## 3 Results
### Comparative Analysis  
The comparison of mechanical parameters for the ABS and ABS-like tensile-tested specimens produced through both FDM and SLA 3D printing methods is elucidated in Table 11 and visually represented in Figure 14. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{3}{*}{**Material**} & \multirow{3}{*}{**Case**} & **Average** & \multirow{3}{*}{**Average**} & \multirow{3}{*}{**Normal**} & \multirow{3}{*}{**Average**} & \multirow{3}{*}{**Average**} & \multirow{3}{*}{**Maximal**} \\  & & **Tensile** & & & & & & **Force** \\  & & ** Strength** & \(\varepsilon\) & **at Break** & **E** & **\(\Delta\)L** & **at Break** \\  & & **[MPa]** & **[\%]** & **\(\varepsilon_{\text{HB}}\)** & **[\%]** & **[MPa]** & **[mm]** & **[mm]** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{ABS (filament)} & Case 1 & 19.507 & 2.16 & 2.67 & 1320.754 & 3.07 & 806.355 \\  & (St. Dev.) & (0.384) & (0.04) & (0.28) & (114.695) & (0.33) & (22.729) \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-7}  & Case 2 & 27.401 & 2.24 & 3.62 & 1788.691 & 4.16 & 1093.946 \\  & (St. Dev.) & (0.756) & (0.08) & (0.72) & (75.380) & (0.83) & (15.922) \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{ABS-like (resin)} & Case 3 & 31.517 & 3.10 & 3.14 & 1608.525 & 6.51 & 1288.441 \\  & (St. Dev.) & (3.830) & (0.75) & (0.76) & (207.890) & (5.65) & (151.859) \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-7}  & Case 4 & 45.132 & 4.15 & 5.19 & 2085.842 & 5.91 & 1924.241 \\ \cline{1-1}  & (St. Dev.) & (1.839) & (0.52) & (1.15) & (66.237) & (1.32) & (77.360) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 11: Comparison of mechanical parameters in tensile-tested ABS (filament) and ABS-Like (resin) specimens manufactured via FDM and SLA 3D printing. Figure 13: Comparison of the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the SLA 3D-printed ABS-like tensile-tested specimens with those of the resin (manufacturer values): (**a**) average tensile strength, (**b**) average Young’s modulus. Figure 14: Graphical comparison of mechanical parameters between ABS filament and ABS-like resin: (**a**) average tensile strength, (**b**) average strain, (**c**) average nominal strain at break, (**d**) average Young’s modulus, (**e**) average max. displacement, (**f**) average max. force at break. The results obtained from Table 11 reveal a clear pattern--when 3D-printed using SLA technology, ABS material shows improvements in its specific mechanical parameters, especially in tensile strength, Young's modulus, and displacement. In the case of SLA 3D-printed ABS-like resin material specimens, which were printed with a 30% infill density, the average tensile strength increased by 38.11% when compared to FDM 3D-printed specimens with a 30% infill density (Figure 14a). For SLA 3D-printed ABS-like resin material specimens with a 100% infill density, the average tensile strength increased by 39.57% compared to FDM 3D-printed specimens with a 100% infill density (Figure 14a). In the context of SLA 3D-printed ABS-like resin material specimens, printed with a 30% infill density, the average maximum displacement exhibited a 14.96% increase when compared to FDM 3D-printed ABS specimens with a 30% infill density (Figure 14e). In the case of SLA 3D-printed ABS-like resin material specimens with a 100% infill density, the average maximum displacement showed a 30.32% increase compared to FDM 3D-printed ABS specimens with a 100% infill density (Figure 14e). In the case of SLA 3D-printed ABS-like resin material specimens featuring a 30% infill density, a noteworthy increment of 17.89% in the mean Young's modulus was observed in comparison to their FDM 3D-printed ABS counterparts with a 30% infill density, as illustrated in Figure 14d. Conversely, for SLA 3D-printed ABS-like resin material specimens featuring a 100% infill density, the average Young's modulus exhibited a noteworthy 13.48% increase when compared to FDM 3D-printed ABS specimens with a full 100% infill density, as also shown in Figure 14c.