## 3 Results
### Statistical Analysis
#### 3.4.1 Analysis of Parameters in the I Measurement  
The results of I measurement for both the control and experimental groups are shown in Table 2.  
The minimum (min) and maximum (max) values of the monitored parameters in I measurement in the alveoli of the control group indicate that the values are within the expected range. Higher values of the coefficient of variation (c.var) indicate the heterogeneity of the control group in terms of wound volume (I), bone density (I) and periodontal pocket (I). Increased values of Skewness (sk) indicate that the distribution is _negatively asymmetric_. This means that the curve of the distribution of the results tends towards higher values, or that there are more higher values compared to the normal distribution, in the case of periodontal pocket (I). Reduced values of Skewness (sk) indicate that the distribution is _positively asymmetric_. This means that the distribution curve of the results tends towards \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Bone Density**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Volume**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Periodontal Pocket**} \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**(HU)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**(mm\({}^{3}\))**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**(mm)**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & **Left** & **Right** & **Left** & **Right** & **Left** & **Right** \\ \hline I Measurement & \(-297.76\) & \(-163.36\) & 408.49 & 397.92 & 6.34 & 6.23 \\ \hline II Measurement & 130.57 & 58.25 & 319.44 & 346.33 & 6.72 & 6.69 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Measurement results for bone density and volume of both left and right cavity for patient no. 1. Figure 9: Bone density measurements inside the cavity using a defined implant. lower values, or that there are more lower values compared to the normal distribution, for wound volume (I) and bone density (I). Higher values of Kurtosis (ku) indicate that the curve is elongated for bone density (I). Negative values of Kurtosis (ku) indicate that the curve is flattened for wound volume (I) and periodontal pocket (I). The distribution of values is mostly within the normal distribution (p) of all three parameters, namely, wound volume (I), bone density (I) and periodontal pocket (I). The minimum (min) and maximum (max) values of the monitored parameters in the alveoli of the experimental group in I measurement indicate that the values are within the expected range. Higher values of the coefficient of variation (c.var) indicate the heterogeneity of the experimental group in terms of all three monitored parameters: wound volume (I), bone density (I) and periodontal pocket (I). Increased values of Skewness (sk) indicate that the distribution is _negatively asymmetric._ This means that the curve of the distribution of the results tends towards higher values, or that there are more higher values compared to the normal distribution, in the case of bone density (I) and periodontal pocket (I). Reduced values of Skewness (sk) indicate that the distribution is _positively asymmetric._ This means that the curve of the distribution of the results tends towards lower values, or that there are more lower values compared to the normal distribution of the wound volume (I). Negative values of Kurtosis (ku) indicate that the curve is flattened for wound volume (I), bone density (I) and periodontal pocket (I). The distribution of values is generally within the normal distribution (p) for wound volume (I), bone density (I) and periodontal pocket (I). Table 3 shows the results of the significance of the difference between the groups, in regards to the monitored parameters in the I measurement. Based on the value of \(p=0.826\) (MANOVA), it can be concluded that no significant difference and a clearly defined boundary between the groups were observed. Further, as the value is \(p>0.1\) (VOL, density, periodontal pocket), it means that no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of wound volume (I), bone density (I) and periodontal pocket (I).