## 5 Case Study  
### Selection of Ground Motion Records  
The probabilistic method defined by [PERSON] was used to calculate seismic hazard in the city of Tijuana [41]. Data processing was carried out using the EPPS14 program [31; 42], which wasdeveloped in the Matlab language. The linear sources used in the EPPS14 program represent faults or fault segments in the region based on the segmentation proposed by [PERSON] et al. and [PERSON] [42; 43]. These correspond to active faults with the potential to generate significant magnitude earthquakes that could affect civil structures. The points of interest where this method was applied were within the city of Tijuana, specifically at the locations of stations that make up the Tijuana Strong-Motion Network. The stations include PR = Presa Abelardo L. Rodriguez, TUN = Tanque Aguaje de la Tuna, COL = Tanque Cerro Colorado, PLA = Planta de Tratamiento Playas, PCI = TerrenoProteccion Civil, and CCC = Centro Control, Comando y Computo de la Policia (Table 2). Using EPPS14, seismic hazard disaggregation was determined for each site of interest. A summary of the results for each of the sites is presented in Table 3. The results obtained, considering the linear sources and the calculation of the uniform hazard spectrum at each specific site, were used for the selection of records based on tectonic setting, magnitude, and distance. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Station Name** & **Earthquake** & **Origin Date** & **Magnitude** & **Distance (km)** & **PGA (g)** & **V\({}_{\textbf{x0}}\)** \\ \hline WRC2 & SearlesValley & 5/07/2019 & 5.0 Mw & 26.2 & 0.355 & 686 \\
13879 & La Habra & 28/03/2014 & 5.1 Mw & 8.3 & 0.307 & 283 \\
36138 & Parkfield & 28/09/2004 & 6.0 MI & 10.7 & 0.308 & 270 \\
68150 (Chn 1) & South Napa & 24/08/2014 & 6.0 Mw & 6.4 & 0.339 & 300 \\
57191 & MorganHill84 & 24/04/1984 & 6.2 MI & 3.9 & 0.314 & 282 \\
24643 & Northridge & 17/01/1994 & 6.4 MI & 20.1 & 0.320 & 258 \\
36431 & Parkfield & 20/12/1994 & 4.9 Mw & 7.5 & 0.433 & 297 \\ WMD & Westmorland & 30/09/2020 & 4.9 Mw & 2.1 & 0.538 & 301 \\ CLC & Searles Valley & 5/07/2019 & 5.0 Mw & 10.8 & 0.511 & 1464 \\
11369 & Westmorland & 27/04/1981 & 5.7 Mw & 6.9 & 0.480 & 194 \\
36228 & Parkfield & 28/09/2004 & 6.0 MI & 11.9 & 0.600 & 173 \\
36410 & Parkfield & 28/09/2004 & 6.0 MI & 12.3 & 0.570 & 231 \\
24386 & Northridge & 17/01/1994 & 6.4 MI & 6.6 & 0.450 & 284 \\
14125 & Inglewood & 17/05/2009 & 4.7 Mw & 21.8 & 0.290 & 334 \\
57187 & Livermore80B & 26/01/1980 & 5.8 MI & 20.4 & 0.280 & 378 \\
36445 & Parkfield & 28/09/2004 & 6.0 MI & 15.2 & 0.141 & 308 \\
24283 & Northridge & 17/01/1994 & 6.4 MI & 32.5 & 0.290 & 342 \\
24592 & Northridge & 17/01/1994 & 6.4 MI & 38.2 & 0.260 & 365 \\
13068 & Chino Hills & 29/07/2008 & 5.4 Mw & 10.4 & 0.270 & 485 \\
13873 & Chino Hills & 29/07/2008 & 5.4 Mw & 12.4 & 0.260 & 396 \\ CCC & Searles Valley & 3/06/2020 & 5.5 Mw & 11.5 & 0.260 & 432 \\
89101 & Petrolia & 22/06/2019 & 5.6 Mw & 5.8 & 0.300 & 422 \\ KCO & Petrolia & 22/06/2019 & 5.6 Mw & 3.8 & 0.270 & – \\
12204 & Palm Springs86 & 08/07/1986 & 6.0 Mw & 33.7 & 0.240 & 447 \\
36520 (Chn 1) & Parkfield & 28/09/2004 & 6.0 MI & _7.7_ & 0.290 & 467 \\
36520 (Chn 3) & Parkfield & 28/09/2004 & 6.0 MI & _7.7_ & 0.290 & 467 \\
24464 & Northridge & 17/01/1994 & 6.4 MI & 18.5 & 0.320 & 464 \\
57217 & CoyoteLake & 6/08/1979 & 5.7 MI & 2.1 & 0.250 & 561 \\
36437 (Chn 1) & Parkfield & 28/09/2004 & 6.0 MI & 9.5 & 0.192 & 565 \\
36437 (Chn 3) & Parkfield & 28/09/2004 & 6.0 MI & 9.5 & 0.199 & 565 \\
54171 (Chn 1) & ChalfantValley & 21/07/1986 & 6.4 MI & 21 & 0.170 & 522 \\
54171 (Chn 3) & ChalfantValley & 21/07/1986 & 6.4 MI & 21 & 0.250 & 522 \\ CLC & Ridgecrest & 4/07/2019 & 6.4 Mw & 14.8 & 0.192 & 1464 \\
57562 & Loma Prieta & 17/10/1989 & 6.9 MI & 20.5 & 0.160 & 648 \\
57563 (Chn 1) & Loma Prieta & 17/10/1989 & 6.9 MI & 20.3 & 0.270 & 648 \\
57563 (Chn 3) & Loma Prieta & 17/10/1989 & 6.9 MI & 20.3 & 0.230 & 648 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}