###### Abstract
[24] reported an improved sustainability by reducing the construction waste from 10-15%, site visits to 70%, site disruption or noise pollution from 30-50%, and onsite accidents above 80%. Additionally, it was found to lower the environmental impacts by reducing the material wastage to 64%, greenhouse gas emissions to 40% [25], and economic implications by reducing the production hours to 31% [26]. A comparative study concludes that a reduction in the economic impact can be achieved by saving 60% of steel, 77% of the framework [27], and reducing the resource depletion to 36%, a social influence by limiting the health damage to 6.6%, the environmental impact by reducing the ecosystem damage to 3.5%, and economic implications by the reduction in the energy consumption to 20% [28]. It can be concluded that PFIC can increase the productivity, efficiency, and safety while decreasing the number of onsite visits,  
Figure 1: Traditional onsite vs. prefabricated industrial steel construction. transport activities, material wastage, noise pollution, energy consumption, hazardous gas emissions, and reliance on unskilled labor. The critical advantage originates from its quick fabrication; this can reduce the construction time by 30-50% compared to conventional construction. In China, broad sustainable building (BSB) was pioneered with the T30 tower [29] in 15 days and the J57 tower [30] in 19 days. The 60-story Collins house, 44-story Atira student accommodation, and La Trobe towers in Australia are the tallest panelized PFISB skyscrapers [31]. The 44-story Croydon tower [32], 32-story B2 tower [33], 29-story Apex [34], and SOHO tower [35] are high-rise volumetric PFISB skyscrapers using PFIC. By developing the two fastest temporary hospitals, i.e., Huoshenshan and Leishenshan, within 6-10 days in Wuhan, China, the PFIC method has fully achieved its goal of being an environmentally friendly, speedy, and dynamic form of construction [36; 37]. The review is primarily concerned with researching the comparatively most adaptable recent technological advancements, structural measures, and stability systems, or research solutions in terms of the sustainability, workability, and performance in the event of an earthquake, wind, fire, blast, vibrations, and progressive collapse to meet the design and safety requirements. Furthermore, this study lists the limitations of these technologies. It introduces some solutions or opportunities that should be investigated to address all of the technical issues not addressed in previously developed solutions to improve the adaptability of PFISB in high-rise buildings. It is because, due to the strict requirements set forth by the construction industry, PFISC is only used in a few high-rise PFISB projects, despite its many benefits. This is due to unfamiliarity with or lacking detailed and comprehensive content on the most recent and relevant technological and research advancements with new potential research solutions [33; 38; 39; 40; 41]. The study investigated that upon resolving the above-noticed technical challenges, the adaptability of PFISBs in high-rise PFISC applications can be increased [42]. As a result, the present study will look at (i) the recent technological developments and their structural performances, (ii) the limitations and technical challenges and constraints offered by these advancements, and (iii) the potential future research solutions, measures, and opportunities to address these technical issues. This paper analyzes and thoroughly researches contemporary breakthroughs in the structures of PFISBs, the structural performances, difficulties, and growth expectations. The study's findings are intended to encourage the expansion of PFISC as a resource for professionals, academics, and specialists.