## 3 Results
### Components of the New DPIA--FRIA Framework
#### 3.1.2 The FPIA Part of the Framework
**(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q12, Q68, or Q69, depending on the answer._  
Assessment Category 11: Evaluation, Auditing and Safeguarding  
The evaluation, auditing and safeguarding section encompasses a comprehensive evaluation of the mechanisms and strategies in place to ensure that the AI system is responsibly deployed and maintained. It scrutinizes the tools and processes for continuous auditing and the adequacy of the organization's resources to oversee the system's performance. Additionally, it addresses how the system's integrity, fairness, and effectiveness are safeguarded, the capacity to align algorithmic decisions with their intended objectives despite contextual changes, and the transparency in communicating audit frequency and outcomes to stakeholders. Adapted/enriched based on [44; 47]. * Accountability and review
* Have suitable tools been made available for the evaluation, audit, and protection of the AI system? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69 depending on the answer._
* Are there sufficient mechanisms to ensure the system's operation and outcomes remain accountable and transparent? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* What options exist for auditors and regulators to enforce formal actions related to the government's use of the AI system? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* How frequently and at what intervals should the AI system's use be reviewed? Does the organization have the appropriate personnel in place to carry out these evaluations? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* What processes can be implemented to ensure the system remains relevant and effective in the future? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* How can validation tools be implemented to confirm that decisions and actions continue to align with the system's purpose and objectives, even as the application context evolves? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* What safeguards are in place to maintain the system's integrity, fairness, and effectiveness throughout its lifecycle? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* Have the human capital and infrastructure requirements specified in Q72 and Q73 been fulfilled? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* For self-learning algorithms, have monitoring processes and systems been established (for example, concerning data drift, concept drift and accuracy)? **(D)**, \(\rightarrow\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._* 118. Are there adequate means to modify the system or change how it is used if it no longer serves its original purpose or goals? (**(D)**, \(\to\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* 119. Is there an external auditing and oversight mechanism in place? **(D)**, \(\to\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* 120. Is sufficient information provided about the system to enable external supervision? **(D)**, \(\to\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._
* 121. Is the audit frequency and practice clearly communicated? **(D)**, \(\to\)_DPIA: Q68 or Q69, depending on the answer._  
Assessment Category 12: Core Human Rights  
The core human rights section forms the means for assessing an AI system's alignment with fundamental rights, evaluating its legal compliance, the extent of rights' impact and the balance between its objectives and the potential infringement of rights. The corresponding questions are designed to determine if the system affects fundamental rights and to guide a structured conversation on whether such impacts can be prevented or mitigated, and under what circumstances any residual interference with these rights might be deemed acceptable. The FRAIA tool, used by the Dutch government in its Annex [44], outlines a range of rights based on the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI by the European Commission [25] and the EU Charter [26].