# Odor Impact Assessment via Dispersion Model: Comparison of Different Input Meteorological Datasets
## 4 Conclusions
* (22) [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Assessing particle dry deposition in an urban environment by using dispersion models. _Atmos. Pollut. Res._**2020**, _11_, 1-10. [CrossRef]
* (23) [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Odour impact assessment by considering short-term ambient concentrations: A multi-model and two-site comparison. _Environ. Int._**2020**, _144_, 105990. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* (24) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Performing CALUPUF Analyses with Pseudo-Station Data Derived from MM5 Data. 2000. Available online: [https://d3 pcss2 wjq9 izz.cloudfrontnet/files/3783/articles/5161/tp_perform_calpuff.pdf](https://d3 pcss2 wjq9 izz.cloudfrontnet/files/3783/articles/5161/tp_perform_calpuff.pdf) (accessed on 13 May 2023). * (25) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] A sensitivity analysis applied to SPRAY and CALUPUF models when simulating dispersion from industrial fires. _Atmos. Pollut. Res._**2022**, _13_, 101249. [CrossRef]
* (26) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] C.; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Source contribution analysis of mercury deposition using an enhanced CALUPFF-Hg in the central Pearl River Delta, China. _Environ. Pollut._**2019**, _250_, 1032-1043. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* (27) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Performance evaluation of approaches to predict sub-hourly peak odour concentrations. _Atmos. Environ. X_**2020**, \(7\), 100076. [CrossRef]
* (28) [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] Intercomparison of FLEXPART and CALUPUF dispersion models. An application over a small tropical island. _Atmos_**2020**, _34_, 337-355. [CrossRef]
* (29) [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Variability in odour impact assessment due to different cloud cover estimation approaches: A northern Italy case study. _Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng._**2023**, \(8\), 100492. [CrossRef]
* (30) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; et al. Comparison of weather station and climate reanalysis data for modelling temperature-related mortality. _Sci. Rep._**2022**, _12_, 5178. [CrossRef]
* (31) [PERSON] Comparing meteorological data sets in the evaluation of climate change impact on hydrological indicators: A case study on a Mexican basin. _Water_**2019**, _11_, 2110. [CrossRef]
* (32) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Case study: A comparison of predicted Odour exposure levels in Barcelona using CALUPFF life, CALUPFF NoObs and CALUPUFF Hybrid model. _Chem. Eng. Trans._**2014**, _40_, 31-36. [CrossRef]
* (33) Lombardia, D.G.R. nLV/3018. Determinazioni Generali in Merito Alla Caratterizzazione delle Emission Gassose in Atmosfera Derivant da Attivria a Forte Impatio Odorgieno. 2012, pp. 18-49. Available online: [[https://www.region.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/1008c34a-79b9-4185-8557-6](https://www.region.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/1008c34a-79b9-4185-8557-6) fd665 eb7e86/DGR+3018_2012.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-1008c34a-79b9-4185-8557-6 fd65 eb7e86-n1K1R2t]([https://www.region.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/1008c34a-79b9-4185-8557-6](https://www.region.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/1008c34a-79b9-4185-8557-6) fd665 eb7e86/DGR+3018_2012.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-1008c34a-79b9-4185-8557-6 fd65 eb7e86-n1K1R2t) (accessed on 13 May 2023). * (34) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] _A User's Guide for the CALPUFF Dispersion Model_; Earth Tech, Inc.: Concord, MA, USA, January 2000; p. 521. Available online: [[http://www.src.com/calpuff/download/CALUPUF_UsersGuide.pdf](http://www.src.com/calpuff/download/CALUPUF_UsersGuide.pdf)]([http://www.src.com/calpuff/download/CALUPUF_UsersGuide.pdf](http://www.src.com/calpuff/download/CALUPUF_UsersGuide.pdf)) (accessed on 17 April 2023). * (35) US-EPA. Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications; Epa-454/R-99-005. 2000; p. 171.