## 3 Results
### Descriptive Analysis and Differences between Lipid Mass Estimation Formulas
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Formulas**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Mean Differences \(\pm\)**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**95\%CI (Lower; Upper)**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\(p\) **Value**} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Cohen’s d**} \\ \hline \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-12.018\pm 0.191\) & \(-12.796;\)\(-11.240\) & \(p<0.001\) & 3.62 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-1.594\pm 0.331\) & \(-2.942;\)\(-0.247\) & \(p=0.004\) & 0.51 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-4.689\pm 0.190\) & \(-5.463;\)\(-3.914\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.36 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-3.252\pm 0.380\) & \(-4.802;\)\(-1.703\) & \(p<0.001\) & 2.59 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-7.147\pm 0.220\) & \(-8.046;\)\(-6.249\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.46 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(1.444\pm 0.138\) & \(0.8832;\)\(0.005\) & \(p<0.001\) & 2.55 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-9.534\pm 0.264\) & \(-10.609;\)\(-8.458\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.71 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(6.610\pm 0.303\) & \(5.375;\)\(7.846\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.33 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(4.487\pm 0.273\) & \(3.375;\)\(5.599\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.88 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(6.610\pm 0.303\) & \(5.375;\)\(7.846\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.33 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-5.408\pm 0.352\) & \(-6.843;\)\(-3.972\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.13 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(5.015\pm 0.532\) & \(2.847;\)\(7.185\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.03 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(1.922\pm 0.317\) & \(0.631;3.213\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.37 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(3.358\pm 0.281\) & \(2.2134;\)\(5.004\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.14 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-0.537\pm 0.450\) & \(-2.371;\)\(1.297\) & \(p=1.000\) & 1.67 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(8.054\pm 0.382\) & \(6.498;\)\(9.610\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.58 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-2.923\pm 0.288\) & \(-4.097;\)\(-1.750\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.56 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-10.978\pm 0.302\) & \(-12.209;\)\(-9.747\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.29 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(2.124\pm 0.150\) & \(1.5112;\)\(736\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.62 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-9.894\pm 0.253\) & \(-10.927;\)\(-8.862\) & \(p<0.001\) & 2.88 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(0.529\pm 0.370\) & \(-0.979;\)\(2.038\) & \(p=1.000\) & 0.16 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-2.565\pm 0.250\) & \(-3.401;\)\(-1.728\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.72 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-1.128\pm 0.336\) & \(-2.499;\)\(0.242\) & \(p=0.476\) & 1.73 \\ \% [PERSON]–\%[PERSON] & \(-5.024\pm 0.254\) & \(-6.058;\)\(-3.989\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.09 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(3.567\pm 0.239\) & \(2.594;\)\(4.541\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.93 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-7.410\pm 0.267\) & \(-8.499;\)\(-6.321\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.24 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-3.094\pm 0.404\) & \(-4.743;\)\(-1.445\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.95 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-1.658\pm 0.537\) & \(-3.847;\)\(0.532\) & \(p=1.000\) & 2.20 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-5.553\pm 0.230\) & \(-6.490;\)\(-4.615\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.04 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(3.038\pm 0.363\) & \(1.558;\)\(4.518\) & \(p<0.001\) & 2.22 \\ \% [PERSON]–\% [PERSON] & \(-7.939\pm 0.424\) & \(-9.668;\)\(-6.211\) & \(p<0.001\) & 0.37 \\ \% [PERSON]–\%[PERSON] & \(6.107\pm 0.343\) & \(4.882;\)\(7.333\) & \(p<0.001\) & 1.33 \\ \% [PERSON]–\%[PERSON] & \(-0.465\pm 0.396\) & \(-1.880;\)\(0.949\) & \(p=1.000\) & 0.10 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Differences between lipid formulas in mean of percentages in women.