# Analysis of Development Coordination Levels between Skywalk Systems and Urban Spatial Environments
## 6 Conclusions  
This study quantifies the level of coordinated development and spatial distribution patterns of skywalk systems and urban spatial environments in North America and Asia through coupled coordination modeling and cluster analysis methods. It summarizes the \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **C1** & \begin{tabular}{c} **C2** \\ **(\({}^{\circ}\)C)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C3** \\ **(mm)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C4** \\ **(mm)** \\ \end{tabular} & **C5** & \begin{tabular}{c} **C6** \\ **(\%)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C7** \\ **(USD)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C8** \\ **(\%)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C9** \\ **(Thousands)** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **C10** \\ **(km\({}^{2}\))** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **C11** \\ **(Thousands/km\({}^{2}\))** \\ \end{tabular} & **C12** & **C13** & **C14** \\ \hline Rochester & 157 & 7.1 & 880.6 & 1348.7 & 19 & 0.22 & 79,159 & 0.55 & 4.0 & 0.25 & 16.00 & 2 & 0 & 1.0 \\ New York & 98 & 16.3 & 924.3 & 170.2 & 4 & 0.17 & 62,463 & 0.74 & 11.8 & 2.41 & 4.90 & 1 & 0 & 2.3 \\ Yokohama & 174 & 5.2 & 608.3 & 1305.6 & 2 & 0.22 & 75,389 & 0.78 & 1.8 & 7.50 & 0.24 & 2 & 0 & 1.0 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: Data on Elements of Urban Environment Indicators for typical cities of type 3. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **C1** & \begin{tabular}{c} **C2** \\ **(\({}^{\circ}\)C)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C3** \\ **(mm)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C4** \\ **(mm)** \\ \end{tabular} & **C5** & \begin{tabular}{c} **C6** \\ **(\%)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C7** \\ **(USD)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **C8** \\ **(\%)** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **C9** \\ **(Thousands)** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **C10** \\ **(km\({}^{2}\))** \\ \end{tabular} & **C12** & **C13** & **C14** \\ \hline Akron & 121 & 10.9 & 1055.9 & 1198.9 & 4 & 0.08 & 35,074 & 0.75 & 5.3 & 1.08 & 4.89 & 1 & 0 & 1.0 \\ Syracuse & 138 & 9.2 & 1013.0 & 3246.1 & 8 & 0.17 & 46,677 & 0.91 & 7.4 & 5.69 & 1.30 & 2 & 0 & 0.5 \\ Tampa & 0 & 22.8 & 1256.8 & 0.0 & 20 & 0.32 & 118,657 & 0.93 & 16.0 & 7.58 & 2.11 & 3 & 0 & 1.0 \\ Kansas City & 18 & 11.0 & 637.0 & 140.7 & 2 & 0.34 & 70,858 & 0.91 & 4.1 & 0.25 & 16.14 & 2 & 0 & 0.6 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 9: Data on Elements of Urban Environment Indicators for typical cities of type 4.  
distribution pattern of coordinated and consistent development between skywalk systems and the urban environment in North America and Asia. Specifically, this study concentrates on the cold region of the Great Lakes and the hot region of southern U.S.A., while targeting high-density cities in Asia. Four types of skywalk systems are summarized: attached and nodal closed skywalk network systems, traversing and attached covered and windowless skywalk node systems, traversing and nodal closed skywalk node systems, and attached closed skywalk linear systems; it is found that attached and nodal closed skywalk network systems tend to result in a significant waste of urban resources. The traversing and attached covered and windowless skywalk node systems have a more substantial effect on ground vitality reduction. This suggests that the higher the degree of coupling, the greater the impact on the city. Moreover, all closed skywalk systems risk undermining the positive attributes of the public spaces they occupy. The innovation of this research lies in applying coupled coordination modeling and cluster analysis methods to study skywalk systems. An evaluation system is constructed to assess the interplay between skywalk systems and urban spatial environments. The study then evaluates the level of developmental coordination and contrasts the coordination levels between two distinct regions: North America and Asia.