## 6 Conclusions  
For assessing structural earthquake damage, developments in civil and earthquake engineering technologies require continuous updating of seismic design codes and seismic hazard maps. Both the codes and the seismic hazard maps were updated in 2018 in Turkey. In this study, some innovations were examined in detail within the scope of the last two codes, and comparisons were made. The Eastern Anatolian Region, which includes 14 provinces, is an excellent example due to its characteristics, such as its high seismicity, especially with the latest signficant earthquakes (2011 Van and 2020 Elazg (Sivvice)). The region also experienced the 1939 Erzincan earthquake, which is the largest recorded earthquake in Turkey. In this respect, this region is in a position worth examining in terms of seismicity. It is well known that the seismic activity in Eastern Anatolia (Turkey) is very high. Both the historical and instrumental period earthquake presence listed here also show the high activity. Thus, it is of a great importance to perform seismic hazard estimation for the region. The findings showed that the highest Mo distribution was concentrated between the Van and Hakkari provinces. The fact that the recurrence periods of large earthquakes were proportional to the energy they accumulate can be explained by the high released  
Figure 15: Comparison of limit states. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Earthquake Ground** & **Base Shear** & **Displacement** & **K\_elas** & **K-eff** & **DL** & **SD** & **NC** \\ \cline{2-8}
**Motion Level** & **(kN)** & **(m)** & **(kN)/m** & **(kN/m)** & **(m)** & **(m)** & **(m)** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{DD-1} & \multirow{2}{*}{9197.2} & 0.1194 & \multirow{2}{*}{162,100.6} & \multirow{2}{*}{77,045.55} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.518} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.664} & \multirow{2}{*}{1.152} \\  & & 1.152 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{DD-2} & \multirow{2}{*}{9193.25} & 0.119 & \multirow{2}{*}{162,100.6} & \multirow{2}{*}{77,224.23} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.298} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.382} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.662} \\  & & 0.6624 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{DD-3} & \multirow{2}{*}{9183.68} & 0.1191 & \multirow{2}{*}{162,100.6} & \multirow{2}{*}{77,325.8} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.125} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.161} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.278} \\  & & 0.2519 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{DD-4} & \multirow{2}{*}{9174.91} & 0.1187 & \multirow{2}{*}{162,100.6} & \multirow{2}{*}{77,078.87} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.082} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.104} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.181} \\  & & 0.2554 & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{DD-5} & \multirow{2}{*}{9174.91} & 0.1187 & \multirow{2}{*}{162,100.6} & \multirow{2}{*}{77,078.87} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.082} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.104} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.181} \\  & & 0.4221 & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 12: Comparison of values obtained in the X direction for the sample building model for Bingöl. energy. Seismic hazard analyses were carried out using the updated earthquake hazard map of Turkey considering all the provincial centers in the Eastern Anatolian Region. The PGA and PGV values calculated for different probabilities of exceedance showed that the Bingol province had the highest earthquake generation potential, while the Kars province had the lowest potential. In the 2007 seismic code, in order to show the earthquake-prone areas, the country was divided into subregions. The provinces of Bingol, Bitlis, Erzincan, Hakkari, Malatya, and Mus were classed as the first-degree earthquake hazardous region, which had the highest risk in terms of earthquake occurrence, while the other provinces were classified as the second-degree region. The most effective ground acceleration coefficient for the first-degree region was 0.40 g, while it was 0.30 g for the second-degree region. However, higher values were obtained via the updated code.