## 3 Nuclear Analyses
### Summary of the Nuclear Load's Spatial Distributions Analyses
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline  & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**WCLL—Outer Target**} \\ \hline Nuclear heating & \multicolumn{2}{c}{W monoblocks} & Cu/CuCrZr components & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Eurofer PFC-CB supports} \\ \cline{2-5} (W/cm\({}^{3}\)) & Value & R \(\times\) C & Value & R \(\times\) C & Value & R \(\times\) C \\ \hline Max. & 21.40 & \begin{tabular}{c} 47 \(\times\) 1 \\ 47 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} & 8.28 & \begin{tabular}{c} 49 \(\times\) 1 \\ 49 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} & 6.69 & \begin{tabular}{c} 10 \(\times\) 1 \\ 10 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Min. & 8.31 & 4 \(\times\) 22 & 2.94 & 1 \(\times\) 22 & 1.96 & 1 \(\times\) 22 \\ \hline Nuclear damage (dpa/FPY) & W-Monoblocks & Cu/CuCrZr components & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Eurofer—PFC-CB supports} \\ \hline Max. & 2.07 & \begin{tabular}{c} 53 \(\times\) 1 \\ 53 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} & 8.47 & \begin{tabular}{c} 54 \(\times\) 1 \\ 54 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} & 4.99 & \begin{tabular}{c} 11 \(\times\) 1 \\ 11 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Min. & 0.43 & 1 \(\times\) 22 & 1.42 & 1 \(\times\) 22 & 0.77 & 1 \(\times\) 22 \\ \hline He-production (appm/FPY) & W-Monoblocks & Cu/CuCrZr components & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Eurofer—PFC-CB supports} \\ \hline Max. & 1.88 & \begin{tabular}{c} 53 \(\times\) 1 \\ 53 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} & 55.56 & \
\begin{tabular}{c} 52 \(\times\) 1 \\ 52 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} & 57.15 &
\begin{tabular}{c} 11 \(\times\) 1 \\ 11 \(\times\) 43 \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Min. & 0.37 & 1 \(\times\) 22 & 8.04 & 1 \(\times\) 22 & 9.25 & 1 \(\times\) 22 \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: Maximum and minimum values and related position (in terms of row (R) and column (C) of the array) of nuclear heating density (W/cm\({}^{3}\)), nuclear damage (dpa/FPY), He-production (appm/FPY) on the PFCs of the WCLL outer target. * The minimum values are achieved in correspondence of the PFCs arranged on the lower part and innermost regions (straight legs) of the inner and outer target (both with WCLL and HCPB), as expected and already observed in past studies ([PERSON] et al., 2018; [PERSON] et al., 2018). * All these nuclear loads show spatial distributions with an overall symmetrical trend along the toroidal abscissa, with respect to the target central axis, as highlighted in Figure 29. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline  & \multicolumn{5}{c}{**HCPB–Unner Target**} \\ \hline Nuclear heating & \multicolumn{2}{c}{W monoblocks} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Cu/CuCrZr components} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Eurofer PFC-CB supports} \\ \cline{2-7} (W/cm\({}^{3}\)) & Value & R \(\times\) C & Value & R \(\times\) C & Value & R \(\times\) C \\ \hline Max. & 19.00 & \(\begin{array}{c}58\times 1\\ 58\times 31\end{array}\) & 8.14 & \(\begin{array}{c}60\times 1\\ 60\times 31\end{array}\) & 6.45 & \(\begin{array}{c}13\times 1\\ 13\times 31\end{array}\) \\ \hline Min. & 10.44 & \(4\times 16\) & 3.22 & \(1\times 16\) & 2.09 & \(1\times 16\) \\ \hline Nuclear damage & \multicolumn{2}{c}{W-Monoblocks} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Cu/CuCrZr components} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Eurofer—PFC-CB supports} \\ \hline Max. & 1.83 & \(\begin{array}{c}66\times 1\\ 66\times 31\end{array}\) & 7.31 & \(\begin{array}{c}60\times 1\\ 60\times 31\end{array}\) & 4.40 & \(\begin{array}{c}13\times 1\\ 13\times 31\end{array}\) \\ \hline Min. & 0.44 & \(1\times 16\) & 1.47 & \(1\times 16\) & 0.72 & \(1\times 16\) \\ \hline He-production & \multicolumn{2}{c}{W-Monoblocks} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Cu/CuCrZr components} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Eurofer—PFC-CB supports} \\ \hline Max. & 1.84 & \(\begin{array}{c}67\times 1\\ 67\times 31\end{array}\) & 54.65 & \(\begin{array}{c}60\times 1\\ 60\times 31\end{array}\) & 54.64 & \(\begin{array}{c}13\times 1\\ 13\times 31\end{array}\) \\ \hline Min. & 0.32 & \(1\times 16\) & 6.91 & \(1\times 16\) & 8.83 & \(2\times 16\) \\ \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}