## 5 Implementation and Results
### Data Exploration
In turn, in each iteration of the algorithm, the groups in the testing set were adjusted to three so that all artworks in the testing set succeed and a final score was calculated by combining their scores. To achieve this, five distinct datasets were constructed. It is notable that the same method of selecting the weighted average (10% of all posts) was used to determine the most popular group in this dataset. Each time the algorithm was executed, the most popular non-controversial artworks were identified. The final ranking is displayed in Table 7 below. The scores of the most popular controversial artworks range from 9.61 (the highest-ranking value) to \(-1.93\) (the lowest and negative ranking value) according to the ranking task's overall measurement data. According to the results, the first two artworks appear to be the most popular, with the third artwork following closely behind with a lower ranking score, and the remaining artworks demonstrating a particularly precipitous decline, culminating in a negative ranking. Based to the ranking, Waiting for climate change by [PERSON], The Gates of Hell by [PERSON], and Solid Sky by [PERSON] are the most popular works. As with the previous experiment's artworks, a concise explanation of the non-controversial artworks is provided in the lines that follow. The Waiting for climate change project is an art installation by [PERSON] that was exhibited in the summer of 2013 in the moat of the Chateau des Ducs de Bretagne, in Nantes, France. The installation comprised fourteen floating sculptures that moved in line with the wind and water currents. The real-size sculptures depicted figures in business attire. The objective was to demonstrate their apathy towards climate change, and specifically the rising water level [132]. The monumental sculpture The Gates of the Hell by [PERSON] depicts the first part of [PERSON]'s Divine Comedy through 180 figures. It is exhibited in the Musee d'Orsay in Paris. It has been described as [PERSON]'s most repulsive and incoherent sculpture, but it has not been deemed controversial [133]. Solid Sky by [PERSON] \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c} \hline \hline  & **The Final Rank of the Most Popular Non-Controversial Artworks (\(N=2462\))** & & & **Predicted** \\ \hline  & **Artwork** & **Artist** & **ID** & **Ranking Score** \\ \hline
1. & Waiting for climate change & [PERSON] & 10 & 9.61 \\
2. & The Gates of the Hell & [PERSON] & 1 & 9.16 \\
3. & Solid Sky & [PERSON] & 5 & 6.80 \\
4. & Tower & [PERSON] & 4 & 4.82 \\
5. & Illuminated River & [PERSON] & 14 & 4.50 \\
6. & ParaPivot & [PERSON] & 13 & 3.72 \\
7. & IKB 191 & [PERSON] & 3 & 3.57 \\
8. & Maman & [PERSON] & 8 & 2.89 \\
9. & Angel of the North & [PERSON] & 7 & 2.54 \\
10. & Water Tower & [PERSON] & 6 & 1.74 \\
11. & [PERSON] & 12 & 1.32 \\
12. & Orange, Red, Yellow & [PERSON] & 2 & 0.51 \\
13. & Cloud Gate & [PERSON] & 9 & 0.03 \\
14. & Melting House & [PERSON] & 11 & \(-1.93\) \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 7: The final list of non-controversial artworks by ranking outcomes. consists of a polished quartzite sphere weighing 22,000 kg and suspended in steel chains from the ceiling of the 550 Madison building in Manhattan. It is a work with political but not provocative implications, as the artist mentioned when comparing it to the planet Earth, and still remains as a symbol of capitalist corruption and a competitive world [134]. In these two cases, for both research queries, the models that emerged may have been unique, but the results were comparable, which is essential for the ranking's accuracy. Given that both datasets contained popular works of art, this improved both the research questions and the model's reliability.