## 4 Results
### Spatiotemporal Distribution Statistical Analysis  
From a spatial perspective, the dataset covers numerous tectonically active regions worldwide, particularly areas near plate boundaries and intra-continental fault zones, thereby ensuring broad applicability across diverse tectonic settings. As shown in Figure 5a, the 62 earthquakes included in this dataset are predominantly located in seismically active regions such as the Pamir-Himalaya belt, the Middle East, the western Americas, and the Mediterranean. These events frequently occur along active plate boundaries--including collision, rift, and subduction zones--that are characterized by high seismicity and consti  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Lat. (deg)** & **Lon. (deg)** & **Date** & **Magnitude (Mw)** & **Depth (km)** & **Type** \\ \hline \(-\)96.07 & 16.02 & 23 June 2020 & 7.4 & 21.5 & Thrust \\ \hline
82.35 & 35.71 & 25 June 2020 & 6.3 & 13.3 & Normal fault \\ \hline
86.87 & 33.1 & 22 July 2020 & 6.4 & 16.8 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
16.22 & 45.36 & 29 December 2020 & 6.4 & 12 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
100.39 & 51.32 & 11 January 2021 & 6.8 & 13.9 & Normal fault \\ \hline \(-\)22.25 & 63.82 & 24 February 2021 & 5.6 & 12 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
22.13 & 39.65 & 3 March 2021 & 6.3 & 12 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
21.96 & 39.78 & 12 March 2021 & 5.6 & 12 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
50.54 & 29.62 & 18 April 2021 & 5.9 & 12 & Thrust \\ \hline
98.46 & 34.66 & 21 May 2021 & 7.4 & 12 & Strike-slip \\ \hline \(-\)73.64 & 18.5 & 14 August 2021 & 7.1 & 12 & Thrust \\ \hline
56.03 & 27.54 & 14 November 2021 & 6.1 & 13.8 & Thrust \\ \hline
101.31 & 37.81 & 7 January 2022 & 6.7 & 13.7 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
69.56 & 32.94 & 21 June 2022 & 6.1 & 15.5 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
55.13 & 26.69 & 1 July 2022 & 6.1 & 12 & Thrust \\ \hline
92.96 & 33.15 & 14 August 2022 & 5.7 & 17.4 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
39.92 & 14.8 & 26 December 2022 & 5.5 & 12 & Normal fault \\ \hline
37.45 & 37.55 & 6 February 2023 & 7.8 & 15.1 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
37.22 & 38.08 & 6 February 2023 & 7.7 & 12 & Strike-slip \\ \hline
36.03 & 36.06 & 20 February 2023 & 6.3 & 12 & Normal fault \\ \hline
73.22 & 38.16 & 23 February 2023 & 6.8 & 14.5 & Strike-slip \\ \hline \(-\)8.31 & 30.94 & 8 September 2023 & 6.9 & 23.8 & Thrust \\ \hline
61.87 & 34.6 & 7 October 2023 & 6.3 & 12 & Thrust \\ \hline
62.09 & 34.62 & 15 October 2023 & 6.3 & 12 & Thrust \\ \hline
102.85 & 35.82 & 18 December 2023 & 6.1 & 17.6 & Thrust \\ \hline
78.56 & 41.19 & 22 January 2024 & 7.1 & 16.1 & Thrust \\ \hline
93.1 & 33.44 & 7 March 2024 & 5.6 & 19.3 & Strike-slip \\ \hline \end{tabular} The data is sourced from GCMT (Global Centroid Moment Tensor).  
\end{table}
Table 1: _Cont._tute a significant portion of the dataset. In contrast, the dataset contains relatively fewer earthquake interferograms from tropical regions. This limitation arises not from the lack of seismic activity but from the dense vegetation cover and complex climatic conditions that hinder the effective detection of seismic deformation using InSAR techniques. Overall, the dataset reflects significant global tectonic diversity and broad spatial coverage. Figure 5b illustrates the temporal distribution of the earthquakes. The dataset spans from 2015 to 2024, offering extensive temporal coverage. As seismic events continue to occur over time, additional InSAR coseismic interferograms are expected to be integrated into the dataset, thereby enhancing its completeness and utility for future research.