## 5 Conclusions  
The data show a forest area with well-defined seasonal patterns, with energy and water flows being controlled by radiative availability, and CO\({}_{2}\) seasonality patterns being controlled by the water available the previous year, probably due to the speed of the forest's physiological responses to environmental changes in a given year. In a climate-change context with an increase in the frequency of extreme weather events, this information is important to inform public policies on environmental conservation that can be adopted by the Brazilian government to mitigate these effects on this type of environment. We conclude that the site behaves as a CO\({}_{2}\) sink, like other parts of the Amazon rainforest reported in the literature, with latent heat flux dominating energy partitioning throughout the year and marked seasonality in meteorological variables. The satellite estimates show low correlation with the in situ data, as found in other similar sites in the literature, indicating the need for adjustments to the satellite parameters to better capture the seasonality of carbon exchange at the site. NDVI and EVI patterns follow radiative availability, as does LAI, but without direct capture related to GPP data, which correlates better with satellite data only in the months with the highest LAI. Carbon accumulations are shown to be directly related to the previous year's rainfall at the site, with the intensity of capture varying according to the increase or decrease in precipitation accumulations. In a global context where there is a great call to value the standing forest due to its ecosystem services and the great profits that the bioeconomy can provide to the communities that depend on the forest, the results of this work serve as a basis for showing the importance of conserving the environment studied here as a tool for mitigating climate change.  
Conceptualization, M.P.A., R.A.S. and G.B.-C.; Methodology, C.M.S.e.S., B.G.B., K.R.M., M.L.B., R.A.S., L.V.P., A.S.d.S., W.B.M., I.M.S.R., M.C.d.R.S. and G.B.-C.; Software, M.L.B., H.G.G.C.N., W.B.M., M.C.d.R.S., A.B.d.S.G. and G.B.-C.; Validation, C.M.S.e.S., K.R.M., J.G.M.D.S., T.T.d.A.T.N., I.M.S.R., M.C.d.R.S., A.B.d.S.G. and G.B.-C.; Formal analysis, M.P.A., C.M.S.e.S., K.R.M., H.G.G.C.N., T.T.d.A.T.N., A.S.d.S., V.H.P.M., I.M.S.R. and W.P.; Investigation, M.P.A., B.G.B., K.R.M., J.G.M.D.S., T.T.d.A.T.N., A.S.d.S., W.P. and G.B.-C.; Resources, R.B.C.d.S., Data curation, L.V.P.; Writing--original draft, L.A.M., H.G.G.C.N., L.V.P. and P.O.; Writing--review & editing, C.M.S.e.S., B.G.B., L.A.M. and P.O.; Visualization, J.G.M.D.S. and V.H.P.M.; Supervision, G.B.-C.; Project administration, R.B.C.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.  
The authors are also thankful to the National Council for Scientifc and Technological Development (CNPq) for the research productivity grant of C.M.S.e.S. (Process n\({}^{\circ}\) 303802/2017-0), the undergraduate research project (PIBIC--CNPq--UFOPA for M.L.B.), the grant of Productivity and Technological Development Scholarship Program (PQDT-UFOPA) to G.B.-C., the financial support of PROPESP/UFPA (PAPQ) and Research Incentive Program--PIP (PPBIO-UFOPA).  
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.  
The authors declare no conflicts of interest, and the funders had no role in the design of the study.