## 5 Conclusions  
The presented study showed promising results regarding the acceptance and integrability of a newly developed telerehabilitation platform and service model for patients and therapists. Overall, the patients stated that telerehabilitation is a good addition to conventional therapy, although the quality of online therapy is lower than face-to-face therapy. The therapists reported that the system was easy to use but had some obstacles in exercise preparation. The integrability in daily life was good, according to the patients. For the therapists, integrability was average, as the test showed some obstacles in providing services beyond the clinical setting. In general, the proposed telerehabilitation service model and technology platform proved to be a promising concept to support rehabilitation. Advantages for patients are undeniable, for example, reduced traveling times to therapists, increased motivation, monitoring of exercise conduction, or the sole possibility of receiving treatment after clinical rehabilitation. For therapists, the newly developed approach enhances the possibilities of offering therapy, although the approach is not equally integrable in different settings.  
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: [[https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14188407/sl](https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14188407/sl)]([https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14188407/sl](https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14188407/sl)).  
Conceptualization, L.W., PS., I.C., N.B. and D.K.; methodology, L.W., PS., I.C., N.B. and D.K.; software, L.N.K. and A.D.; validation, L.W., PS. and D.K.; formal analysis, L.W., L.N.K., A.D. and D.K.; investigation, L.W., P.S., I.C., N.B. and D.K.; resources, L.W., L.N.K., A.D., P.S., I.C., N.B. and D.K.; data curation, L.N.K. and A.D.; writing--original draft preparation, L.W., L.N.K., A.D., P.S. and D.K.; writing--review and editing, L.W., L.N.K., A.D., P.S., I.C., N.B. and D.K.; visualization, L.W., L.N.K. and A.D.; supervision, D.K. and I.C.; project administration, D.K.; funding acquisition, D.K., I.C. and N.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.  
REHA2030 is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund in the framework of the Cooperation Program Interreg V-A Slovenia-Austria (SIAT258).  
The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia (Nr. 0120-562/2020/3, 20 January 2021) and the Ethics Committee of Carinthia. EK number M2021-29, [PERSON].  
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.  
The data presented in this study are available at the request of the corresponding author due to privacy restrictions.  
The authors thank all partners of the REHA2030 project, especially MKS Electronic Systems Ltd., who co-developed the platform. Furthermore, the authors thank all participating patients and therapists of the department for the rehabilitation of patients after stroke at the University Rehabilitation Institute Republic of Slovenia as well as the Private Clinic LAsnitzhohe and the freelance setting in Carinthia.  
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.