# The Role of Climbing Exercises in Developing Balance Ability in Children
## 3 Results
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Anthropometric** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**BH (m)**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**BW (kg)**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**BMI kg/m\({}^{2}\)**} \\
**Indicators** & & **IE** & **FE** & **Diff.** & **IE** & **FE** & **Diff.** & **IE** & **FE** & **Diff.** \\ \hline MEG & 1.54 & 1.58 & 0.04 & 42.18 & 45.47 & 3.29 & 17.53 & 18.09 & 0.56 \\ MCG & 1.58 & 1.62 & 0.04 & 45.22 & 48.67 & 3.45 & 17.96 & 19.31 & 1.35 \\ \hline Diff. MEG—MCG & \(-\)0.04 & \(-\)0.04 & 0 & \(-\)3.04 & \(-\)3.20 & \(-\)0.16 & \(-\)0.43 & \(-\)1.22 & \(-\)0.79 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Legend: BH = body height; BW = body weight; BMI = body mass index; MEG = mean of the experimental group; MCG = mean of the control group; IE = initial evaluation; FE = final evaluation.  
\end{table} 
Table 1: The level of anthropometric indicators for EG and CG. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Groups** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Number of Students**} \\ \cline{2-5}  & **h.s.uw.** & **s.uw.** & **m.uw.** & **n.w.** & **ow** \\ \hline EG IE & 12 & 2 & 5 & 9 & 0 \\ EG FE & 8 & 3 & 6 & 10 & 1 \\ \hline Diff. & 4 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline CG IE & 6 & 3 & 6 & 11 & 0 \\ CG FE & 2 & 3 & 8 & 12 & 1 \\ \hline Diff. & 4 & 0 & 2 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline \hline Legend: h.s.uw. = highly severe underweight; s.uw. = severe underweight; m.uw. = moderate underweight; n.w. = normal weight; ow = overweight. & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 2: Representation of differences in BMI values in the EG and CG. Detailing these results, the means within the analysis groups (EG, CG) between the IE and FE, using the Wilcoxon non-parametric test, show significant differences: in the EG, for SSB-R, from IE to FE, the standardized value (Z) is \(-4.62\) at a value of significance threshold (\(p\)) = 0.0001, and for SSB-L, it is Z = \(-4.49\) on \(p\) = 0.0001. In the CG, for SSB-R, Z = \(-3.64\) with \(p\) = 0.0001, and for SSB-L, \(Z\) = \(-4.05\) with \(p\) = 0.0001. Table 4 shows the evolving statistical indicators from the IE to FE in both groups in the Standing Stork test on each leg, showing statistically significant differences calculated by the Mann-Whitney test with a significance threshold \(p\) = 0.0001 between the EG and CG and by the Wilcoxon test with the significance threshold \(p\) = 0.0001 between the IE and FE both in the EG and CG. \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Statistical Indicators**} & **SSB-R\_IE** & **SSB-R\_FE EG** & **SSB-L\_IE** & **SSB-L\_FE EG** \\  & **EG and CG** & **and CG** & **EG and CG** & **and CG** \\ \hline Mann–Whitney U & 0.0001 & 0.0001 & 0.0001 & 0.0001 \\ \hline Wilcoxon W & 325.00 & 325.00 & 325.00 & 325.00 \\ \hline Standardized value Z & \(-6.23\) & \(-6.23\) & \(-6.11\) & \(-6.23\) \\ \hline Significance threshold (\(p\)) & 0.0001 & 0.0001 & 0.0001 & 0.0001 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Legend: SSB-R = Static single-leg balance on the right foot; SSB-L = static single-leg balance on the left foot; IE = initial evaluation; EG = experimental group; CG = control group.  
\end{table} 
Table 4: Dynamics of statistical significance indicators of differences between two groups in Standing Stork test, IE-FE. Figure 5: Distribution of mean (M) results and differences between them for EG and CG, IE and FE Standing Stork test, and final and initial results for right and left leg.