## 3 Results
### FI (\(\%\)) and Sdec (\(\%\))  
Table 6 demonstrates no significant differences between RST2M and RST40S for FI (\(\%\)) (4.61 \(\pm\) 2.20 vs. 3.92 \(\pm\) 2.54, \(p\) \(>\) 0.05) and Sdec (\(\%\)) (2.17 \(\pm\) 1.02 vs. 1.17 \(\pm\) 1.05\(\%\), \(p\) \(>\) 0.05).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Sprint** \\ **Variables** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{**Group**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**M**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**SE**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**95\% CI**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**ANOVA**} \\ \cline{3-10}  & & & & **LL** & & **UL** & & **Group** & **Trial** & **Group \(\times\) Trial** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Sprint time [s]} & RST2M & 0.82 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.003 & 0.823 & 0.836 & \(p\) & 0.584 & 0.998 & 0.878 \\  & RST40S & 0.82 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.003 & 0.821 & 0.834 & \(p\) & 0.301 & 0.051 & 0.355 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Peak speed [m/s]} & RST2M & 6.49 \(\pm\) 0.26 & 0.028 & 6.426 & 6.541 & \(p\) & 0.697 & 0.990 & 0.559 \\  & RST40S & 6.50 \(\pm\) 0.25 & 0.027 & 6.443 & 6.555 & \(p\) & 0.152 & 0.109 & 0.789 \\  & RST2M & 160.23 \(\pm\) 6.73 & 0.714 & 158.281 & 161.105 & \(p\) & 0.880 & 0.904 & 0.486 \\  & RST40S & 160.00 \(\pm\) 6.39 & 0.678 & 158.198 & 160.889 & \(p\) & 0.003 & 0.314 & 0.850 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Peak power [W]} & RST2M & 1029.43 \(\pm\) 78.26 & 8.296 & 1007.917 & 1041.745 & \(p\) & 0.896 & 0.952 & 0.503 \\  & RST40S & 1031.25 \(\pm\) 73.98 & 7.843 & 1010.556 & 1042.209 & \(p\) & 0.007 & 0.027 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{AvgStep length [m]} & RST2M & 1.37 \(\pm\) 0.06 & 0.007 & 1.355 & 1.382 & \(p\) & 0.693 & 0.856 & 1.000 \\  & RST40S & 1.37 \(\pm\) 0.06 & 0.007 & 1.358 & 1.386 & \(p\) & 0.156 & 0.389 & 0.009 \\  & RST2M & 4.41 \(\pm\) 0.21 & 0.022 & 4.369 & 4.463 & \(p\) & 0.944 & 0.852 & 0.944 \\  & RST40S & 4.40 \(\pm\) 0.21 & 0.022 & 4.367 & 4.460 & \(p\) & 0.005 & 0.012 & 0.241 \\  & RST40S & 4.40 \(\pm\) 0.21 & 0.022 & 4.367 & 4.460 & \(p^{2}\) & 0.000 & 0.395 & 0.008 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 4: Group \(\times\) Trial differences in resisted sprint performance and mechanical variables at 10–15 m.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{
\begin{tabular}{c} **Sprint** \\ **Variables** \\ \end{tabular} } & \multirow{2}{*}{**Group**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**M**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**SE**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**95\% CI**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**ANOVA**} \\ \cline{3-10}  & & & & **LL** & & **UL** & **Group** & **Trial** & **Group \(\times\) Trial** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Sprint time [s]} & RST2M & 0.80 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.004 & 0.793 & 0.809 & \(p\) & 0.664 & 0.992 & 0.474 \\  & RST40S & 0.79 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.004 & 0.791 & 0.806 & \(p\) & 0.189 & 0.100 & 0.913 \\  & RST40S & 0.79 \(\pm\) 0.03 & 0.004 & 0.791 & 0.806 & \(p^{2}\) & 0.000 & 0.005 & 0.030 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Peak speed [m/s]} & RST2M & 6.63 \(\pm\) 0.28 & 0.030 & 6.558 & 6.677 & \(p\) & 0.474 & 0.997 & 0.366 \\  & RST40S & 6.66 \(\pm\) 0.25 & 0.027 & 6.593 & 6.702 & \(p^{2}\) & 0.003 & 0.002 & 0.034 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Peak force [N]} & RST2M & 159.50 \(\pm\) 6.73 & 0.714 & 157.518 & 160.310 & \(p\) & 0.631 & 0.748 & 0.251 \\  & RST40S & 159.83 \(\pm\) 6.15 & 0.652 & 158.084 & 160.668 & \(p\) & 0.232 & 0.536 & 1.337 \\  & RST2M & 1055.14 \(\pm\) 79.16 & 8.391 & 1031.358 & 1063.856 & \(p\) & 0.492 & 0.954 & 0.174 \\  & RST40S & 1060.45 \(\pm\) 68.78 & 7.291 & 1040.713 & 1069.591 & \(p\) & 0.473 & 0.220 & 1.562 \\  & RST2M & 1.49 \(\pm\) 0.08 & 0.009 & 1.473 & 1.510 & \(p\) & 0.185 & 0.125 & 0.879 \\  & RST40S & 1.50 \(\pm\) 0.08 & 0.009 & 1.491 & 1.527 & \(p\) & 1.773 & 1.757 & 0.355 \\  & RST2M & 4.22 \(\pm\) 0.26 & 0.028 & 4.164 & 4.282 & \(p\) & 0.012 & 0.053 & 0.012 \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{AvgStep frequency [Hz]} & RST2M & 4.22 \(\pm\) 0.26 & 0.028 & 4.164 & 4.282 & \(p\) & 0.345 & 0.265 & 0.915 \\  & RST40S & 4.18 \(\pm\) 0.25 & 0.027 & 4.127 & 4.241 & \(p^{2}\) & 0.006 & 0.040 & 0.009 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}  
\(\;