## 3 Results
### Descriptive Analysis of Scoring Actions
Generally, most scoring actions occur when the judoka who scores is in a favorable position or mounted on top. The distribution of scoring actions based on the situation of the non-scoring judoka on the ground is homogeneous across different weight categories, as no significant differences were found (\(\chi^{2}=48.663\), \(p=0.446\)). A higher number of scoring actions occurs when the non-scoring judoka is in an unfavorable position, in all fours, or in a prone position. The distribution of scoreable actions based on the action of the judoka who scores on the ground is heterogeneous among the different weight categories, as significant differences were found (\(\chi^{2}=36.744\), \(p=0.046\)). The effect size test indicated that the relationship was strong (\(V=0.420\)). Generally, a higher number of scoreable actions occur when the judoka who scores performs a combination, a direct action, or a turnover. In the \(-60\) kg category, the most frequently used action is the turnover, which also has a frequency greater than expected (corrected residual 2.3). Conversely, the direct action has a frequency lower than expected (corrected residual \(-2.1\)). In the \(-66\) kg, \(-73\) kg, \(-90\) kg, and \(-100\) kg categories, the most frequently used action is direct action. In the \(-90\) kg category, both the direct action and the action of withdrawing the entangled leg with the free leg have a frequency greater than expected (corrected residuals 2.2 and 2, respectively). Finally, in the \(-81\) kg and \(+100\) kg categories, the most frequently used action is the combination. In the \(-81\) kg category, this action has a frequency greater than expected (corrected residual 2.2), while the direct action has a frequency lower than expected (corrected residual \(-2.1\)). The distribution of scoring actions based on the technique group employed by the judoka who scores on the ground is heterogeneous across the different weight categories. Significant differences were found among these categories (\(\chi^{2}=23.37\), \(p=0.025\)). The effect size test indicated that the relationship was strong (\(V=0.474\)). In general, a greater number of scoring actions occur when the scoring judoka employs a technique from the osaekomi waza group. In some weight categories, this is the only technique used to score (\(-60\) kg, \(-81\) kg, and \(+100\) kg). Specifically, these techniques had a higher than expected frequency in the \(+100\) kg category (corrected residual 2). Strangulations also proved effective in the \(-66\) kg, \(-90\) kg, and \(-100\) kg categories, with a higher than expected frequency in the \(-66\) kg category (corrected residual 2.2). Finally, joint locks were only useful in the \(-73\) kg and \(-90\) kg categories, exhibiting a higher than expected frequency in the \(-73\) kg category (corrected residual 2.5). The distribution of scoring actions based on the technique used by the judoka who scores on the ground is homogeneous across different weight categories. No significant differences were found among these (\(\chi^{2}=85.18\), \(p=0.056\)). A greater number of scoring actions occurs when the scoring judoka employs a technique of yoko-shiho-gatame or tate-shiho-gatame from the osaekomi waza group, or okuri-eri-jime from the shime-waza group. The distribution of scoring actions based on the score following a scoring action on the ground is homogeneous across the different weight categories, as no significant differences were found among them (\(\chi^{2}=10.401\), \(p=0.109\)). In general, there are more scoring actions that result in ippon than in wazari in all weight categories, except for 81 kg and \(+100\) kg, where more wazari are achieved, especially in the 81 kg category.