###### Abstract  
External Human-Machine Interfaces (eHMIs) enhance pedestrian safety in interactions with autonomous vehicles (AVs) by signaling crossing risk based on time-to-arrival (TTA), categorized as low, medium, or high. This study compared five eHMI configurations (single-level low, medium, high; two-level low-medium, medium-high) against a three-level (low-medium-high) configuration to assess their impact on pedestrians' crossing decisions, mental workload (MW), and situation awareness (SA) in vehicle platoon scenarios under full and partial eHMI penetration. In a video-based experiment with 24 participants, crossing decisions were evaluated via temporal gap selection, MW via P300 event-related potentials in an auditory oddball task, and SA via the Situation Awareness Rating Technique. The three-level configuration outperformed single-level medium, single-level high, two-level low-medium, and two-level medium-high in gap acceptance, promoting safer decisions by rejecting smaller gaps and accepting larger ones, and exhibited lower MW than the two-level medium-high configuration under partial penetration. No SA differences were observed. Although the three-level configuration was generally appreciated, future research should optimize presentation to mitigate issues from rapid signal changes. Notably, the single-level low configuration showed comparable performance, suggesting a simpler alternative for real-world eHMI deployment.  
p edestrian-AV interaction; risk-warning eHMI; eHMI penetration rate within vehicle platoon; gap acceptance; mental workload; situation awareness +
Footnote †: journal: Applied sciences  
1
Footnote 1: Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China; [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (F.Y.)  
2
Footnote 2: Nottingham Ningbo China Beacons of Excellence Research and Innovation Institute, Ningbo 315101, China  
3
Footnote 3: Ningbo Global Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China  
4
Footnote 4: Correspondence: [EMAIL_ADDRESS]  
###### Abstract  
External Human-Machine Interfaces (eHMIs) enhance pedestrian safety in interactions with autonomous vehicles (AVs) by signaling crossing risk based on time-to-arrival (TTA), categorized as low, medium, or high. This study compared five eHMI configurations (single-level low, medium, high; two-level low-medium, medium-high) against a three-level (low-medium-high) configuration to assess their impact on pedestrians' crossing decisions, mental workload (MW), and situation awareness (SA) in vehicle platoon scenarios under full and partial eHMI penetration. In a video-based experiment with 24 participants, crossing decisions were evaluated via temporal gap selection, MW via P300 event-related potentials in an auditory oddball task, and SA via the Situation Awareness Rating Technique. The three-level configuration outperformed single-level medium, single-level high, two-level low-medium, and two-level medium-high in gap acceptance, promoting safer decisions by rejecting smaller gaps and accepting larger ones, and exhibited lower MW than the two-level medium-high configuration under partial penetration. No SA differences were observed. Although the three-level configuration was generally appreciated, future research should optimize presentation to mitigate issues from rapid signal changes. Notably, the single-level low configuration showed comparable performance, suggesting a simpler alternative for real-world eHMI deployment.