## 3 Results
\begin{tabular}{c} 1098 \\ (624–1544) \\ \end{tabular}  & \begin{tabular}{c} 1207 \\ (950–1749) \\ \end{tabular}  & \ \begin{tabular}{c} 1873 \\ (1149–2990) \\ \end{tabular}  &
\begin{tabular}{c} 14A total of 2400 aorta segments were analyzed for the intra- and interobserver reproducibility analysis, see Figure 3. The result of these analyses over all anatomical segments and systolic phases for the validation and training cohort are presented in Table 3 and Supplementary Materials Table S2, respectively. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Parameter**} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Anatomical Segments**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & **AoR** & **pAA** & **dAA** & **AoA** & **pDA** & **dDA** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Absolute Local** \\ **Normalized** \\ **Helicity Volume (mL)** \\ \end{tabular} } & 19.4 & 24.8 & 15.2 & 9.4 & 15.6 & 17.7 \\  & (10.5–27.3) & (18.9–30.2) & (10.4–21.7) & (7.0–13.6) & (12.2–18.2) & (13.7–19.6) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Volume (mL)**} & 44.1 & 53.2 & 41.1 & 28.6 & 38.4 & 31.5 \\  & (25.2–59.8) & (36.9–59.7) & (31.0–53.8) & (20.0–31.5) & (29.9–45.2) & (24.2–38.0) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Centerline Length (mm)**} & 31.0 & 40.8 & 40.0 & 37.3 & 65.4 & 64.1 \\  & (24.3–37.1) & (36.6–44.0) & (36.7–44.3) & (34.0–38.7) & (57.0–69.2) & (58.0–68.9) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Maximal Diameter (mm)**} & 48.7 & 44.7 & 41.2 & 34.3 & 31.3 & 27.3 \\  & (40.0–51.3) & (40.4–46.6) & (35.4–44.9) & (31.5–36.3) & (28.2–32.6) & (24.9–29.7) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Curvature Radius (mm)**} & 51.4 & 38.5 & 50.6 & 46.1 & 45.5 & 138.1 \\  & (42.9–71.1) & (36.2–46.6) & (43.3–61.3) & (40.8–59.7) & (37.3–53.7) & (102.0–164.5) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: _Cont._ \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Study**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Bland–Altman**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**COV (\%)**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Spearman RankCorrelation**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Intraclass Correlation**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**LoA\({}_{\text{diff}}\) (\%)**} \\ \cline{2-3} \cline{5-6}  & **Mean Diff** & & & **LoA** & & **Coefficient** \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Flow Displacement (\%)**} \\ \hline IA-O & \(-0.1\) & 2.8 & 19 & 0.81 & 0.94 & \(-9\) \\ \hline IE-O1 & \(-0.5\) & 4.8 & 32 & 0.70 & 0.84 & \(15\) \\ \hline IE-O2 & \(0.1\) & 4.4 & 30 & 0.70 & 0.85 & \(3\) \\ \hline IE-O3 & \(0.6\) & 4.1 & 27 & 0.79 & 0.87 & \(7\) \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Flow Jet Angle (\({}^{\circ}\))**} \\ \hline IA-O & \(0.3\) & 5.0 & 16 & 0.92 & 0.93 & \(-16\) \\ \hline IE-O1 & \(-0.3\) & 8.0 & 25 & 0.80 & 0.83 & \(-4\) \\ \hline IE-O2 & \(0.2\) & 7.1 & 23 & 0.85 & 0.86 & \(-9\) \\ \hline IE-O3 & \(0.5\) & 8.7 & 27 & 0.78 & 0.80 & \(-4\) \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{**WSS Magnitude (mPa)**} \\ \hline IA-O & \(0\) & \(43\) & \(3\) & \(1.00\) & \(1.00\) & \(-15\) \\ \hline IE-O1 & \(-33\) & 232 & 14 & 0.90 & 0.93 & \(-10\) \\ \hline IE-O2 & \(17\) & 161 & 10 & 0.93 & 0.97 & \(-25\) \\ \hline IE-O3 & \(50\) & 242 & 15 & 0.89 & 0.93 & \(30\) \\ \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Axial WSS (mPa)**} \\ \hline IA-O & \(-0\) & \(47\) & \(3\) & \(1.00\) & \(1.00\) & \(-59\) \\ \hline IE-O1 & \(-30\) & 240 & 16 & 0.92 & 0.94 & \(-58\) \\ \hline IE-O2 & \(19\) & 163 & 11 & 0.95 & 0.97 & \(-51\) \\ \hline IE-O3 & \(49\) & 244 & 17 & 0.92 & 0.94 & \(51\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Intra- and interobserver reproducibility: results of the validation cohort.