## 5 Data Analysis Results and Research Findings
### Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
The 70.079% total variance explained by the EFA indicates that the scale successfully explains the measured quality of the measurement instrument and the underlying relationship of the measured variables in examining the influence of the challenging factors on the government's intention to adopt cloud services. Although GovtInt4 has a 0.442 loading slightly above the minimum acceptable loadings, it was retained due to its theoretical relevance and the assertion that a component's items with a minimum factor loading of above 0.40 on the relevant factors [107; 121; 122; 123] could be retained. However, we acknowledge the lower loading compared to other items and recommend its re-evaluation in future studies. Appendix A.1 shows the constructs and the measurement items with their factor loadings. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{**KMO and Bartlett’s Test**} \\ \hline Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy & 0.731 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity} & Approx. Chi-Square & 1455.806 \\ \cline{2-3}  & df & 435 \\ \cline{2-3}  & Sig. & \textless{}0.001 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Kaiser-Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Measurement Scale Common Variance Values**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Measurement Scale Common Variance Values Above 0.40**} \\ \hline \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Communalities**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Communalities**} \\ \hline  & **Initial** & **Extraction** & **Initial** & **Extraction** \\ \hline Priva1 & 1.000 & 0.694 & Priva1 & 1.000 & 0.694 \\ Priva2 & 1.000 & 0.570 & Priva2 & 1.000 & 0.570 \\ Priva3 & 1.000 & 0.835 & Priva3 & 1.000 & 0.835 \\ Priva4 & 1.000 & 0.729 & Priva4 & 1.000 & 0.729 \\ GovtF1 & 1.000 & 0.309 & GovtF2 & 1.000 & 0.646 \\ GovtF2 & 1.000 & 0.646 & GovtF3 & 1.000 & 0.621 \\ GovtF3 & 1.000 & 0.621 & GovtF4 & 1.000 & 0.672 \\ GovtF4 & 1.000 & 0.672 & GovtF5 & 1.000 & 0.662 \\ GovtF5 & 1.000 & 0.662 & GovtF6 & 1.000 & 0.611 \\ GovtF6 & 1.000 & 0.611 & GovtF7 & 1.000 & 0.485 \\ GovtF7 & 1.000 & 0.485 & GovtF8 & 1.000 & 0.645 \\ GovtF8 & 1.000 & 0.645 & PerfEx1 & 1.000 & 0.817 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Community coefficient values. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Total Variance Explained** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Cumulative** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings** \\ \end{tabular} } \\ \cline{2-10} \multirow{2}{*}{**Component**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Initial Eigenvalues**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **\% of** \\ **Variance** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Total** \\ **\end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **\% of** \\ **Variance** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Cumulative** \\ **\%** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\begin{tabular}{c} **Total** \\ **\end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} **\% of** \\ **Variance** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Cumulative** \\ **\%** \\ \end{tabular} } \\ \hline  
\hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Total variance explained.