## 4 Results and Discussion
Figure 8: Influence of unsteady parameter and hydrodynamic slip on \(g\). Figure 6: Influence of buoyancy and suction/injection parameter on \(g\). Figure 7: Influence of material and suction/injection parameter on \(g\). Figure 9: Influence of material and suction/injection parameter on \(\theta\). Figure 11 showed the rise in temperature profile \(\theta(\eta)\) under the action of thermophoresis parameter \(Nt\) with thermal slip \(S_{\theta}\). The particles which have high temperature are pushed away from the hotter region to a colder one. Due to this reason, the fluid's temperature gets changed. Therefore, temperature increases with the increment in thermophoresis parameter \(Nt\) but temperature profile decreases with the small increment in the unsteady parameter \(\delta\). With the growing values of buoyancy parameter and hydrodynamic slip, decreasing behavior of temperature is seen in Figure 12. In Figure 13, the impact of Lewis number \(Ln\) with concentration slip \(S_{\phi}\), in the presence of suction parameter on the volume fraction of nanoparticles \(\phi(\eta)\) profile can be seen. It is observe that \(\phi(\eta)\) decreases with the increment in \(Ln\) with \(f_{w}\). Basically, \(Ln\) is the ratio of momentum diffusivity to Brownian diffusivity. The reason behind the decrement in \(Ln\) is that molecules collide randomly with the increment in the Brownian diffusivity parameter. Figure 14 is sketched to discuss the rise of Brownian motion parameter \(Nb\) on \(\phi(\eta)\). The inclination in \(Nb\) results a decrease in volume fraction of nanoparticles \(\phi(\eta)\). Moreover, the concentration profile decreases with the increment in \(f_{w}\). The opposite behavior of \(\phi(\eta)\) is noticed for thermophoresis parameter \(Nt\) in Figure 3:0 Motile density \(\xi(\eta)\) is a decreasing function for bioconvection Lewis number \(Lb\), as seen in Figure 3:1 With the increment in \(Lb\), a decrement is generated in its diffusivity. Because mass diffusivity shows accession with the increment in \(Lb\) which causes a decrement in the density of motile organism. In addition motile density profile \(\xi(\eta)\) decreased with the increment in unsteady parameter \(\delta\). Figure 17 expressed the effect of microorganisms difference parameter \(\Omega\) on motile density \(\xi(\eta)\). It is very clear from the figure that by increasing the value of \(\Omega\) and \(B\), the decrement is observed for motile density \(\xi(\eta)\). In addition, motile density profile \(\xi(\eta)\) decreased with unsteady parameter \(\delta\). In Figure 18, the increasing values of Peclet number \(Pe\) mean smaller mass diffusivity of microorganism and hence the distribution of motile microorganisms is declined. Figure 3:2 Influence of unsteady and thermophoresis parameter on \(\theta\). Figure 3:3 Influence of unsteady and Brownian motion parameter on \(\theta\). Figure 3:4 Influence of suction/injection and Brownian motion parameter on \(\phi\). Figure 3:5 Influence of buoyancy parameter and hydrodynamic slip on \(\theta\). Figure 3:6 Influence of Lewis number and suction/injection parameter on \(\phi\). Figure 3:7 Influence of suction/injection and thermophoresis parameter on \(\phi\).