## 1 Introduction  
Intensive agriculture has been linked to severe environmental repercussions, primarily attributable to the excessive utilization of agricultural chemicals, a notable source of pollution. The overapplication of pesticides contributes to heightened pest resistance, posing challenges for effective pest control [1]. Consequently, there is a continuous quest for innovative and safe approaches to enhance plant growth and stress resistance [2]. This circumstance instigates exploration into novel technologies and production methods that can yield economically profitable harvests while ensuring environmental protection. An approach aligned with these requirements is integrated plant protection, emphasizing the sustainable use of pesticides, with a preference for non-chemical methods, notably those derived from natural sources. This strategy necessitates a discerning selection of preparations, particularly considering the phased withdrawal of active pesticide ingredients [3]. In line with the European Union's Green Deal initiative, the gradual reduction in synthetic products in favor of natural alternatives, including phytochemicals, is endorsed.  
Phytochemicals, recognized for their roles in the pharmaceutical industry, also hold significance in agriculture and veterinary practices [4]. [PERSON] et al. [5] affirmed the viability of replacing chemical plant protection agents with biologists, especially in smaller farms and for seed and grain storage. Biopesticides, a subset of biological agents, encompass natural preparations primarily derived from plants and microorganisms (microalgae, viruses, antagonistic fungi, and bacteria) and are applied to manage agricultural pests and pathogens [6]. Currently, biopesticides stand as a pivotal component in integrated crop protection programs, offering a natural alternative to chemical pesticides [7]. Among the three main groups of biopesticides, those based on biologically active compounds from plants, including extracts and essential oils, are prominent [6,8]. Plants, by virtue of harboring bioactive chemical compounds with biocidal effects, notably cannabinoids, terpen, and phenolic compounds, offer substantial prospects for ensuring the protection and safety of food [9]. The in-depth investigation into the biochemistry of hemp seed (_Cannabis sativa_ L.) has laid the groundwork for a comprehensive exploration of the chemistry, biology, and medicinal attributes inherent in this plant [10]. The genus _Cannabis_ L. stands as a monotypic taxon, signifying it encompasses only one species--_Cannabis sativa_ L. (hemp). This species has undergone subdivision into two subspecies distinguished by their THC (tetarboxomaninol) content. _C. sativa_ L. var. _saitva_ manifests a low level of \(\Delta\)9-THC, while _C. sativa_ L. var. indica is characterized by elevated levels of \(\Delta\)9-THC (25-30%) [11; 12; 13; 14]. Hemp, being a versatile industrial species, emerges as a prolific source of phytochemicals, boasting descriptions of over 560 biologically active compounds [10; 15; 16]. These compounds delineate hemp's multifaceted properties, encompassing antimicrobial, antiparasitic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, analgesic, and anticancer attributes [17; 18].  
The objective of the research was to analyze the chemical composition of hemp fluorescence extracts as well as to evaluate their fungistatic activity against selected fungi affecting agricultural plants. The antifungal effect was assessed by calculating the linear growth inhibition coefficient of the fungi. The obtained results will allow for the assessment of the degree of fungistatic effect of hemp extracts against the tested groups of pathogens. In addition, the concentration of hemp extract that most effectively inhibits fungal growth will be determined. The information obtained will be used for further research, focusing on improving the composition and recipe of the hemp-based product, and then field assessing its effectiveness as a product used in plant protection.