# Research on the Evacuation Characteristics of Cruise Ship Passengers in Multi-Scenarios
## 4 Discussion of Simulation Results
### The Analysis of the First 10% and Last 10% of Arriving Passengers
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{3}{*}{**Decks**} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**First 10\% of Arriving Passengers**} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Last 10\% of Arriving Passengers**} \\ \cline{2-10}  & \begin{tabular}{c} **Day-** \\ **Individual** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Day-** \\ **Group** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Night-** \\ **Individual** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Night-** \\ **Group** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Day-** \\ **Individual** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Day-** \\ **Group** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Night-** \\ **Individual** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Night-** \\ **Group** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Deck1 & 38.29\% & 36.81\% & 4.18\% & 3.91\% & 2.13\% & 5.01\% & - & - \\ Deck2 & 61.70\% & 63.18\% & - & - & 1.50\% & 0.73\% & - & - \\ Deck3 & - & - & 38.33\% & 37.04\% & - & - & 10.11\% & 7.25\% \\ Deck4 & - & - & 35.80\% & 35.87\% & - & - & 19.48\% & 17.14\% \\ Deck5 & - & - & 15.22\% & 16.33\% & - & - & 24.70\% & 25.77\% \\ Deck6 & - & - & 6.46\% & 6.86\% & - & - & 25.46\% & 27.92\% \\ Deck7 & - & - & - & - & 35.06\% & 29.06\% & 6.47\% & 6.67\% \\ Deck8 & - & - & - & - & 34.48\% & 36.32\% & 13.79\% & 15.24\% \\ Deck9 & - & - & - & - & 22.32\% & 24.05\% & - & - \\ Deck10 & - & - & - & - & 4.51\% & 4.81\% & - & - \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Proportions of passengers on different decks. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c} **Night-** \\ **Group** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
1 & 11.41\% & 13.22\% & 11.06\% & 9.28\% & 10.58\% & 10.13\% & 18.46\% & 19.39\% \\
2 & 27.23\% & 27.17\% & 20.15\% & 20.68\% & 15.86\% & 14.69\% & 5.80\% & 6.79\% \\
3 & 32.73\% & 29.64\% & 23.45\% & 27.01\% & 31.27\% & 24.14\% & 4.60\% & 3.84\% \\
4 & 19.75\% & 21.11\% & 28.69\% & 27.40\% & 8.78\% & 13.82\% & 8.82\% & 11.39\% \\
5 & 8.89\% & 8.87\% & 16.65\% & 15.63\% & 33.50\% & 37.22\% & 62.32\% & 58.59\% \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Proportions of passengers in different MVZs. type 3 and 8 passengers are not the fastest, the number of these two types of passengers is the largest. The number of these two types of passengers is twice the number of types 1, 2, 6, and 7, and so the proportion value of these two types of passengers is highest in the three scenarios. In female and male passengers, the walking speed of type 1 and 6 passengers is the fastest, respectively. The proportions of these two types of passengers are larger in individual scenarios than in group scenarios. On the contrary, regarding type 4, 5, 9, and 10 passengers, whose walking speeds are slower, the proportions of these passengers were higher in the group scenario than in the corresponding individual scenario. It can be found that in the individual scenario, passengers who move faster have an advantage in the evacuation. However, in the group scenario, this advantage is diminished due to the group behavior of passengers. For the last 10% of arriving passengers, it appears that the slower the walking speed, the greater the proportion of passengers, and the proportion of female passengers is larger than that of male passengers. In day or night scenarios, the proportion of individual passengers with faster walking speeds is smaller than group passengers, and the situation is quite the reverse for type 4, 5, and 10 passengers with slower speeds. It can be seen that in the group scenario, the evacuation efficiency of passengers with slower walking speeds can be improved, but for passengers with a faster walking speed, the evacuation efficiency is reduced. This is consistent with the characteristics of the first 10% of arriving passengers. It can also be seen from Table 6 that although the walking speed of passengers in types 4, 5, 9, and 10 is slow, some of them are still in the first 10% of arriving passengers. From Table 4, it is found that, in the night scenario, some passengers on the higher deck can also be within the first 10% of arriving passengers.