## 5 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Organisms** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Bi\({}_{2}\)S\({}_{3}\)**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**gC\({}_{3}\)N\({}_{4}\)**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & **5 mg/mL** & **10 mg/mL** & **15 mg/mL** & **5 mg/mL** & **10 mg/mL** & **15 mg/mL** \\ \hline _Bipolaris zeicola_ & 31.58 \(\pm\) 3.30 a & 28.49 \(\pm\) 2.53 b & 16.97 \(\pm\) 2.63 b & 13.23 \(\pm\) 2.80 c & 15.44 \(\pm\) 2.81 b & 18.53 \(\pm\) 4.12 b \\ _Phoma herbarum_ & 35.72 \(\pm\) 4.03 a & 21.09 \(\pm\) 2.95 c & 39.71 \(\pm\) 2.90 a & 45.00 \(\pm\) 3.97 a & 65.64 \(\pm\) 2.32 a & 41.03 \(\pm\) 3.21 a \\ _Epioccum nigrum_ & 4.59 \(\pm\) 1.21 c & 7.58 \(\pm\) 1.61 e & 7.54 \(\pm\) 1.71 c & 5.27 \(\pm\) 1.37 d & 5.09 \(\pm\) 1.50 c & 9.06 \(\pm\) 1.34 c \\ _Alternaria alternata_ & 28.86 \(\pm\) 5.35 a & 37.56 \(\pm\) 1.82 a & 35.35 \(\pm\) 1.87 a & 28.63 \(\pm\) 2.12 b & 20.42 \(\pm\) 3.17 b & 34.33 \(\pm\) 1.79 a \\ _Fusarium brachygibosum_ & 14.00 \(\pm\) 2.54 b & 14.13 \(\pm\) 2.78 d & 16.54 \(\pm\) 2.92 b & 7.92 \(\pm\) 2.90 d & 20.58 \(\pm\) 2.54 b & 19.37 \(\pm\) 2.43 b \\ LSD & 7.96 & 6.31 & 5.43 & 6.13 & 6.85 & 7.47 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Means with different letters across the column are significantly (\(p<0.05\)) different. Bi\({}_{2}\)S\({}_{3}\) = Bismuth sulphide nanoparticles, gC\({}_{3}\)N\({}_{4}\) = Graphitic carbon nitride nanoparticles.  
\end{table} 
Table 2: Percentage inhibition of different concentrations of nanoparticles on the growth of some pathogenic fungi. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Organisms** & **5 mg/mL** & **10 mg/mL** & **15 mg/mL** \\ \hline _Bipolaris zeicola_ & 22.40 \(\pm\) 2.53 c & 21.96 \(\pm\) 2.10 c & 17.75 \(\pm\) 2.42 c \\ _Phoma herbarum_ & 40.36 \(\pm\) 2.88 a & 43.37 \(\pm\) 3.74 a & 40.37 \(\pm\) 2.14 a \\ _Epioccum nigrum_ & 4.93 \(\pm\) 0.90 e & 6.33 \(\pm\) 1.10 d & 8.30 \(\pm\) 1.08 d \\ _Alternaria alternata_ & 28.74 \(\pm\) 2.85 b & 28.99 \(\pm\) 2.20 b & 34.84 \(\pm\) 1.28 b \\ _Fusarium brachygibosum_ & 10.96 \(\pm\) 1.96 d & 17.35 \(\pm\) 1.92 c & 17.96 \(\pm\) 1.89 c \\ LSD & 5.27 & 6.44 & 4.61 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Percentage inhibition of the pooled effect of nanoparticles on the fungi growth. The most significant nanoparticle inhibition of fungal growths was obtained at day 3 after culturing. No significant (\(p>0.05\)) difference was recorded in the fungal growths inhibited by Bi\({}_{2}\)S\({}_{3}\) nanoparticles at 5 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL concentrations on days 3, 5, 7 and 9, while the least inhibition at 15 mg/mL was recorded on day 9 of observation. Also, with the gC\({}_{3}\)N\({}_{4}\) nanoparticles, the percentage inhibition on day 5 significantly followed performances recorded on day 3 across all the concentration levels, while days 7 and 9 showed no significant differences in the fungal growth inhibition (Table 4). Figure 6: Pie chart showing the pooled effect of the nanoparticles on the percentage mycelial inhibition. Figure 7: Heatmap showing performances of the two nanoparticle types at different concentration levels. The pooled effect of nanoparticles on the fungal inhibition showed no significant (\(p<0.05\)) difference in the results obtained at all concentration levels on days 3, 5 and 7, while the results produced at a concentration of 10 mg/mL were more significant on day 9 (Figure 8).