## 3 Results
### Selected Input Parameters
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Reference Group**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Stroke Patients Group**} \\ \cline{2-5}
**Parameter** & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Dominant Limb**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Non-Dominant Limb**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**dl vs. ndl**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Dominant Limb**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Non-Dominant Limb**} \\  & **Mean \(\pm\) Std (Min-Max)** & **Mean \(\pm\) Std (Min-Max)** & **\(p\)-Value** & **Mean \(\pm\) Std (Min-Max)** & **Mean \(\pm\) Std (Min-Max)** \\ \hline P20 & \(5.8\pm 3.4\) (1.3–16.3) & \(5.9\pm 3.8\) (2.1–18.9) & 0.203 & 11 \(\pm\) 6.3 (2.7–24.7) & 11.5 \(\pm\) 7.3 (2.5–37.1) \\ P21 & \(0.1\pm 0.1\) (0.0–4.0) & \(0.1\pm 0.1\) (0.0–4.0) & 0.739 & 0.2 \(\pm\) 0.1 (0.0–0.5) & 0.2 \(\pm\) 0.1 (0.0–0.6) \\ P22 & \(0.2\pm 0.1\) (1.0–1.5) & \(0.2\pm 0.1\) (0–0.5) & 0.043 * & 0.3 \(\pm\) 0.1 (1.0–10.5) & 0.3 \(\pm\) 0.1 (1.0–10.7) \\ P23 & \(7.6\pm 5.5\) (0.8–23.7) & \(7.4\pm 5.3\) (0.7–24) & 0.739 & 12.7 \(\pm\) 7.1 (1.8–26.5) & 11.8 \(\pm\) 7.2 (1.9–33.7) \\ P24 & \(9.8\pm 5.4\) (3.6–26.4) & \(10.4\pm 5.9\) (2.6–29.6) & 0.043 * & 15.8 \(\pm\) 7.3 (3–28.8) & 16.1 \(\pm\) 8.2 (3.2–40.8) \\ P25 & \(0.1\pm 0.1\) (0.0–3.3) & \(0.1\pm 0.1\) (0.0–0.3) & 0.267 & 0.1 \(\pm\) 0.1 (0.0–0.3) & 0.1 \(\pm\) 0.1 (0.0–0.5) \\ P26 & \(0.1\pm 0.1\) (0–0.3) & \(0.2\pm 0.1\) (0–0.4) & 0.747 & 0.1 \(\pm\) 0.1 (0–0.4) & 0.2 \(\pm\) 0.1 (0.1–0.6) \\ P27 & \(6.6\pm 4.8\) (0.4–17.5) & \(6.5\pm 4.7\) (0.7–19.1) & 0.267 & 5.2 \(\pm\) 4.8 (0–18.3) & 5.6 \(\pm\) 5.7 (0.2–27.6) \\ P28 & \(8.1\pm 4.8\) (1.6–19.6) & \(8.3\pm 4.6\) (1.9–20.2) & 0.043 * & 7.4 \(\pm\) 5.3 (1.2–20.9) & 8.5 \(\pm\) 6.4 (3.2–33.7) \\ P29 & \(10.1\pm 4.6\) (2.5–19) & \(8.7\pm 4\) (3.5–20.4) & 0.109 & 13.3 \(\pm\) 5.9 (4.6–30.3) & 12.8 \(\pm\) 7.1 (3.9–34.1) \\ P30 & \(12.3\pm 6.2\) (3.8–27.4) & \(12.2\pm 4.7\) (5.7–24.4) & 0.848 & 12.5 \(\pm\) 5.6 (3.3–29.5) & 14.5 \(\pm\) 6.8 (2.9–41.9) \\ \hline  & & & & & \\ \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: _Cont._  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline  & **Reference Group vs. Stroke Patients Group** & **Reference Group vs. Stroke Patients Group** \\
**Parameter** & \(p\)**-Value** & \(p\)**-Value** \\  & **Dominant Limb** & **Non-Dominant Limb** \\ \hline P1 & 0.011 * & 0.098 \\ P2 & \(<\)0.001 * & 0.632 \\ P3 & 0.010 * & 0.005 * \\ P4 & \(<\)0.001 * & \(<\)0.001 * \\ P5 & 0.016 * & \(<\)0.001 * \\ P6 & 0.714 & \(<\)0.001 * \\ P7 & 0.371 & 0.006 * \\ P8 & 0.164 & 0.006 * \\ P Results of the Student's independent-samples \(t\)-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests, are shown in Table 3. No statistically significant differences were found in the motion of the wrist joint (P13, P14), movements in the lumbar section of the spine (P25-P28) or the motion range in the shoulder joint (P30). However, statistically significant differences between the reference and the stroke patient group were recorded in at least one upper limb. Selection of Input Parameters Taking into Account the Percentage Distribution of Parameters beyond the Standard  
With reference to the methodology described in Section 2.4.1, input parameter selection was carried out with consideration of the percentage distribution of parameters beyond the standard. Figures 2 and 3 show the percentage distribution of the parameters obtained for the patients in 4 defined ranges (green, yellow, orange and red), for both the dominant and non-dominant upper limbs. On the basis of these results, the 16 parameters with the highest values of deviation from the values obtained in the reference group was applied to both the dominant and non-dominant upper limbs. The selected parameters are collated in Table 4.  
Table 4 shows a set of 16 parameters that most differentiated the results obtained for a given patient and the result obtained for the reference group. These are the parameters for which the percentage distribution of selected parameters within the standard (green classifier) was lowest.