## 3 Performed Full-Scale/Model Test Comparisons
### Low-Rise Buildings
#### 3.2.2 Full-Scale Measurement Campaigns Undertaken by [PERSON]  
From the early 2000s, [PERSON] took advantage of the research opportunities offered by typhoons passing through south and southeast areas in China to measure typhon characteristics and the typhoon-induced responses of typical high-rise buildings [31; 32; 33; 34; 35]. These full-scale measurements were then utilized to validate the prior model tests (mainly force balance model tests) conducted at the structural design stages. In 1996, [PERSON] et al. [31] continuously measured the accelerations of the Di Wang Tower during the passage of Typhoon Sally, and it was found that the root-mean-square (rms) values of acceleration samples measured on the prototype were consistent with those obtained from the force balance model test. In 2005, [PERSON] et al. [32] discussed the structural responses measured on Central Plaza Tower in Hong Kong and the Di Wang Tower in Shenzhen during the passage of Typhoon Sally. According to a full-scale/model test comparison, the differences in the rms values of the acceleration samples between the full-scale and model test data were found to be in the range of 4.0-12.5% for the two tall buildings. In 2006, [PERSON] et al. [33] compared the wind effects on the Jin Mao Tower obtained at the full scale and the model scale. In the wind tunnel, both the suburban and the urban boundary layers were simulated for the force balance model tests and the mean and fluctuating forces on the building model were measured using a high-frequency force balance. Full-scale measurements of the wind effects on the Jin Mao Tower were conducted under typhoons. The model test data were found to be in good agreement with the full-scale measurement results. In 2007, [PERSON] et al. [34] presented some full-scale measurement results of the wind effects on Jin Mao Tower during the passage of Typhoon Rananim. The wind tunnel data obtained from the force balance model test were compared with the full-scale measurement results. It was found that differences in the acceleration standard deviation between the two experiments were 11.8% and 19.1% for two wind direction scenarios. In 2008, [PERSON] et al. [35] systematically presented the full-scale measurement results for the wind characteristics and wind-induced structural responses of four tall buildings (the Center in Hong Kong, Di Wang Tower in Shenzhen, CITIC Plaza Tower in Guangzhou, and Jin Mao Tower in Shanghai) during the passages of three typhoons. By comparing the full-scale measurements and the wind tunnel results, it was shown that the rms values of the acceleration samples measured with the prototype were consistent with those obtained from the model tests in general. The differences in the rms values of the acceleration samples between the two experiments were in the range of 9.3-19.1%. The details of [PERSON]'s studies are summarized in Table 2. Comparing Table 1 with Table 2, the following differences between [PERSON]'s and [PERSON]'s studies can be noted. (1) Due to the differences in meteorological conditions between inland areas in North America and coastal areas in East Asia, [PERSON] paid more attention to strong ABL wind events, while [PERSON] focused more on typhoon events. (2) Most of the measured results were of surface wind pressures in [PERSON]'s work, while the results were structural accelerations in [PERSON]'s work. Thus, [PERSON]'s studies and [PERSON]'s studies should provide references to the pressure measurement model tests and the force balance model tests, respectively. (3) The buildings selected by [PERSON] for full-scale measurements were more slender. Since the stronger resonance might be induced for flexible buildings, [PERSON] generally focused on the occupants' comfort. (4) [PERSON]'s engineering background concerned buildings of comparatively greater rigidity.