## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline RPM & \multirow{2}{*}{**100**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**110**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**120**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**130**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**140**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**150**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**160**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**170**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**180**} \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{6-10} \multicolumn{1}{c}{[rev/min]} & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline FLOW & & & & & & & & & \\ \([\)L/min\(]\) & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
2200 & 1.41 & 15.45 & 14.18 & 13.02 & 11.93 & 10.88 & 9.85 & 8.86 & 7.91 \\
2300 & 1.61 & 14.92 & 13.68 & 12.54 & 11.45 & 10.40 & 9.37 & 8.38 & 7.41 \\
2400 & 1.40 & 14.38 & 13.17 & 12.05 & 10.97 & 9.92 & 8.39 & 7.39 & 6.92 \\
2500 & 15.20 & 13.85 & 12.66 & 12.58 & 12.38 & 8.47 & 8.40 & 7.39 & 6.41 \\
2600 & 14.61 & 13.32 & 12.42 & 13.29 & 12.80 & 6.33 & 10.26 & 7.51 & 5.90 \\
2700 & 14.03 & 12.79 & 13.14 & 13.53 & 5.95 & 12.08 & 10.98 & 8.39 & 5.59 \\
2800 & 13.47 & 12.26 & 13.26 & 13.56 & 5.02 & 12.27 & 11.26 & 8.90 & 4.88 \\
2900 & 12.91 & 11.73 & 13.16 & 13.46 & 4.23 & 12.32 & 11.31 & 9.40 & 6.45 \\
3000 & 12.36 & 11.21 & 12.93 & 4.99 & 12.95 & 12.36 & 11.21 & 9.62 & 7.40 \\
3100 & 11.81 & 10.70 & 12.57 & 4.03 & 12.73 & 12.25 & 11.06 & 9.68 & 7.76 \\
3200 & 11.28 & 10.18 & 6.22 & 3.95 & 12.43 & 12.03 & 10.91 & 9.63 & 7.91 \\
3300 & 10.76 & 9.68 & 5.95 & 3.22 & 12.07 & 11.72 & 10.69 & 9.50 & 7.91 \\
3400 & 11.26 & 9.18 & 5.81 & 11.67 & 11.65 & 11.34 & 10.40 & 9.29 & 7.81 \\
3500 & 9.74 & 8.68 & 5.86 & 11.08 & 11.23 & 10.90 & 10.05 & 9.01 & 7.63 & **Global desirability** \\
3600 & 9.24 & 8.20 & 6.29 & 10.40 & 10.84 & 10.40 & 9.65 & 8.68 & 7.97 & Excellent & \(\text{D}>\text{90}\) \\
3700 & 8.76 & 7.72 & 6.67 & 9.62 & 10.38 & 9.86 & 9.19 & 8.28 & 7.05 & High & 75 \(\text{D}\leq\text{90}\) \\
3800 & 8.29 & 7.25 & 6.20 & 8.89 & 9.87 & 9.28 & 8.68 & 7.84 & 6.67 & Medium & 50 \(\text{D}\leq\text{75}\) \\
3900 & 7.83 & 6.79 & 5.74 & 8.50 & 9.81 & 8.65 & 8.10 & 7.33 & 6.24 & **Low & \(\text{D}>\text{50}\)** \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 11: Decision Matrix tool for STICK RATIO and MSE surveillance and RPM/WOB/FLOW optimization. The legend shows severity levels of stick-slip, using the same scale as [PERSON] et al. (2017) [43], where a desired severity would be as low as below 20%. From the presented decision matrix, it can be seen that the excellent severity ratings and best achievable conditions are present in 57% of the total present area. The best results align to some extent with the recent literature and action plan workflow/flowchart presented and in use by companies #A/B/C, supporting the understanding that stick-slip and vibrations could be minimized by high RPM and low WOB while drilling [44]. It is also observed that as FLOW increases, a reduction in STICKRATIO becomes evident, likely due to improved wellbore cleaning caused by the increased flow, which can reduce the drill string torque [45]. Table 13 presents a framework showing optimized drilling mechanical parameters for STICKRATIO and MSE based on MSE. This means that the colored regions refer only to MSE and not to STICKRATIO. The legend indicates the degree of desirability for MSE. The model uses a minimum MSE value of 55.79 [kpsi], derived from the lowest actual data, and a maximum value of 500 [kpsi], proposed by the optimization model with the aim of reducing the amplitude to be tracked and optimized, since MSE focuses on minimizing the data, the goal is to seek a value as close as possible to 55.79 [kpsi]. Therefore, the MSE desirability percentage aligns with the values used in the model. For example, a desirability of 100 [%] corresponds to an MSE of 55.79 [kpsi], the minimum MSE value. A desirability of 0 [%] corresponds to 500 [kpsi]. Thus, a desirability of 90 [%] is approximately 100 [kpsi], 75 [%] around 167 [kpsi], and 50 [%] about 278 [kpsi]. In assessing regions with optimal drilling parameters for minimizing MSE, green highlighted options should be prioritized.