## 3 Results
### Statistical Analysis
#### 3.4.2 Analysis of Parameters in the II Measurement  
The results of II measurement for the control and experimental groups is shown in Table 4.  
The minimum (min) and maximum (max) measured values in the II measurement of the control group indicate that the values are within the expected range. Higher values of the coefficient of variation (c.var) indicate the heterogeneity of the control group in terms of extraction wound volume (VOL (II)), bone tissue density (density (II)) and periodontal pocket depth (pocket (II)). Increased values of Skewness (sk) indicate that the distribution is _negatively asymmetric_, which means that the curve of the distribution of the results tends to higher values, or that there are more higher values compared to the normal distribution, for all three observed features. Higher values of Kurtosis (ku) indicate that the curve is elongated for bone density (density (II)) and pocket (pocket (II)). Negative values of Kurtosis (ku) indicate that the curve is flattened for volume values (VOL (II)). The distribution of values generally moves within the normal distribution (p) for all three observed parameters. The minimum (min) and maximum (max) parameters that were monitored in the II measurement in the experimental group indicate that the values are within the expected range. Higher values of the coefficient of variation (c.var) indicate experimental heterogeneity in terms of all three observed parameters. Increased values of Skewness (sk) indicate that the distribution is negatively asymmetric, which suggests that the curve of the distribution of the results tends to higher values, or that there are more higher values compared to the normal distribution for all observed features. Higher values of Kurtosis (ku) indicate that the curve is elongated for density (density (II)) and periodontal pocket (pocket (II)). Negative values of Kurtosis (ku) indicate that the curve is flattened for volume (VOL (II)). The distribution of values generally moves within the normal distribution (p) in the case of volume (VOL (II)) and density (density (II)). The distribution of values deviates from the normal distribution (p) in the case of a periodontal pocket (pocket (II)). Table 5 shows the results of the significance of the difference between the groups, in regards to the monitored parameters in the II measurement. Based on the value of \(p=0.499\) (MANOVA it can also be concluded that no significant difference and a clearly defined boundary between the groups were observed. Further, \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline  & & **Mean Value** & **std.d** & **Min** & **Max** & **c.var** & **conf.inter.** & **sk** & **ku** & \(p\) \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Control Group} & VOL (II) & 296.02 & 115.73 & 112.2 & 538.7 & 39.09 & 252.80 & 339.24 & 0.44 & \(-\)0.82 & 0.574 \\ \cline{2-11}  & density (II) & 134.69 & 63.59 & 23.9 & 310.2 & 47.22 & 110.93 & 158.44 & 0.67 & 0.92 & 0.565 \\ \cline{2-11}  & pocket (II) & 4.32 & 1.76 & 1.0 & 9.0 & 40.87 & 3.66 & 4.98 & 0.69 & 0.48 & 0.516 \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Experimental Group} & VOL (II) & 261.47 & 90.31 & 120.8 & 460.4 & 34.54 & 227.74 & 295.20 & 0.39 & \(-\)0.37 & 0.641 \\ \cline{2-11}  & density (II) & 131.33 & 74.96 & \(-\)55.2 & 319.5 & 57.08 & 103.33 & 159.33 & 0.24 & 1.17 & 0.778 \\ \cline{1-1} \cline{2-11}  & pocket (II) & 3.83 & 1.60 & 1.0 & 8.0 & 41.72 & 3.24 & 4.43 & 0.84 & 0.51 & 0.095 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Results of II measurement in the control and experimental groups. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \hline \hline
**Analysis** & **F** & \(p\) \\ \hline MANOVA & 0.800 & 0.499 \\ \hline VOL (I) & 1.662 & 0.203 \\ \hline Density (I) & 0.035 & 0.852 \\ \hline Periodontal pocket (I) & 0.426 & 0.516 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Significance of the difference between the groups, in regards to the monitored parameters in the II measurement.