## 5 Results
### Castelo Branco  
Through the analysis of Tables 8 and 9, it is concluded that the optimal scenario is the scenario with overtime where the distribution is made by two vehicles. These vehicles' routes are shown in Figures 13 and 14. The times spent on each route are 545 min and 407 min, respectively. There were savings of EUR 1889.55 and 35,600.00 g of CO\({}_{2}\) emissions.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c l} \hline \hline
**Time** & **Vehicle** & **Results** & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{\(1\)} & \multirow{4}{*}{\(1\)} & \multirow{4}{*}{Route:} & Origin (min:0) \(\Rightarrow\) 11 (min: 149) \(\Rightarrow\) 29 (min: 189) \\  & & & \(\Rightarrow\) 35 (min: 229) \(\Rightarrow\) 87 (min: 294) \(\Rightarrow\) 55 (min: 359) \\  & & & \(\Rightarrow\) Origin (min: 462) \\ \cline{2-4}  & & Load (bottles): & 4890 \\ \cline{2-4}  & & & Origin (min:0) \(\Rightarrow\) 16 (min: 126) \(\Rightarrow\) 15 (min: 150) \\ \cline{2-4}  & & & \(\Rightarrow\) 39 (min: 200) \(\Rightarrow\) 64 (min: 249) \(\Rightarrow\) 17 (min: 306) \\ \cline{2-4}  & & & \(\Rightarrow\) 68 (min: 365) \(\Rightarrow\) 74 (min: 404) \(\Rightarrow\) Origin \\ \cline{2-4}  & & & (min: 464) \\ \cline{2-4}  & & Load (bottles): & 5161 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{\(3\)} & \multirow{3}{*}{Route:} & Origin (min:0) \(\Rightarrow\) 83 (min: 102) \(\Rightarrow\) Origin \\  & & & (min: 204) \\ \cline{2-4}  & & Load (bottles): & 18 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 8: Results for the _Castelo Branco_ cluster.  
Figure 12: The _Aveiro_ cluster optimal route.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Time** & **Vehicle** & **Results** & \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{**585**} & \multirow{6}{*}{**1**} & & Origin (min: 0) => 11 (min: 149) => 29 (min: 189) \\  & & & => 35 (min:229) => 64 (min: 286) => 39 (min: 335) \\  & & Route: & => 17 (min: 379) => 87 (min: 428) => 74 (min: 485) => Origin \\  & & & => Origin (min: 545) \\ \cline{2-4}  & & Load (bottles): & 6887 \\ \cline{2-4}  & & Route: & Origin (min: 0) => 83 (min: 102) => 68 (min: 152) => 16 (min: 205) => 15 (min: 229) => 55 (min: 304) \\ \cline{2-4}  & & & => Origin (min: 407) \\ \cline{2-4}  & & Load (bottles): & 3182 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 8: _Cont._  
Figure 13: Route of vehicle 1 for the _Castelo Branco_ cluster.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Maximum Time (min)** & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**480**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**585**} \\ \hline Vehicle & 1 & 2 & 3 & 1 & 2 \\ \hline Hourly Labor Cost (\(\mathbf{\xi}\)) & 2400.00 & 2400.00 & 2400.00 & 2400.00 & 2400.00 \\ \hline Overtime Cost (\(\mathbf{\xi}\)) & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 650.00 & 0.00 \\ \hline Fixed Cost per Vehicle (\(\mathbf{\xi}\)) & 100.00 & 100.00 & 100.00 & 100 & 100 \\ \hline Fuel Cost (\(\mathbf{\xi}\)) & 102.67 & 103.11 & 45.33 & 121.11 & 90.44 \\ \hline Route Total Cost (\(\mathbf{\xi}\)) & 2602.67 & 2603.11 & 2545.33 & 3271.11 & 2590.44 \\ \hline Total Cost (\(\mathbf{\xi}\)) & & 7751.11 & & 5861.56 \\ \hline CO\({}_{2}\) Emission (g) & & 226,000.00 & & 190,400.00 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 9: _Castelo Branco_ cluster cost analysis.  
The dots presented in the _Castelo Branco_ tables are 11-_Belmonte_; 15-_Castelo Branco_ (_S. Miguel_); 16-_Castelo Branco_ (_S. Tiago_); 17-_Castelo Branco_ (_Alcains_); 29-_Covilla_; 35-_Fundaio_; 39-_Idaha-a-Nova_; 55-_Oleiros_; 64-_Penamacor_; 68-_Proenca-a-Nova_; 74-_Serta_; 83-_Vila de Rei_; 87-_Vila de Rotao_.