## 4 Discussion and Conclusive Remarks
However, the daytime TEC response to CIR storms appeared to be different from that of ionospheric F2 peak densities at high and middle latitudes, as NmF2 had a long period of negative response for about 2-3 days, whereas the TEC response was mostly positive. [PERSON] et al. [66], by conducting an analysis of the storm event of March 2015 at middle latitudes, reported SED signatures in TEC, but not in NmF2. Another example comes from the SWIF model scenarios: the comparative analysis of the variations in foF2 and TEC during eleven geomagnetic storm events that occurred in solar cycle 24 revealed similarities but also differences in the storm-time response of the two characteristics with respect to the local time and the latitude of the observation point. The most important difference concerns the intensity of positive storm effects, which appeared significantly greater in the TEC case. Moreover, positive storm effects at higher latitudes in case the observation point at storm onset time is located in the morning sector were present only for TEC. The TEC positive phase was more intense in the lower latitudes, especially in the afternoon hours [67]. This research received no external funding. Not applicable. * (25) [PERSON] Ionospheric F region storms. In _Handbook of Atmospheric Electrodynamics_; [PERSON]; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; pp. 195-248. * (26) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms. _J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys._**1994**, _99_, 3893-3914. [CrossRef]
* (27) [PERSON] Ionospheric storms--A review. _Space Sci. Rev._**1999**, _88_, 563-601. [CrossRef]
* (28) [PERSON] On explaining the local time variation of ionospheric storm effects. In _Annales Geophysicae_; Copernicus GmbH: Gottingen, Germany, 1993; Volume 11, pp. 1-9. * (29) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Prompt penetration electric fields (PEFs) and their ionospheric effects during the great magnetic storm of 30-31 October 2003. _J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys._**2008**, _113_, A05311. [CrossRef]
* (30) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Ionospheric Storm-Enhanced Density Plumes. In _Ionosphere Dynamics and Applications_; [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON]; AGU Geophysical Monograph Series; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; Volume 260, pp. 115-126. * (31) [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] Ionospheric response to the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm: A global multi-instrumental overview. _J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys._**2015**, _120_, 9023-9037. [CrossRef]
* (32) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] SAMI3-RCM simulation of the 17 March 2015 geomagnetic storm. _J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys._**2017**, _122_, 1246-1257. [CrossRef]
* (33) [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON] Middle- and low-latitude ionosphere response to 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm. _J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys._**2016**, _121_, 3421-3438. [CrossRef]
* (34) [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] [PERSON] Unprecedented Hemispheric Asymmetries During a Surprise Ionospheric Storm: A Game of Drivers. _J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys._**2020**, _125_, e2019 JA027261. [CrossRef]
* (35) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Global Ionospheric and Thermospheric Effects of the June 2015 Geomagnetic Disturbances: Multi-Instrumental Observations and Modeling. _J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys._**2017**, _122_, 11716-11742. [CrossRef]
* (36) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; et al. Was Magnetic Storm the Only Driver of the Long-Duration Enhancements of Daytime Total Electron Content in the Asian-Australian Sector between 7 and 12 September 2017? _J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys._**2018**, _123_, 3217-3232. [CrossRef]
* (37) [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Positive and negative ionospheric disturbances at middle latitudes during geomagnetic storms. _Geophys. Res. Lett._**2000**, _27_, 3579-3582.