# Bat Optimized Link State Routing Protocol for Energy-Aware Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks
## 5 Simulation and Result
### Experimental Results and Discussion
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Model**} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{**Node Speed**} \\ \hline
**Criterion** & **Protocol** & & **1** & **3** & **5** & **7** & **9** & **11** \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{\(\mathrm{PDR}\)} & \multirow{2}{*}{OLSR} & Mean & 96.79 & 90.46 & 82.7 & 72.41 & 67.35 & 65.4 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & SD & 6.28 & 15.48 & 3.03 & 11.90 & 5.04 & 10.00 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{EBOLSR} & Mean & 97.7 & 93.02 & 83.44 & 79.25 & 74.7 & 71.1 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & SD & 4.21 & 9.04 & 6.77 & 13.37 & 11.55 & 12.05 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{CAABO} & Mean & 98.16 & 95.31 & 84.89 & 79.98 & 75.23 & 73.35 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & SD & 5.33 & 7.07 & 1.76 & 11.10 & 1.54 & 9.75 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{BOLSR} & Mean & 98.55 & 96.3 & 86.1 & 81.5 & 77.8 & 75.3 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & SD & 7.49 & 11.34 & 8.34 & 11.53 & 6.91 & 12.22 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{\(\mathrm{E2E}\)} & \multirow{2}{*}{OLSR} & Mean & 16.32 & 24.67 & 28.21 & 33.41 & 39.21 & 47.11 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 7.97 & 2.71 & 11.01 & 0.90 & 3.23 & 4.14 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{EBOLSR} & Mean & 14.63 & 22.41 & 27.41 & 31.92 & 37.31 & 45.25 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 3.45 & 7.81 & 3.27 & 1.27 & 8.27 & 5.27 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{CAABO} & Mean & 13.54 & 21.92 & 25.5 & 29.67 & 36.88 & 42.53 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 5.05 & 5.60 & 1.54 & 8.07 & 2.49 & 6.33 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{BOLSR} & Mean & 12.81 & 20.21 & 23.04 & 28.42 & 34.67 & 38.21 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 4.25 & 1.54 & 6.69 & 3.64 & 7.64 & 3.64 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{\(\mathrm{ROR}\)} & \multirow{2}{*}{OLSR} & Mean & 21.79 & 38.46 & 58.18 & 67.29 & 69.92 & 72.32 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 9.57 & 3.02 & 6.34 & 2.13 & 11.88 & 5.67 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{EBOLSR} & Mean & 19.2 & 32.2 & 44.61 & 54.76 & 63.64 & 67.49 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 1.76 & 9.67 & 3.90 & 10.15 & 7.58 & 8.61 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{CAABO} & Mean & 18.45 & 30.73 & 41.41 & 51.32 & 59.92 & 64.02 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 4.90 & 8.83 & 3.39 & 11.63 & 5.42 & 12.76 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{BOLSR} & Mean & 18.12 & 29.85 & 39.44 & 48.6 & 55.6 & 59.4 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 2.32 & 5.79 & 2.83 & 6.82 & 4.01 & 7.63 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{\(\mathrm{E}\mathrm{C}\)} & \multirow{2}{*}{OLSR} & Mean & 72 & 83 & 94 & 123 & 157 & 168 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 9.82 & 6.84 & 5.34 & 9.41 & 4.64 & 4.06 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{EBOLSR} & Mean & 65 & 74 & 89 & 111 & 135 & 145 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 8.28 & 3.55 & 8.60 & 6.51 & 9.55 & 4.30 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{CAABO} & Mean & 62 & 71 & 85 & 104 & 129 & 137 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 6.60 & 5.10 & 8.06 & 2.93 & 8.66 & 4.53 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{BOLSR} & Mean & 61 & 69 & 82 & 98 & 119 & 129 \\ \cline{2-8}  & & SD & 5.95 & 4.33 & 7.02 & 4.52 & 7.18 & 6.67 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Scenario 2: The speed of nodes. Consequently, the effect of the number of nodes on EC for the BOLSR, CAABO, EBOLSR, and OLSR under the different number of runs is shown in Figure 9. The EC of the nodes are steadily increased when the number of nodes is increased, and the highest EC is recorded in the OLSR. On the other hand, the BOLSR consumes less energy than other protocols as the calculations of its optimal paths are constrained by the dynamics of nodes energy measures.