## 3 Results
### Subjective Scales

Table 1: ANOVA results for the subjective scale measures (mean (SD)). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Air Route Alternation**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Display Design**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Interaction**} \\ \cline{2-11}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**As**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Altered**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\(p\)**-Value**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**ES**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Interface 1**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Interface 2**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Interface 3**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\(p\)**-Value**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**ES**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\(p\)**-Value**} \\ \hline SPAM & \multirow{3}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} 0.958 \\ (0.015) \\ \end{tabular}  } & 0.873 & \multirow{3}{*}{00.002 * [FOOTNOTE:*]Footnote *: Significant difference at the 0.05 level; ** Significant difference at the 0.001 level. Partial n\({}^{2}\) was used to calculate the effect size (ES)} \\ RA (-) & (0.015) & (0.020) & & & & & & & \\
2275 & 2269 & \multirow{3}{*}{0.971} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.000 } & 2554 (267) & \multirow{3}{*}{2793 (104)} & \multirow{3}{*}{2168 (195)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.123} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.099} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.031 *} \\ RT (ms) & (182) & (156) & & & & & & & \\ Operation Accuracy (-) & \multirow{3}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} 0.975 \\ (0.008) \\ \end{tabular}  } & 0.672 & \multirow{3}{*}{\ \begin{tabular}{c} 0.672 \\ (0.019) \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{3}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} \textless{}0.001 ** \\ (0.0044) \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{3}{*}{0.881} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.836 (0.013)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.842 (0.010)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.791 (0.017)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.013 *} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.171} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.125} \\ Altitude & (0.963) & & & & & & & \\
0.017 & (0.044) & \multirow{3}{*}{\ \begin{tabular}{c} 0.001 ** \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{3}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} \textless{}0.001 ** \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{3}{*}{0.526} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.847 (0.026)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.863 (0.027)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.785 (0.024)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.014 *} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.195} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.138} \\ Speed & (0.972) & & & & & & & \\
0.028 & (0.028) & \multirow{3}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} 0.001 ** \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{3}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} 0.645 \\ (0.028) \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{3}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} 0.843 (0.029) \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{3}{*}{0.860 (0.018)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.797 (0.031)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.186} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.070} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.331} \\ Course & \begin{tabular}{c} 10.000 \\ \end{tabular}  & \ \begin{tabular}{c} 0.825 \\ (0.031) \\ \end{tabular}  & \multirow{3}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} \textless{}0.001 ** \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{3}{*}{0.585} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.914 (0.021)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.929 (0.023)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.896 (0.020)} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.450} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.034} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.450} \\ \hline \multicolumn{11}{c}{Note: * Significant difference at the 0.05 level; ** Significant difference at the 0.001 level. Partial n\({}^{2}\)\(p<0.001\)) and course operation accuracy (F (1, 23) = 32.360, \(p<0.001\)). The operation accuracy of both the speed and the course in the air-route-altered condition was lower than those in the air-route-as-planned condition.