## 4 Results
Figure 10: The importance of the element ‘organisation of transport and extraordinary transport’ in relation to the other elements of logistics coordination in the averaged assessment and after application of the weighting assessment. The management of network participants' resources from the operator level has great advantages over elements related to the organisation of transport and extraordinary transport, the management of human resources and infrastructure in the network, and the management of logistical information from the logistics operator level. The forecasting of flows in the network has great advantages over mechanisms related to the organisation of transport and emergency transport, the management of human resources and infrastructure in the network, and the management of logistical information from the level of the logistics operator. The organisation of transport and emergency transport has a slight advantage over resource management, however, it continues to be the element that is positioned lowest in the hierarchy. The demand management element has a strong advantage over the organisation of transport and extraordinary transport and a moderate advantage over logistical information management from the logistics operator level and the management of human resources and infrastructure in the network. The element 'human resources and infrastructure management in the network' has a slight advantage over transport and extraordinary transport organisation, information management from the logistics operator level, and human resources and infrastructure management in the network. The final assessment of the individual forms of logistics coordination and the individual mechanisms was based on the results of the AHP method carried out, where the weights were calculated based on the local weights for the individual elements of the forms of coordination and the weights of the individual forms (Table 14). The analysis reveals the following hierarchy in logistical coordination, highlighting the dominance of certain elements: forecasting network flows and managing stocks from the logistics operator level (both significantly more important than others); demand management and logistical information management from the operator level (both similarly rated); and, lastly, human resources and network infrastructure management (sharing economy) and organising transport and extraordinary transport. For market-based coordination mechanisms, the discrepancies between element weights are smaller, with the hierarchy as follows: price, formal relationships, and bilateral collateral. For hierarchical coordination mechanisms, the criteria are organisational integration, structures and control systems from management style, and bureaucratic resource allocation, with the first two elements similarly weighted. In social coordination mechanisms, trust is rated highest, followed by  
Figure 13: The importance of the element ‘management of human resources and infrastructure in the network’ in relation to the other elements of logistics coordination in the averaged assessment and after applying the weighting assessment. social standards and significant information exchange, with the latter two rated similarly. The final weights and the overall hierarchy of criteria for network coordination are shown in Figure 14.  
The most important elements in network coordination by the form of coordination are organisational integration (hierarchical form, weight of 0.1342), forecasting of network flows (logistic form, weight of 01312), structures and control systems resulting from management style (hierarchical form, weight of 0.1216), and management of network participants' resources from the logistics operator (logistic form, weight of 0.1148).