## 3 Results
Similar differences were observed when comparing patients with L-CLP to the group with BCLP. Statistically significant differences were noted when compared to the R-CLP and BCLP groups, with the control group serving as a reference. Figure S2 demonstrates the differences in the width of the lateral right incisor. Statistically significant differences were observed between males with R-CLP and L-CLP, as well as between L-CLP and BCLP. However, when compared to the control group, statistically significant differences were not observed in the L-CLP group. Figure S3 presents statistically significant differences in the widths of tooth 11 among patients with L-CLP and R-CLP, as well as between L-CLP and BCLP. Again, when compared to the control group, males with L-CLP did not exhibit statistically significant differences. Similar results were observed in Figure S4, where the other central incisor was compared. In Figure S5, statistically significant differences were observed in the widths of tooth 22 between L-CLP and R-CLP patients, as well as between R-CLP and BCLP. Additionally, significant differences were found when comparing L-CLP and BCLP patients to the control group. Finally, Figure S6 presents statistically significant differences in the width of tooth 23. Correlations were observed among patients with L-CLP when compared to R-CLP, and significant differences were also found between BCLP and R-CLP when compared to healthy individuals. Table 8 provides an overview of the differences in tooth widths in the female group. Similar to the male group, the largest differences in width were observed in the lateral incisors. In unilateral cleft female patients, the most significant differences were found in the lateral incisor of the cleft side, with a difference of 1.5 mm compared to the unaffected side. In bilateral cleft patients, the widths of the teeth on both sides were comparable. It is noted that the mean values of teeth widths are larger for incisors, while the widths of canines are comparable. Table 9 presents the results of the variance analysis of teeth width in the female group, demonstrating that all the presented results were statistically significant. Following the variance analysis, Figures S7-S12 were prepared to visualize the statistically significant differences in teeth width within the female group. Figures S7 and S12 focus on differences among the canines, while Figures S8-S11 depict differences among the incisors. These figures are included in the Supplementary Materials. Figure S7 illustrates the statistically significant differences in the widths of tooth 13, which were observed only when the group of L-CLP females was compared to the healthy individuals. Figure S8 illustrates the correlation between the widths of tooth 12. Statistically significant values were observed between all groups of female patients with clefts when compared to healthy individuals. Among females without congenital deformities, the width of this tooth was statistically the highest. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline
**Tooth** & **SS—Effect** & **df—Effect** & **MS—Effect** & **SS—Error** & **df—Error** & **MS—Error** & **F** & **_p_ \\ \hline
**13** & 6.071 & 3 & 2.024 & 37.8 & 144 & 0.263 & 7.70223 & 0.000083 \\
**12** & 48.673 & 3 & 16.224 & 59.8 & 118 & 0.506 & 32.03587 & 0.00000 \\
**11** & 9.043 & 3 & 3.014 & 53.7 & 142 & 0.378 & 7.97142 & 0.000060 \\
**21** & 7.951 & 3 & 2.650 & 55.7 & 143 & 0.390 & 6.79829 & 0.000257 \\
**22** & 34.837 & 3 & 11.612 & 60.8 & 106 & 0.574 & 20.24232 & 0.00000 \\
**23** & 7.071 & 3 & 2.357 & 41.9 & 136 & 0.308 & 7.65669 & 0.000091 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Variance analysis in tooth dimensions in the group of males (SS—sum of squares, df—degrees of freedom, MS—mean sum of squares, F—test for variances differences, _p_—statistical significance). All the statistically significant values are presented in red.