## 3 Results  
In this section the outcomes of the application of analysis methodology are reported. Regarding the input parameters used in the equations relative to the ARERA calculation procedures, for each considered technical datasheets, these are given in Table 3 in Appendix B. The following Figures 2 and 3 show the achievable energy savings (AES) on the total annual consumption, relative to the application of the intervention proposed by each considered ARERA datasheet, to the two agritourisms. On the right side of the graphs, the EU Ecolabel points corresponding to each datasheet are also reported. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Datasheet N\({}^{\circ}\)** & **Proposed Intervention** & **Cost** \\ \hline
5 & Replacement of simple glazing with double glazing & 407.13 \(\xi\)/m\({}^{2}\) \\ \hline
7 & Use of photovoltaic systems with an electrical power & 1898.42 \(\xi\)/kW\({}_{\text{P}}\) \\ \hline
8T & Installation of solar collectors for the production of & 578.73 \(\xi\)/m\({}^{2}\) \\  & domestic hot water & \\ \hline
15T & Installation of outdoor air electric heat pumps & \\  & instead of boilers in newly built or renovated & 4901.323 \(\xi\)/UFR \({}^{*}\) \\  & residential buildings & \\ \hline
19T & Installation of high efficiency outdoor air & 490.13 \(\xi\)/kW \\  & conditioners with cooling capacity lower than 12 kW\({}_{\text{f}}\) & 490.13 \(\xi\)/kW \\ \hline
27T & Installation of electric heat pump for domestic hot & 570.65 \(\xi\)/UFR \({}^{*}\) \\  & water production in new and existing plants & \\ \hline
6 & Wall and roof insulation & 29.32 \(\xi\)/m\({}^{2}\) \\ \hline
20T & Thermal insulation of walls and roofs for summer & 29.32 \(\xi\)/m\({}^{2}\) \\  & cooling in domestic and service sectors & 29.32 \(\xi\)/m\({}^{2}\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \({}^{*}\) UFR—Reference physical unit.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: ARERA technical datasheets proposed interventions costs. _Bergi_ agriouturism' achievable energy savings for each datasheet  
Figure 3: Achievable energy savings (AES), on an annual basis, and EU Ecolabel points relative to each considered ARERA datasheet for _Bergi_ agriouturism. Figure 2: Achievable energy savings (AES), on an annual basis, and EU Ecolabel points relative to each considered ARERA datasheet for _Villa Dafine_ agriouturism. Figures 2 and 3 show how, amongst the ARERA proposed interventions enabling the obtaining of an EU Ecolabel score, the implementation of a photovoltaic (PV) system (datasheet 7) would be the one allowing the gain of a greater advantage in terms of energy consumption. Concerning the savings related to the domestic hot water (DHW) category, by comparing datasheets 8T and 27T, which are alternatives to each other, it can be observed how 8T would be the more convenient choice. Regarding the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) category, the savings achievable through the application of datasheets 15T and 19T should, instead, be considered jointly (15T + 19T) as they can be attributed to the same improvement intervention. As for datasheet 5, although it represents one of the easiest measures to implement, it does not seem to bring the benefits that would have been expected. With respect to datasheets 6 and 20T, also in this case the consideration that the attainable benefits must be considered together (6 + 20T) is valid. As already explained these two datasheets fall out of the Ecolabel scoring scheme, nevertheless they represent the second-best intervention that allows the highest energy savings, after datasheet 7. The overall obtained results for the two considered agitourisms are reported in Tables 5 and 6. As can be observed, according to what has been previously pointed out, a single intervention cost was given to datasheets 15T and 19T as the proposed intervention corresponds to the same type of system, i.e., the same system allows operation for both heating and cooling. The same consideration can be made for datasheets 6 and 20T in relation to the insulation of the building.