## 5 Conclusions
Uncertainty analysis of ZEBRA-BEV per km, Table S1: Life Cycle Inventory of cathode production per kg cathode, Table S2: Life Cycle Inventory of cell production per kg cell, Table S3: Life Cycle Inventory of non-cell materials per 1 kg battery pack, Table S4: Life Cycle Inventory of the amount of energy required for the final assembly of 1 kg battery pack, Table S5: Fate of materials, Table S6: Inventory of cell EoL per kg cell, Table S7: Inventory of non-cell EoL per kg battery pack, Table S8: Total life cycle environmental impacts referred to 1 kg of battery pack, Table S9: Impact assessment of battery production stage per kg of battery pack, Table S10: Impact assessment of battery production per kWh, Table S11: Impact assessment of cathode production per kg battery pack, Table S12: Impact assessment of cathode production per kWh, TableS13: Impact assessment of cell production per kg battery pack, Table S14: Impact assessment of cell production per kWh, Table S15: Impact assessment of non-cell materials production per kg battery pack, Table S16: Impact assessment of non-cell materials production per kWh, Table S17: Impact assessment of final assembly's energy per kg of battery pack, Table S18: Impact assessment of cell EoL per kg battery pack, Table S19: Impact assessment of cell EoL per kWh, Table S20: Impact assessment of cell recycling per kg battery pack, Table S21: Impact assessment of cell recycling per kWh, Table S22: Impact assessment of non-cell materials EoL per kg battery pack, Table S23: Impact assessment of non-cell materials EoL per kWh, Table S24: Impact assessment of Zebra battery per kg battery pack, Table S25: Impact assessment of Zebra battery per kWh, Table S26: Impact assessment of DIE-ICEV per km, Table S27: Impact assessment of NMC-BEV per km (first scenario with 2 NMC battery packs), Table S28: Impact assessment of NMC-BEV per km (second scenario with 3 NMC battery packs), Table S29: Impact assessment of ZEBRA-BEV per km, Table S30: Monte Carlo analysis, Table S31: Monte Carlo analysis, Table S32: Monte Carlo analysis. Comparison between battery production in China and in Europe in the second scenario (3 NMC battery packs power the NMC-BEV). **Author Contributions:** Investigation and methodology development, A.A. and M.L.M. ; formal analysis, A.A. and M.L.M. ; writing-original draft preparation, A.A. and M.L.M., writing--review and editing G.D. and E.S. ; supervision G.D. and E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. **Funding:** This research received no external funding. **Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest. **Abbreviations**  
ADP  
Abiotic Depletion Potential  
ADP-FF  
Abiotic Depletion Potential-Fossil Fuels  
AP  
Acidification potential  
BEV  
Battery Electric Vehicle  
BMS  
Battery Management System  
BOL  
Beginning of Life  
BOM  
Bill of Materials  
CED  
Cumulative Energy Demand  
EoL  
End-of-Life  
EP  
Eutrophication potential  
F-ECOTP  
Freshwater Aquatic Eotoxicity  
FU  
Functional Unit  
GHG  
Greenhouse gas  
GVW  
Gross Vehicle Weight  
GWP  
Global warming potential  
HTP  
Human Toxicity Potential  
ICEV  
Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle  
LCI  
Life Cycle Inventory
LCIA  
Life Cycle Impact Assessment  
LDCV  
Light Duty Commercial Vehicle  
LFP  
Lithium Iron Phosphate  
LIB  
Li-Ion Batteries  
LCA  
Life Cycle Assessment  
LiPF6  
Lithium Hexafluorophosphate  
M-ECOTP  
Marine Aquatic Eotoxicity Potential  
NMC  
Nickel-Manganese-Cobalt  
NMP  
N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone  
ODP  
Ozone depletion potential  
PE
Polyethylene  
PEFCR  
Product Environmental Footprint Category Rule  
PET  
polyethylene terephthalate  
POP  
Photochemical Oxidation Potential  
PP  
Polypropylene  
T-ECOTP  
Terrestrial Eotoxicity Potential  
ZEBRA  
Sodium-Nickel-Chloride