## 1 Introduction  
The relationship between language and cognition has always been a focus of linguists. In human cognitive concepts, the event types represented by verbs hold significant importance for our understanding of the world, as this classification essentially shapes the foundational patterns of concept formation and integration in humans. Moreover, the classification of verbs by humans can reflect our cognition of embodied experiences in the real world. From the perspective of Chinese language research, the study and prediction of event types are of great significance, primarily in two aspects. On one hand, the collocational patterns in Chinese primarily revolve around verbs, exploring the relationships between verbs and other components. Whether at the syntactic level involving subjects and objects, or in the dominance relationships among semantic roles, both are influenced by the verb event types. Additionally, aspectual auxiliaries constitute an important category of function words in Chinese, and event types provide crucial hints for the collocational relationships between verbs and aspectual auxiliaries. Although their focuses differ: event types concentrate on the temporal structure formed by verbs and their arguments, while aspectual auxiliaries focus on various facets of the event process, offering different observation perspectives on events, the interaction between the two is indeed a key point in studying their collocational relationships. On the other hand, the fundamental classification of verbs is of significant importance for linguistic research. The study of Chinese verbs has long been a hot topic, with linguists employing various classification methods based on their research objectives. For instance, [PERSON] [1] posited that the grammatical functions of verbs are not entirely consistent and can be categorized into different subcategories based on distinct criteria, including transitive verbs, intransitive verbs, nominal-object verbs, verbal-object verbs, nominal verbs and auxiliary verbs. Some scholars, such as [PERSON] [2], classified verbs from the perspective of grammatical functions and semantic features. He divided verbs into four categories based on the relationship between verbs and the dynamic auxiliary word \"GUO\", including repetitive verbs, static verbs, non-repeatable verbs and verbs with judgment and evaluation properties. Regardless of the method employed, these classifications essentially pertain to the categorization of event types, with the ultimate aim of clarifying the collocational patterns between verbs and other sentence constituents, which has important implications for both linguistic research and teaching. However, there are exceptions; for example, the SUMO (Suggested Upper Merged Ontology) [3] ontology classification system does not differentiate vocabulary based on parts of speech but instead focuses on constructing a universal knowledge system for humanity. Nevertheless, the foundational conceptual system of SUMO still comprises concepts such as state and activity. Therefore, a comprehensive and thorough study of verb event types has become an almost unavoidable task. From an applied perspective, the collocational patterns between words are significantly influenced by the event types. The event types of predicates, particularly verbs, form the foundation for studying the rules of the Chinese language and represent a crucial node in both learning and teaching Chinese. The use of aspectual markers is a key focus and challenge in Chinese language instruction. With a clear understanding of event types, students can more easily grasp the collocational patterns between words, verbs and aspectual markers. Event type refers to the classification of a verb based on the event structure it exhibits across the temporal phase, often referred to as situation type. Verbs and aspectual markers exhibit different co-occurrence patterns, leading to distinctions in event types.