## 3 Results  
The results regarding reliability analyses are summarized in Table 1. No systematic bias was present for any of the outcome measures. Relative reliability was good to excellent for the peak torque measures (ICC \(>\) 0.80) and acceptable for RTD measures (ICC = 0.5-0.8). Typical errors, expressed as coefficient of variation were low for peak torque measurements for adduction, abduction, and internal rotation, but higher (\(>\)10%) for external rotation, flexion, and extension, and for all RTD outcomes. This suggests that the predictive strength of the parameters related to hip strength in this study can be used on the level of a sample with high confidence, while the generalizability to an individual must be done with high caution. Inter-limb asymmetry values ranged from 0.76% for functional leg length up to 40.35% for RTD during hip flexion (Table 2). Inter-limb asymmetries of hip peak torque were lower (except for internal rotation) than the rate of torque development (3.68-11.52% vs. 10.72-40.35%, \(p<\) 0.05) (Table 3). Hip extension/flexion (1.32 \(\pm\) 0.33; 1.30 \(\pm\) 0.25), abduction/adduction (1.08 \(\pm\) 0.19; 1.07 \(\pm\) 0.20) and internal/external rotation (1.13 \(\pm\) 0.27; 1.18 \(\pm\) 0.26) ratios were similar (\(p>\) 0.05) for the left and right side (Table 4). Mean inter-limb asymmetry in peak torque during trunk lateral flexion exceeded the 10% threshold (12.48 \(\pm\) 9.61 %). Mean inter-limb asymmetry in hip ROM (5.91-13.54%), was above the 10% threshold for extension and internal/external rotations, while the trunk lateral flexion showed good symmetry (2.01 \(\pm\) 1.27%). Asymmetries in horizontal jumps showed lower results (3.48-4.60%) than various parameters of SLCMJ (4.77-11.12%). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Outcome/Task**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Repetition 1**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Repetition 2**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Systematic Bias**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Relative Reliability**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**Absolute Reliability**} \\ \cline{3-14} \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & **Mean** & **SD** & **Mean** & **SD** & **T** & **P** & **ICC** & **98\% CI for ICC** & **TE** & **CV** & **98\% CI for CV** \\ \hline \multirow{14}{*}{Peak torques at the hip (Nm)} & Hip Ablation–Left & 73.1 & 18.8 & 72.9 & 19.8 & 0.908 & 0.365 & 0.97 & 0.96 & 0.98 & 3.4 & 4.65 & 4.59 & 4.74 \\  & Hip Ablation–Right & 71.9 & 18.6 & 71.5 & 19.4 & 1.384 & 0.168 & 0.97 & 0.96 & 0.98 & 3.3 & 4.54 & 4.49 & 4.63 \\  & Hip Adduction–Left & 70.4 & 19.5 & 71.2 & 19.7 & -1.695 & 0.029 & 0.93 & 0.91 & 0.95 & 5.0 & 7.09 & 6.90 & 7.43 \\  & Hip Adduction–Right & 69.0 & 19.1 & 69.8 & 19.3 & -1.435 & 0.153 & 0.93 & 0.91 & 0.95 & 5.0 & 7.16 & 9.66 & 7.50 \\  & Hip Internal rotation–Left & 73.1 & 27.7 & 27.6 & 20.7 & 0.617 & 0.538 & 0.92 & 0.89 & 0.94 & 5.9 & 8.06 & 7.82 & 8.51 \\  & Hip Internal rotation–Right & 74.8 & 20.9 & 74.6 & 17.9 & -0.92 & 0.555 & 0.93 & 0.90 & 0.95 & 5.4 & 7.26 & 7.76 & 7.63 \\  & Hip External rotation–Left & 62.5 & 32.2 & 64.5 & 16.8 & 0.172 & 0.852 & 0.85 & 0.80 & 0.18 & 10.68 & 15.07 & 10.69 \\  & Hip External rotation–Right & 63.8 & 16.6 & 63.7 & 16.3 & -0.263 & 0.730 & 0.86 & 0.81 & 0.90 & 11.5 & 17.99 & 17.01 & 19.83 \\  & Hip Flexion–Left & 139.8 & 45.9 & 138.8 & 99.8 & -0.554 & 0.712 & 0.94 & 0.91 & 0.96 & 20.6 & 14.77 & 14.33 & 15.53 \\  & Hip Flexion–Right & 146.1 & 42.7 & 146.8 & 42.7 & -0.114 & 0.909 & 0.96 & 0.94 & 0.97 & 18.2 & 12.41 & 12.19 & 12.79 \\  & Hip Extension–Left & 163.7 & 17.5 & 160.9 & 55.2 & 1.195 & 0.234 & 0.87 & 0.88 & 27.8 & 17.13 & 15.99 & 19.30 \\  & Hip Extension–Right & 169.4 & 53.0 & 169.4 & 50.6 & -0.721 & 0.472 & 0.91 & 0.87 & 0.93 & 16.6 & 9.83 & 9.45 & 10.51 \\ \hline \multirow{14}{*}{Peak force at the trunk (N)} & Tumk extension & 594.5 & 199.2 & 560.3 & 190.7 & -3.50 & _0.001_ & 0.88 & 0.83 & 0.91 & 65.3 & 11.82 & 9.64 & 13.32 \\  & Tumk flexion & 415.5 & 144.2 & 431.0 & 144.9 & -4.016 & 0.00 & 0.94 & 0.91 & 0.96 & 33.5 & 7.91 & 5.42 & 9.11 \\  & Tumk hat.