## 5 Results/Findings
### Respondents' Profile
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**First-Order** & **Items Code** & **Items** & **Outer Loading** & **AVE** & **CR** & **Cronbach’s Alpha** \\ \hline \multirow{9}{*}{Fit Organization} & FO1 & I can apply my ability and talents & 0.777 & 0.677 & 0.913 & 0.880 \\  & FO2 & My Organization & 0.861 & & & & \\  & FO3 & My hope to fit & 0.887 & & & & \\  & & with the company’s culture. & 0.887 & & & & \\  & & My company’s & & & & & \\  & FO4 & responsibility and authority & 0.856 & & & & \\  & & are in line with my prospect. & & & & \\  & FO5 & My Organization has the same & 0.723 & & & & \\  & & values that I hold. & 0.735 & 0.583 & 0.892 & 0.852 \\ \hline \multirow{9}{*}{Intention to Stay} & ITS1 & I have the intention and desire to & 0.735 & 0.583 & 0.892 & 0.852 \\  & ITS1 & stay in this company working. & 1 have planned to continue & & & \\  & ITS2 & working for this & 0.878 & & & \\  & & company in the future. & & & & \\  & ITS3 & For me, continuing to work for & 0.824 & & & \\  & ITS3 & this company is very likely. & 0.824 & & & \\  & ITS4 & I expect to work at my present & 0.818 & & & \\  & ITS4 & company for as long as possible. & 1 would remain in this company & & & \\  & ITS5 & without unexpected & 0.697 & & & \\  & & circumstances. & & & & \\  & ITS6 & If I were utterly free to choose, I & & & & \\  & ITS6 & would prefer to continue working & 0.594 & & & \\  & & in this company. & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{9}{*}{Link Community} & LC1 & My spouse works & 0.734 & 0.556 & 0.862 & 0.801 \\  & LC2 & I live in my own house. & 0.733 & & & \\  & LC3 & My family roots & 0.778 & & & \\  & & are in this community. & & & & \\  & LC4 & My family members are living & 0.744 & & & \\  & LC4 & nearby to me. & 0.740 & & & \\  & LC5 & Most of my close friends are living & 0.740 & & & \\  & & nearby to me. & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{9}{*}{Link Organization} & LO1 & The Organization allows all & & & & \\  & LO1 & members to participate & 0.705 & 0.552 & 0.86 & 0.795 \\  & & in work committees. & & & & \\  & LO2 & I have a lot of freedom in this job & & & & \\  & LO2 & to pursue my goals. & 0.672 & & & \\  & Link & & The company bonus & 0.794 & & & \\  & Organization & LO3 & meets up my expectation. & & & \\  & LO4 & I would miss the respect of my & & & & \\  & LO4 & colleague if I left the job. & 0.799 & & & \\  & LO5 & A lot of co-workers depend on me & & & & \\  & LO5 & to help in achieving their work. & 0.736 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{9}{*}{S sacrifice Community} & SC1 & It would be tough for me & & & & \\  & & to leave my family. & 0.772 & 0.575 & 0.871 & 0.815 \\  & & If I left the community, I would & & & & \\  & SC2 & miss the love and & 0.781 & & & \\  & & respect of my friends. & & & & \\  & & The biggest sacrifice is getting & & & & \\  & SC3 & detached from my neighbor. & 0.731 & & & \\  & SC4 & I feel affection for my living area. & 0.700 & & & \\  & & I believe the prospects for & & & & \\  & SC5 & continuing employment with my & 0.802 & & & \\  & Organization are excellent. & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: _Cont._In comparison, most of the constructs' outer loadings were well above the minimum threshold value of 0.70. Indicators of outer loads below the 0.40 level have been withdrawn. However, if the analysis is exploratory, the loading scores should be at least 0.40 or greater than this score, according to several studies [60, 61]. According to these authors, however, the loading scores were well above the minimum value. The measurement model of the second-order formative structures was then tested afterwards. Specifically, Table 3 showed the outer weight, outer VIF, \(t\)-value and \(p\)-value for the relationship between the formative construct of On-the-job embeddedness components and Off-the-job embeddedness components. Subsequently, discriminant validity was tested, \"specifying the degree to which a concept by scientific standards is genuinely distinct from other constructs\" [55].