## 4 Results and Discussion
This approach is particularly effective in the AHP for synthesizing individual judgments, as it balances out the variances in individual survey responses, leading to a more representative and robust consensus weight. To further validate the consistency of our AHP analysis, we computed the _CI_, _CR_, and \(\lambda_{\text{max}}\) for each individual survey and then calculated their geometric mean method [117,118]. This method offers a comprehensive view of consistency across all individual assessments, rather than relying on a single survey's data. For a matrix size of \(n=3\), the average _CI_ across the surveys was calculated to be 0.016. The _CR_, when compared against an _RI_ of 0.58, was determined to be 0.031. Additionally, the average \(\lambda_{\text{max}}\) was found to be 3.031. The fact that the _CR_ value is well below the widely accepted threshold of 0.1 indicates a high level of consistency in the surveyor ratings used in our study. This significantly strengthens the reliability and credibility of our findings, providing a robust foundation for the conclusions drawn from our AHP analysis. In the results presented in Table 7, which delve into the manufacturing of 5G ceramic antennas, we utilized the AHP to meticulously evaluate and assign weights to various sub-factors within the 'Subject' top factor category. This analysis is crucial for understanding the hierarchical significance of each sub-factor's contribution to the manufacturing process. According to the B-SER-M model analysis, the sub-factors of 'Subject' include the 'Manufacturing Company', 'Supply Chain Partner', 'Quality Verifier', and 'Technical Service Provider'. The 'Manufacturing Company' is the entity primarily responsible for producing the final product. In the realm of 5G ceramic antennas, these companies oversee the actual manufacturing and assembly processes, employing various resources to produce the final antennas. The 'Supply Chain Partner' refers to any entity that manages the logistics and \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Top Factor** & **Weight** & **Rank** & _CI_ & _CR_ & \(\lambda_{\text{max}}\) \\ \hline Subject & 0.465 & 1 & & & \\ Environment & 0.225 & 3 & 0.016 & 0.031 & 3.031 \\ Resource & 0.310 & 2 & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 6: The AHP results for the primary dimensions or top-level factors in the context of 5G ceramic antenna manufacturing. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c} \hline \hline
**Sub-Factors** & **Rank** & **Weight** \\ \hline Manufacturing Company & 1 & 0.443 \\ Supply Chain Partner & 4 & 0.112 \\ Quality Verifier & 3 & 0.129 \\ Technical Service Provider & 2 & 0.316 \\ \hline SUM & & 1.000 \\ \hline _CI_ & & 0.028 \\ _CR_ & & 0.031 \\ _\(\lambda_{\text{max}}\)_ & & 4.084 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: The AHP calculated weights for sub-factors under the top-level factor of ‘Subject’ in the context of 5G ceramic antenna manufacturing. delivery of materials and parts essential for manufacturing. In the production of 5G ceramic antennas, such partners may encompass providers of raw materials, components, and logistics services, all ensuring the timely and efficient provision of the necessities for production. A 'Quality Verifier' is tasked with ensuring that products adhere to specific standards and specifications. In the manufacturing of 5G ceramic antennas, quality verifiers perform inspections and testing on the antennas to confirm their compliance with performance, safety, and regulatory benchmarks. This role may involve both internal quality management teams and external certification agencies. A 'Technical Service Provider' is a specialist offering technical expertise and support. For the manufacturing of 5G ceramic antennas, these providers may offer consultation on design and engineering, assistance in resolving production issues, or guidance in optimizing manufacturing processes for better efficiency and quality.