# Optimization of DC Energy Storage in Tokamak Poloidal Coils
## 8 Simulation Campaign
### Results in Terms of Layout and Dimensions
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**1 MW**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**2 MW**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**3 MW**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Independent**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Shared**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Independent**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Shared**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Independent**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Shared**} \\ \cline{2-7}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**DC Links**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**DC Links**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**DC Links**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**DC Links**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**DC Links**} \\ \hline
**PF1** & \begin{tabular}{c} 14 cabinets \\ (1 \(\times\) 14) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 24 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 12) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 12 cabinets \\ (1 \(\times\) 12) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 14 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 7) \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 9 cabinets \\ (1 \(\times\) 9) \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 12 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 6) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
**PF2** & \begin{tabular}{c} 28 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 14) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 28 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 14) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 20 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 10) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 14 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 22) \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 14 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 7) \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 32 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 16) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
**PF3** & \begin{tabular}{c} 22 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 11) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 48 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 24) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 20 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 10) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 14 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 22) \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 14 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 7) \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 32 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 16) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
**PF4** & \begin{tabular}{c} 26 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 13) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} (2 \(\times\) 16) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 44 cabinets \\ (1 \(\times\) 25) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 40 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 20) \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 40 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 20) \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 20 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 10) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
**PF5** & \begin{tabular}{c} 44 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 22) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 32 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 16) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 24 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 16) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 40 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 22) \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 24 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 20) \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 24 cabinets \\ (2 \(\times\) 10) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline
**PF6** & \begin{tabular}{c} 32 cabinets \\ (1 \(\times\) 32) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} (2 \(\times\) 16) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 25 cabinets \\ (1 \(\times\) 25) \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} (2 \(\times\) 12) \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 22 cabinets \\ (1 \(\times\) 22) \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} (2 \(\times\) 10) \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Comparison between the size, expressed in terms of number of reference cabinets and \(N_{\text{g}}\times N_{\text{p}}\), of SC banks in the case of shared and independent DC storage.