Because of landslide mass movement, the town of Guevejar, located on the central part of the landslide mass, was severely damaged [18], but the town was reconstructed when landslide movement stopped. A century later, on 24 December 1884, a Mw 6.5 earthquake struck the provinces of Granada and Malaga in Spain (Figure 1), inducing a new reactivation of this landslide [19]. Historical documents describe that due to the downslope movement of the earth flow existing at the toe of the landslide, a temporary damning of the river existing at the base of the slope occurred [20]. Because of the renewal of movement, the town was so severely damaged that it was finally abandoned. A new town was built approximately 700 m west of its original location, outside of the landslide limits (Figure 2). During the last few decades, old roads and trails have been asphalted, and new houses have been built within the landslide mass. Figure 1: Location map of the study area. **(1)** Basin basement, **(2)** basin fill (Neogene sedimentary rocks), **(3)** urban areas and **(4)** location of the 1884 earthquake (Mw 6.5) that reactivated the landslide. Figure 2: Geological map of the landslide area. **(1)** Landslide scarps, **(2)** faults, **(3)** springs, **(4)** well points and depth to water table (in m), **(5)** marks unit (MU unit), **(6)** red silts unit (RSU unit), (7) marks of the Marl and Limestone unit (MLU unit), **(8)** limestone of the Marl and Limestone unit (MLU unit), **(9)** red clays of the Recent Red Deposits unit (RRD unit), **(10)** other landslides, **(11)** Güevejar landslide, **(12)** earth-flow in the Güevejáar landslide, **(13)** urban areas and **(14)** strike and dip of bedding. Despite the size and the seismic history of this landslide, it has been poorly studied. In addition to the studies that describe the reactivation of the landslide during past earthquakes [18], a geological model for this landslide was proposed based on ground surface geological data [21]. In this last study, several landslides existing in the area were grouped into a single one. Based on the proposed model, a study into earthquake-induced reactivation criteria, estimating the magnitude of earthquakes that could reactivate this landslide and the maximum epicentral distance of the occurrence of such events, has been performed [22]. More recently, the mobility of the upper part of this landslide, based on a model created from a limited amount of geophysical data and ground surface geological data, was analyzed through quantitative numerical approaches [23]. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive study of this landslide from a geophysical point of view, with the use of several different seismic techniques based on the measurement of ambient noise. Specifically, single-point measurements and array data are analyzed using the HVSR method and the frequency-wavenumber (f-k) technique [8; 24], respectively. Subsequently, the inversion of the HVSR and dispersion curves is carried out by applying the neighborhood algorithm. The results obtained with these methods are constrained by data from boreholes and ground surface geology. The idea is to create the most complete possible model of the considered landslide, useful for later studies about seismic scenarios that could reactivate this landslide in the future. The estimated Vs profiles might be subsequently used for assessing site effects [25].