## 6 Illustrative Policy Analysis
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Scenario 1: Improving the Total Access and Epress Travel Time**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Scenario 2: Improving the Usability of Footpaths**} \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{**Station No.**} & **Combined** & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Level Based on \\ Consideration \\ Consideration \\ Consideration \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Consideration \\ for 10\% \\ Reduction in \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Consideration \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Daily Footall \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Consideration \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Consideration \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Daily Footall \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Consideration \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Daily Footall \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Consideration \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} \% Change in \\ Daily Footall \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} \% Devioffall \\ \end{tabular} \\  & **Consideration** & **Coincidence** & **for 10\%** & **for 25\%** & **for 10\%** & **for 10\%** & **for 25\%** & **for 10\%** & **for 25\%** \\  & **and Ridership** & **Reduction in** & **Reduction in** & **Reduction in** & **Reduction in** & **In** & **Improvement** & **Improvement** & **Improvement** \\  & **OVTT** & **OVTT** & **OVTT** & **OVTT** & **in Footpath** & **in Footpath** & **in Footpath** \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{_Line I_} & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
1 & LC, LR & 1.09\% & 2.42\% & 1.84\% & 4.10\% & 0.25\% & 0.62\% & 0.11\% & 0.19\% \\
2 & MC, LR & **1.57\%** & **3.80\%** & **3.08\%** & **6.79\%** & 0.25\% & 0.63\% & 0.12\% & 0.21\% \\
3 & MC, LR & 1.13\% & 2.51\% & 1.95\% & 4.32\% & 0.23\% & 0.58\% & 0.11\% & 0.18\% \\
4 & HC, LR & 0.54\% & 1.19\% & 1.62\% & 3.59\% & 0.25\% & 0.63\% & 0.23\% & 0.39\% \\
5 & HC, LR & **1.02\%** & **2.13\%** & **3.59\%** & **7.98\%** & 0.11\% & 0.27\% & 0.08\% & 0.14\% \\
6 & HC, LR & 0.57\% & 1.26\% & 1.70\% & 3.76\% & 0.11\% & 0.28\% & 0.10\% & 0.17\% \\
7 & LC, MR & 1.19\% & 2.62\% & 1.27\% & 2.82\% & 0.27\% & 0.07\% & 0.10\% & 0.16\% \\
8 & LC, MR & 1.22\% & 2.69\% & 1.63\% & 3.61\% & 0.18\% & 0.46\% & 0.07\% & 0.11\% \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{_Line II_} & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline
9 & MC, LR & 1.14\% & 2.51\% & 2.12\% & 4.72\% & 0.08\% & 0.19\% & 6.31\% & 10.78\% \\
10 & MC, LR & 1.07\% & 2.37\% & 1.83\% & 4.07\% & 0.08\% & 0.21\% & 7.99\% & 13.75\% \\
11 & MC, LR & 0.66\% & 1.45\% & 1.21\% & 2.68\% & 0.14\% & 0.36\% & 6.01\% & 10.25\% \\
12 & MC, LR & 0.90\% & 1.99\% & 1.63\% & 3.62\% & 0.28\% & 0.09\% & 5.50\% & 9.37\% \\
13 & MC, LR & 0.92\% & 2.03\% & 1.51\% & 3.35\% & 0.29\% & 0.71\% & 8.12\% & 13.98\% \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Total across above stations**} & **1.00\%** & **2.21\%** & **1.92\%** & **4.26\%** & **0.22\%** & **0.54\%** & **2.04\%** & **5.25\%** \\
**Total across all metro stations** & **1.04\%** & **2.29\%** & **1.72\%** & **3.81\%** & **0.19\%** & **0.48\%** & **2.50\%** & **6.42\%** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Effect of improvement in total access and egress travel time (OVTT) and usability of footpath. On the other hand, footpath improvement has a significant impact only on footfall but less so on consideration. This analysis demonstrates that the proposed policies have varying impacts on consideration, which is an indicator of the potential demand, and ridership, which is a measure of the realized demand. Station 2 shows a large improvement in consideration due to OVTT improvement, whereas Station 5 has a significant footfall increase under the same scenario. On the other hand, footpath improvement only has a significant influence on line 2 footfall. Thus, the effects of different policies vary across dimensions as well as locations.