Table 18. The digital pillars were ranked accordingly, showing that Digital Tools ranks first, then Digital Fitness, and lastly Digital Readiness. Moreover, the relative weights were calculated based on the CCi for each enabling element, and the digital pillars were ranked accordingly. Digital Tools ranked first, followed by Digital Fitness, and lastly Digital Readiness, which presented the same ranking obtained as a result of the average CCi. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Alternative**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Enabling Element**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Normalized**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Average CCi**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Digital Pillar**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Digital Pillar**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Digital Pillar Rank**} \\  & & Weight Based & & & & **Average CCi** \\ \hline DR1 & \begin{tabular}{c} Cybersecurity \\ Systems \\ \end{tabular} & 0.02198 & & & & \\ \hline DR2 & \begin{tabular}{c} Realtime Data Access \\ and Management \\ \end{tabular} & 0.014733 & & & & \\ \hline DR3 & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Technological \\ Infrastructure \\ \end{tabular} & 0.110229 & 0.160229 & 3 & 0.175973 & 3 \\ \hline DR4 &
\begin{tabular}{c} Large Internet \\ Capacity \\ \end{tabular} & 0.02903 & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 18: Average CCi for enabling elements based on the associated digital pillar, and its rank. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Enabling Element**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**\(\mathbf{d^{*}}\)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(\mathbf{d^{-}}\)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**CCi**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Rank**} \\  & & & & & \\ \hline
**DR1** & 0.197689 & 0.017203 & 0.080053 & 7 \\ \hline
**DR2** & 0.202653 & 0.011491 & 0.05366 & 8 \\ \hline
**DR3** & 0.13244 & 0.088836 & 0.40147 & 5 \\ \hline
**DR4** & 0.193519 & 0.02288 & 0.105732 & 6 \\ \hline
**DT1** & 0.041899 & 0.174437 & 0.806326 & 3 \\ \hline
**DT2** & 0.02153 & 0.190788 & 0.898595 & 1 \\ \hline
**DF1** & 0.126904 & 0.100371 & 0.441627 & 4 \\ \hline
**DF2** & 0.031799 & 0.187003 & 0.854668 & 2 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 17: Distance of enabling elements (alternatives) from FIPS (\(\mathbf{d^{*}}\)) and FINS (\(\mathbf{d^{-}}\)), CCi, and ranks.