## 2 Results
### Fatty Acids
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Compound**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Concentration (g 100 g\({}^{-1}\) Olive Oil)**} \\ \cline{3-7}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**ANOVA\({}^{\ddagger}\)**} & **T0** & **T1** & **T2** & **T3** \\ \hline
1 & Tetradecanoic acid (Myristic acid) & NS & 0.025 & 0.024 & 0.022 & 0.025 \\
2 & Pentadecanoic acid & NS & 0.016 & 0.018 & 0.019 & 0.017 \\
3 & Hexadecanoic acid (Palmitic acid) & * & 19.93 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 19.06 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 18.96 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 19.05 b \\
4 & _cis_-6-Hexadecenoic acid (Sapienic acid) & NS & 0.207 & 0.206 & 0.196 & 0.202 \\
5 & _cis_-9-Hexadecenoic acid (Palmitic acid) & NS & 3.624 & 3.254 & 3.292 & 3.071 \\
6 & _cis_-11-Hexadecenoic acid & NS & 0.030 & 0.025 & 0.023 & 0.021 \\
7 & Hepadecanoic acid (Myristic acid) & NS & 0.135 & 0.150 & 0.161 & 0.154 \\
8 & _cis_-9-Hexadecenoic acid & * & 0.279 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 0.310 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 0.324 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 0.312 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) \\
9 & Octadecanoic acid (Shentz acid) & * & 1.880 b & 1.970 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 2.039 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 2.052 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) \\
10 & _trans_-9-Octadecenoic acid (Shentz acid) & NS & 0.013 & 0.020 & 0.015 & 0.016 \\
11 & _cis_-9-Octadecenoic acid (Shentz acid) & ** & 47.38 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 5.015 & 5.219 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 5.100 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) \\
12 & _cis_-11-Octadecenoic acid & NS & 7.026 & 6.514 & 6.537 & 6.419 \\
13 & 9,12-Octadecadecenoic acid (Ionesialacid) & NS & 0.082 & 0.031 & 0.027 & 0.029 \\
14 & 9,12-Octadecadecenoic acid (Iinchoice acid) & NS & 17.55 & 15.90 & 14.76 & 15.38 \\
15 & Excosonic acid (Arachidic acid) & NS & 0.512 & 0.499 & 0.497 & 0.506 \\
16 & 6,9,12-Octadecadecenoic acid (J-inchoice acid) & NS & 0.007 & 0.010 & 0.010 & 0.008 \\
17 & _cis_-11-Eleconsonic acid (Gondico acid) & NS & 0.333 & 0.341 & 0.339 & 0.341 \\
18 & 9,12,15-Octadecenoic acid (a-Imchoice acid) & NS & 0.902 & 0.866 & 0.799 & 0.794 \\
19 & Hemeconiconic acid & NS & 0.014 & 0.015 & 0.014 & 0.015 \\
20 & Decomoac acid (Behenic acid) & NS & 0.159 & 0.155 & 0.154 & 0.161 \\
21 & Tricosonic acid & NS & 0.043 & 0.004 & 0.040 & 0.035 \\
22 & Tetracosonic acid (Izioneori acid) & * & 0.101 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 0.091 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 0.009 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 0.091 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) \\ \(\Sigma\).SFAs & & NS & 22.29 & 22.00 & 21.98 & 22.09 \\ \(\Sigma\).MUFAs & ** & 59.78 b\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 61.66 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 62.81 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) & 62.71 a\({}^{\ddagger}\) \\ \(\Sigma\).PUFAs & NS & 17.61 & 15.96 & 14.82 & 15.43 \\ \(\Delta\).Atherogenic index, TI & NS & 0.326 & 0.311 & 0.303 & 0.308 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \({}^{\ddagger}\) NS = not significant at \(p<0.05\); **, significant at \(<0.05\) and 0.01, respectively; \({}^{\ddagger}\) Values (mean of 12 replications per irrigation treatment) followed by the same letter, within the same row, were not significantly different (\(p<0.05\)), according to [PERSON]’s least significant difference test. Note: SFAs: saturated fatty acids: MUFAs: monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFAs: polyunsaturated fatty acids.  
\end{table} 
Table 2: Fatty acid profiles of “Arbequina” olive oil as affected by the irrigation treatment. Figure 1: Quadratic correlation between total phenolic content (TPC (mg GAE eq L\({}^{-1}\))) and minimum midday stem water potential (Min \(\psi_{\text{stem}}\) (MPa)). Data shown in this figure are the mean of 12 replications per irrigation treatment. 100 g\({}^{-1}\) olive oil for T0 and T3, respectively), as well as lignoercic acid. Regarding the MUFAs content, the Optimal RDI (T1) oil showed a lower value than all deficit irrigation treatments. Oleic acid was affected by the irrigation treatments, having control (47.38 g 100 g\({}^{-1}\) olive oil) oils the smallest content in comparison with Optimus RDI (50.13 g 100 g\({}^{-1}\) olive oil), Confederation RDI (51.29 g 100 g\({}^{-1}\) olive oil), and Confederation SDI (51.00 g 100 g\({}^{-1}\) olive oil).