## 5 Discussion of an Improved Theoretical Model  
In the interview that was conducted as part of this research, we had seven participants, in which the participants gave suggestions for modifying the model if they thought that modification was needed. They suggested what should be added to the problems, what  
Figure 4: Improved theoretical model. connections should still exist between the problems, etc. They presented their experiences with these problems and how they look at these problems from their point of view based on many years of experience in the company. It can be said that most of them agreed with the presented model, and a few of them suggested other significant problems to add to the model. For the most part, the participants considered that all the mentioned problems were important to be included in the model. P#2 stated that he does not like being called to meetings several times a day. It happens that some team members have nothing new to add in the meeting because they are still working on the same task, and the work on the task often lasts for several days; this leads to the engineer having nothing new to say, which develops negativity towards the meeting. _\"It is not good when the management call to some meetings several times during the day, so several hours a day are spent in different meetings, which leads to the exhaustion of team members\". It points to potential changes in the model: \"Meetings are held frequently\" should perhaps be linked to the new issue \"some team members do not have new updates during the meeting\". Maybe it's already included through some problems, \"Meetings are held frequently\" should be linked to that new problem, and that problem should be linked to the problem of \"team members not being active in meetings\". As a result, team members waste time on regular tasks. Perhaps even the new problem should be linked to \"motivation\" or even better to \"negative attitude towards the meeting\"._  
P#3 stated that a connection needs to be made between meeting skipping and people not actively participating. He also stated that motivation is connected with the fact that meetings are held frequently. _\"When a week is arranged for me to have many meetings, even if they are important meetings, if there are many, it simply cannot help but have a bad effect on motivation. I think that communication should be connected with the fact that some team members do not actively participate in meetings. If someone does not actively participate in meetings, that is specifically a problem in communication and leads to even bigger problems in communication. Communication is one of the most important factors because, for example, we linked it to motivation and to negative attitudes towards meetings and to trust. Communication is the main thing that must be good in a team for a team to work well. I think some routine meetings should be reduced to a written form in the form of a written survey where people can get questions to answer and it all reaches the manager at a certain time where the manager will see everything he wants and I will be able to read everything. And then he won't spend so much time in meetings, while everyone has the opportunity to write what he has to say. Depending on the work dynamics the relationship of the team members and the communication in the team, it depends on what types of meetings should be held in writing and person. Each team could write trivia meetings for themselves and it depends on the team\"._  
The next participant, P#4, stated that \"loss of focus\" should be associated with \"less time spent on regular tasks\" because if one does not have focus, one has no will to work, regardless of meetings. _\"Maybe connect that'meetings too often' with 'loss of focus' because if you have meetings every two hours and you have to do something for a long time, you need better focus. If several times a day several meetings don't go in order, and you have breaks between meetings, say an hour, you cannot perform your regular tasks attentively.