## 4 Comparative Analysis Using the Framework for Mainstreaming  
The results from applying the framework to the case study analysis are presented in Table 1. The analysis sets out commonalities and disparities between both cases, WGV and the Green Swing. The following aspects and elements of the projects have been compared: project's size, time of design and construction, scope and scale, actors involved, drivers that motivated actions, available budgets, strategies and processes used, constraints, and values. Through this comparative analysis, the authors attempt to see if the regeneration of old modernist sums into regenerative biophilic urban assets can contribute to creating sustainable communities and inform policies for replication in other locations looking for healthy communities and ecosystems to thrive together. Both cases were created and constructed in the same decade of the 2010s. But they differ in scale and scope; while the Green Swing involves four residential units, besides the sump garden, the WGV is a residential precinct development that comprises more than 80 units, amenities, and green open space. Due to the differences in scale and scope, they present a diversity of actors involved. The Green Swing vision was conceived by a small group of citizen developers, who attracted others with a similar mindset and interests. The WGV vision originated from conversations among the local government, state agencies, and local community about the need to innovate residential precincts' design [43]. This suggests that small to medium local biophilic regeneration projects can be initiated and led by community members and may only require minor input from professional consultants if technological involvements are not requested. Both cases have been designed and  
Figure 8: The sump garden is used for a range of urban agriculture activities, including bee keeping. Credit: [PERSON]. developed as innovative responses to sustainable urban living expectations, boosted by social, environmental, and economic drivers. It is interesting to note that many social and environmental drivers overlap. The drivers highlighted by the stakeholders of the Green Swing sum garden focus mainly on social and environmental benefits, for example, inspiring the local community to engage in the process of enhancing the urban landscape, as well as building connections between the individuals (members of the community). The sum garden provided a place for collaboration, such as food production and enjoyment of the natural space, helping to build community. For the stakeholders of the WGV sum park project, one of the main objectives was demonstrating how to effectively utilize space in a medium-density development to deliver ecological, social, and economic benefits. Hence, the sum park was highly dependent on local government and state agencies for financial support, as well as engineering and environmental technical advice and development. The sum park focus was directed towards mitigation of canopy loss and biodiversity enhancement. For all the stakeholders, the environmental issues were crucial to address. Strategies used responded to the objectives and scale of each project. The Green Swing sum garden was a small-scale project supported by a simple and clear strategy that regarded the sum biophilic regeneration as an opportunity to increase urban green space and gain additional productive and recreational space for community building while inspiring other communities to do the same. It proceeded because the local authorities could support it without needing to increase its budget to accommodate its management. The involvement of a local gardening group was a critical step in this process. The WGV sum park was a more complex and larger-scale project that needed a stronger professional strategy. A public-private partnership was then developed that created an \"Innovation through Demonstration\" model and utilized the One Planet Living sustainability framework and the guidelines of water-sensitive urban design to steer their actions.