## Appendix B Inference and Computing Resources  
For local LLM inference, we used an Ollama server on a MacBook M3 Pro with these specifications (relevant to LLM processing):  
- 12-core CPU (6 performance cores and 6 efficiency cores)  
- 18-core GPU  
- 16-core Neural Engine  
- 150 GB/s memory bandwidth  
Using Ollama, we ran inference on smaller open-weight models for a total of 40 h of inference time:  
- DeepSeek-R1-7B (25 h)  
- Llama-3.1-7B (5 h)  
* [PERSON] and [PERSON] (2024) [PERSON]; [PERSON] ConsRAG: Minimize LLM Hallucinations in the Legal Domain. In _Legal Knowledge and Information Systems_; Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; Volume 395, pp. 327-332. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] et al. (2024) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of RAG-enhanced vs. Human-Generated Medical Templates. _medRxiv_**2024**.
* [PERSON] et al. (2020) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In Proceedings of the 34 th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS '20, Online, Red Hook, NY, USA, 6-12 December 2020.
* [PERSON] et al. (2021) [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversation. In _Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021_; [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON]; Association for Computational Linguistics: Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 2021; pp. 3784-3803. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] et al. (2025) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Emotion-Aware Embedding Fusion in Large Language Models (Flan-T5, Llama 2, DeepSeek-R1, and ChatGPT 4) for Intelligent Response Generation. _AI_**2025**, 6, 56. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] (2012) [PERSON] The user-centered design of a recommender system for a universal library catalogue. In Proceedings of the Microceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys '12, New York, NY, USA, 9-13 September 2012; pp. 337-340. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] Leveraging AI in Cataloging: What Works, and Why? _Tech. Serv. Q._**2024**, 41, 375-383. [CrossRef]
* [PERSON] (2024) [PERSON] Factors influencing librarian adoption of ChatGPT technology for entrepreneurial support: A study protocol. _J. Econ. Technol._**2024**, 2, 166-173. [CrossRef]
* (24) Primary Research Group Inc. _Survey of Use of Bard, Bing & ChatGPT for Academic Library Cataloging_; Technical Report; Primary Research Group: New York, NY, USA, 2023; 96P.
* [PERSON] et al. (2020) [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] The OpenScience Slovenia metadata dataset. _Data Brief_**2020**, _28_, 104942. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
* [PERSON] (1990) [PERSON] String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. _Proc. Sect. Surv. Res. Methods_**1990**. Available online: [[https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED325505](https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED325505)]([https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED325505](https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED325505)) (accessed on 10 June 2025).  
**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.