## 3 Results and Discussion
### Isolation and Identification of Compound **1**
**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**PFPT Name**} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{**GA**} & **ECC** & **C** & **CA** & **EC** & **ECCG** & **GG** & **ECG** & **Teaden-ol A** \\ \cline{3-10}  & & & \multicolumn{6}{c}{**Mean Content (mg/g) (\(\mathbf{r=6}\))**} \\ \hline
1 & Jjin zny & 39.16 \(\pm\) 1.1 & 10.85 \(\pm\) 0.3 & 8.46 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 39.35 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.80 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 22.47 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 10.39 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 9.52 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 0.25 \(\pm\) 0.0 \\
2 & [PERSON] & 53.56 \(\pm\) 2.1 & 9.02 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 5.35 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 46.06 \(\pm\) 0.9 & 1.37 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 18.48 \(\pm\) 0.3 & 9.09 \(\pm\) 0.3 & 4.57 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.20 \(\pm\) 0.0 \\
3 & [PERSON] & 121.81 \(\pm\) 1.2 & 25.06 \(\pm\) 0.8 & 15.9 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 52.87 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 5.02 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 4.39 \(\pm\) 1.4 & 1.391 \(\pm\) 0.4 & 1.90 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.15 \(\pm\) 0.0 \\
4 & Gongting pre-er & 11.82 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.52 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 0.59 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 34.88 \(\pm\) 0.4 & 0.35 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.32 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 0.20 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 0.67 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.17 \(\pm\) 0.0 \\
5 & Nanye repachals & 11.82 \(\pm\) 0.48 & 4.06 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.85 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 30.29 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 3.24 \(\pm\) 1.68 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 0.46 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.25 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.40 \(\pm\) 0.0 \\
6 & Mahap & 1.55 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 3.67 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.51 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 21.72 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.03 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 0.47 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.60 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.00 \(\pm\) 0.2 \\  7 & Huilong & 124.50 \(\pm\) 1.1 & 12.24 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 11.23 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 55.70 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 2.74 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 4.29 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.23 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 7.87 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 1.43 \(\pm\) 0.1 \\  & Shenglugliig & 6.33 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 3.80 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 1.18 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 36.78 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 1.18 \(\pm\) 0.4 & 0.98 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 0.26 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.19 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 1.18 \(\pm\) 0.2 \\
8 & Virginia & 8.09 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 6.93 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 2.14 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 32.24 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 2.23 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 0.91 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 0.54 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 1.37 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 1.17 \(\pm\) 0.2 \\
10 & Lizhhong & 22.80 \(\pm\) 0.54 & 1.26 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 2.16 \(\pm\) 0.6 & 58.53 \(\pm\) 0.6 & 1.60 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 78.07 \(\pm\) 0.3 & 20.12 \(\pm\) 1.0 & 10.78 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 1.28 \(\pm\) 0.0 \\
11 & Namanye biha & 4.30 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 1.50 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 6.11 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 30.31 \(\pm\) 0.5 & 0.34 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.25 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 0.69 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.47 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 5.03 \(\pm\) 0.2 \\  & Nantafingam & 21.62 \(\pm\) 1.2 & 11.18 \(\pm\) 1.1 & 2.41 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 40.45 \(\pm\) 0.9 & 2.91 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 1.74 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.59 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.86 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.25 \(\pm\) 0.2 \\
12 & Paiai & 22.80 \(\pm\) 1.6 & 1.98 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 7.68 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 34.12 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.15 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 17.34 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 8.46 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 1.61 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 3.15 \(\pm\) 0.3 \\
13 & Penabi & 21.62 \(\pm\) 1.2 & 11.98 \(\pm\) 1.0 & 2.15 \(\pm\) 0.2 & 36.01 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 0.47 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 8.34 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 3.76 \(\pm\) 0.0 & 1.75 \(\pm\) 0.1 & 6.2 of C-2-C-14 and C-12-C-16 bonds, respectively. Furthermore, NOE spectral data (Table 2, Figure 4) supported the structural correlations observed in the HMBC spectrum. The small \(J\) value (2.4 Hz) of H-2 observed in the \({}^{1}\)H-NMR spectrum of compound **1** (Table 2) indicated a _cis_ conformation between the C-2 and C-3 positions. The \({}^{1}\)H-NMR and \({}^{13}\)C-NMR spectral data of **1** (Table 2) were similar to those of Teadenol A [33; 34]. Therefore, compound **1** was identified as Teadenol A (Figure 5). Figure 4: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectrometry assay of compound **1:** (**a**) Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation (HMBC); (**b**) Heteronuclear Singular Quantum Correlation (HSQC); (**c**) Total Correlation Spectroscopy (TOCSY).