## 3 Results and Discussion
### Survey Results: Pre-Use Experience and Expectations of Wearable Technology Products
In order to determine user experience in the during and after use phases, normality tests were carried out first, and an independent t-test was performed afterwards. There was no significant difference between the expectations of participants who had used wearable technology before (5.67, sd = 1.06) and participants who had not use wearable technology before (5.53, sd = 1.04) (t (372) =1252, \(p\) = 0.211). At the same time, comparison of the expectations of users who exercise regularly (5.61, sd = 1.066) and users who do not exercise regularly (5.43, sd = 1.197) had no significant difference (t (263) =1287, \(p\) = 0.199). As stated in the Methods Section, the results of the survey enabled us to identify the participants who would be included in the diary-interviews focused on the chest band and the smart T-shirt use experience. According to these results, we decided that regardless of the prior wearable technology experience, the diary-interview participants should still meet the inclusion criteria of regular exercise. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & **N** & **Mean** & **Std. Deviation** & **Variance** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Pragmatic} & \multirow{2}{*}{Wearability} & \multirow{2}{*}{No harm to body} & 371 & 6.429 & 1.227 & 1.505 \\  & & Mobility & 370 & 6.324 & 1.270 & 1.613 \\  & & Comfort & 374 & 6.267 & 1.363 & 1.859 \\  & & Thermal comfort & 371 & 6.267 & 1.297 & 1.683 \\  & & Easy cleaning & 373 & 6.257 & 1.250 & 1.563 \\  & & Easy doming, doffing & 374 & 6.246 & 1.272 & 1.618 \\  & & Fit & 371 & 6.151 & 1.315 & 1.729 \\  & & Heavy–size & 370 & 6.049 & 1.382 & 1.911 \\  & & Sensory adaptation & 371 & 5.722 & 1.493 & 2.228 \\  & & Accessory & 374 & 5.393 & 1.532 & 2.346 \\  & & Cloth & 369 & 5.344 & 1.496 & 2.237 \\ Usability & & Battery life & 370 & 6.454 & 1.166 & 1.360 \\  & & Data accuracy & 372 & 6.341 & 1.269 & 1.611 \\  & & Product performance & 369 & 6.282 & 1.223 & 1.496 \\  & & Response time & 374 & 6.235 & 1.238 & 1.532 \\  & & Self-use & 373 & 6.188 & 1.335 & 1.782 \\  & & Easy use & 372 & 6.121 & 1.269 & 1.611 \\  & & Understandable & 372 & 6.067 & 1.298 & 1.685 \\  & & Easy to learn & 371 & 6.065 & 1.338 & 1.790 \\  & & Feedback & 372 & 6.048 & 1.260 & 1.588 \\  & & Log time use & 371 & 6.272 & 1.167 & 1.361 \\  & & Intended use & 368 & 6.223 & 1.239 & 1.536 \\  & & User performance & 374 & 5.794 & 1.335 & 1.783 \\  & & User motivation & 374 & 5.767 & 1.371 & 1.879 \\ Hedonic & & Visual Aesthetic & High-quality looking & 374 & 5.447 & 1.579 & 2.494 \\  & & Creativity looking & 373 & 5.335 & 1.621 & 2.627 \\  & & Fashionable looking & 373 & 5.215 & 1.629 & 2.653 \\  & & Innovative looking & 371 & 5.043 & 1.735 & 3.009 \\  & & Impressive looking & 373 & 4.713 & 1.771 & 3.135 \\  & & Technological looking & 370 & 4.695 & 1.772 & 3.140 \\  & & Flashy looking & 374 & 4.072 & 1.868 & 3.488 \\  & & Expensive looking & 372 & 3.336 & 1.842 & 3.394 \\ Emotions & & Safety & 373 & 5.930 & 1.459 & 2.130 \\  & & Good & 370 & 5.773 & 1.510 & 2.279 \\  & & Happy & 372 & 5.583 & 1.631 & 2.659 \\  & & Joy & 373 & 5.421 & 1.622 & 2.631 \\  & & Cool & 374 & 5.185 & 1.697 & 2.880 \\ Social & & Personalization & 371 & 5.385 & 1.627 & 2.648 \\ Experience & & Makes feel different, unique & 374 & 4.997 & 1.766 & 3.118 \\  & & Attracting the attention of & 374 & 4.131 & 1.876 & 3.519 \\  & & other people & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: User expectation analysis.