## 3 Results
### Effect of Training on Performance  
There was a significant group \(\times\) time interaction for SJ, CMJA, SJT, 10 and 30 m sprint, and SJ90\({}^{\circ}\) (Table 4). There was a significant group \(\times\) time interaction for RCOD best, RCOD mean, and RCOD total (Table 5). Similarly, there was a group \(\times\) interaction effect for the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral direction r for right support leg during the Y balance test and on the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral direction for left support leg.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Experimental (n = 17)**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Paired \(t\)-Test**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Control (n = 17)**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Paired \(t\)-Test**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**ANOVA (Group \(\times\) Time)**} \\ \cline{2-13}  & **Pre** & **Post** & **\% \(\Delta\)** & \(p\)** & **d** & **Pre** & **Post** & **\% \(\Delta\)** & \(p\)** & **d** & \(p\)** & **ES** \\ \hline \multicolumn{13}{c}{_Vertical jump_} \\ SJ (cm) & \(27.2\pm 2.2\) & \(33.6\pm 2.1\) & \(23.6\pm 3.7\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(2.95\) & \(27.59\pm 2.38\) & \(28.79\pm 2.39\) & \(4.38\pm 0.92\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(0.50\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(1.17\) (large) \\ CMJA (cm) & \(33.4\pm 3.6\) & \(40.7\pm 3.8\) & \(22.2\pm 2.4\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(1.99\) & \(33.49\pm 2.33\) & \(34.96\pm 2.43\) & \(4.39\pm 0.96\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(0.62\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(0.98\) (large) \\ \hline \multicolumn{13}{c}{_Horizontal jump_} \\ STJ (cm) & \(10.9\pm 0.43\) & \(12.5\pm 0.49\) & \(14.3\pm 1.2\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(3.38\) & \(71.1\pm 0.50\) & \(11.6\pm 0.51\) & \(4.3\pm 1.2\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(1.02\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(1.16\) (large) \\ \hline \multicolumn{13}{c}{_Sprint_} \\
10 m (s) & \(1.9\pm 0.07\) & \(1.74\pm 0.06\) & \(-8.6\pm 0.78\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(2.51\) & \(1.9\pm 0.06\) & \(1.83\pm 0.07\) & \(-2.4\pm 0.62\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(0.70\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(0.94\) (large) \\ \multicolumn{13}{c}{30 m (s)} \\
30 m (s) & \(4.64\pm 0.17\) & \(4.31\pm 0.16\) & \(-7.0\pm 0.49\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(1.93\) & \(4.56\pm 0.24\) & \(4.45\pm 0.24\) & \(-2.6\pm 0.51\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(0.05\) & \(0.041\) & \(0.52\) (medium) \\ \hline \multicolumn{13}{c}{_Change of direction performance_} \\
5 90\({}^{\circ}\) (s) & \(7.67\pm 0.21\) & \(6.98\pm 0.16\) & \(-9.0\pm 0.84\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(3.75\) & \(7.60\pm 0.25\) & \(7.41\pm 0.21\) & \(-2.5\pm 0.64\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(0.82\) & \(<\)0.001 & \(1.24\) (large) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note: A 2-way analysis of variance (group \(\times\) time) assessed the statistical significance of training-related effects.  
\end{table}
Table 4: Vertical and horizontal jump test, sprint times, and change of direction performance performances in experimental and control groups before and after 8-week intervention.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline  & **ICC (95\%CI)** & **CV (95\% CI)** \\ \hline Left support leg & & & \\ Anterior direction (cm) & 0.98 (0.94–0.99) & 4.6 (4.2–5.0) \\ Posteromedial direction (cm) & 0.97 (0.94–0.99) & 4.3 (3.9–4.7) \\ Posterolateral direction (cm) & 0.95 (0.91–0.97) & 4.8 (4.5–5.3) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* There were no baseline differences between groups.  
\end{table}
Table 3: _Cont._  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline  & **ICC (95\%CI)** & **CV (95\% CI)** \\ \hline \multicolumn{13}{c}{_Left support leg_} \\ Anterior direction (cm) & 0.98 (0.94–0.99) & 4.6 (4.2–5.0) \\ Posteromedial direction (cm) & 0.97 (0.94–0.99) & 4.3 (3.9–4.7) \\ Posterolateral direction (cm) & 0.95 (0.91–0.97) & 4.8 (4.5–5.3) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
* There were no baseline differences between groups.  
\end{table}
Table 4: Vertical and horizontal jump test, sprint times, and change of direction performance performances in experimental and control groups before and after 8-week intervention.