## 3 Results and Discussion
### Total Polyphenol Content
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Time (Month)**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Treatment**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Package Type**} \\ \cline{3-6}  & & **PE** & **PLA** & **MPP** & **PP** \\ \hline
0 & A–E- & 15.42 \(\pm\) 0.95 ab,A,\(\alpha\) & 15.57 \(\pm\)0.31 A,\(\alpha\beta\) & 16.67 \(\pm\) 0.43 a,A,\(\beta\gamma\) & 15.49 \(\pm\) 0.25 a,A,\(\gamma\) \\
2 & A–E- & 16.11 \(\pm\) 2.00 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 13.17 \(\pm\) 1.02 A,\(\alpha\) & 13.92 \(\pm\) 1.64 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 12.80 \(\pm\) 0.61 a,A,\(\alpha\) \\
4 & A–E- & 18.40 \(\pm\) 0.68 b,B,\(\alpha\) & 18.07 \(\pm\) 0.99 B,\(\beta\) & 18.42 \(\pm\) 1.02 c,B,\(\gamma\) & 10.85 \(\pm\) 0.19 a,A,\(\alpha\) \\
6 & A–E- & 15.67 \(\pm\) 1.80 a,\(\alpha\) & 13.17 \(\pm\) 0.81 A,\(\alpha\) & 12.87 \(\pm\) 0.76 a,\(\alpha\) & 14.28 \(\pm\) 0.91 a,\(\alpha\) \\
8 & A–E- & 16.07 \(\pm\) 2.05 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 12.33 \(\pm\) 0.81 A,\(\alpha\) & 14.67 \(\pm\) 0.25 a,A,\(\alpha\)\(\beta\) & 14.17 \(\pm\) 1.52 ab,A,\(\beta\gamma\) \\ \hline
0 & A–E+ & 13.68 \(\pm\) 0.78 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 14.63 \(\pm\) 0.60 A,\(\alpha\) & 15.31 \(\pm\) 0.51 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 16.23 \(\pm\) 1.03 a,A,\(\alpha\) \\
2 & A–E+ & 16.58 \(\pm\) 1.78 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 15.30 \(\pm\) 0.87 A,\(\alpha\) & 16.02 \(\pm\) 2.38 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 16.81 \(\pm\) 0.97 b,A,\(\gamma\) \\
4 & A–E+ & 13.36 \(\pm\) 1.44 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 16.33 \(\pm\) 1.15 A,\(\alpha\) & 15.00 \(\pm\) 0.59 b,A,\(\alpha\) & 12.91 \(\pm\) 1.03 ab,A,\(\alpha\) \\
6 & A–E+ & 15.40 \(\pm\) 0.75 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 13.93 \(\pm\) 1.94 A,\(\alpha\) & 14.70 \(\pm\) 1.48 ab,A,\(\alpha\) & 14.28 \(\pm\) 1.78 a,A,\(\alpha\)\(\beta\) \\
8 & A–E+ & 14.41 \(\pm\) 0.87 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 14.63 \(\pm\) 1.46 A,\(\alpha\) & 15.94 \(\pm\) 1.35 a,A,\(\alpha\) & 13.74 \(\pm\) 0.64 b,A,\(\alpha\)\(\beta\) \\ \hline
0 & N–E- & 16.74 \(\pm\) 1.12 b,A,\(\beta\) & - & 15.44 \(\pm\) 1.58 a,A,\(\beta\gamma\) & 15.06 \(\pm\) 1.80 a,A,\(\alpha\)\(\beta\) \\
2 & N–E- & 16.11 \(\pm\) 2.00 a,A,\(\alpha\) & - & 12.18 \(\pm\) 0.68 a,A,\(\beta\) & 16.61 \(\pm\) 1.99 a,b,A\(\gamma\) \\
4 & N–E- & 12.91 \(\pm\) 1.03 a,B,\(\alpha\) & - & 6.95 \(\pm\) 0.66 a,\(\alpha\),\(\alpha\) & 15.22 \(\pm\) 0.72 b,B,\(\beta\gamma\) \\
6 & N–E- & 16.16 \(\pm\) 0.88 a,AB,\(\alpha\) & - & 16.16 \(\pm\) 0.88 b,\(\beta\) & 11.57 \(\pm\) 1.03 a,A,\(\alpha\) \\
8 & N-E- & 13.07 \(\pm\) 1.73 a,A,\(\alpha\) & \(\beta\) & 13.25 \(\pm\) 0.98 a,\(\alpha\) & 11.62 \(\pm\) 0.29 a,\(\alpha\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Each value is expressed as mean \(\pm\) standard deviation. PE (polyethylene), PP (polpropylene), MPP (metallized polypropylene), PLA (polylactic acid), A–E+ (air without edible coating), A–E+ (air, with edible coating), N–E- (nitrogen without edible coating), The treatment had a significant effect (F(2;110) = 19.12; \(p<\) 0.001). The type of packaging had a significant effect (F(4;110) = 8.32; \(p<\) 0.001). The interaction of treatment and type of packaging had a significant effect (F(5;110) = 8.84; \(p<\) 0.001). The interaction of treatment and storage time had a significant effect (F(6;810) = 8.13; \(p<\) 0.001). The interaction of storage time and type of packaging had a significant effect (F(12;110) = 5.18; \(p<\) 0.001). The interaction of treatment, storage time and packaging had a significant effect (F(6;2110) = 9.28; \(p<\) 0.001). The presence of different letters indicates that the groups in question are significantly different. Lower case Latin letters: a comparison of treatments with fixed packaging and storage time. Upper case Latin letters: a comparison of packaging materials with fixed treatment and storage time. Lower case Greek letters: comparison of storage times with fixed treatment and packaging material.  
\end{table} 
Table 1: The total polyphenol content of the samples during storage (mg GAE/g). However, as storage progressed, the differences became less pronounced.