###### Abstract
Another study measured the mobility of people who prefer micro-mobility devices and suggested that these tools are unique and appropriate for human mobility [11]. Generally, the literature on the use of the micro-mobility vehicle agrees on two issues, energy and environmental factors. [PERSON] and [PERSON] examined the effects of micro-mobility vehicles in four categories: travel behaviour, energy consumption, environmental impacts, and safety regulations [12]. One study emphasized that data from personal e-scooters, eight modes of transportation, travel distance, precipitation, and reach are important factors for choosing a micro-mobility method and emitting less CO\({}_{2}\) with e-scooters [13]. Another study highlighted that micro-mobility vehicles increase social sustainability potential for accessibility, air pollution, safety, physical activity, and subjective well-being and do not produce direct or limited CO\({}_{2}\) emissions [14]. A study has measured the low level of direct CO\({}_{2}\) emission of an e-scooter and, indirectly, the amount of CO\({}_{2}\) that occurs in the material and production process of e-scooter vehicles with a Monte Carlo simulation model [15]. The researcher in the same study indirectly calculated 125 g CO\({}_{2}\)-eq/passenger-km in the CO\({}_{2}\) emission of e-scooter vehicles, which are among the types of micro-mobility vehicles [15]. Another study determined that CO\({}_{2}\) emissions decreased by 16.03% by choosing an e-scooter vehicle instead of a traditional transportation vehicle [16]. As a result, many studies have determined that micro-mobility vehicle preference gives positive results in terms of environmental factors. Considering that the vehicles used in the transportation sector produce 37% of the total CO\({}_{2}\) emissions in the world, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2020) [17], it is seen how vital and necessary primarily electric micro-mobility vehicles are in terms of environmental factors. There is a lot of evidence that the energy cost, which is essential in package or mail transportation and has a large share in the cost, has a positive result with micro-mobility. A study revealed that micro-mobility vehicle preference for transportation or logistics could significantly contribute to reducing the energy of public transport journeys while reducing energy consumption by 1% at the national level and by 2.6% at the city level [18]. Conventional vehicles used in the transportation or logistics sector consumed 28% of the total energy in the USA in 2016, creating a significant cost [19]. Regarding energy consumption in the logistics sector, a transportation vehicle that uses oil fuel can travel 6.4 km,while e-scooter vehicles can travel approximately 128 km with 1 kw/h energy [20]. Another study calculated that an e-scooter vehicle with different battery characteristics would travel about 22.2 km with a fully charged battery [21]. In this study, the e-scooter vehicles used by the PTT travel approximately 40 km with a full battery. The cost of the energy used for the e-scooter for this distance is about 2.17 TL (Turkish Lira). The energy cost of traditional distribution vehicles (such as combivan) is calculated as approximately 86 TL for the same distance. This energy cost may vary according to the battery characteristics of e-scooter vehicles. [PERSON] et al. estimated the average energy consumption of e-scooter vehicles used for transportation at 0.012 kWh/km [21]. The energy consumption of the e-scooter vehicle, which has a different battery feature, is 0.04 kWh per km [22]. A study emphasized that by choosing e-micro-mobility vehicles instead of traditional transportation vehicles in Pittsburgh, energy demand for journeys of 5-8 km would decrease by 50% [23]. As a result, an e-scooter can travel 50 times more than conventional vehicles with the same amount of energy with minimal energy costs.