## 3 Literature Review
In [10], the research compares the performance of three dynamic routing methods and investigates their redistribution mechanisms within a simulated network topology. The performance evaluation focuses on latency, throughput, and packet loss, with the network model comprising three PCs, nine Cisco routers, and four switches. The study in [11] assesses the performance of system failover connections within a network architecture that utilizes a combination of internal and external routing protocols and various Autonomous System (AS) numbers. Using the GNS3 simulator, the study measures key performance metrics such as throughput, jitter, packet loss, and latency, providing insights into the reliability and effectiveness of failover mechanisms in complex network scenarios. The research in [12] explores the Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) and Open Shortest Path First version 3 (OSPFv3) protocols, including their metric systems, with a focus on simulation outcomes. The study aims to draw conclusions about the efficiency of these protocols when implemented in an IPv6 corporate network. In [13], the research delves into RIPng and OSPFv3, comparing these protocols within an IPv6 framework. The study discusses simulation findings and seeks to determine which protocol is most effective under various network conditions. The study in [14] evaluates several transition techniques in networking using Cisco Packet Tracer, highlighting that the dual-stack approach performs better than tunneling. The research provides insights into the effectiveness of these processes in managing network transitions and emphasizes the benefits of adopting a dual-stack approach. The research in [15] compares the performance of an Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) with an Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP), aiming to identify the best protocol combination for complex environments. The study also simulates the Hot Standby Routing Protocol (HSRP) and the Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP) to evaluate load balancing and redundancy specific to BGP. The study in [16] investigates the transition and migration processes of IPv6, followed by a performance comparison of IPv4 and IPv6 for both data and voice traffic using Riverbed. The analysis shows that dual-stack is the most effective strategy for transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6, with tunneling as a viable alternative. In [17], the research builds a network to evaluate the performance of OSPF and OSPFv3 routing protocols in both IPv4 and IPv6 environments. The study compares response times for various applications, such as Database Query, Email, and FTP Download, under OSPF and OSPFv3, measuring traffic dropouts, hop counts, background traffic latency, and Ethernet delay. The study in [18] reviews multiple research papers on IPv6 deployment and the performance analysis of the OSPFv3 routing protocol. The review provides significant insights for researchers, laying the foundation for future investigation and advancement in the field. The research in [19] analyzes how different Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) tunnel parameters affect the efficiency of real-time application streaming in IP networks. The study examines tunnel depth and the routing methods used within GRE tunnels, offering insights into the limitations and optimal routing schemes for real-time traffic. The purpose of the research in [20] is to assess the effectiveness of routing protocols within an IPv6 network, particularly RIPng, OSPFv3, and EIGRP. Performance measures such as throughput, jitter, and packet loss are evaluated using GNSS3, with the goal of determining the suitability of each routing protocol in an IPv6 context. This research distinguishes itself by utilizing advanced simulation and virtualization tools like GNS3, VMware, Wireshark, and Iperf3 to evaluate critical metrics such as convergence latency, jitter, and packet loss.