# Power Control Techniques for Interference Management-
## 4 Power Control Technique Evaluation
### Keywords Analysis
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Keywords** & **Occurrences (\%)** & **Residual** & **Standardized Residual** \\ \hline resource management/radio & 274 (35.58\%) & 34.67 & 28.56 \\ resource management & 173 (22.47\%) & 19.45 & 16.02 \\ non-orthogonal multiple access/noma & 157 (20.39\%) & 17.04 & 14.03 \\ interference & 127 (16.49\%) & 12.51 & 10.31 \\ 5g/5g mobile & 115 (14.94\%) & 10.70 & 8.82 \\ optimization/nonconvex & 113 (14.68\%) & 10.40 & 8.57 \\ resource allocation & 106 (13.77\%) & 9.35 & 7.70 \\ device-to-device & 76 (9.87\%) & 4.82 & 3.97 \\ communication/device-to-device/d2d & 62 (8.05\%) & 2.71 & 2.24 \\ power allocation quality of service/qos & 59 (7.66\%) & 2.26 & 1.86 \\ interference manage-ment/interference & 50 (6.49\%) & 0.90 & 0.75 \\ mitigation & & & \\ reinforcement & 42 (5.45\%) & \(-\)0.30 & \(-\)0.25 \\ reinforcement learning & 40 (5.19\%) & \(-\)0.60 & \(-\)0.50 \\
6g mobile & 38 (4.94\%) & \(-\)0.90 & \(-\)0.75 \\ downlink & 37 (4.81\%) & \(-\)1.06 & \(-\)0.87 \\ uplink & 34 (4.42\%) & \(-\)1.51 & \(-\)1.24 \\ internet of things (iot) & 32 (4.16\%) & \(-\)1.81 & \(-\)1.49 \\ heterogeneous cellular & 30 (3.90\%) & \(-\)2.11 & \(-\)1.74 \\ networks & 30 (3.90\%) & \(-\)2.11 & \(-\)1.74 \\ throughput & 30 (3.90\%) & \(-\)2.11 & \(-\)1.74 \\ machine learning & 29 (3.77\%) & \(-\)2.26 & \(-\)1.86 \\ massive mimo & 29 (3.77\%) & \(-\)2.26 & \(-\)1.86 \\ cellular network & 28 (3.64\%) & \(-\)2.41 & \(-\)1.99 \\ signal to noise ratio & 27 (3.51\%) & \(-\)2.56 & \(-\)2.11 \\ spectral efficiency & 25 (3.25\%) & \(-\)2.86 & \(-\)2.36 \\ game theory & 24 (3.12\%) & \(-\)3.02 & \(-\)2.48 \\ wireless networks & 23 (2.99\%) & \(-\)3.17 & \(-\)2.61 \\ handover & 18(2.34\%) & \(-\)3.92 & \(-\)3.23 \\ training & 18 (2.34\%) & \(-\)3.92 & \(-\)3.23 \\ energy efficiency & 15 (1.95\%) & \(-\)4.37 & \(-\)3.60 \\ heuristic algorithms & 15 (1.95\%) & \(-\)4.37 & \(-\)3.60 \\ fading channels & 15 (1.95\%) & \(-\)4.37 & \(-\)3.60 \\ oldm & 13 (1.69\%) & \(-\)4.67 & \(-\)3.85 \\ small cells/femtocells & 12(1.56\%) & \(-\)4.82 & \(-\)3.97 \\ millimeter wave & 12 (1.56\%) & \(-\)4.82 & \(-\)3.97 \\ ultra reliable low latency & 11 (1.43\%) & \(-\Table 16 shows groups of keywords with records from the \({}^{1}\) Scopus, \({}^{2}\) WoS, and \({}^{3}\) IEEE databases. From each database, we obtained the number of occurrences for further analysis. Table 16. Authors' keyword occurrences from the sources. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Keywords** & **Occurrences** & **Keywords** & **Occurrences** & **Keywords** & **Occurrences** \\ \hline \({}^{1}\) NM & 8 & \({}^{3}\) RM & 53 & \({}^{2}\) SE & 0 \\ \({}^{2}\) NM & 56 & \({}^{1}\) RA & 17 & \({}^{3}\) SE & 22 \\ \({}^{3}\) NM & 24 & \({}^{2}\) RA & 23 & \({}^{1}\) EE & 12 \\ \({}^{1}\) PC & 80 & \({}^{3}\) RA & 53 & \({}^{2}\) EE & 31 \\ \({}^{2}\) PC & 96 & \({}^{1}\) RL & 15 & \({}^{3}\) EE & 48 \\ \({}^{3}\) PC & 48 & \({}^{2}\) RL & 23 & \({}^{1}\) GT & 3 \\ \({}^{1}\) QoS & 19 & \({}^{3}\) RL & 6 & \({}^{2}\) GT & 14 \\ \({}^{2}\) QoS & 46 & \({}^{1}\) DL & 13 & \({}^{3}\) GT & 7 \\ \({}^{3}\) QoS & 0 & \({}^{2}\) DL & 18 & \({}^{1}\) IOT & 0 \\ \({}^{1}\) 5G & 24 & \({}^{3}\) DL & 5 & \({}^{2}\) IOT & 22 \\ \({}^{2}\) 5G & 0 & \({}^{1}\) OPT & 9 & \({}^{3}\) IOT & 5 \\ \({}^{3}\) 5G & 58 & \({}^{2}\) OPT & 96 & \({}^{1}\) SC & 2 \\ \({}^{1}\) RM & 39 & \({}^{3}\) OPT & 14 & \({}^{2}\) SC & 0 \\ \({}^{2}\) RM & 231 & \({}^{1}\) SE & 3 & \({}^{3}\) SC & 10 \\ \multicolumn{5}{c}{**Keyword acronyms**} \\ \multicolumn{5}{c}{NM} \\ \multicolumn{5}{c}{power control: PC} \\ \multicolumn{5}{c}{quality of service: QoS} \\ \multicolumn{5}{c}{5G mobile communication: 5G} \\ \multicolumn{5}{c}{resource management: RM} \\ \hline \hline \({}^{\dagger}\) (Keyword): Scopus, \({}^{2}\) (Keyword): WoS, \({}^{3}\) (Keyword): IEEE. & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 16: Authors’ keyword occurrences from the sources. Figure 6: Most frequently used cumulative keywords from the databases.