###### Abstract
[12], CE can be defined as _\"A regenerative system in which resource input and waste, emission, and energy leakage are minimised by slowing, closing, and narrowing material and energy loops. This can be achieved through long-lasting design, maintenance, repair, reuse, remanufacturing, refurbishing, and recycling\"_. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation highlighted that the adoption of a CE contributes to the preservation and restoration of natural resources, optimizes the utilization of renewable materials, and eliminates waste through proactive design [13]. The CE model represents a robust framework for fostering economic growth while advancing environmental sustainability [7; 14]. As a result, CE is increasingly recognized as a pathway to addressing these persistent challenges in the building sector [15; 16; 17]. The application of a CE in buildings promotes building materials to undergo discretized stages of construction, use, deconstruction, and repurposed for reuse, recycling, and reintegration into further construction processes [18]. A circular building can be defined as _\"A building that is designed, planned, built, operated, maintained, and deconstructed in a manner consistent with CE principles\"_. This means that every phase of its lifecycle is carefully considered to ensure materials and resources are continuously kept in a closed loop, supporting a regenerative system. [PERSON] et al. [19] described the CE approach in buildings as a lifecycle framework that extends the building's useful life while incorporating end-of-life considerations during the design phase. They introduced the concept of buildings as material banks, where materials are temporarily stored for future recovery and reuse, promoting a shift from traditional models to a circular system that ensures resources remain accessible and are not wasted. Materials in circular construction models are carefully selected for their durability, recyclability, reusability, and ability to support multiple services [20; 21]. The implementation of CE strategies enhances material sustainability and significantly reduces the lifecycle costs (LCCs) of buildings by optimizing resource efficiency [22; 23; 24]. These strategies achieve cost savings and minimize environmental impacts by establishing systems that preserve resource value, ensure continuous circulation, and close the loops for materials, energy, and water [25]. Circular strategies in the built environment can reduce CO2 emissions by 38% or 2 billion tons by 2050 due to the decreased demand for new materials like steel, aluminum, cement, and plastic [26]. Past studies have proposed various strategies for incorporating CE principles into buildings. For example, [PERSON] et al. [27] explored how design for adaptability (DfA) serves as a critical strategy to extend building lifespans and enable material recovery within CE practice. [PERSON] et al. [28] developed a disassembly and deconstruction analytics system using Building Information Modeling (BIM) to evaluate and enhance the end-of-life performance of building designs. [PERSON] et al. [29] proposed a systematic approach to building deconstruction as a sustainable alternative to demolition focusing on material reuse align with CE goals. [PERSON] et al. [30] explored how eco-design methodologies can be applied in the construction sector to facilitate building deconstruction and promote material recovery. Other studies focus on the use of modular, prefabricated, and standardized building materials and components to as circular strategies to promote efficiency and sustainability. [PERSON] and [PERSON] [31] identified 23 critical success factors for integrating circular modular construction projects. [PERSON] [32] highlighted the role of standardization in the adoption of CE in the construction sector. [PERSON] et al.