## 3 Results
### Analysis of ALB Oviposition on MeJA-Treated PaP  
The results showed that the survival rate of ALB larvae on PaP treated with MeJA was significantly lower than that of untreated ones (\(p<0.01\)). The comprehensive evaluation index (\(I\)) can effectively reflect ALB-resistance of PaP treated with MeJA aqueous solutions, with the concentration of \(10^{-4}\) mol/L of MeJA inducing the highest ALB resistance (\(p<0.01\)) (Table 5).  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multirow{2}{*}{**Gender**} & \multirow{2}{*}{**Treatment**} & **Number of** & **Feeding Area** & **Food Intake** & **Insect Frass** & **Damage** \\  & & **ALB Feeding** & **(mm\({}^{2}\))** & **(g)** & **in 48 h (mg)** & **Level (\(D\))** \\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Female} & Untreated & 6.33 \(\pm\) 1.53 a & 9.00 \(\pm\) 2.01 ab & 0.52 \(\pm\) 0.06 a & 15.06 \(\pm\) 0.41 a & 7.73 \\  & Mechanical injury & 6.67 \(\pm\) 2.89 a & 10.33 \(\pm\) 2.51 a & 0.47 \(\pm\) 0.18 a & 11.40 \(\pm\) 0.83 a & 7.72 \\  & \(10^{-3}\) & 7.33 \(\pm\) 5.15 a & 5.00 \(\pm\) 1.00 bc & 0.24 \(\pm\) 0.08 ab & 12.09 \(\pm\) 3.98 a & 6.17 \\  & \(10^{-4}\) & 3.00 \(\pm\) 0.00 a & 3.67 \(\pm\) 0.58 c & 0.08 \(\pm\) 0.01 b & 7.56 \(\pm\) 3.07 a & 3.58 \\  & \(10^{-5}\) & 3.67 \(\pm\) 2.52 a & 3.00 \(\pm\) 1.00 c & 0.09 \(\pm\) 0.06 b & 8.49 \(\pm\) 1.42 a & 3.81 \\  & \(10^{-6}\) & 2.67 \(\pm\) 0.58 a & 3.33 \(\pm\) 0.57 c & 0.11 \(\pm\) 0.01 b & 11.11 \(\pm\) 1.78 a & 4.31 \\  & Untreated & 10.33 \(\pm\) 1.20 a & 16.67 \(\pm\) 2.60 a & 0.23 \(\pm\) 0.04 a & 4.72 \(\pm\) 1.09 a & 7.99 \\  & Mechanical injury & 4.00 \(\pm\) 1.15 b & 8.33 \(\pm\) 1.33 a & 0.12 \(\pm\) 0.02 a & 6.42 \(\pm\) 0.30 a & 4.72 \\  & \(10^{-3}\) & 4.67 \(\pm\) 1.85 b & 7.67 \(\pm\) 3.84 a & 0.06 \(\pm\) 0.02 b & 4.44 \(\pm\) 2.51 a & 4.56 \\ Male & \(10^{-4}\) & 1.33 \(\pm\) 0.33 b & 10.00 \(\pm\) 2.52 a & 0.06 \(\pm\) 0.01 b & 5.83 \(\pm\) 2.68 a & 4.31 \\  & \(10^{-5}\) & 4.00 \(\pm\) 1.53 b & 8.33 \(\pm\) 0.33 a & 0.08 \(\pm\) 0.05 ab & 3.28 \(\pm\) 0.96 a & 3.95 \\  & \(10^{-6}\) & 3.67 \(\pm\) 1.45 b & 5.67 \(\pm\) 3.18 a & 0.07 \(\pm\) 0.03 b & 4.24 \(\pm\) 0.80 a & 3.41 \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note: Data are means \(\pm\) SE. One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences between treatments. Values in the same column followed by different lowercase letters were significantly different to each other at \(\alpha=0.05\) for females and males, respectively.  
\end{table}
Table 4: Feeding of ALB adults on branches and leaves of PaP after MeJA treatment compared with untreated control and mechanical injury of PaP.  
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{c}{**Chemicals**} & **Control** & **\(\mathbf{10^{-3}}\) mol/L** & **\(\mathbf{10^{-4}}\) mol/L** & **\(\mathbf{10^{-5}}\) mol/L** & **\(\mathbf{10^{-6}}\) mol/L** \\ \hline Z3 HA & 275.92 \(\pm\) 1.43 a & 210.54 \(\pm\) 2.01 c & 37.39 \(\pm\) 1.50 e & 218.17 \(\pm\) 1.96 b & 172.19 \(\pm\) 2.01 d \\ Z3H & 362.54 \(\pm\) 2.17 b & 34.11 \(\pm\) 1.50 d & 17.15 \(\pm\) 1.37 e & 400.49 \(\pm\) 2.25 a & 329.09 \(\pm\) 10.57 c \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} Note: Data are means \(\pm\) SE. Quantified by external standard method: Z3 HA: Y = 1.3 X \(\times\)\(10^{-6}\) + 2.12; Z3H: Y = 3.72 X \(\times\)\(10^{-6}\) – 1.243; unit: ng/uL. Values in the same row followed by different lower-case letters were significantly different to each other (\(p<0.05\)) ([PERSON]’s multiple comparison).  
\end{table}
Table 3: Comparison of quantities of Z3 HA and Z3H released in different treatment groups.