## 5 Results  
### Results Obtained Using the WIT  
The selected features allowed us to conclude that Kasinka Mala belongs to submontane areas with agricultural activity, currently changing into recreational activity. On the basis of the WIT Site Significance Indicators, the following results were obtained (Table 1, Scheme 1). An attempt to evaluate and assess the landscape using the WIT method allows us to determine the scope of the normal, natural, and anthropogenic processes taking place in the studied area. Attention should be paid to the need for maintaining a certain distance to the obtained results. Numerical values are only an attempt to determine landscape changes in the studied area. Every element of the landscape changes to a certain degree; however, it is a subjective evaluation connected to some degree with intuition. The development of each area is a dynamic process. The changes are constantly occurring. They are caused by various factors and constantly affect the development or regress of each area. Valuation and assessment of landscape changes using the WIT method are useful for larger administrative units, namely, regions. The second object of the study was Kamionka Wielka; the application of the land relevance indicator (WIT) to assess the landscape for particular functions in this commune looks as follows (Table 2). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**No** & **Village** & **WIT 1** & **WIT 2** & **WIT 3** \\ \hline \(1\) & Bogusza & 6.68 & 11.21 & 17.67 \\ \hline \(2\) & Jamnica & 2.01 & 8.17 & 13.55 \\ \hline \(3\) & Kamionka Mala & 1.05 & 4.99 & 12.97 \\ \hline \(4\) & Kamionka Wielka & 0.55 & 14.69 & 24.80 \\ \hline \(5\) & Krölowa Görna & 9.33 & 11.50 & 20.42 \\ \hline \(6\) & Krölowa Polska & 5.17 & 8.37 & 15.07 \\ \hline \(7\) & Mszalnica & 4.23 & 9.54 & 12.72 \\ \hline \(8\) & Mystków & 0.74 & 10.90 & 15.69 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Calculated values of WIT. To determine the degree of \"significance\", a number between 0.3 and 1 was adopted for each of the features, where the value of 1 was adopted for the basic characteristics (e.g., soil bonitation for agriculture). The calculations were carried out according to Formula (1). Three indicators were obtained: WIT 1--for agricultural activity, WIT 2--for non-agricultural activities, and WIT 3--for recreational activities for each of the eight villages of the Kamionka Wielka commune. WIT 1, WIT 2--coefficients calculated according to Formula (1). The calculation of the land relevance indicator for the Kamionka Wielka area enabled the identification of individual villages as the areas more or less suitable for agricultural, non-agricultural, or recreational activities. Figure 3 presents the calculated indicators WIT 1 and WIT 2 for the eight villages of the Kamionka Wielka commune. The results are presented in five intervals (below 4.00, 4.01-8.00, 8.01-12.00, 12.01-16.00, above 16). Figure 3 presents WIT 1, that is, agricultural activity for all villages of the Kamionka Wielka commune. The smallest value of WIT 1 is from the village Kamionka Wielka; it is 0.55. The highest value of WIT 1 (9.33) is from the Krolowa Gorna village. Most villages are in the range below 4.00, they are: Kamionka Wielka, Mystkow, Kamionka Mala, and Jamnica. A similar number of villages is in the range 4.01-8.00: Mszalnica, Krolowa Polska, and Bogusza. The remaining village, Krolowa Gorna, belongs to the range 8.01-12.00. When analyzing the results of WIT 1, it can be stated that the Kamionka Wielka commune is not suitable for agricultural activities due to the small number of farms. If there is agricultural activity, in most cases, it is for personal use. Another reason is the presence of escarments and slopes in the area, impeding agricultural activity, as well as a relatively large area of forests in relation to agricultural land. Figure 4 presents WIT 2--non-agricultural activity, which takes values in the range of 4.99 to 14.69.