## 4 The Results
### The Benefits of Bike-Sharing Systems
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Variable** & **Mean** & **Median** & **Min** & **Max** &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Standard** \\ **Deviation** \\ \end{tabular} & **Skewness** & **Kurtosis** \\ \hline B1—Eco-friendly & 3.82 & 4.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.29 & \(-\)0.85 & \(-\)0.31 \\ \hline B2—Avoids traffic jams & 3.74 & 4.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.03 & \(-\)0.54 & \(-\)0.20 \\ \hline B3—Economical–low usage cost & 3.53 & 4.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.12 & \(-\)0.29 & \(-\)0.75 \\ \hline B4—Speed–timesaving & 3.25 & 3.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.08 & \(-\)0.15 & \(-\)0.66 \\ \hline B5—Opportunity for physical exercise & 3.80 & 4.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.17 & \(-\)0.78 & \(-\)0.17 \\ \hline B6—Promotes health & 3.84 & 4.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.19 & \(-\)0.79 & \(-\)0.32 \\ \hline B7—Improves physical fitness & 3.86 & 4.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.16 & \(-\)0.81 & \(-\)0.12 \\ \hline B8—Personal image enhancement & 2.73 & 3.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.29 & 0.18 & \(-\)0.96 \\ \hline B9—High availability & 3.25 & 3.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 0.99 & 0.27 & \(-\)0.58 \\ \hline B10—No need to own a personal bicycle & 3.37 & 3.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.40 & \(-\)0.31 & \(-\)1.13 \\ \hline B11—Possibility to combine with other public & 3.43 & 3.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.19 & \(-\)0.14 & \(-\)0.93 \\ \hline B12—No worry about bicycle theft & 3.75 & 4.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.23 & \(-\)0.71 & \(-\)0.46 \\ \hline B13—Possibility to transport shopping items & 3.15 & 3.00 & 1.00 & 5.00 & 1.17 & 0.09 & \(-\)0.88 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Basic statistics for benefits to moving abound by bike from bike-sharing system. however, dispersion does allow for a thought that perceptions might vary depending on health goals or preferences of the individual. The standard deviation values indicate that users show greater consensus regarding the system's practical and time-saving benefits, while responses concerning aspects such as image enhancement and the ability to carry shopping items exhibit higher variability. These differences suggest areas where user needs and expectations are more heterogeneous, highlighting opportunities for service customisation and targeted improvements. Most variables display a negative skew, suggesting a slight overall tendency for responses to cluster toward the higher end of the rating scale. Additionally, the kurtosis values for most variables are negative, indicating relatively flat and dispersed distributions compared to a normal distribution. From an innovativeness perspective, the benefits of bike-sharing systems reflect how well the system meets the evolution of transportation needs, introduces novelty in solutions, and corresponds to general trends in sustainability, health, and convenience. It will be appropriate to break down this analysis of the results from the perspective of several important factors: (i) health and physical fitness-related, or improvement in physical fitness 3.86; health promotion, 3.84; physical exercising 3.80--all these signs answer the call for growing societal concern about sedentary lifestyles and health-related problems. These aspects reflect the fact that bike-sharing systems take advantage of growing demands for active transportation, amalgamating convenience with physical activity. The high median scores--4.00 and mean scores--3.80, 3.84, and 3.86 suggest that users of this system really look at these systems as an innovative way to help bring about an improvement in public health in keeping with global changes toward more sustainable and health-conscious urban lifestyles. The emphasis on eco-friendliness, with a rating of 3.82, reflects the innovation of bike-sharing systems in promoting environmental sustainability. As people become more aware of climate change and urban pollution, bike-sharing provides a practical, low-carbon alternative to car usage.