## 3 Results
### Inter-Rater Reliability  
The Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCabsolute) ranged from 0.519 to 0.915 for trial 1 and 0.603 to 0.909 for trial 2 (see Tables 5 and 6). All ICC values indicated good or moderate inter-rater reliabilities. SEM was 0.09-0.29 for both trial 1 and 2, while SDC was 0.22-0.80 N/kg for trial 1 and 0.25-0.81 N/kg for trial 2. The SDC% values ranged from 8.75% to 26.74% for trial 1 and 10.17% to 26.85% for trial 2. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Measures** (**N/W**)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Trial 1**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Trial 2**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Bland-Altman**} & & & & \\ \cline{2-13}
**(N/W)** & **Mean** & **SD** & **Mean** & **SD** & **MDA** & **SD** & **95\% LoA** & **ICC** & **95\% CI** & **SEM** & **SDC95** & **SDC\%** \\ \hline
**FLDMPT60** & 1.46 & 0.25 & 1.50 & 0.25 & -0.02 & 0.12 & -0.26 + 0.22 & 0.640 & 0.404.0796 & 0.08 & 0.24 & 15.89 \\
**EXDMPT60** & 3.30 & 0.37 & 3.20 & 0.54 & 0.01 & 0.30 & -0.58 + 0.60 & 0.516 & 0.241.0716 & 0.21 & 0.59 & 18.09 \\
**F1 NDMPT60** & 1.42 & 0.23 & 1.43 & 0.28 & -0.01 & 0.19 & -0.38 + 0.36 & 0.734 & 0.438.0813 & 0.13 & 0.37 & 26.13 \\
**EXDMPT60** & 3.10 & 0.64 & 3.16 & 0.55 & -0.06 & 0.39 & -0.82 + 0.70 & 0.786 & 0.624.0883 & 0.28 & 0.76 & 24.42 \\
**FLDMPT180** & 1.21 & 0.18 & 1.27 & 0.21 & -0.06 & 0.17 & -0.39 + 0.27 & 0.601 & 0.349.0772 & 0.12 & 0.33 & 26.87 \\
**EXDMPT180** & 2.47 & 0.28 & 2.52 & 0.31 & -0.05 & 0.14 & -0.32 + 0.22 & 0.876 & 0.767.0935 & 0.10 & 0.27 & 11.00 \\
**EXDMPT180** & 1.17 & 0.17 & 1.22 & 0.20 & -0.05 & 0.14 & -0.32 + 0.22 & 0.721 & 0.517.0846 & 0.10 & 0.27 & 22.96 \\
**EXDMPT180** & 2.48 & 0.38 & 2.53 & 0.37 & -0.05 & 0.16 & -0.36 + 0.26 & 0.901 & 0.813.0949 & 0.11 & 0.31 & 12.52 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* N: newton, W: Weight, FL: Flexion, EX: Extension, DM: Dominant, NDM: Non-Dominant, PT: Peak Torque, 60: 60\({}^{\circ}/s\), 180: 180\({}^{\circ}/s\), MD: Mean Difference; ICC: Absolute Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; SEM: Standard Error of Measurement; SDC95: Smallest Detectable Change at the 95% Confidence Interval. a: difference scores were calculated by subtracting Trial 1 from Trail 2.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: Intra-rater reliability of new dynamometer. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Measures** (**N/W**)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Trial 1**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Trial 2**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Bland-Altman**} & & & & \\ \cline{2-13}  & **Mean** & **SD** & **Mean** & **SD** & **MDA** & **SD** & **95\% LoA** & **ICC** & **95\% CI** & **SEM** & **SDC95** & **SDC\%** \\ \hline
**FLDMPT60** & 1.51 & 0.24 & 1.52 & 0.26 & -0.02 & 0.12 & -0.26 + 0.22 & 0.888 & 0.7940.940 & 0.08 & 0.24 & 15.52 \\
**EXDMPT60** & 3.06 & 3.47 & 0.40 & -0.01 & 0.28 & -0.55 + 0.54 & 0.681 & 0.4590.822 & 0.20 & 0.59 & 17.91 \\
**FLNDMPT60** & 1.45 & 0.26 & 1.49 & 0.25 & -0.04 & 0.12 & -0.28 + 0.20 & 0.863 & 0.7790.939 & 0.08 & 0.24 & 16.00 \\
**EXDMPT60** & 2.91 & 0.45 & 3.00 & 0.53 & -0.08 & 0.31 & -0.69 + 0.53 & 0.788 & 0.6270.885 & 0.22 & 0.61 & 20.56 \\
**FLNDMPT180** & 1.24 & 0.19 & 1.29 & 0.22 & -0.05 & 0.16 & -0.36 + 0.26 & 0.659 & 0.4310.808 & 0.11 & 0.31 & 24.79 \\
**EXDMPT180** & 2.46 & 0.27 & 2.49 & 0.31 & -0.04 & 0.12 & -0.28 + 0.20 & 0.911 & 0.8310.954 & 0.08 & 0.24 & 9.50 \\
**FLNDMPT180** & 1.21 & 0.20 & 1.25 & 0.21 & -0.04 & 0.13 & -0.29 + 0.21 & 0.785 & 0.6160.884 & 0.09 & 0.25 & 20.72 \\
**EXDMPT180** & 2.44 & 0.32 & 2.47 & 0.35 & -0.04 & 0.12 & -0.28 + 0.20 & 0.928 & 0.8640.963 & 0.08 & 0.24 & 9.58 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* N: newton, W: Weight, FL: Flexion, EX: Extension, DM: Dominant, NDM: Non-Dominant, PT: Peak Torque, 60: 60\({}^{\circ}/s\), 180: 180\({}^{\circ}/s\), MD: Mean Difference; ICC: Absolute Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; SEM: Standard Error of Measurement; SDC95: Smallest Detectable Change at the 95% Confidence Interval. a: difference scores were calculated by subtracting Trial 1 from Trail 2.  
\end{table}