## 3 Results and Discussion
This result signifies a robust model that is highly likely to be effective for making practical decisions in determining the favorability of land use using the provided GIS model [88]. Figure 5: Map of actual favorability classes for orchards. The box plot graphs provide an overview of the distribution of favorability of land parcels across different favorability classes. From the data provided, we can deduce that the distribution has a slight tendency towards higher favorability classes for grassland use (mean \(>\) median), with the dispersion of plots being the highest for this land use type. In the case of favorability for orchards, the dispersion is the lowest, the mean being slightly higher than the median, indicating a slight presence of values above 1, but in general the data remain highly concentrated around class 1. The distribution is strongly asymmetric and does not show a large variation, suggesting that most of the land parcels are considered unfavorable for peach and apricot (due to the restrictiveness induced by the mean temperature values being too low in the study area than the species needs). This is supported by the low mean (1.32) and relatively low maximum (3) (Figure 7). In order to achieve the second objective of the study, that is to identify the future favorability classes, the temperature and precipitation values from climate models for the time frames 2020-2040, 2040-2060, 2060-2080, and 2080-2100 were used, and the future favorability classes were assigned based on current conditions (Table 3). The mean annual precipitation for the study area is currently 967 mm/year, but according to the climate scenarios, it can vary from 936.95 mm/year in the period 2020-2039, according to SSP1-2.6, to 821.94 mm/year in the period 2070-2099 mm/year, according to SSP5-8.5 [77] (Table 4). Figure 6: ROC curves for orchards (**left**), pastures (**middle**), and grassland (**right**). Figure 7: Blox pot diagrams for actual orchards, pastures, and grassland. V—very low, IV—low, III—medium, II—High, I—Very High Favourability (corresponding with the maps). The average temperature for the study area has a value for the present time of 5.51 \({}^{\circ}\)C; according to the climate scenarios, it can vary from 10.98 \({}^{\circ}\)C in the period 2070-2099, according to SSP1-1.9, to 15.40 \({}^{\circ}\)C in the period 2070-2099, according to SSP5-8.5 (41) (Table 5). A statistical analysis of the classification of parcels for grassland use reveals significant variations by favorability class, both at present and in the medium and long term. In the long term, comparing the current situation with the climate projections for the period 2070-2099, a decrease in the high favorability of the land is observed. Under the SSP5-8.5 \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Period** & **SSP1-1.9** & **SSP1-2.6** & **SSP2-4.5** & **SSP3-7.0** & **SSP5-8.5** \\ \hline
**PP/Y 2020–2039** & 915.96 & 936.95 & 918.78 & 913.83 & 896.5 \\ \hline
**PP/Y 2040–2059** & 899.96 & 907.79 & 896.93 & 896.91 & 872.03 \\ \hline
**PP/Y 2060–2079** & 900.91 & 919.22 & 907.7 & 864.65 & 829.7 \\ \hline
**PP/Y 2070–2099** & 901.06 & 912.06 & 895.02 & 844.22 & 821.94 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Change in annual precipitation between 2020 and 2099 according to climate scenarios.