## 5 Experimental Results and Analysis
### Experimental Results and Discussion on Algorithms Comparison
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **Best** & **Worst** & **Median** & **Average** & **StdDev** \\ \hline NSGAII & \(2.62\times 10^{11}\) & \(1.43\times 10^{11}\) & \(2.43\times 10^{11}\) & \(2.34\times 10^{11}\) & \(3.71\times 10^{10}\) \\ MOPSO & \(3.23\times 10^{10}\) & \(1.81\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.24\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.41\times 10^{10}\) & \(4.27\times 10^{9}\) \\ MOAO & \(3.48\times 10^{10}\) & \(1.75\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.55\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.60\times 10^{10}\) & \(4.56\times 10^{9}\) \\ MOHBA & \(3.78\times 10^{10}\) & \(1.67\times 10^{10}\) & \(3.00\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.94\times 10^{10}\) & \(5.72\times 10^{9}\) \\ MOWOA & \(4.76\times 10^{10}\) & \(1.94\times 10^{10}\) & \(3.42\times 10^{10}\) & \(3.45\times 10^{10}\) & \(7.74\times 10^{9}\) \\ MOGWO & \(4.17\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.00\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.55\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.78\times 10^{10}\) & \(6.42\times 10^{9}\) \\ MOFECO & \(2.00\times 10^{10}\) & \(1.20\times 10^{10}\) & \(1.64\times 10^{10}\) & \(1.63\times 10^{10}\) & \(2.28\times 10^{9}\) \\ LSMOFECO & \(2.79\times 10^{11}\) & \(1.05\times 10^{11}\) & \(1.86\times 10^{11}\) & \(1.89\times 10^{11}\) & \(5.10\times 10^{10}\) \\ MOFECO-MS & \(3.25\times 10^{11}\) & \(2.79\times 10^{11}\) & \(2.93\times 10^{11}\) & \(2.98\times 10^{11}\) & \(1.25\times 10^{10}\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 32: Statistical results of HV indicator of the eight comparison algorithms for \(a280\_n279\). Figure 13: Plots of the non-dominated solutions in the objective space of \(ch150\_n1490\) obtained by nine algorithms in 15 independent runs (Pareto front obtained in each run are denoted by each color). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **Best** & **Worst** & **Median** & **Average** & **StdDev** \\ \hline NSGAII & \(3.58\times 10^{7}\) & \(1.40\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.28\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.37\times 10^{7}\) & \(5.88\times 10^{6}\) \\ MOPSO & \(3.88\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.00\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.95\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.90\times 10^{7}\) & \(5.98\times 10^{6}\) \\ MOAO & \(3.67\times 10^{7}\) & \(1.97\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.41\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.53\times 10^{7}\) & \(5.00\times 10^{6}\) \\ MOHBA & \(3.64\times 10^{7}\) & \(1.67\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.43\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.52\times 10^{7}\) & \(5.59\times 10^{6}\) \\ MOWOA & \(3.61\times 10^{7}\) & \(1.92\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.74\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.69\times 10^{7}\) & \(4.63\times 10^{6}\) \\ MOGWO & \(3.48\times 10^{7}\) & \(1.46\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.64\times 10^{7}\) & \(2.55\times 10^{7}\) & \(6.42\times 10^{6}\) \\ MOFECO & \(8.63\times 10^{7}\) & \(4.86\times 10^{7}\) & \(5.86\times 10^{7}\) & \(6.04\times 10^{7}\) & \(1.06\times 10^{7}\) \\ LSMOFECO & \(1.43\times 10^{7}\) & \(4.64\times 10^{6}\) & \(9.36\times 10^{6}\) & \(9.46\times 10^{6}\) & \(2.56\times 10^{6}\) \\ MOFECO-MS & \(1.67\times 10^{7}\) & \(6.56\times 10^{6}\) & \(9.08\times 10^{6}\) & \(9.65\times 10^{6}\) & \(2.53\times 10^{6}\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 31: Statistical results of PD indicator of the eight comparison algorithms for \(ch150\_n1490\).