###### Abstract  
Land surface models (LSMs) play a crucial role in climate prediction and carbon cycle assessment. To ensure their reliability, it is crucial to evaluate their performance in simulating key processes, such as evapotranspiration (ET) and gross primary productivity (GPP), across various temporal scales and vegetation types. This study systematically evaluates the performance of the newly modernized Noah-MP LSM version 5.0 in simulating water and carbon fluxes, specifically ET and GPP, across temporal scales ranging from half-hourly (capturing diurnal cycles) to annual using observational data from 105 sites within the globally FLUXNET2015 dataset. The results reveal that Noah-MP effectively captured the overall variability of both ET and GPP, particularly at short temporal scales. The model successfully simulated the diurnal and seasonal cycles of both fluxes, though cumulative errors increased at the annual scale. Diurnally, the largest simulation biases typically occurred around noon; while, seasonally, biases were smallest in winter. Performance varied significantly across vegetation types. For ET, the simulations were most accurate for open shrulands and deciduous broadleaf forests, while showing the largest deviation for woody savannas. Conversely, GPP simulations were most accurate for wetlands and closed shrulands, showing the largest deviation for evergreen broadleaf forests. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis stratified by the climate background revealed that ET simulations failed to capture inter-annual variability in the temperate and continental zones, while GPP was severely overestimated in arid and temperate climates. This study identifies the strengths and weaknesses of Noah-MP in simulating water and carbon fluxes, providing valuable insights for future model improvements.  
evapotranspiration; gross primary productivity; model evaluation; Noah-MP LSM; water and carbon fluxes Vol. 1, 2020  
3 June 2025  
3 July 2025  
3 June 2025  
###### Abstract  
Land surface models (LSMs) play a crucial role in climate prediction and carbon cycle assessment. To ensure their reliability, it is crucial to evaluate their performance in simulating key processes, such as evapotranspiration (ET) and gross primary productivity (GPP), across various temporal scales and vegetation types. This study systematically evaluates the performance of the newly modernized Noah-MP LSM version 5.0 in simulating water and carbon fluxes, specifically ET and GPP, across temporal scales ranging from half-hourly (capturing diurnal cycles) to annual using observational data from 105 sites within the globally FLUXNET2015 dataset. The results reveal that Noah-MP effectively captured the overall variability of both ET and GPP, particularly at short temporal scales. The model successfully simulated the diurnal and seasonal cycles of both fluxes, though cumulative errors increased at the annual scale. Diurnally, the largest simulation biases typically occurred around noon; while, seasonally, biases were smallest in winter. Performance varied significantly across vegetation types. For ET, the simulations were most accurate for open shrulands and deciduous broadleaf forests, while showing the largest deviation for woody savannas. Conversely, GPP simulations were most accurate for wetlands and closed shrulands, showing the largest deviation for evergreen broadleaf forests. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis stratified by the climate background revealed that ET simulations failed to capture inter-annual variability in the temperate and continental zones, while GPP was severely overestimated in arid and temperate climates. This study identifies the strengths and weaknesses of Noah-MP in simulating water and carbon fluxes, providing valuable insights for future model improvements.  
e