## 5 Discussion
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{p{42.7 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt} p{28.5 pt}} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Study**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Aim**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Indusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Indusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Diffusion**} \\  & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \hline [PERSON] et al. [25] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 11 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [29] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 11 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [31] & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 10 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [32] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 20 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [31; 36] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 11 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [30] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 11 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [33] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 11 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [38] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 11 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [36] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 11 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [35] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 20 \\ \hline [PERSON] et al. [57] & 2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 & 0 & / & / & / & / & / & 11 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: _Cont._the typical postoperative cast immobilization, a walking boot was employed along with physiotherapy beginning one week after surgery. At three years, there were no recurrences, few surgical side effects, and an average three-month return to sports [25]. The use of the calcaneofibular ligament is a good way to hold the tendons in place, which is a good alternative to direct SPR repair [49; 50; 51]. [PERSON] and [PERSON] refined the technique to prevent complications. They proposed to ream out the fibular core from the tip parallel to the retromalleolar groove to thin the cortical rim. Afterward, the cortical rim is impacted to obtain a better result [52; 53]. Other techniques, such as the use of the anterior part of the peroneus brevis tendon as described by [PERSON] and [PERSON] [54; 55], showed good but not better results than direct SPR repair and groove deepening. Conservative treatment showed a very low (<50%) success rate with nonsurgical treatment in patients with chronic injuries [18; 56; 57]. Controversial ideas exist in the literature about the role of conservative treatment. There is concern that if these injuries are left untreated, the traction line in the dislocated position will cause adaptive shortening of the fibulae, resulting in loss of power in the stride phase and weakness in valgus. This can predispose patients to serious injuries [58]. Almost half of the patients analyzed required surgery [59]. The surgical treatment of acute injuries showed excellent results and a rapid recovery [50; 60; 61; 62]. [PERSON] et al. in 1920 described the first bone block procedure. These types of procedures require the creation of a posterior lip to prevent subluxation or dislocation of the peroneal tendons [63]. Some patients are not eligible or refuse to undergo surgery, so it is important to know the clinical outcomes of non-surgical interventions [64]. Taping, compressive bandages, and early mobilization are associated with a high rate of recurrent dislocation [18; 59]. The most important result of this study is that groove deepening with SPR repair and isolated SPR repair are both successful treatments for peroneal tendon dislocation.