## 5 Results and Discussion
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Modern Technology** & \begin{tabular}{c} **Modern Technology** \\ **Notation** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Type of** \\ **Preference** \\ **Function** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Class of** \\ **Preference** \\ **Function** \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{c} **Parameter** \\ **Value** \\ \end{tabular} & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Unit of Preference** \\ **Function** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **Perspective for** \\ **Assessment of** \\ **Industrial** \\ **Transformation** \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline Ethical AI and Social & & & & & & \\ Responsibility & L44 & Qualitative & 2 & 1 & - & U2 \\ AI Combined with & & & & & \\ Human Intelligence & L45 & Qualitative & 2 & 1 & - & U2 \\ \hline Sustainable & & & & & & \\ Production and & L51 & Qualitative & 2 & 1 & - & U1 \\ Circular Economy & & & & & & \\ Renewable Energy & & & & & & \\ and Smart Grids & & & & & & \\ Autonomous Vehicles & & & & & & \\ and Drones & & & & & & \\ \hline Biotechnology and & & & & & & \\ Nanotechnology & & & & & & \\ Quantum Computing & & & & & & & \\ New Materials & & & & & & \\  & & & & & & \\ Digital Twin & & & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 8: _Cont._ \begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c} \hline \hline
**Modern Technology** & \
\begin{tabular}{c} **Parameter** \\ **Notation** \\ \end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c} **U1–U2** \\ **Value** \\ \end{tabular} & **U1–U3** & **U2–U1** & **U2–U3** & **U3–U1** & **U3–U2** \\ \hline L11 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ L12 & 1 & 0.834 & 0.500 & 0 & 0 & 0.334 \\ L13 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 0.250 & 0.042 & 0.209 & 0 \\ L21 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ L22 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ L23 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ L31 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ L32 & 2 & 0.500 & 0.459 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.042 \\ L33 & 2 & 0.083 & 0.042 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.042 \\ L34 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ L41 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ L42 & 2 & 0.375 & 0.209 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.167 \\ L43 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ L44 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ L45 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ L51 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ L52 & 2 & 0.333 & 0.167 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.167 \\ L53 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ L61 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ L62 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ L63 & 2 & 0.417 & 0.250 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.167 \\ L64 & 2 & 0.125 & 0.083 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.042 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}
\end{table} 
Table 9: Differences between perspectives for industrial transformation assessment considering the value of the preference function parameter. Based on the PROMETHE II method, the top-ranked technologies within each evaluation perspective can be summarized as follows:  
* Economic perspective (U1): L42 (Hyper-Personalized Production), L52 (Renewable Energy and Smart Grids), L64 (Digital Twin);
* Organizational perspective (U2): L12 (Cybersecurity), L22 (Big Data and Data Analytics), L45 (AI Combined with Human Intelligence);
* Technological perspective (U3): L11 (Internet of Things--IoT), L23 (IT Support Systems), L63 (New Materials). This summary enables easier cross-perspective comparison and supports decision-makers in identifying the most strategically relevant technologies in line with their organizational priorities. In the final stage of the PROMETHE II method's application, three key parameters were calculated for each of the three analysed perspectives: leaving flow (8), entering flow (9), and net flow (10). These parameters form the basis for the final ranking of the transformation assessment perspectives, reflecting their overall preference level in the context of Industry 4.0 and 5.0. The values are presented in Table 11.