## 3 Results
### Descriptive Analysis
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multirow{2}{*}{**Data**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Total**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Match**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Mismatch**} \\ \cline{3-8}  & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**N = 60,600**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**N = 48,431**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**N = 12,169**} \\ \cline{3-8}  & & **Avg** & **Std. Dev** & **Avg** & **Std. Dev** & **Avg** & **Std. Dev** \\ \hline Elderly pedestrian & Frequency & 0.51 & 1.59 & 0.35 & 1.44 & 1.17 & 1.96 \\ traffic accidents & Death & 0.02 & 0.22 & 0.01 & 0.21 & 0.02 & 0.25 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Aggressive driving behaviors} & \# of rapid acceleration & 134.05 & 420.11 & 85.89 & 360.25 & 325.71 & 562.53 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \# of rapid deceleration & 37.90 & 250.97 & 21.95 & 112.51 & 101.40 & 508.17 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \# of rapid lane change & 17.40 & 91.84 & 9.15 & 56.98 & 50.24 & 166.54 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \# of rapid turn & 3.74 & 49.40 & 2.11 & 20.10 & 10.22 & 102.44 \\ \cline{2-8}  & \# of speeding & 65.94 & 414.01 & 24.14 & 223.89 & 232.29 & 787.04 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Built-up} & \multirow{8}{*}{Built-up} & Residential area & 0.28 & 0.36 & 0.27 & 0.36 & 0.33 & 0.34 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & Commercial area & 0.09 & 0.19 & 0.07 & 0.17 & 0.17 & 0.24 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-8}  & \multirow{2}{*}{Built-up} & Cultural and & \multirow{2}{*}{0.01} & Cultural and & \multirow{2}{*}{0.06} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.01} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.07} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.01} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.05} \\ \cline{3-8}  & & Leisure area & & & & & & \\ \cline{3-8}  & & Transportation area & 0.12 & 0.18 & 0.09 & 0.16 & 0.25 & 0.20 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & Public facility area & 0.03 & 0.11 & 0.04 & 0.12 & 0.03 & 0.09 \\ \cline{3-8} Land uses/ & & Rice paddy area & 0.00 & 0.06 & 0.01 & 0.07 & 0.00 & 0.01 \\ \cline{3-8} land covers & & Field area & 0.01 & 0.06 & 0.01 & 0.07 & 0.00 & 0.04 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & Facility cultivation area & 0.00 & 0.03 & 0.00 & 0.03 & 0.00 & 0.02 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & Orchard area & 0.00 & 0.02 & 0.00 & 0.02 & 0.00 & 0.01 \\ \cline{3-8}  & & Other cultivation area & 0.00 & 0.03 & 0.00 & 0.03 & 0.00 & 0.02 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Forest} & Broadleaf forest area & 0.17 & 0.31 & 0.20 & 0.34 & 0.03 & 0.12 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-8}  & & Coniferous forest area & 0.04 & 0.15 & 0.05 & 0.16 & 0.00 & 0.04 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-8}  & & Mixed forest area & 0.03 & 0.13 & 0.04 & 0.14 & 0.00 & 0.05 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Descriptive Statistics. In terms of land use, the'mismatch' group is associated with higher proportions of transportation areas and commercial areas than the'match' group. Forest areas, especially broadleaf and mixed forests, show minimal representation in the'mismatch' group compared to the'match' group. Regarding urban facilities, the'mismatch' group has more bus stops and hospitals. Similarly, road infrastructures such as crosswalks and speedbumps are more prevalent in the'mismatch' group, suggesting a potentially greater urban density. Finally, the sociodemographic features reveal higher elderly and working population counts in the'mismatch' group. These differences collectively highlight the distinct spatial, behavioral, and demographic dynamics underlying the two groups, with the'mismatch' group generally representing a more complex and risk-prone environment.