## 5 Results  
Figure 2(a) shows the collapse risk situation in 2014, whereby the centre-west of the Madrid Region and the belt around the city of Madrid present high CI values, higher than the threshold established by the Madrid Region Fire Department. This information is completed with the total time dedicated to all the incidents attended by the teams from each station, including both the displacement and the action itself, for the year 2014 (see Table 3, in the column headed \"only old fire stations\"). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Total Annual Workload in Minutes**} \\ \hline
**Fire Station** & **Only Old Fire** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Old Stations** \\ **and One New** \\ **Fire Station** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Old Stations** \\ **and One New** \\ **Fire Station** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Old Stations** \\ **and Two New** \\ **Fire Stations** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Old Stations** \\ **and Three New** \\ **Fire Stations** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Old Stations** \\ **and Four New** \\ **Fire Stations** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Old Stations** \\ **and Five New** \\ **Fire Stations** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Alcobendas & 70,710.89 & 52,807.52 & 49,981.02 & 45,836.52 & 46,328.02 & 46,328.02 \\ Tres Cantos & 61,491.43 & 54,928.02 & 46,460.52 & 42,154.60 & 42,154.60 & 42,154.60 \\ Lozoyuela & 34,694.48 & 29,725.51 & 30,899.01 & 31,072.51 & 31,072.51 & 31,072.51 & 31,072.51 \\ Coslada & 59,195.01 & 38,164.01 & 35,215.01 & 33,164.01 & 33,164.01 & 34,200.01 \\ Alcala & 101,915.47 & 62,807.52 & 56,981.02 & 48,154.52 & 46,100.00 & 47,501.52 \\ Arganda & 88,938.97 & 79,287.02 & 60,460.52 & 57,661.30 & 49,899.01 & 42,124.00 \\ Torrejón & 70,657.96 & 68,164.01 & 51,684.51 & 47,990.51 & 25,817.01 & 25,817.01 \\ Parla & 93,981.36 & 79,337.51 & 49,337.51 & 45,259.49 & 42,416.00 & 29,337.51 \\ Villaviciosa & 76,049.88 & 58,940.02 & 59,899.01 & 55,306.63 & 28,164.01 & 25,817.01 \\ Aranjuez & 60,839.03 & 49,337.51 & 45,830.51 & 41,103.10 & 39,337.51 & 29,337.51 \\ Aldea del & 27,198.60 & 28,164.01 & 27,344.10 & 30,534.10 & 28,000.00 & 28,164.01 \\ Fresno & & & & & & \\ San Martin de & 29,856.05 & 27,856.05 & 28,164.01 & 29,295.01 & 29,814.01 & 28,164.01 \\ Valdeiglesias & 59,307.85 & 43,419.51 & 43,419.51 & 39,081.96 & 36,031.96 & 34,114.00 \\ Getafe & 46,209.78 & 39,337.51 & 35,412.51 & 33,337.51 & 27,890.01 & 29,337.51 \\ Valdemoro & 73,743.52 & 63,369.02 & 53,501.52 & 49,154.52 & 49,154.52 & 49,154.50 \\ Collado Villalba & 48,296.74 & 41,072.51 & 28,246.01 & 29,058.60 & 41,072.51 & 35,114.00 \\ El Escorial & 40,795.70 & 37,552.01 & 34,938.00 & 34,100.01 & 35,205.01 & 24,031.51 \\ Navacerrada & 117,350.04 & 75,104.02 & 58,981.02 & 53,210.3 & 53,210.3 & 48,556.00 \\ Pozuelo & 38,894.18 & 29,164.01 & 28,164.01 & 29,276.01 & 28,164.01 & 28,164.01 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Locations of old and new fire stations and workloads for each optimisation process. Table 3 also shows the results of the optimisation processes on the workloads of each FS for the incidents in 2014 in terms of the workloads for the old and new (in bold) FS. Their locations are shown in Figure 4, along with the locations of the existing stations.