## 3 Results  
Table 1 displays the information of the weekly averages for all derived-GPS variables by playing position. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline
**Playing Position** & **Frequency** & **wNBL** & **wTD** & **wSTD** & **wHSRd** & **wRS** \\
**(Sessions wk\({}^{-1}\))** & **(AU)** & **(m)** & **(m)** & **(m)** & **(m)** \\ \hline LDW & \(>\)3 & 547.24 (31.87) & 23,764.21 (3024.59) & 2053.02 (256.11) & 340.35 (89.83) & 72.89 (4.55) \\ CDF & \(>\)3 & 526.43 (60.57) & 21,809 (4391.51) & 1831.06 (370.15) & 271.55 (73.80) & 65.80 (9.06) \\ MID & \(>\)3 & 473.40 (96.46) & 20,002.31 (5203.42) & 1654.23 (508.09) & 230.78 (114.12) & 60.95 (14.43) \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Descriptive data of weekly average for all derived GPS variables by playing position. Figure 4: How to obtain the calculated information in each training session and matches. Figure 5 shows an overall vision of the wAW, wCW, and wACWR, variations across the full season by playing position. Overall, the highest wAW occurred in weeks 27, 9, and 5 for lateral defenders and wingers, central defenders and forwards, and midfielders, respectively. The lowest wAW happened in week 46 for the lateral defenders, wingers, and midfielders, while central defenders and forwards showed the lowest wAW in week 30 (Figure 5A). Concerning wCW, the highest outcomes were observed in weeks 30, 11, and 6 for lateral defenders and wingers, central defenders and forwards, and midfielders, respectively. The lowest wCW were found in weeks 42, 48, and 26 for lateral defenders and wingers, central defenders and forwards, and midfielders, respectively (Figure 5B). Besides, the highest wACWR happened in weeks 27, 22, and 5 for lateral defenders and wingers, central defenders and forwards, and midfielders, respectively. Coincidentally, all player groups showed the lowest wACWR in week 30 (Figure 5C). Figure 6 displays an overall vision of the wTM and wTS variations across the full season by play position. The highest wTM occurred in weeks 2, 34, and 12 for lateral defenders and wingers, central defenders and forwards, and midfielders, respectively, while the lowest wTM were observed in weeks 29, 30, and 11 for lateral defenders and wingers, central defenders and forwards, and midfielders, respectively (Figure 6A). Coincidentally, the highest wTS happened in week 2 for all player groups. Moreover, the lowest wTS were observed in week 46 for lateral defenders, wingers, central defenders, and forwards, while midfielders showed the lowest wTS in week 29 (Figure 6B). Between-group comparisons on wAW, wCW, wACWR, wTM, and wTS for the full season were displays in Table 2. These comparisons were conducted using the full season average for every dependent variable, which was calculated from the weekly average of each one. No significant differences in any variables were found when compare the different player groups. Table 3 shows the between-group comparisons for the full season average derived-GPS variables of distance and sprints, calculated from the weekly average of them. Results revealed small to very largely significantly higher wSTDs in lateral defenders and wingers compared to central defenders and forwards (\(p\) = 0.009; d = 1.63) and midfielders (\(p\) = 0.034; d = 1.55). Similar findings were found in wHSRd comparing lateral defenders and wingers with central defenders and forwards (\(p\) = 0.016; d = 1.48) and midfielders (\(p\) = 0.011; d = 1.77). Lateral defenders and wingers also showed small to very largely significantly higher wRSs compared to central defenders and forwards (\(p\) = 0.021; d = 1.47). Moreover, small to very largely significantly higher wSTD/wTDs and wHSRd/wTDs were observed in lateral defenders and wingers compared to central defenders and forwards (wSTD/wTDs: \(p\) = 0.017; d = 1.76; wHSRd/wTD: \(p\) = 0.014; d = 1.61).