## 3 Results
### Results of Model Fit and Hypothesis Testing  
The results of model fit tests were \(\chi^{2}\) = 266.487 and \(p<\)0.001 (good fit: \(p<0.001\)), NFI = 0.935 (good fit: \(>0.9\)), CFI = 0.961 (good fit: \(>0.9\)), CFI = 0.942 (good fit: \(>0.9\)), TLI = 0.952 (good fit: \(>0.9\)), RMSEA = 0.052 (good fit: \(<0.06\)). Therefore, it was evaluated as a good fit in the model fit results. Additionally, composite reliability analysis showed that CR values were between 0.732 and 0.890 (acceptable criteria: \(>0.70\)). The AVE values of each component factor were greater than the correlation coefficients between variables. Thus, the model showed strong composite reliability.  
Table 5 represents the results of hypothesis testing for the proposed relationships. In Table 5, a poor work situation has a positive effect on depression (\(p<0.001\)). Additionally, work-family conflict has a significantly positive impact on depression (\(p=0.019\)). Thus, H1 and H2 are statistically supported. Similarly, depression has a significant effect on poor work engagement (\(p<0.001\)). H3 is therefore statistically supported.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Factor**} & **Measurement** & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Component**} \\ \cline{3-6}  & **Variables** & **1** & **2** & **3** & **4** \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Depression} & Pleasure & 0.881 & 0.062 & 0.027 & 0.157 \\  & Fresh & 0.860 & 0.119 & 0.091 & 0.103 \\  & Active & 0.851 & 0.103 & 0.050 & 0.170 \\  & Interest & 0.837 & \(-\)0.068 & 0.063 & 0.082 \\  & Relax & 0.825 & 0.099 & 0.083 & 0.188 \\  & Responsibility & \(-\)0.069 & 0.815 & 0.052 & 0.183 \\  & Concentration & \(-\)0.054 & 0.791 & 0.017 & 0.177 \\ Work–family & Family & 0.202 & 0.778 & 0.092 & \(-\)0.061 \\ conflict & Tired & 0.270 & 0.741 & 0.080 & \(-\)0.077 \\  & Worry & 0.000 & 0.681 & \(-\)0.040 & 0.170 \\  & Break & 0.007 & \(-\)0.001 & 0.797 & \(-\)0.100 \\ Poor work & Enough time & 0.117 & 0.033 & 0.742 & 0.165 \\ situation & Ideas & 0.037 & 0.038 & 0.675 & 0.148 \\  & Feeling well & 0.096 & 0.092 & 0.639 & 0.325 \\ Poor work & Dedication & 0.197 & 0.124 & 0.129 & 0.793 \\ engagement & Absorption & 0.103 & 0.085 & 0.187 & 0.737 \\  & Vigor & 0.348 & 0.150 & 0.131 & 0.732 \\ Instrument Total & \% of Variance & 30.10\% & 15.89\% & 12.31\% & 7.51\% \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 4: Results of factor analysis.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Hypothesis**} & **Paths** & **Standardized** & **Critical** & \multirow{2}{*}{**\(p\)-Value**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Result**} \\ \cline{3-6}  & & **Coefficient (r)** & **Ratio** & & \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{H1} & Poor work situation & \multirow{2}{*}{0.250} & \multirow{2}{*}{4.325} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(<\)0.001} & \multirow{2}{*}{Supported} \\  & Depression & & & & \\ \multirow{2}{*}{H2} & Work–family conflict & \multirow{2}{*}{0.117} & \multirow{2}{*}{2.348} & \multirow{2}{*}{0.019} & \multirow{2}{*}{Supported} \\  & Depression & & & & \\ \multirow{2}{*}{H3} & Depression & & & & \\ \multirow{2}{*}{H3} & Poor work & \multirow{2}{*}{0.524} & \multirow{2}{*}{10.581} & \multirow{2}{*}{\(<\)0.001} & \multirow{2}{*}{Supported} \\  & engagement & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table}
Table 5: Results of hypothesis testing for the proposed relationships.