# SteXMeC: A Student eXperience Evaluation Methodology with Cultural Aspects
## 5 A Student eXperience Evaluation Methodology with Cultural Aspects
### Execution Stage (S2)
#### 5.3.2 Inspections (S2.2)
Interviews [47]:  
The Interview Method is designed to gather qualitative student data regarding their experiences, which will be analyzed and interpreted in stages S3 and S4. The outcome of the interview process is the generation of a comprehensive data set, referred to as Student Test Results. The key processes involved in this method include the following:* Interview Design: 1. Evaluators, in collaboration with interview facilitators, will determine the interview type based on resource availability: 1. Structured interviews for scenarios with limited resources. 2. Semi-structured interviews for scenarios with moderate resources. 3. Unstructured interviews for scenarios with ample resources. 2. Experts will develop the interview questions and define the sample size of students, ensuring alignment with the evaluation's objectives and available resources. 3. Experts will select the interview format (remote, in-person, or hybrid) based on the scope of the evaluation and resource considerations. In-person interviews are strongly recommended where feasible. * Interview Execution: 1. The interview will be conducted using the appointed evaluators' modality and settings. 2. Demographic information should be collected at the beginning of the interview. 3. Audiovisual materials, including interview recordings, are highly recommended for in-depth analysis. 4. Interviewers must ensure that students are informed about the confidentiality of their data and obtain formal consent when required. 5. The results of the interviews should be thoroughly documented and included in the formal evaluation report. Table 15 in Appendix A explains the inputs and procedures established to execute the Interview method. * Survey [48]:  
The Survey Method aims to collect qualitative and quantitative data regarding students' experiences and perceptions, which will be analyzed and interpreted later during stages S3 and S4. The survey was designed by adapting questions from two established surveys, each focusing on student experience and cultural aspects. The resulting survey was validated through statistical methods and expert review, ensuring its reliability and relevance. A comprehensive data set, the Student Test Results, is generated upon completing the survey. This data set serves as a key input for subsequent analysis stages, providing critical insights into the students' interactions and perceptions. Table 16 in Appendix A explains the inputs and procedures established to execute the survey method. * Focus Group [49; 50]:  
The Focus Group Method aims to gather qualitative data regarding students' experiences and perceptions for subsequent analysis and interpretation in stages S3 and S4. By conducting a focus group, evaluators can collect a comprehensive data set or Student Test Results, which provides valuable insights into the student experience. To ensure the process is thorough, the following procedures are recommended:  
* Focus Group Design: 1. A qualified evaluator will be appointed as the focus group(s) moderator. Selecting a moderator with a background in academia or psychology is advisable to facilitate discussions effectively. 2. The appointed experts have the flexibility to formulate the necessary questions to either verify previously collected data or address any existing information gaps. 3. Organizing focus groups consisting of 5 to 7 participants is recommended, ensuring a manageable size for in-depth discussion. 4. The experts will determine the execution scenarios (remote, in-person, or hybrid) based on available resources and the scope of the evaluation. In-person sessions are highly recommended for a richer interaction. 2. Focus Group Execution: 1. The interview process will follow the modality and setting outlined by the designated evaluators. 2. At the beginning of the session, students will be asked to provide demographic data to contextualize the insights gained. 3. The moderator will actively encourage the participation of all students to ensure a diverse range of opinions and experiences are captured. 4.