## 6 Conclusions  
In conclusion, the objectives set out to evaluate pedestrian access points between the trolleybus transportation system and the EFE services in the city of Valparaiso have been satisfactorily met. First, the study area was identified, and pedestrian accessibility elements were evaluated through the review of manuals, regulations, and field visits. This study area focuses on the Baron and Av. Argentina node, a key interconnection point between both transportation systems. Although comparisons with other areas of the city are recommended to establish a more efficient connection, relevant information was gathered for future improvements. A pedestrian accessibility evaluation system was designed that combines descriptive and numerical aspects, providing a comprehensive view of the situation. The evaluation of pedestrian access was carried out, and objective data were collected for a rigorous analysis. The results provided a clear understanding of the state of pedestrian routes and highlighted potential improvements or necessary interventions. In summary, it is concluded that accessibility in the evaluated sector is not the worst, but there is room for improvement. Conducting more specific studies for users with reduced mobility and considering additional elements that could affect pedestrians are recommended. Moreover, the importance of meeting accessibility standards on sidewalks and pedestrian crossings is emphasized. The results obtained highlight the need to ensure safe and comfortable mobility for pedestrians, promoting inclusion and improving the experience in public spaces. According to the descriptive method, the following conclusions were drawn. Regarding the sidewalks, it has been determined that most meet the established minimum widths, although some do not reach the minimum of 90 cm. In addition, relevant aspects such as the presence of obstacles and the condition of the pavement have been identified, which must be addressed to improve accessibility in these areas. Regarding pedestrian crossings, there is a need to improve markings and ensure the absence of obstacles. The presence of pedestrian curb cuts was positive at all evaluated crossings, but one case was identified where the marking is not aligned. Regarding sidewalks near public transport stops, the importance of having shelters and clear stop signs has been highlighted to improve the identification of proper locations for catching transportation. It has been observed that there is a lack of clear separation between the pedestrian strips and the waiting areas at the stops. In relation to the results of the pedestrian preference survey, it is evident that the condition of the pavement plays a significant role in the pedestrian experience. Focusing efforts on improving areas with unstable pavement to provide safer and more comfortable infrastructure is recommended. Addressing and solving pavement issues in these areas can significantly improve the pedestrian experience and promote greater walking mobility in the community. The numerical method used in this research has proven to be effective in evaluating the condition of pedestrian routes. The results obtained indicate that the evaluated sectors meet the established accessibility levels. However, only two blocks were identified that showed a good level of accessibility. These results are relevant for understanding and improving the quality of pedestrian routes, contributing to more accessible and pedestrian-friendly environments. The findings of this study can play a significant role in shaping urban policy-making and the design of urban features to enhance pedestrian accessibility to public transport. By providing a detailed understanding of the factors that influence pedestrian mobility and connectivity to transportation systems, these insights can be directly applied to improve urban infrastructure and policy decisions aimed at increasing inclusivity and efficiency within cities.