###### Abstract
In various studies, authors have concentrated on the security of digital signature secret keys, including the utilization of human-memorable passwords for encryption. However, due to the low entropy in such schemes, they have proven to be insecure against loss or theft. In 1995, [PERSON] presented a method in which the client's signing exponent is derived from the password [16]. Similar approaches have also been suggested by the same author and are given in [17; 18]. In these proposed schemes, multiple parties are involved in sharing a secret key, and one party's involvement depends on the password. [PERSON] et al. recommended a similar algorithm in 2005 that used a password-based approach to authenticate with the server and sign messages on behalf of the user [19]. However, since the server has access to the signing key, it may execute offline attacks against the user's password and sign messages under the user's name, rendering this approach less secure. Transport Layer Security (TLS) is widely used for secure communication over the internet. TLS is a hybrid protocol that employs both symmetric and asymmetric key cryptosystems for secure communication and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) for key distribution and certificates. Another protocol that is tremendously used is Internet Protocol Security (IPsec). The application of IPsec is mostly for secure communication between IP-based networks. It uses a combination of symmetric and asymmetric key cryptosystems and various key management protocols, such as Internet Key Exchange (IKE) and Oakley protocol [20]. These protocols have applications for internet security and are used worldwide; however, they do have limitations. For instance, they may not be applicable to certain types of communication, such as peer-to-peer communication and secure communication between devices with limited resources. In recent years, quantum cryptography has seen tremendous progress in mitigating the threat of fast computation by quantum computers for classical algorithms [21]. Consequently, a new key management and distribution system has been designed based on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) in this area [22]. QKD uses the principle of quantum computing and is considered a secure algorithm even in the presence of quantum computers, but it has certain limitations due to its complexity and implementation [23]. As discussed, certain existing models have limitations, such as interception during distribution, that may lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information. Furthermore, many of them rely on pre-shared keys or certificates, and their compromise poses a threat to the protocol. Additionally, a limitation of such a protocol is the loss or corruption of the key, which may render the data inaccessible to authorized parties. Furthermore, protecting IMA notifications against physical attacks is an increasingly critical area of research, given the widespread use of mobile devices and the sensitive nature of the data they often carry. It has seen innovative advancements that focus on context-aware notification management, secure channels, screen obfuscation, proximity-based control, AI-driven behavior analysis, multi-factor authentication (MFA), adaptive filtering, and comprehensive privacy frameworks. Context-awareness leverages environmental and user activity data to intelligently manage notifications, as discussed by [PERSON], [PERSON] et al. [24]. Secure transmission channels using end-to-end encryption, explored by [PERSON] et al. [25], mitigate interception risks. Screen obfuscation techniques, highlighted by [PERSON] et al. [26], prevent shoulder surfing by dynamically obscuring sensitive content. Proximity sensors control notification display based on user and observer presence, as [27] proposed. AI and machine learning analyze user behavior to predict threats and adjust settings, as demonstrated by [PERSON] et al. [28]. MFA ensures only authorized access to sensitive notifications, enhancing security, as shown in [29].