## 2 Research on Evaluation and Analysis of Criteria for GenAI Tools Based on Multi-Criteria Methods
### Criteria for Selecting GenAI Tools
Cost and Value:The cost of AI tools should be justified by the value they provide in terms of improved research outcomes and efficiency. This includes considering both initial investment and ongoing operational costs [14; 20; 22]. It is important to assess whether the AI tools are financially accessible to researchers. Availability of free versions, trials, or institutional licenses can be a deciding factor. Ability to Respond to Complex Queries:The tool should efficiently respond to complex questions and offer advanced conversational support [14]. Consider both free and commercial options; the tool's value should justify the investment [7]. Support and Community:A strong support network and active user community can enhance the usability and troubleshooting of AI tools. This includes access to documentation, forums, and customer support [15; 23]. Support and training are vital for responsible AI use, enabling researchers to maximize benefits and minimize risks [30]. Integration with Other Tools:Integration with other tools helps streamline the research workflow by automating data transfer and reducing manual effort [14; 17]. Evaluate the ability of AI tools to integrate with other AI academic tools. Evaluate the AI tool's ability to integrate with other software programs and databases used in research. Reputation and Reviews:The reputation of AI tools, as reflected in user reviews and academic literature, can provide insights into their reliability and effectiveness. Tools with positive feedback and proven track records are preferable [22; 23]. Positive reviews and a strong reputation can indicate that the tool is well regarded and likely to deliver on its promises. Selecting a GenAI tool for academic research involves a thoughtful evaluation process that considers several criteria to ensure the chosen GenAI tool effectively supports research activities such as data analysis, idea generation, and information synthesis. The GenAI tool should align with research objectives and be financially accessible with free versions or trials available. It must provide accurate information based on credible sources and efficiently respond to complex questions while adhering to data security standards and ethical research practices. Transparency in how it generates information and makes decisions is important, as well as the ability to avoid biases and integrate with other academic tools. Regularupdates and feedback from the academic community are also essential in evaluating the tool's effectiveness and utility in practice. Selecting GenAI tools for academic research requires careful consideration of criteria such as accuracy, transparency, ethical compliance, adaptability to specific research needs, user-friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and access to training resources. When selecting GenAI tools for academic research, certain criteria are more important due to their direct impact on research quality, efficiency, and ethical compliance. Accuracy and reliability are essential to ensure that outputs align with credible sources, preventing misinformation and maintaining the integrity of scholarly work. Transparency in data sources and decision-making processes is important for replicability and trustworthiness in research outcomes. Ethical compliance must be prioritized to address biases, privacy concerns, and authorship accountability, ensuring adherence to academic standards. User-friendliness enhances accessibility for researchers with varying technical expertise, while cost-effectiveness ensures equitable access to both free and paid solutions. Support and training resources are vital for responsible AI use, enabling researchers to maximize tool benefits while minimizing risks. When choosing a GenAI tool for academic research, it is important to consider criteria such as functionality and objectives, ease of use and accessibility, scalability and integration, data quality and security, support and community, and reputation and reviews.