# Behind the Door: Practical Parameterization of Propagation Parameters for IEEE 802.11 ad Use Cases  
[PERSON]  
1 Escuela de Informatica y Telecomunicaciones, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago 8320000, Chile; [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (E.C. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (A.A.); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (D.D. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (P.P.J.) 2  
[PERSON]  
1 Escuela de Informatica y Telecomunicaciones, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago 8320000, Chile; [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (E.C. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (A.A.); [PERSON]S] (D.D. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (P.P.J.) 2  
[PERSON]  
1 Escuela de Informatica y Telecomunicaciones, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago 8320000, Chile; [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (E.C. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (A.A.); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (D.D. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (P.P.J.) 3  
[PERSON]  
1 Escuela de Informatica y Telecomunicaciones, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago 8320000, Chile; [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (E.C. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (A.A.); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (D.D. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (P.P.J.) 2  
[PERSON]  
1 Escuela de Informatica y Telecomunicaciones, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago 8320000, Chile; [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (E.C. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (A.A.); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (D.D. ); [EMAIL_ADDRESS] (P.P.J.) 2  
Footnote 1: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 2: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 3: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 4: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 5: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 6: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 7: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 8: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 9: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 10: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 11: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 12: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 13: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 14: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 15: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
Footnote 16: email: {[EMAIL_ADDRESS], pel. ; Tel. : +56-9-9779-2920}  
pointing strategies, as described in [8], offer an interesting approach. Although these strategies increase the burden of coordination on the system, they also amplify losses induced by minor pointing errors. Recent advances in wireless mm-wave propagation have explored various environmental configurations; however, these studies have largely overlooked the combined impact of pedestrians and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) links, which more accurately reflect real-world wireless channel conditions. In reference [9], the authors present large-scale path loss models and temporal statistics derived from indoor measurement campaigns conducted using rotating horn-type directional antennas operating at 28 GHz and 73 GHz frequencies. Although this study establishes a channel model for a stationary office environment close to APs and STAs, it does not address the effects of pedestrian obstruction, which can lead to intermittent signal disruptions over time. These disruptions pose a significant challenge, particularly considering the high transmission rates characteristic of such links, which often reach gigabits per second (Gbps). To bridge this gap, our research efforts involve measuring temporal and angular variations in received power with and without the presence of individuals near the antennas. The authors in [6] describe a measurement experiment in a living room, also called indoor-to-indoor (I2I), over the 60 GHz channel using 20 dBi directional antennas at the same height. They investigated the impact of moving pedestrians in a setup composed of a single pedestrian traveling across the link over a small number of crossing locations and measured the data transmission loss.