## 5 Design of the Toolkit 'Human-Energ Hotspot' with DSRM and HCD
### Evaluation  
Once the solution, in the form of a prototype, has reached a satisfactory level of development, the evaluation process begins. A detailed plan for the evaluation process is created. This process will involve multiple iterations, with feedback from users and stakeholders leading to modifications and improvements to the prototype [51]. In some cases, these iterations may involve revisiting earlier stages of the research process, such as the \"identify problem\" or \"design artifact\" phases, in order to ensure that the solution is aligned with the needs and priorities of stakeholders and is effectively addressing the identified problem [55, 56]. Evaluation in this research will be conducted through the Action Research methodology to demonstrate practical applicability [57, 58]. Additionally, various other methods could be employed depending on specific needs or circumstances. The methods could include prototyping and iterative design, surveys and questionnaires, focus groups, usability testing, heuristic evaluation, and user interviews [55, 56, 57, 58]. The initial version could be evaluated via prototyping and iterative design. Surveys and questionnaires could be distributed to employees before and after implementing the toolkit to ensure that the toolkit fits the purpose. Usability tests can be performed to assess the user-friendliness and ease of use of the tools and resources in the toolkit [55, 58]. Focus groups may be set up to gather collective insights and suggestions for improvement. With heuristic evaluation, experts will review the toolkit against established usability heuristics or a check list to identify potential design flaws and areas for enhancement. The evaluation process would employ Action Research and follow a structured approach. It would first identify the specific aspects of the toolkit to be evaluated, then analyze and reflect on the collected information to identify areas for improvement. In this phase, the \"HumanEnerg Hotspot\" toolkit would be assessed in a real-world setting, such as in industries, in order to collect data on its effectiveness. Finally, these insights would be used to refine the prototype, enhancing the toolkit's design. Navigation in the toolkit can be done in two ways: by clicking on the core tool components 'analyze','strategize', 'execute', or'reflect' or by utilizing the search bar and searching for'stress triggers.' For instance, as shown in Figure 5 below, a search for \"Artificial Intelligence (AI)\" as a stress trigger should highlight the most critical stress-inducing issues caused by AI advancements, such as job insecurities. This will be followed by suitable strategies, techniques, methods, or resource suggestions that can be applied in industry to boost human energy and productivity for each issue. The toolkit will continue to evolve post-deployment as ongoing feedback from its use in various geographic and industry settings will provide new insights into stress triggers and mitigating strategies. Figure 5 above provides a general overview of how the tools in the HumanEnerg Hotspot will be accessed. The tools will be accessed in two ways: by clicking the core tool group buttons from the user interface to explore various tools within a group or by conducting a search based on stress triggers. The diagram above demonstrates access to the tools associated with a specific stress trigger. To illustrate, a search by the stress trigger named \"Stress Trigger I\" (e.g., \"AI\") will retrieve all problems in the database related to 'Stress trigger I'. In our instance, all problems related to 'the impact AI (Artificial Intelligence) can have on human energy' will be retrieved. The user will then scan through the problem list to identify which problem instance best represents their concerns.