# Developing an Adaptive 3D Vertebrae Model of Scoliosis Patients for Customize Garment Design
## 5 Results and Discussion
### Developments of Adaptive Vertebra Model in a Body
The analysis of the two sagittal views shows that the path of the spine in the patient's back follows in an identical way to  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline
**Segment** & **H\({}_{750}\)** & **H\({}_{700}\)** & **H\({}_{650}\)** & **H\({}_{600}\)** & **H\({}_{550}\)** & **Sagital** & **H\({}_{650}\)** & **Coronal** & **H\({}_{650}\)** & **Transverse** & **H\({}_{650}\)** \\ \hline \(\rm l_{C1}\) & 18 & 16.8 & 15.6 & 14.4 & 13.2 & \(\alpha_{\rm C1}\) & 10 & \(\beta_{\rm C1}\) & \(-\)26 & \(\gamma_{\rm C1}\) & 15 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{C2}\) & 18.75 & 17.5 & 16.25 & 15 & 13.75 & \(\alpha_{\rm C2}\) & 15 & \(\beta_{\rm C2}\) & \(-\)23 & \(\gamma_{\rm C2}\) & 12 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{C3}\) & 19.5 & 18.2 & 16.9 & 15.6 & 14.3 & \(\alpha_{\rm C3}\) & 20 & \(\beta_{\rm C3}\) & \(-\)20 & \(\gamma_{\rm C3}\) & 9 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{C4}\) & 20.25 & 18.9 & 17.55 & 16.2 & 14.85 & \(\alpha_{\rm C4}\) & 25 & \(\beta_{\rm C4}\) & \(-\)17 & \(\gamma_{\rm C4}\) & 6 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{C5}\) & 20.25 & 18.9 & 17.55 & 16.2 & 14.85 & \(\alpha_{\rm C5}\) & 28 & \(\beta_{\rm C5}\) & \(-\)14 & \(\gamma_{\rm C5}\) & 3 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{C6}\) & 19.5 & 18.2 & 16.9 & 15.6 & 14.3 & \(\alpha_{\rm C6}\) & 30 & \(\beta_{\rm C6}\) & \(-\)11 & \(\gamma_{\rm C6}\) & 0 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{C7}\) & 23.25 & 21.7 & 20.15 & 18.6 & 17.05 & \(\alpha_{\rm C7}\) & 36 & \(\beta_{\rm C7}\) & \(-\)8 & \(\gamma_{\rm C7}\) & \(-\)3 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D1}\) & 25.5 & 23.8 & 22.,1 & 20.4 & 18.7 & \(\alpha_{\rm D1}\) & 33 & \(\beta_{\rm D1}\) & \(-\)6 & \(\gamma_{\rm D1}\) & \(-\)6 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D2}\) & 27.75 & 25.9 & 24.05 & 22.2 & 20.35 & \(\alpha_{\rm D2}\) & 27 & \(\beta_{\rm D2}\) & \(-\)3 & \(\gamma_{\rm D2}\) & \(-\)9 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D3}\) & 27.75 & 25.9 & 24.05 & 22.2 & 20.35 & \(\alpha_{\rm D3}\) & 17 & \(\beta_{\rm D3}\) & 0 & \(\gamma_{\rm D3}\) & \(-\)12 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D4}\) & 29.25 & 27.3 & 25.35 & 23.4 & 21.45 & \(\alpha_{\rm D4}\) & 14 & \(\beta_{\rm D4}\) & 3 & \(\gamma_{\rm D4}\) & \(-\)15 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D5}\) & 29.25 & 27.3 & 25.35 & 23.4 & 21.45 & \(\alpha_{\rm D5}\) & 8 & \(\beta_{\rm D5}\) & 6 & \(\gamma_{\rm D5}\) & \(-\)18 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D6}\) & 31.5 & 29.4 & 27.3 & 25.2 & 23.1 & \(\alpha_{\rm D6}\) & 1 & \(\beta_{\rm D6}\) & 9 & \(\gamma_{\rm D6}\) & \(-\)21 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D7}\) & 32.25 & 30.1 & 27.95 & 25.8 & 23.65 & \(\alpha_{\rm D7}\) & \(-\)10 & \(\beta_{\rm D7}\) & 12 & \(\gamma_{\rm D7}\) & \(-\)24 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D8}\) & 33.75 & 31.5 & 29.25 & 27 & 24.75 & \(\alpha_{\rm D8}\) & \(-\)13 & \(\beta_{\rm D8}\) & 15 & \(\gamma_{\rm D8}\) & \(-\)27 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D9}\) & 34.5 & 32.2 & 29.9 & 27.6 & 25.3 & \(\alpha_{\rm D9}\) & \(-\)14 & \(\beta_{\rm D9}\) & 18 & \(\gamma_{\rm D9}\) & \(-\)24 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D10}\) & 36 & 33.6 & 31.2 & 28.8 & 26.4 & \(\alpha_{\rm D10}\) & \(-\)15 & \(\beta_{\rm D10}\) & 21 & \(\gamma_{\rm D10}\) & \(-\)21 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D11}\) & 38.25 & 35.7 & 33.15 & 30.6 & 28.05 & \(\alpha_{\rm D11}\) & \(-\)16 & \(\beta_{\rm D11}\) & 18 & \(\gamma_{\rm D11}\) & \(-\)18 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{D12}\) & 40.5 & 37.8 & 35.1 & 32.4 & 29.7 & \(\alpha_{\rm D12}\) & \(-\)18 & \(\beta_{\rm D12}\) & 15 & \(\gamma_{\rm D12}\) & \(-\)15 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{L1}\) & 42.75 & 39.9 & 37.05 & 34.2 & 31.35 & \(\alpha_{\rm L1}\) & \(-\)15 & \(\beta_{\rm L1}\) & 12 & \(\gamma_{\rm L1}\) & \(-\)12 \\ \hline \(\rm l_{L2}\) & 43.5 & 40.6 & 37.7 & 34.8 & 31.9 & \(\alpha_{\rm L2}\) & \(-\)11 & \(\beta_{\rm L2}\the significant hollow. Figure 12 shows the values obtained for a particular patient using the EOS images and the integrations of the model spine in the patient's body. Figure 12: EOS images of patient (**a**) side and (**d**) front view, and spine integrated into the patient’s body (**b**) side and (**c**) front.