# VR Reading Revolution: Decoding User Intentions Through Task-Technology Fit and Emotional Resonance
## 4 Findings
### Hypothesis Testing  
In this study, AMOS23.0 was utilized to perform the calculations and the estimation was performed using the maximum likelihood method, while the results are displayed in Figure 2. From Table 9, it can be seen that the model \(\text{CMIN}/\text{DF}\) of this study is about 1.200, which is less than the standard of less than 3. GFI, AGFI, NFI, TLI, IFI, CFI all reached the standard of more than 0.9, the RMR was 0.065, which is less than 0.08, the RMSEA is 0.026, which is less than 0.08, and all the fitting indexes are in line with the general standard of the study, so it can be considered that this model shows good fit. As shown by the path \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l} \hline \hline
**Variant** & **Subject** & **Factor Load** & **CR** & **AVE** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Privacy and security risk (PSR)} & PSR1 & 0.833 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.909} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.770} \\  & PSR2 & 0.905 & & & \\  & PSR3 & 0.893 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{VR perceived immersion (PI)} & PI1 & 0.806 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.840} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.636} \\  & PI2 & 0.765 & & & \\  & PI3 & 0.821 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Emotional resonance (ER)} & ER1 & 0.811 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.826} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.614} \\  & ER2 & 0.747 & & & \\  & ER3 & 0.791 & & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Virtual book forums’ sense of belonging (VBFSB)} & VBFBSB1 & 0.758 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.763} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.881} \\  & VBFBSB2 & 0.765 & & \\ \cline{1-1}  & VBFBSB3 & 0.763 & & & \\ \cline{1-1}  & VBFBSB4 & 0.728 & & \\ \cline{1-1}  & VBFBSB5 & 0.849 & & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Usage intention (UI)} & UI1 & 0.882 & \multirow{4}{*}{0.915} & \multirow{4}{*}{0.781} \\  & UI2 & 0.859 & & & \\ \cline{1-1}  & UI3 & 0.910 & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: _Cont._  
\begin{table} \begin{tabular}{l l l l l l l l} \hline \hline  & **VBFSE** & **TTF** & **PR** & **PSR** & **PI** & **ER** & **VBFSB** & **UI** \\ \hline VBFSE & **0.789** & & & & & & \\ TTF & 0.340 *** & **0.756** & & & & & \\ PR & 0.344 ** & 0.317 ** & **0.841** & & & & \\ PSR & \(-\)0.369 ** & \(-\)0.222 ** & \(-\)0.217 ** & ** & **0.877** & & & \\ PI & 0.332 ** & 0.224 ** & 0.206 ** & \(-\)0.242 ** & **0.797** & & & \\ ER & 0.379 ** & 0.244 ** & 0.239 ** & \(-\)0.230 ** & 0.213 ** & **0.784** & & \\ VBFSB & 0.382 ** & 0.265 ** & 0.259 ** & \(-\)0.230 ** & 0.208 ** & 0.431 ** & **0.774** & \\ UI & 0.413 ** & 0.373 ** & 0.312 ** & \(-\)0.401 ** & 0.297 ** & 0.454 ** & 0.579 ** & **0.884** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}   
*coefficient test (Table 10), virtual book forums' self-expression has a significant positive effect on emotional resonance (\(\beta\) = 0.480, \(p\) < 0.05), and the hypothesis is valid; virtual book forums' self-expression has a significant positive effect on virtual book communities' sense of belonging (\(\beta\) = 0.299, \(p\) < 0.05), and the hypothesis is valid; and emotional resonance has a significant positive effect on virtual book forums' sense of belonging (\(\beta\) = 0.299, \(p\) < 0.05); further, belonging (\(\beta\) = 0.376, \(p\) < 0.05) has a significant positive effect, and the hypothesis is valid; task-technology fit has a significant positive effect on usage intention (\(\beta\) = 0.165, \(p\) < 0.05) and the hypothesis is valid; peer recommendation has a significant positive effect on usage intention (\(\beta\) = 0.055, \(p\) > 0.05) and the hypothesis is not valid; privacy and security risk has a significant negative effect on usage intention (\(\beta\) = \(-\)0.210, \(p\) < 0.05) and the hypothesis is valid; the perceived immersion of VR does not have a significant effect on usage intention (\(\beta\) = 0.079, \(p\) > 0.05) and the hypothesis is not valid; and emotional resonance has a significant positive effect on usage intention (\(\beta\) = 0.180, \(p\) < 0.05) and the hypothesis is valid; virtual book forums sense of belonging has a significant positive effect on usage intention (\(\beta\) = 0.420, \(p\) < 0.05), the hypothesis is valid.