## 3 Verification and Analysis  
### Interference Determination  
In electromagnetic countermeasures, common types of jamming include targeted jamming, blocking jamming, tracking jamming, comb jamming, and scanning jamming. In  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Number** & **Type** & **Item** & **Identification** & **Format** & **Remarks** \\ \hline
1 & Input & Longitude & blon & double & Range: \(-90\) to \(90\) degrees \\ \hline
2 & Input & Latitude & blat & double & Range: \(-180\) to \(180\) degrees \\ \hline
3 & Input & Altitude & bh & double & Unit: m \\ \hline
4 & Input & Power & bp & int & Unit: W \\ \hline
5 & Input & Antenna Gain & bGt\({}_{\text{t}}\)bG\({}_{\text{r}}\) & double &
\begin{tabular}{c} Unit: dB, Including the gain of the receiving \\ antenna and the transmitting antenna \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
6 & Input &
\begin{tabular}{c} Frequency to be \\ Selected \\ \end{tabular} & bf & double & Range: \(30\) MHz to \(3000\) MHz \\ \hline
7 & Input & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Frequency Band \\ Priority \\ \end{tabular} & bfp & double &
\begin{tabular}{c} Priority expressed as a percentage; higher \\ percentage indicates higher priority \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
8 & Input & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Antenna Radiation \\ Pattern \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} band \\ \end{tabular} & double & Unit: dB \\ \hline
9 & Output &
\begin{tabular}{c} Jamming \\ Frequency Band \\ \end{tabular} & bbf & double & Range: \(30\) MHz to \(3000\) MHz \\ \hline
10 & Output & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Jamming Success \\ Probability \\ \end{tabular} & bbfp & double &
\begin{tabular}{c} Probability of jamming success expressed as a percentage; higher \\ percentage; higher \\ likelihood of successful jamming \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
11 & Output &
\begin{tabular}{c} Jamming Success \\ Status \\ \end{tabular} & biter & char & Success/Failure \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 4: Red team defensive agent parameters description.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline  & & & \\ \hline Input: the input listed in Table 4. & & O(1) & O(1) \\ Output: listed in Table 4. & & O(1) & O(1) \\ Begin\{ & & O(1) & O(1) \\ \hline Step1: initialization. & & & \\ Load scene. & & O(1) & O(1) \\ Read input information. & & & \\ \hline Step2: Frequency selection for attacking links based on **MCCFR**. & & & \\ Initialization: Strategy and Regret. & & & O(1) \\ for i = 1:\(Na\) & & & O(1) \\ for j = 1:\(N\) & & & O(1) \\
**bBF** = **MC**(**bF**). & & & O(1) \\ Simulated confrontation. & & & O(Na+N) & O(1) \\ Accumulated regret. & & & O(1) \\ Update strategy. & & & O(1) \\ end & & & O(1) \\ end & & & O(1) \\ Determine the final frequency by **CFR** with strategy and **bfp**. & & O(1) & O(1) \\ \hline Step3: Attacking link calculation. & & & \\ Attack red intelligent agents. & & & O(1) & O(1) \\ Calculate **L** by **ITU-R** **P.525**. & & & \\ \hline Step4: Output the parameters in Table 4. & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 3: The spectrum allocation for the blue team’s attacking agents.  
this study, the blue team attacking agents use blocking jamming to conduct interference attacks against the red team defensive agents.  
Under blocking jamming, whether the blue team's agents interfere with the red team's agents is determined by the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (_SINR_). If _SINR_ > 10 dB, it is considered that the blue team's agents have successfully interfered with the red team's agents. The level of interference is calculated based on the ratio of the bandwidth of the jamming signal to the bandwidth of the communication signal, the following holds:  
\[R_{bw}=B_{j}/B_{s} \tag{4}\]  
where \(B_{j}\) is the bandwidth of the jamming signal (MHz), and \(B_{s}\) is the bandwidth of the communication signal (MHz).  
The classification standards for blocking jamming levels are shown in Table 5. \(R_{bw}\) is the ratio of jamming signal bandwidth to communication signal bandwidth.