# Improved Graph-Based Arabic Hotel Review Summarization Using Polarity Classification
## 5 Experimental Results
\begin{tabular}{c} Sentiment \\ grouping \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{4}{*}{0.3283} & R: 0.3368 & R: 0.0902 & R: 0.2976 & & R: 0.3540 & R: 0.0986 & R: 0.3297 \\  & & P: 0.5330 & P: 0.1613 & P: 0.4710 & 0.3504 & P: 0.5019 & P: 0.1619 & P: 0.4674 \\  & & F: 0.4127 & F: 0.1157 & F: 0.3647 & & F: 0.4152 & F: 0 \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **Method** & **Hotel 1** & **Method** & **Hotel 2** & **Average** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{H1} & TextRank & 0.2983 & TextRank & 0.4030 & 0.3507 \\ \cline{2-5}  & \begin{tabular}{c} Three-class grouping: \\ rating grouping \\ \end{tabular} & **0.4327** & \begin{tabular}{c} Three-class grouping: \\ API grouping \\ \end{tabular} & **0.5766** & **0.5047** \\ \cline{2-5}  & \begin{tabular}{c} Five-class grouping: \\ rating grouping \\ \end{tabular} & 0.3223 & \begin{tabular}{c} Five-class grouping: \\ rating grouping \\ \end{tabular} & 0.5743 & 0.4483 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{H2} & TextRank & 0.3355 & TextRank & **0.4147** & 0.3751 \\ \cline{2-5}  & \begin{tabular}{c} Three-class grouping: \\ rating grouping \\ \end{tabular} & **0.3909** & \begin{tabular}{c} Three-class grouping: \\ rating grouping \\ \end{tabular} & 0.3771 & **0.3840** \\ \cline{2-5}  & \
\begin{tabular}{c} Five-class grouping: \\ rating grouping \\ \end{tabular} & 0.3342 &
\begin{tabular}{c} Five-class grouping: \\ rating grouping \\ \end{tabular} & 0.3699 & 0.3521 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 10: Summary of the best \(BLEU\) scores achieved for both hotels. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Experiment**} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{**Hotel 1**} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{**Hotel 2**} \\ \cline{2-9}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**BLEU**} & **ROUGE-1** & **ROUGE-2** & **ROUGE-L** & \multicolumn{1}{c}{**BLEU**} & **ROUGE-1** & **ROUGE-2** & **ROUGE-L** \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Human 1 and 2 agreement} & \multirow{3}{*}{0.4744} & R: 0.4586 & R: 0.1295 & R: 0.4173 & & R: 0.6590 & R: 0.263 & R: 0.6206 \\  & & P: 0.3881 & P: 0.1289 & P: 0.3531 & 0.2677 & P: 0.3917 & P: 0.1373 & P: 0.3690 \\  & & F: 0.4204 & F: 0.1292 & F: 0.3825 & & F: 0.4914 & F: 0.1806 & F: 0.4628 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{H1} & TextRank & \multirow{3}{*}{0.2983} & R: 0.3462 & R: 0.1187 & R: 0.3026 & & R: 0.6791 & R: 0.4395 & R: 0.6604 \\  & & P: 0.5000 & P: 0.2307 & P: 0.4370 & 0.4030 & 0.7 0.4965 & P: 0.2950 & P: 0.4829 \\  & & F: 0.4091 & F: 0.1568 & F: 0.3576 & & F: 0.5736 & F: 0.3530 & P: 0.5578 \\ \cline{2-9}  & \multirow{3}{*}{0.3223} & R: 0.3726 & R: 0.1476 & R: 0.3324 & & R: 0.6744 & R: 0.4218 & R: 0.6536 \\  & & P: 0.4860 & P: 0.2511 & P: 0.4335 & 0.5743 & P: 0.5899 & P: 0.3738 & P: 0.5717 \\  & & F: 0.4218 & F: 0.1859 & F: 0.3763 & & F: 0.6294 & F: 0.3964 & F: 0.6099 \\ \cline{2-9}  & \multirow{3}{*}{0.3303} & R: 0.3692 & R: 0.1310 & R: 0.3180 & & R: 0.6666 & R: 0.4189 & R: 0.6484 \\  & & P: 0.4790 & P: 0.2149 & P: 0.4125 & 0.5730 & P: 0.5831 & P: 0.3693 & P: 0.5671 \\  & & F: 0.4170 & F: 0.1628 & F: 0.3592 & & F: 0.6221 & F: 0.3925 & F: 0.6051 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{H2} & TextRank & \multirow{3}{*}{0.3355} & R: 0.3535 & R: 0.1152 & R: 0.3171 & & R: 0.3676 & R: 0.1057 & R: 0.3271 \\  & & P: 0.6033 & P: 0.2250 & P: 0.5413 & 0.4147 & P: 0.4521 & P: 0.1360 & P: 0.4022 \\  & & P: 0.4458 & F: 0.1524 & 0.3999 & & F: 0.4054 & F: 0.1189 & P: 0.3608 \\ \cline{2-9}  & \multirow{3}{*}{0.3248} & R: 0.3190 & R: 0.0784 & R: 0.2895 & & R: 0.3567 & R: 0.1067 & R: 0.3255 \\  & & P: 0.4917 & P: 0.1340 & P: 0.4462 & 0.3699 & P: 0.5249 & P: 0.1814 & P: 0.4789 \\  & & F: 0.3869 & F: 0.0989 & F: 0.3512 & & F: 0.4248 & F: 0.1343 & F: 0.3875 \\ \cline{2-9}  & \multirow{3}{*}{0.3342} & R: 0.3234 & R: 0.0772 & R: 0.2938 & & R: 0.3541 & R: 0.1008 & R: 0.3203 \\  & & P: 0.4958 & P: 0.1272 & P: 0.4504 & 0.3643 & P: 0.5210 & P: 0.1706 & P: 0.4712 \\  & & F: 0.3915 & F: 0.0961 & F: 0.3556 & & F: 0.4217 & F: 0.1268 & F: 0.3813 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 11: Summary of the best ROUG-1 F scores achieved for both hotels.