## 4 Case Study and Discussion
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Case**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**20\% Reduction in the Generation of CPPs Replaced by 1000 MW (Rated Power) Wind Farm**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**30\% Reduction in the Generation of CPPs Replaced by 1000 MW (Rated Power) Wind Farm**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**30\% Reduction in the Generation of CPPs Replaced by 1000 MW (Rated Power) Wind Farm**} \\ \cline{2-2} \cline{6-11}  & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline LOLE [hours per year] & **0.70** & **0.70** & 0.29 & 0.81 & 0.84 & **49.26** & **49.18** & 48.92 & 50.13 & 49.45 \\ \hline LOLP & **0.00114** & **0.00114** & 0.00057 & 0.00125 & 0.00159 & **0.01027** & 0.00958 & 0.00890 & **0.01073** & 0.01152 \\ \hline EENS [MWh] & **0.77** & **0.85** & 0.07 & 0.94 & 1.59 & 90.21 & 87.90 & 66.38 & 105.88 & 122.57 \\ \hline EENS cost [USD] & \begin{tabular}{c} **2.69 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **2.98\(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 2.98\(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 2.6 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 3.30 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 5.57 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **3.15 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{5}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **3.07 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{5}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 2.32 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{5}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 3.70 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{5}\)** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 4.29 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{5}\)** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Reliability & **0.99993** & 0.99992 & 0.99999 & **0.99993** & 0.99990 & **0.99920** & **0.99920** & 0.99933 & 0.99919 & 0.99897 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Comparison of the system performance with various uncertainty modeling techniques for modeling the uncertainty of wind farming (1-month uncertainty) and with the reductions of 20% and 30% in the generation of CPPs. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Case**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**20\% Reduction in the Generation of CPPs Replaced by 1000 MW (Rated Power) Wind Farm**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**30\% Reduction in the Generation of CPPs Replaced by 1000 MW (Rated Power) Wind Farm**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**30\% Reduction in the Generation of CPPs Replaced by 1000 MW (Rated Power) Wind Farm**} \\ \cline{2-2} \cline{6-11}  & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline LOLE [hours per year] & **0.70** & **0.70** & 0.29 & 0.81 & 0.84 & **49.26** & **49.18** & 48.92 & 50.13 & 49.45 \\ \hline LOLP & **0.00114** & **0.00114** & 0.00057 & 0.00125 & 0.00159 & **0.01027** & 0.00958 & 0.00890 & **0.01073** & 0.01152 \\ \hline EENS [MWh] & **0.77** & **0.85** & 0.07 & 0.94 & 1.59 & 90.21 & 87.90 & 66.38 & 105.88 & 122.57 \\ \hline EENS cost [USD] & \begin{tabular}{c} **2.69 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **2.98\(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 2.98\(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 2.6 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 3.30 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 5.57 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **3.15 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **3.07 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} 2.32 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 3.70 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{3}\)** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} 4.29 \(\times\)** \\ **10\({}^{5}\)** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Reliability & **0.99993** & **0.99992** & 0.99998 & **0.99992** & 0.99988 & **0.99920** & **0.99922** & 0.99940 & 0.99912 & 0.99898 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}