## 3 Results  
Table 1 shows a comparison of the anthropometric characteristics by training group. Statistically significant differences were not found between MT and ET groups for all the characteristics, except for BMI (\(p=0.004\)) and supra-iliac skinfold (\(p=0.026\)). Regarding macronutrient intake, as shown in Table 2, neither group had an energy intake (EI) that matched their total energy expenditure (TEE), with the MT group having the highest total energy expenditure and ET group the highest energy intake. Statistically significant differences were found between the MT and ET groups for total energy expenditure (TEE). No statistically significant differences were found between MT and ET groups with respect to the macronutrient intake, nor for lipid profile. With respect to the caloric profile, % Lipid was higher in the ET group (\(p=0.042\)). Micronutrient intake means were compared between groups and against recommended dietary intakes (RDIs) for the general Spanish male population accordingly (Tables 3 and 4). Regarding vitamin intake, only B12 showed statistically significant differences between the MT and ET groups (\(p=0.001\)), with higher values in the MT group. Both groups exceeded the RDI for all vitamins, except for vitamin E, for which both groups met at least two-thirds of the RDI. As for minerals, calcium (\(p=0.049\)) and chloride (\(p=0.032\)) showed statistically significant differences between the MT and ET groups, with higher intake in ET. Both groups exceeded the RDI for all minerals, except for calcium and iodine, for which both groups met at least two-thirds of the RDI. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Variable** & **Sample** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Group**} & \\
**(Mean, SD)** & **(\(n=40\))** & **Moming Training MT** & **Evening Training** & \(p\) & **Min** & **Max** \\ \hline Weight (kg) & 71.19 (5.78) & 70.74 (5.19) & 71.53 (6.28) & 0.568 & 51.20 & 79.70 \\ Height (cm) & 178.01 (5.83) & 176.29 (5.68) & 179.28 (5.73) & 0.874 & 167.00 & 188.70 \\ BMI (kg/m\({}^{2}\)) & 22.45 (1.25) & 22.74 (0.79) & 22.23 (1.48) & 0.004 & 19.65 & 24.87 \\ Faulkner body fat (\%) & 11.63 (1.29) & 11.78 (1.34) & 11.47 (1.25) & 0.894 & 9.49 & 14.13 \\ Tricipital skinfold (mm) & 7.92 (1.64) & 8.06 (1.81) & 7.81 (1.53) & 0.322 & 6.00 & 11.20 \\ Subscapular skinfold (mm) & 8.62 (1.43) & 9.02 (1.17) & 8.31 (1.55) & 0.921 & 6.00 & 13.80 \\ Abdominal skinfold (mm) & 10.59 (3.71) & 10.44 (3.53) & 10.70 (3.91) & 0.867 & 5.40 & 23.00 \\ Thigh skinfold (mm) & 10.62 (2.49) & 10.59 (2.33) & 10.64 (2.65) & 0.517 & 6.40 & 17.00 \\ Calf skirfold (mm) & 6.45 (1.35) & 6.41 (1.26) & 6.47 (1.44) & 0.552 & 4.00 & 9.80 \\ Supra-iliac skinfold (mm) & 10.79 (3.71) & 11.52 (4.36) & 10.05 (2.87) & 0.026 & 4.90 & 15.20 \\ Arm relaxed (cm) & 29.87 (1.93) & 30.95 (1.54) & 28.79 (1.69) & 0.685 & 25.00 & 31.60 \\ Waist (cm) & 75.79 (3.25) & 75.83 (3.18) & 75.74 (3.41) & 0.975 & 66.70 & 80.30 \\ Hip (cm) & 93.61 (3.46) & 93.74 (3.30) & 93.49 (3.71) & 0.543 & 86.20 & 98.70 \\ WHR & 0.81 (0.03) & 0.81 (0.03) & 0.81 (0.03) & 0.670 & 0.77 & 0.88 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Anthropometric characteristics of the study sample by training group.