## 4 Smart City Labeling: Case Studies on Matrix Testing
### SCM (Smart Cities Qualification Matrix) Testing  
As part of this aforementioned research process, the matrixes are being tested on real case studies. More specifically, a number of cities are being tested, both in the technologies they are using, and the concepts they manage in order to be considered Smart Cities. These cities are grouped in a unique platform called RECI (Spanish Smart Cities Network). Forty-one cities belong to this network all \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Technology**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**iiLUIX**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Type**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Perceive and Actuate**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & **a. User** & **b. Social** & **c. Urban** & **d. Environmental** & **e. Economic** & **f. Energy reqs.** & **Total** \\ \hline
1. Usefulness & 5 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 5 & **4.50** \\
2. Functionality & 4 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 4 & **4.00** \\
3. Applications & 5 & 4 & 5 & 4 & 4 & **5** & **4.50** \\
4. Expected results & 5 & 4 & 5 & 4 & 5 & 3 & **4.33** \\
5. Consequences & 5 & 4 & 5 & 5 & 5 & **4** & **4.67** \\
6. Advantages & 5 & 3 & 5 & 4 & 4 & **4** & **4.17** \\
7. Disadvantages & 5 & 4 & 5 & 4 & 4 & **4.33** \\
8. Risks/benefits & 4 & 3 & 5 & 4 & 4 & **3** & **3.83** \\
**Total** & **4.75** & **3.5** & **4.75** & **4.38** & **4.38** & **4.00** & **4.29** \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: TAM applied to ii LUIX. Figure 6: iiLUIX: how the system works [20]. around Spain: A Coruna, Alcobendas, Alcorcon, Alicante, Aranjuez, Avila, Badajoz, Barcelona, Burgos, Caceres, Castellon, Cordoba, Guadalajara, Elche, Gijon, Logrono, Lugo, Huesca, Madrid, Malaga, Marbella, Mostoles, Murcia, Oviedo, Palencia, Palma de Mallorca, Pamplona, Ponferrada, Rivas-Vaciamadrid, Salamanca, Santander, Segovia, Sevilla, Tarragona, Torrejon de Ardoz, Torrent, Valencia, Valladolid, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Sabadell y Zaragoza. This Network aims at the generation of a dynamic process between cities in order to have a \"Spanish network of Smart Cities\", which will promote automatic and efficient management of infrastructure and urban services, reduce public spending improve the quality of services, attract economic activity, and facilitate overall progress [21]. The current research project focuses specifically on Pamplona and its Smart City strategy [22], which we will attempt to test with the developed matrix called SCM. Regarding the strategy of the city of Pamplona, the city council has posed the following objectives for these different areas. Some of them are now being implemented:  
Administrative procedures:  
* (T01) Apps for citizen Smartphones;
* (T02) E-Government: transparency and easy management;
* (T03) Interoperability and transversality: by web and for citizens. Infrastructures:  
* (T04) Free Wi-Fi in the city: 26 hot spots;
* (T05) Integrated fare system for citizens: Citizen card;
* (T06) Internet of Things: centralized digital management. Environment
* (T07) CO2 Sensors system;
* (T08) Efficient and ecologic Public transport;
* (T09) Car sharing;
* (T10) Biodiversity (QR codification in urban landscape). Public Safety and Traffic:  
* (T11) Car plate detecting systems for traffic control;
* (T12) Signalling and sensorizing Parking lots;
* (T13) Pedestrian lighting to improve security and safety. Maintenance:  
* (T14) Building energy management;
* (T15) Provide PDA systems to inspector for alert management;
* (T16) Intelligent urban lighting systems. As could be seen in the next Matrix (Table 5), after evaluating each technology (Table 6) and obtaining their score, area weighing can be made, depending on the different aspects they could try to solve: mobility (m), energy (e) and quality of life (q). A few examples are shown:With this work system, each technology is evaluated and weighted, in order to obtain a final labeling for the Pamplona Smart City strategy.