## 3 Results  
When Table 1 was examined, a total of 301 actions were analyzed in the GR, FS, and WW styles. Of the 96 actions recorded in the GR style, 55.2% were 1-point, 37.5% were 2-point, and 7.3% were 4-point techniques. In FS, 53.3% of the 90 actions were 1-point actions and 46.7% were 2-point actions; there were no 4-point actions in this style. In WW, a total of 115 actions were recorded, of which 27% resulted in 1-point, 68.7% in 2-point, and 4.3% in 4-point techniques. The caution score was 6.3% in GR, 5.6% in FS, and 2.6% in WW. Stepping out was most common in FS (21.1%), followed by GR (12.5%) and WW (8.7%). Passivity/activity times were most common in GR style (27.1%), followed by FS (20%) and WW (11.3%). Regarding the use of the challenge system, the most rejected challenge was in the GR style (9.4%), whereas the highest acceptance rate was observed in WW (9%). Overall, 43.8% of all the actions were 1-point, 52.1% were 2-point, and 3.9% were 4-point techniques. When Table 2 was analyzed, a total of 53 non-technical points were recorded in GR wrestling. It constitutes 40.7% of the overall total. Of these points, 35.1% were performed standing and 18.4% in the par terre positions. The 47 non-technical points obtained in FS wrestling constituted 36.1% of the total. Of these points, 25.6% were obtained standing and 20.65% in the par terre positions. In WW, 30 non-technical points were determined, and this number corresponds to 23% of the total non-technical points. Of these scores, 39.1% were performed standing and 60.8% in the par terre positions. In total, 130 non-technical scores, 74 standing scores, and 92 par terre scores were identified. When the distribution of the scores according to the periods in Table 3 was analyzed, a total of 44 points were recorded in the first period of GR wrestling, and 61.4% of these points were obtained from 1-point, 27.3% from 2-point, and 11.4% from 4-point techniques. In the second period, a total of 52 points were scored; 50% of these points were scored by  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c  
1-point, 46.2% by 2-point, and 3.8% by 4-point techniques. In FS wrestling, 49 points were scored in the first period; 51% of these points were scored with 1-point techniques, 49% with 2-point techniques, and 49 points were scored in total. In the second period, 1-point techniques were used by 56.1%, 2-point techniques by 43.9%, and 4-point techniques were not recorded in any period. In the WW style, a total of 48 points were scored in the first period; 68.8% of these points were 2-point techniques, 27.1% were 1-point techniques, and 4.2% were 4-point techniques. In the second period, a total of 67 points were recorded, 68.7% of these points were obtained from 2-point, 26.9% from 1-point, and 4.5% from 4-point techniques. According to the analyzed technics in wrestling matches, body lock (34.6%) and arm drug (23.1%) were the most common techniques applied in the standing position in GR, followed by suplex (15.4%), back-flip throw (11.5%), underhook (7.7%), and headlock throw and arm throw (3.8%). For the par terre positions in GR, the most common technique was the gut wrench (41.2%), followed by passing behind, front headlock, counter-offensive block, and suplex (17.6%) in equal proportions. In FS, the most preferred standing technique was single-leg attack (57.9%), followed by passing behind (21.1%), body lock (10.5%), double-leg attack, and counter-offensive block (5.3%). For the par terre positions in FS, passing behind and leg lace were the most preferred techniques in equal proportions (33.3%), followed by gut wrench (16.7%), reverse body lift (8.3%), front headlock, and