## 3 Results
### Compatibility Tests and Formulation of Bacterial Consortia  
The compatibilities between the ten selected strains are shown in Table 5. Thirteen potential bacterial consortia were formulated based on the compatibility assays and the previous experimental analyses. Three bacterial consortia were selected based on the presence of all the analyzed activities. Bacterial consortia (BC) compositions were BC1: _Pseudomonas_ sp. TmR7 and _Frondihabitans_ sp. GpP26d, BC2: _Pseudomonas_ sp. CcR1d and _Pseudomonas_ sp. NUR4a, and BC3: _Pseudomonas_ sp. TmR5a and _Curtobacterium_ sp. BmP22c (Figure 5). The characteristics of the three bacterial consortia are summarized in Table 6. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Strains**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{_Pss_} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{_Pc_} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{_Cmm_} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{_At_} \\ \cline{2-11}  & **YM** & **MH** & **KB** & **YM** & **MH** & **KB** & **YM** & **MH** & **YM** & **MH** \\ \hline _Pseudomonas_ sp. TmR1b* & + & \(-\) & ++ & + & \(-\) & +/\(-\) & + & ++ & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Pseudomonas_ sp. TmR5a* & \(-\) & \(-\) & + & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & + & + & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Pseudomonas_ sp. GcR15a* & +/\(-\) & \(-\) & + & + & \(-\) & +/\(-\) & ++ & + & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Pseudomonas_ sp. NUR4a* & ++ & \(-\) & + & ++ & \(-\) & \(-\) & ++ & ++ & + & \(-\) \\ _Pseudomonas_ sp. BlR7b & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Pseudomonas_ sp. BlR3 & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Pseudomonas_ sp. TmR7* & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & +/\(-\) & \(-\) & +/\(-\) & +/\(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Pseudomonas_ sp. CpK1d* & \(-\) & \(-\) & + & \(-\) & \(-\) & +/\(-\) & ++ & ++ & \(+\) & \(-\) \\ _Serratia_ sp. TmR3a & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & + & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Stentrorophononas_ sp. BmR35 & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Stentrophonomas_ sp. CpP23d & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(+\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Stentrophonomas_ sp. CpR10 & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Stentrophonomas_ sp. GcR23 & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Stentrophonomas_ sp. TmP43c & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Arthbroacter_ sp. BmP28* & + & \(-\) & + & + & + & + & + & + & \(-\) & ++ & \(-\) \\ _Curtobacterium_ sp. BmP22c* & + & \(-\) & \(-\) & ++ & \(-\) & \(-\) & ++ & +/\(-\) & ++ & \(-\) \\ _Brachbyacterium_ sp. TmP30* & \(-\) & + & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & +/\(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Frondihabitans_ sp. GpP26d * & + & \(-\) & \(-\) & + & \(-\) & \(-\) & ++ & + & + & + \\ _Sporosarcina_ sp. HsP12b & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Sporosarcina_ sp. HsR8 & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(+/-\) & \(+/-\) & \(-\) \\ _Flavobacterium_ sp. CpR5c & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(+/-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) \\ _Pseudomonas protgens_ CHA0 & + & \(-\) & + & ++ & \(-\) & + & ++ & + & + & \(-\) \\ \hline \end{tabular}  
* Selected strains. \(-\), no inhibition; +/\(-\), attenuated growth; +, +/\(-\), +50% growth inhibition; ++, \(\geq\)50% growth inhibition. _Pss, Pseudomonas_
* _Syringae_: v. _springae_; _Pc, _Pectobacterium_; _Cmm, Calwibacter nichiganensis_ subsp. _nichiganensis_; _At_, _Agrobacteriumium tunefaciens_; YM, Yeast Malt; MH, Müller-Hinton; KB, King B.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: Antagonistic activity against phytopathogenic bacteria by the radial streak method.