## 4 Discussion  
In the analysis of a total of 301 actions across the GR, FS, and WW styles, 1- and 2-point techniques were the most frequently applied in all the styles. In GR, 1- and 2-point techniques accounted for 92.7% of the total, while no 4-point techniques were observed in FS. In WW, 2-point techniques were the most preferred with a rate of 68.7%. This distribution indicates that low-risk techniques are prioritized in current wrestling strategies (Table 1). When the technical score distributions are analyzed, it is seen that 1- and 2-point, low-risk techniques are more frequently preferred in all wrestling styles. This finding is supported by a 2019 study, which also revealed that high-scoring (4-point) techniques were used quite rarely [19]. These findings confirm that athletes in high-level competitions adopt more cautious strategies by prioritizing low-risk techniques. Another study from 2015-2016 also confirmed this, showing that 2-point techniques were used significantly more frequently than 4-point techniques [20]. A study conducted on the Olympic Games found that low-scoring techniques (1 and 2 points) were preferred more frequently compared to high-scoring techniques (4 points) [21]. The rate of caution points was higher in the GR and FS styles compared to WW, indicating that athletes had more difficulty complying with the rules or that referee interventions occurred more frequently. This finding is supported by [PERSON]'s [22] technical analysis of the finals of the European Wrestling Championships, which reported that no caution points were awarded in FS and WW matches, while two caution points were given in GR \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Wrestling Style** & & & & Victory by & \\ \hline GR & Victory by Fall. & Three cautions & Technical & Technical & Decision by \\  & & due to error & Superiority. The & Superiority, with & points. The loser \\  & & against the rules. & & lower without & the loser scoring & technical points. \\ \hline f & 1 & 1 & 3 & 3 & 10 \\ \hline \% & 6.3 & 6.3 & 18.9 & 18.9 & 62.6 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{FS} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Victory by Technical} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Victory by Technical} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Decision by} \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Superiority. The} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Superiority, with} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{points. The loser} \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{the loser scoring} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{technical points.} \\  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{points.} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{technical points.} \\ \hline f & 3 & 3 & 12 & \\ \hline \% & 16.7 & 16.7 & 66.6 & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{WW} & \multirow{2}{*}{Victory by Fall.} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Decision by} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} \\  & & points. The loser & & \\ \cline{1-1}  & & technical points. & & \\ \hline f & 6 & 12 & & \\ \hline \% & 33.3 & 66.7 & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Distribution of classification points in wrestling matches. style. The restriction of techniques to the upper body in the Greco-Roman style appears to contribute to occasional passivity or rule violations by athletes. When comparing stepping outside rates across wrestling styles, the highest rate was observed in FS (21.1%), followed by GR (12.5%) and WW (8.7%). The high rate in FS is associated with the style's greater freedom of movement, while the GR rate is linked to the intense physical contact. The lower rate in WW is attributed to technique preferences or effectiveness. In a study based on Olympic data, the stepping outside rate was found to be higher in WW and lower in GR and FS [21]. [PERSON] et al. [23] stated that in the cadet category, the rate of stepping out increased with weight class. These findings indicate that as weight increases, the number of techniques applied in matches decreases, and accordingly, most points are gained by pushing the opponent out of the mat.