## 5 Discussion  
Based on the research findings, the following conclusions are drawn:  
Given the widespread impact of AI on the field of education, China demonstrates a high level of attention toward the development of AIGC technologies, such as ChatGPT, in education. Despite the prohibition of non-China-based AIGC tools like ChatGPT in the country, the influence of AIGC on education remains undeniable, garnering significant attention. This observation is supported by the following three points:  
1. Sentiment Distribution: Positive sentiments significantly outweigh negative ones, indicating public support for the disruption AIGC brings to the traditional education sector. This result is markedly different from previous work [5], where negative sentiments toward ChatGPT were found to be lower than positive sentiments. 2. Thematic Insights: Frequently appearing keywords, such as \"education\", \"ChatGPT\", \"school\", \"future\", and \"work\" suggest that Chinese people believe AIGC development will greatly impact the country's educational landscape. This result is clearly more focused on the education sector, whereas previous work [6] was broader in scope, which hinders in-depth research specifically within the educational domain. 3. LDA Topic Analysis: Both societal and institutional dimensions, including schools, teachers, and students, have been influenced by AIGC. Different from the previous works [69; 70], this study employs quantitative methods to derive the keywords and sentiment scores for the six topics, revealing that each emphasizes different aspects, yet they overlap with one another. This effectively demonstrates the complex interconnections among the various elements within the educational ecosystem. Compared to earlier AI technologies, the new generation of AIGC is not only more advanced but also widely applied across various societal domains. This gives AIGC a more profound and far-reaching impact on education, touching nearly all aspects of society. To comprehensively examine this influence, a broader perspective and a more universal framework are required. Different from previous studies [5; 6; 42], this study provides a more comprehensive and in-depth analysis through the combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. The TOE framework is employed to analyze the impact of AI on education across three dimensions: Technology, Organization, and Environment. 1. From a technological perspective, AIGC offers students a more personalized and efficient learning experience, which is one of the reasons for the high levels of positive sentiment. From Topic 1, 3, and 6, it is evident that the advanced nature and maturity of AIGC influence its effectiveness in educational applications. The successful implementation and promotion of generative AI in education often depends on a comprehensive and structured framework [71; 72]. This framework must address not only the capabilities of AI technology itself but also the readiness of educational institutions in terms of technological infrastructure. For effective AI implementation, educational institutions require adequate hardware and software support, including cloud computing, big data processing capabilities, the widespread use of intelligent devices, and robust network infrastructure. Many regions have already integrated ChatGPT into classrooms to enhance teaching effectiveness and student learning experiences. For instance, on 1 June 2023, the Hong Kong University of Scienceand Technology became the first institution in Hong Kong to officially provide a localized version of ChatGPT [73]. This move reflects the growing recognition of the importance of AI tools, especially generative AI, in enhancing learning experiences. ChatGPT and similar AI tools can provide instant learning assistance and recommend personalized learning paths based on individual student needs. However, complex AI tools may pose adaptation challenges for teachers and students, making usability and user-friendly interfaces critical for their success in education.