## 3 Results  
### Fatigue Recovery  
The changes in fatigue recovery after the DSWTT program are shown in Table 4.  
Glucose was not significantly different in the analysis of interaction effects between the groups and the measurement time, the main effect according to the measurement time. Lactic acid showed a significant difference in the interaction (\(p<0.001\)) between the group and the measurement time  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Item**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Groups**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Test**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Source**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**\(F\)-Value**} \\ \cline{3-3} \cline{5-6}  & & & **Pre-Exercise** & & & **Post-Treatment** \\ \hline Glucose & CG & 95.30\(\pm\)10.49 & 102.20 \(\pm\) 15.99 & 101.50 \(\pm\) 12.40 & Test & 2.132 \\ (mg/dL) & WEG & 96.50 \(\pm\) 9.05 & 103.00 \(\pm\) 18.79 & 99.30 \(\pm\) 13.40 & Group & 0.917 \\  & DWEG & 91.70 \(\pm\) 9.92 & 98.70 \(\pm\) 13.46 & 95.23 \(\pm\) 15.13 \({}^{\$}\) & Group \(\times\) Test & 0.130 \\ \hline Lactate acid & CG & 1.93 \(\pm\) 0.35 & 14.29 \(\pm\) 2.26 & 10.09 \(\pm\) 2.34 & Test & 163.629 & **exe** \\ (mmol/L) & WEG & 1.83 \(\pm\) 0.40 & 13.85 \(\pm\) 1.09 & 8.69 \(\pm\) 2.65 \({}^{\$}\) & Group & 1.031 & \\  & DWEG & 2.11 \(\pm\) 0.39 & 17.44 \(\pm\) 3.93 & 4.72 \(\pm\) 2.57 \({}^{\$}\) & Group \(\times\) Test & 13.307 & **exe** \\ \hline Ammonia & CG & 23.20 \(\pm\) 2.78 & 53.30 \(\pm\) 6.07 & 44.30 \(\pm\) 4.62 & Test & 176.681 & **exe** \\ (umo/L) & WEG & 21.50 \(\pm\) 3.37 & 50.70 \(\pm\) 6.94 & 39.60 \(\pm\) 7.64 \({}^{\$}\) & Group & 3.383 & * \\  & DWEG & 24.50 \(\pm\) 4.67 & 52.82 \(\pm\) 5.65 & 28.80 \(\pm\) 4.58 \({}^{\$}\) & Group \(\times\) Test & 22.487 & **exe** \\ \hline  & CG & 199.90 \(\pm\) 32.22 & 258.20 \(\pm\) 29.93 & 247.50 \(\pm\) 3.56 & Test & 12.196 & **exe** \\ LDH (U/L) & WEG & 189.80 \(\pm\) 34.38 & 249.50 \(\pm\) 31.92 & 234.30 \(\pm\) 33.92 & Group & 6.390 & **exe** \\  & DWEG & 178.40 \(\pm\) 34.81 & 252.30 \(\pm\) 21.83 & 158.80 \(\pm\) 31.77 \({}^{\$}\) & Group \(\times\) Test & 9.972 & **exe** \\ \hline Means \(\pm\) S.D., *: \(p<0.05\), **: \(p<0.01\), ***: \(p<0.001\), \({}^{\$}\): significantly different from CG, \({}^{\$}\): significantly different from within the group, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, CG: control group, WEG: water exercise group, DWEG: deep-sea water exercise group. & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 4: Changes in fatigue recovery parameters.  
Figure 3: Blood test.  
(\(p<0.01\)). However, there was no difference between the groups at the time of measurement. The post hoc analysis showed that DSWEG significantly decreased after program following maximum exercise (\(p<0.01\)), and WEG significantly decreased after CG (\(p<0.05\)).  
Ammonia showed a significant difference in the main effect of measurement (\(p<0.001\)) between groups within the measurement time (\(p<0.05\)), and the interaction effect (\(p<0.01\)) between the group and the measurement time. The post hoc analysis showed that DSWEG significantly decreased after the program following maximum exercise (\(p<0.01\)), and WEG significantly decreased after CG (\(p<0.05\)). LDH showed a significant difference in the main effect of measurement (\(p<0.001\)) between groups within the measurement time (\(p<0.01\)), and the interaction (\(p<0.01\)) between the group and the measurement time. The post hoc analysis revealed that DSWEG significantly decreased after the maximum exercise program in the CG and WEG (\(p<0.01\)).