###### Abstract  
Telerehabilitation can be a valuable addition to conventional rehabilitation after a stroke. The aim of the presented study was to assess the feasibility and integrability of a newly developed platform and service model to offer telerehabilitation in different settings in an initial field trial. The field trial was conducted in two clinics and a freelance therapy setting in Austria and Slovenia. Data were gathered using questionnaires for patients, therapists, and, if applicable, relatives. The data were analyzed using descriptive methods. Three patients were treated by seven therapists (occupational, physio, speech). During the test, the patients completed more than 25 exercises per week on average. The usability of the system, in general, was high, with slightly better results for the patients. Overall, the patients stated that telerehabilitation is a good addition to conventional therapy, although the quality of online therapy is not as high as face-to-face therapy. The therapists reported that the system was easy to use but had some obstacles in exercise preparation. The integrability in daily life was good, according to the patients. For the therapists, integrability was average, as the test showed some obstacles in the provision of services beyond the clinical setting. Further studies are required to elaborate on the quality of teletherapeutic interventions in the proposed flexible service model. Keywords:telehabilitation; feasibility study; stroke; technology platform; service model +
Footnote †: journal: Medical  
system and awareness of its applicability significantly influenced acceptance. Moreover, the perceived endorsement and support by peers (subjective norms) for integrating technologies into daily routines strongly impacted acceptance [4]. The incorporation of digital therapeutics, including the technological components of telerehabilitation approaches, into the existing healthcare and care pathways can have a positive influence on acceptance levels [5]. The minimized need for travel paints telerehabilitation as a valuable complement to traditional therapeutic interventions and could be considered a potential replacement for traditional rehabilitation in rural areas without easy access to in-person services [6]. Within a telerehabilitation framework, patients often manifest heightened self-efficacy and motivation, particularly regarding the execution of exercises at home. Building upon the sentiment of its efficacy [1], the effectiveness of telerehabilitation mirrors that of conventional methods, especially concerning neurological disorders. An advantage for such patients lies in the intensified treatment regimen and its seamless integration into their daily routines [7]. Telerehabilitation can positively influence activity performance, quality of life, and participation of individuals with brain injury [8]. Furthermore, telerehabilitation can improve upper extremity and arm motor function in post-stroke recovery [9; 10]. The application of telerehabilitation can also train cognitive functions and positively affect memory [9]. Exercise performance is dependent on patients' motivation, while the inclusion of games, especially in place of repetitive exercises, is preferred [9]. However, telerehabilitation is not without challenges, as it lacks physical interaction, which can inadvertently lead to an oversight in patient diagnosis. Moreover, therapists express a preference for all-in-one platforms with intuitive usability. Many practitioners view the prevalent telerehabilitation methods of delivering exercises as cumbersome [11]. Common barriers to the integration and sustainable adoption of telerehabilitation are acceptance and usability of the technology, specifically regarding ease of use [12]. The gap of knowledge lies in assessing the integrability and acceptance of telerehabilitation in conventional rehabilitation pathways by applying a technology platform and service model that was developed with a clear focus on high usability for patients and therapists.