## 3 Results and Discussion
### Application of the Time-Saving Methodology  
The study shown in the previous section, which is complemented by studies presented in Refs [34; 39], corresponds to the thorough analysis of the application of passive retrofit measures in historic buildings that house artifacts while considering climate change. The effect of each of the selected passive retrofit measures was assessed in terms of artifacts' conservation metrics to see if they could mitigate the changes caused by climate change. In total, the study includes five climates and two of the new IPCC scenarios: RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Climate**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Scenario**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Parameter**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**W1**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**W2**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**W3**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**W4**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**W5**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**R1**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**R2**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**C1**} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**C2**} \\  & & **(2–20)** & & **(2–20)** & & **(2–20)** & & **(2–20)** & & **(1.5-5)** & & **(2–10)** & **(2–10)** & **(2–10)** & **(2–10)** \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Seville} & MRF & 18 & 20 & 4 & 20 & 11 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 3 & 10 \\  & eLM & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 7 \\  & Furniture & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 \\  & Seulpture & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 4 & 10 \\  & Base layer & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 \\  & Pictorial & layer & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 \\ \cline{2-16}  & MRF & 0 & 0 & 10 & 20 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 4 & 10 \\  & eLM & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 6 \\  & Furniture & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 \\  & Seulpture & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\  & Base layer & 4 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.6 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 3 & 10 \\  & Pictorial & layer & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 4 & 10 & 5 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Oslo} & MRF & 4 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 3 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 3 & 10 \\  & eLM & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 2 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Furniture & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 1.5 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Sculpture & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2.0 & 2.0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Base layer & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2.3 & 5.0 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 & 2 & 10 \\ \cline{1-1}  & Pictorial & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \cline{1-1}  & layer & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Thickness range (cm) that outperforms the case study without any retrofit measure (WR) for Seville and Oslo for future conditions: RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5. Overall, 1350 simulations were run in WUFI(r)Plus to perform this analysis (Figure 8), which would take ca. 1485 h to run in PC#1, i.e., almost 62 days of continuous simulation. Instead, the simulations were subdivided by 20 PC#2, which resulted in a decrease of 62% of the simulation run time since it dropped from 1485 to 567 h.  
For assessing the effects of the selected passive retrofit measures, the results-processing stage is important because the numerical processes included in this example are more complex (e.g., Figure A1 for assessing the biological decay) than simply sum values (e.g., Figure A2[28]).