## 3 Result
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l l c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Relationship between Shade and Skin Color.\({}^{\text{a}}\)**} \\ \hline  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Skin Color**} \\ \cline{3-8}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Shole**} & **1** & **II** & **III** & **IV** & **V** & **VI** \\ \hline \hline \multirow{3}{*}{A1} & No. Participants & 4 & 5 & 8 & 1 & 3 & 0 & 21 \\  & \% within Shade & 19.0\% & 23.8\% & 38.1\% & 4.8\% & 14.3\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 57.1\% & 12.2\% & 12.5\% & 1.5\% & 17.6\% & 0.0\% & 10.6\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{A2} & No. Participants & 1 & 14 & 13 & 5 & 3 & 1 & 37 \\  & \% within Shade & 2.7\% & 37.8\% & 35.1\% & 13.5\% & 8.1\% & 2.7\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 14.3\% & 34.1\% & 20.3\% & 7.5\% & 17.6\% & 50.0\% & 18.7\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{A3} & No. Participants & 1 & 2 & 13 & 18 & 1 & 0 & 35 \\  & \% within Shade & 2.9\% & 5.7\% & 37.1\% & 51.4\% & 2.9\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 14.3\% & 4.9\% & 20.3\% & 26.9\% & 5.9\% & 0.0\% & 17.7\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{A3.5} & No. Participants & 0 & 2 & 0 & 6 & 2 & 0 & 10 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 20.0\% & 0.0\% & 60.0\% & 20.0\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 4.9\% & 0.0\% & 9.0\% & 11.8\% & 0.0\% & 5.1\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{A4} & No. Participants & 1 & 3 & 5 & 6 & 2 & 0 & 17 \\  & \% within Shade & 5.9\% & 17.6\% & 29.4\% & 35.3\% & 11.8\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 14.3\% & 7.3\% & 7.8\% & 9.0\% & 11.8\% & 0.0\% & 8.6\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{B2} & No. Participants & 0 & 6 & 10 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 19 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 31.6\% & 52.6\% & 10.5\% & 0.0\% & 5.3\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 14.6\% & 15.6\% & 3.0\% & 0.0\% & 50.0\% & 9.6\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{B3} & No. Participants & 0 & 4 & 6 & 17 & 2 & 0 & 29 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 13.8\% & 20.7\% & 58.6\% & 6.9\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 9.8\% & 9.4\% & 25.4\% & 11.8\% & 0.0\% & 14.6\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{B4} & No. Participants & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 1.5\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.5\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{C1} & No. Participants & 0 & 1 & 1 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 5 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 20.0\% & 20.0\% & 60.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 2.4\% & 1.6\% & 4.5\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 2.5\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{C2} & No. Participants & 0 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 5 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 40.0\% & 40.0\% & 20.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 4.9\% & 3.1\% & 1.5\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 2.5\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{C3} & No. Participants & 0 & 0 & 3 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 6 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 50.0\% & 33.3\% & 16.7\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\ \cline{1-1}  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 4.7\% & 3.0\% & 5.9\% & 0.0\% & 3.0\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{C4} & No. Participants & 0 & 0 & 2 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 4 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 50.0\% & 50.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\ \cline{1-1}  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 3.1\% & 3.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 2.0\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{D3} & No. Participants & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 2 \\  & \% within Shade & 0.0\% & 50.0\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 50.0\% & 0.0\% & 100.0\% \\ \cline{1-1}  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 2.4\% & 0.0\% & 0.0\% & 5.9\% & 0.0\% & 1.0\% \\ \cline{1-1}  & \% within Skin color & 0.0\% & 2.4\% & 1.6\% & 1.5\% & 11.8\% & 0.0\% & 2.5\% \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{Total} & No. Participants & 7 & 41 & 64 & 67 & 17 & 2 & 198 \\ \cline{1-1}  & \% within Shade & 3.5\% & 20.7\% & 32.3\% & 33.8\% & 8.6\% & 1.0\% & 100.0\% \\ \cline{1-1}  & \% within Skin color & 100.0\% & 100.0\% & 100.0\% & 100.0\% & 100.0\% & 100.0\% \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Relationship between shade and skin types. Skin color type IV appeared to be the most dominant type.