# Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructures by Subspace System Identification Method:
## 9 Conclusions  
This paper presented a review of the recent advances in subspace-based SHM methods. SSI is a powerful choice for modal identification, particularly when dealing with closely spaced frequencies or noisy response signals. The identified mode shapes using SSI-DATA were confirmed to be the most reliable when compared to MNExT-ERA and EFDD. Moreover, fewer errors were obtained in estimating the damping ratio using the SSI algorithm as compared to ARMA. However, there are some disadvantages in using SSI, such as requiring human judgment for system order and large work burden of the SSI algorithm. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Reference** & **Software** & **Analysis Tool** & **Environment** & **Purpose** \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [182] & ARTeMIS & CC-SSI & - & Modal identification \\ [PERSON] et al. [183] & ModalVIEW & SSI, RPF and LSCF & LabVIEW & Modal identification \\ [PERSON] et al. [184] & SMI & EFDD & LabVIEW & Modal identification \\ [PERSON] et al. [184] & CSMI & PP, FDD and SSI & LabVIEW & Modal identification \\ Goursat \& Mevel [186] & COSMAD & SSI-COV & Scilab & Modal identification \\  & & SSI, auto-regressive-based & & \\ [PERSON] et al. [185] & SMIT & methods and & MATLAB & SHM \\  & & realization-based algorithms & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 10: SSI-based commercially available software for SHM and modal analysis. In most structures, damage is imposed in the form of a reduction in the cross-section of structural members. A review on applied models used for verification of damage detection algorithms shows that damages in the 2D structures are usually detectable with a high level of precision. Three-dimensional frames and building structures are generally complex and pose challenges for both practitioners and researchers. Even though lots of proposed SHM algorithms work relatively well in simple structures, the robust application of these methods to solve the problem of local damage detection in real and complicated civil engineering structures has not been validated. The obtained results demonstrate that damage detection strategies that use vibration parameters of a dynamic system are only efficient for the detection of global damages and they are not generally sensitive enough to detect local damages in structures. Most commercially available software is generally designed for modal analysis and cannot be directly used for the SHM of structures. The commercial modal analysis toolboxes introduced are mainly implemented while using LabVIEW, which adapts a limited number of system identification methods, for example, SSI, LSCF, FDD, and SSI. The identification of modal parameters generally starts with extracting the response signal of structures and it results in the modal parameters of natural frequency, mode shapes, and damping ratio. However, SHM algorithms are generally complicated due to the wide variety of methods reported and their inherent structures. Hence, the implementation for the large diversity found in each category within a unified algorithm is quite a challenging problem. Resources, H.S. ([PERSON]), H.S. ([PERSON]), N.B., S.S.R.K. and M.P. ; investigation, H.S. ([PERSON]); writing--original draft preparation, H.S. ([PERSON]) and H.S. ([PERSON]); writing--review and editing, H.S. ([PERSON]), H.S. ([PERSON]), N.B. and S.S.R.K. ; visualization, H.S. ([PERSON]), H.S. ([PERSON]), N.B., S.S.R.K. and M.P. ; supervision, N.B. ; project administration, [PERSON] ([PERSON]), [PERSON] ([PERSON]), N.B., S.S.R.K. and M.P. ; funding acquisition, N.B., S.S.R.K. and M.P. ; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.