## 4 Discussion
This can be useful for research, education, and even for creating new exhibits, without the need to handle delicate and fragile original artifacts. Three-dimensional printing can also be used to repair damaged artifacts, as well as for creating casts for molding and reproduction purposes. While 3D scanning and printing have significant potential to improve the preservation and study of cultural heritage, there are limitations that need to be addressed. Firstly, the factor of cost. Both 3D scanning and printing can be expensive, and the cost of equipment and materials may limit the availability of these technologies for cultural heritage institutions with limited budgets. Secondly, the parameter of accuracy. The accuracy of 3D scanning and printing technologies can vary depending on the equipment and methods used. The accuracy of the scanned data can also be affected by the condition and complexity of the object being scanned. This can impact the quality of the final 3D-printed replica, particularly in cases where fine details are important. Thirdly, material limitations. While 3D printing has come a long way in terms of the range of materials that can be used, some materials used in cultural heritage preservation and restoration may not be compatible with current 3D printing technologies. For example, certain types of stone or metal may be difficult to 3D print. Moreover, intellectual property concerns arise by creating digital copies of artifacts and monuments. In some cases, institutions may not have the legal right to create a digital copy of an artifact or monument, or to use the digital copy for commercial purposes. In addition, there may be ethical considerations when creating replicas of cultural heritage objects, particularly if the replicas are intended to be displayed in public. Some people may argue that replicas can diminish the value and significance of the original artifact. Overall, these limitations may impact the effectiveness of combining 3D scanning and printing technologies in the field of cultural heritage. However, as the technology continues to develop, it is likely that many of these limitations will be addressed, making these technologies even more useful for preserving and studying cultural heritage. Another issue can be that large-format 3D scanning and 3D printing can certainly impact the resolution of replicated objects. When scanning or printing large objects, the resolution of the equipment can be a limiting factor in the level of detail that can be captured or reproduced. For 3D scanning, larger objects may require the use of lower resolution settings to capture the entire object. This can result in a loss of detail and fidelity in the scanned data, which can affect the accuracy of the final 3D-printed object. Additionally, the scanning process may take longer and require more resources to capture the largerobject, increasing the likelihood of errors or distortions in the data. Similarly, when 3D printing large objects, the resolution of the equipment can impact the quality of the final product. Larger objects may require the use of thicker layers, which can result in a lower resolution print with less detail. Additionally, printing larger objects may require more time and resources, which can increase the likelihood of errors or defects in the final product. To overcome these challenges, it is important to use high-quality equipment with high resolution settings when working with large objects. Additionally, it may be necessary to use specialized software or techniques to optimize the scanning or printing process for larger objects, such as adjusting the lighting or angle of the scanner or printer. By carefully considering the equipment and processes used, it is possible to minimize the impact of resolution limitations and achieve high-quality results when working with large-format 3D scanning and printing. In conclusion, the future potential of both 3D printing and 3D scanning in the field of cultural heritage is immense.