## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline
**Interval of Classes in cm/km** & **Frequency of Corrections in Classes** & **Representation in [\%]** \\ \hline \(<\)\(-2.0\); \(-1.8\)\(>\) & 0 & 0.00 \\ \(<\)\(-1.8\); \(-1.6\)\(>\) & 1 & 0.00 \\ \(<\)\(-1.6\); \(-1.4\)\(>\) & 3 & 0.01 \\ \(<\)\(-1.4\); \(-1.2\)\(>\) & 8 & 0.04 \\ \(<\)\(-1.2\); \(-1.0\)\(>\) & 25 & 0.11 \\ \(<\)\(-1.0\); \(-0.8\)\(>\) & 89 & 0.39 \\ \(<\)\(-0.8\); \(-0.6\)\(>\) & 252 & 1.11 \\ \(<\)\(-0.6\); \(-0.4\)\(>\) & 625 & 2.75 \\ \(<\)\(-0.4\); \(-0.2\)\(>\) & 1263 & 5.55 \\ \(<\)\(-0.2\); \(0.0\)\(>\) & 2181 & 9.59 \\ \(<\)\(0.0\); \(0.2\)\(>\) & 3332 & 14.7 \\ \(<\)\(0.2\); \(0.4\)\(>\) & 4296 & 18.9 \\ \(<\)\(0.4\); \(0.6\)\(>\) & 4366 & 19.2 \\ \(<\)\(0.6\); \(0.8\)\(>\) & 3134 & 13.8 \\ \(<\)\(0.8\); \(1.0\)\(>\) & 1760 & 7.74 \\ \(<\)\(1.0\); \(1.2\)\(>\) & 819 & 3.60 \\ \(<\)\(1.2\); \(1.4\)\(>\) & 360 & 1.58 \\ \(<\)\(1.4\); \(1.6\)\(>\) & 155 & 0.68 \\ \(<\)\(1.6\); \(1.8\)\(>\) & 49 & 0.22 \\ \(<\)\(1.8\); \(2.0\)\(>\) & 13 & 0.06 \\ \(<\)\(2.0\); \(2.2\)\(>\) & 8 & 0.04 \\ \(<\)\(2.2\); \(2.4\)\(>\) & 1 & 0.00 \\ \(<\)\(2.4\); \(2.6\)\(>\) & 1 & 0.00 \\ \(<\)\(2.6\); \(2.8\)\(>\) & 0 & 0.00 \\ \(<\)\(2.8\); \(3.0\)\(>\) & 0 & 0.00 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Class frequencies of length corrections from deformation. Figure 9: Class frequencies of length corrections from deformation. Figure 10 is a graphical representation of the resulting standard deviations from the length correction average at each node. As in the case of the graphical plot of the resulting corrections, the standard deviations have been color-coded according to the values obtained and expressed as dots. It was not possible to determine the systematic behavior of the standard deviations. In Table 3, the standard deviation statistics from all nodes after 2 km are shown. In Table 4, the frequencies of the length corrections in each interval are displayed. In Figure 11, the frequencies from Table 4 are displayed. It can be seen that 99% of the standard deviations of the length corrections from the deformations of the coordinate \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline Average & 0.47 \\ Minimum & +0.01 \\ Maximum & +3.61 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Statistics representing the standard deviations from the length correction averages at the nodes in cm/km. Figure 10: A graphical representation of the resulting standard deviations from the length correction averages at each node [32]. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Interval of Classes in cm/km** & **Frequency of Standard Deviations in Classes** & **Representation in [\%]** \\ \hline \(<\)0.0; 0.2\(>\) & 3017 & 13.3 \\ \(<\)0.2; 0.4\(>\) & 7960 & 35.0 \\ \(<\)0.4; 0.6\(>\) & 5916 & 26.0 \\ \(<\)0.6; 0.8\(>\) & 3089 & 13.6 \\ \(<\)0.8; 1.0\(>\) & 1506 & 6.62 \\ \(<\)1.0; 1.2\(>\) & 623 & 2.74 \\ \(<\)1.2; 1.4\(>\) & 329 & 1.45 \\ \(<\)1.4; 1.6\(>\) & 151 & 0.66 \\ \(<\)1.6; 1.8\(>\) & 76 & 0.33 \\ \(<\)1.8; 2.0\(>\) & 31 & 0.14 \\ \(<\)2.0; 2.2\(>\) & 21 & 0.09 \\ \(<\)2.2; 2.4\(>\) & 10 & 0.04 \\ \(<\)2.4; 2.6\(>\) & 6 & 0.03 \\ \(<\)2.6; 2.8\(>\) & 2 & 0.01 \\ \(<\)2.3; 3.0\(>\) & 2 & 0.01 \\ \(<\)3.0; 3.2\(>\) & 1 & 0.00 \\ \(<\)3.2; 3.4\(>\) & 0 & 0.00 \\ \(<\)3.6; 3.8\(>\) & 0 & 0.00 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: The class frequencies of the standard deviations from the length correction averages at the nodes. system lie within the interval of up to +1.4 cm/km. The mean value of the standard deviations is approximately 0.2 cm/km.