## 4 Discussion  
The research results can be analyzed in many different ways. Nearly 95% of respondents in our survey group reported an improvement in establishing a relationship with the patient. This was primarily due to a reduction in patient's resistance (100%). The improvement in relation is crucial because, generally, in psychology, achieving a proper patient-psychologist relation is always the most challenging part of therapy [34; 35]. In the group of survey issues corresponding to substantive diagnosis, around 94% of responses indicated improvement, especially in establishing the diagnostic hypotheses (97%) which is the primary diagnostic challenge [3; 36; 37]. The most differentiated results we received in the survey group were referring to the diagnostic procedure. All (100%) of the responders indicated the improvement in  
Figure 4: Radar chart that presents the results received in the particular categories divided into three groups: relation with a patient, substantive aspects of a diagnosis, and diagnostic procedures (values are the percentage of yes marks). work comfort and 70% agreed that this method accelerates the diagnostic process. At the same time, 60% of psychologists declared that the method helped them increase their self-confidence in establishing the diagnosis. These results may indicate the need to better understand the tools and the developed method, primarily their technical and IT issues. An independent aspect seems to be the little experience of a psychologist in applying projective methods in the diagnostic process, which requires to be supervised by an expert. The chi-square test results show the lack of meaningful differences among groups of questions referring to relationship with a patient and the substantive aspects of a diagnosis. The experts agreed on the benefits that come from applying the computer systems in the diagnostic process. The primary benefit based on our study was the reduction in the patient's resistance towards the examination. Oftentimes, asking the patient difficult questions may affect the practitioner's relationship with the patient. Moreover, the methods enabled us to increase the patient's sense of security and intimacy during the first phase of diagnostics. Similarly, in the scope of the merits of the diagnosis, the experts strongly indicated the possible positive impact of using the support platform on the patient's self-reflection and self-diagnosis, deepening the possibilities of exploring problem areas and facilitating the assessment of the dominant affect related to a given topic, thereby facilitating the diagnosis of hypotheses and determining the effectiveness of possible interventions in the field of psychological intervention. A significant difference was noticed for issues related to diagnostic procedures. Psychologists who participated in the survey showed considerable indecision in indicating the usefulness of the method to for increasing confidence when establishing a diagnosis and the benefits associated with shortening the diagnostic process. It may be due to psychologists' disbelief in new technologies compared to classic diagnostic methods that do not use computer-aided systems. We should also note that a psychologist's fluency in the use of portable devices will have a final impact on the duration of the diagnostic procedure. Thus, IT training of psychologists in the use of diagnostic support systems will also be required. There are several limitations to the proposed method. The developed NLP method was used for computer-support of the diagnostic process of anorexia. In the future, we plan to develop detailed guidelines for the use of the developed method in other mental illnesses. There are problematic issues that can be encountered in text analysis such as the problem of irony (inverted meanings of words), the ambiguity of expression, and contextual interpretation.