## 3 Results: Publication Analysis
### Relationships between Sense of Presence and the Study Variables
#### 3.4.3 Relationships between Sense of Presence and Conditions (Technology and User Profile)
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Ref.** & **Categories** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Human**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**HR Behavior**} \\ \cline{3-8}  & & & **Resposes (HR)** & & & & \\ \hline \multicolumn{8}{c}{**Conditions with Results**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Presence**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**HR is (\(<\) / \(\equiv\) / \(>\)) in (A) than in (B)**} \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{[60]} & \multirow{8}{*}{Condition} & \multirow{8}{*}{Tech,} & Emotional & \multirow{2}{*}{(Stereo)(6 Speakers)} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(>\)} & (Mono) \\  & & & Reaction & & & \\  & & & Emotional & & & \\  & & & Emotional & & & \\  & & & Reaction & & & & \\  & & & Reaction & & & & \\  & & & Reaction & & & & \\  & & & Spaciousness & & & & \\  & & & Proximity to & & & & \\  & & & music & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{[1]} & Scenario & MIP, & Sadness & \multirow{2}{*}{Cybersickness} & \multirow{2}{*}{(HMD)} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(>\)} & (Video) \\  & Condition & Tech, & Support (Display) & & & & \\ \cline{3-8}  & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{[12]} & Scenario & CMP, & Physical/Virtual & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} Serenity, \\ S.R. \\ Serenity \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{M} & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} (VR) \\ (High realism) \\ (High realism) + \\ (Natural) \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} \(>\) \\ (Low realism) + \\ (Low realism) + \\ (Natural) \\ \end{tabular} } \\  & Condition & Tech, & Hardware & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{[19]} & \multirow{8}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} \end{tabular} & \multirow{8}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} \end{tabular} } & Perceived spatial & \multirow{2}{*}{(Center)} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(>\)} & (Zoom \\  & & & depth & & & \\  & & Perceived spatial & & & & Out),(Right),(Left) \\  & & & depth & & & \\  & & Perceived spatial & & & & \\  & & & depth & & & & \\  & & & Perceived spatial & & & & \\  & & & Depth & & & \\  & & & Perceived spatial & & & & \\  & & & Perception & & & & \\  & & & Perceived & & & & \\  & & & Perceived & & & & \\  & & & Perception & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note. M: Moderator effect; CMP: Comparative; SR: Sense of Reality; En: Engagement; Nat: Naturalness; VF: Visual Field.  
\end{table} 
Table 15: _Cont._and spatialization. Study [59] also found a similar positive relationship for emotional responses and even the recognition of emotional responses. This again highlights the importance of auditory richness in evoking different determinants of presence. The authors of study [12] suggested that participants experienced greater serenity in environments with high graphic design, both in terms of the quality of textures and the number of polygons. However, the authors also pointed out that this relationship between affective states and graphic design quality can be mediated by the environment typology, in this case, outdoor or indoor environments. In addition, study [19] reported that the perception of spatial characteristics, such as greater accuracy in the perception of depth and spatial dimensions, can be moderated by joint manipulations of point of view, center of projection and display type. Together, these findings emphasize the importance of considering both visual and auditory technological attributes to comprehensively enhance key dimensions of the experience of presence in virtual environments. 4.4 Other Predictive Relationships between Sense of Presence and Behavioral Responses in Relation to the Built Environment  
Some research has established that notable relationships exist between sense of presence and its indicators and users' behavioral responses in the built environment.