## 3 Results and Discussion
Similarly, under SSP3-7.0, which predicts an average temperature of 14.05 \({}^{\circ}\)C and annual precipitation of 844 mm, the estimated decrease is 4.4%. Under the SSP2-4.5 scenario, which projects an average temperature of 12.7 \({}^{\circ}\)C and annual precipitation of 895 mm, the reduction is more modest at 1.6%. These results underline the significant impact of climate change on the suitability of land for grassland use, indicating a progressive decrease in the areas optimal for grassland use under increasing temperatures and variations in the projected precipitation regime. In the context of climate change, land use for grassland pasture will change significantly between 2020 and 2039 according to climate projections. The modeling based on the SSP1-2.6 scenario, which predicts an increase in precipitation to 936 mm and average temperature to 11 \({}^{\circ}\)C, indicates a reduction in the area in the very low favorability class by 23.3%. Similarly, under the SSP2-4.5 scenario, which predicts an average temperature of 12.75 \({}^{\circ}\)C and annual precipitation of 895 mm, the decrease in this category is 18.8%. At the same time, for the high and very high favorability classes, the SSP2-4.5 modeling shows an increase of 2.2%. These changes suggest a redistribution of favorable land for pasture use according to climatic developments, with the potential for improved grassland conditions in areas where the climate becomes more favorable at the expense of others. This study highlights the need to adapt land use strategies to new climatic conditions in order to optimize natural resource management in the context of projected climate change. In the case of orchards, the analysis shows a fluctuating variation in land favorability in the context of climate change (Figure 8). According to the SSP1-1.9 scenario, in the immediate future, the areas in the very low favorability class are expected to decrease by 3.4%. This decrease is even more pronounced under the SSP2-4.5 scenario, where a reduction of up to 6.4% is projected, given an average temperature of 12.7 \({}^{\circ}\)C and an annual precipitation of 895 mm. The low favorability class also shows a decrease of 5.1%. In contrast, for the high and very high favorability classes, there is a slight increase of up to 0.7% in the areas falling into these categories. This increase in favorability is particularly relevant in the context of the expected increase in temperature, given that the favorability assessment for orchards is made by averaging the favorability for species such as apple, pear, plum, and cherry (Figures 9-20). In particular, for the cherry, peach, and apricot species, which require higher temperature limits for optimal development and acceptable yields, the increase in the multiannual mean temperature has a beneficial impact. Thus, some plots that were previously classified in the high favorability class could move to the very high favorability class. This qualitative leap will also be reflected in the statistical analysis of the suitability of plots for orchard use, underlining the importance of adapting orchard management strategies to the new climatic conditions forecast. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Period** & **SSP1-1.9** & **SSP1-2.6** & **SSP2-4.5** & **SSP3-7.0** & **SSP5-8.5** \\ \hline
**AvgT 2020–2039** & 10.987 & 11.073 & 11.135 & 10.993 & 11.311 \\ \hline
**AvgT 2040–2059** & 11.272 & 11.588 & 11.757 & 11.977 & 12.443 \\ \hline
**AvgT 2060–2079** & 11.134 & 11.748 & 12.341 & 12.995 & 13.808 \\ \hline
**AvgT 2070–2099** & 10.983 & 11.679 & 12.750 & 14.057 & 15.408 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Annual mean temperature change from 2020 to 2099 according to climate scenarios. Figure 8: Variation in crops by favorability classes between 2020–2100 (the increase is indicated with green arrow, the decrease with red arrow and the maintenance with yellow arrow). Figure 19: Favorability for apricot in 2024. Figure 18: Favorability for peach in 2100.