# Service-Aware Interactive Presentation of Items for Decision-Making
## Materials and Methods
### Review Analysis
#### 3.2.3 Binding Review Sentences to Evaluation Dimensions
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Question** & **Mean** & **Variance** & **Standard Deviation** & **Aspect** & **Factor** \\ \hline
1 & \(\uparrow\) 2.079 & 0.669 & 0.818 & annoying/enjoyable & Attractiveness \\
2 & \(\uparrow\) 2.079 & 0.561 & 0.749 & not understandable/understandable & Perspicity \\
3 & \(\uparrow\) 1.395 & 2.516 & 1.586 & creative/dull & **Novelty** \\
4 & \(\uparrow\) 1.842 & 2.299 & 1.516 & easy to learn/difficult to learn & Perspicity \\
5 & \(\uparrow\) 1.553 & 1.497 & 1.224 & valuable/inferior & Stimulation \\
6 & \(\uparrow\) 1.526 & 1.391 & 1.179 & boring/exciting & Stimulation \\
7 & \(\uparrow\) 2.000 & 0.703 & 0.838 & not interesting/interesting & Stimulation \\
8 & \(\uparrow\) 1.158 & 2.083 & 1.443 & unpredictable/predictable & Dependability \\
9 & \(\uparrow\) 2.316 & 0.817 & 0.904 & fast/slow & Efficiency \\
10 & \(\uparrow\) 1.895 & 1.178 & 1.085 & inventive/conventional & Novelty \\
11 & \(\uparrow\) 2.421 & 0.358 & 0.599 & obstructive/supportive & Dependability \\
12 & \(\uparrow\) 1.632 & 1.320 & 1.149 & good/bad & Attractiveness \\
13 & \(\uparrow\) 2.026 & 1.161 & 1.078 & complicated/easy & Perspicity \\
14 & \(\uparrow\) 1.474 & 1.499 & 1.224 & unlikable/pleasing & Attractiveness \\
15 & \(\uparrow\) 2.053 & 0.754 & 0.868 & usual/leading edge & Novelty \\
16 & \(\uparrow\) 2.132 & 0.712 & 0.844 & unpleasant/pleasant & Attractiveness \\
17 & \(\uparrow\) 1.684 & 1.519 & 1.233 & secure/not secure & Dependability \\
18 & \(\uparrow\) 1.579 & 1.494 & 1.222 & motivating/demotivating & Stimulation \\
19 & \(\uparrow\) 1.895 & 1.124 & 1.060 & meets expectations/does not meet expectations & Dependability \\
20 & \(\uparrow\) 2.211 & 0.549 & 0.741 & inefficient/efficient & Efficiency \\
21 & \(\uparrow\) 1.921 & 1.480 & 1.217 & clear/confusing & Perspicity \\
22 & \(\uparrow\) 2.132 & 0.820 & 0.906 & impractical/practical & Efficiency \\
23 & \(\uparrow\) 1.974 & 1.432 & 1.197 & organized/cluttered & Efficiency \\
24 & \(\uparrow\) 1.895 & 1.070 & 1.034 & attractive/unattractive & Attractiveness \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 3: Post-task questionnaire results for Apartment Monitoring; we use the same notation as in Table 2.

## References

* [1] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Navigating information spaces: a case study of related article search in PubMed. _Inf. Process. Manag._ **2008**, _44_, 1771-1783. [CrossRef]
* [2] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook. In _Recommender Systems Handbook_, [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], Eds. ; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 1-35. [CrossRef]
* [3] [PERSON]; [PERSON] Explaining recommendations: Design and evaluation. In _Recommender Systems Handbook_, [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], Eds. ; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 353-382. [CrossRef]
* [4] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] How to Recommend? User Trust Factors in Movie Recommender Systems. In _Proceedings of the 22 nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'17)_, Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 287-300. [CrossRef]
* [5] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Trust in Recommender Systems. In _Proceedings of the 26 th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP'18)_, Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 285-289. [CrossRef]
* [6] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Relational social recommendation: application to the academic domain. _Expert Syst. Appl._ **2019**, _124_, 182-195. [CrossRef]
* [7] [PERSON]; [PERSON] Exploring social recommendations with visual diversity-promoting interfaces. _ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst._ **2019**, _10_, 5:1-5:34. [CrossRef]
* [8] [PERSON]; [PERSON]; [PERSON] Agents vs. users: Visual recommendation of research talks with multiple dimension of relevance. _ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst._ **2016**, \(6\).