## 3 Results  
A total of 157 CBCT scans were initially reviewed, out of which 65 fulfilled all inclusion criteria and were selected for detailed morphometric assessment. The interclass correlation coefficient was determined for the variables which were measured from the same points but among different teeth. In Table 1, we provide the interclass correlations with 95% confidence intervals, along with the mean differences between the two examiners that performed measurements of the variables of interest. We grouped measurements into four groups based on the similarity of the measurement points: contact point (CP), ideal implant points (IPPs), interdental width (IDW), and buccalalal depth (BPD). All measurements showed excellent reliability (ICC value > 0.9). Demographics and Group Classification  
Among the 65 participants who met the eligibility requirements, 23 were male (35.4%) and 42 were female (64.6%), as shown in Table 1. The distribution of genders was considered adequate for evaluating clinically relevant parameters across both sexes. The average age of the included individuals was 29.83 \(\pm\) 11.14 years. For comparative purposes, the patients were divided into four age-based categories. The descriptive presentation of the subjects included in the analysis is presented in Table 2.  
Figure 7: Methodological workflow of this study. Statistical Differences Between the Groups  
Statistically significant differences between age categories were identified for multiple variables, including BPD at level D in regio 2\({}^{\prime}\), and IDW at level D in regio 1, as well as levels C and D in regio 2\({}^{\prime}\). Variations related to age were also noted in the linear distances from the IPP: specifically, C1-IPP measurements in regio 1, 2, 2\({}^{\prime}\), and 3\({}^{\prime}\), C2-IPP in regio 1 and 2\({}^{\prime}\), and CP-IPP across all evaluated regions. Gender-based differences were found in regio 1, particularly in BPD values at levels A, B, and C, and in IDW at level D. All statistically relevant comparisons are presented in Table 3, color-coded by the different vertical and horizontal measurements. It is important to emphasize that the age group 21-30 had the highest CP-IPP values and 15-20 had the lowest values, while there were no gender-related significant differences between the different regions. IDW also showed the highest values among the age group 21-30, the lowest among 15-20, and only one value showed a significant difference in gender (males had a higher median value than females). BPD showed opposite results, where significantly lower values were seen among the 21-30 group and the highest values were among the 15-20 group, with the male gender found to have higher values. This proves that morphometric values may depend on gender and age group. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l l l l l} \hline  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Interclass**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**95\% Confidence Interval**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Mean Difference Between**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Standard Deviation Between**} \\  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Correlation**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Lower Bound**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Upper Bound**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Examiner 1 and Examiner 2**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Examiner 1 and Examiner 2**} \\ \hline CP & 0.981 & 0.966 & 0.989 & \(-\)0.086 & 0.166 \\ IPP & 0.990 & 0.984 & 0.994 & \(-\)0.041 & 0.121 \\ IDW & 0.946 & 0.913 & 0.967 & 0.011 & 0.167 \\ BPD & 0.975 & 0.959 & 0.984 & \(-\)0.053 & 0.174 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 1: Interclass correlation.