## 4 Survey Findings and Results from and Through Discussion
### Statistical Criteria: Correlations  
According to the performed correlation analysis, the survey findings and results showed that there is a statistically significant positive correlation with the essential parameters that essentially concern the interactive radio-themed lesson (i.e., the parameters of the \"organization\", \"interesting suggestions\", \"development issues\", and \"educational tools and services\"), something that can be considered as the informal success of the interactive audiovisual-supported lesson plan (Section 3.1) by the budding journalists (Table 17). Notably, a statistically significant positive correlation is observed between (a) the parameter of the \"organization\" and the parameter of the \"interesting suggestions\" (r = 0.365, \(p<0.01\)) (Table 17); and (b) the parameter of the \"development issues\" and the parameter of the \"interesting suggestions\" (r = 0.362, \(p<0.01\)) (Table 17). Likewise, there is a low yet positive correlation between (a) the parameter of the \"development issues\" and the parameter of the \"organization\" (r = 0.293, \(p<0.01\)) (Table 17); (b) the parameter of the \"educational tools and services\" and the parameter of the \"interesting suggestions\" (r = 0.286, \(p<0.01\)) (Table 17); (c) the parameter of the \"educational tools and services\" and the parameter of the \"development issues\" (r = 0.244, \(p<0.01\)) (Table 17); and (d) the parameter of the \"educational tools and services\" and the parameter of the \"organization\" (r = 0.201, \(p<0.05\)) (Table 17). To summarize, it would be very interesting if all the above parameters had a statistically significant positive correlation to each other because it would allow advanced data analysis methods to be applied [191] that would present possible analytical modeling of the interactive audiovisual-supported lesson plan (Section 3.1), thus providing it a further validity than that which had already emerged in Section 4.2.3. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Educational Tools and Services**} & **N** & **Mean** & **SD** & **t** & **df** & **Sig.** \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Survey Phases**} & First Survey Phase & 93 & 4.20 & 0.841 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)3.869} & \multirow{2}{*}{133} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.001} \\  & Second Survey Phase & 43 & 4.74 & 0.445 & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Survey Parts**} & First Survey Part & 62 & 4.18 & 0.897 & \multirow{2}{*}{\(-\)2.712} & \multirow{2}{*}{133} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.087} \\  & Second Survey Part & 73 & 4.53 & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 16: Survey findings and results of the statistical analysis from independent samples \(t\)-test in relation to the two unexpected survey phases and the two survey parts based on “educational tools and services”. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Expectations**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Organization**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Interesting**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Decision**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Decision**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Decision**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Time**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Venne**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Period**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Tools and**} \\ \hline
**Expectations** & \begin{tabular}{c} Pearson \\ Correlation \\ \end{tabular}  & 1 & 0.327 \({}^{**}\) & 0.361 \({}^{**}\) & 0.180 \({}^{*}\) & 0.211 \({}^{*}\) & 0.109 & 0.279 \({}^{**}\) & 0.256 \({}^{**}\) & 0.197 \({}^{*}\) & 0.249 \({}^{**}\) & 0.217 \({}^{*}\) \\  & Sig.