## 3 Results and Discussion
### Evaluation Results of the Failure/Loss Ratios of Respective Performance Criteria of SPRG  
A comprehensive representation of the overall changes to the waterproofing performance and property changes to the SPRG when subject to screw mixing and extended storage, and the ratios of the respective performance properties obtained from Section 3.2, Table 6, are outlined below. The failure ratios were calculated from the averaged rate results between the five specimens. The respective failure or loss ratios of viscosity and waterproofing performance were averaged to derive a comprehensive deviancy ratio per screw-mixing time at different storage periods. Tables 7-11 provide details. With the increase in the screw-mixing time, the percentage of deformation ratio with respect to viscosity and waterproofing performance were also shown to increase. While NSM condition SPRG specimens had the lowest deformation percentage ratio, minimal screw mixing is still required for SPRG to be used in construction sites. Based on the results of this demonstration evaluation, a recommended screw-mixing time of 10-min of less can be proposed. Next, a set of radar charts in Figure 13 was derived based on the results of the viscosity measurement and the four waterproofing performance test results. In this case, the comparison was derived based on different screw-mixing time conditions, and lines distributed based on different storage conditions, to visually represent the degree of performance recovery of (1) viscosity and (2) waterproofing performance throughout the storage period after screw mixing. The axes of the radar charts were all designated so that higher values represent a greater degree of deviation or deformation for the purpose of a facilitated visual comparison. Each of the performance failure ratios derived from Section 3.2 formed an axis on the radar charts and the values were plotted respectively. Figure 13 provides details. When visually represented with the radar graphs, the difference in the recovery of viscosity and waterproofing performance was clear between different screw-mixing times throughout the storage periods. In the case of up to 20 min of screw-mixing time, the viscosity and waterproofing performances recovery by the seventh day of storage was fair, as the data on the deviation were closer \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Degradation Factors**} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{**Ratio per Screw Mixing Time (\%)**} \\ \cline{2-6}  & **NSM** & **10 min** & **20 min** & **30 min** & **60 min** \\ \hline Viscosity loss ratio (\(V_{l}\)) & 2 & 2 & 29 & 41 & 56 \\ Mass loss ratio (\(W_{l}\)) & 34 & 27 & 33 & 73 & 93 \\ Adhesion failure ratio (\(T_{f}\)) & 0 & 1.5 & 1.5 & 0 & 62 \\ Impermeability failure ratio (\(T_{jf}\)) & 0 & 1 & 35 & 50 & 63 \\ Impermeability failure ratio after SMRT 1 (\(T_{smf}\)) & 0 & 25 & 42 & 72 & 100 \\ Averaged deviancy from expected performance & 7.2 & 11.3 & 28.1 & 47.2 & 74.8 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \({}^{1}\) Substrate movement resistance testing.  
\end{table} 
Table 10: Estimation of the deviancy from the expected performance of SPRG (3 days storage). \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Degradation Factors**} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{**Ratio per Screw Mixing Time (\%)**} \\ \cline{2-6}  & **NSM** & **10 min** & **20 min** & **30 min** & **60 min** \\ \hline Viscosity loss ratio (\(V_{l}\)) & 1 & 1 & 42 & 42 & 56 \\ Mass loss ratio (\(W_{l}\)) & 32 & 33 & 33 & 53 & 73 \\ Adhesion failure ratio (\(T_{f}\)) & 0 & 2 & 2 & 0 & 72 \\ Impermeability failure ratio (\(T_{jf}\)) & 0 & 2 & 0 & 47 & 43 \\ Impermeability failure ratio after SMRT 1 (\(T_{smf}\)) & 0 & 17 & 25 & 52 & 83 \\ Averaged deviancy from expected performance & 6.6 & 11 & 20.4 & 38.8 & 65.4 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \({}^{1}\) Substrate movement resistance testing.  
\end{table} 
Table 11: Estimation of the deviancy from the expected performance of SPRG (7 days storage).