## 4 Structural Analyses Results
### Comparisons of Limit States
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**No**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Date**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Location**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Number of**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Suggested**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Measured**} \\ \cline{5-10}  & & & **D1 (m)** & **SD (m)** & **NC (m)** & **DL (m)** & **SD (m)** & **NC (m)** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{1} & \multirow{2}{*}{1969} & \multirow{2}{*}{Bosnia and Herzegovina} & 4 & 0.055 & 0.076 & 0.154 & 0.111 & 0.151 & 0.284 \\  & & & 6 & 0.112 & 0.146 & 0.257 & 0.196 & 0.253 & 0.443 \\  & & & 8 & 0.154 & 0.197 & 0.342 & 0.263 & 0.337 & 0.584 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{2} & \multirow{2}{*}{1962} & \multirow{2}{*}{Bosnia and Herzegovina} & 4 & 0.055 & 0.076 & 0.154 & 0.145 & 0.194 & 0.360 \\  & & & 6 & 0.112 & 0.146 & 0.257 & 0.245 & 0.316 & 0.552 \\  & & & 8 & 0.154 & 0.197 & 0.342 & 0.326 & 0.418 & 0.725 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{3} & \multirow{2}{*}{1981} & \multirow{2}{*}{Bosnia and Herzegovina} & 4 & 0.055 & 0.076 & 0.154 & 0.179 & 0.237 & 0.436 \\  & & & 6 & 0.112 & 0.146 & 0.257 & 0.293 & 0.378 & 0.661 \\  & & & 8 & 0.154 & 0.197 & 0.342 & 0.389 & 0.499 & 0.866 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{4} & \multirow{2}{*}{1969} & \multirow{2}{*}{Bosnia and Herzegovina} & 4 & 0.058 & 0.082 & 0.164 & 0.003 & 0.004 & 0.007 \\  & & & 6 & 0.119 & 0.155 & 0.272 & 0.006 & 0.008 & 0.014 \\  & & & 8 & 0.163 & 0.209 & 0.362 & 0.009 & 0.012 & 0.020 \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{5} & \multirow{2}{*}{2019} & \multirow{2}{*}{Bosnia and Herzegovina} & 4 & 0.096 & 0.132 & 0.251 & 0.013 & 0.016 & 0.029 \\  & & & 6 & 0.175 & 0.226 & 0.397 & 0.026 & 0.033 & 0.058 \\ \cline{1-1}  & & & 8 & 0.235 & 0.302 & 0.524 & 0.036 & 0.046 & 0.081 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 18: The obtained target displacements of sample RC models for Bosnia and Herzegovina. The target displacements suggested by the seismic design code for the first three earthquakes in Bosnia and Herzegovina do not provide target displacements in which the acceleration values measured in earthquakes are taken into account. However, the target displacements predicted for the structure for the last two earthquakes and the target displacements obtained under the effect of the earthquake were not exceeded. This suggests that the target displacements are adequately represented for some earthquakes, while it is not sufficient for others. The comparison of target displacements of sample RC models for Croatia is given in Table 19.  
The target displacements suggested by the seismic design code for all earthquakes in Croatia provide target displacements in which the acceleration values measured in earthquakes are taken into account. It shows that the seismic hazard is adequately taken into account in the structural analysis for all the selected earthquakes. The comparison of target displacements of sample RC models for Serbia is given in Table 20.  
The target displacements suggested by the seismic design code for all earthquakes in Serbia provide target displacements in which the acceleration values measured in earthquakes are taken into account. It shows that the seismic hazard is adequately taken into account in the structural analysis for all selected earthquakes. The comparison of target displacements of sample RC models for Turkishye is given in Table 21. As seen in Table 21, the target displacements suggested by the seismic design code for the first, second, and fifth earthquakes for Turkishye provide target displacements in which the acceleration values measured in earthquakes are taken into account. However, the target displacements predicted for the other earthquakes for these structures were exceeded. This suggests that the target displacements are adequately represented for some earthquakes, while it is not sufficient for others.