## 5 Conclusions  
In this study, we carried out an assessment of the quality and readability of OHI on high BP, a common disease known to everyone and its treatment is not as complex as that of diseases such as Recurrent Respiratory papillomavirus, maxillofacialtrauma, diverticulitis and Endoscopic retrograde cholangiocarcinomareatography (ERCP). The study considers two different groups for evaluation and each group consists of 5 evaluators. It was found from the analysis that the quality of OHI on high BP is moderate. To ensure internal consistency of the DISCERN questionnaire, the coefficient of reliability is computed. The overall average DISCERN score of all studied websites is 48.1 (60.1%) which is below the norm for a disease such as hypertension. The quality of three websites (Table A3: S.No. 23-25) is very poor and five websites have high quality of information on hypertension. Similarly, one thing is common in the assessment of both groups--that the top ten websites in each group are the same but they have been marked differently (see Table A3: S.No. 1-10). Overall the quality of 11 out of 25 (44%) websites varies from good to excellent. Both groups concluded that references and supplementary sources are not mentioned by most of the websites. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c} \hline \hline
**Category** & _No. of Websites_ & _FRES_ & _AGL_ & _p-Value at p < 0.05_ \\ \hline Government & 6 & 64.4 \(\pm\) 8.2 & 7.6 \(\pm\) 1.3 & 0.908034 \\ Information & 9 & 48.7\(\pm\) 10.8 & 10.5 \(\pm\) 1.9 & 0.040863 \\ Institution & 4 & 60.8 \(\pm\) 6.3 & 8.5 \(\pm\) 1.4 & 0.60426 \\ Non-Profit & 6 & 65.8 \(\pm\) 5.7 & 7.8 \(\pm\) 1.3 & 0.483292 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Average Readability score of all categories of websites. Moreover, 11 out of 25 websites do not meet the recommended score of readability. Among these 11 websites, 6 achieved an excellent DISCERN score but their readability score is less than 50 which is difficult for a college student to understand properly. Hence, in order to make it more productive, there is a dire need to improve the readability level of the assessed websites. It was also observed that the websites with a high visibility rate (appeared on 4 th and 5 th hit of search engine) do not necessarily have good quality of health information compared to subsequent websites. Conceptualization, M.T. ; Data curation, M.U. ; Formal analysis, M.T., F.M. and I.K. ; Investigation, I.K. and F.M. ; Methodology, M.T., M.U., S.u.R. ; Project administration, M.U., F.M. and A.G.; Resources, M.U. and I.K. ; Software, M.T. and M.U. ; Supervision, M.U. and F.M; Validation, F.M., M.I. ([PERSON]), M.I. ([PERSON]) and S.u.R. ; Visualization, S.u.R., M.I. ([PERSON]) ([PERSON]); Writing - original draft, M.T. and M.I. ([PERSON]); Writing - review & editing, M.U., M.I. ([PERSON]), F.M. and A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. For this study: there was no funding. Thanks to [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] for their assessment about the research work. Special appreciation of [PERSON] Assistant Professor at Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar and [PERSON] Assistant Professor at Hayat Abad Medical Complex Peshawar for their valuable inputs during the evaluation process of this work. All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. **Section 1: Reliability of Publication**  
Q1: Are the aims clear? Q2: Does it achieve its aims? Q3: Is it relevant? Q4: Is it clear what sources of information were used to compile the publication (other than the author or producer)? Q5: Is it clear when the information used to reported in the publication was produced? Q6: Is it balanced and unbiased? Q7: Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information? Q8: Does it refer to areas of uncertainty? Rating: No: give 1 point Partially: give 2, 3 or 4 points Yes: give 5 points  
**Section 2: Quality of information on treatment choices**  
Q9: Does it describe how each treatment works? Q10: Does it describe the benefits of each treatment?