## 3 Results
### Optimization of Parameters and Design Checks in UV Processing
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Run Order**} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(\mathbf{X_{1}}\)} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(\mathbf{X_{2}}\)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{**Phenolic Content (mg GAE/L)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Turbidity**} & \multirow{2}{*}{\({}^{\circ}\)**Brix**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Color a*} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Cout log CFU/mL**} \\  & & & & & & & & **CFU/mL** \\ \hline
1 & 50 & 1.5 & 1 LAMP & 920 \(\pm\) 4.42 \({}^{\mathrm{g}}\) & 4.01 \(\pm\) 0.007 \({}^{\mathrm{i}}\) & 14 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{c}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.08 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 3.09 \(\pm\) 0.96 \({}^{\mathrm{g}}\) \\
2 & 60 & 1.5 & 1 LAMP & 857 \(\pm\) 0.44 \({}^{\mathrm{i}}\) & 3.59 \(\pm\) 0.000 \({}^{\mathrm{k}}\) & 15 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.07 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & \(<\)0.5 \({}^{\mathrm{k}}\) \\
3 & 50 & 3.5 & 2 LAMPS & 969 \(\pm\) 0.59 \({}^{\mathrm{d}}\) & 3.99 \(\pm\) 0.007 \({}^{\mathrm{g}}\) & 15 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.05 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 3.11 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{f}}\) \\
4 & 40 & 1.5 & 1 LAMP & 1055 \(\pm\) 2.21 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 4.58 \(\pm\) 0.007 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) & 14 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{c}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.09 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 3.75 \(\pm\) 0.82 \({}^{\mathrm{c}}\) \\
5 & 40 & 3.5 & 2 LAMPS & 1053 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) & 4.34 \(\pm\) 0.000 \({}^{\mathrm{d}}\) & 14 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{c}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 3.86 \(\pm\) 0.50 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) \\
6 & 50 & 3.5 & 1 LAMP & 1020 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{c}}\) & 4.05 \(\pm\) 0.003 \({}^{\mathrm{f}}\) & 15 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 3.34 \(\pm\) 0.50 \({}^{\mathrm{e}}\) \\
7 & 50 & 1.5 & 2 LAMPS & 890 \(\pm\) 0.14 \({}^{\mathrm{h}}\) & 4.19 \(\pm\) 0.004 \({}^{\mathrm{e}}\) & 15 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.05 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 2.97 \(\pm\) 0.58 \({}^{\mathrm{h}}\) \\
8 & 60 & 1.5 & 2 LAMPS & 840 \(\pm\) 0.25 \({}^{\mathrm{i}}\) & 3.61 \(\pm\) 0.014 \({}^{\mathrm{k}}\) & 16 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{a}}\) & 2.5 \(\pm\) 0.03 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & \(<\)0.5 \({}^{\mathrm{k}}\) \\
9 & 40 & 3.5 & 1 LAMP & 1060 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{a}}\) & 4.41 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{c}}\) & 14 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{c}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.06 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 3.92 \(\pm\) 0.56 \({}^{\mathrm{a}}\) \\
10 & 40 & 1.5 & 2 LAMPS & 938 \(\pm\) 1.80 \({}^{\mathrm{f}}\) & 4.61 \(\pm\) 0.021 \({}^{\mathrm{a}}\) & 14 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{c}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.01 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 3.59 \(\pm\) 0.50 \({}^{\mathrm{d}}\) \\
11 & 60 & 3.5 & 1 LAMP & 958 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{e}}\) & 3.82 \(\pm\) 0.004 \({}^{\mathrm{h}}\) & 15 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) & 2.3 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{ab}}\) & 2.00 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{i}}\) \\
12 & 60 & 3.5 & 2 LAMPS & 925 \(\pm\) 0.00 \({}^{\mathrm{g}}\) & 3.76 \(\pm\) 0.014 \({}^{\mathrm{i}}\) & 15 \(\pm\) 0.0 \({}^{\mathrm{b}}\) & 2.5 \(\pm\) 0.07 \({}^{\mathrm{a}}\) & 1.69 \(\pm\) 0.82 \({}^{\mathrm{j}}\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \(X_{1}\) (Temperature, \({}^{\circ}\)C), X\({}_{2}\) (Flow rate, L/min), X\({}_{3}\) (UV Lamp 1 and 2 doses are 5.1 and 10.1 mW/cm2, respectively).  
\(\pm\)-i: Mean with superscripts of different small letters in the same columns are significantly different as Duncan test (\(p<0.05\)). The values are expressed as mean \(\pm\) standard deviation (replications = 3).  
\end{table} 
Table 2: Experimental parameters in the UV process and the observed response values for pomeraurate juice. \begin{table}