## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Parameters** & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Baseline**} & **R2** & **R4** & **R6** & **R8** & **F** & \(p\) & \(\eta^{2}\) \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{\begin{tabular}{c} Sway \\ velocity--AP \\ (m/s) \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{3}{*}{DL} & 57.51 & 49.40 \({}^{\text{b}}\) & 52.31 & 48.37 \({}^{\text{a}}\) & 51.08 & 2.882 & 0.027 & 0.111 \\  & & (12.95) & (15.19) & (17.21) & (11.95) & (13.32) & 2.882 & 0.027 & 0.111 \\  & & 49.45 & 48.20 & 48.70 & 43.69 & 49.05 & & \\  & & (13.98) & (13.42) & (16.28) & (9.10) & (13.84) & 1.404 & 0.254 & 0.058 \\  & & 55.55 & 55.32 & 55.23 & 50.55 & 53.96 & & \\  & & (18.51) & (20.63) & (25.74) & (11.16) & (19.48) & & \\  & & 55.06 & 52.15 & 45.95 & 43.90 \({}^{\text{c}}\) & 48.60 & & \\  & & (15.79) & (17.37) & (13.45) & (7.35) & (14.69) & 3.830 & 0.020 & 0.143 \\ \multirow{3}{*}{\
\begin{tabular}{c} Sway area--AP \\ (mm*s) \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{3}{*}{DL} & 91.87 & 93.46 & 84.08 & 81.57 & 92.36 & & \\  & & (19.94) & (25.63) & (24.06) & (11.29) & (31.05) & & \\  & & 126.55 & 88.05 & 76.26 & 72.48 \({}^{\text{d}}\) & 80.17 & & \\  & & (82.93) & (20.26) & (16.71) & (11.06) & (25.01) & & \\  & & 116.76 & 106.14 & 102.48 & 92.58 \({}^{\text{e}}\) & 100.90 & & \\  & & (34.03) & (30.16) & (32.50) & (19.85) & (29.75) & & \\  & & 111.39 & 108.89 & 84.63 \({}^{\text{g}}\) & 80.90 \({}^{\text{l}}\) & 108.42 & & \\  & & (33.80) & (34.68) & (24.60) & (10.69) & (27.63) & 12.707 & \textless{}0.001 & 0.356 \\ \multirow{3}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} Ellipse area \%100 \\ (mm\({}^{2}\)) \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{3}{*}{DL} & 47.19 & 47.19 & 47.19 & 47.19 & 47.19 & & & \\  & & (224.12) & (264.13) & (306.12) & (149.02) & (233.39) & & \\  & & 465.05 & 452.55 & 340.30 \({}^{\text{i}}\) & 311.69 \({}^{\text{h}}\) & 407.58 & & \\  & & (160.26) & (170.78) & (137.32) & (75.00) & (207.51) & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
Notes. Data are reported as mean (standard deviation). AP = anteroposterior; ML = mediolateral; DL = dominant leg; NDL = non-dominant leg; R2 = 2 min recovery; R4 = 4 min recovery; R6 = 6 min recovery; R8 = 8 min recovery.  
\({}^{\text{a}}\) Significantly different from baseline; \({}^{\text{b}}\) significantly different from baseline; \({}^{\text{c}}\) significantly different from baseline; \({}^{\text{d}}\) significantly different from baseline; \({}^{\text{d}}\) significantly different from baseline; \({}^{\text{d}}\) significantly different from baseline; \({}^{\text{e}}\) significantly different from baseline; R2, and R8; \({}^{\text{h}}\) significantly different from baseline; R2, and R8; \({}^{\text{h}}\) significantly different from baseline and R2; \({}^{\text{h}}\) significantly different from baseline; \({}^{\text{h}}\) significantly different from baseline; R2.  
\end{table} 
Table 3: Dominant and non-dominant leg postural sway performances with different rest intervals following PAPE protocol. In the non-dominant leg, similar analyses revealed statistically significant differences in several sway metrics: mediolateral sway velocity (F\({}_{(4,\,96)}\) = 3.830, \(p\) = 0.02, \(1\) - \(\beta\) = 0.85, and \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.14), anteroposterior sway area (F\({}_{(4,\,96)}\) = 4.171, \(p\) = 0.02, \(1\) - \(\beta\) = 0.85, and \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.15), mediolateral sway area (F\({}_{(4,\,96)}\) = 12.707, \(p\) < 0.00, \(1\) - \(\beta\) = 0.89, and \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.36), and ellipse area (F\({}_{(4,\,96)}\) = 5.992, \(p\) = 0.01, \(1\) - \(\beta\) = 0.87, and \(\eta^{2}\) = 0.21). All effects were of large magnitude. Post hoc comparisons indicated that mediolateral sway velocity was significantly lower than baseline, in the R6 condition (\(p\) = 0.05, \(d\) = 0.91). Additionally, the R6 condition demonstrated significantly lower mediolateral sway area compared with baseline (\(p\) = 0.01, \(d\) = 1.22), R2 (\(p\) = 0.01, \(d\) = 1.09), and R8 (\(p\) < 0.00, \(d\) = 1.31).