## 3 Results
### RT Values
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{4}{c}{**RFA-BL**} \\ \hline
**Tukey’s Multiple Comparisons Test** & **95.00\% CI of Difference** & **Adjusted _p_-Value** & **Summary** \\ \hline A–B & \(-25.16\) to \(-10.44\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–C & \(-26.56\) to \(-11.84\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–D & \(-30.76\) to \(-16.04\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–E & \(-11.56\) to \(3.158\) & 0.5934 & ns \\ A–F & \(-24.16\) to \(-9.442\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–G & \(-24.76\) to \(-10.04\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–H & \(-30.56\) to \(-15.84\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ B–C & \(-8.758\) to \(5.958\) & 0.9984 & ns \\ B–D & \(-12.96\) to \(1.758\) & 0.2463 & ns \\ B-E & \(6.242\) to \(20.96\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ B–F & \(-6.358\) to \(8.358\) & 0.9998 & ns \\ B–G & \(-6.958\) to \(7.758\) & \(>\)0.9999 & ns \\ B-H & \(-12.76\) to \(1.958\) & 0.2862 & ns \\ C–D & \(-11.56\) to \(3.158\) & 0.5934 & ns \\ C–E & \(7.642\) to \(22.36\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ C–F & \(-4.958\) to \(9.758\) & 0.9612 & ns \\ C–G & \(-5.558\) to \(9.158\) & 0.9924 & ns \\ C–H & \(-11.36\) to \(3.358\) & 0.6493 & ns \\ D–E & \(11.84\) to \(26.56\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ D–F & \(-0.7583\) to \(13.96\) & 0.1049 & ns \\ D–G & \(-1.358\) to \(13.36\) & 0.1785 & ns \\ D–H & \(-7.158\) to \(7.558\) & \(>\)0.9999 & ns \\ E–F & \(-19.96\) to \(-5.242\) & 0.0001 & *** \\ E–G & \(-20.56\) to \(-5.842\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ E–H & \(-26.36\) to \(-11.64\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ F–G & \(-7.958\) to \(6.758\) & \(>\)0.9999 & ns \\ F–H & \(-13.76\) to \(0.9583\) & 0.1260 & ns \\ G–H & \(-13.16\) to \(1.558\) & 0.2104 & ns \\ \hline \multicolumn{4}{c}{**RFA-MD**} \\ \hline
**[PERSON]’s multiple comparisons test** & **95.00\% CI of difference** & **Adjusted _p_-value** & **Summary** \\ \hline A–B & \(-39.74\) to \(-20.26\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–C & \(-36.34\) to \(-16.86\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–D & \(-43.94\) to \(-24.46\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–E & \(-18.14\) to \(1.342\) & 0.1324 & ns \\ A–F & \(-38.54\) to \(-19.06\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–G & \(-34.54\) to \(-15.06\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ A–H & \(-43.54\) to \(-24.06\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ B–C & \(-6.342\) to \(13.14\) & 0.9450 & ns \\ B–D & \(-13.94\) to \(5.542\) & 0.8522 & ns \\ B–E & \(11.86\) to \(31.34\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ B–F & \(-8.542\) to \(10.94\) & \(>\)0.9999 & ns \\ B–G & \(-4.542\) to \(14.94\) & 0.6692 & ns \\ B–H & \(-13.54\) to \(5.942\) & 0.9054 & ns \\ C–D & \(-17.34\) to \(2.142\) & 0.2207 & ns \\ C–E & \(8.458\) to \(27.94\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ C–F & \(-11.94\) to \(7.542\) & 0.9953 & ns \\ C–G & \(-7.942\) to \(11.54\) & 0.9987 & ns \\ C–H & \(-16.94\) to \(2.542\) & 0.2783 & ns \\ D–E & \(16.06\) to \(35.54\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ D–F & \(-4.342\) to \(15.14\) & 0.6274 & ns \\ D–G & \(-0.342\) to \(19.14\) & 0.0649 & ns \\ D–H & \(-9.342\) to \(10.14\) & \(>\)0.9999 & ns \\ E–F & \(-30.14\) to \(-10.66\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ E–G & \(-26.14\) to \(-6.658\) & 0.0001 & *** \\ E–H & \(-35.14\) to \(-15.66\) & \(<\)0.0001 & *** \\ F–G & \(-5.742\) to \(13.74\) & 0.8805 & ns \\ F–H & \(-14.74\) to \(4.742\) & 0.7100 & ns \\ G–H & \(-18.74\) to \(0.7422\) & 0.0871 & ns \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Summary of Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) multiple comparisons among all experimental groups. RFA-BL: Resonance Frequency Analysis measured in the Bucco-Lingual orientation; RFA-MD: Resonance Frequency Analysis measured in the Mesio-Distal orientation.