## 3 Results  
The Spearman correlation analysis revealed that no significant relationship was observed between subjectively and objectively measured levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in both occupational and non-occupational contexts. Specifically, for occupational, physical activity, the Spearman correlation coefficient (RS) was found to be 0.11 (\(p=0.321\)) in a sample of 78 participants. Similarly, for non-occupational physical activity, the RS value was \(-0.11\) (\(p=0.254\)) in a sample of 111 participants (Table 2). These results suggest a weak positive relationship between subjective and objective measures of occupational PA and a weak negative relationship for non-occupational PA. However, neither correlation was statistically significant.  
Regarding the measured recommended physical activity, which encompasses total MVPA, no significant correlation was observed with the health personnel's self-assessment. It is worth noting, however, that a weak positive correlation was identified between light physical activity and total physical activity. This weak positive correlation can be attributed to the dominance of low-intensity activities within the participants' total weekly physical activity.  
The statistical analysis of our study, using a [PERSON] signed rank test, revealed a significant difference between objectively measured physical activity and the self-reported physical activity levels declared by the participants within the same week. This significant difference was observed regardless of the type and intensity of physical activity performed (Table 3).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Physical Activity (PA)** & & **N** & **RS** & \(p\) \\ \hline Occupational PA & LPA & 153 & 0.22 & **0.006** \\ (min/week) & MVPA & 80 & 0.11 & 0.321 \\  & Total & 153 & 0.23 & **0.004** \\ \hline Non-occupational PA & LPA & 108 & 0.20 & **0.044** \\ (min/week) & MVPA & 113 & \(-0.11\) & 0.254 \\  & Total & 146 & 0.25 & **0.002** \\ \hline Total PA & & & & \\ (min/week) & MVPA & 144 & \(-0.02\) & 0.774 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} PA—physical activity, LPA—low physical activity, MVPA—moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, RS—Spearman coefficient.  
\end{table}
Table 2: The relationship between subjectively and objectively measured physical activity.  
The effect size was calculated using the Wilcoxon effect size (Rc). In the case of occupational PA, the Rc was \(-0.61\), indicating a large effect size. Similarly, for total PA, the Rc was also \(-0.61\), signifying a large effect size. These large effect sizes suggest a considerable discrepancy between self-reported and objectively measured PA levels, emphasizing the importance of utilizing objective measurement tools for accurate PA assessment in healthcare professionals.  
In terms of overall physical activity levels, the average recommended amount of physical activity based on accelerometer measurements was found to be 158 min per week for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). However, participants self-reported a significantly higher weekly MVPA of 271 min (Table 3). This disparity highlights the tendency for individuals to overestimate their level of physical activity when relying on self-reporting methods.  
The statistical analysis conducted using the chi-squared test revealed that the association between meeting physical activity recommendations, as assessed through subjective and objective measurements, did not reach statistical significance (Figure 1). This implies that there is no compelling evidence to support a significant relationship between the two assessment methods in terms of determining whether individuals meet the recommended levels of physical activity.