## 5 Conclusions  
Our hypothesis that RPE and RPE\({}_{\text{dur}}\) would have correlations with most of the EXLD parameters and that the magnitude would be stronger with the second method was confirmed. Moreover, this tendency remains in the different-duration microcyles. On the contrary, our hypothesis for Hooper was partially supported, as the findings revealed that the wellness score responses vary, depending on the length of the week. In MIC5, it appears that the less recovery between the games is being reflected in FTG responses. In MIC6, MIC7, and MIC9, the best predictors were SRN and FTG, but in MIC6, where the training load was reduced, the correlations were less. We suggest the use of the RPE\({}_{\text{dur}}\) method as a means to obtain a more comprehensive assessment of the EXLD (in the absence of heart rate monitoring) during microcyles of various durations. Concerning the [PERSON] questionnaire outcome, in short weeks, it should be expected to have an elevated score of FTG. At that point, the practitioners should assess these responses from a different perspective. On the other hand, in large microcyles, SRN and FTG can be applied to adjust the training load and protect the players from overloading. On the contrary, the practicality of SLP is questionable and could possibly be avoided, leading to a less complicated questionnaire that the players could use. Finally, it is recommended that fitness coaches and practitioners use a multidisciplinary approach, combining perceived wellness, exertion, and GPS monitoring tools. This can enhance weekly planning by manipulating better training load, fatigue, and recovery. All of these could lead to a decrease in the possibility of overload injuries and aid players in achieving peak performance. The following supporting information can be downloaded at: [[https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14156767/s1](https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14156767/s1)]([https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14156767/s1](https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14156767/s1)). [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] designed the study and provided critical feedback on the manuscript; [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] collected and processed the data. [PERSON] analyzed the data. [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] revised the first draft. [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] conducted the statistical analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. This research received no external funding. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Physical Education and Sport Science at Thessaloniki (App. No. 99/2021, 1 December 2021). Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to research rules. The authors thank the coach and players of the team who participated in the study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. References  
[PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Perceived exertion related to heart rate and blood lactate during arm and leg exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. **1987**, _56_, 679-685. [CrossRef] [PubMed]  
[PERSON]. Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. **1998**, _30_, 1164-1168. [CrossRef] [PubMed][PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Use of RPE-based training load in soccer. _Med. Sci. Sports Exerc._**2004**, _36_, 1042-1047. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] and [PERSON] (1995) [PERSON]; [PERSON] Monitoring overtraining in athletes: Recommendations. _Sports Med._**1995**, _20_, 321-327. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* [PERSON] et al.