## 5 Results and Discussion
### The Affecting Mechanism of Space Reconstruction on Multi-Dimensional Environments  
(1) The \"sightseeing and settlement symbiosis village\" generally develops better multi-dimensional environments than the \"relocation village\". In terms of overall resident satisfaction, Doushan Village (69.89) outperformed Tianquan Community (63.73). In the criterion layer, Doushan Village scored higher than Tianquan Community in all criteria. In the index layer, 13 of the 14 indexes in Doushan Village were higher than those in Tianquan Community, except for that of policy support. Therefore, the multi-dimensional environments in \"the sightseeing and settlement symbiosis\" Doushan Village were better than those of \"the relocation\" Tianquan Community. The gap between the two was strongest in management environment, especially in the sub-layer of management status, with scores of 70.50 and 57.17, respectively. (2) Ecological environment: the direct benefit of rural tourism in the space reproduction process  
The scores of the residents' satisfaction with their living environment were 76.52 and 81.13, respectively, both ranking first in their respective criterion layers. In the specific sub-indexes of the living environment, the ecological environment ranked first and second in each settlement. Therefore, ecological environment is the significant improvement in the space reconstruction in rural tourist settlements. The changing mechanisms of the ecological environments in the two settlements' space reconstruction processes are as follows. 1 Tianquan Community is endowed with an advantageous ecological environment, with important natural resources including 9 km\({}^{2}\) Tianquan Lake and 61.58 km\({}^{2}\) of Tieshan Temple National Forest Park. Tianquan Lake is the largest mountain lake in the northern Jiangsu Province, and its water quality consistently maintains water quality above the second-class drinking water requirement. In Tieshan Temple National Forest Park, there are 533 species of higher plants, 170 species of migratory birds, 40 species of wild animals, \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Objective Layer Score (Z)** & **Criterion Layer Score (A)** & **Index Layer Score (B)** & **Rank** \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Residents’ Overall Satisfaction (69.89)} & \multirow{8}{*}{A2 Human Environment (80.24)} & B1 Housing Environment (80.50) & 4 \\  & & B2 Road Environment (79.00) & 5 \\  & & B3 Healthcare Environment (78.00) & 6 \\  & & B4 Hygienic Environment (84.50) & 1 \\  & & B5 Ecological Environment (84.00) & 2 \\ \cline{2-3}  & \multirow{8}{*}{A2 Human Environment (80.24)} & B6 Security Environment (83.50) & 3 \\  & & B7 Cultural Activities (75.50) & 7 \\  & & B8 Inhabited by Outsiders (72.00) & 8 \\ \cline{2-3}  & \multirow{8}{*}{A3 Management Environment (64.16)} & B9 Policy Support (57.00) & 14 \\  & & B10 Distribution of Benefits (61.50) & 13 \\ \cline{1-1}  & & B11 Management Status (70.50) & 9 \\ \cline{1-1}  & & B12 Land Circulation Subsidy (63.00) & 11 \\ \cline{1-1}  & & A4 Economic Environment (69.50) & 10 \\ \cline{1-1}  & & B14 Economic Income (62.50) & 12 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Residents’ satisfaction scores with multi-dimensional environments in Doushan Village.