## 4 Discussion  
Descriptive statistical analysis shows that coaches have higher levels of qualitative job insecurity than quantitative job insecurity. These results reflect the coaches' fear that their positions will change negatively, either by reduced number of athletes trained, or by participating in fewer competitions, or by the increased work demands caused by the conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The conditions for carrying out the activity are hampered by the lack of means of communication, access to the Internet, technical equipment necessary for the remotely evaluating and monitoring the athletes. At the same time, quantitative job insecurity shows the coaches' fear that they will lose their job, which is less significant, but existing. The financiers of the sports clubs can order the dismissal of a coach if he does not obtain remarkable results with the athletes he trains, and the coaches are aware of this reality. At the same time, the coaches consider that they have sufficient material resources to carry out their activity, mostly the scores obtained by them being above average. Their \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & & & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**95\% C.I. (a)**} \\ \hline
**Type** & **Effect** & **Estimate** & **SE** & **Lower** & **Upper** & \(\beta\) & **Z** & \(p\) \\ \hline Indirect & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) JICAL \(\Rightarrow\) ANX & 0.13 & 0.03 & 0.07 & 0.19 & 0.17 & 4.39 & \textless{}0.001 \\  & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) JICAN \(\Rightarrow\) ANX & \(-\)0.03 & 0.02 & \(-\)0.07 & 0.00 & \(-\)0.04 & \(-\)1.91 & 0.056 \\  & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) WS \(\Rightarrow\) ANX & 0.01 & 0.01 & \(-\)0.01 & 0.03 & 0.01 & 0.81 & 0.416 \\ Component & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) JICAL & 0.37 & 0.06 & 0.25 & 0.49 & 0.40 & 6.11 & \textless{}0.001 \\  & JICAL \(\Rightarrow\) ANX & 0.35 & 0.06 & 0.24 & 0.46 & 0.43 & 6.32 & \textless{}0.001 \\  & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) JICAN & 0.21 & 0.04 & 0.13 & 0.30 & 0.32 & 4.84 & \textless{}0.001 \\  & JICAN \(\Rightarrow\) ANX & \(-\)0.16 & 0.08 & \(-\)0.31 & \(-\)0.01 & \(-\)0.14 & \(-\)2.08 & 0.038 \\  & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) WS & \(-\)0.05 & 0.06 & \(-\)0.18 & 0.07 & \(-\)0.06 & \(-\)0.85 & 0.397 \\  & WS \(\Rightarrow\) ANX & \(-\)0.15 & 0.05 & \(-\)0.26 & \(-\)0.05 & \(-\)0.18 & \(-\)2.90 & 0.004 \\ Direct & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) ANX & 0.01 & 0.05 & \(-\)0.10 & 0.11 & 0.01 & 0.11 & 0.910 \\ Total & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) ANX & 0.11 & 0.05 & 0.01 & 0.21 & 0.15 & 2.14 & 0.032 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 4: Indirect and total effects of predictors on anxiety. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline  & & & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**95\% C.I. (a)**} \\ \hline
**Type** & **Effect** & **Estimate** & **SE** & **Lower** & **Upper** & \(\beta\) & **Z** & \(p\) \\ \hline Indirect & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) JICAL \(\Rightarrow\) STR & 0.12 & 0.03 & 0.06 & 0.18 & 0.14 & 3.89 & \textless{}0.001 \\  & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) JICAN \(\Rightarrow\) STR & \(-\)0.03 & 0.02 & \(-\)0.07 & 0.01 & \(-\)0.04 & \(-\)1.69 & 0.091 \\  & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) WS \(\Rightarrow\) STR & 0.01 & 0.01 & \(-\)0.01 & 0.02 & 0.01 & 0.78 & 0.438 \\ Component & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) JICAL & 0.37 & 0.06 & 0.25 & 0.49 & 0.40 & 6.11 & \textless{}0.001 \\  & JICAL \(\Rightarrow\) STR & 0.31 & 0.06 & 0.19 & 0.44 & 0.36 & 5.04 & \textless{}0.001 \\  & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) JICAN & 0.21 & 0.04 & 0.13 & 0.30 & 0.32 & 4.84 & \textless{}0.001 \\  & JICAN \(\Rightarrow\) STR & \(-\)0.16 & 0.09 & \(-\)0.33 & 0.01 & \(-\)0.12 & \(-\)1.81 & 0.071 \\  & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) WS & \(-\)0.05 & 0.06 & \(-\)0.18 & 0.07 & \(-\)0.06 & \(-\)0.85 & 0.397 \\  & WS \(\Rightarrow\) STR & \(-\)0.12 & 0.06 & \(-\)0.23 & 0.00 & \(-\)0.13 & \(-\)1.95 & 0.052 \\ Direct & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) STR & 0.04 & 0.06 & \(-\)0.08 & 0.17 & 0.05 & 0.73 & 0.464 \\ Total & DIF \(\Rightarrow\) STR & 0.13 & 0.06 & 0.02 & 0.25 & 0.17 & 2.39 & 0.017 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 5: Indirect and total effects of predictors on stress.