## 3 Results and Discussion
### Annoyance
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{\multirow{6}{*}{2029}} & \multirow{6}{*}{Publan et.al. [6]} & \multirow{6}{*}{77/483} & \multirow{6}{*}{Normalizedization (MB),} & \multirow{6}{*}{Automationation of the impact of mild noise in the micro dataset} \\  & & & & & \\ \cline{4-7}  & & & & & \\ \cline{4-7}  & & & & & & \\ \cline{4-7}  & & & & & \\ \cline{4-7}  & & & & & \\ \cline{4-7}  & & & & & \\ \cline{4-7}  & & & & & & \\ \cline{4-7}  & & & & & \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular}   
\begin{tabular}{c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{\multirow{6}{*}{2029}} & \multirow{6}{*}{[PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON] and [PERSON] [5]} & \multirow{6}{*}{100} & \multi  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Year**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Studies**} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{**Studies**} \\ \cline{3-7}  & & \begin{tabular}{c} Number of \\ Pendigrams/Sample \\ \end{tabular}  & **Main Human Health Effects** & **Methodology** & **Depense** & ** Outcomes** \\ \hline \hline \multirow{9}{*}{23019} & \multirow{9}{*}{\ \begin{tabular}{c} [PERSON], [PERSON], [PERSON] and \\ [PERSON] [7] \\ \end{tabular}  } & \multirow{9}{*}{ \begin{tabular}{c} 140 (between 21 and \\ 55 years) \\ \end{tabular}  } &  
[PERSON] et al. [40] explored the determinants of annoyance due to tinnitus, that is, low-frequency noise. This article explored the relationship between contextual, situational, and personal characteristics with the level of annoyance due to low-frequency noise, based on secondary analysis of existing data. The results obtained showed significant differences between cities and neighbourhoods, a significant association between background noise levels during the day, and an inverse effect at night. The level of background noise, sensitivity to noise, and dissatisfaction with the residential situation were strongly associated with higher levels of annoyance. Based on the association with nighttime background levels, it was found that the lower the levels, the greater the annoyance due to tinnitus [40]. The main results of the studies by [PERSON] et al. [46] and [PERSON], [PERSON], and [PERSON] [44] have already been described in Section 3.2. [PERSON] et al. (2018) found that the average noise levels during the construction and drilling of an oil and gas well exceeded the levels associated with health annoyance; that is, they were above 50 dBA or 60 dBC [46]. [PERSON], [PERSON], and [PERSON] [44] found that the annoyance experienced was very low and that symptoms of dizziness were not observed in this study. [PERSON] [43] carried out a study regarding annoyance due to wind energy, with a questionnaire carried out for the analysis. In this survey, it was observed that 81% answered that they did not feel annoyed due to the generation of wind energy, while 8% answered that they felt very or a little annoyed [43]. The results related to noise annoyance determined by [PERSON] et al. [52] and [PERSON] et al. [50] have already been covered in Section 3.3. However, in addition to what was mentioned earlier, [PERSON] et al. [50] concluded that the closest associations between noise exposure and blood pressure were estimated for participants who reported higher classifications of annoyance, irritation, and sensitivity to noise. This indicates that the annoyance from internal noise and sensitivity to noise develop regardless of the level of exposure to external noise. The authors also found that people who were sensitive to noise and participants most irritated due to internal noise had significantly higher SBP and DBP than others [50]. Finally, [PERSON] et al. [55] determined an audible internal low-frequency tone modulated in amplitude in the frequency of the passage of the blade for 20% of the time up to a distance of 2.4 km. The audible amplitude modelling took place for a similar percentage of time between the wind farm's percentage power capacities of 40% and 85%. The modelling of the audible amplitude in the interior still occurred for 16% of the time at a distance of 3.5 km.