## 5 Results and Discussion
Consequently, three routes achieved'medium' ratings, and only one route had a low rating for this criterion. Footpaths significantly boosted the ACI, facilitating more effortless mobility, preventing potential collisions and accidents, and guaranteeing direct and safe access to services and public facilities. As for artificial limbs, users received the lowest ratings based on their most important criterion: slope. Most routes had steep slopes and received'very low' ratings, except for three, which received a'medium' rating. The importance of the criteria for various disabled persons' vehicles used by males and females is evident in Figures 8 and 9. Both male and female artificial limb users agree  
Figure 6: Importance weights of the criteria for manual wheelchair, powered wheelchair, and artificial limb users. Figure 7: Accessibility index for different disabled persons’ vehicles. that slope is their most important criterion. However, the least essential criterion differs: for females, it was the number of junctions, while for males, both the number of junctions and the absence of footpath criteria were the least important. For powered wheelchairs used by females, the ranking of the most to least important criteria was absence of footpath, length, slope, and number of junctions. For males, it was the length, slope, absence of footpath, and the number of junctions. Males consider the number of junctions to be the least important of all the criteria. For manual wheelchair users, length was considered the most important for both males and females. For females, the absence of a footpath was also considered of high importance, similar to length, while the number of junctions was the least important for both genders. Figure 8 shows that length was the most critical criterion for males using powered and manual wheelchairs, while the number of junctions was the least important. For females, the absence of a footpath was highlighted as the most important, as shown in Figure 9, for both powered and manual wheelchair users, while the number of junctions was the least important by all female disabled persons' vehicle users. Considering the accessibility level of different vehicles for males and females, there is a clear difference between the artificial limbs used by males and females, as illustrated in  
Figure 8: Importance weights of the criteria for different disabled persons’ vehicles used by males. Figure 9: Importance weights of the criteria for different disabled persons’ vehicles used by females. Figure 8. R10 had the highest level of accessibility for all males and females, but there was a difference in the least accessible route. The least accessible route for males was R9, with a very low level of accessibility of 0.19, because the two most important criteria for males were the slope and then the length, and this route was relatively long, about 1479 m, with a very low rating. It had a slope of 5.21%, rated low, while the absence of a footpath and the number of junctions were equally important. For females, R7 was the lowest-rated one, and when looking at the importance of the criteria, the slope and the absence of a footpath were the most important for them. These two criteria received the lowest rating; the route was very steep at 7% with a very low rating, and the absence of a footpath was high at 61.53% with a low rating. It is clear from Figure 10 that the accessibility for females in most routes is higher than that for males, but in R5 and R7, there was a change. In R5, the slope criterion rating increased to medium, and the number of junctions increased to very high. The absence of footpaths remained at the same high rating, and length received a very low rating, as in R1 and R2, thus increasing accessibility for males. As for R7, the rating of the two most essential criteria for females, slope and absence of footpath, decreased, and slope decreased from medium in R6 to very low and absence of footpath decreased from high in R6 to low.