## 3 Results
### Rescue  
The rescue scenario is characterized by the fact that the objective of the task is the rescue of the victims. In general, the results collected in Figure 8 and Table 6 indicate that the average frequency with which awareness modules should appear in the rescue scenario is higher than in the survival scenario. Tools that help to identify victims (_Signs of life_, _Robust vision_, _Wireless finder_, _Radar_ and _People_) should appear _Constantly_. Figure 9 extends these results grouping them by mission task and confirms that regardless of the profiles, the modules that should appear constantly are those previously indicated. For the rest of the modules, there are divided opinions: they should appear _\"Constantly\"_ or _\"Only if there is anomaly info\"_.  
Figure 8: Appearing frequency results corresponding to all participants in rescue mode. The number of modules that should appear in rescue circumstances has increased to nine modules according to most profiles (see Table 7 and Figure 10). Firefighters would reduce this number to 8, and Hazmat Incident FRs would increase to it 10. However, the variability of the responses indicates that the number of modules to be displayed in the interface could be reduced to 6 or up to 14 modules depending on the different users. According to the average order of priority they would assign to each module (summarized in Table 8 and Figure 11), the priority modules would be _People_, _Signs of life_, _Radar_ and _Signs of life_. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Awareness Module** & **Mean** & **Std** \\ \hline Signs of life & 2.76 & 0.43 \\ Robust vision & 2.69 & 0.57 \\ Wireless finder & 2.60 & 0.49 \\ Radar & 2.58 & 0.50 \\ People & 2.51 & 0.72 \\ C2-FR connection & 2.44 & 0.60 \\ Heart rate & 2.35 & 0.64 \\ Battery level & 2.33 & 0.47 \\ Death rate & 2.29 & 0.63 \\ Augmented olfaction tool & 2.15 & 0.76 \\ Temperature, humidity & 2.15 & 0.62 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Statistics of appearing frequency results corresponding to all participants in rescue mode. Figure 10: Number of awareness modules according to mission types in rescue mode. Figure 9: Appearing frequency results categorized according to mission types in rescue mode. and _Robust vision_, following that order, and the tools that provide information, contextual, temperature or battery level would be the lowest priority. Looking at these results grouped by task in Figure 12 and quantified in Table 9, the prioritization of the modules varies quite a lot according to the different tasks. The _People_, _Radar_ and _Signs of life_ modules are the most prioritized tools in all cases; the _Augmented olfaction_ module is important for EMS and Hazmat Incident FRs, while not for the rest, and inversely with _C2-FR connection_ and _Heart rate_; _Robust vision_ is quite high priority for all but EMS FRs, while _Wireless finder_ is essential only for Hazmat Incidents. The lowest priorities overall are _Battery level_, contextual information (ambient _Temperature_, _humidity_) and _Breath rate_. The distribution of weighted priorities is more evident in the graphs in Figure 12(a)-e, where the visual analysis is performed by task. Figure 13: Awareness module importance distribution defined by a contraction metric inversely proportional to the pondered priority quantities displayed in Table 9 for each FR rescue mission.