## 3 Results
Similarly, a system error with the working frequency in the range (G5. Freq, G4. Freq) and not equal to G5. Freq is denoted as a G5 crosstalk error. As shown in Table 3, the G6 crosstalk error rate is 0.97%, and the G5 crosstalk error rate is 5.21%. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **Left Wire-S/ps** & **Mid Wire-S/ps** & **Right Wire-S/ps** & **Left Wire-R/ps** & **Mid Wire-R/ps** & **Right Wire-R/ps** \\ \hline (\(\downarrow\), \(\uparrow\), -) & 553 & 679 & - & 531 & 682 & - \\ (\(\uparrow\), \(\uparrow\)) & - & 679 & 553 & - & 682 & 531 \\ (\(\uparrow\), \(\downarrow\), -) & 519 & 736 & - & 514 & 701 & - \\ (\(\uparrow\), \(\downarrow\), \(\uparrow\)) & - & 373 & 519 & - & 701 & 514 \\ (\(\uparrow\), \(\downarrow\), \(\uparrow\)) & 492 & 909 & 492 & 487 & 874 & 496 \\ (\(\downarrow\), \(\uparrow\), \(\downarrow\)) & 535 & 854 & 535 & 513 & 857 & 522 \\ (\(\uparrow\), \(\downarrow\), \(\downarrow\)) & 529 & 529 & 304 & 524 & 494 & 282 \\ (\(\downarrow\), \(\downarrow\), \(\uparrow\)) & 304 & 529 & 529 & 282 & 494 & 524 \\ (\(\downarrow\), \(\uparrow\), \(\uparrow\)) & 566 & 489 & 282 & 544 & 492 & 277 \\ (\(\uparrow\), \(\uparrow\), \(\downarrow\)) & 282 & 489 & 566 & 277 & 492 & 544 \\ (\(\downarrow\), - \(\downarrow\)) & - & - & 386 & - & - & 364 \\ (\(\downarrow\), - \(\downarrow\)) & 386 & - & - & 364 & - & - \\ (\(\downarrow\), - \(\uparrow\)) & - & - & 359 & - & - & 354 \\ (\(\uparrow\), - \(\uparrow\)) & 359 & - & - & 354 & - & - \\ (\(\cdot\), \(\uparrow\), -) & - & 489 & - & - & 492 & - \\ (\(\cdot\), \(\downarrow\), -) & - & 531 & - & - & 496 & - \\ (\(\cdot\), - \(\cdot\), \(\cdot\)) & - & - & - & - & - & - \\ (\(\downarrow\), - \(\downarrow\)) & 362 & - & 362 & 340 & - & 340 \\ (\(\uparrow\), - \(\uparrow\)) & 331 & - & 331 & 326 & - & 326 \\ (\(\downarrow\), - \(\uparrow\)) & 412 & - & 382 & 390 & - & 377 \\ (\(\uparrow\), - \(\downarrow\)) & 382 & - & 412 & 377 & - & 390 \\ (\(\cdot\), \(\uparrow\), \(\uparrow\)) & 331 & 257 & - & 334 & 252 \\ (\(\uparrow\), \(\uparrow\), -) & 257 & 331 & - & 252 & 334 & - \\ (\(\cdot\), \(\downarrow\), \(\downarrow\)) & - & 359 & 271 & - & 324 & 249 \\ (\(\downarrow\), \(\downarrow\), \(\downarrow\)) & 271 & 359 & - & 249 & 324 & - \\ (\(\uparrow\), \(\uparrow\), \(\uparrow\)) & 233 & 233 & 233 & 228 & 236 & 228 \\ (\(\downarrow\), \(\downarrow\), \(\downarrow\)) & 256 & 256 & 234 & 221 & 234 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Wire delay spice and extraction results of SSTC on 28 nm nodes. In Table 6, we simulate the relationship between bandwidth and wire dimensions (spacing and length), which can be modified by the designer. A B1 rate means bandwidth improvement rates between the bandwidth, with the wire spacing changing and the original bandwidth with G6. Freq. B2 rate means bandwidth improvement rates between the bandwidth with G5. Freq and the bandwidth with G6. Freq under the same spacing. Table 6 shows that both the B1 rate and B2 rate increase with the decrease of wire spacing. However, with spacing decreasing, the maximum frequency is lower as well. The simulation results for the 28 nm node are similar to those for the 65 nm node. Generally, the reliability system has the possibility to break down when the occurring error is out of the design range. The breakdown phenomenon is called collision. In Table 7, (20,16) the CRC collision rate is simulated with different injection bit error rates. Table 7 shows that under G6 crosstalk error, the CRC has a 1.9\(\%\)\(\%\) chance to break down; under a G5 crosstalk error, the CRC has a 50.2\(\%\)\(\%\) chance to break down. Table 8 shows average sending times and collision times of RSHARQ with different error rates under 100,000 cycles of simulation. Under the G6 crosstalk error rate, RSHARQ has a 17.4\(\%\) cost to ensure data reliability. Under the G5 crosstalk error rate, RSHARQ has a 80.3\(\%\) cost to ensure data reliability.