## 3 Results (A Comparison of the Theoretical and Experimental Results)
Since there are no original experimental data on the activation energy U\({}_{0}\) and equilibrium concentrations of relaxers \(n_{0}\) for muscovite crystals, for comparison with the theory, we determined them using three methods to calculate the parameter U\({}_{0}\): 1--initial ascent method (Garlica-Gibson); 2--Heat Velocity Variation Method (Bohuna-Buta); 3--the method based on the calculation of relaxation time [1,4]. The experimental equilibrium concentration of relaxers was calculated from an expression for the static dielectric permeability of thermo-stimulated depolarization \(\varepsilon_{0}(\varepsilon_{S}-\varepsilon_{\infty})\mathrm{E}_{\mathrm{pol },0}=\frac{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}}=\sigma_{ \mathrm{ind}}\), where \(\varepsilon_{\infty}\) represents the high-frequency dielectric permeability of the crystal. When accumulated (during polarization in stationary electric field) on flat capacitor plates, the charge \(\mathrm{q}_{\mathrm{ind}}=\sigma_{\mathrm{ind}}\mathrm{S}\), is computed in an equal polarization time t\({}_{\mathrm{pol}}\), and the surface density of the charge induced in dielectric \(\sigma_{\mathrm{ind}}=\int_{0}^{\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{pol}}}\mathrm{j}_{\mathrm{ pol}}(\mathrm{t})\mathrm{dt}=\mathrm{P}_{\mathrm{pol}}\mathrm{\left(t_{ \mathrm{pol}}\right)}\approx\frac{n_{0}\mathrm{P}_{\mathrm{pol}}\mathrm{d} \mathrm{q}^{2}\delta_{0}^{2}}{12\mathrm{k}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{ pol}}}\), computed by an approximate formula of the classical dipole polarization theory \(\mathrm{P}_{\mathrm{pol}}\mathrm{\left(t_{\mathrm{pol}}\right)}\approx\frac{n _{0}\mathrm{P}_{\mathrm{pol}}^{2}\mathrm{P}_{\mathrm{pol}}\mathrm{d}}{38 \mathrm{k}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{pol}}}\) at \(\mathrm{p}_{0}=\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{q}\delta_{0}\), is the area below the curve corresponding to the individual experimental TSDC density maximum \(\sigma_{\mathrm{ind}}=\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{j}_{\mathrm{depol}}(\mathrm{t}) \mathrm{dt}=\frac{1}{c}\int_{\mathrm{T}_{0}}^{\infty}\mathrm{j}_{\mathrm{depol }}(\mathrm{T})\mathrm{dT}\). A comparison of TSDC spectra and activation energies implies that a maximum of 2, both crystalline sulfate and silicates, is caused by the relaxation of ion defects H\({}_{3}\)O\({}^{+}\), and a maximum of 6 is due to the formation of complexes \"vacancy + L-defect\" (VL) or \"vacancy + D-defect\" (VD) [1]. In [1], the activation energy of complexes VL (VD) is estimated to be equal to 0.4-0.5 eV, which is comparable to the results (Tables 1-4). The formation of complexes of interstitial molecules with L- and D-defects [1] is not excluded. The types of relaxers and their orientation are indicated in Tables 1-4. Ion OH\({}^{-}\) activation energies calculated from the infrared and combination scattering spectra [1,4] and obtained for a maximum of 5 in the TSDC density spectra (Tables 1-4). These coincide with the error range, so a maximum of 5 is associated with ion OH\({}^{-}\) relaxation. The low-temperature, first ordinal number in the TSDC density spectrum is strongly associated, as noted in Section 1 of this paper, with the tunneling of protons within and between anions. The third and fourth maxima weaken in amplitude when HBC-class crystals are calculated at temperatures of 373-473 K, wherein, when calculated to temperatures 473-573 K disappears at the fourth maximum and, at 873-1373, K disappears at the third maximum, which allows for them to be connected with the movement of dipole molecules' crystallizing (structural) water and adsorbed water (on bundles) [1,4].