_Applied_  
_sciences_  
_Article_  
Relationship between Ice Hockey-Specific Complex Test (IHCT) and Match Performance  
**[PERSON] 1,*\({}^{\copyright}\), [PERSON] 2, [PERSON] 1, [PERSON] 3 and [PERSON] 1**  
1 Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany; [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (K.-S.D.); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (S.S.)  
2 Department of Health Sciences, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA; [EMAIL_ADDRESS]  
3 University Clinic and Policlinic of Radiology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany; [EMAIL_ADDRESS]  
* Correspondence: [EMAIL_ADDRESS]; Tel. : +49-345-557-1317; Fax : +49-345-557-4899  
**Featureud Application: Ice hockey requires many different physical characteristics (e.g., endurance, speed, strength, core stability, postural regulation) that are completed on ice. Therefore, it is important to develop sufficient on-ice tests with respects to these characteristics and that are closely related to match performance (MP). Currently, most investigations validate off-ice and on-ice tests using MP because no alternative gold standard is available. In this context, the parametrization of the MP is the crucial question, but very little evidence is currently available in the scientific literature. This study contains a comparison of test (IHCT) and match performance data and provides a valuable contribution for coaches and sport scientists regarding the clarification of the interaction of on-ice testing and match performance.**  
This prospective study aimed to validate the IHCT using a match performance score (MPS). Seventeen 3 rd league male professional ice hockey field players (mean \(\pm\) SD; age: 28.0 \(\pm\) 6.95 years; 10 forwards, 7 defenders) completed the IHCT and were observed in the subsequent competitive match period. Match performance data were collected over 2 months (number of matches: 13-15). Based on these evaluated matches, the MPS consisting of goals, assists, penalty time, plus-minus, and number of matches was calculated for each player. The IHCT contains load parameters (e.g., 10 m and 30 m skate times, transition/weave agility times with and without a puck, slap and wrist shot puck velocities on goal) and stress parameters (e.g., lactate, heart rate). The 30 m sprint skate without puck (r\({}^{2}\) = 0.41) and the maximum wrist shot velocity before test (r\({}^{2}\) = 0.36) were the test performance parameters with the highest relevance for match performance. The velocity of shots on goal (SOG) displayed the highest correlation for any on-ice performance parameter (30 m sprint without puck r = 0.76). These results provide evidence of the validity of the IHCT and the usefulness of the MPS to quantify match performance. Obviously, sprint and shot velocities are important parameters to be a successful ice hockey player. Based on these findings, IHCT and MPS are valuable assessments for coaches to evaluate the individual match performance and the effectiveness of training programs. Further research is needed to extend the scope of the IHCT and MPS for 1 st and 2 nd league players and for a stronger differentiation between forwards and defenders.  
**Keywords:** on-ice performance; match performance; team sports; ice-hockey