## 4 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Flight Phase** & **Time (s)** & \(we_{1}\) & \(we_{2}\) & \(we_{3}\) & \(we_{4}\) & \(we_{5}\) \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\(F_{1}\)} & \(t_{1}\) & 1 & 0.46220742 & 0.94645741 & 0.218595649 & 0.847502551 \\  & \(t_{2}\) & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0.233116762 & 1 \\  & \(t_{3}\) & 1 & 1 & 0.951760794 & 0.235257712 & 1 \\  & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) \\  & \(t_{276}\) & 0.97992063 & 0 & 0.471340699 & 0.14283007 & 0.438345215 \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\(F_{2}\)} & \(t_{1}\) & 0.988239714 & 0.454049545 & 0.424121729 & 0.132333804 & 0.153774841 \\  & \(t_{2}\) & 0.990702471 & 1 & 0.419216608 & 0.137494989 & 0.834313071 \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(t_{3}\) & 0.98967931 & 1 & 0.792419283 & 0.137344251 & 0.008628331 \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(t_{65}\) & 0.988395287 & 0 & 0.426082067 & 0.138670658 & 0.479255149 \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\(F_{3}\)} & \(t_{1}\) & 0.922634638 & 0.437911954 & 0.936610905 & 0.977995247 & 0.426779549 \\  & \(t_{2}\) & 0.905043969 & 1 & 0.952756213 & 0.999999476 & 0.420970209 \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(t_{3}\) & 0.902043707 & 1 & 0.975697613 & 0.999877704 & 0.414179147 \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(t_{133}\) & 0.173149987 & 0.99990308 & 0.938534766 & 0.326427285 & 0 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Fragments of normalized data for Aircraft 1. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Flight Phase** & **Time (s)** & \(\tilde{ve_{1}}\) & \(\tilde{ve_{2}}\) & \(\tilde{ve_{3}}\) & \(\tilde{ve_{4}}\) & \(\tilde{ve_{5}}\) \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\(F_{1}\)} & \(t_{1}\) & 78.63635063 & 0.022903018 & 0.056955248 & 0.712948588 & 1.793574051 \\  & \(t_{2}\) & 81.42051644 & 0.186829189 & 0.050822014 & 0.845992107 & 2.208274179 \\  & \(t_{3}\) & 82.69220317 & 0.085320094 & 0.042786165 & 0.854582661 & 3.714807519 \\  & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) \\  & \(t_{156}\) & 82.32072282 & 0.008289698 & 0.030878414 & 0.938804862 & 5.956732712 \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\(F_{2}\)} & \(t_{1}\) & 82.47989533 & 0.032322587 & 0.061314139 & 1.480290442 & 8.738437206 \\  & \(t_{2}\) & 83.04042007 & 0.260362592 & 0.049529318 & 1.479878059 & 11.48175801 \\  & \(t_{3}\) & 82.63324207 & 0.134218471 & 0.041158517 & 1.443662837 & 12.22930992 \\  & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) \\  & \(t_{87}\) & 87.10167941 & 0.007508137 & 0.079098096 & 1.535161675 & 7.224031117 \\ \hline \multirow{6}{*}{\(F_{3}\)} & \(t_{1}\) & 81.86388302 & 0.022800536 & 0.056578712 & 3.289335549 & 2.772607902 \\  & \(t_{2}\) & 82.14833814 & 0.192813556 & 0.067096484 & 3.364855476 & 3.914016711 \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(t_{3}\) & 82.05876755 & 0.141202773 & 0.058621501 & 3.2898990021 & 5.168266561 \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) & \(\dots\) \\ \cline{1-1}  & \(t_{101}\) & 80.1330846 & 0.009135491 & 0.06362073 & 1.798787379 & 2.996207565 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Fragments of the input data of the average value of the noise level for Aircraft 2. Thus, for the flight instructor, the normalized assessments of psychophysiological workload factors for noise measurement were obtained by predicting the input data. To obtain a single aggregated predicted score, the value was calculated using the conic-shaped membership function, Formula (7), as follows: