[16] proposed a simple mathematical lumped model to analyze and test 19 different samples of composite activated carbon with ENG and used only one adsorbent tube to predict the performance for refrigeration and freezing applications. They concluded that the best sample would attain increases in the COP, SCP, and VCP by \(-\)15%, 602%, and 605% for air conditioning, and \(-\)16%, 505%, and 632.5% for freezing purposes compared to the packed-bed form. [PERSON], et al. [17] proposed a new type of composite adsorbent consisting of activated carbon with ENG-TSA as a binder, the improvement of thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity was 45 times and 150 times, respectively. It can be noticed that activated carbon-based composite adsorbent is the commonly chosen material for adsorption ice maker systems and can be obtained from different sources [18]. Maxsorb III is a type of activated carbon featured with a higher surface area of about 3200 m\({}^{2}\cdot\)g\({}^{-1}\) that leads to higher adsorption characteristics with many refrigerants [19; 20; 21]. However, the lower bulk thermal conductivity and density of Maxsorb III negatively affect its cyclic performance in ARS systems [14; 22]. Graphite nanoplatelets is an emerging type of additives that has attracted attention in many studies due its exceptional thermal conductivity properties [23]. Graphite nanoplatelets have a very small thickness scaled in nanometer [24]. The thermal conductivity can reach 3000 W\(\cdot\)m\({}^{-1}\cdot\)K\({}^{-1}\) in parallel direction to the investigated surface while in perpendicular direction the value reaches 6 W\(\cdot\)m\({}^{-1}\cdot\)K\({}^{-1}\)[25]. Recently, [PERSON], et al. [26] presented four composites of Maxsorb III (AC) with PVA and GNPs. They deduced that the third composite (which comprises of 50% Maxsorb III,10% PVA, and 40% H25 by weight) was the optimum choice for cooling. Using thermodynamic analysis, they reported that the specific cooling energy was 425, 375, 300 kJ\(\cdot\)kg\({}^{-1}\) at evaporator temperatures of 15, 10, and 5 \({}^{\circ}\)C. The previous studies were focused on investigating the behavior of the consolidated form of composite adsorbent mainly on the material level. Developing a detailed numerical model to predict the whole ARS performance for the ice production using the composite consolidated adsorbent bedshad less consideration. However, the mass transfer mechanisms within the adsorbent bed could be negatively affected due to using the adhesive materials and additives. Therefore, the net effect of contradiction between the thermal and adsorption characteristics on the ARSs performance under typical operating conditions for each application needs to be evaluated [27]. Regarding the mathematical modeling, there are different approaches used to mimic the adsorption process in the adsorbent bed including thermodynamic modeling, lumped modeling, and CFD modeling. The latter accounts for the inter-particle and intra-particle mass transfer resistances that are needed to catch the effect of composite adsorbent compositions. The microscopic details of the porous adsorbent materials are considered in CFD modeling using the volume-averaged approach [28]. Thus, the three phases which are adsorbent, adsorbate, and vapor phases in the adsorbent domain are demonstrated and their net effect is incorporated with the conservation equations of mass, momentum, and energy. [PERSON] et al. [29] developed a CFD fully coupled model for silica gel/water finned-tube type packed beds associated with the turbulent flow model of the heat-transfer-fluid that flows in the adsorber tube. They considered the time variations of the condenser and evaporator pressures using two zero-dimensional models. They concluded that the performance of the ARS was sensitive to the change in the evaporator and condenser pressures which could change the predicted cooling capacity from +12.3 to \(-\)18.5%.