## 3 Results
### Results on Left vs. Right  
The results in comparing both sides are shown in Table 7. The only significant difference occurred in the PSR case for step length. Other parameters are not significant differences between the two sides.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**SL Left (m)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Mean**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Std. Error**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**95\% Confidence Interval**} \\ \cline{5-6}  & & & **Std. Error** & **Lower Bound** & **Upper Bound** & \(\mathbf{p}\) \\ \hline SH Right (m) & & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{PSR} & male & 0.26 & 0.03 & 0.20 & 0.32 & 0.175 \\ \cline{2-6}  & female & 0.19 & 0.03 & 0.12 & 0.26 & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\(>\)10\% PSR} & male & 0.24 & 0.03 & 0.18 & 0.30 & 0.599 \\ \cline{2-6}  & female & 0.26 & 0.03 & 0.19 & 0.33 & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\(<\)10\% PSR} & male & 0.27 & 0.03 & 0.21 & 0.33 & 0.271 \\ \cline{2-6}  & female & 0.21 & 0.03 & 0.14 & 0.28 & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note. A general linear model for multivariate was used with gender as the main factor, and the covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: body height (m) = 1.72670, body mass (kg) = 71.785. PSR: preferred step rate, SL: step length, SH: max height of foot during step. \({}^{*}p\) < 0.05.  
\end{table}
Table 4: _Cont._  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & **Step Rate** & **Speed** & **Left Step Length** & **Left Step Height** & **Left Step Angle** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Step rate (step/min)} & Pearson Correlation & \multirow{2}{*}{1} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.257 *} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.079} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.047} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.141} \\ \cline{2-6}  & Sig. (2-tailed) & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Speed (m/s)} & Pearson Correlation & \multirow{2}{*}{0.257 *} & \multirow{2}{*}{1} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.901 **} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.541 **} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.179} \\ \cline{2-6}  & Sig. (2-tailed) & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Left step length (m)} & Pearson Correlation & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.079} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.901 **} & \multirow{2}{*}{1} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.622 **} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)0.180} \\ \cline{2-6}  & Sig. (2-tailed) & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Left step height (m)} & Pearson Correlation & \multirow{2}{*}{0.047} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.541 **} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.622 **} & \multirow{2}{*}{1} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.645 **} \\ \cline{2-6}  & Sig. (2-tailed) & & & & & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Left step angle (deg)} & Pearson Correlation & \multirow{3}{*}{0.141} & \multirow{3}{*}{\(-\)0.179} & \multirow{3}{*}{\(-\)0.180} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.645 **} & \multirow{3}{*}{1} \\ \cline{2-6}  & Sig. (2-tailed) & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \multirow{6}{*}{Left step angle (deg)} & Pearson Correlation & \multirow{3}{*}{0.275} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.164} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.162} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.000} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.162} \\ \cline{2-6}  & Sig. (2-tailed) & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note. * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). The number of trials n = 62.  
\end{table}
Table 5: Correlation coefficients between the parameters on the left side.