# Evaluating and Ranking SCPMS Enablers Using ISM and SWARA
## 4 Results
### Phase 2
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Enablers** & **SCPMS Enablers** & **E5** & **E3** & **E4** & **E13** & **E14** & **E6** & **E11** & **E12** & **E8** & **E1** & **E2** & **E10** & **E9** & **E7** & **DP** \\ \hline E5 & \begin{tabular}{c} Customization for \\ sustainability \\ \end{tabular} & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \hline E3 & \begin{tabular}{c} Intelligent SCPMS for \\ Industry 4.0 \\ \end{tabular} & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 \\ \hline E4 & \begin{tabular}{c} Information \\ transparency \\ \end{tabular} & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \\ \hline E13 & \begin{tabular}{c} Technology for I4.0 \\ \end{tabular} & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \\ \hline E14 & \begin{tabular}{c} Continuous \\ improvement through \\ innovation \\ \end{tabular} & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \\ \hline E6 & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Managerial readiness \\ \end{tabular} & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 \\ \hline E11 &
\begin{tabular}{c} Digital readiness \\ \end{tabular} & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Lower triangular matrix. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline
**Enablers** & **Reachability Set** & **Antecedent Set** & **Intersection Set** & **Level** \\ \hline E1 & 1, 2, 10 & 1, 2, 7, 9, 10 & 1, 2, 10 & VI \\ \hline E2 & 1, 2, 10 & 1, 2, 7, 9, 10 & 1, 2, 10 & VI \\ \hline E3 & 3 & 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 3 & II \\ \hline E4 & 4, 13, 14 & 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 4, 13, 14 & III \\ \hline E5 & 5 & 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 5 & I \\ \hline E6 & 6, 11, 12 & 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 6, 11, 12 & IV \\ \hline E7 & 7 & 7 & 7 & VIII \\ \hline E8 & 8 & 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 8, & V \\ \hline E9 & 9 & 7, 9 & 9 & VII \\ \hline E10 & 1, 2, 10 & 1, 2, 7, 9, 10 & 1, 2, 10 & VI \\ \hline E11 & 6, 11, 12 & 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 & 6, 11, 12 & IV \\ \hline E12 & 6, 11, 12 & 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 6, 11, 12 & IV \\ \hline E13 & 4, 13, 14 & 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 4, 13, 14 & III \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: All iteration results (II–VIII) of SCFMS enablers. All the SCPM enablers were rearranged following the systematic order according to the various level partitions to form the ISM model. Thus, all 14 SCPMS enablers were connected as per their contextual relationship. Figure 2 depicts the ISM model after it was created. The MICMAC diagram may be created using the driving power and reliance of each of the 14 SCPM enablers. Each SCPM enabler is categorized into four groups depending on its driving power and dependence. Groups I to IV are termed MICMAC clusters. Thus, all SCPM enablers are classified into appropriate groups as shown in Figure 3. For example, 'waste minimization (E3)' takes the position of a dependent enabler, whereas 'SC 4.0 performance measurement awareness (E7)' is an independent enabler. Similarly,'managerial readiness (E6)' falls in the linkage enabler group.