## 4 Discussion  
The subjects studied showed a nearly balanced weight distribution of the feet, 52.33% left to 47.67% right. The forefoot load was 33.33% compared to the rearfoot with 66.67%. While the rear foot load was nearly identical between the left and right sides of the body (32.67% left to 33.67% right), the left forefoot showed a greater load (19.33%) than the \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**No Sport**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**1\(\times\)/Week Sport**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**2\(\times\)/Week Sport**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**>2\(\times\)/Week Sport**} & \\  & **(n = 20)** & **(n = 26)** & **(n = 17)** & **(n = 32)** & & & & \\ \cline{2-10}  & **Median** & **Min./Max.** & **Median** & **Min./Max.** & **Median** & **Min./Max.** & **Median** & **Min./Max.** & **_p Values_ & **Eta** \\ \hline Forefoot left (\%) & 19.33 & 10.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{18.67} & 8.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{17.67} & 10.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{21.84} & 5.67/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.59} & 0.02 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 34.33 & & & & & & & & \\ \hline Forefoot right (\%) & 14.50 & \multirow{2}{*}{12.17} & 3.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{29.33} & 13.00 & \multirow{2}{*}{13.00} & 1.67/ & \multirow{2}{*}{14.67} & 6.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.33} & 0.03 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline Rearfoot left (\%) & 31.33 & 19.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{32.67} & 17.67/ & \multirow{2}{*}{34.67} & 18.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{32.50} & 15.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.68} & 0.02 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 50.00 & & & & & & & \\ \hline Rearfoot right (\%) & 32.33 & 6.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{35.00} & 20.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{34.67} & 25.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{30.83} & 15.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.58} & 0.02 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 48.00 & & & & & & & \\ \hline Left foot (\%) & 52.17 & \multirow{2}{*}{41.67} & 38.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{51.00} & 40.67/ & \multirow{2}{*}{52.83} & 31.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.95} & 0.003 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 74.67 & & & & & & & \\ \hline Right foot (\%) & 47.84 & \multirow{2}{*}{25.33} & 47.50 & \multirow{2}{*}{49.00} & 35.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{47.17} & 34.67/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.95} & 0.003 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 58.33 & & & & & & & \\ \hline Forefoot (\%) & 35.17 & \multirow{2}{*}{22.33} & 30.34 & \multirow{2}{*}{56.33} & 22.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{30.33} & 20.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{36.00} & 21.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.20} & 0.05 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 62.33 & & & & & & & & \\ \hline Rearfoot (\%) & 64.84 & \multirow{2}{*}{37.67} & 43.67/ & \multirow{2}{*}{69.67} & 43.67/ & \multirow{2}{*}{67.67} & 49.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{64.00} & 47.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.20} & 0.05 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 77.67 & & & & & & & & \\ \hline Frontal sway (mm) & 11.00 & 6.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{11.34} & 5.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{9.00} & 3.67/ & \multirow{2}{*}{12.00} & 6.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.14} & 0.05 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 32.67 & & & & & & & & \\ \hline Sagittal sway (mm) & 17.17 & \multirow{2}{*}{36.33} & 16.83 & \multirow{2}{*}{8.67} & 27.67 & \multirow{2}{*}{14.67} & 7.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{15.00} & 4.00/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.72} & 0.01 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 36.33 & & & & & & & \\ \hline Ellipse area (cm\({}^{\text{2}}\)) & 1.20 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.38} & 0.38/ & \multirow{2}{*}{1.33} & 0.33/ & \multirow{2}{*}{1.07} & 0.22/ & \multirow{2}{*}{1.19} & 0.25/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.47} & 0.03 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 5.31 & & & & & & & & \\ \hline Ellipse width (cm) & 0.90 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.54} & 0.96 & 0.43/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.82} & 0.40/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.92} & 0.37/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.52} & 0.02 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 2.02 & & & & & & & & \\ \hline Ellipse height (cm) & 0.41 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.22} & 0.43 & \multirow{2}{*}{0.98} & 0.43/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.38} & 0.18/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.44} & 0.21/ & \multirow{2}{*}{0.35} & 0.03 \({}^{\text{1}}\) \\  & & 0.98 & & & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Comparison of the parameters of the equilibrium distribution and postural sway in test subjects.