## 3 Results
### Physical Performance Tests  
In terms of sports performance, it can be observed (Table 3) that in basketball there was an improvement in 77% of the T2 tests. In volleyball, on the other hand, although there was an improvement in several results, it can be seen that improvements were smaller than those in the previous discipline, with a difference of 10%.  
At the percentage level, the greatest changes observed were centered on the intermittent endurance test, with an increase in the results of 68.485% and 28.505%, respectively. In turn, we can observe that in SJ there is an increase of 11.524% in basketball and a decrease of 4.002% in volleyball (Figure 3). In CMJ there was an increase of 10.564% in basketball and a decrease of 3.101% in volleyball; in DJ there was an increase of 13.055% in basketball and an increase of 3.520% in volleyball; and in Yoyo IRT there was an increase of 63.485% in basketball and an increase of 28.505% in volleyball.  
There were no significant differences (\(p>0.05\)) between groups and between times for either body parameters or performance tests.  
Strong correlations (Figure 3) were found at the intergroup level, greater than or equal to 0.50 of 19.444% of %AM and %FMM with CMJ, ABK, 20m, and agility. A high correlation was shown of endomorphy with CMJ (r1: \(-\)0.6270; r2: \(-\)0.5050), and of mesomorphy with medicine ball throwing (r1: 0.5403; r2: 0.5814). At the intragroup level in basketball, we found a strong correlation, greater than or equal to 0.5 of 52.778% of %FMM with SJ, CMJ, ABK, DJ, medicine ball throw, 20 m, RSA, agility, and Yo-yo IRT II. A high correlation was also found of %FMM with CMJ, DJ, RSA, agility, and Yo-yo IRT II; of endomorphy with SJ (r1: \(-\)06373), CMJ (r1: \(-\)0.6269; r2: \(-\)0.5928), ABK (r1: \(-\)0.5711), DJ (\(-\)0.6463; \(-\)0.6516), medicine ball throw (r1: 0.5338; 0.5687), 20m (r1: 0.5808), RSA (r1: 0.6093; r2: 0.7861), agility (r2: 0.5594), and Yo-yo IRT II (r1: \(-\)0.5023; r2: 0.7407); and of mesomorphy with J and medicine ball throw (r1: 0.6656; r2: 0.6229). In volleyball, the results of strong correlation, greater than and equal to 0.50, accounted for 23.611%, and were those of %AM with CMJ, medicine ball throwing, 20 m, RSA, and agility. There was a high correlation of %FMM with CJM, ABK, and 20 m; of the endomorphy with CMJ (r1: \(-\)0.6471), medicine ball throw  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **T1 (n = 12)** & **T2 (n = 12)** & **t** & **\%A** & \(p\)** & **n2p** & **Change Magnitude** & **Probabilistic Inference** \\ \hline SJ (cm) & 29.33 \(\pm\) 4.52 & 32.71 \(\pm\) 5.2 & 11.524 \(\pm\) 16.6 & 0.029* & \(-\)0.2767 & Small & Almost certain beneficial \\ \hline CMJ (cm) & 29.44 \(\pm\) 5.41 & 32.55 \(\pm\) 4.34 & \multirow{2}{*}{2.201} & \multirow{2}{*}{10.564 \(\pm\) 16.5} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.136} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.1358} & \multirow{2}{*}{Trivial} & \multirow{2}{*}{Almost certain beneficial} \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{5-5} ABK (cm) & 34.3 \(\pm\) 38.3 & 33.59 \(\pm\) 3.93 & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{5-5} DJ (cm) & 29.22 \(\pm\) 4.75 & 33.02 \(\pm\) 5.18 & & & & & \\ \cline{1-1} \cl  
At the intergroup level there was no correlation equal to or greater than 0.75. If we look at correlations greater than or equal to 0.75 in basketball, %AM was related to jumping at T1 (S): r = \(-\)0.7508 (very high); \(p\) = 0.0049 and with CMJ: r = \(-\)0.7544 (very high); \(p\) = 0.0046), and at T2 with running (RSA: r = 0.7738 (very high); \(p\) = 0.0031 and Yo-yo IRT II: r = \(-\)0.8090 (very high); \(p\) = 0.0014). The %FMM value is related to running and agility (RSA: r = \(-\)0.8051 (very high); \(p\) = 0.0016 and Illinois: r = \(-\)0.8243 (very high); \(p\) = 0.0010). It can also be seen in endomorphy with running (RSA: r = 0.7860 (very high); \(p\) = 0.0024). Volleyball showed a strong correlation with jumping (ABK: r = 0.8304 (very high); \(p\) = 0.0016).