## 3 Results
### Correlation Analysis  
Table 1 presents the correlation analysis among the outgoing foraging activities, pollen-gathering foraging activities and weather factors such as temperature (Temp. ), relative humidity (RH) and wind speed (WS) observations. Temperature has a significant negative correlation with RH (\(-\)7.993) and a significant positive correlation with the WS (0.5412). RH shows a significant negative correlation (\(-\)0.3786) with the WS. Temperature is significantly correlated with the outgoing and pollen-gathering foraging activities of _AMJ_ (0.0760 and \(-\)0.1307, respectively) and _AMC_ (\(-\)0.0793 and \(-\)0.1665, respectively). The two foraging activities (outgoing and pollen-gathering activities) of each bee subspecies were significantly positively correlated (0.5120 and 0.5039 for _AMC_ and _AMJ_, respectively) with each other. Subsequently, the overall means calculated for the two subspecies also revealed a significant positive correlation (0.523) between these foraging activities. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Subspecies**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Foraging Activity**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Correlation Coefficient (r) and Significance**} \\ \cline{3-5}  & & **Temp. 1** ** & **RH 2** ** & **WS 3** ** & **Outgoing** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{_AMC_} & Outgoing & \(-\)0.0793 ** & 0.1105 ** & 0.1032 ** & - \\  & Pollen-gathering & \(-\)0.1665 ** & 0.1661 ** & \(-\)0.0442 & 0.5120 ** \\  & Outgoing & 0.0760 ** & \(-\)0.0662 & 0.0748 ** & - \\  & Pollen-gathering & \(-\)0.1307 ** & 0.1303 ** & \(-\)0.0629 & 0.5039 ** \\  & Temp. 1  & \(-\)7.993 ** & 0.5412 ** & \\ Weather factors & RH 2  & \(-\)7.993 ** & \(-\)0.3786 ** & \\  & WS 3  & 0.5412 ** & \(-\)0.3786 ** & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Pearson correlation coefficients among weather factors (temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed) and foraging activities (outgoing foraging and pollen gathering activities) of _AMJ_ and _AMC_. The general means of the two subspecies revealed a positive significant correlation (0.523) between outgoing foraging and pollen-gathering activities. The asterisks indicate significant correlations (\"_p_ \(<\) 0.05, \"\"_p_ \(<\) 0.01, \"\"_p_ \(<\) 0.001). 1 ** & Temperature; 2 relative humidity; 3 ** \\ \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{_AMJ_} & Outgoing & \(-\)0.0793 ** & 0.1105 ** & 0.1032 ** & - \\  & Pollen-gathering & \(-\)0.1665 ** & 0.1661 ** & \(-\)0.0442 & 0.5120 ** \\  & Outgoing & 0.0760 ** & \(-\)0.0662 & 0.0748 ** & - \\  & Pollen-gathering & \(-\)0.1307 ** & 0.1303 ** & \(-\)0.0629 & 0.5039 ** \\  & Temp. 1  & \(-\)7.993 ** & 0.5412 ** & \\ Weather factors & RH 2  & \(-\)7.993 ** & & \(-\)0.3786 ** & \\  & WS 3  & 0.5412 ** & \(-\)0.3786 ** & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 1: Pearson correlation coefficients among weather factors (temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed) and foraging activities (outgoing foraging and pollen gathering activities) of _AMJ_ and _AMC_. The general means of the two subspecies revealed a positive significant correlation (0.523) between outgoing foraging and pollen-gathering activities. The asterisks indicate significant correlations (\"_p_ \(<\) 0.05, \"\"_p_ \(<\) 0.01, \"\"_p_ \(<\) 0.001). 1 ** & Temperature; 3 relative humidity; 4 ** Wind speed. Figure 6: Comparison between the foraging activities (cumulative means for the two combined flowering seasons) of the two studied honey bee subspecies (_AMJ_ and _AMC_) and the cumulative foraging activities of the subspecies combined during the two flowering seasons of _Z. mummula_. (**A**) Foraging activities (mean \(\pm\) SEM) of _AMJ_ and _AMC_, regardless of season. (**B**) Seasonal comparison of foraging activities (mean \(\pm\) SEM) during the two flowering seasons (season I and season II) of _Z. mummula_ regardless of subspecies. SEM: standard error of the mean. Flowering season I lasted from June-July, and flowering season II lasted from August-October.