## 3 Results
### Step 6: Final Report  
In the final report stage, the connectivity of the framework that has been developed throughout the study is demonstrated. Figure 6 presents a list of IDs generated during the STPA process. By applying the proposed framework, as shown in Figure 7, to these fundamental steps, the following results can be obtained. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Risk Level** & **Total Scenarios** & **Human Factors** & **Hardware** & **Software** & **Procedures** & **Environment** \\ \hline Extreme (20–25) & 12 & 12 & N/A & N/A & N/A & N/A \\ \hline Very high (15–16) & 7 & 1 & 4 & N/A & 2 & N/A \\ \hline High (10–12) & 13 & 7 & N/A & N/A & 4 & 1 \\ \hline Medium (4–9) & 56 & N/A & 7 & 34 & 14 & 1 \\ \hline low (3–4) & N/A & N/A & N/A & N/A & N/A & N/A \\ \hline Very low (1–2) & 12 & N/A & N/A & 12 & N/A & N/A \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: Summarize risk prioritization matrix results. Figure 6: A list of IDs generated during the STPA process. Figure 7: Final report with the proposed enhancements. For example, consider CA1: GCS Control (Controller: GCS Administration Module, Controlled Process: Ground Control System) and its associated unsafe control action UCA1-P-1: GCS Administration Module provides incorrect GCS control. This UCA is linked to hazards H-1, H-4, and H-6, as well as losses L-1, L-2, L-3, and L-6. Through the analysis of UCA1-P-1, a corresponding critical control command CC1-P-1 is derived: GCS Administration Module must always provide correct GCS control. Additionally, system safety constraints SSC-1, SSC-4, and SSC-6 are identified. By examining the causal factors and scenarios associated with UCA1-P-1, represented by HCF1-P-1-1 through HCF1-P-1-11, specific safety constraints (e.g., SC1-P-1) and recommendations (e.g., a, b, c) can be generated to mitigate the risks associated with incorrect GCS control. SC1-P-1-1: External information such as weather, geography, and flight restriction zones must be accurate and updated in real time to ensure correct GCS control commands are generated. * Implement an automated system for collecting and updating external information in real time. * Establish a dedicated team responsible for verifying and validating external information. * Develop a protocol for handling discrepancies or inconsistencies in external information. * Also, stakeholders can be connected and defined for roles such as:
* Local Government and Municipal Authorities
* Provide funding and resources for implementing the recommended automated systems, dedicated teams, and protocols (SC1-P-1-1a,b,c)
* Establish policies and guidelines for setting mission priorities and goals (SC1-P-1-4a)
* Facilitate coordination between relevant departments for smooth communication and cooperation (SC1-P-1-8a,b,c)
* Emergency Service Agencies (Fire Departments, Emergency Medical Services, etc.) * Participate in joint training and simulations to practice detecting and responding to changes in GCS status (SC1-P-1-11c)
* Collaborate with the UAS team to establish clear communication channels and protocols (SC1-P-1-7b)
* Provide input on mission objectives and situational changes to keep OMS administrators informed (SC1-P-1-7c)
* Department Personnel (Administrator, Pilot, Manager, etc.) * Undergo comprehensive training and certification on command entry, manipulation processes, and interpreting GCS status information (SC1-P-1-6a, SC1-P-1-10a)
* Adhere to standardized communication protocols and participate in joint training to improve communication and cooperation skills (SC1-P-1-8a,c)
* Regularly review and validate the GCS Administration Module's algorithms and decision-making logic (SC1-P-1-3c)
* Other Government Agencies (urban planning, transportation, public safety, etc.)