## 4 Discussion
These changes were quantitatively interpreted after the measurement results were approximated by an equation describing the imaginary component of the permittivity of the water surrounding the protein [22]. Thus, at the physical level, the ability of HD samples to have a distant effect was also shown; however, the detailed mechanism of this effect needs to be defined in future studies. The physical (quantum) nature of the distant interaction of samples is clearly shown in Figure 5, where placing donor and acceptor samples side by side (columns 3 and 4) leads to an approximately twofold increase in the chemiluminescence intensity compared to similar samples separated from each other (columns 1 and 2). Moreover, it should be noted that there is not much difference in the magnitude of the effect between the pair of the samples either completely wrapped (columns 5 and 6) or not wrapped in aluminum foil (columns 3 and 4). In the absence of foil (columns 3 and 4, Figure 5), the effect is much more pronounced (equally for the donor and acceptor), and when the cuvettes are wrapped in foil on all sides except the contact side of the cuvettes, the effect is much less pronounced and manifests itself differently for the donor and the acceptor (columns 7 and 8). To explain this effect, it can be assumed that aluminum foil shields the electrical component of electromagnetic radiation in the radio frequency range, in contrast to permalloy (the outer shield of the device used in the experiments), which is a magnetic shield mainly for SMF and low-frequency AMF. In this regard, it can be assumed that the result obtained by us in experiments with shielding (changes in the distant effect when foil was partially wrapped around each cuvette) indicates the need for the presence of not only CMF with optimal parameters for implementing the distant effect, but also possibly the simultaneous presence of the electrical component of the electromagnetic field (EMF). Seemingly, in addition to the magnetic field, we discovered another factor that controls the distant interactions--EMF. This hypothesis also explains the differences in the relative values in pairs of samples 3 and 4, as well as 7 and 8 (Figure 5), where partial shielding with aluminum foil, in all likelihood, can to a certain extent shield the external electromagnetic effect on the samples. This is, no doubt, an important result that requires a special detailed study in the future. Thus, the results obtained in this work about the features of physical interactions between donor and acceptor samples are consistent with the results of a number of studies [3,4]. For example in [4], the characteristics of vanishing voltage fluctuations on condenser plates filled with water were measured at impulse excitation of the contour. Preliminary cell exposure for several minutes to a microwave radiation field at 36 GHz inhibited a 47 Hz peak, and such a water state was retained after switching off the microwave field for dozens of minutes or hours, depending on the radiation power [4]. Another study demonstrated that the aqueous solution remembers the effect of microwave radiation (42 GHz). In these experiments the effect manifested itself in a change in the opening frequency of Ca(\({}^{2+}\))-dependent K\({}^{+}\) channels in the presence of water after radio exposure [3]. Thus, it has been shown that not only the electromagnetic but also the magnetic component has its own biophysical effect. In our studies [23, 24, 25], reproduced by other laboratories [26, 27, 28, 29], it was shown that the effect of a weak CMF on aqueous solutions of amino acids (ionic current reaction) directly depends on the presence and direction of the electric field (in this case, set by the inter-electrode potential difference). This potential difference determines the energy transfer and its direction in the physical and chemical system under study.