## 1 Introduction  
In recent times, the prioritization of evaluating vulnerabilities and potential hazards arising from seismic events has gained significance, largely due to the construction of numerous structures that do not adhere to relevant seismic regulations [1, 2]. The resulting damage from seismic occurrences has proven to be substantial [3]. It is imperative to examine existing structures in the context of potential seismic threats, given the risks these events pose to both human lives and the socio-economic framework. This impact influences the resilience and preparedness of buildings for such catastrophic incidents. An area of utmost concern in this evaluation is the seismic assessment of structures, with a particular focus on hospitals [4]. The primary objective of seismic design and evaluation is to ensure the safety and preservation of lives, minimize damage to infrastructure, and maintain the operational continuity of vital institutions such as hospitals. These establishments are intricate in nature, serving roles comparable to hotels, offices, and laboratories, as well as storage for both perishable and hazardous materials [5]. However, this complexity renders them particularly susceptible to the effects of seismic disturbances. Their vulnerability emanates primarily from two aspects: the structural integrity of the building and the ability of healthcare personnel to manage a sudden surge in patient numbers. Past seismic incidents, such as the 1994 Northridge earthquake, underscore the extensive devastation that earthquakes can inflict upon hospitals [6]. Subsequent studies following these events highlighted significant water damage, attributed to failures in chiller and hot water pipelines, even in the absence of structural harm [7]. Failures in non-structural components, including fire sprinkler systems, greatly hindered operational capabilities. Such occurrences underscore the critical need for comprehensive earthquake preparedness plans within hospitals. These plans should encompass efficient evacuation procedures, alternative healthcare facilities, and strategies to manage substantial increases in patient numbers [8]. The necessity of anticipating the seismic response of buildings considering potential earthquake impacts is evident. A multitude of analytical and experimental studies elaborate on this concept [9]. The utilization of nonlinear static analysis for evaluating structures brings forth notable benefits. In comparison to methods such as Rapid Visual Screening [10], this approach offers a comprehensive and deterministic assessment of a building's behavior during seismic events. Furthermore, relative to nonlinear dynamic methods [11], this approach is less complex and more straightforward, rendering it particularly suitable when time and resources are constrained. In Hungary, medical establishments warrant heightened attention among all essential structures. Interestingly, many Hungarian buildings were constructed during periods when seismic codes were not rigorously adhered to, revealing the potential seismic risks they might face. The novelty of the current study lies in its comprehensive methodology for seismic assessment, which specifically targets Hungarian medical facilities--a domain that has been previously overlooked. By amalgamating internationally recognized methodologies with considerations specific to the region, the objective is to furnish a tailored framework for comprehending and mitigating seismic vulnerabilities within Hungarian healthcare infrastructure. This nuanced approach, grounded in both global best practices and local intricacies, holds the promise of delivering actionable insights that are not only robust but also pertinent to the region. However, it is important to acknowledge that studies solely focused on Hungarian medical infrastructures are limited. Consequently, our research relies heavily on investigations that center around Italian and international medical facilities, as referenced in [1; 6; 7; 8; 12; 13].